20030343 Ver 1_Complete File_20030314

WETLANDS/ 401 GROUP
MAR 14 2003
. WATER QUALITY SECTION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGS, N.C. 27611-5201 LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 47,1710 East Marion Street
Shelby, N. C. 28151-0047
March 10, 2003
Mr. John W. Hendrix - NCDOT Projects 030343
US Army Corp of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, N. C. 28801-5006
Dear Mr. Hendrix:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, proposes the following
project for your issuance of a Section 404 Permit. We believe this project can be accomplished
under Nationwide #3 Permit, Maintenance and Nationwide 933 Permit, Temporary Construction,
Access, and Dewatering.
COUNTY: Catawba
LOCATION: Bridge #229, SR 1809, east of Claremont
STREAM: Unnamed tributary to Hagan's Fork Creek, Class WS-IV Waters (From
Catawba County SR 1806 to McLin Creek)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of replacing a 26' long x 18' wide deteriorating
timber bridge with a 40' long x 30' wide concrete bridge on same location. Class 1 riprap will be
placed around the bridge abutments along the stream bank under the bridge for scour protection
and structure stabilization. The existing bridge bulkhead and west roadway embankment will be
removed to create a natural bank. It is proposed that the old bridge strip footing, located on the
east side adjacent to the existing floodplain bench under the bridge, will be left in place to prevent
channel widening. Temporary impervious cofferdams will be necessary to install the concrete
abutments for the proposed bridge. Upon project completion, the area impacted by the temporary
cofferdams will be restored to pre-construction conditions. Enclosed is a PCN application, a sketch
of planned activities, and location maps relative to the proposed project.
' _ r
Mr. John W. Hendrix
Bridge # 229, SR 1809, Catawba
March 10, 2003 - Page 2
Based upon the "Guidelines for the Location and Design of Hazardous Spill Basins", referenced in
DOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, the applicable locations
for the placement of hazardous spill basins are at stream crossings on highways functionally
classified as rural or urban arterials and where the stream crossing is within 'h mile of the critical
area. The proposed project is located in a WS-IV watershed; however, it is not located 1/2 mile
from the critical watershed area, nor is the road classified a rural or urban arterial. Hazardous spill
basins are not required. Enclosed is the NCDOT hazardous spill basin checklist for this project.
A review of the Natural Heritage information for the threatened species listed for Catawba County,
the dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora), revealed several known populations 1-2 miles
east of the project site. I have conducted a survey for the heartleaf species in the project area on
March 5, 2003. None were observed. It was determined that this species was not in the proposed
project area. No significant effect on this species is anticipated. A review of the available
information from the National Register of Historic Places was also conducted. It is anticipated that
no historic sites will be affected by the proposed project.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any
questions, please call me at 704-480-9020.
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
BY:
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: Mr_ Michael L. Holder, F.E., Division Engineer
Mr. Dan Holderman, P.E. , Division Bridge Engineer
Mr. Neil Trivette, Roadside Environmental Field Engineer
Mr. Ron Linville, WRC
Mir. Brian Cole, USF & WS
Mr. John Dorney, DENF DWQ,401/Wetlands Unit (Courtesy copy)
File
Office Use Only: 0 3 0 3 4 3Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW Permit #3. #33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
H. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder NCDOT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelbv NC 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020
E-mail Address:
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: NCDOT
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelbv NC 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon o,dot state nc us
Fax Number: 704-480-5401
Page 1 of 7
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge #229 Replacement on SR 1809, Catawba Count
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NCDOT Right of way
4. Location
County: Catawba Nearest Town: Claremont
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): Hwy 10 east from Newton right
on SR 1801, left on SR 1807 straight on SR 1809 to bridge site
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 35°39'50N/81°07'50 W
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Bridge on paved secondary road
7. Property size (acres): <0.10 acres NCDOT right of way
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed tributary to Hagan Fork
Creek From Catawba County SR 1806 to McLin Creek) Class WS-IV waters
9. River Basin: Catawba
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
'o`4r %n.? ??•}.sta?e.,??-u/c ,;=? t u??s'.)
River Basin map is available at
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: The project consists of =lacing?a 26' long?x 18'
wide timber bridge with a 40' long x 30' wide concrete bridge. It is proposed that the existna
bridge bulkhead will be removed and the west roadway embankment will be sloped to create
a natural bank It is also proposed that the old bridge strip footing; located adjacent to the
Page 2 of 7
floodplain bench under the bridge on the east side (which is can seen in the enclosed photos),
will be left in place to prevent widening of the channel Temporary cofferdams will be
needed to install the concrete abutments.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: A trackhoe and crane
will be used during construction.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Mostly residential wards.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
None anticipated.
VL Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1 Wetland Imnacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100 year Floodplain**
yes/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplain are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(KW, or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at httu:li« • ,; . fcmu. Ro . .
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
Page 3 of 7
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream
Impact
S
?
°f
h Average Width Perennial or
N
omber Type of Impact* (gh
mp Stream Name** of Stream Intermittent?
(indicate Before Impact (please specify)
on map)
Temporary cofferdams Unnamed
tributary to
8 feet
1 for bridge abutment 40 feet
Hagan Fork
(downstream) Perennial
installation on bedrock Creek
Riprap on banks for
1 structure stabilization 60 feet "
and scour protection
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, eta. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-500-358-9616, or online at
«1Aii-.us!zs.eov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., yov% .tonozone.corr,
w\v\A•.mapauest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: Temporary cofferdam
impacts = 40 feet. RiPrap on streambanks scour protection and structure stabilization = 60
feet.
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U. S. NO OPEN WATER IMPACTS
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake' pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

