490027_PERMIT FILE_20171231

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 14, 2018
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
671 Pisgah Church Rd
Stony Point, NC28678-9230
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Millstone Dairy Farm
Permit Number AWC490027
Iredell County
Dear Permittee,
As of this date, our records indicate that the above -referenced permit issued to your facility has
overdue fees. It is both a condition of your pennit and required by Rule 15A NCAC 2T .0105(e) (2) to pay
the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days of being billed by this Division.
The following invoices are outstanding:
Invoice Number
Due Date
Outstanding Fee $
2017PR003953
6/3/2017
180
Failure to pay the fee accordingly may result in the Division initiating enforcement actions, to
include the assessment of civil penalties. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit may result in a
recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water Resources who may issue
a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars against any "person"
who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit under
authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. Therefore, it is imperative that you submit the appropriate fee as requested
within thirty (30) days of this Notice of Deficiency.
Please remit the payment, made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), in the above amount. Please include Permit Number on your check and mail this
payment to:
Division of Water Resources — Budget Office
Attn: Teresa Revis
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
-eontd.-
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
1636 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
919-707-9129

If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Animal Feeding Operations
Program staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
IA
Debra J. Watts, Supervisor
Animal Feeding Operation, and
Ground Water Protection Branch
cc: Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section
WQROS Central File (Permit No AWC490027)
_- fYw:�lT.�ef=�'7 WI-�_a�cr$I�R�ial71 SIL _

AP Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: it Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tine O Complaint C)Foflow-ue O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: rival Time: d S Departure Time: 1 OR ounty: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: IL Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title; Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:U Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Numbe,xr!--__�
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Nun -La er
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharues and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
�s
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
E] Yes ❑N A ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214/1011 Continued I
— J
MUM. . . `
�s
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NE
E] Yes ❑N A ❑NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 214/1011 Continued I
— J

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection-
Waste
ns ection:Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
D signed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):V
5. Are there any immediate 1�int tyof any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ ent at, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o,❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yesto,
E] NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 7r] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C] NA [] NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Eviden a of Win rift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Ilk
13. Soil Type(s):
C�a �
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination
r i �lti:� ■
17. Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes *�o
18. Is there a lack of properly operating ste application equipment? ❑ Yes;C
Rewired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the C readily available? if yes, check E] Yes //"�I�� quo
the appropriate box.
hecklists Designaps ase Agreements er:
21. Does record keeping need im ent? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑
'Waste Appl' tion Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis
❑ Rainf❑ SStoc�ie d 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑NA E] NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA [] NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NE
Weather Code
I Sludge Survey
❑ Ygkn INa-1
A
[3 Yes A
❑ NE
2/4/2011 Continued

-]Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
�
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yeso
E] NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ No %;<ZA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑Yeso
❑ N
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
C] No A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency cifi,at;nnc as required by the ❑ Yes❑ NA E]NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.] Yes o NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or GAWMP? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency'? [] Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinss of facility to better explain situations (use additional napes as necessarv).
�L /rad���
0
OAar_::,
C N o s y,�
��re� c�,s�vz"5,�f^e P�+^JK� e
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011

0
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - ® Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: n Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Beason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: r Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: _ A-4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: —Title -
Onsite Representative:
,,z,J
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
F -
Swine
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er
Wean to Feeder IVon-La er
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
pry rounry
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated voltun.e that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
❑ Yes
M.No
❑ NA
[:]NE
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes
C#44@
❑ NA
❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
PLNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
2/412011 Continued
Identifier:
Required Records & Documents
Spillway?:
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
&Mu
❑ NA
Designed Freeboard (in):
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
Observed Freeboard (in):
the appropriate box.
VF—
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
M No
0 NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
[J -No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
['No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
N"o
�NA
--
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
\\
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes
5,No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Auplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. el
❑ Yes Vj- No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 7Y -C.3 LL„ j!fr) ey) _
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
M.No
❑ NA
[:]NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
C#44@
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
❑ ❑ Stocking[] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
D�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2/412011 Continued
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
&Mu
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
VF—
[:]WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does recordke g need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
�.Alo.
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste A pliZ ❑Weekly Freebd ❑ Waste is ❑ Soil Aafalysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑Weather Code
❑ ❑ Stocking[] Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rainfall
Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
J;�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
2/412011 Continued

r
Facfli Number: jDate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No SIP NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No *NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus Ioss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field. ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes [�tNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
E] Yes ....� C3 NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No #E�NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes t#'I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [:J�M ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question. #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
C' C. e% y 8 v, [..64— —,-, ;(3() C U W ,S
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
.214/2011

Division of Water Quality .
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access A
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: Q ��� ounty:� Region: 006
Fa ame: 4 �����lL� - Owner Email:
&Ame: +c/ Phone:—=`
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: `�)� A )() V
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Numbed r'
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer Iq
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity POI).
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turke Poults
Other
Longitude:
Cattle
Design Current
Cal2adU 11
1plip1aw"A E '..'
ki .
ANN
r.. ,
Mongol
� �• � 'l�
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No 11ff71NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ YeAdlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ZNA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page l of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
Are there any immediate Oeal'9 tto the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[] Yes
Structure 5
NA NE
o N NE
Structure
Yes o
[] Yes
❑ NA E] NE
E] NA [] NE
If any of questions 46 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environ atal threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [] Ye o NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes NA NA [] NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Am3lication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes NA [:] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below Yes �01:1 NA [] NE
ssi�nding Q,I�*aulic Overload Ground Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PA Q TAN > 10% or l0 lbs. otal P horusFailure to rporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
5��ide`of Acceptable CropzWindowEvidence of Wind Drift cati utside of Approved Ar a
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops di rom those designated in the CAWMP? 1 Y NA NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improveme ?� El Yes NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design r wettable` E01Y ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? 1
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [] Yeso E]NA NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes o E] NA NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certific of Coverage & Permit readily available? �Yes"lea NA NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate wbox.
�_.0P c ks egn�aps �Lease
Agreements []Other:
21. D record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. es o ❑ NA NE
Waste Applica ' n [�kl Freeboard is oil An lysi ❑ Weather Code
ffRainfali cking op Yield Minute Inspections y and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sly-u—dggee Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YesNo NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes N A [] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

FaciliNumber: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
_4�:rFailure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ N ompliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o [] NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NTA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail o properly dispose of dead animal=th =ours=nd/or document Yes �<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Ye► [j NA E] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emer ency situations as required by the ❑ Yes�,�'Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, aver -a ca ion
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E: ea ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YRS answers and/or any additional recommenj%ation.n oth r col ent-s..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
s
�r
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
0"'
Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date:
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑NE
=2
2/4/20.1.1
1—Y,

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
June 14, 2016
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
671 Pisgah Church Road
Stony Point, NC 28678
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Re: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Millstone Dairy Farm/Facility 49-27
General Permit AWC490027
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Director
On June 8, 2016, staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Water Quality
Regional Operations Section (WQROS), inspected the Millstone Dairy Farm and the permitted
waste disposal system. We wish to thank David N. Riddle, who was present and assisted during
the inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jan „18ealle III, Environmental Specialist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
enclosure: Compliance Inspection Report dated June 18, 2016
jb
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources j Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office I 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Meoreaville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division'of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number- ,490027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490027
Inpaectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Iredetl Region:
Date of Visit: 06/08/2016 Entry Time: 03:30 pm Exit Time. 5:00 pm Incident g
Farm Name: Millstone Dairy Farm Owner Email:
Owner: J Norman Riddle Phone:
Mailing Address: 671 Pisgah Church Rd Stony Point NC 286769230
Physical Address: 1163 Snow Creek Rd
Facillty Status: Compliant ❑ Nol Compliant Integrator:
Stony Point NC 28676
❑ Denied Access
Mooresville
[e-mail]
704-876-3369
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35" 64'4U" Longitude: 80° 52'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right
Genereal location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi, north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David N Riddle Operator Certification Number: 2.1434
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
On-site representative David N. Riddle Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
06/03/15 > Waste Analysis > N = 4.90 Lbs11000 Gallons
11/20/14 > Waste Analysis > N = 0.96 Lbs/1000 Gallons
04/18/16 > Soil Analysis
ib
Phone: [phone] Exi
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility : J Norman Riddle Facility Number. 490027
Inspection Date: 06/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle r
Cattle = Dairy Calf
15
13
Cattle _ Dairy Heifer
80
0
Cattle - Dry Cow
40
7-7
Cattle - Milk Cow
170
48
Total Design Capacity: 285
Total S$LW: --359.250
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freoboard
Waste Pond WSP 18.00 20.00
Ir
;
page: 2

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility : J Norman Riddle Facility Number:
490027
10. Are there any, required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Inspection Date: 06/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Discharnes & Stream Impacts
Yee_ No Na No
❑
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0
0 ❑
[a
Discharge originated at:
❑
PAN?
❑
Structure
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Application Field
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Other
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ 0
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
0 ❑
trees, severe,erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
El0
11
Elwaste
management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits,'dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
_ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
XU No Na No
10. Are there any, required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
[]
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWC490027 Owner- Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 06/08/16 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine
Waste Applipation Yea No Nj D
Crop Type 1 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Tlrnolhy, Orchard, & Rye
GfH98
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19 Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily avallable?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Woekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑ 0013
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
yes Na Na No
❑■❑❑
page: 4

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility : J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection pate: 06/08/16 Inpsecticn Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance.
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Application Field
Lagoon l Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yee No Na No
El
El
❑■❑❑
❑❑■❑
❑■1111
❑ ❑ E ❑
�tAINNE
page: 5
El
11
❑0110
,❑
❑ E
❑
Yea No Na No
❑
❑
❑
�tAINNE
page: 5

Type of Visit: 49 Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: *Routine 0 Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: EZM Arrival Time: ► Departure Tiine: County: Region:
Farm Name: [ �t
Owner Name: � l"; j
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Title: Phone: I/
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Certification Nulttber+—_
n
Longitude: '
Discharees and Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [] No [DNA ❑ NR
Discharge originated at:. ❑ Structure ❑ Application field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
1 Page I of 3
❑ Yes
�� �.
M
11 ani 7r
w Vi
1 P
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
E]Yes
[] No
[] NA
❑ NE
Feeder to Finish__��
Farrow to Wea
■-
i'.. 4 I x" :Y � , «.:pd v,y..: !
f
■ 1 --
4
-k=..
Discharees and Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [] No [DNA ❑ NR
Discharge originated at:. ❑ Structure ❑ Application field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
1 Page I of 3
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
E]Yes
[] No
[] NA
❑ NE
2/412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 - Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[] No
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
] Yes [] No C] NA 0 NE
❑ Yes [] No [] NA. ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ❑ No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑No
Page 2 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
2/412011 Continued I

Faelll Number: - Date of Inspection:
( 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes []No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reviewerllnspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[] NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21412011

T J`J
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
05-11-2006
This plan has been prepared for.-
Millstone
or:
Millstone Dairy Farm
David Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625-2.197
704-876-0396
This plan has been developed by:
John Stevenson D
Iredell SWCD
444 Bristol Drive jug 19
Statesville, NC 28677-29
704-$7 -6761 NC
DW[1-
eveloper Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
L
-�
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
. a---- �
Technical Specialist Signature Date UN 10 2009
RECEIVED / DENR 1 DWp
Aquifer Protection Sermon
JUN 12 2009
WF,SHINGIQ�1 Rt.G10`iALCFFICE
REC �E�r
AOUIFFR-PPnTFr,TInN SFCTIQN
JUN 0 8 2009
�
;j--------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
4. J Preview Database Version 3,1 Date Printed: 05-11-2006 Cover Page 1

1
C,
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan forfFi�1 operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres ofcrop needed to use
the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper timing -of applications to
maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity
of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides
for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
M
Soil series
Total
Acres
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nrmient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Comm.
Fert
Nutrient
Applied
(lbs/A)
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applie.
Methal
Manure
PA
NutrientA
pplied
(lbs/A)
Liquid
ManumA
ppliod
(aat)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre}
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N .
N
1000
VWA
Tons
low gals
tons
210
1
U2
Ceeit
14.00
10.00
Fescue Pasture
4.3 Tons
811-7131
*133
0
0
Broad.
t33
0,00
30.93
0.00
309.3
210
2
U2
Lloyd
15.00
10.00
Fescue Paswre
4.6 Tons
811-7/3)
*142
0
0
Broad.
142
0.00
3102
0.00
330.23
210
3
Ul
Lloyd
50.00
50.00
Fescut Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131
0186
0
0
Broad.
93
14.29
0.00
714.28
0.00
212
1
Ul
Cecil
39.00
39.00
Fescue Hay
4.6 Tons
811-7131*203
0
0
Broad.
203
31.18
0.00
1,216.11
.001
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
1,930.3
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
1,059-8
.
Balance, 1000 gallons
-870.5
Total Applied, tons639.53
Total Produced, tons
IN=
206.70
Balance, tons
Imm432.$3
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symboi * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 5/11/2006 WUT Page Page 1 of 1

Conservation Plan Map
Customer(s): J NORMAN RIDDLE
District: IREDELL SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Eleld Offlce. STATESVILLE SERVICE CENTER
Assisted By: John Stevenson
State and County: NC, IREDELL
IREDELL
SQL A R
unman
DISTRICT
Legend
Tract BoundaHes
J_Norman_Riddle---riddj n-Consplan
— Roads
35Q 0 350 Toa 1050 1400
Feat
A

0
a

I#
} : - Divislon of Water Quality:
i« acuity Number _ . - d Division of Soil and,Water,Conservation ;
Q:Other•Agency ;
r
Type of Visit: WCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: g Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up 0 Referral Q Emergency Q Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit:( Arrival Time: aDeparture Time: a ,.,- County: Region:
Farm Name: T " VIA'r Owner Email:
Owner Name: t" `i- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator: —
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: r (�
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine � -
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design,' � Current - Design 'Current r Design Current
Capacity -;,. Pop -Wet Poultry Capacity Pap. Cattle _ Capacity
x. .
Layer
=4:I INon-Layer
DisignCurrent:
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
k:_ Turkeys
[Murkey Poults
Other
Mal "9119OR
--
r
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Q Yes 1>co] NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yeso A ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes C] NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/412011 Continued
1

Facility Number. - Date of Inspection: r
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes�<oA ❑ NE
V
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes []No A ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures tack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes:��o NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [] Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside.of Approved Area
12, CropType(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?loes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
�Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes "allo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes-Z�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
ease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. TM;Z�
Ye NA F]NE
�Uaste Application eekly Freeboardste Analysis oil Anal sis Waste T cfprc Code
E],KainfalieStockingCrop Yield0 Minute Inspections onthlyand I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes,q ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. I.f selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ Noi E]NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2011 Continued

Facifi Number: - Date of Inspection:
j 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No []NA ❑NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No �A [:] NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
❑ FaiIure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose
and report mortality rates that were higl
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of e_merQeney situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-an)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
A ❑ NE
❑ Yes1�[3 NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye�?<N,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Ye ❑ NA
❑ Yes C]NA
❑ Ye o ❑ NA
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any -other comments.
Use drawines of facilitv'to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
LS:) —Ac,
'Ej2z
ReviewerAnspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2011
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE

1
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 40 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 10W1 2AU Arrival Time: Departure Time: O :$ _ _ County: Region: t/V�
t
Farm Name: V _ ��2�,• d,� �j%� Owner Email:
Owner Name:,) t I �U �` V�' � � Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: 1_1\ R) - Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: - Longitude:
Dischar¢es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?] Yes []No NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [] NorKM ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA [] NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yesb<o---(:] NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 2/4/1011 Continued

Facili Number: I Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yeso NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structu 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. ke there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Ye5 �V_o
i
❑ Ye ►No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4.6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes do
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
0 Yes�o
❑ NA
E] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
estgn a ents
❑Other:
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes *>�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes) a
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there,'evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes'�13<
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN' ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
i -n
isO&So NA NE
_rYes �<o ■NA■NE
■ - ■ No■NA■MA
E] Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facilityfail t e the
o have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes jRygo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
estgn a ents
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
aste Application 04Keelkly Freeboard aste AnalysisJ:� A�oil Analysis
❑ Yes o
ste Transfers
❑ NA ❑ NE
E3 eather Code
Mnfallocking op Yield 20 Minute Inspections n ly and 1" Rainfall Inspectionsudge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes *>�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes �fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

l acility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes jj:Ll�o 0 NA 0 NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes J?�;4o 0 NA 0 NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
[:] f=ailure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliancc:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yeso
NA
E] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[] Yes o
�] NA
E] NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose ofdaad-iiaima With 24 hours and/or document
Yes o
0 NA
[:] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[] Yes Bio
[] NA
ONE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency s' as required by the
Yes )E IQo
0 NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-ap a ion
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes �o
[:] NA
NE
Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
E] Yes_ o
0 NA
0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
Yes �o
0 NA
0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes No
0 NA
0 NE
--
Comment(ref;to question #) .plain any4YES answers'and/nr eny additional recommendattons.or ariy other.commehts I ,�
1Tse drnwinve�nffacility tn.hatter.'exnlnin'.aituatinnc.(nse additional naves as;necesgarvl. i. a r, ,.w, �• .... 3: ". v �.. ..
SV-T�'J� vAvk**,/
G Lit ✓\_ ,�S ►
�a \JAI C
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
(j�Cyk7tl,,:zF_,Q
Phone:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/412011

,-c-�� m, � fir• �,;p�.�...w,
ate ryQuality :.X'
il4and�Water Conservation '.����
T �<.
type of visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
teason for Visit ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: c7 !2 Arrival Time: d! _ . Departure Time: I OPL'. County: ` Region: y" lkD
Farm Name: l,s#--� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
t 1 `` �`"� �— Operator Certification Number: 2 � .
Certified Operator:
r
Back-up Operator: Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ❑ o Longitude: ❑
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population .Wet Poultry Capacity Population
10 Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other,
❑ Other
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑
Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poulis
❑ Other
Design, Current
Cattle Capacity Population
ai Cow
�'7t� 1Jpai
Calf
t is 11ai
Heifet
ID
D S
Cow
`-itl
Non -Dai
❑ Yes
❑ Beef Stocker
NA
0 -Beef Feeder
❑ Yes
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
I
Number of Structures: ft]
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �do ❑ NA FINE
❑ Yes
❑ No 6qNA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No UTA
❑ NE
[:]No
NE
❑ Yes
❑ YesNo
NA
ElNE
❑ Yes
u o ❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

P,
Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? El Yes El NA El NE
r a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No�A ❑ NE
r� Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: GN' —�
Spillway?:'�
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 7
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes b;p ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental thscat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?❑yes �o [I NA El NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) �,.�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No [INA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? v
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �no ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 18;�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ ppli cation Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
11. Soil type(s) C C e
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? a, _ , .� 015� s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? d d'vr, ❑ Yes LNej ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wetta cre determination i❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Ye El NA ElNE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 - 7 :/Z) E D__Z
C=
CO702 12 �� -j:�A
Reviewerlinspector Name Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

i
'Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ecistsesign Maps LjOther
21. Does re rd keeping need improvement? If yes, check he appropriate box below, ❑ Yes ,,---,, off�❑ NA ❑ NE
ante Application eekly Freeboar�ste Analysis oil Analysis aste Transfers Id'Annual Certification
fall ❑Kocking Cye�p Yield inute Inspections onthly and I"Rain Inspections Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 1 SX0 ❑ NA, ❑ NE
or
23. If selected did the facilityfail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
g[:1 Yes ❑ No JEJ�NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? LEI ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 12MA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes -,Mo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWA4P?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of d animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer e�ncy�situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
❑ Yes *o
❑ Yes KO
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes JjjNo
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
6 -` s 3 • _y'" ,'kiA" .-� a.st? x a �"� �' rpr� :� LZ?g v" +
A x h !and/6
Aldltioua!}Comnrrents andlor Drawings a .� gz, t „° A,. t i����
4
ell
12/28104

Facjltly Nu'mbetr�
, .'-Oivfsion of Water QuaLty
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency n <
Type of Visit * Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ID Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow tip 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
�f
Date of Visit: L Arrival Time: 104 :r Departure Time: O tQ-'HCl. County: Region:
Farm Name: �V " ' Z� _ _N _'_ ' - / Owner Email:
Owner Name: . _ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: j Integrator:
Certified Operator: _ _ t±--►_ *�"` __ _. � Operator Certification Number:2��s�_
Back-up Operator: Back -u Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
El Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
El Farrow to Finish
El Gilts
[I Boars
Other,
❑ Other
p
Latitude: =0
Q Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Wet Pouitry Cilpacity Population Cattle Capacity P
El La er
ElNon-La ei
Dry Poultry
Non -
Poults
Cow
CalfHeifer
FDry
❑ Yes
❑ NoElNE
Cow
0
❑ Non -Dai
C3No
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ NE
❑ Beef Feeder
JET Beef Brood Cow
Number of Structures: M
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes10� NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued
❑ Yes
❑ NoElNE
t
ElYes
C3No
❑ NE
A
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes,,
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —
Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?: Lam'
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
r
❑ YeV NA ❑ NE
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes No❑ NA ElNE
❑Ye o ❑NA [:1 NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental a , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o [:]NA El NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
El o [3NA [3 NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes C'MD ❑ NA ❑ NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ej'� NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drifl Appli an�o�njutside of Area
12. Crop e sQ�
13. Soil type(s)
or
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
t5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? �4s ElNA C1 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination',[] Yes7 ElNA ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El �[:INA
[:1NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? El Yes ❑ NE
VVV
Reviewer/InspectorName
f , �• Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12/28/04 Continued

.i
Facility Number: -- Date of Inspection 0
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Ye No ❑ NA [__1 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box.EtWUF-07hecFists Design a ther
21. Does record keeping need im ment? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes, � A ❑ NE
aste plication Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis aste Transfers Annual Certification
P Y Y Y
L_T
Rainfall ocking op Yield ❑ 1 inute Inspection Monthly and 1" Rain Insp ' ns her Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ N A ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA' ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No�<E] NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWN4P? ❑ Yes Flo NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document [] yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher -than ormal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emer situations as required by ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yeso . A El
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Ailditiooal C&n euts and/or Drawings
12/28104
12/28104

I'
Division of Water Quality
Facility Nttml7et• 2 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit @ Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance•
Reason for Visit *Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Deferral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or visit: LO Arrival Time: Ot ,00Pr_^ • Departure Time, = County: Regiorr kb_._,,.,
Farm Dame: �' V 1� _ , ., _ fit _ _ Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address: _
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: __.Title: _ _. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:_ Integrator:
Certified Operator: ^� r �1 -"___4 —,-^_ Operator Certification N umber:
Back-up Operator: _�•___._� Back-up Certification Dumber:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Population
[❑ Wean to Finish _
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Latitude: =0
=&
= Longitude: =0=-
°=- ❑ `i
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La ei
Dry Poultry
❑
Layers
❑
Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
S*tle Capacity Pc,Pu�tion
I:—
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Numhei•of Structures:
. d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. 1s there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? .
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes e5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No A ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No EINE
❑ Yes o ElNA ❑ NE'
El *c, El NA EINE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection &Treatment
4/Is Xrage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'?
./
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard'?
Struct re I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
r Identifier: _UC
L.:.i -- inn _. •
5pilllvay?:
DesignFreeb (in):
Observed Freebu (in):
4
1k
19
❑Y � o 0 N C1 NE
❑ Yes ❑ No� NE
Structure 5 Struc ure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 1;2y ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed ❑ Yesoq No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme al thre , tify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes :E3
A ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ y A NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement? �,
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El yes u NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN. ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
e 13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?s ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
15, hoes the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ NA ❑ NF
t6. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination%❑ yes No A ❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IT5qo ❑.I'vA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of proper y operat►ng waste app Hca ion equipmen }� E -
ii �."i,`�,�.:,vS�eroe ,�'t���,.-''�'}
Comments (refer,to•que'shon - Explain any°YFS answers andfor.�any recommendation or aay other comments ".Qs
Y;-:t«'�'•.c tr,..a...,-t F: ° .,v�� . �.;....u. s;�•it-, k „� �Mt.Y�j�R dii. r
Ilse drawings of `facility to better'explain sttbattons.-(use additional pages as:necessary). r�� + �, �,,> �'�s '. • �� r � t�k��
as .f. e + i°i3r L r fi M
11
.;-� ac�'.h, �r : �? 9°r'v�:' ak,..-%»:�i�i:', ,�' �, 6;� •,> ' � k.,rt::.t;,.�, �k r���.
Wk17-
Reviewer/Inspector Name phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128/04 Continued

Facility Number, — ! Date of Inspection ,J
Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [] Yes NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWNIP readily available'? lfyes, check ❑ Yes
e n NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. �s s esign /laps ether
21. Does record keeping need impro ment? If yes, the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ N ❑ NA ❑ NE
rc%ste Application eekly Freeboard ❑ W to Analysis oil Analy ' rite Transfers nnua] Certification
Crop Yield Lj 120 ivhnnte Inspections
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ NE
23,
if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain ralnbreakers on irrigationquipment?
El Yes No
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as requiermit? �
Ye
❑ NE
25.
Did the facilityfail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the per
❑ Yes o❑
NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility tail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) c
❑ Yes ❑ No )KI�A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAVN
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31, Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of ep�erne ,>>��at�nn� as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative)
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
P? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yes _"<1
" ❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ NA
❑ Yeso NA
❑ Yes NA
1161 ai toinmll iits a'n[l).or,,DrawIngs:_..
r - .MUM►� �f
12/28104
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
D NE
❑ NE
NE
'•'�` �

A7iA.
M
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
671 Pisgah Church Road
Stony Point, NC 28678
Dear Mr. Riddle:
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 10, 2009
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2009-PC-0972
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Millstone Dairy Farm/Facility 49-27
General Permit AWC490027
Iredell County
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection. Report for the inspection conducted
on November 25, 2009, by James B, Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the
inspection, the following violation(s) were identified:
e Waste applied to fields not included in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP) in Fall, 2008. This is a violation of General Permit Condition 11.2, and the
CAWMP.
e Facility Operators failed to notify the Division of Water Quality of emergency situations
(inadequate storage capacity in the Storage Pond) as required by Permit. At the time of
the inspection, waste was observed to be into the Freeboard. Failure to notify DWQ is a
violation of General Permit Condition 111. 13, and the CAWMP.
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by December 21, 2009,
indicating the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future.
In responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
Division of Water Quality /Aquifer Protection Section/ Mooresville Regional office 'jJ'fle
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N orthCarolitia
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
tntemet: www,ncwaterquality.org N%'tirally
An Equal Opporivnity 4 ARrmalive Action Employer v U

f
Millstone Dairy Farm[Facility 49-27
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
December 10, 2009
page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Beane at [phone].
Since ely, ff ,
f
Andrew H. Pitner,
P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosure: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated November 25, 2009
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Fredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Central Permit File AWC490027
Regional Permit File AWC490027
jb

Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4 027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AVIC490027 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliancp,Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Lgtelf Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 11/25/2009 _ Entry Time:03:30 PM� Exit Time: 05:00 PM
Farm Name: Millstone Dairy Farm
Owner: J N rm n i
Incident #E:
Owner Email: ,stickwolfd)msn.com
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: §71 Pisgah Church Rd _ _ Stony Point NQ 28678
Physical Address: 1163 Snow Creek Rd Stony Po+nt NC 28678
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°54'40" Longitude: $0'52'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right Genereal
location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi, north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment W' Waste Application
Records and Documents other Issues
Certified Operator: David N Riddle Operator Certification Number: 21434
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
On-site representative David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beall e Phone: [phone]
Ext.2162
Inspector Signature: Date: xt.216
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date: 1112512009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason For Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
06/12/09 n Waste Analysis > N = 7.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
01/30/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.9 Lbs11000 Gallons
04102109 > Soil Analysis
4. Facility Operator advised to pump down Storage Pond ASAP?
14. Waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP, NOV to follow.
14. Waste applied to fields/crops not included in the CAWMP by Registered Manure Hauler AWH490002 as per third party
agreement. Associated waste application records reviewed following the inspection.
24. Calibration of waste application equipment to be scheduled prior to next application event.
31. Failure to notify DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit; NOV to follow.
jb
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 4911027
Inspection Date: 11/25/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Dairy Calf 15 12
Cattle -Dairy Heifer 60 30
Q Cattle - Dry Caw 40 20
Cattie - Milk Caw 170 150
Total Design Capacity: 285
Total SSLW: 359,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kaste Pond WSP 18.00L- 15.D0
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date: 11/2512009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts - Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ D
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other n
.a. Was conveyance man-made? n n ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) Cl ❑ ■ Cl
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
n
■ n
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
■
❑
❑ n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
Q ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0
■
n Cl
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
I] ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, 2n, etc)? ❑
Page: 4
•

i
Permit: AVVC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 11/25/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? n
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? n
Outside of acceptable crop window? n
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? n
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Scil Type 6
14 Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Timothy, Orchard, 8
Rye Grass
■nCl0
❑ ■ ❑ 0
p■n❑
Page: 5

Page:6
t
Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility
Number: 490027
Inspection hate: 11125/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
Q
MOD
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
0
120 Minute inspections?
0
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
r!
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
0
22: Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■ n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n ■ n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n n n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
0
n ■ Q
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
r1
■ Cl n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
0
0 ■ n
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAMP?
n
■ n n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and repert those
0
■ n n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
.0
■ ❑ rl
Quality representative immediately.
Page:6

Permit: AWC490027 Owner -Facility: J Norman Riddle
Inspection Date: 11/2512009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 490027
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
■n❑n
n■nn
0■nn
Page: 7

Be lie,`James
From: Propst, Jim - Statesville, NC [e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 7:29 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: RE: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
James,
I assisted David Riddle Thursday in filling out his forms.
Thanks,
Jim Propst
Iredell FO
From: Bealle, James[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:43 PM
To: Summers, James - Statesville, NC; Propst, Jim - Statesville, NC
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: FW: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
Jim/Jim
Have either of you heard from Mr. Riddle recently regarding his POA?
jb
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
.lames Bealle <iames.beallegncdenr.gov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:18 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: RE: NOV number 2009-PC-0972.....Mil[stone Dairy farm 49-27
David,
We appreciate your response to the NOV dated December 10, 2009. However, the attached POA forms must be
completed (in addition to your written response) to regain compliance at your Facility. Iredell SWCD and
NRCS personnel are available to provide technical assistance, on this and many other issues.
Please contact me @ [phone] should you require any additional information.
ib

a
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
.lames Bealle <james.beallegncdenr.gov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
From: david riddle [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent. Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: NOV number 2009-PC=0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
In regard to the NOV.... titled "waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP".... I will make sure to
always have a waste analysis from this day forward.
As for the "failure to notify DWQ about an "emergency situation" ... Had no clue i was suppose to do
this sinced have been told FOR YEARS, by various inspectors, I had 18 more inches OVER the marker....
So therefore I did not regard it as an "emergency situation". I now know the rules and will not make that
mistake again......... As far as the "plan of action"_ I'm a farmer NOT an engineer... so my plan of action
is SIMPLE.... I will pump it out as soon as the weather clears. Arrangements have been made
with another party. That is my "POA" As for the forms you sent I have NO CLUE how to do this stuff
or exactly what it is you are looking for and really don't have any idea of its significance. You guys audit
my records once a year and soil and water does it once a year. You probably know this needed info
better than I. I realize that I am over the "marker"..- I also realize if I'm reading right that I have 18
inches in my spillway, and Mr Bealle ESTIMATED 15... so all this is over 3 inches, So I still have room.
Again nobody is more concerned than we are about this. We even have gone an alternate route to find
SOMEONE else to complete it for us which will cost us alot of money...... But it will be done. As for this
form again, I have no clue OVER MY HEAD, SORRY. Any questions 704-880-7335.... Thanks
DR
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.

