20181271 Ver 1_MP FINAL_2020_20201126

MITIGATION PLAN
FINAL

October 5, 2020
HONEY MILL MITIGATION SITE
Surry County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7619
DMS ID No. 100083

Yadkin River Basin
HUC 03040101

USACE Action ID No. SAW-2018-01789
NC DWR No. 20181271
RFP #: 16-00746 (Issued 12/7/2017)

PREPARED FOR:

NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]

This mitigation Plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory
mitigation.
Contributing Staff:
Aaron Earley, PE, CFM Project Manager
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge
Ian Eckardt, PWS, Wetland Delineations
Ella Wickliff, Project Scientist

Christine Blackwelder, Stream Design
Jesse Kelley, Construction Documents
Emily Reinicker, PE, CFM, Lead Quality Assurance

October 5, 2020

Regulatory Division

Re: NCIRT Review and USACE Approval of the NCDMS Honey Mill Mitigation Site / Surry Co./
SAW-2018-01789/ NCDMS Project # 100083

Mr. Tim Baumgartner
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

Dear Mr. Baumgartner:

The purpose of this letter is to provide the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) with all comments generated by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team
(NCIRT) during the 30-day comment period for the Honey Mill Draft Mitigation Plan, which closed
on August 22, 2020. These comments are attached for your review.

Based on our review of these comments, we have determined that no major concerns
have been identified with the Draft Mitigation Plan, which is considered approved with this
correspondence. However, several minor issues were identified, as described in the attached
comment memo, which must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan.

The Final Mitigation Plan is to be submitted with the Preconstruction Notification (PCN)
Application for Nationwide permit approval of the project along with a copy of this letter. Issues
identified above must be addressed in the Final Mitigation Plan. All changes made to the Final
Mitigation Plan should be summarized in an errata sheet included at the beginning of the
document. If it is determined that the project does not require a Department of the Army permit,
you must still provide a copy of the Final Mitigation Plan, along with a copy of this letter, to the
appropriate USACE field office at least 30 days in advance of beginning construction of the
project. Please note that this approval does not preclude the inclusion of permit conditions in
the permit authorization for the project, particularly if issues mentioned above are not
satisfactorily addressed. Additionally, this letter provides initial approval for the Mitigation Plan,
but this does not guarantee that the project will generate the requested amount of mitigation
credit. As you are aware, unforeseen issues may arise during construction or monitoring of the
project that may require maintenance or reconstruction that may lead to reduced credit.

REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
69 DARLINGTON AVENUE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1343

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and if you have any questions
regarding this letter, the mitigation plan review process, or the requirements of the Mitigation
Rule, please call me at 919-554-4884, ext 60.

Sincerely,

Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
for Ronnie Smith, Deputy Chief
USACE Regulatory Division

Enclosures

Electronic Copies Furnished:

NCIRT Distribution List
Paul Wiesner, Kelly Phillips—NCDMS
Aaron Earley—WEI

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203

October 5, 2020

Ms. Kim Browning
Mitigation Project Manager
United States Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403-1343

Subject: Mitigation Plan Report and Construction Plans
Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County
Yadkin River Basin HUC 03040101
DMS Project ID #100083
USACE #SAW-2018-01789

Dear Ms. Browning:
Thank you for your September 15, 2020 comment letter for the Honey Mill Mitigation Site draft
mitigation report and plans. We have made the necessary revisions to the draft documents and we are
submitting revised versions of the documents along with this letter. Below we provide your comments
followed by our responses in bold italics.

WRC Comments, Andrea Leslie
1) As noted previously in an early review letter provided directly to the applicant, wild trout
reproduction should not be impacted by this project, and a trout moratorium is not needed.
a) Noted – thank you.
2) Sambucus nigra is a European species of elderberry, but sometimes the native elderberry is included
in this group. Ensure that they are using the native elderberry (Sambucus canadensis).
a) This error has been fixed. The native elderberry (Sambucus cavadensis) now replaces the
European elderberry in the planting table.
3) Sweetbay magnolia is primarily a coastal plain species. Although it might be found in rare seepage
wetlands in this part of the state, it would not occur as a native species on typical stream banks.
a) Sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana) has been removed from the planting list.
4) Lindera melissifolia is a federally listed species of boggy coastal plain sites. Do they mean Lindera
benzoin, which would be a fine understory planting?
a) This error has been fixed. Spicebush (Lindera benzoin) is now listed in the planting table.
5) River birch is not often found on small streams – it’s typically associated with large rivers. Unless it is
found on site already, we recommend eliminating it and replacing it with something else.
Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 2 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

a) River birch (Betula nigra) has been removed from the planting list. Wildlands has made this
change due to the site being on the edge of its native range in NC rather than it’s association
with larger streams. Matthews (2011) supports that river birch is frequently associated with
small stream and narrow floodplains in addition to palustrine areas.
6) Acer negundo is also typically associated with larger streams, as well.
a) While boxelder (Acer negundo) is commonly associated with larger streams and natural levee
forests, it is also found in floodplains and palustrine areas of smaller streams (LeGrand et al.,
2020; Matthews, 2011; Schafale & Weakley, 1990). Wildlands argues that boxelder is an
appropriate planted species for this site at the proposed planting rate since it is documented
to inhabit floodplains of smaller streams as documented by LeGrand et al. (2020) and
Matthews (2011). Furthermore, boxelder grows quickly in open areas and serves as a valuable
‘nurse tree’ providing more favorable growing conditions for slower grower tree species (i.e.
oaks) that establish better in partially shaded environments.
7) Eliminate silver maple from the planting list –it is very limited in North Carolina, and it wouldn’t be
found on small streams.
a) Silver maple (Acer saccharinum) has been removed from the planting list.
8) Cut down on the % of sycamore planted (20% of stems).
a) Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) has been reduced to 15% of stems in the riparian planting
zone.
9) It appears that ‘riparian planting’ areas will not include understory species. The ‘shaded
supplemental planting’ list has a nice diversity of subcanopy and shrub layers – we recommend
bringing some of these species into the ‘riparian planting’ areas. Could they include other species
already found on site in the riparian planting list?
a) American strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus), red mulberry (Morus rubra) and witch
hazel (Hamamelis virginiana) have been added to the riparian planting zone list. Additionally,
paw paw (Asimina triloba) and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum) will also occupy the
subcanopy layer in this planting zone.

WRC Comments, Travis Wilson
10) The draft plan does not include a detail of the stream crossings. It states the crossings are all
existing utility, ford, or culvert crossing but then mentions the culverts will be buried. Therefore, I
am assuming the crossing locations are existing but the structures will be reset to the restored
profile. If that is the case a detail showing the ford crossing and the culvert crossing should be
included.
a) A culvert crossing detail and a ford crossing detail are now provided. Please see detail
1/6.10 and 2/6.10 in the plans.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 3 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

EPA Comments, Todd Bowers
11) I wish to convey that I while I understand that Surry County is considered “mountain” for the
purposes of generating mitigation credit, this site does not seem to meet the qualification of a
“mountain stream” but rather a “piedmont stream”. I have several reasons for this consideration.
a) The site elevation ranges within the current proposed conservation easement between
approximately 980- and 1,050-feet above sea level. According the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission, “the piedmont physiographic ecoregion elevations range from about 1,500 feet in
the foothills to about 200 feet at the fall line.” This site would be located in the piedmont from
that perspective.
b) According to the sponsor and the draft mitigation plan, “the Site is located in the Tugaloo
terrane of the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS, 2018). The Piedmont Province is
characterized by rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges, with elevations ranging from
300 to 1500 feet above sea level.”
c) Cool water streams, while more common in the mountains of North Carolina, do exist widely in
the NC piedmont.
d) Many of the reference sites used to guide restoration of the site streams are located in the
piedmont ecoregion. According to the sponsor, “due to the variety of slopes and project stream
types present on the Site, the distribution of reference reaches is wide, throughout North
Carolina’s foothills and western Piedmont.”
e) The NC SAM zone used to evaluate the streams within the project boundaries is listed as
“Piedmont”.
f) According to Section 7.3.5 (Page 15-16), Wildlands developed a regional flood frequency
analysis tool that tailored the USGS 2009 publication “Magnitude and Frequency of Rural
Floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006” to the Piedmont of North Carolina and
used several gages located in the Piedmont to develop flood frequency intervals for the project
streams.
i) Wildlands acknowledges your above considerations.
12) Since the site appears to have more piedmont than mountain characteristics, I highly recommend
that the sponsor reconsider the minimum buffer widths and conservation easement boundaries of
this project. The draft mitigation plan lists several instances where discreet constructed BMPs are
needed to offset drainage and polluted runoff from the surrounding landscape. The land
surrounding the site will continue to be used for livestock grazing following the establishment of
the conservation easement and completed fencing. The primary stressor on water quality for the
project streams will continue to be runoff from livestock excrement and the best BMP to counter
this stress is wider vegetated stream buffers. The sponsor even states on page 23 that additional
floodplain vegetation would lower the risk to the site from agricultural runoff. Therefore, I
recommend that the site incorporate 50-foot minimum riparian buffer widths. This will have the
added effect of protecting the stream floodplains and the pockets of wetlands contained within.
a) While Wildlands agrees that wider buffers always offer greater protection, we have provided
the required buffer widths as outlined in the governing rules and regulations (Wilmington
District 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the October 24, 2016 Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update). Our option agreements were set for 30-foot buffers
based on this guidance during the proposal stage of the project. The easements for the site
Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 4 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

are recorded with the 30-foot buffers presented in the plans.
13) I recommend that the vegetation height requirement for satisfactory performance of vegetative
vigor be increased from 8 to 10 feet at the conclusion of the 7- year monitoring period. The
elevation of the project is not sufficiently high enough to warrant the use of the lower standard
used for mountain streams.
a) Wildlands has set the vegetation height standards per requirements set forth in Section V.B.2
in the NC IRT October 24, 2016 Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update – no
change has been made.
14) With the recommended wider buffers, I also recommend a corresponding increase in the number
of vegetation plots to monitor the vigor of planted trees.
a) The number of vegetation plots presented corresponds to the required buffer width recorded
and presented in the plan – no change has been made.
15) The planting plan for the site appears adequate and appropriate for both canopy and subcanopy
species. Recommend listing the species that will be considered for the final height requirement
performance standard as some will not likely meet the 10-foot requirement at the end of the
proposed monitoring period; namely those considered for shaded supplemental planting. I also
recommend that any significant deviations from the planting plan are approved by the IRT before
purchase and planting.
a) Species that will not be considered for the final height requirement are indicated in the tables
by an asterisk. They include red mulberry (Morus rubra), sourwood (Oxydendrum arborea),
paw paw (Asimina triloba), witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), American strawberry bush
(Euonymus americanus), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), sweetshrub (Calycanthus floridus),
spicebush (Lindera benzoin), flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), and American holly (Ilex
opaca).

USACE Comments, Kim Browning
16) Figure 9: the veg plot on Venable Creek R2 should be relocated to the confluence of R3 and
UT2, to include the existing wetland.
a) The vegetation plot was relocated to the wetland at the confluence of Venable Creek
Reach 3 and UT2.
17) Design sheets general note: Please ensure that when measuring the centerline of the channel for
crediting purposes that only one channel is measured at a confluence. An example is on Sheet 2.36
where it appears that both channels are measured. Additionally, please ensure that the centerline
is used for crediting determination, not the thalweg. This is unclear on sheets 2.1 and 2.5.
a) Station callouts and crediting were adjusted at the tributary confluences, and centerline
adjustments were made on Venable Creek Reach 1, 2, and 4.
18) Field notes indicate that the confluence of UT2 and UT2A is a wetland complex and would be best
suited as a wetland. This plan proposes single-thread restoration in this area. Please note the
concern of the IRT for this area to demonstrate wetland like characteristics and be willing to
document a single-thread channel throughout the monitoring period.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 5 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

b) Visual documentation of a single-thread channel on UT2 Reach 2 through the wetland
complex throughout the monitoring period has been added to the monitoring criteria. See
Section 8.1.2 of the revised mitigation plan.
19) Page 6 discusses UT2B; I’m unclear where this is on the Figures. (Perhaps it’s the small
unlabeled line outside the easement?)
a) UT2B was added to the figures. UT2B is located just upstream of the Venable Creek
Reach 3 and Reach 4 break.
20) Section 7.2.4: It would be interesting to note the approximate number of mature trees that are
left on-site in areas where restoration will occur and note the survival rate of these existing trees
through the monitoring period. On the Agony Acres site, we noticed that a large number of
mature trees that were left in the buffer were actually damaged during construction and began
to die between MY4 and MY5. This is just an observation and the data would be interesting to
see, not just on this site.
a) Wildlands has added two monitoring photo points to visually assess representative mature
tree save areas. The location of these photo points will be established post-construction.
Please reference Table 16, note 8, in the mitigation plan.
21) Section 7.1: It would be beneficial to discuss the potential for utility line maintenance, and the
road culverts to be replaced/widened on Siloam Rd (UT1) and Little Mountain Church Rd
(Venable Creek R1). It appears that the conservation easement is at least 50 ft from the road
right-of-way, which is appreciated.
a) This discussion is now included in Section 7.10, Project Risks and Uncertainties.
22) Section 7.9: There is some concern regarding the fact that the landowner is responsible for
installing the livestock watering facilities in relation to the fact that at least one of the crossings is
a ford crossing. Please confirm that these crossings will not be used for livestock access for
drinking if the landowner fails to install the watering tanks.
a) The ford crossing is in an internal easement break and will be fenced, gated, and only used
for coordinated crossing events. The conservation easement language requires the
landowner to restrict livestock access in the conservation easement. Table 14 outlines that
livestock will only access the ford during coordinated crossing events.

DWR Comments, Erin Davis
23) Page 4, Section 3.2 – DWR appreciates that Surry County planning documents were reviewed for
this plan.
a) Noted – thank you.
24) Page 6, Section 3.4 – Is the location of UT2B mapped on any of the plan figures? If not, can the
approximate location please be called out on Figure 2 (within and/or outside of the easement).
a) UT2B was added to the figures. UT2B is located just upstream of the Venable Creek Reach 3
and Reach 4 break.
25) Page 9, Section 4.1 – There are five BMPs shown on Figure 9, but only four points of inputs are
mentioned in the text. Please clarify.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 6 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

b) This section now references five potential agricultural input areas. Please refer to Section 7.7
for discussion on the BMPs.
26) Page 10, Section 4.5 – There are two areas of Wetland C that aren’t captured within the
conservation easement. Was protection of these resource areas discussed during site planning?
a) Wetland C is heavily accessed by cattle currently. The portion of the wetland not within the
conservation easement is an area required by the landowner to access the culvert crossing on
UT2. The local topography prohibited another approach to this crossing. Wildlands has
accounted for the impact to this wetland in the PCN.
27) Page 11, Section 5.3 – DWR requests a groundwater gauge be installed in existing Wetland K where
hydrology may be impacted by proposed stream relocation in order to demonstrate no significant
functional loss of the resource.
a) The existing onsite wetlands are not proposed for mitigation credit; therefore, no
groundwater gauges are proposed.
28) Page 13, Section 7.1 – This section notes that wetland hydrology was assessed with groundwater
gages. I suspect this is a carryover, but if gage data is available please include it in the final
mitigation plan.
a) Wetland hydrology was not assessed with gauges since wetlands are not proposed for
mitigation credit. The erroneous reference has been removed from Section 7.1.
29) Page 21, Section 7.6 – DWR appreciates that an effort was made to capture the tributary origins
within the conservation easement. Please confirm whether the UT2 stream origin is included
(Sheet 2.12), and if it’s not please explain why not (e.g. UT2A ends at property line).
a) UT2’s intermittent origin is within the conservation easement.
30) Page 22, Section 7.8 – Please include at least one target community for the proposed planting plan.
DWR would like to see a mix of early successional native species and appropriate climax species
based on the designated target community.
a) This information is now included in Section 7.8.
31) Page 26, Table 15 – There are differences in the goals and objectives compared to Table 6. Please
review.
a) Goals and objectives from Tables 6 and 15 now match.
32) Page 29, Section 10 – DWR recommends an annual inspection of the site.
a) This language comes from the most recent DMS mitigation plan template (June 2017). DMS
let us know this language was reviewed by the IRT and DEQ Stewardship prior to the issuance
of the mitigation plan template and guidance. DMS has requested that the approved
language remain in the mitigation plan as provided. Per DEQ Stewardship, DMS mitigation
sites accepted by the DEQ Stewardship program will be inspected every one to three
(maximum) years. Language in Table 18 has been updated to reflect the one to three year
inspection frequency.
33) Page 30, Section 11 – Please confirm whether Wildlands or DMS would notify the NCIRT of site
issues.
a) The section now states that Wildlands and DMS will coordinate with the IRT if remedial
actions are necessary.
Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 7 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

34) Page 30, Section 12 – The memo referenced for the credit ratios includes a summary table in which
management objectives for UT2R1, UT2A, UT3R1, UT4, UT5, and UT6R1 specifies “spot repair
erosion and incision”. However, only design sheets for UT4 show any stream work. Please explain
why spot erosion and incision areas identified during the proposal stage were not addressed in the
design stage.
a) The proposal approaches were field walked with the IRT, who noted less impacts than
observed by Wildlands field scientists during proposal development. The IRT reduced
crediting ratios on these streams to reflect the reduced approaches. Please refer to the IRT
meeting minutes and mapping in Appendix 6.
35) Figure 9 – DWR requests the veg plot along Venable Creek Reach 2 be shifted downstream to near
the next set of cross sections along Reach 3.
a) The vegetation plot was shifted to incorporate the wetland at the confluence of Venable
Creek Reach 3 and UT2.
36) Appendix 3 – Was NCWAM completed for the existing wetlands onsite? If so, please include the
corresponding forms. Also, two of the NCSAM rating sheets did not include an overall rating score,
please QAQC.
a) NCWAM forms were not completed since the existing wetlands are not proposed for
mitigation credit. NCSAM forms for Venable Creek 3, UT3 Reach 2, and UT4 have been
updated.
37) Sheet 0.3 – Please include roadway right-of-way boundary lines.
a) The parcel boundary lines indicate the 60’ right-of-way on Siloam Road and the 50’ right-of-
way on Venable Farm Road. No additional lines were added.
38) Sheet 2.1 – Are there any existing utility poles located within the internal crossing?
a) There are no utility poles within the internal crossing.
39) Sheet 2.2 – Will the existing farm road be relocated just outside of the easement? Are impacts to
Wetland B expected/accounted for?
a) The existing farm road will be relocated outside of the easement. All wetland impacts are
accounted for in the PCN.
40) Sheet 2.2 – The BMP detail (Sheet 6.9) includes an outlet channel, please show the approximate
location of this outlet channel on the plan view sheets (Sheets 2.2, 2.7 and 2.34).
a) This information has been added.
41) Sheet 2.12 – The Enhancement II Treatment Note #4 is confusing to see on sheets that do not show
any grading (Sheets 2.12-2.15, 2.18-2.22, 2.24-2.26 and 2.32). If spot grading is proposed, please
show on the sheets.
a) The Enhancement II treatment notes were revised for each plan sheet and areas receiving
spot grading are indicated on the plans.
42) Sheet 2.12 & 2.32 – Figure 2 indicates headcuts in the upper sections of UT2 and UT5. No stream
work is proposed for these reaches. Is further instability of these headcuts a concern? Monitoring
photo points may be helpful at these locations.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 8 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

b) The proposal approaches were field walked with the IRT, who noted less impacts than
observed by Wildlands field scientists during proposal development. The IRT reduced
crediting ratios on these streams to reflect the reduced approaches. Please refer to the IRT
meeting minutes and mapping in Appendix 6. Photo points will be added to monitor the
areas of concern on UT2 and UT5.
43) Sheet 2.16 – Please include a typical detail for the proposed culvert crossing.
a) This detail is now included. Please see detail 2/6.10.
44) Sheet 2.3 – DWR recommends that bench width be at least 1.5 times bankfull width. Particularly of
concern are the bench widths on the outer meander bends where much of the flow energy vectors
are directed.
a) Brush toe will be installed along the outer meander bend to add stability to the streambanks
and help prevent meander migration.
45) Sheet 2.4 – UT2 and UT3 are designed to tie in to Venable Creek at meander bends rather than riffle
straights. Are there any long-term stability concerns for these meander areas?
a) The elevation at the downstream extent of both streams match the downstream head of
riffle elevation on Venable Creek, and these bends are protected with brush toe, which will
prevent meander migration. Wildlands does not have long term stability concerns for these
ties.
46) Sheet 2.8 – A ford crossing detail was not provided. With the existing bedrock I understand that the
streambed doesn’t require reinforcement, but are the side slopes/access path areas stable? Is any
grading proposed? Will any riprap be placed along the banks?
a) This detail is now included. Please see detail 1/6.10.
47) Sheet 3.1 –
a) DWR questions whether sweetbay magnolia is an appropriate species for site based on the
species geographic range
i) Sweetbay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana) has been removed from the planting list.
b) It would be helpful for our review to have the wetland indicator status included in the tables.
i) The wetland indicator status has been added for each species.
c) DWR understands that quantity substitutions may be necessary based on the nursery’s species
available. However, we request that no species (excluding live stakes) account for more than
20 percentage of a specified planting zone in order to promote diversity within the designated
community type.
i) All riparian planting zone species are below 20 percent of total planted stems.
48) Sheet 6.9 – Will herbaceous plugs be installed in the shallow water planting zone of the
bioretention cells? I think fox sedge is the only OBL species in proposed seed mix.
a) Herbaceous plugs and wetland bare roots will be planted within the shallow water zone in
the BMP.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County Page 9 of 9
October 5, 2020 IRT Comment Response

50) Are channel plugs proposed? If so, please indicate approximate locations and include a typical
detail.
a) Channel plugs are not proposed within the plans. Channel plugs may be installed during
construction, if needed, at the discretion of the engineer.
51) Please include an overall fencing plan indicating existing and proposed fencing and approximate
locations of anticipated gates.
a) A fencing plan is now included with the plans. See sheets 7.1-7.6.

Please contact me at 704-332-7754 extension 109 if you have any questions.
Thank you,

Aaron Earley, PE, CFM
Senior Water Resources Engineer

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page i October 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1
2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection ...................................................................................1
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions ..............................................................................................2
3.1 Landscape Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 2
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover .................................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Existing Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 4
3.4 Project Resources ......................................................................................................................... 5
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential .......................................................................................................9
4.1 Hydrology ...................................................................................................................................... 9
4.2 Hydraulics ..................................................................................................................................... 9
4.3 Channel Geomorphology .............................................................................................................. 9
4.4 Physicochemical............................................................................................................................ 9
4.5 Biology ........................................................................................................................................ 10
4.6 Overall Functional Uplift Potential ............................................................................................. 10
4.7 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift ........................................................................................... 10
5.0 Regulatory Considerations ..................................................................................................... 11
5.1 Biological and Cultural Resources............................................................................................... 11
5.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass ............................................................. 11
5.3 401/404 ...................................................................................................................................... 11
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................... 12
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan ........................................................................... 13
7.1 Design Approach Overview ........................................................................................................ 13
7.2 Reference Streams ...................................................................................................................... 13
7.3 Design Discharge Analysis........................................................................................................... 15
7.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters ............................................................................... 17
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis ...................................................................................................... 19
7.6 Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 21
7.7 Onsite Best Management Practices ............................................................................................ 22
7.8 Vegetation and Planting Plan ..................................................................................................... 22
Utilities, Stream Crossings, and Site Access ............................................................................... 23
7.10 Project Risk and Uncertainties .................................................................................................... 23
8.0 Performance Standards ......................................................................................................... 24
8.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability ......................................................... 24
8.2 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................... 24
8.3 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................. 25
8.4 Other Parameters ....................................................................................................................... 25
9.0 Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................... 25
9.1 Monitoring Components ............................................................................................................ 26
10.0 Long-Term Management Plan ................................................................................................ 29
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan ................................................................................................... 30
12.0 Determination of Credits ....................................................................................................... 30
13.0 References ............................................................................................................................ 32

TABLES
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1 ......................................................................................................... 1
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2 ......................................................................................................... 2

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page ii October 2020
Table 3: Project Soil Types and Descriptions ................................................................................................ 3
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 3 ......................................................................................................... 8
Table 5: Project Attribute Table Part 4 ....................................................................................................... 11
Table 6: Mitigation Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................... 12
Table 7: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters .......................................... 13
Table 8: Summary of Design Discharge Analysis for Restoration Reaches ................................................. 16
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters for Venable Creek ......................................................... 17
Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT1 and UT3 .......................................................... 18
Table 11: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT2 ........................................................................ 18
Table 12: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT2 ........................................................................ 19
Table 13: Results of Competence Analysis ................................................................................................. 20
Table 14: Crossings Summary ..................................................................................................................... 23
Table 15: Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................................................... 26
Table 16: Monitoring Components ............................................................................................................. 27
Table 17: Monitoring Components ............................................................................................................. 28
Table 18: Long-term Management Plan ..................................................................................................... 29
Table 19: Project Asset Table ...................................................................................................................... 31

FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Watershed Map
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5 Soils Map
Figure 6 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Figure 7 Design Discharge Analysis
Figure 8 Concept Design Map
Figure 9 Monitoring Components Map

APPENDICES
Appendix 1 Historic Aerial Photos
Appendix 2 Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Appendix 3 DWR and NCSAM Identification Forms
Appendix 4 Supplementary Design Information
Appendix 5 Categorical Exclusion and Resource Agency Correspondence
Appendix 6 NCIRT Communications
Appendix 7 Invasive Species Treatment Plan
Appendix 8 Site Protection Instrument
Appendix 9 Maintenance Plan
Appendix 10 Financial Assurance
Appendix 11 Credit Release Schedule
Appendix 12 Preliminary Plans

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1 October 2020
1.0 Introduction
The Honey Mill Mitigation Site (Site) is in Surry County approximately 5 miles south of Mount Airy and 7
miles northeast of Dobson (Figure 1). Venable Creek, a tributary to the Ararat River, and its associated
tributaries will be restored and enhanced as part of this project. The Ararat River drains to the Yadkin
River. The Yadkin-Pee Dee river basin covers an area of 7,200 square miles and many waters within the
basin have been given a rating of impaired. The site is located within the Rutledge, Stoney and Flat Shoal
Creek – Ararat River targeted local watershed Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040101110020 and is
proposed for mitigation credit in the Upper Yadkin Catalog Unit 03040101 (Yadkin 01).
Eight unnamed tributaries (UT’s) to Venable Creek (UT1, UT2, UT2A, UT2B UT3, UT4 UT5, and UT6) flow
through the Site, as depicted in Figure 2. The Site streams are in various stages of impairment related to
the current and historical agricultural land uses. The project proposes to restore, enhance, and preserve
8,901 existing linear feet of streams. The work proposed on the Site will provide 4,793.432 cool stream
credits and will be protected in perpetuity by a 20.2-acre conservation easement as outlined in the Site
Protection Instrument (Appendix 8).
The Site was instituted via the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS) RFP # 16-007406. As approved by the North Carolina Interagency
Review Team (NCIRT), all projects contracted under RFP # 16-007406 have a cool or warm service type.
Penalties will not be assessed for using these project mitigation credits to satisfy cool or warm
requirements
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1
Project Information
Project Name Honey Mill Mitigation Site
County Surry
Project Area (acres) 20.2
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36° 25' 38.06"N 80° 36' 43.19"W
Planted Acreage (acres of woody stems planted) 5 acres (full planting) plus
supplemental planting

2.0 Watershed Approach and Site Selection
The Site was selected based on its potential to support the objectives and goals of multiple conservation
and watershed planning documents, outlined below.
• The 2009 Upper Yadkin River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) states that a portion of the
middle Ararat River in this watershed is impaired by turbidity and habitat degradation (DWQ,
2008) and links the impairment to degraded riparian buffers and unstable streambanks.
Watershed goals outlined in the RBRP include restoration of water quality and aquatic habitat in
impaired streams and implementation of agricultural BMPs in order to limit sediment, nutrients,
and fecal coliform inputs to streams from active farming operations.
• The 2015 North Carolina Wildlife Resource Communion’s (NCWRC) Wildlife Action Plan (WAP)
notes that streams in the Yadkin River basin are impacted by excessive sedimentation and
changes in hydrology and geomorphology due to development, agriculture, and instream
mining. Water quality is also degraded due to excessive nutrient inputs from agriculture and

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 2 October 2020
other wastewater discharges. The WAP discusses the importance of habitat conservation and
restoration to address current problems affecting species and habitats.
The proposed project will exclude livestock, create stable stream banks, convert pasture to forest, and
implement BMPs to filter agricultural runoff. These actions will address stressors identified in the RBRP
and the WAP by reducing fecal, nutrient, and sediment inputs to project streams, and ultimately to the
Ararat River, and will reconnect instream and terrestrial habitats on the Site to upstream and
downstream resources. Approximately 20.2-acres of land will be placed under permanent conservation
easement to protect the Site in perpetuity.
3.0 Baseline and Existing Conditions
The Site watershed (Table 2 and Figure 3) is in the northern portion of the Yadkin 01. It is situated in
rural Surry County south of Mount Airy and northeast of Dobson, NC. The following sections describe
the existing conditions of the Site, watershed, and watershed processes, including disturbance and
response.
Table 2: Project Attribute Table Part 2
Project Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin River
USGS HUC (8 digit, 14 digit) 03040101, 03040101110020
NCDWR Sub-basin 03-07-03
Project Drainage Area (acres) 705
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 0.8%
2011 NLCD Land Use Classification
Forest 65%
Agricultural 21%
Developed 9%
Shrub/Scrub 5%

3.1 Landscape Characteristics
3.1.1 Physiography, Topography, Geology, and Soils
The Site is located in the Tugaloo terrane of the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS, 2018). The
Piedmont Province is characterized by rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges, with elevations
ranging from 300 to 1500 feet above sea level. The Site topography, as indicated on the Mount Airy
South, NC USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle, shows a gradually sloped valley running through
the center of the Site (Figure 3). The Tugaloo terrane is composed of metamorphosed sedimentary and
volcanic rocks deposited on rifted continental and younger oceanic crust. The underlying geology of the
Site is mapped as Late Proterozoic to Cambrian (500 to 900 million years in age) banded gneiss (CZbb).
The unit is described as interlayered with calc-silicate rock, metaconglomerate, amphibolite, sillimanite-
mica schist, and granitic rock. Instances of exposed bedrock along project channels are mapped on
Figure 2. Bedrock depth observed in areas proposed for stream restoration were several feet deeper
than the proposed design and therefore are not expected to interfere with construction. In some areas,

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 3 October 2020
the bedrock has been incorporated into the design. Venable Creek Reach 4 is bedrock controlled and
thus vertically stable.
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Surry County. Project area soils are
described below in Table 3. Figure 5 provides a soil map of the Site.
Table 3: Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
BbC- Braddock
fine sandy
loam
This series consists of very deep well drained soils on stream terraces, fans, and fan remnants.
Available water capacity is moderate to high and shrink-swell potential is moderate. The
profile consists of a brown fine sandy loam surface layer and a yellowish red clay subsoil layer.
CsA – Colvard
and Suches
soils
This series consists of very deep well drained soils typically found on floodplains. Available
water capacity is high for Colvard class soils and moderately high for Suches class soils. Shrink-
swell potential is low. The surface layer consists of dark yellowish brown fine sandy loam
(Colvard) and brown loam (Suches). The subsoil consists of brown clay loam to dark yellowish-
brown loam.
DeF –
Devotion-
Rhodhiss-
Bannertown
complex
This series consist of moderately deep to very deep soils that are somewhat excessively
drained to well drained soils located on ridges and low hills. Shrink-swell potential is low and
available water capacity is very low (Devotion and Bannertown) and moderate or high
(Rhodhiss). Devotion series consists of a dark yellowish brown gravelly fine sandy loam surface
layer and a brown gravelly fine sandy loam subsoil layer. Rhodhiss consists of a partially
decomposed leaf litter and root mat with brown gravelly fine sandy loam surface layer and a
brown loam to red loam subsoil layer. Bannertown consists of a dark brown gravelly fine sandy
loam surface layer and a brown gravelly fine sandy loam to light yellowish brown gravelly fine
sandy loam subsoil layer.
WfC2 –
Woolwine-
Fairview-
Westfield
complex
This series consists of moderately deep to very deep well drained soils typically found on
interfluves, crests, side slopes, head slopes, and nose slopes. Shrink-swell potential is low and
available water capacity is very low or low (Woolwine), moderate or high (Fairview), low or
moderate (Westfield). Woolwine consists of a strong brown gravelly loam surface layer and a
yellowish red clay to red gravelly clay subsoils layer. Fairview consists of a dark brown gravelly
fine sandy loam surface layer, brown fine sandy loam subsurface layer, and a yellowish red
sandy clay loam to red clay loam subsoil layer. Westfield consists of a dark brown gravelly fine
sandy loam surface layer, brown fine sandy loam subsurface layer, and a yellowish red clay
loam to red gravelly sandy clay loam subsoil layer.
WoD/WoE –
Woolwine-
Fairview-
Westfield
complex
This series consists of moderately deep to very deep well drained soils on ridges and low hills.
Shrink-swell potential is low and available water capacity is very low or low (Woolwine),
moderate or high (Fairview), low or moderate (Westfield). Same soil profile as WfC2.
Source: Soil Survey of Surry County, North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx
3.1.2 Watershed
The project begins at the intersection of Little Mountain Church Road and Venable Creek. The
watersheds for UT3, UT4, and UT6 are roughly bound by Venable Farm Road to the west. All of the reach
watersheds are encompassed by Venable Creek watershed, which extends south past Little Mountain
Church Road. The Site is typically defined by forested and agricultural land use with sporadic
development of rural homes. Wildlands conducted a watershed survey on March 31, 2020, to verify land
uses observed in recent aerial photography and to gain an understanding of the various sources of
sediment to Site streams.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 4 October 2020
Venable Creek’s watershed is predominantly wooded in the headwaters, with one pasture present just
upstream of Little Mountain Church Road. Venable Creek’s banks are eroded within the pasture, which
provides a fine sediment source to the project. UT1’s watershed is predominantly forested on the
hillslopes while the more gently sloped areas are in row crop production. UT1 is impounded
downstream of the row crops, and this impoundment likely functions as a sediment sink for the
watershed. Downstream of the impoundments, UT1 and its tributary flow through forest and pasture.
Eroded sediments from stream banks are a minor sediment source to UT1. UT3, UT4, and UT6 all have
eroded rills from nearby pastures contributing fine sediments at the inception point of the streams.
Finally, an eroding farm road which enters the Venable Creek floodplain between UT4 and UT6 is a fine
sediment source to Venable Creek.
3.2 Land Use/Land Cover
Land use and land cover, both past and present, were investigated throughout the Site and its
watershed using historical aerials from 1950-2014 and through the March 31, 2020, watershed
reconnaissance survey. Future land use potential was examined by reviewing the Surry County zoning
boundaries and the Surry County Land Use Plan 2040 (Surry County Planning Board, 2019).
A review of historic aerials from 1950 to 2014 shows that onsite streams have existed in their
approximate location for over 60 years, and that the agricultural management of the land has remained
consistent as well. Historic aerial photos are provided for review in Appendix 1.
The Surry County Land Use Plan indicates that no population growth is anticipated in the county over
the next two decades. The land within the watershed is zoned rural and remains rural in the future land
use maps.
3.3 Existing Vegetation
UT1 and Venable Creek Reach 1 consist of narrow rows of woody vegetation including tag alder (Alnus
serrulata) and white pine (Pinus strobus). The herbaceous pasture area is dominated by grasses (Festuca
spp., Pemmosetum spp.), blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis), wood nettle (Solanum viarum), and
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). At the beginning of Venable Creek Reach 2, the area becomes more
forested with the canopy species including sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), American beech (Fagus
grandifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii), red oak (Quercus
rubra), and white oak (Quercus alba). In addition, mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) is found along the
right bank steep bluff slopes. Throughout this reach, areas of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and
multiflora rose were observed along both banks.
UT2 and UT2A’s vegetation consists of mature canopy dominated by American beech, red maple,
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), red oak, and white oak. UT2A and UT2 are located within a forested
pasture where cattle have access. UT3’s buffer consists of American holly (Ilex opaca), Virginia pine
(Pinus virginiana), persimmon (Diospyros virgiana), and black walnut (Juglans nigra). Multiflora rose and
Chinese privet are common along the stream banks in the understory throughout the tributary. UT4 is
located within a forested pasture and includes American beech, red oak, and American holly with
Chinese privet along the stream banks. UT5’s vegetation consists of a mature forest dominated by
American holly, ironwood, black walnut, swamp chestnut oak, red oak, and white oak with Christmas
fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) as groundcover. UT6’s buffer consists of American holly, American
beech, black walnut, and invasive species including Chinese privet, multiflora rose, and Tree of heaven
(Ailanthus altissima).

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 5 October 2020
3.4 Project Resources
Wildlands investigated on-site jurisdictional waters of the United States (US) within the proposed
project area. Potential jurisdictional areas were delineated using the US Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Routine On-Site Determination Method. This method is defined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the subsequent Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Regional
Supplement. Streams were classified using North Carolina Department of Water Resources (NCDWR)
Classification Forms. Jurisdictional waters of the US were surveyed for inclusion on plans and figures.
NCDWR stream identification forms are in Appendix 3. Tables 4 and 5 provide a summary of water
resources within the project. Existing conditions and cross section locations are illustrated in Figure 2.
Reach specific cross sections and geomorphic summaries are provided in Appendix 4.
Venable Creek
Venable Creek Reach 1 enters the Site from a 42” culvert under Little Mountain Church Road.
Immediately downstream of the culvert, Venable Creek Reach 1 flows through the center of the
moderately confined valley and has low but eroding banks due to cattle impacts. This reach is 100 LF
long, and Reach 2 begins upstream of the UT1 confluence where Venable Creek starts to incise and the
valley widens. Reach 2 has eroded down to bedrock and is laterally unstable with eroding stream banks.
Reach 3 begins immediately after Venable Creek flows under an overhead power line. Reach 3 flows
along the left valley wall despite a wide, alluvial right floodplain and exhibits widespread bank erosion
and sections of incision. An eroding dirt farm road along the top of the steep left bank contributes
sediment to Venable Creek. Downstream of the UT2 confluence, the left floodplain widens and the right
floodplain narrows. Cattle have access to the stream from the right side, causing low, trampled banks.
Venable Creek Reaches 1, 2, and 3 are characterized by a single row of trees along the top of banks with
pasture beyond, several instances of exposed and undercut roots, and extensive cattle impacts. These
reaches have minimal pattern and may have been
straightened to maximize farm fields in the past.
Venable Creek Reach 4 begins downstream of the UT3
confluence. Reach 4’s valley is narrow and the stream
flows against the hillside on the right side of the valley
for most of the reach. The entire stream corridor is
wooded, except for an open pasture in the left floodplain
near the confluence with UT6. For approximately 600
feet downstream of UT3, the left top of bank is fenced,
and the right floodplain is a steep hillside. There is a trail
on the right hillside that is used to move cattle between
pastures and cattle do not access the stream here. Cattle
impacts are more frequent downstream of this 600-foot
long section of Reach 4 and include several in-stream
wallow areas. Although the bed is fairly stable due to
numerous bedrock outcrops and cobble substrate, one or
both banks are eroded or scoured along most of the
reach. Reach 4 has more sinuosity than the upstream
reaches of Venable Creek and has developed point bars
on several meander bends. The valley pinches several
times throughout the reach, including at the old mill near
the downstream end of the project.
Venable Creek – Reach 3: Steep left bank
and trampled right bank
Venable Creek - Reach 4: Bank scour and
bedrock outrcrop

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 6 October 2020
Cross section surveys were conducted on Venable Creek Reaches 2 and 3. Reach 2 is most like an
incised, straightened E4 with a bank height ratio of 1.6 and Reach 3 is most like an incised, straightened
E/C4 with a bank height ratio of 1.3 to 1.6.
UT1
UT1 flows into the Site from a 6-ft X 7-ft concrete box culvert under Siloam Road. UT1 flows for
approximately 180 feet before connecting to Venable Creek. The valley is wide and flat and consists of
scrub brush and herbaceous vegetation. Cattle have full access to UT1 and have trampled the left bank
for most of the reach. The reach is relatively straight and lacks bedform diversity. Bed material consists
of a cobble and large gravel mixture.
A cross sectional survey of UT1 classified the channel as an incised E4b with a bank height ratio of 1.4.
UT2 and UT2A
UT2 Reach 1 originates as an intermittent stream at a
headcut and flows through a confined, wooded valley over
a series of steps and cobble riffles. UT2 transitions to a
perennial channel after 15 LF. UT2A is a perennial channel
that originates offsite and, similar to UT2 Reach 1, flows
through a confined, wooded valley over steps and cobble
riffles. Areas of bank erosion and scour are present on
both streams where the channel flows along the hillside.
There is minimal cattle impact on these steeper reaches.
UT2 Reach 1’s valley widens and flattens and a wetland
has formed in the right floodplain as UT2 Reach 1
approaches the UT2A confluence.
UT2 Reach 2 begins at the UT2A confluence. Cattle impacts are extensive on Reach 2. Trampling has
diverted stream flow away from the relic UT2 stream channel. A channel has formed to the north of the
relic channel and flows along the base of an old barn. Historic aerials support the location of the
observed relic channel. The existing channel has trampled, eroding banks. There is no bedform diversity
and bed substrate consists of mud. Near the confluence with Venable Creek, the defined channel
disappears and splays out into a soft, muddy depression. Reach 2’s buffer is primarily herbaceous; no
woody species are present. A cross sectional survey of UT2 Reach 2 classified the channel as a low
sinuosity C4b.
UT2B
UT2B originates upstream of the project area within a confined valley. UT2B becomes perennial within
the confined valley. Where UT2B enters the floodplain of Venable Creek, it transitions underground.
UT2B is visible within a few sinkholes in the Venable Creek
floodplain.
UT3
UT3 Reach 1 begins at two hillside seeps on the western
side of the Site that is also a cattle wallow area. Channel
definition strengthens downstream of the wallow area.
Cattle impact has caused erosion along the left bank for
the majority of the reach but the stream bed is stabilized
by multiple bedrock outcrops and cobble substrate. UT3 is
relatively straight until it reaches the pasture adjacent to
Venable Creek which marks the transition from Reach 1 to
Reach 2. Reach 2 flows north along the woodline until the
UT3
UT2

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 7 October 2020
confluence with Venable Creek. The buffer consists of sparse trees and scrubby vegetation. The right
buffer along this lower section consists of a single row of trees. A cross sectional survey of UT3 Reach 2
classified the channel as an incised, low sinuosity E4b with a bank height ratio of 1.5.
UT4
Similar to UT3, UT4 begins as a seep within a cattle wallow area and flows through a confined wooded
valley. Cattle impact along the entire UT4 reach is substantial, both within the channel and in the left
floodplain. Degradation has resulted in several isolated areas of incision along UT4, but the stream is no
longer incising and is vertically stable. The eroding banks and cattle paths to the creek are contributing a
large volume of sediment to UT4 and Venable Creek.
UT5
UT5 is an intermittent channel that originates upstream of the easement within a narrow, wooded
valley. The stream transitions to perennial 105 LF into the easement. Bed degradation has led to incision
along the entire upstream section of the stream channel, but the stream is not eroded. As the channel
reaches the flatter Venable Creek floodplain, it flows into a cattle wallow area. Cattle impact has
diverted water away from the natural channel to form a new flow path. The relic channel is still intact
and connects to Venable Creek. The bed material consists of a mixture of cobble and large gravel.
UT6
UT6 Reach 1 begins as a perennial channel at a hillside seep
adjacent to a pasture on the northwestern side of the Site. The
stream start is within a 100-foot wide powerline easement.
The buffer is thick with brush and there are isolated sections of
bank erosion and incision around bedrock knickpoints. UT6
Reach 2 begins just upstream of where a cattle crossing has
diverted the flow away from the natural channel. Baseflow
now follows the eroding cattle path, splays out into the
floodplain of Venable Creek, and eventually flows into Venable
Creek through a ditch. A cross sectional survey of the now
abandoned UT6 Reach 2 classified the channel as an A4.

