20040694 Ver 1_Complete File_20040427

t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL, F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPET"I'
GOVERNOR SECRE JARY
September 23, 2002
STATE PROJECT: S. 2442901 ('J
F. A. PROJECT: STP-1 141(7)
COUNTY: Cumberland
DESCRIPTION: SR 1141 (BINGHAM DR) FROM PROPOSED HOPE
MILLS BYP TO US 401 (RAEFORD RD))
MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.
Natural Resources/Permits. Mitigation Unit, PD&EA
FROM: D. R. Henderson, PE 4v?U L>
State Hydraulics Engineer
SUBJECT:
Permit Action
The hydraulic design phase for the above identified project has been completed. The
following are the environmental permit requirements as identified at this time by:
(A) Planning Document: A North Carolina I)IvIsIOIa ofd Water Quality_LIM Section 401-Water
(Zuality General Certification % ill he required prior to the Issuance of the Section 104.111di Idual
PcFniit.-- Final _nutigation decisions Nvill rest \? ith the authority if the Cgrps_ot 1 n_,inccrs.
(B) I lydrological and Hydraulic Design Studies: The wetlan(Is_WCre delitrcated buy
represcntaives ot'NC1)0'1'. The total area under inipact is 0.245 Acres. The followino is the status of the permit drawings and application (when applicable).
The drawin are attached.
cc: Mrs. D. ?l. Barbour, ['1'. (Iligh??ay Design) ?','o att.
Mr. J. Victor BancOuu', P.E. (Dcsi(,'n SCrviCCS) w/o aft.
Mr. Dav id Rhodcs (Program Dcvclopnacnt) \\'o att.
Mr. Ron (SCiacduling Unit) w o att.
Project file
MAILING AOORESS: IF r P11) ""'0 11;40 LOCATION:
NCn<<v.•i?.??%TOi FAX C?N1,1r-C1 T; 1tC_t';'.[,
11... "v t 1, " Wj'! - N,,. .,. B
kI. SI I C!N'i Ei ..? I, f' ? "r.;
R,?,. NC t?rI I`90 Ru:. NC
rn
v

c
o c
w

Z z
o m vi ?
o

:D
~ > r ' ' oo

O

D-
Z = QL

in
0

n-=o N o

U Z u u0

(Y) 0
::
CL O

Q
LL.

C\
O W
CO
Q
Z _j
!
OZQ? ao ONE
J_
O
N 00F
~
:2 U 2
[ l O
Q u Z

O O
O
LU U Of m 2
m Z ? v
- ~
0_ W
vl 2

U N

m
w
J
J
W I

D Q ?
y
U
a
P2f S??,W
a
CO
(n _,
?

o ado} N
J
J
n = F
-1 S?/ `
W
- u O
~
u v
O
7
O n CO
aCD) Z:';
=
rrl w
F c' rll
w i
CJ r'l
z ?.
N c0 D
w
??
v 8inyham Rd.

l
C ~
,_ v OBI

J Q \____?__ O~I MI
G
n'
Jam, ?
O
I, .'?1 ??'f'd'• ` `' r??r?} I '?F ?y1Qt, +?'?? r,?[I?.lr;i? ? ?' '?=KSM?I.'?a?'i.`5' .? ?i ? J v
.-.•5, -p1e?- ? r ? Y?. r N'? ?;•"S1Y ly? ? ?,Jyt,: ! 41 - •, v1
¦ - r -ia• C 'V vm^ '?C115i t?F +Gf !• ?' •"'{ ?YM , ;,-
_ ? ? I ( •??+N y ?I ,+??1/rlL4L1;? y? V'I t.? ,y}??YM:?1• rr , ? .
LLJ
W
--_ I r
-ALI
1.
W.j
17
_ ??? nom/ ?? ?"? /I; ?? ??? A? ?. ??. •o •/%
rya ?? co C Y) - W V 4
z in
r it
T I I d
2p Dino
S p p Q
Z c? Q, 0:- a- (D ) "- 1) ' H?
??, ?I
c o N LL >- m
C) m
N ci V) ?'•.
O w O R[ ?, v? y?A 1
' CC) F- Q V ,• ?r ?? 1
1 U 2 - r? . •? ( r? ?..?
111 Vl _ (• 1L \,_
LL J C)
U a- C)
In

-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
L

W L
WETLAND

?
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
--
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL
Mal SURFACE WATER
R
P
(
OND) SINGLE TREE
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND ?L_.r `L r .Lr t-r t WOODS LINE
DENOTES EXCAVATION
1?1!C////i1
IN WETLAND ¦
DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
'• •• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
- ROOTWAD
• CLEARING
FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP
TB
-- TOP TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
-- -- ------ PROP. LIMIT OF CUT IF AVAILABLE
- - F-- -- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-A
AM- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
- - NG --- -- NATURAL GROUND
-- ---P1---- - PROPERTY LINE - ----
- TOE -- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
_ PDE ---- PERMANENT DRAIN'1GE_ - -
EASEMENI LEVEL. SPREADER (LS)
--EAB---- EXIST. ENDANGEREC
ANIMAL BOUNDAR',"
DITCH /
- EPB- FXISI. EtiCANGFRF GRASS SWALE
PLANT BOUNDARY -
- - WATER SURFACE
x x x
x x
LIVE STAKES
x x x N. C. UI?!?"F. O1 l'IZANSl?OR'1'A'I'ION

C ROUI_DFR DIVISION OF HIGHIVAI'S
--- CURE 1 11??FZ ROLL_-; CUMBERLAND COUN"I'1"
PROJECT: N.24ti2901 (l'-351111)
SR 11,'1 (BIN(;II,A M DR-) FROM PROPOSED
HOPE MILLS Ill'P:\SS '!'O
U.S.101 (RAFUDRD RD.)
SHFF,I' OF 7- '?; 2002

CO
r'
c
?U
C
is
(-J
V\T
I

U-1
II
I
r ?II

"I Ii i I
I?
I I I Iii
i

i t ?, 11 II r
i
ci
-- LJ
Ho '
- NLE3

\LL VI
.\ I
I i
ILL.
I
t I
Y
N 'l

liJ
'I
LL

1

w
0 N
IL -
I
I I
II
1

C) N
ul
7 Vl ?
\ F, aJ d N

\ < V)

?
CD
?o
I
Paz a
cc
\ =°° <°

\ Q 0
° m
? W

O
Q N Q a
\ 4 pZEo3 J

w>>w CDujV)
C)° co
K
a m =
-
~
?? w
vi Lli

\ y
- M 17L g
#
'x + oz
LLy
_u
?? ? a c Y N
c , l LL. ? , U
uj F'.?
I I ??
1
1 1 J ?
I 1 I -, '
LIJ
=n • C
I
kI
F o v; v
w
J ? z
`-y
Q
Il.
Q
ter,
i
'a
?J
I!
1
I!
?r
- z CJ ° C.)
Q S In
w
U ?, H In S J
w > z? ?o
- r / I ?_ I I I ?? n m L F
° w
I I I I z 'T
S w
'? - /PDE - I; s I
? 'F) CO RPE
'All C-17,
c
- Dad - I
W U , LU
w r' w
PDE PDE
i
- w
w \; Q
o - - ?_
,
0,6",
! I
Dad j i Dad
w W
i
I
? ry
o? `r
?N
w w
1.

rT-l
\ 1
I
\ 1 ?
\ LL-
J
\
\ \ Q
cr- \
\ \

O O \ Q
O \
\ O
\

O
N
\
O++
^v.` Z I \\ Q
ry N
ry F \
_ \
\
Q- W>QC? \

\ \ Q
\ \ z:t J

zzo

3
i
z
ti
O
O
W
m
Q-
CL?
ti
ti
ti
Q
J
V
W
W j
00
+I ?
? o
^ O ti
W -
O Q
CL?
O O
^ O
W I Q W LL-

O
Q: -

ti
ct:

Q)
o
ti °
O

Lij
/ LLJ
Z) C
w co
Q
Z) O

L-Li
*
JC
f
?
i _?rrf1
J
W
ti
J
W
q
ct:
C)
O
O
I J i Ql
C) C+
o C 1
f`
W
J
Q
j
O
L7

I /
1
I
I Z
I ~
I ct?
II Q
I I
1 ?
1 I cl?
I /
I
_L

O
O
M
N
r
O
O
N
N
r-
0
O
N
r
O
O
O
N
r
O
O
r-
? N
W _
Z ONO O
CO 0 v \
O Vl r
O ZZ:) 0
n S O_ O F 0
N O
Z U 'O N a:
O
p N Oct:
W Zv?
oa d.
Q"o}o
W J N .0
z a: w
o2 W,, <n?
H V) 2 J
W U J
0
p U 0 o
O CO
w
U W CL W
Z = W
N V)
`i
.i u
i
PARCEL NO.
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES ADDRESSES
120 W.H. ELLIOT JR.
KEMP-P,OBINSON FAMILY
121
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
122 ARRAN LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH
126 VJi,_L14?I Ff. ELLIOT III
P.O. Box 9267
Fayetteville, NC 28311-7696
3284 Bethlehem Rd.
Blackstocl,, SC 29014-8907
1130 Bingham Dr.
Fayetteville, NC 283C4
P.O. Box 40254
Fayetteville, NC 28309-0254
l' C. L,EP T. 0 i f-'.??,SF
DI'dISI??PI OF FCi;H7? ;Y'?

E: c-
co .? - I
a) p
z ? o
c c
I? in co a LO

Q w U E
n.

tY
w
F
LL

Q C). U
E c
o

w
U

LL ^
U v
C U
U) O m O
ii

u) E
'

CD

(3)
C ~
(9 fD
v O
o

Z
LL
0
N N
m v U
N

N
[1
C - m N N

N C D ? •-
b O U ti
(
L U
p O
a) O

O v
C
F- p
? c
U
Q -
m a? m
v
o

x

Q LL C

~ m ^
U ° rn

l
LLJ E N
V C) C
?

n S C)
p

C v
c -i - _
- R7 U .--
C)
p

W c?
I
d
? II
P j
ul (3)
U
T
f ?c3)
C14I U N j
j
U -
r4 Z II

o
o
J
4 w Uw I j

I U)
~
X
? d ? j I I
? I
Ln m
i
i I
j I I

C
O
C) +
C O
U O N
m

0
N
V> u O ? F- I

LEI C'
r. I I I ? I

u, f f Q
w
U
?4 y
YI
•.?wY ?? ??,P '1 y?? t ?f
ev:,4.Jd:?,.
a 200

m ?
M `
e M
? I
C
0 0
f'
a
H
L?
0
c?
c?
W
W ice.
W
O
^ coi
ww
rw?
O
a ?
? e
rw?rw
C
U 0.W,
O
ti
0 n -
0
O
QI ? ~ \
'0I
h w p
(y _ -rN 115 401
Rl+£FORO RO
TO H0
I r
sLnn
3n1A7113M1
o o $
a
2 ?

2 ~
O 20 Q
p
0. j vi
J
?
m ? $
?' = 2
O I 8
0 m j U
z -?
m
a +
°

$ ° o
2 m
°
- n
z
0.

?? t
z
2
WWW
? 0.

a N

c
`
r ? v
i
e ' s

z
? V
N

°

?'-. to o j ? ° ° ° I? W 2 W
° _
\ cc~ ~

'
Q

W I
N

I
p

U

_
In

cc Q)

-t

,-

O

U T W

h
h
V
??
? ? I z
oh ?
m - ? ???
N
? W W
m
l
W i
i
2
0 0. 0

n cO
Q'
M
3
1 ?
CY.
*
O N?
?

U ? ~ + z ?n
ti
O
in

c; ?

0 '-
y,
? o

W °
I ti
O °
o ti

°
~o
c'? N O
W I O
a I 22
cO I 2 ? I

O ~
U ?
2 I
O K W
U = m I
2 cc?
0 0 „I In
2 ?
? _o U 0.
o? m?

W Y U
? ?
I

my??= m

Q ? y? W
Im
y

? o
ti
v v lD
+
?

• O

1 ?
\ U h
?
W
co >
I

I j
ti a
d
2
O ?
ti ?
Z
u I ?
m 0.

1 T
t i _J x_11 ?.
q:
1?1 J?"7,
is i 1{. y/ 1 ?I
V)
-LI1LO'1
Io
i
I?
8
C
nm ?
4
h?
?ff
H?

ti
C?
?v
h?
i?
c:

IN
- (n
O
O
1
? ? UI 0.
v I

O
Q U 0.
i
i? U• j ? -

i? 0 n
i+ Q N N ?
w I d c
a
YPASS SL^,7
TOI4016 _
a

N

z $
0

a ?
0.

=' ?
1
-
?
2
(3
I
n
U I ca I
Q
W I
I $
+ g
O
N
? +
N

N
W O
c g
2 0. Q N
Q I W
2 O
Q?

W i 0.0

0.

m

W

0.

? o

a

U

J

o +
ti a
j t
N
ad
h
ti
h
o $ U
U N
O h o
U

o 00
O .
[?'?1
U 0. lr
I ,,
e
^I

h

O
ti
I
/ E
,I
1
c?
N
UlQ
? o
0. 0. ?
0
O 0 0
O N

l Q

p
C '
ut o
v1 o
N
gz z

O O J 0
Ln 0
N
CL
owd -2

In -
Ln o cmi

CIT HEE-a f06Z7zwq Pro 0013HI,
(LLL .1 C aycf

4
a y r

y 0 ?

q? o
44ti
~
y eC

4 Z' y 4
?xi V .d ?i
h a?
N
Q
? ~s
? W
g
y a y

w w
d w
id
Lu. OCy
U ~ z
x h (/? ? Z
OO
N
$pq $C? M!?
0. • 0. ? t"1 b y
?y ? IIP?MVVV ` ? Q
N o {??77
/OC R' O A Fi 0
w Ww y ? ?'-
oc
V 0
y
O
n
a b N
0
N C
II II II
n
.r
h ? h
W ? W
U O ? p
?e
N M
co)
11?}}V??II tlj?`+M.Vr? Vy
w ? •?^j,1y1]
1.? ? ly
J
0
0

Q ¦
o
O o 0 o o S
C- M

Q
"I N to .Q to
II II II II II it o
o >
°
W

A o
0
N N ?
a a

CO)

U
w
uJ
z
W
J
W
CL
CL
ti?,•?n?c???ne,r???s??EZt ?

d
Z ?
?m
? ?z
G M <3
C Z?
z. L .
1/j rP
Ca ?..
a t C1 I- ?
a; C z?
Q1J49 49
C
o ?
z W VI
az
wo 'S O
z
? i
p?
J ?
N p rr
W
N N
Y ?, ?n?,l rhr
II
c
u-
r-
V
C
Q
Q
M
rr
Q
422222 W W ?q?• g ?Z-. ? icy c3
V ??? a0 ??QQ1??~O
W ? 6
w ? ?c3z4w1?„Rs
~ a
?' m W
Z
O

N
h

5'00 133143 33S
-7- OO+OZ d1S 3017 14JIVVn

C. N
\ J _ n
a rr
\ l =2
f ?
i
4- 4 c
r'
a
r
i

7srt+)JT4S sl aa9 n
o+oi •ws Icb errrr n ? ?,?
1
I?
_ ? Il ill
1.
1 .a 1 u ?
i ?
_ I Illl It t 1 I !. I a cr
1 I -: 1.1 4 ?_ ?`
`-, I 1 1 I I L j, ?.v
Z '-? ? 1-: j.I II f I a
IT-
1
tt r+ r v
? IL 1 I.-U T_
-1 ? ttt }•.Y •?` ? li 1 II J 11 r
oLL
I } 1? J 1
°? 1 I
r ?
5
m,
z
- J
1 =
f _ 3
1 MAR`'N ; c ; ;.
111 I III I 1 `?rl //
j1 1 I??? r
?' I I I II g?Y' :? 1\ c
r
„? I 1 a, 1l 4 yl 11
1
n
I II
1 I`I t • ?-\ Z

'-I??'Y09iI6C"\LII6f.^?EEDA6 ,8??`-9??\?
dUOZ 9f1V F.
AIiG 2002
yobs\1b59A033\ u3+11BAu3311b25.psh
1
L- 20
MATCH UNE STA.20 +? _
SEE SHEET N0.4 _ _---- I_ > - 4 -- la
,
?h \ 88m s ?I I ,r L2` z
k
?Qf'TYa8 ? I 8$ ?m9 ? I1II ??I I?. r ? 41?
"\ I I II Y y! I Ll
Ii
10, 30
o+ i
m D,nti,n o o ?' I? "•?
mmpa w?? + I I 8 ?
a z moo ?' m o-
A „Dpp 8$p I '',y ?'
Nn=D PO I 'il I y. ?
mAm
°o O m Fern)
X ? rl
IXnin I III - 70
7- v, n?o cimm u ? ; s ?.
?^ ANN Arr m m I m ,,.. }, ?,.
?? °c?r I r I. ? r
o ?aa I ? i I -
??. v+r m? I i.} r'? "q
?. 25
I
CID
On ? I I I I k C'? r ? r? m 11 I? ? I m t? .S f.
? v
u y 8 8 I Cs I a
w
I I
o ?? C I I ° z PTSfa.26?35J3
o s L3 I ?? a 18 ?j °o W
;TT[? 4 3 ? m v s
4fi F,. 8g o i ;i I r I 8g >J, s.
4 7 75' I m ;}
f+ I - F F 3 I ]
r
J?^4I I j ?. ? ? m
? ter" ? 1 i I ? ti3
A
PP. £C
??I" ?,?,? tis m I. I ,I I m ?}oO J mD n°D_ ' ??
fr-.f` 'I(1 ? ^^? `S I pw o ,+r, = + <' o m CO E ; n ??f ? _'? C
.?..: MI 2 8 -rn o<r r ? w i ?r
-zi
a+s• ?? 30 t33 \?,?i ?mnmi
h s? Wu ti. o -, ?? o
I 8 N 8 _ • ?u to v)
+ II
X00
C $ $ f 1 r,, 5 r _ " a o o - ?r _ = i 3 p ?- `/ `v3 `v' 4 \ \ u< Q fy
[? r I N n .'f -lN ,I l- '9 n \ T, Z , I O
z ?. II $ s?r,l N B59'16B*E ft
""?'.'r t v?ni ?r+ IS• ui't
a I ` I m y ?° z
? N
as

? ? N
NW
,OO
l` (.NCERIL'GE OR.
SR 3084 -Y
-

U b
?? +
Sy?
u,lin

a
\4 I . I i. rn J I ? can O :•Z gg
• ??; o+ ?I cull/ n1 A?? I n?zo ?!? ?? N? erg' C
n I o ^' c, r ^rtiq r7 g C? p CN
Ap rU4 A
Z P
,tea I
z
C z o
z M O 8 5' s F F f~; Y? ._\ \\ ?. \ f __ ?; Z m O \\ °' V Z 7 A •L7
MATCH LINE STA34+p0 -L- Z
SEE SHEET NO.6 n
N O
O z
Z w
LLJ
W
10
a
zz?
hhQ
NN?
Z
O
cn U?;1
C Z?
r?
dl S °`
a C Z -.
?o -Qv
?` C Jai
Z o
as aOEo
a Ii???OW?

I I WI
\ I I?
Z
ZON 133NS 33S
-7- 00+2bV1S 3Nn NJIM
SZti ? 1 ?Go i ? W >
J r ? _ _ Z
r I ? ( W
N m k I r.?._ c3 L3
? t4 _, C1 t3 ?1
? lo
• ? m.l __?a g ? C) ?' Q G3
I ;. W 8S__aS __ _
J ? I _? :I Ir I ??W
m w
I

k I p ?,?

w a
_ I ^ ? W i
O

a
? z w,

-,i Y O LL

_ _ LL r + Z ?1
? ? ? $$ - ? I k W _r?n I c??tn 0.?? p Ql
+ n° I ^ ez a5' 0 Fo
II II II 4 W
4
z .I. - --- -
.71
Lu+
cil
I a.
?? + + h m"r ?S{ a _ - 1H8'17bb1 'dtL h W I,
jt-
h WJ
I
=-
?. 1 J c? 'if7 J (mss d _ _ c? ? I it a -_ s -
r o
0 o n a
+? I
I ?? 1 N +zs?
63
it I g >^
w O ?' +h O a p> ? z °' a"?
W '? I ?-- Q: ? d D
I I Ili' t. I f S z +.? ?- ??a
CID
r I I I W ?__
I 1 O L
?I 2,n I // Aria
J ? r? x
N
u i ? I I ? p I _ o\ r' ,v
a ? w-
O pig
r WALL ? ,S[ ` S I, £
'13 'd
oy
o$
00 ' .rte I mo$
t p
+$ I II j ; 1 I W ?,? Ox.; f.?.,r 6?01N ')
w ICI I ?t ,_ s ; ???
Q G51 > t
C{ W i1L.
? O
S? ? ¢ t 1' [ 7 a O 3
'r:l g g t-W I T 4 I I
? dl ] Y I I ? L:
A-J
S'ON 13314S 33S
-7- 00+tEV1S 3Nn 1401VH
a
H

0
_N
-u- c?9c as
'YG 14snea3dd3d

8`ltib?l
y•,?'PUgIIE6"V911f£?vcEL3V6 ?9L3v=qo?:'
?00Z 911V £
mu ON
c z
? W z 'L.
Z 33
(n m
?? at Ol F?0?
?C _ LL
Q 9v ?3H3 33S
Z
i C? 09 z J o -7- 00+09b1S 3N/7 HQjq
d -14
z? w
? n
Z ? 0200;
Q7 _ Q 0200;
'olSOS J £ I+ ^ 1
y
.? ? ?.i 'ak..,nJ YO ??.•? Y
? ? 03 W p f? U3JN as",
a IQs
.7j L ?1? O w iII - I? II o _ w R? p4
low ?'? ? l .1 v ?FS ??.? II tl
?
* ? I t - 1' 14J .Fp a (r? (?
euNO _ 3u` ?W?IJN
c;P o?: I: I <?
s
SJ.
- - $ ???If.c• - K
.F? - ? Pi
C?k8
a ?:, a S?"'r1 ?Y _ ¢ r $ W ` 1 I' I f S"_u ??. I ? O tr)?v pp?? ?j 4
v > ?? - ?o ?1 ?? +'°^? _ I. i r lar J OZTI N?? II
t
FCZ9+L9 'alSSl -,a 4 Q W
3l 3 k u
00
? w
cep _?
?Y (? i ` t~? ,,??Ity I II I r` I
1
I _
emu:) i ' _ '-J ;m ? ,I ? lil ? III ?"' Oo ?I' ?.? NII II II 11
_-----?
?CI/I 1.-II? a1'CPL f?a Qa • ?io ti r I - III I ? ? _??i? c> ??JJ?
Na J>--^3.i3 I r7 ° N I i
I ? 1
? ? \? 'F,? nu _ _ _ a4,. z? t - _•? ??_, ? a- CF I SL ? . f ! C L.?' ???f ao,
yl I !
r gar
>Z ozo] 173.E5 w ?. p 1 I? ?f./?2? ??? ?'" M.FhOJ?_
O 4t, o ? S U ?o ? I W U41 ?;;m yU ?, ? pro °' ¢
?• \ "l. Y¢Fw- 1 1 li i. i Z I Z7i " r? Z ri e
f hX W 4., `i L
L4 oP lic
?P a ° z y, [? { a _ 'i 1' I I 1 ..r? "'1w I ? s r. ;
ltl is 'o rc o ? 1 3` f,I rY;fFr#
?o2yW ?zmm U? c ?t G I O ©w?, --I _ 0
?-
J
l? m a ?J ?e
II w ¢ ? 5 _ c'I? o
? 1v? ? ? II II II II II W , 2,. f ? ?? ?? I?? I? v'?m
N ?QOv{??? ?3 ? ? J I t? W '-a O
22 03° owlv
WW? ZDOp? QQ ao?°n?°' ?Q ic3r .? w I c5I`(I u911? I w o-a_ U4
(n II it II II II W J?UU C, o? t ?- I j? ?I. ?t I yLn?'.
W W ? W
V M
4 '?1

? l I? OI
b N
a, ,? ?
-FA- ;U// a5 J ` -?A- L69F aS
•oa 3Mn .c?ros ?,tt? ? oa arsla
h? ?I?
pp
C
I °
N
g
? ?a
W K W cD I I '?-• - ' I IJ ?
? - / Z JJ 'Y/ - I I Z
{Jai f
d
J10
HM - W 'H
Z N? SL 08 V..
09 U_ 3 Q ? ?
?rv
U
r 7 '.,? I 1 1 all O
W I I 2
? i ? I...
?;-
O way-^o <7 F ? tI l i I?'j I I. ?:=;??
+?
I ? I?? I I? ar
f I I•' •! , I W
i i1 I r
N ?` -4't I p fu i II,
?
N
I ? II
9TN 133HS 33S
-7- 00+16YIS 3Nn H0IM
zooz onv 4,

O Yn ^ z
r`
z
_ Z
Z o '
y
a? vi
o
W aC
o,' x
C1H
CZ?
'
ch P
'n
C
D
w

CIO Z
7 z V)-
Qzh

OZ ?O
W Q Eo
`U?
8
o« N
(kQ a
6'ON 133145 33S
-7- 00+Z1'V1S 3Nn H01M

a

I

-9A- lscz as ?
WO NOIDNI141801A

M N?
Q <
N
?V ??VJ J
1
1J N _
? ? ? ? "?`? I - ? ? ? ? ` ? I, •;?" Sall I ? ?is W' IId ? z
r 31
? ? ?i, p _ ? a:0 ? w ?? I ? L_?w ry_t? W r`•• "o? ? .; Ii I til? f 5,?, r ? ?? m
Q '
I ? -'CI ? _ ?3 ri O C f d U I? I W LW Xm H
?S
W?::- ?_J__? Cj __J•! :. 4 ,,. Icl I -+'..S .?iw e"' I ...I G' 3N?,
= 1? 1 7 ;? m+ cI k?- I a ,?
- - -- -_ f __- r- - - ?? L _ ?- ???i a o? ?' I III / v ?? ??'? ca ? UW ? ??3 „ c"????? _ ? v
Y6 S "u
8T 33 25
r
H _ 1r
wc1 ?? I?3 OL
rI n 2? X81 k 1 IYU s ?? ??
8 > ( «7 ? ,i' W I ?..
- ??r W h z +? /y 1 ?a
4 }} S'
w?i ?-
_f ool 4_? Q.--? ?? ti u °z:' E'1 y $ 7 I I ! . 1 a t.3J m
?_ F '. r ?? t 8 1 11 tit 11
.?a ,t$$808µ I I 1 ?L?:JJ
N W
wc, ¢ a-, 00 +?+$ ?.y rei3?i mid t` ?-`? `c:J Q?
OU L ¢ ` 7 '1 V w ? I c ? I ? O
RI z _ W .. p
.N p G. lQ`
61' I.iU I6 2e Q'O 3 3<
r
Z _ ?1 I
3 II
IY,
3 I O
w -- U -£ ??. 1? ,;'.eoye ?N ? ?? ??" s - ' I ?? v n '_ I h -? ( J ?• Zj??QL(1
> b w t,? -p
4 an 1:>' Mth ??
ZZ 11
3 '
{;? <?7 j,j LJ ta'tij -' I ii <a {.i f..,X ti M I8 m' f J tti - ;_ r n ?'n I q??
I
J?-- - _?, -- ?S 8522 E - - -,I ?W? ?s X040
I1I v ;
o d
'L(-? !? N q II II II
- _ ??7 ???-• ? 1?? `?? ? ?.i a?7 _?J w ?- ?b? ?_ 1? ? ? ??1 ? -:w _ Ltfa uc2'w
?? ? w ??,;? ti:+ ? ? o. z a -?, '?-' ? J, -?? I - ? ? ? P ?, 1 .?? ?« ? ,.? r, a•, r?. sn ?? `?.? ? u°.• ?,. ,J
¢ ?., m ?a 8?Cti1 oz ti L _ r: o
Z ? ? N I C.r t I.?.3 r.3 5. W i
Q -• ? ? - ? 8 - o r„ W ?¢ ? ctt`
! '? < Jill wzz
L ?o ."i I v ?ua?
ff J ?
i?-'_.----
:4 Z
O? -- 7„g S g7 47'51 E? W 3 j W
O ?' I I ^ ? f ?. ? I ?.:f (y.AHnO ,RIxR'--•? x ??-------?- ?? I . L?r
a c
- 65/6+69T4SIS H am 24 -? k
I n
2 r3 I Q: ILLJ
8 - o ?? I O ''ice
c 1y f?
?? III ?? q w +'$•a+? I ¢. I ° 1 i? n? -/ -w oo t? .3 ?iw
Lu -2
5; n-
co Mt'.:1
??? '"'3 `O? I' nwi/
1, v ?I 'I ?g ow ?.', r V ;? ?qt
la` 2 _ Q ^•C8 1 j f
N a o Y - I W Itj i `3 u ?.. J f W I ti:.?
=Z l c.,_tis w r r:.? ag.y. .-?. I? 1 m ?Ij ^of ` f"3-
n ({ 1,., i.r µt
N t. ¢ r l+°n I I ?, 't u l -p-
+ A
O OV ? I SO I I O??
651£+39
Z
0
h

U)?
O `YiL
po
pl O
?I8 ? J
P ?
},
-sA- boFF as ,
/
'3AV 31AVY-4
OI; N
c
N
oN
N N `
I
J W I N L I l ? b$ I ti
_J J
(I _ h r f
V.?
t
?s yQ ? ?• ??_ ,: ? 1 I ? W ? 30 ? ??

Az*
x- g 8 S 335 ti
?3N H01V1
j^ .. N
00+0 Is 3Nn
i
P

` N`
?
-bA- b06Z a'S
'a0 NYOOAMN3N$
o? ^Im
p
?N
P
N
J
N
N
974.E'1I
'a=?i'8a91IE£?Vfllt?i.°\E£41V6'=,,971A?'-io(?:c
NOU 91'V E;
Z
?b
=1 Irk

o
as
sn
CG
zy
?L
C Z??
I••r N
L '
C Z?"
C J?
W
aZiEll
01'ON 133HS 33S
-7- 00+.98'V1S 3N17 1401VU
G I '<z a8 Sg t ?I S .I I' k ?W
g o U '1 '?? z 2? ? W 8 g 3' y,JI 7 + S v
}
o u ; I ! II 1 T
7 ? ? a
?' ?? t,J 2.7LL f? ?? f7I. -?)©_ ?
?c• ccvc i "? `2 f ?#u?w1?0 1? -,J? -??.
o.? ?7 Y {
_ I ' I
? I ? I W
i
who

?
Y I I I

1
1
`

t::

D i_
q
? 'O o 11 II I

I N z

i -
W ; ?r 2 r
y
nr

-BA- ISFF 8S
•10 13n?v3o `l

O pN I
NN
1 Y a ?'' ??`__-- {;.?` • Ili III
1 °o o ?, 2 w t j ? LL? {.? ? ? I' I 1 u
too -?v -T
Q. . r e•' IV o,?
x„ ? X. ,?F-- °8 I li I
R V N L - C M1L , Y{ + I I Ili I ??1
? C 1 I1 _ ? t-? ? I w M ( I(?
// ?-?1?{
1 I L'. ra w
- - - lJ
a Z ? ?1 I , __ {o ,
T7 2; its y 0:151,
r
08 ? ? } I ° ? II-J u? I w I_ I a ? -,1
J ?/ J Y LI 3-- w I fy l i.J
-----------------
O
?- - ? r
----------- --
a'nx--- -.-
?2
W?h ,w`? ? J I OI ?
I?? ?? I I (,_ I I I I .( I ? <e w
Of
?--
WW?y
WW t??3 a '?---- I s
Si - -- tJ 1I
For
t J 'b•M1 I I _-- i J r1'1
(L ?: O I ti ?
°
L? o ^ ___ - I?_1J1 I ( I I a.r? ?7_ -• ? V t, - ?1
o - _ _ ? W f
ED NET
o ! i -
s f -? ? r l
< T
Its r
P ? l I .1 ? 4 W ? f,,

Q
h M
4 41
-LA- SLLF 85
S11 SJ31111
0 0
?? `Iw
N
pp pp
GK

? N
y'
h I y O mot
TO
Coons
r? I 1 1- ? Q °" ? ;, r
?3 W ( I I ? co" ' a `?' t c l ? I I ?',? r ;
r?aa'a5 .cw Sa''?` la T`- E 1 /
r y t?'? Ci? 1 1
I 2 - /
41
C W U S _
',+
<1s OOo? I rr .c,vr.
-I -? v I• -
z
3,. I ? --r- ?it T p
-Y7 84 084'E pa ,' I s
?- now?a
_
E .vc
I
N y?
?I 1 LL LL Li N N 7 '.
.
?COY
I O 3i 8?' I r` N ? ? 3, + 8 n?gag ?t ? Z ? I ?'-1
I a I ? U 5 1 Y" ^y oy 1 ? x?^' - fi
fly
J1
sg'g I J
o.
8'ON 133NS 33S
-7- 00+ZL'V1S 3N17 H,)1V19
4`'?'639PCE??flIIEE"\?EPA6594\
ZOJ?

€
oW ,ar C Z?
p
F C Z,"
M
// 'ON 13314S 33S
-7- 09f96'V1S 3017 1401M
r c I? I
z Q" s ?a CSC 7,3 w io I? m8 0
r
o i C J s3?vi+ ?vNOr ainv?o? `.•F n8- g 1T I r s O'.'b30-I3MN3V,-Iq GIVN'08 V I `i3
t
7'
W <
? N _ -^ + -- Cam,
Q Z Z9'f0
+86 'ol Sl :. J `I?
ms ? .'`.a i ( W I wg
0 E
? WgUH ???J ?x 88 8 s[ sea 1? g$
o ? <b
?'''''??g r >?? ,1 an ?•? JfY.-3•l US.L) ?^<,n-.. t..?ti m ?? ? a' :1^ 1 I ...Q? - }. ? 1
s ? a 5
u r" " a=vWo88u? h l ° 4 ? I w a e
4J f? '( 3? o u ?r m ?°a arc it
TOE w I, Ic°? ? ? a _ _
ws ",.u. 80 _ III I b-a _ _ n
uj
W m + •,n,- 301
54" „ 0 1 0
+,8888 8 1`°
?O II'h
m,?a I I = ? ? ?W y '? 4?
N! w (?
8 ?
22(n li' oiZ 1 ,0,8 ?\
?f G
vZivZi? 36
W W S If GI
_ \J
J
Go d
Lg?
Q?? ?'O. ^!?' ? VtW I ? F U ,?IJJ .)raj ?/?
ry ti
W'
I !Ij i? I? I ?'
? , {.'l Sr Syr
-IN
J
_ N y
O 1 tom`
;? $ ?g I a I - ?< f? ? F
m $ r - ?,, 0,88+o ILL .° ! I'I
Q Jw o m Ji .Im ` U Jli I K C
U II _ J W ?}
S.3 3 m n V? I :I r to ".iC,'E)`ty?
acs I ? ,'I V ;FI_ L.(
? ,,ff FI O (U. ,y /
wwo I I I ? I l - )} 1 r a r"
M mV10 W IU nl I 1 'S?c j / \ /
i ( )
- N ? 4 o LM- Si[ t ? LL ?J ?;
Ill
CL w„
-- -------------------
J r O '
_
U ? I
-------- --- - -
f
tiu I ro
r
a
1,78
i I
9
4
.b7-0-f zI -?.
tj 7,,
h

IO ?I? R N
N ,
-6A- Obf/ Ys
'3nV aO0MLS3d3
°I? N h

8 N J
N VVV
Y f?' 1 Iaa'nx ?7 ,2J $; tai
•. 1 ?, r? t,.7 w 2
¢ f tomt,,,, v' 1
ZN. P ? ? n II W ?? ? N F ? I Ql i I IV I I, ? I r.?,
1 w _ w
W? i??l ij w I - z'? Z JII -Ifr?? yJ?I'-i I? I I?-III ?J
f? I =
o? s ?m
6'ON 13314S 333
-7- 00+39'V1S 3Nr7 14O1VIV
a°'•rn?rf???curs^?Fee?F. ?sy;;
?.oz fir; ?z
mU--
d C Zro
_ V QIO rm
°rr b a t ej Z ?g
?y my?
xo Cj0 6+11Id1S3N3Nf373H?1dfY d Q__ olio
Z W (Jl -1- 1 }a G4 3p a LL a
Z?`? g Z;;a
w L'lee a. QEo
r a °y W Z u g m w? _ m sr m 42•
G 1 `? CC S r / I 8- a CSP 1DE w 8 o z
0 '166
O LL ?Il?d 4 ?.? +$ 8188 '?`? P14 .e mnu Q°? w + 0
al ? w A t - l_ - f o y a' ? - ?w oz;a ,nwoo .,?
1 ??r-:t .fy- g{ ?$0 11 ; ??I ? ? j?? Ov?i?tna¢Z c a?iJ ~`
a

-0/A- Oft NS
'3AV VXN33&,g
0

?
? ?pNp
t N
? I o$ F HZ O?10 J _ U
I w o _ 1 I I O? ( I ?m wa`?i
O \?iC4 ? f;i ?. z- o • 1 I 1 - o arna
oil C3" ZZ
N
WO
? u
Q?W r_ l-s. J 1 4, s 5
ti I= 7 C' m w J I 8 / €f'
03 zz!
? \ J? C:7 ?L I _ a C
f ONioQin
?`r O WW2 _ y
II ° II ° II W
l
?Q?JI?aN 2 2 i fr u+ ?z ?f ti, x O N?? II
\kp-1 II II II
? ? W W ril I a o I ??O 1 11 ? LG 'd 'f ? z a Q t ?? ? °„
,y
V'M ? ? a ? ? $-h ? ? 1 r \ g vr` ? OOt?N`
Q¢ 1 +n1 IIa N 2 ` c ' w I -
w fo. a
Lol '?1S15 a '- ° o _- fi al 3Nn ti z '? ' °
+. o I I. U r T a
4L?
u5?
l a ?r
t15 c:,' o ?t I? I.I ,. ?S+y I d \ \ y'?T `„ ,
LT,
.e O x4 go°?1 u F 'r 1 ?8 g,?W V\aA Gam'' r'.;?
I3?
65 ? ? +-r. ate, +m i c 8 ? ? AV
Os? " P
1? ) m "1 1U " I? G lI I +? _' $?a L111 a ?? z
d `?
Eli a ~? L? a 0 g o8 \ l oui O? ,`a +50
S .13+50
o i,r L `;: f: o n z - + o o'' ll ll cl'1r:>' !",o m
?o
w > t,1060101 'D{SSA s ?; w r 8? 4 + ° - x r_h, • 71
; _
58
5? - "L a s o r r I I nua cr 3o ssi
r _ E?. I O I • I ?il 1 c 36'.6 CAUL
? 1 I' I) I O z °f. ? 1
8 w $ r,°,' S s5 i_ h G1
t: ci-
}-? ~O oDn? i „=J , U +^ 1 ( I 1
z SQ f!:f,n Ft
? ? ?? `i iJ E.1 ?i ?? f.. ?h ,?m?•?r ?' ? I II(tt11I ?t? ?1,®?::?? f.'?i t.1? ? IL,ff?
W
?? :.1 CJ v0 V_ U00 0o? g 8 -J 1' Q ?' oo ',L, 1 1 ,:)
2 l i WW i.f O: To ,? W I 4V'O ? 1. l I-_ -? _
v L _ aw z^m n. L+ it + -
C9
s2 ?¢w
+ 2? ,.. Ooc. w¢LL I---JI f ? Iw 1 ?I< I 4 -S?'??f j?,i ?r' I©
¢ ` $ I p 0 Nc ?r
0
L-f
?r'a ?, I w I I? ? ? xt
00/
w Sy / _ `? n„ r r?
OSfg6 -NH S u,
zuuz onv cz
CnU? y ?? ?, 1 ?>
Z W wC_' Z='^rnv _) 1 `??i L I" III
2? 3 a L' r? \ 96/fi+bZ 'DISld_
6 ?fl C ?N O c?N??j?tr?tr,,c?n??? a ?` IQY\?
z z LLJ N Z ?I `Vph??N?
m t7 A r Z rv `??J / (Hill u II II Ir 1 ?// ? ?l ? ? a I I?I
H
o O z qEq. 40 Q. it,
t`'1 , Z c., o ilia Cr (?a Oil J, sy I
? ?N ate-?',? Qum I •? - "i?'? O N
'd marn ?,
"aa z4Z41
W$2 ?
r
215, w? Him,
/• L b) J J ? w ? w
i
y ? ?'? ' nt ? ? 08 3 ? ? ll ll ll Il Il pW
a?z os It I s' Lot
rrl zrz-? m>+^ \ ? '°°u I N I .°ngg"S ?V'????p -.-. p? bra ? o ?°
• ?? ??{ O??-, JN 1 ? m ?tOE $m? •?\\` \$V'??lC?h?. ° '? o ??\` ? yr•; o - / ? -r
f?NNO m°v N?re o$$ ? ? 'g /N __? btD ll Il J S 1 Q -' O?'.// 2 c8x8
J ?? ?Y ?rw-u ;a +•°oa co o y
lids 4 - V) l) II II II 4 ? o? p'j? Gp 'Qfj'?. Z$Y?7 u4
ccpp Q r LL I ?• O <m OW mr r3 H I
s? NO?q?? a? a w G I o. ?^a ,-''s ?
pnll6?"+-? xJ '^¢? IPO? >• m15• a / 5' ? i•`. - \-,'\uou i? u? •:?? ? LL+W °o
N II II II ll w¢G. 129•,C: = .l ?. i + ?`'^i ,. ?" ??'?? n u° $ 8, v// S ° r6 $
IV,
HIS
° _ i ?? at# 8? 4 E - r m °30 n s ?/ /r zo??
? N `? r O WALL
?? H'I? W \ <? ?+?iy ,6 ? j (J 'Ij`• w T? r 9 ? ??.? ° o "1 r? / / ` % eb u 8 ? o?
? O? * ?8a '??? ? ? •S ? ? i ? !l$. .??? m ?{{? ? is r -0?8 ? yb2"6 / ? ?'g'?°N
MNcup
I Alp
II '? w +.°oo Nr.p6 r { ; ?` /? W pWY - ?m F' +0 88 ,n FF ?r mJ ??n
" W $? N .+ N - t r \ ' ^ N ° - J? n a I m /4 f 8 06 +
Q 8 awunnax
`+ QHlJu3 ? tip: ? ?, ? r A KWN ¢W
OO
MOO
r o. > ?PpE _ .SC;. _. (? -9 y mow / / ?---
0 1 ^? ? Nau 4 t? H I \w _ ? ? i L N + a ? '/ o / fi g JVwi°oWaLL
hi n 1
J
h 't o u?
-'t d VlpQ
dad
/? o 0•8a 8- .??`? /`^ ? ?, o m \??gI w ? <'-8 ?8 0 8? 8 + • ( ?' 43/ `? o
w 16 moo II p ,r+ $ m FO. ?Y _ c?' _ I °o T! Oft _ f + ^ / / / (V "' ° _ o
Q. W Cplp / ur? a 3 -" ?. \ r Y„^ • J?
l ? 0. ? LL ( ZI o3a o88 g W{,\? •f" ry I'' -ti \ p`? ` x s //` 3?e ,o. ?N ?? 3
xd r a am5,. ` r v 8I'
4g\ `>2? /' ? x.88 6•.
_ 1 I\
l l o O? T f WfY lei ? Lc, I W _I a ?? ?frJO? (?Ji ip ?>.
N 0p Ap am" ro y ??+611'DISOS I z I 8 tu' by u / 1 i i I ?i g'0 \\
01 2 moo. _
N?Na yg- /% ?a o' I _ u Ell 222\
`I,; ?? JN\? \\e'v 1pp ? O ?< m m I Wp ? ' / ??e ? ?? 000`\
?W?? \K "__!`J' \U I +<POO YNRi? / ? //\\? / ~ `w lU°/f
wwwWW ?. 0 r-,? I ? / f. mr, Z
_ ? a wa
W W W O r ?ii'cll 0 °I°s? +SW \ [ \ ^+? i% / f ° { /W o o$ cNO i?¢u4 0 ?w
W W W ^ H?, \ a Jt. \ / / $ u '1 oaaym Ozz
I ¢ 'I ? ? \ c r \ ....., / ? / +Ig ?.+OZ ,`? tLLLa? tea.
` arc, "I ? m ? {{ ?WU ¢wmr-+•, aE
i
ti ? ? W J??" ?4: ?.y H•i,Y <•_ / I °8 ?dr°o6 °x
x!: W F UNU / 't 'O _ Q j 6 "b x K? Z
MO l
•I Jw' ?.?' I?N ?.9X „ ?. - r I H?4,?, _ / ? w3 LL..m',,:t _
Kr I w a¢
} Lr? ? •l / i ? ? ?? m /S/ / v 8 a „
oa ???__L m?w w¢LL \M
/ ? MW a" ? ? o.y I W 88 ??+7 r? m m `o?. \ ?, ?? j/ /? sx iil '? ?.? ci ? ?Q1
3g7R4NS?IONN ?' {? ?? ? 7C? I3 ? o 'n, A P?• ?'CP ??/ m? SAO{S ?u f.J ..i
I
' -N 77' 019'ER ? , • -
Im
LJ ? U ?r
- -? C y ? \S/NdJ
( N p
l y? ._ 't 1. cn c\ ?? ° ( vi ?? ? C i ?' ? ?Y, ro i w \ 3 • ' ? "c -=-a?.i
?'?--?'? z t? ? t? I? ?' 3 ? sl i > 5 + " l 1 t /n• Y, ?? ? ti,- x
1 !; i 1? + NOILSMk11.Sl1 _ I i .. `? W I r"?i °o ? ??S7 ? ?? .-L I IJ ? ?'
? IrIIQ N
I I O
t
? I? I ?+I S F_
W

I II ?
Z
W
tir
d ' i W
?

.L til 15 ? W

r ?l
z

i
;
I Q
I
I
I-
? I
N ? w
N

F_j
R I 3
4? iv V+ S ioo 8 1 p $?m A m I???r
+? nP 1 °? ' ' ?i ? b• f I Vt? 1 ??+n ?odo???-'-+.'? 9•w u ? °`°r, !-°_
¢ - '71 ,t 1 ?? -1 ??i o ? +?
VA
z :v
i? o._a .- AST
.? TO
z ;.
s,.? h 7,ud 3+- Ol °o? ° ? ? p z3awJ>- - ? ? A
5?
r U W ? ? -- - ? ? ,S aS ? g a arN
?css:'w ? :? x • ? o J ? ° '
W ? 9 i,,; ti •} ?`, 1 I ?? I W oY+?$ w¢?.?vwi°o _ ? ?. ? ??t5 /
m , M,I $ R g?' V
Q? o d °
U OO ' 1^I ? ? ' •° -.: r;°o ? 3 I'. 13 ?. ^.,??-? .. Ir-:'?' w. ,.? -J ?Ay _ N d?
?' n i NOJ no
(310
r,? a ? ? Q ?Ni9
W • sit s ?? ? 9Z5C as VNN
cl W Imo'; nr ??. t?_E8?-8$ '~ I tl ?1 I _ 1 -i f t o- r,.Ji `?? biro
?. 1 'pis o +'o^ +•u1W I i?'?e' W~ ??"'?? w`. `r F?,/ N ??
?, ? ?'i. _ f ° .? ?J f ? ?1 ? ,,, ??,., ` _ ? I ? -is ? •I. ?i1 + ??? II ? Q ? ?, / l?? ? ? N ? C

O mom
1 1 IJ ? I ? '?g?n I I" - W ..
+
°
I
?
1 f-` ^
=`
J ? C. Y'Y

srtlor+
r/ • ?
39A' E" loar
`,
l
I r
4?"
?
°
?
?
7f 2g
N
E
/ ?
? \ I
8?
1 In i .?
f
:
i? 1 V W ti S i

a _
I
y
"? Y
3
? ? yi9
NOl
t ? ? ; ,? _ - ? t
' Mti x? o0 ov
?
oo•os b ? 3N
(1
111'V
my DooU ,i- oL+-o'o + 3 33S
00'S9+
3 NS
/+
° -?_ 00+
II'ON 1
O / oo
9 00 0
zc?ua
?U?o
o
Z N? y C H=N M? ZC?Bt LEI 'DISSO ?fy' ?- ? Li?T ?
/
rs LL nLL
Q O O \ a' 8
? J 'a
? n+
a/ r/e

N 34 { +!2
1 PbE-
?
g g 4
?
? v?
?mJV?
.
m
n ,.
? z
""o OE u
a
ds
TDE
WpE
J o
r
?
Z z
W o
.3
?
1?-i ?
W
Q?
? r
+ /-Wn U?U
o

O 3
lj ul GI V.?
I? OI
I
I R
??v ??
O
•
( p
?i O88
M W° Nam
J
Nn W.:
? I''
?L J 1?Q
?O
KI _¦
4? H `?
N mN0 ~¢W
???yyy Nab
.

II I?
w¢w 8
i?
N /
';
a
II
W
?I
Q- QO?Ihcl_-?n +n

(? ?I
W I
W Rp
?F,a `'
W
In
??j Ll II II II II
, hV? y'F/
?mJJ? I
S I
8$
? +.p W I
c Z
Q- '
I?
?
J
a ?
,
? O

L J LL x
N ;.
zz

W

U
a N a
N
<
00 z
ina?
lb
O
J,
{7o' S W W Y J 96 Z9tF£l 'ajSOS
`j
` ?O ???
Q ? OO?LL }w
.. ?¢
J 1
V a H
W

E° b

n (?MM ?0 8 8
d

\ 4 ?l
I 00118F/ blS?ys ??s
_ ?Nn tiJlb`y
= m

9F W * 8

`V 80 x'88 ? v
4
I z a

I
Ll - ?d i•\

1 I I ?` ~C ? "?y? C .S

?T c23 • t ?? l 1
`? lJ
m r ? u

I }?
W ?

-1 -
?

T
a

o
o
O ? _ ter:

¢
?
W 8 Q
O.n
+ n , O

Q
¢
2
\?\ yd ? ?"g ? O ng
• t\ 2 Vv'? S + YOi :it + N
A' "?„ \? ° ' . \ " 86'ZLt/£/ 'olSSl o S L° `? h
Or ?. ~l? ? rlp ?? yf ' S'z O
Z oipa00/ ?, v \ n8On s?( I b?l?W? 'J \
Y T p 4 \
+ 50,LS S N
a og> s9s O,f?'r 8? 8-- v.` 2 ' +4 0 ''.tt? r?-? \-
p r ' RJR 7? ?. .
I? 2? ?s?7 s + LL _
wit ?1 ll 'r ` 7 T i? m0
ry?p - sEL£'tLZI 'o/Sls
t'll j0 4- ,v 4.,? ? I I p1 -tit t v' ) _ f,? E , I CO
I c ^ I J 9? ?? 1 ?? r Ot C
°?. ??? z ra ? v1
c
N -?
R
(VN?EgO \ Q¢.. • 1, Sg a ( _+?4.i r? f ?Q?vl??
r w N (f y
In II II II 11 II o ¢' '?. ? ,? a - '?`.? ?\ ? ? .? f 13 t 7 3 ? r '''' r3
4"0
+$ ? d w
55691521 'o{SS0 - ? , ' $ ° •. z \\
ply "
J w ?? I w ?
.?.. 08 t, ? 08 o/? ?
q W ?? -1 U I I ? C h
h / Ina ?./ g
_--
J w /.,\ \\ t,. ?m s"? =Z?;
H
+S ?? 3? 80 Qp ti " v V?`?
.L7?//S /' <QC? % I
-7- 001bZ/VU 3NR PojV y
-
;-h-,' ll
Is'?'k?19Iis4?m.i3ilEEl'\?E©Ar_,S?L\sqo. A:,
ZOOZ Of1J F?

O
?
'z
z C Zrvo
•L "
j
a
C1
_
N o U
?
CZ,
a
ci ?o tn^J
o Z
z? `•
WN
m
?, ow -
a° Q Z 0
`0? s
o?
?z
o f W W g
W mqv
6 q
(' ??
O
. '
w-
?I?t'
SS0
'

w
Q' 'o}
9g8pPISI
o
p
r
u
L J, c/, `3'tQ
u;, O

.03N 5NnSN?ld`N
'ON

a ? e Q z T
a

? os
?
' a '= W
600'TRANSlTl01V (SHIFT) 0
?
A
r wr w .: oo vON _.. r E-?E u?

-- - NY -- - - - - _ _
o- o

W N
U
M
;
v
i ? N 7f 12' 00.3' E
V PAVED S
-
'
- HLUR: -
_
_ -.---- --- - I.* 330'FULL STORAGE ?I e ?-
- ?
- -_
-
--
-
u?
ar Lea
m 111

- -
._, ?? -

-Yl41VBL- -?

::, » F r ?
-
$

l KM N 72' 20'4.9.9 E

4'P 1

--
-33D'FUQ STOF ??
W,E -r
-
_ - :
- =
- - /R-

d

?j

. -
-

SI I
,>' is corl

?h• C?
AV
_ - EO SH
-$ ?
- > ..
,.•?. A
,3noh3a
U h ---•I -
- -
2'-£C8

-
r »r_o
•.,,
- °a

I ?\

r
W •-- v
2 d ?.Sa m ti\t.J-ED '1 r I 1 I,
I d I •_ S
g3:s? w? sg ```` `x?•?' ss
?a;ono-0 N .g ?? r ?????}}yyI I, a II p? c
An =j
I ^ ? F; vl W¢LL o? +n +n?
2 4 Y i;? W • U +
47 I s? m f +
773 -7-71
V
J
?n w mua
aJi,o
Q 3 U U 3L
WWW WW ?
.i
I W Q. I L?>'
J I I f.,? J "-
I JJW I ! r°s .Z
W JI i • N ?`1 i Ii1
1?z U_
222 4V"t;r,i,I(
Q
J' C
.ctrl .i,? C
1 ?
L
+li
06l ,:r , F;y Il
{
z
>a 3
J (.
4 N ??
W ?, 3
Z
/ ' J1
O ma
W
111
{, Sg o -?., r ? s \
b W ? u 1 .
:3 OS+ (. 1
u
Z
J
o? , O
auii
N
n
O U
°I
t? N
? II II II II
H
f?IC16 17
d?to"??m p
h II II II p II W
?QO?h?ln

?W

o CO O` ? I
? g..
?i ti p
N O •
z
? J
I
of M , y
r
"

v) J U
z
m
i VI W?,

I
'
l
•,
t
l ? - ?
z
.
1 ? d ?-
I IY3N
6' ° n 11; t 440' FULL STORAGE' lxPJ
- _ _ ?? S UGNO.CONC.ISL - ---- W
v ?'m ?? -Y14NBL- W vZi
I.• rest N 72'20'45.9E j W
i) ??-'- LZ ?« a a SHLDR.`? Q
, a4 is E-ti
(
U , z z
?? P r "/ - w< ,soles ?+? ?+a W ; 3gs ,
U \I+'? ou?i+„
N ? \
a o$+?
+
S b $ 4 -
qcL
:f • • "' 8 o In m
-.s_ c U + PiW I ,.. owe,
C? - aH o
_4_ f
7 ski;, F y -•= O O,vv
k
m> F
PD?; A, Jvl I In
A, UOV I
_ _ I
SI S 30 , ou N?¢
.SI m W app EgS aau °aa
8gd {?S mON 'n
I r-
I im$ KWW ylaJ I
mNo WKLL 1
sz
? I
09+

d hl /
3 I w
s z sa

I W gs
I +n
I
I
I
,?0

.SI W
m lI
u o
I W8p
+
+
N

v I
W I J IN
I 0 W
I .C 0 ?
W I O
3 4 1 ? v
I ,sl a ea 8
I ?o +$
I "A
UPON 133HS 33S
-7- 00+8£'11/15 3Nn H,)IVH

ro;

O ? v??j
D pp
N
?
?
Q
rd- !a Sn -ru- roe Sn
0alaao33va •0l 080.13va

M
g
glQ
c
m

tiff I ,
°?
a I ?M
N

?.? 2d P
'_
T ' T P
p ,
":
art qLL
°
I
U
~
I-
?
111 I
I J?
<
«
{- m
N
.
I I m `
.
??
? W
o Y LL 4 . P
.
4
N :
^.

r' m
'
i S ] J

70*

i 1
U
Z

I I
I I w
Jv
0
O °
I I ~ v
.?
I 3
r
N
'L
V'LJ I
J ?, I
O > I
2
J ., I
Sh:(
tW
s/?
r,? II
I
1?W I
IJ I
I
I
I
`.'s'?'bI^lii "\?illE?^\£COA6, +.?V'
`1f1J 5FIV '
LOOZ 5d

Buz;

I?
Q
om'
z ?I z VH O
•iL- ~Zm
S <Z
S
w .
ila
ay G CLI V)`5q
? f-

LL
a ;?
1~ U C Z„
cn

m ? J az
V%

oZ
wg u
?
t zz a Ii i

W
U

?Q- 4J
I Z

I Ij 3=:

-
z0
-
J I me

ql N N
Z?h
Z \
Z

? O a;z ? I
0A
lz N
N
h
091
r
Jj J
\ ? =I J
JJ/ ? ?q
V
N
Z
w J ''
p W ii
H ? hr
O ~
pW.
Q
LLr:
„1 n
?
N R
Y o
ti
N T
? ?'-

o vJ ''
a
Uu,
a >

J.r O

I
I
h
4
C
z

p:n
U? ?

rZ
z
i
J
Y :JF

PPON 13311S 33,-
-7- 00+ZSlV1S 3Nn 14J-LVH
,-
i_TA
I L

I
0

:ill L- p7

r A
l (?
l

it I

?
LL
w•^.
oe?
0
I
-r-
4'd•S[9AC£°\3I[££^x££47V6S?G?\s?io4'b??c
zooa ony sz
Z
C J Z
?W
$ z
m z
G z
g o ?3
oo?
?Q?ZZ
J J
mmcoW
I II
N?VNj
2 2 2 a
WWWW
Q
N N
z
O
O
C ZN

gm N
a?

•
w?;
p
a
C(+`' C Jai ? qq??
c
Q
N cweuO ?[? w?',
`
z W uj?

l 0
C
z
a
W S 7 u g
?. U?? 4

' ?

N 7 w
a IQ C
o?
IN
I
D z _I Z z-p .}' 3
_i
BOO ? I
8

m

y
$

n 3

N N
l $.".,, Y

r J{I? I
. 8 1
O

+
+
-
l SO0• EOP TRM'S?!0 _
;'
3 --- 1 3

? .. N-32.20-45D

' A5
C ICL
? b '0 5
N0N0. _??
CY7w

LU
CO
p ?W
0'
2* 20' 45 E
V

-i
-- i?
u- -
E
-Z--- Fn %- -
s-??sr -'-

-_V - ?_
J ?.
lI; ?: rs I
a' \ -Q 4J I VI S.Jy'
IJ = m
? '? ? 1 i ?$Tga<m a,^
,e rtw o
wU i 6 - + u? ? W fY l?. ?
I/l` rw w 4 ? O ° F`
i
=J ti
f. col"
4PAVED
CS SHLOR.
;ro
a-vf, BL-
!^ 1 x >;r ? z
R

m.oi
?n.so
b a

o I
W
?
?
???
I ~
?
? I
I m
aw
LJ

?
Q LLj
c LL
I
N
41

L II

Q Z3
t?.

a
c
J
z

11 U)
Z I
r 1 1 >-
J ~
?Z m N
b O
?
log W
I
- ?

os N N /L vLr 45.V t
E---?-- ?--?-?-E uJ E
? ti1 ? ? I F ?
Z ,.i
V- I
vi I? Z; I G N j ;? J '? N!? ? I I) ?'i I %Il ¢ ? ¢' I +I'? o
i , I J aocQi
ai?°I? ¢°uar II i¢? ? - ?'1.1' s•Z`?J ?I j??)?1 ?4
m on. 1
aQW qIJ: ,
-j
J
O` 1 6'
I,r- J V1
U ? o JrV ??
V L V z
?? -? O I o#a ? r
_ Z N N?? 9
t rte, U Nam W 600'TRANSITI0N (SHIFT)
-4N r,-• W >- wWv -
i,P
-Yl4SBL- N 7Z20'45,9 E N 71 12 00 3' E
- ------ --- u--- V)
-- -- - - - -- -- - - - - - 4NB - N 72' 20' 45A' E ----,1 -- „I z `n
:r c_ 1 W
J
-- -
l
ti'T.:?-,
? w w
?? oax
aN I I? •? al~ir amp
t
?I ? jam?
u ?
2-ZV Qm-
f? _-_ 1 ?J G. 33VC? 4t. Z
<? 1 ?: I >. I W ] Off[' a
t <. I I 'r a?=1L
65
I
3, -
3C
J. i.
E S' gib'
C?C17 ?j(ly £
WHrFR
QG
Micnaei t•. Easiey, Governor
William Q. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Colson H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 7, 2004
Cumberland County
DWQ Project No. 040694
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in
0.19 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, 56 linear feet of streams, and 0.01 acres of other surface waters. The project
purpose is the widening and improving SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from the proposed Hope Mills Bypass to US 401
(Raeford Road) in Cumberland County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated
Aspril 20, 2004 (received April 27, 2004). After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits
before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge
and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) All stormwater runoff shall be directed to sheetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive velocities, unless
approved otherwise by this certification.
3.) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers.
4.) Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
5.) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be
restored to natural geomorphic conditions.

N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
WAIF Michael F. Easley, Governor
Q 9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
?O? pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
6.) Any riprap used must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow
conditions.
7.) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
8.) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is prohibited.
9.) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary as well as along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing for the areas that
have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities.
10.) Two copies of the final construction drawings shall be furnished to NCDWQ prior to the pre-construction
meeting. Written verification shall be provided that the final construction drawings comply with the attached
permit drawings contained in the application dated April 20, 2004.
11.) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division
Engineer and the on-site project manager.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Since 1 ,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\TIP U-3311\wqc\040694 wqc.doc
1W
J

3Y d?RA?Q?,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
April 20, 2004
WETIANgS 1401 GROUP
?pR `Ia ? 7014
WATER QUALITY SECTION

Subject: Nationwide Permit 14 Application and Section 401 Water Quality Certification
Application for the proposed widening and relocation of SR 1141 (Bingham
Drive) from the proposed Hope Mills Bypass to US 401 (Raeford Road) in
Cumberland County, near Fayetteville, North Carolina. Federal Project No. STP-
1141 (7), State Project No. 8.2442901, TIP No. U-331113, $200.00 Debit work
order 8.2442901, WBS Element 34917.3.3.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from the proposed Hope Mills Bypass to US 401
(Raeford Road) including a new section on new location between SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive)
and US 401. The length of the proposed Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) project U-
3311 B is approximately 2.8 miles. The proposed design for SR 1141 from the Hope Mills
Bypass to just North of US 401 consists of both widening the existing roadway and construction
on new location. The typical roadway shall provide a section of 4-lane divided curb and gutter
with a raised 17.5-foot median, and a section of 5-lane undivided curb and gutter section as
shown on the NCDOT Right-of-Way plans. There will be several intersections along the
roadway and a proposed bridge over an unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek. The proposed
project construction scheme for U-3311 B maintains traffic on-site during construction. Traffic is
proposed to shift between the existing pattern and various Y-lines included in this project
depending on the phase of construction. This project is a Design Build project with a production
schedule LET date of June 15, 2004.
TIP U-3311 B is one of two sections (Sections A and B) of TIP U-3311 which was split after
completion of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). TIP U-3311 Section A involved
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
WEBSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG

TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
FAX: [phone] CAPITAL BLVD
PLB SUITE 168
RALEIGH NC 27604
t.
the realignment of SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) with SR 3697, and was let to construction in
June 2002.
TIP U-3311 Section B (U-3311B) lies in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in
Cumberland County in the Cape Fear River Basin (Hydrologic Catalog Unit 03030004, Subbasin
03-06-15). Work is scheduled to commence in June 2004. The application package consists of
this cover letter, a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form, 8 '/2 x 11-inch permit
drawings, 11 x 17-inch half size plan sheets, interagency meeting minutes, and a North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
request letter.
Summary of Impacts: Jurisdictional impacts under the Clean Water Act (CWA) due the
proposed project include the following:
• 0.19 acre of permanent impacts to riverine wetlands (fill and mechanized clearing).
• 56 linear feet of permanent impacts to perennial stream
• 0.01 acre fill in surface waters
• No temporary impacts
Detailed descriptions of jurisdictional area impacts are presented in the Jurisdictional Status
section of this cover letter and in Table 1.
Summary of Mitigation: NCDOT has designed this project to avoid and minimize impacts to
jurisdictional areas to the greatest extent practicable. Detailed descriptions of these actions are
presented in the Mitigation Options section of this cover letter. Compensatory mitigation for the
remaining impacts includes the following (see attached EEP request letter).
• 0.19 acre of impacts to riverine wetlands will be compensated for by EEP
• 56 linear feet of stream impacts will not require compensatory mitigation
• 0.01 acre fill in surface waters will not require compensatory mitigation
DESIGN BUILD COMMITMENTS
The design of the project is final in those areas under jurisdiction of the CWA. The NCDOT
hereby commits to ensuring, to the greatest extent possible, that the footprint of impacts within
jurisdictional areas will not be changed during the design build effort.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
An Environmental Assessment (EA) was submitted by the NCDOT in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The EA for U-3311 was approved by the NCDOT
Division of Highways and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on April 27, 2000. The
FONSI was approved and signed by the NCDOT on October 25, 2001 and by FHWA on October
29, 2001. After the documents were approved they were circulated to federal, state, and local
agencies. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
2
a
U-3311 B is in compliance with 23 CFR Part 771.111(f) which lists the FI1WA characteristics of
independent utility of a project including the following.
1. The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental
matters on a broad scope.
2. The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation
improvements are made in the area.
3. The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable
transportation improvements.
JURISDICTIONAL STATUS
Delineations: Jurisdictional areas within the project area were delineated by NCDOT in 1998.
Wetland determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria prescribed in the 1987 U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987).
Jurisdictional area delineations were verified on January 26, 1998 by David Timpy of the ACE.
Because the delineations were verified in 1998, the ACE requested that the delineation be
revisited by the NCDOT prior to permit issuance. On March 30, 2004, NCDOT revisited the site
and found no change in the existing delineation. A letter requesting Jurisdictional Determination
renewal was submitted to the ACE on April 15, 2004.
Jurisdictional Impacts: Two jurisdictional sites occur within the project area for U-331113.
Impacts at Site 1 consist of 0.19 acre of permanent impacts to riverine wetlands, 56 linear feet of
permanent stream impacts and 0.01 acre fill in surface waters. Impacts at Site 2 have been
avoided by bridging the system. There are no temporary impacts associated with this project.
Detailed descriptions of impacted areas can be found in the EA. The following table summarizes
this information.
Table 1. Jurisdictional Impacts for U-331 1B
Permanent Riverine Stream Impacts Natural Channel