99
PLAWOF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 9f - Z ~7 County: =::;T/1 ea1e-
Facility Name: '//57�0.� I �¢4�'Q s4 4e
Certified Operator Name: T—) d4 4..' h Al r0 O/C
Operator #
V Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 S
Lagoon Name/Identifier (ID): AL5P
Spillway (Yes or No): ;y/fS
1' art
Level (inches): --
M
2. Check all applicable items
u
rj
FED 1 1 2*
r
L/ Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level ,is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable. range.
l/ Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
A
Operation will be_partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation-
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levers and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: -Tev.1S �' fS AeY eAwedSl�
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Phone: 7L2 Y -P " 73��S-
Facnity.OwnerlManager (print}
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
f PoA Cover Page 2/21/00f
Date:

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FC
THIRTY (3(
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 0inches
c
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 1 inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = NO 7-) 1V inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48alb lons _
12 ft
3 3 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period {
f, temporary storage period according to structural design days { _
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design/10�S--ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design 2j93 -Z- ft3
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 3i6 7f ft'
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30_ days = C7 sgallons
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated P -T -T3 lb/1000 gal.
m. (lines e + k) x line I = Ib PAN
1000
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON S1 TE
- II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YRJ24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 1

C-
r 1. structure ID- 2 %
t , 2. structure ID: I 1
i 4#
'--� 3. �st�ructdreglY r � • i -
4. -structure ID:...
5. structure ID:
6. structure ID:
line.m = PAN 1
line m = lb PAN
fine m,..= Ib PAN
line m = Ib PAN
line m = Ib PAN
line m = Ib PAN
n. lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6 = Ib PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIES DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field # q. crop i r. acres
s. remaining t. TOTAL PAN
IRR -2 PAN BALANCE
balance FOR FIELD
(Iblacre) (lbs.)
column r x s
u.
application
window'
t S vi 6I
Z
A
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) _ 69 ---Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 2 `
T�

•w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) W Ib. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a,deficit. - If line y does not show as -a deficit, list -course of -action -here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields'are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
�-•-� %� � �� i , i�. '`� �' J� �'� � 1� ,'.� 1 1" "ter �� � -�•. .�/ � .r�u � Q C% '!i
•fji fI is
F r
Yl � � l` rL �' Q ;`✓'t_� ]-f �' _��+t }_ ! � F_ �_��
,
ayr-�_^ � �,j,..{ �,`,� .r '+ ifJ �:.
AJ /1
Rpt j i' l � s , `f r ; + r� � , r�� � k k -. l
�•i �1 � � ' 4) 't G/
' �. 1w ' , j.�' ;',� ;•j � � � �',,1. �i , t
5 ' � L+ its J ��Ar"' +Y+YYihi," f r G-
,
•r
II
v
r`�j `-� T__
IV C It � � �'`�e n,
OL
q �l
POA (30 Day) 2121!00; ,/� ; ;,; f: ,r+ , �" 3.
; ; _T ­V1 �� f .74, . ,? ;,' , •,�

1 ; PLAN OF ACTION (POA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT AN IMA
FIVE (5) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD ''
% FEB eta
a, 1. TOTAL VOLUME TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE NC FNR MRC
DWQ _ Aquifer ProtE
1 Structure Namelldentifi r Ir • �- Z
1171
JN������
2. Current liquid volume in structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed structural freeboard zone _t_ / r inches
(Normally 12 inches or greater)
c.--li#e-b—tfhe
a (inches within structural freeboard) =
inches
d.
top of dike surface area according to design
1k60Z ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevatioh
e.
line c x line d x 7.48ag Ilons -
'�' 3 �t gallons
12. ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f.
temporary storage period according to structural design
:SCS days
g.
volume.of waste produced according to structural design
10ft3
h.
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
10(o $7FS ft3
certified herd #
i.
volume of.wash water according to structural design
1 2 O 3 2 ft3
_
j.
excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
34 6 ft3
l
k.
(lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 5. _ _days =
05 gallons
line f
y 4. Total
volume of waste to be land applied during 5 day draw down
I.
total volume to be land applied line e + line k
gallons
REPEAT SECTION'1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE. WITH A LIQUID LEVEL WITHIN
THE STRUCTURAL. FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
II. TOTAL VOLUME OF WASTE STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD ELEVATIONS
FOR BALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (5 Day) 2121100 1
i

1. structure ID:
2. structure IDS
structwue llD
4. structure ID:
5. structure ID:
6. structure ID:
s
n, lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6 =
o. line n —
27,154 ..
` C
r �
r �
line l = 2 7 gallons '
line I = gallons \
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
line I = gallons
line l = gallons
-211 1_ gallons
v O acre -inches
III. TOTAL ACRES AVAILABLE TO RECEIVE WASTE DURING 5 DAY DRAW. DOWN PERIOD 1,2
1 While thisi•section deals with hydraulic loading capacities, applications cannot exceed
agronomic rate for receiving crop according to its certified waste plan
2 Fields with no remaining PAN balance, no receiving crop, and./or completely saturated are
not considered available to receive waste -
p. tract #
q. field # j r,. soil type s. crop t. acres
u. remaining V. maximum
IRR -2 PAN application
balance rate (in/hr)
(lb/acre)
W. maximum
application
amount
(inches
-Z
Ceti, I A 5 Tc,�e
zly
-71 7j+� ToK& /,5--
!2-
/
7 Z
1 mss[uc l &
D
x. total acres available during 5 day draw down (sum of column t) _ �J acres
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL HYDRAULIC LOAD TO BE LAND APPLIED PER ACRE
Y. line o = _ 7, inches per acre to be applied within 5 days
line x `
PoA (5 Day) 2121100 2

Y
If unable to land apply hydraulic load listed in line y, list course of action here including pump
and haul, depopulation, herd.reduction, etc. For pump &'haul and herd reduction'©ptions,
recalculate new hydraulic load based on new information.
Plan to land apply hydraulic load:
1. Describe moisture conditions of fields? (e.g./ Is there water standing in ,field; does irrigation
equipment mar down in field; "trafficability" across soils; will soils absorb application without runoff ,
etc.)
S j41,4ti.W �4 A.f wXs
2. Date and amount of last rainfall event?
3. Dates of last waste application event per field `r
4. Given optimum soil and weather conditions, is irrigation', -equipment capable of -applying the .
volume in line "n" at appropriate seasonal. (i.e. winter) application rates.within five days?
5. Irrigation schedule for next 5 days - include daily schedule; proposed application rates and
amounts per irrigation event; changes made in gun sizes, nozzles, "o" rings, operating time, travel
speed, etc. to meet proposed changes in application rates and amounts; and any other information
for consideration
�S
V Do
--
r 5
r-
1,
POA (5 Day) 2/21100 3

Bealle, James
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 3:43 PM
To: '[e-mail]; '[e-mail]'
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: FW: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
Attachments: HighFreeboardPOA_CoverLetter[1].doc; HighFreeboardPOA30DAY[1].doc
Jim/Jim:
Have either of you heard from Mr. Riddle recently regarding his POA?
�i
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Lav and may be disclosed to third parties,
James Bealle <iames.beal.le it ncdenr.gov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(M.RO)/DWQ/APS
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:18 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: RB: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
David,
We appreciate your response to the NOV dated December 10, 2009. However, the attached POA forms must be
completed (in addition to your written response) to regain compliance at your Facility. Iredell SWCD and
NRCS personnel are available to provide technical assistance, on this and many other issues.
Please contact me @ [phone] should you require any additional information.
jb
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist
N CDENR(M RO)/D W Q/APS
From: david riddle [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:18 AM f
To: Bealle, James
Subject: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27

In regard to the NOV.... titled "waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP",,.. I will make sure to
always have a waste analysis from this day forward,
As for the "failure to notify DWQ about an "emergency situation" ,.. Had no clue i was suppose to do
this since I have been told FOR YEARS, by various inspectors, I had 18 more inches OVER the marker....
So therefore I did not regard it as an "emergency situation". I now know the rules and will not make that
mistake again......... As far as the "plan of action"... I'm a farmer NOT an engineer... so my plan of action
is SIMPLE.... I will pump it out as soon as the weather clears. Arrangements have been made
with another party. That is my "POA" As for the forms you sent I have NO CLUE how to do this stuff
or exactly what it is you are looking for and really don't have any idea of its significance. You guys audit
my records once a year and soil and water does it once a year. You probably know this needed info
better than I. I realize that I am over the "marker".... I also realize if I'm reading right that I have I8
inches in my spillway, and Mr Bealle ESTIMATED 15... so all this is over 3 inches. So I still have room.
Again nobody is more concerned than we are about this. We even have gone an alternate route to find
SOMEONE else to complete it for us which will cost us alot of money,..... But it will be done. As for this
form again, I have no clue OVER MY HEAD, SORRY. Any questions 704-880-7335.... Thanks
Hotmail; Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it ngw.

Bealle; James
From: david riddle [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:12 PM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: RE: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
OK The pond has been emptied to 10 inches UNDER the marker. Just as I promised But if somebody
wants to come and help me fill out some forms about a pond that is not over the marker I'm all for it. Just
let me know. 704-880-7335 Thanks
90
From: [e-mail]
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:18:28 -0500
Subject: RE: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
David,
We appreciate your response to the NOV dated December 10, 2009. However, the attached POA forms
must be completed (in addition to your written response) to regain compliance at your Facility. Iredell
SWCD and NRCS personnel are available to provide technical assistance, on this and many other issues.
Please contact me @ [phone] should you require any additional information.
jb
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <iames.bealle(&ncdenr.gov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
From: david riddle [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
In regard to the NOV.... titled "waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP I will make sure to
always have a waste analysis from this day forward.
As for the "failure to notify DWQ about an "emergency situation" ... Had no clue i was suppose to do
this since I have been told FOR YEARS, by various inspectors, I had 18 more inches OVER the marker....
So therefore I did not regard it as an "emergency situation". I now know the rules and will not make that
mistake again......... As far as the "plan of action"... I'm a farmer NOT an engineer.., so my plan of action
is SIMPLE.... I will pump it out as soon as the weather clears. Arrangements have been made
with another party. That is my "POA" As for the forms you sent I have NO CLUE how to do this stuff
or exactly what it is you are looking for and really don't have any idea of its significance. You guys audit
my records once a year and soil and water does it once a year. You probably know this needed info
better than I. I realize that'I am over the "marker I also realize if I'm reading right that I have 18

inches in my spillway, and Mr Bealle ESTIMATED 15... so all this is over 3 inches. So I still have room:
Again nobody is more concerned than we are about this. We even have gone an alternate route to find
SOMEONE else to complete it for us which will cost us aiot of money...... But it will be done. As for this
Form again, I have no clue OVER MY HEAD, SORRY. Any questions 704-884-7335.... Thanks
*;
Hotmail; Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
Your E-mail and More On -the -Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sian up now.

..'Bealle; James
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:18 PM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: RE: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
Attachments: HighFreeboardPOA_CoverLetter[1].doc; High FreeboardPOA30DAY[1],doc
David,
We appreciate your response to the NOV dated December 10, 2009. However, the attached POA forms must be
completed (in addition to your written response) to regain compliance at your Facility. Iredell SWCD and
NRCS personnel are available to provide technical assistance, on this and many other issues.
Please contact me @ [phone] should you require any additional information.
ib
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <[e-mail]>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
From: david riddle [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
In regard to the NOV.— titled "waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP".... I will make sure to
always have a waste analysis from this day forward.
As for the "failure to notify DWQ about an "emergency situation" ... Had no clue i was suppose to do
this since I have been told FOR YEARS, by various inspectors, I had 18 more inches OVER the marker....
So therefore I did not regard it as an "emergency situation". I now know the rules and will not make that
mistake again......... As far as the "plan of action"... I'm a farmer NOT an engineer... so my plan of action
is SIMPLE.... I will pump it out as soon as the weather clears. Arrangements have been made
with another party. That is my "POA" As for the forms you sent I have NO CLUE how to do this stuff
or exactly what it is you are looking for and really don't have any idea of its significance. You guys audit
my records once a year and soil and water does it once a year. You probably know this needed info
better than I. I realize that I am over the "marker".... I also realize if I'm reading right that I have 18
inches in my spillway, and Mr Bealle ESTIMATED 15... so all this is over 3 inches. So I still have room.
Again nobody is more concerned than we are about this. We even have gone an alternate route to find
SOMEONE else to complete it for us which will cost us alot of money....... But it will be done. As for this
form again, I have no clue OVER MY HEAD, SORRY. Any questions 704-880-7335.... Thanks
go
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number:
Facility Name:
Certified Operator Name:
County:
Operator #
Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway fdr lagoons with spillways.
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Lagoon Name/identifier (ID):
Spillway (Yes or No):
Level (inches):
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures. Five
and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are within
acceptable ranges.
Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A 30 day
Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Volume and PAN content of waste to
pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list of the
proposed sites with related facility number(s), number acres and receiving crop information.
Contact and secure approval from the Division of Water Quality prior to transfer of waste
to a site not covered in the facility's certified animal waste management plan.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
- attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates for depopulation
- if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste:
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the attached Plan
of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the information is accurate and correct.
Phone:
Facility Owner/Manager (print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
PoA Cover Page 2121100

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
• THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID):
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr, storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design ft2
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. line c x line d x 7.48alg ilon_s - gallons
12 ft
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design days
g, volume of waste produced according to structural design ft3
h. actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i +i) x 7.48 x 30_ days =
line f
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated
m. (lines e + k) x line I =
1000
ft3
ft3
ft3
_._. gallons
Ib/1000 gal.
lb PAN
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
il. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
PoA (30 Day) 2121100 . 1

1.
structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN ,
2.
structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN.
3.
structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
5.
structure ID:
line m =
Ib PAN
6.
structure 1D:
line m =
Ib PAN
n.
lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6 =
Ib PAN
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAYDRAW DOWN
PERIOD.
DO
NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN
NOT BE
APPLIES DURING THIS
30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop r. acres
s. remaining L TOTAL PAN
IRR -2 PAN BALANCE
balance FOR FIELD
(Ib/acre) (lbs.)
column r x s
U.
application
window'
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available receiving
crops during 30 day drawn down period
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = Ib. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100 2

yv, Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = Ib. PAN
x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = Ib. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted
facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the .
receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PoA (30 Day) .2121100 3

Bealle; James
From: Bealle, James
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:53 AM
To: Pitner, Andrew
Subject: FW: NOV number 2009 -PC -0972..... Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
Andrew,
Speaking of POA's, we should probably discuss this one...
ib
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
James Bealle <iames.beal1e &ncdenr.Rov>
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR(MRO)/DWQ/APS
From: david riddle [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: NOV number 2009-PC-0972.....Millstone Dairy farm 49-27
In regard to the NOV.... titled "waste applied to fields not included in the CAWMP".... I will make sure to
always have a waste analysis from this day forward.
As for the "failure to notify DWQ about an "emergency situation" ... Had no clue i was suppose to do
this since I have been told FOR YEARS, by various inspectors, I had 18 more inches OVER the marker....
So therefore I did not regard it as an "emergency situation". I now know the rules and will not make that
mistake again......... As far as the "plan of action"... I'm a farmer NOT an engineer... so my plan of action
is SIMPLE.... I will pump it out as soon as the weather clears. Arrangements have been made
with another party. That is my "POA" As for the forms you sent I have NO CLUE how to do this stuff
or exactly what it is you are looking for and really don't have any idea of its significance. You guys audit
my records once a year and soil and water does it once a year. You probably know this needed info
better than I. I realize that I am over the "marker".... I also realize if I'm reading right that I have 18
incises in my spillway, and Mr Bealle ESTIMATED 1S... so all this is over 3 inches. So I still have room.
Again nobody is more concerned than we are about this. We even have gone an alternate route to find
SOMEONE else to complete it for us which will cost us slot of money...... But it will be done. As for this
form again, I have no clue OVER MY HEAD, SORRY. Any questions 704-880-7335.... Thanks
EM
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.

Bealle, James
From: david riddle [[e-mail]]
Sent. Monday, December 07, 2009 11:39 AM
To: Bealle, James
Subject: waster records for Millstone Dairy
In September 2008 we got Doug Bess to haul out with wayne Roberstons truck...... He carried it to his
land and applied it on his bean field..... I did not get a waste Analysis it turns out since he was going to
his leased land.. Had to confer with my brother to see since it was over a year ago. Write me up .
whatever you have to do... Got my own feelings about some of this stuff, but will keep them to myself.
Have a great day... Hope this clears it up and you know the address to send the NOV. Have a great day
DR
Windows Live Hotmail gives you a free,exclusive gift. Click here to download.

ft
❑ Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490,027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490027 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Operations Review Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Iredell Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 09/26/200a---- Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: 03:05 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Millstone i Farm Owner Email: stickwolf(amsn.com
Owner: J Norman Riddle Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 671 Pisgah Church R Stony Point NC 266789230
Physical Address: 1163 Snow Creek Rd Stony Point NC 28678
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35"54'40" Longitude: 80"52'00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right Genereal
location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi, north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: David N Riddle
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues Technical Assistance
Operator Certification Number: 21434
On -Site Rep rase ntative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David Riddle Phone:
On-site representative David Riddle Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Hudyncia Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Calibration: done on 3/14/2007 (Wayne Robertson's slurry tank) .
Date:
Soils: taken in early September, awaiting results. Check next visit.
a��Analysis: taken in early September, awaiting results.
Waste application records will be completed when waste sample results are sent back from Raleigh. Check fall 2008 waste
application records next visit,
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 09126/2008' Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 120
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�aste Pond WSP 18.00
Page: 2
0
In

Permit: AWC490027 Owner • Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 09/25/2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review Roason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
■
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Dees discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
■
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
vas
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l,e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Q
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
❑
Meavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 09!2612008 Inspection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? In
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Fescue (Hay)
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Lloyd
Cecil
❑■❑❑
❑ Cl ■ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
n■❑❑
n■n❑
❑B
Page: 4

s
a
Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date: 09/26/2008 Inspection Type: Operations Review
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Farm (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
❑
■
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑.
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
0
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ In ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490027
Pate: 09/26!2008
Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Inspection Type. Operations Review
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWq of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 490027
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

OF WArFRMichael F. Easley, Governor
0. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
co (& r-
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
H FILE
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
June 5, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone: Dairy Farm
671 Pisgah Church Road
Stony Point, NC 28678
Re: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2008-PC-0388
Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Millstone Dairy Farm/Facility 41-27
General Permit AWC490027
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Chapter 143 of the North Carolina General Statutes authorizes and directs the Environmental
Management Commission of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to protect and preserve the water and air resources of the State. The Division of
Water Quality has the delegated authority to enforce adopted pollution control regulations. This
letter is a standard notification and is intended to advise you of the legal requirements associated
with the operation of your Facility.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection conducted
on May 8, 2008, by Jaynes B. Bealle III, Environmental Specialist/DWQ. During the inspection,
the following violation(s) were identified:
• Facility Operator failed to conduct the required Annual Soil Analysis. This is a violation
of General Permit Condition I11.4, I11.10, and Ill. 11, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP).
Please submit a written response to the Division of Water Quality by June 20, 2008, indicating
the actions taken to correct the noted violation(s), and prevent recurrence in the future. In
responding, please reference the Facility and NOV Number. Address your comments to the
attention of Mr. Bealle at the address located on the bottom of this page.
Division of Water Quality 1 Aquifer Protection Section 1 Mooresvilte Regional Office Phone: [phone], Fax [phone] No�e
hCarolina
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 Internet: www ncwaterguality.oraQtllCl1//1�

A
Millstone Dairy Farm/Facility 49-27 rl
NOTICE OF VIOLATION C
,lune 5, 2008 `
� r ---
Page 2
Be advised that this Notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions as appropriate to regain compliance. The North Carolina General Statutes
provide for the assessment of civil penalties of up to Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000)
per day, per violation for noncompliance; and/or criminal penalties.
Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Beane at [phone].
Sincerely,
Andrew H. Pitner, P.G.
Aquifer Protection Section Regional Supervisor
enclosures: Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report dated May 8, 2008
Notification of Change of Ownership Form
cc: Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
Animal Feeding Operations Unit, Raleigh
Regional Files
ib

Division of Water Quality ,
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC490027 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cornoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: lredell __ _ _ Region. Mooresville
Date of Visit: 0 510 812 0 0 8 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Millstone Dairy Farm__ w Owner Email:
Owner: J Norman Riddle
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 671 Pisgah Church Rd Stony Point NC 28678
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 25°54'40 Longitude: 80°52`00"
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right Genereal
location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi. north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: David N Riddle Operator Certification Number: 21434
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
On-site representative David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: [phone]
Ext...1I2AA162
Inspector Signature: Date -
Secondary Inspectors
Inspection Summary:
01/30/08 > Waste Analysis > N = 1.9 Lbs/1000 Gallons
06/14/07 > Waste Analysis > N =10.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/20/06 > Soil Analysis
21. Failure to conduct Annual Soil Analysis; NOV to follow.
C
Page: 1

h
Permit: AWC490027 Owner- Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027 k
Inspection Dale: 0510812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ 0 ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure n
Application Field n
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? Cl n ■ n
In. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n ■ n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (f yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE;
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
n
Hydraulic Overload?
n
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 3

r
1
Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 05/0812008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21, Does record keeping need improvement? 2000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
■
Crop yields?
fl
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
it
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
fl
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
D
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
n
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Notification of Change of Ownership
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
In accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 2T .1304(c) and t5 NCAC 2T .1305(d) this form is official notification
to the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer of ownership of an Animal Waste Management Facility. This form
must be submitted to DWQ no later than 60 days following the transfer of ownership.
General Information:
Name of Farm: Facility No:
Previous Owner(s) Name: Phone No:_
New Owner(s) Name: Phone No:_
Mailing Address:
Farm Location: Latitude and Longitude:
County:
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road names, directions,
milepost, etc.):
Operation Description:
Type of Swine No. of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals
❑ Layer
❑ Pullets
Other Type of Livestock:
Type of Cattle
❑ Dairy
❑ Beef
No. of Animals
Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application: Required Acreage:
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds : Total Capacity: Cubic Feet (ft3)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for the farm named above
and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any modification or expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will require a permit modification before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from the storage or application system to
surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -year,
24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal waste. I (we) understand that this facility may be
covered by a State Non -Discharge Permit or a NPDES Permit and completion of this form authorizes the Division of Water
Quality to issue the required permit to the new land owner.
Name of .Previous Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of New Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
Please sign and return this form to:
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Date:
Date:
May 2, 2007

NOV Millstone Dairy Farm
s
Subject: NOV Millstone Dairy Farm
From: david riddle <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:19:52 -0400
To: <[e-mail]>
Soil samples have been collected and sent off. Hope this is sufficent. Take care
David Riddle
The I'm Talkathon starts 6/24/08. For now, give amongst yourselves. Learn More
1 of 1 6/20/2008 9:53 AM

h
Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 490027 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC420027 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Iredell _ Region: Idggresville
Date of Visit: 08/17/2007 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Millstone Dairy Farm Owner Email:
Owner: J Norman Riddle Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 671 Pisgah Church Rd Stony Point NC 28678
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°54'4Q" Longitude: 80°52'00"
From the intersection of Hwy, 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right Genereal
location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi. north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: David N Riddle Operator Certification Number: 21434
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On-site representative David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name David N. Riddle
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Beal Phone: [phone]_2t41
Inspector Signature: bate: (7z'? -'-v7
Secondary Inspector
Inspection Summary:
06/14/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 10,1 Lbs11000 Gallons
01/30/07 > Waste Analysis > N = 2.0 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/20/06 > Soil Analysis
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AVVC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Inspection Date: 08/17f2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
rc
Facility Number: 490027
1
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle -Dairy Caff 15 35
Cattle - Dairy Heifer 60 20
Cattle - Dry Cow 40 30
Q Cattle - Milk Cow 170 130
Total Design Capacity: 285,
Total SSLW: 359,250
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
este Pond WSP 18.00 48 00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 08117/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? n ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other n
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) n n n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
n
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
Cl
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit. Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
Q
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
fl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0 ■ 0 C!
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n ■ n Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n n ■ n
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ Q n
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
In ■ ❑ [_I
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n ■ Q n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
■ Q n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 4
I

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
�!
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
n
Transfers?
fl
Rainfall?
n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
0
■
0
0
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? n
U
■
0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
■
n
n
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
■
0
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
❑
Cl
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Yac
Nn
NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? n ■ n Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those 0 ■ n 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air rl ■ n fl
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AVVC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Nte: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issue& Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility:fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 ■ Q C-)
32. Did Reviewedlnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on-site representative? 0 ■ n
33. Does facility'require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 ■ El 0
Page: 6
I
1111L__ ._ _. r,. . .::

r� Division of Water Quality
F1 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number : 490027 Facility Status: 691-1ve Permit: AWC490027 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: lMdpll Region: Mooresville
Date of Visit: 12/06/2006 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Millstone Dairy Farm. Owner Email:
Owner: J Norman Riddle Phone: [phone] ^^
Mailing Address: 671 Pisaah Church Rd Stony Point NC 28678
Physical Address:
Facility Status: M Compliant n Not Compliant
Location of Farm.,
Integrator:
Latitude: 35°54'40" Longitude:03 52'00;
From the intersection of Hwy, 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right Genereal
location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi. north of Statesville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: David N Riddle
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection $ Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
On -Site Representative(s): Name
On-site representative David N. Riddle
Operator Certification Number: 21434
Title Phone
Phone. [phone]
24 hour contact name David N. Riddle Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: James Bealle Phone: cjo't--� _—L3S•'ZtcZ
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)
Inspection Summary:
05/23/06 > Waste Analysis > N = 3.0 Lbs/100D Gallons
06/16/05 > Waste Analysis > N = 5.1 Lbs/1000 Gallons
09/20/06 > Soil Analysis
24. Calibration of waste application equipment scheduled in December, 2006.
ib
Page: 1

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle
Inspection Date: 12f0612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 490027 !
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 170 135
Total Design Capacity: 170
Total SSLW: 238,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k1ste Pond WSP 18.00 24.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWC490027 Owner -Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number: 490027
Inspection Date: 0210612006 Inspection Type: Compliance lnspecftn Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Waste Application
Structure
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
Application Field N
0
improvement?
Other ' .
n
n
■ n
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n
n
■
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
n
■
n
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collections Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
n
■
❑
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Q ■ n n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
D
■ n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■ n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■ n
if yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
D
Frozen Ground?
n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
n
Page: 3

Permit: AVVC49CO27 Owner -Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date: 12/06/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? D
Total P205? Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? Q
Evidence of wind drift? n
Application outside of application area? Q
Crop Type 1 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
■
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Timothy, Orchard, &
Rye Grass .
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
n
Crop Type 6
Q
Soil Type 1
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n
■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
n
■
Q
0
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
Q
D
■
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n
■
n
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
n
n
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q
■
0
0
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Q
■
Q
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Page: 4
i

3
- Permit; AVVC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddie Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date: 12/06/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
WUP?
n
Gheckiists?
Design?
n
Maps?
n
Other?
n
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
n
■
fl
l=l
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
n
120 Minute inspections?
n
Weather code?
n
Weekly Freeboard?
fl
Transfers?
n
Rainfall?
n
inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
n
Waste Analysis?
n
Annual soil analysis?
n
Crop yields?
n
Stocking?
n
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
0
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
n
n
n
25, Did the facility fait to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
11
D
■
n
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
fl
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
n
■
n
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
Ill
0
0
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWC490027 Owner - Facility: J Norman Riddle Facility Number : 490027
Inspection Date:' s. 12/06/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
r
Otherlssues
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes. contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility ;fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/f6pector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
n■nn
Page: 6
ti

O� W A R Michael F. Easley, Governor
�? William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
-�
Q � Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2004 Z ECE1':.:
1. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490027
Millstone Dairy Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear). Norman Riddle:
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for animal facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate
Bill 733 (Session Law 2003-28).
To correct the facility's animal capacity and in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill 733, we are
hereby forwarding to you this corrected Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J. Norman Riddle,
authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application
system in accordance with General Permit AW0200000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Millstone Dairy harm, located in Iredell County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 170 Dairy Cows, 15 Calves, 60 Heifers, 40 Dry Cows, and the
application to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009, and shall hereby void the
COC dated October 1, 2004, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pgy careful attention to the record keepin;;
and monitoring conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site-specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
None Carolina
turn!!
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: http:A2o.encstate.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional'Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490027
APS Central Files

J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville NC 28625
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 1, 2004
Alan W. Klimek, P. E„ Director
Division of Water Quality
OCT 9 2004
NC DEPT tlr r�,y>+'1EPIT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIIONAL OFFIC r
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490027
Millstone Dairy Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
On June 11, 2004, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued a revised State General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued in accordance with the directive of Senate Bill
733 (Session Law 2003-28).
In accordance with your application received on February 14, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J.
Norman Riddle, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supersedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490027 which expires October 1, 2004.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Millstone Dairy Farm, located in Iredcll County, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 285 Dairy cattle and the application to land as specified in the
facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Since this is a revised State
General Permit, it contains new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained in the
previous State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to tate record keeping
and monitorinp, conditions in this permit.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Pian developed.
Aquifer Protection Section — Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc,us
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina

The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current MRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process, Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact J.R. Joshi at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Iredell County Health Department
Iredeil County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File AWC490027
APS Central Files

q1
Type of Visit Wompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ouZoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit:57Zl'OS Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: r� �Region: 42o
Farm Name: M��
S�+N /,Ytr 1iefcxr Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ D'o 2.°���t✓ Phone:
Mailing Address: tt, <3 ! � �+�� _�'f j57;a's&:ll4 A)C
Physical Address: I
Facility Contact: _�j�r %a.�� Title: AscPhone No. -
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
(Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Ciits
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: __ roQ q3y
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: ❑ c =1 Longitude: ❑ o =,
= fl
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow eVO
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl I
Number of Structures: =[
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potentiai adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA EINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
10 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12/28/04 Continued

Facility Number: (( - an Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: 010
❑ NA
Spillway?: y=5
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Designed Freeboard (in): [ `6
No
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 O
❑ NE
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Lpj No
❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ NA
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes El No
❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
No
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any oft he structures need maintenance or improvement? XYes, Wo
[3 NA [3 NE
'
8. Do any of te stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes MNo
[INA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes NfNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �No
[:INA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �<No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drifl ElApplication Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) U ke&+ Fess -141y
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
tZyy,, No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ElIll Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination'!
E] Yes
1J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ YEs
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
6 -14 -of
N; 5.1
� if
Reviewer/Inspector Name W l lI j34Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 440 &14 Date: /. -
12128/04 Continued

• Facility Number: 1/ 17 — a7 Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists
❑ Design El Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ;!�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ',No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes ��,No El NA ED NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? El Yes E{No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
ip No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
7� �p,�rr �o p�•n l��ds.
S ,.+ A6,, -j G `iih+-3 of !. j Creop PIAJ S G ^dCk 0,10 PCG 6Ai
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
RNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
(] Yes
$D No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
El No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
%No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
7� �p,�rr �o p�•n l��ds.
S ,.+ A6,, -j G `iih+-3 of !. j Creop PIAJ S G ^dCk 0,10 PCG 6Ai
kQ r Cdhds d' FAm e- tV,6 4(c C'pm p ), iwt
12/2&/04

l
Facility Number y D_ate of Visit: Time:
=Not Operational C Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certti�Fiedr © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated orAbove Threshold: ....................
FarmName: ........... I.U.f.11.... �av ........... /ir1iR ..... M ...................... County:..... "i K............................................................
OwnerNaxne:...... N...>h''........... .......... ..Rs`.k................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
MailingAddress: .... 1 �i's.............. .el aw........�4 X......K4....................................................................................................... ..........................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: .......................................................................... C ............................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator.... +i.....................................4dj&......................................... Operator Certification Number: ............ .............................
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry PCattle [:]Horse Latitude • 4 °' Longitude • 6 44
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes .9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Iden LiflCT: ... Ai
................................................................................................................................................................. I ...........................
..
Frechoard (inches):
12/12103 Continued

Facility Number: Alf- try
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes 91 No
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 51 No
❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [ICopper and/or Zinc
nn
12. Crop type fASA,11 L Wie s
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e_ residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 09 No
❑ Yes JU No
❑ Yes [KNo
❑ Yes JE No
❑ Yes J1 No
❑ Yes 5P No
'it!. >^,i,v E ,•I' � - _• !. h9.., �"f G2:t -. .�}.;ylA .. _. ., �ft'S�•1 HaY^" E`.f'd ,• llt• tikLe. h r k..,. "1 t.: h!';�.::�15i "E� .. � N ?F-1' `MY k.' f1
`Commeatsl(refer W question`#) Explain any YE5 answers and/or any recommendations ar any athee'cemments ;�fi1,�;<33 il�Y
snn` a 1t ` 8'" ! , .a. - 1k .f . -,.A . i a.:;i a �U QA N.fis J YI ^-EE Y�� :.�-.•u�... �,..��...w..�
?Use drawtngr of £actLty tofbetter,cxplaim situataonis {use addtttanal�pagessas necessary) , ; ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
�r�. E{ -E,4� {{° w'1 1 -i. i 5� # 1 "i.b _,i. C; P.. :Y1ga'E-IIl195 ° 3E3. li.. (,•i E�-il°xr. ':ail E b±ks➢e ` 8 -ra•�;
{FF.! F: bs �E! 1. N �i! jllf{lj.E�... WIK (i. F;.1 1�l.. B,E�.f7 )�7�' (E ?3ji)6eiE gay p ' 7�•r.,e€ic E[.1 r)r, {i aYi �(.17�(�°6?. 3..P ,1 «RT�ltxY, i!•�,,uUI.�rM�S31�..�ya� q, �lni ws ��[g[ Ri -. {}}
itFYI�..E:•f��1��e�id�G*
Q LL }
+AJC �u�[% ;-o ittpOtnG �RA'SS /K�f'S (��� �~ Ueg�N r7r�4r Fir Fw r�t1- pVe�•
�
'— C. i-1 !/ b t Fa,vA, j kis Oro,In
D+fei �ti►.+ 'Fu Abort-
44& FieteJ"t "f-' i?elrr�s �Pri/t },,,�t l� MAI�+i+e1
Hv
Reviewer/lns ectorName r���';r.>•:;,'",�ryv1+Tfx.i"i�'">i'i?!"�z`;ihr,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (�{,(t,Lpi �Date: j6 - 3
12/12/03 Continued

7
Facility Number: Al dy — 2,7 1 Date of Inspection (,• o -+y
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted .Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Farm ❑ Crap Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
f@ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [S No
❑ Yes a] No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�'i µ, ` ;Ii�S .i�-;.z [if i
ddit4on al Comments atlYd/Or.Diawsn S t# [4. t l i' l i a r t3, .E f F s d a :3„ y. l Y w s
�E,>»3 °F 6i jixg�9� } -i'jg
r . I+i
E.,,<: , tg d f ,�.. er�P!ii• a z i i.. 4.,� - i}yI F .s3 ; i
,�..d3i PRS..,.:,.. E�:.'€�A ,a%s.. l_&',.2.s' 3.3r,jdtSf ; 'v'€-'t..7N1 '.. _�,_.,..�9 PI,f.Y ,..S:L. .�`Y� i..x..4.3�'.,._ a3(i.iiiS.. .,.n�,.,� �NF.�Z�{f« ,:., §.� W ,8.1— _' d Y ,tai, a. dF.Nf.�S.i�i.{fig 7� A ., �jd,34.. brE 3� ,��'��s�e,�il lll?deB6i.?i_r,b',r#,
7
l2/l2103

