WQCSD0389_Complete File - Historical_20200922

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCSD0389 Effective: 01/29/09 Expiration: Owner i Town of Rutherford College -
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Rutherford College Town USDA
County: Burke
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Kenneth B Geathers Title: Town Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/13/2018 Entry Time: 10:OOAM Exit Time: 02:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Linda S Wiggs Phone: [phone] Ext.4653
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and operation
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Performance Standards Operation&Maint Regmts
Records Monitoring&Rpting Reqmts Inspections
Pump Station Manhole Lines
(See attachment summary)
i
Page: 1

x
Permit: WOCSD0388 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
_Inspectipn_Oate_ 0 811 3/2 0 1 8 __ _Jaspwtien_Type:Collection System Ins ecp t Non Sampling. __Reason for-Visit: - Routine
Inspection Summary: ^
,I
i
1
i
I
Page: 2

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town:of Rutherford College;-
Inspection Date: 08/13/2018 Inspection Type:Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine -
Performance Standards � O(// 6`� , (�....— '7C / Iv rr„r„�/� Yes No NA NE
Is Public Education Program for grease established and documented? "'-- El El El
❑
What educational tools are used?
Is Sewer Use Ordinance/Legal Authority available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced? 'J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is Grease Trap Ordinance available? _ Kf'r c � _ �[ ('ue \N-Q'/ ('14 r)'A S ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is Septic Tank Ordinance available(as applicable,i.e.annexation) y Q/b f ❑ ❑ ❑r❑ff
List enforcement actions by permittee,if any,in the last 12 months •-()T I!i �c 4,w �N k 3v+ ,Va ttc'T-I�Y✓.r0J
Has an acceptable Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)been implemented? ��]� ❑
Does CIP address short term needs and long term k'master plank'concepts?. 1-6) 5 W Cv� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP cover three to five year period? J t {1 ,� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include Goal Statement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of project area? �. `� `' v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include description of existing facilities? (� p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include known deficiencies? Puvq" EFA—lha f"' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP include forecasted future needs? h1 TI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is CIP designated only for wastewater collection and treatment? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Approximate capital improvement budget for collection system? Q M—cy,
Total annual revenue for wastewater collection and treatment?
CIP Comments
Is system free of known points of bypass? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,describe type of bypass and location
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted at ALL pump stations? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the sign include: ly
Instructions for notification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
24-hour contact numbers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,list deficient pump stations
#Do ALL pump stations have an"auto polling"feature/SCADA? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of pump stations 9-1 .
Number of pump stations that have SCADA filAtiLdLy
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry Y ;1"6(`e- a4t V Qry�G..(y�C ph
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms j
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements
#Does the permittee have a root control program? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3
�'`;^-fr-F,�,.�.J±,�1- 3-�-�.f�a�: e,Q,z.a�r //�-r �o ,®lo p�-e;r•r.,..�('—,�,_e

i
Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date:-08/13/2018 Inspection Type:Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
#If yes,date implemented?
Describe:
Comment:
Inspections 'L II Yes No NA NE
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available? �"�(af N w✓OD ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document pump station inspections? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
'?- Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are non-SCADA/telemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document citizen complaints? `q hu a 'E- ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document inspections of high-priority lines 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has there been visual inspections of high-priority lines in last six months? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Operation&Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available? y ❑ El El El
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? M 0104-4 A aAO ❑ 1111 ElDoes the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? _ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection,maintenance,&operations logs and problem areas?
Are maintenance records for equipment available? +". -�+{w�e1�d1 0� o r El El El ElIs a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment? Q vj_ + - (� 'y❑. ❑ ❑ ❑
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment? ! �(.� .�-I .. (,_p.,�-�t.-`�y�q,it i�Lt !✓�"'�
Do pump station logs include:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal? ._ �/ El El El El--}
Inspecting and exercising all valves? C Oil.N�2�lY--ew v+""" ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
l
- Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment? // ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting alarms,telemetry and auxiliary equipment? X ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station w/o pump reliability? NO ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available? ,+ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Erb W Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency? ft ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are system cleaning records available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
`y/
Has at least 10%of system been cleaned annually? 5(J IY 8-a l$ Yoa El El El El
What areas are scheduled for cleaning in the next 12 monthso /
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? i/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the plan include: /
24-hour contact numbers �,/d � Q�' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
6F.a._ Page: 4
O

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College .r
Inspection Date: 08/13/2018 Inspection Type:Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
r 1I Response time ❑ 11 ❑ ❑
nl dnP� Equipment list and spare parts inventory ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
/ Access to cleaning equipment �/ ❑ ❑ Q ❑
Access to construction crews,contrac1t/ors,and/or engineers i El El El
Source of emergency funds / El El El M
Site sanitation and cleanup materials\,iEl El El El
Post-overflow/spill assessment% vYEl EI El M
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel? y ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Is the spare parts inventory adequate? ❑ El ❑
Comment:
Records
Vas No NA NE
50 Are adequate records of all SSOs,spills and complaints available? �/9 { ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available? yEl El El El
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows(2 or more in 12 months)at same location? k4 El 11 El E-1
If yes,is there a corrective action plan? - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a map of the system available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes El El El El4a r�n
Pipe materials P V c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Pipe location ❑ ❑
Flow directionEl El El El
Approximate pipe age l I q c) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of service taps ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump stations and capacity ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,what percent is complete?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
#Does the permittee have a copy of their permit? ��YY ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Yes No NA NE
1 S J Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are public notices and proof of publication available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
#Is an annual report being prepared in accordance with G.S.143-215.1C? �JEl 1-11-1 El
#Is permittee compliant with all compliance schedules in the permits? ✓�'}. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,which one(s)?
Comment:
2 -
Page: 5

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
InspectionDate:_OB"L1$ee(3/01b _. _.___—Inspection Type.LCollection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: - Routine
Manhole uV J F(-v`�'�7 Yes No NA NE
Is manhole accessible? El❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is manhole cover/vent above grade? �f ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions? \ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole cover present? \/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is manhole properly seated? O ' Ay�.� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is manhole in good condition? ❑ El El El
#Is invert in good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
- Is line free-Flowing and unrestricted in manhole? 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive roots? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive sand? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole's extended vent screened? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are vents free of submergence?
IVA El 11 El El
-.� Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: /
Z -
Pump Station I Yes No NA NE
Pump station type
Are pump station logs available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is it accessible in all weather conditions? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is general housekeeping acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? / !!! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are wet wells free of excessive debris?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA present? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA operational? ❑. ❑ ❑ ❑
Is simple telemetry present? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is simple telemetry operational? - - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑"'
Are audio and visual alarms present? - El El ❑ El
Are audio and visual alarms operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Pump station inspected as required? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are backflow devices in place? ,/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Clan r �hn TICS
Page: 6

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/13/2018 Inspection Type:Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Are backilow,devices operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are air relief valves in place? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are air relief valves operable? • ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is an emergency generator available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Can the emergency generator run the pumps? , / El El El
y Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator operable? I / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is fuel in tank and sufficient?
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule? l
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted? ! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it include: ` /J
Instructions for notification? \/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Emergency phone number ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 'I
Is public access limited? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is pump station free of overflow piping? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow? 1� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps?
Comment: f
2 -
r^n��,
LineslRiaht-of-WayslAeriel Lines � - Yea No NA NE
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? V ❑ ❑. ❑ ❑
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions? / ZA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage? ��� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there areas of exposed line? M ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is any exposed line constructed of ductile iron or other approved material? �I El El El El
Are water crossing and supports in good condition? �vQQ�r=IS l ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is right-of-way free of non-utility motorized traffic?f� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free of visible damage? 1{ ! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there siphons in this system? A ¢! ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,are they maintained and documented?
Comment:
1 -
Manhole 7 1 I-)
Yes No NA NE
Is manhole accessible? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is manhole cover/vent above grade? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
1- - - _--Inspection.Date:-oa/13/2018 _—Inspection-Type.:CoiiectionSystem Inspect Non Sampling Reason foLVlslt: Routine,_
Is the manhole free of visible signs of overnow? ElEl El El
I 1
Is the manhole free of sinkholes and depressions? j tV'�")(���-� `�� I' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole cover present? y1� / 1 -. „ mac ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is manhole property seated? w El El El El
#Is manhole in good condition? El El El ❑
#Is invert in good condition? Y % ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free-Flowing and unrestricted in manhole? \Iq 'q ❑ El El
Is manhole free of excessive amounts of grease?_/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole free of excessive roots? \ El El ❑ Eli.
Is manhole free of excessive sand? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is manhole's extended vent screened? ,/ /1 { ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are vents free of submergence? /V j' i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are manholes free of bypass structures or pipes? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
1
Comment:
1 yr `
Lines/Right-of-Wave/Aerie)Lines % Yes No NA NE
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
t
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there areas of exposed line? _AJ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is any exposed line constructed of ductile iron or other approved material? l� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are water crossing and supports in good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is right-of-way free of non-utility motorized traffic? V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free of visible damage? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
I
#Are there siphons in this system? /I/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes,are they maintained and documented?
Comment:
1
Pump Station l 1'L I Yes No NA NE
Pump station type
Are pump station logs available? �/ El El El El
Is it accessible in all weather conditiioons? , ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is general housekeeping acceptable? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? f ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all o erable? / El El El Elpumps P
Are wet wells free of excessive debris? L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 8

Permit: WQCSD0309 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/13/2018 Inspection Type:Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable? ❑ El ❑ ❑
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA present? ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA operational? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is simple telemetry present? El El El
Is simple telemetry operational? J 1:1 El El El
Are audio and visual alarms present? 1 ❑ ❑ Q ❑
Are audio and isua alarms operable? NCO L'1 V I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Pump station inspected as required? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are backflow devices in place? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are backflow devices operable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
1 Are air relief valves in place? \y/ _ El El ❑ El
Are air relief, opemble? / � kA*j �.-.�o(�� El 1-11-1 El
# Is an emergency generator available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Can the emergency generator run the pumps? ❑ ❑ Q ❑
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator operable? y[f..s� al r3 El El El El
#Is fuel in tank and sufficient?
J El El El El
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it include:
Instructions for notification? I ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Pump station identifier? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Emergency phone number ❑ El ❑ ❑
Is public access limited? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is pump station free of overflow piping? \/ El ❑ ❑ El
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps?/ ? j
Comment: �/ J
Page: 9

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCSD0389 Effective: 01/29/09 Expiration: Owner: Town of Rutherford College
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Rutherford College Town-USDA
County: Burke
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Jimmy O Huffman Title: Mayor Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits: 07
Inspection Date: 08/02/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda S Wiggs Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): Ext.4653
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and
operation
Facility Status: fl Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Performance Standards Operation&Maint Reqmts ■Records
■Monitoring&Rpting ■Inspections Pump Station Lines
Reqmts
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

E
Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner.Facility: Town of Rutherford College
i` --- --Inspection-Dates-0 810 2/2 013--Inspection Type: Collection-System-Inspect-Non-Sampling-- . ___._-Reason-for-Visit: Routine-_... . __._
1 Inspection Summary:
Mo
Svbr
ti 1 r
Page: 2
�� fc) . CM,�c ✓' —V'

Permit: WQCSDO389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/02/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Performance Standards Yes No NA NE
Is Public Education Program for grease established
A and documented? n n n n
What educational tools are used? b I�Y1atTA- t- 1 '�,"5
Wtur
Is Sewer Use Ordinance/Legal Authority available?/ I Cl ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance its enforced? '• n n n n
Is Grease Trap Ordinance available? U dW— C orb"-�— n n n n
f
Is Septic Tank Ordinance available(as applicable,i.e. annexation),� 1'5 n n n n
List enforcement actions by permittee, if any, in the last 12 months iv f r�
Has an acceptable Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)been implemented? n n n n
Does CIP address short term needs and long term\"master plant/concepts. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does CIP cover three to five year period? ❑ n ❑ ❑
Does CIP include Goal Statement? - n n n n
Does CIP include description of project area? n n n n
Does CIP include description of existing facilities? ❑ ❑ n n
Does CIP include known deficiencies? ❑ n ❑ ❑
Does CIP include forecasted future needs? ❑ n ❑ ❑
Is CIP designated only for wastewater collection and t ment? ❑ n ❑ ❑
Approximate capital improvement budget for collect on system?
Total annual revenue for wastewater collection and treatment?
CIP Comments
Is system free of known points of bypass? n n n n
If no, describe type of bypass and location
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted at ALL pump stations? n n n n
#Does the sign include:
Instructions for notification? ❑ n ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier? n n n n
24-hour contact numbers ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no, list deficient pump stations
Page: 3

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
1 -- —inspection Date- 08/02/2013--Inspection Type-Collection-System-Inspect Non Sampling-------Reason for Visit:Routine —
#Do ALL pump stations have an"auto polling"feature/SCADA? ❑ ❑ n ❑
Number of pump stations
Number of pump stations that have SCADA ` (J
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms 1.d
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements
#Does the permittee have a root control program? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#If yes,date implemented?
Describe:
Comment:
i
Inspections Yes No NA NE
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document pump station inspections? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week? n n n n
Are non-SCADA/telemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day? l ❑ n n n
' Are records available that document citizen complaints? GcT�'-t"'�`—�C�J n n n n
_I #Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system? n ❑ ❑ n
I #Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year? ALA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document inspections of high-priority lines? l/ n n In n
.Has there been visual inspections of high-priority lines in last six months? ❑ ❑ n ❑
Comment:
Operation &Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available?� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? 9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? n n n ❑
i
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance, &operations logs and problem areas? }'
I
Are maintenance records for equipment available? ,.,,,/ ^ C: _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment? r✓� n n n n
C.v
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment?
Page: 4
_l

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/02/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Do pump station logs include:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting and exercising all valves? Y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipm� ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Inspecting alarms,telemetry and auxiliary equipment?`J ❑ ❑ n ❑
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station w/o/pump reliability? /V n n n n
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available? Yj"rw /rwiu' In In ❑ ❑
Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency? /'� �w ^ A,,-" ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are system cleaning records available? 4'/K, ' �[tF-O"�� n n ❑ n
Has at least 10%of system been cleaned annually? o/' �QyfoGl js n n n n
What areas are scheduled for cleaning in the next 12/months9 o rr'o „S / e
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? �r ���5 /"�"-�- tl ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers Y n ❑ n n
Response time ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Equipment list and spare parts inventory ❑ 0 0 ❑
Access to cleaning equipment ❑ ❑ In In
Access to construction crews,contractors,and/or engineers ❑ In In In
Source of emergency funds n In In In
Site sanitation and cleanup materials In In ❑ ❑
Post-overflow/spill assessment 0 ❑ 0 ❑
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the spare parts inventory adequate? n ❑ ❑ n
Comment:
Records Yes No NA NE
Are adequate records of all SSOs,spills and complaints available? L ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available? ❑ ❑ 0 0
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows(2 or more in 12 months)at same location? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is there a corrective action plan? 0 ❑ ❑ 0
Is a map of the system available? 0% ❑ n n n
// Page: 5

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
---- —Inspection-Date, 08/02/2013 Inspection-Type_Collection-System-Inspect-Non-Sampling— -Reason-for-visit:Routine-
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
�--^ Pipe materials
Pipe location n n n n
Flow direction S/ n in n n
Approximate pipe age n n n ❑
Number of service taps tJ "' n n n n
j Pump stations and capacity y n n n n
If no,what percent is complete?
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
#Does the permittee have a copy of their permit? 'AO'A n in ❑ ❑
Comment:
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available?/ n n In n
-- Are public notices and proof of publication available? j n n n n
#Is an annual report being prepared in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1C? n ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is permittee compliant with all compliance schedules in the permits? IVA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,which one(s)?
Comment:
#1 -
Pump Station Yes No NA NE
i
Pump station type
Are pump station logs available? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is it accessible in all weather conditions? y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is general housekeeping acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? n ❑ El
Are all pumps operable? n n n n
Are wet wells free of excessive debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6
_ I

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/02/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable? n n n n
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA present? ��.�[�r n n n n
��
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA operational? / n n n n
Is simple telemetry present? / ❑ n n n
Is simple telemetry operational? / ❑ n n n
Are audio and visual alarms present?"/ ❑ ❑ n n
Are audio and visual alarms operable? Y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Pump station inspected as required? Y n n n n
Are backflow devices in place? ❑ ❑ n ❑
Are backflow devices operable? ❑ ❑ n ❑
Are air relief valves in place? A/JI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are air relief valves operable? /V 1't Q n n n n
# Is an emergency generator available? Y go(ia "`J n In n n
i
Can the emergency generator run the pumps? n n n n
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up? "�/ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator operable? / ❑ n ❑ n
#Is fuel in tank and sufficient? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule? n n ❑ n
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted? ❑ ❑ n n
Does it include:
Instructions for notification? 1 Cl ❑ n n
Pump station identifier? / ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Emergency phone number n n ❑ ❑
Is public access limited? y ❑ n n n
Is pump station free of overflow piping? Y ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
Is the pump station free of signs of overfl9v n ❑ ❑ Cl
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps? (�
Comment: /
MAIN ST-
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerie) Lines Yes No NA NE
Page: 7

