20040370 Ver 1_Complete File_20040308

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
August 9, 2001
Ug0370
w C., %,inQ. t-
C)-A P t I V-,
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Thank you for your June 21, 2001, request for information from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) on the potential environmental impacts of proposed bridge replacements in
Nash and Wayne Counties, North Carolina (TIP Nos. B-36$1 & B-4320). This report provides
scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves as initial scoping
comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their permitting and/or certification
processes for this project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is planning to replace the following
bridges:
1. Mq2b), B-3Bridge No. 277 on SR 1555 over the CSX Railroad, Nash County; and,
2. Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over NE Cape Fear River, Wayne County.
The following recommendations are provided to assist you in your planning process and to
facilitate a thorough and timely review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practical as outlined in Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act Amendments
of 1977. In regard to avoidance and minimization of impacts, we recommend that proposed
highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways, utility corridors, or
previously developed areas in order to minimize habitat fragmentation and encroachment. Areas
exhibiting high biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and region should be
avoided. Crossings of streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings
and/or occur on a structure wherever feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert structures
that maintain natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and
A
wildlife passage, should be employed. Highway shoulder and median widths should be reduced
through wetland areas. Roadway embankments. and fill areas should be stabilized by using
appropriate erosion control devices and techniques. Wherever appropriate, construction in
sensitive areas should occur outside fish spawning and migratory bird nesting seasons.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map of the Rocky Mount 7.5 Minute Quadrangle does
not show wetland resources in the CSX work area. The NWI map of the Williams 7.5 Minute
Quadrangle does show wetland resources in the project area. However, while the NWI maps are
useful for providing an overview of a given area, they should not be relied upon in lieu of a
detailed wetland delineation by trained personnel using an acceptable wetland classification
methodology. Therefore, in addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation for this project include the following in sufficient detail to
facilitate a thorough review of the action.
1. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be
impacted by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact
should be differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the
National Wetlands Inventory. Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps).
2. If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend that every effort be
made to identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance. Project planning should
include a detailed compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland
impacts. Opportunities to protect mitigation areas in perpetuity, preferably via
conservation easement, should be explored at the outset.
The document presents a number of scenarios for replacing each bridge, ranging from in-place to
relocation, with on-site and off-site detours. The Service recommends that each bridge be
replaced on the existing alignment with an off-site detour.
The enclosed list identifies the federally-listed endangered and threatened species, and Federal
Species of Concern (FSC) that are known to occur in Nash and Wayne Counties. The Service
recommends that habitat requirements for the listed species be compared with the available
habitats at the respective project sites. If suitable habitat is present within the. action area of the
project, biological surveys for the listed species should be performed. Environmental
documentation that includes survey methodologies, results, and NCDOT's recommendations
based on those results, should be provided to this office for review and comment.
FSC's are those plant and animal species for which the Service remains concerned, but further
biological research and field study are needed to resolve the conservation status of these taxa.
Although FSC's receive no statutory protection under the ESA, we would encourage the NCDOT
to be alert to their potential presence, and to make every reasonable effort to conserve them if

found. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be contacted for information on
species under state protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of,the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Tom
McCartney at 919-856-4520, Ext. 32.
Sincerely,
C:z
Dr. Garland B. Pardue
Ecological Services Supervisor
Enclosures
cc:. COE, Raleigh, NC (Eric Alsmeyer)
COE, Washington, NC (Michael F. Bell)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (John Hennessy)
NCDNR, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:08/08/01:919/856-4520 extension 32:?2bdgnash.wak
C) 31 D
_ V O
' p Sys 9 ,, V"
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ?"? , r°??pG9 rO
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYND(hTPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 24, 2005
WBS Element: 33657.3.2 (5-4320)
Contract No.: C200969
F. A. Number: BRSTP-403 (100)
Counties: Wayne/Duplin
Description: Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River and Approaches on NC 403
MEMORANDUM TO: Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
State Construction Engineer
FROM: Wendi O. Johnson, PE Cj
Division Construction Engineer
SUBJECT: Approved Preconstruction Conference Minutes
We are transmitting an approved copy of the minutes covering the preconstruction conference for
the above project, which was held on May 4, 2005. The minutes were approved by the Contractor,
Sanford Contractors, Inc., as recorded.
Attachment
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Gary Jordan (US Fish & Wildlife)
Nicole Thomson (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
Pat McClain (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
Bill Biddlecome (US Army Corps of Engineers)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Travis Wilson (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Tony Grantham (Tri-County EMC)
Kevin Pfautz (BellSouth)
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina. 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Ellis C. Powell, Jr., PE
May, 24, 2005
Page 2
ec: Cecil Jones, PE
Donald Pearson
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bryant Bunn, PE
Michael Robinson, PE
Andy Pridgen
Shannon Sweitzer, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Kevin Bowen, PE
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Don G. Lee
K. J. Kim, Ph.D., PE
Jimmy Marler
Jamie Shern
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Ashley Reid
David R. Henderson, PE
Jermery Armstrong
Ronnie Moore
Tim Little, PE
Gerald McCauley

tiIq y ?? ,
r en" .2 7
R•
qN?S O?RQGq S
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING MINUcy
WBS Element: 33657.3.2 (B4320)
Federal Aid No.: BRSTP403 (100)
Contract No.: C200969
Counties: Wayne/Duplin
Description: Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River and Approaches on NC 403
The Preconstruction Conference for the above proiect was held in the Wilson Division CNffice
Conference Room on May 4, 2005 with the following persons in attendance:
NAME REPRESENTIN
S. R. Davis PyCDOT - Division Four Bridge
D. A. Pridgen NCDOT - Division Four QA Lab
H. R. Fulghum, Jr. NCDOT - Division Four Construction
C. S. Grantham NCDOT - Division Four Construction
K. G. Bowen NCDOT - Division Four Construction
J. A. Branch NCDOT - Division Four Construction
H. G. Coker NCDOT - Division Four Construction
Katie Simmons NCDOT - Roadside Environmental Unit
Heather Scott NCDOT - Division Four Right of Way
Ashley Reid NCDOT - Utility Coordinating Unit
John Nigro NCDOT - Project Services
Charles K. Pulley Sanford Contractors, Inc
Randall Gattis Sanford Contractors, Inc.
Kenny Brady Sanford Contractors, Inc.
VVendi Johnson, Division Construction Engineer, presided over the conference.
Kenny Pulley will act as Project Superintendent and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Contractor.
Bobby Fulghum will act as Project Inspector and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Division of Highways.
The Contractor plans to begin work June 6. Road will be closed at this time.
The Contractor presented his progress schedule which will be checked, and he will be advised if satisfactory.
By copy of these minutes, we are advising the Contractor that his progress schedule has been checked and is
approved as submitted.
RIGHT OF WAY
Heather Scott covered this portion of the proposal.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 2
All of the right of way necessary for this project has been acquired. Right of way agreements have been
given to the Resident Engineer that cover all right of way and easements necessary for this project acquired
by negotiation.
There are no 200 Series Items on this project.
There is no known asbestos contamination, underground storage tanks or any known soil contamination
within the right of way of the project.
The Contractor is advised not to exceed the ri_eht of way or easement areas durin_e constniction without
written permission from the property owner.
Ms. Scott brought special attention to a proposed driveway on Parcel 2, which is being added for that
property owner. Bobby Fulghum will communicate with the property owner on the exact location and
determine any need for a driveway pipe.
UTILITIES
BellSouth - BellSouth will abandon its underground telephone lines prior to date ofavailability. There is a
guy wire to be moved. Resident Engineer will talk with them in the near future about getting these issues
resolved prior to June 6.
Tri-County EMC - Tri-County EMC has relocated its lines and poles. Span wire will need to be moved
after completion of project. Guy wire is down off the poles at the present time.
ASPHALT PAVEMENTS
Mr. Andy Pridgen, Division QA Supervisor, asked the Contractor if he had any questions of the Special
Provisions outlined on pages 26 thru 43.
Mr. Pridgen advised that the Special Provisions in this contract are dated 01!18!05.
The Contractor advised that Barnhill would perform paving on this project.
The Contractor was reminded that the use of a separator medium beneath the layer to be tested is
prohibited.
Density testing is to be done on wedging.
Attention was called to Article 609-6 of the Standard Specifications. In Item 5, under Plant Mix Quality
Assurance, add "at a frequency equal to or greater than 10 percent of the QC sample frequency".
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 3
Insert the following after Item 4 under Density Quality Assurance:
5. By periodically directing the recalculation of random numbers for the
Quality Control core or nuclear density test locations. The original
QC test locations may be tested by QA and evaluated as verification
tests.
Cores will be used by Contractor.
The Contractor will repair any dam ee naticed by hauling eni,rinmem arrncc ctnv h_1rFK at nn ?dditinnil rnct
to the Department. r J
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL
Preconstruction Conference is being held from the proposal. Any of the Special Provisions not covered will
be as stipulated in the contract.
Contract Time aid Liquidated Damages - The date of availability for this contract is May 2, 2005 except
that the Contractor shall not close NC 403 to traffic before June 1, 2005.
The contract completion date is November 15, 2005.
The liquidated damages for this contract are $2,000.00 per calendar day.
Construction Aforatoriurn - No in-water work will be conducted between Febraarv 15 and June 15
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise - It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises shall have the opportunity to participate in the performance of
contracts financed in whole or in part by federal fafnds in order to create a level playing field.
The Contractor is also encouraged to give every opportunity to allow DBE participation in
Supplemental Agreements.
The Contractor's EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer is Brent Sloan.
The Resident Engineer fLmished the Contractor with required posters for his bulletin board. The
Contractor's EEO Policy Statement is to be posted on the project's Bulletin Board, which should be
weatherproof, along with the following posters:
1. Davis-Bacon Minimum Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule
2. Wage-Rate Information - F/A Project, Form PR-1495
3. Notice Relating to False Statements, Form PR-1022
4. EEO Poster - Discrimination is Prohibited
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 4
The Contractor is urged to document, in writing, all actions taken in complying with Equal Opportunity of
Employment Provisions, Training Provision, and Mnority Business Enterprise Provision. This includes
applicant referrals, meeting with employees, on-site inspections, wage evaluation, etc.
All subcontractors and suppliers are responsible for meeting the same requirements as the prime contractor,
and it is the prime contractor's responsibility to oversee that both are in compliance.
All alleged discriminatory violations should be brought to the attention of the Resident Engineer.
The State and/or FHWA will conduct a Contract Compliance Review sometime during the life of this
rAintract Therefore, fair emplo.m,ert practice chpuld he maintained a± aI! times
Reporting Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation - When payments are made to Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise firms, including material suppliers, contractors at all levels shall provide the Engineer
with an accounting of said payments as stipulated at the bottom of page 13 and the top of page 14 of the
contract.
Retainage and Prompt Payment - The Department will not deduct and hold any retainage from the Prime
Contractor on this project. The Department will withhold an amount sufficient to cover anticipated
liquidated damages, as determined by the Engineer. Contractors at all levels, prime, subcontractor, or
second tier contractor, shall within 7 calendar days of receipt of monies, resulting from work performed on
the project or services rendered, pay subcontractors, second tier subcontractors, or material suppliers, as
appropriate. This seven-day period begins upon knowledgeable receipt by the contracting firm obligated to
make a subsequent periodic or final payment. These prompt payment requirements will be met if each firm
mails the payment to the next level firm by evidence of postmark within the seven-day period.
The Contractor's requested estimate period for this project will be the last day of the month.
Domestic Steel and Iron Products - All steel and iron products which are permanently incorporated into this
project shall be produced in the united States except minimal amounts of foreign steel and iron products
may be used, provided the combined project cost of the bid items involved does not exceed one-tenth of one
percent (0.1 percent) of the total amount bid for the entire project, or $2,500.00, whichever is greater. This
minimal amount of foreign produced steel and iron products permitted for use by this Special Provision is
not applicable to fasteners. Domestically produced fasteners are required for this project.
Submission of Records - Federal Aid Projects - The Contractor's attention is directed to the Standard
Special Provisions entitled "Required Contract Provisions - Federal Aid Construction Contracts" contained
elsewhere in this proposal form.
This project is NOT located on the National Highway System; therefore, federal form FHWA-47 is not
required.
Contractor Borrow Source - If the Contractor proposes a borrow source, the environmental assessment
shall include wetlands and stream delineation extending 400 feet beyond the proposed borrow source limits.
Contractor will use commercial site (probably the Whitfield pit).
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 5
Attention was called to pages 17 and 18 regarding submittals that are required if wetlands or streams are
present within 400 feet of the borrow source. If wetlands or streams are present within 400 feet and the
Contractor does not propose to excavate below the seasonal high water table or the water level in the
adjacent stream, no documentation will be required. If wetlands or streams are not present within 400 feet,
no additional documentation will be required.
Plant Pest Quarantines - This project is in counties regulated for fire ants. If the project or any part of the
Contractor's operations are within a quarantined area, thoroughly clean all equipment moving out of the
quarantined area. Comply with federal/state regulations by obtaining a certificate or limited permit for any
reeulated article moving from the quarantined area
Safety Vests - All Contractors' personnel, all subcontractors and their personnel, and any material suppliers
and their personnel must wear an OSHA approved, reflective vest or outer garment at all times while on the
project. Ms. Johnson advised that non-reflective orange shirts are acceptable for all project personnel
except flaggers.
PROJECT SPECUL PROVISIONS
ROADWAY
Clearing and Grubbing - Perform clearing on this project to the limits established by Method III shown on
Standard No_ 200.03 of the Roadway Standards.
The property owner will have no right to use or reserve for his use any timber on the project. All timber cut
during the clearing operations is to become the property of the Contractor and shall be either removed from
the project by him, or else shall be satisfactorily disposed of as stipulated in the contract.
Road?tiay Ercavation - Install erosion control measures as required by the plans prior to any kind of land-
disturbing activity.
Shoulder and Fall Slope Material - Required shoulder and slope construction for this project shalt be
performed in accordance with applicable requirements of Section 226 of the Specifications except as
follows:
Construct the top 6" (150mm) of shoulder and fill slopes with soils capable of supporting vegetation.
Provide soil with P.I. greater than 6 and less than 25 and with a pH ranging from 5.5 to 6.8. Remove stones
and other foreign material 2" (50mm) or larger in diameter. All soil is subject to testing and acceptance or
rejection by the Engineer.
Material shall be obtained from within the project limits or an approved borrow source.
Reinforced Bridge Approach Fills - The Contractor is to be guided by the Special Provisions and all work
shall be done in the presence of the Engineer.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 6
Construction Surveying - Provide a stake out of areas where an environmental permit is required prior to
performing any construction in or adjacent to these areas. Stake out limits of the permitted work areas
according to the approved permit drawings. Provide clear delineation by use of pink or other highly visible
flagging. Insure that construction limits do not exceed approved, permitted work areas. Immediately notify
the Resident Engineer of any variations of the stake out limits when compared to the approved permit
drawings. Surveying will be done by Sanford.
Traffic Control - Rigid sign retroreflective sheeting requirements for Types VII, VIII and IX
fluorescent are described in Tables 1089-A, 1089-B and 1089-C. Cover the entire sign face of the
sien substrate with WCDOT ?ppreved T;mP V111, VIII or T?X fluorescent orange reflective
sheeting. Apply the reflective sheeting in a workmanlike manner so that there are no bubbles or
wrinkles in the material.
lI•ork Zone Signs (Stationarv) - Use Types VII, VIII or IX fluorescent orange retroreflective sheeting that
meets the requirements in Tables 1089-A, B and C shown on pages 49 and 50 of the proposal. Use
approved composite or aluminum for sign backing. Signs and sign supports must meet or exceed NCHRP
350 Requirements for Breakaway Devices.
EROSION CONTROL
The Project Inspector for DOT will give the Contractor a weekly erosion control list advising Contractor of
items that need to be done in a timely manner.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas - This project is located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. This
designation requires special procedures to be used for clearing and grubbing, temporary stream crossings;
and grading operations within the area identified on the plans. This also requires special procedures to be
used for seeding and mulching and staged seeding within the project.
The "Environmentally Sensitive Area" shall be defined as a 50' (16 meter) buffer zone on both sides of the
stream (or depression) measured from top of stream bank (or center of depression). Contractor may perform
clearing but grubbing cannot be performed until Contractor begins grading operations. Erosion control
devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
Once grading operations begin, work will progress in a continuous manner until complete. All construction
within these areas must progress in a continuous manner such that each phase is complete and areas
permanently stabilized prior to beginning of next phase.
Temporary erosion control measures should be installed as soon as Contractor begins to disturb the soil and
permanent seeding should be established as soon as possible.
Crimping Straw Mulch - Crimping shall be required on this project adjacent to any section of roadway
where traffic is to be maintained or allowed during construction. In areas within six feet of the edge of
pavement, straw is to be applied and then crimped. After the crimping operation is complete, an additional
application of straw shall be applied and immediately tacked with a sufficient amount of undiluted,
emulsified asphalt.
Preconstruction Conference 1Minutes
B-4320
Page 7
Straw mulch shall be of sufficient length and quality to withstand the crimping operation.
Safety Fence - The work of safety fence shall consist of furnishing, installing and maintaining polyethylene
or polypropylene fence along the outside riparian buffer, wetlands or water boundary, located within the
construction corridor, to mark the areas that have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetlands or
water, and as directed by the Engineer, in accordance with the Special Provisions. The fence shall be
installed prior to any land disturbing activities.
Delineation will be done by the Contractor. He was reminded that this does not have to be orange but
should be hiehly visible.
Gravel Construction Entrance - The filter fabric shall meet the requirements of Section 1056 for Type 2
Fabric. Stone shall be Class A Stone and shall meet the requirements of Section 1042 for Stone for Erosion
Control, Class A.
Katie Simmons reminded the Contractor that stage seeding should be done as soon as possible after grading.
Silt ditches should not have vertical side slopes. Make sure all erosion control measures are installed
correctly.
She advised the Contractor that erosion control flip guides were available for his use.
STRUCTURES
Kevin Bowen covered this portion of the contract
There was some discussion about the possibiiiry of beaver dams at the site of the bridge. A beaver specialist
has checked and found no beavers. There is no way to lower the water level at the bridge site.
Bottom of caps will not be at water level. Should be 1 ` below the bottom of the caps.
Kevin Bowen will talk with ;Mike Robinson about a potential change to the proposed joint design. This may
involve eliminating the backer rod and sealant and replacing with grout.
The interior bent caps will have to be widened to accommodate a minor design flaw with the reinforcing
steel. This is a minor change.
The approach slab is larger than normal (25 feet).
Crane Safety - Submit all items listed in Crane Safety Submittal List to the Engineer prior to beginning
crane operations. Changes in personnel or equipment must be reported to the Engineer prior to continuing
with crane operations.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 8
PERMITS
Mrs. Johnson advised that the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDENR have issued permits for this
project, and the Contractor shall comply with all applicable permit conditions during construction of this
project.
Kevin Bowen will contact Chris Underwood to determine if this project should have a buffer certification.
(Since the meeting, Mr. Bowen has confirmed that there are no buffers on the Cape Fear River.)
Agents of the permitting authority will periodically inspect the project for adherence to the permits.
Should the Contractor propose to utilize construction methods (such as temporary structures or fill in
waters and/or wetlands for haul roads, work platforms, cofferdams, etc.) not specifically identified in the
permit (individual, general or nationwide) authorizing the project, it shall be the Contractor's responsibility
to coordinate with the appropriate permit agency to determine what, if any, additional permit action is
required. The Contractor shall also be responsible for initiating the request for the authorization of such
construction method by the permitting agency. The request shall be submitted through the Engineer. The
Contractor shall not utilize the construction method until it is approved by the permitting agency. The
request normally takes approximately 60 days to process; however, no extensions of time or additional
compensation will be granted for delays resulting from the Contractor's request for approval of construction
methods not specifically identified in the permit.
The Contractor should contain his work within the footprint shown on the plans. Any deviation would be in
violation of the permits.
All standard procedures will be implemented to avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
To avoid adverse impacts to spawning populations of fish species at this project site, no in-water work will
be conducted between February 15 and June 15.
Bridge deck drains will not discharge directly into Northeast Cape Fear River and will not be located
waterward of the Rip Rap alignment under the bridge
No bridge demolition debris, or excavated or fill material, will be placed at any time in any wetlands or
surrounding waters, outside the alignment of the fill area indicated on the work plans.
The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials, within waters or vegetated
wetlands, is not authorized.
All excavated materials will be confined above normal high water and landward of regularly or irregularly
flooded wetlands, behind adequate dikes or retaining structures, to prevent spillover of solids into any
wetlands or surrounding waters.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-4320
Page 9
All measures will be taken to avoid any temporary fill from entering into Northeast Cape Fear River from
bridge demolition. Bridge demolition shall follow NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction
and Maintenance Activities, dated August 2003, and incorporate NCDOT policy entitled Bridge Demolition
and Removal in Waters of the United States, dated September 20, 1999.
The permittee shall provide USACE with appropriate maps indicating the locations of proposed borrow or
waste sites as soon as the permittee has that information. NCDOT shall require its contractors to complete
and execute reclamation plans for each waste and borrow site and provide written documentation that the
reclamation plans have been implemented and all work is complete. This documentation will be provided to
the Corps of Engineers within 30 days of the completion of the reclamation work
Resident Engineer will furnish permit drawings to the Contractor.
Contractor was advised not to grub or clear any vegetation unless it is absolutely necessary.
Old bridge deck will be sawed and hauled back to Sanford. Asphalt will be hauled away by Barnhill for
recycling. Piles will be broken off. Creosote that is broken up will be hauled to Sampson County.
There were no further questions and/or comments and the meeting was adjourned
S A_ TORD CONTRACTORS, INC.
511816?5- Adz::-
DATE APPROVED NAIVE AM) TITLE ?/ic,E ?fc?•or.T? ?3R. oc? o?? r%?
08-05-'04 15;48 FROM-DENR-EEP 9197152219 T-412 P06 U-870
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Mr. Michael Bell
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27789-1000
Dear Mr. Bell:
A77A
WDENK
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Ecosystem Enhancement
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
August 5, 2004
ID
b
Project: Bridge Replacement over NE Cape Fear River, NC 403
TIP#: B-4320
County: Wayne/Duplin Counties, SICP Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide 1.30 acres of riverine wetland stream preservation as compensatory
mitigation at a 10:1 ratio for the 0.13-acre of unavoidable riverine wetland impacts of the subject
project. The preservation site that will be debited for this mitigation is:
Great Cohaire Site (Sampson county) 1,30 acres
The subject TIP project is listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement among .
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, and the U, S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
dated July 22, 2003. The compensatory mitigation for the project will be provided in accordance
with Section IX, EEP Transition Period, of the Agreement.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at [phone].
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E,
Transition Manager
cc: Phil Harris, Office of Natural Environment, NCDOT
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
Pile: B-4320
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
AUG-5-2004 THU 14:25 TEL:[phone] NAME:DWQ-WETLANDS P. 6
_,
0 ?0370
Pe UKW
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Ecosystem Enhancement
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 5, 2004
Mr. Michael Bell
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, North Carolina 27789-1000
Dear Mr. Bell:
WETLANDS/401 GRGUp
A UG 0 9 .1004
WATER QUALITY SECT10?1
Project: Bridge Replacement over NE Cape Fear River, NC 403
TIP#: B-4320
County: Wayne/Duplin Counties, SICP Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide 1.30 acres of riverine wetland stream preservation as compensatory
mitigation at a 10:1 ratio for the 0.13-acre of unavoidable riverine wetland impacts of the subject
project. The preservation site that will be debited for this mitigation is:
Great Cohaire Site (Sampson County) 1.30 acres
The subject TIP project is listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement among
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
dated July 22, 2003. The compensatory mitigation for the project will be provided in accordance
with Section IX, EEP Transition Period, of the Agreement.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at [phone].
Sincerely,
e" 4 0-e
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Transition Manager
cc: Phil Harris, Office of Natural Environment, NCDOT
J"° sy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4320
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer

A ILFI-KWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor
August 5, 2004
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: Project: Bridge 24 over NE Cape Fear River, NC 403
TIP Number: B-4320, Wayne/Duplin County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide compensation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by
you in a letter dated June 7, 2004, the impacts are located in CU 03030007 of the Cape Fear
River Basin in the Southern Inner Coastal Plain Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Riverine Wetland Impacts: 0.13 acre
As stated in your letter, the subject project is listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of
Agreement among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The ecosystem enhancement for the subject project
will be provided in accordance with Section IX, EEP Transition Period, of this agreement.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Transition Manager
cc: Mike Bell, USACE-Washington
John- fkF' y, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4320
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652 NOrthCarOlina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/ Naturally
r

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GovERNoR
March 5, 2004
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000 0 4 0 3 7 0
Washington, NC 27889-1000
ATTENTION: Mr. Mike Bell
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
MAR 8 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Subject: Nationwide 23 Permit Application for the Replacement of Bridge No. 24 over
Northeast Cape Fear River on NC 403, Wayne/Duplin Counties, Federal Aid Project
No. BRSTP-403(3), State Project No. 8.1331801, TIP B-4320, Division 4.
Please find enclosed three copies of the project planning report for the above referenced project.
Bridge No. 24 will be replaced in the existing location with a cored slab bridge, approximately
105 feet in length with a 40-foot clear roadway width. The structure will provide two 12-foot
travel lanes with eight feet of lateral clearance on each side. The new approach roadway will
provide two 12-foot travel lanes with eight feet grass shoulders. A design speed of 60 mph will be
provided.
There are jurisdictional wetlands associated with this project with impacts totaling 0.13 acres. Of
these impacts, 0.12 acres is mechanized clearing, and mitigation is required. Surface waters will
not be impacted by the construction of the bridge.
The Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will be implemented, as
applicable.
The bridge will be built using top-down construction. No causeway or work pad will be needed,
and thus there will be no temporary impacts from construction access.
During construction, traffic will be maintained by an off-site detour. This detour will utilize SR
1937/1558, SR 1559, NC 55, and NC 403.
.4 .
Bridge Demolition
Bridge Demolition: The superstructure of Bridge No. 24 is a reinforced concrete deck on timber
joists. The substructure consists of end bents and three interior bents all consisting of timber caps
on timber piles. Four of the piles on all the bents have concrete jackets. The existing four-span
structure is 70 feet long with a 24-foot clear roadway width.
There is the potential for pieces of the concrete deck and the concrete jackets to be dropped into
the "Waters of the United States". The resulting temporary fill associated with the replacement of
Bridge No. 24 is approximately 40.4 cubic yards. Best Management Practices for Bridge
Demolition and Removal will be implemented.
As noted in the project's CE document, NCDOT will observe an in-stream construction
moratorium from February 15 to June 15.
Compensatory Mitigation
The necessary compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to waters that are
jurisdictional under the federal Clean Water Act will be provided by the Ecosystem enhancement
program (EEP). The offsetting mitigation will derive from an inventory of assets already in
existence within the same 8-digit cataloguing unit. The NCDOT has avoided and minimized
impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent possible. The remaining, unavoidable
impacts to 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetlands will be offset by compensatory mitigation
provided by the EEP program.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered
and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the
endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2003, the U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) lists the following federally-protected species for Wayne and Duplin
Counties (Table 1).
Table 1. Federally-protected Species for Wayne/Duplin Counties
Common Name Scientific Name County Conclusion Status
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Wayne & Duplin No Effect Endangered
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis Duplin N/A T(S/A)
Endangered - A taxon "which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range"
(Endangered Species Act, Section 3).
T(S/A) - Indicates the species is threatened due to similarity of appearance.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: This project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not anticipate
requesting an individual permit but propose to proceed under a Nationwide 23 as authorized by a
Nationwide Permit 23 (67 FR 2020; January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 401 General Certification number 3403 will apply to this
project. In accordance with 15A NCAC 211, Section .0500(a) we are providing two copies of this
application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division
of Water Quality, for their review.
A copy of this permit application will be posted on the DOT website at:
hftp://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Permit.htmi.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Chris Underwood at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Gregory J. orpe, PhD, Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (2 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. John Sullivan, FHWA
Mr. Anthony W. Roper, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Project Planning Engineer
® t17' .®
111 13
I
?J
I11 O
\
\ 1
13
`?
\
\ 41
O ® ®
\\
\ 11 24
41 111
SEE INSET O +
.
BELOW 50
-
- - ®' t1 0
WAYNE/DUPLIN COUNTY 5O
41
/
•
J ?
i 1915

1932 1745

1937 1 55 ••

WAYNE

1 .J
17_45
• , DUPLIN p Pwd COUNTY 1932
' ' t:OUNTYBEGIN
1558 PROJECT

+ 1 4
,1559
° •'
'
403 ?
1 ?
t
• END i
1004,.._. ,
. PROJECT
.
IZ2

/
-?
15

?Pe Feat
403 - ?
•
• 3
YS•1Q .

i ?
Liu i 155033 0

1004 0
c
? . .
i 15

N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE/ DUPLIN COUNTY
SCALE
.5 0 1 Mlle PROJECT: 81331801 (B-4320)
BRIDGE NO. 24
ON NC 403 OVER
NE CAPE FEAR RIVER
SHEET A- OF ? 9 / 23 / 03
If f I
47.5 I
I
I ( ?.\? ? 1 ? 1pI ? ' I
it, 40*
I - " ? - - • Mill ... -?. \?„ ;':? ?.
I
\, ( (11 1
1745
? - 11 I
11 / p?
Po o Williams i
??S\ ._j.\.? ?. • Stables J
I ^ CBE CO`• _ `\\?/ `Cem 1754
' j - PAIN ""?C?- _ -? ` ?• „'? 1 ?I
- -ail- \ =. ,?`'... o ?•\ J I
? / j ¢ ;;u ) t o ? I
-= SITE
? r l..-? Fpm, ?
40
-
. r
Branch
?? ~1) 1 Q 34 \ l
?, Q I, ? . ate` ?-?•ep^__?, ?\?? ? /fi??) ? . '?`y- _ -?-??r -? - -_
// p ? 1901 ?..,? i !:? V ? ) \ ?,%'"'? : ? "?-• .'?'- ?- ." -- ? _:-*e. .-?` _ r'-- -- ? - ?
\ ?' 03 I I
42.5
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE/DUPLIN COUNTY
PROJECT-81351801 (B-4320)
1000 0 2000 BRIDGE NO. 24
ON NC 403 OVER
?? - - NE CAPE FEAR RIVER
SHEET ^f OF-! 09 / 23 / 03
--•WLB ---- WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND
-- WLB'
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
T T DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
TS DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
* * * * DENOTES MECHANIZED
* * ** * * * CLEARING
- BZ - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE
E- -? FLOW DIRECTION
TB -- TOP OF BANK
-°WE- EDGE OF WATER
- C-- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
F-- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
A PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG = - NATURAL GROUND
- - ?- - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED.
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB EXIST. D
PL NT ENDANGERED.
-••-? ••-••-•• WATER SURFACE
XXXXX LIVE STAKES
C?D BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
LEGEND
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
0 SINGLE TREE
?`?- • • WOODS LINE
® DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
' RIP RAP
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE/DUPLIN COUNTY
' PROJECT: 8.1331801 (B-4320)
BRIDGE NO. 24
ON NC .03 OVER
NE CAPE FEAR RIVER
SHEET 3 OF 9/23/03

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTNffiNI' OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 5, 2004
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 24699-1652
Dear Sir:
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: The Replacement of Bridge No. 24 over Northeast Cape Fear River on NC 403,
Wayne/Duplin Counties, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-403(3), State Project
No. 8.1331801, TIP B-4320, Division 4.
NCDOT requests that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) provide
confirmation that we are willing to provide compensatory mitigation for the above-mentioned
project in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed July 22, 2003 by the
USACE, the NCDENR, and the NCDOT. Bridge No. 24 will be replaced in the existing location
with a cored slab bridge, approximately 105 feet in length with a 40-foot clear roadway width.
The structure will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with eight feet of lateral clearance on each
side. The new approach roadway will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with eight feet grass
shoulders. A design speed of 60 mph will be provided.
There are jurisdictional wetlands associated with this project with impacts totaling 0.13 acres.
Of these impacts, 0.12 acres is mechanized clearing, and mitigation is required. Surface waters
will not be impacted by the construction of the bridge.
We have avoided and minimized the impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent
possible as described in the permit application. A copy of the permit application can be found at
http://www.ncdot.org/planning/ye/naturalunit/Applications.htm]. The remaining impacts to
jurisdictional resources will be compensated for by mitigation provided by the EEP program. We
estimate that 0.13 acres of coastal plain, bottomland hardwood, riverine wetlands will be
impacted.
The project is located in the coastal plain Physiographic Province in Wayne/Duplin Counties in
the Cape Fear River basin in Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 03030007.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Mike Bell at U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office, P.O. Box 1000, Washington, NC 27889-1000. Mr. Bell's
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WESSITE WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed, the NCDWQ
requires a formal letter from EEP indicating their willingness and ability to provide the
mitigation work requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a letter of
confirmation be addressed to Mr. John Hennessy of NCDWQ with copies submitted to
NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Chris Underwood at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Gregory J. orpe, PhD, Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (2 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. John Sullivan, FHWA
Mr. Anthony W. Roper, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Project Plann
i
4
ESSSSSESSSS
-12
to s
m
0
m
z v
o m
nm ::Ieo
r V) M.. 0
m ?m
a r cn
Z,= n o?
a Nr
z
N Z
m
v
ih
a?
ai
i=
og
y
rn
I
OWN mm
4a
Fa
?3 a
n y°,
9
a ?

0
N
Al
rn
m
z
Q
r
x
m I
Fob
o

Izzl=tznl 01
SSS
SSS
a<e
S SSTS I
S$S$$$
IcFR ' IMF$$$$$
S$$$$SOGN$S$$$$$$$$$S$$$$
MF S

i

i i
I

V I

I!

I

I 110
00
0

?

?
-

.....

,
_._,,.. ...: 1'
NMI!

... { , . ,
-._:.__7_...:..i... ..,..,._.r, y.._., 'I

.
.:
!
}

li;
. r i!
1H

III itii Ilt
. ?, . i «.

r i

?

} . !!

!
1 .

1

. ?.

..?.. I

. i

i i -I

i

._.t-

:
:
) i

. .-I. I

1i!
..}.I ..,
.•.. .?.?. '1

' .1
:
: _

... ! I

71

:L':..

7

IT I

-

.«

. 1

. ,

: I

t'

:

:a

_

3..:_

L.

.i

_

t.i-._

.-. 'I

.. i

i

_
.
.. ... .. ........
..... -.. .. .......1 ... ...., . ...._.
, . ,.. ! . :. .... I..... .. _.
.. ..«... ,
.... _+_ .

? i.. {_ ._I..,_: :
-'-3

?.:.
.y..... " -1...
-1- . t
_!_
.
.....i
W
...
HA _

}

.

:..

...

. _..I....

......1..

;....?. i

. _l..

1

?

-'••

_

?

_ _ _ _

_

? _ J-

. ..

.

_ _

__ L.

..r

'-

_

?

1

' - -

# t.

I. •. •..i.

i.

..?

- _ _

:

I ...i.. _

t ..

..,
# : I : f , ; I . , r , : ! 1. : r
.. ....
...i ..
.. .. .... .t.{.. .i : : ....: ._i :., ..._ ..
...
..
...
.....
....
. :
.. : : ..i. .. :. _.t.

1 L . ......

r ,... .

- i

?

J l

: am

?
JJ
1 ? J„
{
• l i
; 1.I: ,.: r_i r
.IIr :..,, !., , rf
. t r
,,
. t
a t
..1
..
a:
,_
1'
:
..i.
,,
?
?
:.1? i
I
?
.
:?
.
?
?

f - _r
i
'fi 14
,
..
;
.
.. ., ,. :.:, t..,. .,.. . ! :. :1 . •!f:.1.: .`i. :. t.i. t .1..1 :!? ..}t -..}: ... .,. i.i '.f i-: # ... ...i .. ':1:. :. .? ..?: }..i . - -1 : . .. ?1'il -? 1' O
n 0 7r m Ill :7 :T: 1: 1'.
l l T.
H T : ' 111 : 1,
T,

,!: ,..; !.

i:!:

'I I I

I I

,I

I

?mrnxx2 i fl ..

!• I T.

f

.,.
1
.

f

.t.

til

1

}
L

4
-7-

....

L.
..... r. -, .

..- „ :7....
• . , ...._:.i.i._. ;. _.

..:.. i.
_

..i .......
. _ «.:

t.... ,.t ......;
,?
t
4i.r

.

i x x 2
lam/! y .t::.._:

:..

.:

.

}.

t:

.,_

"

i

t

I:t 1 :. : ....::.... t^
?Q? dam

i. i

.

?. Y

} 1. 1....F

i
. I. ! I ! i t
.......I. ..... .; ..i r .... ..... ......
1
..}.?i'i
i

i

:

j

a

I

'

t
'

I

f ,

I

x
t

t

' i

:

t
i

i
..

(

I

I
._
I
T

f
:

i...`.

i

i

t

L._.j....L

...
....I

.... ...,.
:....

,.:.... ....:. ;.:. , i ._ ?.,. '

.. . {
I .._
I
!
.}. I": ._
_L3.

,.r. . a : «. a{.,

.•. ..+

!-.
.}

.
t
,

("?
1
.

..

'
, .. .t

...

.
..
{.:
?

}
, •

• , , , ,, ! . ! ; . , ; . # ; .:

, , , , , , ;,, .. ! • t } .
1

, . . h , r
. ._....... _

I i • . , , : ?• : ..
.. __ .. ._........... _

I Y r ; ; ' f ..,... r

t ,

1, .#.

t'1 F...i.... ._....} .... U U N II 4 U U it II '
I

z)
tv Co n ? ..}......
.

} '.
.r....,

t .....

? {..

?I
_ '.f"'
1

::;..

;:.:::.:..,...,
3..
..

-
-

-

:'

::

::

...........
L
I t:

t

.
T _:
.. r.:.
b
a

i' t I'1

. ? ;
„ :.

...:. , .. :. I !. ,

. ,.

.. _....

i !., .. (-i t I . :

7.

.._

.,.

1 .

1

.

..,

..

vl

3 ?:.

.:

t?

«.

-

1

1
??
? .

.. i ; ... i ; .:: :...: I' t : ; i i , i t . .,.r. .i.y.l.... t..' ....{. S. .,_ .'
..j
.,
. ,.
. }..
-
,
.:..
.I..
-
..F.
.
-
_
!.
t.
: 1-
.
..}
..i
i F
f

.

.
„

:.............. i;
,,..,.,.1.,.,, :

r..,.,_N.,..r .....;...,._..,..,..
.!.._

._.r,..

..1 -_.,....._

.i-4..r,..,.1.,..1.....?

-

..,_ i

?

?

_

..1..

..

_

_

.

1

I

y

i

r

-

;

y

S

_

,!..1.:

t:, ..1.I .
1

.....

-..
{-
i

t _

I.

.

i....
t

. :1

t

? 7

t

. .

?

_r:
y
:

_:

k

'

?
..:. • .... .:...... :. 1.... ...} .. . . .:. ... . . .•... ._. .., :..:...
,., , .., •.....t .
t
f :
.. _t . »..1 ...;_
1 .. . 1.., ....
.
.
i
T 1.;
} 1 } .;... ..r.. .a }_ I f"
r 't ' • i : 1
....

j"F ..!_!.. _.........;_.....,......_..,...,..
_.....

? __........ .....:......., .. ...
..
.. . ...... .....+ ...:_ ..
_ ...: ...... .... ..... ..... .. .
.. .. .._.,_
..

?
t

4..

-4l

:

:

'

:

`

u.

I
. ..:....
.. .
. . .: . :. . . !
, .. .. L.... } , , , •
, .
1 .. I I { r l
. r
1
t
i t
• t
t t ' i
' _
? .Y1 {
j
is
:
•: 1..
?: . ...,.. .. .}_ .}.. ..... . . _ ... ..... .,.. _c. ... ..i_ ..
.
1
# ..} ..__:. ....i..
? 7 11

. . . . ...
;_! ........t.:......:..r
:. ..... _:..,.. -F i ' 1 ,.
._. ....
..._? - ;
...
-h.'......I
.r., - .
.
-3..3...,..,.:.
.. .t..
-
..# _.,.. #.'' ',..!....1
.
. ..
_r" ..?
+
..._7

- ..1-

...... y

..... 1

...

..

.1`

">-

t. .

....{..?.. .

.. .:

.i_•

1`•

'. .?.

..}

..

.?..

.

.y_l-

. ? _

_.. _, ..

.. _:_ .

.'
'1_ ... ?.?:.....

..F

.. ..

1

:

:.

.

.

_ .

..

..

.

..

,_

_

_

.

??.. ..

{

.C.,

,.

1. .,

4

.

.. }..-

1 ...,.

4 y
t r-1__ • . -;-i__

MmAt.

,

-

C

1

.

t F
1
? _i..
+ i
+ _...

t ;

-

-
---
. ' _

?

Y'

, ?-.
-

-

i
-I

.?

_?

.

.1 ..F.t

- -i..:

^
!-

?

'
?'

?
?

_

'

?

?'

•

?

?t •

i ?

-

"
?i i. {-

Y i

i
,-•--`
.` 1_t ? + . ? y _{ _i. f }
.I- _
i i

O : I •

i tl ' +-^,1,

I f ! E I I :

}
t i

1

!

K

I -

'I }

T "

' ! i _ -

r / t , 11 ? C _

t

r _

. -r _ - _ : i.

I r

F ,

L.i.

? ++

! _rj

! "t- yfi _!

}{
-
. _ ^l

r

•

t..,......:.,. __ .:
1 1 : 1•• .tt. .1....
......:.. 4.J..
;. i.... -}..1.. , .

...(} -F
...i
..(.+. .1

..r.i •

..i..,... ..

.,..?

.... l.. . ..t

}...

1

'.t

.
i..

? _4 .

::.. 7. .

r.

...:: _

:.r:

;
a:. _ . ..!- .{
: ._i.
.1:
i..,..{ i

.. '-h

}..}..

.. t
L::. ;
.:!
,. _
A..
_

i.

A
' .}
1-
.

71

TV
f/l 1
I
'

m

-r -: ? ? .. . _'. t.. ..l_ .t.. .. .
- 1. . 1 #
.
.

L
i 0. ! t
i v i
+i t r- _
_i
?
?

r .#.i
TRW
i F
.1?
- :?
?
.. i-
r-'
i ?
.__
. '- i I •
•
- '?-
-F
?_ _
.
1_ -
' -k

4
-i-l
-t-
. } t.
..
_
-F i
. t ; i

A

.
;,
PVT
WAS

{........... !

._... {

?.3

rt

...

.

