19980066 Ver 1_Complete File_19980127

US 401
From SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road)
Louisburg
Franklin County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-401(8)
State Project No. 8.1360701
TIP Project R-2814 E
i
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Approved:
• 3 -IF-17 U.
DATE La ?. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
J Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
r
3M/17 DATE L. Graf, P.E.
?cholas
vision Administrator, FHWA

US 401
From SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road)
Louisburg
Franklin County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-401(8)
State Project No. 8.1360701
TIP Project R-2814 E
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
MARCH, 1997
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By: I oil
'(N CAR p4
?.GSS/OA!
?r'?JJ ./•9 'vim
-,,?? -J
Edward B. McFalls, P.E. SEAL i
Project Planning Engineer 022546 t
y•?NGINE??'?Q?v?? `
8/9
?
W' son Stroud
Project Planning Unit Head
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.
II
III.
PAGE
SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS 1
NEE D FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT 2
A. General Description of the Project 2
B. Project Status and Historical Resume 2
C. Purpose of the Proposed Project 2
D. Existing Conditions 3
1. Length of Roadway Section Studied 3
2. Route Classification 3
3. Existing Typical Section 3
4. Existing Right of Way 3
5. Access Control 3
6. Speed Limits 3
7. Bridges and Drainage Structures 3
8. Traffic Data 4
9. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature 4
10. Intersecting Roadways 4
11. Degree of Roadside Interference 5
12. Railroad Crossings 5
13. School Bus Information 5
14. Airports 5
15. Geodetic Markers 5
16. Sidewalks 6
E. Capacity Analysis 6
1. Mainline Analysis 6
2. Intersection Analyses 6
F. Accident Analysis 9
G. Project Terminii 10
H. Thoroughfare Plan 10
1. Benefits to the State, Region, and Community 10
J. Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Area 10
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 11
A. General Description 11
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE
IV
V
B. Length of the Proposed Project
C. Proposed Typical Section
D. Design Speed 12
E. Right of Way 12
F. Access Control 12
G. Intersection Treatments 12
1. SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) 12
2. NC 56 / SR 1229 (South Main Street) 12
3. Edward Lane 13
4. NC 39 (Bunn Road) 13
5. Median Openings 13
H. Drainage Structures 13
I. Special Permits Required 13
J. Changes to the State Highway System 14
K. Sidewalks 14
L. Landscaping 14
M. Noise Barriers 14
N. Degree of Utility Conflicts 14
0. Cost Estimates 14
P. Anticipated Design Exceptions 15
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION 15
A. Recommended Improvements 15
B. Design Alternatives 15
1. Widening Alternatives 15
2. Alternative US 401 / NC 56 Intersection Design 16
C. Postponement of the Proposed Action 16
D. "Do Nothing" Alternative 16
E. Alternative Modes of Transportation 16
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 16
A. Social Effects 16
1. Land Use 16
2. Relocatees 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE
3. Environmental Justice 17
4. Public Facilities 17
5. Historic and Cultural Resources 18
a. Architectural/Historical Resources 18
b. Archaeological Resources 18
• 6. Section 4(f) Properties 19
B. Economic Effects 19
C. Environmental Effects 19
1. Biotic Resources 19
a. Terrestrial Communities 20
b. Aquatic Communities 22
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Resources 23
2. Threatened and Endangered Species 24
a. Federally Protected Species 25
b. Federal Species of Concern and State Protected Species 27
3. Water Resources 28
a. Characteristics of Water Resources 28
b. Best Usage Classification 29
C. Water Quality 29
d. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources 30
4. Jurisdictional Wetlands 31
5. Permits 32
6. Soils 33
7. Flood Hazard Evaluation 33
• 8. Stream Modification 34
9. Farmland 34
10. Traffic Noise 34
11. Air Quality Analysis 34
12. Hazardous Materials and Storage Tanks 35
13. Construction Impacts 35
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
PAGE
VI. Comments and Coordination 37
A. Comments Received from Federal, State, and Local Agencies 37
B. Citizens Informational Workshop 37
C. Public Hearing 38
VII. Conclusion 38
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Aerial Mosaic
Figure 3 Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Figure 4 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Figure 5 Existing Intersection Configuration (US 401 / NC 56 / SR 1229)
Figure 6 Proposed Intersection Configuration (US 401 / NC 56 / SR 1229)
Figure 7 Louisburg Thoroughfare Plan
Figure 8 Proposed Typical Sections
Figure 9 Location of Wetlands and Stream Resources
Figure 10 Approximate Floodplain Limits
TABLES
Table I Levels of Service on US 401 6
Table 2 Average Vehicle Delays at the Intersection of 8
US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 (Existing Configuration)
Table 3 Average Vehicle Delays at the Intersection of 8
US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 (Proposed Configuration)
Table 4 Accident Rate Summary 9
Table 5 TIP Project R-2814 Information I 1
Table 6 Project Costs 14
Table 7 Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities 23
Table 8 Federally Protected Species for Franklin County 25
Table 9 Federal Species of Concern for Franklin County 27
Table 10 Stream Resource Information 28
Table 11 Soils Located in the Project Study Area 33
APPENDICES

Appendix A Comments from Federal, State, and Local Agencies
Appendix B Citizens Informational Workshop Information
US 401
From SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road)
Louisburg
Franklin County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-401(8)
State Project No. 8.1360701
TIP Project R-2814 E
1. SPECIAL PROJECT COMMITMENTS
A. The proposed project will impact four geodetic survey markers. The North Carolina
Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to project construction at Post Office Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611.
B. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct, a permit will be
required from the United States Army Corps of Engineers for the proposed project. A Section
404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(x) (23) will likely be applicable for all impacts to Waters
of the United States found in the project study area.
C. This project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ prior to the
issuance of the Nationwide Permit.
D. A copy of NCDOT's Pedestrian Policy Guidelines has been forwarded to the Town of
Louisburg. If the Town of Louisburg requests sidewalks and submits the documentation outlined
in the guidelines, NCDOT will consider their request.
E. The Town of Louisburg has landscaped the existing intersection of US 401, NC 56 and
SR 1229. As requested by the Town, NCDOT will retain as much of the existing landscaping as
possible. In addition, prior to construction, NCDOT will give the Town an opportunity to
relocate plantings that would otherwise be destroyed by the proposed project and coordinate any
NCDOT landscaping plans with them.
F. According to General Statute 136-27.1., the North Carolina Department of
Transportation shall pay the nonbetterment cost for the relocation of the water and sewer lines
that are located within existing NCDOT right of way, since they are owned by the Town of
Louisburg, which has a population of less than 5500 persons.
G. During design phase, efforts will be made to avoid the above ground and underground
storage tanks located along the project.
H. In order to minimize impacts to water resources in the entire impact area and because of
the presence of the Tar spinymussel proposed critical habitat, NCDOT's Best Management
Practices (BMPs) for the Protection of Surface Waters and High Quality Water (HQW)
guidelines (Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds) will be strictly enforced during the entire
life of the project.
1. Since approximately 100 m (328 feet) of stream relocation is necessary, NCDOT will
coordinate with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission with reference to the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (stream relocation guidelines).
II. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
A. General Description of the Project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to symmetrically
widen US 401 to a multilane curb and gutter facility from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to
NC 39 (Bunn Road). Between SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) and a point approximately
880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road), a four-lane divided roadway is
proposed with a raised median varying in width from 1.2 m (4-feet) to 9 m (29.5 feet).
From 880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road),
US 401 will be widened to a five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter facility with a center
left turn lane. Also as a part of the project, the intersection of US 401, NC 56, and
SR 1229 will be reconfigured. NCDOT plans to create two "T" intersections at this
location. In the vicinity of this intersection, both directions of US 401 will be routed to
follow an alignment that will follow the present alignment of the northbound lane of
US 401. NC 56 will be extended to intersect US 401, and SR 1229 (Main Street) will be
realigned to intersect NC 56. The project is located within the town limits of Louisburg
in Franklin County and is approximately 1.1 km (0.7 mile) in length. The project's
location is shown on the vicinity map included as Figure 1. The proposed improvements
to US 401 are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this report and are shown
in Figure 2.
B. Project Status and Historical Resume
The proposed project is included in the 1997-2003 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). The 1997-2003 TIP includes $ 100,000 for right of way acquisition,
which is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1998, and $ 1,500,000 for construction, which
is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1999. Thus, the TIP includes a total funding of
$ 1,600,000 for the proposed project.
Construction and right of way estimates were updated during the planning
process. The current right of way cost estimate is $ 450,000. The current construction
cost estimate is $ 2,300,000. The total estimated cost of the proposed project is
$ 2,750,000, which is $ 1,150,000 more than the amount programmed in the TIP.
C. Purpose of the Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide safer and more efficient travel
through the area by increasing the traffic carrying capacity of the subject section of
US 401 and improving the existing channelized intersection of US 401, NC 56, and
SR 1229. The construction of an additional through lane in each direction of travel and
the proposed provisions for left turning cars will accommodate the anticipated increase in
traffic volumes and will improve the level of service of the facility (see Section II.E.).
The reconfigured intersection of US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 will provide motorists a
more efficient and safer intersection. The new intersection will provide a higher level of
2
service, and, since its design is simpler than the existing design, accidents related to
driver confusion will be reduced.
D. Existing Conditions
Length of Roadway Section Studied
Planning and environmental studies were conducted on US 401 from SR
1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road), a length of 1.1 km (0.7 mile).
2. Route Classification
US 401 is classified as a rural minor arterial in the statewide functional
classification system.
3. Existing Typical Section
US 401 is a two-lane roadway with a 6.7 in (22-foot) travelway. The
existing roadway has 2.4 in (8-foot) shoulders; 0.9 in (3 feet) of each shoulder is
paved.
4. Existing Right of Way
The existing right of way width on this section of US 401 is 30.5 in (100
feet).
5. Access Control
US 401 has no access control in the vicinity of the proposed project.
6. Speed Limits
The speed limit on US 401 is 72 km/h (45 mph).
7. Bridges and Drainage Structures
One drainage structure is located along this section of US 401. An
intermittent stream, located approximately 9 in (30 feet) north of Edward Lane, is
crossed by US 401. The drainage structure at this stream crossing is a 2.4 in X 1.8
m (8 ft. X 6 ft.) corrugated metal arch culvert. This arch culvert is hydraulically
adequate for the anticipated discharge at this location and appears to be in good
structural condition. Therefore, this culvert will be retained and extended.
8. Traffic Data
In 1999, the anticipated construction year of the proposed project, the
average daily traffic along the proposed project is anticipated to vary from 8,800
vehicles per day (on US 401 between SR 1700 and NC 56) to 15,320 vehicles per
day (on US 401, just north of the US 401/NC 56/SR 1229 intersection). In 2019,
the average daily traffic along this section of US 401 is anticipated to vary from
13,480 vehicles per day (on US 401 between SR 1700 and NC 56) to 23,280
vehicles per day (on US 401, just north of the US 40I NC 56/SR 1229
intersection). Projected average daily traffic volumes for the years 1999 and 2019
are shown in Figures 3A and 313, respectively. Truck percentages are also shown
on this figure. Peak hour data for the years 1999 and 2019 are shown in Figures
4A and 413, respectively.
9. Horizontal and Vertical Curvature
US 401 traverses rolling terrain. Sight distance is not limited by
horizontal and vertical curves.
10. Intersecting Roadways
Four intersections are located along the proposed project. Each of these
intersections is discussed below.
SR 1700 (Fox Park Road)
The intersection of US 401 and SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) is the southern
terminal of the proposed project. The intersection is not signalized.
SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) is a two-lane roadway; no left turn lanes are
currently provided on any of the intersection approaches. A stop sign is
located on SR 1700 (Fox Park Road).
NC 56 / SR 1229 (South Main Street)
The intersection of US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 (South Main Street) is a
complicated, unsignalized intersection. Traffic movements are
channelized through the intersection and are controlled by several stop and
yield signs. A detail of the intersection is included as Figure 5. Only one
traffic movement, traffic moving north of US 401, can proceed through the
intersection without stopping or turning.
Edward Lane
Edward Lane is a two-lane road that intersects US 401 near the northern
terminal of the proposed project. The intersection is not signalized and
4
none of the intersection approaches have been widened to accommodate
left turn lanes. A stop sign is located on Edward Lane.
NC 39 (Bunn Road)
The intersection of US 401 and NC 39 (Bunn Road), a four-leg, signalized
intersection, is the northern terminal of the proposed project. The
northbound, eastbound, and westbound approaches to this intersection
each have one through-right lane and a left turn lane. The southbound
approach to this intersection has one through lane, a left turn lane, and a
right turn lane.
11. Degree of Roadside Interference
Roadside interference is moderate along US 401 between SR 1700 (Fox
Park Road) and NC 39 (Bunn Road). Several businesses with one or more
driveways are located along this section of roadway.
12. Railroad Crossings
No railroad crossings are located along the proposed project.
13. School Bus Information
Information about the proposed project was forwarded to Franklin County
Schools. Mr. Russell E. Allen, the school superintendent, discussed the project
with Mr. Rick Smith, the Director of Transportation. Neither Mr. Allen nor Mr.
Smith feel that the proposed project will impact bus transportation in the area.
Moreover, the proposed project will not affect any existing or proposed school
sites.
14. Airports
No airports are located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project.
Franklin County Airport is located approximately 5 km (3 miles) west of the
proposed project and Ball Airport is located approximately 6 km (4 miles) north
of the proposed project. The proposed project will not affect these airports.
15. Geodetic Markers
The proposed project will impact four geodetic survey markers. The
North Carolina Geodetic Survey will be contacted prior to project construction at
the following address:
North Carolina Geodetic Survey
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
16. Sidewalks
No sidewalks are located along this section of US 401.
E. Capacity Analysis
The traffic carrying capacity of a roadway is described with a level of service
rating, a qualitative measure of the roadway's operational conditions and how these
conditions are perceived by motorists. Level of service is determined using conditions
such as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, convenience, and
safety. Six levels of service are defined and are assigned letter designations from A to F.
Level of service A represents the best operating conditions, and level of service F
represents the worst operating conditions.
Using the traffic data described in Section II.D.8. and included in Figures 3 and 4,
capacity analyses for the years 1999 and 2019 were performed for US 401 between SR
1700 (Fox Park Road) and NC 39 (Bunn Road). These capacity analyses were done using
both the existing and proposed lane configurations.
1. Mainline Analysis
Mainline capacity analyses were performed for US 401. The results of
these analyses are summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1. LEVELS OF SERVICE ON US 401
EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
1999 2019 1999 2019
E E A B
These results illustrate that the proposed project will improve the level of
service on this section of US 401. If the proposed improvements are not made,
US 401 will operate at level of service E. With the proposed improvements, the
facility will operate at level of service B in the design year.
2. Intersection Analyses
Capacity analyses were performed for the two major intersections located
along the project. The intersection of US 401 and NC 39 was analyzed in both the
construction year and design year as a signalized intersection. The intersection of
US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 was analyzed as a series of unsignalized
6
intersections in the construction year and as a signalized intersection in the design
year. The results of these analyses are discussed below in the next two sections.
a. Intersection of US 401 and NC 39
Capacity analyses were conducted for the intersection of US 401
and NC 39 with and without the proposed improvements in the
construction year 1999 and the design year 2019. The existing intersection
would provide a level of service of C in the construction year 1999. The
existing intersection would provide a level of service of E in the design
year 2019. With the proposed improvements, the intersection will
function at level of service B in the construction year, 1999, and level of
service D in 2019, the design year.
b. Intersection of US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229
The existing intersection consists of several unsignalized
intersections controlled by yield and stop signs (see Figure 5). In order to
compare this intersection with the proposed intersection configuration,
average vehicle delays were calculated for motorists travelling through the
intersection. Table 2 summarizes the number of stops and the delays
experienced by each movement. The reported delays do not include the
time it would take to proceed from one unsignalized intersection to the
next or the delay experience at yield signs; the delay reported is just the
delay experienced at stop signs within the intersection.
The proposed configuration of the intersection of US 401,
SR 1229, and NC 56 consists of a signalized intersection at the junction of
US 401 and NC 56 and an unsignalized intersection at the junction of
NC 56 and SR 1229 (as described in Section III.G.2. and shown in Figures
2 and 6). The delays and levels of service experienced by each movement
are summarized in Table 3. Together, the two intersections are anticipated
to operate at level of service B in the design year 2019.
The two tables illustrate that, for the most part, in the design year,
the average vehicular delays experienced for each traffic movement are
significantly less with the proposed intersection configuration.
7
TABLE 2. AVERAGE VEHICLE DELAYS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
US 401, NC 56, AND SR 1229 (EXISTING CONFIGURATION)
MOVEMENT NO. OF TOTAL DELAY IN SECONDS / VEHICLE LEVEL OF SERVICE
STOPS
REQUIRED IN 1999 IN 2019 IN 1999 IN 2019
Traffic continuing north on US 401 0 0 0 A A
Traffic continuing south on US 401 1 9 26 B D
Traffic moving from eastbound 2 15 47 C F
NC 56 to northbound US 401
Traffic moving from eastbound 1 7.5 30 B D
NC 56 to southbound US 401
Traffic moving from eastbound 2 14.5 43 C E
NC 56 to northbound SR 1229
Traffic moving from southbound 0 0 0 A A
SR 1229 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from southbound 1 7.5 17 B C
SR 1229 to northbound US 401
Traffic moving from southbound 0 0 0 A A
SR 1229 to southbound US 401
Traffic moving from northbound 3 20 45 C E
US 401 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from northbound 2 11 19 C C
US 401 to northbound SR 1229
Traffic moving from southbound 1 9 26 B D
US 401 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from southbound 0 0 0 A A
US 401 to northbound SR 1229
TABLE 3. AVERAGE VEHICLE DELAYS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
US 401, NC 56, AND SR 1229 (PROPOSED CONFIGURATION)
MOVEMENT TOTAL DELAY IN SECONDS / LEVEL OF SERVICE
VEHICLE
IN 1999 IN 2019 IN 1999 IN 2019
Traffic continuing north on US 401 5.3 5.8 B B
Traffic continuing south on US 401 5.3 5.8 B B
Traffic moving from eastbound 9.6 10.4 B B
NC 56 to northbound US 401
Traffic moving from eastbound 8.8 9.3 B B
NC 56 to southbound US 401
Traffic moving from eastbound 3 4 A B
NC 56 to northbound SR 1229
Traffic moving from southbound 3.5 4 A B
SR 1229 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from southbound 11 26 B D
SR 1229 to northbound US 401
Traffic moving from southbound 16.8 31.3 C D
SR 1229 to southbound US 401
Traffic moving from northbound 5.5 7.5 B B
US 401 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from northbound 5.5 7.5 B B
US 401 to northbound SR 1229
Traffic moving from southbound 5.6 6.4 B B
US 401 to westbound NC 56
Traffic moving from southbound 5.6 6.4 B B
F. Accident Analysis
An accident study for US 401 was conducted by the Accident Studies Section of
the Traffic Engineering Branch of the North Carolina Department of Transportation for
the time period from June 1, 1991 to May 31, 1994. A summary of the accident rates (in
number of accidents per 100 million vehicle kilometers (ACC/100MVK)) is presented in
Table 4. In Table 4, these accident rates are compared to the average statewide accident
rates for two-lane, rural US routes.
TABLE 4. ACCIDENT RATE SUMMARY
Accident Type Rate Along US 401