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
----- ---Inspection-Date:-08/02/2013----Inspection Type�Collection-System-Inspect-Non-Sampling---_ _.--Reason-for-Visit:—Routine—- ---
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Are there areas of exposed line? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is any exposed line constructed of ductile iron or other approved material? n ❑ In n
Are water crossing and supports in good condition? ❑ In n In
#Is right-of-way free of non-utility motorized traffic? ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
Is line free of visible damage? n In n n
#Are there siphons in this system? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, are they maintained and documented?
I
Comment:
1
I
l
I
1
i
I
I
Page: 8
1

i
1061 R F71LM
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A.Reeder John E.Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
August 13, 2013
Kenneth B. Geathers Jr., Town Manager
Town of Rutherford College
PO Box 406
Rutherford College, NC 28671
SUBJECT: Collection System Inspection
Town of Rutherford College
Tracking No: WQCSD0389
Burke County
Dear Mr. Geathers:
On August 6, 2013, 1 conducted an inspection of the Town of Rutherford College's
collection system program. You were present for part of the inspection along with John
Abernethy with West Consultants. The program was found to be in compliance with the
deemed collection system requirements. Your time during the inspection, as well as Mr.
Abernethy's efforts in this program, is appreciated.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments.
If you or your staff have any questions, please call me at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
//,r/4. I
Linda Wiggs
Environmental Senior Specialist
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosure
cc: John Abernethy(e-copy)
Central Files
Asheville Files
G:\WQ\SWP\Burke\Collection Systems\Town of Rutherford College Collection System\CEI.08-06-13.Ltr.doc
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION—ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Location:2090 U.S.Highway 70,Swannanoa, NC 28778 828 NOn�CarOliria
Phone::ww .nawat00\FAx:org 299-7043 Natur6 Iff Internet:www.ncwateraualitv.org

-I
I,
'�
�i
I

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCSD0389 Effective: 01/29/09 Expiration: Owner: Town of Rutherford College
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Rutherford College Town-USDA
County: Burke
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Kenneth B Geathers Title: Town Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 0 8/0 612 01 3 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda S Wiggs dlpv Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector( Ext.4653s): q�f.G`
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and
operation
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Miscellaneous Questions Performance Standards Operation&Maint Reqmts Records
■Monitoring&Rpting ■Inspections Pump Station Lines
Reqmts
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner•Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
r
1 Inspection Summary:
The Town of Rutherford College employs John Abernethy with West Consultant to operate their collection system. John
Abernethy is very knowledgeable and conscientious in the job performed thus far for Rutherford College in operating and
maintaining this system.
This is a deemed collection system, consisting of—19 miles of sewerlines with 2 pump stations. It is a fairly new collection
system (late 80s-early 90s). The entire system discharges to the Valdese collection system.
Pump Stations:
Carnegie St.-2 submersible 50 GPM pumps
Azalea Dr. -2 submersible 200 GPM pumps
The wet wells are pumped annually or as needed.
Two industries currently discharge to the Rutherford College collection system: Omara and BSN Jobst.
1
Page: 2

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Performance Standards Yes No NA NE
Is Public Education Program for grease established and documented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
What educational tools are used?
Bimonthly newsletter can include info.
Is Sewer Use Ordinance/Legal Authority available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced? ■ Cl ❑ ❑
Is Grease Trap Ordinance available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is Septic Tank Ordinance available(as applicable,i.e.annexation) ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
List enforcement actions by permittee, if any,in the last 12 months
Has an acceptable Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)been implemented? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP address short term needs and long term\"master plan\"concepts? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP cover three to five year period? Cl ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP include Goal Statement? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP include description of project area? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP include description of existing facilities? - ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP include known deficiencies? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Does CIP include forecasted future needs? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is CIP designated only for wastewater collection and treatment? ❑ El ■ ❑
Approximate capital improvement budget for collection system?
Total annual revenue for wastewater collection and treatment?
CIP Comments
Is system free of known points of bypass? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If no,describe type of bypass and location
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted at ALL pump stations? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the sign include:
Instructions for notification? ■ ❑ Cl ❑
Pump station identifier? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
24-hour contact numbers ■ 0130
If no, list deficient pump stations
Page: 3

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College -
I; Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
1
#Do ALL pump stations have an"auto polling"feature/SCADA? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Number of pump stations 2
Number of pump stations that have SCADA 0
Number of pump stations that have simple telemetry 2
I
Number of pump stations that have only audible and visual alarms 0
Number of pump stations that do not meet permit requirements 0
#Does the permittee have a root control program? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#If yes,date implemented?
Describe:
As needed basis. Contracted.
Comment:
Inspections Yes No NA NE
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document pump station inspections? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are non-SCADA/telemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are records available that document citizen complaints? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are records available that document inspections of high-priority lines? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
f Has there been visual inspections of high-priority lines in last six months? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Operation &Maintenance Requirements Yes No NA NE
Are all log books available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis? 01111 ❑
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance,&operations logs and problem areas?
As needed.
Are maintenance records for equipment available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment? monthly
1 Page: 4
I

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Do pump station logs include:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting and exercising all valves? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Inspecting alarms,telemetry and auxiliary equipment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station w/o pump reliability? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are system cleaning records available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has at least 10%of system been cleaned annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
What areas are scheduled for cleaning in the next 12 months?
Omara line.
College Pines line.
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Response time ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Equipment list and spare parts inventory ■ ❑ 0 ❑
Access to cleaning equipment ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Access to construction crews,contractors,and/or engineers ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Source of emergency funds ■ ❑ 0 ❑
Site sanitation and cleanup materials ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Post-overflow/spill assessment ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the spare parts inventory adequate? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: The public works infrastructure O & M is contracted out, as is spill
response.
Records Yes No NA NE
Are adequate records of all SSOs, spills and complaints available? 001111
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows(2 or more in 12 months)at same location? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

i
Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
5
Comment:
CARNEGIE ST -
Pump Station Yes No NA NE
Pump station type Duplex
Are pump station logs available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is it accessible in all weather conditions? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
#Is general housekeeping acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are wet wells free of excessive debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are upstream manholes free of excessive debris/signs of overflow? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are floats/controls for pumps/alarms operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA present? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
I
Is"auto polling"feature/SCADA operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is simple telemetry present? - ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is simple telemetry operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are audio and visual alarms operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the Pump station inspected as required? ■ Cl ❑ 0
i
Are backflow devices in place? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are backflow devices operable? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are air relief valves in place? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are air relief valves operable? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is an emergency generator available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Can the emergency generator run the pumps? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the pump station equipped for quick hook-up? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the generator operable? ■ 0 ❑ 0
#Is fuel in tank and sufficient? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Is the generator inspected according to their schedule? ■ ❑ Cl ❑
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 8
_J

Permit: WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility: Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 08/06/2013 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Does it include:
Instructions for notification?- ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump station identifier? ■ ❑ 0 ❑
Emergency phone number ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is public access limited? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is pump station free of overflow piping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the pump station free of signs of overflow ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are run times comparable for multiple pumps? yes
Comment:
OMARA-INDUSTRY -
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerie) Lines Yes No NA NE
Is right-of-way accessible for emergency? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is right-of-way free of sinkholes or depressions? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line/right-of-way free of evidence of leakage? ■ ❑ 0 ❑
#Are there areas of exposed line? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
#Is any exposed line constructed of ductile iron or other approved material? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Are water crossing and supports in good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
#Is right-of-way free of non-utility motorized traffic? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is line free of visible damage? ■ ❑ 0 0
#Are there siphons in this system? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
If yes,are they maintained and documented?
Comment: This line receives the two industrial wastewater discharges.
Page: 9

1
i
I�
-J

TOWN OF
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
NORTH CAROLINA
COMMUNICATION ASSESSMENT
And
SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE
PREPARED BY: COLLECTIONS ORC
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE, NORTH CAROLINA

PURPOSE:
This plan is to be implemented in the event of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow, (SSO)
or spill within the Collection System. The plan was developed to insure the key personnel
response to ever spill event within sixty (60) minutes of a reported event.
INITIAL RESPONSE:
Spills reported to or detected by collection system personnel require immediate
attention. The Collection System ORC or his appointed Back-up Operator will make the
preliminary assessment of the spill within 15 minutes after receiving report. That
assessment includes visiting the spill site. The ORC or Back-up will determine the
appropriate response and request assistance from key personnel as necessary. The
attached call back list will be maintained current and be ranked according to essential
response including, i.e. equipment operators. Local contractor may be employed as
deemed necessary.
Key personnel will, upon assessing the site, continue to document the event and
determine the severity, magnitude, and potential environmental impact. Ever effort
should be made to minimize the spill event consistent with the containment and source
control section of this plan. The safety of the response dent should in no way be
compromised.
Key personnel should implement recovery actions to eliminate the cause of
obstruction and/or system failure as outlined in this plan.
POST SPILL RESPONSE, (REPORTING):
After containment is achieved, the Division of Water Quality, (DWQ) must be
contacted as soon as possible but, in no case later than 24 hours after initial detection if,
1) The spill has reached surface waters, "Waters of the State"or
2) The spill exceeds one thousand gallons, (1,000 gals.)
Every small spill must be logged on site including time,date, approximate
volume, name of respondent.
Spills that are fully contained and removed quickly and are less than one thousand
gallons are not required to be reported to DWQ. However, a full spill report form will be
filled out and kept on file.

SOURCE CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT
PROCEDURE
Depending on the nature of the spill or overflow, the initial assessment should
indicate the priority of source control and/or containment.
1) When the source can be isolated through valves, plugs or other
methods, the flow should be discontinued immediately or reduced
to the least possible volume.
2) If the pumps on the location are not operating the control panel
should be checked for;
a. Power ON?
b. Check breaker.
C. Breaker closed, check thermal overloads. (External button).
d. Overload good, Check fuses, if you are trained to do so.
e. Is pump straining? (Clogged with debris?)
f. Do you smell a burnt motor?( contact vendor from list)
g. Call for Electrician. (From attached list.)
3) Containment methods will typically include;
a. Sand or dirt dikes and dams. (Small streams, creeks.)
b. Holes or pits. (To prevent run off to surface waters.)
If the spill event resulted from an area wide power outage you should contact
Power Company and identify your site as critical. You must have account number
for location.
If the problem is mechanical in nature, retrieve parts from inventory and make
repairs. Re-order parts as they are used! Call listed electrician.
If the problem results from sewer blockage call for jet rodding machine or
contractor from list.

i
KEY PERSONNEL CONTACT NUMBERS
UPDATED: 02-08-2006 BY: J.M. STOCKTON
Semi-annual Collection ORC
CONTACT/TITLE TELEPHONE
J.M. STOCKTON WORK 874-2420
COLLECTION ORC HOME 874-2420
CELL 381-4724
MATT JENSEN CELL 413-4991
BACK-UP ORC HOME 879-2984
CLERK / TOWN HALL 874-0333
BURKE COUNTY SHERIFF 438-5500

KEY CONTRACTORS AND VENDORS
WATER AND SEWER CONTRACTORS:TELEPHONE#'S
Plumbing, Trenching and Digging [phone]
F & S Contractors (Ronnie Franklin)
Sewer Pump Trucks, Septic Tank Hauler, ETC.. [phone]
Williams Septic Tank Service
Contract Jet Rodder [phone]
Roto - Rooter
Electrical Contractors [phone]
Connelly Springs Electric
Power Company [phone]
First Baptist Pump Station
141 Carnegie Street
Meter number 344315
Account number 1513158577
Azalea Drive Pump Station
171 Azalea Drive .
Meter number 219515
Account number 1111149230
Equipment Vendors [phone]
Connelly Springs Electric for Pump or panel repair.

RESPONSE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT Phone Numbers
Back Hoe F & S Contractors [phone]
Dump Truck
Water Flusher
Labor
Jet Rodder Roto-Rooter [phone]
RESPONSE SUPPLIES
SUPPLY LOCATION VENDOR PHONE #
Lime Shop Ballards Hardware [phone]
Straw Shop
Rakes Shop
Shovels Shop
Garbage Bags Shop
Warning Tape Shop
Signs Shop

SPILL OCCURRING ON:
MAJOR INTERCEPTOR RIGHT OF WAY
1. Put up warning tape "DO NOT ENTER "around
SSO site to restrict access.
2. In open areas lime, remove debris and lime site
rotor-till if needed. Re-seed and mulch with
straw.
3. In areas were there is under growth and small
trees, flush area with potable water until no
waste remains. Wait twelve to twenty four hours
then lime the area. Be certain that lime does not
flush to receiving stream.
NOTE: DO NOT LIME IF RAIN IS FORECASTED.
IN CITIZEN'S YARD
1. Till entire area if possible. Apply lime and follow
with seed and straw.
2. If waste/debris not visible apply lime and 2
inches of top soil and mix thoroughly. Apply lime
lightly, seed and mulch.
ON ASPHALT OR CONCRETE
1. Set up containment at or near the storm drainage
system. Do not let the spill enter the storm drain
system.
2. Put up Black or Red "DO NOT ENTER "tape
around the SSO area.
3. Spread lime on spillage and sand or other material
to a depth of one inch. Let this material absorb for
one hour, then sweep up. Dispose of debris
appropriately. If spill is still evident repeat
application.
4. After removing the contaminated material, wash
down area with high pressure water and bleach.
5. Pump clean up materials and wash water into
sanitary sewer.

IN A CREEK OR STREAM
1. Take conductivity readings of the creek upstream and
downstream to determine were temporary dam should be
placed.
2. The dam should be constructed near a manhole which is
accessible to the jet rodder and vacuum truck.
3. Dam should be placed below the spill as indicated by low
conductivity reading.
4. Construct a dam sized to contain the flow of water plus any
flush water added during clean up.
5. Station to pumps at clean up site, one to use one for back-
up.
6. Have a back hoe at the site for dam repairs as needed.
7. Wash down all rip rap in stream bed until no residue is
evident.
8. Put up warning tap "DANGER DO NOT ENTER".
At spill site and 400 feet down stream.
9. Pull stream samples for fecal coliform. Upstream and
Downstream.
10. Repeat sampling until normal, background counts 500
cts/100 MI.
11. If settled sludge evident sweep bottom until clean.
12. If creek or stream is recreational water notify the affected
community and local officials as soon as the problem is
discovered.

TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE WORK ORDER
DESCRIPTION:
REQUEST TAKEN BY: DATE RECEIVED:
REQUESTED BY: PHONE#:
ASSIGNED TO: DATE SCHEDULED:
DEPARTMENT:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
LOCATION:
EMPLOYEE:
DATE STARTED:
DATE COMPLETED:
TIME REQUIRED:
REQUESTER NOTIFIED? BY: DATE:
MORE ACTION REQUIRED?
CUSTOMER SIGNATURE: DATE:
COMPLETED BY: DATE:
WORK ORDER COMMENTS:

TOWN OF RUTHERFO" COLLEGE
Post Office Box 406 *g8o Malcolm Blvd.
MAYOR Rutherford College,NC 28671 TOWNMANAGER
Gary McClure Telephone: [phone] Kenneth Geathers Jr.
TOWNOP ,�
y U
2 ^
01..E
a
OHO GOB. R
W V r
January 2, 2018 No V aol
bmu e£�,- �y,Recuurces ^0I�
G. Landon Davidson, P.G. -��, 0 ob�
NCDENR- Division of Water Resources
Regional Supervisor-Asheville Regional Office JAN — 5 ',2018
2090 U.S. Hwy. 70
Swannanoa, N.C. 28778 Vvat
�, �n�tr�„r�tfons
Mr. Davidson:
I appreciate the prompt response sent from your office in regards to the Town's recent sewer spill at its
Azalea Drive Lift Station. Protecting the natural environment and local waterways from contamination is
a primary focus of this administration and beyond this isolated, incident, the Utility staff of Rutherford
College have done an admirable job. Per your request, I'm providing you with invoices for completed
infrastructure work at the Azalea Drive Lift Station and a narrative detailing the Public Works Tech plan
of action below:
- Weekly checks on both lift stations. During this time, staff checks wet wells, evaluates pump run
times, ensures that the mission control dialer is operational and test both pumps to make sure
that they are operating efficiently
- Walk and inspect the force main twice a year because of the parallel gravity line next to it. The
age of the infrastructure makes it's bi-annual assessment high priority
During the time of this SSO, Utility staff ensured that the spill was completely contained. A pump truck
kept the wet well empty and professional contractors abated all contaminated soil and covered it with
hydrated lime. Staff secured the site by installing a fence and excavated the area with grass seed and
straw. Staff also included a follow up visit from Carolina Lift Station (local contractor) to ensure that the
system is working properly. If you have any questions or concerns about the scope of this response,
please let me know
Respectfully,
,,< - G�-----
Kenneth Geathers
Town Manager
[phone] EXT. 208

Carolina Lift Stations JAN - 5 ^",18 Invoice
PO Box 746 ;g
York, SC 29745 nnnERiwv '', Date Invoice
w , - D6RESS
VISA 12/20/2017 14911
Bill To Site Name/Description
Town of Rutherford College Azalea Drive Lift Station
PO BOX 406
Rutherford College, NC 28671 Terms Net 30
Due Date 1/19/2018
Project 17751 - Pumps over pumping and high amps
Description Qty Rate Amount
Azalea Drive Lift Station
11/30/17: During Preventative Maintenance Service, discovered both pumps 2 95.00 190.00
pulling very high amps. Pulled#2 pump and inspected: OK. Tested amps
while pump was on the ground: OK. Tested breakers and contactors: OK.
Tested load and no load voltage: OK. Compared findings to previous
Preventative Maintenance Service. Pumps are over pumping. John received
call that there was a leak on the right of way around Thanksgiving. Walked
right of way and discovered leak. Confirmed that it was the force main for the
station. Customer will have force main repaired. Raised high water float to
exhibit to customer when to calla pump truck per his request. High amps are
due to over pumping. Over pumping is due to force main leak. Unable to
complete Preventative Maintenance Service due to the force main leak.
Additional Employee, discounted labor rate 2 65.00 130.00
Consumables/Environmental charge 1 10.00 10.00
Caldwell Co, NC Sales Tax 6.75% 0.00
Make checks payable to Carolina Lift Stations at the address above. A late
charge of 1.5% per month will be assessed for all past due charges. Total $330.00
Convenience fee of 2.5%will apply to any credit card payments.
Phone# E-mail Payments/Credits $0.00
803-628-0742 [e-mail] Balance Due $330.00

Pipeworks Plumbing&Drain, LLC r i
LAI
2517 Coventry Terrace Ct Jf®11�
Hudson, NC 28638
[phone]
3.--5
www.pipeworksplumbinganddrain.com
hiPF—WoPKS , R, DI?Atid
INVOICE
BILL TO INVOICE# 2978
Town of Rutherford College DATE 12/01/2017
980 Malcolm Blvd. DUE DATE 12/01/2017
Rutherford College, NC 28671 TERMS Due on receipt
us
ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
14 Plumbing 1 2,750.00 2,750.00
Excavated pressurized 6"sewer main and repaired broken
main. Cleaned up areas around main from sewage spill.
Tested main to ensure no leaks and pumping properly
Onsite 12/1, 12/2, 12/4
No charge for water tap repair.
.._..........--..... ........ _---------------------
Thanks for your business] BALANCE DUE $2,750.00
JAN - 5 2018
S
ant < nn I!t� F� 'nn•if Op iafinns -

Docusign Envelope ID:327A1 FD2-FA3D-47E1-9861-A33DC15D52D6
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES- CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT (FILE)
Violator: Town of Rutherford College
Facility Name: Rutherford College Town-USDA
Permit Number: WOCSDO389
County: Burke
Case Number: DV-2018-0008
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State,to the public health,or to private
property resulting from the violation;
All SSO's may be detrimental to the environment but may not be immediately quantified.
2)The duration and gravity of the violation; The duration and gravity to the waterbody is unknown.
However, no fish kill was reported.
3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality; All SSO's maybe detrimental to the
environment but may not be immediately quantified.
4)The cost of rectifying the damage; Invoices submitted by the Town for the repair totaled $330 and
$2,750.00.
5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance; Unknown
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; It does not appear to be either.
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which the
Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; This is the first large spill for the Town.
8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
$122.97
1/29/2018
Date G.Landon Davidson,P.G.,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ

Wiggs, Linda
From: John Abernethy <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday,July 23, 2013 7:31 AM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: inspect
Eastbound on 140.Exit 113.Turn left at light(north). Go 1.4 miles.Town hall on right. Park in back.
From: Wiggs, Linda [mailto:linda.wiggs(o)ncdenr.00v]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 9:47 AM
To: John Abernethy t
Subject: RE: inspect
Ok sounds good, but I do not know where that is, can you give me directions from Hwy 40 please?
Linda Wiggs - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept.of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality-Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, INC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Link to Division of Water Quality Home Page
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/"`w�q
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
From: John Abernethy [mailto:jabernethy(cbwest-consultants com]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 7:38 AM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: inspect
We can meet at Town Hall on Malcolm bvld.
From: Wiggs, Linda [mailto:linda.wiggs(o)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:09 PM
To: John Abernethy
Subject: RE: inspect
Ok. Let's do Tuesday August 6t" at 10:00.
Do you have a place we can meet that morning to go over paperwork? Then after lunch we can go look at some
lines/pump stations.
Linda
Linda Wiggs - [e-mail]
1

North Carolina Dept.of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality-Water Quality Section
-- 2090-U.5.70-Highway--- - -- ---------- - ----- ------------------- -
Swannanoa, NC 28778
j Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Link to Division of water Quality Home Page
http://I)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
From: John Abernethy [mailto:jabernethy0west-consultants.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:06 PM
j To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: inspect
Right now I am free all week
John
From: Wiggs, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:31 PM
To: John Abernethy
Subject: RE: inspect
HIJohn,
Let's look at the week of August 5t", what do you have available that week?
Linda
Linda Wiggs - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept.of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality-Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Link to Division of Water Quality Home Page
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/`wq
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
From: John Abernethy [mailto:iabernethy(@)west-consultants.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:27 PM
To: Wiggs, Linda
Subject: RE: inspect
2

WEST 405 South S Street
MorMorganton,, NC NC 28655
CONSULTANTSruc Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Civil Engineers & Surveyors Email: [e-mail]
Websile: wwwwost-con8ultants.com
ftx Cy ' S�) ) d �9
To: WPCSOCC (Asheville Regional Office) From: Benjamin B.Thomas. PE
Fax: [phone] Pages: 3
Phase: Data 9/7/12
Town of Rutherford College
Re: Water Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
❑ Urgent 0 For Your Use a Please Comment ❑ Please Reply
Comments:

��
ec Water Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8G.0201
PermitteeOwner/O£ficerName: Town of Rutherford College/Kenneth Geathers
Mailing Address: P -0 , Box 406; 980 Malcolm Blvd ,
City: Rutherford Coll State: NC ,Zip; 28671 _ _ Phone#:[phone]
Emailaddress: geathe V13iigmai om
,I
Signature:._- Date; 8/5/12
.................... .... ............. .,.., ........,........................./.....c.....................................................
Facility Name; Permit
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE SYSTEM: ® "-
Faciii
Biological WWTP Surface Irrigation
Physical/Cherrical Land Application- ---
Collection System
........................................................;:�: .. .. .u.k4 'C...............................nSv.kt4.n..o ,c � "l
Operator in Responsible Charge(OR JQ�eRYe� C7 2 2 -2
� � �
Print Full Name: J PH1`i S. A RP I? Ai P- J R
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: cs. Z gcj o tk y ) Work Phone#: (SA) it3 3 ^ S& (m /
Signature: X�egoo_84 _ y- Date: CI • s" I_�t-
"I certify that I an to my designation as the Operatot in Responsible Charge for the full ity,noted I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth In 15A NCAC 08G.0204 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
......................................... ......................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name: r Vk i ( �Urrrtdt
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: C-S 3 Z-5 r'5 Work Phone#; Bzes� M - 5&le
Signature: Date;—. Z qhP '
T
"1 certify that I agr to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge fbr the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the B[J ORC as sat forth in 15A NCAC 080,0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System operators Certification Commission,"
.................................................................................................................................................
Mall or fax the original to., WPCSOCC, 161s Mail Service Center, Ralelgh,NC 27699-1618 Fax:[phone]
Mail orfax a Copy to the Asheville iK Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh 0
apprapriam Ragtppgl Q/]TcV. 2090 VS Hwy 70 225 amen St 610 R Censer Ave 3800 Barrett Pr
Swannanoa 28779 Suite 714 Suite 301 Raleigh 27609
Fax:[phone] Fayetteville 28301.5043 Mooresville 28115 Fax:919.571,4718
Fax:910.486,0707 Fax:704.663,6040
Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
943 Washington Sq Mall 127 Cardinal Dr 583 Waughtown St
Washington 27999 Wilmington 28405.2845 Winston-Salem 27107
Fax:[phone] Fax:910.350,2004 Fax:336,77IA631
Revised 6-2012

j
Facility Name: Permit#:
j ....................................................................................... . .....................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type
Grade�/Number: qq,712J _ Work Phone#: 69M) 43--f—i'k
Signature; �rrag(L(�li�r� — Date:� �'/��
"I certify that t agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge fbr the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as gat forth in 15A NCAC 080.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Cettliloadoe Commission." -
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#: t
Signature: Date:
"1 certify that I egroe to my dosighation as a Back-up Operator In Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 080,0205 and tailing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
1 .................................................................................................................... ..........................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(Bi7 ORC)
Print Full Name:_ —
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#: ( 1
Signature: — __ Date:_
"1 certify that 1 agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set fbtth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and falling to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Wetcr Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
-
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
1
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#:
Signature: Date;
"I certify that I agree to my designation es a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set fbrth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do se can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
........................................... . ..... .................................................................................................................
I!
- I
Revised e40t2

�►,� IF""" L S
MEW t wd-
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality �l
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Acting Director Secretary
July 12,2013
Jimmy O.Huffman
Town of Rutherford College
PO Box 406
Rutherford College,NC 28671
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2013-DV-0153
Permit No. WQCSD0389
Town of Rutherford College
Rutherford College Collection System
Burke County
Dear Mr. Huffman:
A review has been conducted of the Rutherford College Town's self-reported Sanitary Sewer Overflows
(SSO's)5-Day Report submitted by West Consultants. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the requirements found in Collection System Permit WQCSD0389 and/or G.S. 143-
215.1 a (1). The violation that occurred is summarized below.
Area Violation Date Description Violation Type
CSO/SSO (Sewer Overflow) Sanitary Sewer Overflow Discharge
Manhole at 100 Oak St. 05/09/2013 10,000-20,000 gallons Without Valid
Permit
DWQ Incident#201301549 (South Branch)
Remedial actions should be taken to'cotrect this problem. The Division of Water Quality may pursue
enforcement action for this and any additional violations of State law.
You should address the causes of noncompliance and all actions taken to prevent the recurrence of similar
situations. If you should have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact Linda Wiggs Regional Staff
at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
Chuck Crart�o�d,Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Asheville Regional Office
Cc: DWQ ARO Files
DWQ Central Files
PERCS Unit
S:\SWP\l3urke\Collection Systems\Town of Rutherford College Collection SystemWOV-2013-DV-0153.SSO.05-08-13.doc
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION—ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Location:2090 U.S.Highway 70,Swannanoa,NC 28778 OnrthCarolina
Phone::ww .newat 00\FAX:org 299-7043 Naturally
Internet:www.ncwatercualitv.ora

Water Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A 8G.0201
Permittee Owner/Officer Name: Town of Rutherford College/Kenneth Geathers
Mailing Address: P.O . Box 406; 980 Malcolm Blvd .
City: Rutherford Coll State: NC Zip; 28671 _ Phone#: [phone]
Email address: geathe ,sk78iigmai om
Signature: �c / — Date: 8/5/12
.................... .......... ..................... ..............................................ky.NY.+ , ..zi..
Facility Name: n Perm w
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE S � ����
FacilityTyae/Grade: % SEP J '
Biological WWTP Surface Irrigation I
Physical/Chemical Land Application N i
Collection System
................................................................ T i ............
F,
Operator in Responsible Charge(ORC)
Print Full Name: .1 O HN s3• 4 8:E;Z N&T f/y J R
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: C S X / 99 O(o 4 I Work Phone#: (SAS) lt3 3 - Sw W
Signature: � L Date: cl `
"I certify that I Igree to my designation as the Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0204 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
................................................................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name: S 211 r16(VV1 i,1 fp . I k-CM&5
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: GS 3 Z.3 r'5 Work Phone#: 0926 ) '(33 S/ote
Signature: Date:
"I certify that I agr to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC asset forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
.................................................................................................................................................
Mail or fax the original to: WPCSOCC, 1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-1618 Fax:[phone]
Mail or fax a copy to the Asheville 3K Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh
appropriate Regional Office. 2090 US Hwy 70 225 Green St 610 E Center Ave 3800 Barrett Dr
Swannanoa 28778 Suite 714 Suite 301 Raleigh 27609
Fax:[phone] Fayetteville 28301.5043 Mooresville 28115 Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
943 Washington Sq Mall 127 Cardinal Dr 585 Waughtown St
Washington 27889 Wilmington 28405-2845 Winston-Salem 27107
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Revised 6-2012

Facility Name: Permit#:
................................................................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name: ayn k/s wt!: &)Ro-
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: ,2-.5 Work Phone#: (SIP) A73 S'W I
Signature: &dzu Artw Date: �!✓✓_Z2
"I certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
.................................................................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#: ( )
Signature: Date:
"I certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
...............................................................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#: ( 1
Signature: Date:
"I certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
................................................................................................................................................
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: Work Phone#:
Signature: Date:
"I certify that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
.............................................................................................................................................................I..........
Revised 6-2012

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCSD0389 Effective: Expiration: Owner: Town of Rutherford College
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Rutherford College Town-USDA
County: Burke
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Jimmy O Huffman Title: Mayor Phone:[phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): -
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 01/29/2009 Entry Time: 09:15 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Roy M Davis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): Ext.4659
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and
operation
Facility Status: ■Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■Miscellaneous Questions
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit:WQCSD0389 Owner-Facility:Town of Rutherford College
Inspection Date: 01/29/2009 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Inspection Summary:
Rutherford College is doing a good job of taking care of it's wastewater collection system.The Town has approximately 18
miles of gravity line and two pump stations. Both pump stations have telemetry and are inspected as required by
regulation.Those inspections are documented.The Town's wastewater is treated by the Town of Valdese.
The Town was incorporated in 1977 and built it's first sewers in the 1980s. Part of the Town is sewered by Burke County
and part is sewered by the Town of Valdese (Valdese Hospital).
In early winter Max Presswood mows the right-of-way. Approximately half of righr-of-way requires mowing.Any problems
observed are reported.
The Town has a good collection system map and a spill response plan. The Town has no high priority lines.The Town will
get into the Grease Control Program business probably by placing short notices regarding proper disposal of cooking
grease on the water/sewer bill.
Page: 2

C
C:�L'7 7
_ �,-�- o�j �`-o..�..�•� .s.� /�-�-�-�-� �"� 'tom-�s�-C�.� .
n2Uxzv r�
j

15A NCAC 02T.0403 PERMITTING BY REGULATION
(a)Collection systems having an actual,permitted or Division approved average daily flow less than
200,000 gallons per
day are deemed permitted pursuant to Rule.0113 of this Subchapter provided the system meets the criteria
in Rule .0113
of this Subchapter and all specific criteria required in this Rule:
(1)The sewer system is effectively maintained and operated at all times to prevent discharge to land or ✓
surface waters,and to prevent any contravention of groundwater standards or surface water standards.
(2)A map of the sewer system has been developed and is actively maintained. ✓ �,�,�t�
(3)An operation and maintenance plan including pump station inspection frequency, tentative+ `
maintenance schedule, spare parts inventory and overflow response has been deve oped and
implemented. �l �1
(4)Pump stations that are not connected to a telemetry system(i.e.,remote alarm system) are inspected by
the pemrittee or its representative every day(i.e.,365 days per year).Pump stations that are connected
to a telera*y system are inspected at least once per week.
(5)High-priority sewers are inspected by the permittee or its representative at least once every six-months
and inspections are documented. n-�
(6)A general observation by the permittee or its�eprpsentative o the ef�n ire sewer system is conducted at
least once per year. � T:fA + -F�0..(/vf( o� ' �^ tie e.�ac(
(7)Overflows and bypasses are reported to the appropriate Division regional office in accordance wit
15A NCAC 0213 .0506(a), and public notice is provided as required by G.S. 143-215.IC.
(8)A Grease Control Program is in place as follows:
(A)For publicly owned collection systems,the Grease Control Program shall include at least biannual
distribution of educational materials for both commercial and residential users and the
legal means to require grease interceptors for new construction and retrofit,if necessary, of
grease interceptors at existing establishments.The plan shall also include legal means for
inspections of the grease interceptors,enforcement for violators and the legal means to
control grease entering the system from other public and private satellite sewer systems.
(B)For privately owned collection systems,the Grease Control Program shall include at least biannual
distribution of grease education materials to users of the collection system by the
permittee or its representative.
(C)Grease education materials shall be distributed more often than required in Parts (A)and(B)
of this Subparagraph if necessary to prevent grease-related sanitary sewer overflows.
(9)Right-of-ways and easements are maintained in the Rill easement width for personnel and equipment
accessibility.
(10)Documentation shall be kept for Subparagraphs(a)(1)through(a)(9) of this Rule for a minimum of
- three years with exception of the map,which shall be maintained for the life of the system.
(b)Private collection systems on a single property serving an industrial facility where the domestic
wastewater
contribution is less than 200,000 gallons per day shall be deemed permitted.
(c)The Director may determine that a collection system should not be deemed to be permitted in
accordance with this
Rule and Rule.0113 of this Subchapter.This determination shall be made in accordance with Rule .0113(e)
of this Subchapter.
History Note.AuthoriiyG.S. 143-215.1(a); 143-215.3(a); 143-215.9B;
Eff.September 1, 2006.

