20160847 Ver 3_Baseline Monitoring Report_20200722

ID#* 20160847 Version* 3
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 07/23/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 7/22/2020
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream Pr Wetlands r- Buffer r` Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Katie Webber
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20160847
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DIMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Cloud & Banner
County: Alamance
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*3
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Cloud & Banner Baseline Monitoring Report.pdf 17.02MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Ryan Medric
Signature:*

pres
July 22, 2020
Samantha Dailey
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3600 Glenwood Avenue. Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
RE: Cloud & Banner As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report (SAW-2016-02451)
Please find attached the Cloud & Banner As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report. Stream
construction and planting was completed in April 2020. Monitoring of the 14 permanent vegetation
plots and six random vegetation plots was also completed in April 2020. There were an average
of 937 planted stems per acre in the permanent vegetation plots, 890 planted stems per acre in
the random plots, and 923 planted stems per acre across all plots. The 14 cross sections were
also surveyed in April 2020.
One change was made to UT2-C that affected as -built stream lengths. Channel design was
revised to prevent impacts to an adjacent parcel after a verbal agreement for a temporary
construction easement with the property owner could not be finalized into writing due to
unforeseen concerns from the adjacent property owner. RES therefore revised the design to
eliminate the need for a temporary construction easement by realigning the stream to meet Back
Creek without grading on the adjacent property owner's parcel. This change increased the length
of UT2-C in the easement by 84 linear feet and eliminated an impact to Wetland F, preserving
0.02 acre of wetlands.
Overall, the net difference in stream lengths between mitigation plan and as -built was an increase
of 71 linear feet. After running the Non -Standard Buffer Width Tool on the as -built, the total project
stream credits increased by 78. Project wetland credits remained the same as proposed in the
mitigation plan: 8.20 acres. RES herby requests to use the as -built credit yield for this site instead
of Mitigation Plan as the changes were due to design considerations and not a result of
construction or survey inconsistencies. As needed, RES will submit a modification letter in
coordination with the USACE project manager for IRT review to support this request. If needed,
RES will submit a modification letter in coordination with the USACE Project Manager for IRT
review, that asks for as -built credits to be used for the project due to the changes being caused
by design considerations rather than construction or survey.
RES is requesting Credit Release #2 as outlined in the mitigation plan, which includes a 15%
stream credit release (629.2 SMUs) and a release of 15% of re-establishment and enhancement
wetland credits (1.08 WMUs) for the completion of the as -built report. Please see the enclosed
credit release timeline, an updated credit ledger, and as -built report.

CLOUD AND BANNER
MITIGATION PROJECT
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SA W-2016-02451
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN (03030002)
AS -BUILT BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
Provided by: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
fires
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1056
July 2020

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 2
StreamSuccess Criteria................................................................................................................... 2
WetlandSuccess Criteria................................................................................................................. 3
VegetationSuccess Criteria............................................................................................................. 3
1.4 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 3
1.5 Design/Approach.......................................................................................................................4
Stream.............................................................................................................................................. 4
Wetland............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 6
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO)................................................................................. 6
Vegetation........................................................................................................................................ 6
StreamGeomorphology................................................................................................................... 7
StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................ 7
WetlandHydrology.......................................................................................................................... 7
2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 7
3.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 8
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7a: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 7b: Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Baseline Cross -Section Plots
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9: Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: As -Built Plan Sheets
Cloud & Banner As -Built Survey
Cloud & Banner As -Built Redlines

1.0 Proiect Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Cloud and Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project (the Project) is located within a watershed
dominated by agricultural, forested and low -density residential land use in eastern Alamance County, North
Carolina, approximately three miles north of Mebane. The Project streams and wetlands were significantly
impacted by hydrologic alterations and agricultural practices. The Project involves the restoration and
protection of streams and wetlands in the Haw River Subwatershed of the Jordan Lake watershed, in the
Cape Fear River Basin. The Project consists of stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation on a
segment of Back Creek and several tributaries that drain directly to Back Creek. The Project presents 8,150
linear feet of Stream Restoration generating 4,238 Stream Mitigation Units (SMU), and 18.05 acres of
wetland mitigation generating 8.20 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs). A combination of Priority 1 and
Priority 2 Restoration, Levels I, II, and III Enhancement, and Preservation were applied to stream reaches
in the project area. Benefits include storing excess water during flood events, preventing erosion of stream
banks, reducing in -stream sedimentation, and removing nutrients. SMU totals were adjusted using the most
recent non-standard buffer width guidance documents.
The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin, within Cataloging Unit USGS HUC 03030002, 14-
digit USGS Hydrologic Code 03030002030070. The current State classification for Back Creek is Water
Supply -II (WS-II), High Quality Waters (HQW), and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) (NCDWQ, 2011).
The Project's total easement area is 59.76 acres. The main hydrologic features include Back Creek and four
Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to Back Creek; UT2, UT4, UT5, and UT6. There are also six areas of wetland
mitigation.
The stream design approach for the Project combined the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The
analog method involves the use of a "template" stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same
location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the features
of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are similar
between the design and analog reaches. Hydraulic geometry was developed using analytical methods in an
effort to identify the design discharge.
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring
period, or until performance standards are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review
Team (IRT), the Project will be transferred to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). UP2S will be responsible for
periodic inspection of the Project to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the
deed restriction document(s) are upheld.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Project was identified as a stream and wetland restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat,
and hydrology within the Cape Fear River Basin. This project provides SMUs and WMUs to be applied as
compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to waters of the United States under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (33 U.S.0 1344) and support the goal of "no net loss" of aquatic resources in the United
States. The principal goal of this project is to address degraded water quality and nutrient input stressors
identified in the 2009 Cape Fear RBRP. The project goals and related objectives are outlined below.
Cloud & Banner 1 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

Project goals include:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non -erosive stable channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows and
connection to the floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation;
• Restore and enhance wetland hydrology and soils;
• Restore appropriate riparian and wetland plant communities;
• Preserve high quality stream and wetland resources
Project goals are addressed through the following objectives:
• Designed and reconstructed stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension, and profile
based on reference reach conditions;
• Added in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depth to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduced bank height ratios and increased entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increased forested riparian buffers to at least fifty feet on both sides of the channel along the project
reaches with an appropriate riparian plant community;
• Raised stream bed elevations adjacent to wetland restoration and enhancement areas, plugged
surface ditches, and planted native wetland plant species;
• Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project to protect wetlands, stream channels
and their associated buffers in perpetuity
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot data
will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream and wetland hydrology data and visual monitoring
will be reported annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be little change in as -built cross -sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross -sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross -sections on a given
restored reach. Channel stability should be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events
documented in the seven-year monitoring period.
Cloud & Banner 2 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document at least intermittent surface flow. This will be
accomplished through direct observation and the use of flow gauges. Intermittent reaches must demonstrate
a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow. Flow gauges were installed on UT4, UT2-C, and UT6-A.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should
not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth.
Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A
series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Wetland Success Criteria
The NRCS has a current Wetlands (WETS) table for Alamance County upon which to base a normal rainfall
amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data station was determined to be the WETS
station for Burlington Fire Station 95, NC. The growing season for Alamance County is 244 days long,
extending from March 16 to November 15, and is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28
degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years.
Based upon field observation across the Project, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation to actual
site conditions in areas of the site. Most of the soils at the Project are most similar to the local alluvial land
map unit. Mitigation guidance for Common Piedmont Soil Series does not list local alluvial land, but
suggests for a Typic Endoaquults a hydroperiod of 10 to 12 percent during which the water table is within
12 inches of the surface during the growing season. Hydric soils documented throughout the Project are
most like the Typic Endoaquults of Local alluvial land where the soils are characterized by having a clayey
(argillic) horizon. Depressional areas will have longer hydroperiods due to storage capacity.
Based on the mitigation guidance, hydrologic success for these soils is greater than 10 percent saturation
during the growing season.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site follow
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of
two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring shall occur annually between July 15 and leaf drop.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the site are the survival of at least 320 planted three-year
old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year old trees that are at least 7 feet tall at the end of Year
5, and the final vegetative success criteria is 210 trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the
end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are to be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly
monitoring reports, but do not count towards the success criteria of total planted stems unless they have
been in the plot for more than two years.
1.4 Project Components
The summarized credits below reflect the as -built conditions of the site. Following Mitigation Plan
approval, a design change was made to UT2-C that resulted in more of the creditable channel being aligned
within the easement area. This change is detailed further in the Section 1.6. RES would like to request to
use the as -built crediting scheme for this project in replacement of the mitigation plan credits as changes
were caused by design considerations rather than construction or survey. If needed, RES will submit a
mitigation plan modification request letter in coordination with the USACE Project Manager and IRT
Cloud & Banner 3 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

review. The net difference between Mitigation Plan and As -Built stream credits is an increase of 78 SMUs
with wetland credits remaining the same. Project credits are detailed more in Table 1; Appendix A. Figure
2 displays design centerline with as -built top of bank to compare how streams were built as they were
designed. The constructed alignment is very close to the design.
The Cloud and Banner Project Mitigation Credits
Summary of Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Totals
4,238
8.20
N/A
1. S Design/Approach
Stream
Back Creek
Enhancement Level II and Preservation were used along Back Creek to address existing impairments,
particularly, floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, and buffer degradation. The watershed that drains through
the project is approximately 14.52 square miles, and land use is primarily forested and agricultural. The
project addresses limited instream habitat and bank erosion by grading existing banks to reestablish bankfull
depth and installing bank protection and habitat measures in select areas. The riparian buffer was also
revegetated along the entire reach to a minimum width of 75 feet, but up to and exceeding 150 feet along
the majority of the reach. A 63-linear foot reach break was inserted downstream of the existing UT2
alignment to allow for an existing ford crossing to be retained and rehabilitated. Near the confluence of
UT2, Back Creek partially flows outside of the easement boundary for 399 feet before it re-enters the
boundaries. This section of Back Creek does not generate credit but received Enhancement Level II
treatment. Finally, below the confluence with UT5, there is 621 linear feet of preservation until the terminus
of Back Creek within the easement.
Reach UT2
A combination of Preservation, Priority I Restoration, and Priority II Restoration was used for Reach UT2
to address existing impairments, particularly aggradation, degradation, bank erosion and floodplain
dislocation. The UT2 watershed is approximately 51 acres, and land use is an even mix of forest and rural
residential. Priority I Restoration was used for the upstream portion of UT2 but is credited at 1:1.5. The
restoration approach involved meandering the proposed channel within the natural valley, installing grade
control/ habitat structures, backfilling the existing stream and excavating a new channel. A minimum buffer
width of 50 feet is provided for all portions of the reach. Preservation was used for the portion of UT2
located within the existing wetland.
Priority II Restoration was used for UT2 just downstream of the existing wetland. This reach has a 79-foot
crossing that is not used to generate credit but received Restoration treatment. The restoration approach
involved meandering the channel within the natural valley, installing grade control/ habitat structures,
backfilling the existing stream and excavating a new channel. A minimum buffer width of 50 feet was
provided for all portions of the reach.
Reach UT4
A combination of Priority I Restoration and Priority II Restoration was used for Reach UT4 to address
existing impairments, particularly degradation, bank erosion and floodplain dislocation. The UT4
watershed is approximately 73 acres, and the land use is heavily forested.
Cloud & Banner 4 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

