20160980 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20201022

ID#* 20160980 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/23/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/22/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
..........................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160980
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Meadow Spring Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Meadow Spring Bank Parcel MY2 Report.pdf 5.76MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 2 Monitoring Report

Meadow Spring Mitigation Site

DWR Project # 2016-0980v2

Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201

Prepared By:

Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909

Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC

October 2020
i
Table of Contents

1 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description .............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria ............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Project Components .................................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach .................................................................... 3
1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions ...................................................................................... 4
1.6 Year 2 Monitoring Performance ................................................................................................ 4
2 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 4
3 Reference ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Appendix A: Site Maps Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 2: Plant Species Summary Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
Meadow Spring 1 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020
1 Project Summary

1.1 Project Location and Description

EBX–Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Monitoring Report for the Meadow Spring Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel).
This Parcel was designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC – 03020201). In addition, it provides nutrient offset credits in the 03020201 HUC,
excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development requiring such mitigation. This
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 02B .0240 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by
EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix
A. The BPDP was also designed in concurrence with Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu-
Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01989). The mitigation plan for the
Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank was approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT)
and constructed in May 2019.

The Meadow Spring Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield,
North Carolina (Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC
03020201100050, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Site
head East on NC 70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south
for approximately 1.5 miles. The coordinates of the site are 35.5437°N and - 78.3303°W.

When combining the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Meadow Spring
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals approximately 60.93
acres and includes three unnamed tributaries to the Neuse River. The Parcel is located in an area formerly
dominated by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the Parcel was grazed
pasture and disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and removal
of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening of onsite streams that resulted in
degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics. The Parcel also contained an agricultural pond
that was in place for over 40 years.

The Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site was built to provide stream enhancement and restoration on
approximately 7,392 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration and enhancement on approximately
36.51 acres of wetlands, to generate 14.41 wetland mitigation units, within the conservation easement
through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT. The Meadow Spring Bank Parcel was built
to restore and enhance stream systems with their adjacent riparian buffers and their functions and values to
compensate, in appropriate circumstances, for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient load
reduction requirements. DWR staff performed an onsite viability assessment for buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset on October 18, 2016 and approved the BPDP in May 2018.

1.2 Project Success Criteria

Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least five months from initial planting. Six vegetation
monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of the riparian
restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset
Meadow Spring 2 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020
mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be recorded for all
trees in the plots: species, common name, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems
in plots will be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring
year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that
enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel
will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50
percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of
Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards upon DWR approval.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the
desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement will also be performed
each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.

RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Meadow
Spring Stream Mitigation Plan.

1.3 Project Components

This Bank generates approximately 4.42 acres (192,368 ft2) of riparian buffer restoration credits on existing
non-forested pasture, 1.79 acres (26,805 ft2) of buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion, and 1.88
acres (4,271 lbs) of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The slight increase in credits is due to a more accurate
treeline survey being used to determine as-built areas. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated
service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The
Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated service nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are
authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake
Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer Restoration credits,
one ledger accounts for buffer Enhancement credits, and one accounts for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits.
All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential mitigation credits that
the Meadow Spring Bank generates are summarized in the table below.

Meadow Spring 3 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020
Table 1. Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credit

The Sponsor may use the 4.42 acres (192,368 ft2) of riparian restoration generated on the non-forested
pasture for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. The Sponsor
must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and
transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request submitted
to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that have occurred
up to the date of the request.

1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach

The land uses adjacent to the streams purposed for buffer restoration and enhancement were primarily
composed of forested and non-forested pasture which were grazed by livestock, but also included, row-
crops, maintained lawns, and hardwood forests.

Restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the channel within the natural
valley, backfilling the existing stream, reconnecting the channel to its floodplain, removing the existing
dam embankment (the pond) and restoring hydrology to historically drained wetlands. Diffuse flow is
maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.

Enhancement also occurs in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). RES installed cattle exclusion fencing in all riparian
areas where enhancement credit under this part of the rule is being requested to exclude access to riparian
areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications.

