20000436 Ver 1_Complete File_20000329

\?vlL ?yS
t
r?
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
1{r{ r
1 /1 ,? es RNEo
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C.
27611-5201
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
March 10, 2000
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Field Office
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ATTENTION: Mr. Eric C. Alsmeyer.
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
000436
Subject: Johnson County, Replacement of Bridge No. 61 over Black Creek Overflow
on NC 50, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-50(2), State Project No. 8.1312001,
T.I.P. No. B-3197.
Please find enclosed three copies of the project planning report for the above
referenced project. Bridge No. 61 will be replaced at its existing location with a
reinforced concrete box culvert. The culvert will be a triple barrel culvert with each
barrel measuring 3.4 meters (11 feet) by 2.7 meters (9 feet). During construction traffic
will be maintained along an on-site detour located east of the existing roadway. In the
attached document the jurisdictional impacts were estimated to be 1.31 acres of
temporary wetland impacts and 175 feet of temporary stream impacts. During final
design we minimized these impacts and preformed a wetland delineation. Final impacts
to jurisdictional wetlands will be 0.35 acres of permanent fill, 0.90 acres of temporary fill,
and 0.55 acres of mechanized clearing.
The subject bridge is composed of 3.5 inch Asphalt wearing surface, 6.5 inch reinforced
concrete deck, continuous steel 1-beams, reinforced concrete caps, and timber piles. All
elements of the structure should be removed without dropping if possible. However, a
worse case scenario regarding the concrete deck would result in a maximum of 23-cubic
...E
ETLANDS GROUP
'"ATFR QUALITY SF_??'r?'
yards of fill in Waters of the U.S. All other elements including the asphalt wearing
surface are to be removed without dropping in the Waters of the United States.
The project is being processed by the Federal Highway Administration as a
"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). Therefore, we do not
anticipate requesting an individual permit, but propose to proceed under Nationwide
Permit 23 in accordance with the Federal Register of December 13, 1996, Part VII,
Volume 61, Number 241.
We anticipate a 401 General Certification will apply to this project, and are
providing one copy of the CE document to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their review.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Alice N.
Gordon at 733-1162.

Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: w/attachment
Mr. David Franklin, Corps of Engineers, Wilmington Field Office
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design Unit
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design Unit
Mr. D. R. Dupree, P.E., Division 4 Engineer
Mr. John Williams, P & E Project Planning Engineer
Johnston County,
Bridge No. 61 on NC 50
Over Black Creek Overflow
Federal Aid Project BRSTP - 50(2)
State Project 8.1312001
TIP Project B-3197
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
Date ?r H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
o- ty-g7 awl 1\ -A L
Date Hof, Nicholas L. Graf, P. E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Johnston County,
Bridge No. 61 on NC 50
Over Black Creek Overflow
Federal Aid Project BRSTP - 50(2)
State Project 8.1312001
TIP Project B-3197
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
October 1997
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
William T. Goodwin, Jr., P. E.
Project Planning Engineer
Way., e EW.?.
Wayne Elliott
Bridge Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head
Lubin V. Prevatt, P. E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

