20100200 Ver 1_Application_20100315

O?c, W?ATF?9OG
Olqiii? T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number or General Permit (GP) number: 31
1c- Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes ? No
1d: Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
21401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
tf. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ® Yes ? No
th. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information

2a.
Name of project: Craven 206 Bridge To Pipe Replacement SR 1262, Dover-Fort
Mosley Creek
WBS Element Number 213.202511 Barnwell Road Over
2b. County: Craven
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Dover
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: 213202511
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): N/A
3d. Street address: 105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
3g. Fax no.: 252-830-3341
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page_ 1 of 11 8t,
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2@ Wion Bozo
4$& r!4 '

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name: Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable): North Carolina Depratment of Transportation
4d. Street address: P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip: Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.: 252-830-3490
4g. Fax no.: 252-8303341
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Craven 206 SR 1262, Dover-Fort Bamwell Road Over
Mosley Creek
Latitude: N 35.244260 Longitude: - W
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 77.419547
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: WA acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Mosley Creek
a Tributary of Neuse River
proposed project: ,
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water. C;Sw;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1262, Dover-Fort Barnwell Road is a paved secondary state highway. Woodlands and Agriculture dominate the
landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0 Square Feet of 404 Wetland Impacts For The Bridge To Pipe Replacemet.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
60' This site is part of a longer adjacent stream system
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge To Pipe Replacement ; the existing bridge has deteoriated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Existing 18' Long Timber Bridge will be replaced with a Proposed 14' -0"x 8'-7"x45' Aluminum Pipe Arch.
Excavators,Dump Trucks,and Crane Trucks will be used for the Bridge To Pipe Replacement. '
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
? Yes ® No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Jay B. Johnson Other. NCDOT
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
January,2010
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
? Yes ®No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file' instructions.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
I a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ? streams - tributaries ® Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary
W1 ? P ? T Fill Bottomland ® Yes ® Corps 0 Sq
Ft

Hardwood Forest
? No
? DWQ .
.
W2 El P ? T Fill Bottomland ® Yes ® Corps 0 Sq
Ft
Hardwood Forest ? No ? DWQ .
W3 ? P ? T Fill Bottomland ® Yes ® Corps
OSq. Ft.
Hardwood Forest ? No ? DWQ
W4 ? PDT ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Sq. FL
2h. Comments: No 404 Welland Impacts
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ - non-404, width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ®P ? T Fill Mosley Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 20, 21,
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 21 LF
3i. Comments: 21 Linear Feet of Stream Impacts
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4E Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete.the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tnr-Pamlico ? Other. Nome
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
61 ® P ? T Fill Mosley Creek ® Nos 1410 Sq. Ft. 960 Sq. Ft.
B2 ®P ? T Fill Mosley Creek ® Nos 1410 Sq. Ft. 960 Sq. Ft.
133 ®P ? T Fill Mosley Creek ® Nos 1410 Sq. Ft. 960 Sq. Ft.
6b. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: See Page 6-A For Total Buffer Impacts
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form -.Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 44. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4E Total open water impacts None
4g. Comments: None
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
511 Total None
5g. Comments: None
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ?Tar-Pamlico ? Other. None
Project is in which protected basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number- Reason Buffer Zone 1impact Zone 2impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary impact required?
B1 ® P ? T B4 Fill Mosley Creek ® Nos 1410 Sq. Ft. 960 Sq. Ft.
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total butter impacts 5640 Sq. Ft. 3760 Sq. Ft.
6i. Comments:
Paged ? -A
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December, 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are No Wetland Impacts for this Project; Therefore,The Wetiand Impacts have been minimized to the greatest extent
feasible, with no impacts occurring on the project
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment; no equipment will enter wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
"
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Pennittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?coid
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version `