All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an eight by eight foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. Bank
planting and stabilization also incorporates the use of a riparian seed mix and temporary ground cover to
prevent erosion after construction. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within
Riparian
Zone
Credit
Type Mitigation Type Existing
Acreage
Credit Per
Acre (ft 2)Ratio % Full
Credit Mitigation Assets
Riparian
Buffer Restoration 1.87 43,560 1:1 100%81,474 ft² (1.87 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via Cattle
Exclusion 0.69 43,560 2:1 100%15,002 ft² (0.34 ac)
Riparian
Buffer Restoration 2.55 43,560 1:1 100%110,894 ft² (2.55 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via Cattle
Exclusion 0.27 43,560 2:1 100%5,775 ft² (0.13 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via Cattle
Exclusion 0.84 43,560 2:1 33%6,029 ft² (0.14 ac)
4.42
Zone Credit
Type Mitigation Type Acreage Credit Per
Acre (lbs)Ratio
101-200'Nitrogen Restoration 1.88 2,273.02 N/A
1.88
Riparian Buffer Credit
51-100'
0-50'
101-200'
Total Enhancements 1.79 26,805 ft² (0.62 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
Total Restoration 192,368 ft² (4.42 ac)
Nutrient Offset Credit
Mitigation Assets (lbs)
4,271lbs (1.88 ac)
4,271lbs (1.88 ac)TOTAL
Meadow Spring 4 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020
the sensitive Neuse River watershed, such as nutrient and sediment removal, filtration of runoff, and
improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance
due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua).

1.5 Construction and As-Built Conditions

Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May and June 2019. Deviations from the
initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table
2.
Stream construction activities were completed in June 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-01989), 401 (DWR
# 16-0980), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC#18-097-P; Figure 4) Permits. There were
no easement changes between the submittal of the BPDP Approval and the construction of the site. The
conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs
attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in areas where livestock were present, and t-posts
are used as physical barriers where livestock are not present.

1.6 Year 2 Monitoring Performance

The Meadow Spring Year 2 monitoring activities were completed in September 2020. All Year 2
Monitoring (MY2) data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meet interim success
criteria. RES performed a supplemental planting in April 2020 that included the MY1 low stem density
area in and around Vegetation Plot 9.

Monitoring of the six permanent vegetation plots was completed during September 2020. Vegetation tables
are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY2 monitoring data indicates that all six
plots located in buffer/nutrient crediting areas are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted
stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 526 to 1,093 planted stems per acre with a mean of 769
planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 15 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer
species were observed in three out of six plots. The average tree height observed was 3.0 feet.

Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project including the MY1 low stem density area. All of the
fencing was in good condition and there was no evidence of cattle in the easement. There was no
encroachment observed or similar activities that would negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the conservation easement area. A few small areas of re-
sprouted Chinese privet were observed in the lower section of the easement. Treatments took place in 2020
and will continue to take place as needed throughout the monitoring period.

2 Methods

Vegetation success is being monitored at six permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry
tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal
conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Meadow Spring 5 Year 2 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2020
3 Reference

EBX – Neuse I, LLC (2018). Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site – Bank Parcel Development Plan.

Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

NCDENR. 2009. “Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.” Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).

NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.

Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Appendix A
Site Maps
0 2,0001,000
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Meadow Spring B uffer/Nutrient Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
Legend
Conservation Easement
©Date: 10/25/2019
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: BPB
Document Path: S:\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\Monitoring\MY0\DWR Figures\Figure 1 Meadow Location Map.mxd1 inch = 2,000 feet
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
8 10
11
12
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
LEGEND
Date: 10/19/2020 Drawn by: RTM
Document Path: R:\resgis\dropboxgis\projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\Monitoring\MY2\DWR Figures\Figure 2 DWR MY2 CCPV Meadow.mxd0 200100
Feet
Current Conditions Plan View
Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Site
MY2 2020
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 in = 200 feet
Con serva tion Ea semen tVegetation Plot>32 0 stems/acre404 Ve getatio n Plo tBuffer CreditingRestoration (0 -50 ')Restora tion (5 1-1 00')Enha nce ment (0-5 0')Enha nce ment (51 -100 ')Enha nce ment (10 1-20 0')Nutrie nt O ffset (101 -20 0')We tlan d Mitig ationStream A lig nmen t
©
S6B
S5
S6BS6A
S2
S1
Vegeta tion Conditio n As ses smen t
AbsentPresentMarginal
Absent
Present
Target Community
Invasive SpeciesNo Fill
Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 2. Planted Species Summary

Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Common Name Scientific Name Total Stems Planted
Water Oak Quercus nigra 3,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 2,700
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 2,300
Baldcypress Taxodium distichum 2,000
Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2,000
Overcup Oak Quercus lyrata 2,000
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 2,000
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 2,000
Swamp Tupelo Nyssa biflora 2,000
Water Tupelo Nyssa aquatica 1,700
Yellow Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 1,600
Crab Apple Malus angustifolia 800
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 800
Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida 800
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis 700
Blackgum Nyssa sylvatica 600
American Plum Prunus americana 500
American Hazelnut Corylus americana 400
River Birch Betula nigra 400
Elderberry Sambucus nigra 100
28,900Total
Plot #
Planted 
Stems/Acre
Volunteer 
Stems/Acre
Total 
Stems/Acre
Success 
Criteria 
Met?
Average 
Planted Stem 
Height (ft)
1 8900890Yes3.2
2 5260526Yes2.5
3 647 40 688 Yes 3.5
8 7280728Yes3.8
9 728 2023 2752 Yes 1.4
11 1093 40 1133 Yes 3.6
Project Avg 769 351 1120 Yes 3
  Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data  Table 4. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all T PnoLS P‐all TBetula nigra river birch Tree 444 555555 141414555131313Cephalanthus occidentali common buttonbushShrub111Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 222 333555111222Cornus florida flowering dogwoodTree 222 111 333222333Corylus americana American hazelnutShrub 333 333444333Diospyros virginianacommon persimmonTree 111 1112111333Fraxinus pennsylvanicagreen ash Tree 111 333444444121212Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree50 50Liriodendron tulipiferatuliptree Tree 555 111 111 777444555Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree111Nyssa aquatica water tupelo Tree111111Nyssa biflora swamp tupelo Tree444Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree111Platanus occidentalisAmerican sycamoreTree 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 10101018181919 19 19 24 24 24Prunus americana American plum Tree111Quercus oak Tree1 1 1 54 54 54Quercus alba white oak Tree 333222999 141414Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2 111111232323181818141414Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oakTree 222 222888777Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2222333222Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 121212111111111111Taxodium distichumbald cypress Tree 555 111 66666610101022 22 22 13 13 13 16 16 17 18 18 18 18 18 68 27 27 28 114 114 166 88 88 88 172 172 172555555888777445445141415151515202020890 890 890 526 526 526 648 648 688 728 728 728 728 728 2752 1093 1093 1133 769 769 1120 594 594 594 1160 1160 1160Meadow Spring0.1560.1560.15610.02size (ACRES)Species countStems per ACRE10.0210.02size (ares)10.0210.0210.02Annual MeansMY2 (2020) MY1 (2019) MY0 (2019)Stem countCurrent Plot Data (MY2 2020)Scientific Name Common Name Species Type06122019‐01‐0001 06122019‐01‐0002 06122019‐01‐0003 06122019‐01‐0008 06122019‐01‐0009 06122019‐01‐0011
Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Meadow Spring MY2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Vegetation Plot 1 (9/23/2020)

Vegetation Plot 2 (9/23/2020)
Vegetation Plot 3(9/23/2020) Vegetation Plot 8 (9/23/2020)

Vegetation Plot 9 (9/23/2020) Vegetation Plot 11 (9/23/2020)

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0001
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.34365
Latitude or UTM-N:35.550308
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):200
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra10.30.3180.00.2 a R
Quercus phellos5 5.8 1.0 90.0 m R
Betula nigra67.11.1148.00.2 q R
Betula nigra78.61.2143.00.1 t R
Betula nigra99.91.3165.00.2 u R
Quercus lyrata10 9.9 3.6 100.0 v R
Taxodium distichum12 7.9 3.6 105.0 r R DBH?
Taxodium distichum13 6.9 3.5 88.0 p R
Taxodium distichum14 5.8 3.5 100.0 n R
Quercus lyrata15 4.6 3.5 107.0 k R DBH?
Quercus lyrata16 3.7 3.5 112.0 h R DBH?
Taxodium distichum17 2.7 3.4 70.0 f R
Quercus phellos18 1.6 3.4 90.0 e R
Taxodium distichum19 0.4 3.3 62.0 c R
Liriodendron tulipifera20 0.3 6.1 55.0 b R
Quercus lyrata23 3.7 6.5 60.0 i R
Liriodendron tulipifera24 4.9 6.7 55.0 l R
Liriodendron tulipifera25 5.9 6.9 55.0 o R
Liriodendron tulipifera27 8.2 7.2 54.0 s R
Liriodendron tulipifera30 4.2 9.9 65.0 j R
Quercus phellos31 2.8 9.5 120.0 g R DBH?
Quercus phellos32 1.3 9.2 95.0 d R
# stems:22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0001
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0001
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:200 °
a
k
u
b
l
v
c
m

