040011_INSPECTION_20201102

Facility Number=' ? Division of Soil and Water Conservation
t L
jOthec �� ., .
pe of Visit: 4Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: (}'Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
w
ite of Visit: %SI ; k� `;4.0 Arrival Time: '2(. /J Departure Time:IllEgra County: A vt.cc ,-i Region:!?
rm Name: (lC .,6 14' 5 to i vk e 014 14 Owner Email:
vner Name: Rt)%141.6P lAki 11/L`'r IVI Phone:
ailing Address:
iysical Address:
icility Contact: (L"`A`�I `-` U(c)''�`j Q 11 Title: Phone:
nsite Representative: � Integrator: V A
!tidied Operator: fit Certification Number:
ick-up Operator: Certification Number:
)cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish t( Layer —,L)ain k'.uw
j Wean to Feeder �Non-Layer \ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
`? Farrow to Wean Z t'V C Design Current = Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder j• a �'r Capacity,.;,-;; pp+ ;;- Non-Dairy
, i i
Farrow to Finish Layers - • Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
' Boars _„. Pullets fL> Beef Brood Cow
, ` � c Turke s - --.<, >� k
, r` t.,,-,,,,I,, �1 s me w .;,--4, 4 i-`-i Turkey Poults
" Other
�` Other �
)ischarges and Stream Impacts
. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No DNA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? /
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) l Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
?. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Mr-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

62•r; 2"-t)
Facility Number: H - (I (Date of Inspection: 3 ( ITT
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes LJ'/(ar ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ` NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 9 0
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [ ..eg" ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [io ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 13No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C t7 a r 4_( 3 f
13.Soil Type(s): f�it r • C d"."(tef
14.Do the receiving crops differ from hose designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [''f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? /
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Ill No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Inspections
❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: tet - Date of Inspection: 8, 4o624.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [[ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the facilityfail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did p p
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ra<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes a&Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
/eol„t..„5
1\(b kl 5
•p
t2./( C.(e�a- 066 1'i-
/09.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: \ i al Nk,tkPhone d`it3 3,- 3 5;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �/ C� Ckt4g0 Date: 3t b- 2-0
Page 3 of 3
2/4/2015