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) -required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires megaton. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: None
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
pennittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
WA
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a . Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ? No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b . If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The Project will be De-Watered. Water will be pumped around the ® Yes ? No
installation site into a diffuser bag and a Sediment Bag. Silt fence will be used on
this project
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a . What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? NIA RoadwayBridge Project %
2b . Does this project require a Stonmwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The Project will be De-Watered. Water will be pumped around the installation site into a diffuser bag and a Sediment Bag.
Sift fence will be used on this project.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stonmwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
® DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? NIA
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW,
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other: N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
® Coastal counties
? HOW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
® Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stonmwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la . Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/stateAocel) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b . If you answered "yes° to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ? No
Comments:
2- Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Welland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Welland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fad permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered 'no,' provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ®No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Determination was made by Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC, May 15, 2009 and Mr. Stephen Lane,NCDCM,May 22, 2009
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ® Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson,NCWRC and Mr. Stephen Lane,NCDCM
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA<iesignated 100-year floodplain? ® Yes ? No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Pipe designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson March 8, 2010
ApplicanNAgents Printed Name Ap 'ca Age s Signature Date
(Agents signature is v on if an oration letter from the appricant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 1 0, 2008 Version
- - CRAVEN 206
SR 1262,13OVER FORT BARNWELL ROAD
OVER MOSLEY CREEK
DOVER USGS QUAD MAP AND SHEET NUMBER 6
OF THE SOIL SURVEY OF CRAVEN COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4564 a f.
MAP NUMBER 3720456400J aoou'
MAY 1, 2009 '
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 2B.202511 s? -
NP
W*E ob L/
•i m
c / 1
530159
L
55
--
240206" Rv
J
CRAVEN 206
. 51 OWB5 `'•? Ra " SR 1262,DOVER FORT BARNWELL ROAD
waaDOver EaaLwerRd OVER MOSLEY CREEK
:l YlY '? Y= 547581.1986
X= 2471856.5935
i N 35"-14'9"
W 77A-25'-10"
N 35.244260 DEGREES
- 1. W 77.419547 DEGREES
0 6001,200 2,400 3,600 4,800
Meters
! •:- ,
i ? r.7
Sutton, Michael W
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 9:29 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Hughes, John R; Casey, Timothy J; Price, Brad N
Subject: RE: Craven County Bridges
WRC does not request an in water work moratorium on these projects.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:97 PM
To: Wilson, Travis W.
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Hughes, John R; Casey, Timothy J; Price, Brad N
Subject: Craven County Bridges
Hey Travis.... Division 2 is planning to replace these"Craven county Bridges with pipes.
Are these anadromous fish locations, and if so,we would like the moratorium dates.
Attached are maps for your use... Thank you Sir and have a great week-end .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties. '
1
Sutton, Michael W
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:33 AM
To: Sutton, Michael W
Subject: RE: CAMA Jurisdictions
Hi Mike,
I have made site visits to the three bridges in Craven County at your request and have
made the jurisdictional determinations as listed below:
Craven Bridge 21 on SR1003 over an UT to Swift Creek - No AEC Craven Bridge 150 on
SR1101 over Black Branch - No AEC Craven Bridge 206 on SR1262 over Mosley Creek - No AEC
As we discussed this morning on the phone, the original email request had Craven 150
listed as being over a UT to Brice's Creek at N39°00'25" and W77°02'52", it appears that
it is actually located over Black Branch at N39°00'98" and W77°03'28". Let me know if you
have any questions on this email or if I may be of further assistance. Hope you have a
nice weekend! _
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: Sutton, Michael W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 3:01 PM
To: Lane, Stephen
Subject: CAMA Jurisdictions
Hey Mr. Stephen..... please check out these three bridges and see if they are CAMA
Jurisdictional at your leisure.... thanks ...have a geat week-end .... mike
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
' 09- ??_? fO I
NO St'RVEY REQI IRFD F-OR:\1
PROJICCC'I' INI.OWM ILIION
P,o;ccr No:
Jl73S `. ,: 28.202511
P, A No,
F JrreII f f.l'S: I (: lei P. r,nif Rrrprir, C1.'
C>xaav. Craven
flr,cwn-1111:
lnrrhnv: X SUte ? I cdc:'al
X 1"e ? No l4v:vr '11 7:,': GP 31
P....... c, ll; cr,-ljvirs: Replace Bridge No. 206 on SR 1262 (Dover-Fort Barnwel! Road) over
Mosely Creek with pipe.
SL'M:NIARY OF CUI:ITRAL RESOURCES REVIEW
80C1 1:::ac11.111101 V! ICki :1 a cm :Nc.s. resuhi of r el o0t: un[: C u!:CIUSi i!l v. HPO quad maps, historic
designations roster, and indexes reviewed on 14 December 2009 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or 55 properties in
the Area of Potential Effects (APE); 4 SS recorded on the proposed, off-site detour route (CV 1209 - George
Washington West House, CV 1165 - Russell House, CV 1154- Richardson House, and CV 1042- W. T. Hawkins
House). Craven County GIs mapping (2009), including 2007 aerial, and tax information (2009) indicated
undeveloped properties in the APE and one SS (CV 1209) immediately adjacent (viewed 14 December 2009). The
latter contains an undistinguished circa-1940 domestic building and circa-1920 agricultural building and a mid-
nineteenth-century coastal cottage," remodeled in the early twentieth century, of local significance. The buildings
are located at the southernmost end of the property, approximately 700 feet south of the APE and screened from it
by a cultivated field of relatively high elevation. Constructed in 1961, Bridge No. 206 is neither included in the
NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, nor representative of any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type. County survey
and related publication include no properties in the APE; two of the four SS on the proposed detour route (CV 1154
and CV 1209) are discussed in the survey publication, pp. 521 and S22 (Peter S. Sandbeck, The Historic Architecture
of New Hem and Craven County, North Carolina (New Bem: Tryon Palace Commission, 1988). Google Maps "Street
view" confirmed absence of historic structures/landscapes in APE (viewed 14 December 2009).
JA;r;i E.t?:Jrmu;,•'on nj '../:r rir,' uru6`itf?!r irllurn::u;nr: prnra?:: a r.+iul.,la iusis.f?n r.'rrsnxarhJt' p1t'.1.''c:i!{`:
!;Wl rh. PC W - Itn unida,!!iJirt:I hi.rlu!TC rdY,pe,'lccs ih- :LC :IP1:: APE centered on existing bridge and extends 100
feet on all sides to encompass proposed 50-foot length of project and 60-foot existing/ proposed ROW. While not
recent the county survey is welt-executed and records no properties in the APE. County GIS/tax materials support
absence of significant architectural resources. As the project is state funded, GS 121-12(a) applies; in addition, its
one Federal permit area is subject also to Section 106 review. No National Register-listed properties are located
within the APE or on the proposed, off-site detour route (no improvements planned); no National Register-listed or
-eligible properties are located within the permit area. No buildings, structures, or landscape features of concern
appear in the existing ROW, to which the proposed work will be confined.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATfON
Sce. Lwached: APE map; 2007 aerial map
FINDING lit' NCDO CLLTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED - Historic Structures
Cultural 1(i5011.TC5 SJlCCialia
IL
Dale