2005 DIRECTORY OF MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS 91
ROXOBEL RUTH RUTHERFORDTON -•-a.- -•- - _a ROXOBEL: 265 i RUTH: 327 i RUTHERFORDTON:4,150
(Town)Bertie j (Town)Rutherford i (Town)Rutherford
""- Inc:1911 i Inc:1893 i Inc:1841
TeL[phone],Fax:[phone] i Tel:[phone],Fax:[phone] i Tel:[phone],Fax:[phone]
Mailing Address:PO Box 37,Zip:27872-0037 i Address:108 Northview-Dorsey St,Rutherfordton i Address: 129 N Main St,Zip:28139
Street Address:204 S Main St Zip:28139 Time: 1st M 7pm
Email:[e-mail] Email:[e-mail] Office Hours:normal
- Time:9-5 TTH Time:1st M 6:30pm Services:SS-CF-PP-PR-GR-RR
,. Office Hours:9-5 W&TH 1 Office Hours:1-5 M-F Land Area(sq.mij:3.20
Services:WW-VF-GR Services:WW-ED-GS-GR-RR Mayor:Sally Lester
-. Land Area(sq.miJo 1.00 I Land Area(sq.mi.):2.00 Council:Christy Bare
Mayor:Gary T Johnson 1 Mayor:Donald Baynard I Jimmy Dancy
Commissioners:H C Boschen I Commissioners:Mike Ellenburg I Ron Giles
_., Manuel L Joyner Sr I Jim Goode I Bobby Jones
Carroll Minton I CLK:Amy Goode-Hanaway I MGR:Karen E Andrews(828)287-3591
Alton Parker I [e-mail] I [e-mail]
CLK:JoAnn S Medford I ATTY:Jervis Arledge I CLK:Holland Davis
c�* townofroxobel@ ate8l I met j PO Box 885,Rutherfordton,NC 28139-0885
9 j [e-mail]
FC:Charlie Vaughan(252)344-2471 j [phone],Fax:[phone] j DFN:Bus Scherer
ATTN M Braxton Gillam III j j [e-mail]
-` PO Box 547,Windsor,NC 27983-0547 j j DPW:Keith Ward(828)287-5961
[phone],Fax:[phone] j j [e-mail]
i RUTHERFORDCOLLEGE: j COP:Randy Greenway(828)287-5062
" [e-mail]
i 1,305 i FC:Tom Blanton(828)287-7367
RURAL HALL: 2,524 1 (Town)Burke i ED:Frank Keel(828)287-2071
- i [e-mail]
I Inc: 1977
(Town)Forsyth INSP:Don Hutchins(828)287-9508
I Tel:[phone],Fax:[phone] I
Inc:1974 ATTY;Louis Nanney Jr
I Mailing Address:PO Box 406,Zip:28671-0406 1
Telling Address:
Fax: x 549,Zip:
1 Street Address:950 Malcolm Blvd i PO Box 80Q Rutherfordton,NC 28139
Mailing Address:PO Box 549,Zip:27045-0549 [phone],Fax:[phone]
-; Street Address:423 Bethania-Rural Hall Rd I Web:www.d.rutherford-college.ncus I
Web:ruralhall.govoffice.com I Email:[e-mail] I
Email:[e-mail] I Time:1st M 7:30pm April-Oct;7pm Nov-March j
1114 Time:2nd M 7pm I Office Hours:normal I SAINT HELENA•417
Office Hours:normal j Services:VF-WW-PR-GR-SS j
4 Services:WW-SS-GR-PR-CF j Land Area(sq.miJo 5.00 I (Village)Pander
Land Area(s mi.):2.75 j Mayor:Jimmy 0 Huffman Sr i
"?� q Council:John Henryause Jr Inc. 1988
� Mayor:Larry T Williams I ry y 1 Tel:[phone]
eta Council:Herman C Denny I Richard L Icard I Address:PO Box 1508,Burgaw,Zip:28425-1508
_ Y Richard Jensen
John N MCDermon I I Time:3rd TH 7:30pm
Dewhitt C Neely i Gary B McClure I Office Hours:9-1 M
Durward A Smith Jr Thurman Reep
--s I I Services:VF-GR
_ MGR:Frank L lames Thomas A Wallrichs
I j Land Area(sq.mi.):6.00
•.r [e-mail] i ADM:Gaynell Donnelly CMC j Mayor:Robert M Barnhill
CLK:Linda Booth CMC i [e-mail] i Council:Tom Bradshaw
[e-mail] i DPU:Kathy Watson i George Brunetti
.,.d DEP CLK:Dora Moore CMC i ATTY.lames Ayers i Nancy E Jones
[e-mail] POO Drawer 9067,Morganton,NC 28680 Willie Knowles
,t DPW:Steve Wall I [phone],Fax:[phone] 1 George P S isak
[e-mail] i CLK:Mary Bakan(910)259-8826
FC:Eddie Horn(336)969-9368 ATTY.,Robert Kenan
[e-mail] [e-mail]
ATTY.,D Barrett Burge PO Box 957,Burgaw,28425-0957
2631 Reynolds Rd,Winston Salem,NC 27106-3862 i [phone],Fax:[phone]
`.� [phone],.Fax:[phone]
14
..�0
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.1._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.1._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
Key to the Services---WW:Water - --- SS:Sewer-- - ED:'Electric Distribution VF.Volunteer Fire Dept. FS:Staff Fire Dept.
line in the listings: CF:Paid&Volunteer Fire PP:Police PR:Parks&Recreation GR:Garbage RR:Municipal Recycling
Population is the July 1,2003 population in the July 1,2004 boundaries as estimated by the N.C.Office of Management and Budget. -

i
l
Y \00VTT �J�rvs�ry
(0-)
1

Rutherford College Page 1 of 1
k
q�.
The B rke County Chamber f Commerce would like to salute the had dko ng sponsors:
1�1
T
I
Rutherford College
In 1853,a small private academy known as Owl Hollow School was located In the eastern part of Burke
County.The school received funding from local resident John T.Rutherford which allowed it to expand.
Prior to the Civil War the school taught military tactics and philosophy but It was forced to close its doors Memento
when the Civil War began.It later reopened In 1871 as a four-year college.The town of Rutherford Valdese
College was founded 1871.Approximately 1,300 individuals reside in Rutherford College.
Drexel
Town of Rutherford College Glen AI In
Mayor Jimmy O.Huffman,Sr. Connelly sonnaa
950 Malcolm Blvd. Rutherford College
Rutherford College,NC 28671 Hlltlebmn
[phone] G4vemmental Aft is
Town of Rutherford College(Town Clerk) state of North Carollna Dixmv
M6.Caayneli Donnelly community Calendar
950 Malcolm Blvd.
Rutherford College,NC 28671
[phone]
[phone](fax)
Town Attorney
Mr.James Ayers
103-A White Street
Morganton,NC 28655
828-430-7725
Council meets on the first Monday of each month at 7:00 pm In the winter,and at 7:30 pm in the
summer.
IN Elrod a Friend ='printer Friendly
k 'r tih HOME I V15TDOR I RELOCATION I DIRECTORY I CDUCATTON I NEATH CARE I RESOURCES I COMMONVY I CHARADCR I MEMBERS ONLY
1)Craprioght 2006.Burke C.UMy Cb b ref Carom.,C..m.,sk.All ghUm,ui tl
5 110 Cast Fast,5beet I Meteorites,NC 186SS 1(e28,437 0211 Draft I Site Map I Dm 11.051 Ste 5W rch
http://www.burkecounty.org/communities/rutherford.asp 1/20/2009

OOE L ndpu/snrovalelsaua,oZy//:dµy ;ewalu! 8b09-9LL(6L6)xe=1 E809-EEL(6 t6)auoyd 8bLL-09
aowas jewo;sno
HN340N L494-669LZ ON'46!alELi Ja;uap ao!nias 6eW L494 µun 6uIWwiad e6iey3s!Q-u0N
14
b ! t
coo? J 19 I I -
F 1
r salepossy 18 lsaM
Sall lej4uaz)
€ lt�
uo(aaaS /gllenb jaleM 'aaL4O leuol6a'd apinaysy :ao
a ainsopu3
asno-d 'W epua1O
'Alaaaouls
'@:)gjO leuol6ab alllnaysy
Alllenb .!alert jo uolslnl0 peluoo aseald 'ja:gal slyl 6ulp!e6aa suollsanb Aue aney noA dI
'Gig s6ulmeap p.!oaaa/llwaad ha[gns.!noA ql!m uollea3ljja:) 6ulaaaul6u3
pue npal slyl daaN aseald 'uollea3!:paa apjo Ado:) a yIIM 6uole 0:)L40 1euol6aa aleudoidde ayl
of papienn.!ol aq ll!m palllwgns sluawn:)op 6ullaoddns .!aylo pue s6ulnneip pio:)aa Aue leyl alou
aseald 'OZZO' HZ 3VDN VSI pue Ilua.!ad laafgns ayl pm aauelldwoa aol paimbaa uogeayllaa0
6ulaaaul6u3 paleas pue paubs ayl panlaoaa sey llun 6ullllw.4ad a6.!eyos10-uoN s,uolsln10 ayl
uew}}nH '.4W Jea0
A4uno3 gjnq
y0sn-unnol aballo0 paojjaylnd
6StiLT00bM
uolle:)g!laa0 .!aeul6u3 :ha[q ns
TL98Z ON 'lloJ paopaggmd
9017 Xo8 Od
uew}}nH O AwwI[
a6a1100 p.!o}taylnd to unnol
£OOZ 'T .!agwa:)ad
f4pnp joILM Lo uo!s!n!p
aolow!Q •3•d'Nawp N•M ue!y 65
seomosad!em;eN pue;uawuoa!Au3 40 yuawµedeo eupmep WON '� Q
Amaaoes"ip ssou.E)we!p!M (�
I0uaan0n'A9!se3•d19eyo!W

4
uorieogiiia�
siaauloug slgi 3o aouuid000e pue idl000i so2pa1mou3loe
igaiaq RiRen�Ja7eM.3o uolslntQ agy
%OOMAllage,
yvy-
��^ e®a�sesaa0�
1 35 t
or
—Z a S eieQ
LS LG' oN uollelis[Sa-d ainieudiS
sleuaieui auc>loddns iagio pue `suo.1Eogloods pue sueld panoidde aqi `ipivad slgl
n if, luLp.uU-aoueciduioo-leiauuisgns-wy!m ipq-aq�l-pan.iasgo sum-uocianylsuoo-aqi 1>ql Bons uoilz isuoo agl;o
uoTienlasgo aqi ui posn sum 2oua5gtp put aieo onp`sallipge,Cm 3o isoq aqi of `ii'gl oieis Xgaiaq oau?uuod aqi io;
,tiuno j puv uojvoo7 aulDM Ioafo.rd
J s?ilct�� Q ?sYI aJ �71 ahJln21^ �-) -2�)Cazfd 's
`ioofoad aqi 3o uoiioniisuoo aqi (aural Iln3`Xplaa Ileo! of a niasgo of pazuoglne uaaq fulnuq `eugoauD glioN
;o a1e1S aql ul iaau�Sug leuocssa3ad paiais�Sai lnp e e '
leu�3 Ielued-
`JNI111W83d 398VHOS10-NON
Nouvolawdao s,2I3HNIgNa
f Zox o 1 d�
1
N0110 S hl Wnc) l :,lyM 000z`0£ Xuw
--- -`�i loafaid.iamaS ap!m-umoy-o2olloD �iojiagin-d3o umo,l,
694L I OOaM 'oN liuuad

• a 'dSONIO31NIHd 3d 3AN331N'090lLGNOINtldW00113011q 1tl QlOd ILZlf4IDIl00tld
-aouo le on dpaou aseeld'paaou se lou aje sainsolaue g
03NUIS Ol AdOO
p711 ;Pj-o/,-
SNHVW3H
sn 01 NVOI H31dV O3NHf113H S1NIHd :31V4/3na sail HOd
Jagl0 luawwoo pue MOIAW lod—
slued polomoo uanleH— suoponoo jol pawnlaH polsenbai sV
X
uo!lnquls!p Ao;saldoo llwgnS palou se panoaddV— asn moA lod—
!enoadde lol saldoo 1!wgnsaH pou!wgns se panwddV lenadde anoA and
X
• :Molaq palloago se 031lINSNVH-L3HV 3S3H1
�JNIllIWH3d_ 3—'SfO_NpN
i —7
ZOM 0 t HdV
n- ,11�3s All id uv
uor aOr Than s aaaurbug T
:jaglp Japjo a6uag0 aaua!;o AdoO—
sa!dweS suolleog!oadS sued— slued— sOuiMeap doLIS—
'swell 6ulM01101 agl eIA Janoo alejedas japun PaLloeuV v no),ONION36 3HV 3AA
°!
6 CAbL'COO"tSM 4ruua3 r i..
=I OC.o.Ad aaaMas eSz2aFT�� Milifilifflili
s aprbi zxMd :
R•rcPaI7i+ SLHQ
ft 1.Z9� 669LZ �ht
NDIlN31V za...u2� aarnzas Yret� LTg
6it�lg �itj8d aGznq�sz
`blalYlQ� .. ... ... ;'3NOHdRi38N{nYJ 90F:i ...• 'I''L'j2Ll� zal�M 40
t r
r
9998Z N110I N NOiNV%J0jnoS
Vd 'S I'M ,QNVi; S3'

O�WATF Michael F. Easley,Governor
�Q William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
\p. G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
1 Division of Water Quality
O -C
December 1, 2003
Town of Rutherford College
Jimmy 0 Huffman
PO Box 406
Rutherford Coll, NC 28671
Subject: Engineer Certification
WQ0017459
Rutherford College Town-USDA
Burke County
Dear Mr. Huffman
The Division's Non-Discharge Permitting Unit has received the signed and sealed Engineering
Certification required for compliance with the subject permit and 15A NCAC 2H .0220. Please
note that any record drawings and other supporting documents submitted will be forwarded to
the appropriate regional office along with a copy of the certification. Please keep this letter and
Engineering Certification with your subject permit/record drawings file.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office.
Sincerely,
4" rn. yc&,�
Glenda M. Rouse
Enclosure
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Water Quality Section _ ...
IT
Central Files
West &Associates
,
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 NCDENR MAN
Customer Service -
623-7748 Phone[phone] Fax[phone] Internet http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ndpu 1 800

Permit No. WQ0017459
Town of Rutherford College -Town-wide Sewer Project L u r
May 30,2000 Ar�r UFlUTI SC.CTIO,V
LNON-D"CHARGE
O 10 2002
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION PERMITTING
Partial Final
I, (k) -TKo%tS a a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of
North Carolina, having been authorized to obsery e trill eekly,full time) the construction of the project,
-TOO W__ W l ogc7 Set/� pp_ (2y7H�`7 1� Ce L l cserci BvIW� f�
Project Name Location and County
for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities,due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the construction such that the construction-was-observecke-be built-within substantial compliance and-intemof
this petntit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature f" Registration No. 2 r S7
Date S 0Z aat�eaceecare��
GAR0111
�.
SEAL
20757
• c*
The Division of Water Quality hereby
acknowledges receipt and acceptance of this Engineers
Certification
1
4