d
n

e
o

fp

g
q

h r

i
s

j
t

# stems:22
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0002
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.34304
Latitude or UTM-N:35.550128
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):256
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Cornus florida33 0.3 0.5 40.0 a R
Platanus occidentalis34 3.0 0.9 115.0 h R DBH?
Quercus lyrata35 2.8 1.8 100.0 g R
Cornus florida36 2.5 3.2 100.0 f R
Quercus nigra37 2.3 4.3 120.0 e R DBH?
Quercus nigra38 2.0 5.2 100.0 d R
Platanus occidentalis40 1.8 7.2 94.0 c R
Quercus lyrata41 1.1 9.1 67.0 b R
Quercus phellos42 3.7 9.9 Missingi R
Quercus lyrata43 4.1 8.8 52.0 j R
Quercus lyrata44 4.2 7.8 51.0 k R
Quercus lyrata46 4.6 5.3 57.0 l R
Quercus lyrata50 5.6 1.0 15.0 m R
Quercus michauxii52 9.5 0.4 Missingo R
Quercus phellos53 9.2 1.3 86.0 n R
# stems:15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0002
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0002
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:256 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f

g

h

i

j

# stems:15
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0003
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.34261
Latitude or UTM-N:35.549423
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):260
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus alba60 0.3 0.4 50.0 a R
Quercus alba63 3.5 1.9 69.0 f R
Quercus lyrata64 4.7 1.5 92.0 g R
Quercus michauxii66 8.6 2.5 30.0 m R
Platanus occidentalis68 6.5 4.1 85.0 i R
Quercus michauxii69 2.0 6.1 42.0 e R
Quercus alba70 1.0 6.6 62.0 c R
Platanus occidentalis71 0.5 9.8 240.0 0.5 b R
Platanus occidentalis74 4.9 8.2 210.0 0.3 h R
Taxodium distichum75 7.6 8.5 120.0 k R DBH?
Corylus americana76 7.8 7.1 118.0 l R DBH?
Liriodendron tulipifera77 8.6 5.0 76.0 n R
Corylus americana78 9.5 9.7 122.0 o R DBH?
Quercus lyrata890 9.6 7.0 150.0 0.2 p R
Corylus americana891 7.5 9.0 155.0 0.2 j R
Diospyros virginiana1332 1.0 8.0 90.0 d R
# stems:16 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0003
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0003
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:260 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g

h

i

j

# stems:16
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0008
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.339046
Latitude or UTM-N:35.549514
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):105
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Betula nigra196 9.0 0.9 115.0 q R DBH?
Cornus florida197 7.7 0.7 40.0 n R
Betula nigra198 6.5 0.4 100.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis199 0.2 0.2 160.0 0.3 a R
Quercus phellos201 2.9 1.2 125.0 e R DBH?
Quercus phellos202 4.0 1.5 110.0 h R DBH?
Quercus phellos203 5.3 2.0 138.0 0.1 j R
Quercus phellos204 6.6 2.3 132.0 l R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis205 7.9 2.8 150.0 0.3 o R
Betula nigra206 9.2 3.1 105.0 r R DBH?
Quercus alba209 6.6 5.3 40.0 m R
Betula nigra211 3.4 4.5 130.0 f R DBH?
Quercus alba213 0.5 3.9 42.0 b R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica215 2.0 7.2 170.0 0.3 d R
Cornus amomum216 3.6 7.8 125.0 g R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis217 5.0 8.4 150.0 0.4 i R
Betula nigra219 1.8 9.7 175.0 0.2 c R
Cornus amomum1338 8.0 9.3 72.0 p R
# stems:18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0008
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0008
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
NX-axis:105 °
a k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0009
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.338805
Latitude or UTM-N:35.550187
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):30
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Quercus alba222 0.4 2.7 15.0 c R
Quercus alba223 0.4 4.0 55.0 d R
Betula nigra224 0.5 5.2 53.0 e R
Quercus phellos225 0.2 6.5 20.0 a R
Quercus alba226 0.2 7.6 70.0 b R
Quercus alba228 1.3 9.2 20.0 f R
Betula nigra229 1.5 7.4 72.0 g R
Quercus phellos230 2.1 5.5 75.0 i R
Betula nigra231 2.1 4.0 45.0 h R
Quercus alba234 4.5 1.0 35.0 l R
Betula nigra235 4.5 2.3 67.0 m R
Liriodendron tulipifera239 4.1 6.8 15.0 k R
Betula nigra241 3.9 9.6 60.0 j R
Quercus alba242 6.3 7.9 15.0 n R
Quercus alba248 8.5 0.2 35.0 o R
Quercus alba249 8.7 0.7 45.0 q R
Quercus phellos251 8.7 3.2 45.0 r R
Quercus alba254 8.5 7.9 45.0 p R
# stems:18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0009
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0009
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
N
X-axis:30 °
a
k