Project Tracking No. (/nlernat Use)
09-11-0010
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: SR1262 County: Craven
WBSNo: 213.202511 Document: Minimum Criteria Sheet
F.A. No: None Funding: ® State ? Federal
Federal (USACE) Permit Required? ® Yes ? No Permit Type: Individual
Project Description:Replace existing timber bridge (No. 206) with proposed 14'-0"x 8i-7"AASPPA pipe
with headwalls, SR1262 (Dover-Fort Barnwell Rd.) over Mosely Creek in Craven County. The project is
to be completed within the existing 60ft. right-of-way and measures approximately 50ft. in length (APE).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology on Thursday,
December 3, 2009. No previously recorded archaeological sites are situated within the currently defined
APE, immediately adjacent to the APE, or general vicinity (5 mile radius or more). A review ofNRHP
listed properties/districts within Craven County was completed and identified no such resources within or
adjacent to the project area. The mapped soil unit within the APE is Masontown mucky fine sandy loam
& Muckalee sandy loam, frequently flooded soils. These soils are described as nearly level, poorly
drained, and very poorly drained with high water tables at, or near the surface and frequently flooded for
long periods of time. Archaeological site potential is very low in association with this soil type, as
traditionally, people like to habitate on dry land. In addition, aerial photographs and topographic maps
were inspected by the cultural resource specialist to gauge environmental factors that may contribute to
historic or prehistoric settlement within the APE. Overall, the APE encompasses hydric soil conditions
and no topographic variation; additionally, Mosely Creek does not appear to be a natural water source, but
rather a channelized ditch, which are common features throughout the outer coastal plain, further
diminshing archaeological site potential. A review of Craven County historic maps placed no structures or
any other features within the currently defined APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The lack of existing archaeological or historical resources, along with hydric soil types, no topographic
relief, the crossing of a man-made water channel, and the diminutive and restricted nature of the APE
make it unlikely that any significant cultural resources would be contained within the construction
footprint of the proposed project. No further archaeological work is recommended.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ? Photos ?Correspondence
? Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT CULTURAL RESOURCES PROFESSIONAL
NO SURVEY REQUIRED
"No Survey Required"farm forMmor Trartaponalion Projects as Qualified in the 1007 ProgmmmahcAgreement
NCDOTArchaeo%gy & Historic Architecture Groups
Resources Specialist
Date
."No Surrcy Heyuind"fwnfo/Mumr Trmvpnnwiw Prtmjeclsm Qoul edm the 2007 Pmg?ic Agreemml.
NCD07'Archmology h H/noneArehileclure Gmo pr

