20091346 Ver 2_More Info Received_20100225

OR-k34LO 01.0
1i
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
' Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.atcassociates.com
February 24, 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
Ms. Cindi Karoly, Supervisor
' 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://h20,enr.state,nc,us/ncwetiands/
' Cc:Jamie Shern
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
' Via Hand delivery
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone Tel: [phone], ext 31
' Reference: Additional Information Request
New Hill Place
Oak Creek/Haw-Cape Fear River Basin
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
ATC Project # 45.27923.0007
Dear Mr. McMillan and Ms. Karoli:
o?
?'cy
As you requested in your letter of January 25, 2010 ( a copy is attached), Mr. Benjamin V.
Wilson, P.E. of ATC Associates has reviewed the items requested and are addressed as
follows:

1

Please note in the original application many of the streams impacts noted are ephemeral
streams require to be noted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. These streams do not meet
the 19 point criteria used by NCDENR. The actual stream impacts under the 401 rules are
significantly less than the impact in linear feet noted on the various tables in the Preconstruction
Notification documents.
1. Please re-submit your site plans on full plan sheets at a scale of no smaller than 1 "=50'
with topographic contours shown. Additionally, please submit one (1) data CD offull size
plans in TIFF Group 4 format (black and white, not grayscale or color). If the plans are
too large to store in TIFF format, they can be stored in PDF.
Attached are 17 pages of the impact plans 11x17 at a I"= 40' scale showing the affected
areas. Full sets of civil and landscape plans have also been enclosed.

ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
February 24, 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
Ms. Cindi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://h20,nr.state,nc,us/ncwetlans/
Cc:Jamie Shern
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Via Hand delivery
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone Tel: [phone], ext 31
Reference: Additional Information Request
New Hill Place
Oak Creek/Haw-Cape Fear River Basin
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
ATC Project # 45.27923.0007
Dear Mr. McMillan and Ms. Karoli:
As you requested in your letter of January 25, 2010 ( a copy is attached), Mr. Benjamin V.
Wilson, P.E. of ATC Associates has reviewed the items requested and are addressed as
follows:
Please note in the original application many of the streams impacts noted are ephemeral
streams require to be noted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. These streams do not meet
the 19 point criteria used by NCDENR. The actual stream impacts under the 401 rules are
significantly less than the impact in linear feet noted on the various tables in the Preconstruction
Notification documents.
1. Please re-submit your site plans on full plan sheets at a scale of no smaller than 1 "=50'
with topographic contours shown. Additionally, please submit one (1) data CD offull size
plans in TIFF Group 4 format (black and white, not grayscale or color). If the plans are
too large to store in TIFF format, they can be stored in PDF.
Attached are 17 pages of the impact plans 11x17 at a I"= 40' scale showing the affected
areas. Full sets of civil and landscape plans have also been enclosed.
New Hill Place - Additional Information
Oak Creek/Haw - Cape Fear River Basin - Holly Springs, Wake County, NC
February 24, 2010 - Page 2
2. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage
The proposed provisions for aquatic life passage for the pipe roadway crossings will be
designed and installed as per the USA CE Nationwide General Conditions including burying
the pipe below the streambed of the channel to allow for the passage of aquatic organisms.
Where multiple pipes are required one will be buried for passage. As the transportation
plans are finalized they will be forwarded.
3. Please provide building envelopes for all lots with wetlands, streams or buffers on the
site plans.
Building envelopes are shown on all lots with wetlands streams are buffers C3, C4 and C21
and of the civil plans.
4. Please indicate proposed lot layout as an overlay on the site plan.
The proposed lot layouts are shown on drawings C3 and C21.
5. Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
The proposed sewer lines have been designed and located as shown on the Utility Plan C-
21 however, the utilities have not been designed to construction level detail. The civil
drawings show the potential sewer outfall locations are out of the way of the impacts.
6. Please provide an inventory of imperviousness surfaces in each drainage area. The
inventory should include all proposed building footprints, roads, driveways, sidewalks,
gravel-surfaced areas, amenity areas, etc. A Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) must
be provided for any drainage areas that exceed 24 percent imperviousness. For each
BMP, provide a completed BMP Supplement Form with all the required items (see http:
Hh20.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmpforms.htm). Per NCAC 2B 15A: 02H.1 000, a "drainage
area" is defined as "the entire area contributing surface runoff to a single point." If you
intend to phase this project, you must provide the DWQ a conceptual stormwater plan
for the entire property.
An inventory of impervious surfaces is shown on Storm Water Plan SW-X. An exact
inventory is included in the preliminary nitrogen export calculations in the storm water plan
included with this submittal.
7. If this 401 Water Quality Celtification is issued you will need to provide documentation of
the local government's approval of the stormwater management plan (SMP) for this
project by providing EITHER:
• A valid approval letter and one copy of the approved SMP (including plans and
calculations),
OR
• One set of storm water plan details and calculations stamped as "Approved" by
the local government.
New Hill Place - Additional Information
Oak Creek/Haw - Cape Fear River Basin - Holly Springs, Wake County, NC
February 24, 2010 - Page 2
Attached is a letter from the town of Holly Springs approving the "Master Plan Level"
approval of the project. Final approval of the storm water plans will be forwarded once they
are received.
8. Please provide a indirect and cumulative impact analysis for the project. Please see
DWQ's policy for guidance on our website at:
http://h20.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/documentsllnteriminternal olicyCu ulativeimp ct.doc
A qualitative indirect and cumulative impact analysis for the project is attached.
Please contact Ben Wilson at [phone] or [phone] if you have any questions or if
we can be of further service.
Respectfully,
ATC ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PC
,-..
? BAR
•'?s'•°??y
We
r a SEAL
` ?'L`••?:NG??&4 5a'
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
;om
Attachments: NCDENR Letter of January 25, 2010
Town of Holly Springs Preliminary Approval Letter
Indirect and Cumulative Impact Analysis
Revised Minimization and Avoidance Narrative
Drawings 1-17 Impact Zones in V=40 scale (11x17)
Drawings C-3, C-4, C-21 (24x36)
Storm Water Plan SW-X (24x36)
CD with letter and all attachments.
Enclosures: One Copy Preliminary Stormwater Impact Analysis
One Copy Preliminary Nitrogen Export Calculations
rWA
P
.a_
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
January 25, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Kyle Ward
Spring Investors, LLC
1000 Darrington Drive, Suite 105
Cary, NC 27513
Subject Property: New Hill Place
Little Branch/Oak Creek [030607, 18-7-6-1-1, C]
DWQ Project # 09-1346
Wake County
REQUEST FOR MORE INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Ward:
On December 23, 2009, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your application dated September
25, 2009, with Public Notice issued by the USACE on December 22, 2009, and received by the DWQ
December 23, 2009, to fill or otherwise impact 0.802 acres of 404/wetland and 3,410 linear feet of stream,
to construct the proposed mixed-use development at the site. The DWQ has determined that your
application was incomplete and/or provided inaccurate information as discussed below. The DWQ will
require additional information in order to process your application to impact protected wetlands and/or
streams on the subject property. Therefore, unless we receive three copies of the additional information
requested below, we will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this additional
information. If we do not receive the requested information, your project will be formally returned as
incomplete. Please provide the following information so that we may continue to review your project.
Additional Information Requested:
1. Please re-submit your site plans on full plan sheets at a scale of no smaller than 1 "=50' with
topographic contours shown. Additionally, please submit one (1) data CD of full size plans in
TIFF Group 4 format (black and white, not grayscale or color). If the plans are too large to store
in TIFF format, they can be stored in PDF.
2. Please provide cross section details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage
3. Please provide building envelopes for all lots with wetlands, streams or buffers on the site plans.
4. Please indicate proposed lot layout as an overlay on the site plan.
5. Please locate any planned sewer lines on the site plan.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://h2o,enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
One
NorthCarolina
a ura ltf
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

