20041622 Ver 1_Complete File_20041005

dAAN2s?
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
J12@08V@J
OCT 0 5 2004
DENR
WETLANDS -WATER QUALITY
AND STORMyy4TER BRWH
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 30, 2004
Mr. Steve Lund - NCDOT Projects 1
US Army Corp of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006
SUBJECT: Pipe replacement on SR 1626 (Wes Cook Rd), Cleveland County
Dear Mr. Lund:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace a cross pipe, washed-
out by floodwaters during a storm event on 9/9/04, on SR 1626 (Wes Cook Rd) in Cleveland County.
NCDOT proposes to replace the existing pipe 36 foot a 30" CMP with a 40-foot x 42" CMP with inlet
concrete headwall and 5 feet of associated riprap for outlet structure protection. The scope of the work
will permanently impact an additional 9 linear feet of jurisdictional waters associated with an unnamed
tributary to Little Knob Creek. The Division of Water Quality classifies Little Knob Creek as Class C
Waters. This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for this project and is recommending a finding
of "no effect" for T &E species and historical structures. The proposed project is not located within any
designated critical resources waters or NC-designated waters or wetlands. The replacement pipe will be
installed on a 2.2% slope, based upon thalweg elevation measurements, and set 8.5 inches below
streambed elevation to allow for aquatic passage.
The scope of work will also include the use of temporary cofferdams and bypass piping for stream
management during the aforementioned pipe replacement. Upon project completion, the areas temporarily
impacted will be restored to pre-project conditions. Enclosed is the required pre-construction notification
for NWP 3 and NWP 33. Also enclosed are photographs of the existing pipe, location maps, and sketches
of the planned activities.
SR 1626
Page 2
September 30, 2004
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank you for
your time and consideration to this matter.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY: I?2A;14, ,4,1-' `-
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: Mr. John Hennessy, 401/Transportation Permitting Unit (Courtesy Copy)
Mrs. Poly Lespinasse, DWQ Mooresville Regional Office (Courtesy Copy)
Mr. Ron Linville, Wildlife Resources Commission (Courtesy Copy)
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002 041622 USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If am particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "NIA".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW# 3. NW# 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder. N Department of Transportation

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby. North Carolina 28151

Telephone Number: 704480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby, North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon@a dot state nc.us
Page I of 8
M. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and MRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Pipe replacement and tempgLa_U impacts/stream management SR 1626 .
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): DF111.202315
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PK: NA
4. Location
County: Cleveland Nearest Town: Casar
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take Hwy 10 north from Casar.
Turn night onto SR 1626 replacement pipe 100 feet past first bridge crossing
W
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/L.ong): 35'31'09'N/081'34'29"
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 0.2 acres (NCDOT right of wavy.
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed Tributary to Little Knob
Creek (Little Knob Creek is Class C Waters from source to Cleveland Co. SR 1634).
8. River Basin: Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application:Existing Conditions -pi e} a on paved secondga road. General
Land Use- Agricultural` residential and wooded areas
Page 2 of 8
10, Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: N D T
proposes to replace the existing Ripe 36-foot x 30" CMP with a 40-foot x 42" CMP with
inlet concrete headwall and 5 feet of associated riprap for outlet structure protection There
will be ten feet of temporary impacts from temporary cofferdams and bypass piping, for
stream management during pipe installation A trackhoe will be used for excavation and
riprap installation.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace
cross pipe damaged by floodwaters during a storm event on 919104.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None Anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent impacts from minimal
increase in pipe length and associated riprap for structure stabilization Temporary impacts
associated with temporary cofferdams and bypass piping related to the pipe replacement
Page 3 of 8
I Ind; Admilly list wetland imnacts below: NO WETLAND RAPACTS
Wetland Impact --
Site Number
indicate on ma ---- ---- ------
Type of impact* - Area of -
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Fooodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized
clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both
stricture and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service
Center at 1-800-358-9616, or online at htti)://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver
pond, Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
3 Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Length of Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate on Impact* (linear feet) Before Impact (please specify)
map)
1 Increase in 4 feet Unnamed Tributary to 2 feet Perennial
pipe length Little Knob Creek
Riprap on 5 feet @ pipe
"
1 bank for outlet
structure
1 Temporary 10 feet "
Cofferdams
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and
associated rip-rap, dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before
and after, and net losstgain), stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation,
ditching/stiaightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the
original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the
nearest downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616,
or online at www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g.,
www.topozone.com, www.mayguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Permanent Impacts = 9
feet, Temporary impacts = 10 feet
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and anv other water of the U. S.) below: 0
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name Waterbody
)
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