-

{

r

T

'

: Ft

k

i.:.1
v 1
I TIT

. s. 11.1

. t. !JS!

.I

I.

171111 1,

IT
f
t.

,1

1
I

_i ,.';

I
a.
_
_

I
i..
..i.:
-
- .{_
-
t
°
±
3}
t•

I _. k . [ Z - r?t

22 xx
x

.

....

...

.
[

ii

I

.

i

,.t.: , .. ; , . L

i.._

._,.,.

,.,.. . ,

.. } . .. ff

f .. r.1:.}.;.f

, , .. F . tr

....

r

tf.

, r

f

.

.

..

y

y C?
..

(.
.r::.

,..
.
.

_

.

,.r

r

..

.r

^-r

l + t

-?

K

'# *

-

i.. , . ! .. , .

...,.3 , . , i
1J.

,..,..

. ,. .._}..-.

1.. !.. .. ..4 d.1 1..1..}

.....

f....:
?

... _

T

-7
Oo
454

T

.

C

F

r

i

}

..
..:. i i , , ;
,; ; , ;, ; , , ; ; r i
I
. t
: t ;-F ! t .i .y
_,
'i
. i
.! ..
T... S:

m
.?..
_
_
?,!

_
_
...
_•--
I
: i .
.... , .:: ! ...; ..,..„y_. .. ,._.,.t

,.s.;.. , i

1 ...•_4..,.
1 _....:.I..!........
i ?..!..i..... .;.... ..
I ..r ..1_i.. .
}.

I
...
..

F

... .... t. . C

II a II II on R o n :

n

>
Ma
wc

":.:.

. ..,...

......_ . _

i

..
_

L

:
.'. -_ -?.. .. _ " .r. -

= -- i•

j ..' -} .I-Y _, ,I.}.

i ._ i..

t

!.

. i ,

I

!

I

?

I

!
.I I;i
' ? f .. ?.

t

t
.

_I

I

?.

i_

!

..?. ?8
O
o
c.

b o S
.
i.

r!
1. i
1

1

. I

.

.......?_

.

t
_1

..

1 r

1

r }

.

_ ,

.

1 F

1

,
_.
.
_

?
L:..
i.. , !
?'[_....
:.....i. ! .

,_ . I.1

_ n
q l 3; q ?
to 1A {/I (A

1

i

.

?'
?
..
? T..: i { _
_- t

?

-
, ..:. , :. , :.: ,. ; , "( ! ..,.., ...? •.: ? .!. { .} !..,.. } I , « ? ,. ,... r..,. t .1.. .? ..1. ..... ,. .
.t }...,....... f .i ., .. ?..? ..I. .
.
, .fi....? ...1_ . .., ,.. . r ? I . .I' ? ?'.:: :::: ,. ..:: . I a f-L 1 }. .i ; ..., i r T' ? i
--

r

t....

......

.

t

?

_ ..

.. _

.. _L

.. ..

...

__....

.

.....

..

f

l

Y

•

t

a

i
i

t

}

} : 4

r

i , .... .
i .
1
it K

t t .
+

t

ti

r

..

...

....

.... .

.... .

.
-

,

ff _
_ _
" ..

I_ ..
..
'L: .
..
::1.. ..

- .:

_E. ::I

__

'_:.

...._ ..

_ t

r
}.
it .#.
,
1..
.
.. ..
... ... ..
.. ...
.._ ...
.
.......
....
'

.

..

...

..

..

....
...

...
.

. .
..:.
k:
:::
::
,:

fr 14 ]
.fi..?..
.
..
'
{..
.
.
_J.. ; I T
•
?
?

r -

} V
1 1 -1 v_
t

I

LL
14H :: is
TO 1 i ,
i. i
? I
'
I
{ 1
7 T1
r
i
}
'

,
' 7 T
1
- 1 1 1 - IF
fff

....
.. .

1-

2

- +

t
t

4 (( ? r
,
I
l4 . ..

r 1 , .
7
t
J
T _.. _ .. . . t.
t .
-
f - :

I
-

?
- - r -- ..
r
I
L m u:
I :
...._...
r
_... 71

3.:
t
i

.....r.._.. ..

_:

i

j

_
....
....
....
.
....
t
? : ' i t

_

q ..!'::F:..
! ...... a... ...
i.. 1.. .. i.. t_ _ i.. .. ..i.
-i.. #. . _ _
£+

v
?
H i..{..?..,...;..#.......
.1....1..;
.....i..a......_:_j....
_ ........:......-
.1..
- ..
..1...r....?.i.1 .........
....... _1.:..x..1.
.....
.._..
.
_.
?
....
...
.1
_
-
-;-
-
-
....
. _t.
__
..
...

.._ .

...
_;'
__.
? 1
.:

_...

..

.. _.

:.:.

.
-
_ .
A
T
.}.
..
1 0 110
€

,r
: , , ;
{.r..h..t
.}-......;.., I '
t
t r I ,t
r
,
..t
....I
.. ..
.1
..
1
1.. 4
. .
1....
.,. J- -
r
....
t
111 fil i

:

.
: I-

/.. i

. _ f

.

L.._'

. . . :

i

i

o
3
i
l r r
.
i
:
.

$

x
y
CA
Project No. 8.1331801 (B-4320)
Property Owner List
Parcel Number Name Address
1 Alonza J. Davis
III 514 W. Main St.
, Mt. Olive, NC 28365-1904
2 William H. Farmer
Jr. 235 Pineview Cemetary Rd.
, Mt. Olive, NC 28365
3 Norwood Odom 401 Henderson St.
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAYNE/DUPLIN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1331801 (B-4320)
BRIDGE - NO.24
ON NC 403 OVER
NE CAPE FEAR RIVER
SHEET 4:! OF ? 9 / 23 / 03

m
0
N
N
O

Z

CL ., w
o

F- C) O W
Z
O? 0 m°v>
0- 0
Z
Z O
Z
Q
CC
0
C LL CL
O
N w
LL
z
Z U
0
w
U) -D 0
Z W
W
Q 0 CD Z
O O
LL Ir 0
U CL cc
Z m

(b

L
0

13

w
w
2

(L r U)
0
U) 0-6

cr
.
IL <
m?
w ? F

S r- O O

U. j

M
O
N

a

2
to N .

c LL
N N

E
`
o
U-

05 Z ?

c
m
rn
m
Z c
0
C/ C d
H h ? ld ? O

a a
w U £

W LL O
n to
°
F-
W
U
a

N =o °
co
d o
o

? o
= R °o
LLZ
a

? m ?-
p
C C V p
O Qp
O
L m (a
L ?
?
F" m U CD ° o
?
Q

a X ? o
W c

W O
Z

a
o
?
J -

W
N
V
tC
f6
V O O
C O
m
m CL
7
?
U ?
N

O

O
o

t

?

J
m o J
¢
O
0
2
r o UT
H
,.... F AI
_0 '1t24 [I(CONTRACT,
?-a o 0
T' p ? p ? p
m -v
Z° CA Cn
"? t o O o 0
y
gg
N N
? O O y
N < v < cNi, 14
u u u u n n x
v a w N -•
o A cn o 00 o y
N ? o\° a° a° O O
0
m m
r
m
=g
o
.9
O ° p y
o a
LCA)
C O N
0
0 o p
N N O
3 3, 3,
m y
0 " pir
A w? H fa
mS5 Z em? 3.
N n ro 'Q. a ifi•
G1 `m - O g
Z?D p y X44
m ? =v
5- n
O!Z O m
N m O
Z n m C1
? .. mb o
z a y
m
rn
? o
O
C1 -_
x
x
h
?o
x
? Ox
z
0
z
0
0
T
0
`m
I?
mm
m
23
O
O
3
N
m
v
WC
0
v
r
S?
zr
qz
Z [?
PROTECT: B-4320
n m
c
NO
% %2y
I/ s
N
N
p
S
z
? m
. C.
?,?COfr'``} ? t71 Z 77
\ N
O
D \
N
0
D?
Z
+?
m A
0 W
o '
II
II \
-Zc 0
C rn
A CA
-y?
F ?
O
0
C _
v(A
DDZ
m00
CA
z
all
w L...
O
y
ZI
o x?
w?
SO
V? ? A
1r M'
^ o
Y? ? N
n
. fw
r b
y
a
z
b
!!i
tft-4
OCi
y
00
O j
al
x
o
j ?
g?

00
?i
•t--v'

N
N
V

IJ
?

W W ? 0
w w a

X

64.i20
...?- tyu.dr:
i
tj r N r Fj N
m y N DTI

V a n CD N
++ a ++

0 co r -?
V) L11
00
m
OO
m
00
00
Z O Z Z O p Z

D
?+ O ? O
p N '
a
m O cA
+ + _ D O0
O w 00

Om CC

G1 n ? C)
00 Z CD S x
+ m cn o
X o r m m
°
v m o `
o G
l = i

Z D
m .? n n n X
F
r) m
I
N -?
rn
Z r+
o
Z W
------- - --------------------------
Z ?
o ? IN N
N m _ ?1
.?
c?
D 00
O
m
O
N
r
z
m
n I p?
D D
Zo
N
m
nl x o ? I
O zj D 1 C)
z Zo
0z
v
Z I ?n
z D D
m o I
O M? 4 I
Z O
S
D O
x-n
m m n
LA -
-i C)
S ?7
?n
0
r m
M O
ti
2
v

-o
m
m
O m
X m
v °
z
N z
m
rrl
W m
0
0
v m
m m
r
a D N
n
di a W
C
QQ Ln
"$ 1 3 N
c u
fn
N
n
ti
0

w
C
r m
i y
VI
to
Z
2
m
y
m

c
-I
N
m n
N
f7

< z )0.
,9O
0
DO
v
map
mD
riiO
v
6O

° Z
Gl 7
jg<
m? O
m? v
sZ
mD>
pm7O ?D
m?
O
m
°
N

y

4 m
fil
? ? w Oyy
° to
; 0
? ?m= o.r

'

D
z+
= Nv
Z4 off
R -°
O ? Z
m 0',ZI ;oZ
tnn
p zn
QUO
mz a
rn ,
A -?

vs

N

+ <
M z
?n

_

m
m ? A
70 M rn mAm
v N?^ z
rn C

z A s
Gl H, rri m Om
a
Zan nQ
? C:
m -C
Z nro
0 N
b =mm
j
y ° in
rn
D

->4 ?
S o
m ? m

10
i
Z p
.p C11
D

z
z
z
O
Z ` 9
!1:331 ?
N Z
0
N O
N w
O
O N
O
O N N
O
O
O
- --
O - ?o -_-
D
O
zo
O N -i m
N
O
O
?y O
I \ w
N O
C-00
D -
0
D
F
?m
O D
i ?
Nm
.N

a 'I qv--?-a
(A z
7
IC
I
r
Z r+-)
C1
? I
0
W
rA
0
O ?I

?_ ? a I I
v ? , I
ro
I?
' 1-4
- _-__ -_ ?.? .?.lzl-a( -., <zo'•.d?.3??:-,.r,4aa:?_ds__ti.do.?
M
q ¢ LOCATION (LT,RT, OR al a is
+ + j +®
n? FROM
T , R
STRUCTURE NO. i
TO C t
TOP ELEVATION
r ffi ? S ? QR4?
INVERT ELEVATION s r
O
INVERT ELEVATION F
SLOPE CRITICAL
N
P
m ? In
.064 N
064
a a
.064 q O °' 'r
m N V
.064 • c ? ? EE ? L.
.oT9 ? ? N 8
.079
.109 N m
???,,,,,, u u u u p
15' SIDE DRAM PIPE o
18' SIDE DRAM PIPE T•
24' SIDE DRAIN PPE
q y y Lm m O
R.C.P. 2 3Z2? d ?. u u
C.S.P.
N ?r
PER EACH 10' THRU S.OT POR r
DRAINAGE
STRUCTURES ?y
5.0' THRU 10.0' > CC • TOTAL LF. FOR PAY A+?
10.0' AND ABOVE m Z QUANTITY SHALL BE COL 1y INS t,, ?y
'A' + 0.3 X COL'R'( /? 5 u •
C.B. STD. 640.01 OR STD. 640.01 /05
O NFj ? ? C
O N
IS
s 'b
CONC. FLUME
4
i A
?s
g? a a 3?
to z '^
x? SW
u Yo PIPE REMOVAL
b
s 1?•?cFn
a ?ox° oo-pF
znd0
-1111110g, I
zrso
S^
z x
ti ? ? $Z
s S?
x
0111
p
>
oft ?
w
P y? Z
m J_
P P LI
s 0
p
N
ap
l8
M

o ?
ea
i

T T
P
+
U P
+
W

y
00
w?q?yy ?y.?yy
tar .,ey

4 r g? sr 8
"s s s x c ??

P
P
° W
?
Q
y
p
S ?
a g
R pg
R ? 9
o P E ? `.3 ? ?
C
r b
1
01
of

IW"RUi mi?'1m p
tj .6 P,
All wro?? °wtaq
x
b ti ?P cado yp
A
m ? ok

a ? m ?•
a 1 r
u, w y
?
o
O
t1?
W u

V

r7l
m
?sO
T

x x, \ sto ?p,?
}
4
.r

is
a a
2z rr
> 02
x
if"' p 0
-aj
ix
y ?
O
c?
z 02,
?o
Or
m p
a
A ;
?> N
,VI
o
N

mom' i

M
o
y

a ?' m
a
h
O
Z
?Z
ycyY Q

N ?
Ln
N

A
e
53z 53'0 .
9
596 96
s.4'002 Pr01Ma,02031 043201O 1. %64320..I.M 08/22/03 m
to

R>

'gym
ai
( ?
;n 10,
' 3+
?

. = t-•
,
g
? ?
r
z
m
rr A Z

i 15

Pr
Sfn 19#9R4A
A
trl
E?
1M
_..-1
l.•t?? ? .k
'
F

r, Z
.
w
co
A
boy, .?
+ 3
m
$
?Sc\\
r
20

mlr
(A w
f
A
NOO W.
r Div
T ?1

Pr-C i
i
\T y

o
?
a
O
1
r.
+ C
r
- Nz

gb99a ....? C
\ S9d
? a "•.r.,
w cn a +
.o
•-?+ a + rn
m o c,
w N
O •4
a? rtm
s f.'r YFBF tF tF:FFi =Dii%'I? 9:4 SdJ:F S3.'F i.i.iF
! i I ! I
i

I
j

.. .. ._ ,..-.

.. ... ... _. '..: .... ::.. ..
_ ..:......

• -.. ., .,. l..: :,:. t} i I
j,
j

i

?:-.

._..; _

: I:._.,. !
I

I

(

.....«. } - I
I

i

--r ? ( 1
?? ? i ;

a I

a
i

_h
.. ; :1 (?

, .
.,1-

?1
-1 !II a.i. T1.
: i i ?
??? I

!

!
1 l

I
77,7t

? I:T Fi•'r_ ,', 11

h

li'I'- - it, •_, -I ll: j.
1
j
•
?
? I (
? ?

1

~

t.t.
•..lj _ i ? ? I !
i 1. !? I j?,

1

i

I

I
'}

r .iJ
.k.i.;... I
?
? ? t
.. ,. • ,. I , : ;.. ,. , _ :_ ' T- ;. JT
?
' >_• , ?.,_?
? - T
L;'T ? . ,
_..}... ..
? :i.
L ;=1
t
. - I
--
? .-r t F
.
.:.
? ..;"j: i
T
i; 7 ,
1
t

r
! .:..' ,•,.,. '!'k ,.. .'. k'1.,.

.. ., .:.i .. ,. ..• _'., i

.'I

..l..:. ;...I
1 .. _0

.:. _. it°
?r

J...
..:
t } l i
.

?k
,.
r I-i
+o- : e,,... r ?..,y->• -......,
.{.+.. _

??I, _}.L,, '7?1 t •_r.._1 !i'k fir.
.
?t ,
, i:f
_.?, r--'• .? ,rl.-,,
_j ?..,._, ?Itr.ll?

i

i
;... i :,.
L y 1_.,.:.,_
} ?_ _

,.? .J. i ,_

,.: .:..._._:.._._ ? ....

J.._ }:+.

..........L.

4
._,._._:- {}tL

_..?__ ,_

? aT

.

_; ' t t
.. .it.r.,,
144 0-
! _
T-1
10.
_s.{ _i ;:; :1? (.'t ?
5? -
_ !Ji-: ;?,}_ '-ia.'.';} !t-i :•.

•:L?1.__. ?., fl.,i;
- 1
ni.
L: 1_yt?, i JI Iih
4}. 'a?:
'

~
l-r- r ?! rri i :.L:.

? i 77r1' 7t
°
I
°
°
I1 f - ! '{ t t m
?
( ?g2$SI
?
rn..rnn
?
/
rn ? +;;E'?•
k
?
L-

,_ .. t

-
?

; ! 1

1
jL
?

I
L ] ,.
=
`
rnrn??`?
S +'1: 4?2x
i RiA .
';•,
_ t?
t IJ.: .,
.} i
;i + I } - 1 t 'r t
t k }
]
_-1
?
t

I '?
t t"" j j
t
}}
1 _ r.w
.. *
F {
?L. f
.
! ry
?: L

I

3 M -0
+1 J4? °
?2
° ' rr
O m i
4

t
!

a
'

-;...::.. . 3
°•iN? Z
Jr C-1, rn
rn 1?
r•., r.--r}°i l:?sa * -II xJ it !-iL
TL-.71i L1 ?f? {1 ?? J
''T ,

!
: ., .. :.?
..! ,
?• i'{t: ;?.
1
;..

r
?
rny?
x
t
f
'
??
[:i:
f
r I
t k
k
1
. C7rn
J\
Z
: I L
:{{. r, 1
l
.
..
11 I
, t
' i I.. i I
J ..
+
.... .. i .. ...
' i :
; ?
: . , ..
1_ J ?
i ..
?
1 '--t? ...,.
?-" I? , .. r r
1 ? . ,. I
.; .t n
? C ..
? x
?
! Y •! i "'1 4 : i'r :: i
L 1 7
[_y..,.t [ -, rt f ?
FY't:-rl i ''
r
'
?
t
? r
1
,
17 } ?
Li ? J .'? .' I
I _
... '.. ..: '71 no: I_.. , ?_. ._,„..k _
:.. «_,.. , .
.
._.r,-, ?.,` ?,• ..
_i>{. , x
Z
r l
,}!!J:; -
:
, r
f.
}: ", .5...?.
+ y't?."a - :rr 1? -
:
I
"i.i?' ... i
•
I.T-F +I ;1 -.. ? .?i' ` :1'
1 f
, ',
I
+ ,••'-• i I iii 1 1 / / 1 1 1 P 1 , '. r : 'ri

:..' ..
"-
' ? .

t
i ,:
...'
":
j -

? :- t
5
1..
j
O orr?M`p}?1(}?
?1F?1_ Cb V`V WOtr.,
n
b
i !
'1-r_i-I t?' yr ,L , ? ? If: iL?l't .;?
?'

Y,'? i?

'F .. tt _ ? _ ,?-.' _
. .., _.. _
j
.
.•.- .
. , t
-10

? l
L to
i?l u a
. Rd l I i

' l :
r' :,
1V
To -
_ .,. . .... .::. _.. I . ,. ... t _..-_.._ ......? _;Y., ^t... ( -..5. ?. _....
I
'C n `C
i ->1 64 -

!
,

+
N N
? {
k
_ _ p
Lt I
f`- ? N
Ir}r1. r?Iy
•

.,

}
r.,_r-1r.
. '=ii_;.:
11
q .

_ a.-- ,?J _..-}-;
a
:J+1. _ _f.i r'.+
- ,4?-?.
r

,.1.

.
?

i

t

?
St
1
.1.
t I i
I l

}Ijrl * f
1

?

i
a
I
t
t
:. r ! J L I , t
!
.. _ i .._ .:.: !

. 1 :. ._ "'-'
y
- 1 r I
1.
' 1_Lj.,-..:,
. -,_I r•?L+. ? t ' ' . ? r (. + -? -? ?- - -f-
Ay
.
.,.: 1 :..- :
1
k
I
:
:
? ;j r
I
,
i I'i' '
r
j
1??4
-AIl-
:
J "?
'
I
'
1?
J
r +
{ t
t {'
JON

.

-. .::.. _ ..
._..-

k:.r
.
_ .
.
..
-i....,_ ; :"

:.-
•
..
.
..
.
.., .; ;_!_.,_f.,.i:,'??-!'E-' ?- • i-I-;• )4J.1

.
..
_
.
..
.,
.
,.
{ft??+
7.

Yi i

!i
Q. A

- : ; : .._ ' . -
. _.. , , ::

-. , , • . t
... _.. .. .. 'F' ? . ^I
,.. , .,. , .I

= ...
t.. }
? ?..,..