ACC/100MVK * Average Statewide Rate for Rural,
Two-Lane US Routes
ACC/100MVK *
Total 490 107.77
Fatal 0 1.55
Non-fatal Injury 225 51.09
Wet 66 30.45
Night 119 25.79
ACC/100MVK = Accidents per 100 million vehicle miles
A total of thirty-seven accidents were reported on US 401 between SR 1700 (Fox
Park Road) and NC 39 (Bunn Road). None of these accidents were fatal. The total
accident rate on this section of US 401 (490 ACC/ 100MVM) is more than four times the
statewide average accident rate for rural, two-lane US routes. As shown in Table 4, the
non-fatal injury, wet, and night accident rates are also significantly higher than their
comparable average statewide rates.
The majority of the accidents along this section of US 401 occurred at its
intersections with NC 56 and NC 39. Sixteen accidents (43 percent of the total number of
accidents) occurred at the intersection of US 401 and NC 56. Eighteen accidents (49
percent of the total number of accidents) occurred at the intersection of US 401 and NC
39.
Accidents involving angle collisions accounted for 32.4 percent of the accidents
on this section of US 401. Accidents involving left turning vehicles also accounted for
32.4 percent of the accidents. Rearend collisions involving slowing or stopped vehicles
accounted for 16.2 percent of the accidents.
The proposed improvements will enhance the safety of this section of US 401.
The improvements proposed at the US 401 intersections with NC 56 and NC 39 (see
Section III.G. of this report), as well as the construction of a continuous left turn lane, are
anticipated to alleviate driver confusion and reduce accident rates.
9
G. Project Terminii
The southern terminal of the proposed project is the intersection of SR 1700 (Fox
Park Road) and US 401. At this terminal and south of it, US 401 is a two-lane roadway.
South of this terminal, an adjacent project, TIP Project R-2814, is anticipated to widen
US 401 to a four-lane divided facility with a 14 in (46-foot) median.
The northern terminal of the proposed project is the intersection of US 401 and
NC 39 (Bunn Road). Just north of this intersection, US 401 (South Bickett Boulevard) is
a five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter facility.
H. Thoroughfare Plan
This segment of US 401 is shown as a major thoroughfare in the Louisburg
Thoroughfare Plan adopted by the North Carolina Department of Transportation on
September 9, 1988. This thoroughfare plan is currently being updated. US 401 is
anticipated to remain classified as a major thoroughfare. A copy of the thoroughfare plan
is included as Figure 7.
Benefits to the State Region, and Community
The proposed improvements to US 401 will benefit the region and local
community by providing safer and more efficient travel. The increased capacity of
US 401 will enhance the accessiblity of properties located along the proposed project. In
addition, the improvements proposed as a part of this project, in conjunction with the
improvements anticipated to be constructed under TIP Projects R-2814 and R-2425, will
benefit the region by improving travel on US 401 between Raleigh and Louisburg.
Other Proposed Highway Improvements in the Area
TIP Project R-2814 calls for the widening of US 401 to multilanes from SR 2044
(Ligon Mill Road) in Wake County to SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) in Franklin County.
Planning studies for this project are underway. Besides TIP Project R-2814 E, TIP Project
R-2814 has four segments. The limits of and schedules for each of these segments are
presented in Table 5.
TIP Project R-2425 will widen US 401 from US 1 in Raleigh to SR 2044 (Ligon
Mill Road) to a multilane facility. Right of way acquisition for this project is underway.
Construction on this project is anticipated to begin in fiscal year 1997.
10
TABLE 5. TIP Project R-2814 Information
Project Limits of the Segment Right of Way Construction
Segment Acquisition Schedule
Schedule
R-2814 A SR 2044 (Wake Co.) to SR FY 2000 FY 2002
2226 Wake Co.
R-2814 B SR 2226 (Wake Co.) to NC 96 FY 2003 Post Year*
Wake Co.
R-2814 C NC 96 (Wake Co.) to SR 1103 Post Year* Post Year*
Franklin Co.
R-2814 D SR 1103 (Franklin Co.) to SR Post Year* Post Year*
1700 Franklin Co.
Post year projects are projects which are not currently funded within the years scheduled in the TIP.
However, the TIP is updated each year, and, as funds become available, post year projects may be funded.
III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
A. General Description
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to symmetrically
widen US 401 to a mulitlane curb and gutter facility from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to
NC 39 (Bunn Road). Between SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) and a point approximately
880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road), a four-lane divided roadway is
proposed with a raised median varying in width from 1.2 m (4 eet) to 9 m (29.5 feet).
From 880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road),
US 401 will be widened to a five-lane, undivided, curb and gutter facility with a center
left turn lane. Also as a part of the project, the intersection of US 401, NC 56, and
SR 1229 will be reconfigured. NCDOT plans to create two "T" intersections at this
location (see Figure 6). In the vicinity of this intersection, both directions of US 401 will
be routed to follow an alignment that will follow the present alignment of the northbound
lane of US 401 at the existing intersection. NC 56 will be realigned to intersect US 401,
and SR 1229 (Main Street) will be realigned to intersect NC 56. The recommended
improvements are shown in Figure 2.
B. Length of the Proposed Project
US 401 will be widened from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road), a
length of 1.1 km (0.7 mile).
C. Proposed Typical Section
Two typical sections will be used to widen this section of US 401. Between
SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) and a point approximately 880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700
(Fox Park Road), a four-lane divided roadway with a raised median varying in width from
1.2 in (4 feet) to 9 m (29.5 feet) will be constructed. The typical section will provide two
3.6 in (12-foot) through lanes in each direction and also allows for left turn lanes to be
provided at median openings. Proposed locations of median openings along the project
11
are discussed in Section III.G. of this report. From approximately 880 in (2890 feet)
north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road), a five-lane undivided facility
with a center left turn lane will be constructed. The two proposed typical sections are
shown in Figure 8.
D. Design Speed
The proposed design speed for the project is 80 km/h (50 mph).
E. Right of Way
The proposed project will only require minor amounts of additional right of way.
Additional right of way will be needed at US 401's intersections with SR 1700 (Fox Park
Road) and NC 39 (Bunn Road) in order to maintain sight distance. In addition, a 5 m
(16.4-foot) wide strip of additional right of way will be needed along the west side of SR
1229 (Main Street) for a distance of approximately 130 in (426 feet) and along the east
side of US 401 just north of SR 1700 for a distance of 70 m (230 feet). Construction
easements with widths ranging up to 15 in (49.2 feet) will be needed along both sides of
US 401 for the entire length of the proposed project. The approximate limits of the
existing and proposed right of way for the project are shown on Figure 2.
F. Access Control
US 401 has no contol of access in the vicinity of the proposed project. No
changes in access control are proposed as a part of this project.
G. Intersection Treatments
SR 1700 (Fox Park Road)
In the vicinity of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road), US 401 will be widened to a
four-lane divided faclity with a 9 in (29.5-foot) raised median. A median opening
and a left turn lane will be provided on US 401 at this intersection. No
improvements to SR 1700 are anticipated to be included as a part of the project.
2. NC 56 / SR 1229 (South Main Street)
The intersection of US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 will be reconfigured.
Two "T" intersections will be created at this location. Both directions of US 401
will be routed to follow an alignment that will follow the present alignment of the
northbound lane of US 401 at the existing intersection. NC 56 will be realigned
to intersect US 401, and SR 1229 (Main Street) will be realigned to intersect
NC 56. Figure 6 illustrates the reconfiguration of this intersection. A traffic
signal will be installed at the new intersection of US 401 and NC 56.
12
Edward Lane
In the vicinity of Edward Lane, US 401 will be widened to a five-lane
undivided facility with a center left turn lane. In addition, Edward Lane will be
slightly realigned so that it will intersect US 401 approximately 12 m (39 feet)
north of its existing intersection with the roadway. No other improvements to this
intersection are currently proposed.
4. NC 39 (Bunn Road)
NC 39 (Bunn Road) is the northern terminal of the proposed project. The
northbound approach will accommodate two northbound through lanes and a left
turn lane. A 1.2 m (4-foot) wide monolithic island will be constructed along the
last 40 m (131 feet) of this approach to the intersection. In addition, the
southbound approach to the intersection will be reconfigured to accommodate a
through-right lane, a through lane, and a left turn lane. No other improvements to
this intersection are anticipated.
5. Median Openings
The North Carolina Department of Transportation currently plans to
provide median openings at SR 1700 (Fox Park Road), NC 56, and the
southernmost entrance to the National Guard Armory. From 880 m (2890 feet)
north of SR 1700 to the northern project terminal, the proposed five-lane,
undivided typical section will provide a continuous center left turn lane that will
serve both directions of travel.
H. Drainage Structures
A 2.4 m X 1.8 m (8'X6') corrugated metal arch culvert is located approximately
9 m (10 feet) north of Edward Lane. The culvert is hydraulically adequate and will be
extended to accommodate the widening project. No other drainage structures are located
along the project.
1. Special Permits Required
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean WaterAct, a permit will
be required from the United States Army Corps of Engineers for the proposed project. A
Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (23) will likely be applicable for all
impacts to Waters of the United States found in the project study area. A 401 Water
Quality Certification from the Division of Water Quality will be required prior to the
issuance of the Nationwide Permit.
13
J. Changes to the State Highway System
No changes to the state highway system are proposed as a part of this project.
K. Sidewalks
No sidewalks are proposed as a part of TIP Project R-2814 E. A copy of
NCDOT's Pedestrian Policy Guidelines has been forwarded to the Town of Louisburg. If
the Town of Louisburg requests sidewalks and submits the documentation outlined in the
guidelines, NCDOT will consider the request.
L. Landscaping
The Town of Louisburg has landscaped the existing intersection of US 401,
NC 56 and SR 1229. As requested by the Town, NCDOT will retain as much of the
existing landscaping as possible. In addition, prior to construction, NCDOT will give the
Town an opportunity to relocate plantings that would otherwise be destroyed by the
proposed project and coordinate any NCDOT landscaping plans with them.
M. Noise Barriers
No noise barriers are proposed for this project.
N. Degree of Utility Conflicts
The proposed project is anticipated to have a medium impact on utilities in the
project vicinity. Normal coordination with appropriate utility companies will be required.
In addition, according to General Statute 136-27.1., the North Carolina Department of
Transportation shall pay the nonbetterment cost for the relocation of the water and sewer
lines that are located within the existing State highway right of way, since they are owned
by the Town of Louisburg, which has a population of less than 5500 persons.
0. Cost Estimates
Right of way and construction costs for the proposed project were updated during
the planning process. The table below presents the construction and right of way costs for
the proposed improvements.
TABLE 6. PROJECT COSTS
Project Costs
CONSTRUCTION $ 2,300,000
RIGHT OF WAY $ 450,000
TOTAL COST $ 2,750,000
14
P. Anticipated Design Exceptions
No design exceptions are anticipated as a part of the proposed project. If, during
the design process, any design exceptions are determined to be necessary, they will be
coordinated with the Federal Highway Administration.
IV. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
A. Recommended Improvements
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to symmetrically
widen US 401 to a mulitlane curb and gutter facility from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to
NC 39 (Bunn Road). Between SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) and a point approximately
880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road), a four-lane divided roadway is
proposed with a raised median varying in width from 1.2 m (4 feet) to 9 m (29.5 feet).
From 880 m (2890 feet) north of SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 (Bunn Road),
US 401 will be widened to a five-lane, undivided roadway with a center left turn lane.
Also as a part of the project, the intersection of US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 will be
reconfigured. NCDOT plans to create two "T" intersections at this location. In the
vicinity of this intersection, both directions of US 401 will be routed to follow an
alignment that will follow the present alignment of the northbound lane of US 401 at the
existing intersection. NC 56 will be realigned to intersect US 401, and SR 1229 (Main
Street) will be realigned to intersect NC 56.
B. Design Alternatives
1. Wideninp, Alternatives
The proposed improvements were selected after two widening alternatives
were considered for the proposed project. Initially, widening the subject section
of US 401 to a five-lane undivided facility was considered. This alternative
would provide two through lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane
serving both directions of traffic. This alternative would not change access to any
properties along the proposed project. When representatives of NCDOT
discussed the proposed project with representatives of the Town of Louisburg, the
Town requested consideration of a raised median along this section of US 401. In
a letter to NCDOT that is included as page A-4 in Appendix A, the Town cited
controlling traffic movements along the facility in a safe manner as the primary
purpose for the median. A divided typical section would provide two through
lanes in each direction of travel and would include a raised median of varying
width. A combination of the undivided and divided alternatives was selected in
order to control traffic movements without adversely affecting access to several
large businesses along the project.
15
Alternative US 401 / NC 56 Intersection Design
A signalized, conventional four-legged intersection was considered as an
alternative to the proposed intersection configuration. An adequate level of
service could be obtained using this intersection geometry. The Traffic
Engineering Branch of NCDOT was asked to review both configurations and
favored the proposed improvements over the four-legged intersection. The
proposed configuration favors the heavier north/south US 401 traffic volumes,
provides continuity for motorists following the US 401 highway routing,
minimizes signal complexity, and reduces vehicle queues. For these reasons, the
improvements described in Section III.G. of this report are recommended.
C. Postponement of the Proposed Action
Postponement of the proposed project would result in the continuing deterioration
of traffic conditions and safety along this section of US 401. As discussed in Section
II.D. of this report, traffic volumes along this roadway are anticipated to continue to
increase. Thus, postponing the project would only intensify traffic problems in the area.
D. "Do Nothing" Alternative
Although this alternative would avoid the limited adverse environmental impacts
that are anticipated to result from the project, there would be no positive effect on the
traffic capacity and safety of the highway. Therefore, this alternative is not
recommended.
E. Alternative Modes of Transportation
No alternative modes of transportation are considered to be practical. The
proposed project will widen an existing highway to increase its traffic carrying capacity.
US 401 serves regional and local traffic. Trip origins and destinations are widespread
throughout the general project area and region. Alternatives to the automobile would not
provide cost-effective relief for this segment of US 401.
V. SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
A. Social Effects
Land Use
a. Existing Land Use
Most of the project area is urbanized and is dominated by industrial
and commercial land uses. No residential land uses are located in the
project area. Industrial land uses are located on the west side of the project
16
corridor. The east side of the project corridor is primarily wooded with
some commercial land uses. A National Guard Armory is also located on
the west side of the project corridor.
b. Existing Zug
The project area is zoned for a mix of land uses. The area is zoned
for highway commercial and heavy to light industrial land uses.
Institutional uses are also possible.
Proposed Land Use
Local planning officials expect industrial and commercial
development to continue to grow in the project area. The east side of the
project corridor will likely experience higher amounts of growth since
much of the land is still available for development.
d. Project Compatibility with Local Plans
The proposed project is located in the planning and zoning
jurisdiction of the City of Louisburg. The City adopted the Louisburg
Land Use Plan in 1979. The plan was updated in 1989 and is scheduled
to be updated again in the 1996-1997 fiscal year. The proposed project
has been coordinated with the Town of Louisburg and is compatible with
their plans.
2. Relocatees
No relocatees are anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
3. Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice refers to an executive order that requires federal
agencies to administer their programs and activities so that minority and low-
income populations are not disproportionately affected. The project complies
with the Executive Order.
4. Public Facilities
No public parks or recreation areas are located in the immediate project
vicinity. However, the National Guard Armory is located on the west side of the
roadway. The proposed project is anticipated to require the acquisition of
construction easements at the armory, but is not anticipated to adversely impact
the facility. The proposed improvements were described to Major Dan Hassell of
the North Carolina National Guard Engineering Office in Raleigh, North Carolina
17
to solicit his comments. His comments on the proposed project are attached as
page A-24 in Appendix A.
5. Historic and Cultural Resources
a. Architectural/Historical Resources
The proposed project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, as amended.
On December 8, 1995 representatives of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the State Historic Preservation Office
met to discuss the proposed project. After a review of photographs taken
along the project, representatives of NCDOT and SHPO agreed that no
properties listed in or eligible to be listed in the National Register of
Historic Places are located along the proposed project. Furthermore, both
parties agreed that no properties over fifty years of age are located within
the project's area of potential effect. Thus, no historic architectural
resources are located within the project's area of potential effect. A
concurrence form was completed for the proposed project on December
15, 1995 and is included in Appendix A as page A-1.
b. Archaeological Resources
An archaeological survey was conducted to determine whether or
not any archaeological resources that could qualify for nomination to the
National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the proposed
project. The archaeological survey methodology was designed to locate,
identify, and delineate any cultural resources located along the project,
especially those that possess the quality of significance as defined by the
National Register of Historic Places Criteria (36 CFR 60.4 [a-d]). The
scope of archival and archaeological investigations were consistent with
the guidelines issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
(Treatment of Archaeological Properties), the Department of Interior's
Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation
Projects (48 FR44739), and the Federal Highway Administration's
Guidelines on the Consideration of Historic and Archaeological Resources
in the Highway Development Process (HPP-04, January 25, 1989).
No archaeological resources were identified within the project's
area of potential effect. The project area was found to be disturbed by the
placement of roadside drainage ditches, residential and commercial
development, and the previous construction and maintenance of US 401.
Selective shovel tests placed within and immediately adjacent to the area
18
of potential effect failed to uncover any cultural material or features.
Therefore, no further archaeological investigations are necessary or
warranted. A report detailing the survey methodology and findings was
forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office. The State Historic
Preservation Office concurred with the report's findings on August 20,
1996. A copy of the concurrence letter is included as pages A-2 and A-3
of Appendix A.
6. Section 4(f) Properties
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 requires that
impacts to public parks, public recreation areas, historic resources, and wildlife /
waterfowl refuges be avoided or minimized wherever it is feasible and practicable
to do so. No Section 4(f) properties are located along the proposed project.
B. Economic Effects
US 401 is a major thoroughfare and serves as the primary route of travel to and
from the Town of Louisburg. In the vicinity of the proposed project, US 401 serves
several commercial and industrial establishments. The proposed project will increase the
traffic carrying capacity of the roadway and is not anticipated to adversely impact any
businesses along the proposed project. In combination with the remainder of TIP Project
R-2814 and Project R-2425, the proposed project will provide a multilane roadway
between Raleigh and Louisburg. This four-lane facility will make Louisburg more
accessible to motorists and may enhance the business community.
C. Environmental Effects
1. Biotic Resources
Biotic resources include aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. This section
describes the ecosystems encountered in the study area, as well as the
relationships between fauna and flora within these ecosystems. Composition and
distribution of biotic communities throughout the project area are reflective of
topography, hydrologic influences, and past and present land uses. Descriptions
of terrestrial systems are presented in the context of plant community
classifications.
Dominant flora and fauna likely to occur in each community are described
and discussed below. Fauna observed during field investigations are denoted with
an asterisk (*). Scientific nomenclature and common names, when applicable, are
provided for each animal and plant species described.
19
a. Terrestrial Communities
Four terrestrial communities were identified in the project study
area: mesic mixed hardwood forest, pine forest, disturbed community, and
alluvial floodplain. Many faunal species are highly adaptive and may
populate all of the terrestrial communities discussed.
Disturbed Community
This community encompasses two types of habitats that have
recently been or are currently impacted by human disturbance: roadside
shoulder and maintained lawn. Roadside shoulders are land parcels in
which vegetation is irregularly maintained and may receive periodic
herbicide application. Maintained lawns receive general maintenance. A
groomed herbaceous layer is present along with native and exotic shrubs
and trees.
Several plants are located in the herbaceous layer, including fescue
(Festuca sp.), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), dandelion
(Taraxacum officinale), wild onion (Allium canadense), buckhorn plantain
(Plantago lanceolata), mouse-ear chickweed (Cerastium sp.), strawberry
(Fragaria virginiana), blue-eyed grass (Sisyrinchium sp.), dock (Rumex
sp.), and vetch (Vicia sp.). Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) is
located throughout this habitat. Trees observed in the maintained lawn
community include crepe myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica), red maple (Acer
rubrum), dogwood (Cornusllorida), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda).
Raccoon (Procyon lotor) forage nocturnally in these habitat types
and are often observed as roadkill on adjacent roadways. The least shrew
(Cryptotis parva), eastern harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys humulis), and
hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) frequent disturbed or open areas
dominated by herbaceous vegetation which provide foraging and nesting
habitat. Snakes such as the black racer (Coluber constrictor) and eastern
garter (Thamnophis sirtalis) may venture into this community to feed on
small mammals and insects. The mourning dove (Zenaida asiatica) and
cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) inhabit suburban neighborhoods where
they feed on seeds. Mockingbird* (Mimus polyglotios) and American
robin* (Turdus migratorius) are commonly observed along roadsides
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
Mesic mixed hardwood forest habitat in the project study area is
restricted to the east of US 401. Dominant hardwoods in the canopy layer
include white oak (Quercus alba), southern red oak (Q. falcata), tulip
poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), and mockernut hickory (Carya
20
tomentosa). Red maple, loblolly pine, sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica), black cherry (Prunus serotina), red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), American holly (Ilex opaca), and winged elm (Ulmus alata)
are common throughout the subcanopy/sapling layer. Japanese
honeysuckle, muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbrier (Smilax
sp.) are vines common in this habitat. Crane fly orchid (Tipularia
discolor) and strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus) are located in the
herbaceous layer.
Mammalian species commonly occurring in these forested habitats
may include southern short-tailed shrew (Blarina carolinensis), gray
squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), and white-footed mouse (Perom sy cus
leucopus). Shrews and smaller mice prefer forests with a thick layer of
leaf litter. Raccoon* is commonly observed in wooded thickets adjacent
to streams. Rufous-sided towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) are commonly
observed in wooded thickets, where a nest of bark strips, grasses, and dead
leaves is built near or on the ground. The white-throated sparrow*
(Zonotrichia albicollis) was observed in a wooded thicket adjacent to the
unnamed tributary in the project area. The spring peeper (Hyla crucifer)
inhabits woodlands where it may be observed under forest litter or brushy
undergrowth.
Pine Forest
The pine forest has a canopy dominated by loblolly pine with a
sparse understory/shrub layer comprised of black cherry, southern red oak,
blackgum, sweet gum, willow oak (Quercus phellos), red cedar, American
holly, downy arrowwood (Viburnum rafinesquianum), winged sumac
(Rhus copallina), and privet (Ligustrum sinense). Greenbrier, Japanese
honeysuckle, yellow jessamine (Gelsemium sempervirens), and poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans) are common vines. The sparse herb layer is
dominated by panic grass (Panicum sp.), broomsedge (Andropogon
virginicus), pipsissewa (Chimaphila maculata) and crane fly orchid.
The barred owl (Strix varia), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), brown-
headed nuthatch (Sitta pusilla), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus),
pine siskin (Carduelis pinus), and pine warbler (Dendroica pinus) are all
residents of pine forests throughout the south. A Carolina chickadee*
(Parus carolinensis) was observed in this community. The ground skink
(Scincella lateralis) and mole kingsnake (Lampropeltis calligaster) inhabit
open pine forests. An eastern cottontail* (Sylvilagus j<loridanus) was
observed in the pine forest.
21
Alluvial Forest
This habitat, which is intermittently flooded, occurs as a narrow
floodplain east of US 401 and adjacent to the unnamed tributary. The
canopy and subcanopy, which is a mixture of bottomland and mesophytic
species, is dominated by river birch (Betula nigra), tag alder (Alnus
serrulata), Virginia bay (Magnolia virginiana), red maple, sweetgum and
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis). Japanese honeysuckle and greenbrier
are observed in the vine layer. The sparse to dense herbaceous layer is
dominated by Japanese grass (Microstegium vimineum), violet (Viola sp.),
wild onion, and jewelweed (Impatiens capensis).
The deciduous forests that develop on the moist, fertile floodplains
of streams act as natural corridors for vertebrate migration. Typical
residents include golden mouse (Ochrotomys nuttali), white-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus)*, and white-footed mouse (Peromyscus
leucopus). Birds commonly observed in this community include
American robin* (Turdus migratorius), downy woodpecker (Picoides
pubescens)*, and rufous-sided towhee*.
Spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculata), two-lined salamander
(Eurycea bislineata), and marbled salamander (Ambystoma opacum) can
often be observed under logs or stumps in moist habitats adjacent to
streams. Ephemeral pools formed in floodplain depressions are commonly
utilized by northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans) and spring peeper.
b. Aquatic Communities
One aquatic community type, piedmont intermittent stream, is
located in the project study area. Physical characteristics of the water body
and condition of the water influence floral and faunal composition of the
aquatic communities. Terrestrial communities adjacent to a water resource
also greatly affect aquatic communities.
Intermittent streams often experience interruption of flow during
dry spells. Periods of flow interruption are generally seasonal, with the
summer months being drier than the winter. During dry spells, streams
often retain water in shallow pools along their course. It is these pools,
which are influenced in size and depth by climatological events, that
provide habitat for a great diversity of aquatic and semiaquatic species. A
higher species diversity can be found in streams which have a dense
canopy of trees and shrubs.
Amphibians commonly observed in and adjacent to intermittent
streams include northern dusky salamander (Desmo ng athus fuscus) and
22
two-lined salamander. Southern leopard frogs (Rana sphenocephala),
which forage on insects, may be found throughout this community.
Fish diversity in intermittent streams is relatively depauperate. The
slow flow rate and shallow depth of water in intermittent tributaries
typically restricts the migration of fish. However, during severe storm
events and throughout the spring and early summer, several species of fish,
including bluegill Le omis macrochirus) and members of shiner
otro is spp.) genera, may immigrate into the upper reaches of the
intermittent stream located along the project.
C. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Resources
Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on
the biotic resources described. Any construction related activities in or
near these resources have the potential to impact biological functions.
This section quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in
terms of the ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are
considered here as well.
Calculated impacts to terrestrial communities reflect the relative
abundance of each community. Project construction will result in the
clearing and degradation of portions of these communities. Estimated
impacts are derived using the entire proposed right of way width. Table 7
summarizes potential impacts to these biotic communities. In addition to
impacts shown in the table, approximately 2.1 ha (5.2 ac) of disturbed
community will be impacted by the realignment of the intersection of
US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229
TABLE 7. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO BIOTIC COMMUNITIES