Site
Wetland Impacts Stream Impacts Requiring
Design
(acres)* (linear feet) Mitigation (linear feet)
linear feet
1 0.19 56 0 0
2 0 0 0 0
Total 0.19 56 0 0
* -- Includes fill and mechanized clearing.
Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts: Proposed jurisdictional wetland impacts consist of 0.19 acre of
permanent impacts to riverine wetlands within Site 1 (Sheet 4 of 9 of the permit drawings)
resulting from the road widening. Of the impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, 0.12 acre of impact
results from fill and 0.07 acre of impact results from mechanized clearing. The wetland at Site 1
is an alluvial swamp located along the braided system of the unnamed tributary (UT) to Beaver
Creek. Wetland impacts will be avoided at Site 2 by bridging the wetland and stream system
3
(Sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings). The following table summarizes information for the
wetland impact site associated with U-3311 B.
Table 2. Jurisdictional Wetland Information for U-331 1B
Cowardin Community Impact Type Total Impact
Site Classification* Name (acres)** acres
1 PFO 1 H Alluvial Swam F 0.12), M (0.07) 0.19
*--1'=palustrine; FO=forested; l=broad-leaved deciduous; H=permanently flooded
**--F=fill; Wmechanized clearing (method 111)
Jurisdictional Stream Impacts: Proposed jurisdictional stream impacts consist of 56 linear feet of
perennial stream impact within Site I (Sheet 4 of 9 of permit drawings) to a UT to Beaver Creek.
The impacts will result from the proposed extension of the existing 72-inch pipe to accommodate
the road widening. The existing pipe will be extended on each side of the road. The UT to
Beaver Creek is a braided system approximately 100.0 feet wide and 0.5 foot deep. Impacts to
the UT to Beaver Creek at Site 2 (Sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings) have been avoided by
proposing to bridge the wetland and stream system. The following table summarizes information
for the stream impact site associated with U-3311B.
Table 3. Jurisdictional Stream Information for U-331 1B
Site Station Structure Stream DWQ Index Impact Mitigation
No. No./ (linear feet) Required
Classification linear feet
1 17+00 to Extend UT to Beaver 18-31-24-5/ 56 0
21+00- 72" CMP Creek Class C
Y12- I
Water Quality Information: Unnamed tributaries receive the same classification as the streams to
which they flow. Beaver Creek (DWQ Stream Index Number 18-31-24-5) has a best usage
classification of C, denoting that appropriate uses include aquatic life propagation and survival,
fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture (secondary recreation refers to human
body contact with waters on an infrequent or incidental basis). Beaver Creek has not been given
a use support rating by the DWQ.
No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-11), or
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) are located within 1.0 mile of the project area.
Beaver Creek and its tributaries are not listed in any section of the North Carolina 2002 Section
303(d) list.
BRIDGE DESIGN (SITE 2)
The bridge at Site 2 (Sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings) will be a cored slab bridge with top-
down construction, totaling 200 feet in length and 90 feet in width. The bridge will consist of
4
five spans with lengths of 40 feet, 50 feet, 35 feet, 35 feet, and 40 feet. The spill through slopes
will consist of Class II rip rap with filter fabric.
FEMA COMPLIANCE
Cumberland County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. The
crossing of the UT to Beaver Creek is in a designated flood hazard zone and is included in a
detailed flood study, with an established floodway and corresponding regulatory water surface
elevations. According to the Hydraulics Design Unit of NCDOT, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year water surface elevation is matched by the proposed
design.
UTILITY IMPACTS
According to the NCDOT, all potential utility impacts have been addressed and no utility impacts
and/or relocations will result in additional impacts to jurisdictional areas.
ICE STUDY
An Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) study is not proposed for this project due to the low
probability of indirect and cumulative effects.
WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS
The project will not impact any Designated Wild and Scenic Rivers or any rivers included in the
list of study rivers (Public Law 90-542, as amended).
PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with a federal classification of Endangered (E) or Threatened (T) are
protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended. As of February 11, 2003, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists
seven federally protected species for Cumberland County (Table 4). Species characteristics,
distribution, and habitat details, along with survey and biological conclusion information were
reported in the previously referenced EA. Surveys for species with habitat within the project area
(Michaux's sumac [Rhus michauxii], pondberry [Lindera melissifolia], and rough-leaved
loosestrife [Lysimachia asperulaefolia]) were conducted in 1998 and received Biological
Conclusions of "No Effect". In March 2004, the project area was re-surveyed for habitat and/or
populations of Michaux's sumac, rough-leaved loosestrife, and pondberry. The EA includes
information for small whorled pogonia; however, small whorled pogonia is no longer listed on
5
the most current FWS Cumberland County listing (February 11, 2003) and therefore no surveys
for small whorled pogonia or its habitat were conducted during the March 2004 surveys. No
listed Threatened or Endangered species were found during the March 2004 surveys. Habitat for
rough-leaved loosestrife is no longer present within the project area due to the natural succession
of previously maintained/disturbed wet ecotones. The NCDOT concludes that the proposed
project will have "No Effect" on red-cockaded woodpecker, rough-leaved loosestrife, St. Francis
satyr, or the American chaffseed. Michaux's sumac and pondberry received a determination of
"May Effect. Not Likely to Adversely Affect" (Table 4). A letter requesting Biological
Concurrence was submitted to the FWS on April 14, 2004.
Tahle 4- Federally Protected Snecies for Cumberland Countv (Fehruarv 11. 2003 list)
Scientific Name Common Name Status* Habitat Biological Conclusion
Alligator mississi iensis American alligator T S/A) N/A N/A
May Effect, Not Likely
Lindera melissifolia Pondberry E Yes to Adverse) Affect
Lysimachia Rough-leaved E No No Effect
as erulae olia loosestrife
Neonympha mitchellii '
Saint Francis
satyr E No No Effect
anti sci
Red-cockaded
Picoides borealis E No No Effect
woodpecker
' May Effect, Not Likely
Rhus michauxii Michaux
s sumac E Yes
to Adverse) Affect
Schwalbea americana American E No No Effect
chaffseed
*--"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range); "T(S/A)" denotes
Threatened due to similarity of appearance (these species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7
consultation)
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archaeology and Historical Structures: According to the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO), there are no known archeological sites within the project area, and it is unlikely any
archaeological resources eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be
affected by the project. In a NCDOT memorandum dated June 16, 1998 (Appendix 3 of the EA),
it was documented that SHPO recommends no survey for archaeological resources; therefore, no
further compliance with either Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 or
with Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 is required.
SHPO conducted a file search and found no structures of historical or architectural importance
located within the project area. In a SHPO memorandum dated April 22, 1998 (Appendix 3 of
the EA), SHPO recommends no surveys for historic architectural resources be conducted for this
project.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
6
The ACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), a wetland
mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The
purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of
waters of the United States. Mitigation for wetland and surface water impacts has been defined
by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing
impacts over time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Executive Order 11990
(Protection of Wetlands) and Department of Transportation Order 5660.1 A (Preservation of the
Nations Wetlands) emphasize protection of the functions and values provided by wetlands.
These directives require that new construction in wetlands be avoided as much as possible and
that all practicable measures are taken to minimize or mitigate impacts to wetlands.
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to
avoid and minimize wetland impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all
remaining wetland impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during project planning, and
minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
AVOIDANCE: All wetland areas not affected by the project will be protected from unnecessary
encroachment.
1. No staging of construction equipment or storage of construction supplies will be allowed
in wetlands or near surface waters.
2. Site 2, Bridge: By choosing to bridge the wetland and stream system associated with the
UT to Beaver Creek at Site 2 (sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings), NCDOT has avoided
all jurisdictional impacts (approximately 0.13 acre of wetland impacts and 16 linear feet
of stream impacts) at Site 2.
3. Site 2, Cored-Slab Design: The cored-slab design eliminated the need for a temporary
work bridge or causeway.
MINIMIZATION: Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps
to reduce the adverse impacts. Minimization techniques implemented include the following.
1. Protection of Surface Waters BMP: In order to minimize potential impacts to water
resources in the project area, NCDOT's BMPs for the Protection of Surface Waters will
be strictly enforced during the construction phase of the project.
2. Erosion and Sediment Control: Measures will be taken to ensure that sediment and
erosion control devices will not be placed in wetland areas, except for devices such as silt
fences and rock check dams in drainage areas which limit sediment from getting into the
wetland.
3. Ditching: It is the policy of the NCDOT to eliminate lateral ditching in wetlands as much
as possible, thus preserving the hydrology of adjacent wetlands.
4. Median Width: The project was designed using a 16.0-foot median width to keep
wetland impacts to a minimum.
5. Site 1, 72-inch Pipe: The existing 72-inch pipe at Site 1 (sheet 4 of 6 of permit drawings)
will be extended and not buried to avoid the possibility of a perched pipe at the inlet end
(see attached meeting minutes dated August 22, 2002). The pond at the outlet will work
as a grade control; therefore, no rip-rap will be placed in the streambed.
7
6. Site 2, Preformed Scour Hole: At the request of the DWQ, a preformed scour hole was
added at the outlet of the 15-inch pipe located within Site 2 (Sheet 6 of 9 of permit
drawings) to dissipate energy and velocity.
7. Stormwater: NCDOT will not allow any stormwater to be discharged directly into the
stream. Instead, stormwater will be designed to drain to properly designed stormwater
detention facilities/apparatuses. At Site 1 (Sheet 4 of 9 of the permit drawings),
stormwater will be diverted onto rip-rap pads to slow velocities and then filtered through
the adjacent wetland to prevent it from directly discharging into the stream. At Site 2
(Sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings), stormwater will be diverted to preformed scour
holes and rip-rap catchment basins to prevent stormwater from being discharged directly
into the stream.
COMPENSATION: The primary emphasis of compensatory mitigation is to reestablish a
condition similar to what would have existed if the project was not built. As previously stated,
mitigation is limited to reasonable expenditures and practicable considerations related to highway
operation. Mitigation is generally accomplished through a combination of methods designed to
replace wetland functions and values lost as a result of construction of the project. These
methods include restoration of wetlands; enhancement of existing wetlands; and creation of new
wetlands from uplands, borrow pits, and other non-wetland areas. Where such options may not
be available, or when existing wetlands and wetland-surface water complexes are considered to
be important resources worthy of preservation, consideration is given to preservation as at least
one component of a compensatory mitigation proposal.
FHWA Step Down Compliance: All compensatory mitigation must be in compliance with 23
CFR Part 777.9, "Mitigation of Impacts," that describes the actions that should be followed to
qualify for federal-aid highway funding. This process known as the FHWA "Step Down"
procedure includes the following:
1. Consideration must be given to mitigation within the right-of-way and should include the
enhancement of existing wetlands and the creation of new wetlands in the highway
median, borrow pit areas, interchange areas, and along the roadside.
2. Where mitigation within the right-of-way does not fully offset wetland losses,
compensatory mitigation may be conducted outside the right-of-way including
enhancement, creation, and preservation.
Based upon agreements stipulated in the "Memorandum of Agreement Among the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District" (MOA), it
is understood that the EEP will assume responsibility for satisfying the CWA compensatory
mitigation requirements for NCDOT projects that are listed in Exhibit 1 of the subject MOA
during the EEP transition period which ends on June 30, 2005.
Since the subject project is listed in Exhibit 1 of the MOA, the necessary compensatory
mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to waters that are jurisdictional under the CWA will be
provided by the EEP. The offsetting mitigation will derive from an inventory of assets already in
existence within the same eight-digit cataloguing unit. The NCDOT has avoided and minimized
impacts to jurisdictional resources to the greatest extent practicable as described above. The
8
remaining unavoidable impacts requiring mitigation consist of 0.19 acre of jurisdictional riverine
wetland impacts which will be offset by compensatory mitigation provided by the EEP.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14 for
the activities described above. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC, we will
provide $200.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 Water Quality Certification
application previously noted in this application (see Subject line). Seven copies of this
application are provided to DWQ for review.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information please do not hesitate to contact Carla Dagnino at 919-715-1456.
Sincerely,
r
Grego J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington (Cover Letter Only)
Mr. William Gilmore, P.E., EEP Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality (7 Copies)
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Craig Young, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Mr. John F. Sullivan, III, FHWA
Mr. Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jim Rerko, Division Environmental Officer
9
IiArr
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NIIC HAIT F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 20, 2004
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Sir:
LYNDO Tlhht,•rr
SECRETARY
Subject: Cumberland County. Widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from the
proposed Hope Mills Bypass to North of US 401 (Raeford Road). Federal Aid
No. STP-1141 (7), State Project No. 8.2442901, TIP No. U-3311B, WBS Element
34917.3.3.
The purpose of this letter is to request that the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
provide confirmation of willingness to provide compensatory mitigation for the project in
accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed July 22, 2003 by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (ACE), the N.C. Department of Natural Resources (DENR), and the N.C.
Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
NCDOT proposes to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass to US 401 (Raeford Road) including a new section on new location between
SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive) and US 401. The length of the proposed Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) project U-3311 B is approximately 2.8 miles.
RESOURCES UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 AND 401 OF THE
CLEAN WATER ACT.
NCDOT has avoided and minimized the impacts to jurisdictional areas to the greatest extent
practicable as described in the permit application. A copy of the permit application can be found
at http://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Applications.htm1. The remaining impacts to
jurisdictional areas requiring mitigation consist of 0.19 acre to riverine wetlands. These impacts
will be compensated for by mitigation provided by the EEP.
The project is located in the outer Coastal Plain physiographic province and the eastern Sandhills
physiographic province in Cumberland County in the Cape Fear River Basin (United States
Geologic Survey 1USGS1 I-lydrologic Catalog Unit 03030004, N.C. Division of Water Quality
MAILING ADDRESS: rr i rnu,nr 919-715-1 ;00 LOCATION:
N(; DI PAr'nnrnr Or Twtc, •')i, rarvrtr PAX (i1941 ;-1 ;01 L72 ri.,•irvi b vi
{'111,1 r,r U n i I r•Pni ni r Ili) Eirimwnnni uir Aw-i rx, I'LB ; nn 1 ,;,
1 "M MAn ;• n ,i (;i n u I, WI !:',IIL WWW w,wi! ()/It, I!i, v,n t1(; 2 7,04
IDWQ1 Subbasin 01-06-15). Jurisdictional impacts and proposed compensatory 1111th-latiun me
as lullows.
.Jurisdictional Stream Impacts: Stream impacts total 56 linear feet to a perennial unncuned
tributary (UT) to Beaver Creek (DWQ Stream Index Number 18-31-24-5) within Site 1. Because
the proposed impacts to the stream are less than 150 linear feet, they will not require mitigation.
Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts: Wetland impacts total 0.19 acre to a riverine alluvial swamp
wetland within Site 1. Compensatory mitigation is proposed to consist of mitigation provided by
EEP for the 0.19 acre of impacts.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Richard Spencer (ACE Coordinator) at U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington. North
Carolina 28402-1890. Please indicate that the EEP will provide 0.19 acre of compensatory
mitigation for the aforementioned wetland impacts. Mr. Spencer's FAX number is 919-251-
4025. The current let date for the project is June 15, 2004.
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed; the DWQ requires a
formal letter from EEP indicating willingness and ability to provide the mitigation work
requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a letter of confirmation be addressed to Mr.
John Hennessy of the DWQ, with copies submitted to NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to call Carla
Dagnino at 919-715-1456.
Sincerely,
GW
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. William Gilmore, P.E., EEP Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Craig Young, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Mr. John F. Sullivan, III, FI IWA
Mr. "ferry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jim Rerko, Division Environmental 011icer
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
R
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Proiect Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Mailing Address: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Dev & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attention: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleieh, NC 27699-1548
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: NA
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
Name of project: Widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 to the proposed Hope
Mills Bypass
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): U-331 1B
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Cumberland County Nearest Town: Fayetteville, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
US 401 to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass
5. Site coordinates, if available (Lat/Long): Approximate locations include begin project
(35.04250N. 78.9903'W), end project (35 0063°N 78.9817°W)• Site 1 (Unnamed Tributary to
Beaver Creek and Alluvial Swamp 35.0359'N, 78.9850°W) and Site 2 (Bridge, 35.0359°N,
78 9868°W)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): NA
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Beaver
Creek
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River Basin
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 8
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The project area is comprised of residential development,
businesses a school, and undeveloped forested land. The project area is located in the
Coastal Plain physiographic province. This area of Cumberland County is characterized as
gently sloping with more pronounced sloping, near streams The project area is located
approximately 130 to 230 feet above sea level.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT
proposes to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from the proposed Hope
Mills Bypass to US 401(Raeford Road) including a new section on new location between SR
3328 (Mary Kirk Drive) and US 401. A more detailed description can be found in the cover
letter as well as in the EA. Heavy-duty construction equipment will be used.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This project will help relieve congestion resulting
from growth along the southern portion of SR 1141 and west of this corridor. It will also
reduce the accident potential along SR 1141. Together with Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) Project U-620 (Hope Mills Bypass) and TIP Project U-3424 (Bunce Road),
SR 1141 will provide a southwestern loop facility that allows developing areas direct access
to I-95 Business and Fort Bragg. In addition, the proposed alignment will remove traffic
from the highly congested Brentwood Elementary School area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application. NA
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
Page 3 of 8
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts to j risdictional areas under
the Clean Water Act (CWA) due to the proposed project footprint include 0.19 acre of
permanent impacts to riverine wetlands and 56 linear feet of permanent impacts to perennial
stream Impacts to jurisdictional areas occur within Site 1 of the attached permit drawings
(Sheet 4 of 9).
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact Area of Located within Distance to Nearest
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact 100-year Floodplain** Stream (linear feet) Type of Wetland***
(indicate on ma) (acres) (es/no)
Mechanized Riverine Alluvial
1 Clearing 0.07 Yes Adjacent to stream Swamp
(Permanent) I
1 Fill (Permanent) 0.12 Yes Adjacent to stream Riverine Alluvial
Swamp
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, tilt,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httl2://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: NA
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.19 acre
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width of Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** Stream Before Intermittent?
(indicate on ma (linear feet) Impact (leases ecif )

1 Fill (Permanent) 56 UT to Beaver Creek 100 feet
(Braided System) Perennial
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated np-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.us¢s.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.towzone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 56 linear feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below: NA
Page 4 of 8
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): NA
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): NA
Size of watershed draining to pond: NA Expected pond surface area: NA
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The NCDOT is committed to
incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize wetland
impacts, and to provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining wetland impacts.
Avoidance measures were taken during project planning, and minimization measures were
incorporated as part of the project design. Detailed descriptions of avoidance and minimization
measures can be found in the attached cover letter.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
Page 5 of 8
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httl2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed. All jurisdictional impacts occur within Site 1 (Sheet
4 of the attached permit drawings). Impacts requiring mitigation consist of 0.19 acre of
permanent impacts to a riverine alluvial swamp which will be offset by compensatory
mitigation provided by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). A more _detailed description of the
mitigation plan can be found in the cover letter.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): NA
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.19
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): NA
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ® No ?
Page 6 of 8
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
I NA 3 NA
2 NA 1.5 NA
Total NA NA
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0242 or.0260. NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property. In order to minimize impacts to water resources in the entire
impact area. NCDOT's Best Manasement Practices (BMP's) for the Protection of Surface
Waters will be strictly enforced during the entire life of the project. The NCDOT, in
cooperation with the DWO, has developed a sedimentation control program for highway projects
which adopts formal BMP's for the protection of surface waters. Based on comments received
from the DWQ, NCDOT will not allow any stormwater to be discharged directly into the stream.
Instead, stormwater will be designed to drain to properly designed stormwater detention
facilities/apparatuses. At Site 1 (see Sheet 4 of 9 of the permit drawings), stormwater will be
diverted to the wetland to prevent it from directly discharging into the stream. At Site 2 (see
Page 7 of 8
M
Sheet 6 of 9 of the permit drawings) stormwater will be diverted to preformed scour holes and
lip-rap catchment basins to prevent storrwater from being; discharged directly into the stream.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
NA

?A
Applicaht/Agent's Signature I Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
:fin-ust 22, 2002
Subject: Draft Minutes Intera-11 encv Hydraulic Desi(:;n Rey ie\v Nleetin-, On r-\u-,u t
2002, for U-3-3 I I B, Cumberland COLIMV.
Team Mcmbcrs
Richard Spencer - USAGE (Present)
John Hennessy - NCDWQ (Present)
David Cox - NCWRC (Present)
Heather Montague - NCDOT PDEA (Present)
Howard Hall - USFWS (Absent)
Christopher Militsclier - USEPA-Raleigh (Present)
Participants:
David Chang - NCDOT Hydraulics
David Fuh - MA Engineering
Catty Houser - NCDOT Design Services
Marshall Clawson - NCDOT Hydraulics
Virginia Mabry - NCDOT Design Services
Anne Hunt - NCDOT Hvdraulics
The meeting began with Marshall Clawson giving a brief description of the project. The project consists of the
widening of SR 1141 with a short section of new location. The exiting shoulder section will be replaced with a curb and
gutter section. This widening will tie into die proposed curb and gutter section of the U-0620 project to be let before
this project. The two stream and wetland impacted sites were discussed.
1. Bridge at station 121+00 to station 122+00 -L-: John Hennessy requested that the wetlands impacted by the bridge
be noted on the permit in the summary table. David Fuh and Marshall Clawson agreed to do this.
2. Wetland Site at station 17+00 to station 21+00 -Y 12 This site has an existing 72" pipe to be extended. John
Hennessv asked if the pipe would be buried a foot. Marshall Clawson stated that with an existing pipe the ext.nsion
might result in a perched pipe at the inlet end. David Cox saw no problem if the inlet was not buried if it kept the
pipe from being perched. The pond at the outlet would work as a grade control. John Hennessy also requested that
the rip rap symbol at the outlet of the pipe be clarified so no rip rap will be placed in die bed. This was also agreed
to be done.
Subject: Minutes from Interagency Permit Review Meeting on
October 17, 2002 for U-3311 B (Bingham Drive Widening),
Cumberland County
Participants:
Anne Gamber, NCDOT Hydraulics
David Chang, NCDOT Hydraulics
Galen Cail, NCDOT Hydraulics
Virginia Mabry, NCDOT Design Services
Team Members:
John Hennessy, NCDWQ (present)
David Cox, NCWRC (present)
Richard Spencer, USACE (present, via phone)
Chris Militscher, EPA (absent)
Gary Jordan, USFWS (present)
Heather Montague, NCDOT PD&EA
The meeting began with Anne giving an overview of the project.
1) Bridge Crossing Site 2• Richard requested that the details concerning the proposed
bridge be included with the permit including bridge type, number of piers (and size),
material on the spill thru slopes (Class Il rip rap w/ filter fabric), etc. There was also
concern about how the bridge would be constructed and if a cored slab had been
investigated. The cored slab may allow top-down construction and eliminate the need
for a work bridge or causeway. Anne and Virginia said the bridge was on a curve and
skewed and a cored slab may not be possible to use at this site. This issue will be
investigated with the Structure Design and Geotechincal Units.
Action taken: The bridge was redesigned as a cored slab with top down
construction.
2) Cross Pipe Site 1: Richard requested he be provided with a x-section along the
center line of the cross pipe. He also noted no rip ra.p in the base of the channel at the
outlet. Anne commented that the detail calls for no rip rap in the base of the channel
and the plan view will be corrected to reflect.
Action taken: The profile is included. The rip rap symbol was revised.
3) Preformed Scour Hole Site 2 West Side: John recommended a PSH at the outlet at
Site 2 on the west side. Anne noted that the outlet pipe is a 24" and the topo is steep
at the outlet. It was determined a PSH would not be practical at this site. John also
requested a PSH at the end of the 15" pipe at the opposite bridge face. Anne agreed
to implement it.
Action taken: A preformed scour hole was added at the outlet of the 15" pipe.
I ,t.-a..-3 = - ?. r » \' la .. \l , ?.?"r`^? ? r r _ ? rr? : r.. 'ti. • ?i /?"._... •C ? i ? 1 1• ? , 1 1
v..: ° W
CL M
CY)
•Y i ??a s . `.
(1 • i ,,,? ?• •? '•
?' • h O -
0 co
CY)
cv)
LIJ
LLJ
Z V) O O
rl) LL
P) LL
1
O 3 O -----ter- 4---------- --- Z : e ;' r
C) o c;
w Z Q Q NK
?` O J N p wog'
Li <
oowOmw I .._3.. ....,
? o

Z W N
0 ~

Z O
Lo
?-i O
O
CD c)
r

cr a Z
c
CL
M
V1
O O3?
V) ?
O Q
o L) 0
cri cr
= 4 O
Q. QN U- r
7
ti Z - m W
Q Q
O J N Q
O N E
Z OOz a: LLJ ? om
N CO F-
CL ;E u Q
p a V Z 0 O
W W m _
m a
Z N
=
~
cr w
V). LAJ

°I ? N / ^i

e
t
a
i
't

-iJLB WETLAND BOUNDARY PROPOSED BRIDGE
WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
CL
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
DENOTES FILL IN (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
® SURFACE WATER EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL IN
® SURFACE WATER
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND WOODS LINE
®
IN
DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
¦
DRAINAGE INLET

---
DENOTES DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
• DENOTES MECHANIZED ROOTWAO
• CLEARING
-- FLOW DIRECTION m2N RIP RAP
TB
?- TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
- - C -PROP. LIMIT OF CUT IF AVAILABLE
- - - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- P?-- - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-POE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT LEVEL SPREADER (L S)
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
DITCH /
- EPB - EXIST. ENDANGERED GRASS SWALE
PLANT BOUNDARY
n WATER SURFACE
x x x x x LIVE STAKES
x x x N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
Q2D BOULDER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
-- CORE FIBER ROLLS CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2442901 (U-3311B)
SR 1141 (BINGHADt DR.) FROM PROPOSED
HOPE MILLS BYPASS TO
U.S.401 (RAEFORD RD.)
SHEET 1? OF O 12/ 17/ 2002
\ W ?
r?rA
? J
i
r
I
1I
w 1/.I
,-HO WLB-
N
5-

w_
11? ill?!?"III, i
66
y
HO WL8 -
OZ
-H0. WLB
81

0
O O
LAJ
z N
m
QN>- ? °
?0
?t
a ?
p
N O
?
Z 6
U5

= O
JCL

O
t C)
N
Q
Q
v
^
CO ui
Q
rON
j CrNa
w z or c6
0 0
? Q v 01

pOV ) ?a O
U c
Q- m
v V
Z r
M W
N =
N

6
LC)
0
w
CD
a
U
?n V)
N

z ° ry
,
Ca
I H ? H c" C

` ? O Q

Z N
I
?

W
c

r 0 0 W x` o

u n
o
~
> 4
N
I^
z
A Q

:D
u

0
C?

x

-r

?I
N

b

u
N
? g
96691 LO '.'^=7
--
I

b
1 ? Cl?

\ a

k?
o IQ
K
; W
? co

N F?

?1
I I Z
?
III J

I
I ?
I ?

O I

OD i
,O

O n"

? ?o
3
j
j o
D

)
k of V)
=
N

' 1 r
J

( \

k a
o
c a

F(a. LZ
- oO a p
N
0
O
00
?oo/ I ' J
LL
>-
0 LLJ °D a

m
? I m aN?
U
W
oMo
i I
3
CL
W
ooU?m?

" a o
ANN O?"
" I Z Q- LLi Lti
m .= U',
1 ?'
N N
z O
154
co J_
"
a o
" ?- CSP
24
OOo k
N
UY N ?' Q
a.
00 0?....
, " ?j r Q
8 n.. N
Id 0: 1
wte gad - wLa
? CC U 2 jr? i I ? ?
?
E-4
'. O
-y- Q: LL
L d G
? j
V) 1.0
Lli
V ? \ w
i
.. to
O
8lM OH C
0
E _ -E
OC ) O n Ol? ?G' `ll U 0?? ?a4? T ??E 1
IS' CSP -
0000 °y
Opl W
oof ozl O -c Z- co 15 co
0000
0?y
. ?1
w I 3(ld 8
I ,,f LU
0
o W
W
E-4
?? J o I i

H
I
? Ir? r,' I

? - I

Q- Z-1

- Q
C)
C
D
I \
O
G O r`
lfl ? q ? O
? ?
f ? Q
O CC
a

J
w
cr-
O?
or_
O
ti
07
W
k
W

W
m
lL.l
Z
ti
J
W
?i
ti
O
cr-
Q-
+1
O
ti
?L I J
Q-
? O
= O
LL-
cr-
ti
o
LL-
o?
i
o
/ Cl-- J
1 N?R?AL ? ? Ql) z
Z-1 o
ac Q
I
I

r
?
r
1 ?
I
?
I
r
I /
11 ?

LL
.

J
I cr-
'

Q I
O I' ?

O

? I
J ? J
Q I Q

?

J7
r

O
O
M
N
r-
O
O
N
N
r
O
O
+
N
r-
0
0
0
N
r-
O
O
0%
r
c ,
w _ -
z '" _ --
-0
D ;,
H
1- Fr- Nl CL N
C I Z O
0-
JC?O?N?
Z
m
4= O N Q O
I1. Z a O
O J N O >- 0
OZ(r00:2
OW QA/t< o
V J
> :W
L
CD Q O
0 O
r
L; ??a
z . O W
= w
to V)
I
w w
J J
4 Q
V V
Vl ? N
A

o
-Fu E r-
o n
Z
o¢
?
z

rn > a
z x o
C o? Lo N ?C7 Ua
W? E Hx Qo,
Q
w z
oo

w
LL
a
W 16
I-
¢ a

? V o
W (Tl F'
U

uj N

F-
W
Ca U
¢
LL a
O
D
(n (n v
C U
C

O Ll n
Q m Z
lL
v Q
N M
c
m
=z
dd
o
w
1
w CM

M M .S ?p
d' O
0 O
0
y U
N
F'-
()
Q

N

O N
C
CL
U
> m
o
a m
x
w c

z
v
CL
o g =
Z W Ecu
cu o
? I I I
UJI
? 1
N
c
m
m
o
a
I s
d a Q
U '
?a m
T
7 1.-,
n p
fh m

N
Z N
f7 ? It
i
N Wi
' p
W
0'
4
)
O

N J
} O
o
O S
+I N
u

o N

O
a
F-

g O ? u
l ? j
I
I
? I .-- I t j
j I
J
?
?
(n Z ?I
? N I
l I
i
I I
I
j I
l I
j F-
O
i a

PARCEL NO. NAMES ADDRESSES
120 W.H. ELLIOT JR.
KEMP-ROBINSON FAMILY
121
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
122 ARRAN LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH
126
WILLIAM H. ELLIOT III
P.O. Box 9267
Fayetteville, NC 28311-7696
3284 Bethlehem Rd.
Blockstock, SC 29014-8907
1130 Bingham Dr.
Fayetteville, NC 2B304,,
P.O. Box 40254
Fayetteville, NC 28309-0254
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
PROJECT 8.2442901 (U-33118)
S.R. 1141(BINGHAM) FROM PROPOSED HOPE
MILLS
BYPASS TO U.S. 401(RAEFORD RD.)
HEFT n OF Q 12/17/20
r
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
April 30, 2004
WETLANDS /40t GRDIJI'
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Manager,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center VVAfFR (UALiTY
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548 SECrfUl+d
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) Widening, U-331113, Cumberland County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) will provide compensation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by
you in a letter dated April 20, 2004, the impacts are located in CU 03030004 of the Cape Fear
River Basin in the Southern Inner Coastal Plain Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Wetland Impacts: 0.19 acre
As stated in your letter, the subject project is listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of
Agreement among the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Wilmington District dated July 22, 2003. The ecosystem enhancement for the subject project
will be provided in accordance with Section IX, EEP Transition Period, of this agreement.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Transition Manager
cc: Richard Spencer, USACE-Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: U-3311 B
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/
NorthCarolina
AM(rally
f
?-l WA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Mr. Richard Spencer
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28403
Dear Mr. Spencer:
April 30, 2004
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Subject: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) Widening, U-3311 B, Cumberland County,
Southern Inner Coastal Plain Eco-Region
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
(EEP) proposes to provide preservation to compensate for the unavoidable 0.19 ac. of wetland
impacts of the subject project in the following manner:
Wetland Preservation 0 0.1) in same eco-region 0.9 ac.)
Great Coharie Site, Sampson County
The subject TIP project is listed in Exhibit 2 of the Memorandum of Agreement among
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
dated July 22, 2003. The ecosystem enhancement for the project will be provided in accordance
with Section IX, EEP Transition Period, of the Agreement.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Transition Manager
cc: Phil Harris, Office of Natural Environment, NCDOT
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: U-3311 B
NC DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program One
1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652 NorthCarollina
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/ NahM4
Natural Resources
N
tl? ,r ,I
h tai °o
U o
OUP
py ? ~ i
???
YI,- US ,0
9. ? TO H0? -?---F-??
WS ? l l /il /
o $ Q
? `?
o
E
? ? o o M aW

...,
o
p o
d ?
pe E,

O `n `0 3 ?g ? $ 41 E,
r
W ?:
I U ...
v1 . ..._t4
1 U vi V

w
? p
c,m J -__-___
m -
g U
??v
\ m I p?
W 7 U
2 QrC4
U D C
1 T I

:. , I 1
z
I 1? d?w?m°? ? t I - _. -
- ? E r ' I I? ??L _?
r-r t a? x L N4
1 ?_ \ L r x 0
i
N

? d o o
?
I U Y C) ? ?
I ?
U
? 1
N
? Z
??
m T
? V
I- 2
I
>
ty ?
h 4
F ?
m I
p
m
q?

s

6

?m?
°
?
e
s g
? 2
O
ti
U y
p I

?

1 O

? 2
O
0.
r
` 2
W
m I
?
1
8 Ln

t?
z g
0
U ?j ?
Z
U I 2
m ?
i'

11

I ?
N o
? ?
b
`V

• \W a
W ?
1

2 i

y

?
ti
t
? F
U L
L
c
c
1
I

l

1 °

1,
F
C
?

` C
°
V
3

?
a. 2
C

?\
?1? R
4
t

wrong ..._.. .

O O
'
?
U O
W
O I
W ?
I
I
81
N
a N
?
a ?

U yy
I
r ?
' ° ? r
pA1
L^V n
aE ? i' ?
?
y w ti
3

? d I
LD
CL
3
?a
O
? 0
Q A LT
N ?"
? C.7 ?
p cc R
Np W?,
.F#; SIIL'>SI.{y.L{i {II'?U i'Ei titFF4':!?f ._:
ti
I .. ? , I I I I ? N
i I i I i 00 03 x o I i CC3 a iI a° ?A
o I I I. I 11 1 0
LJ LJ I i l_I
i I ?_ I 1
U
o
??Fy o
O O N A y
^I c
_° F- m CL
m m O u m N O C .t] °
° °
;v o o -o c
-com O a o ?ami _ E N ° 'o U u n "' = m o rn o o °, v° in
0 0 ° c o oc 3
C) 0 m' ?0 m o o s `c v 0 m m E 3 $° s a> o o c o o o cm
U N a V N N N J= V V i2 a m m U- V LL. F- t% N= 3 O N w N
I I I I I I I I I I >I I I I I I + x I I i
1 N N N H H U U > 1- O V I I I I m
, i I I Cal
N x? 3 w w
Y r I i I I CD ?
I I I ? ? I I I I I I? I I I I ®< '? ? ? I I I I ( W_ O •? I I I
T N N 6 U u LL W ' I O X. I I
I ? I I I
?! ? w '
_ r y
? m
c 'o • ,? r UJ nl : 'C N
w .. p w u ^I .C° •C
'Or- 0
?i w ° w w m O V m m .O y m _
'0 w m .n U m .o ° m ` ° m
o o -o E c
vi' i 3 V -° j c p .n o o U o
V) N m CJ m ° w u U U " ° <E:
m c N m m c c a .0- D cY? a w °? ° °
c o a x 0 ;? is O v=i o -° 0 03
c m° -o
O ?. A E m
`m o° o 3 a m~ >. E m ?° o CM rn
0 C)
3 3
o N o l7 o n. i- _ H n_ i.? o Q€ c :3 m m c_ E S E a? _o d o 0
BE -° m N .° C7 -0 3 °- v F' -n -o 0 Mo m c c > > U Z E m m c c
'° N -0 m. m +m- 'o m '° m- '° ,,m„ m r- ^I a C p C w w
;J m o m o m o N m o m `o m .. o m o m
C o° 0 0 0 ° Z ='
m m
'o o 'o C 'o C "° C 'D C 'o C p 'o C 'D C F-` y y
m 0 m 0 °1 9 ? 21 ?. m m " :7 Z m m m m m m C m p C C
o o o o o o C ° o +: c c E m a a a s a u
a
< u u 0 U " a
m m O O a) m m m m U m U m C 2 m m m O O SO O` O` y O O O H O H
ce- N w p oC O N w a nc D CR D? oc p oG O? ? w in u ?- tJ re
a a? a a CL a U. Lu a
-0 + +? 0 0 9> ®0 0© o a I ®o o ®o m o o 00H El
o ? I
?G ? I I
LM
m
a h o N
0 °°'
® m _ m m
m y o s
- _ m 0 p m m C m ` c L O J CO FO U
m m a a a+n .L m .C m ° O j _ C u j O C
m m m m c E 0 15 c
>, m O a o°• 0 0 d -° s> O 0 0 0 m o o `o `m C7 a "e -' V
3 m o N ;3
c t m° s s s>> rL a y c s m s o m° ::E
w 0 m m m CL CL .. p O C c m C m ; y1 .x C u m y
C) °? 3 3 c c c o m o 0 o m m c s> ;? 0 o N cn ° 0 m 0 0
U c o C° n°. n°. H H -°, ° s `c »-' V S E ° m o F- Z` 3 ?- O 3 a
O o m ? CL ». o. ci u m ° `m `m a gym. s a y 3 > a ° E ?C 5:- o
Z o 'o > ?n in In y -0 'o 0 .
y 3 m . 3 m y y m 3 C L• C m IV C
= a U°. in a JI Ln a Ln at dS a U = N° u'S v a°. 3 : Ua a° C? ?? ap N° in ?° 3 us- ?v in
I I I I I I I i I I T I ? I I ??
I I I I I f I i 1 I IZI
I I I I 1 1 p Q? I?QI U w W? a I ? t I i i
a I I ?I LLI .I ® I f I
1 I II
w I I I I I LJ
Z I I I I ,I ? I i I I ? i i
w
~ m
5 E o o 0 c
w o ?? ` a a m m -?
Eti oc m o o C7
v E y
Q : Y a O < m m c o m -
u -c u 4;
m m m m o :3 a
+- C SO C CL -c _ ::E m m m y y w w : U p
vi U tr ti CCj tL a '? V o o a 3 0 u O C o rn 3 E _ o=
II N y m U. m W- m m a >. >. E u u c o o m=
c Y ,a ' 0 9 ° 3 0 0 o D Q Q c c c ° 0 o-
LA. -0 Ln
m in in u o o l9 U .n E c ,.. ` ,. m 0 0 0 0 s
m m c m? ,Q v v m m ? U rn°° Y° O 0° E d d m; c o y o 0? -0
.c o c c
O n. a s 'o o L o o ,n n N w s s s m c c o E E o
0 0 w
>
m m o m .. p 0
... o o s o >>> o o rn
o tt o ? m a
N v? 3 U m 3 U U U U lt. E c c cC a k a " U U w° ?? F? ri. E a CL m a c o°e ce d m v CL CL d. 6. CL -2 D E o o 0 0 0 0 3 N o o ' 'mO^ o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 3 0 .0 0 0 a O -0 -n o
w U a CL a c. CL a U IL a wc a m t? a a a U -? a? a a a` N Ec 0 In !n V) lL a m` m
U>{'Ulfi i?^•. `d!'.'.L ???.iiJ?6am ?: '.'?.1C; 'ilj

g c z
N ?
i /- Qp;LL
? C
c
g z" W N?
m ?s QZE
'?',.e wZ Qo
J ?? a qQ P aw
q
od
? II II
II ? II J
AVM a0 114019 - Q
VOW F10'X3 I-
W
v 0
w
O
a ?
Q
= N
??o
W
z
w? z
m
a
3W7 73 YV =
.(0 3003 U
i
a
11 -'"? 4
? N L'r 1 1 N L
?o O O
1 Z IZ
X11 CD z W
o
H
11 ?? O
W O
UV LOU 11 , 2 N a Z ~
1 8 O
LL o N ?_- ?
1 U?bU O O_ a} (n H J
1 O h- ° Z ::D J
O Q O
1 ?
W ?• "f'? _ cr- w W
cZ W = N ? F-
t- 1 ~ W do C:: CO
J
1 O _ ?? S
z Z U CL
to ? Ln -1 1 3 0 w LL Q Q t0 Q
1 N J W N (?
w 1 i s Q O z
11 a J ?- LL F--
11 x
< $ Wo O N
c? L LJ W
ti
c?U ?U 1 1 ?„ ?Q O o fi
_ ? 11 3 3
QNO ?? 1 7
ii !X
d cc;
O
z
0
>1 ?
O
Z
u u u v v o 0 0 0 0 ? ? W W =+ ? ???? ? 3

LJ
z

?z

a

< ?

°q
<

< Z

°•
<?

?

Z_

?

?

N `? N h ?

N W C P

^ K 12
P
C
< 1
O
s
<
?

N
W
? m
N
' O? !?yJ
O?
? d +' v?1 O
K~ <
O W y
?
ry
a0 m u<
O? W
ry
m m W
l?
W ? S 9?

? _]
? c

?
00
O?

u
u o
12 W

o
uoo

w'
m

9

0
2
?
'
z
O
o
? o' o

v U
z
W• -
V ^ Y5 ?o

R
V $
?
nN
? ^ ?b ? Sib

W Y

? ?

? Z

g b

? Y

g o

_

g =
b
?

W?

g j
ab
?
V
3
j
j a u!

W u ? O ? ? ? a F JI O U :9 V A 3 O V ? ~ Oj O V O
N
? `?
? ` ? zzry ? Y < x
? IY'I
? ? ? ? f?'1 ` ? ? QZ g s!
v<j p
Y b p1 1 EEE5 ? 9 ^ 9 `
I 6 ll 0
} g z$ o
?
v? Q
a $ ^ ?
r v} O
a ? .? ? u < j
` llZZjj a

Q
"?y
° ?n W
„Wo p
o?

?:. 'o,
„o?yy
?oWyW N d
b u0?

? b? oLLo

Y?

W1
F

?

a

µl

?

?
o$ ? z z esO? O ?uZ o? o ? u
0 10 ? (`a?! 8 ? <
u
O +
+ 7
O >u
? >u
?
?
? ?
? u
2
x u
y
?a da oOc >
<S oOc
?.< o
?a? O
>i? 0
x O
r?3 O 0 ?
d? 0
d<3 O
?i ?
da3 ? ? ? i'o ? 8 >
? N M 'IT 'n
?".
N
M
Yt
?
c`'?
"I
NO
N C Z
L'
•
ix z u P
Q? ?
a? Cz
z •

u
? C J
i
Z

m Z;
a w ?
QZ?
w
G M
? oW ..?R
'Z W ?, DEN

a
^O J 4 u77 G I? N

U

ti O
a'm ooN
N 1- V'
O LnM +
+ + M
N Q +
N -
oQ
n
LO (A
Ln Ln O
00F-
O ~F-0
Z O M O
0
-?O)
z0
0Ln++ }
t Q. co LT
U ? Q ai
L'i N Q Q Q Q
J V) V) V) V)
Q V) V) In In
U
LlJJJJ
r l l l l
~
W 0 0 0 0
V) ? = M ?
Z) LL LL LL LL
a \
L3
7

a
5 V)
J
Q
z
W O
ti U Ln
J
)O?m O'
00
pi I +
O d
O+
tD Qi+ 0-
+ Ln
Qj L V Q Q 0
-a ~
Q F-Q 40
' H V)
Ln N LW
O
~ ~ D O
O O N W -
l6CO V)G
tr co N lY N
LA + +
+ N V
L N N M U J
7
HFa--~ F-
N Ln V) to O
tY
' J J J 0 LL
1 1 V W
)0200 FW
tz x= 00
LL LL LL Z U
b I
I
I
I
I
I
q1 ;---0
II
II
II
II
_ 11
?nJ
J
I ?
L4
0
N F- z
U W J
al ??
c
L
=o
a
N ?
C
6
Z
1 z
o I

W? U
S LL1 ?J -
N
- ?Q -j
F-
."
4

as
aQ
00
=x
WW
U U
z z
0 D
lD m
J ?
IQ- F- F-
00
M d 00 0
O O O V1
ti n~ LJ In ti
V- W } M N
O)ON? n
aF- Fa-N
V) V) N V) LN V)
N 000000
o CO LO 0000
z Mp-I_000
Z tiNr`NwiM
Q V
O OT'
+ +
F- 1? N + co Q)
W NVOIh am
V) adaaaa
F- H F- F- F- H
Q Ln (A V) LI) V) N
U I I I I I I
a J J J J J J
j- 1 1 1 1 1 1
~ ? 2 2 2 2 ?
W000000
In lY LY ? lY ? ?
W t1 tL LL W lL
c) O
00

W ? ? 6
J
Z s
Lu
u
o
°
W
??
W
U
o
m L?
O
V
°
o

` I U
O
=
„ P N H C = C C C ry
m 1?/y?
m z
=

V
Q
?
.
I
5
6 L
(L (n N . I ,
r N f'') ? ?A n ?.. Ch ? tC1 ?r N ? ?l ? rrv ? M ? F- ? ? Z
LO O ~
CO Lb It
Z_ N F 1
L7 N J +
W 1 p
ma +
{L V) O N
O co 0 +
O O N O O V
6 f'"'C Q Ln0
M W N r F
+ 0 } ? Z V Q
O O Q ~ O
N?MQ F_ QN
F-
°? a ?
W V) O
Q Q F..., F-
N z VV) N o
O O F- to 1 +
F- {L F O
o LD G? + o
D O ti m ) 000
L'i
Ln ON Q T w C; P-
+ + + + N O +
NLD rn " +M
?NNV V) QO
aaaa aaa
F- F- H F- O F- F-
(n V) V) Ln V)N
1 1 1 1 N 1 1
J J J J J J
1 1 1 1 I I
2 MM 2 N 2 2
0000 0 0
x x x x cr 0:
w w U.. U- • LL LL
• P"
a \o

Lfd QQ-
J
7
qJ
0
F-
v
iRC Mo61T OO
'w Op
r_-OMTO
p VnowO +
M M ? In In Q) - Ln
Q a F a- - a F a- F .a .. F a- Q
N F- F-
V) (/) N Ln N In
000000F00
F- F_ F- F- F- H F-
ti OLDO00
O. 000 000
r` O N LO O 0
Owt,omooo mQ
r-± O (7) V V M
N M V- -Z L n a)
c
aaaaaaaa
F-
V)NNNV)NNN
IJ J J J J J J J
L
® O ?
c
N
U ?2
J
q1 ??

N-I
r--
N
I - 0z -----
I
I Z
I O
a.•??1u
LLJ
I V)
I
I J
I U
- - CL ----
I
H
?? aW
2
"I
?a98 N
o
00000000
MMMMMxxM
wwwwwwww
<L .L LL LL W W 11 LL
1 M
1 CO
I O
.N
LO
F-
L/)
O
O
O
O
U
a
I H
I L/)
I I
J
I
12
O
Q
N
O
Z
o?
f- $
UW
1.L.i
N
J
Q
U_
1L
F-
as
as
&x o
Ww 0
U U cl:
z z
ZD :D W
lb LD U
z
M
J ?
O O O
O O O
00 W O
00 + + O O+
co 00 ZM
Ln In
Q
OFF--
N N _ V)
00 U O
F- f-- 2 F-
F-
O O 0
Z Oo O s O
O Ln z O
z Lr) P- W O
+ + M+
F- MN 300
U Ln Ln Ln
O
LLJ
V) z a
F- F- Q F-
aN N W V)
U I I U 1
CL J J Q J
>- I I L? I
~ 2 2 = 2
LLJ O O O o
V) ct M W C?
O LL Li LL
II it
II II
a?
o \
a
J
15L
7
J?,
q1
I I
"

v ? I r
M
w I I L^
I
O

Q 3 I i ti Z

C)

N;I
1 W

I Z
l a a 1
o I o

I
> w f-
U
N w
V)
o
I
Q F- U

o?
?z
zz

O ?
z z
O 0

Z Z_
LLJ
a a LLJ
?N?(Y Z > Wm--->?
07)o Y a > O p a 0
m s N U
v
0 U
W Q 3 0
W
O
Z
W Z
WJ
C] CL F- W
's
0 ?
s'
O J
Y F- LJ 0 -

??
w
L
U -
w L'i ?
?,?2C7
Y L
O
Z Qu7WW
?N lr ... .-.
0
Q
0+00 w Ea tD+LO n700
C', V N O O
LD + Ln
z N N N_ N O O1`
in
in
0
O
d__
} N_ h --

h +

N +
+
+
a
N h N N c N
N a a

Q Z
Q

N a s
d Q Q
h
a h 0 h

Nh VIN W

N h

h
N?NNNN
N
Q 0 0 J O O a 0 < 0 9 0 0? 0
h
0
Z N O P U
cr,
?:O
W O
O 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0
0000A90
Z ,
00
CO tf)tD CO
O Z 6 z6 L. O O IDN
O

U am r- + +
0 + + O
+ O= 0-
2
h .t

0 O

h Lfl ti t1.1 N + N
+
+ ++ + O_

LLJ
N

Q Qh
~' p

3 - U

N -

a
Q
Q
1Q'F-
Q
J h
N N N N N J F-
N J F
-F
-I
•-I
-
N N N N N N
U 1 Oti? _
U Ln tD?O7N t0
c >-
ll
,
, LL i d rrrrrr
j M M M
M
M
0 0 0 0 0 W
, > h
O W 0 0 0 0 0 0
li li Li Li W
II • 4..
II L? L- U- L? W U-
II II
it II II II

----------- ------- ----
b
? Q

W Q, N
01
11
z

a oz
II z

•3 II ?, z

I I 1 ? ? O O
? ? ? II U
W U
II = cn W
wti I I ow N
a ?? 11 w? Q J
Ln II Q
? U w ~ f-
-----=---------------
? cp
h } 3 y ? F-
o
ti? o v

II
II II
II II
II .I
II
°
a
x
0 _
z
m ?
C
p u
J ?
O u
c
O
O -
O ?
O -
N <
N -
a F
~ v
N
O
O a
z 0 ;
O
<n
- ? F
ui
N h 5
N
Q C?
a r L
rl ?
O
l? t
?W
q Y
III III III
°
a
2
O
Z
co
°
O
O
O
O
N
+
Q
h
N
O
h
0
N
co
v
a
h
N
N
r
O
x
LL
°
cr
° It
Y Z Y 2
Y O Lr Z_
?Ym
r r
3 Ir °
Q Q J
? O z 0
O W co to
lfj J Oj co
h ZLD+
} - +
- N_ -
a I c
h z a F-
N :2 N N
O j O
Ln h a ? h
o a o
Z O y 0 0 0
Ztn zN0
2+ 2 + v+
h - -
wa°- ¢a
N h } h h
JN JvNN
Q 1 1 1
U N :D N N
d r 1i- 5-': 5-
r 1 W I 1
V)
W O O O
Nx r ==
u- • LL lr_
II
it II
u

w
a
C? o
?

?W
W
3 vl
1 h O
41 I z
i z
?? I O
I ?
?J U
T'?J w
? 01; Q
_U
U W ?
- > - -------
? w
3 ?
s
II II
II II

O
z

Z
_O

v
W 1
to

b
i
U ?
N °w

J
41 ?a
?D C',
Q
U
(L b

°
2
a
O
0
Z
a
z
W
2
N
O
O / cv
O W
m O
+ a
F- °
a O
N
m O O
U
O O
Z o W
Z O j
co
V
LLJ
N Fa-
N o
Q I x
U Q
ar w
>- I 3
o U-
LL
L
III
°
x
a
0
M
Z
a
Z
Li
2
N
O
O
O
O
+
c
h
N
O
h
C9
N
ti
O
d
h
N
}
O
x
U-
?
q0
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I O
I z
I
?? 110 0
F-
U
W
I N
c I
I Q
11 q U
l o
I ?
II
II
01
II
•3 1 I
JJ
7 II
II m ?O1~
a

?j V1 U
Y
t I

N ee{{
o Z `? • L m F... W i2 .
]
`? ?
N =
N W
?3
g z ..
a F (,
(D Z-j u

W K a s
a
o
Y 0.C c Z Lu
d v °?
• ?? „ q 0 u 0
w

a cn r

J of
c

Lij W

V

u

o ? Z z

o
H
1
5
.g ' M h ^ P P H vl K K u (? N
m QZ? QV A iI o
?
W o o
Z
a' ?? cLCn > ? > ? g
. 5 . > ?, > : > ? ? ? ? $
? O

3
J
`
y
Q?
e-
U
N
U
M
U
??pp
U
tn
U
?
0
N
0
M
?
`?f
D
N
n
?
uJ
M
w
tf
w
?
I
?
N
o?
M
oc
?f
cc
?-
?
3
z

c=j
II II
I II p M

4
P LJ Z)

0
?O H
F-
M W
? 06 O
, 0
co CL

ua
u O

Q
z D
U
?
a Q
a F-
U
Y O
OJ Q N
U W cr U O
N aJ Z U
Q ° ma a w
b l o w °? m m w
I w? O Q W
_ o a
Q

I
O
da z v)
?$

U

F-

`n w
F-

O
I
U V)
s z
i W 00
N N X 0 F-
qJ ( o MQ
Z v o >
o n
U N Q OZ M V' J >-
o V r- o w a c6
U
N ? U
U wIn dQ C I
N
I- J N N F-- >"
Q
U N M
to W

r
~ oo W
w -
v) of
a
o
:3 Li w z

0 CD
00 0 0 CO
o d
u Z 0+
co 0
V) F-
Q: Q 1 C!: J (r
u fY] M I?

?) b H J
a
? Q o a
x? z
w Zm _ m
m0 L? '0

M
Q)
N 0 O? - r-)

?n W a - Q

o
a
z N
? ° o
' o I t?--1 J 1 ~ N :k V-

•3 I z 0
0 CL .
O
N I
o1 1? Q 0
oo _
z ±
z
V-
L U h ? to N

J W W

1!
? ? 1
W O O O
7I.Lw • w
v)I a Cr
. l a
00
00 LO
00 O O
L'i
d F-0 d O
r i
° ° O N
O N 0-.
+ + v v
00 +
K) M ? (n
F- F- Q f-
N VI N N
F- ~
00 0
O O O J ? ?
Q N
U
z°oo aco°m+
R M >- Lf1 tf)
° Q Q Z Q 4
UNN OVIN
J J ? J J
m m CY1 Cn
Q ZN p ZV)
U V V V V
I I Q I I
as as
w0 w u02- li.
/T
`O v
SIRS bC1! INAd 3JNIN
F-
V
b
HINGE Po/N7
FOR FILLS
C7
?2 I?
---------------
IAJ
n * ? 2

I
?
O II a
I
I?
J I
?
II ?
I o $ II ? ?
? I
3 II
II

U
N
a N _____________
I I __
w o I I ?
,??e-^?•• O ?
W O ?
o
a z

W °

Q
a

a
?
1

? I U
I
? >b.
N
o
? ? II
~ v
?
w °
a
? 3
?
01 II
II
I I ?
?
N ?
} II

?
'_-'\ ? 2 g I II?
I I ? ?
II 3 ti
' a L) n
00
o
C
O
3
a1
P?
o ?
M
II
°o
+O O
M O
?a
) N N
O
[ O
p N
• I1'n lt'1
) Q cT
mm
) N V)
i CO m
1 00
1
I
JJ
V' V
)aa
)ww
ILD 0
: N (D
00 00
? to M
as
1 V) N
00
oo
.00
I 00
R M
I ~ H
I V) N
Z V)
J J
I co co
i Q V
I I
;oo
laa
Iww
-------------
on?
V ?
U

O N
? O
w a
O ? IP
?
Q ?o yy
? 9
Z '
Q N

O
? U ?
W
?
J
a
U
tD
? ?

? o

U
4
I W =T
W o W? 1
v
lq-

0
0
N
+
N
U')
Q
H
0
r
O
= O
O O
Z +
Z O
O -
f- a
W N
In
V) a
=) w
W
a >
U ir
4. ?
F- ?
lr,l O
O
Z
Z
j O
ti u
o W
? J
o Q
J 0-
f-

O
z cnU pO
G" Z n
LLLLLLiii LL
N LL
N LL
N U.
N U.
N W
N LL
N LL
N LL
N U) N N N N

n A
1L IN z
a
o
g r4
N
g
rM?7
N?N o
"
o
o
(2 (n ?N W 0 V r r N M N r r r r r

z C Z ^"
w
w C-? pz?
w W D o w
R
L aZ o W
o

ow Eo
?. u A
L-
w
w 9
0. wza a w U)i Vi W LL N
0
m co
La r4

Nn a

0! z w
L--
to
N U-
N U.
N IL
N U.
N
U.
N U.
N U.
U. N
N
w
N
U.
U)
N
U.

.
N

.
N

L
N
U3

w
0 O m N m

oo V

v rOf

o ^

o O

O m N

$

r
C4
to

^
?

K
c
(0

m

a
LO/..
U 10 11 1 r N N r N N r ''
z v) N N N N iA N N N N N N U Lq 1!? N
J q e a r
'
O m m m 0o to O h m O N r O N O Od
? N r r r r M r r r r r r r r r r
¢ Z L_
3 S V
V U)
co N
M N
m U. N
10 N N U.
V N U. h N
ul
a: R Q$ 0T
It
N
?
n
K
O
r
H
' o
V
-m
ON
l0
41
W
? N
r N
r N
r N
r m
r M
r M
r M
r M
r m ? ? 00
Z LL
N U.
N U.
N U.
N U.
to U.
N LL
N LL
N U.
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
N U.
N U.
N U.
V) U.
N W.
N U.
N
N
U.
U.
N U.
N w
N U.
N LL
N LL
N
ul
Q r
O N VI
V M N M
m 10 , NI M
m m
r
N
O1
V1 Ly
N
O
?l N
O m
o0

m

m cc

A a

I V.- 10
Mf

of H
1? N

O O

N V
p, O0 O W, V r V h ti N O w 00 (G O O N 1 L% f "L
r y N N N N N N V N r r N r r r

J LL

N LL

N LL

N LL

N w

N w

N LL

N LL

N LL

N LL

N LL

N W

N LL

N LL

N w

N

N
w LL

N w

N LL

N w

N

N
w LL

U)

1j

Lj

U.

U LL

N
w
N
w
N
w
N
a
a Lg

O Y1

m
V

O N

N
O O

t0
M r

O
CO M

O
U

a M

N
m N

(0
17 m

N
M O

m
L oo

N

r n

m r

Q m m

m m

m
m m

m a m

m M

O
O N

m
O

O
q

O

M Q

(")
h

O
V
M
m
O
A
co
O

a1
Q O t O N ` h r V V f O r r O
M
r V
r
N
N
N O
N m
r m
M m
r
N
N
r I
r V N H
N w
r r4
r
r
r H
r
r
m
m
m r O
N O
N
N m
r
Q
Y
C7
N
J twt?
Y
N
W J
?
z
~
N
p a
w
z
LU
T
p W
J
O
Z
N
tY
T_ ix :3 z x > O O W Q O Z J = ? z Fw- a ? w - j 3 a^ O

[-j
1 w
0
a
u
'S
O
j
0
2
m
L
-
m
w
a
U c
Y
v
!
a
O
t
a
N
V)
:
In
z
O
a
1 o g o d u L
Q. a d
w Y Y m
d i
LU S
ra m
? o 0i = o 0 } 3 J
9 d LS- 3
0
z z 7 w w OR w
ui
> N
w _ w
w v g w z a w z w

a
K
w
Q w _
? z
0
O
z
} a o
H
o
w
LL
w
a. -
i
LL v -) p o f
Lqy? W v a Q

i
g w
Lz O

S
a > a U ~
?
0 -.4
w
Z yy n M pp V Ft; aa??
?f V ttpp
V V nq V po
N N N ay}
N N N N N N 100
,

r z
w
2
J
U
Q
U)
U)
U
Q
U
Q
U
Q
U)
N
U
Q
U
Q
U
Q
LL
N
LL
N

U.
LL
o0
LL
N
U.
N
LL
m
LL
O
W
h
LL
M
®
®
K w
w co
r
O

H
r
p

O
r
O

N M?
s`1
O
N
O
cl
O NN
N
r
H
N
M
V
'.
V
?..
n
?..
n
r
a
0 ® 5 "1 ,
1-4
®
z
w Q
aa
a
W
E o? o

?
W U w
LL,
LL
U.
LL
LL
y?
/
Md ?
? 1wN
? N
w N
N N
t00 N

0
co
® Q
mI] W
Y) 10 N M N Q ^ '

?

Q
M
C?
M
17
M
1?
' d z
~ LL
N LL
N U
Q U
Q LL
N U
Q LL
N LL
N N LL LL N U
Q M M
I? m 7 > 7>#? LL

N

N
t
/1
p w
U co

N ? Ln

r W)
r

O to

O

9 (4

O Q
pt

m
m

Ln

O

N
O

>

>
AL

.

H
lY

F
lY 6.

H
lY

z

O
1 N '. ?- F F w w w

7
U
2
2 r U
Q U
Q N
h U
Q U
Q
LL U)
^ U
Q z
> z
> z
Z) y U. N
m U-
(0 W W W
y

0: 4
Q 2 J
L0

fr
m

r

?

V

N N

O

?

h

W

13

W

a

w

O

)

a

N

? fY

m
ww r) L v N 00
r IY a 5 ^ r
r m
r d 0 O
D Q Q Q

Q Z r

U
Q

Q

U
Q

U
Q

Q

U
Q

Q

N

U
Q U

W U

W U

W

w

w H

w
LL.
N
U.
N
w z s
a}
m
V
10
°?
r? I+
N
O U
ad U
d u
a,tl
QN
Q
QNQ -
m n
a
M r r O N eN
?
N V W
oLt W
e6 W
ca

w
? w LL
N LL
N U

Q U

Q U

Q U
Q
LL LL
U) U.
N U
Q U
Q LL
N U

Q U

Q U

Q LL
N LL
N LL

N LL
N U.
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
N
L
2 Y
Q Q
~ co
N cN0 V
N n
V 00
r m
N ^
N N
V N
00 n
H O
" pf
N
QL
V H
N O
N H
a r
M N
ti m
t0
00 N
m 000
H7 ? N
O
m
': r C O O O N V O O r C O O Cj N 0 N N N N
r.1 e?
0 0

'

U

U

LL
N

U

U

Q

U

U

U

L.
N

LL

N

U

U

U

Q

U

U

Q

LL

N

U

U

Q

LL

N

LL

N

LL

N

W

N

LL

N

LL

N
C
L
ti O a
L" Q
N Q
H N
00 Q
(0

M Q
m Q
10 Q
N
M m

N Q

P. Q

V

r

V Q

N

w

Cl) m

10 Q

C3 N
10 L.
M M

m r,

f` m

n

U- Uli O Q
F' n
M N
t0 O
V /0
'`
f07 h
V W
N V
r y
N O
' O
N r
N O
N m O
N
r m
' m
m m
Qi n
N h
N M
'
Q Q
O O
}
?
N
U))
N
U))
N
V
Z LU
w
Z
Z O L.N.
N N Z
O
w
i
a 0
O
N Z W
z

Q
N W
z

Q Z
O W w
z W z
O z
O w
zz

Q O
S

O y?
hw- F-
Q1/)
p O
S

0 O
2

O 2
0
9

O
w

Y N a
ga z
O

!- z
S z
0

U) N
r

g ?-
W

J
Z O
U)

=

w

J
-?

O
V)
lY W U
F- w
z J
J 2 z
= 2 2 i z
O S
7 S 2 ]
(7 7 m S N
O F m
J U
O O w z
Q
U JJ
J F
Q }r
O p H z
g p
O

z
: ?
o
o
a O
O
o ?
O ?
O in
O

a

Q 13
o
zo
p O Z
a
a
N

?
?a Z
0 >.
z
cc

=

m Q

= N

o

v 2

a
?
-j ? +
N (
'j N > > U S
p H L ? G ? :- }r N Q o ? ww (D w Z p z w z^ o t t7 U) 2 d z Q = a
U. M O z
p }
J J
J J
(0 }
J }
J }
J }
J O
W w
W }

J r U. p

?

p K
S O LL

o? U U Q

fY ? Z

g

? LL' w

Y J U'

Z J

Z W
0 g
a w f
?
m
> 0
a; t
a? f
?
Z
W N S
w U K
w
?
m 0
U
O 0 tL?
W.
p
2
JL ?
U ? ?
? ? w
? z
Y N
m
o Lr i ro m Q
p Q
0 's m Q
a Q
t7 p Z co Q ?
a ' U LL

m
U W W
W
W
W BLS.) p Om o

O r
m W z
w
?
W
0.U
3
J

U O
Q z

Q

r

N

M

f

N

0

.

O

m

O

r

r

r

N

r

p

r

M

r

a

N

0

.

O

r

m

r

O

N

N

N

N

M

N

V

N

N

N

)
N

r

N

O

N

m

N

O

M
0
=
U U 0.
0go\slr)aagse.epw qi t£En\P3xa1£EO\659d
E00Z-3a0-9t
AlON10U000V 03SIA3U SV3UV 9l'BZl 'VZL'ZL 133UVd 'BL 133UVd NO 03SIA3U 3317 NVd 031V3UO GZL V VZL S130klVd M3N'SL 9 ZL S133UVd NO 03SIA3U S3NIl ki)J3dO8d iMU tOlLL2L NOISIA3u
'AlONIOU030V 03SIA3U SV3UV 'ZV V CY S130UVd NO 03M U331 SS-6Y'LY'6C-CL'SZ-8L'LL'BL'CLYL'VO L'OL'O S'Z'L S130UVd NO o300V 3f1d dMU CO/9Z/90 NOISIA3U
O
2 rn u ^ p
n
C W =
Z W LL
V) LL
0 LL
In U.
N LL
to U.
N LL
U) LL
In LL
V) LL
V) LL
to LL
N U.
lq LL
N LL
w
1-
W
W m
h z U a
t t.y 2?
L
Pi 2
Q Ld
V) ID
!
r
h N
N
W) O
w
N 00
h
o0 p?
V
01 N
M
H r
N
r to
to
M N
O
to M
co
h 0f
t0
r
N

V) t
0,
W : N
N
N
r
V
N
''
N
r N
a
G. Z n?
>

z t
tm w F
9 a W
U.
N
U)
N
N
w CJ N
W a Z W
3` ro oNi H N
? m ? 0
7aa
W p
LU a Z to n
LL M
= O E O
u
z
U a s C W V) U) Y)
1 N N Q

d

4
IIII I W? z X.

V)

0
W

V C)
O
V

r C
4
l0

M
"'
N

N

O
Na .
t
K<

W
U

a
LL

V)
LL
LL
LL

U)
LL

N
LL
LL
U.
LL

N
LL

N
LL

N
U

Q
IL

N
LL

N
LL

ti)
U.

a
LL

V)

LL

N

U

a
z r
Z W 00
v N
co V)
h
a H
r4 y
M
N V)
co
-4 h
M
M

h tD
O h
O to
co to
Cl) 00
N
u M
N to
Ir
O V)
V Q
O T
tD
V tG r
',
W
h
V

W) p co

N

O

M e?

r 1

N h

N I?

r

H

O
QQ z

Z
r U

a lV) 0LL
)
V) LL
N L?
N LL
U)) LL
W LL LL
N
LL

Q
ul

0: w M C3
a}
to

n 0

0

O

]
o
M

M
V)
Q i ,,,1
LU
iV r
O 01
N t7
M N
M
N n C1
N V) N
O1 p a{
co
M N N
O
QQ z 1.. LL
N LL
V) U.
V) LL
N LL
V) LL
to LL
V)
U
U
a LL
N
V LL
N U.
N
U
W Z S
a O h
N co
N M H 01
h Q

N

M h

h Q N
H

N Q
CD

Q 1 C 0+ t
D N N Oo
N
N
co
n
H
w
? lD N
H h
r to
r V
r M
r -
to
r N N (4
H M
r to
r N

a W U.
to
Q LL
V) LL
V) LL
N LL
V) LL
W w
Q LL
N
U.
V) LL.
N LL
n
( LL.
N
V) LL
V)
Q LL
V) LL
V) U.
V)
LL LL
N
Q
X h N `It i0 M .Z y
y
O O U)
M t0 p t
p
V N N H h .0 LL.
V) LL
V) V
j
to
00
Q a
~ r
O N h N M N h
7 O
N O
00
O r N t0
m O ?' 10 Q1 h O O h M
tD N N N N J N V M v O of N ax N
W

i LL
V)
U LL
V) LL
V) LL
N LL
V) LL
V)
z LL
V) LL
N LL
V) U.
N LL
V) U.
N
U U LL
W
U LL
N LL
a LL
(A LL
V) U.
N LL
V) LL
V) U
-
QQ
< W
O
Q

)
¢
O
N
Vf
w
N

O
tD
M
t0

co
H
N
It
N
m
Ol
N
to
?t

N
a a

y
N
Q
H

W
h

H
h

M
N

a
N

~

h Q

n
r M
N {G
t0
H 10
N
r w
to
r to
N
r O

1"f
U t0
t1?(?
M O
tD
r co
N
r H
N
r O
N
r t0

N M
r y

'•
h
M
r M
01
r O
O
N
t0 O
0
n
to I
O
0?
Ot

r
r r r r fV iV
W w

?

W ?V)
:
W
x

N

Y
z
OO
Q
}
N
~
n?1 cc
ui
t U
3 O
n1
T

N

W
Z 1 h w z
w a. ~ 0- V)
O W W J O Y4
O O N 1= O
U = z 2 a N ¢? J U Y O U)
i U
'? O
T Q
T > z
wr? o
m o
T m
? a
O
Q u? z
x J
y ? o d k z
7 Y
? c
?
U Q
Y U y
U
O
O J
w
O O
Y ¢ } 1Q K J p > U W 2
a Q O = cr V D N W p yS Q J V)
z Q 'S w
a i O O S?
P?1 Yf o z z ? T a , ? y a ; z U.
0
w
a
1 a T _ U W wJ w a
i
p?q ?q
hd "+? `? w
LL
J

W
U O

N

!n

O

h

0/

1
H

?

01
O

O ^

O
N

O
M

O

V
O

H
O

t0
O

h
O

O
O

0f
O

O r

N

^

V
r

h
r

to

h

O

Ot
r

O

N

(h9)'
?
? z
na. r r r r r r r

?
pp
qq
Fed ~
C"' >
z
N
N
N LL
N LL
N LL
N LL
V) LL
N U.
N LL
V) LL
V) LL
N U.
V) LL
V) LL
V)
Q LL
V) LL
N LL
N
Q LL
V)
FrO
Wq 6 J W h O to V)
M N C? C3 Ln yh N V1 N by 0a?? N tyq 07 r4 ? O N HM
0 W O y O N T h O O f7 O O O O O O O N M Q N M
r V A
-,
C t0
r
h1?iss CL

?wH I I

yA
0 ?aW
pzW U)

m
Vd
r, CL
v? H
ao
?
?V Zw~
W O W
z .4
LL
N
LL
N
LL
fl)
LL
V)
LL
t
o
LL
V
)
aZ 1 rl)
In
(a
? tWp tt
app
® a O N M ^ 0 m n

f
O: Z

w
LL

V)
U.

m

LL

N

LL

N

LL

N

LL

V)

LL

N

LL

LL

W

U.

V)

LL

N

LL

V1

U

Q

L
N

a

L
m

L
U)

L.

V)

2
Z W
N
O V)

O

co

W)

--

O
:e3}

3

N

W

0f
to

O

m

tD
w
w
h

G

O

W

M
N

1:

M
N

N

0

r

to
p

00 L)

M

N

O

O r

O
U r .
N
h
to
r
r
O
r
O co
N

z U.
N LL
N LL
N
U
U LL.
N LL.
H
U LL
V) LL
ff)

U LL
Q In N N M M N N
N
N l?
Ir
h
N
H
x w
Q j J M r N
' N M N to H n 0? to n N
w cc
r co
r N h h h h
r M
M r
U
Z LL
N LL
N LL
V) LL
N LL
N U.
V) LL
N U.
N LL
U) U.
V) LL
U) LL
N LL
V)
u w
V) LL
V) LL
0 LL
0 U.
.1
s
K a (7
H
N
H
?}
H
M
eNopp
O Q ¢ O V)

N N

O to
00
Q 2 ?Q' t: N N H N N N N `1 to U) a Q1 tD
G O
N C"
0 co
co
00
co
co
m
co
m
w
00
ro
CO
N
vi
1
N
N
N

Z U.
V) LL
(1) LL
V) LL
V) LL
V) LL
N LL
W
U
LL
LL
LL
LL
U.
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL LL
V) LL
V) LL
N
U
¢ LL
V)
U
¢
U
a
LL
v)
LL
tq
LL
N LL
N
LL LL

y
w n H M H O h a V)
O W
N V)
m CO
to V)
00 N
N V)
N V)
N N
to N
to W
N V)
co V) N
H
M
N
lD
V
00
N
O
V)
to
lY Q
Q

~ co
00 co
W t0
tq M
O N
r N
P.

I h

N

1:

H

N

yy

w

N

N a? t?

N

N

O

;9

N 1

h Cl

M O

M

to

r

O

N
h

a}
a0

?

O

w
h
M N . N O co N N W) N N N N N N W) T N N M O O O N
N N
O O
N N

LL

N

LL

N

LL

V)

U

U

LL

N

LL

V)

U

LL

N

L

L

.

L

L

L

L

.

L

L

L

U.

N

U

LL

N

LL

N

U

U.

V
)

U

V

LL

V)

LL

V)

LL

V)

LL

V)

LL

N
a
r sa
Q W M 01 N a a O to a
co V)
H N
O N
a) V)
O N
O V)
O V)
O V)
e?7 N
01 V) V)
co
H a
to
O a
H l
t+
¢
O
'Q
N

H
ce. O
Q
l"
N
N

0
O
O

0
m
O
O
M
00
t'1
H
O
m
O
p
of
N
N
to h
r N
O a)
O h
O H
M

r
N

r
O to
O co
O

r
O N
pt
Cl)
O
O
N
O

'
O

O
0i

H M
M
4 M
O

M co
01
01

N
t0

v N

h

M
W W
Q Q N N o
N O
N O
N r 01
r O O O O OI 01 01 O1 Of O1 to N t6 O
N N h
H tD r r r M N
O O

i
Y
^
I
J
a
X
W
W
O
O
2
Z
N
W
N ?
' Y U)
w E'
O z
O N
O
w
n
7 z Z O ' 0: [Y
- W z r K O
U) t7 y ¢ m LL Y
V V)
J
y
z z
= ? a 0 ¢ w (z w , a z V)
z 7 x W O 2 a
LL ce T x
T a
O LL 0
W
Z x
V)
w
u
Ix
ix
z
a
J
x

¢
T
U
m
N
2

O
O

W
z
2
0C
O
r
¢
T

2
w
C7
w
W
}
LL
Q
.J
s

N
Z
W

U

O

Q

=
O
i
W

W

~S

w

w

O
m
O
'7

O

O
J
O
z
S
O ? .
z
`.
? U
¢
ul
>
>`
Y
a u
m H QQ
J
z ' m J
>:
)
w
Gv
W
z z
O
}
Gr u W
a ¢
Y U
ix
¢ u
o ¢ ^d H
w ° V) 0 m .
z z w
? T Q
J w > u z w C x K '' w Z z T J
w z ui
w z Z LL z z z c? J W w w > z k o Y n_ z ¢ ? }
o
w ¢ c °a a o w c° o U. a v m LL a o° w a v m Qz a o a z r u ix
o a z O Y C > > ¢ LL ? z
r
} x
m
p
m
O

IL V
J
U p

N

M

V

V)

tD

h

N

QI

O

r

N

M

H-

I
-

01

O

0

M

H

M

a
w

O =

d to t0
1 to o to o tc - h n - h n co o w m 00 co w oo w ao
al
o+
m
a?
U
U 1 1 1 1
wv rt ruwul
slx'laagselep mt gttEEn\laDx4\EE0%S9015g0R:d
EOOZ-)a0.9)
ZO11308Vd N0031VNIW113 P11V1091O11308Vd N00351A38V38V -ZOL 9101 S1308Vd NO 0351A38301 dM8 COILVZI NOISIA38fh8
AIONI08000V 03SIAB8 SV38V 3319 3f1d S913:)8Vd NO 0333lA38 301 Sll-tll'0ll'BOl-COl'lOl-BB'S8'48'ZB-66'Z6 69'L9'6B S1308Vd NO 0300V 3f1d dJt8 E01SZ160 NOISIA38 MQ1

z
z
Q1 n c
f..2 Nn r
w z
?w
W W rP W
?I- 3x a
LL

z t
En .4
0 w
?
W C J 19 0 Z a
z UJ try
W
a
m
?
QZ? LU O
W n N
W
r 6 0 O
?U A° zwr
wc7Z
('
a 10 co o
. uj 3
CL
rIL
r
w LL
y LL
V) U.
V) LL
V) U.
V) (.1
a LL
V) LL
V)
00 N IT a N N r r
V? r Q1 n N M O r r
z U U.
U.
m
m
w J
W W In

K h
N

aa Z
W? S LL
V)
M U.
U)
7 U.
N
h U.
N
h
U
Q
U
Q
Q ?' ? tM"f r 01 M O N
N ^ 'f h n
z U.
V) LL
U) U.
W

N

U.
U.
Y ttoo
r O
o
0
0 N
o
co V)
0
0 n
J Q

W N

O N

O N

O h

v'

a
u U

a u

a VLL
j
M
a
O Q CD
? LO
n o
O M
th co
O h
N
tT m
t0
N
r4 co
r N
r to
M
r
~
N 41
rT,
Ay
w
z
V a
o=
r z
T
a

d z
)
R
F-3

wx

uj r

o

o

=

w

a
r?
?_ z = O 2 a.u OQ Q z a
•• O C ?' m O U
W y W O O
a p

?q9
J
(7
F
W Q
y p
J 7 J
Z

> C3
U w
U
m
/?
cn O 1 U V) W O a
CL z
CL oc
m
y
J
U
Z M to to
to a n
N w
N m
N
pp 0?
?o ?1 d ?- r

r
z z
w W
LL
LL
V)
LL.
y
LL
W y (n cn y
® s O 3
N N
M n
N
0.
?
fir/ CC w r

® p®1 ?aey
¢ W N
N
0
a ? w
N m
N °n
N7

'd Q
FW- O W N

4 wC7Z U

Q LL

y LL

V) LL

V) LL'

y LL

y

N

N
U.
V)

N
4
k'e{ Q Z
?
N
N
Z: o
(a
00 V)

O
W

? 0 ?} M
_
N
M
eel
f
V
a

a% z
F. W LL
V) U U

Q LL
V)
LL

y LL
V) U.
V) LL
V)
U.
U.
U. LL
y
LL LL
V)
U
U
U
U. LL

V) LL

V)

U.