Page 4 of 8
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation,
dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation: NO POND IMPACTS
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The installation of inlet headwall minimizes increase in pipe length and still allows for
construction of adequate road shoulder. The minimal amount of riipran necessaa for structure
stabilization at the outlet will be used. The minimum area necessary will be disturbed for the
tt porary cofferdams and bypass pumping, used during stream management
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
Page 5 of 8
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
A vegetated buffer will be established on the upstream side of the replacement pipe by
seeding and matting
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o enr state.nc.us/mn/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 6 of 8
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
*
Zone Impact
(square feet
Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or. 0260.
NA
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
No additional impervious surface is proposed.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 7 of 8
NA
X1H. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

_l- p
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
l
8. 10 SOIL MAPPING LEGEND OF, APPROVED AND PROVISIONAL MAP UNITS
CLEVELAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA .
(MAP UNITS LISTED ALPHABETICALLY BY NAME)
September, 1999
Field Old Corr.
Symbol -Symbols Status Mao Unit Name Notes
36B (30B,570,506B, A Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes 1,32,34,41
33B,236B,34B)
36C (36D,30C,57C, A Appling sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes 21,33,35,
57D, 34(:, 236C) 51,52
70B (70) A Buncombe loamy sand, 1 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 9,36,72
3182 (25B,25C3,31B, A Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 12,30,36,
2582,19B,23B, 38,62,70,71
31C,32B2,23B2
93B,50B,50C,90B)
38 A Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 31,36
4A (4) A Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded 10,36,53
90D A Cliffield-Pigeonroost complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very stony 40
90E A Cliffield-Pigeonroost complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, very stony 40
90F A Cliffield-Rock outcrop complex, 50 to 95 percent slopes 40
250B (250,544B,544) A Dogue sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, rarely flooded 61,79,83
250C)
95D A Evard-Cowee complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, stony 6,17,47,73
95E (92C,92D) A Evard-Cowee complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes, stony 6,17,48,74,
80,81,82
95F A Evard-Cowee complex, 50 to 85 percent slopes, rocky 6, 47,75
380 (39D,318E,37E, A Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, rocky 40,43,58
30D)
38E A Grover gravelly sandy loam, 30 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 54,76
59B (80A,80) A Helena-Worsham complex, 1 to 6 percent slopes 16,36
38B (39B) A Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 40
38C (39C,318C,318D) A Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony 40
138C (138B) A Hulett-Saw complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky 47,52,55
2388 A Hulett-Urban land complex, 2 to B percent slopes 40
3782 (37B,318B,3882) A Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 25,36
3702 (37D,37D2) A Madison gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 25,52
137B2 (19882, 1978) A Madison-Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, stony, eroded 40
137C2 (19802, 197C, A Madison-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stony, eroded 40
17C)
17B A Madison-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 52
49E (48F) A Montonia very channery silt loam, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 1,2,37
32C2 (32D,25C2,19D, A Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,13,39,63,66
324D3,23C2,
19D,236D,237C,
23D,23D2,22C,
93C,28C3)
32D2 (36E,324E,32E, A Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 24,52,56,64
344E, 93D, 35D)
9882 (97B,35B) A Paco let-Bethlehem complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,42 '.
98C2 (26C2, 244D, 280, A Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,16,42,65
27C,35C,324D,97C)
Soil Mapping Legend (Cont'd.)

