20030780 Ver 1_Complete File_20030624

o?4F WA TF'4QG William G. Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
?? W)
r
>
o <
DWQ Project No.: U -$ a -? '5 u
Applicant:
Project Name: 5 ?- Z4 S-9-
County: L.1 A l6y-
U5 6
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: 9.1(-03
ncnr-2
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1621. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to
send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, '7--A/ C. Al,?A/,-P_ , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent o e 1 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and o er suppo a ials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification
hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project,for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Registration No.
Date
SAT ?R4G
Michefel F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
j Division of Water Quality
Q .t Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
August 11, 2003
Wake County
DWQ Project No. 030780
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Nance:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in
0.10 acres of wetlands for the purpose of improving SR 2655 from US 64 to the end of state maintenance in Wake
County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated June 23, 2003. After reviewing
your application, we have. decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3404.
This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you
should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not
limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval
will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748
AT?R
QG
F
Michafel F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
c:\ncdot\SR 2655\wgc\03o780wgc.doc
Sincerely,

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
6(Z3(b3
TO: - REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
ff
3-

,.
0
FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
Cl Morr
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE - ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ?FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION INVESTIGATE AND. REPORT
COMMENTS:
GROUP
JUN 2
zOp
ante?
030780;

WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
'Uty 2 4 2003
???.?• BITER
AM SECTION
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
June 23, 2003
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. John Dorney
Coordinator
030780
Subject: Secondary road improvements to SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road) from US
64 to end of state maintenance in Wake County.
NCDOT Work Order No. 6.402152
Reference: NCDOT permit application (June 23, 2003)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to complete
secondary road improvements to SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road) from US 64 to end of
state maintenance in Wake County. Construction of the project will necessitate impacts
to waters of the United States. Application was made for a Department of the Army
Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401
Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3404 and isolated wetland permit in an
application dated June 23, 2003.
An automated payment procedure has recently been implemented between the
NCDOT and NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the Division to apply for the 401
WQC without submitting a check for this permit application. This new procedure will
provide payment to the NCDWQ by charging the permit application fee directly to the
appropriate NCDOT work order.
The NCDOT work order for this Droiect is 6.402152. Proiect impacts are less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 linear feet
cumulative impacts to streams, _therefore. _Dlease note that a fee of $200.00 is reauired for
this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Christopher A. Murray, P.W.S. PA YMEN T
Environmental Officer RECEIVED
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
Z J
TO: - REF. NO.. OR ROOM, BLDG.

FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
C.
rcJ«
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME - ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER - - - ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS.
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE -? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION _ ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
V"Celur ?uei eS o``" 5. ?e Q ?a?c>Sryp?.?
03 07 8 0"
*7MS/401 MoUp

STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
JUN 2 4 2003
NATEAQUAMSECRON
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
June 23, 2003
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120 Raleigh, NC 27609 . 030780
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Secondary road improvements to SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road) from US
64 to end of state maintenance in Wake County.
NCDOT Work Order No. 6.402152
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to upgrade
and pave SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road) from US 64 to end of state maintenance in Wake
County (Figures 1-2). Total project length is 0.8 miles. Transportation and highway laws
of North Carolina (G.S. 136-44.6, 13644.7, 13644.7A, 13644.8, and 136-44.9) require
the NCDOT to develop annual work programs for construction and maintenance of
secondary roads. These general statutes specifically set forth requirements for annual
construction and paving of existing unpaved roads. Paving of these roads is performed in
priority order as established by the NCDOT for each unpaved road within a given county.
This number is based on characteristics of each road, including number of homes,
schools, churches, businesses, industries, recreational facilities, traffic counts, presence of
school bus routes, and value as a thoroughfare. SR 2655 is scheduled to be paved in the
2002-2003 Secondary Roads Construction Program.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Wetland delineations were conducted using the field delineation method outlined
in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory,
1987). U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Data Forms and a North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Wetland Rating Forms are attached to this
application. Four sites are located within the project limits.
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
2
Site 1-Station 24+34 to 28+55-Lt-
The' project crosses an emergent-nonpersistent wetland that can more accurately
be described as a wet roadside ditch (Photograph 1 and Figure 3). Permanent impacts at
this site include 0.05 acre fill in wetlands. The wetland has a DWQ wetland rating of 13.
Site 2-Station 29+40 to 29+75-Rt-
The project crosses an isolated forested wetland (Photograph 2 and Figure 3).
Permanent impacts at this site include 0.01 acre fill in wetlands. The wetland has a DWQ
wetland rating of 12.
Site 3-Station 37+50 to 38+62-Rt-
The project crosses an isolated forested wetland (Photograph 3 and Figure 4).
Permanent impacts at this site include 0.02 acre fill in wetlands. The wetland has a DWQ
wetland rating of 12.
Site 4-Station 37+00 to 38+50-Lt- and Station 39+00 to 40+00-Lt-
The project crosses an isolated emergent-nonpersistent wetland that can more
accurately be described as a wet roadside ditch (Photograph 4 and Figure 4). Permanent
impacts at this site include 0.02 acre fill in wetlands. The wetland has a DWQ wetland
rating of 11.
Riparian Buffer
Site 1-Station 24+34 to 28+55-Lt-
The Soil Survey of Wake County (1970) depicts a stream crossing at this site.
However, the most recent version of the Knightdale (USGS, 1993) topographic map does
not indicate a stream crossing at this site. Ms. Debbie Edwards (NCDENR-DWQ)
conducted a site visit on June 23, 2003 and indicated that the system is not present in the
field, and is therefore not subject to the riparian buffer rule.
Site 3-Station 37+50 to 38+62-Rt-
The Soil Survey of Wake County (1970) depicts a stream crossing at this site.
However, the most recent version of the Knightdale (USGS, 1993) topographic map does
not indicate a stream crossing at this site. Ms. Debbie Edwards (NCDENR-DWQ)
conducted a site visit on June 23, 2003 and indicated that the system is not present in the
field, and is therefore not subject to the riparian buffer rule.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands not affected by the project will be protected from
unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or storage of
construction supplies will be allowed in wetlands.
Minimization: The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at
jurisdictional sites. Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the
Environmental Officer during construction to minimize impacts at this site.
Compensatory Mitigation: Construction of the project will result in only minimal
impacts to waters of the United States. Impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible during the design process. Due to minimal impacts,
compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts will not be provided for this project.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened,
Proposed endangered ad Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7
and Section 9 of the ESA. As of January 29, 2003, there are four federally protected
species listed for Wake County. They include bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and
red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides boralfs). Biological Conclusions of No Effect have
been rendered for each species.
Historical Compliance
Historic compliance work to be scheduled and concurrence with Historic
Preservation Office will be obtained if required.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to upgrade and pave SR 2655 in Wake County. Construction
impacts are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Impacts to wetlands.
Site Station Fill in Wetlands
1 24+34 to 28+55-Lt- 0.05 Acre
2 29+40 to 29+75-Rt- 0.01- Acre d? a C
3 37+50 to 38+62-Rt- 0.02,Acre
4 37+00 to 38+50-Lt- and 39+00 to 40+00-Lt- 0.02 Acre
Total 0.09 Acre
Note:
-Total wetland impacts do not equal the sum impacts within each wetland due to rounding of significant
digits.
-Sites 2, 3 and 4 are characterized as isolated wetlands.
V / / I 1P '?-o 0 le)
4
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14. Application is also made for NCDENR-DWQ Section
401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3404 for Site 1 and NCDENR-DWQ
Isolated Wetland Permit for Sites 2, 3 and 4. A pre-construction notification is attached
with this request. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
k Christopher A. Murray, P.W.S.
Division Environmental Officer
cc: -Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Brandon Jones, NCDOT District Engineer, Raleigh
Mr. Jerry Linder, NCDOT County Maintenance Engineer, Wake Co.
r

• ? 1 t'
i y
{II ,
_ .I
S ` J `a
t
/ IS A A4 f '+ 1 W
;o
r
fr t ?.? i- }I •1.328'
r ?- - ! 1T•, r •
I \r
T r ?? I , $JZ??i r} ?,
+t l Whitley l
r ------- =?1 "' T i
L/ L
Begin Project rVIC
"-'?/'•`? L? ` / t ! ???.• j _,__ ?.! I L'Qj'1 -? 5 {?.?,G, Imo`-' i `? r' i
114
SITE 4 - { t I • ?' ??,.