?.? _ ,_ _ ?, ?i tl? ,.,!?.
?.- ? ??? ;

AMilyplAr
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue colleen R Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
Subject Property: New Hill Place
Dear Ms. Manuele:
DWQ Project # 09-1346
Wake County
NOWN111NIIIIIIIIII IMM11411
Thank you for your attention. If you have any questions, please contact Ian McMillan or me in our Central Office in
Raleigh at [phone].
Sinc9r.e1y, r
. ..... . k
/ 1{
X
h, ly/
Cyndi Karoly, Supervisor
.,,,-401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit
CBK1Um
cc: Jamie Shern, U.S, Army Corps of Engineers - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Lauren Witherspoon, DW`Q Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Ben Wilson, ATC Associates, Inc., 2.725 East Millbrook Road, Suite 121, Raleigh, NC 27604
Filename: 091346NewHiliPlace(Wake)IP—Comtneiititig_�,etter—USACE
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit Cull
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 NorthCarohna
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, Noah Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Naturallil
Internet: http,lih2o.ef)r.state.nc,uslacwetlandsI
Ar Equal Oppodunily Affirmative Action Employer

yAIIO;
1876-,l4il.
t

THE TOWN OF
jx!
P.O. Box 8
128 S. Main Street
Holly Springs, N.C. 27540
www.hollyspringsne.us
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mayor's Office Fax:
[phone]
February 19, 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: New Hill Place Development Project
DWQ Project #09-1346
Mr. McMillan,
At the developer's request, this letter is to confirm the Town's review and
approval of the following plans for this project: a Master Plan for the entire
development, a Subdivision Plan for Phase 1, and a Development Plan for Phase
1. By approving these plans, the Town has approved, at the master-plan level,
lot layout and horizontal utility and roadway configurations. We are happy to
provide a copy of the master plan level documents in order to illustrate the level
of detail required by the Town for master plan approval. Construction drawing
suemittai, approval, ana permitting will ne ine next stages or
development approval process that occurs through the Town.
Also, this letter is to confirm that the thoroughfare that runs across the northern
part of the project has been shown in this general location on the Town's
Thoroughfare Plan for at least 8 years as a future planned and needed roadway
connection. This thoroughfare connects to NC55, and was approved by the
NCDOT Controlled Access Committee.
I am hopeful that I have provided the information that you have requested.
Should you need anything else, or any more detail, please feel free to contact me
at 557-3935 or at stephanie.sudanokholl, ssprin sg nc.us.
Sincerely,
Step. Sudano, PE
Director of Engineering
SLS/dra
cc: Carl G. Dean, Town Manager
Mr. David George, Kite Realty Group
Mr. Kyle Ward, Springs Investors, LLC
Correspondence 13305
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
INDIRECT AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ANALYSIS:
The impact of the construction of the shopping center is the result of the rapid growth of
the Holly Springs, Wake County Area. The development studies showed that the
significant growth already occurring in the area has created demand for additional retail
space. The addition of these desired commercial retail development will substantially
reduce the amount of travel required of Holly Springs residents to obtain comparable
brands.
The development of the roadway for the project will significantly improve the flow of
traffic in the area. With regard to cumulative impacts, the construction of the east-west
connector for Holly Springs will likely result in additional development in the area.
However, the areas at three of the four quadrants of the intersection that will be created
have y been developed or have already been approved for development at this time.
The area surrounding the connector roadway has been heavily developed with industrial
commercial and residential uses and is in need of better access.
With regard to cumulative impacts in the area the Wake County landfill is not likely to be
developed into hard surfaces but once closed will likely be developed into open space
such as parkland or golf course use.
Because the thoroughfare was already on Holly Spring's transportation improvement
plan the cumulative impact of the development does not significantly affect the long-
term development of the area.
The thoroughfare plan and the proposed commercial and residential developments are
consistent with the town of Holly Springs long-term development plans area therefore,
the cumulative impact of the development is not likely to be greater than the eventual
development anticipated currently by the town I'll express. The Holly Springs
development plan is attached.
Transportation projects do have an impact on long-term development of an area.
However, because the transportation plan and development plan has already been
established and accounted for in the development scheme the only question is when
the development will occur.

