20201658 Ver 1_Meeting Request Review_20201102

ID#* 20201658 Version* 1
Regional Office* Wilmington Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Holley Snider
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 11/2/2020
Contact Name *
Contact Email Address*
Project Name*
Project Owner*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Patrick Meier
[e-mail]
Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project - Ramsey Road
Joe Keily
Onslow
Street Address
401 Executive Parkway
Address Line 2
aty
New Bern
Rbstal / Zip Code
28562
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
r- 401 Water Quality Certification - W 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
r- Individual Permit r- Modification
r- Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
State / Frovince / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Please give a brief project description below. *

Piedmont Natural Gas proposes to construct the Ramsey Road segment of
the Highway 17 North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Distribution Replacement Project (Project) near the City of Jacksonville in
Onslow County, North Carolina. The Project is located along a 3.19-mile
section of Ramsey Road (Route 1324) and Kellum Loop Road, northeast of
the City of Jacksonville. The Project will begin approximately 0.17 miles
east of the intersection of Route 1324 and Carolina Forest Boulevard,
proceeds east along Route 1324 for approximately 3.12 miles, turns
southeast and proceeds for 0.17 miles along Kellum Loop Road, and ends
at New Bern Highway (Highway 17).
The Project is being constructed to replace a portion of an existing natural
gas distribution pipeline that extends along Highway 17. This portion of the
pipeline will be decommissioned and removed due to a proposed NCDOT
project involving Highway 17. The NCDOT project will consist of widening
and reconfiguring Highway 17, and the existing pipeline needs to be
relocated to allow for the expansion. A location map has been provided in
Appendix D.
The Project will consist of installing approximately 16,922 linear feet of 8-
inch medium -dense polyethylene (MDPE) natural gas distribution pipeline
within a proposed 35-foot-w4de construction easement. The easement will
consist of a 20-foot-wide temporary work area and a 15-foot-wide
permanent maintenance easement to remain post -construction.
Construction will involve 11,309 feet of conventional open cut trenching,
5,438 feet of horizontal directional drilling (HDD), and 175 feet of auger
bore. Construction will involve the use of typical heavy construction
equipment (e.g., excavators, dozers, scrapers, side booms) and will be
executed in compliance with all required permits and regulatory conditions.
The Project will span across wetlands and tributaries associated with Wolf
Swamp. The majority of the construction easement will be located within
existing maintained utility easements; however, some tree clearing will be
required within the construction easement to allow proper access and
clearance for construction activities.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
11 /16/2020
11 /17/2020
11 /18/2020
11 /19/2020
11 /20/2020
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Hwy17 Ramsey Road PCN to DWR.pdf 55.01 MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location

and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 11/2/2020
Reviewer Meeting Request Decision
Has a meeting been scheduled?* r Yes r No

BURNS �RME-DONNELL
Pre -Construction Notification
Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project — Ramsey Road
Piedmont Natural Gas
Onslow County, North Carolina
Prepared by
Burns & McDonnell
burnsmcd.com

BURNS &;MEDONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
October 26, 2020
Page 2
Proiect Description and Necessity
Piedmont Natural Gas proposes to construct the Ramsey Road segment of the Highway 17 North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Distribution Replacement Project (Project) near
the City of Jacksonville in Onslow County, North Carolina. The Project is located along a 3.19-
mile section of Ramsey Road (Route 1324) and Kellum Loop Road, northeast of the City of
Jacksonville. The Project will begin approximately 0.17 miles east of the intersection of Route
1324 and Carolina Forest Boulevard, proceeds east along Route 1324 for approximately 3.12
miles, turns southeast and proceeds for 0.17 miles along Kellum Loop Road, and ends at New Bern
Highway (Highway 17).
The Project is being constructed to replace a portion of an existing natural gas distribution pipeline
that extends along Highway 17. This portion of the pipeline will be decommissioned and removed
due to a proposed NCDOT project involving Highway 17. The NCDOT project will consist of
widening and reconfiguring Highway 17, and the existing pipeline needs to be relocated to allow
for the expansion. A location map has been provided in Appendix D.
Construction Methodology
The Project will consist of installing approximately 16,922 linear feet of 8-inch medium -dense
polyethylene (MDPE) natural gas distribution pipeline within a proposed 35-foot-wide
construction easement. The easement will consist of a 20-foot-wide temporary work area and a
15-foot-wide permanent maintenance easement to remain post -construction. Construction will
involve 11,309 feet of conventional open cut trenching, 5,438 feet of horizontal directional drilling
(HDD), and 175 feet of auger bore. Construction will involve the use of typical heavy construction
equipment (e.g., excavators, dozers, scrapers, side booms) and will be executed in compliance with
all required permits and regulatory conditions. The Project will span across wetlands and
tributaries associated with Wolf Swamp. The majority of the construction easement will be located
within existing maintained utility easements; however, some tree clearing will be required within
the construction easement to allow proper access and clearance for construction activities.
Wetland Impacts
A wetland delineation was conducted by Burns & McDonnell in September and October 2019 and
identified multiple wetlands and other waterbodies within the Project.
Impacts from construction activities within wetland areas will not result in any permanent loss of
wetlands.
Construction activities associated with the 20-foot-wide temporary work area will result in 15
temporary impacts to wetlands associated with clearing, grubbing, and construction support for
pipeline installation. Construction activities associated with the 15-foot-wide permanent
maintenance easement will result in four temporary impacts to palustrine emergent (PEM)

BURNS SME-DONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
October 26, 2020
Page 3
wetlands associated with open trenching and HDD activities. Although these areas are located
within the permanent maintenance easement, post -construction pipeline maintenance will not
result in a permanent conversion of the PEM areas and are therefore, considered temporary
impacts. The impacted areas will be returned to original grade and restored prior to demobilization
of the project. Vegetation will not be permanently altered and allowed to return naturally over
time. Locations of these impacts are illustrated on the Impact Figures in Appendix D. Total acreage
of temporary impacts has been provided below and are outlined in detail in Table 3 in Appendix
B.
Activities associated with construction and routine post -construction pipeline maintenance within
the 15-foot-wide permanent maintenance easement will result in seven permanent conversion
impacts to palustrine forested (PFO) and palustrine scrub -shrub (PSS) wetlands. Due to
Piedmont's Integrity Management Guidelines, PFO and PSS areas on the surface of the HDD will
be cleared with roots left in -place. This will result in a conversion of PFO and PSS wetlands to
PEM wetlands.
No permanent fills within wetland areas will occur as a result of the Project
Temporary Impacts:
0.795-acre PFO
0.593-acre PSS
0.338-acre PEM
Permanent Conversion Impacts:
0.016-acre PFO to PEM
1.03-acre PSS to PEM
Waterways:
This project will cross the mainstem of Wolf Swamp (S-01) via HDD as illustrated on sheet 12 of
the Design Drawings. The HDD will cross underneath the stream channel at a minimum depth of
five feet below the bottom of the channel. As a result, no impacts to the mainstem of Wolf Swamp
are anticipated.
The project will also result in temporary impacts to four potentially jurisdictional ditches via open
trenching methods. These locations are illustrated on pages 2, 7, and 10 of the Impact Figure and
on sheets 6, 13, and 16 of the Design Drawings. Upon completion of construction at each location,
the ditches will be restored to preconstruction conditions. Total linear feet of temporary impacts
are provided below and outlined in detail in Table 4.

BURNS 1%ME-DONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
October 26, 2020
Page 4
Temporary Impacts:
87.06 linear feet — potentially jurisdictional ditches
Indirect impacts to waters are anticipated to be minimal as Best Management Practices (BMPs)
will be installed for the purposes of erosion and sediment controls which are illustrated on the
Design Drawings. BMPs will be inspected regularly to confirm proper maintenance and function.
Threatened & Endangered Species
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information, Planning, and Conservation (FWS
IPaQ report, the following federally protected species may occur within the vicinity of the Project:
• West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus)
• Eastern black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. Jamaicensis)
• Piping plover (Charadrius melodus)
• Red knot (Calidris canutus rufa)
• Red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
• American alligator (Alligator miss iss ippiensis)
• Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
• Kemp's Ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii)
• Leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea)
• Loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta)
• Cooley's meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi)
• Golden sedge (Carex lutea)
• Pondberry (Lindera melissifolia)
• Rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
• Seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus)
No critical habitats were determined to be within the Project area.
A protected species habitat assessment letter was prepared and submitted to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office on October 1, 2020 to request
consultation under the requirements of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Burns &
McDonnell proposed that the Project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species. A
copy of the letter has been provided in Appendix G. At the time of submittal of this PCN, a
response from USFWS had not been received. Correspondence from USFWS will be submitted to
the USACE upon receipt.

BURNS &;MEDONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
October 26, 2020
Page 5
Cultural Resources
According to the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS service application
online for non -archaeological historic -age resources, no previous surveys were documented within
the proposed area of potential effects (APE). One previously recorded non -archeological historic -
age resource was located within the APE near the eastern terminus of the Project:
• Resource # ON0263 —Benjamin Lee Parker House — Unevaluated (Surveyed Only)
A project review letter was prepared and submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) in Raleigh, North Carolina on September 24, 2020 requesting consultation under the
requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). A copy of the
letter has been provided in Appendix G. At the time of submittal of this PCN, a response from
SHPO had not been received. Correspondence from SHPO will be submitted to USACE upon
receipt.
Alternatives Analysis
Avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands and other waterbodies was attempted by
routing the pipeline within and adjacent to already existing and maintained utility and NCDOT
easements. The temporary work area and permanent maintenance easement were kept as narrow
as possible to minimize disturbances during construction and maintenance. The majority of
impacts will be temporary, and the Proj ect will not result in a loss of wetlands or other waterbodies.
The pipeline will be partially installed using HDD, which means the permanent pipeline easement
will not require earth work. Tree clearing will be required as part of PNG's Integrity Management
Plan; however, stumps and root systems will remain in place. Construction matting will be used at
the open cut stream and wetland crossings to help minimize the disturbance.
The project will be constructed in accordance with state/local and federal guidelines pertaining to
minimizing impacts during construction. An approved and certified erosion and sediment control
plan will be provided to the contractor for proper implementation of appropriate BMPs.
Additionally, measures to minimize wetland and stream channel impacts from vehicle activity will
be utilized.
Summation
The proposed Project intends to relocate a natural gas distribution pipeline in response to the
widening of Highway 17 by NCDOT. Multiple wetlands and potentially jurisdictional ditch
impacts are anticipated; however, the majority of impacts will be temporary, and no permanent
loss of jurisdictional wetlands will occur. The Project will result in the permanent conversion of
0.016-acre of PFO wetlands and 1.03-acres of PSS wetlands to PEM wetlands. No impacts to
federal listed species are anticipated and no critical habitat was determined to be within the Project.
One historical property was identified within the Project area, which we are awaiting consultation
from SHPO on how to proceed.

APPENDICES:
APPENDIX A
- PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
APPENDIX B
- AQUATIC RESOURCES AND IMPACTS
TABLES
APPENDIX C
- AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
APPENDIX D
- FIGURES
APPENDIX E
- DESIGN DRAWINGS
APPENDIX F -
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT AND
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION REQUEST
APPENDIX G - USFWS AND SHPO REQUEST FOR
CONSULTATION LETTERS
APPENDIX H - PNG PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED ACCESS
CORRIDOR PROTOCOL

APPENDIX A -PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION

O�OF 1N A T E'Ce
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 In
below.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
NCDOT Highway 17 Distribution Relocation - Ramsey Road
2b.
County:
Onslow County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple landowners (see attached list and parcel map)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Joseph B. Keily
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d.
Street address:
401 Executive Parkway
4e.
City, state, zip:
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
[phone]
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Patrick Meier
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Burns & McDonnell
5c.
Street address:
7201 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 100
5d.
City, state, zip:
Richmond, Virginia 23226
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
See County Pin List and Parcel Map attached
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.810293 Longitude:-77.390152
1 c.
Property size:
11.3 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Wolf Swamp
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
New
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Project Area mainly consists of mixed hardwood pine forest, agricultural fields, residential and commercial areas, and existing maintained utility
and NCDOT right-of-way.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 4.438
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 142.74
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to relocate a portion of an existing distribution pipeline due to NCDOT's planned improvements of Highway 17
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See provided narrative
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments: PJD Request included in Appendix F
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
Please see attached Aquatic Resource Impacts Table.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Please see attached Aquatic Resource Impacts Table.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
131
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached narrative.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See attached narrative.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: Awaiting review and consultation with USACE before proceeding with in -lieu program
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project imperviousness will not be altered and is not a high density project. General maintenance of the pipeline corridor will be conducted in
compliance with NC Water Quality General Certification No. 4133 as outlined in the "Piedmont Natural Gas Permanently Maintained Access Corridor
Protocol" found in Appendix H.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Onslow County
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not Applicable.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
See attached narrative.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA EFH Interactive Mapper.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑X Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached narrative. One feature was identified on HPOWEB database as a structure that is no longer present. Waiting for SHPO consultation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No fills within floodplain. Burns & McDonnell has coordinated with Onslow County, and will apply for a floodplain permit for the Project if needed.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA website. See attached figures.
Patrick K. Meier
Date 10-26-2020
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

= 4 •
j � •
U � •
CN O LO M r LO O LO N O) CO 'D N M M r) M N
CEO N O M LO M M M h M M O O co CO O r r lMf) CO N M N
CO O N p �LO d1 0 CO O NN) FN_ M N CO CC)m O M M M �_ CO M CO CO O
O O O O O O p 0 O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O
U
z
0
M
Z
0
O
J
J
M
F
z
w
O
w
Z_
z
Q
J
0
Z
0
O
N
0
0
U
z
0
M
Z
0
}
F
Z
D
0
U
0
J
M
z
0
0
O
M
0
0
U
z
0
M
Z
0
O
w
0
}
O
}
z
0
F
z
Q
0
O
0
0
W
0
0
z
W
z
w
0
o }
Z F
w
w
2 W
� W
W Z
O D
U') w
w F
LU
M Q
M
Q
F Z
LL 0 J
O
Q
Q O
m F
w m
= 0
Z
0
O
M
0
0
O
z
0
J
M
z
0
W
J
J
>
Z
0
Y
O
Q
LL
0
}
U
0
O
O
0
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
U
Z
M
W
Z
0
2
m
m
Q
z
Z
}
w
m
0
O
r
0
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
W
J
J
>
Z
0
Y
O
Q
LL
0
}
F
U
0
O
co
0
0
O
Z
0
M
Z
0
O
Z
0
J
M
z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
O
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
z
0
F
w
m
Y
w
_U
J
Q
O
0
_O
O
O
z
0
J
M
Z
0
w
F
F
w
w
w
>
w
LU
w
m
N
N
J
W
o6
w
z
0
F
z
W
m
W
Z
w
O
w Z
z0
J Z
J W
Q m
0
0
O
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
III
O O
z z
0 0
00
F
0
F O
F O
0:�
� <
O 0
F U
F 06
W W
m �
0 F
F F
F O
0 O
� F
w
O
w 0
} w
U
0
O
N N
00
O
O
z
0
M
Z
0
0
O
Q
w
0
U
W
F
F
0
O
F
w
(D
w
0
w
0
O
M
N
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O O
z z
0 0
00
W
J
J_
>
Z
O 0
Z_ Y
O
W Q
� LL
O U 0
>
Z
Q U
O O
Lo N (.0
00
O
z
0
M
Z
0
O
O
N
0
O
z
0
M
Z
0
0
O
N
0
O
z
0
J
M
Z
0
0
O
O7
N
0

l0 M M O� M h Iq O N CO 0 CD u) ^ HCOM"Iuld
0Od7 d7 d7 r'`) � O� V Ln CO V V d7 � OOCM � V� Oh N M NMO M O CO 4�CO Zc0OCDVOO N MCN N N N N O N M N N N O N l0 N00 N O
O OOOOOO O O O O NOO 000 O 0 0 0 0
0
Z
Q
M
Q
J
J
W
0
z
Q
W
J
W
J
}
Y
Q
Z
Z
OU-)
z Q
O J
CO
U Z
< LU
CO LU
LULU
0 cn
Z
W
[0
2
M
w Q
M
Q w
fl� U-)
Z �
LUQ
W
QO
Z
� Q
d' W
W J
w
U U
Z Z
O O
OO
Z
O
M
0
O
O
z
z
Q
F
W
W
Q
U
Q
06
Z
O
U-) O
0 Z
O
LU
U 2
Z
Z [0
LU
J Z
Q Q
0 0
Lo c0
O O
aEI�-
COT
2
�
O
0 0
Ih CO
M M
O O
U
Z
O
J
Z
O
2
LU F
W 2:
Q (n
2: W
Q Z
cn Q
W W
W W
w O
t J
2 Z
� w
� J
M W
J
W =
O Z
a U') w
w Q �
J 2 W
J Q 0
w Z
O O Q
�zLU LU LU
Q J W
z
cn Q O
w :If F
F J
LWL �7>Q
J (n >
O
0
O
U
Z
O
J
M
Z
O
2
Q M 2
2 Z F
� Cf)
D J
Z cn J
LU _ w
J Z
J
Q a
J
U
Q LU
J
d F W
O O
Q w w
F
LU Z Q
w fl� U-)
F Q' W
=OLWL
W 06
M J d'
W W
W 2 �
W ~ �
LU LU
M W
O
O
Ln
O
I
0
0
Oj
O
W
W
0
Z
Q
X
w
J
Q
0
z
O
}
Q
W
2
F
W
Y
O
O
O
Ln
O
U
Z
O
J
M
Z
O
}
Q
O
F
w LU
Q Q
U-) U-)
W W
LU
LL LWL
J J
77
.� cn
U 2
J }
U-) ~
O
J d'
J
00
u 06
Z 2
F
0 Cf)
O
0
N
Ln
O
U
Z
0
U)
z
O

�`''°r� r� 1'21+r�,t @' ,'',j! `Mi''i'r�� o +Nitre \ w •x : T1r ..
TAR 7t -oNW
LL-1001
.—MENT
ne �
vn 5e, 'G.-ya
CAROLINA PLANTATION
OWNERS ASSOCIATION
TAX 159174 _
DB 3370, PG 801
_
PB 68, PG 11 /
L-1002
NOLAN INVESTMENTS LLC
TAX ID: 159178
\
/
PB 70, PG 191
\ \
h
ONSLOW COUNTY \
J
-� \ TAX ID: 040761
PB 24, PG 211
-
DB 842, PG 190