,,?t?ilttll!/h/JJJ
??,•? f41 GAR01 °.....° 14-1
T G00W
111??
Johnston County,
Bridge No. 61 on NC 50
Over Black Creek Overflow
Federal Aid Project BRSTP - 50(2)
State Project 8.1312001
TIP Project B-3197
1. SUMMARY OF PROJECT
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge
No. 61 in Johnston County. This bridge carries NC 50 over the Black Creek Overflow (see
Figure 1). NCDOT includes this bridge in the 1998-2004 Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) as a bridge replacement project. NCDOT and the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) classify this project as a federal Categorical Exclusion. These agencies expect no
notable environmental impacts.
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 61 in its existing location as shown in Figure 2. NCDOT
recommends replacing the bridge with a reinforced concrete box culvert. The culvert will be a
triple barreled culvert, with each barrel measuring 3.4 meters (11 feet) by 2.7 meters (9 feet). The
approach roadway will consist of a 7.2 meter (24 foot) travelway, 1.2 meter (4 foot) paved
shoulders and a total shoulder width of at least 2.4 meters (8 feet). The new roadway will be at
approximately the same elevation as the existing bridge. The completed project will provide a
design speed of approximately 100 km/h (60 mph).
The estimated cost is $ 832,000 including $ 32,000 for right of way acquisition and
$ 800,000 for construction. The estimated cost included in the 1998-2004 TIP is $440,000.
II. ANTICIPATED DESIGN EXCEPTIONS
NCDOT is not expected to need any design exceptions for this project.
III. SUMMARY OF PROJECT COMMITMENTS
All standard procedures and measures will be implemented to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts. All applicable Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be installed and
properly maintained during project construction.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344), a permit will be required from the Corps of Engineers (COE) for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into "Waters of the United States." A Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit # 23
will likely be applicable for this project.
A North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) Section 401 Water
Quality General Certification will be obtained prior to issue of the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit # 23.
Once construction of the new culvert is complete, the temporary detour will be removed.
Approach fill will be removed to natural grade and the area will be planted with native grasses
and/or tree species as appropriate.
IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS
NCDOT classifies NC 50 as a Rural Major Collector in the Statewide Functional
Classification System. The surrounding area is a mixture of residential home sites and farmland
interspersed with woodland.
Near Bridge No. 61, NC 50 is a two lane paved road with a 7.2 meter (24 foot) wide
travelway, 1.2 meter (4 foot) paved shoulders and additional grassed shoulders. Both vertical and
horizontal alignment in the area are good.
NCDOT built Bridge No. 61 in 1942. The bridge has an asphalt overlay surface on a
reinforced concrete deck on continuous steel I-beam girders. The bents and end bents are
concrete caps on timber piles. The deck of Bridge No. 61 is 4.0 meters (13 feet) above the
streambed. Water depth is approximately 1.3 meters (4.0 feet) in the project area. The bridge is
12.5 meters (41 feet) long with a 7.9 meter (25.8 foot) roadway width. It carries two lanes of
traffic and is not currently posted for single vehicles or for Truck-tractor Semi-trailer (TTST).
According to Bridge Maintenance Unit records, the sufficiency rating of Bridge No. 61 is
49.5 of a possible 100.0.
The current traffic volume is 3050 vehicles per day (VPD), projected to 6600 VPD by the
design year (2020). No speed limit is posted in the project area, therefore it is assumed to be 55
mph by statute.
Traffic Engineering accident records indicate three accidents were reported in the vicinity
of Bridge No. 61 between May 1, 1993 and April 30, 1996.
The Johnston County School Bus Transportation Coordinator has indicated that 5 busses
use this route twice a day during the school year. Detouring traffic would create some
inconvenience, but would not cause insurmountable problems in school bus operations.
2
V. ALTERNATES
One method of replacing Bridge No. 61 was studied. All other possible alternates can be
eliminated either from an economic standpoint or due to environmental impacts.
Alternate One (Recommended) - replace the bridge in the existing location with a triple
barreled reinforced concrete box culvert. Each barrel of this culvert will measure 3.4
meters (11 feet) by 2.7 meters (9 feet). Traffic will be maintained along an on-site detour
located east of the existing roadway, as shown in Figure 2.
An on-site detour to the west would result in greater environmental effects to previously
undisturbed wetlands to the west of the existing bridge. Such a detour would also result in a
potentially dangerous reverse curve situation since this section of NC 50 is on a gradual curve in
that direction. (See figure 2.)
There is not a reasonable off-site detour route considering the amount of traffic on
NC 50. The shortest detour route (3.6 miles) would generate road user costs in excess of
$ 570,000 over the approximate 5 month construction period. This cost is greater than the cost of
an on-site detour, so an alternate for road closure during construction is not reasonable.
The "do-nothing" alternate is not practical. The existing bridge would continue
deteriorating until it was unusable. This would require closing the road, or continued intensive
maintenance.
VI. COST ESTIMATE
Estimated costs of the alternates studied are as follows:
Alternate One
Recommended
Structure $ 181,000
Roadway Approaches 130,000
Detour Structure & Approaches 204,000
Structure Removal 8,000
Misc. and Mobilization 157,000
Engineering & Contingencies 120,000
Total Construction 800,000
Right of Way & Utilities 32,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 832,000
3
VII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 61 in its existing location, as shown in Figure 2. Traffic
will be maintained on an on-site detour located east of the existing bridge during construction.
NCDOT will replace Bridge No. 61 with a reinforced concrete box culvert. The culvert
will be a triple barreled culvert, with each barrel measuring 3.4 meters (11 feet) by 2.7 meters (9
feet). The approach roadway will consist of a 7.2 meter (24 foot) travelway, 1.2 meter (4 foot)
paved shoulders (to match the existing paved shoulder on NC 50) and a total shoulder width of at
least 2.4 meters (8 feet). The approach roadway improvements will extend a distance of
approximately 60 meters (197 feet) on each side of the proposed structure. The temporary detour
will be approximately 300 meters (984 feet) in length and will include three corrugated metal
pipes, each 1500 millimeters (60 inches) in diameter. The new roadway will be at approximately
the same elevation as the existing bridge. The completed project will provide a design speed of
approximately 100 km/h (60 mph).
NCDOT recommends Alternate 1 because it is the most reasonable and feasible alternate
for replacing Bridge No. 61. An alternate with an on-site detour to the west of the existing bridge
would have greater environmental effects on previously undisturbed wetlands to the west of the
existing bridge. An off-site detour would cost the traveling public significantly more than the
provision of an on-site detour. The alignment of this section of NC 50 is not substandard so
realignment is not warranted.
The Division Engineer has indicated that replacing Bridge No. 61 in-place with traffic
maintained on-site during construction would be acceptable from his perspective.
Construction of Alternate 1 will not have a substantial adverse impact on the floodplain
or associated flood hazard. The elevation of the 100-year flood will not be increased by more
than 30 centimeters (12 inches).
NCDOT expects utility conflicts to be medium or normal for a project of this type and
magnitude.
VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL. EFFECTS
A. General Environmental Effects
The project is considered to be a "categorical exclusion" due to its limited scope and
insignificant environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have a substantial adverse effect on the quality of the
human or natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
4
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
No adverse effect on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition
will be limited.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected
to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl refuges of
national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
There are no known hazardous waste sites in the project area.
B. Architectural and Archaeological Resources
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has indicated that there are no known
architectural or archaeological sites in the project area and no unknown sites are likely to be
found. Therefore, SHPO has recommended no archaeological surveys be conducted in
connection with this project. (See SHPO Letter dated 8/9/96.) However, the SHPO asked that
Bridge No. 61, which was built in 1941, be evaluated for National Register eligibility. The bridge
was evaluated and found not to be eligible for the National Register. (See Concurrence Form
dated 9/12/97.)
C. Natural Systems
Soil properties and site topography significantly influence the potential for soil erosion
and compaction, along with other possible construction limitations or management concerns.
Water resources within the project area present important management limitations due to the
need to regulate water movement and the increased potential for water quality degradation.
Excessive soil disturbance resulting from construction activities can potentially alter both the
flow and quality of water resources, limiting downstream uses. In addition, soil characteristics
and the availability of water directly influence the composition and distribution of flora and
fauna in biotic communities, thus affecting the characteristics of these resources.
Regional Characteristics
The proposed project is located in the extreme southeast of Johnston County. This portion
of the county is located in the Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
Topography in the vicinity of the study area is nearly level with wide floodplains along streams.
Project elevation is 46.0 meters (150.9 feet) above mean sea level. Soils of the project region
have formed from the various unconsolidated sediments along river terraces and on flood plains,
in the Coastal plain region.
Soils
Soils located in the project area are of the Wehadkee-Bibb-Chewacla Association. The
only soil type found in the study area is Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded (Wt). This soil type
occurs on nearly level flood plains along streams and is poorly drained. Slopes on this soil are