N
W -XL E
s
Map Not to Scale
Department of Planning & Zoning
Town of Holly Spi-ings
PO Box 8l 128 S Main Street
Holly Springs, NC 27540
[phone] fax [phone]
www.hollyspringsnc.us

I I JM
C::1
1 Z = 7_-
7--t 7
?r J
Future 1540 Loop ?
V
1
W
Q
u
Y

Southern Wake Expressway,
n,

Legend
0 Low Density Residential
0 Residential
0 Mixed Use
0 Regional Center
0 Heavy Industrial
0 Business Park
® Business Park/Progress Energy Land
® Progress Energy Land
Central Core
Community Growth Area
Possible Regional Area
Comprehensive Plan Study Area
0 Village District Area Plan (see back)
0 Northeast Gateway Plan (see back)
0 Southern Gateway Plan (see back)
m

South errf-Wake Expressway
r? L I?
I
1 4

Legend
Study Area
IN Attached Residential
Civic/Institutional
0 Community commercial
W E Mixed Residential
0 Mixed Use
S Office
Not to Scale 0 Park/open space
0 Single Family Residential
Departrnent of Planning & Zoning Outside Study Area
PO Box 81128 S Main Street
Holly Springs, NC 27540
[phone] fax [phone]
ww .hollyspringsnc.us
Legend

I fL
Study Area
IN ® SWexressway
Business
Commercial
W E
High Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
S Mixed Use
Not to Scale Very High Density Residential
Greenways
Gateway Feature
Outside Study Area
Legend
®® Study Area
Commercial
N Mixed Residential
Mixed Use
W -4?- E 0 office/Professional
-7r 0 open space
Proposed Greenways
S
Not to Scale Gateway Feature
Outside Study Area
Wp
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
February 24, 2010
Mr. Ian McMillan
Ms. Cindi Karoly, Supervisor
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
Internet: http://h20,nr.state,nc,us/ncwetlans/
Cc:Jamie Shern
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Via Hand delivery
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone Tel: [phone], ext 31
Reference: Additional Information Request
New Hill Place
Oak Creek/Haw-Cape Fear River Basin
Town of Holly Springs
Wake County, North Carolina
ATC Project # 45.27923.0007
Dear Mr. McMillan and Ms. Karoli:
As you requested in your letter of January 25, 2010, Mr. Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. of ATC
Associates has reviewed the item requested below and are addressed as follows:
This Office believes that the brief avoidance and minimization discussion located on
page 7E was grossly inadequate. It is the opinion of this Office that the impacts
proposed for Impact Area Nos. 1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14, could be avoided by bridging the
stream at these areas. Furthermore, it is the opinion of this Office that the impacts
proposed for Impact Area Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, II, and 15, could be avoided by
configuring the site layout and by proposing parking decks where applicable.
A revised minimization and avoidance narrative is included as an attachment to this
letter.
New Hill Place - Additional Information
Oak Creek/Haw - Cape Fear River Basin - Holly Springs, Wake County, NC
February 24, 2010 - Page 2
Please contact Ben Wilson at [phone] or [phone] if you have any questions or if
we can be of further service.
Respectfully,
ATC ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PC
aN-•
AAA
*SSSJO-%?y
%
i a SEAL 4` `
10361
y?gti1iN v ,???
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
lom
Attachments: Revised Minimization and Avoidance Narrative
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
REVISED AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION AND IMPACT JUSTIFICATION:
Holly Springs is a rapidly growing community in Wake County. The need for additional
retail space in Holly springs is driven by this rapid growth. This site was initially selected
for the accessibility to surrounding roadways both current and future. The owners
desired a development that would serve the needs of Holly Springs and surrounding
communities and yet have a minimal impact on the environment. The owners have
employed a professional design team who has utilized modern design techniques to
ensure a minimal impact on the environment throughout the building process and
maintenance upon completion.
Alternative sites were considered in the service area which consists of the NC 55
corridor in Holly Springs. The requirements for development were:
• Adequate access for a regional retail center to serve Holly Springs and
surrounding communities.
• A site where the required utilities are in place that precludes the need for
additional impacts for long utility connections.
• Access to the nearby 1-540 corridor which is just north of the adjacent closed
landfill site.
• To be large enough to accommodate the proposed scope of development.
• That could be improved to a marketable state to justify lot prices to keep the lot
sizes large.
• Improvements would justify a return on investment.
• Could be developed with minimal impact on the environment when compared to
other sites with comparable hydrogeologic characteristics.
Because of the wish of the Springs Investors to sell the property for a development
which would be the highest and best use at a fair market price and to create a
development that would keep environmental impacts to the property to a minimum the
development plan required the creation of lot sizes that would generate revenues to
make the land purchase viable.
After researching the area it was determined that no other sites met the aforementioned
criteria.
Page 7A
The site selected and property in the surrounding area is shown on Figure 1 below in
red along with the streams shown on the Wake County iMaps site. While many of the
"blue lines" shown below are not intermittent or perennial streams as defined by either
the NCDENR rules or the US Army Corp of Engineers guidelines and as noted by the
approved jurisdictional determination on the site they do indicate that all of the property
in the area have geology that is eroded and has ephemeral channels, as well as
intermittent and perennial streams.

