Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000424_FLETCHER MS4 AUDIT REPORT_20200720MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4)
PROGRAM AUDIT REPORT
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCS000424
Town of Fletcher, NORTH CAROLINA
300 Old Cane Creek Road
Audit Date: July 16, 2020
Report Date: July 17, 2020
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources Stormwater Program
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9th floor
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
(This page intentionally left blank)
NCS000424 Fletcher MS4 Audit 20200116
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AuditDetails..................................................................................................................................................1
PermitteeInformation..................................................................................................................................2
List of Supporting Documents.......................................................................................................................3
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment...........................................................................4
PublicEducation and Outreach.....................................................................................................................7
Public Involvement and Participation...........................................................................................................8
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)........................................................................................9
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations..................................................11
Total Maximum Daily Loads(TMDLs)..........................................................................................................13
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1.............................................................................................14
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1......................................................................................................16
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 2......................................................................................................17
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1............................................18
DISCLAIMER
This audit consists of an evaluation of program compliance with the issued permit and implementation of
the approved Stormwater Management Plan. This audit report does not include a review of all program
components, and program deficiencies in addition to those noted may be present. The permittee is
required to assess program progress and permit compliance, and to implement the approved Stormwater
Management Plan in accordance with the issued permit.
NCS000424 Fletcher MS4 Audit 20200716 II
This page intentionally left blank
NCS000424 Fletcher MS4 Audit 2020071b
Audit Details
Audit ID Number:
Audit Date(s):
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716
July 16, 2020
Minimum Control Measures Evaluated:
® Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
® Public Education & Outreach
M Public Involvement & Participation
X Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination
❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls— No delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program
❑ Construction Site Runoff Controls — Delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program
❑ Post -Construction Site Runoff Controls
© Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
© Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
Field Site Visits:
0 Municipal Facilities. Number visited: 1
© MS4 Outfalls. Number visited: 2
❑ Construction Sites. Number visited: Choose an item.
0 Post -Construction Stormwater Runoff Controls. Number visited: 1
❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item.
❑ Other: Number visited: Choose an item.
Inspector(s) Conducting Audit
Name, Title
Organization
Isaiah Reed, Environmental Specialist
NCDEQ
Audit Report Author-
Date:
Signature _�
7Z'7/ 7
Audit Report Author:
Date
Signature
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher M54 Audit_20200716 Page 1 of 19
Permittee Information
M54 Permittee Name:
Town of Fletcher
Permit Effective Date:
February 20, 2017
Permit Expiration Date:
February 19, 2020
Mailing Address:
300 Old Cane Creek Road
Date of Last MS4 Inspection/Audit:
02/27/2014
Co-permittee(s), if applicable:
Permit Owner of Record:
William B. Moore, Mayor
Primary MS4 Representatives Participating in Audit
Name, Title
organization
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
McGill
Natalie J. Berry, Project Engineer
Henderson County
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
Town of Fletcher
Jabbo Pressley, Public Works Director
Town of Fletcher
MS4 Receiving Waters
Waterbody
Classification
Impairments
Cane Creek
C
Fish Tissue Mercury (Nar, FC, NC), Benthos (Nar,
AL, FW)
Pinner Creek
C;Tr
Hoopers Crek
C;Tr
Kimsey Creek
C
Higgins Creek
C
Frady Lake
C
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 2 of 19
List of Supporting Documents
Item
Number
Document TitEe
When Provided
(Prior to/During/After)
1
SWMPA
During
2
Agreement with Henderson County
Prior to
3
Pesticide certification
During
4
Staff training sign in sheet.
During
5
Fletcher, NC Land Development Code
Prior to
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 3 of 19
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title, Role)
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Natalie J. Berry, Project Engineer
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status
supporting
Doc No.
il.A.l
The permittee maintained adequate funding and staffing to implement and manage
Staffing and
the provisions of the Stormwater Plan and meet all requirements of the permit.
No
---
Funding
The Stormwater Plan identifies a specific position(s) responsible for the overall
coordination, implementation, and revision to the Plan.
No
---
Responsibilities for all components of the Stormwater Plan are documented and
position(s) assignments provided.