The restoration approach transitions from Priority I to Priority II as the stream profile lowers to tie to Back
Creek. Both restoration approaches involved meandering the channel within the natural valley, installing
grade control/ habitat structures, and backfilling the existing stream. The Priority I portion was reconnected
to its natural floodplain, and a new floodplain was excavated for the Priority II section. A minimum buffer
width of 50 feet was provided for all portions of the reach. A 24-linear foot easement break was inserted in
the middle of the reach to accommodate a ford crossing.
Reach UT5
Enhancement Level III was used for Reach UT5 to address existing impairments, particularly buffer
degradation. The UT5 watershed is approximately 155 acres, and the land use is heavily forested. A
minimum buffer width of 50 feet was provided for all portions of the reach. UT5 received invasive species
treatment and supplemental planting areas (Figure 10).
Reach UT6
A combination of Restoration and Preservation was used for Reach UT6 to address existing impairments,
particularly degradation, bank erosion, and floodplain dislocation. The UT6 watershed is approximately 32
acres, and land use is an even mix of forest and rural residential.
Restoration was used for the upstream portion of UT6. This included the installation of grade control
structures to step down to the floodplain/wetland area, as well as floodplain grading/reconnection along the
right bank. Preservation was used for UT6 beginning at its intersection with the existing wetland and
extending to the confluence with Back Creek. There is a portion of UT6 between the restoration and
preservation treatments that hits the floodplain and dissipates into the wetland that is not generating stream
credit. A 30-linear foot easement break was inserted in the middle of the reach where there is no
jurisdictional stream channel.
Wetland
Wetland A - Wetland A is preservation at a ratio of 10:1, but benefits from the channel filling of the old
UT4 alignment during Restoration and allowing reconnection of the hydrologic system to the wetland
restoration component of Wetland B.
Wetland B - Portions of Wetland B were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, and some were enhanced at
a credit ratio of 3:1. Those areas being re-established benefit from the Priority I stream restoration treatment
along UT4. Additionally, this area was planted with native tree and shrub species commonly found in
Bottomland Hardwood Forests. The areas being enhanced in WB benefit from the adjacent wetland
preservation and by providing connectivity to the restoration component of Wetland B.
Wetland C - Portions of Wetland C were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, and some were enhanced at
a credit ratio of 3:1. Those areas being restored benefit from the plugging of several ditches in the wetland,
and the planting of native tree and shrub species commonly found in Bottomland Hardwood Forests. The
area being enhanced was planted with native tree and shrub species commonly found in Bottomland
Hardwood Forests and benefit from the plugging of adjacent ditches.
Wetland D - Portions of Wetland D were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, some were re-established
at a credit ratio of 2:1; the remaining portions were preserved at a ratio of 10:1. Wetland D benefits from
the restoration on the upstream portion of UT2. This included removal of an undersized 15-inch CMP and
corresponding crossing that have caused significant sediment deposition upstream. The existing spoil pile
located along the right bank from the crossing downstream to the intersection of UT2 was also removed.
Moreover, portions of wetland D that were not forested were planted with native tree and shrub species
commonly found in headwater forests.
Cloud & Banner 5 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

Wetland E and F - Wetlands E and F are preservation only: these areas remain intact and benefit from the
establishment of the permanent conservation easement.
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in April 2020. Overall, the Cloud & Banner Mitigation
Site was built to design plans and guidelines, with a few changes. Mitigation Plan versus As -Built stream
length differences (Table 1; Appendix A) are within the normal ranges except for UT2-C (detailed below).
A few changes were made to UT2 and UT6-A after mitigation plan submittal and approval, and during
construction.
The first change was downstream of the ford crossing on UT2-C. Channel design was revised to prevent
impacts to the adjacent parcel. RES had discussed the proposed impacts with the adjacent property owner
and both parties reached a verbal agreement for a temporary construction easement. Unfortunately, the
written agreement was never completed due to unforeseen concerns from the adjacent property owner. RES
therefore revised the design to eliminate the need for a temporary construction easement by realigning the
stream to meet Back Creek without grading on the adjacent property owner's parcel. This change increased
the length of UT2-C in the easement by 84 linear feet as well as eliminated an impact to Wetland F,
preserving 0.02 acre.
The next change was the addition of a crossing to the top of UT2-A (outside of the easement) which consists
of two 24" RCP culverts. This change increased the net impacts to Waters of the US on the project and
therefore, modifications of the 404 and 401 permits were obtained. Also, on UT2, two log sills (3+85 and
6+38) were shifted upstream (3+50 and 6+00) to allow channel top of bank to match the existing floodplain.
On UT6-A, the proposed log drops shifted in location and two additional log drops were added during
construction to address channel degradation that had progressed between design and the start of
construction. Lastly, the log jam that was installed on Back Creek at 35+50 washed downstream during a
storm due to incorrect installation and was re -secured with stronger hardware and according to
specifications in its new location at 37+00. A redline version of the as -built survey calls out these changes
and is included with the sealed plat in Appendix E.
Planting plan changes included removing green ash, northern red oak, water oak, and paw paw and
replacing them with pin oak, red mulberry, southern crabapple, bald cypress, sugarberry, and silky
dogwood. Planting plan changes were based on bare root availability. Minor monitoring device location
changes were made during as -built installation including adding an extra random plot and adding flow
gauges to UT2-A, UT4, and UT6-A.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYO)
The Cloud & Banner Baseline Monitoring activities were performed in April 2020. All Baseline
Monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation, stream,
and wetland interim success criteria.
Ve etg ation
Monitoring of the 14 permanent vegetation plots and six random vegetation plots was completed during
April 2020. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations
are in Appendix B. MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria
Cloud & Banner 6 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 647 to 1,133 planted stems per acre with
a mean of 937 planted stems per acre across the permanent plots. A total of 12 species were documented
within the plots. Volunteer species were not noted at baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in
upcoming years. Data from the six random vegetation plots ranged from 567 to 1,295 stems per acre with
a mean of 890 planted stems per acre. The average height in the random vegetation plots was 1.8 feet. Over
all 20 vegetation plots, the mean stems per acre was 923 and the average height was 1.6 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project.
Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MYO was collected during April 2020. Summary tables and cross section plots
are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the design. The as -built
conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all restoration/enhancement reaches.
All reaches were designed as sand bed channels and remain classified as sand bed channels post -
construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
Stream Hydrology
Three flow gauges and one stage recorder were installed in April 2020. Flow gauges are used to demonstrate
at least intermittent flow and are located on UT2-C, UT4, and UT6-A. One stage recorder was installed on
UT4 and is used to document bankfull events. Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring
Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices. Monitoring device locations can be found on Figure 2.
Wetland Hydrology
Ten groundwater wells were installed prior to construction in May 2017 and two additional groundwater
wells were installed in April 2020. The four gauges that are located in preservation areas are used as
reference. Groundwater well locations can be found on Figure 2 and the data will be included subsequent
monitoring reports.
2.0 Methods
Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates
associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200).
Morphological data were collected at 14 cross -sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®,
and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorder and flow gauges include an
automatic pressure transducer set in PVC piping in the channel. The elevation of the bed and top of bank
of the stage recorder location was recorded to be able to document presence of water in the channel and out
of bank events. The elevation of the bed and the crest of the downstream riffle are used for the flow gauges
to determine flow events. Visual observations (i.e. wrack or debris lines) will also be used to document out
of bank events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 14 permanent monitoring plots and six random monitoring plots.
Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2
Cloud & Banner 7 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

(Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density of planted species. Data are
processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked
with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the
origin each monitoring year. The random plots are to be collected in locations where there are no permanent
vegetation plots. Random plots will most likely be collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects
with variable dimensions. Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and the transects
will be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years.
Wetland hydrology is monitored to document success in wetland restoration and enhancement areas where
hydrology was affected. This is accomplished with 12 automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in
groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. Eight have been installed within the wetland
restoration area and four within reference wetland preservation areas. One automatic pressure transducer is
installed above ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland
hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory
guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also recorded
during quarterly site visits.
3.0 References
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,
Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions. 2019. Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site Final
Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic
and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble.
ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
Cloud & Banner 8 As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project July 2020