Community Quantified Impacts for the
Proposed Improvements
hectares acres
Disturbed Community 1.6(3.9)
Mixed Hardwood Forest 0.3(0.7)
Pine Forest 0.6 1.4
Alluvial Forest 0.2(0.3)
TOTAL 2.7(6.3)
Land in the project study area to the west of US 401 is primarily
disturbed, except for a band of pine forest near the US 401 /NC 56/SR
1229 intersection. Land to the east of US 401 is a mixture of all four
habitat types along with the vast majority of stream resources.
The alluvial floodplain and stream resources are inherently
important to the Tar spinymussel proposed critical habitat. The flora of
23
the floodplain moderates stream temperatures, anchors streambanks, and
reduces sedimentation by trapping soil particles.
The biotic communities found within the project area will be
altered as a result of project construction. Terrestrial communities serve as
nesting, foraging, and shelter habitat for fauna. However, the majority of
the project study area is in a highly altered state, and plants and animals
here are well adapted to disturbed conditions. Flora and fauna occurring in
the disturbed community are common throughout North Carolina because
of their ability to persist in disturbed habitats. Therefore, it is likely that
the plants and animals inhabiting the disturbed community will be
temporarily displaced during project construction.
The proposed construction will result in habitat reduction for
faunal organisms. Individual mortalities are likely to occur to terrestrial
animals (moles, shrews, snakes, etc.) from construction machinery used
during clearing activities. All cleared and grubbed areas along the
roadways will be revegetated soon after project completion to reduce loss
of wildlife habitat.
Construction activities will invariably impact the water resources
located at the project area as well as those downstream. Increased
sedimentation and siltation is often directly attributable to construction
activities. The suspended particles will clog the feeding mechanisms of
benthic organisms, fish, and amphibians. These impacts eventually are
magnified throughout the food chain and ultimately affect faunal
organisms located in higher trophic levels. Strict erosion and
sedimentation controls will be maintained during clearing activities.
Construction activities often affect water level and flow due to
interruption and/or additions to surface and groundwater flow. The change
in water level may severely impact spawning activities of mobile and
sessile organisms. Toxic runoff from construction runoff and highway
spills may result in mortality to aquatic species inhabiting the water
resources located in the project area. Due to the presence of the Tar
spinymussel proposed critical habitat, strict adherence to Best
Management Practices and High Quality Water guidelines will be enforced
during the construction phase of this project.
2. Threatened and Endangered Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of
decline either due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with human
activities. Federal law (under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act
[ESA] of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely affect a
24
species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS). Other species may receive additional protection
under separate state laws.
a. Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered,
Threatened, Proposed Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected
under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA. As of August 23,
1996, the USFWS lists three federally-protected species for Franklin
County (Table 8).
TABLE 8. FEDERALLY-PROTECTED SPECIES FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Dwarf wedge mussel Alasmidonta heterodon E*
Tar s in mussel Elli do steinstansana E*
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii E*
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its
range).
Alasmidonta heterodon (dwarf wedge mussel): Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 14 March 1990
Distribution in N.C.: Franklin, Granville, Halifax, Johnston, Nash,
Vance, Wake, Warren, Wilson.
The dwarf wedge mussel is a small mussel having a distinguishable
shell noted by two lateral teeth on the right half and one on the left half.
The periostracum (outer shell) is olive green to dark brown in color and the
nacre (inner shell) is bluish to silvery white.
Known populations of the dwarf wedge mussel in North Carolina
are found in portions of the Neuse and Tar River systems. This mussel is
sensitive to agricultural, domestic, and industrial pollutants and requires a
stable silt free streambed with well oxygenated water to survive. The
mussel inhabits streams down to 2 m in size. Substrate varies from sand to
pea-sized gravel.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The water resources located in the project study area are intermittent
streams less than 2 m (6.6 feet) wide; thus, suitable habitat for the dwarf
wedge mussel does not exist at these sites. A review of the Natural Heritage
Program rare species and unique habitat database, which was conducted
before the site visit, did not reveal any populations of dwarf wedge mussel
within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area. This species is not
expected to be impacted by project construction.
25
Elli do steinstansana (Tar spinymussel): Endangered
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: 29 July 1985
Distribution in N.C.: Edgecombe, Franklin, Halifax, Nash, Pitt,
Vance, Warren.
The Tar spinymussel is endemic to the Tar River drainage basin,
from Falkland in Pitt County to Spring Hope in Nash County. Populations
of the Tar River spinymussel can be found in streams of the Tar River
Drainage Basin and of the Swift Creek Drainage Sub-Basin.
This mussel requires a stream with fast flowing, well oxygenated,
circumneutral pH water. The stream bottom must be composed of
uncompacted gravel and coarse sand. The water needs to be relatively silt-
free. This species is known to rely on a species of freshwater fish to act as
an intermediate host for its larvae.
The Tar spinymussel is a very small mussel and is named for its
spines which project perpendicularly from the surface and curve slightly
ventrally. As many as 12 spines can be found on the shell which is
generally smooth in texture. The nacre is pinkish (anterior) and bluish-
white (posterior).
Biological Conclusion: Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Suitable habitat for the Tar spinymussel is not present in the project
study area. The unnamed tributaries are intermittent and do not represent
the fast flowing, oxygenated flow necessary for this mussel. However,
stream resources in the project study area are located in the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission proposed critical habitat of the Tar
spinymussel. A review of the National Heritage Program database of rare
species and unique habitats revealed no known populations of Tar
spinymussel within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area.
Because of the presence of the Tar spinymussel proposed critical
habitat, NCDOT's Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters and High Quality Water guidelines (Design Standards in Sensitive
Watersheds) will be strictly enforced during the entire life of the project.
Given that there is a lack of suitable habitat for Tar spinymussel located in
the project study area, the streams impacted by the proposed project are
intermittent, and NCDOT's Best Managemen Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters and High Quality guidelines will be strictly enforced,
project construction is not likely to adversely affect the Tar spinymussel.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service concurred with this
determination in their March 5, 1997 letter that is included as page A-23 in
Appendix A.
Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac): Endangered
Plant Family: Anacardiaceae
Federally Listed: 28 September 1989
Flowers Present: June
Distribution in N.C.: Davie, Durham, Franklin, Hoke, Lincoln,
Moore, Orange, Richmond, Robeson,
Scotland, Wake, Wilson.
26
Michaux's sumac is a densely pubescent rhizomatous shrub. The
bases of the leaflets are rounded and their edges are simply or doubly
serrate. The flowers of Michaux's sumac are greenish to white in color.
Fruits, which develop from August to September on female plants, are a red
densely short-pubescent drupe.
This plant occurs in rocky or sandy open woods. Michaux's sumac is
dependent on some sort of disturbance to maintain the openness of its
habitat. It usually grows in association with basic soils and occurs on sand
or sandy loams. Michaux's sumac grows only in open habitat where it can
get full sunlight. Michaux's sumac does not compete well with other
species, such as Japanese honeysuckle, with which it is often associated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat for Michaux's sumac does exist in the project study area,
notably in ecotonal areas of open disturbed habitat and forest habitats. A
plant-by-plant survey was conducted at the project study area by Chris A.
Murray on 25 March 1996. A known population of Michaux's sumac
outside of the project area was visited prior to the site visits. No
populations of Michaux's sumac were identified in the project study area.
A review of the NHP rare species and unique habitat database, which was
conducted before the site visit, did not reveal any populations of Michaux's
sumac within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area. Impacts to this
species are not expected from project construction.
b. Federal Species of Concern and State Protected Species
Federal Species of Concern (FSC) are those plant and animal
species which may or may not be listed in the future. Four FSC are listed
in Franklin County (Table 9). FSC species are not afforded federal
protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of
its provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or
listed as Threatened or Endangered. Organisms which are listed as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the NHP list
of Rare Plant and Animal species are afforded state protection under the
State ESA and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act
of 1979; however, the level of protection given to state listed species does
not apply to NCDOT activities.
TABLE 9. FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY
Common Name Scientific Name NC Status Habitat
Yellow lance Elli do lanceolata T No
Atlantic i toe Fusconaia masoni T No
Yellow lam mussel Lam silis cariosa T No
Wa leaf wild quinine Parthenium rad ordii W2 No
Threatened (T) species are a native species of wild animal which is
likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
27
throughout all or a significant portion of its range, or one that is designated
as a threatened species pursuant to the ESA. Species listed as Watch
Category 2 (W2) includes species with questionable taxonomy, including
taxa of dubious validity and taxa under study and potentially to be named.
A review of the NHP database of rare species and unique habitats did not
reveal the presence of these species or unique habitats in or near the
project study area. Surveys for these species were not conducted during
the site visit, nor were these species observed during the site visit.
Populations of yellow lance and Atlantic pigtoe were identified where US
401 crosses the Tar River, approximately 1.1 km (0.7 mi) northeast of the
project study area.
3. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning water resources likely to be
impacted by the project. Water resource information encompasses the resources'
relationship to major water systems, its physical aspects, Best Usage
Classification, and water quality of the resources. Probable impacts to these water
bodies are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
Characteristics of Water Resources
Water resources located within the project study area lie in the Tar-
Pamlico River Drainage Basin. Six unnamed intermittent tributaries (UTs
1-6) to the Tar River are located in the project study area. There are no
streams located in the US 401, NC 56, and SR 1229 intersection
realignment portion of the project study area.
UT 4 originates at a man-made lake located approximately 183 m
(600 ft) south of the project study area. This tributary continues to the
northeast approximately 2.1 km (1.3 mi) where it reaches its confluence
with the Tar River. The remainder of the UTs originate at or near US 401
and flow to the south where they reach their confluence with UT 4. The
approximate locations of UTs located in the project study area are depicted
in Figure 9. Additional information concerning stream resources is
located in Table 10.
TABLE 10. STREAM RESOURCE INFORMATION
UT # Width m/ft Depth m/ft Substrate* Seasonality
1 2.0(6.0) 0.2(0.5) CI,Sa Si Intermittent
2 0.3(l.0) <0.1 0.2 Gr,Sa Si Intermittent
3 0.6 2.0 0.1 0.3 Co,Gr,Sa Intermittent
4 1.0(3.5) 0.2(0.5) CI,Sa Si Intermittent
5 0.6(2.0) <0.1 2) 1 Co,Gr,Sa Intermittent
6 0.5 1.5 <0.1 (0.2) 1 Gr.Sa,Si Intermittent
Substrate Classifications: Si=Silt, CI=Clay, Sa=Sand, Gr-Gravel, Co=Cobble.
28
b. Best Usage Classification
Streams have been assigned a best usage classification by the
Division of Environmental Management (DEM). The best usage
classification of unnamed tributaries is the same as the water body to
which they are a tributary. According to the DEM, the best usage
classification of the portion of the Tar River into which the unnamed
tributaries drain (DEM Index No. 28-(24.7)) is WS-V NSW. Class WS-V
waters are protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and
draining to Class WS-IV waters. No categorical restrictions on watershed
development or treated wastewater discharges are required; however, the
Commission or its designee may apply appropriate management
requirements as deemed necessary for the protection of downstream
receiving waters. These waters are suitable for all Class C uses. Class C
waters are suitable for aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing,
wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. NSW (Nutrient Sensitive
Waters) is a supplemental classification indicating waters which require
limitations on nutrient inputs. No water resources classified as High
Quality Waters (HQW's), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II), or
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW's) are located within 1.6 km (1.0 mi)
of the project study area.
C. Water Quality
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is
managed by the Division of Environmental Management and is part of an
ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long
term trends in water quality. The program assesses water quality by
sampling for selected benthic macroinvertebrate organisms at fixed
monitoring sites. Macroinvertebrates are sensitive to very subtle changes
in water quality; thus, the species richness and overall biomass of these
organisms are reflections of water quality. There are no monitoring sites
located in the vicinity of the project study area.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are
permitted through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) program. Any discharger is required to register for a permit.
There are no permitted dischargers that will impact water bodies located in
the project area.
Non-point source runoff from impervious surfaces may be a source
of water quality degradation in the tributaries located in the project
vicinity.
29
d. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
Potential impacts to water resources in the project study area are
dependent upon final construction limits. Roadway construction in and
adjacent to tributaries located in the project study area will result in water
quality impacts. Clearing and grubbing activities will directly result in soil
erosion leading to increased sedimentation and turbidity. These effects
may extend downstream for considerable distance with decreasing
intensity.
UT 4 is located within a forested alluvial floodplain on the east
side of US 401 (see Figure 9). Removal of streamside vegetation will
have a negative effect on water quality. The vegetation typically shades
the water's surface from sunlight, thus moderating water temperature. The
removal of streamside canopy during construction will result in more
extreme fluctuating water temperatures. During warmer portions of the
year, the water temperature will increase, resulting in a decreases in
dissolved oxygen because warmer water holds less oxygen. Streambank
vegetation stabilizes streambanks and reduces sedimentation by trapping
soil particles.
Locally, the construction of this project will increase the amount of
impervious area in the project study area and, ultimately, vehicular use of
the roadway. This will directly lead to an increase in concentrations of
toxic compounds (gas, oil, and highway spills) which may be carried into
nearby water resources via precipitation, sheet flow, and subsurface
drainage. Increased amounts of toxic materials can adversely alter the
water quality of any water resource, thus impacting its biological and
chemical functions.
The installation and/or extension of culverts and pipes and other
in-stream disturbance during project construction will result in
resuspension of existing sediments and subsequent turbidity. The
placement of culverts and pipes in streams typically results in alterations
of the water level. Stream flow is typically reduced downstream of the
project while temporary diversions of water flow will raise the water level
upstream from the project. Additionally, pipes and culverts accelerate
water flow during storm events, leading to streambank and substrate
disturbance.
Impacts to surface waters typically extend beyond the project study
area. Indirect impacts to surfaces waters exist both upstream and
downstream of the project study area. Indirect impacts may include
changes in flooding regime, discharge, erosion, and sedimentation
patterns.
30
Stream resources in the project study area are located in the North
Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (WRC) proposed critical habitat
(PCH) of the Tar spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana). Because of the
presence of this habitat and in order to minimize impacts to water
resources, NCDOT's Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the
Protection of Surface Waters and High Quality Water (HQW) guidelines
(Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds) will be strictly enforced
during the entire life of the project. Approximately 100 m (328 feet) of
stream channel relocation along UT 4 is anticipated during project
construction. Since stream relocation is necessary, NCDOT will
coordinate with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission with
reference to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (stream relocation
guidelines).
The NCDOT, in cooperation with the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality, has developed a sedimentation control program for
highway projects which adopts formal Best Management Practices (BMPs)
for the protection of surface waters. The following actions are methods to
reduce sedimentation and water quality impacts:
-reduction and elimination of direct and non-point discharge into
the water bodies and minimization of activities conducted in
streams.
-installation of temporary silt fences, dikes, and earth berms to
control runoff during construction.
-placement of temporary ground cover or re-seeding of disturbed
sites to reduce runoff and decrease sediment loadings.
-reduction of clearing and grubbing along streams.
-elimination of construction staging areas in floodplains
or adjacent to streams which would reduce the potential
of accidental discharge of toxins into water bodies.
4. Jurisdictional Wetlands
Criteria to determine the presence of jurisdictional wetlands include
evidence of hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydrology. A portion of the
alluvial floodplain in the widening portion of the project study area is considered a
jurisdictional wetland (see Figure 9). This wetland is located to the east of
US 401 approximately 134 m (440 feet) south of Edward Lane. The forested
wetland is dominated by mesophytic and bottomland species including river birch,
red maple, tag alder, sycamore, and Virginia bay. The sandy clay loam soil
31
present in this wetland exhibited a matrix color of 10YR5/1 with a mottle color of
10YR6/6 at a depth of 30 cm (12 in). Evidence of wetland hydrology include
saturation within 30 cm (12 in), drainage pattern within the wetland, and drift
lines. Approximately 0.1 ha (0.3 ac) of this wetland will be impacted by the
proposed project. The wetland is associated with an unnamed tributary (see UT 4
on Figure 9) that lies within the existing highway right of way. Approximately
100 in (328 feet) of this stream will be relocated as discussed in Section V.C.8.
Widening to the west side of US 401 at this location was briefly considered to
minimize impacts to the wetland. Widening to the west side would adversely
affect several industries located along the west side of US 401; as a result, west
side widening was eliminated from consideration.
5. Permits
Impacts to surface waters and wetlands are anticipated from project
construction. In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act, a permit will be required from the United States Army Corps of Engineers for
discharge of dredge or fill material into "Waters of the United States."
A Section 404 Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(a) (23) will likely be
applicable for all impacts to Waters of the United States found in the project study
area. This permit authorizes activities undertaken, assisted, authorized, regulated,
funded or financed in whole, or part, by another Federal agency or department
where:
(1) that agency or department has determined that pursuant to
the council on environmental quality regulation for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy
Act;
(2) that the activity, work, or discharge is categorically
excluded from environmental documentation because it is included
within a category of actions which neither individually nor
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment,
and;
(3) that the office of the Chief of Engineers has been furnished
notice of the agency' or department's application for the
categorical exclusion and concurs with that determination.
This project will require a 401 Water Quality Certification from the DWQ
prior to the issuance of the Nationwide Permit. Section 401 of the CWA requires
that the state issue or deny water certification for any federally permitted or
license activity that may result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. The
i
32
issuance of a 401 permit from the DEM is a prerequisite to issuance of a Section
404 permit.
6. Soils
A published soil survey for Franklin County has not been completed;
however, preliminary soil mapping for the project study area was obtained from
the Natural Resource Conservation Service. Table 11 provides an inventory of
specific soil types which occur in the project study area. Site index information,
which is useful in assessing woodland productivity, is not currently available for
Franklin County.
TABLE 11. SOILS LOCATED IN THE PROJECT STUDY AREA

