20001434 Ver 1_Monitoring Report 6_20090521

Price Park

Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 291
Monitoring Year - 06
2008
Submitted to:
NCEFT

;,
o? k
PROGRAM E7,c, •? A ???
Ser\ice ('en1652 Mail le?r. Raleigh. N('2-/'09() y ?9s . rr;
March 2009
Monitoring Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: aspiller(a)kci.com
Design Firm
EARTH TECH I AECOM
701 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................1
1.1 Project Objectives .........................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach ......................................................1
1.3 Location and Setting .....................................................................................................1
1.4 Project History and Background ...................................................................................1
1.5 Monitoring Plan View ...................................................................................................5
2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS ....................................7
2.1 Vegetation Assessment .................................................................................................7
2.2. Stream Assessment .......................................................................................................8
2.2.1 Bankfull Event and Stability Assessment .............................................................9
2.2.2 Stability Assessment Table ...................................................................................9
2.2.3 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables ............................................................10
3.0 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................14
4.0 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................14
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Project Restoration Components ...................................... 1
Table 2 ....................................
Project Activit
and R
ti
Hi
.
Table 3. y
epor
ng
story ...............................................................
Project Contact Table 3

Table 4 ...........................................................................................
Project Back
round T
bl 3
.
Table 5. g
a
e ....................................................................................
Verification of Bankfull Events 4

Table 6 ...........................................................................
BEHI and Sediment E
t E
ti 9
.
Table 7. xpor
s
mates .................................................................
Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment 9
.................................... 9
Table 8. Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary .................................................. 10
Table 9. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary .............................................. 1 l
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................2
Figure 2. Monitoring Plan View ..........................................................................................5
APPENDIX A - VEGETATION DATA
Al. Vegetation Data Tables ....................................................................................................16
A2. Representative Vegetation Problem Area Photos ............................................................18
A3. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .................................................................................19
Price Park KC]Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
APPENDIX B - GEOMORPHOLOGIC DATA
B l. Representative Stream Problem Area Photos .................................................................. 24
B2. Stream Photo Stations ...................................................................................................... 27
B3. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment Table ................................................................ 33
B4. Cross-Section Plots .......................................................................................................... 34
B5. Longitudinal Plots ............................................................................................................ 39
B6. Pebble Count Plots ........................................................................................................... 41
APPENDIX C - CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
C1. Current Conditions Plan View .........................................................................................48
Price Park KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program identified UT to Horsepen Creek in Price Park
in Greensboro, North Carolina as a restoration project in 2000. In the past, this project has been
referred to as UT to Horsepen Creek, Price Park and the Jefferson Pilot stream. Henceforth this
project will be referred to as the Price Park project. The approximately 1.0-square mile watershed
is located within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020002 in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin. The
project restored 1,436 linear feet of incised, channelized stream to 1,776 feet of sinuous channel.
The restoration was designed to correct various problems with the existing stream corridor
including unstable channel configuration, minimal bed features, and poor stream and riparian
• habitat. The restoration plan was completed in October 2000 and called for correcting these
i problems by stabilizing stream banks, installing in-stream structures, adjusting the stream
planform, and replanting the riparian areas with native vegetation. Project construction occurred
in 2001 with additional maintenance construction occurring in February 2002 when additional
. structures were installed. While 2008 is the seventh year since construction was completed,
monitoring was not conducted at the site in 2006. In 2007 morphological monitoring was
• completed, but a formal monitoring report was not prepared. This report describes the findings of
• the sixth year of monitoring that took place in 2008.
The Price Park vegetation monitoring has utilized three different methods throughout the
monitoring period. The vegetation monitoring was originally conducted utilizing transects that
ran perpendicular to the stream. These were monitored for the baseline conditions and during the
first year of monitoring. The second year of monitoring established five square vegetation plots.
These plots were monitored in the second, third, and fourth years of monitoring. In monitoring
year 05, eight 10x10 meter vegetation monitoring plots were established. Where feasible, the new
plots overlapped the approximate areas of the plots established in monitoring year 02. In
monitoring years 05 and 06, the new plots were monitored utilizing the CVS vegetation
monitoring protocol. In the years since planting, there have been many volunteer stems that have
populated the conservation easement. Differentiating between volunteers and planted trees was
difficult, but best efforts were made to do so. From these monitoring plots, a site average of 202
planted stems/acre was calculated in monitoring year 06. Monitoring year 06 also counted
volunteer stems as part of the Level 2 vegetation monitoring. While the site has substantial buffer
acreage and lateral extent for an urban setting, the planted stem survivorship in year-6 as
determined by the vegetation plots is yielding a stem density of 202 stems/acre, approximately
75% of the 260 stems/acre, year-5 criterion. The site also has a substantial volunteer population
comprised mainly of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), eastern red
cedar (Juniperus virginiana), and tulip poplar (Lirodendron tulipifera) adding to the stem density
substantially to just over 2,000 stems/acre. The most prolific exotic invasive species at the site is
kudzu (Pueraria montana), which already covers a large part of the easement and should be
controlled as soon as possible.
Previous monitoring of the project channel revealed some significant areas of bank instability.
Observations in monitoring year 6 found many of these same areas of erosion. A total of 7% of
bank footage exhibited some state of erosion during the projects history, but most of these
demonstrated little advancement after their initial appearance. Most of these are described as
moderate, with the exception of a serious instance of outright widening near a failed structure at
station 4+00. Many that were previously demonstrating active erosion have begun to stabilize
with vegetation or have become stable over time as the banks were reshaped. This reshaping
came mainly in the form of bench expansion in most cases, meaning the upper section of bank in
some riffle sections scoured, increasing the area of the bench feature. Some of these areas still
need to re-vegetate. Although some of the structures placement and construction were not ideal
in terms of more recent practice and understanding, 85% within the reach are maintaining full
grade control with a single structure exhibiting outright failure. The placement of some of these
Price Park KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
structures has limited some of the intended riffle habitat, while adding more discrete functional
pool features. There has been evidence of degradational stress in between grade control points on
the bed at various times in the projects history, but currently the bed footage exhibiting some Amok
form of degradation is estimated at only 3%. The profile has varied vertically over time with the
bulk of this appearing to represent movement of bedload through the system, although the section
between stations 2+00 and 5+00 appears to have exhibited some downcut after construction. This
however does not appear to have advanced over the last 3-4 years since its initial occurrence
earlier in the projects history and the water surface and bankfull slopes are nearly identical as
measured in 2008 and very close to those measured at the As-built stage. While the site has gone •
through some adjustments after construction, it appears that the site is exhibiting a stabilizing
trend with the continued advancement of the vegetation, although the latter will benefit from the
aforementioned planting augmentation and invasive control. i
i
L__ -A
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 - Final _
w
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Project Objectives
The goals and objectives of this project are as follows:
• Provide a stable stream channel that neither aggrades nor degrades, while maintaining its
dimension, pattern, and profile with the capacity to transport its watershed's water and
sediment load.
• Reconnect the stream with its floodplain.
• Improve aquatic habitat with the use of natural material stabilization structures such as
root wads, rock vanes, woody debris and a riparian buffer.
• Provide wildlife habitat and bank stability through the creation of a riparian zone.
• Incorporate the existing greenway plan into the stream restoration plan.
1.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
A previously incised channel, UT to Horsepen Creek, was restored using channel dimension,
pattern, and profile modifications and the establishment of a vegetated riparian zone adjacent to
the stream. The Priority I restoration involved converting the 1,436 ft straightened channel into a
sinuous channel that meanders for a total of 1,776 ft. Cross vanes and root wads were
incorporated for aquatic habitat enhancement and bed and bank stability. A 50-foot riparian
buffer on either side of the stream was planted with native vegetation. In addition, an aerial
sanitary sewer line was re-aligned to be perpendicular to the stream flow and a gas line was
rerouted under the stream channel.
1.3 Location and Setting
The Unnamed Tributary to Horsepen Creek is located in Price Park within the city limits of
Greensboro, North Carolina. The 1.0-square mile watershed has a park setting with Jefferson
Elementary located to the west, Price Park to the east, and Guilford College to the south of the
site. There is moderate potential for future development.
1.4 Project History and Background
Table 1. Project Restoration Components
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
w
on w y
f?

