Bu. Co. Violations

County of Buncombe /�Al
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
46 Valley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Jon E. Creighton, Director/
Assistant County Manager
April 19, 2005
Roger Edwards
Surface Water Protection, Regional Supervisor
North Carolina DENR-Division of Water Quality
2090 U.S Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Dear Mr. Edwards:
Re. NOV-2005-DV-0015
Planning/ Zoning [phone]
Erosion Control [phone]
E911 Addressing [phone]
Fax [phone]
lJ f
APR 2 0 2005 I
1
W JER QUALITY SECTION
ASHEVIL.LE REGIONAL OFFICE
Buncombe County's Sports Park located along Sand Hill Road in Buncombe County
recently received a Notice of Violation from your office. The violation was the
unpermitted discharge of commercial wastewater. The violation involved washing field -
painting equipment over a storm drain in front of the maintenance facility of the sports
park. The drain feeds into a small stream, leading to Hominy Creek.
On behalf of Buncombe County Recreation Services, I contacted Larry Frost with DENR
regarding washing this type of equipment at a facility that feeds into a sewer system. He
indicated via voice mail that this would be acceptable to DWQ; the concern was the
runoff being discharged untreated. I also contacted the company that supplies the County
with the field paint. I have received a material safety data sheet, indicating that the field
paint is latex. I contacted the County's Hazard Waste Officer Denese Ballew regarding
correct procedures to wash equipment used to spray this type of paint. Commercial
carwashes would be acceptable, since the ran -off goes into a drain with a catch basin for
solids, and a tank for the oil water separator. Also, a place to wash the equipment leading
to the sanitary sewer is acceptable, as long as MSD is advised.
The Buncombe County Sports Park will no longer clean the field painting equipment on
site. Equipment will be transported to either a commercial carwash, or to a place where
runoff will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system.
If further action is required, please let me know.
Sincerely,
C thia Fox Barcklow, AICP
Planner III
cc: Annette Wise, Buncombe County Recreation Services
Denese Ballew, Buncombe County Solid Waste

Mill,Easley Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION
April 13, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Annette Wise, Director
Buncombe County Parks and Recreation Department
72 Gashes Creek Road
Asheville, North Carolina 28805
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2005-DV-0015
Un-permitted Discharge
Buncombe County Sports Park
Sand Hill Road
Buncombe County
Dear Ms. Wise:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
An investigation by this Office, on March 29, 2005, has concluded that your employees at the
Buncombe County Sports Park off of Sand Hill Road discharged commercial wastewater to
jurisdictional waters of the State. The wastewater discharge was the result of washing field -painting
equipment over a storm drain in front of the maintenance facility. The drain feeds the adjacent
stream, a tributary to Hominy Creek.
The following violation has been discovered:
• The unpermitted discharge of commercial wastewater constitutes a violation of North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1.
Each violation is enforceable under provisions of NCGS 143-215.6A as administered by this
Agency. Furthermore, a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 may be assessed for each violation.
In order to avoid further regulatory action you are requested to respond in writing within ten
(10) working days of receipt of this letter with information regarding;
• The immediate halt to all unpermitted discharges.
• Your plans to prevent future discharges. Northcarolina
Xaturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.ennstate.no.us FAX [phone]
'' An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

R
Ms. Wise
April 13, 2005
Page 2
Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Larry Frost at (828)
296-4500.
Sincerely,
oger Edwards
Surface Water Protection, Regional Supervisor

W ATF�QG
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department Environment Natural Resources
o�0F
of and
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
—�
Division of Water Quality
0 'C
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Mr. Ken Castello
Buncombe County Health Department
35 Woodfin Drive
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
O A—l'IIA3HSV
C�hC3"w2;� S3�lS� ZL
Vc
1..l.Psl17UJ 3i�ENU:;�!!18
?1C.;1S3?00 '2SYVk 3 i.i3NNV
ueuuervt� 'pL .<,�;L�,LI�,t-1 �. r•, i.�;o� �
PLC'L1GLUL1011AU_IVwv
L'UiIO� L!}101�
-- ----mom m
`C6TT E652 0000 05�.0 +100L
-�^�^�su-bsurtace disposal s�
September 18, 2003
Subject: Wastewater Disposal for Single Family
Residences
Alternatives and Options
Buncombe County
e North Carolina Division of Water Quality has received a large
charge wastewater generated at single family residences that
and distribution field as an option. In order for the Division of
JCAC 2H .0105 (c) (3), all other wastewater treatment and
ed prior to considering a discharge option. For any of your
discharge wastewater, please advise them that the following
unity sewer availability (municipal or other) for the proposed
ncombe County Health Department stating that a traditional
Id are not acceptable for a given site.
t ; --a
NC State Department of Environmental Health (or its
In alternative type of onsite (including subsurface irrigation),
%stem is not permittable.
• A letter from a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist which states there is no available
surface disposal (spray irrigation or drip irrigation of treated wastewater) alternative available.
(Must be stamped and signed with his / her professional seal.)
ROil
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Castello
September 18, 2003
Page 2
• A justification from the applicant that no adjacent or additional property is available for any
of the above types of disposal system. This should be both a financial justification and an
environmental justification including the above criteria.
Lastly, any submitted application must include a wastewater system design, which will
adequately handle the proposed waste to be generated from the planned residence. As newly
constructed wastewater treatment and disposal systems must include a septic tank, primary and
secondary (or re -circulating) sand filters, disinfection, and post aeration apparatus. The proposed
applicant must obtain the services of a North Carolina Licensed Professional Engineer to design and
supervise the installation of the subject wastewater treatment system. The submitted application
must include plans and specifications for the proposed wastewater treatment system and must be
signed and sealed by the above mentioned Professional Engineer.
As the Division of Water Quality considers any form of discharge to be the least desirable
option, the Asheville Regional Office will only consider an application which includes all of the above
listed materials. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-251-
6208.
Sincerely,
Frost
mmental Chemist
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. i nature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse �-A
so that we can return the card to you. B. Receiv by (Printed Name) C. Date
Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
__ nr_.nn_fhe_frnnf if_cn�no_r..uemifn --- • -----
«, C ;.•;,' s r er'$ ent item 11 ❑
l�ur;;r .i
^_�,` ° En.!rn,-trt• i �r,a fd�.;ara 1=.eso.nr: ,livery-addr elow: �7
pZ ri
LL
U U O
_
W CQ
. .r_�..r... .... --—.-_=r......-._.._-.:.ry--�-.-.•->�. _,•c..:+:r,.acov<._:._ _�,�....:.:ra�:..a..= n 7
(s i [ - F. �) i '- �:7 :�+;
Service Type
N�
cal
0
¢ LU
,
11_. •;- •
XCertified
❑ Registeret
all
Express Mail
ReQrn6 Recei
qo
erch
_ .1, _ _. ; ,i c �;
❑ Insured Mail
.0:6
—
`2 .,,.S r_I - -' i ` - -'� —ROAD
Restricted D
IE
(Extra Fee)
� c
Yes
E i
(transfer from service label)
7004 0750 93 11
'S Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-o t54

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No. G-10
Not •h' LarciinB Dop,,;-i1nentgf
y {- a �-n.irunmEnt,tnd Nat lurai Pleso irr-),-S 'ox
�(i:r)i) �_! sii(7; w,v !i1', ot�./;lrli, fiC�a, I'•:', ._o?(9i
S1Jp`-1'1�i F rIA cs1 us
'.i�� 1►tli{1tt111111i�tit'4{t�l�S(fttiit{tt1111i1��Itit{1►tttllttl{

m�0� \NAT �R4G Michael F. Easley
\ Governor
rWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
>_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 25, 2003
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter is to ack-iowledge receipt of your check No. 1253 in the amount of
$200.00 received on September 17, 2003.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
9
Sincerely,
inda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC: (A�sheviTle Regiorial-Office
Enforcement File: CV-01-012
Central Files
i?4CDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10". post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enr. state. nc. us

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 25, 2003
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1247 in the amount of
Zn
$200.00 received on August 15, 2003.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC: jr* Rg alDffc'e
Enforcement File: CV 01-012
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http://772o. enr. state. nc. us
NCDENR
Location:
_,-__.�, 51.2rN. Salisbury -St.,.
i r Raleigh, NC 27699:1161,7
�y
AUG 2 2003 k r
ova: e�c LUAU 1 S7'-' QN1

O� O�W A
G
r
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
Dear Mr. Owenby:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 14, 2003,�-, ,1f�+� �77�
520®3
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1225 in the amount of
$200.00 received on June 13 2003.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC: �A711evi� T IZeglo ial tff rff ci
Enforcement File: CV 0 1-0 12
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
500o recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr. state. nc. us
�.
INCDEr
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

`o�UF WA r�9QG
C.0 r
o -c
July 16, 2003
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
13-
JUL 2 5 2Q03
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1233 in the amount of
$200.00 received on July 15, 2003.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC-1Ash eMmij 1_obai�(J-ff ce
Enforcement File: CV 0 1-0 12
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled110% post -consumer paper
http✓/h2o. enr. state. nc. us
NMU42
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

w
W ATSMichael F. Easley
�G Governor
rWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
>_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
Dear Mr. Owenby:
May 15, 2003
` . IVAY I g
-
::;; .
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1213 in the amount of
$200.00 received on May 12 2003.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
�� Linda Fitzpatri c �� -
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CCz_ce
Enforcement File: CV 01-012
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: . Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr. state. nc. us
INCDENR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
Dear Mr. Owenby:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 10, 2003
FAM1 4 SM
WATER OUALITY SECTION
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Zn
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1198 in the amount of
$200.00 received from Larry W. Owenby.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
r�
inda Fitzpatric
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC � 'As'heV—PE-ee*Re Qionailii@f,�feCe
Enforcement File: CV 01-012
Central Files
NMENIR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper _
http://h2o. en r. s la te. n c. us

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
March 31, 2003
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 4795 in the amount of
$200.00 received from Larry W. Owenby.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
LF:sw
CC: Asti v--Y le -Re Tonal -Office
Enforcement File: CV 01-012
Central Files
2003
Sincerely,
Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper
h ttp://h2o. enr. sta te. nc. us
NCDEPIR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

O�O� W A T �RpG
Michael F. Easley
` Governor
rWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
February 5, 2003 BE-�-.v.
�~
�4.0 _ tj i
MR. LARRY OWENBY MAR _
L. b
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE 20U3
FAIRVIEW NC 28730 4NAi�R (jUr,C!T'r' �.� -=
A:�FiEViLtC REGiO#+IAL QFF!
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1190 in the amount of
$200.00 received from Larry Wade Owenby.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF: sw
CC. hev llle K,egional 0-f-
Enforcement File: CV 01-012
Central Files IKEW
,4cbEP Rt
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 104b post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr. state.nc. us

0� w A
r
MR. LARRY W. OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW, NC 28730
RE: Payment Schedule for Civil Penalty
Case No. CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 31, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
FEB 6 20 t' j
WATER QUALITY SECTIO14
Y �Ssi�!!4� ��p- RE..-_• GtO�tbL 4FFn-- �'� <.:�.�, .I
You have requested a schedule for making partial payments toward the $4,073.39 civil
penalty that was assessed by the Division of Water Quality on November 16, 2001. The
Division is agreeable to a twenty-four (24) month payment schedule beginning on March 1,•2003
and continuing to February 1, 2005. There are twenty-three (23) payments of One hundred
sixty- nine dollars and seventy-two cents ($169.72) beginning on March 1, 2003 and one final
payment of one hundred sixty nine dollars and eighty-three cents ($169.83).
Please sign the attached payment schedule and send it back with your first payment.
Make a copy of the payment schedule for your records. Please make the payments by check
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and mail them so they are
received by the 1st of each month.
Failure to make the monthly payments in accordance with this schedule will cause
the entire unpaid balance of the civil ' penalty to be due and payable and subject to
collection through a civil action in the superior court.
Nt=DEN:R
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
500"o recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
httpJ1h2o. enr.state. nc. us

Mail your payments to the address, shown below to make sure that they 'are properly
recorded.
Mr. Linda Fitzpatrick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or Ms.
Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone], ext. 526.
Sincerely, •
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: rvisor w/o attachment
Enforcement File CV 01-012 w/ attachment
Central Files w/o attachment

CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT PAYMENT SCHEDULE
LARRY W. OWENBY
CASE # CV 01 - 012
On November 16, 2001, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued a civil penalty
assessment in the amount of $4,073.39, including $73.39 in investigative costs, against Mr. Larry
W. Owenby for construction of a sewerage system without a permit. In order to resolve this
matter, DWQ and Mr. Larry Owenby have agreed to enter into a payment schedule.
i
Mr. Owenby agrees to pay the civil assessment of $4,073.39 according to the schedule
below as full settlement of Case No. CV 01 - 012.
Mr. Larry Owenby understands that any default in payment or failure to submit payment
by the day of the month in which payment is due will result in the immediate referral of this case
to the Attorney General's Office for collection through the courts. Mr. Larry Owenby also
acknowledges that DWQ reserves the right to take enforcement action for future violations
within its authority should they occur.
PAYMENT AMOUNT
DATE DUE DATE PAID
$
169.72
3/l/2003
$
169.72
4/l/2003
$
169.72
5/1/2003
$
169.72
6/l/2003
$
169.72
7/ 1 /2003
$
169.72
8/l/2003
$
169.72
9/1/2003
$
169.72
10/1/2003
$
169.72
11/1/2003
$
169.72
12/1/2003
$
169.72
l/l/2004
$
169.72
2/1/2004
$
169.72
3/l/2004
$
169.72
4/1/2004
$
169.72
5/l/2004
$
169.72
6/l/2004
$
169.72
7/l/2004

PAYMENT AMOUNT
$ 169.72
$ 169.72
$ 169.72
$ 169.72
$ 169.72
$ 169.72
$ 169.83
$ 4,073.39
T\ A TT T T TT
8/l/2004
9/l/2004
10/1/2004
l l/l/2004
12/1/2004
1/l/2005
2/1/2005
Payments should be by check payable to "NCDENR" and should be mailed to:
Mr. Linda Fitzpatrick
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NATME
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, Division of Water Quality
Date
Date

o�OF W A TF9QG
August 16, 2004
MR LARRY OWENBY
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE
FAIRVIEW NC 28730
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY SECTION
�HFVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # CV 01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 1530 in the amount of
$200.00 received on July 16, 2004.
Payment of these penalties in no way precludes further action by this Division for
future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone],
extension 526.
Sincerely,
Lmda Fitzpatric
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
LF:sw
CC:' Asheville keaiorial=Office.= g
Enforcement File: CV 0 1-0 12
Central Files
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
h ttpYlh2o. enr. state. nc. us
..
NCDENIR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

4-0
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties
Against LARRY W. OWENBY
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL GFT M�
COMMISSION' Q
Cv 01-012,f"®
APR 2 9 2002
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on 11 April 2002 upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for
entry of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against Larry
W. Owenby in the amount of $4,073.39 ($4,000.00 plus $73.39 investigative costs). Larry W.
Owenby's request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions for
consideration. The Division of Water Quality was represented by Mr. Forrest Westall, Regional
Supervisor in the Asheville Regional Office, and Larry W. Owenby appeared in person.
Having considered the record, arguments of the parties, and the factors set forth in
N.C.G.S. §143B-282.1(b) and (c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts
contained in the Water Quality Supervisor's Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil
Penalties as stipulated by Larry W: Owenby, that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of
Law, and that the Water Quality Supervisor, upon delegation by the Director, properly applied
the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1 in determining the amount of the civil penalties.
The Committee further finds that there are no grounds shown pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143B-282.1
for remission or reduction of the penalties assessed for violation of N.C.G.S. §143-215.1(a)(2) by
construction of a sewer line on or about October 12, 2001 at the mobile home park located at 144

r�
V
Baldwin Road in Buncombe County without first securing the required permit.
Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee finds that no grounds for remission
have been shown and the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $4,073.39
($4,000.00 civil penalty plus $73.39 investigation costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $4,073.39 against
Larry W. Owenby is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon Larry W. Owenby and upon
receipt hereof, the amount of $4,073.39 be paid to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources within thirty days.
This the _�Jf4ay of April, 2002.
Davi H. Moreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Mr. Larry W. Owenby
96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, North Carolina 28730
Mr. Forrest Westall
Regional Supervisor
Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
This the 2. S day of April, 2002.
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT
COURIER MAIL
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
P. O. Box 629
Raleigh, N.C..27602-0629
919/716-6600
3

North Carolina Deoartment of Environment and natural Resources
Ltichael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr.; Secretary
Gregory J. Thoa.pe. Pli.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Larry W. Owenby
96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, North Carolina 28730
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
VIOLATION OF North Carolina General Statutes
Article 21 A, Part I, Section 143-215.1
Construction of Sewerage System Without Permit
Case Number CV 01-012
Buncombe County v
Dear Mr. Owenby:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Larry W.
Owenby, Owner and Developer in the amount of $4073.39 which includes
$73.39 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the assessment
document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation
provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one
of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (do not
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not f
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or
new violation (s) .
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to
consideration of the reasonableness of the amount of the penalty
and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter.
Because a remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the
attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement
which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in, G.S.
1438-282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of
the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental
damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any
previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty
assessment, you must request an administrative hearing. This
request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office
of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your
original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as
evidenced by a date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received
your response, will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney
General's Office with a request. to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for
future violations, which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Max L. Haner at [phone].
Sincerely,
Af
Forrest R. Westall
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
ATTACHMENTS
CC: File CV01-012 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF
LARRY W. OWENBY, DEVELOPER
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
SEWER SYSTEM WITHOUT
A PERMIT
File No. CV 01-012
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-
215.6A, I, Forrest R. Westall, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor, of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Larry W. Owenby is owner and developer of
approximately 1.2 acres of land with an address of
144 Baldwin Road, Arden, N.C. in the Limestone
Section of Buncombe County.
B. On October 12, 2001, DWQ staff observed that
approximately 200 L.F. of 6-inch sewer line (sewer
system) had been constructed to serve a suspected
mobile home park at 144 Baldwin Road in Buncombe
County.
C. A search of DWQ records showed that a permit had
neither been applied for nor issued as of the date
of the inspection for the above -cited construction.
D. The costs to the State of the enforcement
procedures in this matter totaled $73.39.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Larry W. Owenby is a "person" within the meaning of
G.S. 143-215.6 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The sewer system cited in finding of Fact B above
falls within the definition of same at G.S. 143-
213 (15) .
e

C. A permit is required for the construction of a
sewer system pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2).
D. Larry W. Owenby may be assessed civil penalties
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which provides
that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to
secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Larry W. Owenby pursuant to G.S.
143-215.3(a) (9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b) (8) .
F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant
to delegation authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A(h),
has the authority to assess civil penalties in
this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Larry W. Owenby is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ For failing to apply for or to
secure a permit as required by G.S.
143-215.1 for construction of the
subject sewer system.
$ Q� TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 73.39 Enforcement costs
$ 4-0 73. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of
the penalty I considered the factors set out in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources
of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing
to comply with programs over which the Environmental
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Type: (CV) Construction w/o permit
Violator: Larry W. Owenby, Owner & Developer
Address: 96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, North Carolina 28730
Regional Office: Asheville
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources
of the State, to the public health, or to private
property resulting from the violation: None noted at
this time, however, construction without approved plans
and specifications could result in serious O&M problems
with this sewer system in the future; directly affecting
the public health, private property as well as the
State's resources.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: Construction
of approximately 200 L.F. of 6-inch sewer system
extension with cleanouts for the suspected mobile home
park observed October 12, 2001. was completed sometime
prior to October 12, 2001.
(See NOV - Appendix A).
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality: None noted.
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: At this time, cost
of construction without a permit appears equal to the
risk borne by Larry W. Owenby, if DWQ review of plans
and specifications submitted for this project shows need
.for significant modifications.
S. The amount of money saved by non-compliance: Cost of
permit fees plus time saved in waiting for permit
issuance.

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I certify that the information in this report is true
to the best of my knowledge.
Signatur of Principal
Invest.i9 for (s )
,I r
DATE: VAY\1 \ b 11
r

f
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally:
Larry W. Owenby applied for and received a permit from the
Division of Water Quality for construction and operation of
approximately 352 L.F. of 8-inch gravity sewer with manholes
to extend public sewer to property at 144 Baldwin Road in
Buncombe County. Permit WQ0017711 issued 12/7/99 (See Permit
- Appendix B). Correspondence from MSD to Mr. Owenby's
consulting engineer advised of the need for this project to
be placed under a permit. (See MSD correspondence - Appendix
C)
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority: No previous violations of
record.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
Investigative Costs: _ $73.39
9. Type of violator and general nature of business (i.e. Individual
vs. large corporation.
No°other ventures are known at this time.
FA
10. Violators degree of cooperation (including efforts: to prevent or
restore) or recalcitrance: Mr. Owenby was advised on several
occasions through his consulting engineer (See Appendix C) of
the need for a permit to construct a sewer system on this
property.
11. Mitigating Circumstances: Mr. Owenby obtained a permit and
constructed a sewer line extension to this property at a
reported cost of $18,000 (See Appendix D)
12. Check w/ CMS or Permits and Eng. to verify that the facility
does not have a valid permit: No permit application or drawings
have been submitted
as of filing of this report (11/16/01)..
13. Owner of property where the construction occurred: Property
owned by Larry W. Owenby.
14. Pictures of construction activities: (optional): Pictures of
site showing sewer system not developed to date.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
LARRY W. OWENBY )
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER )
SYSTEM WITHOUT A PERMIT )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
File No. CV 01-012
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $ 4,073.39 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division
of Water Quality dated November 16, 2001, the undersigned, desiring to
seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to
an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does
stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
2001.

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - CIVIL PENALTY ASSESSMENT
Violator: Larry W. Owenby, Owner/Developer
County: Buncombe
Case Number: CV01-012
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree a d extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or o private property resulting from the violation;
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
2) The durati and gravity of the violation;
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
3) The effect n ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
4) The cost o rectifying the damage;
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
5) The amount of money saved by nonliance;
( ) not significant ( moderately significant ( ) significant
( very significant ( ) extremely significant
6) Whether th iolation was committed willfully or intentionally;
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
7) The prior re rd of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which a Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
( not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) significant
( ) very significant ( ) extremely significant
8) The cost t the State of the enforcement procedures.
( ) not significant ( ) moderately significant ( ) Sig 'ficant
( ) very significant ( ) ext emel ign'f' an
Y
Date Fo est R. W sta 1, Wa er Quality Skpervisor
As eville Regional Office
REMISSION FACTORS
( ) Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied
to the detriment of the petitioner;
( ) Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
( ) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
( ) Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; and
( ) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Date Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality

11/06/01 TUE 11:38 FAX
11/06/2001 09:44 FAX [phone]
McdILL ASSOCS.
WJ uuz
U001
November 6, 2001
Forrest Westall
Wdter Quality Regional Supervisor
Asheville Regional Office
59 ;woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
i
Dear Mr. Westall:
RE: Proposed Mobile Home Park
Baldwin Road
NOV - G 2�*Ji
This letter serves as response to your Notice of Violation letter dated October 26,
2001 regarding the referenced project.
Please accept my apologies for the circumstances which lead to this notice of
violation. The action surprised both myself and Joel Storrow of McGill Associates,
wh6m I had retained to design the sewer line extension. Through my ignorance I
assumed that a check I had written to the NCDENR in the amount of $400.00 dated
September 18, 2001 had, in fact, granted me permission to install the sewer line.
I have spent $18,000.00 on a permitted sewer line which will be transferred to the
Metropolitan Sewerage District upon final acceptance. This represents a considerable
investment on my part to public sewer improvements in the Baldwin Road area.
Please consider the above facts as mitigating circumstances on my behalf in hopes
of avoiding any monetary penalties. I plan to proceed in all haste to submit a permit
application for the private sewer line on the property. If you have any questions please
do not hesitate to give me a call at 684-1550 or Joel Storrow, McGill Associates, at 252-
0575.
Sincerely,
6
Larry Owenby
cc:; Joel Storrow
M:U97261fw06nov01.doc
f
! ,S

tc0
NCDENR
North Carolina Depart rent of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. }Easley; Governor
Secretary
CERTIFIED MAID
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Larry W. Owenby
96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, North Carolina 28730
Dear Mr. Owenby:
William Cf. Ross, Jr.,
Gregory J. Thorpe..Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of \Water Quality
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
North Carolina General Statutes
Article 21 A, Part I,
Section 143-215.1
Construction Without Permit
Sewerage Collection System
Proposed Mobile Home Park
Buncombe County
An investigation conducted Mr. Max L. Haner, of this office, on
October 12, 2001, indicates that a sewage collection system intended to
serve a project you are developing apparently has been constructed
without a permit from this Division. This project is located on a 1.2
acre site at 144 Baldwin Road in Buncombe County. This letter is to
advise you that such construction - is a violation of North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1 which requires that a permit be
obtained from the Division of Water Quality prior to beginning
construction of any sewer system. This Statute is enforceable under
provisions of NCGS 143-215.6A.
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Owenby
October 26, 2001
Page Two
A search of our files indicates that a permit application for
construction of a sewer system for this project has not been submitted
to date. The investigation indicated that this project involves
construction of approximately two hundred lineal feet of 6-inch sewer
line with cleanouts. It appears to have been connected to the new
sewer line recently constructed along Baldwin Road under a Permit from
this Division (WQ00177011) which was issued to you on December 7, 1999.
This letter is to advise you that a detailed report of this matter
is being prepared for enforcement review and consideration. Should you
have information relative to this violation which you feel should be
considered prior to final action by this Agency, I request that you
submit such information in writing to either Mr. Haner or me on or
before November 5, 2001. Also, please be advised that you should
immediately su pend any construction activities related to this sewage
collection system until the permit application is submitted and a
permit issued.)
By copy of this letter, I am advising the Metropolitan Sewerage
District of Buncombe County that the sewage collection system
constructed -.or `under construction for this project is not approved and
a permit has not' been issued by this Division as required by the North
Carolina General Statutes. As result and until the proper reviews can
be made and a permit issued by this Division, no`building permits
should be approved which would result in connection of sewer service to
this project -
Thank you for your attention to this matter. You may call Mr.
Haner or me at telephone; [phone] if you have questions or wish
a more detailed discussion of this problem.
Sinc ely,
Forrest R. Westall
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
xc: Tom Hartye - MSD
Layton Long - Buncombe County Health Department
Max Haner
Asheville Regional Office, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled\110% Post Consumer Paper

FPFWW_
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
December 7, 1999
Larry Owenby
96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, NC 28730
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AN
Subject: Permit No. W1Qi'` + il_7f7_4Jj
Larry Owenby
Baldwin Road Sewer Extension
Wastewater Collection System
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Owenby:
In accordance with your application received November 4, 1999, attached is Permit No.
WQ0017711, dated December 7, 1999, to Larry Owenby for the construction and operation of the
subject wastewater collection extension.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and you shall be subject
to the conditions and limitations as specified in the North Carolina Gravity Sewer Design Criteria
adopted February 12, 1996 and the attached permit.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations, permission is hereby granted
for the construction and operation of approximately 352 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer to serve five
units as part of the Baldwin Road Sewer Extension project, and the discharge of 1,500 GPD of collected
domestic wastewater into the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County's existing sewerage
system, pursuant to the application received November 4, 1999, and in conformity with the North
Carolina Gravity Sewer Design Criteria.
The ,sewage and wastewater collected by this system shall be treated in the Metropolitan
Sewerage District of Buncombe County Wastewater Treatment Facility (NPDES Permit No.
NCO024911) prior to being discharged into the receiving stream.
This permit shall become voidable unless the agreement between Larry Owenby and
Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County for the collection and final treatment of
wastewater is in full force and effect.
Construction of the subject wastewater collection system shall not commence until approval for
the construction and operation of these sewers has been obtained from the Metropolitan Sewerage
District of Buncombe County.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
lk4

If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service,
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any and all
statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local,
state, and federal) which have jurisdiction.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Kristin Miguez at
[phone] extension 524.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Buncombe County Health Department
`shev_ille_Regional.:Office1, Water Quality Section
McGill Associates

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
GRAVITY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS PERMIT
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations:
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with the
conditions of the Division of Water Quality Gravity Sewer Design Criteria adopted February 12,
1996.
2. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the
application and other supporting data.
3. The facilities must be properly maintained and operated at all times.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change ownership;
or there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be submitted to the
Division of Water Quality (Division) accompanied by an application fee, documentation from the
parties involved, and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request
will be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
5. Construction of the gravity sewers shall be scheduled so as not to interrupt service by the existing
utilities nor result in an overflow or bypass discharge of wastewater to the surface waters of the
State.
6. Upon completion of construction and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification
and a copy of the record drawings (i.e., as constructed plans) must be received from a professional
engineer certifying that the permitted facility has been installed in accordance with the Division of
Water Quality Gravity Sewer Design Criteria adopted February 12, 1996, and other supporting
materials. If this project is to be completed in phases and partially certified, you shall retain the .
responsibility to track further construction approved under the same permit, and shall provide a final
certificate of completion once the entire project has been completed. A copy of the record
drawings, indicating the facilities constructed in the phase being certified, shall be submitted with
each partial certification. Mail the Certification and one (1) copy of the "Record Drawings" to the
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
7. A copy of the Record Drawings shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five
years from the date of the completion of construction.
8. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this general sewer permit or the
North Carolina Gravity Sewer Design Criteria may subject the Permittee to an enforcement action
by the Division, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.

9. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance
conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action, including those as may be required
by this Division, such as the construction of additional or replacement wastewater collection
facilities. `
10. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Asheville Regional Office, telephone number (828)
251-6208, as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day,
following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of either of the following:
a. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that renders the facility incapable
of adequate wastewater transport, such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, line
blockage or breakage, etc.; or
b. Any failure of a sewer line resulting in a by-pass directly to receiving waters without treatment
of all or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within
five (5) days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions
taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
Permit issued this the Seventh day of December, 1999
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
c
K�tr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0017711
2

Permit No. WQ0017711
December 7, 1999
ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
Partial Final
I, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the
project; , for the
Project Name Location and County
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation
rl
of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance of
this permit, the certificate of coverage, the North Carolina Gravity Sewer Minimum Design Manual, and
other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
The above Engineer's Certification must be completed and submitted to the address below with one (1)
copy of the "Record Drawings" (i.e., as -constructed plans) of the wastewater collection system This
project shall not be considered complete and allowed to operate until this Engineer's Certification and
the "Record Drawings" plans have been submitted. Any wastewater flow made tributary to the
wastewater collection system prior to completion of this Engineer's Certification shall be considered a
violation of the permit and shall. subject the Permittee to appropriate enforcement actions.
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
3

11/18/01 TITE 14:34 FAX [phone] MSD Engineering
[a 001/005
METROPOLITAN 81=WERAGE DISTRICT
OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY, N.G,
ENGINEERING/PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
Post Office Box 8969
Asheville, North Carolina 28814
TELEPHONE: [phone]
TELEFAX: [phone]
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET
TO: Ax OAmgtz, DATE: -17-01
._ TIME: ? M
FROM: W(r,- 84mv , FAX NO..2r/ , 40S. —
NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)
MESSAGE: I
v6C,Wer �
C ill
L
Note: if you do not receive all the pages indicated above, please call [phone] and the
appropriate pages will be re -transmitted.

11/13/01 TUE 14:34 FAX [phone] MSD Engineering
IM 002/005
2_
3.
61
A
9.
10.
11,
12.
13,
14.
15.
16.
17.
Baldwin Road Sewer Extension
MSD PROJECT 1999143
Pre -Construction Meeting
June 28, 2001, 8:15 AM
Attendees
Mike Stamey
MSD
251-4781
Dan Cook
MSD
251-4781
Dewey Barlett
Contractor
778-6672 Fax [phone]
Russell Bartlett
Contractor
298-0690 Fax [phone]
Not Present-
Owner— Larry Owenby Z_— M k eo cop
Engineer— McGill and Associates (Van Waters)tikea <.�,•-�
Meeting_ Notes:
1, The scope or the approved work in this oroiect is 3521 F, of 8-inch sewer and manholes in the
DOT right of way. The on -site collector sewer has notTpproved by MSD or DENR at this time.
The owner and engineer need to complete review process for the on -site sewer before its
construction can occur.
Any additional extension of 8-inch sewer line in the DOT right of way must first be approved by
S�e
, and DOT
iremen orthis line, including density testing and surface restoration are to meet
MSD standards. Such density testing is to be performed at the direction of the MSD
representative. Engineer to provide density test results to MSD upon request,
At the new manhole connection on the existing clay sewer line, "fernco" couplings must be
used where new pipes connect to the clay pipe.
A watertight plug shall installed in the open end of the pipeline during excavation or any period
of inactivity.
Pipe keys must be installed on sewer line on each side of creek crossing_ Contractor given
detail for these keys in meeting,
Ductile iron need not be bedded if laying conditions are dry and pipe is laid on undisturbed
earth.
Bedding on PVC services to be placed up to spring line of pipe unless in cases of inundation
where the embedment must cover the pipe.
Clean outs are to be placed on all 4" and 6" lines, 10' off of 8" main.
6" lines must connect to 8" line at manhole. 4" Services may connect in -line to main.
Surveyor to stake out sewer route prior to starting.
Contractor will need to meet requirements of DOT for work in road right of ways.
Testing to include low-pressure air testing of pipeline, vacuum testing of manholes,
24 hour prior notice for specific testing or needs
CO's not to be released until all final engineering documents are in hand.
Working hours 8-4:30, Monday through Friday.
MSD inspectors are present for observation and information. It is the responsibility of the
Engineer of Record to be present to witness any part of construction that is required for his or
her certification process.

11/13/01 TUE 14:35 FAX [phone] MSD Engineering
IM 003/005
Metropolitan Sewerage District of
M S D Buncombe County, North Carolina
W.H. Mull, P.E•, Ganaral Manager
P.Q. Box 8969, Aahavlllo, N.C. 28814
Telephone: Area Code [phone] y`tPN '�GFo
� l
Telacopier: [phone]
Willlam Clarke, General Counsel bi �
tr Y j lk
February 16, 2000 oovrra ■o►',0
Mr. Vann Waters
McGill and Associates, P.A.
PO Box 2259
Asheville, NC 28802
Re: Baldwin Road Sewer Extension (Private, Out of District)
Larry Owenby Property
Dear Mr. Waters,
Brady M. Blackburn. Chairman
C. Michael Sobol, Vice -Chairman
Jackie W. Bryson, Sacratarylrreasurir
Steven T. Aceto
Barbara A. Field
David Gantt
Elizabeth C. Graham
E. Glenn Kelly
Ben Pace
S. Douglas Spell
W. Donald Venable
Enclosed is 1 set of plans approved as noted, by the District for the above referenced sewer extension.
MSD approval is for the purpose of designing sanitary sewers in accordance with District standards and
does not exempt you from the necessity of obtaining the appropriate 'Non -Discharge Permit" from the State
of North Carolina (or any other required agency approvals).
You may contact the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources at 59 Woodfin
Place in Asheville, NC (phone [phone]) for assistance.
Be advised that the proposed concrete keys at creek crossing must be constructed in accordance with detail
we attached to approved plan.
You will need to contact the District supervisor of inspections, Mr. Mike Schraven at [phone] to
arrange a pre -construction meeting prior to beginning work. Before this meeting, MSD will need a copy of
State Permit.
Please be aware of the following:
1. Review of this project by MSD in noway indicates authority to access private property without obtaining
—the appropriate permission/agreement from the property owner.
01
by MSD prior to
Very truly yours,
Michael Stamey
MSD Planning and Development
QC: Max Haner Mike Schraven
serve Mr. Owenby's pro
and

11/13/01 TUE 14:35 FAX [phone] MSD Engineering
IM 004/005
MSDMetropolitan Sewerage District of
Buncornbe County, North Carolina
W.H. Mull, P.E., General Manager
P.O. Box $969, Asheville, N.C. 28814
A� $EWER
Talsphona: Area Coda [phone]
Tolecopier- [phone]
k �
!u y
John S. Stevens, Goneral Counsel
Fall
November 18,1999
Mr. Vann Waters
McGill and Associates, P.A.
PO Box 2259
Asheville, NC 28802
Re: Baldwin Road Sewer Extension
Larry Owenby Property
Dear Mr. Waters,
Edmund R. Selby, Chalnman
c. Michacl Sobot, VIae-Chalrman
Jackie W. Brysom.SecrataryrrreaSurer
Steven T. A4eto
Brady Slaokbum
Barbara A. Flerd
Elizabeth C. Graham
E. Glenn Kelly
Ben Pace
S. pouglab Spell
W. Donald Venable
Thank you for speaking with me yesterday regarding your submittal for the above noted project. As
you now know, the proposed sewer extension can not be considered for MSD ownership and
maintenance due to the location being outside the current District boundary. As this sewer line will
exit Mr. Owenby's property and traverse a road right of way (before connecting to the MSD system)
it will, however, need to be designed and constructed in accordance appropriate MSD standards.
We have reviewed the plans for conformance with these standards and have listed our comments
below.
1. Please add a note to plan stating MSD standards supersede all others in sewer construction.
2. Please add a note to plan stating that existing sewer line must be cut and new pre -cast
manhole installed (no "doghouse" manhole allowed).
3. The plans show the sewer crossing under a creek at Sta. 10+50 +1-. Please show concrete
keys on the sewer line on each side of the creek crossing. These keys should be
approximately 5 feet into each bank with station numbers indicated on plan. In addition, rip -rap
should be installed on creek banks at this location. Please add enclosed concrete key detail to
plan.
4. The plan shows an 18 L_F_ section of DIP at approximate station 12+50. MSD standards only
allow one in -line pipe material transition. Please revise the plan to show DIP for the entire
length of this line between manholes or DIP from sta. 10+12.47 manhole to at least 10 feet
beyond the ditch at approximate station 12+50.
5. Please note the owner (DOT) and clearly define the width and limits of the right of way for
Baldwin Road on plan_
6. As the connection manhole will be on the existing MSD main, its cover will need to show the
MSD logo. The other two proposed manhole covers, however, can not include the MSD logo,

11/13/01 TUE 14;36 FAX [phone] MSD Engineering
1 . S
2 005/005
%loot►1$ , � `T71
!,1-
as they will be part of a private system. Please add a note to plan at manholes addressing
these requirements.
7. Please add the MSD service line and Clean -out box details to plan. (Copies enclosed)
8. Prior to plan approval, MSD must receive a copy of the executed NC DOT encroachment
agreement for proposed work in road. As we discussed MSD can not sign this agreement due
to sewer line being "Out -of -District".
9. Will an approval by the Army Corps of Engineers or other agency be needed for work at
creeks? Please advise and provide MSD copies of (any) approval documents
10. One condition of the MSD allocation letter for this project was execution of a sewerage
disposal agreement. Tom Peters of this office is preparing the agreement and will be sending it
to Mr. Owenby for signing very soon, This agreement is required prior to operation of sewer
line.
11. It is our understanding that all off -site sewer line construction will be confined to the limits of
Baldwin Road (SR 3189) per the right of way limit line shown on plans submitted on November
3, 1999. Be advised that review of this project by MSD for sewer line work/construction in no
way indicates authority to access private property without obtaining the appropriate
ermissionlagreement from the property owner.
12. The future on-si a sewer ex ension o serve r. Owenby's property will need to be reviewed
and approved by MSD prior to construction.
Please revise the plans to address the above comments and resubmit the revised plans for further
review and approval. (We will need 4 sets of plans for the approval process.)
As you may be aware, a °non -discharge" permit from NC DENR will need to be obtained for this
project.
Please give me a call at [phone] if you have any questions.
Mike a�`mey"~
MSD Planning

PPPPPPP'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D., Acting Director
A14
• �
wrnrSNVOMWEMSmD
NMIW
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 18, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Larry W. Owenby
NCR 2 ► tong
96 Cane Crest Circle j
Fairview NC 28730 WATER
ASIiEVfLLE �EOI;,i,IAL OFFif;t; _
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Baldwin Road, Arden, N.C.
Buncombe County
File No. CV 01-012
Dear Mr. Owenby:
The subject request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002, meeting
of the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the closing of the regularly scheduled business meeting
of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Hearing Room of the Archdale
Building located at 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed map). All materials
you provided to the Director will be provided to the EMC CCPR for review. However, should you decide
to attend, you should arrive no later than 11:30 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. I (b) were wrongly
applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
Mailing Address: Telephone (9I9) 733-5083 Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier#52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
ht1p://1z20. enr. state. tic. tes

PPPPPFP'
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty,
or the entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment
for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please call Linda Fitzpatrick, of our staff, at [phone], ext. 526.
Sincerely,
cc: DWQ Es&'-uMe Regional Office
Enforcement File
Central Files

Mr. Steve Lewis
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Resources
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Response to Assessment
of Civil Penalties
Case Number CV-01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
This letter serves as official response to a letter from your department dated November 16,
2001. The letter assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $4,073.39 for violation of the North Carolina
General Statutes involving construction of a sewerage system without a permit.
I do not contest the factual or legal issues in this case and furthermore enclose the required
waiver and stipulation form. I do, however, request remission of the penalty due to the following
circumstances:
1. The illegal sewerage system installed was not placed in use and therefore did not create any
undue environmental hazard.
2. The sewerage system is considered private, which I was unaware required a permit from your
office. This project also involved a public wastewater collection system, for which I received a
permit from the Metropolitan Sewerage District (MSD). I subsequently constructed this system
and transferred ownership to the MSD. This public system involved an investment of
approximately $18,000 on my part, which represents a considerable investment in the extension
of a utility for the public good.
3. I have endeavored to take steps to resolve this matter by applying for the necessary private
sewer system permit. In fact, I am enclosing copies of the permit application and "As -Built"
drawings demonstrating my efforts to comply with the regulations. My official request for a
private sewer system permit is being sent to the Division under separate cover.
Please consider the above facts as mitigating circumstances on my behalf in hopes of reducing
or avoiding any monetary penalties. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate giving me a call
at 828-684-1550.
Sincerely,
c:� 0-14-64
Larry Owenby
Enclosures
cc: Forrest Westall
e�Ma.. a e

7ru
1 UJ. J7 T
"Iwrps OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE:.
IN THR MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
C.)p CIVIL PFNALTIE,S AGAINST )
LARRY W . OWE,NBY )
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER )
SYSTEM WITHOUT A PERMIT )
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
TA .
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
File No. CV 01-012
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $ 4,073.39 for
violatioxi (s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division
of WAter Qucjl i ty dated November 16, 2001, the undersigned, desiring Co
scck r---.missiori of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to
a1-1 admiriitrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does
-t:i.puiate. 01at the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the.
day of
11 2001.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
12/12/2001 WED 09:36 [TX/RX NO 60781 U 001

Buncombe Engineering
P. O. Box 8074
Asheville, NC 28814
December 12, 2001
Mr. Gregory I Thorpe, Ph.D.
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources .
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Sewer System Extension
Lynn Brook Mobile Home Park
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
On behalf of Lynn Brook Association, please find enclosed the following in support of a
request of a Non -Discharge Permit in conjunction with the referenced project:
1. One (1) original and one (1) copy of completed Non -Discharge Permit -Gravity
Sewer Collection Systems.
2. Check made payable to NCDENR in the amount of $400.00.
3. Copy of Flow Acceptance Letter from the Metropolitan Sewerage District.
4. One (1) original copy of Watershed Classification Attachment.
5. Three(3) of engineering drawings detailing the proposed gravity sewer system
extension.
6. One(1) original and two(2) copies of completed Operational Agreement.
The project consists of approximately 445 lineal feet (L.F.) 6-inch gravity sewer with
cleanouts. Note that a portion of an existing 4-inch collection system is proposed to be
replaced with 6-inch sewer as detailed on the engineering drawings.
We appreciate your earliest review of this submittal. Should there be any questions,
please give me a call.
Enclosures
cc: Larry Owenby, w/encl.
WMax 1-1—i-e end
Mike Stamey, w/encl.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
FAST -TRACK APPLICATION
for GRAVITY SEWERS, PUMP STATIONS, AND FORCE MAINS
(Pressure sewers systems are not to be included as part of this application package)
THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL.
INSTRUCTIONS: Indicate that you have included the following list of required application package items by
signing your initials in the space provided next to each item. Failure to submit all required items will lead to
additional processing and review time for the permit application.
ZnWO x A. Application Form - Submit one original and one copy of the completed and appropriately executed
application form. Any changes to this form will result in the application being returned. The Division of
Water Quality (Division) will only accept application packages that have been fully completed with all
applicable items addressed. You do not need to submit detailed plans and specifications unless you
I respond NO to item IV.6. and/or item IV.10.
B. Attachment - Submit the completed and properly executed Form WSCA 10/99 for each watershed within
the project location.
yam, / x C. Application Fee - Submit a check in the amount of $400 made payable to: North Carolina Department of
oC Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR).
D. Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity - If the application is being submitted in the name of a
privately -owned public utility, submit two copies of the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity,
which demonstrates that the public utility is authorized to hold the utility franchise for the area to be served
by the sewer extension. If a.Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity has not been issued, provide
two copies of a letter from the NC Utilities Commission's Public Staff that states that an application for a
franchise has been received, that the service area is contiguous to an existing franchised area, and/or that
franchise approval is expected.
E. Operational Agreements - Submit one original and two copies of a properly executed operational
agreement if the sewer extension will be serving residential or commercial lots (e.g., houses,
condominiums, townhomes, outparcels, etc.) that will be owned by a homeowners' association or developer.
If the applicant is a homeowners' association, use Form HOA 10/99. If the applicant is a developer, use
Form DEV 10/99.
0,, We x F. Flow Acceptance Letters -If the owner of the downstream sewers and/or WWTF is different from the
applicant, submit two copies of a flow acceptance letter from the owner of the downstream sewers and
WWTF. Flow acceptance letters must contain the following minimum information: applicant and project
name, amount of flow accepted, and name and permit number of the receiving sewers/WWTF. The flow
acceptance must not expire prior to permit issuance and must be dated less than a year prior to the
application date. Intergovernmental agreements or other contracts will not be accepted in lieu of a project -
specific flow acceptance letter.
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING
INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING
ADDRESS:NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service: By Courier/Special Delivery:
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER❑ 0512 NORTH SALISBURY STREET, SUITE
1219RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-
1617 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FACSIMILE NUMBER: [phone]

For more information, visit our web site at: h2o. enr state ne us/ndpu/

Application Number: (to be completed by DWQ)
L GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name (name of the municipality, corporation, individual; etc.):
Lynn Brook Association
2. Owner's or signing official's name and title (15A NCAC 2H .0206(b)):
Larry Owenby
3.
Name and complete address of applicant: 96 Cane Crest Circle
City: Fairview
State:
NC Zip: `
28730
Telephone number: (828 )
684-1550
Facsimile number: (828
) 684-2265
4. Project name (name of the subdivision, facility or establishment, etc): Lynn Brook
Mobile Home Park Extension
5. County where project is located: Buncombe
6. Fee submitted: $ 400.00 (See Instruction C.)
7. Name and complete address of engineering firm: Buncombe Engineering
41 Kenilworth Road .... Unit #19
City: Asheville,
State:
NC Zip:
28803
Telephone number: (828 )
423-4501
Facsimile number: (828
) 684-5080
8. Name and affiliation of contact person who can answer questions about application:
Michael Palmer Malachi, Buncombe Engineering
H. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Project is: X new; modification
2. If this application is being submitted as a result of a modification to an existing permit,

provide: existing permit number and the issuance
date
3. Applicant is: public X private
If private, units (lots, townhomes, etc.) are: X leased (Skip to item III.); sold
If sold, facilities owned by a: public utility (See Instruction D.);
homeowners' association/developer (See
Instruction E.)
III. INFORMATION ON WASTEWATER:
1. Please provide a one- or two -word description specifying the origin of the wastewater
(school, subdivision, hospital, commercial facility, industry, apartments, condominiums, etc.):
Mobile Home Park (Residential)
2. Volume of wastewater generated by this project: 1440
gallons per day
3. Explanation of how wastewater flow was determined (15A NCAC 2H .0219(1)): _
6—two bedroom singlewide mobile homes @ 120 gpd/bedroom
4. Nature of wastewater: 100 % Domestic/Commercial; %
Industrial; % Other waste - specify:
5. If wastewater is industrial in nature:
a. Level of pretreatment that has been provided to ensure protection of the receiving collection
system and wastewater treatment facility: N/A
b. If a pretreatment permit is required, has one been issued? Yes; No. If
yes, please attach a copy of the pretreatment permit. If no, provide date application was
submitted:
IV. DESIGN INFORMATION:
1. Brief project description: gravity sewer system extension to serve 6 lot
mobile home park
2. Owner and name of wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) receiving wastewater (See

Instruction F.): Metropolitan Sewerage District
3. WWTF permit number (NC00***** or WQ00*****):
4. List the owner(s) of any intermediate sewers if different from applicant or owner of
WWTF (See Instruction F.): N/A
5. Summary of GRAVITY SEWER to be permitted:
Diameter
6. Does the subject gravity sewer collection system comply with the most recent version of the
Gravity Sewer Minimum Design Criteria and 15A NCAC 2H .0200? X Yes; No.
If no, please identify criteria and explain:
7. Summary of PUMP STATIONS to be permitted: N/A
No. or Nanie I Design Flow (MGD) Pump Operational
Points GPM @ feet TDH Reliability Option Selected
8. Summary of FORCE MAIN to be permitted: TT i A
Diameter inches Length linear feet
9. List any equipment being utilized that is not specifically mentioned elsewhere in the
application or as part of the Minimum Design Criteria (e.g., telemetry, hoist, odor control
equipment, mechanical bar screens, etc.):

10. Do the subject pump stations and force mains comply with the Minimum Design
Criteria for the Fast -Track Permitting of Pump Stations and Force Mains document adopted
June 1, 2000 and 15A NCAC 2H .0200? Yes; No. If no, please identify criteria
and explain: N/A
NOTE: If you responded NO to item IVA and/or item IV.10. above, two
(2) copies of detailed plans, specifications, supporting information, and any
other materials
pertaining to the identified criteria should be submitted with the
completed and appropriately executed application form.

V. CERTIFICATIONS
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I, Michael Palmer Malachiattest that this application for Lynn Brook Mobile
Home Park Sewer Extension has been reviewed by me
and is accurate, complete and consistent with the information in the engineering plans,
calculations, and all other supporting documentation to the best of my knowledge. I further attest
that to the best of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the
applicable regulations, Gravity Sewer Minimum Design Criteria for Gravity Sewers adopted
February 12, 1996, and the Minimum Design Criteria for the Fast -Track Permitting of Pump
Stations and Force Mains adopted June 1, 2000. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my
signature and seal signifies that I have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent
with the proposed design. Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-
215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in
any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed
$10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's seal, signature, and date:
V�u016 It
r
014
~ sEAL
q= l
All
Applicant's Certification:
I, Larry Owenby , attest that this application for Lynn" Brook Mobile Home
Park Sewer Extension has been reviewed by me
and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of
this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments
are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. Note: In
accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly
makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a
Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up
to $25,000 per viiation.
Date:

LYNN BROOK ASSOCIATION PH. 828-271-0328
96 CANE CREST CIRCLE -
FAIRVIEW, NC 28730
FAY TO THEORDER F
ARS O v
assos BMT r
6256
nncn "S'"6 .o NVIL-1 mLEust RcD..--P—
HENDERSO, P.O. 60X 486
FL/ET^C71HER, NC 28732
MEMO ,l,Jf —/
-1:053101L20:52L5MG2010

MSDMetropolitan Sewerage District of
Buncombe County, North Carolina
W.M. Mull, P.E., con"i mmagef
Edmund R. Selby, Chairman
P.O. Bo: alit, Aah*Alle, N.C. 2"14
� gEMEq4O
C. Michael Scbol, Vks Chalnnan
Telsome; Ar" Cc* (121) 26 -914
F
Jadch W. Bryson. Se=tary/freasumr
Tel.eoplsr:(e28) 2S4-32"
`NAY0
to _T �
5mdy Blackburn
Barbara A Field
John S. Sdsvars, 3en9ral Counsel
~
Ellvbom C. Grahem
E, Olenn Kelly
�``
Ben Pace
S. Douglas Spell
•�„� ���"`'�
W. Donald vnablo
October 18, 1999
Mr. Larry W. Owenby
Luv Homes
96 Cane Crest Circle
Fairview, NC 2897
Subject: Wastewater Allocation # 1999143
" Baldwin Road Sewer •
Project # 1999143 (This # should be referred to concerning
any and all correspondence with this project).
Dear Mr. Owenby:
The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County is presently approving
new sources of wastewater for treatment. As a result of your request, we are allocating
1,500 GPD for the proposed sewer extension to be located along Baldwin Road in the
Fletcher area, (PIN 9653.08-88-7693). This allocation is based on 100 GPD per
bedroom for a total of 15.
The District understands you wish to construct a sewer extension to serve 5
mobile homes to be located on site. You will need to submit sewer plans to Mr. Mike
Stamey of this office for review and approval_ Additionally, as you propose to install this
sewer line in the D.O.T. - right-of-way, you will need to procure authorization from them_
Also, according to your proposed drawing, you will need to procure authorization to cross
private property. Be advised that the sewer line easement will need to meet MSD
standards.
Also since the property for which the.. allocation is being made is outside the
Metropolitan Sewer District boundary, a contract must be entered Into for the treatment of
the wastewater. A contract will be forwarded to you for execution in the near future.
All connections (public, private, or service) to the MSD sewer system must
conform to current MSD Specifications and Standards.