M8 Unit Map Unit
S mboI Percent
Slope Hydric Class.
Wedowee-urban land-Udorthents complex 134C 2-10 a*
Wedowee sand loam 135C 2-6 a'
Wake-Saw-Wedowee complex 62B 2-8 a*
Helena sand loam 51B 2-6 a*
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, frequently flooded 86A 0-3 b*
Notes: "a" denotes a map unit that is a non-hydric soil.
"b" denotes a map unit that is a hydric soil.
7. Flood Hazard Evaluation
Franklin County is not currently a participant in the National Flood
Insurance Regular Program; however, the Town of Louisburg is a participant in
the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. Neither the minor stream crossing
(located approximately 150 m south of NC 39) nor the intermittent tributary to the
Tar River that parallels US 401 on he east side (UT 4) is in a designated flood
hazard zone or a detailed flood study. The approximate limits of the 100-year
floodplain in the vicinity of the project are shown in Figure 10. The proposed
project is above headwaters and is not anticipated to require an individual
environmental permit. Since the proposed project is not in a water supply
watershed or a high quality water zone, erosion and sedimentation would normally
be controlled through the implementation of standard erosion and sedimentation
control measures. However, because of the presence of proposed critical habitat
for the Tar spinymussel in the project area, NCDOT's Best Management Practices
(BMPs) for the Protection of Surface Waters and High Quality Water (HQW)
guidelines will be used. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained to the
extent practicable, and groundwater resources are not anticipated to be affected by
the project.
33
8. Stream Modification
Approximately 100 m (328 feet) of an unnamed, intermittent tributary to
the Tar River (designated as U.T. 4 on Figure 9) will need to be relocated as a part
of the proposed project. The unnamed tributary is located south of Edward Lane
approximately 15 m (50 feet) east of the existing US 401 centerline. The section
of the stream to be relocated is above headwaters.
9. Farmland
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires all federal agencies
or their representatives to consider the impact of land acquisition and construction
projects on prime and important farmland soils. Land which has been previously
developed or planned for development by the local governing body is exempt
from the requirements of the Act. The entire project area is developed or
designated for urban development; therefore, no further consideration of potential
farmland impacts is required.
10. Traffic Noise
A "worst-case" noise analysis determined that only four commercial
receptors are expected to be impacted by highway traffic noise. The transmission
loss characteristics of these structures, however, are believed to be sufficient to
moderate effects of intrusive traffic noise. The maximum extent of the 72 and
67 dBA noise level contours are 23.2 m (76 feet) and 42.5 m (139 feet),
respectively, from the center of the proposed roadway. This information should
assist local authorities in excercising land use control over the remaining
undeveloped lands adjacent to the roadway within their local jurisdiction.
Noise levels could increase during construction, but this increase would be
temporary. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway
traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and no additional reports are required.
11. Air Quality Analysis
The proposed project is located in Franklin County, which has been
determined to be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
40 CFR, Part 51 is not applicable, because the proposed project is located in an
attainment area. The proposed project is not anticipated to create any adverse
effect on the air quality of this attainment area. The air quality programs
MOBILESA and CAL3QHC revealed that the one-hour carbon monoxide
concentrations for the years 2000 and 2020 (2.9 ppm and 3.0 ppm, respectively)
are well below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
34
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in
accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina State
Implementation Plan for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. This
evaluation completes the assessment requirements for air quality (1990 CAAA
and NEPA) and no additional reports are required.
12. Hazardous Materials and Storage Tanks
A reconnaissance survey was conducted to locate and identify
underground storage tanks and hazardous materials sites within the project
corridor.
Six underground storage tanks are registered with the Division of
Environmental Management at the Food-A-Rama Convenience Store located in
the northeast quadrant of the intersection of US 401 and SR 1700 (Fox Park
Road). According to the Division of Environmental Management's database,
three of the gasoline tanks were permanently closed in January, 1988. The
remaining three tanks, each storing 30,240 liters of gasoline, are located on the
south side of the convenience store building approximately 39.6 m (130 feet) from
the centerline of existing US 401.
Five above ground storage tanks (ASTs) are located south of the
Louisburg Exxon which is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of
US 401 and NC 39. The above ground storage tanks are used as primary storage
by the Warren Oil Company. The above ground storage tanks are located
approximately 15.8 m (52 feet) from the centerline of existing US 401.
During the design phase of the proposed project, efforts will be made to
avoid the above ground and underground storage tanks. No other environmental
hazards were identified in the project area.
13. Construction Impacts
In order to minimize potential adverse effects caused by construction, the
following measures, along with those already mentioned, will be enforced during
the construction of the proposed project:
a. All possible measures will be taken to ensure that the public's
health and safety will not be compromised during the movement of any
materials to and from construction sites along the project and that any
inconveniences imposed on the public will be kept to a minimum.
b. Dust control will be exercised at all times to prevent endangering
the safety and general welfare of the public and to prevent diminishing the
value, utility, or appearance of any public or private property.
C. The contractor shall be required to observe and comply with all
laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, and decrees, including those of the
35
North Carolina State Board of Health, regarding the disposal of solid
waste. All solid waste will be disposed of in accordance with the Standard
Specifications of the Division of Highways. These specifications have
been reviewed and approved by the Solid Waste Vector Control Section of
the Division of Health Services, North Carolina Department of Human
Resources.
d. Waste and debris will be disposed of in areas outside of the right of
way and provided by the contractor, unless otherwise required by the plans
or special provisions or unless disposal within the right of way is permitted
by the Engineer. Disposal of waste and debris in active public waste or
disposal areas will not be permitted without prior approval by the
Engineer.
e. The construction of the project is not expected to cause any serious
disruptions in service to any of the utilities serving the area. Before
construction is started, a preconstruction conference involving the
contractor, pertinent local officials, and the Division of Highways will be
held to discuss various construction procedures, including a discussion of
precautionary steps to be taken during the time of construction that will
minimize interruption of utility services.
f. Prior to construction, a determination will be made regarding the
need to relocate or adjust any existing utilities in the project area. A
determination as to whether the North Carolina Department of
Transportation or the utility owner will be responsible for this work will be
made at that time.
g. During construction of the proposed project, all materials resulting
from clearing and grubbing, demolition, or other operations will be
removed from the project, burned, or otherwise disposed of by the
contractor. Any burning will be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and ordinances and regulations of the North Carolina State
Implementation Plan for Air Quality. Care will be taken to ensure burning
will be done at the greatest distance practicable from dwellings and not
when atmospheric conditions are such as to create a hazard to the public.
Burning will be performed under constant surveillance.
h. An erosion control schedule will be devised by the contractor
before work is started. The schedule will show the time relationship
between phases of the work which must be coordinated to reduce erosion
and shall describe construction practices and temporary erosion control
measures which will be used to minimize erosion. In conjunction with the
erosion control schedule, the contractor will be required to follow those
provisions of the plans and specifications which pertain to erosion and
siltation. These contract provisions are in accordance with the strict
erosion control measures as outlined in the Department of Transportation's
FHPM 6-7-3-1. Temporary erosion control measures such as the use of
berms, dikes, dams, silt basins, etc. will be used as needed.
i. Prior to the approval of any borrow source developed for use on
this project, the contractor shall obtain a certification from the North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources certifying that the removal of
material from the borrow source will have no effect on any known district,
36
site, building, structure, or object that is included or eligible for inclusion
in the National Register of Historic Places. A copy of this certification
shall be furnished to the Engineer prior to performing any work on the
proposed borrow site.
j. Traffic service in the immediate project area may be subjected to
brief disruption during construction of the project. Every effort will be
made to ensure that the transportation needs of the public will be met both
during and after construction.
VI. COMMENTS AND COORDINATION
A. Comments Received from Federal, State, and Local Agencies
The proposed project has been coordinated with appropriate federal, state, and
local municipalities and agencies. Comments were requested from the municipalities and
agencies listed below. Asterisks denote that written responses were received and are in
Appendix A.
Town of Louisburg*
Franklin County Commissioners
Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments
N.C. National Guard Engineering Office*
N.C. Department of Cultural Resources *
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs *
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Division of Environmental Management
Division of Land Resources *
N.C. Department of Administration -- State Clearinghouse
N.C. Department of Public Instruction
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -- Raleigh
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -- Wilmington
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -- Atlanta
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service -- Raleigh
U.S. Geological Survey -- Raleigh
B. Citizens Informational Workshop
A Citizens Informational Workshop was held on July 11, 1996 in the Employee
Training Center at the Louisburg Police Department at 104 Wade Avenue in Louisburg.
The purpose of the workshop was to present the proposed improvements to the
community and solicit comments and input from local citizens. Approximately 20
citizens attended the workshop, which was advertised in the Raleigh News and Observer.
The news release for the workshop is included in Appendix B as page B-1. Each attendee
was given the opportunity to review aerial photographs showing the proposed
improvements to US 401 and ask questions and make comments. In addition, handouts
37
were available to all meeting attendees. These handouts, which are included on pages
B-2 through B-8 in Appendix B, included a description of the project, a cost estimate for
the project, current project schedules, and a comment sheet which could be completed
and returned to the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
Comments received on the proposed improvements were generally favorable.
Most citizens recognized the need for the widening project. However, several business
owners along the proposed project were concerned about potential impacts to their
properties. Businesses such as Boston Gear, Toney Lumber Company, and Toney Ace
Hardware favor the widening of this section of US 401. Toney Lumber Company and
Toney Ace Hardware both voiced their support for a five-lane undivided facility rather
than a four-lane roadway with a raised median. Warren Oil Company expressed concern
that any widening of the roadway might impact one or more of their above-ground storage
tanks. The oil distributor was also concerned that trucks would not be able to enter and
exit his property. The owners of Moss Foods expressed concern about access to their
property after the construction of the project. Their business is located adjacent to the
intersection of US 401, SR 1229, and NC 56, which will be realigned. Access will be
maintained to their business. Moss Foods also expressed interest in buying any excess
right of way from NCDOT to expand their parking facilities. Representatives of the
Town of Louisburg expressed support for widening the subject section of US 401 to a
four-lane roadway with a raised median, where feasible. An additional comment was
received from the owner of a potentially historic property located south of the proposed
project. TIP Project R-2814 will widen the roadway in the vicinity of her property;
therefore, her comments will be considered during the planning of that project.
C. Public Hearing
A public hearing will be held following the completion of this report to provide
more information on the proposed project to local citizens.
VII. CONCLUSION
The proposed widening of US 401 to a multilane facility and the reconfiguration
of the intersection of US 401, SR 1229 (Main Street), and NC 56 will increase the traffic
carrying capacity and improve safety along the facility. The proposed widening project is
anticipated to require minor amounts of additional right of way and easements in some
locations; however, no residences or businesses are anticipated to be relocated. Although
some additional right of way will be required, the proposed project is not anticipated to
result in any significant impacts to the human or natural environment and is considered to
be a "categorical exclusion", as defined by the Federal Highway Administration's
environmental guidelines (23 CFR 771.117).
EBM/-
38