• C
C. 0
CL
[
Segment/ Reach ID w a H Q Stationin Comment
UT to Horse en Creek N/A R P1 1,776 0+00 - 16+46
wa viaivii r 1 - rl IUI ILA' 1
Price Park KCI Associates oj'North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 1 2008 - MY06 - Final
DIRECTIONS TO PRICE PARK SITE:
From Interstate 40, take Exit 213 (Guilford College
Road) North. Follow Guilford College Road past
W. Friendly Avenue. where Guilford College Road
becomes New Garden Road. Continue on New
Garden Road and stay right at the Fleming Road
and New Garden Road 'Y' intersection. Continue
on New Garden Road for approximately 300 yards.
Turn right on Hobbs Road. The road bisects the
project stream at the bottom of the hill.
V
p I Hobbs FA
New C3arden U.
Project Location
P
o ,e
0
0
Friendly Ave.
Guilford College R&
p
Market St o
0
vp
e
Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map
Price Park, Guilford County, EEP Project # 291
r, N
?tem 0.250.125 o 0.25 o.s
Males W +E KCI
', aI 'eIlleut
PROGRAM S `SOCIATFS OF NC

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
Activity or Report Data Collection
Complete Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan N/A N/A
Mitigation Plan 2000 Dec-00
Construction 2001 Aug-01
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area 2001 Feb-02
As-Built report 2002 June-02
Permanent seed mix applied to reach 2001 Aug-01
Containerized and B&B plantings for reach Jan-02 Jan-02
Structural maintenance Bank Grading) Jan-04 Jan-04
Supplemental planting of containerized material Jan-04 Jan-04
Year I Monitoring Aug-02 Aug-02
Year 2 Monitoring Aug-03 Aug-03
Year 3 Monitoring Aug-04 Aug-04
Year 4 Monitoring Aug-05 Aug-05
Year 5 Monitorin ** Jul-07* Nov-07
Year 6 Monitoring Oct-08 Jan-09
TiNO monitoring was conauctea to 2uu6
**Data collected but not submitted in an annual monitoring report in 2007
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
Design Firm Earth Tech of North Carolina, Inc.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Contact: Ron Johnson
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor SEI Environmental, INC.
5100 North I-85, Suite 7
Charolette, NC 28206
Phone: [phone]
Repair Contractor North State Environmental Inc.
2889 Lowery Street, Suite B
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Contact: Darrell Westmoreland
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performer Earth Tech of North Carolina, Inc.
As-Built Report and MY-01 701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
Monitoring Performer Biological & Agricultural Engineering
MY-02, 03, 04 North Carolina State University
Campus Box 7625
Raleigh, NC 27695
Contact: Dan Clinton
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performer KCI Associates of North Carolina
MY-06,07 4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
3
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 - Final
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
Project County Guilford County
Drainage Area 1.0 s q. miles
Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate Estimated at >10%
Stream Order 1 st order
Ph sio a hic Region Piedmont
Ecore ion Southern Outer Piedmont 45b
Ros en Classification of As-built E-Stream Type
Dominant Soil Types N/A*
Reference Site ID N/A*
USGS ITUC for Project and Reference 03030002
NCDW Sub-basin for Project and Reference 03-06-02
NCDWQ Classification for Project and Reference C
An portion of the project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment? No
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor N/A
% of Project Easement Fenced 0% EMI
*Historical project documents necessary to provide these data were unavailame at the time of repon suomission
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
4
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 - Final
SNOISIA38 -
' OZ+Ol NOIlb'1S 0100+00 NOIl'd1S
D
r 6091Z VNIl0i1V0 H1210N
H0131V21
aV08 sMod x1slo9c 90AIN- l6Z U381NnN 103rO8d d33 § C
z w
' l r
Q0 cr
> ?
SISILN310S • S83NNVld • S833NION3 VNI108VO H1aON
uNnoO aao3lln o m W 0
~ Z
ON 10 S31V100$SV
r >133a0 N3d3S'dOH Ol in 0 w
= N o g
?
I ?
J Il Ma )WVd 30Rid a
, a N
0
0

°v LU
J
V
Vl
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2 V

I I
I
? S
Qa
d
t
li
,
I

U)
U) U)
U)
(D
LLJ
z
0
LL
z

-j

ca
U)
w
-j
l o s s e s
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••?•••••s?
2.0 PROJECT CONDITIONS AND MONITORING RESULTS
lions, 2.1 Vegetation Assessment
The Price Park vegetation monitoring has utilized three different methods throughout the
monitoring period. The vegetation monitoring was originally conducted utilizing transects that
ran perpendicular to the stream. These were monitored for the baseline conditions and during the
- first year monitoring. The second year of monitoring established five square vegetation plots.
. These plots were monitored in the second, third, and fourth years of monitoring. In monitoring
year 05, eight 10x10 meter vegetation monitoring plots were established. Where feasible, the new
. plots overlapped the approximate areas of the plots established in monitoring year 02. In
• monitoring years 05 and 06, the new plots were monitored utilizing the CVS vegetation
monitoring protocol. In the years since planting, there have been many volunteer stems that have
populated the conservation easement. Differentiating between volunteers and planted trees was
• difficult, but best efforts were made to do so. From these monitoring plots, a site average of 202
planted stems/acre was calculated in monitoring year 06. The four plots representing the upper
60% of the project above the Jefferson Club Road bridge yielded an average planted stem density
of 320 stems per acre in monitoring year 6, while the area below this bridge demonstrated planted
stem densities of approximately 80 stems/acre. This zone will benefit from planting augmentation
and possibly a jurisdictional delineation for a wetland feature of some apparent quality for the
- lower 200 feet of the project on stream right. The impacts to the vegetation counts were
concentrated in this area primarily because of the repeated beaver activity. EEP's wildlife control
contractor removed beaver on two occasions and broke the dam at the lower culvert, but remnant
- material was used by beaver that recolonized the site and re-established the dam. EEP has
informed KCI that another removal effort was scheduled for earlier this year. Monitoring year 06
also counted volunteer stems as part of the Level 2 vegetation monitoring. The most numerous
. volunteer species included green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda),
eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The data from
the sixth year of monitoring revealed that only two of the eight monitoring plots contained
. enough palnted trees to be consistent with the 260 planted stems/acre vegetation success criterion.
• However, including volunteer trees all but two plots had greater than 260 stems/acre and the site
average is 2,033 total stems/acre.
•
The most prolific of the site's exotic invasive species is kudzu (Pueraria montana), which
already covers a large part of the easement and should be controlled as soon as possible. The
• other invasive species that are present in the project area include: Japanese honeysuckle
• (Lonicera japonica), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiora),
elaeagnus (Elaegnus sp.), mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), oriental bittersweet (Celastrus
- orbiculatus), Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), and
• microstegium (Microstegium vimineum). It is recommended that a site assessment for replanting
be conducted and that an aggressive invasive species control program be implemented.