F WAIF
Michas . Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, .ir.,Secretary
Uj r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
=t Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
D Division of Water Quality
Coleen Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 22, 2003
Mr. David Riddle
1501 Cameron Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Millstone Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490027
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted an inspection of your facility on October 21,
2003. Based on his observations, the facility was well operated and maintained, and the records
were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: File
�D Q
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 677-623-6746 FAX [phone]

•
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 10/21/2003 Time: L.=
Facility Number 49 27
Q Not O lerational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Aboye'fhreshold. ............... .._......
FarmName: .............................................................................. County: Irellell ................................................ MQ...........
Owner Name: .1.lYclr=a .......................... R,itltllx..... ............ ....... »....................... . Phone No: (.70,44.8.76:..9,32fi........ ... ..... ...................
._��.......
Mailing Address: X3��.S1ui�:.Csei~�.tut;d.............................»......................_........... States.illp..Kc........................... ............. ............. . U.C5 .............
Facility Contact: ............... ............................................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
OnsiteRepresentative: D. AYM.WDLE.....,»................................._....................,......Integrator: ........... ...... ......... ..»...... .................. ......... ..... ............ .....
Certified Operator. Doxix A ................................. Riddle ............................................... Operator Certification Number%Z1.43�.............................
Location of Farm:
From the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right •
Genereal location: North on Hwy 115, 8 mi. north of Statesville. ..
❑ Swine C]Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 72T-1lam. Longitude 80 • 52 00
- L Design Current
Swine; _ capacitv, Population 'Poultry,..- PCa aci P
Qh,
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
sb °kPK Totalbe
J Y 1 r,.�'1 '►'
�TyH
r. Design - i ': Current
Cattle' -W` "` Caaci --,Population
10 Dairy 285 195
T1 XT_�
4-
ipac tYt 285
5SLN 399,000
�& Nttmlier of I:agoouti . ' 1 +>ti �QSubsurface Drains Present1 ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area '^
Holding Ponds"f;.Solid_ Taps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
exp •S"
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. 1f discharge is observed. was the convevance man-made? ❑ Yes El No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes. notify DWQ) Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
waste Collection & Treatment'
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Srructure 2 Structure 3. Structure 4 Strucitire 5 Structure 6
identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 30
ncieam r s`.....s......r

vJ/ VJl V ■
Facility Number: 49-27
Date of Inspection 10/2112003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wasle Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Fescue (Hay)
4UtlJ!!tN CIt
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes N No
® Yes j] No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ONO
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
ommentss refer to uestian;; -°' y�-'M�y
lain:art'ES auswers.apolor an ecammendations ar an other Comments. -
sedraci�totte expla ntuaGnn .�t use additi n Pa es�ess'"a�
,. ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
STORAGE POND REQUIRES GENERAL MAINTENANCE.
naytH.r•-
f
Reviewer/Inspector NameAlan" Johson:�-�*rv. •��=.;::r.r�rrs��:,�.,��,��..
wY�.. ::>� �. ��.�r � d.. .r.�.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � i� 1 c u-..� Date: ,ze — �03

W A fiFR4G
l
Mica F. Easley
Governor
William -G. Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Y Alan W.iUimsic, Director
'Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 14, 2002
David Riddle
1501 Cameron Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Millstone Dairy, Site Inspection
Certificate of Coverage: AWC490027
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted an inspection of your facility on November I3,
2002. Based on his observations, the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained, and the
records were complete. Enclosed please find a copy of the inspection report, which should be self-
explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
,
N�nEnIR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 49 27 tate of Visit: 11/13RU112 Time: •�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name:MIUMa>!ne.J?A1ry.karm........................................................... County: I1CtridleiJ... ....................... �....�._.......
Owner Name: .h1�OrlgAllRid&._....._._.-._._-.._._._. Phone No: (7Q4}.�7.(:Q3911---------_.--------------..
Mailing Address: jjQ.aSJgAw..Cr!Itis}CRQ&d.................................................................... . UICSY111C.M............................................ ........... 8 5...............
Facility• Contact: ........................................................... Title: ............................................... Phone No:
Onsite, Representative:�IRI2I.------•-------•-------------------- Integratar:------------------------------------------»
Certified Opera tor: Dayid..N. ............................... Riddle ............................................... Operator Certification Number:214.34•••,..,„,,......... ....
Location of Farm:
rom the intersection of Hwy. 115 and SR 1903 (Snow Creek Rd), travel east on Snow Creek Rd. First house on the right
:venereal location: North on Hwy, 115,8 mi. north of Statesville.
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ® Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • ®•F 40--1 bi Longitude F 80 • 52 00 •�
?Design M :'Currenti eiign: y -Current �Y-`; '� a' "Design t .'C11rreIIt.i':'
Swine ,.Ca "aci 4:Pti t&tit' Poultry :: , ,;Capacity: Population `'Cattle. �Capaclty..PoPulation
h�
�F
a:
�j
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
L" ❑ Farrow to Wean
may.
s„ ❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
„ ❑ Boars
J Layer pg Dairy 1 250 1 140 "'.
] Non-Layer❑Non-DairyEl Other
.._"rte... mac`• -,Y --w. hx ,ti ?hrn<�1. � � ': _ •
D8S1g11'Copaclty ; 250 { '
'AF
350,000
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
1, 'Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field. ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated floc+r in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ® Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ...-•-•.._. ........................... --•----••--•--•--•-•---•---•--•--•--•--•--•--•--.__............................. ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 15
nrin2/Ar �^..s:......r

V.1/ UJ/Vt
Facility Number: 49-27
Date of Inspection 11/13/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need nmintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Anolication
I-Us"mMcis
d%
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding. ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Corn (Silage & Grain)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
1111MMI'l, ,1111!! AV Mm® ns y�tLer' . mdpea
i tip' - ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
AS SOON AS WEATHER ALLOWS, THE WASTE IN THE STORAGE PONDS NEEDS TO BE APPLIED TO THE CROPS.
A GRADUATED MARKER NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED IN THE STORAGE POND.
Reviewer/Inspector Name AI:ANiJOHNSON a r s : *t ?; . ..: d. ' 71
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /".l' „ �. _- - �,� Date: �L�

r - State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James S. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
A0000%- 1 A 0 A�
E3EHNR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FEBRUARY 10, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
15A NCAC 211.0217
Millstone Dairy Farm, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Animal Operation Site Inspection report for the inspection conducted
by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office at your dairy on February 7, 1997. The report should be self-
explanatory.
Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from your facility. He was informed that it was from the
milking parlor and was due to a blockage in the line to the lagoon. This discharge is a violation of
the deemed permitted status pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by February 26, 1997 indicating
the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations.
919 North Main Street, 4C FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-663-1699 ; -�� 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Norman Riddle
February 12, 1997
Page Two
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
Sincerely,
Tke'O'v ercash, P. E.
Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
011

i y :❑ DSWC Admal'Feediot:Opexation Review
WQ animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspectl6R r w
Routine O Com faint O Follow -u of DW ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of inspection „2
–� TIme of Inspection d Use 24 hr. time
Farm Status:""—'"'" '"'
Total Time (in !tours) Spent onReview
"—"'—'"'"" "" or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name:..�Y�LLr. 1� ....__�!....._..... ".......
_ ....._.....
Owner Name: .... .._.... .4 . [...0 .... �..f.�Cs . " ✓_YYl.»"
Mailing Address: _116 31>
Onsite Representative:
CertifiedOperator:_ : . a•..._ .... .... ....._....... "......... ...... »»....." ....."_
Location of Farm:
County:
Phone
_...:.�,��..... _......
......_.. _..... �,� .:._.
Iategrato r:.""...."._......_..._w._._"..�..__..."_�...._w...._
Operator Certification Number: _ ................... ... _....... _....
_ _.s�..... _ate _... C.;_ s....._..... r--.".... _ . ......__...._.. ! �:... ... »...._...._ ..............._.. _._......_...._......._....... 4
.......... "__..._ ...__.___._._.....»_.. - Y.... _".......".w.._ .._ ...".._ ".._........_....._......_ ..»."_. _......_ ....».»....__..... ».... _ ... __......"......_.....
Latitude
Longitude �• ��«
�y.
l- i<�
CJ Not Operational Date Last Operated: "."..,.C_. '_ _�y!v _.., ...., ,...., •e,..u_c
7 ,..L('
?„_».....
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Swine Number ;>
Poultry :Number' Catt[e Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
.
❑ Layer
MaLyl
IzGC:
[] Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Beef
f
Farrow to Wean
r
Farrow to F ede
❑ Other Type of Livestock
Farrow to Finish
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
a e
❑ Lagoon Area E] Fie Area
eneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? (j Yes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ONO
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? L 1.
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? M Yes ❑ No
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Ycs 0 No
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hoiding ponds) require ❑ Yes ❑ No
mai ntenance/improvement?
Continued on back

4,-7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after I11/97)?
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons and/or lioldln2 Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
_ANWE ._._
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
NN"Rstc APglication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DW
WQ)r
15. Crop type
Ib. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
Fnr Certified Facilities Oniv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
U Yes4w.L�No
❑ Yes
Uvo
❑ Yes
RNo
' Yes
;4 No
Lagoon.4W_
❑ Yes
g No
❑ Yes
JR No
W Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
&No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Q No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments:
Use dxawin s. of,facili to better;ex laid situations. use additional a es as nieces . Y �k
8 ty P . { p. g/?YI)r�
QS t1+:� b�}r..t .� C Os1 1, "-) 1 A� '�dl� sick C �U�
f � r R.
pipe_ �r Aov- O} C6 '-Nk k -c: U. rltoa, , ; '
tkk . 1 } ts µ40 lm'AaC" C'O'Y 1
Tl�'£_
C .t ti/t e f c Sa l Ll�W� t -L Z W114 IP kLC 6
\ -�J1 t l
J J ril.-er— A5. G %\6 \ � �\ G.`f-Y` �D � l'� : \ E_[�-Y' � C\ S G C��\ w' �` � � [ L� Cil\U �-�% � S G:'yt� l•Lr a.`aj`C
`ka 61Pe.55 srs{f \_ `+'-' v� tc�S�l be— 71-�rac1iC_�.
Rerlewer/Inspector Name N
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
r: Division of Water Qualiry" Water, 9uality Section, Facility A;seslsment Unit+ l � ,�. � � H/14
� (_ .� � �(n
Ir 6M'
c L { IM,Y•. ►��ti� t C' -4t tvrik7±AC1it�2tic i tLEE L'.t.t'C�l iC� l"\C�v C. l..t' �` i.C. �� �
hyta�tr4 •� � r�YVkr_C� . 1
C�s1C� CL GC.- �,•� i tc� �itu� 1�� t � l (r �� — .—�

�©� W AT��Q
�O G
r
r
Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC, 28625
Subject:
Dear Mr. Riddle:
CXCDFP
Mict►aei F. Earley
X11J Governor
William G, Ross, Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality .
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 14, 2002
Operation Review/Compliance
Millstone Dairy, Facility 4f: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
The year 2002 is the beginning of the fifth year of the animal operation inspection program, Given this,
there should be no misunderstanding as to what is required. However, as a reminder, the following information is a
partial list of what is required:
• A copy of the Permit, Certified Farm Plan, and Certification form(s) must be available for review.
The certified farm plan must be followed (application rates, fields used for waste
application, and crops grown to receive waste must be adhered to). You are in violation if you do
not comply with any aspect of your farm plan or permit.
• Annual soil analysis (properly documented) is required. The soils lab states that the preferred time (for
efficiency) to process samples for analysis is between May and September.
• Waste analyses must be conducted within 60 days of the waste application date. If the results are
irregular, this should give adequate time to collect/analyze a new sample.
• Waste application records. The records should be complete and legible. Errors should not be erased, but
marked through and the correct information written on the following line. Remember, although the
information may be clear to you or the operator, the information must be understandable to the person(s)
performing the review.
• Weekly freeboard records must be maintained. The "pump marker" must be clearly marked and visible at
all times. There should be no question as to what is the pump marker during an inspcetion.
• A certified operator must be designated. By completing a form and mailing to DWQ.
• The facility must be maintained and operated according to the operation and maintenance information
enclosed in the farm plan. This includes maintaining the area (mowing) around buildings and the
lagoon/storagc pond embankments.
The list above comprises the majority, but certainly not all, of the requirements that must be followed. If
permitted, the conditions of your permit should be review by you and your operator. Failure to have the necessary
information available for inspection or to comply with the conditions of your permit could result in a Notice of
Violation or further enforcement actions. If there is any uncertainty on your part regarding compliance with the
permit, please feel free to contact Rocky Durham with the Division of Soil and Water or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Alan D. Johnson
Environmental Specialist II
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 -North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE m4) 6$3-1699
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

F w rF
� RAG Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross,.Jr..Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
"r Kerr T: Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER'QUALITY SECTION
May 16, 2001
David Riddle
1501 Cameron Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677
Subject: Notice of Deficiency ,
Millstone Dairy, Site Inspection
Facility #: 49-27
Iredell-County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Mr. Alan'Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility on May -15,
2001. This letter is being issued as a Notice of Deficiency for failing to perform the annual waste
analysis for the year 2000.
With the exception of the above noted deficiency, the facility appeared to be well
maintained and the records were complete.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: File
AWA —
IN ff -6 ENWR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7746
Sincerely,
�'.�-:kms►-�--'
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]

�J:�? .:w.r. �. �'�3�'*(Ft � fir'. 0 i ! r r e •"� r r' :-; � .u� � _^yj �.,..�2��..� � r .r �l,�K is �•-
�.., � ��:' ' r �yi�. ,i,+K:'�Y�.;,� ��y^��� +.s o -1 � � r . �r � • F � ' ' ' _ , r r 3S f i �`r,'ri ;�.,�,'1y�3.�.�i:t�,�! _ 's�i�7.,-''-:+1
�� :� � . `��-&�:9����,�y�k DRi -"1'4i �'1 Q � r - r � �+r + -{•�+�u..r.1 G'r'r!'!: [. �•.r.�r�r - ���-i��a� _ '`` ����" �.�
ri•{i .� � � r � Y.:..::.,: , l�.'h� ate' J• a�'�J :'�^„' _�% "-Yt �r7/.. t
Y� 'k•'.�c.'�.`�f .+'7 e.�i�.«: �S!,t _ 5^.. ,Y .,7 -ri M+..i.. :.'�`-,` T�?r� 'y
Type of Visit NQompliance Inspection O Operation Review .O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for -Visit 12 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit:
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
[3 Permitted V Certified .13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .......... ' Lt�.lh,.�?.!.��� ............ ..� f CounCy:..... ?..............................................
Owner Name Phone No:
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title................................................................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: ....... ....... br.............. ............ ............................ 7
Onsite :Kepresentative: Integrator.
_.........1�_i _ �. ._.-__.......,...............—W...w.-..._._._......... -- .....
Certified Operator: ............... ............_�...._.�.....Operator Certification Number: ......... ...................... .-...
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry(Cattle E]Horse Latitude �' �` 0° Longitude • �` �`+
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder JE1 Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ soars Total SSL* -
Nuniber.of-Lagoons; ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Sprav Field Area
Holdin Ponds / Soli 'Traps
g ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharces & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharQz is observed, what is the estimated now in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
Z. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes R�
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EINo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ZNo
01/01/01 , Continued

• - ,r., �� .L'ri..+�� � r� ...��+•� .�— may,. �n �`ti.�.- - .u. ." a .--�.�«. _ �. ��.. F�-L_�
acslity Number: - —:r�, s,�: Date of Inspection !'
NVaste Collection & 'Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spill-;::% ❑ Yes fs No
Structure 1 Structure ? Structure 3 St:-,:cta: Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................... ... .--_............
Freeboard (inches): .............r6
I. ............ ................ ........ ........... ................. .... ............ ....................
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed" yes, severe erosion.
�,:epztge, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed thro- `. a xaste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.0 was answered yes, and the sittiatiun p„se- an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify 1)W .
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the wastc management system other than waste structures requir- n•,.::nicnancelimprovement'?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minim ---i liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers -that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidence of over application? - ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ H,-,d7aulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes 1 No
❑ Yes 'ff� No
❑ Yes —E No
❑ Yes ROO
❑ 1'es N Na
❑ Yes 1Ato
❑ Yes Et No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 19Na
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [-No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ] No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes gG No
17. Are rock o rops present? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Is there a wa tL� supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfteld boundary? ❑ Unknown ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ On-site ❑ Off-site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily El Yes No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Mana--_:-:cm Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.)
21. Does record keepin.- need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis c.: soli sample reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the t:: � f design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in -charge?
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergencv situations as required by General PL=::.
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
25, Did Revie-er/Inspector fai! tc discus_ ,zwie«r'inspection with on-site represent::t: -
26. Does faciiity reauire a fr !lc: :._.. _ sato: agency?
27. Were any additional probi".:s note- ..._a C;; use noncompliance of the Certi :_
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe ;'Tern the cur. int:rnem b ,.ild:ng to the storage pond or
liquid leve: of iagoon or Stora �- Vie: - itn no a_•itation?
29. Are there any dead anima's .o: :, _z _ _- . rropariy ;within 24 hours?
01/01,'01
❑ Yes [5.No
E[Yes .❑.No
© Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes ' Q No
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes A� No
':o discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes '7 No
Continued

Facility Number: — Z Date of Inspection Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan.blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ;h o
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 1Z] No
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
OI/0l/0l
Date:

"J, MESJ3'HUNTJsY:w?:.
-GOVERNORF;
BILL HOLMAN
David Riddle
1501 Cameron Dr.
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
�P.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
August 28, 2000
Subject: DWQ Animal Operation Inspection
Millstone Dairy, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection of your facility
on August 24, 2000. Based on his observations, the records were found to be
complete and the facility appeared to be well operated and maintained. Enclosed
please find the inspection report, which should be self-explanatory.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Johnson or me at [phone],
cc: File
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Fl1zST
7 0 I 0
DID NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORROVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNETY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SOX RCCYC1,ED/1O% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

IR Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit -0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
y Z Datt• ur Visit: lzzvx;'ell-iint:: I / "5E I Printed un: 7/21/2000
Faciiity Number
Q Not Operational O Iielow Threshafd
Q Permitted �erfified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: ..........%/....�f. /.(.,7._.� G:a..c:. .......%.T: ...,. A- -...V County: ...... x..i.. e: ��4 . L'. ��..............................................
Owner Name:........ ..lL. L�1�1.2.Z G1../.T. ... d..'......... Phone No:...._....C.'. a..
....
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone/Nu:...................................................
�3ailinrAddress:.......1....4:..........l...fc.11:z.�'!_:���.?.. .....� ............................. ......... : �rY� !_. ............ .............. .?��! 7 �_
Onsite Representative : ..... ....... . x�`i.�'.............. ..`.. Kl'. �-..................... integrator:.............
.........................................................................
r
CertifiedC)peruicrr:,...-.!-��.�„_t................. _his»._.. �' .............................. Operator Certification
Location of Farnt:
rl
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' Longitude • s
Design Current
�wene
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Non Layer
J❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
airy
[] Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present�] Lai in Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
❑Spray Fietd Area
Discharges s Stream Im aq,;
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ;Io
Discharge origlnatcd at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischurgv is observed, was the conveyance ttsan-made'?
❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If dischan-re is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑yes (] No
c. If discharge is obsurved, what is the CAUTuttcd iluw in galhniti?
d. Dees discharge hypa.5s a lagoon system'' (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [] No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pari of the operation?
[I Yes b No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters otthe State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes '18No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? KLspillway
❑ Yes ONo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
ldcnti Ficr: .......... _....... ........ ..._ ... ....... -� -. .».».....
_..._......... .__».»..
Freeboard (inches): '36-1
vnn
Continued on back

Date of Inspection . 712712000Facilit,v Number: u
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe crosion,
❑ Yes
9No
seepage, etc.)
A.
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z UG 5/00
closure plan?
❑ Yes
rNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvemcnt?
❑ Yes
&No
8. Docs any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
P No
4. Do any stuctures lack adequate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
[KT10
Waste ikpp5cation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
ZNo
11. Is there evidence of over application? y ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
1� No
12. Croptype 1
13. Do the receiving crops differ with t ose designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
h) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Docs the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
C No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
KNo
Reouired Records & Dncuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &: General Permit readily available?
El Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design. maps, etc.> ❑ Yes ,eTNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation. freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes EE�No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes C}No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'? ❑ Yes M§,Wo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ElYes W10
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative'? ❑ Yes Z -No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �to
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes A No
0: bio 4vi6latioris'ot- &,flcienc�es •mere nofied- ditfitig �tbls'visit: - ;Y:oij will •Te de ;ce Bio fui-tlter -, - .'
. , coirres 6t Bence. abatit: this visit:....: .. .:...:.:...:.....:.:. .:.. .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
A.
t
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: z UG 5/00

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bili Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
3163 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
61L
1 � �
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Ka DEPT. f3p
December 30, 1999 0�oraawrit-' r.. r?'R..
'JAN 10 2000
8F Il']ir'1�'0.11VAl fd$tlAill 01
� .TILE W
Subject: Fertilizer Application Recordkeeping
Animal Waste Management System
Facility Number 49-27
Iredell County
This letter is being sent to clarify the recordkeeping requirement for Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
application on fields that are part of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
In order to show that the agronomic loading rates for the crops being grown are not being exceeded, you
must keep records of all sources of nitrogen that are being added to these sites. This would include nitrogen
from all types of animal waste as well as municipal and industrial sludges/residuals, and commercial fertilizers.
Beginning January 1, 2000, all nitrogen sources applied to land receiving animal waste are required to
be kept on the appropriate recordkeeping forms (i.e. IRR1, IRR2, DRY1, DRY2, DRY3, SLUR1, SLUR2,
SLDI, and SLD2) and maintained in the facility records for review. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
compliance inspectors and Division of Soil and Water operation reviewers will review all recordkeeping during
routine inspections. Facilities not documenting all sources of nitrogen application will be subject to an
appropriate enforcement action.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with any State Rule, State Statute, Local County Ordinance, or permitting
requirement.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sonya Avant of the
DWQ staff at [phone] ext. 571.
SincereI ,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10%n post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 6, 1999
Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC, 28525
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Operation Site Inspection
Millstone Dairy, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office conducted a site inspection at your facility on
August 4, 1999. This Notice of Deficiency (NOD) is being issued for failure to have
the curbing and fencing installed as required by the certified plan. This work needs to
be finished immediately. It was also noted that the cropping sequence for tract 210
had been altered. This needs to be noted in your farm plan. Finally, the milk parlor
discharge pipe should be marked in a manner as to denote that it is your pump marker.
During many of Mar. Johnson's inspections he has noted that some farms are often
missing one or more components of the farm pian that should be available for review. The
items below must be available for review during the inspection.
• Certification forms.
• Site Diagram: Fencing, streams, buffer zones, and feed areas must be shown.
• Waste Application records with accompanying waste analysis.
• Maps of acreage and irrigated fields.
• Waste Utilization pian: Tract/field number, usable/wettable acres (not
necessarily total acreage), list of crops, PAN required, and amount of waste
produced by livestock.
• Waste and Soil analysis info; Must have 3 years of data.
It is suggested that this be maintained in a single folder.
• Emergency Action Plan must be posted.
• Insect, Odor Control, and Mortality Checklists must be completed.
• Certified Operator renewal card.
019 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 13
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Page 2
Failure to have the above components available and complete could result in a Notice
of Violation or other enforcement actions. Also remember that waste applications should
be made during the time the crop can utilize the nutrients in the waste. In general waste
should be applied no earlier than 30 days prior to planting.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, F.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor

°E f •r �al. Q Division of Soil andrwateC Gonselrvation , Operation Review,
Division of Soiland WaterlConserva""tion 'Compliance inspection)
r!i i I '
DIVISIoil of Water Quahty� :, Compli�inri �iLClfectio11
Other�Agency,- Operation Review
l�a9, 13,E _-�.. .-. ... ,.. :... ,. _. .. ,... .. a... _. .>e!,l.,:,,. - , _. il., .. $'a,a i,1„__3J ...-._, ✓> ! ,, ,.. ,�,. �'_
ZRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number C Date of Inspection
'line or Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 0 Not O eaonalDate Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: ...........Ar.11 ..,..... ,....... ..t..r. ...... County .................. !C`' ..1................................
OwnerName: ............ .1.!...l,t%... ...... /�r t. T.p.'I. .......................... Phone No: .......................................................................................
FacilityContact: ............`.................................................................Title:............................,................................... Phone No:................................p..................
Mailing Address:..../ [A. ..........: 1�Q..u�....... C .� .........el ............ ........� �,.i�.t.�..1.��,,.,............................
Onsite Representative: .............. Z.) ................ R;.4j e......................... .. Integrator: .......................................... ..................... .......................
Certified Operator:....I�qfJ.J............................. r... /` ;,................... Operator Certification Number: , �.
Loci of Farm:
....................................I A,
E....r ........................... ...............................................................................................................................................................................,....................1.� I
Latitude Longitude
; Design Current ' 't D'e`sigii" Current,. , Design Curren
Swnne ; Ca acity Population- - PouEtry �.. Ca . acity ., Po elation Cattle Capacity Population `.
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Num
Y I`
of Lagoons,, F Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area '
Is /.Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impaet�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'A No
Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (byes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (I1•yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ,❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes X] No
Waste Collection & Treatment /�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes �No
Strueiure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Q
Freeboard(inches):.........:.i..�f .9................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, [] Yes kNo
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer
';'
❑ Non -Dairy
�I! ❑ Other
Total Design -Capacity
Total'SSLW
of Lagoons,, F Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area '
Is /.Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impaet�
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'A No
Discharge originated au ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (byes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (I1•yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ,❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes X] No
Waste Collection & Treatment /�
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Spillway ❑ Yes �No
Strueiure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Q
Freeboard(inches):.........:.i..�f .9................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, [] Yes kNo
seepage, etc.)
3123199 Continued on back

Facility Number: -- !.late of inspection
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures requirc maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
0
`XVo
❑ Yes
1E5_yes
❑ No
❑Yes
12�No
❑ Yes
R.No
❑ Yes
'.No
❑ Yes
VNo
12. Crop type cam I T �ccI e-
'
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 1�5No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Docs the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes JS No
❑ Yes C�Wo
❑ Yes P;No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes %$ No
❑ Yes AD No
❑ Yes $5,No
❑ Yes �w No
[I Yes $!jNo
❑ Yes R.No
❑ Yes ]a No
�'Vo yiola�icjigi -ot 4heie'nues •were pQted• OOth)g 4Ms'visit! - Y:oit wiil•reeeiye iio f uttllgr, • . ^
;cor'res' orideRce: albout this visit: ........:... ^ . ^ . ^
�;..1=, �, ..
Comments' (infer to `' uestinn # Ex lain an YES answers andlor any recortiiinendations�oir.`any other comments. -,.d 4
Use7drawings of facility 16better e�iplam=situations �(use°nddtt<onal �pages_as,necessa6i�1, IL` "�' ,E�i 1 til; ,li;'p' a
"
I� ;1•. t
`
N -6 �� esM,eX- en cci( aC; o� avl coyk pt� C.—I "U k-
Irp ltls+Ar_ �"ro6
IVCCA Wte":'.11A.« o-� CYA p0.
( ,
1 *ac: .216 i -s 3117r , crf'o� - F�ra�r�r n p�a d •` rte s 1 ha i h
5�or omA? is 61\ , '
a e_err CA
Q_ 6 k
�7K RS
e_ AAc&-
! -'7', '�..2 `nn 1 !- F`YY {I tf�"Vit i4➢F i,
*,1'�' M
Reviewer/Inspector Name {L1 ,
°A©:,
I,.d,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
�1/ 3123/99

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE R9wONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 13, 1998
Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC, 28625
Subject: Site Inspection
Millstone Dairy, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
Mr. Alan Johnson of this office has been asked on several occasions about the
appropriate time and proper method to take soil and waste samples. AIso, during his
inspections, he has noticed that while the storage capacity may be adequate in the
storage pond/lagoon, in some cases it was not at the level set forth in the waste
utilization plan. Mr. Johnson has also noted that some animal operations using
hay/pasture systems do not appear to be properly managing the hay crop in the waste
application fields. This letter is to highlight some concerns and provide some general
guidance regarding the management of the storage pond/lagoon and waste application
fields. For more specific/detailed information, please contact your technical
specialist or your local agricultural extension service.
Be advised that should a farm be found violating its farm plan and/or have an
unpermitted discharge, besides facing civil penalties, the facility could be required to
apply for an individual permit. Currently, most farms are operating under a general
permit.
Waste applications
Just as you manage the animals at your facility, proper management of the
waste (lagoon/storage pond level) is important. The waste must be pumped from the
ponds at the correct time and provide for maximum utilization of the nutrients by the
crop. Remember, waste application rates in your farm plan are based on agronomic
principles, and assumes the waste will be applied when the nutrients are required
(e.g., applying waste to corn at tasseling or bermuda grass in November is of little
use for the uptake of nitrogen). Also, the established application rate assumes that
the previous crop has been removed from the field. `
910 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORE9VILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 291 15
PHONE 704-[68-1 689 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER- 90% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r,
Page 2
Grass and small grain crops grown for hay should be harvested in a timely manner. To
maximize nutrient uptake, as indicated in the waste utilization plan, and for highest quality, the
crop should be harvested at early boot stage (generally every 4 to 5 weeks). Small grain for
silage can be harvested in the soft dough stage when direct cut. Contact your agricultural
extension agent or technical specialist for proper guidance.
General Recorranendations for Nitrogen(NM' &Rlicattiion for Commgn CroRs:.
• Small Grains: One-third (1/3) N at planting and remainder in late February or early
March.
• Corn/Sorghum: For facilities that pump and haul, N should be applied prior to planting.
For those facilities that irrigate, a split application with half at planting and the remainder
when the com is 18 inches high.
• Fescue/Orchardgrass: Apply one-half (1/2) of the N in mid-February to March and one-
half (1/2) in mid-August to September.
• Bermuda grass: Establishing: 30 to 40 lbs N/ac at planting and 30 to 60 lbs N/ac when
runners appear (6 -8 wk. after planting). Maintaining: 50 to 60 lbs N/ac in April and the
remainder of the recommended amount in equal increments in June and July or after each
cutting.
Finally, there have been instances where the amount of waste pumped,(as shown in the
waste application records) from the lagoon/storage pond does not appear to agree with the
amount of waste produced by the animals. One would expect on an annual basis that the amount
pumped would be approximately equal to the amount being produced. For example, if a dairy is
generating 453,000 gal/yr in waste, then approximately 453,000 gallons of waste should be
accounted for in the waste application records over a year. However, there may be some
difference due to how low the storage pond wag pumped, the number of cows being held in the
facility, or the amount of rainfall.
Soil analysis (FREE)
Fifteen to twenty (15 to 20) soil samples per field (20 acres or less) is desirable. The
samples should be thoroughly mixed and sent in as one sample. Each sample should be pulled 4
inches deep for pastures and no -till systems and 8 inches deep for conventional tillage systems.
Taking samples during the fall is advisable. The state lab is not as busy at that time and
can provide a more timely turn around with the results. This is also a good time to apply lime if
recommended by the soil test. When liming is necessary, it is important that it be applied as
suggested. Maintaining proper soil pH is as important (if not more so) than fertilizing to
maximize crop production.

Page 3
Waste samples/analysis ($4/sample)
The state lab now has the capability to conduct analyses and provide the results within
two working days via the internet. Through the US Postal service allow seven days. Take
samples in a timely manner such that waste application, rates can be based on the most recent
sample results.
Six to eight (6 to S) samples should be taken around the edge of the lagoon/storage pond,
approximately 6 feet from the edge and 12 inches below the surface. These can be mixed to
make one sample. The sample should be refrigerated if it is not going to be shipped the same
day. Always mail waste samples in plastic containers.
For farmers who do not have to agitate the lagoon/storage pond prior to application, it is
strongly suggested that waste samples be taken prior to waste application. This will prevent the
producer from having to go back and complete the waste application record at a later date.
For farmers who apply waste to hay fields and pastures, it is strongly suggested that
waste samples be taken quarterly if the waste is applied anytime during the growing season.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Johnson
or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
ti
1d
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Iredell SWCD
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne vlcDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Regional Water Quality Supervisor
7*;A
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL, RESOURCE5
MC. DR -7r. 0-0
ZN-%1R0N, . R,NT, 3.1VALTA
& NATURAL RSSOURC."YS
MAR 20 1999
FROM: Shannon Langley
AW1EN QG 00MlilT41 t'bMSuEg
snu MAR (Pt
SUBJECT: Application for special agreement
r
Please find attached a copy of application for special agreement for facility number. .
If you have any questions, please call me at 733-5083, ext. 581.
ATTACHMENT
Act V-9)
�S
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

fill}y1HU:r-iLN-i'. i.4
NATURAL R0a0URcLnj
;4 MAR 20 1998
'SMte of North Carolina
Department,.of Environment and Natural Resource1v1S19,x of 101ROW9111TIt KVMGEiiLUJ
Division of Water Quality
APPLICATION FOR A SPECAL AGREEmowCEIVED
(MFOR;1IATION REQUIRED FOR ANEMI AL OPERATIONS REQUESTING A SPEGJAA GWAk R EE�9M�ENT)
I. GENERAL INFORMATION; ATER Qt�,B,Ly SECTION
1. Applicant (Owner of the Facility): � . • AlO P 0i RAI 4ppop* go Ce Enf•
2. Facility No.: q9- Z 7
3. Facility Name: In l ILL S'roov le � X
4. Print or Type Owner's or Signing Official's Name and Title (the person who is.
legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
IV0 m 19 k/ R IDbte owNE-12
dE9
S. V Mailing Address: I I (v ,3 .S /V 4 W C RR010-1
City: .S` 14T6.5 V I LL State: Al -C, Zip: 2 86 2S
%Telephone No.. (70f) 576- 0 -3 � to
6. County' -where facility is located: x FD E L
7. peratiori Type {Swine, Poultry, Cattle}: D A t Y l9ni E
., G r
8. -application Date:J
' II. ELIGIBILITY FOR A SPECIAL AGREEMENT:
As per Senate Bill 1217 which was ratified on June 2I, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with an operator who registered by
SeptembeT.J, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office and who makes
a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management plan by December 31,
1997. This special agreement shall set forth a schedule for the operator to follow to obtain an
approved animal waste management plan by a date certain and shall provide that the FMC shall
not issue a notice of violation for failure to have an approved animal waste management plan so
long as the operator'complies with the special agreement. Operators who did not register by
September 1, 1996 with their local Soil and Water Conservation District office or who can not
document that they made a good faith effort to obtain an approved animal waste management
plan by December 31, 1997, will not receive a Special Agreement from the EMC. These
' facilities will be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties, injunctions and all other
enforcement tools available to DWQ.
' 47
i
1. Date facility requested assistance from their local Soil & Water Conservation District'
'tip •
.FORM SPAG 1198. ,; { ov Page 3y of `4
T c !/,
•.11' l'r�F
• a''i� ! r rJSt, l�Y�, -n.k �'!•�1 Y Y' fix-.