UT6 Reach 2 – cattle trail

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 8 October 2020
Table 4: Project Attribute Table Part 3
Parameter
Reach
Length
(lf)
Valley
Confinement
(confined,
moderately
confined,
unconfined)
Drainage
Area
(acres)
Perennial,
Intermittent
(Int)
NCDWR
Water
Quality
Class.
Stream
Classification1 Evolutionary
Trend
(Simon)1
FEMA
Ex. Prop.
Venable Creek
Reach 1
3823
Moderately
confined
183
Perennial
Class C
N/A N/A N/A
None
Venable Creek
Reach 2 519 E4 B4 III
Venable Creek
Reach 3 Unconfined 599 E/C4 C4 IV
Venable Creek
Reach 4 Confined 705 N/A N/A N/A
UT1 179 Unconfined 334 Perennial E4b C4b III
UT2 Reach 1 1154 Confined 21 Int.(15 LF)
Perennial
N/A N/A N/A
UT2 Reach 2 Unconfined 43 C4b B4 IV->V
UT2A 889 Confined 21 Perennial N/A N/A N/A
UT2B 34 Unconfined 9 Perennial N/A N/A N/A
UT3 Reach 1
1236
Confined 15
Perennial
N/A N/A N/A
UT3 Reach 2 Confined to
Unconfined 18 E4b C4b III
UT4 446 Confined 9 Perennial N/A N/A N/A
UT5 552 Confined 12 Int.(105 LF)
Pernnial N/A N/A N/A
UT6 Reach 1 588 Confined 8 Perennial N/A N/A N/A
UT6 Reach 2 10 A4 A4 III
1. The Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1994) and Simon Channel Evolution Model (Simon, 1989) is for natural streams.
These channels have been heavily manipulated by man and therefore may not fit the classification category or channel
evolution as described by these models. Results of the classification and model are provided for illustrative purposes only.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 9 October 2020
4.0 Functional Uplift Potential
The potential for functional uplift is qualitatively described in this section using terminology from the
Stream Functions Pyramid (Harman, 2012). The Stream Functions Pyramid describes a hierarchy of five
stream functions, each of which supports the functions above it on the pyramid (and sometimes
reinforces those below it). The five functions in order from bottom to top are hydrology, hydraulics,
geomorphology, physicochemical, and biology. Neither the Stream Functions Pyramid nor the
Quantification Tool are proposed to determine success of the mitigation site.
4.1 Hydrology
The Site is maintained as grazed pasture and woods, and portions of the Site watersheds have been
managed for row crops and pasture. These alterations in land cover typically result in reductions in
rainfall interception and evapotranspiration which lead to increases in runoff and water yield (Dunne
and Leopold, 1978) when compared to forests. The primary result of these changes is an increase in
both peak flows and base flows. Increases in water yield usually change over time if vegetation is
allowed to regrow, but these watersheds have had relatively consistent land use since 1950.
The Site watersheds has a low percentage of contributing impervious area and low potential for urban
growth. Watershed land use directly adjacent to the stream will be shifted from agriculture to forest as
part of the project. Additionally, five points with potential to concentrate agricultural input will be
treated with BMPs, resulting in a lift to hydrologic function of Site streams after development of the
project.
4.2 Hydraulics
Site streams slated for restoration are hydraulically impaired due to lack of consistent floodplain
connection, apart from UT2 Reach 2. The streams are affected by incision with bank height ratios
ranging from 1.3 to 2.6. Reconnecting the streams to a floodplain using Priority 1 and Priority 2
restoration will provide the in-stream relief needed to improve the hydraulic function of the Site
streams. Bankfull and greater flow velocities and channel shear stresses will be reduced. UT2 Reach 2’s
flow is currently spread into multiple cattle path channels due to intensive cattle activity. Cattle will be
excluded from this area, the valley topography will be restored, and UT2 Reach 2 will be reconstructed
with depth and plan form appropriate for the restored valley.
4.3 Channel Geomorphology
The past incision and on-going bank erosion related to livestock access place most Site streams slated
for restoration in Stages III and IV of the Simon Channel Evolution Model. Approximately 60% of the Site
stream banks slated for restoration are actively eroding, and cattle access 100% of those streams. The
bedform diversity is moderate, with pool to pool spacing ratio ranging from 1.9 to 11.6, and the
streambed is estimated to consist of 50% riffles. Overall, the existing geomorphologic function on these
streams ranges from moderate in areas where bedform diversity has formed despite incision and direct
cattle access, to very poor in direct cattle wallow areas.
There is opportunity to improve the geomorphologic function on the Site. Incision and bank erosion will
be corrected. Active headcuts will be stabilized with step structures. Large woody debris (LWD) will be
added to the system through construction of instream structures and bank revetments. A riparian buffer
will be planted, resulting in improved long-term geomorphic function of the Site streams.
4.4 Physicochemical
No water quality sampling has been conducted on Site streams and there are no water quality
monitoring stations within the watershed; however, the 2009 Upper Yadkin RBRP turbidity as an issue

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 10 October 2020
and has a goal of restoring impaired stream’s water quality by limiting sediment, nutrients, and fecal
coliform inputs.
All Site streams are accessed by cattle which are a direct source for fecal coliform to the streams. Bank
erosion and pasture runoff contributes sediment and nutrients to the streams. As a result of these
persistent and on-going threats, there is great potential to improve the physicochemical functioning of
the Site streams and their watershed through execution of the project. Beyond the proposed stream
activities, BMPs will be installed at four points of concentrated agricultural input to reduce nutrients and
sediment which may runoff from the adjacent pastures. A riparian buffer will be established and the
pasture within the conservation easement will be taken out of production, thus reducing nutrient-laden
runoff and erosion of nutrient-rich bank sediments.
Water will flow over instream structures that will provide aeration. Trees will be planted in the riparian
zone to eventually shade and cool stream flow and help reduce and filter runoff. The stream will be
reconnected to its floodplain and adjacent riparian wetlands to provide storage and treatment of
overbank flows. Streambank erosion will be reduced to nearly eliminate a source of sediment and
nutrients. However, the potential improvements to physicochemical functioning on Site streams will not
happen immediately and some aspects will not occur until a mature canopy is established. Therefore,
physicochemical improvements will not be explicitly monitored for success, although visual observations
should show that the improvements are in place and functioning.
4.5 Biology
There are no available biological data for the Site; however, the habitat conditions on the Site vary from
poor in areas that are actively incising and heavily accessed by cattle to good in the upper enhancement
reaches that exhibit more stable bedforms and are less frequently accessed by cattle. The wooded
portions of the riparian buffers provide some permanent habitat, but the pastures in the floodplain of
the project provide little habitat value for terrestrial species.
There is opportunity to improve the instream and riparian habitat. Instream structures with a variety of
rock and woody materials, pools of varying depths, and woody bank revetments will be added to the
Site streams to increase instream habitat diversity, and a wide riparian buffer that will shade the stream
and improve terrestrial habitat will be planted. UT2 Reach 2 will be restored to a single thread channel
with a diverse bedform. Although the biological response of the project will not be explicitly monitored,
improvements in biologic activity of the Site will likely be noted during visual assessments of the project.
4.6 Overall Functional Uplift Potential
Overall, the Site has good functional uplift potential, including slight improvements in watershed
hydrology, the improvements in stream hydraulics that will be seen throughout the Site with the stream
restoration and BMP installations, and improvements in geomorphology that will come with restoring
streams that are suited to the valley types throughout the Site. Physicochemical and biological
improvements will result from the project as well.
4.7 Site Constraints to Functional Uplift
There are no known Site constraints that will affect the functional uplift of the project. The valley width
on the Site will allow for the development of appropriate pattern and dimensions to restore stable,
functioning streams and wetlands. The degree to which the physicochemical and biology functions can
improve on the Site is limited by the watershed conditions beyond the project limits, upstream water
quality, and the presence of source communities upstream and downstream of the Site.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 11 October 2020
5.0 Regulatory Considerations
Table 5, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site. These considerations are
expanded upon in Sections 5.1-5.3.
Table 5: Project Attribute Table Part 4
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes No PCN1
Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes No PCN1
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix 5
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
1. PJD submitted to USACE on 5/1/2020 and 6/18/20. See Appendix 2 for email correspondence with USACE. PCN to be
provided to NCIRT with Final Mitigation Plan.
5.1 Biological and Cultural Resources
A Categorical Exclusion for the Site was approved on November 2, 2018. This document included
investigation into the presence of threatened and endangered species on Site protected under The
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as well as any historical resources protected under The National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966. The biological conclusion for the Site, per the Categorical Exclusion
research and response by US Fish and Wildlife Service, is that “any incidental take that may results from
the associated activities [from the project] is exempt under the 4(d) rule.” The conclusion for cultural
resources per the Categorical Exclusion research and response by the State Historic Preservation Office
is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by this project. The signed Categorical
Exclusion checklist and summary are provided in Appendix 5. A complete copy of the Categorical
Exclusion document, including additional information and regulatory communications, is available upon
request.
5.2 FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
The Site is represented on the Surry County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 5927, with an effective
date of August 18, 2009. The entire Site is outside of a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) regulatory
floodplain. Surry County does not require a floodplain development permit for projects outside of the
SFHA.
The proposed design associated with the Site has limited or no risk of potential hydrologic trespass since
the project encompasses predominantly steep, zero order or first order streams. Venable Creek and UT1
are the only streams with risk for backwater effects. Venable Creek Reach 1 is enhancement II with no
instream work proposed, and the first 200 feet of Reach 2 is enhancement I at grade, reducing the risk
of offsite backwater effects. UT1 is a Priority 2 restoration for its length, which increases floodplain
capacity with limited backwater potential.
5.3 401/404
Some wetlands within the floodplain adjacent to the existing streams will be partially impacted during
realignment of the stream channel. Wetlands on the Site that are within the conservation easement and
outside of the limits of disturbance will be flagged with safety fence during construction to prevent
unintended impacts. This will be denoted in the final construction plans. The Pre-Construction
Notification, including this data, will be submitted to the NCIRT with the Final Mitigation Plan.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 12 October 2020
6.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The major goals of the proposed stream mitigation project are to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Yadkin River Basin while creating a functional riparian corridor at the site level.
Project goals are desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement and/or visual
assessment. Objectives are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals. The project will be
monitored after construction to evaluate performance as described in Sections 8 and 9 of this report.
The project goals and related objectives are described in Table 6.
Table 6: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal Objective CU-Wide and RBRP Objectives
Supported
Function
Supported
Exclude livestock
from stream
channels.
Install livestock fencing on all or portions
of the Site and/or permanently remove
livestock from all or portions of the Site to
exclude livestock from stream channels
and riparian areas.
Reduce nutrient, sediment, and
fecal coliform inputs; Protect
restored aquatic habitat;
Implement agricultural BMPs
(permanent livestock exclusion).
Hydraulic,
Geomorphology,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Improve the
stability of stream
channels.
Reconstruct stream channels slated for
restoration with stable dimensions and
appropriate depth relative to the existing
floodplain. Add bank revetments and in-
stream structures to protect restored/
enhanced streams.
Reduce sediment and nutrient
inputs; restore aquatic habitat.
Hydraulic,
Geomorphology,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Improve instream
habitat.
Install habitat features such as
constructed steps, cover logs, and brush
toes on restored reaches. Add woody
materials to channel beds. Construct pools
of varying depth.
Restore degraded aquatic
habitat.
Geomorphology,
Biology
Restore and
enhance native
floodplain
vegetation.
Convert active cattle pasture to forested
riparian buffers along all Site streams,
which will slow and treat runoff from
adjacent pasture before entering streams.
Protect and enhance existing forested
riparian buffers. Treat invasive species.
Reduce nutrient, sediment, and
fecal coliform inputs.
Hydrology,
Hydraulic,
Geomorphology,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Treat concentrated
agricultural runoff
Install agricultural BMPs in areas of
concentrated agricultural runoff to treat
runoff before it enters the stream
channel.
Reduce nutrient, sediment, and
fecal coliform inputs.
Hydrology,
Hydraulic,
Geomorphology,
Physicochemical,
Biology
Permanently
protect the project
site from harmful
uses.
Establish a conservation easement on the
Site. Exclude livestock from Site streams.
Protect aquatic habitat; Protect
water supply waters; Reduce
nutrient, sediment, and fecal
coliform inputs; Implement
agricultural BMPs (permanent
livestock exclusion).
Hydrology
(local),
Hydraulic,
Geomorphology,
Physicochemical,
Biology

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 13 October 2020
7.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
7.1 Design Approach Overview
The design approach for this Site was developed to meet the goals and objectives described in Section 6
which were formulated based on the potential for uplift described in Section 4. The design is also
intended to provide the expected outcomes in Section 6, though these are not tied to performance
criteria. The project streams proposed for restoration on the Site will be reconnected with an active
floodplain and the channels will be reconstructed with stable dimension, pattern, and profile that will
transport the water and sediment delivered to the system. Cattle will be excluded from the riparian
zone and the entire project area will be protected in perpetuity by a conservation easement.
The design approach for this Site utilized a combination of analog and analytical approaches for stream
restoration, and also relies on empirical data and prior experiences and observations. Reference reaches
were identified to serve as the basis for design parameters. Channels were sized based on design
discharge hydrologic analysis which uses a combination of empirical and analytical data as described
within this report. Designs were then verified and/or modified based on sediment transport analysis.
These design approaches have been used on many successful Mountain and Piedmont restoration
projects and is appropriate for the goals and objectives for this Site.
7.2 Reference Streams
Reference streams provide geomorphic parameters of a stable system, which can be used to inform
design of stable channels of similar stream types in similar landscapes and watersheds. Eight reference
reaches were identified for this Site and used to support the design of streams (Figure 6). These
reference reaches were chosen because of their similarities to the Site streams including drainage area,
valley slope, morphology, and bed material. Due to the variety of slopes and project stream types
present on the Site, the distribution of reference reaches is wide, throughout North Carolina’s foothills
and western Piedmont. Geomorphic parameters for these reference reaches are summarized in
Appendix 4. The references to be used for the specific streams are shown in Table 7. A description of
each reference reach is included below.
Table 7: Stream Reference Data Used in Development of Design Parameters
Design Stream Venable Creek UT1 UT2 UT3 UT6
Reach 2 3 2 2 2
Reference Stream Stream Type B4 C4 C4b B4 C4b A4
Ironwood Tributary A5a+ x
Timber Tributary B4 x x x
UT to South Fork Fishing Creek B5a x
Riverbend Park C4 x x x
UT to Gap Branch B4a/A4 x
Agony Acres UT1 Reach 3 B4 x x
UT to Rocky Creek E4b x x x x
Box Creek C4 x
7.2.1 Critcher Brothers Reference Streams
The following streams are in Wilkes County at Wildlands’ Critcher Brothers Mitigation Site. The
landscape of this project is similar to the Site and supports a variety of stream types from B streams to
high sloped Aa+ step pool channels.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 14 October 2020
Ironwood Tributary Reference Reach
Ironwood Tributary reference reach is geomorphically described as a steep (11.4%) step-like system and
classifies as an A5a+ channel. It has a drainage area of 0.03 square miles and is surrounded by heavy
canopy coverage. It has a channel sinuosity of 1.19 which is considerably high for high gradient systems.
Several long gravel/cobble riffles were observed that cascaded into pools over root mass, woody debris,
or a boulder step at the tail of riffle.
Timber Tributary Reference Reach
Timber Tributary Reference Reach is a 200 ft B4 channel with a drainage area of approximately 0.04
square miles. The stream meanders through a confined valley surrounded by mature trees. The channel
has a moderate slope of 3.2%, and a channel sinuosity of 1.12. This system supports varied habitats
including woody debris, rock riffles and meander pools.
UT to SF Fishing Creek Reference Reach
UT to SF Fishing Creek reference reach is a small, steep (8.2%) B5a channel. It has a drainage area of
approximately 0.02 square miles. UT to SF Fishing Creek is surrounded by a forested land cover and is
located at the downstream-most end of the project site. The bedform consists of bedrock slides and
boulder step-pool cascades located at the tail of riffle features. The channel is confined so the banks are
relatively high but host a variety of mature vegetation.
7.2.2 Riverbend Park
Riverbend Park is located in Catawba County, NC and receives drainage from a predominantly forested
watershed. The surveyed portion of the reach has a slope of 1.3% with a moderate sinuosity and quality
bedform. This reach has a drainage area of 0.1 square miles and is classified as a Rosgen C4 stream. The
reach had an entrenchment ratio of 1.6, width to depth ratio of 11.8, and a bank height ratio of 1.2.
7.2.3 UT to Gap Branch
UT to Gap Branch is located in the Box Creek Wilderness near Union Mills, NC. This stream flows
through a confined valley with an alluvial bottom. The overall stream slope is 6.8% and the width to
depth ratio is 10.1. The entrenchment ratio is 3.4, and the reach classifies as a slightly entrenched B4a.
7.2.4 Agony Acres UT1 Reach 3
Reach 3 of UT1 on the Agony Acres Mitigation Site in Guilford County was selected as a reference reach
due to its similarity in slope and drainage area to the restoration reaches on the project. UT1 – Reach 3
has a drainage area of 0.3 square miles and classified as an B4 stream type.
7.2.5 UT to Rocky Creek
The UT to Rocky Creek reference site is in central Montgomery County within the Uwharrie National
Forest. The drainage area is 1.10 square miles and the land use within the drainage area is a semi-
mature forest. The UT to Rocky Creek Reference site was classified as an E4b stream type with a low
sinuosity (1.1). The channel has a width to depth ratio of 9.1 and an entrenchment ratio of 6. The reach
has a valley slope of 2.6% while the channel slope is 2.4%. The bed material d50 for the reach is 22.6
mm. Due to the low sinuosity, no pattern data were collected.
7.2.6 Box Creek
The Box Creek reference reach site is in Rutherford County and has a drainage area of 2.13 square miles.
The entire watershed is forested and the reference reach site is located approximately a quarter mile
upstream from a large pond. The reach is characterized by short riffles, deep pools, and long shallow
runs. This moderately sinuous reach (1.3) classifies as a C4 channel and has a high width/depth ratio of
19.1. This reach reported a bank height ratio of 1.5 but banks were typically stable due to a large extent
of woody vegetation lining each bank, especially along the outer bends of a few tight meanders. In-

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 15 October 2020
stream habitat structures included undercut banks, woody debris, and coarse substrate from which fish
have built several gravel piles for nesting.
7.3 Design Discharge Analysis
Multiple methods were used to develop bankfull discharge estimates for each of the project restoration
reaches. These are discussed below. Figure 7 shows the relationship of the data to the design discharge
estimates.
7.3.1 Regional Curve Data
Discharge was estimated using the published NC Mountain Curve (Figure 7) as well as the updated curve
for rural Piedmont and Mountain streams, shown as the Alan Walker Curve.
7.3.2 Regional Flood Frequency Analysis
A regional flood frequency analysis was performed by using 26 USGS gages in the North Carolina
Piedmont including five gages with drainage areas smaller than 1 square mile. The Hosking and Walls
(1995) homogeneity test was performed using statistical software R© to identify the most appropriate
gages for use in the analysis. Flood frequency regression curves were developed to calculate discharges
for ungaged streams in the North Carolina Piedmont for the 1.2-year and 1.5-year recurrence intervals.
7.3.3 Site Specific Reference Reach Curve
Eight reference reaches were identified for this project. Each reference reach was surveyed to develop
information for analyzing drainage area-discharge relationships as well as development of design
parameters. Stable cross-sectional dimensions and channel slopes were used to compute a bankfull
discharge with the Manning’s equation for each reference reach. The resulting discharge values were
plotted with drainage area on Figure 7 (Reference Reach Curve) and compared the other discharge
estimation methods.
7.3.4 Maximum Discharge (Manning’s Equation)
A riffle cross-section was surveyed on each design reach on the Site. Due to the existing impairments
throughout Site streams, bankfull indicators were weak and not considered reliable for estimating a
bankfull discharge. Instead, Manning’s equation was used to calculate a discharge associated with the
top of banks for all project streams. Stream slope was calculated from the surveyed channel slope, and
roughness was estimated using guidelines from Chow (1959). This corresponding discharge was plotted
on Figure 7 (Qmax – Existing Site Streams) and considered as an upper limit for potential bankfull
discharge values throughout the Site except for UT2 Reach 2. UT2 Reach 2’s flow is split due to cattle
trampling and the bankfull cross section surveyed only carrys a portion of the watershed flow.
7.3.5 Wildlands Regional USGS Rural Calculator
Wildlands developed a regional flood frequency analysis tool that tailored the USGS 2009 publication
Magnitude and Frequency of Rural Floods in the Southeastern United States, through 2006 to the
Piedmont of North Carolina. Of the 103 stations referenced in the publication, 23 were used in the
development of the tool. To fill gaps in data, five additional stations were added by Wildlands to
represent streams with drainage areas less than one square mile. The Hosking and Wallis homogeneity
test was performed in R© to identify the most appropriate gages based on homogeneity (Hosking and
Wallis, 1993). The gages used were:

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 16 October 2020
• USGS 02096740 – Gun Branch near Alamance, NC (DA = 4.06 mi2)
• USGS 02096846 – Cane Creek near Yadkin Grove, NC (DA = 7.54 mi2)
• USGS 02097010 – Robeson Creek near Pittsboro, NC (DA = 1.71 mi2)
• USGS 02101030 – Falls Creek near Bennett, NC (DA = 3.43 mi2)
• USGS 0210166029 – Rocky River at SR1300 near Crutchfield Crossroads, NC (DA = 7.42 mi2)
The data from these 28 gage stations were used to develop flood frequency curves for the 1.2-year and
1.5-year recurrence interval discharges. These relationships can be used to estimate discharge of those
recurrence intervals for ungaged streams in the same hydrologic region and were solved for each
project reach’s discharge with the drainage area as the input. The discharge estimates are shown on
Figure 7 as the Regional Flood Frequency storms.
7.3.6 Design Discharge Analysis Summary
The design discharge analysis began with a review of the Site streams’ maximum discharges. These
points were outside the scatter of all other curves and datasets for all streams except UT2 Reach 2 and
were thus removed from consideration due to the unstable nature of the cross-sections. UT2 Reach 2’s
existing cross section does not receive all of the watershed flow due to multiple flowpaths through
cattle trampled areas, so the maximum discharge is low. Review of the regional curve, the reference
reach curve, and the 1.2-year and 1.5-year flood frequency relationships revealed that the NC Mountain
Curve slope and intercept are similar to that of the reference reach curve, while the Alan Walker Curve
intercept is similar to the 1.2-year predictions. These curves were then used to set the upper and lower
boundaries, respectively, for the selected Site design discharges. Design discharges for were selected
within the scatter of the reference reach curve and between the 1.2-year and 1.5-year predictions for all
streams except UT2 Reach 2. UT2 Reach 2 exists a steep valley and flows through a wetland developed
within the alluvial fan sediments. UT2 Reach 2’s design discharge was intentionally set lower, in line with
the 1.2-year prediction, to promote frequent stream-floodplain interaction and further development of
the stream-wetland complex.
The design discharge selections support the design goal of reducing instream stress by promoting
frequent dispersal and infiltration of flood flows onto floodplains while maintaining small channel
constructability. Table 8 gives a summary of the discharge analysis, while Figure 7 illustrates the design
discharge data.
Table 8: Summary of Design Discharge Analysis for Restoration Reaches
Venable Creek UT1 UT2 UT3 UT6 Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 2 Reach 2 Reach 2
DA (acres) 519 599 334 43 18 10
DA (sq. mi.) 0.81 0.94 0.52 0.07 0.03 0.02
NC Mountain Regional Curve (cfs) 86 98 61 13 7 4
Alan Walker Curve (cfs) 47 54 33 7 3 2
Wildlands Regional
USGS Flood Frequency
Analysis (cfs)
1.2-year 67 76 48 11 6 4
1.5-year 95 107 69 16 8 5
Site Specific Reference Reach Curve 69 75 55 19 12 9
Max Q from Manning's Eq. from XS
survey (cfs) 247 256 125 4 51 79
Final Design Q (cfs) 75 83 52 10 6 4

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 17 October 2020
7.4 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Reference reaches were a primary source of information to develop the pattern and profile design
parameters for the streams. Ranges of pattern parameters were developed within the reference reach
parameter ranges with some exceptions based on best professional judgement and knowledge from
previous projects. For example, for meandering C designs, radius of curvature ratio is kept above 1.8 on
all reaches and meander width ratio is kept above a 2.4. Meandering designs have pool widths to be 1.2
to 1.5 times the width of riffles to provide adequate point bars and riffle pool transition zones.
Wildlands has found these minimum ratios to support stable geometry. Designer experience was used
for pool design as well. Pool depths were designed to be a minimum of 3 times deeper than riffles to
provide habitat variation. Cross-section parameters such as area, depth, and width were designed based
on the design discharge and stable bank slopes. In some cases, the width to depth ratio was increased
beyond reference parameters as dictated by prior project experience to provide stable bank slopes prior
to the development of a fully vegetated streambank. Key morphological parameters for the Site are
listed in Tables 9-12. Complete morphological tables for existing, reference, and proposed conditions are
in Appendix 4.
Table 9: Summary of Morphological Parameters for Venable Creek
Parameter
Venable Creek Reach 2 Venable Creek Reach 3
Existing
References
Proposed Existing
References
Proposed Agony
Acres UT1
Reach 3
UT to
Rocky
Creek
Riverbend
Park
UT to
Rocky
Creek
Box
Creek
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres) 519 96 672 519 599 166 672 1363 599
Channel/Reach Classification E4 B4 E4b B4 E/C4 C4 E4b C4 C4
Design Discharge Width (ft) 10.6 11.1 12.2 15.0 10.5 –
10.8 10.6 12.2 23.5 15.6
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.5 0.7 1.3 1.1 1.6-
1.7 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.1
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 15.6 7.4 16.3 16.4 16.9-
18.1 9.5 16.3 28.9 17.3
Design Discharge Velocity
(ft/s) 4.8 4.9 5.5 4.6 4.9 3.5 5.5 3.3 4.8
Design Discharge (cfs) 75 37 85 75 83 33 85 95 83
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.0190 0.0490 0.0200 0.0230 0.0136 0.0130 0.02 0.0084 0.0140
Sinuosity 1.08 1.04 1.10 1.08 1.14 - 1.10 1.33 1.29
Width/Depth Ratio 7.2 16.6 9.1 13.8 6.1-
6.9 11.8 9.1 19.1 14.1
Bank Height Ratio 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.0-1.1 1.3-
1.6 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 4.3 2.3 6.0 2.0+ 8.6-
10.5 1.6 6.0 3.3 2.2+
Reachwide d50 (mm) 40.6 50.6 22.6 - 13.3 - 22.6 - -

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 18 October 2020
Table 10: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT1 and UT3
Parameter
Existing References Proposed
UT1 UT3
Reach 2
Timber
Tributary
Riverbend
Park
UT to Rocky
Creek UT1 UT3
Reach 2
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres) 334 18 26 166 672 334 18
Channel/Reach Classification E4b E4b B4 C4 E4b C4b B4
Design Discharge Width (ft) 8.7 4.2 8.9 10.6 12.2 11.5 4.9
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.9 1.3 0.97 0.4
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 9.8 3.8 4.6 9.5 16.3 11.1 1.9
Design Discharge Velocity
(ft/s) 5.3 1.6 3.7 3.5 5.5 4.7 3.1
Design Discharge (cfs) 52 6 17 33 85 52 6
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.0212 0.0369 0.0334 0.0130 0.0200 0.0210 0.0340
Sinuosity 1.04 1.47 1.12 - 1.10 1.14 1.02
Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 4.7 17.0 11.8 9.1 11.8 12.3
Bank Height Ratio 1.4 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0-1.1 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 7.9 6.4 1.5 1.6 6.0 2.2+ 2.0+
Reachwide d50 (mm) 9.5 3.1 6.5 - 22.6 9.5 3.1

Table 11: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT2
Parameter
Existing References Proposed
UT2
Reach 2
Timber
Tributary
Agony Acres
UT1 Reach 3
UT2
Reach 2
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres) 43 26 96 43
Channel/Reach Classification C4b B4 B4 B4
Design Discharge Width (ft) 4.0 8.9 11.1 5.6
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.5
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 1.2 4.6 7.4 2.6
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 8.1 3.7 4.9 3.9
Design Discharge (cfs) 10 17 37 10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.0352 0.0334 0.0490 0.0380
Sinuosity 1.18 1.12 1.04 1.02
Width/Depth Ratio 12.7 17 16.6 12.1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1 1.0 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 1.5 2.3 2.0+
Reachwide d50 (mm) 24.1 6.5 50.6 24.1

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 19 October 2020
Table 12: Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT2
Parameter
Existing References Proposed
UT6
Reach 2
Ironwood
Tributary
UT to South
Fork Fishing
Creek
UT to Gap
Branch
UT6
Reach 2
Contributing Drainage Area
(acres) 10 19 13 26 10
Channel/Reach Classification A4 A5a+ B5a B4a/A4 A4
Design Discharge Width (ft) 2.1 5.0 4.1 6.2 3.7
Design Discharge Depth (ft) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3
Design Discharge Area (ft2) 1.6 2.7 1.8 3.8 1.2
Design Discharge Velocity (ft/s) 2.5 4.9 4.1 5.0 3.3
Design Discharge (cfs) 4 13 8 18.7 4
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.0870 0.1139 0.0815 0.0680 0.0822
Sinuosity 1.01 1.19 - - 1.00
Width/Depth Ratio 2.7 9.1 9.3 10.1 11.2
Bank Height Ratio 2.6 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 3.7 2.1 1.7 3.4 1.4+
Reachwide d50 (mm) 8.5 0.9 1.2 19.0 8.5
7.5 Sediment Transport Analysis
As discussed in Section 4.1, the UT1 and Venable Creek watersheds deliver some sediment to the onsite
streams, but the majority of sediment observed in the project streams originates through onsite erosion
and cattle access. The project stream and valley restoration will address the major sediment sources
within the watershed by protecting stream banks, removing cattle from the system, and reducing
channel shear stress. Buffers will be converted from pastures to planted native woody tree and shrub
species. The restored buffer will provide filtration for overland flow from remaining upland agricultural
fields. Additionally, four BMPs will be constructed to treat points of concentrated agricultural runoff.
The existing Site streams are not capacity limited, and the project should reduce sediment supply;
therefore, the focus of sediment transport analysis for design was to verify that the designed channels
will be stable over time and have the competence to pass the sediment that continues to be delivered
by the watershed.
7.5.1 Competence Analysis
Competence analyses were performed during design for each of the restoration reaches by comparing
shear stress associated with the design bankfull discharge, proposed channel dimensions, and proposed
channel slopes with the size distribution of the existing bed load. The analysis utilized standard
equations based on a methodology using the Shields (1936) curve and Andrews (1984) equation
described by Rosgen (2001). Channel slope and design dimensions were varied as possible until the
resulting design verified that the stream reach could move the bed load supplied to the stream. Each
stream reach design follows the natural fall of the valley, and design stream slopes can vary widely over
a design reach. For this reason, the lowest design slope was used in the competence analysis to ensure
that the sediment delivered by the watershed would pass through the lowest sloped reach. The results
of the analysis are shown in Table 13.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 20 October 2020
Table 13: Results of Competence Analysis
Venable Creek UT1 UT2 UT3 UT6
Reach 2 Reach 3 Reach 2 Reach 2 Reach 2
Dbkf (ft) 1.09 1.11 0.97 0.46 0.40 0.33
Minumum Schan (ft/ft) 0.0230 0.0070 0.0210 0.0320 0.0260 0.0820
Bankfull Shear Stress, t (lb/sq ft) 1.51 0.47 1.21 0.89 0.62 1.63
Dmax Bar/Subpavement (mm) 170 78 64 93 56 52
Dcrit (ft) 1.2 1.1 0.24 0.24 0.16 0.05
Scrit (ft/ft) 0.0171 0.0069 0.0051 0.01638 0.0105 0.0114
Movable particle size (mm)
Shield’s/Rosgen 120/206 36/87 95/175 69/139 47/107 130/218
Predicted Shear Stress to move
Dmax Shield’s/Rosgen 2.11/1.16 1.00/0.40 0.83/0.31 1.18/0.51 0.73/0.26 0.68/0.23

The initial competence analysis was based on the size material naturally found in the stream to mimic
potential bed load. The results were used to inform further design of the reach. Due to the steeper
nature of UT1, UT2, UT3, and UT6, the streams are often capable of moving particle sizes far greater
than that supplied by the watershed. By reviewing competence using the lowest design slope, often
where the stream enters the Venable Creek floodplain, the design was iterated to have enough slope so
as to continue to move sediment through the system without excessive aggradation. On Venable Creek,
the Andrew’s equation for gravel bed transport suggests that the design is close to equilibrium with the
watershed sediment supply. The Shield’s equation suggests that the stream design may not be
competent to pass the largest particle supplied by the watershed, while Rosgen’s equation suggests that
it is competent to move the watershed supply. Shield’s equation was based on data collected from
homogenous size distributions in flumes while Rosgen’s equation was based on data collected from
heterogenous size distribution in natural streams. Rosgen’s data set is more similar to the Site streams
and suggests that the Venable Creek design is more than competent to pass the sediment generated
from the watershed.
The excess shear throughout most of the Site streams influenced the design of rock and wood step
structures to provide grade control and increase roughness within the channel. Riffles with larger
materials, such as chunky riffles, were also integrated into the design as grade control. The proposed D50
and D100 for the constructed riffles on all stream reaches will be sized so that the reconstructed channels
will not produce enough shear stress to entrain the largest particles in these structures. This will ensure
a stable pavement while allowing for bed load material to be active within the system.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 21 October 2020
7.6 Project Implementation
Currently, the streams throughout the Site are extensively impacted by grazing. The primary stressors to
Site streams are livestock trampling and fecal coliform inputs, lack of stabilizing stream bank and
riparian vegetation, active erosion, and incision.
Wildlands’ approach to improving the streams on the Site includes a multi-tiered approach including
enhancement I and II, and Priority 1 restoration with Priority 2 restoration limited to confluences and
transition zones. The efforts will extend up to the stream origin on UT2, UT3, UT4, and UT6, and far into
the headwaters of UT2A and UT5, representing a holistic, watershed scale restoration of much of the
Site.
Venable Creek Reaches 1 and 4, UT2 Reach 1, UT2A, UT3 Reach 1, UT4, UT5, and UT6 Reach 1 are
relatively stable geomorphically, but historic and ongoing cattle access to the streams has resulted in
areas of trampled stream banks, erosion, and spot areas of poor riparian buffers. These reaches are
slated for enhancement level II, which will include correcting isolated areas of bank erosion on perennial
reaches.
Enhancement I is proposed for Venable Creek Reach 2. The profile will be adjusted within the existing
stream banks, and areas of bank erosion will be corrected. This reach serves as a transition between the
enhancement II length of Venable Creek Reach 1 to full restoration proposed on Venable Creek Reach 3.
Restoration practices are proposed on the remainder of the Site where persistent, systemic incision and
erosion cannot be addressed through spot treatment. Enhancement I efforts on Venable Creek Reach 2
allow for Venable Creek Reach 3 to connect directly to the historic floodplain using Priority 1 restoration
with a short, transitional length of Priority 2 restoration. Priority 1 restoration will continue to the
downstream reach extents, where a transitional length of Priority 2 restoration will be required to tie
the stream into the existing channel. UT2B will be garded to tie into the new location of Venable Creek
Reach 3.
UT1 will also be brought up to the historic floodplain beginning at the Siloam Road culvert, allowing for
an immediate transition to Priority 1 restoration. A short length of Priority 2 restoration ties UT1 into
Venable Creek Reach 2.
Restoration of UT2 Reach 2 begins at the confluence of UT2 and UT2A. As the valley widens, a critical
farm road along the left valley toe pinches the floodplain. This farm road will remain just outside of the
easement. To compensate for this pinch point, the right valley wall will be graded to widen UT2’s
floodplain. Cattle trampling through this valley will be corrected and UT2 Reach 2 will be restored to a
Honey Mill Mitigation Site

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 22 October 2020
single thread channel. UT2 Reach 2 will drop into Venable Creek over a structure, eliminating the need
for a transitional section of Priority 2 restoration.
UT3 Reach 2 will be brought up onto the historic floodplain beginning at a bedrock knickpoint, allowing
for immediate transition to Priority 1 restoration. Priority 1 restoration will continue downstream to UT3
Reach 2’s confluence with Venable Creek.
UT6 Reach 2 will be routed back to its original valley. Valley walls will be graded to stable slopes and
stable step-pool bedform will be constructed.
Along each restoration and enhancement reach, cattle will be excluded and open areas of the buffer will
be planted.
This proposed work will not only improve Site streams, but will restore the habitat fragmentation
caused by the current agricultural land use practices. Restoration of riparian buffers will connect the
entire watershed to the existing forested areas upstream of UT2 and UT5 and downstream on Venable
Creek to provide an uninterrupted riparian corridor. A concept plan for the Site is provided in Figure 8.
7.7 Onsite Best Management Practices
Eroding, ephemeral features and actively grazed cattle pasture
upstream of the origination of UT3, UT4, and UT6 concentrate
the pasture drainage to the stream channels. Cattle wallow
areas adjacent to Venable Creek are discrete sources for
sediment and fecal matter. Stormwater BMPs will be established
upstream of jurisdictional features within the conservation
easement to capture and treat the runoff from these areas. The
BMPs will be planted with appropriate native species to
encourage nutrient uptake, settling, and treatment. BMPs are
expected to capture sediment after construction and fill in over
time, transitioning to a vegetative filter feature. BMPs will not
be monitored or maintained.
7.8 Vegetation and Planting Plan
Non-forested areas within the conservation easement will be planted, which includes additional buffer
areas beyond the minimum requirement of 30 feet from top of bank. Riparian buffers will be planted
with native vegetation chosen to develop a forested riparian zone. The Dry-Mesic Oak-Hickory and Basic
Mesic Forest community types were used as references for creating the site planting plan. Many of the
selected species are representative of these community types although a few additional early
successional species were included to help climax species establish. Species chosen for the planting plan
are listed on Sheet 3.0 of the Draft Plans located in Appendix 12.
The riparian buffer and wetland areas will be planted with bare root seedlings. In addition, the stream
banks will be planted with live stakes and the channel toe will be planted with herbaceous species.
Permanent herbaceous seed will be spread on streambanks, floodplain areas, and disturbed areas
within the project easement. Bare root and live stake planting will take place during the dormant
season.
Some of the existing invasive species along restoration and enhancement reaches, including fescue
(Festuca spp.), will be treated with herbicide preconstruction, while invasives within active construction
corridors will be mechanically removed during construction. The extent of invasive species coverage will
be monitored, mapped, and controlled as necessary throughout the required monitoring period as
discussed in Appendix 7.
Stormwater BMP

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 23 October 2020
Utilities, Stream Crossings, and Site Access
Table 14 summarizes the proposed crossings on the Site. All crossings are included in the easement and
are existing utility or stream crossings. Ford or culvert crossings will be fenced with 5-strand barbed wire
or charged high-tensile wire and gated. The culvert pipes will be buried 6 to 12 inches to allow for a
natural stream bed through the crossing, promoting fish passage and aquatic habitat continuity. The
maintenance of the crossings will be the responsibility of the landowner once the project is closed by
the NCIRT and transferred to NCDEQ stewardship.
There are two overhead utility easements which overlap the project easement; one on Venable Creek
shown in Table 14 and one at the upstream end of UT6. UT6 originates within the utility easement. The
conservation easement extends to UT6’s origin but no credit is proposed within the utility easement.
The landowner plans to install cattle watering systems post-project at several locations as part of the
project implementation. The easement area can be accessed for construction, monitoring, and long-
term stewardship from Little Mountain Church Road and Siloam Road.
Table 14: Crossings Summary
Reach Crossing Location (STA) Crossing Type Within Conservation
Easement?
Venable Creek 102+99 Utility only/no stream bed
crossing or livestock access Yes
Venable Creek 132+75
Gated and fenced ford –
livestock access only during
coordinated crossing events
Yes
UT2 308+72 Fenced culvert – no
livestock access to stream Yes
7.10 Project Risk and Uncertainties
In general, this project is low risk. There is low risk of hydraulic trespass from the project due to the
current and designed slopes of the project channels. The farmers are on the land daily and will be able
to repair damaged fences and/or remove stray livestock from the easement quickly.
The rural agricultural zoning of the watershed protects it from potential urban development, however
there is always risk of logging on large tracts of forested land such as those within the Venable Creek
and UT1 watersheds. Logging of these watersheds could increase peak flows and sediment to these
streams. UT1’s watershed contains several impoundments which may function to control fine sediment
runoff and peak flows should logging occur.
Valley slope transitions, such as where the Site tributaries enter the broad Venable Creek floodplain, can
naturally function as aggradational areas. Sediment transport has been analyzed for restoration reaches
through valley transitions and the streams are expected to be competent to move the existing bedload
over time. Existing fine sediment sources, including streambank erosion and farm runoff, will be reduced
through stream bank repair and BMP installation, reducing the risk of aggradation due to capacity. If
unforeseen land use changes increase fine sediment loads beyond current levels, there is a risk of
aggradation at the valley slope breaks. This risk may be offset by additional vegetation on floodplains or
off-line sediment sink BMPs.
There is potential for utility line maintenance where the lines cross the easement on Venable Creek and
overlaps a portion of the easement at the upstream extents of UT6. No poles are located within the
conservation easement, so anticipated impacts are limited to vegetation maintenance, and these areas
were excluded from mitigation creidting. There is also future potential for the culverts under Little
Mountain Church Road and Siloam Road to be maintained in the future. The conservation easement

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 24 October 2020
does not overlap the road right-of-ways. If maintenance impacted the conservation easement, it is
anticipated to be limited to the area immediately in the vicinity of the culverts.
8.0 Performance Standards
The stream performance standards for the project have been developed based on guidance presented
in the DMS Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (June 2017) and the October
2016 NCIRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be
conducted to assess the condition of the finished project. Specific performance standard components
are proposed for stream morphology, stream hydrology, and riparian vegetation. Performance criteria
will be evaluated throughout the seven-year post-construction monitoring period. An outline of the
performance criteria components follows.
8.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
8.1.1 Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width-to-depth ratio. Per NCIRT guidance (2016), bank height ratios
shall not exceed 1.2 and entrenchment ratios shall be at least 1.4 for restored B channels and 2.2 for
restored C channels to be considered stable. Riffle cross sections should fall within the parameters
defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur, these changes will be
evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the channel
that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width-to-depth
ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not be taken if
channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
8.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Visual assessments and photo documentation should indicate that streams are remaining stable and do
not indicate a trend toward vertical or lateral instability. Signs of instability may include bank scour,
bank migration, and bed incision. Additionally, UT2 Reach 2 shall be visually assessed annually to
determine if the stream is maintaining single-thread form.
8.1.3 Substrate
Restoration reaches should show a progression towards or the maintenance of coarser materials in the
riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features. However, natural variations in pool and riffle
substrate is expected as a result of sediment transport processes in steeper sloped channels. A reach-
wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach each monitoring year for classification
purposes. A wetted pebble count will be performed during the baseline survey at surveyed riffles to
characterize the pavement. Riffles may fine over the course of monitoring due to the stabilization of
contributing watershed sediment sources.
8.2 Hydrology
Stream hydrologic monitoring will be conducted on stream reaches that utilize restoration and/or
enhancement level I approaches where in-stream work conducted alters channel dimensions below the
bankfull elevation. Automated pressure transducers will be used to bankfull events and are referred to
as crest gages (CG) in text and tables.
The occurrence of bankfull events will be documented throughout the monitoring period. Four bankfull
flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period.
Automated crest gages will be set to record bankfull events every three hours and will be installed
within the stream’s surveyed riffle cross section. The device will be checked quarterly to determine if a

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 25 October 2020
bankfull event has occurred. Evidence of bankfull events, such as the occurrence of debris lines and
sediment deposition, will be documented with photos when possible.
8.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative performance standard will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the
planted riparian and wetland areas at the end of the required seven-year monitoring period. The interim
measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at
the end of monitoring year three (MY3) and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of MY5. Also, trees
must average six feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and eight feet in height at the end
of the seventh monitoring year. The extent of invasive species coverage will be monitored and
controlled as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees with the riparian and wetland areas. The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency
of monitoring will be based on the DMS monitoring guidance documents. Vegetation monitoring will
occur between July 1 and leaf drop and will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008)
or another DMS approved protocol.
8.4 Other Parameters
8.4.1 Photo Documentation
Photographs should illustrate the Site’s vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid-channel bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
8.4.2 Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above.
9.0 Monitoring Plan
The Site monitoring plan has been developed to ensure that the required performance standards are
met and project goals and objectives are achieved. Annual monitoring data will be reported using the
DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting Template (June 2017). The monitoring report shall provide project
data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, ease population of
DMS databases for analysis and research purposes, and assist in close-out decision making.
Using the DMS Baseline Monitoring Report Template (June 2017), a baseline monitoring document and
as-built record drawings of the project will be developed following the planting completion and
monitoring installation on the restored site. Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each
monitoring year and submitted to DMS by November 30. Complete monitoring reports will be prepared
in the fall of monitoring year one, two, three, five, and seven and submitted to DMS. In monitoring years
four and six, a brief summary of the site conditions along with photos, current condition plan view
(CCPV) map, and applicable hydrology data will be prepared and submitted to DMS. The closeout
monitoring period will extend seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance
standards have been met. The closeout report will follow the DMS Closeout Report Template Version
2.2 (January 2016).
Table 15, below, describes how the monitoring plan is set up to verify that project goals and objectives
have been achieved.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 26 October 2020
Table 15: Monitoring Plan
Goal Objective Performance Standards Monitoring Metric
Exclude livestock
from stream
channels and
wetlands.
Install livestock fencing on all or
portions of the Site and/or
permanently remove livestock from all
or portions of the Site to exclude
livestock from stream channels and
riparian areas.
Fence conservation easement
to exclude livestock or
remove livestock from
adjacent land. Install fenced
and gated crossings as
needed.
Visual assessment.
Improve the
stability of stream
channels.
Reconstruct stream channels slated for
restoration with stable dimensions and
appropriate depth relative to the
existing floodplain. Add bank
revetments and in-stream structures
to protect restored/ enhanced
streams.
Stream pattern and profile
must remain stable. Bank
height ratios stay below 1.2.
Visual assessments showing
progression towards stability.
Reachwide pebble count
shows riffles are coarser than
pools.
Cross-section
monitoring, visual
assessment,
reachwide pebble
counts.
Improve instream
habitat.
Install habitat features such as
constructed steps, cover logs, and
brush toes on restored reaches. Add
woody materials to channel beds.
Construct pools of varying depth.
There is no required
performance standard for this
metric.
Visual assessment
Restore and
enhance native
floodplain
vegetation.
Convert active cattle pasture to
forested riparian buffers along all Site
streams, which will slow and treat
runoff from adjacent pasture before
entering streams. Protect and enhance
existing forested riparian buffers. Treat
invasive species.
In open areas planted with
bare roots; Survival of 210
planted stems per acre at
MY7. Interim survival of at
least 320 planted stems at
MY3 and at least 260 planted
stems per acre at MY5. No
success criteria is associated
with shaded area planting.
Permanent and
mobile 100 square
meter vegetation
plots within planted
open riparian areas.
Treat
concentrated
agricultural runoff
Install agricultural BMPs in areas of
concentrated agricultural runoff to
treat runoff before it enters the stream
channel.
There is no required
performance standard for this
metric.
Visual assessment.
Permanently
protect the
project site from
harmful uses.
Establish a conservation easement on
the Site. Exclude livestock from Site
streams.
Record and close conservation
easement prior to
implementation.
Visual assessment

9.1 Monitoring Components
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Tables 16 and 17. Approximate locations of
the proposed vegetation plots and cross section locations are illustrated in Figure 9.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 27 October 2020
Table 16: Monitoring Components
Parameter Monitoring Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes VC
Reach 1
VC
Reach 2
VC
Reach 3
VC
Reach 4 UT1 UT2
Reach 1
UT2
Reach 2
Dimension Riffle Cross-sections N/A 1 3 N/A 1 N/A 1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-sections N/A 0 2 N/A 1 N/A 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate Reach wide (RW) Pebble Count N/A 1 RW 1 RW N/A 1 RW N/A 1 RW Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3
Hydrology Crest Gage (CG) and/or
Transducer (SG) N/A 1 CG N/A N/A N/A N/A Semi-Annual 4
Vegetation CVS Level 2/Mobile Plots
(Permanent/Mobile)
8
(5/3) Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi-Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi-Annual 6
Project Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference
Photos Photographs 17 Annual 8
1. Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of
water, and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only, unless
observations indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or
survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only. Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide
substrate monitoring.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be monitored using automated pressure transducers. Transducers will set to record bank full events at least twice a day and stream flow at
least every 3 hours and will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually. Evidence of bankfull and stream flow events will be documented with a photo when possible.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be
monitored with permanent and mobile plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot
assessments will document number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.
8. 15 photo points will be installed as shown on Figure 9. 2 additional points will be established post-construction to document mature tree save areas.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 28 October 2020
Table 17: Monitoring Components
Parameter Monitoring Feature
Quantity/Length by Reach
Frequency Notes UT3
Reach 1
UT3
Reach 2 UT4 UT5 UT6
Reach 1
UT6
Reach 2
Dimension Riffle Cross-sections N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A 1 Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 1 Pool Cross-sections N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2 Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Substrate Reach wide (RW) pebble count N/A 1 RW N/A N/A N/A 1 RW Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 3
Stream
Hydrology
Crest Gage (CG) and/or
Transducer (SG) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Semi- Annual 4
Vegetation CVS Level 2/Mobile Plots
(Permanent/Mobile)
6
(4/2) Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 5
Visual
Assessment Y Y Y Y Y Y Semi- Annual
Exotic and
nuisance
vegetation
Semi- Annual 6
Project Boundary Semi- Annual 7
Reference Photos Photographs 9 Annual
1. Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location. Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water,
and thalweg.
2. Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits. Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations
indicate widespread lack of vertical stability (greater than 10% of reach is affected) and profile survey is warranted in additional years to monitor adjustments or survey repair work.
3. Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected during the baseline monitoring only. Substrate assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide substrate
monitoring.
4. Crest gages and/or stream gages will be monitored using automated pressure transducers. Transducers will set to record bank full events at least twice a day and stream flow at least
every 3 hours and will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually. Evidence of bankfull and stream flow events will be documented with a photo when possible.
5. Both mobile and permanent vegetation plots will be utilized to evaluate the vegetation performance for the open areas planted. 2% of the open planted acreage will be monitored
with permanent and mobile plots. Permanent vegetation monitoring plot assessments will follow CVS Level 2 protocols. Mobile vegetation monitoring plot assessments will document
number of planted stems and species using a circular or 100 m2 square/rectangular plot. Planted shaded areas will be visually assessed.
6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped
7. Locations of vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 29 October 2020
10.0 Long-Term Management Plan
The Site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program. This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for
the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the
conservation easement are upheld. Funding will be supplied by the responsible party on a yearly basis
until such time an endowment is established. The NCDEQ Stewardship Program is developing an
endowment system within the non-reverting, interest-bearing Conservation Lands Conservation Fund
Account. The use of funds from the Endowment Account will be governed by North Carolina General
Statue GS 113A-232(d)(3). Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used for the purpose of
stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if applicable.
The Stewardship Program will periodically install signage as needed to identify boundary markings as
needed. Any livestock or associated fencing or permanent crossings will be the responsibility the owner
of the underlying fee to maintain.
The Site Protection Instrument can be found in Appendix 8.
Table 18: Long-term Management Plan
Long-Term Management Activity Long-Term Manager Responsibility Landowner Responsibility
Signage will be installed and
maintained along the Site
boundary to denote the area
protected by the recorded
conservation easement.
The long-term steward will be
responsible for inspecting the Site
boundary during periodic inspections
(every one to three years) and for
maintaining or replacing signage to
ensure that the conservation
easement area is clearly marked.
The landowner shall report
damaged or missing signs to the
long-term manager, as well as
contact the long-term manager if
a boundary needs to be marked,
or clarification is needed
regarding a boundary location. If
land use changes in future and
fencing is required to protect the
easement, the landowner is
responsible for installing
appropriate approved fencing.
The Site will be protected in its
entirety and managed under the
terms outlined in the recorded
conservation easement.
The long-term manager will be
responsible for conducting annual
inspections and for undertaking
actions that are reasonably calculated
to swiftly correct the conditions
constituting a breach. The USACE, and
their authorized agents, shall have the
right to enter and inspect the Site and
to take actions necessary to verify
compliance with the conservation
easement.
The landowner shall contact the
long-term manager if clarification
is needed regarding the
restrictions associated with the
recorded conservation easement.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 30 October 2020
11.0 Adaptive Management Plan
Upon completion of Site construction, Wildlands will implement the post-construction monitoring
defined in Sections 8 and 9. Project maintenance will be performed during the monitoring years to
address minor issues as necessary (Appendix 9). If, during annual monitoring it is determined the Site’s
ability to achieve Site performance standards is jeopardized, Wildlands and DMS will notify the
members of the NCIRT and work with the NCIRT to develop contingency plans and remedial actions.
12.0 Determination of Credits
Mitigation credits presented in Table 19 are projections based upon the proposed design. The Site is
submitted for mitigation credit in the Yadkin 03040101. The credit ratios proposed for the Site have
been developed in consultation with the NCIRT as summarized in technical memorandum dated
September 25, 2018. This correspondence is included in Appendix 6.
1. The requested stream restoration credit ratio is 1:1 for mitigation activities that include
reconstruction of stable channels and restoring floodplain connection.
2. Venable Creek Reach 2 is proposed for enhancement I credit at a 1.5:1 ratio.
3. Enhancement II is proposed at different ratios throughout the Site to reflect different stressors
and levels of proposed treatment.
a. Venable Creek Reach 1 is proposed at 2.5:1 credit to reflect a combination of frequent
cattle access, degraded buffers, and areas of erosion that require repair. Venable Creek
Reach 4, while minimally impacted by cattle, is also proposed at 2.5:1 to account for
more extensive bank repair and bench grading.
b. UT3 Reach 1, UT4, UT5, and UT6 Reach 1 are proposed at 3:1 credit to reflect cattle
exclusion and spot erosion repair.
c. UT2 Reach 1 and UT2A are proposed at 4:1 credit to acknowledge that, while cattle
currently graze the understory here and will be excluded, their impact is minimal and
there is an existing forested canopy.
4. No credit is sought for the BMPs or for work required to extend UT2B to meet the new location
of Venable Creek Reach 3.
Buffers proposed throughout the Site meet the minimum required 30-foot standard width for Mountain
streams, and in most cases, far exceed it. The credit release schedule is provided in Appendix 11.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 31 October 2020
Table 19: Project Asset Table
Project Components
Project Component or
Reach ID
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage1, 2, 3
Mitigation
Category
Restoration
Level
Priority
Level
Mitigation
Ratio
Proposed
Credit
Venable Creek Reach 1
3,823
90.966
Cool
EII N/A 2.5 36.386
Venable Creek Reach 2 210.849 EI P3, P4 1.5 140.566
Venable Creek Reach 3 1,646.644 R P1 1 1,646.644
Venable Creek Reach 4 1,957.606 EII P3, P4 2.5 783.042
UT1 179 272.885 Cool R P2 1 272.885
UT2 Reach 1
1,154
741.847
Cool
EII N/A 4 185.462
UT2 Reach 2 342.364 R P1 1 342.364
UT2A 889 893.238 Cool EII N/A 4 223.310
UT2B 34 69.963 Cool N/A N/A 0 0.000
UT3 Reach 1
1,236
783.837
Cool
EII N/A 3 261.279
UT3 Reach 2 306.172 R P1/P2 1 306.172
UT4 446 440.341 Cool EII N/A 3 146.780
UT5 552 517.660 Cool EII N/A 3 172.553
UT6 Reach 1
588
213.725
Cool
EII N/A 3 71.242
UT6 Reach 2 204.747 R P1 1 204.747
Total Stream LF 8,901 8,692.843

Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream2 Riparian Wetland Non-Rip
Wetland Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv
Restoration 2,772.812
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Enhancement I 140.566
Enhancement II 1,880.054
Creation
Preservation
Totals 4,793.432
Notes:
1. Crossing lengths have been removed from credited stream footage.
2. No direct credit for BMPs.
3. UT6 originates within an overhead powerline easement. The conservation easement extends up to UT6’s origin under the
powerline, but proposed crediting does not begin until the stream exits the overhead easement.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 32 October 2020
13.0 References
Anthony, T., Hunter, B., Austin, K., Myers, B., Blackwell, D., Miler, D., Cornelius, J., Pardue, G., Doub, T.,
Swain, T., Hamby, A., Wooten, B., Hennings, B., Wooten, C. R. 2011. Yadkin County Land Use Plan.
http://www.yadkincountync.gov/DocumentCenter/Home/View/965
Chartrand, S.M., Jellinek, M., Whiting, P.J., Stamm, J. 2011. Geometric scaling of step-pools in mountain
streams: Observations and implications. Geomorphology 129:141-151.
Dunne, T. and L. B. Leopold. 1978. Water in Environmental Planning. W.H. Freeman and Company. New
York.
Giese, G.I and Robert R. Mason Jr. 1993. Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina. U.S.
Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2403.
Harman, W.A. and C.J. Jones. 2016. Functional Lift Quantification Tool for Stream Restoration Projects in
North Carolina: Data Collection and Analysis Manual. Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC.
Harman, W.A. and C.J. Jones. 2016. Functional Lift Quantification Tool for Stream Restoration Projects in
North Carolina: Spreadsheet User Manual Version 2. Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC.
Harman, W. R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function Based
Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Harman, W.H. et. al. 2000. Bankfull Regional Curves for North Carolina Mountain Streams. NC Mountain
Curve. Proc. AWRA Conf. Water Resources in Extreme Environments, Anchorage, AK. Pp. 185-190.
Hosking, J. R. M., and J. R. Wallis. 1993. Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis, Water
Resour. Res., 29(2), 271–281, doi:10.1029/92WR01980.
Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resources
Management. 1996. Rapid Stream Assessment Technique (RSAT) Field Methods. Montgomery County,
Maryland.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Web Soil Survey of Yadkin County.
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 2018, NCGS Publications.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/north-carolina-geological-
survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc
NCGS, 2013. Mineral Resources. http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/mineral-resources
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP), 2009. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database,
Yadkin County, NC.
North Carolina State University (NCSU), 2010. DrainMod Related Publications.
http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/soil_water/drainmod/drainmod_papers.html#wetland
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2015. North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan. Raleigh, NC.
Reavis, Hughes personal communication, December 23, 2015.