- See vegetation data and photos in Appendix A and Current Conditions Plan View in Appendix C.
The taxonomic standard being used for vegetation identifications is "Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas by Alan S. Weakley.
Price Park KC/Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 7 2008 - MY06 - Final
2.2. Stream Assessment
Previous monitoring of the project channel revealed some significant areas of bank instability.
Observations in monitoring year 6 found many of these same areas of erosion. A total of 7% of
bank footage exhibited some state of erosion during the projects history, but most of these
demonstrated little advancement after their initial appearance. Most of these are described as
moderate, with the exception of a serious instance of outright widening near a failed structure at
approximately Station 4+00. Many that were previously demonstrating active erosion have
begun to stabilize with vegetation or have become stable over time as the banks were reshaped.
In many cases eroded banks can stabilize over time. This can happen as banks become undercut
and then the eventual slumping deposits the vegetated tops of the banks on the toe of the bank.
The result is a bank with a protected toe and a new, more stable and less steep bank. Raw, eroded
banks can also stabilize over time as vegetation grows on them even without slumping. Both of
these natural methods of bank stabilization are occurring along many banks at the Price Park site.
This is apparent throughout the site where the lower portions of the bank are well vegetated, but
the top half of the bank is unvegetated and in some cases still prone to erosion at higher flows. In
most places, the banks at Price Park are vertical, because the toe of bank has eroded away.
However, in some cases these banks have stabilized. An additional year of monitoring will
indicate whether the currently eroding banks are able to stabilize over time. The bank erosion
areas of immediate concern are the ones that still, seven years after construction, do not have
vegetation established on them. These areas can be seen in the Current Conditions Plan View.
The stream is vertically controlled in some places by the cross vanes that are still functioning and
bedrock. There are some apparent areas of stream bed degradation, but most of these areas are no
longer worsening. While the bed features are present throughout the stream, they are not in a
consistent riffle-pool sequence, but the bed exhibits a more diverse and faceted nature than the as-
built profile exhibits. The beaver dam at the downstream limits of the project stream is
backwatering the lower portion of the stream, which is described in the Current Conditions Plan
View.
The Monitoring Plan View illustrates how the existing cross vanes are located at the beginning of
tangent sections (heads of riffles) on the stream planform. A typical cross vane should
concentrate flow in the center of the channel and induce scour to help maintain pools. The arms
should also slow water in the near bank region before redirecting it. At Price Park the placement
of some of the structures in the lowest extent of meanders combined with short riffles was not
ideal in terms of more recent practice and understanding and this has resulted in the conversion of
some intended riffle habitat into pools. The cross vanes on the project stream act as grade control
structures, but also promote the formation of pools where riffles should be beginning. The
installed cross vane arms do not angle out away from the center boulder. Instead of directing
water away from the banks, the vane arms act as large stone toe bank protection. Because of their
placement, the cross vanes have been evaluated primarily as grade control measures and stone toe
stabilization, in which case most are functional. Root wads, which are the other structures at the
site, are only marginally functional. While they are still providing stream and terrestrial habitat,
many of them are positioned above the streams baseflow and are beginning to rot. Certain
degrading root wads then cause the surrounding stabilizing boulders to become displaced in some
instances. In some places the root material is rotted away entirely and the root wads are hard to
find.
See additional stream assessment and photos in Appendix B and Current Conditions Plan View in
Appendix C.
Price Park KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 g 2008 - MY06 - Final
2.2.1 Bankfull Event and Stability Assessment
2.2.1.a Verification of Bankfull Events Table
Table 5. Verification of Bankfull Events
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
Date of Data Date of
Method Photo Number
Collection Occurrence
7/25/2008 6/30/2008 Crest Gauge N/A
8/27/2008 Tropical Storm Fa N/A
2.2.1.b BEHI and Sediment Export Table
Table 6. BEHI and Sediment Export Estimates
Project Number and Name: 291- Price Park
N/A
Please note that the pool feature in Table 7 has a rating above 100%. This occurs when there are
more pools identified in the longitudinal profile survey for that monitoring year than were
originally counted during the as-built survey.
Price Park KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 9 2008 - MY06 - Final
2.2.2 Stability Assessment Table
? ? ? .-+ V'I M 00

M N M r- vn
iE

M 00 l?

Q

? M '? 00 N N Q1

O O !ti 00 O M
C 0 00
?•
?*, M
N
?'
O
A G", ? ? O v? M N
? M N M 00 ?
?O O -• ?
?Oi ?O N .
kn 00
O Vl l
?O -
m .?
w.

CO 00 ?o N ?O

U ?
N
O
?'
??
O
[?
M
N M
Pr -t 1 01 -1 oo M
r- kn
C G v V
Ili , l M
l? N M 00
O
[
O - N 00 N r-: 00
N
W O N A (N N

? U
p" 00 ?c N N

b

U ?
?
o c
?.
bb

t
4
nN U k -I
U
? ? V]
F ro ^^
I? ? ? ?

N ?+ v7

C? pa O U f? C
s.
a? C ,.
C

M
N
N
M
M 00
O
p kn
W
O
N
N 00
O
N
L?
OO
M M
~ N 01 O1
M N ? N N
O O

o DO
00
M
c
O
W
O

O ?

b
3
° by
o
b
o O W
b 00 y aoi a?i C N
r-L 0
a
i i
o a 0
E

o n En
W U ? ,, o
? a?
r i °? ? ? w
?, 3 b a a w
o v a`?i U Qn
u
a 3
?,
o
.o ?
U b
2
O O
O
Q
U
O
2
O
a
zrt
v?
C W
a o
o ri
L
CC
O
bA
O
i.
v f1.
? i
L e-N
x
b ?
?z
o°
o. E
0
?z
? •L
H ?
Oi M - ? M O\ '? O\ O ? ? iE •IE iE •k iF •% dF ao- jF