?. Efforts made since February 1, 1993 to develop and implement a certified animal
waste management plan (Use additional sheets if necessary). This summary must
include:..
A. All contacts made with technical specialist
B. Dates and types of plans developed
C. *Contracts signed
D. Funds expended
E. Improvements made to the system
F. Animals removed and not rgtoacked at the facility
G. Other actions taken
i
0 row9.Q v r Ti o .J
7"' 5 a � X Y AP5S —641,( (Ile
rc l
—9 f G7va .Q s i
%C /1 _ T �j Y
FORAM SPAG 1198 Page 2 of 4

II. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OBTAINING CERTIFICATION:
Please list each of the specific things that will be done at your facility to implement a
certified animal waste management plan and the date you will have each activity
completed. This must include a review of the possibility of not restocking animals that
are scheduled to be removed from the facility until such time as a certified plan can be
implemented. Please also list the date on which animals were most recently restocked at
this facility. The EMC reserves the right to deny any proposed schedules that are
excessively long. (Use additional sheets if necessary).
1, RSTE STo� �G E r�� n ~� Ca^�Q L a•le
3
[E�a wArEL
c_dcc.�cr1owt
�j�'C S�sir..ti. JAI IgS'
if0-Vc,eErE
Cure I?Ixu CL
m ER 0,2 rr
5: V E 6-6 rprC- D p IV 6 A5 }_ n AJ - c oma• p �� 7tac
b. ZcLvsrm�,
?. 1 i E F L E A PLnAj r w�
Applicant's Certification:
I, 0 19 N 1 PVC , attest this application for a Special Agreement
with the EMC has been reviewed by'me and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand if all required parts of this application are not completed andif all
General Statutes and Regulations. ,i understand that the failure to meet any dates that are agreed
_ �► IV 0P—m ID DC E
Print Name of Owner
Date
ture of Owner
FORM SPAG 1/98
Page 3 of 4
f.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 17, 1998 NX. nII"-r• On,
CERTIFIED MAIL 0 NA �•�,`;t, � , ,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
..^ JUL 2,(1 19+m
J. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd 21tifl V;7 yet
Statesville NC 28677`' '-k 1,.-,.�,t� atFter
Subject: Special Agreement
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Millstone Dairy Farm
Facility Number: 49-27
Iredell County
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
As per Senate Bill 1217, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, and your application for Special
Agreement which was received on March 11, 1998, the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) hereby proposes to enter into a special agreement with J. Norman Riddle in order to allow
additional time for J. Norman Riddle to obtain and implement a certified animal waste
management plan (CAWMP) for the subject facility.
Please find enclosed the proposed Special Agreement. If you agree to abide by the dates and
terms of the attached schedule, you must sign, date and return the enclosed documents to the
attention of "Shannon Langley" at the letterhead address within fourteen (14) calendar days of
your receipt of this letter.
If you have already implemented your CAWMP or do not wish to enter into the Special
Agreement, please provide us with a response to Mr. Shannon Langley within fourteen (14)
calendar days of your receipt of this letter.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the
responsibility or liability for failure to comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder. All dates and
conditions of this agreement that are not met shall be subject to civil penalties, criminal penalties,
injunctions and all other enforcement tools available to the Division of Water Quality.
Q.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50 % recycled/10% post -consumer paper

14 Therefore, in order to avoid such enforcement actions, I urge you to read the Agreement
carefully, make sure you understand your commitments under the Agreement, and contact Mr.
Langley, if you do not understand or are confused about any condition of the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Mr.
Shannon Langley at [phone] ext. 571or Ms. Sonya Avant at [phone] ext. 571.
Sincerely,
� �51
A
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Facility — Non -Discharge CompliancelEnforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Dewey Botts — Division of Soil and Water
Shannon Langley
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF )
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-27
J. NORMAN RIDDLE
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by J. Norman Riddle, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created.by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works,, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the
Commission as set forth in G.S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical to develop animal
waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed all
applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commission's animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the facility was registered in
accordance with 15A NCAC 21-1.0217(a)(1)(1)).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for
a contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of.the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-27
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the, act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER's" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
6. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-27
Special Agreement
l Page 3
7. The "OWNER", upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule.dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8.. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Millstone Dairy Farm
Print Name of Owner
Date
Signature of Owner
For the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission:
Date
Chairman of the Commission

i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Attn: J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
NCDENR
Nc*" CAROLINA Dm2wrmENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE„SOURGEs
September 2, 1998
Subject:
MCI DR.P I'. (�r
SEP 3 1998
IMS118 4F LIV!.-10i"fa t rt0"'- fit"JT
W.'ZiMIE G i At QF�i6E
Special Agreement
Facility Number: 49-27
Millstone Dairy Farm
Iredell County
Attached for your records is a copy of the signed Special Agreement approved by the
Environmental Management Commission.
The terms and conditions of the Special Agreement are in full effect. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Shannon Langley, of our staff, at (919) 733-
5083, extension 581. -
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, J P.E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc:MRO eR gio`nal"Office
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Facility File
Central Files
Shannon Langley
P.O. Box 29533, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Airkmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF IREDELL
IN THE MATTER OF
SPECIAL AGREEMENT
FACILITY NUMBER: 49-27
I. NORMAN RIDDLE
Pursuant to provisions of North Carolina General Statutes (G.S.) 143-215.2(a) this
Special Agreement is entered into by J. Norman Riddle, hereinafter referred to as
"OWNER", and the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, an agency
of the State of North Carolina created by G.S. 143B-282, and hereinafter referred to as
the Commission:
1. "OWNER" and the Commission hereby stipulate the following:
(a) "OWNER" has previously been deemed permitted in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2H .0217 for the operation of an animal waste treatment works, but was
unable to comply with 15A NCAC2H .0217 (a)(1)(E) requiring an approved
animal waste management plan to be submitted by December 31, 1997.
(b) Failure to obtain and implement a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E) is a violation of State Water
Quality Regulations -and "OWNER" is within the jurisdiction of the Commission
as set forth in G. S. Chapter 143, Article 21.
(c) "OWNER" desires to continue to operate the animal waste treatment works as a
Non -Discharge system.
(d) "OWNER" has secured assistance from a certified technical specialist to develop
an animal waste management system which, once certified, will meet or exceed
all applicable guidelines and standards and will be able to comply with all aspects
of the Commissions animal waste general permit.
(e) During the term of this Agreement there will be no increase in Steady State Live
Weight (SSLW) at the facility. Any new construction will be designed to
accommodate only the SSLW for which the_ facility was registered in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(D).
(e) Since this Special Agreement is by Consent, neither party will file a petition for a
contested case or for judicial review concerning its terms.
(f). Nothing in this Special Agreement shall be taken as absolving or relieving
"OWNER" from any responsibility or liability for discharges of animal waste to
surface waters of the State of North Carolina.
2. "OWNER" desiring to comply with the Permit identified in paragraph 1(a) above,
hereby agrees to do the following:
(a) Undertake all necessary activities in order to obtain and implement a certified
animal waste management plan by September 30, 1998.

Farm Number: 49-27
Special Agreement
Page 2
(b) "OWNER" shall comply with all terms and conditions of the North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.1 and the relevant rules promulgated thereunder
except 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
(c) No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after the date identified in 2(a) above,
submit to the Director of DWQ written notice of compliance or noncompliance
therewith. In the case of noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of
the reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a statement
identifying the extent to which subsequent dates or times for accomplishment of
listed activities may be affected.
3. "OWNER" agrees that unless excused under paragraph four (4), "OWNER" will pay
the Director of DWQ, by check payable to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, stipulated penalties according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadline set out in paragraph 2(a) above.
Failure to obtain and fully implement a Certified $100.00 for the first seven days
Animal Waste Management Plan by the date past the date identified in 2(a)
identified in 2(a) above: $500.00 for each additional
day
4. "OWNER" and the Commission agree that stipulated penalties are not due if
"OWNER" satisfies the Division of Water Quality that noncompliance was caused
solely by:
a. An act of God;
b. An act of war;
c. An intentional act or omission of a third party, but this defense shall not be
available if the act or omission is that of an employee or agent of the defendant
or if the act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship
with the "OWNER";
d. An extraordinary event beyond the "OWNER'S" control. Contractor delays or
failure to obtain funding will not be considered as events beyond the
"OWNER'S" control; or
e. Any combination of the above causes.
Failure within thirty (30) days of receipt of written demand to pay the penalties, or
challenge,them by a contested case petition pursuant to G.S. 150B-23, will be grounds
for a collection action, which the Attorney General is hereby authorized to initiate.
The only issue in such an action will be whether the thirty (30) days has elapsed.
5. This Special Agreement and any terms and conditions contained herein, hereby
supersedes 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(E).
b. Noncompliance with the terms of this Special Agreement are subject to enforcement
action in addition to the above stipulated penalties, including injunctive relief pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6(C).

Farm Number: 49-27
Special Agreement
Page 3 '
7. The "OWNER", Upon signature of this Special Agreement, will be expected to
comply with all schedule dates, terms, and conditions of this document.
8. This Special Agreement shall expire upon owners submittal of a certified animal
waste management plan.
For Millstone Dairy Farm
/)U/sye
Print Name of Owner
nature of Owner
For the North Carolina
S
016 Chairman of the
'/eC(d/�e
Date — 4 — !
Management Commission:
Date X, 21;- xF

/I
� z
(.iV Nis: s'7, T' lkL
NAT" • A,t.. E9
Form SLUR --I Slurry and Sludge Ap} +tion Field Record MAR 9 6 1998
For Recording Slurry Application Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner J. A/c R r, i4 N h 0 L C Facility Number
Spreader Operator D Au I n f� ID 0 L
Tract #
Field #
Date
mrrrlddl r
( y)
Crop Type
Field Size
(acres)
Application
Method t
# of loads
Per Field
Volume of Loads
(gallons)
WAeo97'
SD
81 ,
�SDp
Sl = soil incorporated (disked); BR = broadcast (surface applied)
7 Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owners manual.

1*4
LA
O
8
rb
N
h

Form SLUR -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Slurry and Sludge Appit;,ation Field Record
One Form for Each Field Per Crop Cycle
Field #
0
J,
4J42m4w X110046
6 3 ur7�0-
wS•0CeECIV.PO5+- J'76 -0 3 t 6
N.C. DEPT. OF
ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH ,
& NATUDA€. 11ESOURCE3
t?R 21998
mKMIN
Facility Number
Spreader Operator p# y, p ,e l D L E
Spreader Operators
Address 671 -P1.V Y.# c jy ,e o .S70-- /o,'tiT
Operator's Phone # 7 p Se „ k 7 6 - 3
From Animal Waste Management Plan
Crop Type j Recommended PAN
GlJ %¢ Loading (Ib/acre) = (B) 1 17
(1) (2)
r9ll
(4)
{61
(71
(8)
Date
(mmldd/yr}
# of Loads Per Field
Volume of Loads t
Total Volume
(gallons)
(z) x (3)
Volume Per Acre
(gal/ac)
(4) + (A)
Waste Analysis 2
PAN (Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/ac)
1(6) x (6)) + 1,000
Nitrogen Balance 3
(lb/ac)
(B) - (7)
/2.000
25-0
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature —4)0^4y `
Certified Operator (Print) DOL 1 b i2 ! D D t Operator Certification # 2,
' Can be found in operator's manual for the spreader. Contact a local dealer if you do not have your owner's manual.
' See your animal waste management plan for sampling frequency. At a minimum, waste analysis is required within 60 days of land application events.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (7) from (B). Continue subtracting column (7) from column (8) following each application event.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
March 18, 1998
Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC, 28625
Subject: Application Records
Millstone Dairy, Facility #: 49-27
IredeIl County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
I received your application sheet. However, you should also have mailed the form
SLUR #2. Of the two sheets, this is the more important, since it outlines how much
nitrogen you are applying to a particular crop. If you do not have a current waste analysis,
use the value the technical specialist used in obtaining the manure/nitrogen produced by
the animals. Please provide the updated information of all waste applied by April 3, 1998.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
I.
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
�x
} ` Sincceerelyy,,
cam' C__ L
Alan D. John
Env. Specialist II
y
919 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28115
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 23, 1998
Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC, 28625
Subject: DWQ Animal Waste Operations
Site Inspection Report
Millstone Dairy, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Dear Mr. Riddle:
A site inspection of your facility was conducted on February 19, 1998 by Mr. Alan
Johnson of this Office. In general, the facility was in good shape. However, your waste
application records were not complete at the time of the inspection. Please mail a
complete record of all waste applications that have occurred since January I, 1998. The
records should be sent to Mr. Johnson by March 13, 1998.
The proposed construction of a fenceline feed bunker in the dry cow pasture
should not be a problem. However, to prevent confusion in the future you should add the
feed bunker to the certified farm plan. Because it is not required by the plan, the
improvement to the feeding area should not affect the time schedule of the current plan.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Johnson or me at [phone].
cc: Iredeli SWCD
,/ Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Regional Coordinator
AJ
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P. E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
$19 NORTH MAIN STREET, MOORESVII-Li. NORTH CAROLINA 2811S
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED110% POSTCONSUMER PAPER

Division of Soil and Water Conset nation❑ Other Agency s - , ,
Division of Water Qualityd� a3 i
Q Routine O Cam Taint O Follo%S°-u of D1Vt ins ectiott O hollow -u of DSWC review O Other
-� Date of Inspection �,. r.,
>Faeility Number �� ` � .
Time of Inspection r, :: ' 24 hr. (hh:mrn)
D Registered O Certified Q Applied for Permit 13Permitted 113Not0perational 11 Date Last Operated: .....................
Farm Nanre:....... ........ '.�::..... ...................... r.. County:....,...........................`..........................,.....................,..
Owner'Name: ............. ............................:.......r.'.;........�...:.............................. Phone No:.......................................................................................
Facility Contact: .......................... Title :........... ................. ........ 4........................... Phone No:................. ................
Mailing Address:........:, ........ . a. . ..........�......,............. ...... ..'7`��'....
..r..
Onsite Representative:...... ... .:.:t........ . .......
�it-.................... ...................... Integrator: ............. ..........................................
Certified Operator :........�......:!»............................. ...2....sa`..:...'t.:................................. Operator Certification Number :... �........... .... _.................
i.nention of Farm:
...........................................I......... ...:...................................
....-....,....:::..:.........:: ...:...........
............... ':......f:......: ° r.... ..... ...................
• '.L. i.r •'G v :� 1 • .... .... .................. .. ... ! • ..
Latitude �' �' 0 �` Longitude 0 • �� ��
Swine
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Laver
El\on-Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
10 Dairy — <=
❑ No -Dairy - - •"_
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
:.Nunifi& of Lagoons I Holding Ponds' J I0 Subsurface Drains Present �I❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System 71
General .
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? EbYes ❑ No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made9 ❑ Yes ❑ No
b, If discharge is observed, dict it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass .'a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
11 Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑,No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
❑ No
mai ntenance/improvement?
ti. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
❑-No
7/25/97 canif;"Flvd ,,,s I,nrL

Facility Numher: -
Use drawn sof faciitt to bhet p dttionuh a e
tter�ex lain stEuahnns. use ad p �
g y { i fiif s as nec.es.arv)
t.
- 8, Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed;'
❑ Yes
&No
,/7f1•f.F�:�..'�i�I '.t� {fxJeA S eht.1�`�Wlt�'i
Structures fl-ag_oons1folding Pends, Flush Pits eEcj
K
i
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
;Q No
Sitvctiire '1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure fi
Identifier: -,.....4:. '....:............ ............. ..... ..... ............................... ................. I.,............... ...................................
...................................
t
Reviewer/lnspector Name L}= a.1-
Hr-F1?...� r�,• t :�`
�iit` i. �'1 i{l
Freeboard{ft): ................-.,............... .................................... ................................... ................ ,.............. .,,....................... .,.............
,.,................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
'�D No
11, Is erosion. or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
..(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level maikers? .".
❑Yes
PNo
Waste :i`Lrplicaffr�n
14. is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
LI -No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop e ........'''1.;.. J.!t% �.. r .........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
O'No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
�[Q No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ErNo
19. Is there•a lack of--ailable waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
,0 No
20, Does facility require•a follow-up visit by same agency?
LEI Yes
No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative` -1
❑ Yes
El -No
22, Does record keeping need improvement?
0 Yes
For Certirted Or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
O'No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were ani=additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit'?
❑ Yes
No
t
M
0 No.violatiiins or de'fidencies,were-noted,during this. visit., You.will receive no further
correspondence about this.
Comments (refe'r to question #) Explain any 7i`ES ans;�ers andlor any reconvnendations or, any other comments
Use drawn sof faciitt to bhet p dttionuh a e
tter�ex lain stEuahnns. use ad p �
g y { i fiif s as nec.es.arv)
t.
1 •` 1 f ;e• 1 i l 1 �F
(4'57' C�'
�.
.�"•�o 7 l�`�• LS ��`'T �G1 i iCs Ilr �L �IYC`�.{S �-'-.- ; �t.�L'��iC-t ',t
,/7f1•f.F�:�..'�i�I '.t� {fxJeA S eht.1�`�Wlt�'i
�Olvk
K
i
7/25/97
t
Reviewer/lnspector Name L}= a.1-
Hr-F1?...� r�,• t :�`
�iit` i. �'1 i{l
. lr _ - r
Review •/Inspector Signature: ,-; !r ice; � :� � ,, Date:

1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAUL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 11, 1998
N.C. DVPT. nt*
NATURAL Rr%, URi.Es
FEB 25 1998
illYtSIO!i tIF lJti'I$!!1s>1fHTA1 ti`AdtiSLitFttT
K:o3f& &H BEit,'BNAI. Offfel
Subject: Request for Status Update
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
Millstone Dairy Farm
Facility Number: 49-27
Iredell County
In accordance with State Regulations (15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(l)(E)) adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission on February 1, 1993, the owner of the subject facility was required to submit a
Certification Form for the facility's animal waste management system by December 31, 1997.
This fetter is to advise you that this office has no record of having received the required Certification for
the subject facility. Please provide this office with an explanation as to why this Certification was not
submitted as required. This explanation must be received within 30 days following the receipt of this letter.
Any existing facility owner which did not submit the required certification by the deadline is no longer
deemed permitted to operate their animal waste management system. Therefore, if the certification was not
submitted as required and the facility is still in operation, this facility is being operated without a valid
permit. N.C.G.S. 143-215.6(b) allows the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources to take appropriate enforcement actions for this violation for as long as the violation continues.
As per Senate Bill 12.17, which was ratified on June 21, 1996, the Environmental Management
Commission (EMC) may enter into a special agreement with facilities that did not meet the December 31,
1997 deadline. These special agreements can only be issued to facility owners which signed up for assistance
with their local Soil and Water Conservation District Office by September 1, 1996 and which can
demonstrate that they made a good faith effort to meet the December 31, 1997 deadline. The special
agreement, if issued, would contain a specific schedule for the facility to follow to develop and/or implement
an approved animal waste management plan. Attached is an application for a special agreement between the
EMC and the subject facility. If you can demonstrate that this facility can meet the conditions for a special
agreement, you may send this request along with your explanation as to why the plan has not been developed
and implemented. This request would also be due within 30 days from receipt of this letter.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

A
Also attached is a form (Form RR 2198 that must be filled out if e facility is no longer in operation r i
(F ) th y p o s
below the threshold established inl5A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)(A). Facili des which maintain the number of animals
below certain thresholds are not required to be certified. These thresholds are:
100 head of cattle
75 horses
250 swine
1000 sheep
30,000 birds with a liquid system
PIease submit this form if the subject facility is not operating or is below the threshold limit established in 15A
NCAC 2H.0217(a)(1)(A).
Please submit all responses to this matter to the following address:
Attn: Shannon Langley
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh NC 27626-0535
Once your response is received, it will be evaluated in detail along with any supporting information that
you may wish to submit. Following this review, you will be advised of the results of the review and of any,
additional actions that must be taken to bring your facility into compliance.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you the responsibility or
liability for failure to comply with the requirement to develop and implement a certified animal waste
management plan by December 31, 1997. Please also be advised that the submittal of a request for a special
agreement does not assure that one will be issued. Each facility wiII be reviewed on a ease by case basis and
appropriate actions will be taken to bring each facility into compliance.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this issue. If you have any questions concerning this matter,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Shannon Langley of our staff at [phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard,
cc: Facility File — Nan -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
DWQ Regional Office
Shannon Langley
Central Files
P.C. Boa 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal [Opportunity Afrirmative Action Employer 50% recycledt]0% post -consumer paper

y
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources•
Mooresville Regional Office a
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor [DEEHNFZ
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
July 30, 1997
Mr. J. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28625
SUBJECT: Operation Review Corrective Action Recommendation
Millstone Dairy Farm
Facility No. 49-27,
Iredell County
Dear Mr. Riddle,
On July 23, an Operation Review was conducted of Millstone Dairy Farm, facility no. 49-27. This Review,
undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 OD, is one of two visits scheduled for all registered livestock
operations during the 1997 calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second site inspection.
During the Review, it was determined that waste was Ilial being discharged to the waters of the State, and
the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems were properly maintained and operated under
the responsible charge of a designated operator. However, the following management deficiencies were discovered
and noted for corrective action: failure to install start pumping marker within the ponds; operation needs to remove
heavy vegetation and a few small trees from pond banks. These management deficiencies need to be addressed and
corrected. You are encouraged to contact your certified technical specialist if additional assistance is needed.
During ensuing reviews, these same deficiencies will be re-examined to determine if corrective action was
implemented.
In order for your facility to remain in compliance with environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be
discharged into the waters of the State, and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems
must be properly maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
PIease remember that you are required to obtain and implement an approved animal waste management
plan by the end of this year. The plan must be certified by either a designated technical specialist or a professional
engineer. For additional assistance with the plan, please contact your local Soil and Water Conservation District
Office or local Cooperative Extension Service Office.
The Division of Soil and Water Conservation appreciates your cooperation with this Operation Review.
Please do not hesitate to call me at 704/663-1699 ext. 277 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
C: rman
nv' 1'Engineer I
919 North Main Street, -W 4 FAX [phone]
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115 N'N'WC An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 704-6633-1699 50% recycied / 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. J. Norman Riddle
July 30, 1997
Page 2
cc: Ireoll Soil and Water Conservation District
lan Johnson, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office
DSWC Regional Files

Facility Number r
Farm Mattis -Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
Certified [] Permitted
Dale of inspection
,rinie of Inspection ! i I : oz 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex: 1.25 for t hr IS min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not
lrU1teraflovaall Date Last Operated: ........ ........................................................................................................................................
Farm Name....... 11;.ilSf,�d3.�...... �,f J..•.iar.- f ......... 1'St�.................. ........... ..................... County: ........ -?-l.�.................................. ............... .......
OwnerName: ......... sl,,.. P.,t.Ma ........... k-tA.................................................. Phone No:......... �........G��,k:..................................,..
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title::............................................ ...... Phone No:.........-........................................
MailingAddress•..).. i.�............��.�.�....l�r..c�.�............................................. ........cs��:..��.........r.�'�...............,.................,
Onsite Representative:........d.Yw�.tz►t....S�aLas4.1�............ .................................... I......... Integrator:...,..................................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:.
Latitude • Longitude E_� • u ; 14
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cat le Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy I I!
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I J[] tion -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I, , , , , , , 'Number of Lagoons 1 Holding P, , ' L 'onds � ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 0 lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation!
17isehar e nri�iirated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharee is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. II'discharge is observed, slid it reach Surface Water" (If yes, notify DWQ)
4. if dischar;�e is observed. what is the estimated tlo%v in gal/min'?
J. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves. notify I)WQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
3. Does any part of the was -le management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4!30!97 mai ntenancetin-aprove ment'?
❑Yes�o
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
'e— .
❑ Yes X�1;o
❑ Yes ><No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ YeIXo
Continued an hack
i.e.iv...,. n.Zi:.ixe `..�:M �;a a` i �...n: .. ...� —... .,}. tet"
kj
#_
DSWC Anima! Feedlot Operation Review
�„„
,
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
(�l"
n
Routine O Complaint O Follow -uta of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DsWC review
Q lather
Facility Number r
Farm Mattis -Registered ❑ Applied for Permit
Certified [] Permitted
Dale of inspection
,rinie of Inspection ! i I : oz 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time fin fraction of hours
(ex: 1.25 for t hr IS min)) Spent on Review
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
113 Not
lrU1teraflovaall Date Last Operated: ........ ........................................................................................................................................
Farm Name....... 11;.ilSf,�d3.�...... �,f J..•.iar.- f ......... 1'St�.................. ........... ..................... County: ........ -?-l.�.................................. ............... .......
OwnerName: ......... sl,,.. P.,t.Ma ........... k-tA.................................................. Phone No:......... �........G��,k:..................................,..
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title::............................................ ...... Phone No:.........-........................................
MailingAddress•..).. i.�............��.�.�....l�r..c�.�............................................. ........cs��:..��.........r.�'�...............,.................,
Onsite Representative:........d.Yw�.tz►t....S�aLas4.1�............ .................................... I......... Integrator:...,..................................................................................
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:.
Latitude • Longitude E_� • u ; 14
Type of Operation
Swine
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cat le Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer Dairy I I!
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I J[] tion -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
I, , , , , , , 'Number of Lagoons 1 Holding P, , ' L 'onds � ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 0 lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation!
17isehar e nri�iirated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharee is observed. was the conveyance man-made?
b. II'discharge is observed, slid it reach Surface Water" (If yes, notify DWQ)
4. if dischar;�e is observed. what is the estimated tlo%v in gal/min'?
J. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves. notify I)WQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4, Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
3. Does any part of the was -le management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
4!30!97 mai ntenancetin-aprove ment'?
❑Yes�o
❑ Yeso
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes No
'e— .
❑ Yes X�1;o
❑ Yes ><No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ YeIXo
Continued an hack

Facility Number: — Z,
r� 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes I'o
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes)<No
Structures t Lagoons and/or Hoidins! Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Cl Yes VNO
e I
Freeboard (it): ....~...Struc}r� Structure
................
....... Straicture.3................Structute 4.............. Structure 5Structure G
........ w......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No
It. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ><No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Xyes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? Xyes ❑ No
Waste Apglicatiefn
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State notifyDW
15. Crop type...Gr.u............ ...................... I ........ .....Gs�;z�.... ..P' .......................................... ....................... - .............
�%; .......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
For Certified Facilities Onl
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes �<No
❑ Yes ><No
❑ Yes >10
❑ Yes )fo
❑ Yes 1�(No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
_
Reviewer/Inspector Name r�: t '. i.n�ivt r-�%t°a;J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature -
Date:
cc: Division of Water Quality, Waf(r Qu fllty' e oft, Facility Assessment Unit 4130197

' 8fate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
44alth and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman
James N. Riddle
1501 Cameron Dr
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
A FTWA
14
E:>EHNR
November 6, 1997
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation
N.C. DE:irr. or
PrN.VtRC)'+l4ii%2V7'. rtt•:,�r-'rte;
NATURAL Rr?'9O U[J (_x8
NOV 10 1997
WISIOq I1f #TiYIAFfiEiflii�f [Y , ��'E�'+
1104"-%"111 RMMIAt OFFICE
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission
on Agricultural Waste, was ratified by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996.
This bill required that a properly certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge for each
animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or
more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste
management system.
The deadline for designating an Operator in Charge for animal waste management systems
involving cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry was January 1, 1997. Because a training and
certification program was not yet available for these systems, you were allowed to apply for and
were issued a temporary animal waste management certificate from the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC). Because you applied for and were
issued a temporary certificate, you were allowed to be designated as the Operator in Charge of an
animal waste management system.
Your temporary certificate expires December 31, 1997, and is not renewable. Our records indicate
that you have not obtained a permanent animal waste management system operator certification. If
you intend to remain the Operator in Charge of the facility for which you were designated, you must
obtain a permanent animal waste management system operator certification of the appropriate type
before your temporary certification expires on December 31, 1997. To obtain a permanent
certification, you must be 18 years of age, complete ten hours of approved training, and pass an
examination. If you do not intend to remain the Operator in Charge, a properly certified animal
waste management system operator must be designated as Operator in Charge of the facility prior to
the expiration of your temporary certification.
This year's final training program for both Type A and Type B animal waste management systems
is scheduled for December 10 and 11, 1997, at the Hunt Horse Complex in Raleigh. If you would
like information about this training program, please contact your local cooperative extension agent
or call Dee Ann Cooper at 9191515-6968. For those enrolled in this training and registering with
Ms. Cooper prior to December 1, an exam will be offered at the Hunt Horse Complex on December
11, beginning at 1:00 pm.
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

In addition to the training and testing at the Hunt Horse Complex, examinations for permanent
certification will be offered on December 11, 1997, in Williamston, Kenansville, Raleigh
(Wake Tech), Wentworth, Salisbury and Morganton. This examination date will be the last
opportunity to obtain permanent certification before your temporary certification expires. If you
need additional information or have questions concerning the examinations for certification, please
call Beth Buffington at 919/733-0026. For additional information about other training
opportunities, please contact your local cooperative extension agent or call David Crouse at
919/515-7302.
Sincerely,
W.
Joseph B. McMinn, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Regional Office
Water Quality F1es
sharedfolder/bethlanimalwasteltempcettfollowup

G9,g
L661 L
R./ 3,7
j�jja D
7
_
r �,�9 y ro 7�
�°s a
e/7,14Ao
s� y
r°spy ��/

iSfate of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Mooresville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAD.,
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creels Rd.
Statesville, NC 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
[DEF.HNFR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FEBRUARY 10, 1997
Subject: Notice of Violation
Animal Operation Site Inspection
1 SA NCAC 2H.0217
Millstone Dairy Farm, Facility #: 49-27
Iredell County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Animal Operation Site Inspection report for the inspection conducted
by Mr. Alan Johnson of this Office at your dairy on February 7, 1997. The report should be self-
explanatory.
Mr. Johnson observed a discharge from your facility. He was informed that it was from the
milking parlor and was due to a blockage in the line to the lagoon. This discharge is a violation of
the deemed permitted status pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217.
It is requested that a written response be submitted to this office by February 26, 1997 indicating
the actions taken to correct the noted problem. Please address your response to Mr. Johnson.
Be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking
enforcement actions for this or any other violations. Also, be advised that North Carolina General
Statutes provide for penalties of up to $10,000 per day per violation for noncompliance with state
environmental laws and regulations.
919 North Main Street, y4.C FAX [phone]
Maaresville, North Carolina 28115 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Volce 704-663-1699 .,,, , 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Norman Riddle
February 12, 1997
Page Two
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either D. Rex
Gleason, Water Quality Regional supervisor, or Mr. Johnson at [phone].
rjeOvercash,
,
Lit.6
P. E.
Supervisor
cc: Iredell County Soil & Water Conservation District
Compliance/Enforcement File
AJ