from 0-2 percent. Permeability is moderate and the seasonal high water table is within 30.0
centimeters (12.0 inches) of the surface. The soil is frequently flooded for brief periods and
surface runoff is slow. Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded is listed as a hydric soil.
This section contains information concerning surface water resources likely to be
impacted by the proposed project. Water resource assessments include the physical
characteristics, best usage standards, and water quality aspects of the water resources, along with
their relationship to major regional drainage systems. Probable impacts to surface water
resources are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
Best Usage Classification
Water resources within the study area are located in the Inner Coastal Plain Region
(Subbasin # 030404) of the Neuse River Drainage Basin. NC 50 crosses one perennial stream, an
unnamed tributary to Black Creek. Construction of the onsite detour will necessitate the
construction of a temporary crossing of the unnamed tributary to Black Creek on new alignment.
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ), formerly Division of Environmental Management (DEM), which reflects water quality
conditions and potential resource usage. Unnamed streams carry the same best usage
classification as the streams to which they are tributary. Black Creek [DEM Index No. 27-45-(2),
5/1/881 is classified as "C NSW". Class C refers to waters suitable for aquatic life propagation
and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture. The supplemental
classification NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) refers to waters which require limitations on
nutrient inputs. No waters classified as High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or
WS-II) or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.62 kilometers (1.00 mile) of the
project study area.
Physical Characteristics of Surface Waters
The unnamed tributary to Black Creek at NC 50 is approximately 15.0 meters (49.2 feet)
wide and 1.0 meter (3.3 feet) in depth. The substrate in the study area is composed primarily of
sand and silt. The stream flows through a Bottomland Hardwood Forest Community to the west
and a Freshwater Marsh Community to the east. Herbaceous and woody vegetation was observed
in the stream channel. The flow at the time of the site visit was negligible. (Tannin dissolved in
the water has stained it nearly black.) Tannin is released into the stream from the decay of leaves.
Mats of filamentous and blue-green algae were observed in isolated stagnant pools along the
stream course.
6
Water Quality
This section describes the water quality of the water resources within the project area.
Potential sediment loads and toxin concentrations of these waters from both point sources and
nonpoint sources are evaluated. Water quality assessments are made based on published resource
information and existing general watershed characteristics. These data provide insight into the
value of water resources within the project area to meet human needs and to provide habitat for
aquatic organisms.
General Watershed Characteristics
The proposed project is located in a watershed that is becoming increasingly urbanized.
This watershed receives both non-point source and point source input from industry, agriculture,
and residences, with no part of the watershed having high water quality (DEM, 1992). The
surrounding landscape has been experiencing unprecedented growth in the form of single family
home developments. This growth has placed a strain on the watershed's ability to absorb
pollutants and consequently maintain biodiversity. Black Creek in the project vicinity occurs
mostly in a series of wooded and clear cut tracts. The major source of pollutants to Black Creek
is likely to be sediment runoff from recently logged land and the runoff of toxic chemicals from
ongoing logging operations.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN), managed by the DWQ, is
part of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long term trends
in water quality. The program monitors ambient water quality by sampling at fixed sites for
selected benthic macroinvertebrate organisms, which are sensitive to water quality conditions.
Samples are evaluated on the number of taxa present of intolerant groups [Ephemeroptera,
Plecoptera, Trichoptera (EPT)] and assigned a taxa richness value (EPT S). Samples are also
assigned a biotic index value that summarizes tolerance data for all species in each collection.
The two rankings are given equal weight in final site classification. The biotic index and taxa
richness values primarily reflect the effects of chemical pollution and are a poor measure of the
effects of such physical pollutants as sediment. One BMAN sample site is located approximately
2.0 kilometers (1.2 miles) downstream of the study area. This site was last sampled in July of
1983 and was assigned a classification of Good-Fair. The sample sites recorded downstream of
the study area closely represent water quality conditions in the study area, since few sources of
pollution occur between the study area and the sample site.
Point Source Dischargers
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program administered by the DWQ.
All dischargers are required to register for a permit. No NPDES dischargers are listed for Black
Creek in the vicinity of the proposed project.
7
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Impacts to water resources in the project area are likely to result from activities associated
with project construction. Activities likely to result in impacts are clearing and grubbing on
streambanks, riparian canopy removal, instream construction, fertilizers and pesticides used in
revegetation, and pavement installation. The following impacts to surface water resources are
likely to result from the above-mentioned construction activities.
• Increased erosion in the project area and increased sedimentation and siltation downstream of
the crossing.
• Changes in light incidence and water clarity due to vegetation removal and increased
sedimentation.
• Alteration of water levels and flows due to interruptions and/or additions to surface and
ground water flow from construction.
• Changes in and destabilization of water temperature due to vegetation removal.
• Increased nutrient loading during construction via runoff from exposed areas.
• Increased concentrations of toxic compounds from highway runoff, construction, and toxic
spills.
• Increased potential for release of toxic compounds such as fuel and oil from construction
equipment and other vehicles.
• Alteration of stream discharge due to silt loading and changes in surface and groundwater
drainage patterns.
In order to minimize potential impacts to water resources in the project area, NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly enforced during
the construction phase of the project. Impacts can be further reduced by limiting instream
activities and revegetating stream banks immediately following the completion of grading.
Anadromous fish are a valuable resource and their migration must not be adversely
impacted. The proposed project is located in the Coastal Plain and is therefore subject to the
guidelines defined in NCDOT's Draft Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish
Passage. These guidelines detail recommendations that allow for construction that will not
impede the migration of anadromous fish species, including minimization of instream activities
during the spring migration period.
Biotic resources include terrestrial and aquatic communities. The composition and
distribution of biotic communities throughout the project area are reflective of topography, soils,
hydrology, and past and present land uses. Descriptions of the terrestrial systems are presented in
the context of plant community classifications. These classifications follow Schafale and
Weakley (1990) where possible. Representative animal species which are likely to occur in these
habitats (based on published range distributions) are also cited. Fauna observed during the site
visit are denoted in the text with an asterisk (*).
Biotic Communities
Biotic communities include terrestrial and aquatic elements. Much of the flora and fauna
described from biotic communities utilize resources from different communities, making
boundaries between contiguous communities difficult to define. Three distinct community types
were identified in the study area: a Disturbed Community, Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood
Forest (Brownwater Subtype), and Coastal Plain Semipermanent Impoundment. An unnamed
tributary to Black Creek links the aquatic components of the above mentioned communities.
Disturbed Community
The disturbed community includes the roadside shoulders and bridge approaches. This
community is maintained in an early successional state through frequent mowing and the
application of pesticides. The vast majority of the species found in this community are those that
are highly adaptable and hardy. Common species found in this community include: toad flax,
curley dock, blackberry, English plantain, fescue, Virginia creeper, winged elm, mistflower, wild
rose, daylilly, Venus' looking-glass, dwarf dandelion, sourgrass, panic grass, lespedeza, Carolina
geranium, five fingers, winged sumac, Spanish bayonet, elderberry, and evening primrose.
Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Brownwater Subtype)
The habitats found in the Bottomland Hardwood Forest vary from areas that are
permanently inundated to areas that are infrequently flooded. The frequency of flooding affects
the type and diversity of species found. Permanently and semipermanently flooded portions of
this community have a canopy composed of red maple, loblolly pine, willow oak, water oak,
sweet gum, swamp chestnut oak, and swamp tupelo. Vines such as greenbrier penetrate
throughout the understory. The understory of this community includes leucothoe, blueberry, titi,
giant cane, wax myrtle, black willow, elderberry, and viburnum. An herb layer composed
exclusively of ferns is also present in this community and includes royal fern, cinnamon fern,
southern lady fern, and sensitive fern.
Small upland hummocks occur infrequently in this community. These areas provide
habitat for species that are less tolerant of flooding. Common species observed as dominate on
hummocks are bracken fern, American holly, white oak, and swamp red oak. Purple wisteria is
an invasive vine that is quickly becoming dominate in upland openings and borders of the
community.
Coastal Plain Semipermanent Impoundment
This community has been heavily impacted by logging operations in the past. As a result
of this disturbance the vast majority of the community exists in the form of a marsh dominated
by soft rush. Several small stands of the remnant forest were also observed. Stands of trees
observed were composed of black willow, red maple, swamp tupelo, willow oak, sweet gum, and
Carolina ash. The marsh portions of the community include some saplings of the above species