•IF
N O *

N
to
N
*
*
"
* •x-
* at
* iF
9F
* M•
*
iE
9F

N >" 00 N v'? a0 * M N M Oo

' M
Pte N N p N M-i .l`- n M N M 00 ^
- Z F

U
O
N
.:
01
O
l-
?p CID
O
N
N
?:
M
•-•
r
N
M
V M N M 00 O
'
N d o, M N M 00

p
Oi
N vt¢
.,
M
O
l?
M
O
N
N
.--?
N
N
M
D1
N N O\ O M N M 00 O ?O

?O
O
O
O
p
\O
D1 0 0
N \O
Oi
O
p
00
"o

N

O

l?

p

N
O '""' O "! p ?p O O O p N p 00 O O O
M N
?"
N
O
,,,_,
M
V
O
M

O .-. O? v7 O O? l? O d. p 00 `O

O
.
N
4E
M
9 p
_
N
A M N 00 n N 00 V]
^. N N M (? O 00
y
O0 N O
M N O cmn N M O N

O
00
[? 9
a
O
i
O
O
M
O
en 00 rr
??
en 1-:
00

03 'L"' J'"'"
o
3 3 ? Q Q ?? .?.?? b
O ? ? O nn
C U ?' a
Q CL p b it N
i

ca
o
J
? F
r

0

L
C

Q ?
?

? It
3 3 ¢ Q Q

C C 'b y0, Q O

U ?
x

y co

b
w
a
2
0 0
0
y N
O
U
0
U
N
a
a
a ?
.o
r
U o
N
2
0 0
0
y N
Q
U
O
h
h
ti
U

M. N
s] c
it o
N U
Ll. U
b ?
U rn
>N O
O U
3 .b
c o
o ?
U y
U ?
o ?
U 'b
? U
cd
O ?-
ti
O O
3 z
N
a
N
? o
? 0.
? 0.
0. ?

00 IC kn CA c

N
as
?y
?O
00
N
l-

r
N

M N
V•1
C
00
A

?
M

? N
C

p

W
O N c
y O M - ,
p

O
00

O
O O
\O N D1 7 fn 00 N 00 r- M
o z W

00 O? V'1

kn
Q)

F
"C
00

? 00
kn
M
In
M
O
O O
Cl M 00 00 00 00 r-- M °

V'1 N ,? M DO ° --?
O

N
?
o Q1
kn
N
1.0
O
O O
N
M
.~
O O
M
°
M ?'
a0
M ?O

[
M ?
O -0F
Q'
V)
O O? O? N a0

o N Cl

z
W
o
0o
M
O
'" N N N a, ° N M
O
N
O
O
00
O
Q
C? 00

i,
rn
•--?
M N
7
C ^ O ? ? ? '? N

O O
C
00
00 rn °' 00
00
M `- N
8 #
W
0 C

^O a

1r? _
fir'
-•
+''
.O
rn
?+

?
s
O ''?'
L
L'A
U
O
s.
O
N
O
L
N
O
N
?"
U

o
v CZ3 ?
C3 > o
8 a ? (U
?
0
C.) z
3
z
c, 1 a O
w v y
H a a a Q?
.o w
b
x
2
O
pN
Q
U
0
U
M
a
N
A
4 i
0. W
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The CVS-EEP protocol (http:i/cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from
PricePark this year, the sixth year of monitoring. This methodology was incorporated during the fifth
year of monitoring. The method used before that time was the EEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol.
4.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
Weakley, Alan S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas.
(httD://www.herbarium.uiic.edu/FloraArclilves/WeaklevFlora 2006-Jan.ndf)
Price Park 14 KCl Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
Appendix A
Vegetation Data
Price Park 15 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
Al - Vegetation Data Tables
Table Al. Vegetation Metadata
Project Number and Name: 291- Price Park
Report Prepared By Brian Roberts
Date Prepared 8/15/2008 14:21
Database Name kci-problem-II-fixed.mdb
Database Location M:\2007\12071067_2007 EEP OPEN END\Veg_database
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Project Length Stream-to-Edge Required Plots Sampled
Code Name Description ft Width ft Area (sq m) calculated Plots
291 Price Park Stream Restoration site in 1,776 80 26,397 8 8
Greensboro NC
Table A3. Vegetation Damage by Species
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
F?
O

Y i ?

a: ?
U ? ?
A C> ?
Q
L u C
y

Alnus serrulata 2 2

Car inus caroliniana 5 5
Cornus amomum 4 2 1 1
Dios ros vir iniana 5 5
Fraxinus enn lvanica 10 6 1 3
uercus falcata 2 2
uercus michauxii 8 8
uercus hellos 4 3 1
TOT: 8 40 33 2 2 3
Price Park 16 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06- Final
Table A4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
a
0

L ?

PP-A-0001-year: 6 13 10 3
PP-A-0002- ear:6 6 4 1 1
PP-A-0003- ear:6 4 4
PP-A-0004- ear:6 9 7 1 1
PP-A-0005- ear:6 3 3
PP-A-0006- ear:6 1 1
PP-A-0007- ear:6 1 1
PP-A-0008- ear:6 3 3
TOT: 8 40 33 2 2 3
Table A5. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
If! 'R Io Io 11o 11o Io If!
h
8
03
0
M

'? 0 0 IT 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
y
E 1 1 1
Q 1 1 1 1 1
Q
a y ? a a a a.a a dy o: a:
c 0. a a 0. a a. a a
a c p, ? ? o 0 0 0 0 0 0
v? F ? R a O, O. a a a CL O,
Alnus serrulata 2 1 2 2
Car inus caroliniana 5 3 1.67 1 3 1
Cornus amomum 4 2 2 1 3
Dios ros vir iniana 5 4 1.25 1 1 1 2
Fraxinus enns Ivanica 10 3 3.33 7 2 1
uercus alcata 2 1 2 2
uercus michauxii 8 4 2 2 1 2 3
uercus hellos 4 4 1 1 1 1 1
TOT: 8 13 6 4 9 3 1 1 3
Table A6. Vegetative Problem Areas
Project Number and Name: 291- Price Park (UT to Horsepen Creek)
Se ment/Reach: Ut to Horse en Creek (1,758 ft.
Feature/Issue Station # / Range Probable Cause Photo #
Invasive Vegetation 00+30 -00+60 Kudzu VP 1
11+00 -11+60 Kudzu
Price Park 17 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
VP 1 - Mimosa (Albrizia julibrissin) and kudzu (Pueraria montana). Photo taken near Station 3+50. 10/29/08 -
MY 06

VP2 -'Thorny olive (Elaeagnus pungens) along stream bank. Photo taken near Station 5+50. 10/29/08 - MY 06
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
18
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 MY06 Final
A2 - Representative Vegetation Problem Area Photos
A3 - Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
-? 7
• _ 5

/ t ~
Q

s. r
77 T
ti t' 4
11 1 if
,R,,
•t r
,.w S
-y: > 1;
Vegetation Plot 1 - Taken looking southeast toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
Vegetation Plot 2 - Taken looking northeast toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
Price Park 19 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - W06 - Final
Vegetation Plot 3 - Taken looking east toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
Vegetation Plot 4 - Taken looking east toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
Price Park 20 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
Are R 1-? 1r