3 5? -4
lµ ' r
1 - _ ? ?L. - y ?';(? {:III 4y S C]yy ?rS
I
?I.
F, ± V -
IV,
Figure 1- Alternative Sites Map
r a.
r_
?tl L b
?r, I?
Page 7B
The town of Holly Springs is located on a fault line at the the edge of the contact point
between the Deep River Triassic Basin and the metamorphic rocks of the Carolina Slate
Belt as shown on the geologic map below (Figure 2).

r

Figure 2- Wake County Geologic Map
Page 7C
Because of this geologic location the area has a number of eroded drainage features
due to the easily erodible soil structure and the associated groundwater hydrology.
These features result in perched water and ephemeral flow immediately following
rainfall. As such the Wake County iMaps show a number of features that only flow
during rainfall events (See Figure 3 Below). Many of the "blue lines" shown below are
ephemeral channels and are not intermittent or perennial streams as defined by either
the NCDENR rules or the US Army Corp of Engineers guidelines as noted by the
approved jurisdictional determinations.

J ?
v w F ? ? 5
, N
t ` f . .

11

k;
F' I

5
r T ]y

? L
r ? J

?I- i
Figure 3- Wake County IMap Showing Ephemeral Streams
Page 7D
For the development at first a smaller connection to NC 55 was initially planned.
However, the Town of Holly Springs and the NCDOT indicated that the location of the
parcel made it conducive to the extension of the Holly Springs Connector Parkway. The
majority of the impacts of the project are due to the extension of this roadway which
would have occurred at or near these locations whether regardless of the development
of the property.
Avoidance and minimization has been achieved by moving the Parkway as far south as
possible. This reduced the amount of streams impacted by the roadway project. The
impacts of the roadway have been reduced by using retaining walls where possible as
well as using buried culverts to facilitate pathways for aquatic life.
All of the commercial developments and access roadways were placed on high ground
where possible and were planned for areas of the site that minimized impacts to
jurisdictional streams either for NCDENR rated intermittent or perennial streams or Corp
of Engineers rated intermittent or perennial streams.
Water quality has been protected by using Best Management Practices as required by
the Town of Holly Springs in accordance with the 2007 NC DENR Best Management
Practices Manual which is the most recent version.
The development is also providing 30 feet buffers on both sides of the intermittent and
perennial streams in accordance with the Town of Holly Springs storm water rules. The
storm water BMPs will include ponds for nitrogen reduction and stormwater control in
accordance with the ordinances of the Town of Holly Springs which are similar to the
Neuse River Rules.
Page 7E
ADDITIONAL RESPONSE
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION AND IMPACT JUSTIFICATION:
NCDENR in a letter dated January 25, 2010 indicated the opinion that the impacts
proposed for Impact Area Nos. 1, 2, 3, 12, 13 and 14, could be avoided by bridging the
stream at these areas.
In addition, NCDENR indicated the opinion that the impacts proposed for Impact Area
Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, II, and 15, could be avoided by configuring the site layout and
by proposing parking decks where applicable.
These items are addressed as follows:
First it should be noted that overall many of the streams impacts are ephemeral streams
required to be noted by the US Army Corps of Engineers. These streams do not meet
the 19 point criteria used by NCDENR. The actual stream impacts under the 401 rules
are significantly less than the impact in linear feet noted on the various tables in the
Preconstruction Notification documents.
In fact in the shopping center area the streams impact using the 19 point criteria is less
than 250 feet. This has been accomplished by dividing the shopping center in to 4
separate parcels with large cutout areas to avoid streams and by the extensive use of
retaining walls to minimize impacts to streams.
The remainder of the impacts for streams under the NCDENR 19 point method are due
to the construction of the Holy Springs Thoroughfare.
As you noted in your letter, some of the impacts proposed for Impact Area Nos. 1, 2, 3,
12, 13 and 14 could be avoided by bridging the streams, however, the cost of bridging
these streams would make the overall cost of the development impractical. The impacts
for this roadway have also been reduced by the use of tall headwalls and by alignment
of the roadway perpendicular to the streams and by alignment of the low points in the
roadway as much as possible and still meet the NCDOT roadway standards. Many of
