NCG060317_Inspection_20200331

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRIAN WRENN
AcdngDirecfor
Bay State Milling Company
Attention: Charles McClean
448 North Main Street
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 31, 2020
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Bay State Milling Company
NPDES Certificate of Coverage — NCG060317
Iredell County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. McClean:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for the inspection we
conducted at the Bay State Milling facility on March 24, 2010. Please note that in the stormwater
inspection report summary we ask that you continue to implement your Stormwater Pollution Prevention
program.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] or by E-mail at [e-mail].
Enclosure
c: Laserfiche
Sincerely,
James Moore
Assistant Regional Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
_ Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3.011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
m imwmrV sd'"/ 7na(,A.i7haA

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060317 Effective: 11/01/18 Expiration: 05/31/21 Owner: Bay State Milling Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Bay State Milling Company
County: Iredell 448 North Main
Region: Mooresville
Mooresville NC 28115
Contact Person: John Campbell Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/24/2026
Primary Inspector: Lily C Kay
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time 10:30AM Exit Time: 11:30AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine I Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG060317 Owner - Facility: Bay State Milling Company
Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The facility appeared well operated and maintained and have implemented their Stormwater Pollution Prevetion Plan
(SWPPP)with all necessary documentation. If you have questions, contact me at [e-mail] or by phone at (704)
235 2137.

Permit: NCG060317 Owner - Facility: Bay State Milling Company
Inspection Date: 03/24/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑.
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?N
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and related documentation was complete
including employee training records, monitoring records, and the annual.certification. The facility
appeared well operated and maintained.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
0❑ 1111
Comment: Qualitative monitoring records were available and complete.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
1113 ❑
Comment: Analvtical monitorina records were available and all parameters were within the benchmark
limitations.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑N ❑
Comment: Yard inlets lead to two outlets in the back of the facility beyond the railroad tracks. The facilibL
may qualify for representative outfall status since the same processes are conducted in both
drainage areas.
Page 3 of 3