• v-.ys� '.'*y,rAl•.ta�'.r7!"".' .n,•+s;. .-� " �� ... _ -.. _ ,c• V,•� '�',�r.."
LL-1004
ANTHONY W SYDES
TAX ID: 032428
/
DB 2149, PG 44
/
\ \ LL-1005
\ \
/
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES NCSU
TAX ID: 040706
/
DB 516, PG 408
\
/CITY
/
SONVILLE /
TWo: 154956 I
PG 68
�
Y
n
i
\
�
V
' LL-1008/LL-1009
DEED OVERLAP
(BOUNDARY DISPUTE)
lw
LL-1007 i
BRYNN MARR HOMES INC
ko TAX ID: 065563 i
' = _ PB 63, PG 68 LL-1008
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
TAX ID: 154956
PB 63, PG 68

\
1
\
1
\
I
\ -
1
\
1
\
I
\
,1
\
1
\
1
\
1
\
1
\
1
LL-1010
\
JACOBS TRACY DEAN &
SUSAN RAE
TAX ID::021840 1
\
DB 5I D, PG 331 1
\
DB 137, PG 197
\
LL-1013
DAVIS STEPHEN DOUG' &
\
\ I 1 I
II
SAN DRXDO AHUM 3B HREY TAX
\ 1 11
DB 422, PG 603
LL-1012
\ I 1 TOMMIEC&NANCY
LLI
THOMAS I
\ 1 I
KELLUM JU
JUD
TAX ID: 02 672w
11
TAX ID: 0139 13957
\ I DB 584 PG 237
DB 137 PG 197
\ 1
I � �
— �LL-1008/LL-1009
r \ DEED OVERLAP
�\(BOUNDARY DISPUTE)
LL-1011 -
s - SILENCE IVY D & — J
"VAL
TAX ID: 008654
DB 732, PG 175
��----� LL-1015 \\
HUM PHREY SHIRLEN \
LEE &SHIRLEY /1\
TAX ID: 012319
DB 318, PG 499
DB 1187 PG 946 /
LL-1014
MALLARD KATHY H & JERRY G
TAX ID: 033731
DB 1299, PG 962
DB 1187, PG. 945
LL-1015
HUM PHREY SHIRLEN
LEE & SHIRLEY
TAX ID: 012319
DB 318, PG 499
DB 1187 PG 946
LACHMAN ALLISON
SCOTT
TAX ID: 162867
DB 74, PG 36
\\
I
I
_ LL-1016 \
BU RTON ALICE K
TAX ID: 013959 \\
�aap DB 983, PG 117
P,
ern
11A
h

f \
iEE
A
EL-lilt
A
\
_ I ` LL-1027
\ � i\ \ DANIELAND JESSIE
EXISTING MORTON
GRAVEYARD I t TAX ID: 018321
/ 'r ` 1 DB 1488 PG 793
jk
LL-1018
CHMAN ALLISON SCO,. LL-1019
i TAX ID: 162869 � SCOTT CYRUS J & BETTY C > LL-1025
>� \ DB 74, PG 36 i, _;,f TAX ID: 162871 ' ' ' ' / `� ANCHORE 8153
DB 74, PG 36 - \ \ 266
.� MB 19, PG 61 - 21
\ M B 19, PG 67 ` \ EE \ '
1 LL-102 • J r 30 APPERENT S
30 S ONSLrvr
a —ELES Low ANNETTE LAMER \ LL-1026' E 111 MI
LL-10214, "� ELECTRIC MC i TAX ID: 0141174 ��o ,� EEAEE EC Mc
EASEMENT
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE EASEMENT
\ E \ SCOTT CYRUS J i DB 1205, POINT T
& BETTY C �l - 1 PB 19, PG 67 C ^ TAX ID: 073883 W J T
BENTO. 1 LLEN \ \ . EE TAX ID: 023762 \ �� ,.,� DB 3046 PG 188
LL-1020 DB 344, PG 36 • \
EUGE JR BEN TON ALLEN E \ \\ `�' PB 55 PG 1� IGz
T B 74, 368 E & BARBARA � :• A AV I�Ec�e>" we A V A � JONES ONS�ow
TAX IDB4142 ooisei y V \ �I
1 DB 4142 P \ \ t � —_ --- — �S_ A E nc
U 1L I EASEM T
OR
BURTON ICEK\ \\ s \� A, i -
TAX ID: 959 \ 30 AapAREry E \\ \ J p A - LL-1023 1028
DB 983, P 117 \ S"i"" GEORGE T. SCOTT JR. DO AND
NOS'C
LEGTRIC M
EMErvr �\ i� /� LL-10 _ A DF�,.SALONGA LL-1028
& CORA M. SCOTT
/SCfS'GEOGE JR TAX ID: 0CYRUS AND
- TAX ID 02 73 TAX ID: 023774 CECI PARKER
_ ) _ /-� o DB 589 PG 177 D884] PA. T 20126
joE S `ELir cAEEMErvT P ss Pc y-§ "0 / So- AaaAaEMr DB.4 PG
_ EOL o«R ` "` $ F ♦ D�G 642
rr
a
LL-1027
DANIELAND JESSIE
MORTON /
TAX ID: 018321 /
DB 1488 PG 793 /
/
lw
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ 6 ��

JERRY ALLEN
RAMSEY
TAX ID: 021995
DB 3268, PG 504 / I
PB 58, PG 66 /
/ ELEANOR RAMSEY
MARSHBURN, WIDOW
TAX ID: 021994 /
DB 3268, PG 502
/ PB 58, PG 66 RAM SEY & PHILLIPS /
PROPERTIES, LLC /
/ TAX ID: 021996
DB 4557, PG 757
\_ \ PB 58, PG 66 /
\ APPARENT
\ PC ;}P,ow
1 � �
LL-1035
N/F
ALLEN AND MARGARET
GOODSON
TAXI D: 008953
DB 329, PG 244
'E
LL-1034
JIMMY L SMITH
TAXI D: 024937
DB 306, PG 461
LL-1036
ANA B. NEHRING
TAX ID: 046107
DB 3011, PG 635 LL-1040
JOHN TAND P'
LL-1038 DONNA KSMITH
JOHN T. SMITH TAX ID: 020368 -�'-
AND WIFE, DB 1691, PG 567
DONNA K. SMITH _
TAX ID: 034940
DB 2971, PG 643 LL-1041'
IEll
T CARLOS F &
/ �3oAPPaRENT T TERESA S ORTEGA
"Nl ONI— TAXI : 024805
/ E NC / DB 1667, PG 604 LL-1043
ASENpS JOSHUA WILSON SMITH _
TAX ID: 003348
DB 4706 PG 95 y
/ Vl MB 73 PG 239 CABINET 0
oNEs dr: iN Na s6s6 EPA,
\ �E EASE�MEN1 a go N I LL-1047
LL-1037 �y'€ _ \ PAMELA KSTLOU IS
SARA PARKER, LL-1039
TAX ID: 028744 MARK R THOMASJ
DB 2316, PG 1 TAX ID: 020368
f t0"QB 1052, PG 868
3a APPpeIor I TAx ID: 025o08
J n � 1 1 N": i,l oB zss3, Pc 7ss
1 "Es o o°NEAPPARENTT T
LL-1042
\ EA" �\ TkINNCg 1
SUSAN ETTA SMIT� \ \.t \�-/�3 I I LL-1049
REGISTER LL-1044 MORTON JASON
TAX ID: 022241 ELLEN POWELL S ITH �` L GREGORY /
DB 351, PG 241 �4kA. ID: 02 uF \ \ • \ , I I TAX ID: 008662 /
1211, PG 44 I DB 1435, PG 962
MB 23 PG'01 SLIDE
C-309 e \ �
7 ?JLL-
1046 LL-1048
JEFFERY AND CHARLES M. AND;
BEVERLY LYNN SMITH MARIAA RUSSELL
TAX ID:024920 TAX ID: 014759 \
DB 683, PG 400 DB 3308, PG 536
02121M,,lo,lP ao,0zozo M=m,ITNEsaDzm I,,bnum,wm,,DI 1

lw
LL-1050
ALEXANDER KEITH
RAYMOND
I TAX ID: 000185
DB 886, PG 515
/
LL-1051
° AFI ' I
/ EEFSEMNro
^ /
GOODSON ALLEN R &
MARGARETW
TAX ID: 008956
I
DB 349, PG 130
1
1
I I
\M M
2
SAMMY G. G. SMIT�
I
' DOROT
SMITH
D12
TAXI 250.
DB 4560, PG 654
I a
VICK TAY
TAX ID: 016370
620, PG 1977
I
_DB
a
ILL-1054
RAMSEY
ALLENRRY
TAXI
L _ DB 349 PG 49, PG 49

APPENDIX B - AQUATIC RESOURCES AND
IMPACTS TABLES

Table 1: Aquatic Resources; Piedmont Natural Gas - Highway 17: Ramsey Road - Wetlands
Resource ID
Lattitude / Longitude
Resource Type
Classification
Acreage
Total Acreage
W-01
34.812448/-77.405509
Wetland
PFO
0.345
1.580
PSS
1.235
W-02
34.811777/-77.402643
Wetland
PFO
0.034
0.127
PSS
0.090
PEM
0.003
W-03
34.811365/-77.400699
Wetland
PFO
0.325
1298
PSS
0.973
W-04
34.810961/-77.398714
Wetland
PFO
0.064
0.301
PSS
0.237
W-05
34.810714/-77.397311
Wetland
PFO
0.142
0.630
PSS
0.488
W-06
34.810123/-77.394486
Wetland
PEM
0.146
0.146
W-07
34.810043/-77.390939
Wetland
PFO
0.053
0.113
PSS
0.060
W-08
34.810568/-77.388810
Wetland
PEM
0.239
0.239
W-09
34.811337/-77.375360
Wetland
PEM
0.002
0.002
W-10
34.810144/-77.367369
Wetland
PEM
0.002
0.002

Table 2: Aquatic Resources: Piedmont Natural Gas - Hiehwav 17: Ramsev Road - Waterways
Resource ID
Lattitude / Longitude
Resource Type
Classification
Bank Height (ft)
Width (ft)
Length (ft)
JD-01
34.812508/-77.405990
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
1
4
1374.59
JD-02
34.811734/-77.402804
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
0.5
4
179.36
JD-03
34.811294/-77.400848
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
1
4
826.66
JD-04
34.810891/-77.398711
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
1
3
250.9
JD-05
34.810659/-77.397514
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
0.5
2
505.94
JD-06
34.809751/-77.392128
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
0.5
2
1835.47
JD-07
34.810657/-77.388185
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
0.5
2
315.99
JD-09
34.811200/-77.371319
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
3
2
61.22
JD-10
34.811109/-77.371351
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
2
1
8.25
JD-11
34.810088/-77.367266
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
3
0
231.39
JD-12
34.807708/-77.359263
Jurisdictional Ditch
Ditch
2
3
50.95
S-01
34.811329/-77.375396
Stream Channel
Perennial
3
10
142.74

Table 3: Aauatic Resource Impacts: Piedmont Natural Gas - Hiehwav 17: Ramsev Road - Wetlands
Wetland Impact Site
Wetland ID
Impact Type
Lattitude / Longitude
Impact Description
Forested
Jurisdiction (Corps/DEQ)
Wetland Classification
Temporary Impacts
Permanent Impacts
W-1a
W-01
Temporary
34.812448 /-77.405509
Temporary Work Area
No
Corps
PSS
0.312
W-lb
Temporary
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.286
W-1c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.439
Corridor; Open Trenching; HDD
W-2a
W02
Temporary
34.811777 /-77.402643
Temporary Work Area
No
Corps
PSS
0.014
W-2b
Temporary
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.033
W-2c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.029
Corridor; HDD
W-3a
W03
Temporary
34.811365 /-77.400699
Temporary Work Area
No
Corps
PSS
0.143
W-3b
Temporary
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.285
W-3c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.321
Corridor Open Trenching
W-4a
W04
Temporary
34.810961 /-77.398714
Temporary Work Area
No
Corps
PSS
0.04
W-4b
Temporary
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.055
W-4c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.073
Corridor; Open Trenching
W-5a
W05
Temporary
34.810714 /-77.397311
Temporary Work Area
No
Corps
PSS
0.084
W-5b
Temporary
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.123
W-5c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.159
Corridor; Open Trenching
Temporary Work Area; Open
W-6
W-06
Temporary
34.810123 /-77.394486
Trenching Permanent
No
Corps
PEM
0.095
Maintenance Corridor
W-7a
W-07
Temporary
34.810043 /-77.390939
Temporary Work Area
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.013
W-7b
Permanent PFO Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
Corridor; HDD
Yes
Corps
PFO
0.016
W-7c
Permanent PSS Conversion
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PSS
0.009
Corridor; HDD
W-8
W-08
Temporary
34.810568 /-77.388810
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PEM
0.239
Corridor; HDD
W-9
W-09
Temporary
34.811337 /-77.375360
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PEM
0.002
Corridor; HDD
W-10
W-10
Temporary
34.810144 /-77.367369
Permanent Maintenance
No
Corps
PEM
0.002
Corridor; HDD
PFO
0.795
0.016
Totals: PSS
0.593
1.03
PEM
0.338
0
1.726
1.046

Table 4: Aquatic Resource Impacts; Piedmont Natural Gas - Highway 17: Ramsey Road - Jurisdictional Ditches
Impact ID
Resource ID
Impact Type
Lattitude / Longitude
Impact Description
Jurisdiction (Corps / DEQ)
Width (ft)
Impact Length (LF)
JD-03
JD-03
Temporary
34.811047/-77.399217
Open Trench
Corps
2.00
7.71
JD-04
JD-04
Temporary
34.811017/-77.399020
Open Trench
Corps
3.00
12.21
Temporary Work Area;
JD-09
JD-09
Temporary
34.811181/-77.371343
Corps
3.00
32.13
Open Trench
Temporary Work Area;
JD-12
JD-12
Temporary
34.807755/-77.359251
Corps
3.00
35.01
Open Trench
Total:
87.06

APPENDIX C - AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID:
STREET ADDRESS: Pipeline corridor, between Carolina Forest Boulevard and Highway 17 in
Onslow County, North Carolina
Please print:
Property Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas (holder of easement)
Property Owner: Joseph B. Keily (Project Manager with Piedmont Natural Gas
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Patrick K. Meier , of Burns & McDonnell
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
401 Executive Parkwav, New Bern, North Carolina 28562
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
3Z-
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Date: 10/9/2020

APPENDIX D - FIGURES

q�
v
_
w�er�aw.ar„q
NC 13
-
n
u5259
NC
Noise -Swamp
Jacksonville
INC 24i
-_ - 'M�nrawrco,re NC 24
INC 53
North
Figure A-1
Carolina
NORTH
General Location Map
Study Area
BURNS
�MSDONNELL"
Ramsey Road
South
1 0.5 0 1
Duke Energy
Carolina
Onslow County, North Carolina
Miles
iss�ea

z
OStudyArea
NHD Stream
FEMA Floodway
NWI Wetland Type
PEM
PSS
PFO
PUB
Riverine
Hoar"
600 300 0
600
BURNS
�MSDONNELL:
FigureA-2
NWI, NHD, FEMA, and
Topographic Ma
p
Ramsey Road
Duke Energy
FEMA 100-Year Floodplain
Onslow County, North Carolina
Scale in Feet
Page 1 of 2

fi 4
i
P
324
Gem
D132Z4
ar '1, t5I
.,,Co
O Study Area NWI Wetland Type PFO Figure NWI, NHD, FEMA, and
PEM voarH Topographic Ma
NHD Stream PUB BURNS p
PSS �MSDONNELL: Ramsey Road
FEMA Floodway Riverine 600 300 0 600 Duke Energy
FEMA 100-Year Floodplain Onslow County, North Carolina
Scale in Feet Page 2 of 2
Issuetl'

;, -- ­ I 1 �• f n7l W , , - -
41 .. . - - 11 '_ , _1% , k' 7�
ok
kM. r
W, _Xw
44
Ile
Rt'
%X
,j
��!Vat 3t . '! t� a • ':�
J iw
w
ir
W11,
. . ........ .

