20031360 Ver 1_Complete File_20031031

o? \NArF9
.off 4G
r
r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Day
DWQ Project No.: 031360 County: Haywood Co?? s - ,3
Applicant: NC Department of Transportation
Project Name: Haywood County Maintenance Yard - Salt Storage Facility
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: 12/10/03
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the
401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650. This form may be returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or
the project engineer. It is not necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, Mark S. Davis, Division 14 Environmental Officer, hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due
care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was
observed to be built within substantial tial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and
02/
Buffer Rules, the pp ve pla d specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date: / ?p?
Agent's Certification
1, _ , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to
be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer
Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
I, , as a duly registered Professional (i.e.,
Engineer, Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized
to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project, for the Permitee hereby state
that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the construction
such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting materials.
Signature Registration No. Date

North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
F WA] - Michael F. Easley, Governor
Ob ? w RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
> Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
C3 vireposswiltmw " Division of Water Quality
December 10, 2003
Haywood County
DWQ Project No. 031360
Haywood County Maintenance Yard -Salt Storage Facility
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Mr. R. G. Watson, P.E.
Division Engineer
N C Department of Transportation
253 Webster Road
Sylva, North Carolina 28779
WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
k)F:( K ?W Z00;i
Dear Mr. Watson:
WATER OUAUTY SECTION
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 235 linear feet
of an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek (100 linear feet of new pipe and 135 linear feet of stream restoration) in
order to construct a Salt Storage Facility at the DOT Maintenance Yard in Haywood County. The NC Division of
Water Quality understands that this project constructed in accordance with your after the fact application dated
October 28, 2003 (received October 31, 2003). Staff of the NC Division of Water Quality reviewed the repair work
on October 9, 2003, and is satisfied with the stream restoration and bank stabilization.
After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification
Nos. 3399 and 3402, corresponding to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit Numbers 27 and 39. In
addition, you must acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including
(but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This
approval will expire with the accompanying 404 Permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ in writing and submit a new application. If the property is
sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for
complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of
total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 211 .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions
listed in the attached certification and anv additional conditions listed below.
1. NCDOT shall monitor this site for a period of one year from the date of issuance of this document to ensure that
bank stabilization and stream restoration procedures are working properly.
2. If NCDWQ determines that the bank stabilization area has become unstable, NCDOT will be required to stabilize
this area. Should repairs be necessary, NCDOT must submit all repair designs to and receive approval from the
Division of Water Quality before the repair work is performed.
3. Riparian vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the
growing season following completion of construction.
4. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of Completion"
form to notify NCDWQ when all work included in the §401 Certification has been completed. The responsible
party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water
Quality upon completion of the project. NCDOT is strongly advised to send in photographs upstream and
downstream of each structure to document correct installation.
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877/623-6748
Mr. R. G. Watson
December 10, 2003
Page Two
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele at 919.733.5715 or Mr. Mike Parker of the
Asheville Regional Office at 828.251.6208.
Sincerely,
1Z 62--v?
ji "Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Mark Davis, Division 14, DEO
Ed Ingle, Roadside Environmental
Steve Lund, USACE Asheville Field Office
Wetlands/401 Unit
Mike Parker, NCDWQ Asheville Regional Office
Tracking and Tardy
Subject: Tracking and Tardy
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:59:30 -0500
From: Mike Parker <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
Cyndi, projects 02-0651 Mod. and 03-1360 were issued today. Mike
Mike Parker - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mike Parker <[e-mail]>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
1 of 1 12/10/03 4:18 PM
a,,. SYAIE °
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 28, 2003
() t3 I 360
Mr. Steven Lund, NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
OCT 3 1 2003
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 WATER QUALITY SECTION
Asheville, NC 28801-2714
Subject: 404/401 After-the-Fact Permit Application (NWP 27 & 39)
Haywood County Maintenance Yard - Salt Storage Facility
Haywood County
State Project No. 14.204411 (DWQ Major Permit Fee $475)
Dear Mr. Lund:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is applying for a Nationwide
After-the-Fact permit for the grading and draining of a new salt storage facility adjacent to the
Haywood County Maintenance Yard. NCDOT had purchased the subject property in June of
1996 (Deedbook 453 Page 1708). Shortly thereafter, approximately 100 linear feet of 10-inch
perforated corrugated metal pipe was placed in a draw to allow for the site to be filled. At that
time, no "live water" was observed on the site. NCDOT used the site as a waste pit from 1996
until the present.
In September 2003, NCDOT began the grading phase of the salt storage facility. In mid
September, Mr. Mark Gibbs, P.E., District Engineer and Mr. Don Carpenter, County
Maintenance Engineer, conducted an onsite investigation to determine if any "live water" was
present on the site. At that time no "live water" was observed. During the final clearing phase of
the project, the track hoe operator cleared soil and debris from the outlet end of the perforated
pipe, which had been installed approximately 6-7 years ago. He also cleaned out 115 linear feet
of a ditch leading to a culvert under the railroad, in addition to 20 linear feet of a spring seep to
the east. At that time, the drainage tile began to discharge water resulting in visible flow in the
excavated ditch.
On October 2, 2003, I was contacted by Mr. Keith Haynes of the Division of Water Quality and
he expressed concerns involving erosion control and the excavation of a small "stream/ditch" at
the site. I conducted an onsite investigation on October 2, 2003, to assess the situation. It
appeared that NCDOT had installed a perforated drain tile and cleaned out a small "stream/ditch"
in order to complete grading of the site and had not implemented proper erosion control
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP

measures.
Haywood Salt Storage Facility Page 2 October 28, 2003
Following the October 2, 2003 site visit, I contacted Mr. Mike Parker of the Division of Water
Quality to discuss the situation and a site visit was scheduled for October 9, 2003. Prior to the
site visit, NCDOT completed the fine grading of the site. The drainage ditch was stabilized,
seeded with native vegetation (no fescue), and the banks were matted with coir fiber matting.
The fill slope was graded on a 3:1 slope, seeded and matted. All stormwater controls were
installed including riprap slope drains and retention basins. We intended to explain the situation
leading up to the incident and obtain a site assessment from Mr. Parker on October 9; however,
the Division of Water Quality issued a Notice of Violation 3 days prior to the site visit and
indicated that an after-the-fact permit would be required.
During the site visit on October 9, 2003, Mr. Parker and Mr. Haynes both indicated they were
pleased with the final site preparation. The only suggestions were to restore riparian vegetation
along the ditch and for NCDOT to apply for an after-the-fact permit. The reforestation plan will
be submitted with the PCN application and will include the following species: Silky Dogwood,
Dog Hobble, Buttonbush, Elderberry, and Virginia Sweetspire.
I am sending photos, a site plan drawing and reforestation plan, as well as a marked county map
and USGS quad map. Natural channel design techniques (pattern, dimension, and profile) were
used to restore the stream/ditch and the stream banks were stabilized with coir fiber matting and
vegetation. No threatened or endangered species are known to be present in or near the project
area; therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated from project construction. If the State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the Office of State Archaeology determines that further
investigations are required, NCDOT will conduct the appropriate site investigations and obtain
compliance from SHPO.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
In order to construct this project, it will be necessary to impact waters of the United States in the
French Broad River Basin. Specifically, NCDOT is requesting authorization for the dredging
activities and placement of one perforated metal pipe in an unnamed headwater tributary to
Richland Creek (DWQ Class C). Listed below is a summary of the proposed impacts.
Site No. Existing Proposed Net Impacts
Station Condition Condition
Site 1 100' x 10" 100'
Perforated CMP
Site 2 135' Stream 135' Stream Restoration
Dredging
235 linear feet total
Permits Requested
NCDOT is requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for the
unauthorized activities. By copy of this letter, I am asking the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Nationwide
Haywood Salt Storage Facility Page 3 October 28, 2003
Permit request. All unauthorized work appears to be compliant with the applicable nationwide
regulations and should have caused minimal adverse impact to the aquatic environment.
Also, by copy of this letter, I am requesting authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR),
Division of Water Quality (DWQ). In addition, I am asking the NCWRC and Mr. Ed Ingle,
(NCDOT) to comment directly to me concerning this permit request.
It is neither NCDOT policy nor their intention to work in jurisdictional areas without proper
authorization and/or concurrence from the various regulatory agencies. If you have any questions
or need additional information, please contact me at [phone]. Your early review and
consideration will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Mark S. Davis
Division Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, DWQ, DENR, Raleigh (seven copies)
Mr. Mike Parker, DWQ, DENR, Asheville
Ms. Marla Chambers, Western Region Highways Project Coordinator, NCWRC
Mr. Richard Phillips, PE, Regional Engineer, LQS, DENR
Mr. R.G. Watson, P.E., Division Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. Mark Gibbs, District Engineer, NCDOT
Mr. E. L. Ingle, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT
Office Use Only: Forni Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.081360
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 27 & 39 A
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: 253 Webster Road
Sylva, NC 28779
Attn: Mark S. Davis Division Environmental Officer
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: markdavisAdot.state.nc.us
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
N/A
Telephone Number: N/A
E-mail Address: N/A
Fax Number: N/A
Page 1 of 8
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Haywood County Maintenance Yard - Salt Storage Facility
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 14.204411
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Haywood Nearest Town: Lake Junaluska
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Take 140 W from Asheville and
take exit 27 onto US 19/23/74 go approximately 3 miles and take exit 104 to Lake Junaluska.
At the intersection with NC209 go right and at first red light Po left onto Paragon Pkwy. Go
approximately 0.5 mile to NCDOT Maintenance Yard on left.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35° 31' 38.15"N / 82° 57' 11.62" W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: State
DOT Maintenance Yard. The draw was filled over the past seven years with waste material.
7. Property size (acres): 2.78 Acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): UT to Richland Creek Class C
9. River Basin: French Broad
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 2 of 8
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The final grading of the site was completed
for the construction of a new salt storage facility.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Work was completed using
typical construction equipment (e.g., bulldozers, trackhoe, dump trucks)
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Commercial and residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 8
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year tloodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http:/hvww.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: N/A
Total area of wetland impact proposed: N/A
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length
of Impact
(linear
feet
Stream Name" Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
(please specify)
Site 1 Culvert-Perforated 100 Unnamed Tributary I foot I/P
Site 2 Restoration 135 Unnamed Tributary 1 foot I/P