+ t1 . r+ j
., , . ; I .
y-i ;

y-r-r
?.... I
..?'_?; ?

i.,,_ ?'+^?•+ n? r?• -,-,-j-t?j
"r•i- . ?L+ {_ '., 1 ? !-r I `t I' .t} }.``...I ! r -
t{t
i r r-F' ' -i i:t ,.L'i-.,.. ?-i'

t
? 1-". ALL-rt?
i :?'t..T; +.i, j ? ,.! 't ,?, . J.
'r
r:--f - ?r[ . ':. c. + +i? ::1;

}
l -i-1- t'i?- •r
Y .J '. _ ,-i' •r , •r? I -

'? i {- I t
t `?.I: . i?!.. ' ? .: i i'

A i
i-1::.. ! ,' i I-.
t
,_ Ii"' -.'. •_.-: ,:
J - t ..l- L.
..1:1' i j.l..rL-
k? `` [.. _..I - r. I ?
i_ ?t
? J., l 7'
:'!
: ? , :

? ..; -s T I -:1 r
;1 '1' ;'t.?t- if?_
1 '•1 1, 1
7 1
r Ii ! _
. .. 1. '. .. .._ ..__.: ? ?...: ..L . _:t.:l i?-e } '--•_i '? .>_. ?.. ?..rl ;...?. :.: ):.t:.: ili

:
'-
?
' , IJF. .! t
r
i i l .I
r
A
i
r
.......1 -.
...,_ ,: :._;.;...___. y'_ r'"!---+-
•
=-t-?_..,_.:_? .1
.}_i..:?.r _ .L_d-#.?.•r ',-t
t1 J. _
.t.? _.
.t,?;-
-;'v ! '-r eM. I -r,.i 1 + '? -'. __
W$ •,± _ .r _ _
J. -'
.
.r.
?; .

- -- -• -_-' ,,. ,-•• ` e'

•

1 -!
'

,
_-
rF-f lr'

?-?+ R

sm
is
.
!
!I ! i i:;
-.-._ i - :'___';__ :
' -
-.
. ' •_. .. _ : c ;,._? - • -,
_-?; L.
dT'' ••F+
?_- -? rF: ', I t"+r`? ?}'
.i..'.-t r•r- ?' : f'.}{.: .? i:_?. t +1 k. . 1. r'?t.'i r i ? ,'+{.?
; .?•N i} j. _f.?.._.a.t `:. _,l .?_s}{... 7,?y
r L o? .,-t ; ; i??_ Tt 1 . 1 ,
E tJ-'- ' r r I. ! .'. -i
!

?

t

,

j

jI
!
1
?

4

h
rr 1
1
-
i t ,
.. _..,._ _, _. r .:. - tT I t '_ '+-

t t ? ? - 1? ' ...

? .
_4.-- L 1'i-`" '_' ,-J-"r ,--'-•?
--
'
} 1 +. i. ?
.r_1_t.t
r-i _ { t r_
-1_i-! r rr
i f ?
t•1 T
g ul
I i1 _ t _ =__I d _ ? ? 1 _ _
4? 1
t
?
.'.....:.. .. _. .'........ T
_..., t

k " . ;.1L,___;_

;-
.;
_ !,., •??

T !.?
y_ ;'Ij ''__f_r.l:? }.1
?..._.,.
, ...,?.L..i,_
1' i'r't?t1
•:.:i _ ! r: _ r' '
'
1
?
1
{ F

rr---t .t?_Fa.: >_ t.: _

--• ...t-`T" `? _ L L, r
i
Fly
•'

.. ? .. _. k _ i . .., I Y
._ , ? r
; .:. , \
1
.! .

i J
I .
i,1r -
i ? :
r
?
? !
, , ? f- !•T . t . r
..
} 1
7
? ?
?
?? -J: tt
,
f '. J
:...
L
11
l 1
?
N g
?
'
'
i _

, 1 t .
••+ . ! 1 _
.. i ..:. ? : t , 1 r I :

1
1
t
Z
.. ..,..... .. .. .
,

-

__.x.._ 1 , _ :
71 7w
_ . ?.+ 1

;.

•-
,-, ,.
-..

-1_

-+:::,': -'
Y .

:. L-

_-

'?
1-{ :
-
'- •-t:

:
ti
' _
i'f'; ..

?-: ..
?4r
1-. t
J ?
I- ?? I
I. 1_ ?':a• '17.,,
t r-t`i-t k' I'"
-?.?; ? rte:; r: l? _ r r`t:F.,.i., 'r
??:i. C` .t ,-
""-i..
r "-''r
.
{ I_-t.:.
_

, Q..i
.
1
,,? }
-
?r! ,??, ?,
--
.i _L, .r.:. t+
.+" I I. FY ! 'i f
;..t
?.i a `f. :-F -! ._-{ , t'••-r._'..''.t r t-
'
??

?
j
-
J
1 , 1
}.. i
_ :-' _

1
„ -
- .-
t 1 a Lt i
.1 ..1 .1 - '?
t 'I I k t r I I i
_ _ r I 1 :.t ,.,?. I
I
_. .: ? .... . .... .: ..... : .. : . .. _ v
i ! + i••
...t. - ,. _ "_.. t__.., tr+;...

, : ;. - , _ . ,.. , •

_ . _...... . _... -.. _ _.._. } _.._..?. _..._. i._L_ 3 , '-L_ _:. _
}'
_.: .., :_.

,, ,, -

?}.? : '. L' : ?1.J-;.
,
._.-;'-i-'i

, :. i,-« .

:.+::J
> r
!r?r?
r{

_ _, I-

? :•i-'.
' _I •
f r?
_?

r,

{ ,
,
,
r
v
i f
?i. :. ?=, ! r.L. _ 1_i. ' 1 F' i _
a-f.:.t.1 -t-,-!1-? ? -'-t
-I-'
;.f„' `ti•,-- - __ts
i } . ,. L?;-1:-,- L .1, i , 9r?'i ' _ t _
L._iµ.*l- ...1_?;,?-, ?.i 5?i'.Ltrr ..J?.?.}.a
} ?
'"
?
i !
'
Tier
I(3F? -+J ?_i'1 };._ _{._.t._:,..
'{";+ '7.f....!-:.?-_ ,.I...'..,-•_.t._r:}_
• r
i.- -T ii•
.L. ,.? 5 _, ?.j
' '.N ... i? ? ?,.1...? y? ? ?
trr
(•,_
'
t ?.
I-:, r
_ _

,:..!-:_,-•,--•:. .
r •_'- _ _
? - f r _i
._I.:_'.. :.1 _i..
t
I
•: j...?'. , . , , - -

!- _ ?_...-j - .-,.. }
, -1•:.
-
..1.... .. ...:, ,-
..I .,-. :._?..-.t.. _ _i:.,t.r. _
,.,
:.. _. .. 'I 1 ;: .4 :.
..:.l._: .. .,a0j: ::;J, ..
_....:.t:...._1

:.,:.. _.
....Y-k {.
' ..,"T

--:.+1
J-.-. i.,. t- _,. 1r
L
,. •.i.
. t. r.... . .tT r-F f

11.
T' .
.
fi,..!.,
'r I-, , ,
1T?r ..I .j
1r r
7 7
}I-

....1 .. .. I

,- ,;... i1 :'

t

I -

-,?rr '44
...;..

-*'ry
I . r i _t..
- "L`
., i rJ '..
t
_ ....+.. TL4 I. t +-i ,+'
+_. }.-..C

1-Jr

t, y _! .-F,.rv- 'i'•1'1 '+' !i

r

.J 1
7 7:
-

p p :;`

;
'I

,. { ty_' ;

j
... ._.. _( ._....;.k . - ,-,--
' -- :a.: _.

_...-- "---

-r
-•`}

i">+

,+
-'-
y y
yt-:--.t. m rn m 4? yr Vl
N

-° - 1 - ?
`-i'+-1-
f
?
-
-
T
.
1-'"-' - - - -
?
?
-'
-
T
?
.
Ks

i 1 I

- 1 ., ?

'J ' ,1

{
t
,'
1 ,

t
-'t-
f

???rnmrn
iil Ci)4747
;. 11 at. 000 ?Oxxx ~
C '
'L
?.?, :F ,r I- is l,.it
t + 1 rF 6 L I a, a
?

,
t'r1i
' 1
.'_
r }
;- ;'
. ?.
1
,.•
?j
I; , r 4 + r l ?I
- r _.___ , _..?..
, r. ? ? -.._. _ I.- -..-1 !- ' ? ? 'o ? ? N 17 ° i i r-r:t . : I J_.......+-i ?
- .. ? _r. -•'r_ ?, { r .
' ' t
?' r
- J.; .:.._ ._, , :.._

I
I
,. } y

!
; r
T , ?_,S.L--+-

!
t •'4 •+j 7+'t
-o- ?_r.._T.4.

!__.1 - i

# ..,
l: rl
?.....-, } ?
- ,

•,-4
-
t ? m Z
rn?, °_?z
f 1!.r m\21L7
A
1 y-1. rn Z< rri
M T o } F r .?Y st
-""'y : i:`- :1_f _:,-?
; ; _ r;, `E}L. L k !1

_ r+.:-r L}..,..L;..

I _i.• _-

1'I+ a

-,? ` r-i_T? _ t? , _ _, I. Li
rLr :.i T , ? f
+.:,? + r 1 '

I•-,- J.- ?-1-.. .-r t .1, 1.'.

I

.: ,
`, (- +"i..r4 }
. I..
.. I I.... l
?!
I

,

::
?. , -,-

,. ! tt-ri-_
7
r1t
. -.,.J._

.'•I J_,
I ; ,
-.

.1
J yht o ?
+.t-f --,•-r x

t. .L,..i- n
1
`
L- L
; '
j .•- -i • t r?Ft, 4;. I1.. ,-t

.4.,.7 -3 .Il.ij 1 } : _ i' , 1• -.•-,_I-F,+
?•,
T
i
i
, +:? 1

T'
+- i.4 _ ?: y 'y , ! } {{

rY _ ?. r _I - J f I 1 r
1
i
t
..
-
+ •
j'- r t}
j
... -. ,.... .._ ... _: .. _ ._...
•
-
?
I'
- ___ .
- ,.
.
_•.r
r $ .._,
. _.
,..., , ,T.4..
t ' i i .
,
'-'-
_
- ,
.
.
.
_ C
\ I M 1 1 1 1 1 1
- r r _+r. r. ?. C)
t.
c ?
? _ .
_ ,-{.
. _ .
t
I PI'S
_}
'L?
1 J? L
'
i
1 ?
;
-
?
? -t--. -?-r
'-
'+ I?r'?rli 7 : i ,µ
L? }.
L!_'. _} _ ...1
: ! +
i
?'? - -
_
F
-
-•
: r-
.
r
I

.
L', _
4W '-
-
`u
I O
a
?-
} _t
-
-
_
-
_ =,-r!
_
?-4
t.;..?_ i
-I.:_:i I r'! -,--: I -• t' r t !
1" 1, -
.y _
-
Y
_
, i
; ?'.1 i 1 I ? , -, r , ?
?,
1

T
L
..,.. , . I .t..:. {

:•.-.-"_

_

.t. ..t

- Irr

't"`,_[ K n K n 'C n
lT
NN NN N
J N
L

lt?

..
?

1

1..'.L_ ..i1' I i -1

`
'
_rT:1
_ 4
1.+.ri:
j r ?;_L
._
!
' , _r
?
e.C. , :1 r r+•,

2
-r , . ,•+
?'
.?' .1-. „'{
'i'' ! 14'' I ? ; I '" _!-:
-t ?
i
rl L
'I' '4 -I f ,1?;k? 'YY.. }"'.° yy I
.1 •
l-; . J t , t
. (',. t '}' . j ".I
1. . t t
-

,. ... , .. :.. .., _:.. .

1 _.l..i. ,

r,. r. .t, ;hil

.1._!?, t). J.

I I
,
.
.: _... ?
I
. _ r
.,.?.4. ?'.:_.. -H1-_ .j
` t I t

fill
_. _ r._.-

. :.:... ... ......__ J w-??.
;.' ., : • , ,... r ., . :..;.
, _- ...: i
.. _ .,. :.I. ,,.. ._ ., _. ;.,
._,... :.: >.:.'}.. :.... ,- , -...rt

w,-•.}J
....,-;. „

.., ,.,
:... _.-..

?

'! :'..
-Yr°--}--'.! .r

1',' ?+
; 1 4 i •+ i-t"

t
, °r.:..u 1.?.,-.• -t'r't`? ? ?.1•.

?_+..LI. r.: ?L 1_- i .i
i.J.J.17' {., - -+. ,
r
41 1
.r+

?j. ?
J T. t' t `.,'tr
_
? .1 ,. ..1 .y : I'. r_?,... .T.
jTr t "'_ "fT_7j .'p.F-i_ a_i (-N-'•r
}.j_=a' 't l" ?ti-?`I ?' ( I!?-r
!'>'rl
'7.. ?1: -1 '4?v`ti,? !L. ay_.• ...I.'i_

'- r ,?,,? .J ...;. 1 L'
? , ?

r, _
-s^ FI

.t
..
r•'._rf++-.-1 T Y_
f
1 ?'h„M_:....._r {-i. i ?'...i..: y t i
_I , J ?r-k*-i-:7-t -
tt, ! al I_I,!

.. p.. ..}. _`t.. .II _ r
-,: Y-' ?-t T r ? T-I" 11

;,.....
:,-•. L.:._,:1 .,.I..,.,..-,..,-, L.r-
I :., ,
_._..4_L_JJ
{,...„
t
'°---1.??
...;. ,.}..
, , -. !.
.Tt
,.L
'
i
t..•-??
.r.
1
-- 1. }-
«L.
l.r.l. ..?-,.r-i ?,.' ,'_,.,. _ _,.-_ r+•-r
i ; • .-...:..t } r.. ;_!
''?
7
.,._,_ if :-i
- _
r?."_:rt+ 'i-4.,,y..-I _..r _.r,.- ,-t-.- .r
L.
r. t t l ' 1'. t'1"?_! _
f «.'.
?
-
i is
,
.rY _t:
e:
-
r y I tlt t 'i tl { -
:
_
l
i
i
1
•
SOON I I :. , ,
- -
',' ,
:
t' :
! ,
u.
: t..
J l7
+..
i C . ,"• }:"?; 7.i1
1
7 _.
,
.._
H h r'V "i1 rt'j' )" r.. tt 1_' r :
.
.
y_ ..,_.,.{.
.
.
..
.-
_
t k 7

i
. . _.. _..:_- «...
..?.r•T-e-L -
>._
:..,. , f.;.:
-1:}_.:: L.

_, : IJ ..; I
?. i.r,.

..r.,..
-!? I

i- ,.-• 1.4.

r ..
1.l.l. - i h s 1._r _F _
_' _.1,:.a.,_ _>_ :J-. +.
j
?

+
i?
?i .:.:.i... _....._ ,-?: -r»..._ "..,-; •r? _.:? .a.}.i_-{?..«?•..r k_(.,.t I .. •'r?_!
.'•_ F!'t-r..
_?i.,'ri 5"L ^i: _r,, , "'6'__ ':#.i- p -
.r
. .?..tm-i-t ?"?,. -r •,--}_. J-,?•????? ..L-..{ TTP -„"t" ..I. ! a ! _t. _.,r.

1 ,
-F. 1. L•
AI ?1
1'P:, i
?I'?t_.l.J. ?}1.,. _:f? - ;.1>, +. y.}?..
?
._ (-t. +..L .l. >.!-i_' _ _ r
t
!
'?I
11i.
?t
+: ,c :.
t ,
,3
43? S y, . y -. r1 ,-
k :.,

1`•tr .. j -1 I
-
I.S. _
`?.
- -

r.
? I :._
r.?,

.•h}-•'+..

L
It
1
_.

•!
r
. -.+ i
a...

i
't
, ... _ t I ! i .:.:-.:; ??F'-F;-}-r•?i
Y ' '' _ iJ-{il: l-?F a I,
., t:.:. }'.I '-; f (? - i t
^,?,1-+-•- f-? ?i"-?
1., - tL .?'':;: k_I J-!.

.
.. r 1 'rr .,T'. .?_.,.T'• t rt., ?.' t
1
? -
.•,.I ? t l I -} ;,
!. r'f._ ,. }. •., i-I..
I I•-., -:-111 t ! '!??'
t3' t-!'i i '',` 1
{i-ItTa. L -1-r ! ,, J
?4i H T ..F-
I
r
?

1
:
1
,l -i
L 't
f I ,-1 zC" .A
1 ,?.
l
y
._
"'
.i. --.
?_ r+? 1 1t _ L
_ ji-
..I r,+?t {_?
t t }
' ?
i J 1 T+:?FfI tY
!?+t_.F:, r{ "'- -
tj f-"'. r
1''?r 1 1S i t'} tS tl-
? ?
4
? t . * , 1T 4
J 1? i da ^7-4
Z
r I'..
O
I

'.,. L', i
r_. I
!? t
i
l-
:. J-

'a
-,' :
I
! J Z rJ. .J Lp t ,1:
{ 1 i t .,
JI'J t1 y ,Q-
{'
1 T+ ! , 1 ,' JL14.
I,C ?_kr? { f
!?
TOT .+„?llllz-,, ?1 X14 ,?
f {-1
ir
L?
+.. 1-

.+,.?{
J.
!
1} -
u:i f j-„•
I Ii, 1
I L_ iJ } ?"
+f1 ??nC
ii;
l 11
'S)
i? j
lr '

_ . 1

i ' ,

?':, l
,.
-Y

-1 .,
. _'!' -
fr
.A._r.i 'r ,.r_. a , L.r, t- -
' .
h+`
t 1 L{ ' -
I•: 't 1 i-,
• t ?,?j
`l? '.:.;..;: .Ti.? ....!I
.
,.
,.:?
?
?
,
r.:l< 1 4 ( 1 r•'
'°t o
y9
_..,__ _ _.!..__. z
1 t
Z
X

l i

I

!
I I
I I ?

I! ?

i IJ3
I
?
( 1
Z
0
V +
m
N O
o 0
3
p}
MMI . Cf1 1 f?0 C?o 0? + O W+ }pO tip Oth+ trL y D?
0 0 Z m o O o O O•°O O r Z
0 0 0 0 0 o g W °o °o o° c4i o °o °o 3
0 0 0 0 0 0
? z m
i
m m 0
0
r
c
3
C Z
c rtn 0
a M c
? v
m
W ca K) (A
N A 4. A O co 0) 0) W f0 A W A A N O w
0
x
m "-"
3 r
n 0
fJ? M
W A -0, N p V V m O m A O N O c
O
m
X
0
c
i
Vt
to Z ?
rn
xx
. V
??<a
ao?d
-? m
o m to
y' OO C
C C N
N 10 N
N 0
dog mm
m m C TI ?
° a co m 3 ?.+ m?m
U/ d C .Z1 ? N G Z
~ 3?Dam
gg 3 m
o o,n?i k
n ? co
a o a fO a 0 y
3 CT ?< ?
a ? a CD
3 o
n
'. ;;, P.:;l
- .j 1
?- : 1,?? _. 11
j174
LJ i 1 !
;4
.
i.4 .
, _-T 4
iji

_U
4

L.H_ 4 :4.

A_
4
4

t
J.-
4 4.4-

JW J-:

p
A- tit it 4 1-j.

.4 _?i

T 4.
4
-4

ij
lk,

Ell 41 ?A-! 1
!'T
T

41-

-TT a:
12 _!,J.

U

T
44 4 -

_T.

N.. 4

4

4-4,
L?4_ H

4
F 'DI -4.
.4 . . . . . . ..
+ 1

t !y. !1
71 V' T I p.,
4

4-H
p

:T?

IJ

L.,-. i_;.? i7j,

t;

1,1714JI-1-1

1- - .

4

+ ti
+ _T

j

t 4-
Li H.. 'IT _t
+
'4
?V,

14,

H ?-
T-1
I
'fa
-j,

?-

1

-4,
. I
J?i 4?

-
q
4'

,

tilti
H

+ t
jt!

lut

JILI.-2 Z

T1.

11

..... 4

X -74'.
. t .
r
!-!,:Q
?t.
. .......

l
?i i 'I -
?

4
i

.

111
L
_0, 11, i. " . : . X.

4.1

a j
,
-!_ - -
Ti. .
:: - T
4 . - -
7 .
-1-
L.L
11-
. T
-

:

+

-4 4_4_1

."W

_

T ?":-l .. ..... i -Q., 14

4
4-L
:L 9.4.?

t
yl.i
JA
Ii- . .
_! L, LT-1.1 .

11

P

_C ZT!
Ir.] L

.......... 'j .7-
I. ij ..4- 4.

IT- :--r

_ J.
:
4

--- . .
A

. . . .
- + A.

+

p

p
T.. -
4-

41
j v
lti- -

13 4
4 1 4.

r
11--l.? j

- rM

T

T
M i 7T
T
P
:A-4
2 .1. V
4
,
ii_? 14 i44
4:4-
t4
M4

-'N?4 --j: -P444 .. I-,+f 4- - H 4

t-4-

IT-

n
4:

H

flwiff.
4?