If you have any questions concerning this, you may contact Mr. Mike Butler,
Engineering Division, at 251- 4781.
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources,
(NCDENR), requires MSD to issue allocation approval for any connection to the sewer
system other than single family homes. Receipt of this letter confirms that capacity exists
for the requested discharge. This approval letter is NOT to be used to obtain a building
permit.
This approval is for domestic wastewater from sanitary conveniences only. If any
wastewater from commercial or industrial operations is anticipated or proposed, The
MSD office of Industrial and commercial Waste shall be notified in advance and approval
obtained prior to discharging to the MSD Sewer System. Questions concerning
commercial or industrial waste discharges may be directed to Mr. Monty Payne at
telephone [phone].
This allocation will expire on October 18, 2000.If construction has not started
before expiration of this allocation a new allocation must be requested.
Prior to beginning construction, a permit will be required from the State for
design of any new sewer line to carry wastewater from the proposed project. If you have
any questions in this regard, please contact the Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources at telephone [phone]-
We are enclosing a Domestic Wastewater Sewer Application. This application
covers the new development facility depletion fees (computations are on the back). All
applicants will be subject to the facility fees. This application must be completed and
returned to Ms. Christine Warren, Systems Coordinator, with the appropriate fees prior to
connecting to the sewer system. Ms. Warren's office is located at Riverside Business
Park at 2000 Riverside Drive, and she can be reached.at 251-4781.
If we can be of further service or answer any questions, please contact us.
very trull ,yours,
Tom Peters,
Engineering Division
TJP/tp
Enclosure
cc: Mr_ Max Haner
Ms. Beverly Evans
Mr: Mike Stamey
Mr. Jon Creighton
Ms. Christine Warren

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WATERSHED CLASSIFICATION ATTACHMENT
Any changes made to this form will result in the application being returned.
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
INSTRUCTIONS:
To determine the classification of the watershed(s) in which the subject project will be located, you are required to
submit this form, with Items 1 through 8 completed, to the appropriate Division of Water Quality Regional Office
Water Quality Supervisor (see Page 2 of 2) prior to submittal of the application for review. At a minimum, you must
include an 8.5" by 11" copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map that shows the surface waters
immediately downslope of the project. You must identify the location of the project and the closest downslope
surface waters (waters for which you are requesting the classification) on the submitted map copy. If the facility is
located in the Neuse River Basin, also include a copy of the soil survey map for the project location. The
corresponding non -discharge application may not be submitted until this form is completed by the appropriate
regional office and included with the submittal.
1. Applicant's name (name of the municipality, corporation, individual, etc.): Lynn Brook Association
2. Name and complete address of applicant: Lynn Brook Association,
96 Cane Crest Circle
City: Fairview State: NC Zip: 28730
Telephone number: (828 ) 684-1550 Facsimile number: (828 ) 684-2265
3. Project name (name of the subdivision, facility or establishment, etc.): Lynn Brook Mobile . Home Park
Sewer Extension
4. County where project is located: Buncombe
5. Name(s) of closest surface waters: Pinner Creek
6. River basin(s) in which the project is located: Fren c b Broad
7: Topographic map name and date: Fruitland, NC — 1965 (photo reyAsc 1980)
8. North Carolina Professional Engineer's seal, signature, and date: ` �`` • �O¢/�
a� i g
TO: REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY SUPERVISOR
Please provide me with the classification(s) of the surface waters, watershed(s), and appropriate river basin(s) where
these activities will occur, as identified on the attached map segment:
Name(s) of surface waters and river basin(s):
Classification(s) (as established by the EMC):
Proposed clagsification(s), if applicable:
River basin buffer rules, if applicable:
Signature of regional office personnel: Date:
FORM: WSCA 10/99 Page 1 of 2

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES
Asheville Regional Office Fayetteville Regional Office
WQ Supervisor WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville, NC 28301
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Avery
Macon
Anson
Moore
Buncombe
Madison
Bladen
Robeson
Burke
McDowell
Cumberland
Richmond
Caldwell
Mitchell
Harnett
Sampson
Cherokee
Polk
Hoke
Scotland
Clay
Rutherford
Montgomery
Graham
Swain
Haywood
Transylvania
Henderson
Yancey
Jackson
Raleigh Regional Office
Washington Regional Office
WQ Supervisor
WQ Supervisor
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
943 Washington Square Mall
Raleigh, NC
27609
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: (919)
571-4700
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Chatham
Nash
Beaufort
Jones
Durham
Northampton
Bertie
Lenoir
Edgecombe
Orange
Camden
Martin
Franklin
Person
Chowan
Pamlico
Granville
Vance
Craven
Pasquotank
Halifax
Wake
Currituck
Perquimans
Johnston
Warren
Dare
Pitt
Lee
Wilson
Gates
Tyrell
Greene
Washington
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Winston-Salem Regional Office
WQ Supervisor
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alamance Rockingham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe
Stokes
Caswell
Surry
Davidson
Watauga
Davie
Wilkes
Forsyth
Yadkin
Mooresville Regional Office
WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Street
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Alexander
Lincoln
Cabarrus
Mecklenburg
Catawba
Rowan
Cleveland
Stanly
Gaston
Union
Iredell
Wilmington Regional Office
WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Brunswick New Hanover
Carteret Onslow
Columbus Pender
Duplin
FORM: WSCA 10/99 Page 2 of 2

OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTYOF Buncombe Permit No.
OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT made pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1 (dl) and entered into this day of
, by and between the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, an agency of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter known as the COMMISSION; and
Lynn Brook Association , a corporation/general partnership registered/licensed to do
business in the State of North Carolina, hereinafter known as the DEVELOPER.
WITNESSETH:
1. The DEVELOPER is the owner of the certain lands lying in Buncombe County, upon
which it is erecting and will erect dwelling units and other improvements, said development to be known
as Lynn Brook Mobile e Home park (hereinafter the Development).
2. The DEVELOPER desires, to construct a wastewater collection system with pumps, wastewater treatment
works, and/or disposal facilities (hereinafter Disposal System) to provide sanitary sewage disposal to serve
the Development on said lands.
3. The DEVELOPER has applied to the COMMISSION for the issuance of a permit pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.1 to construct, maintain, and operate the Disposal System.
4. The DEVELOPER has created or shall create unit ownership in said dwellings units, other improvements
and lands through filing of a Declaration of Unit Ownership (hereinafter Declaration), pursuant to Chapter
47C of the North Carolina General Statutes.
5. The DEVELOPER has caused to be formed or will cause to be formed at the time of filing of the
Declaration, the (Unit Owners' Association) (hereinafter
Association), a non-profit corporation organized and existing under and by the virtue of the laws of the
State of North Carolina, for the purpose, among others, of handling the property, affairs and business of
the Development; of operating, maintaining, re -constructing and repairing the common elements of the
lands and improvements subject to unit ownership, including the Disposal System; and of collecting dues
and assessments to provide funds for such operation, maintenance, re -construction and repair.
6. The COMMISSION desires to assure that the Disposal System of the Development is properly
constructed, maintained and operated in accordance with law and permit provisions in order to protect the
quality of the waters of the State and the public interest therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the benefits to be derived by each of the parties
hereto, the COMMISSION and DEVELOPER do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. The DEVELOPER shall construct the Disposal System in accordance with the permit and plans and
specifications hereafter issued and approved by the COMMISSION, and shall thereafter properly operate
and maintain such systems and facilities in accordance with applicable permit provisions and law.
2. The DEVELOPER shall not transfer ownership and/or control of the Disposal System to the Association
until construction has been completed in accordance with the permit and approved plans, and the staff of
the Division of Water Quality has inspected and approved of the facilities. In order to change the name of
the permit holder, the DEVELOPER must request that the permit be reissued to the Association. The
request must include a copy of the Association Bylaws and Declaration.
3. The DEVELOPER shall not transfer, convey, assign or otherwise relinquish or release its responsibility
for the operation and maintenance of its Disposal System until a permit has been reissued to the
DEVELOPER's successor.
4. The DEVELOPER shall provide in the Declaration and Association Bylaws that the Disposal System and
appurtenances thereto are part of the common elements and shall thereafter be properly maintained and
operated in conformity with law and the provisions of the permit for construction, operation, repair, and
FORM: DEV 10/99 Page 1 of 2

ai enance of the system and facilities. The Declaration and Bylaws shall identity the entire wastewater
PPP treatment, collection and disposal system as a common element which will receive the highest priority for
expenditures by the Association except for Federal, State, and local taxes and insurance.
D. The DEVELOPER shall provide in the Declaration and Association Bylaws that the Disposal System will
be maintained out of the common expenses. In order to assure that there shall be funds readily available to
repair, maintain or construct the Disposal System, beyond the routine operation and maintenance
expenses, the Declaration and Association Bylaws shall provide that a fund be created out of the common
expenses. Such fund shall be separate from the routine maintenance funds allocated for the facility and ,
shall be part of the yearly budget.
6. In the event the common expense allocation and separate fund are not adequate for the construction,
repair, and maintenance of the Disposal System, the Declaration and Association Bylaws shall provide for
special assessments to cover such necessary costs. There shall be no limit on the amount of such
assessments, and the Declaration and Bylaws shall provide that such special assessments can be made as
necessary at any time.
7. If a wastewater collection system and wastewater treatment and/or disposal facility provided by any city,
town, village, county, water and sewer authorities, or other unit of government shall hereinafter become
available to serve the Development, the DEVELOPER shall take such action as is necessary to cause the
existing and future wastewater of the Development to be accepted and discharged into said governmental
system, and shall convey or transfer as much of the Disposal System and such necessary easements as the
governmental unit may require as condition of accepting the Development's wastewater.
8. Recognizing that it would be contrary to the public interest and to the public health, safety and welfare for
the Association to enter into voluntary dissolution without having made adequate provision for the
continued proper maintenance, repair and operation of its Disposal System, the DEVELOPER shall
provide in the Association Bylaws that the Association shall not enter into voluntary dissolution without
first having transferred its said system and facilities to some person, corporation or other entity acceptable
to and approved by the COMMISSION by the issuance of a permit.
9. The agreements set forth in numbered paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 above shall be conditions of any
permit issued by the COMMISSION to the DEVELOPER for the construction, maintenance, repair and
operation of the Disposal System..
10. A copy of this agreement shall be filed at the Register of Deeds in the County(ies) where the Declaration
is filed and in the offices of the Secretary of State of North Carolina with the Articles of Incorporation of
the Association.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement was executed in duplicate originals by the duly authorized
representative of the parties hereto on the day and year written as indicated by each of the parties named below:
FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION N�EVELOPE
I..
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director (Sigrfature)-/7-- O
Division of Water Quality
Print N&rne and Title
12-12-01
(Date) (Date)
FORM: DEV 10/99 Page 2 of 2

vv.,1�-
Q 9 Michael F. Easley
Governor
Uj r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Re
p ' C Gregory J. horpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
March 26, 2002
MEMORANDUM
4J, I
M419
TO: Membe 8
Envir mental Management Commission'002
FROM:Gregory J. ThorpeA�'
SUBJECT: April 11, 2002 Civil Penalty Remission Committee Meetings
Please be advised that Chairman Moreau has appointed the following members to serve on
the Civil Penalty Remission Committees, which will meet on April 11, 2002, 512 N.
Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. The Committees will convene
immediately following the EMC business session.
Enclosed for your information is the complete agenda package for the Civil Penalty
Remission Committee Meetings.
91h Floor Conference Room - 917
David H. Moreau, Presiding Don Abernethy
Anne C. Barnes Daniel V. Besse
Will B. Fowler Frederick B. Starr
Robert G. Ray E. Leo Green, Jr.
Group II: Ground Floor Hearing Room
Charles H. Peterson, Presiding
Moses Carey, Jr.
Tommy Jenkins
Larry M. Jordan
Marion Deerhake
Reese Lasher
Should you have any questions, please call Jennie H. Odette at [phone]'- Ext. 202
(voice mail) or email [e-mail].
Enclosure r
GJT/jho
cc: Bill Ross Section Chiefs
Frank Crawley Regional Supervisors
cprcm
NCUEM1R
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
1 800 623-7748

AGENDA
ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
GROUP I
512 North Salisbury Street
Archdale Building - Ninth Floor Conference Room - Room 917
Raleigh, North Carolina
April 11, 2002
(Immediately following EMC Business Session)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Executive Order No. One mandates that the Chair inquire as to whether any
member knows of any known conflict of interest or appearance of conflict with
respect to matters before the Commission. If any member knows of a conflict of
interest or appearance of conflict, please so state at this time.
David H. Moreau, Chairman, Presiding
02-01
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$4,000.00
Page # 2
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church (CV 01-007)
IC:
$241.22
Jackson--lc'I�1' 4 lf. _
Remit:
$0.00
02-02
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$4,000.00
Page # 15
Larry W., Owenby (CV 01-012)
IC:
$73.49
Buncombe 0ps s emf Tef T g<ronuk@fi&-e
Remit:
$0.00
02-03
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$5,000.00
Page # 24
Williams Farms (DV 00-029)
IC:
$571.72
Camden — Washington Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-04
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$3,000.00
Page # 46
Belle Toler (DV 01-001)
IC:
$422.50
Craven — Washington Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-05
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$5,500.00
Page # 66
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. (PC 00-082)
IC:
$1,118.40
:
Pender - Wilmington Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-06
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$7,000.00
Page #87
Vision Developers (SS 01-010)
IC:
$329.52
Onslow — Wilmington Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
* Without objection, only one presentation of facts will be heard for entities with multiple cases before the
Committee. Each case will receive a separate decision.
Page 1

AGENDA
ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
GROUP
April 11, 2002
02-07
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$3,400.00
Page'#98
WBW Farms, Inc. (PC 01-014)
IC:
$562.77
Duplin — Wilmington Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-08
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$1,000.00
Page # 121
City of Roxboro (CV 01-002)
IC:
$246.05
Person — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-09
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$4,325.00
Page #130
Town of Princeton (LV 01-228) *
IC:
$41.00
Johnston — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:
$75.00
02-10
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$3,750.00
Page #142
Town of Princeton (LV 01-276) *
IC:
$47.73
Johnston — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-11
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$3,437.50
Page # 154
Town of Princeton (LV 01-344) *
IC:
$47.73
Johnston — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:
$0.00
02-12
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$1,250.00
Page #166
Town of Princeton (LV 01-361) *
IC:
$47.73
Johnston — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:.,..
10.00 ...-..:.-
02-13
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
CP:
$1,500.00
Page # 178
Town of Princeton (PC 01-015) *
IC:
$589.34
Johnston — Raleigh Regional Office
Remit:
- $0.00,
* Without objection, only one presentation of facts will be heard for entities with multiple cases
before the
Committee. Each case will receive a separate decision.
Page 2

CIVIL PENALTY REMISSION COMMITTEE MEETING
OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
GROUP I
512 N. Salisbury Street
Archdale Building — Ninth Floor Conference Room
Raleigh, North Carolina
April 11, 2002
(Immediately following EMC Business Session)

AGENDA ITEM: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church (CV 01-007)
Jackson County
EXPLANATION: On May 18, 2001, Forrest R. Westall, Regional
Supervisor for the Asheville Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality, assessed a civil penalty
of $4,241.22 ($4,000.00 civil penalty and $241.22
investigative costs) against Cornerstone
Presbyterian Church for violation of G.S. 143-
215.1.
On December 31, 2001, Cornerstone Presbyterian
Church requested remission and waived their right
to an administrative hearing and stipulated that the
facts were as alleged in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of. Cornerstone
Presbvterian Church's request for remission
of civil penalties in accordance with G.S.
143-215.6A(f) and his delegation provided
by the secretary and did not find grounds to
modify the assessment.
0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Niichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 18, 2002
Mr. George Paulson
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
70 Trimont View Drive
Franklin, NC 28734
JWAL
NCDENR
NORTH GRouNn DEPARTMENT OF -
ENVIRONMENT AND N.QLRAL RESOURCES
i
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
Jackson County
Case Number CV 01-007
Dear Mr. Paulson:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11,2002 meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 IN. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; r
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions. all
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] S 12 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 2 7699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh. INC 27699-1617
Air Equal Opporrunity l Affirmative Action Employer
?09c recycled / 107c post-eonsunter paper
hrrp://h3o. enr.state.nc. us
3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. George Paulson
70 Trimont View Drive
Franklin, NC 28734
Dear Mr. Paulson:
1 � •
IL
NCDENR
NORrM CARouNA DEPARTMENT of
EhMRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
Jackson County
File No. CV 01-007
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S4,241.22.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty. please make your check
ravable to the Der)artment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of. -
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
t -
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 biail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, forth Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh.. C 27699-1617
An Equal Opporttrnin• /Affirmatire Action Employer
50% reeN•cled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrtp://7r2o. enrstate.nc. its

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time., If a response is, not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Gr ry J Thorpe h:D.
cc: Forrest Westall, Asheville Regional Supervisor
Kevin Barnett, ARO
File T CV 01-007
Central Files
5

L'
o
Ln Pcs:ace ;
- Rece:c =-
=n 'Er-c=-se^ent Pec_ -=c ' "
rl
Q Re57-C!eC Dever.
CM IErcc-sere^t ?ec_ -=c
Q Total Postage & Fees S
M
S Recip' is Name - - =- ,fit . - ze ,.orrr s:
=_
RI
iT /
---------------------------
-? 71
6

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF Macon
File No. CV01-007
IN THE MATTER OF )
Cornerstone Presbyterian )
Church )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
SEWER SYSTEM )
WITHOUT A PERMIT )
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.6A,..
and delegation provided. by the Secretary of the ;Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of Water Quality, I,
Forrest R. Westall., Water Quality Regional Supervisor for the Asheville
Region, hereby make -the following civil penalty assessment against:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Cornerstone Presbyterian Church is a person,. organized and
existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina. .
B. On April 12th and 20t1, 2001, DWQ staff inspected an installed
wastewater pump station to serve the Cornerstone Presbyterian
Church.
C. A search of DWQ records showed that a permit had,not been issued
as of the date of the inspection for the above cited
construction.
D. Cornerstone Presbyterian Church applied for a permit to install
a pump station on February 12th, 2001. Additional information
requests were sent to the applicant on April 5th, and April 27th,
2001.
E. On April 12th, 2001, DWQ staff visited the site while in the area
on another matter and discovered that a pump station had been
installed. The connection pipe was lying on theground adjacent
to the installed pump station. A phone call was placed to the
Church voice mail on that afternoon notifying the applicant that
the construction of the pump station was a violation of North
Carolina General Statutes. The applicant was instructed to
contact the Asheville Regional Office by phone immediately. No
phone call was received from the applicant.
7

F. On April 201h, 2001, DWQ staff visited the site and discovered
that the connecting pipe had been -installed and wastewater had
filled the pump station. Ms. Nann Preston, the Church -secretary;
was contacted and she relayed that the applicant, Mr. George
Paulson, had received the previous phone, message from the
Division of Water Quality relaying that the installation was a
violation of the North Carolina General Statute.
G., A Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement was
mailed to the Mr. Paulson at Cornerstone Presbyterian Church on
April 27`h, 2001 giving ten (10) days to respond. No response
was received.
H. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in
this matter totaled $93.15.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Cornerstone Presbyterian Church is a "person" within the
meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The construction of a wastewater pump station cited in
finding of Fact E above falls within the definition of same
at G.S. 143-213(15)
C. A permit is required for the construction of a wastewater
pump station pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2).
D. Cornerstone Presbyterian Church may be assessed civil
penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which provides
that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand
dollars per violation may be assessed against a person who
is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit
required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Cornerstone Presbyterian Church pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.3(a) (9) and G.S. 14313-282.1(b) (8) .
F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by the Department of Environmental and
Natural Resources and authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A, has
the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
IV

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,
I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church is hereby assessed a civil
penalty of:
$ 4000.00 For failing to apply for or to secure a
permit as required by G.S:' 143-215.1 for
construction of the subject wastewater pump
station.
$ 4000.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is sixteen
percent of the maximum penalty authorized..
by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 241.22 Enforcement costs
$ 4241.22 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the
penalty I considered the factors set out in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which
are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on
air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
m
QYateY
Division of Water Quality
i
0

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I certify that the information in this report is
true to the best of my knowledge. All violations of self -
monitoring data have been verified by hard copy review of
the monthly reports (if applicable) and the appropriate
permit (if applicable).
Signature of Pripcipal Investigator(s):
DATE:
w

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water.Quality
Mchael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. George Paulson
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
70 Trimont View Drive
Franklin, NC 28734
Dear Mr. Paulson:
RCDENR
NORTH CAROL.INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAxuRAL. RESOURCES
January 15, 2002
RE: Remission Request
Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
Macon County
File #CV 01-007
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference qn
April 3, 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Forrest R%estall, Asheville Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Kevin Barnett, ARO w/attachment
Central Files
File # CV 01-007 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 .vigil Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity l A fimiarive Action Emplqyer
30% recycled / 107c post -consumer paper
hrtp.11h2o. en r.srate.nc. us

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF MACON
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGENgL
CORD IISSION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) AD_NI NISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. CV 01-007
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S4.241.22 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Divison of Water Quality, Water
Quality Regional Supervisor for the Asheville Region dated _ ' May 18, 2001 , the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged
in the assessment document.
This the PM;� 3 , day of D E G , 2001.
'JSIG- ATLT E for Cornerstone J
Presbyterian Church
ADDRESS
70 Trimont View Drive
Franklin. NC 28734
TELEPHONE
3& el— 5_22�f
/a
w

GTE RA LAw Fnam, P. A.
29 IOTZ&
F ALYKIMT, NOBTS CA8OZn;A 2873.1
30EITcr I CT- ux
June 18, 2001
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604-1148
Re: Cornerstone Presbyterian Church
Franklin, NC 28734
File CV01-007
Dear Mr. Lewis:
T=MPxO_--M 828-524r8888
FA X; 828-389-2087
Please accept this letter as a waiver of the right of Cornerstone to request an
administrative appeal or review of the enforcement action but also as a request
for remission or mitigation of the fines imposed. For your reference,;l am
enclosing a copy of Mr. Westall's letter of May 18, 2001.
This matter involves the installation of a pumping station and connecting to the
sewer line of the Town of Franklin with out proper permits. While. I do want an
opportunity to supplement this request, the grounds for the request for remission.
or mitigation are as follows:
1) Cornerstone hired an engineer, a licensed contractor with many years of
experience, applied for the permits and cooperated with the agency in the
process of gaining approval. Cornerstone may have acted prematurely in
connecting but did not do so intentionally but rather relied upon those experts
that had been hired to assist in the completion of the job.
2) Cornerstone acted to alleviate another problem, a leaking, defective septic
tank and thereby cured another environmental problem. ,
3) The people responsible for representing Cornerstone are volunteers, not
familiar with this process and not always on the job site and therefore, rhore
dependent on the advice of contractors to proceed.
4) No environmental damage resulted from the action.
5) No funds will be expended to rectify any damage.
6) There has been no adverse water or air impact.
�3

Mr. Steve Lewis
June 18, 2001
Page 2
7) Cornerstone has not violated any program or regulation of the EMC in the
past.
8) There should be no additional cost for enforcement
As I indicated earlier in my letter, we want to submit additional information in
making this request. While not minimizing the actions of the elders of the church
or the representatives of that group in proceeding with the installation of the
pumping station, it is our opinion that the fine is too large and should be adjusted
to the minimum amount allowed by law.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
V ery,Vuly ycyGrs
L. Clark

AGENDA ITEM: 62.1 - Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Larry W. Owenby(CV 01-012)
Buncombe County
EXPLANATION: On November 16, 2001, the Asheville Regional
Supervisor assessed a civil penalty of $4,073.39
($4,000.00 civil penalty and $73.49 investigative
costs) against Larry W. Owenby for violations of
G.S. 143-215.1. The civil penalty assessment
represents 40 percent of the maximum allowed by
G.S. 143-215.6A.
On December 18, 2001, Mr. LgM W. Owenby
requested remission and waived Larry W.
Owenby's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in Larry W. Owenbyrequest for
remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his delegation
provided by the secretary and did not find
grounds to modify the assessment.

12/21/2001 013:59 4
PAGE 01
A"�c,
NCC
^.11)rfh Carolina Department of Er
P -Ir Fax Note 7671
�,r i
�,y!;:;►
To �
Fr
CoJDW.
r:n.
Phon9 ♦
Minnn N
Fax r
Fun
'Villiwn (;. Runs, ,ir.• 5.�� rc�;ar,
Gregory .1. ,nwrlx. Th. i
)
Acting Dircclnr
DiVi,a•+n of Wawr r)uaiil�:
('1':lt'!'1HE'D MAIL
RPTURN_RE('!' HIT REQUESTED
WATER QUALITY SECTION
November 16, 2001
Mr. L,i rry w . C)wc-.,nby
9(; S',irtt-! Crtn t Circle
>:a i.rvtc:w, No r-1.1i Carolina 28730
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penaities for
VIOLATION OF North Carolina General Stat.ut_ O!;
Article 21 A, Part t, Sertion 143-215:1
Construction of Seweragc Sy^t_em Without. Permi.-
Case Number CV 01-017
Buncombe County
nNat- Mr. Uw(�rlr)y:
notice of a civil penalty assessed against Larry -W.
UwQ:'_`-!y, Uwru>r and Developer in the amount of $4073.39 which includes
:; l3. ? in invr_•;;LJ.gar,-Lve costs. Attached is a copy of the a55t:'.:;: rrrPnl
do(-umr�rll c:xpl ai ning this penalty.
Thi.:-s oc.l. i cirl was taken under the authority vested in me by delegaL-ic.-jn
pr ovidod by t-heu- Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
C2r:;irur'r.,(--- - . Arry continuing violation (s) may be the subject . of a new
r?I1Lr: r'c;:r�rue-nr. action, including an additional penalty.
1
Wi.r.hin thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one
firl r.f:r foL Lowiny.
L. Submit payment of the penalty:
1':ryrnwil. :.hi.)uld be -made directly to the order of the
L)c par.-l.mc:.rtl.. of. Environment and Natural Resources (do not
lshevalc ltc;.r,mal (Khan., S9 Wnudfin Place, Asheville. North Caroline 28801 Phone. 82R'251-6208 E'az 828/2il-645=
\n I:yual l )PPurunrly/AtTrrtmtive Adios Eaployer - 50% Recycledll 1 MI. Post t: onswmr Park-r

I
1�C111�� �alv r e 0.137l , Pd ymen t of the penalty wi I1 nrD c
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or -
new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a w=:Ltten request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such requests
A request for remission or mitigation is 1imitv(J to
cunside.ration of the reasonableness of the amourit. ref t.tir. perU-11ty
and is not the proper procedure for contesting t:hE_ auc:urzu:y of'
any of the statements contained in the assc_ta::rnent lC.t t.Fr
Because a remission request forecloses the oprAo:i ul, :1n
administrative hearing,, such a request must be au(:omparr i eel by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing ,, nd c,
stipulation that there are no factual or legal i.in
dispute. You must execute and return t:o t.})is off.ivc, the_,
attached waiver and stipulation form and a det.ci i 7 ed
which you believe establishes whether:
(a) orie or more of the civil penalty assessment. fact,().-s in. (:. S _
1 4313-282.1 (b) were wrongfully applied to ttiei do t..r imerrt. of.
the petitioner;
(b) the violar_or promptly abated contirluirig e-r_v i r-onrriciritai
damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a ,result of are accirif--nt.;
W) the violator had been assessed civil pernali.. it s f(-): any
previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent paymarir: Lor the:
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Plcase submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
Ashcvil]c Regional Oflicc, 59 Wtxxitin Pluce, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone: [phone]ZOR F.m. KnS/251 (Ail
An Equul Oprxirtunivy, A r active Action Employer - S(W. RR.ycled\] I0% Post Omsunkr Papa
Z0 3E)Vd
b 65:80 T00Z/1Z/ZI

12/21/2001 08:59 4 PAGE 03
3. Submit a written request for 4= achninistrative ]nearing:
11. you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty
you must request an administrative hearing_ This
rrquost must be in the form of a written petition to Lhe Office
ui Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 15UB of.
the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your
original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr- Dan Oakley
NCDDNR
O£Fice of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Re 1 e igh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as
ev i cit:!nc ed by ,3 date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received
ived
your response, will result in this matter being referred to the Attorney.
Ccrc_•ral-' s Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect_ the
penal t_v _ Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied l cr
fi,r.i, r-f-t v i-c.�..a1..io;�s, which occur after the review period of this assessment.
if you havE' orty questions, please 'contact Max L. Haner at [phone].
Sincerely,
r
Foxiest R. Westall
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
ATTACUMLNTS
C-C: F i Le CV01 012 w/ attachments
Vilos w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments
Asheville Rc: ional Office. �9 Wocxlfin place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Phone. [phone] Fax: 828/251-fr153
%n Equal Oppcutuniry/Affmucive Action EM toyer — 30% Recycled\l 1016 Pwt Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLTNA NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMIT: t ION
IN THE MATTER OF
LARRY W. OWENBY, DEVELOPER
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
SEWER SYSTEM WITHOUT
A PERMIT
File No. CV 01 012
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
ES
Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) t 4 3
215.6A, I, Forrest R. Westall, Water Quality Regional '
Supervisor, of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
iollowing:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Larry W. Owenby is owner and developer- of
approximately 1.2 acres of land with an addr-ei s of
144 Baldwin Road, Arden, N.C. in the Limestbrnc_
Section of Buncombe County.
B. On October 12, 2001, DWQ staff observed that.
approximately 200 L.F. of 6-inch sewer line,(sew-ctr
system) had been constructed to serve a �'i
mobile home park at 144 Baldwin Road in Bune:e�eutxe
County.
C. A search of DWQ records showed that a permit had
neither been applied for nor issued a.%, of. rhr. d3 r.c-:
of the inspection for the above -cited construction.
D. The costs to the State of the enforcement
procedures in this matter totaled $73.39.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the fcA lowiric}: ,
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Larry W_ owenby is a "person" within the meaning olf
G.S. 143-215.6 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
A . The sewer system cited in finding of Fact S above
fall.-:-. within the definition of same al_ G.S_ 1,13
213 (15) .
00 39Vd /ff b 65:80 T00Z/1Z/Z1

12/21/2001 08:59 4
PACE 05
C. A permit is required for the construction of a
sewer system pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1(a)(2).
D_ Larry W. Owenby may be assessed civil penalties
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which provides
that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars.per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required but fails to apply for or to
secure a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
E_ The States enforcement costs in this matter may be
assessed against Larry N. Owenby pursuant to G.S.
143--215.3 (a) (9) and G.S. 143B-282.1 (b) (8) .
F. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant
to delegation authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A(h),
has the authority to assess civil penalties in
this matter.
Ra:3ed upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions
oL Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION;
liarry W_ Owenby is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
DD For failing to apply for or, to
secure a permit as required' by G.S.
143 -215. 1 for construction of the
subject sewer system.
$-4
$ 7.3.39
.¢-C-2 7_3
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
ao

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c) , in determining r.he amount. of
the penalty I considered the factors set out in G.S. 1.4313-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resourceu
of the State, to the public health, or to pri.vat_r_ >
property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or
quality or on air quality;
(4 ) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(5) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or tail.iru:3
to comply with programs over which the Envi.ronme!ntal
Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(F;) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) ebrrest A. Westall
water Quality Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
o? /
90 3SVd b 65:80 100Z/TZ/Zi

c! ^^
Mr. Steve Lewis
Division of Water Qua
Carolina lity
Environment and Resources 9e CoTy,�FC�
1617 Mail Service Center �P/*CL. /v
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 160f
RE: Response to Assessment
of Civil Penalties
Case Number CV-01-012
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
This letter serves as official response to a letter from your department dated November 16,
2001. The letter assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $4,073.39 for violation of the North Carolina
General Statutes involving construction of a sewerage system without a permit.
I do not contest the factual or legal issues in this case and furthermore enclose the required
waiver and stipulation form. I do, however, request remission of the penalty due to the following
circumstances:
1. The illegal sewerage system installed was not placed in use and therefore did not create any
undue environmental hazard.
2. The sewerage system is considered private, which I was unaware required a permit from your
office. This project also involved a public wastewater collection system, for which I received a
permit from the Metropolitan Sewerage District (MSD). I subsequently constructed this system
and transferred ownership to the MSD. This public system involved an investment of
approximately $18,000 on my part, which represents a considerable investment in the extension
of a utility for the public good.
3. I have endeavored to take steps to resolve this matter by applying for the necessary private
sewer system permit. In fact, I am enclosing copies of the permit application and "As -Built"
drawings demonstrating my efforts to comply with the regulations. My official request for a
private sewer system permit is being sent to the Division under separate cover.
Please consider the above facts as mitigating circumstances on my behalf in hopes of reducing
or avoiding any monetary penalties. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate giving me a call
at 828-684-1550.
Enclosures
cc: Forrest Westall
Max Hamer
Sincerely,
C::�� alve4
Larry Owenby
as

12/12.'2001 09:39 4
PAGE 01
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY Or BUNCOMLAE
IN 'i'l1r, MATTER OF ASSESSMENT )
OP CIVIL Pr-W. ALTIE;S AGAINST )
LARRY W . OWENBY )
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SEWER )
SY.STE;M W I THOiTT A PERMIT
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
File No. CV 01-012
Having been
assessed
civil penalties totaling $
4,073.39 for
violativri (s.) as set;
forth in the assessment document of
the Division
of Water Quality dated
November 16, 2001, the undersigned, desiring to
seek r-c-mission of
the civil
penalties, does hereby waive
the right to
All admiriist:rative
hearing
in the above -stated, matter
and does
::r i.puiat.c: l.hat the
facts are
as alleged in the assessment
document.
ThiS tho
day of
IF 2001.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
a3 12/12/2001 WED 09:36 (Ts/R% NO 60781 IM001

AGENDA ITEM: 69- 03 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. (DV 00-029)
Camden Countv
EXPLANATION: On Oct. 30, 2001, Jeffrey O. Poupart, Supervisor of
the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
Unit of the Division of Water Quality, assessed a
civil penalty of $5,571.72 (S5,000.00 civil penalty
and $571.72 investigative costs) against Williams
Farms (registered owner of Belcross Farm) for
violation of G.S. 143-215.1.
RECOMLIIN-DATION:
On December 17, 2001, Northeast Carolina Farms.
Inc., the lessee of Belcross Farm, requested
remission and waived their right to an
administrative hearing and stipulated that the facts
were as alleged in the assessment document.
The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Northeast Carolina
Farm's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and his delegation provided by the
secretary and did not find wounds to modify
the assessment. r
r
a1.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 15, 2002
1 � •
NCDENR-
NaR7,m CJ1RouNA DEPAwn4E T OP
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RESOURCES
Dr. Fred Cunningham CERTIFIED MAIL
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Belcross Farm
Camden County
Case Number DV 01-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. I (b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Flail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h?o. enr.state.nc.us
aIS

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $5,571.72 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Office
File DV 01-029
Sincerely,
.5-12 �-- X�-'
Steven C. Lewis
a,.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
ldichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunnineham :
i • •
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERT=D MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm
Farm TM 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S5,571.72.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
ravable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
IN-Ir. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Ralei_h. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier=52-01-01
An Equal Oppor-uniry IArTtrntcrire Action Enrplo_yer
?O�c ren•cled / 10�c post -consumer paper
hrtp: //h?o. enr. srare. n e. its
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleieh. NC 27699-1617
a7

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
N CGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
cc: Jim Llulli-an. Washington Regional Supervisor
Daphne Cullom, WARO
Lyn Hardison. `VARO
File r DV 00-029
Central Files
Sincerely,
t
',

11
u�
----------------------------
--a , -
=---------------- --. . . =_ =
37 T a
Q
C sae_ { 86elscd lelol
O
L✓
-= -_�_t :ca�as.n❑-=
ISM
-
a
L^1
1+

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc.
Post Office Box 416
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Sirs:
1 � •
NCDENFZ
Ncmr t:-ARouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 31, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making a Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit
Farm ? 15-11
Camden County
File No. DV 00-029
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Belcross Farm in the
amount of S5,571.72 which includes S571.72 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include n-aiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s). '
r
_flailing ,address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporunin• /:1f rmarive Action Employer
50% recycled / I0S'c pose -consumer paper
hrrp://h'o. enr srate.nc.us

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
W
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation:
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
No
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of :administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:
31

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact N1r. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
effrey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACI-LI-IENI S
cc: Jim I'vIullizan. Washington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Cul
lom. llom. WARD w•/ attachments
Lvn Hardison. W ARO w/ attachments
File # DV 00-029 w/ attachments
Central Files w-/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments r
3A

s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CA_MDEN
EN VIRONMENT'AL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
P; THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL. PENALTIES'AGALtiST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-029
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S5.571.72 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
day of
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
2001.
TELEPHONE '

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF )
WILLIAMS FARMS OF )
NORTH CAROLINA, INC. )
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE )
WATERS OF THE STATE OF )
NORTH CAROLINA )
WITHOUT A PERMIT AND )
VIOLATION OF GENERAL PERMIT )
AWG 100000 )
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-029
FINDINGS AND DECISION
A1vD ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Actin; pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FLN-DLI;GS OF FACT:
A. Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc. C Williams Farms) is a corporation
organized and existins under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Williams Farms owns and operates Belcross Farm, a swine operation located
along US Highway 158 in Camden County.
C. Williams Farms was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS 150011 under General
Permit AWG100000 for Belcross Farm on April 2, 1999, effective April 1 1999,
with an expiration date of April 30, 2003. This permit does not allow the
discharge of waste to waters of the State.
D. On. October 3, 2000, D`VQ staff observed evidence that a discharge of wastewater
by Belcross Farm from a lift station had reached an unnamed tributary of
Indiantown Creek, which are Class C Sw waters of the State w•ithinJ the
Pasquotank River Basin.
E. Williams Farms had no valid permit for the above -described activity.
3V

F. Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit requires in part that the Permittee
shall report by telephone -to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible,
but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge :of the occurrence of
any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the
facility incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste.
G. Williams Farms failed to notify DWQ of the failure of the animal waste treatment
and disposal system within the required 24 hours after discovery.
H. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $571.72.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
U. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Williams Farms is a "person" within the meaning of G.S.-143=215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 1-43-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Indiantown Creek constitutes waters of the State within
the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. The above -cited failure to report the failure of the waste treatment system violated
Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit.
E. Williams Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not; more than twenty-
five thousand dollars (S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
F. Williams Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not :more than twenty-
five thousand dollars (S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions. or requirements of a
permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed asainse'vVilliams
Farms pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
­3_�7

"11
H. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly, Williams Farms is hereby assessed a civil penalty of-
$ 0V for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ ���% for violating Condition No. 11. 6. b. of the General Permit
by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any
failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system
that renders the facility incapable of adequately receiving,
treating or storing the animal waste
S 571.72 Enforcement costs
S s7% TOTAL MOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-216.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation.
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality:
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental -lanasement Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
1
(Date) rrev O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
e
-36-

Of
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
earns m ,NC l AC,
�a 4-50�t- Lug
A_ Received by (Please Print ClYJ, I B.
C.
Agent
is delivery address different from item 17
ff YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
r *� p 31..Sgrvice Type
1t) vC�k- 1 v 0 12.Cettified Mail 0 Express Mail
❑ Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article� ember (Copy from service labeo
PS Form 3811, .lu(iy 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-WM-0952
a
CO
Ln
L
Q Resc-:c:e= =s
0 Total Postage a Fees 5 r
'-' Recipient's Yame - - - - -
.... l L►.
e� DO if fU\
Q
l7
rr-
rr
317

3r ; v� I •y ` ` _
"i��, �'.��' _fir. #"C' ��ai�\� � _ � ••/c- __ :iwz M'--
WN
!� ` .�j, �J% -Y/fit ! Gmµ i. �Y Y .. � • .i •�-
S�uC1-
1 r -� �` �r�� `sue c� ��'''�"��r�`,�" �"'•'�$��.....,T� 1 `_. � '�• ,-
rt '
NI

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
i 0 IT •
NCDENR
NoRTM CARouw► DEPARTME r of
ENVIRONMENT AND NA7uRAL RFSs RCS
'December 19, 2001
RE: Remission Request
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
s�Z' 4,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Lyn Hardison, WARD w/attachment
Daphne Cullom, WARO w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 00-029 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Llail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-0I-01
An Equal Opportunity /Affirnratiye .action Employer
50% renrled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrrp://h2o. enr.state. nc. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
31

Northeast Carolina Farms. Inc.
P. O. Box 865, Moyock, NC 27958
� [phone] office(252)435-2387 fax
December 10, 2001
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR, DWQ
1671 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Lewis,
a r • j .tcs f
DEC 17 22Oi i
WATE-'. QUALITY SECTION
Non -Discharge Compliance Ent
In reference to File No. DV 00-029, farm #15-11 we are requesting remission or mitigation of the proposed fine.
This problem occurred due to the failure of a pump in the lift station, which caused the lift station to overflow. The pipe
that was installed at the request of the local conservation department, located next to the lift station had already been
cemented shut prior to this incident. This was done so if the lift station failed no waste would escape from between the
buildings. Your sample indicates there was an increased Coliform count where this pipe would have entered the ditch.
Since the pipe had been cemented shut we did not consider the possibility waste could reach the ditch.
Since the inspection we have spent over 56000.00 redesigning the lift station system. We have designed and
installed a special pump that uses a boat propeller to move both wastewater and solids to the lagoon. We have installed
an additional pump that serves as a back up to the primary pump and is tied to an alarm that sounds inside the buildings
when the second pump turns on but before there is a problem.
In addition the site between the buildings has had the top 12 inches of soil removed and composted. It has been
replaced with soil and sand. The farm has been inspected twice since this incident and passed with no problems. The
pipe that leads -to the ditch has been dug up completely eliminating the possibility of any future problems.
I would propose to use the money that would be due for the fine to install water nipples in the gestation building
that is the primary water source for this lift station. We have done this on three farms in the Gaston, NC area at a cost of
S15.000. This has cut our water usage in half and made lagoon management much easier and more able to be planned. I
have included a copy of the bill for the first set of equipment excluding labor cost for the water nipples. I would estimate
that it would cost S10 per gestation crate to buy and install water nipples. This building has approximately 550 gestation
crates, which would make the cost S5500.00. The ultimate plan would be to install nipples in the breeding building, which
flows directly to the lagoon, but that would require an additional 55000 and cash flow would not allow that at this time.
I have enclosed three pictures of the area in question. Picture #1 is of the general area. You can see the primary
pump, which consists, on a five horsepower electric pump that drives a shaft with a propeller attached. It is a 6-inch pipe
that contains the propeller. This pump has been very effective in not getting clogged with the solid waste from the `
buildings. The area around the lift station is clean and dry.
Picture #2 is of the primary pump. Picture #3 is of the primary pump in the lift station, along with the back up pump in
place. This pump is automatically activated if the level of the lift station exceeds the safe level of the primary pump. An
alarm is also activated when this pump is energized.
� r
We certainly did not design this system but inherited it when we leased the farm. We have already invested a lot
of money on clean up and improvements so that the system can operate properly and efficiently. I hope you will let us
invest additional money in improvements instead of a fine. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Fred L. Cunningham Ms. DVM
yb

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #1 Lift Station Area - Primary Pump in Place
L/l

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #2 Primary Pump
r
r
ya

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #3 Primary Pump Pipe - Back Up Pump Hooked to Alarm
r
d
y3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CA'VSDEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVU_ PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AIN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 55.571.72 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30. 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of ;)e L.e sL fj ,e_ Y , 2001.
-z�iz- �u/rr
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
4U

J.
12/10/2001 12:25 2524352.387
G & M SALES OF EASTERN N.C., lINC.
@611
YO .Ge: 7ha 3es: Phi CovRsoas Santa At GdM Saba'xiari� :DtAw•YJi
7E
W14CLESALE WSTRIBUTORS ZOo i22-AW
7a3 740tj$TF1Y CCuAT FAA • :912; 73-M09
CaOLOS80ii0. N_C. 275C Pn:9.. tD1a t•xra
- /p:. •.r tgtq try.-27G0
PEASE REMIT TO: P.O. BOX 1716 - GOLDSBORO. r!C 27533-1716
SOLD
TO
North East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Cunningham
Po box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
M8072 t 11/27/00 023200 101 '. IDS 1238072RH
130G..e0ee
1000. 4)000
1000.0000
2000.0000
20. F700�
2000.00D9
400$.00©@
1!309. 0600
2 �i00. 0000
�a.Oae3
1b0.004i0
�A _r 01
d a' r
AET'JRN azu""Ar10E COPY VnTM
►AY.6•NT TO 04SUR[_ PROPER CAQOtT
TC 70Jm ACCOU19T
TERMS: NET 15 DAYS
SHIP
TO
North East Forms
c/o Dr. Fred Cunningham
Po Box 865
Hoyock. NC 27958
INSTALL
i000.0800166..12X36G
2.000000[EA
Nipple. 1/2" x36" Galvanized
100�3. 0001a : 99.3510 i 1
. 615000;
EA
EElbow. 90o-1/2" Galvanized
J.P. War d
1000.0000;525.12517
2.800000lEA
Waterer. Niaple *75
2090. 0000 ; 207. RC12
1. 240000;
EA
Clarla. ' 1/2" Conduit
29.0080 99. 4.1@11
3.e70000� EA
'Pi" Dope -1/4 pt.
2;330.0td�0 94.32
.300000. EA
Claj+c-; Hcse 4l2
c009. 00�Ci3 � 167r?. 2757
.480000�
FT
jHc*e. -3/4" Green Wator.2509/rl
i
1000.0300;9999077
.350000EA
I Tei-. PVC 3/4". SxSxFT'-
i09�+. a$00:
99;y7'7551
.1400001
EA
Ada-g.ter. Nylon-Insert-M-Pipe
40. OOZE)1
99. 351107
.750ZOO
EA
!Tee. Galvanized 1/2" JP
Ward
lod.30001525.13774
i.4600001EA
I Li -Bolt. w/Nut Pka
FEB 0 7 2001
#COC RATE W 1 1-21
M IYPtT"OR AA AM ..
:ACERIAM RATE,
!R S
ow. DeAMAM TO T!7! J'CESoS IS NEVER FINAL....
,&Vf-"ugwr.- PTjT FAILURE CAN BE-
3D Aw PArYEATS OA
avr3" Two CLXIWNT , }l_t. AYS TRY. TRY AGAIN.
wrN -, Wwroot FtNAwce I
WiGE tf _09 I
L CLAWS WSr ea W/6I7E TERMS
TM" 9 CA"3. Fq=25 N L. t 15
iy£C - TO C.ANGE W!n-
tT M7'tL E
CUSTOMER COPY
PD%
2.000.00
615.00
2.830.00
480. 00
61.40
6Be. 00 - .
1. 920. 00
330.00
30.00
233.60
SALE AYOU'T
LABOR CHARGES
3.250.00
j FREIGHT
SALMES TAX
TOTAL
6 7 3. 80
AMOUNT RECEIVED
15. 153. f30
BALANCE DUE
• 00

06�
AGENDA ITEM: a- Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Belle Toler (DV 01-001)
Craven County
EXPLANATION: On October 30, 2001, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of
the Division of Water Quality, assessed a civil
penalty of $3,422.50 ($3,000.00 civil penalty and
$422.50 investigative costs) against Belle Toler for
violation of G.S. 143-215.1.
On November 28, 2001, Belle Toler requested
remission and waived her right to an administrative
hearing and stipulated that the facts were as alleged
in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Belle Toler's request
for remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his delegation
provided by the secretary and did not find
grounds to modify the assessment.
r
410

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
N11chael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 18, 2002
Mrs. Belle Toler
2760 Aurora Road
Ernul, NC 28527
" 4 •06
•
NCDER�R
NORTH GROL)MA DEPARTMENT OF
ENIAROMMENT AMC) NRuRAL Ftr 0 RCE.S
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Belle Toler Farm
Craven County
Case Number DV 01-001
Dear Mrs. Toler:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental 'vlanac ement Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. ' The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil.Penalty Remissions are whether.
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Mailing address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Ralei,h, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporrunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
hrrp://h2o. enrstate. nc. us
`/

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $3,422.50 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of.
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim.NIulligan, Washington Regional Office -
File DV 01-001
i
M.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mrs. Belle Toler
2760 Aurora Road
Ernul, NC 28527
Dear Mrs. Toler:
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH GROuwn DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIROMMENT AND N.4uRA ftmouRCES
October 31, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Violations of General Permit
Farm # 25-22
Craven County
File No. DV 01-001
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against the Belle Toler Farm in the
amount of S3,422.50 which includes S422.50 in investigative costs. Attached, is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of 'a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
r
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporrunin' /Affirmative Action Employer
50% rec3-cled / 10% post -consumer paper
htrp.11h2o. enr.state.nc. its
Yy

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
W
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. I (b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
W
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:
�v

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within the days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result, in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at (919) 733.-5083, ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Daphne Cullom, WARO w/ attachments
Lyn Hardison, WARO w/attachments
File:#DV 01:001 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments
15'/

A
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMIMIISSION
COUNTY OF CRAVEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. AWG 100000 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE, NO. DV 01-001
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 53.422.50 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
9.I
e
TELEPHONE �
� a'

AL
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL. RESOURCES
COUNTY OF CRAVEN
File No. DV 01-001
IN THE MATTER OF )
BELLE TOLER )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONDITIONS ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
OF ANDv AL WASTE PERMIT ) CIVIL PENALTIES
AWG 100000 )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FLN-DD GS OF FACT:
A. Belle Toler owns and operates the Belle Toler Farm, a swine operation located
along Hill Neck Road in Craven County.
B. BeIle Toler was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS250022 under General Permit
AWG100000 for the Belle Toler Farm on October 29, 1999, effective October 29,
1999, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003.
C. Condition No. I. 2. of the issued permit states in part that the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) is incorporated by reference into the General
Permit and that any violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of
the General Permit and subject to enforcement actions.
D. A waste utilization plan (WUP) is a required component of an animal waste
management plan in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C(e). Item #8 of the 'VUP
for the Belle Toler Farm states that "Animal waste shall not be applied to
saturated soils, during rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen." ,
E. On November 14, 2000. in response to a complaint, DWQ staff inspected the
Belle Toler Farm and observed that animal waste was being applied. The area had
received approximately one-fourth (1/4) inch of rain on that day and a drizzle was
continuing at the time that application was observed. Staff observed waste
ponded as deep as six (6) inches in some areas of the spray field.
63

J
F. Condition No. I. 1. of the issued permit states in part the animal waste collection,
treatment, storage and application system shall be effectively maintained and
operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of pollutants to
surface waters, wetlands, or ditches.
G. During the November 14, 2000 inspection, DWQ staff observed that a cap on a
sprinkler riser in the spray field was loose and that wastewater was ponded in the
field near the riser. Staff observed wastewater discharging from the spray field
and entering a roadside ditch. Staff observed that the wastewater flowed under
the road via a culvert to a ditch that flowed towards a neighboring home. Staff
observed that wastewater was pooled in the backyard of the neighboring home.
H. Condition No. III. 6.. b. of the General Permit requires in part that the Permittee
shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible,
but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of
any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the
facility incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste.
I. Belle Toler failed to notify DWQ of the discharge of wastewater within the
required 24 hours after discovery. .
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $422.50.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
Ii. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Belle Toler is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S.
143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited application of animal waste during a rain event violated
Condition No. I. 2. of the General Permit.
D. The above -cited discharge from the spray field due to the loose riser cap violated
Condition No. I. 1 of the General Permit.
E. The above -cited failure to report the failure of the waste treatment system violated
Condition No. 111. 6. b. of the General Permit.
F. Belle Toler may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2). which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars (S 10,000.00). per violation may be assessed against a person who fails to
act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required
by G.S. 143-215.1.

u
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Belle Toler
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b)(8).
H. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and 'Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly, .Belle Toler is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 1000 .-,* for violating Condition No. I. 2. of the General Permit by
applying animal waste during a rain event
$ 1000. for violating Condition No. L 1. of the. General Permit by
failing to effectively maintain and operate the waste
application system as a non -discharge system to prevent the
discharge of pollutants to surface waters, wetlands, or
ditches
$ 101U r for violating Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit
$ 422.50
s 3 y22-so
by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours following first knowledge of the failure of the waste
treatment system
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation:
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage:
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
55

(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures_
357 OCT- D/
(Date) rey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
56

A
■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Rem 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
A. -RI
C. i
x
D. Is
1. Article Addressed to:
a."1�OC'� �ROQQ—�CC
1
3. S
r,
by (Pleasp, Print Clearly) LA Date f Delivery
, vv- % �/,, ^c /// 5.d,
❑ Agent
�y ad�ress (TOGent from Fitem 11 ❑ Yes
enter delivery address below: ❑ No
Type
fled ail Express Mail
ste etum Receipt for Merchandise
Mail ❑ C.O.D.
ed Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
PS Form 3811, July 1 g99 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952
• r. r -
•. i • -
Ln Fc=_:ace I S '
ri -
S Cert:`e_ =
� --
met :rn Rece c: Fee
trl •E-c:,ser ent Rec_ rec`
p Res-ncted Delwe = I ,
Q
'Ecccrse,,,ent Rec_sec;
t3 Total Postage & Fees
S Recip. is N e Pea '- - :c ce ccr-c exec c-
r" -------------------- ----- :.
, 'c.
Er a7o.--
0 I C =:e. ZIP-' a
„.
51

It
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mrs. Belle Toler
2760 Aurora Road
Ernul, NC 28527
Dear Mrs. Toler:
1 • •
10
AMEMMO Xk
NCDENR
bkxwH GRouNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENviRONMENT AND N/VURAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belle Toler Farm
Farm # 25-22
Craven County
File No. DV 01-001
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of $3,422.50.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
.13, -
.Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Ser%ice Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleish. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier *52-01-01 Raleish, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Eniployer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http.11h2o. enr.state.nc. us
6 W

1
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time.': If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
Lyn Hardison, WARO
Daphne Cullom, WARO
File # DV 01-001
Central Files
�y

r,- -
m
o
i
L7 Postage j S
.9 i
S Certified Fee
Postma S
Return; Receipt Fee Here
marl (Endorsen-ent Required ,
rl
Q Restricted Delivery Fee
0 (Endorse^ent Require,.)
O Total Postage &Fees ' S
O
S Rocipie 's N e ,F.'eas- " .ea- :- ,,c ^ompleted a.••e•:
m---------i �;--�-- -- ------ ----------------_----
��ba i�tic
-- ----- --- --- -
p Cary. S'z-e. Z(Pa � r � �� .
r J
(,0

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Ms. Belle Toler
2760 Aurora Road
Ernul, NC 28527
Dear Ms. Toler:
5�'r
1 • •
NCDENR
NORTH CARou" DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NAUtNtAL RESOURCES
December 4, 2001
RE: Remission Request
Belle Toler Farm
Farm # 25-22
Craven County
File #DV 01-001
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against your farm. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in January
2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If you have
any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Daphne Cullom, WARO w/attachment
Lyn Hardison, WARO w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 01-001 w/ 3 attachments
.Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 LSail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Afarmative Action Emplover
50% recycled / ]O% post -consumer paper
http.P7z2o. enr.state.nc. its

y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIR0NMBNTAL MANAGEMENT
CONLVIISSION
COUNTY OF CRAVEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVII. PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADIMIINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. AWG100000 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 01-001
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $3,422.50 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the 19 day of nJ o U E 2001
GNATURE
ADDRESS
1 Lr 0 I _CIL
TELEPHONE
SO
So, I'i
Fri
03

.Mr ."d ►� � �;v s t 1 i" �..
� e.�dti W ��, -, k►� �.._►' S`i�`t ��%ri T �, .f'Z�l�"•�i i '
t- ' ? /. Tit-
A.r` K S. �/4 y �,I� sir. • '
�_���}.. J -•Try

t r.
�r per} •r;, J ��•,��� �L�� u -�� '
+S Cl�lnl �# \V �'��:.; . A_'" {f �i�`• I '1►\�J�, •w!c 1`, �_ r '1....
* r2l 14 Owl
tj
YAW
f .�� �t .1 it���Jj���,- Its �t a• ��1� ,� � � 1 � /
y J �. tit � t •` ;. •� �' ,.;

9L
AGENDA ITEM: 2' os Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. (PC 00-082)
Pender County
EXPLANATION: On October 30, 2001, Jeffrey O. Poupart,
Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and
Enforcement Unit of the Division of Water Quality,
assessed a civil penalty of $6,618.40 ($5,500.00
civil penalty and $1,118.40 investigative costs)
against Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. for violation of
G.S. 143-215.1.
On December 7, 2001, Lewis Sausage Co., Inc.
requested remission and waived their right to an
administrative hearing and stipulated that the facts
were as alleged in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Lewis Sausage Co.,
Inc.'s request for remission of civil penalties
in accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and
his delegation provided by the secretary and
did not find grounds to modify the
assessment.
rN

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 18, 2002
Mr. Ed Hardy, President
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc.
Post Office Box 1296
1050 Old Savannah Road
Burgaw, NC 28425
A
• •
NCDENR
Nearr+ CAACUw. �iu�TF9:+T of
Ei+mRoHMExr Amo N.4URAL Rm3OURcrs
CERTIFEF,D MAII.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc.
Pender County
Case Number PC 00-082
Dear Mr. Hardy:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Buildina, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions. ,^
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fa.-, [phone] 512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleiah. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Ralei-h. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrtp://h2o. enr.state. nc. us
01

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $6,618.40 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of.
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Office
File PC 00-082
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
63

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
1,iichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Ed Hardy
Lewis Sausage Company, Inc.
Post Office Box 1296
Burgaw, NC 28425
Dear Mr. Hardy:
1 •
NCDENR
NoRT CARouMA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NAruRAL RFSSOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAEL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Permit No. WQ0001949
Pender County
File No. PC 00-082
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of S6,618.40.
There are two options available to you. You may pav the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty. Remissions of the
Environmental tilanasement Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
t)avable to the Det)artment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
.Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier 452-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity I.-1frrmatire Action Employer
509c recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
htrp:117z2 o. enr state. nc. its
6y

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that -your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Ed Beck, WIRO
File # PC 00-082
Central Files
rJ0

nu
ru
M
UI
Postage S
Certified Fee
-M
Ln
Return Receipt Fee
1-1
(Endorsement Required)
M
Restricted Delivery Fee
r_3
(Enckxsernwt Required)
pof 66 0
Pos--nark
Here
MO Total Postage & F. I $ I j
ion ' Na !eas Tint Cleary/ !to be competed by mailer;
M . I '.
----- .... . ---Sbeer Apt' No.; or PO .t
I ----- ------ ! -----------------------------------------------------------------
C3 CMK' Rate, ZIP-4
r- ba4 C,2,Uj 71C was'
AM. Uebnlary 2000
,71

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Ed Hardy
Lewis Sausage Company, Inc.
P. O. Box 1296
Burgaw, NC 28425
Dear Mr. Hardy:
fflo.N�W'A
'T 0 0
A&4;va
NCDENR
NORTH C^RouNA DEPARTMeNr of
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
December 12, 2001
RE: Remission Request
Lewis Sausage Company, Inc.
Permit # WQ0001949
Pender County
File #PC 00-082 .
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Ed Beck, WIRO Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File # PC 00-082 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier#52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opporrunitr• /Affiirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. en r.state. nc. us
%oZ

November 27, 2001
Ed Hardy
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc
P.O. Box 1296 _
G
Burgaw, NC 28425
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ F�f
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Mr. Lewis,
I have received notice of a civil penalty assessed against Lewis Sausage Co., File No. PC
00-082. The facts relative to the violations cited are, I believe, correct. However, I am
requesting that Lewis Sausage be granted remission on this assessed penalty based on the
following: 1. Lewis Sausage promptly abated any continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violations, and 2. Lewis Sausage went to a great expense in doing so,
and any further outlay of cash will bring about a financial burden on the Company.
I started working at Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. in February, 2000. I was hired to replace the
terminally ill president, Mr. David McLendon- who passed away in August, 2000. Mr.
McLendon was not able to spend much time with me before he became too incapacitated
to work, and we did not have the opportunity to review the operations of the waste
treatment lagoon.
My first meetine with Mr. Ed Beck, of the Wilmington Regional Office. was September
20. 2000. when he visited Lewis Sausage Co.. Inc. for a field inspection. At that time Mr.
Beck issued a Notice of Violation for the grease trap, which had overflowed. Mr. Beck
also told me that the waste treatment lagoon was too heavily overgrown with kudzu for
him to inspect it properly. 1v4r. Beck also noted that Lewis Sausage Co., Inc, had no
Operator in Responsible Charge, and that no logbook was being maintained.
We immediately had the grease trap out -flow pipe repaired and restored flow to the T
treatment lagoon; hired a crew to remove the heavy vegetation from the lagoon and pond F
so that it could be inspected; and contracted the services of a certified waste water
operator. Mr. George Yankay. Additionally. I applied for and received permission to act
as the Backup ORC with the understanding that I would start the necessary class work
and sit for the certification exam in March 2001. A logbook was started and a water''
meter was installed to track how much water was being used, to get a handle on the
expected Ievel of waste discharged into the lagoon.
-73

As we started removing the heavy vegetation from around the lagoon, a breach in the
dike wall was noticed. We immediately contacted Mr. Beck and simultaneously hired an
excavating company to start making the necessary repairs to the lagoon at a cost of
$3,255 to the Company.
On a subsequent site visit in October, Mr. Beck brought with him, Mr. Harry Lewis from
the Pender Co. Health Department. It was discovered that the drainage limes from the
septic tank had been rerouted to the lagoon. A Notice of Violation was issued. Within
seven (7) days we obtained a permit from the Pender Co. Health Department and
installed a new septic tank and drainage field, at a cost of $9,515 to the Company.
In December 2000, on a site visit, Mr. Beck found that there was still some seepage under
one of the dire walls. A Notice of Violation was issued. It was also noticed that - -
additional improvement was needed in some of the dice walls. I explained to Mr. Beck
that the areas of weakness were a result of an accumulation area from DOT run-off that
had flowed into the pond. Mr. Beck also told me that the dice walls should be surveyed
with a gage installed to insure a two -foot freeboard.
The DOT was notified of the run-off situation and made a site visit. They told us that
they were only responsible for the area nearer the road and that we would get no help
from them I discussed draining this run-off accumulation area with Mr. Beck and Ms.
Joanne Steenhuis, and was advised to contact the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, and I
did. I was given permission to partially drain the area as it is considered a wetland, but
that it should be done in such a manner to not create a water flow problem to another
area.
Again we brought in the excavating company to make the necessary repairs. And at this
point we rebuilt and shored up all the dike walls for both the lagoon and pond. This
required 2 separate trips from the excavating company with respective costs to the
Company of S2,236 and $3,217. Additionally, a gage was installed to measure the
freeboard.
In January 2001 during a site visit by Mr. Beck and leis. Steenhuis, it was noted that a
great deal of earth had been moved in rebuilding and repairing the dike walls of the
lagoon and the pond and that these areas should be seeded, with the appropriate silt
fencing installed. These measures were taken immediately at the cost of S2,480 to the
Company. Additionally, lair. Beck noted that the two -foot freeboard requirement was of
questionable. '
I told Mr. Beck that since the lagoon and pond had been adequately repaired, evaporation
was not sufficient to handle the volume of wastewater that the Company generates. And,
even though the Company had gone to a great deal of expense in repairing the lagoon and
pond it would be in the Company's best interest to petition the Town of Burgaw for
annexation, so that it might be connected to municipal sewage.
7X