and a diverse assemblage of herbs and shrubs including: blue-eyed grass, meadow beauty, tear
9
thumb, button bush, autumn olive, vaccinium, sensitive fern, royal fern, bulrush, cat tail, lizard
tail, giant cane, tag alder, and sedge.
Unnamed Tributary to Black Creek
The Black Creek Community refers to the area that is located within the main channel of
the stream. The main channel of the stream is intermittent in nature and contains a variety of
vegetation. The vegetation includes button bush, tear thumb, soft rush, black willow, bluets, and
swamp tupelo.
Wildlife
Communities that are maintained in an early successional state provide little cover for
animals in the study area. These areas do provide a significant food source for herbivores and
predators found higher up on the food chain. Butterflies, such as cabbage butterfly*, pearl
crescent*, and painted lady* are commonly seen going from flower to flower feeding on the
nectar that these plants produce. Other animals that frequently forage on roadside shoulders and
fill slopes include: black rat snake*, Fowler's toad, Carolina chickadee*, American crow*,
mourning dove*, northern cardinal*, common grackle*, eastern bluebird*, loggerhead shrike*,
song sparrow, white-tailed deer*, and eastern cottontail*.
The bottomland hardwood forest community offers considerably more opportunities for
animals than do roadside habitats. Trees and shrubs that produce fleshy fruit attract a multitude
of insects that are in turn preyed upon by yellow-throated warbler*, blue-gray gnatcatcher, white-
eyed vireo, prothonotary warbler, yellow warbler, and hooded warbler. Herps such as spotted
salamander, marbled salamander, northern dusky salamander, upland chorus frog, and southern
cricket frog* use ephemeral pools found throughout this community for breeding. Predators are
also prolific in this community and include red shouldered hawk, barred owl, gray fox, raccoon,
and bobcat. Gray squirrel and white-tailed deer feed on seeds and fruit found throughout this
community.
Most of the semipermanent impoundment community is flooded for most of the year.
Small hummocks are found interspersed in this community are the only true uplands found here.
Many species that feed on aquatic organisms are found in this community. Typical species are
bullfrog*, pickerel frog*, two-lined salamander, snapping turtle, eastern mud turtle, belted
kingfisher*, great blue heron, green heron, red wing blackbird, swamp sparrow, killdeer,
American woodcock, silverhair bat, beaver*, and hispid cotton rat.
The unnamed tributary provides a source of water for animals found throughout the study
area. Streams also function as migration corridors between communities and provide hunting
opportunities for predators. Predators that utilize this community may feed on terrestrial or
aquatic organisms. Piscine species likely to occur in this community include eastern mosquito
fish*, redfin pickerel, bowfin, American eel, satinfin shiner, swallowtail shiner, creek
chubsucker, yellow bullhead, pirate perch, mud sunfish, bluespotted sunfish, and other sunfish.
Crayfish are also common in this community.
10
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Construction of the proposed project will have various impacts on the biotic resources
described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to
impact biological functions. This section quantifies and qualifies potential impacts to the natural
communities within the project area in terms of the area impacted and the organisms affected.
Temporary and permanent impacts are considered here as well, along with recommendations to
minimize or eliminate impacts.
Impacts to Terrestrial Communities
Impacts to terrestrial communities will result from project construction due to the
clearing and paving of portions of the project area, and thus the loss of community area. Table
summarizes potential losses to these communities, resulting from project construction.
Calculated impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative abundance of each community
present in the study area. Estimated impacts are derived based on the entire proposed
right-of-way width of 24 meters (80 feet) and a project length of 305 meters (1000 feet).
However, project construction often does not require the entire right-of-way; therefore, actual
impacts may be considerably less.
Table 1. Estimated area impacts to terrestrial communities.
Disturbed Community 0.22 (0.55)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest 0.14 (0.35)
Semipermanent Impoundment 0.39 (0.96)
Total Impacts 0.75(l.9)
The projected loss of habitat resulting from construction of the proposed project will have
a minimal impact on populations of native fauna and flora. Natural communities impacted by
project construction are already disturbed to a greater or lesser extent. Permanent impacts will be
limited to the disturbed community and the edge of the bottomland hardwood forest community.
Impacts to the semipermanent impoundment community resulting from the construction of the
temporary onsite detour will be temporary since a similarly vegetated community is likely to
replace the one impacted during the construction phase of the project. Plants and animals found
in these communities are generally common throughout North Carolina and are well adapted to
persisting through disturbance. Animals temporarily displaced by construction activities should
repopulate areas of suitable habitat following project completion. Impacts to the edges of
forested communities should be avoided to the extent practicable; since this will reduce the
amount of suitable habitat available for interior species and increase opportunities for edge
species. If forested tracts become too small in area, interior species will not repopulate.
11
Impacts to Aquatic Communities
Impacts to the aquatic community of the Black Creek will result from the replacement of
Bridge No. 61. Impacts are likely to result from the physical disturbance of aquatic habitats (i.e.
substrate, water quality, stream banks). Disturbance of aquatic habitats has a detrimental effect
on aquatic community composition by reducing species diversity and the overall quality of
aquatic habitats. Physical alterations to aquatic habitats can result in the following impacts to
aquatic communities:
• Inhibition of plant growth.
• Clogging of feeding structures of filter-feeding organisms, gills of fish, and the burial of
benthic organisms.
• Algal blooms resulting from increased nutrient concentrations.
• Mortality among sensitive organisms resulting from introduction of toxic substances and
decreases in dissolved oxygen.
• Destabilization of water temperature resulting from riparian canopy removal.
• Loss of benthic macroinvertibrates through scouring resulting from an increased sediment
load.
Impacts to aquatic communities can be minimized by minimizing riparian canopy
removal, limiting instream construction, revegetation immediately following the completion of
grading activities, and strict adherence to BMP's.
This section provides inventories and impact analyses pertinent to two significant
regulatory issues: Waters of the United States and rare and protected species. These issues retain
particular significance because of federal and state mandates which regulate their protection. This
section deals specifically with the construction impact analyses required to satisfy regulatory
authority prior to project construction.
Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United
States," as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CFR) Part 328.3. Any action
that proposes to dredge or place fill material into surface waters or wetlands falls under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Surface waters include all standing or flowing waters which have
commercial or recreational value to the public. Wetlands are identified based on the presence of
hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and saturated or flooded conditions during all or part of the
growing season.
12
Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Criteria to delineate jurisdictional wetlands include evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic
vegetation and hydrology. Two wetland sites were identified in the study area. Information
regarding impacts to jurisdictional wetlands can be found in Table 2.
Wetland site 1 is located to the east of NC 50 and includes all areas within the proposed
right-of-way outside of the toe of the existing fill slope. This site occurs in the Coastal Plain
Semipermanent Impoundment Community. Hydrological characteristics at this site include soils
saturated at the surface, drainage patterns, sediment deposits, drift lines, and water stained leaves.
The soils at the sample point is a clay loam (IOYR 5/1) that is uniform in composition.
Wetland site 2 is located to the west of NC 50 and includes all areas within the proposed
right-of-way and outside of the toe of the existing fill slope. This site occurs in the Coastal Plain
Bottomland Hardwood Forest (Brownwater subtype). Hydrological indicators at the site are soils
saturated at the surface, water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and drainage patterns. Soils
exhibited mottling at a depth of 25 centimeters (10.0 inches). The clay loam has a matrix of
(IOYR) 5/2 and a mottle of (IOYR) 5/6.
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are calculated based on the linear feet of the
stream that is located within the proposed right-of-way. The unnamed tributary to Black Creek is
the only jurisdictional surface water located in the study area. Calculated temporary impacts to
jurisdictional surface waters can be found in Table 2.
Table 2. Anticipated Temporary Impacts to Jurisdictional Wetlands and Surface Waters.
;.Surtace WaWN Keptace ono.p
UT Black Creek (Area) 2668 ml (8750 ft')
UT Black Creek (linear) 53 m (175 ft)
Anticipated wetland impacts were determined using the entire right-of-way width of 24
meters (80 feet). Project construction generally does not require the entire right-of-way width,
therefore, actual wetland impacts may be considerably less. These impact assessments include
only those wetland areas directly disturbed by construction within the right-of-way, additional
wetland areas might be indirectly affected due to changes in water levels and siltation from
construction activities. It is recommended that impacts to wetlands be avoided wherever possible.
13
Permits
impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated from the proposed project. As a
result, construction activities will require permits and certifications from various regulatory
agencies in charge of protecting the water quality of public water resources
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (23) is likely to be applicable for all impacts to
Waters of the United States resulting from the proposed project. This permit authorizes activities
undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed in whole, or part, by another
Federal agency or department where that agency or department has determined that pursuant to