?--SITE 3
/en X11-Kttig lJd?le /, j? ?s` fl f?i J ! i , \J i ??? V W1 k
it SITE 2 1
SITE 1
J
IL Q-
'? _ 'i' l ?' II lrfl ,11 I,?.I,r? ?i
3 alI
End Project ?-77 ?_? ' • ,
/i;i( r / ti . t v 2 b ffl. ` 31[ : , J.
17
4j 'S4 i V, t? I
1 BB r _
jr,
' t,
J Y/ /'1

it
I i
I
1 /J ?/ J I
+° ' -
c

r
?
t
i0

D,
r. ft,
Project Study Area
Secondary Road Improvements to
SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road)
Wake County
Knightdale Topo Map (USGS, 1993)
1"=2000'

(loins sheet 42) WAKE COUNTY,
N
ORTH CAR,
t va82 ioC YaC2 7 ,.;. m APC2 ApB2 A
B
DUB Cn
hZ f ApB2
• <o X04, ?oG
^
?\ " ApB2 t Cn ApB U AP62 ?'; ;.
Y £ GC L
b
? CZ (
A ` • Y
?
??
o
j P
a ! APB
j DUB lCAer L DUB
?

??,., r: e
? - - LO D
°

4

.
Y--
Lob W6
?' a +r. f

LOD

ft AP82 n-
f.
n. Q U B
p „z I -
nt ?#' '? AgC2
?.? , ?• N
v ?r v ;Ap82
?r
' iVle
4 ` r LOC :t r, F1 ?, LbC
° m A
P ?

P? ApD
a
G y 4
Me• ApB o
CaiP cL 3 DuB t
-Me. me
v. ?? App We
o B /,R
I APB ti ( y v Y s LoB r' OF APB VC
F> Q _1 `L LoC ; WkE; r APBZ at
Ap6
?/ Q ate" I EtD ,? 06 i `;! t i o- i ApC2
s ; qp Pp APC2 DUB
ApC2 LoBv v APC PA ?,> i :.ftVmE? `
y Q? ApB2 I 9Q APB2
`o@ K ?? P U s ti o.. yv 3s. PCB' u, %pB2
0 o • `? ?i Cti ' ?, Cn .,DUB ,
/ m APB
?' We
A
y ?
PB? t aB Begin Project
lszlmile ? ? o ? ? Cry ? ` - ? ., .?. s' Ap D• "-; ?"'" ? ? ? ? ?ta9' ,ti ? ?
> APB2; V? Me
t
Wo - A APC2 eta v ?` i ?. ?
€ Q w'
a :.?:.
y ?p t v Me? 11 P 2 APC2 II
ApC2 ' ?ra LdG ''`? AP 2 0 411
x g1i62
k M _ Lo . o,. SITE` SITE 3
? '. v ? t. ?w f? v?pQC ? 6 i O me ??/ ?'??. + k 9 • ? II
% 1-
tC a O 3 a APBZ fir'. i, S _
} i !i II
9k ?. Loc •?6-' ?. II
APdh; `s ? ? ? n ,? ' • I
..-. is . R Vr r,"4
81
"OM?PB2 1 1
APC2 LOG j "
LoCti
M C
\ ^ ' s Q Gu
APBZ
p r =ae. ApC2 ?.
F
ApC LoC ' \'?
- PB2 ` ? APB2 , Ac
Strip I..
SITE 1 °?` £' apBZ ca p
bC s,? 6 `?'f 4 r _ 3` ,+c" PO it`d
ApB 'AP .J
4- End Project % t
cx-..
q '11AP6 DUB
P ?, u i
"APC2
/ ti r+ F' •?? Ap
APB2 >j
Q:. ApB IAGC
APC2` ApC2 y9QC2 \i D? B
3?: Ap6? `(t o ?
(Joins sheet 62)
APD APC2 °.
N
Q)
00.62
00.9Z
(I)- 00-LZ