I appeared before the next meeting of the Town of Burgaw Board of Commissioners, on
February 20, 2001. They accepted the Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. petition. They also
granted permission to Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. to pump and haul from its waste treatment
pond to the Burgaw Municipal Sewage Treatment plant, since the treatment lagoon was
in violation of the two -foot freeboard requirement.
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. had to expend $1,234 to gravel an access road to the lagoon, and
then $9,125 to haul sufficient wastewater to meet the two -foot freeboard requirement.
In the process of analyzing the wastewater, as required by the town, it was discovered
that the wastewater in the treatment lagoon had sufficient residence time that the BOD
was reduced to below the acceptable limits required by the town. So it was decided that
the treatment lagoon would serve as the pretreatment facility, and that the wastewater
could be pumped from the lagoon to the municipal treatment plant.
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. then hired Kimley — Horne & Associates to act as the
engineering company to put a project together, enabling Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. to be
connected to municipal sewage. However, it has been necessary to pump and haul again
since starting this project to protect the two -foot freeboard requirement, at a cost of an
additional $0,125.
Since the Company hires a large percentage of lower income employees it was able to
obtain Block Grant Money, which covers 75% of the costs associated directly with the
project to connect Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. to municipal sewage. The Company's share
of the project expenses to date has $30,300, which is above and beyond the previously
mentioned expenses associated with the lagoon repair. The actual numbers on the project
spending are still being compiled, as additional expenses may be necessary.
Expenses to date have been $40,197 to bring the waste treatment lagoon into compliance,
and $30,300 to connect to municipal sewage, which totals $70,497. Considering the
amount of money the Company has spent and the speed with which corrective action was
taken, Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. asks that any penalties accessed be reconsidered. The
lagoon is now in proper working order and Lewis Sausage Co., Inc. is now discharging
into municipal sewage, and any further expenses would be detrimental to the financial
health of the Companv.
R ectfully yours,
/1
Ed Hardy
President
%5

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF PENDER
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. WO0001949
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 00-082
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $6,618.40 _ for
violation(s) as SCL forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the
i aj,_ITY SECTION
�.'o-Ciscnacye Compliance E^f
day of EZ thi _�, tt , 2001.
S GNATLtE
ADDRESS �a
� • �C,C. G 2- t �
/ 0 SC 0 L� Sh ✓r�-✓�✓�r� to . �c.�-rt �
Nc 2 04,-7ug-
TELEPHONE
9lo - 2si- 2-64-2
7�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Ed Hardy, President
Lewis Sausage Co., Inc.
Post Office Box 1296
1050 Old Savannah Road
Burgaw, NC 28425
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Hardy:
A&I414"i*4 V�a
NCDENR
NORTH GROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NA'uRAL RFSONRCEs
October 30, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Violations of Permit No. WQ0001949
Pender County .
File No. PC 00-082
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Lewis Sausage Comp�rty,
Inc. in the amount of S6,618.40 which includes $1,118.40 in investigative costs. Attached is a
copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
t
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone], N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, Forth Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr.state.nc. its
717

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty. assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of anaccident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment -for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDEti12
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
••
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
t
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:
179

Office of 'Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
00
e rey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACIT'VIENTS
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Ed Beck, WIRO w/ attachments
rt1e # PC 00-082 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments
1
9y

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF PENDER
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADM[INISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. W00001949 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 00-082
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S6.618.40 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 . , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of
2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
gU

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL, RESOURCES
COUNTY OF PENDER
File No. PC 00-082
IN THE MATTER OF )
LEWIS SAUSAGE COMPANY, INC. )
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR VIOLATIONS OF NON -DISCHARGE) AND ASSESSMENT OF
PERMIT WQ0001949 ) CIVIL PENALTIES
AND 15A NCAC 2H .0224(a) )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (D`VQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Lewis Sausage Company, Inc. (Lewis Sausage) is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Lewis Sausage owns and operates a 1,500 gallon per day industrial wastewater
treatment system consisting of a greasetrap and a one-fourth (1/4) acre lagoon and
a two (2) acre lagoon connected in series located on SR 1345 in Burgaw, North
Carolina in Pender County.
C. Lewis Sausage was reissued Permit Number WQ0001949 on March 1, 1999 with
an expiration date of November 30, 2003. A permit was originally issued for the
facility on August 8, 1975.
D. Condition No. 3 of the issued permit states that "The facilities shall be properly
maintained and operated at all times."
E. Condition No. 8 of the issued permit states that "The facilities shall be effectively
maintained and operated as a non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of
any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility."
F. Condition No. 9 of ' the issued permit states that "Diversion or bypassing of
untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited."
9/

G. DWQ staff from the Wilmington Regional Office inspected Lewis Sausage on
September 20, 2000. Staff observed that the greasetrap was filled with grease.
Staff observed that wastewater was flowing out of the top of the grease trap,
across the ground surface, and entering an adjacent wetland rather than entering
the lagoon system. A heavy growth of kudzu made it impossible to assess the
impact of the discharge and to evaluate the condition of the lagoon dike walls.
H. Condition No. 12 of the issued permit states that "Adequate inspection,
maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Permittee to insure proper
operation of the subject facilities."
L The overflow from the top of the grease trap was the result of failure to adequately
inspect, maintain and clean the greasetrap.
J. Condition No. 10 of the issued permit states that freeboard in the lagoons shall not
be less than two (2) feet at any time-
K. During staff inspections on October 11, 2000, and October 23, 2000, staobserved
that the freeboard was less than two feet at several points on the dike of the
second lagoon. Repairs were being made to raise and strengthen the dike,
including repairing a breach that was discovered when the kudzu was removed.
L. Condition No. 13 of the issued permit states in part that the Permittee shall inspect
the facilities to prevent malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and
discharges which may cause or lead to the release of wastes to the environment, a
threat to human health, or a nuisance. It further states that the Permittee shall
maintain an inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of
inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions
taken by the Permittee. The log of inspections shall be maintained by the
Permittee for a period of three years from the date of the inspection and shall be
made available to the Division upon request.
lei. No inspection log or summary was being maintained by Lewis Sausage.
N. As of January 1, 1997, a certified operator in responsible charge is required to
operate a treatment works which does not discharge to surface waters in ,
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0224(a).
O. According to DWQ records, no certified operator in charge of the animal waste
management system was designated at Lewis Sausage. ,
P. Condition No. 2 of the issued permit states that "This permit is effective only with
respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the application and other
supporting data." The issued permit describes the system as an industrial
wastewater treatment facility and all permit applications have stated that industrial
waste is treated in the system. A septic tank system was constructed at Lewis
Sausage to accept the domestic waste from restrooms and sinks.
8a

Q. During the inspection on October 23, 2000, DWQ staff observed, by the
introduction of dye, that waste from the restrooms was flowing through an
illegally installed pipe to the industrial waste treatment lagoons.
R. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$1,118.40.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
1L CONCLUSIONS*OFLAW: ,
A. Lewis Sausage is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit is required for the operation of a treatment works pursuant to G.S. 143-
2153(a)(2).
A. The operational conditions and reporting requirements contained in the subject
permit are terms, conditions, or requirements of said permit.
C. The above -cited failure to'properly maintain and operate the facilities at all times
violated Condition No. 3 of Permit No. WQ0001949.
D. The above -cited failure to effectively maintain and operate the facility as a non -
discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastewater violated Condition
No. 8 of Permit No. WQ0001949.
E. The above -cited diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater violated
Condition No. 9 of Permit No. WQ0001949.
F. The above -cited failure to adequately inspect, maintain, and clean the grease trap
to insure proper operation violated Condition No. 12 of Permit No. WQ0001949.
G. The above -cited failure to maintain at least two (2) feet of freeboard in the
lagoons violated Condition No. 10 of Permit No. WQ0001949.
H. The above -cited failure to maintain an inspection log or summary violated
Condition No. 13 of Permit No: WQ0001949.
I. The above -cited failure to designate a certified operator for the waste ,treatment
system violated 15A NCAC 2H .0224(a). '
J. The above -cited connection of the domestic wastewater system to the industrial
wastewater treatment system violated Condition No. 2 of Permit No.
WQ0001949.
93

IM
K. Lewis Sausage may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten -thousand dollars
($10,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails
to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit
required by G.S. 143-215_1.
L_ The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Lewis
Sausage pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
M. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Lewis Sausage is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
for violating condition No. 3 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
failing to properly operate and maintain the facilities
S for violating condition No. 8 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
failing to effectively maintain and operate the facility as a
non -discharge system to prevent the discharge of any
wastewater
S i 000, y for violating condition No. 9 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
the diversion or bypassing of untreated wastewater
S % i% 7% for violating condition No. 12 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
failing to adequately inspect, maintain, and clean the grease
trap
S SOD • for violating condition No. 10 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
failing to maintain two (2) feet of freeboard in the lagoons
S .SCC) for violating 15A NCAC 2H .0224(a) by failing to designate a
certified operator for the waste treatment system
S '500 . r for violating condition No. 13 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
failing to maintain an inspection log or summary
5Y

$ 1,118.40
for violating condition No. 2 of Permit No. WQ0001949 by
connecting the septic tank to the ,industrial wastewater
treatment system
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AIMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
The duration and gravity of the violation;
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
The cost of rectifying the damage;
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;.
The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
The cost to the State
30 Or-7-0/
(Date)
_ t Unit
Division of Water Quality
d

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we -can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to: � ✓
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) I B. Date of Delivery
C. Signature
X O Agent
v co—U�+ ❑ Addressee
D. loelivery address diffeferrt from Rem 1? 13 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
1�( Certified Mail ❑�{ Express Mail
O Registered t°1 Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service labeo
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0992
m
0
ru
Ln Postage 5 (.
S Certified Fee
Pds;..^a-,
Re%rr. Receipt Fee Here
Ln (Encorser^em Required '.
a
Q Restrimed Delivery Fee
t3 (Endorsement Required) i
0 Total Postage & Fees $
r-3
S Recipient's Name • ease P t C.eanw •tc -ompie;e2z —ader
Sheet- . ^r -^r ,? .
1�.9�-----------------------------------------------
G Ciry. S;a;e r
_ PS Form 38UU. Ml uary "LULU See Heverse for Usl ruMons ,
96

AGENDA ITEM: _�z —010 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Vision Developers(SS 01-010)
Onslow County
EXPLANATION: On October 29, 2001, the Chief, Division of Water
Quality, assessed a civil penalty of $7,329.52
($7,000.00 civil penalty and $329.52 investigative
costs) against Vision Developers for violations of
15A NCAC 2H.0501, 15A NCAC 2H.0501 and
15A NCAC 2B.0231(b). The civil penalty
assessment represents 35 percent of the maximum
allowed by G.S. 143-215.6A.
On November 16, 2001, Vision Developers
requested remission and waived Vision
Developers's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in Vision Developers's request for
remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his delegation
provided by the secretary and did not find
grounds to modify the assessment.
�7

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
November 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Danny Baysden
Vision Developers
PO Box 1685
Jacksonville NC 28540
e��
D E N R
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Mallard Creek Subdivision
Onslow County
File No. SS 01-010
Dear Mr. Baysden:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Vision Developers, Inc. in the amount of
S7329.52, including S329.52 in enforcement costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken under the
authority vested in me by delegation pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(h). Any continuing violation(s) may be
the subject of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice. you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (do not include waiverform). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Ms. Linda Forehand Fitzpatrick
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1617
1
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone]. FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer W49 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed justification for such
request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of the amount
of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of any of the statements
contained in the assessment letter. Becausea remission request forecloses the option of an
administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must
execute and return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement
which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were wrongfully
applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial
actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of.
Linda Fitzpatrick
DENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
M
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an administrative
hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of Administrative
Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Drawer 27447
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley
Registered Agent
Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687 -
Raleiah, North Carolina 27611-7687
RE

Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not a
postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may .be levied for future violations which occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone], extension 526.
Sincerely,
Coleen H. S ins
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Office w/ attachments
le

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
COUNTY OF ONSLOW NATURAL RESOURCES
IN THE MATTER OF ) File No. SS 01-010
Vision Developers, Inc. )
Mr. Danny Baysden, President ) FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
FOR VIOLATIONS OF. ) CIVIL PENALTIES
15A NCAC 2H .0501 and )
15A NCAC 2B .0231 (b) )
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I, Coleen Sullins, Chief for the Non -discharge
Branch of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FI\'DINGS OF FACT:
A. Vision Developers, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of North Carolina
B. Vision Developers, Inc., is the owner and developer of the tract known as
the Mallard Creek Subdivision located off US Hwy 17 near Verona in .
Onslow County.
C. On July 16, 2001 and September 25, 2001, the Division of Water Quality
Staff inspected the site and observed an unauthorized discharge of fill into
approximately 0.43 acres of wetlands during construction of a road
crossing.
D. The wetlands is adjacent to Harper's Branch, a tributary to Hick's Run
which is classified as C- Swamp NSW waters in the White Oak River
Basin.
E. The Corps of Engineers confirmed that approximately 0.43 acres of
wetlands had been impacted.
F. 15A NCAC 2H.0501(b) requires certifications pursuant to Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act whenever construction or operation of facilities'will
result in a discharge into navigable waters, including wetlands, as
described in 33 CFR Part 323.
r/

G. 15A NCAC 2H.0502 states any person desiring issuance of the state
certification or coverage under a general certification required by Section
401 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall file with the Director
of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality.
H. 15A NCAC 2B .0231 (b)(1) lists standards which shall be used to assure
the maintenance or enhancement of the existing uses of wetlands.
I. A review of DWQ files confirmed that a General Permit or a Water
Quality Certification was not requested nor issued as of September 25,
2001.
J. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
S329.52.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. COtiCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Vision Developers, Inc., under the direction of Mr. Danny Baysden,
President, is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6 pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4). .
B. The wetlands adjacent to Harper's Branch, a tributary to Hick's Run are
located within a tract known as the Mallard Creek Subdivision. Harper's
Branch and the wetlands located along tract known as the Mallard Creek
Subdivision constitute waters of the State within the meaning of G.S. 143-
212(6).
C. Vision Developers, Inc., violated 15A NCAC 2H .0501 and 15A NCAC
2H .0502 by fill of approximately 0.43 acres of wetlands without
application for and issuance of the state certification or coverage under a
general certification required by Section 401 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act.
D. Vision Developers, Inc. violated 15A NCAC 2B .0231 (b) by the fill to
0.43 acres of wetlands, which impacted existing wetland uses.
E. Vision Developers, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a) I and G.S. 143-215.6A(a)2, which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand 'dollars
(S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates
any classification, standard, limitation. or management practice
established pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3, 143-214.2, or 143-215, or who is
required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
,'a

H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against
Vision Developers, Inc., pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3 (a)(9) and G.S. 143B-
282.1 (b)(8).
I. The Chief, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by
the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; I make the following:
M. DECISION:
Accordingly, Vision Developers, Inc., is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
-7-
S 329.52
S -7 sz- . S
for j— of two violations for failing to
apply for a water quality certification
according to 15A NCAC 2H .0501 and 15A
NCAC 211.0502.
for of two violations by the fill of
0.43 acres of wetlands resulting in adverse
impacts on the wetland according to 15A
NCAC 2B .0231 (b).
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is
percent of the maximum penalty
authorized by G.S. 143-215..6A.
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S.143B-282.1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the
public health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
y3

(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with
programs over which the Environmental Management Commission has
regulatory authority;
(8) .The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
/6 Z A/ �'
(Date) oleen Su , Chief
Division oY Water Quality

JOHN L. PIERCE'A ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LAND SURVEYING - LAND PLANNING - MAPPING
OFFICE: 910-346-9800
FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL: jpierce 0 onslowonline.net
P.O. Box 1685
Jacksonville, NC 28541
November 15, 2001
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick
N.C. Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Department of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
409 Johnson Blvd_
Jacksonville, NC 28540
��' airi�S�T/O
' Vance Enf
Re: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation of N.C. General Statute Section
143.215.1 Mallard Creek Subdivision, Onslow County
Your File No.: SSO1-010
Dear Ms. Fitzpatrick:
Enclosed is the Waiver to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts in
connection with the referenced assessment. On behalf of Mallard Creek Development
Inc. (successor to Vision Developers, I am requesting a remission of the civil penalty for
the reasons set forth hereinafter.
Mallard Creek Development Inc., was the successor owner of the property where the fill
of wetlands occurred. At the time of the road extension, it was our understanding from
the previous owner, that all permits for development of the referenced subdivision has
been issued. Since the development of the subdivision was commenced several years
ago, it was further our belief that up to .33 of an acre could be filled without a permit
from the Cops of Engineers. As I am sure you are aware, the rules concerning regulation
of wetlands have been changed frequently during the last few years. The original design
for the road extension would have been significantly less intrusive in the wetlands,
however, at the suggestion the Department of Transportation a larger area was impacted.
Once we became aware of the violation, the original road design was reimplemented.and
a substantial portion of the impacted wetlands restored.
LOTS. FARMLAND AND WOODLAND SURVEYING - SITE PLANNING • SUBDIVISION LAYOUT - LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING - TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYING AND MAPPING
Phase I Environmental Audit / Risk Assessment
�j5

Page 2
Mallard Creek Subdivision
November 15, 2001
Our request for a remission of the civil penalty is based upon the fact that the violation
was inadvertent and was promptly abated once discovered.
I appreciate your consideration for this request.
Sincerely,
John L. Pierce
MALLARD CREEK DEVELOPMENT INC.
Jp/bb
1IG

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF Onslow
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
Vision Developers, Inc -
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAG01N�'I'
CON0IISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. SS 01-010
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling $7329.52 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated, October 29. 2001 , the
undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the i' ( day of no Ve m 62p , 1/20
DEC I -cc
SIGNATURE %"/ATF % QUALITY SECTIC
'%'on -Discharge Compliance E
ADDRESS
�?_o.��
-� aC_L-S6nVi l l9. fj;G zk�l
TELEPHONE
_(_9103-9VvV

AGENDA ITEM: 10L © Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
WBW Farms, Inc. (PC 01-014)
DuQlin County
EXPLANATION: On November 2, 2001, Jeffrey O. Poupart,
Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and
Enforcement Unit of the Division of Water Quality,
assessed a civil penalty of $3,962.77 ($3,400.00
civil penalty and $562.77 investigative costs)
against WBW Farms, Inc. for violation of G.S. 143-
215.1.
On December 4, 2001, WBW Farms, Inc. requested
remission and waived their right to an
administrative hearing and stipulated that the facts
were as alleged in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of WBW Farms, Inc.'s
request for remission of civil penalties in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his
delegation provided by the secretary and did
not find grounds to modify the assessment.
q�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
March 18, 2002
Mr. Tom Whitfield
Post Office Box 98
Pink Hill, NC 28572
NCDENR
NORTH GROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND N.QURAL RESOURCES
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
WBW Farms, Inc..
Duplin County
Case Number PC 01-014
Dear Mr. Whitfield:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental i%,ianagement Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental \Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions. r
.Mailing address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Ser%ice Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina_'7699-1617 State Courier ?-5?-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity lAffirmative Action Emplgyer
309c recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
hnp✓17z2o.enr stare.nc.its
qq

You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $3,962.77 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Office
File PC 01-014
1
/UJ

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Ibiichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Tom Whitfield
WBW Farms, Inc.
PO Box 98
Pink Hill, NC 28572
Dear Mr. Whitfield:
1 •OL
•
NCDENR
NORTH UROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NQURAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAII-
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Farm # 31-376
Duplin .County
File No. PC 01-014
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143=215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of $3,962.77.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on .Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty. please make your check
pavable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
r
Mailing Address: Telephone (9I9) 733-5083 Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Ajfrrnzarive Action Employer
50% recycled / 10"c post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr.srare.nc. us

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Stonewall Mathis, WIRO
-file # PC 01-014
Central Files
. 1s
/oa

S
S
r3
Ln
ri
S
u7
O
r3
O
O
-.T-
M
Ir
r-
Re%.m Feceic: _=
(Enccrse^en: Rec; •ems
Resat:ec Ceaver. _ee
!Enccrse^en: Rec-
Total Postage & Fees S
Recipizat's Name = __ = ^r Cfe-• c c_ comp
1-e'!11 ------------------------------------------
/0 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Tom Whitfield
Post Office Box 98
Pink Hill, NC 28572
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Whitfield:
1 � •
NCDENR
Nomni GROt1MA DEPARTMENT or
ENVIRONMENT ANo MA"tAL RESOURCES
November 2, 2001
CERTIFIED MAID
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Violation of Non -Discharge
General Permit
Farm # 31-376
Duplin County
File No. PC 01-014
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against WBW Farms, Inc. in the
amount of S3,962.77 which includes S562.77 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
zr
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiverform).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
l 617 ,Nlail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-0 1 -0 1 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunitv/Affirmative action Employer
307c recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
htrp://h2o. en r. sta re. n c. us
i0 y

F
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Po
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
M
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:
l
le-

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
effrey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACH]NiENTS
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Stoney Mathis, WIRO w/ attachments.
•,File"# PC 01-0144w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments
/D 6

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADNE ISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. AWS310376 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 01-014
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $3,962.77 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water
Quality dated, November 2.2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek
remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the
above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of 92001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
Y
TELEPHONE
icy

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
File No. PC 01-014
IN THE MATTER OF
)
CHARLES THOMAS WHITFIELD
)
AND WBW FARMS, INC.
)
FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR NON -DISCHARGE GENERAL
) AND ASSESSMENT OF
PERMIT VIOLATIONS
) CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), I,
Jeffrey O. Poupart, make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. WBW Farms, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of North Carolina. Charles Thomas Whitfield is the president of WBW
Farms, Inc. '
B. Charles Thomas (Tom) Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. own and operate
WBW Farms, Inc. which is a swine operations located near North Carolina
Highways 11 and 903 in Duplin County.
C. Tom Whitfield was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS310376 under General
Permit AWG100000 for WBW Farms, Inc. on June 23, 2000, effective June 23,
2000, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003.
D. Condition No. I. 2. of the General Permit incorporates by reference the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for a facility and states that any
violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of the general permit.
The WUP is a component of the CAW.L . The WUP for WBW Farms, Inc.
states in part that "The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate
of the soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs." '
E. Condition No. H. 4. of the General Permit states that "Land application rates shall
be in accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. In no case
shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen rate for the
receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application."
/09

F. On August 16, 2000, DWQ staff from the Wilmington Regional Office inspected
WBW Farms, Inc. in response to observations by DWQ staff during a flyover.
Staff observed ponding- of animal waste at two locations in spray field #8
(hydrants C and D) and runoff of animal waste into wooded areas adjacent to each
location.
G. According to onsite representatives, land application of animal waste had last
occurred on August 12, 2000 and August 14, 2000 on spray field 8, hydrants C
and D, respectively.
H. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$562.77.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Tom Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. are "persons" within the meaning of G.S.
143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. Tom Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. violated ,Condition No. I. 2. of the
General Permit by applying waste at rates which resulted in ponding.
D. Tom Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc: violated Condition H. 4. of the General
Permit by applying waste at rates which resulted in runoff.
E. Tom Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. may be assessed civil penalties pursuant
to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than
twenty-five thousand dollars (S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a
person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or
requirements of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter maybe assessed against Tom
Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S.
143B-282. 1 (b)(8).
G. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge. Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
16,

'Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Tom Whitfield and/or WBW Farms, Inc. are hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 1,700.00
$ 1,700.00
$ 562.77
$ 3,962.77
for violation of Condition No. 12. of the General Permit by
exceeding land application rates which resulted in ponding'
for violation of Condition No. H. 4. of the General Permit
by exceeding land application rates which resulted in runoff
Enforcement costs
TOTAL ANT IOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
,--- IJcv 01
(Date)
ey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
/10

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the hack of the mailpiece,
or on the front 'rf space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
f�oYV% LOhiXc-
����
A Received by (Please Pnnt Clearly) B. Date f a very
W_ E. �3,? E%,y c � / r �� 7o r
C. Signature
X U� gent
❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery address cfl fetent from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
\
I$ certified Mail
❑,.y Express Mail
❑ Registered
2LReturm Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service laben
Io41S I5a2�
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-00-M-0952
cO
ru ,
Ln
Ln
Ostace
s
C2-`ed -se
G/ Q
Postmark
t17
Retur^=ece:Dt Cee
�.Endorse—e-t ?eau�rec
Here
ri
p
Restnctec Ce.cery Fee
p
(Endorsemert Requirec
i
r-3
Total Postage & Fees S
C3
T
S
Recipient's Name :F a=== ;^.^; ea• I,- -_ 7-rr.01e.e= c. er)
D� i
- - Q 4----•-
IT-
Ir-
S'reet ._
D a
t7
--
4 I
`Ni
+,
1 `--� �� U" V• dam- a aJ I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Mr. Tom Whitfield
WBW Farms, Inc.
Post Office Box 98
Pink Hill, NC 28572
Dear Mr. Whitfield:
AVzI'W,A
1 0 a
.0
NCDENR
NoRTM C. AROUNA DEPARTMENT of
ENVIRONMENT AND NAi uRAL RESOURCES
December 6, 2001
RE: Remission Request
WBW Farms
Farm # 31-376
Duplin County
File #PC 01-014
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Stoney Mathis, W-IRO w/attachment
Central Files
File # PC 01-014 w/ 3 attachments
.Mailing Address: Telephone (9I9) 733-5083 Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Ralei_h, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmarive Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrrp://h2o. enr.state.nc.lrs
/ia

WBW FARMS INC.
PO BOX 98
PINK HILL, NC 28572
11 /16/01
Mr. Steve Lewis
N.C. Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Lewis:
D;EC 4 c:i1�i
VVA..T`, QU-ALITY SECTION
'Van -Discharge Compliance Enf.
By way of this letter, and on behalf of WBW Farms, Inc. we would like to request total
remission of the penalties levied due to the August infractions. WBW Farms would like
you to consider the following facts that follow the requested protocol in the November
assessment package. _ We feel if the following factors are considered the penalty should
be waived.
This incident occurred inadvertently as a result of land application evert which resulted in
the ponding of waste in areas not designated to receive waste. These areas were on the
edge of the field boundary and along the edge of the woods adjacent to the spray area.
Immediately following the visit from state inspectors on 8/16 we pumped, as requested, all
ponded and contained effluent back into the designated spray area and backfilled low..
areas with topsoil. In addition we immediately addressed all areas of tl^e application fields
that needed improvement. These depressions were in the areas where ponding had
occurred and other areas of concern not noted as a problem by your cmce, but areas in
which the operators felt needed attention. We made extensive field improvements that
involved the use of dump trucks, tractors, leveling equipment, and backhoes. All
available farm resources were allocated to this project that started and still continues. In
addition, the reel nozzle sizes were reduced and the reel speeds increased as to lower
the volume loading when applying to hydraulic sensitive areas. We realize that this and
past infractions have been narrowed to hydraulic loadings and continue to inspect before,
during, and after application events occur to assure waste is being applied properly.
WBW Farms realizes the importance of keeping a high quality spray field that is
conditioned to receive waste at designated application times.
It should be noted that in February 2001 an executive decision was made to remove all
cattle from the farm rotation. This decision was made voluntarily to promote the quality of
the spray fields and prevent added maintenance pressure that cattle exhibit. This project
came as an expense of approximately $100.000. To promote conservation of fresh .
water, nipple dispensers were installed on all houses, which reduced the usage of fresh
water by 50% but came in the way of an expense of approximately $75.000. Grassed
waterways were put in place around sensitive areas, of the spray fields at an additional
expense of S7.500. Dirt hauling and equipment usage added another S17,500 to the
i/ 3

• Page 2
November 26, 2001
improvement -expenses. All totaled WBW has spent $200,000 dollars to promote
regulatory compliance.
On 5/11 a notice (enclosed) was sent out per your request that notified the required
media and was published by several papers when in fact the state has never found a
"discharge to waters of the state" on our farm. The only infractions have come in the way
of penTdt conditions. Due to un-warranted pressure from environmental groups, and
the approved proximity of our farm we have paid one of the highest penalty amounts in
the arena of animal waste in regards to permit condition violations ($5,907.87on 3✓14101).
It should be noted that when the 221/01 assessment was paid that it was assumed by
DWQ contact that all infractions for year 2000 were covered under the penalty amount
However, the DWQ Central office was unaware of the August infraction due to the
untimely notice from the Wilmington Regional Office for this infraction. The DWQ central
office was not notified of the August 2000 infraction until May of 2001(nine months). This
down time caused the client to be misinformed and is entirely too long for an efficient
regulatory agenda. Mr. Lewis, I would like to ask you to please consider all issues
contained in this memo and realize that we- understand the importance of "remaining in
compliance" and have been punished more than enough for not having a °discharge to
waters of the State of North Carolina".
With Kind Regards.
-re-, LA):
Tom Whitfield of WBW Farms, Inc.
/iV

WBW Farms, Inc.
1606 N NC 11 & 903 HWY
K6nansville, NC 26349
May 11, 2000
Notice of Discharge of Animal Waste
The WBW Farm facility #31-376, on State Road NC 11, 9 miles NE of Kenansville, had
a discharge of swine waste of an estimated volume greater than 1,000 gallons. The discharge
was discovered on May 10, 2000 and lasted for approximately 45 minutes. The waste entered a
drainage way that flows to the NE Cape Fear River Basin. The volume of wastewater was
pumped from ponded areas back into the spray fields as specified by the Division of Water
Quality. This notice was required by North Carolina General Statutes Article 21 Chapter
143.215.0
Contact Person: Tom Whitfield [phone]
/t-5

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DUPLIN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. AWS310376
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
. WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADVIINLSTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC O 1-014
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $3,962.77 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water
Quality dated, November 2. 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek
remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the
above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the " . 6 day of N a `) - , 2001.
omm oa F.xiresNw—eMber X 20W
A
ADDRESS
FAD- Box fe
_45�Z 2' IJL
TELEPHONE
2_.5,Z - sCsr- a23 a y
1
116

a ~ ,. '._ •�.L+�.��y`. row! .-.� i-Ly .� . � 'v
te
`..{� off` � � .S .� _ `X•;- ,�„ -c.. _. .:
.__►�2„ • 1 z1-... L. -
- �

ry y
��!' �, �,,� � •--3'� .r�, � _,, .,tea
-_' � %r; _
�
.. .. -
•.
-
a
�! � - -.
i - 4
` S.
'
l "�
� is •1 ' +/jr�� � " . - ..
y A -A

St
'N16

Animal «aste ponding. WBW Farms, Inc., Facilitv 4 31-376, August 16, 2000
RECEIVE�?
MAY 0 6 Luui
`WATER QUALITY SECTIC'M
dance — ..
-. ";charge Ccmp' "
;a0

M
AGENDA ITEM: j21f © Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
City of Roxboro(CV 01-002)
Person County
EXPLANATION: On November 1, 2001, the Supervisor, Non -
Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit, Division
of Water Quality, assessed a civil penalty of
$1,246.05 ($1,000.00 civil penalty and $246.05
investigative costs) against City of Roxboro for
violations of G.S. 143-215.1. The civil penalty
assessment represents 10 percent of the maximum
allowed by G.S. 143-215.6A.
On November 29, 2001, Mr. James W. Freeman,
City Manager requested remission and waived the
City of Roxboro's right to an administrative hearing
and stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in City of Roxboro's request for
remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his delegation
provided by the secretary and did not find
grounds to modify the assessment.
/dl

State of North Carolina "
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easlev, Governor
William G. (Bill) Ross, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. James Freeman, City Manager
City of Roxboro
P.O. Box 128
Roxboro, NC 27573
1 •
'T
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 30, 2001
Subject: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty for Violations of
N.C. General Statute 143-215.1 and Permit No. WQ0007268
City of Roxboro
Case No. CV 01-002
Person County
Dear Mr. Freeman:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
S tzy6o(SIP-00-ap+ S 21,4 a enforcement costs) against the City of Roxboro.
This assessment is based upon the following facts. During an inspection by the Division, it
was observed that the collection system for the City of Roxboro Southside Pump Station was in
the final phase of an upgrade. A permit for this construction had not been issued. Also, the
Division observed that the Williams Road Pump Station had been upgraded previously; however
the modifications were -not according to the issued permit No. WQ0007268.
Based on the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the City of Roxboro violated
N.C.G.S. 143-215.1. by constructing a treatment works without a permit and also violated the
conditions of Permit No. WQ0007268 by making modifications other than those contained in the
permit. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by
N. C. G. S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
16181\•iail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609-1618
An Equal 'Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
htrp://h20.enrstate.nc.us .
iaa
Location:
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609

Roxboro Enforcement
Page 2
Based on the above findings of fact and conclusions of law (attached), and in accordance with
the authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, I, Jeff Poupart, supervisor of the Non -discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit of the
Division of Water Quality, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment against the City
of Roxboro.
$ % 000. For failing to apply for or to secure a permit as required by
N.C.G.S. 143-215.1 for construction of the subject
Southside Pump Station upgrade.
$ — 0 For 1 violation of permit no. WQ0007268 and G.S. 143- .
215.1 for construction of the Williams Road Pump Station
upgrade.
$ / 6 0 D TOTAL CIVIL.PENALTY, which is percent of the
maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143.-215.6A.
$ 246.05 Enforcement costs
$ /z q L oS TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B=
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State,-io the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) - The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5)° The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following: r.
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
ia3

Roxboro Enforcement
Page 3
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit.this information to the attention of:
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick
Non�Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1618 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-1618
An Equal Opporrunin• /A, ffirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrtp://h20. enr.state.nc.us
Location:
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609

Roxboro Enforcement
Page 4
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission must be
submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the information
during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision in the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental
Management Commission Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that the
Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to
the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within jhjE!y days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in -this matter
being referred to the Office of the Attorney General with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
1. .s

A
`Roxboro Enforcement
Page 5
Please be advised that any continuing yiolation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this civil
penalty assessment, please contact Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick at 919-733-5083, extension 526.
j A 0/
(Date) e f oupart, supervisor
Non -discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement-Filer/-attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1618 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27609-1618
An Equal Opportunity• /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
hnp.11h20. en r.srate. nc. us
Location:
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609

1
Citp of 3koxboro
November 29, 2001
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
DECEIVED
1 2 2 20012
%-!/AT" QUALITY SECTION
"ion-UisOiarge Compliance Enf.
I) /0
Reference: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
Permit No. WQ0007268
Case No. CV 01-002.- City of Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Fitzpatrick:
In reference to the above subject matter, this acknowledges the City of Roxboro's
receipt of NCDENR Division of Water Quality Supervisor Jeff Poupart's October 30, 2001
letter on November 9, 2001. Since said NCDENR correspondence cites two different
projects, the City will respond accordingly.
■ Southside Sewer Pump Station
The City of Roxboro's Southside Pump Station has had a history of mechanical
failures, which warranted emergency action to prevent potential environment
damage. Therefore, due to the potential danger of continued wastewater spills to the
environment, the City responded by initiating replacement of the station's existing
pumps while utilizing the existing structure, force main, . and making minor
modifications to the existing control panel. This response also included the expense of
acquiring a portable standby pump, to back up the stations existing pumps if failure
occurred during the installation. The pump purchased by the City for this project was
a diesel powered portable pump costing $46,257. As evidenced, these implemented
actions by the City were to protect the environment and prevent further spills.
Please find extended an apology for not realizing the need for a N&ENR
construction permit to replace the existing pumps; however, we now have initiated
that process.
105 S. LAMAR STREET • P. O. BOX 128 • ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27573 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

A
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick
Page 2
November 19, 2001
■ Williams Road Sewer Pump Station
The Williams Road Pump Station was a NCDENR permitted upgrade
(WQ0007268) to improve this facility's performance. During the construction phase,
the station was modified to include additional wet -well capacity that would allow the
existence of equalized flow conditions at this site. In particular, the additional wet -
well capacity consisted of constructing a new five-foot diameter wet -well placed
beside the original. Thereby, such additional wet -well assured that no additional
spills occurred during the construction phase of this modification. This was only done
to permit the placement of new pumps, stainless steel rails, and controls while the
original equipment continued to operate. Once the construction was completed the
two wet -wells were connected. Except for the wet -well all appurtenances were in
accordance with the approved permitted upgrade.
This decision to modify the wet well was made to accommodate construction
activity. Again, it is with regret that the City did not immediately notify or submit to
the State this change. However, when making this decision, it was the City's intention
to provide a safe working environment for the construction crew and to nuTu"mize the
potential for any environmental impacts during construction. It was not to increase
the capacity of the station.
In closing, please consider that the above -mentioned City actions were not made to
ignore NCDENR permit regulations, but were oversights and/or incorrect
interpretations. Furthermore, the end -result of these actions did already cost the City and
in all cases protected both the environment and safety of construction personnel (Williams
Rd. Station). Therefore, please consider remission or mitigation of the civil penalty as
stated in your letter. Enclosed is a waiver and stipulation form If there are any
questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincer y,
w
Jam Qim) W. Freeman '
Manager
Enclosure
Cc: Lindsay Mize, Public Service Director
Don Garbrick, Pease Engineer
/aF

A
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT.' ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
THE CITY OF ROXBORO ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. cv of-nn2
. Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 1.246.or, for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor'dated
30 October 2001 the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water. Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the 29 day of November 20 01
James W. Freeman, City Manager
BY
ADDRESS
Roxboro, NC 27573
TELEPHONE
336-599-3116
t
is s

AGENDA ITEM: -©- Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Town of Princeton (LV 01-228)
Johnston County
EXPLANATION: On July 3, 2001, Ken Schuster, Division of Water
Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor for the
Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of
$4,366.00 ($4,325.00 civil penalty, plus $41.00
investigative costs) against the Town of Princeton
for violations of NPDES Permit No. NC0026662
and G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(6).
On August 28, 2001, The Honorable William E.
Ormond requested remission and waived the Town
of Princeton's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty beyond that
which was granted by the Director following his
review of the matter.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Town of
Princeton's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and modified the initial penalty
assessment of $4,366.00 to the total amount
of $4,291.00.
4
i 3e

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
NCDENii
NoRTM CARour4A DEPARTMENT or
ENVIRONMENT AND NQURAL REsouRCEs
CERTIFIED MAIL July 6, 2001
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. William Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
116 South Pine Street
Princeton, NC 27569
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO026662
Princeton WWTP
Case No. LV 01-228
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $4,366.00 ($ 4,325.00 civil penalty + $41.00 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Princeton WWTP.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been conducted of the
discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town of Princeton WWTP for the month
of February 2001 for the Town of Princeton WWTP. This review has shown the subject facility
to be in violation of the discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES
Permit NC0026662. The violations which occurred in February 2001 are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of Princeton
WWTP violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NCO026662 and
N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may
be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)o).
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

It
Princeton
Page Two
t
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority
provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster P.E., Division of Water Quality
Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following civil penalty assessment
against the Town of Princeton WWTP:
For / of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662; by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit Monthly average effluent limits for
BOD,-
$ t`Jzo For / of the _1 violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit Monthly average effluent limits for
TSS.
For 7i of the violation of G.S..143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
BODE
$ �S For 2 of the 2 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
TSS.
$ / �i For -J* of the 6 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily maximum effluent limits for
Total Residual Chlorine.
$ 75" For 3 of the _.A_ violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
failing to monitor for effluent Temperature.f -
$ 0 For of the 1_ violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the.State in
violation of permit effluent limits for
13a

Princeton
Page Three
For �_ of the __I— violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit effluent limits for Dissolved
OXygen.
$ ���5 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY authorized by G.S. 143-
215.6A.
$ 41.00 Enforcement costs.
$ / Z6 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of -
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
1.3 3
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:

Princeton
Page Four
a
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision in the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete Und
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
13,�4

Princeton
Page Five
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan McLawhorn, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within JhLrty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Regional
Office at 919-571-4700.
3 ZQO
(D te) Kenneth Schuster, P.E. r
Water Quality Regional Supervid&
Raleigh Region L S
Division of Water Quality o
ATTACHMENTS —
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments -�
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
j�3

Princeton
Page Six
Attachment A
Princeton WWTP
February 2001
nthly Average Limit Violati
arameter Rfported Value limft
BODS 300.4* 30
TSS 145.3* 30
ekly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Idmft
BOD5 552.9* 45
BOD5 87.0* 45
TSS 73.5* 45
412.0* 45
Parameter
Residual Chlorine
Dissolved Oxygen
ilv Maximum Limit Violations
Reported Value
IAMii
460.0*
17
100.0
17
20.0
17
50.0*
17
40.0
17
510.0*
17
3.3
>5
Frequency Violations
Parameter Date Values Reported
Daily Effluent Temperature 2/14/01 * None
2/15/01 * None
2/16101 * None
* = Limit violations that were assessed a civil penalty.
Units
mg/I
mg/I
Units
mg/l
mg/I
mg/I
mg/1
Units
ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
ug/l
ug/l
ug/I
mg/I
136

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
THE TOWN OF PRINCETON ) AND
PERMIT NO. NCO026662 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 01-228
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 4 L) &L,Ion for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor dated
the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the �� �-h day of , 20 a t
IM
PHONE
A0_ ,og5oc)

TOWN OF PR11.1V CE 1i O
Mayor Commissioners
William E. Ormond 116 S. Pine Street Walter Martin, Jr.
PO Box 67 David Starling
Mayor Pro Tern Princeton, North Carolina 27669 tarry Withrow
Eddie Haddock
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
Town Clerk Chief of Police
Marla Ashworth Edward Lewis
RffffffffflfffflfflNlRRRfffffflRRffffflRRlff►RRNRRHlRNfffRRRRNflRflRR!lfRMRRRlRffRMRRR*►RRfR!lRNfif!!f!R!
August 1
s. Coleen Sullins
ater Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty for
Violations of NC General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NG09266.2
Princeton WWTP ICU o 210 tP to 2-
Case No. LV 01-228
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter transmits a request for remission of civil penalties assessed against the Town of
Princeton WWTP in the amount of $4,366.00 for violations of NPDES Permit NCO026662 in the
month of February, 2001.
The Town of Princeton was first made aware of a oxbNem * tt solids being dischar9W W9h-"f
peffluent an February 2,2001 eftr Envirolink, Inc. took over the operation of the Princeton
WWTP on February 1, 2001. John Boykin, President of Envirolink, and his staff immediately
began changes at the WWTP to reduce the amount of solids being released which included
throttling back the influent bumps and running the oxidation ditches at lower levels. Envirolink
also began studying the WWTP design and operation manuals to identify the source of the
problem that was causing the release of solids. Included in their investigation was contact with
United Industries, the manufacturer of the boat clarifiers used at the WWTP, and a technical
assistance visit from NCDENR. During the investigation as to the cause of solids being f
discharged, the Town constructed a basin at its effluent discharge point in the Little River to trap
solids which is cleaned on a regular basis. Communication with United Industries led to the
Town paying for Dr. Bill Glover of United Industries to come to the Princeton WWTP to make
adjustments to the boat clarifiers. A report of the work done and information provided by Dr.
Glover was sent to Kenneth Schuster, Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor. The Town of
Princeton requests remission of the $3,000 civil penalties assessed for weekly and monthly
_. �-y ) c?
ii ; tel: _� _.-. •. _ • � i,i
138

S ,
NPDES permit violations for BODS and TSSruv"4l*J dVW rY Iwk [iID.
0ms9en, *R"*-Ty ci�o►reot�ps
A problem with the chlorine gas injection system was discovered by Envirolink soon after they
took over operation of the WWTP on February 1, 2001. The problem resulted in too much
chlorine being unknowingly injected into the effluent. After unsuccessful attempts to correct the
problem, the chlorine gas system was replace with a chlorine liquid system. The Town of
Princeton o®quest remiaMon-off ZI250cMl penalty lnr�1RDE� godWN,
W 4esidual Jprin ¢ue ion f;a0Ih& the viollabons.wm.inaa*.&OWL#
#4 Problem was
promptly resolved.
The Town of Princeton asks for remission of the $75 civil penalty assessed for failure to monitor
��. temperature due to the fact that it was monitored but was inadvertently left of the DMR. An
amended DMR will be submitted with the temperature information included.
The Town of Princeton respectfully requests that you remit the $4,366.00 in civil penalties
assessed to the Town of Princeton WWTP for the month of February, 2001.
Sincerely,
v
William E. Ormond
Mayor
13y

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
DEC 1 3 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7000 1530 0002 2100 2670
The Honorable William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Princeton -WWTP
Case Number LV 01-228
NPDES Permit Number NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have decided to modify the initial civil penalty
assessment of $4,366.00 to the total amount of $4,291.00.
Should you choose to pay the modified penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will argue
against any reduction of the assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to -be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda of an upcoming Committee meeting.
�n�
NCDENR
it
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

If the Town determines that noncompliance at the wastewater treatment plant is due to the
plant's inability to treat the wastewater, then the Town has the option of requesting a Special
Order by Consent (SOC) if the Town intends to upgrade the treatment plant. In this event, you
should contact Ken Schuster at 919/571-4700 in the Raleigh Regional Office to discuss and
obtain an SOC application.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919/733-5083,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
Sincerely,
J if/

AGENDA ITEM: ©� ' / l'� Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Town of Princeton (LV 01-276)
Johnston County
EXPLANATION: On August 17, 2001, Ken Schuster, Division of
Water Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor
for the Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of
$3,797.73 ($3,750.00 civil"penalty, plus $47.73
investigative costs) against the Town of Princeton
for violations of NPDES Permit No. NC0026662
and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6).
On October 11, 2001, The Honorable William E.
Ormond requested remission and waived the Town
of Princeton's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality- opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Town of
Princeton's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and did not find grounds to
modify the initial penalty assessment of
$3,797.73.
i �9

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment e •
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor. NCDENR.
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary �� �COW`p N,�,L �.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL Agust 2D9 2001
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William Earl Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P.O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215. 1 (a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0026662
Princeton VWW'P
Case No. LV 01-276
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in
the amount of $3797.73 ($3750.00 + $47.73 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Princeton.
This assessment. is based upon the following facts: a review has been
conducted of the discharge monitoring report (I)MR) submitted by the Town for the
month of April 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of
the discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit
NC0026662. The violations which occurred in April 2001 are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter. It was also noted that chlorine was reported as " 0".
Please ensure that nondetectable levels are reported as less than the detection limit of
the method used r
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of
Princeton violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit
NCO026662 and N.C.G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in
Attachment A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums
established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
iV 3
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1626 Telephone [phone]o FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post- consumer Pape

Mayor Ormond
Page 2
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of -law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Division of Water
Quality Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Princeton:
For l of the violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
B-QD•
S For of the _I violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
M.
$ For 3 of the —A violations of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
B4D.
$ :50-6 . For Z of the violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
S_ dtD For '2 of the �violations of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in '
violation of permit weekly average effluent limit$.for
fecal coliform.
S 3 %;:�6 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
S 47. Enforcement costs.
1

Mayor Ormond
Page 3
S 32773 -
7. . TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of Harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health.,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
2. Submit a written request for ;emission -or mitigation including a detailed
justification for sucb request:
' r ,
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and

Mayor Ormond
Page 4
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of
Ms.Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that a information presented in support of a request for remission
must be' submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision in the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
0:
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
r
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the fora of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original
petition with the
/y(

Mayor Ormond
Page 5
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
aiLd
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failufe to exercise one of the options above within thim days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
/y7

Attachment A '
Princeton WWTP
Johnston County
April 2001
Limit Violations
Month]y Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Reported Value
Limit
Units
BOD
39.5*
16
mg/1
TSS
65.5*
30
mg/I
Weed►� Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Week of
Resorted Value
Lim11
Ih&
BOD
4/1
72*
24
Yng/I
TSS
4/1
124*
45
mg//I
BOD
4/8
32*
24
MSA
TSS
4/8
64*
45
mg/1
Fecal
4/8
480*
400
colonies/100m1
Fecal
4/15
1978*
400
colonies/100m1
BOD
4/22
31 *
24
mg/1
* = limit violations that were assessed a civil penalty

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OP ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. NCO026662
TOWN OF PRTNCETON WWTP
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 01-276
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling $3797.73 for violation(s) as
set forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor dated
August 20, 2001 the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts arc as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the 5th day of
h:lnova\prince.ly
October , 20 01
ADDRESS
William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
PO Box 67
Princeton NC 27569
TELEPHONE
[phone]
/vG

I TOWN OF PRINCETON
�- 1MavorCommiaskRners
William E. Ormond 116 S. Pine Street Walter Martin, Jr.
PO Box 67 David StarlhM
Mayor Pro Tom Princeton, North Carolina 27669 Larry y Withrow
Eddie Haddock
PHONE: [phone] *FAX: [phone]
Town Clerk Chief of Police
Maria Ashworth Edward Lewis
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�srrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrarrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
October
(-V,
Ms. oleen Sullins
W er Quality Section Chief
ivision of Water Quality
16 77 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty for
Violations of NC General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NG492 6-"--
Princeton WWTP AJ&024(e2
Case No. LV 01-276
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter transmits a request for remission of civil penalties assessed against the Town of
Princeton WWTP in the amount of $3797.73 for violations of NPDES Permit NCO026662 in the
month of April, 2001.
The Town of Princeton was first made aware of a problem with solids being discharged with the
effluent on February 2, 2001 after Envirolink, Inc. took over the operation of the Princeton
WWTP on February 1, 2001. John Boykin, President of Envirolink, and his staff immediately
began changes at the WWTP to reduce the amount of solids being released which included
throttling back the influent pumps and running the oxidation ditches at lower levels. Envirolink
also began studying the WWTP design and operation manuals to identify the source of the
problem that was causing the release of solids. Included in their investigation was contact with
United Industries, the manufacturer of the boat clarifiers used at the WWTP, and a technical
assistance visit from NCDENR. During the investigation as to the cause of solids being
discharged, the Town constructed a basin at its effluent discharge point in the Little River to trap
solids which is cleaned on a regular basis. Communication with United Industries led to the
Town paying for Dr. Bill Glover of United Industries to come to the Princeton WWTP to make
adjustments to the boat clarifiers. A report of the work done and information provided by Dr.
Glover was sent to Kenneth Schuster, Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor. The Town of
Princeton requests remission of the $3750.00 civil penalties assessed for weekly and monthly
NPDES permit violations for BOD5, TSS and fecal coliform due to the fact that immediate action
was taken to lessen, identify and correct the problem.

The Town of Princeton respectfully requests that you remit the $3797.73 in civil penalties
assessed to the Town of Princeton WWTP for the month of April, 2001.
a
Sincerely,
(](5�
William .Ormond
Mayor
15 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
-DEC .i 3 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7000 1530 0002 2100 2687
The Honorable William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
NCDENR
NORTH C.AROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N UURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Princeton -WWTP
Case Number LV 01-276
NPDES Permit Number NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found grounds to modify the civil penalty assessment of $3,797.73.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable
to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will argue
against any reduction of the assessment. r
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.-C. 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
15A
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
50 % recycled/10 % post -consumer paper

date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda for an upcoming Committee meeting.
If the Town determines that noncompliance at the wastewater treatment plant is due to the plant's
inability to treat the wastewater, then the Town has the option of requesting a Special Order by
Consent (SOC) if the Town intends to upgrade the treatment plant. In this event, you should
contact Ken Schuster at 919/571-4700 in the Raleigh Regional Office to discuss and obtain an
SOC application.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919/733-5083,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
153

AGENDA ITEM: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Town of Princeton (LV 01-344)
Johnston County
EXPLANATION: On September 25, 2001, Ken Schuster, Division of
Water Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor
for the Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of
$3,485.23 ($3,437.50 civil penalty, plus $47.73
investigative costs) against the Town of Princeton
for violations of NPDES Permit No. NCO026662
and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6).
On October 11, 2001, The Honorable William E.
Ormond requested remission and waived the Town
of Princeton's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Town of
Princeton's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and did not find grounds to
modify the initial penalty assessment of
$3,485.23.
zr,
1.6-V

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
MAt•.
�; NCDENR
NORTH C^ROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NmuRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William Earl Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P.O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
September 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation ,and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215. 1 (a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO026662
Princeton WWTP
Case No. LV 01-344
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in
the amount of $3485.23 ($3437.50 + $47.73 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Princeton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been
conducted of the discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town for the
month of May 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of
the discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit
NC0026662. The violations which occurred in May 2001 are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter. It was also noted that chlorine was reported as "0".
Please ensure that nondetectable levels are reported as less than the detection limit of
the method used. _
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of
Princeton violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit
NCO026662 and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in
Attachment A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums
established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
155
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Eaual Onoortunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mayor Ormond
Page 2
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Division of Water
Quality Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Princeton:
$ lZ For of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
BOD.
For ,/ of the I_ violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
TSS-
$ For �_ of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
Fecal coliform.
$ G For of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
BOD.
$ 3ZZ , Sa For �_ of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in -
violation of permit weekly average effluent lim}ts for
Ste
g• /
$ For Z of the violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
fecal coliform.