the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulation for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act:
• (1) that the activity, work, or discharge is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation because it is included within a category of actions which neither individually
nor cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment, and;
• (2) that the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished notice of the agency's or
department's application for the categorical exclusion and concurs with that determination.
This project will also require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to
the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act requires that the state
issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or licensed activity that may result in
a discharge to Waters of the United States. Section 401 Certification allows surface waters to be
temporarily impacted for the duration of the construction or other land manipulation. The
issuance of a 401 permit from the DWQ is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section 404 permit.
Avoidance, Minimization, Mitigation
The COE has adopted through the CEQ a wetland mitigation policy which embraces the
concepts of "no net loss of wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and
maintain the chemical, biological and physical integrity of Waters of the United States,
specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include:
avoiding impacts (to wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these three aspects (avoidance,
minimization and compensatory mitigation) must be considered sequentially.
Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting
impacts to Waters of the United States. According to a 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)
between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the COE, in determining "appropriate
and practicable" measures to offset unavoidable impacts, such measures should be appropriate to
the scope and degree of those impacts and practicable in terms of cost, existing technology and
logistics in light of overall project purposes. Impacts to Waters of the United States associated
with this project can not be avoided due to the nature of the project; the replacement of an
existing bridge.
14
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable steps to reduce the
adverse impacts to Waters of the United States. Implementation of these steps will be required
through project modifications and permit conditions. Minimization typically focuses on
decreasing the footprint of the proposed project through the reduction to median widths, right-of-
way widths and fill slopes. The detour will be designed to meet minimum safe design standards
reducing the potential amount of impacted wetlands. These impacts will be temporary since the
detour will be removed at the end of construction. The footprint of the proposed structure will be
no larger than the footprint of the existing structure.
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated impacts to Waters
of the United States have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent possible. It is
recognized that "no net loss of wetlands" functions and values may not be achieved in each and
every permit action. Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for
unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable minimization has
been achieved. Compensatory actions often include restoration, creation, and enhancement of
"Waters of the United States", specifically wetlands. Such actions should be undertaken in areas
adjacent or contiguous to the discharge site.
Compensatory mitigation is required for those projects authorized under Nationwide
Permits that result in the fill or alteration of:
• More than 0.45 hectares (1.0 acres) of wetlands will require compensatory mitigation;
• And/or more than 45.7 meters (149.9 linear feet) of streams will require compensatory
mitigation.
Written approval of the final mitigation plan is required from the DWQ. Final
permit/mitigation decisions rest with the COE.
Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either
due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human development. Federal law (under the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action likely to
adversely affect a species classified as federally-protected be subject to review by the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Other species may receive additional protection under
separate state laws.
Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under the provisions of
Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of May 2,
1997, the FWS lists three federally protected species for Johnston County. A brief description of
15
the characteristics and habitat requirements for these species along with a conclusion regarding
potential project impacts follows Table 3.
Table 3. Federally Protected Species for Johnston County.
Note:
• "E" denotes Endangered (a species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range).
• "*" denotes Historic Record (the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years
ago).
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker) Endangered
The red-cockaded woodpecker uses open old growth stands of southern pines,
particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging and nesting habitat. To be appropriate
habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker, a forested stand must contain at least 50% pine, lack a
thick understory, and be contiguous with other stands. These birds nest exclusively in trees that
are >60 years old and are contiguous with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range
of the red-cockaded woodpecker is up to 200 hectares (500 acres). This acreage must be
contiguous with suitable nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively in living pine trees and usually in trees that are
infected with the fungus that causes red-heart disease. Colonies are located in cavities from 3.6-
30.3 meters (12-100 feet) above the ground and average 9.1-15.7 meters (30-50 feet) high. They
can be identified by a large encrustation of running sap that surrounds the tree. The large
encrustation of sap is believed to be used as a defense by the red-cockaded woodpecker against
possible predators. A clan of woodpeckers usually consists of one breeding pair and the offspring
from previous years. The red-cockaded woodpecker lays its eggs in April, May, and June and
hatch 38 days later. Clutch size ranges in number from 3-5 eggs. All members of the clan share
in raising the young. Red-cockaded woodpeckers feed mainly on insects but may also feed on
seasonal wild fruits.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Forested areas in the study area contain significantly less than 50% pine trees. Therefore,
suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker is not found in the study area. A search of the
NHP database of rare species and unique habitats shows no records of the red-cockaded
woodpecker in the study area. No impacts to this species will result from the construction of the
proposed project.
16
Alasmidonta heterodon (dwarf wedge mussel) Endangered
The dwarf wedge mussel is a small mussel ranging in size from 2.5 centimeters to 3.8
centimeters in length. It's shell is distinguishable by two lateral teeth on the right half and one on
the left half. The periostracum (outer shell) is olive green to dark brown in color and the nacre
(inner shell) is bluish to silvery white.
Successful reproduction is dependent on the attachment of larval mussels to a host fish.
This mussel is sensitive to agricultural, domestic, and industrial pollutants and requires a stable
silt free stream bed with well oxygenated water to survive.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The unnamed tributary to Black Creek that is crossed by the proposed project is an
intermittent stream. Intermittent streams do not provide suitable habitat for the dwarf wedge
mussel. A search of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats shows no records of
this species in Black Creek or its tributaries in the project region. No impacts to the dwarf wedge
mussel will occur from construction of the proposed project.
Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac) Endangered
Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub that grows 0.2 to 1.0 meters
in height. The narrowly winged or wingless rachis supports 9 to 13 sessile, oblong to oblong-
lanceolate leaflets that are each 4 to 9 centimeters long, 2 to 5 centimeters wide, acute and
acuminate. The bases of the leaves are rounded and their edges are simply or doubly serrate. It
bears small flowers in a terminal, erect, dense cluster. The flowers are greenish to white in color.
Fruits, which develop from August to September on female plants, are a red densely short-
pubescent drupe, 5 to 6 millimeters across.
This plant occurs in rocky or sandy open woods. It is dependent on some sort of
disturbance to maintain the openness of its habitat. It usually grows in association with basic
soils and occurs on sand or sandy loams. It grows only in open habitat where it can get full
sunlight and it does not compete well with other species such as Japanese honeysuckle that it is
often associated with.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is found on the roadside shoulders and approaches
to the existing bridge. A thorough survey for this species was conducted by an NCDOT biologist
on May 16, 1997. No individuals of Michaux's sumac were identified in the study area. A search
of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats shows no occurrences of this species in
the vicinity of the proposed project. No impacts to Michaux's sumac will result from the
construction of the proposed project.
17
D. Air Quality and Traffic Noise
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emissions analysis (if applicable) and a project level CO analysis is not required.
If the project disposes of vegetation by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance
with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance
with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
The project will not significantly increase traffic volumes. Therefore, it will have no
significant impact on noise levels. Temporary noise increases may occur during construction.
E. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires all federal agencies or their
representatives, to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction projects on prime and
important farmland soils. These soils are determined by the US Natural Resources Conservation
Service (MRCS) based on criteria such as potential crop yield and possible level of input of
economic resources. According to the NRCS, the proposed bridge replacement will not impact
prime farmland. The project will result in the conversion of a small amount of land but the area
to be converted is wooded and void of agricultural uses. Therefore, no further consideration of
impacts to farmland is required.
18