(0 Q
WbA
TEMPORARY
IMPACT: 0.0B4AC
W-5B
TEMPORAR
IM PACT:0.123AC
W-sC
PERMANENT CONVERSION
IM PACT:0.159AC
Wetland Impacts
PFm
NA
PSS
1.034
Stream Impacts
Perm anent
PFO
0.016
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (ft)
open Water
NA
Perennial
NlA
Total
1.05
Permanent
Jurisdictional
INA
Impact Type
Feature
Total Acreage (ac)
D10
Total
NA
PFM
PSS
0 338
0593
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (ft)
Temporary
PFO
0.101
Temporary
Perennial
IW
Open Water
0.013
Jurisdidional
OAch
87.06
Total
1.735
Total
87.06
Proposed HDD
Unimpacted Stream
Permanent Impacted Wetland
Temporary Impacted Wetland
— Proposed Pipeline Centerline
Unimpacted Wetland
PEM
PEM
1 2—�-13— 4
'5 6 7 8
— Road ROW
Temporary Impacted Stream _ PSS
® PSS
0
10
Permanent Easement
— Perennial
- Permanent PFO Conversion
® PFO
O11 Temporary Workspace
Jurisdictional Ditch
Proposed Bore Pit
W-6
TEMPORARY
(PACT: 0.095AC
Impact Figure
NORTH Ramsey Road
BURNS Duke Energy
0 50 100 `M�DONNELL"
TTSiiiiii Onslow County, NC
Scale in Feet Page 3 of 11

(7 ¢
t
t
*r . _1
NOEL
La'
wr-s
Milli 'qMEMp-
Wetland Impacts ;
Impact Type Feature Total Acreage(ac) ��PP
PFM NA .. + �•
PSS 1.034 Stream Impacts i �)
Permanent
PFo 0.01 s Impact Type Feature Total Length (ft) 'A
open Water NA r'erennial IW
Total 1.05 Permanent Jurisdictional
OAch
Impact Type Feature Total Acreage (ac) Total NA
r,
,a.
y� s>
/\ Y
PFM
0.338,__
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (ft)
-- '- •- - -: - _
PSS
0 593
Wrenn al
IW
Temporary
tw��.
PFO
0.791
Jur dct onal
OAch
8].O6
Temporary
-
-
•.
Open Water
0.013
Total
1.735
Total
87.06
Proposed HDD
Unimpacted Stream Permanent Impacted Wetland
Temporary Impacted Wetland
Impact Figure
1
— Proposed Pipeline Centerline
Unimpacted Wetland PEM
PEM
NORTH
RamseyRoad
10
—Road ROW
Temporary Impacted Stream _PSS
®PSS
BURNS
�MSPONNELL"
Duke Energy
permanent Easement
—Perennial -Permanent PFO Conversion
®PFO
0 50 100
11
O Temporary Workspace
Jurisdictional Ditch
�
Onslow Count NC
y�
Proposed Bore Pit
Scale in Feet
Page 6 of 11
aeu d 10/1/202

(0 Q
L
WS
TEMPORARY
IMPACT: 0.002AC
Wetland Impacts
Impact Type
Feature
Total Acreage(ac)
PFM
PSS
A
1.034
Stream Impacts
Permanent
PFO
0.01 s
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (f[)
op.,Weter
NA
crennol
Pl9
••ti
_.
Total
1.05
Permanent
Jurstllctlonal
Impact Type
Feature
PFM
Total Acreage (ac)
0.338
DAch
Total
NA
-- L-�- •:.
-
PSS
0593
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length
Temporary
PLO
0]9 .1
Temporary
Perennal
M9
Open Water
0.013
Jurstl clonal
OAch
87.O6
Totall
1.735
Total
87.06
M
Proposed HDD
Unimpacted Stream
Permanent Impacted Wetland
Temporary Impacted Wetland
- Proposed Pipeline Centerline
Unimpacted Wetland
PEM
PEM
1
Z 3 4
.5 0'��8
- Road ROW
Temporary Impacted Stream _ PSS
® PSS
s
10
Permanent Easement
- Perennial
- Permanent PFO Conversion
® PFO
11
O Temporary Workspace
Jurisdictional Ditch
Proposed Bore Pit
� t
e,
Impact Figure
voRTH Ramsey Road
BURNS Duke Energy
0 50 100 `M�DONNELL'"
TTSiiiiii Onslow County, NC
Scale in Feet Page 7 of 11
Issuetl'

0 Q
a u�
Y ��(�r. ♦ i d M I.x y� ..
r ►' W-10
TEMPORARY
4 • IMPACT: 0.002AC _
Y
Wetland Impacts-
ImpactType Feature Total Acreage(ac)
PFM NA
PSS 1.034 Stream Impacts
Pe rm ane nt
PFO 0016 Impact Type Feature Total Length (f[)
open Water NA r'erennal NA
Total 1.06 Permanent Jurstict onal j._• t '� -
DAch
Impact Type Feature Total Acreage (ac) Total NA
PSS 0 593 0.330
PSS Impact Type Feature Total Length (ft) ..�'r -
Temporary F�rennial NA '
PFO 0 ]21
Temporary Juristlictional g].O6 -
OpenWater 0.013
Total 1.736 Total 87.06 `I
_ Proposed HDD Unimpacted Stream Permanent Impacted Wetland Temporary Impacted Wetland Impact Figure
1 Du
keEnergy
- Proposed Pipeline Centerline Unimpacted Wetland PEM PEM NORTH RamseyRoad
2 3 4 '6 6 7 9 - Road ROW Temporary Impacted Stream M PSS ® PSS BURNS Ot
11
10 Permanent Easement - Perennial - Permanent PFO Conversion ® PFO 0 50 100 `MS DONNELL'"
nslow Count
NC
O Temporary Workspace Jurisdictional Ditch y,
Proposed Bore Pit Scale in Feet Page 8 of 11
Issuee:

a
0 ¢
U'-
!. ,i I � III'. � �V' �i � y •' p � �L.
�k
w._ } '., '. -._ s s `�a�$'l�p, � • fir.
„s r
1 r r
..t.
Wetland Impacts
Impact Type
Feature
Total Acreage (ac)
PFM
PSS
NA
1.034
Stream Impacts
Permanent
PFO
0.01 s
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (ft)
,
open Weter
NA
r'erennial
NA
Total
1.05
Permanent
Jurisdictional
Impact Type
Feature
Total Acreage (ac)
DRO
Total
NA
PM
PSS
0338
0593
Impact Type
Feature
Total Length (f[)
Temporary
PFO
0.101
Temporary
rennial
NA
Open Weter
0.013
Jurisdictional
DRO
87.06
Total
1.735
Total
87.06 -
_
Proposed HDD
Unimpacted Stream
Permanent Impacted Wetland
Temporary Impacted Wetland
- Proposed Pipeline Centerline
Unimpacted Wetland
PEM
PEM
1
- Road ROW
Temporary Impacted Stream - PSS
® PSS
10
"
' Permanent Easement
- Perennial
- Permanent PFO Conversion
® PFO
11
O Temporary Workspace
Jurisdictional Ditch
-
Proposed Bore Pit
Impact Figure
vokTH Ramsey Road
BURNS Duke Energy
0 50 100 `M�DONNELL"
TTSiiiiii Onslow County, NC
Scale in Feet Page 9 of 11
slued i

(0 Q
JD-12
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH
TEMPORARY IMPACT:
35.01FT
Wetland Impacts IN
Impact Type Feature Total Acreage(ac)
PFM NA , ^
PSS 1.034 Stream Impacts
Perm anent
PFO 0016 Impact Type Feature Total Length (f[)
open Weter NA �rennial M
Total 1.05 Permanent Juristlictional �' f
M
OAch
Impact Type Feature Total Acreage (ac) Total NA
PFM 0 338
PSS o 593 Impact Type Feature Total Length (ft)
Temporary �rennial M9
PFO 0.791 Temporary Juristlictional
Open Weter 0.013 OAch 8706
Total 1.7 55 Total 87.06 r �
-i�. j
Proposed HDD Unimpacted Stream Permanent Impacted Wetland Temporary Impacted Wetland Impact Figure
1 - Proposed Pipeline Centerline Unimpacted Wetland PEM PEM NORTH Ramsey Road
Road ROW Temporary Impacted Stream _ PSS ® PSS & BURNS y
Permanent Easement - Perennial - Permanent PFO Conversion ® PFO 0 50 100 `MS DONNELL" Duke Energy
11 O Onslow Count , NC Temporary Workspace Jurisdictional Ditch � y
Proposed Bore Pit Scale in Feet Page 10 of 11
Issued'

0 Q
Wetland Impacts
Pm A
-PP
to3a Stream Impacts
Perm anent -
PFo oo1s Impact Feature Total Length (f[) µ;
open Water NA r'erennial NA iy
Total 1.05 Permanent Juristlictional M
Impact Type
Feature
Total Acreage (ac)
0338Pss
a h
Total!NAPFM
Tength (f[)renn
Impact Type Feature
0 593
0.]91
Temporary
alNATemporary
Jur stl ct onalOpen
PFO
706
F
hot
'
Water
0.013Ouch
Total
1.735 Total
87.06
Proposed HDD
Unimpacted Stream
Permanent Impacted Wetland Temporary Impacted Wetland
Impact Figure
1
- Proposed Pipeline Centerline
Unimpacted Wetland
PEM PEM
NORTH
Ramsey Road
y
10,
- Road ROW
Temporary Impacted Stream _ PSS ® PSS
BURNS
�MSPONNELL"
Duke Energy
Permanent Easement
- Perennial
- Permanent PFO Conversion ® PFO
0 50 100
11_
OTemporary Workspace
Jurisdictional Ditch
�
Onslow County, NC
Proposed Bore Pit
Scale in Feet
Page 11 of 11

APPENDIX E - DESIGN DRAWINGS

-
>Q
0
N �
O
�U
Z
d -
CO
z
o
�
_
Q
j Z
-
LU J
wo
o�3e
O oU
_- _
= -
U
o ly-
wO
--_ -
- -
__
_
- - -
-
Lu _
ww
i
_�
-
_ _e
=
~O LJ
-_ -
Oi
Lp
gL
zO
zF
d
o�aa
-
O
6� z
a
s
_
_
- - -
¢ - - -
y
-
=
LU<
-
o,�
-
io
c
O-2
�o
¢W
s
-_
Ps
12
-LL�h-
_
OZ
zi
W t Eo
- -
_EB
-
-
-
�3a
oNa
___
rw
o5p
r�+a_.z _duma.z
ror'u�c4o .z�r
ro�mr= .�d.z=u.
hid rm
ua o
3
o G ?
6 L - -
___
-
_ - -
_
_-
LE - T
_
OF_
<on
- -
-_ -
-
-
_ -_
_-
- -
- _ G
QQ01
/-
r�
- �g
a�$r
-
-
-
-
mom'
-
��
_ -
o
-
-
=
_
a�
o'
_
-- _
-
- -
- - -
ai - = _
-_
-
8„
-
-
-
_`-
-
- - - -
__
- ___
oo - -
oF__ -
-
- -
-
_
-
-
- _ - _ _
-
-z
-' 2
2—'- __ _
_
_
- -
zw
_
--
-
_
_2 g 6 d-
_
_
-
-
o.o
0 r
..
oho
0�� r m m
-
r m e m
m

i,
W
I
1 r
E.`
1

xvnitrlH9M
9MN011a16
Imd
vlyo 3dld
3Pd0ad
? U
�oll
o
3NIl ua3doad es�e[v1s
IA —TO s..11 I'S
—OddUNBZ Vd15
AYI.anMallo roEeZ V1S
WI ua —d 9l+BY-
aN3aa3—e za a 111
ii lH aN3e at3i esvwr..
I I
Nr3uooH
.zu atide 9Nldoa �s.0 mis
ennenroo�n ses� I's10,010
9NIN011at5
00+6Z 3NIZ HDiVW
.iI 61 }}
_ d
I
E
I
O
�u a
I
Ij
IO�QN
oz tiil
I
a
I s,ea
I
s
�
az
m
at,to
m I
Ie
I
I
E
zl
I I
0.
Oda m l j
' 'N
Rz
a
i
OS+SL 3NIl H01VW
ps®
Ohi d5 b rmd
O
-
n
v v
m
�
�Oo
3
Q
-
rco
O
O -
O
o U
'^ _
V
z-
s
0.
d� Q II3Nf1
r
/
I
e
m w Q
-
_
pLLJ
z
o
m
-
U
o
s
-
H LL
w
U2��
°�zoz
Z�
w
z-j
J
O—
O Q Z
U Om
z Uz
Y
U
Q
I
I
I
16
az
Yw
�
-
-
-
NIW
£
III
p
wO
c9--
o W
G a Y
aO
'uuuo
a
loollo
S E
S
o o
m
-
5
4
troll /a
(9NINOLL0]did0�5!
3➢�Oad
inr.�triH91a

�n�.�itrix9la
9MN011a16
Mnd
vlyo 3dld
3Pd0ad
? U
z0
10
�m
.
Ho Ia �a ec.aeb
aN3ea3no.e�s.oed
00+�V
3NIl
HOiVN
E
t
`°
"'
"' o o
m
S.O
Y
s
POwa
o
a
p O w
p _
N
�U
d -
1
1
i
z -
1
w of
la0< ±i
o
o
i
1
1
mI
1
r
w
k
b
h e r o
1
Q 1
1
1
1
1
- I
o. `I
�� AIi
'I s�
1i
_ _
a
\ o
Ip
I
I�
I
E
p
w
iz
ww
d w
I
o
a
I
II
I
I
I
-
_
-
_
—
z
-
-
-
--
-
o5
-
s
—
—
-
a
Z
Z Oz
wU
H�
UQ W
2f�
O co
J m
W Ow
Z
W Z -
r �W
J o
OCD
0 Q Z
U Om
Z z
Y
U
Q
Oro
dm
az
�
�1
a
�.
y
z
a
_
a'
a
a
-
a
�w
=
NIN
ao
w
-
-
a Q
who
U 0
a
aaa
v'
��PdnDNw
�Q>
-
_
000
I
I
00+6Z
3NIl
HJ1VW
S E
S
-
4
-
Cml / ata ns
troll /a
ME
inr.�xtriH9la
9NIN011at5
ps®
Ohi d5 b Nnd
i9NINOLLv1I II-)
3➢x0ad
5

[g
/
k:
-
-j)0
\}_\)
of
)}
\
\}
<
}-
z
(
j\
}
/
(
E\}
ƒIK
\
:
\U)
§
u moo§
E
z LU
m
2�&\
\
\ CD
/z:
k }(
\A
�I
/
-
:
E
7
A
m��:�=
}
( �� \
::
-
o
)_
\\NIN
-
��
2R
j\
\
\
\ \
\ ]
!\\\}
\\
/
\\\
000
=
w
— —■|
15
:
I __
®
,�.�:[[
_
)
_

\o
._1 ,
_. d -9 VIS6\
_. ,�_��ƒ)�
_�
� \/\
I __
_
=
_
_
�
®
_
-
}
\
\10
m)
_
{
\
>
(
m
}
>
:
-
_
°
\
-
/;«
_
/
-j)0
\}_0
.
>)/
» ]
o`
:
_
\(:
\/
�\
O.>.►!
:!
?
\
\ (!
\
/--
w\\v
®
V
\
`
/
!
!
!
!
`
JC
`}}
(
\\
k
-
z j\
\ j �\
o =_:
0 co
�/ }}
2§&)
e §2)
0 -»°
C. ®§ \
z } i
:
}
�
s
;|
AM ( � ,
� .
�
�
\\
0
a
_\:
�
<'o"
:(
\
_
--
000
z
_
j §{
-�
�
i�
~
^
\\0
HDiVVN
: 2 :�\
;
:
\
�
�
- - ■� •_ `
_

�n�.itria9la
9MN011a16
NOd
vlyo 3dld
3➢d0ad
? U
o
x
p O w
O _
rcO
�U
Z
d -
_
Q
_
Z
—
_
J
Z 0-
0 ~ -
a \ ^ ati ti�rdwLuLZ
OZ
�Q=
a t
s
r�W
zJ w
IQ u
_
�
-- i
oo
I
z
—
OJZ=
Q
U O m
Z
U z
�
—
is
No,ua3doad
1d y
roiio aNndaiNao 11.11 v
\
ww
E m
g
s Y
�y
az
Q
lul
OQ
Yg
QO�
Ow
o
o�
oQ�
--
ti l z l
-
3rvn ua3doad —9 v
_ z
I I
o
_
_
.�vvaNaa,,a ee.ea.v
o u
IN3 — �� e���a Is
_
-
-
w w
z
o
IN101 �,N3aoa s�.�'ds
ww
tr9 lz
w
oao -�
0
°w
0
w
Qo�z
z
-=
��oz� St � ,
QQ�
OQQ
w
aN
INIodoN1111 oIs
-s-
���3Naa,0 �.� a
+
-I
o
10=
s
oo+ss 3N11 HOivw
000
yam
—
rm ma ns
Z
9NIN011a,5
ps®
Ohi d5 b Nnd
(9NINoLLe,Sado,S!
3➢�Oad
s
inr.�triH91a

�nl.itria9la
9MN011a16
NOd
vlyo 3dld
3ad0ad
? U
srx-e
a350daad 01 M-311 [5.90 V15
1, II�aN3e a,31i,c bz.oe V15
n.ua3doad
J
IYLa 3NIM31N3a Z9.C6.V15
Wd11o,,0 61- V
T59 9L.oA V
1NIOd L%3aad -9L V15
NI-3ll aoa
aN3ed O N'
HO—NI-INK O-L VV15-
od.o, Is
X -44w
UNE 88+00 - o O<
MpZCN
o QOQ
w�
I Q 0
�£
0 -� —
xs IIownavaawLwamaNn
� +jam
£OdoXo� w
<�oo y
w UF omm I I <
o oz�oo
ao
<
` a I
0 a0.
al I
I
�
1
e
m�
I
s
i
maw
_ IIII
Q
Q
10
OZI `
ir F
wQ
O D U
Q
G z
I
'.sl
ir
0 w 4x
\\\\ Z
z
Q
ir
e
oo+ aNn H3ivw
e
E S o o m
oo
+
�
N
m
�y
^Ow
=0s
o
-
_w
-
_
-
-
rg
_
;
o
-
_
a
o
m0
z CO
U
—
C9
-
NIN
I
���
I
I
II
Q
JQ -
H � 0Q Z
u1Uo
0 U)
J�0
Lu
Z -
00>�
0 J Z=
C) 0
z cn w
Q
B y
S
0m
dm
YK
7Z
Ow
o
u�GOWZ
Q
-
ZO
a a U
O
Q d
'a G
G G
-
10,010
---
ll,ILNaa,,�
�Qw
i
I
e e m
yam
-
m �ma ns
Ill Itria90
9NINO-1
ps®
N d
Ohi d5 b
(aNlNo 0]dido,)
31�Oad
5

Avn.itrlHaM
aMN011v16
Nrd
vivo idle
3Pd0ae
? U
m
"'
w
�`w
_
'ia IW aN3e a,3� et IS
1NIOd -N346H [9KU IS
Nroa aaH
oNaeaa„o zb 66
otls,fi IS,,—z6«m tlis
zNnuazdoad
-lillH
ON35tl3n0 d4 t6.bF tl 1S
illH13VIlNe1a33d0ad Z5.6fitl15
1NIOd—N300H 96.6E IS
-11
areea3no.zlB
e;:roa to eb.9s Is
A1nIN Otl3Ha3n0 60 e6'15
avn uaadoad z9 ee v
omit=_nma,o e�.efi v
Atll�nlaalq e9.96 v1s
A1nIN Otl3Ha3n0 L9.9fi d15
3vn ua3doad eb.9e'vi5
AmAen�aa,n vsfi tl
BIO lfaH se 3(3a
ue� IS
nu111H11,11
n avaeaa to 9s sfi wi,
3VIl A1a3d0ad f6.96'tl1
n IW aN3e o,3a..61 ez.6e v
93„na
�,LLN39LL,3�.�9�me�B
. 1N39O,3L.OVSZ ¢ `s
H011a,h euz6.dt.9
0 oaaaxave vnnn Is.ae vae
n HO11Olq ¢Z.Zfi d15
.LLnlln Otl3Ha3nO fil.Zfi tl15
O L 4l 96 tl15
3NIO1 .611a3d Dad
H'J11 LLN319a3103.8 is
69.69 tl
—a,h 16.99 d16
3vfl A1a3d0ad te.BA d19
_
OS+Z01 3N1� HJ1VW
I '
IQ23
�o; �
lo..I
I
o -1 w
�W
—� d W
G I
_ �' =
I
�-7
m ,III II I
-1
s' i 11
1a
I � I
/ II
/\�- � �Jx3 P
rti..`T I T I I I
i`J I
Ip
I
I
-- — xo' _J I
oo a
I
_ 9
o�
q U •kZf
U o �
o Y' -
a /
Pp _t � x � d �
,IIM PARKER o Id
- - -
M/a ��/n-� I '
au
lz o
ZUU
Q 8/ m X
W �SI I` d Xmd �YQ
s lI I OQ
lo
o
S /
&�_is rtm z z / a
�/ /
00
3N11 Hilvvo
p
—
o o m
0 kW I
/
-
N w
£
Niw
e
I
`
�
dA11 NlN
llololo
I
m n
n
Y
mO3
�0'
ti
�Oz
�Qo
?Qo
O
Q
-
rc Lo
0
0 z
p _
O
I
mY
w Q
oo
�0
m
¢
m
-
_
zp
—
—
-
-
_
_
J
O
z z
0 �Q
Lu w U
' 1
O ZOo a
LLJ cc
w
z J
0 J 5
Q W
z
U z
�. Y
xfi .
I6
��
O m
�w
ow
r
oa
��
m
56 Y
mom
--
a
—
—
26 Y
o
�
-
io
Q
OIN
QU
o
-
¢tl OUZ'
w O
i
�Qd
moo
- -
69 Y
_ 99 IS
G
i G m
4
3
En
/mx Iwrc a
P.ml / atv.
AYP.ftr1HaM
aNIN011tl15
Ns '�
� NVId
t9MNOLLtl1s 3d0,91
3lnoad