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Cloud & Banner - Mitigation Assets and Components
Existing
Mitigation
Footage
Plan
I
I
I Mitigation
As -Built
or
Footage or
Mitigation
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
As -Built
Project Segment
Acreage
Acreage
Category
Level
Level
Ratio(X:1)
Credits
Acreage
Credits
Comments
Back Creek
2453
2454
Warm
Enhancement II
2.5
982
3839
1536
Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek
155
155
Warm
Enhancement II
2.5
62
Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek
1251
1251
Warm
Enhancement II
2.5
500
Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek
352
621
Warm
Preservation
10
62
621
62
Permanent conservation easement
UT2-A
242
329
Warm
Restoration
1
1.5
219
336
224
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT2-B
206
242
Warm
Preservation
10
24
242
24
Permanent conservation easement
UT2-C
0
347
Warm
Restoration
2
1
347
590
590
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT2-C
498
169
Warm
Restoration
1
1
169
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT4
354
606
Warm
Restoration
1
1
606
1067
1067
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT4
381
477
Warm
Restoration
2
1
477
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT5
363
726
Warm
Enhancement 111
7.5
97
726
97
Permanent conservation easement, invasive species treatment, planting
UT6-A
460
459
Warm
Restoration
2
1
459
486
486
Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT6-B
243
243
Warm
Preservation
10
24
243
24
Permanent conservation easement
WA
7.26
RR
Preservation
10
0.73
7.258
0.726
Permanent conservation easement
WB
3.81
RR
Re-establishment
1
3.81
3.81
3.810
Floodplain connection, planting
WB
0.67
RR
Enhancement
3
0.22
0.661
0.220
Planting
WC
2.19
RR
Re-establishment
1
2.19
2.187
2.187
Plugged ditches, planting
WC
0.54
RR
Enhancement
3
0.18
0.538
0.179
Planting
WD
0.73
RR
Re-establishment
1
0.73
0.733
0.733
Floodplain connection, planting, culvert repair, spoil pile removal
WD
0.15
RR
Re-establishment
2
0.08
0.155
0.078
Floodplain connection, planting
W
1.28
RR
Preservation
10
0.13
1.28
0.128
Permanent conservation easement
WED
1.19
RR
Preservation
10
0.12
1.195
0.120
Permanent conservation easement
WF
0.22
RR
I Preservation
10
0.02
0.236
1 0.024
Permanent conservation easement
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Rip
Wetland
Coastal
Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non-Riv
Restoration
2367.0
Re-establishment
6.81
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
0.40
Enhancement)
Enhancement II
1535.6
Enhancement III
96.8
Creation
Preservation
110.6
0.997
Total
4110.0
1 otal 8.20
NSBW Admustment
1 128
Total Adjusted SMUs
1 4238

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 3 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 3 months
Number of reporting Years : 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Sep-18
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Mar-19
Construction
NA
Apr-20
Site Planting
NA
Apr-20
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Apr-20
Jul-20
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc. / 720 Corporate Center Dr., Raleigh,
NC 27607
Primary project design POC
Thomas Murray, PE
Construction Contractor
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27610
Construction contractor POC
Paul Dunn
Survey Contractor
WSP USA / 434 Fayetteville St, Suite 1500, Raleigh, NC
27601
Survey contractor POC
Christopher Mielke, PLS
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Monitoring Performers
RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27610
Stream Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Ryan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project
Background Information
Project Name
Cloud & Banner
County
Alamance
Project Area (acres)
59.76
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 36.143777 N Longitude:
-79.271535 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
23.2
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Souther Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS 8-digit HUC
03030002
USGS 14-digit HUC
03030002030070
DWR Sub -basin
03-06-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
9,291 ac (14.5 sqmi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<2%
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Back Creek
UT2
UT4
UT5
UT6
Drainage area (Acres)
9,163
51
73
155
32
mi
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
I
I
P
--d
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW-2016-
02451
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR # 16-0847
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
Mit Plan
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

andl Ln
i
Burlington
Cloud and Banner
Site
Z
n
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Date: 3/6/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Site
Checked by: BPB
1,000
Alamance County, North Carolina
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Hillsborough
fires

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Cloud & Banner Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (4/16/2020)
ti
h r
E ��, - � • __'�"fir _. �P
� , _� � �
Vegetation Plot 3 (4/16/2020)
Vegetation Plot 2 (4/16/2020)
Vegetation Plot 4 (4/17/2020)

Vegetation Plot 5 (4/16/2020)
Vegetation Plot 7 (4/17/2020)
Vegetation Plot 6 (4/16/2020)
Vegetation Plot 8 (4/17/2020)

M�m
OIL
r
1-777'
V7

Vegetation Plot 13 (4/16/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (4/16/2020)
Vegetation Plot 14 (4/16/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (4/16/2020)

Random Vegetation Plot 3 (4/16/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 5 (4/16/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 4 (4/17/2020)
Random Vegetation Plot 6 (4/17/2020)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
4,560
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
3,700
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,800
Pin Oak
Quercus palustris
2,500
Red Mulberry
Morus rubra
2,100
Southern Crabapple
Malus angustifolia
2,000
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
2,000
River Birch
Betula nigra
1,800
Tulip Poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
1,300
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
1,300
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
1,200
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
700
Total
25,960
Planted Areal
23.2
As -built Planted Stems/Acre
1 1,119

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height (ft)
1
890
0
890
Yes
1.7
2
1133
0
1133
Yes
1.6
3
931
0
931
Yes
1.5
4
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.3
5
850
0
850
Yes
1.6
6
647
0
647
Yes
1.4
7
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.4
8
809
0
809
Yes
1.3
9
1052
0
1052
Yes
1.3
10
971
0
971
Yes
1.4
11
769
0
769
Yes
1.5
12
1093
0
1093
Yes
1.5
13
1012
0
1012
Yes
2.0
14
890
0
890
Yes
1.6
R1
850
0
850
Yes
1.9
R2
1295
0
1295
Yes
2.0
R3
567
0
567
Yes
1.5
R4
931
0
931
Yes
2.0
R5
769
0
769
Yes
1.6
R6
931
0
931
Yes
1.4
Project Avg
923
0
937
Yes
1.6

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Cloud & Banner
Current Plot Data (MYO 2020)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
04202020-01-0001
04202020-01-0002
04202020-01-0003
04202020-01-0004
04202020-01-0005
04202020-01-0006
04202020-01-0007
04202020-01-0008
PnOL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Cornus amomum
s&y dogwood
Shrub
1 3
3
3
1
1
1 1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
6
61
6
21
2
2
2
21
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tuff ifera
tulitree
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
5
5
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
Americansycamore
Tree
5
5
51
2
2
2
3
3
31
5
5
5
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
51
5
51
5
5
6
61
6
21
2
2
1
11
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
8
8
8
41
41
4
Taxodium distichum
lbald cypress
ITree
4
41
4
4
4
4
2
21
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
221
221
22
28
28
28
23
231
23
25
25
25
21
21
21
16
16
16
26
26
26
201
201
20
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
8
81
81
101
101
10
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
7
7A6477
9
9
9
11
11
11
890
890
890
1133
1133
1133
931
931
931
1012
1012
1012
850
850
850
647
647
1052
1052
1052
809
809
809
Cloud & Banner
Current Plot Data (MYO 2020)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
04202020-01-0009
04202020-01-0010
04202020-01-0011
04202020-01-0012
04202020-01-0013
04202020-01-0014
MYO (2020)
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
PnoL
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
1
1
1
28
28
28
Celtis laevi ata
sugarberry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
18
18
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
14
14
14
Diospyros virgin' ma
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
4
5
51
5
1
3
31
3
11
1
1
3
31
3
33
331
33
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
191
19
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
22
22
22
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
2
2
21
5
5
51
3
3
3
1 1
1
1
21
21
21
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
11
22
22
22
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
11
1
21
2
2
4
41
4
11
1
1
2
2
2
36
36
36
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
20
201
20
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
61
6
6
9
9
9
5
51
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
50
50
50
Taxodium distichum
ball cypress
Tree
2
2
2
13
13
13
9
91
9
41
41
41
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
261
261
26
24
24
24
19
19
19
27
27
27
25
25
25
22
221
22
324
324
324
1
1
1
1
1
1
14
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.35
10
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
7
10
10
10
8
8
8
10
10
10
12
12
12
1052
1052
1052
971
971
971
769
769
769
1093
1093
1093
1012
1012
1012
890
890
890
937
937
937

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 1
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
38
2
Taxodium distichum
78
3
Taxodium distichum
68
4
Quercus phellos
48
5
Taxodium distichum
63
6
Quercus palustris
58
7
Liriodendron tulipifera
49
8
Liriodendron tulipifera
55
9
Liriodendron tulipifera
61
10
Quercus phellos
49
11
Quercus phellos
40
12
Liriodendron tulipifera
50
13
Taxodium distichum
65
14
Diospyros virginiana
40
15
Betula nigra
72
16
Betula nigra
73
17
Taxodium distichum
61
18
Taxodium distichum
65
19
Taxodium distichum
59
20
Taxodium distichum
60
21
Quercus palustris
55
Stems/Acre
850
Average Height (cm)
57
Average Height (ft)
1.9
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2
Random Plot 2
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Taxodium distichum
55
2
Taxodium distichum
68
3
Taxodium distichum
59
4
Taxodium distichum
65
5
Taxodium distichum
60
6
Taxodium distichum
72
7
Taxodium distichum
62
8
Morus rubra
63
9
Taxodium distichum
64
10
Taxodium distichum
55
11
Taxodium distichum
55
12
Quercus phellos
55
13
Taxodium distichum
46
14
Taxodium distichum
65
15
Taxodium distichum
70
16
Taxodium distichum
65
17
Celtis laevigata
71
18
Quercus phellos
56
19
Quercus palustris
66
20
Quercus palustris
63
21
Quercus phellos
65
22
Taxodium distichum
30
23
Taxodium distichum
67
24
Taxodium distichum
75
25
Taxodium distichum
72
26
Taxodium distichum
66
27
Taxodium distichum
72
28
Taxodium distichum
66
29
Taxodium distichum
72
30
Taxodium distichum
61
31
Taxodium distichum
41
32
Quercus phellos
52
Stems/Acre
1295
Average Height (cm)
62
Average Height (ft)
2.0
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Cornus amumom
47
2
Quercus palustris
35
3
Quercus palustris
32
4
Quercus michauxii
31
5
Quercus michauxii
48
6
Celtis laevigata
39
7
Cornus amumom
45
8
Platanus occidentalis
62
9
Taxodium distichum
60
10
Cornus amumom
49
11
Taxodium distichum
61
12
Cornus amumom
45
13
Quercus phellos
40
14
Quercus phellos
43
Stems/Acre
567
Average Height (cm)
46
Average Height (ft)
1.5
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
7b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 4
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Diospyros virginiana
60
2
Taxodium distichum
57
3
Taxodium distichum
68
4
Taxodium distichum
62
5
Taxodium distichum
65
6
Taxodium distichum
56
7
Taxodium distichum
70
8
Malus an usti olia
58
9
Taxodium distichum
65
10
Taxodium distichum
65
11
Taxodium distichum
65
12
Taxodium distichum
35
13
Taxodium distichum
62
14
Taxodium distichum
68
15
Taxodium distichum
71
16
Taxodium distichum
65
17
Taxodium distichum
61
18
Diospyros virginiana
49
19
Taxodium distichum
62
20
Taxodium distichum
68
21
Taxodium distichum
65
22
Taxodium distichum
65
23
Taxodium distichum
65
Ste ms /Acre
931
Average Height (cm)
62
Average Height (ft)
2.0
Plot Size (m)
25x4
Random Plot 5
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Quercus palustris
43
2
Quercus michauxii
60
3
Quercus michauxii
32
4
Quercus phellos
35
5
Taxodium distichum
58
6
Taxodium distichum
57
7
Quercus michauxii
58
8
Quercus michauxii
52
9
Taxodium distichum
36
10
Taxodium distichum
45
11
Taxodium distichum
60
12
Taxodium distichum
65
13
Taxodium distichum
35
14
Quercus palustris
45
15
Betula nigra
61
16
Cornus amumom
50
17
Cornus amumom
47
18
Cornus amumom
52
19
Quercus palustris
53
Stems/Acre
769
Average Height (cm)
50
Average Height (ft)
1.6
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2
Random Plot 6
#
Spe cie s
Height (cm)
1
Diospyros virginiana
35
2
Betula nigra
75
3
Diospyros virginiana
20
4
Diospyros virginiana
23
5
Celtis laevigata
30
6
Betula nigra
66
7
Liriodendron tulipifera
55
8
Morus rubra
47
9
Cornus amomum
47
10
Cornus amomum
49
11
Diospyros virginiana
23
12
Liriodendron tulipifera
63
13
Diospyros virginiana
32
14
Morus rubra
33
15
Quercus phellos
52
16
Celtis laevi ata
51
17
Liriodendron tulipifera
55
18
Platanus occidentalis
37
19
Diospyros virginiana
31
20
Quercus palustris
25
21
Betula nigra
51
22
Betula nigra
18
23
Quercus michauxii
38
Stems/Acre
931
Average Height (cm)
42
Average Height (ft)
1.4
Plot Size (m)
50 x 2