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
DMS ID No. 100082 Page 33 October 2020
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 2001. A stream channel stability assessment methodology. Proceedings of the Federal
Interagency Sediment Conference, Reno, NV, March 2001.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximateion. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Shore, Franklin, personal communication, June 20, 2017.
Simon, A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms 14(1):11-26.
Shields, D. F., Copeland, R. R, Klingman, P. C., Doyle, M. W., and Simon, A. 2003. Design for Stream
Restoration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(8): 575-582.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2016. Federal Public Notice: Notification of Issuance of
Guidance for Compensatory Stream and Wetland Mitigation Conducted for Wilmington District.
October 24, 2016.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2014. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Yadkin County, NC.
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/Yadkin.html
Walker, Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.
Surry County Planning Board, Surry County Planning and Development Department. (2019) Land Use
Plan 2040 for Surry County, North Carolina.
https://www.co.surry.nc.us/Surry%20County%20Land%20Use%20Plan%20Update%20Final_11_18_19
.pdf
Surry County. (2007) Zoning Map.
http://www.co.surry.nc.us/document_center/Planning/ZoningMap.pdf

FIGURES 
^_
¹
Proposed Conservation Easement
^_ Honey Mill Mitigation Bank Parcel Location
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (3040101)
Surry County, NC
0 2 41 Miles
2018 Aerial Photography
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P Venable CreekU T1UT2
UT2A
U
T2
UT3
UT4
UT5
UT6 U T 6 R e l i c
Re a c h 1Reach 2
Re a c h 3
Reach 1
Re a c h 2
Re a c h 4
Re a c h 1
Re a c h 2
Old Mill Remnants
Re a c h 2
Re a c h 1 XS13XS14XS8U T2B
XS7XS6X S3
XS10
XS11
XS2XS12XS9X S 1
X S 5
XS4
A
B
D
EFG
H
IJ
K
L
MNOPS
TUV
R
Q
W X
AAZ
Y
C
BB
Figure 2 Site Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (030401 01)
Surry County, NC¹2018 Aerial Photography
Project Parcel
Proposed Conservation Easement
Existing Wetlands
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
Non-Project Streams
Cross Sections
!P Reach Breaks
!(Cattle Wallow
!(Headcut
!(Bedrock
Existing C ulvert
Overhead Power Line
0 250 500125 Feet
(A)
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
UT6 10 ac (total)(UT6 R1 8 ac)
UT512 acUT49 ac
UT3 18 ac (total)(UT3 R1 15 ac)
UT2 R121 ac
UT2A21 ac
UT1334 ac
Venable CreekTotal Watershed705 ac
Venable Creek R1183 ac
Venable Creek R3599 ac
Venable Creek R2519 ac
UT2 & UT2A43 ac
144013601320128012601240122013401180142013801
4
4
0
1
3
8
0
13601320
1 4 2 0
1340106010401 0 2 0960
10801060112010201
0
4
0
1
0
2
098
09601 0 2 0
9 8 0940
14801460
146014401160114012801260 12401 2 2 011801160104010201040102098012601240112010801160114010809401040
1
4
8
0
1
3
2
0
1 2 6 0
1280980
980
1440128012601240114011401
0
4
0
1060 10401060
1 0 6 0
980
960142013401
2
8
0 1280126012601240
1240 122010801080980 960
9401180
940
Figure 3 Watershed Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 800 1,600400 Feet
2018 Aerial Photography
Proposed Conservation Easement
Venable Creek Watershed
Subwatersheds
Intermittent Project Stream
Perennial Project Stream
Non-Project Streams
Topographical Contour (20')
!P Reach Breaks
Figure 4 USGS Topographic Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 400 800200 Feet
Project Parcel
Proposed Conservation Easement
Mount Airy South USGS 7.5 - minute topographic quadrangle
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
UT6
UT5
UT2B
UT3
UT2
UT2A
UT1Venable CreekUT6 Relic
WoE
WoE
WoE
BbC
WoE
WoE
WoE
WoE
WoE
WoD
CsA
WoD
DeF
Figure 5 Soils Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (030401 01)
Surry County, NC¹2014 Aerial Photography
Project Parcel
Proposed Conservation Easement
BbC- Brad dock fine san dy loam
CsA - Colvard a nd Suches soils
DeF - Devotion-Rhodhiss-Bannertown complex
WoD- Woolwine-Fairview -Westfield complex
WoE- Woolwin e-Fairview-Westfield complex
Intermittent Project Stream
Perennial Project Stream
Non-Project Streams
!P Reach Breaks
0 300 600150 Feet
^_
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Critcher Brothers Reference Streams
UT to Gap Branch
Agony Acres UT1 Reach 3
Riverbend Park
Box Creek
UT to Rocky Creek
Figure 6 Reference Reach Vicinity Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 10 205 Miles
!P Reference Reach
^_Honey Mill Mitigation Site
y = 100.64x0.7615R² = 0.8769y = 55.699x0.7855R² = 0.9931y = 76.314x0.5145R² = 0.92951101001000100000.01 0.1 1 10 100Discharge (cfs)Drainage Area (square miles)Honey Mill Mitigation Site Design Discharge AnalysisNC Mountain CurveAlan Walker CurveRegional Flood Frequency - 1.2-year stormReference Reach CurveQmax - Existing Site StreamsDesign DischargesSurveyed Project Reaches (Manning's Eqn.)Site Design DischargeRegional Flood Frequency - 1.5-year stormPower (NC Mountain Curve)Power (Alan Walker Curve)Power (Reference Reach Curve)Figure 7 Design Discharge AnalysisHoney Mill Mitigation SiteYadkin River Basin (03040101)Surry County, NC
UT6
Venable CreekUT4
U T 3 Rea ch 1UT1 U T2
UT2A
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 4
UT5
Reach 1
Reach 2
UT2B
118011601140112010601040124012201080106010401020980960118011601
1
4
0
1
1
2
0 114011201
0
8
0
10801 0 6 0 112010801120
10809809601120
122010401
0
2
0 9801 0 8 0
1 0 6 0
A
B
D
EF
G
H
IJ
KL
MNOPS
TUV
R Q
W X
AAZ
Y
C
BB
Figure 8 Concept Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 250 500125 Feet
2018 Aerial Photography
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easem ent
Stream Enhancem ent I
Stream Enhancem ent II
Stream Restoration
No Credit
Existing Wetlands
Internal Crossing
Non-Project Streams
Topographical Contour (2 0')
Overhead Power Line
^_Proposed BMP
(A)
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
!A
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
Reach 1 Reach 2
Venable CreekUT5
UT4
UT3
Reach 1
UT1Reach 2
U T2
UT2A
Reach 3
UT6
Reach 4
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 1
Reach 2
UT2B
800+00 802+00
8 0 3 +0 0
804+00 8 0 5 +0 0 805 +5 2
100+00101+00102+00103+001
0
4
+
0
0 105+00106+001
0
7
+
0
0108+00109+00110+00111+00112+00113+00114+00115+00116+00117+001 18+00119+0012 0+00121+00 122+001
2
3
+
0
0 124+00125+00126+00127+00128+00129+00130+00131+00 132+00133+00134+00135+00 136+00137+00138+00139+001 4 0 +0 0
141+00
1
4
1
+
9
7
409+33
400+00
401+00402+00
403+00
405+00406+00
407+00
408+00
5 0 0 +0 0
501+00502+00
5 0 3 +0 0 505+00 506+00507+00 510+00600+006 0 1 +0 0 602+00603+00
604+00700+00
7 0 1 +0 0
7
0
2
+
0
0
703+00
300+00
301+00302+0 0
3 0 3 +0 0304+00
305+00
3 0 6 +0 0
307+00309+00
310+00311+002 0 0 +0 0 201+00202+00A
B
D
E
F
G
HIJ
K
L
MN
OP
S
TU
V
R Q
W X
AAZ
Y
C
BB
Figure 9 Monitoring Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 250 500125 Feet
2018 Aerial Photography
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easem ent
Internal Crossing
Existing Wetlands
Vegetation Plots
Mobile Vegetation Plots
Stream Enhancem ent I
Strean Enhancement II
Stream Restoration
Not for Credit
Non-Project Streams
Overhead Power Line
Cross Sections
!P Reach Breaks
^_BMP
GF Photo Points
!A Crest Gage
(A)
APPENDIX 1 – Historic Aerial Photos 
5208021.1
2014
= 500'
5208021.1
2010
= 500'
5208021.1
2006
= 500'
5208021.1
1993
= 500'
5208021.1
1982
= 500'
5208021.1
1976
= 500'
5208021.1
1966
= 750'
5208021.1
1950
= 500'
APPENDIX 2 – Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination 

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2018-01789 County: Surry U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Mount Airy South
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Requestor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Kristi Suggs
Address: 1430 S Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-332-7754
E-mail: [e-mail]

Size (acres) 40.1 Nearest Town Mount Airy
Nearest Waterway Ararat River River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040101 Coordinates Latitude: 36.429939
Longitude: -80.610504
Location description: Northeast of intersection of Siloam Rd. & Little Mountain Church Rd, Mount Airy, North Carolina
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
☒ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed revised delineation map submitted via email
on 6/18/2020. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other
resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that
would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further
instruction.
☐ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination

☐ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
☐The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
SAW-2018-01789
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steve Mchefski at 828-271-7980 ext. 4234 or
steven. kkichefski(a.usa ce. armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 07/16/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Set -vice, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request au administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division
�OVJ�ffii ce i r do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: �.-, Nl(� C' "77T
Date of JD: 07/16/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2018-01789
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0

Copy furnished:

Property Owner: Mary Lou Venable
Address: 140 Esses Lane
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
Telephone Number: 336-469-9116

Property Owner: LuAnn Venable Browne
Address: 929 Siloam Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030-7875
Telephone Number: 336-710-1313

Venable CreekUT2
UT2A
U
T
2
UT3
UT4
UT5
UT6 UT6 Relic
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
UT1
BB
UT2B
A
B
D
EFGH
IJ
K
L
MNOPSTUV
R Q
W X
AA
ZY
C
BB
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, NC Center for Geographic Information &
Analysis
Figure 3 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹2018 Aerial Photography
Assessment Area
Project Parcels
Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Existing Culvert
Non-Project Streams
Surveyed Top of Bank
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
Buried Perennial Project Stream
!.Utility Poles
0 300150 Feet
!(
!(
!(
!(
Venable Creek (3, 821 LF)
Reach 4
UT6 (588 LF)Perennial
UT6 Relic (80 LF)Intermittent
Y (0.002 AC)Z (0.001 AC)
AA (0.005 AC)
Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
SCP10
SCP11
DP13
DP12
Figure 3.1 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)Surry County, NC¹2018 Aerial Photography
Assessment Area
Project Parcels
Potential Wetland Waters
Surveyed Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
!(Wetland Data Point (DP#)
!(Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
0 7035 Feet
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(Venable CreekUT4
Reach 2
UT5 (377 LF)Intermittent
Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
UT5 (447 LF)Perennnial
UT6 (588 LF)Perennial UT6 Relic (80 LF)IntermittentY (0.002 AC)Z (0.001 AC)AA (0.005 AC)Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
UT5 Relic (82 LF)Perennnial
SCP9 SCP8
Figure 3.2 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)Surry County, NC¹2018 Aerial Photography
Assessment Area
Project Parcels
Potential Wetland Waters
Surveyed Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
!(Wetland Data Point (DP#)
!(Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
0 11557.5 Feet
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Reach 3
Venable Creek (3,821 LF)
C (0.346 AC)
C
K (0.657 AC)
L (0.003 AC)
M (0.004 AC)
N (0.001 AC)
O (0.022 AC)
P (0.007 AC)
Q (0.001 AC)
R (0.005 AC)
S (0.004 AC)
T (0.026 AC)
U (0.013 AC)
V (0.005 AC)
UT3 (1,236 LF)Perennial
W (0.012 AC)
X (0.003 AC)
UT4 (446 LF)Perennial
Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
BB (0.005 AC)
UT2B (664 LF)Perennial
Buried Channel
SCP6
SCP7
Figure 3.3 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)Surry County, NC¹Project Parcel
Assessment Area
Potential Wetland Waters
Surveyed Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
Buried Perennial Project Stream
!(Wetland Data Point (DP#)
!(Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
0 9045 Feet
2018 Aerial Photography
DP10
DP11
DP8
DP9
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
UT5Reach 4
Reach 2
Reach 1
UT1 (179 LF)
A (0.02 AC)
B (0.048 AC)
J (0.015 AC)
G (0.004 AC)E (0.007 AC)
D (0.067 AC)
C
K (0.657 AC)
F (0.013 AC)H (0.008 AC)
UT2A (889 LF)Perennial
I (0.005 AC)
UT2B (664 LF)Perennial
UT2 (16 LF)Intermittent
L (0.003 AC)
M (0.004 AC)
N (0.001 AC)
O (0.022 AC)
P (0.007 AC)
Q (0.001 AC)R (0.005 AC)
S (0.004 AC)
T (0.026 AC)
U (0.013 AC)
V (0.005 AC)
UT3 (1,236 LF)
W (0.012 AC)X (0.003 AC)UT4 (446 LF)
Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
BB (0.005 AC)
C (0.346 AC)
C
C
UT2 (1,154 LF)Perennial
Buried Channel
2018 Aerial Photography
SCP5
SCP3
SCP4
SCP12
DP11
DP10
DP9
DP8
DP6
DP7
DP3
DP5
DP4
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Figure 3.4 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹Project Parcel
Assessment Area
Internal Crossing
Potential Wetland Waters
Surveyed Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
Buried Perennial Project Stream
!(Wetland Data Point (DP#)
!(Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
0 12562.5 Feet
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
UT1 (179 LF)Perennial
A (0.018 AC)
B (0.048 AC)
C (0.46 AC)
C
C
K (0.34 AC)
UT2A (889 LF)
M (0.004 AC)N (0.001 AC)
Venable Creek (3,834 LF)Perennial
SCP1
SCP2
DP6
DP7
DP1
DP2
DP3
Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, NC Center for Geographic Information &
Analysis
Figure 3.5 Delineation Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹Project Parcel
Assessment Area
Potential Wetland Waters
Internal Crossing
Surveyed Top of Bank
Non-Project Streams
Existing Culverts
Potential Non-wetland Waters
Ephemeral Project Streams
Intermittent Project Streams
Perennial Project Streams
!(Wetland Data Point (DP#)
!(Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
!.Utility Poles
0 9045 Feet
2018 Aerial Photography

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: Wildlands Engineering, Inc., Kristi Suggs File Number: SAW-2018-01789 Date: 07/16/2020
Attached is: See Section below
☐ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
☐ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
☐ PERMIT DENIAL C
☐ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
☒ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Steve Kichefski
Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Steve Kichefski, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATI ON
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 6/15/2020

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wildlands Engineering, Inc., Kristi Suggs, 1430 S.
Mint Street, #104, Charlotte, NC 28203

C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Honey Mill Mitigation Site, SAW-
2018-01789

D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATI ON: Northeast of intersection of Siloam Rd. &
Little Mountain Church Rd, Mount Airy, North Carolina (no address assigned)
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Surry City: Ararat
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 34.429939 Longitude: -80.610504
Universal Transverse Mercator: UTM 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Ararat River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 9/4/19- 9/5/19, 9/14/19, 2/27/20, and 6/8/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.

Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resources in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section
10/404)
1.) Venable Creek 36.425879 -80.613589 3,834 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
2.) UT1 36.426044 -80.613817 179 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
3.) UT2 (Intermittent) 36.426881 -80.608853 16 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
4.) UT2 (Perennial) 36.426990 -80.608943 1,154 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
5.) UT2A 36.426248 -80.609019 889 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
6.) UT2B 36.428882 -80.609401 664 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
7.) UT3 36.429889 -80.614057 1,236 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
8.) UT4 36.430599 -80.611440 446 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
9.) UT5 (Intermittent) 36.430541 -80.607658 377 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
10.) UT5 (Perennial) 36.430603 -80.607719 447 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
11.) UT5 Relic 36.431264 -80.608222 82 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resources in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section
10/404)
12.) UT6 36.433433 -80.608325 588 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
13.) UT6 Relic 36.432644 -80.607187 80 LF Non-wetland
waters Section 404
12.) Wetland A 35.426942 -80.612880 0.018 AC Wetland waters Section 404
13.) Wetland B 36.427306

-80.612717

0.048 AC Wetland waters Section 404
14.) Wetland C 36.428046

-80.611172

0.346 AC Wetland waters Section 404
15.) Wetland D

36.427050

-80.609040 0.067 AC Wetland waters Section 404
16.) Wetland E 36.426181

-80.608940

0.007 AC Wetland waters Section 404
17.) Wetland F 36.426281

-80.609024

0.013 AC Wetland waters Section 404
18.) Wetland G 36.426357

-80.609314

0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
19.) Wetland H 36.426479

-80.609337

0.008 AC Wetland waters Section 404
20.) Wetland I 36.426849

-80.609749

0.005 AC Wetland waters Section 404
21.) Wetland J 36.427269

-80.610497

0.015 AC Wetland waters Section 404
22.) Wetland K 36.429045

-80.611301

0.374 AC Wetland waters Section 404
23.) Wetland L 36.429256

-80.611588

0.003 AC Wetland waters Section 404
24.) Wetland M 36.429073

-80.611946

0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
25.) Wetland N 36.429230

-80.612564

0.001 AC Wetland waters Section 404
26.) Wetland O 36.429285

-80.612746

0.022 AC Wetland waters Section 404
27.) Wetland P 36.429317

-80.613007

0.007 AC Wetland waters Section 404
28.) Wetland Q 36.429539

-80.613510

0.001 AC Wetland waters Section 404
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resources in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section
10/404)
29.) Wetland R 36.429623

-80.613594

0.005 AC Wetland waters Section 404
30.) Wetland S 36.429745

-80.613899

0.004 AC Wetland waters Section 404
31.) Wetland T 36.429924

-80.614006

0.026 AC Wetland waters Section 404
32.) Wetland U 36.429974

-80.614128

0.013 AC Wetland waters Section 404
33.) Wetland V 36.430099

-80.614204

0.005 AC Wetland waters Section 404
34.) Wetland W 36.430595

-80.611343

0.012 AC Wetland waters Section 404
35.) Wetland X 36.430542

-80.611153

0.003 AC Wetland waters Section 404
36.) Wetland Y 36.433434

-80.608192

0.002 AC Wetland waters Section 404
37.) Wetland Z 36.433403

-80.608109

0.001 AC Wetland waters Section 404
38.) Wetland AA 36.433101 -80.607728 0.005 AC Wetland waters Section 404
39.) Wetland BB 36.429240 -80.612340 0.005 AC Wetland waters Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: GIS figures including Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, & Soils
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Ratiot
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 :24,000 Scale Mount Airy South quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soils Survey Website
®National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS National Wetlands Inventoryy (Online Mapper)
❑ State/focal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: MAerial (Name & Date): 2018 aerial on GIS figures with submittal.
or Mother (Name & Date): Representative site photos with submittal.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
l G 6/I5/2020
Signature and date ofRegul tory Signature and date of person requesting PJD
staff member completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
DATR - 11(p t aL.2C> impracticable)'
r Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD fors. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

APPENDIX 3 – DWR and NCSAM Identification Forms 
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Pro ectlSite: �� �,� r
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County
Longitude --
Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent ��
��
Stream Determination (circLe_pne�
Other
if 2: 19 or perennial if>_ 30- '
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
n
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = i I L i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C-3-_)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
"�_ _
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3 "`
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
.,3.'�
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
C_2.
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
._2 -�'
3
8. Headcuts
'0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
;"_0.5,>
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3.,
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
31
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
4�
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.51_>
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
�1_"
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = �:
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
C_
2
1
0
19, Rooted upland plants in streambed
C3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2 _
3
22. Fish
b ',
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish'`0
>
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0_ >
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0' *
0.5
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5. Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 1

INC MVQ stream I(fell tificittioll hol-Ill Version 4_11
Date: i
Project/Site: . r , ,:> '
Latitude:
Evaluator �1 ,' ` `
Count y ..,�.A 't � ,,
Longitude:,.
g
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent (.� " 8��:
Stream Determination (cir .te.a.rle
Other
f�
if> 19orperennial if>_30" '
Ephemeral Intermittent (perennial
e.g. Quad Name.
A. Geomor hold (Subtotal = = )
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absen_t_
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
F37
j
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
(71
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
r' 3
4. Particle sire of stream substrate
0
1
2
C5')
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
Z- `
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
{""
3
8. Headcuts
0
'�__1_
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
15
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
artiriciai ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1 '7 - )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria5 s, ti
0
1
2
3�
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C;_17'
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
l� 1 ')
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
_.. _
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
-Yes =,eS
L. IJI010gy (subtotal = I l > )
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
� ��.:�
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
C 2°)
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
C�1� -
1.5
23. Crayfish
._.o-=`
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0:5 ,.
1
1.5
25. Algae
<_
0.5
L 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 40ther = 0_._.
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
4� i

NC DWQ Stream Identification Forth Version 4.11
Date: r '`
Project/Site:
(� ��
Latitude: 1�
Evaluator: , '
County �,
Longitude:__
Total Points: �-
Stream is at least intermittent -- ���
Stream Determination circle one
( )
Other 11
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30' l
Ephemeral rsrennia "
Ehemrl Intermittent �.„
e.g. Quad Name:
1C.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t '� .)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
C2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
17
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
C?��
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5`2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0-
'
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
<' _.1�
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
i� �
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
- 47)
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
�1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
(No = O,nn
Yes = 3
artilicial clitcries are not rated; see discussions in mama
............
B. Hydrology Subtotal = ("" , - )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2,
3
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1.5
0
r
0.5 "-'
0.5
1
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 ,,'' "
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes= 3 ._'
C. Biology Subtotal = l "'%
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
"3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3'
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
(__�3D
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
(_T~
22. Fish
:"
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
t e0,
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0 `
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: JAI t(� �V/.-
1
\.... I Y 0. }'i v '.
( t (f ) h
J

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site: ( (�; 4 (
Latitude: - I - � 11 ,
61
Evaluator: ( ra
County:
Longitude: - -
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination circle one)
Ephemera In ermitten Perennial
Other UT,1 w�
if z 19 or perennial if � 30"
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a• Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
, ,
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
r 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artiticlal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
�)
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
U. 1:31010gv fbubtotal = Co 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
13
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
U
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
{ 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Pther = 0;.<,;
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: Shoe �F � �.0 �6
{
k e L�➢'` t. � �.
� r �. �
�� , �<� _
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: r
Project/Site:
Latitude:
Evaluator:u<�r �'
-a
Count Y
Longitude:
9 8D-C;'
Total Points:
.f S1
Stream Determination (cir e
Other U
Stream is at least intermittent _ _K
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent
P
e. Quad Name:
g�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a* Continuity of channel bed and bank .�_
0
1
2 `'
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 ''
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
.,
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
'0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
t 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
r No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology, Subtotal = 1i�).
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
/ 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
( 1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
<0.
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5 ,
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0�
' Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(
2
'1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0'
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
b,
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(0
0.5
1,
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
tti
1.5
25. Algae
0
_ , t3:
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed �_
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p 35 of manual. --'----""p" "'
Notes: 3 �.
Sketch:

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: - _ Project/Site: y- Latitude: �, ` 't'_, i
Evaluator: °+, County: s L{ Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determinationlcirc Other
Stream is at least intermittent 1
' e:
v
if>_ 19 or perennial if> 30* Ephemeral intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Nam
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
-
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
, 0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
A 2
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
' No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
Q W firnlnnv t Q I IhfnfaI = I (-) 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 55
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r` Rinlnnv rCiihfnfal = ,I . ``i 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
ti, 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
4 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
6'
1
2
3
22. Fish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
124. Amphibians
'0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
s
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75 OBL
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
H
Sketch:
I
i
41

-r
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: i o Project/Site: \� i Latitude: i. t�
r
Evaluator: ? County: R `Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten erennia e.g. Quad Name:4
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R I-lvrirnlnnv (Gi ihtntnl = q 1
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
0
1
=7
3
0
9
2
3
0
1
(V
3
0
1
`2,
3
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
2
3
0
1
3
0
0.5
1
(".5
0
0.5
1
1.
No=O
Yes
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
9
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0
Yes = 3
(, Rinlnnv (Ciihtntal = is ) 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
i. 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
ID3
! 21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
11�)
2
3
22. Fish
'0 ;
075
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0,';k
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 4 f" ¢._ ,
'i
K
Sketch:
i
a
a
i
i
i

NC DXVO S;tv,t ,,n, xr_ ...:,, r ,
Date:
�
Project/Site:� J'..
Latitude:
Evaluator: \A 'r r
J_ .� •,
Count y: a
Longitude:
L
Total Points:
C�
Stream is at least intermittent �` 1
t
if > 19 or perennial if >_ 30" i t /
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennials
P �
Other
e.g. Quad Name: (�(?
.
„
ADsent
0
Weak
Moderate
Strong
13Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
-1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
1>
3
ripple -pool se uence
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict flood lain
p _
0
- -,
<�.1--
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
%r3"'>
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
(7 -
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Cfi?
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 _ 0.5
1 -
11. Second or greater order channel
a
C m too-_=.0 "
Yes = 3
artifir in (i it, hoc � .,t .-,� ,A- .. ., A:, ---:---
B. Hvdroloov (suhtntal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
7._1�r
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
C� :!T>
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No
"` 1 -._ 1.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
..3--'
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
'.�3.
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2 7
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2!
r3"
22, Fish
°0
0.5
1
LS �
23. Crayfish
"z0"a
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
777�7.,5
m.
1
1.5
25. Algae
= '0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ���A �� � ��,. � � . Fir �f s*� 1 . � 1 �� � � y 1 i
r
Y` `k � i � •<° r
l
,J
"ii
l« dl. (� 4d f i�n.i4•
i n
�/
r �� i I, y-
F
Sketch:
"•i

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I - a 0
Project/Site: 40ACy �; i`°
Latitude: tt
Evaluator:-
County: Sv,
Longitude: -
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one
E hemer Intel
Others 4r„
Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
P erennial
e. g' {
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = II )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank �,,
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
(
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3)
5.Active/relict floodplain� !��
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0)
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
Ly
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
C92
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =� )
12. Presence of Baseflow w,-V 4")r
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
zz.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) I p"JA C
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 10
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
.5
23. Crayfish
ID0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians s.r�e.,x;
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 5.,,E
w.%.,.M.
Sketch:^

NC DWQ Stream Identification Forin Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site:
a
Latitude: �' t
Evaluator: t
County f f< a
Longitude: iR
tzf F
Total Points: 2 ,
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent ;
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30`
P hemera ntermittent Perennial
e. Quad Name:
9
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ) '!: )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
C 3)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
;` 1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
( 61-
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
7._0� .
1°
2
3
9. Grade control
0 ''
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual _ .r
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5�
1
0.5
_ 0>
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
a 0,5 '
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No, = 0I
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = S
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed�
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fishf
'
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0'
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
"0-)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
"- 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 (other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
w
Notes:
Sketch:

NC: DN1'Q Sti•ean] Identification Form Versinn -4-1 1
Date: " � �� � fl -;
Project/Site: � e a �(
--
Latitude: i
Evaluator 1 � rr -
County S(i
,. i t
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent .
- --V - -
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
--_
Other
if> 19 or perennial if 2: 30`
e.g. Quad Name:
r
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = E % )
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent _
0
Weak
1y
Moderate
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
.
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
z
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
w ,
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
;=
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
(
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1 5�
11. Second or greater order channel
a
ti. "No = 0�
Yes = 3
a,unuar utcnes are ndt rated. see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = r_- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
12
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
�" 1,^'
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0 5z
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3 .
L. moiogy (Subtotal = I k
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
q
0
`
�,mwW1.�_�
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5., Othery=gip
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
r
y �

t
NC Doti0 Stream Identitiention Fnrn, Vi�rmm A t a
Date '
-- -- =- -
Project/Site:��fr���
Latitude ( ,�{11 a
Evaluator. , �t, ,i ,
Count
Longitude:. ,�� �� . 01
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19or
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Rerennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: ';
perennial if>_30
(
H. ueomor nolo (subtotal = I',.)_: )
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
a_>
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
C _
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
_
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0_-;;
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
p
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
�a��-0 ,
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
__.__ 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
72 ?
3
9. Grade control
0
< b_5, ?
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
C
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0;._.
Yes - 3
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ,7), t
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
�-�
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
CV0.5-
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
V. t JUJUUV 1i1uu1LJ1 lJ - ! Al 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 •
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
_0
CL>
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
l 0-
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1,
1.5
25. Algae
0* "'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5,,9ther'='0°
,
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
" "`------
Notes: i SC C"�Vt �` $ c .. I
iJ CA, I %_
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.42603, -80.613574
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): VC R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 - 6' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pb2 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.426538, -80.613356
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): VC R2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 - 3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 - 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography LOW (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.429563, -80.61098
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): VC R3 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 1,500
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3-6' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography LOW (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.432749, -80.606299
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): VC R4 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 1,880
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 5' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 15' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pa3 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH (4) Microtopography LOW (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.426039, -80.613595
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 - 3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 - 8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography LOW (3) Stream Stability LOW (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.427775, -80.610869
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT2A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 - 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow MEDIUM (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.427931, -80.611003
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT2 R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 - 8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.428599, -80.611313
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT2 R2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 3' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 - 8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow MEDIUM (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography MEDIUM (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow MEDIUM (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/05/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.429054, -80.612263
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT3 R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 - 8' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/05/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow MEDIUM (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW (2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM (3) Baseflow MEDIUM (3) Substrate MEDIUM (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA (3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA (2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/05/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.429582, -80.611076
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT3 R2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 150
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 - 7' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/05/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H. Reed/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM (2) Baseflow MEDIUM (2) Flood Flow MEDIUM (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability MEDIUM (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM (2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM (3) Baseflow MEDIUM (3) Substrate MEDIUM (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM (2) Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM (3) Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.43018, -80.61042
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT4 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 440
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 - 5' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability HIGH (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/04/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.431343, -80.608299
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT5 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 320
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 - 10' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/04/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer HIGH (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate HIGH (3) Stream Stability HIGH (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/05/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.432976, -80.60758
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT6 R1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 300
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/05/2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology HIGH (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow HIGH (3) Streamside Area Attenuation HIGH (4) Floodplain Access HIGH (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM (4) Microtopography NA (3) Stream Stability HIGH (4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology HIGH
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat HIGH (2) In-stream Habitat HIGH (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate MEDIUM (3) Stream Stability HIGH (3) In-stream Habitat HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat HIGH (3) Stream-side Habitat MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/05/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.432451, -80.60716
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT6 R2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 265
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 - 2' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 15' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/05/2019
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM (4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW (4) Microtopography HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW (4) Channel Stability LOW
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW (2) In-stream Habitat LOW (3) Baseflow HIGH (3) Substrate LOW (3) Stream Stability LOW (3) In-stream Habitat LOW (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same prope rty, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the “Notes/Sketch” section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Honey Mill 2. Date of evaluation: 09/05/2019
3. Applicant/owner name: NCDMS 4. Assessor name/organization: K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.
5. County: Surry 6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ararat River 7. River basin: Yadkin
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 36.432563, -80.606856
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): UT6 Relic 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 120
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 7' Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 15' 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? Yes No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: Mountains (M) Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer Coastal Plain (O)
16. Estimated geomorphic
19 valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream):
A B
(more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) Size 4 (≥ 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
Section 10 water Classified Trout Waters Water Supply Watershed (I II III IV V)
Essential Fish Habitat Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
Publicly owned property NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish 303(d) List CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in “Notes/Sketch” section or attached? Yes No

1. Channel Water – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
A Water throughout assessment reach.
B No flow, water in pools only.
C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction – assessment reach metric
A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates , debris jams,
beaver dams).
B Not A
3. Feature Pattern – assessment reach metric
A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile – assessment reach metric
A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability – assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting (head-cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction – streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access , disruption of flood flows through streamside area , leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
C C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors – assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in “Notes/Sketch”
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
I Other: (explain in “Notes/Sketch” section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather – watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream – assessment reach metric
Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types – assessment reach metric
10a. Yes No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
vegetation
C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
E Little or no habitat
F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
G Submerged aquatic vegetation
H Low-tide refugia (pools)
I Sand bottom
J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
K Little or no habitat

*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. Yes No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
A Riffle-run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool-glide section (evaluate 11d)
C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach – whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) = > 40-70%, Predominant (P) = > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 – 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 – 256 mm)
Gravel (2 – 64 mm)
Sand (.062 – 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip-rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. Yes No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check for Tidal Marsh Streams Only
12. Aquatic Life – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. Yes No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. No Water Other:
12b. Yes No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to “individuals” for Size 1 and 2 streams and “taxa” for Size 3 and 4 streams.
Adult frogs
Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles
Caddisfly larvae (T)
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans
Mayfly larvae (E)
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (P)
Tipulid larvae
Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
A A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage – streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water ≥ 6 inches deep
B B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
N N
16. Baseflow Contributors – assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors – assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
C Urban stream (≥ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F None of the above
18. Shading – assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider “leaf-on” condition.
A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider “vegetated buffer” and “wooded buffer” separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
A A A A ≥ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
E E E E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Vegetated” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Mature forest
B B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D D Maintained shrubs
E E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A A A A Row crops
B B B B B B Maintained turf
C C C C C C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
D D D D D D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 (“Wooded” Buffer Width).
LB RB
A A Medium to high stem density
B B Low stem density
C C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
A A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition – streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contribute s to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
A A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proport ions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single spec ies or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity – assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. Yes No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. No Water Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A < 46 B 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ≥ 230

Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1

Stream Site Name Honey Mill Date of Assessment 09/05/2019
Stream Category Pa1 Assessor Name/Organization K. Suggs/ Wildlands Eng.

Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent

Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW (2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH (2) Flood Flow LOW LOW (3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW LOW (4) Floodplain Access LOW LOW (4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW (4) Microtopography HIGH HIGH (3) Stream Stability LOW LOW (4) Channel Stability LOW LOW
(4) Sediment Transport LOW LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1) Water Quality LOW LOW
(2) Baseflow HIGH HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors YES YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA (2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW (2) In-stream Habitat LOW MEDIUM (3) Baseflow HIGH HIGH (3) Substrate LOW LOW (3) Stream Stability LOW LOW (3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM HIGH (2) Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW (3) Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

APPENDIX 4 – Supplementary Design Information 

min max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage area DA sq mibankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSF 16.9 18.1avg velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeet 10.5 10.8maximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeet 2.2 2.3mean depth at bankfulldbkffeet 1.6 1.7bankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkf6.1 6.9low bank height feet 2.8 3.7bank height ratio BHR 1.3 1.6floodprone area widthwfpafeet 93.4 110.5entrenchment ratio ER 8.6 10.5max pool depth at bankfulldpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfBkf pool cross‐sectional area ApoolSFpool area ratioApool/Abkfpool‐pool spacing p‐p feet 34 61 21 52 21 33 8 46 20 22 7 18pool‐pool spacing ratiop‐p/Wbkf3.2 5.7 1.9 4.9 2.5 3.9 2.0 11.6 4.7 5.3 3.3 8.7valley slopeSvalleyfeet/footchannel slopeSchannelfeet/footsinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet 16.5 27.0 11.9 12.5meander width ratiowblt/wbkf1.5 2.5 3.0 3.2meander lengthLmfeetmeander length ratioLm/wbkflinear wavelength LWlinear wavelength ratioLW/wbkfradius of curvatureRcfeet 5.7 9.7 4.3 6.3radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf0.5 0.9 1.1 1.6d50 reachwide d50 mm40.6 13.3 9.5 24.1 3.1 8.5Existing Conditions Geomorphic ParametersParameter Notation UnitsVenable Creek Reach 2Venable Creek Reach 3UT1UT2 Reach 2UT3 Reach 2UT6 Reach 23.8 1.60.020.03E4 E/C410.64.8E4b C4b E4b A49.8 1.20.81 0.94 0.52 0.0715.64.2 2.12.51.68.7 4.04.9 5.3 8.10.9 0.81.11.11.1 0.32.0 1.6 0.41.51.645.71.6 2.92.74.72.4 0.47.6 12.73.27.227.1 7.62.61.568.4 10.51.4 1.01.1 1.63.76.42.4 2.2 2.2 0.67.9 2.74.34.2 2.32.01.310.8 10.2 8.4 6.41.4 1.9 2.01.73.3 2.51.11.020.3 18.0 11.5 2.51.0 1.0 1.61.00.0376 0.08221.50.90.0213 0.0198 0.0284 0.04301.1 1.2 2.01.31.47 1.010.08700.03691.08 1.14 1.04 1.180.0190 0.0136 0.0212 0.035214.023.3N/A N/AN/AN/A2.1 5.819.1 13.9N/AN/A5.522.81.3N/A ‐ Channelized stream channel with limited pattern and bed form profile variability.22.8N/AN/AN/A1.8 3.5N/A0.70.67.02.7Honey Mill Mitigation SiteAppendix 4
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 1, Venable Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
15.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.6 width (ft)
1.5 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
12.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.3 hyd radi (ft)
7.2 width-depth ratio
45.7 W flood prone area (ft)
4.3 entrenchment ratio
1.6 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
0 102030405060Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
01020304050607080901000.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution Pavement SummarySubpavement SummaryBar SummarySilt/ClaySandGravelCobbleBoulderBedrockVC Reach 2 - XS1
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 2, Venable Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
20.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.8 width (ft)
1.9 mean depth (ft)
2.4 max depth (ft)
12.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.6 hyd radi (ft)
5.8 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
0 1020304050Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 3, Venable Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
18.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.2 width (ft)
1.8 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
10.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.7 hyd radi (ft)
5.8 width-depth ratio
--- W flood prone area (ft)
--- entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
2996
2998
3000
3002
3004
3006
3008
3010
3012
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 4, Venable Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
18.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.5 width (ft)
1.7 mean depth (ft)
2.3 max depth (ft)
11.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.6 hyd radi (ft)
6.1 width-depth ratio
110.5 W flood prone area (ft)
10.5 entrenchment ratio
1.6 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
2996
2998
3000
3002
3004
3006
3008
3010
3012
0 102030405060708090100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary Subpavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
VC R3 -XS4
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 5, Venable Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
16.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.8 width (ft)
1.6 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
11.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.5 hyd radi (ft)
6.9 width-depth ratio
93.4 W flood prone area (ft)
8.6 entrenchment ratio
1.3 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
3494
3496
3498
3500
3502
3504
0 102030405060708090100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary Subpavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
VC R3 -XS5
fe;.ve-.in-.ax-.s-1---.ts--.d------w-d-s---------U-xy,-,E-,reach --- --- 10188.0 --- --- ---C-,riffle 7.1 (3.4 - 12) --- 16.1 (5.9 - 22.1) --- --- ---- ,pool 0 (0 - 0.19) --- 17.0 (9.3 - 31.7) --- 46.4 (34.3 - 60. ----its,--- --- --- --- --- ----,--- --- --- --- --- ----,-s,slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratiop-p ratiopool-pool spacing (ft)XS1XS298598798999199399599710000Elevation (ft)Channel Distance (ft)Venable Creek Reach 2bedwater srfbankfullx-sectionriffle crestpoolrunglideLTBRTB
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Venable Creek Reach 2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
Venable Creek Reach 3
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 6, UT1
Bankfull Dimensions
11.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)
8.4 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.2 max depth (ft)
10.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
6.1 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
1998
2000
2002
2004
0 102030405060708090100Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 7, UT1
Bankfull Dimensions
9.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
8.7 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
7.6 width-depth ratio
68.4 W flood prone area (ft)
7.9 entrenchment ratio
1.4 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
1998
2000
2002
2004
0 1020304050607080Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1 -XS7
Longitudinal Slope PLongitudinLongitudinal Slope Profilef.ve.in.ax.s1-.ts-.dwdsUEreach 2.1 --- 80127.3(9263.3 channel width--- --- ---Criffle 7.1 (4.5 - 10) 3.4 (2.1 - 4.813.2 (8.7 - 20.7) 1.5 (1 - 2.4) --- ---pool 0 0 7.2 (5.6 - 9) 0.8 (0.6 - 1) 27.4 (21.4 - 33. 3.2 (2.5 - 3.9)run 3.8 (0.73 - 8.3) 1.8 (0.3 - 4) 20.3 (3.8 - 44.6) 2.3 (0.4 - 5.2) --- ---glide --- --- 5.2 0.6 --- ---slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratiop-p ratiopool-pool spacing (ft)XS6XS719971998199920002001200220032004200580000 80010 80020 80030 80040 80050 80060 80070 80080 80090 80100 80110 80120 80130Elevation (ft)Channel Distance (ft)UT1bedwater srfbankfullx-sectionriffle crestpoolrunglideLTBRTBc
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT1
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 8, UT2 Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
1.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)
4.0 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
4.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
12.7 width-depth ratio
10.5 W flood prone area (ft)
2.7 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
3997
3999
4001
0 10203040506070Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary Subpavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2 R2 -XS8
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 9, UT2 Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
2.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)
6.4 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
6.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
16.4 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
3996
3998
4000
4002
4004
0 10203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
fe;.ve-.in.ax.s1-.ts-.d------w-d-s---------U--E-reach --- --- 20179.7 --- --- ---C-riffle 7 (3 - 13) --- 15.8 (4.1 - 41) --- --- ----pool 0 (0 - 0.65) --- 4.2 (1.8 - 9.7) --- 22.0 (8.1 - 45.9 ----run 14 (0.35 - 44) --- 3.1 (2 - 5.1) --- --- ----glide --- --- 4.6 (2.8 - 6.6) --- --- -----slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratiop-p ratiopool-pool spacing (ft)XS8XS9399139923993399439953996399739983999400020000Elevation (ft)Channel Distance (ft)UT2 Reach 2bedwater srfbankfullx-sectionriffle crestpoolrunglideLTBRTB
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT2 Reach 2
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 10, UT3 Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
3.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
4.2 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
4.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
4.7 width-depth ratio
27.1 W flood prone area (ft)
6.4 entrenchment ratio
1.5 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
4996
4998
5000
5002
0 10203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3 R2 -XS10
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 11, UT3 Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
3.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
4.2 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
5.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
5.2 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
4996
4998
5000
5002
5004
0 10203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
fe;.ve-.in-.ax-.s-1---.ts--.d------w-d-s---------U-xy,-,E-,reach --- --- 30128.9 --- --- ---C-,riffle 4.8 (1.7 - 7.5) --- 18.0 (8.1 - 32.4) --- --- ---- ,pool 0 --- 4.7 (3.7 - 5.6) --- 21.1 (19.8 - 22. ----its,--- --- --- --- --- ----,--- --- --- --- --- ----,-sp,slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratiop-p ratiopool-pool spacing (ft)XS10XS11499749984999500050015002500330000 30050 30100Elevation (ft)Channel Distance (ft)UT3 Reach 2bedwater srfbankfullx-sectionriffle crestpoolrunglideLTBRTB
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT3 Reach 2
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 12, UT6 Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
2.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
6.1 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
6.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
16.5 width-depth ratio
10.1 W flood prone area (ft)
1.6 entrenchment ratio
1.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
6986
6988
6990
6992
0102030Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Riffle
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary Subpavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT6 R1 -XS12
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
Cross Section 13, UT6 Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
2.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)
2.3 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
4.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
2.1 width-depth ratio
Survey Date: 6/2019
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
5996
5998
6000
6002
0 10203040Elevation (ft)Width (ft)
Pool
Existing Conditions (8/2016)Bankfull Floodprone Area
Cross Section Plots
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Existing Conditions
CrossSection14,UT6Reach2
BankfullDimensions
1.6 xͲsectionarea(ft.sq.)
2.1 width(ft)
0.8 meandepth(ft)
1.1 maxdepth(ft)
3.4 wettedparimeter(ft)
0.5 hydradi(ft)
2.7 widthͲdepthratio
7.6 Wfloodpronearea(ft)
3.7 entrenchmentratio
2.6 lowbankheightratio
SurveyDate: 6/2019
FieldCrew: WildlandsEngineering
ViewDownstream
5996
5998
6000
6002
0 1020304050Elevation(ft)Width(ft)
Riffle
ExistingConditions(8/2016)Bankfull FloodproneArea
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pavement-Subpavement Particle Distribution
Pavement Summary Subpavement Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT6 R2 -XS14
Longitudinal Slope P LongitudinLongitudinal Slope Profile.ve.in.ax..s.dreach --- --- 40061.6 --- --- ---riffle 21 (8.6 - 29) --- 6.6 (4.8 - 9) --- --- ---pool 0 (0 - 13) --- 5.8 (2.8 - 9.1) --- 13.2 (6.9 - 18.1 ------ --- --- --- --- ------ --- --- --- --- ---slope (%) slope ratio length (ft) length ratiop-p ratiopool-pool spacing (ft)XS14XS135992599359945995599659975998599960004000040050Elevation (ft)Channel Distance (ft)UT6 Reach 2bedwater srfx-sectionriffle crestpoolrunglideLTB
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000Percent Cumulative (%)Particle Class Size (mm)
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Reach Summary Riffle Summary Pool Summary
Silt/Clay Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock
UT6 Reach 2
min max min max min max min max min max min max min max min maxstream typedrainage area DAsq midesign discharge Qcfsbankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSFaverage velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeetmean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfdepth ratiodmax/dbkffeetbank height ratio BHRfloodprone area widthwfpafeetentrenchment ratio ERvalley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchnlfeet/ footriffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot0.034 0.28 0.02 0.15 0.024 0.2 0.01 0.14 0.013 0.044 0.1 0.1 0.010 0.08riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schnl0.30 2.46 0.69 4.49 0.29 2.45 0.16 2.06 1 3.4 2.6 3.8 1.2 9.5pool slopeSpfeet/ foot0 0.21 0 0.082 0 0.17 0.00 0.06 0 0.005 0 0.004 0.0000 0.0008pool slope ratioSp/Schnl0 1.84 0 2.46 0 2.09 0.06 0.90 0 0.4 0 0.2 0.00 0.10pool‐to‐pool spacingLp‐pfeet3.1 30.6 6 49.40 6.3 32 18.4 26.8 9 70 26.3 81.3 28.8 88.5pool spacing ratioLp‐p/wbkf0.6 6.1 0.70 5.60 1.5 7.8 2.99 4.35 0.8 6.4 2.2 6.7 1.2 3.8pool cross‐sectional areaApoolSFpool area ratioApool/Abkfmaximum pool depthdpoolfeetpool depth ratiodpool/dbkfpool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfsinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet62.0 87.8meander width ratiowblt/wbkf2.6 3.7linear wavelength (formerly meander length)Lmfeet38.8 76.2linear wavelength ratio (formerly meander length ratio)Lm/wbkf1.70 3.20meander length feet‐‐‐ ‐‐‐23.00 38.1meander length ratio‐‐‐ ‐‐‐1.0 1.6radius of curvatureRcfeetradius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkfd16mmd35mmd50mmd84mmd95mmd100mmN/ACoarse Gravel<0.0632.422.6120256UT to Rocky Creek1.610.90.91.1N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.317260.030.0219.31.22.2E4b1.058516.35.512.21.81.39.11.31.55 1.61.04‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐2.38.50.82.32.69.70.9‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐0.97819.02102.3256>2048‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐9.83.4‐‐‐‐‐‐Agony Acres UT1 Reach 3Sightly Entrenched B4a or A418.73.8 7.45.06.2 11.1110.6 0.710.1 16.61.71‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐UT to Gap Branch0.0420.92.30.068B40.15UT to South Fork Fishing CreekB5a0.02374.911250.050.0490.0815‐‐‐Riverbend ParkC40.26339.5NotationUnits0.09d50 Description1.84.10.70.49.31.8171.7‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Reference Reach Geomorphic ParametersCross‐SectionSlopeProfilePatternParticle Size Distribution from Reach‐wide Pebble Count>20480.443.6084.1‐‐‐0.996.10168.12048>204822.62896.3212.950.6‐‐‐0.1025Box CreekC42.1953.328.923.51.921.231.71.576.30.02319.13.30.00849.93.618.80.81.734.391.33Ironwood Tributary A5a+0.03134.90.21.310.30.11350.1139‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1.197.102.54‐‐‐1.89171.41.013.61.50.04060.0334‐‐‐‐‐‐Timber Tributary B40.04174.63.78.90.70.50‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐128‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐1.12‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Coarse Sand0.260.50.911997‐‐‐‐‐‐0.493.56.548831282.750.80.69.12.1‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Medium Gravel‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐3.510.61.10.911.81.21.217.41.6‐‐‐0.01314.71.5‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐Honey Mill Mitigation SiteAppendix 4
Typical Section ValuesMin MaxTypical Section ValuesMin MaxTypical Section ValuesMin MaxTypical Section ValuesMin MaxTypical Section ValuesMin MaxTypical Section ValuesMin Maxstream typedrainage area DAsq midesign discharge Qcfsbankfull cross‐sectional areaAbkfSFaverage velocity during bankfull eventvbkffpswidth at bankfullwbkffeetmaximum depth at bankfulldmaxfeet1.7 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5mean depth at bankfulldbkffeetbankfull width to depth ratiowbkf/dbkfmax depth ratiodmax/dbkffeetbank height ratio BHR 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2floodprone area widthwfpafeet30 21 33 34 34 156 25 25 115 11 8 12 11 11 49 5 4 5entrenchment ratio ER 2.0 1.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 10+ 2.2 2.2 10+ 2.0 1.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 10+ 1.4 1.0 1.4valley slopeSvalleyfeet/ footchannel slopeSchnlfeet/ foot0.0140 0.0070 0.0210 0.0380 0.0320 0.0440 0.0340 0.0260 0.0420 0.0822 0.0820 0.1050riffle slopeSrifflefeet/ foot0.025 0.03 0.012 0.035 0.0240 0.0300 0.036 0.050 0.039 0.047 0.094 0.124riffle slope ratioSriffle/Schnl1.2 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.1 1.4 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.2pool slopeSpfeet/ foot0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0pool slope ratioSp/Schnl0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0pool‐to‐pool spacingLp‐pfeetN/A 40 57 N/A 68 116 N/A 34 52 N/A 9 44 N/A 10 42 N/A 8 18pool spacing ratioLp‐p/wbkfN/A 2.7 3.8 N/A 4.4 7.4 N/A 3.0 4.5 N/A 1.6 7.9 N/A 2.0 8.6 N/A 2.2 4.9pool cross‐sectional areaApoolSF30.2 19.6 40.9 32.0 20.8 43.3 20.5 13.3 27.8 4.8 3.1 6.5 3.6 2.3 4.9 2.3 1.5 3.1pool area ratioApool/Abkf1.85 1.2 2.5 1.85 1.2 2.5 1.85 1.2 2.5 1.85 1.2 2.5 1.85 1.2 2.5 1.85 1.2 2.5maximum pool depthdpoolfeet3.0 1.6 4.4 3.1 1.7 4.4 2.2 1.4 2.9 1.0 0.7 1.4 0.9 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.5 1.0pool depth ratiodpool/dbkf2.75 1.5 4.0 2.75 1.5 4.0 2.25 1.5 3.0 2.25 1.5 3.0 2.25 1.5 3.0 2.25 1.5 3.0pool width at bankfullwpoolfeetpool width ratiowpool/wbkfsinuosity Kbelt widthwbltfeet46 83meander width ratiowblt/wbkf2.9 5.3linear wavelength (formerly meander length)LWfeet121 161linear wavelength ratio (formerly meander length ratio)LW/wbkf7.8 10.3meander lengthLmfeet143 212meander length ratioLm/Wbkf9.2 13.6radius of curvatureRcfeet28 35radius of curvature ratioRc/ wbkf1.8 2.2N/A ‐ Does not apply to B type channels5.60.04300.974.9Proposed Geomorphic ParametersCross‐SectionSlopeProfilePatternNotation0.81B4UnitsVenable Creek Reach 2UT1830.02840.01980.02133.70.037615.01.0915.6 11.53.30.94UT3Reach 2B4UT2Reach 2Venable Creek Reach 3C43.13.9C4b0.52 0.07100.03UT6Reach 2A40.0241.22561.9452.59B416.354.617.314.8754.75211.115.01.3 1.30.02100.46 0.401.311.91.513.81.61.1114.11.50.021019.51.320.21.31.00N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A1.3N/A1.08 1.29 1.14 1.02 1.02N/A0.3312.1 12.3 11.21.5 1.5 1.50.08227.5 6.4 4.8N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AHoney Mill Mitigation SiteAppendix 4
APPENDIX 5 – Categorical Exclusion and Resource Agency Correspondence 

Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part
Project Name:
1: General Project Information
I Honey Min Mitigation Site
Count Name:
surycnunty,
EEP Number:
100083
Pro ect S Onsor:
Wldlands Engineering, Inc.
Project Contact Name:
Andrea Eckardt
Project Contact Address:
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
Project Contact E-mail:
[e-mail]
EEP Project Mana er: Kelly Phillips
Project Description
The Honey Mill Mitigation Site is a stream mitigation project located in Surry County, approximately 5 miles south 0f
Mount Airy and 7 miles northeast of Dobson. The project will include restoration and enhancement of Venable Creek
and seven unnamed tributaries which Flow to the Ararat River for a total of 5,344 cold stream credits. Historically the
site has been used for agriculture. The site is currently used primarily for open and forested cattle pasture. Cattle
have full access to all site streams resulting in extensive erosion and incision. The project will provide stream
mitigation units to the Division of Mitigation Services in the Yadkin River Basin (03040101).
M.