• List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited, to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation NO POND CREATION
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
Page 4 of 7
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
NCDO flans to reIlace a deteriorating bridge with another bridge: therefore, avoiding
permanent impacts to the stream. The bridge length is being increased 20 feet to avoid the
relocation of the streams on the upstream side. The bridge width is being increased 12 more feet
to accommodate two lanes of traffic.
The existing bridge bulkhead and roadway embankment is to be removed to create a natural bank
section An old bridge strip footing will be left in place on the face of the existing floodplam
bench to maintain channel dimensions under the bridge. The used of riprap will be limited to the
bank of the stream around the bridge abutments to prevent scour. The existing bridge will be
removed following the best management practices for bridge removal.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httn://h'o.enr,state.nc.us/ncuretiands/strmQide.htmi .
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
IMPACTS < 150 FEET, MITIGATION NOT ANTICIPATED
Page 5 of 7
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httv:/A12o.enr.state.nc.us/ivrp/indcx.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes', provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 6 of 7
Zone* Impact ? eet Multiplier Required
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
NA
XL Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
No additional impervious surface is proposed on this project.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NA
XIIL Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fat permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicanes control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 7 of 7
. a,
r
X ± ?? b f n?'7'F? yX
A a
2nd unnamed tributary
to Hagan Fork
Downstream of Bridge #229
Under Bridge #229 from
Downstream side
?e
_1z

Q
Tributaries joining on upstream side of bridge
? S
Bridge #229 frorr_ , northeast
Bridge #229 ?????_ southwest
?/f7L, 0 ? u?1,Vlt? tL:? TI-L4 Pz. c.nh z
' 1 T-D th4'?7KA1 r-o%L
i
yf?o /o-fbo ,
/ /v?sQ ? 52 i 8 0 ?
r--
Cu,5T7..J?? 2l?Lo,?h ? 1?????6
77-7
V-,
i
-PLA-AJ
GL.9S.o
rL n ? r. ? ?;-rT-,
12 cwr

l=ater, J?, 7v ??r??! ?? 7Dc,L
ez? ??
I Z-0
P20Z 5.7--j,5-ZOZ '7
?Jcb6
?I?, IZ-??????E r?r?-?ur??uc?;
C.?-rAw? p Gvu?`7
s? I v 0g
Xa?