It t i G
t
. �^Rei
3-
xy,2 .oNt. "bPs?' "tz55's+fzkasw:'.r.`u -; .c r s t{. �r+4, �. s3
A °
i x CnO2htrU�t't�}fis.F �� Tjz$.9 �urr,is°' `} { yrr " U r�4pv
MORGANTdNi1 { A'R4L 28655 'I 4 " ♦ ♦ a },g > €� ;{2
i,� �� ��� a�A��SA;�} � #Et'.k���("h3 yi� �� �F�.(:^�"�` d(r tt S x t v4(el t`*'gs. �,Y-e{. t y,�o zs ;y'�a�41.£'�xr"�� F.� t.i'�fi""'i ' �•,�'s £'�"a'a^�°�i.L ?��v,
( ti �F t t,.f SF t Ysi �n S��„Y3 ; RI 43'44} 5..3 4 1 ,ti r, i4 KeiHA'.tvL"154� .xt'#3rZl3.trS:m
ztiit�97iK 3 4t t u ¢t;*�a r ' 4sl}� JO NU13iB �RIP On1E
t s :�, � ,��",��✓'4�z{���T
a � s�-Schaxge PexIn�fi'�InYjw�n�.„�r t z fit,a a t� , s a. ;,uuu'aY.:34inaatw'�xU
01,09��'6'�fS'fiTM>�r�r �'C' ° Sli'f�`z}T 1@ � t q� ` e~il Fit'TjCei4[Rery ~x ds. 7r3,� {si, t,, ter° h,zrS. i4s' 'S,rvt � r StT3a; 6'Tn3x , st,}S`va.3
y
3r1 § h$ s 3 RSL s sk-Fr .fxE >+Sse zP s r x a `li o a�b .t`'3"'3ary+ '.�aee '� L
L ' f ' x s e L !F r {a as � '
*z1u"t� 0t is
ra u 1'
g 0 TI
't i& ,�,$. :a u i u "i ..tom w a p, y. f • w {h r s N , r, p 'ix^6 , 1
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached —Under separate cover via the following items.
_Shop drawings Prints —Plans Specifications _Samples
Copy of letter Change order _Other:
COPIES ,, DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION
1 Engineers Certi ica ion
WATFf' C ALITY SECTIUiV�
'l
APR 10 M02
NON DISCHARGE PERMITTING
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
%For your approval Approved as submitted —Resubmit copies for approval
—For your use —Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution
X
—As requested _Returned for corrections _Return corrected prints
—For review and comment —Other
_FOR BIDS DUE/DATE: PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPYTO SIGNED
—II&A. 1-4
if enclosures are not as noted,please notify us at once. 55
F011AT�TOFITPROOOCT132T COMPANION Al W-0.VOE ENVE PE. PONTED N US.A. B • C'.'$'

State of North Caroni
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources 4
Division of Water Quality — — MOM
r �
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 20, 1999
Honorable Jimmy O. Huffman, Mayor
Town of Rutherford College
Post Office Box 406
Rutherford College, NC 28671
�n Subject: Application No. WQ0017459
6 V Additional Information Request
® USDA Rural Development
Wastewater Collection System
JNA Burke County
Dear Mayor Huffman: gECS10N
1�IA'Vayn�REG NP�OFF1
The Non-Discharge P 11 ng Unit has completed a preliminary engineering review of
the subject application. Additional information is required before we can continue our review.
Please address the following by January 20, 1999:
1) Please refer to the attached letter regarding the Asheville Regional Office's concerns
for the project.
2) Please provide a letter from the owner/authority of the W WTF specifying the
volume of flow that will be accepted. The letter should be a recent letter and should
refer to the project by the same name as that identified in the application.
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested
information. All information should be signed, sealed, and submitted in duplicate to my
attention at the address below. Please note that failure to provide this additional information on
or before the above requested date can result in your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please call me at(919) 733-5083,
extension 546. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Susan Cauley
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Asheville Regional Office,Water Quality
Permit File WQ0017459
West and Associates, P. A.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Attachment A
Procadure 9 - WQ 0017459
October 1, 1999
Town of Rutherford College - USDA Town-Wide Sewer Project
The applicant proposes a portable generator and auto dialers to serve as back-up power
for all three pump stations. Since a wide-spread power outage would likely be the
incident triggering the need for back up power, Regional Staff quesiton the Town of
Rutherford College' s ability to deploy one generator to effectively serve three pump
stations.
An ice storm would be a likely cause of a wide-spread power outage in the Rutherford
College area. Such a storm (resulting in slippery road conditions) would likely make
effective use of a portable generator nearly impossible in servicing 3 pump stations.
Providing adequate back up power in the above described scenario would be especially
difficult for a small town with limited personnel and vehicular resources.
Another concern in approving a portable generator is that two of the three pump
stations drain to WS IV & B CA waters. DWQ must receive adequate information to insure
that "sufficient numbers of standby generators and personnel for distribution" exist in.
Rutherford College, or DWQ must require that the applicant provide onsite standby power
for the pump stations.

. C . DEPARTMENT OF E/IRONMENT AND
SrAr£ y NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
�+ WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
59 WOODFIN PLACE
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
QUAM PHONE : [phone] FAX: [phone]
TO:
FAX #:
FROM:
DATE• O C�
# OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER:
MESSAGE : If questions, please call 828 251-6 08 .
a/ i'1 GLrV �/ �/1✓ �/
a,5 n/ w W, �r
U

, d .
e Pr
Comsm3€€IN RAV86 isms SEC'tKjN
TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES PLAN
DECEMBER, 1994
CHESTER Rs WEST," P.E.
WEST AND ASSOCIATES , P.A.
MORGANTON, NORTH CAROLINA
`� �.````H�GAR"'•
•''Essio'`••ti�`•
Q i
L
'''•s�f R �,a r
•'• aaN tatattt,

A. Summary, Conclusion, Recommendation
The Town of Rutherford College is currently in need of a
Town-wide sanitary sewer system. This is needed so that current
septic and drain field problems can be eliminated. These prob-
lems are a health problem to the land owner and to the community.
To proceed with a project to solve these problems is expen-
sive using current cost. It is important for the Town to pro-
ceed; however , so the future problems do not arise to further
deteriorate the area. As outlined below, the Town is located in
terrain which is not acceptable for all methods of treating and
transporting wastewater. The Town is located in Burke County in
the foothills of western North Carolina.
A total of six ( 6 ) alternatives were reviewed in the
discussion below. These included doing nothing , optimum opera-
tion of the existing system, land application, repair and/or
replacement of existing septic/drain fields , installing a septic
tank effluent pump system and a gravity sanitary sewer system.
Since the Town of Valdese Lake Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment
Facility is a regional facility and as shown in the Burke County
Complex 201 Facilities Plan, the Town of Rutherford College is to
have its wastewater treated at this regional facility, treatment
of wastewater is not the primary issue. The issue is to ade-
quately and economically transport wastewater to the regional
facility.
R
From the cost estimates and discussion, the most efficient
method is by using, a gravity sanitary sewer system with limited
pumping stations as may be required by the terrain. Therefore ,

it is concluded that the gravity method be used to transport the
wastewater to the Town of Valdese regional wastewater treatment
facility.
It is recommended that the Town of Rutherford College apply
for a grant and loans to construct the gravity sanitary sewer
alternative . The average bill is excessive using loans ; grants
will be necessary to make the average bill affordable.
B. Current Situation
Current System and Wastewater Plant Description:
The Town of Rutherford College is located in Service Area
#25 as outlined in the 201 Facilities Planning Study Burke County
Complex - July, 1974 . There is currently the Island Creek pump
station owned and operated by Burke County, a segment of force
main and gravity line to the Town of Valdese outfall . Also, the
Town of Rutherford College has a small number of collection lines
which tie into the Burke County or Town of Valdese outfalls .
The Town does not have a wastewater treatment facility. The
Town and Burke County both flow wastewater to the Lake Rhodhiss
Wastewater Treatment Facility, owned and operated by the Town of
Valdese.
Population and Demographics :
The Town of Rutherford College has a population of 1 , 126 as
per the 1990 Population data (WPCOG) . As stated earlier, the
area is located in Service Area #25 of the Burke County 201
Complex. The Population Projections from Appendix C of the 201
Plan states that the 1970 Population for the entire area was
1 , 102 ; the 1995 Population was projected to be 1 , 324 , and for

Effluent Limitations/NPDES Permit Status :
The Town of Rutherford College does not have a wastewater
treatment facility; therefore, the NPDES Permit will be through
the Town of Valdese Lake Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment Facility
located on the Catawba River. Currently, the Town of Valdese is
continuing to meet its permit limits as currently permitted.
The Town of Rutherford College and the Town of Valdese have
an existing agreement for the treatment of wastewater through
percent purchase of volume at the wastewater plant.
D. Alternatives
1 . No Action: The Town could do nothing to improve the waste-
water problems in the community. To do this would result in
there continuing to be wastewater septic system problems .
This results in ground water and surface water contamination.
Also , there is the potential for health problems resulting in
doing nothing to help solve the existing problem.
Because the Town is located in the foothills area of North
Carolina, the Town has two ( 2 ) significant problems with
septic systems . Generally, the terrain is hilly and not
conducive to septic drain field layouts . Also, the ground is
very rocky and in cases , solid rock. Even using innovative
drain field systems, the waste loading cannot be adequately
addressed.
Therefore, to take no action is to continue with the same
potential problems. This is not an acceptable alternative.
2 . Optimum Operation of Existing Facilities : This actually is
occurring in the limited facilities the Town has to date.
The sanitary sewer lines available are being used to their
optimum. Since the existing facilities are only one-tenth
( 1/10 ) of total needs , the total problem is not being
addressed. Also, since the existing facilities are gravity
sewer lines , operation is limited to the areas which can
drain into the existing lines . This is not a realistic
alternative .
3 . Land Application: The same problem which currently exists
with the current septic systems--rock and terrain--is ever
more restrictive in land application. Also , being bound by
the Town of Valdese to the west, Town of Connelly Springs- to
the east , Catawba River to the north, and Mineral Springs
Mountains to the south, firmly limits the availability of

land for use as land application even if the rock and terrain
were not existing . This is not an acceptable alternative .
Moreover, the treatment of wastewater can be adequately
addressed by the existing regional wastewater treatment
facility. Also, the wastewater would need to be pumped under
the Catawba River to available land areas . Because of the
pumping, added force main, land cost and other added costs
being compared to the treatment cost at an existing regional
wastewater treatment facility, the cost of land application
would be an added cost for the project .
4 . Existing Septic Tank/Drain Field Improvement : An alternative
would be to repair each septic tank, drain field and other
appurtenances as may be required to help alleviate existing
problems . This would include new septic tanks , repair each
drain line or extend where possible into a new drain field
area. Installing innovative drain line methods where possi-
ble and as needed. This alternative will be limited due to
terrain and rock as described above and in areas where drain
fields are not totally saturated and existing repair areas
are available .
Assuming the units can be repaired, the cost of repair and
improvement would be $3 , 525 , 000 . The cost is outlined in the
attached cost estimates .
5 . Installing Septic Tank Effluent Pumps and a Low Pressure
System: This would include installing a new septic/pump tank
at each location. Install a grinder pump with controls ,
force main to the street and the low pressure lines . This
would also include area sewer pump stations .
The total cost of this alternative is estimated to be
$3 , 304 , 800 as outlined in the attached cost estimate . This
alternative also would have a maintenance and operation cost
which would be in addition to capital cost.
6 . Installing a Gravity Sanitary Sewer Collection System: This
would include installation of gravity collection lines to
each service area with the Town . There would be requirement
for five ( 5 ) pump stations due to the terrain of the area.
The estimated cost of construction will be $3 , 105 , 600 . With
this system, operation and maintenance will have a cost which
is addressed in the present worth analysis .
a. Sludge Disposal : Using the Valdese Wastewater Treatment
Facility, sludge would continue to be handled as is currently
permitted at the plant .
b. Flow Design : The flow will not exceed that allowable for
an 8" sanitary sewer at 4 CFS .

C. Design Criteria:
300 units x 2 . 5 x 150 gpd/br x d x h
24 60
78. 1 gpd x min. x 7 . 5 of
60 sec. gal .
= 9 . 76 CFS
Say = 10 CFS Total
Total flow at entry to any single outfall = 10 CFS _ 4
= 2 . 5 CFS<4CFS . ' .OK

TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT PUMP
Material Quantity Cost
2" Force Mains 80 , 500 LF @ $6 . 00/LF $ 483 , 000 . 00
4" Force Mains 25 , 500 LF @ $12 . 00/LF 306 , 000 . 00
Pump/Tanks (Res . ) 300 @ $4 , 500 . 00/EA 1 , 350 , 000 . 00
Pump Stations (Area) 10 @ $40 , 000 . 00/EA 400 , 000 . 00
Borings 300 LF @ $60 . 00/LF 18 , 000 .00
Railroad Crossings 150 LF @ $60 . 00/LF 9 , 000 .00
Subtotal $2 , 566 , 000 . 00
Contingencies ( 10%) 256 , 600 . 00
Total Construction Cost $2 , 822 , 600 . 00
Administration 100 , 000 . 00
Engineering 292 , 200 . 00
Legal/Right-of-Way 100 , 000 . 00
Total $3 , 304 , 800 . 00

TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Material Quantity Cost
1 , 500 gal . -
2 , 000 gal . Septic
Systems* 300 EA @ $10 , 000 . 00/EA $3 , 000 , 000 . 00
Subtotal
$3 , 000 , 000 . 00
Contingencies 300 , 000 . 00
Administration 100, 000 . 00
Engineering 100 , 000 . 00
Legal 25 ,000 . 00
Total
$3 , 525 , 000 . 00
*This would include installing new tank; drain field piping ; any re-
quired special or innovative appurtenances ; removal of trees , build-
ings , or other items which are required by the Burke County Health
Department; and other items as may be required.

TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
GRAVITY SEWER
Material Quantity Cost
8" San. Sewer 82 , 000 LF @ $18 . 50/LF $1 , 517 , 000 . 00
Std. Manholes 237 @ $950 . 00/EA 225 , 150 .00
4" Force Main 6 , 000 LF @ $12 . 00/LF 72 , 000 . 00
Borings 300 LF @ $75 . 00/LF 22 , 500 . 00
Pump Stations 5 ( Lump Sum) 415 , 000 . 00
Railroad Crossings 150 LF @ $75 . 00/LF 11 , 250 . 00
Taps/Connections 300 @ $450 . 00/EA 135 , 000 . 00
Creek Crossing 240 LF @$30 . 00/LF 7 , 200 . 00
Subtotal $2 , 405 , 100 . 00
Contingencies ( 10%) 240 , 500 . 00
Total Construction Cost $2 , 645 , 600 . 00
Administration 100 , 000 . 00
Engineering 260 , 000 . 00
Legal/Right-of-Way 100 , 000 . 00
Total $3 , 105 , 600 . 00

Future Conditions
-Population Projections ( 20 years ) :
Burke County Rutherford College
1970 60, 364
1980 72 , 504 1 , 115
1990 75, 740 1 , 126
2000 78 , 708 1 , 183
2010 79 , 343 1 , 244
2020 78 , 943 1 , 307
*Town of Rutherford College did not exist as a Town.
Note : The above projection assumes the Town of Rutherford Col-
lege will continue to grow at the current rate of 5 . 1% as per the
North Carolina Department of Administration growth.
-Flow projections using the current flows , growth and industrial
reserve :
Town of Rutherford College ( 100 gpd)
Domestic Projection
Flow
Year Population Projections
1980* 1 , 115 -----
1990** 1 , 126 11 , 000 gpd
2000 1 , 183 118 , 300 gpd
2010 1 , 244 124 ,400 gpd
2020 1 , 307 130 , 700 gpd
*No sanitary sewer in Town
**Only portions of Town with sanitary sewer
Industrial Projection*
Flow
Year Number Projection
1980 0 -----
1990 2 10, 000 gpd
2000 3 20 , 000 gpd
2010 4 30 , 000 gpd
2020 5 40 , 000 gpd -,
*Based on growth from 1990 to 1995 . Growth has already exceeded
10%.

-Effluent Limitations :
Since the Town of Rutherford College does not treat wastewater
and since the Town of Valdese has not notified the Town of Ruth-
erford College of any expected effluent limitations , it is con-
cluded the effluent limitations are not applicable in this
project .
E. Present Worth Analysis
Capital Costs ( includes start-up) $2 , 645 , 600 . 00
Administrative Costs 100 , 000 . 00
Engineering ( includes O/M Manual ) 260 , 000 . 00
Legal/Land/Right-of-Way 100, 000 . 00
Operation and Maintenance
-Electrical ( $200 . 00/m x 5 P. S . x 12 ) 12 , 000 . 00
-Maintenance Equipment
-Maintenance Personnel
( 1 hr. /d x 5 P.S . x 366 @ $30 . 00/hr . ) 54 , 900 . 00
-Billing and Operation 20 , 000 . 00
Total $3 , 192 , 500 . 00
Present Worth Calculations
F = P( 1+i )u
Where : F = future single amount value
P = present single amount value
i = interest rate
u = time in years
Then: F = P( 1+i )u
F = ( $3 , 192, 500.00) ( 1+0 .08 ) 20
F = ( $3 , 192 , 500. 00 ) ( 4 . 66 )
_ $14, 880, 105

F . User Charges and Financial Capability:
Total Project Cost = $3 , 192 , 500. 00
Interest Rate = 5%
Users = 300
Term = 240 months
Payback = $21 , 069 . 09
300 Users using 5 , 000 gal . /m = 1 , 500 , 000 gal . /m
$21 , 069 . 09 + 1 , 500 , 000 gal . _ $0 . 0141/gal .
Avg . Bill = 5 , 000 gal . x $0 . 0141/gal .
• $70. 23/month
Avg. Water Bill in Town of Rutherford College
• $12 . 50/month
Avg. Cost of Treatment/O&M ( 5 , 000 @ $1 . 25/1 , 000 ) _ $6 . 25
Total Utility Bill = $88 . 98/month
(Excessive)
Note : Since there are no "current" customers on a Town wide
system, a current user rate is not applicable .