Orn

i O
o
C? N
?
y N
?C:-
O r) m
?m ? o

? ? Co
o? rn -n
C) F"i -D
Z?

rb rn

? ::D
rn CYJ mrn
?
y n ?
C) ZE rn

Qo rn ?
< o ~

C
??
0 0
rnm
N
0 n
o ?
$ o
a
O
O
?l
r I} I m ~ g
2 N I \{ N? W?
` n
c? (v 2
I2 n
m , Cc ?gi
g$ rnl o ?Nk88
CD "4::o
?I g w w
m
?, rn
m g I I ??
`" w I I j ro
I ?
I? I
m I
mm q ? I o ,I
N? ? I
m DIRT ;OZ
H w
moo ?
,a
m

o o ~

rn
n
?'

m g
C m
?I ? N ? ? o
? Z
- r-,
? c
n
_ 0
%O
4-,

o0

rz
C) cn
Ib
Z

rTl
? ?

I ?

w o,

N
g 0
rr, O C I N
?

C) o w
L4

Z d
N o
r
O
N
N
-Ti
m
F-
°
o N
F
0
co
?
u
mmm
:ro
° p N
rnmC)
? n
C)
n
.. II rn
N
aaILJ
0
I?~m
I' I N
a

_ ?
'

I

Lri
I ..
40
eY ARE

'
'?
f K
Ln 4? w
.
?,
?o
4 ?i I o

I
I "r, r _ o $?
ICD
o N y? c?

I mm
o
co Do Do
?
X n -,, 0 NN
DD ?j z z
m rn
I o 00
Z N?
I ?' o
n
t
? ??2
?
r -I o
N
?
G?
o ?y
n
1
D
t
x
z N
?I
m x M-
o
Do c) ? ?
?

N
k cn
?
II
`I D W vl y
~ = ?Z7? II
rn o o +?

? O
I v
-71
I O ?
:EE
0
0
x 0
0
2 ?
A?
y
i ?
o ?
y
2 ?
gym ?
c? C
m?
mo
a2
y
x
a
N
N
E8 OVN
ORJO ON
C')
2W2??7 4
I
co
GJ W
o.
N
m
I XI C I
D
I c? I I
I ?I I
N
I M ? F- I
I r co O I I
I m ?I I
rn _0
U.)I
o m" o I " 2 c
? m ? ? ? I Nm o
oT
mao
m I m?? D
? I I \? z
m CD I I
° ? ? I ? I I rv
mV _ I S I
o n s m LJ _
r-M
-< I I I om m
m m o I i 2b -
I z
tic
I I I ??,?, N
o
I ? ? I
Na