No
---
The permittee is current on payment of invoiced administering and compliance
monitoring fees (see stormwater e-payments on DEMLR MS4 web page).
Yes
---
No Stormwater Management Plan has been maintained or implemented.
II.A.2 Stormwater
The permittee evaluated the performance and effectiveness of the program
Plan
components at least annually.
Yes
1
Implementation
and Evaluation
If yes, the permittee used the results of the evaluation to modify the program
components as necessary to accomplish the intent of the Stormwater Program.
No
---
Did the permitted MS4 discharges cause or contribute to non -attainment of an
applicable water quality standard?
No
---
If yes, did the permittee expand or better tailor its BM Ps accordingly to address
the non -attainment?
No
---
SWMPA has been submitted regularly, but no documented modifications to the SWMP.
ILA-3
Keeping the
The permittee kept the Stormwater Plan up to date.
No
Stormwater Plan
Up to Date
The permittee notified DEMLR of any updates to the Stormwater Plan.
No
---
A SWMP has not been maintained and implemented.
II.A.4 Availability
The permittee kept an up-to-date version of its Stormwater Plan available to the
of the Stormwater
Division and the public online.
No
Plan
The online materials included ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, or a list
See
identifying the ordinances, or other regulatory mechanisms, providing the legal
Partial
commen
authority necessary to implement and enforce the requirements of the permit.
is
Ordinances and regulatory documents available at:
Hendersoncountync.gov/waterresources/page/storm water-phase-ii-local-program
Fletchernc.org
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher M54 Audit_20200716 Page 4 of 19
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
II.A.3 & II.A.S
Not
Stormwater Plan
require a modification to the Stormwater Plan?
Did D>=MLR re q
Applicable
__ -
Modifications
If yes, did the permittee complete the modifications in accordance with the
Not
established deadline?
Applicable
_
No SWMP has been submitted or implemented.
II.A.6 Sharing
Responsibility
Are any control measures implemented by an entity other than the permittee?
Yes
2
If yes, is there a written agreement in place?
Partial
2
An agreement is in place with Henderson County but it does not reference the MCM or permit number specifically.
II.A.7
The permittee maintained written procedures for implementing the six minimum
Written
control measures.
No
--
Procedures
Written procedures identified specific action steps, schedules, resources and
responsibilities for implementing the six minimum measures.
No
---
No written procedures have been maintained by the permittee.
III. A
The permittee maintained documentation of all program components including, but
Program
not limited to, inspections, maintenance activities, educational programs,
No
---
Documentation
implementation of BMPs, enforcement actions etc., on file for a period of five years.
The permittee has not maintained documentation of all program components.
111.13
The permittee submitted annual reports to the Department within twelve months
Annual Report
from the effective date of the permit (See Section 11l.B. for the annual reporting
Yes
1
Submittal
period specific to this MS4).
The permittee submitted subsequent annual reports every twelve months from the
scheduled date of the first annual report submittal.
Yes
1
The Annual Reports included appropriate information to accurately describe the progress, status, and results
of the permittee's Stormwater Plan, including, but not limited the following;
1. A detailed description of the status of implementation of the Stormwater Plan
as a whole. This will include information on development and implementation
Not
of each major component of the Stormwater Plan for the past year and
Reviewed
schedules and plans for the year following each report.
2. An adequate description and justification of any proposed changes to the
Stormwater Plan. This will include descriptions and supporting information for
Not
the proposed changes and how these changes will impact the Stormwater
Reviewed
--
Plan (results, effectiveness, implementation schedule, etc.).
3. Documentation of any necessary changes to programs or practices for
assessment of management measures implemented through the Stormwater
Not
Reviewed
Plan.
4. A summary of data accumulated as part of the Stormwater Plan throughout
the year along with an assessment of what the data indicates in light of the
Not
Reviewed
Stormwater Plan.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 5 of 19
Program Implementation, Documentation & Assessment
5. An assessment of compliance with the permit, information on the
establishment of appropriate legal authorities, inspections, and enforcement
Not
Reviewed
-
actions.
SWMPA submitted annually.
IV.B
Annual Reporting
The Annual Reports document the following:
1. A summary of past year activities, including where applicable, specific
Not
quantities achieved and summaries of enforcement actions.