Vegetation Plot 5 - Taken looking south toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06

¦
n 77/?!? *o- is tr{.• i.
• ?,
44
! / \r ' A,'
L\ tN
\ ANN a I L . d bK ?t l??i'
???'?,?,? c? w,??4,a?/,?77...r.M' c?.? ?r?,,? ?P i ! ?illf ?tcZ ..i? l?r ?.i.s Y?iel?:'i.? t ?,
. lq `• t 1 t . ? t ai3'
• ?' ? ?1 -5, 4v1 f1 ?:14
4v 4 , i M1' P ? '' ?' 7 P " v \ r i 1''y?$, 3k „+Y j., ,s qq? i
?x}\
= s • a « 4 Pl7i^p t f' t?1 tip; d a J!'??itl
iq'
Vegetation Plot 6 - Taken looking east toward the center of the plot trom the origin. 25/ 14/ux - MY ub
Price Park 21 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
?? 1. '? dru yy? * 1eY
e : { 2 a{ M L
??u w 9 ??? Y ! ?' fZ
w h { ** m
t JF irv r"R ei I kt
, '«. 2 .? `•H r? 1 {i ;. 1 { 1' fir r py,?V i
11 "emu` a !i? i A,• i
Al.
t
?' yE ,tai
"°?
3 y
lie
Al 4
Vegetation Plot 7 - Taken looking northeast toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
i .F r.A%I '? ?Tt w it '
n
a
f`
£^O
i'•Ja "i y T C,'ii'.4`e f
` yyam"$ 4,
Vegetation Plot 8 - Taken looking south toward the center of the plot from the origin. 8/14/08 - MY 06
Price Park 22 KCI Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
Appendix B
Geomorphologic Data
Price Park 23 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
B1- Representative Stream Problem Area Photos
SP 1 - Severe bank erosion. Photo taken near Station 4+00 (XS 1). 10/29/08 - MY 06
SP2 - Upper bank erosion. Photo taken near Station 5+00. 10/29/08 - MY 06

Price Park 24 KCLAssociates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 Final
SP3 - Root wads completely above baseflow, rotting, and with scour behind. Photo taken near Station 9+00.
10/29/08 - MY 06
SP4 - Failed cross vane. Photo taken near Station 4+00. 11/5/08 - MY 06
Price Park 25 KCI Associates o/ North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06 - Final
SP5 - Beaver dam causing backwater conditions to Station 13+60. Photo taken near Station 17+50. 10/29/08 -
MY 06
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
26
KC1 Associates of North Carolina
2008 - AIYO6 - Final
Appendix B2 -Stream Photo Stations
M1-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
•?'? .fir, v ?. qN,
M2-US - MY06 - 11/5/08

M3-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
?a

r .•
a
, Ya .
.
?
??

y'?
'
? ?Ky.: it a• O
1!?'. .?'?ky
j
' r
M1-DSM1DS - MY066 - 11/5/08
` r
03
,..@f. .
M2-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M3-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
27 KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 - Final

I
M4-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M5-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M6-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
M4-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M5-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M6-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
28 KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 -Final
M7-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M8-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
tia? t
M9-US - MY06 - 11 /5/08
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
Y

WOW

: Fri,- ?- . • 3-
M7-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M8-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M9-DS - MY06 11/5/08
29 KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - W06 - Final
M10-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 1 1-US - MY06 - 1 1 /5/08
Price Park
EEP Project # 29i
M 10-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 12-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
30 KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 Final
M12-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 11-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M13-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 14-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 15-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
M13-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 14-DS - MY06 - 1 1 /5/08
M15-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
31 KCLAssociates of North Carolina
1008 - MY06 - Final
1
AIM
s
Price Park
EEP Project # 291
M 16-US - MY06 - 11/5/08
32
M 16-DS - MY06 - 11/5/08
M 17-DS - MY06 - 11 /5/08
KCI Associates of North Carolina
2008 - MY06 - Final
M 17-US - MY06 - 1 1 /5/08
B3 -Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment Table
Table 131. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Proiect Number and Name: 291 - Price Park
Feature
Category Metric (per As-built and reference baselines)
Riffles L Present?
2. Armor stable (e.g. no displacement)?
3. Facet grade appears stable?
4. Minimal evidence of embedding/fining?
5. Length appropriate?
Pools L Present? (e.g. no severe aggradation)
2. Sufficiently deep (Dmax pool:Mean Bkf> 1.6?)
3. Length appropriate?
Thalweg 1. Upstream of meander bend centering?
2. Downstream of meander centering?
Meanders
1. Outer bend in state of limited/controlled erosion?
2. Of those eroding, # w/ concomitant point bar
formation.
3. Apparent Re within spec?
4. Sufficient floodplain access and relief?
Bed General I LGeneral channel bed aggradation areas (bar
2. Channel bed degradation - areas of mcreasm
down cutting or head cutting?
F. Bank 1. Actively eroding, wasting, or slumping bank
G. Vanes 1. Free of back or arm scour?
2. Height appropriate?
3. Angle and geometry appear appropriate?
4. Free of piping or other structural failures?
11. Wads / l . Free of scour?
(# Stable)
Number
Performing
as Intended

Total Number
per As-built *
Total Number/
feet in unstable
state
% Perform.
in Stable
Condition
Feature
Perform. M
or Total
10 17 N/A 59%
10 17 N/A 59%
10 17 N/A 59%
10 17 N/A 59%
10 17 N/A 59% 59%
21 18 N/A 117%
21 18 N/A 117%
21 18 N/A 117% 117%
12 17 N/A 71%
14 17 N/A 82% 77%
II 17 N/A 65%
0 6 N/A 0%
17 17 N/A 100%
17 17 N/A 100% 66%
N/A N/A 1/15 99%
N/A N/A 3/90 95% 97%
N/A N/A 18/240 93% 93%
II 13 N/A 85%
II 13 N/A 85%
0 13 N/A 0%
11 13 N/A 85% 64%
10 13 N/A 77%
10 13 N/A 77% 77%
* Total number of features per as-built estimated from planview sheets.
Price Park 33 KCI Associates of North Carolinu
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06- Final
II
w
00

? O

? C

N N

O O

n
?0
V
O
M
O
?G
?
n
O
.--
w
Q O

4

Q C y
?

"

L d
d
=
b
C
?
?

?
F
a
C
D E C ,? d 3 ? m G C
z w ? 3 = ? y y s ?
_ o 0
? p c o o e se ? q .?. a

? N
N O M h o0
am
1 y
,
O O 7 V1 O O
d r
1 0 0 n W
N M V V N N
1 ?
O V -? Orn ?D l0 ?D l?
1 ? p^ O •--N M 7 v1 ?D

1 1 b O O O O O O O
O >. >. >y .y. >" >" ?..
t

1
1 I 1
1 1 f ?

1 t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
t
t
1
1
1
1
1
t
t
1
1

?

? `

I
'* 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

?