_ _ _ ? 39om lert
r Centervill 'Wood
y Ingl Wde 3 /
1 5 I 1 /r
I F R N, \I(?L I N
+Louisbur
56
/
nklmton,/ 56 B I
` r % 5 a} 9 Me0leville Justice r
Younasville 10 3910
? t
? IA s ?1 -
New ove Bun S0T FRANKLIN
"--J COUNTY
_ U!Y 5 6 98
?? Pa rtes
/ Pilot 1
1
,
i 1211
1230 / Ir
r 1 \ . , ? 1
' Y 0 1 00
56
39 i
? c'S I
1 1 1 122e - I
1264 1 1 '37 it 1229 / r
0 N
I 4? 1226 i _ ?° ? 10 ? ?
06 i 1230 i
r / 6
' • ? ; ?.? ? /• ? END
56 ? , t
PROJECT
1 / 401 1
I 56 1 tp
1 I (V
I ---- % 1
?' 1 I 1 I
BEGIN - - - ' -
62
PROJECT ?3 ?,
R-2814 E
1700
cn 160
39
tp ?9
401
1775 of
• \ 4?
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ,
\ 1772 TRANSPORTATION
1700 A DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
\ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
US 401
SR 1700 TO NC 39 IN LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
T.I.P. PROJECT NO. R-2814 E
f
- - - FIG. 1

e
o0l Li "
F -„ - •

a ?
? e
? 4a
? ?'
ao3
Aax
o
o
oGG
? a 0 ?
U
v W
J r Q W 2
aa?c
aF,?r
O 2?
?oc?
v ? U
a

nom. ? w0 w

o• N
_ ry o
a '

x

?: rP
-ALA-

I
I Q? ka
r?
v GG
O 5 8 0
u 2y d • ? O_ ?. v
1J
cf) v
y by •" cd
?b ?5 off) 3?no
•? H Q o4 0 U cn
?... a a?i >, S
Q , c O 10 0
A l?
. 1 C1 ON `" O O Cn b
o? ? ° ?b? aw b.a
d ?? v C C ti
LI)
t0 ? b ? ,?l1 ? •? L3, ? c?
N O o U W H F. c`d
oG 3 -- ? p•' Z
`I
r
1 r' I ?
r 1 ? '
r
l

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 1999
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER DAY)
N
00
O
2
s?o0
O
9ho
ti?1° O ? ??1?? /s0
?, s o
0
0
^bb
4
I
?r.9 b0
9r?
s?
J
AQ
00
A
G?'1o ?qo 90? ?
?1 ? tP
?O
f
s?
{2
`''o
/A .
Ao
Dpi
Qo
a°
a° `" n?°)
s?so o
\O /o Oti,
/O
NOq?
so
ss
ono so
9
?o
?o
TRUCK PERCENTAGES ON
THIS SECTION OF US 401
TYPE PERCENTAGE
DUALS 1.1
TtST 3.3
0
4A
404
o`
^O
Noho -41
50
?O
? ,60 ^b0
O
? O
\ 11O
P??OF pOR7f{ C'90
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
g = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
d ,?gP? g PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
OF 7Rp/
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 1999
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 F.
NO SCALE
FIGURE 3A
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 2019
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER DAY)
N
50
''s?, 'L5 bo
0? ? ati a?,So
?o
alb bo ? /asp °
TO
s \ o
S?
1
??9 a0
91?
s?
J
5
6)
p0
6)
?O
1
120
113/
90

by-0
Ob\O
\Ob\O O ? ???'6. App Gn?o)
*10
/O
\1p??
`00
O/
\O
60
s°
6p
9
TRUCK PERCENTAGES ON
THIS SECTION OF US 401
TYPE PERCENTAGE
DUALS 1.1
TTST 3.3
O?
O?
4P
O?
4
^?O
541
/ '/ °
\10
.TJ6p O ? ? \\b?0 \ - 60/O
O/
O
?, O
O
sa
OF NORTH e,9o
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
= DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
OF TRA'QO?
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 2019
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 F.
NO SCALE FIGURE 313
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 2019
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER DAY)
N
O
2J- X55 b°
O 'l
?o
atibo o l?s
b o
,.r ?,
, o
??o ° ??
s?
X19 a°
r? ??b
9f?
s?
J
5
6)
p0
6)
Gh? 5?5° p° ?r
.fJ, O ??
\ -19
TO 0
/O
AJ.
SO.
O
/O

NZ10
aa1o
b°
s?
r?
?o
21110
60
s
q°O 06°
?O
.9
q?
?O
o°i
O?
Q¢
004
4
o?
^O
?b?° ?4ti
TRUCK PERCENTAGES ON
THIS SECTION OF US 401
TYPE PERCENTAGE.
DUALS 1.1
TTST 3.3
b?
1?0? NOR7H C,g90
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
O = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
^b PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
9???OF TR??'QO?
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES : 2019
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
NO SCALE
FIGURE 3B
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 2019
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER DAY)
N
0
?s '15? o
? 'ro 'Lb
?p? Aso ?? ?? b b?,?o
0
b?bp p ? ? ??s so
b o
60
s .? o
?`
.' o ,?
S?
j?9 bo
9r?
s?
J
5
6)
90
6)
G?'b 5^?p Ao ?
IrO
& ?p
O 11
60 \4%,\ v boo 60'O
?O
5/J
\ s6
O
O
/O
\ 0 ?0 1^
6O \ pb1
60 44,\
bo ? `
l?
2/9,
O
0
s
qp0 060
10
9
0
?O

TRUCK PERCENTAGES ON
THIS SECTION OF US 401
TYPE PERCENTAGE
DUALS 1.1
TTST 3.3
O?
O?
44'
40+
100
1
5¢
?b?p
?j
OF NORTH CggO
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
4 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
P
F?OF 7AAQO?
bb
1
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES : 2019
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
NO SCALE
FIGURE 313
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 1999
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER HOUR)
N
1?
l 1'
S9, ?
9 `
1
r?b
s?
I
s?
J
vs
X66
s?
r?
/O

IP6
!? ? Abp
44,
b

9 llp
iG
OP
QP
O+
4
^4O
1
1? X4

J
lj
8
NOR 7I{ 0,90
y Gy NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
q = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
g PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
'?F?OF 7pANgQO?
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 1999
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
NO SCALE FIGURE 4A
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FOR THE YEAR 2019
(REPORTED IN VEHICLES PER HOUR)
N
s
?a
1y
19
s?
J
a,?o
1p
s#
?O
f
rj
I'll

!, 5A
00
/ebb
/ bA
O ?
b?
9
bb
-,?G
O1?
4
)
0
?4
4P
40+
Ol
^O
?5?' S¢1
a/O
8J ? ?? ,fig \ 66!
F2
9
?o
!
ti?O? NOnrh c,9o
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
g = DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
b PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
' FTgpN°jQ
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES: 2019
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 F,
NO SCALE
FIGURE 413
THE EXISTING INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION
OF THE INTERSECTION OF US 401, NC 56, AND
SR 1229 (MAIN STREET) m SR 1229
U s 401
NC 56
O
V1

NOTES: 1. Arrows indicate directions of
travel.
2. A single line across a lane represents
a yield sign.
3. A double line across a lane represents
a stop sign.