Mayor Ormond
Page 3
$ For S of the _5 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily minimum effluent limits for
pH.
$ 3137. S6 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 47.73 Enforcement costs.
$ 3 `f 95. �3 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources. of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and -Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
J57

Mayor Ormond
Page 4
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether: `
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of
Ms.Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decisiondn the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
459

Mayor Ormond
Page 5
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
15013 of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original
petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within the days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this, matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at-919-5714700.
ZS ?lamL4, wa
(Date),' Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
ATTACHMENTS Division of Water Quality
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
I.S 1

Attachment A
Princeton WWTP
Johnston County
May 2001
Limit Violations
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Reported Value IhAi
n't
BOD
19.5* 16
mg/l
TSS
42.9* 30
mg/1
Fecal coliform
236 200
colonies/100m1
Weekly Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Week of
Reported Value
Limft
Units
BOD
5120
25
24
mg/l
TSS
5/20
81 *
45
mg/1
Fecal
5/20
6300*
400
colonies/100m1
Fecal
5/20
19,278*
400
colonies/100m1
Daily Minimum Limit Violations
Parameter
Date
Reported Value
Limit
lhiiLs
pH
010508
5.76
6-9
S.U.
pH
010514
5.54
6-9
S.U.
pH
010517
5.76
6-9
S.U.
pH
010521
5.87
6-9
S.U.
pH
010522
5.94
6-9
S.U.
* = limit violations that were assessed a civil penalty
A6

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7000 1530 0002 2100 2694
INELM
i � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/QURAL RESOURCES
DEC 1 3 2001
The Honorable William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Princeton -WWTP
Case Number LV 01-344
NPDES Permit Number NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found grounds to modify the civil penalty assessment of $3,485.23.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable
to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these -
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will ague
against any reduction of the assessment. '
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
7
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.--C. 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Ecival Onnortunity Affirmative A^_tinn F.mnlnver 51)Sr. reeveled/1tl% post -consumer nnner

date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda for an upcoming Committee meeting.
If the Town determines that noncompliance at the wastewater treatment plant is due to the plant's
inability to treat the wastewater, then the Town has the option of requesting a Special Order by
Consent (SOC) if the Town intends to upgrade the treatment plant. In this event, you should
contact Ken Schuster at 919/571-4700 in the Raleigh Regional Office to discuss and obtain an
SOC application.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919/733-5083,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
Sincerely,
Greg J. orpe, Ph.D.
16a

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF. RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMIMSTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. NCO026662 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
TOWN OF PRINCETON WWTP )
FILE NO. LV 01-344
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling $3485.23 for violation(s) as
set forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor dated
Sept. 26, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the 5th day of October , 20 01
Z�5y
�BY
William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
PO Box 67
Princeton NC 27569
TELEPHONE
h:\nova\prince2.ly
/6-3

TOWN OF PRINCETON
William E. Ormond 116 S. Pine Street Walter Martin, Jr.
PO Box 67 David starting
Mayor Pro Tam Princeton, North Carolina 27669 Larry Withrow
Eddie Haddock
PHONE: [phone] a FAX: [phone]
Town Clerk Chief of Police
Marla Ashworth Edward Lewis
lfNif!!f f f!f N!lNNNNNlN!!!!!!!NlNfNf iff!!if!!f NflRf!llfNflN!!«fNNNN!!!!!!!f!!!f!f!lN/NNNNIf
October 05, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty for
Violations of NC General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit N696266,2- Poo 2LG�Z
Princeton WWTP
Case No. LV 01 344
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter transmits a request for remission of civil penalties assessed against the Town of
Princeton WWTP in the amount of $3485.23 for violations of NPDES Permit NCO026662 in the
month of May, 2001.
The Town of Princeton was first made aware of a problem with solids being discharged with the
effluent on February 2, 2001 after Envirolink, Inc. took over the operation of the Princeton
WWTP on February 1, 2001. John Boykin, President of Envirolink, and his staff immediately
began changes at the WWTP to reduce the amount of solids being released which included
throttling back the influent pumps and running the oxidation ditches at lower levels. Envirolink
also began studying the WWTP design and operation manuals to identify the source of the
problem that was causing the release of solids. Included in their investigation was contact with
United Industries, the manufacturer of the boat clarifiers used at the WWTP, and a technical
assistance visit from NCDENR. During the investigation as to the cause of solids being
discharged, the Town constructed a basin at its effluent discharge point in the Little River to trap
solids which is cleaned on a regular basis. Communication with United Industries led to the
Town paying for Dr. Bill Glover of United Industries to come to the Princeton WWTP to make
adjustments to the boat clarifiers. A report of the work done and information provided by Dr.
Glover was sent to Kenneth Schuster, Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor. The Town of
Princeton requests remission of the $3437.50 civil penalties assessed for weekly and monthly
NPDES permit violations for BODS, TSS and fecal coliform due to the fact that immediate action
was taken to lessen, identify and correct the problem.
/4 4(

The Town of Princeton respectfully requests that you remit the $3485.23 in civil penalties
assessed to the Town of Princeton WWTP for the month of May, 2001.
Sincerely,
illi m E. Ormond
Mayor
i6 S

AGENDA ITEM: 0.2 — Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Town of Princeton (LV 01-361)
Johnston Countv
EXPLANATION: On September 24, 2001, Ken Schuster, Division of
Water Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor
for the Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of
$1,297.73 ($1,250.00 civil penalty, plus $47.73
investigative costs) against the Town of Princeton
for violations of NPDES Permit No. NCO026662
and G. S. 143-215. 1 (a)(6).
On October 11, 2001, The Honorable William E.
Ormond requested remission and waived the Town
of Princeton's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Town of
Princeton's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and did not find grounds to
modify the initial penalty assessment of
$1,297.73.
!6�,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
f
A �A�K� 4
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
CERTIFIED MAIL September 26, 2001
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
William Earl Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P.O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO026662
Princeton WWTP
Case No. LV 01-361
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in
the amount of $1297.73 ($1250.00 + $47.73 enforcement costs) against the Town of
Princeton.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been
conducted of the discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by the Town for the
month of June 2001. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of
the discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit
NCOO-M662. The violations which occurred in June 2001 are summarized in
Attachment A to this letter. It was also noted that chlorine was reported as "0". .
Please ensure that nondetectable levels are reported as less than the detection hmit of
the method used.
r ,
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that the Town of
Princeton violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit
NCO026662 and N.C.G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in
Attachment A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums
established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Eaual ODnortunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mayor Ormond
Page 2
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Division of Water
Quality Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against the Town of Princeton:
For of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit monthly average effluent limits for
TSS-
$ For 2 of the 2_ violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit weekly average effluent limits for
TSS-
$ For l of the 5 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily minimum effluent limits for
dissolved oxygen.
$ For _ / of the 1 violation of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0026662, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily minimum effluent limits for
pH-
$ �Z ' TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 47.73 Enforcement costs.
$ & TOTAL AMOUNT DUEoill
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b), which are:
%6&

Mayor Ormond
Page 3
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose&nlher enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
W
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request fgr remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request 1.
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by"a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
2 82. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the. petitioner;
16 ti

Mayor Ormond
Page 4
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms.Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision in the
matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental
Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original remission request
considered by the Director and therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and
thorough statement in support of your request for remission.
M
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If yau wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original
petition with the f -
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
and
176

Mayor Ormond
Page 5
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-5714700.
2tl 2W/
(Date enneth Schuster, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
ATTACHMENTS Division of Water Quality
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
1-7/

Attachment A
Princeton WWTP
Johnston County
June 2001
Limit Violations
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Reported Value limii
lhiiLs
TSS
42.4* 30
mg/1
Weekly Average Limit Violations
Parameter
Week of
Reported Value
UMA
JLnits
TSS
June 10
52
45
mg/1
TSS
June 24
53.5
45
mg/1
Daily Minimum Limit Violations
Parameter
Date
Reported Value
LiMA
lhiiLs
pH
010618
5.95
6-9
S.U.
D.O.
010604
3.1
>5.0
mg/1
D.O.
010605
2.6
>5.0
mg/1
D.O.
010606
2.5
>5.0
mg/I
D.O.
010607
2.3
>5.0
mg/1
D.O.
010608
2.3
>5.0
mg/1
* = limit violations that were assessed a civil penalty
/'7,�-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. NCO026662
TOWN OF PRINCETON WWTP
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 01-361
Having been assessed civil penalties totalling $1297.73 for violation(s) as
set forth in the assessment document of the Water Quality Regional Supervisor dated
Sept. 26,2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby
waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the
facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all
evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director
of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new
evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the
notice of assessment.
This the 5th day of October , 20 01
h:lnovalprince3.ly
ADDRESS
William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
PO Box 67
Princeton NC 27569
TELEPHONE
[phone]
;73

;I� A `` ,1; #. f„ ""k I # MAN
MAY2C Cornmisskiimm
William E. Ormond 116 S. Pine Street Walter Martin, Jr.
PO Box 67 avid starling
Mayor Pro Tom Princeton, North Carolina 27569 Larry Withrow
Eddie Haddock
PHONE: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
Town Ckrrk Chief of Police
Maria Ashworth Edward Lewis
fOfoffRRtrRRpRRRRppfRfffRRIRRf trRf$ffRfpRlfplMRRRffORRfffRRRRRpfRp#fffRfffNRRiffRfRRMRRRfR\fRfNff/fffRRNRRRffRR
October 05, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1617
Subject: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty for
Violations of NC General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit WC1002662-- NCcO ZL6 62-
Princeton WWTP
Case No. LV 01 -61
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Sullins,
This letter transmits a request for remission of civil penalties assessed against the Town of
Princeton WWTP in the amount of $1297.73 for violations of NPDES Permit NCO026662 in the
month of June, 2001.
Thd Town of Princeton was first made aware of a problem with solids being discharged with the
effluent on February 2, 2001 after Envirolink, Inc. took over the operation of the Princeton
WWTP on February 1, 2001. John Boykin, President of Envirolink, and his staff immediately
began changes at the WWTP to reduce the amount of solids being released which included
throttling back the influent pumps and running the oxidation ditches at lower levels. Envirolink
also began studying the WWTP design and operation manuals to identify the source of the
problem that was causing the release of solids. Included in their investigation was contact with
United Industries, the manufacturer of the boat clarifiers used at the WWTP, and a technical
assistance visit from NCDENR. During the investigation as to the cause of solids being
discharged, the Town constructed a basin at its effluent discharge point in the Little River to trap
solids which is cleaned on a regular basis. Communication with United Industries led to the
Town paying for Dr. Bill Glover of United Industries to come to the Princeton WWTP to make
adjustments to the boat clarifiers. A report of the work done and information provided by Dr.
Glover was sent to Kenneth Schuster, Raleigh Regional Water Quality Supervisor. The Town of
Princeton requests remission of the $1250.00 civil penalties assessed for monthly NPDES permit
violations for TSS due to the fact that immediate action was taken to lessen, identify and correct
the problem.
i 7 �

The Town of Princeton respectfully requests that you remit the $1297.73 in civil penalties
assessed to the Town of Princeton WWTP for the month of June, 2001.
Sincerely,
P.r m /on �i
Mayor
7.5

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
DEC 1 3 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7000 1530 0002 2100 2700
The Honorable William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
I VICK;%
'91
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Princeton -WWTP
Case Number LV 01-361
NPDES Permit Number NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found grounds to modify the civil penalty assessment of $1,297.73.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable
to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these,
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will argue a
against any reduction of the assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
1'7 h
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N..C. 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/]0% post' -consumer paper

date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda for an upcoming Committee meeting.
If the Town determines that noncompliance at the wastewater treatment plant is due to the plant's
inability to treat the wastewater, then the Town has the option of requesting a Special Order by
Consent (SOC) if the Town intends to upgrade the treatment plant. In this event, you should
contact Ken Schuster at 919/571-4700 in the Raleigh Regional Office to discuss and obtain an
SOC application.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919/733-5083,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
Sincerely,
r�
/if

AGENDA ITEM: 02.- 13 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Town of Princeton (PC 01-015)
Johnston County
EXPLANATION: On November 21, 2001, E. Shannon Langley,
Division of Water Quality Point Source
Compliance/Enforcement Unit Supervisor, assessed
a total penalty of $2,089.34 ($1,500.00 civil
penalty, plus $589.34 investigative costs) against
the Town of Princeton for violations of NPDES
Permit No. NC0026662 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6).
On December 27, 2001, The Honorable Donald B.
Rains requested remission and waived the Town of
Princeton's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Town of
Princeton's request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and did not find grounds to
modify the initial penalty assessment of
$2,089.34.
178

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
AM
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND N/QuRAL RE3ouRcrs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 7, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mayor William Earl Ormond
Town of Princeton
P.O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
Subject: Notice of Violation
Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement
Princeton WWTP
NPDES Permit NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
Mr. Kirk Stafford of this office observed wastewater residual solids in Little River at the
discharge point of the subject facility on February 2, 2001. This is a violation of the subject
permit for improper operation and maintenance, failure to notify the Division, and failure to
cleanup the solids from the creek. It is noted that Mr. John Boykin, of Envirolink Inc., informed
this office of the violation on February 2, 2001 when he took over operation of the facility. He
stated that he discovered the solids in the river the first day of his company's operation of the
facility. The past operator, Hydro Management Services, failed to inform the Division. Based on
Division concerns after discovering solids in the Little River, this office is conducting a review
of facility monitoring records.
We request that the Town of Princeton produce copies of the following items for the
subject facility. The records requested are for the period January 1, 2000 to the present.-Tlease be
prepared to relinquish these copies for our permanent files.
1) Visitation logs
2) Any and all laboratory results along with chain of custody records
3) Process control monitoring records
4) Calibration records for on -site testing equipment (pH, residual chlorine, dissolved oxygen,)
and results
5) Maintenance records
6) Any other relevant information associated with data reported for purposes of complying with
;1PDES permit requirements
/%l
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Telephone [phone] FAX (919)571=4718
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Princeton
Page Two
In addition, please indicate when the facility began and ended discharging solids to the
river, what caused the discharge, what was done to repair the problem, what steps were taken to
prevent future recurrence, and why the Division was not notified as specified in the subject
permit. Any response to this notification will be forwarded to the Director for his consideration
in any enforcement action.
Please submit this information to this office within 20 days of receipt of this letter. If you
have questions concerning this notification, please contact Mr. Kirk Stafford at 919-571-4700
ext 236.
Sincerely,
cc:Kirk Stafford
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
/S0

TOWN OF PRINCETON
Mayor Commissioners
William E. Ormond 116 S. Pine Street Walter Martin, Jr.
PO Box 67 David starling
Mayor Pro Tom Princeton, North Carolina 27569 Larry Withrow
Eddie Haddock
PHONE: [phone] a FAX: [phone]
T� Clerkghief of Police
Maria Ashworth Edward Lewis
�•N♦4Y� � NNiNKlAak�ktt4�AfNK�N�Klfrii��K!lK/�if�K�lIIIKfNIfNf►NNNMKti!l�lN�@NKMNKtd
March 13, 2001
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699-1628
Dear Mr. Schuster,
In response to the Notice of Violation and Notice of Recommendation for Enforcement dated
February 7, 2001 which requested copies of reports for the Princeton Wastewater Treatment
Facility NPDES Permit NC0026662, the Town of Princeton sends the enclosed reports under the
cover of this letter.
Also enclosed is a copy of a letter the Town of Princeton received from Hydro Management
Services, our facility operator through January 31, 2001, that was requested to aid in our
response to your request for information. Accompanying their letter are additional report copies.
We realize there may be duplications in the information provided by Hydro Management
Services and the Town of Princeton but we want you to have all the information necessary to
conduct your investigation.
The Town of Princeton employed the services of Hydro Management Services through January
31, 2001 to operate its wastewater treatment facility. On August 30, 2000, Ted Cashion of your
office performed a Compliance Evaluation Inspection of our facility. Your letter in reference to
this inspection does not note the presence of solids in the Little River. It is the Town's belief that
the solids observed by Kirk Stafford on February 2, 2001 were discharged beginning after
August 30, 2000 and ended at approximately 7:30 a.m. on February 1, 2001 when they were first
observed by John Boykin of Envirolink, Inc. Mr. Boykin and his staff took measures at the
wastewater treatment facility immediately to stop the discharge of solids. Your division and the
Town were notified at the same time of the presence of solids in the Little River. Envirolink,
Princeton's employees and contractors hired by the Town took immediate action and removed
30,000 gallons of solids from the river and transferred them to the sludge drying beds at the
wastewater treatment facility. Your division was not notified by the Town of Princeton prior to
February 2, 2001 because 'no member of the Town Board or any Town employee was aware that
solids were being discharged into the Little River. Mr. Boykin has also advised the Town, in 1
writing, that our inflow and infiltration problems (1&1) need to be corrected to prevent the future
possibility of the treatment plant becoming overloaded and solids being washed into the effluent
as a result. The Town of Princeton has applied for and received a loan from the Construction
Grants and Loans section to repair these I&I problems. Currently were are waiting for approval
of our rehabilitation plans so that the work may be bid and contracted and the repairs made to
our collections system.

Sincerely,
NVill am E. Ormond
Mayor
WEO/mha
Enclosures

A?Eyyi
r
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
70001530 0002 2100 2663
November 26, 2001
The Honorable William E. Ormond, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, North Carolina 27569
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Town of Princeton - WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO026662
DWQ Enforcement Case PC 01-015
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Ormond:
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against the Town of Princeton in the
amount of $2,089.34, including $589.34 in enforcement costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This action was taken
under the authority vested in me pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver,form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
or
/�- ICA
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

2. -Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request.
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of
the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any .of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by
a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached
waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement that you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; ,
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission must be
submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision
in the matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case
status, directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions.
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of
the original remission request considered by the Director and therefore, it is very
important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of your request
for remission.
Q
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request�an,
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of
Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. You must
/s v

l
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
end
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Daniel C. Oakley
General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days as evidenced by a date stamp (not
a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action.to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may be levied for future violations that occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at (919) 733-
5083, extension 532.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor w/ attachments
Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Sincerely,
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
r
/85

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE
TOWN OF PRINCETON
FOR VIOLATION OF:
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO026662 AND
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTE
File No. PC 01-015
FINDINGS AND DECISIONS AND
ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL
PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, I, Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the
following:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. The Town of Princeton is a municipality organized and existing under the laws of the State
of North Carolina.
B. The Town of Princeton operates a 0.275-MGD wastewater treatment plant located off NCSR
1002northeast of Princeton in Johnston County, North Carolina.
C. The Town of Princeton was issued NPDES Permit No. NCO026662 on June 23, 2000
(effective August 1, 2000, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003) for the treatment of
wastewater and the discharge of treated wastewater to the Little River, classified WS-IV NSW
waters in the Neuse River Basin.
D. On February 2, 2001 DWQ staff performed an inspection of the facility in response to a report
of solids in the Little River at the Town of Princeton's wastewater discharge point. A large
amount of sludge was observed in the river just below the discharge point and extending
approximately 100 feet downstream, and the facility was discharging significant amounts of
solids. No sludge was observed upstream of the discharge point. Samples collected upstream
of the discharge showed concentrations of BOD and TSS. at 6.0 mg/l and 2.0 mg/l,
respectively. Effluent samples collected showed concentrations of 23 mg/1 and 80 mg/l
respectively. Downstream of the discharge showed concentrations of 610.0 mg/1 and 6,000
mg/l respectively. DWQ was notified of this incident prior to the inspection.
r
E. Condition II.C.2 of NPDES Permit NCO026662 requires that the permittee shall fit all times
properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related
appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the
conditions of the permit.
JR6

t F. Previous enforcement actions against the Town of Princeton are as follow:
Case Number
Date Assessed
Total Amount Assessed
LV 01-W
March 7, 2001
$2291.00
LV 01-066
March 7, 2001
$2291.00
LV 01-228
July 3, 2001
$4366.00
LV 01-245
July 20, 2001
$2791.00
LV 01-276
Av ust-17, 2001
$3797.73
LV 01-344
September 25, 2001
$3485.23
LV 01-361
September 24, 2001
$1297.73
LV O1-452
October 30, 2001
$2411.41
G. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $589.34
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. The Town of Princeton is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to G.S.
143-212(4).-
B. NPDES Permit No. NC0026662 is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. Condition H.C.2 contained in the subject permit is a term, condition, or requirement of said
permit.
D. Little River constitutes waters of the State within the meaning of G. S. 143-215.1(a)(1)
pursuant to G. S. 143-212(6).
E. The Town of Princeton violated Condition D.C.2 contained in NPDES Permit No.N00026662
on or about February 2, 2001, by not properly operating and maintaining the treatment plant,
thereby allowing excess amounts of solids to be discharged to the Little River, WS-TV NSW
waters in the Neuse River Basin.
F. General Statute 143-215.6A(a)(2) provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty five
thousand dollars ($25,000) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or
fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S.143-215.1.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against the Town of Princeton
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
H. The Acting Director of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, has the authority to
assess civil penalties.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
18 7

III. DECISION:
j
Accordingly, the Town of Princeton is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 5 o o For ' I of one (1) violation of Condition D.C.2 of NPDES
Permit No. NCO026662 for failure to properly operate and maintain
the treatment plant.
$ 589.34 Enforcement costs.
$ r .D q . 34 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken into account the
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over which
the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
I%;L) o 1 061.,VL
(Date) Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director, Division of Water Quality
/'� S�'

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF JOHNSTON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
TOWN OF PRINCETON
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCO026662
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 01-015
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $2,089.34 for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality dated,
Nwe m 6 r Nn. a W1 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil penalty, does
hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above-state&matter and does
stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must
be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty (30) days of
receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request
will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the
11 0�)T"& M-a 11-41 WgRM
Signature
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
J

TOWN OF PRINCETON
Mayor
Donald B. Rains 116 S. Pine Street
PO Box 67
Mayor Pro Tom Princeton, North Carolina 27669
Eddie Haddock
a
Commissioners
Walter Martin, Jr.
David Starling
Larry Withrow
PHONE: [phone] a FAX: [phone]
Town Clerk Chief of Police
Marla Ashworth Edward Lewis
lfif f!!RlAfAffAAAAlAAi!!lllffl/ffifflA!!!!lAKlAfAlf!!f!N!#lffMffMf!!f!A!!f!!fllAfA!!f!!!!!!R!M!f!llfAM!!!N
December
M . Coleen Sullins
a!er Quality Section Chief
ivision of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1
Town of Princeton - WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO026662
DWQ Enforcement Case PC 01-015
Johnston County
Dear Ms. Sullins,
The Town of Princeton respectfully submits this letter as a written request for remission of the civil
penalty assessed against the Town of Princeton.
On February 2, 2001, the DWQ staff was notified by Envirolink, Inc. on behalf of the Town of Princeton
that there was a large amount of sludge in the Little River below the Town's effluent discharge point and
that the effluent being discharged contained a significant amount of solids. Envirolink, Inc. took over
operation of the Town's WWTP on February 1, 2001 from Hydro Management Services. The Town of
Princeton had no knowledge prior to February 1, 2001 of the WWTP not operating properly. The
employees of Envirolink, Inc. and a local contractor, Haddock Enterprises, immediately began clean up
of the solids in the Little River under the supervision of the DWQ. The Town spent $13,551.85 cleaning
the solids from the Little River and constructing a rock basin below the effluent cascade. This rock basin
traps solids discharged with the effluent before they reach the Little River and is cleaned on a regular
basis.
In addition to immediately cleaning the solids from the Little River and constructing the rock basin, the
Town of Princeton and Envirolink, Inc. began investigating the reason an excessive amount of solids was
being discharged with the effluent. Changes at the WWTP to reduce the amount of solids being
released, which included throttling back the influent pumps and running the oxidation ditches at lower
levels, were made the first week of February, 2001. Envirolink, Inc. also began studying the WWTP
design and operation manuals to aid in identifying the source of the problem that was causing the
release of solids. Included in their investigation was contact with United Industries, the manufacturer of
the boat clarifiers used at the WWTP, and a technical assistance visit from NCDENR. Communication
with United Industries led to the Town paying $3,583.85 for Dr. Bill Glover of United Industries to come to
the Princeton WWTP in June, 2001 to make adjustments to the boat clarifiers. A report of-thevprkerle._
and information provided by Dr. Glover was sent to Kenneth Schuster, Raleigh Regionai-Nplor Qualit
Supervisor.
i9Z)

:~
Dr. Glover advised the Town that it would take approximately two to four weeks for the results of his work
to be seen. The operation of the WWTP did improve marginally after Dr. Glover worked on it, but it was
not working as well as was expected. The Town hired C. T. Clayton, PE, the engineer of record when
the WWTP was built in the mid 1980's to assist with improving its operation. Mr. Clayton worked with
Envirolink, Inc. as they drained each oxidation ditch and clarifier for inspection and repair. When the
oxidation ditches were empty of water, a large amount of sludge, dirt and sand were found on the
bottoms of the ditches and below the boat clarifiers held together by polymer. This accumulation under
the boat clarifier was preventing it from operating as it was designed. The Town of Princeton paid
Envirolink, Inc. $23,000 to clean and clear the oxidation ditches and boat classifiers and make
adjustments to the clarifier settings for it to work properly. Mr. Clayton has also submitted requests on
behalf of the Town of Princeton to DWQ to make modifications to the boat clarifiers and change the size
of the influent pumps to maximize the operation of the WWTP and prevent solids from going out with the
effluent should it malfunction in the future. The Town of Princeton has paid Mr. Clayton $4,267.95 as of
this date for his services.
Illustration of Clean -Up and Repair Expenditures
ESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE AMOUN
Initial Clean-up of the Little River
$13,551.85
Dr. Glover, United Industries
3,583.85
Envirolink, Inc.
26,224.40
C. T. Cla on '
4,267.95
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$47,628.05
As of the second week of December, 2001, the WWTP is working properly and discharging within its
permitted limits. The Town of Princeton submits this information to you in support of its request for
remission of the civil penalty assessed in the amount of $1,500 due to the fact that the Town has spent
$47,628.05 to clean-up and correct the operational problems at the WWTP.
Sincerely,
elt- - 17
Donald B. Rains
Mayor

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D, Acting Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7000 1530 0002 2100 2939
The Honorable Donald B. Rains, Mayor
Town of Princeton
P. O. Box 67
Princeton, NC 27569
Al
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
MAR 12 2002
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Town of Princeton - WWTP
Case Number PC 01-015
NPDES Permit Number NCO026662
Johnston County
Dear Mayor Rains:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found grounds to modify the civil penalty
assessment of $2,089.34.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable
to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will argue
against any reduction of the assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
a
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Afrwmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda for an upcoming Committee meeting.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919/733-5053,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc:
Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
l93

LAB N
BW4368
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
'•» C?kSX > ':<'•>
...........................................::
'• :::::.:::.::.;:. <s<'' > E'•>E>#'•>E'•'•> »::'• '•j: ';'•> :>>:.>`:a?>E«>::z::E:>:;::•:
�::::::::::::...................................:.....:.:::::.::::::::::..:.......................................:.::mod.:::::...........
»>`Ei#::::<:E:E<E:;:.;::.:,`::..:>r;'• ;: i::::>E:>E?;<:::< s :::»>':,;:.>:»>E:<::<i »»:
:;::::::•..;::: >:::: »>:>s s::: s : ...... : s>;>::<:
FfiS EYt�t}�..............:.::::::::::::::::...::...............
»:>;::.;.;>:>:»:•::•;:;:.;.;::::::;:::::.;;;:;:.:
786.196
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0 U 55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-W2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1 U 115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION _
10.0
U
50.29.3
DEF
2.5 U I50-50-5
FOIEX
2.0
U
299-03-3
DEMETON
2.5 U 6923-224
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.8 U 300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1 U 56-38-2
NAILED
4.0
U
60-51.5
DIMEfHOATE
3.5 U 298-00-0
EMYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-044
DISULFOTON
1.0 U 298-02.2
METHYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-W5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3 U 299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE U 3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0 U 13071.74-9
SULFOTEPP
d-3
U
563-12.2
ETHION
1.3 U 7786-34-7.
TERBUFOS
I.I
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0 U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
1597260.8
ALACIILOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
aM-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113-48-4
MGK 264
5.7
1912.24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67.1
MOUNATE
2.1
314-40-9
13ROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
23184-66-9
BUTACIII.OR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
2008-41-5
BLITYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMEI'ON
2.5
101.21.3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-196
PROMETRYN
2.4
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
21725A6-2
CYANAZINE -
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
2921-88.2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1OW70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2
957.5I-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
759-94A
EPTC (EPTAM)
.2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
22224-926
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
51210-45.2
METOI.ACIItAR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETEC'.
TOL Tafget Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T T..ntatively Identified. not confirmed
E Egtimated Value
COMMENTS:
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
1
SUPERVISOR
REPORTED BY
AP
DATE
CHECKED BY
GB
t8W368
REVIEWED BY
KK
ENTERED BY
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
DATEOV
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
.......... ... .. ....... ................ .
...........
. ..
... .
. ............... .........
.............
... .. .........
.............. I
. ...........
.
.
.....
..........
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00.2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEIIYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
IIEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BlIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
IIEPTACIILOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58.89-9
B"C-CAMMA(LlNDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
11EXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CIILORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATRION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
MErHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-W5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CIILORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
Cl I LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-98-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189145-6
CIILORanIALONIL
0.03
U
117-1"
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD,OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD.PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
1I097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFANI
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
9001-35-2
TOXAPIIENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
3
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
.... ..
...... ....
..... ..........................
0
.................
x.
..................
.........
....... . . . . . . ... ....
X.
......
.... ......
.... .
...........
..........
............
..........
...........
.... ..........
...
.......... .......
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DIC"LORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
Ni
133-904
CIFLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2.4-D
1.60
N
IM02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPTIENOL (PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918.00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2.4.5- T
0.75
.14
3,5 DICIII-OROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4.5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

Fnr t.,.h r:cn r1Nr_V
DIVISION ENVIRONM NTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTYff
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BAST
❑ AMBIENT
❑
❑
REPORT T ARO F MRO RRO We WIRO WSRO TS
QA
MUAM
EFFLUENT
AT BM
K-lamOF
Other
PLIANCE
❑CHAIN
LAKE
❑
INFLUENT
CUSTODY
❑
Shipped by; Bus Courier, Itaff, Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Lab Number:
Date Recelve •
Time:
Rec'd : From: B-Courler-Ha d Del
DATA E TR Y: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): 4Tyk9q
STATION LOCATION: .� L c/ D 1J n r ) CA 0��
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus (///L !�' �d�/
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # lDate�Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Tlmp- Begin Date End ITIme EndiDevtft DM 1311 DOM I Value Type I Composite Sampl y
�L V
1
BOD5 310 mg/l
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
S
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/l
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color -(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/l
A H L
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag- ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca Calclum 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
T S B I U G IGNXX
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1 '
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodlum 929
mg/1
Arsenlc:Total 1002
ug/i
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
Oroanoohomhorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics I
Acid Extractable Oruanlcs
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mg/I
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 1.
82244 1 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpltlon On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severlty
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
[eanStream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
4
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number :
8 W4368
W❑ SAMPLETYPE
Date Received:
6/19/98
COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
Time Received:
9:00 AM
RIVER BASIN:
❑ AMBIENT
QA
X❑ STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
Received By
1G
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Oti ee
X❑ COMPLIANCE
El CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY
El ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
3
Date Reported:
7/23/98
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: UT TO COWAN COVE CRK
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station 0
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End
Depth - DM, DB, DBM
VAIue Type - A, II, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980616
0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31613 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg(L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 in L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinityto pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 rills,
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalenl Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

LAB # BW4367
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB
PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES
BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
:...............
AB....
:.;....... .. ..
��<'t`Attf,'�fC't�kli'�)f3Mi��>?�?����''>z2�>�����>���'•E:>:;.?::;'•'•'•�'•::'>".'����>�o>:`••�s>`:�>`�>z�>s'..<
..........
�>'�':#'•>':#'•><�`>F��?>E�'::.:......:.,:
�:.: ..::::::::.;�>>'':�><i">:'•>:'•>``•>:���'z�<z�:>?��<z'�''>E��F;'�#'•#<�`�:;.;<?:;:<<:
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50-29.3
DEF
2.5
U
M50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22.4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333,41.5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73.7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NAILED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMEIHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
EIHYLPARATHION
0.7
U
298-04.4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
ME-MYLPARATIIION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-94-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24.5
- RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64.5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
363-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
778634-7
TERBUFOS
1.1 -
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
15972fi0-8
ALACHLOR
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
31440-9
BROMACIL
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
200841-5
BUTYfATE
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
1134-23.2
CYCLOATE
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
333-41-5
DIAZINON
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
759-944
EPIC (EPI'AM)
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5121845-2
METOLACHLOR
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to Instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
3.4 N
21087-64-9
1.1 N
113.48-4
0.8 N
2212-67-1
3.4 N
15299-99-7
4.8 N
27314-13-2
2.2 N
1114-71-2
6.5 N
16I0-I8-0-
4.2 N
7287-19-6
2.4 N
23950-58-5
2.5 N
13940-2
1.0 N
122.34-9
0.5 N
1014-70-6
2.8 N
340WIS-1
2.3 N
5902-51-2
1.2 N
886-50-0
5.7 N
1929-77.7
4.2 N
MEIRIBUZIN
1.6
MGK 264
5.7
MOUNATE
2.1
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
NORFLURAZON
7.1
PEBULATE
6.7
PROMETON
2.5
PROMERYN
2.4
PRONAMIDE
7.6
PROPAZINE
1.0
SIMAZINE
1.1
SIMEIRYN
2.2
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
TERBACIL
4.4
TERBUTRYN
1.4
VERNOLATE
0.6
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quentitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTED BY AP PIP
CHECKED BY GB/mil'
REVIEWED BY KK klL.
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. 8W4367
SUPERVISOR
DATE '
ENTERED BY
DATE
DATE
15972-648
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-9
ENDRIN -
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
7644-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57.3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-99-9
BI1C-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-I
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-95-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765.80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-T7-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501.15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
I.00
U
2921.88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897.45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-I8.0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861.32.1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53.19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674.11.2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72.54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
II104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
II141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55.9
DOE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCILOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
i' ........................................................................:::::::::::::::::::::::::fat,,.::::.......
.....................................................................................................::.....:.:...:.::.::::::.::::::::::::::::..;:..:....................................................................:::.::..�:::.�.�
si < .................
:<: ;: •::::::::: •::::6:;:::::>:::'• :: E:;::::::::<:> :::::E:E:>##:'•#a::'•
.Ei? iEi..... 4ER0IC�D&...................
::,..•::;: <> <:#::::.:...,•:..,:::::•?:
..DL`f.P. D
G7'8.:......:.::...::..�:::::::::GASR:.::::::::::::::::ItERflEC[DH::::::::.::::::::•::::::..;.............:..::.:::.:�::.
s: :: < :> #::::::>'•:: ,,,, •:;:> >:: :::: Isis
is E:3 :::: ;:.:;; :•;:•::<::::is isE:>::E:E::::> > >::#::EE>::;:?: '•E::' :;?;:;:::; ?:
:.::::::.......TaL...,..........T11iTEC3.7LD....
?E: >::::::>:.;
.:::.::::::.:::::
. .;;:.;:.;:;•;:•;;::<::;
.. ..�::.
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75.7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2.4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITFS)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5. T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

DIVISIORMF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATE
COUNTY !—/ LtAV,4­VVv.L4 PRIORITY
RIVER BAST
REPORT T : AR F O MRO R WaRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT
AT BM
Other PLIANCE
Shipped by: Bus CXWW
Ier EMERGENCY
COLLECTOR(S):
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑
R QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
SAMPLE TYPE
❑
ElEFFLUENT
QA
7—S'STREAM
❑
CHAIN
LAKE
INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY
❑
ESTUARY
Lab Number
oll�
Date Receive Time:
I
Rec'd b From: s- ourler-Ha d Del
DATA EN Y Vy. CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station # % l_
( mm//jd)
Tie Begin
Date End
Time EndDepth
M DBM
Value Type
Composite
Semple ype
lDqygln
� O t
yt
A H L
T S B
C_ G �NX_X_l
1
BOD5 310 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
2
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
Colltorm: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
4
5
Colltorm: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Colltorm: Tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
Colltorm: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
7
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
Volatile 505 mg/1
9
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
1s
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mgA
Turbidity 76 NTU
20
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBA 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 m9/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
CrChromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cut -Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag liver 1077 ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be-Berylllum 1012 ug/1
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Lithlum 1132 ug/1
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 un/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg•d)
Phytoplankton
Conductance at 25 C
ater Temperature (TD
mg/1
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8 3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
Sampling Point %
2
94
10
•
400 •
82244 431
82243 82242
20
Salinity %
Preclpltlon On/day)d
Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H can Stream Depth It.
Stream Width ft.
L480
45
32
36
1351 1350
35 64
4

COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
Other
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
. Estimated BOD Range:
Seed:
- Chlorinated:
Station H
Dole Begin (yy/mm/dd)
980616
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifarrn: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed.510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
.Fixed 540 mg/L
PH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to ply 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube .1100 mis
COMMENTS:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality '
p SAMPLETYPE
PRIORITY
AMBIENT
Ej QA
X❑ STREAM
EFFLUENT
XD COMPLIANCE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
2
Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Remarks:
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
ime Begin
T
Time End
Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Value Type- A,11, L
1015
0 1
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chia Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Baron
Tannin R Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium - ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
J
Lob Number 8W4367
Dole Received : 6/19/98
Time Received : 9:00 AM
Received By 1G
Data Released : AR
Date Reported: 723/98
Composite-T,S, I Sample Type
1

LAB # BW4366
PESTICIDES
REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE
PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
.00
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
MI-88-2
CHLORPYRIPOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTIIION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5,
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-224
MEVINPIIOS
1.9
U
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICIILORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ITIMYL PARA711ION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
�08
U
2497-07-6
DISULFUMN SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071.-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TFRBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
..
......
...47.............
.. ... . ..
... ......
... .
..........
......
. ..............................
. . ..
......
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
N
34-12-9
AMETRYN
1.1
N
11348-4
MGK 264
5.7
N
912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
2.1
N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
N
23194-66-9
BUTACTILOR
4.8
N
27314-13.2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
N
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5
N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
N
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
13940-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
N
MI-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
N
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-7041
SIMEMYN
2.2
N
957-51-7
DIPTIENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUTRIURON
3.1
N
759-94-4
EPIC (EFTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERHACIL
4.4
N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
1.2
N
886.50-0
TERBL'TRYN
1.4
N
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
N
5121845-2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
TOL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to Instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
8W4366
SUPERVISO
REPORTED BY
n p
AP fy
CHECKED BY
GB
DATE
REVIEWED BY
KK
ENTERED BY
1
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
DATE
��
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:.:::............................:..................................:::.:.............�Q............................:...:::::::::.::::........
..............
::::.:::.::::...............................
L.........
bt Tf Gt�3f.::.:::.....................
A�#................k
:.. :.::::::::::.:::::::::::.::.::::::::::::::::::::.........
ii ib..:.::::......................................:::::::::..
................
:.
7. .1Et3l1NV...................
a or ..............0
r ..........................
.G......................:...::.:::::::::;:.:.::::::::::
A1t tif4tl�tf!dt�?4�;.>:.;:<•>:.>:.»:.::.:>:.;:»::.::;;..»:.::.::.::;.:
El;::z::z:>::>::::::::»:?:>
:»>:::......
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
AIDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
EMAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BHC-GAMMA(UNDANE)
0.01
U
118-74.1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATMON
0.08
U
5103-71.9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72.43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2395-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CIILORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CIILOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETIIRIN
1.00
U
29,21-98-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189745-6
CHLOROTIIALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32.1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DOD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28.2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16.5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
- 53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69.1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.30
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-92-5
AROC ILOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.03
0.007
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
0.007
BODI-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.021
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
),
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
c•::-:
BLCIi)E.�:::::::::::.�:.�.�:::•:.�::::
:fQ�..:....
DEfHC1ED
....CASK• :.::::::::::::
:..�HEJIIIECEDL. ..�:::::::: :•:: :•:::::::::::::::::::::.
C L
::•::
nvL:iiiii:ti!i:!isi1nh4:VV/riFV.?>:::::::::{::$??:i{:;::iCL:isii:?:1tl
.y�y�1.N µµBA
:.
... .....:
8 •f:?:'::L<hil-Ilii::y:v::::<:[:ii
G.........:...::................,......;
iiiiii>:>$}?;{:}};:};:'riiix:::
'r:••:•; •; ••.,. �,. •,. '•' �`':••':};:;:>:::S:i>iri$iY'rT:?�?:::>::::::?:�ti•��`••$}?};{s�:�i:�'riii<:::::::�i:•`::
3iVtr�31 #E'GKthCilttSk, :.:.::.::.:::::::::::::::::.:.
..31....:•:::::::::..:.
„ ..v8d
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DIC11LORPROP
8.50
N
25057-BM
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85.7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90.4
CIILORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100.02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86.5
PENTACHLOROPIII-N01. (PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOUTFS)
0.36
N
1918-02.1
PICLORAM
Lou
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5-T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVFX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
I

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
C... 1.6 11.. f%Nr V
COUNTY U444C Tt&
PRIORITY
RIVER BAST
AMBIENT ❑
REPORT T ARO FR MRO RRO WaRO W1RO WSRO TS
QA
AT BM
'C❑ OMPLIANCE
CHAIN
Other
OF CUSTODY
[:)EMERGENCY
Shipped by: Bus Cnu 1 ,Stalf, Other
COLLECTOR(S):
STATION LOC TION:
.Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑
REMARKS:
2
Station
iDat%4.qgln (yy/mm./dii)
I Time Begin
I Date End
1 I I BODS 310 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /looml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 mg/]
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
SAMPLE TYPE
�jj
TREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
❑ ESTUARY
Lab Number:
Date Recelve Ime: 1
Rec'd From: s-Courier-Hen Del
DATA E TR BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Time EndlDep/h DM BDBM I
Value -type
(\ L A H L
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromlum:Tota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/l
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Ag- Ilver 1077 ugA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
npoalte
T S B
Sample ype
C G
NXX
L1-Llthlum 1132
ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodlum 929
mg/1
Arsenic -Total 1002
ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acld Herbicides I
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
2
94
10
300 •
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipltion On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction ODeg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
4ean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width fL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
_. t
I i �_

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Wnter Quality
Lab Number :
8W4366
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received:
6119/98
COUNTY
RIVER BASIN:
BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
❑ AMBIENT QA
STREAM
Time Received:
9:00AM
KI
El EFFLUENT
Received By
1G
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Once
O COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released ;
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
1
Date Reported:
7/23/98
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station H
Dale Begin (Jy/mm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End I
1
Depth - DM, DB, DB111
Value Type -A, H, L
Composite-T, S,
Semple Type
980616
1000
0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /IOOml
Coliform: MT Total 31504 1100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /Ioomi
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.3 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "A 00 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Crewe and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 -mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P'665 mg/l.
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
IV -Vanadium ug/L
AS- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
JUL 2 7 1,77,

DIVISION?OFPATER QUALITY
Chemistry
Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number :
8 W3776
\V SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received :
6/4/98
COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
Time Received:
8:55 AM
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT
QA
X❑ STREAM
EFFLUENT
Received By
HMW
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
COLLECTOR(S)
HANER
3
Date Reported:
7/15198
Estimated BOD Range:
Slnlion Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station 0
Dale Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Dale End (yylmm/dd)
1
Time Begin
1
Time End I
Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Value Type - A, 11, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980602
.I
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /l OOml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colifomt Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
260 mg/L
730 ug/L
5 mg/L
5 mg/L
E
ignin ugfL
Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l.
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickcl 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1645 ug/L

DIVISION O ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY SA LE TYPE
RIVER BASIN W ❑ QA EAM ❑ EFFLUENT
(D
REPORT TO: RO MRO RRO WeRO WiRO WSRO TS KEIA IENTOt BM ❑ LAKE ❑ INF1 t1ENT
Other PLiANCE ❑CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Co r r, Stalfif, Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): C/
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # , / r\ to Dete 1 . (yyLmm/rid) Time Begin Date End Time End Dept DM D DBM Value Tvp,
i
1
BODS 310 mg/I
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Coior:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness T6tal900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Fn 1 wh Ile. 11ml V
Lab Number:
Date Recelved: 0 Time:(/
Rec'd by: I/MwFrom:
Bus- ourle -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
A H I.
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P, Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmium 1027 ug/I
CrrChromlum:TotaI1034 u9/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 u9A
2 W 5°S3
Composite
T S B
Samp Type
G GNXX
LI-Llthlum 1132 ug/1.
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
Arsenic -.Total 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 USA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)'
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Aridity
Air Temperature IC)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 10
400 .
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpitlon (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
145 132
136 11351
1350
135
64
4
nmilno.A—A fnial.

REPORTED BY
K A K �iL.
CHECKED BY
AD Aq
REVIEWED BY
KAK QAC
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. BW 776
SUPERVISOR
DATE
ENTERED BY l
DATE
159R-648
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421.93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPIIA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
7644-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86.8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(UNDANE)
0.61
U
118-14-1
IiEXACIILOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-15-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE-ALPIIA
0.02
U
7243-5
. METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CIILORNEB
0.03
U
2688048-8
OXYCIILORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETIIRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1997-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURAUN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11.2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-53-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, Oil
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
0.012
37324.23.5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
0.017
8001-35.2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.040
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
5
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:.......
:i::::::E:::%E?;'•E..................................................................................?.............................................................................................................::....:................................?#....................................
N
.... ?QIICii��..................... .......................
(.:.........
:F !............................
!�5i1!-.:..::.....;...;..
?fit tp :': ::i'; ? ;:;<:: ::: E'•:: EE :`•E :?:::`•E'
#E'•E:. E% `:`':?
: %:ti :k '':if E? :::
:s::<:;TA'RGEI;GOT4Ctl
...
ND>::%%:::S:::S:4:::5::....,
##'i'y'''"' :..:::.
::>: t'Tt 3::::':::
>::::::::53:#?::: ?:`•::'r:<?'5
:: ::;:: ThiEGES CF75t::•::;•MIS::.......::2 ::::
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36.5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CIILORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2.4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87.86-5
PENTACHLOROPIIENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918.00.9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5-T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2.4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # BW3776
PESTICIDES REPORT- DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
I
2921-W2
50.29-3
298-03-3
333-41-5
62-73.7
60-51-5
CARBOPIIENOTIIION
CHLORPYRIFOS
DEF
DEMEPON
DIAZINON
DICIILORVOS
DIMETHOATE
-
1.0 U 55-78-9
1.1 U 115-90-2
2.5 U M50-5
2.5 U 6923.224
0.8 U 300.76-5
2.1 U 56-38-2
3.5 U 298-MO
.............................�.....:.:::::::::::::::::::
FC•NTIIION
FENSULFOTHION
FOIEX
MEVINPHOS
MONOCROTOPHOS
NAILED
EMYL PARATHION
2.0
10.0
2.0
1.9
10.0
4.0
0.7
-e,
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
298-04-4
2497.06-5
2497-07-6
2104-64-5
563-12-2
13194-48.4
DISUIFOTON
DISULFOTON SULFONE
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
EPN
M110N
ETHOPROP
1.0 U 298-02.2
2.3 U 299.94-3
NE U 3689-24-5
4.0 U 13071-74-9
1.3 U 7786-34.7
2.0 U
METHYL PARATHION
PIIORATE
RONNEL
SULFOTEPP
TERBUFOS
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
1.5
1.5
0.8
0.3
1.1
U
U
U
U
U
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-%S
834-12-8
1912-24-9
314-40-9
23194-66-9
2008-41.5
5234-68.5
101-21-3
1134-23-2
21725-46-2
2921-88-2
333A1-5
957.51-7
759-94-4
22224-92.6
51235-01-2
51218-05-2
ALACHLOR
AMETRYN
ATRAZINE
BROMACIL
BUTACIILOR
BUTYLATE
CARBOXIN
CHL.ORPROPHAM
CYCLOATE
CYANAZINE
CIILORPYRIFOS
DIAZINON
DIPIIENAMID
EPTC (EPTAM)
FENAMIPIIOS
IIEXAZINONE
METOLACIILOR
3.4
1.1
0.8
3.4
4.8
2.2
6.5
4.2
2.4
2.5
1.0
0.5
2.8
2.3
1.2
5.7
4.2
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
21087-64-9
113A8-4
2212.67-1
15299.99-7
27314-13-2
1114-71-2
1610-18-0
7287-19.6
23950-58-5
139-00-2
122-34-9
1014.70-6
34014-I8-1
5902-51-2
886-50-0
1929-77-7
METRIBUZIN
NICK 264
MOUNATE
NAPROPAMIDE
NORFLURAZON
PEBUTATE
PROMErON
PROMETRYN
PRONAMIDE
PROPAZINE
SIMAZINE
SIMETRYN
TEBUTTTIURON
TERBACIL
TERBUTRYN
VERNOLATE
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
1.6
5.7
2.1
2.6
7.1
6.7
2.5
2.4
7.6
1.0
1.1
2.2
3.1
4.4
1.4
0.6
DETECTED
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this Compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
COMMENTS:
E- Estimated Value
'
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but
not det elted

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
W❑ SAMPLETYPE
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
❑ AMBIENT QA
O STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
❑ EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
2
Lob Number 8W3775
Date Received : 614/98
Time Received: 8:55 AM
Received By : HMW
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station H Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBN1 Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, Sample Type
980602 0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /looml
Coliform: MFTotal 31504 /looml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /looml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
JUL I T iqq�
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 - ug/L
Pheophytin a32213 ug/L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin 8 Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
A]- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

'DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WAT For Lab Use ONLY
ER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY (.L PRIORITY SA LE TYPE Z
RIM BAST ❑ ❑ QA REAM ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT T : ARO F O MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS AMBIENT
AT BM
Other OMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courle , Staff, Other EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
OL RS•
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
COW
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Lab Number: (�/3
/
Date Recely d. �9
Time
Reed b :Hmid From: Bus- ourler Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station #/ Dete Begl ym/dd) Time
Begin Date End Time End Dept DM B D(M Value Type Composite ISamp Type
/► f A H L T S B G)GNXX
1,
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
nn
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mg/l
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Cd•Cadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr•Chromlum:Tota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 u9A
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
ZrrZlnc 1092 ugA
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/I
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Llthlum 1132 ugA
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/l
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophowhorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
II Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
JlPurgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1•
400 is
82i" 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity R
Preclpitlon (In/day)
Cloud Cover R
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width fL
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. BW3775
REPORTED BY
KAK
SUPERVISOR
DATE
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
AD
KAK
ENTERED BY ►-
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
9
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-60.8
ALACIILOR
0.10
U
72-20.8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-93A
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETIIAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76- 4-8
IEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-W8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
B11C-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103.71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765.80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880.48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501.15-6
CIILOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1916-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT. OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT. PP -
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPIIENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
6
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
o-s:•:::s:::•:::::-;:;::: ::;:::;<;:..
:..:.........................................................................?tii....................7G$5N•tlkel)tCtR>
.'.r......:::>::;:?::i:':::::::::`•:i:::.i>:::::::33#:Clii'C'C.1'1
............................
:•;:;:.;:<.>::.>;;;::r:;:•:.:::•....;:•;:•;:•;:<•:•;:o;:•;:-;;:o;:-;:
........................................................
......................................................................
:-;:.;:::;:.:•::<.;:�
1...............tk7Ci>
............................................................
%::zfAROECC<4Ptl NI3:::::::::::YY:::;:i:::::ii:::::..0
.....................................6.I*...............g...................................:.:..
:'•':::!>'•'•'•'•>'•>SE'•?>
.............a
:.:`>'.<'#'.'••.'•E'•>'•>#E'•E'•<'•>'•>S#::'��>>IEEE?'r'•.`•?nE.::>:::?%z:<;?:>:>:>:>:::<:>:<:?`•3».>
1L..................................
..
TARG ND «<`f ::2•.`•�>#32>`:>:»:::`<<:
xx-X:...... ET.0 ...:..::------•----- ::.:..:...:.:LgIL..:.;.,..........;..;......::
>:>:?s#>E'EE<E:':'•>:%'??':
................1L�
50594-66.6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPIIENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93.76-5
2,4,5.T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3,5 DICIILOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
;::i>:::::::;x::i5:`::::::: A5t3::i:::.....
&i4iP.�.H::g::::#isS#%:?::s3:`•:::::#%:�:::::::� �::i::::::i#:::
• .".t::3
rr...............::::::::::•.
.......................::..::.:::::.fv.....
�::::. �::::::::::..;....:::::::::::::.:::......:.:...:..:::::::::::::•.
::::::::......
�::::::::.: �:::•::::::. �:
.:::: •::•:::::::.:::.:;;::::.::•::•::...................................................:.:.....:::.::
::.T;•>;•:;•:
::::::::::::3::::<+:u•'
• •: 8/i.
R.................................:....
.7',KR(Z'F' CQM3?AUNA............ .
....................................................
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
I50-50-5
FOIEX
298-03-3
DEMETON E
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
33341-5
DIAZINON
, 0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
62-73.7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56.38-2
NAILED
60-51.5
DIMEINOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
EMYL PARATHION
298-044
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
MEI7LYLPARAT1110N
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PRORATE
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
NITROGEN
PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
314-40-9
BROMACIL
231W66-9
BUTACHLOR
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
I01-21.3
CHLARPROPHAM
I134-23-2
CYCLAATE
2172546-2
CYANAZINE
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
333-41-5
DIAZINON
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
759-94-4
EPTC(EPTAM)
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
51235-04-2
I IEXAZI NONE
51218-45-2
METOLACHLOR
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
3.4 N
21087-64-9
1.1 N
11348-4
0.8 N
2212-67-1
3.4 N
15299-99-7
4.8 N
27314-13-2
2.2 N
1114-71-2
6.5 N
1610-18-0
4.2 N
7287-19-6
2.4 N
23950-58-5
2.5 N
139-40-2
1.0 N
122-34-9
0.5 N
1014-70-6
2.8 N
34014-I8.1
2.3 N
5902-51-2
1.2 N
886-50-0
5.7 N
1929-77-7
4.2 N
LAB # 8W3775
2.0
10.0
2.0
1.9
10.0
4.0
0.7
1.5
1.5
0.8
0.3
I.
METRIBUZIN
1.6
MGK 264
5.7
MOUNATE
2.1
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
NORFLURAZON
7.1
PEBULATE
6.7
PROMETON
2.5
PROMETRYN
2.4
PRONAMIDE
7.6
PROPAZINE
1.0
SIMAZINE
1.1
SIMETRYN
2.2
TEBUTLLIURON
3II.1
TERBACIL
4.4
TERBUTRYN
1.4
VERNOLATE
0.6
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but
not detected
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number
S W3774
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received :
6/4/98
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
Time Received:
8:55 AM
RIVER BASIN:
❑ AMBIENT QA
XO STREAM
EFFLUENT
Received B�. :
HMW
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE El CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released*:
AR
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
I
Dale Reported:
6/25/98
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: U'r TO COWAN COVE CRK
L
-
Seed: Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station d
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Dale End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End I
Depth - DM, DB, DB111
Velue Type - A,11, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980602
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
Colifom: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbiditv 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube '7100 fills
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
I Icxavalcul Chromium ug/I.
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
IV -Vanadium ug/L
Ag. Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fc- Iron 1045 ug/L
t

DIVISIOM OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT For Lab Use ONLY
COUNTY �� %/�,.
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM MM1)
PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE ul
❑AMBIENT ❑ QA I� STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT
RIVER BASI v `
REPORT TO:
ARO UkO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
Otherer
Other
Shipped by:
L,
COMPLIANCE
❑EMERGENCY
❑
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
Bus COur r StatI, Other
Lab Number:
//JJ
Date Received: `7S Time: 09,
Rec'd by:
From: Bus ours -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S):
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 rng/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
/ I A H L
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmlum 1027 ug/1
CrChromlum:Tota11034 ug/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 u9/1
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
A9 liver 1077 ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
T S B I C( G , NXX
LI-Lithium 1132
ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929
mgA
Arsenic -Total 1002
ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organoplweplwtus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
I Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics I
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd) I
Phytoplankton
I
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 10
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1•
400 •
82244
82243 82242
20
Salinity %
Preclpition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
t431
Stream Flow Severurbidity
Severity
Wind Velocity M/i
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft
480
45
32
36
1351
50
35
64
4

REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SAMPLE TYPE:
KAK
G13
KAK K
WATER
ENR/DWO. LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
O.
LAB N8W47,74
SUPERVISOR
DATE
ENTERED BY
DATE
PtC
... ...................
. .....
....
KE.S
m
.........X
..............
.. .
...
ix
.
. ...
.............
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BlIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HFXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
MEMOXYCHL.OR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85.5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHL.ORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189745-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD,OP
0.06
U
12674-11.2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD,PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLJDR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE,0P
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
ARCCIILOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT.OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69.1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82.5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLJDR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
505944"
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50 N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40 N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
'0.50
N
7600.50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00 N
94-75-7
2.4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00 N
94-82-6
2.4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP)
0.30 N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00 N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2.4,5- T
0.75 N
51-36-5
3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72.1
2,4,5-7? (SILVF-X)
1.50 N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

r
LAB # BW3774
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
::;::'JiSt; #: #::
:...:...............:.....:.:....
1+. • `Mi D :# :::5 `:::>:::::: #:::::: 33 ::# :`%;:
:.........:........:.......................................:.....41...............
:.::::...:.......:.........................................:....:...............................................................................................:...:.:..:.:..:.::.....:......:.......................a.............%....i�.
# ;#: ;:::::;:: 5: '.C' •,;s#2 3 :#
y3<3:p ::::...;•,::::. 3 :: i `:::::t:::::s:%:
....?...........................{r..5W....................
:'•' :':,:;•.::,:%t::::::'•:
; :::::..:::::.::>. is2::2:::i:::::::::::::::::::::::::: 3 :: ..........
?47...:.:.:......:....:............................
i?:;•,:.:: i ` :r'S:: #:::
::::::.::::
•:.; _::::::::::.::: :
.fiT .THU.::::
'..........:.
::::::::::::::::;::::::;::::`;:;:;:;:;'.::::;•.;
::::7ARGEC':ON13 C1:::N::::::::''•::::::`::#:#3::::`:•'::::::.<:::'r':S:o:if::5:%
•._ U
s:#:::::':<::::%':$::;::::::s::s::::::::``:3:::::::is::#%':::':;:::::::%.:::::
8fi.................0
1L.........................................................T7�R�.'G:�QKf�iUI�U,::;::;;:;•::::::•:::::::::::.�:::::.::•:
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-39-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2911-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50-29.3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
33341.5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOP110S
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2 -
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETIOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02.2
METIIYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06.5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PIIORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACIILOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6 N
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113-484
MGK 264
- 5.7 N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOUNATE
2.1 N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6 N
23194-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1 N
200E41-5
BLr YIATE
7.2
N
1114-7I-2
PEBUTATE
6.7 N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5 N
101.21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4 N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6 N
21725-6-2
CYANAZINE
7.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0 N
2921-8&2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1 N
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014.70-6
SIMETRYN.
2.2 N
937-51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
340I4-18-1
TEBUTI(IURON
3.1 N
759-94-4
EPTC (Et-Wt)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4 N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
88&50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4 N
5I235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOIATE
0.6 N
51218-45.2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

LAB #
BW4368
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
'• C7kSt>
:;;:•::•::•:•;:•:.....................................................:::.::::::::.:::::::..:.........
:.:..........................................,.......................................:::::.::::::
.....
:r> tt`:GbS:#::3 :: :# > ':'>iE '•E #>f `•
> : E<'•E'•E :`::,::: : #` >E %: : , E:>:?'•> :.:......:»:S:o:: #r"::::::::::>E :>?
... ............b Jlc}.::::::-*1..:::::...:...iASt....::......::::-RK�ti
..:.......:.............................................................:.....:................:::::........<......................................
•::.:i
IQ ....................::.:::::::::::.::::::::::::::.
...::.::::::...
.............37f
., ... ......
t tf b•::::
:............................................................................:..................................................................................................................................:............................................?................................
:>:z:::::>::>E::::::E:E:?::::::::>:«::;.......................................
......
o'1`f '.;.•::.•:,,:::.::.>::•.:.;-:: r :%#E#'•{.......
:::::'::EE'E t';"::: '•y'• }'' :` : >: # '• £ #E'•E'• •'•.'•S r'2 �%'•<'•?
..................a t:.:..:.:.:::::. :•:::::::::::::::::::. :::.. <::::::::.:xAltt?El.G4M
;•;:->::.;:.;:•;;;;;:•:;<•:;:;::t;:::: * � *5 "..':..::::: •'C ` 3'•
. :.:.:::::::..:::.::::::::::::.:::..
R�svNti....:.................................
<?5# ? `•>............:::::::'•
..........................::.o
::,'.:% r .1
786.19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0 U 55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
MI-99-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1 U 115-90-2
FENSULPOTHION _
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5 U 150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
293-03-3
DEMEfON
2.5 U 6923-22.4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.8 U 300-76.5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62.73.7
DICHLORVOS
2.1 U 56-38-2
NALED
4II.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5 U 298-00-0
TH
ETHYL PARATHION
J.7
U
298-044
DISULFOTON
1.0 U 298-02.2
METHYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-V,5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3 U 299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE U 3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0 U 13071.74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3 U 7786-34-7.
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0 U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60.8
ALACIILOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
BU-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
I1348-4
MGK 264
5.7
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-I
MOLINATE
2.1
3 W40.9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
23194-66-9
BUTACIRD11
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZ.ON
7.1
20D8.41-5
- BLITI'LATE
1.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
5234-68.5
CARBOXIN
6.5�
N
1610-IM
PROMETON
2.5
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
1134-23.2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
21725-06-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40.2
PROPAZINE
1.0
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2
957-51-7
DIPIIENAMID
2.8
N
34014-I8-1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
759-94.4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
22224-92.6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
51218-45-2
METOLACIILOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED
PEAKS DETECTED
TOL T:uget Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T 1„ntatively Identified, not confirmed
E Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
8W 368
REPORTED BY
AP �(-
SUPERVISOR
DATE
CHECKED BY
GS JjyI Q/�J
REVIEWED BY
KK
ENTERED BY
l
/ /
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
�� OV
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-450-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-042
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421.93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACIILOR
0.02
U
319-96-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-99-9
BIIC-GAMMA(UNDANE)
0.01
U
118.74-I
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103.71-9 -
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
MEMOXYCHL.OR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921.98-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHL.OROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1592-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-I14
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28.2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE. OP
0.05
U
11141-16.5
AROCHL.OR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5 /
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
3
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE
DETECTION
.:•::::::•::::::...........::::::.:.�:...............
:;:;:•::.;:.;:;;::.;;:.:::::::;
[OCIDE;ii:3:#::5:t:#i'fi::::::?:::
::::..::::::::::::::::::....::::::.::::::.::::::..::::::::::::.....................
i::i:2:Si:? 1:::;::i:::::DEiLC7
Q.........::.........:.......................................
EfJ»:•»:::;:»>:<.:rr:•:i:•::•:::•:.
...........................CASH::::.::•::<•::•:�:•:•::•:)
..:.............
..�:::.:: �::.:::::::.:::••::: •:::::::::::::•.::•:.:
IqlBECEDB:•::::::::.:.::...:::.:......::::::::::::::::.._:::.?
•.�:::::.. ;•:::::::::•::::.
L...............3J
..... .:-;:<.:
XXXXi'ARCpr`";::.:•::+••;;:;+'#`:
Cdht.QUNi7: r#
EE:E:;;::';)%?pE;?':EE+E'��ESAEi?fE',':`';:##<?'S:;:::;:;EE;<:#;%,,'r',E'••.'•,`•,
u e..
;...:.......nRt�lbMhCxUrip
E'•'•>2'•'•'•''.:'%r?p?:E;#:>:;:?EEE�?`'
:....:...................................
��/�•::::::::::.:::::::::::::•::.us!s
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
2.W7-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75.7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-87-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87.86.5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-I
PICLORAM
1.00
_ N
1918.00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5-T
0.75
N
51.%-5
3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93.72.1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

For Lab Use ONLY
DIVISION
ENVIRONM NTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY
12
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BAST
❑gMB1ENT
❑
AM
❑EFFLUENT
REPORT T
ARO F MRO RRO We WIRO WSRO TS
QA
AT BM
K-OMPLIANCE
El
LAKE
❑
INFLUENT
Other
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ESTUARY
Shipped by:
Bus Courier, toff, Other ❑EMERGENCY
Lab Number:
Date Recelve •152Tlme:
Rec'd From: B-i Courler-Ha d Del
DATA E TR Y- CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): / / , itQ
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: /l/l/i G/ �/
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # 113joe.,Begin (vvlmm/dd) I Time
Begin Date End ITIme EndlDeptfi DM DIS DAM I Value Type Composite Sampl y
61`1
1
BOD5 310
mg/1
COD High 340
mg/1
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616
/loom]
5
Collform: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
81 lResidue:
Total 500
mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color -(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
A H L
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
CrChromlum.Tota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ug/1
Ag- Ilver 1077 ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/]
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
T 1 S B I U G 1 GNXX
LI-Lithlum 1132 ug/1
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
i
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/i
Organochlorine Pesticides
Orva:wvhosvhorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
( Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH •
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