4T

' 4 i- p

I
+
4

4

+
-
17t
Al A

4
WAYNE / DUPLIN COUNTIES
BRIDGE NO. 24 ON NC 403
OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. BRSTP-403(3)
STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1331801
TIP NO. B-4320
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
=361,114 13
f E?04
DATE Gregory J Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
DATE Nicholas L. Graf, P.E., Division Administrator
U Federal Highway Administration
WAYNE / DUPLIN COUNTIES
BRIDGE NO. 24 ON NC 403
OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. BRSTP-403(3)
STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1331801
TIP NO. B-4320
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
DECEMBER 2002
Document Prepared by Ramey Kemp & Associates,
4928-A Windy Hill Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Inc.
17-/1-3/0
Date
Montell W. Irvin, P.E., PTOE, Pr
Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc.
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Theresa Ellerby, Project Deve opment Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
PROJECT COMMITMENTS
WAYNE / DUPLIN COUNTIES
BRIDGE NO. 24 ON NC 403
OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. BRSTP-403(3)
STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1331801
TIP NO. B-4320
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit #23 Conditions, the General Nationwide Permit Conditions,
Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for
Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, NCDOTs Guidelines for Best Management
Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of
Certification, the following special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
NCDOT Division 4
1.) The NCDOT will observe a moratorium on in-water work between February 15 through June 15 to protect
fish spawning. The NCDOT will follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage".
Categorical Exclusion
December 2002
WAYNE / DUPLIN COUNTIES
BRIDGE NO. 24 ON NC 403
OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. BRSTP-403(3)
STATE PROJECT NO. 8.1331801
TIP NO. B-4320
INTRODUCTION
Bridge No. 24, located on NC 403 over the Northeast Cape Fear River, in Wayne and Duplin Counties, is
listed in the Draft 2004-2010 North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) 'Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) as 8-4320 and in the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program as BRSTP-
403(3). The location is shown in Figures 1 and 8.
No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is classified as a Federal "Categorical
Exclusion".
1. PURPOSE AND NEED
The NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate Bridge No. 24 has a sufficiency rating of 32.7 out of a
possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally obsolete and structurally deficient.
The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer and more efficient traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Bridge No. 24 is located on NC 403 approximately 0.6 miles (0.97 km) south of NC 55. The Wayne/Duplin
County line follows the Northeast Cape Fear River in this area and is located on Bridge No. 24. Refer to
Figure 1 and 8 for the project location and Figures 2 and 3 for photos of the existing project area.
Bridge No. 24 was constructed in 1952. The bridge is currently posted to restrict weight limits at 19 tons (17.2
metric tons) for single vehicles and 28 tons (25.5 metric tons) for truck-tractor semi-trailers. The overall length
of the four-span bridge is 70.0 ft (21.3 m). It has a clear roadway width of 24.0 ft (7.3 m) that includes two
travel lanes over the bridge. The deck width out-to-out is 25.4 ft (7.7 m). The superstructure of Bridge No. 24
is a reinforced concrete deck on timber joists. The substructure of the bridge consists of timber caps on
timber piles. Four of the piles on all of the bents have concrete jackets. The.roadway (bridge deck) is
approximately 17 ft (5.2 m) above the creek bed.
NC 403 is classified as a Rural Major Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System. The 2002
average daily traffic (ADT) volume on NC 403 is estimated to be 1,650 vehicles per day (vpd). The
percentages of truck traffic are 2 percent TTST vehicles and 2 percent dual-tired vehicles. The projected
2025 ADT volume is expected to be 2,800 vpd.
The two-lane facility measures approximately 18 ft (5.4 m) in clear roadway width and has a 7 ft (2.1 m)
grassed shoulder on the east side and a 9 ft (2.7 m) grassed shoulder on the west side of the roadway. The
2
vertical alignment is generally flat within the project area and the horizontal alignment is generally straight
except for a curve that begins approximately 40 ft (12.2 m) off the south end of the bridge. The speed limit in
the immediate vicinity of the bridge is posted at 55 miles per hour (mph) (88 km/h). Existing right-of-way is
approximately 60 ft (18.3 m) in width.
There are overhead power lines located along the west side of NC 403. There is a fire hydrant on the east
side of NC 403 approximately 1200 ft (366 m) north of Bridge No. 24. However, there is no evidence that the
water line continues south into the project area. There are no other apparent utilities. Utility impacts are
expected to be minimal.
This section of NC 403 is not part of a designated bicycle route nor is it listed in the Transportation
Improvement Program as needing incidental bicycle accommodations. There is no indication that an unusual
number of bicyclists use this roadway.
Land use within the project area is primarily swampy wooded areas. There is a fairly large residence on the
east side of NC 403 approximately 1500 ft (457 m) north of Bridge No. 24. No other structures are in the
vicinity of the project.
The Department of Public Instruction was contacted by letter on June 21, 2001. No buses for either Wayne or
Duplin Counties cross Bridge No. 24.
There were two crashes reported on NC 403 in the vicinity of Bridge No. 24 during the period from August 1,
1999 to July 31, 2002. Both accidents involved vehicles running off the road. There were no fatalities or
injuries reported.
III. ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
Based upon the preliminary hydraulics report, the proposed replacement structure for Bridge No. 24 will
provide a 105 ft (32.0 m) spill-through bridge with a 40 ft (12.2 m) clear roadway width. The structure will
provide two 12-ft (3.6 m) travel lanes with 8 ft (2.4 m) of lateral clearance on each side of the bridge.
The length and opening size of the proposed structure may increase or decrease as necessary to
accommodate peak flows, as determined by a more detailed hydraulic analysis to be performed during the
final design phase of the bridge.
The roadway approaches will provide two 12 ft (3.6 m) travel lanes with 8 ft (2.4 m) grass shoulders. The
proposed grade will be approximately the same as the existing grade. The design speed is 60 mph (100
km/h).
B. Build Alternatives
Three alternatives for replacing Bridge No. 24 are described below:
3
Alternative A (Preferred)
This alternative consists of replacing the bridge in-place with a new bridge. During construction, traffic will be
maintained by an off-site detour. Traffic will be detoured via SR 1937/1558 (Graham Road), SR 1559 (Jones
Turner Road), NC 55, and NC 403. The off-site detour is to be resurfaced prior to its use. There is a non-
posted culvert on SR 1558 and a new bridge on NC 55. The detour is estimated to be 7.2 miles (11.5 km)
long (Refer to Figure 4).
The total length of roadway approach work for this alternative is approximately 450 ft (137 m). Refer to Figure
5 for'illustration of the altemative.
Alternative B
This altemative consists of replacing the bridge in-place with a new bridge. During construction, traffic will be
maintained by an on-site detour east of NC 403. The total length of permanent roadway approach work for
this alternative is approximately 450 ft (137 m). Refer to Figures 6A and 6B for illustration of this alternative.
The on-site detour will be located approximately 151 (4.6 m) from the south side of the proposed bridge. The
temporary structure will be approximately 72 ft (21.9 m) in length and will have a clear roadway width of 28 ft
(8.6 m) including two 11 ft (3.1 m) travel lanes and 3 ft (1.0 m) of lateral clearance on each side of the bridge.
The detour roadway approaches will provide two 11 ft (3.3 m) travel lanes and 6 ft (1.8 m) wide shoulders on
each side. The length of the temporary detour will be approximately 1628 ft (496 m).
Alternative B was not selected as the preferred because of the higher cost associated with the temporary
detour and greater wetland impacts.
Alternative C
This alternative consists of replacing the bridge with a new bridge on new alignment east of NC 403. During
construction, the existing bridge will be used to maintain traffic. The total length of roadway approach work for
this altemative is approximately 2433 ft (742 m). Refer to Figures 7A and 7B for illustration of this alternative.
Alternative C was not selected as the preferred because of the higher cost and greater wetland impacts.
C. Alternatives Eliminated From Further Consideration
The "Do-Nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge due to its poor condition. This is
not desirable due to the traffic service provided by NC 403:
Investigation of the existing structure by the NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Unit indicates that rehabilitation of
the bridge is not feasible due to its deteriorated condition. Bridge No.. 24 has decayed caps, piles, and
bulkheads. The 'Rehabilitation" alternative was eliminated from further consideration.
4
D. Preferred Alternative (Alternative A)
Alternative A consists of replacing the bridge in-place using an off-site detour to maintain traffic during
construction. This alternative was selected as the preferred alternative because it has fewer impacts to
wetlands and significantly lower total cost.
The Division Engineer concurs with Alternative A as the preferred alternative.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs for each alternative, based on current dollars, are shown below:
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
Alternative A
Preferred Alternative B Alternative C
Structure Removal (Existing) $14,400 $14,400 $14,400
Structure Proposed $273,000 $273,000 $294,000
Off-Site Detour Resurfacing $175,000 $0 $0
Roadway Approaches $87,718 $87,718 $701,152
Detour Structure & Approaches $0 $566,436 $0
Miscellaneous and Mobilization $168,882 $423,446 $454,448
Engineering and Contingencies $81,000 $210,000 $236,000
Right-of-Way/Easement and Utilities $28,200 $41,200 $72,000
Total Project Cost $828,200 $1,616,200 $1,772,000
The estimated cost of the project, as shown in the Draft 2004-2010 NCDOT Transportation Improvement
Program is $750,000, including $200,000 spent in prior years, $50,000 for right-of-way and $500,000 for
construction.
V. NATURAL RESOURCES
Natural resources within the project study area were evaluated to provide: 1) an assessment of existing
vegetation, wildlife, protected species, streams, wetlands, and water quality; 2) an evaluation of probable
impacts resulting from construction; and 3) a preliminary determination of permit needs.
A. Methodology
Materials and research data in support of this investigation have been derived from a number of sources. The
Williams, NC, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (USGS
1980) was consulted to determine the physiographic relief and to assess landscape characteristics. Additional
resources utilized include U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory mapping, the
Soil Survey of Duplin County, North Carolina (USDA 1959), and the Soil Survey of Wayne County, North
Carolina (USDA 1974).
5
Recent aerial photography (scale 1:2400) was reviewed prior to starting the field investigation. Plant
community patterns were identified from available mapping sources and then field verified in May 2001. Plant
community descriptions are based on a classification system utilized by the NC Natural Heritage Program
(NHP) (Schafale and Weakley 1990). When appropriate, community classifications were modified to better
reflect field observations. Vascular plant names typically follow nomenclature found in Radford et al. (1968).
Jurisdictional wetland areas were identified using the three parameter approach (hydrophytic vegetation,
hydric soils, wetland hydrology) following U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) delineation guidelines (DOA
1987). Jurisdictional areas were characterized according to a classification scheme established by Cowardin
et al. (1979). Jurisdictional stream channels were identified using criteria outlined by the COE and the NC
Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
Water resource information for the Northeast Cape Fear River was derived from the most recent versions of
the Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan (DWQ 2000), Basinwide Assessment Report-Cape Fear
River Basin (DWQ 1999) and several DWQ internet resources. Quantitative sampling was not undertaken to
support existing data.
The most current USFWS list of federal protected species with ranges extending into Duplin and Wayne
Counties was reviewed prior to initiation of the May 2001 field investigation. Currently, the most recent
USFWS list is dated May 31, 2002. No additional species have been listed for either Duplin or Wayne
Counties. In addition, NHP records documenting the presence of federal or state listed species within the
project study area were consulted before commencing the field investigation and an updated records search
was performed on December 20, 2001, April 12, 2002 and December 10. 2002.
Direct observations of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife were documented. Expected population distributions
were determined through observations of available habitat and review of supportive documentation found in
Martof et al. (1980), Webster et al. (1985), Menhinick (1991), Hamel (1992), Rohde et al. (1994), Potter et al.
(1980), and Palmer and Braswell (1995).
Quantative calculations were based on the worst case scenario using the 100-foot (30-meter) right of way
limits (minus the existing right of way), the width and length of the replacement structure, the width of the
stream for aquatic impacts, and the length of the project approaches. The actual construction impacts should
be less, but without specific replacement structure design information, the worst case was assumed for the
impact calculations.
B. Physiography and Soils
The project study area is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of North Carolina. The
topography in the project study area is generally characterized as nearly level to gently sloping. Elevations in
the project study area range from 33 to 40 feet (10 to 12 m) above mean sea level (MSL) (USGS 1980). The
project study area consists of forested land, agricultural land, and maintained/disturbed areas. The project
vicinity contains undisturbed forest, successional land, agricultural land, residential homes, and other
maintained/disturbed areas.
The project study area crosses seven soil mapping units (USDA 1959, 1974). The hydric soils located within
the project study area consist of the Bibb (Typic Fluvaquents), Johnston (Cumulic Humaquepts), Weston
6
(Typic Ochracuults), Pamlico (Terric Medisaprists), and Lumbee (Typic Ochraquults) series. The Bibb and
Johnston series are grouped together and represent one soil mapping unit. Non-hydric soils within the project
study area that may contain hydric soil inclusions include the Johns (Aquic Hapludults), Autryville (Arenic
Paleudults), and Manryn (Typic Hapludults) series. Non-hydric soils include the Wagram (Arenic Papudults)
series.
C. Water Resources
C.I. Waters Impacted
The project study area is located within sub-basin 03-06-21 of the Cape Fear River Basin (DWQ 1999, DWQ
2000) and is part of USGS hydrologic unit 03030007 (USGS 1974). The Northeast Cape-Fear River originates
south of SR 1004 near the Town of Mount Olive in southern Wayne County. The Northeast Cape Fear River
has been assigned Stream Index Number (SIN) 18-74-(1) by DWQ from its source to Muddy Creek (DENR
2002a).
C.2. Water Resource Characteristics
The portion of the Northeast Cape Fear River within the project study area is a perennial stream with slow flow
over substrate consisting of organic material and silt. Water clarity at the time of the site inspection was
moderate with heavy tannic acid content. The channel is approximately 50 ft (15 m) wide and greater than 12
ft (3.6 m) deep. A geomorphic characterization of the stream section within the project study area indicates
that the subject reach of the Northeast Cape Fear River is a "DA" type stream channel (Rosgen 1996). This
stream type has multiple channels and occurs in an area with very little relief and has extensive well-vegetated
floodplains and associated wetlands. It is characterized by low gradient and having highly variable width/depth
ratios and sinuosity (Rosgen 1996). The main channel of the Northeast Cape Fear River located within the
project study area was surrounded by flooded wetlands at the time of the field investigation.
This portion of the Northeast Cape Fear River has been assigned a Best Usage Classification of C Sw (DEM
1993, DENR 2002a). The C designation indicates fresh waters that support aquatic life propagation and
survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Secondary recreation is any activity involving
human body contact with water on an infrequent or incidental basis. Point source discharges of treated
wastewater are permitted in these waters, pursuant to Rules.0104 and .0211 of 15A NCAC 213; however, local
programs to control non-point source and stormwater discharge of pollution are required. The Sw designation
refers to Swamp Waters, which have low velocities and other natural characteristics that are different from
adjacent streams.
No Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), High Quality Waters (HQW), WS-Igor WS-II Waters occur within 3.0
miles (4.8 km) upstream or downstream of the project study area (DEM 1993, DENR 2002a). The Northeast
Cape Fear River is not designated as a North Carolina Natural and Scenic River, or as a National Wild and
Scenic River.
One method used by DWQ to monitor water quality is through long-term monitoring of macroinvertebrates.
The Northeast Cape Fear River within the project study area was sampled for benthic macroinvertebrates in
1993 and received a bio-classification of Good-Fair (DWQ 2000).-
7
Another measure of water quality being used by the DWQ is the North Carolina Index of Biotic Integrity
(NCIBI), which assesses biological integrity using the structure and health of the fish community. No NCIBI
samples have been collected within 5.0-miles (8.0 km) of the project study area (DWQ 2000).
C.3. Permitted Dischargers
Discharges that enter surface waters through a pipe, ditch or other well-defined point of discharge are broadly
referred to as "point sources." Wastewater point source discharges include municipal (city and county) and
industrial wastewater treatment plants and small domestic wastewater treatment systems serving schools,
commercial offices, residential subdivisions, and individual homes (DWQ 1999). Stormwater point source
discharges include stormwater collection systems for municipalities and stormwater discharges associated
with certain industrial activities. Point source dischargers in North Carolina must apply for and obtain a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Discharge permits are issued under the
NPDES program, delegated to DWQ by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). There are four
permitted point source dischargers located within 5.0 miles (8.0 km) upstream of the project study area (DENR
2002b). The closest major discharger downstream of the project study area is located over 12 miles (19.3 km)
south of Goshen Swamp.
CA. Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Short-term impacts to water quality, such as sedimentation and turbidity, may result from construction-related
activities. Temporary construction impacts due to erosion and sedimentation will be minimized through
implementation of a stringent erosion control schedule and the use of BMP's. The contractor will follow
contract specifications pertaining to erosion control measures as outlined in 23 CFR 650 Subpart B and Article
107-13 entitled Control of Erosion, Siltation, and Pollution pursuant to NCDOT's Standard Specfcations for
Roads and Structures. These measures include: the use of dikes, berms, silt basins, and other containment
measures to control runoff and elimination of construction staging areas in floodplains and adjacent
waterways. Disturbed sites will be revegetated with herbaceous cover after any temporary construction
impacts
Other impacts to water quality, such as changes in water temperature as a result of increased exposure to
sunlight due to the removal of stream-side vegetation or increased shade due to the construction of the
bridges, and changes in stormwater flows due to changes in the amount of impervious surface adjacent to the
stream channels, can be anticipated as a result of this project. However, due to the limited amount of overall
change in the surrounding areas, impacts are expected to be temporary in nature.
No adverse long-term impacts to water resources are expected to result from the alternatives being
considered. The proposed bridge replacement project will allow for continuation of present stream flow within
the existing channel, thereby protecting stream integrity.
C.S. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
Section 402-2 of NCDOT's Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures is labeled Removal of Existing
Structure. This section outlines restrictions and Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal (BMP-BDRs), as well as guidelines for calculating maximum potential fill in the creek resulting from
demolition. These standards will be followed during the replacement of Bridge No. 24.
8
The superstructure of Bridge No. 24 consists of a reinforced concrete deck on timber joists. The substructure
of the bridge consists of end bents and three interior bents all consisting of timber caps on timber piles. Four
of the piles on all the bents have concrete jackets. The bridge has four spans and totals 70 feet (21 m) in
length.
There is the potential for the concrete deck and the concrete jackets to be dropped into Waters of the United
States during demolition and removal. The maximum (worst case) resulting temporary fill associated with the
removal of Bridge No. 24 is approximately 40.4 cubic yards (30.9 cubic m).
According to comments received from the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), bridge
demolition and removal activities are prohibited during the fish spawning season of February 15 to June 15.
Because a moratorium applies, this project falls under Case 2 (allowing no in-water work during moratorium
periods) of the Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal.
D. Biotic Resources
D.I. Plant Communities
Distribution and composition of plant communities throughout the project study area reflect landscape4evel
variations in topography, soils, hydrology, and past and present land use practices. When appropriate, the
plant community names have been adopted and modified from the NHP classification system (Schafale and
Weakley 1990) and the descriptions written to reflect local variations within the project study area. Four plant
communities were identified within the project study area: Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forest, mixed
hardwood forest, agricultural land, and maintained/disturbed areas. These communities total approximately
32.0 acres (13.0 ha), which does not include the existing impervious surface (1.1 acres [0.4 ha]) associated
with the roadway. Open water area is not separated from the Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forest
acreage due to the lack of a well-defined main channel.
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest - Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forest covers
approximately 14.2 acres (5.7 ha) (44%) of the project study area. This community type comprises the
floodplain of the Northeast Cape Fear River. Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forests are located on
abandoned or relict natural levee deposits, point bar ridges, and other relatively high parts of the floodplain,
away from the channel. Dominant canopy species include red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), and river birch (Betula nigra). The herbaceous layer is thick and diverse and consisted of such
species as soft rush (Juncus effusus), sedges (Carex spp.), spike rush (Eleochads spp.), and lizards tail
(Saururus cemuus).
Mixed Hardwood Forest - Mixed hardwood forest covers approximately 6.6 acres (2.7 ha) (21%) of the
project study area. This community type is found on mid slopes, low ridges, upland flats, and other dry-mesic
upland areas. Dominant tree species include water oak (Quercus nigra), tulip poplar (Lkiodendron tulipifera),
red maple, sweetgum, and black cherry (Prunus serotina). Groundcover is relatively sparse with dominant
species comprised of ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica).
Agricultural Land - Agricultural land covers approximately 9.1 acres (3.7 ha) (28%) of the project study area.
Agricultural land includes areas that are currently or have been recently in production of crops. These are not
9
natural plant communities and are selectively planted or maintained for specific domesticated plants.
Soybeans, corn, tobacco, and cotton are the primary crops observed in the project vicinity.
Maintained/Disturbed Areas -Maintained/disturbed areas cover approximately 2.1 acres (0.9 ha) (7%) of the
project study area. Maintained/disturbed areas located within the project study area include maintained rights-
of-way, residential areas, and driveways. The impervious road surface is not included in this community type.
Vegetation associated with the maintained/disturbed land includes grasses such as fescue (Festuca sp.), and
unidentified species of Panicum sp. and Paspalum sp.
D.2. Wildlife
The project study area was visually surveyed for signs of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife; however, little
evidence of wildlife was observed during the field effort. Floodplain forests and upland forests along the
Northeast Cape Fear River may provide cover and food and allow animals to travel between different habitats.
Only one terrestrial reptile was observed within the project study area. A copperhead (Agkistrodon contortix)
was seen in an area of mixed hardwood forest. Other species expected to occur within the project study area
include eastern box turtle (Terrapene carolina), eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis), worm snake
(Carphophis amoenus), black racer (Coluber constrictor), green anole (Anolis carolinensis), and ground skink
(Scincella lateralis).
No terrestrial amphibians were observed within the project study area. Species expected to occur within the
project study area include Fowler's toad (Bufo woodhouset), green treefrog (Hyla cinerea), and Brimley's
chorus frog (Pseudacris brimley).
Bird species observed within or adjacent to the project study area include such species as mourning dove
(Zenaida macroura), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), bam swallow (Hirundo rustica), tufted
titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor, Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis), Carolina wren (Thryothorus
ludovicianus), blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), common yellowthroat (Geothlypis hichas), eastern
towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), and red-winged blackbird (Agelaius
phoeniceus).
No mammals were observed or evidenced within the project study area. Species expected to be found in and
around the project study area include raccoon (Procyon lotor), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), red fox
(Vulpes vulpes), gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), and eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floddanus). Other
species that may use the Northeast Cape Fear River floodplain as a travel corridor are white-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus) and bobcat (Felis rufus).
D.3. Aquatic Communities
Limited kick-netting, seining, dip-netting, and visual observation of stream banks and channel within the
project study area were conducted in the Northeast Cape Fear River. The water depth greatly limited the
amount of benthic samples collected. Samples were collected from the edge of the deep channel along mud
banks and sandbars. Benthic macroinvertebrate samples were collected pursuant to current DWQ Aquatic
Insect Collection Protocols.
Only one fish species was documented within this reach of the Northeast Cape Fear River; eastern
mudminnow (Umbra pygmaea). Other species expected to occur in the project study area include redfin
10
pickerel (Esox americanus), largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), and
American eel (Anquilla rostrata).
Coastal Plain streams are often utilized by anadromous fish species. Anadromous fish, such as striped bass
(Moron saxatilis), shad (Alosa spp.), and sturgeon (Acipenser spp.) spend their adult lives in the ocean but
return to freshwater habitats to reproduce. Spawning habitats of anadromous species are typically located