Avn.itr1HNM
NMN011a16
Nrd
v1v03d1e
3➢d0ae
? U
o
Q
rc 0 w
0 _
00+SII 3NIl NJ1VW
Z —
'1a III eonll.vle
o
Ow
Q
-
o
aNN3�f.sb
11 IH19N!,I! 3T0 111CI�V,11
1
� w 0 n
��I
(��SNIllH.56 bd.El l'tl16
'1't IHl
�w
Da
o
ON3H m3H�s5Bsr
'1'a1H1 aN39 O131a35l OLuf�31o05
-INTO -111
'la IHlaNaa Olald.E 5S.fl l'tl1B
��.� p
� �•:� � n
�� ���`} a
Yom
=Oo
_
z
Z 0
-fll
It:Aaee,uaa�n
zs.eu.rls
-_
I
0 Q
F
1NIaN3gry33o aH EtZO.ElV
w U
Q w
1
NI-I—H
//
(� Z =
VLS
0�
w~Ow
Q'wZLLi
�' a
ma>3ivaoan zD.zul.ms
x w
Z J o
1
Aama,wa,p xl.zll.es
'i
0 Z
oS
lss,s
c) 0
Z (n z
— z
Y
w
INn Ata —d xs.11 l els
Aamamaaap se.ul.rLs
___--'I
�
�
-lll
�
wox
E
_
sQ�
a
aNn uaaaoaa ee ou ais
-
E
w
__' w z
_
a
c �
O-
E m
- olavis
O�ow
�gl
vio
am
.muartaa�a oo.olldls
�' a 0
az
�ox
i
w g
�w
ww
s
PdnD
0,>„s
ow
aNn uaaaoaa usol.vs
Dx.aOl
zp
ow
o
O
���
N,3ua3 obd s oLL' fs
_'s
= p
s
w
L
6
-
LLa1n3aLLH0s.n01,
nfHl INluLL.so ol.eol dls
I a lin
—
F 9IELEI-bf z -
ui r£
p
NIN
R
m
-
o
—
Dl
£
UNIad3Ha3sn
�Owa
V Z
�� i
lwoa mlNa aax omlm dl5
FT —I
aNaeaa,.oal ea.am .
z-.eea
-�
- _
-_
-
-
`
I
I
3Nft ua3dbad S9.SOl.dL9
o
W
QQd
O O
Q Q
O
gg S
O Q
F
3Nft —1011 01+101 d15
.AAVI��
UU
U
V ��
IVtlYi0N11NtlNlYJ SJ.s0V d15
aAl
/�'X
-O�
of V1s
\��Fp(t,
GAS f iZ-.Zza
-
10N —AN 11n01 11
� �x/+
I
o
/ Od
Q
��5
-
m
T
--
-
1Nlod-I Gal O-Ol VLS
-zo•�
_
os+zoa aNn HDivw
37
10,010
010,10
000
o o
maw
-
P.ml / atv.
AYP.ftr1HaM
aNIN011tl18
NVId
t9MNOLLvls 3do,91
3llj0ad

Avn.itrlxnM
nMN011v16
Nrd
vivo idle
3➢d0ae
? U
o
p
x
O w
o
09+6Zl 3NIl HO1VW
N v v
m
m
ry
0_
—
_
o
Qo
(fl
o
Nrlli
O
ms
1NIOd Aa1N3 a0H 99.8Z1 tl
dAl)QD
NI
_
I
aN3ea3na se s9.azl tl
'nIN1IN- F] v se ez dl5
: � %
z
—
_
—
Z
o
9.l
oaf—NN11 III is
azl IS.I
m,z
—
�
iNloa naiNaan
Nr311 nnH
oN3ea3,.o.el 9um.v
o
—
Q
��
IQ
—
11PUJ
Avuann,a,,o ze.¢l tl
O
a
3zN3o
La Hn3Nua3eoaaNa
:�,
--
_
Q
W c)
Lu
.l
0
>s
b
J
W Ow
Allllln 9tl3ua3A0 9Z.9z1'tlls
w
p
WZ Z�
AY413/JNOI,'.l 99.911 tl
—
t
3
� W
_
�
Q Z
n3aNr93tlil atlsa
i�u1stl
�N
az �
—
U O
z�
_
a
U z
F
w w
it HlMIS-1N_e 9x.ezl'tlss
aN3e�nove os.ozl tl
a
u �$
Q
w ���i�
< a
ice! _
_
—
NI
—
Em
sl1—
az
a of
�.
3Nnua31oa-111'.IS
ow
IS
oo
ww
^i
ww
gOw
—
0.0
oQ o
I
�Q
i�
i
<
Q10
—
w �
0
��-
-
a doaQ�
o
uuu
3N11-1 ad xl.all mis
¢I
s
I
—
�U
a � s
1,al°N3°-11.1111.91111
i1a1waN3ew,311.9111.911.,ss
vw�=N
Pml / my
AYP.�ftr1HNM
NNINOIltlls
Ns ''
b, NVId
l9NINOLLv1s3d0�91
3lljnad

Avo.1trl111a
NNIN011v11
N,
vivo idle
"Noll
rcR
o
i
W
—
o
O _
O
�U
�bQ
o
�Fw
3Nn ua3dadd E6.1k1..,1s
oo+zol 3Nn
�—�.�
I
HJ110 �q et.VtV d1S
kvtaNaovh o9.V[V d16
/'�' l.�
,,/ I I
_
Q
z
-lVllbls
3Nn A1a3dnad 99.1k1'tl18
/
_
ail
Sm
Z O z
dQ
I I
O
O�Q
LL
w U
Qw
I I
OULu �m
J~O
z
wz
z w
3Nn ua3doad 99se1:ms
unIID Ov3Ha3n0 Zs.6EV 11
§ I
t,
a
r W V
Z J
CD J o
o
O
z
(
���
/ I
'`I
—
QZ
0
anon oH31a3;o ls'ael.als
In,n
3NII -cad .0E1b13
LLN3sa3nn.919s.0E1 v
�
i
NIw
Z z
U
Q
b.E
ol
/
�Um
-dead
z ee
a
I
3Nn 6.Lc1 v 1s
1.1—I,n c-11 v
—
c-2
0-2
wl bls
�y
rx
az
_
a
/ a
0
3Nn -11oad
.1YY'dNaalYJ 15.0EV tl
� m
—
_
�
C41b15
�
_
0.
=P.
d
3Nn I.Il1 IN
AY�4dNa01O 90.SEltl
O al
pp
—
icl b15
VY
N+111 o1H
1N111 Aa N3 a.H 15 11.d11
o
m
_
d20
o
o
I
NIWo
II
o
—
3Nn -Odd ws
bs
_
u103E
AY�m"N'ln 11+11,
nN33a3,tn,E 61.�1 v
� �' �
I
= I \
met
0.
-EIb
=1
Q
a
m
w
1a IHI9NIul3 so sa.eeV w13
3Nn w�oa oe.zsl
a
ww
N
��
�
'it IHI sw
X W
o'
<~
o
u o p
a
sas's ao.'e1 v1S
x
1e1 I,
sad
x
1NInd 01tt3 OnH 00.?EV:tl15
aN3 al earpii oaH
.maaNao�n eulcl:ms
=
z
vt
I
o
-
a H J,'
s
-ll➢Ov3Ha3n0 E IE1 tl
—
AvuaNna�a as.zel a
O
o
unlln NIHa31G 061611
09+6ZL 3NIl H07H
ZGml
000
i G m
4
a
/ atsn ns
P.ml / atsn
AY13tr1HaM
aNIN011v18
Ns '1
7 NVId
19MNOLLv1s 3dOt91
3ln0ad

�anitrix9la
9MN011a16
Najd
alao 3dld
3Pd0ad
? U
o
p
x
O w
�9NE �56kp0
� �
o o
m
m
z
C
„I9In 36�ti �l 6 664 y
��
CD
i
o
♦
�
Q
�mw
�o
I
J
O z
o a
o.
�,-
w
o
o
0 <
��
:
WW
H u1 U
Q W
•
(
U2Zo
O
tis
p z
LU
I
-
_
r � W w
orvaeeano,b o9.m aI
J w
Z J o
.msz
1
O->�
Z
3rvl,.ua Idatid 5i is� y15
1 ----
-
J
-
Q
z O w
dn`s�
o
s
Y z
unun avaxa3no 9easlms
o
—� �
a
r
�F
w
p
wwz
oz
„ m
c-2
0-2
oa
a
—
Q
\I
3NIN—Odd9..6
,66
Yw
--
Ow
3NI-111-1111
o
MOT
-Olo
_
1j
1
--
m
�o
I
a
i
o
ol
1
= �Ii
�
-
o
.lati3nroa,,oa.zbl..,u
IIIo
I
_-
o
o`a ii
s
Hail— W. bl 1
•
—
—
tr
3NIl,LL`d3d0dd OS-4 tl16o
1
cq
.1tlY'dNt101,'J EL.964.d16
��•k
o
¢0000
F
z
♦
¢
¢ a
ow
uucai
�w
i
V
Q
J�
m �
3rvn.ua3aoaa xz.sbl.rss
3Nn 33ai el rnl ais
,♦
��/
Q
�
�
s�
�
a
I
v
.1vYaNda S,� s5.bbl Is
S�
o
3
sbl 11
I
d
I
&
.111a l,N Ie.EDI Is
g
d
o
a
.1
rc
—
—
p
3NIl A1a3d0ad Ll.fbl tl
I
_
lololo
JNIOdi—sil 6s.11l a
000
aN36a310 z be zbl a ., .
gOo
000
m
Oo+Zbt
—
o
3NIl H�1VW
4
—
Cml / Ota ns
troll /O
—
inr.xtrix9la
9NIN011at5
ps®
Ohl d5 b Nnd
i9NINOLLa1s3dO15)
3➢x0ad
5

Avn.itr1HNM
NMN011v16
Nrd
vivo idle
3Pd0ae
? U
o y
a
p 0
p _
9
rc 0
�U
Z
d -
�a
a
o
Z
d
-
J
0 � Q
a
0
U)
W z O z
�wz�
w
W
aNaeaanossa«ss�.nis
e e m m
� (j J
x,al area m�i���oet s�uis
x
a
OQZ�
Z
�.o
'o o
a
�o
Y
�a1w�Nu�u�sosi°. s�'°s
�Ia,� sn�a� Yes
o �Q
-
-
O
U
Q
o
�n rW�NLLLIf�s�o a6. ems
anima
�w � �
�� � ww
Noilain ws«us�.vis
ri�oa avon as«�s�vis
ol
t- -LiVM COOP RD
� .l_
-
o
I�
4 j
z
-min m3H— 11-1 vis
a
_ n
6,A
6
J
-
@
'IH)9Nlula.306 sNi� 9� viS
is lH)aN3e oi3li.Lz to«�9�.ris
—
x� _ \
— 1 ._CY `I
J>
—
0-2
E f
� Y
94 Y
n nuaN3e a,3e.nz ns+oe�wis
s ��
�E
�
-.a
NSW
Fw
-
Ow-
oz
o
ao
az
4w O� } o
wa
G
�a d
-
-
-
-
o
�w
t
Nw
`i
-
_
\� .coo
-
�aow�M
_
oQ
0
's
oa
-
�5 a moo
a
a d
a�
o
MP cN
-
s
Yea
�a>
MOO
maw
P.ml / my
AYP.ftr1HNM
NNINOI1v18
Ns '�
� NVId
l9NINOLLv153dOt91
3lIjONd

Aan.1trl",I
NNINOI1tl11
Nrd
alao 11,
3tH0ae
o
p _
4
rc 0
�U
o
Z
d -
_
Q
z
-
J
0 � Q
� a
0
(/)
J�0m
W z z
z
W Z
<-
w
��W
z J w
arvo s�
-
o
e e m m
Q Z
Z
P ais
11uni n3e m�os a .on
9 da33�0�powtL
f �P
�w
_
m o m
Z (n
=
alS
i oo n4 w
y „+
Y
pz
'1�H1 ON39 Q131f .VL le+6BL dls
` '
1
Q
O
\
Q o
rQw
U
C0-2
.ltlu�3NNal,J u+B9L d15
/—�\ \� o W
s
W
NbW i
_
/
/
Ey
Nry
az
1NIod 11%3 aaH 00+991'tl15
y LL
m
3 111 IS
a 15'
5
Q _
o
G
Ha La TO is+[9l a15
I
0
_
a
M 131N11TO Za+[01 tl15
'M A31Nl1
z
HNLa ll0 5b+991 a
3Nn ua 1——
llt11N1 H .3 p1 Lese� 11
. usse�ais
c5
Bel _
al
-
d
.muaNaazo vs re� a
o�
owo I `I� <
� I
eQo
- _
-
-
-
-
o
-
-
-
aNn unaeoae ce+ee� ais
030
d o o E
o�
I �o�
-
I
I
s
I
-
xa
zx
-
-
--
AauaNaaz,o a
Nw
aioaaw
o
a a
o
a a
o o
o �.�
-a
d�"
3Nn Atn3doad o z
�N,
s
-ow
_
f9u _
y
1111IN
LLN3xa3so,z� xl
ri,
oo+ssL 3Nn HDTV
I-
o
a
IS
MOO
tea=
P.ml / atv.
AYP.1tr1HNM
SNINOIlals
Ns '�
� NVId
l9NINOLLa153dOt91
3lHONd

WT. WH ITEHEAD DR
NRAMSEV
RD
LIMITS OF PROPOSED 8"
DISTURBANCE RAMSEV RD
PIPELINE
/
_aDi
0
]•oo
a•00 0•00
13•00 ,4.00 -
,0.00 , •o0 12.00 - -
5.0
TERRY LEE LAMER DR
/ 3.00 4.00 5.00 s•00 _ -. _
d
— --
SITE LOCATION MAP
RAMSEY RD
1-
says,-1000 Q
6'ROCK
=
NOTES'.
-----_-- ---_----- CHECK DAM
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
6'ROCK
- OUTLET
NOW PAVED AREAS. IN PAVED AREAS.
WATTLE
x CHECK DAM
OUTLET
- y
COMPOST SO ALL STALLED.
LL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE
2. AREMAIN
6' ROCK
JIM_
PROTECTED CITH TREE PROTECTION
— CHECK DAM
OUTLET
-
FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHALL BE 4' ORANGE MESH FENCE
PIECED ALONG THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE(LOD)
3. ANY DISTURBED AREA LEFT IDLE FORA
PERIOD OFI SEEDING LONGER SHALL
N
, USE MATT ING WITH IN
J JUR ISDICTIONAL AREAS
SE STABILIZED GITH MULCHING AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING WITH THE
1 (TYR ALL)
EXCEPTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
_
_ --
'WHICH ONLY NEED STABILIZATION TO
THEPATENT REQUIRED TO AVOID TOP
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE____
_ -- _ ___ _____ _ —
w
AIRING AI
a. REAL SHALL BE
o
o
POLO ERNS____ O____
_
_____--__ _
2]+00 _ --
____--�+�— _ _ ---
z
SEEDED BEFORE
PERSEED
CTCLOSEOUT.BUT. PERMANENT
+
— OOT ____ __P _____ _____
-
�+w ---
2 0.. —__ _
— c>
— -- -
<
IN
SEEDING NCEWIESEEDEDC
ACCORDANCE WITH NORTH cARouNA
n.od 11.11 z,+w
,s•oo ,s•0 ,0 0
__—__ ----- ----
---
�
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
w
z
---OFF ----- LOU -----Loo----- LOU ----- ----- -- — -----
— __
___--
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
x
SECTION 11
5. REFER TO PNG-C-026-0001168
5 RAMSEY RD _-
PNGL-0260001169 FOR ES&P
SILT N ENTRANCES C DETAILS.
6 ICONSTRUCTIO FENCE CHECKMS,
—
WATTLE WATTLE
—=_—
- —' ROCK
AND
_'_�_
OUTLET AM
tiff S# 6 CHECK _
..
CHECK DAM O�
OUTLET
�,
Q'
A�
CONPOST SOCKSTIANDDLES PIRIOR TO
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY ALL BLIPS
MUST BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN
CONSTRUCTION
PLACE UES L ENAND D SITE
ACTIVITIES IS
FERMAN ENT SEEDING.
�
1
•
DISTURBED AREAA8ILIZED'WITH
LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA. 17.30 AC
POINT OF CONTACT (MAINTENANCE).
JOSEPH KEILY (252}63AR240
N
d-{PK PV
'�; g,:
OF PROPOSED 8"
LIMITS OF DISTURBHNCE
DISTURBANCE RAMSEV RD—
LLEGEND:LIMITS
EXISTING CONTOUR
PIPELINE_____
__________ _____
.. \'VETLANOS
T^30w0
FTEMPORARY
SILT FENC-0.
31+00
32+00 33+00
___._.. - __. _.-
34.00
-
_.. sw0 33+0
38+00
000
w
v
1M1ATTLE �1
1 �
----- —
z
6'ROCK
ENTRANCE
CLOTH&GRAVELINLET PROTECTION
CHECK DAM RAMIFY' RD
OUTLET
_
ROCK CHECK DAMS
WATTLE 6'ROCK
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION
CHECK DAM
OUTLET
WATTLE --
- —
'WETLAND LIA71MG �µ
6ROCK
PERMANENT SEEDING
CHECK DAM
OUTLET
TEMPORARY SEEDING
-
ISSUED FOR BID
0]-10-2020
1I1-wFT
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
REF. DWG(S)
ITY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS FACILDRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095)' DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED
DATE "TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE' WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIVI) POLICY 1001
xo DnrE
aENsioxlsl DEscamnox
er
cxx
naaD
DEsca1
x1853""
NCDOT 17 RELOCATION
SHEETS) 22OF29 DWG SCALE AS NOTED
ZEST
AOS1S2020
ISSUED FOR 90%DESIGN REVIEW
VP
MMT
CAM
AREA CODE
%X;XXI20X%
"""'+
12�1012010 SUPRSEDED —
-
�� H
Piedmont
ES&PC PLAN
B 0821-2020
ISSUED FOR BID
VP
MMT
CAM
ACCOUNT NU SEER
PRodECTNUMBEN
0229512
°""
"°"'"
'xxx
x
DR—INDxUMDEa
V�
aDB N
XX 6xx
Y.
s
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PNG—C-026-0001120
DRATInNGBv
K
STATION ID
%;XXGRXX
X%%
R'KFESSg44LHJG/ARCH STAiAP
NEW BERN RESOUCE CENTER. NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKER INITIALS NILIT