Reviewed
2. A description of the effectiveness of each program component.
Not
Reviewed
---
3. Planned activities and changes for the next reporting period, for each
Not
program component or activity.
Reviewed
-
4. Fiscal analysis.
Not
Reviewed
SWMPA submitted annually.
NC5000424_Town of Fletcher M54 Audit_20200716 Page 6 of 19
Public Education and Outreach
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title, Role)
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Natalie J. Berry, Project Engineer
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status
Supporting
Doc No.
I I. B.2. a
The permittee defined goals and objectives of the Local Public Education and
Goals and
Outreach Program based on community wide issues.
No
---
Objectives
II.B.2.b
The permittee maintained a description of the target pollutants and/or stressors and
Target Pollutants
likely sources.
No
---
II.B.2.c
The permittee identified, assessed annually and updated the description of the target
Target Audiences
audiences likely to have significant storm water impacts and why they were selected.
No
---
II.B.2.d Residential
The permittee described issues, such as pollutants, the likely sources of those
and Industrial/
pollutants, potential impacts, and the physical attributes of stormwater runoff in
No
---
Commercial Issues
their education/outreach program.
11.B.2.e
The permittee promoted and maintained an internet web site designed to convey the
informational
program's message.
No
---
Web Site
II.B.2.f
The permittee distributed stormwater educational material to appropriate target
Public Education
No
---
Materials
groups.
II.B.2.g
The permittee promoted and maintained a stormwater hotline/helpline for the
Hotline/Help Line
purpose of public education and outreach.
No
---
II.B.2.h
The permittee's outreach program, including those elements implemented locally or
Public Education
through a cooperative agreement, included a combination of approaches designed to
No
---
and Outreach
reach the target audiences.
Program
For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or
through a cooperative agreement the permittee estimated and recorded the extent
No
---
of exposure.
The permittee has not maintained a Public education and outreach program.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 7 of 19
Public Involvement and Participation
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title, Role)
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Natalie Berry, Project Engineer
Permit Citation
Program Requirement Status Supporting
Doc No.
II.C.2.a Volunteer
Community
The permittee included and promoted volunteer opportunities designed to promote
No
Involvement
ongoing citizen participation.
Program
The permittee does not promote volunteer opportunities to promote ongoing citizen participation.
II.C.2.b
Mechanism for
The permittee provided and promoted a mechanism for public involvement that
Public
provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program.
No
---
Involvement
II.C.2.c
The permittee promoted and maintained a hotline/helpline for the purpose of public
Hotline/Help Line
involvement and participation.
Na
---
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 8 of 19
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title,
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Role)
labbo Pressley, Public Works Director
Permit Citation
Program Requirement
Status SupportingDoc No.
I I. D.2. a
IDDE Program
The permittee maintained a written IDDE Program.
No ---
If yes, the written program includes provisions for program assessment and
Not
evaluation and integrating program.
_
Applicable
No Written IDDE Program has been maintained.
The permittee maintained an IDDE ordinance or other regulatory mechanism(s) that
II.D.Z.b
provides the legal authority to prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the M54.
Yes
5
Legal Authorities
If yes, the ordinance applies throughout the corporate limits of the permittee.
[Permit Part I.D]
Yes
5
Il.o.z.c
The permittee maintained a current map showing major outfalls* and receiving
Storm Sewer
No
---
System Map
strea ms.
A current map has not been maintained by the permittee. A map from 2007 is available.
II.D.2.d
The permittee maintained a program for conducting dry weather flow field
Dry Weather Flow
observations in accordance with written procedures.
No
---
Program
No dry weather flow field observation program has been written or implemented.
II.D.2.e
The permittee maintained written procedures for conducting investigations of
Investigation
identified illicit discharges.
No
---
Procedures
No written procedure has been maintained for IDDE.
II.D.2.f
For each case of an illicit discharge or potential illicit discharge, the permittee documented and tracked the
Track and
following:
Document
Investigations
1. The date(s) the illicit discharge was observed
No
---
2. The results of the investigation
No
---
3. Any follow-up of the investigation
No
---
4. The date the investigation was closed
No
---
No tracking mechanism has been implemented for IDDE.