? '

¦
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1

t
t
1

i

?
?¦

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
t
1
0
0
0
41
O
00
O
t`
O
N
O \'
? O
O
V
O
M
O
N
0
O
0 0 °o rn ? a N
(Iddj) u0?1onaj_7
? r V ?/l ?n N oC B M W O, 7 N N ?D 1? V M O V O N ?O ? V ?0 -? O [? O M O? O??
? M. ?fi ? (? 01 .--.--O !` M O\ 7 ? V ? Gfi --? 00 V M N M O N M '- --? O M OO '-' C1 ?D V
i x x 0r 00 a 0, 00 1? r V V 7 V V M M M M M Vl Vl Vl ?O [? OG 00 00 O O O O
a Q, D` Q` Q\ D, Q, U D, C3, D, a, rn O, D, 0, 0, O, 0, 0'. 0\ a, 0, 0, 0, C\ o, 01 O O O O
lal
O
G O W M W M V O la, c N? M A O 01 C O V -? vl - o ?0 Vl M v)
C ?"'i M 00 M O M v'1 00 O O N V' ?D ?0 1? W D1 N M M M V1 01 N QO
N N N N M M M M M M M M It V 7 V V V 7 "r V 7 I'l, 1/l 00 00

A
M
t
? O

`? ' - y j ?'rt ?A/?t?-ice ?? ?'d O ? o V In o 0

44
b ,
Fr . ?tk

0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'i
k
r
l
??f
i
. ??
r
•
G ? z
t
? _?
? '
1
?
i ?r
,- n.§
p ?
„?,.
?y
?? ? ? i 0
? C l7 1
1fi Q y :l l is-?
.
f?
y
? (? r YP ./
C1
1

'All

e'CY
t
.
J
? J'' j
A
4 ? i 1
t y

c
I+r rl ?
L'

?
r 1
1
? L
CE
'
L7 ' M
GJ '

U '
1
1 C
N
1
1
1
w
s
'
I ,
o
>
c}
G
C
Y 1
1

1 d C L
L 1
O
y ° J N
z
N
O 01
? C, N O O
C
U .^.. N 01 ( 71 C, 011 C, O C
(taa j) uol/nnaj_V
°
C,
,O
C,
,C+
N
r^,
x
,f"i
v
O,
,G
c
,G
c
?!..
V
In
O
Ic
,G
c
N
V

n
M
v
V
v
E

m ?
>
d
W ?
r _
r _
r
r, a
,G
a -
1?
a, o
vl
a C
h v
V
a, C, aT
M
a` N
a`
a`
a` ?
C
a O
C` O
C, v
C
c- O - a
N
C, 1/1
C, .f.
C` 1?
01 r`
C, r
c r`
C71 r
C`
L

t ? y O v. -- r` ? 00 O, V N N 00 N D` N ,f ,C
M
[?
N
O
N
M
M
N
M
Q-
i?

y

Q W

^ V

,? w

--

N

M

r+', M,

V .
7 G

In
Vl
vl
,G
v?
Vl
Vl
?O
r
vl
r
Vl
D,
In
O
,c

,D
N
SJ
N
G
d'
z
,P
O
O
1?
M
r
'D
r
m
o0
N
D`•
C,
O,
a 3 il A A w

7
C r
•S r
f1
R
L
Q O
Q ?

S
L °
m p ? O

Z ?
W
(?
3
C
C
L
?
O
? ?i
L
4. 1 Q ?. C S
t. M
Y
° 4?
Y
C F
Y
C 9

p 'D

0 q

? O

y Q
`
Y
C
s
m
m
m
?.
?
?
?
3
w
m
00
C, 'o 'o c
r, l-7?. ??it..'?Y??,?'t V? "?? ? ?rtTj? 1 ? P`'. o cv ni v vi ?
1 d d o o o o O O o
jr'' ? ^ I 1 1
4 =7 1 I
en 1 1
4 ? 4
" 'All 1,`131 r
.. •f vi ?lT/1 ?? 1 1 1
1 1 Q
1 1 ?
? 1 1
?.CC 1 1 t
w 1 1
L ?
u I
a 1
cd 1 y
/Ca 1 1
U 1 ? 1
0
1 1 (V
1 1
1 1
1 I
1 1
I 1
c
cO 1 ? 1 ?
L
a 1 1
1 1
} 1 1
N
ro ? O ? I 1
Lt C '.,. ? ,D
0 0
cncN o rn It
rn
Uc`X I m
(laafi uolrnnalV
°e
^ N `D Q? ^ ^ V' O? O N N O 00 r 00 O M GC ? IC
°? O Ki 7 N r` 00 !? t` ? v'1 7 V' 7 7 7 7 rn r ?O 7 0•. r ct ?O ? vl 7
7 ?O ?O Vl M M M M N N M M V vl IG z '.G z
^ a d\ O 0\ O U Q? D` a ?• a, O, O\ O` Oll O O Q` Q° Ol
m W
d
L
Ih 40. y 0 b N N t0 1 M - M W M o0 V a,
PE
ii
O oo O ?Ci O ?O ?G N C O
O
L
Q'
O
W
O d ? 'r
F d ? C W O
Q w
T+ ? tq
y •C C
ta N
ps
W CC m
a

•?'
G ?

yY.,
W
W

a°

Qn

?
A

Q

?i
Q

V
O

•'T'
t. C
? C C O O Y! ? t.+ O
? w co w w w ? ? 3 w w?

S 1 I
L 1 i I ?

t 1 1 y v 00
- '-? 1 1 G ` Vl
j
e`4,r?1 it,l pot ,? I Y c y
`p
o o
i 1
1 s?? ?' ? 1 ? 1 1 1
•
+ I I
ll

>,
p
r
r y
r
1
1 1
r u l

". 1 ?t `?Ilw •T ?'?' ad ?? OI 1 1
;At S2 'm

7J?t ? t '
? 1 1
u Q
6. 1 1
5 ? I 1 r
•
y , I 1
Cd
1 1
L 1 1
d
? 1 1 O
L
? 1 I 1
6J ? 1
? 1 1

- 1 1

V. 1 1
O
?`
T 1 1
1
M
1
I
C '? 1 1

a? o L 1 1
u v =
r ri

It O
C= 00
C7,
C7, C,
' In In In v? ? V V V
(/a2/) U0.11ma/v
O ?/, - ^ 7 P ^ K. 0, .--. oG N ,L ?• O` Oc r', t` C C rte, v, vl V ?":
?!. •'? ?! OC r r ,a oc C a, N N ^ In OC O f'1 ^ Q` O ^ O C a` O N
E m? ?aocxocx c`u-ivvv-t at z ococao ocrno-
a, ac C, a, 0 o C c c
a, a, a, Ch C, C
`

h ,
a, C, o, C, a,
a C
r -rv-ItT v vt -It vacav nv v n
W
d
= L
W y' ? L
? U
d •
? O N M z N ?N lcl
? ? G G D` a, r, r N N N N r"M M r'; M N; V V 7 ?/1 vl
? a
+
a3xaaw Vl
,T O ? ? C C V ?_ N C
W
d
L
d
o
r u LS7 t Y = ?
V]
Z a°1i
L b A
m y. ?

