20021702 Ver 1_Complete File_20021017

MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1584 YANCEYVILLE STREET, GREENSBORO, NC 27415
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART NM-NT OF TRANSPORTATION
Mrs. Jean Manuele
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761
(Two Copies)
Ms. Cynthia Van der Wiele
Wetlands/401 Unit
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
(Three Copies)
dpaSU7Ev
ya
October 15, 2002
021702
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY

OCT

SUBJECT: Rockingham County, Replacement of Bridge # 120 on River Road (SR 2150) across
Big Branch Creek. USACE Action ID Number 20013118.
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is intended to inform the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) of modifications to
General Permit Verification 200121318, and provide a request for extension of the existing General
Permit (GP) Verification. In lieu of the proposed 1 @33' 2" X 11' 1" structural plate arch (SPA) on
footings with concrete headwall, the NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) intends to replace
the existing bridge with a 1 @25', 1 @40', 1 @25' cored slab bridge. Construction of the cored
bridge will allow NCDOT to span the entire creek, therefore, new permanent fill will not be placed
within the stream channel. Portions of the channel may require dewatering during construction. The
dewatering structures will be used to protect the construction area without stopping channel flow.
Anticipated impacts from the dewatering structures are 70-feet per channel side. Following
completion of the bridge replacement activity, all dewatering structures will be entirely removed, and
natural stream contours will be restored and seeded.
Regarding the extension of the existing GP Verification, the NCDOT anticipates beginning
construction in April of 2003; therefore, the proposed activity will not be covered under the existing
GP Verification. The NCDOT would like to request and extension of the existing GP verification to
November of 2003.
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Due to the lengthening of the proposed spans archeological surveys may be required prior to
beginning construction. Copies of the modifications are being submitted to Mr. Matt Wilkerson,
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch to facilitate archeological review.
Enclosed please find the Pre-construction Notification Form and documentation from the previous
Verification. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Dennis
Johnson at [phone] or Len Smith at [phone]. Your time and effort are appreciated.
Sincerely,
AA&
J.M. , P.E.
Di ' ion E gineer, Division 7
1_11/S16 I-
cc: Mr. Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS, Division Environmental Officer
Mr. Dennis Johnson, Bridge Maintenance Engineer
Mr. Donald Pearson, Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer
Mr. W.D. Watkins, Bridge Maintenance Supervisor, Caswell and Rockingham County
Mr. Matt Wilkerson, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Ms. Renee Gledhill-Earley
2

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
021742
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
N Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
? 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 3 & 33
(modification)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
. is not required, check here: N
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mr. J.M. Mills, P.E, Division Engineer - Division 7
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 14996
Greensboro, NC
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mmills(,dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Not Applicable
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Pagel of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name ofproject: Replacement of Bridge #120 - Rockingham County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 6.512428 (Non-TIP)
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Not Applicable
4. Location
County: Rockingham Nearest Town: Wentworth
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not Applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From the intersection of NC 65
and NC 87 in Wentworth proceed approximately 3.1 miles west on NC-65 to Settle Bridge
Road SR 2145). Turn left onto SR 2154 and proceed north for approximately 2.7 miles.
Turn left onto River Road (SR 2150) after crossing the Dan River. Bridge # 120 is located
Vproximately 1.75 miles from the junction of SR 2150 and SR 2145.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 17 06 02 322 E 00 40 30 028 N
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): Not Applicable
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Big Branch
8. River Basin: Roanoke
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Agricultural/Residential
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replace the existing 1@337" 1@34' 11' reinforced concrete deck bridge with a 1@25'.
1@40' 1@25' cored slab bridge. Equipment used will be standard road construction
equipment trackhoe grader, backhoe and bulldozer).
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The narrow bridge is being replaced to
increase traffic safety.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
This application is intended as a request for a permit modification and an extension of the current
General Permit Verification Action ID Number 20013118.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
Not Applicable
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Temporary stream impacts will result
from the placement of cofferdams.
1. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
eslno Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be. impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Not Anlicable
Total area of wetland impact proposed: Not Applicable
2. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im act Perennial or
Intermittent?
specify)

Bridge 120 Placement of
temporar g
structures
140
gig Branch
20'
Perennial

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mgpguest.coni, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 140- temporary tmo
Page 4 of 9
3. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Not Applicable
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Not Applicable
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimised once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impacts will onlv result from the placement of temporarv dewaterine structures within the
channel facilitate removal of an existing bent and prevent bank failure during the placement of
new bents on the bank. The narrow bridge must be replaced to increase traffic safety.. Impacts
will be minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of
wetland and surface waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters
of the US, and coordination (including a pre-construction meeting) with the Division
Environmental Officer.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
Page 5 of 9
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider. the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
.http://h2o.enr. state. nc. us/ncwetlands/strmgide. html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No mitigation is anticipated because the temporary jLn,pacts are less than 150 linear feet. In
addition the project will result in the removal of an existing bent that is currently located
within the channel bottom.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): Not Applicable
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): Not Applicable
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Applicable
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Applicable
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): Not Applicable
Page 6 of 9
.................. ....... _.. ....... .........
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 N/A 3
2 N/A 1.5
Total N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 7 of 9
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
Not Applicable
X1. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
The proposed activity involves the replacement of an existing structure with no addition to the
travel lane, therefore the percent new impervious surface equals 0%. Because the percent new
impervious surface is less than 30% stormwater controls are not being provided.
XH. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not Applicable
XHL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Due to the lengthening of the proposed spans archeological survey be required prior to
beginning construction. Spoke with Gerold Glover, Archeologist-PDEA on December 5, 2001
regarding surveys. Followed up on October 11, 2002 with Brian Overton, Archeologist-PDEA.
r
l-5
Agent's Signature 1Dati
is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. 200121318 County Rockingham
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/Agent: NCDOT/SR 2150/Bridge No. 120/6.512428
Address: Attn: Mt. J. M. Mills, P.E., Division Engineer
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Telephone No.: [phone]
Size and Location of project (waterway, road name/number, town, etc.): Bridge No. 120 on
SR 2150, approximately 500 feet west of SR 2151, near Wentworth, North Carolina. The project
is located adjacent to, and below the headwaters of, Big Branch.
Description of Activity
Mechanized landclearing, excavation and filling activities associated. with the replacement of the
existing bridge with a 33'2" X 1l'1 " structural plate arch (SPA) on footings with a concrete
headwall. The placement of either sand bags or sheet pile cofferdams are also authorized to
temporarily impact 70 linear feet of stream channel on either side of the creek for dewatering
during construction of the footings and headwalls.
X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
33 Nationwide General Permit.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above
may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This Department of the Army Regional General/Nationwide Permit verification does not relieve
the undersigned permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or
local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies
before beginning work.
By signature below, the permittee certifies an understanding and acceptance of all terms and
conditions of this permit.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date 20 September 2001 Expiratio ate 11 Feb 2002
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
September 12, 2001
Mr. Lenwood E. Smith, II, PWS
Division Seven Environmental Officer
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415
Dear M:. Smith:
Thank you for your letter of August 13, 2001, requesting comments or concurrence from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on the biological assessment for the James
spinymussel (Pleurobema collina) and the tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana) in the
vicinity of Bridge No. 120 on River Road (SR 2150) over Big Branch, a tributary to the Dan
River, Rockingham County, North Carolina. This report is provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
The Service considers this report to be an accurate representation of the survey and results for
these species, and their habitat. Based on the information provided, the Service concurs that
this project, implemented as described, will have "No Effect" on federally-listed mussels that
may occur in the region.
Note, however, that this concurrence applies only to the referenced species up to the date of
this report. Should additional information become available relative to the referenced species,
additional surveys may be required.
The Service appreciates the opportuniiy to comment on this document. Please advise us of
any changes in project plans. If you have any questions regarding these comments, contact
Tom McCartney at [phone], Ext. 32.
Sincerely,
^
//J
/s , r.
Garland B. Pardue
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc: COE, Raleigh, NC (Eric Alsmeyer)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:09/12/01:919/856-4520 extension 32:\SR2150.esp
federal Aid H 74 [A T1, P# O(At .C;oulzly: T.-oo5-l
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPEIt'I'IES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATION AL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Pf•njet-t Dtscrifrioir? ??`? ?-+A?#? t?-0 ?} ??. ?? ?C? ???
On , representatives of the
[' orth Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Ft.deral Highway Adininistration (FHWA)
r. -North Cato'.ina State Historic Preservation Office (SH O-)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
? String rnerting
Cistoric a.rchir.ectural resources photograph review sessionrconsultation
? Other
All parties prescut >li-iCed
? there are uo properties over fifty years old within the project's Aied of potential eff.Cts.
2-tfie'rv net no properties less than fifty years old which are Considered to meet Criteria Consideradon C
VhItLill the project'; area o:'potential effect..
J2'there are properties over fifty years old within the project's Area of Potential bffccts (APE), but based
an the historical information available and the photographs of each property, the property identified
as(.4-+st:-At sP16 PA isc ?onsid . not i i igble for the National Register anti no turdf er evaluation of it
is necessa+y. Js '
[JL't5-re are no National Register-listi d prirpemics within the project's area of potential effects.
all properties greater than So years of age located in the A N.b have heen considered at this consultation,
and based upon the above concurrence, all compliance for historic architecture with Section 106 of
the National Historic Presclvation act and GS 1'. 1-12(c) has been completed for this project.
Signed:
Pnpre.,%antative, WDOT Date
Date
FHWA., forthe r) %isinn Arltninistralnr, or other Federal Agency
' . iii; ? .,•'4?Cr re.'.('??i?f.?-t?..•?? _ i !?=' ?i J
Rcp>•c9entati?•e. SH1'0
State. Historic Fresely diaa
ALG
ir:+ cimc1' report is lncpued• a final copy rf this form and the attuchaJ lilt will be iac:ud:d.
gl?.
B.O.B. STA. 10+Z14
,?:r?g?,:
l:i RIP.-RA.P.._ \_
SR-2150 _
k
---a-?? CORED SLAB
x.5 , Lio', 25 WOODS
(P K)

18,, BST

X-A
X?
25YR. WS. EL. 92.7
CL--gRX FORD 0 C ETE) IOOYR.WS. EL.94.2
PROP. AREA:5I5 sq.-ft.
NOTE: IF BRG. ALTO IS TO B B ILT,
PLEASE CONTACT H UICS UNIT FOR
SCOUR COMPUTATI S.
PASTURE
B
N