II.D.2.g Employee
The permittee implemented and documented a training program for appropriate
Training
municipal staff who, as part of their normal job responsibilities, may come into
No
---
contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection.
NO specific IDDE training in implemented regularly by the permittee.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 9 of 19
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
II.D.2.h
The permittee informed public employees of hazards associated with illegal
Public Education
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
No
---
The permittee informed businesses of hazards associated with illegal discharges and
improper disposal of waste.
Na
---
The permittee informed the general public of hazards associated with illegal
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
Na
---
II.d.2.i
The permittee promoted, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for the
See
Public Reporting
public to report illicit discharges.
Yes
website
Mechanism
The permittee promoted, publicized, and facilitated a reporting mechanism for staff
to report illicit discharges.
No
---
The permittee established and implemented response procedures for citizen
requests/reports.
Partial
---
Responses to citizen requests documented in correspondence.
II.D.2.1
The permittee implemented a mechanism to track the issuance of notices of violation
Enforcement
and enforcement actions administered by the permittee.
No
---
If yes, the mechanism includes the ability to identify chronic violators for Not
initiation of actions to reduce noncompliance. Applicable
No NOV tracking mechanism has been maintained and implemented.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4Audit_20200716 Page 10 of 19
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title, Role)
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Jabbo Pressley, Public Works Director
Permit Citation
Program Requirement Status Supporting
Doc No.
II.6.2.a
The permittee maintained a current inventory of facilities and operations owned
Facility Inventory
and operated by the permittee with the potential for generating polluted No ---
stormwater runoff.
There has no inventory maintained of municipal facilities.
11.6.2.b
The permittee maintained and implemented an 0&M program for municipally
Operation and
owned and operated facilities with the potential for generating polluted
No
-
Maintenance (O&M)
stormwater runoff.
for Facilities
If yes, the 0&M program specifies the frequency of inspections.
No
---
If yes, the O&M program specifies the frequency of routine maintenance
No
---
requirements.
If yes, the permittee evaluated the O&M program annually and updated it as
Na
---
necessary.
No O&M Program has been maintained for municipal facilities.
II.G.2.c
Spill Response
The permittee had written spill response procedures for municipal operations.
No
-
Procedures
The permittee has recently created a spill response and reporting plan to be implemented moving forward.
II.G.2.d Streets,
The permittee evaluated existing and new BMPs that reduce polluted stormwater
Roads, and Public
runoff from municipally -owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within its
No
Parking Lots
corporate limits annually.
Maintenance
If yes, the permittee evaluated the effectiveness of existing and new BMPs
Not
based on cost and the estimated quantity of pollutants removed.
Applicable
No annual evaluation has been documented.
II.G.2.f
The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for the stormwater
O&M for Catch
sewer system including catch basins and conveyance systems that it owns and
No
---
Basins and
maintains.
Conveyance Systems
No O&M plan has been maintained for the stormwater system.
Il.G.2.d
The permittee maintained a current inventory of municipally -owned or operated
Structural
structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with the permittee's post-
No
---
Stormwater Controls
construction ordinance.
An inventory of municipally owned SCMs.
NCS000424 Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit 20200716 Page 11 of 19
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
II.G.2.e
The permittee maintained and implemented an O&M program for municipally -
O&M for Structural
owned or maintained structural stormwater controls installed for compliance with
No
---
Stormwater Controls
the permittee's post -construction ordinance. If yes, then;
The O&M program specified the frequency of inspections and routine
maintenance requirements.
No
---
The permittee documented inspections of all municipally -owned or maintained
structural stormwater controls.
No
---
The permittee inspected all municipally -owned or maintained structural
stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee.
No
---
The permittee maintained all municipally -owned or maintained structural
stormwater controls in accordance with the schedule developed by permittee.
No
---
The permittee documented maintenance of all municipally -owned or
maintained structural stormwater controls.
Na
---
No written program has been maintained far municipally owned Structureal Control Measures.
II.G.2.f
The permittee ensured municipal employees are properly trained in pesticide,
Pesticide, herbicide
herbicide and fertilizer application management.