1 DSW:C Anlmal:�F&,dlot Operation Rei
$xK;.
Q° Animal Feedlot Operratlon Slue
40 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other I
Facility Number
Farm Status: »».��. t3 ... ..» .. _. .....,
j Date of Inspection
ITime of Inspection v Use 24 hr. time
Total Time (in hours) Spent onReviery
or Inspection (includes travel and processing) I
Farm Name: »..! .V..S� rSL1�LA Y. Z.........! I�... ..............» ....»»............. County:.....'`.._ ........... ..........» ...
Owner Phone No:..__... �.3 c�.. »......
_.._.........
l%,iailing Address:.. f��P 3. �I ..... �r ...... �` ..... _..... .. l S.i� lam......... _.. ........ �. ...
OnsiteRepresentative........,.......1 ,t 1 ................................... Integrator: ............ ......... »............... ........... ................ ......................
Certified Operator:Operator Certification
Location of Farm:
Awe
Latitude 0 4 « Longitude C
rJ3 Not Operational Date Last Operated : .... ........ _........ _.............._..... .........C# C t _...,..l....��r»».....
X.
i
Type of Operation and Design Capacity fi 1(_T0"_'P7<1
Wean to Feeder U La er M a
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
Finish __ ❑ Other Type of Livestock
attrerof �Lgooas ! HoldisigPonds ' ` ❑ Subsurface Drams Present g
.T £�i/^'d Area
.7�1^�a,. 4o-aii �,'?xr'h
���k r ❑ Lagoon Area` ❑ Spray Fielt. ' <�
." .:.s,..r...>< o, n w•.€ s+. ar:..i. e.J + ,.-kako-. ,„.s _'' �„ fir
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d.. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
41-
[Z Yes ❑ No
.M Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continued on back

o.
is tactltty not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
F�
❑ Yes CaN&- ; 1
*7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 111197)?
❑ Yes
Wwo ' 4
8.
Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
RNo
Structures moons and/or Holding Ponds)
9.
Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
�."Yes
XNo
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
&No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
J$ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Yes
❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
❑ Yes
RNo
Waste ADDlication
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type .......... -_ near t, ......lrV.h
lb.
Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
For Certified Facilities 091A
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in arty way?_
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[3 Yes
❑ No
24.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments (refer to' guestioti #):- Ex lain any'.YES answers and/or any z. ramendattons or any other comments
Use drawings ofFacility to better'expI in situations 4use;addtttoaal pages as nei:eyy��ssa[ry)�F�
G '7 r �l?'" �11ejd14, S14t)LAA, X0 S©l 50Or'1
0.2) % pipe- Vrvm Mi0c:n5 i>a.rtAoV- i3 t(o5ginee�s �v doe re�,a�sr01i io ��
&�35 C.AC-r k'15 QYI& 'RAS ryvs i a p45V�-Xre. iM,5�eac5. 6�7 (Q�oci1:
is<<nap.�-Se-
eV1��rD�-Q:�ncLJ sfji�1wo� `rite._ ka Ott vleec� �a 6e��?ebL i1MSln�tn,
JJ rr r
tf/Z� `f cry tiS a V'O\� `yl CL+-+ria:ng ixedr
-� �rpus5 syske�w'. `}C-zs vteeleas A-e� kit-
Reviewer/Inspector Name
ie_
Reviewer/InspectorNante
Reviwer/Inspector Signature: Date:
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 141141
rh �zdt,. in v w ec r. RWTL,. ,. ani e�m�lti - z eJ. 4' . w_e_1 6 _ .�� G Ce_r�:�: �(f V ��av�r
ns '`` n
dr\C� 0. Gt'r r i e pU ul bq Z -.>Z
-- f

N.C. DEPT. OF--
�/� �^ SNVI3i6MMENT, [HEALTH ,
& NATURAL RESOURCES
_�.�-�..., -.._ �. ��-� vrr`/r- /UC' ------ - - -- - -- ----• -- ------ - FEB 2 8 1997
•--- --- -- - -- ---_ _ - _-..---._ ------ -- --- - -- ---- -� -- - - - - -- - F#OMAIl.I.E 1htiisds E OFFICE
_ —. _ .� _ 1� � G �.0 _ p Y C��•.?_r.� d /}_,o w ^� ��e_ �"Yo m 1!� �_ iY _ �f�•/�d_ . -- - - - - - - - - -
- - - --- %��- 4�ya •� _C B vc/,�y Q-ra,w sh y
I -
T�.�-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Steve W. Tedder, Chairman December 5, 1996
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Rd
Statesville NC 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
[DaHNF;Z
N.G. I)E PT. OF
ENVIit01 MT-',-' IT, FiF, .J.TB,
& NATURAL I;r'5l3U;tGES
Subject: Operator In Charge Designation DEC 17 1996
Facility: Millstone Dairy Farm
Facility ID #: 49-27
treciell County 91Y1S10H Of ENYiRQiitlE�lnE
".�"lAaEIiiEHT
hlogRISYUE RELIIAE 91HU
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly on June 21, 1996. This bill
requires that a certified operator be designated as the Operator in Charge by January 1, 1997, for each animal
waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle, 75 or more horses,
1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid animal waste management system. Our
records indicate that your facility is registered with the Division of Water Quality and meets the requirements
for designating an OIC.
A training and certification program is not yet available for animal waste management systems involving
cattle, horses, sheep, or poultry. Owners and operators of these systems will be issued temporary animal waste
management certificates by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
(WPCSOCC). The temporary certificates will expire December 31, 1997, and will not be renewed. To obtain
a permanent certification, you will be required to complete ten hours of training and pass an examination by
December 31, 1997. A training and certification program for operators of animal waste management systems
involving cattle, sheep, horses, and poultry is now being developed and should be available by the spring of
1997. The type of training and certification required for the operator of each system will be based on the nature
of the wastes to be treated and the treatment process(es) primarily used to treat the animal waste.
As the owner of an animal operation with an animal waste management system, you must designate an
Operator in Charge and must submit the enclosed designation forret to the WPCSOCC. If you do not intend to
operate your animal waste management system yourself, you must designate an employee or engage a contract
operator to be the Operator in Charge. The person designated as the Operator in Charge, whether yourself or
another person, must complete the enclosed application form for temporary certification as an animal waste
management system operator. Both the designation form and the application form must be completed and
returned by December 31, 1996.
If you have questions about the new requirements for animal waste management system operators, please call
Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt at 9191733-0026.
Sincerely,
/Z�J
�-� '� ,
FOR
Steve W. Tedder
Enclosures
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Files
Water Pollution Control System W��� Voice 919-733-0026 FAX [phone]
Operators Certification Commission NVf C An Equal Opporfunity/Atfirmattve Action Employer
P.O, Box 29535 Raleigh, NC 27626-0535 1 - - -, 50`li, recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James 8, Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Mr. Norman J. Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville, North Carolina 28677
Dear Mr. Riddle:
AdANNIft
OEHNR
Subject: Loss of Deemed Permitted Status
Notice of Violation
As per 15A NCAC 2H .0217(a)(1)
Millstone Dairy Farm
Iredell County, NC
Animal Operations in the State have been deemed permitted by the Division of
Environmental Management in accordance with Title I SA of the North Carolina Administrative
Code, 2H, Rule .0217. An individual nondischarge permit is not required if certain criteria are
met. A major requirement to be deemed permitted is that there must not be a discharge of �qy
wastewater. from the operation to the waters of the State.
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and notification that your animal operation has
been found discharging wastewater to the surface waters of the State and is, therefore, no longer
deemed permitted as a nondischarge facility under 15A NCAC 2H.0217. Therefore, the existing
wastewater treatment system serving your animal operation is currently being operated without a
permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
If you wish to be reconsidered for coverage by the deemed permitted provision of the
Rule, you must: 1) immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater; 2) make any modifications
needed to ensure there will be no future discharges; and 3) send in an approved animal waste
management plan by completing the attached certification form. This form and a copy of your
plan must be returned to:
Water Quality Section Planning Branch
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh. North Carolina 276264)535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5096 recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store,
treat and land apply your animal waste to the land in an environmentally acceptable manner. To
assist you in the development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is
acceptable, you should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water
Conservation District, the USDA Soil Conservation Service, or the North Carolina Cooperative
Extension Service.
If we have not received the requested certification within 60 days of receipt of this letter
or if there are additional discharges to the surface water, a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day
may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual nondischarge permit from the
Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and reporting requirements determined to
be necessary by the Division.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
D. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Mooresville Regional Office at
7041663-1699, or Dianne Williams Wilburn at 9191733-5083, extension 233.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Attachment
cc: D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
John Stephenson, County Soil and Water Conservation District
Iredell County Health Department
Ralston James, NC Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Planning Branch
Operations Branch

Site Requires Immediate AtMI on:
Facility No. Q"2
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATION'S SrM VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ,1995
Time:
Fsrm N=W0wner. f4le r M 441J ,
MailingAddress: //(C,;. S_Icw _s _'� _ S'd 7 7
County:
Integra w. Phone:
On Site Representative: ��"' 1f�//� - - Phone:
Physical Address1oocation: _ S �S ML a 5_ ►'�(rr i •'.t� �csa _ r
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM C cation Number: ACE. _DEM Certification Number: ACNEW_
Latitude: Longitude: �' " Elevation: -------Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste La have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 24 hour event
(approximately l Foot + 7 inch s) Yes or No Actual Freeboard:' y�Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoons} , es No Was any erosion observed? Yes Qr'0
Is adequate land available for spray? 161 or No Is the cover crop adequate? �* or No
Crop(s) being utilized: as
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwel
No
100 Feet from Wells? eobr No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Slue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes oN
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by mart -made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar masa-made devices: or No if Yes, Please Explain. op LA.+r�C
Docs the facility maintain adequate waste managen=t records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No k* fl4rn
Additional Counts: 6+15 AuiL'iy AAti _ ow, Apowet. jvkAu�_
3.01
Inspector NameM � a.�9Y � � � u�w b� Glaie�w ' � � ►�cu. -`° �
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
rrecvOZ
TOTAL P.02

BRANCH - WO Fax:919-?15-604$
Jul 20 '95 14:24 P.01/09
:r. r14 .fit, ntll'11
i117s W KII t 1'fON ki:t:pRS)
u�� �7y: �..._.•.._.� } 995
Own � 1.
t USi ,Sltc; �laode-,
� 0
Cifti:r4tat: �, a ��
AdJtrss: 4
r'.c Ilty N"„ u'v- — -- -
Tylu orop=r Ua• �Y/d�1^.c
L Aiia3.I* ,,,a -E
'._
3;rpn cr•' lnm>=ticrn; 07. fund
Fou 14 x' Ca dt:
,tiL.';;5�: :�lrLl�•t_"s�i] Gil �l:t; (/��{/j�
C;,—:34 Y� or r\io
I).= lbc ,4:(,i;rul WDSI—, L.jvCra hx,•41 nUMIC c=' ;; rla:t of t Foot =?5 yc;:,r ^•4 LCV tia.-) cY;:7(
( x,:xi rr:�ely Z Foct + 7 inc�t:c) Yes cln �►c;ual I'irc cast_ �: � �"t:=: �,, _ rr�-hn
V4r .' t:il+t{eu aa;Ch mart: ( atx JAgctC s_ vl=a Ware the c:cktct iAgoaas'
.cr:uticrtlt w.:nR.
%%I= Any >`ealfs�t o1,M"Oed.1a��t3{s',? �'e5 a ►� `s'Ar 0tem erasion
IS !: ��uCC::gnr! �Y�1�1�Ir roe 1"aoti F.pprlc+l:it:.. Yes t 10 k the =Yt:' cxp .d;rcate7 ci ri1
Additionni Cowmcats:
r
Fnx m 7 ; 5-3359 ,ii Syr,atu�Al
r.,er.• 1Gtt,-T `'...,rl-1."l—me; i".
i

YUL-14-k995 15:19 FROM DcM WRTER UURE-f tY 5LC71WN TO
Sitc Requires Immediate Attention: Me
Facility No. g "z
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI0I4S SITE VISITAT10N RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: -2 /0'*'
Fa = Na=/0wner. " �/' M Q•fc J jC,2Ji Pw .
Mailing Address: 4 ok/ Ctee k RcP 56(6 7e s ' %c Z. 8' 7 7
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: (" �e Phone:
Physical Addresul..ocation: nnG at ftki' ✓css
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle L- ,
Design Capacity: z.a�2 Number of Animals on Site: nh'd�k
DEM Certification Number: ACEDEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3S ' S Y o Longitude:) - 5 L ' 0 „ Elevation: meet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour s rm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: �t. T inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoons)?) es Dr No Was any emsion observed? Yes
U. T5
Is adequate land available for spray? � e or No Is :he cover crop adequate? (*or No
Crops) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?c)�e� No
100 Feet from Wells? j br No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 140 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes
k
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices`?�Ye or No If Yrs, Please Explain. o Ls.+tl�,'i
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No kW- leftewn
Additional Comments: 5 _ 44f ; 1_ Asa, o_� Zgppp -
spDf
Inspector Name Si tore bil W4fp� ��, f
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bili Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 11, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville NC 25677
Farm Number: 49 - 27
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
�•w
NCDENR
NORTm CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Millstone Dairy Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must apply for coverage
under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your farm has sixtLL601 days to submit the
attached application and all supporting documentation. In accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular
Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the
Department SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must be
returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required may also subject your
facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is operated following the due date of the
application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal Waste Management
Plan Certification Form. if any of the general or operation information listed is incorrect please make corrections as noted on
the application before returning the application package. The signed original application, one copy of the signed application,
two copies of a general location map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to
complete the application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone] extension 502 or Alan
Johnson with the Mooresville Regional Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
for Kerr . tevens -
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Mooresville Regional Office (w/o encl.)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 7, 2001
J. NORMAN RIDDLE
MILLSTONE DAIRY FARM
1163 SNOW CREEK ROAD
STATESVILLE NC 28677
4 • •
on
ENT
NCD I kM .
ESCES
NORTH CAROLIN Y MEN QF ;� ENVIRONMENT AND AL'RESOURiES
r
.JUN 1 2 2001
MATER QUALITY SECTION
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490027
Millstone Dairy Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
In accordance with your application received on January 18, 2001, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J. Norman Riddle, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG200000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Millstone Dairy Farm, located in Iredell County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 170 milking cows, 40 dry cows, 35 heifers, and 40 calves and
the application to land as specified in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP , and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance
with NCGS 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive
relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWC490027
Millstone Dairy Farm
Page 2
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding.
The subject farm is located in the Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact JR Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
Sincerely,
[Kerr
T. Stevens
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
IredellCounty Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File
NDPU Files
F1

RECF1
ED
MAY 3 Q 2090
! ✓ 74' Gva (PLA -c WAS r rYL r'.,�- . QUALI i Y SEC
harga C�,�plian,�'fl�
o I AC � �� J � - c � �. 11 SKY 71
j�W41-
14P'
Ise
Tq%
INK

UNITED STATES NATURAL RESOURCES 201 NATER STREET, RAI 103
DEPARTLNIENT OF CONSERVATION STATESVILLE, NC 25677
AGRICULTURE SERVICE PHONE: [phone] EXT 3
March 18, 1999
TO: Sonya Avant
Division of Nater Quality
SLTBJECT:.0200 Certification
Iredell County
Ent
In regard to certifications completed in Iredell County where certain items %were noted,
I would like to provide you with additional information.
The Sunrise Dairy farm was certified with a note about management for runoff
controls. See attached Ietter. My intent was to inform DWQ that management of the
runoff control measures was not beim used. Since Mrs. Campbell sent you the letter she
has reviewed this subject with the producer who rents her farm. She has told me he is
doing a better job of management.
At Millstone Dairy where the permit training was held, you have already seen the
amount of work that has been completed in regard to runoff controls. At present time,
however, the curb and fence have not been installed but can easily be completed when
landowner can get the time.
Please see the attached letter regarding Mountain View Dairy, Emergency spillway
and markers have been installed. Please note that certification of heifer lot runoff
controls was not needed until Mr. Souther returns heifers to this lot. At the present time
he is requesting cost share assistance to complete the work needed but until approved he
does not plan to stock animals in this lot.
I hope this information is helpful to you and the Division of Water Quality. As you
have seen, much work has been completed in Iredell County. Also the remaining work at
Millstone Dairy is very insignificant compared to what has been completed on his farm to
improve water quality.
Larry L Ilendrix
Y
District Conservationist
CC: Jacob Crandall
Harry Gibson

Anirlizi Waste Pia: C'r.-cificadon
:!ease ty a or print all tnfogn -Oon uhnc .-"Oes 00( rejutre n ii Tnaturu!
Existing or Year -or Exoanded__":(please circle one)
General Information: ;
--
Name or Facility No: `49 27
- arm: m i 1544 nom.• D,6 EU F-a�-rte _
owne.(5) Name: N or-rna ?i dd (c_ _ 1 o'1onz+`o,¢ 376 v 3%
Mailing Show Creek ko4GtlV.f C'- Z�1"Z5- 1 7..
Farm Locaiion: Counc-%• Far=., is located in:
Lar:tude and Longir_de: 35 Sof- q a 1 $Q SZ 00 Inieurawr: T~ ---
Please accach a coov et a Counts road map w;ch location idencified and describe beiow (Be spe,.:tic: road
riamnes. direr::ions. rm eposi. ex. �{.uy �i S lY �ra� 5' 44Qfv''1119_
Snow Cr..4t IFJ f I INZ "ry ar, 1-,,
Ooeratfon Descriotion:
Type of Sivire No. of Animals
3 Wean to Feeder
Z] Feeder to Finish
:nFarrow to Wean
zi Farrow to F:edtr
•J Farrow to Finish
Z, Gilts
J Boars
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type or, Carrie :Vo. of Animals
:3 Laver v' -j Dairy Xc-, h aft,
Z Puller .:.t Beef
/7D 1'1id t C -11—S, 30 art , ja 017 c s, 20 r,,Ai( 4C)4Zr1
Other Type of L'vesract Nu tuber of Anitnafs:
Acreage Available for .application: /51-7 - Required Acreage. 90
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds:—/ Total Capacir,: /off t7 Cubic Feet (ft3)/b .►r, a
.A.re subsurface drains present on the farm: YES' or i`IO (please circle one)
If YES: are subsurface drains present in the area'of the LAGOON or. SPR :Y FIELD (please circle one)
�%s zs a�%s aaM��s�:i�+N �h �+M.ie+K aY as r�Ya.ia�xMtxs�is;aa,�se a[r to st sl, aY�wi�:e atri�a�ay arra fire arae is+i�ia as y��MMn„Kkaena. it r,. sY +kMie rt it rare a�Kie is aim
Owner, ! Manager eTreement
I (we) verlfv that ail the move information is correct and will be updated Upon changing. I (eve; understand the opernt!on
and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste manaeentent plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. l (we) know that any expansion to he existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storaste system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Manaeement before the new animals are stocked. l (we) understand that there must be no discharge of
animal, -ante from rhe storage or application system to surface waters of the state either direcdv through a man-tztade
conveyance or from a storm event less severe than the 25 -,year. '_.hour storm and there must not be run-off from tate
application of animal waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be
minimiz_d using technical standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Ser ice. The approved plan :vial be
tiled at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and'Water Conservation District. I (-ve) know that env modification
MUSE be approved by a technical, specialist and submitted to the Soil and water Conservation District prior to
implementation. A cban;e in land ownership requires written notification to DEM or a new certification (if the approved
plan is changed) within ba days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Osvni
Signature:
Name of Ma. r u
Si, nature: AA
A WC -- .ku,:eye t. 1997
Date:

Technical Specialist -Certification
T `r
(. .aa a technical specialist dcs"tgnated by the `forth Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to Ian
NCAC 6i= .CC05. I certify that the animal waste management system for the farm named above has ant animal :waste
management pian that ;ne_s or excrzds standards and specifications of the Division of Eavironmentzl `Ianaze to t
(DENS as specified in 1JA NCAC 2H.0317 and the LSD?+ -Natural Resources Conservation Sen -ice UNRCS) antEer the
North Carolina Soil and Water Consenadon Commission pursuant to 13A NCAC 2H,0217 and IA ;ICAC 6i= .C.COt-
.005. Tae following elemems are included in the plan as applicable. Whiie each catesc;r, designates a technical specialist
who maw si?n each certification (SD. SI. WILT, RC. I? the tec::nicai specialist should only certify parts for :which the-.. ate
tec::nically competent
11. Certification' of Design
A,) Collection- Storaze. Treatment System
Ci'teck the appropriate pox
J Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storasze volume is atreyuate for operadon ' capacity storage ,caoabilir: ctznsistent wide waste utilization
requirements.
Z" yew, expanded or retrof tted -agility (SD)
animal waste storage and treatment structures. such as but not limited to collection systems. Iagcons and ponds.
have been desiened to meet or exceed the minimum standxds and specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist (PIease Print):
Milia
Address (Ag
Sisnature:
s0 VV%,40 C. a.
w.
Work CCompleted: 6J&197
Phone��-La7:: Z„
Date:
B) Land Anolication Site (W10P)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers): adequate amount of land :or waste utilizadon: chosen crop is
suitable for waste management: hydraulic and nutrient leading rates.
Name of Technical SpeCialist (Please Print): Lars— L. Yee Adel x
A>: riliacion u S DA - ?c *,c cc.s n Date Work Completed: 1/- 3- 9 F
Address (AQenev): •ZdI W<'t' or .ff �f �r ��/ N C .7$b 77 _ Phone \fj.: -$73- 674. —
Si -nature: z -�p Date:
C) Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate Gas
._l Facility without exterior to (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize LI:e run off of pollutants from Iounoing and heavv use areas have been designed in
accordance with technical standards developed by N -RCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Prim): 57amLkej C1 �q
iliation SDA- K SeYJ� ❑ate �Z'0 : o nple td: �
Address (AJen z $+. �,�Sf er ,���,"Phone No.: &Z-6 -249 ..55,4 z-
Sia:�st.:re:
--kWc - .#'uqu t I. tg.)7.

D-). Apolication and Handling, Eguinrnenc
f ,^:
yzl" - _;c g nr -; andi0g `1C:iiv w�ti t.Ci5ting waste nr rlirnt�uiliymgnt (WUP or l)
Animal was,- application equiomznt SCeci ietl in the plan has been either tieM calibrates) or evaluated in
accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as iecessar, to accomr.,odate t+'te
waste management plan: (existing application equipment can cover the area required by Jae plan at ;aces not to
esc_ed eid7e: die speckled hydraulic or numenE loading races. a schedule for timing of apciicxtions 'las be.1
es; abiished:.-equired buffe s can be maintained and c; libradori and adjus"menc guidani e :re c.:nuiined as pan or
t -tie plan).
...t `e`•v. ^ n ia, nr ':is .ng :Hcv _ i f e:-sr_nQ wage annficilinn a i.: .-nen sf)r : mv:. "1 i .n. (I)
Animal waste application tquipmenc specified in the pian has been designed to apply waste as necessary to
accommodate the *.vast,. management plan: (proposed application equipment can cover 4te area reoui.red by ale
plan at rates not to esce_d either the speci(ied hydraulic or autriem lcadins rates: a schedule for timing of
applications has been established::equired buffers can be maintained: calibration and ac us--ient e:uidanc: are
cu wined as part of die plan).
New. " , n iedor vd-qing - iiry '-vl ni4t•in .V d ? l'2 lS1n 'uRt'.^, o!nn{ irrentling tIt) f ; i.v
srntk- or
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been seiecte l to appy ;vasa as necessary :o
accommodate the waste management plan: (proposed application equipment can coyer the area required by the
plan at rates -not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or nutrient loading rates. a schedule for timing of
applications :as been established: required buffers can be maintained: calibration and adiusz-meat _guidance are
contained as part of the plan).
Name,of Technical Specialist (Please Print): La rrry L-4Lnd r`1 r,
Affiliation USDq -- NQ C 5 Date Work Comoleted: /Y-3/- 9S'
Address (A.en v):.Zb/ 1,Vk+,r S -f • �G vi AIC . .2P677 Phone iia x'7,3 -G 76 /
Signature: Date: /Z-&,-- 7k
E) Odor Control. Insect Control. Nfortality Manazement and Emergencv Action Plan (SD
E. WUP. RC or I)
The waste management plan for this facility includes a Waste Management Odor Control Checidist. an Insect
Control Chec/clisz. a Mortality Management Checklist and an Emergency action P±an. Sources of both odors and
insects have been evaluated with respect to this site and Best Manasament Practices to 1liniatize Odors and Best
Management Practices to Control Insects have been selected and included in the waste management plan. Both the
Nlortalicy NIariagement Plan and the Emergency action Nan are complete and can be implea meed by this facility.
Varve of Technical Specialist (Please Print): LArr L. //e',riJr .
Affiliation U $1)A - N c S DatL Work. Completed: 1/- 3 - 9�
Address (Ageicy): --Z6/ w c4.-- ,�'{ - S'�s'{� �� I N. C . -M-77 , Phone No : ?73 - C. 741
Sionature. Date:
F) Written Notice of New or Expanding Swine Farm /V//9
The foiio«-in- signature block is only to be used for new or expanding swine farms that begin construction after June
21. 1996. If the facility was built before June 31. 1996, when was it constructed or last
expanded
I (we) certify t,bac I (we) have attempted to contact by certified snail all adjoining property owners and all property owners
who own property located across a public road. street. or highway from this new or asoandinS swine farm. The notice was
in compliants with the requirements of vCGS 106-303. A copy of the notice and a list of the property owners notified is
attached.
Name of Land Owner: - -
Signature:
Da ce:
Name of titanager (ii lifter_ tt from tJw�,e:;:
Si;nature: Date:
AWC -- Au,vat t. 1997 3

T7r
A
A) Collection. Storage- Treatment Installation
`+e,x- e.0 ar tied or re!rolliued facility (SO
Animal -a;te storage and treatment structures. suet as but not limited to laecons and ponds. have bean ins=lled
in accordance with the approved plan to meet or emceed the minimum standards and speciifcaticns.
For existing facilities reit/tout rerrof s, no cerrifrcarivn :s tiecessar:�.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lctrr L.r-n r-iY.
Affiliation USDA - Mclura( Can.$. gry,'`.- Date Work Completed: t z - 31- 9Ir
Address (Aize:tcv):.Zat w,6-+-Sf • -f-'tw{csvi I(c N. c _ X77 Phone �;o�Of 73 -6 z
Signature: a .- - _ Du' ca: /x.-3/ - 9P
B) Land palica.tion Site (NVL"P)
Check tate appropriate bort
>,e The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan
:-1 Conditional :approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting: the cropping system
as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the owner has committed to establish the
vegetation as specified in the plan by (monthldaylvear); the proposed cover crop is
appropriate for compliance with the wasteudlizadon plan.
Z) Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as 'specined in rhe plan can not be established on newly cleared land within 30 days
of this certification. the owner ;tis committed to establish an interim crop for erosion control:
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): Lcarr y L. gr-,i4riX
Affiliation uSD/� - /V^&--+( Date Work Completed:
Address (Agency): Ac l i..od6e,- Sf.� ft�<r�%���; IVC, ezkG7-Phone Phone Ll o.: �7.?-(.7C/
Si,nature: aa1v�-,' Date: /r' 3 - f ?
This £ollowin- signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in M. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste utilization plan.
and if appropriate to establish the interim strop for erosion control. and will submit to DEM a verification of completion
from a Technical Specialist within 1j calendar days following the state specified in the conditional certification. I (we)
realize that'failure to subaii€ this verificadon is a violadon os the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an
crtforcement action from DEQ[.
dame of Land Owner:
Signature:
Date:
Marne of Manager (ii differ -n[ Cram ow ne*
Signature: Date:

C) Runoff ontrols frnm E.terit r Lots ('Zr C) '_44 4�1- a 1
Fac.i!i,� «:t, exte-icr Icte Co ��� �d
..1ethcds to mininvze the run orf of pellutant; from louncine and heZVv ust areas have as specified
in t5c :Ian.
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Fame of Technical Specialist (Please Print):ct r�- c� r'(Y,
Affiliation: U S TJ Q- 1i AILK—ed _ ee-S0Lir LCS Cons e_ru4Zl1r..` Servs C.t ^—
Address(Azehcv): 2,01 „W r,&. JrE ���_�as ><� A/,C, Phone No. -7a4-773- G76 /
SiS
D)
Check
Date -Ir- l6- oo
the appropriate block
Animal waFte application and bandline equipment specified in the pian is on sit= and ready for use; calibration
and adjusuneat mate: als have been provided to the ow•ne:s and are contained as par of the plan.
Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has oet been installed but the owner
has proposed leasing or third pang application and bas provided a signed cant. -act; equipment specified in the
contract asress with the requirements of the plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and
adjusi neat guidance have been provide: to the owners and are contained as par, of the plan.
J Conditional approval: Animd waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan'has been
purchased and will be on site and installed by (monthldaY/Year); there is adequate storage to
hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the
cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the
owners and are contained as pan of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(Aaencv): Phone No.:
Signature:
Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we; have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in rnv (our) waste management plan and will submit to DENT a verification of delivery and installation
frorn a Technical Specialist within l5 calendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. f
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management plats and will subject me
(us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
?Name of Land Owner:
Signature:_ Date:
Name of :Nfanager(if different from owner): - —
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Crtntrnt. insect Cnntrnf and Mortality Management r"SD. SI. 1117P RC or Tl
'Methods to control odors and insec!s as sozcif:ed in the Plan have be:t i installed and are operational. The
moraiity ntar.a_ _meant sys[_:7 as spec:tsed ifi the ?!an has :iso been :nstziied and is opt -:atonal.
Nan[e of Technical Speci:.t(i_t iP:.ase Print):
At•tiiiltion:
.a�i,irc4:f � __;[:: �• P'�t,re `o.
Sigh :tune Da[e:
�'�1't* .. •laauar. 1. 10.;
a 00H Ss

C) Runnrf Concrois rronr
w �.
�r. s,e Matt.�y rcvt(��iwPP�.; 3a0o'�ttn�t G1e'��/Jq r�ffrl/�dJ, hc.f►�
jee CIS++ �Q Q'fQ 30� bt �0c.a C�.uwP �iGr•�1 i/1 J7*`Ii� li1 'f�[c3`�� / ,
V
ForaafaLtli es wizrhout ex:erior wrs. rev c�r,i:1c nerve! a rtz_.ss.;r..
Name of Technical Specialist (Please ?lint): `4r•rae
i� A Iiar-on U SDq Na�Kr. Dale 4VCr*k Cono!e:ed:
address Wife, S7` • S Ole y; /Yc /I/. C. _ _ _P'IU,- NO .- f-7.4 -G 76 �
' Si?*.stur�: Ocv�.t 4f ot. n�'�'}c•-.L- - — -Der,:
vD) Auolicacion and Handling Eauioment installscipn (WILT or I)
Cfreck the w„oropric.e block
tZ knLmal waste accHcacion and handlins equipment s, a :-.tied in the pian is on site w.d r,�ady for use:
calibraLion and adjusmtcrtc .nate::als havd been prcvided w tl±e ou-ners :rad _re- curtained :a par, of tett plan.
J anirnai waste application and handling equipment spec:t4:d in tate plan ,7: nix be_:t in:iLV1c3 but rfteOwner
has proposed leasing or third party application and has pro-'ided a signed contract: equipment specified in
the contact agrees with the requirements of the plan: required buffers can br atainmined: calibration and
adjustment juidance (rave bean provided to the ow•t;ers and are contained as part oe the pl,in.
J Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment spCeif-trd in the plan has
bean purchased and will be on site and installed by (month/day vear% there ii adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the crapping system contained in the plant. and calibradoa and adjustment Quidanze have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Narne of Technical Specialist (Please Print):.— �r r _ L 17e,7drl jr
AfMadon. CSS A- IV P C Date Work Comclered: �z ,
Address (Ace n y):-ZO��L�r,- Sf { //� N.C. 77 Phone \o F73_676/
Signature: 0-^,L-. - — — — - Date:
The folio -vin- signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. 4//A
Y (we) cc.-dfy, that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling e-juipmenc as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of deliver, and installation
froth a Technical Specialist withia 15 calendar dates following the date specified in the conditional ctem icadon. i
(werealize chat failure to submit this verification is a viola dcn of the waste maragement pian and will subject me
(us) co an enforce—ment acion torn DE.M.
Name of L=d Owner:
Signature: Date:
Name of Mana;er (if different trona owner): _
Signature: Date:
E) Ddor Contrnl. Insect Control and N•tortality Manaament (SD. Si. WLT.. RC or t)
Met Cods to control odors and insets as specified in the, Plaut have been installed and are ope motional. -M--
mortality
hemortality ananase:nem syscern as specified in the Platt has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please P:inc): ZGrr L.11e i rix
A:tiiiacion U54,9- /V C S Date Nor- Comole:ed:
.Address (.Aj'!7 m'?O/ L�%a'�2r -• ffq'-�erI;Ile /V.. a PhCne 674!
S i tmacure
A%VC .;u4uar t. V)97