OZ•9Z
00.92
A
C
O
0)
C
O N -
00.9Z
U (n
L
a
Q.? ?N O
co
cp 0 0 ° c
-w-+ L
U? OV)
D ?
vYH
c LO
U cO
N
r
(n
--}OZ-4Z.- .
/ \ \
s11 w"l poob \
/ IanoJ0 6ui15ix3 \
/sliwil M08 11 09 pasodoid
i
i
T
TZ
l?
N
U
4i 4-'
O
OO.Ot
OO-62
Q?
00.82
00-LC
i /sl!wl-l pool
lanoa0 6u!}s!x3
SI!Lu!? M0?j 3b 09 p.osodo.id
7D ?
CY N
N
U L
O Q) O
n -+-E
-U?C- C-
C- N O O U
p U
U N
U
Ln Cn N
O L L
U Q0
N p?
Cn

e , 3
Photograph 1. Emergent-non persistent wetland at Site 1.
Photograph 2. Forested wetland at Site 2.
{r_,
t4 2

AN
1 ' ?"• h?+?f? • r
-4 2`003 y?. 1
Photograph 3. Forested wetland at Site 3.

A
n _vie
J?.Y Y J` '??*.
'? . " '?? air ?i' •S ?l?S;t??• .D i,t > ??? r. ??1S ?i.5 ?s?.-:
'JUG
lw?
Photograph 4. Emergent-non persistent wetland at Site 4.
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 5R 26sS- 9 5; sk, S 2? . Date: 6N (J T
Applicant?Owner: A/c-poi County: w4kk
Investigator: C. a r? State: • ,v
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: ) E e 1
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes (1,0 Transect ID: c,.,e+ 1?.,.9.
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes t Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
I Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ac wt 9.
2. (
C-r14 5 (2 • 1 -- 10.
??1
3. Actr- 0.H _
c JS FAr 11.
4.&cc, $15 ?RG 12.
5Z-Ico p.+S .5 14 - 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are.OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). [oO ?.?
Remarks:
5 g
P e c•' e af- S: f C
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_ Other _-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: O (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
S
`(j
i
?
(
er
es and Phase):
-) rS
\cL-t L 4 ? o "/t/ Drainage Class:

T
S Feld Observations
axonomy (
ubgroup): ?c Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-t0 !o-10-!S ? ?`tRS`(? co.-....?w?d+S 6 ..4-
P-Q (o-t RSI I Ic-?R4?6 co?.?w^??:sh•.cf- e(«.,(,?a .,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
r41eyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
F}?c9r?c 5?` cat- SPte
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Y No
Hydric Soils Present? es No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? No
Remarks:
W e+ ?Gn9 Cl P`-' a r'-t ekr S cis P ?z°se ?, ri

Approvea Dy HUUSALt Z/yl
3
1
3,
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: SV-1645- ? S,Stc?S 'a Date: 045103
Applicant/Owner: /VCO6I County:
Investigator: C. rrc? State: ?Uc
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Ce N Community ID: 5.4t-
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Transect ID: vpty,&
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes IO Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
I Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.Q?.n?Stc,a?n. FAQ 9.
2. L. ciUllQa w.lr?.ar S F+-traC, ? .. T }FC+- 10.
3. I?+h o S " ivy rl s c?i- 11.
4, I!?Qaiuriur Cc?pilli?el,y.?. ?' F/4 12.
5- Crc.+a?a?S.S
0 13.
6. Tasc&(te?tn?vnC?ul.r9-.c IFAc- 14.
7. U( eigj c.MQ/i fane? IPAc?J 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are.OBL, FACW or FAC
6 -7
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
ecsP> 4f- Sife
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other -saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
..
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper .12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wt}`??c?Col?S.t,•s r??t' f/tSe.?'f- caf Sc?
SOILS
Map Unit Name n
(Series and Phase): AgpiIAe- y ..,..,0 1?-/ 0`7- 5 1,5pe C;brainage Class: l.J