U. LL

V)

U

U LL

V) LL

V)

LL

LL

LL LL

y LL

V)
Z? M ti m .0 n. o y y y M y ^ Q a
eq Q y ^ y V) a Q
00 V) N 0 V) N to M
o h H r m w o 00 n c M n
r ^ M CO

H V

n•

n•

n m

M n

M
U M O C 'tt vi N r O O 0 N r w O O r r
N N to m r ?=
Z r Q LL Q Q Q U. ua N u N N U. N
G: Q W
Q LU J
r V)
tD O N
r r
H N O
O tD
N
w f•
m to
w O
H, N^
h
aw, 'a ?.. O N to O N r i 7
r O
r r
r M
r
O
QQ Z I.. LL
V) LL
V)
U U.
(n LL
V)
Q LL
V)
u LL
V)
LL LL
U)
U
U
u
u U.
V) LL
V) LL
(n U.
V)
N LL
V) U.
y U.
y
w Z S
Q C7 H
M a
O a0 0)
O
M o
N a
r N
N V)
O a
N a
M a
O a
N a
m
O o
to M
to N
N
11 n
(" V)
O o
Q g E2
W Qf
N

M r
'?!

H N N
a M
M
M
N o)
O n; O
N 'n
N to

t"f M

O o) N

O M

r to

M N M

N to

r to O

N M

N
N M M r r M N N

w U
a U
a LL
y LL
y
LL U
a U.
V) LL
V)
N
N LL
y
N LL
y LL
y
a
Q
a
LL
LL
LL
LL
0- LL
V)
u

a LL
U)
u
LL LL
V)
LL
LL
LL
LL. LL

W
Y
Q F
N A
N N
V
O y
O '
W
N tT
M M g
O N
M

10
N r

H V)

O V)

O V)

O V)

O H

N b

e7 .
1

V eOe??

O H

r co

co uN?

f V)

O fn

O fn

O fn

O
O
O N
?"
r
O
fV
t0
O
O
p
M
N

N
N
O N
O O
N
_

Q

U

L
V)

L
W

U

L
V)

L
(n

)
a

.
V)

a

L
V)

L
y

L
V)

V

Q

U

V

Q

U

.
V)

.
V)

L
0

L
W

L
V)

V

a

L
V)

u

L
V)

.
W

L
(n

L
V)

L
V)

L
V)

L
V)
tVv Q W
o? a
V
r a
? M
V
r a
M
M
tb
O O
n,
N
M M
N
N a
M O
O
N cn
m
r
co
0 a
to
`? a
M
O
W O
to
N M
to
M O
h
N N
N
O
^
`r m
N
M a
m N
00 m
N
O N
to
O m
N
tD O
N
N N
hz
1 CO.
O
N
W W
4 G Q ?} a
M ?!
M N
M V
M M
N
M r
?% M
r
t0 h M
?" tD ~
`' M
r O
M O
Cl) N
N e
N M
M O N
r to
H n.
N N
N V O r
r M
r N
N
? O

w 2
j
O
}
r
J d

a.
J y
a
'

Z

J

J

W

U

2
Z
Z 2
u J
J
O
J
a -
!-
O
W O
S
r
W y
W
Z 2
U m
V)

a =
V) O
=
P W
J W
W=
U
W J m
O CC
W
H
LLyy
Q p

=
W
U _J

> Z

W

Z a

?

W Z

y

CL'
y
w O
y O
y r
y O
2 >' J O J a
J O
- y U. m
W
Z 2
p LL [C
W
z J
J m
O U.
7 Y
: y
J OCC W
J}
m W U
W W Z
Q to Y
y O
Cr
> W
Z
w
Z ? Z O
m J
W 0
1- O a 7 ' J

> .

W

J U
:3

a

W

W Z

Z

C¢L

Q

m
[L

m Y

} CL

_

O

Q
W
V)
z
to (aY
;

cc
y
C,
Z U
i
W

J

U
^.
"
S Q
v) CL

J

}

m

J

U
W
J

}

W
?
m
?
F-
O O
C O
fY z g d =
r p a
mCL a
? Q
mG. Q J O F-
?V) Z m ? 2
Z W Q W W J
? Z Q W
z
Q a id U J Q O S z Q O
? Z 00 U
? p
r W F
U F
V) W ? ?
W a
J U Z LL y Q Z Q
Q O
= a
_ N
a a m m a
J z _ J
J Q Z O Z Z W
CY W
L m W
C; H z a: CL
a s x O CC J O O CC W ? W m W r r O 3
? K Z ? U
V) O
z W
Y O
O C
rz CL
z O ~ -m :c V)
ui U LL u U U O Q Z
c a Q m ? O id YJ S W U m . O J
LL
m j Q V)
o m
W w

CL U J

1z
U Z
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
c)
M
M
tM")
M
H
M
1^l
M
M
V
V
d
d
a
'
V
N
N
N
0 =
uu a
1
11 r
NV WK:01
slx-)aaysElep'NJ g1tEEn\PDxa\EE0\6S90\SgWd
EOOZ-)a0-9C
A10MC11030V03SIA3d SV38V 951130Jtld WO8.4G31V3LIOV9511308Vd M3N 03[V380V1Z11338Vd M3N'1Z1130UVd N003SIA38S3NIl A12J3dOdd dMH CO/L11N NOISIAD2 Mrd
mu-N
C ZQ
.........-
Q) I- ? a
C Z r
g ?D z?
QZ
Ous?
I
i 00LE9 0OZ68 001.6Z (Sa11VA JI8f2J) AVS
L60E9 VMS ZL06Z (Sa11VA 01860) 1v1O1 aNVS0
-- -
SOOE lld- M0111109 NO llOSdO1 33V1d311 „01 %9 31VWUS3
26009 1 rO168 Z1. 06Z 1V1O1 103rou
.-- ...__
NOILJf2111SNOJ S30V1OHS a31YWlIS3
OOS OOS- 0NI88f111O 'Y 0NI11V31J Ol 3na SSOI O31VWI1S3
j- - - - - - __ ._._.. _ - - -- - -----.. --
! 5L09- SL09- MO1111O8 3JV1d311 Ol 31SVM
SL09 L9999 YO168 - Z156Z (11-1O11i + 1431) 1V1O1
...... -_.. __
ZY 99902 E4LYZ 660Y ('PA,nD) )WOMH1bV3 1V1O1 MIS 1140111
i
SZ OZ SY 3AV NOS11M SLA-
- ----------- - -
599 898 E6L 11 00+0E 01 O9+OZ -YLA-
ZO8 9562 YSLZ 11a MH0N18 a10 ZLA-
LL L BL 3AV )DON 3HO 0LA-
YL 6Z SL Nnv SS31NnH -LA-
LYE ELE 9Z - -110 HVOaNVN3HS -411-
ZL LZ SL Hsn9ll3dd3d -LA-
8ES ZLL YLL 111 OS+SSL 01 OS+BYL -1-
1 Y9Z 95Y UL 111 OO+LLL Ol OO+YLL -1-
ZZLZ LYBZ 61L 111 OO+YLL Ol 013+901 -1- I
LLLS S9Z9 Y61r 121 09 +90L Ol OS+EL -1-
91ZL 6Z9L ELY 111 OS+EL 01 OO+YY -1- I
1.. _..._... .-_.. .. ._._. ..__._L _.
i SEEL 9L5L Urz 121 00+YY Ol 5 68+ZL -1-
I MOMH111V3 3015 1HO14
I I
-------------- ------------ -----
--- --
+ EE09 1861rY L9019 ELYSL ('PA'na) ASOMH111V31V1O1 3015 U31
F by ! 6 SS - NVIa3W 00+OE Ol OO+EL YLA-
i LE6 LEOI OOL 11 OS+OZ Ol OO+EI YLA E
1,91. LLL 8E6 121 00+0£ Ol OO+YL -YtA- j
OSY 199 lot ld WVHONI8 A311ELA- .
I S . .
ELL i LEE 60L JVS -3a-in J Id WVHVNI0 -£LA-_
l0E ' VL SL£_. 210 )INDL 2IVW -ZLA- I
f . UL 5 L6L _..3" SSO11JNDl -llA- !
OE OE 3AV QOOM1S3110 -6A- j
LZL + ( £ YZL 210 113AN3a -BA- 1
j ZL 9L Be 11a NOIVNIHIAOM -9A7
-
66 I 8 - ZOl 3" 31XNV11d Gk-
SL i LZ E - 11a 30a1113XV1 A-
f i SSL i ZY8 LSS 11 OS+SSL 01 OS+BYL -1-
EYYE 8899L SYZEL OO+LYI -1- Ol 300118
LEEBL + L£E8L 30a1118 Ol 00+LLL 1
9ZL 1 8LL 40Y - - -- 11 00+LLL 01 OS+SLI -1-
f ZLEY ' 6EZl LL99 11 09+91L Ol 00+E8 -1- t
Y66S 99£9 ZLE 11 00 +£8 01 OS+ES -l-
911Z9 96£L OSIL 11 OS+ES 01 OO+LE -1- j
i Y806 I ESZ6 691 11 OO+LE 01 T86 + ZL 1-
11MOMH121V3 3015 1131
NOIIVAVJX3 '
31SVM MO1111O8 %+18W3 In:)d3ONn NOI1VJO1
1 i O3111SSYMNn
saUdA MUD NI
11 r14??l???r Ha "d ID)N i10) 1 Vr1 Cy
i-?: r •? Ortrn
w-•ancen\9f+ee?\ee0\b?,9K\
0
P
o W° CJ OZ X II'
z W
N az QOEo L--I LX_,?.7
'i7 n ,' ton T. y
w ., _
o a IIQ?? r,' °;
0
IIII?? I ;m? _?.
o "
Z
W
W
?
o
N
J IIl/^^)
vl a
Z

ea ?Z
2 ? Q'=
w?

5'ON 13314S 33S
-7- OO*OZ-'fs1S 31vn Ho-Lvn
R
O? J I
?? 6I
I
I
?I
I
f
O $ I
I
I
0 ?I
? I
o a$ I
+„
" w [
Q
? I I
U
f
8
$w
f n
- ? II p th
O •,N 4
m 5/ r+j ? ... l
r ?
o ? ? ?\ ,i•r $ WIC
A I
?o +• ??` GIs ? ?;s
zzz
Iii ?Np O _-- - o • f
i_"
W I? w
O
1?.1 ?}.qq?? 1, C'3 O ?O?Q Wg? yl
V ?c3 ?4~?ti O?q ? ~O
4 $ i ?{? ¢o ??II ?I ?i f 3
W Wtl ul 011 All p
aFd W.?t+SO ? tiH y
14
h 14 ' ~2
Oti ?.?„ 1Z ti?w?>
ti ? ? H O
31 ? ?4gJ
cc?33 ? ? i
? I
Q
k t;
J `
{'. +?1 S YI

,+ DNIN301hVDNlW3M 8.15NOJ 087.9-d NI03# ;
7
a
0
O J
? I
'

•
O J
r
7
- ??
til 1 r
O Q ri-
? I t
IJ . ?
3
om 2 ? •
z
?
U y .
N J h
0. °
°
o
n
a
'? ? .:
e 11-1,
`v
fn
, I
h Eel \-1k I t
-1" .? '' t 1i
y - :ate W?

O/ 97.OS'6LIU'ois 31 oa9\N
\,,} V7aN 'DIC IlI,J AI/CC_/1 'y' `
1, n
"?t ,k I' ft' a
I It' ,
r / / OO^ it
li"W ? •. • r' JU
8 $ ri J
I g ? rl
?'? LS a
Igo
I I ? p$
?I I ? N
al ?17
r[?
h 2
Ilg g??
?" $ $
IIIw
ry u Q ? N
I? ?JW
I 1 1 ?
u?
N
w
a „
o _-
0 1
Z .._
r
Q J

m
I
p ?
Z ?
Vl ?C
p a ?.
1 0
a?
J
3
t? W
I
`V
!? lu ct ) F _
I -
X
1 I
y I
xe,
- -X4
{I tl ?lll ? ??
rUQ-
ddI ?iI U
J,M
I I I 1 I IItr? 1 1 , Q? y 5 l
I
tl 1 ?"'
J l 11p x-
+ I ?J'?,?r 1 1 ? r
¢5c 5' I'.1 2"•.. 0'_ ` - tc_) ?7ri?.? ? IW ` \.
d I IIII II1 1 I rl Ia } r f .' I ,?
.a 1 I
i
, w , [ II 1 II 4 'n I ?
1' 1
o'LL C? j I 1 1 11. ,, ? =, 1
Z^ ? I I ? 11 11i'i 11 [ I
1 1. l t
?? r SI I l a ' A ?? ' I I/ J I r
z _ 1
J ? lid I III "• `{ .1 ??) a
1 it - 1 5 •1
1 t a V? I p 1 s
VO'
4 l ,r u'yRao" I, i ?u ?11'I t?`I 1I 1- 41?n:!%o y' ,1..

kml ?I!
p ?
{ J7

a
I
I
I
I
IJ
I
I -
I a, e
13 ?
I
I
I
?I2
I
I
I I
? c
I I
i I
I I
rH./ 2
--44
7 rl
3 I
I ? I
1 I
( ?I

Q1 U - YON 133NS 93S
° C Z ry o -7- OO+b£'V1S 3Nr7 H01M
z "N
Lr) 'I ILL
a'1 r C Z m r IJ- u , ? ]?(.r . ;? m '_. S :` ,SC I 1 • -Sd W ?
M" o ? d \ O ¢ a • ?? Cl' '`I I ? -`? N W ? ?Z?+? ` ! I' ?3 II ir[ ,? J ,?,
? Jm _. nvv I I
O Z y ?j
N'? '` O..
I $$ 1. 1 x
47 5? r o Q Z _ S : +a , o a
°In
r'1 ? o? 1.7z ? oE? w .ys 1 ? it ? ,ZO^ 'a
W `$ a
r W x ai« w°UW'
c'. 1 oZx" ? I x ? ?? Irw g? i o
III Th

I? Nln YI
V
-,t- beCC as
'a0 3?la3hv7
Nls M is
{?
pp
K
<< ?N
pp
pl
p I
W H' O :, Wm? ft w l I. I I W 1
1,, i 3 I I x^ ? I ? ?I ? n I, I {.
l 1 I y VVV N 7
..I .SII II +? w
'J"
too
2 0 / II / E 1' a
t? 1 It' Y A ? I
CNN m ?.? .r. ? I.?Mi I( si?? ?- -1.-..:- ? 2r t ,t ?.•t• a?h'i z ?, o?,
v? in Q I 5 0 8 pg 8 1 I \ L
11 I 1 ? V1 ^ N i i?
?I ,.\ Q nom. C? I 8p ?' a V I `I.\.,r''?__•Y
r - ? SUP N m ? 00 ? q
oil iJO'1P j`r. o i ?,?? ? ill I,^-^? •1 ] ? I ..r ..
aamm oLL X91 i? l v?'
•t:? ,. / 071
^ sl ?I I
kl I W ? ! ... EE ,. ?
?f? d 3_ ? ! Igo I b I ? t0?? I 5. \ 3m O
I I
? £rsF?ez •oasld r; :; ? I I' I _ o?? ?.1
1°.t I ? I I I I ?$ 4 N
I O !I I m'?i .I I
_ Sz ?, ,, ti L, I w mN
Vn0
woo
0J OK
d ? 41
?` I a z
14.
b L. NdJ N Cj
O
'i I y DV<L. r-
8 F-/-N J u
i q ?-W-
!? y W I'II', I ?.? 0011 a^
C, 8gO$ a I iii ?.? I +.??goy ?iwo o /
4Nn ? b ? 1-?vi O8O0 N/-NO W
Q C: Y 4 N n - -,_?
zo { `?7 p w I II III .1
' '?$ ? ? ? II I illy I .
3 ? i ILI I '?^ t ? o?
I
w
C I ? I NN?.?? ??
" ?.. \\.??.r - r II?V II? ,^ k??- ??II?II II II II
z a I 1 w
I
u p t - i g I?I 8y ? elr { w
L•.NI ...,../ x _...-,, I '? '; _?- 00 pZ133NS Iln HDiv" -vis OZ
a

Z
Z
cnU
ZNO
i? l

?z
?3
z
@ ?? NUn
L

r?M L.
f. (V I-
C Z ^ LL
Q H
C
Z ? ]
w z o, W
„ _
vu-i ?s
rLr
??
N
a z N
S
Y O
<W
ap g
If
JP
?????
0
°W
W
C3
J
Z
Cc I
N
?? j
v9 N N
2
Li W
N
N ?
??4
W ?
W Z ? _
,- U • r
_?! W Q • m
W
Sb
0
°u
0
s•:
3 -
U
L'ON 13314S 33S
-7- 00tLbb1S 3Nn HO1blY
' IIII
I `i I
i
z tk ?
Q;
O = ;t ?^ I-
r$ mt I t. I!k x?- ?-'?
M
4
Z
N
0
w
N
d?
d
d?
e?
` c

o o
o

5'ON 133HS 33S
-7- 00fbF'd1S 3Nn Ho1VIY

J ..
,
P

N NI N
-U- !'29f as
' UC N50e83dd3d

N
p
NN
OZf.. b
x \
v L: p©p?
o ?
a \
,j Q \
2 ?=

U-
8
z
Z
F-

\

? ?

rn
C Z
M
x
_ C u C^U' Ul z'v
W
a? r- Z-"

o ? ?.. Jw
o C
Ln u

G

'3 I--I
L
W
?

`Us'n
CC ? a

09 ;h Z
p }?
8
gel
r c.
Anal
I gor
lid" L
_ w•
a
I
U f r
? ? fJ J
f r?l a
?•JN
I tl +a-an 'R '"'
Cc I _ I I , --_ ?' YmN
--mr, 1 ?`,,1 II I ' ? .: <;•'.,, _-- u m5? !eve r_.w . .
?? ' I 1 < f v~, d w`-' ti) 2x7.97• r
?.?"`.-.;?? ° 1 . •. _ w t j? Baal. o ^ ? I ,..W j l
off,
g- W
'.. ? r _ 'J )a '??I. t =ten l_IW I ?
14 7:-z-
lot 9's
CC I W m? "- zy?
Qa to \. J
?z
¢ZC
= h
a ? -
J ,O? o
3'-
O z
O O .
7 -?
a- - z ,
z
u
w u
a
? Z _c7
O? °2f T ,
HOW
W "?a III II II II IIW
N N I ?QO?ti?cn
22 v1 M
Q
PIS,
c.J in ob?(???W
N II II II II II W
?Q?Jti?h

a;

h
BE

IS

?I?
M
-C.(- 90/1 NS -z.l- L63F F15

loo
R GIs

V , O
8N ? ?^
N
N
Z
O
?:I JA 06 - - w j\
ti LL
-? p
d

Z II I

SQU ?p ~ +

c3 Q

° a
a
`rd`s`
? m I
4K
= W
O ~~ u

< vpi?a -

? O
O
_ po
¢ ? a W
Z
Q
J U? j O
aa
OO
J
U
ll
JJ
Wo9QQ v
dr?Qr?
Q Q "7
m
Q
l? ? i-fit N jU
Ip- o n ¢
ZN ?t~V 6Q.
r
09
w -_
JO's
O M-
a
"

.
CD .
K
Q p .
-.? ?? '
I
I
c ,S Z
? •S d? I ? ?
c
f I ;
Z ?? o I G;
•V I ? 1 1 ?
l-i O_ I ? I I
?
m
iO ( 1 -J III
ON u
F O rl :•1 7r1 l ? Ii I r ,.
?
m 0 ? ?,? -] I
O ?O O .,
.J
? r5 ?!
l i
i
j
u 1n w
°? a
l d o )
6 t I
1
' ?
x
d
y '? h 111 u I ,:
L ~? y of 11? 1 Iii
':i Y I I e` L. II. I I `.?
L L11 d
10.or,L?
0
0
a d
a
, ? N
© n
8V 13 9 S 33S
-7- 00f09bys 3N/7 H01bjy
'r7 ---_
i
8 P ?r 1
Ll W"
01
p I' ° -' + «- 11-
4 a y
_ I-
-',1 4
I. I I? II ,. O 1;.t-L b? `V\\O
J II
got
II II II II II W
Or-
i?
n o+4'1T uiw , ----I o?
? s F J > `n n
zo I y+3 J l o?a\
- .o III f _ I NII II II II
-7 I WI a i "o I y I?
III ? I;?? ?8-? u " I '^•? ? `Ym`3??i
? In
rtil f _ ?
3 1 y o a x ?;? vl -
p i 1-
N ?.,? Il Ijl Z?n$
II w
w J' ,I son 1
tip
] a J
U
J ;-C) "c'
1 t 1.
h w `^
d??> 2 Ilk ?.r) .?_1111,
c v' I Y L` y 1 ?I$ G7 z ui r ?? t I ._ a i ',, ? ..
I I/ 13.1._._ r
'? ll ?11?,17,- f 'J ?w?`3r%? ?'rj ,..._-- ..t_, ; , m rr
.I'. I :. 'nI(1L
I
??s li II
tj c + f'I i.,l
I I'
I '
i
1
o I
.>' Nj0 I
+n I
I
I
:? d I
II
I
I
i
i
I
I?:Ir'1
I it
I Ilt
III .I
I ? 14 I il•.,J? I
,i r s 6? t ?J?
> , I
.j
IOU
955 133HS 33S
-7- 00 AVIS 3M7 RDIVY
p 1 .k-_.. iOf

-ON
? 7
1 I
_

w' ? TjOU .
N?a ? l-
•
. 4g0
W naa ?
r LL
aw O

W f..
Nam
w¢LL 2
O
? QaKC U

I? Rlt
YC)r, a
W
?o
Oi
I
J C
0
SIB N
m N
5.w
i
3
Ou4
N
CC
U

G ZQ°
0
a? vig'a
a C Z'"
'o '
o ?
?" J?
Z No C
Z? wZ
t? v)
cn Q
?lr rrb QEo
?U
o ? ? W a I''??>?
yj ? « ? + I+1
¢. r If© x-Hliz = mrv
_ '_X _. rca F W i'
..X `'` I- Ix C` I ?3 I._O IIQ nM .i1?yL1
J 7,
Sy , >
I I 'I
_" _- -- r a- - - -Y6- S .33'2:
I .R ? I1
!7z ICI 2 4}-
'-1
,. o
I -r
''¢

xl?
FX = ' QI 1]\ I N. - f b.• V ' J? 1
Z a Z o.-? U 4 .? N-
6'ON 13314S 33S
-7- 00+OZ *V-tS 3N7 wim
r x
f- x--- -x -•-x J-?
i k l [ -

?
-sA- 18647 US
J
WO NOIDNIH1a0M
MI?
Q

N
L
Y m ; _
a` Z
z ..
W• ? O .
a ?
X, J.. t 1
0
y+,/,Y, P I - Yf ( col '-J `M1 °
Zr
xr..
_ q
3Q „ µ ?I (C(. I_FU a^;?t 'jj?? ) ?> x;3 w0
o ...- - S I --%a I I' i I
z
y ??Mw. r F r N II II p II
o ; v 0. g88 t, II II?
E
(? - i + ti.t ?m?J?
d
N (+i7 ? Qr- .) i I gg t,2 t I I?, tti n x ,1• /•
v;c
.? z , p ?t x r ?' =. I I I ?. I .:W ; ?_'s '- II rle x tom; h'1 pp? \
m 3. U .F -. F:i f } III II I J fF"----` y; J ?`f r N?O ??
,,: ,` i J bl- 11 , r I ?, a?bqul
0 I O -? .? ?.? r ,erw +I1? III'}', .f ain' ._7 I l`pp?4?9^l?p
? _, o I H _ ' ?? _ t E W I I ?JE. II
if II „ II II
i°- ` U4. ?Jx?q% y 4co `E:$ I7 `i •? I I?? +? ,c I' '? - l!' mb, ?Q?Jh?IW/1
1 '! I I 2 1 w ? wi ?Ir y 1?- 7f ? , ? 4?'t.! j M? - '?^ o
i O u' 1 --
a U - y ui+8 I +LS x------xl ?N
i
+
E = __? ap
1 II - --- ,- $ 957'° lt.9'? (t) 11 i a d Iprl" O?O
X ,x. /,I •,', .4 i:[ at=: ?. d - - I ??r.? g8+ r .li1',?? '-? N11 II 11
I
- - - - .. - ' - - - ?o- - 1 +? ---
r X t ^ E r. I i I F? a ,, a c e?
-I z
w I P?• 4 ?.• I3 t s7 rn,v1
L: Lic,
88 4. I'', ice! I•?,' ` .? _ W,? •' u??^ oo5? I_
17 a
._ - I I, _ t.• r 'I' `0, j I ?d? +I t. 'Jy r 6 I ( rr <w7 $ s o 1
L. I q w on ?4 I / 8 m : O} Ij u
tDc; t. II
tve[ _ - 9 fill, +$Y? ¢1 i -? W?? I
i =r, it 1 ', x l
to .z ^
L.5
SI
.99
r? J - 13 1 -- - s co 41 -.rT -t- 'd1 - Z'-6 chi 1 f4! i.. W W l ?31_
a ----, 'I lu? I -^ ?? sr :r` •`v n,. ?. a,'. - '{--_ __ - 'o ?'m
o
-Y4 I ' w i
1.
O w I t, S T]'g7'51 E ,u ?r
?8
- -- s ?- i
65/6+69 'o1S1S - I I y o I ,? -?
__ ? ? r. y 1 0 'q z-s car, 2a -,+, -?-za co? :.
z) A? 31 _:
I. r °¢ CL I mZ .?" (°??t /f I (Cip
:n+Y I i! + Il •? z<,_„
Z moo - a i,l I II._ I:?? ¢ I +8g?',? t'v(??-? X E? o °Z I vJi ..
I,WO'?, O zw TI
o N r, ¢ i.-? m 4- 2(1 < I yil 't,? ^ u O; _X f ,.? J
QZ V)
10-
r I z
co 00j o c N `x'°- '-_ • , I'., I: -, . _ , ? J I w 11 ?. 8 8 ? 8 `1 a w ? I;_ ?i t ! ,i;' '` .. I I - 0 k
CC M_
d1 Z Q ?'?? a X i - gw - In 4 +w'1? ".,a.$ ?? - I 1.. II I -'= -?.-J ..
zz(0 -l Z C J W 5 P ',t1 _ .-. 8 rl I ' ?T
?Q OU _ ..iJ 501 ?1 t 1 ?^ ? _
V) NQ I 11 I I I I Vi:- }: .i 17,
651£+39 'D6SO
I'I w c5',
a

IG'

a

o [
,
N F

pI NO
;

-SA- born as
'31N 31HhMa?

? N
Q POp
N N 1
?. ) ...
I v I I I 150
( I I _

'
1
1 + I
? ?,I\ 11 z
I_ 1
"- J??;2 1 I?

T
"
IC
,

O ° 1l ?1 ,
1i g , f ?
EE
YJ CI X o•Y? % _ ,,,, 1 t f I' ? - , -` ? LF .; 1 ',, 1, 4 , i, r` + `q ?
t P I
g _ I,X
m?% _ `+ t f ON ?3NS 37 NO1d1Y
a ? r?, ,11. L bls 3N
? ? " " 0 pp+09
H
Co
r
a

P
"
` I?
N N
?
-6A- bU6Z a5
a0 HVUONVN3H5
o,R t"vm
hW
4p

N
?`C
C]
1 O NNo
1 N N

01'08 13314S 33S
-7- 00+58'V1S 3N17 1401M
I . 4 u .x ?Q ?4 I $ 58 I 'll l $/ I?
I? Z I a 'I w,.. $8
v•
CL.
i
Q ?. X _ -r tl 4 %W I y,' tv zl T rl• +? I<
1 W $ -;
----s 8J 59" :a E - 48
? ,.f I ? y I L? ?y 88
?-? ? I ? , S=sl = ? ? lu
? J c p W
1 00
Il :i x?, ? ,', r yr
- ? u rll 'a LMt
?' ^ J' -, -' I? a g I
f l rti I ' ? I
W J , ? r I', J
08
Q2
?I
? I
I
? I y
?Na M
2 2 N
Z Z ? L
WWo
SL
IT !,it
I a ?l p y
I O N N
o u
a
I? li ?I I ? ? t ? o L .n
I I W O n Y" ? u? r N J Q? ?" L ? I- --
I III ? { ?'H ?°n l°?pp I..? X41 ?? N''?vl¢W I_ ? 'l II
?Y..J
+ N ? h R 'S'-I X - J
i I ? P rl-_
e Y7- a 84 084'E
I. y "J
h I \.r `? II
I..1 _
IC^ on O+V N? t Z I
_ Y
r 14
o t, j
8'10N 133HS 33S
-7- 00+ZL'V1S 31V7 H,)1V19
Z -, _...... __-?
u d a x
a r
I a it x l l
L
s „ IJ I
X X I x - _?
ac _
- W J
,x ,` w x I l
41
J O $
x _7 + a
I?OJ 0' ? Va
-71 Ij
LLN; ?,? I
- N
faj I I ___ -
-A 0.
w If J n' %..I :. I
T
c
x K
N I Y:
J.f 0?? _ ?II? +y
o. I .? J yW_t
O ? _ J
O r - . I-
a
T711 L
OW ,. ? ? )_? W I
m
3 I
z -- In
1 i
?.. O 1
I I ? ul.`IM - ? •y I
n n? I
- ?O N Q?' III I
a
?I Ik wE?tl'? u
O.?
I ?v MO
O N 0.:•
II ,I _ I ? I J`u ?
I'I I? ! ?? I I I I a
ill! i III
??? ?IIII ? ?I
w III III „c ,
I t,'II?I
m•I
III ,I II t I
:L!
II; ? 1
I II (II
III IM e
I?i I 1
=I-
I
II
I'
I
II i
II
`=J
IJ-t
II I
II
II I
II I
r
m
II
? J
5s, S
v c., '+ 1
I ':1
X N 'aLX (¢Y •uJ I j
i
J W I ;.
a _
frr tJ?,` 0
?IV V ?
,? -'? x x---x- -
2 r-L ,
LL
T -
-_l
x- ; we x_ _-,
- i I
J V ty 1 I
I ? W J --
' ,I I Oa Q0 ?? ;. f ;J
>-.. 1. 1 Y f i-
-i!`OZf -I-lVJ :ili'NQ ?_•p. r
C ?11 In a_,ys J ?1 1
J
-x
.. rF? - O W ^? yl
s rX. J
Yni. ? , J:I C'11 ,l HL X
S 5 ? ? Y. I
J -
L
1' -..1 U
;- u
Tt _..Y?? 13 r1tl, XtJV_Ilx? - 1.

J
-sA- Isrr as
'LIO !!3/iN30
? RN
?
T R I
10

?a
N
qq
I8 pIN
?
-u- s.tr as
Nl1FI Slf31NRH
$ NIN
Q
N
?
O
I
J p
? N
N
I I
I I!LI
_ I IIII
IT? I i I j
.q1I ? I I
ly P ':
II
J l•-
- --icw I` _a
I . ; ?
I $Ir;?
;

;.3 1
Q. A,? O IID
II s „
3
j
y$?I o r.
T
1

Q• ?r

n

WON 13314S 333
-7- 09496'VIS 3Nn Njim
1.e? v
14 ?
^ -d3'pl3J1M3)I'I3Vh O., GlYN 02J
•53 ?VH AvNo
Z r 41Atl0 Ti
Z J13 F: 't r ti I j - r +g :i I
C ?$ 1 I
z W W
?ff t : I + s °,rS:,. , , M ? X t
ma ?( Z 8£0+86 '0 Sl
! , - I it g t` 11tt I
0 O W
G'<?' W8 fr Un < gg g S[ 'sz ?? og _ x r j
w C. t ': °•. +" g _ II I 17:W+a ,I wl rL 1 I
o III b}°` - ct?y - Emr +'" I' q _- 7 t5 1 ?,
u
? ;
O ?Y- "' =v,o Q8O8tu I' C I 'c - 8" ? ?L L j
TflE AC?d
?? '?I _.-
?) 301 ] 6 .1. _ [` ]? w :5?'- _I f t i.. s { r 1
75°D' g+ 11 t,
Q- s 1,.,:. ?g`8 + 1 u it u p $$ `^ ,.' ;, S.
orno 88 g 1 i„ I Z r 1 - 1 \
fi W
g ? w I . II C? ! - w a °z i1 ' ?'7 bb:
Ili w3 ?' '}
2 i
o{oN '.? II ? ? ?
W III °
I ? I:. I a W +? ? .?
N $ S \
17
vWi? [ I sl
N I : N o
Y ? a m 9 " - o
1. A
00
1-m' I ?' ,D l ,.7 II I I < of
0°i? t, I i L J Z
Q ?Y?7 m .-''.:f aW II II.?o nn ?Jw i?? } \-
Nay re
ri \
b
m f I lir I I s i A,E r?,J
1t
I I _ k
Nw W I
1 p
t
? ? 8?G O 8 pg + it
!SL O O.D o00 +n?N+ I? D I 'I 1Ip ? ? t
I<'mP a ? '? za +?- ? u 1 1l I I ,^ct " - -L--I ?
< [? J ? Iu I' III ' I I•`1.°j:Y., t:
2 ?, 3 J W 14? III I ? j ???t-1j { ? O - t •,
u I r f o.?,
OU I . '> j6d ..?xi
<u I l', I I I'I'• tii :If Ollz"? ?y
? mod d I j I I •? - -?
I /
06 mw^° w I? I I 1 I H, E
.G _ vii - _I:,+.o` In ?f I y!: I rA""? - OI a W .m !?
,? Y I 1 'I j -? I c
u
n _ 4 v'j' I I' ? }c
°, ...i a `' t ?' `' z i i •:' > [? {, I ? ** _ _ X_ :'1 ? ' ? _ _
m ,/ I •f/ r IIy>,• I r.
=.ir?,ll
yV '1
n
?•,; .PI . {vL, II ICI 0'3
i G
N? I
1

h
p
CA pp
o I Q
b N
-GA- 06f1 !JS
'3AV awm[s3a? ,
GI? N ?
QN
?q
8N
C 1
I
N
]

? '^- O ,y J ? i ? N W I N
l
J

a

o?
^ j z,.

m
I
l
au
.
I
I I
W

'l

.

'
:: ` o ;: 1 1 1 1 0
? I
?
' l I
-. I

?
? N,:,
O?
u
ZL,? O
'•._? --__ __ I I
Iii II iI I w ? V

L W .
m
6'ON 133NS 33S
-7- 00+S9'V 1S 3617 NOlvn
cn "?
? ZN

Z

`

d

Z

• O1?
N
M ? c
11 n j m
(

?
?J
as L
d
W I• 10
CZ,?
x C ? ZION 133HS 33S Lva
3Nn Ho
z w V, 00+III'V1S

Q2 y v.
?a
Qz
&
I
U
? Z
6P I ; Y 1_ I a? .c r 1 o w 888 0..
C R. III?oI 1 -? :? I,_J m$ 8,:, ?d' * `PDE 'y mN, I• o ;3
+C
e{ IIII'?VPi, II .Y .?. N +y?•O-_ _. ?•- 1? _i , '.,w68
a8 UMU I .. O
e I<JU O?
'II O?? `,I.' J'.. , &oQ i Y ? '1 f ly f I ON O;4 i [ 3Q -? 1-•

C
h

C IN plA
ry N N m
? -0/A- 2Cl aS
'3/1V )IXN33a9
u3 ? QI?

I O p
I 3.. ?+ V, .y 1 1? 2,1 ? d I N O ,. u Q
?§ .r I e• ?. I I - o. c `r', ow¢LL / ,:1¢wo Q c ?a ?m ? wa;-'?
c?wo
I z r,O 8" • ti w I I zS I v °? ' o av
O J W
? R (Ml 011 O 19 . 1 SIT 11 1 I W 0y all
p ???SSfp ?`'t{ 1 '._i ?. +.? I I 1 4 ?y * 4 ° Ji ZZr.
`l 41 ??' ?< I w I II 7?I ' 9 N
Wv , Op VN I ` 111 ZA1, I w'1^$'
41`-'1 (pq 1 u a -_? \\• c „': I ?•-.
I N h 0 0? 1 ? .F:.
I?
ID b N e40 )l )L , L.- 1 t>r; ti (. .. 1 rrl.. I ' to h l z 1 r e.'
h q II II II " N `? ! Il r It > T -c:=ii1 r, _ J !1 r.?..: 08 in4 J:? I E _, - O 4eLii aj
1`?` d' N ,111 w u I^ III'
}, WWr? I K } ?J?j1 1 ?? 1111 ON V -? , / i ?' v/II"II11W
?y w l>,.I W ",' r^;iJ l.t? 1 ?'^ II i' 1 g a=°? f rl, -, QQ ?QOJI??vI
1"Ol MI'.? N 0 ?' - i 0=.. t,_-?? ' 8813 1 x LP 111';1',.2 1 wuuu i•; ?? - O
$i??Q4 W W .''' u ? '. 8 i8 ? 11 II A `. 1 1$ ? o ?'•-•
h II ? ? F,dd'V,
? I ;3l g w I M I h. I C1f?M ti.. _ ,CSC '..I' 1 I? ? o
yr ?' C? 8 a r?111 y1 GI? - t? O 1\ 1 r• d -
S? W l .`+nf?M•.'1 I 11 ??? F- ?- C ?,c. W I ? I / r? /
61'00+lAI o1S1 + o: r? 1 u s' I I I b e 8 t a/"?" Z'! a
Z
o
N
o°
I IIlllu I III I /,1., 2 - a ?\{ d3 / ! °S °
x t I I ° ?. m .P
z x t E a? ?d`y m>p
c J \
-_ .,•a'z ? ) y '" e?-? Y .1 II I Sri .. $7 d • d g ? ( \\ \?' ?'' `
.a ? O? =1_g8o J ', 11pp'. ? ? 1} 411 0$00. ,.41W, 0 0 r.
6. Fa.13+00-0
.s - N \J1.L IOa?•? ° IIII I $ Zf 1 ?:.:,? PYI''. .
_r my IU 01'1, ?I $ ^ x'. } 411 _
1R 1 +? U $ ?, .I II
w Jaa i:l 1?0 $$R$ 1:- L L'+1 II: ,??+ x'1,1 0 13+50-0
A 4 1 I 4 S ?./ `Qv) t\7 T t
? _
--
?+ N I ; ? I IL+V . ? < ' a
$ 'i R f I{
s N 501 / d y3 -
3
D1 O (. p J
yL06+601 •"ISSO --
t o ' 1 4 + ? Y - ? 1 1 11 1 8 - - CJ 11 11, r. \ ::
` E?/- es 1 ' +?J Vi
i 1 ` / ,I ly 1
Y58S E_ = 11; I v
_ t •?q/1 11j? I f ?i Oimrr,
2 u1 ¢ m
J?? ? ? r0? r ? F?,=• y id i, Yl. ?V Q $l l .1 I iI? r •L'4?'P ?'? ?1'-II rSj
_ ? ? ? 0o ?(O} ??W ul ? `?Y?• r1 ,.+riIr I 111 ?' W g ry+$C? ? o?LL 1 131 ? i
O? } ??-•,,. Ii' niz `m'?i. 8 }'- I `il X11®Y `.f 1
2W "` wd ci0 8g' SI I w I g8 1`x G ,
C9 S`V?, vaivwi N o;a +?*,I jI [+ III.' +? I r C- j I I _1.1,.
FAIL
O =LL Na ' 1 I i I W, } j 1
O;? WRw 1 11 ? I - ?? ?,I L , ,I Ji X -7 I
Jd - -MA I "rr r.I l?
?I i i 3 1 $ z j 1,
` J •1 d N` I M M
J i Ypl
k- it :?? 1( Z
w - / w? y 1 en:t
,7-
b1S ''?S a30 ??;y(? s of `
091,
86" .r 9a'Jd? V
I_I' x'11'.1°3r
C
z Z
lu N
` mZ
M z

Z
W L
Q=
a
U1
C z
F
z Q
J
O C
Z z 7' „ W ?
m a s Q Z
0
G J <3
W w
a ?
a s ?qa
2
/ z
o c
N ?
Zl c
J <? J k
N t ul a? ?-
,.?a
25
3LL j a??L?i??O°?iig?°
itz?`a"? n n ?"??"? `O u u
'?u u u 11 IIOW .u u 11 u u VI4 a II u u
r
00 (DO
\ m
y?
\` m

/ -7
N N N ? m
`??Q? go E$ N3' W m 15' P
p0?, .l
?•:'N II II II II '?` mN ?i`
- ---- -- ------
III II ..II II II W n.%taW 4?Yw„ W •'{.
o` n N ?
El h V110.R Q H
Q. &W ?.g r.
'I 'I Lo
V N llyll 11 4 O? omT
W m
`b'Z LL. j a. 6 ?3 h C?l ?-?
??a o s$ff i
2 Z Z Vf .{ I OZI ?_?' +Iz:::
III//
3 WOW 'y $ 1 N3
ZZZ2 111 +°°.
° C9?g+611'o159S 1
In Tn al ? + ?
O '' W 11
E v
4b ON ~ ??' ?' 0
? t
Q 1
? x- °$1 is rs
udi
Nra- X u¢ -I ?? • m? 1
N`•X WV?-O IX IU..? cp NN
J > > =\m
ti O. T p3Q ?, p$ .?1
W.W
crw
o`n ?x
- 'QWO
1 $
Su I . ? W $ ?+$
3 1 1 O. ^$ ' ? 7
o
IRANSIiION .
O
_'
G E.°
?V 7r '01.5- L
' m
- B 3 51 I
N011I51 V2/1 SG - - rOO ''- -' ?.
b 3- l $$??
O l
+ + o<
Q R} a I I
I
o
. i
N r mNN a
511
o4o
N ?O
U

I
N
a
E ? Qw
C If ? ? dU /
O 8 r
gg NN
y n
+ °c e /
1
\ W uN

n C7 I ,, !' ? III
9615+6Z DlSld

4si cl4

S U I ? 1 X

Ozzl,
tt

n p N l?r; <D ;
I

N
o 41

? I ,?k ,/ s O
z Id
a ±-
? N
MZ?
I6a $nSOffyyi . / p a?.
I /`.. ?N ?..._ ___ WHIZ -.•+Sa
J
r/{ °•
) Y
Era 1 :3
aU Ca
80$$ ,bT
t % yLti ?S8 ANN " ? +g0 ? ^\I ???,
J +Sa <W 2 0$ l
t. ,,. cg W ?? irl
I a? t / + j ?dr
IN,

10
}IE S
3 wQ?3
g4
JWEUtU My I?
Qt op a ?1W- •?I
?/ ItC ?ON Na/? '..I
O ?t-,V( H W W
+~ ?F?IE3ad '. -' 8 ? 'I? g $ $ $ + ? / '• ? / i // ,'?? + JNO W LL
I W &g8

?ppI ^l
Al Oc 1
:
O J
+.p I W I c
W ?,:
I
o 8
.U? "1 im
s
I
+ a
'

8 C,
cS
^ u
°
G
$ $Il I
gl8 0l
=I8
//
J 1ti

!
1 7
7

W
3 [
b
E' o U _
o'z `.r

"w
Ir*.'? -
7' -d t
N
t 1 SI
s
? 5 ?'

?t o
;s 'd5 1 o'z r 8
I
_ I

l
?
I
nE8 +P
I I I 1 o$+?n
?
?
L 0 11 W+n
W
'
y
I
8$ 1 N
„ __
W 1
?I'
r
+I
? ?Cl I 1
14'
o ?
X
15

N

T
?
1
to V
++
„1 O + I
w
.-° 8 8. , 7 . >
s
h
w

a
+ o
u, $ <,f h NU LLa `m4 ?a?L Yy m ¢
$ ff t.\ ^U MI,, ¢o . J.-? • O Jy'i.X t 1 ° N
+$ oz r ??' F'z„?p I o amp :P J d +
U $$ WU „ _? Wj' ?ci.. N Way - N
/ / ? O +a W? i ? 41y N 3 ?av - J N
W J a ? °
Q ="
/ 40 3
S? n$h WW O
/ G?`? / .I r l I\
+?JN ?01 :I
nU U
CL:
dl$ m NQW
WSW
? IRa E 7
,j
l
I"_- J I
f I I ,. O a L
- U tL 4•
? < 1
J
>Ta?--? -I 5. a A I l X
- . , .? 1• •. -..
U O O
V^U/-Q rnti? Q+ Z ,
N do _ O o i / _t'^'
LLJ
'-Qmm WN _00 :Z
NKW O }ON m?0> Q t r.fly
Na?awm NU, > n?
WKWHNO to l--_
zap *.n?,'
m m J O
h W ? ,J
Q i ..r
J ?I O z ?; ? f y
r?J r? f XZ,I
1 ? O 1 U i
m I °00 0? ? ?` ? ? 10?
I+ i.? ? M, r nV F?q
° m O'__, t s , ooa
Lo 4-
o v N
aovw
`?C .n In
~ V? m J N a 4??
T28 {

O J s? i J J '
,.
in i7d ,
?µr
N 1f29j399'Ea

2" w
yi
e
?? wo

AIN--?-
'
o r? 8(
•
O
l
°
S r i + rti '
? 11 it ( $. ,..1

y n,?
tom. -
? ? .s.

. s -?J I
?v @ i

a
i I a'

Y`, ? I z

I
x, I
I
., .? o yx
1 $
'V15 N91dN1
3Nf1
° 00+ 111
II'ON 133N5 33S
1 `^ n
SIN a?

?? 0
??
,o
?
? rrle a
?
ezrr as ? .?a 1vrr+o
?10 Y& NAM /
i 81

-0Q a
M p

p v Flo
o N ?N
T J , t O

` wQ 'I
?!

o
)
om -I J a rn
j
O
(n
, z
Q at ?'
I `?
J
2 _

a .o

Quo

xx
v I O ?v:
J J ,.t
Q 4 J ?1
O _
_ of
O '
-o Ord
O O

z

RI O
C ? ? 1 e N
-IN- 1ZC1 h'S ?l
'3?V SSCNJNL4
Y lb ?
q
c?
K Q ?-IW

`N
p
N '
p
p

O C
_
W
M vv??
UK
?W
?? C/)
z mu
L a
_ ?o
a a C Z'LL
< Q.
?w zW wLn
s
°S
?i
a
®i ti5
.z QZn°
QEo
U

0
I
o ?
N
3 i,? •SpF, ? I ?
\I? ? N
K¢ ?N
x qqN I
N _
? Q
7 Q
??PO o
0 oS
\y• U U)
/1\ ?OVI
Z L I
I ?
N
s
O
CL
W
I
n W
)-
c.)
W Zt:
J ?I V)
U-
aN?
2 2 (n
W
?Zct:
Q
V
I
I,

n8
'?s, N try
8 ?v
8y oC
?qi 7-'N
W s ° `r h
J - ?
xf
I' I !r 'Y.r. ?tY ? O¢JW
L '
H '.
8 ty \ ,( J u / ?x
a
8
'fY
ra to
t YQp?F??
r
X r ?a ? T
V? ;? t) + j ' P? ?O
W P, s 8 ? y+ i ?. ? ? ,:
2 M QdtS r'
6 am?•
W + , X11/ r
N
c ai +
O 1 J
N
S \
w ?
s8 ` a? a,+n
m m J ?\
W?? ?O#
tZi, ? { X O ?" V'
b/• N
? ??
M ?o ZLFBtLFI 'oISS? z :, r; S g ? `7 ?'`BF/!
$
?p
ton
gS a to W
ova ? ? ? 8 °?+$??o / ? •si
II II ?u w m W S ?, N °o
4 It
ti + - P6 s
7DF ...? ., n ?4
a S
RM MR to 4. 4- n vwiww zsa gOin .T4?. 3 gd
Ln &J (q
II
(n II II II II 0 w¢LL g g / wo - ,
Q: L'I'll
O?O w r cr .
88
+o / 1
4r ) " /
h , I it ?}
3 u 5f
LL¢ m I W I}? ? ,y ,.
w•? O -
Zr W I ? ?.. ?I , I' ?
L?nO { 'I I
m •i I Y r '
8628+FF1 'o1S?S W
JIZJaI? '
I
mU?I'? m
. i? s' I ' m a
i W o
)• li O O W I U C N K :?
t .y 4pq S: ' I O N N O?
S o t U'l
_ + yaj N M
v U
o \
a
0
d?o? I
7 v ? r
? o
?F <rbl - ? :, seo u
_??? y5 /Z SI a OS,;SI
/ r i t X?L -1 IT-
Off

m ,2

No
n
F y
z
o
O c N o
?g ti S?" i?8g
? ?
O M ? V m? J TT W a
1'r ?' O

O:? mN f WW
O
a O K "? O
a ' o
S a O? ? Q.C O ?OrJ'
N r
U w N
ml? j O w
O +
N?N-N W? W
U K
i a ? a ?-'lam'
1 oIS.SNP
in- c',+
?= of _'1? Ij I
¢ ' - U S
m m J ?
i S r' a? m 4
------------------
y 1,3
S W I
I $ ? $ ? ? S6'LFt LZl 'o1S1S , > co
?NN
? ?_ 11 II 11 C II II II om •i'? +g ? "-' 1l' ?..^ t "I,
I X"
% 56'69+SZ/ 'olSS? ? I
a ? ? - .n° a ?,m o
a W
Z j y ®m? f ZV• ?? I.
Q d O z
O
\Ep,
a z ? ? jl
? ? zl ON 13.3NS 3?S
-7- 00f6Zl't 1S 3N17 'YolviN
1, s
a a?

$

Z
z
? i C Z

W
{? ?`
.•?
a? ?
1I
W I"
=Zn

O
zW
W?

W
.r r.
0 Zo
? ? E o

6?'
U
? O o3 W R
a .
fi?
M:
'
• •

W
r III'
' ,'
o?
w

h lai i O Jl
O r-
u_
I J OSI
A
.OR ?N? ? w
00
O'v7 O rOixr'
?1' ,'? lea 1`?I o ?•-? ? oS $8 ? v t ' ;S/5 ``r ': ?j?
s ,3? + !1Ma , ?, ?A
F- t, ' W 1. Ze ?O ?j
s ?8y e' ? a" LI it u II n
4? ? +? p 1 1 •? ? \1?+8,?gi\y\ J' ?11 ,,' N°_ ?F ?? 4m?v?
WW \
II .p}SS? ?? ? +n W G, +` S .?. SL \, ?, OW n'<Sn q + D Z u?y - m?§ ?
A -1. U Z
aow ?z OSr• `o` 1 ,: ? 'Q\ +.- -r=, ?j E0 ' / ?.? o+i `?j??J????
ua _ ?< it 'cr i ?p 'd -r ?1 w V?'MV?OjO
$
<o g n ?: oa to J u O m' o?to`??m
II
Our- e3 i 'xa „) » -+??? 9}i'1.,.. o ).. ,e N II II II II II W
?sJ?/dD 6?sd ?I$+a P 0) ..?`I\ /m '? ? ;\s 1s r' ? '?.1 t - -?\ ?.I? o
6o0'TRANS?ION (SHIFT) ¢ i
ry
mu o
E
0o N ?s_p + ?rr0? n? "l a
F 36'
f77 :7177!7_77
-7
s a 2'-6'C8;
LLJ ii 7Y/4
.r?S 7t=d 45,9 - I
--7`'.'1''fAPER-- - ----- -- 774 77._,?v ` Cd: ?4 L.-..T..c,? ?•_ - IPA 440'FULL STOR =(R21 T Z
v l_ s --- _ A'Pa ELl ?A - 330'FULL STORAGE
- ----- ?? v,v: `di `. _ ?? 5'MONO.CONC.)5L W
Y
??? -Yl4NBL- ..:a sssT :_> N +?? ?? x
o ? -Y14N8L- ?
N
_ _ _ _N 72 20 45.9 E ?.? - - N 72' 2d 45.9E 2 W
Fud
w4'PAVfO SH 5 -3AOtY32! 2'-6'C ?_",?, q ,? ,.• _:.".2`CaG -j 'r- Z
SHLDR
00
h ?y . ?S' ? I\ ? ,.'• I I ` `rt+? a I? ICI-/ ;'•t z ? ? m `_? iz0 - ? ? ? / ? ?? _? 1?1 I ? ?° ''o ??
Q ? I i - ? r I ? ? 8 _ - ?_' m. ? 1 '1 Ti$? ?o? Z 8$
8+L5w1 _..u ;v?ea Ir-+r?' ?? I I ..J I 1 ' + `. . Z t r V O`d t, +?
..:2 WV.(ICGa34 _III? ??Z ITI I- .c.FI. __Irl n? ..1 ?\'' Y ti? '? 1 : • W?, •
OII? OY ao ~4? io??g=°?ci? I? I ITI?.. I E+, ? z I ? 40 •' - z ?? I?tv
r U? W9 Nab + ' g8l_? I i g' 3 7 I tP I _' s +$
?? WaLL g +? - ''+? ?, = 4 a Eg
a 0 - _ ?- J- I o p 1
W i NLLO oaO ` JI 8??6 8 a I y? • 'I`' I??. - J
I n
li - O a
c^n I o
7 4,,
lk-
Z 0. i? I R o m m `= m PDT, x of ,n
\ O¢ 2. 1 = a U H U 0 0
V U m ( I sl S aD
W y $+$ Q, ;-.7
p 8
y`LlI Z? Z I 888 +,°p8 mom" '"'KW i
??2 LL ,J W i +$$ KWW y~jdJ ,
`l J mV10 WKl1
o?Lj_
h L;y
J nd 0J*
® r I
__
Q.
6
,

I
1
LQ
? o
? W :?•
_
I
8 8
?
;
7
O? I ?

? g
aN?a$ I sL+
`? I
1W

f'• ti I
2 2 2 in
L
L
8 Z
8d
I + O
a
h
O
R 2
h ro

? ?
p o
RJR,
I
N N N
-61A- lOb SR -b/A- lOb $R
'Calaao33va oa oao-43va
' ?
8 N
A
I
Ci., I
mN

Z Z Z?

WWW I I W $g •=? o
F

O 1 ¢
i W rm J "

Y; ? SZl 5Z = ? a

` 0 I
8

m
??
Q
m
I I $
? ?
°
im N
+ N U U
.
a; I SI
Il +

GIN , .. l .S Z?
00 it G0+

M

` I I Z
,`( J W U I C U Li
.T
.

H
Z O
o O"

?' O r
:'Yw ; I
C 0 W
Y

? d
hW- W In
L 2 6
/ LL a ,,,
zz ;?
i I $$

O o
¢w? '?
? u ` ? fl-ON 133H5 33S
w - LS 3Nn Hum
-V

7-
_
_
00+8£1 p 1

G
?°
g z
r Lo
.
47 uiP
o ar
ag
C Z?
G .
,

Z o '
OAF
C
g
0 ?
7a UJ Z ?
0
Et
orq

>L o

d
z
Lo
O
4
I
I h lj
L
_ NNN
VI
2Z:0 \
N N
u.
z-
o?; r
1
h
091
?'11!r
•.on o?r r 'a?: a
? t
J a N
z
~ ! ?? a
f-
V J
fiai _
?.4
wa? ?
ac',p -
\\ w:• I?
N
a? a
N
• F
95l „- -
C
0 ? 2S
? ? 8F
N O ??
aLL
z Oc
989E+ZSI 'oJS-LS
N LL J .,
z
o ow'LL
?

N -

OW'
LL
61'00 13314S 33S
-7- 00+0S1'b'1S 3017 Hild/Y
J
4
r =

W-
l

J ro
°
__ J

L
I_. ??.
Lam'"r
i r. w °-. cr
a'n

0
,E
2
III:
y I I'
?s1 - wi
r; ;;
`
I

?i Illi ? °
?
•
o
'
m

Z
? U rc
o °z
Z ?
Zcc "
w ? ? pw
G I 33
Z)
0
g
??oW
J J ?
3 W
?4?N
oO O
N N N
Q
? to N,
C zno
[n NVa
z , sl• z P
J f-?a
Q ? /? -1 M tL
n it LQ ?
'c JN
oel rl
? So
a0Eo
wq FU??
I
P
80
N r2
? v
?W
W V)
?W
Q
1--?? I:• Y. r.
,ory .oY o s
so of ?O? y?y
b
' a
awe
H v,' N N
0 - N
anal
t'
? O
I?oa `r9 H
J?? J
asP .._? a o
Y ?
r
O
2
x,L > om
O
O
O N
O v
? N
O m k'?'
FIO
_ °IN
g_-"
n II
mij
i uI'q
C
1 0a<
J a
n
n -Mai
Nab
w¢w
I ?
- -- - - -- _ _ ----- -ter - - -
-Yl4SBL- N 72'20'45.0'E Z
N 72' 20'45D' E
TRANS 1 ON

•L I

m g?
N77 Iz 00.3'E
ryg sa rAFUf d
{
?

W
:3 LLJ
77 N
Z
in,

?r it
I I _ J._ U U. Z?
JK-
1
X r^ I w 5 w m? u
1 .'.I

Administrative Action
Environmental Assessment
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Submitted pursuant to 42 U. S. C. 4332(2)(C)
Date
A L%
Date

Fayetteville
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
US 401 to the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass,
Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project Number STP-1141(7)
State Project Number 8.2442901
TIP Project U-3311
J -J C; i

V1E1UN'DSG:-?0' P.
t"'°iTEE< (?41fIM SECT ' .
William D. Gilmore, P. E., Manager,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
Nicholas L. Graf
?` Division Administrator, FHWA

r
Fayetteville
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
US 401 to the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass,
Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project Number STP-1141(7)
State Project Number 8.2442901
TIP Project U-3311
Environmental Assessment
April 2000
Documentation Prepared in Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch By:
/!? 4 7 o O
Craig oung `
Project Development ngineer
C,?,, -1]? +Z a, 7 Id 0
Eric Midkiff, P.E.
Project Development Unit Head
Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
?H CAROI/'%
•n? ` i
•
SEAL
19791 -
?I ••.. o. ?? ./?(C yew
lR,C it 1M ,D %%%%S?
SUMMARY
Environmental Assessment
Prepared by
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
in Consultation with
Federal Highway Administration
1. Type of Action
This is a Federal Highway Administration Action, Environmental Assessment.
2. Additional Information
The following persons can be contacted for additional information:
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator-FHWA
U.S. Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, N. C. 27601-1442
Telephone [phone]
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611 Telephone [phone]

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
From the SR 1107 (Fisher Road)
To US 401 Business (Raeford Road)
Fayetteville, Cumberland County
Federal-Aid No. STP-1141(7), State Project No. 8.2442901
T.I.P. No. U-3311
Commitments Developed Through Project Development and Design
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit 423 Conditions, the General Nationwide
Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency
Certification, the following special commitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
Roadway Design Unit
NCDOT will provide 4.2 in (14 ft) outside lanes and 3.6 m (12 ft) inside lanes to
accommodate bicycle traffic along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive).
Hydraulic Design: Unit
Cumberland County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program.
The crossing of Beaver Creek Tributary A is in a designated flood hazard zone and is
included in a detailed flood study, with an established floodway and corresponding
regulatory water surface elevations. It is anticipated that the new crossing will require a
flood way modification. The Hydraulics Design Unit of NCDOT will coordinate with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency and local authorities in the final hydraulics
design stage regarding the floodway modification and to ensure compliance with
applicable floodplain ordinances
Environmental Assessment Page 1 of 1
April 31, 2000
4. Description of Action
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen SR
1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass at
SR 1107 (Fisher Road) in Cumberland County (see Figure 1). Estimated project length is
2.7 miles (4.3 kilometers).
• The project is included in the North Carolina Department of Transportation's 2000-
2006 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and is scheduled for right of way
acquisition to begin in fiscal year 2005 and construction to begin in fiscal year 2006.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to widen SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from US 401 (Raeford Road) to SR 1007 (Fisher
Road) including a section on new location between SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive) and US
401 (Raeford Road). The project's location is shown on the vicinity map included as
Figure 1. The proposed improvements to SR 1141 are described in more detail in Section
II of this report.
The total cost of the improvements recommended in this document is $14,673,000,
which includes $11,800,000 for construction and $2,873,000 for right of way acquisition.
The 2000-2006 TIP includes a total funding for this project of $10,750,000 which includes
$7,950,000 for construction and $2,800,000 for right of way acquisition.
5. Summary of Beneficial and Adverse Environmental Impacts
This project will help relieve congestion resulting from growth along the southern
portion of Bingham Drive and west of this corridor. It will also reduce the accident
potential along Bingham Drive. Together with TIP Project U-620 (Hope Mills Bypass)
and TIP Project U-3424 (Bunce Road), Bingham Drive will become a crucial part of an
envisioned north-south arterial between Cliffdale Road (SR 1400), just east of its
interchange with the Fayetteville Outer Loop, and US 301/1-95 Business.
The proposed project is one element of a system-wide thoroughfare plan that
provides circumferential travel between suburban growth areas and is consistent with local
land use plans. In conjunction with Bunce Road to the north and the proposed Hope Mills
Bypass to the south, Bingham Drive will provide a southwestern looping facility that
allows developing areas direct access to I-95 Business and Fort Bragg. By connecting
existing radial facilities (Cumberland Road, Camden Road, Legion Road, US 401
Business, and I-95 Business), this project, in conjunction with TIP Project U-3424 and TIP
Project U-620, will reduce the need for circuitous travel in southwestern Cumberland
County.
In addition, the proposed alignment will remove traffic from the highly congested
Brentwood Elementary School area, providing a safer environment for young school
children.
Wetland impacts will be avoided by spanning the identified wetland area near SR
3328 (Mary Kirk Drive) with a bridge. Three residential relocations and one business
relocation will occur as a result of the proposed project.
The following table shows the predicted maximum extent of the 72 and 67 dBA
noise level contours, the maximum predicted noise levels, and the approximate number of
impacted receptors along the project.