Part 2: All Projects
Regulation/Question Response
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county? Yes
No
2. Does the project involve ground-disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Program?
Yes
No
N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
designated as commercial or industrial?
Yes
No
N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
waste sites within the project area?
Yes
No
N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan? Yes
No
N/A
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
Historic Places in the project area?
Yes
No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur? Yes
No
N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved? Yes
No
N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act)
1. Is this a “full-delivery” project? Yes
No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate? Yes
No
N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA)
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as “territory” by the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians?
Yes
No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians? Yes
No
N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
Places?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered? Yes
No
N/A
Antiquities Act (AA)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands? Yes
No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
of antiquity?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA)
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)? Yes
No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources? Yes
No
N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required? Yes
No
N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained? Yes
No
N/A
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
listed for the county?
Yes
No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species? Yes
No
N/A
3. Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Is the project “likely to adversely affect” the species and/or “likely to adversely modify”
Designated Critical Habitat?
Yes
No
N/A
5. Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination? Yes
No
N/A
6. Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a “jeopardy” determination? Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Executive Order 13007 (Indian Sacred Sites)
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as “territory”
by the EBCI?
Yes
No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
project?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
sites?
Yes
No
N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
1. Will real estate be acquired? Yes
No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
important farmland?
Yes
No
N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS? Yes
No
N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
water body?
Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted? Yes
No
N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6(f))
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
outdoor recreation?
Yes
No
2. Has the NPS approved of the conversion? Yes
No
N/A
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Essential Fish Habitat)
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system? Yes
No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species? Yes
No
N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
project on EFH?
Yes
No
N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH? Yes
No
N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred? Yes
No
N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA? Yes
No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated? Yes
No
N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area? Yes
No
2. Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
federal agency?
Yes
No
N/A
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔





,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
ĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ
^hDDZz


,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ 
D^ηϭϬϬϬϴϯϭ
ŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͕ŽŵƉĞŶƐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ>ŝĂďŝůŝƚLJĐƚ;Z>Ϳ
dŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͕ŽŵƉĞŶƐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ>ŝĂďŝůŝƚLJĐƚ;Z>ͿƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂ
&ĞĚĞƌĂů͞^ƵƉĞƌĨƵŶĚ͟ƚŽĐůĞĂŶƵƉƵŶĐŽŶƚƌŽůůĞĚŽƌĂďĂŶĚŽŶĞĚŚĂnjĂƌĚŽƵƐͲǁĂƐƚĞƐŝƚĞƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂĐĐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕
ƐƉŝůůƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJƌĞůĞĂƐĞƐŽĨƉŽůůƵƚĂŶƚƐĂŶĚĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂŶƚƐŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘
ƐƚŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝƐĂĨƵůůͲĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͖ĂŶZZĂĚŝƵƐDĂƉZĞƉŽƌƚǁŝƚŚ'ĞŽĐŚĞĐŬǁĂƐ
ŽƌĚĞƌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂƚĂZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕/ŶĐŽŶ:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘EĞŝƚŚĞƌƚŚĞƚĂƌŐĞƚ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŶŽƌƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐǁĞƌĞůŝƐƚĞĚŝŶĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂů͕^ƚĂƚĞ͕ŽƌdƌŝďĂůĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů
ĚĂƚĂďĂƐĞƐƐĞĂƌĐŚĞĚďLJƚŚĞZ͘dŚĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƌĞǀĞĂůĞĚŶŽĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨĂŶLJ͞ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů
ĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ͟ŝŶĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƚĂƌŐĞƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͘dŚĞdžĞĐƵƚŝǀĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞZƌĞƉŽƌƚŝƐ
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘dŚĞĨƵůůƌĞƉŽƌƚŝƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝĨŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘
EĂƚŝŽŶĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĐƚ;^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϲͿ
dŚĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĐƚĚĞĐůĂƌĞƐĂŶĂƚŝŽŶĂůƉŽůŝĐLJŽĨŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ͕
ƌĞŚĂďŝůŝƚĂƚĞ͕ƌĞƐƚŽƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƌĞƵƐĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐ͕ƐŝƚĞƐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŽďũĞĐƚƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŶŵĞƌŝĐĂŶ
ĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ͕ĂƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐLJ͕ĂŶĚĐƵůƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϲŵĂŶĚĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚĨĞĚĞƌĂůĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐƚĂŬĞ
ŝŶƚŽĂĐĐŽƵŶƚƚŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚŽĨĂŶƵŶĚĞƌƚĂŬŝŶŐŽŶĂƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƚŚĂƚŝƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶ͕ŽƌŝƐĞůŝŐŝďůĞĨŽƌŝŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶŝŶ͕
ƚŚĞEĂƚŝŽŶĂůZĞŐŝƐƚĞƌŽĨ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWůĂĐĞƐ͘
tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘;tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐͿƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐ
WƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶKĨĨŝĐĞ;^,WKͿǁŝƚŚƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƚŽĂŶLJĂƌĐŚĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂůĂŶĚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞ
,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŽŶ:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘^,WKƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚŽŶ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϭϬ͕ϮϬϭϴĂŶĚƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĞLJ
ǁĞƌĞĂǁĂƌĞŽĨ͞ŶŽŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚďĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͟ĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞŶŽ
ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĐŽŵŵĞŶƚ͘ůůĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϲŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘
hŶŝĨŽƌŵZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĂŶĚZĞĂůWƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶWŽůŝĐŝĞƐĐƚ;hŶŝĨŽƌŵĐƚͿ
dŚĞƐĞĂĐƚƐ͕ĐŽůůĞĐƚŝǀĞůLJŬŶŽǁŶĂƐƚŚĞhŶŝĨŽƌŵĐƚ͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨŽƌƵŶŝĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚŽĨ
ƉĞƌƐŽŶƐĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝƌŚŽŵĞƐ͕ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ŶŽŶͲƉƌŽĨŝƚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŽƌĨĂƌŵƐďLJĨĞĚĞƌĂůĂŶĚ
ĨĞĚĞƌĂůůLJͲĂƐƐŝƐƚĞĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĂŶĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚƵŶŝĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞůĂŶĚĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͘
,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝƐĂĨƵůůͲĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐůĂŶĚĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ͘EŽƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĨĂŝƌ
ŵĂƌŬĞƚǀĂůƵĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂĐŬŽĨĐŽŶĚĞŵŶĂƚŝŽŶĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJďLJtŝůĚůĂŶĚƐǁĂƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ
ŝŶƚŚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚKƉƚŝŽŶŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJ͘ĐŽƉLJŽĨƚŚĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƐĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞKƉƚŝŽŶ
ŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘
ŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐĐƚ;^Ϳ
^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϳŽĨƚŚĞ^ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĨĞĚĞƌĂůĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐ͕ŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂŶĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞ
^ĞĐƌĞƚĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌŽƌŽĨŽŵŵĞƌĐĞ͕ĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͕ƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĞLJĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞ͕ĨƵŶĚŽƌ
ĐĂƌƌLJŽƵƚĂƌĞŶŽƚůŝŬĞůLJƚŽũĞŽƉĂƌĚŝnjĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚĞdžŝƐƚĞŶĐĞŽĨƚŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚŽƌĞŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŽƌ
ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƌĂĚǀĞƌƐĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůŚĂďŝƚĂƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘
dŚĞ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJůŝƐƚĞĚƚŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚĂŶĚĞŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚĞƌŶůŽŶŐͲĞĂƌĞĚďĂƚ;E>Ϳ
;DLJŽƚŝƐƐĞƉƚĞŶƚƌŝŽŶĂůŝƐͿ͕ƚŚĞďŽŐƚƵƌƚůĞ;'ůLJƉƚĞŵLJƐŵƵŚůĞŶďĞƌŐŝŝͿ͕^ĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnj͛ƐƐƵŶĨůŽǁĞƌ;,ĞůŝĂŶƚŚƵƐ
ƐĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnjŝŝͿ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŵĂůůǁŚŽƌůĞĚƉŽŐŽŶŝĂ;/ƐŽƚƌŝĂŵĞĚĞŽůŽŝĚĞƐͿ͘dŚĞh^&t^ĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJůŝƐƚ
ĂŶLJƌŝƚŝĐĂů,ĂďŝƚĂƚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂůůLJͲůŝƐƚĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJŶŽƌĂƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĂŶLJ
ŬŶŽǁŶŽĐĐƵƌƌĞŶĐĞƐŽĨƚŚĞE>ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ
;ŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĨǁƐ͘ŐŽǀͬĂƐŚĞǀŝůůĞͬŚƚŵůƐͬƉƌŽũĞĐƚͺƌĞǀŝĞǁͬE>ͺŝŶͺtE͘ŚƚŵůͿ͘dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐϳϬŵŝůĞƐ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŶĞĂƌĞƐƚŬŶŽǁŶŚŝďĞƌŶĂĐƵůƵŵĨŽƌƚŚĞE>͘

,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ 
D^ηϭϬϬϬϴϯϮ
ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐƵƌǀĞLJ͕ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚŽŶƵŐƵƐƚϯϭ͕ϮϬϭϴ͕ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŚĂďŝƚĂƚĨŽƌ
ƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚĞƌŶůŽŶŐͲĞĂƌĞĚďĂƚ͕ƚŚĞďŽŐƚƵƌƚůĞ͕ĂŶĚ^ĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnj͛ƐƐƵŶĨůŽǁĞƌ͘dŚĞƌĞǁĂƐŶŽƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŚĂďŝƚĂƚ
ŽŶƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƐŵĂůůǁŚŽƌůĞĚƉŽŐŽŶŝĂ͘EŽŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐƉĞĐŝĞƐǁĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞĨŽƌĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞ
ĨŽƵƌůŝƐƚĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘
ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞĂďƐĞŶĐĞŽĨŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŽŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚďLJtŝůĚůĂŶĚƐƚŽ
ŚĂǀĞ͞ŶŽĞĨĨĞĐƚ͟ŽŶƚŚĞ^ĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnj͛ƐƐƵŶĨůŽǁĞƌĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŵĂůůǁŚŽƌůĞĚƉŽŐŽŶŝĂ͘tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚ
ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͞ŵĂLJĂĨĨĞĐƚďƵƚŝƐŶŽƚůŝŬĞůLJƚŽĂĚǀĞƌƐĞůLJĂĨĨĞĐƚ͟ƚŚĞďŽŐƚƵƌƚůĞ͕ďƵƚďĞĐĂƵƐĞŝƚŝƐůŝƐƚĞĚĂƐ
ƚŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƐŝŵŝůĂƌŝƚLJŽĨĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͕ŝƚŝƐŶŽƚƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϳĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
&ŽƌĞƐƚĞĚŚĂďŝƚĂƚƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐƚƌĞĞƐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϯͲŝŶĐŚĚďŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŚĂďŝƚĂƚĨŽƌ
E>͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞĚĞĐůŝŶĞŽĨƚŚĞE>ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵƚŚĞtŚŝƚĞEŽƐĞĚ^LJŶĚƌŽŵĞ;tE^Ϳ͕ƚŚĞh^&ŝƐŚ
ĂŶĚtŝůĚůŝĨĞ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ;h^&t^ͿŚĂƐŝƐƐƵĞĚƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƐƉĞĐŝĂůƌƵůĞƵŶĚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϰ;ĚͿŽĨƚŚĞ^ƚŽ
ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐƚŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞE>ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƉƵƌƉŽƐĞĨƵůĂŶĚŝŶĐŝĚĞŶƚĂůƚĂŬĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŽĐĐƵƌƌĞŶĐĞ
ŽĨtE^͘ĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂtE^njŽŶĞĂŶĚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞƌĞŵŽǀĂůͬĐůĞĂƌŝŶŐŽĨƚƌĞĞƐ͕
ŝƚŝƐƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůϰ;ĚͿƌƵůŝŶŐ͘ƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨEEĂƚƵƌĂů,ĞƌŝƚĂŐĞWƌŽŐƌĂŵƌĞĐŽƌĚƐĚŝĚŶŽƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞ
ĂŶLJŬŶŽǁŶE>ƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶϮ͘ϬŵŝůĞŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƵĚLJĂƌĞĂ͖ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĞůŝŐŝďůĞƚŽƵƐĞ
ƚŚĞE>ϰ;ĚͿZƵůĞ^ƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ&ŽƌŵƚŽŵĞĞƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϳ;ĂͿ;ϮͿ
ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞϰ;ĚͿĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚϰ;ĚͿŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ&ŽƌŵǁĂƐƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞh^&t^ďLJ
ƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽŶ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘
dŽŵĞĞƚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂůĞƚƚĞƌƌĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŵŵĞŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞh^&t^ǁĂƐƐĞŶƚŽŶ:ƵůLJϮϬ͕
ϮϬϭϴ͘EŽƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞh^&t^ǁĂƐƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞϯϬͲĚĂLJƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƉĞƌŝŽĚ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƚŚĞ
ƐŝŐŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞE>ϰ;ĚͿZƵůĞ^ƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ&ŽƌŵďLJƚŚĞ&,tĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ
ŵĂLJĂĨĨĞĐƚƚŚĞE>͕ďƵƚƚŚĂƚĂŶLJƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐŝŶĐŝĚĞŶƚĂůƚĂŬĞŽĨƚŚĞE>ŝƐŶŽƚƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůϰ;ĚͿ
ƌƵůĞ͘&,tƐŝŐŶĞĚϰ;ĚͿĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŵĂŶĚƚŚĞĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚŝƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ
ĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘
&ĂƌŵůĂŶĚWƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶWŽůŝĐLJĐƚ;&WWͿ
dŚĞ&WWƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĂƚ͕ďĞĨŽƌĞƚĂŬŝŶŐŽƌĂƉƉƌŽǀŝŶŐĂŶLJĨĞĚĞƌĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨ
ĨĂƌŵůĂŶĚ͕ƚŚĞĂŐĞŶĐLJŵƵƐƚĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƚŚĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĂĐƚŝŽŶƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ&WW͕ĂŶĚ͕
ŝĨƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂĚǀĞƌƐĞĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͕ŵƵƐƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƚŽůĞƐƐĞŶƚŚĞŵ͘
dŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞĐŽŶǀĞƌƐŝŽŶŽĨƉƌŝŵĞĨĂƌŵůĂŶĚ͘ƐƐƵĐŚ͕&ŽƌŵͲϭϬϬϲŚĂƐ
ďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚĂŶĚƐƵďŵŝƚƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞEĂƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŶƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ;EZ^Ϳ͘dŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ
ĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚŝŶŐŝƚƐƐƵďŵŝƚƚĂůŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘
&ŝƐŚĂŶĚtŝůĚůŝĨĞŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶĐƚ;&tͿ
dŚĞ&tƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞh^&t^ĂŶĚƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƐƚĂƚĞǁŝůĚůŝĨĞĂŐĞŶĐLJŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
ƚŚĂƚĂůƚĞƌŽƌŵŽĚŝĨLJĂǁĂƚĞƌďŽĚLJ͘ZĞƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJƚŚĞƐĞĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚ
ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐŽŶǁŝůĚůŝĨĞĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂLJďĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƚŽƉƌĞǀĞŶƚůŽƐƐŽƌĚĂŵĂŐĞƚŽ
ǁŝůĚůŝĨĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘
tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĨƌŽŵďŽƚŚƚŚĞh^&t^ĂŶĚƚŚĞEŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂtŝůĚůŝĨĞ
ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ;EtZͿŽŶ:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘EtZƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚŽŶƵŐƵƐƚϴ͕ϮϬϭϴĂŶĚƐƚĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚ
ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚ͞ŶŽƚŝŵƉĂĐƚǁŝůĚƚƌŽƵƚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘͟h^&t^ŚĂƐŶŽƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚĂƚƚŚŝƐƚŝŵĞ͘ůů
ĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƚǁŽĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘

,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ 
D^ηϭϬϬϬϴϯϯ
DŝŐƌĂƚŽƌLJŝƌĚdƌĞĂƚLJĐƚ;DdͿ
dŚĞDdŵĂŬĞƐŝƚƵŶůĂǁĨƵůĨŽƌĂŶLJŽŶĞƚŽŬŝůů͕ĐĂƉƚƵƌĞ͕ĐŽůůĞĐƚ͕ƉŽƐƐĞƐƐ͕ďƵLJ͕ƐĞůů͕ƚƌĂĚĞ͕ƐŚŝƉ͕ŝŵƉŽƌƚ͕Žƌ
ĞdžƉŽƌƚĂŶLJŵŝŐƌĂƚŽƌLJďŝƌĚ͘dŚĞŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚŬŝůůŝŶŐŽĨďŝƌĚƐďLJĚĞƐƚƌŽLJŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌŶĞƐƚƐĂŶĚĞŐŐƐŝƐĐŽǀĞƌĞĚďLJ
ƚŚĞDd͕ƐŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŶŶĞƐƚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂƐĚƵƌŝŶŐŶĞƐƚŝŶŐƐĞĂƐŽŶƐĐĂŶĐŽŶƐƚŝƚƵƚĞĂƚĂŬŝŶŐ͘
tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞh^&t^ŝŶƌĞŐĂƌĚƐƚŽ
ŵŝŐƌĂƚŽƌLJďŝƌĚƐŽŶ:ƵŶĞϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ͘dŚĞh^&t^ŚĂƐŶŽƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞĚĂƚƚŚŝƐƚŝŵĞ͘ůůĐŽƌƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ
h^&t^ŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƉƉĞŶĚŝdž͘







,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
ĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ
WWE/y
FORM-LBD-CCA
®kcehCoeGhtiwtropeR™paMsuidaRRDEehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Venable Farm Road
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Inquiry Number: 5376953.2s
July 30, 2018
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC5376953.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5376953.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
VENABLE FARM ROAD
MOUNT AIRY, NC 27030
COORDINATES
36.4300000 - 36˚ 25’ 48.00’’Latitude (North):
80.6110000 - 80˚ 36’ 39.60’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
534869.2UTM X (Meters):
4031512.0UTM Y (Meters):
1048 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
6045899 MOUNT AIRY SOUTH, NCTarget Property Map:
2014Version Date:
5947705 DOBSON, NCWest Map:
2013Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140524Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
5376953.2s Page 2
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
VENABLE FARM ROAD
MOUNT AIRY, NC 27030
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5376953.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
TC5376953.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
TC5376953.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAOP
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
TC5376953.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST
0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5376953.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NO SITES FOUND
TC5376953.2s Page 8
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
Count: 0 records.
NO SITES FOUND
TC5376953.2s Page 9


tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘;WͿϳϬϰ͘ϯϯϮ͘ϳϳϱϰͻϭϰϯϬ^ŽƵƚŚDŝŶƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϰͻŚĂƌůŽƚƚĞ͕EϮϴϮϬϯ

:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ

ZĞŶĞĞ'ůĞĚŚŝůůͲĂƌůĞLJ
^ƚĂƚĞ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶKĨĨŝĐĞ
ϰϲϭϳDĂŝů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĞŶƚĞƌ
ZĂůĞŝŐŚ͕EϮϳϲϵϵͲϰϲϭϳ


^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
  ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕EŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂ  


ĞĂƌDƐ͘'ůĞĚŚŝůůͲĂƌůĞLJ͕

tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶĂŶLJƉŽƐƐŝďůĞŝƐƐƵĞƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚĞŵĞƌŐĞ
ǁŝƚŚƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƚŽĂƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂůŽƌĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ͕Ă
ƐƚƌĞĂŵŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƚĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕E͘h^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉĂŶĚĂŶKǀĞƌǀŝĞǁ^ŝƚĞDĂƉ
ƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĞŶĐůŽƐĞĚ͘dŚĞƚŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĨŝŐƵƌĞǁĂƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
DŽƵŶƚŝƌLJ^ŽƵƚŚ͕ϳ͘ϱͲDŝŶƵƚĞh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐYƵĂĚƌĂŶŐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚůĂƚŝƚƵĚĞ
ϯϲ͘ϰϮϵϳϵϴ͕ůŽŶŐŝƚƵĚĞͲϴϬ͘ϲϭϬϲϰϭ͘

dŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝƐďĞŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞƐƚƌĞĂŵ
ĐŚĂŶŶĞůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨsĞŶĂďůĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚ
ƐĞǀĞŶƵŶŶĂŵĞĚƚƌŝďƵƚĂƌŝĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂůůĨůŽǁƚŽƌĂƌĂƚZŝǀĞƌ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĐŚĂŶŶĞůŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ
ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůLJĚĞŐƌĂĚĞĚ͕ƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJĚƵĞƚŽŝƚƐƵƐĞĂƐĐĂƚƚůĞƉĂƐƚƵƌĞ͘ĂƚƚůĞŚĂǀĞĨƵůůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
ƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƐǁŚŝĐŚŚĂƐƌĞƐƵůƚĞĚŝŶĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞĞƌŽƐŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĐŝƐŝŽŶ͘,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůLJ͕ƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŚĂƐďĞĞŶŝŶĂĐƚŝǀĞ
ĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŽǀĞƌϲϬLJĞĂƌƐ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌŵŽƌĞ͕ŶŽĂƌĐŚĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂůĂƌƚŝĨĂĐƚƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŽďƐĞƌǀĞĚŽƌ
ŶŽƚĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌLJƐƵƌǀĞLJƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞĨŽƌƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ͘

tĞĂƐŬƚŚĂƚLJŽƵƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŚŝƐƐŝƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽĨĂŶLJ
ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ͘

tĞƚŚĂŶŬLJŽƵŝŶĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĨŽƌLJŽƵƌƚŝŵĞůLJƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞĂŶĚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘WůĞĂƐĞĨĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚƵƐǁŝƚŚ
ĂŶLJƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚLJŽƵŵĂLJŚĂǀĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘

^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕

dĂƐŚĂ<ŝŶŐ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ĐŝĞŶƚŝƐƚ

ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗
&ŝŐƵƌĞϭ^ŝƚĞDĂƉ
&ŝŐƵƌĞϮh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉ

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

September 10, 2018

Tasha King
Wildlands Engineering
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203

Re: Honey Mill Mitigation Site, Surry County, ER 18-2061

Dear Ms. King:
Thank you for your letter of July 30, 2018, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.

The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.

Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
[e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona M. Bartos

3.9 Value of Conservation Easement; No Power of Eminent Domain. In accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Buyer hereby notifies Seller that: (i) Buyer
believes that the fair market value of the Conservation Easement is an amount equal to the Purchase Price; and (ii)
Buyer does not have the power of eminent domain.
3.10 Modification; Waiver. No amendment of this agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and
signed by the parties. No waiver of satisfaction of a condition or failure to comply with an obligation under this
agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver, and no such waiver will
constitute a waiver of satisfaction of any other condition or failure to comply with any other obligation.
3.11 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other to interpret or enforce any of the
terms of this agreement or because of the breach by the other party of any of the terms of this agreement, the losing
party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, court costs, litigation costs and any other
expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or defense of such action, whether or not the action is prosecuted
to a final judgment.
3.12 Memorandum of Option Agreement. Concurrently with the signing of this agreement, Buyer and Seller
agree to sign a Memorandum of Option that will be recorded against the Property in the Register of Deeds in the County
stated in paragraph A within five days after the Effective Date.
3.13 Tax Deferred Exchange. If Seller desires to implement a tax -deferred exchange (the "Exchange") in
connection with Buyer's purchase of the Conservation Easement, the parties agree to cooperate in affecting the
Exchange. Seller is responsible for all additional costs associated with the Exchange and Buyer shall not have any
additional liability with respect to the Exchange. The parties will execute any additional documents required for the
Exchange at no cost to Buyer.
3.14 Brokers. Shawn D. Wilkerson and Robert W. Bugg are North Carolina Real Estate Brokers. Neither
Buyer nor Seller has incurred any liability for any brokerage fee, commission or finder's fee in connection with this
agreement or the transactions contemplated by this agreement.
3.15 Entire Agreement. Each party acknowledges they are not relying on any statements made by the other
party, other than in this agreement, regarding the subject matter of this agreement, Neither party will have a basis for
bringing any claim for fraud in connection with any such statements.
3.16 Mutual Agreement. This is a mutually negotiated agreement and regardless of which party was more
responsible for its preparation, this agreement shall be construed neutrally between the parties.
3.17 Governing taw. The laws of the State of North Carolina, without giving effect to its principles of
conflicts of law, govern all matters arising out of this agreement.
3.18 Counterparts. This agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which, together, constitute one and the same instrument. A signed copy of this agreement delivered
by electronic mail in portable document format (".pdf" format) shall have the same legal effect as delivery of an original
signed copy of this agreement.
[Signature Page Below]
7
3-13-18 RWB
Buyer
Seller

Seller shall work together to identify the best location for the final route and to decide if the route shall remain after
construction of the project or not. Buyer shall leave the Construction Access Route in equal or better condition than it
existed prior to the start of construction activities, This paragraph survives Closing.
3.5 Liquidated Damages. Buyer recognizes that the Project Area will be removed by Seller from the market
during the term of the agreement. If the purchase of the Conservation Easement is not consummated due to Buyer's
default, the parties have determined and agreed that the actual amount of damages that would he suffered by Seller as
a result of that default would be very difficult or impracticable to estimate on the date of this agreement. As a result,
the parties agree that the Option Consideration as of the date of Buyer's default is sufficient to cover any estimated
damages that may be incurred by Seller. For these reasons, the parties agree that if the purchase of the Conservation
Easement is not consummated because of Buyer's default, Seller may retain the Option Consideration paid by Buyer as
of the date of Buyer's default as its sole remedy, and Seller waives any and all right to seek other rights or remedies
against Buyer, including without limitation, specific performance. Nothing stated in this paragraph shall preclude any
action under any indemnification or defense provision in this agreement, nor for the award of attorney's fees and costs
in conjunction with any action relating to this agreement.
3.6 Notices. All notices required by this agreement shall be in writing, shall be given only in accordance with
the provisions of this Section, shall be addressed to the Parties in the manner stated below, and shall be conclusively
deemed properly delivered: (a) upon receipt when hand delivered during normal business hours; (b) upon the day of
delivery if the notice has been deposited in an authorized receptacle of the United States Postal Service as first-class,
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, with a return receipt requested; (c) one business day after the notice has
been deposited with either FedEx or United Parcel Service to be delivered by overnight delivery; or (d) if sent by email,
upon receipt of an acknowledgement email sent to the sender's email address in which the party receiving the email
notice acknowledges having received that email. An automatic "read receipt" is not acknowledgement for purposes of
this section 3.3. The addresses of the parties to receive notices are as follows:
TO BUYER: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Attention: Robert W. Bugg
e-mail: [e-mail]
TO SELLER: LuAnn Venable Browne
929 Siloam Road
Mt. Airy, NC 27030
e-mail: [e-mail]
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this paragraph,
3.7 Assignment. Buyer has the right to assign this agreement without the consent of Seller. No assignment
shall be effective unless the assignee has delivered to Seller a written assumption of Buyer's obligations under this
agreement. Seller hereby releases Buyer from any obligations under this agreement arising after the effective date of
any assignment of this agreement by Buyer.
3.8 Value of Conservation Easement; No Power of Eminent Domain. In accordance with the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Buyer hereby notifies Seller that: (i) Buyer
Buyer 3-13-18 RWB
Seller Seller Seller

believes that the fair market value of the Conservation Easement is an amount equal to the Purchase Price; and (H)
Buyer does not have the power of eminent domain.
3.9 Modification; Waiver. No amendment of this agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and
signed by the parties. No waiver of satisfaction of a condition or failure to comply with an obligation under this
agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party granting the waiver, and no such waiver will
constitute a waiver of satisfaction of any other condition or failure to comply with any other obligation.
3.10 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other to interpret or enforce any of the
terms of this agreement or because of the breach by the other party of any of the terms of this agreement, the losing
party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorneys' fees, expenses, court costs, litigation costs and any other
expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or defense of such action, whether or not the action is prosecuted
to a final judgment.
3.11 Memorandum of Option Agreement. Concurrently with the signing of this agreement, Buyer and Seller
agree to sign a Memorandum of Option that will be recorded against the Property in the Register of Deeds in the County
stated in paragraph A within five days after the Effective Date,
3.12 Tax Deferred Exchange, If Seller desires to implement a tax -deferred exchange (the "Exchange") in
connection with Buyer's purchase of the Conservation Easement, the parties agree to cooperate in affecting the
Exchange. Seller is responsible for all additional costs associated with the Exchange and Buyer shall not have any
additional liability with respect to the Exchange. The parties will execute any additional documents required for the
Exchange at no cost to Buyer.
3.13 Brokers. Shawn D. Wilkerson and Robert W. Bugg are North Carolina Real Estate Brokers, Neither
Buyer nor Seller has incurred any liability for any brokerage fee, commission or finder's fee in connection with this
agreement or the transactions contemplated by this agreement.
3.14 Entire Agreement. Each party acknowledges they are not relying on any statements made by the other
party, other than in this agreement, regarding the subject matter of this agreement. Neither party will have a basis for
bringing any claim for fraud in connection with any such statements.
3.15 Mutual Agreement. This is a mutually negotiated agreement and regardless of which party was more
responsible for its preparation, this agreement shall be construed neutrally between the parties.
3.16 Governing Law. The laws of the State of North Carolina, without giving effect to its principles of
conflicts of law, govern all matters arising out of this agreement.
3.17 Counterparts. This agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which, together, constitute one and the same instrument. A signed copy of this agreement delivered
by electronic mail in portable document format (",pdf" format) shall have the same legal effect as delivery of an original
signed copy of this agreement.
(Signature Page Below]
Buyer 3-13-18 RWB
I I sy
Seller Seller



tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘;WͿϳϬϰ͘ϯϯϮ͘ϳϳϱϰͻϭϰϯϬ^ŽƵƚŚDŝŶƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϰͻŚĂƌůŽƚƚĞ͕EϮϴϮϬϯ
:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ

DĂƌĞůůĂƵŶĐŝĐŬ
h^&ŝƐŚĂŶĚtŝůĚůŝĨĞ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ
ƐŚĞǀŝůůĞ&ŝĞůĚKĨĨŝĐĞ
ϭϲϬŝůůŝĐŽĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ
ƐŚĞǀŝůůĞ͕EϮϴϴϬϭ

^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
  ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕EŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂ

ĞĂƌDƐ͘ƵŶĐŝĐŬ͕

tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶĂŶLJƉŽƐƐŝďůĞŝƐƐƵĞƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚĞŵĞƌŐĞǁŝƚŚ
ƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƚŽĞŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͕ŵŝŐƌĂƚŽƌLJďŝƌĚƐ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƚƌƵƐƚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ,ŽŶĞLJ
DŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ͕ĂƐƚƌĞĂŵŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƚĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕E͘h^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉĂŶĚ
ĂŶKǀĞƌǀŝĞǁ^ŝƚĞDĂƉƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĞŶĐůŽƐĞĚ͘dŚĞƚŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĨŝŐƵƌĞǁĂƐ
ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞDŽƵŶƚŝƌLJ^ŽƵƚŚ͕ϳ͘ϱͲDŝŶƵƚĞh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐYƵĂĚƌĂŶŐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚ
ůĂƚŝƚƵĚĞϯϲ͘ϰϮϵϳϵϴ͕ůŽŶŐŝƚƵĚĞͲϴϬ͘ϲϭϬϲϰϭ͘

dŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝƐďĞŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞƐƚƌĞĂŵ
ĐŚĂŶŶĞůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨsĞŶĂďůĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚ
ƐĞǀĞŶƵŶŶĂŵĞĚƚƌŝďƵƚĂƌŝĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂůůĨůŽǁƚŽƌĂƌĂƚZŝǀĞƌ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĐŚĂŶŶĞůŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ
ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůLJĚĞŐƌĂĚĞĚ͕ƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJĚƵĞƚŽŝƚƐƵƐĞĂƐĐĂƚƚůĞƉĂƐƚƵƌĞ͘ĂƚƚůĞŚĂǀĞĨƵůůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
ƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƐǁŚŝĐŚŚĂƐƌĞƐƵůƚĞĚŝŶĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞĞƌŽƐŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĐŝƐŝŽŶ͘

ĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽLJŽƵƌǁĞďƐŝƚĞ;ŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĨǁƐ͘ŐŽǀͬƌĂůĞŝŐŚͬƐƉĞĐŝĞƐͬĐŶƚLJůŝƐƚͬƐƵƌƌLJ͘ŚƚŵůͿƚŚĞƚŚƌĞĂƚĞŶĞĚŽƌ
ĞŶĚĂŶŐĞƌĞĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĨŽƌ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJĂƌĞ͗ƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶůŽŶŐͲĞĂƌĞĚďĂƚ;DLJŽƚŝƐƐĞƉƚĞŶƚƌŝŽŶĂůŝƐͿ͕ƚŚĞďŽŐƚƵƌƚůĞ
;'ůLJƉƚĞŵLJƐŵƵŚůĞŶďĞƌŐŝŝͿ͕^ĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnj͛ƐƐƵŶĨůŽǁĞƌ;,ĞůŝĂŶƚŚƵƐƐĐŚǁĞŝŶŝƚnjŝŝͿ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŵĂůůǁŚŽƌůĞĚƉŽŐŽŶŝĂ
;/ƐŽƚƌŝĂŵĞĚĞŽůŽŝĚĞƐͿ͘

/ĨǁĞŚĂǀĞŶŽƚŚĞĂƌĚĨƌŽŵLJŽƵŝŶϯϬĚĂLJƐ͕ǁĞǁŝůůĂƐƐƵŵĞƚŚĂƚLJŽƵĚŽŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂŶLJĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐ
ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚůĂǁƐĂŶĚƚŚĂƚLJŽƵĚŽŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂŶLJŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƚŽƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƚƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƚŝŵĞ͘

tĞƚŚĂŶŬLJŽƵŝŶĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĨŽƌLJŽƵƌƚŝŵĞůLJƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞĂŶĚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘WůĞĂƐĞĨĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚƵƐǁŝƚŚĂŶLJ
ƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚLJŽƵŵĂLJŚĂǀĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘

^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕

dĂƐŚĂ<ŝŶŐ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ĐŝĞŶƚŝƐƚ

ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗
&ŝŐƵƌĞϭ^ŝƚĞDĂƉ
&ŝŐƵƌĞϮh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉ

$QGUHD(FNDUGW
)URP%UHZ'RQQLH)+:$'RQQLH%UHZ#GRWJRY!
6HQW7KXUVGD\6HSWHPEHU30
7R0DUHOODB%XQFLFN#IZVJRY
&F$QGUHD(FNDUGW3KLOOLSV.HOO\'
6XEMHFW+RQH\0LOOVLWH'06BPLWLJDWLRQSURMHFWB6XUU\&RXQW\B1/(%GUXOHFRQVXOWDWLRQ
$WWDFKPHQWV1/(%GUXOHVWUHDPOLQHGFRQVXOWDWLRQIRUP+RQH\0LOOVLWHSGI+RQH\0LOO)LJXUH6LWH
0DSSGI+RQH\0LOO)LJXUH7RSR0DSSGI+RQH\0LOO)LJXUH&RQFHSW0DSIRU1/(%SGI
'ŽŽĚĂĨƚĞƌŶŽŽŶDĂƌĞůůĂ͕

dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚŝƐŵĞƐƐĂŐĞŝƐƚŽŶŽƚŝĨLJLJŽƵƌŽĨĨŝĐĞƚŚĂƚ&,tǁŝůůƵƐĞƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶ
ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌƚŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝŶ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕E͘

ƚƚĂĐŚĞĚŝƐĂĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚE>ϰ;ĚͿZƵůĞ^ƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŵ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƐŝƚĞŵĂƉƐͬĨŝŐƵƌĞƐ͘

dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŐƌĞĂƚĂĨƚĞƌŶŽŽŶ͕

ŽŶŶŝĞ


Notifying the Service Under the Framework
Northern Long-Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form
Federal agencies (or designated non-federal representatives) should use the Northern Long-Eared Bat
4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation form to notify the Service of their project and meet the
requirements of the framework.
Northern Long-Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form (Word document)
Information requested in the Northern Long-Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form serves
to
(1) notify the field office that an action agency will use the streamlined framework;
(2) describe the project with sufficient detail to support the required determination; and
(3) enable the USFWS to track effects and determine if reinitiation of consultation for the
4(d) rule is required. This form requests the minimum amount of information required for
the Service to be able to track this information.
Providing information in the Streamlined Consultation Form does not address section 7(a)(2)
compliance for any other listed species.


ŽŶŶŝĞƌĞǁ
WƌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶΘŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
&ĞĚĞƌĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ

ϯϭϬEĞǁĞƌŶǀĞ͕^ƵŝƚĞϰϭϬ
ZĂůĞŝŐŚ͕EϮϳϲϬϭ
ĚŽŶŶŝĞ͘ďƌĞǁΛĚŽƚ͘ŐŽǀ
ϵϭϵͲϳϰϳͲϳϬϭϳ


ΎΎΎWůĞĂƐĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚďĞĨŽƌĞƉƌŝŶƚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐĞŵĂŝů͘ΎΎΎ


Northern Long-Eared Bat 4(d) Rule Streamlined Consultation Form
Federal agencies should use this form for the optional streamlined consultation framework for the northern long-
eared bat (NLEB). This framework allows federal agencies to rely upon the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
(USFWS) January 5, 2016, intra-Service Programmatic Biological Opinion (BO) on the final 4(d) rule for the
NLEB for section 7(a)(2) compliance by: (1) notifying the USFWS that an action agency will use the streamlined
framework; (2) describing the project with sufficient detail to support the required determination; and (3) enabling
the USFWS to track effects and determine if reinitiation of consultation is required per 50 CFR 402.16.
This form is not necessary if an agency determines that a proposed action will have no effect to the NLEB or if
the USFWS has concurred in writing with an agency's determination that a proposed action may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect the NLEB (i.e., the standard informal consultation process). Actions that may cause
prohibited incidental take require separate formal consultation. Providing this information does not address
section 7(a)(2) compliance for any other listed species.
Information to Determine 4(d) Rule Compliance:YES NO
1. Does the project occur wholly outside of the WNS Zone
1?܆ ܈
2. Have you contacted the appropriate agency
2 to determine if your project is near
known hibernacula or maternity roost trees?
܈ ܆
3. Could the project disturb hibernating NLEBs in a known hibernaculum? ܆ ܈
4. Could the project alter the entrance or interior environment of a known
hibernaculum?
܆ ܈
5. Does the project remove any trees within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at
any time of year?܆ ܈
6. Would the project cut or destroy known occupied maternity roost trees, or any
other trees within a 150-foot radius from the maternity roost tree from June 1
through July 31.
܆ ܈
You are eligible to use this form if you have answered yes to question #1 or yes to question #2 and no to
questions 3, 4, 5 and 6. The remainder of the form will be used by the USFWS to track our assumptions in the
BO.
Agency and Applicant
3 (Name, Email, Phone No.): FHWA, Donnie Brew, [e-mail],
919-747-7017
Project Name: Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Project Location (include coordinates if known): 36°25’47.3"N 80°36’38.3"W
Basic Project Description (provide narrative below or attach additional information):
The Honey Mill Mitigation Site is a stream mitigation project located in Surry County, approximately 5 miles south of Mount
Airy and 7 miles northeast of Dobson. The project will include restoration and enhancement of Venable Creek and multiple
unnamed tributaries which flow to the Ararat River for a total of 5,344 cold stream credits. Historically the site has been used
for agriculture. The site is currently used primarily for open and forested cattle pasture. Cattle have full access to all site
streams resulting in extensive erosion and incision. The project will provide stream mitigation units to the Division of

1 http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/WNSZone.pdf
2 See http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/nhisites.html
3 If applicable - only needed for federal actions with applicants (e.g., for a permit, etc.) who are party to the consultation.
Mitigation Services in the Yadkin river Basin (03040101). Construction of the stream restoration project will include some
tree removal (>3"DBH) — approximately 4.2 acres.
General Project Information
YES NO
Does the project occur within 0.25 miles of a known hibennaculum?
❑
Does the project occur within 150 feet of a known maternity roost tree?
❑
Does the project include forest conversions? (if yes, report acreage below)
Estimated total acres of forest conversion
4.2 ac
If known, estimated acres` of forest conversion from A priI I to October 31
4.2 ac
If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 31 h
Does the project include timber harvest? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of timber harvest
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31
If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June I to Jul y 31
Does the project include prescribed fire? (if yes, report acreage below)
❑
Estimated total acres of prescribed fire
If known, estimated acres.of prescribed lire from April I to October 3I
If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June I to J u ly 31
Does the project instalI new wind turbines? (if yes, report capacity in MW below)
❑
Estimated wind capacity M W
Agency Determination:
By signing this form, the action agency determines that this project may affect the NLEB, but that any
resulting incidental take of the NLEB is not prohibited by the final 4(d) rule.
If the USFWS does not respond within 30 days from submittal of this form, the action agency may
presume that its determination is informed by the best available information and that its project
responsihiIities under 7(a)(2) with respect to the NLEB are fulfIIed through the USFWS January 5,
2016, Programmatic BO. 'The action agency will update this determination annually for multi -year
activities.
The action agency understands that the USFWS presumes that al[ activities are implemented as
described herein. The action agency will promptly report any departures from the described activities to
the appropriate USFWS Field Office. The action agency will provide the appropriate USFWS Field
Office with the results of any surveys conducted for the NLEB. Involved parties will promptly notify the
appropriate USFWS Field Office upon finding a dead, injured, or sick NLEB.
i
Signature:-�
Date Submitted_ 9- z 0 - /P
° Any activity that temporarily or permanently removes suitable forested habitat, including. but not limited to, tree removal
from development, energy production and transmission, mining, agriculture. etc. (see page 48 of the BO).
1 f the project removes less than 10 trees and the acreage is unknown, report the acreage as less than 0.1 acre.
If the activity includes tree clearing, in June and July, also include those acreage in April to October.