these impacts are located off of New Hill Partners property. And some of these impacts
are to ephemeral streams noted by the USACE.
Page 7F
As you noted in your letter, some of the impacts proposed for Impact Area Nos. 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10, II, and 15, could be avoided by configuring the site layout and by proposing
parking decks, however, the cost of parking decks as well as the difficulty of accessing
the buildings from parking decks would again make the development impractical.
The site layout has already been configured to reduce impacts to streams and wetlands
to the maximum extent possible. As can be seen on drawings C3 and C4, all of the
roadways, building and parking areas, storm water management ponds, and other site
improvements have been laid out to avoid streams and wetlands to the maximum extent
and still have an economically viable site.
A parking deck is not feasible in a suburban shopping development. In order to have an
economically viable development parking decks were avoided for this center. It should
again be emphasized that the design of the development has avoided streams by
separating the development into 4 areas. Further minimization, including the use of
parking decks, is not economically practical, or practical for attracting shoppers.
It should also be noted that several of the stream crossings are intermittent streams on
the main roadway corridor and all of the streams noted in that shopping center area are
either ephemeral or intermittent. Reducing impact to these streams would have minimal
effect on the preservation of water quality.
Also, as noted on the drawings, the Town of Holly Springs requires a 30 foot buffer
around all streams. The Storm Water Management Plan is also required to meet
nitrogen reduction requirements and Best Management Practice requirements.
Page 7G
CIT
o
& M N W
I-mAicAflAMS
IMPACT AREA #]
MARIAN BUFFER
t ! t t `? 1 t 1 '' ` ' RVFRBASIN
CAPE FEAR
? \ ) ! ? ? f r ? 1 ! 1 11 rl ,' • ' ' ZONE Cl'B 1 DISTURBFD . AREA = 0.38 AC,
( f ! !l 1 1 \j M ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA = 0,11 AC.
l + , i / I A.L CAPE FEAR RMRBASIN RmA1 r
BUFFER. DISTURBANCE 0.49 AC.
LFNGTf I OF jMpAmD cHANNFL 410 LF
I l ? / h I
WIDTH= 3 F. (APPROX.)
AVERAE G SIRE"
A? 0,Q282 AC,
ANTQ BANK IMPACT AREA. (L
/ / ) - / / f t r L) 1 l t? IZ
/ / / / r f I !c ( TOTALVMr4-,M IMPACT 0.05 AC.
?? ?r )
r
FIELD 4 A/D
30' C PB FEAR RI BASIN
f
ROWAN BUFFER (7YP.)
f Tor' of a I i ? r
BARK (TYP.)
ZONE CF$1(Ili!iPACIEA)
J r f
Ile
`! / / ! ? ?? •- '? [ , `/, ZONE CFJ32 (IMPACTED).
WETLAND (IMPACTED)
t f i I/ / r Jf` •+, -'rI" ?. r'' •?.. r v. •,! ?.`.' ?`. J'I r ' I
U
w
V
A.
U?
a?z
4
I
Cl hd
ox
d
IMPAGT AREA #2
f ?! I I' I I L ` y I! f f / CAPE FEAR RISER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
U.
f{{\ 1 I I 11 y !/ 1 f I r ZONE CFB x DISTURBED AREA 0.33 AC,
{ I I i 1 ''ZQNE CFB , DISTURBED AREA = 0,12 AC.
,
` QTAII CASE FEAR RIIER BASIN RIPARIAN
I ? (I { I I\ jti 1! yt 1 t ? f l f ??
I I` 1 I I 1 1 f 1 / I I BUFFER DISTURBANCE = O. S A, w
J
j I I I I I t { 1 1 / / ?/ LENGTH OF IMPACrED CHANNEL, 389 LF .
AVERAGE STREAM'UVIDT i 2. Yr. (APPROX.)
I 1 I / f ! r IMPACT AjM (L x Avg, W ? 0,4223 A.C,
f I I '? 1 1' / / BANK TO BANK
ff ! i l I I ?,I !f 1 Iff I/ ?l J /? i? / ?! ?? TarALWETLANDINlFAC' -0,94 AC, F
I I 1 f / ? / /
Ile
t 1
R°IyrANguy l"Yr.)
z
0P F? f f f 1 ? /
'NK (T
`fi't ?,? t`' \?' ?'? '. 11, t'?I?{<<? ??' ?
t
2 ..
N "N
t 1 ! y a y 1( y '4 z
t
i'
ZONE C B 1(IMPACTED)
1 1 a o
ZONE CFB2 (IMPACTED)
I
11A11y1j{
WEMAND (IMPACTED)
? 1 II I f i r ; _ ?? a
I
. IMPAC'Z` AREA 93
I I l I J r' 1i /? ?\ CAPE FEAR RIVER. BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
O
? ?-- .? f r 1 1 ? ? ? ? r ? ? / ? r ? . ? !? BONE CFSI DISrJRBET3 AREA.; 0,27 A.C.
.. ! J / / / ! ! ! f / , r ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA = 0.11 AC.
TQ?`.AL CAPE rEAR RIVER BASIN RIPAPrarr
BUFFER DISTURBANCE= 0,38 AC,
LENGTH OF IlMPACTI+;U CHANNEL = 289 LF
r / / ! I I J ! I' / f / I 2,5 FI', (APPROX.) AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH ?
! ?' •- .r'f ? / ?•-. / / / ? BANK TO BANK IMPACT AREA (L x Avg VU) 0, 0166 AC.
TOTA WNILAND IMPACT « 0 AC.
RO U IMPACT AREA #3A 00 BUFFER
CAPE FEAR RMR BASIN RIPARIAN
,!
I?PAC!?' ? 3' 1 l ZONE CFB1 DISTURBED AREA 0. 13 AC.
! 1 !' ' `? I / ZONE CF$2 DISTURBED AREA w 0,06 AC,
TTAL CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPA AN
?._L •.? -- ,,.?.._ ?., 1 CE = 0,X9 AC.
L BUFFED DISFURBAN
LENGTH OF IMPACTED CHANNEL ? 1371.I+
AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH = 2,5. Fr. (APPROx,)
BANK TO $ANK IMPACT AMA (L x Avg. W ? 0,0079 AC,
T(YrA}L ViEU ANp IMPACT 0 AC.
aRnMATac?y TioN J /
OF RE•-R TE©/S??tEl
I ti}?
/
A
•(
1
1
y