Mortgage ---- Analysis of Loan Payment
Principal = 3192500 . 00 03 : 42 : 07p
Interest Rate = 5 . 00
Regular Payment = 21069 . 09
Term in months = 240
Remaining --- Interest Paid --- -- Amount Amortized --
Paymt . Balance This time To date This time To date
Last Payment = 21067 . 82
.Total Payments ❑ 5056580 . 33
Total number of Payments = 240
Ratio of total payments to principal = 1 . 5839
Press any to continue . . . . .

TOWN OF RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
1 . Line segment ( 1 ) begins at a proposed sanitary sewer pump station
and is an 8" line . The proposed 8" sanitary sewer is 2 , 450 LF in
length and goes through forest and grass land into the existing
residential area.
2 . Line segment ( 2 ) begins at a proposed sanitary sewer pump station
which also picks up flow from line segment ( 1 ) . The gravity
sanitary sewer line into the pump station is an 8" line which
extends 3 , 200 LF through forest land into the existing residen-
tial area to be served.
3 . Line segment ( 3 ) begins at a pump station along Island Creek .
There are two outfalls entering the pump station. The outfall to
the west is an 8" line extending 2 , 400 LF to SR 1600 . This line
extends through forest and pasture land . The second outfall to
the south extends 5 , 650 LF along Island Creek and through forest
land into the existing residential area.
4 . Line segment ( 4 ) begins at the existing outfall and extends 3 , 250
LF along an existing creek and forest land to Lovelady Road.
This 8" sanitary sewer line extends into existing residential
areas .
5 . Line segment ( 5 ) begins at an existing outfall and along an
existing street 2 , 300 LF into a residential area. This line is a
8" sanitary sewer line .
6 . Line segment ( 6 ) begins at an existing outfall and along an
existing street . The 8" sanitary sewer line extends 800 LF into
an existing residential area .
7 . Line segment ( 7 ) extends 1 , 900 LF from an existing outfall
through existing residential areas . The 8" sanitary sewer line
will follow an existing draw through the existing subdivision.
8 . Line segment ( 8 ) extends 900 Lf from an existing outfall along the
rear property lines of the existing subdivision . The 8" sanitary
sewer line extends through a forest and lawn area.
9 . Line segment ( 9 ) extends from an existing outfall through an
existing residential area. The 8" sanitary sewer line extends
1 , 100 LF along rear yard areas .
10 . Line segment ( 10 ) extends 750 Lf along West Street into the
existing residential area. The 8" sanitary sewer line extends
along the right-of-way of , West Street .
11 . Line segment ( 11 ) is a proposed 8" sanitary sewer off an existing
outfall and extends 250 LF along SR 1001 in the business area.

12 . Line ( 12 ) extends 1 , 650 LF along SR 1001 into the business
area. The 8" sewer line extends from an existing outfall .
13 . Line segment ( 13 ) extends along Island Creek through forest
areas . The 8" sewer line extends 3 , 350 LF from a proposed pump
station and picks up two major residential areas . The area is
all residential in this portion of Town.
14 . Line segment ( 14 ) is an 8" line extending off an existing outfall
950 LF in the business district. The line extends into the
residential areas to the south .
15 . Line segment ( 15 ) extends 750 LF along the business district .
The 8" sewer line extends from the existing outfall into the
business area.
16 . Line segment ( 16 ) extends 650 LF from an existing outfall through
a forested area to the existing residential area. The 8" sewer
line extends along property lines .
17 . Line segment ( 17 ) extends 700 LF along Hilltop Street from the
existing outfall . The 8" sanitary sewer line extends from a
residential area into the business district .
18 . Line segment ( 18 ) extends 1 , 200 LF from the existing outfall
through the residential area. The 8" sewer line follows an
existing draw and property lines to SR 1001 .
19 . Line segment ( 19 ) extends from an existing outfall along the
right-of-way of US 70 . the 8" line extends 1 , 790 LF through
commercial areas .
20 . Line segment ( 20 ) extends from an existing outfall through for-
est , lawn, and across a small creek into the existing residential
area. The 8" sewer line extends 950 LF.
21 . Line segment ( 21 ) extends from an existing outfall along the
right-of-way of US 70 in a commercial and residential area. The
8" sewerline extends 400 LF.
22 . Line segment ( 22 ) extends from an existing outfall along a creek
which is forest-grass land; then, along existing street right-of-
way into a residential area. The 8" sewer line extends 4 , 100 LF .

W P C L G TEL : 1-70a-322=59` ( °' Dec 22 94 8 58 hJo . 001 F . 02
G. Public Participation
Town of Rutherford College
A comprehensive public hearing will be held in the Town of
Rutherford College on Monday January 23 at 7:15 pm. At this
meeting the 201 Alternatives will be discussed as Well as the
alternative selected. Also, the projected user rates will be
discussed.
The notice for the public hearing will run in the Morganton
Mews-Herald on Thursday December 22.
A copy of the facilities plan will be available for public
viewing 15 days before the scheduled public hearing.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Town of Rutherford College
Rutherford College Sewer Project
Prepared by
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
317 1st. Ave. NW
Hickory, NC 28601

ENVIRONMENTNAL ASSESSMENT
Town of Rutherford College
Rutherford College Sewer Project
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Existing Environment
2. Need
3. Alternative Analysis
4. Environmental Consequences
Proposed line and habitat
(a) Changes in lnad
(b) Wetlands and floodplains
(c) Prime or unique agricultural lands
(d) Public lands such as parks
(e) Scenic and recreational areas
(f) Areas of archeological or historical value
(g) Air quality
(h) Groundwater quality
(i) Nuisance conditions
( j) Shellfish or fish and their habitats
(k) Wildlife and their habitats
(1) Introduction of toxic substances
(m) Impacts on receiving waters
(n) Indirect impacts
5. Mitigative measures
ATTACHMENTS
MAPS

1. Existing Environment
The Town of Rutherford College is a small town which is
located in Burke County. The Town is north of Interstate 40, east
of the Town of Valdese and south of the Catawba River and Lake
Rhodhiss. U.S. Highway 70 runs through the center of town along
with the Norfolk-Southern Railroad.
The total population of the Town according to the 1990 census
is 1,126. All of the population of the town is considered rural.
The median household income is $22,700 while the median family
income is $30,769.
The project area is the entire town of Rutherford College.
This area is located in the Piedmont area of North Carolina. The
geology of the area is composed of metamorphic rocks of the inner
piedmont. The area is also part of the Milton belt which consists
of gneiss, schist, and amphibolite. The topography in the project
area and town consists of rolling terrain. The small area of the
Town north of I-40 is the highest point at 13911 . The lowest point
is north of Hwy. 70 near Lake Rhodhiss and the Catawba River where
the elevation is 11501 .
The soils in the area are in two associations. The Cecil
Association is predominent occurring in the center of town. These
soils are well drained, deep soils with firm clay subsoils on broad
ridges and fairly short sloping to moderately steep side slopes; on
uplands. The other dominant association is Pacolet-Cecil. These
soils occur along the north, west and south edges of the project
area. They are well drained, moderately deep and deep soils with
firm to friable clay to clay loam subsoils on fairly narrow ridges
and choppy sloping to steep side slopes; on uplands.
The major surface water streams in the project area are Hoyle
Creek at the western edge of the project area and Island Creek at
the eastern edge of the project area. Both of these streams form
in the Mineral Springs Mountain area south of I-40 and drain north
to Lake Rhodhiss and the Catawba River. These are small class C
streams. The entire Town drains to the Catawba River and Lake
Rhodhiss. There has not been any monitoring conducted on either
of these streams by NCDEM.
Municipal water service is available to all citizens of the
Town. This is supplied the Rutherford College Water Corporation
which purchases their water from the Town of Valdese. No
groundwater is used for municipal water supply.
Land use throughout the project area is varied. The dominant
land use is residential. Approximately 80% of the Town is zoned
residential. The largest area of residential is north of Hwy. 70.
A small portion of land north of Hwy. 70 is part of the Town of
Valdese. This satellite annexation was done to include Valdese
General Hospital in the Town of Valdese.

Most of the industrial development has occurred along I-40,
Connely Springs Road and Hwy. 70. The industrial development
consists of textile manufacturing. A very small portion of the
Town is served by sewer. This consists of the area near Valdese
General Hospital . The remainder of the Town is on septic systems.
The entire project area is included in the zoning and land
development plans of the Town of Rutherford College.
2. Need
The Town of Rutherford College has very little sewer service
in the Town. The small area that is sewered around Valdese General
Hospital does not include any of the residents in the town.
Many of the houses in the Town are 20 years or older and since all
are on septic tanks, failure is occurring. With the close
proximity to Lake Rhodhiss and the Catawba River, this could pose
a threat to the water quality by increasing fecal coliform
readings.
The Town currently has limited industrial and commercial
growth due to the lack of sewer service. To attract more industry,
the Town needs sewer service.
Since providing sewer service to the entire town will be very
expensive and with a limited number of users, the cost per user for
sewer service will be very high. Without some type of assistance
from the State or Federal government, Rutherford College will not
be able to provide sewer service to its citizens.
3. Alternative Analysis
1. No Action
The Town could do nothing to improve the wastewater problems
in the community. To do this would result in there continuing to
be wastewater septic system problems. This results in groundwater
and surface water contamination. Also, there is the potential for
health problems resulting in doing nothing to help solve the
existing problem.
Because the town is located in the foothills area of North
Carolina, the Town has two (2) significant problems with septic
systems. Generally, the terrain is hilly and not condusive to
septic drainfill layouts. Also, the ground is very rocky and in
cases solid rock. Even using innovative drainfill systems, the
waste loading cannot be adequately addressed.
Therefore, to take no action is to continue with the same
potential problems. This is not an acceptable alternative.

2. Optimum Operation of Existing Facilities
This is occurring in the limited facilities the town has to
date. The sanitary sewer lines available are being used to their
optimum. Since the existing facilities are only one-tenth of the
total needs, the total problem is not being addressed. Also, since
the existing facilities are gravity sewer lines, operation is
limited to the areas which can drain into the existing lines. This
is not a realistic alternative.
3. Land Application
The same problem that exists with the current septic systems -
rock and terrain - is even more restrictive in land application.
Also, being bound by the Town of Valdese to the west, Town of
Connelly Springs to the east, Catawba River to the north and
Mineral Springs Mountain to the south, firmly limits the
availability of land for use as land application even if the rock
and terrain were not existing. This is not an acceptable
alternative. Moreover, the treatment of wastewater can be
adequately addressed by the existing regional wastewater treatment
facility.
4. Existing Septic Tank/Drain Field Improvement
An alternative would be to repair each septic tank, drainfield
and other items as may be required to help eliminate existing
problems. This would include new septic tanks, repair each drain
line or extend where possible into a new drain field area.
Installing innovative drain line methods where possible as needed.
This alternative will be limited due to terrain and rock as
described above and in areas where drain fields are totally
saturated and existing repair areas are available. This
alternative would be $3,525,000 .
5. Installing Septic Tank Effluent Pumps and a Low Pressure
System
This would include installing a new septic pump tank at each
location. Install a grinder pump with controls, force main to the
street and low pressure lines. This would also include area sewer
pump stations. The total cost of this alternative would be
$3 , 304,800. This alternative would also have a maintenance
operation cost.
6. Installing a Gravity Sanitary Sewer Collection system
This would include installation of gravity collection lines to
each service area within the Town. There would be requirements for
five pump stations due to the terrain of the area. The estimated

cost of this alternative would be $3 ,105,600 . There will also be
a cost for operation and maintenance. This alternative is the one
that is chosen for project.
4. Environmental Consequences
Proposed line and habitat
As mentioned above in the alternative analysis, the Town has
chosen gravity sewer. There are 22 major line segments in this
project. These will in some cases feed into existing lines and in
other cases feed into proposed lines. The existing lines feed into
the Town of Valdese sewer system where it is ultimately treated at
the Valdese WWTP on Lake Rhodhiss. Each major line segment is
identified on an 8 1/2 x 11 map which can be found along with an
index at the end of this report.
1. Line segment (1) (Map #1) begins at a proposed sanitary sewer
pump station and is an 8" line. The proposed 8" sanitary sewer is
2,450 LF and goes through forest and grass land into the existing
residential area.
2. Line segment (2) (Map #2) begins at a proposed sanitary sewer
pump station which also picks up flow from line segment (1) . The
gravity sanitary sewer line into the pump station is an 8" line
which extends 3,200 LF through forest land into the existing
residential area to be served.
3 . Line segment (3) (Map #3) begins at a pump station along
Island Creek. There are two outfalls entering the pump station.
The outfall to the west is an 8" line extending 2,400 LF to SR
1600. This line extends through forest and pasture land. The
second outfall to the south extends 5,650 LF along Island Creek and
through forest land into the existing residential area.
4. Line segment (4) (Map #4) begins at the existing outfall and
extends 3 ,250 LF along an existing creek and forest land to
Lovelady Road. This 8" sanitary sewer line extends into existing
residential areas.
5. Line segment (5) (Map #5) begins at an existing outfall and
along an existing street 2, 300 LF into a residential area. This
line is an 8" sanitary sewer line.
6. Line segment (6) (Map #6) begins at an existing outfall and
along an existing street. The 8" sanitary sewer line extends 800
LF into an existing residential area.
7. Line segment (7) (Map #7) extends 1,900 LF from an existing
outfall through existing residential areas. The 8" sanitary sewer
line will follow an existing draw through the existing subdivision.
S. Line segment (8) (Map #8) extends 900 LF from an existing

outfall along the rear property lines of the existing subdivision.
The 8" sanitary sewer line extends through a forest and lawn area.
9 . Line segment (9) (Map #9) extends from an existing outfall
through an existing residential area. The 8" sanitary sewer line
extends 1,100 LF along rear yard areas.
10. Line segment (10) Map #10) extends 750 LF along West Street
into the existing residential area. The 8" sanitary sewer line
extends along the right-of-way of West Street.
11. Line segment (11) (Map #11) is a proposed 8" sanitary sewer
off an existing outfall and extends 250 LF along SR 1001 in the
business area.
12. Line segment (12) (Map #12) extends 1,650 LF along SR 1001
into the business area. The 8" sewer line extends from an existing
outfall.
13. Line segment (13) (Map #13) extends along Island Creek through
forest areas. The 8" sewer line extends 3 ,350 LF from a proposed
pump station and picks up two major residential areas. The area is
all residential in this portion of Town.
14 . Line segment (14) (Map #14) is an 8" line extending off an
existing outfall 950 LF in the business district. The line extends
into the residential areas to the south.
15. Line segment (15) (Map #15) extends 750 LF along the business
district. The 8" sewer line extends from the existing outfall into
the business area.
16 . Line segment (16) (Map #16) extends 650 LF from an existing
outfall through a forested area to the existing residential area.
The 8" sewer line extends along property lines.
17. Line segment (17) (Map #17) extends 700 LF along Hilltop
Street from the existing outfall . The 8" sanitary sewer line
extends from a residential area into the business district.
18 . Line segment (18) (Map #18) extends 1,200 LF from the existing
outfall through the residential area. The 8" sewer line follows an
existing draw and property lines to SR 1001.
19. Line segment (19) (Map #19) extends from an existing outfall
along the right-of-way of US 70. The 8" line extends 1,790 LF
through commercial areas.
20. Line segment (20) (Map #20) extends from an existing outfall
through forest, lawn, and across a small creek into the existing
residential area. The 8" sewer line extends 950 LF.
21. Line segment (21) (Map #21) extends from an existing outfall
along the right-of-way of US 70 in a commercial and residential

area. The 8" sewerline extends 400 LF.
22. Line segment (22) (Map #22) extends from an existing outfall
along a creek which is forest-grass land; then, along existing
street right-of-way into a residential area. The 8" sewer line
extends 4 ,100 LF.
(a) Changes in land
The proposed sewer project in the Town will not have an
immediate effect on land or land use. The lines and the small pump
stations will not have an adverse visual effect.
A secondary impact of the proposed project will be to change
undeveloped areas into developable areas because of the
availability of sewer. This future development will be made
possible because of the sewer lines. All development will be in
accordance with existing zoning ordinances.
(b) Wetlands and Floodplains
A review of National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance
Rate Maps for the Town of Rutherford College show no floodplains in
the proposed project area.
A wetlands delineation has been conducted by Steve Chapin of
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Chapin walked project area
where construction activities from the proposed lines and pump
stations will occur. Mr. Chapin found one small area located on
map #3 in the northeast quadrant of town. A total of less than 0.1
acre of wetlands is located in the project area. A 404 nationwide
permit application as well as a 401 general certification
application has been submitted (see attachment A) .
(c) Prime or unique agricultural lands
There are no prime or unique agricultural lands located in the
Town or project area. Undeveloped areas tend to be forested or
open fields.
Indirect effects on the above areas my occur from future
development since the project area will see growth over the next
twenty years.
(d) Public lands such as parks (state, federal or local)
The proposed elements of the project will not affect public
lands such as parks since there are not any located in the project
area.

