20100269 Ver 1_Application_20100409

v
9ti4., r
0
?s 9? ??IL7
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Na-
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE EUGENE A. CONTI, JR.
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
April 6, 2010
Ms. Liz Hair
USACE, Asheville Field Office
10 2 6
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 rl?
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Emergency Pipe Replacement on SR 1882 (Jack Whitener Road), Catawba
County
Dear Ms. Hair:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace a failed 68-foot long, 30"
CMP with a 68-foot long, 36" RCP on SR 1882 (Jack Whitener Road) in Catawba County. Five
feet of 11 riprap will be used at the pipe inlet and outlet for structural stabilization. The road
began collapsing on April 4, 2010 and the road was subsequently closed. The road is a heavily
travelled secondary road; therefore, this project is considered an emergency project and
construction will commence immediately. The existing pipe is at a 3.75% slope and the
inverts are at streambed elevation; however, immediately upstream of the pipe, the bed elevation
is -1.5 foot higher than the existing pipe invert and it appears that two large rocks are controlling
the upstream streambed grade. We propose to leave these rocks in place to prevent upstream
headcutting. Burying the new pipe would result in a almost a 5% slope; therefore, we propose to
place the new pipe at the same elevation and grade (3.75%) of the failed pipe. An 11-foot long
scourhole is located at the outlet. Since the new pipe will remain at -4% slope, we propose to
leave the scourhole in place to provide energy dissipation. The stream is a low flow stream with
limited aquatic life. Due to the existing site conditions, NCDOT requests a waiver from the
Regional Conditions 2(b) permit depth specification for the construction of this project.
Temporary cofferdams/pumping will be used to divert the stream around the construction site as
needed. Upon project completion, areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored
to pre-project conditions. The scope of the work will result in 10 feet of permanent impacts to
an unnamed tributary to Long Creek, which is classified as Class C Waters by the Division of
Water Quality.
The project area is not located within '/, mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 1882 a rural
or urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous
spill basin checklist.
Post Office Box 47 Shelby, North Carolina 28151-0047
SR 1882, Jack Whitener Road
Page 2
April 6, 2010
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Catawba County (USFWS listed date January 31, 2008) include the
dwarf flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nanii fora). National Heritage Program records document
the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location approximately 4.0 miles southeast of the proposed
project area. The heartleaf is typically found in acidic sandy loam soils along bluffs and nearby
slopes, hillsides and ravines, in boggy areas adjacent to creekheads and streams. The soil type is
the most important habitat requirement (Pacolet, Madison, or Musella types). The soil type in
the surrounding area is a Pacolet-Saw complex (8-15% slopes, moderately eroded); however
there is•no'poteniial habitat within the proposed project area and no species were observed. No
impact on the species is anticipated. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic
Places are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures.
The pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area (NCDOT Right of Way).
I have enclosed a pre-construction notification for a NW#3 (GC#3687), sketches of planned
activities and location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
0 Work order number: 150457-55120005-12.201811-3126
• TIP#: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration on this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: 1'??
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: Brian Wrenn, 40] /Transportation Permitting Unit, Division of Water Quality
Polly Lespinasse, Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office
O2?FryWjATF??OG
Olii? Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
I a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:

Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
I
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes N No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
If. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ®No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ®No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ®No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: SR 1882 (Jack Whitener Road)
2b. County: Catawba
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Maiden
2d. Subdivision name: NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 12 201811
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NCDOT Right of Way
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, stale, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mike Holder
4c. Business name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020
4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Trish Simon
5b. Business name
(if applicable): N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12
5c. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street
5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151
5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044
5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA
Latitude: 355991845 Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 81.1934510
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 10 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Long Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing 68-foot, 30" CMP on paved secondary road. Landuse is cropland and pasture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
80
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed work is to replace a failed pipe for the safety of the travelling public.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
NCDOT proposes to replace a failed 68-foot long, 30" CMP with a 68-foot long, 36" RCP with inlet headwall. The existing
pipe is at a 3.75% slope and is at streambed elevation. The upstream bed elevation is -1.5 foot higher than the existing
pipe invert. There are two large rocks immediately upstream of the pipe which appear to be controlling the upstream
streambed grade. We propose to leave these rocks in place to prevent upstream headcutting. Burying the new pipe
would result in a almost a 5% slope; therefore, we propose to place the new pipe at the same elevation and grade
(3.75%)of the failed pipe. An 11-foot long scourhole is located at the outlet. We propose to leave the scourhole in place
to provide energy dissipation since the new pipe will remain at -4%. Approximately five feet of riprap will be used at the
pipe inlet and outlet for structural stabilization. Temporary cofferdams/pumping will be used to divert the stream around
the construction site as needed. Area affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored back to pre-project
conditions. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.).
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by
Division 12 DEC.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes ®No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)

