19951250 Ver 2_Complete File_20100727

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Environmental Management A4
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
p E H N
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 7, 1997
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
NC DOT
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512)
Project #951250, COE #199301490
Richmond County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3094 issued to the N.C. Department of
Transportation dated 7 January 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Attachments
951250.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers - -
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
.. &D y
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Enviro. Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 500/6 recycled/100/6 post consumer paper
Sincerely,
NORTH. CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to N.C. Dept. of
Transportation resulting in 24.058 hectares (59.42 acres) of permanent wetland impact and 0.688
hectares (1.70 acres) of temporary wetland impact in Richmond County pursuant to an application
filed on the 29th day of November of 1995 and 13th day of September 1996 to construct the US
74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters
of Hitchcock Creek, Cape Fear Branch, 3 tributaries to Solomons Creek, Solomon Creek, Marks
Creek and Black Branch Creek in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a
violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of
North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application
and conditions hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase
in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (50
NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs in trout waters).
2. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation
will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
3. Prior to the commencement of any roadway work on TIP R-0512A, B, C, D, E
and F, the North Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally
binding contract to purchase or option to buy the Long Swamp mitigation site,
consisting of approximately 200 acres.
4. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on R-0512D, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally binding contract to
purchase or option to buy the Gibson Pond mitigation site that will provide, at a
minimum, 30 acres of wetland preservation, or 6 acres of wetland restoration, or
12 acres of wetland enhancement to compensate for the wetland impacts at Marks
Creek and the mechanized clearing beyond the fill slopes.
5. The compensatory mitigation plan for TIP R-0512A, B, C, D, E and F shall be
finalized and approved by the District Engineer prior to the commencement of
any roadway construction on TIP R-0512A, B, C, D and E.
6. All construction and planting activities at the Long Swamp mitigation site shall be
completed prior to the completion of roadway construction on TIP R-0512E and
TIP R-0512F.
7. At Black Branch Creek, between station 110+66 and 111+43, the permittee or its
contractor shall cause to be installed one (1) 48-inch pipe culvert through the "&
causeway fill on the west side of the box culvert and two (2) 48-inch pipe
culverts on the east side of the box culvert. The culverts will be placed generally
parallel to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box
culvert and the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at
least one (1) foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
8. At Black Branch Creek, at station 111+00, all spoil material from the excavation
of the new creek channel between the outfall of the box culvert to the existing
creek channel shall be deposited on high ground.
9. At Solomon Creek between station 126+50 and stations 127+45, the
permittee shall cause to be installed two (2) 48-inch pipe culverts in the causeway
fill on the west side of the box culvert and three (3) 48-inch pipe culverts on the
east side of the box culvert. The pipe culverts shall be placed generally parallel
to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and
the wedand/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1)
foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
10. At Solomon Creek, at station 126+60, all spoil material from the excavation of
the new creek channel on the north and south side of the road shall be deposited
on high ground. ,
11. At Marks Creek, between station 177+75 and station 178+80, the permittee shall
cause to be installed four (4) 60-inch pipe culverts in the causeway fill on the
west side of Marks Creek. The culverts shall be placed generally parallel to the
box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and the
wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1) foot
below the grade of the existing floodplain. The relocated stream must have the
same pre-construction width and depth.
12. Between station 158+00 and station 159+00 the permittee shall install one (1)
additional 36-inch pipe culvert on the east side of the box culvert. The exact
location of the additional pipe culvert shall be at the discretion of the permittee.
13. All stream relocation (post-construction) must have pre-construction width and
depth.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of
the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 7th day of January 1997
OF WATER QUALITY
n Howar , Jr. E.

WQC 3094
SENT BY:Wilmington District ;12-19-96 ; 16:32 ; USAGE-Reg, Branch-; 919 733 99594 1
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL HEADER SHEIET
Foy wsr aI if" form, w AP x-11; MN PrE OWt Wow' a CJCf18014
NAME/ t7FFICE TELEP40NE FAQ Na.
A
CCIMMANDI OFFICE
OFFICE SYMBOL rAUfOVGMftCanm.) )
Tb.
PAGES DATE-TIME MONTH YE11R FtELEASA'S SICINATUF4E
CLAB$1FICAiION 1iRE'CED?NCE f udIng009
Hoodor)
AEMAWS
r
9Now Fw ftodowlaso nn omw We Only

QA FCM 391". ALKM 72 18 COOMETE
SENT BY;Wilmington District ;12-19-96 ; 16:33 USACE-Reg. Branch-+ 919 733 9959;9 2
NOTE - SPECIAL CONDITIONS TO GQ ON PAGE 3 OF ENG FORM 1721 ARE:
a. With the exception of special condition b., below, all
work authorized by this permit must be done in strict compliance
with the attached plans, which are a part of this permit,
b. Clearing in wetlands shall not extend beyond five (5)
feet from the slope stake line as shown on the plans. This
additional 5-foot clearing limit shall not be mechanically
cleared (i.e., grubbed), nor shall it be planted with any
perennial turfgrass.
C. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on TIP
R-0512A,B,C,D,E,F, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation shall have a legally binding contract to purchase
or option to buy the Long Swamp mitigation site, consisting of
approximately 200 acres, as described on attachment A.
d. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on R-
0512D the North Carolina Department of Transportation shall have
a legally binding contract to purchase or option to buy, an
additional mitigation site acceptable to the District Engineer
that will provide, at a minimum, 30 acres of wetland
preservation, or 6 acres of wetland restoration, or 12 acres of
wetland enhancement.
e. The compensatory mitigation plan for the Long Swamp Site
and the additional mitigation site identified in special
condition (d.) above, shall be finalized and approved by the
District Engineer prior to the commencement of any roadway
construction on TIP R-0512A,B,C,D,E.
f. All construction and planting activities at the Long Swamp
mitigation site shall be completed prior to the completion of
roadway construction on TIP R-0512E and TIP R-0512F.
g. The mitigation sites will be maintained by the permittee
in their natural condition, as altered by the mitigation plan, in
perpetuity. Prohibited activities within the mitigation area
specifically include, but are not limited to, the eonatruction or
placement of structures of any kind; the discharge of dredged or
fill material (including waste debrie); excavation; the cutting,
SENT BY:Wilmington District :12-19-96 ; 16:33 U5ACE-Reg. Branch-+ 919 733 9959:# 3
removal or damage of any vegetation; and grading, leveling, or
any other earth moving activity, except as clearly described in
the mitigation plan approved pursuant to condition d, above.
h. Failure to initiate and carry out the details of special
conditions c, d, a and f, above, in accordance with all
construction phases contained therein, will result in a directive
to cease all ongoing and permitted work within wetlands
associated with the construction of the Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass
(TIP R-0512A,3,C,D,E,F)or such other remedy as the District
Engineer or his authorized rapreeentatives may seek,
i. Any sale, lease or other conveyance of the mitigation
site shall include restrictions on the use of the property as
described in these conditions, which conditions shall be enforced
by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
j. All land disturbing activity associated with the highway
construction will be conducted in a way that prevents a
significant increase in turbidity outside the area of
construction or construction-related discharge. Increases such
that the turbidity in the water body is 50 NTU's or lees are not
considered significant.
k. The permittee and its contractors and/or agents shall not
excavate, fill, or perform mechanized land clearing at any time
in the construction or maintenance of this project within waters
and/or wetlands, except as authorized by this permit, or any
modification to this permit. There shall be no excavation from
or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of
this permit,
1. To ensure that all borrow and waste activities occur on
high ground, except as authorized by this permit, the permittee
shall require its contractors and/or agents to identify all areas
to be used to borrow material, or to dispose of dredged, fill, or
waste material.. The permittee shall ensure that all such areas
comply with condition (k.) of this permit, and shall require and
maintain documentation of the location and characteristics of all
borrow and disposal sites associated with this project. This
information will include data regarding soils, vegetation and
SENT BY:Wilmington District ;12-19-96 ; 15:34 ; USACE-Reg. Branch-4 919 739 9959;# 4
hydrology sutfiaient to clearly demonstrate compliance with
special condition (k.) above. This information will be available
to the Corps of Engineers on request.
M. The permittee shall require its contractors and/Or agents
to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit in the
construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide
each of its contractors and/or agents associated with the
construction or maintenance of this project with a copy of this
permit.
n. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated
materials within waters or wetlands is not authorized.
o. At Black Branch Creek, between station 110166 and 111+43,
the permittee or its contractor shall cause to be installed one
(1) 48-inch pipe culvert through the causeway fill on the west
side of the box culvert and two (2) 48-inch pipe culverts on the
east side of the box culvert. The culverts will be placed
generally parallel to the box culverts and equally spaced between
the edge of the box culvert and the wetland/upland boundary. The
invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1) foot below the
grade of the existing floodplain.
P. At Black Branch Creek, at station 111+00, all spoil
material from the excavation of the new creek channel between the
outfall of the box culvert to the existing creek channel shall be
deposited on high ground.
q. At Solomons Creek, between station 126+g0 and station
127+45, the permittee shall cause to be installed two (2) 48-inch
pipe culverts in the causeway fill on the west side of the box
culvert and three (3) 48-inch pipe culverts on the east side of
the box culvert. The pipe culverts shall be planed generally
parallel to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge
of the box culvert and the wetland/upland boundary. The invert
of the culverts shall be at least one (1) foot below the grade of
the existing floodplain,
r. At Solomons creek, at station 126 +60, all spoil material
from the excavation of the new creek channel on the north and
south side of the road shall be deposited on high ground.
. .. . SENT BY;Wilmington District ;12-19-96 ; 16;34 ; USAGE-Reg. Branch-? 919 733 9959;# 5
s. At Marks Creek, between station 177+75 and station 178+90,
the permittee shall cause to be installed four (4) 60-inch pipe
culverts in the causeway fill on t.h& west side a. Markg .ales.
The culverts shall be placed generally parallel to the box
culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert
and the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts
shall be at least one (1) foot below the grade of the existing
floodplain.
t. Betwean station, 158+00 and station 159+00 the permittee
shall install one (1) additional 36-inch pipe culvert on the
east side of the box culvert. The exact location of the
additional pipe culvert shell be at the discretion of the
permittee.
u. All fill material will be clean and free of any
pollutants except in trace quantities,
v. All fill material will be immediately stabilized and
maintained to prevent erosion and sediment into adjacent waters
or wetlands.
W. Pre-construction substrate and wetland bottom contours
will be restored in all temporary impact areas in wetlands. All
excess material will be removed to a high-ground retention area.
X, If the permittee discovers any previously unknown
historic Or archeological remains while accomplishing the
authorized work, he will immediately notify the Wilmington
District Engineer who will initiate the required State/Federal
coordination.
y. The permittee shall schedule a preconstruction meeting
between their representatives, the contractor representatives,
and the appropriate Corps of Engineers Project Manager prior to
any work within jurisdictional waters and wetlands to ensure that
their is a mutual understanding of all terms and conditions
contained within this Department of the Army permit. The
permittee shall notify the Corps of Engineers Project Manager a
minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of the scheduled meeting
in order to provide that individual with the opportunity to
. . . SENT BY:Wilmington District ;12-19-96 ; 15:95 ; USACE-Reg. Branch-4
schedule and participate in the required meeting.

919 739 99594 6
wSrATZ
?e r o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF T] ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C 27611-5201
September 13, 1996
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. Cliff Winefordner
Chief, Southern Section
Dear Sir:
-? ,1 e.
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRUARY
SUBJECT:. Richmond County: US 74 Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass from East of Pee
Dee River to East of SR 1615; T.I.P. No. R-0512; State Project No.
6.589001T, DOA Action ID No. 199301490
Reference the 404/401 permit application submitted November 29, 1995 for this
project. Attached herein is a drawing showing revisions in the wetland fill areas to be
involved in the interchange of US 74 with NC 177. Sites 36 and 37 have been added, and
the temporary impacts at Site 34 have been increased. This will increase the permanent fill
area on the R-0512D section of the project from 6.00 hectares to 6.10 hectares. The
impact area for the entire project will be 21.005 hectares. Revised summary tables for
R-0512D as well as the project summary table are included. Additionally, a summary
table listing the areas of mechanized clearing in wetlands beyond the construction limits is
included. A total of 3.053 hectares of mechanized clearing will be involved throughout
the project corridor. A new application form is also attached.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact
Ms. Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
Attachments
9

cc: Mr. F. E. Whitesell, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. Scott McLendon, COE, NCDOT Coordinator
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Thomas Welborn, EPA
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Archie Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design
r'
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
f33 CAR 3251 Expires October 1996
y ,c reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for teviewing instructions,
marching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
mrnents regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of InformationOperations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302: and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-00031, Washington, DC
20503. Ploase DO NO RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting,
navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the tfanspartation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application
for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be
processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 14. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
UTEhfS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPL/CANn!
5. APPLICANT'S NAME S. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE tonaWtisnotrmulred)
North Carolina Department of Transportation H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
PleRAiR

6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS @
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS -?
41 Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC, 27611
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W!AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. WIAREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
919-733-3141
b. Business b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
1 hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructional
Proposed construction of US 74 (Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass) from east of Pee Dee River to
US 74 east of SR 1615. A 4-lane divided highway; entails both fill and excavation in
13. NAME OF WATERBOOY, IF KNOWN «rapwicaoir
Pee Dee River
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Rutherford NC
COUNTY STATE
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS rirappicabw
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS,. IF KNOWN, is@*insstuctionsi
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
Permit application drawings include site maps for wetland impact sites.
_:41? O Activity (Oesuipfion o/ project, include sl! resrwssl
Construction of highway on new location.
19. Project Purpose [Desedho uw resson or purpose of rhs pro/ec4 see fnsauerrarw
Public transportation
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
Highway foundation .
21. Typeis) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
See permit application drawings and summary sheets.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled is"insrrucrionsi
Total fill in wetlands = 21.005 ha. Total excavation in wetlands = 0.759 ha.
Total fill below surface waters = 4.116 ha. Total temporary fill in wetlands = 0.688 ha.
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No _XX IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
See permit application drawings and property owner summary sheets.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ' DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood plain permits
26. Application ' hereby ma f a perm' or p its to authorize the work described in this application. 1 certify that the information in this
appli do omplete ccurat I fu r certify that 1 possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the
y on d agen a app c nt.'
y f3
SIGNATURE OF APP CANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
U.S.GPO: 1994-520-478182018
?a