`?of ?10RiH ?\ North Carolina Department of
Transportation
=I Division of Highways
Planning & Environmental Branch
Johnston County
Replace Bridge No. 61 on NC 50
Over Black Creek Overflow
B-3197
I Figure One
A

Y I
f O
C
V r? '

,q
u O

I i

.i.
. ? ? o w
Y, a > c u
7
,
CO O O ?'
Jm eC q b b O
o .7,
L
O
V 00 d
C M1
bA Pq
C .`~
l q 0 CC
L
.

j: :, POJ„p-•-NOU dl\ dry O ?'
f

ri
?
?F c
U

r., I

0
z
r

U
V 1 ?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Archives and History
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
August 9, 1996
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replace Bridge 61 on NC 50 over Black Creek,
Johnston County, B-3197, Federal Aid Project
BRSTP-50(2), State Project 8.1312001, ER 96-
9199
Dear Mr. Graf:
We regret staff was unable to attend the scoping meeting for the above project on
July 25, 1996. However, Debbie Bevin met with Bill Goodwin of the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) on August 7, 1996, to discuss the
project and view the project photographs and aerial.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, the only structure over fifty years of
age within the general project area is Bridge #61, which was built in 1941. We
recommend that an architectural historian with NCDOT evaluate the bridge for
National Register eligibility and report the findings to us. We recommend no further
historic architectural survey for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend that
no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ?j(?
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
0'1??
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw?
cc: +-FI. F. Vick
C. Bruton
T. Padgett
Federal Aid # BRSTP-50(2) TIP # B-3197 County: Johnston
CONCURRENCE FORM FOR PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 61 on NC 50 over Black Creek Overflow
On September 11, 1997, representatives of the
® North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
[Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
® North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
Scoping meeting
® Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
Other
All parties present agreed
F1 there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects.
® there are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
® there are properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effects, but based
on the historical information available and the photographs of each property, the property
identified as Bridge #61 is considered not eligible for the National Register and no further
evaluation of it is necessary.
® there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effects.
Signed:
NCDOT
JIM
HW for the Divis
Administrator, or other Federal Agency
1/ /957
Date
Date
Representative, SHPO I Date
L I, y z
State Historic Preservation Officer D to
If a survey report is prepared. a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.
dA 5U7(v
r?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
October 12, 2000
State Project: 8.1312001 (B-3197)
F. A. No.: BRSTP-50(2)
County: Wayne
Description: Bridge #61 over Black Creek Overflow & Approaches on NC 50 North of
Benson
SUBJECT: PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
Mrs. Lori Allen
President
Allen Grading Company, Inc.
PO Draw 1838
Goldsboro, NC 27533
Dear Mrs. Allen:
Per your telephone conversation with our office, the preconstruction conference for this
project is being scheduled for Thursday, October 26, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. The conference
will be held in the Conference Room at the Wilson Division Office. Our office is located at
509 Ward Boulevard in Wilson, NC.
Please be prepared to present the following documents at this conference: progress schedule,
letter naming persons authorized to sign Supplemental Agreements, and letter naming your
Company EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer.
We look forward to meeting with you at the above time.
Cordially yours,
WC(
Wendi L. Oglesby, PE
Division Construction Engineer
/j
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Allen Grading Company
October 12, 2000
Page 2
c: John Wadsworth (FHWA)
Dr. Garland Pardue (US Fish & Wildlife)
Mike Bell (US Army Corps of Engineers)
John Hennessy (NC DEHNR)
Floyd Williams (DEHNR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Sprint
Carolina Power & Light
ec: John Alderman
Judith Johnson (NCWRC)
Willie Bryant
Cecil L. Jones, PE
Ted Sherrod
Tom Turnage
Bryant Bunn, III, PE
John Rouse, PE
Andy Pridgen
Jim Grady, Jr., PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Mike Mckeel, PE
Jimmy M. Lynch, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Steve DeWitt, PE
W. D. Johnson
W. L. Moore, I I I
Jimmy Mader
Robin Little
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Aydren Flowers
David R. Henderson, PE
Richard Chrisawn
Bill Gilmore, PE
John Alford, PE
T. V. Rountree, PE