1~ ?? /. ICI / x r r .
x'01 ? I r/ 1 t !
}`CAPE FEAR RIVER EAAIiJ? t /
\ \ / / /p RIPARIAN 13UFEER (TYP.) 1 1i /
lo, Ile
TOp OE. .r `•.
ZONE CFM (WACTEB)
ZONE CFB2 OMPA.CTED)
WXTLAND UMPACTED)
1
U
D
Via. ?
M III
.co
w?
H?
a
C-4 00
a
r
m

meADAS
LIPS 1 41 N-.--L
7 7
?'? II I I ! I / Az, ?, I f r r
.../.. /_ a,? < ,/.. _ ?, !f !! I 7f f; , •-ter
71
7FE . RkVER/ / J, / .
CAPE
Ety.{7ynf.)i
/RIPARIA{d
-By
/ - - - r / 7
O
?------
r FIELVLOQATEp
4E.
f,e r lyn
i ?. r J ' / ys 1 ?.. ..?.-.
v- 1
.
+ ? ? , ?• IMPAC
FEAR RW.BR T AREA #4 BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
,jl
r I ?. f ONE CFBI. DISTURBED AREAS = 4,39 AC.
f C , I 7ANE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA = 0,20 AC,
rTO?`AL CAFE F? RJR BASIN RIPARMN
!I i / BUFFER DIS17MANCE = 0.59 AC. '
! LENGTH OF IMPACTED CHANNEL 393
AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH 1.5 FT. (APPROX.)
BANK TO BANK IMPACr AREA (L x Avg. M .= 0.0135 AC.
-'OTAL 'V WAND IMPACT ? 0.217 AC.
Al
rl rr ?? ?
rJ °?
J 'r
/J
J
r
J
r
r
I 1, f ,
/f
r r
f f 1
t / ` r . , ZONE CFBI (WPACTEC)
! ZONE M2 (MPAMD)
v 'LA.ND (EMPACMD)
I I !I i
I / I
U
w
?d0
r
4
C
N I
co )I o
x a
IMPACT ARMA #5
f r { 1 1 IF
tl I I / CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPAPJAN BUFFER
, (I I ! ZoI?E cFB1 DISI?7RBED AREA 0.08 AC.
1 ? ? ? I I ? I r ?r ? ?•? ? , ! , J r/
ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA := 0.04 AC.
/ / l ? I i I I/ f fr ? ? ?, ?, 1 i
f f / !! "" 11 r rl/ ? / i J f r TOTAL CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RTPARYAN
BUFFER DISTURBANCE m 0,12 AC.
/ i i I /?rf 1 f/ ` 1 ?!! r f ?! / r f
1 I I ! / I f y } ! LENGTH of IMPACTED CHANNEL =» S? LF
j I I 1 i ,l ! / / / 1 f! 1 f i f f' t AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH =1 FT. (APPROX )
AREA (I, x Avg. Vii 0,0020 AC.
J ! /li fl' l / / f J fig l? ?f i f /
BANK TO BANK IMPACT
TOTAL MWLANn IMPACT ? 0.026 Ac.
l 1 I {! j (1 I? ?? fJ (! Ir rr ! l 1{ r r r? ? i
r
I i J ? I I? ? ?\l \ II 1! 11 ?? l 1 t f f 1
1 / { ?? ?lI(I?? ` 1111
{ { f I ( ` I30' CAPE FER RM JASIN ? ? f r
I I { { I l ?? I I f RIPAtt)AN eU i I(TYP 1 /
! 1
I C ! { I i I I 1 1? 1 !f 1? ? 1 1 ? 1 { { ?{ !!
?, I 1 I I? 1 1? fI ?' if 1 1! f? I / I ?
I r 1 I! I 1{ t , ?-
j t C j ) TOP
h I I 1 1 { 1 / BANK TYP.JI , E
f ?
{ I I I? /lE
? O
CATED ETAND (TYP.) ! / ?• ., ,,. I
I ? ? 11 Il 1 ? i [ , ? ? i ? {? f/ ? ? r •. I I
L 0
/ 1 J ?I CI 1 { J? ??{ f ? '.
,r? 1
1 f 1 / ZONE CFB2 UMPACTED)
?? •1 : ......
fl f J l ;- - I 1 ! { / / J WETLAND (IMPACTED)
i r% fI 1 / 1 f 1 ! I / 1,?r ?y
f