T
? Field Observations
axonomy (Subgroup):
, a u oft Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

c(a? )met-L'
cl-lz ?- ro y27/ 3 to 'aR-` 1 to...,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 6s No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
tv? Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ?Po
Remarks:
J?JA-wll-
Approveo by HQU5AGE 2/9Z

z..
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 5 ?- Z6SS 3 S..s ?cr s Date: 4-.4-? 614(33
Applicant/Owner: ,v.Lfl ?- County: t9? ?.A.I!4,
Investigator: C. M,,r?.. Stater -v c.
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?
No Community ID: S 4
?Y€
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? s 40 Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes P Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. TcV1CQ #1&an (- - r ,T- V ?'RC 9.
2. Ater IJ4?(JM ?_ 14-c- 10.
3. L• ?IdLrlcar„Srwr-S+-ir-g c. 11.
4. ul v..,s gMSl? C.nn.. ?!l C??l 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
L o
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
c c, ? 1 ?-f- ? tI c
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other /Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines

Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
we+1 M9. ??tJcbtoQ,.l ?vio?eA
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Q (^ 54? 1
- 04w Z- 1Qr T1 0pa Drainage Class: W?
-
-

Taxonomy (Subgroup): " c- ? ?
Field Observations
?,, ctJ? ?S Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
.?...,..? j 5 6^.C4-
?Z? (Oy2S'?( __(d"t25'ta Cc9r+r.Jn???S'ITKU' C?0.',??4``.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? --/ No
Hydric Soils Present? Zs No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (T No
Remarks: v
(0e Q? qll ?run•e?crS cc?? P?p?p?7- 4t' Si .

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 7t- Z6s-5S 5 5.5 5 e.,& Date: 6/ti?o_?
Applicant/Owner: ,uCb tt- County: L,,Akc
Investigator: C.r-kjrr f .K State: . -41 L
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ot:EFl No Community ID: 2
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes to Transect ID: vpt
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes '@J
- Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
I Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1.10Y11e Q^S'r4A r-ISCar"s A•c. 9.
2. P, A v'S "kt e T FA-c- lo.

4.l/o+Cc?A&,%,%S? s15 ?- 12.
5. Acer ruJn rj,4, T _AC__ 13.
6 41 olu k kaAA~- 5'i." rn c . k^Acir 14.
7.1-; r. e, l e,9?u A +,A, , Per o kht _ 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are.OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). .
Remarks:
t
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs Inundated
_
_ Other -saturated in Upper 12 Inches
" No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.1 2 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
wef(a nom` «c?? ?f` Si?'e•
SOILS
Map Unit Name n
(Series and Phase): A' Qlt i1_ .' on?y , 'j - b 9e s13op Drainage Class: L.J?)

Taxonomy (Subgroup): 1G N?, Field Observations
??? Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
o-2 2.c 'lS 1 Z 5; g,L-A? o-L .ti

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
AJv^- ?-t?r?c S o,` ti' Std
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Iw (1910)
Hydric Soils Present? Yes o Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Remarks:

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: S Q- 26S',5- 3 5.5 fe's Q Date: 6 t141 03
Applicant%Owner: Jj c_'1 5t- County: ?. 41-c-
Investigator: C. h-% orr State: N C
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? rqg No Community ID: to '-A<
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? '7 -es Transect ID: 4 J- t?
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(if needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
I
I 1
M ? (0.,C S ?
? ?'
9.
2.?uH tnAQA?rJi f?.cRAS ? /TC 10.

4.t.i 6.J.9a.n.?v S ?tro?t` ?
- r .7_ - 12.
S. V
1w4,S ?elFw?'y cnM -C t.,nd I A-c- 13.
14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are.OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). t w a
Remarks:
? e
h?a?,,pktih? SPe<r??fi- S,?e
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
Aerial Photographs •- Inundated
_
Other
_
Z 77 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Rec
orded Data Available -Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: /'Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
t% Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: ( (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (9 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
'ev1 Q 4Ai__ ?t SI 4C-
SOILS
Map Unit Name /'
(Series and Phase): Ca a C"C S ",111
k ,o o.-N Drainage Class:
-
Field Observations
11
Taxonomy (Subgroup): J frn
u u Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0--L ld.l2S'( t (0'125-14 -t ev?c?iSr??cif' $11.4-1 % r- oft' `ma..%
-k Z- 2.7`1 S?Z 10-tt"1k% w.y1yiI,nc+ oah
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_,::?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
H`1''cL- S %,\ a1- S, b2
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 41es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? Y No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? 'e No
Remarks:
It ApproV80 Dy MUU1A" WIVZ