r

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ?w j'
ifi.'lT „ .
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
November 22, 2000
State Project: 8.1312001 (B-3197)
F. A. Number: BRSTP-50(2)
Contract: C105488
County: Johnston
Description: Bridge No. 61 over Black Creek Overflow & Approaches on NC 50 North of Benson
MEMORANDUM TO: Steven D. DeWitt, PE
State Construction Engineer
FROM: Wendi L. Oglesby, PE W40?
Division Construction Eng'
SUBJECT: Approved Preconstruction Conference Minutes
We are transmitting an approved copy of the minutes covering the preconstruction conference for
the above project, which was held on October 26, 2000. The minutes were approved by the
Contractor, Allen Grading Company, as recorded.
Attachment
C John Wadsworth (FHWA)
Dr. Garland Pardue (US Fish & Wildlife)
Mike Bell (US Army Corps of Engineers)
John Hennessy (NC DEHNR)
Floyd Williams (DEHNR, Land Quality Section)
David Cox (NCWRC)
Ron Sechler (National Marine Fisheries)
Sprint
Carolina Power & Light
Willie Bryant
EC John Alderman
Judith Johnson (NCWRC)
Cecil L. Jones, PE
Ted Sherrod
Tom Turnage

MUM
Post Office Box 3165, Wilson, North Carolina 27895-3165
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Steve D. Dewitt, PE
November 22, 2000
Page 2
Bryant Bunn, 111, PE
John Rouse, PE
Andy Pridgen
Jim Grady, Jr., PE
Lloyd Johnston, Jr.
Mike Mckeel, PE
Jimmy M. Lynch, PE
Victor Barbour, PE
Steve DeWitt, PE
W. D. Johnson
W. L. Moore, III
Jimmy Marler
Robin Little
Warren Walker, PE
Haywood Daughtry, PE
John Williamson
Aydren Flowers
David R. Henderson, PE
Richard Chrisawn
Bill Gilmore, PE
John Alford, PE
T. V. Rountree, PE
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE MINUTES
State Project: 8.1312001 (B-3197)
F. A. Number: BRSTP-50(2)
County: Johnston
Description: Bridge No. 61 over Black Creek Overflow & Approaches on NC 50 North of Benson
The preconstruction conference for the above project was held in the Wilson Division office Conference Room on October 26, 2000,
with the following persons in attendance:
NAME REPRESENTING
Andy Pridgen QA Lab
Landis Toole Selma RE Office
Jeff Allen Assistant RE - Selma
Mike Mckeel Resident Engineer - Selma
Randall Gatties Sanford Contractors
Mark Perkins Sanford Contractors
Cheryl Anderson Allen Grading Company
Chuck Allen Allen Grading Company
David Allen Allen Grading Company
Brandy Carter Right of Way - Utilities
Robin Little Div. Environmental Officer
Lloyd Johnson Right of Way
Ms. Wendi Oglesby, PE, Division Construction Engineer, presided over the conference. She asked everyone present to introduce
themselves and their project affiliation.
The Contractor presented a letter advising names of persons authorized to sign supplemental agreements in conjunction with this
project.
Mr. Jerry Best will act as Project Superintendent and Traffic Control Coordinator for the Contractor.
Mr. Dana Cooper will act as Project Inspector and Traffic Control Coordinator for the DOH.
Ms. Oglesby asked when and where does the Contractor plan to begin work. The Contractor advised they plan to begin work on
November 6'h and will start with his clearing operation.
RIGHT OF WAY
At this point, Ms. Oglesby asked Mr. Lloyd Johnson to cover the right of way for this project. Mr. Johnson advised all right of way
necessary of the project had been acquired.
There is no know asbestos contamination, soil contamination or underground storage tanks within the right of way of the project.
There are no Section 200 items on this project.
He reminded the Contractor not to exceed the right of way or easement areas during construction of the project without written
permission from the property owner.
UTILITY CONFLICTS
Mike Mckeel and Brandy Carter covered utility conflicts in conjunction with the project on page 72 of the contract.
Ms. Carter advised the following utility companies have facilities that will be in conflict with the construction of this project:
1. Carolina Power & Light - They have already moved their lines.
2. Sprint - They will move their conflicts prior to construction beginning.
Ms. Oglesby asked if there were any further questions and/or comments concerning right-of-way, erosion control or utility conflicts.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 2
EEO - DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
Ms. Oglesby covered EEO requirements relating to DBE's on pages 5 thru 15, calling attention to the following:
The Contractor's EEO Officer and Minority Liaison Officer is Cheryl Anderson.
Ms. Anderson ask if Allen Grading Company would be required to adhere to these requirements, since their company was register as a
WB. Ms. Oglebby stated she would determine the answer to the question and relay this information in the minutes. Allen Grading
Company will be required to meet all the DBE requirements as outlined in the Contract. Further as of January of this year, Allen
Grading Company DBE certification with NCDOT has expired.
The Resident Engineer furnished the Contractor with required posters for his bulletin board. The Contractor's EEO Policy Statement
is to be posted on the projects Bulletin Board which should be weather proof along with the following posters:
1. Davis-Bacon Minimum Prevailing Wage Rate Schedule,
2. "Wage-Rate Information -F/A/ Project", Form PR-1495,
3. "Notice Relating to False Statements," Form PR-1022,
4. EEO Poster - Discrimination is Prohibited".
The Contractor is urged to document, in writing, all actions taken in complying with Equal Opportunity of Employment Provisions,
Training Provision, and Minority Business Enterprise Provision. This includes applicant referrals, meeting with employees, on-site
inspections, wage evaluation, etc.
All alleged discriminatory violations should be brought to the attention of the RE.
A Contract Compliance Review will be conducted by the State and or FHWA sometime during the life of this contract. Therefore, fair
employment practice should be maintained at all time. Women should not be discriminated against.
DBE goals for this contract are established at 10.0% and were awarded with a 10.5 % for DBE's.
All subcontractors and suppliers are responsible for meeting the same requirements as the prime contractor, and it is the prime
contractor's responsibility to oversee that both are in compliance.
Prompt Payment - Contractor at all levels shall within 7 calendar days of receipt of monies, resulting from work performed on the
project or services rendered, pay subcontractors, second tier subcontractors, or material suppliers, as appropriate.
This provision for prompt payment shall be incorporated into each subcontract or second tier subcontract issued for work performed on
this project or for services provided.
Failure of any entity to make prompt payment as defined herein may result in: 1) withholding of money due to that entity in the next
partial payment until such assurances are made satisfactory to this provision; or 2) removal of an approved contractor from the
prequalified bidders list or the removal of other entities from the approved subcontractors list.
When payments are made to Disadvantage Business Enterprise firms, including material suppliers, Contractors at all levels shall
provide the Engineer with an accounting of said payments.
EROSION CONTROL
Ms. Oglesby cover erosion control items listed on pages 71, and 73-83 in the contract.
Response for Erosion Control - It was pointed out that the quantity of responses for erosion control to be paid for will be the actual
number of times the erosion control contractor moves onto the project to perform work related to any of the items listed and provided
items A thru E apply.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 3
The kinds of seed and fertilizer, rate of application of seed, fertilizer and limestone. During period of overlapping dates, the kind of
seed to be used shall be determined by the Engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre (kilogram per hectare). On cut and fill slopes 2
or steeper add 309 (35kg) Sericea Lespedeza January I-December 31.
Fertilizer shall be 10-20-20.
Temporary Seeding - Sweet Sudan Grass, German Millet or Browntop Millet shall be used in summer months and Rye Grain during
the remainder of the year.
Fertilizer Topdressing - Fertilizer used for topdressing on all roadway areas except slopes 2:1 and steeper shall be 10-20-20 and shall
be applied at the rate of 500# per acre (560 kg per hectare). Fertilizer used for topdressing on slopes 2:1 and steeper and waste and
borrow areas shall be 16-8-8 grade and shall be applied at the rate of 500# per acre (560 kg per hectare).
Supplemental Seeding-No centipede seed will be used in the seed mix for supplemental seeding. A clodbuster (ball and chain) may
be used where degree of slope prevents the use of a sod seeder.
Mowing - Minimum mowing height on this project shall be 4-inches (100 mm).
Crimping Straw Mulch: Crimping will be required on this project adjacent to any section of roadway where traffic is to be maintained
or allowed during construction. In areas within 6 feet (2 meters) of the edge of pavement, straw is to be crimped and then immediately
tacked with asphalt tack. In lieu of asphalt tack, crimping of straw will be permitted on this project subject to the conditions noted on
page 75. Straw mulch should be of sufficient length and quality to withstand the crimping operation and provide adequate ground
cover. Crimping equipment including power source shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer.
Reforestation - Reforestation will be planted once the temporary detour is removed. See the reforestation detail sheet and plan sheets.
Seasonal limitations: Seedlings shall be planted from November 15 through March 15.
Seedlings shall be planted as soon as practical following permanent Seeding & Mulching and shall be planted in a 16 ft. (5 meters)
wide swath adjacent to mowing pattern line.
Waste Areas and Borrow Sources - Payment for temporary erosion control measures, except those made necessary by the Contractor's
own negligence or for his own convenience, will be paid for at the appropriate contract unit price for the devices or measures utilized
in borrow sources and waste areas.
No additional payment will be made for erosion control devices or permanent seeding and mulching in any commercial borrow or
waste pit. Mr. Allen stated he would be using a commericial borrow and waste pit.
Special Stilling Basin(s) -Contractor may use a silt bag. Silt bags are available at no cost.
Sodding (Centipede) - Contractor shall place sod under all guiderail and all guardrail sections, and it shall be placed so that there is
symmetry between the portion of the sod behind the guardrail post and in front of the face of the guardrail. No sod shall be placed
where suitable stands of centipede exist.
The Contractor shall obtain a certificate of limited permit issued by the NC Department of Agriculture stating that the sod has been
found to be free of injurious plant pests.
Mr. Sherrod reviewed the requirements for soil preparation where sodding is to be done. Mr. Sherrod reminded the Contractor that he
is responsible for taking sufficient soil samples (at least one sample per planting area or mile, which ever is less) for testing by the
Department of Agriculture Soil Testing Division to determine the soil pH. These samples shall be taken in the presence of the
Engineer, and results shall be received by the Engineer from the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Sod handling and placement shall be a continuous process of cutting, transporting and installing without appreciable delays. It shall
always be installed within 48 hours after being cut and shall be watered within 2 hours of installation.
After sod has been placed and staked (where necessary), it shall then be rolled or tamped carefully and firmly. Metal Staples, 12" (305
MM) long, shall be made of I 1 gauge (3.0 MM diameter) new steel wire so as not to bend when pinned or driven through the sod.
Shorter staples may be used with approval of the Engineer. The Contractor shall take extreme care to prevent the installed sod from
being torn or displaced. After rolling or tamping, it shall be watered thoroughly so that the tmderside of the new sod pad and soil
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 4
immediately below the sod is completely wet. In no case shall the time interval between sod placement and initial watering exceed 2
hours.
The Contractor shall be responsible for all watering and other maintenance required maintaining the health and livability of the sod
from installation until completion of the 60-day observation period. Water requirements are noted in the contract.
The Contractor shall maintain responsibility for the sod for a 60-day observation period beginning upon the satisfaction completion
and acceptance of all work required in the plans. In Wayne County the 60 day observation period for sod installation between
September 30 and March 1, shall not begin until March 1.
The Contractor shall be responsible for year round watering and other maintenance required to maintain the livability of the sod.
After the first 30 days of the 60-day observation period, the Contractor and the Engineer shall meet to review the project and identify
dead or damaged sod to be replaced.
At the end of the 60 day observation period, the sod furnished and installed under this contract must be in a living and healthy
condition.
Larry Holland requested the Contractor advise him the day before watering, so he will be sure to have an inspector present. Any
watering done not in the presence of an inspector will be considered unauthorized work.
