Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20020939 Ver 1_Complete File_20020611
G ... ..t. William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality November 18, 2003 Chowan County DWQ Project No. 020939 APPROVAL OF 401Water Quality Certification Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Manager Planning and Environmental Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548 Dear Dr. Thorpe: This modification authorizes additional impacts to 0.075 acres wetlands. This modification is applicable only to the additional proposed activities. All the authorized activities and conditions of certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated July 2, 2002 and all other corresponding modifications still apply except where superceded by this certification. The project's purpose is the replacement of Bridge Number 4 on SR 1207 in Chowan County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated August 11, 2003. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3371. This certification corresponds to the Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply. Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification. 1. Stormwater shall be directed to sheetflow at nonerosive velocities through the protected stream buffers. 2. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. 4N N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (919) 733-1786 Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary d Natural Re t t f E i t N h C li D men o an sources epar nv ronmen ort aro na 7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director 3. Compensatory mitigation for impacts to wetlands shall be done for 0.075 acres of impacts in the Cape Fear Basin and 0.04 acres of impacts in the Neuse River Basin. Applying a replacement ration of 2:1 total mitigation for 0.15 acres of riverine wetlands in the Chowan River Basin. Wetland mitigation shall be provided as described below. Type of Replacement Acres of Mitigation Mitigation Site Acres of WL Mitigation Ratio Credited Debited from Site TIP Project R- 3850 (Onsite 0.02 Restoration 1:1 0.02 Mitigation) Total 0.02 If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694. Sincerely, Attachments: mek, P.E. cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office DWQ Washington Regional Office Doug Huggett, DCM Central Files c:\ncdot\T1P B-3435\wqc\020939wgcmod.doc N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (919) 733-1786 Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748 C7 L C, Y 3 R 'il-la.v, ILA. NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Nat,. sour 2p0 Division of Coastal Management ?/?]'?3 Michael F. Easley, Governor Donna D. Moffitt, Director Willi(a ry } MEMORANDUM lip SEP ;1 0 2003 TO: John Hennessy, DWQ 0 + t????? CC: Bill Arrington, DCM Lindsey Riddick, DOT FROM: Cathy Brittingham, Transportation Project Coordinator DATE: September 29, 2003 SUBJECT: Request for Minor Modification of CAMA Permit No. 105-02, TIP No. B- 3435, Replacement of Bridge Bo. 4 on SR 1207 over Rocky Dock Creek, Chowan County. APPLICANT: N.C. Department of Transportation Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed permit modification and return this form to the N.C. Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh Office, by October 20, 2003. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Cathy Brittingham at (919) 733-2293 x238 or Bill Arrington at (252) 808-2808. When appropriate, in- depth comments with supporting data are requested. REPLY _ This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. This agency has no comment on the proposed project. This agency approves of the project, only if the recommended changes are incorporated. See attached. This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached memo. Signed Date 1638 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638 Phone: 919-733-2293 \ FAX: 919-733-1495 \ Internet: http://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY . August 11, 2003 Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDOT Project Manager law 11 North Carolina Department of Environment ?7r n and Natural Resources SEP ' Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District Office Hestron Plaza. H 151-B Highway 24 Morehead City, NC 28557 jW.pf?M6@YBfta Dear Mr. Arrington: SUBJECT: Modification to Major Development Permit 105-02, Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 23 (Action Id No. 200210803) and North Carolina Division of Water Quality Certification 3107 (DWQ Project No. 020939) for the Replacement of Bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek, Chowan County; Federal Aid No. BRZ-1207(1); State Project No. 8.2030201; TIP No.;B-3435; $100.00 Debit work order 8.2030201, WBS Element 33057.1.3 . As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation is currently in the process of replacing bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County, North Carolina. The new bridge will replace an obsolete bridge carrying SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek and to resolve a long standing maintenance problem along SR 1207 in the vicinity of the bridge. During the current removal of the existing causeway, it has been determined that the clearing contractor has inadvertently cleared approximately 2867.0 square feet (0.060 acre) of forested wetlands that were not shown in the original permit application. The cleared areas were not grubbed and will be allowed to naturally regenerate. No mitigation is proposed- for this area. Additionally, it has been determined that an additional 678.2 square feet (0.015 acre) of additional fill in wetlands is necessary to ensure a stable and safe fill slope near each bridge end bent. The NCDOT proposes to use 0.015 acres of on-site restoration as mitigation for the additional fill. It is important to note that the NCDOT has proposed to use 0.20 acres of mitigation from this project MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 on another TIP Project, R-3850, the proposed interchange at Okisko Road in Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties. The impacts on R-3850 actually total 0.19 acres and at a 2:1 ratio would require 0.38 acres of mitigation. This would leave 0.02 acres of mitigation available to offset the impacts at B-3435. Therefore, the NCDOT proposes to use these 0.02 acres to cover the, 0.015 acres of additional fill at B-3435. This will completely utilize all on-site mitigation available at B-3435. The NCDOT hereby requests that a minor modification be issued to Major Development Permit No 105-02 to allow the additional 0.015 acre of fill and associated mitigation as described above. In compliance with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the NCAC we will provide $475.00 to act as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application previously noted in this application (see Subject line). By copy of this letter the NCDOT also requests the North Carolina Division of Water Quality modify Water Quality Certification 3361 (DWQ Project No. 020939) and that the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers modify the Department of the Army Nationwide Permit (Action ID 200210803). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Lindsey Riddick of my staff at (919) 715-1459 Sincerely, G? regory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. ?I/ I E'nvironmeManagement Director roject Development and Environmental Analysis Branch CC: w/attachment Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design Mr. Bill Biddlecome, USACE, Washington w/o attachment Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design Mr. Omar Sultan, Programming and TIP Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Mr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental Mr. Don Conner, P.E., Division Engineer Mr. Clay Willis, DEO Mr. Jay McInnis, P. E., Project Planning Engineer - ? i u uu u 7v J I? O IA? i o 46 it I I , 0 1 t? 3 O t I I^\ ? , cc l 71 V ITS i ! I s I :1F / ' t vrni rt 1 ? ? `-g .tom l o I ? ? r yl ?/ ! r ff I ?bIN? ?o O 1,/ V? U U U U 0 i _ T C I L b C ?i . r u u ((?? j? U VV? •- O E\,a vz, -rv IS ?, IF I? 'h i ,?U1UU IV !I ?S _I i .% i r i 1 I r~ ? I j I j 6 1 ?< t j i ? U F cd G U VD OO pA® P? V /2. LL Y may' WUY z' ?j ?, O 411, E? 0 r C Q. C C. 1- l CALCULATIONS PROJECT # 8.2030203 Additional Clearing Area 1158.0657 SF 646.5213 SF 96.5817 SF 965.5804 SF Total 2866.7491 SF Additional Fill Area 39.8576 SF 310.149 SF 328.2431 SF Total 678.2497 SF WAT Michael F. Easley, Governor ER Cl? O? QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ` 0 7 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality fl ? July 2, 2002 Chowan County DWQ Project No. 020939 APPROVAL OF 401Water Quality Certification Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager Planning and Environmental Branch North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Gilmore: You have our approval, as described in your application dated April 18, 2002, and in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 0.17 acres or jurisdictional wetlands. In addition, your are authorized to perform mechanized clearing in 0.04 acres of jurisdictional wetlands. The project's purpose is the replacement of Bridge Number 4 on SR 1207 in Chowan County. The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated April 18, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3371. This certification corresponds to the Regional Permit Number 198000291 issued by the Corps of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit unless otherwise specified in the Water Quality Certification. This approval is valid solely for, the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below). Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby, responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the conditions listed in the attached certification. 1. Stormwater shall be directed to sheetflow at nonerosive velocities through the protected stream buffers. 2. Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality upon completion of the project. If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (919) 733-1786 Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748 4F INATF?, `off PG ? r fl ? This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694. Sincerely, Attachments: cc:. Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office DWQ Washington Regional Office Doug Huggett, DCM Central Files c.\ncdot\T1P B-343Rwgc\020939wgc.doc Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Alan W. Klimek, P.E. N. C. Division of Water Cluality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (919) 733-1786 Customer Service: 1 800 623-7748 . L d .. SrA1F4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT GOVERNOR SECRETARY June 27, 2002 a Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDOT Project Manager North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources A N Division of Coastal Management o Morehead City District Office Hestron Plaza IIC-?7 151-B Highway 24i Morehead City, NC 28557 f-? Dear Mr. Arrington: SUBJECT: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek Chowan County; Federal Aid No. BRZ-1207(1); State Project No. 8.2030201; TIP No. B-3435. 0 9_'? 0 ! 9 As detailed in the original request for a CAMA Major Development Permit dated April 18, 2002, the NCDOT proposes to replace bridge No. 4 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County. As part of the permit application, the NCODT proposed to remove and restore approximately 639.0 feet of existing causeway. The North Carolina Division of Coastal Management requested an on-site mitigation plan be provided prior to issuance of the Major Development Permit. Please find attached the requested on-site mitigation plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mr. Lindsey Riddick of my staff at (919) 733-7844, extension 304. Sincerely, . Mr. V. arles Bruton, Ph.D., Manager PDEA - Office of the Natural Environment MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 FAX: 919-733-9794 WESSITE. WWW.NCDOT.ORG LOCATION: TRANSPORTATION BUILDING 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET RALEIGH NC ti 3 CC: w/attachment Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington Mr. Mike Bell, USACE, Washington Mr. Doug Huggett, NCDCM, Raleigh vl rr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality Mr. Jeff Wait, Roadside Environmental w/o attachment Mr. John Alford, P. E., Roadway Design Mr. David Rhodes, P. E., Programming and TIP Ms. Debbie Barbour, P. E., Highway Design Mr. David Chang, P. E., Hydraulics Mr. D. R. Conner, P. E., Division One Engineer Mr. Jay McInnis, Project Planning Engineer Mr. Greg Perfetti, P. E., Structure Design ,k:: - a On-site Mitigation Plan for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County, North Carolina. TIP No. B-3435 June 27, 2002 Overview: The NCDOT will replace the existing 160.0-foot long bridge over Rocky Hock Creek with a new bridge approximately 799.0 feet in length. The additional bridge length will allow for the removal of 639.0 linear feet of causeway in previously filled wetlands. The existing causeway will be removed and returned to an elevation resembling that of the adjacent wetlands. Causeway Removal: The removal of the old causeway will mean that approximately 0.6 acres of fill will be removed from wetlands associated with Rocky Hock Creek and the Chowan River. Approximately 639.0 feet of existing causeway will be lifted, restoring the riverine wetland underneath. It is anticipated that after the causeway is removed, the same wind tides that presented a flooding problem for SR 1207 will now represent a return to the natural hydrologic cycle for the surrounding wetlands. The water will be able to flow unimpeded beneath the new structure, allowing the natural wetland hydrology to return. Therefore, in addition to the 0.60 acres of restoration, the NCDOT proposes riverine wetland enhancement extending outward from the lifted causeway. The area of enhancement will be calculated f as a % circle, the radius of which is the length of the causeway removed. The total enhancement area will equal 7.36 acres. Over the years, there has been a significant amount of compaction and settlement of the existing causeway. As a result of this settlement and the constant maintenance needed for continued operation of SR 1207, the NCDOT anticipates there may be some areas where the current depth of fill material within the causeway, including asphalt, may be 8.0 feet deep or greater below the natural wetland elevation. The NCDOT intends to ensure the removal of this material to prevent potential contamination of the adjacent Chowan River and Rocky Hock Creek. Due to the amount of fill material to be removed, there is the potential for a void to be left in place of the removed causeway. As has been the case in the past with similar projects, the NCDOT proposes to fill these voids with clean, unconsolidated sand. The voids will be filled to within 6.0 to 12.0 inches of the elevation of the surrounding wetlands. The reason for a range of 6.0 to 12.0 inches is twofold. The filling of the anticipated void with clean sand was recommended by the USACE and is intended to provide a base substrate while allowing the natural hydrologic processes to move organic material and sediment into the top 6.0 to 12.0 inches, thereby providing a natural organic surface over time. By leaving the area that has been filled with loose sand slightly lower than the adjacent wetlands, it is anticipated that organic materials carried by the wind tides and/or brought in and out by the flushing of the adjacent wetlands will settle into the void. This will create the desired upper layer of natural material. It will also create small areas of micro-habitat for fish, amphibians, and small mammals. The second reason for not attempting to match the exact elevation of the adjacent wetlands is that it is difficult to hit target elevations without mechanized grading activity. Allowing there to be a range of 6.0 to 12.0 inches avoids the possibility of unwanted consolidation of the material. Vegetation: The NCDOT does not propose any vegetation planting or monitoring. The area to be restored is underneath the new bridge and would be virtually impossible to plant and equally difficult to monitor. The NCDOT fully expects natural colonization of native flora to occur around and under the removed causeway. The proposed enhancement area is currently a standing Cypress-Gum Swamp community. The canopy of this area is dominated by bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) and swamp tupelo (Nyssa aquatica). The NCDOT does not propose any vegetative manipulation in this area as it is expected that the greatest benefit to the system will be realized through the return of the natural hydrologic processes. Hydrology: The proximity of the, enhancement and restoration areas to the Chowan River and Rocky Hock Creek ensure that both areas will be saturated and/or inundated for extended periods of time. However, as requested by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management, the NCDOT will install a single surface water monitoring gauge and a corresponding rainfall gauge within the proposed enhancement area. The NCDOT will maintain and monitor the gauges for one year. While it is difficult to quantify success criteria for the proposed enhancement, the NCDOT will consider both the restoration and enhancement areas a success if the areas exhibit periodic fluctuations of the water level that do not correspond to local rain events or that correspond disproportionately to local rain events. The intent here is to be able to identify fluctuations that can be attributed to wind tides versus those that may be due to precipitation. MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Roger ?Thorpe Date: SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Name NCDOT - Bridge 4 on SR 1207 B-3435 County CHOWAN Project Number 02 0939 County2 Recvd From DCM Region Washington Received Date 6/11/02 Recvd By Region Project Type replace bridge Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.) Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. 'iCAMA ? PY O N ?- 25-22 F B - NSW 3©.104. F ?- F- O Y ON F_- F- r-F- F__ F_r ? l_ Mitigation Wetland MitigationType Type Acres Feet Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N. Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss) Comments: Issue n/c cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 1 Art-, NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Michael F. Easley, Govemor Donna D. Moffitt, Director William r- Ross Jr S Mr. John R. Dorney Environmental Biological Supervisor Division of Water Quality 020939 June 7, 2002 MEMORANDUM: TO: FROM: SUBJECT Applicant: Project Location: Doug Huggett Major Permits Processing Coordinator CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review NC Department of Transportation Z;W Ctdry t= URITY QKn P ? -..Y. ?? _Pt Chowan County at the crossing of Rocky Hock Creek on SR 1207. Proposed Project: NCDOT proposes to replace the existing 160' long timber bridge over Rocky Hock Creek with an 850' long concrete bridge spanning Rocky Hock Creek and the adjacent Cypress-gum Swamp. 639' of causeway will be excavated from the existing roadbed and restored to its previous wetland hydrology. Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by June 29, 2002. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Bill Arrington at (252) 808-2808. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed. This agency has no comment on the proposed project. This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are incorporated. See attached. This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments. SIGNED DATE 151-6 hwy. 24, Heston Plaza II, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 Phone: 252-808-28081 FAX: 252-247-33301 Internet hfp://dcm2.enr.state.nc.us An Equal Oopcrtunii l Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Rewc;ed 10% Post Consumer Paper Development Type FEE DCM % DWQ % (14300 1601435100093 1625 6253) (24300 1602 435100095 2341) 1. Private, non-commercial development that does not involve 5250 100%(S250) 0% (SO) the filling or excavation of any wetlands or open water areas: H. Public or commercial development • that does not involve the filling or $400 100%(S400) 0%(SO) excavation of any wetlands or open water areas: III. For development that involves the filling and/or excavation of up to 1 acre of wetlands and/or open water areas, determine if A, B, C, or D below applies: III(A). For Private, non-commercial development, If General water Quality S250 100%(S250) 0%(SO) Certification No.3301 (see attached) can be applied: III(S): For public or commercial development, if General water Quality $400 100%(S400) 0%(SO) Certification No.3301 (see attached) can be applied: III(C). If, General Water Quality Certification No. 3301 (see attached) could be applied, but DCM staff determined that additional review and 5400 60%($240) 40% (5160) written DWQ concurrence is needed because of concerns related to wdter quality or aquatic life: III(D). If General Water Quality Certification No. 3301 (see attached) S400 60% (5240) 40%(S160) l can not be applied: l , i IV. For development that involves the filling and/or excavation of more 5475 60%(S285) 40%($190) than one acre of wetlands and/or open water areas: , DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation 2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge No. 4, on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County Photo Index -.2000:149-1849 grid K-3, L-3 1995: 149-1563 grid M-3 State Plane Coordinates: x 2683325 y: 867225 GPS: Rover File # 3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F 4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 2/28/2002 Was Agent Present - YES (Lindsey Riddick) 5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received as Complete- 5/30/2002 Office - Morehead City 6. SITE DESCRIPTION: (A) Local Land Use Plan - Chowan County Land Classification from LUP - Rural and Conservation (B) AEC(s) Involved: PTA and CS (C) Water Dependent: Yes (D) Intended Use: Public (E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A Planned - N/A (F) Type of Structures: Existing - Secondary paved road and bridge Planned - Secondary paved road and bridge (G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A Source: N/A 7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA] (A) 404 Type Wetlands aaa.u 7,405 sq. ft. v ?aaa.a Clear 1742 sq. ft. (Method III) (B) Public Trust Area - Shallow xisddgng Q hc?dltlon'a10 sq. ft. Bottom Shading 1260 sq. ft. (C) Other - High Ground 29,250 sq. ft. 19,500 sq. ft. (causeway removal) (in roadway) (D) Total CAMA AEC Disturbed: 3960 sq. ft., 0.09 acres (E) Total area disturbed by project: 1.42 acres (F) Primary Nursery Area: No (G) Water Classification: B-NSW (H) Open for Shellfishing: No 8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The N.C. Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the existing 160-foot long timber bridge over Rocky Hock Creek with an 850-foot long concrete bridge spanning Rocky Hock Creek and the adjacent Cypress-gum Swamp. 639 feet of causeway will be excavated from the existing roadbed and restored to its previous wetland hydrology. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT 0 2 0 9 3 9 NC DOT - B-3435 Chowan County, Bridge No. 4 PAGE 2 9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The site of this proposal is Bridge No. 4 on State Road 1207, 4.5 miles northwest of Edenton at the crossing of Rocky Hock Creek, in Chowan County. The general purpose of the project is to replace the deteriorated 160-foot long by 19-foot wide timber and concrete bridge with an 850- foot long by 28-foot wide concrete bridge Spanning Rocky Hock Creek and the adjacent Cypress- gum Swamp, to alleviate flooding of the northern bridge approach and allow safer driving conditions for the traveling public. Bridge No. 4 crosses Rocky Hock Creek near its confluence with the Chowan River. The bridge crossing Rocky Hock Creek is flanked with Cypress-gum Swamp, except for the southwest quadrant, which is urbanized and currently supports a marina. Creek width at the crossing is approximately 120 feet and widens significantly downstream (southwest) of the bridge. Vertical clearance between the water and bridge bottom is approximately 3 feet. An approximately 1000- foot long by 45-foot wide causeway was constructed through the Cypress-gum Swamp on Dorovan Muck soils when the bridge was constructed in 1950.The causeway settlement and flooding have led to constant maintenance of the road. The Cypress-gum Swamp area consists of Bald Cypress, Sweetgum, Willow, Red Maple, Swamp Tupelo Gum, Sweet Bay, Giant Cane, Greenbrier and Poison Ivy. Soils on this site are mainly Dorovan Muck with a small portion of Udorthents in the upper elevations as classified by the NC Soil Conservation Service. Approximate elevations on the site range between 1 feet and 5 feet above normal water level. Freshwater Muscles were noted at Bridge No. 4. No evidence of SAV beds was noted. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality classifies waters of Rocky Hock Creek as B-NSW at the project site. No Primary Nursery Area, as designated by the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries, is located at this site. The Chowan County Land Use Plan designates the project area as Rural, with all CAMA Areas of Environmental Concern designated as Conservation. The proposal is to replace the existing 160-foot long by 19-foot wide timber and concrete bridge with an 850-foot long by 28-foot wide pre-stressed concrete bridge on the existing alignment. The proposed bridge will have a vertical clearance 1 foot greater than the existing bridge (approximately 4 feet). Constructing this project would include removing 639 feet of the previously filled causeway (that is approximately 45 feet wide) and grading it 6-12 inches lower than the surrounding Cypress-gum wetlands to facilitate the precipitation of organic sediment into the restored wetland area. The northern portion of the bridge will be approximately 5 feet higher than the existing fill causeway to prevent future flooding. The bridge is being widened from 19 feet to 28 feet to more closely correspond to the 11 foot paved travel lanes and 4 foot grassed shoulders of SR 1207. NC DOT Best Management Practices will be used for erosion control and bridge demolition. FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT NC DOT - B-3435, Chowan County, Bridge No. 4 PAGE 3 10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: As proposed, the construction of the bridge approaches with 3:1 slopes would require the filling of approximately 7,405 square feet (0.17 acres) of 404 type wetlands and approximately 19,500 square feet (0.45 acres) of impacts to high ground. To allow room for grading, approximately 1742 square feet (0.04 acres) of 404 type wetlands will be cleared adjacent to the road shoulders by NC DOT Method III (mechanical clearing and grubbing). The additional width of the bridge will cause approximately 1260 square feet of additional shading impacts to Public Trust Waters AEC. Removal of 639 feet of previously filled causeway will result in the disturbance of approximately 29,250 square feet (0.67 acres) of high ground. A minimal disturbance of the creek bottom is expected during the installation of the pilings. Approximately 3,960 square feet of the above describe ground disturbance will be within the CAMA Coastal Shoreline AEC. The 30 foot buffer requirement implemented by the Coastal Resources Commission does not apply to this proposal, as bridges and culvert crossings were determined to be water dependent uses. NC DOT has reduced the 404 type wetland excavation and fill impacts associated with this proposal by lengthening the bride from 160 to 850 feet. This will reduce fill in wetlands that would have occurred in raising the causeway. Lengthening the bridge also creates a wetland buffer between the bridge approaches and the waters of Rocky Hock Creek, allowing some treatment of the storm water run off associated with the bridge and roadway. NC DOT has committed to dropping no materials from the bridge demolition in the water and to using top down construction to minimize impacts. Due to the presence of anadromous fish in Rocky Hock Creek, NC DOT has committed to an in-stream work moratorium from February 15 to October 31. The NC DOT has proposed to use standard BMP's to minimize the impacts of erosion. The proposed removal of 639 feet of existing causeway should restore approximately 0.6 acres of fill causeway to its natural hydrology. NC DOT is asking for riverine restoration mitigation credit for this area as well as enhancement mitigation credit for an area extending outward from the removed causeway, calculated as a quarter circle, the radius of which is the length of the removed causeway (7.36 acres). NC DOT has agreed to perform hydrologic monitoring in this area (see included mitigation plan). NC DOT will be impacting approximately 0.21 acres of 404 type wetlands in this proposal and would like to use the restoration created to offset these impacts, leaving a net gain of 0.39 acres of riverine restoration mitigation credit and 7.36 acres of riverine enhancement mitigation credit. NC DOT requests this credit be allowed for future projects within the Chowan River Basin, including TIP project B-3636 on SR 1222, approximately 2.5 miles upstream of Bridge No. 4. The collective disturbance area for the project is 1.42 acres. Bill Arrington June 3, 2002 Morehead City A??Ed . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTWNT OF TRANSPORTATION MICHAEL F. EASLEY GoVERNOR April 18, 2002 Mr. Bill Arrington, NCDOT Project Manager North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Morehead City District Office Hestron Plaza II 151-B Highway 24 Morehead City, NC 28557 Dear Mr. Arrington: LYNDO TIPPETT SECRETARY APR 2 ' 1002 SUBJECT: Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek Chowan County; Federal Aid No. BRZ-1207(1); State Project No. 8.2030201; TIP No. B-3435. The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace bridge No. 04 on SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County, North Carolina. The proposed project is intended to replace an obsolete bridge carrying SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County and resolve a long standing maintenance problem along SR 1207 in the vicinity of the bridge. Bridge Number 4 is a timber and steel bridge, with an asphalt v raring surface over timber decking. The decking is on steel I-beams supported by timber caps on timber piles. The bridge was constructed in 1950. The bridge has a clear roadway width of 5.9 meters (?9.2 feet) and is 48.7 meters (160 feet) long. The bridge has a sufficiency rating of 18.1 (out of a possible 100 points). The bridge is posted with a weight limit of 10 tons for trucks. SR 1207 in the vicinity of Bridge Number 4 has two 3.0 meter (10-foot) lanes and 1.2 meter (4- foot) grassed shoulders. The speed limit along SR 1207 in the project area is 55 MPH. Currently, approximately 500 vehicles per day cross Bridge Number 4. By the year 2025, this volume is expected to increase to 800 vehicles per day. It is estimated that tractor trailers and single unit trucks make up two percent each of this total. MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 .' TRANSPORTATION BUILDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET 1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC SR 1207 parallels the Chowan River in the vicinity of Rocky Hock Creek (see Figure 1 of the approved Categorical Exclusion). At one location north of the creek crossing, the roadway is less than 9 meters (30 feet) from the river's edge. An approximately 192 meter (630-foot) section of the roadway north of the existing bridge has settlement problems because of the mucky nature of the soils in the area. This section of roadway is also prone to flooding due to wind tides. The project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge Number 4 carrying SR 1207 over Rocky Hock Creek in Chowan County. The project also involves the removal of an approximately 195 meter (639-foot) long section of existing pavement and fill from the floodplain of Rocky Hock Creek north of the existing bridge. A new bridge approximately 259 meters (850 feet) long will be constructed to carry SR 1207 over the floodplain and creek. SR 1207 will be closed during construction and traffic rerouted along existing roads. The project area and the studied detour route are shown on Figure 1 in the approved Categorical Exclusion. The proposed new bridge will have a clear roadway width of 8.4 meters (28 feet). Two 3.3 meter (11-foot) lanes and 1.2 meter (4-foot) grassed shoulders will be provided on both approaches to the proposed bridge. A design speed of 100 km/h (60 MPH) is proposed for this project. It is anticipated SR 1207 will be signed at 55 MPH following project completion. As noted above, the project is located near the confluence of Rocky Hock Creek and the Chowan River. The geographic location and topography of this site lead to an overwhelming majority of the area surrounding the current SR 1207 and bridge No. 04 being comprised of wetlands and/or surface waters. The main wetland complex, through which the existing causeway and bridge are located, is dominated by a cypress-gum swamp community. This community type comprises 90 percent of the project area and occurs adjacent to SR 1207 and the banks of Rocky Hock Creek, except where human development or disturbance has displaced it. Approximately 0.17 acres of wetland will be filled by the proposed project. The project will also require 0.04 acres of wetland to be mechanically cleared to provide room for bridge construction. Originally, the proposed project planned to replace bridge No. 04 with a bridge of similar length as the existing bridge and included measures to alleviate the constant settlement and flooding problems on SR 1207 adjacent to the Chowan River. The original plan to stabilize SR 1207 called for the elevation of the existing roadbed to be increased by several feet. This would have necessitated a widening of the existing shoulder cross-section, and a considerable amour*.?f new fill in the high quality wetlands adjacent to SR 1207 would have been needed. In order to reduce impacts to wetlands, extending bridge No. 04 was recommended. It was determined that a longer 13?idge would reduce impacts to wetlands as well as eliminate the settlement and flooding problems along SR 1207. The new, longer bridge will now span approximately 639.0' of previously filled wetlands. The existing causeway will be removed and returned to an elevation resembling that of the adjacent wetlands. The removal of the old causeway will mean that approximately 0.6 acres of fill will be removed from wetlands associated with Rocky Hock Creek and the Chowan River. After the causeway is removed, the same wind tides that presented a flooding problem for SR 1207 will now represent a return to the natural hydrologic cycle for the surrounding wetlands. The water will be able to flow unimpeded beneath the new structure, allowing the natural wetland hydrology to return. As was done on the R-2539 project in Craven County, the NCDOT asks that enhancement mitigation credit be granted for the wetland area that will benefit from the improved hydrology. Approximately 639.0 feet of existing causeway will be lifted, restoring the riverine wetland underneath. The NCD.OT proposes riverine wetland enhancement extending outward from the lifted causeway. The area of enhancement will be calculated as a'/4 circle, the radius of which is the length of the causeway removed. The total enhancement area will equal 7.36 acres. Over the years, there has been a significant amount of settlement of the existing causeway. As a result of this settlement and the constant maintenance needed for continued operation of SR 1207, the NCDOT anticipates there may be some areas where the amount of fill material, including asphalt, may be 8.0 feet deep or greater. The NCDOT intends to ensure the removal of this material to prevent potential contamination of the adjacent Chowan River and Rocky Hock Creek. However, there is the potential for a void to be left in place of the removed causeway. As has been the case in the past with similar projects of this nature, the NCDOT proposes to fill these voids with clean, unconsolidated sand. The voids will be filled to within 6.0" to 1.0' of the elevation of the surrounding wetlands. The intent of this is to provide a base substrate while allowing the natural hydrologic processes to move organic material and sediment into the top 6.0" to 1.0'. In summary, the NCDOT proposes to replace the current bridge and causeway along SR 1207 with a new bridge. Approximately 639.0' of existing causeway will be removed and the elevation restored to resemble the adjacent wetlands. The project will require 0.17 acres of permanent fill in wetlands and 0.04 acres of mechanized clearing to accommodate the new bridge approaches. The removal of the causeway will result in a net gain of 039 acres (0.6-0. 21). The project will also vastly improve the hydrology and function of 7.36 acres of surrounding wetlands. The NCDOT asks that the 0.39 acres of restoration and the 7.36 acres of enhancement be allowed as credits on future projects within the Chowan River Basin. The NCDOT is aware of at least one future project, TIP project B- 3636 on SR 1222, that is actually on Rocky Hock Creek a few miles upstream of the current project. Should mitigation be required on B-3636, the NCDOT would like the option to use credits received from the removal of the causeway on B-3435. The NCDOT hereby requests that this project be authorized by the issuance of a Coastal Area Management Act Major Development Permit. Please find attached the completed MP forms along with the appropriate permit drawings. The certified mail "green cards" from the adjacent riparian landowner notifications are also included. The NCDOT has also requested authorization from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers under separate cover. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call Mr. Lindsey Riddick of my staff at (919) 733-7844, extension 304. Sincerely, APP 2 12002 \ !? C , 511? V 1 l William D. Gilmore, PE, Manager v Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch CC: w/attachment Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington Mr. Mike Bell, USACE, Washington Mr. Doug Huggett, NCDCM, Raleigh Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality Mr. Greg Perfetti, P. E., Structure Design w/o attachment Mr. John Alford, P. E., Roadway Design Mr. David Rhodes, P. E., Programming and TIP Ms. Debbie Barbour, P. E., Highway Design Mr. David Chang, P. E., Hydraulics Mr. Jamie Lancaster, Roadside Environmental Mr. D. R. Conner, P. E., Division One Engineer Mr. Jay McInnis, Project Planning Engineer Form DCM-M -1 APPLICATION (To be completed by all applicants) '4 4 noz b. City, town, community or landmark 1. APPLICANT Macedonia c. Street address or secondary road number SR 1207, Rocky Hock Creek Road a. Landowner: , d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning Name N. C. Department of Transportation jurisdiction? Yes X No Address 1548 Mail Service Center City Raleigh State NC Zip 27699-1548 Day Phone 919-733-3141 Fax 919-733-9794 b. Authorized Agent: Name William D. Gilmore. PE Address Same as above City Zip Day Phone Fax State N.C. c. Project name (if any) B-3435 NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), and/or project name. 2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river, creek, sound, bay) Rocky Hock Creek 3. DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE OF PROPOSED PROJECT a. List all development activities you propose (e.g. building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and excavation and/or filling activities. Replace existing bridge with a new bridge b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial use? Public Give a brief description of purpq"se, use, methods of construction and daily operations of proposed project. If more space is needed, please attach additional pages. Provide public transportation, top down construction will be used to reduce impacts to Rocky Hock Creek and wetlands a. County Chowan 4. LAND AND WATER CHARACTERISTICS a. Size of entire tract N/A b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or NWL d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract Dorovon Muck e. Vegetation on tract fescue, bald cypress, swamp tupelo, wax in rtle, pickerel weed Man-made features now on tract Existing bridge, roadway and utilities g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land classification of the site? (Consult the local land use plan.) X Conservation Transitional Developed Community X Rural Other How is the tract zoned by local government? N/A Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning? X Yes No (Attach zoning compliance certificate, i(applicable) Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? X Yes No If yes, by whom? NCDOT k. Is the project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a National Register listed or eligible property? Yes X No Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes _ No Coastal (marsh) X Other If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes (Attach documentation, ifavailable) m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities. N/A Describe location and type of discharges to waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges.) Surface runoff will be carried down to spill trough shill through scopes at bridge ends o. Describe existing drinking water supply source. N/A 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be submitted: • A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties. If the applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project. • An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.) Please note that original drawings are preferred and only high quality copies will be acepted. Blue-line prints or other larger plats are accej table only if an adequate number of quality copies a e provided by applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site. Include highway or secondary road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and the like. •A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary. RPvkPfi n114a Form DCM-MP-1 •A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant further certifies that such notice has been provided. Name Address Phone Name Address Phone Name Address Phone See attached list • A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates. • A check for $400 made payable to the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the application. • A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. • A sta1ement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to 10) If the project involves the expenditure of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act. 6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND the application. The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions contained in the permit. I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolina's approved Coastal Management Program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact, grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of the project. I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge. This is the 1 day of, 19 2? L Print Name C_ Signature - '-- Landowner or Authorized Ant Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed project. X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information DCM MP-3 Upland Development DCM MP-4 Structures Information X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts DCM MP-6 Marina Development NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment in the space provided at the bottom of each form. yon 2002 I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in Form DCM-MP-2 EXCAVATION AND F ILL (Except bridges and culverts) Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or fill activities. All values to be given in feet. Average Final Existing Project Length Width Depth Depth Access channel (MLW) or (NWL) Canal Boat basin Boat ramp Rock groin Rock breakwater Other (Excluding shoreline stabilization) 200' 300' 195' 2-15' 5-15' 5-10' 1. EXCAVATION a. Amount of material to be excavated from below MHW or NWL in cubic yards 225 b. Type of material to be excavated old roadway embankment between proposed and existing bridge ends c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAVs) or other wetlands? Yes X No d. High ground excavation in cubic yards 2170 this is the same existine roadwav embankment listed in la. that is above mean high water 2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL a. Location of disposal area to be determined by contractor b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A c. Do you claim title to disposal area? . Yes X No If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner. d. Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance? _ Yes X No If yes, where? Revised 03195 e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? Yes X No f. Does the disposal include any area in the water? Yes X No 3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION N/A a. Type of shoreline stabilization Bulkhead Riprap b. Length If Yes, (1) Amount of material to be placed in the water None (2) Dimensions of fill area 0-15 x 750' (3) Purpose of fill to construct roadway embankment for bridge approaches b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs or other wetlands? Yes X No c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL If yes, (1) Dimensions of fill area (2) Purpose of fill 5. GENERAL e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months (Source of information) f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below water level (1) Riprap (2) Bulkhead backfill h. Type of fill material i. Source of fill material 4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES (Excluding Shoreline Stabilization) a. Will Till material be brought to site? X Yes No APR 2 ZOOZ a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion controlled? NCDOT High Quality Erosion Control Methods Will be used b. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)? Standard heavy highway construction equipment c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? Yes X No If yes, explain steps that will be taken tc -.lessen environmental impacts. Applicant o Probe N e Signatpre gTtk U Date Form DCM-MP-5 BRIDGES AND CULVERTS Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this proposed project. 1. BRIDGES a. Public X Private b. Type of bridge (construction material) 17 spans at 50'; 21" cored slab c. Water body to be crossed by bridge Rocky Hock Creek d. Water. depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or NWL +/- 11' e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? X Yes No If Yes, (1) Length of existing bridge 160' (2) Width of existing bridge 19' (3) Navigation . clearance underneath existing bridge 3' (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be removed? (Explain) all of the existing bridge will be removed f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? Yes X No If yes, (1) Length of existing culvert (2) Width of existing culvert (3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above the MHW or NWL (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be removed? (Explain) g. Length of proposed bridge 850' h. Width of proposed bridge 28' i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands 6.5' at highest point j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow? X Yes No If yes, explain the new bridge will be considerably Longer than the current bridge. The existing causeway will be removed, increasing the potential for sheet flow (due to wind tides) to enter adjacent wetlands k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge +/- 4' 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by reducing or increasing the existing navigable opening? X Yes No If yes, explain Navigable opening will be increased m Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing no navigable waters? Yes X No If yes, explain n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard concerning their approval? Yes X No If yes, please provide record of their action. 2. CULVERTS N/A a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed b. Number of culverts proposed Revised 03/95 Form DCM-MP-5 AF'1 2002 c. Type of culvert (construction material, style) (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic yards 225 (same as MP2 question l.a) d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? Yes No b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert If yes, require any excavation within: NO (1) Length of existing bridge _ Coastal Wetlands - SAVs _ Other Wetlands (2) Width of existing bridge If yes, (3) Navigation clearance underneath existing (1) Length of area to be excavated bridge (2) Width of area to be excavated (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic removed? (Explain) yards e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert Yes No require any highground excavation? If yes, X Yes No (1) Length of existing culvert If yes, (2) Width of existing culvert (1) Length of area to be excavated 650' (3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above (2) Width of area to be excavated 45' the MHW or NWL (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be yards 2170 (same as in MP2 question l.d) removed? (Explain) d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves any excavation, please complete the following: (1) Location of the spoil disposal area f. Length of proposed culvert To be determined by contractor g. Width of proposed culvert (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area N/A h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area? MHW or NWL Yes X No If no, attach a letter granting permission from i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? the owner. Yes No (4) Will the disposal area be available for future If yes, explain maintenance? Yes X No (5) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands? j. Will the proposed r;,Lvert affect existing navigation Yes X No potential? Yes No If yes, give dimensions if different from (2) If yes, explain above. (6) Does the disposal area include any area below the MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 3. EXCAVATION AND FILL above. a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any excavation below the MHW or NWL? result in any fill (other than excavated material X Yes No described in Item d. above) to be placed below If yes, MHW or NWL? Yes X No (1) Length of area to be excavated 150' If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated 20' (1) Length of area to be filled (3) Depth of area to be excavated 2' (2) Width of area to be filled (3) Purpose of fill Form DCM-MP-S f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any fill (other than excavated material described in Item d. above) to be placed within: _ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands If yes, (1) Length of area to be filled 310', 210'. 215' (2) Width of area to be filled 13', 8', 8' (3) Purpose of fill Bridge approaches g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert result in any fill (other than excavated material described in Item d. above) to be placed on highground? X Yes No If yes, (1) Length of area to be filled 300' (2) Width of area to be filled 65' (3) Purpose of fill roadway fill 4. GENERAL a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation? X Yes No If yes, explain in detail On-site, see cover letter b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of any existing utility lines? Yes X No If yes, explain in detail c. Will the proposed project require the construction of any temporary detour structures? Yes X No If yes, explain in detail d. Will the proposed project require any work channels? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2 e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion controlled? NCDOT High Quality Waters Erosion Control Methods will be used f. What type of construction equipment will be used (for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic dredge)? Heavy highway construction equipment g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? Yes X No If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen environmental impacts. h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert require any shoreline stabilization? X Yes No If yes, explain in detail Class II rip-rap on bridge Spill through slopes ://1 C. 1,0" Applicant orProjje-ct e Signature ?(l)( IIt 0? Date RPViCPJ nzioc 1(J/ 1216 <? 1213 1214 .l 'o 1315 1211 p? 1212 BURNED uuc 5 .1 5 POND •6 2 ? 5 1210 s ? ? 120 a, n 1207 \ ` tondnq 1.4 _ • 1211 122 1 1316 ` PROJE E 4 p Valhalla s • 1 &?% 1271 - , •` e S 2.2 1316 •? N 1317 i 200 . 1319 ' 1207 1206 / 0 ,o ? 9 ? • ? y ? 1318 ? . P ? • ,? Mace donia \ \ 1207. '6` 1316 • 1209 I Hanoo& 1205 w 1242 1208 1.3 I EDENTON J 1200 t - 1 121 P y l 1 L 1202 0 - am `? Q - ? ens 1 ? 1203 VICINITY MAPS N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CHOWAN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2030201 (B-3435) REPLACE BRIDGE ;; 4 ON SR 1207 OVER ROCKYHOCK CREEK SHEET I OF l Z 10123/01 I LEGEND -'-WLB----- WETLAND BOUNDARY WETLAND CL gm DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATER (POND) ® DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND ® DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN SURFACE WATER • DENOTES MECHANIZED • CLEARING FLOW DIRECTION TB -_ TOP OF BANK WE - EDGE OF WATER - -c - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT - -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL ?- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY - - NG- - NATURAL GROUND - -P1, - PROPERTY LINE - TIDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT - EAB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED ANIMAL BOUNDARY - EPB - • EXIST. ENDANGERED PLANT BOUNDARY - -1 --- - WATER SURFACE XX xXX X X LIVE STAKES C2D BOULDER --- CORE FIBER ROLLS PROPOSED BRIDGE PROPOSED BOX CULVERT PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT 12'-48' (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES & ABOVE 0 SINGLE TREE WOODS LINE DRAINAGE INLET ROOTWAO m2l RIP. RAP 5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER OR PARCEL NUMBER IF AVAILABLE BZ1 BUFFER ZONE I 8Z2 BUFFER ZONE 2 N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CHOW AN COUNTY PROJECT: 8.2030201 (B-3435) REPLACE BRIDGE a4 ON SR 1207 OVER ROCKYHOCK CREEK SHEET y OF / Z f ? 00+01 3N17 14JI n LLJ CC , 0 o II m I 4; z II co LLJ a cz Q -;)q II ' ? ? I I II m 3 I I I ? N iL- g Iw x w D U I CL w LL :2 • v ! CL Q 2 I ? N W o I-el Q W 'M J O p CD ? us -M vi J _J I LLI Ir II z C w `' ? a a ? M z U F 0 F' O U x ® 0 cn ? ® U z Q U o ° 00 U w 9 W Q w x u > O r z i CL x 0 V v iJ v Z LLJ N p j 71 W D Q w z J m o k? w co U "' 3 Z P , CL ? w N a t? z ? < N J 0 J ?U Lij m z w 3 00 z0 3 W z p z g z II J Y N O g ULO oz cy- LLJ W Ct 4q w x a LL a O LL- -i ;9 I 3c C7 wU I-3 O II to v p z LP I w w0 O it III o I ?C I f 3 • ?• LCl Q I I 1 N V' rod `' 0 0 3 Ln F 7 00+8/ 3Nn 14o-Lv N x w p i W Y Q 3 co N 0 a ° 0 J 3 J W Io°b 4q \ ?o • II ? o 0 o II ? I x ?m 41 I ? LLJ I 0 i I N ?I Q (I I II I I Ii ? I II w I co b z W ?I II I THI I I ? o+I I s I I III ? ? I NII I X11 I II z 0 3 a z N N7 "' a z 0 W u u f Q o H x z ® ® U z 3 9 c°i ?: U g p 9 0 _ v "q? W 0 E z w CL O F- 0 Z h J _ m m0 J ?z 0 0? m L) o z Fm o N O 0 w J lf') Q N U N O 00+N 3Nn MOldW 004 ZZ 3N17 HJIM f ** x O r r `co? CL LLI CY *?r IL a a / ? L- I ` / N o C) N II I? ?_ J w 0 l I o z N I REEK w N??K?UENCE} w ccr, I Rp? p?- INF I- i 3 I tt U I 1 / -- I N j joWNSiOZ I X \?0 NNSt11P i I - - I 2NO ? I I I I I r I ' -- ? I ? O ? t I Y? L'i { I Q F CO ti . J ? II cce- H., U.1- 00+9/ 3N17 14oivn z 0 ., 0 x+. F p -4 U x Z 0 U o tt? 9 ? r? o E-' z O E:; U b o u C") 0 z O Z N D m m z 0 W ~ 0 U) LO A m U P -3- I 1 00 Zo 44 O 4q O -41 O in N O 0 i J In Q N u N 7 O W z z 0 U z W Li.. x J Q (n W w w N J 03 LLJU z o w z o w 0 r . e r ? C) O Q) Q) x LL- W N x ; I I 4 J W I I I I' Q I J ? ? 5Z ? ? I?? I ? z ? z C C) ® ?, 3 .n ?o W cn 7 W W U c r Z y x :Z) U 4 Q U U C ? Q 0 o n. r U O lr L z o \ O z I I co o O? I' m O J "' b > s k? m 1I ;I mo o o z J I ?I , J zi 0Z O w ?r Q. J ?° L'i r at V) m L) O 0-1 r i w Z = I LL. U CL W P ? (1 zo O ? N V) x _ l.n 1 ? I I O 11 ? I w t 9 ? , - o ?J I ? w I 1 3 I Lo < N U W I N 41 0 ? ? ? 1 p O oy? ?? I I f I = w N_ Z / Z I I c ?- / = Z J p co o ui U. w rr Z w w I / Q w J Lo ? U) i w w i wV I-3 1 a ~O Z U W p {iJ 1 p 7t` I U Q.. ? ? 00-b 30 3Nn 14j1dW ,•* F b ? ?,UO2 O O O O z o c°. z F o A x o z o j z o U z a U M ' o ? ? ? o Cn Z 0 w A a ? U ? 9 ? o ? o x W ` \ c _ r F M U A a' a'?, o ? O C\j 0 ® z lc?f .'1 J Z LL a LLZ'9 O s O ® Z w 0 b O_ t1? ? o 0 N_ f o ? o O - M O n O L15 J a U) U L, N ?O O O O I O w c? p m z w CC) W a c? p W (A O CL O CL W p a CD O z V) X W r\ zz O C4 1 ? 1 Q) 'Id M C? I -j a p < J x 7 7 1 D (D (n -4 `r U Q + O Q 0 4 r un x z H Q G U Q 00 u Q 7 E-? o E: -4 ® U w Lea `. u I z ? J p C Oj + I- O z? O0 ?- J aQ I > c Q D U t- X Q W Z I J ? I Q O O Q ? + M N N Q J b O O Z ?- \ N ~ X W O O + O t J ? cn F- W Q O O + W F- N N Z Q O C:: w J O LL O J Q ct: ? CL O ? I- p Q z C O O O N ? o w 0 0 Lc) ii O n W W J J I.n Q Q N U Lf) U cn c/) O h ? r-I V) La ? W - C? E-• w 0 7 C7 ?D t?? O I CD x 0 c ;? N ? Z O c:. Q °o 9 m o I 9 p F- p ?', J , I F '? O U C Ln C ; U Q U W C) 4 LLJ U ? C. o I c:v U I 1 N I --? I O I O J L(1 O I + lot Ln N ti O to - + pj Z r? - I Q ? W Y I p Q > N N z 1- W J r 0 O O cn W- ? A y, ; ti / OD2 Ci I I J Q I ? I- J Q I Z W m O O + Q I O CD N I ? X I W I I O I z J O O O O Z M O -? Ln + Q 0 N ; • F- Q I acc: N F- ? N , w aF O " U " N U Q S CL w > u 0 xZ W O Ln O It o II - - ui W J J Q Ln Q Ln U N u N N O O I l I In O n O M W 0 CD 0 z O 0 J Q F-- Q Z I` I/ I C a cc: 0- o oz i = ~o N z x I N O_ U I J F J I U Q Q I > cr- a? U I- xa W Z o I i w \ J O O N N J Q E. V) ? ~ "C W ? ? v ® all U W z O O N .? I W C7 co CD Z 1- _N x W b 0 I J I O O N f O O U) N_ O O In If O W I Ln Q N U N I ' - O OOI O O O F- cr- W O II W J a In U N Q -FO E c ca m r O O N Z U) O C/1 '« C U a I- Q N m a " U E w a O a W LL Q aU E v c W U O LL ^ O ? C U to o co a .. O N?N { i C j U O N . . Q Z . LL D ^ O 0) = O O v co .L4 C: 'a c *= O F'- U M L fU6 v S U m U g Q ? CL 2 C N O O (n E ' ~ U (0 U > a? ca a x W c ui a CL z _ o J LL Z w E n J F- C W C O ?q O C _ co a O C ? N j Q N CL p 0 J ? U co g N N Cn U (n Z ) Q Q W a O U 0 0 to O u') N cu E J O O N LL v 00 O N O Z cn Q F- O F- U ^ Cl) O ~ m Z Q = OU o Cl) O Z N Q LL z co 00 O F- a U w W -? 0 0 O U d Z N O Cl) Zv O W W S U) , ? Y