? NORTH C
ti? 490
O
h NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
q
d DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
P

7pP'Q
OF
EXISTING INTERSECTION CONFIGURATION
(US 401, NC 56, SR 1229)
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 F
NO SCALE
FIGURE 5
x
u
?D
o z
L m O o
3 w
ao
5
W ? ?
aHx ?
c?zo 0°
c `` `?
0.O i
C 'J
0 W z ^ a
u
Q r? 'L
. O
G V OpwD O?c-:.
G
a z
U
o
?
t ego
LLB w w ?
.
. o-

o`?NA_: N?blb Q ?
p
Ej bN w 4
4 O N W
i o O a
o
d
1 Q.
`1sz.?EPP. O

i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
N
N
N
iD
Ln
U
Z
v
d
N
0
C
rn
N

u
w z

1-
w =' q
m
? ?
1?"pz?? ? pr, O
vwi ? u??, W
W
paw a p u¦ ¦ p
z
a?z x ' >

z
I
? 0

xl I
w w
C O
'ma
'
? ?`

?
Z
y
? a a
? O
na, oo ?' oi<"

0
`00
ao
W W
n ul
u?

IK';
ya
u
WK
?N
I?1I
.1

?
8-

G
? o
?
t
U

oJNI' No??, rA ? S
o 00
10
i
` I
1 ?tM\ ?lI
1 i l S1.
Ol/OlN tP?
a? N
1
? N
r lam/ ? ? ? ? ?
r z - "• l A
i
4w I trwr?l` i /
y
r ? ? 1 IaSN 5 .
¦ .• 0 I
\ 1
Il 1 ? _
o¦
¦
¦ 1 ?y
¦ O ?
¦ 00
¦ / 1 '• W
¦
Como 41
Ll IMIT/ 1
.TJ
' y
NC ?'
s
?A 000 OOL I
00 f
•? ? 00000 - -] __ ? ? ? L- - - S ?? f
\` W I ,-
a
s a
a
H
C7
w
on

PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS
IY??
-L-. US 401
TA
14 M I q_') M 14 m 74m
0.6m
VAR 1 m to 9Am Obm

NC
f
3m 03m
NC
ONC PLANTER
?

FOUR-LANE, DIVIDED TYPICAL SECTION
WITH A RAISED MEDIAN OF VARIABLE WIDTH
V,
2.3 m 2.4 m
(8 fee:) ( 9.6 m 9.6 m 1 (8 !eet)
(32 feet) I (32 feet)
0.15 m 0.15 m
(0.5 feet) (0.5 feet)
9 m t i 9 m
(30 feet) I (30 feet)
VAR L__j
FIVE-LANE, UNDIVIDED, CURB AND GUTTER
TYPICAL SECTION
?F'Of NORTH O
A
y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
•? TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
OF TAI•N?
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS
US 101
FRO' v( SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROAD
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COI.'NTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
v?
our ur
V r 1
1
END PROJECT • . • _ ?• •
t • • `w• • O
•
?. • \ L'T6
1
l
UT 5
5 0ry
/UT 3
UT 1 UT 2 X tij?Wetland 1
a Stream Relocation
/?• \
(see Section V.C.8.)
401 • UT4 v •
• ,J
39
BEGIN PROJECT
NOTE: UT is an abbreviation for an
unnamed tributary to the Tar River.
A?OF NORTH O,qO
a NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
o 4' PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
o?
OF: Tgr.NSc
LOCATION OF WETLANDS AND
STREAM RESOURCES
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 19 (BUNN ROAD)
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
SCALE I inch= 1000 feet FIGURE 9
7rkj\?'1•} `., -? / '//' -? ? ,li I I "'_ - ?BMC 2861 ? ` ??
0 200
`- _ Fairgrounds f % ?, d y• ?~. T ??, \ J
I?' 1111, . ;?, ? ??;?, - ;?, I ?[ ,, ?I-J.? :•1' ?• , \ BM '?_ - ' / ii
/; -
X11 `? •• . „• )
-00
41
andmg' \\?_'?\\ - r \ III. ?•\ ° ? .4 \ I ewa I
6 BEGM PROJECT "'
+•
-
Drive -in , • ry 11
1 r Arm • END PROJECT ?-
0P + u Ire . /B
ater 1\1 / I, u•??
' nk
APPROXIMATE 100-YEAR
FLOODPLAM LIMITS
17C W
fer
M
a 160'
09
0 0F NORTH
` o, I y NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
° 75p TRANSPORTATION
•` - i - '- i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
_ PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL BRANCH
OF, To
315 APPROXIMATE FLOODPLAIN LIMITS
- u US 401
- s FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39 (BUNN ROADr
® 100-year Floodplain LOUISBURG
- la?,? _ lay)
77-
FNKLIN CO
- ? \ I -- I TIP PROJECT R- NT E
SCALE I inch = 2000 feet FIGURE 10
APPENDIX A
COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM FEDERAL, STATE,
AND LOCAL AGENCIES

TIP n R- 261q F_ Federal Aid n 8.)Hb3001 County Franklir\
CONCURRENCE FORM
FOR
PROPERTIES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
Brief Project Description
W -1o-ne-
ed! USHo1 from a. -iavte_ rC>aLLLua-L a 0--
at curb 3
34-o _r b e_1-.11 er, 52 i--06 a.rLd- QC_ 3 9
%
On a 'D ee_ 199S- , representatives of the ,
? North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA)
? North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Other
reviewed the subject project at
A.scoping meeting
Historic architectural resources photograph review session/consultation
Other
All parties present agreed
there are no properties over fifty years old within the project's area of potential effect.
there at,! no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criterion
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effect.
there are properties over fifty years old (list attached) within the project's area of potential effect,
but based on the historical information availabie and the photographs of each property, properties
identified as are
considered not eligible for the National e?ister and no further evaiuation of them is necessary.
there are no National Register-listed properties within the project's area of potential effect.
Signed:'
1`-l ?_ S Dec- 1995
Represen ti e, : CDOT Date
FHWA, Cdr the Division Administrator, or other Federal Agency

Date
m/8/9S
Retprntative, HPO Date
State Historic Preservation Officer ate
If a survey report is prepared, a final copy of this form and the attached list will be included.
A-1
4
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
August 20, 1996
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: US 401 from SR 1700 to NC 39, Franklin
County, Federal Aid Project STP-401(4), State
Project 8.1403001, TIP R-2814E, 96-E-4220-
0446, ER 97-7263
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
C4 h 1 4?
AUG 2 2 1996
DIVIS!C%,
HIr..: of
Z"
Thank you for your letter of August 12, 1996, transmitting the archaeological
survey report by John Mintz concerning the above project.
For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act, we concur that no properties were found which might be considered eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The report in general meets
our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. Specific concerns
and/or corrections which need to be addressed in the preparation of a final report
are attached for the author's use.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely, t
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: / F. Vick
T. Padgett
J. Mintz
A-2
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 1 ?Ga
US 401 from SR 1700 to NC 39,
Franklin County, Federal Aid Project STP-401(4),
State Project 8.1403001, TIP R-2814E
Generally a good report--reads well and indicates sound research methods.
Two changes necessary:
Page 11: "No cultural material was observed in the excavated soil matrix" is
repeated.
A map showing the location of shovel tests is needed.
A-3
1"Aft oa 2"i""
Office of the - Mayor
July 19, 1996
Mr. David Allsbrook
Division Engineer
N. C. Dept. of Transportation
P. O. Box 11580
Durham, N. C. 27704
Dear Mr. Allsbrook:
Ill.
is III
s Oi ft&%A e
Thank you for involving the Town of Louisburg and affected citizens
in the early planning stages for the multi-laning of Bickett
Boulevard from N.C. Highway 39 to S.R. 1700 (Fox Park Road), State
Project No. 8.1403001.
We are pleased to have the widening of N.C. Highway 401 begin in
Louisburg, and look forward to completion of the entire project
linking our community to Raleigh and the Triangle.
As you continue planning, please consider including in the current
Bickett Boulevard project:
1. Grass Medians
2. Sidewalks
Grass medians would allow for controlled vehicular access to both
sides of the road in a much safer manner than the current center
turning lane on the existing multi-laned portion of Bickett
Boulevard. Sidewalks would assure safety for increasing pedestrian
traffic.
The Town of Louisburg is most appreciative of the coordinated
approach DOT officials are taking to this project and proposed
widening of U.S. 401 South in Louisburg's planning jurisdiction.
Mr. Eddie McFalls and Mr. John Alford are making every effort to
avoid future problems by analyzing every possible contingency now.
We look forward to making State Project No. 8.1403001 highly
successful.
Sincerely,
L cy T. llen
Mayor
LTA/cp
A-4
KERR -TAR REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT'S
P.O. S« "I 27f WOOL' STREET NIND"SON' N.t. 2TSK
MIoos (919) 4t1491
NW USbq, 06c8dw 0"WtW
RECEIVED
wMeaII UNIT!
r'&Mfles
f,?,iWM
On1w111f
canon
v.?a
wom
mWICI'ALITIE!
euM
GMdmw
Ftwalla a
MMdNWw
Kltril l
Wivir"s
MGM
Mddt*n
Nwlim
we
11ae«+
stwo
Shall
Nap",e"
F E 6 i 1"
N. C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCE55
Review and Comment Form
N.C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE:
This office received the attached information about a
proposal which could affect your jurisdiction.
If you need more inforr.Iation contact the applicant directly.
If you wish to comment on this proposed action, c mpl g6
this form with comments and return to this office by -
If you need additional time past the due date, please contact
our office as soon as possible.
this proposal.
If no assumed youchavenno icomments received regarding above be
State Application Identifier f 96-E-Q222=QAA _ _
Commenters Name , ze, Title '4J?4
Representing
o a governmen
Address
Phone/a1 Date ?- S-- 9?
10 'd
COMMENTS: (attach additional page if necessary)
/
rc. 1
A-5
Otte Z6b 6t6=0I D03 NVI 2asm 01:60 96-bt-ZO
FM206
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATICN
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
MAILED TO
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
FRANK VICK
PLANN• E ENV. BRANCH
TRANSPORTATION BLDG./INTER-OFFICE
FROM
MS- JEANETTE FURNEY
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPING - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO US 4019 FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK RD)
TC NC 39 IN LOUISBURG TIP #R-2814E
TYPE - SCOPING
THE N.C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE FAS RECEIVED THE ABOVE PROJECT FOR
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW. THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN ASSIGNED STATE
APPLICATION NUMBER 96E42200446• PLEASE USE THIS NUMBER WITH ALL
INQUIRIES CR CORRESPONDENCE WITH THIS OFFICE.
REVIEW OF THIS PROJECT SHOULD BE COMPLETED ON OR BEFORE 02/27/96.
SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL [phone]•
GEC V
JAN 4 1996
G h
? 6N?fRUN?
A-6
14ORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
rM208
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003
02-27-96
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
MAILED TO FRCM
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION MRS- CHRYS BAGGETT
FRANK VICK DIRECTOR
PLANN- ' ENV. BRANCH N C STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
TRANSPORTATION BLDG-/INT_R-OFF
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPING - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO US 4011 FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK RD)
TO NC 39 IN LOUISBURG TIP #R-2814E
SAI NO 96E42200446 PROGRAM TITLE - SCOPING
THE ABOVE PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. AS A RESULT OF THE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING
IS SUBMITTED ( ) NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED
(X ) COMMENTS ATTACHED
SHOULD YOU HAVE AIJY CUESTIONSt PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE [phone]-
. C.C. REGION K
-IV FEB 2.9 1996
r
DIVISION Or
HIGHWAYS
?F RAW ' (P
A-7
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor p E ?--? N R
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Henry M. Lancaster II, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chrys Baggett
State Clearinghouse
FROM: Melba McGee
Project Review Coordinator
RE: 96-0446 scoping Proposed Improvements to US 401 Tar River Basin,
Franklin County
DATE: February 5, 1996
The Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources has reviewed
the proposed project. The attached comments are a result of this review. More
specific comments will be provided during the environmental review process.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond. If during the preparation of the
environmental document, additional information is needed, the applicant is
encouraged to notify our respective divisions.
attachments
RECEIVED
Ff B 6
N.C. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
A-8

p.0. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
r p`HNR ?r
Zia.
JAN I g oe
tate of North Carolina
Depar en',?? jepInent, Health, and Natural
>?ND Q YD" sign of Land Resources
James G. Vemor PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS L
Wllllam W. Cobey, Jr., 5ecretary
.Project Number: 76- D (M6 County:

JAN
QUALITY SEA"
Charlestt'Ga'"aer ?'
Director
Project Name:
Geodetic Survey
This project will impact geodetic survey markers. N.C. Geodetic
-_L?, /?-
Survey should be contacted prior to construction at P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, N.C. 27611 [phone]. Intentional destruction of a
geodetic monument is a violation of N.C. General Statute 102-4.
This project will have no impact on geodetic survey markers.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Geodetic Survey office at [phone].
Avx-
Reviewer Date
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
No comment

This project will require approval of an erosion and sedimentation
control plan prior to beginning any land-disturbing activity if more
than one (1) acre will be disturbed.
If an environmental document is required to satisfy Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) requirements, the document must be submitted as part
of the erosion and sedimentation control plan.
If any portion of the project is located within a High Quality Water
Zone (HQW), as classified by the Division of Environmental Management,
increased design standards for sediment and erosion control will apply.
The erosion and sedimentation control plan required for this project
should be prepared by the Department of Transportation under the
erosion control program delegation to the Division of Highways from the
North Carolina Sedimentation Control Commission.
Other (comments attached)
For more information contact the Land Quality Section at [phone].
i- /v - 1ye
Reviewer Date
P.O. Box 17687 • Uelgh, N.C. 27611-7c A-9 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunlty Athrmauvc,kctlon Employer
State of North Carolina Reviewing Office:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS I Project Number: I Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the EHNR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in
order for this project to comply with North Carolina Law.
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Normal Process
Regional Office. Time
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS (statutory time
limit(
O Permit to construct 6 operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions, b sewer construction contracts on-site inspection. Post-application
systems not discharging into state surface waters, technical conference usual (90 days)
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. 90120 days
O permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities Pre-application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to
discharging into state surface waters. construct wastewater treatment facility granted after NPDES Reply (NSA)
time. 30 days after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES
permit whichever is later.
30 days
Water Use Permit Pre application technical conference usually necessary
(N:Ai
7 days
Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued
prior to the installation of a well 115 days)
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property 55 days
O Dredge and Fill Permit owner. On-site inspection. Pre application conference usual Filling
may require Easement to Fill from N C. Department of (90 days)
Administration and Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
? Permit to construct 8 operate Air Pollution Abatement
f
il
S
i
i
5A NCAC 21
/
E
06
N
A 60 days
90 d
ities and
ac
or
m
on
ss
ources as per 1
H. / (
ays)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 2D.0520.
Demolition or renovations of structures containing
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15A 60 days
NCAC 2D.0525 which requires notification and removal N/A
prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
919733.0820 (90 days)
Complex Source Permit required under 15A NCAC 2D.0800. pQ •,
?-U 10 /JCK 30 c-603
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion a sedimentatio
control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (Land Quality Sect l at least 30 20 days
days before beginning activity A fee of $30 for the first acre and $2000 for each additional acre or art must accompany the Ian 130 da si
r1
L_ The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referrenced Local Ordinance (30 days)
On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with EHNR Bond amount
L Mining Permit varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any area 30 days
mined greater than one acre must be permited The appropriate bond (60 days)
must be received before the permit can be issued
1-1 North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit 1 day
exceeds 4 days (N/A)
? Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit • 22 On-site inspection by N.D. Division Forest Resources required "if more 1 day
counties in coastal N C with organic soils than five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Inspections (NIA)
should be requested at least ten days before actual burn is planned.'