Lab Number 8W4368
Date Received : 6119/98
Time Received: 9:00 AM
Received By : JG
Data Released : AR
Date Reported: 7/23198
Composite-T,S, I Sample Type.
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO ARO Regional OBice
Other
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
Estimated BOD Range:
Seed: Chlorinated:
Station K Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd)
980616
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform:tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L'
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
\V SAMPLETYPE
PRIORITY
AMBIENT QA l STREAM EFFLUENT
l COMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
EMERGENCY ESTUARY
3
Station Location: UT TO COWAN COVE CRK
Remarks:
Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM TV
lueType - A, H, L
1010
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color. True 80 c.u.
Color: (pH) 83 pH- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium MWL
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fc- Iron 1045 ug/L

LAB # BW4387
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
::>::><:E ........................................................................................
h'S l tL�bl.....................................................
:.::....:
..::b Cl> A:......::.....:.
•:::::::::. :::::::::::::.::
...................................................
YF�tYt..................<......................................
.:..........
::;•;>::•;:;;.;;::•:-:.:::.::•::•::•:;:•::<:«•:.
:. AR47:C1#) .Ali:'•:::'::`:::;:: r?`•'
%'"''+?E?'•`•'''.:;:%,.,,3'%`<.''r''
:qla........................:..............:...:............7!4ltE.G�DM£`UEildll.:::.
'i?:.:::::>;:r;::.::;:::.;:;::%•'::i::.:?:?':`%'''£'•
:::::.::•::::::::::::::::::::::.:
?:?:::'•.%:<;:`x.3% i'''%6
. :::::::.:::::::.:::•.:::..
!l
78&196
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSUTFOIHION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
I50-50.5
FOLEX
2.0
U
29803.3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-224
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
33341.5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METTIYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06.5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84.3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-076
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563.12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
T'ERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION.
GR s!': ' ..;::17 176 :::::::: 5 •'• : ?: <?< `•"r:'• :' :'• :'• ::: `:">' ::< i' t: :`•::::;.: ,>::;.. • '• ... f3?'•' 5: ' ; .:.; •>:`: ; :'% 5 : '::: •::..::;:. # ::::: # : %'r'# E'•:`•}::% ;:; :3:: 'r :3 ::%:::: ? :::::::.:: E ::::::t ;: •:::::::..::::::.? :% :
:.............................>..Ga......:..:.:...:::.::.::::::::::::::::::::::::•.:::::•IQL:::::::•::::.....m.•::::::::::::::::::::::•::.:G s::::............ Tcea�E.............................................:.:.:
:1`'r sit'•>'•S�<'•E'•'•3'#�>::;;:6: •.`•2'•?'•'•>%?% t:;:::'#`•#?t:%<•,•'•;:;:_
!CL...............:.0.L...................::............................ TAR
.....................8....................................................::::::.:.....CET COM,Y,.QUN1?::.::::::.::.::::.::::::•:::::::::::::u9?is.::::::::::..::::::::::::.PB(L
15972-W8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
2108764-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6! N
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113484
MGK 264
5.7 N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
221267-1
MOLINATE
2.1 N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6 N
2318466-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1 N
2008-41.5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7 N
523468.5
CARBOXIN
6-.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5 N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-196
PROMETRYN
2.4 N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6 N
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0 N
2921-8&2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1 N
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70.6
SIMETRYN
2.2 N
957.51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
340I4-I8-1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1 N
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51.2
T'ERBACIL
4.4 N
22224-926
FENAMIPHOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4 N
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6 N
51218.45-2
ME 0LACHLOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED
PEAKS DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to Instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTED BY AP PAP
CHECKED BY GB
REVIEWED BY KK
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. 8W4367
SUPERVISOR
DATE
ENTERED BY J
DATE a a �vj
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN -
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-93.4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593.15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76.44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
- U
319-86-8
B14C-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57.74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
7243-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5.
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-98.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189745-6
CHUDROTHAL.ONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53.19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
I1104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11I41-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262 -
0.50
U
33213-65.9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
'�r>:::::::';;:>:: .....:::::::::::.............:
Q.� :•:•:::::::::::::::..:..................?a4.........DCI.isC1ED............................
:..:.::::::::11ERHFCEDfE......................................................
.............................
Q..
:::;:::a:»>::::::::::::::`•>:::>::::>:>IAk1i'�ht�Qli>u>:>:'s:<`_>":::«`:>:>:?::;..e
a .G.............a
a fG.:...............:.
:•
YfiRt1> !c1MP47a7�tr}...:...................................
u�ft ...::::::::::.:.:::::::::.1
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133.90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50.2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94.75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
10402.7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPIIENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02.1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBEN7.OIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72.1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

DIVISIOJPF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BAST ❑QA TREAM AMBIENT ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT T : AR F O MRO R WaRO WIRO WSRO TS j GGG ❑
AT BM ,11MPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other / OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Cou gw
er ❑EMERGENCY ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(.S): (�
STATION LOCATION:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yee ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # ID4ygln yy/mm//}� Time Begin Date' End ' Time End Depth . M DBM
��AVJ l�nllA�(J _ �/JI (/p lll/l/ L/(//. t (-�
1
--- --- -
COD High 340 mg/I
2
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
4
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
7
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
-I
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 9.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mgA
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm�
MBA 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/I
Lab Number
Date Recelve Time:
Rec'd b From: s- ourler-Ha d Del
DATA ENTRY CK:
DATE REPORTED:
A H L
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromium-Tota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag ilver 1077 ugA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/1
T S B
C G NXX
LI-Lithlum 1132 ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic. -Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosplwrus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable 0rgenics
Acid Extractable Organics
i
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Meter Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
2
94
Salinity %
10
Precipltlon Qn/day)
300 .
Cloud Cover %
400 •
Wind Direction (Deg)
82244 431
Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity
82243 82242
Wind Velocity M/H can Stream Depth ft.
20
Stream Width ft.
480
45
132
136
11351 1350
135 64
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Lnbormory Report / Wnler Quality
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
W❑ SAMPLETYPE
RIVER BASIN :
AMBIENT QA
X❑ STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
2
Estimated BOD Range.
Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated:
Remarks;
nation N J Date Be in ( /mm/dd)
D E d
g yy ate n (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBI17 Value Type- A,11, L
980616 1015 0.1
BOD 310 rng/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform:Colifor: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/l,
Fixed 510 mg/l,
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l,
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube *1100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l,
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/l,
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin K Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/l,
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/l,
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/l-
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Tota1.1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
Lab Number
8W4367
Date Received :
6119/98
Time Received:
9:00 AM
Received By :
i
1G
Data Released :
AR
Date Reported :
7/23/98
Composite-T, S, I Sample Type

LAB # BW4366
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWO. LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
78619-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
292I-88.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1:1
U
115.90-2
FENSUIFOTIIION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.3
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-224
MEVINPIIOS
,1.9
U
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCRQI.OPHOS
10.0
U
62.73.7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETHYLPARATIMN
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
P140RAT6
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071774-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563.12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN
PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
:ii:PES[7 : OE3::;:;:;::;:%;.:::::::::::::'::::::;::::#:3:::::5:;.
:•
::;:>CASR:r:>:s::::3:2:::i:#
TiGiDli:i::r:;:::::;•.::;i<::?<::::';:::;:?;:: `'::::::8;::?:.
.:
:.: ET1iC.
tJk9PAUN3)::<:::<::::?;:;::i::;:::i::'S::i
i.. .t..................e
.L.....-,..-..................:....................:....TARCEF.COAfF.QUN1?.........
........................0
...........
.........>tZL
15972.60.8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087.64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
N
834-12.8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
11348-4
MGK 264
5.7
N
19I2-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67.1
MOL114ATE
2.1
N
314-40-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299.99.7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
N
23184-66-9
BUTACIILOR
4.8
N
27314-I3-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
N
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
N
5234-68.5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5
N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
N
2172546-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
N
2921.98.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
N
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70L6
SIMETRYN
2.2
N
957-51.7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18.1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
N
759.94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TER13ACIL
4.4
N
22224.92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886.50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
N
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE -
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
N
51219-45.2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
n p
AP ry
GB
ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. BW4366
SUPERVISO
DATE
REVIEWED BY
KK �( M.
ENTERED BY 1
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE G
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U 72-20.8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-W2
ALDRIN
0.08
U 7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U 53494-70.5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U 2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U 76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U 1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89.9
BHC-GAMMA(UNDANE)
0.01
U 118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U 121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U 72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U 2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448.3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U 39765-80.5
TRANS-NONACIILOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CIILORNEB
0.03
U 26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
Cl I LORODENZI LATE
5.00
U 52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETIIRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U 1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTIIALONIL
0.03
U 117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861.32-1
DCPA
0.02
U 1592-09-8
TRIFLURAUN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD. OP
0.06
U 12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U 11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE. OP
0.05
U 11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE• PP
0.02
U 53469-21-9
AROCILOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U 12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U 11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
.0.02
U 11096-82.5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
0.007
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
0.007
8001-35-2
TOXAPIIENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.021
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
j
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
• l A : '
:::2'E':�:'��:.:.�..:...::•;....:..13Eft(1IG��
` :;:-;:•::-:>:::•:;:•; r •.`• 5 ?E' `•.`•
.........................................:.T
E::'f:%E:%?#`:`->::: :i Q
................:EG7ECl.::..:.::•::::•:::..:....CASE.................HERBEGEF......:::::.
::.........;:::.;:,
"::'::: :: `E :'• ::' ::<;::�:• :;:; ::2:;
.:.:........................ ..:::..�::::::::.
%:: 5:`:•::.;;;:•;:•;:-> :$ 5 :; ::: :: s:•'•o ? E :;::s;;:::i>;;;:;;:::;::;:;•;:•;:;::::<:5;:2;::;•:;•;;:•;;:;:;:.>:<;•;;;:•;:
...............................:..::::::::::::.::.....
.:_:...........................:.....:::.
................
::::.
..............:....:........:.:neEE....:.:::::..a
tR.:.�:::::......::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.�::::::::....:7 .. 8.....
...........
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N 120-36-5
DICIILORPROP
8.50
N
M7-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N 88-85.7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133.90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N 7600-50.2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N 100-02-7
4-NITROPHF..NOI,
4.00
N
94-92-6
2,4-DR
5.00
N 87-865
PENTACIILOROPIll:N011.(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOUTES)
0.36
N 1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N 93-76-5
2.4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36.5
3.5 DICIILOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N 93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (Sll_VI;X)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
c... I .t, r:.- nn:r v
COUNTY UA..LOA&
PRIORITY
RIVER BAST
AMBIENT ❑
REPORT T ARO FR MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
QA
AT BM
'C❑ OMPLIANCE
CHAIN
Other
OF CUSTODY
f,
[:]EMERGENCYY
Shipped by: Bus Cou I Staff, Other
�
COLLECTOR(S): �
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
STATION LOC TION:
Seed: Yee ❑ NOD Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑
REMARKS:
Station &
Date_P.egln (yy/mrq/dd)
I Time Begin
I Date End
1
BOD5 310
mg/1
COD High 340
mg/I
2
3
COD Low 335
mg/I
Collform: MF Fecal 31616
/100ml
4
5
Collform: MF Total 31504
/100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
/100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/100ml
8
Residue: Total 500
mg/I
Volatile 505
mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
SAMPLE TYPE
qj
TREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
❑ ESTUARY
}
V
Lab Number:
Date Recelve Ime;
Rec'd From: s-Courier-Hen Del
DATA ENTRY- BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Time EndlDep/h DM B DBM Value Type Composite Sample yp
l\ L l A H L T S B C G
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM[
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 2
uMhos/cm.
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmlum 1027 ug/I
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag- fiver 1077 ugA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
L -Lithium 1132
ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organoplwsphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mg/1
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature 00
2
94
10
300 1•
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpltlon On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Wean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width it.
480
145
132
136
11351
1350
135
64
14

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number :
8W4366
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received:
6119/99
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
Time Received:
9:00AM
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT QA
XD STREAM
EFFLUENT
Received By
1G
REPORT TO ARO Regional Once
X❑ COMPLIANCE El CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
1
Date Reported:
7/21198
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station 9
Date Begin (3y/mm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End I
Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Value Type- A, H, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980616
1000
O.I
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom[
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100mi
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100mi
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /1oomi
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chia: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 PH- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
.Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L.
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
IV
-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
JUL 2 7 1,7 7

COUNTY BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORTTO ARO Regional Office
Other
COLLECTOR(S) HANER
DIVISION?OF4ATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
PRIORITY
❑ AMBIENT QA
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
❑ EMERGENCY
1V SAMPLE TYPE
1-1 X 1 STREAM EFFLUENT
El LAKE INFLUENT
ESTUARY
3
Lab Number
8W3776
Date Received :
6/4198
Time Received :
8:55 AM
Received By
HMW
Data Released
AR
Date Reported :
7/15/98
Estimated BOD Range: Sintion Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station N Date Begin (3-/mm/dd) Dale End (p•/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth -DM, DB, D6111 Value Type - A, II, L CompositrT, S, Sample Type
980602 .I
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom[
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom[
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
PH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colifornt Total Tube /100 mis
COMMENTS:
Jul 17 nJ
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi e: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 7 1880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Flexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I-
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Tolal 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickcl 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
AS- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

.DIVISION O ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY SA LE TYPE
RIVER BASIN W KDA IENT Qp EAM EFFLUENT
REPORT TO`:Alia`FRO MRO RRO WeRO WIRO WSRO TSOt er �GINFLUENT
Other PLIANCE ❑CHAIN ❑LAKE
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Co r r. St f I : Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
C_OLLECTOR(S):%r�
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/401130 or 100 plus
STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yee ❑ No ❑ REMARKS: (�{�
Station Date Be In (yy/ Tlme Begin Date End
1 BODS 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I.
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
on
Turbidity 76 NTU
Time End
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 rug/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 tiMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/I
P., t w6 rr_., nrar v
Lab Number:
Date Received: tJ Time-D
Reed b ;I
From. Bus- ouile -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
A ' H L
NH3 as N 610 mg/l
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmfum 1027 ugA
CrChromlum:Tota11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/l
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
I/QCa) 5�53
tposlte
T S B
Samp Type
G�GNXX
LI-Lithium 1132
ug/I
Mg-Magneslum 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/I
Na-Sodlum 029
mg/l
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/I
�Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
rurgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd),
I I Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1 0
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition (In/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.Stream
r
Width ft
480
145
132
136
1351
1350 135
I
64
4
DMI/Revi.ea Yn/R6

REPORTED BY
K A K -+�AiL-
CHECKED BY
AD
REVIEWED BY
KAK JAC
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB N0. 8W 776
SUPERVISOR
DATE
ENTERED
DATE TE
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319.95-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
B14C-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118=74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57.74.9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE-ALPIIA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCIILORDANE
0.02
U
501-15.6
CH LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53.1
MIXED-PERMETIIRIN
1.00
U
2921-88.2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
I I ID4-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92-6
DOE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55.9
DDE. PP
0.02
U
53469.21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789.02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29.3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
0.012
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN It
0.01
0.017
9MI-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.040
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
5
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
?#..........................................................................................................................................:..:..::..?Q:.:::.::::.::.
>:::>:':>R�tCEkE'•::>::>:::::s:>>sE:>:>:<::>:::':`E:::;>::;?'>::z:«'"
U.....................................8.4...............G...................................................................................................................:::.:::..R
1L........................................................ThRGE1CUM.
ND..................................
t 1 L::::::::......;....;....::::4eglL
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25M7-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50.2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
_ 2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02.7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918.00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5-T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5.TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2 LAB # 8W3778
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
78619-6
CARBOPIIENOTIIION
1.0
U
............................:::.:�:-:_IIIO
_,�;,,_,�.:�....::>:;•:;�>•.>:•:;;:;.;:;:?;:;:i::::::;;:i:::!Q:S+,::::??::::<:i:it%:
?:f:ii:i`:;E ugi4
55-36-9
FENTIIION
2.0
U
2921.88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
50-29.3
DEF
2.5
U
I50-50-5
FOLEX
10.0
U
299-03.3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-2.2A
MEVINPHOS
2.0
U
333-41.5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
3p0.76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
19
U
62.73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
1.0
U
W51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
NAIED
4.0
U
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
�4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
1.5
U
299-84-3
PRORATE
1.
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
2104-64-5
EPN
RONNEL
0.88
U
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
561-12-2
ETIIION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
U
13194-4
8-4 ETHOPROP
2.0
1.1
U
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
::::::..... ..:•:::.........................:.:.:::::......................::
••:::::......................::.::::......................:.:::::......................::::.:.................::::::::..
...............
t�G.... ...
ga
15912-60-8
ALAC14LOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
MEIRIBUZIN
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
1.6
N
11348-4
MGK 264
5.7
N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-I
MOIINATE
314-40-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.1
N
23194-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
2.6
N
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-7I-2
PEBUfATE
71
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
6.7
N
101-21-3
CIILORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19.6
PROMEIRYN
2.5
N
t 134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950.58-5
PRONAMIDE
2.4
N
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
13940-2
76
N
PROPAZINE
1.0
N
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
I22-34-9
SIMAZINE
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
1.1 .
N
957-51-7
DIPlIENAMID
2,8
N
34014-I8-1
TEBUTFIIURON
2.2
N
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
3.1
N
22224-92.6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
4.4
N
51235.04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
1.4
N
51218-45-2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
06
DETECTED
I
N
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
Other
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
Estimated BOD Range:
Seed:
Chlorinated:
nation 0
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
980602
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom(
Coliform: MFTotal 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Suep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinityto pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
JUL i 7 iIN8
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
PRIORITY
AMBIENT ❑ QA
] COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
El EMERGENCY
W❑ SAMPLETYPE
l STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
LAKE
INFLUENT
El ESTUARY
2
Station Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Remarks:
Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a32213 ug/L
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin R Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
Value Type - A, H, L
0.1
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as-P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
AS- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
4Fe
- Iron 1045 ug/L
Lab Number 8W3775
Dote Received : 614/98
Time Received: 8:55 AM
Received By : HMW
Data Released AR
Date Reported : 7/15198
Composite-T, S, I Sample Type

DIVISIO-N OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER UALITY FI For Lab Use ONLY
. Q ELD-LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY (.L ' PRIORITY SA LE TYPE Z
RIVER BAST ❑ ❑ R❑ REPORT T : ARO F QA EAM EFFLUENT
O MRO RRO WaRO W1RO WSRO TS AMBIENT
AT BM
Other OMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courle ,Stall, Other EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
l �
COLLECTOR(S): (!C,
r(�Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: W " 1
Seed: Yee ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yee ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station X/V
Date We IV
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom[
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /loom[
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /loom[
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Time Begin I Date End ITlme
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytln a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
Lab Number (xJ 3
Date Recely d: o
Time:
Rec'd b : Njo From: Bus- ourler Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
DM B DrM I Value Type
t A H L
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr•Chromlum:Tota11034 ug/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zrr-ZInc 1092 ugA
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
mpoelte I Sa-r. Type
T S B G GNXX
LI-Llthlum 1132 ug/l
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/1
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
wW'Organophosphorus
Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
II Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acld Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd) I
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1•
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity R
Precipitlon (in/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/fl
can Stream Depth ft
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
BW3775
REPORTED BY
KAK
SUPERVIS IOR' '
DATE ( �'
CHECKED BY
AD�
REVIEWED BY
KAK
ENTERED BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
7
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
- a5;i'•E'•>#>
z:>::_•::.::;.<::;::«: »::>E :'• ;'•<'•E'•>E >z:z>#:r #:a:'•E>E::f::
.....::::::::::::::::::::::::.�•.::..:.................4......:::.........r..�::::::::::.::............
>:,•:::::>::»::>:::::;::::•;::::o..::;:}<>'>S>:>3>:>:::>
>::?<%:»::;:;:: >< ......
ASI...............:AES71
>:>•:.::::•:::::;.:>:«:::>s:»i>i>iis>S>:>:>;: >:»:«......:•»:::::;.;:;::.
1 :.
.::•>;»>:.;•:::.::.::::;•.�
.......
:;:•::•:
:..:::•::::::.::::..::•::::::::........................
.........:.....:::::::.�::::::..�
....................
r
:cg/L::.::::::.�:::tl8!L:.::::::::.::>::::::.::::..�.......
;::: ;::::: ..........................:::;::;.;•:;::::<;::
?::2::::'::... ': 3:r' 'r' ::`:;%
..ARP
.. .T EI'�`t)Ii4P.0i)71D.::::::;>:•>:•»:::.;�::::.�:::::::::::.::
f •::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.
15972-60.8
ALACHL.OR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETIIAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76.44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319.86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57.74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103.71-9
CIIL.ORDANE-ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CIILORNEB
0.03
U
26890-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CIILOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-I8-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
,. U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789.02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
%29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
6
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
..............
>`?>< liSX3»'::........E7?
:»>:>...................................:•:::::•:::::::::::::::::._
:...:...............................................................................................:::::::::::::::::•:::....:................................................................:.:::::.:::::..:::::.::::::.:.....................?..................R.:.
`>:'??E#:<'•>? :>:r'#<»%:....:::'::::::.>:'•;:;::::..:•..:::;-
:::.:.:...........
:....:........::::
4..........t5........................:::.Gi5R•::::::.::..:.:.HSst
Cj.:.....................................................................:.::.:....::
>>#.:::%:.;>:::«:.;,:.:,:>E::'•:':'::::<o-:E'::::::<:..,::.;:::'•>::>:i3>#:%>#:>':»»>::'•>::»>:<>:i':z>:::%::#>#:::<>:»::.:::::::»:<<:#>::.;•:::::::..-,:;::?:
&CCtR..,....:........:.......................................
i ..........:..:.A
.. .
:........::.:......CiET
GOMpEI(iN13.:.........:...................0
. •:::::::::::::
lf�...............g....
d)L......................:::.:::.:::::::::
....
::...........
:.........;ARGECCdAdPQIiND......................
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::•::
.....
:.;:::.;::::::::::::.:::::::::.
>grL ::.:....................y�g1L
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120.36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
- N
133.90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.OD
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPIIENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3,5 DICIILOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # 8W3775
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55.38-9
FENTHION
2.0
- U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOIEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON f
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
1 0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56.38.2
NAILED
4.0
U
60-51.5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
EINYLPARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
..............
..............
....::<:::>::.:.........:::.:::::::.:..........:..::::::::..:•.::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::1>7L...:.:.......bl1.CCfYi}:::::.::::.:::.::::.:::.i
::::.:::.::::::::.:::.:::.:.........................................................................:..:::.:.:.::::::::::..::::...:..........................................................:.........:.................................................::..
:..:::::::::.:::::::::..:.:.:.:....:.................................................................:::.:::::::::::::
•::.::.>•::;:f::f;•>::
ASS:::::::::::::::::1.fi5E5Cf[}8....................................................
.::.:..:................................................::.:::::::::::::::.........................................::.::..:L*1E1F�S.....
:::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.................
...............
::...::
. ... ......
b .
X.
,......,R ... :.::., .:
7.GGf.C.tlMRt'tINU::::::::::.:::.::::::.::::::::::::::.tl:::::::::::.::.::::::::::•::•::•:::::;:.;::.;:::.:::......::::..
•''•""'':::.s:2:#:.£::#
:::::.::::::::::::.::%`:.;•:%;•:;•:;•::<;::::::::>::>:•::•>:•:?:::;_ts2::#:::::::'r':::::.:;:;:::;::y.;:::.;:;:;:::';:':};:;.5;':;:
.::>:;;:::•>:•>:•;:•:•;:-;;.:.:::........::•.
741EG> 4.G4A!fiQUN1#....................::...:::::::::::::
.it::.:
::::::::::::::::::::::..::
::•::::::::.:::::::..o
rU
15972-60-8
ALACIILOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
N
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113-48-4
MGK 264
5.7
N
1917-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOUNATE
2.1
N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2,6
N
2318466-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
N
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5
N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287.19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
N
21725-46.2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
;.0
N
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
_ 1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
I
N
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
10I4-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2
N
957-51-7
DIPIIENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUTHIURON
3,1
N
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
59.02-51-2
7ERBACIL
4.4
N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
7ERBUTRYN
1,4
N
51235-04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
N
51218-45-2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not
detected
COMMENTS:

COUNTY BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
Other
COLLECTOR(S) HANER
Estimated BOD Range
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
PRIORITY
❑ AMBIENT QA
it COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
Seed: Chlorinated:
nation N Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd)
980602
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom[
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 me/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbiditv 76 N7'U
Coliform Total Tubc "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
l SAMPLETYPE
X❑ STREAM
EFFLUENT
LAKE
INFLUENT
ESTUARY
1
Station Location: UT TO COWAN COVE CRK
Remarks:
Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBI11 Value Type - A,11, L
0.1
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
I Icxavalcnl Chromium ugAL
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
Ak Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fc- Iron 1045 ug/L
LabNumbei 8W3774
Date Received : 6/4198
Time Received: 8:55 AM
Received By : HMW
Data Released : AR
Date Reported: 6/25/98
Composite-T,S, I Sample Type

DIVISION -OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT W For Lab Use ONLY
COUNTY �� /-�.
ATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE U
RIVER BAST
❑AMBIENT
❑
QA
I�I STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT T
: ARO IjRO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM ��
Other
RCOMPLIANCE
❑ EMERGENCY
El
CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
Shipped by: Bus Cour �r Stall, Other
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by:
From: Bus ourl -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: ! t �Q U(/ /�/ (/
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station #7DaU Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End ITIme End Dept DM DO DBM I Value Type I Composite Sample
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
n„
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tr! 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
I A H L
NH3 as N 610 mg/l
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromlum:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/i
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
T S B 1 C( G )GNXX
LI-Llthlum 1132
ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927
mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/1
Na-Sodium 929
mgA
Arsenic -Total 1002
ug/i
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
OrganophosphnNs Pesticides
I Acid Herbicides
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 9.3
2
94
10
300 it
400 is
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipitlon (In/day)
Cloud Cover 7G
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
14

ENR/DWO LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. 8,W 4
REPORTED BY
KAK
SUPERVISOR �.
j
DATE y
CHECKED BY
GB M
REVIEWED BY
KAK VA-L
ENTERED BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70.5 _
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-94-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75.5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103.71-9
CHLORDANE-ALPIIA
0.02
U
7243-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-95-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
2688048-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501.15-6
CHLOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
_ U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
I918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189745.6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674.11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92.6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16.5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21.9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29.3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
110%-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN It
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:>:?•; AS6>»'::<
:...........................................................................................................................:..::.
?#E7?RTC1? < >%:#z: >>:# >#>
>>#:><» :> :
1.........
> :;::::..:: •::::.:%'••
453Gfi4 U............................CiSN.
< »« >:>>E'•»##:.;::::.»#>###
..... ::.:.:.:.:..........................................................................:.........?
o >::`::::::.::::::.:::.?•»:>:: :::zt>:>:> ; :z;>'>::># ...... :i'>:'>:<z>:,.:.:::>
Q
3#>#:: »:::.;::•.:•,,::::.;> 's
:`:2::::>:::
:.........:..............................................n411.....................................Sf.................6.................::.:r:::.::::.::::::::::::•::::::::::
? fillet El f titv4 ;::-; .....
C .............................:0
::` ::::> :: ?
.L............:
: ;::;•::::%:3 :
a TL...............
% * .,. ... :: > '# #::
...... ?::::;:;:ri:>:::;:# ? 5'•.`•'?:: :::% ::
i!tR[il iE7btCfjltldD.: •::: •::....::::..; .;..::::::..::.:::•::LgfL::::::::::::::::::::::::
: 2 : :> '•#:
: : :::::; :;' :
••: •.ii($1
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
9.50
N
25057-99-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
.. 133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
.0.50
N
7600.50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94.75-7
2.4-13
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPIIENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1919-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T -
0.75
N
51-36-5
3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # 8W3774
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
:.;::.;::.;:->;•.;:•:.:::.;.iFt::;:;::;
:..::.:.........:......:.......:..........::.:..:::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::.::•:::
:...............G.:.::..............................................
............D
QI•.::::::::::::G.........................................................Pxs
G7EDS;::t:::::i:::}S:s:::'•:::`•::
•iLSM:::#:::?:::::2:::.tfE<:2;;:::•i:•r::;::::•::•::•::•::<.•::•::>::•::•::-::.::<.;r>:•::•:<.:•:..
nty....:..:..::.::....::::::::::.•::.:::::::::::::::.:.:..
:.:;:•::•:;::•>:•:
x4L ............
.. :.. .>:•::•::
it T. ......
..:.::� s: ••:: •:: •::::•:•::•:::::.:....
:::l`i4'RC.`E'R:�COSi1fiG1E1tJ1?:::::2:::s::::::::::::::#::::::i::%;
...................:..........
8li.:;:;:;:::::;Si:
i� C$T'.0 3'OUN3>:;::;:<:<:>:;;>:�»:•:::•::•::•::•:::•::•::•>:•;:;::
c•.>:•>:•::.::.>:.:;:;•>:::>:•:;•:::•::.:
..
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115.90-2
FENSULF071110N
10.0
U
50-29.3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
29"3-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923.22-4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56.38-2 -
NAILED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMEMOATE
3.5
U
298-00.0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02.2
METIIYLPARATIHON
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PIIORATE
1.5
u
2497-07.6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-61-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACIILOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
11348-4
MOK 264
5.7
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
2.1
3I440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99.7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
200841.5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71.2
PEBULATE
6.7
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950.58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
2921-89-2 -
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMERYN
2.2
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18.1
7'EBUT111URON
3.1
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAAI)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50.0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
51235-Ob2
11EXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
51218-45-2
METOLACHLOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED
PEAKS DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

Synopsis
On or about Aug 26, 1996, DWQ investigated fish kill in private
pond owned by Charles Clouse, downstream of Hyman Young Nursery.
Tests showed presence of Endosulfan in concentration exceeding
the water quality standard. NC Dept of Agriculture (as per NCGS)
assumed responsibility and assessed a fine against a licensed
applicator at the nursery. Fish reported dying again in April,
1998. A sampling of the pond showed Endosulfan in small
concentrations; less than water quality standard. Division of
Water Quality, Groundwater and Dept of Agriculture visited .
nursery. As result all pesticide spraying was stopped and under
drainage system in greenhouses were located and sealed.
Additional sampling in stream continued to show presence of
Endosulfan up to the 8/5/98 sampling. No presence detected in
later samples (10/2/98, 12/7/98). Nursery cooperative.
Endosulfan has aquatic WQ standard of 0.05 ug/l. There is no WQ
standard for human health (Endosulfan Sulfate). EPA std for
human health (consumption of fish) is 240 ug/l Endosulfan
Sulfate.
Chronology
Pond
Stream
8/26/96
Endosulfan
0.25
ug/l
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.24
ug/l
4/16/98
Endosulfan
0.007
ug/l
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.010
ug/l
6/2/98
Endosulfan
0.029
ug/l
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.040
ug/l
6/16/98
Endosulfan
0.014
ug/l
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.021
ug/l
8/5/98
Endosulfan
0.038
ug/l
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.083
ug/l
10/2/98
Endosulfan
nd**
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.048
ug/l
12/7/98
Endosulfan
nd**
nd**
Endosulfan
Sulfate
0.017
ug/l
0.018
ug/l
8/30/00
Endosulfan
nd**
nd**
Endosulfan
Sulfate
nd**
nd**
* Samples
of stream taken
adjacent
to intake
to Clouse Pond
** nd =
non detectable

Page 2
The following is the results of DWQ sampling to determine
effectiveness of efforts by Hyman Young Nursery to close of
underdrainage system at the greenhouse closest to the stream.
Sampling completed after spraying at Nursery request. Results
indicate that measures and procedures by the Nursery to close
underdrainage system were effective. Work on other greenhouses
was to follow the same procedures.
5/15/98 NH3-N 0.01
TKN 0.1
NO2-NO3 1.6
Total P <0.01
Upstream
mg/1 0.06 mg/1
mg/1 0.1 mg/1
mg/1 0.44 mg/1
mg/l <0.01 mg/1
Downstream
0.04 mg/1
0.1 mg/1
1.1 mg/1
0.04 mg/1
Sampling Activities by the
DWQ
� Groundwater
Section
Sediment
Sediment
From Pond
From Stream
2/15/2000 Endosulfan I
nd
0.0143 mg/kg
Endosulfan II
0.0022 mg/kg
0.0439 mg/kg
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.0071 mg/kg
0.0889 mg/kg
9/18/2000 DWQ assessed Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., for
liquid fertilizer spill occurring on 3/16/2000.
Assessment of $4427.46 was paid on 9/27/2000

LAB # BW4368
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTIIION
2.0
U
2921-89-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICIILORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-OD-0
ETHYLPARATIHON
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-MS
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
778G34-7.
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
::�%:%.`•�%::
...............................
.L1E'1tY:7E3):i::i::i::ii:;iti:i;::::::::
:::::::::.:::............,........:..:....................................:.....:...:.:...:...:::..:.:::......:.::::
:::%%:::isS:PFiS'tTGiDH:i::::i:i:>:i::::::;:;;; �:.:.::;:;;:;i•;:.:;;>:;>:� :::<::i::::::.>:.
•:.>::•::•;:•:::•;:•FS
T - .:•::>:
.................................
:%:'.:%%5':'::i:::
TAAC,LT:COM70UNI3.......................................0
...:....:...................L
iL
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
N
SM-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113484
MGK 264
5.7
N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
2.1
N
314-40-9
DROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
N
23184-66-9
DUTACIILOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
N
20D841-5
0UT1'LATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBUTATE
6.7
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5
N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
N
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
13940-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
N
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
N
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2
N
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TE13UTHIURON
3.1
N
759-944
EFTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
N
51235-04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
N
51218-45-2
METOLACIIIAR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
TOL
Target Ouantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
Change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T
1•:ntatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TOL
E
Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but
not detected
COMMENTS:

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
BW 368
SUPERVISOR
REPORTED BY
AP
DATE
"
CHECKED BY
G13
REVIEWED BY
KK
ENTERED BY
)))
e /
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:::::::..............................:::....::.:.:...::..................................................................................................................
t i1EGt
:>:E»::::<:::»":»:1+5#:>::>:::>::>E::>?::::Tel
SriCtfi>?:<:::>Ez::>::<::<<>:::<>:>::>3>::::>::::>::>:s::>.<E>:::::><;::;
:::::•:•.::::::•:::::::•:::::::::::::7�iltEi:QA.tlUi?1#......:..:....................q
► :...:::.:::.::y
1k•::::::::.::::::::•.::::•::•::•:::::::.::::::::.::.:.11tG�1CQh#CtltSld4�:•::•::::.:::::::.::.a
!1,:::•:::::•::::::::..::::.::.
1
15972-%8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20.8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421.93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912.24-9
ATRAZINE
0.15
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-846
BIIC-ALPIIA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86.8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
7243-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77.6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCIILORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CIILOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
189745-6
CHLOROTIIALONIL
0.03
U
117.18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32.1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213.65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
9001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
3
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:>::c{sa :>
z>>ltutuc E:>:>:::>:>::>>:<»>»><>:
>z>»'•<>:» '' > :>>:>p
::,;;crecf>:>
<:>:><:»<zz::»'`>:>: `as <:'•>::>?:::»':'•>:
;•:.;::a •::•;:•;:
..... EGEE71£% :##8::%: :>:>:::`•:::: :##< `::i::i::>:i:<
:?>
.......L7CCTE�....
.....:>..
:.:.. A1i{i . OhM1P.QUitA. :......
CAR(7 ({4kQ ...... ..:: ;:;: Y;:: #::::::::::::
:.. l ::::::::::::.:..........
.7
50594-66.6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
75057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90.4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100.02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918.00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5-T
0.75
N
51.36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
�
I

9:-. 1 .ti rI.. nrur v
DIVISION ENVIRONM NTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
,eA
COUNTY PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BAST ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA FLAKE
M ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT T ARO F MRO RRO Wa WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM
Other PLIANCE ❑CHAIN ❑ INFLUENT
Kom OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier, tall, Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
Lab Number'
Date Receive Time:
B Rec'd From: -Courler-Ha d Del
DATA E TR Y: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): / STATION LOCATION: T 7D C/�J (Jam ^ , ' C6
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
(/� ( j/
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # D YeqlnZ
mm/dd) Tim Begin Date End Time End Dep DM D D M Value Type Composite Sampl y
11/ �6`o AL A H L T S B G GNXX
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/i
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:Total1034 ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag- Ilver 1077 ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/l
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Lithium 1132
ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/l
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147
ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/l
Organochlorine Pesticides
Omanoahowhorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics I
I I Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd) I
I I Phytoplankton I
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 1&
82244 1431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpitlon On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

`
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
1V SAMPLETYPE
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT QA
l STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
l COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
El INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) HANER
3
Lab Number 8W4368
Date Received : 6/19/98
Time Received : 9:00 AM
Received By ]G
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: UT TO COWAN COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station I/ Date Begin (yvlmm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, It, L Composite-T, S, Sample Type
980616 1010 0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 322I7 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
l,1BAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexevalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L.
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

LAB # BW4367
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARBOPIIENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-98-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50-29.3
DEF
2.5
U
I50-50-5
FOIEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73.7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NAILED
4.0
U
60.51.5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETIIYLPARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-94-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
MIN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETIION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
15972-%8
ALACHLOR
834-12.8
AMETRYN
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
314-40-9
BROMACIL
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
2008-4I-5
BUTYLATE
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
1134-23.2
CYCLOATE
2172546-2
CYANAZINE
2921.88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
333-41-5
DIAZINON
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5121845-2
METOLACHLOR
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
3.4 N
2I081-64-9
1.1 N
113ABA
0.8 - N
2212-67-1
3.4 N
15299-99-7
4.8 N
27314-13-2
2.2 N
1114-71-2
6.5 N
1610-18-0
4.2 N
7287-19-6
2.4 N
23950-58-5
2.5 N
139AO-2
1.0 N
122-34-9
0.5 N
1014-70.6
2.8 N
34014-18.1
2.3 N
5902-51-2
1.2 N
88650-0
5.7 N
1929-77-7
4.2 N
METRIBUZIN
1.6
MGK 264
5.7
MOLINATE
2.1
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
NORFLURAZON
7.1
PEBULATE
6.7
PROMETON
2.5
PROMETRYN
2.4
PRONAMIDE
7.6
PROPAZINE
- 1.0
SIMAZINE
1.1
SIMETRYN
2.2
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
TERBACIL
4.4
TERBUTRYN
1.4
VERNOLATE
0.6
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

ENRIDWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTED BY AP
CHECKED BY GB
REVIEWED BY KK kill -
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. 8W4367
SUPERVISOR
DATE
ENTERED BY J Qy/
DATE ^� I (�/L
15972-60.8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-B&B
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
IEPTAC14LOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLORODENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72A3-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103.74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734A8-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675.77.6
CHLORNED
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
Cl I LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
IMA5-6
CHLOROTFIALONIL
0.03
U
117-I8-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-I I-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT. PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:�::�
i�'sss:s:: �;:.•::::..:...:::::::::::.............:q:::::.�::::::::::::::.:::.:................?:QL.....:..:D1;3L'G7'CIJ............................G'tSS>K.................tiERBECFLtFE....:::.:::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
..........................................................................:...:.::::::::::::.::::.:::::::.::::::::::::::•::::::::.:...:...........................................................................................
�:>:>:::7 (F.t(f+ICD'' E::<:::>:'�:z>:>::>:::> #> �::>�:>::::>3:>E;''»'##::»:'::';:•:
�;;;;::;>`<�'::<:«:::»<z::><:::>::>'•>'•>'>'>
"'::><:<:z:>::>:'•>•>:;.;:•;:•:
. ........................
�;;:•;::•>E�::>:<:::»::::::>::>::::>#>#:%)`E:::;<::<:>:::::>:'><:>::::>::»r"";>:'•>::>::t##::::;;:-;:.;>:;.:
.......................�:.:::.3
L...............
•:::':;::>:
....... .............................. ....
:;::..tl .I..............A
8.. ...........�..........
[................
....:.,..: •: •.:::::::::;:.;•.;:P�tRtE�l.'.1,,`f1Mh4�tD?�?.•::::�;::��:<:�:::t-;:i�>:�>::.>:;::::::�:;:�:i;:;V�11.:
�•::•::•:;>:�:::•>:�::�>i:.;:::•:•:•::•>:
•: -:•::
--::::::::: ,.:....::??F�l:
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICEILORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-95-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-904
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50.2
5-IIYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94.75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
I918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

DIVISIO F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY
RIVER BAST
REPORT T AR F O MRO R WeRO WIRO WSRO TS
❑AMBIENT ❑ QA
AT BM
Other PLIANCE ❑ CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Cou , St ff, Ot er ❑EMERGENCY
COLLECTOR(S): ����
STATION LOCATION:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # - % JData 5-egin (ttv/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/1
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
SAMPLE TYPE Z
?STREAM El EFFLUENT
((❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
❑ ESTUARY
Lab Number: /A
Date Receive % Time:
Rec'd b - From: sourler-Ha d Del
DATA ENTUZY Y• CH.
DATE REPORTED:
Time EndlDepth/M WDBM I
Value Type
y(,l( A H L
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/I
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
CrChromlum.Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag ilver 1077 ug/1
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Composite I Sample ype
T S B C G
LI-Lithlum 1132
ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenlc:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophospiwrus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpitlon (in/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Lnboralnry Report / Water Quality
W❑ SAMPLETYPE
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT QA
XD STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
XD COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
El INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
2
Lab Number $W4367
Date Received : 6/19/98
Time Received: 9:00 AM
Received By : 1G
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station N Dale Begin (yy/mm/dd) Dale End (yylmm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DB, DBf1i Value Type- A, H, L Composite-T, 5, Sample Type
980616 1015 0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /IOOml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /I oom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin R Lignin ug/l.
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

LAB N BW4366
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
:;<•;;:;:-;;:<.;:
:::::::::::...................................:::..::::::::.::::::.:.::::•:.
:.:........::::::..........................kAStytu......................................................
:.......................................................................................................................1
::..........
..................................
#s�tf7b.....
........:: i...........Affl
f;Ct7k3Rl3UNl :: S:z':: >E::::'• ; ::
:: >::fi: .:
1......................................................fAki>
:•;:•;:;:•;;:•:;:-;:;:;;;:-;:;:•;;:•;:•;:-;::-:;:-
C.fi4?�pQUNA......................................
;:;;::•;;;::•;:•::•::•:;::;;;o:•;
.i............................o
r :.
.t
78619-6
CARBOPHENWHON
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTIIION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVIN1,1105
1.9
U
333-41.5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-39-2
NAILED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
2984W-0
EINYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PRORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETIIION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-%8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
MI TRIBUZIN
1.6 N
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113-48-4
MOK 264
5.7 N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
'- N
2212-67-1
MOI.DiATE
2.1 N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6 N
23194-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
273W13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1 N
2008-41.5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULAT'E
6.7 N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
2.5 N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-I9-6
PROMETRYN
2.4 N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6 N
21725-06-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0 N
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1 N
333-41.5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2 N
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1 N
759-94-4
C•PTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4 N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4 N
51235-04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6 N
5121845-2
METOLACIILOR
4.2
N
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not
detected
<. COMMENTS:

ENRIDWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
` REPORTED BY AP Yy
CHECKED BY GB
REVIEWED BY KK �(
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. BW4366
SUPERVISO
DATE
ENTERED BY I�
DATE
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-B
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BHC-GAMMA(LJNDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57.74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METNOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
Cl I LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921.88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTIIALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-92-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DUE. PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT. PP
0.06
U
1I097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60.57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCIILOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.03
0.007
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
0.007
BWI-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.021
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
),
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
;.........::
:#?:C:;:::t, .::::'.,''•`;��tE1FB>:<-;:;.;
::::::.:::.: l�iA..........
:::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.....
IC33)B•`:E:5%#::`•`•`•s::`•:......
:a �L•.' ::::2
....
:p:;:: C7'EIJ:
Ei
.. .... ... #:: ;jr' g ::`• ::?
A
:'• :?%: ':::•:::;;•:<.:::•;:•:2':: i%' ` ::::: 3 S :?,''• : ` s :5 s ::::'•
E3EABEGEDE........
:Y? :::;;-::., ::::::
I L...:........:.UE
Q.....................................
;:•:::•:,•::<:;"»':::XX
;::
.............a
tL........................................................?v.cv.strunta..
M1
E
50594-%6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120.36.5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057.89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90.4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600.50.2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPIIENot.
4,00
N
94-82.6
2.4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPIll-Nofl.(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2.4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3,5 DICIILOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4.5-TP (SII.VI:XI
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

V. 1.1, IT.. nNr V
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY
RIVER BASI %�'c�
REPORT T ARO FR MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ QA
AT BM
Other COMPLIANCE ❑ CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Cou i ( Staff, Other ❑EMERGENCY
COLLECTOR(S): G
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOC T10N: 'C
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS: 1
Station # t Dat%_Vegln (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begin I Date End
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
SAMPLE TYPE
;FgLTREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
❑ ESTUARY
Lab Number:
Date Recelve
i.<;
Rec'd
From: us Courier Han Del
DATA E TR BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Time EndIDepfh DM rjB DBM Value Type Composite I Sample ype
L 1 A H L T S B C G )NXX
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
Cr•Chromium:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ' ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
Li -Lithium 1132 `i
ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/I
Na-Sodium 929
rng/I
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytopiankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. m9/1
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1•
400 1•
82244 1 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipitlon Qn/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
136
1351
1350
35
64
4

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number
8 W4366
W❑ SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received :
6/19198
COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
Time Received:
9:00 AM
RIVER BASIN :
AMBIENT QA
XD STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
Received By
JG
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Data Released :
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
I
Date Reported :
7/23/98
Estimated BOD Range:
Station Location: COWAU COVE CRK
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station H
Date Begin (yy/mm1dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
1
Time End
Depth - DM, DB, DBn1
Value Type- A, H, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980616
1000
0.1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom]
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom]
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /looml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pli 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Colifami Total Tube "/100 m]s
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Tolal 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
rJ
it _ t.:_
,i
�'' JUL 2 7 hT

DIVISION?OF� ATER (QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
1V SAMPLE TYPE
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN:
AMBIENT 0 QA
X❑ STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
COLLECfOR(S) : HANER
3
Lab Number 8W3776
Date Received : 6/4/98
Time Received: 8:55 AM
Received By : HMW
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station N Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Dale End (yylmm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type- A, H, L Composite-T, S, Sample Typc
980602 .1
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /IOOml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 ma/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L...
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin &: Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium ug/L
Il
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/I.
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L

DIVISION O ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
PJVF-R BASIN C
REPORT TO: `RO MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS KEIA IENT Qp EAM
AT BM
Other PLIANCE ❑ CHAIN LAKE
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Co r r,}S�t if, Other EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S): Co
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # Date Begin (yy/ m/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Dept 1
1
BUD5 310 mg/l
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/l
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/l
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/l
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 680 mg/l
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/l
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluorite 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/l
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
(�f)
❑
EFFLUENT
❑
INFLUENT
For Lab [lae t1N[.Y
Lab Number:
Date Received: Timer
Rec'd by:
From: Bus- ourie -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
DBM Value Type I Composite
I A H L T S B
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/l
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
CrChromiurmTota11034 u9A
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/l
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag Silver 1077 ug/1
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/I
.0 ZS4�
w S0S3
G
Li-Lithlum 1132 \
ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/l
Na-Sodium 929
mg/l
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Omanonhosniwrus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
IPhytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
SW3776
SUPERVISOR
REPORTED BY
KAK1L
DATE
CHECKED BY
AD
10
REVIEWED BY
KAK
ENTERED BY
A
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
......................
..................
.
......
..............
...... ......
x.:
X. X
....
........ .
......
.......
..........
.........
. .......
.........
. ..........
XX .. ...............................
...... ............
15972-%8
ALACHLOR
0.10
u
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
u
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
u
7421-93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
u
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
u
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
u
319-94-45
BIIC-ALPIIA
0.02
u
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
u
319-85-7
BTIC-BETA
0.03
u
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
u
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
u
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
u
58-89-9
BI[C-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
u
118;74-1
IIEXACIILOROBENZENE
0.01
u
57-74-9
CIILORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
u
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
u
510341-9
CHLORDANE-ALPIIA
0.02
u
7243-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
u
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
u
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
u
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
u
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACIILOR
0.02
u
2675-77-6
CIJLORNEB
0.03
u
26880-48-8
OXYCIILORDANE
0.02
u
501-15-6
CII LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
u
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETIMIN
1.00
u
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
u
1918-16-7
PROPACIILOR
0.10
u
1897-45-6
CIILOROITIALONIL
0.03
u
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
u
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
u
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
u
53-19-0
DDD,OP
0.06
u
12674-11-2
AROCIILOR 1016
0.50
u
72-54-8
DDD.PP
0.04
u
11104-28-2
AROCIILOR 1221
0.50
u
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
u
11141-16-5
AROCIILOR 1232
0.50
u
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
u
53469-21-9
AROCIILOR 1242
0.50
u
789-02-6
DDT, Oil
0.04
u
12672-29-6
AROCIILOR 1248
0.50
u
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
u
11097-69-1
AROCIILOR 1254
0.50
u
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
u
11096-82-5
AROCIILOR 1260
0.50
u
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
0.012
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
u
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
0.017
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
u
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
0.040
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
5
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
.. .............
.. ....
. . ...
............
..............
........... . ........
................................
. .................
.. .. ............ ............................
X":
xx:
....
.......
. ....
X
..................GEi.................
X
...........
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-99-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-11YDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2.4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-92-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACIILOROPIIENOL (PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAD61BA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2.4.5-TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # BW3776
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTIIION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-98-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTIIION
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMETON
2.5
U
6923-22A
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333A 1-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
3OD-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICIILORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMEINOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
EMYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
MEMYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-94-3
PIIORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689.24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13011-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETIIION
1.3
u
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
834-12-8
AMEFRYN
1.1
N
113-48-4
MGK 264
5.7
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67.1
MOLINATE
2.1
314-40-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
23184-66-9
BUTACIILOR
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
5234-69-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-18-0
PROMErON
2.5
101-21-3
CIILORPROMIAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMEIRYN
2.4
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014406
SIMEPRYN
2.2
957-51-7
DIPIIENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUTIHURON
3.1
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
22224-92.6
FENAMIP110S
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
51235.GI-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
5121845-2
MEfOLAC1ILOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

.&.A
COUNTY BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
Other :
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Lnborntory Report / Water Quality
PRIORITY
AMBIENT QA
XD COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
W SAMPIXTYPE
ZI STREAM EFFLUENT
LAKE INFLUENT
ESTUARY
2
Lab Number : 8W3775
Date Received: 614199
Time Received : 8:55 AM
Received By HMW
Data Released : AR
Date Reported : 7115/98
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station 9 Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DI1f, DB, DB11I Value Type- A,1I, L Composite-T, S, Sample Type
980602 0.I
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom[
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /I oom[
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom[
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom[
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
PH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/Io0 mis
COMMENTS:
JUL
17
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chl a: Tri 32217 ug/L
Chl a: Corr 32209 ug/L
Pheophylin a 32213 ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH) 83 pH= C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em2
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945
Sulfide 745
Boron
Tannin & Lianin
quw
Hexavalenl Chromium
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe --Iron 1045 ug/L

For Lab Ilse ONLY
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY (.L
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
U-1
RPJER BAST
❑ AMBIENT
❑
❑EFFLUENT
REPORT T : ARO F O MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM
[�iCOMPLIANCE
QA
❑
REAM
❑
Other
T �"
CHAIN
LAKE
INFLUENT
❑
OF CUSTODY
❑
Shipped by: Bus Courle Sta(f, Other
EMERGENCY
ESTUARY
Lab Number (�
Date Receiv d: O
TIme:O
Rec'd b From: Bus- ourier Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S):
STATION LOCATION:
IV
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station #
Date B9 In (yy/ m/dd)
Time Begin
Date End
Time End
Dept VB
D M
Value Type
Composite
Lmp Type
V/-
O
A H I.
T S B
G GNXX
1
BOD5 310 mg/1
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
is
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 m!3A
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
Cd•Cadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:Total1034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag Silver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/1
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/1
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Sclenlum 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
toOrganochlorine
Pesticides
Organophospirorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
II Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd) I
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point R
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 1.
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpitlon (in/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
Mean Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DMl/Revlsed 10/96

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO.
8W3775
SUPERVISOR--/-?
REPORTED BY
KAKfA4-
DATE
7
CHECKED BY
AD A)) -
REVIEWED BY
KAK 6ZA-L
ENTERED BY
ANALYSIS
RESULTS
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES
BY ELECTRON
CAPTURE DETECTION
. .............
15912-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-204
ENDRIN
0,03
U
309-00-2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPIIA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ErIIAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
IIEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-86-8
BJIC-DELTA
0.03
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
IIEXACIILOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METROXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
3734-48-3
C14LORDENE
0.02
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CJILORNEB
0.03
U
26880-48-8
OXYCIILORDANE
0.02
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZILATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMEHIRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-1
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD,OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3,424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469-21-9
AROOILOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN 1
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
9001-35-2
TOXAPIIENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
6
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:x.l.. X
: .... ** ..........
......
..............................
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-904
CIILORAMBEN
0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-11YDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2.4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86-5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
3,5 DICIII-OROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP (STLVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # 8W3775
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWO. LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOT1110N
10.0
U
50-29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX
2.0
U
298-03.3
DEMEf'ON f
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINP110S
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
1 0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICIILORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
4.0
U
60-51.5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
EINYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METHYLPARATIMN
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07.6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2101-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
FMION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
xxx................................................................................:.::::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::..:.................................................................::::::::.::::::;:.:::::...;:..::..:.:::::::::::::
:.................................
...............................
z:11RG-`fGf)11Ppi?NI>Eiss#'>:E:`•;i<i#?:.':'•1#::'?Xx
L.................0
...........................................................
.1, x.GOM..aE�Nt:::::::::::•:::::::::::::::..:.........
::: e
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6
N
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.1
N
113-48-4
MGK 264
5.7
N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
2.1
N
31440-9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6
N
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-I3-2
NORFLURAZON
7.1
N
2008-41.5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
I114-71-2
PEBULATE
6.7
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-I8-0
PROMETON
2.5
N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4
N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6
N
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
13940-2
PROPAZINE
1.0
N
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34.9
SIMAZINE
1.1
N
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2
N
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
2.8
N
34014-I8-1
TEBUTHIURON
3.1
N
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
59.02-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4
N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4
N
51235-04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6
N
51218-45-2
METOLACIILOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED
PEAKS DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed NE- No established TOL
E- Estimated Value U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

r
..,
DIVISION Or WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
Lab Number
8W3774
COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
PRIORITY
ElSAMPLE TYPE
Date Received :
614/98
RIVER BASIN:
El AMBIENT QA
XD STREAM
EFFLUENT
Time Received:
Received By
8:55 AM
HMW
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
X❑ COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
El LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY
❑ ESTUARY
Data Released-:
AR
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
I
Date Reported :
6125/98
Estimated DOD Range:
Station Location. Ur TO COWAN COVE CRK
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Remarks:
A
Station 9
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
Dale End (yy/root/dd)
Time Begin
Time End
I Depth - DM, DB, DBM
Vnlue Type- A,11, L
Composite-T, S,
Sample Type
980602
O.I
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN an N 625 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper1042 ug/L
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium ug/L
Ag- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fc- Iron 1045 ug/l,
COMMENTS

DItIfCI V R EFor Lab Use ONLY
ON OF EN 1 O�NMNTAL MANAGEMENT . WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY aje.4 PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE I
RIVER BAST
❑AMBIENT
❑ QA
I� STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT T : ARO 9R0 MRO RRO WaRO WIRO WSRO TS
AT Other
Ot
Shipped by:
C�
14COMPLIANCE
❑EMERGENCY
❑ CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
❑ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
Bus Coubr Staff, Other
l
Lab Number: ��JJ
Date Recel a `� Time:
Rec'd b From: Bus ourl -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
G DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): CA ( / / �h f' / 4) % (26 i %
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: (//(l f v �Jl/ �V _CJ (/ �L
Seed: Yee ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station aLe Begin (yy mm/dd Time Begin Date End "ept(DM D DBM I Value Type Composite Sample
A H L T S B C G NXX
2
COD High 340 mg/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/I
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Trl 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 mg/1
Sulfide 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mgA
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/1
CdCadmium 1027 ug/I
Cr-Chromium:Total1034 ug/1
CuCopper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-Zlnc 1092 ugA
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ug/(
Li -Lithium 1132
ugA
Mg -Magnesium 927
mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/1
Na-Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002
ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147
ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900
ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Otganophosphorus Pesticides
I I Acid Herbicides I
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mg/1
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 .
400 If
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
+m
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
I
•Y
r)MI/Revised In/8fi

REPORTED BY
KAK
CHECKED BY
GB
REVIEWED BY
KAK K
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. SW3774
SUPERVISOR`
DATE
ENTERED BY
DATE
DATE �
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
0.10
U
72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.08
U
7421-934
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.05
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.75
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
3I9-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.02
U
2593-15-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.03
U
76-44-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.02
U
319-96-8
BHC-DELTA
0.03
U
I024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BHC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.08
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.02
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103.74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.03
U
2385-85-5
MIREX
0.03
U
373448-3
CHLORDENE
0.02
U
39765-M5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.02
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.03
U
•26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.02
U
50I-15-6
CH LOROBENZI LATE
5.00
U
52645-53-1
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1.00
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.08
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.10
U
1997-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.03
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.02
U
1861-32-I
DCPA
0.02
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.06
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.04
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.05
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.02
U
53469.21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.04
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.06
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.02
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.03
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN 11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.02
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
2
ACID HERBICIDES
BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
::>:<:#* E»::..:....
:................................::......
C:....:................................Q..........................:::.......................fi!�5
..........................:.:..................................::..............,..................................................................................................?4....................................
Nk?BiCtp :.....
..:..... 1...............#?ilp....:
::;:::;::>:.::;:i:..TARGET..01v......
ND:'? ::r: ii::;';i::::;:::.....
:.`d'ff2:o>::i:%`u'
...........8..................
jU::%::::?:.:.:.:.?:``::::%:r:3`:'t:t::.:;:::t::tr:::;:isi::::::r##::#::i�':•`:::'::::::t::::::::''-''''':3:#:t
i..........................................................................................................:...:::.:.:.:•::::..:...
CARGE3 CU6iPf3Uhttl......................
L 1L........................
6.....:....:.................:::+!S1L
::::::::::::::':�%.
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
N
120-36-5
DICHLORPROP
8.50
N
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
5.00
N
88-85-7
DINOSEB
0.40
N
133-90-4
CHLORAMBEN
.0.50
N
7600-50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
2.00
N
94-75-7
2,4-D
1.60
N
100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
94-82-6
2,4-DB
5.00
N
87-86.5
PENTACHLOROPHENOL(PCP)
0.30
N
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.36
N
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
1.00
N
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.35
N
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
N
93-72-1
2,4,5.TP (SILVEX)
1.50
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