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT2-A - Cross Section 1 - Riffle - Restoration (1.5:1)
549
548
547
°
546
d
-
w
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- - -
545
544
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
545.31
Bankfull Width (ft)'
4.2
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
0.5
Low Bank Elevation ft
545.31
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
1.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>10.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratioll
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT2-A - Cross Section 2 - Pool - Restoration (1.5:1)
547
546
545
°
544
d
w
543
542
541
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2
Pool
6MM
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi
543.28
Bankfull Width (ft)'
3.9
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull MaxDepth(ft)2
0.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
543.28
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
2.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT2-C - Cross Section 3 - . _...._ - Restoration
543
542
541
° 540
d
w 539
538
537
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — • Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
6MM
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Eevation (ft) -Based on ABASA1
539.64
Bankfull Width (ft)'
13.4
Floodprone Width (ft)'
46
BankfullMaxDepth (ft)2
1.1
Low Bank Elevation (tt)
539.64
BanktullCross Sectional Area (ft2)2
42
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>3.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT2-C - Cross Section 4 - . _ _. - Restoration
543
542
541
° 540
w 539
538
537
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi
539.49
Bankfull Width (ft)t
5.9
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
539.49
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
4.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream Downstream
Cloud and Banner Reach UT2-C - Cross Section 5 - Pool - Restoration
542
541
540
g 539 — — — — — — — — — — —
w 538
537
536
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi
538.91
Bankfull Width (ft)'
8.4
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.91
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
6.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio i
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio i
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT2-C - Cross Section 6 - . _...._ - Restoration
542
541
540
° 539
w 538
537
536
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSAi
538.78
Bankfull Width (ft)t
7.1
Floodprone Width (ft)t
49.8
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.78
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
5.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>7.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT4 - Cross Section 7 - - Restoration
543
542
541
°
540
w 539
538
537
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 7
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASAi
539.77
Bankfull Width (ft)t
8.1
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
539.77
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
72
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

�,"
4-
_44
Ee
e
Y
.: "I
r�
3
i
p
fie,
Upstream Downstream
Cloud and Banner Reach UT4 - Cross Section 8 - Riffle - Restoration
543
542
541
° 540
a) — —
w 539
538
537
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8 1
Riffle
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Flevation (ft) -Based on ABASAi
539.57
Bankfull Width (ft)'
8.3
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>50
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
539.57
BankfullCross Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
4.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>6.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT4 - Cross Section 9 - Pool - Restoration
542
541
540
0
° 539
w 538
537
536
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 9
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) -Based on ABASAi
539.49
Bankfull Width (ft)'
10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
539.49
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
82
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

543
542
541
° 540
w 539
538
537
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT4 - Cross Section 10 - . _...._ - Restoration
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Bas ed on AB-XSAi
539.25
Bankfull Width (ft)t
8.1
Floodprone Width (ft)t
>50
BankfullMaxDepth(ft)2
0.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
539.25
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2 ) 2
4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
>6.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT4 - Cross Section 11 - Restoration
542
541
540
0
° 539
d
w 538
537
536
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Saction 11 B
MY4
�,2Y 1
ld 2
%M
N Y5
;7'
_4
SaultifullElrtiarloit(fl)- Sasedon 918-XSA
737-31
RumullWidth (ft),
5-7r
Flo o dpiTneWidth ft t
>50
BanVLM -Max Deloth (ft)�
101
Low Baril, Elevatian ft
737-51
B antfull Cro s s Sectional Area ft' '
.29
2atal:EEntrenclirnentRatio 1
>8.7
B antSull Bank Height Ratio 11
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT4 - Cross Section 12 - Pool - Restoration
542
541
540
0
° 539
m—
>
a)
w 538
— — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
_
— —
— —
—
— —
—
537
536
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASA1
538.81
Bankfull Width (ft)'
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)I
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.81
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2
8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
I -
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
441C ;i I { } x j•
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT6-A - Cross Section 13 - . _...._ - Restoration
552
_
551
550
°
549
w
548
547
546
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
538.81
Bankfull Width (ft)t
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)t
-
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)2
1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.81
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2
8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

4• r' + r �!
.� ..h •r=..ram-
,47
�.
Upstream
'art :¢; � ��' _!r"• �.5--
Downstream
Cloud and Banner - Reach UT6-A - Cross Section 14 - . _ _. - Restoration
550
549
548
° 547
w 546
545
544
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02020 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull f3evation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1
538.81
Bankfull Width (ft)t
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)t
-
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)2
1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.81
Bankfull Cro s s Sectional Area (ft 2)2
8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio t
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cloud & Banner Mitigation Site - Reach UT2
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
9.3
---
---
---
---
---
10.9
---
---
---
---
6.3
---
4.2
8.2
7.1
13.4
4.7
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
>20
---
---
---
---
---
50.0
---
---
---
---
>14
---
45.7
48.5
49.8
50.0
2.4
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
0.4
---
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
0.8
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
---
1.7
---
---
---
---
1.1
---
0.5
1.0
1.1
1.4
0.5
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
--
3.9
---
---
---
11.0
---
---
---
---
4.7
---
1.0
3.6
1 4.2
1 5.6
1 2.4
1 3
Width/Depth Ratio
22.3
---
---
---
---
11.9
---
---
I ---
I ---
1 8.4
---
---
---
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
---
---
---
---
>2.2
---
---
>2.2
3.4
7.1
7.0
10.9
3.8
3
'Bank Height Ratio
1.0
---
---
---
---
1.3
---
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5
---
---
23
---
---
4
---
---
19.9
---
---
---
---
---
1.1
12.9
10.3
79.1
13.9
33
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.001
0.057
0.018
0.914
0.161
33
Pool Length (ft)
6.5
---
---
13
---
---
6.9
---
---
21.6
---
---
---
---
---
1.5
9.1
7.8
26.4
5.3
32
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
25.2
---
---
37
---
---
40.3
---
---
109.8
---
---
---
---
---
7.7
30.4
27.4
71.1
14.6
29
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
41.2
---
---
43.5
---
---
12
---
27
12
---
---
27
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.1
---
---
24.6
---
---
13
---
17
13
---
---
17
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.2
---
---
2.3
---
---
2
---
2.7
2
---
---
2.7
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
49.5
---
---
64.9
---
---
38
---
66
38
---
---
66
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
--
---
---
3.8
4
---
---
1.9
---
4.3
1.9
---
4.3
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C6
E5
E6
E6
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
--
Valley length (ft)
748
285
495
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
856
375
600
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.14
1.32
1.21
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0059
0.0023
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0052
0.025
0.003
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
---
I ---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued)
Cloud & Banner Mitigation Site - Reach UT4
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
6.8
---
---
11.4
---
---
---
---
7.8
---
---
---
---
7.8
---
8.1
9.5
8.8
12.1
1.8
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.0
---
---
>25
---
---
---
---
100.0
---
---
---
---
>18
---
42.7
48.2
50.0
50.0
3.7
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
0.6
---
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
0.7
---
---
---
---
0.7
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.1
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
---
1.0
---
0.8
1.3
1.0
2.2
0.6
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
---
6.0
7.0
---
---
---
---
5.7
---
---
5.7
---
4.2
7.6
5.0
1 16.4
1 5.9
1 4
Width/Depth Ratio
7.7
18.5
---
---
---
---
10.7
---
8.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3
>2.2
---
---
---
---
12.8
---
>2.2
---
3.5
5.3
5.7
6.2
1.2
4
'Bank Height Ratiol
1
1.0
2.5
---
---
---
---
1.0
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8
---
---
18
---
---
3.1
---
---
30.7
---
---
---
---
---
4.5
20.3
19.5
43.9
10.1
25
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.000
0.006
0.005
0.020
0.005
25
Pool Length (ft)
11
---
---
16
---
---
4.2
---
---
9.5
---
---
---
---
---
4.1
12.1
11.4
30.7
6.2
25
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
31
---
---
70
---
---
17.5
---
---
59.8
---
---
---
---
---
13.8
43.5
45.0
65.2
13.3
24
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13.6
---
---
31.8
---
---
18
---
34
18
---
34
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
11
---
---
27.6
---
---
14
---
22
14
---
22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
--
1.4
---
---
3.5
---
---
1.7
---
2.8
1.7
---
2.8
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
34.9
---
---
68.3
---
---
54
---
107
54
---
107
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
--
1.7
---
4.1
---
---
2.3
---
4.4
2.3
4.4
---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C6 - E6
E5
E6
E6
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
Valley length (ft)
844
274
910
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
900
309
1114
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.13
1.22
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0017
0.004
---
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.0011
0.003
0.002
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
---
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name: Cloud and Banner
Cross Section 1(Riffle) UT2-A
Cross Section 2 (Pool) UT2-A
Cross Section 3 (Riffle) UT2-C
Cross Section 4 (Pool) UT2-C
Cross Section 5 (Pool) UT2-C
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
545.3
543.3
539.6
539.5
538.9
Bankfull Width (ft)'
4.2
3.9
13.4
5.9
8.4
Floodprone Width ft 1
>50
-
46
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth ft z
0.5
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
545.31
543.3
539.6
539.5
538.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1.0
2.1
4.2
4.6
6.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>10.9
-
>3.4
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
-
Cross Section 6 (Riffle) UT2-C
Cross Section 7 (Pool) UT4
Cross Section 8 (Riffle) UT4
Cross Section 9 (Pool) UT4
Cross Section 10 (Riffle) UT4
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
538.8
539.8
539.6
539.5
539.2
Bankfull Width (ft)'
7.1
8.1
8.3
10.8
8.1
Floodprone Width ft l
49.8
-
>50
-
>50
Bankfull Max Depth (11;
1.4
1.5
1.0
1.6
0.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.8
539.8
539.6
539.5
539.25
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area f� z
5.6
7.2
4.2
8.2
4.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>7.0
-
>6.0
-
>6.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross
Section
11(Riffle)
UT4
Cross
Section
12 (Pool)
UT4
Cross
Section
13 (Riffle)
UT6-A
Cross
Section
14 (Pool)
UT6-A
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
538.8
538.8
549.3
547.3
Bankfull Width (ft)'
9.3
9.3
12.1
12.0
Floodprone Width ft 1
>50
-
>42.7
-
Bankfull Max Depth ft z
1.0
1.8
2.2
2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
538.78
538.8
549.3
547.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
5.4
8.2
16.4
15.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.4
>3.5
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Appendix E
As -Built Plan Sheets