86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH
)$50/$1'&219(56,21,03$&75$7,1*
3$57,(To be completed by Federal Agency)'DWH2I/DQG(YDOXDWLRQ5HTXHVW
1DPH2I3URMHFW )HGHUDO$JHQF\,QYROYHG
3URSRVHG/DQG8VH &RXQW\$QG6WDWH
3$57,,(To be completed by NRCS)'DWH5HTXHVW5HFHLYHG%\15&6
'RHVWKHVLWHFRQWDLQSULPHXQLTXHVWDWHZLGHRUORFDOLPSRUWDQWIDUPODQG"
(If no, the FPPA does not apply -- do not complete additional parts of this form).
$FUHV,UULJDWHG $YHUDJH)DUP6L]H
0DMRU&URS(s))DUPDEOH/DQG,Q*RYW-XULVGLFWLRQ $PRXQW2I)DUPODQG$V'HILQHGLQ)33$
1DPH2I/DQG(YDOXDWLRQ6\VWHP8VHG 1DPH2I/RFDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW6\VWHP 'DWH/DQG(YDOXDWLRQ5HWXUQHG%\15&6
<HV1R
$FUHV$FUHV
3$57,,,(To be completed by Federal Agency)$OWHUQDWLYH6LWH5DWLQJ
6LWH$6LWH%6LWH&6LWH'
$ 7RWDO$FUHV7R%H&RQYHUWHG'LUHFWO\
%7RWDO$FUHV7R%H&RQYHUWHG,QGLUHFWO\
&7RWDO$FUHV,Q6LWH
3$57,9 (To be completed by NRCS)/DQG(YDOXDWLRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ
$7RWDO$FUHV3ULPH$QG8QLTXH)DUPODQG
%7RWDO$FUHV6WDWHZLGH$QG/RFDO,PSRUWDQW)DUPODQG
&3HUFHQWDJH2I)DUPODQG,Q&RXQW\2U/RFDO*RYW8QLW7R%H&RQYHUWHG
'3HUFHQWDJH2I)DUPODQG,Q*RYW-XULVGLFWLRQ:LWK6DPH2U+LJKHU5HODWLYH9DOXH
3$579 (To be completed by NRCS)/DQG(YDOXDWLRQ&ULWHULRQ
5HODWLYH9DOXH2I)DUPODQG7R%H&RQYHUWHG(Scale of 0 to 100 Points)
3$579, (To be completed by Federal Agency)
6LWH$VVHVVPHQW&ULWHULD(These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(b)
0D[LPXP
3RLQWV
 $UHD,Q1RQXUEDQ8VH
3HULPHWHU,Q1RQXUEDQ8VH
3HUFHQW2I6LWH%HLQJ)DUPHG
3URWHFWLRQ3URYLGHG%\6WDWH$QG/RFDO*RYHUQPHQW
'LVWDQFH)URP8UEDQ%XLOWXS$UHD
'LVWDQFH7R8UEDQ6XSSRUW6HUYLFHV
6L]H2I3UHVHQW)DUP8QLW&RPSDUHG7R$YHUDJH
&UHDWLRQ2I1RQIDUPDEOH)DUPODQG
$YDLODELOLW\2I)DUP6XSSRUW6HUYLFHV
2Q)DUP,QYHVWPHQWV
(IIHFWV2I&RQYHUVLRQ2Q)DUP6XSSRUW6HUYLFHV
&RPSDWLELOLW\:LWK([LVWLQJ$JULFXOWXUDO8VH
727$/6,7($66(660(1732,176 
3$579,, (To be completed by Federal Agency)
5HODWLYH9DOXH2I)DUPODQG(From Part V)
7RWDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW(From Part VI above or a localsite assessment)
727$/32,176(Total of above 2 lines)
6LWH6HOHFWHG'DWH2I6HOHFWLRQ :DV$/RFDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW8VHG"
<HV 1R
5HDVRQ)RU6HOHFWLRQ
(See Instructions on reverse side))RUP$'
7KLVIRUPZDVHOHFWURQLFDOO\SURGXFHGE\1DWLRQDO3URGXFWLRQ6HUYLFHV6WDII

+RQH\ 0LOO 0LWLJDWLRQ 6LWH )HGHUDO +LJKZD\ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
6WUHDP 5HVWRUDWLRQ 6XUU\ &RXQW\ 1RUWK &DUROLQD

✔QRQH  DFUHV
&251  DFUHV  DFUHV 
6XUU\ &RXQW\ 1& /(6$1$2FWREHU   E\ H0DLO

 
 









 
 
 











   
From:Tasha King
To:Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC
Subject:RE: Honey Mill Mitigation Site - Surry County, NC - AD1006 Form Request
Date:Friday, October 19, 2018 7:42:00 AM
Attachments:Honey Mill - AD1006 Form Final.pdf
image001.png
Good Morning,

Attached is the completed Farmland Conversion Impact Evaluation form for the Honey Mill
Mitigation Site for your records.

Thank you for your assistance,

Tasha King | Environmental Scientist
O: 919.851.9986 x116

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 W. Millbrook Rd, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609

From: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 4:11 PM
To: Tasha King <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Honey Mill Mitigation Site - Surry County, NC - AD1006 Form Request
Importance: High

Tasha:

Please find attached the Farmland Conversion Impact rating evaluation for the Honey Mill Mitigation
Site in Surry Co., NC.

I saw in your 09/19/2018 email that you sent one back in July. Looks like got lost in the system since
the last one I have from you is in July 20, 2018 for the Double H Farm. I apologize for any
inconvenience but sometimes happens. I’ve been telling our customer to double check with me, at
least, a week after the first email has been sent since it is not the first time it happens.

If I can be of further assistance please let me know.

Have a great evening!!

Milton Cortes
Acting State Soil Scientist
Natural Resources Conservation Service
4407 Bland Rd, Suite 117
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
From: Tasha King [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 3:13 PM
To: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC <[e-mail]>
Subject: Honey Mill Mitigation Site - Surry County, NC - AD1006 Form Request

Good Afternoon,

Thank you very much for your help on this! I just pasted in my previous email below with the
information on Honey Mill Mitigation Site and I’ll reattach the forms and maps. I didn’t want to just
forward the email just in case there was something wrong with the chain and what’s why you didn’t
get it before. Please let me know if you need anything else!

Thank you,
Tasha

From: Tasha King
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 8:38 AM
To: Cortes, Milton - NRCS, Raleigh, NC <[e-mail]>
Subject: Request for AD1006 Form - Honey Mill Mitigation Site - Surry County, NC

Good Morning,

I have a request for a completed AD-1006 form for an NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
stream restoration project (Honey Mill Mitigation Site) located in Surry County. The project site is
located at latitude 36.429798, longitude -80.610641. I have attached the AD-1006 form with Parts I
and III filled out, as well as a site and soil map. The soil map includes a soil breakdown. Please let me
know if you need any additional information.

Thank you for your time and assistance,

Tasha King | Environmental Scientist
704.332.7754

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203


tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘;WͿϳϬϰ͘ϯϯϮ͘ϳϳϱϰͻϭϰϯϬ^ŽƵƚŚDŝŶƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϰͻŚĂƌůŽƚƚĞ͕EϮϴϮϬϯ

:ƵůLJϯϬ͕ϮϬϭϴ

^ŚĂŶŶŽŶĞĂƚŽŶ
EŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂtŝůĚůŝĨĞZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ 
ŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨ/ŶůĂŶĚ&ŝƐŚĞƌŝĞƐ
ϭϳϮϭDĂŝů^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĞŶƚĞƌ
ZĂůĞŝŐŚ͕EϮϳϲϵϵ

^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
  ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕EŽƌƚŚĂƌŽůŝŶĂ


ĞĂƌDƐ͘ĞĂƚŽŶ͕

tŝůĚůĂŶĚƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕/ŶĐ͘ƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƐƌĞǀŝĞǁĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞŶƚŽŶĂŶLJƉŽƐƐŝďůĞŝƐƐƵĞƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŐŚƚĞŵĞƌŐĞ
ǁŝƚŚƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƚŽĨŝƐŚĂŶĚǁŝůĚůŝĨĞŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ͕ĂƐƚƌĞĂŵ
ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƚĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶ^ƵƌƌLJŽƵŶƚLJ͕E͘h^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉĂŶĚĂŶKǀĞƌǀŝĞǁ^ŝƚĞDĂƉ
ƐŚŽǁŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂĂƌĞĞŶĐůŽƐĞĚ͘dŚĞƚŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĨŝŐƵƌĞǁĂƐƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ
DŽƵŶƚŝƌLJ^ŽƵƚŚ͕ϳ͘ϱͲDŝŶƵƚĞh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐYƵĂĚƌĂŶŐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚůĂƚŝƚƵĚĞ
ϯϲ͘ϰϮϵϳϵϴ͕ůŽŶŐŝƚƵĚĞͲϴϬ͘ϲϭϬϲϰϭ͘

dŚĞ,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞŝƐďĞŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶͲŬŝŶĚŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƵŶĂǀŽŝĚĂďůĞƐƚƌĞĂŵ
ĐŚĂŶŶĞůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘dŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨsĞŶĂďůĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚ
ƐĞǀĞŶƵŶŶĂŵĞĚƚƌŝďƵƚĂƌŝĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂůůĨůŽǁƚŽƌĂƌĂƚZŝǀĞƌ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĐŚĂŶŶĞůŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ
ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚĂƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůLJĚĞŐƌĂĚĞĚ͕ƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJĚƵĞƚŽŝƚƐƵƐĞĂƐĐĂƚƚůĞƉĂƐƚƵƌĞ͘ĂƚƚůĞŚĂǀĞĨƵůůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
ƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĂŵƐǁŚŝĐŚŚĂƐƌĞƐƵůƚĞĚŝŶĞdžƚĞŶƐŝǀĞĞƌŽƐŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĐŝƐŝŽŶ͘

tĞƚŚĂŶŬLJŽƵŝŶĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĨŽƌLJŽƵƌƚŝŵĞůLJƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞĂŶĚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘WůĞĂƐĞĨĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽĐŽŶƚĂĐƚƵƐǁŝƚŚ
ĂŶLJƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚLJŽƵŵĂLJŚĂǀĞĐŽŶĐĞƌŶŝŶŐƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘

^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕

dĂƐŚĂ<ŝŶŐ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ĐŝĞŶƚŝƐƚ



ƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚ͗
&ŝŐƵƌĞϭ^ŝƚĞDĂƉ
&ŝŐƵƌĞϮh^'^dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉ

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
August 8, 2018
Tasha King
Wildlands Engineering
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
SUBJECT: Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. King:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your July 30,
2018 letter regarding plans for a stream restoration project on unnamed tributaries to the Ararat River in
Surry County. You requested review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with respect
to fish and wildlife associated with the project. Our comments on this project are offered for your
consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Details were not provided in the letter on design nor the size of the project. The project is proposed as a
mitigation project and will involve stream enhancement and restoration.
This project should not impact wild trout resources. We recommend that riparian buffers that are to be
reestablished be as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC generally
recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the benefits of buffers,
including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) 803-
6054 if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program







,ŽŶĞLJDŝůůDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
ĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĐĂůdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ
&/'hZ^



Venable CreekVenable CreekUT1
UT2
UT2AUT
2
UT3
UT4
UT
5
UT6
U T6 Rel ic
Figure 1 Site Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹2014 Aerial Photography
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Non-Project Streams
Intermittent Streams
Perennial Streams
Overhead Power Line
0 400 800 Feet
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC¹0 400 800 Feet
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Mount Airy South USGS 7.5 minute Topographic Quadrangle
U
T
6
UT5UT
4
U
T
3
UT
2
UT
2
A
UT1 Venable CreekVenable
Creek
UT6
R
e
l
i
c
WfC2
WoE
BbC
CsA
WoD DeF
Figure 3 Soils Map
Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Yadkin River Basin (03040101)
Surry County, NC
¹0 400 800 Feet
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
BbC - Braddock fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (2.8 acres)
CsA - Colvard and Suches soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, moderately eroded (6.58 acres)
DeF - Devotion-Rhodhiss-Bannertown complex, 45 to 90 percent slopes, rocky (1.77 acres)
WfC2 - Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded (0.03 acres)
WoD - Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony (0.49 acres)
WoE - Woolwine-Fairview-Westfield complex, 25 to 25 percent slopes, stony (5.32 acres)
Project Streams
Non-Project Streams
APPENDIX 6 – IRT Communications  

MEETING NOTES

MEETING: IRT Site Walk
HONEY MILL Mitigation Site
Yadkin 03040101; Surry County, NC
DEQ Contract No. 7619
DMS Project No. 100083
Wildlands Project No. 005-02178

DATE: Tuesday, September 25, 2018

LOCATION: Little Mountain Church Road
Mt. Airy, NC

Attendees
Todd Tugwell, USACE
Andrea Leslie, USFWS
Mac Haupt, DWR
Paul Wiesner, DMS
Kelly Phillips, DMS
Kirsten Ullman, DMS
Periann Russell, DMS
Shawn Wilkerson, Wildlands
Aaron Earley, Wildlands

Materials
• Wildlands Engineering Honey Mill Mitigation Site Technical Proposal dated March 28, 2018 (in response
to RFP #16-007406)

Meeting Notes
The meeting began at 9:00 AM. Shawn presented an overview of the Honey Mill Mitigation Site (Site) at the
parking location. From there, the group proceeded to walk the entire site in the following general order: UT1,
Venable Creek Reach 1, UT2A, UT2, UT3, UT4, Venable Creek Reach 2, UT5, and UT6. Detailed meeting minutes,
organized by stream reach, are presented on the following pages.
While IRT members agreed that the Site is suitable to provide compensatory stream mitigation and that stream
treatment(s) seemed appropriate, adjustments to credit ratios are expected. The IRT provided feedback
regarding credit ratios on the enhancement II reaches and these ratios are included in this memo. Wildlands and
DMS understand that final design approaches and crediting rationale must be fully justified in the mitigation
plan.
The meeting concluded at 12:00 PM.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 2
HONEY MILL Mitigation Site
September 25, 2018 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
1. UT1 - Restoration
o UT1 will be restored, beginning at a culvert under Siloam Road and continuing to the confluence
with Venable Creek. Restoration will connect the channel to its floodplain.
o The group agreed that restoration is appropriate given the lack of pattern and bedform diversity
and erosion along the left bank.
2. Venable Creek Reach 1 - Restoration
o Todd and Mac noted that the section between the Little Mountain Church Road culvert and the
UT1 confluence looked geomorphically stable and fits better within an E-II approach. Wildlands
agreed to change this section to E-II.
o The channel begins to become incised downstream of the UT1 confluence. Todd and Paul
discussed the possibility of a 50’ – 100’ E-I transition section before restoration.
o The group agreed that the next section was most likely dug out along the left valley wall and spoil
cast into the middle of the valley. The group noticed the low point of the valley closer to the right
valley wall and Shawn said the new stream would try to follow the low point where feasible.
Periann suggested that the historic low point be pointed out and addressed in the mitigation plan.
o The banks along the lower section of Reach 1 become lower as its flows along a fence line.
Multiple cattle wallow areas have impacted the banks in this section.
o Mac and Todd remarked that the need for widespread restoration was not obvious on Reach 1.
Shawn noted that achieving priority 1 restoration is important and the transitioning back and forth
between restoration and incised E-II would not be feasible.
o Ultimately, the IRT agreed that restoration is valid from a point downstream of UT1 confluence to
the confluence with UT3 with a small transition of E1. (see figure).
3. UT2A – Enhancement II
o This reach will be fenced to exclude cattle. Cattle trails parallel the stream channel to the
upstream fence line.
o Todd questioned the validity of a 3:1 ratio given the presence of an existing wooded buffer. He
said that 2.5:1 is typically allowed for livestock exclusion and buffer restoration. Reference was
made to ongoing discussions between IRT, DMS, and providers about establishing guidelines for E-
II ratios that account for degree of cattle impact and presence of buffer. This point was discussed
for most of the reaches throughout the site.
o Shawn compared the absence of understory within the project limits and the full understory
upstream of the project where there are no cows. Todd mentioned that if understory buffer
restoration is claimed, then performance criteria for survival should be set.
o Todd and Andrea remarked that this reach was closer to a 5:1 ratio.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 4:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
4. UT2
• Reach 1 – Enhancement II
o This reach flows through a wooded buffer similar to UT2A. Cattle will be fenced out of this reach.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 3
HONEY MILL Mitigation Site
September 25, 2018 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
o Andrea remarked that supplemental planning would be beneficial between the woodline and the
confluence with UT2A.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 4:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
• Reach 2 - Restoration
o The downstream section of UT2 has been heavily impacted by cattle. A new channel has formed
to flow around the cattle wallow area. A channel will be restored through this area.
o Todd and Mac noted that the cattle wallow area looked like a wetland and to be cautious when
designing a channel through it.
o The barn adjacent to the existing channel will be removed.
5. UT3 – Enhancement II
• Reach 1 – Enhancement II
o Cattle will be fenced out and a BMP will be installed at the upstream end. Some minor channel
work will also be needed at the upstream end.
o Shawn noted how widespread cattle impact was much more obvious during previous site visits.
o Mac said that the middle section of the reach looked stable and thought a 3:1 to 4:1 ratio was
valid.
o Shawn reiterated that sections of stable areas were combined with sections requiring more work
to develop reach-wide ratios.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 3:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
• Reach 2 – Restoration
o The group agreed that restoration is warranted for the downstream reach of UT3. Moving the
channel back into the middle of the valley and connecting to a restored Venable Creek is
acceptable.
6. UT4 – Enhancement II
o This reach consists of cattle exclusion, spot bank stabilization, and a BMP at the upstream end to
stabilize the transition. A short section of channel work will be done at the downstream tie in with
Venable Creek.
o Todd noted that this reach exhibited the most cattle impact so far.
o Todd asked about the extent of planting. Shawn answered that planting will occur only where the
existing buffer is impacted for spot bank stabilization activities. Todd mentioned that it would be
helpful to show the spot bank treatment locations on a map.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 3:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
7. Venable Creek Reach 2 – Enhancement II
o While there is minimal cattle impact and erosion on the upstream section of this reach, the
channel becomes more incised and instable as you walk downstream. Cattle will be excluded from
the entire reach and bank and bench grading will be implemented on the downstream section.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 4
HONEY MILL Mitigation Site
September 25, 2018 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
o Todd questioned if it would be better to break the reach into shorter sections based on proposed
approaches as opposed to lumping it all together.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 2.5:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
8. UT5 – Enhancement II
o A cattle wallow area has diverted flow from the old channel and has formed a new channel. Cattle
will be excluded from this reach and the flow will be re-established into the old channel. The
group agree that this is the best approach.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 3:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
9. UT6
• Reach 1 – Enhancement II
o This reach begins at an eroded seep upstream and flows through a narrow valley. Cattle will be
excluded and spot channel stabilization will be implemented along this reach. A BMP will be
installed at the upstream end to stabilize the eroded seep.
o Ultimately, the decision was made that 3:1 would be the ratio for this reach.
• Reach 2 – Restoration
o Cattle impact has diverted stream flow away from the old channel. The stream now flows down a
cattle trail all the way to Venable Creek. This section will be restored to flow down the natural
valley.
o The group agreed with this approach.

Attached is a figure that updates approaches and ratios.

These meeting minutes were prepared by Aaron Earley October 8, 2018 and reviewed by Shawn Wilkerson on October 8,
2018 and represent the authors’ interpretation of events.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. page 5
HONEY MILL Mitigation Site
September 25, 2018 IRT Site Walk Meeting Notes
Stream Credits Proposed for the Honey Mill Mitigation Site: REVISED October 9, 2018
Stream Credits
Reach Management Objectives Type of
Mitigation
Length
(feet)1 Ratio Stream
Credits
RESTORATION
Venable Creek
Reach 3
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile with Priority
1 restoration. Install habitat structures, allow bankfull floodplain
access. Establish native riparian buffer, exclude cattle.
Restoration 1,687 1:1 1,687
UT1
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile with Priority
1 restoration. Install habitat structures, allow bankfull floodplain
access. Establish native riparian buffer, exclude cattle.
Restoration 211 1:1 211
UT2 Reach 2
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile with Priority
1 restoration. Install habitat structures, allow bankfull floodplain
access. Establish native riparian buffer, exclude cattle.
Restoration 203 1:1 203
UT3 Reach 2
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile with Priority
1 restoration. Install habitat structures, allow bankfull floodplain
access. Establish native riparian buffer, exclude cattle.
Restoration 395 1:1 395
UT6
Reach 2
Restore appropriate dimension, pattern, and profile with Priority
1 restoration. Install habitat structures, allow bankfull floodplain
access. Establish native riparian buffer, exclude cattle.
Restoration 324 1:1 324
Restoration Subtotal 2,820 2,820
ENHANCEMENT
Venable Creek
Reach 1 Exclude cattle, plant the riparian buffer. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 150 2.5:1 60
Venable Creek
Reach 2
Excavate floodplain bench, install in-stream structures, transition
to priority 1 downstream. Exclude cattle, plant the riparian buffer.
Treat invasives.
Enhancement I 150 1.5:1 100
Venable Creek
Reach 4 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 1,907 2.5:1 763
UT2 Reach 1 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 870 4:1 217
UT2A Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 935 4:1 234
UT3 Reach 1 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle, plant the riparian
buffer. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 813 3:1 271
UT4 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 438 3:1 146
UT5 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle, plant the riparian
buffer. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 353 3:1 118
UT6 Reach 1 Spot repair erosion and incision, exclude cattle, plant the riparian
buffer. Treat invasives. Enhancement II 296 3:1 99
Enhancement II Subtotal 5,912 2,008
Project Total 8,832 LF - - -
4,828 Cool
Stream
Credits

UT6 - Reach 1 UT6 -Reach 2
Venable Creek - Reach 4UT5
UT4
UT3 - Reach 1 UT3 -Reach 2Venable Creek - Reach 3UT1UT2 -Reach 2 U T2 - R e a c h 1
UT2A
¬«1
¬«2
¬«3
Crossing 330' Gated Ford
Crossing 220' Fenced Culvert
Crossing 110' Utility
Venable Cr eek - Reach 2
Venable Cr eek - Reach 1 1260124012201180116011401
1
2
0
1
0
8
0
1
0
6
01080106010401020980960
1
2
2
0
11801140112010401020980960
1140
1120
1080 104010201
2
4
011601140
1 1 2 0
1
0
8
0
10801040980Figure 6 Concept MapHoney Mill Mitigation SiteYadkin River Basin (030401 01)
Surry County, NC¹0 300 600150 Feet
2014 Aerial Photog rap hy
Project Location
Proposed Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II (2.5:1)
Stream Enhancement II (3:1)
Stream Enhancement II (4:1)
Non-Project Streams
Topographical Contour (20')
Overhead Power Line
!(Reach Breaks
^_BMP
APPENDIX 7 – Invasive Species Treatment Plan 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1

Appendix 7 Invasive Species Treatment Plan
Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished
project. These site inspections may identify the presence of invasive vegetation. If, during the
monitoring period, invasive species threaten the survivability of planted woody vegetation in an area
that exceeds 1% of the planted easement acreage, the invasive species shall be treated. Smaller areas
may be treated at the discretion of the project engineer and biologist, if deemed in the best interest of
the Site. Generally, the treatment plan shall follow the below guidelines in Table 1 for common invasive
species found in riparian areas; however, the treatment may be changed based on the professional
judgement of the project engineer and biologist. For invasive species not listed in the below table that
threaten the survivability of the planted woody vegetation, Wildlands shall notify DMS of the invasive
species observed and the plan for treatment prior to treating the species. All invasive species treatment
will be reported in the following year’s monitoring plan.
Table 1. Invasive Species Treatment – Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Multiflora Rose
(Rosa multiflora)
Foliar treatment of large populations with 4% glyphosate solution. Cut stump treatment is
time consuming, though effective. Treat in spring/summer.
Autumn Olive
(Elaeagnus
umbellate)
Cut stump treatment with glyphosate (Aquaneat or other) is effective at controlling larger
individuals. Use 20% solution with non-ionic surfactant sprayed on stump with squirt
bottle immediately after cutting. Hack and squirt treatment is also effective using triclopyr
(Garlon 3A) at 5% solution. Use notched hatchet blade to create pocket for herbicide in
cambium layer. Basal bark treatment is an option. Basal bark is quicker treatment option
for large populations but usually +/- 50% efficacy and requires further treatment from
resprouts.
Japanese
Barberry
(Berberis
thunbergii)
Cut stump of larger individuals with 25-50% glyphosate solution (Aquaneat or other) with
non-ionic surfactant. Apply using paint brush immediately after cutting stump. Bag all
above ground material containing viable seeds and remove from site. Can also use
triclopyr (Garlon 3A or Garlon 4) in 25-50% solution. Apply using shoe polish bottle or
spray bottle immediately after cutting stump. Larger populations of immature individuals
use backpack sprayer with above concentrations of either chemical. Birds will readily
disperse seeds from mature bushes. Populations dynamics demand control of seed
bearing individuals to limit spread. Quite thorny and rampant. Naturalized in WNC
mountainous areas around Watauga, Ashe and Alleghany counties.
Honeysuckle
(Lonicera
japonica)
Small infestations of L. japonica can be pulled by hand. Monitor to remove any re-sprouts.
Care should be taken to bag and remove the plants, including mature fruits to prevent re-
establishment. Large infestations of L. japonica will usually require a combination of cut
stump and foliar herbicide treatments. Where vines have grown into the tree canopy, cut
each stem as close to the ground as possible. Treat the freshly cut surface of the rooted
stem with a 25 percent solution of glyphosate or triclopyr. Groundcovers of L. japonica can
be treated with a foliar solution of 2 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-
ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all the leaves.
Chinese Privet
(Ligustrum
sinense)

Wet leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant: a glyphosate
herbicide as a 3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) in the late fall or early winter
when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, or elsewhere, Arsenal AC* as a 1-percent
solution (4 ounces per 3-gallon mix). Backpack mist blowers can broadcast glyphosate as a
3-percent solution (12 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or Escort XP* at 1 ounce per acre (0.2 dry
ounces per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons per acre) during winter for safety to dormant
hardwoods. Summer applications of glyphosate may not be as effective as other times and
Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 2

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique

require a higher percent solution. The best time for Arsenal AC* and Escort XP* is summer
to fall. For stems too tall for foliar sprays and when safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, apply a basal spray of Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints per 3-gallon mix)
in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or
diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply Stalker* as a 6-
to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product,
vegetable oil or mineral oil with a penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted) to
young bark as a basal spray making certain to treat all stems in a clump; or cut and
immediately treat the stump tops with Arsenal AC* as a 5-percent solution (20 ounces per
3-gallon mix) or Velpar L* as a 10-percent solution in water (1 quart per 3-gallon mix) with
a surfactant. When safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, immediately treat stump
tops and sides with Garlon 3A or with a glyphosate herbicide as a 20-percent solution (5
pints per 3-gallon mix) in water with a surfactant. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush
Killer are effective undiluted for treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores
(safe to surrounding plants). For large stems, make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or
when safety to surrounding vegetation is desired, Garlon 3A or a glyphosate herbicide
using dilutions and cut-spacings specified on the herbicide label (anytime except March
and April). An EZ-Ject tree injector can help to reach the lower part of the main stem;
otherwise, every branching trunk must be hack-and-squirt injected.
Kudzu
(Pueraria
montana)
Small patches of P. montana that are not well-established can usually be eliminated by
persistent weeding, mowing, or grazing during the growing season. The spread of a well-
established infestation of P. montana can be controlled the same way, but cutting will
typically not kill the roots of larger plants. For vines in tree canopies, cut the vines near the
ground and apply a 50 percent solution of triclopyr to the stumps. This procedure remains
effective at lower temperatures as long as the ground is not frozen. Large infestations can
be effectively controlled with a foliar solution of 2 to 3 percent glyphosate or triclopyr plus
a 0.5 percent non-ionic surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves. The ambient air
temperature should be above 65 degrees Fahrenheit. After the above ground vegetation is
controlled and it is possible to dig and cut into the central root crown, apply a 50 percent
solution of glyphosate or triclopyr to the wound. The most successful chemical control of P.
montana can be achieved with a foliar solution of 0.75 percent clopyralid plus a 0.5 percent
non-ionic surfactant. Monitor all treatments in subsequent years for re-sprouting.
Porcelain berry
(Ampelopsis
glandulosa var.
brevipedunculata)
The most effective chemical control of A. brevipedunculata has been achieved using
triclopyr formulations toward the end of the growing season when plants are transporting
nutrients to their roots. Apply a 2 percent solution of triclopyr plus a 0.5 percent non-ionic
surfactant to the foliage. Or cut the plants first, allow time for re-growth, and then apply
the herbicide mixture. A. brevipedunculata can also be killed with a mixture of 25 percent
triclopyr and 75 percent mineral oil applied to the basal parts of the stem to a height of 2
to 3 feet from the ground. This method should be used judiciously since it takes a lot of
chemical and can result in overspray. It has been used successfully in situations where no
other technique is feasible, such as cliff faces or other exposed sites.
Japanese Hops
(Humulus
japonicus)
Pre-emergent herbicide containing sulfometuron methyl (Oust XP) applied in early spring
causes minimal damage to established perennial vegetation. Mechanical control by cutting
or mowing as close to the ground as possible beginning in late spring and recurring
frequently until fall dieback is recommended. Post emergent herbicide treatment two
times a year (mid and late summer) to prevent the fall seed set is recommended.
Glyphosate provides good post-emergent chemical control. Hop seeds in the soil last up to
three years. Repeat treatments for two to three years should be expected, or longer in
areas subject to flooding that may receive influx of seeds from upstream infestations.
Cultural control methods which favor fast-growing tall tree species to create dense shade
Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 3

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
in spring and summer and canopy closure will discourage infestations, as Japanese hop
prefers direct sunlight and does not tolerate heavy shade.
Johnson Grass
(Sorghum
halepense)
Recommended control procedures:
Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in water with a surfactant
(June to October with multiple applications applied to regrowth).
• Recommendation for mature grass control: apply Outrider* as a broadcast spray at 0.75
to 2 ounces per acre (0.2 to 0.6 dry ounce per 3-gallon mix) plus a nonionic surfactant to
actively growing Johnsongrass. For handheld and high-volume sprayers, apply 1 ounce of
Outrider per 100 gallons of water plus a nonionic surfactant at 0.25 percent. Outrider is a
selective herbicide that can be applied over the top of certain other grasses to kill
Johnsongrass, or apply Plateau as a 0.25-percent solution (1 ounce per 3-gallon mix) when
plants are 18 to 24 inches (45 to 60 cm) tall or larger.
• Recommendation for seedling control: apply Journey as a 0.3-percent solution (1.2
ounces per 3-gallon mix) before Johnsongrass sprouts and when desirable species are
dormant or apply a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution (8 ounces per 3-gallon
mix) directed at the infestation.
Mimosa
(Albizia julibrissin)
Trees: Make stem injections using Arsenal AC* or when safety to surrounding vegetation is
desired, Garlon 3A or Milestone in dilutions as specified on the herbicide label (anytime
except March and April). For felled trees, apply the herbicides to stump tops immediately
after cutting. ORTHO Brush-B-Gon and Enforcer Brush Killer are effective undiluted for
treating cut-stumps and available in retail garden stores (safe to surrounding plants).
Saplings: Apply a basal spray to young bark using Garlon 4 as a 20-percent solution (5 pints
per 3-gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil or mineral oil with a
penetrant, or fuel oil or diesel fuel (where permitted); or undiluted
Pathfinder II. Elsewhere, apply Stalker* as a 6- to 9-percent solution (1.5 to 2 pints per 3-
gallon mix) in a labeled basal oil product, vegetable oil, kerosene, or diesel fuel (where
permitted).
Resprouts and seedlings: Thoroughly wet all leaves with one of the following herbicides in
water with a surfactant:
From June to August, either Escort XP at 1 ounce per acre (0.2 ounces per 3-gallon mix)
plus a glyphosate herbicide as a 2-percent solution addition (8 ounces per 3-gallon mix) or
Milestone VM Plus at 6 to 9 pints per acre (1.5 to 3 pints per 3-gallon mix and 10 gallons
per acre).
From July to September, Transline* † or Milestone as a 0.25-percent solution plus Garlon
3A as a 4-percent solution (1 ounce plus 5 ounces per 3-gallon mix).
Princess Tree
(Paulownia
tomentosa)
Foliar Spray Method: This method should be considered for large thickets of paulownia
seedlings where risk to non-target species is minimal. Air temperature should be above
65°F to ensure absorption of herbicides.
Glyphosate: Apply a 2% solution of glyphosate and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic surfactant
to thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray
drift damage to non-target species. Glyphosate is a non-selective systemic herbicide that
may kill non-target partially-sprayed plants.
Triclopyr: Apply a 2% solution of triclopyr and water plus a 0.5% non-ionic sur-factant to
thoroughly wet all leaves. Use a low pressure and coarse spray pattern to reduce spray
drift damage to non-target species. Triclopyr is a selective herbicide for broadleaf species.
In areas where desirable grasses are growing under or around paulownia, triclopyr can be
used without non-target damage.
Cut Stump Method: This control method should be considered when treating individual
trees or where the presence of desirable species precludes foliar application. Stump
treatments can be used if the ground is not frozen.
Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 7
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 4

Invasive Species Recommended Removal Technique
Glyphosate: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 25%
solution of glyphosate and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 50% of
the stump.
Triclopyr: Horizontally cut stems at or near ground level. Immediately apply a 50% solution
of triclopyr and water to the cut stump making sure to cover the outer 20% of the stump.
https://www.se-eppc.org/manual/princess.html

APPENDIX 8 – Site Protection Instrument 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 8
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1

Appendix 8 Site Protection Instrument
The land required for construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes
portions of the parcels listed in Table 1. A State of North Carolina held conservation easement has been
recorded on the Venable and Browne parcels to encompass the streams and wetlands being restored,
enhanced, and preserved along with their corresponding buffers.
Table 1: Site Protection Instrument – Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Property Owner Parcel ID Number County
Under Option to
Purchase by
Wildlands?
Conservation Easement Deed
Book (DB) and Page Number
(PG)
Acreage
Protected
Monty K. Venable et. al. 592800605518,
592700684669 Surry Yes DB: 1714 PG: 997-1010 13.46
LuAnn Venable Browne,
Charles Edward Browne 5928599301 Surry Yes DB: 1714 PG: 859-871 6.86

ar1 f14 HU 99f 1U1U (14
This Document eRecorded:
Fee: $26.00
Surry County,
3/25/2020 4
1' AM
Effo fYT
Received By: JENNIFER CROUSE
�CKA3eaa:fIlk Mp �337.ba
SURRY COUNTY
SPO File Numbers: S 6-B Q
)MS Project Number: 100083
'r
DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEI��ENT
�D RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
P RSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CONSTRVATION EASMl�'IEENT As�D RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
This 24th day of June, 2020, by Monty K. Venable as Executor of the Estate of Mary Lou
Venable, pursuant to an enforceable written contract entered into by Mary Lou Venable
prior to her death, ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is 140 Essex Lane, Mount Airy, NC
27030 to the State of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North
Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include
said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine,
Feminine, or neuter as required by context.
W
ITNESSETH:
'V�3CEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et sec .. the State of
North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environmental Quality (formerly Department of Environment and Natural Resources), for the
purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed I l May 2017
submitted electronically by "Hiatt &Fawcett, PLLC"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of t6e submitter agreement with the Burry county Register of Deeds.

riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
`VVtiEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between W ildlands
Engineering, Inc. and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, to provide
stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and Services Contract Number 7619.
ti'VHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is
Easement pursuant to N. C . Gen. Stat. § 121-3 5 5 and
qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
�'VHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States
\rmy Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding,
MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU recognized that the
Wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory mitigation for authorized
impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring, enhancing and preserving
the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
WHE��EAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
W�IEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corp
of Engineers, the U. S . Environmental Protection Agency, theFish and Wildlife Service, the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, andw the National Marine Fisheries Service
entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North Carolina Department
A Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem Enhancement
Program) with an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces the previously
effective MOA and MOU referenced above, and
XXT
I3'EREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
VM
EREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality (formerly Department of Environment and Natural Resources), which has been delegated
the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State to the Department of
Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 2 of 14

AS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real properties situated, lying, and being
in Eldora Township, Surry County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more
p
a r t i c u l a r l y described as that certain parcels of land containing approximately 97.78
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 313, Page 722 and
Deed Kook 205, Page 495 of the Surry County Registry, North Carolina; and
�CEI" I A.S, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting .and limiting the use of
the areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions
and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept said Easement and Access
Rights. The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of
unnamed tributaries to Venable Creek.
over the
NOW, THEF�EFoRE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement and Right of Access together with an access easement to and from the Conservation
Easement Area described below.
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Easement Areas A-1, A-2, and B containing a total of 13.462 acres as shown on the plats of
survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina: Division of
Mitigation Services, Loney Mill Mitigation Site, S P O File No, 86-BQ, DMS Site ID No.
100083 Property of Estate of Mary Lou Venable, Elisabeth Turner (License # L4440) and
in the Su County, North Carolina Register of Deeds at Plat Book 7 ,
recorded rry ty, g
Pagel D .
See attached "Exhibit A", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland andlor riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic
habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Conservation
Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of
the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these
purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
I. DI:RA.7C`I(JN OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 3 of 14

II. ACCESS EASE�NT
Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its employees, agents, successors and assigns, a
e etual, non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and upon the Property at all
p �
reasonable times and at such location as practically necessary to access the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes set forth herein ("Access Easement"). This grant of easement shall not vest
any rights in the public and shall not be construed as a public dedication of the Access Easement.
Grantor covenants, represents and warrants that it is the sole owner of and is seized of the
Property in fee simple and has the right to grant and convey this Access Easement.
III. G-I�:��.NTOR RESERVED USES �►ND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would im air or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
P
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area by
the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Any
rig hts not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived
from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong to the
Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses,
includat ing hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized `Vehicle YJse. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
p
rohibited except within a Crossing Areas) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey plat.
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage
in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such purposes including
or anized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the
g property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site.
D. Damage to Vegetation. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded survey
p
tat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or vegetation
that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or natural habitat,
all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All
industrial, residential and commercial
AG rev1ewed 11 May 2017

F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
II. Roads and traits. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement except within a Crossing Area as shown on the
recorded survey plat. All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement
Area shall be shown on the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Conservation Easement
Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement,
signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement Area.
J. Dum ing or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned
P
vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading,. filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing; removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock,
peat, minerals, or other materials.
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage
of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may temporarily be
withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subject to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
NCDMS Fuli Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 5 of 14

O. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
P. Crossin Areas. "Grantor reserves the right to the Internal Crossing Areas as shown on
g
the "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina: Division of Mitigation
Services Honey Mill Mitigation Site, SPO File No. 8&BQ, DMS Site ID No. 100083", Property
of Mary Lou Venable Estate, (Elisabeth Turner, PLS #L.4440) and recorded in the Sorry County,
at Plat Book 7 Page (aO for the following
North Carolina Register of Deeds g
purposes:
• Motorized vehicle crossing;
• utility crossings to include overhead and buried electrical, water lines and sewer lines;
tY ,
• Cattle crossing so long as fencing across a culvert In the Crossing Area prevents cattle
access to the stream, or a ford crossing is kept gated and cattle are only present in the stream
only under supervision while rotating cattle between pastures; and/or
• Installation, maintenance, or replacement of a culvert or ford crossing.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699�1652.
IV. G1�;��1�ITEE RESERVED TJSES
A. R,.ight of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees, agents,
successors and assigns, shall have a perpetual Right of Access over anal upon the Conservation
g
Easement Area to undertake or engage in any activities necessary to construct, maintain, manage,
enhance re pair, restore, protect, monitor and inspect the stream, wetland and any other riparian
resources in the Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein or any long-term
management plan for the Conservation Easement Area developed pursuant to this Conservation
g
Easement.
B. Restoration Actties. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
veg etation installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
re are the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade
p p
materials as needed to direct iter flow.n-stream, above ground, and subterraneous wa
C. Si ns. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted to
g
lace si sand witness osts on the Property to Include any or all of the following: describe the
P gn p
' ect�prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project boundaries
roJ
p
and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
Grantee in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the investment
and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which would cause
financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are required to restrict
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 6 of 14

livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so may result in the
State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences) within the conservation
area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the landowner (Grantor) must
provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for maintenance of crossing area(s),
however the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossin areas , at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
g ()
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
v. ENFORCEI�'IENT A►ND T�ElVIEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the pUoses of this Conservation Easement, Clrantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require re the restoration of such areas or features
in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or
use. an on Up Y breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall,
exce t as rovided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have
P P
nine 90 days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach. If the
breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this
Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover
damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and
authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Conservation
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b)
4 in in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any
to otherwise preserve or protect its
appropriate erson or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate
person
ri ht, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief,
g
if the breach is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from
this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be
irre arable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
P
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to
Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right,
with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement Area over the Property at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall
be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's
control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm., and earth movement, or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 7 of 14

D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
Incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. INIo Waiver. Enforcement of Ibis Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
VI. P�SCELL��TEClUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to Persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property are
the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of
the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in wng
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor
further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in
the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in. writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws,
and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the Property shall
notify the State Property Office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days
prior to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any request to void or
modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification requests shall be
addressed to:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 8 of 14

Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
13 21 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross
and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event
it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a
qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121�34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be
such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
VII. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or Invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment
of the Conservation Easement Area,
TQ HAVE �►.ND TO HOL13, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
A1�D Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of the Property in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
IN TESTIMONY ti'VrIiERLOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the
day and year first above written.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed I l May 2017
Page 9 of 14

(SEAL)
Mo K. Venable, Executor of the Mary Lou Venable Estate
pu suant to an enforceable written contract entered into by
Mary Lou Venable prior to her death
NORTK CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SURRY
I� Me 1 i nda C . Burnett a Nota��y Public in and fo
aforesaid, do hereby certify that Monty K. Venable, Grantor, persona
lly appeared before
me this day and acknowledged that he is the Executor of the Estate of Mary Lou Venable,
and that he, as Executor, being authorized to do so executed the foregoing instrument.
IN G�ITTNESS �TFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the 25 day of
June, 2020.
Notary Pu
My commission expires:
11/15/2020
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
MELINDA C. BUR�BTT
NOTARY PUBLIC
curry County, No arol' a
My Commission Expires Z
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 10 of 14

A Conservation Easement Jul
The State of North Carolina,
itigation Services,
Division of M
"Honey Mill Mitigation Site"
SPO FILE N0.8�6�BQ DNIS SITE IUD N'4.100
083
Descriptions for Conservation Easement for the State of North Carolina, Division of Mitigation
Services, Honey Mill Mitigation Site on the property of Mary Lou Venable, located in Eldora
Township , Surry County, North Carolina. All references to the Surry County Register of Deed.
PI1V: 5927-68-4669
Beginningat a rebarwith aluminum cap set (CE corner#1) at the intersection ofthe eastern
ri ht-of--way of State Road #1003 (Siloam Rd., 60' R/W) and the northern right-of-way of State
Road #2029 (Little Mountain Church Rd., 50' R/W), said rebar being the southwest corner of
Mar Lou Venable (now or formerly, see Deed Book 313, Pg. 722), said rebar being located S
85°25�54�� W 317.25 feet from Site Control Point #2 (rebar with plastic cap) having
NC Grid
g
g
Coordinates [NAD83(2011)] N= 977,841.84 USft, E= 1,525,370.69 USft;
thence, from the point of Beginning, with the right-of-way of SR#1003, N 19°47'29" E a distance
of 96.16'to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence, leaving said right-of-way, with the conservation easement, N 41°27'09"
E a distance of
290.38' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 27°16'20" E a distance of 275.59'to an existing iron stake on the common line of Mary
Lou Venable and Verla V. Phillips et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1209, Pg. 520);
thence with the common line N 49°06'16" E a distance of 777.00' to an existing 2"axle;
thence N 03°30'00" E a distance of 297.00' to a calculated point;
thence N 80°00'00" E a distance of 118.80' to a calculated point;
hence N 40°11'32" E a distance of 324.92' to a calculated point*
t
thence N 58°53'05" E a distance of 341.88' to a calculated point;
thence N 73°53'05" E a distance of 50.77' to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the common
line;
thence, leaving said common line, S 48°30'14" W a distance of 286.92' to a rebar with
aluminum cap set;
thence S 68°23'49" W a distance of 125.12' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 41°03'41" W a distance of 418.58' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 19°22'43" W a distance of 288.27' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 00045'32" W a distance of 142.29` to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence S 43°54`58" E a distance of 132.47to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 59°20'29" E a distance of 227.28' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 47°36'35" E a distance of 190.07' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence S 67°4632" E a distance of 221.77' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 11 of 14

thence S 47031'32" E a distance of 96.37 to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 35°20'33" W a distance of 98.99' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 60°06'06" W a distance of 197.40' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence S 43°20'23" W a distance of 33.68' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 32°03'28" E a distance of 200.43' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 57°41'14" E a distance of 140.25' to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the common
line of Mary Lou Venable and Randy Dean Venable et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book
1164, P g. 9421; .
thence with the common line, S 30°50'56" W a distance of 106.04' to a rebar with aluminum
cap sets
thence, leaving said common line, N 56°15'04" W a distance of 169.56' to a rebar with
aluminum an set;
thence N 30°11'18" W a distance of 168.48' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 53°28'40" W a distance of 332.79' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 26°37'57" W a distance of 275.42' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence N 08°04'28" W a distance of 40.77' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence N 53°15'04" W a distance of 132.37' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 45°49'48" W a distance of 404.55' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 31020'27" W a distance of 257.72' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence S 40058'17" W a distance of 127.89' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 14°27'58" W a distance of 326.14' to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the northern
right-of-way of SR#2029;
thence, with said right-of-way, N 67°0025" W a distance of 52.32' to a calculated point;
thence N 67°37'36" W a distance of 42.86' to a calculated point,
thence N 68°56'02" W a distance of 148.33' to the point of Beginning;
containig
n 9.583 acres, more or less, and shown as CE "A-1" on a plat prepared by Turner Land
Surve in PLLC (P-0702) of Swannanoa, NC, entitled "Conservation Easement for the State of
,
North Carolina, Division of Mitigation Services, Project: Honey Mill Mitigation Site" dated May
5, 202
0 and recorded in Plat Book 37. , Page 16D of the Surry County Register of
Deeds.
Beg inningat a rebarwith aluminum cap set (CE corner#58} on the common line of Mary Lou
Venable (now or formerly, see Deed Book 0 722}, and Verla V. Phillips et ux. (now or
formerlY , see Deed Book 1209, Pg. 520, Tract 2), said rebar being located N 37°3518 E
2,295,60 feet from Site Control Point #2 (rebar with plastic cap) having NC Grid Coordinates
[NAD83(2011)] N= 9771841s84 USft, E=1,525,370.69 USft;
thence from the point of Beginning, with the common line, N 73°53'05" E a distance of 82.01'
to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence N 16°53'05" E a distance of 79.20' to a calculated point;
thence N 45°3655" W a distance of 101.23' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence leaving said common line, with the conservation easement, N 70°51'48" E a distance of
31.17' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 12 of 14

thence N 28017'54" E a distance of 158.86 to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 56'05952" E a distance of 111.97' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 37"41'23" E a distance of 207.66' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 47°06'11" W a distance of 115.16' to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the common
line of Mary Lou Venable's property (now or formerly, see Deed Book 205, Pg. 495);
thence, with the common line, N 46059'11" E a distance of 19.02' to a calculated point;
thence S 74°00'49" E a distance of 383.60' to a rebar with aluminum cap set at the mouth of
Honey Branch on the western line of Verla V. Phillips et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book
1209, Pg. 520, Tract 1)
thence, with the common line and with the centerline of Honey Branch, S 1.8034'43" W a
distance of14.33'to a calculated point;
thence S 27°43'03" W a distance of 9.09' to a calculated point;
thence 10'29'51" E a distance of 14.82to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence, leaving said common line, N 76°27'08" W a distance of 165.87'to a rebar with
aluminum cap set;
thence S 36'00'31" W a distance of 229.84' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 47�24'28" W a distance of 243.69' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 19°53'53" W a distance of 141.97to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 25'13'27" E a distance of 136.05' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 49°33'06" E a distance of 215.41' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 42°43'11" W a distance of 125.77' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 40°17'12" W a distance of 401.72' to the point of Beginning;
'
containing 2.795 acres more or less and shown as CE "A-2" on a plat prepared by Turner Land
Surve ing, PLLC (P�0702) of Swannanoa, NC, entitled "Conservation Easement for the State of
Y
North Carolina, Division of Mitigation Services, Project: Honey Mill Mitigation Site" dated May
5 2020 and recorded in Plat Book _� ,Page / of the Surry County Register of
Deeds.
PIN: 5928-64-5518
CE "g„
Beginningat a rebarwith aluminum cap set (CE corner#35) on fihe common line of Mary Lou
Venable's p p ro erties (now or formerly, see Deed Book 313, Pg. 722 and Deed Book 205, Pg.
495), said rebar being located N 34'2248" E 2,959.16 feet from Site Control Point #2 (rebar
with plastic cap) having NC Grid Coordinates [NAD83(2011)] N= 977,841.84 USft, E=
1,525,370.69 USft;
Thence, from the point of Beginning, leaving the common line, with the conservation easement,
N 47006'11" W a distance of 226.94' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 01'11'34" E a distance of 53.23' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 72°3447" W a distance of 59.96' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 44°08'33" W a distance of 45.02' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 63°45'37" E a distance of 49.83' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 73°50'51" E a distance of 49.45' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2417
Page 13 of 14

thence S 55°4803" E a distance of 225.98 to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 20°42'13" E a distance of 115.08' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 49047`33" E a distance of 47.38' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 81°58'06" E a distance of 105.30' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thenceS78°35'09" E a distance of 117.68'to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the common
line of Mary Lou Venable and Verla V. Phillips et ux. (now or formerly, see Deed Book 1209, Pg.
S 20, Tract 1);
thence, with the common line, S 35°33'07" E a distance of 104.57' to a rebar with aluminum cap
set at the mouth of Honey Branch at the common corner of Mary Lou Venable properties and
Verla V. Phillips;
thence, leaving the Phillips line, with the Venable common line, N 74°00'49" W a distance of
383.60'to a calculated point;
thence S 46°59'11" W a distance of 19.02` to the point of Beginning;
containing 1,084acres, more or less, and shown as CE "B" on a plat prepared by Turner Land
Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) of Swannanoa, NC, entitled "Conservation Easement for the State of
North Carolina, Division of Mitigation Services, Project: Honey Mill Mitigation Site" dated May
5, 2020 and recorded in Plat Book , Page of the Surry County Register of
Deeds.
I�ICDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 14 of 14

K3 8b9 btl (I J)
This Document eRecorded:
Fee: $26.00
Surry County, North Carolina
. OC#
•3/24/202002:16:38
Pq
k*m0;aroij!n arrim uortier, megiismLer u
Received BY: JENNIFER CROUSE
p- Sfa.w�, y�f72 . a o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
SU1�12Y COUNTY
SPO File Numbers: 8 6 -B R
)MS Project Number: 100083
DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEl��IENT
AND RIGHT OF ACCESS PROVIDED
PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to: NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
13 21 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
THIS DEED OF CC)NSERVATIt�N EASEl�'IENT AND RIGHT OF ACCESS, made
This 24th day of June, 2020, by LuAnn Venable Browne and spouse Charles Edward Brown,
("Grantor"), whose mailing address is 929 Siloam Road, Mount Airy, NC 27030 to the State
of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department
of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321.
The designations of Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs,
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as
required by context.
VR
TNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seq., the State of
North Carolina has established the Division of Mitigation Services (formerly known as the
Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of
Environmental Quality (formerly Department of Environment and Natural Resources), for the
purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and
riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
submitted electronically by "Hiatt & Fawcett,JPLLC"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Burry county Register of Deeds.

WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between Wildlands
Engineering, Inc. and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, to provide
stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and Services Contract Number 7619.
W:�IEFtEAS, The State of Nol-th Carolina is
Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and
qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding,
(MOU) duly executed by all parties on November 4, 1998. This MOU recognized that the
wetlands Restoration Program was to provide effective compensatory mitigation for authorized
impacts to wetlands, streams and other aquatic resources by restoring, enhancing and preserving
the wetland and riparian areas of the State; and
'�'V�HEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Re
sources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly Ecosystem Enhancement Program) is to provide for compensatory mitigation by
effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing
and preserving ecosystem functions; and
`'VrHEF�AS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. .Fish and Wildlife Service, the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, and the National Marine Fisheries Service
entered into an agreement to continue the In -Lieu Fee operations of the North Carolina Department
of Natural Resources' Division of Mitigation Services (formerly Ecosystem Enhancement
Program) With an effective date of 28 July, 2010, which supersedes and replaces the previously
effective MOA and MOU referenced above; and
WIiEF�EAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8th day of February 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Division of Mitigation Services in the Department of Environmental
Quality (formerly Department of Environment and Natural Resources), which has been delegated
the authority authorized by the Governor and Council of State to the Department of
Administration, has approved acceptance of this instrument; and
WHEREAS,
Grantor ovens in fee simple certain real properties situated, lying, an
in Eldora Township, Su:rry County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 2 of 13
d being
more

p a r t i c.0 l a r l y described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 30.$2
acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 1209, Page 520 (Tract
2) of the Surry County Registry, North Carolina; and
wHE��EAS, .Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement and Right of Access
over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of
the areas of the Property subject to the Conservation Easement to the terms and conditions
and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing,to accept said Easement and Access
Rights. The Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of
unnamed tributaries to Venable Creek.
Now, T�IEREFO
restrictions hereinafter set
conveys unto Grantee, its
F�.E, in consideration of the mutual co
forth, Grantor unconditionally and
successors and assigns, forever and
Easement and Right of Access to
Easement Area described below.
venants, terms, conditions, and
irrevocably hereby grants and
in perpetuity, a Conservation
gether with an access easement to and from the Conservation
The Conservation Easement Area consists of the following:
Easement Area C containing a total of 6.863 acres as shown on the plats of
'Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina: Division
survey entitled
of Mitigation
Services, Honey Mill Mitigation Site, S P O File No. 86-BR, DMS Site ID No. 100083 ', Elisabeth
Turner (License # L-4440) and recorded in the Surry County, North Carolina Register of Deeds
at Plat Book 7 , Page
See attached "Exhibit A", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Conservation Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Conservation Easement Area that
contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic
habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Conservation
Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of
the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these
purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the. Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assilesseesand licensees.
gns, personal representatives, agents, ,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
Page 3 of 13
AG reviewed 11 May 2017

II. ACCESS EASEMENT
Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its employees, agents, successors and assigns, a
perpetual, non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress over and upon the Property at all
reasonable times and at such location as practically necessary to access the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes set forth herein ("Access Easement"). This grant of easement shall not vest
any rights in the public and shall not be construed as a public dedication of the Access Easement.
Grantor covenants, represents and warrants that it is the sole owner of and is seized of the
Property in fee simple and has the right to grant and convey this Access Easement.
III. Gl�:��CTOR F�ESERVED USES AND T�EST�ICTELl ACTIVITIES
The Conservation Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that
would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly
reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Conservation Easement Area by
the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Any
rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation
credits, including, but not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived
from each site within the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong to the
Grantee. without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are
prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated:
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses,
including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Conservation Easement
Area for the purposes thereof.
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited except within a Crossing Areas) or Road or Trail as shown on the recorded survey plat.
c
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage
in educational uses in the Conservation Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area for such purposes including
organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of -the
property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site,
41
D. Damage to Vegetation.. Except within Crossing Area(s) as shown on the recorded survey
plat and as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, or vegetation
that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Conservation Easement Area to persons or natural habitat,
all cutting; removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited.
E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and commercial
uses are prohibited in the Conservation Easement Area.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 4 of 13

F. Agricultural use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Conservation Easement
Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland.
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, ut111ty
pOle, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Conservation Easement Area.
�. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction or maintenance of new roads, trails,
walkways, or paving in the Conservation Easement except within a Crossing Area as shown on the
recorded survey plat. All existing roads, trails and crossings within the Conservation Easement
Area shall be shown on the recorded survey plat.
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Conservation Easement Area except interpretive
signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Conservation Easement
Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement,
signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Conservation
Easement .Area.
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned
vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Conservation Easement Area is
prohibited.
K. Grading, Mineral TJse, Excavation, Dredging.
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, hydraulic fracturing
peat, minerals, or other materials.
There shall be no grading, filling,
removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock,
L. Water Quality .and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Conservation Easement Area. No altering or
tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored,
enhanced, or created drainage patterns is allowed. All removal of wetlands, polluting or
discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the
Conservation Easement Area is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage
of all other water sources, water from within the Conservation Easement Area may temporarily be
withdrawn for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock on the Property.
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no further subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the Conservation Easement Area portion of the Property owned by the
Grantor in fee simple ("fee") that is subject to this Conservation Easement is allowed. Any future
transfer of the Property shall be subj ect.to this Conservation Easement and Right of Access and to the
Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the
Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein.
N. Development Rights. .All development rights are permanently removed from the
Conservation Easement Area and are non-transferrable.
NCDMS Full. Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 5 of 13

tj. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Conservation Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non-
native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited.
P. Crossing Areas. "Grantor reserves the right to the Internal Crossing Areas as shown on
the "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina: Division of Mitigation
Services, Honey Mill Mitigation Site, S P 0 File No. 8 &BR, DMS Site ID No. 100083 ",
(Elisabeth Turner, PLS #L4440) and recorded in the Surry County, North Carolina Register of
Deeds at Plat Book 7 Page for the following purposes:
• Motorized vehicle crossing;
• Utility crossings to include overhead and buried electrical, water lines and sewer lines;
• Cattle crossing so long as fencing across a culvert in the Crossing Area prevents cattle
access to the stream, or a ford crossing is kept gated and cattle are only present in the stream
only under supervision while rotating cattle between pastures; and/or
• Installation, maintenance, or replacement of a culvert or ford crossing.
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the Division of Mitigation
Services, 1652 Mall Services Center, Raleigh, NC 276994 652.
IV. GT�ANTEE F:ESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees, agents,
successors ana assigns, shall have a perpetual Right of Access over and upon the Conservation
Easement Area to undertake or engage in any activities necessary to construct, maintain, manage,
enhance, repair, restore, protect, monitor and inspect the stream, wetland and any other riparian
resources in the Conservation Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein or any long-term
management plan for the Conservation Easement Area developed pursuant to this Conservation
Easement.
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment , to grade, fill, and
prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade
materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow.
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted to
place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following: describe the
prof ect, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the pro] ect boundaries
and the holder of the Conservation Easement.
D. Fences. Conservation Easements are purchased to protect the investments by the State
(Grantee) in natural resources. Livestock within conservations easements damages the investment
and can result in reductions in natural resource value and mitigation credits which would cause
financial harm to the State. Therefore, Landowners (Grantor) with livestock are required to restrict
livestock access to the Conservation Easement area. Repeated failure to do so may result in the
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 6 of 13

State (Grantee) repairing or installing livestock exclusion devices (fences) within the conservation
area for the purpose of restricting livestock access. In such cases, the landowner (Grantor) must
provide access to the State (Grantee) to make repairs.
E. Crossing Area(s). The Grantee is not responsible for nrlaintenance of crossing area(s),
however, the Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, reserve the right to repair
crossing area(s), at its sole discretion and to recover the cost of such repairs from the Grantor if
such repairs are needed as a result of activities of the Grantor, his successors or assigns.
v. ENFORCEMENT AI�TD F�EMEDIES
A. Enforce�rnent. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
aRowed to prevent any activity within the Conservation Easement Area that is inconsistent with
the purposes of this Conservation Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features
in the Conservation Easement Area that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or
use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall,
except as provided below, notify the Grantor in writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have
ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach. If the
breach and damage remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this
Conservation Easement by bringing appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover
damages, as well as injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and
authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Conservation
Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b)
to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any
appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate
right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief,
if the breach is or. would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from
this Conservation Easement, and the Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be
irreparable and remedies at law inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided
hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to
Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement.
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right,
with reasonable notice, to enter the Conservation Easement .Area over the Property at reasonable
tunes for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement.
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall
be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the
Conservation Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's
control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent
action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life or damage to the Property resulting from such causes.
D.
Incurre
Costs of Enforcement. beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
d by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 7 of 13

including, without limitation, any costs
in violation of the terms of this Consery
of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
ation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor.
E. No waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee.
vI. MISC�LE�►IEt)US
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreernent of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby.
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein. Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property are
the sole responsibility of the Grantor. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to
comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of
the Reserved Rights.
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, rettun. receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other.
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the
Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor
further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in
the Property is conveyed is subject to the Conservation Easement herein created.
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof.
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
si ned b all arties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
g Y p
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws,
and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. The owner of the Property shall
noti the State Property office and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days
fY
?nor to the initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property or of any request to void or
p
modify this Conservation Easement. Such notifications and modification requests shall be
addressed to:
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 1 l May 2017

Division of Mitigation Services Program Manager
NC State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1321
and
General Counsel
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
'Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross
and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event
it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a
q
ualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code,
and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be
such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation
purposes described in this document.
VII. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all rerna:'�ning rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Conservation
Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Conservation Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment
of the Conservation Easement Area,
TO HAVE �.ND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes,
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of the Property in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same is free from
encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever.
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 9 of 13

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the
day and year first above written.
(SEAL)
LuAnn Venable Browne
(SEAL)
Charles Edward Browne
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 10 of 13

NORTH CAROL,IZ�IA
COUNTY OF SURRY
I, Melinda C. Burnett , a Notary Public 1n and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that LuAnn Venable Browne, Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
� WITNESS WHER
June, 2020.
Notary Public
.EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the 24tj' day of
My commission expires:
11/15/2020
NORTI� CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SLrRRY
MFL[NUA G. QURCVETT
NOTARY PUBLIC
Surry County, North arol' 41
My Commission Expires 2,
I Melinda C . Burnett a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that Charles Edward Browne, Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument.
IN ��IZNES S V1IFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the 24th day of
June, 2020.
Notary Pu
c
My commission expires:
11 /1 5/2020
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template
MEt[NQa G. BU�N�TT
NOTARY PUBLIC
Surry6Gounly�.North Ca lima,
My Comm**sign Expires Ail AZ -
AG rev1evved 11 May 2017
Page 11 of 13

W 1714 PG 870 UUU4 bit. 3 /41
A Conservation Easement Jul
The State of North Carolina,
Division of Mitigation Services,
"Honey Mill Mitigation Site"
SPO FILE N0.86-BR DMSSITEID hTn. 100083
Descriptions for Conservation Easement forthe State of North Carolina, Division of Mitigation
Services, Honey Mill Mitigation Site on the property of Mary Lou Venable and of Charles E.
Browne and LuAnn Venable Browne, located in Eldora Township, Surry County, North Carolina.
All references to the Surry County Register of Deed.
P/N: 5927-59-930Z
Beginning at an existing iron stake (CE corner #4) on the common line of Verla V. Phillips et ux.
(now or formerly, see Deed Book 1209, Pg. 520, Tract 2) and Mary Lou Venable (now or
formerly, see Deed Book 313, Pg. 722), said rebar being located N 03°46'32" E 528.96 feet from
Site Control Point #2 (rebar with plastic cap) having NC Grid Coordinates [NAD83(2011)] N=
977,841.84 USft, E= 1,525,370.69 USft;
thence, from the point of Beginning, with the conservation easement, N 42°41'22" E a distance
of 183.38' to a rebar with, aluminum cap set;
thence N 48°3008" E a distance of 326.31 to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 23°06'36" E a distance of 193.46' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 78°51'04" W a distance of 397.42' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence N 64044'11" W a distance of 225.49'to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N b46°2247" W a distance of 260.93' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 24°41'13" W a distance of 137.93' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 66041'50" E a distance of 91.60' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence S 3804331" E a distance of 251.03' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 56�25114" E a distance of 225.27' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 77'58'15" E a distance of 241.17' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence S 75°03'22" E a distance of 164.41' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 35°56136" E a distance of 276.25' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
tLotence N 55033'37" E a distance of 186.24' to a rebar with aluminum can set;
thence N 59'20'42" W a distance of 232.68' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence N 73°16'53" W a distance of 176.33' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 14°15'02" E a distance of 86.09' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 79008'26" E a distance of 141.90' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 62°48'14" E a distance of 156.42' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 56°22'07" E a distance of 139.57' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence N 54°07'50" E a distance of 372.83' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 07°45'32" W a distance.of 52.67' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Template AG reviewed 11 May 2017
Page 12 of 13

thence N 5302731 E a distance of 27.11 to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 12°26'37" Ea distance of 51.3 I to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence N 44°33'32" E a distance of 148.81' to a rebar with aluminum cap sets
thence N 70°51'48" Ea distance of142.03'to a rebar with aluminum cap set on the common
line of Verla V: Phii llps and Mary Lou Venable;
thence, with said common line, S 45°36'55" E a distance of 101.23' to a calculated point
thence S 16°53'05" W a distance of 79.20' to a calculated point;
fihence S 73053'05" W a distance of 82.01' to a rebar with aluminum cap set;
thence S 73°53'05" W a distance of 95.58' to a rebar with aluminum cap set,
thence S 73°53'05" W a distance of 50.77' to a calculated point;
thence S 58°53'05" W a distance of 341.88' to a calculated point;
thence S 40°11'32" W a distance of 324.92' to a calculated point;
thence S 80°00'00" W a distance of 118.80' to a calculated point;
thence S 03°30'00" W a distance of 297.00' to an existing 2"axle;
thence S 49°06'16" W a distance of 777.00' to the point of Beginning;
containing 6.863 acres, more or less, and shown as CE "C" on a plat prepared by Turner Land
Surveying, PLLC (P-0702) of Swannanoa, NC, entitled "Conservation Easement for the State of
North Carolina, Division of Mitigation Services, Project: Honey Mill Mitigation Site" dated May
2 20 and recorded in Plat Book 7 � ,Page © of the Surry County Register of
5, 0 .� _
NCDMS Full Delivery Conservation Easement Temp]ate
AG reviewed 11 May 201-7
Page 13 of 13

APPENDIX 9 – Maintenance Plan 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site Appendix 9
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1

Appendix 9 Maintenance Plan
The site shall be visited semi-annually and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period for seven years. These
site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. Routine
maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction and may
include the following:
Table 1. Maintenance Plan – Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Component/
Feature Maintenance through project close-out
Stream
Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in-stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations
of live stakes and other target vegetation along the channel – these shall be conducted
where success criteria are threatened or at the discretion of the Designer. Areas where
storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to
prevent bank failures and head-cutting. Beaver activity will be monitored and beaver dams
on project streams will typically be removed, at the discretion of the Designer, during the
monitoring period to allow for bank stabilization and stream development outside of this
type of influence.
Vegetation
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted community.
Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental planting,
pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species requiring treatment per the
Invasive Species Treatment Plan shall be treated using a combination of best professional
judgement and recommendations from that plan, in accordance with NC Department of
Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Site boundary
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as-needed basis.

APPENDIX 10 – Financial Assurance 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site  Appendix 10 
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1  
Appendix 10 Financial Assurances 
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service’s In‐Lieu Fee Instrument 
dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources has provided 
the US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to 
satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by DMS. This commitment provides financial assurance for all 
mitigation projects implemented by the program. 

APPENDIX 11 – Credit Release Schedule 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site  Appendix 11 
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 1  
Appendix 11 ‐ Credit Release Schedule and Supporting Information 

All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported in the approved final 
mitigation plan, unless there are discrepancies which indicate additional credits may be warranted, in 
which case an addendum will be proposed to the IRT. Under no circumstances shall any mitigation 
project be debited until the necessary Department of the Army (DA) authorization has been received for 
its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided written approval for the project in 
the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of the mitigation project. The DE, in 
consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if performance standards have 
been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release schedules below. In cases where 
some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be released depending on the 
specifics of the case. Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended, depending on the extent to 
which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard.  
The following conditions apply to the credit release schedules: 
A. A reserve of 10% of a site’s total stream credits will be released after four bankfull events have 
occurred, in separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards 
are met. In the event that less than four bankfull events occur during the monitoring period, 
release of these reserve credits is at the discretion of the IRT.  
B. For mitigation banks, implementation of the approved Mitigation Plan must be initiated no later 
than the first full growing season after the date of the first credit transaction (credit sale).  
C. After the second milestone, the credit releases are scheduled to occur on an annual basis, 
assuming that the annual monitoring report has been provided to the USACE in accordance with 
the General Monitoring Requirements, and that the monitoring report demonstrates that 
interim performance standards are being met and that no other concerns have been identified 
on‐site during the visual monitoring. All credit releases require written approval from the 
USACE.  
D. The credits associated with the final credit release milestone will be released only upon a 
determination by the USACE, in consultation with the NCIRT, of functional success as defined in 
the Mitigation Plan. 
The schedules below list the updated credit release schedules for stream and wetland mitigation 
projects developed by bank and ILF sites in North Carolina: 

Honey Mill Mitigation Site  Appendix 11 
DMS ID No. 100083 Page 2  
Table A: Stream Credit Release Schedule 
Credit Release Schedule and Milestones for Streams 
Credit 
Release 
Milestone 
Release Activity 
ILF/NCDMS 
Interim 
Release 
Total 
Released 

2* 
Completion of all initial physical and biological improvements made 
pursuant to the Mitigation Plan 30% 30% 

3 
Year 1 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 10% 40% 

4 
Year 2 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 10% 50%  

5 
Year 3 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 10% 60% 

6** 
Year 4 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 5% 65% 
(75%***) 

7 
Year 5 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 10% 75% 
(85%***) 

8** 
Year 6 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable and 
interim performance standards have been met 5% 80% 
(90%***) 

9 
Year 7 monitoring report demonstrates that channels are stable, 
performance standards have been met 10% 90% 
(100%***) 
*For ILF sites (including all NCDMS projects), no initial release of credits (Milestone 1) is provided because ILF 
programs utilized advance credits, so no initial release is necessary to help fund site construction. To account for 
this, the 15% credit release associated with the first milestone (bank establishment) is held until the second 
milestone, so that the total credits release at the second milestone is 30%. In order for NCDMS to receive the 
30% release (shown in the schedules as Milestone 2), they must comply with the credit release requirements 
stated in Section IV(I)(3) of the approved NCDMS Instrument. 
**Please note that vegetation data may not be required with monitoring reports submitted during these 
monitoring years unless otherwise required by the Mitigation Plan or directed by the NCIRT. 
***10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met. 

APPENDIX 12 – Preliminary Plans 

Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, NCforNCDEQDivision of Mitigation ServicesYadkin River Basin 03040101Title Sheet0.1Project Overview 0.2General Notes and Symbols0.3Typical Sections 1.1-1.7Stream Plan and ProfileVenable Creek2.1-2.10UT12.11UT22.12-2.17UT2A2.18-2.22UT2B2.37UT32.23-2.28UT42.29-2.31UT52.32-2.33UT62.34-2.36Planting Plan3.1-3.7Spoil Area4.1Erosion and Sediment Control 5.1-5.6Details6.1-6.13Fencing Plan7.1-7.6Vicinity MapNot to ScaleBEFORE YOU DIG!IT'S THE LAW!CALL 1-800-632-4949N.C. ONE-CALL CENTERSheet IndexProject DirectoryOwner:NC DEQ - Division ofMitigation Services1652 Mail Service CenterRaleigh, NC 27699Kelly Phillips919-707-8291DMS ID 100083USACE ID No. SAW-2018-01789NC DWR No. 20181271Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831CONSTRUCTION PLANSISSUED SEPTEMBER 23, 2020NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Cover and General Notes.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
0.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Title SheetEngineering:704-332-7754Wildlands Engineering, IncLicense No. F-08311430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Aaron Earley, PESurveying:Turner Land SurveyingP.O. Box 148Swannanoa, NC 28778919-827-0745David S. Turner, PLS© 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 HERE SITE
0'150'300'450'(HORIZONTAL)NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Overview.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
0.2
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Project Overview
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE OUOUOUOUOU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUOUOUOUOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEUT2UT2A UT1CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE
CE
CECECECECECECECEC
E
CECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CECE
CECECECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXUT4SHEET 2.12 SHEET 2.1UT3UT
5
UT6
SILOAM ROAD
VENABLE CREEKSHEET 2.29
SH
E
E
T

2
.
2
3
SHEET
2.34
LITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH RD SHEET 2.2SHEET 2.3SHEET 2.4SHEET 2.6SHEET 2.7SHEET 2.11SHEET 2.20SHEET 2.18
SH
E
E
T

2
.
3
3 VENABLE FARM ROADSHEET 2.5SHEET 2.8SHEET 2.9SHEET 2.10SHE
E
T

2
.
1
6
SHEET 2.14 SHEET 2.22
SHEET 2.25
SHEET 2.27SHEET 2.31
SHEET 2.36
SHEET
2
.
3
2 SHEET 2.37UT2B
N/FJACK S. FLETCHER and wife,GLENDA KAYE H. FLETCHERD.B. 337, PG. 369PIN: 5928-60-3034N/FMICHAEL LEE VENABLEand wife,PHYLLIS ANN VENABLED.B. 612, PG. 686D.B. 585, PG. 703PIN: 5927-67-1505N/FRANDY DEAN VENABLE and wife,DAPHNE VENABLED.B. 1164, PG. 942P.B. 23, PG. 109andUNRECORDED MAPS BYROBERT E. REIF, L-1516C-368(A), C-368(D), & C-998(B)c/o BOWMAN-BUNN, PCMT. AIRY, NCPIN: 5927-67-7679N/FBILLIE LEE WHITTD.B. 1012, PG. 452P.B. 30, PG. 172PIN: 5927-78-7923N/FMONTY LEE SIMPSON and wife,DELORES DAWN SIMPSOND.B. 720, PG. 914andUNRECORDED MAP BYROBERT E. REIF, L-1516C-368(E)c/o BOWMAN-BUNN, PCMT. AIRY, NCPIN: 5927-78-4648N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Cover and General Notes.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
0.3
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
General Notes and Symbols Existing Property LineExisting Thalweg AlignmentExisting Major Contour (5' Interval)Existing Minor ContourExisting Top of BankExisting Overhead Utility LineExisting Overhead Utility EasementExisting Utility PoleExisting Storm PipeExisting FenceExisting WetlandExisting Farm RoadExisting Rip RapExisting BedrockExisting Tree LineExisting TreeRecorded Conservation EasementRecorded Internal Conservation Easement BreakProposed Temporary Construction EasementProposed Thalweg AlignmentProposed BankfullProposed Major Contour (5' Interval)Proposed Minor Contour10+00100100CECECEXXXExisting FeaturesProposed FeaturesProposed Log SillSee Detail 2, Sheet 6.4Proposed Lunker LogSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.4Proposed Log J-hookSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.2Proposed Rock SillSee Detail 2, Sheet 6.3Proposed Boulder Cross VaneSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.4Proposed Ford CrossingSee Detail 1, Sheet 6.10Proposed Culvert CrossingSee Detail 2, Sheet 6.10Proposed StructuresCE-IXCE-IXTCETCETCEOUEOUEOUOUOUErosion Control FeaturesTOBTOBProposed Various Constructed RifflesSee Sheets 6.1-6.2Proposed Rock CascadeSee Detail 1, Sheet 6.3Proposed Brush ToeSee Sheet 6.7Proposed Vegetated Soil LiftSee Detail 1, Sheet 6.4Proposed Debris RemovalProposed BMP - Bioretention CellSee Detail 2 & 3, Sheet 6.9Proposed BMP - SPSCSee Detail 1, Sheet 6.9Proposed StructuresF
[X][X][X]LODLODProposed Limits of DisturbanceProposed Safety FenceSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.6Proposed Silt FenceSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.5Proposed Haul RoadProposed Silt Fence OutletSee Detail 2, Sheet 6.6Proposed Temporary CrossingSee Detail 2, Sheet 6.5Proposed Construction EntranceSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.6Proposed Pump Around SystemSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.5TPROJECT NOTES:1.Topographic survey was completed by Turner Land Surveying in November 2019.2.Topographic data outside of survey limits was supplemented with LiDAR data from 2016.3.Parcel boundary survey was completed by Turner Land Surveying in December 2019.4.Final plan set supersedes other construction aids such as, but not limited to, digitalsurface models, GPS models, or other hard copy exhibits not included in the plan set.SAFSAFSAFGeneral Notes1.All sediment and erosion control practices shall complywith the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment ControlPlanning and Design Manual.2.Contractor shall disturb only as much channel bank as canbe stabilized with temporary seeding, mulch, and erosioncontrol matting by the end of each workday.3.Contractor will install pump-around systems to divert flowwhile working in live, flowing channels. Contractor shall notremove pump-around systems and advance to the nextwork area until the current work area is completed andstabilized. If flow is not sufficient at the time ofconstruction to cause sedimentation to downstreamwaters, pump-around operations will not be required. Inthese cases, rock silt check dams will be installed near thedownstream extent of the work area for the current phase.Contractor shall take measures necessary to ensure thatstorm flows do not damage work areas or createsedimentation of aquatic habitat.4.Locations for staging, stockpile areas, and stream crossingshave been provided. Additional or alternative stagingand/or stockpile areas and stream crossings may be utilizedby the Contractor provided that all practices comply withthe North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planningand Design Manual, that the areas are located within thepermitted limits of disturbance, and that the areas areapproved by Engineer prior to implementation.5.The Engineer will field walk the site with the Contractorprior to work beginning and field flag vegetation to be usedas transplant material. Vegetation to be used as transplantmaterial (juncus, alders, small trees, and sod mats) shallnot be disturbed until Contractor is prepared to installtransplants.6.Contractor shall not exceed the limits of disturbance shownon the plans.7.Various types of constructed riffles and cascades arespecified on the plans. Contractor will build the specifictypes of constructed riffles and cascades at locationsshown on the plans. Changes in type or riffle or cascademust be approved by the Engineer.8.Topsoil will be harvested, stockpiled, and reapplied to theextent that it is encountered.9.Soil amendment is discussed in the permanent seedingspecification. Amendments will be applied to assist withgrass establishment and tree growth in some or alldisturbed areas. The limits of application will bedetermined by the Engineer in the field.10.Leaf litter will be harvested form adjacent wooded areasand applied to the project site. The contractor will be paidbased on area of coverage. The contractor will be expectedto harvest leaf litter until supply has been exhausted fromreasonably accessible areas adjacent to the site.Construction Sequence1.The Contractor shall coordinate with Engineer to setupmeeting with regional (Winston-Salem) NCDEQ office forpre-construction SEC meeting.2.Contact North Carolina "ONE CALL" Center(1.800.632.4949) before any excavation.3.Mobilize equipment and materials to the site.4.Identify and establish construction entrances, staging andstockpile areas, temporary access roads, erosion andsediment control practices, and stream crossings asindicated on the plans for work areas.5.Set up temporary facilities, locate equipment withinstaging areas, and stockpile materials needed for the initialstages of construction within stockpile area(s).6.Install and maintain onsite rain gauge and log books forNPDES and SEC permit requirements.7.Construction shall progress from upstream to downstream.Active construction areas shall not flow to completedconstruction areas to prevent sedimentation of recentconstructed habitat. The only exception to this ispermanent stream crossings, which may be installed at theend of construction to prevent loading by BMPs at theupstream extent of tributaries shall be constructed beforedownstream channel work. Detailed constructionsequencing shall be determined by the Contractor and theContractor shall provide a schedule to the Engineer prior tocommencement.8.Perform any necessary clearing and grubbing in phases aswork progresses. Bank vegetation and vegetationimmediately adjacent to live channels shall be leftundisturbed as long as possible.9.A pump-around system is required when working in the livestream. Install impervious dikes at upstream anddownstream ends of pump-around locations. Thepump-around operation shall be performed between thesedike locations.10.Perform excavation and grading of channel and floodplain.11.Stockpile soil as necessary. Ensure that erosion andsediment control practices are properly installed andfunctioning in stockpile areas as shown on the Erosion andSediment Control Plan (SEC Plan).12.Construct in-stream structures and install riffle and cascadefeatures according to plans, details, and specifications asconstruction progresses.13.Seed and/or sod, mat, and mulch banks and floodplainareas according to plans and details.14.Once disturbed areas and exposed slopes are stabilized,remove pump-around system, if used, and progress to thenext phase.15.Backfill abandoned channel sections with stockpiled soil. Allnon-native, invasive species shall be treated and/orremoved from the old channel prior to backfilling.16.Seed and mulch or sod any backfill sections beforeproceeding to next phase.17.Once all phases of channel, floodplain, and wetlandconstruction are complete, prepare the floodplain forplanting per the specifications.18.Remove temporary stream crossings, stockpile areas, anderosion and sediment control practices.19.Apply temporary and permanent seed, mulch, andvegetation in the floodplain.20.Ensure that the site is free of trash, debris, and any leftoverconstruction materials prior to demobilization.21.Demobilize grading equipment from the site.22.Seed, mulch and stabilize staging areas and stockpile areas.23.Demobilize all equipment, offices, buildings, and otherfacilities assembled on the site.
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
Venable Creek Reach 2 - Riffle
STA: 100+91 - 103+59
Venable Creek Reach 2 - Pool
STA: 100+91 - 103+59 005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.109.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaVenable Creek Reach 2Typical Sections19.5'
1.5'
10.0'4.5'5.0'
VARIES
2.5'-5.1'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
4:1 2:1
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
3.6'3.3'3.6'
EXISTING GROUND
2:1 M
A
X
15.0'
4.5'3.0'3.0'4.5'
1.7'1.5'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
EXISTING
GROUND
2:1 M
A
X
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
Venable Creek Reach 3 - Riffle
STA: 103+59 - 120+09
Venable Creek Reach 3 - Pool
STA: 103+59 - 120+09 005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.209.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaVenable Creek Reach 3Typical Sections20.2'
1.5'
10.0'5.2'5.0'
VARIES
2.5'-5.1'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL4:1 2:1
1:1 MAX1:1 MAX
3.6'4.0'3.6'
EXISTING
GROUND
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
15.6'
4.5'3.3'3.3'4.5'
1.7'1.5'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
3:1 3:1
EXISTING
GROUND
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
AND TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3:1 MAX
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
AND TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3:1 MAX
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.309.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaVenable Creek Reach 4Typical SectionsNOT TO SCALE
Venable Creek Reach 4 - Floodplain Grading
STA: 133+50- 140+27
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3:1 MAX
EXISTING
GROUND
MINIMUM 15'
PROPOSED
GRADE
20:1
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
UT1 - Riffle
STA: 200+00 - 202+77
UT1 - Meander Pool
STA: 200+00 - 202+77 005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.409.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT 1Typical Sections15.0'
8.8'2.2'4.0'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
4:1 2:1VARIES
2.2'-3.9'
1:
1
M
A
X
1:1 MAX2.6'2.0'2.6'
PROPOSED THALWEG
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
3:1 MAX
1.3'
11.5'
3.25'2.5'2.5'3.25'
1.5'1.3'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:
1
2.5:1
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
3:1 MAX
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
UT2 Reach 2 - Riffle
STA: 307+98 - 311+69
UT2 Reach 2 - Meander Pool
STA: 307+98 - 311+69
UT2 Reach 2 - In-Line Pool
STA: 307+98 - 311+69 005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.509.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT 2 Reach 2Typical Sections7.5'
3.5'0.5'3.5'
VARIES
1.0'-1.4'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:1 2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
FILL EXISTING CHANNELEXISTING GROUND
7.7'
0.6'
4.0'1.7'2.0'
VARIES
1.0'-2.1'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2:1
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
1.5'
1.1'
1.5'
4:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
FILL EXISTING CHANNELEXISTING GROUND
5.6'
1.5'1.3'1.3'1.5'
0.7'0.6'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2.5:
1
FILL EXISTING CHANNELEXISTING GROUND
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
UT3 Reach 2 - Riffle
STA: 508+31 - 511+45
UT3 Reach 2 - In-Line Pool
STA: 508+31 - 511+45
005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.609.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT 3 Reach 2Typical Sections6.4'
3.0'0.4'3.0'
VARIES
0.8'-1.2'
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
2.5:
1
2.5:1
FILL EXISTING CHANNELEXISTING GROUND
3:1 MAX
4.9'
1.25'1.2'1.2'1.25'
0.6'TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
2.5:
1
0.5'
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL
EXISTING GROUND
3:1 MAX
SheetChecked By:Job Number:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Date:Revisions:1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203Tel: [phone]License No. F-0831NOT TO SCALE
UT2B, UT4, & UT6 Reach 2 - Riffle
STA:100+00 - 100+80
STA: 603+29 - 605+06
STA: 803+32 - 805+52
005-02178JK/CGEGRASE1.709.23.2020X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\Typical.dwgOctober 14, 2020Honey Mill Mitigation SiteSurry County, North CarolinaUT2B, UT4 & UT6 Reach 2Typical SectionsUT2B, UT4, & UT6 Reach 2 - In-Line Pool
STA: 100+00 - 100+80
STA: 603+29 - 605+06
STA: 803+32 - 805+52
4.8'
1.8'1.2'1.8'
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
1:
1
M
A
X 1:1 MAX
VARIES
1.0'-2.0'
PROPOSED THALWEG
EXISTING
GROUND
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
3.7'
1.25'1.20'1.25'
0.5'
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED THALWEG
PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED BANKFULL2.5:
1 2.5:1
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS
EXISTING
GROUND
1025103010351040104510251030103510401045100+00100+50101+00101+50102+00102+50103+00103+50104+00104+20-2.3%-2.3%-4.1%-3.5%-3.5%-3.2%-3.0%-1.9%-6.8%STA = 100+94ELEV = 1037.12STA = 101+48ELEV = 1033.26STA = 101+54ELEV = 1033.26 STA = 101+69
ELEV = 1035.50
STA = 101+94
ELEV = 1034.45STA = 101+98ELEV = 1034.23STA = 104+19
ELEV = 1026.98
STA = 101+31ELEV = 1035.85
STA = 102+18
ELEV = 1034.19
STA = 103+95
ELEV = 1029.68
STA = 102+36
ELEV = 1033.61
STA = 102+90
ELEV = 1032.32
STA = 103+47
ELEV = 1031.18STA = 103+02ELEV = 1030.60STA = 103+06ELEV = 1030.60STA = 103+14
ELEV = 1031.82
STA = 103+57ELEV = 1029.34STA = 103+60ELEV = 1029.34STA = 103+66
ELEV = 1030.68STA = 102+52ELEV = 1032.56STA = 102+57
ELEV = 1033.32
PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADETIE TO EXISTINGBEDROCKCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
X
CE
-
I
XFO
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
UXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX103
51035 1040104010451050105510601045
1035104010451050O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
E
O
U
EEXISTING FARM ROADEXISTING FARM ROADTO BE ABANDONED201+00
202+00100+00101+00102+00103+00104+00105+00TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBCR-CRCR-JZCR-CHCR-CRCR-CR1
0
3
5104010451050FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)REMOVE EXISTINGFENCE FROM EASEMENTCR-CHCR-CRCR-CHCR-CHCR-CRSTA: 100+00VENABLE CREEKBEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IISTA: 100+91VENABLE CREEKEND REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT ISTA: 103+02END REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT IBEGIN INTERNAL EASEMENT BREAKSTA: 103+54VENABLE CREEKEND INTERNAL EASEMENT BREAKBEGIN REACH 3 - RESTORATIONSTA: 202+73END UT1 - RESTORATIONSTA: 102+38VENABLE CREEK REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT ICR-CHUT1VENABLE CREEKEXISTING 60" CMPINV: 1039.36'LITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH ROAD
MATCH
L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

1
0
4
+
2
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.1
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.15'4.5'3.0'3.0'4.5'1.7'1.5'3:13:1Venable Creek Reach 2 - Typical Riffle19.5'1.5'10.0'4.5'5.0'VARIES2.5'-5.1'4:12:11:1 MAX1:1 MAX3.6'3.3'3.6'Venable Creek Reach 2 - Typical Pool
1015102010251030103510151020102510301035104+20104+50105+00105+50106+00106+50107+00107+50108+00108+50-1.8%-1.3%-2.2%-2.3%-1.8%-3.5%-5.0%-5.0%-3.8%-2.9%STA = 104+46ELEV = 1029.27STA = 104+80ELEV = 1028.10STA = 105+06ELEV = 1025.41STA = 105+15ELEV = 1025.41 STA = 105+34ELEV = 1027.76STA = 105+65ELEV = 1026.19STA = 105+89ELEV = 1023.49STA = 105+97ELEV = 1023.49STA = 106+12
ELEV = 1026.02
STA = 106+46
ELEV = 1024.34STA = 106+70ELEV = 1021.89STA = 106+93
ELEV = 1024.14
STA = 107+29
ELEV = 1022.74STA = 107+59ELEV = 1020.39STA = 107+68ELEV = 1020.39STA = 107+88
ELEV = 1022.48
STA = 108+25
ELEV = 1021.39
STA = 104+27ELEV = 1026.98
STA = 106+78ELEV = 1021.89PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IXCE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IXSAFSAF
SAFSAFSAFOU OU
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1025102510301030103510351040104510501025103010351040OUE OUE OUE OUE
EX
I
ST
ING

FARM
ROAD104+00105+00106+00107
+
0
0
108+0010
9
+
0
0
CR-JZ
1025
1030
1025CR-CRCR-
J
Z
CR-ALRCR-
C
H
CR-CRC
R
-
C
RSTA: 103+54VENABLE CREEKEND INTERNAL EASEMENT BREAKVENABLE CREEKREMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)PROPOSED BMP SEEDETAIL 2, SHEET 6.9EXISTING FARM ROADTO BE RELOCATEDFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 104+20
MATCH LINE - STA 108+50
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.2
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2A15.6'4.5'3.3'3.3'4.5'1.7'1.5'3:13:1Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Riffle20.2'1.5'10.0'5.2'5.0'VARIES2.5'-5.1'4:12:11:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X3.6'4.0'3.6'Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Pool
1010101510201025103010101015102010251030108+50109+00109+50110+00110+50111+00111+50112+00112+50112+80-2.3%-2.5%-1.8%-1.3%-1.2%-0.7%-1.4%STA = 108+57ELEV = 1019.40STA = 108+68ELEV = 1019.40STA = 108+88ELEV = 1021.14STA = 109+21ELEV = 1020.41STA = 109+48ELEV = 1018.13STA = 109+57ELEV = 1018.13STA = 109+74ELEV = 1020.14STA = 110+22ELEV = 1018.97
STA = 110+50
ELEV = 1016.67
STA = 110+60
ELEV = 1016.67
STA = 110+79
ELEV = 1018.83
STA = 111+07
ELEV = 1018.33STA = 111+28ELEV = 1016.09STA = 111+35
ELEV = 1016.09
STA = 111+49
ELEV = 1018.35
STA = 111+84
ELEV = 1017.88STA = 112+04ELEV = 1015.72STA = 112+10
ELEV = 1015.72
STA = 112+23
ELEV = 1017.88
STA = 112+54
ELEV = 1017.52STA = 112+72ELEV = 1015.35STA = 112+78ELEV = 1015.35PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECES
A
F XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1025103010351040103010351040104510501055102010301035EXISTING FARM ROAD109+00
110+001
1
1
+
0
0
112+00113+00102510301020
CR-CRCR-CHC
R
-
C
R
CR-CRC
R
-WDCR-CRVENABLE CREEKFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)EXISTING FARM ROADTO BE RELOCATEDREMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 108+50
MATCH LINE - STA 112+80
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.3
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2A15.6'4.5'3.3'3.3'4.5'1.7'1.5'3:13:1Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Riffle20.2'1.5'10.0'5.2'5.0'VARIES2.5'-5.1'4:12:11:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X3.6'4.0'3.6'Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Pool
1005101010151020102510051010101510201025112+80113+00113+50114+00114+50115+00115+50116+00116+50117+00-1.9%-3.6%-3.7%-3.5%-0.5%-1.6%-2.0%-1.8%-2.1%STA = 112+90ELEV = 1017.52STA = 113+39ELEV = 1016.60STA = 113+66ELEV = 1014.51STA = 113+75ELEV = 1014.51STA = 113+93ELEV = 1016.44STA = 114+37ELEV = 1014.87STA = 114+67ELEV = 1012.95STA = 114+95
ELEV = 1014.68
STA = 115+29
ELEV = 1013.44STA = 115+60ELEV = 1011.08STA = 115+70ELEV = 1011.08STA = 115+91
ELEV = 1013.22
STA = 116+49ELEV = 1011.19STA = 116+75
ELEV = 1009.32
STA = 116+84
ELEV = 1009.32
STA = 114+75
ELEV = 1012.95 PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADECR-CHCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CESAFSAFSAFSAFSAFSAFSAFSAF
SAFSAFSAFSAFSAFSAF
SAF
SAF SAFSAFSAFSAFX
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXC
R
-
J
Z1020
1
0
1
5
10151020 10251030103510251030511+00112+00113+00114+00
115+0011
6
+
0
0
117+00311+0010101020CR-WDCR-CRCR
-
A
L
R
CR-JZSTA: 115+65VENABLE CREEKSTA: 311+69UT2CONFLUENCEVENABLE CREEKUT2UT3FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 112+80
MATCH LINE - STA 11
7
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.4
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2A15.6'4.5'3.3'3.3'4.5'1.7'1.5'3:13:1Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Riffle20.2'1.5'10.0'5.2'5.0'VARIES2.5'-5.1'4:12:11:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X3.6'4.0'3.6'Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Pool
1000100510101015102010001005101010151020117+00117+50118+00118+50119+00119+50120+00120+50121+00121+50-1.8%-0.8%-4.0%-3.8%-3.0%STA = 117+03ELEV = 1010.69STA = 117+40ELEV = 1009.17STA = 117+72ELEV = 1006.90STA = 117+82ELEV = 1006.90STA = 118+04ELEV = 1008.93STA = 118+40ELEV = 1007.57STA = 118+71ELEV = 1005.23STA = 118+81ELEV = 1005.23STA = 119+01
ELEV = 1007.24
STA = 119+55
ELEV = 1005.62
STA = 119+77
ELEV = 1004.03
STA = 119+87
ELEV = 1004.03
STA = 120+01
ELEV = 1005.12 PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECESAFSAFSAFSAFSAFSAFX X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX10101010 1015102010251010101510201025TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB510+00511+00116+00 117+00118+00
119+00120+00121+00122+001010 1015
1010CR-ALRCR-JZCR-CH
CR-CHSTA: 115+65VENABLE CREEKSTA: 311+69UT2CONFLUENCESTA: 118+81VENABLE CREEKSTA: 511+45UT3CONFLUENCESTA: 120+01VENABLE CREEKEND REACH 3 - RESTORATIONBEGIN REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT II100+80100+00
VENABLE CREEKUT3U
T
2
B
STA: 119+61VENABLE CREEKSTA: 100+80UT2BCONFLUENCEFILL EXISTINGCHANNEL (TYP)REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)UT2B TO BE STABILIZED ANDTIED TO VENABLE CREEKSEE SHEET 2.37MATCH LINE - STA 117+00
MATC
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

1
2
1
+
5
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.5
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2A15.6'4.5'3.3'3.3'4.5'1.7'1.5'3:13:1Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Riffle20.2'1.5'10.0'5.2'5.0'VARIES2.5'-5.1'4:12:11:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X3.6'4.0'3.6'Venable Creek Reach 3 - Typical Pool
995100010051010995100010051010121+50122+00122+50123+00123+50124+00124+50125+00125+50126+00EXISTING GROUNDCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1015102010251005100510101010101510151020102010251025103010301035TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB604+00605+00 121+00122+00123+00124+00125+001
0
0
5
1010
STA: 123+49VENABLE CREEKSTA: 605+06UT4CONFLUENCEVENABLE CREEKUT4REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 121+50
MATCH LINE - STA 126+00
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.6
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
9909951000100599099510001005126+00126+50127+00127+50128+00128+50129+00129+50130+00130+20EXISTING GROUNDCE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXXXXXXXXX9959951000
10001005100510101010101510151020102010251030103510401045TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TO
B
TOBTOB
TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB126+00127+00128+00129+00130+0099599510001005VENABLE CREEKREMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)PROPOSED BMP SEEDETAIL 3, SHEET 6.9MATCH LINE - STA 126+00
MATCH LINE - STA 130+20
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.7
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
980985990995980985990995130+20130+50131+00131+50132+00132+50133+00133+50134+00134+50134+70EXISTING GROUNDCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEFCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXXXXXXXXXXXX
X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX99
0
9909
9
5
99510001000100510051010101010151015102010201025TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TO
B
TOBT
O
B
TOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB TOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOB TOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB704+00
705+00130+00131+00132+00134+00985990990995995STA: 132+05VENABLE CREEKSTA: 704+20UT5CONFLUENCESTA: 132+44CONSERVATION EASEMENTINTERNAL CROSSINGSTA: 132+75CONSERVATION EASEMENTINTERNAL CROSSINGVENABLE CREEKUT5 REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)INSTALL PERMANENTFORD CROSSINGSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.10MATCH LINE - STA 130+20
MATCH LINE - STA
1
3
4
+
7
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.8
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
970975980985970975980985134+70135+00135+50136+00136+50137+00137+50138+00138+50139+00139+20EXISTING GROUNDCE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CECECECECE9859859909909959951000100510101015102098599099510009909951000100510101015102010251030 TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOB TOB
TOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB805+00134+00135+00136+00137+001
3
8
+
0
0
139+00980985985990990STA: 137+82VENABLE CREEKSTA: 805+52UT6CONFLUENCEUT6VENABLE CREEKDO NOT DISTURBMILL REMNANTSWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 134+70
MATCH LINE - STA 139+20
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.9
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
965970975980965970975980139+20139+50140+00140+50EXISTING GROUNDCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X985990995 1000975975980980985985990990 9959951000100510101015102010251030TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
T
O
B
TO
B TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB
TOBTOB141+2
5139+00140+00141+0
0 STA: 139+90VENABLE CREEKEND WORK REACH 4 - ENHANCEMENT IIVENABLE CREEKDO NOT DISTURBMILL REMNANTSREMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)MATCH LINE - STA 139+20Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.10
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Venable Creek
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.92.10UT2UT2AENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1030103510401045105010301035104010451050200+00200+50201+00201+50202+00202+50202+80-3.1%-3.0%-3.4%-4.4%-2.7%-3.7%-2.1%STA = 200+00ELEV = 1039.90STA = 200+26ELEV = 1039.09STA = 200+36ELEV = 1037.70STA = 200+41ELEV = 1037.70STA = 200+46ELEV = 1039.01STA = 200+69ELEV = 1038.30STA = 200+80ELEV = 1036.85STA = 200+83ELEV = 1036.85STA = 200+90
ELEV = 1038.12
STA = 201+15
ELEV = 1037.30STA = 201+32ELEV = 1035.84STA = 201+37ELEV = 1035.84STA = 201+49
ELEV = 1036.98
STA = 201+78
ELEV = 1035.73STA = 201+98ELEV = 1034.63STA = 202+05
ELEV = 1034.63
STA = 202+75
ELEV = 1034.00
STA = 202+19
ELEV = 1035.52
STA = 202+42
ELEV = 1034.68
STA = 202+49ELEV = 1033.69STA = 202+52ELEV = 1033.69STA = 202+57
ELEV = 1034.48
STA = 202+57
ELEV = 1034.48 PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX OUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OUXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTFO1
0
3
5
1
0
4
0
10
4
5
10
5
0
1
0
5
5
10
6
01045
1050OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
EXI
S
T
I
N
G

F
A
R
M

R
O
A
D
SILOAM ROADLITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH ROADFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)EXISTING FARM ROADTO BE RELOCATED200+00201+00202+00101+00
10
2
+
0
0
10
3
+
0
0
TOB
TOB EXISTING POWER POLEAND TELEPHONE BOXTO REMAIN OUTSIDE EASEMENT.PROTECT AS NECESSARY.C
R
-
C
R
CR-CH
CR-C
R10401
0
4
0
1
0
4
5
1
0
5
0
CR-C
H CR-CHCR-CRCR-CHCR-C
H
CR-CRSTA: 100+91VENABLE CREEKEND REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT ISTA: 103+02END REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT IBEGIN INTERNAL EASEMENT BREAKSTA: 200+00UT1BEGIN WORK - RESTORATIONSTA: 202+73END UT1 - RESTORATIONSTA: 102+38VENABLE CREEK REACH 2 - ENHANCEMENT ICR-CHU
T
1
VE
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
KEXISTING BOX CULVERTINV: 1039.83Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.11
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT1
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.3611.5'3.25'2.5'2.5'3.25'1.5'1.3'2.5:12.5
:1UT1 - Typical Riffle15.0'8.8'2.2'4.0'4:12:1VARIES2.2'-3.9'1:1 MAX1:1 MAX2.6'2.0'2.6'1.3'UT1 - Typical Pool
1070107510801085109010701075108010851090300+00300+50301+00301+50302+00EXISTING GROUND1075108010851090CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT21
0
8
0 10851090300+00301+00302+00STA: 300+56UT2BEGIN REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIMATCH LINE

-

S
T
A

3
0
2
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.12
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1055106010651070107510551060106510701075302+00302+50303+00303+50304+00EXISTING GROUND10751065107010
7
5
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT21080106510651070107010751055302+00303+00304+00MATCH LINE - STA 302+00
MATCH LINE - STA 304+00
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.13
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1040104510501055106010401045105010551060304+00304+50305+00305+50306+00306+00EXISTING GROUND1060106510701045104510501050105510551060CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT210501055304+00305+00306+00MATCH LINE - STA 304+00
MATCH LIN
E

-

S
T
A

3
0
6
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.14
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1025103010351040104510251030103510401045306+00306+50307+00307+50308+00308+20-4.9%STA = 307+98ELEV = 1029.75STA = 308+00ELEV = 1028.96STA = 308+08
ELEV = 1029.52
STA = 308+19
ELEV = 1028.99EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULL1035
1040 1045 10501055CECECE
CECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT2UT2A1030103510401
0
4
0
1040104510501055103010351040409+00306+00307+00CR-CHCR-CSCR-CSSTA: 307+98UT2END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATIONSTA: 409+33UT2AEND WORK - ENHANCEMENT IISTA: 308+71CONSERVATION EASEMENTINTERNAL CROSSINGMATCH LINE - STA 306+00
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

3
0
8
+
2
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.15
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.5.6'1.5'1.3'1.3'1.5'0.7'0.6'2.5:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical Riffle7.7'0.6'4.0'1.7'2.0'VARIES1.0'-2.1'2:11:1 MAX1:1 MAX1.5'1.1'1.5'4:17.5'3.5'0.5'3.5'VARIES1.0'-1.4'2.5:12.5
:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical PoolUT2 Reach 2 - Typical In-line Pool
1015102010251030103510151020102510301035308+20308+50309+00309+50310+00310+30-5.3%-5.3%-0.6%-6.1%-6.1%-6.3%-6.2%-4.9%-0.6%STA = 308+21ELEV = 1028.00STA = 308+28ELEV = 1028.58STA = 308+34ELEV = 1028.24STA = 308+35ELEV = 1027.40STA = 308+41ELEV = 1027.92STA = 308+49ELEV = 1027.52STA = 308+50ELEV = 1026.73STA = 308+58ELEV = 1027.41STA = 308+97ELEV = 1027.18STA = 309+12
ELEV = 1027.06
STA = 309+27
ELEV = 1026.19STA = 309+33ELEV = 1025.00STA = 309+59
ELEV = 1024.52STA = 309+77ELEV = 1022.70STA = 309+86
ELEV = 1022.98
STA = 309+98
ELEV = 1022.24STA = 309+99ELEV = 1021.49STA = 310+29
ELEV = 1020.48
STA = 309+39
ELEV = 1025.52STA = 309+44ELEV = 1024.41STA = 309+54ELEV = 1024.00STA = 309+49
ELEV = 1024.98
STA = 309+76
ELEV = 1023.43
STA = 310+06
ELEV = 1021.81STA = 310+09ELEV = 1020.96STA = 310+16
ELEV = 1021.29STA = 309+05ELEV = 1026.34STA = 309+07ELEV = 1026.34
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULLPROPOSED CULVERTSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.10102510301035CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX CE-IX
UT21030102
5 10301035104010301035309+00310+00102510301030CR-CHCR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CRFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)PROPOSED CULVERT CROSSINGSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.10STA: 308+71CONSERVATION EASEMENTINTERNAL CROSSINGSTA: 308+92CONSERVATION EASEMENTINTERNAL CROSSINGSTABILIZE POOL WITH RIP RAP1020
MATCH LINE - STA 308+20
MAT
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

3
1
0
+
3
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.16
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.365.6'1.5'1.3'1.3'1.5'0.7'0.6'2.5:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical Riffle7.7'0.6'4.0'1.7'2.0'VARIES1.0'-2.1'2:11:1 MAX1:1 MAX1.5'1.1'1.5'4:17.5'3.5'0.5'3.5'VARIES1.0'-1.4'2.5:12.5
:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical PoolUT2 Reach 2 - Typical In-line Pool
1010101510201025103010101015102010251030310+30310+50311+00311+50311+70-6.2%-7.8%-5.9%-6.0%-3.2%STA = 310+33ELEV = 1019.57STA = 310+41ELEV = 1019.96STA = 310+62ELEV = 1018.63STA = 310+65ELEV = 1017.85STA = 310+75ELEV = 1018.05
STA = 310+90
ELEV = 1016.90
STA = 310+96
ELEV = 1016.10
STA = 311+06
ELEV = 1016.46
STA = 311+24
ELEV = 1015.39STA = 311+27ELEV = 1014.95STA = 311+32
ELEV = 1015.39
STA = 311+69ELEV = 1013.22EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED BANKFULLPROPOSED GRADEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1025CE CE CE CE CE CEUT21015101510151020
115+00
116+00311+69310+00
311+001025CR-CS CR-CS CR-CSCR-CSCR-CSCR-CHCR-CSFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)EXISTING BARN TO BE REMOVEDFROM CONSERVATION EASEMENTREMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)STA: 311+61UT2END REACH 2 - RESTORATIONSTA: 115+65VENABLE CREEKCONFLUENCE10201015
VENABLE CREEK
MATCH LINE - STA 310+30
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.17
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.365.6'1.5'1.3'1.3'1.5'0.7'0.6'2.5:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical Riffle7.7'0.6'4.0'1.7'2.0'VARIES1.0'-2.1'2:11:1 MAX1:1 MAX1.5'1.1'1.5'4:17.5'3.5'0.5'3.5'VARIES1.0'-1.4'2.5:12.5
:1UT2 Reach 2 - Typical PoolUT2 Reach 2 - Typical In-line Pool
1080108510901095110010801085109010951100400+00400+50401+00401+50402+00EXISTING GROUNDX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
108510901095CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
TOBTOBTOB
TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBUT2A1085
10851090
1
0
9
0
10901090109510
9
5110011001105111011151120400+00401+00402+00STA: 400+40UT2ABEGIN WORK - ENHANCEMENT IIMATCH LI
N
E

-

S
T
A

4
0
2
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.18
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2A
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1065107010751080108510651070107510801085402+00402+50403+00403+50404+00EXISTING GROUND1080108010851085109010901095CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT2A108510851090109010751075402+00403+004
0
4
+
0
0
MATCH LINE - STA 402+00
MATCH LINE - STA 404+0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.19
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2A
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1053105510601065107010531055106010651070404+00404+50405+00405+50406+00EXISTING GROUNDCETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT2A10601065107010751080108510901060106510701075106010651070404+00405+00406+00MATCH LINE - STA 404+00
MATCH LIN
E

-

S
T
A

4
0
6
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.20
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2A
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1035104010451050105510351040104510501055406+00406+00406+50407+00407+50408+00408+20EXISTING GROUND10601065107010751080CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT2A1060 10501050105510551060104010401060406+00407+00408+00MATCH LINE - STA 406+00
MATCH LI
N
E

-

S
T
A

4
0
8
+
2
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.21
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2A
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1025103010351040104510251030103510401045408+20408+50409+00409+40EXISTING GROUND1035104010451050CECETO
B
TOBT
O
B
TOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOBT
O
B
TOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTO
BTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT
2 UT2A10351040104010401030103510401045105010551060408+00409+0030
7
+
0
0
CR-CHCR-CSSTA: 307+98UT2END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATIONSTA: 409+33UT2AEND WORK - ENHANCEMENT IIMATCH LINE - STA 408+20
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.22
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2A
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1040104510501055106010401045105010551060502+00502+50503+00503+50504+00EXISTING GROUND10501050105510551060CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
UT3105510551060502+00503+00504+00MATCH LINE - STA 502+00
MATCH LINE - STA 504+00
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.24
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT3
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
1030103510401045105010301035104010451050504+00504+50505+00505+50506+00EXISTING GROUND10451050CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT3504+00505+00506+00MATCH LINE - STA 504+00
MATCH L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

5
0
6
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.25
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT3
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
1015102010251030103510151020102510301035506+00506+50507+00507+50508+00508+20EXISTING GROUND10351040104510401045CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOB TOBTOBUT31030103010251025506+00507+00508+00CR-CHMATCH LINE - STA 506+00
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

5
0
8
+
2
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.26
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT3
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
1010101510201025103010101015102010251030508+20508+50509+00509+50510+00510+30-4.6%-4.7%-4.7%-4.5%-4.7%-4.4%-4.2%STA = 508+29ELEV = 1021.45STA = 508+33ELEV = 1020.68STA = 508+41ELEV = 1021.00STA = 508+55ELEV = 1020.15STA = 508+56ELEV = 1019.70STA = 508+65ELEV = 1019.97STA = 508+85ELEV = 1018.89STA = 508+87ELEV = 1018.39STA = 508+94ELEV = 1018.54STA = 508+96ELEV = 1018.01STA = 509+01ELEV = 1018.44
STA = 509+21
ELEV = 1017.52STA = 509+24ELEV = 1016.82STA = 509+30
ELEV = 1017.18
STA = 509+45
ELEV = 1016.50STA = 509+47ELEV = 1015.84STA = 509+55
ELEV = 1016.15
STA = 509+71
ELEV = 1015.41STA = 509+71ELEV = 1014.81STA = 509+78
ELEV = 1015.16
STA = 509+87
ELEV = 1014.74STA = 509+89ELEV = 1014.05STA = 509+97
ELEV = 1014.35
STA = 510+05
ELEV = 1013.93STA = 510+07ELEV = 1013.29STA = 510+15
ELEV = 1013.59
STA = 510+24
ELEV = 1013.21STA = 510+26ELEV = 1012.59EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULLCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT310251025101
5
10
1
5
1015
1
0
2
0
1
0
2
5 103010351020102510301035104010451050508+00509+00510+00101510201025CR-CHFILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)STA: 508+31UT3END REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN REACH 2 - RESTORATIONCR-CRCR-CHCR-CRCR-CHCR-CRCR-CRCR-CR
MATCH LINE - STA 508+20
MATCH LINE - STA 510+30Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.27
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT3
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.364.9'1.25'1.2'1.2'1.25'2.5:10.5'UT3 Reach 2 - Typical Riffle6.4'3.0'0.4'3.0'VARIES0.8'-1.2'2.5:1UT3 Reach 2 - Typical In-line Pool
1005101010151020102510051010101510201025510+30510+50511+00511+50-3.3%-2.6%-4.1%-4.7%STA = 510+35ELEV = 1012.80STA = 510+38ELEV = 1012.22STA = 510+46ELEV = 1012.50STA = 510+64ELEV = 1011.78STA = 510+68ELEV = 1011.18STA = 510+77
ELEV = 1011.52
STA = 510+90
ELEV = 1010.86STA = 510+99ELEV = 1010.22STA = 511+02ELEV = 1010.22STA = 511+08
ELEV = 1010.46
STA = 511+45
ELEV = 1007.24 EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULLX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X CECECECECECECECECEUT3VENABLE CREEK1015101510
1
0
10
1
0 1015119+00510+00511+001015
FILL EXISTING CHANNEL (TYP)REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)STA: 511+37UT3END REACH 2 - RESTORATIONSTA: 118+81VENABLE CREEKCONFLUENCECR-CRCR-CRCR-CRCR-CS1010
MATCH LINE - STA 510+30
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.28
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT3
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.364.9'1.25'1.2'1.2'1.25'2.5:10.5'UT3 Reach 2 - Typical Riffle6.4'3.0'0.4'3.0'VARIES0.8'-1.2'2.5:1UT3 Reach 2 - Typical In-line Pool
1025103010351040104510501055106010251030103510401045105010551060600+00600+50601+00601+50602+00STA = 600+00ELEV = 1057.82STA = 600+06ELEV = 1054.07STA = 600+11ELEV = 1055.06STA = 600+22ELEV = 1052.06STA = 600+16ELEV = 1051.06STA = 600+28ELEV = 1048.09STA = 600+33ELEV = 1049.06STA = 600+38ELEV = 1045.41STA = 600+43ELEV = 1046.17STA = 600+49ELEV = 1042.18STA = 600+55ELEV = 1043.06STA = 600+56ELEV = 1041.62STA = 600+62ELEV = 1041.00
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED PROFILE103510351040104010451050105510601065
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB TOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOB
TOB
T
O
B
TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBUT410351040104510501055106010651045600+00601+00602+00PROPOSED BMP SEEDETAIL 1, SHEET 6.9104510501055STA: 600+58UT4BEGIN WORK - ENHANCEMENT IIMATCH LINE - STA 602+00
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'5'10'15'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.29
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT4
Stream Plan and ProfileSheet IndexVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
1010101510201025103010101015102010251030602+00602+50603+00603+50604+00-9.0%STA = 603+30
ELEV = 1018.27
STA = 603+68ELEV = 1014.46STA = 603+71ELEV = 1013.99STA = 603+73
ELEV = 1014.46
STA = 603+99ELEV = 1011.59EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULL103510401
0
2
0
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBT
O
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT41
0
1
5
1
0
2
0 1025103010351020102510301035104010451020
1025
602+00
603+00604+00
1
0
1
5CR-RCSTA: 603+28BEGIN ROCK CASCADESEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.3MATCH LINE - STA 602+00
MATCH LINE - STA 604+00Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.30
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT4
Stream Plan and ProfileSheet IndexVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.3.7'1.25'1.20'1.25'0.5'2.5:12.5
:14.8'1.8'1.2'1.8'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X VARIES1.0'-2.0'UT4 - Typical RiffleUT4 - Typical In-line Pool
99510001005101010159951000100510101015604+00604+50605+00605+20-10.7%-11.4%-6.5%STA = 604+02ELEV = 1011.09STA = 604+04ELEV = 1011.59STA = 604+45ELEV = 1006.44STA = 604+47ELEV = 1007.00STA = 604+75
ELEV = 1003.00STA = 604+78ELEV = 1002.40STA = 604+80ELEV = 1003.00STA = 605+06ELEV = 999.82STA = 604+42
ELEV = 1007.00 PROPOSED BANKFULLEXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEX
X
X
X
X
X
X X X X X
X
X
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1000
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
10
0
5
1
0
1
0
1010
1
0
1
5
1015 10201020
1025
1030 CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETO
B
TOB
TOB
TOB
TO
B
TO
B TO
B
TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB TOB
TOBTOBTOB
TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB
T
O
B
TOB
TOB
T
O
B
TOB
TOB
TOBUT4VENABL
E

C
R
E
E
K
10151020 10251010
101510201025
123+0
0
124+0
0604+00605+00100510101015CR-RCCR-RCSTA: 604+98UT4END WORK - ENHANCEMENT IISTA: 123+48VENABLE CREEKCONFLUENCESTA: 603+28BEGIN ROCK CASCADESEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.3MATCH LINE - STA 604+00Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.31
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT4
Stream Plan and ProfileSheet IndexVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.363.7'1.25'1.20'1.25'0.5'2.5:12.5
:14.8'1.8'1.2'1.8'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X VARIES1.0'-2.0'UT4 - Typical RiffleUT4 - Typical In-line Pool
1000100510101015102010251030103510401045105010001005101010151020102510301035104010451050700+00700+50701+00701+50702+00702+50702+60EXISTING GROUND101510201025103010351040CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT51010101510201025700+00701+00702+00STA: 700+00UT5BEGIN WORK - ENHANCEMENT IIM
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

-

S
T
A

7
0
2
+
6
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'5'10'15'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.32
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT5
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.
9889909951000100598899099510001005702+60703+00703+50704+00704+50705+00705+25EXISTING GROUNDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX
X
X
X X
XXXXXXXXXX
X
X
10051005 1010101010101010101510151020102510301035
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT5VENABLE CREEK1010990
9
9
5
132+00703+00704+00705+00705+22REMOVE FENCINGWITHIN EASEMENT (TYP)FILL EXISTING CHANNEL.DIVERT FLOW PATH TO RIGHTCHANNELSTA: 705+18UT5END WORK - ENHANCEMENT IISTA: 130+05VENABLE CREEKCONFLUENCECR-RC995MATCH LINE - STA 702+60
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.33
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT5
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
1010101510201025103010101015102010251030799+90800+00800+50801+00801+50802+00STA = 799+93ELEV = 1027.64STA = 799+96ELEV = 1025.14STA = 799+99ELEV = 1025.14STA = 800+04ELEV = 1026.14STA = 800+05ELEV = 1023.64STA = 800+09ELEV = 1023.64STA = 800+14ELEV = 1024.64STA = 800+16ELEV = 1022.14STA = 800+20ELEV = 1022.14STA = 800+25ELEV = 1023.14STA = 800+27ELEV = 1020.64STA = 800+30ELEV = 1020.64STA = 800+36ELEV = 1021.64
EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED PROFILEPROPOSED BANKFULLOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE10201025CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOB
TOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB
TO
B
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBUT6101510151020102510301035799+77800+00801+00802+001025EXISTING WELL.PROTECT AS NEEDED.STA: 801+19UT6 - REACH 1BEGIN EHANCEMENT II799+77800+00801+00802+00799+77800+00801+00802+00STA: 799+93BEGIN SPSCSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.9MATCH LI
N
E

-

S
T
A

8
0
2
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.34
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT6
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.
990995100010051010990995100010051010802+00802+50803+00803+50804+00-2.4%STA = 803+32
ELEV = 998.46
STA = 803+73ELEV = 996.52STA = 803+68
ELEV = 997.59STA = 803+74ELEV = 996.52STA = 803+78
ELEV = 997.32 EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULLOUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE10151020
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECETOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOBTOB
TOBTOB
TOBT
O
B
TOBTOBUT69
9
5 10001005101010001005101010151020802+008
0
3
+
0
0
804+00995 CR-RCSTA: 803+32END UT6 REACH 1 - ENHANCEMENT IIBEGIN UT6 REACH 2 - RESTORATION802+008
0
3
+
0
0
804+00802+008
0
3
+
0
0
804+00FILL EXISTING CHANNELMATCH LINE - STA 802+00
MATCH LINE - S
T
A

8
0
4
+
0
0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N
0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.35
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT6
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.3.7'1.25'1.20'1.25'0.5'2.5:12.5
:14.8'1.8'1.2'1.8'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X VARIES1.0'-2.0'UT6 - Typical RiffleUT6 - Typical In-line Pool
977980985990995977980985990995804+00804+50805+00805+50805+70-13.9%-9.8%-12.4%STA = 804+30ELEV = 991.75STA = 805+02ELEV = 983.10STA = 804+11ELEV = 993.62STA = 804+51ELEV = 989.53STA = 804+78ELEV = 986.36STA = 805+22ELEV = 980.76STA = 805+36
ELEV = 979.18 STA = 804+26ELEV = 992.78STA = 804+08ELEV = 994.59STA = 804+46ELEV = 990.65
STA = 804+74
ELEV = 987.70
STA = 804+98
ELEV = 984.44
STA = 805+19
ELEV = 981.92 STA = 804+12ELEV = 993.62STA = 804+15ELEV = 994.12STA = 804+31ELEV = 991.75STA = 804+34ELEV = 992.28STA = 804+52ELEV = 989.53STA = 804+56
ELEV = 990.15
STA = 804+79ELEV = 986.36STA = 804+82
ELEV = 987.20
STA = 805+04ELEV = 983.10STA = 805+08
ELEV = 983.94STA = 805+23ELEV = 980.76STA = 805+26
ELEV = 981.42EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULL9859859
9
0
990
9959951000
CECECECECECECECECECE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
C
E
C
E
C
E
TOB
TO
B
T
O
B
TOB TOBTOB
T
O
B
TOB
TOB
TOB TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB
TOB TOB TOBUT6VENA
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K 99510001005138+00804+00805+00805+52980
985
990
995 CR-RCSTA: 805+37UT6END REACH 2 - RESTORATIONSTA: 137+82VENABLE CREEKCONFLUENCECR-RC804+00805+00805+52804+00805+00805+52MATCH LINE - STA 804+00
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.36
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT6
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.36ENHANCEMENT II TREATMENT:1.TREAT INVASIVE VEGETATION.2.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING - SEEPLANTING PLANS.3.EXCLUDE CATTLE ACCESS.4.SELECTIVE BANK GRADING.3.7'1.25'1.20'1.25'0.5'2.5:12.5
:14.8'1.8'1.2'1.8'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X VARIES1.0'-2.0'UT6 - Typical RiffleUT6 - Typical In-line Pool
10051010101510201005101010151020100+00100+50100+80-8.1%-1.1%STA = 100+21ELEV = 1010.24
STA = 100+80
ELEV = 1005.21
STA = 100+62
ELEV = 1006.92STA = 100+59ELEV = 1006.07STA = 100+56ELEV = 1006.07STA = 100+50
ELEV = 1007.27 EXISTING GROUNDPROPOSED GRADEPROPOSED BANKFULLXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
TOBTOBTOBTOBTOBVENA
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
10101010119+
0
0120+001
0
1
0100+00100+80UT2BCR-RCCR-RC1010Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'10'20'30'(HORIZONTAL)N0'2'4'6'(VERTICAL)X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Profiles Tribs.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
2.37
09.23.2020 Sheet IndexHoney Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT2B
Stream Plan and ProfileVe
n
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
kUT1UT3
UT6UT5UT42.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.212.22UT2UT2A2.232.242.252.262.272.282.292.302.312.322.332.342.352.362.373.7'1.25'1.20'1.25'0.5'2.5:12.5
:14.8'1.8'1.2'1.8'1:1 MAX1:
1
M
A
X VARIES1.0'-2.0'UT2B - Typical RiffleUT2B - Typical In-line Pool
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Planting Lists
Planting Plan Streambank PlantingRiparian PlantingRiparian SeedingTemporary SeedingPasture SeedingSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.8 FOR STREAMBANK PLANTING.Shaded Supplemental PlantingSoil AmendmentsRiparian Planting ZoneSpeciesCommon NameMax Spacing(ft)Indiv.Spacing (ft)Min.CaliperStratumPercentageWetlandIndicator CodePlatanus occidentalisSycamore126-120.25"Canopy15%FACWMorus rubra*Red Mulberry126-120.25"Subcanopy7%FACUDiospyros virginianaPersimmon126-120.25"Canopy10%FACPrunus serotinaBlack Cherry126-120.25"Canopy10%FACUQuercus rubraNorthern Red Oak126-120.25"Canopy10%FACUOxydendrum arboreum*Sourwood126-120.25"Subcanopy3%UPLQuercus albaWhite Oak126-120.25"Canopy10%FACUAsimina triloba*Paw Paw126-120.25"Subcanopy4%FACUlmus rubraSlippery Elm126-120.25"Canopy5%FACAcer negundoBoxelder126-120.25"Canopy10%FACHamamelis virginiana*Witch Hazel126-120.25"Subcanopy4%FACUEuonymus americanus*AmericanStrawberry Bush126-120.25"Shrub3%FACLiriodendron tulipiferaTulip Tree126-120.25"Canopy4%FACUCarya cordiformisBitternut Hickory126-120.25"Canopy5%FACU* Subcanopy species - not held to monitoring height requirementsStreambank Planting ZoneLive Stakes: Streams with > 8' TOB widthSpeciesCommon NameMaxSpacing (ft)Indiv.Spacning (ft)Min. SizeStratumPercentageWetlandIndicator CodeSalix nigraBlack Willow63' - 6'0.5" cal.Canopy35%OBLSalix sericeaSilky Willow63' - 6'0.5" cal.Shrub25%OBLCornus amomumSilky dogwood63' - 6'0.5" cal.Shrub20%FACWSambucus canadensisElderberry63' - 6'0.5" cal.Shrub10%FACPhysocarpos opulifoliusNinebark63' - 6'0.5" cal.Shrub10%FACWTotal100%Live Stakes: Streams with < 8' TOB widthSalix sericeaSilky Willow86-80.5" cal.Shrub40%OBLCornus amomumSilky Dogwood86-80.5" cal.Shrub20%FACWSambucus canadensisElderberry86-80.5" cal.Shrub20%FACPhysocarpos opulifoliusNinebark86-80.5" cal.Shrub20%FACWTotal100%Herbaceous PlugsJuncus effususCommon Rush441.0" - 2.0" plugHerb50%FACWCarex luridaShallow Sedge441.0" - 2.0" plugHerb20%OBLCarex crinitaFringed Sedge441.0" - 2.0" plugHerb15%OBLCyperus strigosusStraw-colored Flatsedge441.0" - 2.0" plugHerb15%FACWTotal100%Permanent Riparian SeedingPure Live SeedApproved DateSpecies NameCommon NameStratumDensity(lbs/acre)WetlandIndicatorCodeAll YearSchizachyriumscopariumLittle BluestemHerb1.5FACUAll YearPanicum virgatumSwitchgrassHerb1.0FACAll YearSorghastrum nutansIndiangrassHerb1.5FACUAll YearPanicumdichotimiflorumSmoothPannicgrassHerb1.0FACWAll YearPanicum ancepsBeaked PanicgrassHerb1.0FACAll YearPanicum clandestinumDeertongueHerb3.0FACAll YearElymus virginicusVirginia Wild RyeHerb3.0FACWAll YearTripsacum dactyloidesEasternGammagrassHerb1.0FACWAll YearJuncus tenuisPath RushHerb0.6FACAll YearJuncus effususSoft RushHerb0.4FACWAll YearCarex vulpinoideaFox SedgeHerb1.0OBLAll YearCoreopsis lanceolataLanceleafCoreopsisHerb1.0FACUAll YearBidens aristosaBur-MarigoldHerb1.0FACWAll YearRudbeckia hirtaBlackeyed SusanHerb1.0FACUAll YearChamaecristafasciculata var.fasciculataPartridge PeaHerb1.0FACUAll YearAchillea millefoliumCommon YarrowHerb1.0FACUTemporary Seeding and MulchApproved DateTypePlanting Rate(lbs/acre)Jan 1 - May 1Rye Grain (Secale cereale)120Ladino Clover5Crimson Clover5Straw Mulch4000May 1 - Aug 15German Millet (Setaria italica)50Ladino Clover5Crimson Clover540004000Aug 15 - Dec 31Rye Grain (Secale cereale)120Crimson Clover540004000Pasture SeedingPure Live Seeding (42 lbs/acre)Species NameCommon NameDensity (lbs/acre)Dactylis qlomerataOrchard Grass20Trifolium pratenseRed Clover5Trifolium repensLadino Clover5Herbaceous ZoneSpeciesCommon NameIndiv.SpacingPercentageWetlandIndicator CodeJuncus effususCommon Rush4 ft.40%FACWCarex luridaLurid Sedge4 ft.15%OBLCarex crinitaFringed Sedge4 ft.15%OBLScirpus cyperinusWoolgrass4 ft.15%FACWSagittaria latifoliaBroadleaf Arrowhead4 ft.15%OBLShaded Bare RootsSpeciesCommon NameMax Spacing(ft)Indiv.Spacning (ft)Min. CaliperSizeStratumPercentageWetlandIndicator CodePlatanus occidentalisSycamore2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy10%FACWCarya cordiformisBitternut Hickory2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy5%FACULiriodendron tulipiferaTulip Poplar2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy5%FACUCarpinus caroliniana*Ironwood2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy4%FACDiospyros virginianaPersimmon2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy10%FACMorus rubra*Red Mulberry2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy5%FACUNyssa sylvaticaBlack Gum2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy5%FACEunoymus americanus*American StrawberryBush2512-250.25" - 1.0"Shrub4%FACCalycanthus floridus*Sweetshrub2512-250.25" - 1.0"Shrub4%FACUHamamelis virginiana*Witch Hazel2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy7%FACUQuercus rubraNorthern Red Oak2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy10%FACUFagus grandifoliaAmerican Beech2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy5%FACUQuercus albaWhite Oak2512-250.25" - 1.0"Canopy10%FACULindera benzoin*Spicebush2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy4%FACCornus florida*Flowering Dogwood2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy5%FACUOzydendron arboreum*Sourwood2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy4%UPLIlex opaca*American Holly2512-250.25" - 1.0"Subcanopy3%FACU* Subcanopy species - not held to monitoring height requirementsSoil AmendmentsTo Be Installed Prior to Subsoil Plowing - See Section 7.4 ofSpecificationsZoneAmendmentRate (lbs/acre)All planting areasHumic Plus200Areas with >0.5 feet ofcut or fillTennessee BrownPhosphate*50* to be applied in addition to Humic PlusHerbaceous Zone
OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEFO OUOUOUOUOU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUOUOUOUOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUETFOOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEFCE-IXCE-IXFCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECEC
E CECECECE CE CE CECECE
CECECECECECECECE CECECECECECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECECE CE CESHEET 3
.5SHEET 3
.6SHEET 3.3SHEET 3
.4SHEET 3
.7UT1VENABLE CREEKUT2UT3UT4UT5UT6SILOAM ROADLITTLE MOUNTAINCHURCH ROADVENABLE FARM ROADUT2UT2ALODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLOD LOD
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLOD LOD
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LODLOD
LODLOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODL
O
D LODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD
L
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLODLODLODLOD LODN/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.2
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Planting Overview
Planting PlanN0'150'300'450'(HORIZONTAL)
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUEFO
OUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OUTFOCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IXF
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEUT1SILOAM
ROADLITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH ROADVENABLE CREEKLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.3
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Planting Plan
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831 N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 3.5MATCHLINE SHEET 3.4N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CECECECEUT3
VENABLE CREEKSILOAM ROADVENABLE FARM ROAD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.4
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
Planting Plan N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 3.5MATCHLINE SHEET 3.3MATCHLINE SHEET 3.6N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075
CE-IXCE-IX CE-IXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CEUT2VENABLE CREEKUT2UT2ALODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLOD
LODLOD LODLODLOD LODLODLODLOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLOD LODLODLOD LODLODLODLOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.5
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
Planting Plan NMATCHLINE SHEET 3.4
MATCHLINE SHEET 3.6MATCHLINE SHEET 3.30'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)EXCLUDE SYCAMORE ANDBLACK CHERRY UPSTREAMOF THIS LOCATIONN/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEUT4UT5V
E
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
VENAB
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
LODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD
LOD
L
O
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LOD
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.6
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
Planting PlanN MATCHLINE SHEET 3.7MATCHLINE SHEET 3.40'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 3.5N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEF CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE
CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECEUT6VENABLE CREEK LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Planting.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
3.7
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
Planting Plan N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 3.6N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
4.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Spoil Area NOTES:1.STABILIZE WITH TEMPORARY AND PASTURE SEED.2.FILL GULLY AS NEEDED.0'20'40'60'(HORIZONTAL)NOUOUOUOUOUOU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
1
0
6
+
0
0 FILL GULLYTO LEVELTOPOGRAPHY1050 105510601065107010751080108510901095LITTLE
M
O
U
N
T
AI
N
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D
V
E
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
LODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE
OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUEFO OUOUOUOU OU OU OU OU OU OU
OUOUOUOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUETFOXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEFFSHEET 5
.4
SHEET 5.2SHEET 5
.5TTTSHEET 5.2SHEET 5
.3SHEET 5
.6N/FJACK S. FLETCHER and wife,GLENDA KAYE H. FLETCHERD.B. 337, PG. 369PIN: 5928-60-3034N/FMICHAEL LEE VENABLEand wife,PHYLLIS ANN VENABLED.B. 612, PG. 686D.B. 585, PG. 703PIN: 5927-67-1505N/FRANDY DEAN VENABLE and wife,DAPHNE VENABLED.B. 1164, PG. 942P.B. 23, PG. 109andUNRECORDED MAPS BYROBERT E. REIF, L-1516C-368(A), C-368(D), & C-998(B)c/o BOWMAN-BUNN, PCMT. AIRY, NCPIN: 5927-67-7679N/FBILLIE LEE WHITTD.B. 1012, PG. 452P.B. 30, PG. 172PIN: 5927-78-7923N/FMONTY LEE SIMPSON and wife,DELORES DAWN SIMPSOND.B. 720, PG. 914andUNRECORDED MAP BYROBERT E. REIF, L-1516C-368(E)c/o BOWMAN-BUNN, PCMT. AIRY, NCPIN: 5927-78-4648UT1VENABLE CREEKUT2UT3UT4UT5UT6SILOAM ROADLITTLE MOUNTAINCHURCH ROADVENABLE CREEKVENABLE CREEKVENABLE FARM ROAD11251150
1175
120012251250
1275
1
1
7
5 12001225125012751
1
5
0 1175120012251
2
5
0
1100
11
0
0 11001125
1125 112511
5
0
1150 11501
1
7
5 11751
1
7
5
12009759751000
100
0
10001
0
0
0 102510251
0
2
5 1025102510251025
1
0
2
5 10251
0
2
5
105010501050
1
0
5
0 10501
0
5
0
10501050107510751075
1075107
5
1
1
0
0
11
0
0
110011251150UT2UT2AUT2BN/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069[X][X]TT[X][X][X][X]TLOD
LOD
LO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLODLOD LOD
L
O
D
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LODLODLODLOD LOD
LODLOD
LOD LODLODLOD LODLOD
LOD LODLO
DLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLO
D
LODTSheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'200'400'600'(HORIZONTAL)NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Overview.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Overview
Erosion and Sediment Control 24-Hour Erosion Control Contact:Aaron Earley, PEWildlands Engineering, Inc.1430 S. Mint St., Suite 104Charlotte, NC 28203704-819-0848Limits of Disturbance: 16.3 AcresProject ID: TBDNotes:1. The contractor shall maintain erosion and sediment control devicesin accordance with the appropriate city and state erosion andsediment control ordinances.2. Ground stabilization shall must be established within 7 days onperimeter areas and slopes steeper than 3:1, and within 14 days onall other areas.3. The contractor shall prevent standing water due to construction.4. Disturbed areas shall be seeded and mulched at the discretion of theEngineer.5. The contractor shall follow the erosion control measures as shownon sheets unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.6. The contractor shall work in the dry at all locations. When required,pump around use shall be determined by the contractor based theconstruction sequence and Detail 3, Sheet 6.5.7. Straw wattles to be installed on an as needed basis along the top ofthe active stream channel banks where overland sediment is reachingthe channel. This shall be directed by the engineer in the field.8. All construction traffic to use crossings as show in plans.9. All wetlands outside of limits of disturbance and permitted impactareas shall be avoided.10. All disturbance within 25' of top of bank must be stabilized by theend of the day.11. Efforts shall be made by the contractor to maintain a minimumdistance of 25' between temporary stockpiles and proposed streamtop of banks.12. Spoil areas shall have slopes no steeper than 2:1.13. Straw wattles shall be installed along top of stream banks toprevent sediment from disturbed upland areas from washing intostreams.
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUEFO
OUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OUTFO
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IXF
SAFSAFUT1SILOAM ROADLITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH ROADLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODL
O
D
LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD10401050106010701080109011001110VENABLE CREEK1050106010701080109011001
0
9
0
1100
1060
1070
108010901100 [X][X][X]TNX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Sheets.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.2
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
UT1 and Venable Creek
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 5.4MATCHLINE SHEET 5.3PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.6Erosion and Sediment Control PROPOSED SPOIL AREAPROPOSED PUMP AROUND (TYP)SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.5INSTALL SAFETY FENCE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 6.6N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE
CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CECECE
SAF SAF
SA
FUT3
VENABLE CREEKT[X][X][X][X][X][X][X][X]LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLO
D
LO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LODLODLODLOD
LODSILOAM ROADVENABLE FARM ROAD
1
1
0
0
1
0
5
0 106010601060107010701
0701080 108010801090 109010901100110011001110
111011101120
10701080109011001040
1050
1060
1070
1040
1050
1060 107010701070NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Sheets.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.3
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 5.4 MATCHLINE SHEET 5.5MATCHLINE SHEET 5.2UT3
Erosion and Sediment ControlPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.6STAGING/STOCKPILE AREAPROPOSED BMPSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.9N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECE-IXCE-IX CE-IXSAFSAFSAFSAF SAFSAFSAFSAF SAF SAF
SAFUT2VENABLE CREEKUT2UT2ATTLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LODLOD LODLODLOD LODLODLODLOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD10301040
10401050
1
0
5
0
1
0
6
01060
1
0
7
01070
1
0
8
01080
1
0
9
01090
1
1
0
0
11001
1
0
0110011001100 1
1
1
0
11101110
111011101110111011101
1
2
0
112
0
1120
1120112011201130
113
0
1130
1130113011301140
114
011401140 1150115
0105010601070108010901100111011201130114010301040105010601070 1040UT2B
NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Sheets.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.4
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
MATCHLINE SHEET 5.3
MATCHLINE SHEET 5.5MATCHLINE SHEET 5.20'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)UT2, UT2A, and Venable Creek
Erosion and Sediment ControlPERMANENT CROSSINGCONSTRUCT FARM ROADSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.12PROPOSED PUMP AROUND (TYP)SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.5N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECE
CECE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CEUT4
UT5V
E
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
VENAB
L
E

C
R
E
E
K[X][X][X][X][X][X][X][X][X]LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD
LOD
L
O
D
L
O
D
LO
D
LO
D
LOD
LO
D LOD
LOD
LOD10001010
1020
1030
1030
1040
1040
1050
1050
1060
1060
107010701070107010801080109010901100110011101110
1010
102010301040105010601070
10801090
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
4
0
1050
105010601060
107010701080108010901090110
0
110011
1
0
11101080
NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Sheets.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.5
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831MATCHLINE SHEET 5.6MATCHLINE SHEET 5.30'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 5.4UT4, UT5, and Venable Creek
Erosion and Sediment ControlPROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.6STAGING/STOCKPILE AREAPROPOSED BMPSEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.9PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.6PROPOSED PUMP AROUNDSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.5N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301
OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECEF CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXUT6VENABLE CREEK
[X][X][X][X][X][X][X][X]TLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLO
D
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLOD10001010
1020
1030
1040
1050
1060
1070
1020103010401050
1060107010801090110011001080109011001100
980
980
990
990
1000
1000
1
0
1
0
10101020
10201020102010301030
10301030103010401040
10401040104010501050
105010501050106010601
0
6
0
1060 10601
0
7
0
1070107010701070
1080
108010801080
10901090
110011001
1
1
0111011201120 NX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - ESC Sheets.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
5.6
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-08310'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 5.5UT6 and Venable Creek
Erosion and Sediment Control STAGING/STOCKPILE AREAPROPOSED BMPSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.9RESTORE FARM ROADBEFORE DEMOBILIZATIONSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.12PROPOSED PUMP AROUNDSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.5N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North CarolinaChunky RiffleNot to ScaleWoody RiffleNot to Scale16.1Constructed RiffleNot to ScaleJazz RiffleNot to ScaleTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)RIFFLE BOTTOMWIDTH PERTYPICAL SECTIONSPlan ViewSEE PROFILEFOR LENGTH OF RIFFLEProfile A-A'Section B-B'TOP OF BANK (TYP)Section A-A'Plan ViewRIFFLE BOTTOMWIDTH PERTYPICAL SECTIONSSEE PROFILEFOR LENGTH OF RIFFLELOG EXPOSED 1" TO 3" ABOVEFINISHED RIFFLE ELEVATIONSection B-B'Plan ViewProfile View A-A'Log Section B-B'FLOW
A'BB'ATOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)SEE PROFILEFOR LENGTH OF RIFFLESection A-A'Plan ViewSection B-B'AA'BB'VARIES PERBASEFLOW3" MAX26.146.136.1RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILETOP OF BANK (TYP)HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILETAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILE3" TO 6" BRUSHY MATERIALBURIED INTO ROCKY SUBSTRATEMICRO POOL HABITATBEHIND LARGERWOODY DEBRISMICRO POOL HABITATBEHIND LARGER WOODY DEBRIS3" TO 6" DIAMETER WOODYDEBRIS WORKED INTO RIFFLESUBSTRATECLASS 1 STONEOR SALVAGEDONSITE BOULDERSMIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'TAIL OF RIFFLEELEVATION POINTPER PROFILEHEAD OF RIFFLEELEVATION POINTPER PROFILETOP OF BANK (TYP)RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILECLASS 1 STONEOR SALVAGEDONSITE BOULDERSMIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'CLASS 1 STONEOR SALVAGEDONSITE BOULDERSMIN 0.5'x1'x1.5'TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEROCK VANES MAYBE USED IN PLACEOF LOGS ATENGINEER'S DISCRETIONBURY INTO BANK 1' MIN. (TYP)BANKFULLHEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEBURY INTO BANK 5' MIN. (TYP)LOG STRUCTUREEXPOSED UNTILCENTER OF CHANNELSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALMIN.TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEHEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEFLOWAA'B'BHEAD OF RIFFLEFLOWTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)AB'BTOP OF BANK (TYP)RIFFLEA'TOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKFLOWFLOWTOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANK
EMBED/BURY INTO BANK 3' MINFLOWROCK TOE TO PROTECTBANKS ALONG RIFFLECR-WDCR-CHCR-JZCR-CRDetails NOTE:·IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BESUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.NOTES:·STRUCTURES SHOULD VARY IN SIZE AND TYPE WITHINEACH RIFFLE.·ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR LOGS AT ENGINEER'SDISCRETION.·LOG LENGTH AND PLACEMENT TO BE CONFIRMEDWITH ENGINEER IN FIELD DURING CONSTRUCTION.NOTES:·WOOD SHALL COMPRISE 20% TO 50% OF THE RIFFLESURFACE AREA.·WOODY MATERIAL SHOULD NOT PROTRUDE GREAT THAN3" ABOVE RIFFLE BED.·BRUSH SHOULD BE PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO CHANNELAT UP TO A 15% ANGLE DOWNSTREAM.·IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BESUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.·BRUSH CUTTERS OR OTHER DEVICE MUST BE USED TOENSURE PROTRUSION LIMITED TO TOLERANCE IN NOTE 2NOTE:·IF NECESSARY, SALVAGED ONSITE ROCK MAY BESUBSTITUTED WITH QUARRY ROCK OF SIMILAR SIZE.SALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIAL
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 202016.226.236.2Angled Log RiffleNot to ScalePlan ViewProfile View A-A'0% - 4%1/2 TO 2/3BANKFULLLog Section B-B'TOP OF BANKBURY INTO BANK 3' MIN. (TYP)POOLWIDTHPERTYPICALSECTIONFLOW
55° TO 65°(TYP)B'B0.5' MAX.5' MIN.(TYP)FLOWAY20°-30°SCOURPOOLFLOWPlan ViewTOE OF SLOPEFILTER FABRICEXTENDS 5' MIN.Section B-B'Section A-A'A'AB'BH
TOP OF BANKOFFSET HEADER LOG0.25' TO 0.5' UPSTREAMOF FOOTER LOGTOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)FLOWVANE ARMLENGTH(X)3%-5%A'THALWEGTOP OF BANKNORMAL WATERSURFACESALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIALNONWOVENFILTER FABRICTOE OFSLOPE12" DIAMETER ORGREATER (TYP)BANKFULLSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALHEADER LOGFOOTER LOGHEADER LOGFOOTER LOGNONWOVENFILTER FABRICSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALPLACE HEADER BOULDERTO PREVENT LOG FROM SHIFTING.INVERT ELEVATIONPER PROFILEEXCAVATE POOLPER PROFILEPLACE HEADER BOULDERSWITH 1' TO 2' CLEAR SPACEBETWEEN ROCKS.NO GAP BETWEEN FOOTERSHEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILETAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEHEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILETAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONPOINT PER PROFILEFLOW
Cascading RiffleNot to ScaleLog J-HookNot to Scale5' MIN.(TYP)5' MIN.(TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)SEE SECTION B-B' FORSIZELENGTH VARIES PER PLANSection A-A'TOP OF BANK (TYP)Section B-B'ABB'CLASS B STONE OR EQUAL (5-12")30-40% OF MATERIAL (MIN)2" MAXTAIL OF RIFFLEELEVATION POINTPER PROFILEHEAD OF RIFFLEELEVATION POINTPER PROFILE12" RIFFLE THICKNESS12-18" RIFFLE THICKNESSMUST CONTAIN AT LEAST 30% GRAVEL AND SAND FINESTO MAINTAIN FLOW AT SURFACE OF RIFFLE(REMAINDER OF MIX SHALL GRAVEL TO COBBLE SIZE)RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILESTONE TO ALSO BE WORKED INTOBANKS TO PREVENT WEAK SPOTSALONG CHANNEL MARGINSINSTALL ROCK SILL PER DETAILMICROPOOLSA'Plan ViewNOTES:·CASCADING RIFFLES SHALL BEUSED FOR 5-15% SLOPES OR ASINDICATED ON THE PLANS.·ROCK CASCADE SHALL BE USEDINSTEAD OF CASCADING RIFFLESFOR SLOPES >15%.·ROCK SILL TO BE INSTALLED ONALL CASCADING RIFFLES.FOOTER BOULDERHEADER BOULDERFOOTER BOULDERHEADER BOULDER005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.2
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North CarolinaNOTES:·LOGS WITHOUT ROOT MASS MAY BE USED ONLY IFAPPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.·BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACEOF ANGLED LOGS WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER.Details CR-ALRCR-CSSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3FOR RIFFLE SIZE MATERIAL46.2Bank StabilizationNot to ScaleTOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPEJUNCUS PLUG (TYP)SEE PLANTING PLANLIVE STAKE (TYP)SEE PLANTING PLANEROSION CONTROLMATTING(SEE DETAIL)EXISTING GROUND2:1
MAXNOTES:·GRADE BANKS AS INDICATED ONPLANS OR AS DIRECTED BYENGINEER.
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
Rock CascadeNot to Scale16.3NOTES:·MINIMUM SIZE FOR BOULDERS SHALL BE 2' x 2' x 1'.·VOID SPACES BETWEEN BOULDERS ON CASCADESHALL BE FILLED WITH SMALLER NATIVE ROCK WHEREAVAILABLE.·IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE, QUARRIED ROCKMAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES.·ALL SMALLER ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS ANDWELL MIXED.Profile5:1Section A-A'BACKFILL WITH GRADED MIX OFSMALL BOULDERS, COBBLE, GRAVELAND SANDDOUBLE STACKBOULDER / ROCK MIX.FILL ALL GAPS BETWEENLARGE BOULDERSSLOPE VARIES(33% MAX)NATIVE ROCK EQUIVALENTTO CLASS I RIPRAP, VOIDS FILLEDWITH ONSITE GRAVEL AND SAND(TYP)FILTER FABRICEXISTING SOILTERRACE EXISTINGSLOPEFOOTER BOULDER TO EXTEND18" BELOW POOL INVERTRiffle Sequence Plan ViewTOP OF BANKTOE OF BANKABA'B'CASCADEFLOWCC'Section B-B'5:15:1FOOTER BOULDERHEADER BOULDERDmax
Dmax
OVEREXCAVATE 1-2', BACKFILL WITHWELL-GRADED MIX OF SMALL BOULDERS,COBBLE, GRAVEL AND SAND5:1DpoolVEGETATED STONE TOE PROTECTIONAROUND POOL MARGINS AS SPECIFIED BYDESIGNER, SEE SECTION C-C'POOL INVERT PER TYPICALSECTION OR PROFILESection C-C'VEGETATED STONE TOE PROTECTIONAROUND POOL MARGINS WHERESPECIFIED BY DESIGNER.Rock SillNot to Scale26.3POOLProfile ViewHEADER BOULDERFOOTER BOULDERNONWOVENFILTER FABRICPlan ViewAA'FLOWPOOLWIDEN BOTTOM WIDTHTO TYPICAL STRUCTUREPOOL DIMENSIONMAY BE HORSE SHOE SHAPED, ARCHED(SHOWN), ANGLED OR IRREGULAR.CONTRACTOR TO VARY OR SHAPE ASDIRECTED. IN OUTSIDE OF BEND, ANGLEDWITH SLOPING ARM IS TYPICALLY REQUIRED.BACKFILL EQUAL RIFFLEMIX FROM PROJECTRIFFLE TABLEBACKFILLDEPTH 18"MINIMUMBY 3' LENGTHBASE FLOW2-4"BOTTOM WIDTH (TYPICAL SECTIONS)NONWOVENFILTER FABRICHEADER BOULDERFOOTER BOULDERANCHOR BOULDERS 2' INTOBANK (HEADERS ANDFOOTERS), BOTH SIDES18" (MIN.)MIDDLE OF ROCK STEP 2-4"LOWER THAN BANKS OF ROCK STEPSection A-A'NOTE:·SEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.3 FORBOULDER SIZE.005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.3
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details CR-RCStructure Table36.3NOTE:·ARM LENGTH (X) INDICATES EXPOSED ARMLENGTH AND DOES NOT INCLUDEADDITIONAL TIE-IN LENGTH.·SLOPE (S) FOR CROSS VANES SHOULD VARYFROM 7%-8%.Vane Arm DimensionsVenable CreekReach 2Venable CreekReach 3UT1UT2UT3UT2B, UT4, UT6W (FT)2.02.21.70.90.80.4H (FT)0.40.40.40.20.20.1X (FT)8.59.07.33.63.11.9Θ (Degree)25°25°25°25°25°25°S* (%)5.0%4.7%5.2%4.8%4.9%6.7%Y2.02.21.70.90.80.4ReachRiffle CompositionMin. Riffle DepthVenable Creek Reach 240% Class A, 60% Class B18"Venable Creek Reach 340% Class A, 60% Class B18"UT140% Class A, 60% Class B18"UT270% Class A, 30% Class B8"UT370% Class A, 30% Class B8"UT2B60% Class A, 40% Class B8"UT460% Class A, 40% Class B8"UT660% Class A, 40% Class B8"Boulder DimensionsVenable Creek Reach 2Venable Creek Reach 3UT1UT2UT3UT2B, UT4, UT6Length (ft)3.03.03.02.02.02.0Width (ft)2.52.52.51.51.51.5Height (ft)2.02.02.01.01.01.0
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)INVERTWIDTH(W)LENGTH OFVANE ARM(X)AA'qPlan ViewProfile ViewB-B'STRUCTURE INVERTELEVATION POINTPER PROFILESection A-A'TOE OF SLOPETYPE 2FILTER FABRICEXTEND FILTERFABRIC 5' MIN.UPSTREAMCHANNEL BEDSLOPE (S) 5%-8%HTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)STRUCTURE INVERT ELEVATIONPER PROFILEHEADER ROCKFOOTER ROCKEXTEND FILTERFABRIC 5' MIN.UPSTREAMEXCAVATE POOLPER PROFILEB'B36.4Boulder Cross VaneNot to ScaleHEADER ROCKFOOTER ROCKSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALSALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIAL16.4HEIGHT VARIES18" TO 36"2"UPHILL2"15°BASE FLOWSTREAMBEDCOMPACTED SOIL 12" THICKLIVE CUTTINGSBIODEGRADABLE EROSIONCONTROL FABRIC (SEE INSET "A")INSTALL ADDITIONAL VEGETATION SUCH ASLIVE STAKES, ROOTED SEEDLINGS, AND ETC.OUTER LAYER 26 OZ / YD²COIR MATTINGINNER LAYER 11.2 OZ. / YD²COCONUT FIBER BLANKETROCK TOE PROTECTION(CLASS B - VARIES PERSTREAM SIZE)Vegetated Soil LiftNot to ScaleSection A-A'FL
O
W
COVER LOGPlan ViewAA'1'FOOTER LOGTRANSPLANT/BRUSH TOECOVER LOG46.4Lunker LogNot to ScaleT
O
P