I ? I I
0
°?
I
m I
I ?I I
7u

I
o o r
co o
n _

H
D
g i D Uj
z ? m '-i Ej
c
n O
z7 n i p
n m
C7

S D 'n

?
m m m
m
TI

g

O r v
r o n
O
('? Z
0 n
S
? S
D

o p
<m
o ? -o
n
C Z
to Z
m z m
O
I I ? I ;:u
D ?owo=
I I I ?o D
I I zM
>
? D 0
r
oc I I ?D N z
r 7l z-n On
z
4
N? I cn I m A
z
nI n
?-a0 I oC no
=DX I I N mZ
my?CO I u r17 M o
OC
=
° m I ?MD DO
C
Z N
O I C ?u Z I o I NCYJ
co I = I.. I Z c..,
Z L I m ° c?
m z m I I -? o?
O o _r D
o<
mz I I mz
?o I
#
O N
m O m N? I I °?
CC) m
°
O
on m-nno I I
?m I I oD
m
N Fri
I I I °? o
I mmo TN
N [p - ?7 07
m? I I I
'rl
' N?I moo, I
I C I
o? CDn o n m
r
I I ?? N Dn O< n 0
I ( INFO :2<m<m
Zz A z0
mn O # o
p °•O ?u N
I ° I ?z ?mz
\ Nj W N Co)
r m m
?m T m? 7 -< z -
N
= D U10 ? OVi O _ m6? 0
O ;n-0 W I :D:,l O O r N
ZE D N ? n r
O n m n 0 m?u m
m Z N -<- m .. 0 m
o m o
:EE
o
n r n N
N
e
a
I
0

i
r?

f
R
I
l

a
i
3
0
g
R
ti
x
°m
m

?^C
F 9 b Q IE
m
?l ?
C ?? ?nhL
N
m SgIM1UER PONi ? ?l ?
Z
ti
F- EDCE OF Pp VEMENi
EDGE OF Pq yEMENi
m
n
m
? pp a
m a ;
s I> ° v
e
-? A

K
A ?
_ 1
1
m
n D
(n ?' mo
r j
o ? ? t
z
? T

o r- z
o n
m

r
z
O
I
A
? m
m o
D
m
y
D
r
A 8 a s$ e
> ? °o m ? m s a ? ? ? ? q
A ? 3 ? T 4 Q ?
?-? s m A m m R;+p_°
Z A m F R
H Q
N Z
D
o ? N
L m
2
m
s ,
? o
o?
ti
rri
O
i n
m
Z
i r

m
v
t O o b® O © B• f
m
a _ $
g o
? g ? z i 9 m
m A m ?

y?
lyyG..??
V
H
-+C
i?
ny
H
m?
am
i?
u,
mom.
H

w i ? 2 c? C n C
Ln
~~ ~ 2m n, i
rn m
pp :7,
o n N I? n m °r
g
n v ,q 2 rn z n o m
i 2 2 n == i? N
p i n m a y y 0
rri
2 i° girn
w g z r ri
° m y DD
rr o n
~ rn o y O
m m m ?? s
7
L
n
p n,
o?
7y
wN
ti
m°p
rnm
m
0
? m
rr,
T ~ 2
2 ? a\

C

O

y C C

rn
7

nn
r
rn
O
rn
2
y
n
Z
Do
OO
2

r
r?
z
x
r?
=o
0
0
rn

Bridge To Pipe Replacement, Craven 206 SR
1262,Dover-Fort Barnwell Road Over Mosley Creek;
Craven County Replace Existing 18'x 23.3' Clear
Roadway Timber Bridge With Proposed 14'-0"x 89-799x
45' Aluminum Pipe Arch
N 35^-14'-39"
W 77^-25'-10"
Erosion Control Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control measures according to plans.
• Grading of slopes; 1.5: 1= stabilize with Class B riprap
• Seed all disturbed areas as soon as final grading is completed.
• Clean out and/or rework all temporary sediment control measures after
significant rainfall event (or as otherwise needed). These measures should be
maintained until a permanent vegetative cover is established and project is
complete
Pipe Installation Schedule
• Install erosion/sediment control devices per plans.
• Remove material while limiting, as much as possible, material and sediment
from entering the stream and/or escaping from the project.
• Prepare pipe foundation while taking care to limit material and sediment from
entering the stream and/or escaping from the project. Where possible new
grade should be below the existing streambed. Bedding material will be washed
stone.
• Place new pipe and compact fill.
• Install slope protection on outlet and inlet ends of pipe (Class B Granite riprap).
• Establish permanent vegetation as soon as possible
• Remove sediment control devices after project has stabilized and permanent
vegetative cover is established.