PURPOSE S TA TEMEN T
THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW AS -BUILT CONDITIONS ALONG
VARIOUS NEWLY CONSTRUCTED MITIGATION AREAS ON THE CLOUD
BANNER SITE LOCATED IN ALAMANCE COUNTY, NC. WSP UTILIZED
CONVENTIONAL SURVEYING PRACTICES TO LOCATE GROUND FEATURES
Ro AND ACCURATELY DISPLAY THESE FEATURES ON THIS AS -BUILT MAP.
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE
- - AD✓OINER BOUNDARY LINE
-x—x—x—x—x—x—x FENCE LINE
- - - - PT RIGHT TOP OF BANK LINE
- - - - LT LEFT TOP OF BANK LINE
LOG STRUCTURE
I CREST GAUGE RECORDED
OO IRON FOUND
® GROUNDWATER WELL
RIP RAP AREA
TOE PROTECTION
y y y y WETLANDS - PRESERVATION
WETLANDS - RE-ESTABLISHMENT
WETLANDS - RE-ESTABLISHMENT
WETLANDS -ENHANCEMENT
ASHREVIA TIONS
NOTES
1. BASIS OF BEARINGS: NC GRID, NAD 83 (2011).
2. ALL CONTOURS AND ELEVA TIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE
VERTICAL DA TUM NA VD 88.
J. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S.
SURVEY FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. NO PROPERTY LINES WERE SURVEYED DURING THIS AS -BUILT
SURVEY. ALL EASEMENTS AND PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN BY
PREVIOUS SURVEYS BY WSP AS RECORDED IN THE ALAMANCE
COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS.
5. ALL WETLAND AREAS, SURFACE WATER FEATURES AND VEGETATION
PLOTS SHOWN HEREON WERE PROVIDED TO WSP AS SHAPE FILES
BY RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. WSP DOES NOT
CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THESE FILES
6. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES OR CONVEYANCES.
CL O UD A ND Bel NNER
IVII TI Gil TION PIT OJEC T
ALAMANCE COUV T Y, NORTH C% ROT IN%
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN HUC OJOJ002
A S— SUIL T SUR VE Y
PROJECT COORDIN% TES
LA TI TUDE. 36 8 °38. 57W
L ONGI TUDE- 79 `16 '19. 5.3 "W
PROJECT DIREC TOR)"
DESIGNER: MONITORING PERFORMERS
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 700 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27672 RALEIGH, NC 27612
[phone] [phone]
CPP
CORRUGATED PLASTIC PIPE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR:
SURVEYING:
IRF
RON ROD FOUND
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
WSP
R/W
RIGHT OF WAY
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
128 TALBERT ROAD, SUITE A
VEGETATION PLOT
RALEIGH, NC 27612
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
XS
CROSS SECTION
[phone]
[phone]
BANK. BANK SPONSOR:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL BANC & EXCHANGE, LLC
CAPE FEAR 02 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 700 RALEIGH, NC 26710
RALEIGH, NC 27612 [phone]
[phone]
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET S7
STREAM BASELINE OVERVIEW S2
STREAM MONITORING OVERVIEW S3
STREAM BASELINE AS-BUILTS S4 - S70
'ti
....��
..nup•n.•••
S�
v
J
J
O
LI�
Ot
�
O
m
J
Z
a�
Z
o
C):�cj�
O
� Z
Qr
Q
O
J
Q
�
v
O
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20
UPDATED WETLAND AREA
"
WSP USA Inc.
MO RESVILLALBERT ROAD, SUITE
MOORESVILLE, NC 26117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
1 OF 10
Book No. —

Now OR FORMCRLr
DA ND & COVN/E WH/TPTELO
P/N: 9B27-02-4764
DB 3317 PC 311
Now oR FORMER[ r
_
Q
NOW OR FORMERLY
IRA NS WA )NE HACKNEY
& WI& RNA B. HACKNEY
017-92-05
RICHARD ALEXANDER
P/N: 9B17-92-B743PIN,
_
_ —
0@ 3928 592
NOW OR FORMERLv
\
DB 2031 PG 45
—
\`a
\ Q1
Q /
/
DB 2006 PG 736
PB 39 PG 139
PB 72 PG 322
\ TRANS HACKNEY
P/N: 9B17-9P-S60P
\
l l
W OR FORMERLY
�
PS BD PC 27B
DB 165J PG 997
\
NORMANON J ANDERSON &
Wi/e JOAN ANDERSON
P/N: 017-82-6225
DB 392B PG 590
_
_
t�_l
♦v
DB 556 PG 103
\
_
V)
PB J7 PG 193
/
_ —
PB BO PG 27B
x51
����p//''��
WD
-
REACH UT2-B
PRESERVATION
� �
; WG•x %
-
we
`
NOW OR FORMERLY
I
REACH UT2-C
+
�.
ZRALO D & NANCY L GR/SSOM
I
RESTORATION
V ` �7
_ _
P/N: 9B17-B1-5902
DB 1806 PG 897
I
NOW OR FORMERLY
STEPHEN EGTS
1
. REACH UT2-A
RESTORA ON
J
PIN: 9B17-B1-9BB9
7
` `
LG
-
_ -
DB 3098 PC 876
WF
,.
V
xS5/6 - •
/tP
LP
NOW OR FORMERLY
DARR/N ALLRED
P/N. 9B17-91-0620
7 J
D@ 1748 PC 92
X56
X9R1
RP
-+
/
ENHANCEMENT// \
NOW OR FORMERLY
I I
CHRISTOPHER PfRK/NS
P/N: 9B17-B1-7234
DB 2959 PG 672
/�/
REACH UT6-A�I
RESTORARON
„
I
I
'
I
REACH UM-B
PRESERVA7ICN
Kn
p
REACH
a P
P
RESTOR.
S,S
/0
B W—
//
NOW OR FORMERLY
ry"
�"
EA N ONMENTALEXCHANGE. BLL C
,.
AND EXCHANGE, LLC
9
P/7-00-151B
XSB
DB 7 PG
G 354
PB BO PC 1787B
`
RP
RP
LCE
`. .`.+.
.`.+.
`.`.`.`
w,a
`` V`.
/ /
\ REACH UT5
III\
\ENHANCEMENT
i�^
b
i REACH
\
/
BACK CREEK
/
/ PRESERVATIOV
/
�O1e/
NOW OR FORMERLY
T
NOW OR RMERL v
K/MES CHAPEL MISSIONARY
BAPTIST \
I
K/MES CHAPEL CHURCH
9816-89-7990
P/N: 9B16-B9-29B6
\
DB 1311 PG MO
I II
I I
I I
DB 114 PG 510
I
1
0
NOW oR FORMERLY
REW LAND, LLC
PIN. 9826-08-3258
DB 3447 PG 752
I
I N O
C0
I z
Nt
m
I W U
CDCT]
Z
(AI � �
I m U
I Z
I
I
I
I
NOW OR FORMERLY
JOHNNY PULLIAM HERS
P/N: 9B27-22-J036
ABACK CREEK
REACH DB 377 PG 342
ENHANCEMENT/1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O CREDITS
WETLAN
WETLAND
FEA TORE ID
MITIGATION TYPE
TOTAL ACRES
WA
PRESERVA TION
726
WB
RE—ESTABLISHMENT
3.81
WB
ENHANCEMENT
0.67
WC
RE—ESTABLISHMENT
2.19
WC
ENHANCEMENT
0.54
WD
RE—ESTABLISHMENT
0.73
WD
RE—ESTABLISHMENT
0.15
WD
PRESERVA TION
1.28
WE
PRESERVA TION
1.19
WF
PRESERVATION
0.24
TOTAL
18.05
REACH AS—SU/LT LENGTHS
REACH /D
MITIGATION TYPE
AS—BU/LT LENGTH
UT4
RESTORAT/ON
1066 FT.
UT2—A
RESTORAT/ON
432 FT.
UT2-3
PRESERVATION
242 FT.
UT2—C
RESTORAT/ON
713 FT.
UT5
ENHANCEMENT ll/
726 FT.
UT6—A
RESTORAT/ON
500 FT.
UT6-3
PRESERVATION
243 FT.
BACK CREEK
ENHANCEMENT //
3839 FT.
BACK CREEK
PRESER VA TION
621 FT.
TOTAL.8382 FT.
,N GRAPHIC SCALE
F` 150 0 75 150
( IN FEET )
mm�t•..•
1 inch = 150 ft.
S2
v
J
v
it
O
Z
IV�I o
�
V
Q
Z
Z
7Qr
T
O
Z
Z
J
Q
�
v
O
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20
UPDATED WETLAND AREA
"
WSP USA Inc.
MO RESVILLALBERT ROAD, SUITE
MOORESVILLE, NC 26117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
1 = 150'
Sheet No.
2 OF 10
Book No. —