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 5L L65S 5,?a-roc ??. Date:
Applicant%Owner: Lp c uT- County: w4 ft
Investigator: c_ r-?NC State: - ,U c.
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? No Community ID: 61,?t

Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes _
Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
I Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. M` e.Y . ®. V 9.
2. ?C)X'r., #^Are n rcAe ,=:? . V V$C 10.
3. A r c r (J"1'),' T_ IF Ac. 11.
pp
4. /
.
t c1?, ry a,.?•,r- St_1fyk c, r-
L? k ? AC t
12.
,,
nn
5. KJCrc ???laEG FA-co 13.
6. 01 m.6 _Fa" i.- 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are .OBL, FACW or FAC
?
(excluding FAC-). t
Remarks:
p t
Qf.tval•t?1eC e)'r? ?c.??J(??-. tce ?p'??PS a'}? Si ?'?
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_ Other -saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_ No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
t
eu,e c'+_ 4t St fL
SOILS
Map Unit Name //??
(Series and Phase):!Yp0l 12r.' S-%-.1'_j Q')
S'?R_q, Drainage Class:
r-
Taxonomy (Subgroup): -l ' ' 1 }4 1 n ,
v v Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
..S2Z 2`5??1 5 ( 5•.?... (o?+.?
Z-[Z?- to..n-?(IZ -2-5X6(3 C? ..,??1 cl?••?l?g-..

Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors - Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
\\
uon-?K1?? < S s?) C-t-
51 t4
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Es
No
(Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? o
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes 14"D
Remarks:
W {?- ??? 9
Approved by HQUSACE /
3

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: 52-ZC'S S -? ?O , Date:
Applicant?Owner: N C.-L-" ?"?k County: wA, &
Investigator: State: IVc
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Fes N Community ID: s te site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? o Transect ID: Ue+
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1
J?
T
S e 9
.
, J
v i.r..?5 p c .
2. Ca r e.R tea. 1-4- - 10.
3.
4. 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are.OBL, FACW or FAC
(excluding FAC-). CU o
Remarks:
Qr??wlv?ce ?"-
(? ra
SDec,eS ?-?- S;+p--
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs Inundated
_ Other
N _
-saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_
o Recorded Data Available -Water Marks
Drift Lines
_
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.12 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: O (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
w
SOILS
Map Unit Name ?+ r
(Series and Phase): l o ?,< 5 f -D-::j
,
? n Drainage Class: 5 P-D
.
Taxonomy (Subgroup): J? 4,
; v??? t Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.

?? Z h t o 7 R- ?? I (? t 2 S v (o .. ?.anr ?4.-z _h r ?--f ?- r ?, t (.o ti
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
?Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
IL ?4-
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? No
Hydric Soils Present? a No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ?JLJ No
Remarks:
Approved by HQUSACE /
.' -0
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
0 987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: S ?- Z6s5 9 S,r,}c(-S Q? . Date: 6 4((03
Applicant%Owner: rU C.i?dy" County: t_a .41a2
Investigator: c , mo rrcx'-x _ State: Al
( 11
Commu
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? SSS4
nity ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1, /•1 Fe,--T rh r'4y,_ g.
2. Arer r.-co- r/Ic 10.
3. 7-0y,t a& -f ^&,j^ P/1-c- 11.
4. Lie}?rrrAG,.?C% -S}tirtc C. r(.ly'F- )~ 12.
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
a. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC
LIM (90
(excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
-Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs _ Inundated
_ Other -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper.1 2 Inches
_ Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Lie?,.? P
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): !'I DD?1:l'- 5c"'i" ??SI04z _ Drainage Class:
H -yo Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): _i D'c -yo ? Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
inches Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
S-1 Z c (G-t (? 5w.
10,1 (Lt 13 2?5 -? 6 (3 4-ew, ai.s
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_ Sulfidic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ? No (Circle)
(Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes NOO
Remarks:
JU??I-w e-i-?ov?9 ,

WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version,,,
(9,057-
Project Name:
Nearest road: `t R- Z(,sS
County: w AV g- Wetland area: c s Wetland width: L( feet