?

z
W

w
,,,

?

3

d
=

3
=

r

W
? E

?
=
= 3 G d ? C: u Y
=
G yI?..
Y 4
.
Y F
Y 9 'O Q C ? C
d Y

m m m ? c? ? ? 3 w m
?y6 Y? •?a? 4

A
f AYa.
?.Ik Ipil
,
r i h c t??^.. 9 ?
III

1U ?
I

1 Q

• sw?• L

•
L
p.
^ ? a o r? ry n M o

Q o
o = ? h

Q 'r1
, ?
o ? b r.C p? 0.! D
? w ? 3 g o y t
Q
? -
? -
? -
? L
b L
b
A d
E
o fE
c t
= •d
x
A C C D ma y t". c
? o ? = '
o a
i m ? w ? ? 3 w aa
a
O 'r, ?, ^ In r r` r r o 0o M O o o v, r oo M O ? O, ? M o, ?? 00
•r+ .."? r O oG '7 7 V r ?O M N t` f? O 00 07 W O? O oo ? .--. ? r r C ?
O N -- C O O C O o0 t? t` r Ic AC Irl 00 t` 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
y C O? C C7, 00 x m o0 x x x W 00 00 x O, Qi Q,. O, a, cl
W ?t •Y 7? V e? V 7 a? V V 7 V? V 7?? V V? V 7 V 7 7
D
Z G ? vl O -- O -- r` ?C AG oo M O -O, M -. V1 M r O ?D h O
O O O M O O O N M r LT -- N N M 7 I rn C r N b r
^ N N N N N N N M M M M M M M V t7 V) In vt
c
L
.?i
?i
RS
6J
Q
Cd
U
1.
?
1 1
1 1
1 I ?
t I I Q o 0
V1 N
1 1 C N N
1 Ii O ?c 00

t I Y b O O

? GL L G '
1 I
1 1 I t
I
1 ? 1 1 ? r
li
1 } 1 t I

1 ?
1 l
1
1 1 \
1 1
1 1
/ I
1
1 1:
1 1
1 1
t 1
t 1
1 I
1 Ii r
1 I

1 11
1 I
1 1
1 Ili
1 I'I
1 I''
1 ? 1
1
1 '?I

1
1 i'I
?I
1 t
1 I
I I,

I '
1 I
1
1
I I,
1

O
O
ti
N
O fi
M ?
O
O
N
0
O
`D V N O m ?o It
(71 Oll C, C, OC oc 00
V V V V V V
(Iaaj) uO!Inna1_7
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
O '^
O N
O

O

? O
7 U
? 0.
O
7
O ?
? U.

Q

C a ? y ?

? v ? O
b

a a"
o ,o ? c

a
Gsa
W
00 11C
(1j) UOIIUAaig POWnssd
O o0
O
O ?
7
V ?
O ?
7 Cn
E
rj f0
O w
fi
" h
r
G ?
I

O
O p

rr
V/
M
O
O

o x

?
O
O

N
O
r U

N U

O ?-
U

o I

? I
I
N 00
O O

-- N
V 1?
O ?D
O O

Q
N
O
O
O
00

0
0
00
0
0
0
N
Q O
O >"
4
O
O
y ? O
00
Q N rl
cQ. ?o
bA a" v C
ICI •O ?1
F?
a
w
w
V1
O
7 y
_O
O ?
?Q
O
? tl
ti
U
O
7 V)
M N
O ?
O ?
O O
y M
(/j o
0
N
O Y
W
O N
O
co
O ?
}
tl
N 00
O O
O -- N
O 7 [?
N o
O o

O
O
O
O
O
00

00 rq
cc ooo ooo ooc
(1j) UoijUnajg patunssd

rA
W
^N
a
?o

N M U) c0
m O
Q O O O O
1 1 0 °\ ° o o c
T ! T Oo?MMO
N
O T
.?4 G
°o u N cz p b o o
o Y

O
O
I O

O
C
O
? G M: p

a a C

m m ?

N V

n
0 -

o
•'" G cn

Q °
K
d1 El In i
V
10 co
U Cn ? ¢ y
"d
a
r
co
a
i

N
N
o

0 0

O 0 0

0 (O 0

V 0 o

N O
?mIn?cocCr-
M V1 ?G OC :J,.
Q Q Q Q Q Q
(an! ;e!nwno ) ue41 e au! j %
c
00
U
00
M
ti
C)
LO
It
M
M
C'')
aO
M
V
-
N
CO
O
so

? Y
cn Q z o U) Of Q>w-j0 UOm -i w e
CC) f-

C
O
N
N
N N lO
N
t- w < CO CO MN m "'
"t
O N W O 00
0 N O
CO
O
E ,
' , .- , N, CO 0 N
i ch N

10
O 0
Lq r M CO

M
N V CO
? i

CO 0
CD
?

"Zr
(D 04
O

N
N O N N
N
V
c
°
N
A
- N ch O
N
ql
O
O
N N
L
V
N>,
CO N co
( O
C E E O N m cu

LL J

- E

Y
C
co C (0 U C_ C .6 .O (U m U U E E E E N i0
Lo N -5 U
> Il LL N N U O U O
N U) U) J J U) w O> N
O > m

>

> >
J O

z
1
N M (0
m O O O O
1jTQ
1 ? 1 I
c
0
7
a
y M O
B a a°
N V N
m L
U_
r
m
CL
,T Ifl °I?I?I01 Ir-- I°I.0 I--t 1.0 INIlzl- I-
0 0 °
CT O
M ?O
U
CL
O of C. U U U U M U
't7
O cd > .fl b O in.
OU U cd O
0
0
0
N y 3
(n ¢ U
.b y
0 0 ?
0
0
d
d
E
0
O
N
d
U
r
m
a
_ 'T °° ° v
? o
N_
O ?
0 0 ? v? O v? ? (n
O 00 ol
O
c
cn Q z o U)II cD0? Q>wJ(n IIv0CO JIImJOW

C Lr)
LC)
N L
O O N
r- 00 M M??
(O
O O
O N 00 ,
rn N 00
N N CN
O p 0
(M (O N
N V L , , N ,
O
Lr)
N ? ? O .
C14 N !? Cri ? (O N ltd
(n CO N 't CD 00 O (O N of
(p
N
O M It
N (O aO LO (O _ N
N M V O

>1 N
(D U)

L
a) 7 M N N
CD cn

i2 `
0 m O 7 O O

O

O
J
Z
7
O
LL
c -0
O U LL
Z
N 0 0 0 U M w p> m
6
_ LL

> U m LL LL

> U V N N U) U) J J
N
(n (n
o
> > > J

co co Lo
O
L }
O
(1) O
7 D
o
N N
0-0
Z 5
0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
O 00 (O V N
(OAlleinwno) ue({1 jaui.1 %
N M u) (O
m O O O O O
Q
c
0
7
N Y d
N
00_?
N V M
0. X
r
10
a
o ° ° 0 0
M N . O
N
CL
c
'
O d cc _0
c 'O d U
O O.