?x
?Of 691 b1
a •
z _•
?3eao o m°
(6 t. u mm.
? m
. •n:m
cn l In
1X. ?r
%I
o ?i ?t ?1
C3
1 1 } ?1 co r
'?'r?,gOf.991
" NO t a -Y4-
s
C)
I ,
Q o
o m v ?--
u? Q
co
ri^ ?.
z1¢ ?-
V j Ul I
v ?
' Cf_.
Z
U-j ul
\ NORTH CAROLINA OCPAATMCNT Of TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.509001T (R-SI20)
'•) - PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET CYPAS5
FROM`0.6 Km YIEST OF SR 1992
I (n TO 0.6 Km EAST Of SR 1025
GQ+ (? I d1 j J ,SCALE AS SHOWN
?Nr-t r'I"71vw SHCCT `I8 OF ) 5G JULY 1005

FILL
SITE NO. STATION STRUCTURE FILL EXCAVATION below UNDERCUT TEMPORARY TOTAL
In in SURFACE in FILL FILL
WETLANDS WETLANDS WATER WETLANDS in WETLANDS In WETLANDS
(ha.) (ha.) (ha./cu.a) (cu.a) (ha./cu.a) (cu. 11)
a S 158+33-159+14 -L- 16 2.4x1.5 RCBC 0.80 0.025 0.505/5000 9650 0.0 63800
(o 3+40-4+41 RAMP C 750 RCP 0.22 0.0004 0.0 0.0 0.0 5500
;)'7 166+50-166+55 -L- 1500 RCP 2.15 0.03 0.035/170 9350 0.0 72300
a 8 171+83-172+36 -L- 450 RCP 0.40 0.0 0.0 3000 0.0 41000
a 9 172+59-174+90 -L- 1050, 750 RCP 1.07 0.0 0.0 5900 0.0 87600
3a 176+19-176+84 -L- 600 RCP 0.18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10500
3 1 177+75-179+93 -L- BRG. over Narks Cr. 0.97 0.09 0.072/360 20400 0.0 40800
3 2 7+25-7+81Lt -Y4- No Structure 0.02 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50
a3 8+01-8+47Rt -Y4- No Structure 0.03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 350
3Y 15+05-15+65Lt -Y4- 600 RCP 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0712524 7564
-35- 15+07-15+52Rt -Y4- 600 RCP 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2000
3G 8+03-8+71Lt -Y4-DET No Structure 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.02/93 93
3-7
----- 11+80-12+15-14B-
------------------ 1500 RCP
---------------- 0.10
---
- 0.0042 0.0 0.0 0.0 3500

TOTALS -
------
6.10 -----------
0.15 -----------
0.612/5530 ----------
48300 -------------
0.09/2617 -----------
335057
` This total Includes surface wat er areas delineated as wetlands.
NOTE: Site 131is below headwaters, al l other sit es are above headwaters.
0.16 ha. of wetlands drained.
' TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 6.10 ha. / 335057 cu.a
TOTAL EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS = 0.15 ha.
TOTAL FILL BELOW O.H.W. = 0.612 ha. / 5530 cu.a
TOTAL UNDERCUT IN WETLANDS = 48300 cu.a
TOTAL TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.09 ha. / 2617 cu.a
NORTH CAROLINA OCPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMONO COUNTY
0.500001T (R-5120)
PROPOSEO U.S. 74. ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1092
TO 0.G Km EAST OF SR 1025
t'
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ? OF 154 JULY 1905

SUMMARY
PROJECT FILL IN EXCAVATION FELL BELOW UNDERCUT TEMP. FILL
WETLANDS IN NETLANDS SURFACE WATER IN WETLANDS IN WETLANDS
(ha) (ha) (ha) (cu. m.) (ha)
R - 512A 2.840 0.254 0.920 ** -0-
* - 512B 2.840 0.014 0.953 ** 0.044
R - 512C 4.225 0.281 0.515 ** 0.380
R - 512D 6.100 0.150 0.612 48300 0.09
R - 512E 0.250 0.060 -0- 1050 -0-
R - 512F 4.750 - 0 - 1.116 37153 0.174
TOTALS * 21.005 0.759 4.116 0.6g8
Note: Site # 11 and 31 are Below Headwaters, all other sites are Above Headwaters.
See individual project summaries for more detailed information.
* This total includes surface water areas delineated as wetlands.
** Not available at this time.
Sheet 49 has been eliminated.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T R-512
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO U.S. 74 EAST OF
SR 1615.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ((;OF 156 OCTOBER 1995
r

Project Section SUMMARY
Mechanized Clearing
Beyond Construction Limits
R-512 A 0.152 ha
R-512 B 0.526 ha
R-512 C 0.570 ha
R-512 D 1.009 ha
R-512 E 0.003 ha
R-512 F 0.793 ha
TOTAL 3.053 ha

i
It •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
0! ; 451
Health and Natural Resources 4
T??A
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary [D E H N F1
Roger N. Schecter, Director
January 18, 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Inland "404" Coordinator
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199301490 dated
January 11, 1996 describing a proposed project by the NC DOT, is being circulated to interested
state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by February 9, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed Date
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
? •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 1 • •
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
E> C "? F1
Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary Roger N. Schecter, Director
January 18, 1996
MEMORANDUM------- - ------
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P. E.
Director
Division of nvironmental Management
v
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Inland "404" Coordinator
SUBJECT: "404" Project Review
The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 199301490 dated
January 11, 1996 describing a proposed project by the NC DOT, is being circulated to interested
state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by February 9, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please
contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY This office supports the project proposal.
No comment.
Comments on this project are attached.
This office objects to the project as proposed.
Signed
Date
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199301490 January 11, 1996
PUBLIC NOTICE
The NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS,
POST OFFICE BOX 25201, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, 27611-5201 has applied for a
Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN 20.9 HECTARES
(51.6 ACRES) OF JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS TO CONSTRUCT A BYPASS AROUND THE
CITIES OF ROCKINGHAM AND HAMLET, RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
This project was originally described in the Final Environmental Impact'
Statement issued on December 1, 1992. This document described the purpose and
need for the project and examined four 1,000 feet-wide Reasonable and
Feasible construction alternatives as well as the No-Action alternative. As a
result of this study, and after a corridor public hearing and agency review,
the preferred alternative was selected.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the
applicant and from observations made during site visits by a representative of
the Corps of Engineers. The North Carolina Department of transportation
(NCDOT) proposes to construct a 4-lane divided highway on a new location on
the south side of Rockingham and Hamlet in Richmond County, North Carolina.
The 16 mile, controlled access facility will cross Hitchcock Creek, Cape Fear
Branch, three tributaries to Solomons Creek, Solomons Creek proper, Marks
Creek, and Black Branch. Plans show a 18 meter (M)(60 foot) median throughout
the project length. Bridging of Hitchcock Creek and Marks Creek is proposed,
however, impacts to wetlands from approach fills total 0.52 hectares (ha) (1.3
ac.) and 0.96 ha. (2.4 ac.), respectively, at Hitchcock Creek and Marks Creek.
NCDOT has studied the feasibility of bridging two of the higher quality
wetland sites along the alignment. Site 21 at St. 111 + 00 on R-512C is
proposed to be culverted resulting in 0.48 ha. (1.19 ac) of fill material in
wetlands adjacent to Black Branch. The culvert will cost $261,000 to
construct while a bridge across all the wetlands would cost $1,368,000. Site
31 at St. 178 + 00 on R-512D will include a bridge over Marks Creek at a cost
of $1,137,600 and fill in 0.97 ha (2.4 ac) of wetlands. Construction of a
bridge long enough to cross all wetlands adjacent to Marks Creek would cost
$3,672,000. It is NCDOT's opinion that the increased cost for these two
bridges is not justified.
The majority of the wetland impacts are to three wetland community types:
1. Stream systems that have been impacted by beaver impoundments are
characterized by a large number of standing dead trees with an open water and
emergent marsh component.. The marsh component contains a diverse assemblage
of plants including seedbox (Ludwiaia alternifolia), button bush (Cephalanthus
occidentalis), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and various species of Polvaonum.
Remaining trees include sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash (Fraxinus
pennsvlvanica), river birch (Betula niara), and sweet gum (Liauidambar
stvraciflua). These areas are impounded for most, if not all of the growing
season and are associated with the unnamed tributaries to the Pee Dee River at
the extreme western end of the project near US 74 and with Hitchcock Creek
near Steeles Mill Pond.

-2-
2. Typical Bottom-land hardwood communities composed of cypress (Taxodium
distichum), tupelo (Nyssa aauatica), red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), and water oak (Quercus niara) are found at the
crossings at Marks Creek, Black Branch, and Solomons Creek. These areas are
generally associated with larger riparian corridors that have, in most cases,
been bisected with secondary roads. It should also be noted that the outfall
for the Hamlet waste water treatment plant discharges into Marks Creek
approximately three miles upstream of the proposed crossing location.
3. Streamhead pocosin communities were found along several unnamed
tributaries to Marks Creek near NC 177. These areas contain well defined,
perennial and intermittent stream systems with a dense shrub community
composed primarily of gallberry (Ilex coriacea), fetterbush (Leonia lucida),
titi (Cvrilla racemiflora), and Smilax. Canopy species consist primarily of
tulip poplar, and red Bay (Persea borbonia).
Although the sites described above are fairly undisturbed, many of the
smaller sites have been impacted by logging, or ditching and draining
activities and many contain small impoundments both up-stream and down-stream
of the proposed project.
For the purposes of design and construction, NCDOT has divided this
project into 6 segments:
-TIP R-512A is 1.61 miles long and extends from existing US 74 near the
Pee Dee River to 0.3 miles east of SR 1121.
-TIP R-512B is 2.56 miles long and extends from the terminus of R-512A to
0.8 miles west of SR 1103.
-TIP R-512C extends from the terminus of R-512B to 0.4 miles west of SR
1992.
-TIP R-512D is 3.05 miles long and extends from the terminus of R-512-C
to 0.4 miles east of SR 1825.
-TIP R-512E is 3.12 miles long and extends from the terminus of R-512D to
0.13 miles west of NC 381.
-TIP R-512F is 2.56 miles long and extends from the terminus of R-512E to
US 74 east of SR 1615.
A complete mitigation plan for this project has not been received as of
this date, however, NCDOT has retained the services of a private consultant to
develop a mitigation plan for a site to be located in the Yadkin River Basin.
The purpose of the work is provide a circumferential four-lane,
controlled access facility around Rockingham and Hamlet. This will reduce
congestion and improve safety along the existing route. Plans showing the
location of the work are included with this public notice. Detailed plan
sheets showing the location and extent of the work occurring in wetlands may
be examined in the Wilmington Regulatory Field Office of the Wilmington
District Corps of Engineers at 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina, 28402.
The State of North Carolina will.review this public notice to determine
the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No
Department of the Army (DA) permit will be issued until the coordinated State
viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor
will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental
-3-
Management (NCDEM) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality
Certificate as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the
comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to
consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with
particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the
National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered
properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and
this site is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for
inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes
the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and
he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown
archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or
destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that
the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity
and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable
impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a
careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular
case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the
proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The
decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which
it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the
general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern
for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which
may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general
environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values,
flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order
11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water
supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the
placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a
permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit
would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable
guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer
determines that it would be contrary to the public interest.
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal,
State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested
parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed
activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers
to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this
proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on
endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental
effects and the other public interest factors listed above.
-4-
4EPA;- Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and
to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA)
permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental
Management (NCDEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDEM considers whether or not the
proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the
Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department of
the Army (DA) permit serves as application to the NCDEM for certification.
. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be
reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), Salisbury Street,
Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be
furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean
Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM), 4401 Reedy Creek Road,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before February 9, 1996, Attention:
Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will
be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Scott McLendon, until 4:15 p.m.,
February 16, 1996, or telephone [phone].
z
U O
W p n
D Y Q
O Q
= W
n rt-
M
7.d.d
Z
D
O v '
VMS
I?f W
W
J
zm
O<
:::E S
Uu
O
?AA
v /
N
LO
ce
w
11018
N
.2
ZLS;-"d'
V J
S
T?
i 1
Y
O
I
N
e
n1o
1 Za
N E
p=

y =
? C v? ? -
a j? p
8
O

?
6 C
? ? N H
??f" ?W W
\ \ ?
W?

~ ?
P
?
?
e
N
n
J O
O
d
?

W M N
VI
r • •
Y n? N
OO N
O
f ?? Y
b F
r ?N pe

W
re ?i
? ?N
SNP,
W 8
0 8
0
? m N?n
JJ
V
N
\\
O
? h 0
f
6 \ W Z ?H ? O
f° fin
Y O
?
f
O r1 ,
N
v ?.

O N
ee
j

t a
a
HE
.
N W
NO
y r
y
NW \\ W
N
? N O
UDC
y
y??
p NN?

= WO
N •
O
h ••
°
h

? .1r
f
?¦

V
? p
N Cam,
NyWI
W ?S pN p N

'10>

N

?