Name of evaluator: C• M' f 2!t Date:
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
Adjacent land use (within 1/: mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
? forested/natural vegetation `t %
/ agriculture, urban/suburban S S%
/ impervious surface %
within interstream divide
? other: C of e? -.., a\ c
Soil series W - ?Skck - .
predominantly organic
(humus, muck, or peat)
predominantly mineral
(non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
? ditched or channelized
- total riparian wetland width > 100 ft
Cc o ?9 5.d?t SAC/ -
Dominant vegetation
2)
Flooding and wetness
_?semipermanently to permanent4y flooded
or inundated o r S a ru ro, _ seasonally flooded or inundated
_ intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
- no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin arolin Ba
Bog forest Other .+ lac t
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels.
R Water Storage l x 4.00 =
A Bank/Shoreline Stabilization x 4.00 = n
T Pollutant Removal x 5.00 = 5 Total Score
I Wildlife Habitat y x 2.00 = 0
13
N Aquatic Life x 4.00 = Li
G Recreation and Education x 1.00 = o
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within 1/i mile radius.
WETLAND RASING WORKSHEET Fourth Version ..

C`D 1
Project Name: 51- 5 S / Nearest road:? (LZ6
S 5?
County: k,, Ak?g Wetland area: q acres Wetland width: 3 S' feet
Name of evaluator: C. Nlo r ( ??9? t,-Q V. C- -- Date:
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
_Y_ other: 4F--
i')
ol4
Soil series A p?\? Su..?_•-?? a a.-.
predominantly organic
(humus, muck, or peat)
predominantly mineral
(non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
_ ditched or channelized
- total riparian wetland width > 100 ft
Adjacent land use (within'/2 mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
forested/natural vegetation ? o %
agriculture, urban/suburban S5" %
? impervious surface %
Dominant vegetation
1) Ace r rJan w A,
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded
?or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated w 5%t-
intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other W.n?wec? W eA-J .
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels.
R Water Storage V x 4.00 = C)
A Bank/Shoreline Stabilization 0 x 4.00 = (?
T Pollutant Removal x 5.00 = 5 Total Score
1 Wildlife Habitat x 2.00 = _41?
! Z
N Aquatic Life c x 4.00 = {
G Recreation and Education x 1.00 =
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within %2 mile radius.
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version _
S " 1-,3
f t;,oZ
Project Name: earest road: _S 2-Z6 S
County: v_,N Wetland area: eco (9
s Wetland width: (o feet
Name of evaluator: ?- K-,r 1 6Date:
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
_ other: %stot?. k ?-
Soil series
predominantly organic
humus, muck, or peat)
V predominantly mineral
(non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
Hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
_ ditched or channelized
- total riparian wetland width > 100 ft
Adjacent land use (within l% mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
forested/natural vegetation 49%
agriculture, urban/subxban
impervious surface
Dominant vegetation
1)_ A r l??(o ti..
3) ?
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded
or inundated
_f seasonally flooded or inundated SQf -r--f
_ intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest sj:= Other _15.1 u -c?
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels.
..............._ ........-.....................................................-...............-..............................
R Water Storage E_
x 4.00 = ?
A Bank/Shoreline Stabilization _ 0 x 4.00 = _ o
T Pollutant Removal ( x 5.00 = Total Score
1 Wildlife Habitat -L x 2.00 = 2 t9 t2-
N Aquatic Life ! x 4.00 = tj
G Recreation and Education x 1.00 =
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within %i mile radius.
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version
Project Name: 11- Z6 SS 3 ?? % &/ Nearest road: 5 2 26 575 --
County: County: L.&/A 6e Wetland area: k1 Lacres Wetland width: feet
Name of evaluator: (' 1`'? ?rrcry? Date:
Wetland location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other:
Soil series Co I r. 4n k-, ?•--
predominantly organic
(humus, muck, or peat)
predominantly mineral
(non-sandy)
predominantly sandy
hydraulic factors
_ steep topography
_ ditched or channelized
_ total riparian wetland Width> 100 ft
Adjacent land use (within 'A mile upstream,
upslope, or radius)
forested/natural vegetation 5-0/o
agriculture, urban/suburban S o %
_ impervious surface %%
Dominant vegetation
1) Tf%-•5 e ?5?$
2 (are ?,D•
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently flooded
or inundated ,/ 5c-t--l• A
_ seasonally flooded or inundated
_ intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
_ no evidence of flooding or surface water
Wetland type (select one)
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocosin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Y- Other %f a- e, cf,+ p I,,
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels.
R Water Storage
A Bank/Shoreline Stabilization
T Pollutant Removal
I Wildlife Habitat
N Aquatic Life
G Recreation and Education
x 4.00
x 4.00 =
I ' x 5.00 =
c x 2.00 = 'L
x 4.00 = `f
x 1.00 =
Total Score
(t
'Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within '/? mile radius.
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 030780
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ® Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification (Site 1) (Sites 2, 3 and 4)
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT Division 5, Christopher A. Murray
Mailing Address: 2612 N. Duke St., Durham, NC 27704
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
Page 5 of 12
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Secondary Roadway improvements to SR 2655 (Three Sisters Road) from
US 64 to end of state maintenance in Wake County
2. T T.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Work Order: 6.402152
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Knightdale
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Knightdale, travel east on
US 64 to project limits.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):_ Site 1: 35.796WM 78.43503°W.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 5.8 acre (Project is 0.8 mi long)
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Nearest body of water is
intermittent tributary to Marks Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is surrounded by wooded land, commercial
development and junk yards.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Grade.
drain, pave and erosion control at project. Eq_uinment may include excavator, backhoe,
bulldozer, grader and crane.
Page 6 of 12
I 1. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The project is part of the 2002-2003 secondary
road paving program. The existing gravel roadway will be paved with asphalt
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Site l: The proposed project
will impact 0.05 acre of an emer ent-nonpersistent wetland Site 2• The proposed proiect
will impact 0.01 acre of isolated forested wetland Site 3• The roposed project will impact
0.02 acre of isolated forested wetland Site 4• The proposed project will impact 0.02 acre of
isolated emergent-nonpersistent wetland
Page 7 of 12
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
1 Mechanized Fill 0.05 No 300 ft Emergent
2 Mechanized Fill 0.01 No 300 ft Isolated forested
3 Mechanized Fill 0.02 No 550 ft Isolated forested
4 Mechanized Fill 0.02 No 550 ft Isolated emergent
- List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at hqp://vv\viv.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.09 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.09 acre
NOTE: Total wetland impacts do not equal the sum impacts within each wetland
due to rounding of significant digits.
3. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact Length of Average Width Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
indicate on ma linear feet) Before Impact lease specif
N/A
N/A
List each impact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wtivNv.us,s.aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., ., -w.topozone.com,
,Aw%v.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: N/A
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
of Impact*
Type Area of
Impact
Name
Wate Type of Waterbody