Environmentally Sensitive Areas - The "Environmentally Sensitive Area" shall be defined as a 50' (16 meter) buffer zone on both
sides of the stream measured from top of stream bank. Contractor may perform clearing but grubbing cannot be performed until
Contractor begins grading operations. Erosion control devices shall be installed immediately following the clearing operation.
ASPHALT PAVEMENTS
Quality Management System for Asphalt Pavements (Superpave Version) - Ms. Oglesby asked Mr. Andy Pridgen, Division QA
Supervisor to cover the Special Provisions outlined on pages 23 through the top of 41 and 54-66.
The Contractor advised that Wooten would perform the paving on the project. Mr. Pridgen advised that this subcontractor was very
familiar with the current specifications. Mr. Pridgen asked if Wooten would like to change to the current specification for Superpave,
to let him know.
He advised the Contractor, should he have any questions please contact him.
Ms. Oglesby asked everyone turn to page 1 of the contract, and the following was discussed:
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL
Ms. Oglesby advised, any of the special provisions that are not covered will be as stipulated.
Contract Time and Liquidated Damages: The date of availability for this contract is October 30, 2000 except that work in jurisdictional
waters and wetlands shall not begin until a meeting between the DOT, Regulatory Agencies, and the Contractor is held as stipulated in
the permits. The delay in availability has been considered in determining the contract time for this project. Ms. Oglesby advised the
permits for this project would be covered at the preconstruction conference; therefore, a separate meeting will not have to be held for
permits.
The contract completion date is December 30, 2001.
Liquidated Damages - $200.00 per calendar day.
When the Special Provisions require observation periods, they are not a part of the work to be completed by the completion date and/or
intermediate contract times stated in the contract. Should an observation period extend beyond the final completion date, the
acceptable completion of the observation period shall be a part of the work covered by the performance and payment bonds.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 5
Intermediate Contract Time Number 1 and Liquidated Damages -- Except for that work required under the Project Special Provisions
entitled "Planting" and/or "Reforestation", the Contractor will be required to complete all work included in this contract, place and
maintain traffic on same by September 1, 2001.
Date of Availability for this intermediate contract time is October 30, 2000 and liquidated damages are in the amount of $400.00 per
calendar day.
Upon apparent completion of all work required to be completed by this intermediate date, a final inspection will be held and upon
acceptance, the DOT will assume responsibility for the maintenance of all work except "Planting" and/or "Reforestation". The
Contractor shall be responsible for and shall make corrections of all damages to the completed roadway caused by his planting
operations, whether occurring prior to or after placing traffic thru the project.
Intermediate Contract Time Number 2 and Liquidated Damages - The Contractor shall not close or narrow a lane of traffic on NC 50,
detain and/or alter the traffic flow on or during holidays, holiday weekends, special events, or any other time when traffic is unusually
heavy, including the schedule listed in the contract.
Time of availability for this intermediate contract work shall be the time the Contractor begins to install all traffic control devices for
daytime and nighttime lane closures and the intermediate completion time shall be the time the Contractor is required to complete the
removal of all traffic control devices for daytime and nighttime lane closures and place traffic in a two-lane, two-way pattern.
Liquidated damages are $500.00 per hour.
Recruitment of Department Employees - Ms. Oglesby reviewed the requirements and reminded the Contractor if he did not comply
with these special provisions it may be justification for disqualifying him from further bidding.
Schedule of Estimated Completion Progress - The Contractor was advised if he anticipated accelerating the progress shown, he should
submit a request, and approval would have to be obtained should he want payment for performing work beyond that progress noted.
Eighty-nine percent of the work is to be completed in Fiscal Year 2001 and 11% in Fiscal Year 2002.
The Contractor presented his progress schedule which will be checked and he will be advised if satisfactory. By copy of these minutes,
we are advising the Contractor that his progress schedule has been checked and is approved as submitted.
She reminded the Contractor, should he accelerate his progress a revised progress schedule would need to be submitted for approval.
Domestic Steel & Iron Products - The Contractor was advised he can use only 0.1% of the contract amount of $2,500.00 whichever is
greater, of foreign steel in the project, except fasteners which will be domestically produced.
US Department of Transportation Hotline - To report bid rigging call 1-800-424-9071.
Submission of Records - Federal Aid Projects - This project is not located on the National Highway System, therefore, federal form
FHWA-47 is not required.
Subsurface Information - Subsurface information is available on this project.
Plant Pest Quarantines - The Contractor shall obtain a certificate or limited permit issued by the NC Department of Agriculture/US
Department of Agriculture for any regulated article used on this project originating in a quarantined county, and the certificate shall
accompany the article when it arrives at the project site. Ms. Oglesby called attention to items 1 thru 9 listed in the contract, which
may contain the plant pests quarantined.
Recycled Products or Solid Waste Materials - The Contractor is encouraged to come up with a way to utilize recycled products or solid
waste materials into the construction of the project, and he should submit to the Resident Engineer for review and if approved a
supplemental agreement will be executed.
Clearing and Grubbing - Clearing and grubbing shall be by Method III.
Restrictions on Construction of Embankment - Contractor shall construct the embankments between DET 15+25 and 17+00 to the
finished graded roadway section and will not be allowed to begin any work on the embankment for a period of 60 consecutive calendar
days.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 6
Price Adjustment - Asphalt Cement for Plant Mix -The base price index for asphalt cement for plant mix is $183.13 per ton.
Flowable Fill - Contractor advised he does not plan on using.
Shoulder and Fill Slope Material - Construct top 6" (150 mm) of shoulder & fill slopes with soils capable of supporting vegetation.
Soil shall have a P.I. greater than 6 and less than 25 and with a pH ranging from 5.5 to 6.8. All soil is subject to test & rejection by the
Engineer. Remove stones and other foreign material 2" (50 mm) or larger in diameter.
PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS
ROADWAY
Temporary Detours -Ms. Oglesby reviewed materials that are to be stockpiled for pick up by State Forces, materials that shall remain
the property of the Contractor and removed from the project.
Side Drain Pipe - Concrete, Corrugated steel, or HDPE smooth lined corrugated plastic pipe allowed.
Guardrail Anchor Units, Type 350 - Installation shall be performed in accordance with the details in the plans and details and
assembling instructions furnished by the manufacturer.
CULVERT
Mr. Mckeel covered this portion of the contract. The following was pointed out:
Adhesively Anchored Anchor Bolts or Dowels - Contractor shall submit to the Engineer for review, comments and acceptance, a
description of the proposed adhesive bonding system.
The procedures for drilling holes into concrete, drilling equipment, diameter of the drilled hole, procedures to be followed immediately
after completion of drilling holes, and checking each hole with a depth gauge to ensure proper embedment depth.
Concrete spalled or otherwise damaged by the Contractor's operations shall be repaired in a satisfactory manner.
Each hole shall be inspected by the Contractor immediately prior to the placement of adhesive and anchor bolts/dowels, and any hole
found to deviate from the requirements must be reworked by whatever means to ensure an acceptable hole.
Adhesive shall be mixed in strict conformance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Each anchor bolt/dowel shall be free of all rust, grease, oil and other contaminants, and unless otherwise shown on the plans, the
minimum embedment depth of the anchor bolt/dowel shall be such that the adhesive develops at least 125% of the yield load of the
anchor bolt/dowel as determined by the manufacturer.
Anchor bolts/dowels shall not be disturbed while adhesive is hardening.
The Contractor shall test the installed anchor bolts/dowels for adequacy of the adhesive as specified in the contract when specified on
the plans.
For the calibrated hydraulic centerhole jack system to be used for testing, the jack shall have been calibrated by an approved testing
agency within 6 months prior to starting the testing, and the Contractor shall supply the Engineer with a certificate of calibration.
The Contractor shall be required to field test 10% of the first 50 anchor bolts/dowels in the presence of the Engineer prior to installing
any additional anchors. After receiving satisfactory results from these tests, the Contractor may proceed with installing the remaining
anchors. A minimum of 2% of the remaining anchors shall be tested as previously noted.
Data for each anchor bolt/dowel tested shall be recorded by the Contractor on the report form entitled "Installation Test Report of
Adhesively Anchored Anchor Bolts or Dowels". This form can be obtained from the NC DOT Materials & Tests Engineer. The
Contractor shall submjt a copy of the completed report forms to the Engineer.
Final acceptance of the adhesively anchored system will be based on the conformance of the pull test to the requirements of this
specification. Failure tQ meet the criteria of this specification will be grounds for rejection.
Preconstruction Conference Minutes
B-3197
Page 7
The Contractor has the option of submitting a design for a precast reinforced box culvert in lieu of a cast-in-place culvert, where
indicated on the plans. Mr. Mckeel asked if the Contractor plans to use the cast-in-place culvert. The Contractor advised they did not
know at this time, but believed so.
Copies of Submittal of Working Drawings shall be submitted as indicated on pages 92-95. One complete copy of the submittal,
including all attachments, shall be furnished to the Resident Engineer. The Resident Engineer may request additional copies of any
submittal. At the same time, the following number of copies shall be submitted directly to the Structure Design Unit.
PERMITS
Ms. Oglesby advised the US Army Corps of Engineer and DEHNR has issued a permit for this project and the Contractor shall comply
with all applicable permit conditions during construction of this project.
Agents of the permitting authority will periodically inspect the project for adherence to the permits.
Should the Contractor propose to utilize construction methods (such as temporary structures or fill in waters and/or wetlands for haul
roads, work platforms, cofferdams, etc.) not specifically identified in the permit (individual, general or nationwide) authorizing the
project it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to coordinate with the appropriate permit agency to determine what, if any, additional
permit action is required. The Contractor shall also be responsible for initiating the request for the authorization of such construction
method by the permitting agency. The request shall be submitted through the Engineer. The Contractor shall not utilize the
construction method until it is approved by the permitting agency. The request normally takes approximately 60 days to process;
however, no extensions of time or additional compensation will be granted for delays resulting from the Contractor's request for
approval or construction methods not specifically identified in the permit.
She stated even though this is a Nationwide Permit the Contractor should contain his work within the footprint shown on the plans.
Any deviation would be in violation of the permits. The permit does not cover waste or borrow within wetlands.
All standard procedures will be implemented to avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
Work will be accomplished so that wet concrete does not contact stream water. This will lessen the chance of altering the stream's
water chemistry and causing a fish kill.
Ms. Oglesby advised the Contractor he and his personnel should make themselves familiar with the conditions stipulated in the
permits.
GENERAL
The Contractor was reminded of the requirement that they could only subcontractor out work, such that they perform work amounting
to not less than 40% of the total original contract less specialty items and items sublet to a DBE. In any event the Contractor may not
sublet more than 35% work less specialty items.
Mr. Mckeel advised the importance of Safety and reminded the Contractor to follow only applicable safety procedures.
There were no further questions and/or comments and the meeting was adjourned.
rADfPQ COMPANY, INC.
ALL t
BY:
DATE APPROVED NAME AND TITLE
11/8/2000