Field Old Corr.
Symbol Svmbols Status Map Unit Name Notes
98D2 (26D2,244E,28E) A Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, eroded 36
97D (27D) A Pacolet-Bethlehem complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony 8,15,36
7B A Paco let-Bethlehem-Urban land complex, 2 to B percent slopes 1
7C A Paco let-Bet hlehem-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 52
68B2 (66B) A Pacolet-Saw complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,67
68C2 A Pacolet-Jaw complex, B to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1
69D A Pacolet-Saw complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, stony 36
3C A Facolet-Urban land complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 52
Ft (QU) A Fits, quarries 1
66E (324F,32F) A Rion-Ashlar complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, rocky 24,57,77
60E (30E,60F) A Rion-Cliffside complex, 25 to 60 percent slopes, very stony 19,44,
49,52
69C (606) A Saw-Wake complex, 4 to 15, percent slopes, very rocky 1,5,59
68D A Saw-Wake complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, very rocky 1,5,59
46B (4682) A Tatum-Montonia complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,2,37
46C (46C2,40C) A Tatum-Montonia complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1,2,37
43D (48E,46E,249, A Tatum-Montonia complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes 1,2,37
40D)
1A (1,2A) A Toccoa sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, ocr-ationally flooded 50, 68,84
Ud (Uo,UdB,UdC, A Udorthents, loamy 1,4,60
UUC)
Ur A Urban land 1
43B (232B,430) A Uwharrie silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,3,37
4382 A Uwharrie silty clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded 1,3,37
43C (46D,232D,48D, A Uwharrie-Tatum complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1,3,37
diA)
4302 A Uwharrie-Tatum complex, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 1,3,37
6B (6C) A Uwharrie-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes 1,3,37
BA (86,8) A Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded 78
of Agriculture T
iservation Service - N - 1 2000
g with Approximate Scale
)eriment Station
USDA . MRCS • Fort Worth. Texas
Soil Survey Field Sheet
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Advance Copy - Subject To Change
Survey has not been compiled nor correlated.
Names may be changed and areas may be combined .
,y 1673
r
r5.q
t
a
G
/ 1513
N - - _a yYA7G71 ? - -

tSn
I

fens
i
S
1
o 1821
SR 1626, Wes Cook Rd. Cleveland County
Map 1 of 6
1 .

,,
;
a /* •
..1

,? • ( )I* .0

?
•arJ • ? t ?? •

1344 X

'
. ..
;ma y ` 5 •
`+ ,
•
A
•

.. •/?j {Jt •
5 01
`lr C J', C
Location of Pipe
01 ` • '; ; '. y ?. Replacement
• r rl
7 rr"ll'JII - '? Q , 11r'
g - u • 0 %:
-
fr
•
1 ,i
1
%?
• ? ,

`
/% 11 • •

?s? 11 !h r ?'•:y

i

Name: CASAR Location: 035° 31'10.41" N 061° 34'14.6T W
Date: 92712004 Caption: SR 1628, Wes Cook Rd. Cleveland Co. Pipe Replacement.
Scale: 1 Inch equals 1333 feet
CopyrW (G) IN$, Mapleoh, ha.
i I
??I1. ?. Vr .wry. r. vr?rw r...n SUBJECT 5 /,5? -'A' / U• PROJECT
-ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS!
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
tALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27611 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO_
I
,
i
,
- IV
1? I
...' 1
t ! i? I t i
COUNTY
OF Z

I
I
. ? J
• I
I i 1
N r •a
i
i'
I I
i i
I :
1 ;
?{ L
I i 1 I
i _
I
: I
i
: I
._ : .. I
00 7
I
-rA
I
:
+--4- J-}
j ?.
- -=
74-1-4
so-of
:;TATS.- OF NORTH CAROLINA SUBJECT SQ 111ZL GOO PROJECT
,APARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVI S 7N OF HIGHWAYS ---r COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY A/SG DATE 1`11,41 STATION
P. O. BOX 28201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27511 CHECKED BY DATE STIR NO SHEET- OF-2-

Poe-

?,?V?•C.\ i/ X/s'1/^I. ??q CIL(.?// ?/'-?i??• N •?,?10 M ?_-. _
6 too-

1
I,
I

1

+ ?r?1? 10 I
1

IEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VVVJ?v/' '
?[D u° /- a
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS are ?L COUNTY
HIGHWAY BUILDING PREPARED BY DATE STATION
P. O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27511 CHECKED BY DATE STR NO SHEET_ OF-
SO-01
1 i a I
?I
i
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 12 County: Cleveland Project ID:
River Basin: Broad Bridge No: Pipe Replacement
i
Route: SR 1626. Wes Cook Road Stream:
Water Quality Criteri
a:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r W
WSI r p
WS II1III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W.S. Critical Area F P
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation- Yes No
Arterial Urban r
Arterial Rural r F?
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? r r
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT '
Protection of Surface Waters"
Practices for the
land Co.