NOW OR FORMERLY
DA ND & CONNIE WH/7E/ELD
P/N: 9B27-02-4764
NOW OR FORMERLY DB 3317 PC 311
Now OR FORMERLY _
NA NS WA )NE HACKNEY RICHARD ALEXANDER _ —
Q & WI& RNA @. HACKNEY AN, 9B17-92-B743AN, 017-92-05
DB J928 592 NOW OR FORMERLv \ 0@ 20J1 PG
46 _
\`a DB 2006 PG 736 \ 7RA NS HACKNEY —
\ Q1 P@ 39 PG 139 P/N 9B17-92-4602 \
Q / / PB 72 PG 322
PB BD PC 27B DB 165J PG 997 \
W OR FORMERLY � \ \ _ —�
l l NORMANON J ANDERSON & A15
wile JDAN ANDERSON
AN, 9B17-B2-6225
DB 392B PG 590
DB 556 PG 103 oo
PB BO PG 27B xsl
-
- REACH UT2-B " J
PRESERVATION
-I — NOW OR FORMERLY I REACH 172-C 12 " ` .Aw5
l� ZRALD D & NANCY L GR/SSOM I RESTORA7/ON .. � . • �7
_ P/N: 9B17-B1-5902 NOW OR FORMERLY "
STEPHEN EG75 REACH U72-A
DB 1806 PG 897 I RESTORA7/ON
JPIN: 9B17-B1-9BB9-J
- _ - . DB 309E PG 876 51 ,
L P-4
xs4 xv O
NOW OR FORMERLY BP
DARR/N ALLRED P /Q
D 1748
\ P/9177 -0620 7 J
@ PG 92 OUP-5
xse
XS„/l2 0
RP
r, �, IP-6
REACH
BACK CREEK REACH p REACH U14
ENHANCEMENT // �2 x5// RESICRADQN
P
9
--�--�-- kp_7� - UP-73
I CHR/STOPHfR PfRK/NS E]bn
tP VP-14 A
P/N: 9B17-B1-7234
NOW
D@ 2959OR PGFORMERLY 672 WB
NOW OR FORMERLY
— _ — ENIARONMENTAL BANC
— _ AND EXCHANGE, LLC ®w
2 WB
P/N. 9B27-00-2518 ay.B
0@ J547 PG 109
PB BO PG 2787/g
RP
un
I UP—B "
,3 O .. �.`. `. �.` .`. �. .
REACH LIM-A I I —4 `• ``•`` ``+` ``+`
RESTORA 17ON RP
LCE
I I WA y.`.
I TIC-�nwra
IP-9
REAC
PRES
REACH
VP QV / BACK CREEK
PRESERVA7IQV
0
/
I /
IDB
I I
I
NOW OR RMt D ERL Y
K/MES CHAPEL CHURCH
9BI6-89-2986
119 PG 510
\ ❑UP-10
\ REACH UIS
III
I\ENHANCEMENT
i
7
\
\
NOW OR FORMERLY
K/MfS CHAPEL MISSIONARY
I
\
@APRST
9BI6-89-7990
IBB 2312 PG 590
0
Now oR FORMERLY
ROW LAND, LLC
P/N. 9826-08-3258
DB 3447 PG 752
I
I N O
C0
I z
co
m
I CO U
CO
Z
O
I /❑ �-1 I v7 � I COU Z
I
I
I
I
NOW OR FORMERLY
JOHNNY PULLIAM HERS
MONITORING
DESCRIPTION NORTHING EASPNG ELEVATIONXS1 RP 872,152.46 1,919,878.82 546
XS2 RP 872.099.49 1,919,892.19 544.54
XS1 LP 872.148.56 1,919,928.52 545.52
XS2 LP 872,140.05 1,919,921.16 543.66
XS3 LP 871,746.89 1,919,734.44 541.10
XS3 RP 871,794.78 1,919,720.13 539.98
XS4 RP 871,803.09 1,919,717.01 540.57
XS4 LP 871,757.42 1,919,696.90 539.82
XS5 LP 871,642.21 1,919,488.54 540.19
XS5/6 RP 871.681.09 1,919,457.68 539.33
XS6 LP 871,631.45 1,919,459.18 539.80
XS7/8 RP 871,143.13 1,920,210.45 539.76
XS7 LP 871,107.75 1,920,175.05 539.76
XS8 LP 871,151.68 1,920,161.17 539.99
XS9 LP 871,329.97 1,920,016.18 539.66
XS10 LP 871,356.60 1,920,008.22 539.66
XS9/10 RP 871,356.96 1,920,057.98 539.36
XS11 LP 871,499.93 1,919,857.87 539.67
XS12 LP 871,501.91 1,919,820.99 539.68
XS11/12 RP 871,547.39 1,919,841.76 539.27
XS13 LP 871,039.13 1,918,528.44 552.59
XS13 RP 1 871,002.45 1 1,918,494.54 549.78
XS14 RP 870,969.52 1,918,522.32 1 548.18
CROSS SECTION CONTROL
.08
CREEK
P/N: 9827-22-3036
REACH DB 377 PG 342
EXHANNHANCEMENT// I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_ —
/
XS14 LP 871,009.79 1 1,918,552.50 548.97
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 75 150
S
IN FEET )
1 inch = 150 ft.
CROSS SECTION CONTROL
.08
CREEK
P/N: 9827-22-3036
REACH DB 377 PG 342
EXHANNHANCEMENT// I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_ —
/
XS14 LP 871,009.79 1 1,918,552.50 548.97
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 0 75 150
S
IN FEET )
1 inch = 150 ft.
S�3
v
J
v
it
O
cl�
o°
�
Z
v
Z
�O
°
Z
cl�
Q
Z
Z
�
vQV
O
�
v
O
V
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20
UPDATED WETLAND AREA
"
WSP USA Inc.
MO RESVILLALBERT ROAD, SUITE
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661c
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
1" = 150'
Sheet No.
3 OF 10
Book No. —

F F A�
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 'VC 14' f/O 0/ 1
F F F F F F F F AW-4 F F F F e
F `n' F
F\ F F F F F F FV VA F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 08�r 2O )I
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F `n' F F
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F V VA F F F
F
F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F
/EACH UT4 F F F F F
F F RESTORATION F F F F
y O 0.00-&00 F F F F m
D / % F F F
B-
} O� _-540 540
O i � X57 EACH U74 S40
`� ✓ \ LP RESTORATION
-✓
\ 539.8 \ 0.6o--H A,VB/ENT X59
c oO ucE x XSB ® �OLp
\ \ p LP �x - 539.4 X510
X / P ✓� 5k�� LP k
�P LOG xs9/10
540 539.8 //i RP Oop
AW-2 W B Q
WB 540- \ �,
UP-/4
550 55G
545 545
LEFT TOP OF BANK
RIGHT TOP OF BANK
540 — — — 54G
T — — f`L & �L >� — 7R — ^ 1— — r` LRr LRT
EXISTING GROUND
535 535
536 w e a
O O + + N N W W C C G1 GN a1
O N O N O N O N O N O N O HORIZONiPl SCAtE
O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 inc - 30 ft.
M1]
•.....• � � esancu sots
rrl 11 trrrrrr`r
ft.
S4
v
J
O
O
�o
Jov
o0t:
Z�ov
Z
C�2
Q
0t:
o
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20 UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
UITE A
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
704-662-0100
FIRM At F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
4 OF 10
Book No. -

LCE LCE LCE
1
I
v � /
o
�� p• 539.5
V540.3 540.3
gyp. Q 539.5 539.5 s.00-11.ss s> ^'SxO. /539-��
o' o
539s 1 �oxo
LP LOG
539.6 (P�
�X°
CROSSING STREAM 6J8
LOG
539-
EACH ura
RESTORATION IT-
5+00-11+6567
539.3 539.8/
UP-6 S /
�— -540 ryyx /
y�
545
540
535
530
545
540
535
530
m m V V 4 4 b O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g
O
$
g
$
m
0a 15 0
naRaonru scats
1 Inc - 30 ft.
]
•';.,�
••.�.
esRn�eu sots
S5
v
\J
V
�\
fh
1
O
J
a�
Zoo
C�2
Z
O
v
�
�
�
v
Q
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20 UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
UITE A
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
5 OF 10
Book No. -