�
o
xs
PROPOSED 8"
RAMSEV RD PIPELINE
��
r
RAMSEV
0RD
0
—
- 44•00- ----- 45.00
00 ----- 4]•ss
SITE LOCATION MAP
Ea lE 1=10C O
RHMSEV RD
NOTES.
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
N0N PAVED AREAS. IN PAVED AREAS.
COMPOST SOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED.
6ROCK
CHECK DAM
OUTLET
2. ALL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE
PROTECTED WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHALL BE 4' ORANGE MESH FENCE
ALONG THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
ISTURBANCEDAR
{�
3. AN1'DISTURBED AREA LEFT IDLE FORA
PERIOD OF I4 DAYS OR LONGER SHALL
BE STABHIZEDVIITH NIULCHINGAND
N
TEMPORARY SEEDING WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
',HIGH ONLY NEED STABILIZATION TO
PROPOSED
POLE TO BE
RELOCATED
THE PATENT REQUIRED TO AVOID TOP
RAMSEV
{ STUBBED AREAS SHALL BE
o
PIPELINE
NENTLY SEEDED BEFORE
BES
_ _ _ _
____-Doi---
/OL
CT CLOSEOUT. PERMANENT
+ ____ //
�^ lSgp LU-LOT
�oD
w LaD� �
__-- _�
Damn- GOT -vi -- aoT--�g.Oo-aoT-----aoT 55•es---aoT----sawoT-----aoT -sae[?--aoT-----�q0s----aoT--�aO%00T-----a
Lou- Lout � Lou__ D_____Lw-- z-Nro---__Lox_-__-L-ou_-�
UI--9®T ___- _ ou__--.
LSD
-'---
T51aii___aoT----si,
_----__ Lou___ u____ -Lou_____LAu_____ Lou__
z
J
IN
NG AND SE IMEEDEDN
AOCORDANALL
CE NORTH CAROUNF
EROSION EDIMENT CONTROL
DESIGN MANUAL
_
6'ROCK
2Lf5PY FD
-- -__ - -__ -- _- - ---
_
- RAM1ISEV RD-
-__ - -_
SECT11
REFER TO PH-C-02 000116e-
R ES&PC AILS
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE FENCE,OCHECK DAMS,
CHECK DAM
OUTLET
WATTLE -
- _ -- _
-__ _- � �-,---
- WATTLE _-
__ '_ _ - - _-_
gyp ''- ----
/ 11''19
_ =
-_- - _ _ --
---- -
WATTLE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, INLET
PROTECTION ,\ 1TLANDNIATTING.AND
COMPOST SOCUSI WADDLES PRIOR TO
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL BLIPS
MUST BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN
•
-.....
- .
PLACE UHALF END OF CONSTRUCTION
AERMANENT SEEDING. STABILIZED 'WITH
PERLANENT SEEDING.
LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA'. 11.30 AC
POINT OF CONTACT (MAINTENANCE)'.
JOSEPH KEHY (252)-6311240
LEGEND:
Z
GUYWRETO
BE RELOOCATEDCATED
PROPOSED8"
RAMSEV RD GUY WIRE TO ,
PIPELINE BE RELOCATED
---LOD--- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
------- EXISTING CONTOUR
I� � n ao
n -
- - -.1 WETLANDS
--- UOLI ss• 00
o _
6] 00 ss•ea A i of
--
-- LOU- -�1ap �
TELIPORHRV SILT FENCE©
WATTLE `
WATTLE J
RAMSEY RD
WATTLE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CLOTH GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
oo\
ROCK CHECK DAMEm
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION µ
'WETLAND MATTING
1
fiWATTLE
PERMANENT SEEDING Eµ
ISSUED
FOR BID
TEMPORARY SEEDING
0]-102020
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
REF. D'WG(S)
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS FACILITY
DRAVIINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL
(OM-1095)" DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED
DATE 'TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE' WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIND POLICY 1001
-
R'KFESSgJ4LHJG/ARCH
STAiAP
xo DnrE
xENsioxlsl DEscxmnox
er
cxx
naaD
DEscx1
x1853""
NERGY ��� Piedmont
��EDU E
NCDOT 17 RELOCATION
p (�
ES&PC PLAN
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NEW BERN RESOUCE CENTER . NEW BERN, WORTH CAROLINA
SHEETS) 230F29 D'WG SCALE AS NOTED
AOS1S2020
ISSUED FOR 90%DESIGN REVIEW
VP
MST
CAM
AREA CODE
XX;XXQOX%
"""'+
DWG DHTE 12�1612010 SUPERSEDED
B 0821-2020
ISSUED FOR BID
VP
MST
CAM
ACCOUNT NU SEER
PROJECT NU M PER
0229512
°""
xx�xxl2Dxx
"°"�
'xxx
"
DR-INDNumsER
PNG-C-026-0001121
DIIN
REB N
By
JJK
STATION ID
X;XXI20XX
%%%
CHECKER INITIALS NILIT

LIMITSOF
GUY WIRE TO - DISTURBANCE
- BE RELOCATED PROPOSED 8"
RAMSEY RD
o
+ - - - --- PIPELINE
---
GUY WIRE TO _
BE RELOCATED �- _AF
-ooT---- w. _--
---- pO s�G�iOO--
00+
-_--PARKERR
j
DRUMMER
KELLUM RD HIM
D
v
^-----DOi-1 16+00 ]]+oo- 10+00eo+oo 01+00 02+00 &3+00
_
U
- - ---OR.,
z LOU -- LOU _____L __ _ _____ __ _ _____
- -- -
6'ROCK
CHECK DAM RIT r`Ro RAMSEY RD
WATTLE OUTLET — - — — - - - -- wATTLE
6ROCK
CHECK DAM
__---
_____ 6'HOCK
CHECKDAM
OUTLET
_ _� J
r
RAMSEY
SITE LOCATION MAP
saLe.1 10CJ Q
- OUTLET
_—
-_-----...
-
NOTES
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
NON PAVED AREAS. IN PAVED AREAS.
COMPOST SOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED.
2. ALL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE
PROTECTED CITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHALL BE 4' ORANGE MESH FENCE
PLACED ALONG THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE(LOD)
3. AN1' DISTURBED AREA LEFT IDLE FORA
N
GUY WIRE TO BE RELOCATED
PERIOD OF 14 DAYS OR LONGER SHALL
BESTABHI bVITH MULCHINGAND
TEMPORARY SEEDING WITH THE
- _ _ LIMITS OF
EXCEPTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
_ DISTURBANCE
-.I
'WHICH ONLY NEED STABILIZATION TO
THE EXTENT REQUIRED TO AVOID TOP
-• �� ��_ ss.ss ��-_
c2i _
CA'_ __ -Do-g'r+0a--
--L
- o„IL__DOT__gD'ev' ,__--LW
WATTLED - ----- -
�\s+c0
-
_Do
_---+Ja+�2-- -_~m;Lo __-- 9D2+
Lob_- o --- I
_--- --- o
1
SOIL AP SHIN
4. ALLDISTURBEDAREASSHALLBE
PERSEEDED BEFORE
PROJECT CLOSEOUT. PERMANENT
AEEDING HALLBH SEEDEDIN
CAROLINF
EROSIONANDSEDIMENT CONTROL
PLHNNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
SECTION 6.11 .
5. REFER TO PNG-C-026-0001168-
-0
PNGA GOOD1169 FOR ES&PC DETAILS.
15' PERMANENT
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS,
�WATTLE
EASEMENT
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, INLET
J
WATTLE
PROTECTION ,\ IETLANDVIATTING, AND
6' ROCK RAMSEY RD RD
CHECK DAM 6' ROCK
COMPOST SOCUSI WADDLES PRIOR TO
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL BLIPS
OUTLET CHECK DAM
MUST BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN
OUTLET
PLACE UNTIL END OF CONSTRUCTION
PRO POSED 8"
ACTIVITIES AND SITE IS STABILIZED' WITH
RAMSEY RD PIPELINE
PERMANENT SEEDING.
LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA 11.30 AC
POINT OF CONTACT (MAINTENANCE).
JOSEPH KEHY (252}6311240
N 6' ROCK
LIMITS OF CHECK DAM
DISTURBANCE OUTLET
O
2� PROPOSED 8"
GUY WIRE TO RAMSEY RD a
BE RELOCATED -^
PIPELINE
15'PERMANENT GUY WIRE TO
EASEMENT BE RELOCATED
_
LEGEND:
---LOD--- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING CONTOUR
- - - _ _ _
WETLANDS
o o
`
im.cc o
DOOo-� -L o- ---
103.- - - h19WT- __ Q Yoo-m9� LOD_____ ___S ---LOU----
- 'LOD- LOD- - LOD-LOD ___
Z
o0 0
ooi_-_--aoi_____a _____--__ �^a _
LOD_____ L D
o-____LOO - -_-____LOO-- WATTLE
z
TEMPORARY SILT FEN
L 1 1M1'N ENT
CONSTRUCTION ENTRHNCE��,
Z ------ N
x
CLOTH& GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
RALISEY RD
WATTLE
ROCK 6'a
CHECK DAM
ROCK CHECK DAMS
'^
OUTLET
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION„
^
WATTLE
WATTLE
'WETIAND MATTING
• •
PERMANENT SEEDINGµ
-
ISSUED FOR BID
07-102020
TEMPORARY SEEDING
y®
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
REF. D'WG(S)
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095)" DRAWING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE' WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIVI) POLICY 1001
-
B R'KFESS9VLEJGA1A CHSTAiAP
Dn1E
xENsioxlsl DEscxmnox
er
A.
naaD
DEsc 1—
x1853
S ENERGY. Pied eoGas
NCDOT 17 RELOCATION
ES&PC PLAN
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NEW BERN RESOUCE CENTER. NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEETS) 24 OF 29 D'WGSCALE AS NOTED
A
A OS1S2020
IS SUED FOR 90% DESIGN REVIEW
VP
MMTCAMAREA
CODE
"""
""""
DWG DATE 121612019SUPERSEDPROJECTNUMBER
B 0821-2020
ISSUED FOR BID
VP
MMTCAMACCOUNT
NUMBER
o229512
°^"
�LL
"
D�w�xoxDMDER
PNG-C-0260001122��BxSTATION
��e�DRAvwNG
By
JJK
ID
XX XXGR
CHECKER INITIALS LILIT

0
10
M
0
a"Y2g.gx--aoi----+WIDG-----aoi 12gwa ��— o FARRIS LN RAMSEV RD
�—L 129 w
WATTLE
WEBSTER LN
SITE LOCATION MAP
NOTES
FP 1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
NON PAVED AREAS. IN PAVED AREAS,
11111 O REMAIN SHALL
A L STALLED.
2. ALL TREES TOREM1SHALL BE I ST
BE
PROTECTED WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHALL BE A ORANGE MESH FENCE
PLACED ALONG THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE (LOD)
3. ANY DISTURBED AREA LEFT IDLE FORA
PERIOD OF 14 DAYS OR LONGER SHALL
BE STABILIZEDW'ITH NIULCHINGAND
TEMPORARY SEEDING WITH THE
PROPOSED8" L EXCEPTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
RA SE RD
WHICH ONLY NEED STABILIZATION TO
PIPELINE 1+ ��-10Rfl GNNr G� .DES G`\ '\ Z THE EXTENT REQUIRED AGAYED TO AVOID TOP
R G ALLDSOIL S UR EDAREA
Ma N�, PGA QN� SM\ p36a Q PX \M1j 4. ALL DISTURBEDAREASB BEFORE
BE
5�'� �� �02°snSPG FEWCTCLOSEOUT.IENTLY P BEFORE
PROJECT CLOSEOUT. PERMANENT
'C W;6g1, `X A66 SEEDING CCORDSHALL WIT SEEDED C
�g 06 50f* AccoaoANCE WITH NORTH cARouNA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
o �
o `J
u S a
0 PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
00
� w SECTION 6.11.
—_ao'1—uum.—ao'1—.-- _L�—_
— — — 133+0 134+00 M1—/1i5y/-----aoi—>3E+aa aoi----�Mm----aoi--1�"JRaoi-----coils/5re/u---aoi---�'-� 5. REFERTOPNGG02G0001168-
1g1+o0 IRHNISEY RD—LOD--/( WATTLE WATTLE —Loo-- --Loo-----Loo---- goo--- Loo—WATTLE) DISTURBANCE 0 6 CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESPCDETAILS.
z13000 _ J oo____ 1.00----
POST
_ DAMS,
LIMITS OF PROTECTION A ETLAND MATTING. AND
PRIOR TO
//J/// LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL BLIPS
WATTLE) WATTLE) MUST BE MAINTAINED AND RE MAIN IN
PLACE UNTIL END OF CONSTRUCTION
J ACTNITIES AND SITE IS STABILIZED WITH
WATTLEey1�P WATTLE PERMANENT SEEDING.
LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA: 11.30 AC
POINT OF CONTACT (MAINTENANCE):
JOSEPH KEILY [phone]
LEGEND:
- — — L BD— — - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF
DISTU PEAR CE
GUY WIRE TO
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED 8"
BE RELOCATED
I WETLANDS
RAMSEV RD--'----
+
PIPELINE
—____ — _____ ----- — -- — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
—
TEMPORARY SILT FENCC �
•1 WATTLE
ioi
c
lag+oo
_I
144
o
145+00 14s.00—
14T+00 001so.o0 1s1.o0
1sz.00----
1sa.00
154.00
--
�/
z
_
— -----
---14g
_____ -----
— --- ----1ss.00
J
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE��,
CLOTH & GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
WATTLE RAMSEV RD
WATTLE - — - - - - - -
WATTLE -
-' -
- —
---- -
ROCK CHECK DAM
w
ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION -ova
WATTLE
-- -- — — —
11�ETLAND MATTING,
CHECK
6'ROCK
DAM
6ROCK
PERMANENT SEEDING_ a
OUTLET
-
--
CHECK DAM
OUTLET
TEMPORARY SEEDING
�,
ISSUED FORBID
11®
0]-102020
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' DO NOT SCALE THIS DRA'RING' USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
REF. DWG(S)
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY
DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095)" DRAAING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED DATE "TO INSURE THERE IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER
COPIES OF THIS DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE S ITH RECORDS & INFO.
MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
xo DnrE gEulsioxlsl DEscxmriox er cxx naaD DEscx1 SHEETS) 25 OF 29 DwG SCALE AS NOTED
A_057CO2O ISSUED FOR 90%DESIGN REVIEW VP MMTCAM AREA CODE x1853 "" """'+ NCDOT 17 RELOCATION
B 08-21-2020 ISSUED FOR BID VP MET CAM ACCOUNT NUMBER DWGDHTE 1211&20195UPERSEDED —
PROJECTNUMBER 0229512 ^" """'+ Tec� C�DU RGY Piedmont ES&PC PLAN De wixh xoMDEa visa
DRAWING BV JJK %XI%X120%% '! r6INaturd)%a8 JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA PNG-C-026-0001123 gEBx
STATION ID I PIT AT
S90VPL9JG/PRGi$TAiAP CHECKER INITIALS IIILIT Xx1HXI20%H %%% NEGI BERN RESOUCE CENTER. NEGI BERN, NORTH CAROLINH