C) Runoff Control-sCram Exterior Lots (RC.)
F,Li'ity %vich `Ytirior lots
ill 1`3C _iafl. `((�P ra '4I � •-1` 1 / 3�%t7 OT1 •7Q.'1G�• /
[X CsJ �E C� 3d O1 �>� (pc.� C4rfj bG�.�/ i�fE4�lC10 to1 Gc���
Forfa�ii"Cies without ex:er:r)r ions, no cern r:cai on ne-- ssar.
Name of Technical Specialist (P!zase P. -int): _LGrr`y L. gendr1X
Affiliation a SDA - NG1Kre ( (r a/. Ae V; ck Date Work- Co•m4!e:ed:
Address (A?e tE
) PZd / (,te r- 5 � a e•fv: fie. N.C. PhoC,e No : 973 -6761
Sivnaturz:- _7+«-- ,. Date. /- S- S9
D) Armlication and Handling E uiotnent installation (WU.p or I)
C iec.0 the =opropriare bloce
tZC .animal waste apo•sication and handling couipment sEeciitrd in the pian is on site and ret+dy fcr use:
calibration and ad
.1 relate^ala have sera prodded ts3 the o«:.ers rd are c Ot isine l :ts prat of t132 rla. .
J .animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan !tas riot been installer[ but the otv.%,-
has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a siQ^.cd contact: equipment specified in
the contract agre_s with the re-quirements of cite plan: required buffers can be mainmijted: calibration and
adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and are conmined as part of the plan.
Z Conditional approval: Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has
been purchased and will be on site and installed by (monWdaylyear), there is adequate
storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed and until the waste can be land applied in
accordance with the cropping system contained in the plan: and calibration and adjustment guidanc_ have
been provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): i,t
Affiliation 05,DA- /VkPc 5 Date Wore Completed: iz -
_�.3-r-
ZsA �Sa7&73L796�/Address (Aaen y.U7Phone N:
Signature: Date:
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked. V14
X (we) certify that l (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling equipment as
specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of delivery and installation
from a Technical Specialist within 13 caiendar days following the date specified in the conditional certification. I
(we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the waste management pian and will subject me
(us) to an ea orcement action from DE.[.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature: Date:
Mame of Mana;er (if different from owner):
Signature: Date:
E) Odor Control. Insect Control and ti-iortality .Managgement fSD. SI.WUP. RC or I)
-Methods to control odors and insects as specified in the Elan have been installed and are open-itional. ine
mortality management system as specified in the Plan has also been installed and is operational.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
AftiiiaCiorl /VAC.5 _ Date Work Comale:ed:
Address (.Age:f v):a_ D! W�'l�r _ ��-tet�i�i� NC° Phone N07O'cl-7i-67�/
Si�rlacure Date:_
AtivC -- Audit 1. 1997

n'.z-,r ; �tur^ form to the Division of Nater Quality at the foliovving address:
i rp::rtment of c nvi: ot:rr.e ., :izslth, and :tiaEural Resources
Division Of `Yater Quality
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Bos 29:33
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
ylana;ement Plan to the local Soil and `dater Conservation District Office and to keep a copy
in your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- August 1. 1997

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality'
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
General Permit - Existing Animal Waste Operations
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections that are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Millstone Dairy Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: J. Norman Riddle
1.3 Mailing address: _1.163 Snow Creek_R-oad___
City, State: Statesville NC Zip: 28677
Telephone Number (include area code):_ [phone]
1.4 County where facility is located: Iredell
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a copy
of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): 115 north cross Snow Creek, 2nd Rd. to right. SR 1903
(Snow Creek Rd), first house on right.
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's I Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed):
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation:
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: 49__. __ (county number); 27 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Cattle operation
Dairy
250- Certified Design Capacity
See Attached Certificati6ri-Aihendrhenti-
Is the above information correct? =yes; ®no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility,
The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum number for which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of imals TyU2 of Poultry No. of Animals TyK of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to 'Wean (# sow) '0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder (# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No, of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 49-27 4

01
.�
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 151.7 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): 90
2.4 Number of lagoons/ storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES orPO
(please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited?
NA YES or NO (please circle one)
NA
What.was the date,that this facility's land application areas were sited? NA
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste.facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit application
for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components. Some of these components may not
have been required at the time the facility was certified but should be added to the
CAWMP far permitting purposes:
3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required NRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.14 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any,site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5128198 Page 2 of 4 49-27

..
Facility Number: 49 - 27
Facility Name: Millstone Dairy Farm
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
1, _ a. Norman Riddle (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for Millstone Dairy Farm (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to meX incomplete. m. - A ,
Signature
Date L r 0 ~
5. MANWUER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
I, Davl d Riddle - _ (Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application. for Millstone Da i t+y Farm (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned1a TAcomalete.
Signatu
Date 1-113,01
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD HE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 49-27 ' '

W.
Certification Amendment for Cattle Facilities
Millstone Dairy Farm
Facility Number 49--27 FacilityNzme J• Norman Riddle
Number of Animals Facility is Cenified for 250 Date of Certification
1/14/99
Please indicate the maximum number of animals that your animal waste management system is designed to
accommodate:
Dairy Milking
170
Dry cows
40
Heifers
35
Calves
40
Beef Brood Cows
Feeders
Stockers
TOTAL CONFPtiED ANIMALS
285 **
** If this total is equal to the number that your facility is certified for, you do not need to complete the rest of this
form. If the above total number of animals is different than your certified number but it is what your technical
specialist evaluated when your facility was certified, please have your technical specialist amend the certification by
completing the section below. If your facility was not previously evaluated and certified for the maximum design
capacity, you must have a technical specialist re -certify your facility. Your certification number should be the
maximum number of animals (cows, heifers, calves, etc.) that your animal waste management system can
accommodate.
Please use the space below to describe the operation.
The total number of animals have not changed. some animals
mostly pastured were thought not necessary to be included in
the orginal -cert~ification.
{ Amended Certification (only needed if the incorrect number of animals was previously certified).
By signing this you are certifying that the animal waste management system at this facility has been evaluated for
the maximum number of animals that it can appropriately accommodate; however, the original certification did not
correctly represent this number (shown above as Total Animal Number).
Farm ownerlapp . ant
2SSignature Date
Farm manager (i4plica e}
Signature Date % r-%©
Technical Specialist
Signature Date
Phone Number (7 a 73 " 6 7

RECEIVED
JAN I ZilUi
Non -Discharge PermjWng
Millstone Dairy Farm
J. Norman Riddle
Iredell. County, North Carolina
Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan
(0200 Certification Plan)
For a herd size of.
170 milk cows
40 dry cows
35 heifers
40 calves
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
January 2, 2001
0

s �UNr�
Fq R� 1100"!
�� �0 114,0010
pppO
o ;
1 �y� General Location Map
UTTLEMANS
HANNAHR0. z
ASCUS , URCHy ' �Z A
82 PH �
a
1 a� 4,. 1. KICK 4
rnyQ
02 F j873 w i ivr oAK RD,
3 CENTRAL
�lovc ' EL£M. G4 p0 2u m
FA RA A� RIDGE o�yN ILS
SG NT
Q� l ` O OI.D 71 C d a
J h
C +O y+
i
62
F 15
RIDGE G N L — S- — FIRE DIST o
74 ESTATE NOW - Rp � SNOW
04 E CREEK \ �° bo
LE R act 1904 E p:.'� 0
is75 1 K1NG
,an TA on v
I572
cc
BANGING
OQ a ioal
P �
Millstone Dairy Farm � pQQP\eh4-
4r
ti
o
RD
m r
�d ''
P'SGq� CM.
1371
1
m R
°s- "
MARTHA L`
.'gib N�, , , 9 ��
$
Z
�
►- , ��
aR/ Y T�A1L
oE• G�+ANs•
Rp
rn
.ate
d
�+ e��A"T'.
9 �
a
fq *fA��3f' ��A,�• WIN Y >ilf.L RD
£ JA OBS 0DR. SIMM
` i m
L
A�
CIR.
rn
RTER
pR4
BARRiWR oly�r
JONES BROOK DR
DKlN VA
VIE -ION
V�
Lk >
�� °v
LN, N 6
�.
•r.
:
DWq
4r
i.
RD
s
y
RED
p
�Q ,� �►
I a
a s I
RA1
/3 N
JEHOVAH S G000

•
u
Dairy Site Map
a
FA
Ac
s
13
ea/P Lot i A
LIV& byl/.
COW a&44 X
POLV
�c4 A
r
is
Millstone Dairy Farm
I Norman Riddle
Facility No. 4927

LJ
•
•
Nutrient Management Pian For Animal Waste Utilization
01-02-2001
This plan has been prepared for:
Millstone Dairy Farm
J. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625-2197
704-876-0396
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 28677
704-873-6761
Devel r Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
(� I Lzld�� W&� — 1 0-0
Signature (owner) Date
-O(
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: ' / a� D
Technics Specialist Signature Date
543665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Cover Page 1

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NC -CPA -1
Rev. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
I
Zips
Fara Boundary .
Field or Land Use Boundary
Field Acreage.
320 Ac:
Field Number
Privals Road
�• � � � � ^
Public Road
Buildings, housts .
r J
Perennial Slrsom .
Inisrmiilanl Stream .
^� r
Vegetative woterwmy
EXISTING PLANNED
• Fence
s When exlalinq fences are combined with other
symbols, they may be shown as follows:
Fence along both sides
of rood . --��— -�
Fenee along one side
Of dllch
Fence 10 be removed.
Ditch to be removed
r� T-11-2
Terrace . —
Rlverrionme. D -I D -2—«-
u The dots :,resen1 blocks; the arrows
T1;spills
Drainage ditch. _._. �._._ _ -•-
(Open drain)
Tile Drain . •--� -•—�- - a---� • �-
Dam and Reservoir. 1 C
Field Border. .----.— --•--•--
Firebreak . . —F--F—--F—=F
--
Spring and Trough. "N
Excavated Holding Pit,
Lagoon
Water Control
Structure
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

NATURAL RESOURCES CaNZ�LKJAI UN StRVICE
CONSERV'.MO PLA -Y 1iAP
ii
Millstone Dairy Farm
Owner Operator
{ County Iredell state NC Date 12-18-00
Approximate acres Approximate scale 1"=660'
Cooperatingwim Iredell Soil and Water E6 Colsservvabon Distric
~ " Plan identification Photo number
p
996
Assisted by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
FI Y
! i- �� �•, � 1' ` •.y.1�+./ tom" �4 Y1 ' ' - i � �r � e � =.,. s � ,�
' �•f�{•T � 8`ai�� � ; .. _ VVVV ��yy ... 4�ti• '"�D,r-"4 • , ' 4r j1 -1 ..t'' �o •" ;.i -• , v \\
s��'`�'64rr,, y.. t4 tr;, � e �; *` � k!•�-%� �4i��n �•'S !. i { • have ,5; wp'. 1'4. ! ^
t _fir' m=••... �r.'+Tk.... 1 4'ii �(���. _.��%� .� • . �t
..i,%�k`f'(. Q t •6 t!' 4"^ �f •• t•.h''�'� ya{, i '}�4' 1.'S� S. 1
is r ? �•, \ -'�y
R
6.V
IIJJff�yy�_i,s}` • t"�Y�- =Y`ya Gam. q.�
1ti. -•�"s �,�1� YS•.. � _.�^ •r •JS Y T� jI•.
ff r i ai��' ��ya i r '.a:�l a. • li �i 'T( �?F ,;wJ t •y.,1*�L �a���`: r �`�� 4 ��'/,.
1 1Aoy i 1L� R .[•
G ,rJ4°� a
tm
V
14
,T r �s�,,�r •
a
w
r
r-
a
w
r
r-

(loins sheet 131 (.tains shee` 1 '
IR DELL Co
(Jorns sheet 22)

r.
5
,
X03
�Jin`���/ \�I:\'�' `'\'.\��:1��1�'�S��:ti\�.`"�B•I`/I!.'L-';%"/(';"li;��:._�._� `l lidl� _� i�-` �✓-
)84
0.
> -I. YSTATESV/LLE WESTI
4855 IV SW
';('ALE 1:24000
L

. ...:':��" r c

0
pro
A
iLl
84
IK
.: : ,

IF
�i►�• • + ' •" to t/ � � _, F� -. � .� - � T

V1 VV
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
P°yE Control by USGS and USG&GS
7y
Topography by phokogrammetric methods from aerial photographs
taken 1965. Field checked 1969
Polyconic prosection. 1927 North American datum
10,000 -foot grid based on Nr,-ith Carolina coordinate system
1000 -meter Universal Tra• Ise Mercator grid ticks,
zone 17, shown in blue
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where
enerally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
MN_ low G
ON
3'
53 MI43 o•a2•
1 MIL
UTM GR{O AND 1969 MAGNETIC NORTH
OECONATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
THIS
FOR SALI
A FOLDER QESC

•
Narrative
Dairy Confinement waste are scraped from confinement areas, stored in a Waste Storage Pond and
spread as a slurry by tank spreading. The Heifer and Calf waste are handled as solids by collecting from
stalls, feeding areas and watering areas and spread broadcase on pasture and cropland.
These animals produce 13,142 lbs. of N that will be utilized by growing Corn for silage, Small Grain for
hay or silage and Tall Fescue Grass for hay and pasture.
There is not sufficient N produced from the animal waste to meet all the crop and forage nutrient needs.
Additional fertilization will be needed. Soil test and waste sample test results will be required to balance
out the additional nutrient needs for the.crops to be grown. They will also be needed to for agency.:
reviews.
All needed cropland, hayland and pastureland protection practices are established.
Cropland on Tracts 210 and 212 are striperopped with every other strip maintained in Tall Fescue Grass.
Crops strips and grass strips will be rotated every 2 to 4 years as needed to maintain a grass stand.
Support Information for Defined Sources
-_._.__......- ._
.................. -._._.......... �. _...
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001
Narrative Page 1

u
•
Support Information for Defined Sources
The dairy animals on this farm are not totally confined. Ajustments are made to establish a reliable
amount of animal waste collected and to combine all sources handled as a slurry and as a solid.
U1 - Dairy Milk Cows, Confined Dry Cows, and Bred Heifers - Slurry
The following calculations define the Dairy waste slurry produced per head, stored in the waste storage
pond and spread as a slurry on to cropland or grassland.
170 Dairy milk cows confined 80% of the time producing 7749 gal/head/year = 1,03,864 gals/year.
15 Dry cows and bred heifiers producing 7749 gal/head/year = 116,23 5 gals/year.
Additional liquid added for runoff from lots and paved area = 451,197 gal/year.
The total Dairy Waste Slurry produced is 1,621,096 gaWyear,
U2 - Calves, Heifers and Dry Cows - Solids
The following calculations define the Dairy waste solids collected from stalls, sheds, feeding areas and
waters and handled as solids.
20 Calves totally confined producing 4.1 tons/head/year = 82 tons/head/year.
20 Calves confined 75% of the time producing 4.1 tons/head/year = 61.5 tons/year.
30 Heifers confined 25% of the time producing 12 tons/head/year = 90 tons/year.
30 Dry Cows confined 25% of the time producing 17 tons/head/year = 127.5 tons/year.
The total Dairy Waste Solids produced is 361 tons/year.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Narrative Page 2

•
•
is
Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U2
Millstone Dairy Manure Solids waste generated 361.00 tons/year by a 100
animal Dairy Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1552
Incorporated
2058
Injected
N/A
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
Year l
4975
Year 2
4975
U1
Millstone Dairy Slurry waste generated 1,621,096 gals/year by a 185
animal Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 da s.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
11590
Incorporated
15805
Injected
17912
Irrigated
10537
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
32646
Year 2
33239
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
The following minimum criteria must be met in order for a plan to use a User Defined Source to determine
the total pounds of PAN in lieu of MRCS Standards:
I. Recommended standard procedures for collecting the waste samples to be analyzed must be followed.
2. The samples must be analyzed either at the NCDA Waste Analysis Laboratory or at a private lab. The
analysis reports must be available.
3. Records of annual volumes of lagoon liquid applied must be available.
4. A minimum of 3 years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volumes must be used
to determine the farm averages. A minimum of three samples (one per quarter with seasonal variation)
must be collected annually for analysis. For dairys with waste storage ponds, the minimum annual sample
number is two.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2041 Source Page L

•
•
S. Extreme sample analysis values should not be used to determine the averages. From the standards
database based on 1,403 data points, one statistical standard deviation from the mean deviates 48% for
swine lagoon liquid nitrogen. Therefore, any value used to calculate the 3 -year farm average N
concentration that lies outside of the range of the mean * or - 48% should not be used to calculate the farm
average.
If, at a minimum, these criteria have been met for the most recent 3 -year period, then the waste utilization
plan may be revised indicating a change in the total PAN on the farm as determined from site specific data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Source Page 2

•
The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of Nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning
period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Turd
Field
Source
I.D.
I Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period
Nitro� Comm.
PA Fed.
Nutriem Nutrieot
Read Applied
N N
Res.
(lbs1A)
N
Applic.
Method
Manure liquid Solid Liquid Solid
PA Manure Manure Manure Manure
Nutrient Applied Applied Applied Applied
Applied (acre) (erne) (Field) (Field)
1000
Ibs1A A tans 1000 eah tuns
210
I
U2
HIWASSEE
14.0
10.0
esaee Pasture
4.0
Tans
811-7131
133 0
0
Broad.
133 0.0 30.9 0.0 309.3
210
2
U2
HIWASSEE
15.0'
10.0
eacue Pasture
4.3
Tans
811-7131
142 0
0
Broad
142 0.0 33.0 0.0 495.3
210
3 ES
Ul
.HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
Silage18.7
Tons
2/15-6130
204 0
0
Broad
204 20.6 0.0 514.9 0.0
210
3 ES
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
mall Grain, Silage
8.5
Tans
9115-3131
94 0
0
Broad
94 9.5 0.0 237.3 0.0
210
30S
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
Meue Hay
4.3
Tons
811-7131
189 0
0
Broad
100 10.1 0.0 252.4 0.0
210
30S
U2
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
-4 Hay
4.3
Tons
811-7131
189 0
0
Broad
89 OA 20.7 0.0 S 17.4
211
1
Ul
CECII,
26.5
26.0
Sita
20.5
Tans
2115.6130
223 0
20
Broad
203 20.5 0.0 532.9 0.0
211
1
Ul
CECIL
26.5
26.0
mall 2E!t Sita
9.8
Tani
9115-3131
109 0
0
Broad
109 1 L0 0.0 286.1 0.0
211
2
Ul
CRCIL
35.0
35.0
eat, Grain
52.2
Bushels
911-3131
0 0
0
Broad
0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 WUT Page 1

0 0 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Trail
Source
I.A.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Arms
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applic.
Period '
Nitrogen
PA
Nutriad
Req'd
N
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient-
Applied
N
Res.
(lbs/A)
N
Applia
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid Liquid Solid
Manure Manure Manure
Applied Applied Applied
(acre) (Field) (Field)
Ibs1A
1000
VA
tars 1000 Is tons
211
Ul
CECIL
35.0
35.0
Manured,
36.5
Bushels
4/1-9/15
141
0
0
Broad
142
14.3
0.0 501.8 0.Q
kFid
ble C
212
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0
Sila
19.5
Tons
2115.6130
213
0
❑
Broad
213
21.5
❑.0 172.0 0.0.
212
Ut
CECIL
8.5
8.0
mall Grain, Sila
9.4
Tons
9/15-3/31
104
0
0
Broad
104
10.5
0.0 84.0 0.0
212
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0
escue Hay
4.3
Tau
8/t-7131
189
0
0
Broad
.199
19.1
0.0 152.6 0.0
212
2 ES
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0Silage
19.5
Tons
2/15m6/30
213
0
0
Broad
213
21.5
0.0 236.5 0.0
212
2 ES
Ul 1
CEClL
11.1
11.0re=scue
Grain, Sils
9.4
Tons
9115-3131
104
0
Q
Broad
104
10.5
0.0 115.5 0.0
212
2 OS
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0
Hay
4.3
Tau
8/1-7/31
189
0
0
Broad
1991
19.1
0.0 209.9 0.0
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons 3,296
Totai Produced, 1000 gallons 1,621
Balamm 1000 gallons -1675
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons 1,322
Total Produced, tons 361
tons -961
Notes: 1. In the trail column, symbol - means leased, otbawise, owned
2. Symbol • means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 WUT Page 2

0 0 0
Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Trad
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applin
Period
Nitrol
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
N
Comm.
Fat.
Nutrient
Applied
N
Res.
(!bs/A)
Applie.
N Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Ibs/A
liquid Solid
Manure Macrae
Applied Applied
(acre) (aae)
1000
RaVA tans
liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
1000 g2ls
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
tans
210
1
U2
HIWASSEE
14.0
10.0
escue Pasture
4.0
Tons
811-7131
133
0
0 Broad.
133
0.0 30.9.
0.0
309.3
210
2
U2
HIWASSEE
15.0
10.0
esaue Pasture
4.3
Tons
8/1-7/31
142
0
0 Broad
142
0.0 33.0
0.0
495.3
210
3 ES
UI
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
om, Silage,
18.7
Tons
2/15-6130
204
0
0 Broad
204
20.6 0.0
514.9
0.0
210
3 ES
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
mall Crain, Silage
8.5
Toes
9/15-3131
94
0
0 Broad.
94
9.5 0.0
237.3
0.0
210
30S.
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
escue Hay
4.3
Tans
8/1-7/31
189
0
0 Broad.
100
10.1 0.0
252.4
0.0
210
30S
U2
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
esaue 14BY
4.3
Tons
8/1-7131
189
0
0 Broad.
89
0.0 20.7
0.0
517.4
211
1
Ul
CECIL
26.5
26.0
mall Grain, Silage
9.8
Tans
9/15-3/31
0
0
0 Broad.
01
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
211
1
U1
CECIL
26.5
26.0
Matured,
37.4
Bushels 4/1-9/15
145
0
0 Broad
145
14.6 0.0
380.6
0.0
ble Crop
211
2
UI
CECIL
35.0
35.0
Grain .
52.2
Bushels 911-3/31
1 105
0
20 Broad.
85
-8.6 0.0
300.4
0.0
211
2
UI
CECIL
35.0
35.0
saw
20.0
Tans
2/15-6130
1 218
0
20 Broad.
198
20.0 0.0
699.6
0.0
212
1 ES
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0 1com
Silage
19.5
1 Tans
2!15.6130
213
01
0 Broad.
213
21.5 0.0
172.0
0.0
212
1 ES
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0 12mll
Grain, Silage
9.4
Tans
9/15-3/31
104
0
0 Broad
1041
10.5 0.0
84.0
0.0
212
10S,
U1
'CECU,
8.5
8.0
macre Iia
4.3
Tons
811-7/31
189
0
0 Broad.
1891
19.1 0.0
152.6
0.0
212
2 ES
U1
CECIL
11.1
11.0
Silagp
19.5
Tans
2115.6130
213
0
0 Broad
2131
21.5 0.01
236.5
0.0
212
2 ES
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0
mall Grauu 5ila
9.4
Tans
9/15-3131
104
0
0 Broad
104
10.5 0.0
115.5
0.0
212
20S
U1
CECIL
IIA
11.0
-cue Ha4.3
Tms
811-7131
189
0
0 Hroad
1891
19.1 0.0
209.9
0.0
Lagoon Liquids
Manure Solids
Total lied 1000 !lops
3,356
Total Produced, 1000 gallms 1,621 .
Balap 1000 Flaps 1735
Total Applied, tons 1
1,322
Total Produced, tans
361
Balan tans
-961
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol - mums leased, otherwise, owned
2. Symbol' mems user otteted data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 WUT Page 3

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,
this indicates that tate plan calls far the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available
storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume
of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste
utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name Millstone Dairy Slura
Designtorage Capacity (Days).
Start Date 1 11115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Ca ci (Days)
1
1
180
1
2
152
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
149
I
6
119
1
7
88
1
8
57
1
9,
157
1
10
180
1
II
150
1
12
119
2
I
88
2
2
60
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
149
2
6
119
2
7
8$
2
8
57
2
9
` 157
2
10
180
2
11
150
2
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month
.....
..........................._.......
...........---.............._._......_...........................
...
.................
_.._._...................................
-- ....- __ ._._.._..._.._._._ ....-.... --- - .....w._.............
543665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Capacity Page I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
0 1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either
owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly
apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly
dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a
landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use
of the land for waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
waste production facility to secure an update of the Nutrient Management
Plan when there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of application, receiving crop type, or available land.
3.
Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4.
Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per
year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre
per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5.
Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6.
When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will
be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7.
Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
__.._-.................... ............ -............ ._.__............__.
543665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Specification Page 1

method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
• ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be
applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
brealdng dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal. waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
5_ ..._ _._._....._........_._ ..._._._._...._-.......__._._ _ .........._-,..._..............
43665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Specification Page 2
I*

16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures, should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
i 11----- ........._.............._....._...._.__ _ _ _ _... _._ __.. _._._._......_.__._._._._._ .__ _._ _ __._......_.__ _._._.....__..._._._._............_._._._.........._.. _..._._._......._.._._._
S43b65 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Specification Page 3

metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and maintained for
optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis records shall be kept
for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application records shall
be maintained for a minimum of three years. Waste application records
for all other waste shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
- ....
___._.___...._.._...._._._._......_._.___._.......:
......._._............_.___..........._..._.__..._._....._._... ___.....__.._._.__... ._....__._._._.._....__._._.
Database Version. .. "ti Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Specification Page 4
I*

0 0 0
CATEGORY
EXAMPLES
ACTION
CONTACTS
Obvious Threat
Complete structural failure;
1. If there is any potential threat to life or
Sheriff-- 704878-3180
full or partial loss of a lagoon wail
property, contact 311 or Sheriffs Dept.
resulting in a release of waste
2. Report failure to Division of Water Quality
DWQ at 704-563-1699,
(DWQ) - provide operation name, location,
or Emergency Management at 704 -873 -
problem, time of spill, phone number for
5353
return calls & registration/certification
number
Local Contractor — Church Brothers Gra.
3. Make all attempts to stop the discharge and
793 Tomlin.Mill Rd.
contain the waste on the farm
704-876-1615
4. Contact the technical specialist who
Tech. Spec. -- 704873-6761, ext. 3
certified the lagoon
Impending Threat
Structural damage from
1. Report failure to DWQ - provide same
DWQ at 704-563-1699
overtopping; leakage or seepage
information as above
or Emergency Management at 704 -663 -
from base or sidewalls of lagoon;
1699
waste discharging from
underground tiles
Tech. Spec. — 704-873-6761, ext. 3
2. Make all attempts to stop the discharge;
Failure to immediately address
reinforce weak area of structure until a
Local Contractor — Church Brothers Gra.
these may result in complete
technical specialist can assess situation
704-876-1615
structural failure
Other Discharges
Runoff from spray fields, broken
1. If waste is leaving property use same
Same as for "Impending Threat' category
pipes, leaking pumps, discharges
contacts as for the previous category
from houses and other
maintenance deficiencies
2. Address maintenance deficiencies
Lack of Storage
Anticipated single storm events
1. Contact DWQ for regulatory approval for
DWQ at 704-663-1699
.Capacity
exceeding 25 yr.24 hr. frequency
emergency pumping
such as approaching hurricanes;
Or extended rainfall periods
resulting in waste water levels
above the start pump marker

F
i
Lagoon Overflow
Runoff From Waste
Leakage From Waste
Leakage From Base or
Application Field
Distribution System
Sidewall of Lagoon
* Add soil to berm to increase
" Immediately stop waste
* Stop recycle (flushing
* Dig a small well or ditch to
elevation of dam
application
system) pump
catch all seepage, put in
submersible pump, and pump
* Pump wastes to fields at an
* Create a temporary diversion
* Stop irrigation pump
back into lagoon
acceptable rate
or berm to contain the waste
on the field
* Close valves to eliminate
* If holes are caused by
* Stop all additional flow to the
further discharge
burrowing animals, trap or
lagoon (waterers)
* Incorporate waste to reduce
remove animals and fill holes
further runoff
* Separate pipes to create an
and compact with a clay type
* Call a pumping contractor
air gap and stop flow
soil
* Make sure no surface water
* Other holes may be likewise
is entering lagoon
temporarily plugged with clay
soil

-Dairy Farm Wade Management Odor Control Cheddid
Source Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specift Practices
Farmstead ® Dairy production Cr Vegetative or wooded buffers
G"Recommended best management practices
V*'Good judgment and common sense
Paved lots or barn . Wet manure -covered CK Scraye or flush daily
alley surfaces surfaces 2"Promote drying with proper ventilation
0' Routine checks and maintenance on waterers,
hydrants, pipes, stock tanks
Bedded areas ® Urine a Promote drying with proper ventilation
e Partial microbial 12rReplace wet or manure -covered bedding
decomposition
Manure dry stacks ® Partial microbial ® Provide liquid drainage for stored manure
decomposition
Storage tank or
® Partial microbial
®
Bottom or mid -level loading
basin surface
decomposition
®
Tank covers
e Mixing while filling
®
Basin surface mats of solids
• Agitation when emptying
®
Minimize lot runoff and liquid additions
®
Agitate only prior to manure removal
®
Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin
e Partial microbial
®
Liquid drainage from settled solids
surfaces
decomposition
O
Remove solids regularly
® Mixing while filling
• Agitation when emptying
Manure, slurry, or
® Agitation when spreading
O
Soil injection of slurry/sludges
sludge spreader
. Volatile gas emissions
t2r
Wash residual manure from spreader after use
outlets
t'
Proven biological additives or oxidants
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 1

Dairy Farm waste Kmagrrent odor Co*d cheddist
Source
Cause
BMPs to Minimize Odor _ Site Specific Practices
_
Uncovered manure,
• Volatile gas emissions while
❑
Soil injection of shu-ry/sludges
slurry, or sludge on
drying
©
Soil incorporation within 48 hours
field surfaces
Spread in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
0
-proven biological additives or oxidants
Flush tanks
• Agitation of recycled lagoon
0
Flush tank covers
liquid while tanks are filling
❑
Extend fill lines to near bottom of tanks with
anti -siphon vents
Outside drain • Agitation during wastewater ❑ Box covers
collection or junction conveyance
boxes
Lift stations • Agitation during sump tank C1 Sump tank covers
filling and drawdown A
End of drainpipes at • Agitation daring wastewater ❑ Extend discharge point of pipes underneath
lagoon conveyance lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces • Volatile gas emission. ❑ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
• Biological mixing
• Agitation
Irrigation sprinkler • High pressure agitation
nozzles . 'Wind drift
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 2
❑ Correct lagoon startup procedures
❑ Minimum surface area -to -volume ratio
0 Minimum agitation when pumping
❑ Mechanical aeration
❑ Proven biological additives
❑ Irrigate on dry days with little or no wind
❑ Minimum recommended operating procedure
❑ Pump intake near lagoon liquid surface
❑ Pump from second -stage lagoon '
❑ Flush residual manure from pipes at end of
slurry/sludge pumpings

Dairy Farm Waste Manu Odor Contrd Cheddid
Source_ Cause BMPs to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices _
Dead animals a Carcass decomposition Proper disposition of carcasses
Standing water . improper drainage %X Grade and landscape such that water drains away
around facilities • Microbial decomposition of from facilities
organic matter
Mud tracked onto . Poorly maintained access Farm -access road maintenance
public roads from roads
farm access
Additional Information:
Cattle Manure Management; .0200 Rude/BMP Packet
Dairy Educational Unit Manure Management System—Lake Wheeler Road Field Laboratory; EBAE 209-95
Lagoon Design and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
Management of Dairy Wastewater; EBAE 106-83
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE•Fact Sheet
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PRO 107, 1995 Conference Proceedings
AMOC - November 11, 1996, page 3
Available From:
NCSU, County Extension Center
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
NCSU—BAE
Florida Cooperative Extension

bisect ChecUst for A■kW
- Source - Cause - BMPs to Control Insects _ .. Site Specific Practices
Liouid Svstems
Flush gutters • Accumulation of solids ❑ Flush system is designed and operated'safficientiy
to remove accumulated solids from gutters as
designed
❑ Remove, bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge__
Lagoons and pits Crusted solids Maintain lagoons, settling basins and pits where
pest breeding is apparent to rvzinimize the crusting
of solids to a depth of no more than 6 to 8 inches
over more than 30 percent of surface
Excessive vegetative . Decaying vegetation Maintain vegetative control along banks of
growth lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter along
water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
Feeders
• feed spillage ;r Design, operate, and maintain feed sysiems
(e.g.. bunkers and troughs) to minimize the
accumulation of decaying wastage
yPr Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g., 7- to 10 -
day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day interval
during winter)
AM1C - November 11, 1996, page 1

b1ud Co" Chedd dforAnWW Opwifim
Source Cause
BMPs to Control Inserts Site Specific Practices
Feed storage + Accumulations of feed
Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
residues
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
ensuring drainage is away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture grain
products)
;' Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter st:r'ps around feed storage as needed
AninW holding areas • Accumulations of animal
PEhmmte low areas that trap moisture along fences
wastes and feed wastage
and other locations where waste accumulates and
. disturbance by animals is minimal
Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(Lc., inspect for and remove or break up
accumulated solids as needed
Dry manure handling Accumulations of animal
J;r Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g.,
systems wastes
7- to 10 -day interval during summer; 15- to 30 -day
interval during winter) where manure is loaded for
land application or disposal
>"Provide for adequate drainage around manure
stockpiles
ZY Inspect fur and remove or break up accumulated
wastes in filter strips around stockpiles and manure
handling areas as needed
For more information contact:
Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology, Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613.
AMIC - November 11, 1996, page 2

F_j
•
•
Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after
knowledge of the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing
stream or public body of water.
❑ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. I06-168.7
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design
approved by the Department of Agriculture
Pf .. _Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would
make possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering
human or animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be
attached)
December 18, 1996

PROJECT: WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OWNER: NORMAN RIDDLE
JOB CLASS. IV _
DAIRY SIZE: 170 MILK COWS
COUNTY: IREDELL
PLANNED BY: Larry Hendrix, District Conservationist
Jim Summers, District Soil Conservationist
John Stevenson, NCACP Soil Conservationist
Max Fowler, Environmental Engineer
Samuel C. Bingham, Civil Engineer
APPROVED BY
DATE
•

•
0
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Existing System Components and
Problems
Mr. Riddle has approximately 170 Milk Cows confined to
the freestall and feeding areas. Slurry manure is pushed
into a waste storage pond behind the freestall and feedlot
area. Part of runoff from freestall and feedlot area flows
into the pond. Part of runoff in old feedlot area is
flowing into lounging area.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service assisted in
design and construction of the existing waste storage pond
in 1982.
Milk cows have access to lounging area located behind
freestall and feedlot area. Part of the lounging area is
located in a drainageway.
Mr. Riddle indicated he bred milk cows heifers to beef
bulls. Also, milk cows are bred to beef bulls after a
couple of artificial insemination. failures. Due to using
beef bulls, dairy heifer numbers are lower than on: some
farms of similar size.
10 heifers day old to 200 lbs are kept in old freestall
barn near milking parlor.
20 heifers 200 to 400 lbs are housed in old freestall
barn and lot east of barn. Runoff enters waste storage
pond.
30 heifers 400 to 800 lbs are housed in pasture -lot
across driveway at milking parlor. Runoff from feed areas
are uncontrolled.
)(50 heifers 800 to 1,200 lbs are housed in pasture on
another farm.
..w . 4 : 1.5t.close7v..up ,br-ed.,.heifers and dry_ .cows .are :housed on old
feedlot and in old freestall barn located next to milk
parlor.
25 to 50 dry cows are confined on lot and pasture near
.the milk parlor. Runoff from feed area channelizes and
flows to stream without treatment.