LAB # BW3774
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
:::�i �::: �:�:::�:;...1":...............................::::::::::::::.�:::::::::::..:.........:.:.:.::.:.::..�,�:::::::..........................................:........
EfEG7El):::......
i:`•5:: :i::;;:;: ASk::%: :::'s:::PFSTa
75E•::•::•;;;;:•::•:::;;:•::•:<•:>:•:;:-;;>;:•:::•:>::;:•>:•>:•:;•;;:;::...:.;:-;:-;:;:;>:;:.
..................................................7
.............Dfi7TEC7fill:::�i:�i
.
W:�:�:�i:�i:�:�:?8?:�:�'s:'::�:?i�RQ:C:041MY4313ND#�'r:�:;:::�:is�::�::�;ii::i:z:i`i:z::5::•:::�;:�:
1L:>�;:�;;s:::�>::•::.::•::•::;•>:•;:•;:�
fL
786-19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.1
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
50.29-3
DEF
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOIEX
2.0
U
298-03-3
DEMEPON
2.5
U
6923-224
MEVINPHOS
1.9
U
333-41-5
DIAZINON
0.8
U
300-76.5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
2.1
U
56-38-2 -
NALED
4.0
U
60-51-5
DIMET110ATE
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
298-044
DISULFOTON
1.0
U
298-02-2
METIIYLPARATHION
1.5
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
2.3
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
1.5
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.8
U
2104-64-5
EPN
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
563-12-2
ETHION
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
1.1
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
.:; hT§a `:> ;:.'[3C� 1' '#�'>.2E' %3 '% ... ` . s2 �?%?'•'t <'•`'': # £:?`: ;:•;::':.:<:;;: $ s� `•?E:':<;;;;•',} '.'•E %:::':':-;;::;:;.,>;:;.;y%s >r's'• t: t: s 3E%r:;::;;_,,'• `% ::;:::>::::'':"r? ::
. ....::::::::::::::: ........::.:::.kQl.:::::. R # CiFi?.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.. SR................ FSFY l7E:.........................................: #!(iFf•T:ID-:::::
...................:.:..................:..::..:.:.................................:::...................:::...:.:::.::::::::::::::::::::.:::...:::...................�..................................
XX
:-;:;;>::-:-;:;;>::;->:;:-;;:;:;:?:ri::i:................................................... Ak T!COMi?.......................::..::.....:... 1 ............ +�f�Gf�i CisOk..t�....................................:... ? ................. d . E.........................................................7... t...........QUNi�.......................................
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
1.6 N
834-12-8
AMEfRYN
1.1
N
I13ABA
MGK 264
5.7 N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
2.1 N
314-00.9
BROMACIL
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2.6 N
23194-66-9
BUTACHLOR
4.8
N
27314-13.2
NORFLURAZON
7.1 N
2008A 1-5
BUTYLATE
2.2
N
IIW71-2
PEBULATE
6.7 N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
6.5
N
1610-I8-0
PROMETON
2.5 N
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.4 N
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
2.4
N
23950-59-5
PRONAMIDE
7.6 N
21725A6-2
CYANAZINE
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
1.0 N
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.1 N
333A 1-5
DIAZINON
0.5
N
1014-70-6
SIMETRYN
2.2 N
957-51-7
DIPIIENAMID
2.8
N
34014-18-1
TEBUT111URON
3.1 N
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
4.4 N
22224-92-6
FENAMII'110S
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
1.4 N
51235-04-2
IIEXAZINONE
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.6 N
51218-45-2
METOLACIILOR
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but
not detected
COMMENTS:

r —
County of Buncombe
GENERAT. SERVICES
Divis nes:
30 VALLEX Si'REE'1'
Crntral Records:
828-250-5445
ASIiF.VILLI�:, NC; 28801
Gatakr:
828-251 499{)
Landfill:
828-645-53 f I
Permits K fnspcctinns:
828-250-5360
Bob Hurter, Director
surety ofhccr
87.8.250-5480
FAX: [phone]
Solid waste:
K7,8.250-5460
Tansfer Station:
M28-251-4997
TF.LE-CAX 'TRANSMITTAL :iHEET
--;;
4
FAX }4 CALLED:
PLEASE DELIVER TO:
COMPANY NAME: LV_ `� 'JPV IiQtla..1'i, (.y f-
FROM:
FAX #: -- [phone]
SUBJECT: � �w.,•�,r�^
NUMBER OF PAGES:
(Including Cover Pg)
PROJECT- #
COMMENTS: <_ -- _ _ 1 _{- I i_ _ . C - �. ► f v t. .
r E, 0 F
7c- kfj
F
101d
•-
i
tf� !►1kc

ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
1550 37TH STREET, NE North Carolina Certification M0
CLEVELAND, TENNESSI E 37312 remiesser Cerriftcationg 02035
(423) 476 - 7766 Fax: [phone]
Lab Report 107242
3906
Buncombe County Hazardous Waste Office
Attention: Ms. Denese Ballow
30 Valley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
H.Y. Greenhouses Smith Mill Creek Sample Informatign
Kars & Kolors Sample #1 Water
Date Received 5/26/2000
Date Sampled 05/25/2000
Date Requested 6/ 9/2000
Rush Status Normal
Phone [phone]
❑ F(zx (828) 2324407
PO#
'Lao tcepon lUY;&41
Result -
AML
Method
Date
Time Analyst
Sergi- V tiles 8270
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17;26
MAW
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
410
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
17.26
MAW
1.3-Dichkxobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17;26
MAW.
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
17:26
MAW
2A,6-Trichkxophenot
<50
ug / L
50
8270
5/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2,4.6-Trk:h1orophow
10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2,4-Diohkxrophenol
< 10
Ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:25
MAW
2,4-Dimethytphenol
s 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2,4-Dlnitrophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
5270
6/ 6/00
17:W
MAW
2,4-Dinftrotoluene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
17:26
MAW
2-Chbronaphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
2-Chlorophenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
2-Methyt-4,6-d1nitrophenc1
< 60
ug I L
so
8270
6/ 6/OD
17;26
MAW
2-Methylndphthalene
{ 10
ug I L
10
8270
5/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2-Methylphenol
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
2-Wroanilhe
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
616100
17;26
MAW
2-NRrophenol
< 50
ug I L
50
8270
B) 6//00
17:26
MAW
3,T-Dichkwobenzidine
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
3-methyl, 4-ChWophenol
< 10
ug / L
10
5270
6/ 6100
17:20
MAW
3-NitroaruTine
< 50
ug / L
50
6270
6/ 6/DO
17:26
MAW
4-Bromopherlyl phenyl ether
.910
ug I L
10
5270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
4-Chloroannkm
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
4-Chbrophenyl phenyl ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
4-MsthYlpheW
x 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
4-NhmniGne
<50
ug / L
50
8270
616100
17:26
MAW
4-Nitrophenol
<50
Ug / L
50
8270
616/00
17:26'
MAW
Awnephthene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
1726
MAW
Acenaphthylem
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Anttuacene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17.26
MAW
BenwManthmoene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
615100
17:26
MAW
eenzo(a)pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
17:26
MAW
Benzo(b)fluroanthene
t 10
ug / L
10
5270
6/ 6/0O
17:26
MAW
Benzo(g,h,l)peryiene
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Benzo(k)nuoranthene
a 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Benzoic acid
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Benzyl alcohol
< 10
ug / L
10
$270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Friday, June 23, 2000
Page 1 of 3
ZO-d `d95=80 TO-80—"CEW

FrAqb 1?_e
ort
107242
Result-
MDL
Method
Orite
Time
A
Analyst
�,;fHILValatiles 8270
8is(2-hioroethax0methane
s 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Bis(2-chlordethyl)ether
< 10
ug 1 L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Bis(2-chloroisopropylWer
-C10
ug / L
10
8270
Gt 6100
17:26
MAW
Bls(2-eth0he4)phthalate
-C10
ug / 1
10
6270
515100
17:24
MAW
Butyl benz)l phthalate
< 10
ug I L
10
B270
6/ 6/00
17.26
MAW
Chrysene
< 10
ug / L
10
B270
616100
17:20
MAW
di-n-butyl phthalate
10
ug 1 L
10
6270
6/ B/00
17:26
MAW
di-n-Oetylphthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
17:26
MAW
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Dibenzofuran
-10
ug / L
10
6270
6/ BI00
17:26
MAW
Diethyl phthalate
< 10
Ug / L
10
6270
61$100
17:26
MAW
Dlmethylphthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ B/00
17:26
MAW
Fluoranthene
< 10
ug l L
10
6270
61 B/00
17:26
MAW
Fluorene
< 10
ug / L
10
$270
6/ 6100
17:2B
MAW
HexachlorobenUne
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
17:26
MAW
Homehimbutedlene
e }0
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Hexachloroeyclopentadiene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
17:26
MAW
Hexachloroethane
CIO
ug / L
10
8270
615/00
17:26
MAW
Indeno(1,2,3-c l)pyrene
e to
ug l L
10.
8270
6/ 6MO
17:26
MAW
Isophorone
110
ug / L
10
0270
516/00
17:215
MAW
H-NIU060-d-n-propylan-dne
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
17:2B
MAW
N-NitrosWimethylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6l 6/00
17:26
MAW
N-Nitrosadiphenyiamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
615100
17:26
MAW
Naphtimlene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
516100
17:26
MAW
Nitrobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
$270
616100
17:26
MAW
Pentachkxophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
6270
616/00
17:26
MAW
Phenanthrene
.410
ug I L
10
6270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Phenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
17:26
MAW
Pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
17:25
MAW
' VOA Vial broke.
Dithiocaftmate Pesticides (as Nabam)
WA
NA
Pesticides
4,4'-DDD
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
$000
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
4,4-DOE
c 0.1
ug I L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
4,4-dDT
<0.1
Ug I L
0.1
8080
617/00
20:22
SDJ
Aklrin
<0,06
ug / L
0.05
8080
6J 7100
20:22
SDJ
alpha-BHC
<0.1
ug I L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
2022
SDJ
alpha -Chlordane
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/7/00
20:22
SDJ
alpha-Endosulfan
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8060
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
Aroclor 1016
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7100
20:22
SDJ
Aroclor 1221
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617/00
20:22
$aJ
Aroclor 1232
< 1
ug I L
1
8060
617100
20:22
SDJ
Aroolor 1242
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617/00
20:22
SDJ
Aroclor 1248
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617/00
20:22
SDJ
Aroclar 1254
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617100
20:22
SDJ
Aroclor 12W
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
517/00
20:22
SDJ
beta-BHC
<O.OS
ug / L
0.05
"0
6l 7/00
20:22
SDJ
beta-Endosulfan
<O,1
ug I L
0.1
8080
617/00
20;22
SDJ
delta-BHC
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
20;22
SDJ
Dieldrin
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
Endosulfan sulfate
< 0.4
ug / L
0.4
8080
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
Endrin
e 0.1
ug / L
011
8080
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
Endrin aldehyde
<0.2
Ug I L
0.2
8080
617100
20:22
SDJ
gamma -Chlordane
.41
ug / L
1
8080
617100
20:22
SDJ
Heptachlor
< 0.05
ug / L
O.OS
8080
6/ 7/00
20:22
SDJ
Heptachlor Epoxide
< 0,05
ug / L
0.05
$080
617100
20:22
SDJ
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
<0.05
ug / L-.,--
0.05
8080
617100
20:22
SDJ
Methoxychlor
c 1
ug / L
1
8060
617/00
20:22
$DJ
Friday, June 23, 2000 Page 2 of 3
E0 - d V99:20 ZO-SO-/SEW

Lab R . sort 107242 Result. MDL Method Date. Time Arra1 st
tildes y
Toxaphem 3 ug / L 3 8060 6/ 7= 20:22 SDJ
I hereby certify that the analytical procedures employed are those approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or Other applicablp methods for these analyses.
Erid'Qy, June 23, 2000
Page 3 of 3
VO,d `d9s=80 ZO-80-/SEW

ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
1550 37TH S717REET, NE North Carolina CeHfftratlrnirl J40
CITWELAND, TENNESSEE 37312 �F11ea"ceedybu,llunit02uJ4
(423) 476 - 7766 Fa)a [phone]
Lab Report 107243
3906
Buncombe County Hazardous Waste Office
Attention: Ms. Dense Ballew
30 Valley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
H.Y. Greenhouses Smith Mill Creek Sample Information
Kars & Kolors Sample 02 Water
Tab l?a."^wt hnnnor0
Date.' Received 5/26/2000
Date Surnpied 05/25/2000
Date !Requester 6/ 9/2000
Rush Status Normal
Phalle [phone]
! ]Fax [phone]
Po#
19
ILesurr
MLL
Method
Date
Thite Analyst
Semi-Votatiles 8270
1,2,4-Trichh-Onllzene
a 10
ug / L
10
5270
616/00
18:19
MAW
1,2-1)khlort tg ene
<10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6ro0
18:19
MAW
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
61600
18:19
MAW
1,4-010hlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
2,4,6-Trichlorophanol
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
2,4,(i-Trichlorophenoi
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
15:19
MAW
2A.Dichlorophencl
e 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
2,4Dimethylphenol
-C10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ CVOO
18:19
MAW
2,4-Dinitrophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
2,4-Dinitrototuene
< 10
ug I L
10
6270
616100
1619
MAW
2,6-01nitrotoluene
.010
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
1819
MAW
2-Chloronaphthalem
{10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
24hlomphenol
< 10
tug / L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
2-Methyl-4,6-dlnitMphena
<50
ug / L
50
4270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
2-Methylnaphlhalene
410
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
1$:19
MAW
2-MothylptlenG
.410
ug / L
10
6270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
2-Nitroanlllne
<50
ug / L
50
a270
616/00
18:19
MAW
2-Nitrophenol
<50
ug / L
50
6270
5/ 6I00
18:19
MAW
3,Y-131chlorobenzidine
.e 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
3-nv", 4-chloropheml
< 10
ug 1 L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
3-Nltroanlline
-C 50
ug / L
50
8270
61 &00
18:19
MAW
4-Broag3tle" phenyl ether
K 10
ug / L
10
6270
616/00
18:19
MAW
4-Chlormnitlne
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
15:19
MAW
4-Chlorophetlyt phenyl ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
4Methylphenoi
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
4-Nitroanilirm
{ 5o
ug / L
50
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
4-NWWhenol
<50
ug I L
50
8270
616=
18:19
MAW
Acenaphthene
.410
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
Acenaphthylene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6ro0
18:19
MAW
Anthracene
< 10
ug 1 L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
Senzo(a)anthracene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/0D
18:10
MAW
Benze(a)py►ene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
BenzoNfluroanthane
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ &00
18:19
MAW
Benze(g,h,7perylene
-10
ug I L
10
e270
S/ 6100
16:19
MAW
Benz*)fluoranthene
< 10
uy / L
10
8270
616100
16:19
MAW
Benzoic add
c 50
ug / L
50
8270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
Benzyl alcohol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
10:19
MAW
! rii4(X June 23, Z000
Page I of 3
50 - d ` /-9 :20 10-20-1cieW

Lab Re porl 107243
Result
AIDL
Method
Date
rime Analyst
Semi-V ladles 270
8I5(2-chbroethoxy)methane
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/D0
18:19
MAW
811-(2�hbroethyl)ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl ether
< 10
ug 1 L
10
6270
5/ 6100
15:19
MAW
8iS(2-&thylhexyl)phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
8/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
Butyl bow" phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
Chrysene
< 10
ug / L
10
5270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
di-n-Butyl phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
18:19
MAW
di-n-Octylphthaiate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
1$:19
MAW
Dibenzo(s,h)anthracene
< 10 .
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
Oibenzofuran
< 10
ug / L
10
0270
61 S/00
18:19
MAW
Olelhyl phthalate
< 10
U9 I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
i BA D
MAW
Dimethylphthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
1�1 6100
18:19
MAW
Fluomnthene
< 10
ug / L
10
13270
616100
18:19
MAW
Fluorem
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
1819
MAW
Hexachlorobenzens
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
Hexachlorabuladlene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616M
18:19
MAW
Hexachbrocyplopentadiene
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
& t;/W
18:19
MAW
Hexachtoroethane
< 10
ug I L
10
6270
516100
18:19
MAW
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<10
ug1L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
Isophorom
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
N-Nitroso-di-n-propyiamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18,19
MAW
N-NRmS%liphe%4amine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
18:19
MAW
Naphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
NRrobenzerle
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
18:10
MAW
Pentachtorophenol
< W
ug / L
50
8270
616/00
18:19
MAW
Phenanthrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6J 6/00
16:19
MAW
Phenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
516/00
18:19
MAW
Pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
6/ 6/00
18:19
MAW
-)e" Dithboarbamate Pesticides (as Nabam) 13.11 ppb 2 =.1 616/00 15:10 SDJ
Pesticides
4,4'-DDD
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7100
20;59
SDJ
4,4'-DDE
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
617100
20:59
SDJ
4,4'-ODT
<0,1
ug/L
0.1
8080
6/7/00
20:59
SDJ
Aldrin
{ 0.05
ug / L
0.05
6050
617/OQ
20:59
SDJ
alpha-BHC
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:59
SDJ
alpha -Chlordane
< 1
ug / L
1
8060
6/ 7/00
20:59
SDJ
alpha-Endosulfan
0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/7/00
20:59
SDJ
Aredor 1016
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617/00
20:59
SDJ
Aroalor 1221
< 1
ug I L
1
8080
617/00
20:59
SDJ
Arvcbr 1232
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:59
SDJ
ArocW 1242
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:59
SDJ
ArocW 1245
01
ug / L
1
8080
617100
20:59
SDJ
Arooior 1254
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:69
SDJ
Aroclor 1260
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
517100
20:59
SDJ
beta-BHC
<0.05
ug 1 L
0.05
8080
617100
20:59
SDJ
beta-Endosulfan
<0.1
ug I L
0.1
6080
617100
20:59
SDJ
delta-BHC
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
sow
6/ 7100
20:59
SDJ
Dieldrin
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7100
20:59
SDJ
Endosulfan sulfate
< 0.4
ug / L
0.4
8080
6/ 7100
20:59
SDJ
Endrin
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
617/00
20:59
SDJ
Endrin aldehyde
< 0.2
ug / L
0.2
8080
6/ 7100
20:59
SDJ
gamma -Chlordane
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7100
20:59
SDJ
Heptachlor
<0.05
Ug/L
0.05
8080
617/06
20:59
SOJ
Heptachlor Epoxide
<0.05
ug / L
0105
8080
617100
20:59
SDJ
t-indane (gamma-BHC)
<0.05
ug / L
0.05
8080
617/00
20:59
SDJ
Methoxychlor
< 1
ug 1 L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
20:59
SDJ
Friday, June 23, 2000
Nge 2 of 3
90'd
`/-S:20
1O-80-SEW
11

OF
I.abReport 107243 Result MDL Method Dale Torte Analyst
Pg�ticides
Toxaphene < 3 ug / L 3 sow 6/ 7/00 20-59 SDI
Formaldohyde 1 1 mg / L 1 CTA 5/26/00 14:50 SAG
I hereby certify that the analytical procedures employed are those approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or other applicable ine_thods. for these analyses.
Friday, June 23, 2000
Page 3 of 3
LO"d `dL5=80 ZO-SO-/clew

ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
1550 37TH STREET, NE North Curvilira Certif/cat/r»jft 340
CLEVELA,ND" TI'NNESSEE 37312 tearecsee vent/f/calim-N 02034
(423) 476 - 7766 Fax [phone]
Lab Report 107244
3906
Buncombe County Hazardous Waste Office
Attention: Ms. Dense Ballew
30 Talley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
H.Y. Greenhouses Snuth Mill Creek Sample Information
Kara & Kolors Sainrk� #3 Water
T _Y_ n
Date Received 5/26/2000
Date Strtnpled 05/25/2000
Date Requested 6/ 9/2000
Rush Statits Normal
Phone (828) '250-5425
❑Fax [phone]
PO#
gut/ ANG /Vr4 lu/1-%% _
ue-suit
MDL
Mefltod
Date
Time Analyst
&tni-Volatile$ 8270
1,2,4-Trichl woWrizene
< 10
ug / L
10
B270
616/00
19:10
MAW
1,2-Dichbro4enzene
CIO
ug / L
10
8270
610100
19:10
MAW
1,3-Dkhlwro ozone
< 10
ug 1 L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19.10
MAW
IA-D{chWot enzene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
2,4.5-TrlchloMphenot
<50
ug / L
50
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
2,4,6-Trlohlorophenol
K 10
ug t L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
2,4-DWllorophenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
615/00
19:10
MAW
2,4-Dimelhylphenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6l 6/00
19:10
MAW
2,4-DIrthrophenol
<50
ug 1 L
50
8270
6/ 6100
19;10
MAW
2,4-Dirdrotoluene
c 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
2-Chloronaphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
610100
19:10
MAW
2-ChlorWmnol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
2-Methyl11,6-dinitrophenol
<50
ug IL
50
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
2-Methyinaphthalem
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
2-Methylpberwl
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/6/00
19:10
MAW
2-NkManiline
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
B/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
2-Nitrophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
e270
616/00
19:10
MAW
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidlne
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
3-methyl, 4-chlorophenoi
{10
Up / L
10
6270
616/00
19:10
MAW
3-Nitroanlllne
<60
ug 1 L
50
9270
6t 6/00
19:10
MAW
4-8Mntophenyi phenyl ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
4-Chloroanillne
c 10
ug / L
10
B270
616/00
19:10
MAW
4-Chiorophenyl phenyl ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
$/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
4-Methyrphenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
4-Nkroaniline
<50
ug 1 L
50
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
4-14nrophend
.450
ug / L
so
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Acenaphthene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
B16100
19:10
MAW
Acenaphthylene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
13/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
Anthracene
.410
ug t L
10
5270
6/ 5100
19:10
MAW
Benzo(a)anthracene
< i a
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
Benzo(a)pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Benzo(b)fluroanthene
a 10
ug 1 L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Benzo(g.h.)perylene
c 10 .
ug / L
10
e270
616/00
19:10
MAW
Benzo(k)tluoranthene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
Benzole acid
< 50
ug / L
so
6270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
Benzyl alcohol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
1910
MAW
Friday, .hone 23, 2000
Page I of 3
SO' d V/-S =80 10-80-SEW

Lab Report
107244
Result.
MDL
Method
Date
Time
A11a! st
Semi-Volglifes 8270
-
9is(2-chloroethgxy)methane
< 10
ug 1 L
to
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
6is(2-chfwoethyl)ether
< 10
ug I L
10
6270
6/ 61 0
19.10
MAW
AW2-chkxasoprop&ther
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
81S(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
Butyl benzyl phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
19.10
MAW
Chrysene
< 1 ❑
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
di-n-Butyl phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6I 6ID0
19:10
MAW
dl-n-Octytphlhalate
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
< 10
ug I L
10
$270
6/ 6100
19A O
MAW
Dibenzofuran
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
Diethyl phthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
01methylphthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6(6/00
19:10
MAW
Fluoranthene
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Ftuorene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
1910
MAW
Hexi3chlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ WOO
19:10
MAW
HexachWobutadiene
.410
ug / L
10
8270
b/ 6ro0
19;10
MAW
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
610/00
19:10
MAW
Hexachloroethane
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrem
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Isophorone
"10
ug / L
10
8270
61 1510Q
19:10
MAW
N-NitrowAi-n-propylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616I00
19:10
MAW
N-Nltrosodimethylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
s/ VOO
19:10
MAW
N-N trosWohenylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
19:10
MAW
Naphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
$270
616100
19:10
MAW
Nitrobenzene
e 10
ug I L
10
8270
61 &'W
19:10
MAW
PentachloropherKA
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
616100
19:10
MAW
Phenanthrene
10
ug] L
10
8270
616/00
19:10
MAW
Phenol
< 10
ug / L
10
827D
616100
19:10
MAW
Pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
19:10
MAW
- : ' Dilhioc:arbamate Pesticide¢ (as Nabam)
4.28
ppb
2
630.1
6/ 6/00
18:54
SDJ
Pesticides
4,4'-000
<0.1
ug / L
O'l
8080
617/Do
21:35
51DJ
4,4'-DDE
<0.1
ug I L
0.1
BOBO
617/00
21:35
SOJ
4,4'-DDT
<0.1
ug / L
011
8080
6/ 7/00
21:35
50J
Alddn
< 0.05
ug / L
0.05
$0$0
617/00
21:35
SDJ
alpha-BHC
a 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
617/00
21:M
SDJ
atpho-Chlordane
< 1
ug / L
1
bow
617100
21:35
SDJ
alpha-Endosulfan
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
21:35
SDJ
Aroclor 1016
< 1
ug I L
1
8080
6/ 7I00
21:35
SDJ
Aroclor 1221
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
21;35
SDJ
Aroclor 1232
< 1
ug I L
1
6080
6/ 7100
21:35
SDJ
Aroclor 1242
< 1
ug I L
1
8080
6/ 7100
21:35
SDJ
Arcclor 1245
e 1
ug I L
1
8080
6/ 7100
21:35
SDJ
Aroclw 1254
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7/00
21:35
SDJ
Arcclor 1260
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/ 7100
21,35
SDJ
beta-BHC
< 0.05
ug I L
0.05
8060
617/00
21:35
SDJ
beta-Endosulfan
<0.1
ug I L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
21:35
SDJ
delta-BHC
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7100
21:35
SDJ
Dielddn
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
W 7100
21:35
SDJ
Endosulfan sulfate
a 0.4
ug / L
0.4
0080
617/00
21.35
SDJ
Endrin
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8480
6/ 7/D0
21:35
S0J
Endrin aldehyde
<0.2
ug / L
0.2
8080,
617/00
21:35
SDJ
gamma -Chlordane
< 1
ug / L
1
8D50
6/ 7100
21:35
SDJ
Heptachlor
<0.05
ug / L
0.05
6080
617100
21,35
SDJ
Heptachlor Epoxide
<0.05
ug / L
0.05
8080
517/00
21:35
SDJ
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
<0.05
ug / L
0.05
8069
617/00
21.35
SDJ
Methoxychlor
< t
ug / L
1
BOBO
617100
21;35
SDJ
t''riday, hire 23, 2000 ]-age 2 of 3
60-d ves:20

Lab Report 107244 Result MDL Me -flip l Date 2'iure All;Ilyst ,
Pesticides
Toxaphene c 3 ug / L 3 a0a0 8/ 71DO 21:35 SDJ
I hereby certify that the analytical procedures employed are those approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or other applicable methods for these analyses_
Signed *Ak 'Z�
Ffiduy, lam 23, 2000
Page 3 of 3
0I'd V85=80 IO-80—SEW

V.
ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
1550 37T1 I STREET, NE Nnrili Curt'luta Certlfkafforiit 340
CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE 37312 7'ruresseeC:ert1J11-rioir#02n3a
(423) 476 - 7766 Fax: [phone]
Lab Report 107245
3906
Buncombe County Hazardous Waste Office
Attention: Ms. Denese Ballew
30 Valley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Sample InformationH.Y. Gr(t�nhouses Smith-MM Creek
Katy k Kolors Sample #4 Water
Date Received 5/26/2000
bate Sampled 05/25/2000
Date Requested 6/ 9/2000
Rust: Status Normal
Phone [phone]
❑Fax [phone]
PO#
c,ua iceporc tu•iZ4-lp
Itesuit
MIX
Method
Dale
Tide Analyst
Semi-Volatiles SZ70
1,2,4-TrIchloroWrizene
.410
ug 1 L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
1,2-Dlohlorobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
61 WOO
20:03
MAW
1,3-Diehlorobenzene
<10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
410
- ug I L,
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
2,4,5-Trlrhlorophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
2,4,6-Triahk wophenol
.410
ug / 1-
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
2,4-Dichkxophenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
fit t3100
20:03
MAW
-2.4-Dimethylphenol
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
2,4-Dinftrophenol
<50
ug I L
50
6270
616100
20;03
MAW
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
016/00
20:03
MAW
2-Chkxonaphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
2-Chlorophenol
K 10
ug 1 L
10
6270
616/00
20:03
MAW
2-MaIl yl-4,6dnitrophenol
< 50
ug / L
50
5270
616100
20;03
MAW
2-Methyinaphthalene
< 10
Ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
2-Methylphenoi
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
-2-141troaniline
< 50
ug 11,
50
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
2-Nitrophenof
< 50
ug / L
50
8270
6/ 6100
20:03
MAW
3,3-01chlarohenzkilne
< 10
Ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:0$
MAW
34nethyl, 4chkxophenol
< 10
Ug / L
10
$270
6/ 6/00
20;03
MAW
3-Nitroanlline
< 50
ug / L
50
6270
616100
20:03
MAW
4-Bromophenyl ph" ether
{ 10
ug / L
10
8270
6160
20-03
MAW
4-Chlomnlline
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
516/00
20:03
MAW
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 61W
20:03
MAW
4Methylphenoi
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
20:03
MAW
4-Nitroarwine
< 50
ug I L
50
0270
616100
20:03
MAW
4-NItropheW
< 50
ug 1 L
50
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
Acenephthene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
6/ 5100
20:03
MAW
Acenaphthylene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Anthracene
CIO
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
eenzo(a)arftacene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6I 6100
20:03
MAW
Senzo(a)pyrene
< 10
ug I L
10
6270
6l 6100
20;03
MAW
Senzo(b)iluroanthene
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
13enzo(g,h.i)perylene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Benzo(k)fiwranthene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
20:03
MAW
Semoic acid
< w
ug I L
50
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Benzyl alcohol
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 6100
20:03
MAW
Fridgy, June 23, 2000 Page I of 3
it'd VR9:30 TO-80—SEW

-
Lab Report 1
>" _ 07245
Rcsr[ll _
MDI,
Metfror!
Date
�lirrrc.4ualyst
Sf.,mz-Volat7les 8270
Bi5(2-chloroethoxy)methane
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6100
20:03
MAW
Bi6(2-chloroethyl)ether
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
8ls(2-4-Ihlornisopropyl)ether
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Sis(2-9hyihexyl)phthalate
c 10
ug I L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
Butyl benzyt phthalate
c 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
20.03
MAW
Chrysene
e 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
di-n-Butyl phthalate
c 10
ug / L
10
B270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
di-n-0ctylphthalate
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Dlbenzo(a,h)enthracene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Dibertzoruran
.410
ug / L
10
8270
6/6/00
20:03
MAW
Diethyl phthalate
c 10
ug I L
10
8270
6/ 5/00
20:03
MAW
Dimethylphttlalote
c 10
ug / L
10
8270
(V 6/00
20:03
MAW
Fluoranthene
< 10
ug I L
10
6270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Flumene
< 10
ug / L
10
6270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Hexachlcrobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6/ 6/00
20:03
MAW
Hexechlorobutadlene
c 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
20:W
MAW
Hexachlorocyc"Vntadiene
c 10
ug / L
10
6270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Hexachlaroethane
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Indeno(1,2,3-0d)pyrene
c 10
ug / L
10
8270
616100
20:03
MAW
I60p110rvne
< 10
ug I L
10
8270
616/00
20;03
MAW
N-Nitr000-di-n-propylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
410
ug / L
10
8270
6/6100
20;03
MAW
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
516/00
20:03
MAW
Naphthalene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
6J 6100
20:03
MAW
Nitrobenzene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Pentachlorophenol
< 50
ug I L
50
B270
616100
20:D3
MAW
Phenenthrene
< 10
ug / L
10
B270
6/6100
20:03
MAW
Phenol
c 10
ug / L
10
8270
616/00
20:03
MAW
Pyrene
< 10
ug / L
10
8270
616M
20:03
MAW
Dhhiacarbamate Pesticides (as; Nabom) 2.13 ppb 2 630.1 616/00 19:38 SDJ
P�stice[les
.
4,4-DDD
<0.1
ug/L
011
8080
617/00
22:12
SDJ
4,4-DDE
<0.1
ug 1 L
0.1
8080
517100
22:12
SDJ
4,4-DDT
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
6/ 7/00
22:12
SDJ
Aldrin
<0.05
ug/L
0,05
8030
6/7100
22A2
SDJ
alpha-OHC
{0.1
ug I L
0.1
8080
617100
22:12
SDJ
alpha -Chlordane
c 1
ug I L
1
6080
6/ 7/00
22:12
SDJ
alpha-Endosulfan
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
8080
B/ 7/00
22:12
SDJ
ArocW 1016
< 1
ug I L
1
8060
B/ 7/00
22:12
SDJ
ArocW 1221
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617/00
22:12
SDJ
Aroclor 1232
c 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
Aroclor 1242
< 1
ug I L
1
8080
617/00
22:12
SDJ
Amclor 1248
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
ArwAm 1254
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
6/7100
22:12
SOJ
ArocW 1260
< 1
ug / L
1
8080
617100
22;12
S0J
beta-SHC
<0.05
ug / L
0.05
8080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
beta-Endosulfan
<0,1
ug/L
0.1
8080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
delta-BHC
< 0.1
ug / L
0.1
608o
617100
22:12
SDJ
Dieldrin
c 0.1
ug i L
0.1
8080
617/00
22:12
SDJ
Endosulfan sulfate
c 0.4
ug / L
0.4
8080
617/00
22;12
SDJ
Endrin
<0.1
ug / L
0.1
6080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
Endrin eldehyde
c 0.2
ug / L
0.2
BOBO
617100
22:12
SDJ
gamma -Chlordane
c 1
ug 1 L
1
5080
617/00
22:12
SDJ
Heptachlor
< 0.05
ug / L
0.05
8080
617100
22:12 ,
SDJ
Heptachlor Epoxide
<0.05
ug/L
0.05
8080
6/7100
22:12
SDJ
Undane(gamma-BHC)
<0.05
ug/L
0.05
8080
.617100
2212
SDJ
Methoxychlor
c 1
ug / L
1
BOBO
617100
22:12
SE)J
Friday, June 23, 2000 Page 2 of 3
Zi-d `d85=80

Late g port 107245 Result AIDL Method Date Time Analyst
Paddies
Toxaphene -43 ug / L 3 Soso 6/ WOO 22:12 sDJ
I hereby certify that the analytical procedures employed are those approved by the
Environmental Protection Agency or other applicable methods for uiese analyses.
i
r fiday, June 2.3, 2000
Page 3 of 3
£t I V2S:RO ZO-80-/,�L7W

JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
'- .`W/IYNEf MCDI
"'.SECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
GROUNDWATER SECTION
January 11, 2000
Mr. Charles Musgrove
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
P.O. Box 6618
Asheville, NC 28816
Dear Mr. Musgrove:
Subject: Clouse Property Clean-up
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
Groundwater Incident No. 17744
Buncombe County
I In
JAN I 12000 i
On January 7, 2000, we met with Mr. Charles Clouse for a discussion of his concerns
regarding impact to his property from Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. activities. Some
of his concerns are the impact to his pond and creek from pesticides, the fuel oil
contamination on his property adjacent to the creek, and the periodic occurance of oil in
the stream.
During the meeting, Mr. Clouse agreed that he would allow Hyman Young Greenhouses,
Inc. to conduct a cleanup of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination on his property.
The purpose of this letter is to inform you of Mr. Clouse's decision and to remind you of
the responsibility of Hyman Young Greenhouse, Inc. to continue the subject investigation
and to submit a corrective action plan (CAP) to address the petroleum hydrocarbon
contamination on the Clouse property.
Before the CAP is developed, I find it advisable to schedule a meeting between Hyman
Young Greenhouse Inc., your consultant, DENR representatives, and Mr. Clouse. The
purpose of the meeting is to discuss the development and implementation of the CAP for
the Clouse property.
I will be contacting you by January 14, 2000 to discuss a meeting date. If schedules
allow, I propose that the meeting be scheduled the first week in February. By copy of
this letter, I am informing your consultant, Mark Durway, of the intent of this meeting.
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

fiarles Musgrove
-.........y I ; 2000
Page 2
You may contact me at, [phone] upon receipt of this letter. 1 look forward to our meeting
and hopeful that a discussion of Mr. Clouse's concerns will lead to restoration of his property.
Sincerely,
Laura Kay Dechant
Acting Groundwater Environmental
Regional Supervisor
cc: Martha Peterson
Representative Wilma M. Sherrill
Charles Clouse
Mark Durway
Nann Guthrie
Forrest Westall
�fi!fa�Haner
Arthur 1VMouberry

NORTH R 6 W bA`AOL2—ikA bItOAR"T"migNt
twVIikO"i4MM4Ir AW6 NA*uk AL. 0Zk§6Ukz'6kii�:,,:
bivi§ION OF WA+9R;- Q6 OAL UTJ`Y--
0k0tJN1)WA-f8R SECTION
Nov'diiiber 13; 2000
mf: Charles, P-i douse
08 Cowan Cove Road
Asheville; North Carolina 28806
RIM
i
I)ddf Mr. douse:
§diffic6 Water §a*Ib k6siiiig
Hyman Young Gri66ithokige site
Incident No.: 117441
Buncombe County, N.C;
oti.August 30,-- 2000,1 collected two sudke" water sdiiiplies located on your
property The§Affiples Were C6116tted in response to your 6diddrft that dikcblbrdtibn of
surface Wdidf in two areas doiflid possibly be the result of pesticide 66iitAffiltiatibii from
a pbtdfitEA u0stfI , Ath source. A surface water sample Was b6fietted in the Ififitt6fit end, e
of your pond and iiii d pooled area of Smith Mill Creek lififiiedidt6ly adjacent to the
1.4yifiiifi Wiffig Otde-inlibubs'e- property poily Iiii, . Both of these water samples Wdrie- dfiaiilyzi6d
for the. complete Pesticide scan including big6hodfildiffid pesticides;
organ ,phosphorous pesticides; nitrogen pesticides and acid herbicides;
,�hog�horou§
13t&do-fiiheattaiched laboratory results, no pesticide oilidtbiIide coinpourids,
Were pie,§etit' at the Wild of samplilig uslitig these atialytical thethods. have attached a
"Ad Id6iiii6ry analytical sheets for your 'review and records.
copy of . I ur
NOV 1 4 2000 L
INTERCHANGE bUiLbika, 86 Woo'bFrih PLACE, AaHkviLLi, N''d i866i-2414
pk6N,k 8213-251-S2081 FAX 8J26-281-6482
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 5011b R6Yi"LEDA0% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

f
4
I I
✓r j 4',
Clouse
No"veniber 0, 2000
K5
1
Page of 2
} F J
Shoiild you have questions, please call the at [phone], ekt. 301. Thank you for
S�
your coiitiriued cooperatioii in this matter.
Sincerely;
0. Latidon Davidson, P.G.
Regional Groundwater Supervisor
Enclosure: Lab Results
cc: Terry L'eaiherwobd- Agriculture (%v/atts.)
Dept. of Agriculture — Pesticides Section
PO Bolt 595
Lake Junaiuska, NC 28745
Ivan Vikin
tls EPA CID
227 West Trade St.
Charloile, NC 28202
eNla�. l�anei�.,.DWQ AROa(w/atts
James S. R—ci UfY Pleticc ier Group — Asheville
linger Moore — Alpha Enviroriniental
g:\.:.gld\clouseiclo bsesur.doc

NOV - 8 2000
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
. - --ChelobtyLaboratory Beport/GroundWater Quality - .-Lab Number YG 7
Date Received : 9/ GmundwaW Sedw
:COUNTY .: ',BUNCOMBE ; SAMPLE PRIORITY Time Received : 830
'QUAD NO: .ROUTINE TINE -Received By 1b�
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY
.COLLECTOR(S) : DAVMSON
`Released By : DS
DATE: lamW❑ SAMPLE TYPE Date reported: l
TB�lr//00
:
PURPOSE: Owner. COWAN COVE ROAD
Location or Site:
- �Meutiption of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remala:
LABORATORY..ANALYSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
Diss::Solid£70300 raga,
COD High 340 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
COD Law'335 mg/L
Hadnes: total 900 mg/L
Colifolm:-MF Fed 31616 /10DMI
Hardness: (non-carb) 902 mg/L
Col'dorm: MFTota131504 /I OOmI
Pbenols 32730 uFJL
TOC mgA
Specific Cod. 95 umhos/cm2
Turbitity NTU
Sulfate mg/L
Residue., Suspended530 mg/L
Sulfide745 mg/L
Total Susparded solids mg/L
MBAS mv/L
Oil and Grease .mg&
PH units
Silica mc/I.
Alkalinity to PH 4.5 mgfL
Boron
Alkalinity.to pH 8.3 mg&
Formaldehyde mg/L
`
Carbonate mwL
NH3 as N 610 MS&
Bilarboraft mg/L
TKN as N 625 Ing/L
Carbon dioxide mg/L
NO2 4NO3 as n 630 mg&
Chloride mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
Chr imn:'Hex 1032 uen
PO4 m_c1L
Cobs True 8o C.U.
--'
Cyanid. 20 men
COMMENTS:
Ag-iilver46566 ug/L .
AI -Aluminum 46557 mg/L
As-Arsenic46551 ug/L
Ba-Barium46558 u¢/1,
Co -Calcium 46552 . mg/L
Cd-Cadium 46559 ,ugti
Cr-Chromium 46560
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe-lmn 1045 ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 uvfL .
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mv/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 119/1,
Net- Sodium 929 mg/L
Ni-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
S . erium ug/L
Zn Zinc46567
X ' Organorhlorine Pesticides
A Orgaiwphosphoms Pestia
X Nitro¢en Pesticides
X Acid Herbicides

Gi3011NDJNl1'fER:FIELD/LAB FOANCHAO� �J���Y
County '3unt��r� I -SA�M.'P."LE"TYPE �MPL€PfljoLa
Quad Not�lK-TuJ Serial No. 1. .waler EHoullne
-
I_nl. 3S13s(� Long �2 L•3z IS'y []°Boll ❑Emergency
[� Other
Report To: 10,,PRO,'MRO, RRO,'WaRO, WiRO, Ill J*Mhaln of Custody
WSRO, (inslon FO, Fed.Trust, Central Off., Other:
Shipped by: Bus, C0570r, Hand Del., Other-
Departrnent=oCEnvlronment, I-lealih,And `Natural.nesources
'DIVISION .OF_WATEn Ql1ALITY-.GROUNDWAT:En SECTION
Lab Number
MU
-Dale Received �-J.— 1 UU Time . Z '
Rec'd by From: B Courier, I i d Del.,
Other:
Data:Enlry By: Ck:
Dale Reporled:
'Purpose: Colleclor(s):. 0" O%sy- Date, CR 161w -Time -Baseline, Complaint, Compliance`LUST, Pesticide.Sludy, Federal Trust, ��W _ (?n�( Y
FIELD ANALYSES Owner.__ aGt+a� s G-voOS� 4�"1°�)
pHSpec.r' Spec. Cond. al 250 C Location or site 'IS G—„a�
Temp.ro oC Odor. "a Description of sampling point - 5LAkt-t`t� MLc.L cr- -STr--*— ov cwus;�­ 1P"Pzf-T4
Appearance Sampling Method *ram` FG;�.4�'1-%N: Sample Interval
Field Analysis By: Remarks, ip°`"r"' °"'"'°"
LABORATORY ANALYSES :UAv hvIhno.°Irlow.ple.)
tab .Comments:
=GW-84'nEV.7198. ForDissolved.Analysis-:subrnlClillored.sample.and write °MS",In hinclf

REPORTED.BY :KK
ZHECKED'BY AD
ENRLDWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
.CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY:ELECTRON .CAPTURE DETECTION
LAB NO. YG1347
SUPERVISOR W9 K
DATE &'D
ENTERED BY .'
DATE
15972.60.8
ALACHLOR
0.08
U
72-20.8
ENDRIN
0.01
U
309-M2
ALDRIN
0.01
U
7421-93-4
ENDRINANDEHYDE
0.01
U
.1912-24-9
AIRAZINE
1.50
U
53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.02
U
3194"
BHC•ALPHA
0.01
U
.2593-15A
ETHAZALE
0.03
U
- 319.85-7
BHC-BETA
0.01
U
7644-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.01
U
319-86-8
'BHC-DELTA
0.01
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOREPOMDE
0.01
U
59-89-9
BHC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
030
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.10
U
'510 41-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.01
U
7243-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE GAMMA
0.02
U
238545-5
MIItFJC
0.02
U
:3734.48-3
Cl LORDENE
0.01
U
397654W-5
TRANS NONACHLOR
0A1
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.10
U
2688048-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.03
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZI ATE
030
U
52645.53-1
MDOD-PERMETE RIN
0.60
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.03
U
1918-16.7
PROPACHLOR
0.15
U
189745.6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.01
U
117-19-0
TECNA2RNE
0.01
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.01
U
1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.02
U
53-19-0
DDD, OF
0.03
U
12674-11-2
AROC 3LOR 1016
OSO
U
72-54-8
DDD, PP
0.01
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR MI
OSO
U
34244U
DDE, OF
0.02
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
OSO
U
72-55-9
DDE, PP
0.01
U
53469-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
789-02-0
DDT, OP
0.02
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
OSO
U
50-29-3
DDT, PP
0.01
U
11097-69-1
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.01
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
OSO
U
959 98 8
ENDOSULFAN I
0.01
U
37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
OSO
U
33213-65.9
ENDOSULFAN11
0.01
U
8001-35-2
TOXAPHEf1E
150
U
IMI-07.8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.01
U
UMDF2 TTFFIED PEAECS DEfECIFA
3
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON" CAPTURE' DETECTION
:50594-066
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.10
U
120-36.5
25057-89-0
-BENTAZAN
0.80
U
• 8&85=7
133-90.4
CHLORAMBEN
'0?0
U
7600.50-2
-94=75-7
2,4-D
0.40
U
100412.7
94-SM
_2,4-DB
0.80
-U
.97-86-5
.DCPA(ACID.METABOLITES)
'0.10
U
1918-02-1
191840-9
DICAMBA
030
U
93-76.5
51-36-5
3,5 DICHLOROBENZ:OIC ACID
0.60
U
93-72-1
'DICHLORPROP
0.60
U
DINOSEB
0.20
U
'5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
0.10
U
4-NnROPHENOL
.320
U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP)
0.05
U
PICLORAM
020
U
2,4;5:T
0.10
U
.2,4,5-TE (SIIAEX)
0.10
U
_ UNIDENTIFIED -PEAKS IDETECTED _
T

LAB # YG1347
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ .LAB PAGE.2
°ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES'SY'FLAMEI-PHOTOMETRIC'DETECTION
., :. ::.v: :..:.. :.... .. ...• ::: .;f .. �}.f:::::. r.. ..v �S..r. ..•:w. r. .{{.. .n:q x:::::x. /:G.. ..r:
. +%... ;[.4::::.r.�:.r ..v:. ........v:}:rf.?::.:�l. vvv vM: \�n•.. :nx r::.-: v;f.. .../n .v:.. v.. .n... x....Nn ............. :.:ni'::.ivvA'/F:� r.•.{+: is :iif :::{:itiiYi ...
...,:......:...........:,z..v...r:...,.........€.�SIF.....,........:rf...:��i:....r..v.....:.vr............:.
............r:�... s�yµpyy
., :::.v..: x-v w::.v :.; .....v....n... \'�.L•...\:v::.::..:.vxv: v:::: }:: x:: r:.?.x rAvv vvv:::?:x:::v-vu............. .v.�.r.;.vn......... .........:::...v.... ..t:. :...... ..:Cr ..... .:?{n}y v:'?:j.'::};?:tv:': - is?'l.:•:ry':�AIJc�
- - ,...........v..........:....:........x.::v:::.....n..x........v..............x ... .. ..v. . .......n.x. . . . ......... r,....:......... n.............. .... :....:.::v:: :.:: n.. .......:........: }.v:. r::::..v.r..........:. .. r......................:..... .hm... i$iii....:: ..... -....
'786-19.6
CARBOPHENOTHION
0.8
U
5538-9
FENTHION
0.4
U
2921$82
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.4
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOMON
A.8
U
784&8
'DEF
0.4
U
150.50.5-,
FOLEX (MERPHOS, TRRBUFOS)
:20.0
U
:298-03-3
DEMETON
0.8
U
6923-224
MEVMHOS
0.4
U
333■11-5
'DIAZINON
0.4
U
300-76.5
MONOCROTOPHOS
0.8
U
,.62_73=7
DICHLORVOS
0.4
U
56-39-2
NALED
-0.8
U
.60-51-5
DII4=0ATE
-0.4
U
299-MO
El-HYLPARATHION
0.4
U
:2984)4-4
DISULFOTON
0.8
U
298-02-2
A9ETliYL"PARATHION
0.4
U
24974)6-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
0.4
U
2994 4-3
'PHORATE
0.4
U
2497-07.6
MISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.4
U
-2104145
:EPN
0.4
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP.
0.4
U
'563-12.2
ETHION
0.4
U
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
0.4
U
13194.48-4
ETHOPROP
0.4
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
-NITROGEN 'PESTICIDES ;BY`NP `DETECTION
15972-60-8
ALACHLOR
5.0
U
21087.64-9
METRIBUZIN
5.0
834-125
AIVMMYN
1S
U
11348.4
MGK264
20.0
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
15
U
2212 67-1
MOLINATE
1.5
31440.9
BROMACII-
10
U
15299-99.7
NAPROPAMIDE
10.0
23194.66.9
BUTACHLOR
10
U
.27314-13.2
NORFLURA7.ON
5.0
2008.41-5
BUTYI ATE
15
U
1114-712
PEBULATE
1.5
U34-08-5
CARBOMN
10
U
1610-18-0
PRON=N
15
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
5-0
U
7287-19.6
PROMETRYN
15
292149-2
CBLORPYRIFOS
OS
U
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
5.0
21725.46.2
CYANAZ[NE
25
U
.13940-2
PROPAZINE
1S
.1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
15
"U
122,34-9
SAIAZINE
1.5
333414
D1AZINON
OS
U
1014-70.6
SBIMMYN
1.5
-957-51-7
DBPHENAMID
5.0
U
34014-18-1
TEBUTffiIIRON
.5.0
759 94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
15
U
'5902-51-2
TERBACII
20.0
22224-92.6
PENAMIPHOS
5.0
U
7786.34-7
TERBUFOS
-0.5
'51735-04.2
HEXAZINONE
5.0
U
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
15
'5121845-2
METOLACHLOR
5.0
U
-1929-77-7
NERNOLATE
1Z
-UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
TQL- Target -Quantitation-Limit, Subject -to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change_due'to instrument sensitivity
D-;Detected.below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
:E-' Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this•compound but not detected
COMMENTS: `NITROGEN' AND`ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES ANALYZED-OUT'OF-HOLD'TIME
n
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U

:Dr MION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry.Laboratory Report/Ground Water Quality
COUNTY: -BUNCOMBE SAMPLE PRIORITY
QUADNO: X❑ROUTINE ❑EMERGENCY
REPORTTO ARO Regional Office X❑ CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLECfiOR(S) ::DAVIDSON
DATE: 1Fd9(9Q ❑W SAMPLE TYPE
TIME
TURPO.SE: Owner. '98 COWAN COVE ROAD
location or Site:
'Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
LABORATORY.ANAL,YSIS
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 =mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifam:-MF Fecal31616 /1001,111
Colifonn MFTota131504 /100m1
TOC -gA
Turbidly NTU
Residue., Suspended 530 mg/L
Total Suspended solids -melt
PH units
A11afmity to pH 4.5 mg/L
ARaliddy to pH'83 mg/L
Carbonate mg/L
•
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbon dioxide .mg/L
Chloride rmg/L
Chromium:, Hex 1032 -ug/L
Cobs Tme80 C.U.
Cvaride.720 •melt.
COMMENTS:
Diss. Solids 70300 melt
Fluoride 951 mvJL
Hardness: total 900 me/L
Hardness: (non-earb) 902 me/L
Phe ots 32730 ug/L
Specific Coed. 95 umhos/cam2
Sulfate mg/L
Sulfide 745 ma/L
MBAS mglL
Oil and Grease -9/L
Silica mg/L
Boron
Formaldehyde mg/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
TKN as N 625 mg/L
NO2 +NO3 as n 630 mg/L
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 mg/L
AgSilver 46566 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 46557 uSIL
-
As-Arsenic46551 ug/L
Ba-Barium 46558 ' ug/L
Ca -Calcium 46552 mgfL
Cd-Cadium 46559 ug/L
Cr-Chromium-46560 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Fe- Iron 1045 491L
Hg- Mercury 71900 ug/L
K-Potassium 46555 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
-
]T-Nickel ug/L
Pb-Lead 46564 ug/L
Se -Selenium :ug/L
Zn.Zinc46567 ug/L
LebNumber : Y1i13�11
.Date Received : 9/
Tine Received :
.830 AM
Received By
JG
Released By :
DS
Date reported :
I In/oo
IX I Organoehlorine Pesticides I
X I Or¢anoohosvhoms Pesticides
IX I Acid Herbicides I
Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
TPH-Gasoline Range
TPH-BTEX Gasoline Ranee
Ygt350

"CIIOI-ND1tIlATT� I=1ELD/LAD F013M _
County ALMPL`E7TYPE IAMP�HJQRUJ�
:Q11ad"No - �Serial'Nn• 9f Waler WRoullne
�( []`Boll n Emercdency
I_riL. 3 3S"Izc, Long. 'V-al-7[] Other
-
Departmeni o1:Envlronmenl;iHeallli and. Nalural'Resources
DIVISION ORWATER'.QUALITY - GROUNDWATEWSECTION
Lab'Number.
Dale -Receive '
Rec'd b � From:
Olher:.
Time
, Land Del.,
Reporl To: 0,'FRO,•MRO,:RRO, WaRO, WIRO, Chain-of:Custody Dala'Enlry:B.y: • Ck:
WSRO, Kinslon'FO,'Fed. Tntsl, Central Off., Other: Dale-Reporled:
Shipped by: Bus, ur r, Hand Del., Other-
- _--Purpose:
,Colleclof(s): Dale, b &0 Time 4- 30 Baseline, Complaint, ComplianceLLLUS�T, Peslickle:Sludy, Federal Trust, Olher.'��' "�- i-72
FIELD A ALYSES Owner Gres
phl Spec..Cond.94 al 250 C -Location or site 4`a C.MwAa C.-I_ t S�+tvw
Te p.,o oC Odor N9 Description of sampling point
Appearance Sampling Method, -sftv-11L Z-6+—P�sLn Sample Interval
Fiel&Analysis.By: c Ln Remarks r''-YXb2ft•filr-1
:I ARnIRATORY ANAI Y.4FS tmffrop lima. W 1enpsp1¢.)
•BOD, " 3.10 ingA
Diss: Solids 711300 mall
An - Stiver 46566 AlLn
` .,�L-
Organochlorine Pesticides
,COD High 340 mg/l.
_
`
Flourlde-951 mj1l
Al - Aluminum 46557 ugn
;,;
org anophosphorus Pesticides
COD Low'335 mg/1
Hardness: -Total 900 mglL
As -'Arsenic 46551 ue/l
-d'
Nitrogen Pesticides
:Colllorm: MF'Fecal 31616 %100ml
_
•
Hardness (non-carb) 902 mg/1
Ba -'Barium 45558 U-0
'
Acid Herbicides
_
-Colilonn:-MF Total 31504 /100ml
_
iUlols-32730 un/)_
Ca - CalclUm•46552 m2/l
- _
PCB's
_
TOC 680 rnc,Ln
_
;
SRJIIr CntLI B5 r
Cd - Cadmium 46559
Turbldily 76 NTU
_
Sullale 945 mall
Cr - Chromkrm 46560 ug./l
Residue.,Suspended 530 mg/l
_
SUllide 745 mg/l
Cu - Copper 46562 A 01
_
Fe - Iron 46563 110
- _
Semivolalile Organics
_
Oil and Grease mac 11
1-Ig -.Mercury 71900 ugfl
:; _
TPI I - Diesel Mange
.:pl-I 403 units
K - Polassium 46555 mgll
Alkallnllyao pl-1-4.5 4111 mgll.:
_
Mn - Magnesium 46554 In21
_
Alkalinity.lo:pl-I'8.3 -415 mg/I
_
Mn - Manganese 46565 ug/l'-
Carbonate 445 mgfl
'
NI I, as' N .6f0 IA,
Na - Sodium 46556 :mg/1
^ _
Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
BlcarbonaleA40 mall
_
TIM as Ny.4 -mplL
Ni_ilickel Al
. _
TPH - Gasollne-Range
Carbon-dioxide-4o5 mgfl
_
NOS +'N0. as'N 630 mdfl =
Pb- Lead 46564 ugflY
TPI I BTEX'Gosollne'Range
sChlorlda 940 --mg/1
P:"Total as`P665 -mgA'=
Se =Selenium trail`
.Chromlum: Hex 1032 ug/I '
4 —
-Zn - Zinc 46567 u
_
=,Colon-7-rue•80 Cu
_
Cy6rilde,720 mgA
_
=
.Lab -"Comments:
G*fi4:nEV.:7/9P--, For.DlssolvedAnalysls-:subrnil-'lilteredsampleand .wrlle'"DIS",in:Work