Icy
1401w
�FRCf£S90VPL9JG/PRGi STA�APSiA�AP
PROPOSED 8" ADDIT IONALTEMPORARV
RAMSEV RD PIPELINE LIMITS OF WORKSPACE
63
1I
DISTURBANCE I
15]•
w
_ -----
0 -- 158.00
159+00---160+00
6
i
J
401
-..
6'ROCK
CHECKDAM
OUTLET
RAMSEY RD
6'ROCK
6'ROCK
CHECK
- OUTLET AM
\I
CHECK DAM
--
OUTLET
I I
I I
I I
I to
I
MPTCH LINE 163+00
LIMITS OF WATTLE
DISTURBANCE
WATTLE WATTLE p \
KELLUM LOOP RD /
F, 7-----CC-IOE. CCU -----U----aox--YOB*o6aox- ---.
- too----- too- _
C----- LCC----- LCC----- Lm----- goo---- PROPOSED 8"
RAMSEY RD PIPELINE
RAMSEV RD
KELLUM
LOOP RD
SITE LOCATION MAP
NOTES
1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
NON PAVED AREAS. IN PAVED AREAS,
COMPOST SOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED.
2. ALL TREESTOREMAIN SHALL BE
PROTECTED WITH TREE PROTECTION
FENCING. TREE PROTECTION FENCING
SHALL BE 4'ORANGE MESH FENCE
PLACED ALONG THE LIMITS OF
DISTUFRANCE(LOD)
3. ANY DISTURBED AREA LEFT IDLE FORA
PERIOD OF 14 DAYS OR LONGER SHALL
BE SD% ILIZED WITH MULCHING AND
TEMPORARY SEEDING WITH THE
EXCEPTION OF AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
WHICH ONLY NEED STABILIZATION TO
THE EXTENT REQUIRED TO AVOID TOP
SOIL WASHING AN!AY.
4. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PERMANENTLY SEEDED BEFORE
PROJECT CLOSEOUT. PERMANENT
SEEDING SHALL BE SEEDED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH NORTH CAROLINA
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL
SECTION 6.11.
5. REFER TOPNGG02G0001168-
PNG-C .001169 FOR ES&PC DETAILS.
6. INSTALL SILT FENCE CHECK DAMS.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES INLET
PROTECTION V, ETIAND MATTING. AND
COMPOST SOCKSI WADDLES PRIOR TO
LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL BLIPS
MUST BE MAINTAINED AND REMAIN IN
PLACE UNTIL END OF CONSTRUCTION
ACTNITIES AND SITE IS STABILIZED WITH
PERMANENT SEEDING.
LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA: 11.30 AC
POINT OF CONTACT (MAINTENANCE):
JOSEPH KEILY [phone]
LEGEND:
- - - L 0 D - - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING CONTOUR
WETLANDS
TTEMPORARY SILT FENC�,.a
1 WATTLE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CLOTH & GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION
ROCK CHECK DAM-4�Dfea ROCK PIPE INLET PROTECTION
WIETLAND MATTING
ISSUED FORBID
0T-102020
REF. DWG(S)
PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' DO NOT SCALE THIS DRAWING' USE DIMENSIONS ONLY
PIEDMONT'S NATURAL GAS FACILITY DRAWINGS ARE CONSIDERED CONFIDENTIAL (OM-1095)" DRA'AIING IS CURRENT ONLY THROUGH THE LATEST REVISED
DATE "TO INSURE THERE
IS NO RISK OF INAPPROPRIATE DISCLOSURE ALL PREVIOUS PAPER COPIES OF THIS
DRAWING MUST BE DESTROYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RECORDS & INFO. MANAGEMENT (RIM) POLICY 1001
DnrE
szozo
REVISIox1S1 DESCRIPTION
IssueDFOR9oiDESIGN REw w
Dr
VP
Cxx
MMTCAMAREA
.PPD
DESCRIPTION
CODE 1853^TF�
NCDOT 17 RELOCATION
-21-2020
ISSUED FOR BID
VP
MMT
CAM
ACCOUNT NUMBER
XXI%%120%%
%%%ED
PROJECT NUMBER
022911z
^"
"""'
Tec�
C�DU
RGY
Piedmont
r6 �
ES&PC PLAN
DRAWNG BY
JJK
!
Natural Gas
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
TATIONID
X%I%XI20%H
%%%
NEWI BERN RESOUCE CENTER. NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKER INITLALS NMI
TEMPORARY SEEDING
SHEETS) 260E 29 D'AGSCALE AS NOTED
NGGDATE 1211&2019 SUPERSEDED
PNG -C- 26-0001124 R B

7U
\ \ \my
E�\
\\\\\\ \\\\}�E
§;,:r:
\\\}\\ \\\\\\ \\}\\\}
-
}}())\)§§[/
\�\ }\\ \\\\\\\ \}\\ \\
goj
§}}E/
\(} \\(:
\ \/\ \\ \h \;9IE2Id
\
<
z
jzo o
/O §-
zz!
} z//
%§\(
e z=:
00>
0 mz<
0 00!
z E/>
\

(<
\:.0.
0:
\}_§(
\ \}
- - <
z
z \ / !
z:
/ /\
\ 0(
- : \ zz!
_ § u ooz
-(
o- \ g
0zz
jj �zC)
$ § j
-- - ® L \
}; }\ ({ ; z
ƒ § S;
§( \\ \
NIN CD \/ - R
)/
\ \ \ /^ A }
\ L�iON
( \ /
NIN
? - _ }}(}:!
? -
y
§ \ \ /
-
\ 72 /E d / -
/ \ / Ĥ-
» § ? $f, \,
-
? § ±: $\
> ? 0 2 /` \}
=- / y
» § / /
/
$LU
? -
\ §t5 � \
� \\\\\
<
§

APPENDIX F - WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT
AND PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION REQUEST

BURNS MCDONNELL
October 9, 2020
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Re: Wetland Delineation Report
Piedmont Natural Gas
Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project — Ramsey Road
Onslow County, North Carolina
Burns & McDonnell Project No: 118917
Dear Ms. Capito:
Burns & McDonnell was retained by Piedmont Natural Gas (client) to provide wetland
delineation services for the Highway 17 Distribution Replacement Project (Project). The
following sections provide information on the proposed Project and summarize the completed
wetland delineation.
INTRODUCTION
The client proposes to construct approximately 16,922 linear feet of 8" medium -dense
polyethylene (MDPE) natural gas pipeline in Onslow County, North Carolina. The Project is
located north of Jacksonville, North Carolina, west of New Bern Highway (Highway 17), and is
accessible via Ramsey Road (Route 1324). A General Location Map illustrating the Project
location has been included in Attachment A (Figure A-1). Potential construction activities
associated with the Project may include clearing, grubbing, and construction of pipeline
infrastructure.
The proposed Project has the potential to impact wetlands or other waterbodies that may be
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) as designated by Section
404 of the Clean Water Act. In an effort to avoid and minimize potential impacts to regulated
waterbodies, Burns & McDonnell conducted a wetland delineation within an approximately 100-
foot-wide corridor along an approximate 3.19-mile-long section of Ramsey Road (Route 1324)
and Kellum Loop Road (Study Area) to determine the boundaries and extent of wetlands and
other water bodies including streams, ditches, ponds, etc. The Study Area was approximately
30.17 acres in size, which is larger than the proposed 11.30 acres Project area.
METHODS
The following discussions summarize the methods used to review existing data and conduct the
wetland delineation.
Existing Data Review
Burns & McDonnell reviewed publicly available background information for the Study Area
prior to conducting a site visit. This background information included the U.S. Geological
burnsmrd. ram

BURNS 'WDONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
October 7, 2020
Page 2
Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic maps, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) National
Wetland Inventory (NWI) map, and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (MRCS) 2014 Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) digital data for Onslow
County. Maps generated from this publicly available data are included as Figures A-2 and A-3 in
Attachment A.
Wetland presence based only on background information, including NWI maps, cannot be
assumed to be an accurate assessment of potentially occurring jurisdictional wetlands. Wetland
identification criteria differ between the USACE and other agencies. As an example, wetlands
shown on an NWI map may not be under the jurisdiction of the USACE, and USACE-
jurisdictional wetlands are not always included on the NWI maps. A field visit is necessary to
identify any wetlands, streams, or other waterbodies that may be present.
Wetland Delineation Field Survey
An onsite wetland delineation of the Study Area was completed in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the 2010 Regional Supplement to the
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain (Regional
Supplement). Sample plots were established at multiple locations and Wetland Determination
Data Forms from the Regional Supplement were completed to characterize the Study Area
(Attachment B). Vegetation, soil conditions, and hydrologic indicators were recorded at each of
these sample plots. Locations of sample plots and other identified features were surveyed in the
field by Burns & McDonnell using a submeter Global Positioning System (GPS) antenna.
Natural color photographs were taken onsite and are included in Attachment C.
RESULTS
The following sections describe the results of the existing data review and the completed wetland
delineation.
Existing Data Review
The existing USGS topographic maps for Jacksonville North, NC (2019 Revision) and Kellum,
NC (2019 Revision) were reviewed to familiarize Burns & McDonnell wetland personnel with
the topography of the Study Area and potential locations of wetlands and other waterbodies
(Figure A-2). The USGS topographic maps indicate the Study Area consists of mostly developed
residential and commercial areas with several agricultural and forested areas along the northern
side of Ramsey Road (Route 1324) with mainly flat terrain, and multiple drainage features and
unnamed tributaries draining into Wolf Swamp (Figure A-2).
The USFWS NWI map indicates a linear freshwater forested/shrub wetland located within the
Study Area (Figure A-2).

BURNS 'WDONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
October 9, 2020
Page 3
The NRCS SSURGO digital data indicates the Study Area is underlain primarily by Rains fine
sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods; Goldsboro fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes; and Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Atlantic Coast Flatwoods.
Rains fine sandy loam and Lynchburg fine sandy loam are considered hydric in Onslow County,
North Carolina (Figure A-3).
Wetland Delineation Field Survey
Between September 23 and 27, 2019 and October 10 and 11, 2019, Patrick Meier, wetland
specialist with Burns & McDonnell, conducted a wetland delineation of the Study Area to
identify the presence of wetlands, streams, and other waterbodies. The Study Area was largely
composed of developed residential and commercial areas, agricultural fields, and forested areas
with flat terrain, and multiple drainage features.
Vegetation: Typical woody species within the Study Area consisted of sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), loblolly pine (Pious taeda), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweet -bay (Magnolia
virginiana), and southern bayberry (Morella cerifera). Typical herbaceous species within the
Study Area consisted of giant plume grass (Saccharum giganteum), bushy bluestem
(Andropogon glomeratus), broom -sedge (Andropogon virginicus), tall goldenrod (Solidago
altissima), saw -tooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica).
Soils: Typical soil colors ranged from dark black (10YR 2/1) to light gray (2.5Y 5/2) with a
typical texture of sandy loam.
Hydrology: The primary sources of hydrology within the Study Area were ground water table
and surface runoff. Typical indictors of hydrology included geomorphic position and FAC-
neutral test.
Delineated Areas: Wetlands
During the delineation a total of 4.438 acres of potentially jurisdictional wetlands were located
within the Study Area. Typical site conditions for each wetland classification are described
below and locations of the wetland areas are shown in Figure A-4. Table 1 provides the quantity
for each wetland classification delineated within the Study Area.

BURNS 4 MgDON NELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
October 9, 2020
Page 4
Table 1: Classification and Size of Wetlands Delineated within the Study Area
Wetland Classification
Size (acres)
Palustrine Forested
0.963
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub
3.083
Palustrine Emergent
0.392
Total:
4.438
Palustrine Forested (PSS) 0.963-acre: PFO wetlands typically occurred along the northern
edges of the existing utility maintenance easement where tree clearing and brush removal had not
occurred. Vegetation typically present within these areas consisted of loblolly pine, sweet -bay,
wax myrtle, and red maple. Wetland hydrology was typically indicated by soil saturation.
Observed soils typically ranged from black (10YR 2/1) to light gray (2.5Y 511). Hydric soil was
typically indicated by a thick dark surface.
Palustrine Scrub -Shrub (PSS) 3.083 acres: The majority of wetland areas identified within the
Study Area were classified as PSS. These wetlands typically occurred as wetland flats within a
maintained utility easement. Vegetation typically present within these areas consisted of loblolly
pine, sweet -bay, giant plume grass, and cottongrass bulrush (Scirpus cyperinus). Wetland
hydrology was typically indicated by soil saturation, geomorphic position, and FAC-neutral test.
Observed soils typically ranged from very dark gray (10YR 2/1) to light gray (2.5Y 5/1) in color
with a sandy loam texture. Hydric soil was typically indicated by a thick dark surface and a
depleted matrix with redox concentrations.
Palustrine Emergent Wetlands (PEA/1) 0.392-acre: PEM wetlands typically occurred as
roadside wetland drainages and stream channel buffers. Typical vegetation within this area
consisted of wand panic grass (Panicum virgatum), handsome -harry (Rhexia virginica), giant
plume grass, broom -sedge, slender goldentop (Euthamia carohniana), and Japanese stilt grass
(Microstegium vimineum). Wetland hydrology was indicated by surface cracks, geomorphic
position, and FAC neutral test. Observed soils ranged from very dark brown (IOYR 2/1) to light
gray (IOYR 511) with a sandy loam texture. Hydric soil was typically indicated by a depleted
matrix.

BURNS 'WDONNELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
October 9, 2020
Page 5
Delineated Areas: Streams
One stream channel was observed within the Study Area during the wetland delineation. Table 2
provides the classification and length of the stream. The stream is also described below and
displayed on Figure A-4.
Table 2: Type and Size of Wetlands Delineated within the Study Area
Stream Number
Stream Type a
Length (linear feet)
S-1
Perennial
71.94
Stream-1 (S-1): S-1, the Wolf Swamp mainstem, is located near the eastern end of the Study
Area off Ramsey Road. The stream is fed by surface runoff from adjacent upland area(s) and
flows to the south where it enters a culvert pipe and leaves the Study Area (Figure A-4). The
channel averaged approximately 10 feet wide and the banks averaged approximately 3 feet deep.
Substrate within the channel consisted of a sandy loam. Riparian vegetation along the banks
consisted of water oak (Quercus nigra), swamp smart weed (Persicaria hydropiperoides), and
Japanese stilt grass.
Delineated Areas: Jurisdictional Ditches
Approximately 5,640.72 linear feet (L.F.) of potentially jurisdictional ditches were located
within the Study Area. These features were delineated based on information from the document
"Ditches in North Carolina" (February 2017), provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District.
These features typically occurred as vegetated roadside and agricultural ditches that were fed by
upslope wetland sources or displayed wetland characteristics such as ordinary high water mark
(OHWM), presence of groundwater, inundation, or saturation. Dominant vegetation within these
features typically occurred as FAC or wetter species.
SUMMARY
Burns & McDonnell conducted a wetland delineation of the Study Area on September 23 and 27,
2019 and October 10 and 11, 2019 to determine the presence of wetlands, stream channels, and
other waterbodies. 0.963-acre of PFO, 3.083 acres of PSS wetlands, and 0.392-acre of PEM
wetlands, 71.94 L.F. of stream channel, and 5,640.72 L.F. of jurisdictional ditches were
identified. On behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas, Burns & McDonnell respectfully requests a
preliminary jurisdictional determination of the water resources identified in the Study Area. We
would appreciate the opportunity to meet onsite to present our fieldwork. Please contact me at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail] to set up a confirmation visit or to
discuss any questions regarding this delineation.

BURNS 4 MgDON NELL
Ms. Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
October 9, 2020
Page 6
Sincerely,
Patrick K. Meier
Wetland Specialist
Attachments:
Attachment A: Figures
Attachment B: Regional Wetland Determination Data Forms: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal
Plain Region
Attachment C: Site Photographs

ATTACHMENT A - FIGURES

- yj,y,.ctxn Bw..�Varq �$yd'
us
NC
Nnrse Swamp
SPrxayi - _
B Jacksonville
NC 24 - - lHr'�Se awrtNarn NC T4 �-
N.91
North Figure A-1
Carolina Noar" IN General Location Map
StudyAreaM PONNEL. Ramsey Road
sotJth 1 0.5 0 1 Duke Energy
Carolina Onslow County, North Carolina
Miles

44/
�x
"-,�: Z.
!1
1 �r
1
O Study Area NWI Wetland Type PFO Figure NWI, NHD, FEMA, and
PEM Hoar" Topographic Ma
2 NHD Stream PUB `�BURNS p
PSS UEDONNELL Ramsey Road
FEMA Floodway Riverine 600 300 0 600 Duke Energy
u" FEMA 100-Year Floodplain Onslow County, North Carolina
Scale in Feet Page 1 of 2

r r
le
V t�
jjjw
IN 1324
Gem
1314
``off
'Z
CD
Cem
O Study Area NWI Wetland Type PFO Figure NWI, NHD, FEMEMA, and
PEM voarH Topographic Ma
NHD Stream PUB `�BURNS p
7 PSS BURNS
Ramsey Road
FEMA Floodway Riverine 600 300 0 600 Duke Energy
us r ® FEMA 100-Year Floodplain Onslow County, North Carolina
,� - - Scale in Feet Page 2 of 2

r� r I Vr
,t< �
vY4,,
o - 5-01
- w-09AL
r,
Alb
AL
" - �-RamseYRa State Rtl 1324 �--- � — ,• e� e -
,,oll
1
CC
�i
E—Study Area Delineated Stream Type (S) Delineated Wetland Type (W) Figure A-4
O SamplePlot Jurisdictional Ditch PEM NoarH Wetlands and Other Water Bodies
1 z s� a ®BURNS Ramsey Road
e Perennial PSS `MSPONNEI h En
ergy
s PFO 200 100 0 200 Du
Onslow County, North Carolina
"'" PUB Scale in Feet Page 4 of 6

amp
=StudyArea Delineated Stream Type (S) Delineated Wetland Type (W)
O SamplePlot Jurisdictional Ditch PEM
Z 3 4
Perennial PSS
PFO
PUB
NORTH
200 100 0 200
iiiiiMMEMMEMEM
Scale in Feet
Figure A-4
Wetlands and Other Water Bodies
® BURNS Ramsey Road
`MSPONNEIL: Duke Energy
Onslow County, North Carolina
Page 6 of 6

ATTACHMENT B - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS,
ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTAL PLAIN REGION