NIA 90120 days
N/A
u Oil Refining Facilities t
)
It permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N C qualified engineer to prepare plans 30 days
r,
LJ Dam Safety Permit inspect construction, certify construction is according to EHNR approv
ed plans. May also require permit under mosquito control program. And 160 days)
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers An inspection of site is neces .
sary to -- - 13zard Classification. A minimum fee of $20000 must ac
comps plication. An additional processing fee based on a
percen- A-I O 1e total project cost will be required upon completion
Continued on itvri
N0.,,,
0

Istatutorr
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REOUIREMENTS limit)
File surety bond of $5,000 with EHNR running to State of N.C. 10 days
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well conditional that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon
abandonment, be plugged according to EHNR rules and regulations (N/Al
Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with EHNR at least 10 days prior to issue of permit 10 days
(NIA)
Application by letter. No standard application form.
State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include
hi 1520 days
(NIA)
p
descriptions 8 drawings of structure 8 proof of owners
of riparian property,
60 days
401 Water Quality Certification NIA (130 daysi
55 days
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development $250.00 fee must accompany application 1150 days)
22 days
CAMA Permit for MINOR development 550.00 fee must accompany application (25 days)
Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project area If any monuments need to be moved or destroyed, please notify.
N C Geodetic Survey. Box 27687. Raleigh. N C 27611
Abandonment of any wells, if required, must be in accordance with Title 15A, Subchapter 2C.0100.
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if -orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation
45 days
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H.1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required.
I
(NIA)
Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority).

FV;k
I

0
?
?
?
?
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below._
? Asheville Regional Office ? Fayetteville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Asheville, NC 28801 Fayetteville. NC 28301
[phone] [phone]
? Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
? Washington Regional Office
1424 Carolina Avenue
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
? Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive. Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
? Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive ExlLnsion
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
? Winston-Salem Regional Office
8025 North Point Blvd.
Suite 100
Winston Salen A_1 1 '106
(919) 8967007
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
A4
?
DE R
January 23, 1996
MEMRANDUR
TO: Melba McGee, Legislative & Intergovernmental Affairs
FROM: Monica SwihartvWater Quality Planning
SUBJECT: Project Review #96-0446; Scoping Comments - NC DOT
Proposed Improvements to US 401, TIP #R-2814E,
Tar River Subbasin 03-03-01
The Water Quality Section of the Division of Environmental
Management requests that the following topics be discussed in the
environmental documents prepared on the subject project:
A. Identify the streams potentially impacted by the project.
The stream classifications should be current.
B. Identify the linear feet of stream channelizations/
relocations. If the original stream banks were vegetated,
it is requested that the channelized/relocated stream banks
be revegetated.
C. Number of stream crossings.
D. Will permanent spill catch basins be utilized? DEM requests
that these catch basins be placed at all water supply stream
crossings. Identify the responsible party for maintenance.
E. Identify the stormwater controls (permanent and temporary)
to be employed. DEM recommends that no weep holes be
installed in bridges that drain directly into surface
waters.
F. Please ensure that sediment and erosion and control measures
are not placed in wetlands.
G. Wetland Impacts
1) Identify the federal manual used for identifying and
delineating jurisdictional wetlands.
2) Have wetlands been avoided as much as possible?
3) Have wetland impacts been minimized?
4) Discuss wetland impacts by plant communities affected.
5) Discuss the quality of wetlands impacted.
6) Summarize the total wetland impacts.
7) List the 401 General Certification numbers requested
from DEM.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Emplo' A-12 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Melba McGee
January 23, 1996
Page 2
H. Will borrow locations be in wetlands? Borrow/waste areas
should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
Prior to approval of any borrow/waste site in a wetland, the
contractor shall obtain a 401 Certification from DEM.
I. Did NCDOT utilize the existing road alignments as much as
possible? Why not (if applicable)?
J. To what extent can traffic congestion management techniques
alleviate the traffic problems in the study area?
K. Please provide a conceptual mitigation plan to help the
environmental review. The mitigation plan may state the
following:
1. Compensatory mitigation will be considered only after
wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent possible.
2. On-site, in-kind mitigation is the preferred method of
mitigation. In-kind mitigation within the same
watershed is preferred over out-of-kind mitigation.
3. Mitigation should be in the following order:
restoration, creation, enhancement, and lastly banking.
Please note that a 401 Water Quality Certification cannot be
issued until the conditions of NCAC 15A: 01C.0402 (Limitations on
Actions During NCEPA Process) are met. This regulation prevents
DEM from issuing the 401 Certification until a FONSI or Record of
Decision (ROD) has been issued by the Department requiring the
document. If the 401 Certification application is submitted for
review prior to issuance of the FONSI or ROD, it is recommended
that the applicant state that the 401 will not be issued until
the applicant informs DEM that the FONSI or ROD has been signed
by the Department.
Written concurrence of 401 Water Quality Certification may
be required for this project. Applications requesting coverage
under our General Certification 14 or General Permit 31 will
require written concurrence. Please be aware that 401
Certification may be denied if wetland or water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
11155.mem
cc: Eric Galamb
A-13

FALLS LAKE
N ?
TEL:[phone] Feb 01'96 8:54 No.002 P.06
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919.733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melha McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DEIINR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project C ator
Habitat Conservation Progrant
DATE: February 1, 1996
SUBJECT, Rrrlrnrsl thr information from tho N, C. Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) regarding fish and wildlife concerns for US 401, from SR 17uu
(Fox Park Road) to NC 39 in Louisburg, Franklin County, North Carolina,
TIP No. R-2814E, SCH Project No. 96-0446.
This memorandum responds to a request from Mr. H. Franklin Vick of the
NCDOT for our concerns regarding impacts on fish and wildlife resources resulting from
the subject project. Biologists on the staff of the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission
(NC'WRC) have reviewed the proposed improvements, and our comments arc provided in
accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
At this time the NCWRC has no specific recommendations or concerns regarding
the sul?ject project. However, to help facilitate document preparation and the review
process, our general informational needs are outlined below:
1. Description of fishery and wildlife resources within the project area,
including a listing of federally or state designated threatened, endangered,
or special concern species. Potential borrow areas to be used Im protect
construction should be included in the inventories. A listing of designated
plant species can be developed through consultation with:
The Natural Heritage Program
N. C. Division of Parks and Recreation
P. O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
and,
A-14
r',FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] Feb 01'96 8:54 No.002 P.07
Memo 2 February 1, 1996
NCDA Plant Conservation Program
P. O. Box 27647
Raleigh, N. C. 27611
[phone]
2. Description of any streams or wetlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocating portions of streams crossed and the extent of
such activities.
3. Cover type maps showing wetland acreages impacted by the project.
Wetland acreages should include all project-related areas that may undergo
hydrologic change as a result of ditching, other drainage, or tilling for
project construction. Wetland identification may be accomplished through
coordination with the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the COE
is not consulted, the person delineating wetlands should be identified and
criteria listed.
4. Cover type maps showing acreages of upland wildlife habitat impacted by the
proposed project. Pote-ntiAl hnrrnw sims should he included,
5. The extent to which the project will result in loss, degradation, or
fragmentation of wildlife habitat (wetlands or uplands).
6. Mitigation for avoiding, it inimizing or compensating for direct and indirect
degradation in habitat quality as well as quantitative losses.
7. A cumulative impact assessment section which analyzes the environmental
of sects of highway construction and quantifies the contribution of this
individual project to environmental degradation.
8. A discussion of the probable impacts on natural resources which will result
from secondary development facilitated by the improved road access.
9. If construction of this facility is to be coordinated with other state, municipal,
or private development projects, a description of these projects should be
included in the environmental document, and all project sponsors should
be identified.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in the early planning stages for
this project. if we can further assist your office, please contact David Cox, Highway
Project Coordinator, at [phone].
cc: 1 loward Hall, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
A-15
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
- WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO March 4, 1996
ATTENTION OF
Special Studies and
Flood Plain Services Section
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
50'
?E
Q?
MAC11196
' `.''y V r
L ID
`\NVJR0
This is in response to your letter of December 21, 1995, to the Regulatory Branch
requesting our comments on "US 401, from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 in
Louisburg, Franklin County, Federal Aid Project No. STP-401(4), State Project
No. 8.1403001, TIP Project R-2814E" (Regulatory Branch Action I.D. No. 199602010).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources, which
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
As requested in our November 13, 1995, letter to you, please provide a copy of
future scoping letters and planning-stage environmental review documents to the
attention of Mr. Coleman Long of my office, as well as a copy to the appropriate
Regulatory Field Office (RFO). We will then coordinate with the RFO to provide a single
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers response.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
C. E. Shuford, Jr., P.E.
Acting Chief, Engineering and
Planning Division
Enclosure
A-16
March 4, 1996
Page 1 of 1
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT. COMMENTS ON:
"US 401, from SR 1700 (Fox Park Road) to NC 39 in Louisburg, Franklin County,
Federal Aid Project No. STP-401(4), State Project No. 8.1403001, TIP Project R-2814E"
(Regulatory Branch Action 1. D. No. 199602010)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC - Mr. Bobby L Willis Special Studies and Flood Plain
Services Section, at [phone]
The proposed project is located in Louisburg, which participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program. From a review of Panels 1 and 2 and the index of the March 1988
Louisburg Flood Insurance Rate Map, the roadway does not appear to be in an
identified flood hazard area. This is confirmed by a review of the pertinent United
States Geological Survey topographic map of the area. The road does appear to come
close to a small tributary of the Tar River. However, the drainage area is not large
enough to pose a significant flooding problem.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS: POC - Mr. Eric Alsmeyer. Raleigh Field Office.
Regulatory Branch, at [phone]. Extension 23
a. Review of the project indicates that the proposed work would not likely involve the
discharge of excavated or fill material into waters and/or wetlands. However, the
proposed improvements may come close to an unnamed tributary to the Tar River,
above headwaters.
b. Prior Department of the Army permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated
or fill material into waters and/or wetlands in conjunction with this project, including the
disposal of construction debris. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should
first be avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensation or mitigation for
unavoidable impacts. When final plans are completed, including the extent and location
of any work within waters of the United States and wetlands, our Regulatory Branch
would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for a project-specific
determination of Department of the Army permit requirements. It is likely, if the impacts
from the proposed project are minor, that the work could be authorized under one or
more nationwide or regional general permits.
c. Questions or comments pertaining to permits may be directed to Mr. Alsmeyer.
A-17
Copies Furnished (with enclosure
and incoming correspondence):
JMs. Stephanie Briggs
Supervisor, Permits Section
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Division of Highways
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dr. G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
-2-
A-18
?_w c roff 5
Pt?ENT OF TyF United States Department of the Interior
OAP -' /y'`
H $ FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
MgOCH Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 ! co E a? ?I w
March 27, 1996 r
Mr. H. Franklin Vick MAR 2 b 1995
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways .--)S1CeN OF
P.O. Box 25201 G? 6iRGti?Nf;YS
Raleigh, NC 27611 ?Q
Subject: Widening of US 401 from SR 1700 to NC 39?
Franklin County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2814)
Dear Mr. Vick:
This responds to your letter of December 21, 1995 requesting information from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for evaluating the potential
environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. This report provides
scoping information and is provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543). This report also serves
as comments to federal and state resource agencies for use in their permitting
and/or certification processes for this project.
Preliminary planning by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
calls for the widening of US 401 from a two-lane roadway to a five-lane curb and
gutter facility.
The Service's mission is to provide the leadership to conserve, protect, and
enhance fish and wildlife and their habitats for the continuing benefit of all
people. Due to staffing limitations, we are unable to provide you with site-
specific comments at this time. However, the following recommendations should
help guide the planning process and facilitate our review of the project.
Generally, the Service recommends that wetland impacts be avoided and minimized
to the maximum extent practicable as outlined in the Clean Water Act Section
404(b) (1) Guidelines. If unavoidable wetland impacts are proposed, we recommend
that every effort be made to identify compensatory mitigation sites in advance.
Opportunities to protect target areas in perpetuity, preferably via conservation
easement, should be explored at the outset.
Regarding avoidance and minimization of impacts, we generally recommend that
proposed highway projects be aligned along or adjacent to existing roadways,
utility corridors, or previously developed areas in order to minimize habitat
fragmentation and encroachment. Areas exhibiting high biodiversity or ecological
value important to the watershed and/or region should be avoided. Crossings of
streams and associated wetland systems should use existing crossings and/or occur
on structure wherever feasible. Where bridging is not feasible, culvert
structures that maintain natural water flows and circulation regimes without
scouring or impeding fish and wildlife passage should be employed. Highway
shoulder and median width should be reduced through wetland areas. Roadway
embankments and fill areas should be stabilized by using appropriate erosion
control devices and/or techniques. Wherever appropriate, construction in
sensitive areas should occur outside of anadromous fish spawning and migratory
bird nesting seasons.
A-19
We reserve the right to review any required federal or state permits at the time
of public notice issuance. Resource agency coordination should occur early in
the planning process to resolve land use conflicts and minimize delays.
In addition to the above guidance, we recommend that the environmental
documentation for this project include the following (the level of detail should
be commensurate with the degree of environmental impacts):
1. A clearly defined purpose and need for the proposed project including a
discussion of the project's independent utility;
2. An analysis of the alternatives to the proposed project that were
considered, including a no action alternative;
3. A description of the fishery and wildlife resources within the action
area of the proposed project which may be affected directly or
indirectly;
4. The extent and acreage of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, that
are to be impacted by filling, dredging, clearing, ditching, and/or
draining. Wetland impact acreages should be differentiated by habitat
type based on the wetland classification scheme of the National Wetlands
Inventory. Wetland boundaries should be determined by using the 1987
Corps of Enaineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and verified by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers;
5. The anticipated environmental impacts, both temporary and permanent,
that would be likely to occur as a direct result of the proposed
project. Also, an assessment should be included regarding the extent to
which the proposed project would result in secondary impacts to natural
resources and how this and similar projects contribute to cumulative
adverse effects;
6. Techniques which would be employed to design and construct wetland
crossings, relocate stream channels, and restore, enhance, or create
wetlands for compensatory mitigation;
7. Mitigation measures which would be employed to avoid, minimize, rectify,
reduce, or compensate for habitat value losses associated with the
project. These measures should include a detailed compensatory
mitigation plan for offsetting unavoidable wetland impacts.
The attached page identifies the Federally-listed endangered, threatened, and
candidate species that are known to occur in Franklin County. Habitat
requirements for the Federally-listed species in the project area should be
compared with the available habitat at the project site. If suitable habitat is
present within the action area of the project, field surveys for the species
should be performed, and survey methodologies and results included in the
environmental documentation for this project. In addition to this guidance, the
following information should be included in the environmental document regarding
protected species (the level of detail should be commensurate with the degree of
environmental impacts):
1. A specific description of the proposed action to be considered;
2. A description and accompanying map of the specific area used in the
analysis of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts;
3. A description of the biology and status of the listed species and of the
associated habitat that may be affected by the action, including the
results of an onsite inspection;
4. An analysis of the "effects of the action" on the listed species and
associated habitat:
A-20
a. Direct and indirect impacts of the project on listed species.
Indirect effects are those that are caused by the proposed action
and are later in time but are still rea$onably certain to occur;
b. A discussion of the environmental baseline which includes
interrelated, interdependent, past and present impacts of Federal,
State, and private activities in the project and cumulative effects
area;
C. Interrelated actions are those that are part of a larger action and
depend on the larger action for their justification;
d. Cumulative impacts of future State and private activities (not
requiring Federal agency involvement, that will be considered as
part of future Section 7 consultation);
5. Summary of evaluation criteria used as a measurement of potential effects;
6. A description of the manner in which the action may affect any listed
species or associated habitat including project proposals to
reduce/eliminate adverse effects;
7. Based on evaluation criteria, a determination of whether the project is
not likely to adversely affect or may affect threatened and endangered
species.
Candidate species are those plant and animal species for which the Service has
sufficient information on their biological status and threats to their survival
to propose them as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). Although candidate species receive no statutory protection under the ESA,
Federal agencies are required to informally confer with the Service on actions
likely to jeopardize the continued existence of these species or that may destroy
or modify proposed critical habitat. Species of concern include those species
for which the Service does not have enough scientific information to support a
listing proposal or species which do not warrant listing at the present time.
Species of Concern receive no statutory protection under the ESA, but could
become candidates in the future if additional scientific information becomes
available indicating they are endangered or threatened. Formal listing places
the species under the full protection of the ESA, and necessitates a new survey
if its status in the project corridor is unknown. Therefore, it would be prudent
for the project to avoid any adverse impact to candidate species or their
habitat. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program should be contacted for
information on species under State protection.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please
continue to advise us of the progress made in the planning process, including
your official determination of the impacts of this project.
Attachment
A-21
REVISED APRIL 19, 1995
Franklin County
Clams
Dwarf wedge mussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) - E
Tar spinymussel (Elliotio steinstansana) - E
Plan
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) - E
There are species which, although not now listed or officially proposed for listing as endangered or
threatened, are under status review by the Service. These "Candidate"(C1 and C2) species are not legally
protected under the Act, and are not subject to any of Its provisions, including Section 7, until they are
formally proposed or listed as threatened or endangered. We are providing the below list of candidate
species which may occur within the project area for the purpose of giving you advance notification. These
species may be listed in the future, at which time they will be protected under the Act. In the meantime,
we would appreciate anything you might do for them.
Clams
Atlantic plgtoe (mussel) (Fusconaia masoni) - C2
Yellow lampmussel (Lamosilis ri sa) - C2
Yellow lance (mussel) (Elliotio n I a) - C2
Plants
Wavyleaf wild quinine (Parthenium radfordii) - C2"
"Indicates no specimen in at least 20 years from this county.
A-22
E"T °° ryF United States Department of the Interior

s FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
_ Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
North Carolina 27636-3726
h
R
l
i
,
a
e
g
RCH

March 5, 1997
CtWuU
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation

PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
ATTN: Mr. Eddie McFalls, P.E., Project Planning Engineer
RE: Proposed Widening of US401, from SR1700 to Nc 39, Duisburg, Franklin
County; TIP Project #R-2814E
Dear Mr. Vick:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife (Service) has reviewed your February 20, 1997
letter regarding the above-referenced project in Franklin County in North
Carolina. Our comments are provided in accordance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Based on the North Carolina Department of Transportation's agreement to
implement Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters
and High Quality Waters, and the fact that previous and recent surveys
have not located the Tar spinymussel in the immediate area of the
proposed project, the Service concurs that this project is not likely to
adversely affect the Federally-endangered Tar spinymussel (Elliptio
steinstansana) or any Federally-listed endangered and threatened species
or their formally designated critical habitat.
We believe that the requirements of Section 7 of the Act have been
satisfied. We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consultation
must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this
identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a
manner not previously considered; (2) this action is subsequently
modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; (3) a new
species is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by
the identified action.
Thank you for your cooperation with our agency.
Sincerely,
ohn M. He er
Field Supervisor
FWS/R4:CMartino:cm:3-4-97/919-856-4520:WP51:NCDOT:US401Frkln.ne
A-23
January 31, 1997
Engineering Office
SUBJECT: DOT Project Near Louisburg Armory
Mr. Edward B. McFalls
Project Planning Engineer
Department of Transportation, Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. McFalls:
Thank you for informing us of DOT's plan for widening US 401 in Louisburg near the National
Guard Armory. 1 have discussed the project with CPT Harris at the armory, and the project should cause
no significant hardship for our people.
There are two items we would like you to consider when the final design is completed. First of
all, the primary entrance to the armory property is the northernmost entrance, i.e., the driveway nearest the
main entrance. Your plan calls for the median opening to be provided at the other parking lot entrance,
which currently is only a gravel covered area. We feel that the median opening should be placed where the
most traffic occurs. Secondly, the volume of traffic in and out of the armory lot after public functions is
substantial. We strongly recommend that a traffic light should be installed to make entrance and egress
less risky.
Thank you again for your efforts to keep us informed. Call me at 919-664-6117 if you have
comments or concerns.
DANNY W. SELL
MAJ, EN, NCARNG
Assistant Construction & Facilities
Management Officer
CF: CPT Harris, Louisburg Armory
A-24
APPENDIX B
CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP INFORMATION

NOTICE OF A CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP
FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING/IMPROVEMENTS OF US 401
FROM FOX PARK ROAD (SR 1700) TO NC 39 IN LOUISBURG
Project 8.1403001 R-2814E Franklin County
A citizens informational workshop will be held on
Thursday, July 11, 1996 in the Employee Training Center at
the Louisburg Police Department located at 104 Wade Avenue in
Louisburg. This will be an informal open-house workshop
conducted between the hours of 4:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. Those
wishing to attend may do so at their convenience during these
hours.
The purpose of this informational workshop is to present
information, answer questions, and receive comments during
the planning, and early design stages of the proposed
widening/improvements of US 401 from Fox Park Road to NC 39
in Louisburg. The project proposes to widen this segment of
US 401 to a multi-lane facility.
Representatives of the Department of Transportation will
be available to discuss the proposed project with those
attending. Anyone desiring additional information about the
workshop may contact Mr. Eddie McFalls, North Carolina
Department of Transportation, Planning and Environmental
Branch, P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611 or by telephone at
[phone] - Extension 245.
NCDOT will provide auxiliary aids and services for
disabled persons who wish to participate in the workshop. Tb
receive special services, please call Mr. McFalls at the
above number to give adequate notice prior to the date of the
workshop.

B-1
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch

m?
1
OF TRA
O
a
jc?
4qr)
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
JULY I I , 1996
CITIZENS INFORMATIONAL WORKSHOP
B-2
.-4Q RTW
CITIZENS INFORMATIONALWORKSHOP
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD) TO NC 39
LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
Pumose of the Citizens Informational Worksho
The purpose of this Citizens Informational Workshop is to involve the public in
the project planning process. If you have comments or suggestions about the proposed
improvements described in this handout, please let a representative of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation know. A comment sheet is provided for you to write
down your questions and concerns so that we can keep a record of and fully
consider your ideas, comments, and suggestions.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation realizes individuals living close
to a proposed project want to be informed of the possible effects of the project on their
homes and businesses. However, exact information is not available at this stage of the
planning process. Additional design work is necessary before the actual right of way
limits can be established. More detailed information will be available at a later date.
Written comments on this project may be left with North Carolina Department of
Transportation representatives at the citizens informational workshop or submitted
through the mail. If additional information is needed or you would like to submit
comments after the citizens informational workshop, please address your requests and
comments to:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Description and Purpose of the Project
The North Carolina Department of Transportation's 1997-2003 Transportation
Improvement Program proposes to widen US 401 in Louisburg from SR 1700 (Fox Park
Road) to NC 39 (see Figure 1). A multilane facility will be constructed to increase the
traffic carrying capacity of this section of US 401. Two typical sections are being
considered for the proposed roadway: a five-lane undivided curb and gutter facility and a
four-lane curb and gutter facility with a raised, grassed median. These typical sections are
included as Figure 2 of this handout. The five-lane undivided typical section would
provide two through lanes in each direction and a center left turn lane that would serve
both directions of travel. This typical section would provide the highest degree of access
to adjacent properties. The four-lane divided typical section would provide two through
B-3
lanes in each direction but would not provide a continuous left turn lane. Left turn lanes
would be provided at a limited number of median openings along the roadway. The
raised island provided by this alternative would control left turn movements onto and off
of the facility and would result in better operating conditions along the highway than the
continuous left turn lane; however, a lesser degree of access to adjacent properties would
be provided
Also as a part of TIP Project R-2814 E, the intersection of NC 56, SR 1229 (Main
Street), and US 401 will be redesigned. Currently, NCDOT plans to create two "T"
intersections at this location. In the vicinity of this intersection, both directions of
US 401 will be routed to follow an alignment that will closely resemble the present
alignment of the northbound lane of US 401 at the existing intersection. NC 56 is
anticipated to intersect US 401 and SR 1229 (Main Street) is anticipated to intersect
NC 56. Please note that this intersection design is preliminary and may change as more
design work is done and comments from citizens and local officials are received.
Once TIP Project R-2814 E, the remaining sections of TIP Project R-2814, and
TIP Project R-2425 are constructed, US 401 will provide a continuous multilane facility
between Raleigh and Louisburg. This multilane roadway will provide more efficient and
safer travel for the entire region.
Estimated Traffic Volumes on US 401
In 1999, the anticipated construction year of the proposed project, the average
daily traffic along the proposed project is anticipated to vary from 8,800 vehicles per day
(on US 401 between SR 1700 and NC 56) to 15,320 vehicles per day (on US 401, just
north of the US 401/NC 56/SR 1229 intersection). In 2019, the average daily traffic
along this section of US 401 is anticipated to vary from 13,480 vehicles per day (on US
401 between SR 1700 and NC 56) to 23,280 vehicles per day (on US 401, just north of
the US 401/NC 56/SR 1229 intersection.
Transportation Improvement Program Schedules and Costs
In the 1997-2003 Transportation Improvement Program, TIP Project R-2814 E is
scheduled for right of way acquisition in fiscal year 1998 and construction in fiscal year
1999. TIP Project R-2814 E is a single segment of TIP Project R-2814. Table 1
summarizes the current funding schedules for TIP Project R-2814 E, as well as those of
the other project segments. Please note the following: TIP Project R-2814 A will widen ,
US 401 from SR 2044 to north of SR 2226 in Wake County, TIP Project R-2814 B will
widen US 401 from north of SR 2226 to NC 96 in Wake County, TIP Project R-2814 C
will widen US 401 from NC 96 in Wake County to SR 1103 in Franklin County, and TIP
Project R-2814 D will widen US 401 from SR 1103 to SR 1700 in Franklin County.
B-4
TABLE 1. Transportation Improvement Program Schedules and Funding
Project Segment Schedule for
Right of Way
Ac uistion Funding for Right
of Way
Acquisition Schedule for
Project
Construction Funding for
Construction
R-2814 A *FFY 2000 $ 5,000,000 FFY 2002 $ 8,000,000
R-2814 B FFY 2003 $ 4,000,000 PY $ 5,000,000
R-2814 C *PY $ 8,000,000 PY $ 8,800,000
R-2814 D PY $ 7,500,000 PY $ 8,100,000
R-2814 E FFY 1998 $ 100,000 FFY 1999 $ 1,500,000
* FFY denotes "federal fiscal year."
PY indicates that the project is "post year" (not currently funded within the seven year TIP. The TIP is
updated each year and post year projects may become funded.
Notes: 1. Project schedules are subject to availability of funds.
2. Cost estimates will be udpated as a part of the planning process
Current Proiect Status
A Categorical Exclusion is currently being prepared for the proposed project. This
document is anticipated to be completed this summer. This document will summarize the
improvements to US 401 that will be included under TIP Project R-2814 E and the resulting
environmental impacts. Environmental data is currently being gathered along this section of
US 401 in order to prepare this document. This environmental data will be used in conjunction
with preliminary design, input from the Town of Louisburg, and input from citizens in the area to
determine what improvements will be made. Preliminary design has not yet been completed for
the project; therefore, specific impacts to adjacent properties cannot be determined at this time.
A separate environmental document, an environmental assessment, will be prepared for
the remaining sections of TIP Project R-2814. As a part of its preparation, additional citizens
informational workshops will be scheduled.
Anticipated Right of Way Impacts
The widening of this section of US 401 will require the purchase of additional right of
way and easments from adjacent property owners; but, the proposed project is not anticipated to
require the relocation of any residences or businesses. Unfortunately, until both environmental
studies and preliminary designs are completed, specific right of way impacts to individual
properties cannot be determined.
t Future Public Coordination
After the categorical exclusion is completed for the proposed project (currently
anticipated to be completed in the summer of 1996), a public hearing will be scheduled to present
NCDOT's recommendations. At that time, more detailed information about the project's impacts
will be available. Everyone on the project's mailing list will be notified once the public hearing
is scheduled.
EBM
B-5
- ?. same left
39 -
-wood
Centervdl
Ingleside J /
v
?tF R'A-'NSL I N
+LowsDury :.ti rYYY 9
nklinton r? U r- 511 56
/
A ?
? r?// Ms0levdle lusLCe
96
? ? Ikk-I @96j
Yountsvdle t 39 to p E ,/
? ? ?'? IA 1 _ ,1
? New oCe
Sp FRANKLIN
, Bunn
? / ;?? ?-? COUNTY
? _ 11er?Pe rces 98'
44 F'101

i 1211
/ / y 1

/ !

I ? 1230
/ I

228
/ 1264 I 1 •37 11 1229
i
?

Q. 1225 c-
?c
CC, 1230 /
/
` . '? /• END
`
O 1 PROJECT
:n 401
\?`,2? 1 R-2814E
/
I
1
r 56 I
1

1 1 1 1
BEGIN - - '?
PROJECT
R-2814 E 1700
a?1
1775 0)
\ ? 4l
\ 1772
1700
B-6

r
39 $
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF I
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
US 401
SR 1700 TO NC 39 IN LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY [
T.I.P. PROJECT NO. R-2814 E
i
FiG. 1
ALTERNATIVE TYPICAL SECTIONS
2.4 m
2.4 m (8 feet)
(e feet) 9.6 m 9.6 m
(32 feet) ?- (32 feet)
0.15 m 0.15 m
(0.5 feet). (0.5 feet)
9m tIS 9m
(30 feet) (30 feet)
VZ.
ALTERNATIVE 1:
FIVE-LANE, UNDIVIDED, CURB AND GUTTER TYPICAL SECTION
2.4 m 2.4 in , 2.4 m , 7.8 m 2.4 m
(e feet) 7.8 m (8 fat) (8 fat) (e feet)
(26 feet) (26 feet)
7.2m 2.1m 2.1m 7.2m
(24 feet) (7 fat) (7 feet) , (24 feet)
0.15 m 0.15 m 0.15 m 0.15 m
0.5 feet) (0.5 leer) (0.5 feet) (0.5 feet)
v'vP.
ALTERNATIVE 2:
t FOUR-LANE, DIVIDED, CURB AND GUTTER TYPICAL SECTION
B-7
N.
US 401
FROM SR 1700 (FOX PARK ROAD)
TO NC 39 IN LOUISBURG
FRANKLIN COUNTY
TIP PROJECT R-2814 E
NO SCALE FIGURE 2
July 11, 1996
TIP Project R-2814 E
Louisburg, Franklin County
US 401
From SR 1700 (Fox Park Road)
to NC 39 (Bunn Road)
Citizens Informational Workshop
Comment Sheet
Comments:
Please send comments to: H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
r
•
B-8