..
:ENR/DWQ.LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT ;
LAB NO.
YG1350
'
` 'REPORTEDBY.
KK
SUPERVISOR'S
DATE
` CHECKED:BY
AD
_REVIEWED BY
-KK
: -
ENTERED:BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE
SAMPLE TYPE:
'WATER
CHLORINATED.PESTICIDESBY:ELECTRON-CAPTURE: DETECTION
�.�}
......... ..........r�,. n.::::
v::::::::>:w:::::.:?w........::.v:::......C�.::::
n.}iv::::::r?n....:: w.-:::}:{\%?G::
nv:: .. - - ...........::.....vn,;v:::: v:.:v
f.....:: n.................
......... f.::::::
.
i.{n}:4ii.:ti' .
:. ;.... ... .. :{v}.v:
. ..nn.. v. ......
r•: w::::: v:.
..{{4:{i`.....................?.:?•}i:{.}}}:'.};nn};:.}:.:'::::::.:w:
-.v: . . ........
n... .: .........
nv:::::::AY w: :.: ...
-:::: w:::::::.vw::::::
h.r:..:...:::::::.vv .. ....
nt................... ..
rv..: . . . . . . . ......................
v. ........... :....:::: -.- :v.:.v. n............n .....................v
.... n.........: -t .. tv.......... x...:xw:::::. ;. n.
...... ....n. .t - n ..n.....n .. .n.n.... .. {.................
w::.v...............................................
. . y.. +.: . ....
..n..............
n..........:.
:............:..........::.::.v:::::: {:.v:: m:::::::..v.:-:::::::b}:4}}}i}:
:.nv .......:....:::::::::nvvv::::. :vv.v.:. :�.yy�{�. �y��yv.::::-:.-:: v.}:??•yi{i'r•}}}}}::::::: ::::::::
:nv::nv::::: •t:•: n.::::::::::::::::.w::::.: • .....:..
Sae]Lu£�iV]Z�Zf.<'-}}:iti:v::}::rw:::?•::•:.v:::}
.... - ..... -
}i:•}:::i::::::.v}:n:{-}:::L:?•%-i:-}iv}i:?.}}}i}}:{^}:•:ti }}}}}}:•}:4}•::::.-:.v.:+..
{: v'rw: ... ...................... .. ...•::.v::: w::::
. v......
...... .:.s..... :.::::::.-::::: n}.; vp:::::,v:v:: ^:.-::: {:wh-::::.-:::ii;'}f;:d`
......:n::•:::.x:v.}w.v:::. nv;:::r:
.........: v::::::.:-::..:. r.. r............... r.•r......... n......:..........
.:.}-.-:::: n;: w:.:}w:i:�•}:}}}}}%i {}}:y};y-}:•}i}:i: r'}}}:-}}}}:::::::
v. :v::.-::: ........ .- ..
f[ ....::.::. r:::::....:v:::.w::::::..
:.: n•.'- 'tiGl�iv}isti::�}i?ii:::.:ii:iviiji}iiiiii}`,:i'.�:}r.:
... .:..
ny.}�::v:}}ii}}}id}}}}}y}}}}}i:v:{•; }}r:}:?6}}}}:?-}:L'r}}}}}:
...... ..... ............................... ...
.... ♦�
.........
..
15972-60.8
ALACHLOR
0.08
U
72-204
ENDRIN
0.01
U
30940.2
ALDRIN
0.01
U
7421-93-1
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.01
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZDM
150
U
.53494-70-5
ENDRINBE'I.ONE
0.02
U
.319.84.E
-BHC-ALPHA
0.01
U
.2593-15.9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85=7
BHC-BETA
0.01
U
76■34-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.01
U
3194"
BHC-DELTA
0.01
U
102 -57-3
HEPTACHLOREPOMDE
0.01
U
58-89.9
BHC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
119-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.01
U
.57-74.9
CHLORDANE, TMEMCAL
0.30
U
121-75=5
MALATHION
0.10
U
5103-71-9
CHLORDANE•ALFHA
0.01
U
72-43-5
METHOXYCHLOR, PP
0.05
U
'5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.02
U
2385-85-5
IMEX
0.02
3734�8 3
CHLORDENE
0.01
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.01
U
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.10
' U
26880.48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.03
U
501-15-6
CHLOROBENZIL ATE
030
U
52645-53.1
MDMD-PERIMITHRIN
0.60
292148-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.03
U
1918-167
PROPACHLOR
0.15
U
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONII-
0.01
U
117-1&0
TECNAZENE
0.01
U
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.01
U
1592-09-3
TRIFLURALIN
0.02
U
53-IM
DDD, OP
0.03
U
VA74-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
OSO
U
72-54.8
DDD, PP
0.01
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLORMI
OSO
- 3424-82.6
DDE, OP
0.02
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR W2
030
.0
U
72-55-9
DDE,PP
•0.01
U
53469-21-9
AROCIILOR1242
0.50
U
799-02-6
DDT, OP
0.02
U
12672-29.6
AROCHLOR 1248
OSO
U
50-29.3
DDT, PP
0.01
U
1ID97-69-1
AROCBWR 1254
0.50
U
60-57.1
DMLDRIN
0.01
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
UO
U
959.98-8
ENDOSULFANI
'0.01
U
37324-23-5
AROCEILOR1262
0.50
U
.33213-65-9
ENDOSULFANE
0.01
U
8WI-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.01
U
UNIDENTIFED PEAKS DETEMW
4
ACID'HERBICIDES !BY
-ELECTRON CAPTURE -DETECTION
.:t:Y:\:. }::::i}:•:w::. .. q•.v,v::: ti}:-: .:?.w::v-nv.-.-:. ..... v:
vn.4�::::::}..x.............................. ..... n .w ... .' :}::::.v :.:::\.y..:+:•?:}}}}}:ti:4:��yy"yyam�{{}}//...................
•}}•-.vn............• .... v......: ...............................................::..:::n .... ....
.:..........n.......................vx::.: rv:::::n........ w::.:i:}:nw::::.: nv:::::: {::::.}w::::: ?:nv•:::.v
... h::.w:.
4....... .{........ :..vv....
::............. r.. n............:.. ......... r. \.... v...l......:..v::::::
vn....... ::•rv:...
....
k......v.��{}'
..n.:.+.::. {..v,.}n.......v
.:::::::::::::::::::{?..........
r:}n::":t,
..(�.� yy� � nh+}n'-}}:.b}`:::::::........ v::} .
:.........v........:....:.......
.......:........................... ..hx•:::.,-:
....... .. n.. rr........... .......,...
w::::: v.:: .:n-::::n.n.......: n. n.......... .. ........ .rY.
..n:r..... n.... n.......::v..v..:.v::::::i:r:::::n:.}}".vx}:: :.::::-}:•-r}Ti,'-i}}:L}ii::iS:
v........v.. ..v..{......::::.x. n::: }:::.t n........... . .......... r..... \:: - . v{...... i4\.......................
w::.-:: •: •:::::::.6::::?:: {.::.w:. vvi•::i-}:{:::::::.+v:::u::.-::: x: r::: n•:::: :...... : r.h\....v
}::.::m::::...........::;::C:v:::.v........v:................:.v......11 v.Sfl:.:::.,,-:::::}:?•}}:?}}•:nw.:?iG}v::::.,}}:::
n• ::::: r::::.-::::::.x:::::......:
...
50594.66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BIAZEBR)
0.10
U
120-36-5
MICHLORPROP
0.60
U
2505749.0
BENTAZAN
0.80
U
88-85-7
DINOSEB
020
U
133.90.4
CHLORAMBEN
020
_U
7600.50-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
0.10
U
•94-75-7
2,4-D
0.40
ZI
100-02-7
-4NrIR0PHEN0L
3.20
U
"9442.6
:2;4-DB
0.80
U
8748E-5
PENTACMDROPHENOL (PCP)
0.05
U
DCPA (ACID METABOLIMS)
0.10
U
1918-02-I
PICLORAM
020
1918-00 9
DICAMBA
0.10
U
93-76-5
.2,4,5-T -
0.10
.0
• 51-36.5
-3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.60
U
93-72-1
'2;4,5-TP (MVEX)
U
0.10
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
�'

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. YG1350
SUPERVISOR `REK
REPORTED -BY
KK
DATE '11/3/-2000
CHECKED.BY
AD
REVIEWED BY
KK
ENTERED.BY
ANALYSIS RESULTS
DATE .
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED 7PESTICIDES ,BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-60.8
ALACHLOR
0.08
U
72 2M
ENDRIN
0.01
U
309-00-2
- ALDRIN
0.01
U
7421-93-4
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
0.01
U
1912 24-9
ATRAZINE
1.50
U
SM94-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.02
U
319-84-6
BHC-ALPHA
0.01
U
2593-15 9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
U
319-85-7
BHC-BETA
0.01
U
76�"-8
HEPTACHLOR
0.01
U
319.86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.01
U
1024-57-3
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
0.01
U
58-89-9
BHC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
118-74-1
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0-01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.30
U
121-75-5
MALATHION
0.10
U
510371-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.01
U
72-43-5
MEI'HOXYCHLOR PP
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.02
U
2385.85.5
Nmax
0.02
U
3734 48 3
CHLORDANE
0.01
U
39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACHLOR
0.01
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.10
U
.26880.4"
OXYCHLORDANE
0.03
U
'SM-15.6
CHLOROBENZ L ATE
030
U
52645-53-1
MDED-PERMEiTiRIN
0.60
U
.2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFCS
0.03
U
1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0.15
U
1897-45-6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.01
U
117-18-0
TECNAZENE
0.01
U
186132-1
DCPA
0.01
U
1582-09.8
TRIFLURALIN
0.02
U
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.03
U
12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
050
U
72-54-8
DDD; PP
0.01
U
11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
050
U
3424-82-6
DDE, OP
0.02
U
11141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
72S5-9
DDE, PP
0.01
U
534b9-21-9
AROCHLOR 1242
050
U
'789-02-6
DDT, OP
0.02
U
12672-29-6
AROCHLOR1248
OSO
U
50-293
DDT, PP
0.01
U
11097-69-1
ARCKMOR 1254
050
U
-60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.01
U
11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
050
U
- 959-98.8
ENDOSULFAN I
0.01
U
37324-235
AROCHLOR 1262
050
U
:33213-65-9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.01
U
SMI-35-2
TOXAPH NE
150
U
103147-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.01
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DEFECTED
4
ACID HERBICIDES
'BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
.... ..............
....................................:.:::::::::::::::::..:::::�:,::::
�.Ins........................................ --. .�.---------...........:.........
.�
50594-6"
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.10
U
120-365
DICHL.ORPROP
0.60
U
-25057-89-0
BENTAZON
0.80
U
8835-7
DINOSEB
020
U
133-90.4
CHLORAMBEN
0.20
U
-760050-2
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
0.10
U
94-7 -7
Z4-D
0.40
U
100-02-7
-4-NFTROPHENOL
320
U
94 82 6
2,4-DB
0.80
U
87-8&,5
PENTACHL OROPHENOL (PCP)
0.05
U
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
010
U
1918-02-1
PICLORAM
020
U
19184)0-9
DICAMBA
0.10
U
93-76-5
2,4,5- T
0.10
U
51-365
3,5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.60
U
93-72-1
2 4 5 TP (SII VE)Q
010
U
UNIDENTIFIED;PEdKS DETECTED
'20

LAB* YG1350
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
S - "
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
itw-19-b
LAK60F ihNOTHION
OB
U
5538-9
FENTHION
o.4
U
2921-88-2
C iLORPYRIFOS
0.4
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
4.8
U
78-48-8
DEF
0.4
U
150-50-5
FOLEX (MERPHOS, TRIBUFOS)
20.0
U
'298-033
DFA=ON
0.8
U
6923-224
MEVINPHOS
0.4
U
33311-5
DIAZINON
0.4
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
0.8
U
•62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
0.4
U
56-38-2
NALED
0.8
U
6051-5
DRv=OATE
0.4
U
298.00-0
EI-HYL PARATHION
0.4
U
298-04.4
DLSULFOTON
0.8
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
0.4
U
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
0.4
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
0.4
U
2497-07-6
DLSULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.4
U
.2104-64-5
EPN
0.4
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.4
U
563-12-2
ETHION
0.4
U
778634-7
TERBUFOS
0.4
U
13194.48-4
ETHOPROP
0.4
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60.8
ALACHLOR
5.0
U
21097-64-9
MEMMUZIN
5.0
U
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1.5
U
113-48-4
MGK 264
20.0
U
1912 24-9
ATRAZINE
1.5
U
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
1.5
U
314 40-9
BROMACIL
10
U
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
10.0
U
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
10
U
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
5.0
U
2008-41.5
BUTYLATE
1.5
U
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
1.5
U
52234-68-5
CARBOXIN
10
U
1610-18-0
PROMETON '
1.5
U
101-213
CHL.ORPROPHAM
5.0
U
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
1-5
U
2921.88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.5
U
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
5.0
U
2172546-2
CYANAZINE
2 5
U
13940-2
PROPAZINE
1.5
U
1134-23-2
CYCLOATE
1.5
U
M-34-9
SIMA23NE
1-5
U
333 415
DLAZINON
OS
U
1014-70.6
SIMETRYN
1.5
U
95751-7
DRIMNAMID
5.0
U
34014-18-1
TERMULIRON
5.0
U
759-944
EFI'C (EPTAM)
1.5
U
590251-2
TERBACIL
20.0
U
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
5.0
U
778634.7
TERBUF06
OS
U
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
5.0
U
88650-0
TERBLTIRYN
1.5
U
51218-45.2
NMOLACHLOR
5.0
U
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
1-5
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
-0
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity
D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS: 2NITROGEN AND ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES ANALYZED OUT OF HOLD TIME

NORTI4 CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
GROUNDWATER SECTION
March 28, 2000
Mr. Charles E. Clouse
98 Cowan Cove Road
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
RE: Sediment Sampling Results
Clouse Property
Hyman Young Greenhouse Site
Incident No.: 17744
Buncombe County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Clouse:
On February 15, 2000, I sampled stream and pond sediment from two areas
located on your property. The sediment samples were analyzed for organochlorine
pesticides and organophosporus pesticides. These analyses included endosulfan I and
II as these compounds were known to have been released to the subject area in the
past. Petroleum constituents were not analyzed during this particular sampling event.
Analysis for petroleum contaminants is required of the responsibly party, Hyman
Young Greenhouses. It is readily apparent that fuel oil contaminated soil is present on
your property.
Laboratory results from these samples indicate that at the time of sampling,
.,.;,�,i,,,',-'-u_ s,r.,:'..*s•E endosulfan I, endosulfan II and endosulfan sulfate were present in sediment
samples labeled S-1 and S-2. Please note that the sample results are given in
Mg/Kg (milligrams per kilogram or roughly equivalent to parts per million).
"Sediment sample S-1 was collected on the Clouse property immediately adjacent to
" Smith Mill Creek approximately two feet from the fence joining Hyman Young
? �e y;property. The S-1 location is approximately four feet from the corrugated
".t discharge pipe. The S-1 sediment sample was collected from a small sand bar at
the edge of the creek. Sediment sample S-2 was a composite sample collected
around the smaller pond bank where the inlet pipe is located.
I will forward a copy of the analytical results to the state epidemiologist to
determine if a health risk exists in regards to dermal contact. The health risk results
will be forwarded to you upon my receipt.
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ouse
Page 2 of 2
March 28, 2000
Should you have questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 301. Thank
you for your continued cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
G. Landon Davidson, P.G.
Regional Groundwater Supervisor
Enclosure: Lab Results
cc: Terry Leatherwood — Agriculture (w/atts.)
Dept. of Agriculture — Pesticides Section
PO Box 595
Lake Junaluska, NC 28745
Ivan Vikin (w/atts.)
US EPA CID
227 West Trade St.
Charlotte, NC 28202
MaFe-sA(fs
9
g: \... g l d\cl o use\cl soil. doc

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Graved Water Quality
COUNTY:
SAMPLE PRIORITY
_BUNCOMBE
QUAD NO
X❑ROUTINEEMERGENCY
:REPORTTO ARO Regional Office
X❑
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
COLLECTORS) : DAVIDSON
DATE: 211501111
SQ
SAMPLE TYPE
_TIME:
PURPOSE: Owner:
c.cl Ottci S 1
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOO 310 mg/Kg
COD High 340 m K
COD Tow 335 m
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
CAHfbniL MF Total 31504
TOC
Tattitity, NTU
Residue.. Suspended 530 m
Total Suspended solids mg/Kg
H units
An -lard to H 43
Alloilinity to pH 8.3 mg/Kg
Carbonate
Bicarbonate
Carbon dioxide
Chloride m
Chmmium: Hex 1032 n
Color. True 80 C.U.
de no mg/Kg
COMMEIM :
MAR 2 4 2000 1
Location or Site:
Description of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks
Diss. Solids 70300 mg/Kg
Fluoride 951 mg/Kg
Hardness: total 900 mg/Kg
Hardness: non-carb 902 mg/Kg
Phenols 32730 UgMg
,Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm2
Sulfate m
Sulfide 745
MBAS
Oat and Grease m
silica
Boron
,Formaldehyde mg/L
NH3 as N 610 mg/Kg
hKN as N 625 1119/4
NO2 +NO3 as n 630 mg/Kg
P: Total as P 665 MEN
PO4
ApSilver 46566 m
Al -Aluminum 465S7 mg/Kg
As•Arsenic 46551 ID
Ba-Barium 465S8 mg/Kg
Ca -Calcium 46552 m
Cd-Cadiam 46559 mg/Kg
Cr4Chmmium 46560
Co- Copper 1042 1719/4
Fa Iron 1045 ELM
Hg. Memory 71900mg/Kg
K-Porassinm 46555 mg/Kg
Mg- Mapesium 927 m
Mn-Manpriese 1055 mvxg
Na- Sodium 929 mg/Kg
Ni-Nickel
Pb-Lead 46564
SeSeleninm
Z�7�nc 46567 nWKg
Lab Number
YGO122
Date Received :
2/1712000
Time Received :
9;00
Received By
DS
Released By :
AR
Date reported :
3121/2000 _
IX I Organochtorine Pesticides
I . I Add Herbicides I
Gasoline
YWI22)ds

PPOJPJPP
NDWATEn FIELD/LAD Fonts
County
-- ----- --- North Carolina
rDepartment of Environment, Ilenllh, and lialural Resources
+ DIVISION Or WATER QUALITY - GnOUNDWATEII SECTION
Lab Number
Dale }received
nec'cl by:__u
Other:
o111 Clral of Custody To. -OD, FnData Entry By: Clc:
WSRO, IClnslon FO, Fact. Trust, Central 011., Other: Date Reported:
Shipped by:' Bus, Col Hand Del., Olher- Purpose: J
rC�olleclor(s): p�44kc's� Dale o2/� 5-100 Time � 2 =`'{ 0 Baseline, 1C�11, Compliance LUST, Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other. (�� I
ELD-AAL— oonoi
El: L SES Owner �- ���sa C.. -I�
0I.1400 ` — Spec. Cond.9,t al 250 C Location or site Ott; c am czq'�
Temp.1e oC Odor Nfl Description of sampling point %Ar: P rnscc+�� � t�vE of HtirnAa P�ae-�"`t
Appearance -- Sampling Method Sample Interval s�tne�•�r sv.
Field Analysis By: G Remarks rP`�r�'' b��' etc.)
Uxmy9rq limo, sir lam.. plat
I ARr1FIATnAY ANAI Y.RF14
j�r�Nl:orngc I
`yj Serial NO.
Z- Long. 91/3-1/5-1
S9MPW TYPE. _s9MPl=€P.EiloM
D Water ffrRoullne
E�-soll 0 Emergency
❑ 011ler
.BOD, 110 n
D ss. Solids 70300 me /
An - Silver 46566 u2
_
-COD fllgh 340 mg/l
_
Flourlde 951 mcL
Al - Aluminum 46557 ua/l
COD Low 335 rltg/l
_
Hardness: Total Dan rP21_
As - Arsenic 46551 ug/l
_
Coillorm: MF Fecal 31610 /100►nl
_
Hardness(non-garb) 902 m2
Ba - Barium 46558 ug
_
Colilornt: MF Total 31504 / I00rnl
_
B ellois 32M urn/I
Ca - Calcium 46552 ran/I
_
"TOC 600 n1;L/i
_
SaPdllr C0n1La5 1IM11021ple
Sulfate 945 mar /l_
Cd - Cadlnitlrn 46559 t�cLJl
_
Turbldily 76 NTU
Cr�Chromlum 46560 uc�H
_
-Residue., Suspended 530 rng/l
Sulfide 745 moll
Cu -Copper 46562 Iran
_
Fo - Iron 46563 ug/l
_
Oil and Grease Inuit
_
Llg - Mercury 71900 ug/l
_
pi 1403 unit.
K - Polassium 46555 rngA
_
Alkalinity to pi 14.5 410 rngA
_
Mg - Magnesium 46554 mQ/I
_
'Alkalinity to pi 10.3 415 ing/l
_
_
_Mn - Manganese 46565 ug/l
_
Carbonate 445 mg/l
NI -I, as N 810 md/1
Na - Sodium 46556 In /I
_
Bicarbonate 440 ntgll
u(t� ae rn01L
_HL- N1rheI ugA
_
Carbon dioxide 405 mgA
_
NO, + NO as N 630 m2
Pb - Lead 46564 ugfl
_
Chloride 940 nlg/l
_
P: Total as P 665 rngA
_
. Be - Selenium Iran
_
Chromium: Ilex 1032 ug/l
_
Zn - Zinc 46567 u�
_
Color: True e0 CU
_
Cyanide 720 ntgA
_
Lab Comments:
OW-54 nEV. 7190 For Dissolved Analysis-- submil Iillored sample and write "DIS" In block .
_Time
: 8u , Courl , Hnnd Doi.,
Organochlodne Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Nitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
PCB's
_ Semivolalile Organics
TP11- Diesel Range
r 0
Volatile Organics (VOA bollle)
_ TPII - Gasoline Range
TPII - BTEX Gasoline Range
1.

ppppp�
ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
REPORTED BY CGY(Q
• CHECKED BY GB
REVIEWED BY KAK Y/ It
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL - ANALYSIS RESULTS
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON C
1597260-8
ALACHLOR
3094)0-2
ALDRIN
0.0025
U
72-20-8
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.0003
U
7421-934
319-846
BI[C-ALPHA
0.05W
U
53494-70.5
319.95-7
BI[C-BETA
0.0003
U
2593-15-9
319-86-8
BHC-DELTA
0.0003
U
76-44-8
5"9-9
BIIC-GAMMA(LINDANE)
00003
U
1024.57.3
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
0.0003
U
118-74.1
5103.71-9
CHLORDANE -ALPHA
0.0300
U
121-75.5
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.0003'
U
7243.5
3734-48-3
CHLORDENE
0.0005
U
2385.85-5
2675-776
CHLORNEB
04
U
39765-80.5
501-156
CHLOROBENZILATE
0.0033
U
2698048-8
2921.98-2
CIiLORPYRIFOS
0.0100
U
52645-53-1
1897.456
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.0008
0.0029
1918-16-7
1961-32-1
DCPA
0.0004
U
117-IM
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.0004
U
1592.09-8
72-54.8
DDD, PP
0.0008
U
12674-11-2
3424.826
DDE, OP
0.00030.0007
U
11104-2&2
72.55.9
DDE, PP
U
11141-16-5
789-026
DDT, OP _
0.0003
U
53469-21-9
50-29.3
DDT, PP
0.0005
U
12672-296
60-57-1
DIELDRIN
0.0003
U
1109769-1
959-9&8
ENDOSULFAN I
0.0003
U
11096-92-5
33213.65-9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.0003
0.0143
37324-23-5
103I-01-8
ENDOSULFANSULFA7'E
o.WO3
0.0439
HOOT-35-2
0.0003
0.0889
ENDRIN
ENDRIN ANDEHYDE
ENDRIN KETONE
ETHAZ.OLE
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
MALATHION
METHOXYCIILOR, PP
MIREX
TRANS-NONACHLOR
OXYCHLORDANE
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
PROPACHLOR
TECNAZENE
TRIFLURALIN
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCHLOR 1221
AROCHLOR 1232
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCHLOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
TOXAPHENE
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
:::::........ ..
505944"
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
25057-89.0
BENTAZON
0.003
N
120-36-5
133-90�
CHLORAMBEN
0027
.
N
8&85-7
94-75-7
2,4-D
0 007
N
7600-50-2
94-826
2,4 DB
0.013
N
100-02.7
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
0.027
N
87-86 5
1918-00-9
DICAMBA
0.003
N
1918-02-1
51-36-5
3.5 DICIILOROBENZOIC ACID
O.Q03
N
93-7&5
0.020
N
93-72-1
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS utTECTED
LAB NO. YGO122
SUPERVISOR ' ��r�
DATE
ENTERED BY
DATF
0.0003
U
0.0003
U
0.0005
U
0.0010
U
MOM
U
0.0003
U
0.0003
U
0.0033
U
0.0017
U
0.0005
U
0.0003
U
0.0008
U
0.0200
U
0.0050
U
0.0002
U
0.0006
U
0.0290
U
0.0730
U
0.0730
U
0.0270
U
0.0570
U
0.0500
U
0.0470
U
0.0500
U
0.0500
u
>10
DICHLORPROP
DINOSEH
0.020 N
0.007 N
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
0.003 N
4-NCTROPHENOL
0.110
PENTACIILOROPHENOL(PCP)
N
0002 N
PICLORAM
0.007
2,4,5-T
N
0.003 N
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
0.003
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
N

P PP
, ppp�
PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
LAB # YGO122
78&19-6
CARBOPHENOTHION
0.027
U
55-38-9
.....
FENTHION
0.013
U
2921.8&2
CHLORPYRIFOS
0.013
115-90.2
FENSULFOTHION
0.161
U
78-4&8
DEF
0.013
U
150-50-5
FOLEX(MERPHOS,TRIBUPHOS)
0.670
U
299-03-3.
DEMEi•ON
0.027
U
6923-224
MEVINPHOS
0.013
U
333.41-5
DIAZINON
0.013
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
0.027
U
62-73.7
DICHLORVOS
0.013
U
56-38-2
NALED
0.027
U
60-51-5
DIMETHOATE
0.013
U
298-00-0
FTHYL PARATHION
0.013
U
298-04.4
DISULFOTON
0.027
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
0.013
U
2497416-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
0.013
U
299.84-3
PHORATE
0.013
U
2497-07-6
DISULFOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.013
U
21D4-04-5
EPN
0.013
U
13071-74.9
SULFOTEPP
0.013
U
563 t2-2
ETI110N
0.013
U
7786-34.7
TERBUFOS
0.013
U
13194.484
ETIIOPROP
0.013
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
3
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP
DETECTION
.....................................XE&[IeI>?E..................
................:::::::::.:.:...................................,:.::..:::..:.,.......:
:::..::::::::::::::::
:::::::. .:...................
::::.::::::.;;.:;;-;:-:;:;:;;.;;.;;:::::::::::::>::;:;:;;::•;:•;:;:.;:;:<;:::;•;::;:::::::............:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:....:.............:::.:::::..:::::::::•.:::::
..
•...::.::::._. I .......
:;;:-;:-;:;.:;;-;:•:•;;::;.;;..::::::..
::::::::::::::::
................
CAS#:::::::::......:::.Rl3Si
::::..;..:::::::::::::,:::;;:;;:-;:;;:-;;;:•;:;:-;:::.:::.;::
t✓"3AE:................................................
-. -
..... ::. ::::::::::.::
::::::::.T
_..
:;
MailttL3t
:::::.:.........
.:;:-;;;;:.::.;;:•;;:::-;:<;:;<.;:;;;:.;:.;
•;::-;:-:;;<.::.:•:;.;::-;:-;;:;.:-;TJtRE3Ef;C�3�ifPEi.:::.•::::::::.;,::::•;:;:.;:i�tl:
:::::::.::-::•:-;:;::.;
. ............J3ETEC1EFi
...: ::::::::::::•::.:::-
;:;:;::;:<•;:;•:;::;:.:�v1L3:
... .
.. • : :,:.:;;;:
:::,.:.::..
15972.604
ALACIILOR
0.170
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
0.170
N
934-12-8
AMETRYN
0.050
N
113494
MGK264
0.670
N
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.050
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
0.050
N
31440-9
BROMACIL
0.330
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
0.330
N
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
0.330
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
0.170
N
200841-5
BUTYLATE
0.050
N
I114-71.2
PEBULATE
0.050
N
5234-68-5
CARBOXIN
0.330
N
1610-18-0
PROMETON
0.050
N
101.21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
0.170
N
7287.19-6
PROMETRYN
0.050
N
2921-88-2
CliLORPYRIFOS
0.920
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
0.170
N
2172546-2
CYANAZINE
0.080
N
13940.2
PROPAZINE
0.050
N
1134.23.2
CYCLOATE
0.050
N
122-34-9
STMAZINE
0.050
N
33341-5
DIAZINON
0.020
N
1014.70-6
SIMETRYN
0.050
N
957-51-7
DIPHENAMID
0.170
N
34014-19.1
TEBUTHIURON
0.170
N
759.94-4
EPTC(EPTAM)
0.050
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
0.670
N
22224-92-6
FENAMIPHOS
0.170
N
7786-34-7
TERBUFOS
0.020
N
51235-04-2
HEXAZINONE
0.170
N
886-SM
TERBUTRYN
0.050
N
51219 45-2
METOLACHLOR
0.330
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
0.050
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit. Subject to N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
change due to instrument sensitivity D- Detected below quantitation limit
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed NE- No established TQL
E- Estimated Value
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS: •CHLORPYRIFOS SEEN ON FPD, CONFIRMED AND QUANTITATED ON ECD

-DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chesnistry Laboratory Report / Ground Water Quality
COUNTY." --BUNCOMBE
;SAMPLE PRIORITY
-.QUAD NO:
X❑ROUTINE ❑EMERGENCY
. REPORTTO .: =ARO Regional Office
X❑
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
"COLLECTOR(S) : DAVIDSON
DATE: ]l13fZ444
'TARE:
SD
SAMPLE TYPE
`PURPOSE: Owner.
C CLoitSE c2
'-LABORATORY ANALYSIS
BOD 310 -,m .K
COD ' '340 nWKg
:COD Low335`
Cofiform- MF Fecal 31616
Coliform: NY Total31504
TOC mg/Kg
Turbitity NTU
Residue.. Suspended 530 uVKg
Total Suspended solids mg/Kg
H units
Ano nity to pH4.5 mg/Kg
Allatlinity to pH.8.3 mg/Kg
Carbonate mg/Kg
i
Bicarbonate mg/Kg
Carbon dioxide mg/Kg
Chloride mg/Kg
Chromium: Hex 1032 u
Color: True 80 c.u.
Cyanide 720 m K
COMMENTS:
`MAR 2 42000 -
J
_Ashevf�te � ocU�3
Location orSite:
Desorption of sampling point
Sampling Method:
Remarks:
Diu. Solids 70300 mg/Kg
Fluoride 951
Hardness: total900
Hardness: non-mrb 902 m
Phenols 32730 u
ISPecific Cond.95 umhos/cm2
Suffate
Sulfide 745
WAS
Oil and Grease
Silica
Boron
,Formaldehyde m L
NH3 as N 610 m
TKN as N 625
NO2 +NO3 as n 630 K
P. Total as P 665
PO4 mg/Kg
Siivei46566
Al-Alumimmn 46557 MgAKg
As -Anemic 46551 mg/Kg
Ba-Barium 46558
Ca -Calcium 46552
Cd-Cadium 46559 mg/Kg
Cr{3tromium 46560
Cu- CxWer 1042 mg/Kg
Fe- Iron 1045 mg/Kg
H Mercury 71900 1119/4
K-Potassium 46555 mg/Kg
Mg- IvIggoesiont 927 m
Mn-Manganese 1055 mg/Kg
Na- Sodium 929
Ni-Nickel 1118/4
Pb-Lead 46564
Se•Seleniam
7�2inc 46567 mg/Kg
Lab Number
YGO123
'Date Received :
327/2000
Time Received :
9;00
Received By
DS
Released By:
AR
Date reported:
3212000
I I Add Herbicides I

INA'fCR 1"IEl D/LAR:`FOnMHAI.
r
oitn t3urJcvrl�tSc ! SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE PBIoEiFU
(auad,' 'Seilal No. [�.Waler Routine
I:ril. -511s (2-1- `Long. 17 f3-1 1S•:1 :�-soll El Emergency
[] �olher
Other:
neporl To:;.0UP, 'Fno,:Mno, nno, Wano, Wino, Chain of Cuslorty Data Entry By: Clc
WSnO, I(Inslon FO,"Fed. Trusl, Central Off., Olher: �IuDale Reported:
Shipped by: -Bus, 04a r r,'I-land Del., Olher-
Purpose:
Collector(s): 9AuOSc.-� Dale p2/15("0 Time rZ =Sb Baseline, Cq!�no7a nl, Cqg�lco LUST Pesticide Study, Federal Trust, Other.
L'IE_ NL�LUSES Owner C ..C"U'sa CS —tip 'rl """1'
North Carolina
nepariment of Environment, I len1111,,nnd Nalural fnosourcee
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY- nnOUNDWATEII'SECTION
Lab Number QI
Dale necely d T
need by: From: Bu land Dal.
P1-1400 Spec. Cond'04 _ r at 250 C Locallon or site Rtl coLAN j cat- :KO P sgey,"c r'L- 1-M&G
,Temp�1e °C Odor ►JD Description of sampling point fit, Rc{gA'L� P►fE
Appearance .Sampling Melhod 5rrW-`J- Pogo AsCw Va LLS I-ONT Sarnple Interval
'FleldAnalysls By:.. -F'_0 nernarks -(b LAK,,rAjL.,?0 ► 'P0 02401.a".r
'UUU4 a310
COD411911:340
:COD Low 335
Coillorin:`MF Fecal 31e1e
Co111onn: MF Tolal 31504
TOC 680
_ Turbidily 76
residue., 'Suspended 530
/I
rng/l
Alkelhifly-lo pl i 4:5 410
rng/l
Allralfnlly to p1-1:0:3 .415
111971
40erbonale 445
mgn
Biearbonale 440
mall
Carbon -dioxide 405
rnnq'
Chromium: Flex 1032 -un/l
720
.ab Comments:
IW-54 'nEV. 7190.
Oil and Grease
1_1 NI -I, as N wo ["an I
_( P: Total as P sm rn2
For Dissolved Analysis - submil 1111ered sample and write "DIS" In block
Arl - Silver 46568
112
At - Alurninum,16557
IrcdA
As - Arsenic 46551
tgo
Ba - Barium 46556
u2
Ca - Calcium 46552
mc�/
Cd - Cadgllurr146559
Cr - Chrernlum 46560
ulL/l
uglt
Cu - Copper-46562
uc,�/I
Fe - 1101146563
t10
I Ig - Mercury 71900
ugn
K - Polassitun 46555
mnA
mu - mbEneslum 4000g
Mot
Mn=Mancdanese-46565
ugn
Na - Sodium 46556
md/l
_HL- Nickel
t11J/L
PI) - Lead 46564
uc�n
Se --Selenium
ug
7n - 76ir ARLR7
-A
x Organochlorine Pesticides
cL Organophosphorus Pesticides
_ Nilrogeli Pesticides
_ Acid Herbicides
PCB's
Semivolelile Organics
'c L I TPl I - Diesel flange
_ Volatile Organics (VOA bottle)
_ TPH - oasotine'nancue
TPI I - BTEX Gasolim nanne
C

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT LAB N0. p YG0123
rREPORTED
BY CG SUPERVISOR L KCKED BY -GB 'DATE
%REVIEWED BY KAK
ENTERED BY
SAMPLE TYPE: -SOIL ANALYSIS RESULTS DATE
.........:. ...
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES.BY"ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
' v-:\:+-i. h {•. :.:::.:.......rr.:v:::::::::: ..... iii}ii?}. .............. . ix:.v: -..... .v...v... ".iY ii:............;.. .
{:::8.v...n.n.::C.....:•:i{.i:;v...............sti;.,...r:::::v::v,{•i:6i'ni�:::::::::::::: ii:.... ..: �: :w::::-: -r.� 4n xr.... � .. {. v:::.,:•:nv.:.
.............
........... :......... tr, ............:.:::.i':::::; 4;::}...... L:{{: {{+•i:: •: ii 4:::.v._ v::: w::: }.v �i; }. • :::•:::{:::.:.v:•i':�:::(itiry}}:•iii:9ii:}{:^: i:4:•}:i'i:{-: � i:v4i::i•i:{-iiiitiiY.:t:�. ':.: :...::::..:::::::::::::: r.•:.:::.vyy��y....::....
................ ....l�A1JfiJ:•�)Yif.Ji::':::sy::;:;:::;:)i.`ii:.is:j::;:;:::::3:;:j<j:•:iPiSfl.• ., ..v: iiiv}:•v.-i: ':i'r::�
159726M . ALACHLOR 0.0025 U 72-20-8
ALDRIN 0.0003 U
30941Q 2 0.0W3 U 7421-93-4 ENDRIN ANDEHYDE 0.0Q03 U
1912-24-9 ATRAZINE 0.0500 U 53494-70.5
319414.E BHC-ALPHA ETHAZ ICEIONE 0.0010 U
0.0003 U 7644- S 9 ETHAZOLE 0.0010 U
319-85-7 BHC-BETA 0.0003 U 76-09-8
319-B6.8 BHC-DELTA HEPTACHLOR 0.0003 U
0.0003 U 1Q24-5i= - XIDE 0.0003
S BHC-GAMMA(LINDANE) 0.0003 U
U II8-74-1 HEXACHLOROBENZENE 0.0003 U
57-74-9 CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL 0.0300
I21-75.5 MALATHION
:5103-71.9 CHLORDANE -ALPHA 0.0009 0.00U
U 2243-5 METHOXYCHLOR, PP 0.001717 U
5103.74.2 CHLORDANE -GAMMA 0.0005 U 2385-85-5
MIREX OOWS U
373448-3 CFILORDENE 0.0004 U 39765 80 5 TRANS-NONACHLOR 2675-77.6 CHLORNEB 0.0003 U
0.0033 U 26880-48-8 OXYCHLORDANE p 0008 501-15.6 CHLOROBENZILATE 0.0100 U
U 52645-53.1 MIXED-PERMETHRIN 0.0200 U
2921-88.2 CHLORPYRIFOS 0.0008 U 1919-16-7 PROPACHLOR-1897.45-6 CHLOROTHALONIL p•pppq 0.0002 U
1861.32-I DCPA 0.0004 U 117-15-0 TECNAZENE 0.0002 U
186 -3 DDD, OP 1582-OM TRIFLURALIN 0.000E
72-19-0 DDD, PP 0.0008 U 12674.1I-2 AROCHLOR 1016 0.0290 U
3424482E DDD, OP 0.0W3 U 11104-28-2 AROCHLOR 1221 0.0730 U
3424-9 DDE,PP 0.0007 U 11141-16-5 AROCHLOR1232 0.0730 U
789-026 DDT, OP O.W03 U 53469-21-9 AROCHLOR 1242 0.0270 U
789-0 3 DDT, PP O.OW5 U 12672-29-6 AROCHLOR 1248 0.0570 U
60-57-1 DIELDRIN 0.0W3 U 1109769-! AROCHLOR 1254 0.0sw U
O.OW3 U
U I1096-82-5 AROCHLOR 1260 0.0470 U
959-m ENDOSULFAN 1 0.0003 U 37324-23.5 AROCHLOR 1262
33213-65-9 ENDOSULFAN 11 0.0500 U
0.0003 0.0022 8M1-35-2 TOXAPHENE 0.0500 U
1031-07-8 ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 0.003 0.0071 UNIDENTIFIED. PEAKS DETECTED >10
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
50594666
25057-89-0
133-90-4
94-75.7
94-826
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
BENTAZON
CHLORAMBEN
2,4-D
2A-DB
0.003
0.027
0.007
0.013
0.027
N
N
N
N
N
120.36-5
88.85-7
7600.50-2
100-02-7
97-86-5
19184)0-9
51-36.5
DCPA (ACID METABOLITES)
DICAMBA
3.5 DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID
0.003
0.003
0.020
N
N
N
1918-02-1
93-76.5
93-72-1
DICHLORPROP
0.020 N
DINOSEB
0.007 N
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
0.003 N
4-NITROPHENOL
0.110 N
PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP)
0.002 N
PICLORAM
0.007 N
2,4,5-T
0.003 N
2,4,5-TP (SH.VEX)
0.003 N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
:ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
::;+6i:: •:: �n :.:., .. .•... .n.aa... ...v .... \n.... Yri•. �:::: ;.; ..... n. .. ..; y;:::::i: G:: {::.}': n•::::'.. ...�:.::.��;
LAB # YGO123
78619fi
CARBOPHENOTFitON
0.027
......:.:::.._ :•:::::
:.....
U
;+.:i;: i::.......--A.:::;•iii:•?iiX'::,li.9i41.}.1kI:'.l:'hJ{fG!"%'I.CEi'.%�
;iiiii:;oi:'<}:Si:?i%i:t,'.?:;:ir :4:::?:•i:;fi:
17...::::.:•::::::.••::::......,f..;v.;::.;:n3if.013
..:..: ......,..,
's:;s::•.':::;:ti%:;iii:;i:%s:1ciC3flCp:::::'<%'rU
...: ....�.....
-2921418-2
CIH.ORPYRIFOS
0.013
55-38.9
FENTFIION
p 013
U
��
DEF
U
115-90.2
FENSULFOTHION
0.161
U
.299-03.3
DEMETON
0.013
U
150.50.5
FOLEX( MERPHOS,TRIBUPHOS)
0.670
U
3334I.5
DIAZINON
0.027
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
0.017
U
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
0.013
U
300.76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
0.027
U
60-51-5
D)METHOATE
0.013
U
56-38-2
NALED
0.027
U
24
DISULFOTON
0.013
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.013
U
2497.06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
0.027
U
298-02-2
METHYL PARATHION
0.013
U
2497-07.6
DISULFOTON SULFOXmE
O.Ol3
NE
U
299 84 3
PRORATE
0.013
U
2101.64-5
EPN
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
0.013
U
'S63-I2-2
ETHION
0.013
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.013
U
I3I94-08-0
ETHOPROP
nA13
•
7786•
Up
0.013
U
0.013
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
I
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972.60-8
`834.12.8
31440-.9
314-00.9
23184-66-9
200841
-5
101-21.3
2921-88-2
21725.46-2
1134.23-2
33341.5
957-51-7
759.944
22224-92-6
51235-04-2
512I845.2
ALACHLOR
AMETRYN
ATRAZINE
.BROMACIL
BUTACHLOR
BU g X�
CHLORPROPHAM
CIILORPYRIFOS
CYANAZINE
CYCLOATE
DIAZINON
DIPHENAMID
EPTC(EPTAM)
FENAMIPHOS
HEXAZINONE
METOLACHLOR
0.170
0.050
0.050
0.330
0.330
0.050
0.330
0.170
0.020
0.080
0.050
0.020
0.170
0.050
0.170
O.I70
0.330
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
21087d4.9
I13-08-0
2212.67-1
15299-99.7
27314-I3.2
1114-71-2
16I0-IM
7287-19-6
23950.58-5
13940.2
122.34-9
1014-70-6
34014-18-1
5902-51-2
7786.34-7
886 50-0
1929-77.7
METRIBUZIN
MGK 264
MOLINATE
NAPROPAMIDE
NORFLURAZON
PEBULATE
PROMETON
PROMETRYN
PRONAMIDE
PROPAZINE
SIMAZINE
SIMETRYN
TEBUTHIURON
TERBACIL
TERBUFOS
TERBUTRYN
VERNOLATE
0.170 N
0.050 N
0.050 N
0.330 N
p, N
0.171700 N
0.050 N
0.050 N
p.170 N
0.050 N
0.050 N
0.050 N
0.170 N
0.670 N
0.020 N
0.050 N
0.050 N
TQL• Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T• Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
N• Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
COMMENTS:

MY NAME IS PATSY CLOUSE. I AM THE WIFE & SECRETARY OF CHARLES CLOUSE
OF KARS & KOLORS, INC.
ON DECEMBER 20,1999, A MAN CAME WALKING TO OUR BUSINESS & ASKED TO
SPEAK TO CHARLES CLOUSE. I TOLD HIM HE WAS NOT HERE AT THIS TIME AND
COULD I TAKE A MESSAGE. HE JUST TURNED AROUND WITHOUT SAYING ANYTHING.
THEN HE TURNED BACK AROUND AND SAID,AS A MATTER OF FACT YOU CAN GIVE
MR. CHARLES CLOUSE A MESSAGE FOR ME.(HIS FACE HAD TURNED RED. I COULD
TELL HE WAS MAD.) HE WENT ON TO SAY TO TELL CHARLES WE WANT HIM TO
BACK OFF THIS PLACE OVER HERE. (HE POINTED AT THE GREENHOUSES).WE ARE
TIRED OF HIM COMPLAINING. WE DON'T CARE IF HIS WHOLE FIELD FILLS
WITH OIL,WE HAVE DONE ALL WE ARE GOING TO DO & WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO
ANOTHER THING. HE GOT VERY LOUD AND HAD STEPED INSIDE THE FENCE OF
OUR HOUSE. AT THIS TIME OUR DOG WAS CIRCLING HIM. HE ASK IF THE DOG
WOULD BITE AND I TOLD HIM IF I ASK IT TO. HE THEN SAID, "WELL, YOU
BETTER PUT IT UP." I TOLD HIM THAT I WAS NOT GOING TO PUT MY DOG UP,
THAT HE HAD MORE RIGHT BEING HERE THAN HE DID. HE THEN WENT ON TO
SAY THAT THE NEXT TIME CHARLES CALLS ANY OF THE EVIRONMENTAL OFFICES
COMPLAINING ABOUT THIS AGAIN THAT THEY HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO CALL
THE STATE AND HAVE THEM COME HERE AND SLAP SO MANY FINES ON HIM THAT
HE WOULD HAVE TO SHUT DOWN.
HE SAID, "TELL MR. CHARLES CLOUSE TO CONSIDER HIMSELF WELL WARNED
AND NOT TO CALL MAX OR LIZ'S OFFICE AGAIN. SHE THINKS HE IS A TOTAL
IDIOT".
I SAID NOW THAT YOU HAVE HAD YOUR SAY I WANT YOUR NAME AND SOME
KIND OF ID. HE TOLD ME THAT HE DID NOT HAVE TO GIVE ME HIS NAME OR
SHOW ME ANYTHING, THAT THE LAW AND STATE PROTECTS THEM.
I SAID BULL.... YOU COME ON TO OUR PROPERTY THREATENING US & YOU
WONT SHOW ME ANY ID. I TOLD HIM WE WOULD JUST SEE ABOUT THAT. AS I
TURNED AROUND TO GET THE PHONE,HE STARTED RUNNING UP THE DRIVEWAY.I
YELLED AT HIM TO STOP. THAT WAS WHEN I RELIZED THERE WAS A VEHICLE
PARKED AT THE TOP OF THE DRIVEWAY. AS HE GOT IN, HE SAID, "GO, GO"
TO THE DRIVER. I CAN IDENTIFY THE PERSON & THE VEHICLE.
ON MONDAYS, KARS & KOLORS IS SEMI -CLOSED. THIS IS WELL KNOWN.
THIS IS THE DAY CHARLES VISITS OUR CUSTOMERS AND LINES UP WORK FOR
THE WEEK.
THIS MAN WAS VERY RUDE, WAVING HIS HANDS AND POINTING HIS FINGERS.
HE KEPT PUTTING HIS HANDS IN HIS POCKETS AS IF HE HAD SOMETHING IN
THEM. HE WAS OUT OF CONTROL. I FEARED FOR MY SAFTEY.I HONESTLY BE-
LIEVED HE WOULD HAVE HARMED ME IF I WENT NEAR HIM.
---------------------
PATSY CLOUSE

f
w NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTME T OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION,
February 2, 1999
Charles Clouse
98 Cowan Cove Road
Asheville, N.C. 28806
Subject: Results of Sample Analysis
Pond & Stream on Clouse Property
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Clouse:
Please find attached results of analysis of a water
sample collected from your pond and the stream on your
property on December 7, 1998. Both samples contained
essentially the same small concentration of Endosulfan
Sulfate. By copy of this letter, these data also are being
referred to the N.C. Department of Agriculture, Food and
Drug Protection Division for review and appropriate
response.
Should you have questions, please contact me at
telephone [phone].
'Yours/truly
,
/Hann�r
Environmental Chemist
xc: Terry Leatherwood
Roy Davis
INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

COUNTY
BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN:
REPORT TO
ARO Regional Office
Other :
COLLECTOR(S) :
HANER
Estimated BOD Range:
Seed:
Chlorinated:
Station tJ
hnm/dd)
Dal�181117
DOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Coliform: AIF Total 31504 /100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530-- - -- - - - mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540
t1e/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to p314.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mgfL
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mom,
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Qunlily
PRIORITY
AMBIENT' QA
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
Dale End (yy/mnddd)
W SAMPLE TYPE
l STREAM EFFLUENT
LAKE El INFLUENT
ESTUARY
1
Station Location: COWAN COVE CRK
Remarks:
Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBAI
1345
Value Type - A, II, L
0.1
IabNumber : $W9097
Dale Received : 12/9/98
Time Received: 10:05 AM
Received By : IIMW
Data Released AR
Dale Reported:: 1/15/99
Composile-T, S, I Sample Type
Li -Lithium 1132
ug/L
Mg- Magnesium 927
mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055
ug/L
Na- Sodium 929
mg/I
Arsenic:Total1002
ug/L
Se- Selenium 1147
ug/L
Hg- Mercury 71900
3a Barium
ug/L
ug/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Ilerbicides
Base/Neutral @Acid Extractable
rPH Diesel Ranee
Gasoline Range
BTEX Gasoline
bottle
JAN 1 9 1999

DIVISION
F ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY FIELD
-LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY
�
RIVER BAS .
PRIORITY
0
SAMPLE TYPE
I
REPORT T : ARO R MRO RRO ROW.WIRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT
❑ QA
STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT
AT BM
Other
XOMPLIANCE
❑ CHAIN
❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courier, aff, Other EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR:4S)4�LT`
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40 130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION: rr A70 �t C
.c
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station! Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End
� Z v s
1
BODS 310 mg/1
J2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /loom,
5
6
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
"'form. Tube Fecal 31615 /loom.
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
g
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
9
Volatile 505 m9/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/1
13
Fixed 540 m9/1
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 9.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/I
201
1Turbidity
76 NTU
Y
Date Recelved: Time: 0 j%
Rec'd b : From: Bus- url -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
W 57'7�3�
Time EndlDept DM DBM Value Type
IJ 2 A H L
Chloride 940 m9/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 u9/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/(
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/1
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/1
Specific Cond. 95
uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 mgn
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 m9/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I
CdCadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr-ChromiunuTotal1034 ug/l
CuCopper 1042 ug/i
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugn
Ag liver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugn
T S B
C G GNXX
LI-Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg-Magneslum 927 mgA
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphoms Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
IBase/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics I
rurgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd) I
Phytoplankton ` ---I
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature (C)
D.O. mg/.
pH
Alkalinity
pH 8.3 pH 4.5
Acidity
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
Air Temperature (C)
2
94
Salinity %
10
Precipltlon On/day)
300
Cloud Cover %
400 IN
Wind Direction (D
82244 431
Severity Stream Flow Seve
tY Turbidity Severity
82243 82242
Wind
20
Stream Width ft.
Velocity M/H Stream Depth ft.
480
45
32
36
1351 1350
35 [ean
4
4
DMI/Revlsed 10/86

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. 8W9097
REPORTED BY
KK [-etZ-
SUPERVISOR
CHECKED BY
AP Al'
DATE
REVIEWED BY
KK JLC
ANALYSIS RESULTS
`
ENTERED BY !
DATE "
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
CHLORINATED PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
15972-6M
309-00-2
1912-24-9
319-84-6
319-85-7
319-86.8
58.89-9
57-74.9
5103-71-9
5103-74,2
37.14-48-3
2675-77-6
501-I5-6
2921-88-2
1897-45-6
1861-32-I
53-19-0
72-54-8
342.1-82-6
72-55-9
789-02-6
50-29-3
60-57-1
959-98-9
33213-65-9
1031-07-8
ALACHLOR
ALDRIN
ATRAZINE
DHC-ALPIIA
BIIC-BETA
BIIC-DELTA
BIIC-GAMAIA(LINDAN17)
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
CIILORDAN&ALPIIA
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
M
CIILORDENE
CIILORNEB
CIILOROOENZILATE
CIILORPYRIFOS
CIILOROTIIALONIL
DCPA
DDD, OP
ODD, PP
DDT:. OP
DDE, PP
DDT, OP
DDT, PP
DIELDRIN
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULPAN II
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.10
0.08
0.75
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.30
002
0.03
0.02
0.03
5.00
0.08
0.03
0.02
0.06
0.M
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.02
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
11
U
U
U
U
U
U
0.018
72-20-8
7421-93-4
53494-70-5
2593-I5-9
76-44-8
IW4-57-3
IIB-74-I
121-75-5
72- 43-5
2385-RS-5
39765-80-5
26880-48-8
52645-53-I
1918-16-7
117-I8-0
1582-09-8
12674-11-2
11104-28.2
11141-I6-5
53469-2I-9
12672-29-6
I1097-69-1
11096-82-5
37324-23-5
8001-35-2
ENDRIN
ENDRIN ANDEIIYDE
ENDRIN KETONE
ETIIAZOLE
HEPTACHLOR
-
IIHPTACIILOR EPDXIDE
IIEXACH LOROUEN7_ENE
MALATI IION
METI{pXYCFILOR, PP
MIRGR
TRANS-NONACHLOR
OXYCI I LORDANE
MIXED-PERMETIiRIN
PROPACI3LOR
TECNAZENE
TRIFLURALIN _
AROCHLOR 1016
AROCIILOIT 1221
AROCHLOR 12.32
AROCHLOR 1242
AROCHLOR 1248
AROCILOR 1254
AROCHLOR 1260
AROCHLOR 1262
TOXAPHENE
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
0.03
0.05
0-04
0.03
0.02U
0.01
0.01
0.08
5
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.02
1.00
0.10
0.02
0.03
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.50
U
U
U
U0.03
11
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
2
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
..........::...............:::::....f
I f:RBIE{DE:•:::::.... :::::::::... �.. �:......::::.....
TSRU..
... �:::•.
T .L:::.......
�:.. .. .::::.:::::.:::....:.::.:..;
:............::::::.::.:::...........::::::::::::::::...........:::::::::::...............:.::::::.:::::............::::::::::::.:
.......................::..
� :.:::::::::::::::;•::�::;•::a;i"ARG�T,:;COM
:::.::::.::.:::..............:...::•::::::::::...........:::.::._::::........................
E?.OLIi`!1?:;:;;:;;;:.;:<::;?�>:�>:<�::�:�:�:�:::csi:�»;<•;:�:�::.;
...........:::::::.::.::..
� �.::>:�;5:�i:�s::;.;•;:-;:�i:�>:�;::;<�:
.
�:: -;:
50594-66-6
25057-89-0
133-90-4
94-75-7
94-82-6
1918d111-9
51-36-5
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
BENTAZON
CHLORAAIBEN
2.4-0
2A-1711
UICA AMB.\ (ACID �1ISTABOLI'P6S)
UIC
3.5 DICIII-OROBENZOIC ACID
0.50
5.00
0.50
1.60
5.00
0.36
0.35
0.50
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
120-36-5
88-85-7
7600-50-2
100-02-7
87-86-5
1918-02-1
93-76-5
93-72-1
DICHLORPROP
DINOSEB
5-HYDROXYDICAMBA
4-NITROPIIENOL
PENTACIILOROPIIENOL(PCP)
NCLORAM
2,4,5-T
2,4,5-TP (SILVEX)
8.50
0.40
2.00
4.00
0.30
I.OU
0.75
1.50
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED

PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
786-19-6
CARQOPIIENOTHION
2921-88-2
CI{LORPYRIFOS
1.0
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
78-48-8
DEF
11
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
298-03-3
_
DEMETON
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX (MERP1105, TRIBUFOS)
333-41-5
DIAZINON
2.5
U
6923-22-4
MEVINPHOS
62-73-7
DICHLORVOS
08
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
60-51-5
DIM ETHOATE
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
298-04-4
DISULFOTON
3.5
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
2497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
110
U
298-02-2
METIIYL PARATHION
ON
2497-07-6
DISIiLFOTON SULFOXIDE
U
299-84-3
PHORATE
2103-Gf-5
EPN
NE
U
3689--5
24
RONNEL
563-12-2
ETHION
4.0
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
1.32
U
7786-34"7
TERBUFOS
O
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
15972-60.8
ALACHLOR
834-12-8
AMETRYN
1912-24.9
ATRAZINE
314-40-9
BROMACIL
23184-66-9
BUTACHLOR
2008-41-5
BUTYLATE
5234-68-5
CAR13OXIN
101-21-3
CHLORPROPHAM
1134-23.2
CYCLOATE
21725-46-2
CYANAZINE
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
333-41-5
DIAZINON
957-51-7
DIPIIENAMID
759-94-4
EPTC (EPTAM)
22224-92-6
FENAMIPIIOS
51235-04-2
IIEXAZI NONE
51218-45-2
METOLACIILOR
TQL- Target Quantitation
Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
LAB # 8W9097
2.0 U
10.0 U
2.0 U
1.9 U
10.0 U
4.0 U
0.7 U
1.5 U
1.5 U
0.8 U
0.3 U
1.1 U
0
3.4
N
21087-64-9
METRIBUZIN
Ll
N
113-48-0
MGK 264
1.6
N
0.8
N
2212-67-1
MOLINATE
.1
N
3.4
N
15299-99-7
NAPROPAMIDE
2 .
N
4.8
N
27314-13-2
NORFLURAZON
2.6
N
2.2
N
1114-71-2
PEBULATE
N
6.5
N
1610-I8-0
PROM ETON
6.1
N
4.2
N
7287-19-6
PROMETRYN
2.5
2.5
N
2.4
N
23950-58-5
PRONAMIDE
N
2.5
N
139-40-2
PROPAZINE
7.4
.6
N
1.0
N
122-34-9
SIMAZINE
1.0
N
0.5
N
IOI4-70.6
SIMETRYN
1.1
N
2.8
N
34014-I8-1
TEBUTIIIURON
2.2
N
2.3
N
5902-51-2
TERBACIL
3.1
N
1.2
N
886-50-0
TERBUTRYN
4.4
N
5.7
N
1929-77-7
VERNOLATE
1.4
N
4.2
N
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
0.6
DETECTED
N
N- Sample not
analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for
this compound but not
detected

COUNTY BUNCOMBE
RIVER BASIN
REPORT TO ARO Regional Office
Other :
COLLECTOR(S) : HANER
Estimaled BOD Range:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
PRIORITY
AMBIENT QA
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
EMERGENCY
Seed: Chlorinated:
;lotion ff Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Dale End (yy/nunldd)
981207
COMMENTS:
Station Location: UT TO COWAN COVE CRK
Remarks:
Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DB, DBM
1345
W SAMPLETYPE
l STREAM
EFFLUENT
El LAKE
INFLUENT
ESTUARY
2
Value Type - A, H, L
0.1
Lab Number : 8W9098
Date Received : 1219/98
Time Received: 10:05 AM
Received By : HMW
Data Released : AR
Date Reported : 1/15/99
Composite-T, S, I Sample Type
JAI 19 I9gg u

IJIVISION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1) For Lab Use ONLY
COUNTY U Lab Number:
PRIG SAMPLE TYPE RIVER BASIA/ ) Date Received: 0 Tlme: D�
REPOR'i TO ARO F MRO RRO WeRO WIRO WSRO TS ❑ BIENT ❑ QA REAM
AT BM ❑ EFFLUENT Reed by: From: Bus- ourie -Hand Del
Other COMPLIANCE ❑CHAIN 9LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
OF CUSTODY DATA ENTRY BY: CK'
Shipped by: Bus Courle , Staff, Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(S): LS�
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes ❑ No El Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station jf% Date Be In
(yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Dep DM B DBM Value Type Composite Sample
G A H L T S B
1
BOD5 310 mg/I
2
3
COD High 340 m9/1
COD Low 335 m9/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
6
7
8
9
10
Collform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100ml
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
Volatile 505 mg/l
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/l
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
PH 403 units
15
t
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 m9 /I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
191
1
TOC 680 mg/I
20I
ITurbidity
76 NTU
Sampling Point %
2
DM1/Revlsed 16/ 66
uctance at 25 C ater Temperature (CD.O. mg D.OA pH
94 110 1300 1•
Salinity % Precipitlon (In/day) lCloud Cover %
480 145 132 136
PH 8.3
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mgn
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mgn
P: Dissolved ae P 666 mg/1
Cd-Cadmlum 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:Tota11034 u9/1
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/I
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/I
Ag Ilver 1077 ug/I
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mg/i
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugn
LI-Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg -Magnesium 927 mgn
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/I
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/I
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/I
Se-Selenlum 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Alkalinity Acidity
PH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
82244 431 82243
Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/tl
1
Air Temperature (C)
Stream Depth ILI Stream Width ft.
4