Yes
3
and Fertilizer
Application
The permittee ensured contractors are properly trained in pesticide, herbicide and
Management
fertilizer application management.
No
___
The permittee ensured all permits, certifications, and other measures for
Not
applicators are followed.
Applicable
Permittee has Pesticide certifications for Public Works Director.
II.G.2.g
The permittee implemented an employee training program for employees involved
Staff Training
in implementing pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices.
Yes
4
Staff training last implemented March 9, 2020.
II.G.2.h
The permittee described and implemented measures that prevent or minimize
Vehicle and
contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment
No
---
Equipment Cleaning
cleaning.
No documentation available for implemented measures.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher M54Audit_20200716 Page 12 of 19
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
Staff Interviewed:
Eric Rufa, Planning Director
(Name, Title, Role)
Christine Brown, Engineering Technician
Natalie Berry, Project Engineer
Program Status:
❑ The permittee is not subject to an approved TMDL (skip the rest of this section).
© The permittee is subject to an approved TMDL for: Fish Tissue Mercury (Nar, FC, NC) 2008, Benthos (Nar, AL, FW) 2008.
There ❑ is ❑ is not a Waste Load Allocation (WLA) in the approved TMDL (If there is a WLA, then complete items H.H.1-5
below. if there is not a WLA, skip to item H.N.6 below)
Permit Citation Program Requirement Status Supporting
Doc No.
II.H.3 TMDLs Within 12 months of final TMDL approval, the permittee's annual reports included
a description of existing programs, controls, partnerships, projects and strategies to No
address impaired waters.
Within 12 months of final TMDL approval, the permittee's annual reports provided
a brief explanation as to how the programs, controls, partnerships, projects and No ---
strategies address impaired waters.
Town staff did not address any of the impairments of Cane Creek,
II.H.4 TMDLs
Within 24 months of final TMDL approval, the permittee's annual reports included
an assessment of whether additional structural and/or non-structural BMPs are
No
---
necessary to address impaired waters.
Within 24 months of final TMDL approval, the permittee's annual reports included
a brief explanation as to how the programs, controls, partnerships, projects and
No
---
strategies address impaired waters.
No TMDL considerations have been included in the annual reports.
II.H.5 TMDLs
Within 36 months of final TMDL approval, the permittee's annual reports included
a description of activities expected to occur and when activities are expected to
No
---
occur.
No TMDL considerations have been included in the annual reports.
II.H.6 TMDLs
If there is no Waste Load Allocation in the approved TMDL, the permittee
evaluated strategies and tailored and/or expanded BMPs within the scope of the
six minimum measures to enhance water quality recovery strategies in the
No
---
watershed(s) to which the TMDL applies.
The permittee described strategies and tailored and/or expanded BMPs in their
Stormwater Management Plan and annual reports
No
---
No TMDL considerations have been included in the annual reports.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 13 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No. 1
Facility Name:
Public Works Facility
Date and Time of Site Visit:
July 16, 2020. 2:00pm
Facility Address:
25 Howard Gap Road
Name of MS4 inspector(s) evaluated:
Eric Rufa
Facility Type (Vehicle Maintenance, Landscaping, etc.):
Vehicle Maintenance
Most Recent MS4 Inspection (List date and name of inspector):
N/A
Name(s) and Title(s) of Facility Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit:
Name
Title
Public Works Director
Jabbo Pressley
Observations
Facility Documentation/Training
Does the facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) or similar document? Is it facility -specific?
No
What type of stormwater training do facility employees receive? How often?
None
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
Stormwater DVD. Periodically. No set schedule.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about Permit requirements for pollution prevention and good housekeeping?
No
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about stormwater pollution prevention and good housekeeping?
Yes
Inspection Procedures
Does the MS4 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form?
No
Does the MS4 inspector's process include taking photos?
No
Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the facility's SWPPP (or similar document)?
No
Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire facility and inspecting all points of discharge?
No
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious areas of concern? If so, explain:
No
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 14 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: Municipal Facility No, 1
Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the facility contact?
No
Inspection Results
Did the facility inspection result in any corrective actions to be implemented? If so, for what issue(s)?
