20020676 Ver 1_Complete File_20020502

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
NCDENR
May 9, 2002
Re: Permit Application for proposed replacement of Bridge Number 40 on SR 1100 over the South Hyco
Creek in Person County
DWQ No. 020676
Dear Mr. Nance:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
The project as presently proposed calls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The waters being
impacted are classified as WS II HQW. The application provides only a plan for the project. No
cross-section or stream profile information is provided. Given that the project plans to replace a bridge
with a con span structure, we need the requested information to assist in the determination that the
project will not result in a destabilization of the stream. In addition, please assess the potential for an
upstream and downstream cross vane to be constructed at the project site. Also, provide the proposed
design specifications for the cross vane installation. If you believe the requested design changes are
problematic, please provide additional information detailing the engineering rationale, and provide an
alternative design that provides for stream stability.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h.0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Sincerely,
Joh R. Dorney
Water Quality Certification Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
C:\ncdot\SR 1100\conespondence\020676hid.doc
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
joy')
D u e ,gip ?? WETLANDS 1401 GROUP
CO I3
JUL 2 2 2004
STATE OF NORTII CAROLINA ,VA'[ FR WALPY SECTION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO "TIPPET"T
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
July 20, 2004
N.C. Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. John Hennessy
NCDOT Coordinator
Subject: Replacement of Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to
South Hyco Creek on SR 1 100 in Person County. NCDOT State Project No.
5.3852008.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to replace Bridge No. 40
over an unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek within the Roanoke River Basin in
Person County (Figure 1 and Figure 2). This unnamed tributary [DWQ Index No. 22-58-4-
(0.5)] has a Best Usage Classification of WS-II. High Quality Water Guidelines will be
followed during project construction. The existing three-span bridge (l @? 17'9", 1 u) 17', &
1 t) 17'9") was constructed in 1956 and has a timber floor on timber joist piles. This bridge
is currently in very poor condition; it is structurally deficient with a sufficiency rating of l?l
36 out of 100 points. It has been determined that this structure must be replaced.
A Water Quality Certification No. 3375 (DWQ Project No. 020676) as is eus d"car this
project dated June 4, 2002. This certification approved the p acement of fill material in
87 linear feet of streams for replacing Bridge No. 40. This 87 linear feet of fill was associated
with the proposal to replace the existing bridge with a 60 foot long con span bottomless
structure in addition to filling a 27 linear feet portion of an intermittent tributary. This
tributary was to be filled and relocated due to its proximity to the proposed structure.
It has been determined that the geology at this site is not suitable for the installation of a
bottomless culvert. Therefore, NCDOT now proposes to replace the existing bridge with a
new bridge. The proposed bridge will be a two-span structure (I@ 61'3" & 1 @ 31'3") which
will span the stream with the bents placed outside of the stream channel on high ground. This
current proposal eliminates the previously reported impacts and it involves only the proposal
to place 60 feet of rip rap along both banks under the bridge for BANK STABILIZATION
(Figure 3 and 4).

Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
1002
\
X6 'o"
66 2 I \
!? \\ ^? III II? 65°?
l,,/ 11 V - r \
111 i. ?I^ '1 I I \\
IV,
p '• Cem 575
111\
%
11 0 : ?? \\\ 1100
. .•,. jj .. - - Q .. - 'O ; .. 1 ? 6JJ js: hy,? o+ .. 1l1 - - . Q .
1
_ ? it i?-r? - ; ?• .. 00`
N _ -
q 0\? I B M I I t
i= rr \ 67 ?' 1 ` 1111 / ul
54
_ 1101 tir
i
1111 p
^\ \\\ -4°.? I \\ X00
1
49 I / -. it I
1718 _ i 1? 111 I I1O)o
10
C, k )!? )1 \ f i O? \ii ??\ ?i yo 1 II
?, 11 (? I ( ,11 1?`` _?, , , A II l ? ?`T II , 111 ( l '?- ) ? • -7
?,? JII ;lam) ?? ?\ J? )`j?/? ,,c r j !?? ?;?` 1 ?'I "?7?` // ?I I 1\/? ,? r ?\1l l4 ??
V f , __J'\l) Qii ??1? '?\ J, ?: ? ll.- I _ \ ?, ?, !^•?i ?\,
ProjectSitei?-
II
i
40
VII\J
?ibs° j ???ll !? 1 S ? j 1'??;- ???`l ti ° J ?If l^ )??1\ • (?\1\.' '? 1 IT
'0
?? ??r 1 ?l; ????,; -•?????,? ??'I ?j,.-?.? ? - J III) i Q 1,r?-? r???-??., ?:'1l? - ! ? ? ?.
Ailr"-
V ?L(n/olrp I?'?1 ?! h 1r/?1?iQ n1 - \f 40
\U
l f/
12
1
9(
Ji'?? ? ?v? •- I?? ??, ,v -? ? ? ' / ? ? \ „1 ?/ ?? IS I _ `•? ? I ? 1 ('? ? ? ll'J FE
a
SHEET NUNMBER 13
SOIL SURVEY OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROM?
c l ^ a7
>!i•?A,.
'?_ 'km
,,^' •; " ? S?:,F?` ' aid `"? ? y' . U
tc,
g 9 J 7% Y
h '?1? x!k 1 ,?firr{ K.
'
WkD (Joins sheet 9)
m t?@e m. WkB.•? En EnB G .?
w
?QWeD Wk8 EQC'
Cw EnB '
WkD
3
Val ,aG V • ',Wk xl
Ke8 m
f no kF F? ?. P$
O n(f ` S r 1Nel
Project Site
4

xk ?
N rh hl?r•i

'

.
Y 'x.' '? 'J+N 4? 11117k... I
?
?:'. ?•?. i, ?`. , "
? t ...k Sid

All"
et"
3???,?. k
y
\

A
?
? 1 ? ?Y?
41, Y
'

,x t

? • ? ?faf t?i'?4
i. • * by Y ? 4, 1. i.'
J?
k r•[?'A
Y .
a kN
r (? Cyr,
N' •s
y A y -. •
it M, V. 1y,,, A
V.."v'?x.1, a.. y,
R ?x••1
4
WeD APC APB 79°07'30'
36k
aB
CaC ;i i., t1
APC Ce.
VaB
ac .
a
!* #`5
4{ J a
rs` y .r
•w?•1 •? '1
f •.
N ?? 5

r
v; ?•?
Project Study Area
Bridge No. 40 on SR 1100
Person County
Person County Soil Survey
USDA-NRCS (1995)
Figure 2 1:24,000
OO+II
M
N M
0

to ?

?
F 00+0I
05
0_ U
Q H
0: D
m
Cl- a
H LL.
Of
D:
H LJ
H H
J
N H
In
Q
V3 /
i
T
2
0
ti
yN
OZ
V
U~
Q
ti
Q: Cu
CL U
CL Q
H Ll-
ct
Of
H W
H F-
J
N H
N LL_
a
J \
U 3

a? c

v ? y
y
U
v
?
1"q ?1

Z
CL w
N
V o
ti
Q
N
cr- ~
oti
z CO
00+6
i
I?
i
g

?1
LO
N

m

8
ry) (/)
+?

rN??
+O
U 4
W NUJ
wW
r)V)
(n
Q QCr_ U? O J
N
WT
Lij
+ W
Q
?g
1
V O \
11
W
±

+o V)

LO Q
N
c
Q? U-i

O oc
O
?;
V)

I
I

? co

W owl
' Ln ? +I
W i ?a
JJ

+ O
J w `?
W ?
.
Q oz
?ii3 U-
@W I Q
Co
? I
0
W

W A ?( LO
m°?W
m
.g
O
w Ice
N
O
w
V
z
0
Q
W
J
8 u-
0
+ O
w w
+ m
_m
rn
m
8
+
+
8 R 98 ° ?co
M
II
W
J
V
N

M
06,
[ o ii

= a F5
b o > 40
u en

I ?

L
Summary
This project is located within the Roanoke River Basin and proposes no fill in surface waters.
The proposed 60 feet of bank stabilization as described will disturb less than the 500 feet
threshold for requiring written notification and concurrence. Therefore, we are not requesting
written concurrence for this activity. However, we do intend to utilize Section 401 Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3399 and Department of Army Section 404 Nationwide
Permit 13 for this activity. The NCDOT will comply with all applicable WQC and NWP
conditions for bank stabilization. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please contact Ms. Heather Montague at [phone].
7ivision Nance, P.E.
Engineer
cc: Eric Alsmeyer, USACE
Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT
Robert Liverman, NCDOT
John Kearney, NCDOT
Jeremy Goodwin, NCDOT
`O??F vvH?FgPG
co
June 4, 2002
Person Countv
DWQ Project No. 020676
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Dear Mr. Nance:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 87
linear feet of streams for the purpose of replacing Bridge Number 40 on SR 1 100 over the South llyco Creek. The
project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated April 29, 2002 and the subsequent addendum
dated May 17, 2002. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this till is covered by General Water
Quality Certification Number 3375. This certification corresponds to the Nationwide Permit 14 issued by the Corps
of Engineers. In addition, you should acquire any other federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Watershed
regulations. This approval will expire with the accompanying 404 permit, unless otherwise specified in the Water
Quality Certification.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the DWQ and submit it new application. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter, and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to streams (now or in the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required as
described in 15A NCAC 211 .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification.
1.) Upon completion of the project, the NCDOT shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of
Completion Form" to notify DWQ when all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. "file
responsible party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of
Water Quality upon completion of the project.
2.) The NCDOT shall strictly adhere to sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices as descrihed for
High Quality Waters entitled "Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 0411 .0024) throughout
design and construction of the project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. YOU must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms
to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
f*a
NCDE!
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 [phone]
Customer Service: 1 800 6237748
Zwucnaei I . CHsley, uuvulilui
W illiam G. Ross Jf., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environrnent and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
\o??F vv N /??pG
?7
r-
o <-
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact John Ilennessy a1919-7,)3-5094 or Steve Mitchell at 919-571-4700.
Sincerely.
ktii W. Klimek,
P.F.?
ii
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Michael t-. Easley, UuveruUi
Williarn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
c:\ncdot\SR 1107\wqc\020676wgc.doc:
f

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 17, 2002
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands/401 Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. John Dorney
Supervisor
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Replacement of Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to
South Hyco Creek on SR 1100 in Person County. NCDOT State Project
No. 5.3852008. DWQ Project No. 020676.
Reference: 1. NCDOT Permit Application (April 29, 2002).
2. NCDENR-DWQ notice indication HOLD status of project (May 9,
2002)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek on SR 1100 in
Pers o ty. The replacement structure is 1@ 28 feet x 6 feet con span with endwalls
that ' 60 f t long. A permit application outlining impacts associated with this project
was sub ted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and copied to the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water
Quality (NCDENR-DWQ) on April 29, 2002. The project was placed on hold by the
NCDENR-DWQ by letter dated May 9, 2002. The letter states:
• The project as presently proposed calls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The
waters being impacted are WS-II HQW. The application provides only a plan for the
project. No cross section or stream profile information is provided. Given that the
project plans to replace a bridge with a con span structure, we need the requested
information to assist in the determination that the project will not result in a
destabilization of the stream. In addition, please assess the potential for an upstream
and downstream cross vane to be constructed at the site. Also, provide the proposed
design specifications for the cross vane installation. If you believe the requested
design changes are problematic please provide additional information detailing the
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
N
._,, --engineering rationale, and provide an alternative design that provides for stream
st abt
....--.lease note Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, (new) Figure 4, (new) Figure 5 and
tnd!!ure 6. Figure 1 depicts the location of the project on the most recent USGS
topographic map. Figure 2 depicts the location of the project on the Person County Soil
Survey. Figure 3 provides a plan view of the project. New Figure 4 provides the
hydraulic design/analysis of the project including plan view and profile. New Figure 5
provides a bed profile. New Figure 6 provides the county map indicating the location of
the project site.
The proposed structure is located on footings that will be located on top of
exposed surficial bedrock. Exposed surficial bedrock is located within the stream bed,
which will serve as natural in-stream grade control. Therefore, the stream bed is
currently stable and can be anticipated to remain stable after construction. Additionally,
the con span will completely span the entire stream bed and both banks of the stream.
Accordingly, the NCDOT does not feel that cross vane devices are necessary to provide
for stream stabilization. Division 5 personnel will monitor the site after construction to
ensure stream stability. If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Christopher A. Murray, P.W.S.
Environmental Officer
cc: Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT, Raleigh
John Kearney, NCDOT, Oxford
GOO
?? o\\ it
?. ? 662 -? \\
l
'6cQ I 1 I ?, cP
VO p
`(11 0
)ii ° FOP I \ L' 650 ,
VVV u
• u 1' s ? (?I p _ ? so, _/ . ,, i/ _ /rte -- -
111 ,:Cem
%
\Id 11 ' CAm 575 \ ?^
U 11 ?? ??C? I - 650
11
\\\\ /!• 680
? •4
\ II o ?/v 11: `?7 .' N \ \ 110
6,33
VVV l\
U s
it
11 - ..i I o\? // JO
BMi
Q 67. \ t
54
1101
it \I7L C6, \ _-
- I
6It
v 1
.? I\\\I -
49 1 \ 1-18
II \1 Jl o p/ 1100
J "_U p
-?II? ? ? ,? AAA ? ? . - 1 ?, i ?A ?? ? ? l c - ?11 ? i ? L?? ? I ? _ =v ??
700 ? ?
so i ? 1v??V ?ir I ,v I?,,???,-11• ?w v _?y •?J ? ? ,l _
i ?? ??/?- )' A I
1 ?l)
PTO CCt SItC
It I
n ?J)L 40
6 i
?L65`_???" ?1 ???•l?y -? A ? `?I i?l? I `?C? ??;_`I o f ?? I ???\ ? ?ti,? l ?,? ????I A,? ? I A??l?i r'i??? ??-?s?-_? \? ??_w
-/• ill ??? , ?.A?>A?•?a• ?4 t ?`? 1 1? ?( -s ?. »?
T, 7
ii I ? ??? / ? ?'``1`?l ? ,! ? I \ / /b / r i 1?,?J /?, ?? ?? \? ?? i - ? n rls ? ? ' 1
M/P
?? ? ?? ? Q ? l ? •???69 i ??1,??`?? ? )? V? C? /???' ? - il? ??I? ?I11? ? // ? ?? ? {!JJ(( ? (. /?? • i"v, ??? ?.?%/nb
-- r v =? / _/ I r 1,
r A ? r/ V im/ k,';?1 a f? 40
uJll
;??,? 1 -? 1 '; ?cam ?? `v. ? ?,/? ? ???1 r•
???' ?1 `? C y? ' f S r
71
1
\\ l
?j 9(
d i 1 V l !?? ?_ l I l n,/ FE
40
-'111! V a, r.- n.,f so
? yV p it ? '/° ?-. ii ? ? , d??- ?_ -__ _? ??' I ? ? .p i J'M'?
SHEET NUNNIBER 13
SOIL SURVEY OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROMI
WkD (Joins sheet 9)
w I ) m Pe m. WkB.•? EnC EnB - iL".?''en ,
WeD
0DDD ti0 C l WW3 Eel
', "l ?' t dw 1 1,' y,. 8 WkD w 1
A k
w
?6•' r 4 ?t ?. M' „ T Va13
,G v
i a? Y'i?'' f? + ° ,. !. NY 4"! y) :,r + ?F,•? +u ?,y? . 1 a l 6B
]too.
1 -? k+'+' n+,1G 9 ? A 1 ? ? AY? V 5 fl?'
?, 1 f!
e B He
rN r $ P Y+ q•?', ??
vi"
`.. ryµQ : 1Fr... 4"?jyJ';it 1 1fl, Project Site
%
'? 7R 1q,, x?? • ?,??y3Cyy77r:(??a?? r i y. ?; AR •. {. RYPr'„r
q,. '+w+'?1 Y ?'1!k a?? ?k + ?S
s1 S' r p y,L?,?. ?? hsr p e
•' 9 „S-Y
V { t TTT(((yyy lop
/p`' t.. al ' , e• it ?y
+f•?t1 ?''Tlt`"•}N 1.7 i 't t ??V". i. ?'.??1 '?•'-fi7•? •4L ;V,:.1
I.+•?. ? ? tit ? ? ?? l .. .
1 ? 'rTr
IF
v
r n 1N ?°.'.
.,a 1 +
h ?'`tir I', 'M`'Yn%{?.??t? rp• k4]AM.? _ It
•' _M?Rw?,. I .`;.? * ?'`+ y, - .).e ?".' ,:'S I fat', _
a fi; " K wk
I 'v
? r . 'Ju d
F`*i
WeD APC ApB 79°07'30
•
w 36'
?
3B
CeC
ApC Ce
?t
VaB
aC

t k A ,fit, t F ?r
1 01

yy W
'R??'fi ?I• r f
p.
1 1'rl ? J
??•°'h
Project Study Area
Bridge No. 40 on SR 1100
Person County
Person County Soil Survey
USDA-NRCS (1995)
Figure 2 1:24,000
z
w?
Q ?
QCc: ?
?o
W

N
L

L i-
N U
4-
L

V)

U E
O
4-- L
L

C
Cr C
D
-? - 0
Q
O ._ L
z c

NI

O ? I
W ? I
o ? I
o ? I
or
I
C I
ti
z
? z
? J
Q ?
J
Cl-
Q =
? O
?o
°
a.
o
N
Ln
°
r
"
•
a
k
? o U ,?

°;

? PRA
? R1gRE??
j Y
Q?w do
?- W Z
WWI ?
U)
?O
W f-
1
'I
I,
Gv
,Pl<, *.4
-?
1
QO,T, STA, F1+OC
,j PK NAIL

Ate....
xArt- TRag. To 15, 14-4 co
-w

Hydraulic Design and Analysis--
Plan and Profile
Replacement of Bridge No. 40 on
SR 1100 in Person County
Figure 4
1" = 50 feet (horiz.)/1"=10 foot (vert.)

Hydraulic Design and Analysis--
Bed Profile
Replacement of Bridge No. 40 on
SR 1100 in Person County
Figure 5
1" = 50 feet (horiz.)/1"=10 foot (vert.)
v
biz° 8 ?xre wrn?nc wn.we Huai«?
i Type HW/D H. W. do a0-L h,, I- H LSD
H. W.
9 2w

? i
i
F-
z

0 i r
U x• 3e I I
I r
I?

I \ ?
?ror•HC[wue ,M I
e ?
In
I
I
J i
J i \
LU i

lu>
o" W 15'
O R A N G E
1
N
0 0 0 N T Y
/?

Project Site
Replacement of Bridge No. 40 on
SR 1100 in Person County
NCDOT Person County Road Map
Figure 6 1" = 2 miles
z,
? i
1154T
!J 41
vs?
? te•6i
•-N - 11.
?? 9/1617 ??i

6 ei k
g <'e>Ib
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
May 9, 2002
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division Engineer
NCDOT, Division 5
2612 N. Duke Street
Durham, NC 27704
Re: Permit Application for proposed replacement of Bridge Number 40 on SR 1100 over the South Hyco
Creek in Person County
DWQ No. 020676
Dear Mr. Nance:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
The project as presently proposed calls for replacing a bridge with a culvert. The waters being
impacted are classified as WS II HQW. The application provides only a plan for the project. No
cross-section or stream profile information is provided. Given that the project plans to replace a bridge
with a con span structure, we need the requested information to assist in the determination that the
project will not result in a destabilization of the stream. In addition, please assess the potential for an
upstream and downstream cross vane to be constructed at the project site. Also, provide the proposed
design specifications for the cross vane installation. If you believe the requested design changes are
problematic, please provide additional information detailing the engineering rationale, and provide an
alternative design that provides for stream stability.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h .0507(a)(5), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite the processing of your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information, please contact John Hennessy at 919-733-5694.
Sincerely,
Joh R. Dorney V
Water Quality Certification Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
File Copy
C:\ncdot\SR 1100\correspondence\020676hld.doc
Wetlands/401 Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501/o recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
l V

STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
p [ 9
HV- 2mw
\ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 29, 2002
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality 2321 Crabtree Blvd. 020676
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
Attention: Mr. John Dorney
Coordinator
Subject: Proposed replacement of Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial
tributary to South Hyco Creek on SR 1100 in Person County. NCDOT
Work Order No. 5.3852008.
Reference: NCDOT permit application (April 29, 2002)
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to replace
Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek on SR 1100
in Person County. Construction of the project will necessitate impacts to waters of the
United States. Application was made for a Department of the Army Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and NWP 33 and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401
Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3375 and WQC No. 3366 by permit application
dated April 29, 2002.
An automated payment procedure has recently been implemented between the
NCDOT and NCDWQ. This procedure will enable the Division to apply for the 401
WQC without submitting a check for this permit application. This new procedure will
provide payment to the NCDWQ by charging the permit application fee directly to the
appropriate NCDOT work order.
The NCDOT work order for this proiect is 5,3852008. Proiect impacts are less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 linear feet
cumulative impacts to streams: therefore, please note that a fee of $200.00 is reauired for
this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
L C,PAYMEN
Christopher A. Murray, P. W. S. REC PAYMENT
Environmental Officer EiVED
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, SLOG. i
11
FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
II
C
Inrl. M
AC IO
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER i ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT;
COMMENTS:
02 06T61.
E
4

MAY- 2 200

ER? A?1 SECTION ?.... ,, ??
W t
j
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
April 29, 2002
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27609
Attention: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Coordinator
5 u _? ? U
MAY - 2 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
020676
Subject: Replacement of Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to
South Hyco Creek on SR 1100 in Person County. NCDOT State Project
No. 5.3852008.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) plans to replace
Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek in Person
County (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The existing three-span bridge (1@ 17'9", 1 @ 17', 1 @
17'9") was constructed in 1956 and has a timber floor on timber joist piles. This bridge
is currently in very poor condition; it is structurally deficient with a sufficiency rating of
36 out of 100 points. It has been determined that this structure must be replaced. The
proposed replacement structure is a 1 @ 28 feet x 6 feet con span with endwalls that is 60
feet long (Figure 2). Please note that the con span is a bottomless structure that is set on
concrete footings.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
Construction of the project involving replacement of the existing bridge will
necessitate impact to waters of the United States in the Roanoke River basin. Here the
project study area crosses an unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek and an
unnamed low flow intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek. These unnamed
tributaries to South Hyco Creek (DWQ Index No. 22-58-4-(0.5)) have a Best Usage
Classification of WS-II. High Quality Water Guidelines will be followed during project
construction.
Bridge Demolition and Removal
Bridge No. 40 has a timber floor covered with broken asphalt on timber joist
piles. The bridge will be removed under Case 3, where there are no special restrictions
Division 5, 2612 N. Duke Street, Durham, NC 27704
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
b
f v?_.D
beyond those outlined in Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and
Removal. The bridge construction site will be dewatered during construction, thus
precluding the dropping of bridge components into live water.
Bridge Replacement
Impacts will occur to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek at the project
site from the replacement of the existing bridge with a 1 @ 28 foot x 6 foot con span with
endwalls that is 60 feet long. Please note that the con span structure is a bottomless
structure set on concrete footings that will span the entire stream bed and both banks of
the stream. The existing bridge over the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek covers
21 linear feet of the stream. The con span will cover 60 linear feet of the stream.
Permanent impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from installation of the
con span structure will include 39 linear feet of stream cover.
Intermittent Stream Relocation
A portion of the very low flow intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is
located in the proposed fill area of the project (this low flow intermittent tributary is not
depicted on the Cedar Grove USGS topographic map (1967) or the Person County Soil
Survey (USDA-NRCS, 1995)). Accordingly, a portion of the intermittent tributary to
South Hyco Creek must be relocated outside of the proposed construction fill limits. A
total of 27 linear feet of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek will be relocated
in a rip rap lined channel (rip rap along bank slopes only to provide stabilization) with 2:1
side slopes that is 27 feet in length. This rip rap-is utilized here only to maintain the
physical integrity of the low flow intermittent tributary. The stream bottom will consist
of natural substrate. This activity will result in 27 feet existing channel impacted. Please
note that the NCDOT does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any
type of on-site mitigation.
Dewatering
The NCDOT will dewater the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek during the
construction of the project. This will involve the placement of sheet piling in the stream
channel approximately 10 feet upstream of the proposed con span endwall and
approximately 10 feet downstream of the proposed con span endwall. To maintain water
flow during construction, water upstream of this impervious structure will be temporarily
pumped out and conveyed downstream of the structure. The stream will be dewatered
less than three weeks. This will result in temporary impacts to the surface water.
Temporary impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from this activity
will result in the dewatering of 0.02 ac of stream bed and 80 linear feet stream channel.
The sheet piling will be removed after construction.
Waters of the U.S. Mitigation
Avoidance: All wetlands or surface waters not affected by the project will be
protected from unnecessary encroachment. No staging of construction equipment or
storage of construction supplies will be allowed in or near wetlands or surface waters.
Minimization:
• The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional sites.
• The project will impact tributaries to South Hyco Creek (Best Usage Classification
WS-II). Sedimentation and erosion control High Quality Water Guidelines will be
strictly enforced during project construction.
• FIRST PLAN DESIGN (March 2, 2001)
The first plan design for this project involved the replacement of the existing bridge
with a 1 @ 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that is 65 feet long.
Permanent impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from the
replacement of the existing bridge with the corrugated steel pipe arch (with a
headwall at the inlet and rip rap to protect the structure) include 110 feet existing
channel impacted and 0.02 acre fill in surface water. Temporary impacts to the
perennial stream from dewatering will result in the dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream
bed and 85 linear feet of stream channel.
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is located in the proposed
fill area of the first plan design. The plan design indicates that 75 linear feet of the
intermittent tributary would be relocated in a rip rap lined channel with a two foot
base that is 70 feet in length. This activity will result in 75 feet existing channel
impacted.
• SECOND PLAN DESIGN (November 30, 2001)
An on-site meetinp- was held with the County Bridge Supervisor on November 30
2001 to discuss the project and evaluate minimization opportunities at the project It
was determined that the amount of rip rap could be minimized at the inlet and outlet
of the proposed 1 @ 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch. Additionally,
impacts to the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek could be minimized by
reducing the len tg h of the tributary that would have to be filled during construction of
the site.
The second plan design for this project still involved the replacement of the existing
bridge with a 1 @ 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that is 65 feet long.
Permanent impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from the
replacement of the existing bridge with the corrugated steel pipe arch (with a
headwall at the inlet and reduced minimal amounts of rip rap to protect the structure)
include 85 feet existing channel impacted and 0.02 acre fill in surface water.
Temporary impacts to the perennial stream from dewatering will result in the
dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream bed and 85 linear feet of stream channel.
4
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is still located in the
proposed fill area of the second plan design. The revised plan design indicates that 27
linear feet of the intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap lined channel (rip
ran along bank slopes only to provide stabilization) with 2:1 side slopes that is 27 feet
in length. This activity will result in 27 feet existing channel impacted. Please note
that the NCDOT does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any
type of on-site mitigation.
THIRD (AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED) PLAN DESIGN (March 22, 2002)
The plan design for this project was sent back to NCDOT Hydraulics Unit in early
spring 2002 to further assess minimization opportunities on site. It was determined
that the proposed structure associated with the perennial tributary to South Hyco
Creek would be revised from a lea 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that
is 65 feet in length to a 1 @.28 foot x 6 foot con span with endwalls that is 60 feet in
length Please note that the con span structure is a bottomless structure set on
concrete footings that will span the entire stream bed and both banks of the stream.
The third plan design for this project involves the replacement of the existing bridge
with a 1 @ 28 foot x 6 foot con span with endwalls. The existing bridge over the
perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek covers 21 linear feet of the perennial
tributary to South Hyco Creek. The con span will cover 60 linear feet of the
perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek. Permanent impacts to the perennial
tributary to South Hyco Creek will include 39 linear feet of stream cover.
Temporary impacts to the perennial stream from dewatering will result in the
dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream bed and 80 linear feet of stream channel.
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is still located in the
proposed fill area of the first plan design. The revised third plan design still indicates
that 27 linear feet of the intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap lined
channel (rip rap along bank slopes only to provide stabilization) with 2:1 side slopes
that is 27 feet in length. The stream bottom will consist of natural substrate. This
activity will result in 27 feet existing channel impacted. Please note that the NCDOT
does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any type of on-site
mitigation.
• Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the Environmental
Officer during construction to minimize impacts to these sites. The amount of rip rap
placed along the relocated intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek has been
reduced to the amount that is only necessary to provide for adequate streambank
stabilization (based on what can be determined at this time). All efforts will be made
during construction to reduce this amount of rip rap at the outlet side.
Compensatory Mitigation: Construction of the project will result in only minimal
impacts to waters of the United States. Impacts have been minimized to the maximum
extent possible during the design process. Due to minimal impacts and minimization
cfforts outlined above, compensatory mitigation for impacts to waters of the United
States will not be provided for this project.
Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened,
Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section
7 and Section 9 of the ESA. As of February 7, 2001, there are no federally-protected
species listed for Person County. A mussel survey was conducted at the site during a site
visit on November 30, 2001. No mussels, clams or snails were observed during the site
visit.
Historical Compliance
Historic compliance work to be scheduled and concurrence with Historic
Preservation Office will be obtained if required.
Summary
NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed perennial tributary
to South Hyco Creek in Person County. The proposed replacement structure is a 1 @ 28
foot x 6 foot con span. Impacts to waters of the United States from project construction
include:
Impacts will occur to the perennial tributary at the project from the replacement of the
existing bridge with a 1 @ 28 foot x 6 foot con span with and endwall that is 60 feet
in length. Please note that the con span structure is a bottomless structure set on
concrete footings that will span the entire stream bed and both banks of the stream.
The existing bridge over the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek covers 21 linear
feet of the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek. The con span will cover 60
linear feet of the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek. Permanent impacts to the
perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek will include 39 linear feet of stream cover.
Temporary impacts to the perenial stream from dewatering will result in the
dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream bed and 80 linear feet of stream channel.
• A portion of the unnamed intermittent tributary is located in the proposed fill area of
the project. Accordingly, 27 linear feet of the intermittent tributary will be relocated
in a rip rap lined channel (rip rap along bank slopes only to provide stabilization) with
2:1 side slopes that is 27 feet in length. The stream bottom will consist of natural
substrate. This activity will result in 27 feet existing channel impacted. Please note
that the NCDOT does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any
type of on-site mitigation.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Section 404
Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 and NWP 33 and NCDENR-DWQ Section 401 Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3375 and No. 3366 for construction of this project.
The NCDOT will comply with all applicable NWP and WQC conditions. A pre-
construction notification is attached with this request. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Cbristopher A. Murray, P.W.S.
Environmental Officer
cc: Mr. John Dorney, NCDWQ, Raleigh
Mr. Dallie Bagwell, NCDOT Bridge Superintendent, Raleigh
Mr. John Kearney, NCDOT Bridge Maintenance Supervisor, Oxford
4.4 lI \\ coo _'`? ` '\ 11 I ?? ?\?`? "?\ -_? ?\
1 2'- ?' °"? as
62
less
II /r v'..l 1
°o \ r
fill
1:8 \
/\1 l)u 11 -? oP
U II 6.- / -
it CCm U 575 10
650, -
g
690 It
110
VVV n P - 6.33
J a
'I
BI • 11 .
\ I M I
67 It
11717 5 ?. 101
X00
6-973
if ft
49 u u 1 18 - o c ?\ \ _ ii
f f
II \?? ? \ji
41
it )?;? n a ?? ???? ? l? ?-mil %0? )// ?.A\ ? 1??. ? 7i': ? v'?'? ? ? -? . i?i ? ? ???I ?????i wel•
1 rl l ()? \ ( f ?i
Project Sitel/
r ?\?_ • ?? 4??? \. i I 1 I, I / ? L /
r
x-') JS ? / v )_ )v , A. ?? ?? (/// ! ? ' I A\,A,l ? ??? AN / 'C ? ?' • ? `" 5p g /i :' 1, , - ,1 / ,.a ?
;rr" .?/. =il ?lr'1 --??? ??.1 /i- ',? l?? ?` 1(? \ l I I ? ? /' ? ?. ?- ! i ?? .\ I• / ? ''?('-/ ? ?.? ?, .r1(l I t i //.
yj N f h ' ArL \ 1 /
5
_j It
i
q
s ?
~ \C \t\ \
/Ml
11 -
?'il
0,
lit
?? II I_ ? ? ? ? /??• I?Ulli
r ?\

Of -
41)
? ? ? , e?Fwke ?1
313 ? ?>??/ ??-'
PAN 40
Project Study Area
Bridge No. 40 on SR 1100
Person County
Cedar Grove USGS Topo Map (1967) 71
v
1:24,000

9(
FE
40
SHEET NUtiIBER 13
SOIL SURVEY OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH ' CAROLIT
W kD (Joins sheet 9)
Myr:. r I 'r.. y m m WkB EnB' Y 6,&
s hs ?l ee EnC if
}' at ?QWeD WkB L1A
? •° i ?? r Q Cw n n8. "
t ! f t br 1 ti7: hl. WkD #
f
'+ e? " lA r S y,<La y °':e 1 ly d O k8
??'R''. ? 'i.??r Asa. ? ? ?s q?,? ? ?. r? kf ?f ?' ,?.x ?... ? ,F . (? ?f •e?' y, I (yC
iN lNn?. S V
f 1. t MM d Val` aG 4 ', Wk cI
Otto ,. WkFr ??., O?, P Wel
y., He He L9 ,ir y k
I n t t t '^n ?#. f 7?`.2 urebl {}
JM•,RS^+1,,?
} }
f j.y1, Project Site
7 N ' tr - p
JAI
rYN",l'? ? tr n 1 r ,i .? ?;. b h ra 4 ? M ? rf P K
tY+?14??: » AM7S'? s®t'?; rv! it 7r, r "?i:F ?'?
'0'
e
?V1 y 1 11f f Y !r.' ? +',? ' YV 9 Y t?]?^r?'t r r t q ,y?,*. w 9( x? ?~•??Y'?P "1 w9µ.
: w F
it:
,?k d ? ? ?? rY t?n•I I ? f 4`r
C i
26.
Y A,r (s `?7' .1 ?? iY?ar«1'
M. j
lp,
' '1'fk '' r• r'"ry f l 1 y IF 'v
f4 N,
M ,{ty g ... M ?4y 9?Cj'
I.", iow
w 4m1` `SW Gfr r. 4?"a,'i {I. . r?
r. r o ?+« J , ? J1 n w Y.,e ti, ]R Y
WeD APC ApB 79°07'30"
36s
W.
0 ^ 1. t1
APC C"% ,.
VaB
VaC r
9qe G G r
'.'pY+?; ? rY
a
.t
r
'+' f !
FN

i ,4? cwt
t n?

r?r 4 1 v

?i
t 4
A? ? N

Project Study Area
Bridge No. 40 on SR 1100
Person County
Person County Soil Survey
USDA-NRCS (1995)
Figure 2 1:24,000
N
L
L +
? U
° L
4-
N
O
z
z
? J
Q?
?z
Q?
CL- o
w

N
U E
° O
4- L
L
CL cn
° c
(Y c -
a - °

O W
W ?
cl- v
O ?
0- U)
z
Lid z
v ?
Q Cl-
Q z
CL O
+r
?o
°
a

p ? ? N

?oU
d' p
O 0
Yza' M
.d w

? PRA
?' PAR S•\?
jY
z m W
Q: Q:
Q I? W I- O
O W Z
W W ? ?
Cr-
\1 \
'I
I.

?0? A ,?
> --i
Ga _ ?
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
For Section 404 and/or Section 10 Nationwide, Regional and General Permits, Section 401
General Water Quality Certifications, and Riparian Buffer and Watershed Buffer Rules
This form is to be used for projects qualifying for any of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE)
Nationwide, Regional or General Permits as required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, and for the North Carolina Division of Water Quality's
(DWQ) associated General 401 Water Quality Certifications. This form is also to be used for any
project requiring approval under any Riparian Buffer Rules implemented by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality. This form should not be used if you are requesting an Individual 404 Permit or Individual 401
Water Quality Certification. The USACE Individual Permit application form is available online at
http sa' v kisace_army_.mil/wetlands/Per n_??avo.litnl.
The USACE is the lead regulatory agency. To review the requirements for the use of Nationwide,
Regional or General permits, and to determine which permit applies to your project, please go to the
USACE website at littr)://www..saw.usace.at-n y miI/wetlands/re(,tour._Iittii, or contact one of the field
offices listed at the end of this application. The website also lists the responsible project manager for
each county in North Carolina and provides additional information regarding the identification and
regulation of wetlands and waters of the U. S.
The DWQ issues a corresponding Certification (General or Individual), and cannot tell the applicant
which 401 Certification will apply until the 404 Permit type has been determined by the USACE.
Applicants are encouraged to visit DWQ's 401/Wetlands Unit website at
lit to /1h2o etir ,state.nc.us/nc,,Vetlands to read about current requirements for the 401 Water Quality
Certification Program and to determine whether or not Riparian Buffer Rules are applicable. The
applicant is also advised to read the full text of the General Certification (GC) matching the specific 404
Permit requested. In some cases, written approval for some General Certifications is not required,
provided that the applicant adheres to all conditions of the GC. Applicants lacking access to the internet
should contact DWQ's Central Office in Raleigh at [phone].
Trout Waters Coordination - Special coordination with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission (NCWRC) is also required for projects occurring in any of North Carolina's twenty-five
counties that contain trout waters. In such cases, the applicant should contact the appropriate NCWRC
regional coordinator (listed by county on the last page of this application).
Page 1 of 13
CAINIA Coordination - If the project occurs in 'any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on
the last page of this application) the applicant should also contact the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (DCM) at [phone]. DCM will determine whether or not the project involves a
designated Area of Environmental Concern, in which case DCM will act as the lead permitting agency.
In such cases, DCM will require a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Permit and will coordinate
the 404/401 Permits.
USACE Permits - Submit one copy of this form, along with supporting narratives, maps, data forms,
photos, etc. to the applicable USACE Regulatory Field Office (addresses are listed at the end of this
application). Upon receipt of an application, the USACE will determine if the application is complete as
soon as possible, not to exceed 30 days. This PCN form is designed for the convenience of the applicant
to address information needs for all USACE Nationwide, Regional or General permits, as well as
information required for State authorizations, certifications, and coordination. Fully providing the
information requested on this form will result in a complete application for any of the USACE
Nationwide, Regional or General permits. To review the minimum amount of information that must be
provided for a complete PCN for each USACE Nationwide permit, see Condition 13, 65 Fed.Reg. 12893
(March 9, 2000), available at litth //vvk?_w saw.t.isace.arni niilik-\,ctlailds/riwpt_iiiall ed(Zeg pdt.
Processing times vary by permit and begin once the application has been determined to be complete.
Please contact the appropriate regulatory field office for specific answers to permit processing periods.
401 Water Quality Certification or Buffer Rules - All information is required unless otherwise stated
as optional. Incomplete applications will be returned. Submit seven collated copies of all USACE
Permit materials to the Division of Water Quality, 401/Wetlands Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650. If written approval is required or specifically requested for a 401
Certification, then a non-refundable application fee is required. In brief, if project impacts include less
than one acre of cumulative wetland/water impacts and less than 150 feet cumulative impacts to
streams, then a fee of $200 is required. If either of these thresholds is exceeded, then a fee of $475 is
required. A check made out to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality, with the specific name of
the project or applicant identified, should be stapled to the front of the application package. For more
information, see the DWQ website at lit tp "/h2o ehtir s-t-ate ,iic us;ncNvet14nds/_t'eeti lit ml. The fee must be
attached with the application unless the applicant is a federal agency in which case the check may be
issued from a separate office. In such cases, the project must be identifiable on the U.S. Treasury check
so that it can be credited to the appropriate project. If written approval is sought solely for Buffer Rules,
the application fee does not apply, and the applicant should clearly state (in a cover letter) that only
Buffer Rule approval is sought in writing. Wetlands or waters of the U.S. may not be impacted prior to
issuance or waiver of a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Upon receipt of a complete application
for a 401 Certification, the Division of Water Quality has 60 days to prepare a written response to the
applicant. This may include a 401 Certification, an on-hold letter pending receipt of additional
requested information, or denial.
Page 2 of 13
Office Use Only: 02 . 0676 Form Version April 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
I . Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 and NWP 33
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: NCDOT/Christopher A. Murray
Mailing Address: 2612 N Duke Street Durham NC 27704
Telephone Number: (.919) 560-6081 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
Page 3 of 13
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge No. 40 over an unnamed tributary to South Hyco Creek on SR
1100 in Person County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or Work Order: Work Order No. 5.3852008
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Person Nearest Town: Hurdle Mills
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): From Durham travel north on
NC 157 to Hurdle Mills in Person County. In Hurdle Mills, turn and travel west on SR 1107
Continue traveling, on SR 1107 which is renamed SR 1100 when you travel past SR 1102
Turn right and travel west on SR 1100 to project study area.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): 17 666892E 4012260N UTM
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application: Site is
surrounded by a mixture of wooded land and agricultural land.
7. Property size (acres): Project footprint is 100 feet long, and 90 wide. Property size is
approximately 0.2 acre.
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Unnamed perennial tributary to
South Hyco Creek and unnamed intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek
9. River Basin: Roanoke River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http: / 120.etu-.st,':l te nc.us/JdI)-ial,'ma1)s/.)
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Replacement of Bridge No. 40 over an
unnamed perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek on SR 1100 in Person County. The
replacement structure is 1 @ 28 feet x 6 feet con span structure. Additionally, an unnamed
intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is located in the project study area A portion of
Page 4 of 13
this unnamed intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap lined channel (rip rap along
bank slopes only for stabilization). The stream bed will consist of natural substrate.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: Excavator, crane,
backhoe and bulldozer.
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Wooded land and agricultural land
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
No previous project jurisdictional determination or permit history associated with site.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any additional permit requests anticipated for this project in the future? If so, describe the
anticipated work, and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current
application: None anticipated
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact Type of Area of Located within Distance to
Site Number * Impact 100-year Floodplain** Nearest Stream Type of Wetland***
(indicate on maul Impact* (acres) (yes/no) linear feet
* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Page 5 of 13
100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FF.MA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at
•"' List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0 acre
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact Average Width of Perennial or
Site Number
indicate on
(
Type of Impact* Length of Impact

(linear feet) **
Stream Name**
Stream Before Intermittent?

(please
map) Impact specify)
Site 1 Placement of con span at perennial (60 UT S. Hyco Creek 11 feet Perennial
tributary _

Site 1 Temporary Dewatering of
80
UT S. Hyco Creek
11 feet
Perennial
perennial tributary
site 1 see note below Stream loss (fill) at filled
intermittent tributary

UT S. Hyco Creek

2 feet

Intermittent
Stream gain at rip rap-lined +27
Site 1 "°° note below relocated intermittent tributary brut (not for on-site UT S. Hyco Creek 2 feet Intermittent
not count for on-site mitigation) mitigation)
Note: A portion of the intermittent tributary is located in the Proposed fill I of the project. Accordingly, 27 linear feet of the
intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap-lined channel (rip rap along bank slopes only to provide stabilization) with 2.1 side
slopes that is 27 feet in length. The stream bottom will consist of natural substrate. There is no net loss or gain of intermitt
ent
tributary stream channel: however, please note that the NCDOT does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any
type of on-site mitigation. See cumulative impacts to streams below.
" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net losstgain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
1!0%. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., \\\,\,\\ k f o/o1iC, cup,
_in,t gkic,;t (:oni, etc.). _
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site:
Perennial Tributary to South Hyco Creek:
Permanent Impact: The existing bridge covers 21 linear feet of stream channel and the
proposed con span structure covers 60 linear feet of stream channel. Permanent impacts to
the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from the installation of the con span structure
include 39 linear feet of stream cover (60 linear feet minus 21 linear feet).
Temporary Impact: Temporary pacts from dewatering the perennial tributary to South
Hyco Creek include 80 linear feet stream channel.
Intermittent Tributary to South Hyco Creek:
Permanent Impact: A total of 27 linear feet will be relocated in a rip rap lined channel that is
27 linear feet in lentth. The stream bottom will consist of natural substrate. This activity
will result in the filling of 27 linear_ feet of stream channel. The relocated channel does not
rovide any type of on-site mitigation
Page 6 of 13
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact Area of Name of Waterbod
y Type of Waterbody
Site Number Type of Impact* Impact (if applicable) (lake, pond, estuary, sound,
indicate on ma acres bay, ocean, etc.

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
• The side slopes have been steepened to the extent possible at jurisdictional sites.
• The project will impact tributaries to South Hyco Creek (Best Usage Classification WS-II).
Sedimentation and erosion control High Quality Water Guidelines will be strictly enforced during
project construction.
• FIRST PLAN DESIGN (March 2, 2001)
The first plan design for this project involved the replacement of the existing bridge with a 1
@ 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that is 65 feet long. Permanent impacts to
the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from the replacement of the existing bridge with
the corrugated steel pipe arch (with a headwall at the inlet and rip rap to protect the structure)
include 110 feet existing channel impacted and 0.02 acre fill in surface water. Temporary
impacts to the perennial stream from dewatering will result in the dewatering of 0.02 acre of
stream bed and 85 linear feet of stream channel.
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is located in the proposed fill area
of the first plan design. The plan design indicates that 75 linear feet of the intermittent
tributary would be relocated in a rip rap lined channel with a two foot base that is 70 feet in
length. This activity will result in 75 feet existing channel impacted.
Page 7 of 13
SECOND PLAN DESIGN (November 30, 2001)
An on-site meeting was held with the County Bridge Supervisor on November 30, 2001 to
discuss the project and evaluate minimization opportunities at the project. It was determined
that the amount of rip rap could be minimized at the inlet and outlet of the proposed 1 k 142
inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch. Additionally, impacts to the intermittent tributary
to South Hyco Creek could be minimized by reducing the length of the tributary that would
have to be filled during construction of the site.
The second plan design for this project still involved the replacement of the existing bridge
with a 1 @ 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that is 65 feet long. Permanent
impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek from the replacement of the existing
bridge with the corrugated steel pipe arch (with a headwall at the inlet and reduced minimal
amounts of rip rap to protect the structure) include 85 feet existing channel impacted and
0.02 acre fill in surface water. Temporary impacts to the perennial stream from dewatering
will result in the dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream bed and 85 linear feet of stream channel.
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is still located in the proposed fill
area of the second plan design. The revised plan design indicates that 27 linear feet of the
intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap lined channel (rip rap along bank slopes
only to provide stabilization) with 2:1 side slopes that is 27 feet in length. This activity will
result in 27 feet existing channel impacted. Please note that the NCDOT does not consider
the relocated intermittent tributary to provide any type of on-site mitigation.
THIRD (AND CURRENTLY PROPOSED) PLAN DESIGN (March 22, 2002)
The plan design for this project was sent back to NCDOT Hydraulics Unit in early spring
2002 to further assess minimization opportunities on site. It was determined that the
proposed structure associated with the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek would be
revised from a 1 @a, 142 inch x 91 inch corrugated steel pipe arch that is 65 feet in length to a
I @ 28 foot x 6 foot con span with endwalls that is 60 feet in length. Please note that the con
span structure is a bottomless structure set on concrete footings that will span the entire
stream bed and both banks of the stream.
The third plan design for this project involves the replacement of the existing bridge with a 1
@ 28 foot x 6 foot con span with endwalls. The existing bridge over the perennial tributary
to South Hyco Creek covers 21 linear feet of the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek.
The con span will cover 60 linear feet of the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek.
Permanent impacts to the perennial tributary to South Hyco Creek will include 39 linear feet
of stream cover. Temporary impacts to the perennial stream from dewatering will result in
the dewatering of 0.02 acre of stream bed and 80 linear feet of stream channel.
A portion of the intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek is still located in the proposed fill
area of the first plan design. The revised third plan design still indicates that 27 linear feet of
the intermittent tributary will be relocated in a rip rap lined channel (rip rap along, bank
slopes only to provide stabilization) with 2:1 side slopes that is 27 feet in length. The stream
bottom will consist of natural substrate. This activity will result in 27 feet existing channel
Page 8 of 13
impacted. Please note that the NCDOT does not consider the relocated intermittent tributary
to provide any type of on-site mitigation.
Continued coordination will occur with maintenance forces and the Environmental Officer during
construction to minimize impacts to these sites. The amount of rip rap placed along the relocated
intermittent tributary to South Hyco Creek has been reduced to the amount that is only necessary to
provide for adequate streambank stabilization (based on what can be determined at this time). All
efforts will be made during construction to reduce this amount of rip rap at the outlet side.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
htt1? _//h2o.enr._ state. M.Ls/ncwetlands/strtmdde_iitnil.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Not Applicable
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
Page 9 of 13
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at w .; +.; , If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Page 10 of 13
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mid lion
1 3
2 1.5
Total
` Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank oI c[tannel; Lone .L extmas an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0260.
Not Applicable
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existing: 0.05 acre impervious surface of 0.2 acre total project size.
Proposed: 0.05 acre impervious surface of 0.2 acre total project size.
High Quality Water Guidelines and other erosion control measures will be placed in a manner to
preclude sediment from leaving the site Temporary erosion control measures may include
temporary silt fence temporary silt ditch, temporary rock silt check (Type A). temporary rock
silt check Type Bl and temporary rock sediment dam (Type B) All temporarily disturbed areas
will be revegetated immediately after construction
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The protect will not generate wastewater.
XM. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H,0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 11 of 13
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional).
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
0:?
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
US Army Corps Of Engineers Field Offices and County Coverage
Asheville Regulatory Field Office Alexander Cherokee Iredell Mitchell
US Army Corps of Engineers Avery Clay Jackson Polk
151 Patton Avenue Buncombe Cleveland Lincoln Rowan
Room 208 Burke Gaston Macon Rutherford
Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Cabarrus Graham Madison Stanley
Telephone: [phone] Caldwell Haywood McDowell Swain
Fax: [phone] Catawba Henderson Mecklenburg Transylvania
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Alamance Durham Johnston Rockingham
US Army Corps Of Engineers Alleghany Edgecombe Lee Stokes
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road Ashe Franklin Nash Surry
Suite 120 Caswell Forsyth Northampton Vance
Raleigh, NC 27615 Chatham Granville Orange Wake
Telephone: [phone] Davidson Guilford Person Warren
Fax: [phone] Davie Halifax Randolph Wilkes
Washington Regulatory Field Office Beaufort Currituck Jones
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bertie Dare Lenoir
Post Office Box 1000 Camden Gates Martin
Washington, NC 27889-1000 Carteret* Green Pamlico
Telephone: [phone] Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
Fax: [phone] Craven Hyde Perquimans
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office Anson Duplin Onslow
US Army Corps Of Engineers Bladen Harnett Pender
Post Office Box 1890 Brunswick Hoke Richmond
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Carteret Montgomery Robeson
Telephone: [phone] Columbus Moore Sampson
Fax: [phone] Cumberland New Hanover Scotland
Pitt
Tyrrell
Washington
Wayne
Union
Watauga
Yancey
Wilson
Yadkin
*Croatan National Forest Only
Page 12 of 13
US Fis
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone: [phone]
h and Wildlife Service / National M
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone: [phone]
[arine Fisheries Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
Habitat Conservation Division
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone: [phone]
North Carolina State Agencies
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Water Quality
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CAMA and NC Coastal Counties
State Historic Preservation Office
Department Of Cultural Resources
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Division of Coastal Management Beaufort Chowan Hertford Pasquotank
1638 Mail Service Center Bertie Craven Hyde Pender
Raleigh, NC 27699-1638 Brunswick Currituck New Hanover Perquimans
Telephone: [phone] Camden Dare Onslow Tyrrell
Fax: [phone] Carteret Gates Pamlico Washington
NCWRC and NC Trout Counties
Western Piedmont Region Coordinator Alleghany Caldwell Watauga
3855 Idlewild Road Ashe Mitchell Wilkes
Kemersville, NC 27284-9180 Avery Stokes
Telephone: [phone] Burke Surry
Mountain Region Coordinator Buncombe Henderson Polk
20830 Great Smoky Mtn. Expressway Cherokee Jackson Rutherford
Waynesville, NC 28786 Clay Macon Swain
Telephone: [phone] Graham Madison Transylvania
Fax: [phone] Haywood McDowell Yancey
Page 13 of 13