BASIS ONBD 83�2011)
NC GRID,
SCE
\ DCE
J
\ ,,JJ / rg 3 MATCy /yE S74.
U 24" CPP \SS 43
\ / s INV: 547.63'
+ / 24" CI * 542.4 j
INV: 57
7.22' 9N� I
546.6 LP I
XS1
a i
547.6 O w Loa j Loci � a �
542.6 1 RESTORATI43ON0�00-4+35.
\ LOG
/ LOG 54s,
\\k` �\ X 4 5g6 WD RP
\\ \ 24" CPP 549- \ REACH UI \ \ RPM i.
j
hhh yJ INV: 546.85' \ 3
,j RESTORATION WD j
24" CPP o+oo-a+as.aa
INV: 547.19' \
30, �
555 555
�I
550 550
LEFT TOP OF BANK
-- �T
545 EXISTING GROUND T RIGHT TOP OF BANK 545
\ — —
� L— Li
540 540
535 535
]0 15 ]0
530 530
O O N N W W
HORI^ONiPl SCAa:
d + - 30 ft.
O O O O O O O O O aWi ]
••....• eslencu sots
S6
�J
J
J
O�
O
Zoo
Z
Q
v
v
O
\
O
W
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20 UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn By
TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked
By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
6 OF 10
Book No. —

p
4T
MA LINE STA: 14+09.14
w
_ -541
CROSSINGTCH
STREAM I
/
�
�_ -53
'A
,540.4 LP STREAM
\
T BOG/
c3 a540.3
>c 0` CROSSING
%
�1
� XS5 X56 Loc
LP/ Lp/
.538.4
.A r
%FooO\�.540-
\ �, I -540� T
iii7
/ i539.8Lp
a539.4
XS4
/ 12+00
REACH
RESTORATION
5+82G,-14+p9.14
�\
LOG XSJ
RP \
/
/540
9
—539
i\ 0
/
RESTORATION
5—SI-14+A14
/
/
.539
16-
^
RP �Loc 9 \ L-
m mRP /
r
—SqO .�
r —
WD
� �
\ �- v .540.9 -540
^
-4
AW-7
W F�
�
\
�^
301
/
-
` •••••••
rllllr
RJR —.1- scN E
0
�ER^CPE SCALE
i tl� - 3 f[.
6
555
555
550
550
545
545
LEFT
TOP
OF BANK
RIGHT TOP OF BANK
540
_
540
_
_
ttr
=
_
Lr
_c
RT
-
-
-rr�tT
-LT
_
EXISTING
GROUND
535
535
ELL530
GN al al
V
+ 4 4 b b O
O
N
N W
530
N � �
�
+ + + + 8
iS
8 iS
8
iS 8
iS
o a
S7
OI
J
I
O
- J
j�
Jov
v
v
O
v
0
W
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20 UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
704-662-0100
FIRM At F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job IN
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked
By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
7 OF 10
Book No. -

�tiO�1
0
P �„`
I G
-543
i
y9 - k�. —
s4r
—540- —�
�Ax 540
539
\
538 \ GE
>"0 `1J \ s540.4 EACH BACK CREEK
GCS \ \ ENHANCEMENiII
30+13.]5-32+25.]8
536 ny
\ \540�540 /
/ s
REACH BACKCREEK +00
ENHANCEMENT II
24+483s-2]+6316 x 539.7
A / 1 535, / �}
535
\VAsjis� /�i iJ r" j 5� �a"` 540.3
542.3
.540.3 �
.538.4 h J
540
+539.4
540
535
530
GCS
511 '
J
XS1J ��
LP X514
hh.5 1"
GJhh h0.
hgN O
n LP
oc
AS '�
aa- — —
LOG ` L \ y
S \
LOG oc
X513
/7P
ACHUT6A \
1ro299-2+5747
555
550
545
540
--_m N + N N V V V W W N N '�
N N N
iS o o
BACK PROFILE (24f48.,39 - 27f6.3.16) BACK PROFILE 30*1,3.75 - 32*25.78) UT-6 PROFILE (1f02.99 - 2*57.47)
0o 15 0
HORI^ONiAL SCALE
3
—AL S-
-3ft.
aw asp
540 540
535 535
530 530
540 555
535 550
530 545
525 540
SS
J
J
OM
r
"V
1
Z
ono
Q
Z
Z
W
�
boa
Z
�
o
�L-Lj
Z
is
�
v
O
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20
UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
UITE A
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn
By
TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
8 OF 10
Book No. -

a542.4 / A�
SR
REACH BACK K
ENCEMENT 11
)+5346-13+51 p2
2
a542.3 \ \
a 542.5
544- —
/ 70 a
a542.3
e �
EACH BACK CREEK
T /5 ENHANCEMENT II
} 7+5346-13+51 p2
W /
550
545
540
535
530
550
545
540
535
530
525
O O O O O
O
+
+
N
W
tW
AL
�y '••• HORIZ�iAL SC
ft.
S9
�
J
J
,�
ov
Zoo
��v
�s
�
�
o
o
Z
0
Q
Z
cl-
O
�
v
0
W
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20 UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
UITE A
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn
By TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
Scale
VARIES
Sheet No.
9 OF 10
Book No. —

0
Co
0
AC H BACKCREEK OJa
_o-Mloo
L/ GJAM
rn /
o
0
moo
TTT
_ TTT
T T T
T T T T T T
O T
O
T T T T T
T T T T
T T T T
♦♦•••,, ]O0 15 ]0
rr1111rrrrrr�r
HORIZONTAL SCALE
I intli - 30 R.
S�
�J
J
J
Z
J
J
O
Z
Is
�
O
O
C V\1
V
O
v
0
W
REVISION
DATE
DESCRIPTION
07/20/20
UPDATED WETLAND AREA
WSP USA Inc.
UITE A
MOORESVILLE, NC 28117
MO TEEM L ROAD, 117
704-662-0100
FIRM # F-0165
Drawn By
TCB
Date
JULY 15, 2020
Job No.
193661C
Surveyed By MB/LG
Checked By BWC
1"
Scale
= 301.
Sheet No.
10 OF 10
Book No. —

CLOUD & BANNER
MITIGATION SITE
tt twat 90
1
i
1
L
© 2010 NAVTEQ © 2017 Microsoft Corporation 4p o rg
VICINITY MAP
NTS
PROJECT DIRECTORY
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3000 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27G 12
SURVEYED BY:
WSP USA INC.
128 TALBERT ROAD, SUITE A
MOORESVILLE, NC 281 17
(704)GG 2-01 00
PROJECT TOPOGRAPHY AND AS -BUILT PLANIMETRICS
SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY WSP USA INC. (NC FIRM
LICENSE NUMBER F-0 I G5, BARRY W. CREED, NC PLS
L-477G), DATED JUNE 12, 2020
CLOUD & BANNER RECORD DRAWINGS
ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN HUC: 0303002
JULY 2020
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
'::�ITF NAAP
IV I J
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler Environmental LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
6i
Q O
N
O
� N
O O
J N
U)
>Z
0= Q
0
Z
0 0
O
U) 0-'
U)
w O
>
w
J U
w w
Iz
Iz 0-1
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

550
545
540
535
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING TOP OF BANK - - - - - TB
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
n
Z
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
`I
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE -
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK _
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
i
LEFT
A -BUILT
RI HT
PROPOSED
TOP OF
PROPOSED
BED
AN
S-
OP
UILT
DF EANK
OP
DF B
NK
I
RT
IT—
LT
S-B I LT
ED
i
I
Vt�V ItVV It�V CtVV Ct�V _�tUU _�t�V
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
.'+t-1)v
550
545
540
535
6 +00
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK - - - - TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE —
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
0
LICE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
Ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q0
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
z_
oC Q
O
LL
0
z
LL, q
O
U) 0-'
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w w
Q
(D
Z
Z
J
O
U
0
0
O
p
U
Z
LU
�
Z
Q
w
w
Z
z
�
O
Z
Q
U
m
W
U
w
Z
LU
J
U O
Q
CD
Z_
ILL]
° U
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S 1

550
545
540
535
' 11
540_�
CA
1 \
V STREAM \ ��
CROSSING
LOG
i
LICE
LICE
LC; t
ILIA L
� Q
/ Q�
REACH UT4 V1
RESTORATION 1kO0 11 +34.4�/ p
I ,\ 11+85.67 �5�0_ %539 v
540 539
O
XS12 G ^� —
XS11 LP
LP
539
`T ` � `1
,• �►��
U
RESTORATION
..
STAGE
RECORDER /
Q�
xOQ
� V /
OG
LOG
/
23k0�
I
�
AS-BV ILT EFT
TOP TF B NK
17
I
-BUILT
OP
RIGHT
DF B NK
PR POSED
TOF OF BANK
PR POSED
BED
RT —�
-
—_
—
—
—
_
—
—
L'I'
1�
RT
LT
—_
g�
LT
LT--_
n
AS -BUILT BED
6 +00
�t�v itvv it�v otvv ot�v �tvv �t�v
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
I V t -1) V
I I five
550
545
540
535
1 2 +00
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 -
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR —
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF —
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK _
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE —
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK _
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
LICE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
LLI
Q O
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
CD
Z_
OC Q
O
LL
0
z
o q
O
U) 0-'
U)
w O
U
>
Lu
J
Lu LU
Q
(D
z
Z
J
O
Q
Q
U
0
0
O
O
U
z
LU
Q
z
w
Z
D
mow//
L.1_
O
Z
Q
U
m
W
U
w
Z
LU
J
I-
U O
Q
O
Z_
LL]
° U
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

DOUBLE 24'' RCP CULVERTS
ADDED TO DESIGN AFTER
FINAL MITIGATION APPROVAL
555
550
545
540
535
uct
CE
24" CPP
INV: 547.63' /
I 24'$ CIDP �� I
INV: 547.22' gtx
L
_ LOGJ
548�
1 54,9 —
uct
BATCH
s�A
� �/NE STA
4f36
SAS u u
u\
u
u u 11K�
43
IXS%
LP
XS2
1
\
/
KZ / `�
/ LOG`
\
LOG
w w
w
w
FLO
. �.
\
LOG
GAUGE
_ i ! '�
�s
EACH UT2-A
RESTORATION
XS2^
A
0+00 - 4+36.43
\546�
LOG
545 RP
v
v
v v v v
v v
v
v
v
v
S
WD
REACH UT2-A \
RP
RESTORATION
W D
0+00 - 4+36.43
u
u
LOG SILL SHIFTED UPSTREAM TO
ALLOW CHANNEL TOP OF BANK TO
VP-12
MATCH EXISTING FLOODPLAIN
PROPOSED
TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED
BED
I
II
-BUILT
P
L
F B
FT
N K
V
I/
i
<�
�
T
T
RIG
T
c�
N.
T`
AS -BUILT
TOP OF
A
NK
-BULTB
D
Ll
T
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
_-)t-1)v
.'+t-1)v
555
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
50
TB
EXISTING WETLAND W W W
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF _
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE —
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK y
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
550 I AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
545
540
535
5 +00
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
LC E
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
NC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
u.i
Q o
0 N
0
N
O N
J N
CD
Z_
oC Q
O
LL
0
Z
0 0
O
U) 0-'
U
w O
U
>
J
W
Ir 0-1
Q
(D
Z
z
J
O
Q
Q
U
0
0
Q
00
N
w
LU
U
z
Q
z
D
W
O
z
Q
m
W
U
2
z
LU
J
Q
0
0
O p
Q
Z_
ILL]
° U
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