O
T

pQ

S
O
p
p
N O
N 1yi. NP
W N W
S \\ W
N? P
N 0 v
0

e W
N s ?N
??
N
O
N p
O
f WO • •
7 ? CM
O
°
It
e
W
y5j.
C N .
>
e? V Cln S f? S O

? Qo\ N O
\ \ W a
N o
? f S Z
W1 N O_ O N ?
aV N
f ?. N ?
wd
WO 7
N to c
d?
c N
•
•
f M
V O N

W ?O Y
W ?. e

f ? WW? S
?OWN 1I?
N
W 8 O

nl
B
N. \ Y
\ yM
P ? O
N Y? Q
f Q
W 7 O p ^ O
y
N
W~

V
II I it I II II
¢ _

B
4

W
LL

?

z

ud ;
Y
Y
gg W
4 Q VI V S
a C
' W
v ? v
a
S u
f u
f ?
?
W =O
¢
do . °
V J dO
. u
g
\ . \
t s
N
? so
?
N o?o

N o
V V ? O I
L 6 d

f
•`
O O ?
R
V W f ?
i u
Z
?
o
u
F?
CC
? W
O
J N Q
d G Y y
j
J W W
C e W Q
ea Q N N
yWW V 1
Wrj
Ir
N
N
3 U
Q
?W
J
O?
W
N
Z
W
Q cc
W J
7O
V
as
Wd
Q Q
NN
OF
GN
W'•
2N
W
?- O
•W
z
a
WQ
a
Q.
'I
W
nX
.
N
Z
G
u
1 0 2
0 0s
"VlE
VICINITY MAP
Scale of Miles
0 S 10 20 30
silwmg?- !n
0 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T R-512
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO U.S. 74 EAST OF
SR 1615.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET , A OCTOBER 1995
Z ab ?8

IBEG
I d* W
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF STATE PROJECT 6.589001T
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0.5 0
KILOMETERS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT'.C',
I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74.ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1:2'
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF yarr SEPTEMBER. 1995
3 ??8
K Sit A
I

I

I
i
TOTALS 284 0.254 0.92
589M 2323300
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 284 hectares /232300 Cu. M.
TOTAL EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS = 0254 ha.
TOTAL FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER = 0.92 ha. / 56900 cu.m.
NOTE: ALL WETLAND SITES ARE ABOVE HEADWATERS
I
i
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.5890017 (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74. ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
i =ROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1121
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET OF SEPTEMBER '995 i

FILL
FILL EXCAVATION BELOW UNDERCUT TOTAL
SITE NO. STATION STRUCTURE IN IN SURFACE IN FILL IN
WETLANDS WETLANDS WATER WETLANDS WETLANDS
(ha.) (ha.) (hectares) (cu. M.) (cu, m.)
cu.m
-L1 16+50-16+63 1 @ 3.0 x 3.0 RCBC
LOOP C 12+11 -12+17
LOOP C 14~30 -1449 NO STRUCTURE
-L-1454-16+;x3 750 RCP
1 -L-17+54 -18+14 2 Q 27 x 21 RCBC 284 0.146 0.92 2323pp
-L-18+62 -18+67 900 RCP 56900
RAMP A 12+56-12+61 900 RCP
RAMP A 15+64 -16+33 2 C27 x 21 RCBC
2 -L- 21+85 -22+96 NO STRUCTURE 0 0.104 0 p
3 -L- 22+95 -23+05 NO STRUCTURE 0 0.004 0 0
•
• o? _ '` fie d ? ?) .`• e -. '
IZ&
0) OL
O r,{ ?? ?i ! Q Z ?
0,0
LL
M O
CL
F-
C) Li
7. < -j LLJ
77-
i - ?_? y y LL1 u z / LL O Z
CD CL
r -
O 0 z ...o
w J _ •? ? W
cf)
c
111 ?_ f s ? ... ? s _
i. I 4G +q . c
MOO
rr , N t f p t J J a
c u Y o;!- t ?? H s li T a Q
? ce 4 Y N y? • a V/
s. 11A 2 E - E
w ? ?^ Y
LLJ
V, V
LA-
14
Z 3:
Vl? {J ) V
• e
:AIM-•_
a N - sO? ?.
c
m
s

d?X
vS /'
n?
N j
i,
U !O°
w?
-I.O
C=
Z iN
CD cn
Ln

? fO \\
O
r-'o
U

CL. cc>

w(1) -
O
?

yJ
dJ
?

J?
?O

<

z o

S . < N
tP\? . .
Q
94 l O
??
N // LLJ

?J
N
J
t
i-
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHA14 -HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3W OF >f4

s
SITE PROJECT STATION STRUCTURE FILL IN
IN
WETLANDS
(ha) CUT IN
IN
WETLANDS
(ha) FILL BELOW
SURFACE
WATER
(ha./cu.m.) UNDERCUT
IN
WETLANDS
(cu. M.) TEMPORARY
FILL IN
WETLANDS
(ha./cu.m.) TOTAL
FILL IN
WETLANDS
(cu.m.)
4 27+40 -29+00 600 RCP 0.276 0.000 0.000 0.013 / 135 11200
5 32+30 - 33+45 450 RCP ; 0.698 0.000 0.000 0 38400
6 37+00 750 RCP 0.144 0.000 0.000 0.012/115 14900
7 3+65(ramp A)-5+13(ramp B 600 RCP 0.770 0.012 0.569/34100 0 95700
8 42+70 -L- 600, 75ORCP 0.350 0.002 0.000 0.010 / 125 25600
9 46+17 -L- NONE 0.003 0.000 0.000 0 400
10 59+80 -L- NONE 0.005 0.000 0.000 0 100
11 61+50, 62+50 -L- ITCHCK CK 0.527 0.000 0.384 / 1535 0 70100
12 65+20 -L- 600 RCP 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.009 / 140 6200
TOTAL I` 2.840 0.014 1 0.9531356351 0.044 / 515 262600
* This total includes surface water areas delineated as wetlands.
NOTE: SITE #11 IS BELOW HEADWATERS, ALL OTHER SITES ARE ABOVE HEADWATERS.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 2.8401262600 he. / cu.m.
TOTAL CUT IN WETLANDS = 0.014 he.
TOTAL FILL BELOW O.H.W. = 0.953 / 35635 he. / cu.m.
TOTAL UNDERCUT IN WETLANDS = cu. M.
TOTAL TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.044 / 515 he. / cu.m. -
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ? 0 F
- .'.i IV
\•
1
1tJCr Gx ut fu+c?U c'
,/ •. - ? 1 : ` / ? > .'?` Y.N. ,.•i x.57 `. ''
.7
a 4.A.
J 'IF7 u 1711 • '•.1
'??? ' I for + ? t 1 t ?e? ? -. ? `"• ' =a8i:+9
ROCKINGH
CN
'? ?i t2?t e: '•`? ••? c 107. 6.3
? ?I le.r6tne rrc.
1' 100 _ ? ?• •':?y:
?•:s l ?; /
1 CORDOVA
1 d ? --Ao«_" ?crw,? _ + t
l IC7 ' Y? S 1Ta 0 `1 / ,`•?= 'y ??
-- - _'_
t1r. mto ? :y
/•?? 1104 w « ` / 1: t 'J
10
1 1,1
Iles
C"cy
Azi
a1•' / lrrt ?? y....•1
I OL y T fie. f i C
Ir , ?Hal
tr,o roll
> ,r' {?-C16H' . 1111
\p clcwc
11 `71 cy,
+ Diggs b 0 Cmi CSt
1107 } '1 iMt
. \ 110, l ? .
Ca I h_t 1 1
• ? o,Ky 1
END- P
1101 ( ( ` 1.J
00..E l!1_. (?(> 1 ? 1.0. t ../ tt_S '? •
c ['?1 r U f.4 r •'- , \ '=' lio. 1a00 Jj`? !.o ,c__,
\• r=e 1.S
?; "??t.?^ l J X11 ?, - r :203
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY MAP RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET >< OF AUGUST , 1995
8 b k8

•
N
N Z
O
LLJ Q
Q
Ln
V) _
F-
N p m
CL V) Ln
N>-,>-

:N Z Q F- X W (n
Q?:,- Z J=)
(1J M =)0-M 0
F- N 0=Q
LL-
r)
?
(n L IJ
F- • O O LL p c
:
0Z

(n N
L
J Lr)=
F-
:2 W Z O
W
1
F"' O O
?-tnUUF- 2

V) U
LLJ C)
_ W
N

V' m
CL
LLI CL
~
W p
N

(80/1
WSJ O
bl
H y
d2?? _ 01 i F-- o
R
Q N
Lit U =
I- Oil
J W
Q
LLJ N

lil V) Jy L LJ -
F- ?R}- L1J
(? N F-
.M
W

,in Ln
LLJ
F-

N ?P
O\,O Gav
?
A ?S `lam

o I .
?
J
m O

W m
Q

a
O
O
W
O
m
W
O
W
O
W
O
W
O
W
O

O

O

o a
i
i
a m
< m
< co
< co
< co
< m
a m
a
co
z?
u
U

5 I
p

N
U^ N N m O
f tff O O

f.- O

C4 O p O O
cy U1
P_
J
~ N 10
° f
O M
f N
f N ?
m U O
in wi
w pi

O
H m in M Of
Y
K
a° ° n °o f rmn
W O O ° ° °
N
W
U
r W
Q O O
In `
C4 0
N N N
O N
Q_ ? O O O O
O O
O
O N
O

J
04
4 N #_

ai rn

to

C

^ C4

m

O

O

Q

h

i

p

C

O

O

O

M
C

O

O

C N

C

f

O

M

O

Of

O

N

G
l
N

v
C/) v
N
N 0 O 40
* ± + m
~ cm N
+
N N w
A N
r
f
r
~
< t < M O

an
H t H Of < O < O
H to O
O f t p
< M < 1? O f

+
<
ao < O
go m M
< f Of
O
<° M
+ O
'n
° t0
+ M
2, M f'
N+ f
O
+ m
N f +0
Of
N
to
?N tor.
cc ?m w t+f yln M
? N?
O)
Cc* nN

f

< O $

<
N
f

N O <

W
>i- f
?O
O O
O p
W O O
W
p <
y
0 <
yO < M
WO F
O
K W a a O C ?
-
m
J
J M
- i
J J Q } O K K J J J J J J
r? tt in
- ?D n ap Q1 O N M v
"' - - - N N N N N
N. C. DEPT. OF RAN P R ATI N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SUMMARY REPORT RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 T (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET >< OF
,AUGUST
1995
,
,
10 b k8
•

•
oO kN?x .
tale ?? MarzAnlle
WMIC Si
!? 1
t
J.
l.n.rsnrl j

JV
Q?1006 ROCKINGHAM
l
CSx 1
9 v+ 74 /
^ DOB INS
1109 ^??
I Csx L HEIGHTS /
J
c
'
1106
2n62
logs ` ?SIH PP1. POIN'
1705
soaet,? Cfrd 11AMLET
A
.77 /
'
1 ,?
??,
\ 138
X001
?° /? 1912
GIN PROJECT
\q9? ND PR IECT t
? fps r0 v a i
Vr• o s moo,
1
1O9J
1996 1826 39 tep5
U
Q
$ .a° afi
1

VICINITY NAP SHOWING LOCATION OF STATE PROJECT 6.589001T

??p t iar¢R 1 R
F?II• r
mil ( LaR. r
'?1?, , .desr:lfa
Da?? 1
S U O Ne Oe a??.
trs 1 ce",
Morvt /
1, ? yr
1 McF arpn
i
+sl' I 11 IL
APPROXIMATE AR
OWN BELOVJilee?
? Cheraw
tlt ?
?'' H 0 K
APPROXIMATE SALE
-now
O 5 10
KI LOMETEA5
NORTH CAROLINA OLPARTUENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DiVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.300601T iR-312J) .
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROC:INGHAtL KAMLCT CYPA"
FROM Q. G Kim VIEST OF SR 1002
TO 0.6 Kit. EAST OF OR 1025
SGALE Ao SHOWN
CHCCT XOF JULY 1203
Scale of miles
0 5 10 20 30
0 10 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
One DKh equal! Apprw ,1ely 13 miles ar10 aPIN-. alNy 21 kibmelen.
m
-m
om
U +
7 to
Z¢
la?gl
0 in
z 5 Za-
W I -

° 00.0
N
Y 0
m

U 0

O?O
V ` U W
`
V
U
W
-l3
m ?
}
/

F-•
O U)

OC7 ee6 ? y
l
??
a
O N
z' I bO
? •?
9 '

o
? m
m
U m
?
• ? m
N
N 0-
O
U Q
'
• z N
> n O F
/ m .

J
I'
)
W

0040V t r Q

LL-
•

z m
m
Q

+
N j
I-.
O
O
.u >
z w
W
> `
m

W
m
00•SEI
O
N
? ::OATH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or TRA NSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
O R I CHV.GNO COUNTY
O f- m
In X
0

r + t\I
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM, HAw1 rET ZYPASS

In Z
u c -f= LLB FROM 0.6 Km P1EST OF SR 1902
TO O. G K01 EAST OF SR 1025
Z In ^M Q
?
W
co WJ
m ZW
SCALE AS SHOWN

- 0
F-
SHEET K OF_?K
JULY 1005
- _ _ b91 ' b1s
CV o m
U m.
O: m
r
N to
Z
0 <L
O 0 U
N
4-
w
r
" a NC 177
IA
ro
m
m >- o CV
cr co
to IM
U to
z > 004.091
LLJ Q- o
uj
J
oo}SS! 7
\ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
R.CHMONO COUNTY -
0.5c9aa?1T cR-51201
/Nt
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCY,INGHAM HAWILET CYPASZ
- FRO.; 0.6 Kr WEST OF SR 1902
1 (n TO 0.6 Km EAST OF SR 1025
'?-OOf 1r, r _ SCALE AS SHOWN
??' ?NI, r?71vW SHEET- OF .>'r" jULY 1995
t3 [) xs;

M

I
00. ,

m
m
m
l0
I.-
U Z
-Wi O U)
O utno m
d + m N
W I-@ r?
F In ^ co v
G ¢ Lo
V) UN(4 1
Z Z , uu)
W W J Z w
a
-V \ X
V
Q 0
Q
N
0
0
0
SIR 18-25 -%(6-
AIRPORT ROAD
NORTH CARO.INA DCPARTMEN- OF TA:.N.SPGRTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
G.509001T (A-312D)
PROPOSED U.S. 76, ROCK INGHAM. HA;4LET CYPA-.FRO14 6.6 K.1 WEST OF SR 1092
TO 0.6 Nat EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOWN
15&
SHEET OF JULY 1993
o?
~i
2 ?
O
vI
z°`•
•W
Lr-
N LL-i

Lq in
W

.i?