•
•
•
II. waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Herd
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. A storage period of & months would be desirable to
allow flexibility in managing the application system to
prevent a discharge.
The manure will handled as a slurry in order to handle
the manure easily and in as concentrated volume as possible.
Irrigation will be used to empty the pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion _
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Channelized flow from lounging area, concrete feed
alleys and hay feed areas at dry cow and heifer groups will
be prevented. Filter areas will be established below
•-lounging-areas. These filter areas will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
Water on concrete feed alleys will be kept clean by
roofing. Manure will be contained on concrete feed alleys
by installing curbs.
D. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rates that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
E. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the.system. An operation plan will be prepared.

Try 6 months:
September through February Surface Runoff Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.57"* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 tuft.,:-_--.
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 =.12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 32,550 sq ft =_"13,318 cu ft
12"/ft
0
ili.
Waste 3c:orage
Pond for Manure, Polluted
Runoff and
Milking
Parlor Wash Water for Milk
Herd
A.
Design Volumes
1.
Normal Runoff
for 180 day
period
Use average runoff values
in Ag. Waste
Management Field
Manual.
Pipes or
concrete channels shall carry
25 yr - 24
hr runoff
to Waste
Storage Pond.
Drainage Area
= 32,550 sq
ft Surface =
25,050 sq ft
Unsurface =
7,500 sq ft
SURFACE _ _.. UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
% DEPTH
% DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50 1.85
20 0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56 2.16
25 0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55 2.48
24 1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56 1.88
25 0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57 2.20
23 0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60 2.51
27 1-.13 _
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60 2.82
26 1.22
4.3
AUG.
.4.83
61 2.95
31 1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66 2.52
32 1.22
3.2
OCT.
NOV.
3.44
2.95
62 2.,13
55 1.62
•30 1.03
25 0.74
2.4
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57 2.17
23 0.87
1.7
Try 6 months:
September through February Surface Runoff Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface Runoff Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 cuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.57"* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 tuft.,:-_--.
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 =.12.3 = 9.2" = 0.8 ft/6 month
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.91" * 32,550 sq ft =_"13,318 cu ft
12"/ft
0

•
•
0
n
4. Volume of waste
Dairy cows are in the freestall and feedlot area 80k of
the time. 80% of the manure produced will be collected in
the waste storage pond. The milk herd have access to a
lounging area.
Volume -170 cows * 14.0 gal/da * 1.80 days * 80k
7.48 gal/cu ft
45,818 cu ft
15 close up dry cows and bred heifers will fed in an area
that will scraped into waste storage pond. Cattle will be
on area about 10016 of the time.
Volume K 15 cows * 12 gal/day * 180 days * 100
7.48 gal/cu ft
= 4,332 cu ft
Total = 45,818 Cu ft + 4,332 cu ft = 50,150 cu ft X
5.
6.
25 yr --24 hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall =-5.5" = .5 ft
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
ii. Tank wash water
iii. Milk house floor wash water
iv. Cow wash water
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
12,032 cu ft
/00
300
Y 6Z
(, a/e,Gao Ibr
2,0400
100 gal./day
50 gal./day
300 gal./day
50 oral . /dav
500 gal./day
7..,, -Freeboard & Emergency Spillway t.from•plan)= 2 ft
B. Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
22,877
cu
ft
2.'
Unsurface Runoff
3,481
cu
ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
13,318
cu
ft
4.
Manure
50,150
cu
ft
5.
Milking Parlor Wash Water.
12,032
cu
ft
TOTAL
101,858
cu
ft
6.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8
ft
7.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5
ft
8.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
2.0
ft
Total
3.3
ft

•
f
•
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
146.51 X 157.41
3.31
wide 2.5:1
nar. 2.5:1
9.8'
81' X 105'
1.5:1
2.5:1
Volume = 9.8/6[81 X 105 + 130.OX 144.2 + 4(105.5 X 124.6)]
= 130,393
This pond has 6 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
22,877 + 3,481 + 50,150 + 12,032 + .81- X 146' X 157'
106,878 cu ft per 180 days
216,724 cu ft per 365 days
= 59.7 ac -in per year
= 1,621,000 gallons per year
= 540 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.51 + 2.01 + 13,318/(131' X 1421) 3.2' below top of dam
1.21 below Emer. Spill.
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 3.2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is 2.0 foot below the
top of dam.
This waste storage pond will store 6 months of manure
production. Each year an average of 59.7 ac -in will be
stored.
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed along calf
lot to ensure clean stays out of waste storage pond. The
District Conservationist will design all diversions.
Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour
storm.

Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Filter areas and Other Manure
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
these areas and lounging areas will be directed across well
maintained°grass sods:= Heavy use areas and lounging areas
will be located to provide the maximum grass filter
possible. Grass filter areas shall be at least 100' wide
below lounging areas. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.
•

L
J-- r - r
rNI
J
x 0.i
l � N
w
X u
u
f w
x
u
u
x +w w
CJ
vv
--
' XT
x l
l ` raw
oa' �
h l ri
Shop oaw
-'--
wr BuRding
• r }_
y V
=0 x \ W
x ` n u- Fe z
e l �
t � m7"' 1f to
+
to 000 ib Helfer Patsture-at zU
Partor C \
y P Lire- i U .a a
CU
VL G
CO U
r This practice as installed meets or exceeds `"' o t
yA.--all plates and specifications developed for
this job in accordance with USDA-NRCS__
d
stand
4r (name) (date) z
F, W
40 6 40 80 120 �
/ i Q
i;
Ori
REVI&oh
r�r rrrr

•
i
U. S. Department of Agric.,.cure �, NC -ENG -34
Soil Conservation Service September -1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAMS01-7
Landowner &MMi County T. -
Community or Group No. Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of dater to Top of Dam Ft. Length of Flood Pool �� Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam failure.
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
impr9vements from a sudden breach
i
Hazard Classification of Dam (a b, c) (see NEM -Part 520,21)
Dam Classification (I II, III, IV, V)
By
e
Y- l
Concurred By Q'J2;'
name (title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side,
0 2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date � Z 3 Aq ----
Date V---2
st: Elev.-:Est.
Elevat on
:
Kind of :Improvements:
of Breach
Reach:
Length: Width: Slope: Land Use ;
Improvements : Above :Floodwater Above
: Flood Plain:
Flood Plain
1 ;9w
z
.
3
. . : .
: ....
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
impr9vements from a sudden breach
i
Hazard Classification of Dam (a b, c) (see NEM -Part 520,21)
Dam Classification (I II, III, IV, V)
By
e
Y- l
Concurred By Q'J2;'
name (title)
NOTE: 1. Instructions on reverse side,
0 2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date � Z 3 Aq ----
Date V---2

•
ACLaC1'JllU,lL )
NORTH CAROLINA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM
FOR SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE USE ONLY
OFFICE OF STATE ARCHAEOLOGY/DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
1. SI'T'E NAME(S): Ary✓ r _ —,� 1 �eflie
2. INSTITUTION: SDA- C5
4. RECORDER:
5. PROTECT NAME: r,
STATE SITE NUMBER:
3. DATE RECORDED:
e►idr>x
Z6 Aq -7 z6/97
.fe",
`6. COUNTY: _ T�QAe { T. USGS QUAD MAP:
S. DIRECTIONS TO SITE: shave Cree ht ()e eadrs
9. DESCRIBE TOPOGRAPHY: 1�►�o
10. SOIL MAP UNIT: &lad/oaw
11. DESCRIBE YEGETATIONIVISIBII.TTY: _ _aJS &g-eoma/ C v
12. SITE DESCRIPTIONIDIM!�
ENSIONS: F 3, �,+�/[.b `, Sv -ec�
�.,
u t l fi. owe t
13. LIST ARTIFACTS: d
14. CULTURAL COMPONENTS: (check) 'PREHISTORIC: � 1,STORIC
15. OWNER ANDIOR TENANT; INFORMANT: yjrA4&A G/
ADDRESS: e k R J/R PS L! /t' r /1�- �t7 / 7
or
PHONE: ( O ¢) Wee -
> > > ATTACH PHOTOCOPY OF THE SECTION OF LISGS SHOWING SITE LOCATION < < <

40
;j., - Lq­g%
AT
Fb
I
0 A.
I

•
•
Millstone Dairy Farm
Iredell County, North Carolina
OPERATION
And
MAINTENANCE PLAN
(0200 Certification Plan)
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
January 2, 2001

•
•
•
OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM SKETCH
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER SYSTEM
3. AGITATION AND WASTE SPREADING
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. CONCRETE CURBING
6. VEGETATED DIVERSION
7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
9. HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION
10. GENERAL COMMENTS
F
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
9..
9

0 FARM SKETCH
•
OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
3

•
b�
OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
..,.yi..
.0200 Certification Pian
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
2, WASTE STORAGE POND
3. AGITATION AND APPICATION SYSTEM
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREA
6. CONCRETE CURBING
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
& FILTER AREA PLANTING
9. HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots into the WASTE STORAGE POND (WSP). Slurry waste
will be tanker spread from the Waste Storage Pond at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND
is designed to provide 180 days storage for the slurrywastes produced by 110 head milking herd and 15
freshing milk cows and heifers.
Contaminated runoff "I flow into the WASTE STORAGE POND. This structure is designed to
provide storage for runoff from the feedlot and waste water from the milk barn for a 180 day period and
provide storage space for the 25 year, 24 hour storm runoff from the feedlot and any watershed into the
pond.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the 25 year, 24 hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge
regulations.
Runoff from lounging areas is diverted through 100' of filter areas.
Manure at Heifer feed areas and Dry Cow Feed areas in pasture and
lots will also be collected and spread.
4

•
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff and wastewater from the milk barn for a 180
day period. Additional storage space is included to contain the 25 year, 24 hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A permanent
marker will need to be set indicating the level of storage available prior to infringing an the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity.
The maximuni storage level is 1.2 ft. below the emergency spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of
earthen dam and concrete push off for discharging contaminated water and manure into the structure.
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORGE POND will be determined by the level of management for the
entire system. Once the manure and bedding materials have reached the WASTE STORGAGE POND,
how effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE STORAGE POND. The
accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to a point,
which requires removal of the solids for many years IF adequate lot scraping and waste agitation is
maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of solids, which will
reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to the point that some form of dredging will
be required. If a large volume of solid waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation
is performed, this dredging operation could be required in a very short period of time.
MAINTENANCE..
The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
Vegetation on the dam should -.be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous
stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must
take place only when the soil on the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less
than 4 inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil &
Water Conservation District office. Any trees or woody growth should be removed by cutting and also
removing the stumps and smoothing to re-establish vegetation.

•
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
2. MILKING PARLOR AND FEED LOT WASTE WATER PIPES
OVERVIEW
The milking parlor waste water pipe consists of pipe from milking parlor to waste storage pond. The feed
lot runoff is collect by 18 inch PPC Smooth Wall pipe connected to a drop structure and discharged into
the waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect all component of the PIPING SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace
as needed with material meeting required specifications. Inspect for any material that could block pipes
daily.
3. AGITATION AND APPICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND AI'PICATION SYSTEM consists of a tractor PTO driven agitator/pump and
tank spreading for field application system for slurry or loader and spreader for solids. Waste is hauled to
application fields and spread.
OPERATION
Agitation and hauling will be initiated prior to the waste storage pond liquid level reaching the maximum
level marker. Slurry waste will not be applied in a manner to cause runoff or erosion or to frozen or
saturated soils.
Maintenance
.- Fields that receive waste application should-1ave soil tested annually. Soil test along with waste.sample
testing can be used to plan nutrient needs for fiiture crops and to monitor the soil nutrient levels. .
•
6

•
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
Clean water collection and piping consist of piping clean water under stock trails and diverting clean
water around lounging and feedlot areas.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the components of the CLEAN .WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM annually for
cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace as needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated
sediment.
5. CONCRETE CURBING
OVERVIEW
The CONCRETE CURBING constructed on the lot will prevent contaminated liquids from entering the
stream in any storm less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
MAINTENACE
The concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks
b. VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
VEGETATED DIVERSION located above the waste storage pond will convey non -contaminated runoff
around the structure.
MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the DIVERSION should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within
the DIVERSION. The DIVERSION should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The
DIVERSION may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place
only when the soils are dry, Vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than 4 inches.
If sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation
District for technical assistance in correcting this problem. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further
maintenance requirements.

•
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION has been installed at locations as indicated on the plan maps
According to MRCS standard 382 (Fencing)
MAINTENANCE
Inspect.the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot. If fencing wire -
becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence post are rotted or damage in any way,
replace damaged posts with a post, which meets the original specifications.
S. _ FILTER AREA_PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 100 feet of grass below the lounging areas and seeding
diversions.
MAINTENANCE
Soil samples should be taken at least once per year to determine fertilizer and lime recommendations.
Fertilizer and lime should be applied either during September -October or February -March. Vegetation
should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. The filter area may
be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place only when the soils
are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than 4 inches. All FILTER
AREAPLANTING should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations
must take place only when the soil is dry and vegetation should not be mowed to height of less than4
inches at any time. Do not mow cool season grasses during periods when plants are showing signs of
drought stress.
0 a

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
OVERVIEW
The HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION is around the feeding barn as calves, heifers and dry cows
gather in from adjoining lots and pasture.
MAWTENANCE
Inspect the HEAVY USE AREAS periodically for damage and wear. If gravel layer becomes thin, gravel
d shall be replaced to maintain a minimum of 4 inches of cover over the filter cloth. Manure accumulations
on edges and adjacent to concrete should be removed at regular intervals to maintain drainage away from
HEAVY USE AREAS.
10, GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation; especially that of
the filter area, diversion and dam, is not adversely affected. It is a violation of the law to use any pesticide
in a manner not permitted by its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a manner or
for a purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the pesticide product that
you purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of protective clothing and including containers,
SAFETY
Waste storage ponds dangerous to' people and animals as they commonly have a crust on the surface
making them look solid. Push off ramp is especially dangerous due to height and slick conditions. Ramp
restrains and fencing should be inspected and repairs needed be made immediately. All employees and
visitors should be made aware of the dangers.
REPAIRS
W Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major modifications are required for
any of the components of the Waste Management Plan
f 9

Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation shall be maintained between water supply wells and any
lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field..
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified_in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish.to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Mooresville Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional infortnation concerning
this COC or the General Permit; please contact Michelle Barnett at [phone] ext. 544.
Sincerely,
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit AWG200000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Iredell County Health Department
lredell`County Soil and Water'Conservation-District------ --
Permit File AWC4490027
NDPU Files
NC DEPT. OF E1tIWliQNMEW
AND N4TUM RE80t1RCEs
tMMSVILIA F450 OVAL OFFICE
r} s
WAY 19 2003
001
WTOQUAMSECTION

OF wArFq Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
May 1, 2003
J. Norman Riddle
Millstone Dairy Farm
1163 Snow Creek Road
Statesville NC 28625
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWC490027
Millstone Dairy Farm
Cattle Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Iredell County
Dear J. Norman Riddle:
On April 28, 2003, the North Carolina General Assembly ratified Senate Bill 733 which directs the
Division of Water Quality (Division) to extend the expiration date of the Cattle -Waste Operation General
Permit AWG200000. Therefore, the General Permit has been re -issued by the Division to extend the
expiration date to October 1, 2004. During the period of this extension the Division will be working with
all interested parties on the development of a new version of the Non -Discharge General Permit.
In accordance with your application received on February 14, 2003 and in accordance with the directive
of Senate Bill 733, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to J.
Norman Riddle, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste collection, treatment, storage and
land application system in accordance with General Permit AWG200000. The issuance of this COC
supercedes and terminates your previous COC Number AWC490027 which expired on April 30, 2003.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
.of animal waste from the Millstone Dairy Farm, located in hr -dell County,. withananimal capacity of -no
greater than an annual average of 170 Dairy, 60 Heifer, 40 Dry, 15 Heifer/Dry cattle and the application
to land as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until October 1, 2004. Pursuant to this COC, you
are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for.collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must 'be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.VM
'
wENOR
Non -Discharge Permitting Unfit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJlh2o.enr.state,nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
01-02-2001
This plan has been prepared for:
Millstone Dairy Farm
J. Norman Riddle
1163 Snow Creek Rd.
Statesville, NC 28625-2197
704-876-0396
This plan has been developed by:
C. Lipe Barrier, Jr.
DSWC
Iredell SWCD
201 Water Street
Statesville, NC 18677
704-873-6761 ,
Develo Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste
utilization plan for the farm named above. I•have read and understand the Required
Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with this plan.
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted
by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: L' ,Zo a e
TechniCIZSp0CiaIiSt Signature Date
543665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02 2001 Cover Page 1
t,:

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan, Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity,
this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available
storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume
of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste
utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name Millstone Dairy Slurr
y
Deaign Storage Capaciq (Days)
Start Date 11115
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)-*
1
1
180
1
2
152
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
149
1
6
119
1
7
88
1
8
57
1
9
157
1
10
180
1
11
150
1
12
119
2
1
88
2
2
60
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
149
2
6
119
2
7
88
2
8
57
2
9
157
2
10
180
2
11
150
2
12
119
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month,
543665 Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Capacity Page 1

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Existing System Components and
Problems
Mr. Riddle has approximately 170 Milk Cows confined to
the freestall and feeding areas. Slurry manure is pushed
into a waste storage pond behind the freestall and feedlot
area. Part of runoff from freestall and feedlot area flows
into the pond. Part of runoff in old feedlot area is
flowing into lounging area.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service assisted in
design and construction of the existing waste storage pond
in 1582.
Milk cows have access to lounging area located behind
freestall and feedlot area. Part of the lounging area is
located in a drainageway.
Mr. Riddle indicated he bred milk cows heifers to beef
bulls. Also, milk cows are bred to beef bulls after a
couple of artificial insemination failures. Due to using
beef bulls, dairy heifer numbers are lower than on some
farms of similar size. _
10 heifers day old to 200 lbs are kept in old freestall
barn near milking parlor.
20 heifers 200 to 400 lbs are housed in old freestall
barn and lot east of barn. Runoff enters waste storage
pond.
30 heifers 400 to 800 lbs are housed in pasture -lot
across driveway at milking parlor. Runoff from feed areas
are uncontrolled.
}C50 heifers 800 to 1,200 lbs are housed in pasture on
another farm.
15 close.up.bred:heifers and dry cows are housedon old,.
feedlot and in old freestall barn located next to milk
parlor.
25 to 50 dry cows are confined on lot and pasture near
the milk parlor. Runoff from feed area channelizes and
flows to stream without treatment.

II. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically as possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Herd
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. A storage period of 6 months would be desirable to
allow flexibility in managing the application system to
prevent a discharge.
The manure will handled as a slurry in order to handle
the manure easily and in as concentrated volume as possible.
Irrigation will be used to empty the pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Channelized flow from lounging area, concrete feed
alleys and hay feed areas at dry cow and heifer groups will
be prevented. Filter areas will be established below
lounging -areas. These filter areas will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
Water on concrete feed alleys will be kept clean by
roofing. Manure will be contained on concrete feed alleys
by installing curbs.
D. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rate's that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
E. Operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will'be prepared.

na6ce SL:orage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Herd
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 1.80 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual. Pipes or concrete channels shall carry 25 yr - 24
hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond.
Drainage Area = 32,550 sq ft Surface = 25,050 sq ft
Unsurface = 7,500 sq ft
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 cu£t
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.5711* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 tuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.'8 ft/6 month
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.9111 * 32,550 sq ft = 13,31.8 cu ft
12"/ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
%
DEPTH
%
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1..88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1-.13
_ 4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
.30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2. 95
55
1..62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 6
months:
September through
February
Surface
Runoff
Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.4511* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 cu£t
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.5711* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 tuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus evaporation on pond surface
21.57 - 12.3 = 9.2"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.'8 ft/6 month
25yr-24hr runoff= 4.9111 * 32,550 sq ft = 13,31.8 cu ft
12"/ft

Dairy cows are in the freestall and feedlot area 80t of
the time. 80% of the manure produced will be collected in
the waste storage pond. The milk herd have access to a
lounging area.
Volume =170 cows * 14.0 gal/day 180 days * 80%-
7.48 gal/cu ft
45,818 cu ft
15 close up dry cows and bred heifers will fed in an area
that will scraped.into waste storage pond. Cattle will be
on area about loot of the time.
Volume = 15 cows * 12oral/dav * 180 days * 100
7.48 gal/cu ft
4,332 cu ft
Total = 45,818 cu ft + 4,332 cu ft = 50,150 cu ft A% ,2f yr
I�
6.
25 yr -24 hr rainfall on the pond surface
Rainfall ='5.5" - .5 £t
Milking Parlor Wash Water
i. Pipeline and milker wash water
ii. Tank wash water
iii. Milk house floor wash water
iv. Cow wash water
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
12,032 cu ft
�oa�3�a
x 6z
Z aaa
e
100 gal./day
50. gal./day
300 gal./day
50 aal./dav
500 gal.. /day
7.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
(from plan)= 2 ft
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
22,877
cu ft
2.
Unsurface Runoff
3,481
cu ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
13,318
cu ft
4.
Manure
50,150
Cu ft
5.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
12,03-2
cu ft
TOTAL
101,858
cu ft
6.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8
ft
7.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5
ft
S.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
2.0
ft
Total
3.3
ft

I
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
wide 2.5:1
nar. 2.5:1
146.5' X 157.4'
3.3'
9.8'
81.' X 105'
1.5:1
2.5:1
Volume = 9.8/6[81 X 105 + 130.OX 144.2 + 4(105.5 X 124.6)]
= 130,393
This pond has 6 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
22,877 + 3,481 + 50,150 + 12,032 + .8' X 1.46' X 157'
= 106,878 cu ft per 180 days
= 216,724 cu ft per 365 days
= 59.7 ac -in per year
= 1,621,000 gallons per year
= 540 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 2.0' + 13,318/(131' X 142') = 3.2' below top of dam
= 1.2' below Emer. Spill.
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 3.2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is 2.0 foot below the
top of dam.
This waste storage pond will store 6 months of manure
production. Each year an average of 59.7 ac -in will be
stored. '
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed along calf
lot to ensure clean stays out of waste storage pond. The
District Conservationist will design all diversions.
Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour
storm.

Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Filter areas and Other Manure
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
these areas and lounging areas will be directed across well
maintained grass sods. Heavy use areas and lounging areas
will be located to provide the maximum grass filter
possible. Grass filter areas shall be at least 100' wide
below lounging areas. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.
0

WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
I. Waste Management Existing System Components and
Problems
Mr. Riddle has approximately 170 Milk Cows confined to
the freestall and feeding areas. Slurry manure is pushed
into a waste storage pond behind the freestall and feedlot
area. Part of runoff from freestall and feedlot area flows
into the pond. Part of runoff in old feedlot area is
flowing into lounging area.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service assisted in
design and construction of the existing waste storage pond
in 1982.
Milk cows have access to lounging area located behind
freestall and feedlot area. Part of the lounging area is
located in a drainageway.
Mr. Riddle indicated he bred milk cows heifers to beef
bulls. Also, milk cows are bred to beef bulls after a
couple of artificial insemination failures. Due to using
beef bulls, dairy heifer numbers are lower than on some
farms of similar size.
10 heifers day old to 200 lbs are kept in old freestall
barn near milking parlor.
20 heifers 200 to 400 lbs are housed in old freestall
barn and lot east of barn. Runoff enters waste storage
pond.
30 heifers 400 to 800 lbs are housed in pasture -lot
across driveway at milking parlor. Runoff from feed areas
are uncontrolled.
X'50 heifers 800 to 1,200 lbs are housed in pasture on
another farm.
15 close up bred heifers and dry cows are housed.on old
feedlot and in old freestall barn located next to milk
parlor.
25 to 50 dry cows are confined on lot and pasture near
the milk parlor. Runoff from feed area channelizes and
flows to stream without treatment.

Ii. Waste Management Objective
A system will be planned to economically As possible
handle all the problems described above in a manner that
does not degrade air, soil or water resources. The system
planned will prevent discharge of pollutants to surface and
ground water by recycling waste through soil and plants.
The following design and plans will be required:
A. Waste Storage Pond for Manure, Polluted Runoff and
Milking Parlor Wash Water for Milk Herd
The storage period will be determined in the existing
pond. A storage period of 6 months would be desirable to
allow flexibility in managing the application system to
prevent a discharge.
The manure will handled as a slurry in order to handle
the manure easily and in as concentrated volume as possible.
Irrigation will be used to empty the pond.
B. Clean Water Exclusion
Clean water will be excluded from the feedlot and waste
storage ponds to the fullest extent possible. Diversions,
piping, and guttering will be used where practical.
C. Livestock Exclusion And Filter Areas
Channelized flow from Lounging area, concrete feed
alleys and hay feed areas at dry cow and heifer groups will
be prevented. Filter areae will be established below
lounging -areas. These filter areas will infiltrate part of
the first flush and filter sediment and organic particles.
Water on concrete feed alleys will be kept clean by
roofing. Manure will be contained on concrete feed alleys
by installing curbs.
D. Waste Utilization
Sufficient land shall be available to properly spread
waste at locations, times, volumes, and rate's that maintains
air, soil and water resources. Waste applications will be
based on soil and waste analysis. A waste utilization plan
will be prepared.
E. operation and Maintenance
The owner shall be responsible for operating and
maintaining the system. An operation plan will be prepared.

i 1 rVG6i" e S�orage Pond for Manure, -Polluted Runoff and
Milking. - Parlor ' Wash Water for Milk Herd
A. Design Volumes
1. Normal Runoff for 180 day period
Use average runoff values in Ag. Waste Management Field
Manual. Pipes or concrete channels shall carry 25 yr - 24
hr runoff to Waste Storage Pond.
Drainage Area = 32,550 sq ft Surface = 25,050 sq ft
Unsurface = 7,500 sq ft
Surface Runoff= 12.45"* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.57"* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus Evaporation on pond surface
21..57 - 12.3 = 9.2"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.'8 ft/6 month
25yr-24hr runoff= 4,911" * 32,550 sq ft = 13,318 cu ft
12"/ft
SURFACE
UNSURFACE
NORMAL
RUNOFF
RUNOFF
MONTH
RAINFALL
DEPTH
t
DEPTH
NORMAL EVAP.
JAN.
3.70
50
1.85
20
0.74
1.7
FEB.
3.86
56
2.16
25
0.97
1.6
MAR.
4.51
55
2.48
24
1.08
3.1
APR.
3.35
56
1.88
25
0.84
3.8
MAY
3.86
57
2.20
23
0.89
3.9
JUN.
4.19
60
2.51
27
1-.13
4.4
JUL.
4.70
60
2.82
26
1.22
4.3
AUG.
4.83
61
2.95
31
1.50
3.9
SEP.
3.82
66
2.52
32
1.22
3.2
OCT.
3.44
62
2.13
.30
1.03
2.4
NOV.
2.95
55
1.62
25
0.74
1.7
DEC.
3.80
57
2.17
23
0.87
1.7
Try 6
months:
September through
February
Surface
Runoff
Depth = 12.45"
Unsurface
Runoff
Depth = 5.57"
Surface Runoff= 12.45"* 22,050 sq ft = 22,877 tuft
12 in/ft
Unsurface Runoff= 5.57"* 7,500 sq ft = 3,481 cuft
12 in/ft
2. Rainfall minus Evaporation on pond surface
21..57 - 12.3 = 9.2"
3. 25 yr - 24 hr runoff
CN = 95
Rainfall = 5.5
Runoff = 4.91"
= 0.'8 ft/6 month
25yr-24hr runoff= 4,911" * 32,550 sq ft = 13,318 cu ft
12"/ft

Dairy -cows are in the freestall and feedlot area 80% of
the time. 80% of the manure produced will be collected in
the waste storage pond. The milk herd have access to a
lounging area.
Volume =170 cows * 14.0 oral/clay. * 180 days * 80%
7.48 gal./cu ft
= 45,818 cu ft
15 close up dry cows and bred heifers will fed in an area
that will scraped into waste storage pond. Cattle will be
on area about 100% of the time.
Volume = 15 cows * 12 cial/day_ * 180 days * 100%-
7.48 gal./cu ft
4,332 cu ft
Total = 45,818 cu ft + 4,332 cu ft = 50,150 cu ft YN .2/yr 100j ,300
5. 25 yr -24 hr rainfall on the pond surface X (OZ
61 AAp�Goo /
Rainfall ='5.511 _ .5 ft
20,060
6. Milking Parlor -Wash Water ;
i. Pipeline and milker wash water 100 gal./day
ii. Tank wash water 50 gal./day
iii. Milk house floor wash water 300 gal./day
iv. Cow wash water 50 cral./dav
500 gal./day
Volume = 500 gal/day*1 cu ft/7.48 gal* 180 days
= 12,032 cu ft
7.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
(from plan)= 2 ft
B.
Summary of Design Volumes
1.
Surface Runoff
22,877
cu ft
2,
Unsurface Runoff
3,481
cu ft
3.
25 year - 24 hour runoff
13,318
cu ft
4.
Manure
50,150
cu ft
S.
Milking Parlor Wash Water
_.12,032
cu ft
TOTAL
101,858
cu ft
S.
Rainfall minus Evaporation
0.8
ft
7.
25 yr - 24 hr rainfall
.5
ft
8.
Freeboard & Emergency Spillway
2_,_o ft
Total
3.3
ft

I
C. Checking Size of Waste Storage Pond for Manure
146.5''X 157.4'
3.3'
wide 2.5:1
nar. 2.5:1
81' X 105'
1.5.1
2.5:1
Volume = 9.8/6[81 X 105 + 130.OX 144.2 + 4(105.5 X 124.6)]
= 130,393
This pond has 6 months of storage.
Normal Pump Out Volume
22,877 + 3,481 + 50,150 + 12,032 + .8' X 146' X 157'
= 106,878 cu ft per 180 days
= 216,724 cu ft per 365 days
= 59.7 ac -in per year
1,621,000 gallons per year
= 540 - 3,000 gallon loads
Maximum pump out level
0.5' + 2.0' + 13,318/(131' X 1.421) = 3.2' below top of dam
= 1.2' below Emer. Spill.
D. Pump out elevation and ESW elevation
The waste storage pond for runoff should be hauled or
irrigated before the water level reaches the 25 yr - 24 hr
storage volume. This elevation is 3.2 ft below the top of
dam. The emergency spillway elevation is 2.0 foot below the
top of dam.
This waste storage pond will store 6 months of manure
production. Each year an average of 59.7 ac -in will be
stored. '
IV. Clean Water Exclusion
A. Diversions
Clean water diversions will be constructed along calf
lot to ensure clean stays out of waste storage pond. The
District Conservationist will design all diversions.
Diversions shall be designed to carry the 25 year - 24 hour
storm.