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-01
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.812648° Long:-77.406192'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Wetland W-01.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ® ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ® ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
® Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
® Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
►1 ■
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators B4, B10, and D2 are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-01
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover:
15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 20% x 1 = 20
1.
Pinus taeda
10 %
Y
FAC
FACW species 28 % x 2 = 56
2.
Magnolia virginiana
3 %
Y
FACW
FAC species 50 % x 3 = 150
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 15 % x 4 = 60
5.
%
UPL species 0 % x 5 = 0
6.
Column Totals: 113 % (A) 286 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
13 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1.
Dichanthelium dichotomum
30 %
Y
FAC
2.
Scirpus cyperinus
20%
Y
OBL
® Dominance Test is >50%
3.
Saccharum giganteum
10 %
N
FACW
® Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
4.
Dichanthelium clandestinum
10 %
N
FACW
❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
Lonicera japonica
10 %
N
FACU
6.
Rubus argutus
10 %
N
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7.
Rhexia virginica
5 %
N
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
Eupatorium capillifolium
5 %
N
FACU
9.
%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
100 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total
cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Dominance test and prevalence index are met
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
SP-01
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist) % Color (moist)
0-10
10YR 3/1 95 10YR 5/1
10-20
10YR 3/1 70
10-20 10YR 411 30
Redox Features
% Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
5 D M Sandy Loam
Sandy Loam Co -Matrix
Sandy Loam Co Matrix
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
® Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
(MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present?
Type: Depth (inches): ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F7 met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-02
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.811696° Long:-77.402386'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Upland near flag B-6 between W-02 and W-03.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
■ ►1
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicator D2 is present.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-02
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover: 15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 0 % x 1 = 0
1.
%
FACW species 30 % x 2 = 60
2.
FAC species 5 % x 3 = 15
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 10 % x 4 = 40
5.
%
UPL species 60 % x 5 = 300
6.
Column Totals: 105 % (A) 415 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.95
0 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Zoysia matrella
60 %
Y UPL
2. Andropogon glomeratus
30 %
Y FACW
❑ Dominance Test is >50%
3. Solidagoaltissima
10 %
N FACU
❑ Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4. Verbena hastata
5 %
N FAC
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
%
6.
% °
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7
%
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
%
9.
%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
105 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ® No
Remarks: No indicators of hydrophytic vegetation are present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
SP-02
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-20 10YR 4/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present?
Type: Depth (inches): ❑ Yes ® No
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators are present. Soil mixed with concrete/gravel.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-03
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.811079° Long:-77.399449'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Wetland W-03.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ® ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ® ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
® FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
►1 ■
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators D2 and D5 are present.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-03
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover:
15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 5 % x 1 = 5
1.
Pinus taeda
10 %
Y
FAC
FACW species 70 % x 2 = 140
2.
FAC species 30 % x 3 = 90
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 5 % x 4 = 20
5.
%
UPL species 0 % x 5 = 0
6.
Column Totals: 110 % (A) 255 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.32
10 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1.
Rhynchospora fascicularis
40 %
Y
FACW
2.
Saccharum _&anteum
10 %
Y
FACW
® Dominance Test is >50%
3.
Dichantheliumdichotomum
10 %
Y
FAC
® Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4.
Andropogon glomeratus
10 %
Y
FACW
❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
Arundinaria _&antea
10 %
Y
FACW
6.
Smilax bona-nox
5 %
N
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7.
Andropagon virginicus
5 %
N
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
Lonicera japonica
5 %
N
FACU
9.
Scirpus cyperinus
5 %
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
100 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total
cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Dominance test and prevalence index are met
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: SP-03
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/1 100 Sandy Clay
6-20 10YR 4/1 60 10YR 5/1 40 D M Sandy Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
® Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
(MLRA 14A1C1)
9, 53, 53D
Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present?
Type: Depth (inches): ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F3 is met.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-04
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.810132° Long:-77.394694'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Upland above flag H-3.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
■ ►1
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicator D2 is present.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-04
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover:
15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 0 % x 1 = 0
1.
%
FACW species 30 % x 2 = 60
2.
FAC species 40 % x 3 = 120
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 15 % x 4 = 60
5.
%
UPL species 10 % x 5 = 50
6.
Column Totals: 95 % (A) 290 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.05
0 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Saccharum _&anteum
20%
Y
FACW
2. Andropogon virginicus
20%
Y
FAC
® Dominance Test is >50%
3. Dichantheliumdichotomum
20%
Y
FAC
❑ Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4. Eupatorium capillifolium
10 %
N
FACU
❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Panicum verrucosum
10 %
N
FACW
6. Chrysopsis mariana
10 %
N
UPL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7. Solidago altissima
5 %
N
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
%
9.
%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
95 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total
cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Dominance test is met
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: SP-04
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-10 10YR 5/2 100
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present?
Type: Compaction Depth (inches): 10 ❑ Yes ® No
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators are met. Refusal at 10 inches due to heavy compaction.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-05
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.810123° Long:-77.394557'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Wetland near flag H-3.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ® ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ® ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
® Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
►1 ■
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicators B6 and D2 are present.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-05
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover: 15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 0 % x 1 = 0
1.
%
FACW species 10 % x 2 = 20
2.
FAC species 55 % x 3 = 165
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 20% x 4 = 80
5.
%
UPL species 0 % x 5 = 0
6.
Column Totals: 85 % (A) 265 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.12
0 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Panicum virgatum
30 %
Y FAC
2. Euthamia caroliniana
20%
Y FAC
® Dominance Test is >50%
3. Saccharumgiganteum
10 %
N FACW
❑ Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4. Solidago altissima
10 %
N FACU
❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Eupatorium capillifolium
10 %
N FACU
6. AndropOgon virginicus
5 %
N FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7
%
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
%
9.
%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
85 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Dominance test is met
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
SP-05
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist)
0-12 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 6/8
Redox Features
% Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
10 C M Silty Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
® Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed): Hydric Soil Present?
Type: Compaction Depth (inches): 12 ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Hydric soil indicator F6 is met. Refusal at 12 inches due to heavy compaction.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Highway 17 City/County: Jacksonville Sampling Date: 10/10/2019
Applicant/Owner: Piedmont Natural Gas State: NC Sampling Point: SP-06
Investigator(s): P.Meier Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.810751° Long:-77.380252'
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI Classification: N/A
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Vegetation Soil Hydrology
Significantly Disturbed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Naturally Problematic? ❑ ❑ ❑
® Yes ❑ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? ® Yes ❑ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes No Remarks: Upland near intersection of Ramsey Road and Drummer Kellum Road.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® ❑
Hydric Soil Present? ® ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? ❑
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
® Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth
Yes
No (inches)
El
0
El
0
El
0
■ ►1
Remarks: Wetland hydrology indicator D2 is present.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
inspections, etc.), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: SP-06
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
%
Number of Dominant Species
2
%
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
%
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4 %
5.
%
Percent of Dominant Species
that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (A/B)
6
%
7.
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0 %
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover:
15.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
OBL species 30 % x 1 = 30
1. Pinus taeda
10 %
Y
FAC
FACW species 10 % x 2 = 20
2.
FAC species 30 % x 3 = 90
3
%
4.
%
FACU species 15 % x 4 = 60
5.
%
UPL species 0 % x 5 = 0
6.
Column Totals: 85 % (A) 200 (B)
7
%
8.
%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.35
10 %
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 45.0 20% of total cover: 18.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
El Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Juncus effusus
30 %
Y
OBL
2. Saccharum _&anteum
10 %
Y
FACW
® Dominance Test is >50%
3. Andropogon virginicus
10 %
Y
FAC
® Prevalence Index is:53.0'
4. Sorghum halepense
10 %
Y
FACU
❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5. Carex sp.
10 %
Y
FAC
6. Digitaria sanquinalis
5 %
N
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
7
%
present, unless disturbed or problematic
8.
%
9.
%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6
11.
%
cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
12.
%
regardless of height.
75 %
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants excluding vines,
50% of total cover: 1_5
20% of total cover: 0_6
less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
tall.
1.
%
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants,
2
%
regardless of size, and woody plants less than
3.28 ft tall.
3.
%
4.
%
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft
5
%
in height.
0 %
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total
cover: 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No
Remarks: Dominance test and prevalence index are met
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
SP-06
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist) % Color (moist)
0-6
10YR 2/1 90 10YR 6/8
6-20
10YR 4/1 90 10YR 6/8
Redox Features
% Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
10 C M Clay
10 C M Clav
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR, P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR, P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
® Depleted Matrix (F3)
® Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soil (F20)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Type: Depth (inches):
Remarks: Hydric soil indicators F3 and F6 are met.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F10)
(outside MLRA 150A, B)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(LRR P, S, T)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present?
® Yes ❑ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

ATTACHMENT C - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photograph C-1: View of Wetland Sample Point 01; W-1; Flat (northwest).
Photograph C-2: View of Wetland Sample Point 01; W-1; Flat (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I ,�'►BURNS
Highway 17 \KMSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-3: View of Upland Sample Point 02; (northwest).
Photograph C-4: View of Upland Sample Point 02; (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I j ►BURN S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

'p.
p
r

Photograph C-7: View of Upland Sample Point 04 (northwest).
Photograph C-8: View of Upland Sample Point 04 (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I 4BURNS
Highway 17 *4'LXMSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-9: View of Wetland Sample Point 05; W-6; Flat (northwest).
Photograph C-10: View of Wetland Sample Point 05; W-6; Flat (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I �%. BURNS
Highway 17 " MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-11: View of Upland Sample Point 06 (west).
Photograph C- 12: View of Upland Sample Point 06 (east).
Piedmont Natural Gas I j ►BURN S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-13: Downstream view of S-1; Perennial (north).
Piedmont Natural Gas I j ►BURN S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-14: View of potentially jurisdictional ditch JD- 06 along Ramsey Road (west).
Photograph C-15: View of potentially jurisdictional ditch JD- 06 along Ramsey Road (east).
Piedmont Natural Gas I **BURNS
Highway 17 \&MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-16: View of potentially jurisdictional ditch JD- 11 along Ramsey Road
(northwest).
Photograph C-17: View of potentially jurisdictional ditch JD- 11 along Ramsey Road
(southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I �,SBURNS
Highway 17 \KMSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington district
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re alatoiyPermitPro�4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.g5px,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple parcels north of Jacksonville, NC
City, State: Jacksonville, NC
County: Onslow
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Patrick Meier
Mailing Address: 7201 Glen Forest Drive, Suite 100
Richmond, Virginia 23226
Telephone Number: 804-200-6326
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See attached PIN list in Appendix A
Mailing Address: Jacksonville, Onslow County, NC
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/ParceVrax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 30.17 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
34.810293
Longitude:-77.390152
17 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hW2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro Qxam/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4M.mit/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hW2://www.saw.usace.4M.mit/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District'swebsite
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

APPENDIX G - USFWS AND SHPO REQUEST FOR
CONSULTATION LETTERS

BURNS ;&ME-DONNELL
October 1, 2020
Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Submitted via Email at pete benjamin(&,,fws.gov
Re: Request for Concurrence — USFWS Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1617
Piedmont Natural Gas, Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project Ramsey
Road
Dear Mr. Benjamin:
Burns & McDonnell was retained by Piedmont Natural Gas Company (PNG) to provide
environmental permitting support for the Ramsey Road segment of the proposed Highway 17
NCDOT Distribution Relocation Project (Project) located in Onslow County, North Carolina
(NC). The Project, which will result in impacts on waters of the U.S., will require a Nationwide
Permit No. 12 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District. The
following information is being provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
review and concurrence under the requirements of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). A Project Location map is provided in Attachment A.
INTRODUCTION
PNG plans to install approximately 16,922 linear feet of 8" medium -dense polyethylene (MDPE)
natural gas distribution pipeline in Onslow County, NC. The Project is located within an
approximate 3.19-mile-long section along Ramsey Road (Route 1324) and Kellum Loop Road.
The project starts approximately 0.17 miles east of the intersection of Route 1324 and Carolina
Forest Boulevard, proceeds east along Route 1324 for approximately 3.12 miles, turns southeast
and proceeds for 0.17 miles along Kellum Loop Road, and ends at New Bern Highway
(Highway 17).The pipeline will cross various land use types consisting primarily of mixed
hardwood pine forest, agricultural fields, residential and commercial areas, and existing
maintained utility and NCDOT right-of-way. The habitat assessment was conducted along the
proposed pipeline route using a 100-foot-wide survey corridor along Route 1324 and Kellum
Loop Road (Study Area). The Study Area is approximately 30.17 acres total, which is larger than
the 11.30 acres that will be temporarily impacted during construction.
HABITAT ASSESSMENT
In September 2019, Burns & McDonnell biologists completed a pedestrian survey of the Project
Study Area to evaluate the potential for federally protected species habitat to occur within the
Project area.
7201 Glen Forest Drive \ Suite 100 \ Richmond, VA 23226
burnsmcd.com

BURNS;&MGDONNELL
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
October 1, 2020
Page 2
In addition to the pedestrian field survey, an Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
report was pulled for the Project. The IPaC listed the West Indian manatee (Trichechus
manatus), three bird species (piping plover [Charadrius melodus], red knot [Calidris canutus
rufa], and red -cockaded woodpecker [Picoides borealis]), five reptile species (green sea turtle
[Chelonia mydas], Kemp's ridley sea turtle [Lepidochelys kempii], leatherback sea turtle
[Dermochelys coriacea], and loggerhead sea turtle [Caretta caretta]), and five flowering plants
(Cooley's meadowrue [Thalictrum cooleyi], golden sedge [Carex lutea], pondberry [Lindera
melissifolia], rough -leaved loosestrife [Lysimachia asperulaefolia], and seabeach amaranth
[Amaranthus pumilus]) as potentially occurring in the Project Study Area. Additionally, one bird
species (eastern black rail [Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. Jamaicensis]) was listed as proposed
threatened and one reptile species (American alligator [Alligator miss iss ippiensis]) was listed as
threatened due to similarity of appearance (Table 1). There were no proposed critical habitats
documented on the IPaC. Additionally, a desktop review was performed using aerial imagery,
USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) data, U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) 2017 Web Soil Survey for Onslow County, NC, and
United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) data.
Table 1: Protected Species with Potential to Occur in the Project Area
Species Name
Federal Status
Preferred Habitat
Impact
Mammals
Suitable habitat consists of
West Indian Manatee
brackish and freshwater systems,
Habitat not present in Survey
(Trichechus manatus)
Threatened
and shorelines with submerged
Area - Not Likely to Adversely
aquatic vegetation (seagrass and
Affect
eelgrass).
Birds
Eastern Black Rail
ProposedThreatened
Suitable habitat consists of
Habitat not present in Survey
(Laterallusjamaicensisssp.
impounded salt and brackish
Area — Not likely to Adversely
Jamaicensis)
marshes
Affect
Suitable habitat consists of areas
Habitat not present in Survey
Piping Plover
along ocean shores such as
(Charadrius melodus)
Threatened
coastal beaches, sandflats, and
Area —Not likely to Adversely
mudflats.
Affect
Suitable habitat consists of sandy
beaches, salt and freshwater
Habitat not present in Survey
Red knot
Threatened
marshes, lagoons mudflats of
Area —Not likely to Adversely
(Calidris canutus rufa)
estuaries and bays, mangrove
Affect
swamps, and shorelines of large
lakes.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Endangered
Suitable habitat consists of open,
Habitat not present in Survey

BURNS;&ME-DONNELL&
k
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
October 1, 2020
Page 3
(Picoides borealis)
mature pine woodlands. Rarely
Area - Not Likely to Adversely
are groups found in mixed
Affect
hardwood pine forests.
Reptiles
Suitable habitat consists of
American Alligator
Similarity of
swamps, streams, rivers, ponds,
Habitat not present in Survey
Appearance
and lakes. Females and juveniles
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Alligator mississippiensis)
(Threatened)
can be found in Carolina bays
Affect
and other seasonal wetlands.
Suitable habitat consists of
Green Sea Turtle
shallow waters, bays, and inlets.
Habitat not present in Survey
Threatened
Also attracted to lagoons, shoals
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Chelonia mydas)
with an abundance of marine
Affect
grass and algae.
Suitable habitat consists of
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle
nearshore and inshore habitats
Habitat not present in Survey
Endangered
that contain muddy or sandy
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Lepidochelys kempii)
bottoms where prey can be
Affect
found.
Suitable habitat consists of
pelagic waters (open ocean) and
Habitat not present in Survey
Leatherback Sea Turtle
Endangered
sandy nesting beaches backed
Area —Not likely to Adversely
(Dermochelys coriacea)
with vegetation and proximity to
Affect
deep water and generally rough
seas.
Suitable habitat consists of
Loggerhead Sea Turtle
inshore areas such as bays,
lagoons, salt marshes, creeks,
Habitat not present in Survey
(Caretta caretta)
Threatened
ship channels, and mouths of
p
Area —Not likely to Adversely
large rivers. Rocky areas often
Affect
used for feeding.
Flowering Plants
Suitable habitat consists of grass -
sedge bogs and wet pine
Cooley's Meadowrue
savannahs and savannah like
Habitat may be present in Survey
Endangered
areas. Also may grow in fire plow
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Thalictrum cooleyi)
lines, roadside ditches, woodland
Affect
clearings, and powerline rights -
of -way.
Suitable habitat consists of sandy
Golden sedge
soils overlying coquina limestone
Habitat not present in Survey
Endangered
deposits pH ranging between 5.5
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Carex lutea)
and 7.2 and are very wet to
Affect
periodically shallowly inundated.

BURNS ;&MGDONNELL
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
October 1, 2020
Page 4
Suitable habitat consists of
Pondberry
bottomland and hardwood
wetlands in interior areas, and
Habitat not present in Survey
(Lindera melissifolia)
Endangered
margins of sinks, ponds, and
Area —Not likely to Adversely
other depressions in more
Affect
coastal areas.
Suitable habitat consists of edges
Rough -Leaved Loosestrife
between longleaf pine uplands
and pond pine pocosins. Also
Habitat not present in Survey
(Lysimachiaasperulaefolia)
Endangered
found on deep peat in low shrub
Area — Not likely to Adversely
community of large Carolina
Affect
bays.
Suitable habitat consists of
Seabeach Amaranth
barrier beaches with overwash
Habitat not present in Survey
Threatened
flats, lower developing dunes,
Area — Not likely to Adversely
(Amaranthus pumilus)
and upper strands of non-
Affect
eroding beaches.
Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — http:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/, Accessed August 04, 2020;
ANALYSIS BY SPECIES
This habitat assessment includes species under the jurisdiction of the USFWS and protected by
the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The USFWS IPaC was used to identify federally protected
species with potential to occur in the Project area (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/). The West Indian
manatee, piping plover, red knot, red -cockaded woodpecker, green sea turtle, kemp's ridley sea
turtle, leatherback sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge,
pondberry, rough -leaved loosestrife, and seabeach amaranth were listed as federally endangered
and identified by IPaC as species protected by the ESA. No designated critical habitat for these
federally protected species is located within the Project area.
Additionally, the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), which is federally protected by the Bald
and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) (16 U.S.C. 668), was evaluated. If impacts to
migratory bird species are anticipated, it is recommended that construction be restricted during
NC's migratory bird nesting season (April 15 — September 15). No nests were observed during
the September 2019 environmental field surveys.
Mammals
The federally threatened West Indian manatee commonly prefers fresh, brackish, or marine
habitats, including shallow coastal bays, lagoons, estuaries, and inland rivers of varying salinity
extremes. The Study Area is located within previously developed urban and suburban areas and
existing NCDOT right-of-way (ROW). There is one freshwater stream crossings along Route
1324, however this location did not display suitable habitat conditions. Additionally, impacts at
this location will be avoided by use of horizontal directional drill (HDD). Based on a lack of

BURNS;&MGDONNELL
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
October 1, 2020
Page 5
suitable habitat along the Study Area, the Project is not anticipated to result in adverse effects on
the West Indian manatee or suitable West Indian manatee habitat.
Birds
The federally threatened piping plover and red knot typically prefer areas along ocean shores
such as coastal beaches, sandflats, and mudflats. Furthermore, the red knot also is known to in-
habit salt and freshwater marshes, lagoons, mangrove swamps, and shorelines of large lakes.
These habitats were not observed within the Study Area during the field survey. Therefore, the
Project is not anticipated to result in adverse effects to the piping plover and red knot, or suitable
habitat for either species.
The federally endangered red -cockaded woodpecker prefers open pine forest habitat containing
longleaf or southern pines. The red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW) excavates cavities exclusively
in living mature pine trees. Suitable habitat requires pine trees with decayed heartwood and little
to no mid -story growth. As stated previously, the Study Area was located within existing
developed areas and maintained NCDOT ROW, therefore no suitable habitat was observed
within the Study Area. Based on this observation, the Project is not anticipated to result in
adverse effects on the RCW or suitable RCW habitat.
Bald Eagle
The BGEPA prohibits take of bald eagles. Bald eagles are year-round residents in Onslow
County, NC. The Survey Corridor does not intersect any major reservoirs or rivers that could be
used by nesting eagles. If active bald eagle nests are observed, PNG will work with the USFWS
to prevent disturbance and stay within federal and state regulatory compliance. Based on a lack
of suitable habitat along the Study Area, the Project is not anticipated to have adverse effects on
bald eagles.
Reptiles
Suitable habitat for the federally threatened green sea turtle and loggerhead sea turtle consists of
shallow waters, bays, and inlets as well as lagoons and shoals. Additionally, the loggerhead sea
turtle prefers salt marshes, creeks, and mouths of large rivers. Most of these habitat types were
not observed within the Study Area. The Project will cross the mainstem of Wolf Swamp,
however this area did not appear to be suitable habitat. Furthermore, the crossing will be
conducted via horizontal directional drilling (HDD) and will not result in any impacts. Therefore,
the Project is not anticipated to result in adverse effects to the green sea turtle or loggerhead sea
turtle.
The federally endangered Kemp's Ridley sea turtle typically prefers inshore habitats containing
muddy or sandy bottoms. The endangered leatherback sea turtle typically prefers pelagic waters
and sandy nesting beaches with proximity to deep waters. These habitat types were not observed
within the Study Area. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to result in adverse effects to the
Kemp's Ridley or leatherback sea turtles.