Maximum
Predicted Leq Contour Approximate Number of
Noise levels Distance Impacted Receptors According
DBA (Maximum) to Title 23 CFR Part 772
72 67
Description 15m 30m 60m dBA dBA A B C D E
Alt. I
From US New Location 69.6 65.8 60.3 15.5 31.3 0 6 1 0 0
401 to (Recommended)
Marykirk
Rd.
Alt. 2
Existing 69.6 65.8 60.3 15.5 31.3 0 30 0 0 0
Bingham Drive
Symmetrical 70.4 66.3 60.8 16.8 33.8 0 44 0 0 0
From widening
Marykirk East Side 70.4 66.3 60.8 16.8 33.8 0 47 0 0 0
Rd. to widening
Bailey
Lake Rd. West Side 70.4 66.3 60.8 16.8 33.8 0 42 0 0 0
widening
Symmetrical 70.1 65.9 60.4 15.9 32 2 0 43 0 0 0
From widening

Bailey
Lake Rd. East Side 7-IT 65.9 60.4 15.9 32.2 0 32 2 0 0
to Fisher widening

Road
F west side
70.1
65.9
60.4
159
32.2
0
39
1
0
0
widening
Note: 1. Maximum predicted Leq noise levels are measured from the center of the near traffic lane.
2. 72 dBA and 67 dBA contour distances are measured from center of proposed roadway
This information should assist local authorities in exercising land use control over
the remaining undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within local jurisdiction. For
example, with the proper information on noise, local authorities can prevent further
development of incompatible activities and land uses with the predicted noise levels of an
adjacent highway.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the Federal/State
governments are no longer responsible for providing noise abatement measures for new
development for which building permits are issued within the noise impact area of a
proposed highway after the Date of Public Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of
the location of a proposed highway project will be the approval date of CEs, FONSIs,
RODs, or the Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For development occurring
after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are responsible for insuring that
noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility.
6. Alternatives Considered
Alternate Modes of Transportation
The primary mode of transportation in and around Fayetteville is the automobile.
The City of Fayetteville does not provide bus, vanpooling, or carpooling services in
the vicinity of the project. Trip origins and destinations are widespread in this area
and public transportation alternatives would not provide the improved access
between southwestern and northwestern Cumberland County. Alternatives to the
automobile would not: provide a direct north-south route from Hope Mills to Fort
Bragg on the north west side of Fayetteville; nor would it substantially or
economically serve to alleviate congestion and improve safety along SR 1141
(Bingham Drive). Therefore, providing an alternate mode of transportation other
than the automobile would not serve to meet the purpose and need of the project.
No-Build Alternative - Although this alternative would avoid any adverse
environmental impacts that would result from the project, it does not satisfy
the purpose and need of the project. There would be no positive effect on
the traffic capacity of roadways in the area or improvements in traffic
safety. For these reasons, this alternative is not recommended.
Alternative 1 (Recommended) - The typical section for this alternative
includes a combination of a four-lane divided section with a raised grassed-
median and a five-lane undivided section. Bingham Drive will be widened
utilizing a "best-fit" method that includes symmetrical, East Side, and West
Side widening, thereby minimizing impacts to existing properties located
along the project. Under this alternative, existing Bingham Drive from SR
1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bihar Road) would be widened to a 4-lane,
median divided section. From SR 3697 (Bibar Road) to SR 1340
(Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be widened to a 5-lane,
undivided, curb and gutter section. From Crestwood Avenue to SR 3328
(Mary Kirk Drive), Bingham Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, divided
section with a grass median. From Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a 4-lane,
divided section with a grassed median would be constructed on new
location to connect Bingham Drive with US 401 at Bunce Road. Wetlands,
associated with the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek will be bridged
under this alternative.
Alternative 2 - Alternative 2 proposes to widen Bingham Drive to a
combination of a four-lane divided section with a raised grassed-median
and a five-lane undivided section. A combination of symmetrical and
asymmetrical widening would be used to minimize impacts to existing
properties along Bingham Drive. Under this alternative, existing Bingham
Drive, from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), would be
widened to a 4-lane, median divided section. From SR 3697 (Bibar Road)
to SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be widened to a S-
lane, undivided, curb and gutter section. Alternative 2 is identical to
Alternative 1 for the section of Bingham Drive from Fisher Road to
Crestwood Avenue. From Crestwood Avenue to SR 3328 (Mary Kirk
Drive), both a 5-lane, undivided section and a 4-lane, median divided
section were studied. Due to the numerous driveways in this section, it was
determined that a five-lane curb and gutter section would better suit the
required needs of this portion of Bingham Drive. From Mary Kirk Drive to
US 401, a 5-lane, undivided curb and gutter section would be constructed
along the existing alignment of Bingham Drive. The need for
improvements to US 401, from the US 401 / Bingham Drive intersection to
the US 401 / Bunce Road intersection, was also evaluated under this
alternative. In order to maintain an acceptable LOS on US 401 Business,
additional westbound through lanes would be needed between Bingham
Drive and Bunce Road to handle the additional projected traffic volumes in
the design year 2020.
Alternative 3 - Alternative 3 is similar to Alternative 2 in that it proposes to
widen Bingham Drive along existing alignment from Fisher Road to US
401 Business. From the intersection at US 401 Business northward, a
facility on new location would be constructed that would tie into existing
Bunce Road north of its intersection with US 401 Business. This alternative
would basically result in the realignment of Bunce Road to the east.
Environmental field studies conducted for this alternative concluded that
extreme impacts to existing wetlands and streams would result if this
alternative were built. After reviewing the proposed project area north of
US 401 Business, it was determined that the only feasible location for the
new location of this alternative would either involve unreasonable impacts
to existing residences or to existing wetlands. For this reason this
Alternative 3 was dropped from further study.
Postponement Alternative
Construction of the proposed route will provide a more direct north-south corridor
and reduce travel time between Hope Mills and Northern Cumberland County.
Postponement of this project is not recommended since the anticipated growth in
traffic demand will lower the level-of-service of existing SR 1141 (Bingham
Drive), SR 1411 (Bunce Road), and US 401 (Raeford Road). This would lead to
higher operating costs, increased delays, and reduction in safety.
Typical Section Alternatives
Two typical cross sections were evaluated for this project: a four-lane median
divided section and a five-lane undivided section. The four-lane divided section
would consist of two pavements with curb and gutter (each measuring 28.75 feet,
or 8.625m, between the curb faces) divided by a 16 foot (4.8 meter) raised grassed
median (See Figure 5A). The five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section would
measure 68 feet (20.7 m) between the curb faces with a 12 foot (3.6 meter)
continuous middle turn lane and 14 foot (4.2 m) outside lanes (See Figure 513). A
combination of these two typical sections is proposed for this project in order to
reduce overall residential and commercial property impacts and environmental
p impacts, while at the same time increasing the safety and traffic carrying capacity
of the facility.
7. Permits
Impacts to wetlands are anticipated from project construction. In accordance with
provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit will be required from the COE
for discharge of dredge or fill material into "Waters of the United States." Due to wetland
and surface water impacts, a Section 404 Nationwide 14 Permit will likely be necessary for
this project.
This project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to
the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the CWA requires that the state
issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may
result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. The issuance of a 401 permit from the
DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
8. Coordination
The following federal, state and local agencies and officials were consulted
regarding this project:
U.S. Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers)
U.S. Department of Agriculture (Soil Conservation Service)
U.S. Department of the Interior (Fish and Wildlife Service)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Emergency Management Administration
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
N.C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Fayetteville Area MPO
City of Fayetteville
Fayetteville City Council
Cumberland County Commissioners
TABLE OF CONTENTS
y SUMMARY PAGE
1. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT ..........................................................1
A. General Description of Project .................................................................................... I
B. Purpose of the Project .............................................................................................: 1
C. Characteristics of Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 2
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied ....................................................................... 2
2. Route Classification ................................................................................................ 2
3. Existing Cross-Section ............................................................................................ 2
4. Existing Right of Way ............................................................................................ 2
5. Access Control ........................................................................................................ 2
6. Speed Limits ........................................................................................................... 2
7. Bridges and Drainage Structures ............................................................................ 3
8. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature .......................................................................... 3
9. Intersecting Roads ................................................................................................... 3
10. Project Terminals .................................................................................................... 3
11. Degree of Roadside Interference ............................................................................ 3
12. School Bus Data ...................................................................................................... 4
13. Parking .................................................................................................................... 4
14. Utilities .................................................................................................................... 4
15. Airports ................................................................................................................... 4
16. Geodetic Markers .................................................................................................... 4
17. Railroads ................................................................................................................. 4
18. Bicycle Accommodations ....................................................................................... 4
19. Sidewalks ................................................................................................................ 5
i D. Traffic Volumes and Capacity Analysis ......................................................................5
1. Mainline Analysis ...................................................................................................5
Intersection Analysis ...............................................................................................5
2.
' E. Thoroughfare Plan .......................................................................................................6
F. Accident Data and Analysis ........................................................................................6
G. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Project Area .....................................7
H. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community ...........................................................8
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................ 9
A. Typical Section Description ...................................................................................... ..9
B. Length of Project ....................................................................................................... ..9
C. Right of Way ............................................................................................................. ..9
D. Design Speed ............................................................................................................. ..9
E. Intersection Treatment and Type of Control ............................................................. ..9
F. Bridges and Drainage Structures ............................................................................... 10
G. Sidewalks ................................................................................................................... 10
H. Bicycle Accommodations .......................................................................................... I l
1. Greenways ................................................................................................................. 11
J. Special Permits Required .......................................................................................... 11
K. Noise Barriers ............................................................................................................ I l
L. Anticipated Design Exceptions ................................................................................. 12
M. Cost Estimates ........................................................................................................... 12

0
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ..........................................13
A. Alternate Modes of Transportation ...........................................................................13
B. No Build Alternative .................................................................................................13
C. Postponement Alternative .........................................................................................13
D. Recommended Alternative ........................................................................................13
E. Design Alternatives ...................................................................................................14
1. Typical Section Alternatives .................................................................................14
2. Alignment Alternatives .........................................................................................14
F. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................17
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS .........................18
A. Social Effects .............................................................................................................18
1. Land Use ...............................................................................................................18
Neighborhood Characteristics ...............................................................................19
3. Relocations ............................................................................................................21
4. Public Facilities .....................................................................................................21
5. Social Impacts .......................................................................................................21
6. Title VI and Environmental Justice ......................................................................22
7. Historic and Cultural Resources ...........................................................................23
............................................................................................
8. Section 4(f) Resources
B. Economic Effects ......................................................................................................24
1. Income Measures and Persons Living Below the Poverty Level .........................24
2. Business Activity/Employment Centers ...............................................................24
3. Secondary/Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................24
C. Environmental Effects ...............................................................................................24
1. Methodology ......................................................................................................... 25
2. Physical Characteristics ........................................................................................ 26
3. Water Resources ................................................................................................... 28
4. Biotic Resources ................................................................................................... 31
5. Terrestrial Communities ....................................................................................... 31
6. Faunal Component ................................................................................................ 34
7. Aquatic Communities ........................................................................................... 35
8. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Resources .............................................................. 36
9. Jurisdictional Issues .............................................................................................. 38
10. Waters of the United States ................................................................................... 38
11. Protected and Rare Species ................................................................................... 43
12. Flood Hazard Evaluation ...................................................................................... 49
13. Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 50
14. Highway Traffic Noise/Construction Noise Analysis .......................................... 50
15. Air Quality Analysis ............................................................................................. 55
16 Hazardous Materials and UST Involvement ......................................................... 58
17. Construction Impacts ............................................................................................ 58
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION .........................:.................................... 61
A. Comments Received from Federal, State, and Local Agencies ................................61
B. Citizens Informational Workshop .............................................................................61
C. Public Hearing ...........................................................................................................62
TABLES
Page
Table 1 - Mainline Capacity Analysis ......................................................... 5
Table 2 - Levels of Service For Major Intersections ................................... 6
Table 3 - Accident Rates .............................................................................. 7
Table 4 - Design Alternatives ...................................................................... 17
Table 5 - Population By Race and Hispanic Origins ................................... 20
Table 6 - Population By Age (Cumberland County) ................................... 20
Table 7 - Persons Living Below Poverty Level (Cumberland County)....... 24
Table 8 - Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities ................................ 36
Table 9 - Anticipated Impacts to Wetlands & Surface Waters .................... 39
Table 10 - Federally Protected Species for Cumberland County ................ 43
Table 11 - Federal Species of Concern ........................................................ 48
MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Aerial Mosaic Showing Project
Figure 3 - Thoroughfare Plan
Figure 4 - Other TIP Projects in the Area
Figure 5A - 4-Lane Typical Section
Figure 513 - 5-Lane Typical Section
Figure 6A - Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 6B - Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 6C - Projected Traffic Volumes
Figure 6D - Projected Traffic Volumes
APPENDICES
Appendix 1- NCDOT Relocation Programs and Relocatee Reports
Appendix 2- Traffic Noise and Air Quality Analysis Tables and Figures
Appendix 3- Comments Received from Federal, State,
and Local Agencies
Appendix 4- Citizens Informational Workshop News Release
and Informational Handout
Fayetteville
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
US 401 to the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass,
Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project Number STP-1141(7)
State Project Number 8.2442901
TIP Project U-3311
NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. General Description of Project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen SR
1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass at
SR 1107 (Fisher Road), a distance of 4.3 km (2.7 miles) (see Figure 1). NCDOT includes
this project in the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and is scheduled
for right of way acquisition in fiscal year 2005 and construction to begin in fiscal year
2006.
B. Purpose of the Project
The purpose of this project is to alleviate congestion and improve safety along
Bingham Drive. Currently, between 11,400 and 18,000 vehicles per day are traveling
along Bingham Drive in the project vicinity. This is expected to increase to 22,200
vehicles per day (Alternative 1) and 25,800 vehicles per day (Alternative 2) by design year
(2020). This project will also relieve congestion resulting from growth along the southern
portion of Bingham Drive and west of this corridor, along with reducing the accident
potential along Bingham Drive.
Together with TIP Project U-620 (Hope Mills Bypass) and TIP Project U-3424
(Bunce Road), Bingham Drive will become a crucial part of an envisioned north-south
arterial between Cliffdale Road (SR 1400), just east of its interchange with the Fayetteville
Outer Loop, and US 301/I-95 Business.
The proposed project is one element of a system-wide thoroughfare plan that
provides circumferential travel between suburban growth areas and is consistent with local
land use plans. In conjunction with Bunce Road to the north and the proposed Hope Mills
Bypass to the south, Bingham Drive will provide a southwestern looping facility that
allows developing areas direct access to 1-95 Business and Fort Bragg. By connecting
existing radial facilities (Cumberland Road, Camden Road, Legion Road, US 401
Business, and 1-95 Business), this project, in conjunction with TIP Project U-3424 and TIP
Project U-620, will reduce the need for circuitous travel in southwestern Cumberland
County.
C. Characteristics of Existing Conditions
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied
The length of the proposed project, from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401
(Raeford Road), is 2.7 miles (4.3 km).
2. Route Classification
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) is classified as a minor urban arterial in the
North Carolina Functional Classification System.
Existing Cross-Section
From the southern terminal of the proposed project, SR 1107 (Fisher Road),
to SR 3673 (Pepperbush Drive), Bingham Drive is a 34 foot (10.2 meter), three-
lane, grass shoulder section. From SR 3673 (Pepperbush Drive) to SR 3697 (Bibar
Road), Bingham Drive transitions from a 34 foot (10.2 meter), three-lane, grass
shoulder section to a 24 foot (7.2 meter), two-lane, grass shoulder section. From
SR 3697 (Bibar Road) to the northern terminal at US 401 (Raeford Road),
Bingham Drive is a 24 foot (7.2 meter), two-lane, grass shoulder section.
At the northern project terminal, US 401 Business (Raeford Road) is a five-
lane, undivided, curb and gutter section measuring 64 feet (19.2 meters) between
the curb faces with a 12 foot (3.6 meter) continuous middle turn lane.
4. Existing Right of Way
The right of way varies from 60 to 80 feet (18 to 24 meters) within the
project limits.
5. Access Control
There is no control of access along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive).
6. Speed Limits
From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3673 (Pepperbush Drive) the posted
speed limit is 45 mph. From SR 3673 (Pepperbush Drive) to SR 3697 (Bibar
Road) the posted speed limit varies from 35 mph to 45 mph. From SR 3697 (Bibar
Road) to US 401 the posted speed limit is 35 mph.
7. Bridges and Drainage Structures
There is a corrugated metal pipe (CMP) located approximately 400 feet
north of SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Road) that carries an unnamed tributary for Beaver
Creek under SR 1141 (Bingham Drive).
8. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature
The horizontal curvature of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) consists mainly of
long tangent sections that traverse predominantly level terrain. The existing
horizontal curves that do exist along the project adhere with the current roadway
design standards and will remain intact after completion of the proposed
improvements. Because of the project's geographical location, the vertical
curvature varies little throughout the project, with the exception of a slight vertical
curve in the vicinity of the crossing of the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek,
located just south of the Aaran Lake Baptist Church.
9. Intersecting Roads
All intersections along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) are at grade. There are
two signalized intersections along the project, located at SR 1141/SR 1107 (Fisher
Road) and SR 1141/US 410 (Raeford Road).
10. Project Terminals
The northern project terminal is located at the intersection of SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) and US 401 (Raeford Road). This intersection is signalized. SR
1141 consists of a 36 foot (10.8 meter), three-lane, grass-shoulder section from the
intersection with US 401 to SR 3051 (Bingham Place).
The southern project terminal is located at the intersection of SR
1141(Bingham Drive) and SR 1107 (Fisher Road). This intersection is signalized.
SR 1141 consists of a 34 foot (10.2 meter), three-lane, grass shoulder section in the
vicinity of the southern terminal.
11. Degree of Roadside Interference
The degree of roadside interference is high along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
due to businesses and homes along both sides. The section from US 401 to SR
3697 (Bihar Road) is predominantly residential with several subdivision entrances
and driveways intersecting Bingham Drive. The remainder of the project is mainly
residential; however, houses are spaced much further apart and are set farther off
the road than in the previous section, and there are no subdivision entrances
connecting to Bingham Drive.
12. School Bus Data
The Cumberland County School Bus Transportation Director reported that
there are approximately 50 school buses a day that use Bingham Drive. The
intersection of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) and SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) serves
as the dividing boundary for two high school attendance areas, thus accounting for
the high number of buses traveling along Bingham Drive.
13. Parking
On street parking is not allowed within the project limits.
14. Utilities
The project contains both above ground and sub-surface utilities over the
entire length of the project. Power, telephone, and cable television are all carried
on utility poles, which shift, from one side of the existing road to the other over the
length of the project. A high-tension wire crosses Bingham Drive approximately
1000 feet north of the Cumberland Cemetery. The towers closest to Bingham
Drive are outside of the existing and proposed right of way and should not be
impacted by this project. Sub-surface utilities along the project consist of city
water service. The quantity of utility conflicts will be dictated by which side
Bingham Drive is widened on and in which locations. There are also underground
telephone cables located near the southern end of the project.
15. Airports
The Fayetteville Regional Airport is located on US 301 approximately 10
miles from the southern terminus of the project. The proposed project is not
expected to impact the Fayetteville Regional Airport.
16. Geodetic Markers
This project will have no impact on any existing geodetic survey markers.
17. Railroads
There are no railroads or rail corridors along this project.
18. Bicycle Accommodations
Bingham Drive is not a signed bicycle route and there are no provisions for
bicycle traffic along the proposed project. Bingham Drive is included in the City of
Fayetteville's Bike Route Plan and is shown as Route No. 13.
The 2000 - 2006 Transportation Improvement Program includes the
proposed project as an incidental bicycle and sidewalk project.
19. Sidewalks
There are currently no sidewalks located on the project. Field investigation
suggests pedestrian traffic along the project, evident by worn paths along the
shoulder of the road in various sections of Bingham Drive.
D. Traffic Volumes and Capacity Analysis
Mainline Analysis
Mainline capacity analyses were performed for SR 1141. Currently,
between 11,400 and 18,000 vehicles per day are traveling along Bingham Drive in
the project vicinity. This is expected to increase to 22,200 vehicles per day
(Alternative 1) and 25,800 vehicles per day (Alternative 2) by design year (2020).
The level of service (LOS) on Bingham Drive in the current year is D. If
improvements are not made to the existing road, the LOS in the year 2020 will
range from D to E along Bingham Drive. The LOS for Bingham Drive in the year
2020 will range from A to B if the recommended improvements are made (see
Table 1 below).
TABLE. I Mainline Capacity Analvsis
WITHOUT PROPOSED WITH PROPOSED
SECTION OF BINGHAM IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS
DRIVE
2000 LOS 2020 LOS 2020 LOS
SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to D D B
SR 3326 (Marykirk Road)
SR 3326 (Marykirk Rd.) to N/A N/A B
US 401- Alt. 1
Recommended
SR 3326 (Marykirk Rd.) to D E A
US 401- Alt. 2 (existing
Bingham Drive)
US 401 from existing C E E
Bingham Drive to Bunce
Road
2. Intersection Analvsis
Capacity analyses were also performed for the major intersections along the
project. The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 2. Each of these
intersections, except Bibar Road and Mary Kirk Drive, are presently signalized. A
new signal is proposed at both Bibar Road and Mary Kirk Drive.
TABLE 2. LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR MAJOR INTERSECTIONS
Intersection (E-W / N- 2000 Without 2020 Without 2020 With
S) Improvements Improvements Improvements
Fisher Road / Bingham C F B
Drive
Bihar Road / Bingham N/A N/A C
Drive
Mary Kirk Drive / N/A N/A C
Bingham Drive
Alt 1: F*
US 401 (Raeford Road) F F Alt 2: F*
/ Bingham Drive
Alt 1: F*
US 401 (Raeford Road) F F Alt 2: F*
/ Bunce Road
*NOTE: Traffic volumes along US 401 in the design year are estimated to range from
54,000 to 57,000 vehicles per day. Because of these high volumes, the intersections of US
401 with Bunce Road and existing Bingham Drive are predicted to have failing (LOS F)
levels of service. The dominant flow, and thereby, the controlling movement through
these two intersections are the eastbound and westbound flow along US 401. Regardless
of the turning movements from these two intersections, US 401 would still fail unless
additional through lanes were constructed along US 401, which is considered outside the
scope of this project (see Section II.E of this report for a detailed description of this
intersection configuration).
E. Thoroughfare Plan
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) is shown as a major thoroughfare on the Fayetteville
Urban Area Thoroughfare Plan which was adopted by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation on March 8, 1996 and updated in April 1999. The Thoroughfare Plan is the
highway component of the "2025 Long Range Transportation Plan" for the Fayetteville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO). This long range Transportation Plan
is a multi-modal, financially constrained plan for the area as set forth by TEA21. It was
approved by the FAMPO on June 9, 1999. A copy of the thoroughfare plan is included as
Figure 3.
F. Accident Data and Analysis
An accident study for SR 1141 was conducted for the time period from July 1,
1992 to May 31, 1996. A summary of the accident rates (in accidents per 100 million
vehicle miles) along with the statewide rates for urban three-lane undivided secondary
roads is shown in Table 2.
TABLE 3. ACCIDENT RATES (PER 100 MILLION VEHICLE MILES)
-ft
RATES ALONG SR 1141 AVERAGE STATEWIDE
(Bingham Drive) from US RATES FOR URBAN
401 to Proposed Hope Mills 2-LANE SECONDARY
ACCIDENT TYPE Bypass ROUTES
1993-1996
All Accidents 283 262.91
Fatal 1 0.66
Non-Fatal 149 105.70
Nighttime 68 51.86
Wet Conditions 65 53.85
Two hundred eighty-three accidents occurred along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
during the study period. All the accident rates were above the state average for this type of
facility during the study period. The overall accident rate during this period was 283
accidents per 100 million vehicle miles (acc/100MVM) compared to the statewide average
of 262.91 acc/100MVM for urban two-lane secondary routes during this period; resulting
in SR 1141 having a 7% higher overall accident rate than the statewide average for a two-
lane urban secondary route.
Out of the 283 accidents occurring in the studied years, there was one fatal accident
and 149 non-fatal injury accidents along SR 1141 within the project limits. Of the 283
accidents along the studied facility, the majority (43.5 percent) were rear-end collisions
and 19.4 percent resulted from left-turning traffic collisions. This is indicative of a two-
lane facility operating above its operational design limits. The addition of a continuous
middle turn lane (5-lane section) or left turn pocket lanes (4-lane divided section) will
serve to remove left-turning traffic from the mainstream flow, thereby reducing conflicting
movements, and ultimately improving safety along Bingham Drive.
G. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Project Area
Several roadway improvement projects, included in the 2000-2006 Transportation
Improvement Program, are located in the vicinity of the proposed project (see Figure 4). A
brief description of these projects, along with their current schedule, is listed below:
TIP Project U-620 (Hope Mills Bypass)
This project proposes to construct a multilane highway between SR 1141
(Bingham Rd) and SR 1363 (Elk Mill Road), a distance of 3.9 miles. The southern
portion ending at SR 1363 is proposed to be on new location. Right of way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2005. Construction is scheduled to
begin in Fiscal Year 2006.
TIP Project U-3424 (Bunce Road)
This project proposes to widen existing Bunce Road to a five-lane, 19.2 m (64
foot) face to face, curb and gutter facility, between US 401 and SR 1400 (Cliffdale
Road), a distance of 1.3 miles. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in
Fiscal Year 2004 and construction is scheduled to begin sometime after Fiscal Year
2007.
TIP Project U-2308 (Hope Mills Road)
TIP Project U-2308 proposes to widen NC 59 (Hope Mills Road) to a multi-
lane facility from south of SR 1003 (Camden Road) to US 401 Business.
Currently, right of way acquisition began in Fiscal Year 1998, with construction to
follow in Fiscal Year 2000.
TIP Project U-2304A (Cumberland Road)
TIP Project U-23 04A proposes to widen SR 1141 (Cumberland Road) to a
five-lane curb and gutter facility from NC 59 (Hope Mills Road) to SR 1233 (Yale
Street) in Cumberland County. Right of way acquisition began in August 1999 and
construction is scheduled to begin in July 2001.
TIP Project U-2810 (Camden Road)
TIP Project U-2810 proposes to widen SR 1003 (Camden Road) to a
multilane facility from NC 59 (Hope Mills Road) to SR 1007 (Owen Drive) in
Fayetteville. Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2003
and construction is scheduled to begin sometime after Fiscal Year 2007.
H. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community
The proposed improvements to SR 1141 (Bingham Road) will benefit the region
and local communities by providing safer and more efficient travel through the area. This
project will also reduce the accident potential along Bingham Drive. Additionally, the
project will remove traffic from the highly congested Brentwood Elementary School area,
providing for a safer road environment for school children.
II. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. Typical Section Description
4 From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), existing Bingham Drive
would be widened to a four-lane, 73.5 foot (22.40 m) face to face, curb and gutter divided
section with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised grassed median. From SR 3697 (Bibar Road) to SR
1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be widened to a 5-lane undivided, 68
foot (20.7 m) face to face, curb and gutter section. From Crestwood Avenue to SR 3328
(Mary Kirk Drive), Bingham Drive would be widened to a four-lane, 73.5 foot (22.40 m)
face to face, curb and gutter divided section with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised grassed median.
From Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a four-lane, 73.5 foot (22.40 m) face to face, curb and
gutter divided section with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised grassed median would be constructed
on new location to connect Bingham Drive with US 401 at Bunce Road. All typical
sections will include 14 foot outside lanes to accommodate bicycle travel. (See Figures 5A
and 5B).
B. Length of Project
SR 1141 (Bingham Road) will be widened from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401
(Raeford Road), a distance of approximately 2.7 miles (4.3 km).
C. Right of Way
The proposed improvements will require approximately 80-100 feet (24.4m-30m)
of right of way. Temporary construction easements will also be required throughout most
of the project.
D. Design Speed
The proposed design speed of the project is 50 mph (80 km/hr).
E. Intersection Treatment and Tvne of Control
The intersection of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) and SR 1107 (Fisher Road) will be
improved under T.I.P. Project U-620. For the purposes of this document, capacity
analyses were based on the following intersection configuration. The northbound
Bingham drive approach will include two through lanes and two exclusive left turn lanes.
The southbound Bingham Drive approach will provide two through lanes and one
exclusive left turn lane. Fisher Road will have one left turn lane and two right turn lanes.
The intersection is currently signalized and will remain so under the subject project.
SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) will be realigned opposite SR 3697 (Bibar Road) to
provide a four-leg intersection with Bingham Drive. The intersection of SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) and SR 3697 (Bibar Road) is currently unsignalized. The recommended
alternative proposes to signalize the new intersection of Bailey Lake Road/ Bibar Road and
Bingham Drive.
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) will be realigned opposite SR 3326 (Mary Kirk Drive)
to provide a four-leg intersection with the new location portion of Bingham Drive. The
new intersection of Bingham Drive/Mary Kirk Drive and the new location portion of
Bingham Drive will be signalized under the subject project.
SR 3051 (Bingham Place) will be bisected by the proposed new location portion of
Bingham Drive. The eastern portion of Bingham Place will be converted to a cul-de-sac
and will only be able to access existing Bingham Drive to the east. The western portion of
Bingham Place will be realigned such that it ties into the new location portion of Bingham
Drive at a ninety degree angle. This new intersection will be stop sign controlled.
The intersection of the new location portion of Bingham Drive and US 401
Business will tie into the current intersection of SR 1411 (Bunce Road) and US 401
Business, thereby creating a new four-legged intersection along US 401 Business. Dual
left turn lanes will be provided at all the approaches except for the US 401 Business
eastbound approach, which will only include one exclusive left turn lane. All approaches
will provide an exclusive right turn lane at the intersection. Additionally, there will be two
through lanes for the north-south movements. Westbound US 401 Business will include
three through lanes while eastbound US 401 Business will have four through lanes. This
intersection is currently signalized and will remain so under the subject project.
All other intersections with SR 1141 along the project are stop sign controlled and
will remain so under the current project.
F. Bridges and Drainage Structures
Alternative 1 (recommended alternative), includes bridging the wetlands associated
with the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek, located between the Aaran Lake Baptist
Church and The Pantry Convenience Store and Gas Station, west of existing Bingham
Drive. The proposed bridge structure will be 183 feet (56 meters) in length and 82.7 feet
(25.2 meters) in width and will include a 16 foot (4.8 meter) raised concrete median.
Bicycle accommodations, in the form of 14 foot (4.2 meter) wide outside lanes, and
sidewalks will be provided on both sides of the bridge. Alternative 2 does not include this
bridge structure.
G. Sidewalks
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) is listed in the Incidental Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs
section of the 2000-2006 TIP as needing pedestrian accommodations. In addition, the City
of Fayetteville has requested that sidewalks be included as part of this project. Under the
current NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines, projects that fall outside of the corporate
limits of a municipality do not qualify for NCDOT cost sharing for the construction cost of
sidewalks. However, the City of Fayetteville, in its request, noted that they are currently
updating their annexation plan and that the subject project will be annexed into the city
limits by the scheduled construction time period of 2003.
10
NCDOT has estimated that the total cost of constructing sidewalks along one side
on Bingham Drive would be approximately $286,902. According to the NCDOT
Pedestrian policy Guidelines, the population size of Fayetteville (greater than 50,000)
would allow NCDOT to participate in a 50% cost-sharing of the construction cost of
sidewalks, up to 2% of the total construction cost of the project. The City of Fayetteville
has submitted a formal request addressing the seven criteria outlined in the NCDOT
Pedestrian Policy Guidelines for the inclusion of pedestrian accommodations under the
subject project. NCDOT has reviewed this formal request and determined that sidewalks
are warranted and will participate in sharing the cost of constructing sidewalks, up to 2%
of the total construction cost of the project, provided that the City of Fayetteville annexes
the project area into the city limits before the scheduled let date of the project.
H. Bicycle Accommodations
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) is listed in the 2000-2006 TIP in the Incidental Bicycle
and Pedestrian Needs section as needing bicycle accommodations. The recommended
alternative provides 14 foot (4.2 m) wide outside lanes along the entire length of the
project to accommodate bicycle traffic.
1. Greenways
The project will not impact any designated greenways.
J. Special Permits Required
Impacts to wetlands are anticipated from project construction. In accordance with
provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit will be required from the COE
for discharge of dredge or fill material into "Waters of the United States." Due to wetland
and surface water impacts, a Section 404 Nationwide 14 Permit will likely be necessary for
this project.
This project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to
the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the CWA requires that the state
issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may
result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. The issuance of a 401 permit from the
DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
K. Noise Barriers
The project, as proposed, will require no control of access. Access openings in a
noise barrier severely reduces the noise reduction provided by the barrier. In addition,
businesses, churches, and other related establishments located along a particular highway
normally require accessibility and high visibility. Also, a section of the proposed road is
on new location and there are no receptors along the proposed route. Based on these
factors, noise barriers are not recommended for this project.
L. Anticipated Design Exceptions
There are no anticipated design exceptions needed for the recommended
improvements.
M. Cost Estimates
The total cost of the improvements recommended in this document is $14,673,000,
which includes $11,800,000 for construction and $2,873,000 for right of way acquisition.
The 2000-2006 TIP includes a total funding for this project of $10,750,000 which includes
$7,950,000 for construction and $2,800,000 for right of way acquisition.
12
III. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Alternate Modes of Transportation
The primary mode of transportation in and around Fayetteville is the automobile.
The City of Fayetteville does not provide bus, vanpooling, or carpooling services in the
vicinity of the project. Trip origins and destinations are widespread in this area and public
transportation alternatives would not provide the improved access between southwestern
and northwestern Cumberland County. Alternatives to the automobile would not: provide
a direct north-south route from Hope Mills to Fort Bragg on the north west side of
Fayetteville; nor would it substantially or economically serve to alleviate congestion and
improve safety along SR 1141 (Bingham Drive). Therefore, providing an alternate mode
of transportation other than the automobile would not serve to meet the purpose and need
of the project.
B. No Build Alternative
This alternative is used as a basis for the comparison of alternatives, as well as
being an alternative under consideration. It would avoid limited adverse environmental
impacts that are anticipated to result from the project. With the projected traffic demand
increase, motorist safety and convenience would be sacrificed, leading to greater likelihood
of accidents at intersections and driveways. For these reasons, this alternative is not
recommended.
C. Postponement Alternative
Construction of the proposed route will provide a more direct north-south corridor
and reduce travel time between Hope Mills and Northern Cumberland County.
Postponement of this project is not recommended since the anticipated growth in traffic
demand will lower the level-of-service of existing SR 1141 (Bingham Drive), SR 1411
(Bunce Road), and US 401 (Raeford Road). This would lead to higher operating costs,
increased delays, and reduction in safety.
D. Recommended Alternative
NCDOT will widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from an existing combination two-
lane/three-lane grass shoulder facility to a combination of a four lane divided curb and
gutter facility with a raised grassed median and a five lane undivided curb and gutter
facility between SR 1107 (Fisher Road) and SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive). From SR 3328
(Mary Kirk Drive) north to US 401 Business (Raeford Road), NCDOT will construct a
four lane divided curb and gutter facility with a raised grassed median on new location, a
total distance of approximately 2.7 miles (4.3 km). Bicycles will be accommodated by the
use of 14 foot (4.2 meter) wide outside lanes in each direction along the entire length of the
project. The proposed improvements are shown in Figure 2.
13
The completed project will provide a design speed of 50 mph (80 km/hr). It will.
require approximately 80-100 feet (24.4m-30m) of right of way. Temporary construction
easements will also be required throughout most of the project. There will be 3 residential
relocations and 1 business relocation. The recommended improvement will impact one
wetland site located along the project (see Figure 2).
Realignment of the SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) intersection with SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to the south will be included in the widening of Bingham Drive. This
realignment will provide a four way intersection at the current intersection of SR 3697
(Bibar Road) and SR 1141 (Bingham Drive). This new intersection will be signalized as
part of this project.
E. Design Alternatives
Tvoical Section Alternatives
Two typical cross sections were evaluated for this project: a four-lane
median divided section and a five-lane undivided section. The four-lane divided
section would consist of two pavements with curb and gutter (each measuring
28.75 feet, or 8.625m, between the curb faces) divided by a 16 foot (4.8 meter)
raised grassed median (See Figure 5A). The five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter
section would measure 68 feet (20.7 m) between the curb faces with a 12 foot (3.6
meter) continuous middle turn lane and 14 foot (4.2 m) outside lanes (See Figure
5B). A combination of these two typical sections is proposed for this project in
order to reduce overall residential and commercial property impacts and
environmental impacts, while at the same time increasing the safety and traffic
carrying capacity of the facility.
2. Alignment Alternatives
Two alignment alternatives were considered for widening SR 1141, both of
which included the consideration of symmetrical widening, asymmetrical
widening, or a combination of both.
a. Alternative 1 (recommender) alternative
From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to just south of SR 1106 (Bailey Lake
Road), existing Bingham Drive would be widened to a four-lane, 73.5 foot
(22.40 m) face to face, curb and gutter facility with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised
grassed median and 14 foot outside lanes. Widening would be
asymmetrical, occurring entirely along the west side of existing Bingham
Drive. SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) would be realigned to the south of its
current location to tie into Bingham Drive across from SR 3697 (Bibar
Road). This new four-way intersection would be signalized.
From SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood
Avenue), existing Bingham Drive would be widened symmetrically to a
14
five-lane divided, 68 foot (20.7 m) face to face, curb and gutter section with
a continuous 12 foot (3.6 m) center turn lane and 14 foot (4.2 m) outside
lanes.
From SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue) to SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive),
existing Bingham Drive would be widened symmetrically to the four-lane
raised median divided section described above.
From SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive) to US 401 (Raeford Road),
Alternate 1 proposes to construct a four-lane, 73.5 foot (22.40 m) face to
face, curb and gutter facility with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised grassed median
on new location. The existing wetland located to the west of existing
Bingham Drive between Marykirk Drive and the Aaran Lake Baptist
Church would be bridged under this alternative.
Existing Bingham Drive would be realigned at its intersection with
the new location section of Bingham Drive so that it intersects across from
existing Marykirk Drive. This new intersection would be signalized.
Additionally, SR 3051 (Bingham Place), east of the Bingham Drive
Extension, would be a cul-de-sac. Bingham Place, west of the Bingham
Drive Extension, would be realigned such that it tied into Bingham Drive
Extension just north of its current location (See Figure 2).
b. Alternative 2
From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to just south of SR 1106 (Bailey Lake
Road), existing Bingham Drive would be widened to a four-lane, 73.5 foot
(22.40 m) face to face, curb and gutter facility with a 16 foot (4.8 m) raised
grassed median and 14 foot outside lanes. Widening would be
asymmetrical, occurring entirely along the west side of existing Bingham
Drive. SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) would be realigned to the south of its
current location to tie into Bingham Drive across from SR 3697 (Bibar
Road). This new four-way intersection would be signalized.
From SR 1106 (Bailey Lake Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood
Avenue), existing Bingham Drive would be widened symmetrically to a
five-lane divided, 68 foot (20.7 m) face to face, curb and gutter section with
a continuous 12 foot (3.6 m) center turn lane and 14 foot (4.2 m) outside
lanes.
From SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue) to SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive),
existing Bingham Drive would be widened symmetrically to the four-lane
raised median divided section described above.
15
From SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive) to US 401 (Raeford Road),
Alternate 2 proposes to widen existing SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a five-
lane divided, 68 foot (20.7 m) face to face, curb and gutter section with a
continuous 12 foot (3.6 m) center turn lane and 14 foot (4.2 m) outside
lanes. In order to accommodate projected volumes of traffic traveling along
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) north to US 401 (Raeford Road), additional left
turn lanes would be required at the existing SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
intersection with US 401 (Raeford Road). Additional right of way width
would be required in the vicinity of this intersection to accommodate this
additional width of roadway and turn lanes. Because the major traffic
movement in the vicinity of this intersection is from northbound SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) onto westbound US 401 (Raeford Road) and then
northbound onto SR 1411 (Bunce Road), additional through lanes on
westbound US 401 (Raeford Road) would be necessary to accommodate
this additional traffic. This would require additional right of way to be
acquired along US 401 (Raeford Road) between SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
and Bunce Road.
c. Alternative 3
Alternative 3 is similar to Alternative 2 in that it proposes to widen
Bingham Drive along existing alignment from Fisher Road to US 401
Business. From the intersection at US 401 Business northward, a facility on
new location would be constructed that would tie into existing Bunce Road
north of its intersection with US 401 Business. This alternative would
basically result in the realignment of Bunce Road to the east.
Environmental field studies conducted for this alternative concluded that
extreme impacts to existing wetlands and streams would result if this
alternative were built. After reviewing the proposed project area north of
US 401 Business, it was determined that the only feasible location for the
new location of this alternative would either involve unreasonable impacts
to existing residences or to existing wetlands. For this reason this
Alternative 3 was dropped from further study. No design work was
prepared for this alternative, nor were any cost estimates requested.
16
Table 4 - Design Alternatives
CONSTRUCTION RIGHT OF RELOCATEES WETLANDS
ALTERNATIVE COST WAY COST (entire project) IMPACTED
Ilu acre
3 residential
Alternative 1 $11,800,000 $2,873,000 1 business 0 0
(Recommended)
2 Residential
Alternative 2 $9,900,000* $2,656,000* 0 Business 0.052 0.128
* Estimated costs do not account for extra lanes and additional right of way along US 401
proposed by Alternative 2.
F. Conclusions
NCDOT studied two alignment alternatives for the widening of the SR 1141
(Bingham Drive). NCDOT's recommended alignment, Alternative 1, was chosen based on
comments received from local citizens and officials, various resource agencies, and input
from internal design sources. NCDOT believes that Alternative 1 provides the best
balance between project costs and overall impacts, both environmental and social, while
still satisfying the purpose and need of the project. The estimated project cost for
Alternative 1 was $2,117,000 more than Alternative 2, had two more relocated properties,
and completely avoided impacts to wetlands located along the project. Although
Alternative 1 is estimated to cost $2,117,000 more than Alternative 2, Alternative 2 would
have impacted wetlands associated with the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek and would
not have provided a continuous south-western looping facility, thereby not fulfilling the
purpose and need of this project. Local officials, and citizens living along existing
Bingham Drive, favored Alternative 1 over Alternative 2 because it would remove traffic
from the highly congested Brentwood Elementary School area, would reduce overall right-
of way impacts and minimize property damage along existing Bingham Drive, and would
increase the traffic carrying capacity of Bingham Drive, thereby providing a better level of
service (LOS) and safer travel through the area. Wetland impacts were minimized to every
extent possible. The recommended alternative will bridge existing wetlands located along
the new location portion of this project. In addition, right of way impacts were minimized
by the selection of an alternative that traversed a large section of primarily undeveloped
property and avoided established neighborhoods and residences along the northern section
of Bingham Drive. This enabled NCDOT to design a roadway that was able to avoid
major impacts to existing homes and businesses along the northern portion of Bingham
Drive, divert traffic away from the congested Brentwood Elementary School and Aaran
Lake Baptist Church area, and provide a direct route within a proposed northwest-
southeast corridor that will link several major thoroughfares around Fayetteville. For all
the reasons listed above, NCDOT recommends Alternative 1 for the widening and
extension of Bingham Drive.
17
IV. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. Social Effects
1. Land Use
The zoning and use of land along the project corridor is predominantly
residential. However, a few pockets of commercial activity are located along
Bingham Drive.
a. Status of Planning
The Cumberland County 2010 Land Use Plan guides development
within the county. The Cumberland County Thoroughfare Plan
governs issues related to transportation planning, traffic, and street
design.
b. Existing Land Use and Zoning
The area consists of both residential and commercial zoning areas.
At its northern end, where the project intersects with US 401, the
land is zoned for heavy commercial use. This classification allows a
wide variety of heavy retail, service, and wholesale establishments.
Businesses located around this intersection include a bank, a small
neighborhood shopping center, and a motel. A small pocket of
institutional zoning is located along Bingham Drive as it extends
southward from US 401. An elementary school and a church are
located in this area. Between Mary Kirk Drive and Bailey Lake
Road, the land on either side of the project corridor is zoned for low-
density residential use. This classification allows a density of 2-6
units per acre. Much of this area is developed with typical
residential subdivisions. Most of the land along the remainder of the
corridor's length is undeveloped and zoned for low-density
residential use. There are, however, a few pockets of medium
density residential and commercial zoning along the western side of
the corridor. Medium density residential zoning allows 7-15
dwelling units per acre. One of these areas near the southern end of
the project, known as "Pebble Creek", is the site of a small
development of cluster or patio homes. The area on the eastern side
of the road, between Pepperbush Drive and Bailey Lake Road is
zoned for heavy commercial use. A small cluster of businesses has
located along Pepperbush Drive. These businesses include a day-
care facility, a dry cleaning shop, a machine shop, and two
automobile garages.
18
C. Future Land Use
Local planners do not anticipate significant changes in land use and
zoning in the project area.
d. Project Consistency with Local Plans
Local planners indicate that the project is consistent with the plans.
Farmland Impacts
The project is located within the Urban Service Area of Cumberland
County and the zoning and use of land along the corridor is urban in
character. Therefore, the project should have no impact on prime or
important farmland.
2. Neighborhood Characteristics
a. Geographic and Political Location
Cumberland County is located in the southeastern portion of the
state. It is surrounded on the cast by Sampson County; by Bladen,
Robeson, and Scotland Counties on the south; by Hoke and Moore
Counties on the west; and by Harnett County on the north. The
project extends through the county's Urban Service Area in the
southwestern part of the county between Fayetteville and Hope
Mills. As can be seen from the tables below, the project area is
somewhat younger and more affluent than the county as a whole.
b. Race, Ethnicity, and Age
According to the 1990 Census, the population of
Cumberland County was 274,566. The Office of State Planning
(OSP) estimates that the 1997 population was 292,252. Between
1990 and 1997 Cumberland County grew by approximately 7.5%.
19
Table 5. Population by Race and Hispanic Origins (Cumberland Co.)
Project Area County North Carolina
Number % Number % Number %
Total Population -
1990 7,432 100 274,566 100 6,628,637 100
Total Hispanic 365 4.9 12,402 4.8 69,020
White 4,701 63.3 170,278 62.0 5,011,248 75.6
Hispanic 159 3.4 4,255 2.5 33,967
Black 2,277 30.6 87,482 31.8 1,455,340 21.9
Hispanic 31 1.4 1,290 1.5 5,962
American Indian 83 1.1 4,577 1.7 82,606 13
Hispanic 6 7.2 91 2.0 1,083
Asian/Pacific
Islander 191 2.6 5,572 2.1 50,395 0.8
Hispanic 4 2.1 308 5.5 1,154
Other 180 2.4 6,685 2.4 29,048 0.4
Hispanic 165 91.9 6,458 96.5 26,854
OSP estimates for 1997 are that 182,592 (62%) county residents are
white and 112,666 38%) are non-white. OSP also estimates the
1990 county Hispanic population at 12,402 or 4.8%, higher than the
statewide average of 1.16%. The median age for Cumberland
County was 36.7 years, in comparison with the state average of 33.2
years.
Table 6. Population by Age (Cumberland Co.)
Project Area County North Carolina
Number % Number % Number %
Total Population
(1990) 7,432 100 274,566 100 6,628,637 100
o to 64 7,253 97.6 257,909 93.9 5,826,580 87.9
65 or above 179 2.4 16,657 6.1 802,057 12.1
C. Public Facilities, Schools and Institutions
The Brentwood Elementary School is located along the project
corridor near its intersection with US 401. Currently, the school has
754 students and 95-100 faculty and staff members.
20
d. Police. Fire. EMS and Public Services
No such public services are located along the project corridor.
e. Business activity/employment institutions
Most of the land along the project corridor is either undeveloped, or
it has been heavily developed with residential subdivisions.
Consequently, there is little business activity located along the
corridor. Most of the businesses that are located along, or close to,
the corridor serve the surrounding residential areas. They include
several auto-related businesses, such as convenience stores, gas
stations, and garages. A drapery and blind shop and craft store are
also located along the corridor.
3. Relocations
Additional right of way will be needed to construct the project. Temporary
construction easements will also be required. Relocation reports for two
alternatives were prepared. Alternative 1 (recommended alternative) includes the
extension of Bingham Drive on new location from Mary Kirk Drive to US 401
Business. Under this alternative, three residential and one business relocates would
result. Alternative 2 calls for widening Bingham Drive to a multi-lane facility
along its existing alignment from Fisher Road to US 401 Business. Under this
alternative, two residential and no business relocatees would result. Relocation
reports for the two alternatives are included in Appendix 1 of this report (see pages
Al-3 and Al-4).
For all relocations, it is the policy of the NCDOT to ensure that comparable
replacement housing will be available prior to construction of State and Federally
assisted projects. Furthermore, the North Carolina Board of Transportation has the
following three programs to minimize the inconvenience of relocation:
*Relocation Assistance
*Relocation Moving Payments, and
*Relocation replacement housing payments or rent supplement.
Appendix 1 contains information on the Division of Highways Relocation
Programs (see pages A 1-1 and A 1-2).
4. Public Facilities
There are no public facilities located within the project limits.
21
5. Social Impacts
a. Communitv stabilitv and neighborhood cohesion
By improving traffic flow and easing congestion in southwestern
Cumberland County, the project should have a positive impact on
the general livability and economic stability of Cumberland County,
as well as the communities of Fayetteville and Hope Mills. The
project may, however, have a negative impact on neighborhood
cohesion along its corridor. Bingham Road already separates
residential areas on both its sides in the area between Bailey Lake
Road and Kincross Avenue. These areas may be considered
distinct, separate neighborhoods. However, residents of these areas
may be crossing Bingham Drive on foot and by car to visit friends
and neighbors, or to visit the convenience store at the intersection of
Worthington Drive.
b. Tax base changes, changes in employment
As noted just above, Alternative 1 (recommended alternative) might
cause the relocation of as many as three homes and one small
business. These potential relocations should not have a serious
impact on the county's tax base or upon business and employment
patterns in the area.
6. Title VI and Environmental Justice
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and related statutes, requires there
be no discrimination in Federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color,
national origin, age, sex, or disability. Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations," provides that "each federal agency make achieving environmental
justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects' of its
programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations." The Executive Order makes clear that its provisions apply fully to
Adverse effects means significant cumulative human health or environmental effects, including social and economic
effects, which may include, but are not limited to: bodily impairment, infinuity, illness or death; air, noise, and water
pollution and soil contamination; vibration; destruction or diminution of aesthetic values; destruction or disruption of
man-made or natural resources, of community cohesion or a community's economic vitality, or of the availability of
public and private facilities and services; adverse employment effects; displacement of persons, businesses, farms, or
nonprofit organizations; increased traffic congestion; isolation, exclusion or separation of minority or low-income
individuals within a given conunmiity or from the broader community; and the denial of, reduction in, or significant
delay in the receipt of, benefits of DOT programs, policies, or activities.
Disproportionately high adverse effect on minority and low-income populations means an adverse effect that: (1) is
predominately borne by a minority population and/or a low-income population, or (2) %vill be suffered by the
minority population and/or low-income population and is appreciably more severe or greater in magnitude than the
adverse effect that will be suffered by the non-minority population and/or non-low-income population (:n/dptcd frot77
the Find/ POT Ortter on en r imnmentdt fusticeJ.
22
American Indian populations and Indian tribes. Environmental justice refers to the
equitable treatment of people of all races, cultures, and income with respect to the
development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations
and policies.
The project should have no impact on residential areas that are
characterized by high concentrations of minority or low-income residents.
7. Historic and Cultural Resources
a. Historic Architectural Resources
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) conducted a file
search and found no structures of historical or architectural importance
located within the project area. SHPO recommended no survey for historic
architectural resources. Based on this recommendation, no surveys were
conducted. See page A3-34 for a copy of correspondence from SHPO.
b. Archaeolocical Resources
According to SHPO, there are no known archaeological sites within
the project area, and it is unlikely any archaeological resources eligible for
inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the
project. SHPO recommended no survey for archaeological resources.
Based on this recommendation, no surveys were conducted. See page A3-
52 for a copy of correspondence from the SHPO.
Section 4(f) Resources
Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966
specifies that publicly owned land from a park, recreation area, or wildlife
or waterfowl refuge or land from historic resources of national, state, or
local significance may be used for Federal-Aid projects only if:
(1) There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of such
land.
(2) Such highway program or project includes all possible
planning to minimize harm to 4(f) lands resulting from such
use.
The project will not use property from any resource protected by Section 4(f).
23
B. Economic Effects
1. Income Measures and Persons Living Below the Poverty Level
The 1990 median household income for Cumberland County was $25,462
while the average household income was $30,790. Per capita income was $11,100.
Cumberland County had 36,495 persons (13.2%) living below the poverty level, of
whom 15,326 (5.6%) live at or below 50% of the poverty level.

Table 7. Persons Living Below Poverty Level (Cumberland Co.)
Project Area County North Carolina
Number % Number % Number %
Median Household $30,886 100 $25,462 100 $26,647 100
Income
Average Household $34,989 100 $30,790 100 $33,242 100
Income
Per Capita Income $11,876 100 $11,100 100 $13,093 100
Persons below 651 8.5 36,495 13.2 829,858 12.5
poverty level - total
Persons below 50% 377 4.9 15,326 5.6 332,966 5.0
of poverty level -
total
2. Business Activity/Employment Centers
Most of the land along the project corridor is either undeveloped, or it has
been heavily developed with residential sub-divisions. Consequently, there is little
business activity located along the corridor. Most of the businesses that are located
along, or close to, the corridor serve the surrounding residential areas. They include
several auto-related businesses, such as convenience stores, gas stations, and
garages. A drapery and blind shop and a craft store are also located along the
corridor.
3. Secondary/Cumulative Impacts
One unintended consequence of roadway improvements can depend upon
local land development regulations, development demand, water/sewer availability,
and other factors such as encouragement of additional development and sprawl.
Improvements to levels of service, better accommodation of merging and exiting
traffic, and reductions in travel times can have land development impacts outside of
the project area.
24
C. Environmental Effects
1. Methodologv
Research of the project study area was conducted prior to field
investigations. Information sources used in the pre-field investigation include: U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle map (Fayetteville), National Wetland
Inventory maps (Fayetteville), and Soil Survey of Cumberland and Hoke Counties
(United States Department of Agriculture, 1984). Water resource information was
obtained from publications of the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (1995), North Carolina Division of Water Quality (1998) and from
the Environmental Sensitivity Base Map of Cumberland County (NC Center for
Geographic Information and Analysis, 1995). Information concerning the
occurrence of federal and state protected species in the study area was gathered
from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) list of protected species
and federal species of concern (14 May, 1998) and from the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NHP) database of rare species and unique habitats.
General field surveys were conducted along the proposed alignment by
NCDOT Biologist Chris A. Murray on 15 April 1998, 26 May 1998, 30 June 1998,
and 31 July 1998. Plant communities and their associated wildlife were identified
and recorded. Wildlife identification involved using one or more of the following
observational techniques: active searching and capture, visual observations
(binoculars), and identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat, tracks
and burrows). Jurisdictional wetland determinations were performed utilizing
delineation criteria prescribed in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual" (Environmental Laboratory, 1987).
Definitions for descriptions used in this report are as follows: Project
Study Area denotes the area bound by proposed ROW limits; Project Vicinity
describes an area extending 0.8 km (0.5 mi) on all sides of the project study area;
and Project Region is equivalent to an area represented by a 7.5 minute USGS
quadrangle map centered on the project.
a. Qualifications of Principal Investigator
Investigator: Chris A. Murray
Education: B.S. Zoology, St. Cloud State University, St.
Cloud, Minnesota
M.S. Coastal Ecology, Univ. North Carolina at
Wilmington, North Carolina
Certification: Professional Wetland Scientist No. 1130
Experience: Environmental Services, Inc. 1991-1992
Environmental Investigations, P.A. 1992-1994
N. Carolina Dept. of Transportation 1995-present
25
Expertise: Wetland Delineation. NEPA Investigations. and
Protected Species Surveys
y
2. Phvsical Characteristics
Soil and water resources which occur in the project study area are discussed
below. Soil types and availability of water directly influence composition and
distribution of flora and fauna in any biotic community.
The project study area is comprised of residential development, businesses,
school, and undeveloped forested land. The project study area is located in Coastal
Plain physiographic province. This area of Cumberland County is characterized as
gently sloping with more pronounced sloping near streams. The project study area
is located approximately 39.6 to 70.1 m (130 to 230 ft) above mean sea level.
a. Soils
The project study area is located within the Wagram-Faceville-
Norfolk Association. This association contains nearly level to gently
sloping, well drained and poorly drained soils that have a loamy or clayey
subsoil. Dominant soils located in the uplands include Candor sand,
Lakeland sand, Wagram loamy sand, and Wagram-Urban land complex.
These soils are generally well drained. The soil map unit located in the
major drainageway in the project study area is incorrectly mapped in the
Soil Survey of Cumberland and Hoke Counties. The soil survey has Blaney
loamy sand mapped in the major drainageway; however, Blaney loamy sand
is a well-drained soil. Field observations indicate that the major
drainageway closely resembles Johnston loam, which is a hydric, poorly
drained soil. The project study area is comprised of twelve mapped soil
units:
O Autryville loamy sand, 0-2% slopes: This non-hydric, well
drained soil is on broad, smooth flats of uplands. Permeability is
moderately rapid in the upper part of the subsoil and moderate in
the lower part. The water table is at a depth of 4 to 6 ft.
o Blaney loamy sand, 8-15% slope: This non-hydric, well drained
soil is on side slopes of uplands. Permeability is moderate and
available water capacity is low. A perched water table is
frequently above the brittle soil for brief periods after heavy rains.
o Candor sand, 1-8% slope: This non-hydric, somewhat
excessively drained soil is in broad areas and to a lesser extent on
26
rounded side slopes of uplands. Permeability is moderate and
available water capacity is very low.
• Faceville-Urban land complex, 0-6% slope: This non-hydric map
unit consists of areas of Faceville soil and areas of Urban land
that are too small and too intermingled to be mapped separately.
Permeability is moderate and available water capacity is medium.
• Gilead loamy sand, 2-8% slope: This non-hydric, moderately
well drained soil is on side slopes along streams in uplands.
Permeability is moderately slow or slow. A perched water table
commonly is above the clayey, brittle subsoil for brief periods
during wet seasons. Available water capacity is medium to high.
Johnston loam: This hydric, nearly level, very poorly drained soil
is along major drainageways. Permeability is moderately rapid in
the upper part of the soil and rapid in the lower part. The
seasonal high water table is at or above the surface most of the
year. This soil is subject to frequent flooding.
• Lakeland sand, 1-8% slope: This non-hydric, excessively drained
soil is on broad ridges of uplands and rims of bays. Permeability
is very rapid and available water capacity is low.
Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slope: This non-hydric, well drained
soil is on broad, smooth flats of uplands. Permeability is
moderate and available water capacity is medium. The seasonal
high water table is 4 to 6 feet below the surface during the winter
and early in spring.
• Vaucluse loamy sand, 8-15% slope: This non-hydric, well
drained soil is on side slopes of uplands. Permeability is
moderately slow in the upper part of the subsoil and slow in the
lower part.
Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slope: This non-hydric, well drained
soil is on broad, smooth flats and side slopes of uplands.
Permeability is moderately rapid and available water capacity is
low to medium.
o Wagram-Urban land complex, 0-8% slope: This non-hdyric map
unit consists of areas of Wagram soil and areas of Urban land that
are too small and too intermingled to be mapped separately.
27
Permeability is moderately rapid and available water capacity is
low to medium.
3. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to
be impacted by the project. Water resource information encompasses the
resources' relationship to major water systems, its physical aspects, Best Usage
Classification, and water quality of the resources. Probable impacts to these water
bodies are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
a. Subbasin Characteristics
Water resources located within the project study area lie in the
Upper Cape Fear Watershed (Subbasin 03-06-15) of the Cape Fear River
Drainage Basin. The Cape Fear River Basin is the largest river basin in the
state, covering 9,149 square miles. An assessment of water quality data
indicates that the Upper Cape Fear Watershed has generally good to good-
fair water quality. However, sedimentation is the most widespread cause of
impairment in the basin. Other sources of pollution include oxygen
demanding wastes, nutrients, and toxic substances (DEM, 1995).
b. Stream Characteristics
An unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek and a small portion of Arran
Lake are the only surface waters located in the study area. The unnamed
tributary to Beaver Creek is a braided stream system that is approximately
30.5 m (100 ft) wide and 0.2 m (0.5 ft) deep. The substate is comprised of
sand and gravel.
The unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek originates approximately 6
km (4 mi) northwest of the project area. From its headwaters, it flows to the
southeast until it outfalls into an unnamed man-made lake immediately to
the west of the project study area. At the outfall to this lake, the stream
forms a braided system and is culverted under Bingham Drive. The stream
then outfalls into Arran Lake located in the eastern portion of the project
study area. The tributary outfalls Arran Lake and continues to the southeast
approximately 1.2 km (0.8 mi) to its confluence with Beaver Creek.
C. Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the
Division of Water Quality (1998). According to the DWQ, the best usage
classification of Beaver Creek (DWQ Index Number 18-31-24-5) is C. The
best usage classification of unnamed tributaries is the same as the water
28
body to which they are a tributary. Arran Lake does not have a DWQ Index
Number but would carry the same best usage classification as Beaver
Creek. Class C waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival.
fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. No water resources
classified as High Quality Waters (HQW's). Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-
II), or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW's) are located within 1.6 km
(1.0 mi) of the project study area.
d. Water Quality
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is
managed by the DWQ and is part of an ongoing ambient water quality
monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water quality. The
program assesses water quality by sampling for selected benthic
macro invertebrate organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Macro invertebrates
are sensitive to very subtle changes in water quality; thus, the species
richness and overall biomass of these organisms are reflections of water
quality. There are no BMAN monitoring sites located in the project
vicinity.
Point sources refer to discharges that enter surface water through a
pipe, ditch, or other defined points of discharge. The term most commonly
refers to discharges associated with wastewater treatment plants. Point
source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.
Any discharger is required to register for a permit. There are no NPDES
sites located within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) upstream of the project study area.
Non-point source refers to runoff that enters surface waters through
stormwater flow or no defined point of discharge. There are many types of
land use activities that can serve as sources of nonpoint source pollution
including land development, construction, crop production, animal feeding
lots, failing septic systems, landfills, roads, and parking lots. Sediment and
nutrients are major pollution-causing substances associated with nonpoint
source pollution. Others include fecal coliform bacteria, heavy metals, oil
and grease, and any other substance that may be washed off the ground or
removed from the atmosphere and carried into surface waters. Sewer lines
were being installed along the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek during
the project study visits. Sedimentation control measures were lacking or
improperly maintained during these visits. Sediment was visibly entering
the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek at these times.
29
e. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Construction of this project will result in impacts to water resources.
The only water resources located within the project study area are an
unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek and a small portion of Arran Lake.
Land clearing and grubbing activities in this area will directly result in soil
erosion leading to increased sedimentation and turbidity in nearby water
resources. These effects may extend downstream for considerable distance
with decreasing intensity.
Removal of stream- and lake-side vegetation will have a negative
effect on water quality. The vegetation typically shades the water's surface
from sunlight, thus moderating water temperature. Streambank vegetation
also stabilizes streambanks and reduces sedimentation by trapping soil
particles.
Locally, the construction of this project will increase the amount of
impervious area in the project study area and vehicular use in the vicinity of
the project study area. This will directly lead to an increase in
concentrations of toxic compounds (gas, oil, and highway spills) which may
be carried into nearby water resources via precipitation, sheet flow, and
subsurface drainage. Increased amounts of toxic materials can adversely
alter the water quality of any water resource, thus impacting its biological
and chemical functions.
In order to minimize impacts to water resources in the entire impact
area, NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of
Surface Waters must be strictly enforced during the entire life of the project.
The NCDOT, in cooperation with DWQ, has developed a sedimentation
control program for highway projects which adopts formal BMPs for the
protection of surface waters.
Species of anadromous fish may utilize streams in the project study
area. Construction guidelines for stream crossings containing anadromous
fish are outlined in the NCDOT Stream Crossing Guidelines For
Anadromous Fish Passage. These guidelines are applicable for all projects
crossing perennial or intermittent tributaries (delineated on a USGS
topographic map) located below the fall line. The purpose of this document
is to provide guidance to NCDOT to ensure that replacement of existing and
new highway stream crossing structures will not impede the movement of
anadromous fish. Mr. Fritz Rhode, North Carolina Department of Marine
Fisheries (NCDMF), was consulted on March 28, 2000 concerning this
proposed crossing. He stated that because the proposed crossing of the
unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek is located between two man-made
dammed ponds, anadromous fish are not likely to occur in the subject
30
tributary; therefore, neither the guidelines above nor a moratorium on
construction activity is applicable to this project.
4. Biotic Resources
' Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section
describes those ecosystems encountered in the study area, as well as the
relationships between fauna and flora within these ecosystems. Composition and
distribution of biotic communities throughout the project area are reflective of
topography, hydrologic influences and past and present land uses. Descriptions of
the terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community
classifications.
Dominant flora and fauna likely to occur in each community are described
and discussed. Fauna observed during field investigations are denoted with an
asterisk (*). Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are
provided for each animal and plant species described. Subsequent references to the
same organism will include the common name only.
Plant community descriptions are based on a classification system utilized
by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) (Schafale and Weakley
1990). When appropriate, community classifications were modified to better
reflect field observations. Vascular plant names follow nomenclature found in
Radford et al. (1968). Habitats used by terrestrial wildlife and aquatic organisms,
as well as expected population distributions, were determined through field
observations, evaluation of available habitat, and supportive documentation
(Martof et al. 1980; Webster et al. 1985; Rhode et al. 1994; Potter et al. 1980).
Recreational fishing potential was obtained from Fish (1968).
5. Terrestrial Communities
Five terrestrial communities are identified in the project study area:
disturbed community, hardwood forest, pine forest, mixed pine-hardwood forest,
alluvial swamp.
Disturbed Community
This community encompasses several types of habitats that have
recently been or are currently impacted by human disturbance: roadside
shoulder, maintained yard, cropland, sewer line corridor, powerline
corridor, and abandoned field.
Roadside shoulder are land parcels in which the vegetation is kept in
a low-growing, early successional state. These areas appear to be regularly
mowed and may receive frequent herbicide application. This habitat is
31
located directly adjacent to Bingham Road throughout the project. Species
observed here include fescue (Festuca spp.), crabgrass (Digitaria spp.).
Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon). cat's ear (Hjpochoeris radicata).
dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), path rush (Juncus tenuis), bush clover
(Lespedeza sp.), winged sumac (Rhus copallina), white clover (Ti•ifoliipn
repens), blunt-leaved milkweed (Asclepias amplexicaulis), wire grass
(Aristida stricta), wisteria (iisteria frutescens), yarrow (Achillea
millefolium), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Japanese honeyscukle
(Lonicera japonica), Venus's looking glass (Specularia peifoliata),
horseweed (Erigeron canadensis), goldenrod (Solidago sp.), peppergrass
(Lepidium virginicum), and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera).
Maintained yards are primarily restricted to housing and business
sites located in the project study area. Dominant species located in the
herbaceous and vine layer include prickly pear cactus (Opuntia druniondii),
fescue, crabgrass, Bermuda grass, English plantain (Plantago lanceolata),
curly dock (Rumex crispus), wisteria, greenbrier (Smilax bona-nox), poison
ivy, Japanese honeysuckle and Virgina creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia). Species located in the tree and shrub layer include loblolly
pine (Pinus taeda), long leaf pine (P. palustris), red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), crepe myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica), dogwood (Corpus
florida), privet (Ligustrum sinense), wax myrtle, laurel oak (Quercus
laurifolia), water oak (Q. nigra), red bud (Cercis canadensis), and azalea
(Rhododendron sp.).
Cropland is located along the southern terminus of the project near
Fisher Road. Species observed here include corn (Zea mays), rye (Secale
cereale), potato (Solanum tuberosum), and soybean (Glycine max). The
sewer line easement is located to the immediate south of the unnamed
tributary to Beaver Creek. Plants observed here include fescue, crabgrass,
Venus's looking glass, henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), vetch (Vicia sp.),
corn salad (Valerianella locusta), geranium (Geranium carolinianum), and
elderberry (Sambucus canadensis).
The power line corridor is located in isolated sites along Bingham
Road. Sapling sized hardwoods, pines, and shrubs located here include
sassafras (Sassafras albidum), live oak (Quercus virginia), scrubby post oak
(Q. margaretta), blackjack oak (O. marilandica), mockernut hickory
(Carya tomentosa), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), chinaberry (Melia
azedarach), black cherry (Prunus serotina), loblolly pine, and winged
sumac. Herbaceous and vine species observed in this community include
prickly pear cactus, St. John's wort (Hypericum sp.), sneezeweed (Helenium
smarian), bushclover, broomsedge (Androgogon virginicus), Venus's
looking glass, greenbrier, trumpet creeper, blackberry (Rubus argutus),
grape (Vitis rotundifolia), blunt-leaved milkweed, pasture thistle (Cirsium
32
punuilus), yellow jessamine (Gelsemium semperl-irens). poison oak (Rhus
toxicodendro»). ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), and curly dock.
Large tracts of abandoned field are located along Bingham Road.
This community is dominated by sapling sized hardwoods, herbs, and vines.
Species identified here include chickasaw plum (Primus angustifolia), red
cedar, sassafras, persimmon, black cherry, loblolly pine, goldenrod, English
plantain, soft rush (Juncus effusus), horseweed, bushclover, trumpet
creeper, broomsedge, aster (Aster sp.), winged sumac, sneezeweed, ebony
spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), blackberry, ragweed, corn salad,
Japanese honeysuckle, rabbit tobacco (Gnaphalium obtusifolium) and bead
grass (Paspalum sp.).
b. Hardwood Forest
Isolated tracts of forest dominated by hardwoods are present along
Bingham Road. Dominant species located here include water oak (Ouecus
nigra), black cherry, greenbrier, Virginia magnolia, (Alagnolia virginiana),
sweet gum (Liquidambar styracif ua), live oak, red maple (Ater rubrum),
and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum).
Pine Forest
The pine forest is restricted to two isolated sites in the project study
area. Dominant species located here include longleaf pine, loblolly pine,
live oak, sassafras, blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosym), grape, Japanese
honeysuckle, red maple, sweet gum, black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), and
yellow jessamine (Gelsemium sempervirens).
d. Mixed Pine-Hardwood Forest
This community is the dominant forested community in the project
study area. The canopy and subcanopy is dominated by longleaf pine and
loblolly pine as well as several species of hardwoods including post oak
(Ouercus stellata), black oak (O. velutina), water oak, scrubby post oak,
turkey oak (O. laevis), willow oak, blackjack oak, American holly (Ilex
opaca), sassafras, black cherry, hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), blueberry,
persimmon, Virginia magnolia (Aagnolia virginlana), and dogwood
(Cornus florida). Shrubs, herbs, and vines located here include grape,
wisteria, St. John's wort, spouted wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata),
winged sumac, goldenrod, poison oak, pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), titi
(Cyrilla racemiflora), and bitter gallberry (Ilex glabra).
33
C. Alluvial Swamp
This wetland community is located along the braided system of the
unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek. Dominant species located here include
tag alder (Alnus serrulata), black gum, red maple, titi, pepperbush, Virginia
magnolia, sweet gum, blueberry, cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamornuea),
black stem chain fern (li?oodit,ardia viglnica), netted chain fern (11'.
areolata), winterberry (Ilex verticillata), wax myrtle, possum haw
(Viburnum nudum), arrow arum (Peltandra vlrglnica), sensitive fern
(Onoclea sensibilis), elderberry, lizard's tail (Saururus cernuus), jewel
weed (Impatiens capensis), swamp dog hobble (Leucothoe axillaris), and
privet (Ligustrum sinense).
6. Faunal Component
Much of the wildlife in the project study area likely use various
communities for forage, cover, and nesting habitat. Many species are highly
adaptive and may utilize the edges of forests and clearings. In addition, many
species utilize both aquatic and terrestrial habitats, such that both are required for
survival and reproduction.
The raccoon* (Procyon lotor) is a carnivore often observed along wetland
habitats to moist upland forests as well as urban areas. White-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus) are occasionally observed along broken areas of mixed
young forests and abandoned fields. These two ubiquitous species are often
observed as roadkill on adjacent roadways. Striped bark was observed on several
hardwoods adjacent to the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek. This is indicative of
beaver* (Castor canadensis) activity; however, there was no sign of a beaver dam
on this tributary.
The least shrew (Cryptotis parva), eastern harvest mouse (Reithrodontonrys
humulis), and hispid cotton rat (Signuodon hispidus) frequent disturbed or open
areas dominated by herbaceous vegetation which provide foraging and nesting
habitat. Eastern cottontails* (SylvilagusJloridanus) prefer brushy edges where they
primarily feed on woody perennials.
Mammals commonly occurring in forested habitats include southern short-
tailed shrew (Blarina carolinensis), gray squirrel* (Sciurus carolinensis), and
cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus). Shrews and smaller mice prefer forests
with a thick laver of leaf litter. The cotton mouse specifically favors lowland
deciduous forests, swamps, and pine-hardwood forests.
Eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) and five-lined skink* (Eunueces
fasciatus) inhabit open habitats with plenty of sunlight. The slimy salamander
(Plethodon glutinosus) inhabits woodlands where they are known to forage at night
34
and spend the day in burrows under logs, stones, and leaf litter. The southern
dusky salamander (Desmognathus auriculatus) is abundant under leaf litter and
rotten logs in swamps throughout the coastal plain. The spring peeper (Hyla
crucifer) inhabits woodlands where it may be observed under forest litter or brushy
undergrowth. Southern toads* (Bufo terrestris) prefers sandy, friable soils, the
common soils located in the upland forested tracts in the project study area. The
Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) was freqently observed in upland sites
throughout the project. Eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina) are commonly
observed throughout forested habitats where they feed on plants and small animals.
Mourning doves* and house finch* (Carpodacus mexicanus) were observed
on power lines along Legion Road. Yellow-bellied sapsucker* (Sphyrapicus
varius) and cardinal* (Cardinalis cardinalis) were observed in a longleaf pine-
turkey oak ridge and a rufous-sided towhee* (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) was noted
in a thicket adjacent to a power line easement. These communities are not located
within the proposed ROW, but these avian species likely utilize portions of the
project study area.
Blue jays* (Cyannocitta cristata) and mockingbird* (Min:us polyglottos)
were observed in maintained yards throughout the project. The common crow*
(Corvus brachyrhynchos), cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), and mourning dove
(Zenaida macroura) were observed in the abandoned fields. The pileated
woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus), red-bellied woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus)
northern parula (Parula anrericana), and blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila
caerulea) are often observed in wet, deciduous woods. Many avian species
including tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor), brown-headed nuthatch (Sitta pusilla),
and pine warbler (Dendroica pinus) are commonly observed in hardwood and
mixed pine-hardwood forests throughout the southern coastal plain.
Aquatic Communities
Two aquatic community types, coastal plain perennial stream, and small
lake are located in the project study area. Physical characteristics of the surface
waters and condition of the water influence the faunal composition of the aquatic
communities.
Perennial, braided streams support an assemblage of fauna that require a
constant source of flowing water, as compared to intermittent or standing water.
Amphibians and reptiles commonly observed in and adjacent to swamps include
three-lined salamander (Eurycea guttolineata), two-lined salamander (E.
bislineata), Mabee's salamander (Ambystoma mabeei), green frog (Rana
clamitans), pickerel frog (R. palustris), spring peeper (Hyla crucifer) and banded
water snake (Nerodia fasciata). The southern cricket frog (Acris gryllus) and
green treefrog (Hyla cinerea) are abundant in grassy margins of ponds.
35
According to Fish (1968), Beaver Creek is described as providing good
fishing for chain pickerel (Esox niger), redbreast sunfish (Lepomis aurinls). bluegill
(L. ntacrochirus), and largemouth bass (,jficropterus sahnoides). Other species
commonly observed in alluvial swamps with soft bottoms include golden shiner
(Notemigonus crysoleucas), madtom (Notorus sp.) and eastern mosquitofish
(Gambusia holbrooki).
8. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Resources
" Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic
resources described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources
have the potential to impact biological functions. This section quantifies and
qualifies impacts to the natural resources in terms of the ecosystems affected.
Calculated impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative abundance
of each community (Table 8). Project construction will result in the clearing and
degradation of portions of these communities. Estimated impacts are derived using
the proposed functional design outlined in Section III.E of this report.
Table 8. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities.
Community Alternate 1 Alternate z
ha (ac) lia(ac)
Disturbed 9.0 (22.2) 9.5 (23.3)
Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.1 (0.2) 0.1 (0.2)
Pine Forest 0.3(0.7)
--
Mixed Pine-Hardwood Forest 1.1 (2.8) 0.3 (0.7)
Alluvial Floodplain 0.2 (0.4) 0.1 (0.1)
TOTAL 10.7 (26.3) 10.0 (24.3)
The biotic communities found within the project study area will be altered
as a result of project construction. Terrestrial communities serve as nesting,
foraging, and shelter habitat for fauna. The majority of the project study area is
located in disturbed habitat. This area is currently in a highly altered state and
plants and animals here are well adapted to disturbed conditions. Flora and fauna
occurring in the disturbed community are common throughout North Carolina
because of their ability to persist in disturbed habitats. Moreover, similar
additional disturbed habitats will be re-established after project construction.
Portions of Alternate 1 are located on new location, resulting in increased
impacts to forested communities, specifically mixed pine-hardwood forest, pine
forest, mixed hardwood forest, and alluvial swamp. This large forest area will be
fragmented by the construction of this alternate, resulting in the forested tract
becoming smaller. Many vertebrates and insects have restrictive habitat
requirements and the resulting landscape disturbance may affect the long-term
viability of these species to persist once their habitats are fragmented. The
36
construction of this alternate may create a barrier to gene flow between populations
on either side of the road. Fragmentation of gene pools could affect the ability of
some plant and animal populations to persist under harsh environmental conditions.
Species adapted to disturbed and edge habitat will thrive. while species
which require large, undisturbed tracts will decrease or disappear due to
competition or habitat reduction. Additionally, these land parcels serve as natural
corridors for animal migration, as well as refuges for animals forced from other
disturbed habitats.
Clearing and conversion of this forested tract for roadway development
eliminates nesting, foraging, and shelter habitat for faunal organisms. Many
forested systems offer all of the necessary components (i.e. food, water, cover) to
support vertebrate species. The loss of this habitat will displace animals from this
area as they search for additional habitat. This may concentrate animals into a
smaller area which can cause degradation of remaining habitat and increased
mortality due to disease, predation, and starvation. Individual mortalities are likely
to occur to terrestrial animals (moles, shrews, snakes, etc.) from construction
machinery used during clearing activities.
Construction activities will impact the water resources located in the project
area as well as those downstream. Increased sedimentation and siltation is often
directly attributable to construction activities. The suspended particles will clog the
feeding mechanisms of benthic organisms, fish, and amphibians. These impacts
eventually are magnified throughout the food chain and ultimately affect organisms
located in higher trophic levels. Strict erosion and sedimentation controls should
be maintained during the entire life of the project.
Construction activities often affect water level and flow due to interruption
and/or additions to surface and groundwater flow. The change in water level may
severely impact spawning activities of mobile and sessile organisms. Construction
runoff and highway spills may result in mortality to aquatic species inhabiting the
water resources located in the project area.
The construction of this project will likely increase vehicular use in the
project vicinity. This will directly lead to an increase in concentrations of toxic
compounds which may be carried into water resources via precipitation, sheet flow,
and subsurface drainage. Wildlife crossings will become difficult and will result in
an increase in roadkills.
Quantitative differences with regard to cumulative impacts in the proposed
impact width exist between alternatives. Additionally, fragmentation of forested
tracts bordering drainageways is a concern. Alternative 1 has reduced quantitative
cumulative biotic community impacts when compared to other alternatives.
37
9. Jurisdictional Issues
This section provides descriptions, inventories and impact analysis pertinent
to two important issues--Waters of the United States and Protected and Rare
Species.
Y
10. Waters of the United States
Surface waters and jurisdictional wetlands fall under the broad category of
"Waters of the United States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal
Register (CFR) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that
are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration
sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Surface waters are
waters used in interstate or foreign commerce, waters subject to the ebb and flow of
tides, all interstate waters including interstate wetlands, and all other waters such as
intrastate lakes, rivers, and streams. Any action that proposes to place fill material
into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. 1344).
a. Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
The unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek is considered a
jurisdictional surface water. This tributary is thoroughly described in
Section IV.C.3.b of this document. Two wetland sites are located in the
project study area:
Wetland site 1-located along the braided system of the unnamed
tributary on the new location portion of Alternative 1. Species
observed here include black-stem chain fern, privet, tag alder, black
gum, red maple, swamp dog hobble, blueberry, and cinnamon fern.
The sandy clay loam soil at this site exhibited a soil color of l OYR
3/1 in the A layer. Observations of wetland hydrology include
inundation, saturation, water marks, and drift lines.
Wetland site 2-located along the braided system of the unnamed
triburary on the widening portion of Alternate 2. Species observed
here include black gum, sweet gum, Amercan elm, and greenbrier.
The sandy clay loam soil at this site exhibited a matrix soil color of
l OYR 4/2 with l OYR 4/1 mottles in the AE layer. Observations of
wetland hydrology include water marks, oxidized rhizospheres
within 30 cm (12 in), and water-stained leaves.
38
b. Summary of Anticipated Impacts
The proposed project will cross jurisdictional surface waters and
wetlands. Impacts are summarized in Table 9. The amount of -Vvetland and
surface water impacts may be modified by any changes in roadway design.
Alternate 1 will avoid impacts to wetland 1 by bridging in that area.
Impacts to wetland 2 and the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek on
Alternate 2 are based on a functional design of extending the existing
culvert at this crossing. The amount of wetland and surface water impacts
may be modified by any changes in roadway design.
Table 9. Anticipated impacts to wetlands and surface waters.
Site Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Alternate 1 Alternate 2
Surface Water Surface Water Wetland Wetland
Impacts Impacts Impact ha (ac) Impact ha (ac)
Linear in (ft) Linear m (ft)
UT Beaver 0 4.8 (15.8) -- --
Ck.
Wetland 1 -- -- 0 0
Wetland 2 -- -- 0 0.052 (0.128)
TOTAL 0 4.8 (15.8) 0 0.052 (0.128)
Two systems are currently being used in North Carolina to describe
or rate wetlands: a classification system developed by Cowardin et al.
(1979) and a numerical rating system developed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management (DEM, 1995). The Cowardin
system provides a uniform approach in describing concepts and terms used
in classifying wetland systems. Wetlands 1 and 2 have a Cowardin
Classification of PFOIH (Palustrine, Forested, Broad-leaved deciduous
with a water regime that is Permanently Flooded).
The DEM rating scale gauges wetland quality using a numerical
rating system (0-100 with 100 being the highest value) that emphasizes
water storage, bank/shoreline stabilization, pollutant removal, wildlife
habitat, aquatic life values, and recreation/ education potential. Wetlands 1
and 2 have a DEM rating of 80. The DEM rating may be revised when a
wetland delineation is conducted at the project study area.
Construction impacts can severely affect the functions that wetlands
perform in an ecosystem. Wetlands influence regional water flow regimes
by intercepting and storing storm water runoff which ultimately reduces the
danger of flooding in surrounding and downstream areas. Wetlands have
been documented to remove organic and inorganic nutrients and toxic
materials from water that flows through them. The presence of wetlands
adjacent to roadways can act as filters to runoff pollutants and toxins.
39
C. Permits
Impacts to wetlands are anticipated from project construction. In
accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit
will be required from the COE for discharge of dredge or fill material into
"Waters of the United States." Due to wetland and surface water impacts, a
Section 404 Nationwide 14 Permit will likely be necessary for this project.