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mapguest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 235'
Page 4 of 8
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
This site is the onlv available area for the construction of a salt storage facility in nroximity-to
the NCDOT maintenance yard. It is essential to have an adequate salt storage facility to provide
for deicing of mountain roads and to keep the salt out of the weather to protect the environment.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 5 of 8
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htti3:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The fill slope has been stabilized with erosion control matting and seeded. Appropriate
stormwater controls have been installed. The riparian area has been heavily mulched and
seeded. The riparian vegetation of the disturbed intermittent stream has been restored by
planting a variety of native vegetation suitable for the site conditions The species planted
include: black willow, silky dogwood buttonbush and elderberry. (See attached planting
diagram).
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/M/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Page 6 of 8
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 213 .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular ti•om near bank of channel; Gone 1 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 8
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Anproximatley'/z acre of the 2.78 acre site was gaveled. Appropriate stormwater controls have
been installed in the form of riprap ditches, settling basins, and gassed ditches and buffer areas.
(See attached site diagrams and photos)
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ® No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

Applicant/Agent's Signature ' Dafe
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
SrIE ??•ILSYWOOD ?ola?3-?-YJNTEIJA?cF YAv--"D
STA. ?J/A
llwx
EXISM > 100'4-. x /a^ PERF?ZaTS D OM P
RFD > s? ??
? ?.??ata S?
SKEW
NIA
ICI
I I l To ?/ :: ? scv Pb
?I
II 'y
I I P?
II ?,
JI
?? II a
,???gLOPE
-Av
-Ij
CLASS 4-
r? V
RO C1L
301 - ZPLASTIC PIA5
S 7A,,," J s 4?
s? 4.uD/STu2i3.ED
DITGN
k- C.L ASS 4 (?jCK
11 __
r
FX,STJNG ??'• PERFERAT61? cMP
Y
I• I' LIJ i
??' I I - I I I I I I I
I I I I I , I I -I i I I
{ I I ' I I '_ i?_i
, I I I ? - 1 - -
' i
-- 7-1
- ?.4•_- ' -------! '

?_-`--L•-I -- ??-^-•--
1I
-
I I I

1 I I I I I

I I I I I I

i_ ?

'?-L
' !- 1 - I --
_
I i
-
I I I I I
I i t 1
I I '
-
? :
'
-
L
i f
-
I -'===_
L _
_L- a..
-
-•- -
-
-
--? •
---. --- - •- -
-.-

.? I,
! -i L-T I ??,
v' I_ _1 1 1 I I I I? _ rL I '
I--
T.--- I i I I I I i _
?
`?
I I I
? I I I 1- I I I I ?^-:__- 1 I .y __._-_ '.?_I _
----'-'-•- -i--
I
; I {
! !
l L I 1 I I +
i I ? I
B•?- -- ' 1.-.11 ? _! _
'
1 ' . _' -:.--' --?
---
--- -•S--' ' !?.1
?- .-=-:..---r--- --- ?'T,?p?
. - ??
I i - , _
- __I _
L . -•-- -- - • -• - -• -?

7- -T
? --
? ' J

?
I
I, I I
I I ? L.:
I I I
LL
{
I
1
i
• 1 1 1
- I
I
-
I, I i
I I
i-, I , f I;
I I I
--
,
' I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
??; t I I I-_I_ I ? 1 I I I; I I ?t _ I i I?? r-I!- --
•?
1I
I I I
1
1 ?- I
{ I
I -LLT
L ILJ_

-L
I i -? • U -L i

1 ?-- I I I -

_.
- • I- I I I I I I, I I I ? 1 I
1 1 1 1 1 1 i I
1 I
1 I I I I I I .
i I i I I I I
I I I i i Z-?

-
'
-I I 1 I H - -- "-' -;

L 1-1
?
-. ( , 1 I I I I ?
?