a ,
?I
z
a
00
o a
A ?
jmpACT.REA #6
?CAFE FEAR R TIER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE CFB1 Dr&rMED AREA = 0,10 AC.
ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AIWA = 0.05 AC,
TMAL CAPE. FEAR RIVER BASIN SPARTAN
BUFFER DISMRBANCE = 0,15 AC.
LENGTH o IMPACTFD CHANNEL = 89 V '
AVBRAGR S 19" WIDTH X . (AFPR( )
j f ? j ? /? ! ? ! ? ,? ?, -' ? ? "•' r- IMPACT TO CAN$ PACT ApRA (L x Avg, W) ? 0,4424 AC,
TOTAL WETLAND IMPACT 0 AC,
of
ANK
f I / / r a' c+'E FEn RiVEj ensfN
/ r TRIP (Apl BWFER PYP?Y
ell
. le
Ile .1
wr???`_'.:„""^..... ?'?..."?......"w.`"?.r`„'-."_"?"' I -n-w,.nn.?. ?.?..........oucr...^..??.ss.??+•sxwt<? + rn.wr-v«•:.v?.s:,w.va a»„•nc,a,. ,,ay .
f rr r
C- r
r
Y ?" r ?.. / f 1! ! I! / ?ONE. CFDI (IMPACTED).
- / / 1
r - 1 ! ZONE CFB2 UMPACTED)
le, Yl? ?' 1 f d ,
f f 1 1 yVL LMD (IMPA=D)
co)
A$
w
H
FIN

04
filMchDAMS
PAC's AREA #7
No ` r CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN MARIAN BUFFER
Toro ZONE C `BI DISTIMED AREA 0,09 AC.
AOK
\\ ` - \ ! ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA= 0405 AC,
7 -1
TOTAL CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN
IN
BUFFER DISTURBANCE = 0.14 AC.
i -. ,1+EGTH.OF IMPACTED CHANNF-L = 74 LF
AVERACxE STR AJM WIDTH 0.5 FT. (APPROX,j
" 1 I • ' , o' bnA Rivnn \ BANK TO BANK IMPACT AREA (L x Avg. W) = 0. 0008 AG..
IN '
4 `
TMAL)METLAM IMPACT ? 0.306 AC.
ARIA -wrnf"tT..?
1*0
°`ti ? ? ??`\ .4 ? \? \\ \ ?? ? \ \?? rte.'--,. .? ? ? ?\! ??
?,_d,..'ry? .ti's-^i?. •, \? \ \?? \\ `` \ ? ? `\ _??.. `? ~1 ``\ \ ":?
n
I's
14-
IN,
IN%
ell
41
/ r
i
1
• ZONE CFBI 6MPACMD)
ZONE 0FB2 UMPAC'1' D)
VMI?D (IMPACTED) I
?v
E-4
U?
05
?a
00
00 :p
C
..
1-4
1 ?l
}
} r
}
li If f
IMPACT AREA #S
BUFFER
?. / l--. M7M,I I' / 30'/CAP, FF(R (V? IBA Ir! C E. FEAR +R BASIN RIPARIAN
IPAftAN uFF T P.y %I f ZONE CFB1 DISMRBED AREA = 0,00 AC
f ZONE CFBZ DISTURBED AMA ? 0.00 .
.. - ! , • f? / //-7--7 TOTAL CAPE FEAR ?R BASIN RIPARIAN
%' , / r -- .,? _ I f f ?f f f I / ! fJ BUFFER DISTURBANCE = 0,00 A.C.
-LENGTH OF IMPACTD CHANNEL w 0 LF
- r ! r Ayi
7-:? 0,0 FT. (APPROX.)
AVERAGE SAM WIDTH
BANK TO BANK IMPAM'I'AREA (L xAvg, ? M 0 AC.
f r ? r TOTAL WMAND IMPACT 0, 179 ACS
777-
/ /
/ ! r
Ile
7-7
f' _. f } y
,
f _f
r f ? t 1
?tll?t
I
\?1 ?4tf h ji ? ,?
/ - ?` 7AN CF)3 (IMP
ooll Is'
.
f / 1 TUNS CF B2 (IMPACTED)
-el -1
r `I I
W AND (IMPAC ' D)
U
O?
w
w?
N ?EE
? d
y r '
r
h
0.
®eic?tuiit?s