PROPOSED Nationwide 14 Permit: Linear Transportation Crossings.
A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (14) is
applicable for activities required for the construction, expansion,
modification or improvement of linear transportation crossings (e.g.,
highways, railways, trails, airport runways, and taxiways) in waters of the
United States, including wetlands, provided that the activity meets the
following criteria:
a. For public linear transportation crossings, the discharge is limited
to non-tidal waters of the United States, excluding non-tidal
wetlands contiguous to tidal waters, and does not cause the loss
of greater than 2 acres (1 acre)* of non-tidal waters of the United
States;
b. For private linear transportation crossings in waters of the United
States or public linear transportation crossings in tidal waters or
in non-tidal wetlands contiguous to tidal waters, the discharge
does not cause the loss of greater than 1/3 acre of waters of the
United States, including wetlands, and the length of the fill for the
crossing in waters of the United States is limited to 200 linear
feet;
c. The permittee notifies the District Engineer in accordance with
the "Notification" general condition for discharges into special
aquatic sites, including wetlands, or that cause the loss of greater
than 1 /3 acre of waters of the United States;
d. For public linear transportation crossings, the notification must
include a mitigation proposal that will offset the loss of waters of
the United States;
e. For discharges in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, the
notification must include a delineation of the affected special
aquatic sites;
40
f. The width of the fill is limited to the minimum necessary for the
crossing;
g. This NWP cannot be used to channelize a stream, and any work
authorized must not cause more than minor changes to the
hydraulic flow characteristics of the stream, increase flooding, or
measurably degrade water quality (See General Conditions 9 and
22); and
h. The crossing is part of a single and complete project for crossing
a water of the United States. Some discharges for crossings may
be eligible for an exemption from the need for a Section 404
permit (see 33 CFR 323.4). (Sections 10 and 404)
*Note: For the purposes of this proposed modification to NWP 14, a
discussion of acreage threshold options being considered for NWP 14 is
provided in the preamble.
This project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the
DWQ prior to the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the
CWA requires that the state issue or deny water certification for any
federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in a discharge to
Waters of the United States. The issuance of a 401 permit from the DWQ is
a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
d. Mitigation
The COE has adopted, through the Council of Environmental
Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the concept of
"no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to
maintain and restore the chemical, biological and physical integrity of
Waters of the United States, specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland
impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding impacts (to
wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three
aspects (avoidance, minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered sequentially.
41
1. Avoidance
IL
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and
practicable possibilities of averting impacts to Waters of the United
States. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the Environmental Protection Agency and the COE, in
determining "appropriate and practicable" measures to offset
unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to the
scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost,
existing technology and logistics in light of overall project purposes.
Wetland site 1 will be avoided by bridging.
2. Minimization
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and
practicable steps to reduce the adverse impacts to Waters of the
United States. Implementation of these steps will be required
through project modifications and permit conditions. Impacts to the
wetland could be minimized by:
- Decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through
the reduction of ROW widths, fill slopes and/or road shoulder
widths.
- Installation of temporary silt fences, earth berms, and
temporary ground cover during construction.
- Strict enforcement of sedimentation and erosion control
BMPs for the protection of surface waters and wetlands.
- Reduction of clearing and grubbing activity in and adjacent
to water bodies and wetlands.
3. Compensatory Mitigation
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until
anticipated impacts to Waters of the United States have been
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is
recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may
not be achieved in each and every permit action. Appropriate and
practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable,
adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable
minimization has been required. Compensatory actions often
include restoration, creation and enhancement of Waters of the
United States. Such actions should be undertaken in areas adjacent
42
to or contiguous to the discharge site. It is not anticipated that
compensatory mitigation will be necessary.
11. Protected and Rare Species
` Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of
decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human
activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act [ESA]
of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a species
l classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the FWS. Other species
may receive additional protection under separate state laws.
Federally-protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered,
Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected
under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA. As of 3 January
2000, there are eight federally-protected species listed for Cumberland
County (Table 10). A brief description of each Endangered or Threatened
species characteristics and habitat follows.
Table 10. Federally protected species for Cumberland County.
Common Name Scientific Name Status'
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T(S/A)
red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
St. Francis' satyr Neonympha mitchellii francisci Endangered
small-whorled pogonia* Isotria medeloides Threatened
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia Endangered
rough-leaved loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
American chaffseed Schivalbea americana Endangered
Endangered=a taxon in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range.
Threatened=a taxon likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range.
T(S/A) Threatened due to similarity of appearance=a taxon that is threatened due to
similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for protection. These species
are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
This includes the American alligator.
* indicates the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
43
Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac)
Plant Family: Anacardiaceae
Federally Listed: 28 September 1989
Flowers Present: June
• Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub. The bases of the leaflets
are rounded and their edges are simply or doubly serrate. The flowers of Michaux's sumac
are greenish to white in color. Fruits, which develop from August to September on female
plants, are a red densely short-pubescent drupe.
This plant occurs in rocky or sandy open woods as well as areas that are artificially
disturbed including highway and railroad right-of-ways, edges of cultivated fields, and other
cleared land. Michaux's sumac is dependent on some sort of disturbance to maintain the
openness of its habitat. It usually grows in association with basic soils and occurs on sand
or sandy loams. Michaux's sumac grows only in open habitat where it can get full sunlight.
Michaux's sumac does not compete well with other species, such as Japanese honeysuckle,
with which it is often associated.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present along the irregularly maintained
roadside shoulder, powerline corridor and forest/maintained ecotone. A plant-by-plant
survey was conducted during the site visits on on 1 April 1998, 26 May 1998, 30 June
1998, and 31 July 1998. No populations of Michaux's sumac were observed during the
site visits. A review of the NHP rare species and unique habitat database did not reveal the
presence of Michaux's sumac within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project area. Impacts to
Michaux's sumac will not occur from project construction.
Neonympha mitchellii francisci (Saint Francis' satyr)
Animal Family: Nymphalidae
Federally Listed: Emergency listed 18 April, 1994
The Saint Francis' satyr is a small, dark brown butterfly with conspicuous eyespots
on the lower wing surface of the fore and hind legs. The eyespots are round to oval shaped
with a dark maroon brown center and a straw yellow border. These spots are accentuated
with two bright orange bands along the posterior wings and by two darker brown bands
along the central portion of each wing.
The Saint Francis' satyr is known to inhabit wide, wet meadows dominated by sedges
and other wetland graminoids. These wetlands are often relicts of beaver activity and are
boggy areas that are acidic and ephemeral. Succession of these sites often leads to either a
pocosin or swamp dominated forest. The larval host of the Saint Francis' satyr is thought to
be grasses, sedges and rushes.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
The project area is comprised of disturbed communities. mixed pine-hardwood
forest, mixed pine forest, mixed hardwood forest and alluvial swamp. There are no wet
meadows located in the project study area. A review of the NHP rare species and unique
44
habitat database did not reveal the presence of St. Francis' Satyr within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of
the project area. Impacts to this species will not occur from project construction.
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker)
Animal Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 13 October, 1970
The adult red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) has a plumage that is entirely black and
white except for small red streaks on the sides of the nape in the male. The back of the
RCW is black and white with horizontal stripes. The breast and underside of this
woodpecker are white with streaked flanks. The RCW has a large white cheek patch
surrounded by the black cap, nape, and throat.
The RCW uses open old growth stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine,
for foraging and nesting habitat. A forested stand must contain at least 50% pine, lack a
thick understory, and be contiguous with other stands to be appropriate habitat for the RCW.
These birds nest exclusively in trees that are >60 years old and are contiguous with pine
stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range of the RCW is up to 200.0 ha (500.0 ac).
This acreage must be contiguous with suitable nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually in trees that are
infected with the fungus that causes red-heart disease. Cavities are located in colonies from
3.6-30.3 m (12.0-100.0 ft) above the ground and average 9.1- 15.7 m (30.0-50.0 ft) high.
They can be identified by a large incrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The
RCW lays its eggs in April, May, and June; the eggs hatch approximately 38 days later.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Suitable habitat for the RCW is not located in the project study area. Scattered
longleaf and loblolly pine trees >60 years old are present in this project study area; however,
the tree stands are not contiguous to other pine stands greater than 30 years of age.
Accordingly, suitable nesting and foraging habitat for RCW is not located in the project
study area. A review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats did not reveal
any RCW nesting or occurrences within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area.
Therefore, construction of this project will have no impact on the RCW.
Lindera melissifolia (pondberry)
Plant Family: Lauraceae
Federally Listed: July 31, 1986
Flowers Present: March - early April
Fruits Present: June and July
Pondberry is a deciduous, aromatic shrub that has a distinct sassafras-like odor.
Leaves in the pondberry are arranged alternately, have rounded bases, and droop downward.
It has small pale yellow flowers that appear in early spring before the leaves. The fruit
which matures in August or September is a bright red drupe.
Pondberry grows in lowland habitats with hydric soils. These sites are generally
flooded at some time during the growing season. It is associated with the margins of sinks,
ponds, and other like depressions including seasonally wet, low areas among bottomland
hardwoods. The soils present are sandy with a high peat content in the subsurface. Areas
inhabited by this species show signs of past fire maintenance and now have shrubby
45
conditions. The plants generally grow in shady areas but may also be found in areas that
receive full sunlight.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Suitable habitat for pondberry is present in the wetland portion of the alluvial swamp
adjacent to the unnamed tributrary to Beaver Creek. A plant-by-plant survey was conducted
during the 30 June 1998 site visit. Pondberry was not observed during this site visit. A
review of the NHP rare species and unique habitat database did not reveal the presence of
pondberry within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project area. Impacts to this species will not occur
_ from project construction.
Lysinzachia asperulaefolia (rough-leaved loosestrife)
Plant Family: Primulaceae
Federally Listed: June 12, 1987
Flowers Present: June
Rough-leaved loosestrife is a perennial herb having slender stems and whorled
leaves. This herb has showy yellow flowers which usually occur in threes or fours. Fruits
are present from July through October.
Rough-leaved loosestrife is endemic to the coastal plain and sandhills of North and
South Carolina. This species occurs in the ecotones or edges between longleaf pine uplands
and pond pine pocosins (areas of dense shrub and vine growth usually on a wet, peat, poorly
drained soil), on moist to seasonally saturated sands and on shallow organic soils overlaying
sand. It has also been found to occur on deep peat in the low shrub community of large
Carolina bays (shallow, elliptical, poorly drained depressions of unknown origins), pine
flatwoods, and pocosins. The areas it occurs in are fire maintained. Rough-leaved
loosestrife rarely occurs in association with hardwood stands and prefers acidic soils.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
Suitable habitat for rough-leaved loosestrife is present in the project study area,
along the alluvial swamp/mixed pine-hardwood forest ecotone. A plant-by-plant survey was
conducted during the 30 June 1998 site visit. Rough-leaved loosestrife was not observed
during this site visit. A review of the NHP rare species and unique habitat database did not
reveal the presence of rough-leaved loosestrife within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project area.
Impacts to this species will not occur from project construction.
Schwalbea anzericana (American chaffseed)
Plant Family: Scrophulariaceae
Federally Listed: October 1991
Flowers Present: late May-early June
American chaffseed is an erect herb whose stems branch only at the base (if at all).
The entire plant is pubescent, with upwardly curving hairs. The narrow leaves are alternate,
lance-shaped to elliptic and stalkless. The leaves are three veined and become progressively
smaller towards the top. It bears solitary flowers in the axils of the upper most leaves. The
purplish-yellow flowers are arranged into racemes. The fruits are a long narrow capsule,
enclosed in a loose-fitting sack-like structure.
46
American chaffseed occurs in open. moist pine flatwoods, fire maintained savannas.
edges of cypress ponds, ecotonal areas between peat wetlands and open grass-sedge
systems. Soils are generally sandy, acidic, and seasonally moist to dry. Fire is important in
the maintenance of open habitat for the American chaffseed.
Biological Conclusion No Effect
The project study area is dominated by disturbed areas, upland forests, and alluvial
swamp. Accordingly, suitable habitat for American chaffseed is not present in the proposed
right-of-way. A review of the NHP rare species and unique habitat database did not reveal
the presence of American chaffseed within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project area. Impacts to
this species will not occur from project construction.
Isotria medeoloides (small whorled pogonia) Threatened
Plant Family: Orchidaceae
Federally Listed: 10 September, 1982
Flowers Present: mid May-mid June
Small whorled pogonia is a perennial orchid having long pubescent roots and a
hollow stem. Stems terminate in a whorl of five or six light green, elliptical leaves that are
somewhat pointed. One or two light green flowers are produced at the end of the stem.
Flowers of small-whorled pogonia have short sepals.
The small whorled pogonia grows in "second growth deciduous" or deciduous-
coniferous forests, with an open canopy, open shrub layer, and sparse herb layer. It prefers
acidic soils. Flowering is inhibited in areas where there is relatively high shrub coverage or
high sapling density.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION: No Effect
Habitat for small-whorled pogonia does exist in the project study area, specifically
within the mixed pine-hardwood forest, pine forest, and mixed hardwood forest. A plant-
by-plant survey for this species was conducted on 15 April 1998 and 26 May 1998. No
populations of small-whorled pogonia were observed during the site visits. A review of the
NHP rare species and unique habitat database did not reveal any populations of small-
whorled pogonia within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area. Impacts to small-whorled
pogonia will not occur from project construction.
b. Federal Species of Concern and State Listed Species
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are those plant and animal
species which may or may not be listed in the future. Twenty-eight FSC are
listed for Cumberland County (Table 11).
47
Table 11 Federal Species of Concern.
_
Common Name Scientific Name NC Habitat
Status
Bachman's sparrow Aimophila aestivalis SC Yes
Carolina gopher frog Rana capito capito SC(PT) Yes
southern hognose snake Heterodon sinnis SR Yes
northern pine snake Pituophis melanoleucus SC Yes
melanoleucus
Atlantic pigtoe Fusconaia masoni T Yes
yellow lampmussel Lanipsilis carioca T Yes
Georgia indigo bush Amorpha georgiana var. T No

Sandhills milkvetch georgiana
Astragalus michauxii
C/PT
No
Venus flytrap Dionea muscipula C-SC No
resinous boneset Eupatormin resinosum T-SC Yes
white wicky Kalmia cuneata E-SC/PC No
Sandhills bog lilly Lilium iridollae C/PT No
bog spicebush Lindera subcoriacea E No
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis C No
Boykin's lobelia Lobelia boykinii C No
loose watermilfoil Alyriophyllum laxun: T No
savanna cowbane Oxypolis ternata W1 No
Carolina grass-of- Parnassia caroliniana E No
Parnassus
wavyleaf wild quinine
Parthenium radfordii
W2
No
conferva pondweed Potamogeton con fervoides C No
spiked medusa Pteroglossaspis ecristata E Yes
Sandhills pyxie-moss Pyxidanthera barbulata E No
var. bargulata
awned meadowbeauty Rhexia aristosa T No
Carolina goldenrod Solidago pulchra E No
spring-flowering Solidago verna E/PT No
oldenrod
b
Pickering's dawnflower Stylisma pickeringii E No
var. pickeringii
Carolina asphodel Tofieldia glabra C No
roughleaf yellow-eyed Xyris scabrifolia C No
grass
Threatened (T) are native or once-native species of wild plant or
animal which are likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. An
Endangered (E) species is any native species or once-native species of fauna
or flora whose continued existence as a viable component of the State's
flora or fauna is determined to be in jeopardy. Significantly rare (SR)
species are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in
the state. Special Concern (SC) species require monitoring but which may
be collected and sold under regulations adopted under provisions of the
Plant Protection and Conservation Act. Proposed Threatened (PT) are
48
species which have been formally proposed for listing as Threatened. but
has not yet completed the legally mandated listing process. Candidate (C)
species are very rare in North Carolina, with 1-20 populations in the state.
generally substantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction. Proposed
Candidate (PC) are species which have been formally proposed for listing
as Candidate but has not )let completed the legally mandated listing process.
Watch Category 1 (WI) includes rare species whose status in North
Carolina is relatively well known and which appear to be relatively secure
at this time. Watch Category 2 (W2) includes species with questionable
taxonomy, including taxa of dubious validity and taxa under study and
potentially to be named.
FSC species are not afforded federal protection under the ESA and
are not subject to any of its provisions, including Section 7, until they are
formally proposed or listed as Threatened or Endangered. Organisms which
are listed as Endangered (E), Threatened (T) or Special Concern (SC) by the
NHP list of Rare Plant and Animal species are afforded state protection
under the State ESA and the North Carolina Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979; however, the level of protection given to state
listed species does not apply to NCDOT activities.
A review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats
did not reveal the presence of these species or unique habitats in or near the
project study area. Surveys for the above-mentioned species were not
conducted during the site visit, nor were these species observed during the
site visit.
12. Flood Hazard Evaluation
The terrain in the project vicinity is relatively flat and poorly drained;
therefore, some offsite drainage easements may be needed to convey runoff to
adequate outfalls. There is one major stream crossing involved with this project,
located at a tributary to Beaver Creek (designated as Tributary A in the FEMA
flood insurance study). It is located approximately 500 feet (150 meters) north of
SR 1327 on the new location section of the proposed roadway.
Cumberland County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance
Regular Program. The crossing of Beaver Creek Tributary A is in a designated
flood hazard zone and is included in a detailed flood study, with an established
floodway and corresponding regulatory water surface elevations. It is anticipated
that the new crossing will require a flood way modification. The Hydraulics
Design Unit of NCDOT will coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management
Agency and local authorities in the final hydraulics design stage regarding the
floodway modification and to ensure compliance with applicable floodplain
ordinances. The floodplain in the vicinity of the Beaver Creek Tributary A
49
crossing is rural and wooded. No buildings in the vicinity Nvith floor elevations
below the 100-year flood level were observed. The proposed roadway widening
and associated drainage accommodations will not have a significant adverse effect
on the existing floodplain areas nor on the associated flood hazards in the project
vicinity.
13. Water Quality
The project is not in a water supply watershed, nor in a high quality water
zone; therefore, erosion and sedimentation will be controlled through the
appropriate specification, installation, and maintenance of standard erosion and
sedimentation control measures. Beaver Creek Tributary A is the only
jurisdictional stream that will be affected by the project. Existing drainage patterns
will be maintained and improved to the extent practicable. Groundwater resources
will be assessed in final hydraulic designs to ensure that measures are taken, if
necessary, to prevent contamination.
14. Hiehwav Traffic Noise/Construction Noise Analysis
Traffic noise and construction noise, appearing as Part 772 of Title 23 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination
and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating
the noise impacts must be considered.
Characteristics of Noise
Noise is basically defined as unwanted sound. It is emitted from
many sources including airplanes, factories, railroads, power generation
plants, and highway vehicles. Highway noise, or traffic noise, is usually a
composite of noises from engine exhaust, drive train, and tire-roadway
interaction.
The magnitude of noise is usually described by its sound pressure.
Since the range of sound pressure varies greatly, a logarithmic scale is used
to relate sound pressures to some common reference level, usually the
decibel (dB). Sound pressures described in decibels are called sound
pressure levels and are often defined in terms of frequency weighted scales
(A, B, C, or D).
The weighted-A decibel scale is used almost exclusively in vehicle
noise measurements because it places the most emphasis on the frequency
range to which the human ear is most sensitive (1,000-6,000 Hertz). Sound
levels measured using a weighted-A decibel scale are often expressed as
dBA. Throughout this report, all noise levels will be expressed in dBA's.
50
Several examples of noise pressure levels in dBA are listed in Table N 1
(Appendix 2. page A2-5).
Review of Table N 1 indicates that most individuals in urbanized
areas are exposed to fairly high noise levels from many sources as they go
about their daily activities. The degree of disturbance or annoyance of
unwanted sound depends essentially on three things:
1) The amount and nature of the intruding noise.
2) The relationship between the background noise and the intruding
noise.
3) The type of activity occurring when the noise is heard.
In considering the first of these three factors, it is important to note
that individuals have different sensitivity to noise. Loud noises bother some
more than others and some individuals become upset if an unwanted noise
persists. The time patterns of noise also enter into an individual's
judgement of whether or not a noise is offensive. For example, noises
occurring during sleeping hours are usually considered to be more offensive
than the same noises in the daytime.
With regard to the second factor, individuals tend to judge the
annoyance of an unwanted noise in terms of its relationship to noise from
other sources (background noise). The blowing of a car horn at night when
background noise levels are approximately 45 dBA would generally be
more objectionable than the blowing of a car horn in the afternoon when
background noises might be 55 dBA.
The third factor is related to the interference of noise with activities
of individuals. In a 60 dBA environment, normal conversation would be
possible while sleep might be difficult. Work activities requiring high
levels of concentration may be interrupted by loud noises while activities
requiring manual effort may not be interrupted to the same degree.
Over time, particularly if the noises occur at predicted intervals and
are expected, individuals tend to accept the noises which intrude into their
lives. Attempts have been made to regulate many of these types of noises
including airplane noise, factory noise, railroad noise, and highway traffic
noise. In relation to highway traffic noise, methods of analysis and control
have developed rapidly over the past few years.
51
b. Noise Abatement Criteria
In order to determine whether highway noise levels are or are not
compatible with various land uses, the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) has developed noise abatement criteria (NAC) and procedures to
be used in the planning and design of highways. These abatement criteria
and procedures are set forth in the aforementioned Federal reference (Title
23 CFR Part 772). A summary of the noise abatement criteria for various
land uses is presented in Table N2 (Appendix 2, page A2-6). The Leq, or
equivalent sound level, is the level of constant sound which in a given
situation and time period has the same energy as does time varying sound.
In other words, the fluctuating sound levels of traffic noise are represented
in terms of a steady noise level with the same energy content.
Ambient Noise Levels
Ambient noise measurements were taken in the vicinity of the
project to determine ambient (existing) noise levels for the identified land
uses. The purpose of this noise level information was to quantify the
existing acoustic environment and to provide a base for assessing the impact
of noise level increases. The existing Leq noise levels in the project area as
measured at 15 meters from the nearest roadway ranged from 63.2 to 67.6
dBA. The ambient measurement locations and measured exterior Leq noise
levels are presented in Figure N1 (Appendix 2, page A2-25) and Table N3
(Appendix 2, page A2-7), respectively. In areas where traffic noise was not
the predominate noise source, a background noise level of 45 dBA was
determined.
The existing roadway and traffic conditions were used with the most
current traffic noise prediction model in order to calculate existing noise
levels for comparison with noise levels actually measured. The calculated
existing noise levels averaged 1.2 dBA higher than the measured noise
levels for the locations where noise measurement were obtained. Hence,
the computer model is a reliable tool in the prediction of noise levels.
Differences in dBA levels can be attributed to "bunching" of vehicles, low
traffic volumes, and actual vehicle speeds versus the computer's "evenly-
spaced" vehicles and single vehicular speed.
d. Procedures for Predicting Future Noise Levels
In general, the traffic situation is composed of a large number of
variables which describe different cars driving at different speeds through a
continual changing highway configuration and surrounding terrain. Due to
the complexity of the problem, certain assumptions and simplifications
must be made to predict highway traffic noise. The procedure used to
52
predict future noise levels in this study was the Noise Barrier Cost
Reduction Procedure, STAMINA 2.0 and OPTIMA (revised March. 1983).
The BCR (Barrier Cost Reduction) procedure is based upon the FHWA
Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD-77-108). The BCR
traffic noise prediction model uses the number and type of vehicles on the
planned roadway, their speeds. the physical characteristics of the road
(curves, hills, depressed, elevated, etc.), receptor location and height, and, if
applicable, barrier type, barrier ground elevation, and barrier top elevation.
e. Traffic Noise Impacts and Noise Contours
Traffic noise impacts occur when the predicted traffic noise levels
either: [a] approach or exceed the FHWA noise abatement criteria (with
"approach" meaning within 1 dBA of the Table N2 value), or [b]
substantially exceed the existing noise levels. The NCDOT definition of
substantial increase is shown in the lower portion of Table N2.
Consideration for noise abatement measures must be given to receptors
which fall in either category.
In accordance with NCDOT Traffic Noise Abatement Policy, the
Federal/State governments are no longer responsible for providing noise
abatement measures for new development which building permits are issued
within the noise impact area of a proposed highway after the Date of Public
Knowledge. The Date of Public Knowledge of the location of a proposed
highway project will be the approval date of CEs, FONSIs, RODs, or the
Design Public Hearing, whichever comes later. For development occurring
after this public knowledge date, local governing bodies are responsible to
insure that noise compatible designs are utilized along the proposed facility.
Table N5 (Appendix 2, page A2-23) indicates the exterior traffic
noise level increases for the identified receptors for each alternative by
roadway section. No receptors are predicted to be impacted by a substantial
increase in exterior noise levels. The predicted noise level increases for this
project range up to +6 dBA. When real-life noises are heard, it is possible
barely to detect noise level changes of 2-3 dBA. A 5 dBA change is more
readily noticeable. A 10 dBA change is judged by most people as a
doubling or a halving of the loudness of the sound.
f. Traffic Noise Abatement Measures
If traffic noise impacts are predicted, examination and evaluation of
alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise
impacts must be considered. Consideration for noise abatement measures
must be given to all impacted receptors.
53
Highway Alignment
Highway alignment selection involves the horizontal or
vertical orientation of the proposed improvements in such a way as
to minimize impacts and costs. The selection of alternative
alignments for noise abatement purposes must consider the balance
between noise impacts and other engineering and environmental
parameters. For noise abatement, horizontal alignment selection is
primarily a matter of siting the roadway at a sufficient distance from
noise sensitive areas. Changing the highway alignment is not a
viable alternative for noise abatement.
Traffic System Management Measures
Traffic management measures which limit vehicle type,
speed, volume and time of operations are often effective noise
abatement measures. For this project, traffic management measures
are not considered appropriate for noise abatement due to their effect
on the capacity and level-of-service on the proposed roadway.
Noise Barriers
Physical measures to abate anticipated traffic noise levels can often
be applied with a measurable degree of success by the application of solid
mass, attenuable measures to effectively diffract, absorb, and reflect
highway traffic noise emissions. Solid mass, attenuable measures may
include earth berms or artificial abatement walls.
For a noise barrier to provide sufficient noise reduction it must be
high enough and long enough to shield the receptor from significant
sections of the highway. Access openings in the barrier severely reduce the
noise reduction provided by the barrier. It then becomes economically
unreasonable to construct a barrier for a small noise reduction. Safety at
access openings (driveways, crossing streets, etc.) due to restricted sight
distance is also a concern. Furthermore, to provide a sufficient reduction, a
barrier's length would normally be 8 times the distance from the barrier to
the receptor. For example, a receptor located 15 meters from the barrier
would normally require a barrier 120 meters long. An access opening of 12
meters (10 percent of the area) would limit its noise reduction to
approximately 4 dBA (FUNDAMENTAL AND ABATEMENT OF
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE, Report No. FHWA-HHI-HEV-7)-7976-1,
USDOT, chapter 5, section 3.2, page 5-27).
In addition, businesses, churches, and other related establishments
located along a particular highway normally require accessibility and high
visibility. Solid mass, attenuable measures for traffic noise abatement
54
would tend to disallow these two qualities. and thus. would not be
acceptable abatement measures in this case.
g. "Do Nothing" Alternative
The traffic noise impacts for the "do nothing" or "no-build"
alternative were also considered. If the traffic currently using the network
of roads in the project area should double, the future traffic noise levels
would only increase approximately 2-3 dBA. This small increase to present
• noise levels would be barely noticeable to the people working and living in
the area.
h. Construction Noise
The major construction elements of this project are expected to be
earth removal, hauling, grading, and paving. General construction noise
impacts, such as temporary speech interference for passers-by and those
individuals living or working near the project, can be expected particularly
from paving operations and from the earth moving equipment during
grading operations. However, considering the relatively short-term nature
of construction noise and the limitation of construction to daytime hours,
these impacts are not expected to be substantial. The transmission loss
characteristics of nearby natural elements and man-made structures are
believed to be sufficient to moderate the effects of intrusive construction
noise.
i. Summa
Based on these preliminary studies, traffic noise abatement is not
recommended, and no noise abatement measures are proposed. This
evaluation completes the highway traffic noise requirements of Title 23
CFR Part 772, and unless a major project change develops, no additional
noise reports will be submitted for this project.
15. Air Quality Analysis
Air pollution originates from various sources. Emissions from industry and
internal combustion engines are the most prevalent sources. The impact resulting
from highway construction ranges from intensifying existing air pollution problems
to improving the ambient air quality. The traffic is the center of concern when
determining the impact of a new highway facility or the improvement of an existing
highway facility. Motor vehicles emit carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxide
(NO), hydrocarbons (HC), particulate matter, sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead (Pb)
(listed in order of decreasing emission rate). Automobiles are considered to be the
major source of CO in the project area. For this reason, most of the analysis
55
presented is concerned with determining expected carbon monoxide levels in the
vicinity of the project due to traffic flow.
In order to determine the ambient CO concentration at a receptor near a
highway, two concentration components must be used: local and background. The
local concentration is defined as the CO emissions from cars operating on
highways in the near vicinity (i.e., distances within 100 meters) of the receptor
location. The background concentration is defined by the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources as "the concentration of
a pollutant at a point that is the result of emissions outside the local vicinity; that is,
the concentration at the upwind edge of the local sources."
In this study, the local concentration was determined by the NCDOT Traffic
Noise/Air Quality Staff using line source computer modeling and the background
component was obtained from the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR). Once the two concentration components were
resolved, they were added together to determine the ambient CO concentration for
the area in question and to compare to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS).
Automobiles are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides.
Hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides emitted from cars are carried into the
atmosphere where they react with sunlight to form ozone and nitrogen dioxide.
Automotive emissions of HC and NO are expected to decrease in the future due to
the continued installation and maintenance of pollution control devices on new
cars. However, regarding area-wide emissions, these technological improvements
may be offset by the increasing number of cars on the transportation facilities of the
area.
The photochemical reactions that form ozone and nitrogen dioxide require
several hours to occur. For this reason, the peak levels of ozone generally occur 10
to 20 kilometers downwind of the source of hydrocarbon emissions. Urban areas
as a whole are regarded as sources of hydrocarbons, not individual streets and
highways. The emissions of all sources in an urban area mix together in the
atmosphere, and in the presence of sunlight, the mixture reacts to form ozone,
nitrogen dioxide, and other photochemical oxidants. The best example of this type
of air pollution is the smog which forms in Los Angeles, California.
Automobiles are not regarded as significant sources of particulate matter
and sulfur dioxide. Nationwide, highway sources account for less than seven
percent of particulate matter emissions and less than two percent of sulfur dioxide
emissions. Particulate matter and sulfur dioxide emissions are predominantly the
result of non-highway sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, and agricultural).
Because emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide from automobiles are
56
very low, there is no reason to suspect that traffic on the project will cause air
quality standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide to be exceeded.
Automobiles without catalytic converters can burn regular gasoline. The
burning of regular gasoline emits lead as a result of regular gasoline containing
tetraethyl lead which is added by refineries to increase the octane rating of the fuel.
Newer cars with catalytic converters burn unleaded gasoline eliminating lead
emissions. Also, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
required the reduction in the lead content of leaded gasoline. The overall average
lead content of gasoline in 1974 was approximately 0.53 gram per liter. By 1989,
this composite average had dropped to 0.003 gram per liter. In the future, lead
emissions are expected to decrease as more cars use unleaded fuels and as the lead
content of leaded gasoline is reduced. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
make the sale, supply, or transport of leaded gasoline or lead additives unlawful
after December 31, 1995. Because of these reasons, it is not expected that traffic
on the proposed project will cause the NAAQS for lead to be exceeded.
A microscale air quality analysis was performed to determine future CO
concentrations resulting from the proposed highway improvements. "CAL3QHC -
A Modeling Methodology For Predicting Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadway
Intersections" was used to predict the CO concentration near sensitive receptors.
Inputs into the mathematical model to estimate hourly CO concentrations
consisted of a level roadway under normal conditions with predicted traffic
volumes, vehicle emission factors, and worst-case meteorological parameters. The
traffic volumes are based on the annual average daily traffic projections. Carbon
monoxide vehicle emission factors were calculated for the years 2000 and 2020,
using the EPA publication "Mobile Source Emission Factors", the MOBILESA
mobile source emissions computer model.
The background CO concentration for the project area was estimated to be
1.8 parts per million (ppm). Consultation with the Air Quality Section, Division of
Environmental Management (DEM), North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources indicated that an ambient CO concentration of 1.8 ppm is
suitable for most suburban and rural areas.
The worst-case air quality scenario was determined to be located along the
limits of the right-of-way at 15.25 meters from the centerline of the roadway. The
predicted 1-hour average CO concentrations for the evaluation build years of 2000
and 2020 are 2.4 and 2.6 ppm, respectively.
Comparison of the predicted CO concentrations with the NAAQS
(maximum permitted for 1-hour averaging period = 35 ppm; 8-hour averaging
period = 9 ppm) indicates no violation of these standards. Since the results of the
worst-case 1-hour CO analysis is less than 9 ppm, it can be concluded that the 8-
57
hour CO level does not exceed the standard. See Tables Al and A2 (Appendix 2,
pages A2-1.2) for input data and output.
During construction of the proposed project. all materials resulting from
clearing and grubbing, demolition or other operations will be removed from the
project, burned or otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Any burning done will
be done in accordance with applicable local laws and ordinances and regulations of
the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Care
will be taken to insure burning will be done at the greatest distance practical from
dwellings and not when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the
public. Burning will be performed under constant surveillance. Also during
construction, measures will be taken to reduce the dust generated by construction
when the control of dust is necessary for the protection and comfort of motorists or
area residents. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for air
quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and the NEPA process, and no
additional reports are necessary.
16 Hazardous Materials and UST Involvement
A field reconnaissance survey was done by Aquaterra, Inc. for this project.
Three facilities were found that currently operate UST (Underground Storage
Tanks) systems. At the time of the survey none of the three UST sites were
recorded on the D`'VQ incident list. NCDOT will conduct a site assessment of
underground storage facilities located within the project area prior to right of way
acquisition. If leaks and contamination has occurred, NCDOT will notify DWQ.
Also, an appropriate amount will be withheld from the property owner during right
of way acquisition for clean up.
The Geographical Information System (GIS) was consulted for this project.
The research shows no regulated or unregulated landfills within the project limits.
17. Construction Impacts
To minimize potential adverse effects caused by construction, the following
measures, along with those already mentioned, will be implemented during the
construction phase:
a. Waste and debris shall be disposed of in areas that are outside of the right-of-
way and provided by the Contractor, unless otherwise required by the plans
or special provision by the Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active
public waste or disposal areas will not be permitted without prior approval by
the Engineer. Such approval will not be permitted when, in the opinion of
the Engineer, it will result in excessive siltation or pollution. In addition,
disposal will not be done in wetland areas.
b. Borrow pits and all ditches will be drained insofar as possible to alleviate
breeding areas for mosquitoes.
58
C. Care will be taken not to block existing drainage ditches.
d. An extensive rodent control program will be established if structures are to be
removed or demolished
e. Telephone, water, sewer, and electric utilities exist along the project. The
Department of Transportation will hold a preconstruction conference between
the Department, the Contractor, representatives of the involved utility
companies, and pertinent local officials. Methods to coordinate utility
adjustments will be discussed at this conference. The contractor will prepare
a work schedule that minimizes possible damage to these utilities and
interruption of service.
During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting from
clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be removed from
the project and burned or otherwise disposed of by the Contractor. Any
burning done will be done in accordance with applicable local laws and
ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State Implementation Plan
for air quality. Care will be taken to insure burning will be done at the
greatest distance practicable from dwellings and not when atmospheric
conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public. Burning will be
performed under constant surveillance.
g. An erosion control schedule will be developed by the contractor before
starting work. The schedule will show the time relationship between phases
of the work that must be coordinated to reduce erosion and describe
construction practices and temporary erosion control measures that will be
used to minimize erosion. In conjunction with this schedule, the contractor
will be required to follow those provisions of the plans and specifications
pertaining to erosion and siltation. Temporary erosion control measures
such as berms, dikes, dams, silt basins, and others will be used as needed.
h. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for the use on this
project, the contractor shall obtain a certification from the State Historic
Preservation Officer of the State Department of Cultural Resources certifying
that the removal of the material from the borrow source will have no effect
on any known district, site, building, structure, or object that is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification shall be
furnished to the Engineer prior to performing any work on the proposed
borrow source.
i. Measures will be taken in allaying the dust generated by construction when
the control of dust is necessary for the protection and comfort of motorists or
area residents.
j. Traffic service in the immediate project area may be briefly disrupted
during construction. Efforts will be made to ensure the transportation needs
of the public will be met during and after construction.
k. Measures will be taken to ensure that sediment and erosion control devices
will not be placed in wetland areas, except for devices such as silt fences
59
and rock check dams in drainace areas which limit sediment getting into the
wetland.
60
V. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Comments Received from Federal. State. and Local Agencies
Comments were received from the following Federal, State and local agencies.
These comments have been taken into consideration in the planning of this project and the
preparation of this document.
U.S. Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers)
U.S. Department of Agriculture (Soil Conservation Service)
U.S. Department of the Interior (Fish and Wildlife Service)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Emergency Management Administration
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Administration
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources
N.C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Copies of the comments received are included in the Appendix (see pages A3-1
through A3-52).
B. Citizens Informational Worksho
The Division of Highways held an informal Citizens Informational Workshop for
the project on July 7, 1998. This workshop was held at the Brentwood Elementary School
in Fayetteville from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Representatives of the Project Development
and Environmental Analysis Branch, the Roadway Design Unit, Division 6 Division
Engineer, Division 6 Traffic Engineer, and Right of Way Branch of the NCDOT were
available to explain the project, answer questions, and receive comments. Approximately
18 citizens attended the meeting. Appendix 5 contains a copy of the news release
advertising the workshop (see page A5-1).
During the workshop, the Division of Highways displayed an aerial photograph of
the project area, vicinity maps, and a thoroughfare plan map showing the proposed project.
In addition, the Division of Highways supplied each participant with an information packet
containing general project information, a vicinity map, and a comment sheet. A copy of
this packet is included in Appendix 4 (see pages A4-1 through A4-10). Each participant
had the opportunity to review the aerial photograph and maps and ask questions or give
comments.
61
Two typical sections were presented to the public at the workshop; a five-lane curb
and gutter roadway and a four-lane divided roadway with raised grassed median. Two
alternatives for alignment were also presented. Alternative 1 proposed to widen Bingham
Drive from Fisher Road to Mary Kirk Drive to a multi-lane typical section. From Mary
Kirk Drive to US 401, Alternative I proposed to construct a multi-lane facility on new
location tying into the Bunce Road/US 401 intersection. Alternative 2 proposed to widen
Bingham Drive to a multi-lane facility from Fisher Road to US 401 along existing
alignment. Both alternatives shown included a combination of the two proposed typical
sections; a five-lane undivided curb and gutter section and a four-lane divided section with
a grassed median.
Comments received from those in attendance at the Citizens Informational
Workshop mostly pertained to potential impacts to individual properties along Bingham
Drive. Alternative 1 (the recommended alternative) was favored over Alternative 2 by the
majority of people at the meeting along with the local officials present. A few negative
comments concerning the project were received which questioned the need for the project
and recommended a three-lane typical section be constructed instead of a five-lane/four-
lane divided typical section, thereby reducing overall impacts to existing properties along
Bingham Drive. Overall the project was seen as a needed improvement not only for the
existing facility but also for the entire southwestern Fayetteville area.
C. Public Hearing
A public hearing will be held following circulation of this report to provide more
detailed information on the project to local citizens and to receive additional comments on
the project.
CMY\

62
IF'ffGUI1?InC,l
7 L,ndeu
rlt Of God n \ \
.,4nchesler
Sprin(R aker• 21w / 82 \ \
C+ M'?a 6'?, R_' L A N 3 7
?Fayettertli B7 `S
us
3 •s.
59 wr7? 24 3
1¢ertand. <1 3Va nder
'Y? -1, p 3tedV .00
A 0-1
1 - •1le? 00*
/ 1{o`Mil'S 3 \
Cedar Creek le s,\ \ \
/ IS Lena
zlo
81 A ,\
It
----- SR 1411 (BUNCE ROAD)
BEGIN PROJECT
401 1196 .04 .03 712
,4e9 U-3311 02 o4 o In,
\ .y $ I39 31`7 .1196 - r...
1?' ALTERNATIVE 2 9 91 h `, w? - - - ' 195
++\-_ r a I212 -? y (WIDEN EXISTING) z '" E 1z` 3,Z tog .m gn86
291 ; "_. t° - p , 324 1T
'ALILRNATIVE I 3 X13 1 3 ,.? I 92 $_1c g o 1t9o 1121 001 1?J m (II
119, .cw v •;, `?,
LOCATION) 12,10
ra k ?5,.-?50 ,e .1 e T-,
n9o °'.
33?9 n
3777 1 . 2916 . I C? 33.."\8 .. h I t e9 1 194
3<=2a 3 ?, _ m M\ .? a r .C of 1266 p .4 ^ /•.
731 +' ? 1377
„ ,3..< ? 3ti X57
m .m v ixs 13e9 Wr6\ 293e ?-g a d ''c E-?D' \< <1iea _ T?7 i2x? 17
3?71 X70 <'9_,5 t3 ', 33303?< I 1?5 ,.? J 3Y1 -x'4 t. 3033 1256 C I87 n ? 1
'. 33x0 ? ro to 03?`?`.r ?--Y- _-1 2939 ? 1211 ?rI
. M . 3"+59 1376 ' I_i"'9 1 3535 C' k C 3. _36 F 12616 - \
3376 r~ - 3340 \- c. a 1329 O • I Ore ?' :vb Y? ` ro? / 31 10 • 0 N .0]3
1327 T
3339 3049 , '
?r 13072 ?7rSu.a. ?bM' ?? 2 ^.3344 A
M r" ?? ? ? ?' 3313 ' o£ fr -l i'8 1141 /3037' - - ,(r o IPB. ? 262 _3003 ° ? ?\
° \ r 3314 ? 2935 % 3021 m3o76 ? 2s5Y\ ? ? ° 1x+1 m ??1250
_ 1265 N ? 126
O t l m • _ . +t; 02 N T g 2945 !'?' ' 1S
3013 X 3621 1 1329
3Sc 293. 2933 1341 7' 12f6 1 I M ' °- 3312 2935 1321 <,O.,?cp ' 0' A ? p 1 ?.a R . c" °y Orel y?
\ 1,06 293'2 c -M 1340 2 3 0 U' 1267 Q
3145 3'bb 30455 2965 \ 12]0 '
Oc n' ^'?? 1. \ b 3354 39`6 2932 5 135 ..? 3306 3 C14 \ n 2yt7 y.01 12`5 ^ 0_ O r I
8 14 7? .OI 23]5 L27 ^„
959 29rG n`47 n.. n33]3 3372 I 331-15
7 F 33'•9 c 31 ?•n . 16 3377 1-'o 1277
'/ - O Q?? 13]2 •? _ '. 01 °ry i "-1 a 3075 2< u? c 12_8'0 I
.3l a 33.1 ,C e / 333 C ?? S 23- ' 59
k O t2
1372 1271 1271
?8 F zm? '' _ - 3 _ 1 ?. I
2 7 _ •/ ++ -° zw?_ d' zz3
3398 3.07 ° ?-.3z
113c,5 _ 1zn a 121
,a zee c F ? F 1.3e9 z•3e1 ?1 ? 3,76 . X71--en i75a , °? vn,+' 1210 .ru; ? .C nom, ? 12x3 i
2959 I 33113310 3309 .ro 3_7529]2p On'? 3 10 3753 1377 127 1277 O
/: 37150 <",L"6 2Y.'4•? .09 fr, 33o7x C, n 3 G<'9)F. 3._3]S5? '? _ .OJ .O, .I 1216 .(t 1?3F
/ 251Z1 0292] I10. 3330 `3.. °t•[ o g. 2?OB rJ o ?' n'3713\ 1300 - m 1210rc 0i 272 1275 rill 194
4006 / 3322 r1; 3376 O 307 nN C. 03 O 1303 r - T1t3T ?('' N
2978 3A6 s 3331
3759 ' g c1" ?' •\ ? • ° 3338 • r05 338] 33m' 331M I • L5 .' :'m7 37112 . 13 3710'\ < 1331 1307 ;x11 O 30t2 ,
3i7BT .. ?• ^S O7 ' C o F765 339 . (.. p ` 1106 C2 . 1 3`.?B 1300' 06 ?" 1299 C I nr o t?
1 t o70 .0 3 ^O71 "v cK, _ 2'Y+
3321 ?? • ' 02975 u- 09 ^7 3F97
37e9
979 ,27 1 SI - ,?£ 1295?? c`?
3110 ;? I 1257 c o z9oz ?. 1 zw
-d 3 a 11u ?3 ?h. a-
2 4012 399
/ n " 1357 rn 1
C o 4l 4013 3573 x M K 3 V 2948 3 8 I w 12
3601 24
\ ? 3C? O ?. ? 9 \ 3788 1141 b tY - . M y,? / 13`6 -315 F . 3325 ? U, 3JBa . <o
3355 3706 =35 3G04 ' 'S 3349 3]99 x015 2 4014 3574 ?57'5' b, g I 1=9 2901 CR 0 . •?J .
3361 3307 rv /0 \ 3083 T 6 36n '? + ?, G • u 3323 1 n . f`6. ('rt
1107 3094 , .)0 3348 J; (}3 - •• _ m
SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE) 1>53
M 3350 33.04 30M 113.5 p 29P{'
? 3?° ??3347 18 334 C^ O S . r.1?1 < /.' 2930
33 7. n3 - 1 (Y -4 C 161143' 03 W J
33__'9. • w _T'K . M M nS r _ \ 3?97 .- y 12 - A37.' Ia a .n ?? ° 3715 .
t g 35_"9 R g O _ 3037 0 '.J S 10 Y/ ?11>6 22'9 1141
T59 .00 3352 3345 jv4 N -- OS 30f!6 ?584 ''-89/ -' - • ... 1 'a '? XIA
,6 •
t1 i0 334 7 W 0_
3574 ?!"9 3'+17 ?4 3C49 \ 3757 r '-'.'......
3S7S 'r15 X'99
3519 \ ••
3' 110 '\ 3758
O
0
11 3`__19 \ ' ? /
3sn . n .q •k ? cry
3576 N. ?• I
3618 1107
4 3751
3752
a 3749 END PROJECT
. o J U-3311
370 _ 3570 3773
37.8 C3 I
t 0., ,3]36 3714
2 3571 3 0 3779
I 3735 ?
?rQ. C2 I 7--'I
I

41F , r
• •

?'r '•7
i aTa?(, ii r y(q
4r ?. ,fit y r ?yN, ?/Y! G !" 4 \- ? I]r E kt -7. ? ? ? tR +?I J
. ,y,?
s'y¢t ?' -
t?>, Er ?
r
7?
?
(}
{,
?
?'

'
.•
?
,
?•
r I .
? P'a' .fE.
1
i.
..?!
j
R -'
?
44
%
•
?
• ? o" .. w .?
,.? ,1 . ? _
#
f r ? 4 Yr`? sA., ?,{?t , r ? ? i
'. r .?

ca .
! y'F^ .I ? .i .J f j '
''.
?
a+
`
4
} •
,
1 .'. yy
{ n d'' 4 j
1
q P{
,
r?,aF_
y?y(j,,R
yyyynn?,,
f'mT0. r{A. raT.Ir`c. .

y

offiftAk!
V,*
d I
N ,q
z
O W
rn H
>o
?Q
N O? O. Vt Obi
8 e o o v o
4
tm JE
ss
m
'
?

1
~
4 P
N
! F w a o 0 0

y
P N
O?
a ? m
e
e
R 1? 0 0

C
N
a
?
`. K a
w
LO ¢ '
o
0 I ? e
q° t l ?I I C
R ' I /1 1 I? PI h
t i wl ' '' 1
' I D .., P W •? a'
J l ..Z J w ?_ - ?,
I
x i i >»t < Q w/ 4 O 3 i
.a ?: UO =I =I o VI N,- Lij Q o? Q jZ, N
ru u i , •OC ?dZ( SZ L "t' « _ yam. ! _ 7 ?1 Cl)
LLJ
O LLI CC g O z sz a
r ?: u ru a x u °' ° P Z ?: w
Z) 6
U u u u O z i U H v o cn
N •.J Y 7 •• L z U S N Q h W M u C
,
0 LL
5 'o a V < AO M O O py?a •Qt ZL
zzO ? a W u {Z{II U= a
y F!. F y MH S ¢ 2 I° QO ?'
t K) 4 C U H^ O t O O
o• u " $au u r- z o H Y ?. U l.7
aZ a
_v o
x
U ul
cn
CL
07
H Z N
> 0'-
t
W Q z i WO,-izn
4 Z w
3 JJ' O?.OO

L
` a Cl)
Q
z
O W
- c
W C i'
9 Q
O K LL. "'' F-
O
f
w F
-
a
z w
Z? O Q .-)
m2j
0
Wm J

Ql
<
Q y
j
N < _
Q.--.,OWa W
o
= o
U) 2:
--?0
W
> O >
O LL ::)..
cr 2: C) -
.
Zo?n°C.uLu (n¢a
W O

1
?. \ II 1 • 7. / r® 1 `\ .?°OC. .b E11 fTT q?'1
?? of ? ?\ ??,IP,Yi ? ? ?-• ti? I, ;4• , I ? t 1 ' ? ? / 1 1 ? Q,
rY j , ? ^? y, ? ? ? I: 'r?1, 13 ?` ? ;I .r !I t p? ?`" I .,? I ?1 •-f, l ? ° : ' ? ?
?, • I 1 t o, a
l?' ` ?/'I 1 •I, - ' - ` moo' r t.
i ( !
10
>? ' ct It
s v v '' , ,r•
06
C) ,. 1 u*1. ft 3
LLJ
k / 1 II ( I o Ir O 11 ?.. , r ]ION
t t +?
i . + 1 1 1 r II Y 1 t °
r/. rFr ' ? ? ,? ) ? S z 1?"i7 II ,• t , i t U--ti? I ^? ? L???,
(-D 0
L-Li
j -'? • ' 1I • it DIN
?Y. "Y,> 1 ? ,' ? ? •i? III ? ?• II 1 ..? (. ?.l•1 t. 1 1 , ?- I 1::. i ' ?,
?tr _ ?•^w-? / r
s ? ,, t lit t ? ' ; ?d t o 1' 11'' ?/ ' [?7 •II 1+,??' II U
°
j??- . .1 I ? ? w
' 1 r ?I ? . r t , i ? ? ?, ; ? ' t -' T 1 I , •' '? _ ? ? ' n ? v.? F P
-f 1? 1 (,j J IS. r t 1 t1`- ;r? O oo Q?
r Yy 1 ? y t ,... _ 00,
0(
1 J ?y 1 e°`? II. ?' 1 0
' {{ \a z
tt '
I ?q 4A t i I?\ u ? ?: ----?
-Jf l 1 L
%
.01
?; •• L: --r=te 40 \ . `- `' . '
.11
I. 1 ?- ti]M\aC3M D11 P ; rte/ I
1 NI038
W
8082- x
ON dIl

(Oa N30Hv3) cool 8
•••• ............... 018z-n
ON dII

Oz9-n
.0N dIl
a r?
, I

- v08z-n
'°N dIl

MI 3 Hn t l1 us(
N
U
Z- p
X,,0- sn

II IOV)l
avid
S*O 0
S3?IW
t, aan61 j
Ilcc-n QHOdd dIl
A1Nn63 ONV-183oHn3
SSddA8 Sl3IH 3dOH 03SOdOUd 01
(OdOa 080j3Ca) lob sn Ho83
(3AI80 V4VH9N18) IVII US
3331A3113AV3
d3UV 3H1 NI S133f0ad dll 83H10
H3NV-dG SISAIVNV 1V1N3WN0MN3
(INV 1NMdOUAM 1:)3rOdd =
SIkVMHJIH AO NOISIAKI r
NOI1VI'dOdSNVb130 `
1N3WIWd3(3 VNIIOSVJ H1210N
, puaIaagw
('(}81., a3HSIj) L011 as
tt88-n
133f'Odd ON3
i
'a0 HV.HON18) tblt
f

ON3 Ib11 as
s08z-n
N dIl
lob sn\:,
( 6 tot, sn
iI88-n
103f0dd N1938
ON d'I'1
.

1
0
C
O
4-
U ?
O C ?/0?/
LL
L
O
L 70 m
U O
U '>
.a Q
T p
F- Q) O
1 C
0
J L
I N
W v C
_> cn
F-
Q v
NZ
rr
W
J
a
T
c
o 4-
0
U
O
+
?
Y
O
N

j N
o ?
?
C
N
t
a
O
CL
O
L
a
i E

v
ti
E N
n E
V
V
a? N
« E O
w ti ?
N ri I
O
co
w
« E F-

N r 0
.._..SD.L E E
? E
N n
? E
1 m m ? ?J
u?
« E
w
C

o
u
O
J
Y
O
3
c
c
m
0
CL
vQ)
U
N
O
Z
Q
<n
U
L
7
LL
z
z co
' Ln
o
0

LL
L
D

LL
i

C N
O D
C
U N
N >
cn a
U)
cn -0 O
O O O
L 3
U '>

p U
.U C L
Q ? U
T
F- U O
C -+-
i p
-p
N
p
n
L
. O
w
> rl?
I-- L
Q C)
Z

W co
F v

Q

I
r
c=)i
c
0
t
?.,
0 1.
U
O
J
Y
O
3
?
O o ?

N ? Q
o ? U
N
c
+'
a O
0 o Z
a

Sy:,n,j.
U (z' E) Ana
09 01
In-
(1S.LL'IcnCl) sjonj j ('v)= (0b)
lcad wd jo uic= wd/inc
a Jo uonwl(1= 4
('G) moU (cuoilJan(I= O
J(IV Jo (J,) se auinlOA ,Simoy tsagOn( 4t0E=
1
ON
OU 10 (IM ownloA AP1101 I u01saa= oe-1 AIICI
(Pd.+) iciv= 0000
<I-Ilos ON
-? N]y M
HMa
31VOS Ol lON
00oz
Alunoo pualaagwno
(LV L L LIS) 3AIH(7 MHONIG
L LEE-n
J? vu?ov1?iu??
\A" 'AS
9p0
00
S
O oY'
O?
0 002 k
o o
o ?
QZ\
a?
\4 QQO?? o??,
v
JQ a
?1 rZ? QI £L?£
C?- 01 Lb?? ?S o (3 -2
va d
u y?veunva?ls?_
Co 0 0( a -47 a bZ s
Q? WC,
0?-?-al lz?? ?j s °O=
wd 1??1 -jS QppE
oob?
Co(t) -JQ Ib,660Q-jw
Q?-4wd 01 IZos GIs
092-/
o
ao2? Lo11 ?JS
n
'id -Avg aAe7
o Q?goE -?S
O\
a 00?1
2
O o
D
0 02 ? \ ?.°°?2
ooz21
??< o I
n?
a On2\ OMB
Q QF--bI
o0 Z
da°? r DOSS 1
?\ L0011
o/
s?z
00?? ? s 0°\ p?
?o z 1
poi o 1
coo
OJ$S7 00 0 \ 010
\ o
•-J j," M LZ ? S'
o l C l-> 55
p8 ZAQ-l ka1'b9
DaZ? soli ?1s

0o?z L-Z?I Zls
ooo?
0000M 2n-oo a? ? ssao?u ? ?
vlnn/J ° x,51• ? °\p'?
0M
o Q_-7
P? a?uc?
llfil?s
ooo?o
000 5s
0
?l
U Ju uwi.?.uiU- '
( v,) n?oU Icuou»?i(1= (1
1(IV Ju (u) sC aumloA ,Amoy Is.)yJnl LpOE= on
OCA IC (TO --MIfIlOA ,(ImoN uSIs?O= OM Alld
(I)dA)1CIV= oo00
H9 IM19I1
Q?In?
N??1M
HMO
31VOS Ol lON
0000
J-Qt? (-)zoz
AIunoo puolaogwno
4t, L L NS) 3nIaa MHJNIs
L Lmn
i
.ss
O oc"
0
00
o? ? ? oo
Oi
Jaddad
2is oov-
? 0 C - Ql
0(1? C? OOZI
?_ 01 Lb?? ?S Q
Q? wd
,i
I
?oll? ?Q yboeuovavls
0?<- al -hOb? 215 0061
-
`^Ad QO OZ
CO CI
?Js Q0=
wA OaaL
jo
1-2g1 Js~ 00672
005
? o
09(0(1)
t-j of a Q'w
lzos GIs 000 1
00br
sn
w?
J? w'av?Sut?
o?oa ?
D
OoZG f7
OGV S
ao2?2 L011 ?1S
00 ZZ
0Z\
a
°?
oa0 o?
?
o
0 O0
O
hs
? ? o
°

l
O
o
o

i
?l

00
oob I
08
?` co 00°1
D8< o
rb
UO
Q00 O?b\
to °o?
ja -Avl a?e7
o()n ?S
00 lI Cap ?? p?
0\
01 ?>> SS
ya
Uo?? goll ?Js
Ol
CI (?)
01 d}'.SS
aAu ssajaul;A
?= LZ? I his
S?

o,
?
M
0
? o
o ?
00
o
S ? 1 Jr
0 01 z{7
00-70h OOb
o°l{,s
o° o0 QOLL e
Qpb2 Q00(2-5
0
000L
COW o• ?
acv
P Ilfil ? s
1
C) o 0
0
0 0
0
Opt ooz 10 00%z
0
o ?Ron?
t air
pp5Z l
n o 0?
J t?o
° ?`i'? Q n $ z I
00 oZ
00A-7-h I
oaZ ZZ
?w
0o b
0002 ? o°
092
o/IP
ti L \
8/1
?o
o?•c,

Mary Kii
('
Bingham Drive
(Existing)
2
15900
o a
O O
N ti
N
X5900

Olwu =ADT (vpd)
DI(V Fac =Design Hourly Volume (17o) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourly volume as ('7o) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (90)
=Direction of D
anvpm =am or pm Peak
(O.U) =(`o) Trucks (Dual.TTST)
pm
10 10 60
DHV (3.2) D
Trucks

O
a M
u
V)
U-3311
Bingham Drive (SR 1141)
Cumberland County
2020 A D-V
2000
NOT TO SCALE
07/17/98 DWH
FIGURE 6C
NO BUILD
M

G O ?( 10
Mary Kirk Drive
1200
1300
Bingham Drive
(New Location)
I 2 DOO D
I 13200
0
I V Op
0
Sr0 ?? ? ?$
\
D
?o
bOD
1+00
s
?D
0 E9 00
1 9 O

1760°04' O
1300 Righ+In'RigO?t $ a n
00 Ki
Kincross ONLY In v
Avenue In
CZ) ??
23+00
/500
Bingham Drive
(Existing)
8100
5000
BUILD
0000 =ADT (vpd)
DH\' Fac =Design Hourly Volume (90) at K30
K30 =30th highest hourly volume as (%) of ADT
D =Directional Flow (1o)
=Dimction of D
am/pm =am or pm Peak
(0.0) =(%) Trucks (Dual.TTST)
om
10 --' 60
DHV (3.2) D
Trucks
N
U-3311
Bingham Drive (SR 1141)
Cumberland County
2020 ADT
2oo0
NOT TO SCALE
07/17/98 DWH
FIGURE 6D
APPENIDffX ?
1 DTN ISION OF HIGHWAYS RELOCATION PRO RAMS
With the Relocation Assistance Pro,.-m, experienced NCDOT staff will be
available to assist displacees with information such as availability and prices of homes.
apartments, or businesses for sale or rent and financing or other housing programs. The
Relocation Moving Payments Program, in general, provides for payment of actual
moving expenses encountered in relocation. Where displacement will force an owner or
tenant to purchase or rent property of higher cost or to lose a favorable financing
arrangement (in cases of ownership), the Relocation Replacement Housing Payments or
Rent Supplement Program will compensate up to 522,500 to owners who are eligible and
qualify and up to S5 X50 to tenants who are eligible and qualify.
The relocation program for the proposed action will be conducted in accordance
with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property acquisition Policies
Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and the North Carolina Relocation Assistance Act (GS-
133-5 through 133-18). The program is designed to provide assistance to displaced
persons in relocating to a replacement site in which to live or do business. At least one
relocation officer is assigned to each highway project for this purpose.
The relocation officer will determine the needs of displaced families, individuals,
businesses, non-profit organizations, and farm operations for relocation assistance
advisory services without regard to race. color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
NCDOT will schedule its work to allow ample time, prior to displacement, for
negotiations and possession of replacement housing which meets decent, safe, and
sanitary standards. The displacces are given at least a 90-day written notice after
NCDOT purchases the property. Relocation of displaced persons will be of=d in areas
not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and comm.-,-,:,al facilities. Rent
and sale prices of replacement property will be within the financial means of the families
and individuals displaced and will be reasonably accessible to their places of
employment. The relocation officer will also assist owners of displaced businesses, non-
profit organizations, and farm operations in searching for and moving to replacement
property.
All tenant and owner residential occupants who may be displaced will receive an
explanation regarding ail avai;abic upt.vas, such as (1) purchase of rep:acer^.ent housing,
(2) rental of replacement housing, either private or public, or (3) moving existing owner-
occupant housing to another site (if possible). The relocation officer will also supply
information concerning other state or federal programs offering assistance to displaced
persons and will provide other advisory services as needed in order to minimize hardships
i to displaced persons in adjusting to a new location.
The Moving Expense Payments Program is designed to compensate the displaces
for the costs of moving personal property from homes, businesses, non-profit
organizations, and farm operations acquired for a highway project Under the
Replacement Program for Owrim, NCDOT will participate in reasonable incidental
purchase payments for replacement dwellings such as attorney's fees, surveys, appraisals,
and other closing costs and, if applicable, make a payment for any increased interest
extrnses for replacement dwellings. Reimbursement to owner- occupants for
replacement housing payments, increased interest payments, and incidental purchase
expenses may not excr_d $22,500 (combined total), except under the Last Resort
Housing provision.
Al-1
It is a policy of the state that no person will be displaced by the NCDOT's state o;
federally-assisted construction projects unless and until comparable renlacemeat housinc
has been offered or provided for each displaces within a reasonable period of time prior
to displacement. No relocation payment received will be considered as income for the
purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or for the purposes of determining
eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person for assistanc: under the Social
Sccurity Act or any other federal Iaw.
Last Resort Housing is a program used when comparable replacement housing is
not available, or when it is unavailable within the displace. s financial means. and the
replacement payment exceeds the federaUstate legal limitation. The purpose of the
program is to allow broad latitudes in methods of implementation by the state so
that decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing can be provided.
A]-2
RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
El E.I.S. 1:1 CORRIDOR EIDESIGN
JECT: 8.2442901 COUNTY I Cumberland Alternate 1 of 2 Altemate
I.D. NO.: U-0620 F.A. PROJECT I STP-1141 7
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: SR-1141 (Bingham Drive) From US-401 Business (Raeford Road) to the Proposed
Hope Mills Bypass.
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
I
Displacees Owners Tenants I Total Minorities 15-25M
0-15M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 2 1 3 1 1 I 2
Businesses 1 0 1 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms Owners Tenants For Salo For Rent
Non-Profit 0.20u I $0.150 1 0.20M $0.150 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 2040M 150-250 2040m 150.250 10
Yes No Explain all 'YES' answers. 40-70w 250.400 40.70M 250.400 25
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70.100w 400-600 70.100m 400.600 150
X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 up 2 600 UP 100 up 570 600 UP 200
displacement? TOTAL 2 1 570 385
X 3. Will business services stilt be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number)
project? Note: All Displacees Considered As Families
3. There will be ample business services available
4. Pantry Owner - Small - 4 - 6 Employees
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so, 6 and 14. MLS Service, Local Realtors, Newpapers, etc..
indicate size, type, estimated number of 8. As mandated by Law
employees, minorities, etc. 11. Cumberland County
' X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? 12. Or Built if necessary
6. Source for available housing (list).
X 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? 1,,,
{,
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? nt ? ep
X 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
t'ti3ti, e,
families?
'b
X 10. Will public housing be needed for project? as O LAA
X 11. Is public housing available? f
?:J
C
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing 7
' ' • ?F jt
housing available during relocation period? -" °?-??Yv? u" • •.. 'O
X 13. Will there be a problem of housing within - '
financial means?
X 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 12-15 Months
fr
H
L. odries
Al-3
RELOCATION REPORT
North Carolina Department of Transportation
AREA RELOCATION OFFICE
7x E.I.S. E CORRIDOR E] DESIGN
JJECT: 8.2442901 COUNTY I Cumberland Alternate 2 of 2 Alternate
I.D. NO.: U-0620 F.A. PROJECT STP-1141 7)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: SR-1141 (Bingham Drive) From US-401 Business (Raeford Road) to the Proposed
Hope Mills Bypass.
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES INCOME LEVEL
Type of
I
Displacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 15-25M
0-15M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2
Businesses 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms Owners Tenants For Sale For R ent
Non-Profit 0.20m $0-150 1 0-20m $ 0-i so 0
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 2040M 150.250 20-40M 150.250 10
Yes No Explain all 'YES' answers. 40.70M 250400 40-70M 250-400 25
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 70.100M 1 I 400.600 70-100M 700 400-600 150
X 2. Will schools or churches be affect by 100 up 600 up 100 up 600 up 200
displacement? TOTAL 1 1 700 385
X I 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS, (Respond by Number)
project? Note: All Displacees Considered As Families
3. No Business involved in this Alternate # 2 Alternate
6. MLS Service, Local Realtors, newspapers, etc.
X 4. Will any business be displaced? If so, 8. As mandated by Law
indicate size, type, estimated number of 11. Cumberland County
employees, minorities, etc. 12. Or Built if necessary
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
6. Source for available housing (list).
x 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
X B. Should Last Resort Housing be considered?
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
x 10. Will public housing be needed for project?
X 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
N/A N/A 14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source).
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? 8-12 Months
1?4 V1_11

Al-4
APPENDIX 2
TABLE Al
•
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1
JOB: U-3311: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive), Cumber[ RUN: SR 1141 (Bingham Dr), Year 2000, Build
SITE 8 METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) ' LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
• X1 Y1 X2 Y2 ' (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ '---------------------------------------- '------------------- -......................................
1. Far Lane Link 10.8 -805.0 10.8 805.0 • 1610. 360. AG 900. 17.8 .0 13.2
2. Near Lane Link .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 1610. 180. AG 900. 17.8 .0 13.2
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
COORDINATES COORDINATES (M)
RECEPTOR • X Y Z •
---------------------------------------------------------------•
1. R/W, 15.2m From CL • -9.8 .0 1.8 •
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND • CONCENTRATION
ANGLE • (PPM)
' (DEGR)• REC1
MAX 3.0
DEGR. ' 8
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.00 PPM AT 8 DEGREES FROM REC1 .
TABLE A2
CAL3GHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 2
JOB: U-3311: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive), Cumberl RUN: SR 1141 (Bingham Dr), Year 2020, Build
SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMS = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) ' LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
' X. Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ •---------------------------------------- '------•---------------------------------------------------
1. Far Lane Link * 10.8 -805.0 10.8 805.0 ` 1610. 360. Ad 1290. 14.8 .0 13.2
2. Near Lane Link • .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 ' 1610. 180. AG 1290. 14.8 .0 13.2
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
-----------------
' COORDINATES (M) •
RECEPTOR • X Y 2 •
------------------------- -------------------------------------
1. 1. R/W, 15.2m From CL ' -9.8 .0 1.8 •
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND • CONCENTRATION
ANGLE • (PPM)
(DEGR)' REC1
MAX • 3.2
DEGR. • 6
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 3.20 PPM AT 6 DEGREES FROM REC1
.
`'1 _'1
TABLE A3

CAL3GHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 3
JOB: U-3311: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive), Cu Berl RUN: SR 1141 (Bingham Or), Year 2000, No-Build
SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S 20 = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES
--------------
LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) •
' X1 Y1 X2 T2 '
------------------------'----------------------------------------•
1. For Lane Link ` 3.6 -805.0 3.6 805.0 •
2. Near Lane Link • .0 805.0 .0 -805.0
LENGTH BRG TYPE
(M) (DEG)
----------------
1610. 360. AG
1610. 180. AG
VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
(G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
---------------------------------
900. 31.6 .0 9.c
900. 31.6 .0 9.6
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
------------------
• COORDINATES (M) •
RECEPTOR X Y Z •
----•--------------------•-------------------------------------•
1. R/W, 9.1m From CL • -7.3 .0 1.8 •
MODEL RESULTS
-------------
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding tc
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND • CONCENTRATION
ANGLE • (PPM)
(DEGR)• REC1
MAX ' 4.4
DEGR. • 8
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 4.40 PPM AT 8 DEGREES FROM REC1 .