`` i
4 T `? t 44
:-

I?
I'
W? I

E n

v 3 I I ,t,
fV v I I /

1
?t o
O

t:i4n?tp?-fit M L `'"' I• ' '

'
'
1,
I + y ?? ?
,
("}M
W la,t? lJ

j

A ?
'iI1 •

w
w U
J
W

q ? ?
vl
?i r
T

0.
t J
V ? W
?lj
1
,1
1 " 1
?s u

Z o.4 z
V' ti J
R
ECi a0y ?

VT T

h kn ,: v a
GO
\? yl r 1?

Vi ,u -? . It
z 't .7
.?
s
? ? 7 ,a 1
w
1 L
0

.?
1
A l)
?+ c t.
r?
1
,n
?

A f? ?
p O
?
rr

J I `?` I I

1 4 J ,
° '? J?
?
o f f
Y S y?
d 1
?; v
VI ? ? ?
_1zw?
'" W -w-
I

W
J
A_
?? f1 Id
v
1I
V1 ?
.I
J
V
0
O
h
Q

I
a.

o Q
- ? Q

41

a J z
?

z
a w ?,
i a
d

lw
? O
QZ
J ?0
? J
,oE
I
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET
Plants will be planted approximately 3 feet to 5 feet on center, random spacing, averaging
4 feet on center.
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION TYPICAL
1 -. i
150 plants made up of the following, species
Black Willow Salix nigra
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis
EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS AND.
SDescriplLoa

._.II11r2.Q1
245.03
245.05
893.01
890.05
245.01
245.02
892.04
895.10
892.01
892.0
897.01
897.02
894.01
245.04
896.01
896.02
896.03
Temporary Sill Ditch ..:.. . ..................... no
Temporary Diversion
Temporary Slit Fence
?---
Temporary%elope Drain with Earth Berm ..........
S!It Basin Type A ,.•,-•
Slit Basin Type 8 ,,.,_,•-.._
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-A ..........
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type-B _..._.
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-A ............ Temporary Rock Sediment Darn Type-B L.
r.
Rock Pipe Inlet Protection i ype-A _.-
Rock Pipe Inlet Protection Type-B ............ Rock Silt Screen
Stilling Basin ..........................................
Rock Inlet Protection:
Type A .......................... _... A Ej --OR --A
Type B ............................... B .. OR -• B JJ
.. -• 1
I
Type C ............................... C OR C
12 March, 1992
• r
DESIGN FOR SILT BASIN
x•,.600 CUBIC FEET PER AUK-
CHECKED EVERY 'STORM EVENT AND CLEANED OUT 11"HEN HALF FULL
1?I
SILT BASIN - 1
(S. B. 7)
3
2T
7-- rJ s c r, E
L,D,-IH OF DISi_?BE-D
SILT B?SIN - 2 I-. OF DISi_?c?D `-
( S.B. 1!:)
-0 C- R'o ON
USE-
SILT BASIN - 3
(S.B. 21)
<s.
I
SILT B;SIN - 4
(S. B. 28)
L----\GTH OF DISIU?3=1 =?-= ---
LENGTH OF DISTURBED A--F= ''

TEMP STONE DITCH CHECK
ROCK SILT CHECK. DM
SILT BASIN - B
TEMP SLOPE DRAIN
TEMP.. SILT DITCH
EARTH EMBAN YUM-ENT
SILT FENCE
FI BERG ?.S S ROVING
RI P R.AP
-T??-
.=-- E GF.

Haywood County Maintenance - Restored Site

Haywood County Maintenance
Drain Tile Outlet
t?
i?
it
a
4
k
I ?
f?
i
0
0
N
i
-1-in f `?• M
l:) i x
ti?^.i I' ? 2r1
I
i
i -
i
?,? ??rl'? 115 L
??15 7;i ? • 11 .t
,
8} I .? 1~
Ctrl
ti -_
CY)
n. CV ` -
.'. O
+i ?~ ( II 1 CAD
Cu
4?

.Wig I
40
A 1%
lip ,!: ?. - 5 f? 1 + + dp }
' t
_ •: . ?1 ?? t? ` gyp-
LO LTU
06 o
cl) (D a) P
r:? _
II U
71
_ 0?
Lr r r
Lo 0
Ad& 0 co
• s n I .. s n +? Z(A2
Q` 0
r' •r- ! i?1 II'? • • U ,'"J` f fi .2.o
a
(0
?', ,- ~? ILL' iC . •'•. O I SI". .?f f I`1 ,s' J , J U N
'cj
• r ? !fir ? ? +M` ' ? •ql
lie,
?] I •
s
00
A *• •j dCC T ?+ ?j d • ?`\ w
44?, Ti
C) cr
IV W 0 (L)
40, (D
In cu

N
N
r
r
F-
LO
o
N
00
O
Z
N
00
M
r
M
o
LO
O
Z C
U) 'C IER
N
92 =0 8
m cn U
cv z
2