.

C p

U of o
0- cr Do
~ L? M

-T- En Z
tom.
Q
-Z6
? L&J
- o f "
_ - ,• ,, - U O :2 3

M to
= 00
0

?• = '
*: CO C)
_
Y
Z -
Q > Z o_
SQ. _:
_. O Q Z Y N
_
y
J C) 0
o:
,._ e
? ?..
-
1 • ? O Z o^

' _ , 4-2
S.

?
?
/
?
t
/
? _...
.?_?'
r I
?•-
' i
om,
- - ? -
:7?r '? (> of t? i•, ? =e - ? - ?) '/?
` a ?
i c ??,' !-'...0 . o t
`'? •' ??•'
`? ••, = Q

1-9 E
Lij

19t r Z -
C
U ?. _ •? ~ _
lyr •; rz -
V Mr
O
-
j
I ` •Z ?1 5.. •.? ??
- O
. -
/ r e
//? o f , ? R f
i
-
a -
SHEET D9 Or 3
15 b 18
10 J.?qo 3 17.
_OP
s?
!Ail
'fib.. , l 'ec• ?b ?: - /7 of
°'Z• ' ?? ? 177 `i?)•? ? .e IJ ? ':? ?1# 1)/? I
i X47 ? 1?' ? / v 7 !}Al '?• ) < ?? /'
1-0
HAML
ro'.. 77o
row. ^ I•.. ^ u •, JS7 _ •.?•• ]n 4 / '?
• ?• / ' 1 .!
too#
SITE -°
33
1.0
1071` a?? VICINITY MAP
16 361 ? ^
, !m FROM NCDOT COUNTY MAP
OF RICHMOND COUNTY
,? 'tea .; i, •' -SIT 4 2
- '" SI TE 41
' .,?•L? SITE 40
:b SITE 39 _ l,?cL.
' • ? • • "? • M Nis / (??.:/ .. ?' ` ? 7 L, .,l _, .
'GOa• ig
Gern
.? i`\ . •-; r•?. - Q 1?:ors i/?- _l 1 '? . \ - `.
.? ,?. M, _• pate
^- ; I VICINITY MAP
FROM U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAPS
0 0.5 1 km
.1o°
O°,I' y
't7E. ?1;1 ,?
?1•e
SCALE 1:400
•
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 T
PROPOSED
U.S. HWY. 74 BYPASS
SHEET ? OF T I

f
+ a r

3
O
J
O
m O
m O O
m O

o m m
m
Q
Q? N
CA M to N
H

° M
o N n N
( d
? L
r
o:
Q

0

0

00
0

(0
0

0
°

0

r
CL o 0
o 0 0 0 0 0
k'
Zn
I.- Z
U 0
H
W O O e7

N O
V7 PI)
F- Q
0'
N co
n O
0
^

Z Q M
)

a =) U

W
LLJ

Q LLI
Z V
U')
U7
v

N

t0
JW CA
O O O O
0 O O O O
N
(n
?Z
Q 0
N N
OD n
(O 00
U7 O
C14 O
L7
-J -C
LL.
cV cli
O
O
O
O

?a
o: }
0
-
O O? O OJ O? O? O?

Q ?OaO ONON
to M? (?
N a)
(0 Op O)
C) o ?O
OD O
1- +
+00 +? M+
+pw ?.+ +^ +? +
O
O M
N
N p N

N N
to
N
N tn

N
N N
r=1 Of
? O
d
d N
d It ff)
d
z
O
_
F-- (/)
Q V)
° Q
ZC)O a)
00 ?m
Q=o
Of to Ln
° II
?o
oz
a
0
oo= w =
a o
t_n _U
W ? cr O
Qf

U
Z
~
w
w
2

SUMMARY
PROJECT FILL IN EXCAVATION FILL BELOW UNDERCUT TEMP
FILL
WETLANDS IN NETLANDS SURFACE WATER IN WETLANDS .
IN WETLANDS
(ha) (ha) (ha) (cu. M.)
(ha)
R - 512A 2.840 0.254 0.920 ** -0-
R - 512B 2.840 0.014 0.953 ** 0.044
R - 512C 4.225 0.281 0.515 ** 0.380
R - 512D 6.000 0.150 0.612 48300 0.140
R - 512E 0.250 0.060 -0- 1050 -0-
R - 512F 4.750 -0- 1.116 37153 0.174
TOTALS * 20.905 0.759 4.116
Note: Site # 11 and 31 are Below Headwaters, all other sites are Above Headwaters.
See individual project summaries for more detailed information.
* This total includes surface water areas delineated as wetlands.
** Not available at this time.
Sheet 49 has been eliminated.
0.738
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.59900I T R-512
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO U.S. 74 EAST OF
SR 1615.
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET &GOFt5g?_. OCTOBER 1995
1abU8
i
?c
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 199301490
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Questions or comments may be addressed to me at [phone].
Sincerely,
1
Sco t Mclendon I
Regulatory Project Manager
ft -
Z n
..+ L
t y a° m
C
C-)
I
Dear Mr. Dorney:
?p

It is our understanding that you have been provided a copy of the
application of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for
Department of the Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality
Certification to place fill material in 20.9 hectares (51.6 acres) of wetlands
to construct a bypass around the Cities of Rockingham and Hamlet, Richmond
County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance
of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii)
of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality
certification is required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law.
A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification
has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days
after receipt of'a request for certification is a reasonable time for State
action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request, or asked for an
extension of time, by March 11, 1996, the District Engineer will deem that
waiver has occurred.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
January 11, 1996
Printed on ® Recycled Paper
SENT BY:Wilmington District

; 4-29-95 ; 1440 ; USACE-Reg. Branch-# 819 375 58234 3
SUBJECT: Roekingharnftwrfet Bypass, Richmond County, North Carolina (TIP R-5 12);
ACTION ID NO. 199301490
PURPOSE., Provide Status of Subject Project
FACTS: Final Environmental Impact Statement issued February, 1992. For design and
construction purposes, project divided into 6 segments. Application received December 4, 1995,
detailing fill in 51.6 acres of wetlands to construct proposed project. Public Notice published
January 11, 1996. Received comments from National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and US
Environmental Protection agency (USEPA) on January 21 and January 26, respectively. NMFS
had no objections to the proposed project; USEPA requested that permit not be issued until a
final mitigation plan had been reviewed and approved..
Letter to NCDOT on February 26, 1996 requesting further information regarding several,
crossing structures, relocations of service roads, and alignment location. Have scheduled
meetings with NCDOT to discuss 404(b)1 issues and to discuss proposed mitigation sites on
Long Swamp and Lumber River.
PREPARED BY: Scott McLendon [phone]
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
DAVE: 29 April 1996
REVIEWED BY, Cliff Winefordner [phone]
Chief, South Section
Regulatory Branch
DATE: 29 April 1996
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
S?
Dr. G. Wayne Wright
Corps of Engineers
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Dear Dr. Wright:
May 9, 1996
ID F== F1
In keeping with your request, this office has circulated to interested state review agencies
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice and Action ID No. 199301490 dated January 11,
1996 which describes a highway improvements project by the N. C. Department of
Transportation, Division of Highways of Raleigh. The project, known as the Rockingham-
Hamlet By-Pass designed on a new alignment and involving various stream and wetland
crossings, would impact some 52 acres of this habitat. The project is sited west of Rockingham
in Richmond County.
According to the writer's most recent information from a lead review agency, this
proposal is in a hold status and the most recent review of proposed mitigation was found
unacceptable.
With nine of the ten cooperating agencies submitting final or at least interim comments,
the following is offered for your records. Two of the referenced agencies submitted substantive
comments to date as follows:
Division of Environmental Management - in a 17, 1996 memorandum from D.O.T.
described the severe impacts associated with the project and stated that D.E.M. did not
endorse the 1993 FEIS;
Division of Archives and History - in a joint memorandum dated 28, 1996 reported that
an agreed to archaeological survey had not been submitted;
Wildlife Resources Commission - final comments have not been submitted due to
overall status of review.
P. O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Dr. G. Wayne Wright
Page 2
May 9, 1996
This interim report is submitted for your records. Key review agencies will be submitting
additional information as the review continues.
Very sincerely,
Jo R. Parker, Jr.
Inland `404 Coordinator
JRP:jr/aw /
cc: Division of Environmental Management/
Wildlife Resources commission--Raleigh
Archives & History--Raleigh
V , RATING, WORKSHEET Fouro Version
Project na e_ Nearest road
County Wet] nd area acres Wetland width feet
Name of evaluat r )ateK
Wetland ' Iocadon Adjacent laud use
(witlllz 112 -mile upstream, ui)slvae,
[? i1Zl ?i?( ,Ux lake or radlu9)
onerenia1 sti ear
?_ forested/natui al veg(?tatlon °o
pry ?nte??uitta?It St1'??z17
=ith,A7 agriculture, urban/suburban 2°0
L impervious surface __211,6
h
')ominant vegetation
4 soll Series
(2)
I r .._
predominantly ,prg3 -rk - hoi-Ties,
tnuc't,' or peat}`
PI niinerr,l - nail' sandy
LJ predominantly sandy Flooding and wetriess
[ semipermanently 'to pernianentiy
flooded or inundated
?ivdrattl_ic fa=_'t01""', " seasonally flooded or inundated
LJ steep, topography interrnittantly flooded or temporary
ditched or chanreielized surface water
total.'wetland width rt g feet o no evidence of flooding or sLirface
water
Wetland type (select one)*
ottomland hardwood forest CSI Pine savanna
El Headwater forest E] Freshwater marsh
E1 Swamp forest El Bog/fen s
? Wet flat EJ Ephemeral wetland
0 Pocosin ® Carolina Bay
0 Bog forest [] Other
*The rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
r n weight -
IN Water storage x 4.00 Q
? Wetland Score
G=?1 Bank/Shoreline stabilization - x 4.00 = jZ
!
Pollutant removal* x 5.00 - r
Wildlife habitat x 2.00 = Q -
' Aquatic life value x 4.00 =
Recreation/Education .?_ x 1.00
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and > 10% nonpoint disturbance within 1 /2 mile upstream, upslope, or radius
J./iirJrl'!irlliiriiirlrlirrrrrirrrrrrrrrlrrr..rrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrsrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrJrrrrrrrrrrrlrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr;l.rrr//
r, 7

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
September 27, 1995
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
NCDEHNR - Division of Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
SUBJECT: On-site Field Review of Wetland Sites for US 74 From East of NC 41
Near Lumberton to US 76 Near Chadbourn, Federal Aid Project No.
NHF-74(7), State Project No. 8.T4611801, TIP No. R-2558
An on-site field review for the above subject project is scheduled for
Monday, October 30, 1995, at 9:30 AM. You and/or other appropriate members
of your staff are requested to meet at this time at the Boardman boat access
area located in the northwest quadrant of the US 74 crossing of the Lumber
River.
The purpose of this field review is to give resource agencies an
opportunity to look at the entire project and determine where areas of high
quality wetlands are located. Resource agencies will also have an
opportunity to make recommendations on locations where they would like to see
the median width reduced.
If you have any questions concerning this field review or if you need
additional information, please contact Mr. Ron Elmore, Project Planning
Engineer, at [phone], Extension 229, or Ms. Cyndi Bell, Permits and
Mitigation Unit, at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerely,
? alaxL.'? ??4r
t H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/rfm
cc: Mr. Eric Galamb

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO Mav 3, 1993
Regulatory Branch
Action ID. 199301490
Mr. L.J. Ward, P.E.
Planning and Research Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department
of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Ward:
Reference the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the US 74
Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass in Richmond, County, North Carolina, from US 74 0.5
miles east of the Pee Dee River, south of the cities of Rockingham and Hmalet,
to US 74 1.5 miles west of the Scotland County line (State Project # 6.589001T
[R-512]).
Our review of the matrix evaluation of reasonable and feasible
alternatives for this project indicates that there are no significant
differences between the preferred and other alternatives for this project in
the areas of construction costs, relocations, wetland and other natural
resource impacts. Design considerations should further reduce all impacts to
a minimum. On this basis, we concur with your preferred alternative selection
as being the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative.
We anticipate processing an individual Department of the Army permit
application for this project. When plans are finalized, a verification of the
wetland limits will be conducted by Mr. Scott McLendon of this office. Please
advise when you are ready to proceed.
Questions should be referred to Mr. McLendon at telephone [phone].
Sincerely yours,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Branch
'M 5N
,+S ir'RS` U`3
-2-
Copies Furnished:
Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency - Region IV
Wetlands Regulatory Unit
345 Courtland Street, NE.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Regional Director
National Marine Fisheries Ser•ri?es,
NOAA
Duval Building
9450 Koger Boulevard
Saint Petersburg, Florida 33702.
State Property Section
North Carolina Department of
Administration
116 West Jones Street
Rleigh, North Carolina 27603
IM/r". John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Environmental Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. David Yow
North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission
Post Office Box 118
Nnrthside, North Carolina 27564
NOTICE OF A ROADWAY CORRIDOR OFFICIAL MAP ACT
AND A DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED
US 74 BYPASS OF HAMLET AND ROCKINGHAM
Project 6.589001T R-512 Richmond County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the
above public hearing on February 25, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in the
Fairview Heights Elementary School Auditorium, 104 Hamilton
Avenue, Hamlet.
The hearing will consist of an explanation of the proposed
design, right of way requirements and procedures, relocation
advisory assistance, and Roadway Corridor Officipl Map Act. The
hearing will be open to those present for statements, questions,
comments and/or submittal of material pertaining to the proposed
project. Additional material may be submitted for a period of ten
days from the date of the hearing to: W. A. Garrett, Jr., P.E.,
P.O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611.
The proposed design is a four lane divided roadway on new
location. The right of way required will be 300' minimum. Access
will be fully controlled. Drivers may enter or exit at
interchanges only.
A map setting forth the location and design and copies of the
State Environmental Impact Statement are available for public
review at the NCDOT District Office, 517 South Hancock Street,
Rockingham. A map is also posted at the Richmond County
Courthouse.
Anyone desiring additional information regarding the public
hearing may contact Mr. Garrett at the above address or telephone
919/250-4092.
NCDOT will provide reasonable accommodations, auxiliary aids,
and services for any qualified disabled person interested in
attending the public hearing. To request the above you may call
Mr. Garrett at the above number no later than seven days prior to
the date of the hearing.
JAN 2 9 1993
NC fal,,?GL - on,-Hey