(e) Scenic and recreational areas
The proposed project will not affect any of the above areas
since there are not any in the project area.
(f) Areas of Archeological or historical value
A preliminary review of the overall project map by the State
Historic Preservation Office found no properties of architectural,
historic, or archeological significance which would be affected by
the project (see attachment B) .
(g) Air quality
There may be a slight increase in the particulate level during
construction. This will occur from the use of heavy construction
equipment. However, this will abate upon completion of the
project. No large amounts of emissions, including particulate
matter, smoke or steam will be generated by facility operations.
Therefore, no special control measures or permits are required.
(h) Groundwater quality
There will be beneficial impacts on groundwater quality
because of the elimination of failing septic tanks. No adverse
effects are anticipated for any of the elements of the proposed
project.
(i) Nuisance conditions (i.e. odor, noise, etc. )
There may be a slight increase in noise levels during the
construction phase of the project. This will be temporary and will
stop upon completion of the project. The slight increase in noise
levels will occur during day time construction hours. Motors used
at pump stations will be put in enclosures to minimize noise
generated by plant operation.
(j) Shellfish or fish and their habitats
A preliminary review of the overall project map by NC Wildlife
Resources Commission was made in August and September. Stephanie
Goudrieu, Mountain Region Coordinator for Habitat Conservation
Program responded that the project would have minimal impacts on
fisheries and wildlife in the project area (see attachment C) .
With the submission of the 404 Nationwide Permit previously
discussed under Wetlands, this agency and others may comment
further on the project.

(k) Wildlife and their habitats
1 . This project as previously described will install sewer lines
throughout the Town. Many of these will be along DOT right-of-ways
and in developed areas. A more detailed description of the line
work can be found under proposed lines and habitat.
2. The 22 project maps in the attachments clearly show the
specific areas to be affected by the action.
3 . Overall project maps were sent to the Natural Heritage Program
and NC Wildlife Resources Commission for their comments. The
Natural Heritage Program responded conducted a review and sent back
a list of all rare species that occur in Burke County.
4. As previously mentioned, the NC Heritage Program has no record
of known rare species, high quality natural communities or
significant natural areas occurring in the project area. However,
they did enclose a listing of rare species in Burke County (see
attachment D) .
5. The direct effects on species and habitat could mean in some
cases temporary disturbance. However, no rare species have been
recorded in the project area. Indirect and cumulative effects
could occur as a result of sewer service being available in
undeveloped areas and these areas being developed over a period of
time.
6. If Species and critical habitat would exist in the project
area they could be effected during the construction phase of the
project by moving heavy equipment over land, land disturbing
activities and increased noise. The NC Wildlife Resources
Commission has recommended 8 guidelines to minimize impacts to
fisheries and wildlife (see attachment C) .
7. The evaluation criteria consists of preliminary comments by
the NC Wildlife Resources Commission and the Natural Heritage
Program. These two agencies reviewed available literature and
studies on the area. The NC Wildlife Resources Commission felt
that the project would have only a minimal effect on fisheries and
wildlife resources in the project area.
8 . From the comments by the NC Wildlife Resources Commission and
Natural Heritage Program, it can be determined that there will be
a minimal effect to wildlife and habitat in the project area.
Much of the proposed line work will occur on previously
disturbed land and Right-of-ways.
(m) Introduction of Toxic substances
There will not be any toxic substances introduced on this
project.

j;
/
(n) Impacts on receiving waters
During the construction phase of the project, ground will be
disturbed which will result in soil erosion. To minimize this, the
Town will adopt a sedimentation plan as required by the law since
more than 1 acre will be disturbed.
The WWTP in Valdese will not be effected by the waste it will
receive from the project. The quality of the water leaving the
plant will not be effected by this project.
(o) Indirect impacts
Indirect impacts could result in undeveloped land being
developed after the project is completed. This could happen since
the availability of sewer will make the land more attractive for
development.
5. Mitigative Measures
Construction of the proposed project will cause some
environmental impacts that cannot be avoided. However, use of
appropriate control measures and good construction practices will
minimize adverse effects. These impacts during the construction
activity include:
1) Air pollution will occur from dust and engine exhaust
2 ) Some soil erosion will occur.
The mitigation measures designed into this project are as follows:
1) Implementation of temporary and permanent anti-erosion and
sedimentation control measures.
2) Sprinkling of dusty areas during construction to control dust.
3) Land disturbance will be limited to areas required for
construction and operation.
To protect fish and wildlife, the guidelines suggested in the
attachment from NC Wildlife Resources Commission will be followed.
In addition, there will be further guidelines that must be
followed as part of the 404 and 401 certifications.

V.l arhment
,n
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
317 First Avenue, NV!, Hickory, NC 28601 TELE:[phone]
FAX:(704)322-.i991
R.Douglas Taylor December 16, 1994
Executive Director
K.Craig Mayberry
Chairman
Mr. Steve Chapin
Br.V,ceChfurmsner U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Vice Chairman
Room 75, Grove Arcade Building
Secretary Y entary W. e.sr. 37 Batter Park Avenue
s
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
Darryl Whignant
Treasurer
r
Dear Mr. Chapin:
Parry C.Past Chairman
on behalf of the Town of Rutherford College, we would
At-Large: like to request a nationwide permit for the Rutherford
Robert E.Hibbins
Hal W.Kaylor College Sewer Project.
Jack F.Robens
Or.Glenn P.Deal.Sr.
ALEXANDER COUNTY As you recall from your field visit to the Town in
August, you found a small area with 1/10 acre of wetlands. At
BURKE COUNTY that time you stated the Town would need to submit an
CALDWELL COUNTY application for a nationwide permit. I have enclosed an
CATAWBA COUNTY application along with a map showing the 22 outfall areas
that will be constructed along with the area highlighted
BROOKFORD where the 1/10 acre of wetlands exist. This total project
CA)AH'S MOUNTAIN will involve 82 ,000 LF of 8" sewer line along with 5 pump
CATAWBA stations.
CLAREMONT If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
CONNELLY SPRINGS contact me.
CONOVER
DREXEL - Sincerely,
GAMEWELL J �J
GLEN ALPINE "/ 1A
GRANITE FALLS Samuel W. Erwin
Environmental Administrator
HICKORY
HILDEBRAN
HUDSON
LENOIR cc: Ms. Gaynell Donnelly Town of Rutherford College
LONG VIEW Mr. John Dorney NC DEM
MAIDEN Ms. Stephanie Goudrieu NC Wildlife Resources
MORGANTON Ms. Renee Gledhill-Early State Preservation Office
NEWTON
RHODHISS
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE
SAWMILLS
TAYLORSVILLE
The'Nes;aro PieCmom Ceonnil of Govornments does np;Nscnminale on;ire baS.S m race.color.
VALDESE naaonal origin.sex.reliymn aqe fir msab!hly in emplovmenl cr the provision of sar teas.

/M ID; ACTION ID:
�tVationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit tl):
JOINT FORM FOR
W Nationwide
de Dermits that req that uire application for Section uire notification to the 4Sl ieof�at`=
•+!••t:aayDn
PLEASE PRINT.
✓1- Owners Name: _ /�Vl,) o f sf dTf/tr f0/U i 0GG E G�
✓2. Owners Address. P. e ) xpc y p ��Tyr��C�• U
✓3. Owners Phone Number(Home).
(Work): I-� �7� — 4�J'�
✓4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official,address,phone number.
✓5. Location of work(MUST ATTACH MAP). County: l3dR le
Nearest Town or City: /J7lic R i=epv CA G cEG o-
Specific Location (Include road numbers,landmarks,etc.):Zhu yarsr�T wi�� OGGr/R � w U�
TNT c✓d—TGFr,/p ��rn s �.� HE �.
THa/�Ji uP,BR/•��
✓6. Name of Closest Stream/River;
7. River Basin: G 5-la/s,"
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout,SA, HQW,ORW,WS I,or WS 117 YES ( ] NO
✓9. Have any Section 404 ]permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [ j NO ( j
If yes,explain.
✓10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S.,including wetlands,located on project site:
✓11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands,impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated: %n AGc
Total Impacted• �c
SEE OVER --D

~ i Town of Rutherford College
9
_• �.,,\ Wetland Areas •�
CIA . V\
1 �
N.
c
_ JI
i
ZY
a
� .: t �• �• � ill
^•--Ir'I- � ,.,� ��,�.��. 1,

At`arhment
��4fl,
�
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
_ James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
Division of Archives and History
September 27, 1994 William S. Price,Jr.,Director
Samuel W. Erwin
Environmental Administrator
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
317 First Avenue, NW
Hickory, NC 28601
Re: Rutherford College Sewer Project, Burke County,
ER 95-7347
Dear Mr. Erwin:
Thank you for your letter of August 23, 1994, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no properties of
architectural, historic, or archaeological significance which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as currently proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
";.
David Brook !
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807

Attachment
C
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N.Salisbury Street,Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391
Charles R.Fullwood,Executive Director
August 29, 1994
Mr. Samuel W. Erwin
Environmental Administrator
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
317 First Avenue, NW
Hickory, NC 28601
SUBJECT: Rutherford College Sewer Project, Burke County
Dear Mr. Erwin:
This correspondence responds to a request by you for our
review and comments regarding the proposed Rutherford College
Sewer Project in Burke County. Project sponsors propose to
install sewer lines in town and construct four small pump
stations. Many of the sewer lines will be placed along North
Carolina Department of Transportation rights-of-way. No streams
supporting trout will be impacted by the project. The U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers has been contacted for a wetland delineation
of the project area.
Based on information provided and my knowledge of the area,
this project will likely have only minimal impacts to fisheries
and wildlife resources in the project area. However, we may
provide additional comments regarding impacts to streams and
wetlands if a Section 404 Permit is required under the Clean
Water Act.
For your general information, our guidelines for installing
sewer lines to minimize impacts to fisheries and wildlife are as
follows:
1) A 50-foot undisturbed vegetated buffer zone should be left
between streams (except at crossings) and construction
activities. This will minimize sedimentation into streams,
preserve riparian vegetation that stabilizes stream banks,
and maintain a travel corridor for wildlife.
2) In areas where existing development and/or topography
prevent leaving at least a 25-foot undisturbed buffer zone,

Mr. Samuel W. Erwin Page 2 August 29, 1994
extra sedimentation control measures should be placed
between streams and construction activities.' These might
include silt fencing in front of hay bales or brush piles.
3) Stream crossings should be made perpendicular to streams
where possible to minimize impacts to riparian vegetation.
Sewer lines should also be buried in the substrate at stream
crossings or attached to bridges so that fish passage is not
blocked and debris does not collect. Abandoned sewer lines
should be removed where they cross streams.
4) If sewer lines will be encased in concrete at crossings,
this must be accomplished so that wet concrete does not
contact live stream water. This will lessen the chance of
altering the stream's water chemistry and causing a fish
kill.
5) Excavated material should be stockpiled away from streams.
6) Riparian vegetation, especially trees, should be preserved
as much as possible at stream crossings. Trees that must be
removed should be cut near ground level, leaving the stump
and roots in the bank for stability and to possibly sprout.
7) Natural materials should be used as much as possible to
restore stream banks at crossings. Riprap should be limited
to the stream bank below the high water mark, and vegetation
should be used for stabilization above high water.
8) Permanent herbaceous vegetation in disturbed areas should be
planted within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to
provide long term erosion control. We prefer a "seed as you
go" strategy rather than allowing a large amount of soil to
lay bare.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
project. If you have any questions regarding these comments,
please contact me at 704/652-4257 .
Sincerely,
Stephanie E. Goudreau
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
cc: Mr. Chris Goudreau, District 8 Fisheries Biologist
Mr. Jack Mason, District 8 Wildlife Biologist

State of North Carolina a`taDhment
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources JL
Division of Parks & Recreation James B, Hunt, Jr., GovernorCCL� p
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary � C N
Dr. Philip K. McKnelly, Director
September 6, 1994
Mr. Samuel Erwin
Western Piedmont Council of Governments
317 First Avenue Northwest
Hickory, NC 28601
SUBJECT: Rare Species, High Quality Natural Communities, and
Significant Natural Areas in the Proposed Rutherford College
Sewer Project Area, Burke County, NC
Dear Mr. Erwin:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program does not have current
records of known rare species, high quality natural communities, or
significant natural areas occurring in the sewer Rutherford College
project area. To our knowledge, this project area has not been
systematically inventoried and we cannot definitively state that
rare species or significant natural areas do not occur there.
Enclosed is a list of rare species that are known to occur in Burke
County. If suitable habitat for any of these species occurs in the
project area, then those species may be present at the project
site. If it is necessary to be certain that this site does not
contain rare species, a field survey would need to be conducted.
Please contact me at the address below or call me at (919) 733-7701
if you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
`��
Inge Smith
Information Specialist
Natural Heritage Program
/iks
Enclosures
P.O. Box 27687,Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10%post-consumer paper

SCIENTIFIC AND STATE FED. STATE GLOBAL
COMMON NAME PROT. PROT. RANK RANK
*** Burke
** Vertebrates
CORAGYPS ATRATUS SC S3 G5
BLACK VULTURE
CORVUS CORAX SR S3 G5
COMMON RAVEN
CYPRINELLA ZANEMA SR S3 G3?
SANTEE CHUB
FALCO PEREGRINUS E LE S1B,S2 G4
PEREGRINE FALCON
MICROPTERUS COOSAE SR Si G5
REDEYE BASS
NEOTOMA MAGISTER SC C2 S2 G3G4
ALLEGHENY WOODRAT
** Invertebrates
ALASMIDONTA VARICOSA T C2 S2 G3
BROOK FLOATER
ANILLINUS SP 4 SR S? G?
A CARABID BEETLE (from NC, sp D)
BRACHYPANORPA CAROLINENSIS SR S2? G?
SHORT-NOSED SCORPIONFLY
** vascular plants
AGALINIS DECEMLOBA SR S2? G4
PIEDMONT GERARDIA
ASPLENIUM BRADLEYI C Si G4
BRADLEY'S SPLEENWORT
ASTER SHORTII SR Si G4G5
SHORT'S ASTER
BAPTISIA ALBESCENS SR S2 G4
THIN-POD WHITE WILD INDIGO
BOTRYCHIUM LANCEOLATUM VAR ANGUSTISEGMENTUM SR Si G5T4
LANCE-LEAF MOONWORT
BOTRYCHIUM MATRICARIIFOLIUM SR Si G5
DAISY-LEAF MOONWORT
BOTRYCHIUM ONEIDENSE C Si G3G4
BLUNT-LOBED GRAPE FERN
CAMPANULA APARINOIDES SR S2 G5
MARSH BELLFLOWER
DICENTRA EXIMIA SR S2 G4
BLEEDING HEART
ECHINACEA PURPUREA SR Si G4G5
PURPLE CONEFLOWER
FOTHERGILLA MAJOR C S2 G3
LARGE WITCH-ALDER
GEUM RADIATUM E-SC LE Si G1
SPREADING AVENS
HELIANTHUS LAEVIGATUS SR S2 G4
SMOOTH SUNFLOWER
HEXALECTRIS SPICATA SR S2 G4?
CRESTED CORALROOT
HEXASTYLIS LEWISII SR 3C S3 G3
LEWIS'S HEARTLEAF
HEXASTYLIS NANIFLORA E LT S2 G2G3
DWARF-FLOWERED HEARTLEAF

SCIENTIFIC AND STATE FED. STATE GLOBAL
COMMON NAME PROT. PROT. RANK RANK
HUDSONIA MONTANA E LT Si G1
MOUNTAIN GOLDEN-HEATHER
ISOTRIA MEDEOLOIDES E LE Si G2G3
SMALL WHORLED POGONIA
LIATRIS ASPERA SR Si G4G5
ROUGH BLAZING STAR
LIATRIS HELLERI T-SC LT Si G1
HELLER'S BLAZING STAR
LIATRIS TURGIDA SR Si? G3
SHALE-BARREN BLAZING STAR
LONICERA FLAVA SR Si G5?
YELLOW HONEYSUCKLE
MINUARTIA GROENLANDICA C S2 G5
GREENLAND SANDWORT
MONOTROPSIS ODORATA C C2 S2 G3
SWEET PINESAP
OENOTHERA PERENNIS C Si G5
PERENNIAL SUNDROPS
PARTHENIUM AURICULATUM C Si G3?Q
GLADE WILD QUININE
PLATANTHERA PERAMOENA C 3C S1 G5
PURPLE FRINGELESS ORCHID
QUERCUS ILICIFOLIA SR Si G5
BEAR OAK
ROBINIA HISPIDA VAR FERTILIS C Si G5T2
FRUITFUL LOCUST
ROBINIA HISPIDA VAR KELSEYI C Si G5TUQ
KELSEY'S LOCUST
SCUTELLARIA SAXATILIS C 3C Si G4?
ROCK SKULLCAP
STACHYS EPLINGII SR S1 G5
EPLING'S HEDGE-NETTLE
THERMOPSIS FRAXINIFOLIA C S2? G3?
ASH-LEAVED GOLDEN-BANNER
TRICHOPHORUM CESPITOSUM C S2 G5
DEERHAIR BULRUSH
TRILLIUM SIMILE SR Si G3
SWEET WHITE TRILLIUM
VACCINIUM MACROCARPON C S2 G4
CRANBERRY
ZIGADENUS LEIMANTHOIDES C Si G4Q
PINEBARREN DEATH-CAMUS
** Nonvascular plants
CEPHALOZIELLA OBTUSILOBULA C C2 SH GI
A LIVERWORT
CHILOSCYPHUS APPALACHIANUS C C2 Si Gl
A LIVERWORT
CHILOSCYPHUS MURICATUS C Si G5
A LIVERWORT
DICRANUM UNDULATUM SR Si G5
BOG BROOM-MOSS
DREPANOLEJEUNEA APPALACHIANA C Si G2?
A LIVERWORT