upstream of tidal influence and saltwater intrusion. Spawning conditions are specific for each species and
variables include water velocity, water depth, substrate composition, temperature, pH, turbidity, and water
hardness. The Northeast Cape Fear River is known to have seasonal populations of these species; however,
Menhinick (1991) does not document either American shad or striped bass as occurring in the project study
area. In addition, neither Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrhychus) nor shortnose sturgeon (A. brevirostrum)
have been documented from the project study area (Menhinick 1991).
Aquatic invertebrate surveys included dip-net surveys. Other accepted methods were not feasible due to the
depth and flooded condition of. the river at the time of the field effort. One mussel species was found in the
Northeast Cape Fear River, eastern floater (Pyganodon cataracta). Various aquatic macroinvertebrates were
also found during the dip-netting. Numerous taxa of macroinvertebrates were captured while sampling the
Northeast Cape Fear River and were identified based on McCafferty (1998). Benthic macroinvertebrates
collected include midges (Family Chironomidae), leeches (Class Hirundea), beetles (Families Noteridae,
Naucoridae, and Halipidae), mayflies (Families Caenidae, and Siphlonuridae), damsel flies and dragonflies
(Families Lestidae and Macromiidae), and snails (Class Gastropoda).
No aquatic reptiles were observed in the project study area. Species expected to occur within the project
study area include the brown water snake (Nerodia taxispilota), slider (Pseudemys scripta), eastern
cottonmouth (Agkistrodon piscivorus), mud turtle (Kinostemon subrubrum), painted turtle (Chrysemys picta),
and snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina).
No aquatic amphibians were observed within the project study area. Species expected to occur within the
project study area include such species as bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana), green tree frog (Hyla cinera),
Southern leopard frog (Rana utdculada), and pickerel frog (Rana palustris).
DA. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
DA.a. Terrestrial Communities
Potential impacts to plant communities are estimated based on the approximate area of each plant community
present within both the proposed right-of-way and the temporary construction limits of any on-site detour or
easement that falls outside the estimated permanent right-of-way limit. A summary of potential plant
community impacts is presented in Table 2. All plant community impacts are based on aerial photograph base
mapping. A portion of the permanent plant community impact amount will consist of proposed right-of-way for
the road after the bridge replacement is complete. Impervious surface and open water areas are not included
in this analysis.
11
Table 2
Potential Im ;=cts to Plant Communities
POTENTIAL IMPACTS
PLANT acres hectares
COMMUNITY ALT A ALT B ALT C
Preferred
Impacts Impacts Temp. Impacts
Im acts*
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood 0.29 (0.12) 0.29 (0.12) 0.21 (0.09) 1.74 (0.70)
Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.04 (0.02) 0.04 (0.02) 0.27 (0.11) 0.57 (0.23)
Agricultural Land 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.25 (0.10)
Maintained/Disturbed Areas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.21 0.09
Total (acre[ha]) 0.33 (0.14} 3(0.14) 0.48 (0.20) 2.77 (1.12)
TOTAL FOR ALT acre ha 0.33 0.14 0.81 0.34 2.77 (1.12) 1
* Note: Temporary construction impacts are based on the portion of the impacts that fall outside the estimated
right-of-way limit or impacts of temporary on-site detour.
Permanent community impacts for Altemative A represent the least amount of the three altematives when the
potential temporary impacts are included. The highest amount of permanent plant community impacts result
from Alternative C, which calls for bridge replacement on new location. The plant communities with the largest
amount of potential permanent and temporary impacts for all proposed altematives is the Coastal Plain
bottomland hardwood forest and mixed hardwood forest communities.
DA.b. Aquatic Communities
The proposed bridge replacement will not result in substantial loss or displacement of known terrestrial wildlife
populations. Potential down-stream impacts to aquatic habitat will be avoided by bridging the Northeast Cape
Fear River to maintain regular flow and stream integrity. In addition, temporary impacts to downstream habitat
from increased sediment during construction will be reduced by limiting in-stream work to an absolute
minimum, except for the removal of the portion of the sub-structure below the water. BMP's and BMP-BDRs
will be followed to minimize impacts.
E. Special Topics
E.I. Waters of the United States
Wetlands and surface waters fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States" as defined in 33
CFR 328.3 and in accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
Waters of the United States are regulated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The
waters in the Northeast Cape Fear River within the project study area exhibit characteristics of riverine lower
perennial, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded (R2UB3) waters (Cowardin of al. 1979). The main
channel of the Northeast Cape Fear River located within the project study area was surrounded by flooded
wetlands at the time of the field investigation. Therefore, the channel was not delineated and was
approximated on the wetlands maps.
12
Wetlands subject to review under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) are defined by the
presence of three primary criteria: hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and evidence of hydrology within 12
inches (30.5 centimeters[cm]) of the soil surface for a portion (12.5 percent) of the growing season (DOA
1987). Based on this three-parameter approach, jurisdictional wetlands occur within the project study area in
the form of Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forest. The Coastal Plain bottomland hardwood forest exhibits
characteristics of a palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded (PF01C) wetland
(Cowardin et al. 1979).
E.2. Potential Impacts to Waters of the United States
Temporary and permanent impacts to surface waters and wetlands are estimated based on the amount of
each jurisdictional area within the project limits. Temporary impacts include those impacts that will result from
temporary construction activities outside of permanent right-of-way and/or those associated with temporary
on-site detours. Temporary impacts will be restored to their original condition after the project has been
completed. Permanent impacts are those areas that will be in the construction limits and/or the proposed
right-of-way of the new structure and approaches. Potential wetland and surface water impacts are included
in Table 3.
Table 3
Potential Impacts to Jurisdictional Wetlands and Surface Waters
JURISDICTIONAL POTENTIAL IMPACTS
AREAS ALT A
Preferred ALT B ALT C
Impacts Impacts Temp.
Impacts* Impacts
R2UB3
PFO1 C 0.12 (0.05)
0.29 0.12 0.12 (0.05)
0.29 (0.12) 1 0.03 (0.01)
0.69 0.28 0.15 (0.06)
1.74 0.70
Total Areas (acres[ha]) 0.41(0.17) 0.41 (0.17) 0.72 (0.29) 1.89 (0.76)
TOTAL FOR ALT (acres[ha]): 0.41(0.17) 1.13 ( 0.46) 1.89 (0.76)
Perennial Stream Channel Impacts feet (m) 115(35) 115(35) 50(15) 165(50)
TOTAL FOR ALT feet m 115 35 165(50) 165(50)
R2UB3 - riverine, lower perennial, unconsolidated bottom, permanently flooded
PF01 C - palustrine, forested, broad-leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded
*Note: Temporary construction impacts are based on the portion of the impacts not included in the construction limits for the
permanent structure.
Alternative A (Preferred) will potentially impact the least amount of jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters.
Alternative B will have permanent impacts consistent with those of Alternative A; however, Alternative B will
also have temporary jurisdictional impacts, which adds to the overall impact amount. Alternative C is not
anticipated to have any temporary impacts, although permanent jurisdictional impacts may be greater than the
impacts for the other two alternatives.
13
E.3. Permits
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act - In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344), a permit is required from the USACE for projects of this type for the discharge of dredged or fill material
into "Waters of the United States". The USACE issues two types of permits for these activities. A general
permit may be issued on a nationwide or regional basis for a category or categories of activities when: those
activities are substantially similar in nature and cause only a minimal individual or cumulative environmental
impacts, or when the general permit would result in avoiding unnecessary duplication or regulatory control
exercised by another Federal, state, or local agency provided that the environmental consequences of the
action are individually and cumulatively minimal. If a general permit is not appropriate for a particular activity,
then an individual permit must be utilized. Individual permits are authorized on a case-by-case evaluation of a
specific project involving the proposed discharges.
It is anticipated that this project will fall under Nationwide. Permit 23, which is a type of general permit.
Nationwide Permit 23 is relevant to approved Categorical Exclusions. This permit authorizes any activities,
work and discharges undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed, in whole or in part, by
another federal agency and that the activity is "categorically excluded" from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category-of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively have a significant
effect on the environment. Activities authorized under nationwide permits must satisfy all terms and conditions
of the particular permit. However, final permit decisions are left to the discretionary authority of the USACE.
Section 401 Water Quality Certification - A 401 Water Quality Certification, administered through the DWQ,
will also be required. This certification is issued for any activity which may result in a discharge into waters for
which a federal permit is required. According to the DWQ, one condition of the permit is that the appropriate
sediment and erosion control practices must be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity
water quality standard.
EA. Mitigation Evaluation
Avoidance - Each project alternative contains jurisdictional wetlands and surface waters, which may be
subject to impact. Complete avoidance of jurisdictional impacts is not possible due to the scope of the project
and on-site constraints.
Minimization - Of the three alternatives studied, Altemative A will impact the least amount of jurisdictional
area. Efforts to minimize impacts to jurisdictional areas have been made by reducing the side slope of NC
403 from a desired 6:1 slope to a maximum of 2:1. Further measures to minimize impacts to these areas
would require a reduction in the design standards of - NC 403, which is not recommended considering the
volume of traffic, existing alignment of the roadway and the speed of vehicles traveling through the project
area. Best Management Practices will be used in an effort to minimize impacts, including avoiding placing
staging areas within wetlands.
Mitigation - Compensatory mitigation is not proposed for this project due to the limited nature of project
impacts. Temporary impacts associated with the construction activities could be mitigated by replanting
disturbed wetland areas with native species and removal of any temporary fill material within the floodplain
upon project completion. Final compensatory wetland and stream mitigation requirements will be determined
14
by the USACE under the statutory provisions of CWA 5404 and the January 15, 2002 Final Notice of Issuance
of Nationwide Permits.
F. Protected Species
F.I. Federally Protected Species
Species with the federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T), or officially proposed (P) for such
listing, are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). The following federal protected species are listed for Duplin and Wayne County (USFWS list dated May
31, 2002):
Table 4
Federally Protected Species Listed for Wayne and Duplin Counties
Common Name Scientific Name Status County Biological Conclusion
Red-cockaded
woodpecker Picoides borealis E Wayne and Duplin No effect
American alligator Affi ator mississi iensis T S/A Du lin N/A
Endangered - any native or once-native species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
Threatened (S/A) - a species carrying the threatened status due to having a similar appearance to another listed species.
Red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) - This small woodpecker measuring 7 to 8.5 inches (17.8 to 21.6 cm)
long has a black head, prominent white cheek patch, and black-and-white barred back. Males often have red
markings (cockades) behind the eye, but the cockades may be absent or difficult to see (Potter et al. 1980).
Primary nest sites for RCWs include open pine stands greater than 60 years of age with little or no mid-story
development. Foraging habitat is comprised of open pine or pine/mixed hardwood stands 30 years of age or
older (Henry 1989). Primary habitat consists of mature to over-mature southern pine forests dominated by
loblolly (Pinus taeda), long-leaf (P. palustris), slash (P. elliotii), and pond (P. serotina) pines. Nest cavities are
constructed in the heartwood of living pines, generally older than 60 years, that have been infected with red-
heart disease. Nest cavity trees tend to occur in clusters, which are referred to as colonies. The woodpecker
drills holes into the bark around the cavity entrance, resulting in a shiny, resinous buildup around the entrance
that allows for easy detection of active nest trees. Pine flatwoods or pine-dominated savannas, which have
been maintained by frequent natural fires, serve as ideal nesting and foraging sites for this woodpecker.
Development of a thick understory may result in abandonment of cavity trees.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NO EFFECT
No suitable nesting or foraging habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker exists within the project study area.
An updated NHP records search was performed on December 10, 2002. NHP records document one RCW
occurrence within 3.0 miles (4.8 km) of the project study area. This RCW occurrence is located approximately
4.0 miles (6.4 km) southeast of Mt. Olive and is approximately 3.0 miles (4.8 km) from the project study area.
The last recorded observation is from 1979. Project construction should not impact this species due to the
fact that no suitable habitat occurs within the project study area.
15
American alligator - American alligator is listed as Threatened based on the similarity in appearance to other
protected crocodilians; however, there are no other crocodilians within North Carolina. American alligators
can be found in a variety of freshwater to estuarine aquatic habitats including swamp forests, marshes, large
streams and canals, and ponds and lakes (Martof et al. 1980).
Potential habitat for American alligator does exist within the project study area; however, no individuals were
observed. Construction activities may temporarily displace American alligators in the project vicinity; however,
no long-term impact to the American alligator is anticipated as a result of this project.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: NOT APPLICABLE
The American alligator is listed as Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance [T(S/A)]. T(S/A) species are
not subject to Section 7 consultation and a biological conclusion is not required.. Potential habitat does exist
for the American alligator within the project study area. Any impacts to this species should be only temporary
in nature.
F.2. Federal species of concern
The May 31, 2002 FWS list also includes a category of species designated as "Federal species of concern"
(FSC). The FSC designation provides no federal protection under the ESA for the species listed. The
presence of potential suitable habitat (Amoroso 1999, LeGrand et al. 2001) within the project study area has
been evaluated for the following FSC species listed for Duplin and Wayne Counties.
Table 5
Federal Species of Concern Listed for Duplin and Wayne Counties
Common Name Scientific Name County State Status Potential Habitat
Southern ho nose snake Heterodon simus Du lin, Wayne SR N
Croatan crayfish Procambarus lumimanus Du lin W Y
Venus flytrap Dionea musci ula Du lin C-SC N
Savanna cowbane 0 olis temate Du lin W N
Raines ue's big-eared bat Co orhinus rafines uii Wayne SC Y
Pinewoods shiner L hrurus matutinus Wayne SR Y
Atlantic i toe Fusconaia masoni Wayne T Y
Ponds ice Litsea aestivalis Wayne C N
Special Concern (SC) - any species which requires monitoring but which may be collected and sold under specific regulations.
Candidate(C) - a species for which USFWS has enough information on file to support proposals for listing as endangered or
threatened.
Watch List (W) - any species believed to be rare and of conservation concern but not warranting active monitoring.
Significantly Rare (SR) - species which are very rare, generally with 1-20 populations in the state, and generally reduced in
numbers by habitat destruction.
Threatened (T) - likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a portion of its range.
An updated search of the NHP records on December 10, 2002 documented no FSC occurrences within 3.0
miles (4.8 km) of the project study area.
16
F.3. State Protected Species
Plant and animal species which are on the North Carolina state list as Endangered (E), Threatened (T),. or
Special Concern (SC) receive limited protection under the North Carolina Endangered Species Act (G.S. 113-
331 et seq.) and the North Carolina Plant Protection Act of 1979 (G.S. 106-202 et seq.). An updated search
of the NHP records on December 10, 2002 documented no state protected species occurrences within 3.0
miles (4.8 km) of the project study area.
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account the
effect of their undertakings (federally funded, licensed, or permitted) on properties included in or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings, This project has been coordinated with the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) in accordance with the Advisory Council's regulations and
FHWA procedures.
B. Historic Architecture
In their August 6, 2001, letter, the SHPO stated "We have conducted a review of the project area and are
aware of no properties of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance, which would be affected by the
project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as currently proposed." Based on the SHPO's
comments, a survey was not conducted. A copy of the SHPO memorandum is included in the Appendix.
C. Archaeology
In their August 6, 2001, letter, the SHPO stated "We have conducted a review of the project area and are
aware of no properties of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance, which would be affected by the
project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as currently proposed." Based on the SHPO's
comments, a survey was not conducted. A copy of the SHPO memorandum is included in the Appendix.
Vii. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of inadequate bridges will result in
safer traffic operations.
The project is considered a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of substantial
environmental consequences.
Replacement of Bridge No. 24 will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or natural
environment.
17
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No change in land use is
expected to result from the construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition will be limited. No
relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed alternative.
In compliance with Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income Populations) a review was conducted to determine whether minority or low-
income populations were receiving disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental
impacts as a result of this project. The investigation determined the project would not disproportionately
impact any minority or low-income populations.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected to adversely affect
social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
The studied route does not contain any bicycle accommodations, nor is it a designated bicycle route;
therefore, no bicycle accommodations have been included as part of this project.
This project has been coordinated with the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service. The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their
representatives to consider the potential impact to prime farmland for all land acquisition and construction
projects. Alternatives A and B will not impact prime farmland. Alternative C will involve 0.13 acres of prime
and unique farmland and 1.25 acres of farmland having state or local importance in the vicinity of the project.
No publicly owned parks or recreational facilities, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or historic sites of national,
state or local significance in the immediate vicinity of the project will be impacted. The proposed project will
not require right-of-way acquisition or easement from any land protected under Section 4(f) of the Department
of Transportation Act of 1966.
No adverse effects to air quality are anticipated from this project. This project is an air quality "neutral, project,
so it is not required to be included in the regional emissions analysis, and a project level CO analysis is not
required. Since the project is located in an attainment area, 40 CFR Part 51 is not applicable. If vegetation or
wood debris is disposed of by open burning, it shall be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC
2D.0520 and 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act. This evaluation
completes the assessment requirements for air quality, and no additional reports are required.
Ambient noise levels may increase during the construction of this project; however this increase will be only
temporary and usually confined to daylight hours. There should be no notable change in traffic volumes after
this project is complete. Therefore, this project will have no adverse effect on existing noise levels. Noise
receptors in the project area will not be impacted by this project. This evaluation completes the assessment
requirements for highway noise set forth in 23 CFR Part 772. No additional reports are required.
The NCDOT Geotechnical Unit observed no evidence of underground storage tanks or other areas of
contamination at or near the proposed project.
18
It is unlikely that any archaeological resources listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by this project.
No adverse effect on the overall public is expected. There will be some inconvenience to local travel due to
the closure of SR 1235. Wayne / Duplin County Emergency Services Departments indicated that this project
will not significantly impact their response time if Alternative A is chosen as the preferred alternative.
Wayne and Duplin Counties are participants in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. The project is
not located in a Detailed Study Area, but is located within a Zone A floodplain. The approximate 100-year
floodplain in the project area is shown in Figure 9. There are no practical alternatives to crossing the
floodplain area. Any shift in alignment will result in an impact of about the same magnitude. - The proposed
project is not anticipated to increase the level or extent of upstream flood potential. All reasonable measures
will be taken to minimize any possible harm.
Geotechnical borings for the bridge foundation will be necessary.
Based on the above discussion, it is concluded that no substantial adverse environmental impacts will result
from the replacement of Bridge No. 24.
Vlll. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Due to the isolated nature of this bridge replacement project, no formal public involvement program was
initiated. Efforts were undertaken early in the planning process to contact local officials to involve them in the
project development with a scoping letter.
1X. AGENCY COORDINATION
Agency comments are summarized below. Letters from the commenting agencies are included in the
appendix.
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC): Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this
location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This
includes an in-water moratorium from February 15 to June 15.
Response: The NCDOT will observe a moratorium on in-water work between February 15 to June 15
to protect fish spawning and will follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish
Passage".
19
X. REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh. 85 pp.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater
Habitats of the United States. FWS/OBS-79/31. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC. 103 pp.
Department of the Army (DOA). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Tech. Rpt. Y-87-1.
US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 100 pp.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). 2002a. North Carolina Waterbodies Listed by
Subbasin. http:i/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/basinsand waterbodies.
DENR. 2002b. Active NPDES Permit. Web Address: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES/documents/r)ermits.xis
Division of Environmental Management (DEM). 1993. Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned
to the Waters of the Cape Fear River Basin. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources, Raleigh.
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). 1999. Basinwide Assessment Report-Cape Fear River Basin. NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 420 pp.
DWQ. 2000. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Raleigh, NC. 274 pp.
Hamel, P.B. 1992. Land Manager's Guide to the Birds of the South. The Nature Conservancy, Southeastern
Region, Chapel Hill, NC. 437 pp.
Henry, V.G. 1989. Guidelines for Preparation of Biological Assessments and Evaluations for the Red-
cockaded Woodpecker. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Atlanta,
GA. 13 pp.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr., S.P. Hall, and J.T. Finnegan. 2001. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh. 91 pp.
Martof, B.S., W.M. Palmer, J.R. Bailey, and J.R. Harrison III. 1980. Amphibians and Reptiles of the Carolinas
and Virginia. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 264 pp.
McCafferty, W. P. 1998. Aquatic Entomology. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA. 448 pp.
20
Menhinick, E.F. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, Raleigh. 227 pp.
Palmer, W.M. and A.L. Braswell. 1995. Reptiles of North Carolina. The University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, NC. 412 pp.
Potter, E.F., J.F. Parnell, and R.P. Teulings. 1980. Birds of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 408 pp.
Radford, A. E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of The Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
Rohde, F.C., R.G Arndt, D.G. Lindquist, and J.F. Parnell. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of the Carolinas, Virginia,
Maryland, and Delaware. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 222 pp.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Geomorphology. Wildland Hydrology, Inc. Pagosa Springs, CO. 365 pp.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C. Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh. 325 pp.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1959. Soil Survey of Duplin County, North Carolina. 74 pp.
USDA. 1974. Soil Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina. 72 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 12 April 2001. Endangered, threatened, and candidate species and
federal species of concern, by county, in North Carolina. 51 pp.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Units Map, State of North Carolina.
USGS. 1980. Williams, NC 7.5-minute series topographic quadrangle map.
Webster, W.D., J.F. Pamell, and W.C. Biggs, Jr. 1985. Mammals of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Maryland.
The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 255 pp.
21
FIGURES
1937 ? r
LaL4 i
56 7
1937
l
a5.9
1558
o .a O
1372
LQD_4
1372
1368
Q
.
0
r
932 66
` 1754
1745 174
B-4320 '
r i
. 15
PROJECT LOCATION
WAYNE
COUNTY
STUDIED DETOUR
North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Division of Highways
Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch
SCALE IN MILES
7 0 1
FIGURE 4
STUDIED OFF-SITE DETOUR
BRIDGE NO. 24
ON NC 403
OVER NE CAPE FEAR RIVER
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TIP PROJECT B-4320
i
LOOKING SOUTH ACROSS BR DGE.NO> 24
Em 3 AYNE : D PLI COU [E FIGURE
REPLACE BRIDGE O.24 O C 403 OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
} LOOKING NORTH ACROSS BRIDGE O. 4
I LOOKING : T ES SIDE OF BRIDGE NO. 24
LOOKHNG A, l EST SIDE F BRIDGE O.2
REPLACE BRIDE r?O. 24 N 40 403 OVER N SEAS i CAPE FEAR RIVER PROJECT PH5OTO . i-IS
Fi-