pond
sound
(lake
estuary

indicate on imp)
(acres) (if
applicable) ) ,
,
,
,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A
Last each unpact separately and identity temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to:, fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 12

5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
All wetlands not affected by construction will be protected from unnecessary encroachment
during; construction. The side slope of the jurisdictional sites has been steepened to the
maximum extent possible. Strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection
of wetlands and surface waters will be enforced during construction. Only the smallest amount
of fill necessary to complete the project will be placed in waters of the United States.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
Page 9 of 12
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.htmi.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreagellinear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes El No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
Page 10 of 12
r • T.
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3 N/A
2 1.5 N/A
Total N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B.0242 or.0260.
N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss storrawater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existing: 2.9 acre impervious surface (30 foot wide gravel road) of 5.8 acre total moiect size.
Proposed: 1.9 acre impervious surface (proposed 20 foot wide asphalt paved road) of 5.8 acre
total project size. The erosion control plan for the project is designed for 900 cubic feet of
storage per acre. Erosion and sediment control devices along the project are comprised of
temporary silt basin (Type B), temporary rock silt check (Type B), temary rock sediment dam
(T)pe B ,temporary rock silt check (Type A) and temporary silt fence.
Page 11 of 12

X11. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will not generate wastewater.
XI11. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 211.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A
WZS/U3
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12