ENR/DWQ LABORATORY PESTICIDES ANALYTICAL REPORT
LAB N0.
8W 098
REPORTED BY
KK HL
SUPERVISOR
,
CHECKED BY
AP A?
DATE
REVIEWED BY
KK ,K L
ENTERED
♦
ANALYSIS RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE:
WATER
DATE
s�
���
CHLORINATED
PESTICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
�,:::::::::::::,................
CTION
:::............:.::::........:::.::::.........Q.!
.::::....
DES FG8 E7>............::.:. _:.........
.
AR
..........................
.FST
.........
...Q .....
.Rk.r.EG7 .....
15972-60-8
ALACIILOR
309-OD-2
ALDRIN
0.10
U 72-20-8
ENDRIN
0.03
U
1912-24-9
ATRAZINE
0.08
U 7421-93.4
ENDRIN ANDEIIYDE
0.04
U
319-84-6
BIIC-ALPHA
0.75
U 53494-70-5
ENDRIN KETONE
0.04
U
319-85-7
BIIC-BETA
0.02
U 2593-I5-9
ETHAZOLE
0.03
319-86-8
BIIC-DELTA
0.03
U
}IEPTACIILOR
0.02
U
58-89-9
0.03
U 1024-57-3
1024-5
PEPTACHLOR EPDXIDE
U
BIIC-GAKIAIA(LINDANE)
0.01
U
57-74-9
CHLORDANE, TECHNICAL
U II8-74-I
HEXACHLORODENZENE
0.01
0.01
U
5103-71.9
CILORDANE-ALPIIA
0.30
U 121-75-5
MALATIIION
0.05
U
5103-74-2
CHLORDANE -GAMMA
0.02
U 72-43-5
METI}OXYCHLOR, PP
0.0
U
3731.48 3
CIII-ORD@Ng
0.03
U 2385-85-5
MIRGX
0.03
U
2675-77-6
CHLORNEB
0.02
U 39765-80-5
TRANS-NONACULOR
0.02
U
501-I5-6
CHLOROBENZI LATE
0.03
U 26880-48-8
OXYCHLORDANE
0.00
U
2921-88-2
CHLORPYRIFOS
5.00
U 52645-53-I
MIXED-PERMETHRIN
1'�
U
1897-45.6
CHLOROTHALONIL
0.08
U 1918-16-7
PROPACHLOR
0. 10
U
I861-32-I
DCPA
0.03
U 117-18-0
TECNAZENE
002
53-19-0
DDD, OP
0.02
U 1582-09-8
TRIFLURALIN
0.03
U
U
72-54-R
DDD, PP
0.06
U 12674-11-2
AROCHLOR 1016
0.50
U
3424-82-6
DDE. OP
0.04
U 11104-28-2
AROCHLOR 1221
0.50
U
72-55-9
DDE• PI'
0.05
U II141-16-5
AROCHLOR 1232
0.50
U
789-02-6
DDT. OP
0.02
U 53469-2I-9
AROCHLOR 1242
0.50
U
50-29-3
DDT. PP
0.04
U 12672-29-6
AROCHLOR 1248
0'50
U
60-57-I
DIELDRIN
0.06
U 11097-69-I
AROCHLOR 1254
0.50
U
959-98-9
ENDOSULFAN I
0.02
U 11096-82-5
AROCHLOR 1260
0.50
U
33213-65.9
ENDOSULFAN II
0.03
U 37324-23-5
AROCHLOR 1262
0.50
U
1031-07-8
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.01
U 8001-35-2
TOXAPHENE
1.50
U
0.02
0.017
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
3
............., .
ACID HERBICIDES BY ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTION
.
z>;:;.;,�::<;;;;:;C,xs?k.::::.�:.;,IIGRBIE.kDE;::;.;;;>;:�;:.;::;:�:;>;;;;:.;:::::::;::.:�::::::.
�:::.:::;�:,::::::<:cs>s»':a:c;::::.<�asss::
� sssssr:;.::: a:a:<assso-;>;:.: �::::.::::::.::::•:::;::..f..........
�. ::::•::..�
. ........:::::.�:.:�:::::;:::::::::::::.�.:�::.��::.:�:.�:::.�::::::::..................
DIA:B �:.. .............:...........
�::.: �::.::.:�,::::>��.::o'•::�:;::.:;��:.;TARf:.k'1:�L0,111'Elt1'
...:•::�:.:.�s•.,:.s:o:;.::�>:o�.s:;•:��•s:.s'•.;:;::'�::�;�::;;;;:;s:-:::;:::is�:c:is�s:;�:�i:�;:::�:;�;;::::':•::�ss::.s:�>s::�;:._,.s:;•>:s:�s:.ss:-s:::.;:o:�ss:•s:�;:.s:�ssss:�s:s:�ss:�:.ss:�s:•::�ss::.;:s:o;;;s;;•s:�s;:•:......Q.
....:.:...:.:.....
.................
............ ................. ..............
.................
.EII �:::�:.
2G:7.ED....
...8..................6IL,.:::::::.:�:::::::.:�:�>:.>:�>:;:.>:<.;:.::-:i�%:�ss>:•;:�::::�::�::�:;TiS
:... . �.:s•.:;�>::s:.;,.;�::>s::•s:�:�s>:�>:•>:.;;�:::�>:�>:�:;�:;�:�:a::c;.s•:;s:�s:;•ss:�s:•:�;
�:.::�>:.;:.:::
50594-66-6
ACIFLUORFEN (BLAZER)
0.50
25057-89-0
BENTAZON
ry 120.36-5
DICK LORPROP
8.50
N
133-90-4
CIILORAt,18EN
5.00
N 88 85 7
DINOSEB
0.40
ry -
94-75-7
2.4-D
0.50
N 7600-50-2
5-11YDROXYDICAMBA
2,(8)
94-82-6
2,4-DB
1.0)
N 100-02-7
4-NITROPHENOL
4.00
N
5.00
N 87-86-5
PENTACIILOROPIIENOL (PCP)
ry
DCPA (ACID ML- IABOLITES)
0.3G
N
.
030
N
1918-IX)-9
DICAAIBA
1918-02-1
PICLOPAM
00
L75
N
51-36-5
3.5 DICI I LOROBENZOIC ACID
0.35
0.50
N 93-76-5
2,4,5- T
N
N 93-72-I
2.4, 5-TP (SILVEX)
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
1.50
.50
IN

PESTICIDES REPORT - DWQ LAB PAGE 2
ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES BY FLAME PHOTOMETRIC DETECTION
LAB # 8W9098
-1 -6
CARBOPIIENOTHION
1.0
---_._
..............._...:.::::::.:::::.�...,.v,:.,.:,;.,,.,,:.....-.,.»:>s:i<>;:;:;::;:>:<;>a>i>E>E>.»:<:u
..+.......................:•::.4
11.
2921-88-2
CIILORPYRIFOS
U
55-38-9
FENTHION
2.0
U
78-48-8
DEF
I I
U
115-90-2
FENSULFOTHION
10.0
U
298-03-3
DEb1ETON
2.5
U
150-50-5
FOLEX (AIERPHOS. TRIBUFOS)
2_p
U
333-41-5
UTAZINON
2.5
U
6923-224
MEVINPIIOS
I.9
U
G2-73-7
DICHLORVOS
0.8
U
300-76-5
MONOCROTOPHOS
10.0
U
2.1
U
56-38-2
NALED
60-5I-5
DIMETHOATE
3.5
4.0
U
29R-O7-4
DISULFOTON
U
298-00-0
ETHYL PARATHION
0.7
U
497-06-5
DISULFOTON SULFONE
1.0
U
298-02-2
MEr11VL PARATHION
1.5
ll
2.3
U
299-84-3
P110RATE
2497-07-6
DISULPOTON SULFOXIDE
NE
I.5
U
U
3689-24-5
RONNEL
21W-GI-5
EPN
4.0
0.8
U
.-12-2
ETIIION
U
13071-74-9
SULFOTEPP
0.3
U
13194-48-4
ETHOPROP
1.3
U
7786-34-7
TERBUPOS
II
U
2.0
U
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED
p
NITROGEN PESTICIDES BY NP DETECTION
15972-60-8
834-12-8
1912-24-9
314-40-9
23184-66-9
2008-41-5
5234-68-5
101-21-3
1134-23-2
21725-46-2
2921-88-2
333-41-5
957-51-7
759-94-4
22224-92.6
51235-01-2
51218-45-2
ALACIILOR
AMETRYN
ATRAZINE
BROMACIL
BUTACHLOR
BUTYLATE
CARBOXIN
CHLORPROPHAM
CYCLOATE
CYANAZINE
CHLORPYRIFOS
DIAZINON
DIPHENAMID
EPTC (EPTA[d)
FENAMIP110S
IIEXAZINONE
METOLACHLOR
3.4
1.1
0.8
3.4
4.8
2.2
6.5
4.2
2.4
2.5
1.0
0.5
2.8
2.3
1.2
5.7
4.2
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
21087-64-9
11348-4MGK
2212-67-1
15299-99-7
27314-13-2
1114-71-2
I610-I8-0
7287-19-6
23950-58-5
139-40-2
122-34-9
1014-70-6
34014-I8-I
5902-51-2
886-50-0
1929-77-7
M ETRIBUZIN
264
MOLINATE
NAPROPAMIDE
NORFLURAZON
PEBULATE
PROMETON
PROMETRYN
PRONAMIDE
PROPAZINE
SIMAZINE
SIMEFRYN
TEBUTHIl1RON
TERBACIL
TERBUTRYN
VERNOLATE
UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS
1.6
5.7
2.1
P6
71
6.7
2.5
24
76
I.0
1.1
2.23. I
qq
1.4
0.6
DETECTED
TQL- Target Quantitation Limit- Subject to
change due to instrument sensitivity
T- Tentatively Identified, not confirmed
E- Estimated Value
COMMENTS:
N- Sample not analyzed for this compound
D- Detected below quantitation limit
NE- No established TQL
U- Samples analyzed for this Compound but not detected
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MR. CHARLES MUSGROVE
POST OFFICE BOX 6618
ASHEVILLE, NC 28816
Dear Mr. Musgrove:
'A
1••
NCDENR:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 27, 2000
a
SUBJECT: PAYMENT A E L:EDGEMEN'
CIVIL PETY ASSESSMENT
HYMAN YOUNG GREENHOUSES,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
PERMIT NO:
DV 00-053
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check No. 68411 in the amount of $4,427.46 received from
you dated September 27, 2000. This payment satisfies in full the civil assessment levied against
the subject facility and this case has been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way precludes future
action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes, Regulations or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Rob Lang at [phone].
Sincerely,
E. Shannon Langley, Supervisor
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Cc: Enforcement File #: DV 00-053
ARO Regional=Office=Supervisor.
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
JAMES B. HUNT JR
GOVERNOR
September 18, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Z 158 524 124
BILL HOLMAN Charles Musgrove
SECRETARY Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
P.O. Box 6618
Asheville, North Carolina 28816
KERR T. STEVENS
DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
N.C. General Statute(s) 143-215.1 (a) (1)
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
Buncombe County
File No. DV 00-053
Dear Mr. Musgrove:
;`j
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Hyman Young
Greenhouses, Inc. in the amount of $4,427.46, including $427.46 in enforcement
costs.
Attached is a copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty. This
action was taken under the authority vested in me pursuant to delegation provided by
the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Any
continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action, including an
additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the
following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action
for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
or
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617
website: h2o.enr. state. nc. us PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10q POST -CONSUMER PAPER

ithin thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty: '
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will not
foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
or
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request.
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness of
the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by
a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached
waiver and stipulation form and a detailed statement that you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission must be
submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will review the
information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and inform you of his decision
in the matter of the remission request. His response will provide details regarding case
status, directions for payment and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions.
Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of
the original remission request considered by the Director and therefore, it is very

important that you prepar a complete and thorough statement in support of your request
for remission.
or
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the Office of
Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. You must:
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan McLawhorn
General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days as evidenced by a date stamp (not
a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred to the
Attorney General's office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty. Please be advised
that additional assessments may be levied for future violations that occur after the review period of this
assessment.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Rob Lang at
[phone], ext. 361.
Sincerely,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
11-14?,-00
Date
Attachment
cc: Asheville- Region WQ Supervisor _w/ attachment -
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit w/ attachment
Central Files w/ attachment

'E OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF
HYMAN YOUNG GREENHOUSES, INC.
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO
THE WATERS OF THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA WITHOUT
A PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-053
FINDINGS AND DECISION.
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to the delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens,
Director of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. is a legal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. is located adjacent to Cowan
Cove Road (NCSR 1324), northwest of Asheville in Buncombe
County, North Carolina. Smith Mill Creek, a Class C stream in
the French Broad River basin, crosses the property.
C. On March 16, 2000, staff of DWQ's Asheville Regional Office
observed a discharge of liquid fertilizer treated with a blue
indicator dye into Smith Mill Creek resulting from a spill at
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. The spill occurred during an
operation to mix liquid fertilizer with a blue indicator dye
prior to application to the plants. It originated inside the
mixing room (building) and drained from the building into an
outside piping system, which transported the spilled material
to the stream.
D. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. do not have a permit for the
above described activities.
E. The cost to the State of the investigation and enforcement
procedures in this matter totaled $427.46.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. is a "person" within the meaning
of G.S.143-215.6A, pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).

Smith Mill Creek constitutes waters of the State within the
meaning of G.S.143-215.1(a)(1), pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
The discharge cited in Findings of Fact I.C. constituted
making an outlet to the waters of the State, an activity for
which a permit is required by G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1).
D. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., violated G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1)
by making the above cited outlet to the waters of the State
without having first secured a permit for this activity.
E. Hyman Young Greenhouses,. Inc. may be assessed civil penalties
in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five
thousand dollars per violation may be assessed against a
person who is required, but fails to apply for or to secure a
permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed
against Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
G. The Director of the Division of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided by Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, has the authority to assess
civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make
the following:
III. DECISION•
Accordingly, Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. is assessed a civil
penalty of:
For I of one (1) violation of
G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1) by making an outlet
to the waters of the State without having
(� first secured a permit for this activity.
$ T O 0 0 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is 40 %
percent of the maximum penalty authorized
by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 427.46 Enforcement costs
$ `� . to 21 . XA (o TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of
the penalty, I have considered the factors listed in
G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

NORTH CAROL;i'. '°` �'AF n'�/IENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATUi A,— :.:_;:SOURCES
NC®ENR
JAMEs�b. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONA OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 5, 2000
MEMORANDUM
Coleen Sullins, Chief
Water Quality Section
Forrest R. Westa
Water Quality Regi rvisor
Max L. Haner
Environmental Chemist
Enforcement Action
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
Discharging Without a Permit
Buncombe County
INTRODUCTION:
DWQ staff from the Groundwater Section observed a discharge
of liquid fertilizer treated with a blue indicator dye in
Smith Mill Creek from Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., on
March 16, 2000. Groundwater's report and pictures state
that the discharge resulted from a spill in the fertilizer
:mixing room (building) which flowed to the outside of that
building, into a piping system and into Smith Mill Creek.
The pictures show that the liquid fertilizer was present in
the stream. The incident was brought to DWQ attention by a
..,downstream property owner (Charles Clouse); who has had a
,,.:;:longstanding dispute with the Greenhouse relating to trash,
,4 debris, poor housekeepping, pesticide spills (assessed by
=Dept of Agriculture, Pesticide Division), and overall
k4 impact to his property.
ad. A letter advising Hyman Young Greenhouses of our intent to
Mile enforcement recommendations for this incident was sent
on May 12, 2000, with request to respond within 10 days of
mitigating circumstances or other considerations relative
;Ir 0 to these recommendations. No response from Hyman Young
'Greenhouses, Inc., has been received regarding this
request..
?` >: INTERCHANGE BUILDING, 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
„ . ,• - PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

CONCLUSION:
The discharge of spilled liquid fertilizer came from the
mixing room at Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., with
noticable presence in Smith Mill Creek (thanks to the blue
indicator dye). Hyman Young has made no attempt to explain
this discharge other than calling it a spill .during
fertilizer mixing operations.
RECOMMENDATION:
i
i
It is recommended the appropriate enforcement action be
taken against Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., for
discharging waste material to North Carolina surface waters
without a in violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)
Enclosure

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
! ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
i
COUNTY OF Buncombe
I
File No.
IN THE MATTER OF )
HYMAN YOUNG GREENHOUSES, INC. )
FOR DISCHARGE OF A ) FINDINGS AND DECISION
j WASTE TO NORTH CAROLINA ) AND ASSESSMENT OF
SURFACE WATERS ) CIVIL PENALTIES
WITHOUT A PERMIT )
i
j Acting pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-
215.6A, I, Kerri T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), make the following:
j
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. On March 16, 2000, DWQ staff observed a discharge of liquid
fertilizer treated with a blue indicator dye into Smith Mill
Creek from a spill at Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc. The
. discharge resulted from a spill which occurred during an
operation to mix liquid fertilizer with a blue indicator dye
prior to application to the plants. It originated inside the
mixing room (building) and'drained from the building into an
outside piping system which transported the spilled material
to the stream.
B. DWQ staff observed that the liquid.fertilizer flowed from the
building, flowed into the piping system and was discharged
! into Smith Mill Creek.
C. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., is located adjacent to Cowan
j, Cove Road (NCSR 1324) located northwest of Asheville, N.C. in
Buncombe County. Smith Mill Creek crosses the property.
I
D. Smith Mill Creek bears a Class "C" Classification in the
French Broad River Basin.
E. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., do not have a permit to
discharge liquid fertilizer into North Carolina surface
waters.
E. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this
matter totaled $ 427.46. Based upon the above Findings of
j Fact, I make the following:

i
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
i
i
A. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., is a "person" within the
meaning of G.S.143-215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. The liquid fertilizer cited in finding of Fact A above falls
within the definition of Waste as found in G.S. 143-213(18).
C. The spill of liquid fertilizer cited in finding of Fact A
falls within the definition of a Discharge of Waste as found
in G.S. 143-213(9).
D. The Discharge of Waste resulted in pollution of Smith Mill
Creek as defined in G.S. 143-215(19).
i
E. A permit is required to discharge waste material into North
Carolina surface waters pursuant to G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6)
F. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., violated G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6)
by discharging liquid fertilizer into Smith Mill Creek, waters
of North Carolina on March 16, 2000.
j G. Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., may be assessed civil penalties
in this matter pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which
provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars per violation may be assessed against a person who is
required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required
by G.S. 143-215.1.
H. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed
against Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.3 (a) (9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b) (8) .
I. The Director, Division.of Water Quality, pursuant to
delegation provided for by G.S. 143-215.6A(h), has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I
make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., is assessed a civil
penalty of:
$ for discharging liquid fertilizer into

Smith Mill Creek without a permit fpr
this discharge as required by G.S. 143-
215.1(a).
$ TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is o
percent of the maximum penalty authorized
by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 427.46 Enforcement costs
C
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of
the penalty I have considered the factors .listed in
G.S.143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the
State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or
on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Kerri T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality

CERTIFICATION PAGE
I certify that the information in this report is
true to the best of my knowledge.
signature f Ffrin ipal Investigator(s):
DATE:

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
TYPE: Discharging without a Permit
VIOLATOR: Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
ADDRESS: Post Office Box 6618
Asheville, N.C. 28816
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resourcesof the
State, to the public health, or to private property resulting
from the violation; Environmental damage appears limited to
discharge and visual presence of spilled liquid fertilizer (blue
indicator dye) in Smith Mill Creek, Class "C" waters in the
French Broad River Basin.
(See Pictures - Attachment B)
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation; The discharge
resulted from a spill which occurred on the morning of
March 16, 2000.
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity; Blue dye
indicator for the fertilizer was present in downstream
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage; The cost in correcting this
problem and preventing future spills from entering the surface
waters is minimal. Housekeeping measures, cleanup of
contaminated soil, and closing off discharge pipe which appears
to be in place solely to drain mixing room.
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance; Unknown
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
Given the lack of interest in addressing the problem (see
Groundwater report), one would have to conclude that Greenhouse
personnel were both careless and unconcerned about the spill and
discharge (See Groundwater Report - Attachment A)

(7) The prior record of the violator in complying,or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority;
(a) A pesticide spill (over -application) on August 26, 1996
resulted in death of aquatic life and a water quality
impact in a downstream neighbor's pond (Charles Clouse)
immediately downstream. Damage in stream minimal.
Endosulfan found in small concentrations in the pond.
Department of Agriculture assessed applicator for the
problem.
Since this occurrence, downstream sampling for Endosulfan
and investigations on Hyman Young Greenhouse property has
become almost routine. Sample results have been less than
WQ standards.
(b) On May 1, 1997, oil was found in the stream immediately
downstream of the Greenhouse and in Mr. Clouse's pond. Hyman
Young Greenhouses, Inc., currently is undergoing a
groundwater remediation exercise. Oil surfaces into the
stream from groundwater accumulation.
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures;
Groundwater Costs in Investigation
& Report Preparation: 8.5 hours @ 26.02877 = 221.24
Enforcement Report Preparation:
2 hr @ 33.11' = 66.22
Supervisor review and processing 40.00
Raleigh review and processing = 100.00
Total Costs: 427.46
(9) Type of violator and general nature of business;
Greenhouse
(10) Violators degree of cooperation or recalcitrance. -
At the request of the regional office, Hyman Young Greenhouses
closed off underdrainage system present in each greenhouse
adjacent to Smith Mill Creek. Subsequent sampling indicated that
this work was effective as only trace amounts of Endosulfan have
consistently been present in downstream waters. Relationship with
downstream property owner (Mr. Clouse) has not been good.
(11) Mitigating Circumstances; Old greenhouse used to doing business
the old way without significant consideration to environmental
impacts.

(12) Assessment Factors; N/A
a) IWC
b) Receiving Stream
c) SOC/JOC status/negotiations
d) Copy of MP screen
e) Copy of Limits page
f) Damage

r
Complaint Report, by G. Landon Davids r04 Section
Distribution:Jr
Ivan Vikin, Special Agent, EPA
Charles Clouse
Denise Belew, Buncombe Co.
Date: 03.16.00
Surface Water Body Impacted: Smith Mill Creek
Location: Mr. Charles Clouse/Hyman Young Greenhouses
Time Complaint Received.: —8:45 am
Complaint by Charles Clouse: Greenish -blue color in stream and all throughout pond.
Weather: light to moderate, intermittent rain.
Report:
Arrived at Charles Clouse's property around 9:15 am. Denise Belew (Buncombe Co.
Env. Response) was already onsite along with Charles and wife Patty. Went to stream
area on property and observed greenish -blue discoloration of water particularly
observable upstream of petroleum absorbent boom locations, at deeper portion of stream.
No petroleum sheen was observed on this particular day. Clouse's pond appeared heavily
discolored throughout especially noticeable near the inflow pipe. Charles said he had
cleaned his pond within the last few days including partially draining the pond. He had
just begun to refill the pond by diverging water from the stream presumably before the
release. He had stopped flow of water into the pond when he noticed the discoloration of
the stream water. Charles stated that the discoloration had begun that morning. I called
Max Haner of the DWQ, DENR to report my findings of the stream impact and to tell
him my next actions. Charles noted that the downstream neighbors were very concerned
and that Charles and his neighbor had found dead frogs along the stream bank. Denise
and myself left the Clouse property to check upstream of the Hyman property first. We
drove to a point above the Hyman property and noted that the stream was of natural
color. We then drove to the office of Hyman Young and requested to see the manager.
Charles Musgrove was notified of our presence and we met him down by the
greenhouses. Charles, Denise and myself walked the stream to the beginning of the
metal, corrugated culvert and noted no discoloration. Musgrove mentioned to me that he
had asked his security person about the kerosene dumping in Clouse's driveway as I
requested and the security person had not noted anything unusual the night/morning of
the dump. We then moved to the discharge point immediately adjacent to the Clouse
property and all noted the discoloration. Musgrove said he would ask Alberta, a
greenhouse employee if there had been any applications today. At this point it started
lightly raining again. We met Alberta (no last name given) outside a greenhouse where

03.16.2000
Hyman Fertilizer Release
Page 2 of 3
she told Charles that she had mixed fertilizer that morning and had had a spill inside the
mixing room. All four proceeded to the fertilizer mixing room that was immediately
adjacent to a larger cardboard storage building with a garage type entrance. The mixing
room door was located immediately adjacent to an elongated floor drain common to
entrances of this garage -type of building. No observable discharge was occurring
although some blue staining near entrance was present. The floor of the mixing room had
almost 1" of fertilizer (liquid) and dye mixture standing in some areas. Blue staining was
also present on the walls. Alberta explained how the spill occurred that she had been
mixing fertilizer and blue dye under a pressure system when a coupling had come loose
spraying blue -dyed, liquid fertilizer out. The fertilizer was a 16-4-12 (see attached info.).
Denise and myself walked around the rear of the building and noted heavily blue -stained
soil and liquid fertilizer actively draining to a 7" PVC drain pipe level with the ground
surface. Evidently, this drain is connected to Smith Mill Creek through the corrugated
portion of the stream that discharges to Clouse property. We told Mr. Musgrove to get
help to stop the release and he radioed for employees. I placed a piece of 7" PVC pipe
lying on the ground over the opening to try and minimize the ongoing release. At least 3
openings were present near the base of the rear of the mixing building with blue -dyed
fertilizer actively dripping out. Alberta said she was unaware of the release to the drain
or even outside of the building and had never noticed the drain behind the building.
Inside of the mixing building is a large above ground storage tank (AST) used to hold
water prior to mixing and distribution to the greenhouses. At the base of the water AST
is a 2" metal drain line with a shutoff valve. The line leads from the base of the AST and
extends through the rear wall of the mixing room and to the outside where it ends near
the subject 7" PVC drain. Alberta stated that the line drain from the AST is used to drain
excess well water not used in mixing. Drainage from the AST appears to be the main
function of the 7" PVC drain as it is not setup or positioned to be used for storm water
drainagg_Based on the spill, the 7" drain leads directly to Smith Mill Creek and connects
to the creek at some point in the metal, corrugated culvert portion beneath the Hyman
property. At this point Denise and I gathered information about the fertilizer and blue
dye. I called Max Haner again to report the source of the stream impact and he said he
would like a report of my findings. I also called Terry Leatherwood and left voice mail
message regarding the release. Denise contacted Southern Agriculture Insecticides, Inc.
in Hendersonville to inquire about the blue dye product. See attached material safety
data sheet on product. Based on review product information, it was determined that no
emergency response was required. Rain was heavy at times during our visit at the
Hyman property. At this point, Hyman employees determined what pipe fitting they
would need to plug the drain; Mr. Musgrove wanted to use concrete but his employees
wanted a removable plug in case of cloggi� Other Hyman employees began scooping
up the impacted soil and brought a skid loader bucket of fresh soil from some other
location. After the employees spent much time scooping up the fertilizer impacted soil I
told Musgrove to direct them to build the earthen dam to further slow the release first

03.16.2000
Hyman Fertilizer Release
Page 3 of 3
dam then deal with the soil. At this point, the employees began building a 2' high
earthen in front of the drain. Fertilizer mixture had stopped draining from the mixing
room at this point. There was additional discussion about how the release could have
been ucke avoided and reported after it happened. I also told Musgrove that an open 5-
gallon of Banrot sitting out should be capped and moved to avoid a release as should 5
55-gallon plastic trash cans full of liquid fertilizer and sitting on top of the storm grate.
Denise and I returned to Clouse property to report our findings and to look at the pond
and stream. The stream appeared to have returned to its normal color after the rain.
However, Clouse's pond remained a deep blueish color. I told Clouse to divert water to
the pond and try and flush out the apparent fertilizer/dye present throughout the pond.
Clouse and I also tried to submerge a large plastic drainpipe he uses for rapidly draining
the pond. He said he would continue to flush the pond. After additional discussion with
Clouse and his neighbor regarding the Hyman property and associated releases, -I
attempted to return a call to Ivan Vikin and left a pager number. Denise left to download
digital images. I visited the adjacent property, down stream to look for additional impacts
to the stream. I walked the neighbors stream the length of his property and noted one
dead fro laying up on the bank of the stream. Various amounts of debris/trash was
present along the stream bank and in the stream almost all of which appeared to be
Hyman greenhouse articles. I returned to the Hyman property to see the area behind the
mixing room. There I noted the earthen dam and removal of fertilizer/dye-impacted soil.
The drainpipe had not been plugged at this point but only with the pipe I placed over it.
Musgrove said they had to go out to purchase a fitting. I told Musgrove that a violation
may result from my report to Haner but that would be up to the DWQ. I again told
Musgrove that Hyman needed to reassess their handling of fertilizers and spills. I also
told him Denise Belew would be glad to perform a walk-through and make
recommendations to avoid a similar release. In regards to the petroleum release and their
requirements, he said they were working with Enviromark to compose an access
agreement for the Clouse property. Left site.

�. SA-50 BLUE COL®RANTs
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
—8i ufadturer's NAme & Addrew rl
Southern Agricultural Insecticides, Inc. Phone: [phone]
P.O. Box 218, Palmetto, Fla. 34220 Chemtrec: 4-800-424-9300
I NOMENCLATURE
Product Name:
Chemical Family:
SA -so BLUE COLORANT
Triphenylmethane Dye
II HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
NA 29 CFR 1910.1200
Page I Of 2
S00HERN AGRICULTURirl {;,L:.;, ;;
P. 0. BOX •429
NENDERSONVILLEi NORTH CAROLINA 28793-0429
III PHYSICAL PROPERTIES (NA=not applicable)
Boilift Point: > 2120 bensity: (water=1)1.05
Vapor Pressure: (mmHg) APPROX 17.5 Evaporation Rate: (Water--1) Approx 1
Reactivity In Water: Negligible Solubility In Water: Completely miscible
Appearance/Odor: Dario blue aqueous solution. Odorless
IV FIRE AND EXPLOSION DATA
Flash Point: > 500°F
Extinguishing Media: NA
Special Fire Fighting Procedures: NA
Unusual Fire Explosion FlitzArds: Avoid contact with steam and vapors generated.
V FIRST AID
Fitttt Aid W EYE E*pblsUla: Fltl§h Byes fdr '18 Ffiiiflu189 With 0I8Eil� bf, Wdt®f, Ilfiing upper and lower lid§ occasionally
WhI1e iftfshthO.GM medical 8ttentlon.
Firtit did tot 8kIN P-Xposurb: remove contaminated clothing. Flush exposed skin surfaces thoroughly with water:
If Irritation develops see a physlclan.
FIRST Aid It SWALLOWED: Contact a physician. ,
First Aid tot INHALATION: Remove subject to fresh air. If breathing difficulty develops see a physician.
SYMPTOMS of OVEREXPOSURE: Repeated skin contact is Irritating. Allergenic response may occur.
VI REACTIVITY
Stability: Stable under normal storage conditions.
Materials to Avoid: Strongly alkaline materials.
Hazardous Decompoaltlon Products: None expected.
VII SPILL OR LEAIPROTECTION
Steps To Be Taken It Spilled: A small spill may be flushed with water. A large spill should be contained and
recovered. Avoid contamination of water sources during recovery process.
Waste Disposal: Residue that can not be used according to label Instructions should be disposed of according to local,
State and Federal regulations. Do not contaminate water sources.
VIII SPECIAL PROTECTION
NOTE: When used In combination with pesticides, all precautions contained in the pesticide labels must be followed.
Resplratory: Type/Condition§: None should be needed unless there Is exposure to spray mist.
Ventilation: Use mechanical ventllatlon to minimize spray mist exposure.
Gloves: Clean impervious gloves for extended or repeated contact with product.
Eye Protection: goggles.
Other protective equipment: Clean, freshly laundered, body covering work clothing and hat.

l�fii` 4-12
Easter Lily Plus
Water Soluble Fertilizer for Continuous Liquid
and Foliar Feed Programs
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:
Near neutral pH reaction helps maintain correct media pH High
nitrate -nitrogen content provides consistently good results. High nitrate
and low phosphorous help combat tip -burn. Chelated micronutrients,
including zinc, and extra magnesium and sulfur.
GUARANTEED ANALYSIS
Total Nitrogen fl'f)........................................
1.01io ammonium nitrogen
10.0% nitrate -nitrogen
5.0°io urea nitrogen
Available Phosphate (P205 )
Soluble Potash (K20).....................................
Magnesium (Mg) ..................
1.0% water soluble magnesium
Sulfur (S), combined .......
Boron(B) ..... ................ . ...............
Coppe( (Cu).... ........ ....
.............
0 05°.o cheiated copper
Iron (Fe)
0 10%, cheiated iron
Manganese (Mil)
0 05% cheiated manganese
Molybdenum (MO)
Zinc (Zn)
0 05'1/0 chclaled Liiic
.................... 16%
0.IOio
I'OI"F:N"I"IAL l3AS1C:1"r�: 9(I Ibs calcnnn
catbonatc equivalent per ion
S01.1113I1,ITY (ntaz.): 4 0 Ibs per gallon
Fertilizer required per volume of concentrate,
16-4.12 (for continuous liquid feed proRrarnQ:
ppm N I
1
50
75
100
200
E.C.
0.34
0.51
0.68
1.36
(mmhoslcm
injector rota
ounces/ al
1:15
0.63
0.95
1.27
2.53
1:50
2.11
3.16
4.22
8 44
1:100
4.22
6.33
8.44
16.88
1:128
5.40
8.10
10.80
21.60
1:200
8.44
12.66
16.90
33.75
E.0 values are approxi nutc Use E.C. levels lu Vedic
appit"Inic I"oedulg Icvtil horn Ilse Infector Adjust for the
E.0 of the urigalton water For conecritrotions greater
than 20(I pin; simply add Es 4(N) pprn = 2 X 2(It I P1wn
= 1i.0 2 72 wW 5.06 w/gal with 1 15 proponioner
USE SUGGESTIONS:
• Eastcr Lilics. Feed at 250-300 ppm N on
constant feed.
• For most bedding plants and cut flowers, iced
at 100 to 200 ppm N With constant liquid
feeding Usc 200 to 400 ppm N for pulse
fccdmg
•': Mums. Lilics. Geraniums. PoinSCIIIa feed at
200 to 300 ppm N with constant liquid
(ceding. 350 - 400 with pulse Nomlal
tv:ucring is 1 quart per sq fl
0 05% Intluor plants use one 'fEiAspoon per yillon
Do Ilot oycr%%aler
00101,
0 05° o
DERIVED FROM:
Potassium 14111ale. So(in(ni Nltiate. then. Ammonium Phosphate,
Mat:nC5ltlnl Sulfiue. IUP' Iil)I)I IA, Iron l:IYI A. Manganese 1:DTA
r•(?pnci 1:1)IA. Btui!'Acid Sttdttinl AfolvNiale 1:10
• (r;udcn Ilse tine lablespixrtt 1)cr galltin tic
c%cr\ 10-14 dais Un tender seedlings tis
tinh a ICaslKKnl per gallon
I•oli;u Allpittaiunl
• •I has (hangiitni IiantiJ:i 1. nut lccununeuJul
lib: Inilat frcdnlg
GENERAL DIRECI�NS:-
• Store Ihti and all Cha )on Iomlulas in n JrN pia.x
1 tphlk seal tglen bag*
to lveverll prtlbuct 1wn enmi:
• Aunate well to Jlssol%t consplelelI I ise lKN
for la-aer "mulls
• I Ise soil and wattr tests to detennipe the lies:
coneentraimm and rates to Use
For more ini6 mInuirl about analysis or testing cul:
!-1{!i}t-rib.: t.1073,
SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS:
For sufriv instruc6tis refer it, the matenal safet%. data
shed or call I-8W-667-8521i.
WARNING. :MAYBE HARMI:UL EF SWAL:owED
ORINHALED MAY CAUSE IRRITATION
• Avuid contact with eves, skin, and clothing
• Wush.thoroughly after handling
• Avuid breathing dust.
• a) not swallow.
FIRST AID:
IN CASE: ()F CONTACT WMI EYES, IMMEDIATELY
FLUSI I WI711 WATER FOR 15 MINUTES CALL A
PHYSICIAN 1MMIDIATELY RINSE FROM SKIN
WASH CLOTHING BEFORE REUSE.
SPILLS AND DISPOSAL:
If spilled, absorb with an then, non-cornbus6b!e rnats:m!
and remove for disposa! aspose of all waste in
accordance with applicable government regulations
FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY.
KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN.
71115 Wriau,,+. nas oeen reo,5lerea wrrh lie yvasn,nat0' jla-
Der): w Aw,cuiture Wne, aoorrea as odeclec:
.I ... ....-:t Ine Wasnmo_tor' slanoa'as I-
.caomnrr- torah mercury moivooenun• redc ,Vr
plw u•r• air, 1- You nave Ine non• In. rece,,� Dlrerd.
ullU" ••C n:. ,rUur.: Was )Olw, s:an;lar a'. Irorn ;r0
MANUFACTURED BY r'
SQM North America > =
3101 iowercreeK 1'arKwa. &u:; 45-
Auanta G:, 3033E . `r'ERY Da`
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS: 1-888-960.3073
ORDERING INFORMATION: 1-800-667-8528

4Fiy\y j
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT -AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 22, 2000
Mr. Charles Musgrove
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
Post Office Box 6618
Asheville, North Carolina 28816
Subject: NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE
ENFORCEMENT ACTION
Violation of NCGS 143-215.1
Discharge of Waste Material
without a Permit
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.
Buncombe County
Dear Mr Musgrove:
This letter will formally advise you that enforcement
recommendations are being prepared against Hyman Young
Greenhouses, Inc., for the discharge of liquid fertilizer to
Smith Mill Creek on March 16, 2000. According to a report of
investigation prepared by G.. Landon Davidson with the
Division's Ground Water Section, the discharge occurred during
activities to mix liquid fertilizer with a blue dye indicator
prior to application to the plants at the greenhouses
operation. The liquid fertilizer flowed from the mixing room
and was discharged to Smith Mill Creek via an outside drain.
The impact of this discharge was visible in downstream waters.
If you have reason why action should not be taken in
this matter, please submit you comments in writing to Max L.
Haner of this office oT me by June 1, 2000.
Thank you for your attention to this letter.
Xc: Landon Davidson
Max L. Haner
Yours truly,
Forres
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
f
aey�'t{nf IbbE'Wf�� 1
2 0 1 0
INTERCHANGE BUILDING} 59 WOODFIN PLACE, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-2414
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

A

JPEG image 640x480 pixels
Subject: [Fwd: PhotoWise images from Album "March 16, 2000"]
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:40:45 -0500
From: Landon Davidson <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: [e-mail], Max Haner <[e-mail]>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PhotoWise images from Album "March 16, 2000"
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:00:47 -0500
From: 'Denise Ballew" <[e-mail]>
Reply -To: 'Denise Ballew" <[e-mail]>
Organization: Buncombe County
To: <[e-mail]>
Sorry, Kind of blurry .You can tell it is a container & see the blue on the wall .
1 of 1 7/12/2000 3:53 PM

JPEG image 480x640 pixels
Subject: [Fwd: PhotoWise images from Album "March 16, 2000"]
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:41:06 -0500
From: Landon Davidson <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
To: [e-mail], Max Haner <[e-mail]>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PhotoWise images from Album "March .16, 2000"
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:58:59 -0500
From: "Denise Ballew" <[e-mail]>
Reply -To: 'Denise Ballew" <[e-mail]>
Organization: Buncombe County
To: <[e-mail]>
1 of 2 7/12/2000 3:53 PM

1 le Citizen -Times
Pppv
LNCOLN 09
on
MERCURY
..,
MoNDAY AuousT 14, 2000
m _
News
;> Local Headlines
Election Links
> Obituaries
> USA Today
Top headlines
Editorial
Business
Schools
Sports
Columnists
Classifieds
Entertainment
Tourism
Special Sections
Contact Us
IV .el&Z,MW�a
REALTY WRLD
MARKErPLACE
C11a gars
for gars .
LOC AL
NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS
TAKE 5 DAILY DEAL OBITUARIES TOURISM
Suit alleges contamination by greenhouse
By Susan Dryman STAFF WRITER
Updated: Aug 13 at 01:30
ASHEVILLE - For 13 years, Bill and
Shirley Parker worked hard and saved
money to build their dream home on
land they owned in the country.
The couple wanted to raise their three
young children in the purity of the rural
Dutdoors, let them squeal with delight
handling frogs and turtles from a
nearby stream, let them eat fresh
vegetables grown on their own land, fix
breakfast with fresh eggs laid by their
awn hens.
Three years ago, they finally made that
i six acres off Johnson School Road
near Hyman Young (ireenhouses.
But since then, their simple way of life has begun dying as fast as the life
is being purged from the stream that runs across their six acres.
The Parkers and their neighbors, Charles and Patsy Clouse, say the
greenhouse's contaminants are to blame, and the two couples have filed a
complaint in Buncombe County Superior Court asking the greenhouse to
take responsibility. They've included evidence from the Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources to prove their allegations.
"We just can't ignore it," Shirley Parker said Friday. "If you don't, then
you live with the consequences. I'm not willing to risk that for the health
of my children and the value of the property."
A spokeswoman for the greenhouse who would not give her name said
she had no comment, other than that the company was no longer in
business. She would not elaborate.
Mrs. Parker said her land was home to abundant wildlife when they
bought it in 1980. But they began noticing changes after they built their
house there in 1997, she said.
"We're seeing less and less wildlife," she said. "We've found dead frogs.
Page 1 of 3
http://www.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?news&20000813—nl 6.txt 8/14/2000

pppi le Citizen -Times Page 2 of 3
We had a turtle last year that was deformed. Our daughter loves animals
and raised ducks, and two of them died mysteriously."
This past March, her husband Bill noticed Smith Mill Creek, which is
downstream from the greenhouse and running through all her property,
had turned a bright shade of blue.
"I want you to come look at this creek," she remembers her husband
telling her.
"I couldn't believe it," she said. "It was the color - it was like, aqua. I
have never in my life seen water that color. It was that day that Bill and I
decided, OK - we'd been on the fence up to that point. We were worried
and didn't know what to do - but at that point, we decided 'This is
enough.' "
Meanwhile, unbeknownst to the Parkers, their neighbors Charles and
Patsy Clouse at 98 Cowan Cove Road had been "battling it for years,"
Mrs. Parker said.
The Clouses had lived there 25 years and wanted to stay there until they
died, the suit says.
In 1992, they built a pond on their property, and Mr. Clouse stocked it
with fish.
In August of 1996, the fish died. The N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources investigated and found elevated levels of
organochlorine and organophosphorous pesticides.
The Department of Agriculture, Food and Drug Protection Division
concluded that a greenhouse employee had improperly applied a product
containing endosulfan to plants at the greenhouse, according to the suit.
The product is not supposed to be applied within 300 feet of streams or
lakes, the suit says. Smith Mill Creek was about 20 feet from the
greenhouse, according to the suit.
Then in May, 1997, the Division of Water Quality of DENR gave the
greenhouse a violation notice after red fuel oil was found coming from
the bank along the property line between Hyman Young Greenhouses
and the Clouse property, according to the suit.
The suit says the greenhouse hired a consultant to conduct an
environmental site assessment, which concluded "widespread petroleum
contamination," at the site.
In April 1998, the fish in Mr. and Mrs. Clouse's pond died again,
according to the suit. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services, Food and Drug Protection Division, concluded that endosulfan
was applied to plants again on March 17, April 4 and April 28, 1998,
according to the suit.
The N.C. Pesticide Board approved a "settlement agreement" between
the employee who applied the chemical and the N.C. Department of
http://www.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?news&20000813 nl6.txt 8/14/2000

ille Citizen -Times Page 3 of 3
Agriculture and Consumer Services. The settlement included fining the
employee $500 and suspending her pesticide applicator certification for
three months.
The suit also says that on Dec. 20, 1999, Mrs. Clouse was "threatened by
an unknown individual who warned her to stop her husband from
making any more complaints about the Hyman Young Greenhouses."
The DENR sent officials to the greenhouse for another inspection this
past Feb. 15. But according to the suit, the greenhouse"was still not in
compliance with North Carolina law more than 2 1/2 years after the
(violation notice) issued in 1997."
Shirley Parker said she just wants the greenhouse to be a good neighbor,
clean up the pollution and compensate them for their financial loss.
In the suit, the couples have also asked for attorney's fees and a jury trial.
A trial date has not been set.
"The creek is so much of why we moved here," she said. "Now you can't
go near it. It's just so irresponsible on their part. They need to be
responsible to everybody who shares that stream."
Contact Dryman at 232-5953 or SDrymana,CITIZEN-TIMES.com
NEWS SPORTS BUSINESS TAKE 5 DAILY DEAL OBITUARIES TOURISM
© 2000 Asheville Citizen -Times.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service
(updated April 21, 2000).
http://www.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/story.egi?news&20000813—nl 6.txt 8/14/2000

James A. Graham
Commissioner
Mr. Charlie E. Clouse
98 Cowan Cove Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Dear Mr. Clouse:
- � C�rxrQYin�x
P.epttrlu enl of &A.grirulfure
anbr Gansu wr *rrbirjes
A nUbt Mtb Prug Frmfertiun Pibision
January 22, 1999
Re: IR98-53
Robert L. Gordon
Director
This Department has completed its investigation into a fish kill on your property. Mr. Max Haner,
from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, collected a water sample
from your pond on April 21, 1998. Laboratory analysis of this sample revealed the presence of endosulfan.
Inspector Terry Leatherwood investigated and learned that Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc.,
applied Endosulfan 3EC to plants on March 17, April 4 and April 28, 1998. He also determined that the
stream that feeds your pond is as close as 20 feet from greenhouses on the Hyman Young property. The
Endosulfan 3EC label states "This product is toxic to fish, birds, and other wildlife... Due to the risk of
runoff and drift, do not apply within a distance of 300 feet of lakes, ponds, streams, and estuaries." Also,
inspection of the pesticide storage areas within the greenhouses revealed that they were not dry.
Based on the results of our investigation, we had reason to believe that Ms. Alberta A. Watts of
Hyman Young Greenhouses, Inc., violated provisions of the North Carolina Pesticide Law and/or
Regulations by using a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling, operating in a faulty, careless, or
negligent manner, and not storing pesticides in an area that is dry. On January 12, 1999, the North
Carolina Pesticide Board approved a Settlement Agreement between Ms. Watts and the North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) which included the payment of $500 by
Ms. Watts to the NCDA&CS, and Ms. Watts agreed to a three (3) month suspension of her Private Pesticide
Applicator Certification beginning May 1, 1999.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
Robert M. Welker
Pesticide S ecialist-� JAN P p � � 2 5 199.g
RMW:SGC 6Nl? l n.. a ;�, -
cc: `•.MY: -Roy-Davis - -
Mr. Dwight E. Seal, District Supervisor
Mr. Terry L. Leatherwood, Pesticide Inspector
Pesticide Section Ill
Post Office Box 27647 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 • [phone] .0
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

PV
Nann, I will be glad to be part of this, but I still think that with the
history that Max should be involved. I will be out of the ARO after
about 12 tomorrow until next Monday, so if it happens while I'm
gone, I am designating Max as the contact person on this issue. Let
us know what you need from DWQ-WQ Section. Thanks. FRW
------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:12:55 -0500
From: Jimmy_Carter_at_NRDCS01 P@mail. en r. state. nc. us (Jimmy Carter)
Subject: Re[4]: Charles at
828-254-9780
To: Bill_Holman@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Bill Holman),
Lori_Jones,@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Lori Jones),
[e-mail]. nc.us,
"Nann Guthrie" <Nann_Guth [e-mail]. nc.us>
Copies to: [e-mail] (Don Reuter),
Richard _Rogers@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Richard Rogers),
[e-mail]. nc.us, [e-mail],
Jimmy_Carter@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Jimmy Carter)
Thank you Nann. A conference call would be helpful. If you will set
up such a call, I will be glad to participate. I'll try not to
tamper with the process too much, but I did tell Mr. Clouse I would
call him back when I discovered something. I gather from your email,
there is a lot of history here. Gina Weaver helps monitor my
schedule so you may want to include her as we figure out a best time.
L'called=M.r_,Clou es on_F_riday�(271"2);; The summary of that
conversation I passed on to Preston Howard and Bill Meyer. Let me
give it to you here as well. Remember, much of the text is my
capturing what Mr. Clouse said.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Transmittal:
EMAIL DATED 2/12/99 TO PRESTON HOWARD AND BILL MEYER FOLLOWS.
Hello, Gentlemen. May I leave this within your programs for now
(i.e., me not directly tamper...).
have returned a call to Mr. Clouse at 9:43am 2/12/99. He has been
in communication with our regional office for about 5 years. Adjacent
Max Haner -- 1 -- Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:05:17

FIV
property owner is a greenhouse that regularly dumps trash, had
pesticide runoff and probably some nutrient runoff affecting water
quality. Mr. Clouse has a creek and a pond that has tested positive
for endosulfan, and there is visible oil saturating the ground around
his property (it oozes out).
The creek has been many colors including purple. There is a green
slime on his pond indicating eutrophication. It took two years to get
the oil leak stoped but there has been no clean up.
Stawberry patch down stream is irrigated out of the creek...
Mr. Clouse operates a bodyshop on his adjacent property. It is his
residence too. He was a small quantity hazardous waste generator but
has reduced his generation. Denise Blue (Buncombe Co. government) gave
him his money back for fees because of his model waste management.
DWQ has been involved from beginning (Mr. Clouse first called Buncombe
Co.) DWQ (Max Haner?) visited in December'98. Told him it wasn't
that bad.
DWQ offered to do a remedial response through a contractor (Steve
Parrot sp?), Mr. Clouse wanted a proposal. They wrote him a proposal
that would be destructive to his property. Their proposal didn't
sound like "cleanup" and the oil leak wasn't found at that point. In
Mr. Clouse's words, they just wanted to tear up all his trees, dig a
big hole and place riprap.
Historically, Mr. Clouse has had trouble getting reports from Dept.
Ag. He waited 1 1/2 years for the first Ag report. Mr. Clouse had to
pay a lawyer $300+ to get a report which should have been public
information.
Mr. Clouse: "no one will take responsibility they all say someone
else should be looking at it."
Even Joe Cole, EPA investigator has been out there. People come and
acknowlege there is a problem, say they will take care of it, then it
just dies down.
Our folks argue over juridiction. Our folks get rude with him. He
Max Haner -- 2 -- Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:05:17

VFV
hates to keep complaining. He told Roy Davis "I hate to keep
complaining". Roy said "Well don't". This made an impression on Mr.
Clouse.
Preston, it seems your folks have had the most exposure to Mr. Clouse
and could provide the background. Within the Regional Office, they
should be able to coordinate an effort to clarify the problem and the
solution. They should include a DWM rep and maybe get someone from
Agriculture involved. Can you elect a lead to solve this problem.
Please ask them to meet before hand in their office to get their
disagreements solved before sharing with ,Mr. Clouse. And maybe we
need to send the message that attitudes (frustrations?) are making all
of us (DENR) look bad.
I'm sure there is another side to this story, there always is. Please
encourage our folks to rise above it and consider how this is
reflecting on our programs. We should also look at the big picture.
What is happening in the surrounding neighborhood? What are the water
supplies. There are fish and wildlife dying...
The citizen 'is Mr. Charles Clouse
[phone]
98 Cowen Cove Road, Asheville
The creek is Cowen Creek (not really sure)
End of Transmittal:
EMAIL DATED 2/12/99 TO PRESTON HOWARD AND BILL MEYER
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Reply Separator
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Charles Clouse 828-254-9780
Author: "Nann Guthrie" <[e-mail]> at Internet
Date: 2/15/99 12:30 PM
Jimmy,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this. I have been out
of the office.
Max Haner -- 3 -- Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:05:17

VFV
The quickest way to bring you up to date would probably be a
conference call with Forrest Westall(WQ), Don Link(GW) and
perhaps Robin Purcell (HW) and me .... and you. It is a long,
conmplicated story.
Let me know if you want me to set something up.
Nann
Date sent: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 09:28:26 -0500
From: Jimmy_Carter_at_NRDCS01 [e-mail] (Jimmy
Carter)
Subject: Re[2]: Charles Clouse 828-254-9780
To: [e-mail]. nc.us,
Lori_Jones@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Lori Jones),
Bill _ Holman @mail. en r. state. nc. us (Bill Holman)
Copies to: Rich ard_Rogers@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Richard Rogers),
Don_Reuter@mail. enr.state. nc.us (Don Reuter)
I'm on it. If any other email recepients have information, please
advise.
- Jimmy
Reply Separator
Subject: Re: Charles Clouse 828-254-9780
Author: Bill Holman at NRDCS01 P
Date: 2/10/99 6:29 PM
Jimmy, can you please look into this and get DWQ & DWM to work together on
solving this problem. Thanks.
Subject
Author:
Date:
Reply Separator
Charles Clouse 828-254-9780
Lori Jones at NRDCS01 P
2/10/99 9:55 AM
per Mr. Clouse.:..His situation has gone on for 5 years now. He said
that oil is running into the creek. Terry Leatherwood, Department of
Max Haner -- 4 -- Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:05:17

VFV
Agriculture, has done soil testing and fined the greenhouse folks
again. They put garbage (plastic containers/pots) into the creek.
His birds and fish are dying so he wants to know what does it do to
him. Max Haner went to the property on December 21. Groundwater
folks and aboveground water folks have been to his property and Clouse
said that staff even argue in front of him over who has jurisdiction.
Said he can stick a shovel into the ground and oil comes up.
He is really frustrated. He feels this is a hazardous waste situation
as well. Said it isn't being monitored on a regular bases. The
greenhouse folks run chemicals into the creek.
he wants to know what else can be done. Charles Clouse said he will
call Channel 13 again ... it's been on TV twice; and if that doesn't
work, he'll pay to take an ad in the paper.
Nann Guthrie
Senior Field Officer
Western Region, NCDENR
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville NC 28801 USA
Forrest R. Westall, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
NC Department of Envrironment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality, Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone], Ex. 251, Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]. state. nc.us
Max Haner -- 5 -- Tue, 16 Feb 1999 09:05:17

`1 /A Farm Equipment Co. of Asheville, Inc.
690 Riverside Drive P.O. Box 2745 • Phone [phone]
IIEWH0LLAIID Asheville, N.C. 28802
July 23, 2003
N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, N. C. 28801-2414
Attention: Forrest R. Westall
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Dear Mr. Westall:
After receiving your letter dated July 14, 2003
concerning the violation of NCGS215.1(a).(6), we have
stopped all operations that created direct or indirect
discharges of water, oil and grease. We stopped this
operation as of July 16, 2003.
jg
2 5 2003
Since that date, I have been in contact with Larry
Frost with NCDENR, Chu Chi with NCDENR, Monty Payne with
MSD, and Gary McGill with McGill Associates. Between the
five of us we have developed a plan to remedy the above
mentioned violation.
With respect to timing; we intend to have our planned
project completed within 60 days, but no more than 90
days. Until the completion of the project; Farm Equipment.
Co., Inc. will not create any contaminated waters.
Should you have any questions, please call
[phone].
Sincerely,
FARM EQUIPMENT CO. OF ASHEVILLE, INC.
cs J Wayn. Roberson
rc: Larry Frost - NCDENR
Chu Chi - NCDENR
Monty Payne - MSD

Oem
Michael F. Easley,
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Regional Office
WATER QUALITY SECTION
July 14, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Russ Roberson
Farm Equipment Co. of Asheville, Inc.
690 Riverside Drive
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Subject: Notice of Violation
General Statute NCGS 143-215.1.(a).(6)
Farm Equipment Co. of Asheville, Inc.
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Roberson:
Recently Mr. Larry Frost of this Office inspected your property, with your assistance, and
determined that the wash area at the rear of your facility, next to the river, was discharging wash
water containing oil and grease into a ditch adjacent to the French Broad River. NCGS 143-
215.1.(a).(6) states that "No person shall ..Cause or permit any waste, directly or indirectly, to be
discharged to or in any manner intermixed with the waters of the State..." It has therefore been
determined that your Company is in violation of NCGS 215.1(a).(6) and you could be assessed a civil
penalty of $25,000.00 per day for each violation. In order to minimize your exposure to civil penalties
you are requested to take the following measures:
Immediately cease all operations on your property that may be creating direct and indirect
dischargesto the waters of the State, including but not limited to the wash area behind your
facility and adjacent to the French Broad.
Remove all wash water and wash water, oil and grease mixture from the adjacent ditch in the
`wash area and dispose of it properly.
Remove all contaminated soils from the adjacent area and dispose of them properly.
Respond to -this Office within ten (10) working days, in writing, when these actions are to occur
and when they have be completed.
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Mr. Roberson
July 14, 2003
Page 2
Furthermore, if you intend to utilize the current wash area as a wash area in the future you will
be required to capture all runoff and discharge to the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe
County sewer system. Mr. Mike Butler will be able to answer any questions regarding MSD
Specifications and Standards for connection to the MSD Sewer System and can be contacted at
[phone].
Finally, a written response to this Notice of Violation (NOV) is required within 10 working days of
receipt. Please, include in your response information regarding your timing and plans to comply with
this NOV. Should you have any questions regarding this NOV, please contact Mr. Larry Frost at
[phone].
Sincerely,
r .,;� �l
, �`rrest . /stall
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
xc: Groundwater Section — ARO
Mike Butler — MSD
Larry Frost
59 Woodfin Place Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
A. ignatere,-
Agent
A71
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
4
Addresse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
B. cal by (Printed Name)
(// r,�
U W
C. Date of Deliver,
/ ��
or on the front if space permits.
c
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑ Yes/�=
1. Article Addressed to:
- - ---
if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
I -AR. PU' S It OB OS (W
-
PAR-10 -(urP1VTEA!T COMPANY OFAS.+' EWLL6, rr31
.4 StiL'.1'.i LE: Ne 2$,?t'7
I
s. Servit
'�Otype
ertified-Mail ❑ E ress Mail
❑ Registered etum Receipt"for Merchandise
05
P v
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? Fee)
(Extra ❑ Yes
2. -
7001 2510 0009 1126 5530 -
PS Form.3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-03-P-40

-UNITED STATES POSTAL
loll
jV 16 JUL '
?I V
1AR. ARR V FROS
DW141 - OVOS
F -E -A,F'itV LAC
Al f",rC 28801
Fi,�4z a ail
s!
ostag TF
LISPS
rmifNo.-G-1(Y—_
0