660084_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200715

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® - � O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
C) Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: LRoutine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: L,l. Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: l Legion:
Farm Name: nt 4� foLy rn Owner Email:
Owner Name: ski_ rn T 1p wl i� n IV FCL T M % L C Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: CLVr.a
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
3 (o, OL 4 $ i 1t
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title: Phone:
Integrator: Oaf LMtfv} VL_tL J, prnre C;ahk
Certification Number: A LA]p I 0 D ;Z $S $'
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
ro
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Diseharnes and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes �TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters []Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I oj3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: r7. cc' -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes fZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _
Spillway?: 1V p iV O r
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[Z No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[�TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes GZ(No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [;JNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
24.laid the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0�0 a1 ' b���1vN
25. is the facility out of compliance w�tpermit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. rA.a.G 9,019 5S
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
V] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Ycs
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes PfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Ycs ffNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 0No
❑ Yes [7f No
[:]Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility
� to better explain situations (use additional )ages as necessa ). EPEE ..3r" I o -aelp -5i j 9- a lq &yya/j IAEE& ` GEE
-o��- .°� 10w
- ws
orsLM C -0
r
-0Qo
V o -n
r
;U 'A p
r, T'
'
y A p A
w W 9j U
,V vwv O .r
-'-vo•�-0
ul
aCk
Reviewerl Inspector Name:
Reviewer Inspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
Phone: q_ ..V ' i y r7
Date: ! — 1 "�-' Wit:_
2/4/2015