S1 ®P ? T Riprap
stabilization at
Ut to Long Creek ? PER
® INT ® Corps
® DWQ
2.5
10
inlet/oute{
S2 ? P ®T Cofferdam/ Ut to Long Creek ? PER ® Corps 2
5 20
bypass pumping ® INT ® DWQ .
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 30
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
? Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary (T) impact re uired?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
63 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The new pipe will be placed at the same slope (3.75%) and elevation of the failed pipe in order to prevent upstream
headcutting. An existing 11-foot long outlet scourhole will be left for energy dissipation.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The upstream channel is -1.5 feet higher than the invert of the pipe and appears to be held by two large rocks in the stream
channel. These rocks, which are located immediately upstream of the pipe, will be left in place to prevent headcutting of the
upstream channel. Minimization of impacts by installing appropriate erosion control measures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
41b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes No
? ?
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NA %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, na rrative description of the plan:
Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. (Implementation, management, and inspection of erosion
control devices and control of discharge sources lie. construction equipment).
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NA
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
? HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments: NA
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and wil l not result in
additional development which could impact water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ® No
impacts?
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program database.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ®No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The State Historic Preservation office resources and the National Register of Historic Places were reviewed for historic
sites in the vicinity of the project; however, the pipe replacement project occurs within a previously impacted area
(NCDOT Right of Way).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panel number: 370050 0280B
-7 11-6-10
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Emergency Pipe
Replacement, SR 1882,
Jack Whitener Road
Catawba County
Outlet Downstream
Inlet/Upstream
:c snr.
R S
.
-FTT-
-FT-T
u
1= _
s,

e
0

{ 7 K
{_ < I
(D (D
1+
u Qi
(G N { II
O ?t x
{ m {
1
o ' O r<
m " 1 4-1

L !
°s
p <
7 0
0{
f o
-
Z
-
o
3 u

0 + 7 7 7 0
?
"
1 m
; T
h,?1 -? ? rrf
3
„
„
C n Co T O
O m
v

a ?4
d R}
f
& S f S S

-
i
- T ?Y'
n I
S?
° X O
o a
3 n fp C
+ { <
O?
o.n j (D II
O p a rtl
70
0 C') m CD
O ii
?

., 0
i
s N 7
m
n. o
0 0 `i'-
- O
O a0

o a + 7 7
7
a

II
f oo 1 +1
44?
. Fe'
n
E *
3 rn Po Oi O
co
i s
M ° o n Lo
t u ?,---€€€ R_

0
0
Lo CD =j- ?•, -.
cl (D
m p'.. .. .

N Z
? =R.
.p
z A
m 7
cn
N
bun q.L Pmen

?N
d
i
F R$?
at?Y
e [
^
2
?
?
MO L
Q
F
Alf! a•

g4?FFR? ??• ???r ?
N ]. }? ?. A? l H P V ?t
B
?`pp

R a
?'1
A
n t
?
...

dy?a n
-
? :i
G

C;,?' • z

?? Aa
4

i

i ;,a? S
pa sN9
-
i 2 ?x 3 { R °?so

i Sr ?qa °
.
e
,'? S Ch
i ? Rd

\ a9?
\ Y9P

•
? o

1
1

i

L
0 i
?
n
x
n ?
0 ?
£ + m
v
o m p
i m
n v
p a
m
m S
c z
N ?
z p
n m jK
N

UT to Long Creek, SR 1882
(Jack Whitener Road), Catawba County

q' 1877
1 ? 6 I ?`
o .. .• `/;
.- \ ! SR 206 ? \
797

(' 0
I \
?
,`
?
SR 201j .. ?
? l
?,
, SR 2118'
?\,
9? =\ .
( a

= r Emergency Pipe Replacement
?1 I SR ! \
?jj 1880 N? I )? ??

Sp,2073 2
!) '' , o SR 1874 cn m ?'
' .
SR 1873
-
..
i 1
_

U ?
?;'. A>i SjZ? 1? SR 186 '•? ?

_ ?g? ,. •,o ?. I w-::. ?_ o°-- ? _? - m'? ? y 101 CP$'
?L-- SR 2()04 y . 1?1 N-
ry
.. SR 2111

_

v?s9

N `? ?,L11

5
SR le
CO
'
i
h yl
ss
,
N
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 Miles
I I I I I I I I I

'
•
.. \ +`' _
.s ;,
... a
,
. ? ..
,
t

r
I _
•

Emergency pipe

replacement

!l ! I s)

1 n

.
r.1 -
7.1•
- _
.
u
r 1 1
l.. _

?y
e4 3
Name : MAIDEN Location: 035.5991845°N 081.1934510°W
Date: 4/612010 Caption: Emergency Pipe Replacement, SR 1882 (Jack Whitener Road)

Scale:
1 inch equals 1000 feet
Ut to Long Branch, Class C waters, Catawba Basin ,
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: I1) County: Cgtawha Project ID: 12.201811
River Basin: Catawba Bridge No: NA
Route: SR 1882, Jack Whitener Road Stream: Ut to Long Creek
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS F W
ORW F W,
WSJ r r
WS 11,111 OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area F
Fv-
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Yes No
Arterial Urban F
Arterial Rural F
Additional Site Information:
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
Yes No
F V
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).