LOG SILL SHIFTED UPSTREAM
ALLOW CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
MATCH EXISTING FLOODPL
555
550
MN
'431•1
535
-BUILT RIGHT
POFB NK
AS-BUi
TOP OF
F-F
LT L FT
PRO
TOP
OS
OF
D
ANK
PRO
BED
OS
D
A
BA
K
-
\
-
1
tZ.
-
AS
BUILT
BE
5+50 G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 5+00 (13+50
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
I VtuU
555
550
545
535
10+50
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR — —
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND W W W
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF —
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK _
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
e'
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE ME-
4
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE —
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER O
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS-BU I LT WETLAND
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
u.i
Q o
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
CD
z
o= Q
0
0
z
0 0
O
U) 0-'
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w Ill
0= IY
Q
(D
Z
Z
J
O
Q
Q
U
0
0
�
�
U
OZ
N
U
�
w
U
W
Q
z
O
Q
U
om
W
06Z
U
w
LU
J
Q
0
0
0 O
Q
zLU
J
J
° U
Q
Ir
0_
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

555
550
545
540
535
I[�
i
0
•
336
C'T.4 • 14+09.14
-REAL UT2-C
EESTORATION
5+92.31 - 14+09.14
DESIGN ALIGNMENT SHIFTED
AWAY FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTY AFTER FINAL
MITIGATION APPROVAL
I
�
PROFOSID
TOP OF ANK
PROPOSED
BED
AS -BUILT RIGHT
TIP O BANK
AS- UILTI LEFT
OPI BANK
I
--
—
lI
—
—
RT
_LT
IV
4
A
-BULTB
D
I I fiVV I I fi�V I L UU I Cfi�V I _�fiVV
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
II Mite- J
555
550
-540
535
I 0Z0]
DESIGN PROFILE/TOP OF
BANK NOT SHOWN. SEE
PLAN VIEW COMMENT
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR —50 —
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR - —
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND W W W
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF —
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE — —
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK i
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE —
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER O
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS-BU I LT WETLAND
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
li.i
Q o
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
C�
z
oC Q
O
LL
0
z
LJJ
O
U)
U)
w O
U
>
J
W
Q
(D
z
Z
J
O
0
Q
Q
U
0
0
�
�
U
OZ
N
U
�
w
U
W
Q
LU
z
O
Q
U
m
w
U
w
Z
J
Q
H
H
U O
G
Q
0
z_
LU
° U
Q
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

LOG DROPS SPF% Grl ill I-r AI
REACH TC
CHANN
560
555
550
545
RESTORARTION
1 +02.99 - 2+57.47
PRO OS D
TOP OF AN
HT PRO OS D
BED
AS -BUILT LET
TOP OF B
AS -BUILT RI
LT TOP OF BAN
\�
T
RT
LT
BED
RT
AS-
UILT
I+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
560
555
550
545
3 +00
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR — 50
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR — — —
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND W W W
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
e'
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE —
4
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE —
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS-BU I LT WETLAND
LCE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q o
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
CD
Z_
OC Q
O
LL
0
Z
0 0
O
U) IY
U)
w O
U
>
w
J
w Ill
Q
(D
Z
J
jZ
O
�
Q
Q
U
0
0
�
Q
ULU
Z
Q
Z
L,LJ
W
Z
O
Z
Q
U
m
LU
U
w
Z
LU
J
U p
Q
O
Z_
W
0 U
Q
<
o_
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

550
545
540
535
530
24
J
i
AS
S-B
I LT L FT
B NK
OP GF
-BUILT
OFB
F
IGHT
TOP
NK
/
loll
Q�
RT.--
=
LT
T
—
L
RT
R
LT
/
/
LT—/
AS- UILT,BED
T
T_
+50 25+00
25+50
2G+00
2G+50
27+00
27+
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
550 550
545 545
540
535 535
530 530
50 3C
5q.0
I
I
AS-BL
I LT LEFT
TOP CFRANK
AS -BUILT
TOP OF
RIGHT
BA
K
�
T
T R
AS-E UILT BED
+00 30+50
3 1
+00 3 1
+50 32+00
32+
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
550
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50 —
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR - — —
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF —
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE —
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE
—
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
545
AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
'400]
535
.'. TO]
301
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
6i
Q o
0 N
0
N
O N
J N
(D
z
o= Q
O
0
z
LL, 0
O
U) 0-'
U)
w O
U
>
Lu
J
Lu LU
Q
(D
Z
Z
J
O
Q
U
0
0
O
O
W
U
Z
W
�
W
..
U
W
Z
U
Z
Q
m
Z
Q
U
m
W
06
U
Lu
Z
J
Q
0
U p
Q
CD
z_
LU J
J
�
U
Q
Ir
°
0_
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR — -
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
DROP
LOG JAM MOVED U, LOG -
DOWNSTREAM BEFORE BEING PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROPERLY ANCHORED. LOG �,, PROTECTION
JAM WAS PROPERLY
ANCHORED IN NEW LOCATION o PROPOSED LOG SILL
/ / 3`3 PROPOSED LOG VANE —
REACH BACK CREEK PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK _
34+00 - 38+00 /
/
/
/ PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
vC /�,
no'`x �� / ' PROPOSED LOG JAM
/ LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
:vp-#
MONITORING PLOT
Y Y Y Y Y Y J•
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
y y y AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
y y y
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT LCE
AS -BUILT WETLAND
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1,,=30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I`
1"
= HALF SCALE
w
H
Q o
o
� N
O N
J N
CD
Z_
OC Q
0
0
z
0
O
Q O
w
U
J
rV
V
Z
Z
J
O
Q
Q
U
0
0
O
O
L
U
Z
L
0�
L
U
W
Z
U
Z
Q
m
Z
Q
U
m
L
U
w
Z
Lu
z
Q
W O
Q
z
J
�
U
Q
Ir
0_
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

550
545
540
535
530
REACH BACK CREEK
ENHANCEMENTII
7+53.46 - 13+51.02
REACH BACK CREEK
ENHANCEMENTII
7+53.46 - 13+51.02
544---
-----81 -----8
LOG JAM
Tee / TB_ ---- TB--
---- TB
AS -BUILT LEFT
TOP OFB/,NK
AS-E�UI_Ti RIGHT
P OF BANK
I
—
—
�
—
—
RT
—
RT
RT
LT
—
LT —
—
NI
_
_
7/7
LT
— —
_—
—
—
— —
--
R
_
_
RT — —
RT
—
R T
--
_ T
\
—UT
LT
S-B
I LT 5ED
-7,
F-
I
7+50
otvv ot�v �tvv �t�v Ivtvv Ivt�v Iltvv
SCALE: HOR 1''=30'; VERT 1''=3'
I I t -1) V
I C t -1) V
I _-) t uu
550
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR — -
EXISTING TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
EXISTING WETLAND
PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF —
CHANNEL
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED DIFFUSE
FLOW STRUCTURE
PROPOSED BRUSH TOE
PROPOSED DOUBLE
LOG DROP
PROPOSED LOG TOE
PROTECTION
PROPOSED LOG SILL
PROPOSED LOG VANE —
PROPOSED LOG J-HOOK _
PROPOSED RIFFLE
GRADE CONTROL
PROPOSED LOG JAM
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — — TB
AS -BUILT CENTERLINE —
AS -BUILT CROSS-SECTION
AS -BUILT STAGE RECORDER O
AS -BUILT FLOW GAUGE
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE
545 I AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
540
535
530
13+50
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
Ores
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
INC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
C)
FULL SCALE: 1 "= 30
0
30 60
2"
= FULL SCALE
I\
1"
= HALF SCALE
W
H
Q O
0 N
O
N
O N
J N
CD
Z_
oC Q
O
LL
0
Z
0 0
O
U) 0-'
O
w U
W
J
W Ill
(�
Q
(D
Z
Z
J
�
O
0
U
0
0
O
O
L
U
Z
L
0�
L
U
W
Z
U
Z
Q
m
Z
Q
U
m
L
U
W
Z
LU
J
0 O
Q
CD
Z_
LU
° U
Q
Ir
0_
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S9

I I
I I
I I
- \
P-12
WD
may/
-�O-A
_ —� OI/P-5
TB--
i
i
In / J
� I/P—a
O
WE / //
J
1 Y
___ AGE
❑ VP— 10
— TB 6' /
LEGEND
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
EXISTING WETLAND
AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK
AS -BUILT VEGETATION
MONITORING PLOT
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
AS -BUILT WETLAND
— — — — TB
LCE
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
PLANTING TABLE
Riparian Planting
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
i 5%
River birch
Betula nigra
i%
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
i 0%
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
i 0%
o
Yellow poplar
Linodendron tulipifera
i 0%
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
__5%
Rani Paw_
Ag:w,:. ;; 4;4gi.a
Pin Oak
Quercus palustris
10%
Red Mulberry
Morus rubra
8%
Southern Crabapple
Malus angusifolia
8%
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
7%
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
5%
Silky Dogwood
Corpus amomum
3%
10%
7%
18%
14%
5%
5%
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh,
NC 27612
Main:
919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
Angler
Environmental,
LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
FULL SCALE: 1 "=150
0
150
300
2
FULL SCALE
I`
1"
= HALF SCALE
Li
Q o
o
� N
O N
J N
z
Q
oc
o
0
z
�i.0 0
O
U)
Q
w
U
(D
z
z
O
z
0
LU
�
U
2
0
�
J
O
m
U
zz
Q
LU
W
z
w
o
z
Q
U
z
m
W
J
z
J
LU
Q
~
C
U p
Q
Z_
LU
U
Q
o
PROJECT NUMBER:
----
PROJECT MANAGER:
KAW
DESIGNED:
WKD
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
W 1