0
0
0
0
0
O O
d "t ? p
d O i
o Q 0
N N «Y y, F:
N ? ? a N
v 'ti ?
r
?a
a i
O
O
0 0 0 0 0 o O
O O o O o 0
O aD (D V N
(ani;elnwno) ueyl jeui j
II.
Icl?
,)II-INI?III?I?I?I?I?ICOIMI00INININ
Z M V) CT M
N 00 N Vl
N
N
,--? m v In m rn
cn Q z 0 U) OW<> W -iw UOm J m-1pof C
m
N N V N (h V Cho M N 02 N M? O N 00
i i M i (O i i i i i i i i O
? N? N V Lo CO CV N LO V O 00 O (O N N't N
N ^
O N Md O0)N 00 N NO
N N O ?
C E N _C E E a? a? E J Y
N 7 to - N N- U
LL O LL p N O i O O cc c0 ? c0 cC ,? O
u m o U Z ii ii m a?i o o U U co u J J N> C
> ?Um> ??UV?y ??m
N co
Q 2 2 2
ii f
C
0
3
a
? Y d
N /0
G a
N V ?
CL X
U
t
t0
a
0 0 0
0C M oc °
N
C4
p F"' cd A O O > -C V O m O.
O cd 'O O R. 'O .
0
0
0
O
O C x

m .? o

o ? Q o
N N C] , 3
cn J

U

R
a
0
0
0
0
O
°°I(0ICO INI,T INI'D 10, I,-) Ir- 10, I- ICI- I - I-
cV o0 Q? .-^? p O
O
N
C/]
0 0 0 Q Q Q
0
c
(n <z 0 (nil oa?<>wJcn 110 OmJJIM JOof
_ 00
N U') O M O O N pp O CO N N N "T
D CN ?? N N CEO m N m LO O O
i i i h Ch i i I
LO C? LO V N N N Lf) N- U') O N M (D N a00 LO CND N N
C7 N 0) C? N M O
CY.
N N N i
_ E N C_ E E N N (B cc -- N O- J
LL C N= U) O LL O N .7 2 i e O O C4 (6 O (6 f0 ? 27
21, (1) 2 2 C) (n (n J J (n (n
N O Q
> > > J
c o
E?
C o
O
E LO
(3)
C
N L
N O
E '0
O a)
O U
O ?
? O
0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
O co O V N
(anileinwno) ueyl jaui j %
LO O
O O
c
0
.3
.L Y
N ?
o a '-
N U Q
IL N
N `
d x
U
l6
a
0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
O N co V N
(8ni;ejnwn3) ueyl iaui:j %
'I °I°I'D I,T I'm I,*- IMI.,t INININ
o a o
M N ?n
N ? N
O
O [? ? b ? N ? `.-. G N cC
> -. •o o d w
ro O i
0
O
O
O
O
o r It 0
d ? ° o
C
C
CD 0
N N c? ?
d V1 ? ?. N

IL
17
N
O O O O 't

N
N
?
O
?
o ?O ?n O v? ? ?n
O m W) IC 00 C?
Q Q
Q Q Q Q
CO a z 0 cnll CDwa>w -i cn IIUOm JIImJOIx
Un LCD v co
04 N
N LL N? ti 00 O N O co V Nc?2 N Co O N
v N N N N c) (D N LO 'q 00 O O N NT
V N ?t ? C O N Cl) I?t CO 00 LO (D N N
?- N M O
N 0) 0) C
a) 2 a)
N C
E N CO C_ E E N N co CO - _- J
LL N? L O LL N N .? 2 L` O O CO C6 C>7 O CD CO ,= Z
J Z u_ a°) O V u_ u_ N 0 0 0 U U
N U N C) L) ?Z (n(nJJ wU) O>
> > > a)
o
J
N
N
O
U
LO 0 0
} r
I 1
c
0
7
a
? Y d
N l7
o a
N 0 m
a` N
X
U
R
a
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
O N c0 V N
(ani;eInwno) ueyl jaui:j %
'o C7,
O O
O
> b O O. 'b 'v
U 0 ° o
:r U 3
0
0
° I
0
0
r ` O ? M M
d ?

N N c00 ' G
?
4
,

U J
? I
m
CL
? O ?.,O .? `p N CY 00
? O
E
O
N_
O
O
O r v C x
?IMI?I?I?I?INIMI?IMI?I°I`?I?IMI?IMI?I III I?
In Q z 0 Al 0w<>w-i cn pUOco JJIM -1 oQ?

N
CO U') Ln
N N O
N
f? w m O (fl M L!? T
N r O
? 7 O CO
O 00 LO
m N 00
N N IT "Zi-
CO N O
M N
M N
3
O
04 LO Lq
N ,
N Lo
N T a0 O O N
N N
A C
O
V N
O M CO N M V CO 0, N 00 N CMO
NO
Cn
C V
N

c

U)
C_ E a) co

E E N O M M
O O
L

- N N
L

-- E -'

U
r
Cn
(n
O

U LL N ` O
?_ mU O O
3 L
LL
?-0-0coioUU f6 CO cm
EEL -
co M M?
EEv0 O
-a t
U
+. ; ? U
L, ; LL LL U V fn (n J (n (n > m O
N
>
O
> >
J 0
z
Appendix C
Current Conditions Plan View
Price Park 47 KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 291 2008 - MY06- Final
SNOISIA38 ?7
'
J13ltla
609LZ VN H1 SZ+OL NOIIWIS 0100+00 NOI1d1S
>
`V
jU,
)tuc7WFLjt;
llia? ? ? lo9v
avo8 SM sxao3 x1slo9e 90AW - 66Z a09vm 103robd d33 F z
Z 0
W
. k
N3
`dNIIOHVO HiHON 'kMoo aao=nino rc _
r
p
_ >
L S1SI1N310S • S83NNVld • S833NIJ 0 w 0 Z
? 30 S31VIOGSSY
ON T rr??``== >133?10 N3d3S2JOH Ol in o W z g
o
I ?.J n WE MVd 3011:ld a
Z
gw
zom
g0Zw
0 J Z
L-J LL O O Z U m O
W
L 0: LLWO F~
moan w9
Fn K
OZ
mw gp
2 w 0 w
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2
N
W
° Y
O z z Z¢ z
0 = z
° o co 0m 0 0
W w z¢ W F
N O o ?i U U
cn ?gW
W w O 0 a 0
U)OWXoaa
0
0
w
J
O Q
Y V
V1
V_
CL
o
O
0

w W J W
N p 0¢>

z W
J
0 p LL
OO 0 m? x 0 of
~
O
d' W J 0 F y
U
C7 j w w
~? w
O U ° J
° U¢
w
7 0
a0ZZit aa mw UHu3gof
(
J Z Z OJ (n >> 0 Z X Z H
i0 W
m»z¢mM Mm t
Ud'
Z
0
Y
Zp 0
W Z

in
z
H O mO
H Q
m p
w w m°

ui U5
a 9
° Z
2 > O
w Z 0
m CO 2 in M a
i
W
3
W
N

r•••••••••••••••?•••••••••••••••••••••••••••