Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout660030_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200921s� Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency of Visit: om fiance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance �n for Visit: 7utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:' Departure Time: County: Farm Name: f' Aki 3 d Owner Email; Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Phone: Title: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: J P-1,01 e P a kek Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Vean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Z� Layer Non -Layer Non-L, Pullets Poults Design Current Discharges and Stream Impacts I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) Longitude: Region: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder 13cef Brood Cow [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 S111/2020 Conlinued F'acili Number: - 36 Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes , o ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 30 ] 11l3 a(d J3 j q6'vl 5-3 S3 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environnNo-A _notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 'A ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ZoEj A ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ YesA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload [) Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ YesPNa o NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [] Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers eather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: &k - 3o IDate of ins eetion: q -9--1 - 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and'or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE lfyes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer. -'Inspector fail to discuss reviewiinspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Review err Inspector Name: Phone: ' i f j 7q S q 2 rb Reviewer inspector Signature: _ f�le :544W � Q� Page 3 of 3 .� Date: 9 - ;' I - 1—a 511212020