660035_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200921

Facility Number p -
kMlvision of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
`I z 5 - w
of Visit: Coro ' nee Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
in for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
19 -2/ ` 'aArrival
Time:
Departure Time: QI� County: Region:
Farm Name:
F 0 Q At
9 d
Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: 100 131- dd
Certified Operator: trA t /�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
F der to Finish
el
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Pullets
Other
Ls
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made:'
b. Did the discharge reach waters ofthe State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c What is the estimated v I th t h d t f th S II 1)
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes No [:]NA [_]NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
o ume a reac a wa ers o e Late (ga ons).
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ YesVNE�]NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 51122020 Continued

Facili Number: - p Date of Inspection: 'x(
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
'o . ❑ NA
[] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[:]Yes
VNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):� �I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
, o ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
[]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
eat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
Na ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure;'Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
ff ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
ffNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
� ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspectij�No
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - > �j �j Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out ofcompliance with permit conditions related to sludge? Ifyes, check ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No A ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
❑ No
[DNA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
[] NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional panes as necessarv).
G e+ / t b ro-4 , &-L-5
S (11 J5 P 5 A-r✓a-1
Reviewer. Inspector Name:
p ✓cq s -�-1-3-J_a
3 - ? - �• a pr .V,A-rz y
IJ = 6 -e a
C _ Sf `7
Al . 0, 5-2
Phone: ! %4 ?I% Clue
Reviewerl Inspector Signature: 134, 5I-a-9 l04, -e—
Pag>e 3 of 3
Date: ':�- -I1- ;Ly
511212020