O
F

B
A
N
K

(
T
Y
P
)
T
O
E

O
F
SL
O
P
E

(
T
Y
P
)FOR STEEPER REACHESINSTALL BRUSH TOEUPSTREAM OF THE LUNKER LOGPER DESIGNER'S INSTRUCTIONS.TOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)AA'Profile ViewPlan ViewSection A - A'STREAMBEDEXTEND FILTER FABRIC5' MIN. UPSTREAMEMBED LOG5' (MIN.)EXCAVATEDSCOUR POOLSILL ELEVATIONPER PROFILESALVAGED ONSITECOBBLE/GRAVELBED MATERIALFILTER FABRICSILL ELEVATIONPER PROFILE (TYP)SILL ELEVATIONPER PROFILE (TYP)FOOTER LOGHEADER LOG26.4Log SillNot to ScaleFLOW005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.4
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina Section ViewTypical StakesInset "A"Matting and BlanketNOTES:·ROOTED/LEAFED CONDITION OF THE LIVING PLANTMATERIAL IS NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TIME OFINSTALLATION.·BOTTOM OF FIRST COMPACTED EARTH LIFT TO BEPLACED 6" ABOVE NORMAL BASEFLOW.·NUMBER OF COMPACTED EARTH LIFTS TO VARYDEPENDING ON DESIGN TOP OF BANK HEIGHT.Details
6' MIN
.ANCHOR INTO BANKWITH ROOT WADCOMPACTED SOIL LIFT WITHBIODEGRADABLE EROSIONCONTROL FABRIC(SEE INSET "A", DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.4)FOOTER LOGBURIED 6" BELOWMAX POOL DEPTHUNDISTURBED SOILEXTEND BED MATERIAL3' MIN. UPSTREAM
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020Section ViewECO-STAKE (TYP)EROSION CONTROLMATTING (TYP)Plan ViewECO-STAKE (TYP)TOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETOE OF SLOPE12"2"2"Typical StakeTOP OF BANKSECURE MATTING IN6" DEEP TRENCH3' MAX.SPACING6" MIN. OVERLAP INDOWNSTREAM DIRECTIONAT MAT ENDS6" MIN
1.25".4"Eco-StakeSTAKE (TYP)STAKE (TYP)ECO-STAKE (TYP)16.5Erosion Control MattingNot to Scale8"4"WIRETOP AND BOTTOM STRANDSHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN.MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRESSHALL BE 12 12 GAGE MIN.8' MAX. WITH WIRE(6' MAX. WITHOUT WIRE)FILTER FABRICEXISTING GROUNDFILTER FABRICCOMPACTED FILLSTEEL POST
2'-0" DEPTHEXTEND FABRICINTO TRENCH46.5Temporary Silt FenceNot to ScaleIMPERVIOUS DIKE(SEE INSET "B")INTAKE HOSEPUMPDISCHARGE HOSEIMPERVIOUS DIKE(SEE INSET "B")10' X 5' STABILIZED OUTLETUSING CLASS B RIPRAP ANDNCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC.(SEE INSET "C")INTAKE HOSEDEWATERINGPUMPDISCHARGE HOSEDEWATERING BAG(SEE INSET "A")SAND BAG(24" X 12" X 6")OR STONE.IMPERVIOUS SHEETINGFLOWFLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROMPUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACEWITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.10' MIN.STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS BRIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTINGGROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE ANDLOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THEFIELD BY THE ENGINEER.FILTER FABRICInset "C"Stabilized OutletPlan ViewInset "B"Impervious DikeEXISTING TERRAINDEWATERING BAGSTREAM BEDFILTER FABRIC8" of CLASS B RIPRAP15' to 20'NOTE:1.PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLETTO STREAMBED.10'15'BAG PLACED ONAGGREGATED OR STRAW.HIGH STRENGTHDOUBLE STITCHED"J" TYPE SEAMS.SEWN IN SPOUTHIGH STRENGTH STRAPPINGFOR HOLDING HOSEIN PLACE.FLEXIBLEDISCHARGE HOSEWATER FLOWFROM PUMPInset "A"Dewatering BagACTIVE WORK AREADEWATERINGBAG36.5Pump Around SystemNot to ScaleWATER DIVERSION CHANNELMUD MATSSUPPORT LOG12" Ø MIN.FILTER FABRICCLASS BSTONEYX' DIM26.5Temporary Stream Crossing - TimberNot to ScaleNOTES:·CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT NORMALBASEFLOW.·MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. DONOT EXCAVATE CHANNEL BOTTOM.·INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW.·MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE CONSTRUCTIONROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING CHANNEL.·STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE EDGE OFTHE MUD MAT.·CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMPANGLE ACCORDING TO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.NOTES:·USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND WITH AMINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING.·USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH AND FASTENADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.·PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTENER ANGLE STEELTYPE. ANGLE STEEL TYPE.005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.5
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details[X]
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
4' MIN.Section ViewPlan ViewFront View3'INSTALLATION:REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DURING INSTALLATION OFTHE SILT BARRIER OR SILT FENCE, INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETSARE NEEDED ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THEBARRIER AND FENCE. IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THE LOCATION,EXTENT, OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION, CONTACT THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, ORRESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE. EROSION CONTROL PERSONNELHAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND MAY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLEDOUTLETS AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION.IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME, IT WILL HAVETO BE REBUILT.DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE COMPLETING INSTALLATIONOF THE SILT FENCE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION:INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT (S) IN THE BARRIER OR FENCE WHEREWATER WILL POND.INSTALL THE OUTLET WHERE IT IS ACCESSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, ANDREMOVAL.ALLOW AT LEAST:15 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGS.25 FEET FOR FORK LIFTS BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND MULTIPLE-STORYBUILDINGS.10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES.PLACE THE OUTLET SO THAT WATER FLOWING THROUGH IT WILL NOT CREATE ANEROSION HAZARD BELOW: AVOID STEEP SLOPES BELOW THE OUTLET AND AREASWITHOUT PROTECTIVE VEGETATION. USE SLOPE DRAINS IF NECESSARY.DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET: FOR A SILT BARRIER, WHEN THE TRENCH ISDUG TO BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED ATTHE OUTLET; FOR A SILT FENCE, WHEN THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE FILTERFABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET.REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN.CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET. CLEAR ADEQUATEACCESS FOR THE EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, ANDREMOVAL.FOR A SILT BARRIER:JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACE ALAYER OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND TOPROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BYOUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET; PLACE 6 INCHESOF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH. STAKE THEREMAINING EDGES OF THE FABRIC TO HOLD ITIN PLACE.ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO,PLACE STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR STRENGTH. THEPOSTS MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APARTAND DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 18INCHES.PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDEDGALVANIZED SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4 -1/2-INCH HOLES) ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THEPOSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE IN PLACE.PUT 6 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THE CLOTHIN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THE POSTSWITH LENGTHS OF WIRE.BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTHAND THE UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRICBELOW THE OUTLET IN THE TRENCH ANDCOMPACT THE FILL.PLACE A FILTER OF 1-INCH DIAMETER WASHEDSTONE ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET.PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF THEHARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINTBETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE BARRIER.FOR A SILT FENCE:JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER, PLACEA LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUNDTO PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BYOUTFLOW FROM THE OUTLET; PLACE 6INCHES OF THE UPPER EDGE IN THE TRENCH.STAKE THE OTHER EDGES OF THE FABRIC TOHOLD IT IN PLACE.ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILLGO, PLACE ADDITIONAL STEEL FENCE POSTSFOR STRENGTH. THE POSTS MUST BE AMAXIMUM OF 2 FEET APART AND DRIVENINTO SOLID GROUND AT LEAST 18 INCHES.PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH (WELDEDGALVANIZED SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4 -1/2-INCH HOLES) ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THEPOSTS TO HOLD THE WASHED STONE INPLACE. PUT 6 INCHES OF THE BOTTOM OF THECLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND FASTEN IT TO THEPOSTS WITH LENGTHS OF WIRE.BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARECLOTH, THE UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTERFABRIC BELOW THE OUTLET, AND THE WIREFENCE IN THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THEFILL.PLACE A FILTER OF 1-INCH DIAMETER WASHEDSTONE ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE OUTLET.PILE THE STONE UP TO THE TOP OF THEHARDWARE CLOTH AND OVER THE JOINTBETWEEN THE OUTLET AND THE SILT FENCE.BURY WIRE FENCE, FILTER FABRIC,AND HARDWARE CLOTH IN TRENCHSILT FENCEEND OF FILTER FABRICSTEEL FENCE POSTSET MAX 2' APARTTOP OF SILT FENCEMUST BE AT LEAST 1'ABOVE THE TOP OFTHE WASHED STONEFILTER FABRICON GROUNDBURY WIRE FENCEAND HARDWARE CLOTHSTEEL FENCE POSTWIRE FENCEHARDWARE CLOTHFILTER OF 1" DIA.WASHED STONEFILTER OF 1" DIA.WASHED STONEEND OF FILTER FABRICSILT FENCE26.6Temporary Silt Fence Gravel OutletNot to ScaleTOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)FLOWWORK AREA20'20'INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THREECHECK DAMS LOCATED ATDOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PROJECT.FLOW
TOE OF SLOPE
(TYP)NO. 57 STONECLASS BRIPRAP2' MIN.3'NO. 57 STONE 4 INCHESWIDE ON UPSTREAM FACESPILLWAY CRESTCLASS B RIPRAPPlan ViewTop ViewSection A-A'20'20'CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVESEDIMENT WHEN DEPTHREACHES 12".FLOWWORKAREAProfile View23 STREAMWIDTH3'TOE OF SLOPECLASS B RIPRAPTOP OF BANK6"Section B-B'5' MIN.FLOWTemporary Rock Sediment DamNot to Scale16.66' MAX. WITH WIREORANGE SAFTYFENCE"T" OR "U" POST DRIVENMINIMUM OF 18" INTO GROUNDATTACH SAFETY FENCETO METAL POSTS USINGMETAL WIRE TIES4' MIN.
18" MIN.46.6Safety FenceNot to Scale50'12'PUBLIC ROADCLASS A STONE8" MIN. DEPTH36.6Construction EntranceNot to ScaleNOTES:·PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATELARGE TRUCKS.·LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS OF INGRESSAND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. PROVIDE FREQUENTCHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE.·MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENTTRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS. PERIODICTOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY.·ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BECLEANED IMMEDIATELY.·USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE APPROVEDBY THE ENGINEER.·PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.6
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
DetailsSAF
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020FLOWAA'Plan ViewEROSION CONTROL MATTINGTOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)DENSELY PACKED WOODY DEBRISBRUSH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLEDFLUSH WITH BANKTOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)Section A-A'DENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOILEROSION CONTROL MATTINGBACKFILLTOE OF SLOPE3'NATIVE SOILELEV. 6" BELOWPOOL DEPTHELEV. 6" ABOVEDOWNSTREAMRIFFLE INVERTPlan ViewTOP OF BANK (BANKFULL)Section A-A'BASE LOG4"-6" DIAMETERDENSELY PACKED BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOILEROSION CONTROL MATTINGBACKFILLDENSELY PACK BRUSH, WOODY DEBRIS AND SOILIN BETWEEN BASE LOGSBASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOWTOE OF SLOPE2' MIN3'BRUSH MATERIAL TO BEINSTALLED FLUSHWITH BANKFLOWAA'EROSION CONTROL MATTINGTOP OF BANK (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOE OF SLOPE (TYP)TOP OF BANK (TYP)BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOWBACKFILLNATIVE SOILBASE LOG6-12" DIAMETERELEV. 6" BELOWPOOL DEPTHELEV. 1' ABOVEDOWNSTREAMRIFFLE INVERTWIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS6"WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS3"Brush Toe - Large StreamsNot to Scale - Venable Creek, UT116.7Brush Toe - Small StreamsNot to Scale - UT2, UT3, UT4, UT5, UT626.7005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.7
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details NOTES:·OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).·INSTALL BASE LOGS PARALLEL TO FLOW AT TOE OF SLOPE.DIAMETER 6"-12".·INSTALL BASE LOGS PERPENDICULAR TO FLOW AT INTERVALSALONG BANK, RESTING ON TOP OF PARALLEL BASE LOGS. BASELOGS SHALL BE 6"-12” DIAMETER.·INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICHSHALL CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTEDON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACTBRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.·BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLELAND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.·INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.·INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYERACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.·SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ANDBANK STABILIZATION PER PLANS.NOTES:·OVEREXCAVATE 3' OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK (BANKFULL).·INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS, WHICHSHALL CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTEDON-SITE AND SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACTBRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS LAYER.·BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLELAND IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM.·INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.·INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYERACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.·SEED, MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ANDBANK STABILIZATION PER PLANS.
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
TOP OF BANKLIVE STAKE (TYP)SEE PLAN VIEWFOR SPACINGEROSION CONTROLMATTING(SEE DETAIL)Plan View - UT2, UT3, UT2B, UT4 & UT62' TO 3' LIVE STAKETAPERED AT BOTTOM1/2" TO 2"DIAMETERLive Stake DetailTOE OF SLOPEJUNCUS PLUG (TYP)6' - 8' SPACING FORLIVE STAKES3' - 5' SPACING FORJUNCUS PLUGS3' OUTSIDE TOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPEPlan View -Venable Creek Reach & UT16' - 8' SPACING FORLIVE STAKES3' - 5' SPACING FORJUNCUS PLUGS6 - 8' SPACING FORLIVE STAKESTOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPETOP OF BANKTOE OF SLOPEJUNCUS PLUG (TYP)16.8Live Staking & Juncus PlugsNot to Scale123456INSERT THE DIBBLE, ORSHOVEL, STRAIGHT DOWNINTO THE SOIL TO THEFULL DEPTH OF THE BLADEAND PULL BACK ON THEHANDLE TO OPEN THEPLANTING HOLE. (DO NOTROCK THE SHOVEL BACKAND FORTH AS THISCAUSES SOIL IN THEPLANTING HOLE TO BECOMPACTED, INHIBITINGROOT GROWTH.REMOVE THE DIBBLE, ORSHOVEL, AND PUSH THESEEDLING ROOTS DEEPINTO THE PLANTING HOLE.PULL THE SEEDLING BACKUP TO THE CORRECTPLANTING DEPTH (THEROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE 1TO 3 INCHES BELOW THESOIL SURFACE). GENTLYSHAKE THE SEEDLING TOALLOW THE ROOTS TOSTRAIGHTEN OUT. DO NOTTWIST OR SPIN THESEEDLING OR LEAVE THEROOTS J-ROOTED.INSERT THE DIBBLE, ORSHOVEL, SEVERAL INCHESIN FRONT OF THESEEDLING AND PUSH THEBLADE HALFWAY INTOTHE SOIL. TWIST ANDPUSH THE HANDLEFORWARD TO CLOSE THETOP OF THE SLIT TO HOLDTHE SEEDLING IN PLACE.PUSH THE DIBBLE, ORSHOVEL, DOWN TOTHE FULL DEPTH OFTHE BLADE.PULL BACK ON THEHANDLE TO CLOSE THEBOTTOM OF THEPLANTING HOLD. THENPUSH FORWARD TO CLOSETHE TOP, ELIMINATING AIRPOCKETS AROUND THEROOT.REMOVE THE DIBBLE, ORSHOVEL, AND CLOSE ANDFIRM UP THE OPENINGWITH YOUR HEEL. BECAREFUL TO AVOIDDAMAGING THE SEEDLING.DIBBLE BARPLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE ABLADE WITH A TRIANGULARCROSS-SECTION, AND SHALLBE 12 INCHES LONG, 4INCHES WIDE AND 1 INCHTHICK AT CENTER.ROOTING PRUNINGALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNEDTO AN APPORIATE LENGTHTO PREVENT J-ROOTING.RESTOREDCHANNELBANKFULLBUFFER WIDTHVARIESSPACING PERPLANTING PLANSection View26.8Bare Root PlantingNot to ScaleBMP Stabilized InletNot to Scale36.82'12"Section A-A'6.0'3.0'MIN 0.67'2.0'CLASS A/B RIPRAP2.0'1.0'NO. 57 STONEFLOWBB'A'AA'ASection A-A'Section B-B'BMPBMPPlan ViewPlan ViewBMP Rock Weir OutletNot to Scale46.8005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.8
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details NOTE:·LIVE STAKES AND JUNCUS PLUGS TO BE PLANTED ON ALLRESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT I REACHES, UT3 REACH 1,UT4, AND UT6 REACH 1.·LIVE STAKES AND JUNCUS PLUGS TO BE PLANTED ON BANKGRADING AREAS ALONG VENABLE CREEK REACH 4.NOTES:·ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER PLANTING AREA SHALL BEDISKED, AS REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PLANTING.·ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY HANDLED PRIOR TOINSTALLATION TO INSURE SURVIVAL.LIVE STAKE (TYP)SEE PLAN VIEWFOR SPACINGEROSION CONTROLMATTING(SEE DETAIL)Section View - UT2, UT3, UT2B, UT4 & UT6Section View -Venable Creek & UT16'FLOW
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
CLASS A/B RIP RAPFILTER FABRICCLASS A/B RIP RAPFILTER FABRICPROPOSED GRADE3:1PROPOSED GRADE12"PROPOSED GRADE12"26.9BMP - Pocket Wetland Venable Creek Reach 3Not to ScaleLENGTH VARIES PERPROFILE1.0' MINRIFFLEMATERIAL2:12:12:12:112.0'FLOWCONNECT TOEXISTINGGROUNDCONNECT TOEXISTINGGROUNDHEAD OF POOL (TYP.)SLOPE VARIESPER PROFILEEXCAVATE POOLPER PROFILEB'BHEAD OF RIFFLE (TYP.)HEAD OF POOL (TYP.)A'A8.0'EXISTING SOILBOULDERSFILTER FABRICFLOWNATIVE ROCK EQUIVALENTTO CLASS I RIPRAP OR ON-SITESTONE MEETING CLASS 1GRADATIONMIX OF NATIVEROCKEQUIVALENT TOCLASS 1 RIP-RAP1.0'2.0'16.9Step-Pool Stormwater Conveyance (SPSC)Not to Scale005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.9
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details Section A-A'Riffle Sequence Plan ViewSPSC ProfileSection B-B'Section A-A'Plan ViewStone WeirSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.8Inflow/Outflow ChannelSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.8NOTES:·IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE, QUARRIED ROCK MAY BESUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES.·ALL SMALLER ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS AND WELLMIXED.·SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR EACH RESPECTED SPSC PROFILE1027.33'PROPOSED GRADEEXISITING GRADE3' MIN BENCH10:16:16:13' MIN BENCH10:12' MAX5'AA'2'6'2'6'EL 1028'0.67'EL 1028'36.9BMP - Pocket Wetland Venable Creek Reach 4Not to ScaleCLASS A/B RIP RAPFILTER FABRICCLASS A/B RIP RAPFILTER FABRICPROPOSED GRADE3:112"PROPOSED GRADE12"Section A-A'Plan View1001.33'PROPOSED GRADEEXISITING GRADE3' MIN BENCH10:16:16:13' MIN BENCH10:12' MAX5'2'6'2'6'EL 1002'0.67'EL 1002'AA'DEPTHVARIES PERPROFILEStone WeirSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.8Inflow/Outflow ChannelSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.8CECECECECECECECECECESAF SAF SAFSAFSAF105+00 106+00 107+001030LODLOD LOD LODOUTLET CHANNELSTONE WEIREL 1027.33'HERBACEOUS PLUGS TOBE PLANTED ALONGSHALLOW 3' BENCH.SEE HERBACEOUS ZONEPLANTINGS ON SHEET 3.1VENABLE CREEK REACH 3
10051010101510151010100510
0
1
C
E
C
E
C
E
C
E
CE CE CE CE
C
E
C
E
CECECEC
E
C
E
CEC
E
C
E128+001
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
TOB
T O B TO B
TOBT O B TOBTO B
INSTALL CHECK DAMS (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.6LODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD OUTLET CHANNELSTONE WEIREL 1001.33'HERBACEOUS PLUGSTO BE PLANTED ALONGSHALLOW 3' BENCH.SEE HERBACEOUS ZONEPLANTINGS ON SHEET3.1.V
E
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K

R
E
A
C
H

4 INFLOW CHANNEL
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
16.10Permanent Ford CrossingNot to Scale005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.10
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details26.10Culvert Crossing - UT2Not to ScaleF
12"FILTER FABRIC9" CLASS B STONE BASECAPPED WITH 3" #57 STONENOTE:1.FORD CROSSING SHALL BEINSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TOCHANNEL BANKS.Plan ViewTOP OF BANK
16' MINMAINTAIN LOW FLOW THALWEGTHROUGH CROSSING5:1
MAX5:1 MAX20' MIN20' MINTOP OF BANK5:1 MAX20' MIN20' MIN16'2:12:13" COARSE AGGREGATE20' EASEMENT BREAKCECECECECECECECECECEXX CATTLE EXCLUSION FENCE49" X 33" ARCHED CMP30 LFCLASS I STONEMINIMUMINITIAL BACKFILL, PLACED INLIFTS OF 6"-8" ONSITE SELECTMATERIAL20' MAXCULVERT INV EL: 1026.85'CULVERT INV EL: 1026.63'PROPOSEDPROFILEINSTALL SILLPER PROFILETWG EL: 1027.35'(6" ABOVECULVERT INVERT)Profle ViewPlan ViewSection ViewEMBED CULVERT 6".BACKFILL WITH 5050 MIXCLASS A/B RIP RAP6" MIN. BEDDING,#57 STONEROAD ELEVATION: 1031.0'2.0'8.00'11'12" DEPTH5050 MIX CLASS AAND B RIP RAPTOPPED WITHABC STONE49" X 33" ARCHED CMPINV EL: 1026.85' U/SINV EL: 1026.63' D/S2.0'#57 STONE16'EL: 1030.5'TYPE 2 WOVENFILTER FABRICTOP 3" ABC STONEEXISTING GRADEINITIAL BACKFILL PLACEDIN LIFTS 6"-8" ONSITESELECT MATERIALUNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL34'1021.000CECECECECECECECECECE
CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IX
CE-IX
CE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXSAFSAFSAFSAFSAF
SAF
SAF309+00310+001
0
2
5
10301030102510301035104010451050LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD LODLODLODLODLOD1 - 30 LF49" X 33" ARCHED CMPINLETSTA: 380+66IN ELE 1026.85'OUTLETSTA: 380+96IN EL: 1026.63'GRADE ROADWAY 4:1 MAXOVERFLOW CHANNELSEE CROSS SECTION VIEW FOR DETAILS16' ROAD WIDTHROAD EL: 1031.0'2(H):1(V) SIDE SLOPECOVERED IN CLASS BSTONEFILL FARM ROADUT2
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.11
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X
XX
X
X
XX
X
X
X
XX
X
X
XXX
X
X
X XX XX
X XX XX
X XX
X XX
X X X XX X X X XX XX X XX XXX X7"7"6"6"4-5"6"5"2-3"30"6"MIN - 12"MAX12' MAX3.5" TYP DIA WOODEN POSTPRESSURE TREATED PINEOR BLACK LOCUST1 STRAND OF CLASS 1 BARBED WIRE 12.5 GAUGEOR CLASS 3 BARBED WIRE 15.5 GAUGENOTES:1.THE FENCE SHALL MEET CLASSIFICATION FOR 949-12 FIXEDKNOT HIGH TENSILE WOVEN WIRE.2.WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LIVESTOCK SIDE OF THEFENCE.3.MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN LINE POSTS SHALL BE 12 FEETON CENTER AND SET AT LEAST 30 INCHES INTO THE GROUND.4.ALL CORNERS, FENCE LINE ENDS, AND GATE OPENINGSALONG WOVEN WIRE FENCING REQUIRE H BRACEASSEMBLIES. CORNER OR PULL POST ASSEMBLY SHALL BEINSTALLED IN STRAIGHT FENCE SECTIONS NOT TO EXCEED324' ON LEVEL LAND OR AT OTHER POINTS OF CHANGES INSLOPES AND CURVES.5.REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ONFENCING.949-12 FIXED KNOTHIGH TENSILE WOVEN WIRE12.5 GAUGE WITH ZINC COATING16.11Woven Wire FenceNot to ScaleXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
5" - 6" DIAMETER VERTICAL BRACE POSTSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX42"8'12" X 3/8" DOWEL6" X 3/8"DOWELSingle Span "H" Brace Assembly(MAXIMUM SPACING 324')Corner BracesUSE WHEN CORNER ANGLEIS 160° OR LESS4" - 5" DIAMETER BRACE POSTSTWITCH STICKPRESSURE TREATED PINEOR BLACK LOCUSTTWO WRAPS OF 12.5GAUGE HIGH TENSILE WIREOR 1 WRAP OF 9 GAUGEHIGH TENSILE WIRE8' - 0" MIN8'
-

0
"
M
INCORNER POST 5" MIN ON TOPAND 8" MIN ON BOTTOM42" MIN8' - 0" MIN8' MINVERTICALBRACE POSTLine Post AssemblyDouble 2" Tube Steel GatesNot to ScaleDetail of GatePost AnchorAccess GateHinge AssemblyGROUND LINESEE TABLE3' MIN18" MIN5"GATE POST ANCHOR58"CURVED TO FITDIAMETER OF FRAMECURVED TO FITDIAMETER OFBOLT HINGHinge Clamp(2 Required)Bolt Hinge(2 Required)NOTES:1.ALL POSTS AND BRACES MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR SQUARE ATTHE OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR, PROVIDED THE SAME TYPEIS USED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.2.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF ROUND OR EDGEDIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS AND BRACES.3.ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END, CORNER OR GATE POSTS.PLACE LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 300' AND ATTHE END OF THE WIRE ROLL.4.THE 300' INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE ENGINEER ONCURVES WHERE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE IS GREATER THAN3 DEGREES.5.NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1" MINIMUM FOR HORIZONTAL BRACES.PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d NAILSAT EACH END OF ALL BRACES.6.PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST. DRAW ALL BRACEWIRE TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH POST.7.INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPTTHAT ON HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER THAN THREE DEGREES(3°) INSTALL THE FENCE TO PULL AGAINST ALL POSTS. SEENCDOT STD. 866.02 FOR FENCING AT DITCH CROSSINGS, BREAKSIN GRADES AND R/W BREAKS.8.USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. HINGEASSEMBLY AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED. SUBSTITUTION MAY BESUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. USED 2" PAINTEDSTEEL PIPE FOR GATE FRAME EXCEPT AS SHOWN HERE.9.ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE MEETING THEAPPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOTLIMITED TO THE EXAMPLES SHOWN HEREON.USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE AT GATE POSTS ORWHERE REQUIRED BY SOIL CONDITIONS. CONCRETEMAY ALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTING POSTS TOTHEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH.26.11GATE POST:GATE POST2" PAINTEDTUBE STEEL GATESEE TABLEGATE POSTDOUBLE GATE POST SPACINGGATESPOST SPACING2 - 8'16'2 - 12'24'Detail of GatePost AnchorAccess GateHinge AssemblyGATE POSTGATE POST2" PAINTEDTUBE STEEL GATEGROUND LINEvaries3' MIN18" MIN5"GATE POSTANCHOR58"CURVED TO FITDIAMETER OF FRAMECURVED TO FITDIAMETER OFBOLT HINGHinge Clamp(2 Required)Bolt Hinge(2 Required)NOTES:1.ALL POSTS AND BRACES MAY BE EITHER ROUND OR SQUARE ATTHE OPTION OF THE CONTRACTOR, PROVIDED THE SAME TYPEIS USED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.2.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE THE DIAMETER OF ROUND OR EDGEDIMENSIONS OF SQUARE POSTS AND BRACES.3.ERECT LINE BRACES BETWEEN END, CORNER OR GATE POSTS.PLACE LINE BRACES AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 300' AN ATTHE END OF THE BARBED WIRE ROLL.4.THE 300' INTERVAL MAY BE REDUCED BY THE ENGINEER ONCURVES WHERE THE DEGREE OF CURVATURE IS GREATER THAN3 DEGREES.5.NOTCH BRACE POSTS 1" MINIMUM FOR HORIZONTAL BRACES.PLACE TWO GALVANIZED 12d OR THREE GALVANIZED 10d NAILSAT EACH END OF ALL BRACES.6.PLACE THE BRACE WIRE AROUND THE POST. DRAW ALL BRACEWIRE TAUT BY TWISTING BETWEEN EACH POST.7.INSTALL THE FENCE FACING THE PROPERTY OWNER EXCEPTTHAT ON HORIZONTAL CURVES GREATER THAN THREE DEGREES(3°) INSTALL THE FENCE TO PULL AGAINST ALL POSTS. SEENCDOT STD. 866.02 FOR FENCING AT DITCH CROSSINGS, BREAKSIN GRADES AND R/W BREAKS.8.USE LATCH DEVICE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. HINGEASSEMBLY AS SHOWN IS SUGGESTED. SUBSTITUTION MAY BESUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER. USED 2" PAINTEDSTEEL PIPE FOR GATE FRAME EXCEPT AS SHOWN HERE.9.ANY COMBINATION OF GATE AND FENCE TYPE MEETING THEAPPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE AND IS NOTLIMITED TO THE EXAMPLES SHOWN HEREON.USE CLASS "B" CONCRETE AT GATEPOSTS OR WHERE REQUIRED BYSOIL CONDITIONS. CONCRETE MAYALSO BE USED IN LIEU OF SETTINGPOSTS TO THEIR MAXIMUM DEPTH.2" Tube Steel GateNot to Scale36.11316" DIAMETER STEEL CABLE2.0' FROM TOP OF BANK MIN.6"WOVEN WIRE FENCE(SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.11)2.5" STEEL PIPE38" STEEL CHAIN4" MAX4" MAX4" MAXSEE INSET BELOW6"SPOT WELD 38" STEEL CHAINTO 2.5: STEEL PIPESTAINLESS STEEL U-BOLTBANKFULL WIDTH + 4'46.11Suspended Cable FenceNot to ScaleNOTES:1.TO BE INSTALLED AT FORDCROSSINGS AND VENABLE CREEKCULVERT AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETIONBASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.12
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details 16.12Farm Road - UT2/Venable CreekNot to ScaleUPHILL EDGE OFPROPOSED ROAD9" 5050 MIX OF CLASS A ANDGRAVELIN SOFT SOILS ORWETLAND AREAS,USE FILTER FABRIC3" ABC STONEEXISTING GRADE3%26.12Farm Road - Restored Haul Road (UT6)Not to Scale10'3" ABC STONEEXISTING GRADE16'3" 5050 MIX OF CLASS A ANDGRAVEL6"SOIL EXCAVATED INTRENCHLINE SHALL BEPLACED ON UPHILLSIDE OF ROLL1"x1"x24" WOOD STAKE, 6' O.C.8-10" DIA. FIBER ROLLOF STRAW & BURLAP TWINE MESHPLACE SOIL EXCAVATED DURINGTRENCHING ON UPHILL SIDE OF ROLLDRIVE STAKESIN ON ALTERNATINGSIDES OF ROLLOVERLAP ROLL EDGES 12"AND SECURE TO PROVIDEA TIGHT JOINT3'-0"MAX.3'-0"MAX.,TYP.2" MIN4" MAX
FLOWFLOWSection ViewNOTES:1.STRAW WATTLES SHOULD BE PLACED AT THE EDGE OFGRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.2.INSTALL STRAW WATTLES ALONG CONTOUR. RUNOFFMUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER OR AROUNDROLL.36.12Straw WattleNot to ScaleIntentionally left blank.
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.13
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Details 16.135-Wire High Tensile FenceNot to Scale7"8"10"10"9"24" MIN. FOR LINE POSTS48" MIN. FOR BRACE POSTS30' MAX SPACING3.5" DIA. LINE POSTHORIZONTAL BRACE2.5" DIA. GALVANIZED PIPE OR4" DIA. TREATED WOODNOTES:1.THE FENCE SHALL BE BUILT ACCORDING TO THE NRCS SPECIFICATION 382 FOR 5-STRAND ELECTRIC WIRE HIGH TENSILE FENCE. (APRIL 2008)2.WIRE SHALL BE 12.5 GAUGE, CLASS 3 GALVANIZED ZINC (ASTM-116 STANDARD) WITH 170,000 PSI TENSILE STRENGTH. WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LIVESTOCKSIDE OF THE FENCE.3.LINE POSTS SHALL BE 3.5" DIA. PRESSURE TREATED WOOD WITH A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 30 FEET AND A MINIMUM POST HEIGHT OF 68".4.BRACE POSTS SHALL BE 4" DIA. DIAMETER AND SET 48" INTO THE GROUND. HORIZONTAL BRACE POSTS SHALL BE 2.5" DIA. GALVANIZED PIPE OR 4" DIA. PRESSURETREATED WOOD.5.ATTACH WIRE TO POSTS USING THE INDUSTRY STANDARD CONNECTORS AND/OR HIGH QUALITY COMMERCIAL INSULATOR TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE ELECTRIFICATION.6.BRACING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO THE TABLE BELOW:7.REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON FENCING.5-STRAND, 12.5 GAUGE, ELECTRIC WIREWITH TENSILE RATING OF 170K PSIAND WIRE TENSION OF 200 LBSAPPROXIMATEHEIGHT= 44"+GROUND WIREAPPROXIMATEWIRE SPACING (TYP.)++GROUND WIREPULL DISTANCEEND/CORNER/GATE BRACE SPECIFICATIONINLINE BRACE SPECIFICATION< 660 FEETSINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLYNOT REQUIRED660 - 2,000 FEETSINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLYSINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLY> 2,000 FEETDOUBLE H OR DOUBLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLYSINGLE H OR SINGLE DIAGONAL ASSEMBLYCorner BraceLine BracesFIBERGLASS OROTHER APPROVEDINSULATED POST12.5 GUAGE MINSINGLE STRANDGALVANIZEDSTEEL WIRE ORAPPROVEDALTERNATE.SPACED TO MAINTAINWIRE HEIGHT30-34"SPACED TOMAINTAIN WIREHEIGHTFIBERGLASS OROTHER APPROVEDINSULATED POST12.5 GUAGE MINSINGLE STRANDGALVANIZEDSTEEL WIRE ORAPPROVEDALTERNATE.INSULATOR (TYP.)
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.14
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
DetailsNCG01 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLINGEFFECTIVE: 04/01/19GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITHTHE NCG01 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMITImplementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the constructionactivity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handlingsections of the NCG01 Construction General Permit (Sections E and F, respectively). Thepermittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by thedelegated authority having jurisdiction. All details and specifications shown on this sheetmay not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority having jurisdiction.GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATIONStabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of thetechniques in the table below:POLYACRYLAMIDES (PAMS) AND FLOCCULANTS1.Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed duringconstruction, selecting from the NC DWR List of Approved PAMS/Flocculants.2.Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures.3.Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List of ApprovedPAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.4.Provide ponding area for containment of treated Stormwater before dischargingoffsite.5.Store flocculants in leak-proof containers that are kept under storm-resistant coveror surrounded by secondary containment structures.HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE1.Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on-site.2.Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.3.Do not store hazardous chemicals, drums or bagged materials directly on the ground.EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE1.Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids.2.Provide drip pans under any stored equipment.3.Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible, or remove leaking equipment from theproject.4.Collect all spent fluids, store in separate containers and properly dispose ashazardous waste (recycle when possible).5.Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problemhas been corrected.6.Bring used fuels, lubricants, coolants, hydraulic fluids and other petroleum productsto a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials.LITTER, BUILDING MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE1.Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers.2.Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers (e.g dumpster, trashreceptacle) on site to contain construction and domestic wastes.3.Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surfacewaters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.4.Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runofffrom upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain, stream or wetland.5.Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events orprovide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers.6.Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds.7.Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately ifcontainers overflow.8.Dispose waste off-site at an approved disposal facility.9.On business days, clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers.PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE1.Do not dump paint and other liquid waste into storm drains, streams or wetlands.2.Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surfacewaters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available.3.Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area.4.Containment must be labeled, sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site.5.Prevent the discharge of soaps, solvents, detergents and other liquid wastes fromconstruction sites.PORTABLE TOILETS1.Install portable toilets on level ground, at least 50 feet away from storm drains,streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 footoffset is not attainable, provide relocation of portable toilet behind silt fence or placeon a gravel pad and surround with sand bags.2.Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in highfoot traffic areas.3.Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replacewith properly operating unit.HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES1.Store and apply herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with labelrestrictions.2.Store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with thelabel, which lists directions for use, ingredients and first aid steps in case ofaccidental poisoning.3.Do not store herbicides, pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding ispossible or where they may spill or leak into wells, stormwater drains, ground wateror surface water. If a spill occurs, clean area immediately.4.Do not stockpile these materials onsite.CONCRETE WASHOUTS1.Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site.2.Dispose of, or recycle settled, hardened concrete residue in accordance with localand state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.3.Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and inaddition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and withinlot perimeter silt fence.4.Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements, where applicable. If analternate method or product is to be used, contact your approval authority forreview and approval. If local standard details are not available, use one of the twotypes of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.5.Do not use concrete washouts for dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalksections. Stormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into ordischarged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste mustbe pumped out and removed from project.6.Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless itcan be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum,install protection of storm drain inlet(s) closest to the washout which could receivespills or overflow.7.Locate washouts in an easily accessible area, on level ground and install a stoneentrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by theapproving authority.8.Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the projectlimits. Post signage on the washout itself to identify this location.9.Remove leavings from the washout when at approximately 75% capacity to limitoverflow events. Replace the tarp, sand bags or other temporary structuralcomponents when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietaryproducts, follow manufacturer's instructions.10.At the completion of the concrete work, remove remaining leavings and dispose ofin an approved disposal facility. Fill pit, if applicable, and stabilize any disturbancecaused by removal of washout.EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT1.Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen-material stockpile areas at least50 feet away from storm drain inlets, sediment basins, perimeter sediment controlsand surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonablyavailable.2.Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset offive feet from the toe of stockpile.3.Provide stable stone access point when feasible.4.Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordancewith the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is definedas vegetative, physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain acceleratederosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs.SECTION E: GROUND STABILIZATIONRequired Ground Stabilization TimeframesNote: After the permanent cessation of construction activities, any areas with temporaryground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon aspracticable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbingactivity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render thesurface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved.Site Area DescriptionTimeframe variations-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,ditches, perimeter slopes and HQW Zones-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unlessthere is zero slopeStabilize within thismany calendardays after ceasingland disturbance77714NoneNone(a)Perimeter dikes,swales, ditches, andperimeter slopes(b)High Quality Water(HQW) Zones(c)Slopes steeper than3:1If slopes are 10' or less in length and arenot steeper than 2:1, 14 days areallowed(d)Slopes 3:1 to 4:1(e)Areas with slopesflatter than 4:114-7 days for slopes greater than 50' inlength and with slopes steeper than 4:1-7 days for perimeter dikes, swales,ditches, perimeter slopes and HQWZones-10 days for Falls Lake WatershedGround Stabilization and Materials HandlingNot to Scale16.14
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Details.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
6.15
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
DetailsNCG01 SELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTINGEFFECTIVE: 04/01/19PART IIISELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTINGSECTION A: SELF-INSPECTIONSelf-inspections are required during normal business hours in accordance with the tablebelow. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspectionpersonnel to be in jeopardy, the inspection may be delayed until the next business day onwhich it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition, when a storm event of equal to orgreater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours, the self-inspection shall beperformed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspectionswere delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record.NOTE: The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar day inspection requirement.PART IIISELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTINGSECTION B: RECORDKEEPING1.E&SC Plan DocumentationThe approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept on the site. Theapproved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit. Thefollowing items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be documented in the manner described:2. Additional Documentation In addition to the E&SC Plan documents above, the following items shall be kept on the site and available for agency inspectors at all times during normal business hours, unless the Division provides a site-specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make this requirement not practical:(a)This general permit as well as the certificate of coverage, after it is received.(b)Records of inspections made during the previous 30 days. The permittee shall record therequired observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the Division or a similarinspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of electronically-availablerecords in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if shown to provide equal accessand utility as the hard-copy records.(c)All data used to complete the Notice of Intent and older inspection records shall bemaintained for a period of three years after project completion and made available uponrequest. [40 CFR 122.41]PART IIISELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTINGSECTION C: REPORTING1.Occurrences that must be reportedPermittees shall report the following occurrences:(a)Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.(b)Oil spills if:·They are 25 gallons or more,·They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours,·They cause sheen on surface waters (regardless of volume), or·They are within 100 feet of surface waters (regardless of volume).(a)Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311 ofthe Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3) or Section 102 of CERCLA (Ref: 40CFR 302.4) or G.S. 143-215.85.(b)Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.(c)Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or theenvironment.2.Reporting Timeframes and Other RequirementsAfter a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported, he shall contact theappropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the otherrequirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported tothe Division's Emergency Response personnel at [phone], [phone] or [phone].Self-inspection, Recordkeeping and ReportingNot to Scale16.15
N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEFO OUOUOUOUOU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUXXXXX
X
XXXXXXXX OUOUOUOUXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXX
XXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUETFOXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX X XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CECECECECECE
CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECE CECE CECECECE CE CE CECECECECEC
E
CECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE CECEC
E
CECECECECECECECE
CECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECEFCE-IXCE-IXFSHEET 7
.4SHEET 7
.5SHEET 7.2SHEET 7
.3SHEET 7
.6UT1VENABLE CREEKUT2UT3UT4UT5UT6SILOAM ROADLITTLE MOUNTAINCHURCH ROADVENABLE FARM ROADVENABLE CREEKUT2UT2AN/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.1
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Overview
Fencing PlanN0'200'400'600'(HORIZONTAL)High Tensile FenceSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.12Woven Wire FenceSee Detail 1, Sheet 6.1112' Tube Steel GatesSee Detail 4, Sheet 6.118' Tube Steel GatesSee Detail 3, Sheet 6.11
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUE
OUEFO
OUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOUOU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
OU
X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTFOCE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IX CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IX
CE-IXFUT1 SILOAM
ROADLITTLE MOUNTAIN CHURCH ROADVENABLE CREEKX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.2
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831 N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 7.4MATCHLINE SHEET 7.38 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OFCONSERVATION EASEMENT, SAVE METALT-POSTS FOR LANDOWNER (TYP)CONNECT TO EXISTING FENCE2 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.112 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.11WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SINGLESTRAND BARBED WIRE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.11UT1 & Venable Creek
Fencing PlanSUSPENDED CABLE FENCESEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 6.11TIE TO EXISTING FENCETIE TO EXISTING FENCE6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301HIGH TENSILE FENCE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 6.126' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.11
X XX
X
X
OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OUXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXXX XOUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUE OUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXXXCE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE
CECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECEUT3
VENABLE CREEKSILOAM ROADVENABLE FARM ROADX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.3
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831 N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 7.4MATCHLINE SHEET 7.2MATCHLINE SHEET 7.56' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11UT3
Fencing Plan2 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.11N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN V. BROWND.B. 525, PG. 330P.I.N. 5927-49-7075N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301HIGH TENSILE FENCE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET 6.13
XXX X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X XXX X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X XXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CECE-IXCE-IX CE-IXUT2VENABLE CREEKUT2UT2AX:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.4
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831NMATCHLINE SHEET 7.3
MATCHLINE SHEET 7.5MATCHLINE SHEET 7.20'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OFCONSERVATION EASEMENT, SAVE METALT-POSTS FOR LANDOWNER (TYP)2 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.118' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.112 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.11WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SINGLESTRAND BARBED WIRE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.11UT2, UT2A, and Venable Creek
Fencing Plan6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11TIE TO EXISTING FENCEN/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301HIGH TENSILE FENCE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.13
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXCECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE CECE
CECE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CEUT4
UT5V
E
N
A
B
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
VENAB
L
E

C
R
E
E
K
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.5
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831NMATCHLINE SHEET 7.6MATCHLINE SHEET 7.30'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 7.42 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11HIGH TENSILE FENCE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.13UT4, UT5, and Venable Creek
Fencing Plan6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OFCONSERVATION EASEMENT, SAVE METALT-POSTS FOR LANDOWNER (TYP)N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN VENABLE BROWNED.B. 327, PG. 641PIN: 5928-50-7069N/FCHARLES E. BROWNE &LU ANN VENABLE BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 2)P.I.N. 5927-00-59-9301WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SINGLESTRAND BARBED WIRE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.11
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUEOUECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECECE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE
CE
CE
CE CE CE CE CE CE CECECECECECECECECECECE CECECECE CE CECECECECECECECECECECECEC
E
C
E
C
E
CECECECECECECEF CE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXCE-IXUT6VENABLE CREEK
X:\shared\Projects\005-02178 Honey Mill\Cadd\Plans\02178 - Fencing.dwg October 14, 2020
005-02178
JK/CG
EGR
ASE
7.6
09.23.2020 Honey Mill Mitigation Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Sheet
Checked By:
Job Number:
Drawn By:
Project Engineer:
Date:Revisions:
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Tel: [phone]
License No. F-0831 N0'50'100'150'(HORIZONTAL)MATCHLINE SHEET 7.52 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.112 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.114 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESSEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 6.112 - 6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.116' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11REMOVE EXISTING FENCE INSIDE OFCONSERVATION EASEMENT, SAVE METALT-POSTS FOR LANDOWNER (TYP)WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH SINGLESTRAND BARBED WIRE (TYP)SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 6.11UT6 and Venable Creek
Fencing Plan 6' TUBE STEEL GATESEE DETAIL 3, SHEET 6.11SUSPENDED CABLE FENCEAT ENGINEER'S DISCRETIONSEE DETAIL 4, SHEET 6.11TIE TO EXISTING FENCETIE TO EXISTING FENCEN/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 205, PG. 495PIN: 5928-60-5518N/FMONTY K. VENABLE ET AL.D.B. 313, PG. 722PIN: 5927-68-4669N/FLU ANN V. BROWND.B. 1209, PG. 520 (TRACT 1)PIN: 5928-70-6435