BURNSlkME-DONNELL
Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
October 1, 2020
Page 6
Flowering Plants
The federally endangered golden sedge typically occurs within the ecotone between the pine
savanna and adjacent wet hardwood or hardwood/conifer forest. Pondberry typically prefers
bottomland and hardwood wetlands and depressional features in more coastal areas. Rough -
leaved loosestrife typically prefers edges between longleaf pine uplands and pond pine pocosins,
as well as deep peat in low shrub communities of large Carolina bays. The federally threatened
seabeach amaranth typically prefers barrier beaches with overwash flats and lower developing
dunes. The habitats listed for each of these species was not observed within the Study Area. The
federally endangered Cooley's meadowrue typically prefers grass -sedge bogs and wet pine
savannahs as well as roadside ditches, woodland clearings, and powerline rights -of -way.
Roadside ditches are present within the Study Area, however they exist within currently
maintained utility easements. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to result in adverse effects
to Cooley's meadowrue, golden sedge, pondberry, rough -leaved loosestrife, or seabeach
amaranth.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the habitat assessment, Burns & McDonnell has concluded that the
proposed Project is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed Project or the contents of this habitat assessment report, please
contact me at 804-200-6326 or by e-mail at [e-mail] at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Patrick Meier
Wetland Specialist
Attachments:
Attachment A - Figures
Attachment B - IPaC Report
Attachment C - Site Photographs
cc:
Joseph Keily Piedmont Natural Gas
Steve Cahoon Piedmont Natural Gas
Anthony McMullin Burns & McDonnell

ATTACHMENT A - FIGURES

- yj,y,.ctxn Bw..�Varq �$yd'
us
NC
Nnrse Swamp
SPrxayi - _
B Jacksonville
NC 24 - - lHr'�Se awrtNarn NC T4 �-
N.91
North Figure A-1
Carolina Noar" IN General Location Map
StudyAreaM PONNEL. Ramsey Road
sotJth 1 0.5 0 1 Duke Energy
Carolina Onslow County, North Carolina
Miles

•, k
.�
OStudy Area
2� NHD Stream
FEMA Floodway
US 17 FEMA 100-Year Floodplain
NWI Wetland Type-PFO
PEM PUB
PSS - Riverine
NORTH
600 300 0 600
Scale in Feet
MORNS
\\M�PONNELL-
Figure A-2
NWI, NHD, FEMA, and
Topographic Map
Ramsey Road
Duke Energy
Onslow County, North Carolina
Page 1 of 2

No'ith east Creek #
!fD o
14F
41
or E
* 4 • �f77jj" - Z o
N
C
'S1 ■ � �y -�C `
i i } Z
S i * Z
M # O
* xzZo
ti 5 i 7g
y �
L
o �
m
I 'SI
� i i o
1;5� fry i
5
Iit iL `r N
1�. r' z-- zz �Iyl C
a a �
49
:5:- 2E ]n
W in
t
4i a
A hw LL
LL
in z LL LL
+ k
r I
■*
VS-A9-pp's�owquww (pue) deyylaanSuadp 8:s]!Paip ia,Ce-I aoiniaS
rvvivls ueu6eneaou oxw vwenn -H Nnnn ii,W.uls�onmmsaiuelenuenedsoaosaiom_da>asinli.Gw—]ieaii-66w—nnnu I-811 c-UIM

ATTACHMENT B - IPAC REPORT

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1617
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
Project Name: Highway 17 - Ramsey Road
August 04, 2020
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1617
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
Project Name: Highway 17 - Ramsey Road
Project Type: OIL OR GAS
Project Description: Installation of a new natural gas distribution line.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/34.80996183072349N77.39264637822723W
48.7
Counties: Onslow, NC
2

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 15 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME STATUS
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and may have additional
consultation requirements.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675
4
Birds
NAME STATUS
Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Threatened
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110

08/04/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-03675 5
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Golden Sedge Carex lutea Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6025
Pondberry Lindera melissi folia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECTAREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

ATTACHMENT C - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Photograph C-1: View of Road -side area along Ramsey Road (northwest).
Photograph C-2: View of road -side area along Ramsey Road (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I BURNS
Highway 17 �MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-3: View of road -side area along Ramsey Road (northwest).
Photograph C-4: View of road -side area along Ramsey Road (southeast) .
Piedmont Natural Gas I � B u R N S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-5: View of road -side area along Ramsey Road (northwest).
Photograph C-6: View of road -side area along Ramsey Road (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I � B u R N S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-7: Downstream view of Wolf Swamp, perennial stream (north).
Photograph C-8: View of road -side ditch along Ramsey Road (west).
Piedmont Natural Gas I � B u R N S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-9: View of road -side ditch along Ramsey Road (east).
Photograph C-10: View of road -side ditch along Ramsey Road (northwest).
Piedmont Natural Gas I � B u R N S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

Photograph C-11: View of road -side ditch along Ramsey Road (southeast).
Piedmont Natural Gas I � B u R N S
Highway 17 `MSDONNELL
Photographs
October 11, 2019
Onslow County, North Carolina

BURNS ;***�MCSDONNELL
September 24, 2020
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street, Room 258
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Request for Consultation under Section 106
Piedmont Natural Gas
Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project Ramsey Road
Onslow County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley
Burns & McDonnell Consultants, Inc. (Burns & McDonnell), on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas
(PNG) has prepared the following request for consultation under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act for the proposed Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution Replacement
Project Ramsey Road (Project) in Onslow County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). The
proposed area of potential effects (APE) is located at 34.810566,-77.380336 and totals 11.3
acres. The Project includes installation of approximately 17, 250 feet of 8-inch medium -dense
polyethylene (MDPE) natural gas distribution pipeline. The pipeline will be constructed within
new 15-foot-wide permanent easement and utilize 20-foot-wide temporary easements during
construction. The pipeline will be constructed via a combination of open cut and bore methods.
The proposed depth of impact is between 3 and 15 feet. The proposed limits of disturbance
(LOD) are shown in the accompanying LOD kmz.
The proposed Project, which will result in impacts on waters of the U.S., will require a
Nationwide Permit 12 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District.
Piedmont Natural Gas has not submitted its permit application with the USACE regarding this
Project, however, due to project time constraints, the application may be submitted prior to
SHPO concurrence. This project review letter compiles known cultural resources in the Project
vicinity.
BACKGROUND REVIEW
Burns & McDonnell reviewed previously recorded cultural resources and surveys within a Study
Area extending 1 mile beyond the Project (Figure 3) Burns & McDonnell received record search
results from the North Carolina Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) for the Project on
September 10, 2020. Burns & McDonnell also reviewed the State Historic Preservation Office's
(SHPO's) HPOWEB GIS service application online for non -archaeological historic -age
resources within the Study Area on September 11, 2020.
No previous surveys are documented within the APE. Four historic -age non -archaeological
resources and four archaeological sites were identified within the 1-mile Study Area (Figure 3;
Tables 1 and 2). One of the previously recorded non -archaeological historic -age resources was
9400 Ward Parkway \ Kansas City, MO 64114
0 816-333-9400 \ F 816-333-3690 \ burnsmcd.com

BURNS �MSDONNELL
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
September 24, 2020
Page 2
mapped within the APE. The Benjamin Lee Parker House (Resource ON0419) is mapped within
the eastern terminus of the APE at the intersection of U.S. Hwy 17 and Kellum Loop Road. A
review of available aerial imagery indicates a building stood at that location until 2003 but was
no longer extant by 2005.
All of the previously recorded historic -age resources were recorded in 1987 and none have been
assessed for NRHP eligibility. No additional information about the resources was available on
HPOWeb.
Table 1: Historic -Age Non -Archaeological Resources Within the Study Area
Resource #
Resource Name
NRHP Status
Intersects
APE?
ON0263
House
Unevaluated (Surveyed Only)
No
ON0269
House
Unevaluated (Surveyed Only);
Gone
No
ON0336
Kellum School
Unevaluated (Surveyed Only)
No
ON0419
Benjamin Lee Parker House
Unevaluated (Surveyed Only)
Yes
Source: HPOWEB 2020.
All four archaeological sites mapped within the Study Area appear to be Prehistoric. Sites
310N180 and 310N181 yielded Middle Woodland ceramics (Classen 1979). No additional
information was available in the file provided by OSA. None of the sites appear to have been
assessed for NRHP eligibility.
Table 2: Archaeological Sites Within the Study Area
Site #
Site Type
Cultural/Temporal
Affiliation
NRHP Status
Intersects
APE .
31 ON180
Prehistoric
Middle Woodland
Unassessed for NRHP
No
31 ON181
Prehistoric
Middle Woodland
Unassessed for NRHP
No
31 ON182
Prehistoric
Unknown
Unassessed for NRHP
No
31 ON206
I Prehistoric
Unknown
Unassessed for NRHP
I No
Source: OSA files 2020; Claassen 1979.

BURNS k;ME-DONNELL
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
September 24, 2020
Page 3
A review of historic -age aerials and U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps of the
APE indicates that several buildings stood at the intersection of Ramsey Road and Drummer
Kellum Road near the center of the APE by 1943 but are no longer extant by 1977/1978 (USGS
1943, 1977, 1978). At least three cemeteries associated with the community are also depicted on
these later maps, though all are outside the proposed APE (USGS 1977 and 1978). Ramsey Road
in its current configuration was built between 1956 and 1977 (NETR 2020, USGS 1977). It
appears many of the buildings were razed prior to or during its construction. The proposed
Project would be underground and has little potential to impact historic -age non -archaeological
resources.
The proposed Project crosses Wolf Swamp east of the intersection of Ramsey Road and
Drummer Kellum Road. Soil along this perennial stream is mapped as Muckalee loam (MRCS
2020). These alluvial soils may have potential to harbor buried archaeological deposits, however,
may be disturbed from construction of the structure carrying Ramsey Road across the stream.
The map and imagery review also showed land use in the Project vicinity may affect the
likelihood of intact archaeological sites crossed by the Project. Most of the eastern half of the
Project has been under cultivation since at least 1956, while the western portion appears to be
active timber plantation. Archaeological deposits, if present, are likely to be disturbed.
Your review of and comments on this records review for the Piedmont Natural Gas Highway 17
NCDOT Distribution Replacement Project Ramsey Road is appreciated. A USACE Nationwide
Permit 12 is anticipated for the Project, and the USACE has previously requested that Piedmont
Natural Gas should follow your recommendations regarding any additional cultural resources
surveys.
Sincerely,
Shelly Wunderlich
Senior Cultural Resources Specialist
Attachment: Map Figures

BURNS`MSDONNELL
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
September 24, 2020
Page 4
cc: Steve Cahoon, Piedmont Natural Gas
Patrick Meier, Burns & McDonnell
Mike Dozci, Burns & McDonnell

BURNSMSDONNELL
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
September 24, 2020
Page 5
REFERENCES CITED
Claassen, Cheryl
1979 Onslow County Archaeological Assessment. Office of State Archaeology, NC
Division of Archives and History.
Nationwide Environmental Title Research (NETR)
2020 Historic Aerials Viewer. Electronic document,
https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer, accessed September 17, 2020.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
2020 Web Soil Survey. Electronic document, 2
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed
September 17, 2020.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
1943 Jacksonville 1:62,500 topographic quadrangle map. Reston, VA.
1977 Kellum 1:24,000 topographic quadrangle map. Reston, VA.
1978 Jacksonville North 1:24,000 topographic quadrangle map. Reston, VA.

ATTACHMENT 1 - MAP FIGURES

Path: Z:\Clients\TND\DukeEnrgyCar\118917_Hwy17DistRepl\Studies\Geospatial\DataFiles\ArcDocs\Hwy17_Project_Area_Fig-1.mxd jaclaussen 9/24/2020
01
J T
�1i
i
0*1
of
.:
pra
l enoir' "�11 i
'`r 4 Jones i �Pemlic '' r APE Figure 1
Duplin NOrth CaC011na j craven 1- NORTH Project Area Map
zv-_� BURNS Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution
Carteret
---- Onsiow 0 0.5 1 2 � M`DONNELL- Replacement Project Ramsey Road
1 Pender Piedmont Natural Gas
1\
Miles Onslow County, North Carolina

Path: Z:\Clients\TND\DukeEnrgyCar\118917_Hwy17DistRepl\Studies\Geospatial\DataFiles\ArcDocs\Hwy17_Project_Area_Fig-1.mxd jaclaussen 9/24/2020
Service Laver Credits: Esri HERE Garmin c O enStreetMa contributors[
AjrPo
Lookout
�f
— C, OJ
' N 'Jacksonville North `� ` _ f Kellum
KeU=
X l
- `�. `i,��� � 1`YL3mi#Firi'!/Jy�- •` ,��� r 1 r�i� r
Sandpi
r� t st}f.r1E 1,
rp
12 i 2
O�mirnun Ai
Lenoir Pamlico
'`r 4 Jones 1 . APE Figure 2
Duplin Craven`
North Carolina t �J1, Topographic Quad NORTH Project Area Map
"�-� f BURNS Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution
V Carteret
---- °°slow 0 0.5 1 2 N MgDONNELL° Replacement Project Ramsey Road
1 Pender Piedmont Natural Gas
y
Miles Onslow County, North Carolina
Source:ESRI, Burns & McDonnell Consultants, Inc. Issued: 9/24/2020

. N
' d
� 7 _•\ "�' �.. ,_�___[NUEFINPCP _P_OL'+1'll�— �I LC2'R / �t � _�-r�,_
�+r
r
o �-
- ON 3�38
ONO'269 13t� - — 9.Cem �1. `i•,vvvAA J
Tailings, 1
A��
a+ J 6� 1 \,•1� . �..� e� , $ p.. r�. ON0419
T1
4.'.� �:_ � �} V - I I J { �, k ;QN023
Tra lei
i3m Park')
CPm
jJ/[J SAY /'ti �f n
O
�•r Srli r r' r.. \\r' '`_ /r` �� FE'7'n 17and7i`s
_ 9
are Sn
''•f i�.Y'!� ,', �I II %„'+ � rC 1 �� `'-� %: .��� �"`' 6M rJ 4, _ �� \ "'yx:
Archaeological Site 9 Figure 3
Cultural Resources
Historic -Age Non -Archaeological Resource IvoRrH Background Review
Historic -Age Non -Archaeological Resource (Gone) WBURNS Highway 17 NCDOT Distribution
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 �M_DONNLL" O APE Replacement Project Ramsey Road
Piedmont Natural Gas
OStudy Area Miles Onslow County, North Carolina
Source:ESRI, Burns & McDonnell Consultants, Inc. ssue .

APPENDIX H - PNG PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED
ACCESS CORRIDOR PROTOCOL

PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
Permanently Maintained Access Corridor Protocol
To Comply with NC Water Quality General Certification No. 4133
To comply with the NC Water Quality General Certification No. 4133 condition for permanent maintained
access corridors in wetlands and across stream channels to not exceed 30 feet wide for gas utility lines,
Piedmont Natural Gas has implemented the following protocol.
Piedmont Natural Gas does not use herbicides to maintain vegetation on permanent access corridors.
Mowing equipment and tree trimming equipment is utilized where feasible to ensure there is a clear line
of sight of the pipeline corridor to perform inspections per Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) regulations. Much of the inspections are conducted using aerial patrols which is
why it is important to ensure the tree canopy does not cover the pipeline corridor.
Piedmont Natural Gas right-of-way(ROW) maintenance staff utilize GIS software to identify permanent
access corridors based on recorded property easement data imported to the company internal asset
management system. Note, the ROW maintenance staff do not use construction or permit drawings to
plan maintenance activities. Once a project obtains environmental permits and/or approvals, the
shapefile data of the jurisdictional features delineation is imported to the internal asset management
system, displaying on an environmental layer which allows the jurisdictional boundaries viewable by the
ROW maintenance staff when planning maintenance activities.
Piedmont Natural Gas ROW maintenance staff have been trained on the NC GC 4133 conditions for
permanent maintained access corridors and are aware of the allowable maintenance widths. Often it is
difficult to perform vegetation maintenance in wetlands and at stream channels where there is steep
terrain or wet conditions limiting vehicular use resulting in less than 30 feet maintained, thus complying
with the NC GC 4133.
January 2020