United States Department of the Interior -
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
November 21, 1996
Lieutenant Colonel Terry R. Youngbluth
District Engineer, Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 24802-1890
Attention: Scott McLendon
Dear Colonel Youngbluth:
n
996
v
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the September 13, 1996
letter from Mr. H. Frank Vick of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) to Mr. Cliff Winefordner of your staff. NCDOT is requesting a
modification to their § 404 permit application (Action I.D. No. 199301490)
associated with the U.S. 74 Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass (T.I.P. No. R-0512). The
proposed activities will impact Federal jurisdictional wetlands at three
locations/magnitudes not included in the original application. About 0.25 acres
(0.1 hectare) of wetlands will be permanently filled by the additional impacts.
Finally, the applicant acknowledges that 7.6 acres (3.05 hectares) of forested
wetland habitat will be inalterably destroyed by mechanized landclearing for the
proposed activities.
This is the report of the Service submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with,
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 884, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
The Service has no objection to the modifications described. We recommend that
the filled areas be culverted to maintain the hydraulic continuity (and
ecological integrity) of the impacted wetlands. Further, we believe the adverse
impacts associated with mechanized landclearing are cumulatively severe, and
should be mitigated at a ratio exceeding five (mitigation acres) to one (impacted
acres). Finally, we reiterate our August 9, 1996 conclusion that the proposed
mitigation plan for this project (pre-modification) was "an acceptable approach."
The location, extent, or management of the proposed mitigation site has yet to
be determined.
Typically, hydraulic continuity and ecological integrity (including attendant
biogeochemical functions and ecological utility) can be accomplished by
installing appropriately sized culverts. In some cases, ambient light sources
may need to be provided inside the culverts. Unlit culverts may dissuade fauna
from utilizing the structures as passageways. Lacking safe and effective
passage, populations of organisms which require spatial heterogeneity to complete
their life history or otherwise move about (for either density dependant or
independent reasons) may become fragmented, isolated, depleted, or inbred.

! M
Crossing the new roadway is unsafe and may not be feasible for small amphibians
or soil macrofauna.
Maintaining hydraulic continuity is also important for flood control, vegetation
structure, and soil nutrient assimilation/transformation processes. The loss of
hydraulic continuity and the lack of a safe and effective passage route for local
fauna is untenable. The proposed activities should be designed to ensure that
properly sized and located culverts or bridges are installed in the road
crossings.
Mechanized landclearing is a loss of fish and wildlife resource habitat, both
onsite and at the landscape scale. This type of activity results in the complete
degradation of habitat form, function, and structure in the cleared area.
Mitigation is unlikely to replace the lost ecological assets for decades or more.
We recommend the mitigation acreage for the mechanically cleared area exceed five
to one (5:1). Once the other mitigation issues have been resolved, fifty acres
of restored (or 80 acres of preserved) habitat should be added to the plan as
mitigation for landclearing activities.
Finally, the Service remains convinced that the mitigation plan should be
finalized and approved by the stakeholders prior to permit issuance.
We appreciate the opportunity to review this request. If you have any comments
or questions, please call Kevin Moody of my staff at [phone] extension 19.
Sincerely,
ohn M. He er
Field Supervisor
CC: NCDOT, Raleigh, NC (Frank Vick, Cyndi Bell)
NCDWQ, Raleigh, NC (John Dorney)
NCWRC, Raleigh, NC (David Cox)
EPA, Wetlands Regulatory Program, Atlanta, GA (Thomas Welborn)
NMFS, Beaufort, NC (Larry Hardy)
FWS/R4:KMoody:KM/11/21/96:919/856-4520 ext.19:B:\KM-97013
??,x STATF q,
miser
QuwM
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
November 6, 1996
Mr. Eric E. Galamb
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Galamb:
Re: Rockingham-Hamlet US 74 Bypass
TIP Project No. R-512
It is my understanding that you are concerned that the wetland impacts at the crossing of the
proposed project at Marks Creek will not be adequately mitigated at the proposed Long Swamp
mitigation site. As you know, in addition to the Long Swamp site in Hoke County, we have been
investigating the Gibson Pond mitigation site in Richmond County, where you have indicated that
suitable replacement functions (for the Marks Creek crossing) are present.
The current status of the Gibson Pond site is that the three parcels comprising the site are
currently being appraised by the Department of Transportation's Right of Way Branch. Once the
appraisals have been received and boundary surveys have been completed, the Right of Way Branch
will be in a position to make offers to the owners of the three parcels. If purchase agreements can be
reached with the owners, then it is our intention to offer sufficient mitigation from both Gibson Pond
and Long Swamp to mitigate for the impacts of the Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass. I anticipate that
the Long Swamp credits will be used up for the impacts associated with R-512 except for the Marks
Creek crossing, and that credits at Gibson Pond will be available to adequately mitigate for the
impacts associated with the Marks Creek crossing.
Sincerely,
k
m
David C. Robinson, Ph.D., P.E.
Permits and Wetland Mitigation Unit Head
Planning and Environmental Branch T.t
'Yczr
9
o? fr 1??''I:e Sy
4•pf??'?.
DEPARTMENT OF TMNSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR.
GOVENNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
June 17, 1996
Regulatory Branch
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Attention: Mr. Wayne Wright
Subject: Richmond County, US 74 Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass from
East of Pee Dee River to East of SR 1615, TIP No. R-512
State Project No. 6.589001T
Dear Mr. Wright:
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
J/

oN,yIN(
t? 164q
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) submitted an individual permit
request for the subject project on November 29, 1995. Subsequently, the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and N.C. Division of Environmental
Management have requested additional information in order to continue processing of this
permit. Our responses to their letters are listed below.
I? Army Corps of Engineers, February 26 1996
1. Sheet 97 of 156: It appears that Stokes Road (SR 1992) will be relocated as part of
this project. Were impacts to wetlands (if any) associated with this relocation
considered in the application?
Response: Impacts to wetlands in the vicinity of Stokes Road were considered during
the planning and preliminary design stages of this project. The line was shifted in
order to avoid wetlands. There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the construction
limits.

Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 2
2. Impacts to the large wetland system on the extreme western end of the project will
total approximately 10 acres. This area was apparently not noted during the
preliminary planning for this project. NCDOT should address the feasibility of
shifting the western terminus to avoid this impact.
Response: This wetland system was identified in the Environmental Impact
Statement (Section 3.5.2 and Figure 3.9). The corridor selected represents efforts to
minimize impacts to wetlands as well as other environmental and socioeconomic
factors. Due to the width of the system within the footprint of the western terminus,
the alignment cannot be shifted out of this site without significantly altering the
project design. The specific area of the western terminus is restricted due to measures
taken to avoid a church, cemetery, and wetlands associated with Hitchcock' Creek.
3. Sheet 26 of 156: It appears that SR 1119, SR 1109, SR 1117, and SR 1118 will be at
least partially relocated for construction of an interchange. Were impacts to wetlands
(if any), associated with these relocations considered in the application?
Response: These secondary roads will be partially relocated in order to accommodate
the Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass. The wetland impacts associated with these
relocations are included in the permit application. Sheet 26 of the permit drawings
shows the overall relocation plan for these roads. Please note the wetland impacts in
this vicinity occur within the project mainline and ramps.
4. As discussed in the application, NCDOT does not feel that bridging the entire wetland
crossing at Marks Creek (St. 178+00) at a cost of $3,672,000 is justified. While we
agree that this is a significant cost, it is our position the wetlands at this site are of
high quality and provide significant water quality and habitat functions. It is also
recommended that NCDOT widen the bridge opening to maintain a portion of the
floodplain and to alleviate the need for the proposed channel change.
Response: NCDOT maintains that the existing bridge design at Marks Creek (Sheets
113 and 114) will maintain hydraulic flow through the area. The channel change is of
minor significance, as it will include only the shaded portion of the creek flowing
under the bridge. The roadway will be located roughly perpendicular to Marks Creek,
so the stream impacts were minimized to the extent practicable. To span the wetlands
will save 0.97 hectare (2.4 acre). This wetland system was identified in the
Environmental Impact Statement (Section 3.5.2 and Figure 3.9). The corridor
selected represents efforts to minimize impacts to wetlands as well as other {
environmental and socioeconomic factors. Diie"tti-theMdt'h''of1hetyst -,within thb
fopnt; of the western terminus, tb; alignment canrtot bey shifted"tzt of this site
witlYOt 9signifgcantly `altering the project design. 'The specific area of the western
terminus is restricted because if the proposed interchange take off point is shifted
V, jj"*
?? C61 .
Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 3
west, replacement of the two existing structures over the Pee Dee River would be
required, costing more than $10 million, additional wetland takings, major utility
relocation, and added mileage to the project length. NCDOT maintains the cost of
widening the bridge through this area does not constitute a reasonable alternative.
A shift to the east would most likely replace Zion Church, and the congregational
cemetery, which is highly regarded by local citizens as a landmark and a structure of
culture, age, and religious importance. In addition, substantial wetland and floodplain
are associated with Hitchcock Creek and would require crossing more waterways than
the preferred corridor.
This area would also be much less desirable and practical (geometrically) to design
and construct an interchange.
5. At Site 39 on the "F" section (St. 23+600): It is unclear why the entire wetland area
between the "L" line and ramp D will be filled. Please justify why this is being done.
Response: Reference Sheets 129 to 141 of the permit drawings. Impacts at wetland
Site 39 are influenced by the railroad tracks to the west of this interchange. The
elevation of the interchange configuration will need to be high enough to provide
clearance over the railroad while also allowing for the ramps. This will necessarily
widen the fill slopes within the ramps, thereby impacting the wetland. The
embankment will be elevated so high that the slopes from the loop, ramp and
centerline will intersect before meeting natural ground. There is no practicable
alternative to the existing design.
6. At Site 23 on "C" section (St. 126+60); NCDOT should examine the feasibility of
constructing a 100' bridge opening vis-a-vis the cost of the proposed 3-cell box
culvert. As you are aware, this project will cross several, relatively unfragmented
riparian corridors. These stream corridors provide a number of benefits to receiving
waters including the attenuation and desynchronization of flood events,
improvements to water quality in downstream receiving waters, and the uptake and
transformation of many biologically active compounds. In addition, these areas
provide valuable wildlife habitat and travel corridors for a variety of birds, mammals,
amphibians, and reptiles; and,
7. At Site 21 on the "C" section (St. 111+00): NCDOT should explore the feasibility of
constructing a 100' bridge opening vis-a-vis the cost of the currently proposed 3-cell
box culvert. In addition, it is also requested that NCDOT explore the feasibility of
spacing the 3 culverts at equal intervals across the existing floodway of Black Branch
Creek.
Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 4
Re=on NCDOT examined the feasibility of constructing bridges at the referenced
locations. The crossing at Hitchcock Creek would require a 200-foot bridge, half of
which would be placed on uplands, at a cost in excess of $1,000,000. This would
reduce wetland impacts by 0.8 acres. Black Branch Creek runs perpendicular to the
project corridor, and is therefore impossible to avoid crossing. To space 3 box
culverts at equal intervals will not provide the hydraulic adequacy needed; therefore,
the location of these culverts needs to remain. If needed, equalizer pipes could be
placed in the wetlands. The cost of a bridge at this location wou excee 1,500,000
versus $300,000 for a box culvert, in order to reduce wetland impacts by 0.8 acre.
NCDOT considers the costs of these bridges to be excessive for a minor reduction in
wetland impacts; therefore, re-design of the proposed culvert designs is not
warranted.
N.C. Division of Environmental Management January 17.1996-
Comment: DEM policy which follows the 404(b)(1) guidelines requires DOT to
investigate avoidance options before minimization efforts are undertaken. Please
discuss actions DOT took in this regard. Specifically, DEM requests that DOT
restudy the termini and attempt to relocate them out of wetlands.
Response: NCDOT maintains that the selected corridor represents our best efforts to
minimize effects on natural, cultural and socio-economic features of the project area.
Wetlands were avoided to the extent practicable with respect to the surrounding
community. The western terminus location is restricted by a church, cemetery and
wetlands. The area selected for the eastern terminus is the only area providing
equalization with the existing roadway. It provides the largest undeveloped area for
placement of a suitable interchange design. Furthermore, shifting the eastern
terminus in either direction would impact wetlands. See also response to DOA
comment #2 above.
Comment: The wetland impacts associated with the interchange near the Pee Dee
River is 2.8 hectares (6.92 acres). The wetland is a large bottomland hardwood
system that is performing significant water quality functions. This interchange will
also require 160 meters of stream relocation. If the interchange cannot be relocated,
DEM wishes to be consulted about design modifications that can reduce the impacts
to the stream and wetlands.
Response: See response to previous comments and response to USACE comment #2
above. Also, NCDOT did minimize the channel change distance to the maximum
extent practicable. All side slopes within wetlands will be 2:1, thereby reducing
encroachment.
Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 5
Comment: There is a high quality swamp forest near stations 61+50 to 62+50. DOT
will be constructing a bridge over the railroad line at this site. DEM requests that
DOT examine the feasibility of extending this bridge to reduce the impacts to this
swamp.
Response: Reference sheet 50 of permit drawings. NCDOT studied the cost of
bridging this wetland to reduce impacts. The cost of this bridge would be
approximately $1,120,000 and would reduce the fill area by 0.8 acre. In our opinion,
this minor reduction in fill area is not warranted by the cost.
Comment: A high quality bottomland hardwood system is present near station 111.
Please investigate avoidance and bridging options at this location. Placeme;it of fill
in this wetland is not acceptable unless there is no practicable alternative due to the
significant water quality functions performed by this wetland.
Response: See response to USACE comment #7.
Comment: DEM requests that another box be added to the current culvert design at
station 158+50. This will give better hydrologic connectivity to the wetland.
Response: Reference sheet 100 of permit drawings. In accordance with your request,
the design of this crossing will be revised to include another box.
Comment: Reductions in median width should be explored for the bottomland
hardwood systems identified above. In addition, reduction in median width should
also be examined for wetlands near stations 172 and 173+40.
Response: DOT maintains that the currently proposed 60-foot median width be
utilized to maximize safety of the roadway. The wetlands occurring along this project
are isolated from each other and do not extend a significant enough distance to
warrant narrowing the median This would create a dangerous weaving pattern to the
highway, which has been designed for high speeds and heavy traffic. This relocated
section of US 74 has been designated by the U.S. Congress as Interstate 74.
Therefore, a wider median is necessary to meet interstate design standards and
provide a safer facility for the traveling public.
Comment: Between stations 178 to 180 there is a wetland that has 100% canopy
coverage by Nyssa aquatica. What avoidance options were examined for this
wetland? Marks Creek is a pristine body of water that apparently never has been
dredged or snagged. DOT is proposing to relocate this stream. DEM is opposed to

Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 6
relocation of this pristine body of water. If impact to this wetland cannot be avoided,
we believe a bridge with a 22 foot median should be utilized regardless of the rural
nature of this facility in order to avoid the need for dredging.
Response: See response to previous comment and response to USACE comment #4.
Comment: Clearing of vegetation and grubbing occurs in wetlands outside of the
cut/fill slope line to the right-of-way line. Due to grubbing activity, the impacts to
wetlands should be extended to the limits of grubbing.
Response: A special provision will be included in the contract to limit clearing and
grubbing to the area inside the fill slope line.
Comment: In our March 23, 1993 memorandum, DEM did not endorse the FEIS due
to the preferred corridor selection. DOT is reminded that the 401 Water Quality
Certification may be denied if impacts to wetlands and water have not been avoided
and minimized to the extent practicable.

Response: NCDOT designed this project to ensure safe traffic flow throughout the
project corridor. Section 2.2 of the Environmental Impact Statement includes a
thorough discussion of the construction alternatives considered for this project. In
addition to unavoidable wetland crossings, there were other limitations which
restricted the corridor location selected. All potential environmental consequences
associated with this project are discussed in detail in Section 4.0 of the EIS. We have
concluded that the alignment selected will best serve traffic needs for the Rockingham
Hamlet Bypass.
ITS Environmental Protection Agency January 23, 1996
Comment: ...EPA is requesting that the subject permit application be held in
abeyance until this office receives and has the opportunity to review a complete
mitigation proposal.
Response: NCDOT has contracted the services of Environmental Services, Inc., to
locate and design mitigation sites for this project. ESI has located two potential
mitigation sites for this project. Both sites were field reviewed by the permit review
agencies on May 6, 1996 and presented at the May 16, 1996 permit review meeting.
We hereby request your comments on these two sites so that we may proceed with
property negotiations and mitigation site design.
Mr. Wayne Wright
June 17, 1996
Page 7
I trust that your comments have been adequately addressed by our responses. If you have any
questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/lh
Attachments
cc:,,To?hn Dorney, DEM, DEHNR
Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Thomas Welborn, EPA
N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
F. E. Whitesell, P.E., Division 8 Engineer
Archie Hankins, P.E.
Victor Barbour, P.E.
Tom Shearin, P.E.
Kelly Barger, P.E.
D. R. Morton, P.E.
-.
r. STATE a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
November 29, 1995
Regulatory Branch
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. Wayne Wright
9 5a 50-
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
rid=; - 5 1995
SUBJECT: Richmond County: US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass from East of Pee
Dee River to East of SR 1615; T.I.P. No. R-0512; State Project No.
6.589001T
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to construct a
new controlled-access, 4-lane divided highway bypassing Rockingham and
Hamlet. The proposed 25 kilometer (16 mile) corridor is part of the
Thoroughfare Plan for the Cities of Rockingham and Hamlet developed by NCDOT.
It will relieve the downtown areas of these cities of through traffic
utilizing existing US 74. The roadway is also expected to encourage growth
in the areas south of Rockingham and Hamlet, while providing improved
circumferential movement through the area. A Final Environmental Impact
Statement was approved for this project on December 1, 1992. Copies of the
EIS were circulated to the permit review agencies at that time. Additional
copies of this document will be provided upon request.
A pre-application field review of the project corridor was conducted for
the environmental review agencies on October 17 and 18, 1995. In attendence
were representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of
Environmental Management and N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. During the
site visit, agency personnel were given an opportunity to review all wetland
impact sites to be associated with the project.
Construction of this project will require permanent fill in 20.9
hectares (51.6 acres) of jurisdictional wetlands. Additionally, 0.74 hectare
(1.8 acre) of temporary fill in wetlands will be necessary. All wetlands
were delineated in accordance with the Corps of Engineers' 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual by NCDOT and its consultants. Wetland boundaries were
verified by the Corps in field meetings with the consultants and during the
October 1995 site visit. All impact sites are located within the Yadkin and
Lumber River Basins. The attached permit drawings illustrate all wetland
impact sites.
The EIS details local wetland ecosystems considered in the early
planning studies. Due to the linear nature of the project, complete
avoidance of wetland crossings is impossible. As discussed in the document,
0
November 29, 1995
Page 2
a variety of environmental and socioeconomic factors were examined. Thus,
the preferred corridor represents avoidance and minimization of collective
project impacts to the community. During design of the roadway, impact
minimization measures were implemented where prudent and feasible. 2:1 fill
slopes were utilized to reduce the fill area in wetlands when possible.
NCDOT has studied the feasibility of bridging two of the higher quality
wetlands on this alignment. Site 21 (Station 111 + 00) on project R-0512C
will require culverting of Black Branch Creek and fill in 0.48 hectare (1.19
acres) of associated wetlands. This culvert will cost $261,000 to construct,
while a bridge crossing this system would cost $1,368,000. Site 31 (Station
178 + 00) on project R-0512D will include a bridge over Mark's Creek at a
cost of $1,137,600 and fill in 0.97 hectare (2.4 acres) of wetlands.
Extending the bridge to include Mark's Creek and its associated wetlands
would cost $3,672,000. It is the opinion of NCDOT that the increased cost
for these two bridges is not justified.
In order to mitigate the wetland impacts associated with this project,
NCDOT will develop a mitigation plan for a site to be located within the
Yadkin River Basin. The mitigation plan will be developed in cooperation
with a private environmental consulting firm. The consultant will be
responsible for locating a suitable mitigation site and developing a
restoration plan. Prior to acquisition of any property, NCDOT will ask the
review agencies to visit the proposed mitigation site(s). The mitigation and
monitoring plans will be submitted to the agencies for formal review prior to
detailed design and construction.
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Individual 404
Permit as required for such activities. By copy of this letter, we are also
requesting 401 Water Quality Certification by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management.
NCDOT will hold its monthly permit review meeting in Raleigh on
Thursday, January 18, 1996. The design of this project and associated
wetland impacts will be open for discussion at that time. The steps taken to
avoid or minimize wetland fill areas will be reviewed. All interested
agencies are invited to review this project in detail during the meeting.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, please
contact Cyndi Bell at [phone], Extension 306.
Sincerel ,
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFVJtp
attachments
cc: Mr. F. E. Whitesell, P. E., Division 8 Engineer
Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR
Mr. Scott McLendon, DOA, Wilmington
Mr. N. L. Graf, P. E., FHWA
Mr. Archie Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P. E., Design Services
Mr. Tom Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P. E., Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, P. E., Highway Design
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTib ERT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
(33 CFR 325) Expires 30 September 1992
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response for the majority of cases, Including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Applications for larger or more complex
projects, or those in ecologically sensitive areas, could take up to 500 hours. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service, Directorate for Information Operations and Projects, 1215 Jefferson
Davis Highway, Suite 1204. Arlington, VA 222024302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710.0003), Washington, DC 20503. Plena
DO NOT RETURN your completed form to either of these addresses. Completed application must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdkdon over the
location of the proposed activity.
The Department of the Army permit program is authorized by Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 103 of the Marine,
Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act These laws require permits authorizing activities in or affecting navigable waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill
material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it Into ocean waters. Information provided on this forth will be used
in evaluating the application for a permit Information in this application is made a matter of public record through issuance of a public notice. Disclosure of the information
requested is voluntary; however, the data requested are necessary in order to communicate with the applicant and to evaluate the permit application. If necessary information is
riot provided, the permit application cannot be processed nor can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings
and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NUMBER (To be assigned by Corps) 3. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT
Telephone no. during business hours

2. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT
N. C. Department of Transportation
A/C( ) (Residence)
Planning and Environmental Branch A/C( ) (Office)
P. 0. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611 Statement of Authorization: I hereby designate and authorize
to act in my
F Telephone no. during business hours behalf as my agent in the processing of this permit application and to furnish,
upon request, supplemental information in support of the application.
A!C ( ) (Residence) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
A/C 1919) 733-3141 (Office)
• 4. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY
''
4a. ACTIVITY
Proposed construction of US 74 (ROckingham-Hamlet Bypass) from east of Pee Dee River to
US 74 east of SR 1615. A 4-lane divided highway; entails both fill and excavation in
wetlands.
4b. PURPOSE
Public Highway
sc. DISCHARGE OF DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL
Total fill in wetlands = 20.905 ha
Total excavation in wetlands = 0:759 ha
Total fill below surface water = 4.116 ha
Total undercut in wetlands = *
Total temporary fill in wetlands = 0.738 ha
*Not available at this time.
C:Mt =f%0 A A12A= Qan 01 EDRION OF JAN 91 is oesoLETE (Proponent: CeM
5. NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, ETC., WHOSE PROPERTY ALSO ADJOINS THE WATERWAY
See permit drawings for list of adjoining property owners.
6. WATERBODY AND LOCATION ON WATERBODY WHERE ACTIV17Y DOSTS OR IS PROPOSED
7. LOCATION ON LAND WHERE ACTIVITY EXISTS OR IS PROPOSED
ADDRESS:
STREET, ROAD, ROUTE OR OTHER DESCRIPTNE LOCATION
Richmond North Carolina
COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE
Richmond County
LOCAL GOVERNING BODY WITH JURISDICTION OVERSITE
8. Is any portion of the activity for which authorization is sought now complete? ? YES ? NO
If answer is "yes' give reasons, month and year the activity was completed. Indicate the existing work on the drawings.
9. List all approvals or certifications and denials received from other federal, interstate, state or local agencies for any structures, construction, discharges or other
activities described in this application.
ISSUING AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL IDENTIFICATION NO. DATE OF APPLICATION DATE OF APPROVAL DATE OF DENIAL
10. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the activities described herein. i cattily that i am familiar with the information contained in the
application, and that to the hest of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. 1 further cattily that I possess the authority to
undertake the proposed activities or t am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant.
St NATURE O APPLICANT D SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 3 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of The United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent
statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false fictitious or
fraudulent statement or entry. shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(Reverse of ENO FOAM 4345) 'U.S. Government Printing Office: 1991 - 526.23511
z
U O
W p Q
0<2
= w
n rr
co

Z
D
OQ
V °-
m

0 LU
Z=
01
Q
E
z
mr z
u u
O
N
r-
LO
I
lae

Z is-a

1 0 ? 4 ?
0- os
MKE
VICINITY MAP
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T R-512
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO U.S. 74 EAST OF
SR 1615.
SCALE AS SHOWN
Scale of Miles
0 5 to 20 30 SHEET I OF 156 OCTOBER 1995
0 to 20 30 40 48
Scale of Kilometers
IBEGIN PR
TO
WA,I)FSBt

VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF STATE PROJECT 6.589001T
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0.5 0
KILOMETERS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA
I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74.ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR Q
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 2 OF ISG SEPTEMBER. 1995
MATCH LINE
STA. 209+40 -L'-
1
J
1
!1
1!
?y
et
.moo
? J
G
0
N

-L'-POT
pO "?Y ? cy
Cc:

z

z
C LL
a o

-
co

CY

w
00 yr
? 11

P ?
? ~ a
W W
J
Q ° m
W

W
r
i
Z

W _
>
a>
d
W
Y W
r
' d N
oa
i N

?- r O O
ccW
Q d

z
N

M

r z S2

:5

LL
it z

o=

U

O O
0 " LL

v
°

7~
W 3

N

C
w
°

)
¦ = O

z 0

K 'D O
O O
d LL W
Q
N H
W
I=/1
I
a

Q o

0

204+49.010
+00.000 12.7m RT.
W
O
O
Lo
p? h
IL I
` 11
J 1

? 11
N / 1 CZ

O N
N
? N
\
??
? ?+ II
O
O WZ ,
,Or,

LL,
4n D
' r

11' \
1
F I2V!
r
n
- ?
J
t
Owl
IL 000
J mm WmZ
m
>
C
0
I'' ~ d
1,t
N_ O

O
O
N
K U
C ? N ?'
r C
Nj ?
?