Z FACT AnWA. #9
r
1 I I I I ff I 1 t f .- ' r .? f I ?? ?? !/,! ?r /? fN, ' CAPE FEAR ?I? BASIN WP?AN BUFFER
! j I j I f f I I I 1 f' j !! - -? ZOirlla CFBI DIMMED AREA= 0.00 AC.
! I I I 1 I ! I I I [ . - / e 1! f ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED AREA 0.00 AC.
I I TOTAL CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPAR[A
I j I I l! I I I 1 1 r .' f! , 1 1 , BUFFER DISTURBMCE = 0.04 AC.
1 I f I I I I I( f 1 ,, ?? .'f f' jj/ _ LENGTH OF IMPACTED CHANNEL 0 LF
/ f AVERAGE STREAM WIM"M = Ob FTC. (APPROB.)
1 1 f 1! I I I I , 11 1 1 / r ?/ ?,? / 1
BANK TO BANK R'ACr AREA (* x Avg; W m 9 AC,
e
l1 1 1 E ?? L I 1 ` } / f' i / / r? I TOTAL W `LAND IMPAM ? 0.020 AC..
f 1 I! ? j ? i l! ?f ?? 1
17FZL11 KLATEV N
30' CAPE FEAR RIVER\ 6A5114, / I
J 1 ' !/ /RIPARIAN BUFFER (IYPI)
TOF 4F5a l r
BANK (iYP) ?, j f f
Pilo
1 ff f! !? ?? f r ` f f
....
??
I 1 ? ? I E ! ! I J! 1 ? r1 !? f ? ? i _ - . ? ? / I
J
11 el
ZONE CFJ31(IMPACxE)
ZONE CFB2 (+lPACiD}
,? G, r ? `? yam" ~ ? ? ._ •-„ ? ? / ? / / `„' ` `, . ? ? .? ? ?? ? ?»~
f .m ` ?.. WETj,AN t+aaPAG'X})
0,
a
Nil
wi
c??Q¢u j
7
IMPACT AREA
j.? 3ASTCAPE FEARR ER N RIPARIAN BUFFER
0.25 AC
! 4f 1 ZONE CF131 DISWRBED AREA
f 1 I ?' ' /
AREA a,
F i ! I 11 !!? 1 + /. ?' I + I ZONE C`B2 DISTURBED 13 Ac,
.r I ! ! 1 ,' j j i' [ ! TOTAL CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN
9 it ! f 1 I? ` f,. ?1 I ! BUFFER nTS"i'URBANCE 0,38 A0,
\}` !? I ! 1 jl I1 X I + G ' ` 1J1 f (LENGTH OF IMPACTED CTE = 253 L
f II I i `"1 1 J \ t ' • ' + I f I AVERAGE STREAM WIDTH ? 1 FT. (APPROX.)
? AC,
i 1 1 11 I f ?,. ~~ ' I l! ! BANK TO IMPACT AREA (I, x Avg, o,aa
BANK
0 A.
. C.
I TQTAL WETLAND IMPACT - .
j
f / J
/ rf I ? ? L•, f
el,
?
e?(TYP.) d' CAPEAAR RIWR. BASIN y r l -? ° ., \
IRIPARl?+N GUFFE* (TrP,? r \ \ ?\ \
ZONE CFHI (1MPAD)
ZONE CF332 (1MPAC'TFI?)
.1
WETLAND OM. FACTED)
r
Hel
Doug

1
N
0
I
c??,^xIt i
V Y
{L a
f? aADANS
M'AL'T AREA # 1 1
T d 0 U 11 ARE CAPE FEARER BASIN. RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE CFB1 DISTURBED AREA 0.00 AC,
(1 01 P $ ? ?' f f - ! ZONE CFB2 DISI'tlR}BED AREA = 0,06 AC..
? , j T YrAL CAPE FFAR PJVER BASIN MPARIAN
AC.
15
- l , 1 \ ` ? M_ _. ?? -.. -- , .., _l 1 ! I •?' r, ! / ' BUFFER.DIMRBANCE R 0.
LENGTH OF IMPACTED CHANNEL 84 LF
AVERAGE SMEAM 1%gDTH = 0.5. FT. (APPROX.)
HANK TO HANK IMPAG A12FA (L x Avg. V n 0.0010 AC.
-==?! I -? - y ..? l.? !? ? ``lam `p`I'AT? UETLAI D IMPACT = 0.00 AC.
T-? WAY-
ell
y', T
Ile
/ C r ?• r ., 0 ? " •+? r , •?• Il?w. may, `' .•
1 ( • -. `9 CIiP"r&?R RIVd? fA5fN' ` f''
•, ,, RIPARIAN BupR (TYp.) \ 1 1 1' 1 I I [ I '?
Top or
IN ?\
r
I f
3 i? CAPE\FEAR R'ER © SIN a
RifIARIAN UFF£R (TYp.
L ? E ( 1 1?1,?,,1 rlr ?• ?
ZONE CFDI (fMPACMD)
ZONE CFJ32 (IMPA D)
WMAND (IMPACT' D)
U
©o'
H '
Ur-4 i
m
o °
0'
8 r r
'•cpjyj ?
IMPACT AREA #12
( CAPE YEAR RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER
i TONE CFB I DISTURBED AREA = 0.59 AC.
1 f ZONE CFB2 DISTURBED ,ARUBA ;= 0.21 AC.
1
1 TflTAD CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN RIPARIAN
BUFFER DISTANCE a 0.$ AC.
L 599 LF
LENGTH OF IMPACTED CI?AN?IE
1 1 (APPROX.
I f j, , • ; , AVEItAGrF SI'REAI WIDTH ET,
VG, V0 0.027 AC,
BANK TO BANK M PACTAREA (LXA
I f r TOTAL W? IMPACT = O AC.
3W CAPE; FEAR RIVER BASIN
( RIPARIAN BUFFER (Typ-)
I, ! ? !
yp? I l TOP OF
f ` `C BANK. (7YP.)
X!00
I AP
1
\yp 2;j ZONE
C1 ['ACTED)
.,' It ( ? ? I ? 1 1
T f ( ( I f ` ZONE CFE2. OMPACi'ED)
WETLAND (IUPAC EDP
i
7
U
r?
U
oil
z
cWi?
pp p
N d ?
O r
o

Ell
0
t
Ile
milli
U?
a?
a?g
r
N ?+
? r
r

ZONE CFB1(IMFACMD)
zoNE Cl'B2 (1MPAcrED)
VMMAND UMPAMD,
7U?^
i?
U?
ar
0
O N ?
0
r
6
oil
9
U?
a
co
N
t7 coo III O
?. a r
N
2