TABLE A4
CAL30HC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 4
JOB: U-3311: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive), CumberL RUN: SR 1141 (Bingham Dr), Year 2020, NO-BUiLd
SITE i METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES
-------------------------------
VS = .0 CM/S VD = .0 CM/S ZO = 108. CM
U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 1.8 PPM
LINK VARIABLES '
..............
LINK DESCRIPTION • LINK COORDINATES (M) • LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE
• X1 Y1 X2 Y2 • (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH)
------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. For Lane link • 3.6 -805.0 3.6 805.0 f 1610. 360. AG 1290. 34.6 .0 9.6
2. Near Lane Link • .0 805.0 .0 -805.0 • 1610. 180. AG 1290. 34.6 .0 9.6
RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
-- ......
• COORDINATES (M) •
RECEPTOR. • X Y Z '
-----------------------•-•-------------------------------------•
1. R/W, 9.1m From CL -7.3 .0 1.8 '
MODEL RESULTS
REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to
the maximum concentration, only the first
angle, of the angles with same maximum
concentrations, is indicated as maximum.
WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-360.
WIND • CONCENTRATION
ANGLE • (PPM)
(DEGR)• REC1
MAX ' 5.8
DEGR. • 9
THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 5.80 PPM AT 9 DEGREES FROM REC1
r

T.-%,B LE NIL
HE. RItiG: SOUNDS BOMBING US DAIL""
140 Shotgun blast, jet 30m away at takeoff PAIN
Motor test chamber HUMAN EAR P-AJN THRESHOLD

130 -
Firecrackers
120 Severe thunder, pneumatic jackhammer
Hockey crowd
Amplified rock music UNCOMFORTABLY LOUD

110 -
Textile loom
100 Subway train, elevated train. farm tractor
Power lawn mower, newspaper pass
Heavy city traffic, noisy factory LOUD

90-
D Diesel truck 65 kmph at 15m away t
E 80 Crowded restaurant, garbage disposal
C
I Average factory, vacuum cleaner f
Passenger car 80 kmph at 15m away MODERATELY LOUD

B 70 - `
E
L
60 Quiet typewrite !
Singing birds, window air-conditioner j
S Quiet automobile
Normal conversation, average office QUIET

50 -
Household refrigerator
Quiet office VERY QUIET

40 -
Average home
30 Dripping faucet
Whisper at 1.5m away
20 Light rainfall, rustle of leaves
AVERAGE PERSONS THRESHOLD OF HEARING
Whisper JUST AUDIBLE

10
0 THRESHOLD FOR ACUTE HEARING
Sources: World Book, Rand McNally Atlas of the Human Body, Encyclopedia
.kmenca, "Industrial Noise and Heanng Conversation" by J. B. Olishifski
and E. R. Harford (Researched by Ni. Jane Hunt and published in the
Chicago Tribune in an illustrated graptuc by Tom Heinz.)
TABLE N_
NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA
CRITERIA FOR EACH FHWA ACTIVITY CATEGORY
HOURLY A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL - DECIBELS (dBA)
Activity
Cateeorv (h) Descri lion of Activirv Cate¢orv
A 57 Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance
(Exterior) and serve an important public need and where the preservation of
those ualities are essential if the area is to continue to serve its
intended purpose.
B I 67 Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas.
(Exterior) parks, residences, motels, hotels. schools, churches, libraries. and

I hospitals.
C 72 Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories
(Exterior) A or B above.
D - Undeveloped lands.
E 52 Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools,
(Interior) churches, libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums.
Source: Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 772, U. S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Highway Administration.
CRITERIA FOR SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE
HOURLY A-WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL - DECIBELS (dBA)
Existing Noise Level Increase in dBA from Existing Noise
in Leo(h) Levels to Future Noise Levels
< SO >= 15
>= 50 >= 10
Source North Carolina Department of Transportation Noise Abatement Police.
A_--h

J

z
c
-1
rn
fi
y
0
0
co
N
t
23
y
e
N
n
n
7
0
n
co
co
v
0
a
m
i

_ A
A A A _
k
© p Q i
s

1
y m y a

o.
v C

n ?
A p
N N 1
V
0
'1 w
1
Ir
O O

N s -

0 0

z

i

v d d
m
? I ? I ? I n

r
r
A

r
a
u+
O
? Q

? r7
.
.3 O

n

c h ?

I ? r z

I

? r

r

W

m
N
A
O
z
r z
w < O
.., o e? >r- m

cn j
LL,
I
I

IOl

1 j
aIC R

i Y I
'N1=00 r- loo V Ia 1\;, Q'

r r+,iN?? O x1001010 r
r \: V1 V1 V'l r l: IZ o ?IV1'V1jV1 i Vl jVl V'1 V') V') Qlvi;v?iv? %n W1
I

W
?
I I
I i i• I• +•
' ? !
1 i
? I I I !
? ? ? I !
( I I I ? ! I I i I ! 1 i
LI
I I I I
? 1
I
LL1
rA '
I a I I
N if+1 a I I I I
! of 'L (-4 ia I001a i
I
V^ Ia-1oc ' ? I I;
i I
V, IrI^ iV N `1^
^ Q
??„ R i
? s la OOIr i`j ?' i00 i
? V, R'Y ?Y'? I V' I t 100
? ? R 001
? V, V:
h M N !,o Ir ?r Ir I? !
R!Y R IY
V1 V'1 jR' ? ? ? ? ?
'
i

/?"
I
I I I
M 0 ( I I I i I i
I I I I
? ? ? ?O 00 n I
n O a N O r? O O v1 N V, I r C O
I a M O I
G W J o? •: ••
V1 N • ,
W) V, r I c•
v,
R •-:
h o:
Y oo
Y .o
R I
Y r r c? 0
Y I V'f V,
Y I Y 00 06
Y I Y r
Y I
; I ; ,

? I I ( ? I
l
'
? I I
? II
I 'i
I
1 I I
O ? .? I
.?I-?I ?I..al.r ?Ia CI W: al a:i?lr=1CICI?, c? C ?,rZ ?IJ ?,..rl.?
U ?
< O CIO I o Ci C:?j ?jol ol o 0 0 o
ojolo 0 0 0 0 o C o c; I o
A f.1 N Pi 1 C
' f? r? O
I V1 r` 00 -n l
Q V'f w'1 O N
a
Ihi? %n R
00 m
O r?
r O
?O ?O
v, O I h
Y m
00
G Q Q N I Y I 1I V,
H a N
h 'O 00 -
N R
N OI
N ?
.... I N

' C y
(/? r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

p
U rn

I
Z ? R ;= = ;= Is I I I i = I= (_ = I= is I= I_ = I= is :_ '= I=
= I`
- Z O
? i
r
J 6)
> L.
a
Z
I ? I I ?
I I I I i I I j I I
i I
C
Q
?
i<
I
I I I I
I I I I I
W i
I
I
I i O
I 1
I
I
I I

`

O

l O

O 00

V, t^
N
N V,
?
w
v,
Y
N

?
I
N

O N

V, a

Y
V1 I
r-
Q
V,

R
M5 V1
I
QIR

V, w
RIv, -r *'r

V1 v,
h
RIRIY'RIR
(j QI
1
RIT ? ?O ?O D ? I
IR
Z W1

I
z 3 = ° I

•i
7
7
I

I
!
y
I 1 z

<
< rn ?
rn
^ I I !
I I I
I
Cfl
I I
I
1
? ? I ? I
i
I ,
O I I I
a
I
a ` U U U C1 m m D m m D W m D m m co D m D m g D m D
D D

< W OG
I I
? ? I

O <
V ?
Y I I I I
_
I I

V
I ..

I V V I

I V I ?

u I u I V I u

u I

V I u

u

Z
W h
.n
u
N vs
V/ u l u V
V
?n _
I V I
I
U
?
U U
C I
I
?
U
(
j
V
I , i V 1 v I u
?
'
:
'
u
1 V
v ?' v I `:
U I
U U
u
I ?_ v, l
' U
V U'
'
T
:r l U
? V T
=
J
J
-? = ?
C
?i
0 ! r r N N
- :I?ICIC.IU1u
I V vi
IvIu Vf
u of vI I w N Vf N . y N u
ul4
ulululului ul
v ci I v u I .y
lullly
.- Z Lt ID C'E <'< C C
C CIC U C l
l
IC,: E C _ CI C CIDiC Di'C
-I' x I c, r oc - N ^ -r
.? .. . . . . - . fem. i N n! N N

I
- a
G i I ? ?, I I I ? ! i ? I
I ,
!
qT
3 ..
C ?
O O
•. j
0 0
? .y
O .:
= u
N
u u
N >
0
>. W
? O
C ?
e3 u
° u
o r
U r
o U.
N N
N `
T
r
d a
7 .?
C ?C
G cc
H rr
u
u

a-
•
I-,?
A
J
LL)
Z j Z
? a
w ?
W
N

I I ' i I
?,o'?c v,iN?oi3 3 !3 I
I I
3
I ?
I
3
C I 1 ?i i I
jag : a

I i I 00 ? I
al
v1 ? I I
', II
I I
I I I

^
l'rl Z I I
? ? '
? i i
I I i
i
I I
I
1 W
0 I I ! ? i i? i• i i i
a W ?
?
I
a ?
I I 1 I I I
I I
I ' I
I
l I t i ..
I
l i ! I
1
-3 Ia,.j .a
..1 i.1 -3 ?,..a ..? alix la a? t
' ..j -j
I..3 .a, .a l a

?
U :r
t
o
o c!o
oj
clo i
o lc c
0
0'?
o
o q
o 'o
of ,,; o
%n ol=
c;lo
mil o
?o
^
.J '? .3 F
fn I C O ?O e+1 t
e?1 of h ' of V? N I N 00 l
614 00 % N I m I i v1 N N
C7, C7, ^

z L:? y W U I I I ! I I I ! j I
F

Q
i
t _
=
I= =
i= I
= I= i= ,a?,?
_ ?_ != I= I=
i

I I
_ I - I . i t I ! ? ? ? I j I I?C I I i I
r Q

Q ?
I I
I ; - l i °
i ? I

-,
O
W
N ..
I I

I O

?
a, O
I
00 N V1
_
_

r"
L., r" O v1 h I of v1 v1 v1 vt v1 I v1
v1 v1 v1 I In O at r 1-
11
v
?p
?p
I ?D
p (y ? ? ? et < I < < ? e
Q ? < C-4 10 v1 ?p v1 I 1 4
. I
_ .? :0 i = 1

? u
i
?. a I I ' I I i II

c
z
3 ?
=
c I I I ? 7 I
uj
a ! I N I -
O o l I I I ;s
' j
Z a I I c

I I I !
.?
l
Z ? m m = m m m m m I©IW m W m w U m m m W U Lb W C2 m in
0 ? ? I i a l I

? ? ? j ' I I ? I I^_ I I I !
p
G V p
Q u

I u i u l u u

I Y
I Y
u u u

I u

I u u
. I l u
N I I
u
U u I T
V t/1 I v Y
?
I. I C
I u I u u
..
Z ? fn
? U
C I C
u V
C I
v
v C ?
v
u v ? N
v C
' u C'?
V ,
„
?
? ' ? i
u
'?

?' u
7 v u
7 7 7 l Y?
:C ' 7
7 u
7 1? v
:v
I ;C
7 7 ?
r
72
;C _ ;,
, ?
' „
, .
.
i, •• •••

a

p

C
^
I N

Y
N i N
N

Y
I V V
H I A I N

I V
V' V _

I V I N
N
V J Y

N

Y

N' N

V Y

. 1

N of

V I

h

V

Y N
N C = I=
V' V a IA

of N
N
l V U V
` IW . I
a,ala aIC a lwla x U lm,= a czIc Ic,I©iC!a la,c,o
UJ 111 t `: . ^ 00 p. I O I . l f-4 I r K I N ' I= : t- i OC
I l a I O I N . OC ^ I ? N
"
'^
' r^. I , r , .t
K
T
U I N N ?! N N? r. ? r+: r: ? r r I"1 i f?1 i P?1 P?1 I K Q I I r
1 1
. T K
(? ?
L:. =
X

x
V1 Q
r x
3
7
c
o
c
r r.
N
O N
'J .
N ?
•o
N N
•? V
R S?
r
o
f
G '=
:J -

J
yL
J]
zw
Ca
?C/)
?z
L:r
N
C"

1 '?1 ...1 ..^? 1 . ?'1 .1. 1 1 '?'•? ?1 '?'1 v ..^. ?.'? . 'r1 1 . 1 'v 1 . .^.

C L) y
_ _. - _ - _ _ - - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ -
Z Z I

? ' I
'' ?
Iv alalooiaia
IQ IZ;No I I ? I ! I, j
I I
oo'ola a o a a aia?
%Oil-lw!1.0INI%Q z ,I,z i I
I I
ala'a a --jala
'ol`'.o??o I
I
x ala

a

! I I I

?
I I
I
? I I
i I
I I i ? I,

? I I I I i I I
_
D ? I I
I
G. I I
I I ? i I
I
'
I I I I I I! ? I I ? I I

? ;. o;o olo c 0 ? ct?lclolo'ol c 0 01=10 olc. o o Ic o
F"
?
d rZIa %Q oo d
I •r vi r, II oo r vi ID f- v1 I v1 r- o I W% v; o 0o ae
I
I
I o0
3 l
V1
N N I N N !V r4 N N I (.4 I PV I fV N !V fV N N I N N C I !V f+1
N
N
N N

E., a U v I I I ? I I ' I ?( I ? I
I I
H N 1 I I I ?
i i I
? I ! I
i s !z x in in
Z O
I
a Z I I I I I ? I ? I ! I
=
I ? ,
I

I
ti.?
? N Lid C
T O?
Q
I

I I

f
' I i

I
I
I

O cil W
: V
O
I O
?o O?I?IOiO
D` O
0
v I ?o I ?o v ?o 'o ?o 0
?o ?c 0
?o 0
?o 0
I ?o 0
?o 0 0
I 0
•c O? O
OIO
N
O O
?o I I ?o vt I ?o ?a
- I
x ? I I I I I I
!
I
I I
Y C I I ' I I I ? I I
IV^ i I I I I ' ' ! I ; I
?
I
W SG O
a a ? ? I I ? i
Z
t.1 v] I I

Z d mlm m n m m m m n nn m m m m m cctm m mlm m m n m in
O o u !
i
a I I
F F ? i I i j
'

O
u
e
I
I
l I
i I I
?
I 1
I

?-

V
u
u
N u! u
c?
u
u
t
?
V ?I c°^jl ?I ?
l -
u u
u
uI ^I =
v u
?
?

I
V I N V
?' ?
?
V u
I ?
u
I
? v1 ? -iI u' ?I v u v
ut v ?? v u . v ? v v
' v v u u e?i u,,c
?
- I ?!'? •?
M
N
• 7
N :C:2 7
•N N
N in
N 7
N I7 7 7
N •&A N D
•0 7 7
•CA N 7
•0 7 7
2
N I N N
M ..

•N VI

I •N

Z V/ Vl
N
O I
V
V V
I
u.?v;ta CI?? V
I? !
I
V V U V V
IcG?C?CI?IC V
a V V V
clc?loc V
a V V
?I? V
a V :! V I V
?I?:c x :J I V
ic,rt V
l?
` < cc
I r4
lr
I
! I ? I f-I Icc
I
' I
I
K
K T ??
IY.
?;v1
Iv''
.Iv1
v,
jv1lv'Y
I
I`.
?:
i\:
\: ?: ?:.
'v7
i?
r-

M
M
C
O
O
"O
e?
U
IRT
0
h `
T ?
3 ..
` •o
B?
3
0
o
N u
C N
O ?
?o
., y
oN
L)
C h
? •C
? C
? o
m OD
C u
o to
• u
^ N
Q r-
u L
a
ts.
LU
o u
vl N
T
3
Q G
E.
0 R
V) u
C C

jL

?
? 1 1 1

LI
W
C J T T T w + T T i
T
rt
``
r _?

7 'I

:.•..J
I
?O? Ir ICD
B'.
-

? I I
I

IC\ CT I.^? 100!r Ir V' iv'1Iv'1'?

B.,
v^ ?`; v7't? .7 ISO ?D
?J
BC 1

'OI

t
r t? It- Its
C ,
Ir ;r
IIZ r
NC ? ;
I
I i

W
Y(
a
• I I • • 1•
I I ;
I
s
? • I• i• Iw ?• jw i• Is I
;
w w s Is w s
;
I ;
W
.? ???-----
---
'

I I !

!
I I
UP)
? ? (

P?
0
?
I I ;
ICI
I I t i
I
I ?
I I
? C
? I
I I 1
l i 1 ?
1 ?
1 I
? I
I 1
1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I
1
1
1 1
I I 1
C.. ? ... I I ? j
i
I
i
rA
i ? t
I? I I I I 'I I 1
I I ? o0
?' . I
, I I I I I I I
I
C I I I I I I 10 0
o
v1 V 00 ° 00 0 0 0 0 oio o olo 0 0 0 i C'
o 0
0
0
o
io
;
clo
;
o
O 3 N N I c wi .W e ? l
v l
?c ?o r- o v; e•i r4 c?
N rn
m o
qT N
mr <
--tr m
!V •a
N a I ?
N N v
I
N N =
^ _
G
'C N N N ^ I
..n
!V N N N m
I m 1 I •?
G
X ? I I O r

1
N N = I
I I I i I ( I I 3
O U w `' I "'

= I

f
i

i I
I
i i i i 1 i I L 1 S I

i I t I

t I i I i

f

L t i L I f I I L o

?•' N
F?1 ^ fr p " 1 =
T I
I
I
I I I I Q JA
u
U

> a Z A i
Iv

I
I
I

I j i ,
„ >
^.. . I ?
i

r •? _I ? ? ? i I I ? i l l i
? ??
L E °° °' o
fz W -? E `''
I
I I
E.y 7 N? O 00 cn N %C N N N N O ^+ a O O? O?
I 00
I en
No ?
,
UD
'O M
UD
?O
ID
Z+
, IC No ?O so ?D %a %0 -O %O 'D ?O v?
h n I
I I C
'
x
W •C I I ? i I
I
I c u
o '?
7- O I Cd
u I I I I
I I
3
3
i
i
i
i l
: I
i li i L li i
f f
: f f
=
=
i=
? N
^? ^ i C ^ f i i
I I I
I l
i
I
.,
' I
- _ oc L a I I i t I j s?
c, t?
C.oo
W p
z
a
Q
1
I
I
I
I
I
I l
v
W v? 3 a
e
0

?
O
?
to
U o
•-•
W
i?
to
CO
W
m
?
R]
m
C]
CO
m
m
m
cc
C]
U
R1
to
©
G7
? I C1 U
?

F V c u
I y `'
+
Q F I = 1 ?
3

O V Q ul =? u u? uu u u u ul u u u {? u {? ul u ul v u u. u
V U N ^
V C
I U
J V
I o ?.
W I ,
-
^ -
fA V to V U U U V
C C C C I- C C C v I rJ ?, u, u v u
C ?+ d' - C
u u
Irn
u v u
l v
u ^
v u u u v u v v v
7
7
7 '7 -01-0 •7 'C 'C C 'C 7
-
J
'
I
'
'
1
,
M
z
fl
;
O
7
/A •N N VII N h I •N N •N •N I •N VI •V! ? 1 h N N N N N
I N
' ? •^
p N N
N ?
ul u u u
Q
u .. u u V V V ul u u V; vI V ul u ul u u u u
C'CIC
-
'
I
I
I _
Z 1
I? r.: C CI
a CLIC?GtiId CtClx C,C:CIrz
©;ti ? ?
C
?
r
I a r.
V I
N r1'K V'
I ? I?iN1r-i I?'?1V1 ??:. III 1001sT C
Y 1 ` `
-. I N ? 1 ' ? . ? ?? ? ? . ' x
I
I V
' . vi u
.)
J _
Ire
l
} r
Y• I
? n r -T K 1/'1 -

W
C-4
(z
W
0-4
zz
r?

M
M
?LL
C?
O
U
'•O
R
V
y
U
D
CD
c

r r r r r r r r r r r` r r` r r r r r

i
'
Z ?. z t
I
I I ?
i ? ? it
I ' I i •. ?
• I i I ?
rlOi31T ?CNIa ^
T a, Ic.ICVN C7, 0, Ic 1010, 01
?'G,
' C, CIO
-
- O
- 'er x N
I
'
%C Iz, I v' I ?O V' 110 'O J z 1 Im r Iz V 'J I
V r "O f
f [ Vc
.Q
L7 i I

?" X
cc ?I
I
I

I
G ? 1 1 ? I I ? I I ? I

? I
I
1
N ? i I
I I
I
O 1 11
1? i i 1 1 I j 1
I 11 I I 1 1 1 1
I 1 1' 1 1 I I 1 1
I I i 1 ?
1
,
z ' t
I I I i 1
? ' Ii ?? I I I I I I l
1 j
1
i

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ? 1 ? r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ?
a ? I 1 I
? I I I j
U W. cd I W G: w w W I ce c. W 0.'I ly. w. .j .a -1 ..a -1 .j ..a -1 -3 ..a I C I c+ Q.
?
?
F' ,0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OIL o
;
3 v - v r t -- 1 0
e- a e- 'o r r r-- r- on r- wi % ; I r; ? 0
en
V ^? r1 w
'n
f'1 N N I l
N C-4 (V C-4 N PV C4 !V PI N I N N N N N N N C4 1
l
Q O u I I I ,
I
1 I i

I
•y I I
l I I
I I
W O ,.a [ i i i i [ i [ i i i I t i
t t [ l i I¦ _ _
I
I
l i I I ;I
I
a
i
, t
I I I
w g I I

O ! _I PI'1 N N N r1
I I N
I N N N
I N N r1 r1
N r1 r1
?C I ?D I ?D
N r1
?D N
?O r1
?D r1
?O r1
?o V1 N
?D 0
i `C
h
CU NO
?D ?D
I ?O ?C ?D .O %0 D D t
z ..a II
? • I! I I ? II ? I
? ?
° I I I l
?< ? I I I i i
U2 z
uj
?
e
.,

•
a Q - r i I i i 1[ t i [ t i i [ _ [ i l i t [ ! [ [ l i i ! l i i

z
c y
Lu
3
I
I
s I '
C
Z
a
'
m
Q]
0
R
C]
G7
Ra
f?
G]
C]
co
G]
m
m
R1
C]
m
07
LSD
Q!
Q
CC
0]
©
©
C]
?
F" C((Q777 ?
_
< l ? I 1

U 1
ul u, ul u? u

? .
u? u
?
I ul u u
Vu! ul -u
u
u
C
u
u
C
ul u
C
u u u u u
? ? I V j V :J I V Y :J
C j 7 7' 7 7: 7 V I V
17 7 V
7 V V V
'C 17 1 7 _
I V ? T I V
I •? .. -J :J
7 ? V
77 V
7 V
7 V
' L :J
'O 7 _v, u' :J ?J ?'J?
Q D 01u1v u1u u luiu lu ?Iulu lulu r v u u u ulu lululu!u v
•- Z LL a a _Ia a lala la alala la a!a cz ce a a ls`Ia IaICI_:c,?
`
Y. I N 11•.- -rite-) = I r- x '- I - •-•
1 ^ ^
?!r 90;1 _ Ir'111+1 '7 v1'\. r
'
u r r r Ir Ir Ir r Ir ?r Ir 100 00 00100100 IOC
? v: i?: \: Ir
C G I I I
1 I
00
wi
L4 1.
G 0
.. a
v c
o
O
` r
V
r
f
Y

1=
R
N
Cr
U r
u
u 0.
U-
L)
M
N N
N `
T
-Z u
o c.
N
c °c
c ee
p C
.1 I
J
l
r? ; N
Z _? ?

2
Ltl < I I • w ,I
LU
, x x . V-, , v,- v^. v^. r x r- -r r` x r, v-, v. x x x x
r y- ? + ? ? ? y t T ?. T T T
i

I rlrlr?o??oo?ooloo?r'r .o r,iool?
'

• i•
??
•
?
•
• I I
w iw Iw w iw Iw Iw iw
+ I I t
• I• Iw
;+ •
i
i 1 I I
I
I II I

r C? ? ? I
I

I
? a j( ? ? ? I ' I
I I i t I

? O U I i I
l
C? V >? a ?o ?o ?o a ei < ?o ?; v l e ?o o ?o 100 Go 00 I V I '°
C7

F
o c o
00I
00I
00
O?
N
00

-?

N
-^?

I

r
C7,
I r
I Go 00

00 . .
I -•

.
V? ,

.
O ?• C.

' Q N N N fn f-1 M I f+
7 N N M
N
N
I M P"1
I
.I
'T N
c N N
eo I
j ;

zW a? a ? 3 ? I I I? I
o ?, I I
W -
z
I
I
...w
Q Q s = : a = Iss s Ic s s = ' c s s z
s c
s
I I a l = '

J> a. z I I
i I i_ I I ? ? i I I I
r
0 _

? 00

a
f-1
N N

i

C s s Is
i
?x 3 13 I i i t i
I
O ,o I I I I
c
_ z
a
=
u
m,m-'

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

mlm

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

c)

n

m

m

nlm
0 O ? ? I
I

? ?

l I
I
I I
O U I vi u v l YI u u
u
l u uj ul
u. u Y _ I u u ) I ui ul u u u
Z
to
? h ,-
j' G! N
?V -
I !1 - c
u u _
c c c
u u u Y
u v l u v V
I u
u
V
V
^^ j y ?; u
. •
N N N N N I N
l N N N I H I •^ H '? '? 'n
I
C N N
nlri ul? N
u
I N N
u?Y
I y N N
ulu ulu
I u!uiulu?u lu u u lv u ^u u,vla+
C
L ?I? _I:i. ? aIa w w =:a .W. _,? C'C CG !a a '= I_'
C
? it x' a -"N N1 ? --
Ny V1 IYl ?v? ? ? '
?: I
V11V`?
Vl'V'
?!•
??
U .'? :J` ? ? ?'.? ,
I
?
.
.
I? T ??
I ? ? I
I
?o
H ?
!Q ?
3 'O
c .o
? C
H Y
C y
016
C
? O
U N
N
C
? O
? 00
O ?
a
v l7
u ?
>r
=a
e
V1 P1
N
A
C U
o c.
a •c
N ca
"J
r
J
:L
cn
O
zw
r°z
/U
M
M
G
0
e?
L
V
r7
. yy
i?
V^. In V•• V1 V1 v-, V1 1/'1 V'1 v1 v'1 V^, V^• V1 x OC x X.' Oc ."? x .'? "f
W

Z r z I I I ! I
i I
•IT V' 00 ? ?(? f? Ie? fqC !? jr Ir N Ifs ?f? I^. ?? p I.-.I ?. .? ?-IN
IN IOC V?
I I
i • i I•
t I i i
i • • • i • i • i
i l i • i i i
i i • •
i
l
I

I I I I i I
W I I I I I
I

I
I I ?
Q 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1

°
I

w 1?1
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1
a I
? I ?
I I
I I ? I I I I
-
, = a aia al a aI a a al a ai aj a aI ?I .?I .? ?I ? .?I ?I ? a ? a a
_
v _
° of et er R Q < I .. <
3 F r T oo O? N .- N O? N I ?+ N N N N 0% Go 0; ? 00 O r? 416 r-:
?

? N
m N
f+1
e+1
f+1
N
m
m
m
ell
e+1
M
-
N
N ?
1
..
° ? ? ! I
F
a ? I i I I
IA I I ?
Lt]
N ? I I ? ?
(? y e s s s I s s s s Is Is I s Is Is Is Is Is s I s s s s s s s s s
z O
R
I
C

I
I
(
I I
I
I

I
I I
I
?

'

I I
z Lr] J N I ? I I I I I i
I
i
N_
O
J a
cn K _ en ?O N N N e+? N N N N N N e? en N en e+'f t+? I N I en en I e'1 r N
tt
z a
I
° I I I

? ° - ? i I !? I
z3

I
Z X ° IN I I I I I I I ' ) ' I

? i i
, I I
o I '
z a '= m m m m m Im m m m m m m m m m m m m m m o m m m m m
0 ? I
? I I I I I i
L <
l
0 U ?I ? I ul u l u v u u ? u c?
u
° c? `? u
u $ u u u
u u °I °uI 8

z
N
cnl v?
c! u
I c u
c
l^ u
c u
c ,
_
c ^I
u V U

u
c c
u u
c
u

u __
c
u U u __ ?_
I I cl
u u eJ V
u V V u :! L V
7 I V
7 V
7 V
7 V
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ' - 7 7
I

Q N
?I u N N
ul u N
l u N
l u N
I u N
?
u N
u •N
u N
l u . N
u N N I •N
l uI u u
i N
u N N
u? u
I N
u N
u N
M I N
? u ul u N I N I N! N
ul u. u u
'
U.:C C:C IC t= IC I= - a' C w C,
i1:la Y CIx IY C ILL:C C CiX
:C15
L'
U ..i h'V Ie-
` j ?: INO a,
I v^ I I•••
I r t? N
t? Ie^l '`TI 1/1IV Ie? I00
l t? r` I t? l r? i t r` IO
I t? I'? I'^
l 00 oP IN
I oo Ie+1I ??'? \:In x L1
l oo i ac oc co i x x i oc 1,
L. a , I I I I
C C
0
a,
3
o°
Ir •V
g •c
V K
N V
C N
O cc
c N
N
U y
° y
u • IIoAA
7 C
7 C
5 m
°- c
? c
^ N
u ?
a?i a
•= U
e+•1
N fy
1/1 v
? u
a
"o u
o c.
u V
N VI
oc
a R
N N
u u
C O
J V
AI-1-1

x
I
r. ?' `• ? 70 OC ? V'1 V1 V1 % ' V'1 =? =? i %
v, W, v x c• v v, v
Y ?1 V'1 X
E
- - T - - 1 t
w 1 + T I I
I '
i I i

I N I ` C4 I i
I
?. ?.
o
r,4 00 o I '
I

oc 00
f4
V' r .O I N I '? x oe 100
? i
i v
, I •
I
? I j ? I s • la
• •
1 I I I I I
I
? .? 1 i I I
! I I
I I
uj r ? I I I i ? I
I I I ? I
l
W I I I I i ? I I ?
1
' 1 I
z ?' I
I ? I
I
1 I I I ? ? ? I I
I I I I I
M I ?
?., w I I I

G a I I I
F.. 1 I I II ?
1 ' I
W l
cx C ? al--I.Jj
ceaa
?o ? v a I ? I ?o ?o e ? <
I
`
, I .o ?o, q ? ?
V1 O 00 ?O N V1 f? 100 l? C? O? O
^ N N r'+
? G I O
I
•• Q E"' O ?/'f I V ?D en •
O? I O? O r O
a{ i l i
N N N N N fV N f." Q f'1 r

?
I I I

I Is is
1

a Z
a rn ? ? J ?
I I 1 I
l
31
I
I
I
I
I I
Q Q + N I N I I I I I
,
I?.r (a W ..
V] O:
W ? ?+
r+ en e?
N
I
?O N ?O N
N r tf O O? O? I ao en
N N O I V? r Y1 ?O
O I ?D ?O r+ e'+ r'^
?O ?O ?
.i v7 ?D ?O
m ? .yi ? ?O ? ?O ?O . ? ?O ?O ?D ?O ?D ?O ?G ? ?
I
..? ? Z ..? = I ?
I I
I I I ?
•- a •V ? •C ? 1
?.
f" (.? d . 0 r I O? I I L?J ? I
I
F p a ... I
• =
• I I I
W
Q O V] I C
? ? I I II
,
I
X
Z m `? 3 1 3

- I
I

Z C
m u m m 'r C1 m cm g
'?
m m m m
m m U CO cc m m
m cm m m m m
O ? qU
O I ?
' I
I I I
d I I I I
I I
?
? ?
I 1
I
1
1
l
?
l i I
I
I
? ?
??
I
8 ?I;
l
o ? IC
?
l ?i
8
u_I?
? t3
l 8 t3 ?I^?
?I?
N
?3
?i
?
'
u
u", tn'
v.
v
'
? _
? ?
ulu
lu?a
I:?;u?
_u _
' u
' iuu ±.?17t"
.1?'
vU u u
0.
'7 7 7 :R •fl

a '
^' _
,
.,
„ 17 7 9
? i
l
l '?
V7 NI•VII NI ?I N I.? vt ut
?l? "
a a c?r
C) a a
cx
I C
IC cY C' ;ala,
a
Z
G? d 12,C, :i C
- r x!cIC C _ N r.
-rlv x ^
-`Nir,
1 V'
•
'
V ...7 I T K ' I K =r ? : ? ? v'. i
l
• V
1
,
h I r I V1 V1 V
a
1 C C I I
z
ag
rv
3 ?O
o •o
c c
M V
;J J
r i
? R
:J r
J
v L
u ?
O Ci
r+
V1 1..
r
C G
C 'O
c ?
%,-I
:J
r.C
cn x x
x
. V', V'.
V^. V' k

LLI
' ?
I
I 1 I I
?I I

?
I
j I I

I I
.
I

I

?I ? I x tI?-
I
I I
I i

I x
x 3
l3 ' ' ? ILC -?ol'-
N
?
? °I°I[?I°
I°
?? I .?l,?c'?
x
f31r,r;?I?
x
loo I
:
i I
I.ol

I
_ r
M p
I? I I
I
M ? ? t I I

I ? I
I i
^
w 1 I ? ?
I I
I I
I i
? ? i t I ?
I ? '
i I i I I,
I I I
I
? I I
I . I I
I
I
I .
+.r
Nr = I
^
'O ,
? ?O
} v V ?p 100 ?p 1 ?O 6
O
I 6
N
I
N 00 0?
e+1 N N N
? G
00 r
' E"'
?
I
I N
V
O ..? O
N N N N
"" N 6
6
?
r•+
eV
O ? 1
N
N
O
D
N
I I i I I

p
I I
I I II
? X? 'e
I ' I I
? I I I
Z W ?, cod?
t: a W F
Ln 3
I
W I s
s
I s = _ •

W E
?
c
Is s s
?f
J> a z 3 j I j V I I I I I i
? I
I I
I i

S?

f+fr.? CAS o?
Z ti] ', N N N N N N
C en
LL)
N
?
?O
ms
I
?D ?D ?O
N to I ?p I ?D ?O en ON
?D
?D ?O ?O

?O ?O ?D ?O C
,
.
'
? f?1 ? ?. e
?
? ?D ?O ?O ?O I

= _ : s c
w s
O „r s c
•
I I I
?
G? ? K ?
O ?
I I I
z? a 3 I I! I I i I
J / I I
I
w I ?
I
o I I mca=nmm
amImcnIm m07C]CC
Ca Ca a1 cz
C7 C1 C] C] co m m I I
O
-
I
I I
-
F
I
u i ,
a Q o ' ?
U ? ? u
? v
? c u ul u u u? ul
am" c
l
l
= u u u u c? u u
° c
t
C
I = v u u
79
- v. u
?
?
-2
"-
!
Z !/1 VI u 7 9 19 .O -.3 b
'O I'fl 'O
J 'O 2
72
:? .N vi .N ?^ uu v I •? V V v ?'
I
c{
c '? '? 'v 'i v ??
? al 0l a
l
? ci a cr a i
cola C
CIC o:
p
?
?i??
??????
z c
cr. ,
I
_I
N? xz?_
l
_
?
.
?
cc ?IP,
? ^
_
t2 lo`clcc ,oC x l
x
x
x
I
v:
U ..:
I I I I I
Ir
'
a I I , I
C = I
I
0
H `
T ?
3 ..
o •°
V ?
? C
O `
_ O
u
K
a
c
}
R ?
N
u r
[O
u G.
? N
T V
ti .2
r r
C
u
'n N
u ? .o
x
c
%,-I6
J
M
M
G_
E-
0
?x .
Z w ?
Q O U
U
g?
W ?
ct
..I
v?

? C + - - _ - - _ ---
_ _
' ?
I
' O 1-I OCIr
l
0% im a'oo
%C .c ooI
ZZ ? la
x a
-
la a -, a'vs 00 a a
'o
c l sp
Z %D
ZZ sc ?Q a O
ala
?:. l ?o
I ? I , ,c
I
? l
l
i l
I
?
? X I• I •
! s Is !w '• ?• • • r Ir s i• • s • I
I •
r i• r r r '•
a I

g
I I I
? !I II" I i jl II I It
w j
I

?' I I I I
p I I I
I I i I
U I
.
I I I I I I
I 1 I
= d d?d? ?l a ? d d d b ,.? ? .?I ..? ..? d d d d d d d d d d d
r -
F
U
al
r
^ -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0'
0
0
o
0
0
01
0
0

0

0

0

0

N r
l
N
Q

N

N
m
"r
h
v;
m
%0
h
<
r
oo v;
?;
<
N
r•;
N
vi
N
v;
N
o0
N
0
Pf
w
N
o<
N
O Q I ? N N N N N N N N O N N N I
= I

u
?
? ev
?
? I
i
I
I
a • I I I

I i
_
I
=
I= =
=
?= I= = I= i= i= _ _ =

, I
I
Z Lil ..1 N v j

w O
N
..?
N
,p
ID N< d
%n po po p oo po po I pp
?D I i ?O I ?D ?O h I ?D s?? cis
rm i
i i
z? ? I ?
? ? I
I I I
?., G I ? ? 1 I I I I I
_ I

•

S I O
N
I N ?
I
i
I

l
z?,d 3 I y j ! I I
O v I I I
z o
? d m m u m m O m m m m m m m m W m m m m m m m m m m m
m I I
O u u u u I u V I u u u u u u u u v u u I u l lo
? N u u u ul3 u?? v u u u v a°i ul-v u u v(ulu u `ul-v,-uj?
IT N u IA N •w N
H •y N N N N N N h N Vl VI •VI •VI I •N
p 0 °, u u u u sl u ul wt u u v vi u u u u ui u ul u u v1 ul u u
t:-- z .:.Id ? ? ? d c:.ld,dlz:d d??lo:ldldld octd,ddl_I?I?:?'a,d
L i,- 'e?!.? I?r Ian ;r IoC _ O I_ e"
U a a ala a v?lai? x??ICIC;o 0101; - . - • - _ -- _I
0
ea ?
B •o
O p
O u
N u
a
o ?
w
? O
o0
o ca
• U
e
N
u r-
0 r-
a".
LLB„
n
y N
N ?.
T
r
e a
u
IA
•o
yl N
u u
c c

cn
C
cn
0
zx
w
w w/?
Hz
U
..r
M
c+?
i
G
r
O
C
m
m
U
>
CC

- - - - +.- - + - - + - + +

O w+ ooiolo c ,.. c v loo v1I%Z loo a Il Iz 14:.Ic lz

I ! r
n
? ? r r r ? r r r Ir r it Ir r I Is ! r Ir r r r r s r Ir

t.]

? I I I
p I I I I
I
U
I
I i
p
I
LU .a . . . . . .
.
. . . '
a
CL.

Il !I I? li i
i
P 4 o 0 0 0 0 o jc o c ? 0 0 0 0 0 Olo 0
0
0
'i
o
0
i
0
?
0
'i
0
ri
0
vi
0
v'i
3 y e+1 f V o0 C c e+i oC C e0 00 C vi
00 O?
N 00
N O
I O
N R
d'
(?1 l
v
I O
P^f
N
v
N
O
N
v
P'1
e
c'1
N
P?1
Q ? f+1 P?1 N N N N N
- -
N I- P1
I
D U = I I I -" '
i
F ? . I i ?
y p I I
i
= ?_
= _ _ =
_ = i=
=
= i= ?_ ?= I= _ _ =
?
•? _ i
I
I
?
_ _
_ _ _ _
Z O
0. z 0 I i I I I I I I I I I I
i
EE-- V1 ,
Z m ?-? v I
o

O
G oe oo
.I 0% C N N N cy? v O% T ?O 00 0o I C2% O o1, o0 00 O Oo
h h ?D .n .n v f .n ?O v1 v? v 1 ?O ?n
I
%O ?D \0 %0 .n O
?
I I
w ./ . / v 1 ?O
D
D
z
I
z ., a i l
d I ? i I I I I
?. Tn I I ? I I

u z 3 = =
ce p ^ - _ _ _

k? W a N y

y i I I I
1 I
z a ` n m m m m ml m m mm m co cu u u cm lm m m m m m cz m mm
O p
v o
a m ? I ! i '
I
V • 1
I I i I I
t I
?
?
I
I ? V
U uu
V
U U
C V V
U V V
U
?
I ? C V
a V

l V V V V
? V V
V
I ^' I ..
z
_ ?
y ?,
?;
?
'7 _

1

?

i '?

m i
?
u I'u
I ?
v u
1
u
7 N
u
C -- .
i.
u
.. N
u v' v
I
C,7i'C u

7 u

7 ^
u
7 I C
v
17 ^
?
7 u

'7 C
u
_ u? u

?
72 m
O
7 7
7 N N VI N N h .A V. N N I •N N
C I N vl v.
l N
l N N N N
l N N
V
I
V N
N N
r ?
m
?m
z
?z
?a
m
?Ir
z c=1a cr ? ? ac y.
WW l'1
.
'L
? w m u C - w Qd l
W <
V Ifs I0C 10? I^ ,?'.N IM I`T' V1 `:
^ OC
O, I^'-
IN
M'T I I .-.
OC I?
? - -? I
?""? ^ Iz IN iN ?N IN N IN IN N N
I N I''11? f?1 t'11? I?? ir'1IM Ir"• I''1'T
I
0
a,
o °
? C
? u
C N
' C
3
iA
u u
N
°
9 O
.
7 O
v
o
^ N
u ?
1J ?
a li
o U.
H fV
r?
F
7 i U
cc ct
O C-
- C
%-'- : S
Q
Z
i
24
OG
(7J?
C/]
0
L'

'?' x r r r--- - r r r r r r r r r r r r r
x
_

? c?'o -,p l?,._''31
I
` t?
I
?
i ?.71c? t?lt?lr`•c?ir`??: ?1?: .; V?IVti
•
v
,
`. r
r

t
a I I
I I I I; ! I I I I
> i
I ,

I , I I

I
Z ?' I I I I
! I ? I I I I I
? i
I ? I t ? I I I I, I
I I I I

? ' !I I 1
I ?
I
I IIII
I I I
I
I
Q 1 ; ! ; I I I
I
I.
I I
j
I , ?
?
I ?!
;
i
- 1 ! I I I ! I ?? I I I
v I I I I .. I I I i
I I I i I !
l I ?
I
^ =I -? ? airz'a ?;.? JI?I?IJ al?lcc a ocl? c?;?'?
l Ia;?
?
' cc
> .
= eu .T;-?I7 llo ?ol?o ?o .?I?o a <I?
I
I a
l al?
? v
viq
l v
-
y o lc;o °- 001 o:'o alit 'c o? ooI= M
CioC
I a leo
o o ?-; Y,
IM IM I? e6
,., I P, I M t
M
3 ('? V' IO '? N I N M ? ? N _ _
^ IM I M ? N N N IM M

Q M M; M V I I
I I i I I I I
3
I 1 I i i
1
U . ,
? Q w N I I I I ! I I I I I I
I
y I I I I

m
R j
?
_ .= ILLI I

his s s .s s Is Is = _ I= '_ ,= is '=
I
.I i
a Z o? o
I I
I
I ?
I
I
?
I ( I i
'
LU
? ?- ? I
t? Ala ? I
I I I I I ! i
o 0 0 "' M o? o 0 o?c? o o,alala alooloo
I
o
o
m p w ? $
?
?
S

?z-I I
I I I I I I I
? I? i i I I

LL) ]z

v n I I I

Z I
/? I
l U >

p

m m m

co I

m m

m

©I m m I m In

In Im p

LM Im CG p l n m
o co V Im
I
m I? ! I I I I, I I ! I
V •= '= I I I I i I I I
I
I
O i I
u'
I °? ul
l i
I w v
ul u u u l v o u
I u u
I u ?I u u u l t?
V u U u
?I
?iI I
w w w; u u u
=1 u c? ?I =
(n ?
I v?
>
I!
' V I .
V
V l =
CJ I :? 1 u w V V V I V u V V V V 'J :1 1 V •J i V I :J
OIL
. U^
'c17 - ^
71 ...1
7 17
'
1
71?
Vl VI I
Q O A I
v i v -I ? N I VI I N
'
? u v ' u Vl
VII N I N VI VI
l vl u ul u, v u
" N VI V)
ul v' u

'
'
' N
u

I N VI
ul u

G
' N N V7

.u, u
?
ul u vl v u
IC'C C!. ?ILr:C
F- .Z r a'iQ' LL. C'CIO' Q:
?iCICIC L iC d
G C a
IO
CG
i a _ IN .- .-. -r v 'z
.

i?
M
c
F
C
'O
V
N
C
D
Vl `
T ?
3 ?
o °
'C
o u
? y
= u
= S
? c
u
C a'i
` N
?r
u ?
r G
Vl N
Vl `
T
r
o n.
g. ' o
G
? v
o ?

Pr'i
M
G,
F-
C
y
r= U
Z
O U
U
C
Q ?
v
C/1

-
- - - - - - - - - - -

?
I j

' i I
. 1
' I ! ? !

I
I ! i 11 I?; .a ! I I i I;

I

C ! I; I I I I ? ; I 7 ? I I ? I I I I !
?
1 I I ;
I 1 ? ? I 1
I , I
1
I I I I i ? i I I I ? i
!

a I ? I? I ? ? I ! I? I
I !

? 1
I i
I ! I I I
I
I I
I I I I
1 j I 1 i ,
I I ?' '
-, V
r- a .aj? a-1 a Jl-j at.li.J -3 WC4w

3 Er
? .p r,
P?1 V1 ? ? I?IN

^ ? NI

r ? NI

^ ?IO?
N
A aIN!v
f?1 N V1 0o
?f N OLIN
N
N O e 01r1a1o? -+ O
N I? N I f'1 f'1
t'?1 P1 ?f
p ° I
I I ,
I I
I
o ? 3 I ! 1 ? 1 I I i ? ? ? l ! I ! I I
?., o: U .? I I I ? 1 I I I I
° I l i !
w R
I i I
I ,
?
,
Z 2 W ,, t s a t s t s
a s s s s I t s = a s
s
c s s s s 1 s ! c

a Z o I I' ? I I
? i
I I I

? 1 I
? I I I l i
I
F I I I I I , I I

O Q
c Q\ 1
h ?o I Zo
:G N ?+ N N O% v
I ?o I G ON T
"m %n I ?o ?O 00
vl 1n 0o O? O O+ o0 00 I ' oo I r t-
?., %n ID %n
W
Z i a I
I ?? I I
i
? I j ? I I
I
1 j I I I
v? o - ? 1 I l u I I I I
z 3
I
I
I
I
I
• '
i
I
'
'
? F p r? . : 1: a
! = z : = : = 1= I= = js I= I: : _ : s
s
s
_
s ;: :
I
W O

Z a N
N

I

I I

I

I l i l

1 1

v ! I I I I 1
Z ? C i>a © W m A W I
CO C1 CO C7 W U U m m Q m d C1 G] C] C1 b C] i CJ C]

O Cc I I
I I I

p[
° <

N __ I
w ujVIV
ulU u U
l I
u .1 L)
u u
I
v I
uI I
u N I I
Iu
NI N' !
ulu
I
u
IV I
u'u
u V
I I! I
u.ululu
i lu1?.e I I
u u!u

'
? 31 uj vl u
7 ? 7 "J ui u
u
? "J17 ? v
'J ui ^?=
'3
. ? ?' ?I u
?. -I? v1 v
'J 7
? u
u
?I? l vl uj vj u
!7'7 7 7 u
u w
7' ?'••?

°
C N' N N N
ul u
ul u
? h 1A 1 VI
uI v
u VI
I u _
h •?
?I
u
I •; •? ! N
7!
u N N
u u H
u N N
u1 u II N 1 Vl IA
I u vl ul u H N N
1 u' ul u
Q .
I
c_ICIC;CIC I
O:.C.C IC I
ceI©IU ?i1
r-11% C C W ,w1C IC:C,C:C CIC CL'
LL: f, le+:I-r
IM1iac O', i IV1 ,= r =!c i =. ^
N , IT I,n I.:,'Ih x,^!",. N
=
N
1 =1N' tV
N NIN N N N •,
M ,-. 1=.I?, !'-•. .-. -.1 ",iT T T
j
1 1
0
3
` o
v
ar C
O p
x
? C
r
N
? N
U ?
g ?
? c
0 1O
• U
N
u r
v Gam.
? LL
n
H N
H y
h
O C
•o
o=
? r.
u u
O C
t
A' --2f)
O
? X
zw
J
.r
?.r
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

_

L
? I I ? I
I i? I
j
IPi ' I^r I
I ??

r?rlr'rl t
?

C;c?lCl-?-?-? 1 1 1 ?
t i p

c?^'P?P PAP xi 1
I

xlc,1 x
? I
I ? I
? I
? I I I
w w Is w w • • ?w ?
I
w i• # I: I• • I
a • w w w • Iw w • ?+
? ? I I ; I I
W '? I I ? I I I I ? ?
? I I I I i I
I
I I i

? I I
z ? l j i I ; I I I
Q ? , j I I ? j I

a L I i
l I
I (
V
-- I
.?? I I
?a I I I I
I
I I I ,I ?
xl?I
I I I I
ocICIaI xI CIaI ?
_ m vI ?D
? ?OI`: ?D ?I?
?
I ? ?OIO ?I ? ?I ??
'
3 F •c .C r 06 P O 00I --IO C%
I NI N O?
I 06 r
r PIP1N
-.
N .r NIA
N N I N rI
N ?DINI
N N V
N
V N u P"5 N e+1 I f•'1 N N I N
r l
.? I I

o ? 3 3 I
I I I
F ? V ? I ? I
.
? h ? 1 I I I I
y H 1
1
I I
'
I
I
I
W ,, 3 ,, s s t
I s c
s Is s c s I
I s Is
s s
s Ic c s t s s s
t
Q I I I t
G. Z O O I ? ? I
I I ?I I I ;I
I I
{
.
. rn I I ..
1
.
?
0> LU
o -a
eo -Z
p, R
O 0
0
0 0
0
. V% O
?D
O I O 1 O 1 O I^ O?
v?
?C ?D ?O ?D ?O
O?
v?
P I P 00 I oo
?n v? v?
v?
I P
v?
I -•
?O
m a I
z I
u r
N_ N I I I I I
I
z 3 s ^ -° . {
1
1
i
t .
t
. . .
F. o .. ? .. _ t . . t . Ic . c . . . {. s s t
. .
I
a CP, ? N ?
I
I
I
I j
'
i
{ I I
z I
In N I I I I I '
a > I I I I
z a G U p lm m lm m m m m m mm m mim m mlmlm m mlm m mm m
z
I I I I
C {•U OD O
D I { ' ? i ? ? I I I
t'.'"' _
I I ? I I
U - = 1 I I
I
Q

o I- u

`o
I c u
c v u

^. c I uj ul u

ti u u u
c
' c l- u+v

u u
c I- u

c ^

u u
c l c
ulluI uI ui vl u
I coil ul ^
c j- ! c c, c l c l i s
3 {3 I
c l
l ?
" u v
?
lY
?
Y
Q Q ?i?lu
I a?i
I lu v
I u u
c?i
w
I
I u:cii
I l u
I
le
i'u t
i
I
I
ily v u u
ile
c
i,
i'c
CICIC'CIC;CICIC
I
I
r- Z tz. CIL!C C IC
C C
'
C."''..•
,C CIC C C!C
C C•
C
{:W "1
Y' OC
It^
Q P' IN
?? ??'=',=. ! Ir oC
r la! ;v1 it !cc IP c
u ..? ;
.
I I
`
C I ^
I I
.
C?
1
r•„
0
r.
m
V
.D
c
U
t0
L1
OC
a, Do
R Do
R p
o •?
C
o?
x
o R
? o
C H
Q u
N
:J
'fl G
?o
c m
1O u
c a
•? U
c
? R
- N
r
r
? R
?a
H
•? U
H N
N `
T
r
G L
? u
V N
?= C
c c
V Y
? V
:J 'J

s
C/1
G
0
zx
W
r~M
°z
U
Q
M
G
G
0
U
a?
L
r r r r r r r .r _- r r- r r r ^ r r r r r r

i i I I ? I I l ? ? I I I I
I
oc i 00 r- 1 C` I oc ( C\ ice ' `ll i v R S.
C, I \', oo i'c V•, I V1 _ C1 1- V1 r v'i •a
?IZr

? ? i I I I l ! I
I i
?
I
i
I i
? i I I I i

I
0 ? i I I ? t '
i
I I ? I i I
I I ?
? I

'fl
l
j
i I
i?
I I i
I I
I
U ?
I I
l

Q ., ? < ?? <<Qe< v a ?o a a ??Iee vi?p ?o ?o < .? ? ?
i ?
? .?
;
F vi vi oo 'S'
i
4 I C "'
(
4 v C °? e'•' ? o° I C G e? - V
'•
3 _N V N N C4 r4
N
N N
N N C M
M 01 N M M 1 N C M e" m 1 of m m 1 I_ N N en en !r ? ? ?
?

3

v
j
I
i I I

o
N
I l
l
i I I
I
I
W
? ? i i j i I I
I
I i i I I
O
z 1 ,, s e Ia Is s Is la Is I s 1: la js js I:
a Is
I e s s a e a a :

w Z
o !
I I I
! ! I I I I I
I I I
i I I ?
? I

i
a I i I
?.
I I (
W w ,fl I
v
I
I
> l0

o _
?
^' O N N N O? V
I
I
m 0o O% O
v
I
o? 00 00
O
\0
r n h
oG f+ 1- Ol
r I %n %n
h
m a ?O ?D ?O ?O \C
?%
h
a
? r V7 ?p
r r h
I I .
Z
?., , e
I

F- v < is.
I
MZ3 = ? j I -I
'
l
? _ = a = _ = a = a a = = s Ia s a is = a
Is =
I=
s s a

R O N y I I
Z
?

a I I
I
I
?{ I
I
I
I
I
CAI i I I
i i I ?
o a o m m m m m m ? u m m m m mm ao m m m m m m u

i 7
Op I
C ? I i
.L

c I
u u I
vlulu I ;
vlul I •I I
I t,' j
?+'I?i j?+ uiv

u U a
lvl°
u U
U u
' uju
U H
U
;
V

3 u u
C C u u u
C C, C
I u u N
C N
Clu
l N N
N N C
u u u C C
ulu , C
u C
u'u
Cu C
Cu
C ulu .
..
C' C V+
lul_Iu
C = _ u u
:O 'fl u
u u
I I 'C
I :C u
u
'v I :p I
C I C i ._ l
Q
? C• N O N
u
u _
N N? N
I .
N N I?
u "?? ? j? ? ?N
u I ?N N
u u I •V)
u , N N
? u u h
u N Y. V.
u I v i u N N N h
u I u u
_ Z ?
tr ,
t
lC'a u
u u
CIC'C u:
ICICIC IuImICIC' IC C Ia' alc la a!LiQ' {?ICICIC
l: ?]
If+Ioc:a1O
O?i^I_IN N
I

j?
If+l oc 1. 'C ?' N
,+ . = f-, If-.
_ N '4'f%4 N N N N t-4 CV N I f^.
C
oc
N `
cc oc
3
o •o
v c
O p
c !'
K
v V
C C=
} C
v
c of
c ?
u r
j R
= a
C ?
r^.
N N
? V
? G
c C
N
V N
u u
C C
u u

tr)
z
n
Q
N
Q
u
Q?
u
O
Q
3

M
M
3t
L` .
O
U
U
y
co
I I

ma c.,
Q? U
c
G O N1
?+
I
.. K r N r^. N C
r?
!
C U -

x x
fn x
? N N
f4
N N
14
LLU
u en M fn f-. r
^
O z
a
00w *0

N

rn
00 x i
x I
Q

z

'
V
1 .p V ? r t` r I r r ?
72

m i C -3-
u r.
p
C i a

G. '?' u I L7.
ce C
o o .= I © o
i
- p OD
C O-D
.
LL) p
o "
I C op
•'S V
?, v to
?.
3 Y 3 1

N
- u 3 3
a
v 3
,

a ? to L' i N LLJ r
r?
y
C1
W
O
V
v
v
W V
O V

W
u .?
v
7
u
H C.*
? U
= e
u :?
r.
N 9
= o
_- Q
? 7
- lC
V N

M
M
E U
z
r
j U
O
z 5
J
c
Q
^oo
i
I L
1 < .r
>
- ;5

< ? N ... ... .... ?. N
LL3 C _
+? O Z
..r Z i

a

?
U e
c
...
_
c
..
_
o
c
c
z i
N

LU

J
-
cn
o ?
z
z ? I
Li]

x
w
h
N
P?'1 I
?
Q
Q
?'
N
N
a I
o
I

V K
I
e'^.
O ?
O
?
r'+
I O
O
1
y
a

° '
u _ _ ? _ o o 0 0
I

I
? I
i-
O

__ V C
:J I 7

Z d i
O c L
• ; ©
?'
r .? u p ? ? ep
U z
V ? _
u m

-
u c _
_ C =
G o C
0 3
u
? u
x 3
u
- _ N

f" = I = u cn © in
- -

c?
m
a
O
J
v
N
Z
` LU
u C7
F-
:J
u
7 ?
u u
u u

1
9
APPENDIX 3
Federal Emercrenc?- N1,111acrement Agent- v
)J ire rn
11 izr-iu.?e?
July 14, 1998
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
State of North Carolina Department of
Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Attention: Craig Young, Project Planning Engineer
?G E 1 V
Jo-
19981,
Reference: TIP Project No. U-3311, widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401
(Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass, Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, Federal Aid No. STP-1141 (7), State Project No.
8.2442901
Dear Mr. Young:
This is in response to the letter of June 26, 1998, in which Mr. Gilmore requested a
review of the potential environmental impacts of the above-stated project in the City of
Fayetteville and Cumberland County, North Carolina.
The responsibility for issuing permits for construction in floodplains, and for reviewing
projects to determine that appropriate construction standards have been met, rests with
the local government's permitting office in whose political jurisdiction the project is
located.
Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are required
to issue development permits for all types of construction within the 100-year floodplain
as shown on Flood Hazard Boundary Maps or Flood Insurance Rate Maps provided by
the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Title 44 CFR, Section 60.3. Therefore,
your office should contact the appropriate community to obtain a development permit if
your project is to be located in the floodplain.
This office does not provide project reviews unless requested by local governments on
more complex developments, or on Federal agency projects located in floodplains. To
assist you in your own reviews, we are enclosing a community status list for the State of
North Carolina. This list includes all cities and counties participating in the NFIP, the
Community Identification number, and the latest date of their flood map.
If this office can provide further information, please advise.
Sincerely,
A. Todd Davison, Director,
Mitigation Division
Enclosures
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Communities Participating in the National Flood Program
CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective '
[Ewer or Reg] Map
"NORTH CAROLINA
370165# ABERDEEN, TOWN OF MOORE COUNTY 05/15/86(8) 12/15/89
370131A AHOSKILTOWN OF HERTFORD COUNTY 05/01/87(R) 05/01/87(L)
3700010 AIAMANCE COUNTY' AIAMANCE COUNTY I2/01/81(R) 04/0387
370457# ALAMANCE, VILLAGE OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 12/1787(R) 0811580
370223# ALBEIvIARLE, CITY OF STANLY COUNTY 12/0181(R) 12/0181
370398# ALEXANDER COUNTY' ALEXANDER 02/0119 1(R) 0210119 1(L)
COUNTY
370404# ALLIANCE, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 08/0585(R) 08/0585
370060# ANDREWS, TOWN OF CHEROKEE COUNTY 02/0185(R) 0210185
370284# ANSON COUNTY • ANSON COUNTY 06/18/90(8) 06/18/90
370467# APEX, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 03/2A/92(R) 12/05196
370273# ARCHDALE, CITY OF RANDOLPH COUNTY 07/16/81(R) 07/1681
370007# ASHE COUNTY • ASHE COUNTY 08/16/88(R) 08/1688
370196# ASHEBORO, ITY OF RANDOLPH COUNTY 07/1681(R) 07/1681
370032# ASHEVILLE, CITY OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY 07/1680(R) 05/06196
370044# ATLANTIC BEACH, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 03/15/77(R) 08/18/92
370014# AURORA, CITY OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 01/0386(R) 01/0386
370358# AUTRYVLLLE,TOWN OF SAMPSON COUNTY 02/0187(R) 02/0187(L)
370010# AVERY COUNTY • AVERY COUNTY 09/28/90(8) 09128/90
370189# AYDEN,TOWN OF P= COUNTY 08/0487(R) 08/04/87(M)
370162# BAKERSVILLE, TOWN OF MITCHELL COUNTY 05/0187(8) 09/02/88
370442# BALD HEAD ISLAND. VILLAGE OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 05/1586(R) 05103/93
370011# BANNER ELK, TOWN OF AVERY COUNTY 01/1588(R) 0111588
370288# BATH, TOWN OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 04MM7(R) 02/0487
370183# BAYBORO, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 1210485(R) 12/0485
370013# BEAUFORT COUNTY' BEAUFORT COUNTY 0?/0487(R) 02/0487
375346# BEAUFORT, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 12/01r72(R) 10/1883
370015# BELHAVEN, TOWN OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 05/16/77(R) 01/0386
370320# BELMONT, CITY OF GASTON COUNTY I I101n9(R) 11/01/79
3702900 BERTIE COUNTY BERTIE COUNTY 12/0485(R) 12/0485
370033# BLACK MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY 04/1580(R) 05/06/96
3702930 BLADEN COUNTY' BLADEN COUNTY 09/0189(R) 09/0189(L)
37002A# BLADENBORO, TOWN OF BLADEN COUNTY 07/1786(R) 07117/86(K
370252# BLOWING ROCK TOWN OF WATAUGA COUNTY 06101/78(R) 01/17/97
370491# BOGUS, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 05/05/97(R)
THE TOWN OF BOGUE HAS ADOPTED THE CARTERET
COUNTY [370043] FIRM DATED 12-19-96.
3704530 BOILING SPRING LAKES, CITY OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 03/MM9(R) 12/15/90
370274A BOLTON, TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 0710187(R) 07/01187(L)
370253# BOONE, TOWN OF WATAUGA COUNTY 09wng(R) 01/17/97
3702310 BREVARD, CITY OF TRANSYLVANIA 09/29nsm 03/02/98
COUNTY
370436# BRIDGETON, TOWN OF CRAVEN COUNTY 05M4/87(R) 05/0487
370051# BROOKFORD, TOWN OF CATAWBA COUNTY 12119n9(R) 12/18!19
370295# BRUNSWICK COUNTY' BRUNSWICK COUNTY 05/1586(R) 08118/92
370228# BRYSON CITY, CITY OF SWAIN COUNTY 12/0484(R) 12/0484
370031# BUNCOMBE COUNTY • BUNCOMBECOUNTY 08/0180(R) 05/06/96
370483 BURGAW, CITY OF PENDER COUNTY 12/05/96
370034# BURKE COUNTY • BURKE COUNTY 06117/9 1(R) 06/22/98 >
370002# BURLINGTON, CITY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 04101/81(R) 04/01/8I
Pan 1 of 12 ().1 " ?'W"
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Dote Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
370373# BURNSVILLE, TOWN OF YANCEY COUNTY 0411784(R) 04/17/84
370036# CABARRUS COUNTY • CABARRUS COUNTY 05/0581(R) 08103/89
370452# CAJUN MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF CALDWELL COUNTY 03/06/90(8) 08/16/88
370395# CALABASH, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 02/04/88(8) 02/04/88
370039# CALDWELL COUNTY • CALDWELL COUNTY 0B11688(R) 08/16/88
370042# CAMDEN COUNTY • CAMDEN COUNTY 12/04185(R) 12/04/85
370121C CANTON, TOWN OF HAYWOOD COUNTY 02102r17(R) 01/2282
370046# CAPE CARTERET, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 04/OIM(R) 10/1883
375347# CAROLINA BEACH, TOWN OF NEW HANOVER 05/02115(R) 09/04/86
COUNTY
370275# CARRBORO, TOWN OF ORANGE COUNTY 06 2snfi(R) 02/0980(M)
370043# CARTERET COUNTY • CARTERET COUNTY 05/1580(R) 12/19/96
370238# CARY, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 07/17/78(R) 12105/96
370391# CASWELL BEACH, CITY OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 01/17/86(R) 04102/91
370050# CATAWBA COUNTY • CATAWBA COUNTY 09/0380(R) 08/02/94
370052# CATAWBA. TOWN OF CATAWBA COUNTY 09/0380(R) 09/0380
370465# CEDAR POINT, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 07/2689(R) 02/16/94
USE THE CARTERET COUNTY [370043] FIRM.
370311A CERRO GORDO, TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 07/0386(R) 07/0386(M)
370065# CHADBOURN, TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 09%3087(R) 09/3087(M)
3701800 CHAPEL HILL, TOWN OF DURHAM COUNTY 04117178(R) 08/0183
ORANGE COUNTY
370159# CHARLOTTE, CITY OF MECKLENBURG 08115r78(R) 01/06/94
COUNTY
370299# CHATHAM COUNTY CHATHAIb_GOUNTY 03104197(R) 07/16191
370059# CHEROKEE COUNTY • CHEROKEE COUNTY 02/0289(R) 07/19!93
370487 CHIMNEY ROCK, VILLAGE OF RUTHERFORD 02114/97(R)
COUNTY
THE VILLAGE OF CHIMNEY ROCK HAS ADOPTED
THE RUTHERFORD COUNTY [370217) FIRM DATED
6-1-87.
3702100 CHINA GROVE, TOWN OF ROWAN COUNTY 12/Z1r18(R) 09/29/18
370289 CHOCOWINITY, TOWN OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 06/30/97(R)
THE TOWN OF CHOCOWLNITY HAS ADOPTED THE
BEAUFORT COUNTY (370013) FIRM DATED 24-87
PANEL NO 0190B
370301# CHOWAN COUNTY • CHOWAN COUNTY 07/0385(R) 07/0385
370021B CLARKTON, TOWN OF BLADEN COUNTY 07/0386(R) 07/03/86(M)
3700630 CLAY COUNTY CLAY COUNTY 03/09194 0711781
370139# CLAYTON, TOWN OF JOHNSTON COUNTY 04?0182(R) 04/0182
370302# CLEVELAND COUNTY' CLEVELAND COUNTY 100/95(R) 07102/91
370263A CLINTON. CITY OF SAMSON COUNTY 07/02/7S(R) 01/0187(L)
370122# CLYDE, TOWN OF HAYWOOD COUNTY 12/0183(R) 12/0183
370233# COLUMBIA. TOWN OF TYRREL T COUNTY 0&V5/85(R) 08/0585
370305# COLUMBUS COUNTY • COLUMBUS COUNTY 06103/91(R) 06103191
370037# CONCORD, CITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY 03MM80(R) 11/02/94
3700530 CONOVER. TOWN OF CATAWBA COUNTY 09/0380(R) 09/0380
370174A CONWAY, TOWN OF NORTHAMPTON 08/01/87(R) 08/0187(L)
COUNTY
370498 CORNELIUS, TOWN OF MECKLENBURG 09/30/97(R)
COUNTY
THE TOWN OF CORNELIUS HAS ADOPTED THE.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY (370158) FIRMM DATED 213/93
PANELS 0005, 0015, 0020.
370321# CRAMERTON, TOWN OF GASTON COUNTY 05/21/92(R) 03/0480
370072# CRAVEN COUNTY* CRAVEN COUNTY 05104/87(R) 12105/97
370107# CRF-EDMOOR CITY OF GRANVILLE COUNTY 06r-,5n6(R) 09/28/90
Page 2 of 12 ()5i0s/9s
•,, Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg) Map
37044300 CRESWELL, TOWN OF WASHINGTON 08/19/85(R) 02/04187
COUNTY
370287# CROSSNORE. TOWN OF AVERY COUNTY 0S119/86(R) 08/19/86(M)
370076# CUMBERLAND COUNTY • CUMBERLAND 02/1782(R) 02/1782
COUNTY
370078# CURRI'IUCK COUNTY • CURRTTIJCK COUNTY 11/0184(8) 07/03/95
370322 DALLAS, TOWN OF GASTON COUNTY 05/01/94(8) 05/01/94(L)
370363# DANBURY. TOWN OF STOKES COUNTY 07/1687(R) 07116/87(M)
3753480 DARE COUNTY' DARE COUNTY 10/06/78(R) 04/03/95
370307# DAVIDSON COUNTY' DAVIDSON COUNTY 05/0180(R) 05/18198 >
370503 DAVIDSON, TOWN OF MECKLENBURG 10/16/97(8)
COUNTY
THE TOWN OF DAVIDSON HAS ADOPTED THE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY (370158) FIRM DATED 2-3-93
PANELS 10, 20.25
370308# DAVIE COUNTY • DAVIE COUNTY 03/2180(R) 12/17/93
370136# DILI.SBORO, CITY OF JACKSON COUNTY 05/15/96(R) 02/06/91
370297A DREXEL TOWN OF BURKE COUNTY 08/19/96(R) 08/19/96(00)
3702640 DUNN, CITY OF HARNETT COUNTY 09/Q486(R) 04/16190
370083# DUPLIN COUNTY • DUPLIN COUNTY 07/0489(R) 07/04/89
370085# DURHAM COUNTY • DURHAM COUNTY 02/15/79(R) 02/02/96
370086# DURHAM, CITY OF DURHAM COUNTY 01117r/9(R) 02/02196
370496 EAST ARCADIA, TOWN OF BLADEN COUNTY 06/30/97(8)
THE TOWN OF EAST ARCADIA HAS ADOPTED THE
BLADEN COUNTY (370293) FIRM DATED 9-1-89
PANELS 0012 AND 0013.
370211# EAST SPENCER TOWN OF ROWAN COUNTY 07/03/78(8) 12/11/91
370401# EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS CHEROKEE COUNTY 05/1789(R) 05/17/99
GRAHAM COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
SWAIN COUNTY
370206# EDEN. CITY OF ROCKINGHAM 01/05!78(8) 01105/78
COUNTY
370062# EDENTON. TOWN OF CHOWAN COUNTY 09/15M(R) 07/0385
3700870 EDGECOMBE COUNTY • EDGECOMBE 08/03/81(R) 0810381
COUNTY
370185# ELIZABETH CITY, CITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY 04/03/78(8) 08/05/95
PASQUOTANK
COUNTY
' 370027E ELIZABETHTOWN. TOWN OF BLADEN COUNTY 07/1786(R) 07117/86(M)
370382A ELK PARK, TOWN OF AVERY COUNTY 04/1586(R) 04/15/86(M)
370411# ELON COLLEGE, TOWN OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 06/0589(R) 06/05/89(1)
370047# EMERALD ISIS, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 04/01M(R) 03/04/85
370115A ENFIELD, TOWN OF HALIFAX COUNTY O6/25l76(R) 06/2 n6(M)
370456# ERWIN, TOWN OF HARNETT COUNTY 02/28/97(R) 04/16/90
3700670 FAIR BLUFF,TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 06101/87(R) 12107J92
370205# FAIRMONT, TOWN OF ROBESON COUNTY 09/0187(R) 02/17/93
370495 FAISON. TOWN OF DUPLIN COUNTY 06/30/97(8)
SAMPSON COUNTY
THE TOWN OF FAISON HAS ADOPTED THE DUPL.IN
COUNTY (370083) FIRM DATED 7-4.89 AND THE
SAMPSON COUNTY (370220) FIRM DATED 7-16.91.
THE TOWN OF FAISON HAS ADOPTED THE DUPLIN
COUNTY (370083) FIRM DATED 789 AND THE
SAMPSON COUNTY (370220) FIRM DATED 7-16-91.
370190# FARMVII. TOWN OF PITT COUNTY 04/O1/82(R) 04/1789
Pabc 3 of 12 05/08/98

Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Dale Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
370077# FAYETTEVILLF- CITY OF CUMBERLAND 10/17n8(R) 06115/84
COUNTY
370218B FOREST CITY, TOWN OF RUTHERFORD 06117/86(R) 06/17186(M)
COUNTY
375349# FORSYTH COUNTY • FORSYTH COUNTY 09/01n2(R) 12117193
370402# FO)UME, VILLAGE OF MOORE COUNTY 02/14/97(8) 12115/89
370377# FRANKLIN COUNTY' FRANKLIN COUNTY 02121/97 09/15/78
370497 FRANKI.INTON, TOWN OF FRANKLIN COUNTY 07/30/97
370197A , TOWN OF RANDOLPH COUNTY 07/01/87(8) 07/01/87(L)
370492 FREMONT, TOWN OF WAYNE COUNTY 05/27/97(8)
THE TOWN OF FREMONT HAS ADOPTED THE WAYNE
COUNTY (370254) FIRM DATED 9-30-83.
370239# FUQUAY-VARINA, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY I UOlns(R) 12/05/96
370240# GARNER, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 0wmn8(R) 12119/97
370099# GASTON COUNTY • GASTON COUNTY 05/0180(R) 05101/80
370100# GASTONIA. CITY OF GASTON COUNTY 02/OInB(R) 02116194
370103# GATES COUNTY • GATES COUNTY 07/16/91(R) 07/101
370104E GATESVILI.E, TOWN OF GATES COUNTY 05113n7(R) 05/13/77(K
370387# GIBSONVILLE, TOWN OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 05115/80(8) 0511580
GUILFORD COUNTY
370255# GOLDSBORO, CITY OF WAYNE COUNTY 06/01/82(R) 03/16198
370105# GRAHAM COUNTY GRAHAM COUNTY 07/17186(8) 07/17/86(#)
370283# GRAHAM, CITY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 11/19/80(8) 09/17/92
370414# GRANITE FALLS, TOWN OF CALDWELL COUNTY 08/1688(R) 08/1688
370212# GRANITE QUARRY, TOWN OF ROWAN COUNTY 09115n8(R) 09115n8
370325# GRANVILLE COUNTY' GRANVIL LE COUNTY 02/20/97(8) 09/28190
370378# GREENE COUNTY • GREENE COUNTY 06112195(R) 01/06/83
375351# GREENSBORO, CITY OF GUILFORD COUNTY 04/16171(R) 12/0589
370191# GREENVI LE, CITY OF PITT COUNTY 07/03n8(R) 0413086
370192# GRIFTON, TOWN OF LENOIR COUNTY 02/17/82(R) 11/1683
PITT COUNTY
370111N GUILFORD COUNTY • GUILFORD COUNTY 06/0480(R) 05/18198 >
370327# HALIFAX COUNTY • HALIFAX COUNTY 05/05/81(R) 05/05/81
370334# HAMILTON, TOWN OF MARTIN COUNTY 01/01/87(R) 01/01B7(L)
3702000 HAMLET, CITY OF RICHMOND COUNTY 07/07187(R) 09/06/89
370328# HARNETT COUNTY • HARNETTCOUNTY 04/16190(R) 04/16/90
370038# HARRISBURG, TOWN OF CABARRUS COUNTY 06/30n6(R) 11/04/94
370265# HAVELOCK, CITY OF CRAVEN COUNTY 05/04/87(R) 05/04/87
370003# HAW RIVER, TOWN OF ALAMANCE COUNTY 11/0580(R) 11/03/80
3701200 HAYWOOD COUNTY' HAYWOOD COUNTY 07/15/84(R) 07/1584
370367A HENDERSON, CITY OF VANCE COUNTY O&VA7(R) 08/0487(M)
370128# HENDERSONVILLE. CITY OF HENDERSON COUNTY 0112082(R) 01/202
3701300 HERTFORD COUNTY HERTFORD COUNTY 10106195 06/07!78
370188# HERTFORD, TOWN OF PERQUIMANS 07/0385(R) 07/0385
COUNTY
370034# HICKORY, CITY OF CATAWBA COUNTY 08/03/81(R) 08/0381
370113# HIGH POINT, CITY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY 11/Oln9(R) 05/18198 >
GUILFORD COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
370343# HILLSBOROUGH, TOWN OF ORANGE COUNTY 05/1580(R) 05/1580
370116B HOBGOOD, TOWN OF HALIFAX COUNTY 07/Oin7(R) 07/Oln7(M)
370397# HOKE COUNTY • HOKE COUNTY 03/02/89(R) 03/07189
375352# HOLDEN BEACH. TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 05r26n2(R) 04107191
370403# HOLLY SPRINGS, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY I2/23/94(R) 12/05/96
370312# HOPE MILLS, TOWN OF CUMBERLAND 11/04/81(R) 11/0481
COUNTY
1'agc 4 01 ! '
05/0"8

Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration

CID Community Name County Dale Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
370153# HOT SPRINGS, TOWN OF MADISON COUNTY 07/0582(R) 07/0582
370450# HUDSON, TOWN OF CALDWELL COUNTY 03/06/90(R) 0811688(M)
370478 HUNTERSVILL.E. TOWN OF MECKIENBURG 01/11/95
COUNTY
3701330 HYDE COUNTY' HYDE COUNTY 02/04/87(R) 10/16192
370433# INDIAN BEACH, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 03/0485(R) 06/08/98 >
370235# INDIAN TRAIL TOWN OF UNION COUNTY OM2180(R) 01/17197
370313# IREDELL COUNTY • IREDELL COUNTY 05/1580(R) 06172198 >
370282# JACKSON COUNTY • JACKSON COUNTY 05/1789(R) 05/1789
370175B JACKSON,TOWN OF NORTHAMPTON 07AnA7(R) 07/02/87(M)
COUNTY
370178# JACKSONVILLE, CITY OF ONSL.OW COUNTY 02/1585(R) 02/1585
3701140 JAMESTOWN. TOWN OF GUILFORD COUNTY 03/04/80(R) 03/0480
370008# JEFFERSON, TOWN OF ASHE COUNTY 08116/88(R) 08/1688
370138# JOHNSTON COUNTY • JOHNSTON COUNTY 09/3083(R) 11/02195
3703790 JONES COUNTY • JONES COUNTY 08/16/88(R) 08/16/88
370260A JONESVILLE, TOWN OF YADKIN COUNTY 0710187(R) 07/01/87(L)
370469# KANNAPOLIS, CITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY 03/25191(R)
ROWAN COUNTY
370399E KENANSVILLE. TOWN OF DUPLIN COUNTY 07/1786(R) 07/1786(M)
375353# KILL DEVIL HILLS, CITY OF DARE COUNTY OYD4/73(R) 04/02193
370458# KING, CITY OF STOKES COUNTY 07/O489(R) 07/04/89
370304E KINGS MOUNTAIN, CITY OF CLEVELAND COUNTY 0413086(R) 04J30186(M)
370145# KINSTON, CITY OF LENOIR COUNTY 0611582(R) 06/1582
370439# KITTY HAWK, TOWN OF DARE COUNTY 10/06/78(R) 04/02193
3702410 KNIGHTDALE, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 08/01/78(8) 12/19197
3701700 KURE BEACH, TOWN OF NEW HANOVER 0IMA2(R) 04/02/86
COUNTY
370488 LAKE LURE, TOWN OF RUTHERFORD 03104/97(8)
COUNTY
THE TOWN OF LAKE LURE HAS ADOPTED THE
RUTHERFORD COUNTY [370217] FIRM DATED 6/187.
370069B LAKE WACCAMAW, TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 06/03/86(8) O&M/96(M)
3702130 LANDIS. TOWN OF ROWAN COUNTY 07/03r78(R) 07103/78
370374# LANSING, TOWN OF ASHE COUNTY 08/05/86(R) 0811688
370222# LAURINBURG, CITY OF SCOTLAND COUNTY 01/0386(R) 01/0386
370331# LEE COUNTY • LEE COUNTY 09/06/89(R) 09/0689
370317# LEGGETT, TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 03/04197 07/01M
COUNTY
370471# LELAND, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY IO/19192(R) 10(15193
370144# LENOIR COUNTY • LENOIR COUNTY' 01/06/83(R) 01/06/83
3700400 LENOIR. CITY OF CAL.DWEL L COUNTY 08/1688(R) 08/1688
370081# LEXINGTON, CITY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY 11/01/79(R) 11/01!79
370381# LILLINGTON, TOWN OF HARNETT COUNTY 09/0486(R) 04/16190
370146# LINCOLN COUNTY • LJNCOL N COUNTY 12/0181(R) 06122198 >
3701470 LINCOLNTON, CITY OF LINCOLN COUNTY I2/01181(R) 12/01/91
375354# LONG BEACH, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 03/26nI(R) 05/03193
370055# LANG VIEW, TOWN OF CATAWBA COUNTY 09/0380(R) 09/0380
3700980 LOUISBURG. CITY FRANKLIN COUNTY 03/04/88(R) 03/04/88
3703230 LOWELL. CITY OF GASTON COUNTY 03/05190(R) 03105190
370203# LUMBERTON. CITY OF ROBESON COUNTY 11/05/80(R) 02/17/93
370090# MACCLESFIELD. TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 03/2580(R) 03/1880
COUNTY
370152# MADISON COUNTY • MADISON COUNTY 09/0282(R) 09/0282
370207# MADISON, TOWN OF ROCKINGHAM I1/16177(R) 11/16/77
COUNTY
370389# MAGGIE VALLEY, TOWN OP HAYWOOD COUNTY 04/1784(R) 04117/84
Pag_ 5 of 12 051,06/98
•,, Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
370056# MAIDEN, TOWNSHIP OF CATAWBA COUNTY 09/03180(8) 09/0380
375355# MANTEO,TOWN OF DARE COUNTY 0imm(R) 12/04/85
370266# MARION, CITY OF MCDOWELL COUNTY 05/0187(R) 02/05197
370385# MARS HILL, TOWN OF MADISON COUNTY 08/19/87(R) 08/1987
370154# MARSHALL. TOWN OF MADISON COUNTY 05/15n8(R) 05115!78
370155# MARTIN COUNTY • MARTIN COUNTY 07/16191(R) 07/16191
370310 MATTHEWS, TOWN OF MECIQ.ENBURG 0111185
COUNTY
370208# MAYODAN, TOWN OF ROCKINGHAM 07/18r77(R) 07/18/77
COUNTY
370330 MAYSVILLE. CITY OF JONES COUNTY 08119/86(R) (NSFHA)
370101A MCADFNVILLE,TOWN OF GASTON COUNTY 06/0187(R) 06/0187(L)
370148# MCDOWELL COUNTY' MCDOWELL COUNTY 07/15/88(R) 02/05/97
370390# MEBANE, TOWN OF ALkMANCE COUNTY 11/0580(R) 11/0580
370158# MECKLENBURG COUNTY • MECKLENBURG 06/01181(R) 010/93
COUNTY
370418# MINNESOTT BEACH, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 09/2385(R) 08/0585
370161# MITCHELL COUNTY • MITCHELL COUNTY 09/04/86(R) 09/M/88(K
370236# MONROE, CITY OF UNION COUNTY 01/1983(R) 07/03/94
370336# MONTGOMERY COUNTY MONTGOMERY 02/2A/97(R) 06/01181
COUNTY
370164# MOORE COUNTY • MOORE COUNTY 12/15/89(8) 12/15189
370314# MOORESVILLE, TOWN OF IREDELL COUNTY 05/0180(R) 05101180
370048# MOREHEAD CITY, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 02/16/77(R) 10(1883
370035# MORGANTOMCITY OF BURKE COUNTY 02/1987(R) 02/19187
370242# MORRISVILLE, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 11/01n8(8) 12/05/96
3702160 MOUNT AIRY,TOWN OF SURRY COUNTY 12/01/81(R) 02/1987
370102# MOUNT HOLLY, CITY OF GASTON COUNTY 09R8n9(R) 09/28n9
370369# MOUNT OLIVE, TOWN OF WAYNE COUNTY 02/17/82(R) 02/17/82
370419# MURFREFSBORO,TOWN OF HERTFORD COUNTY 06/o1/87(R) 06/01/87(L)
370061E MURPHY. TOWN OF CHEROKEE COUNTY 07103196(R) 07/03/86(M)
375356# NAGS HEAD, CITY OF DARE COUNTY I I1I0/72(R) 03/06/96
370278# NASH COUNTY • NASH COUNTY o6t01n8(R) 01/20/82
370167# NASHVILLE, TOWN OF NASH COUNTY 01/17/86(8) 01/17186
3700740 NEW BERN, CITY OF CRAVEN COUNTY o6/01n8(R) 05/04/87
370168# NEW HANOVER COUNTY' NEW HANOVER 07/17ng(R) 09/03/92
COUNTY
370012# NEWLpND, TOWN OF AVERY COUNTY 12J04/84(R) 12/0444
370049# NEWPORT, TOWN OF CARTERET COUNTY 05115n8(R) 10/18183
370057# NEWTON. TOWN OF CATAWBA COUNTY 09/03/80(R) 09/03/80
370466# NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH, TOWN OF ONSLOW COUNTY 06/15/90(R) 03/06198
370257# NORTH WILKESBORO, TOWN OF WILKES COUNTY 02115n8(R) 02118/98
370173# NORTHAMPTON COUNTY' NORTHAMPTON 11/04/88(R) 11/04/88
COUNTY
370493 OAKBORO, TOWN OF STANLY COUNTY 07/09197
375357# OCEAN ISLE BEACH, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 11/17n2(R) 04Ant91
370149# OLD FORT, TOWN OF MCDOWELL COUNTY 07/15/88(R) 02/0597
3703400 ONSLOW COUNTY' ONSLOW COUNTY 07/M/87(R) 11/0492
3703420 ORANGE COUNTY • ORANGE COUNTY 03/1681(R) 03/16/81
3702790 ORIENTAL, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 12/04/85(R) 1240485
370349# ORRUM, TOWN OF ROBESON COUNTY 03/1197(R) 02/1793
3701080 OXFORD, CITY OF GRANVILLE COUNTY 09/2890(R) 09/2890
370181# PAMLICO COUNTY PAMLICO COUNTY 09M4/85(R) 09/04185
D;CLUDES THE TOWN OF MESIC
370016# PANTEGO. TOWN OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 08105185(R) 08105/85
Pagc 6 of 12 05/08/98

Al ,-S
Federal Emergency Management Agency
r
Federal Insurance Administration

CID Community Name
370184# PASQUOTANK COUNTY
370285# PEACHLAND,TOWN OF
370344# PENDER COUNTY'
370315# PERQUIMANS COUNTY
370346# PERSON COUNTY'
370429# PIKEVIL.LE, TOWN OF
370337# PINE BLUFF, TOWN OF
370267# PINE KNOLL SHORES, TOWN OF
370463# PINEHURST, VILLAGE OF
370091# PIN'ETOPS. TOWN OF
3701600 PINEVILLE, TOWN OF
370372# PITT COUNTY •
370249# PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF
370194# POLK COUNTY'
370142# POL.LOCKSVIL U- TOWN OF
370485 PRINCETON. TOWN OF
THE TOWN OF PRINCETON HAS ADOPTED JOHNSTON
COUNTY (370138) FIRM DATED 11-2-95 PANELS 0110,
0115.0140.
370318# PRINCEVILLE, TOWN OF
370132A RAEFORD, CITY OF
3702430 RALEIGH, CITY OF
3MI98A RAMSEUR. TOWN OF
370199A RANDLEMAN, CITY OF
3701950 RANDOL.PH COUNTY •
370324 RANLO, TOWN OF
370204# RED SPRINGS, TOWN OF
3702090 REIDSVILL_E, CITY OF
370041B RHODHISS, TOWN OF
370341A RICHLANDS, TOWN OF
3703480 RICHMOND COUNTY'
370432# RIVER BEND, TOWN OF
370117# ROANOKE RAPIDS, CITY OF
3701660 ROBBINS, TOWN OF
370106E ROBBINSVILLE, TOWN OF
370156A ROBERSONVILLE, TOWN OF
3702020 ROBESON COUNTY •
3703500 ROCKINGHAM COUNTY'
3702010 ROCKINGHAM. CITY OF
3702140 ROCKWELL, TOWN OF
3700920 ROCKY MOUNT, CITY OF
THE TOWN OF BATTLEBORO (370089), EDGECOMBE
COUNTY, WAS MERGED INTO THE CITY OF ROCKY
MOUNT EFFECTIVE 7-1.96.
THE TOWN OF BATTL.EBORO (370089). EDGECOMBE
COUNTY, WAS NIERGL-D INTO THE CITY OF ROCKY
MOUNT EFFECTIVE 7-1-96.
County
PASQUOTANK
COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
PENDER COUNTY
PERQUIMANS
COUNTY
PERSON COUNTY
WAYNECOUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
CARTERET COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY
PITT COUNTY
WASHINGTON
COUNTY
POL.K COUNTY
JONES COUNTY
JOHNSTON COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
HOKE COUNTY
WAKECOUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
RANDOLPH COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
ONSLOW COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
CRAVEN COUNTY
HALIFAX COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
GRAHAM COUNTY
MARTIN COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
ROCKINGHAM
COUNTY
RICHMOND COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
12/0485(R) 12104/85
07/01/87(R) 07/01/87(L)
02/15/85(R) 01/06/95
07/03/85(8) 07/0385
09/14/90(8) 09/14/90
02/14497(8) 04/01/82
07/17/86(R) 12/1589(M)
o9/2sn9(R) 07/03/95
03M/91(R) 12/15/89
03/28/80(R) 03/2880
03/18/87(R) 03/18187
01/0683(R) 09/14/90
08/19/85(R) 08119/85
01/01/87(R) 01/01/87(L)
09/04/96(R) 08/16/88(M)
02/14/97(R)
04/15/80(R) 04/1580
06/03/86(R)
08/15n8(R)
03/01/87(R)
07/01/87(R)
07/16/8 I (R)
12/19/89
05/01/87(R)
09/29n8(R)
06/03/86(M)
12/19/97
03/0187(L)
07/01B7(L)
07/1681
06/27n5
02/17/93
o9/29n8
07/0386(R)
07/03/86(R)
09MM9(R)
08/19/86(8)
04/17n8(R)
07/0386(R)
12/0189(R)
07/01/B7(R)
02/17/89(R)
05/15/91(R)
09/06/89(R)
ovnns(R)
woins(R)
07/03/86(M)
07/03/86(K
09/0689
08/1986
09/17/92
12/1589(M)
12/0189(L)
07/01B7(L)
02/17/93
05/15/91
09/0689
05/15ns
01!20/82
Pagc 7 of 12 05/08/98

Federal Emergency Management Agency
' Federal Insurance Administration

CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
370421# ROPER TOWN OF WASHINGTON 08/05/85(R) 08/05/85
COUNTY
FORMERLY UNDER WASHINGTON COUNTY
375358# ROSMAN, TOWN OF TRANSYLVANIA 06/02/72(R) 03/02198
COUNTY
370351# ROWAN COUNTY • ROWAN COUNTY 11/01/79(8) 11/Oln9
370347# ROXBORO, CITY OF PERSON COUNTY 03/25/91(R) 09/14190
370217# RUTHERFORD COUNTY' RUTHERFORD 0610187(R) 06101/87(L)
COUNTY
370219B RUTHERFORDTON, TOWN OF RUTHERFORD 06/17/86(R) 06117/86(M)
COUNTY
370215# SALISBURY, CITY OF ROWAN COUNTY 05/15/80(R) 05115180
3702200 SAMPSON COUNTY • SAMPSON COUNTY 07116191(8) 07/16/91
370143# SANFORD, CITY OF LEE COUNTY 09/06/89(8) 09/0689
370316# SCOTLAND COUNTY • SCOTLAND COUNTY 12/1688(R) 1211688
370118 SCOTLAND NECK, TOWN OF HALIFAX COUNTY 10/28/77(R) (NSFHA)
370481# SEVEN DEVILS, TOWN OF AVERY COUNTY 04/13/98(R) (NSFHA)
WATAUGA COUNTY
370392# SEVEN SPRINGS. TOWN OF WAYNE COUNTY 02/1782(R) 02/1782
370422A SEVERN, TOWN OF NORTHAMPTON 0210187(R) 02101/87(L)
COUNTY
370388# SHALLOTTE, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 01/0386(R) 01/03/86
370441 SHARPSBUG, TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 07/0380(R) (NSFHA)
COUNTY
NASH COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
370064# SHELBY, CITY OF CLEVELAND COUNTY 04/03/78(R) 1012381
370059B SI ER CTTY.TOWN OF CHATHAM COUNTY 07/02/87(R) 07/07/87(#)
370140# SMMIFIEID, TOWN OF JOHNSTON COUNTY 04/0182(R) 04/0182
3MI100 SNOW HILL TOWN OF GREENE COUNTY 01r2=2(R) 01/20/82
370338# SOUTHERN PINES, TOWN OF MOORE COUNTY 03/04/88(R) 12/1589
370430# SOUTHERN SHORES, TOWN OF DARE COUNTY 05/13/72(8) 04/02193
370028# SOUTHPORT. CITY OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 04/15m(R) 12/1885
370005B SPARTA. TOWN OF ALLEGHANY 07/0386(R) 07/0386(M)
COUNTY
370093# SPEED.TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 07/02/87(R) 07/02/87
COUNTY
3702160 SPENCER TOWN OF ROWAN COUNTY 09/29/78(R) 09/29/78
370356 SPINDALE, TOWN OF RUTHERFORD 06/04/79(8) (NSFHA)
COUNTY
370484 SPRING LAKE. TOWN OF CUMBERLAND 02/14/97(8)
COUNTY
THE TOWN OF SPRING LAKE HAS ADOPTED THE
CUMBERLAND COUNTY [370076] FIRM DATED 2-17-82
PANELS 00358, 00408.0075B, 0080B.
370163# SPRUCE PINE, TOWN OF MITCHELL- COUNTY 0910288(R) 09/02/88
370472# STALLINGS. TOWN OF UNION COUNTY 04/05194(R) 01/17197
USE THE UNION COUNTY [370234] FIRM
3703610 STANLY COUNTY • STANLY COUNTY 12101/81(8) 12/0181
370371A STANTONSBURG, TOWN OF WILSON COUNTY 0910189(R) 09/01B9(L)
3701350 STATESVLLLE. CITY OF IREDELL COUNTY 09/28/79(R) 09/28179
370362# STOKES COUNTY • STOKES COUNTY 0913088(R) 09/3088
370489# STOKESDAL-E. TOWN OF GUILFORD COUNTY 05/05/97(R)
THE TOWN OF STOKESDALE HAS ADOPTED THE
GUILFORD COUNTY (3701111 FIRM DATED 12.5-89
PANEL 001 OB, AND 0002.
370437# STONEWALL, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 1210485(R) 12/0485
Page 8 of 12
05/08/93

.+

i
A -,-10
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance /Administration
CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
(Ewer or Reg] Map
FORMERLY UNDER PAMLICO COUNTY
375359# SUNSET BEACH, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 11/17l12(R) 08/18192
370186# SURF CITY, TOWN OF PENDER COUNTY 05/02/77(R) 01/22198
3703640 SURRYCOUNTY • SURRY COUNTY 12/01/81(R) 09/15/89
370227# SWAIN COUNTY' SWAIN COUNTY 07/17/86(8) 12/15/89
370179# SWANSBORO, CITY OF ONSLOW COUNTY 10/18/83(R) 10/1883
3701370 SYLVA, TOWN OF JACKSON COUNTY 07/03/86(R) 12/15/90
370070B TABOR CITY, TOWN OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 07/17/86(R) 07/17/86(M)
3700940 TARBORO. TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 01/05!/8(8) 02/0488
COUNTY
370082# THOMASVI LE, CITY OF DAVIDSON COUNTY 09/28/79(R) 0604/90
370187# TOPSAIL BEACH, TOWN OF PENDER COUNTY 09/30!77(11) 01/21/98
3702300 TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY • TRANSYLVANIA O=ff= 03/02/98
COUNTY
370434# TRENT WOODS, TOWNSHIP OF CRAVEN COUNTY 05/04M7(R) 0510487
3701410 TRENTON. TOWNSHIP OF JONES COUNTY 09/01/87(R) 08/16/88(L)
370271A TRYON. TOWN OF POLK COUNTY 08/19/86(R) 08/19/86(K
370232# TYRRELL COUNTY • TYRRELL COUNTY OV1985(R) 08/1985
3702340 UNION COUNTY • UNION COUNTY 07118/83(8) 01/17/97
370298# - VALDESE, TOWN OF BURKE COUNTY 07/03/86(R) 07/03/86(M)
3703660 VANCE COUNTY VANCE COUNTY 1d22/97(R) 07/16/91
370075# VANCEBORO, TOWN OF CRAVEN COUNTY OV04/88(R) 08/04/88
3704380 VANDEMERE, TOWN OF PAMLICO COUNTY 12/04/85(R) 12/04/85
FORMERLY UNDER PAMLICO COUNTY
3700060 WADESBORO, TOWN OF ANSON COUNTY 09t19/96(R) 08119/86(M)
370368# WAKE COUNTY • WAKE COUNTY 11115r78(R) 12/1987
370244# WAKE FOREST, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 07/03/78(R) LVOV%
370094B WALLACE, TOWN OF DUPLIN COUNTY 04/0286(R) 04M=6(M)
3702248 WALNUT COVE, TOWN OF STOKES COUNTY 06/03/86(R) 06/03/86(M)
3704350 WALNUT CREEK, CITY OF WAYNE COUNTY 10/19/89(R) 09130/83
3703960 WARREN COUNTY' WARREN COUNTY 02/01/87(R) 02101187([
)
370247# WASHINGTON COUNTY' WASHINGTON 08/19/85(R) .
11/02/94
COUNTY
370268# WASHINGTON PARK, TOWN OF BEAUFORT COUNTY 11/22n6(R) 02/04/87
370017# WASHINGTON, CITY OF BEAUFORTCOUNTY 02/Mn7(R) 02/04/87
370251# WATAUGA COUNTY. • WATAUGA COUNTY 06/18/80(R) 01/17/97
370486 WATHA, TOWN OF PENDER COUNTY 02/14/97(R)
THE TOWN OF WATHA HAS ADOPTED PENDER
COUNTY 370344 FIRM DATED 1-6-95. PANEL 0065.
370254# WAYNE COUNTY' WAYNE COUNTY 09/16191(R) 03/16/98
37012411 WAYNES VILLE. TOWN OF HAYWOOD COUNTY 01/0683(R) 01/06/83
370269# WEAVERVILLE, TOWN OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY OSM6/97(R) 05/06/96
370119# WELDON, TOWN OF HALIFAX COUNTY 04/01/81(R) 04/01/91
370245# WENDEL.L, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 06101/78(R) 12105/96
3700090 WEST JEFFERSON, TOWN OF ASHE COUNTY 06/04M7(R) 08/16188(M)
370464# WHISPERING PINES, VILLAGE OF MOORE COUNTY 12/15189(R) 12115/89
370095# WHITAKERS, TOWN OF EDGECOMBE 04/15/80(R) 04115/80

370490#
WHITE LAKE, TOWN OF COUNTY
BLADEN COUNTY
05/08197(R)
THE TOWN OF WHITE LAKE HAS ADOPTED THE
BLADEN COUNTY FIRM (370293) DATED 9-1-89.
. 370071# WHITEVILLE CITY OF COLUMBUS COUNTY 07/01191(R) 01/17/97
370259# WILKESBORO. TOWN OF WILKES COUNTY 06/01/87(R) 02/03/93
3701570 WILLLAMSTON, TOWN OF MARTIN COUNTY 08/19/87(R) 09/20/96
37017I N WILMINGTON, CITY OF NEW HANOVER 04117r78(R) 11/03/87
COUNTY
Pap 9 of 12 05/08/98
•1,-I
Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal Insurance Administration

CID Community Name County Date Of Entry Current Effective
[Ewer or Reg] Map
3703704 WILSON COUNTY WILSON COUNTY 01/1283(R) 01/06/83
3702701 WILSON, CITY OF WILSON COUNTY 07/19/82(R) 07/1982
370019# WINDSOR, TOWN OF BERTIE COUNTY 07/ISl77(R) 0811985
370345# WINFALL- TOWN OF PERQUIMANS 11105/92(R) 07/0385
COUNTY
370365# WINGATE, TOWN OF UNION COUNTY 0211282(8) 07/05/94
37536011 WINSTON-SALEM, CITY OF FORSYTH COUNTY OB/31/73(R) 12/17/93
370193B WINTERVILLE, TOWN OF PITT COUNTY 02/24nB(R) 02124/78(4)
370424A WINTON, TOWN OF HERTFORD COUNTY 07/01187(R) 07/0187(L)
370380# WOODFIN, TOWN OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY 02/0180(R) 05/06196
370177# WOODLAND, TOWN OF NORTHAMPTON 03/0187(R) 03/0187(L)
COUNTY
375361# WRIGHTSVIILE BEACH, TOWN OF NEW HANOVER 11/06//0(R) 04/0286
COUNTY
370261# YANCEY COUNTY • YANCEY COUNTY 04/17/84(8) 04/1784
370030# YAUPON BEACH, TOWN OF BRUNSWICK COUNTY 02/16n7(R) 04/02/91
370494 YOUNGSVILLE, TOWN OF FRANKLIN COUNTY 06130/97 o9/15x/8
THE TOWN OF YOUNGSVILLE HAS ADOPTED THE
FRANKLIN COUNTY (370377) FHBM DATED 9-15-78.
370246# ZEBULON, TOWN OF WAKE COUNTY 07/03r18(R) 12/05/96
TOTAL IN FLOOD PROGRAM 395
TOTAL IN THE REGULAR PROGRAM 384
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM WITH NO SPECIAL FLOOD 5
HAZARD
TOTAL IN REGULAR PGM BUT MINIMALLY FLOOD 68
PRONE
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM 11
TOTAL IN EMERGENCY PROGRAM WITH HAZARD 6
IDENTIFIED
(R) - Indicates Entry in Regular Program
NSFHA - No Special Flood Hazard Area - All Zone C
> - Dare Of Current Effective Map is after the Date Of This Report
• - Unineorpottated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
Pagc 10 of 12 05/08/98
1-1
f

1
A_-12
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Federal Insurance Administration
Areas Which Have Had Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified
--Not In The Program—
CID Community Name County Hurd Area
Identified
"NORTH CAROLINA
370004# ALLEGHANY COUNTY
370407# ARLINGTON, TOWN OF
370394# BOLIVIA, TOWN OF
370461# CAMERON, TOWN OF
370408# CASAR TOWN OF
370300# CASWELL COUNTY
370455# CHERRYVILLE TOWN OF
370409# COFIELD, VILLAGE OF
3703590 EAST LAURINBURG, TOWN OF
370225# ELKIN, TOWN OF
370352# FAITH, TOWN OF
375350A FRANKLIN. TOWN OF
370451# GAMEWELL, TOWN OF
370413# GASTON, TOWN OF
370431# HAYESVILLE, TOWN OF
3701230 HAZELWOOD, TOWN OF
370129 HENDERSON COUNTY •
3704050 HIGH SHOALS, CITY OF
3703260 HOOKERTON, TOWN OF
370319# KERNERSVILLE, TOWN OF
370384 LAUREL PARK, TOWN OF
370303 LAWNDALE, TOWN OF
370459# LUMBER BRIDGE TOWN OF
3701500 MACON COUNTY •
370309 MOCKSVILLE, TOWN OF
370454# PARKTON, TOWN OF
3704200 PITI'SBORO, TOWN OF
370286# POLKTON, TOWN OF
370468# ROLES VILLE, TOWN OF
370258E RONDA, TOWN OF
370355# RUTH, TOWN OF
370423A SIMS, TOWN OF
370406A SPENCER MOUNTAIN, TOWN OF
370109# STEW/, TOWN OF
370360 WAGRAM, TOWN OF
370281A WEBSTER, TOWN OF
370256# WILKES COUNTY •
370400# YADKIN COUNTY •
ALLEGHANY
COUNTY
YADKIN COUNTY
BRUNSWICK COUNTY
MOORE COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
CASWELL COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
HERTFORD COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
CALDWELL COUNTY
NORTHAMPTON
COUNTY
CLAY COUNTY
HAYWOOD COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
LINCOLN COUNTY
GREENE COUNTY
FORSYTH COUNTY
HENDERSON COUNTY
CLEVELAND COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
MACON COUNTY
DAVIE COUNTY
ROBESON COUNTY
CHATHAM COUNTY
ANSON COUNTY
WAKECOUNTY
WIT COUNTY'
RUTHERFORD
COUNTY
WILSON COUNTY
GASTON COUNTY
GRANVIL E COUNTY
SCOTLAND COUNTY
JACKSON COUNTY
WILKES COUNTY
YADKINCOUNTY
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM EMERGENCY PROGRAM 2
TOTAL SUSPENDED FROM REGULAR PROGRAM 5
TOTAL WITHDRAWN COMMUNITIES NOT IN 0
PROGRAM
Pap 11 of 12
07/01177
O1/19n9
06/10/77
1v1589(F)
11/17ns
02/03n8
07/15/98(F)
03/0780
1v16/88(F)
08/15n8(F)
o7/03n8(F)
08/13n6(F)
09/16/89(F)
1v15n8
07121/91
01/0683(F)
03/01/92(F)
12/OV80(F)
01/20/82(F)
05127/77
06/11176
07/11175
Ov1789(F)
06/30/78
07/11175
02/17/89(F)
imon8
Ov10n8
03/03/92(F)
07/03/96(F)
04/01/77
01/12n9
07/14ns
o912smm
09108n5
0v1on8
05/15/91(F)
05/15/91(F)
Date On Which
Sanctions Apply
owoin8
01/1980
06/10/78
12/15/90
11/17179
02/03/79
07/1589
03/07/91
om in6
os/Isns(s)
10117n6
07/o3ns(s)
08/16/99
07/04/9s(S)
07/21/92
01/18/94(S)
03/01/82(S)
11/03n9
09126176
o5/27n8
06111177
own 1176
02/17/90
06/30/79
o7nln6
02/17/90
10/20/19
OvIM9
03/03/93
07/03/86(5)
o4/olns
01/12/80
07/14n9
09/78/91
08/08/76
ovlon9
06/04/87(S)
05losn9
,n:
05
Federal Emergency Management Agency
.?'
Federal Insurance Administration
CID Community Name County Hazard Area Date On Which
Identified Sanctions Apply
TOTAL NOT D; PROGRAM WITH HAZARD AREA 31
IDENTIFIED
TOTAL NOT IN PGM WITH HAZARD AREA > 1 YEAR 31
N/A - Not Applicable At This Time
(S) - Suspended Community
(W) - Withdrawn Community
(F) - Effective Map Is A Flood Insurance Rate Map
• - Unincorporated Areas Only
All Other Code Or Symbols Are Explained On Page 2 Of This Book
°•' . _ of 12
05/08/98

1

ENT or
N O
X
-? e
MACH 'eh

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636.3726
July 31, 1998
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 2761
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
+ 1^ Z
This responds to your letter of June 26, 1998, requesting information from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) for the purpose of evaluating the potential environmental impacts of a
proposal to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope
Mills Bypass, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina (TIP No. U-3311). This report
provides scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves as initial
scoping comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their permitting and/or
certification processes for this project.
In the original start of study letter dated March 26, 1998 the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) proposed the widening of Bingham Drive to a multi-lane curb and
gutter facility from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3328 (Marykirk Road), and the construction of
a multi-lane facility, on new location, from Marykirk Road to Raeford Road at the SR 1141
(Bunce Road) intersection.
An alternative to the new location portion (Alternative 1) of this project is now being studied
under the subject project. This alternative (Alternative 2) proposes to widen Bingham Drive to a
multi-lane curb and gutter facility from Marykirk Road to US 401 along the existing alignment.
Symmetrical widening, asymmetrical widening, or a combination of the two will be studied in
order to reduce impacts to existing developments and the environment. Approximately 27.4
meters (90 feet) of right-of-way will be required for the proposed improvements.
The mission of the Service is to provide leadership in the conservation. protection, and
enhancement of fish and wildlife, and their habitats, for the continUMU benefit of all people. Due
to staffing limitations, we are unable to provide you with site-specific comments at this time.
However, the following recommendations are provided to assist yoti your planning process and
to facilitate a thorough and timely review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practical as outlined in Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act Amendments
of 1977. In regard to avoidance and minimization of impacts, we recommend that proposed
highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways, utility corridors, or previously
developed areas in order to minimize habitat fragmentation and encroachment. Areas exhibiting
high biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and region should be avoided.
Crossings of streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings and/or occur
on a structure wherever feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert structures that maintain
natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and wildlife passage,
should be employed. Highway shoulder and median widths should be reduced through wetland
areas. Roadway embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion
control devices and techniques. Wherever appropriate, construction in sensitive areas should
occur outside fish spawning and migratory bird nesting seasons.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map of the Fayetteville 7.5 Minute Quadrangle does not
show any significant wetlands within the project area, except for an existing crossing of a tributary
to Beaver Creek. However, while the NWI maps are useful for providing an overview of a given
area, they should not be relied upon in lieu of a detailed wetland delineation by trained personnel
using an acceptable wetland classification methodology.
We reserve the right to review any federal permits that may be required for this project, at the
public notice stage. We may have no objection, provide recommendations for modification of the
project, or recommend denial. Therefore, it is important that resource agency coordination occur
early in the planning process in order to resolve any conflicts that may arise and minimize delays
in project implementation.
In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the environmental documentation for this
project include the following in sufficient detail to facilitate a thorough review of the action:
A clearly defined purpose and need for the proposed project, including a discussion to the
projects's independent utility,
2. A description of the proposed action with an analysis of all alternatives being considered,
including the upgrading of existing roads and a "no action" alternative,
A description of the fish and wildlife resources, and their habitats, within the project
impact area that may be directly or indirectly affected,
2
A'-i6
The extent and acrea`,e of waters ofthe U.S., including, wetlands, that are to be impacted
by filling, dred;ing, clearin`, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetland boundaries should be determined by using
the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps),
The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and permanent, that would be
likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed project. The assessment should also
include the extent to which the proposed project would result in secondary impacts to
natural resources, and how this and similar projects contribute to cumulative adverse
effects;
6. Design features and construction techniques which would be employed to avoid or
minimize the fragmentation or direct loss of wildlife habitat value;
7. Design features, construction techniques, or any other mitigation measures which would
be employed at wetland crossings and stream channel relocations to avoid or
minimize impacts to waters of the United States; and,
8. If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend that every effort be made to
identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance. Project planning should include a
detailed compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland impacts.
Opportunities to protect mitigation areas in perpetuity, preferably via conservation
easement, should be explored at the outset.
The attached pages identify the federally-listed endangered, threatened, and candidate species tha:
are known to occur in Cumberland County. Habitat requirements for the federally-listed species
in the project area should be compared with the available habitat at the project site. If suitable
habitat is present within the action area of the project, field surveys for the listed species should be
performed. Environmental documentation should include survey methodologies and results. In
addition to this guidance, the following information should be included in the document regarding
protected species:
A map and description of the specific area used in the analysis of direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts;
2. A description of the biology and status of the listed species and the habitat of the species
that may be affected by the action, including the results of any onsite inspections;
An analysis of the "effects of the action" on the listed species and associated habitat
which includes consideration of

Tile environmental baseline ?\'. i h is an analysis of the etYects of past and on_oinl.z
human and natural factors leadin,! to the current status of the species and its
habitat,
The impacts of past and present federal, state, and private activities in the project
area and cumulative impacts area;
C. The direct and indirect impacts of the proposed action. Indirect effects are thosd
that are caused by the proposed action and are later in time, but are still
reasonably certain to occur;
d. The impacts of interrelated actions (those that are part of a larger action and
depend on the larger action for their justification) and interdependent actions
(those that have no independent utility apart from the action under consideration);
and,
The cumulative impacts of future state and private activities (not requiring federal
agency involvement) that will be considered as part of future Section 7
consultation;
4. A description of the manner in which the action may affect any listed species or
associated habitat including project proposals to reduce/eliminate adverse effects. Direct
mortality, injury, harassment, the loss of habitat, and/or the degradation of habitat are all
ways in which listed species, may be adversely affected;
A summary of evaluation criteria to be used as a measure of potential effects. Criteria
may include post-project population size, long-term population viability, habitat quality,
and/or habitat quantity; and,
6. Based on evaluation criteria, a determination of whether the project is not likely to
adversely affect or may affect threatened and endangered species.
Candidate species are those plant and animal species for which the Service has sufficient
information on their biological status and threats to their survival to propose them as endangered
or threatened under the ESA. Although candidate species receive no statutory protection under
the ESA, federal agencies are required to informally confer with the Service on actions likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of these species or that may destroy or modify proposed
critical habitat.
Federal species of concern (FSC) include those species for which the Service does not have
enough scientific information to support a listing proposal or species which do not warrant listing
at the present time. These species receive no statutory protection under the ESA, but could
become candidates in the future if additional scientific information becomes available indicating
4
A3-18
that they are endangered or threatened. Formal listing places the species under the full protection
of the ESA, and necessitates a new surve\• if its status in the project area is unknown. Therefore,
it would be prudent for the NCDOT to avoid any adverse impacts to candidate species or their
habitat. The North Carolina Natural HeritaLe Program should be contacted for information on
species under state protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise'
us during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact
Tom McCartney at 919-856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely,
JV"171P
for John M. Hefner
v? Ecological Services Supervisor
Enclosures
cc:
COE, Wilmington, NC (Scott McLendon)
NCDOT, Raleigh, NC (Craig Young)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (Cyndi Bell)
WRC, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
FHWA, Nicholas Graf, Raleigh, NC
EPA, Ted Bisterfield, Atlanta, GA
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:07/31/98:919/856-4520 extension 32:\U-33 I Ltip
Accounts of Selected Federally Listed Species In CUMBERLAND County
Data represented on these maps are not based on comprehensive inventories
of this county. Lack of data must not be construed to mean that listed
species are not present.
35'15'
35'
Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
based on data provided by NC Natural Heritage Program
T ' l D. Newcomb, K. Tripp 1115/98
0 1 2 4 5 MILES
I
0 1 2 3 4 5 KILOMETERS
expires 1131!99
79' 78'45' 78'31
Mapping Symbols for
Threatened and Endangered Species

N

Biros
\ Bald Eacie
Peregrine Falcon
Q Piping Plover
Red-cockaded Woodpecker
Roseate Tern
Wood Stork
Fish
O Cape Fear Shiner
Waccamaw Silverside
Mussels
Dwarf-wedge Mussel
Tar Sp inymusse 1
Mammals
_ Eastern Cougar
Red Wolf
Plants
American Chaffseec
Harperella
Michaux's Sumac
Pondberry
Rough-leaved Loosestrife
Schweinitz's Sunflower
-: _,Seabeach Amaranth
4,-,Sensitive Joint-vetch
Small Whorled Pogonia
AL Smooth Coneflower
Seaturtles are seasonally ubiquitous along coastal regions,
and therefore, are not labeled. Shortnosed Sturgeon and Manatees
are seasonally ubiquitous in estuarine areas and are also not labeled.

-? ` DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
?Ullk'
? WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 2802-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENT1pN OF
September 16, 1998
Planning Services Section
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
R E C?
In sfA o
ti?C > l998
AL
This is in response to letters from your office dated March 26 and June 26, 1998,
requesting our comments on 'TIP Project No. U-3311, widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass, Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, Federal Aid No. STP-1141(7), State Project No. 8.2442901"
(Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199801418).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources, which
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
4
Sincerely,
-; C. Alex Morrison
Chief, Technical Services Division
Enclosure

September 16, 1998
Page 1 of 1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
'TIP Project No. U-3311, widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road)
to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, Federal Aid No.
STP-1141(7), State Project No. 8.2442901" (Regulatory Division Action 1. D. No.
199801418)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Mr. Bobby L. Willis, Planning Services Section, at
[phone]
The proposed project is located in Cumberiand County, which participates in the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Based on a review of Panel 155 of the February 1982
Cumberland County Flood Insurance Rate Map, the southern terminus of the roadway appears
to be in the flood plain of Beaver Creek, and both Alternatives 1 and 2 cross Beaver Creek
Tributary A. These streams are detailed study streams with 100-year flood elevations
determined and Foodways defined. We refer you to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's "Procedures for'No Rise' Certification for Proposed Developments in Regulatory
Floodways," copies of which have been provided previously to your office. The project should
be designed to meet the requirements of the NFIP and be in compliance with all local
ordinances.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at
[phone]
Based on information provided in the North Carolina Department of Transportation Star, of
Study letters dated March 26 and June 26, 1998, the project may impact wetlands. More
information is needed on the extent, location, and community type of all the impacted wetlands
before an environmental assessment can be made. Upgrading an existing facility generally
results in less impact than new location highways and is thus encouraged.
Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material
in waters of the United States or any adjacent wetlands in conjunction with this project,
including disposal of construction debris. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands
should first be avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensatory mitigation for
unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of any
work in wetlands, our Regulatory Division would appreciate the opportunity to review these
plans for project-specific determinations of DA permit requirements.
If you have any questions on permit requirements, they should be addressed to Mr.
Timpy.
,%'-23
?DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
\ PC BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1990
INt?LY REFE- 70 December S, 1999
Regulatory Division
Subject: Action ID No. 19980141S and TIP Project U-3311, State Project No. 8.2442901.
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager `
Planning Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference your letter dated August 18, 1999 regarding the proposal by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to widen Bingham Drive (SR 1141) from US 401
Business to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
This letter is to confirm the project team concurrence with Alternative one as the selected
alternative for the proposed project. This concurrence was provided at the project team meeting
held on July 15, 1999. The selected alternative proposes to widen Bingham Drive from Fisher
Road north to Mary Kirk Drive, then proceed on new location for approximately 0.7 miles to the
intersection of US 401 Business with Bunce Road, as shown on the attached figure. This
alternative includes bridging an unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek, located on the new location
portion of the proposed alignment.
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
??V ?
E. David Franklin
Acting Chief, Regulatory Division
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. David Cox
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR-DWQ
Wetlands Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
Wetlands Section, Region IV
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
A'-'-.;

1 mile 0.5 mile 0 1 mile
? I I I

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
10,* PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
IBRANCH
HOPE MILLS BYPASS
FROM SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
TO SR 1363 (ELK ROAD)
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-620
FIG t
am' Nciuiu;
'Ji\'ISI'J;l Oi I_cn,: ReSOU;:.O?
Jc es B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretor}'
Chorles H. Gardner, P.G., P.E.
Director and State Geologist
PROJECT REVIEW ML`fENN.rS
Project Number. - T/ aLpal.! County u(y_bJ lamed
Project Name: NI (jQl'4 C0 IU I yw+ 115 ?GI -h7l 0a222sed `Ya f L('/(
p-k s5.
NC Office of State Planning - Geodetic Su:-vev
_ This project will ir.,pact• geodetic survey markers. N.C.
--? Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.C.
"Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional
destruction of a geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General
Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the N.C. Office of state
planning, Geodetic Survey Office at 919/733-3836.
Reis er Date
Lrosion end Sedimentation Control"'
NIo comment
This project will recuire atprc-.,al of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbi.^.g activity if
more than ene (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is re-uired'to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) recuirements, the document must be sutmitted as
part of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
% If any porticn of the pre'ect is located within a High-Quality
Water Zone (cQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental
Management, increased desicn standards for s=diment and erosion
control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentaticn control plan.recuired for this
project should be prepared by the Department of Tranz:ortation
under the erosion control c_cgra-m delegation to the Division of
Fig^:rays from the ___clina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)
cr r.c:e contacc t.= Section z= 51?/733-4574-
???' GtJa.?o? 5L - 9 - 5'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 16, 1998
RCDENR
To: Melba McGee, DENR SEPA Coordinator
From: Mary Kiesau, DWQ SEPA Coordinator 01
Subject: Comments on DOT Scoping #98-0626; DWQ 3 12032
SR 1141 Widening from us 401 to the proposed Hope Mills
Bypass; Cumberland County
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) requests that the following topics be
discussed in the EA/EIS document:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The current stream
classifications and use support ratings for these streams should be included. This
information is available from DWQ through the following contacts:
Liz Kovasckitz - Classifications - 919-733-5083, ext. 572
Carol Metz - Use Support Ratings - 919-733-5083, ext. 562
B . Identify the linear feet of stream channelization/relocation. If the original stream
banks were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DWQ requests that these catch basins
be placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible parry for
maintenance.
E. Identify the storrnwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion control measures are not placed in
wetlands.
G . Wetland Impacts
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional
wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat losses.
V) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Emplcyer 50 recycled/ 10°o post-consumer paper
Wetland Scopine
April 16, 1998
Page 2
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating
jurisdictional wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat losses.
v) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
vi) Quality of wetlands impacted.
vii) Total wetland impacts.
viii) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from DWQ.
DWQ is also concerned about secondary wetland impacts. For DWQ to concur
with an alternative in the mountains or the piedmont, DOT will need to commit to full
control of access to the wetland parcels or DOT to purchase these parcels for wetland
mitigation.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be required for this
project. Applications requesting coverage under our General Certification 14 or General
Permit 31 (with wetland impact) will require written concurrence. Please be aware that
401 Certification may be denied if wetland or water impacts have not been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Please call Cyndi Bell at [phone] if you have any questions regarding these
comments.
mek:\SR 1141 Scoping
cc: Cyndi Bell - DWQ - ESB, Ecological Assessment Group
A',-n-()
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Re%lewin• Office
LNTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW- PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: Y?Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR permit(s) andor approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Ollicc indicated on the reverse of the form.
applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process Time
(statutory time limit)
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
O Permit to construct 6s operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions A sewer systems contracts. On-site inspection. Pat-application technical conference usual

not discharging into state surface waters .

(90'days)
O NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or
i Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection, Pre-application 90-120 days
perm
t to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct wastewater
discharging into state surface waters treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of (N/A)
plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is laser.
O Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(N/A)
O Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
installation of a well. (15 days)
O Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner. 55 days
On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require
Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredge (90 days)
and Fill Permit.
O Permit to construct aF operate Air Pollution Abatement N/A
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC

(2Q.0100, 2Q.0300, 2H.0600) 60 days
Any open bunting associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D.1900
M Demolition or renovations of structures containing

asbestos material must be in compliance with 15 A 60 days
NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification and
removal prior to demolition Contact Asbestos Control N/A
Group 919-733-0820.
90 d
(
ays)
O Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
213.0800

` The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be property addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion A
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed Plan filed with proper Regional Office (land Quality 20 d

Sect) At least 30 days before beginning activity. A fee of S30 for the first acre and 52000 for each additional acre or part must
h avs
(30 days)
accompany t
e plan.
O The Sedimentation Pollution control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance
. (30 days)
O Mining Permit On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with ENR Bond amount vari
es
with type mine and number of acres of afrected land Any are mined greater
30 davs
Uran one acre must be permitted The appropriate bond must be received (60 days)
before the permit can be issued-
• North Carolina Bunting permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4 days 1 day
(N/A)
O Special Ground Clearance Bunting Permit - 22
i
i
l N On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than I der
y
count
es
n coasta
.C. with organic soils five acres of ground clearing activities are involved,
Inspections should be (N/A)
requested at least ten davs before actual burn is planned"
O Oil Refining Facilities N/A
90.120 days
(Ni A)
• Dam Safety Permit If permit required application 60 days before begin construction
A
licant
.
pp
must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans. inspect constructiorL
cerify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require 30 days
prmut un&r mosquito control program And a 404 permit from Corps of
Enrmeer: An insoection ofshe is necesi.•v to verif%- Hazard •-
mrrumum fee o(SZGU"must accompany the application. An adunsonaI
prnceaing fee ht ed or. a percentage or the total profeet cost µtll he required
I urvm comnlelunn

Continued on revene
Normal Process Time
(statutory time limit)
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
O Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety bond of 55.000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that 10 davs
any well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged (N/A)
according to ENR rules and regulations.
O Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 dats
Application by letter. No standard application form (N/A)
O Stare Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on stricture size is charged Must include descriptions $ 15-20 days
drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property. (N/A)
O 401 Water Quality Certification N/A
60 days
(130 days)
O CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 5250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)

O
CAMA Permit for MINOR development -77
550.00 fee must accompany application
22 days
(25 days)
O Several geodetic monuments arc located in or near the project ama. If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh NC 27611
O Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
O Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation
O Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required

45 days
T
(N/A)
' Other comments (anach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority)
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
O Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
O Fayetteville Regional Office
Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
O Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
O Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
919) 946-6481
O Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, INC 27609
(919) 5711700
O Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405
[phone]
O Wiruton-Salem Regional Office
5R5 Wauz4:own S:
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 771--600
n,-,l
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

A
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Project Revi w Coordinator
RE: 98-0626 Widening From US 401
Bypass, Cumberland County
DATE: April 24, 1998
to Hope Mills
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has
reviewed the proposed project. The attached comments are a
result of this review. More specific comments will be
provided during the environmental review process.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. If during the
preparation of the environmental document, additional
information is needed, the applicant is encouraged to notify
our respective divisions.
attachments
R P'1. I"` 1 1
`Ei r- •1?-- D
APR Z 7 1998
f,1; STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
PC) Box 27Ga7. PALEIG" NC 27611 7An7 512 N-TM SALISBVnY S'PCC'. P•_EI?N NC 27604
P.131,E 71•J 73J 4')q.: FAX 919 715,]oro www L-11 S-E EHNR
A _ -Al r I ? A,I n..a vI A- -C.
4? 1 D
North Carolina
Department of Administration
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Katie G. D6-r etA','5ecretary
May 4, 1998
Mr. Richard Davis
N.C. Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
Transportation Building
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Davis:
Re: SCH File # 98-E-4220-0626; ScopinQ Proposed Widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US
401 (Raeford Rd.) to the Proposed Hope Mills Bypass in Fayettteville; TIP TMU-3311
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
N. C. State Clearinghouse
Attachments
cc: Region M
1 16 West Jones Street Raleigh. `c-'`, CaroIir, 27603-8003 Telephone 919--3" -?32
An Lyuwl V;:Cnr-nab A::.nc..n%c Acuau L'npluvGr

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources

James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray IZ p iir, r ten 9 8
Division of Archives and Historv
kffrey J. Crow, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook
???
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
SUBJECT: Widen SR 1141 from US 401 to Hope
Mills Bypass, Cumberland County, U-
3311 , Federal Aid Project STP-1141 (7),
State Project 8.2442901, 98-E-4220-
0626
We have received information concerning the above project from the State
Clearinghouse.
We have conducted a search of our files and are aware of no structures of
historical or architectural importance located within the planning area. Therefore,
we recommend that no historic architectural survey be conducted for this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:7State cc: Clearinghouse
N. Graf
B. Church

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission P.
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coor ' for
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 23, 1998
SUBJECT: Request for information from the N. C. Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife concerns for SR 1141 (Bingham
Drive) widening, from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills
Bypass, Cumberland County, North Carolina, TIP No. U-3311, SCH
Protect No. 98-E-0626.
'Chis memorandum responds to a request from Mr. H. Franklin Vick of the
NCDOT for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from
the subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) have reviewed the proposed improvements, and our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
At this time the NCWRC has no specific recommendations or concerns regarding
the subject project. However, to help facilitate document preparation and the review
process, our general informational needs are outlined below:
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area,
including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered,
or special concern species. Potential borrow areas to be used for project
construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated
plant species can be developed through consultation with:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
Memn
2 Acril 2?. 1998
And,
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. 0, Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams crossed and the extent of
such activities.
Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the project.
Wetland acreages should include all project-related areas that may undergo
hydrologic change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or filling for
project construction. Wetland identification may be accomplished through
coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the COE
is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and
criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the
proposed project. Potential borrow sites should be included.
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or
fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the environmental
effects of highway construction and quantifies the contribution of this
individual project to environmental degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result
from secondary development facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal,
or private development projects, a description of these projects should be
included in the environmental document, and all project sponsors should
be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for
this project. If we can further assist your office, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Howard Hall, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
,N,-6
r
K
North Carolina
Department of Administration

James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Tiq rsett, Secretar%,
August 10, 1998
j .
;:.
C°
v V,'RGG
Mr. William Gilmore
N.C. Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
Transportation Building
Raleigh, NC 27601
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Re: SCH File # 99-E-4220-0034; Scoping Proposed Widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US
401 (Raeford Rd.) to the Proposed Hope Mills Bypass in Fayetteville; TIP #U-3311
The above referenced project has been reviewed through the State Clearinghouse Intergovernmental
Review Process. Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies reviewing this document.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone]-
S* erely,
Mrs. Chrys Baggett, Director
N. C. State Clearinghouse
V
Attachments
cc: Region M
1 16 Wcst Jone: Street Ralei_h. North Carolina 27603-S003 Telephone [phone]
'\:: I ...1111.. •., III IIII II'. ... ::'I Jll.l' .\l':..,I 1...:',•I.I\
NCR' -i CAROLINA DEFAR--ENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATcR CONSERVATION
,IT =-WA

NCDENR
MEMORANDUM Jule : s. 1995
JAMES B. Hu NT JR.
GOV[RNOR TO: Melba McGee
+ FROM: David Harrisoi;?

z -
WAVWZ MCDCVr" "'- SUBJECT: Bingham Drive (SR 1141) Improvements, Cumberland County.
,E McTAwr -'gyp=,. .
.?,...., ? , i; ?.: ";
Project No. 99-E-0034.

> The proposed improvements include widing the existing road from SR

onescioie -? ,' 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road) with an alternative for relocating
r^=y :•,?: the section between SR 3328 (Marykirk Road) and Raeford Road.

.r?

The Environmental Assessment should include information on the amount
and location of Prime or Important Farmland that will be impacted. Alternatives
that reduce impacts to Prime or Important Farmland soils are preferred. A listing
of these soils in North Carolina is available through the NERA Team Leader,
North Carolina State Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA,
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205, Raleigh, N.C. 27609, [phone].
The Prime Farmland designation is not limited to land currently being
cultivated. It is intended to identify the best soils that can be used as farmland
without regard to the present vegetative cover. Only areas that are already built-
up or within city limits are exempted from consideration.
DHhI
EC i 'NA"c Y
U-1 6117 aA-E1:- NOP t.. '_J1P()l. •.I ??
"l ?J :_ F.\ , - 1 - -a lA: '•iN
P.. -•,f 711. 7
NORTH CAR OLIN ;.';ATE CI.E-ARINGH0 SE
DEPAR'T'MENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
STATE NUMBER: 99-E-4220-0034 F02
DATE RECEIVED: 07/08/1998
AGENCY RESPONSE: 07/29/1998 GC,C.?L ????
• REVIEW CLOSED: 08/03/1998
Ms. Renee Gled^i11-zarlev
Clearinghouse Coordinator
Dept. of Cultural Resources
Archives-Histcry Bldg.
?r
Raleigh NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Dept. of Agriculture _
Dept. of Crime Cont./ Public Safety
Dept. of Cultural Resources b?,lr
Dept. of Environment & Natural Res 1n SC??'
Mid-Carolina COG _A`^
,Y v" 1
PROJECT INFORMATION 06 E D I
APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation p„?41? ' ?G ??
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act kr
Iu 1
ERD: Scoping
OESC: Proposed Widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Rd.) to the
Proposed Hope Mills Bypass in Fayetteville; TIP #U-3311
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date. If additional review time is needed, please contact this office
at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
?- NO COMMENT
COMMENTS ATTACHED
S: CNED B`!: Auu $ 1998
DF.TE. V3?1?
J;1L 1 ? :??9
JU'%- 2 0 1996
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
NCDENR

JAMES B. HUNTJR.
GOVERNOR
MEMORANDUM
71
TO: Chrys Baggett
WAYNE McDEvtrr State Clearinghouse
SECRETARY FROM: }•? - ?C
Melba McGee
Environmental Review Coordinator
RE: 99-0034 Scoping Hope Hills Bypass, Cumberland
County
DATE: August 6, 1998
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has
reviewed the proposed information. The attached comments are
for the applicant's information and consideratioin.
Thank you for the opportunity to review.
attachments

Al, E .?Nn•. •. tip". .. r w.n i[ .a __.?., Eun__ Ci, Sn"? wCrvr ?: t'.'1'. r .._ ur.. r_i r.
Stitt of 'North Carolina
r
Department of Em ironmcnt and Natural Rcsourcc.r ;:.,e.nng C;'.:: - ?J:Z?,•-mot:.;. ILC
J
LNiTERGOVER NIE`'TAL RE%'IE%%' - PROJECT COMMENTS Proiect dumber. C d ? Due D.:
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR permit(s) and or approvals indicated may nerd to be obtained m order for this preicct to
comply with !north Carolina Law. Questions regarding these pennits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the fonts.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are availabic from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process Time
'
t
t
l
(s
a
e tart'
time
imit)
PER.!%(rrS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQC.'IR.E.% ENTS
O Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer systems contracts. On-site inspection. Post-application technical conference usual.
not discharging into state surface waters. (90 days)
O NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. Pre-application 90-1.0 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct wasterwatc
discharging into state surface waters, trnvmtent facility-gamed after NPDES. Reply tiom 30 days after tencipt of (N/A)
plans or issue of NPDES permit-whichever is later.
O Witter Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 davs
(N/A)
O Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
installation ofa well. (15 days)
O Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner. SS days
On-site inspection. Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require
Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredge (90 days)
and Fill Permit.
O Permit to con uuct & operate.4ir Pollution Abatement N/A
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC 60 days
(2Q.0100, 2Q.0300, 2H.0600)
My open bunting associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 213.1900
O Demolition or renovations of structures containing 60 days
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15 A
NCAC 2D.11 10 (a) (1) which requires notification and
removal prior to danolition Contact Asbestos Control N/A
Group 919-733-0820. (90 days)
O Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
2D.0800
O The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more awes to be disturbed Plan filed with proper Regional Office (land Quality 20 days
Sea.) At least 30 days before beginning activity. A fee of S30 for the first awe and 52000 for each additional awe or part must (30 days)
accompany the plan
O The Sedimentation Pollution control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance. (30 days)
O Mining Permit On-site in9mmon usual. Surety bond filed with ENR Bond amount varies
with type mine and number of awes of affected land Any are mined greater 30 days
than one awe must be permitted The appropriate bond must be received (60 days)
before the permit can be issued
O North Carolina Burung permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources ifpermtnt exceeds 4 davs 1 day
(N/A)
O Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than 1 day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils five acres of ground clearing activities are involved Inspections should be (\; A)
requested at least ten days before actual bum is planned"
O Oil Refining Facilities N/A I 90.120 davs
(N, A)
O Dam Safety Permit Upermit required application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant
must him N.C. qualified engineer to prepare plans, inspect construction,
cenify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require 30 days
permit under mosouito control program. And a 404 penmut from Corps of
Engineer. An inspection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classtftcauon. A (60 da}s)
minimum fee of S.CU C0 must accomranv the appii:auon. An additional
prnccssinz t:- rra?cd on a percentage cr the total croiect cos,, will be rruuire:!
ur*m comnict on I !
s
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM // July 31, 1998
FROM: Bennett Wynne A'
Habitat Conservation Program
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
SUBJECT: Scoping request for information to be used in preparing an Environmental
Assessment (EA) for TIP Project No. U-3311, widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass, Fayetteville,
Cumberland County, North Carolina. Project Number: 99-E-0034.
This memo is a standard scoping response that we hope will be useful in preparation of the
EA. Although some of the information requests and comments may not be applicable to certain
projects, these guidelines should facilitate preparation of fisheries and wildlife impact assessments.
Our ability to evaluate project impacts and provide beneficial recommendations when reviewing
environmental documents will be enhanced if consultants, project sponsors, or permit applicants
provide the following information.
1. Complete descriptions of wildlife, fisheries, and wetland resources within, adjacent to,
or utiliang the proposed project construction area including a listing of species designated
as federally or state endangered, threatened, or special concern. When practicable,
potential borrow areas to be used for project construction and discharge areas should be
included in the inventories. A listing of designated species can be developed through
consultation with:
N.C. Natural Heritage Program
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
(919) 733-779-5
Faveno-ville DOT Scopuio
and.
N.C.D.A. Plant Conservation Program
P.O. Box 27647
Raleigh. N.C. 27611
[phone]

2. Project map identifying wetland acreage impacted by the project. Wetland acreage
should include all project related areas that may undergo hydrologic change as a result of
ditching, other drainage, or filling for project construction. Wetland identification may be
accomplished through coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the
COE is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria
listed.
3. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams and the extent of such activities should be
noted. Any water withdrawals from groundwater or surface water sources should also be
well described. In addition, wetland acreage impacted by alternative project designs
should be provided. Finally, for projects involving the discharge of wastewater, potential
impacts to streams and wetlands should be thoroughly described, whether wastes are
directly discharged to surface waters or land applied. Adequate buffers should be
maintained between all land application areas and wetlands or streams.
4. Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities.
5. The extent of wildlife habitat fragmentation in uplands and wetlands and impacts
associated with fragmentation.
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for direct and indirect habitat loss
and degradation in quantitative terms.
7. A discussion of the cumulative impacts of secondary development facilitated by the
proposed facility improvements. Such discussion should weigh the economic benefits of
the project against the costs of associated environmental degradation.
8. If environmental documents are required, a list of preparers and respective areas of
expertise, including professional qualifications, should be included.
Measures to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources, including wetlands, should
be implemented throughout facility planning and construction. Where impacts to wetlands are
unavoidable, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission will recommend mitigation for the losses.
Professional wildlife and fisheries biologists should be consulted if aquatic. wetland. or terrestrial
habitats are affected by this type of development.
,\ '
Fayettcn-illo DOT Scopia,,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment during the early planning stages of this project.
If you have questions regarding these comments, please call me at (919) 5??-9736.

NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR. `-
GOVERNOR
-'WAYNE MCDEVIIT -
C. D[Nici'SoTTS ?.'
DtRCC?o
I,

-77
r
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
FROM: David Harrisc,E ??>"':z
July 14, 1998
SUBJECT: Bingham Drive (SR 1141) Improvements, Cumberland County.
Project No. 99-E-0034.
The proposed improvements include widing the existing road from SR
1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road) with an alternative for relocating
the section between SR 3328 (Marykirk Road) and Raeford Road.
The Environmental Assessment should include information on the amount
and location of Prime or Important Farmland that will be impacted. Alternatives
that reduce impacts to Prime or Important Farmland soils are preferred. A listing
of these soils in North Carolina is available through the MLRA Team Leader,
North Carolina State Office, Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA,
4405 Bland Road, Suite 205, Raleigh, N.C. 27609, [phone].
The Prime Farmland designation is not limited to land currently being
cultivated. It is intended to identify the best soils that can be used as farmland
without regard to the present vegetative cover. Only areas that are already built-
up or within city limits are exempted from consideration.
DH/tl
P O Box 27697 (: a-CI ; NORTH C.:PC.-iNA 2"6 I 76V-
P-134C')1'i-733-2302 FAN 919 "i7'i ?!"
AP. C'_.. AL 0 P1.O P T U N I TV AFFI PUA TI VL A?TIO.1 Cw PLO VEP - So'. PC_.._C 7'I0*. PC - T 0 P1:11-1C0 PAP[P
SOIL & WATER
?rASEavAIIC'•

^ L? i. 1
`;,,e; ?. N,y•,, , i?., Gc??r??o' ? tom- t? p
Chcries H. P.C-., F.E.
Direc or ens S ct' Geoloeis',
?y? PF.OJ/E?CT(F?°%':= CC:CL,,
I6 0 County: L U f be-4
project Number: 11
N ells ?(
()S Ol -AD
Yi?
Project Name:
NC office of state Plannine - Geodetic Su^•e7
This project will impact ceodetic survey r..a>?1.C.
Geodetic Survey should be contacted prior to construction at F.O.
(719) 7jj-3336 . ;tenticnal
"tc:: 27ES7, Raleich, N.C. - -
destruction of a geodetic monu-.ant is a violation o- N.C. General
Statute 102-4.

L
This project will have r.c i7,=act cn ceodetic survey markers.
other (comments attache)
ticn cc-tact t - t:.C. C"ice of State
Fcr more ?
Planning, Geodetic `ur•ey Office at
-7
Date
zeviswer r-rosion and Se_inentation Ccctiol"
r:o cc--e-t
This project wi11 re^:ire a_-r_:a'_ cf an erosion and sod -e,tafi_..
-trcl p1 prior to hr=; n'__ any land-dish=- _ a- `-'
cc.. an - - -
more than cne (1) acre will be d_scurbed.
_ ^ 1 1 docu=ent -' s recsired*to 6atis Env
If an envi r. enema - -? "=
..e dcccmer.t ,' st :e _ ._..._tt=? as
policy P.ct (S.-Fr) recuirer..a nos,
part cf the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
` t^e pr--',z:" a F--• Quality
Water ./Zone?(c2„), as class--red the Divisicn c_ _-._rcr_menzal
sased dc- s_a =cr..s F.• e_
F=nacame
control will a: ply.
T^e eros_ cr. and sed_mer.r_t_cn c_n _rc_ plan re .sired fcr this
?
,, -
=t s`.culd be precar= 1- i '.-e Department cf Tran-=cr..afrom.
upr'nd)- -tr- - r :-- ra-- deleaaticn tc t C'_visicr. cf
er the eresicr. cc. - - 17 n? C -entati--Ccntr=i Ccrnm;esic^,
__ ..rays from t n
G_ner (=nMen:S

r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April 16, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee, DENR SEPA Coordinator
From: Mary Kiesau, DWQ SEPA Coordinator VIP
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) requests that the following topics be
discussed in the EA/EIS document:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project. The current stream
classifications and use support ratings for these streams should be included. This
information is available from DWQ through the following contacts:
Liz Kovascldtz - Classifications - 919-733-5083, ext. 572
Carol Metz - Use Support Ratings - 919-733-5083, ext. 562
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelization/relocation. If the original stream
banks were vegetated, it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks be
revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DWQ requests that these catch basins
be placed at all water supply stream crossings. Identify the responsible parry for
maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary) to be employed.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion control measures are not placed in
wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating jurisdictional
wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat losses.
V) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-353 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Act cn Emcicyer 50°b recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
VL'edand Scocin
April 10, 199S
Paae 2
i) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and delineating
jurisdictional wetlands.
ii) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
iii) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
iv) Mitigation measures to compensate for habitat losses. »
v) Wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
vi) Quality of wetlands impacted.
vii) Total wetland impacts.
viii) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested from DWQ.
DWQ is also concerned about secondary wetland impacts. For DWQ to concur
with an alternative in the mountains or the piedmont, DOT will need to commit to full
control of access to the wetland parcels or DOT to purchase these parcels for wetland
mitigation.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may be required for this
project. Applications requesting coverage under our General Certification 14 or.General
Permit 31 (with wetland impact) will require written concurrence. Please be aware that
401 Certification may be denied if wetland or water impacts have not been avoided and
minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Please call Cyndi Bell at [phone] if you have any questions regarding these
comments.
mek:\SR 1141 Scoping
cc: Cyndi Bell - DWQ - ESB, Ecological Assessment Group
A ,-41
lk
May 8, 1998
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E. Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
199
I am responding to you letter regarding the Bingham Drive project, TIP. No. U-3311,
which will widen Bingham Drive from Raeford Road to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass.
We do not have any comments regarding permits or envirnomental impacts. However, I
do recommend that sidewalks be reviewed as part of the project.
Currently, Bingham Drive is outside the corporate, limits of Fayetteville. We are currently
updating our annexation plan and I feel it is a good possibility that much of Bingham
Drive will be within the city limits by the construction time period of 2003.
Please look at the cost factor involved with sidewalks on both sides of the street and the
alternative of having them on only one side. I'm sure the Fayetteville City Council will
be interested in participating with DOT on construction of sidewalks for Bingham Drive.
If you havc any questions, pease let call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
JJimmy Teal
Assistant City Manager

3_.
`r?
a !'? r ?e
ROBERT N. STANGER COUNTY of C LAT IB ERLAND
Carr E.%comu
Office of the County Engineer
May 19, 1998
Mr. Craig Young, Planning Project Engineer
Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201
RE: Bingham Drive (SR 1141), Portion within the Unincorporated Area of Cumberland County
Project No. U-3311
Dear Mr. Young:
TIMOTHY S. SIMPSON
AsstsTANr CouNTY E?Gt',mt
In reference to your letter requesting information pertaining to any required permits and approvais for the above
referenced project, I have reviewed this area and determined that Floodplain Development Permits and review by Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be required. This project crosses Beaver Creek at Fisher Road end
as well as Beaver Creek Tributary A at the North end of the project area which places portions of this project within the
100 year special flood hazard area as shown on the attached map. This map was derived from the Flood Boundary and
Floodway Maps for the unincorporated areas of Cumberland County dated February 17, 1982 and the Cumberland
County Tax Mapping Department's digitized parcel maps. In order to construct or improve within the special flood
hazard areas, a Floodplain Development Permit would be required before any grading or construction can begin. The
FloodpWr Development Permits for the unincorporated areas of Cumberland County are to be obtained through the
Cumberland County Engineering Department at the address below.
A small portion of this project area also falls within the City of Fayetteville jurisdiction. I suggest you contact the City
of Fayetteville for further review of this project.
For the portion of the project area within the 100 year floodplain of Beaver Creek and Beaver Creek Tributary A, a review
by FEMA is also required for possible Letters of Map Amendments and/or Revisions (LOMA/LOMR) and requirement
of a No Rise Certification for encroachments within the floodways of said creeks.
Wetlands protection is a federal regulation administered by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The Wilmington District
has jurisdiction over Cumberland County. I suggest you contact Mr. Alan Davis at [phone] for review of this
project area.
Should you require additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely.
4??Z? /? ./0 16t
Robert N Stanaer, P.E.
Countv Engineer
Enclosure
\3-`0
PO. Boo 1S=') - Fa,.e!,- .d1e. ,Vor.,i: Carolina - 9/0; 6"i-7h?6 - Feu ''i? ?,- -_n71

F-AYETTEVILLE CITY
-ff
fir''; ?;?• ?1. ...(?j
BCA.VE'R • CREEK
TRIBUTARY
" f y
40
I /I " 1M \ >fl
? 1\ ? 111 I
PR[,JECTi AREA
•'?, ?A ??J I w
fI I ! ?? )
j ,
'AS
! ?1\. BEAVER ..CREEK
•,,,..???^? ?'`\, /1 I I III ; '. i I ; ?-." ?3 ?_?`,
Aj ell
??.?
BEAVER CREEK
TRIBUTARY B
r? n a
? ? 1 (.. l7 ., ,v r
US V% FIAMWAN , 0
L.EGENU" ( \'? :, l 4 nl? o ?: i
.. no va nIIalAa 1 ?\ •1•- .
w rm nasaAur f "
FttUirVAV
-- ----------
w rA M2111111'"
? • ion r`
Z-,
u L?
3u
P1 .
l,l
i ca
wA
.- .
zCkf
Q -?
A F-
M
ON
u?
W J
F- a
A ?
U
0
w -"
Q II
yI ' 1
1--
L)
L.,J
L7
(L'
> z
? j
7
Q l t..l
Q3
L-D7 R
1`-1 LA
CJ
LL.
n
(Y_
(1.
f--
z
h- 5
Z ?-
? LY_
UlJ
qn
J Q U
W
W
_ ::D 1-i
U 0
LI

A A
r%i
PLANNING &
INTERNAL 1- DMORANTDUM
TO: Cram l"ou112. P.E.
Project PlanninL'
FROM: Tom Pad,_,ett. Archaeolo`\ Super%isor
Environmental Unit J l
SUBJECT: Archaeological Input Request. TIP No. U-33 11. Cumberland
County
DATE: June 16, 1998

CC: D. B. Foster, P.E.
The checked items below concern the status of your project input request:
This project is currently scheduled for completion to meet your requested due date.
If any complications arise the project archaeologist will contact you. The
archaeologist assigned to this project is:
Due to current workload. it is unlikely that this project will be completed by your
requested due date.
Please reevaluate your timetable or have the Branch Manager or Assistant Manager
assign a priority to this project.
Currently. we estimate completion by
We are holding your project request until we receive SHPO scoping comments.
Please forward when available.
The following information was not included in your project input request. Please
provide:
* X This project has been cleared by the SHPO for Section 106 compliance in regard
to ARCHAEOLOGY. No further input from the Archaeology Section is
required. If you need a copy of the compliance documentation, please see me.
is * SHPO had no comments on this project. This should be documented in your Scoping
Meeting Minutes.