10 Hopewell
o
Ch.
3 Wayne .

t '
Chp. ?r
1932

` W ILLIAMS
\ PONS 1745
O 0
o-
1 FP?? .• .403
Best
Chp. 1948
H
J
`,
L bol
1915
1745
`+J 4-1
/1952
9
1932 1948

Williams
?•2
1948
Bi432O
"--FAR
PROJECT LOCATION
WAYNE
COUNTY SCALE IN MILES
T 0 1
FIGURE I
Korth Carolina Department of AREA LOCATION MAP
Transportation BRIDGE NO. 24
Division of Highways ON NC 403
Project Development & Environmental
Analysis Branch OVER NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TIP PROJECT B-4320
s
>e s ;
e ?/ / sl
Z IG Ali
\GZ
?I
IN. a m
f ro? a? °
' rn
r) G'i ' -?, •cr `?- ?.., •• a'L q
i ?GOIJniT --
71 AYNE f.OIINTY ` ..
? ?I r O D ? i I m ley ? I ' n O ' ?,•-• ...?.....• ..,.-L.5 .... . . ..w.: -.•.r..? y
? 4 4 4
ILA
f f O
?a? ? 4a ? ? I ?' ??z C
Is. es ??IrOD? i I I ? ? rn
rnc.+°•lq°?o n I
$ w st m
II ? ,
c ? 'I
? I
m ? I
k I w 30 r o N
b
Ito
a
z
w/
T / ? ?? T `n n
15
T
/ / / ' I I I1
?? ? i I rn
lall
m
b`?L+?lc?yc ? m I I ?
v?Qim I 1 1 r? 15
? w n, I ? ? RI
?'NrODrn 1 11 ? ;•'? r' rn
?,a?+;?4 n \ m \ ,t ao ? Z
s, F o
Oil ?y oo = o?
giEq W ~! iy
C rHf O GH?Y
m
as
D
0
8 ~ L
O r $ p
a ?? A z r
Z
Ao?
m
mz
a
ro?
?W m
\G?: ? ? A/ATCH
E ? ? o oG ? UNF ?T? ? ?
G221 ?A ?'W
T
?o Z)
17
y5o -
9R ?wPrn? ?A~f? I S N
R
o I n i 20
? x + ? CA ? fn I
E4q E_
? m •?..,,,,y? ?A"?' -?---?'._DI?LIN COUNTv
WAYNE COUNTY
7 a I d o ...,..25
::n -1 f-zi n I rn ?I n
?wmwwm ? ? ? 4 Q? rn
v T
M
tt y xf w+ ORN- c I ? rnl ? ? n
a
g ?, ? N I j ? ? ? !o
? ? I I N
+ . . + y_ r r
?w?qa° c m II ` 05 rn
w-R ?xO? rn ? I n
mt wit w ? I II
?y4 N
(, °
? 1 rn
y ?
i I
?I 7 3o
ICS--•? ,^1'^ I Imp
14 •,, ..
? //?^wn ?a I I ?.
o I
I
m
p e I
O ?l?Y 1t G ?I I I Cz{ W
lit I
`?
z
rn
m Ii ?
?•. ? N
?1 ? / / I ZI c0
a
i?
t? I ? I
r-
Q
15 O
I
I? -J? a`"`?Sg? rn 11 1 m
20 O
1'11
1n ?.? . n ° ° Vf f? 1 1 1 I ?+
N ?J?A 1 1 I
.? i. ^' Zp IvTI
rt,
.f O
.OG??`/. \ ?? f. r,.: }•?t1 ;nc' ! .F+t. .
\? , ao Ile.
4YtiE ,.CMG
,?G,y\`nee - ,. .?_.
Zti ? sz Z< ?
a N o 8 z O° w
Zr 30
rn
nQits a nrt?a??'???R®
rn
ti r
4
z 7, ? Z yp Q ?
i
in
MATCH UNE -
ALTC- •STA 22?OO,pO
, I I I
I I I S
I ,
I
?w?8g? rn
y?o _ I I 2
N ? II
I
• a ? v, f? I I
o?c.,oo c? ? I
?I = a? I
? ?I ?°??g` ? I I I m ? n
? w ??? ?, I I I I a
`? z I i I 4 30
?" I Q
?,- D
I?? - ?. r
I
rri
D
I ?hA t:,
I ?. 30 ,,..?..
e s c -?-, ^ I I , I oaa?
?? I I I I I Q\?? 7
t ?? I I I I
f m
c ??o
W _
W
cn g \ r ? ? ? a
Q ti ? ? If7l * ? ? Jsp?
?t ? es? K
All
L)i
_ q= m
$ ??$ z
ee ,;
s'
ANN
f

W

F ?
Ri
l'
r
z v
4 p { J°
,. way I
jam, ?L *`5, •,3,? ) ? k h 9 ? 't ?: b„ ?
W

? `xY
i
R
f
yp k
FLOODDIINSURANCE RATE MAP I FLOODDIINSURANCE RATE MAP
DUPLIN COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
(UNINCORPORATED AREAS)
PANEL 25 OF 275
PANEL LOCATION
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
370083 00258
EFFECTIVE DATE:
JULY 4, 1989
WAYNE COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
(UNINCORPORATED AREAS)
PANEL 140 OF 145
(SEE NAP OHM FOR PANELS NOT MWM)
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
370254 0140 C
EFFECTIVE DATE:
SEPTEMBER 30, 1963
FW-9 Faner p-y Ma-M-t Agmey
r `%
.s
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NC 403
Replace Bridge No. 24 over
Northeast Cape Fear River
Wayne County/Duplin County,
North Carolina
TIP NO. 6-4320
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
MAP
Not to Scale FIGURE 9
APPENDIX
U.S. Department of Agriculture
rAkr1ND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
iT 1 (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request 2 :2 llb
Name Of Project NC J)a T- F_ 4 3,2o 0 k' t C 463 Federal Agency involved w 1/
Proposed nd Use t . Al County And Stat USDA M
e
ietoce ,Ex:4,h? ?rId w- Na, 24- WA Me- Co•,? NG
ART 11 (To be conkpleted.by SCS} - Date Request Received i3 SCS J
Dees the site contain prime unique, statexvide or local important fiarmfand? Ye No Acres Irr=s ea Average ?Fas?r= s zc
Of no, the FPPA does oc t:apply - d'a.nat compLCte ? idiiionai pars of tlrrs rornr).
w
v3agor,,rC>pfs) ? ar-abl n0 In Gov 'urlsdi?tion Amoun YarrilandAs sitsQci in sPPA
oy Acres 3 p o 1 C7 'Ages ; . Z,? 7 T S'
.9 'Z 7
Name Of 1 arx3 Evaku iro^.Sysre 'd ti ara Of i_ocai S..c Assessment 7
System O ;e f Land va ? F2eturneo &y.$CS -
L,L
It r,T 111 /T_ ?_ dltarnntwo Oita Pntmn
Site A Site B Site C Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 0, ( < ??
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site ?. (fl ©o 'Z
kflT IV (robe completed fey SCS)` Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime Arid
8. `'total Acres Statewide'And Local -Important Farmland 5, D
0 , 7b
r. ? PPrcentage.Qf Farmland In County Or.Local.Gavt. tlrzt Fo Be Conueried
13, Per?.e;rLa?r: fJf Farriland la uoyx.turisdicz?pn Wrzh'S:,rne f?rHigne"?irl;?titc V;:Sue , ? i '77?

"F V (Try be complereo'by SCSf, ' '?d- E?Es?atsor? Criterion
fieias i?U Value 0` 7arrnland Tc Be Converted 'Scale of S to ?Sur°oinu

j t

5a
ART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(b) j Maximum
1 Points
1
1. Area In Nonurban Use 1 5 1
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use I p j b 16 to
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed D Jr
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government 2.6
0
0
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area is I ( O Q f 1
6. Distance To Urban Support Services ( p to 10
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average p 11 q

8. Creation Of Nonfarmable Farmland
O
O
O T
V
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
10. On-Farm Investments Za O O 0
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services O O O O
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160
kRT VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V) 100
Total Site Assessment (From Part V/ above or a local
site assessment/ 16G
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines) 260
to Selected:
2son For Selection:
1 Was A Locai Slte Hssessment usear
Date Of Selection i Yes L No 0
:e instructions on reverse side)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
FAR.M..LMAINID CONVERSION g M PACT A?°? ?
iT I (To be completed by Federal Agency) Date Of Land Evaluation Request
I Z aj Of
!dame Of Project N G22bT ¢32 NC 03 Federal Agency Involved V
i '-S e C S
Proposed Land Use County An State
2 lAop, X15 ;' .fSY?d ?c•Z-y- ?t ?A.
%RT 11 (To be completed by SCS) Date Re, est Received By %S
Does the site contain .piime, unique statewide or:Iocal trmportant farmland? Yes . No I Acres :Irrigated Avenge Farm Size
O no, the FPPA doer snot apply c1 o not: complete additional Psa-? df this form). V'o 13 ? d bn ?- i f ? ?? , .
Major Crop/sJ ? Fartnal7le wand it, Grnr* 'u isdictionAmount
{W pa. n lanti As 1)ati? gee in ?FpfsA
C 0 r il _ Aces. 44' 7 ? ....'•, , % -3 ? Acres.. . ? ?
1Far4?e Of Land =v Fuatanrt System usedame Of Local Site Asst>srnzt- System _ Date.. Lend 5%.zluatioa etcrnuai??y SCS
.?? . .r_ Alternative Site Ratina
I i v uc oV Ijj' cccu L/Y r-vuCf of ?y-'r Y/ _
Site A
Site B
Site C
Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly 0 Z 31 1, 7 IS
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
C. Total Acres In Site 0 Z ?,
kRT'IV (To be completed by SCSJ, Land Evaluation I.n#ormatior? I
A. Total Acres Prime And:Unique- Earmlard
:13. Totai Acres Statewide And Local Important Farmland
C. Percentage O#°Farmland 1n Cswnty-Orl_ocal Oavt Unit To3e Converted
e
?. Percentage Of Fa inland -} o .'??u iSd.? i[Tn With Samz tJt ! }sght r r3e:a2ive H3 ue i ?
XRT V (To be completed by_S, `S)_ L:a.nd Evaluation Criterio
Reiiatlw Val ue Of Farml# ao To Be Converxe i S ale of ro ?1 .?r t>>r,)
z
' 0 r
kRT VI (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Assessment Criteria (These criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5(b1 Maximum
Points
1. Area In Nonurban Use rj
2. Perimeter In Nonurban Use J D p (?- i
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed 2 0
I
5
4. Protection Provided By State And Local Government
5. Distance From Urban Builtup Area p p
6. Distance To Urban Support Services 0 9 D p
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average
8. Creation Of Nonfarmabie Farmland O O
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services 5
10. On-Farm Investments Z f'1 0 10 O
11. Effects Of.Conversion On Farm Support Services / a O d O
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use a 0 O 0
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS 160 7 G?
1RT VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Parr VJ 100
Total Site Assessment (From Part V1 above or a local
site assessment!
160
TOTAL PO I NTS (Total of above 2 lines) 260

to Selected:
Date Of Selection Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
Yes 11 No ?
ason For Selection:
!e Jnstructinns on reven:esidel Fnr... n n_tnne /tn_e24
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
Action ID: 200101325
Notification of Jui
Property
Owner: /
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager i/
Project Development & Environmental Analysis
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1548
County: Dur)
risdictional Determination
Authorized Agent:
Jeff Harbour, PWS
Environmental Services, INC
524 New Hope Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): TIP Project No. B-
4320, Bridge NO. 24 on NC 403 over the NE Cape Fear River, Duplin County, North Carolina.
Basis for Determination: Onsite field inspection of selected wetland sites.
Indicate Which of the Following apply:
o There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and surveyed.
The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final jurisdictional
determminabion on your property.
o On October 9.2001, the undersigned inspected the Section 404 jurisdictional line as determined by the NCDOT
and/or its representatives for the subject NCDOT project A select number of wetland sites were inspected for the
proposed project and all were found to accurately reflect the limits of Corps jurisdiction. The Corps believes that
this jurisdictional delineation can be relied on for planning purposes and impact assessment.
v The wetlands on your lot have been delineated and the limits of the Corps jurisdiction have been explained to you.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
o There are no wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the permit requirements of
section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
o The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of Coastal
Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands. on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A
permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you
have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Mr. Dave
Timpy at 910-251-4634.
Project Manager Signature
F 1 66"% 'p- t b, tpol 7y
Date January 2. 2002 Expiration Date January 2. 2007
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE WETLAND
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS FORM.
r?
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
October 22, 2001
IN REPLY REFER M
Regulatory Division
Action ID. 200121178; NC 403, Replace Bridge No. 24 over the Northeast Cape Fear River,
Wayne County, North Carolina, TIP No. B-4320
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
This is in response-to your letter dated June 21, 2001, requesting input on the
replacement of Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over the Northeast Cape Fear, northeast of Mount
Olive, Wayne County, North Carolina (TIP No. B-4320).
Prior Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material
into waters and/or wetlands in conjunction with this project, including temporary impacts for
construction access or bridge demolition, and the disposal of construction debris.
Review of the project indicates that the proposed work may involve the discharge of
excavated or fill material into waters and wetlands. When final plans are completed, including
the extent and location of any work within waters of the United States and wetlands, our
Regulatory Division would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for a proj ect-specific
determination of Department of the Army permit requirements. These plans should include
temporary impacts from any necessary construction access or bridge demolition. Bridge
demolition work should be planned in strict accordance with the latest NCDOT Policy: Bridge
Demolition and Removal in Waters of the United States (BDR Policy), including the Best
Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal. If there are only minor impacts to
waters, including wetlands, the work might be authorized under one or more nationwide or
regional general permits provided avoidance and minimization are adequately addressed.
The Corps of Engineers must assess the impacts of such activities on the aquatic
environment prior to issuing Department of the Army permits. Authorization of aquatic fill
activities requires that the project be water dependent and/or that no practicable alternatives are
available. Our initial review emphasis for North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) projects will focus on the impacts to waters and/or wetlands. However, if degradation
to. other aspects of the natural environment (e.g., habitat of endangered species) is considered to
be of greater concern, an alternative resulting in greater aquatic losses may be chosen as
preferred.
In all cases, and in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement between 'the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and the Corps, the sequencing process of avoidance,
minimization, and compensatory mitigation of unavoidable wetland impacts will be satisfied
prior to the final permit decision. A Department of the Army permit will not be issued until a
final plan for compensatory mitigation is approved. Mitigation for stream impacts may also be
required.
Regarding the alternatives to be studied, the Corps recommends that NCDOT study an
alternative to replace the structure on existing location, and detour traffic on existing roads. This
alternative would likely reduce temporary and permanent impacts to the stream and its stable
bank.
Questions or comments pertaining to permits may be directed to me, at telephone (919)
876-8441, extension 24.
Sincerely,

Jean B. Manuele
Project Manager,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Copy Furnished:
Ms. Emily Lawton
Federal Highway Administration
310 New Bern Ave., Rm 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1442