?pW
+
O
N KU U
N
O

z
Y O

r
co
-n

w

c
t 4' cc
Wrm
r W W

0

d VIUN O
z
W
i OOZZE + >
J ?WZ A 0 W
r a C

N
O
1.1
<

W T
Q

? W
a[ W
O
O

O

~
O i

Z u X W
C
W
va

z
Z LL
=O
N
o
O
10 Q O
V Z O H
Z O O<
N W N
Q U)
N -0
f' VI

z O O
= m
V 02
1

00 W
J

a
i r
W

W
=
o ¢ w a v
i i
v
? o
0
y
N

Q O
O
O
r
N
1
?'
W
o
a E--
N
v 1
? ?

N y/
dY4V d
Y
+01 Od
'
.
.
00
000
o
0 '
1?
N +
f
O
O
s

N

O O
O
T
1
O
O ,
i

?.'
,?G1
0p
?P
#
M
Y. SA
Y?

62 I 62
°ROPOSED GRADE -L1-
60 60
I
WETLAND WETLAND
BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
\ / S/TE '0
f
a
\ \ I EXISTING GROUND - - -
\ 900 RCP -
48 \ V
J. Om X J Om S/DE-TAPERED RCBC
46 46
I
16100 161j0 16f40 i6t60 16=80 17f00 17120 17x40
68 68
I
PROPOSED GRADE
6 LOOP C
I
66

6 I
i
6
I
LZ ,2Z E, DENOTES WETLANDS
DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
f-a DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
5A WETLAND _y WETLAND DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
SITE 0
0 0 20 2 0 4

54 HORIZONTAL SCALE VERTICAL SCALE

'
i? I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
_ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
EXISTING G-ROUN0, RICHMOND COUNTY
48 6.5990017 (R-512A)
J. Om X J. Om '

SIDE-TAPERED gC,5C PROPOSED US 7.1. ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
-ROM EAST O= PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1121
C
i
.CAL. AS S! CWN
n H.-ET 7 _- ) 5(p SEPTEMBER 1995
Z
N LO
N O+
ti a N M
(L M O c
p z rJ' ?^ a)
a
O
A \ ~ < W
1 w ??
? N Y S
(n C) U W
O WQ &? 0
z_? Z 'tea z
o 0
D v)
cr
Z c O 0 ,n
U z w O?
p? z o O In a
O? 1 O o v vmi oo a w
C?No?p I zo & w aaL? vv) w
?w3
OQ?
o
CeL - p N J W
/ fn V
\ r? J V)
\l ? Q
Z U
_ p O r
Z = ry O >
N
zoo I
k I
O -b w
a V)
d ?' ^ eoO ib?" w J
??o 30 ~ ??' I (n LL. w
o m t -) z C
Q I a ?_ g V) z
LAj
LLJ
j cn
0 0
w <
c ____ ? ? ` -o Q m Q
1 - W J J X
? w I? w
-N O O O O
/ 3m I j z z Z z
{ w w w w
;ri ? C C C C
0 1?
,Z I
ti
'ZI
I " SAT--- Ell
2d,_S I f f .. .. ..
- i ? - N
401, NOODMONT ASSOCIATES, INC. ? r
VETlun eawAnT
i
SITE
lo"
O
\\_ -rem
\
V, \
soot
Y \
Ilk-
FEDERAL PAPERBOARD COMPANY
Q
'8 P•C
Apo, -
TOE L•RO=\r" J

DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS

I I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

®
DENOTES
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
I .f RICHMOND COUNTY
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
6.5890017 (R-512a)
PROPOSED US 74.ROCFINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS

10
0 20 I FROM EAST OF PEE DE. RIVER TO EAST OF SR :121
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 9 OF )SG SEPTEMBER ;095
HORIZONTAL SCALE
68
PROPOSED GRADE 68

66 LOOP C
66
64
64
SZ
?
EXISTING GROUND
/

750
CP11 .55h
i _
\ _ _ -
54 54

48
46 I I I I I ?
13140 J3+60 ?
13180 14+00 ?
I
14+20 14+40 %4+60 J4t80 I
15+00
68 SECTION LOOP C 68
STA. 14+40
SKEW 90'
66 I 60
I ? SLOPE
64 ?ARIES 64
I Z' 1 , \
(NORMAL)
A?Z WETLAND
I /
Z

Y
BOUNDARY

SITE
I

?fa fe-

j E;G'ST/NG

I GROUND
I
24 ;`
ne..r

j
t I I
40 20 ?
0 10
i 0 0 ?0 - 0 4
HORIZONTAL .,_aL= iERTiCAL SCALE
ffy, DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
5.589001T ;R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74. ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 11.21
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET IQ Or 15(4 SEPTEMBER 1595
±jj+ DENOTES WETLANDS
F/,?j DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS voR CaacUrva H'raRTMEYi OF iRaNSPCRTaT:J'

DENOTES
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER I DIVISICti CF 7iGRWa 5
?;C MC,D cccr_,-
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS ?.==90Ci ? : a
ooOaC;E^ JS =OCKINGHaM--:aMLET °v==SS
1 O 2 of M -a," CF GEE ?IVE= -G. =t.5- -- c-

-'EE
HORIZONTAL SCALE
f et
66
64
62
60
54
PROPOSED GRADE -L- 66
62
M
BOUNDARY
V
T
Z Lo 60
?Q
EXISTING GRouND
Z~
I ?
?v
750 RCP
aLL
I
I
I
I I I I I I I I I
14 + 00 14 +20 14 +40 14 + 60 4+80 15+00 15420 15+3.3
ScCTiON ?_?„ ? -L- Q
STA. 14+JR8
SKEPI 112' 14'
(NORMAL)
WETLAND
2:1 BOUNDARY
(NORMAL) SITE V
750 RCP CLASS lV
I _
? I
._,Z I EXISTING GROUND
-f2 _ 2
I
60
y y WI DENOTES
DENOTES
< DENOTES
DENOTES
':0 0
HORIZONTAL S
I I
i
40 20 0
WETLANDS
FILL IN WETLANDS
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
20
^ 0
-?
CALE VERTICAL SCALE
i
2C 40 60
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 7RANSPG'P.TAT10?7
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
I
RICHMOND COUNTY
5.5890017 (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74, RCCh NGHAM-HAMS:' ?YPASFROM. EAST OF PEE OE_ RIVER TO _ -- ?,- SR-
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHE"c: 12 I5I,
fill

DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
10 0 20
HORIZONTAL SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COLN-
6.539001T :R-:i2A)
PROPOSED US 7-. ROCKINGHAM-=AMLET !BYPASS
FROM EAST CF DE= OEE RIVE:; -C EAST OF SR .:21
SCALE AS 10904
SHEE 13 `.S(? cE"?'c!.!GE?
v?
Ze
PROPOSED GRADE -L-
2.9790
66
Wo
Q i

V

WETLAND
6 SOUNDARY
SITE O i

EX/STIN G
y GROUND
y

,5 PROP. 2 ® 27m x 2. Im RCBC

151 40
15160 15180
164-00 I
164-20 16140 16160 164-80
17
ST-
SEC
TION "D-D" 15195.61
SKEW 1.30'35 51 " 66
64 6.s

62 2:1
(NORMAL) I F WETLAND
BOUNDARY
62
SITE O
60 60
/
/ 2:1

(NORMAL)
fd EXISTING 5A
GROUND

PROP. 2 2.7m x 2.1 m RCBC
S?
60 40 20 0 20 40 6G

yy y DENOTES WETLANDS

DENOTES
FILL IN WET I
LANDS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOP.TATICN
i DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER RICHMOND COUNTY
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS I 5.589001T (R-;, v,)
PROPOSED US 74. P•JCHINGHAM-HAM L= BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER 70 EFS' ,F SP
t 0 'C 20 J -1 SCALE AS SHOWN
!
rI
HOR170NTIAL SCALE VER-;CA!_ SCALE
.000? 1%
JAMES HLINTLEYJR.
A SITE 0 \\ ?,;
' `fib
-nE?tAio eo soar' r orro?
P '
?om:N 1
WEnA1D 90ltDARY
/ smzvL OAOj FEDERAL PAPERBOARD COMPANY ;i
DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
® DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER RICHMOND COUNTY
5.589001T IR-512A)
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
` PROPOSED US 7-1,ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
1 Q 0 O FROM EAST OF -EE DEE RIVER TO EAST .)F SR 1121
SC-LE AS .HO'WN
sHcL- 15 15fo SEPTEMEGF.°.95
HORIZONTAL SCALE
74 74
PROPOSED GRADE -L 1-
0 -2.6389,
2-0-
56- 68
66 66
64 64
62 62
60 -- ---------- EX/STING GROUN- ----------
--
?
- 5A
I I .I I I I I
23100 2312 23140 23160 23x-80 24-f00 24+20
0
PROPOSED GRADE RAMP A
6
6
WETLAND
62 1 BOUNDARY -?
SITEO
60
PROP. 2 0 2.7m x 2. I m RC8C
EX/STING GROUND
24+40
0
?- 8
6
WETLAND
BOUNDARY 6
62
/ 00"0

55-
56-
?
15+00 I
15t20 I
15+40 I I
15+60 15+80 I ? I I ?
i6+00 16=20 16+40 i5T50
F-77 DENOTES WETLANDS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DENOTES !LL IN WET LANDS I

tom. _
DENOTr-
- -- BE OW
SURFACE WATER RICHMOND COUNTY
I
5.5890017 (R-51?A)
! ! DENOTES L- C . AT,ON .N WETLANDS
PROPOSED US 74. ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
ROM EAST OF :)EE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1'"1
0 - .r-. SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 16 OF 15(o SEPTEMBER 1995
H0Rl-7CN7=L ;C=L- VERTICAL SCALD
SECT/ON
74 74
C LOOP C -L1-
72 I STA 18+01.1
'
'
"" STA 23+40 72
SKEW 96
24
8 SKEW 90' -
za zol

V
? 2:1
(NORMAL) fA
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
\ SITE0

\ EXISTING GROUND 64

\
? AIL

? I I I I I ?
60. 40 20 0 20 40
SECTION "?-?"
RAMP A
SITE O7 STA. 15 +73.65
ja I SKEW 36'31 '39"
2:1 ,
2:1 (NORMAL)
(NORMAL)
64
EXISTING
GROUND ?Z
§12
PROP. 2 ® 2.7m x 2. 1 m RCBC 1

40 20 0 2I0 40

y DENOTES WETLANDS
I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

DE-NOT, S
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512A)
DENOTES E XCAV,ATION IN WETLANDS I PROPOSED US ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR '121
2 0 a SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 17 OF S(p SEPTEMBER 1995
=0RIZC•NTA_ SCAL_ VERTICAL SCALE
hMr -A-
- -----------------' - -----
TOE FROTEC11011
91011iFA a1
+
s R?R)r
la +?
LA
L2m Yg OTTCU
` f`
i
i
/ F + PRgo
coaE .ooos
i?
j " FEDERAL PAPO ARD COMPANY SITE O
"
DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
10 0 20
HORIZONTAL SCALE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPORTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
41CHMOND COUNTY
i
t
i 6.589001T (R-512A)
i PROPOSED US 74. ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1121
i SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEE- 18 OF ISto SEPTEMBER 1995
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
WETLAND
?I BOUNDARY
72
70 PROPOSED GRADE -L- \
1 2.9799' WETLAND
68
W O
66
_N
5
V ?
V
I
lzQ
.?B
I BOUNDARY
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
S/TE lO
EX/STING GROUND 7
72
. O
70
_ 68
Q I
z ?' 66
?Q.
I I I I I I 1 1
174 17+ 10 17+46 17to"0 17? 80 18+00 1Bt20 18 f 40
SECTION "E-f"
74
\ STA 17+80 /
Z 1 SKEW 90'
\(NOR,t1AL)
70
2:1 /
(NORMAL) 7
66 EXISTING GROUND
644 \ I
i
WETLAND
BOUNDARY
SITE tO
50
i
60 40
20 0 20 40 6o 0
I
DENOTES WETLANDS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS ; DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
•? ?? I
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER RICHMOND COUNTY
6.5890017 (R-512A)
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS PROPOSED US 74, ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR '121
I SCALE AS SHOWN
C. 20 7 Q 4
SHEET 19 OF 15(o SEPTEMBER '995
?QR!_-NTAL SCALZ VERTICAL SOLE
1
1
1
1
1
Ih
?.z
REBEKAH NICHOLS MCLEAN
PROP.R/W
-w WEN
y pROP.RIW
!F
ss s lwur
T06
Tl. `.
-L-