? I
_ 7
C314
--7
176
I r^\ 1 ?` I / ° I 0, 74
- - - - - - - - - ---
72
175
l 173 i z- a.,M I :y
49 c. _ roJ. i.m.
171 r
93
`-
CONOVER i • f I xn /' .. r\\
POP. 6,113 ,' I I I I I II " ??J3 -I I
? I- //1 I I I J \
_ ----- \ \
92
f ? / I 3
a?j
G r„
?I R287 86
{ / ?J?• - -
111 ?u ? /
l ` „AN,288 - - == R - 89 -
_ C109 90
P87 85 ze
P121 -
.01 1 ' _ ? ,.TIJ 11'16 '? \\
,\ I - _ Tae 2se9 /.
? 229
J f; ^ 122 -
/ \ rn
512 /8oS
r2GP//r ? r or se, au i
.TI
,
iF: jfff!
l yy ? SSS f P
F d s _ .
All,
Ile
x:r '' ? ` f ?# a?' f ? t ?,.. 'w ? .,?...x-.r' i ,,..? ? ?'' "'? :•?
rt,
4i I
y .F F ;f ,r ?c -yam 41: ZYS.e'c-.5?
i ; ?. l ? F Trn4 s? x
yF[ a
- `> ? rya ? ? ?? ' ?, ..?"•
c
Name: NEWTON 1 C Location: 035° 39'47.4- N 081° 07'50-8" W
Date: 3/312003 Caption: Bridge #229 Replacement, SR 1809, UT to Hagan Fork Creek,
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet WS-IV Watershed
Cowricht (C) 1997, Maptech. Inc.
OLINA SHEET NUMBER 25
(Joins sheet 7 8)
\e
v HsC2 •? NwC HsD ?/ - _ ??y , t Cuv
- 3 HSC2 = s? :' n0. O p
CmC2 CmD2 CnC2
y? w HwC2 ? HsB2 ? sC2 ? a :t ; C"mC2 `' }.
I t HsC2 //? Hw62
- -Cm • /% CnC2 En6 .
>" \ ??b '` +• HwC2 HSC2 CnC2
C a / p O? C D
;mD? 5 qt., .,• . ci .
CmC2 1,- ` CmC2 y Cm62 CC -
HsB2
CmD2 f
CmC f _ ?. •// CmC2 .j CmC2 34• ??
CMB2 4 r Cn62 AsC2 C?C2 + CnE3 "? Hs82
• . AsC2 L ?? °< • ' PeE _ HSC2 HwC2 ?I
t'. . N \ Cw wC2 ??
• A5C2 Cm62 AsC2 WkE HwC2 CpE • ?
r 2.
a x CmB2 Cmy. _ '4 2i } ?V ~ s'f Cto
CmC2 AsC2 fr... ??
B;i ' CmC2 r ,,•..eMe mg g
.' :1i. - -_' wf ?? ". MPe?• ?' -q,?. tt a fi° v?• bS3_ ;MRg62 ' ..
CmC2 Cm62
Cm62 tea.. m.1 N z
CnC2
.y ? ? '' ? '? E?eE? .A?' - :. •• n3? 111 ? ? .??'
I
? s • Cm62 ? CmC2 ,a {?`'. -•7p CmC2v, ? „ MBC2'
Cm62
s.. CmC2 _` ? ?_ _ ? G? Z \ C? w Mef C2
\ -? s6?`?AsB??d?'. ? Cm? ? AsBs?? ,'- :"'?'?' ?3>-•.,?? _ ,_ 2?•i z ..
CmC2 AsB
nB2 CmB2 w Cw '+ . ??O p
n
Sa
?.:y •- "CmD2 CmC2
CmC2 CmB2` lI Cm8 v
• Witherspo \.': 777 COQ FGA a , CmC2r Cm62 ^'
ossroads G
CmC2 '•,?. ..
•?- '^ ? ' s CmC2 AsB
1 C?ez c AsC2 c •? CmC2 As6:•'?..
•
A56 - %( V ? - +•"- - "' X3"3- ? 'do-,
• y
Ash LL
Cm62 a? .- ?j?? - `=,;. •°. CmC2
CnC2 .?i • ,e ?,:._
AsE2 ,
ma y.: peE CmC2 Cw CmD2 "' •. PeE\` Cm62 III i
ice",.. _ ' •,:.
CmB CmD2 Cw CmB2 CnE3 C"m1?2. CnrC
AsC2 .?` CmB2 C2
f zr CmB2
ay PeE MHE2 t,!, E3 CmC2 : MBC?
CmD2 CmC2
t ' - AsC2=/ CmC2
CmC2 -'4AsE2 ' CmD2? h / r x =
4,4
:m62 '?vc LL »a. \ ? C+`, r m w Ash
y Ash. w CmD2
e.
HsC2 _ ?- { ` _ CmC2 a PsGL
a CmC2 ,
$ c CmB2 CmC2) I
w??I
CmD2 • CmC2
f _ CmD2 74 9
sB w . "CmC2 AsB
J CmC2 Cm62 NIHE2 Cm62_/??_
HSC2 •PaF CmC2 CmD?? O `
Cm62 ?
`AsE2: • /\
? mC mD2 mC2` o
m Cy r E Qe CmC? 0??
CmD2 CmC2 £
e Cw CmC2 •CmB2 Y/ g Cm62 q.??. .«
C? sr Y AsC2 vF Qe . E N N _ -
NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 1Z County: Project ID: 5. 795zb o 7
River Basin: Bridge No: z
Route: ulZ /609 Stream: ?Zi?ur?M`7 -7v 1-1?C Fo,24
Water Quality Criteria:
V"j 5 =V_' Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS rv' r
ORW F, F`
WSI I- r°'
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within 0.5mi of W. S. Critical Area r rt!
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Arterial Urban r r?
Arterial Rural r r?
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required?
r r,/
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).