b
l

c
m

d
n

e
o

f
p

g
q

h
r

i

j

# stems:18
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Date: / / - / /
Taxonomic Standard:
Party:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Role:
Notes:
VMD Year (1-5): 3
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Species NameID X
0.1m
Y
0.1m
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm
Height
1cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage*
Plot 06122019-01-0011
Re-
sprout NotesMap
char
Sep 2020 Data
UTM Zone:17NLongitude or UTM-E:-78.337572
Latitude or UTM-N:35.54959
Coordinate Accuracy (m):0.5
Datum:NAD27
X-Axis bearing (deg):350
(dec.deg. or m)
Source*
Notes*
Plot Dimensions: X:10 Y:10
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of
Date last planted:
Check box if plot was not
sampled, specify reason below
New planting date m/yy? /
Platanus occidentalis279 0.9 9.3 85.0 d R
Platanus occidentalis280 0.3 8.5 105.0 b R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis281 0.6 5.0 107.0 c R DBH?
Platanus occidentalis282 1.4 5.8 170.0 0.4 f R
Platanus occidentalis283 2.1 6.4 185.0 0.7 h R
Platanus occidentalis284 2.7 7.3 170.0 0.6 i R
Platanus occidentalis285 3.3 8.0 127.0 j R DBH?
Cornus amomum286 3.9 8.9 60.0 k R
Platanus occidentalis287 4.7 9.6 260.0 1.5 m R
Quercus lyrata288 8.4 9.8 80.0 v R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica290 7.0 8.5 90.0 q R
Cornus amomum292 5.7 6.8 40.0 o R
Platanus occidentalis294 4.4 4.9 250.0 1.0 l R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica298 1.7 1.7 90.0 g R
Fraxinus pennsylvanica299 1.0 1.1 140.0 0.1 e R
Platanus occidentalis300 0.3 0.4 175.0 0.4 a R
Quercus lyrata302 5.0 1.3 90.0 n R
Quercus lyrata303 6.5 3.0 93.0 p R
Quercus lyrata305 7.8 4.9 80.0 t R
Quercus lyrata306 8.5 6.1 65.0 u R
Quercus lyrata307 9.2 6.8 84.0 y R
Quercus lyrata308 9.8 7.5 45.0 A R
Quercus lyrata309 9.8 3.4 40.0 z R
Quercus lyrata310 9.3 2.9 65.0 x R
Quercus lyrata311 8.6 1.6 115.0 w R DBH?
Quercus lyrata312 7.9 0.9 90.0 s R
Cornus amomum313 7.5 0.4 60.0 r R
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
THIS YEAR'S DATA
SpeciesID X
(m)
Y
(m)
Plot (continued):06122019-01-0011
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)
ddh
(mm)
Height
(cm)
DBH
(cm)Vigor* Damage*
Re-
sprout Notesmap
char
Sep 2020 Data
source
Notes*
# stems:27 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name X
(m)
Y
(m)
Height
1 cm*
DBH
1 cm Vigor* Damage* NotesSource*

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
Height Cut-Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.):  10cm  50cm  100cm  137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT C LASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 
c
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm Sub-
Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- =10
(write DBH)
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
___ ___
Form WS2, ver 9.1 **Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample ?100%.
Expl anation of cut-off
& subsampling**:
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0011
Y:5m
X:5m(0,0)
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a").N
X-axis:350 °
a
k
u
b
l
v
c
m
w
d
n
x
e
oy
f
p
z
g
q
A
h
r

i
s

j
t

# stems:27
map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair,
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, M=missing
*DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown ANIMa
Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.