A=-:,
APPENDIX 4
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
Citizens Informational
Workshop
OF tNORTH C
A? ?O
?? ly
co
rn_
Q
Q
OF TRAN5e0
Fayetteville
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to
US 401 (Raeford Road),
L Cumberland County
TIP Project U-3311
July 7, 1998

CITIZENS INFOR. IATIONAL %WORKSHOP
FAYETTEVILLE
`VIDENING OF SR 1141 (BINGHkNI DRIVE) FROM
SR 1107 (FISHER ROAD) TO US 401 (RAEFORD ROAD)
TIP PROJECT U-3311
July 7, 1998
PURPOSE OF THE CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP
The purpose of the citizens informational workshop is to involve the public in the
project planning process. If you have comments or suggestions about the proposed
improvements described in this handout, please let a representative of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation know. A comment sheet is provided for you to write down
your questions or concerns so that we can keep a record of and fully consider your ideas,
comments, and suggestions.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation realizes individuals living close
to a proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the project on their
homes and businesses. However, exact information is not available at this stage of the
planning process. Additional design work is necessary before the actual right of way
limits can be established. More detailed information will be available at a later date.
Written comments on this project may be left with North Carolina Department of
Transportation representatives at the citizens informational workshop or submitted
throueh the mail. If additional information is needed or you would like to submit
comments after the citizens informational workshop, please address your requests and
comments to:
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Persons who sign the workshop attendance sheet or submit comments during or
after the workshop will be added to the project's mailing list and will be notified of future
workshops or hearings.
A4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportations 1998-2004 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) proposes to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane
facility from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road) in Cumberland County.
The project will cover a distance of 43 km (2.7 miles). The project area is shown on the
' attached map (Figure 1).
The purpose of this project is to alleviate congestion and improve safety alone
Bingham Drive. Current traffic estimates for Alternative 1 (see "Proposed
Improvements" section below) show up to approximately 13,620 vehicles per day on
Bingham Drive within the project limits, while estimates for Alternative 2 show up to
17,220 vehicles per day. This is expected to increase to 22,200 vehicles per day
(Alternative 1) and 25,800 vehicles per day (Alternative 2) by the design year (2020).
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST
The Environmental Assessment for the project is scheduled to be completed in
May of 1999. A public hearing is anticipated in the summer of 1999. Right of way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in October of 2002, and construction is scheduled to
begin in October of 2003. The schedules for right of way acquisition and construction, as
well as preliminary cost estimates, are summarized below:
PROJECT SCHEDULES AND ESTIMATED COSTS
Project Stage TIP Schedule Current Cost
Right of Way Acquisition October 2002 $ 2,800,000
Construction October 2003 $ 7,950,000
Total Project Cost S 10,750,000
*Note: These estimates are preliminary and subject to change as
further planning and design studies are completed.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
%., ' Typical Sections
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from SR 1107 (Fisher
Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road) in Cumberland County. NCDOT is currently
evaluating two typical sections for this project: a four-lane median divided section
M-3
and a five-lane undivided section. The fou:-lane median divided section would
consist of two pavements with curb and gutter (each measuring 7.8 m. or 26 feet.
between the curb faces) divided by a 4.8 meter (16 foot) grassed median (see
Figure 2). The five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section would measure 19.2
m (64 feet) between the curb faces with a 3.6 meter (12 foot) continious middle
turn lane (see Figure 3). These typical sections would require a proposed right of
way width of 24.4 m to 30 m (80 to 100 feet). A combination of these two typical
sections is proposed for this project in order to reduce overall residential and
commercial property impacts and environmental impacts, while at the same time
increasing the traffic carrying capacity of the facility. East side, west side, and
symmetrical widening, as well as a combination of these, will be evaluated.
Alternatives Being Considered
Alternative 1: From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), existing
Bingham Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, median divided section. From SR
3697 (Bibar Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be
widened to a 5-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section. From Crestwood Avenue
to SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive), Bingham Drive would be widened to a 4-lane,
divided section with a grassed median. From Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a 4-
lane, divided section with a grassed median would be constructed on new location
to connect Bingham Drive with US 401 at Bunce Road.
Alternative 2: From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), existing
Bingham Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, median divided section. From SR
3697 (Bibar Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be
widened to a 5-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section. Alternative 2 is identical
to Alternative 1 for the section of Bingham Drive from Fisher Road to Crestwood
Avenue. From Crestwood Avenue to SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive), both a 5-lane,
undivided section and a 4-lane, median divided section are being studied. From
Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a 5-lane, undivided section would be constructed
along existing Bingham Drive. The need for improvements to US 401, from the
US 401 / Bingham Drive intersection to the US 401 / Bunce Road intersection,
will also be evaluated under this alternative.
ANTICIPATED RIGHT OF WAY IMPACTS
The existing right of way width along the project varies from approximately 18.3
m to 24.4 m (60 to 80 feet ). The project will require approximately 24.4 m to 27.4 m (80
c. ?
feet to 90 feet) of right of way along the existing alignment and 27.4 m to 30.5 m (90 feet
to 100 feet) on new location and will likely require the relocation of residences and
businesses along the project. Additional construction easements may also be required in
certain locations. A study corridor of approximately 153 m (500 feet) is currently being
studied for the proposed new location portion of Alternative 1 in order to evaluate and
minimize impacts to both the human and natural environment. Until both environmental
Aa-4
studies and preliminary design are completed, specific right of w'av impacts to individual
properties cannot be determined. As planning for the project continues. we will inciud:
all comments and suggestions received at this workshop and afterwards to the extent
possible. Anticipated impacts to individual properties will be presented at the pubiic
hearing, which is expected to be held in the summer of 1999.

/,
d

ENVIRONMENTAL AND DESIGN STUDIES
In the coming months NCDOT environmental specialists and survey crews will be
studying the project area. During this period, these NCDOT personnel may be on
citizens' properties in order to complete their studies. The purpose of these studies is to
gather background information that will be used in deciding on the most appropriate way
to improve Bingham Drive. No decisions on the final design of this project have been
made.
For additional information concerning this project, please contact Mr. Craig
Young, Project Planning Engineer, at [phone] extension 243 or by e-mail at
[e-mail].
A toll-free number is also available for general information regarding the North
Carolina Department of Transportation. The toll-free number for our Customer Service
Office is 1-877-DOT4-YOU. Citizens can call this number and speak with one of eight
customer service specialists available between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday though
Friday. These specialists will try to provide immediate responses to all questions. If
additional information is needed, questions will be directed to the proper office within the
Department, and a response will be given to each citizen within two days of the inquiry.
A4-5
Protect Planning En_ineer: Yount
Comment Sheet
Proposed Improvements SR 1 141 (Bingham Drive)
from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road)
Fayetteville, Cumberland County
Tip Project U-3311
IL
Name:
Address:
City _
Phone:
Date
(please print)
(please print)
_ State Zip
(optional)
Comments, concerns and/or questions regarding this project:
(If you need additional space, please continue on the back)
To help improve our public involvement process, we would appreciate your responses to
the questions on the following page.
A4-6
Project Plannin_ Engineer: Young
The folloNvinb questions relate to today's workshop:
Was the project adequately explained to you? Yes_ No
Were NCDOT representatives understandable and clear in their explanations? Yes No
Please explain
Were NCDOT representatives courteous and helpful? Yes No
\ Please explain
.
Were display maps and handouts easy to read and understand? Yes_ No
Please explain
How might we better present proposed projects and address citizens' concerns in future
informational workshops?
How did you hear about this meeting today?
Do you feel this meeting was adequately publicized? Yes No
Please explain
Do you have any additional comments or suggestions regarding our public involvement process?
Please leave your comments with NCDOT representatives at the workshop or mail them to:
Mr. William Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
A4-7
LaKt'? :,c ^ l w?oe?=? ?. ` _ 1? =s
16,1116 A N'
py,
Ft00? ii(5? ,
Coca, C,eck
Lrrnr
g
SR 1411 (BUNCE ROAD)
BEGN PROJECT ,, .?
T-r
t.• _t T ALTERNNATIVE'_
° 22 (WIDEN EXISTTNG)
r ,o? ' , x:42' 1: T3 o-i i-•s ? .7 .c ?.
ALTERNATIVE 1 15? 2a "? s 'K
(NEW LOCATION) -•' .M a '•;
/?3 3? ?_?-?ia'.2 8 ??? E3?'V •6 ?? _.?3 g'?„r _'a"'9 .nom ~$?y`` r
'0 3252 0?' ? g ° . -? 1f? ? c ?'"' ? A? - !" - °+ ?' • `.
''T.7 3 r2 1 _N • o \ ` iZII L' / - i- 2 ? • ' Es '?' -
3ti • .Z."..2 r 1
i ' ., :I23 3 n\ - or 1g ?': Tim 1 o i ^
22!1
mss. •?\ .»? ? ? ° '` '
Z22 M2,
L:2 i'g 1 " T` ' t d \ ?! ar i1!' Iu x.r'. • ' :-. r,= . ao f n r' - o
J c T o• ( 3 2 .I2" F q
77,
L ^f ?i SR 1141 (BINGHANI DRIVE)'
'it
- NOI:1'll C AI:OI.I\:\ \I(I \If.N l
01: *1 I:.\NS11OK 1.\ I'ION
pl\'1?10? Of 111( 1I11'.\1'`
ell
LNVIIt(1\\II.NI \1
BRANCII
v - FAYE77EVILLE
END I'ROIEC-I' SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE.)
1' I I FROM US ;01 (RAEFORD ROAM
- - - TO PROPOSED HOPE MILLS BYPASS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
- _ ^- TIP PRCJECT U-2311
FIGURE 1

J
lo
C
v
m
c ?
O
U ?
m L'
C.D
co .c
0
O 3
U
_ m
v
U )
a o
m
v
J
Q'
O
3
z
a
i
a 3 I
J
Y Ci
3
v -
G'?
ti
L ?
C
O
O ?
?
O l,i
O
o'+
w
O
Z
- c-:?j
m
v
U
o N
? O
m Z
0
a li

r
4

i
i
i.
! i

M

O
Q
T i

U L7 _
J C .7
Y
3
N '-
L

? O C
C j
H O
}
o co
a
o
o a
0
a
r
1
?

w 0
Z
N
C
O
N
U TT N
mm
W V
,

LO
O

U m
C
_
p J w
N
U I
• Y^ J
?
T

N
w
O
O
t ?
O 6s?f
Y
v
3
m
N
m
u o
C

A4-10
a ° O
Z

NORTH CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
Project Development
Environmental Analysis Branch
o?IA°RT'll?
o0
V 0
Fayetteville
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from
SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to
US 401 (Raeford Road),
Cumberland County
TIP Project U-3311
July 15, 1999
Project Development Engineer: Craig ?'oung
[phone] extension 229
cyoung a mail.dot.state.nc.us
Purpose and Agenda for Todav's iMeetim-,
The purpose of this meeting is to present both alternatives of the proposed project
to the resource agencies, allow them the opportunity to review the alternatives, and then
solicit any comments from the agencies on the proposed project and recommended
alternative.
I. Project purpose and Need
II. Project Description
III. Existing Conditions
IV. General Planning Information
A. Thoroughfare Plan
B. Feasibility Study
V. Proposed Improvements
VI. Alternatives Being Considered
A. Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)
B. Alternative 2
C. Alternative 3
VII. Project Schedule
VIII. Public Involvement Comments
A. Workshop Comments
B. Local Officials' Comments
IX. Comments
I. Project Purpose and Need
This project will relieve congestion resulting from growth along the southern
portion of Bingham Drive and west of this corridor. This project will also reduce the
accident potential along Bingham Drive. Together with TIP Project U-620 (Hope Mills
Bypass) and TIP Project U-3424 (Bunce Road), Bingham Drive will become a crucial
part of an envisioned north-south arterial between Cliffdale Road (SR 1400), just east of
its interchange with the Fayetteville Outer Loop, and US 301/1-95 Business.
The proposed project is one element of a system-wide thoroughfare plan that
provides circumferential travel between suburban growth areas and is consistent with
local land use plans. In conjunction with Bunce Road to the north and the proposed Hope
Mills Bypass to the south. Bingham Drive will provide a southwestern looping facility
that allows developing areas direct access to I-95 Business and Fort Bragg. By
connecting existing radial facilities (Cumberland Road, Camden Road. Legion Road, US
401 Business, and I-95 Business), this project, in conjunction with TIP Project U-3424
and TIP Project U-620, will reduce the need for circuitous travel in southwestern
Cumberland County.
II. Project Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation's 1998-2004 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) proposes to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane
facility from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401 (Raeford Road) in Cumberland County.
The project will cover a distance of 4.3 km (2.7 miles). The project area is shown on the
attached map (Figure 1).
III. EaistinQ Conditions
The project begins at US 401 (Raeford Road) and proceeds south along SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) towards the town of Hope Mills. The current right-of-way width varies
from 60 to 80 feet within the project limits. From US 401 to SR 3697 (Bibar Road),
Bingham Drive is a 24 foot, two-lane, Grass shoulder section. The posted speed limit
through this section is 35 mph. From SR 3697 (Bihar Road) to SR 3673 (Pepperbush
Drive), Bingham Drive transitions from a 24 foot, two-lane, grass shoulder section to a
34 foot, three-lane, grass shoulder section. The posted speed limit varies from 35 mph to
45 mph in this section. From SR 3673 (Pepperbush Drive) to the south project terminal
at SR 1107 (Fisher Road). Bingham Drive is a 34 foot, three lane, grass shoulder section
with a posted speed limit of 45 mph.
The section of Bingham Drive from US 401 (Raeford Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar
Road) is predominantly residential, with several subdivisions branching off of Bingham
Drive. A privacy fence parallels the east side of Bingham Drive approximately 6-m (20-
foot) from the edge of the existing pavement from approximately 244-m (800-foot) north
of SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue) to SR 1321 (Greenock Avenue). The remainder of the
project is mainly residential; however. houses are spaced much further apart and are set
farther off the road than in the previous section, and there are no subdiN isions connecting
to Bingham Drive.
IV. General Planning Information
A. Thoroughfare Plan
The Fayetteville Thoroughfare Plan, adopted in 1995, recommends
widening Bingham Drive to a-lane curb and gutter facility from US 401
(Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass. Bingham Drive is classified
as a Major Thoroughfare with land use along it being virtually all residential. The
proposed-lane section would help relieve congestion by the creation of a turning
lane and by providing 2 through travel lanes in each direction. The subject
project will be part of the envisioned north-south arterial between Cliffdale Road
(SR 1400) and US 301 / I-95 Business.
B. Feasibility Study
The 1996 NCDOT Feasibility Study recommends the construction of a
five-lane, 64-foot (face to face of curbs), roadway within 90 feet of right of way
from SR 1107 (Fisher-Road) to SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive), a distance of 3.3 km
(2.1 miles). North of SR 3328, it is recommended to relocate Bingham Drive on
new location to intersect US 401 (Raeford Road) at SR 1411 (Bunce Road), a
distance of 1.0 km (0.6 mile). This new location section was recommended to be
a five lane curb and gutter section, 64 feet wide from face-to-face of curbs on 100
feet of right of way.
V. Proposed Improvements
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to widen
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to US 401
(Raeford Road) in Cumberland County. NCDOT is currently evaluating two typical
sections for this project: a four-lane median divided section and a five-lane undivided
section. The four-lane median divided section would consist of two pavements with curb
and gutter (each measuring 7.8 m, or 26 feet, between the curb faces) divided by a 4.8
meter (16 foot) grassed median (see Figure 2). The five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter
section would measure 19.2 m (64 feet) between the curb faces with a 3.6 meter (12 foot)
continious middle turn lane (see Figure 3). These typical sections would require a
proposed right of way width of 24.4 m to 30 m (80 to 100 feet). A combination of these
two typical sections is proposed for this project in order to reduce overall residential and
commercial property impacts and environmental impacts, while at the same time
increasing the traffic carrying capacity of the facility. East side, west side, and
symmetrical widening, as well as a combination of these, will be evaluated.
VI. Alternatives Beinz Considered
At the beginning of the current planning studies, the thoroughfare plan alignment
(Alternative 1) was the only alignment being studied. A 500-foot study corridor was
surveyed by NCDOT staff biologists and existing wetlands were delineated using the
Global Positioning System. In discussions with FHWA, it was decided that additional
alternatives needed to be studied due to anticipated wetland impacts. Widening along
existing Bingham Drive (Alternative 2) and realigning Bunce Road north of US 401
Business (Alternative 3) were both added to the list of studied alternatives.
A. Alternative I (Preferred Alternative)
From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), existing Bingham
Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, median divided section. From SR 3697
(Bibar Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be widened
to a 5-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section. From Crestwood Avenue to SR
3328 (Mary Kirk Drive), Bingham Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, divided
section with a grassed median. From Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a 4-lane,
divided section with a grassed median would be constructed on new location to
connect Bingham Drive with US 401 at Bunce Road. Wetlands associated with
the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek will be bridged under this alternative.
B. Alternative 2
From SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3697 (Bibar Road), existing Bingham
Drive would be widened to a 4-lane, median divided section. From SR 3697
(Bibar Road) to SR 1340 (Crestwood Avenue), Bingham Drive would be widened
to a 5-lane, undivided, curb and gutter section. Alternative 2 is identical to
Alternative 1 for the section of Bingham Drive from Fisher Road to Crestwood
Avenue. From Crestwood Avenue to SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive), both a 5-lane,
undivided section and a 4-lane, median divided section are being studied. From
Mary Kirk Drive to US 401, a 5-lane, undivided section would be constructed
along existing Bingham Drive. The need for improvements to US 401, from the
US 401 / Bingham Drive intersection to the US 401 / Bunce Road intersection,
will also be evaluated under this alternative.
C. Alternative 3
Alternative 3 is similar to Alternative 2 in that it proposes to widen Bingham
Drive along existing alignment from Fisher Road to US 401 Business. From the
intersection at US 401 Business northward, a facility on new location would be
constructed that would tie into existing Bunce Road. This alternative would
basically result in the realignment of Bunce Road. Environmental field studies
conducted for this alternative concluded that extreme impacts to existing wetlands
and streams would result if this alternative were built. After reviewing the
proposed project area north of US 401 Business, it was determined that the only
feasible location for the new location of this alternative would either involve
unreasonable impacts to existing residences or to existing wetlands. For this
reason this alternative was dropped from further study.
VII. Project Schedule
The Environmental Assessment for the project is scheduled to be completed in
November of 1999. A public hearing is anticipated in early 2000. Right of way
acquisition is scheduled to begin in October of 2002, and construction is scheduled to
begin in May of 2004. The schedules for right of way acquisition and construction, as
well as preliminary cost estimates, are summarized below:
VIII. Public Involvement Comments
A. Iorkshop Comments
A Citizen's Informational Workshop was held July 7, 1998. Approximately
25 persons attended the meeting and expressed their concerns for the project.
Most of the questions concerned impacts to individual properties. The comments
received from those attending unanimously supported Alternative 1. Reasons
given in support of this alternative ranged from reduced traffic flow in the vicinity
of the elementary school located along Bingham Drive to providing better north-
south connectivity for southwestern Cumberland County. Attendees also stated
that Alternative 1 would avoid impacts to existing residences located along
Bingham Drive between Mary Kirk Road and US 401 Business. In addition,
Cumberland County Schools support Alternative 1 stating, "...we are in
agreement that Alternative 1 is the best solution to traffic congestion in front of
Brentwood Elementary School that is located on Bingham Drive."
B. Local Officials' Comments
The Cumberland County Joint Planning Board has submitted a written
response to NCDOT in support of their preferred alternative, Alternative 1 (see
attached letter).
IX. Comments
6 159 a
CA 0
COUNTY o CUMBERLA
Dr. Marion 01 ion Cumberland County Joint Planning Board DonO'Donniley,AICP
Chair
Plannine Director
July 29, 1998
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611
Dear Mr. Gilmore,
As secretary to the Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO), and Senior
Transportation Planner for the Cumberland County Joint Planning Board (the Lead Planning
Agency), I would like to take this opportunity to comment on TIP Project U-3311 (Bingham
Drive), currently under study by your office.
During the July 7, 1998 citizen informational workshop, the project outlined two alternatives at its
northern terminus:
Alternative 1- follo,,ving a proposed realignment of Bingham Drive as sho'AM on the
currently adopted Thorou-Qhfare Plan (four-lane divided cross section)
• Alternative 2 - proposing the «-idening of the existing Bingham Drive (five-lane curb and
gutter cross section)
A preliminary analysis of the proposed alternatives indicates that Alternative 1 is the preferred
alignment, due to the following:
1. The realignment will provide for a cross intersection with Raeford Road (US 401) and Bunce
Road (SR 1410/1411), avoiding a "dog-leg" intersection, increasing safety and providing for a
better traffic flow than Alternative 2 would. It xNU also require one signal light intersection,
as opposed to two signalized intersections in close proximity if Alt. 2 is chosen.
2. This alignment will become part of a direct route within a proposed northwest-southeast
corridor that will link Cliffdale Road, Raeford Road, Cumberland Road, Camden Road,
Legion Road and Us Hwy 301.11-95 Business (all major thoroughfares), upon completion of
the Bunce Road (U-3424) and Hope Mills Bypass (U-620) projects.
1.,'0 G;lleap;,• Stret•t Post O"lee Box IS:O F{retter;lle. \'ortr. Carohna :S30'-1 ti_) (910) 6",?-"600 Fa.r- IQ10) 67S-7611
L'( AIRERL I A?' - Fulcon - t oj,J in - Hop, i.'d!s - Lind, - Spnnr Luke - Srt dman • ('O(' \ i 1
3. Alternative 1 will remove traffic from the highly congested Brentwood Elementary School
area. providing for a safer road environment for young school children.
4. It will increase the traffic carrying capacity of Bingham Drive, provide a better LOS and safer
travel, due to the proposed four-lane divided cross section (Alternative 2 calls for a five-lane
cross section, which lends itself to a higher accident rate and congestion, by provided
uncontrolled movement).
5. It would reduce overall right-of-way impact and avoid property damage along the existing
Bingham Drive, reducing the cost of ROW acquisition (undeveloped vs. developed land).
Preliminary reviews show that Alternative 1 will impact approximately 0.37 acres of wetlands.
Although no estimates are currently available, Alternative 2 crosses a Beaver Creek tributary
in proximity of Arran Lake. We can safely assume that Alternative 2 will also impact
wetlands.
Alternative 1 will effect six to ten properties. The major property owner being impacted by
this alternative, was advised of the upcoming project and agreed to ROW protection along the
corridor prior to development of his tract of land (a used car sales lot). Over forty property
owners would be impacted if Alternative 2 is selected, the majority of which own single family
residences alonEz Bingham Drive.
I hope this information will help you establish the need to select Alternative I as the project.
Should you require additional information, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
i Tic r' A dc-Clele?anner III
Cumberland County Joint Planning Board
i l:na en ).
??? F t
' w3ae l
in
Spr ake" ?10-
oC +M'1a R_aL A N
Dyettevill;
1. "'"
I{oDe Mil S ?
Cedar Creek 1a ?•? *-ft ?
IS Mena
a \ `
/ lY r ?
SR 1411 (BUNCE ROAD)
BEG NN PROJECT
. 9 U-3311 =_ Ste ` 1-T I 3 ip3 x .03
.03 .7
ALTERNATIVE 2 95
?' - 119rG a
?` \ ;,• ' ;- (WIDEN EXISTING)
\` \ ? '' a i ..\ '? r" .. •b / 1? 1191 n, ?
3221 ? _ 2 ? .C59J 1
\ =9`l?rt .10 ..... 3 y v
- { I•r9) F
\ ALTERNATIVE 1 g' [3ti 1s3 ?? / s 8 1
(NEW LOCATION) ?• 2' 1291 %
\, ? sra u li°q , 91-
>21 ?, \\ F ?. t3n - ..? Y jrr -`-] .. 'qJ7 ? ? ,] 1e ?• /
rn: - 3Y1913M x - ?rl?^'0? 291 ?' 2?30J ^-.2?e_JJ7IJ3a: T •3:+5 ,.?'J \321;x'5 ,. ?:37 125 1 19]0. 2? 7!U J•/.
^03710.3J5.9 J. 13]51j 'may - ,335 ,a=I'e i 1251 1'^3 yTla6 -'.
F 23T6 - 3739 3-9 129 ,-?b?? =rn 2'0 V - ,0] 2 \
l Son ' t v _ xv ,r ^. 33w ,\
' 3313 u V , 3?`5 _ 3_? ? 1=qy .r 1 252
O - ` f 7J11 ? 2373 321 v ? T]5 :TY\ „? fr- 0r .,I ?? Z ^•??
1IC'3 1329"5 t4? 2'A " 26
YZ3 X21 1 T . :931 / h r` 233J
117 '\ 3
11 , 'RI ?, \ 3 " 1251 2
05 -293= 1 _ Z j I.'•F_4 • 1 1 _
33.5 3'Y,6 1257
3'MS 1 \ ..? ^ 1 29x1 / TO '-a• 5 \ ., 12]O V I
3351 = O j [ ,. r D 33'5 :'._53 f zl3] x\01 2` - I -
4 3 ^ nr3 3 x2-z I ?y 32'5^ 1. --P 1
3S ] [{1
331, 12"
7 '1_.1 .310 t -_I r v
.3] a / Jllly^ .-.5 / 3331
z 'rz 1r1-? Int ,_
2x] - / .`` ,:m ra<z Ie o i r z>? =?oa5 ?] 1 3 1 .r
? 3299 ] 0 Son 12.3 3 , Z? ..,
ry
29 A b 121(
315 ]9 c L• .. 91 331 ayo3392ci51 ?3-53'' 3 13] - 1^a T13 1,
/ 2'Z'1 ,y, f9 33J]Y JQ 3 y 27]F 3]10. _3]S S. X _ IZ]] 0 - 1
J397 .? ,. S - ^ 3"•5 I ` .3? • 3. ^ a 2 6 ..: 123J
/ e 73ri - r 7• . 3 7- . "' 3]I I n ? c e5 - ? ?
'] 3=] '? 1101 3TYJ JTTSy o M o ({[ _ '.'ioH :T 9 c C? \ 1_,5 ??a (. _
1006 / 37i2 - - 1 ?33ri 1 T,!] '?':5 3?13\ ]'% - 1213 ^ 122
J.!'9 /? 1 M 335-•9'^7'f 37Y5? D ]391 .P ._3`„, J ^3 ? _ 1 n 1333 -
3719 1 ?2?5r ?3 3]1p\ '?31 tb7 _?1 8 3312
q .' Y321 „? 29]5 O 'S -. 0'i W 7 t t or . X? 7 32A , 13X3 • u5 Or 299 _
.379 'sS, - 'h..b O. "? - o 72?3 - 1bl - l]') , a 2931'N9 _^3 C
JOrA/ ?
? O ,v

-n ?7- 3
3'J ? 3]1 1 3 ^ ? ??
'
-! ?"
-"29 I
1
-s] -

33)
3 ?] ^ Q
0 c :'22 _
_13
J2'O
y 3
/
'? ? `;t19
y.y3 O
Z \ 3291
_?
\3?'YS ) 33e9 Y
3`6 r1_,1 ' - ? '2' 1
n . t,.y5
?
' 3 C
tl 'a'?2]7
'1571 3r.,
35` _
33?
??a \ ?
..°3 tlo] } ?1 321=
'a
r
? ?s]s 3sn' rn,ry ? .,?....

' 1 9 G
1d O3
Ct ? • (. 3N \
' ?
•
'b SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
3'`53 ' -
Y ? O . 0•
33YJ0
Jaw.
3f9 O
'? 339]^ ' J31] 19331 -
3355 M ..? - ' _
\ ?.y 3 ,.f>3`S9 £ g ° _-]
... -'3 . of 3752 3^95 .

J j
29_1V .,3
1, Y.n'S /'
10 / f- 1139 23_x• ,135

3251 '-'' a .O W
6
"• •`
,dal 1y
3571 3y'9 795)
7-5 1
S a ?
M,g
3sn ? /'c
3519
.05 ?.
3n
3; 1 a
P19 END PROJECT
• 3? ? ° ?, 11.,311
I ? ? ?11 3n3
3].e?
'33 3-]
I ,7235 ? 3]]9
I
1235 _
a
M
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF TILkNSPORTATION'
3 DIVISION OF 111GIINYAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAI
BR.',\Cli
FAYETTEVILLE
SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
FROM US 401 (RAEFORD ROAD)
TO PROPOSED HOPE MILLS BYPASS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-3311
FIGURE 1
rd a ? ? ? ? ?s ? ?s

?, ? 0 O O
o 0
0 0 0
U
O ?
. N
oo G? C)
H N N N N
69 69 69 ?
«+

CS CD CD
O O O O

. W..
? 00 U'1 Vl
N N N
6
9 rvq 6
0 64
? v
O CA
?
?''L
a' ++
, O
p O
O
p O

O O

O
O CS ,Q O O O
?.5 on o op o 0
:a cl kn

, O
W CN

`?

O

64

a4
f
a Eoq
a
U
boo
.?.. a
u
a
r ?
0
00 00 00 00

0 0 0 0

o

? ? J O
y
^y O ^? N N .O
z
:? r
a ? a l •? f?
Z3 v y I
~
Q' E Q

r iz-

. f
?SIAj[?0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
February 11, 1998
MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Cyndi Bell
DWQ - DENR
FROM: H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheets for Fayetteville, SR 1141 (Bingham
Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills
Bypass, widen to a multi-lane facility, Cumberland County,
Federal Aid No. STP-1141(7), State Project No. 8.244290 1,
TIP Project No. U-3311
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the subject project
(See attached map for project location). The purpose of these sheets and the related review
procedure is to have an early "meeting of the minds" as to the scope of work that should be
performed and thereby enable us to better implement the project. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for Thursday, February 26, 1998 at 2:00 pm in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Conference Room (Room 470). You may provide us with your
comments at the meeting or niail them io us prior to thae date.
Thank you for your assistance in this part of our planning process. If there are any
questions about the meeting or the scoping sheets, please call Craig Young, Project Planning
Engineer, at 733-7844, Ext. 243.
CY/plr
Attachment
D
SCOPING SHEET
TIP # U-3311
PROJECT # 8.2442901
F.A. PROJECT # STP-1141(7)
DIVISION: 6 COUNTY: Cumberland
Date: February 11, 1998
Revision Date:
Project Development Stage
F] Programming
Planning
Design
ROUTE: Fayetteville - SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to proposed
Hope Mills Bypass
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: Urban Local
LENGTH: 4.34 km (2.70 mi)
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: The purpose of this project is to alleviate congestion and improve
safety on SR 1141 (Bingham Drive).
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (INCLUDING SPECIFIC LIMITS) AND MAJOR
ELEMENTS OF WORK: The proposed project consists of widening SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope Mills Bypass to a five-
lane curb and gutter section. A five-lane curb and gutter facility on new location is proposed
from SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive) to US 401.
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT TO BE PREPARED: EA
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY SCHEDULE: EA May 1999
Right of Way Schedule
Construction Schedule
FY 2003
FY 2004
WILL THERE BE SPECIAL FUNDING PARTICIPATION BY MUNICIPALITY,
DEVELOPERS, OR OTHERS? Yes ? No M
IF YES, BY WHOM AND AMOUNT: ($)_____, or_____ (%)
HOW AND WHEN WILL THIS BE PAID?
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
TYPE OF ACCESS CONTROL: Full ? Partial rj None
NUMBER OF: Interchanges 0 Grade Separations 0 Stream Crossings I(Unnamed Tributary
for Beaver Creek)
TYPICAL SECTION OF ROADWAY:
Existing: SR 1141 (Bingham Drive): Two lane, two-way facility
that varies from 20 to 24 feet (6.1 to 7.3 m) in width,
with 1-foot (0.3 m) paved shoulders.
Proposed: Widen to a 64-foot (19.5 m) wide (face to face), five-
lane, curb and gutter cross-section on existing alignment
from proposed Hope Mills Bypass to SR 3328 (Marykirk
Drive). North of SR 3328 (Marykirk Drive), SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) will be relocated on new location to
intersect with US 401 (Raeford Road) opposite of
SR 1411 (Bunce Road). The typical section for the new
location will be a 65-foot (19.8 m) wide (face to face),
five-lane, curb and gutter section.
TRAFFIC (ADT): Current (2000): 14,500 vpd Design Year (2020): 22,200 vpd
TTST 1% DUAL 3% DHV 10%
DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE: AASHTO © 3R F-]
DESIGN SPEED: 80 km/h (50 mph)
CURRENT COST ESTIMATE:
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies) ....................... $ 7,950,000
Right of Way Cost (including relocation,
utilities and acquisition) ...... ............ $ 2,800,000
Force Account Items ........................... $
Preliminary Engineering ......................... $
Total Cost ................................... $ 10,750,000
TIP COST ESTIMATE:
Construction .................................. $ 9,650,000
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Right of Way .................................. $ 2,300,000
TOTAL TIP COST ESTIMATE .................. $ 12,450,000
LIST ANY SPECIAL FEATURES. SUCH AS RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT, WHICH
COULD AFFECT COST OR SCHEDULE OF PROJECT:
ITEMS REQUIRED (X) COMMENTS COST
Estimated Costs of Improvements:
® Pavement:
®Surface ......................................... $ 2,047,495
?Base ........................................... $
?Asphalt Cement $
?Pavement Removal ............................... $
?Turnouts ....................................... $
? Shoulders:
? Paved .......................................... $
? Earthen ........................................ $
® Earthwork ............................................ $ 794,205
® Fine Grading $ 105,000
? Subsurface Items ....................................... $
© Subgrade and Stabilization ................................ $ 305,440
© Drainage (List any special items) ........................... $ 918,600
? Sub-Drainage ......................................... $
? Structures Width x Length
? Bridge Rehabilitation ----- .......... $
? New Bridge ----- x .......... $
? Widen Bridge ----- x ----- .......... $
? Remove Bridge ----- .......... $
? New Culvert: Size ----- Length ----- .......... $
? Culvert Extension ................................. $
? Retaining Walls $
? Noise Walls ..................................... $
? Other Misc. Structures $
® Concrete Curb & Gutter ................................. $ 291,600
© Utilities $ 300,000
? Concrete Sidewalk ..................................... $
? Guardrail ............................................ $
? Guardrail Anchors $
? Fencing: W.W. ? and/or C.L.? .......................... $
© Erosion Control ....................................... $ 43,200
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
ITEMS REQUIRED (X) COMMENTS COST
? Landscaping .......................................... $
? Lighting ............................................ $
? Traffic Control ........................................ $ 142,000
? Signing:
? New .......................................... $
? Upgraded ....................................... $
® Traffic Signals: ,
® New .......................................... $ 45,000
? Revised ........................................ $
? RR Signals:
F-? New ........................................... $
? Revised ......................................... $
? With or Without Arms .............................. $
? If 3R:
? Drainage Safety Enhancement ........................ $
? Roadside Safety Enhancement ........................ $
? Realignment for Safety Upgrade ....................... $
® Pavement Markings:
Paint .......................................... $
Thermo ......................................... $ 49,680
? Markers ......................................... $
? Delineators ........................................... $
?Other clearing,grubbing,mobilization,misc ...................... $ 1,871,780
Contract Cost Subtotal ................................ $ 6,914,000
Engineering & Contingencies ................................. $ 1,036,000
Preliminary Engineering Costs ................................ $
Force Account ............................................ $
CONSTRUCTION Subtotal: ..................... $ 7,950,000
Right of Way:
EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH: Varies from approximately 60 to 80 feet
(18.3 to 24.4 m).
IS ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY NEEDED?
Yes ® No ?
? Proposed Right of Way Width: 90 ft (27.4 m) along .......... $
existing alignment and 100 feet (30.5 m) on new location.
? Easements: Type Width .......... $
? Utilities: .............................................. $
RIGHT OF WAY SUBTOTAL..... $ 2,800,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 10,750,000
Prepared By:
Date:
THE ABOVE SCOPING INFORMATION HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED
BY:
INIT. DATE INIT. DATE
Highway Design Board of Tran. Member
Roadway Board of Tran. Member
Structure Dir . Plan. & Prog.
Design Services Dep. Admin.-Preconst.
Geotechnical Chief Engineer-Oper.
Hydraulics Secondary Roads Off.
Loc. & Surveys Construction Branch
Photogrammetry Roadside Environmental
Prel. Est. Engr. Maintenance Branch
Planning & Envir. Bridge Maintenance
Right of Way Statewide Planning
R/W Utilities Division Engineer
Traffic Engineering Bicycle Coordinator
Project Management Program Development
County Manager FHWA
City/Municipality Dept. of Cult. Res.
Others Dept. of ENR
Others Others
Scoping Sheet for local officials will be sent to Division Engineer for handling.
IF YOU ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH PROPOSED PROJECT OR SCOPING,
NOTE YOUR PROPOSED REVISIONS BELOW AND INITIAL AND DATE AFTER
COMMENTS.
r kll ?r I: g Cadwm ; 1
$prin ake • is woos
ft-ft
CUM'. 6:t R_ L A NfD?, ?'
f1CN 5
Eayegvilf 97 = J ?y.
°
i .r V5 3
_ r
•?!? 59. C'3Vander 14
I 1,
000,
/V(+d PfldnOt ?ti}__; ?'ii' tedma
1 9 -T? volo
1 3,11 7
Kop • ?,•. Cedar Creek
0.00
/ IS Lena
+ 97 1\ 710
Little
/ No.rrr • ? ?
ft-ft
clell"
7 •? 2 O f
.01
BEGIN PROJECT IM 1318
• ® ..1 p C
M 2 0 1-2 C
1=7 3
.10 72 01
?Il \1 !iCa
_ l .4• ,o?].IZ ? e ? ?? ? ? .? ? •o, 3-4 ? 119 L v I ? g p$ o llso ? U p .ael-.n3 ?
601 5\ 137" ?IIr+S _ ro_. _ YI. 't1
NEW LOCATION
8 11 X23
-?=9
rn ^ ? `" ^F 8 ? 13.5) ? ? '' " ,x ? 4 ?c35 F > . ti 2465 '
. i° Ji» 1-3=.A 3yq ? .y9 '? X210 _ ?aJ - I
? 33'S _ ? rt 1=^3
X, M
_Z =21 1103 Ir I'3 ro? / " =J7 34,
/ 3 ?n .W J =] 1^'./s '7 T g T-63 1?µ•tl c ^-a_
_d 'G 3 2 - C ?_ .-?.! \ 1}w « ? ra •.-e 1:91
77
YJ63 3'-+5 315 x '\ ?'G =/ `° \V2-x3 1 12)?V ° ?' :
. 1z,o
txs ?'°] •? "- 13-s 6 ,,..,,_3 , 37n - 30"t
/ .3) a 3j6iV'=? 3-3 C .c 13,J-. 9- I 111,... 1z+1 `9 8• g =n --
'°J. \ ?»G 33:a r -'; 0 ,c .0)`'3"X` C 30)3 NJ 33]6 /13-_} 12r O .r? •202
3710 • 133] ?. _129. Y ;? _,'[_ I _-,5 '?
_3 773 /
sT r - z ,
3??S
?„?) F \3?32 - '?'9 ""'1 7 C' '\5 - _'S 'w v5
37171
. ?`•?. J•)3J5Q G ??] 13'v =_t0 Z]2 'n 3Jtl
' 3T-f.l" ? 3?_v5? C -'J o n I3.3 M1 -
3_9
i);z .1a 7no\ ? n 8 rrz ,. '8 ,m.
7379 v "S ?) n LZ \ 7 _ 33:) 1' - r] x 1-
29]5 3r5 ' Zr - 213 i I? ? 3F'w I3±7 • ?5 h n o , r- r
a U
?'• 11 .a 3 34'7 (q 13]1 5I - Y I"'\5-T 8 !-_
? r. r-» ?•i ?Y - _ 8 7?1? f_ - 3='3 . y y 3?`a ? 11-n rrl ° 123 /J-?? -
n ,?, ? n ? ... :K 3` 7 n" .,? ,' 135) -•e _ ° //
, 12316 _
--5 ?3. 53?ua' ? /xv ? x?+•, ?s 6o-. •:) , ?7? - I 1?<9 Y5 ''? ^F ?-c- E _ '-a1 ,,,7 (f '_
71 •1i5 J'i) \ 3-n. -c-5 35]] a•~ rt ?. vs ..a
IOC 'f F . L \ 3'A) -13 O 3?57 3K.2 ?0 ? ? o 1167
33`_9c b 3T_•J T>.s6 ? 0 3'>a?'_-: / I i 35 P ? -.
•\ 3=?^' X7.0 ?4 Jai] p IR ]'a' 4 0,? f CS 13`/K ?•' -?•^7 _ Y51/ J- C e11633. n3
79)
'? ? ?,-?? R LT - •Kn3?1, '??- W ? ?? i f. I„A ^.""-3/n ?:• 1161 ? ° ? ?_
? >.,? . oa 33.+2 336, ?y,6 B gyn. ? z s r-"'' Na r _ J ? , ,
?'-
9 3< 3
- -•_.? '? 'Ora '
3519 ` 'r
35n -,1 4 C
3519
Jrz ?O. •T, 11-.
END PROJECT ,! 3 3
I - . ? r?s
3371 I 3n6
I
7].1
I 3_1
? i,

C:3

C7 d ? ?
o a

o •
d ° ' g
P
0o Q

Q 0

•

? "P b
o o

r' ?I

4p0
• P

O
s

ri 4 d

o ?

.? Y A

O ?

r l
p P ?
OCT
O
?
g
? •a

'I

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
March 4, 1998
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
i
FROM: Craig Young
Project Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting Minutes for the widening of SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, Federal Aid
Project No. STP-1141(7), State Project 8.2442901,
TIP Project U-3311
On February 26, 1998 a Scoping meeting was held on the above referenced
project. The following attended the meeting:
Art McMillan Roadway Design
Harry Thompson Roadway Design
Gary Lovering Roadway Design
Ray McIntyre Program Development
Lanette Cook Program Development
Darrell Hensdale Statewide Planning
John Taylor Location & Surveys
Rob Allen Photogrammetry
Jonathan Tyndall Traffic Engineering Branch
Shane York Traffic Engineering Branch
Jerry Snead Hydraulics
Betty C. Yancey Right of Way Branch
o+
Scoping Meeting Minutes
February 26, 1998
Paoe 2
Steve Varnedoe
Tracy Conrad Pittman
Ray Goff
Greg Burns
Rob Stone
Debbie Bevin
Rick Heicksen
Thomas Speight, Jr
Lubin Prevatt
Wilson Stroud
Craig Young
Division 6
Division 6
Division 6
Division 6
Division 6
State Historic Preservation Office
Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization
Public Works Commission - Fayetteville
Planning and Environmental
Planning and Environmental
Planning and Environmental
The findings and recommendations from this meeting and other scoping
comments are outlined below:
The State Historic Preservation Office stated that no archaeological or
architectural surveys would be needed for this project.
2. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) commented that one minor stream crossing
(unnamed tributary of Beaver Creek) of a Class "C" water is present on the proposed
project located within the proposed new location portion of the project. NWI mapping
shows no wetlands impacted by the proposed project; surveys for wetlands will be
conducted by NCDOT in the coming months. DWQ stated that if there is more than 150
feet of impacts to the stream, mitigation would be necessary. DWQ also stated that
mitigation would be necessary if more than one acre wetlands is impacted by the project.
Program Development stated that the project is on a production schedule and
that right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin in November, 2001 with construction
to begin in July, 2003.
4. Location and Surveys stated that in addition to aerial utilities along the project,
underground telephone lines are present. The underground cables run along the east side
of Bingham Drive and are located mostly under the existing pavement.
5. Hydraulics stated that a floodway modification study will probably be
necessary for the crossing of the unnamed tributary to Beaver Creek. Hydraulics will
coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the city of
Fayetteville regarding this modification. A single barrel box culvert will probably be
needed for the stream crossing.
6. There was discussion concerning the proposed typical section for Bingham
Drive. The Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) requested a
four-lane divided typical section with a 16 foot raised median for the entire project.
Scoping h1ecting Minutes
February 26, 1998
Page 3
Roadway Design stated that the divided section would not be feasible for the more
heavily developed section of Bingham Drive due to the number of side streets that tie into
Bingham Drive, which would require median breaks. They suggested that a combination
of a four-lane divided section and a five-lane curb and gutter section be used. The four-
lane divided section would be used for the new location portion of the project to
approximately Crestwood Avenue, as well as for the section of Bingham Drive from
Bailey Lake Road to Fisher Road. The five-lane curb and gutter section would be used
from Crestwood Avenue to Bailey Lake Road in order to accommodate the turning
movements for the bordering development. The median for the four-lane section would
be a grassed median and the city would be responsible for the maintenance of the median.
A municipal agreement would be needed between the county, the city, and NCDOT
before the median would be constructed. The MPO was in favor of this widening scheme
and agreed that the City would be responsible for the maintenance of the median.
Roadway Design will prepare preliminary designs for both a symmetrical widening
design and a "best fit" widening design involving a combination of symmetrical, east
side, and west side widening. Both alternatives will be shown at the Citizen's
Informational Workshop to get the public's comments on both widening alternatives.
7. The Division stated that the new location portion of the project should not be
controlled access. The needed right of way for this project would be from the back of the
berm on each side of the roadway and will require an estimated 80 to 90 feet of right of
way, plus easements.
8. The new location portion is necessary, along with TIP Project U-620 and TIP
Project U-3424, to complete the envisioned multilane north-south arterial between
Cliffdale Road and US 301/1-95 Business. Program Development noted the feasibility
study recommended the new location portion and indicated that widening existing
Bingham Drive from US 401 to Mary Kirk Road need not be studied.
9. The 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) includes this
project as an incidental bicycle and sidewalk project. The MPO has requested that
bicycle and pedestrian accommodations be included in this project. Planning and
Environmental will coordinate with the NCDOT Office of Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation on the appropriate facilities for this project. Two options will be
evaluated: (1) 14-foot outside lanes with 12-foot inside lanes and (2) 13-foot outside
lanes with 11-foot inside lanes. Roadway stated that either 14-foot outside lanes or 13-
foot outside lanes would accommodate bicycles and could be incorporated into the
project with no additional right of way impacts. The MPO requested sidewalk along one
side of the project. The project is not within the city limits of Fayetteville. City officials
indicated the city limits end at US 401, but are expected to be extended southward in two
to four years. NCDOT will forward a copy of the NCDOT Pedestrian Policy Guidelines
tot he City of Fayetteville and the Fayetteville Area MPO. A formal request from the
City addressing the need for sidewalk based on the guidelines will be neccessary before
NCDOT considers the construction of sidewalk for this project.
Scoping Mccting Minutes
February 26, 1998
Page 4
10. The Division stated that the intersections of Bingham Drive and MaryKirk
Road and Bingham Drive and Bailey Lake Road would need to be signalized under this
project. Bailey Lake Road may be signalized prior to the letting of U-3311, but Marykirk
Road should be signalized under U-3311. Traffic Engineering stated that they would like
a closed loop system for the entire project. Roadway stated that Bailey Lake Road will
be realigned under this project to tie into the intersection of Bingham Drive and Bibar
Road.
11. A privacy fence (part wood, part brick) approximately 300 feet in length
parallels Bingham Drive on the east side approximately 20 feet from the edge of
pavement from approximately 800 feet north of Crestwood Avenue to Greenock Avenue.
NCDOT will compensate the property owners if the privacy fence is removed as part of
the project, but will not construct a new privacy fence. The possibility of constructing a
noise wall in this area was discussed. It was noted that NCDOT normally does not build
noise walls on non-controlled access roads such as Bingham Drive.
12. Cost Estimates
Cost Estimate
Right of Way: $2,800,000
Construction: $7.950.000
Total: $10,750,000
TIP Funding
Right of Way $2,800,000
Construction $5.400.000
$8,200,000
Difference: S2,550,000
13. Preliminary mapping is scheduled to be completed in June 1998. Preliminary
designs showing slope stakes and right of way should be completed in September of
1998. A Citizen's Informational Workshop will be held in late April or early May of
1998. The Environmental Assessment is scheduled to be complete in May 1999. A
Public Hearing will be held approximately 3 months afterwards and the FONSI is
scheduled to be completed in January 2000. Roadway Design stated that they will
request both a construction cost estimate and a right of way estimate for the project after
the preliminary designs are completed.
14. TIP Project U-3424 will realign SR 1411 (Bunce Road) at its intersection
with US 401. The new location portion of Bingham Drive (TIP Project U-3311) will tie
into the new intersection of SR 1411 and US 401.
Scoping Mecting N inutcs
February 26. 1998
Page >
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Any comments,
additions, or revisions to the minutes should be sent to me at 733-7844 extension 243.
CMY/
cc: Scoping Participants

e- ,8W
A_)e ftJQ
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
July 31, 1998
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 2761
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
AUG 119'3
VPTER (1UALITY
This responds to your letter of June 26, 1998, requesting information from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) for the purpose of evaluating the potential environmental impacts of a
proposal to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US 401 (Raeford Road) to the proposed Hope
Mills Bypass, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina (TLP No. U-3311). This report
provides scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA) (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves as initial
scoping comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their permitting and/or
certification processes for this project.
In the original start of study letter dated March 26, 1998 the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) proposed the widening of Bingham Drive to a multi-lane curb and
gutter facility from SR 1107 (Fisher Road) to SR 3328 (Marykirk Road), and the construction of
a multi-lane facility, on new location, from Marykirk Road to Raeford Road at the SR 1141
(Bunce Road) intersection.
An alternative to the new location portion (Alternative 1) of this project is now being studied
under the subject project. This alternative (Alternative 2) proposes to widen Bingham Drive to a
multi-lane curb and gutter facility from Marykirk Road to US 401 along the existing alignment.
Symmetrical widening, asymmetrical widening, or a combination of the two will be studied in
order to reduce impacts to existing developments and the environment. Approximately 27.4
meters (90 feet) of right-of-way will be required for the proposed improvements.

The mission of the Service is to provide leadership in the conservation, protection, and
enhancement of fish and wildlife, and their habitats, for the continuing benefit of all people. Due
to staffing limitations, we are unable to provide you with site-specific comments at this time.
However, the following recommendations are provided to assist you in your planning process and
to facilitate a thorough and timely review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practical as outlined in Section 404 (b)(1) of the Clean Water Act Amendments
of 1977. In regard to avoidance and minimization of impacts, we recommend that proposed
highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways, utility corridors, or previously
developed areas in order to minimize habitat fragmentation and encroachment. Areas exhibiting
high biodiversity or ecological value important to the watershed and region should be avoided.
Crossings of streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings and/or occur
on a structure wherever feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert structures that maintain
natural water flows and hydraulic regimes without scouring, or impeding fish and wildlife passage,
should be employed. Highway shoulder and median widths should be reduced through wetland
areas. Roadway embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion
control devices and techniques. Wherever appropriate, construction in sensitive areas should
occur outside fish spawning and migratory bird nesting seasons.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map of the Fayetteville 7.5 Minute Quadrangle does not
show any significant wetlands within the project area, except for an existing crossing of a tributary
to Beaver Creek. However, while the NWI maps are useful for providing an overview of a given
area, they should not be relied upon in lieu of a detailed wetland delineation by trained personnel
using an acceptable wetland classification methodology.
We reserve the right to review any federal permits that may be required for this project, at the
public notice stage. We may have no objection, provide recommendations for modification of the
project, or recommend denial. Therefore, it is important that resource agency coordination occur
early in the planning process in order to resolve any conflicts that may arise and minimize delays
in project implementation.
In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the environmental documentation for this
project include the following in sufficient detail to facilitate a thorough review of the action:
A clearly defined purpose and need for the proposed project, including a discussion to the
projects's independent utility;
2. A description of the proposed action with an analysis of all alternatives being considered,
including the upgrading of existing roads and a "no action" alternative;
A description of the fish and wildlife resources, and their habitats, within the project
impact area that may be directly or indirectly affected;
2
4. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that are to be impacted
by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, or draining. Acres of wetland impact should be
differentiated by habitat type based on the wetland classification scheme of the
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Wetland boundaries should be determined by using
the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps);
The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and permanent, that would be
likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed project. The assessment should also
include the extent to which the proposed project would result in secondary impacts to
natural resources, and how this and similar projects contribute to cumulative adverse
effects;
6. Design features and construction techniques which would be employed to avoid or
minimize the fragmentation or direct loss of wildlife habitat value,
7. Design features, construction techniques, or any other mitigation measures which would
be employed at wetland crossings and stream channel relocations to avoid or
minimize impacts to waters of the United States; and,
If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend that every effort be made to
identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance. Project planning should include a
detailed compensatory mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland impacts.
Opportunities to protect mitigation areas in perpetuity, preferably via conservation
easement, should be explored at the outset.
The attached pages identify the federally-listed endangered, threatened, and candidate species that
are known to occur in Cumberland County. Habitat requirements for the federally-listed species
in the project area should be compared with the available habitat at the project site. If suitable
habitat is present within the action area of the project; field surveys for the listed species should be
performed. Environmental documentation should include survey methodologies and results. In
addition to this guidance, the following information should be included in the document regarding
protected species:
A map and description of the specific area used in the analysis of direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts;
2. A description of the biology and status of the listed species and the habitat of the species
that may be affected by the action, including the results of any onsite inspections;
3. An analysis of the "effects of the action" on the listed species and associated habitat
which includes consideration of
a. The environmental baseline which is an analysis of the effects of past and ongoing
human and natural factors leading to the current status of the species and its
habitat;
b. The impacts of past and present federal, state, and private activities in the project
area and cumulative impacts area;
The direct and indirect impacts of the proposed action. Indirect effects are those
that are caused by the proposed action and are later in time, but are still
reasonably certain to occur;
d. The impacts of interrelated actions (those that are part of a larger action and
depend on the larger action for their justification) and interdependent actions
(those that have no independent utility apart from the action under consideration);
and,
C. The cumulative impacts of future state and private activities (not requiring federal
agency involvement) that will be considered as part of future Section 7
consultation;
4. A description of the manner in which the action may affect any listed species or
associated habitat including project proposals to reduce/eliminate adverse effects. Direct
mortality, injury, harassment, the loss of habitat, and/or the degradation of habitat are all
ways in which listed species may be adversely affected;
A summary of evaluation criteria to be used as a measure of potential effects. Criteria
may include post-project population size, long-term population viability, habitat quality,
and/or habitat quantity; and,
6. Based on evaluation criteria, a determination of whether the project is not likely to
adversely affect or may affect threatened and endangered species.
Candidate species are those plant and animal species for which the Service has sufficient
information on their biological status and threats to their survival to propose them as endangered
or threatened under the ESA. Although candidate species receive no statutory protection under
the ESA, federal agencies are required to informally confer with the Service on actions likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of these species or that may destroy or modify proposed
critical habitat.
Federal species of concern (FSC) include those species for which the Service does not have
enough scientific information to support a listing proposal or species which do not warrant listing
at the present time. These species receive no statutory protection under the ESA, but could
become candidates in the future if additional scientific information becomes available indicating
4
that they are endangered or threatened. Formal listing places the species under the full protection
of the ESA, and necessitates a new survey if its status in the project area is unknown. Therefore,
it would be prudent for the NCDOT to avoid any adverse impacts to candidate species or their
habitat. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be contacted for information on
species under state protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please continue to advise
us during the progression of the planning process, including your official determination of the
impacts of this project. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact
Tom McCartney at 919-856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely,
-?-. ?? -\
jvzz!-7z?
L pf John M. Hefner
D? Ecological Services Supervisor
Enclosures
cc:
COE, Wilmington, NC (Scott McLendon)
NCDOT, Raleigh, NC (Craig Young)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (Cyndi Bell)
WRC, Creedmoor, NC (David Cox)
FHWA, Nicholas Graf, Raleigh, NC
EPA, Ted Bisterfield, Atlanta, GA
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:07/31/98:919/856-4520 extension 32:\U-331 Ltip
U-331 1B
Subject: U-331 1B
From: Beth Barnes <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:18:48 -0400
To: "richard.k. spencer@ saw02.usace. army.mil"
<richard.k.spencer @ saw02.usace.army.mil>
Good morning, Richard. This is just a follow-up to the voice mail
message I left you today. For some reason PD&EA (Carla Dagnino)
contacted me about this project yesterday. She was questioning some
of the standard DWQ language, and she questioned some of the USACE
404 permit conditions. To shorten this somewhat, she eventually
asked if DWQ was "OK" with DOT's desire to drop some of the
conditions for the 404 permit. I carefully explained that I could
not change anything in a USACE 404 permit. I then stated that DWQ
was concerned about protecting the high quality bottom land hardwood
wetland system being impacted by this project. I hoped this was a
gentle way of saying that DWQ supported the USACE conditions. Now
all of this is clear as mud. If you have any questions, please let
me know. Hope you had a good 4th holiday. Beth
1 of 1 7/7/2004 9:20 AM
OF 1V ? fF?,
[J
NJ- P. 0.4'. r.-
. -C- D? of FY. ru.a®t a.6 n'sw. Ae?mw.
.Wn N' d.m1,DL. Duwa
wrr v w.n- ]u.Lry
WruH S\luu. Drtil:?u
Division of Water Quality
Department of Eni ironmental and natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
Slrer( Address.
i\lailing Addt :
Contact Information:
Fat To., Grlw D•3nne
CoInpany: NLbe'f' )Dtgc
2321 C_atwcx Roulcvnra, Suite 250
" Zh, NC 2'ttik4 2260
1650 Mini Service Can=
Ita:60. NC 2-;699-1630
Phone M: 919-733-17M
Fac tF. 919-733-GB93
Fa: $: 316- 15ot
Date: L)xele4-
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notts or special instructlons:
Carla,
71 1- n"d 2044h1= I Weasc let
r•+e k?Pw• .
15!JA41: Sewef R,A.?Ir i. r:f ].n+P 1651 ?M..l..A +ue.l
1']i 1 :w',ns l: •?P.R:]L..?C 1'lAF:26J:.ottaa/
1?:?)'!J-'. ?Yh,;M.l iIY ?I A!•1 ;6r1. h'D/? 4?nn..?We mu..hu?xl,.ir?
...Qa,LSIWSNVHI ZN Hnooa ZNsoad 10 HOKd ,IM11,9
HO
woa
,,6C,00
SS:ZT SZ-Nnr
£/£
TOSTSTL6
S,L'Insad
aaON
Swil QaSdK'Ia
aKII LdVLS
SaOKd
SNOHd
£689££L6T6 'Ias
SQNK'I=M-6MQ HHVN
99:ZT I2id 'vOOZ-SZ-Nnr HZKQ
NOIMUNOO ONIGNSS
WAr?9Q?
> DEW
Street Address:- 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Mailing Address: 1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Contact Information: Phone #: [phone]
Fax #: [phone]
Fax To: Car I A -Dag n; n n Fax 115 , t 5D J
Company: NCDoT LDN6 Date: L )2 61.D +
Number of pages including cover sheet: 3
Notes or special instructions:
Carla,
Tr you nud qn4 4jhirq P.46e PIEQSC l r,l-
me 12now•
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Wetlands/401 Unit
4k q,
140 E
I
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlaads
O?O? W AT ?R
r
waaa,
D ?
May 7, 2004
Cumberland County
DWQ Project No. 040694
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Dr. Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in
0.19 acres of jurisdictional wetlands, 56 linear feet of streams, and 0.01 acres of other surface waters. The project
purpose is the widening and improving SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from the proposed Hope Mills Bypass to US 401
(Raeford Road) in Cumberland County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated
Aspri120, 2004 (received April 27, 2004). After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is
covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide
Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits
before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge
and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless
otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) All stormwater runoff shall be directed to sheetflow through stream buffers at nonerosive velocities, unless
approved otherwise by this certification.
3.) During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers.
4.) Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing
season following completion of construction.
5.) The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing should not be modified by
widening the stream channel or reducing the depth of the stream. Disturbed floodplains and streams should be
restored to natural geomorphic conditions.
MCI
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
Michael F. Easley, Governor
OF W ATF9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
j O? pG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
C?
DTW
6.) Any riprap used must not interfere with thalweg performance and aquatic life passage during low flow
conditions.
7.) All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
8.) Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface
waters is prohibited.
9.) The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary as well as along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked by orange fabric fencing for the areas that
have been approved to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities.
10.) Two copies of the final construction drawings shall be furnished to NCDWQ prior to the pre-construction
meeting. Written verification shall be provided that the final construction drawings comply with the attached
permit drawings contained in the application dated April 20, 2004.
11.) A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be posted on the construction site at all times. In addition, the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division
Engineer and the on-site project manager.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Since 1 ,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\TIP U-3311\wqc\040694 wgc.doc
qJ 6
STATr u
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E.
EEP Transition Manager
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Dear Sir:
LYNDo TWPETT
SECRETARY
WETLANDS 1401 CROUP
t=kPR 2 2004
WATER QUALITY SErCTI
Subject: Cumberland County. Widening. of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from the
proposed Hope Mills Bypass to North of US 401 (Raeford Road). Federal Aid
No. STP-1141 (7), State Project No. 8.2442901, TIP No. U-3311B, WBS Element
34917.3.3.
The purpose of this letter is to request that the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
provide confirmation of willingness to provide compensatory mitigation for the project in
accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement (MCA) signed July 22, 2003 by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (ACE), the N.C. Department of Natural Resources (DENR), and the N.C.
Department of Transportation (NCDOT).
NCDOT proposes to widen SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to a multi-lane facility from the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass to US 401 (Raeford Road) including a new section on new location between
SR 3328 (Mary Kirk Drive) and US 401. The length of the proposed Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) project U-331 1B is approximately 2.8 miles.
RESOURCES UNDER THE, JURISDICTION OF SECTION 404 AND 401 OF THE
CLEAN WATER ACT.
NCDOT has avoided and minimized the impacts to jurisdictional areas to the greatest extent
practicable as described in the permit application. A copy of the permit application can be found
at littp://www.ncdot.org/planning/pe/naturalunit/Applications.html. The remaining impacts to
jurisdictional areas requiring mitigation consist of 0.19 acre to riverine wetlands. These impacts
will be compensated for by mitigation provided by the EEP.
The project is located in the outer Coastal Plain physiographic province and the eastern Sandhills
physiographic province in Cumberland County in the Cape Fear River Basin (United States
Geologic Survey [USGS] Hydrologic Catalog Unit 03030004, N.C. Division of Water Quality
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
April 20, 2004
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: MVW.NCDOT.ORG
LOCATION:
2728 CAPITAL BLVD
PLB SUITE 168
RALEIGH NC 27604

[DWQ] Subbasin 03-06-15). Jurisdictional impacts and proposed compensatory mitigation are
as follows.
Jurisdictional Stream Impacts: Stream impacts total 56 linear feet to a perennial unnamed
tributary (UT) to Beaver Creek (DWQ Stream Index Number 18-31-24-5) within Site 1. Because
the proposed impacts to the stream are less than 150 linear feet, they will not require mitigation.
Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts: Wetland impacts total 0.19 acre to a riverine alluvial swamp
wetland within Site 1. Compensatory mitigation is proposed to consist of mitigation provided by
EEP for the 0.19 acre of impacts.
Please send the letter of confirmation to Richard Spencer (ACE Coordinator) at U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, Post Office Box 1890, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28402-1890. Please indicate that the EEP will provide 0.19 acre of compensatory
mitigation for the aforementioned wetland impacts. Mr. Spencer's FAX number is 919-251-
4025. The current let date for the project is June 15, 2004.
In order to satisfy regulatory assurances that mitigation will be performed; the DWQ requires a
formal letter from EEP indicating willingness and ability to provide the mitigation work
requested by NCDOT. The NCDOT requests such a letter of confirmation be addressed to Mr.
John Hennessy of the DWQ, with copies submitted to NCDOT.
If you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to call Carla
Dagnino at 919-715-1456.
Sincerely,
??Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.,
Environmental Management Director
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. William Gilmore, P.E., EEP Raleigh
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. Craig Young, PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Mr. John F. Sullivan, III, FHWA
Mr. Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Jim Rerko, Division Environmental Officer
.. •.1117..
r '' rt
5 ' M1.2
?v -ry/ r
STATE 01' NOwn i CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
NIICI IAEL F. EASLEY fl LYNDO TIIIPI.17
GOVERNOR WETLANDS 10i C?RO?.?? SECRETARY
April 15, 2004 a` PR
Mr. Richard Spencer WATER QU -D-',Iy C=
USACE, NCDOT Coordinator
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, N.C. 28402-1890
Subject: Request for Jurisdictional Determination renewal for TIP U-33 I 1 B, proposed
widening of SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) from US401 Raeford Road) to the proposed
Hope Mills Bypass at SR 1107 (Fisher Road) in Cumberland County. State Project
No. 82442901, Federal Project No. STP-1141(7), WBS Element 34917
Dear Mr. Spencer:
The purpose of this letter is to request a jurisdictional determination for the wetland sites that occur
on this project. In 1998, the NCDOT conducted field investigations along the project site. Two
wetland areas were delineated and Dave Timpy of the USACE issued a jurisdictional determination.
One wetland is located along Bingham Road and the other wetland is located at the proposed new
road location slightly west of Bingham Road. On March 30, 2004 NCDOT revisited the site and
found no change in the previous wetland determination. A topographical map and plan sheet
(wetlands are highlighted) attached show the location of wetlands in the project area. The existing
permit drawings reflect the existing wetland sites at this time.
This project is a Design Build with a production schedule LET date of June 15, 2004.
Thank you for your time. Please contact Carla Dagnino at [phone] if you have any questions
concerning this request.
Sincerely,
Phi 'p S. F rris, III, P.E.
Manager, Office of Natural Environment
Cc: Craig Young, P.E., PDEA, Project Planning Engineer
John 1-lennessy, NCDWQ
U-331 I B File
Attachments
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DiJ'AF? rnrrrr O: Tr'AW,P1,11Tn nr,rr
11w)ir.,,rDiyrr,;iw rrrAnuErrvwr;nmr-nutAruir;r;
1518 Mmi ;r i•vn;r Cr rrn r,
Pm i i"'I Nr; 216T) 151"1
Tr_i u,iio rar 119-715-1500
FAX [phone]
W.L',In- WWWfIcooro!%,
LOCATION:
272 CAPI ra L'i rt,
PL[S 'i';r„ 11,3
Rioi i"If NC i71,'i4

Tff
0
0
v7
III
moss fi•a --
r
aaffa•fffy¦fsV r
f

/
v o v `° .n ?
N O Q
cei
r
U RCC7 ? Y CJ
p N U 0 N cu
CL m.
c y a c) O y r C)
IA N 4. _? fn M O N O
¦
rah v:'I. • f• ¦ ?w
r ti ;
y? i ?¦ a s• c f r•
t k
a
2
CD
CF
MI
Or
Of
7 v-4 -
V

f
Ph
Q)
9 ! 4
r 'r •
f 11
a AV
i

yr? ,
'
r
•
t r 9rE • ? r? c f
a
•T
1
o ,
`
V s • •
s W ce)

33
SEE 58EET N0.11
-L
U ?A,III+00 j4, s
MATCH NE 00o E 6
LN
SR iK7 -Yll- / I I L- I I _'
A own;? ? ???< f 'I '
Jill
n °?
vo, W\__ razz ?- nn ?;, 4ml$6
? 4.U A/RA AR. } ?„ u, n 1 _ 8 8_ - . I jtl ` u 2
-1•
o b s `? a L n I_ 1;
Un [
H
r a o:z ?`.r i yy•?1 a I I 2
I`-' \o, i ^'p .,- ?mb ASN 80? Po m
1 4 O n "vrm?'a O I 5.
5;
031 {A ? I ?_
?O ?1 ?J °O 74 `? aH17-1? t
2 P. S
t a1 In1' a ,
r
I r t? r ? ? I
O (?
= 4'4i J.. R A=NPOo$ a f ? N,1/ ?A? ? S"i?
?.' - 7 ?. \?? `ryo •`p1 ,1 (? 5? /5..44/'/ ?j c:
j Poor-,v \f?ti >+ i f/( 4 / oy3f9 I V\
?I _.ti- „?? \~?9i cniri\ 88 J / 56y A;
^ rt- r11 , q, z
am` xno-mac, 8?. ?/ 1 /+ /? /, ass
a ?? yv 8p a / .1, 1
Ll 7" B,V«
\? ggb Z, / ? 1?? / ? / 18Mg8 I ,
, Pg / / / ?8 rn i t
/
$88 pA o\9 / imN
1.0
y / r + + f 110 8$3 m I
y / j Q 8? g ,,I ??a P3
r / S " 8 I\ ea
'S; zi4
µ/ N P ?° mD Vi i O
- y•
I _ oby H r
Sso
'o e ? ti^r ?; « ?`s?. o \ •? \+ -i a ?, C1
a
,? % rya lay =? "Iluuuuuu??
-..:?' "„? ? I '' `'?? °?-?• Fyn
rte- fi3g °cn:!o :u -trop a
'S ' ?? aT11O
Y it II
4 4
s y /
it II Q I /
A L",
71
k,j It It 11
PTSfo. 24+51.96
_,

s
a
?. V
a
nl_ U 77.00 46.0,_ I g t
?J r
w? S = `€t4Rw s,
-1 I:IV ,Y M: ?-- ¦?
[« t .ool ? I ?,6 JL N r 3 ,s
3 3 n7 x l'?
Sli
rr r ° cni -
vm?'"iOF?, JI? ?? O
o<?° 3 c l o
---------------------------------
I g i=
117
Jr 1?- ?
I °rv? 8 [,? fJ Orv, ~V1 T
Wa4l ?._ ZO m 115 o?
Y^ p am o
In' r? ? I ? -$ 111111 S I p' 'I
I75'TRwvsrTION
+ i 1
IT E/ EJ
. n ? 1 m _y
• iN
_?
;
I ? nay?al,cr I 8 ? 8
S? ? O
` P
+,g S+ yy7 88 m m P _
s ?V o zz I
lp I1F _ a1 __
ZZ :2t
I
rr" Sri r NO 00
aaA , b. L(A A?
I u °O
I m8n y .rn `Ul ?.,
,y o
I SCSta. 119+3393 'mp: J?? 2 °?
Tim _,f i [o+'+ \ EOD t?I = ? ?1
lf. .,r I o 4 p N 0
a -0 -0
r r; r N888 m?i 120 I I'S tn I
-., Pg p\ ??OJI
_ 'SI 4 II-II_
acids
r
ro O O g+ u u u u II u Y
M 9 W IV Q? 0
o I?1 }(t??x' c..,
,may o \ ?.. N
l 1 to y
` 21 r---??? II it
II II
r?
t, N o
8P8
?ar1 ?vz 4?.ON
N1 d" Hr ?.? v, ?IJI .' •
Z .
g _-
om pp? P
O f' i
= a
2
a ® _= O$ STaI Ijc)13 ? o
5EE gn 3 g? i
t ? p D
°t f
a mz
o c = ;.
wD?, 4?
(D
3r 2
0y s,