Yes. The valve for the secondary containment was not maintained in an off position.
If compliance corrective actions were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided?
Corrected during inspection.
Notes/Comments/Recommendations
The permittee had not designated any specific staff for the facility inspections.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200715 Page 15 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 1
Outfall ID Number:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
None
7/16/2020
3:00 p m
Outfall Location:
Outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.):
85 Howard Gap Road
-18 inch plastic pipe.
Receiving Water: Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate,
Cane Creek Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.):
No flow present.
Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date):
None
Days Since Last Rainfall: Inches:
N/E
Name of MS4 Inspector(s) evaluated:
Eric Rufa
Observations
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the M54 inspector receive? How often?
stormwater DVD.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations?
Yes.
Inspection Procedures
Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form?
No
Does the inspector's process include taking photos?
No
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they?
No
Inspection Results
Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)?
No
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 AuditW20200716 Page 16 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: MS4 Outfall No. 2
Outfall ID Number:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
None
7/16/2020 3:30pm
Outfall Location:
outfall Description (Pipe Material/Diameter, Culvert, etc.):
404 Glennsprings Drive
Undetermined
Receiving Water:
Is Flow Present? If So, Describe (Color, Approximate Flow Rate,
Unnamed tributary of Cane Creek
Sheen, Odor, Floatables/Debris, etc.):
No flow observed.
Most Recent Outfall Inspection/Screening (Date):
None
Days Since Last Rainfall:
Inches:
N/E
Name of MS4 Inspector's):
Eric Rufa
Observations
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
Stormwater DVD. No regular schedule.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about illicit discharge indicators and investigations?
Yes
Inspection Procedures
Does the inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? Obtain copy.
No
Does the inspector's process include taking photos?
No
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious potential illicit discharge indicators or maintenance issues? If so, what were they?
No
Inspection Results
Did the outfall inspection result in any work orders or maintenance requests? If so, for what issue(s)?
Yes. Maintenance, repair, and cleaning at the outfall location was discussed during the audit.
Will a follow-up outfall inspection be conducted? If so, for what reason?
Yes. Part of the outfall monitoring for permit requirements.
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher M54 Audit_20200716 Page 17 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1
Site Name:
Date and Time of Site Visit:
Town Hall dry detention pond
7/16/2020
Site Address:
SCM Type:
300 Old Cane Creek Road
Dry Detention Pond
Most Recent MS4 Inspection (Include Date and Entity):
None
Name of M54 Inspector(s) evaluated:
Most Recent M54 Enforcement Activity (Include Date):
Eric Rufa
None
Name(s) and Title(s) of Site Representative(s) Present During the Site Visit:
Name
Title
Planning Director
Eric Rufa
Observations
Site Documentation
Does the site have an operation and maintenance plan?
No
Does the site have records of annual inspections? Are they performed by a qualified individual?
No
Inspector Training/Knowledge
What type of stormwater training does the MS4 inspector receive? How often?
Stormwater DVD. No set schedule.
Did the MS4 inspector appear knowledgeable about MS4 requirements for post -construction site runoff controls?
No
Did the M54 inspector appear knowledgeable about post -construction BMPs (general purpose/function, components, O&M
requirements, etc.)?
No
Inspection Procedures
Does the M54 inspector's process include the use of a checklist or other standardized form? What format?
No
Does the MS4 inspectors process include taking photos?
No
Does the MS4 inspector's process include reviewing the site's operation and maintenance plan and records of annual inspections?
No
Does the MS4 inspector's process include walking the entire site and inspecting all points of discharge?
No
Did the MS4 inspector miss any obvious operation and maintenance deficiencies? If so, explain:
No
NCS000424_Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit_20200716 Page 18 of 19
Site Visit Evaluation: Post -Construction Stormwater Control Measure No. 1
Does the MS4 inspector's process include presenting the inspection findings to the site contact in writing?
No
Compliance/Enforcement
What, if any, enforcement actions (verbal warnings, NOV, etc.) did the inspection result in?
None
If compliance issues were identified, what timeline for correction/follow-up was provided?
Not determined.
NCS000424 Town of Fletcher MS4 Audit .20200716 Page 19 of 19