United States Department of the In
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
August 9, 2001
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North.Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
?Q
4110 13
X441
Thank you for your June 21, 2001, request for information from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) on the potential environmental impacts of proposed bridge replacements in
Nash and Wayne Counties, North Carolina (TIP Nos. B-3681 & B-4320). This report provides
scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves as initial scoping
comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their permitting and/or certification
processes for this project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is planning to replace the following
bridges:
1. B-3681, Bridge No. 277 on SR 1555 over the CSX Railroad, Nash County; and,
2. B4320, Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over NE Cape Fear River, Wayne County.
The following recommendations are provided to assist you in your planning process and to
facilitate a thorough and timely review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practical as outlined in Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act Amendments
of 1977. In regard to avoidance and minimization of impacts, we recommend that proposed
highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways, utility corridors, or
previously developed areas in order to minimize habitat fragmentation and encroachment. Areas
exhibiting high biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and region should be
avoided. Crossings of streams'and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings
and/or occur on a structure wherever feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert structures
that maintain natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and
wildlife passage, should be employed. Highway shoulder and median widths should be reduced
through wetland areas. Roadway embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using
appropriate erosion control devices and techniques. Wherever appropriate, construction in
sensitive areas should occur outside fish spawning and migratory bird nesting seasons.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map of the Rocky Mount 7.5 Minute Quadrangle does
not show wetland resources in the CSX work area. The NWI map of the Williams 7.5 Minute
Quadrangle does show wetland resources in the project area. However, while the NWI maps are
useful for providing an overview of a given area, they should not be relied upon in lieu of a
detailed wetland delineation by trained personnel using an acceptable wetland classification
methodology. Therefore, in addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the
environmental documentation for this project include the following in sufficient detail to
facilitate a thorough review of the action.
1. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be
impacted by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact
should be differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the
National Wetlands Inventory. Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps).
2. If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend that every effort be
made to identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance. Project planning should
include a detailed compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland
impacts. Opportunities to protect mitigation areas in perpetuity, preferably via
conservation easement, should be explored at the outset.
The document presents a number of scenarios for replacing each bridge, ranging from in-place to
relocation, with on-site and off-site detours. The Service recommends that each bridge be
replaced on the existing alignment with an off-site detour.
The enclosed list identifies the federally-listed endangered and threatened species, and Federal
Species of Concern (FSC) that are known to occur in Nash and Wayne Counties. The Service
recommends that habitat requirements for the listed species be compared with the available
habitats at the respective project sites. If suitable habitat is present within the action area of the
project, biological surveys for the listed species should be performed. Environmental
documentation that includes survey methodologies, results, and NCDOT's recommendations
based on those results, should be provided to this office for review and comment.
FSC's are those plant and animal species for which the Service remains concerned, but further
biological research and field study are needed to resolve the conservation status of these taxa.
Although FSC's receive no statutory protection under the ESA, we would encourage the NCDOT
to be alert to their potential presence, and to make every reasonable effort to conserve them if
found. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be contacted for information on
species under state protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise us
during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Tom
McCartney at 919-8564520, Ext. 32.
Sincerely,
Dr. Garland B. Pardue
Ecological Services Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: COE, Raleigh, NC (Eric Alsmeyer)
COE, Washington, NC (Michael F. Bell)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (John Hennessy)
NCDNR, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:08/08/01:919/856-4520 extension 32:\2bdgnash.wak
. CO! 1 ON NA-Mi E SCIENTIFIC NA.PME STATUS
WATAUGA COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bog turtle :- Clemmys muhlenbergii T(S/A)'
Hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganiensis FSC
Cerulean warbler Dendroica cerulea FSC
Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus Endangered
Alleghany woodrat Neotoma magister FSC*
Kanawha.minnow Phenacobius teretulus FSC
Southern water shrew Sorer palustris punctulatus FSC*
Appalachian cottontail Sylvilagus obscurus FSC*
Invertebrates
Green floater Lasmigona subviridus FSC
Diana fritillary butterfly Speyeria dana FSC
Vascular Plants
Fraser fir Abies fraseri FSC
Mountain bittercress Cardamine clematitis FSC
Tall larkspur Delphinium exaltatum FSC
Glade spurge Euphorbia purpurea FSC**
Bent avens Geum geniculatum FSC
Spreading avens Geum radiatum Endangered
Roan Mountain bluet Houstonia montana (=Hedyotrs purpurea Endangered
var. montana)
Butternut Juglans cinerea FSC
Heller's blazing star Liatris helleri Threatened
Gray's lily Lilium grayi FSC
Bog bluegrass Poa paludigena FSC*
WAYM COUNTY
Vertebrates
Rafinesque's big-eared bat Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) rafinesquii FSC*
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus FSC*
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Invertebrates
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaia masoni FSC
Vascular Plants
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis FSC
WMIKES COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T(S/A)'
Cerulean warbler Dendroica cerulea FSC
January 15, 1999 Page 46 of 49
E North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: Derrick Weaver
Project Development-Engineer, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor ' for
Habitat Conservation Program j
vL.Jc?.?•0 G?
DATE: March 18, 2002
SUBJECT: NCDOT Bridge Replacements in Hyde, Nash, Pasquotank, and Wayne counties
of North Carolina. TIP Nos. B-3858, B-3681, B-4222, and B-4320.
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(e)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
On bridge replacement projects of this scope our standard recommendations are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream. .
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Te_h-nhnnee MICA 711-14-41 PYf ')81 • F-Q. /o10% 71C_7Ld2
Bridge Memo 2 March 18, 2002
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim
Savidge should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used
where possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimi a sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants.into streams.
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for fish passage. Generally, this means that the
culvert or pipe invert is buried at least 1 foot below the natural stream bed. If
multiple cells are required the second and/or third cells should be placed so that their
bottoms are at stream bankful stage (similar to Lyonsfield design). This could be
Bridge Memo
3 March 18, 2002
accomplished by constructing a low sill on the upstream end of the other cells that
will divert low flows to another cell. This will allow sufficient water depth in the
culvert or pipe during normal flows to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are
long, notched baffles should be placed in reinforced concrete box culverts at 15 foot
intervals to allow for the collection of sediments in the culvert, to reduce flow
velocities, and to provide resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms moving
through the structure.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated so that no channel realignment or widening is
required. Widening of the stream channel at the inlet or outlet of structures usually
causes a decrease in water velocity causing sediment deposition that will require future
maintenance.
4. Riprap should not be placed on the stream bed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minim;e the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore
the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for the subject
project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-3858 -Hyde County- Bridge No. 6 on SR 1110 over Lake Landing Canal (Grays Ditch).
Due to the-potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes an in-water
work moratorium from February 15 to June 15. We are not aware of any threatened of
endangered species in the project vicinity. Standard comments apply.
2. B-3681- Nash County- Bridge No. 277 on SR 1555 over CSX Railroad. No Comment.
3. B4222 - Pasquotank County - Bridge No. 24 on SR 1140 over Halls Creek. Due to the
potential for andromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes an in-water work
moratori= from February 15 to June 15. We are not aware of any threatened of endangered
species in the project vicinity. Standard comments apply.
4. B-4320 - Wayne County - Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over the Northeast Cape Fear River.
Due to the potential for anadromous fish at this location, NCDOT should closely follow the
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage". This includes an in-water
work moratorium from February 15 to June 15. We are not aware of any threatened of
endangered species in the project vicinity. Standard comments apply.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
Bridge Memo
4 March 18, 2002
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 13, 2001
NCDENR
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager, NCDOT, Pro )t Development & Environmental Analysis
From: John E. Hennessy, NC Division of Water Quali4,eA/
Subject: Scoping comments on the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over the Northeast
Cape Fear River in Wayne County, TIP B?161? State Project No. 8.211702.
Reference your correspondence dated June 21. 2001, in which you requested scoping comments for the
referenced project. Preliminary analysis of the project reveals that the proposed bridge will span the
Northeast Cape Fear River in the Cape Fear River Basin. The DWQ index number for the stream is 18-74-
(1) and the stream is classified as Class C SW waters. The Division of Witer Quality requests that NCDOT
consider the following environmental issues for the proposed project:
A. The document should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping.
B. For any proposed stream relocation (and any other stream relocation) will have to be approved by
the NCDWQ as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification review. In addition, the relocated stream
will need to be designed and constructed using natural channel design techniques.
C. There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is required,
it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental
documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted
that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance
of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
D. Review of the project reveals that no Outstanding Resource Waters, Water Supply Water, High
Quality Waters, or Trout Waters will be impacted during the project implementation. However,
should further analysis reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned waters, the DWQ requests
that DOT strictly adhere to North Carolina regulations entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0024) throughout design and construction of the project. This would
apply for any area that drains to streams having WS (Water Supply), ORW (Outstanding Resource
Water), HQW (High Quality Water), SA (Shellfish Water) or Tr (Trout Water) classifications.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North -Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% p ost-consumer paper
.vii William D. Gilmore memn
07/13/01
Page 3
E When practical, the DWQ requests that bridges be replaced on the existing location with road
closure. If a detour proves necessary, remediation measures in accordance with the NCDWQ
requirements for General 401 Certification 2726/Nationwide Permit No. 33 (Temporary
Construction, Access and Dewaterins) must be followed.
F. Review of the project reveals that no High Quality Waters or Water Supply Waters will be impacted
by the project. However, should further analysis reveal the presence of any of the aforementioned
water resources, the DWQ requests that hazardous spill catch basins be installed at any bridge
crossing a stream classified as HQW or WS (Water Supply). The number of catch basins installed
should be determined by the design of the bridge, so that runoff would enter said basin(s) rather than
flowing directly into the stream.
G. If applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the maximum extent
practicable.
H. Wetland and stream impacts should be avoided (including sediment and erosion control
structures/measures) to the maximum extent practical. If this is not possible, alternatives that
minimize wetland impacts should be chosen. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts will be required h'
DWQ for impacts to wetlands in excess of one acre and/or to streams in excess of 150 linear feet.
1. Borrow/waste areas should not be located in wetlands. It is likely that compensatory mitigation will
be required if wetlands are impacted by waste or borrow.
7. DWQ prefers replacement of bridges with bridges. However, if the new structure is to be a culvert, it
should be countersunk to allow unimpeded fish and other aquatic organisms passage through the
crossing.
K If foundation test borings are necessary; it should:be noted in the document Geotechnical• work is
approved under General 401 Certification Number 3027/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey
Activities.
L. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6) ), mitigation will be
required for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that
mitigation becomes required, the mitigation plan should be designed to replace appropriate lost
functions and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules 115A NCAC 2H.0506
(h)(3) ), the Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
M. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
N. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed
methods for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to
discharge directly into the creek. Instead, stormwater should be designed to drain to a properly
designed stormwater detention facility/apparatus.
0. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps and soil surveys is a useful office tool,
their inherent inaccuracies require that qualified personnel perform onsite .wetland delineations prior
to permit approval.
Mh William ii. Gilmorc memo
u7/I WO I
Page i
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met
and desi;nated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information.
please contact John Hennessy at [phone].
cc: Mike Bell. Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Tom McCartney. USFWS
David Cox. NCWRC
Personal Files
File Copy
C:\wAM\T1P B-?IS,'tc3\cor ments\B "ing commenuAbc
43W L[V)2,-
Ay ? N
C
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
David L. S. Brook, Administrator ' ,n
Michael F. Easley, Governor Division 6f;Airchiv6s d..History
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crows Director
August 6, 2001
MEMORANDUM
To: William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
NCDOT, Project Development & ?Environmental Analysis Branch
From: David Brook Estd>--
Deputy State Histo ' Preservation Officer
Re: Replace Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over northeast Cape Fear River,
BRSTP-403(3), 8.1331881, B-4320, Wayne County, ER 01-10084
Thank you for your memorandum of June 21, 2001, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties of architectural, historic,
or archaeological significance, which would be affected by the project Therefore, we have no
comment on the project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106
codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Eafley, Environmental Review Coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:kgc
cc: Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT
T. Padgett, NCDOT
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
Administration 507 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4617 [phone].733-8653
Restoration 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4613 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4613 [phone].715-4801
Survey & Planning 515 N. Blount St, Raleigh, NC 4618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh 27699-4618 [phone].715-4801

Federal Aid # BRSTP-403(3) TIP # B-4320 County: Wayne
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 24 on NC 403 over Northeast Cape Fear River
81/p/scol
On °.';"?-ter, representatives of the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
? Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
? Other Al
Reviewed the subject project at
?/ Scoping meeting
Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
? Other
All parties present agreed
? There are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria Consideration G within the
project's area of potential effects.
There are properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE), but based on the
historical information available and the photographs of each property, the properties identified as
G '- 24 are considered not eligible for the National Register and no further
evaluation them is necessary.
There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
D All properties greater than 50 years of age located in the APE have been considered at this consultation, and based
upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
? There are no historic properties affected by this project. (Attach any notes or documents as needed)
Signed:
A
FHWA, for the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency

Representative, HPO
Z/3a
State Historic Preservation Officer
if a survey report is prepared; a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.
41

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR `? SECRETARY
June 7, 2004 ap'j
ab
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 24699-1652
Dear Sir:
Subject: The Replacement of Bridge No. 24 over Northeast Cape Fear River on NC 403,
Wayne/Duplin Counties, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-403(3), State Project
No. 8.1331801, TIP B-4320, Division 4.
NCDOT requests that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) provide
confirmation that the EEP is willing to provide compensatory mitigation for the above-
mentioned project in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed July 22,
2003 by the USACE, the NCDENR, and the NCDOT. Bridge No. 24 will be replaced in the
existing location with a cored slab bridge, approximately 105 feet in length with a 40-foot clear
roadway width. The structure will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with eight feet of lateral
clearance on each side. The new approach roadway will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with
eight feet grass shoulders. A design speed of 60 mph will be provided.
There are jurisdictional wetlands associated with this project with impacts totaling 0.13 acres.
Of these impacts, 0.12 acres is mechanized clearing, and mitigation is required. Surface waters
will not be impacted by the construction of the bridge.
We have avoided and minimized the impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent
possible as described in the permit application. A copy of the permit application can be found at
http://www.ncdot.or /planning/pe/naturaluliit/Applications.html. The remaining impacts to
jurisdictional resources will be compensated for by mitigation provided by the EEP program. We
estimate that 0.13 acres of coastal plain, bottomland hardwood, riverine wetlands will be
impacted.
The project is located in the coastal plain Physiographic Province in Wayne/Duplin Counties in
the Cape Fear River basin in Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 03030007.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Mr. Mike Bell, P.W.S., at U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office, P.O. Box 1000, Washington, NC 27889-1000.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
FAX number is [phone]. The current let date for the project is March 15, 2005 for which
the let review date is January 15, 2005.
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed, the NCDWQ
requires a formal letter from EEP indicating their willingness and ability to provide the
mitigation work requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a letter of
confirmation be addressed to Mr. John Hennessy of NCDWQ with copies submitted to
NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Chris Underwood at
[phone].
Sincerely,
4a. Gregory Vh.rppe, PhD, Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr.. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (2 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. John Sullivan, FHWA
Mr. Anthony W. Roper, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Project Plann
i '+u2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR A? SECRETARY
June 7, 2004
01 v WETLANDS / 401 GROUP
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E. JUN Y 5
EEP Transition Manager Z??4
Ecosystem Enhancement Program WATER QUALITY
1652 Mail Service Center SECTION
Raleigh, NC 24699-1652
Dear Sir:
Subject: The Replacement of Bridge No. 24 over Northeast Cape Fear River on NC 403,
Wayne/Duplin Counties, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-403(3), State Project
No. 8.1331801, TIP B-4320, Division 4.
NCDOT requests that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) provide
confirmation that the EEP is willing to provide compensatory mitigation for the above-
mentioned project in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed July 22,
2003 by the USACE, the NCDENR, and the NCDOT. Bridge No. 24 will be replaced in the
existing location with a cored slab bridge, approximately 105 feet in length with a 40-foot clear
roadway width. The structure will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with eight feet of lateral
clearance on each side. The new approach roadway will provide two 12-foot travel lanes with
eight feet grass shoulders. A design speed of 60 mph will be provided.
There are jurisdictional wetlands associated with this project with impacts totaling 0.13 acres.
Of these impacts, 0.12 acres is mechanized clearing, and mitigation is required. Surface waters
will not be impacted by the construction of the bridge.
We have avoided and minimized the impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent
possible as described in the permit application. A copy of the permit application can be found at
http://www.ncdot.ora/planiiing/Te/natural unit/Applications.html. The remaining impacts to
jurisdictional resources will be compensated for by mitigation provided by the EEP program. We
estimate that 0.13 acres of coastal plain, bottomland hardwood, riverine wetlands will be
impacted.
The project is located in the coastal plain Physiographic Province in Wayne/Duplin Counties in
the Cape Fear River basin in Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 03030007.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Mr. Mike Bell, P.W.S., at U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office, P.O. Box 1000, Washington, NC 27889-1000.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

FAX number is [phone]. The current let date for the project is March 15, 2005 for which
the let review date is January 15, 2005.
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed, the NCDWQ
requires a formal letter from EEP indicating their willingness and ability to provide the
mitigation work requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a letter of
confirmation be addressed to Mr. John Hennessy of NCDWQ with copies submitted to
NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Chris Underwood at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Q-1 -
Grego+J.horpe, PhD, Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (2 copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
w/o attachment
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. John Sullivan, FHWA
Mr. Anthony W. Roper, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jamie Shern, DEO
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Project Plann

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR
March 24, 2005
WBS Element: 33657.3.2 B-43201
a9??on-
F? 2 C?
LYNDO ETT
SfiCRETAR
Contract No.: C200969
F. A. No.: BRSTP403 (100)
Counties: Wayne/Duplin
Description: Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River & Approaches on NC 403
SUBJECT: PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AND PERMIT MEETING
Mr. Randall Gattis
Sanford Contractors, Inc.
628 Rocky Fork Church Road
Sanford. North Carolina 27332
Dear Mr. Gattis:
Per our conversation, the Preconstruction Conference and Permit Meeting for this project is being
scheduled for Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. The Preconstruction Conference is
contingent upon the award of the project by the Board of Transportation. The conference will be
held in the Conference Room of the Wilson Division Office. Our office is located at 509 Ward
Boulevard in Wilson, N. C.
Please be prepared to present the following documents at this conference: progress schedule, letter
naming persons authorized to sign Supplemental Agreen;ents, and letter naming your Company
EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer.
We look forward to meeting with you at the above time.
Cordially yours,
Wendi O. Johnson, PE
Division Construction Engineer
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Mr. Randall Gattis
March 24, 2005
Page 2
c: Ron Lucas (FHWA)
Dr. Garland Pardue (US Fish & Wildlife)
Nicole Thomson (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality)
Pat McClain (NCDENR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Tony Grantham (Tri-County EMC)
Kevin Pfautz (BellSouth)
ec: Scott L. VanHorn (NCWRC)
Mike Bell (US Army Corps of Engineers)
Cecil L. Jones, PE
Donald Pearson
Robert Simpson
Andy Brown, PE
Bryant Bunn, PE
Mike Robinson, PE
Andy Pridgen
Shannon Sweitzer, PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Kevin Bowen, PE
Kevin Lacy, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Ellis C. Powell, PE
Don G. Lee
K. J. Kyung, Ph.D., PE
Jimmy Mader
Jamie Shern
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Ashley Reid
D. R. Henderson, PE
Jermery Armstrong
Ronnie Moore
Tim Little, PE
Gerald McCauley
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF.
September 9, 2004
Regulatory Division
Subject: Action ID No. 200411289 and Nationwide Permit No. 23 (Approved Categorical
Exclusions)
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
N.C. Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
WETLANDS/ 401 CROUP
SEP 13 2004
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Reference your Categorical Exclusion Document and permit application, dated March 5,
2004, for the replacement of Bridge No. 24 over the Northeast Cape Fear River on NC 403, in
Wayne/Duplin Counties, North Carolina (Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-403 (3), State Project
No. 8.1331801, TIP No. B-4320). The stated purpose of the project is to replace the currently
functionally obsolete and structurally deficient bridge with new safer and more efficient bridge.
The preferred alternative will be built using top-down construction and will adversely impact .13
acres of wetlands adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. Traffic will be maintained using
off-site detours.
For the purposes of the Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program, Title 33, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 330.6, published in the Federal Register on November 22, 1991,
lists nationwide permits. Authorization pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, was provided for activities undertaken,
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed, in whole or part, by another Federal agency
or department where that agency or department has determined, pursuant to the CEQ Regulation
for the Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, that
the activity, work or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental documentation
because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually nor cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment, and the Office of the Chief of Engineers has
been furnished notice of the agency's or department's application for the categorical exclusion
and concurs with that determination.
Review of this project indicates that the construction of the new bridge will adversely
impact 0.13 acres of riverine wetlands. The wetland impacts are from the increased approach
roadway fill needed for the proposed bridge structure. The new bridge will provide wider road
shoulders on both sides of the new structure for safety.
Your work is authorized under Nationwide Permit 23, Categorical Exclusion, provided it
is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed Nationwide Permit Conditions and the
following special conditions:
a. Compensatory mitigation for the unavoidable impacts to 0.13 acres of wetlands
associated with the proposed project shall be provided by the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP), as provided for by the acceptance letter dated August 5, 2004, from William D. Gilmore,
EEP Transition Manager. The EEP will provide 1.30 acres of riverine wetland preservation in
the southern interior coastal plain Eco-Region. Pursuant to the EEP MOA between the State of
North Carolina and the US Army Corps of Engineers signed on July 22, 2003, the EEP will
provide a minimum of. 13 acres of riverine wetland restoration in Hydrologic Cataloging Unit
03030000 by July 22, 2005 and half of the proposed preservation would be available at that time
for mitigation for other project impacts. The NCDOT shall, within 30 days of the issue date of
this permit, certify that sufficient funds have been provided to EEP to complete the required
mitigation, pursuant to Paragraph V. of the MOA.
b. To avoid adverse impacts to spawning populations of fish, anadromous and resident
species at the project site, NCDOT will follow the "Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous
Fish Passage."
c. To avoid adverse impacts to spawning populations of fish species at this project site,
no in-water work will be conducted between February 15 and June 15. For the purpose of this
moratorium, in water is defined as those areas that are inundated at mean high water.
d. Bridge deck drains will not discharge directly into Northeast Cape Fear River and will
not be located water-ward of the riprap alignment under the bridge.
e. No bridge demolition debris or excavated or fill material will be placed at any time, in
any wetlands or surrounding waters, outside of the alignment of the fill area indicated on the
work plans.
f. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within
waters or vegetated wetlands are not authorized.
g. All excavated materials will be confined above normal high water and landward of
regularly or irregularly flooded wetlands behind adequate dikes or retaining structures to prevent
spillover of solids into any wetlands or surrounding waters.
2
h. The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities.
Metal products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used.
i. All measures will be taken to avoid any temporary fill from entering into Northeast
Cape Fear River from bridge demolition. Bridge demolition shall follow NCDOT best
management practices for construction and maintenance activities dated August 2003 and
incorporate NCDOT policy entitled "Bridge Demolition and Removal in Waters of the United
States" dated September 20, 1999.
j. Except as authorized by this permit or any USACE approved modification to this
permit, no excavation, fill, or mechanized land-clearing activities shall take place at any time in
the construction or maintenance of this project, within waters or wetlands, or any activities that
cause the degradation of waters or wetlands, except as authorized by this permit, or any
modification to this permit. This permit does not authorize temporary placement or double
handling of excavated or fill material within waters or wetlands outside the permitted area.
There shall be no excavation from, waste disposal into, or degradation of, jurisdictional waters or
wetlands associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit, including
appropriate compensatory mitigation. This prohibition applies to all borrow and fill activities
connected with this project.
k. To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on high ground and do not result
in the degradation of adjacent wetlands and streams, except as authorized by this permit, the
permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to identify all areas to be used to borrow
material, or to dispose of dredged, fill, or waste material. The permittee shall provide the
USACE with appropriate maps indicating the locations of proposed borrow or waste sites as
soon as the permittee has that information. The permittee will coordinate with the USACE
before approving any borrow or waste sites that are within 400 feet of any streams or wetlands.
The permittee shall ensure that all such areas comply with condition 0) of this permit, and shall
require and maintain documentation of the location and characteristics of all borrow and disposal
sites associated with this project. This information will include data regarding soils, vegetation
and hydrology sufficient to clearly demonstrate compliance with the preceding condition 0). All
information will be available to the USACE upon request. NCDOT shall require its contractors
to complete and execute reclamation plans for each waste and borrow site and provide written
documentation that the reclamation plans have been implemented and all work is completed.
This documentation will be provided to the Corps of Engineers within 30 days of the completion
of the reclamation work.
1. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and
conditions of this permit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide
each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this
project with a copy of this permit. A copy of this permit, including all conditions and any Corps
approved modifications shall be available at the project site during construction and maintenance
of this project.
in. Any violation of these conditions or violations of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act must be reported in writing to the Wilmington
District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, within 24 hours of the violation.
n. Failure to institute and carry out the details of special conditions a. - m., above, may
result in a directive to cease all ongoing and permitted work within waters and/or wetlands
associated with TIP No. B-4320, or such other remedy as the District Engineer or his authorized
representatives may seek.
This nationwide permit does not relieve you of the responsibility to obtain any required
State or local approval. This permit will be valid for two years from the date of this letter unless
the nationwide authorization is modified, reissued or revoked.
Thank you for your time and cooperation. Questions or comments may be addressed to
Mr. Michael F. Bell, Washington Regulatory Field Office, Post Office Box 1000, Washington,
North Carolina, 27889, or telephone [phone], extension 26.
Sincerely,
E. David Franklin
Chief, NCDOT Team
Enclosures
Copies Furnished (without enclosures)
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
North Carolina Division of Environment
and Natural Resources
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Mr. Travis Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
1142 I-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522

Mr. Pete Benjamin
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
101 Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Chris Militscher
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Raleigh Office
310 New Bern Avenue, Room 206
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601