310341_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201022

i WDivisiou of Water Resources ° ,. .
e.
Facility Number'= �j� - 0 Division of Soil and Watier Conservation '
'0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Co7liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: &Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 0 Arrival Time: , ate' Departure Time: County: Region: W120
Farm Name: Ld' I A 90 S Owner Email:
Owner Name: L AI LA 1) C I' O O N Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: LA4 t_AO 9.2s Tc,,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design ° Current
Swine Capacity ."Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 1la V
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design.: Current -.Design. Current-,
Wet Poultry Capacity ',Pop. Cattle . : ° `Capacity
Layer
Non -Layer
Design „Current
Dry Poultry Canacitvtl : ,Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes elNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [/NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Leo
❑ NA
❑ NE
0 Yes
To
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 31 - r Date of Inspection: `p-a �poZD
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EX10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Fg4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: I
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): ate— _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes [gl**No ❑ NA ❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes FlAo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesQ,,Xo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [:j- o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes B No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes EDAo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
©'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
L 2-do
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
4]Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Fg4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 -141 7 1 Date of Inspection: I()-aa- d-0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E346 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ['NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EY!o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? [—]Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 2 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [2IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
,, to ❑ NA ❑ NE
E�J,Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additionatrecommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of :facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
,ne1v d� �'�Gr-- I ift`r_tellln� c�5 S
o-9,s'
P-4,a
m7
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 7o 14 o F n..ra-Lf
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
21412015