SCIENTIFIC AND STATE FED. STATE GLOBAL
COMMON NAME PROT. PROT. RANK RANK
PLAGIOCHILA CADUCILOBA E C2 S1 G2
A LIVERWORT
PLAGIOCHILA SULLIVANTII VAR SPINIGERA C C2 S1 G2T1
A LIVERWORT
PLAGIOCHILA SULLIVANTII VAR SULLIVANTII C C2 S2 G2T2
A LIVERWORT
PORELLA WATAUGENSIS C S1 G1
A LIVERWORT
SPHAGNUM PYLAESII C S1 G4
SIMPLE PEATMOSS
** Natural communities
ACIDIC COVE FOREST S5 G5
CANADA HEMLOCK FOREST S5 G5
CAROLINA HEMLOCK BLUFF S2 G2G3
CHESTNUT OAK FOREST S5 G5
HEATH BALD S3 G4
HIGH ELEVATION ROCKY SUMMIT S2 G2
LOW ELEVATION ROCKY SUMMIT S2 G2
MONTANE ACIDIC CLIFF S3 G4
PINE--OAK/HEATH S4 G5
RICH COVE FOREST S4 G4
ROCKY BAR AND SHORE S5 G5
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN BOG (NORTHERN SUBTYPE) Sl G1T1
SPRAY CLIFF S2 G2
UPLAND POOL S1 G1
WHITE PINE FOREST S2? G?

NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENTS AND SPECIES STATUS CODES
The attached output from the N.C. Natural Heritage Program database is a listing of
the elements (rare species, geologic features, natural communities, and special
animal habitats) known to occur in your geographic area of interest. The
information on this printout is compiled from a variety of sources, including field
surveys, museums and herbaria, literature, and personal communications. The
database is dynamic, with new records being added and old records being revised as
we receive new information. The enclosed list cannot be considered a definitive
record of natural heritage elements, and it should not be considered a substitute
for field surveys. When this information is used in any document, we request that
the printout date be given and that the Natural Heritage Program be credited.
This cover sheet explains the four columns of status codes that are given on the
right-hand side of the printout.
STATE PROTECTION
CODE STATUS CODE STATUS
E Endangered SR Significantly Rare
T Threatened V Vulnerable
Sc Special Concern UNK Undetermined
C Candidate EX Extirpated
P_ Proposed (E, T, or C)
Plant statuses are determined by the Plant Conservation Program (N.C. Dept. of
Agriculture) and the Natural Heritage Program (N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources). E, T, and SC species are protected by state law (the Plant
Protection and Conservation Act, 1979) ; C and SR designations indicate rarity and
the need for population monitoring and conservation action, as determined by the
Plant Conservation and Natural Heritage Programs.
Animal statuses that indicate state protection (E, T, and SC) are published in
"Endangered Wildlife of North Carolina", March 16, 1992, N.C. Nongame and Endangered
Wildlife Program. The Significantly Rare, Undetermined, Vulnerable and Extirpated
statuses are (for the most part) Natural Heritage Program designations. They
indicate rarity and the need for population monitoring and conservation action.
FEDERAL PROTECTION
The current federal status is listed in "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants, July 15, 1991 (50 CFR 17.11 & 17.12, Department of the Interior) .
Definitions are taken from the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended through
the 100th Congress (1988) . and the Federal Register, Part VIII, November 21, 1991
(50 CPR 17, Department of the Interior) .
CODE STATUS DEFINITION
E Endangered A taxon which "is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of its
range"
T Threatened A taxon "which is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future throughout
all or a significant portion of its range"
P_ Proposed A taxon which has been proposed for official
listing as endangered or threatened
L_ Listed A taxon which has been officially listed as
endangered or threatened
Cl Category 1 A taxon which is under consideration, and for
("Candidate 1") which there is sufficient information to support
listing
i

C2 Category 2 A taxon which is under consideration, but for
("Candidate 2") which there is insufficient information to support
listing
3A Category 3A A taxon which was formerly under consideration for
("Candidate 3A") listing, but for which there is "persuasive
evidence of extinction"
3B Category 3B A taxon which was formerly under consideration for
("Candidate 3B") listing, but which current taxonomic understanding
does not support as a distinct entity meeting the
Endangered Species Act's definition of "species"
3C Category 3C A taxon formerly under consideration for listing,
("Candidate 3C") but which has been "proven to be more abundant or
widespread than previously believed and/or [which
is] not subject to any identifiable threat"
GLOBAL AND STATE RANK
These ranks are determined by The Nature Conservancy's system of measuring rarity
and threat status. "Global" refers to worldwide and "State" to statewide.
RANK DEFINITION
G1 Critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or otherwise
very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range
G2 Imperiled globally because of rarity or otherwise vulnerable to
extinction throughout its range
G3 Either very rare and local throughout its range, or found locally in
a restricted area
G4 Apparently secure globally, although it may be quite rare in parts
of its range (especially at the periphery)
GS Demonstrably secure globally, although it may be quite rare in parts
of its range (especially at the periphery)
GH Of historical occurrence throughout its range
GX Believed to be extinct throughout its range
GU Possibly in peril but status uncertain; more information is needed
G? Unranked, or rank uncertain
Q Of questionable taxonomic status
T_ Status of subspecies or variety; the G rank refers to the species as
a whole
State rank codes follow the same definitions, except the words "in the state" should
be substituted for "globally" or "throughout its range." Also, there are four
additional state ranks:
RANK DEFINITION
SR Reported from North Carolina, but without persuasive documentation
_B Rank of the breeding population in North Carolina; used only for
migratory species
N Rank of the non-breeding population in North Carolina; used only for
migratory species
_Z_ Population is not of significant conservation concern; applies to
transitory, migratory species
2/4/93
N.C. Natural Heritage Program P.O. Box 27687
Division of Parks and Recreation Raleigh, NC 27611

.«� Town of Rutherford College
Index Map (showing 22 submaps)
i 2
\ '
00
/ h 1 3
l
t /tom
, 1 -
I
kr
/ �• ..' BlrON6ih
�tij,.
� t.c� � Ara•.�.i�r cc�cc
c
r�
•r fir. L—..
Y, y
UL_ _

� 1
N
m
n
n
n
n
1 p
1 �
in
i Q 1
i \
�� � LWIo Srv7/av
-- ` d

i
-a_ I

i
1
i
e`
i

=0
--•�...,
+'mow

.,.
� spa i
1
. 1 I

1

WN
� ■ ../mot. - _ ..���� _ . .
IF I
Six
Y
1 �
■
r ,
a

.i
4
►�:.:� moo. . N�r��
dill _ � o� .

NIM
u
1 • �� --
-W,15
y

EM
to
d
►ii������ r ���l. N�rf�
_ ` I►�=�� � III������r
Y

1 ' �
s _ r�
�''� ice_ t

REA /_'�

• I
Y
i
• i
i
Y
� � ►GIs.
� ' lp
�

�Y
01
Milo r�lV
ram-
. �M-1 �r
r: J
1 �

►emu � �
wh
Mimi
Vmilli"
MAN d���rr.,r_
IV
�''

\
\
�_ a����i►�_ ���� ��,.
1 �

■ - - _ � ♦�• ems`
r♦ � .
OWNS
op
OR
Owl
r �
■ ■ -- Imppro� .

� , • •f
■ - - - ��� .,.. ems`
OWN
SR mass
WA
�■��� � III������r ���
Now .�
� �, �'✓'" ,ter I
1 r

�at

�f
�i�•
1 �
■ / / O�

♦
NO \fir o
Mm
Mon.i
Imo• ♦ 1!44A .

s .
� �����- �
J
���� �� ��
� ��u�r� , �� o,
�...r� �
.�. !`
� ������� r. 1. r���
- �i�� — i
� /���w��-�'�� .�
� � � ��
�.
._
�� ���
.� ���
a - = � !�
-' �
� 1.
'�
� � � e, ,
Ib- 1 n :/
i� i<1 /
�1.� ry �
c '
';,..�.. .� awry.:
�� .r =� J
�: �„ ��
:r r' r

C .!
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
v. C. n'np
,.
James G. Martin, Governor August 25, 198�0' 0= PLaTtrR Paul,Wilms
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary ''o7D *T� Director
Mr. Zeb Malcolm, MayorC:9t� v'
Town of Rutherford College
P. 0. Box 406
Rutherford College, NC 28671 uAl l' i "' f
SUBJECT: Permit'lNba ;45042 71 f4 Gift.
Town of Rutherfor`1` Cf�11hge
Hilltop, Childers and Pine Streets
Sewer Extension
Burke County
Dear Mayor Malcolm:
In accordance with your application received August 3, 1987, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. 1.5042, dated August 25, 1987, to the Town of Rutherford College
for the construction and operation of the subject wastewater collection system
extensions.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded, and
shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within 30 days following receipt of this permit. This request must be
in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office
Drawer. 11.666, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. Unless such demands are made this permit
shall be final and binding.
One (1) set of approved plans and specifications is being :forwarded to you. I.f
you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Babette
McKemie, telephone No. 919/733-5083, ext. 137.
WV1r iqJne°cP9f s,
Arthur Mouberry
For
R. Paul Wilms
cc: Burke County Health Department 2
Mooresville Regional Supervisor R tJ
Mr.. Dennis Ramsey J
West Avery Associates l�
Pollution Prevention Pays �eJ�
P.O.Box 27697,Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

111 r`�n`

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RALEIGH
P E R M I T
For the discharge of Sewage, Industrial Wastes, or Other Wastes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General
Statutes of North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and
Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Town of Rutherford College
Burke County
FOR THE
construction and operation of approximately 2111 liner feet of 8-inch gravity sewer
to serve Hilltop, Childers and Pine Streets and the discharge of collected domestic
wastewater into the Town of Valdese's existing sewerage system, pursuant to the
application received August 3, 1987, and in conformity with the project plan,
specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development and considered a part of
this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded, and
shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in
accordance with the approved plans, specifications and other supporting data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes
described in the application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all. times.
4. The sewage and wastewater collected by this system shall be treated in the Lake
Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment Plant prior to being discharged into the receiving
stream.
5. This permit is not transferable.
6. Construction of the sewers shall be so scheduled so as not to interrupt service
by the existing utilities nor result in an overflow or bypass discharge of
wastewater to the surface waters of the State.

7. The Permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between the Town of Valdese
and the Town. of Rutherford College for the collection and final treatment of
domestic wastewater is in full force and effect.
Permit issued this the 25th day of August, 1987.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Original Signed By
Arthur Mouberry
''or
R. Paul Wilms, Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. 15042

State of North Carolini
Department of Environioent, IL
alth and Natural Resources
' Division of Environmental Management ?g41
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [D E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 8, 1993
The Honorable Jimmy O.Huffman,Mayor
Town of Rutherford College
P.O. Box 406
Rutherford College, NC 28671
Subject: Permit No. W00008673
Town of Rutherford College
Evangelical Methodist Church
Sewer Extension
Burke County
Dear Mayor Huffman:
In accordance with your application received November 9, 1993, we are forwarding herewith
Permit No. WQ0008673, dated December 8, 1993, to the Town of Rutherford College for the
construction and operation of the subject wastewater collection extension.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Drawer
27447, Raleigh, NC 27611-7447. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
One set of approved plans and specifications is being forwarded to you. If you need additional
information concerning this matter,please contact Mr. John A. Kuske III at 919/733-5083.
Sincerely, (n�
�l1•' ' r/'fj
A. PresUh Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: Burke County Health Department
hwihekviRwRegivnah,Wre
West and Associates,P.A. Wpri
rr i
�i
DEC 14
ACT �{
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] rAX Ji'§ 733 YM 9__
p� An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
WASTEWATER COLLECTION PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143,General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws,Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
The Town of Rutherford College
Burke County
FOR THE
construction and operation of approximately 887 linear feet of 8 inch gravity sewer to serve the Evangelical
Methodist Church, and the discharge of 2,180 GPD of collected domestic wastewater into the Town of
Valdese's existing sewerage system, pursuant to the application received November 9, 1993, and in
conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources and considered a part of this
permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the
application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities must be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. The sewage and wastewater collected by this system shall be treated in the Town of Valdese's Lake
Rhodhiss Wastewater Treatment Facility prior to being discharged into the receiving stream.
5. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change ownership,
or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be submitted to the
Division of Environmental Management accompanied by an application fee, documentation from
the parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this
request will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
6. Construction of the sewers, pump station(s) and force main shall be scheduled so as not to
interrupt service by the existing utilities nor result in an overflow or bypass discharge of
wastewater to the surface waters of the State.
1

7. Upon completion of c nstruction and prior to operation of thi permitted facility, a certification
must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted facility has been
installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting materials. Mail the Certification to the Water Quality Permits and Engineering Unit,
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, NC 27626-0535.
8. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a
minimum of five years from the date of the completion of construction.
9. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the Permittee
to an enforcement action by the Division of Environmental Management,in accordance with North
Carolina General Statute 143-215.6(a) to 143-215.6(c).
10. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all
statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies
(local, state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
11. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions,the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,including those as may be required
by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater collection
facilities.
12. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Asheville Regional Office, telephone number
704/251-6208, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day,
following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of either of the following:
a. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility
incapable of adequate wastewater transport, such as mechanical or electrical failures of
pumps, line blockage or breakage, etc.; or
b. Any failure of a pumping station or sewer line resulting in a by-pass directly to receiving
waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within
15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions taken or
proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
13. This permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between the Town of Rutherford College
and the Town of Valdese for the collection and final treatment of wastewater is in full force and
effect.
Permit issued this the 8th day of December, 1993
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
n /l
A. Preston oward, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0008673
2

Permit No.WQ0008673
December 8, 1993
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina,having been authorized to observe (periodically,weekly,full time) the construction of the
project, , for the
Project Name Location
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities,due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of this permit,the approved plans and specifications,and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
3

Permit No. WQ0009685
August 31, 1994
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
I, Chester R. West as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the
Town of Rutherford College Town of Rutherford College
project, Perkins Rd. Sewer Ext. Burke County for the
Project Nance Locution
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation
of the constructio ch that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of this pe e appr plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature Registration No. 6281
'' 1/�y1 D•�II
Date October 9, 1995 ( m``,`��� CARp1��,
SS
t 2 SEAL
6'281
e
AAanagen' �therebets
mental ine
d accepf this���
he D v'sto�ofr alto tance O
T
"ledges YeCe'�tCertificatiol"
acknO
rt�r~^�rT
3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources ,
Division of Water Quality
Jaynes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor '~`'��SL
A�
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary ED G C ^ , F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director , V
April 20, 1998
JIMMY O.HUFFMAN,MAY
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE, TOWN-CDBG
PO BOX 406
RUTHERFORD COLL, NC 28671
Subject: CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
PERMIT NO. WQ0013599
RUTHERFORD COLLEGE, TOWN-CDBG
BURKECOUNTY
Dear Permittee:
On March 20, 1997 the Division of Environmental Management issued you the subject permit. One of the
conditions of the subject permit read as follows:
Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility,a
certification must be received from a professional engineer certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with the requirements of this permit and the
approved plans and specifications. Mail certification to the Permits and Engineering
Unit, P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh N.C., 27626-0535.
To date, our records show that no certification has been received for the subject permit. If the permitted
facility has been constructed and placed into operation please submit the required certification immediately.
Operation of the treatment system prior to submission of the required certification is in violation of your
permit and is subject to enforcement action. If you have any questions, please contact consulting engineer
for this project, WEST & ASSOCIATES, PA at [phone]. If the facility has not been constructed,
please contact the Asheville Regional Office at [phone], so that they can update their records.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
m�Colson, P.E., Supervisor
State Engineering Review Group
cc: Asheville Regional Office
File
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh,North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX[phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper