310557_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200721

UDivision of Water Resources j gel S -
Facility Number ®- ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
s 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Co pHance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7- I -Wd Arrival Time: 111 Uo_ajDeparture Time: County: ` L j?4 Region: IN fly e)
Farm Name:
CIp
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
( , h a L,)
�l^ i �1 i As
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:,ac5
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: as-7) V
Certification Number-- 'l 1 S-� 1-avao
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current.
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity, Pop.
Layer
Li '?3 Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity POD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: I I - '55 Date of Inspection: -7—a l �oaO
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): —lam "
Observed Freeboard (in): k �—
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
r❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes E?�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes E?6No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes jj/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
/No
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes LVJ 1
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
;No
❑ Yes N
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents �/
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YesVNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 - j Date of Inspection: 3--.Pl— DPa
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Vd ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 'eNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [V /NE
❑ Yes [ (o
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
'J��Cuje- W=-.O�ly �Jocj'-I'n) An 6C+0,11 IT, ReIrds 1- (0- (_ a1117
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .i o4)W rt; ".y Phone: (I ► of) L 17 ` 1 S7-7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015