Clean water shall be excluded to the fullest extent
possible by guttering. This applies mostly to any new
construction since guttering will be difficult to install
and maintain on existing buildings.
V. Lounging Areas, Filter areas and Other Manure
All heavy use areas consist of 9" or compacted ABC
stone over a specified type of filter cloth. Runoff from
these areas and lounging areas will be directed across well
maintained grass sods. Heavy use areas and lounging areas
will be located to provide the maximum grass filter
possible. Grass filter areas shall be at least 100' wide
below lounging areas. Swells or diversions shall be
constructed and maintained along fence lines to kick water
into filters at frequent intervals.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NC -CPA -1
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE Rev. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
M'Ilgtnn airy Farm Address 1163 Snow Creek Rd StatepAlla, AIC— Zip 22625 -
i
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.
Farm Boundary .
Field or Land Use Boundary . —
Tract
2 10
Field Acreage. 3211 Ac.
Field Number . O
1
14.0
Pastureland
2
15.0
Pastureland
Private Road . •. — — — — —
30S
25.0
Cropland
Public Road
3 ES
25.0
Cropland
Buildings, houses. ■ J
Perennial Stream .
Tract
211
intermittent Stream
1
26.5
Cropland
i
Vegetative waterway
2
35.0
Cropland
UISTING PLANNED
Tract
212
Fenct ■ . --Mt—
m When existing fence are combined with other
10S
8.5
Cropland
symbols, they nay be shown as follow:
1 ES
8,5
Cropland
Fence along both sides
F; road —"—•��
20S
11.1
Cropland
Fence along one side
2 ES
11.1
Cropland
of dilch
Fence to bt removed.
Ditch to be removed--h--.—
Terracere.-1.i-2—
Diversion" .
D-1 0-2 —�
;The dots rtpr sent blacks; the arrows
represent spi�Is
Drainage ditch.
(open drain)
Tilt Oroin -.- ---+�
Dam and Reservoir. C
Field Bordtr. —.—.— --.--*--
Firebreak . . —F ---F—--F--F--
Spring and Trough. `W+Mll/
ExcavatedHolding Pit.
Lagoon
Wafer Control
re
Structure • '
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

4
i

m

a
184
sT.-FsviLLE 7MJ)�STATESVILLE
C.
I
IS07 55'
M7,

� 11�,., � �r r� '� �� + �e i fd._na� .moi ti - !�1'•'�'*.
r„” - r , �',, r as �li:. •, d� r , }� �' '. ti i� - r r •
yr • - • s, , �•S.• �'xi[ i',.' ;'s i
•*f." ., �Y,yr 4 ABY/::r:..:::. ..) _ • � , .-
Y' .i TM1�.Y^ �' i' �.. '�. �r`�,�'K.�i'�[r: �tJ..{ � `.?:`;�•� 5 �M�>'.`.; ♦ .fir s ;���:'_ ,�••
1 � r +•. '?. :4: 4 . t'.+ ,,.tri Y r: F i ^'.
' 7;x .. :r;?:::? ;r. tr; lk:�J: ? :!?%.rF ,4 , l;
u1ba�=��s_
.[
'kY4s'xY �!'�ti k •ti ,
V. .:� G.r,...u.yr ,Xy- 71 * r•t: �' r+ r ui1« [.n.,, F .i- n 4 L' � [wr rr:
t 0.�'C' i�, r"4 i� rn.. • t v k[ r # r, i �c, w i i i i ''`��'t..�>- i3!'�1l �l �ky4?Y "! C },. "�'."L•+ ° r, '++i Eiji ra s r J s ! 'y r����
rid � 5, 1 s �, � t��rJ ! f? a,.�, :`.� t ± ritr r- rJ 't+t a. t- _ :, � ,,'•1' ! ° '
3si y ti 9w � i �� 4y: S 4�-�.. , �'} -r, ar.. :fin w"'t •urs -a_` � .Mrrgr �� ` v a' :.
. ! r � +�w3`Raa'�. oy'� �3 � 1C�• c� +' -+ ,,.- ~� ;,a5 r t � *~ ��1 r • t - '
�'t£�. k� :�:'. _ t" r-d.�.K�"u.. �A ti•![t.._. �. �} - _ ., _ �.; .. - r?Rr 'r fir: '-}�.-t 'r.
�, :�. i'-A;,r�� 4" 4 �r1y' ! bI .'Y F1 t ,�"r!��" .r f � � � , yi ,i hl 5�,]' � tY•• 'yi'.4�1'� '�e. ' F" t}.: y;. - .rM1` } ..F+ ♦:i'.�n^ 0 7.,IyRy
•a i 44��• +ti:. 11_:fFS,-rfr,��.1'• V 7fP`w• r
:}� �'t�'+yq ,?'i •"an • [;ii � r�Yp:JA�••., �.�' "`'. ,r,,�y :�iii, ri.
�E,' , :-1f�,-�F'�,-ir`-••n'�YI[��.I'�".,;�5- .P' � rl �v_iac:
I ex YILZr
+yl � t �'':"•�:hr ! i,..� 54-�,�1,'i"' f •}yr f '+r t �a s� -s` df'"5 +'"1 r:
t�;TI•I!
1 g - k•� j.
at
!'.. .;t�i•u)-e�':w: i.... iat,r„=�_�.i::w.. _••r,r: ~•. 1.fi S:_'r 1•� �r+i'
'.L. �--Xr• �:. � ,�• r� .�� i � �r Tt� '�.�i. .�'f �<�s tib+~ w°.�,�;
we..{4r, r; a,ti.�'•`t5`,t�= f r .. rte ,M1 a•^r. J rsr l ��«wy
1 Mir i ,.,F• Y;�• 1� /4•
' � s �M�L 1 " r � t Jh1 ! is µ � "� t i •e4'[ •.At.• 1
'b ..R'Y� ,�}fir ?w'. �. '• r•.r 1-' Fp •..�• �•�.r: !` v -r.
'` rr ,.l s ;`r v r r-.ia�: E.• "4 r t. f 1 It `5j
r •", •1 is �� 1,'{.1 •�. �_ ..�
� t «ir �rf L� •1S'� i .}t4i ;J';.' �`-,•!� L.. _'!f t :•: t.. _�J.,�
;5•'F,, .� iA,I � Mi>, iu -_; R :'t�•''••:•' ,.Aiit
.;i �'I �ti:• 1, `,r Y. S-• r1i �J'1
k}�".3'.$5: i7?%• �.'�.��. t1 •a; �� .t:,�.y: :�`!G'.. :":;:4wi'�,�`e,ay�:.`�v-'..",`ifs l��j•u`-':i.'�"t �4.: �•k ;
'���' + {J H' y - �� 41 �'+ 1 A Ik.h,�yy,,,j FW,F ,} 1 �, / rl iY � �:; �Ir; •GLy l
q r � N 3�xd• r W"� � ,y� � �
� ��r- �•=,!r: {� ��+Nfi SY,i �iF ���'l fie. r5u i�i-rb''^ ye-T.Y�^T'y�'M'f' lt.. [' f_- +•-,^� ;�.,
?r '��r 's ��'_ t 1Jr�Je'-?'°r f' [ '.s3t n�tj ZM a ��ra• •y;; �+i: >,'. _
++ s V}" .t�, i 'Ter.,' �y ,;'�,Ii. pr. t, k)'�. �� ,� C 1�' � rr � a" '• reg- . '
r �. .+•�'• ila ,� ;., frtr 9 3'{F - i {t :1 M'.a •Lf .S�',+i� �i h i � J ,+-
+ F ��_. Y ,,C"a':.i .tYr A 5��. 2 i,.iafir�• S"!,�.i li�4F tt�er�irr+�'n [� �7� {� ���. �Y 7!'k .a � i. i 1
tJ 7 k ` -�"4 `_ �R`. Y �, '4 Y ;}-'Y�'+'tJ' 2• y .r.1 - f.
Ad A4,W " rt' tyy, "� -1 - ,,s, r•J
-k c � t't t, -, "(3 r G '` �F r�S � - a ti F r`! Ya�t�k• �J�S [� - w4�+►"�'x.y+ati ,Y- •+-
�� �{ 7. �r�+T1S19 I i,t4 ��] +s�,t'•`. w N>' �`(L y ry Crr'SKh?iF.n '!, tj�"r'� t�,+ +
��.'F�r+Mi,•,G._ i3�r�tc,�;•t. fi i -r.�.:jt.iw}�- i ;. .r "�it:a•r [FF''�;:- � i i 'ir,!r4 �. iRf"+-�'yIF/a5�1�s:retsV1r �6Lrf4`�T..F,1� -htiits.>- ✓�i'Nyr,r�'".;:f{r1,1�L.�aiz e�L;c . I/f`%

ENX
I

N
I -

fill!
M�� is .d rL {4ily r��S• r• �gT�� ft'n-•kJ rr�lh, i r+r li �}`' j��'>f{ao} .�A .�•;i;'^' ir��
all
A, RAO%
0s!
-_;�i
RON*,
A
--
I -0 A jpq"_
ij;A
­ •y'
, 1 f'. �- ;, . i.-, _�', ', -'_" . Ir:".%"-,'._�4
QW
,17y fle WN Ap%gy
ISO
Woo—,
1AL now
VIES
-
P1 1
a0v
exit
W"I
......... ......

� ���"�"1 �Iy��r�s.����' -., 1YY y f::, r�'j,�.,•`- ri,s• r•-049?��.
��•��.111111 4 r ' S �I Vit; �44c�'�f�' ��i'�"y9S��+{ � y';; '�• 1' �• ' •4,;��'� .'J ,�%�.,� `'" 1 "i ti i�
All,ov
.'• Ili
KjA,p I Na,
1w'KR
�',�s►F.s�„-�i.`-.-i��„� �' � ;,T!J}; �iiFi��+� ��...; j: i Jij •!.`� •. `'�1?, ' '-'� ii ...., - '•� � .r
�i,•prp
/ �'i� ;: 7L:.�-' .•✓t' • '-ar �1sr:'�C""�A' =t -t: ><l�C.'�..: t �.
r I t 9
".••T_•t S .:� � ��—'w�� / .a'; S ':,_�I,'1/J�t'`f ''•L li •1•` .r .��.� -2L;
k,py ��rJ . a.4� ��.�� � i,��e _`•' •+. :r 'If • '�' ,� %'�•��.' ..'.5,. (��:.��.:, Jr•�
Ise J• 1 !•', l.5 f'1 r.r � r l �F y:. '• ly•'•' , 1 � T•• ••{ lip"
l•i'• Y-1,'°`� .��, •'�'
li MS�'':.! / :r;°r '�'S•'• ,� •• ,� r�' � y I'./1+ �• ?s� •r�..4y��I
I?.l;I`s';�x� `r r�:a,���� �� J. ..�•�� ��''� !�'{�� .�, "�'fy;.� r ��� ,'•`'..f• .-� j�.1`y'_`��1�7
][. �:i•ar: �. _ >r ��` � � ''�w. f. •j�L ��PL':•. �' Y� _ `r"+ls��fi�t_3_•.i�
ZWKvYrllr: r' e� } N to
iia,:3=e�3 s_ ``�%'�JL�'',,�� � `..s�}atr.; /� ' � ;f � + 1 � /'�--5.4-;'.•��:
t— MW71
DWI
V.
w.a �!�r4?���1' � ►f `�F• J'r'-"f�j :�0� �• 'sT �'�3�:'� {�'` �4 w,� f r��lq/. r`
�'�i17': �t':,i �" .°f7'�; .li+•'!' ''�t� +� 'c � 1fi4�r '`�.��:KY � �. .1�. •� ;; is
,a..t :�. ;:�,,• r3 t^%++: fir!: �r =f`: .
3L�•,�"r•,yi 7 k,_�,� a - I.r '''yCy k iP �' .F?L•rti.� \ r. -..
'/�•-1 �''J '.C��I :.�i,�rirtj) .,�,� s15r;I�F1� r.i�w• ��"��•�:�-.���'p"r `/."
'��!.�,`� nL'': (� .�• ��l' 7 ��L, f++S'"� 'I.: ..ice � � j
��;�t�� .� . '�.4: /�i��ttj ` f r' t..y='j. ,! 1 �';�r�a_ •,:�:' _y ' :r.'4 ��L.� � ti,y_� i
�- Y. � `� Ff � '�•�...'t Lai.? I d ., ~1�.� �'�" �� t��j`�
:t \\� ` -. It`d • � - - .�1L:�_ �- Ic�t. � n' •i- ��.: �: fr': J• � �4`
:#i .i.y• .;- �j� •,ed:l': � r»"i jr'.►TT r, •� ter_ _
';i -r „ +. �,,, �..R -,s.;,•;'.. ': .'!,' ,•y11� '-I try s-14
f � � � •�/•a�rAti�. ,.Ye��, '�� f 4• '^ ("�' 4.ry1 ,•1� `11 �. � f ;!`.: !'�y; "Y,.
,,,,. �� , ' '— �.:Wi: �•.�"`7,f�•1..>�Y �.;.;..~. ; ;\\•: \.�� �sr t��R 1:/; Fry; ':.�'i,
�`� �y. i.•'. i•r: a" '� Y.\: •� r�' _ .. 5•''�'+ 1 S`'t^ 1 y '. - .-.. l �t/�.% _t.. _ y'T `
:Y / *. ,� ���''• .'i N,,f• '�•` 'ii■1t� � ,v 'J , ."�:��. .fi 1�/1J.Lt•�''k �+e ...r.
.f�'� �//i: f `'_ir,3�. i a .. �':t,,.: ,'.-, � -*a .s �� : ''� ; s . , � ,t. `. -• � . ,i...:sr'p`T?'.'7: t� iii' ,:'�
• sem% m;;f ', � Y�+.. -1_� ' �,_ _, ...- .,.Y�E • .� . • 4 �1'.• � f�+S��!f ' =�, ��.ix:- :_ _ �+ =�1

78000
FEE
52'30'
8 ...,
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey
g� Control by USGS and USC&GS
Topography by photogrammet►ic methods from aerial photographs
taken 1965. Field checked 1969
Polyconic projection. 1927 North American datum
10,000 -foot grid based on North Carolina coordinate system
1000 -meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks,
zone 17, shown in blue
Fine red dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked
1
M N 1000
+MILSO'(.)2'
-
1
65
UTMI GRID AND 1964 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
THIS
FOR SAL
A FOLDER AESC

Narrative
Dairy Confinement waste are scraped from confinement areas, stored in a Waste Storage Pond and
spread as a slurry by tank spreading. The Heifer and Calf waste are handled as solids by collecting from
stalls, feeding areas and watering areas and spread broadcase on pasture and cropland.
These animals produce 13,142 lbs. of N that will be utilized by growing Corn for silage, Small Grain for
hay or silage and Tall Fescue Grass for hay and pasture.
There is not sufficient N produced from the animal waste to meet all the crop and forage nutrient needs.
Additional fertilization will be needed. Soil test and waste sample test results will be required to balance
out the additional nutrient needs for the crops to be grown. They will also be needed to for agency
reviews.
All needed cropland, hayland and pastureland protection practices are established.
Cropland on Tracts 210 and 212 are striperopped with every other strip maintained in Tall Fescue Grass.
Crops strips and grass strips will be rotated every 2 to 4 years as needed to maintain a grass stand
Support Information for Defined Sources
,` -- Previm. — —Database Version 1.06— __�� Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Narrative Page 1

Support Information for Defined Sources
The dairy animals on this farm are not totally confined. Ajustments are made to establish a reliable
amount of animal waste collected and to combine all sources handled as a slurry and as a solid.
U1 - Dairy Mills Cows, Confined Dry Cows, and Bred Heifers - Slurry
The following calculations define the Dairy waste slurry produced per head, stored in the waste storage
pond and spread as a slurry on to cropland or grassland.
170 Dairy milk cows confined 80% of the time producing 7749 gal/head/year = 1,03,864 gals/year.
15 Dry cows and bred heifiers producing 7749 gal/head/year = 116,23 5 gals/year.
Additional liquid added for runoff from lots and paved area = 451,197 gal/year.
The total Dairy Waste Slurry produced is 1,621,096 gals/year.
U2 - Calves, Heifers and Dry Cows - Solids
The following calculations define the Dairy waste solids collected from stalls, sheds, feeding areas and
waters and handled as solids.
20 Calves totally confined producing 4.1 tons/head/year = 82 tons/head/year.
20 Calves confined 75% of the time producing 4.1 tons/head/year = 61.5 tons/year.
30 Heifers confined 25% of the time producing 12 tons/head/year = 90 tons/year.
30 Dry Cows confined 25% of the time producing 17 tons/head/year = 127.5 tons/year.
The total Dairy Waste Solids produced is 361 tons/year.
PMViaw Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Narrative Page 2

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
U2
Millstone Dairy Manure Solids waste generated 361.00 tons/year by a 100
animal Dairy Solid operation.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
1552
Incorporated
2058
Injected
NIA
Irrigated
N/A
Actual PAN Applied
Year 1
4975
Year 2
4975
U1
Millstone Dairy Slurry waste generated 1,621,096 gals/year by a 185
animal Dairy Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximatel 180 da s.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
11590
Incorporated
15 805
Injected
17912
Irrigated
10537
Actual PAN Applied
Year
32646
Year
33239
Notes:
In source ID, S means standard source, U means user defined source.
The following minimum criteria must be met in order for a plan to use a User Defined Source to determine
the total pounds of PAN in lieu of NRCS Standards:
L Recommended standard procedures for collecting the waste samples to be analyzed must be followed
2. The samples must be analyzed either at the NCDA Waste Analysis Laboratory or at a private lab. The
analysis reports must be available.
3. Records of annual volumes of lagoon liquid applied must be available.
4. A minimum of 3 years of records of both nutrient concentrations and annual liquid volumes must be used
to determine the farm averages. A minimum of three samples (one per quarter with seasonal variation)
must be collected annually for analysis. For dai.rys with waste storage ponds, the minimum annual sample
number is two.
ti
�Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed OI -02-200I 5ouroe Page I

5. Extreme sample analysis values should not be used to determine the averages. From the standards
database based on 1,403 data points, one statistical standard deviation from the mean deviates 48% for
swine lagoon liquid nitrogen. Therefore, any value used to calculate the 3 -year farm average N
concentration that lies outside of the range of the mean t or - 48% should not be used to calculate the farm
average.
If, at a minimum, these criteria have been met for the most recent 3 -year period, then the waste utilization
plan may be revised indicating a change in the total PAN on the farm as determined from site specific data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 Source Page 2

The Waste Utilu;aticn table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the craps to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included.
A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the
manure generated by the operation. Animal operations that generate, liquid waste and utilize waste storage facilities (lagoons or holding ponds) may apply more or
less waste in any given year than is annually generated by the facility. In order to determine whether the plan adequately utilizes the waste produced by the facility,
the storage capacity table included in this plan should be reviewed to ensure that the design capacity of the storage facility is not exceeded during the planning
period.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be used to
balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal
waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Waste Utilization- Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
I Awes
Crop
RYE
RYE
Unit
Naro®en Comm.
PA FerL
Nutrian Nutrient
Req'd Applied
Applic.
Period N N
Res.
Qbs/A)
N
Applin
Method
Manure Liquid Solid liquid Solid
PA Manure Manure Manure Manure
Nurtriad Applied Applied Applied Applied
Applied (acre) (nae) (Field) (Field)
1000
lbs/A A tans 1000 Rals tons
210
k
U2
%TrWASSEE
L4.0325.0cscuc
aPastwe
4.0
Taos
8!I-7r3I 133 0
D
Broad
133 0.0 34.9 0.0 3093
210
2
U2
HIWASSIE
15.0a
Passu a
4.3
Tars
BIl-7x31 Q
0
Hroad
142 0.0 33.0 0.4 493.3
210
3 ES
UL
HIWASSEE
25.0Silo
18.7
Tans
2/15-630 2 0
0
Broad
204 20.6 0.0 514.9 0.0
210
3 FS
Ul
HIWASSFE
25.0
Grain, silo
8.5
Tans
9115-3131 94 0
0
Broad
94 9.5 0.0 237.3 0.0
210
3 OS
Ul
HIWASSFE
25.0
Iia
4.3
Tors
811-7131 189 0
0
Broad
100 10.1 0.0 252.41 0.0
210
305AU1
WASSEE
25.6
25.0
escueHa
4.3
Tans
811-7/31 189 0
0
Broad
89 0.0 20,7 0.0 517.4
211
1CIL
26.5
26.0
Sila
28.5
Tens
2/15�/3D 223 0
20
Broad
203 20.5 0.0 532.9 0.0
211
1CIL
26.5
260
Chwin, Sila
98
Tans
9115-3/31 109 0
D
Broad
109 ll.o 0.4 286.1 0.0
211
2CII
35.0
35,0
eat C=ram
52.2
Bushels
911-3131 0 0
D
Broad
0 0.0 0.0 Q.4 Q.fl
Preview Database Version 1.06
,5coG ?°
Date Printed. 01-02-2001
g TO AJS 451b of M
-of �o
�`(
WiJT Page 1

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Traci
Field
Source
LD.
Soil Series
Tata)
Acre
Use,
Aar es
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applin
Period
Nitro m
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
N
Comm.
F -L
Nrdrierd.
Applied
N
Res.
(Ibs/A)
N
Applin
Method
Manure
PA
Nuina t
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid Liquid Solid
Manure Manure Mamue
Applied Applied Applied
(nae) (Field) (Field)
Ibs1A
1000
1/A
teas 1000 ols tans
211
2
Ul
I CECIL
35.0
35.0
Mea
36.5
Bushels
411-9115
142
0
0
Broad.
142
14.3
0.0 501.8 0.0
Ie crop
212
1 ES
UI
CECIL
6.5
8.0
Sila
19.5
Tons
2/15-6130
213
0
0
Broad
213
21.5
0.0 172.0 0,0
212
1 ES
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0
Grain, Silo
9.4
Tans
9/15-3131
104
0
0
Broad
104
10.5
0,0 84.0 0.0
212
1 OS
Ul
CECIL
9.5
8.0
escue Ha
4.3
Tons
811-7131
189
0
0
Broad
189
19.1
0,0 152.6 0.0
212
2 ES
Ut
CECIL
11.1
11.0
Silo
19.5
Tans
2/15-6/30
213
0
0
Broad
213
21.5
0.0 236.5 0.0
212
2 ES
UL
CECIL
11.1
11.0
mall Grain, SilaE
9.4
Tons
9/15-3131
104
01
0
Broad
1 104
10.5
0.0 115.5 010
212
2091
Ul
I CEC1L
11.11
11.0
L= H&V
4.3
Tans
8/1-7/31 1
189
01
0
Broad
1 189
19.1
0.0 249.9 0.0
Lagoon Lipids
Total Applied, 1000 gallms 3,2%
Total Produced, 1000 gallms 1,621
Bolan 1000 ons -1675
�&nure Solids
Total Applied, tans 1,322
Tata) Produced, tans 361
Ralanm tuns 1 -961
Nates: 1. In the trod cohmm, symbol - me= leased, otherwise, awned. 2. Symbol • means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 WUT Page 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 2
Tract
Field
Source
I -D.
I Soil Series
Total
Ane
Use.
Au+®
CrOP
RYE
RYE
Unit
Applin
Period
Nlrogen
PA
Nutrient
Ruga
N
Coomi
Fat
Nutrierd
Applied
N
Rea. Manure
(lbs/A) PA
Nutrient
Applied
Applic.
N Method IWA
Liquid Solid
Man= Manure
Appliod Applied
(nae) (aaa}
1000
JRVA tans
liquid
Mature
Applied
(Field)
1000 stals
Solid
Mann=
Applied
(Field)
tons
210
1
U2
HIWASSEE
14.0
10.0Pasmro
le
4.0
Tons
811-7/31
133
0
0 Broad
133
0.0 30.9
0.0
309.3
210
2
U2
HIWASSEE
15.0
10.0
merepwaue
4.3
Tans
8/1-7131
142
0
0 Br=ad.
142
0.0 33.0
0.0
495.3
210
3 FSS
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
Silage
18.7
Tons
2/156/30
204
0
0 Broad.
204
20.6 0.0
514.9
0.0
2I0
3 FS
Ul
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
mail Grain, Silapp
8.5
Teas
9/15-3/31
94
0
0 Broad
94
9.5 0.0
217.3
0.0
210
308
U1
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
escue Hay
4.3
Tana
811-7/31
189
U
0 Broad.
100
10.1 0.0
252.4
0.0
210
30S
U2
HIWASSEE
25.0
25.0
carne Ha
4.3
Tina
811-7/31
189
0
0 Broad
89
0.0 20.7
0.0
517.4
211
1
UI
CECIL
26.5
26.0
mall Grain, SilsEp
9.8
Tons
9/15-3/31
0
0
0 Broad
0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
211
1
UI
CECIL
26.5
26.0
s, Manu iv4
37.4
Bushels 411-9115
145
0
0 Broad
145
I4.6 0.0
380.6
0.0
le Crop
211
2
Ul
CECIL
35.0
35.0
aa, Grain
522
Bushels 911-3/31
105
01
20 Broad
85
8.6 0.0
300.4
0.0
211
2
U1
CECIL
35.0
35.0
Sita
20.0
Tons
2/15-6/30
218
0
20 Broad.
198
20.01 0.0
699.6
0.0
212
1 ES
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0
Silage
19.5
Tma
2/15-6/30
213
0
0 Broad
213
21.5 0.0
172.0
0.0
212
. 1 FS
Ul I
MCIL
8.5
8.0
Nmall Grain Siler
9.4
Tans
9/15-3/31
104
0
0 Broad
104
10.5 0.0
84.0
0.0
212
i OS
Ul
CECIL
8.5
8.0
e9aw Ha
4,3
Tons
811-7/31
189
0
0 Brand
189
19.1 0.0
152.6
0.0
212
2 ES
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0
Silo
19.5
Tons
2/15-/30
213
0
0 Broad
213
21.5 DA
236.5
0.0
212
2 ES
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0
aoall Grain. Silo
9.4
Tara
9115-351
1911-7/31
104
0
0 -road
104
10.5 0.0
115.5
0.0
212
20S
Ul
CECIL
11.1
11.0
ware Ha
4.3
Teas
1 189
ol
0 1Broad
.1 189
19.1 1 0.0
209.9
0.0
Lagoon Liquids
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,356
Total Produced, 1000 giallons 1,621
Balaam 1000 lions -1733
Manure Solids
Total Applied, tons
1,322
Total Produoed,tonus
361
BalaA toes
-%1
Nous: 1. In the tract cwlumm symbol - means leased, athawise, awned 2. SyTnbol • means user enlerod data.
Preview Database Version 1.06 Date Printed: 01-02-2001 WUT Page 3

Millstone Dairy Farm
Xredell County, North Carolina
OPERATION
And
MAINTENANCE PLAN
(0200 Certification Plan)
In Cooperation with the
Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District
January 2, 2001
jrrrirr,irrrrrrrrrrrrr�►.irrrrrrrrr,rr�r,r,rrrrr,�rrrrrr.ir.r,�rrrrrrrr.irrrrrr.�r,irrrrrrrrrrr.�
J

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FARM SKETCH
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
1. WASTE STORAGE POND
2. MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER SYSTEM
3. AGITATION AND WASTE SPREADING
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
S. CONCRETE CURBING
6. VEGETATED DIVERSION
7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
9. HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION
10. GENERAL COMMENTS
I
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
9
9

OPERATION and MAINTENANCE PLAN
.0200 Certification Plan
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
This Animal Waste Management System consists of the following components:
1, MILKING PARLOR WASTE WATER PIPE
2. WASTE STORAGE POND
3. AGITATION AND APPICATION SYSTEM
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
5. FILTER AREA FOR LOUNGING AREA
6. CONCRETE CURBING
7. VEGETATED DIVERSION
8. FILTER AREA PLANTING
9. HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION
All solid waste will be scraped from the lots into the WASTE STORAGE POND (WSP). Slurry waste
will be tanker spread from the Waste Storage Pond at agronomic rates. The WASTE STORAGE POND
is designed to provide 180 days storage for the slurrywastes produced by 170 head milking herd and 15
freshing milk cows and heifers.
Contaminated runoff will flow into the WASTE STORAGE POND. This structure is designed to
provide storage for runoff from the feedlot and waste water from the milk barn for a 180 day period and
provide storage space for the 25 year, 24 hour storm runoff from the feedlot and any watershed into the
pond.
This Animal Waste Management System is designed to prevent discharge of Animal Waste
Contaminates to surface waters from the 25 year, 24 hour storm, as required under the Non -discharge
regulations.
Runoff from lounging areas is diverted through 100' of filter areas.
Manure at Heifer feed areas and Dry Cow Feed areas in pasture and
lots will also be collected and spread.
4

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
1 ASTE STORAGE POND
OVERVIEW
The WASTE STORAGE POND is designed to store the average feedlot runoff and wastewater from the milk barn for a 180
day period. Additional storage space is included to contain the 25 year, 24 hour storm runoff from the feedlot. A permanent
marker will need to be set indicating the level of storage available prior to infringing on the 25 year, 24 hour storm capacity.
The maximum storage level is 1.2 ft. below the emergency spillway elevation. The WASTE STORAGE POND consists of
earthen dam and concrete push off for discharging contaminated water and manure into the structure. .
OPERATION
The service life of the WASTE STORGE POND will be determined by the level of management for the
entire system. Once the manure and bedding materials have reached the WASTE STORGAGE POND,
how effectively the waste is agitated will determine the amount of solids which remain in the WASTE
STORAGE POND.
Over time it is expected that some solids will accumulate in the WASTE STORAGE POND. The
accumulated solids should not reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to a point,
which requires removal of the solids for many years J F adequate lot scraping and waste agitation is
maintained. In contrast, poor management will result in the rapid accumulation of solids, which will
reduce the usable capacity of the WASTE STORAGE POND to the point that some form of dredging will
be required. If a large volume of solid waste is allowed to wash from the lot and/or if inadequate agitation
is performed, this dredging operation could be required in a very short period of time.
MAINTENANCE
The concrete in the WASTE STORAGE POND should be inspected periodically for major cracks,
Vegetation on the dam should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to maintain a vigorous
stand. The dam should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. Mowing operations must
take place only when the soil on the dam is dry, and vegetation should not be mowed to a height of less
than 4 inches at any time. Any evidence of sloughing or seepage should be reported to the Iredell Soil dt
Water Conservation District office. -Any trees or woody growth should be removed by cutting and also
removing the stumps and smoothing to re-establish vegetation.
1 5

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
2. MIL,IKING PARLOR AND FEED LOT WASTE WATER PIPES
OVERVIEW
The milking parlor waste water pipe consists of pipe from milking parlor to waste storage pond. The feed
lot runoff is collect by 18 inch PPC Smooth Wall pipe connected to a drop structure and discharged into
the waste storage pond.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect all component of the PIPING SYSTEM for cracks or other damage, and make repairs or replace
as needed with material meeting required specifications. Inspect for any material that could block pipes
daily.
3 AGITATION AND APPICATION SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
The AGITATION AND APPICATION SYSTEM consists of a tractor PTO driven agitator/pump and
tank spreading for field application system for slurry or loader and spreader for solids. Waste is hauled to
application fields and. spread.
OPERATION
Agitation and hauling will be initiated prior to the waste storage pond liquid level reaching the maximum
level marker. Slurry waste will not be applied in a manner to cause runoff or erosion or to frozen or
saturated soils.
Maintenance
Fields that receive waste application: should have soil tested annually. Soil test along:with waste sample
testing can be used to plan nutrient needs for fixture crops and to monitor the soil nutrient levels.
6

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
4. CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM
Le INM v /I
Clean water collection and piping consist of piping clean water under stock trails and diverting clean
water around lounging and feedlot areas.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the components of the CLEAN WATER COLLECTION AND PIPING SYSTEM annually for
cracks or other damage, and snake repairs or replace as needed. Inspect annually and remove accumulated
sediment.
S. CONCRETE CURBING
OVERVIEW
The CONCRETE CURBING constructed on the lot will prevent contaminated liquids from entering the
stream in any storm less severe than the 25 year, 24 hour storm.
MAINTENACE
The concrete should be inspected periodically for major cracks.
6 VEGETATED DIVERSION
OVERVIEW
VEGETATED DIVERSION located above the waste storage pond will convey non -contaminated runoff
around the structure,
MAINTENANCE
The vegetation in the DIVERSION should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a
vigorous stand. It is essential that neither vehicles nor livestock be allowed to create travel lanes within
the DIVERSION. The DIVERSION should be mowed at least annually to prevent woody growth. The
DIVERSION may be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place
only when the soils are d y. Vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than 4 inches.
If sedimentation has reduced the capacity of the channel, contact the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation
District for technical assistance in correcting this problem. See FILTER AREA PLANTING for further
maintenance requirements.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
7. LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION
OVERVIEW
LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION has been installed at locations as indicated on the plan maps
According to NRCS standard 382 (Fencing)
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION periodically for mechanical damage or rot. If fencing wire
becomes loose, re -tighten to original specifications. If fence post are rotted or damage in any way,
replace damaged posts with a post, which meets the original specifications.
S. FILTER AREA PLANTING
OVERVIEW
FILTER AREA PLANTING applies to seeding 100 feet of grass below the lounging areas and seeding
diversions.
MAINTENANCE
Soil samples should be taken at least once per year to determine fertilizer and lime recommendations.
Fertilizer and lime should be applied either during September -October or February -March. Vegetation
should be inspected periodically and reseeded as needed to insure a vigorous stand. The filter area may
be control grazed or mowed for hay. Grazing and mowing operations must take place only when the soils
are dry, and vegetation should not be grazed or mowed to a height of less than 4 inches. All FILTER
AREAPLANTING should be mowed at least annually to prevent -woody growth. Mowing operations
must take place only when the soil is dry and vegetation should not be mowed to height of less than4
inches at any time. Do not mow cool season grasses during periods when plants are showing signs of
drought stress.
8

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
9. HEAVY USE AREA PR_OT_ECTI N
OVERVIEW
The HEAVY USE AREA PROTECTION is around the feeding barn as calves, heifers and dry cows
gather in from adjoining lots and pasture.
MAINTENANCE
Inspect the HEAVY USE AREAS periodically for damage and wear. If gravel layer becomes thin, gravel
shall be replaced to maintain a minimum of 4 inches of cover over the filter cloth. Manure accumulations
on edges and adjacent to concrete should be removed at regular intervals to maintain drainage away from
HEAVY USE AREAS.
10. GENERAL COMMENTS
PESTICIDE USE
Extreme care should be exercised with use of all herbicides so that desirable vegetation, especially that of
the filter area, diversion and dam, is not adversely affected. It is a violation of the law to use any pesticide
in a manner not permitted by its labeling. To protect yourself, never apply any pesticide in a manner or
for a purpose other than as instructed on the label or in labeling accompanying the pesticide product that
you purchase. Do not ignore the instructions for use of protective clothing and including containers.
SAFETY
Waste storage ponds dangerous to people and animals as they commonly have a crust on the surface
making them look solid. Push off ramp is especially dangerous due to height and slick conditions. Ramp
restrains and fencing should be inspected and repairs needed be made immediately. All employees and
visitors should be made aware of the dangers.
REPAIRS
Notify the Iredell Soil and Water Conservation District if repairs or major modifications are required for
any of the components of the Waste Management Plan
E