3c

c -------------------1__.
---' ? 8 1IMUr
IDA TONS
aiss a K /
mA TOR /
F Y ?eTUws ?(
Knao
mallaw
FEDERAL PAPERBOARD COMPANY
SITE I? Q
DENOTES WETLANDS
® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER
DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS
10 0 20
HORIZONTAL SCALE
.ER.A1C ? ? 1
DENSE VOWS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 'PANSPORTAT:0N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
0.589001T cR7:(2Ai
I
PROPOSED US 74.ROCKINGHAM-HAMLE' BYPASS
FROM EAST OF DEE DEE RIVER, TC =LS' OF SR _
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 20 OF )S(, ,E?-_'.Bc3 _.7
76 ' - ZE
PROPOSED GRADE RAMP A
74 \ 74
ZZ WETLAND 4 >>By, zz
BOUNDARY /
WETLAND
BOUNDARY 2-0-
---, O
900 RCP
56 i I \ ?
EXISTING GROUND
64 64
LZ LZ
12 x 00 12120 12140 12160 12 80 f-0-
13+00 13- 20 1 3140
`Q
Za / Zq
76 PROPOSED GRADE -L- /
74
74
2975,
O /
WETLAND EXISTING GROUND
EXISTING W I WETLAND
2 BOUNDARY BOUNDARY i
TQ ¢$ SITE 1
j O 900 RCP -'
F_2
? I
1d-x-40 ;8+60 18*80 1,9+00 19+20 ;c-a0 79I60
y .y DENOTES WETLANDS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR-VENT OF TPANSP,PTATION
I
DENOTES FILL IN WET LANDS DIVISION OF HG+WAYS

q
DENOTES
I
FI
E
r ?
E RICHMOND CCc:,?'
LL B
LOW SURFACE WAT
R
DEMOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS PROPOSED US -=, RCCK!IIG _AM-HAMLE- -?'ASS
FROM EAST OF =rc Gr_ •. _.. TC EAST SR 121
I
' 0 0 20 _ 0 SCAL_
SH--- 21
0 ILOiJTA.L SCALE VERTICAL SCALE
SECT/ON "F-F"
7
76
74-
2:1
72 (NORMAL)
711.\
66
64
80 60
78
RAMP A /
STA. 12+51.07 STA. 18 (97.62 /
SKEW 10.3'20'46" /
I SKEW 108' 1349" 7a

WETLAND
BOUNDARY WETLAND
SITE O BOUNDARY
1 900 RC,-_ ,SITE O VI
I
I
40 20 0 20
/
2:1 zz
/
(NORMAL) \ EX/STING
/ GROUND 20-
5A
f 5-
i 1
40 - 60
yyyy DENOTES WETLANDS
DENOTES `LL IN WETLANDS
DENOTES FILL BELOW SURFACE WA-ER
DENOTES rXCAVATION N WETLANDS
10 0 '? 0 .0
HORIZONTAL SCALE VE=-,:. +L _ALE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
i DIVISION OF -IGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNT"
j 6.589001 T (R-512A)
PROPOSED US ROCKINGHAm-HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF DEE RIvEP 70 EAST GF SK 7121
SCALE AS SHC
SHEET 22 1-(0 -=PTEMBE' -90-
FILL

SITE NO.
STATION
STRUCTURE FILL
IN EXCAVATION
IN BELOW
SURFACE UNDERCUT
IN TOTAL
FILL IN
WETLANDS WETLANDS WATER WETLANDS WETLANDS
(ha.) (ha.) (hectares) (cu. M.) (cu. M.)
cu.m

-L1 16+50-16+63 1 @ 3.0 x 3.0 RCBC
LOOP C 12+11 -12+17
LOOP C 14+30 -14+49 NO STRUCTURE
-L-14+54- 16+53 750 RCP
1 -L-17+54 -18+14 2 @2.7x2.1 RCBC 2.84 0.146 0.92 232300
-L-18+62 -18+67 900 RCP 58900
RAMP A 12+56 -12+61 900 RCP
RAMP A 15+64 -16+33 2 IM 2.7 x 2.1 RCBC
2 -L- 21+85 - 72+95 NO STRUCTURE 0 0.104 0 0
3 -L- 22+95 - 23+05 NO STRUCTURE 0 0.004 0 0
TOTALS 2.84 0.254 0.92 232300
56900
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS= 2.84 hectares / 232300 cu, m.
TOTAL EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS = 0.254 ha.
TOTAL FILL BELOW SURFACE WATER = 0.92 ha. / 56900 cu.m.
NOTE: ALL WETLAND SITES ARE ABOVE HEADWATERS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 74, ROCKINGHAM -HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1121
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 23 OF 15(, SEPTEMBER 1995
PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESSES
1) Woodmont Associates, Inc.
c/o Leomard Taylor
4500 Magnolia Bridge Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28210
2) Federal Paperboard Company
c/o Tom Haene
P:O. Box 146
Southern Pines, NC 28387
3) James Huntley, Jr.
P.O. Box 4207
Marshville, NC 28103
4) Rebekah Nichols McLean
P.O. Box 123
Rockingham, NC 28379
5) J. Keith Croke
Rt. 3 Box 353-0
Rockingham, NC 28379
6) Johnny D. Coltrane and wife
Patricia Y. Coltrane
P.O. Box 53
Rockingham, NC 28379
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512A)
PROPOSED US 7a, ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF PEE DEE RIVER TO EAST OF SR 1121
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 24 OF ISG SEPTEMBER 1995
c i _ Q c _ ` :a tom:
0
e ,
V)
/1 ^^
I r / V ` _ J° Ins :I Li 00
(If 0
LL-
Fri
E;NCtf
N
U
CM ?. ICI MY '6' O? - ? p`l/ n ti Z V / / f?
!o O g W O Z J W
go'
a j i = [-L- xO
gl t O =1 a ?? LL.
/` • - Ll ?I n •SI ^I ,n ? ? .I ? ?.` _J -1 U e! v y ? O Z
CD,
Uc/)
LA-
O
L5 o in
1 J 1 ?1
V) LLJ
i ,. 'I ???g 1? o ?O Z z x
E
y; • a ?r y Q
O f }a ma a °a S `AE a ^y •? _ • o
N e „ - - T
i.o• i t O \ w ° ° u ° ?..J ?l
?l1' ' ? M ? r cc
- o O e t^ z^,, ?~ ?, ? E
E a _? ? ? ? ? _o W
Is mod' " / XSJ LL •?
e ° 0 0
0
I
mE -- T 25 OF 15(?

? J
. i•
:J

U;0
:00 \
!,
[if;Lr)

z'c N
w cn -
v O \ 1

ti

?O
??
\ OQ

Q
- ? CD

(DO 42/
Q N
4& C)

O ' 'SR U O°1
i
0

? N

V 1A
J
Cf'
c t
V1

I = NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
mCN
! DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5126)
w {° US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
° EAST OF SRI 121 TO WEST OF SRI 103
Z
N SCALE AS SHOWN
?
w I? SHEET 2e- OF 15L-l
m ??
Sd Sd
1-1
Z•L 67 6 Z L o N N,N,?
05\ OS w ?
X00+6Z 08 O? 08 9 ?< z
? J
S 1 i
. ° °oo
O
r- cD (_0
341 301-
,.. ,
o
olg ° x7by? ? `? `? Q
rn I o co NQ/t3 ' U8b21 w
A 11 )p 0
?--
.
i ]? . \ (n . . . ice C(- 3: LAJ ..
W tl st ?{ r '? _ ?
N
cr- L I <5\c) w 1- a p O
a- O1 O ? 3c: cV l? _ O O rn
ti
C:) 00 114- r4r)
Lo b-) 4_ r- CN
C14 :;
o `d- >
Ob
00+9Z
CD ,o:
LOCflw 6-
tiYS-06+LZ }S
I 3 Cn Oa- ?- ?o-
I? . ¢ °o `.z 6-
J -7 ` p `OJ 2>
r- C) ag C)
10 U I 1.• ?\ LJ , QZ ?6
oio ?' ° `v
+ I J ?¢ Q Q . . ti `.
Q ` I `? `.
8Z t 5-b 1331`08d
NfO3 ?
8 06+LZ d1S o
.? U
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
LEGEND O m DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5m O 10m RICHMOND COUNTY
T4 WETLANDS < 6.589001T (R-512B)
-a- a- SCALE Q US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
FILL IN WETLANDS o EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 97 OF ?KCo
WETLANDS
J \
l 1
a
ep>
no
Q \ •,c P
U
d
EG ND
a-?-4-4 L
eeeeeee
even ene
aeeaeae
o .
f7 )b??
?by? O NyOr
c_
N M
1-4- O
r-

y?
'. Z
\\??\
? p
3 i-
J
Z ?Q

? \
d ? f

d

v
,
TEMPORARY FILL
IN WETLANDS
5mO 10m
SCALE
AffwJ

W
i Z
J
CL*
h; O
f
\
i0 _
?- IO r?
f-
-NQ DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5126)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAML E-i BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET Z e) OF )5G
?I :T1I 'J7I ?I ?- o
N
\ (J
\
\ o Q J E w
\
0
\ ` o v N ? d-
`I
? Z J
\ Q J
o : a n- ?, - Z Q
C) CD E
C) cz) ol 0 0
C,i CD
cy_
+?o ° w
cW.D p O >
? N
II II II , ° _
/
a w U-)
-+
/ 00
/ N
1
000'L2+8Z 0d
p
/ Z
/ o
/ Q) -
,
` Z
J \ l U O E--
i \\ - -
W \ / o
p CD N
Lr)
CD O co N \ p
Ljj a_
p
j W
\ :a O
LLI
0
I _Lo
J C1'
8Z 19-h ! 03r0dd
NI838 D-LLZ NIS
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
of o1 11 NI of .11 .I ..-1 NI RICHMOND COUNTY
° cn cn m 6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET ? 9 OF ??
e
?i o? o! of ?i
o_
I
1
?

? - II ?1 W
?
I i?
LLJ
W
O
N
I
i
I
1
1
1
NN; 1
O ?I l

74
O
Q
I ? .;a O

0-- ----- - C)

C) w

CD o
cn
U
'- o f W
CDf ;
off;
In
N
W
J
Q
U
O
CD
N !
rr
i'o
r
r .?
i O V)
! 0
O ! z
r ?
! w
r ?
! z
r ? J
r IV%
o _ Z
` li
U-i
r
r
C:)_ r
M/d; 'dOdd
NI col ter O) oI C-01 NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
o I o 1:1)I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 30 OF 1l?(0
LAJ
i
C:) Ln
Lo -
to CN
a o o°
C)
wZ
LLJ0?
eo?
-ui
d m
LLJ Q ,
O 20
O 00
CD O t?
t N \ :• t
?o
o \ ? Z
', \ t
V) °
O O
i O r v O
\ a ?
' 'Y7 O L0
L0 F-
Z
i
t w ,
°o
OS o a o! C) .? .
Sd , o Lo
6 Sd4, %
6 z L
00+Z? ,
EEil;EN NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WETLANDS RICHMOND COUNTY
" 6.589001T (R-5128)
FILL IN WETLANDS US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
5m Ol Om EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3/ OF 1SG
_ol of of i oI o` of rnl rnI °o
I .a-
. II ?• "7
1
1 0
{ o
CCD
\ W
\j M
t •ii%ii??i leeii%Eieie3eii °i i'eei's';r 's'Ei %e?
MIN

LLJ
ii ;iii%%%%ii%i% ?%:%%:••? iiiiiiiiiii%%%%iiii:e:%%i%:•••.?

lZ
%s%%%%%i%i'i%iiiYi'iii?•ii '%'i:%i%iii% '%ii? L n

CL
;i•%iii%i%iii%iE
?
eieiE? ?iiiii%ji 'je%? ieiFi' iiie%•.•,F?
'iii
%% 2 - 'I-
%
%
:iii:::itfi•i..i.:•i•t•iiiiiiif:•iii .f if i : S..iSi.:
M I
?)

?i•i.;.i•?? :i::.:.i.t.ifi•.ii:i:i:i::;I:%:i•f'i:, lY

O
C E
pOO
N O C)
N ty) O
+ t\
M
tl II II
d w >
b\
O
V
CI
D
/ Z

1
/ O
J

C
/ Z

O
Lr>
N
s" )

O E W
N J
Q
U
?
J
J
Q
U
O O
1-
_ Of

O >
N
N
Z
W
Z
J
Z
W
VIZ
co
N
°I of of of o1 of -d
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
-N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
f US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 32 OF )5L

C)- _... .._.. _.. T... .._ E
N

1
I
l
1

O 1

1 I W
Q

O

1 Z
:l
Q
:q
1

O :1 C
N w In

°o
I
? .`.

O

q)il
O _
CN
LLJ
a z Ld
1
i
L 11
CO _ 7 /
t
f
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
°_ - - RICHMOND COUNTY
"' M/? 'dOdd'
6.589001T (R-51213)
o o US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 33 OF ?5(?

f 1
\ 1
? \
C 1 \

I LL 1 \J-
r r0'
m
I
Q
WyI J 1
!
I
C)i 10 ^ 00+ 1

+
c! r 2 1
i
1 ;
11- , •? •
i

oo+L? 41

1 •
?J

C) I
I
I
M
O
O i p to
H
Lo -

Z O 1
' L J °S
?
\ . W i

?; 1
! 1
IL a
I
1
OO+gf,-L-
:s z
LLJ
° al-
V)
Z ?G
d
O
W 1 Of

1 1
N 1
01
0-
p
U
1 O
O 1 u z
1
1
1
1
W 1 p
J-
I L0 N
I
1 Z
W 1

J St
W
Y
1
d. 1--00.0 D
0
1
1 i
?
1 ' 1 1+00

i ? ? -? r
? U I
1 1
j ?' '
f I I
?_? 1
? 1
I ?
11 1 I
I ? I
11
II ' I
O 0 01
C? f`I
00 oo
I, I 1 r-
1

L

WE LLANDS y
7-71 FILL IN WETLANDS Sm 010m
SCALE
I/ -
Z 1

1
m
,
11
i
u I I
I Z
1
!i ~ GU
Z I
i J
=
Q
cm W O '
i

,
i3z
C/) 000'
00+

° °as lod 00f0.
,
I
N
O N
o
"
/ r- N

/

NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
_ 6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121- TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 34 OF 15c?
z
N
Z
0
Q
Of
N ¢; °
_ o
C UW
.;o
o,^ N
- -?-, w
Y

Q ?-----?G G

W
1 tel.. > `o ' ? . ?
s s ?
t _
Z ?.
w
v
o
o
r)
wof
wof
?

Lij O
^
r.-)?
' ^ T
L N
5m G 10m
WETi a_NDS SCALE
a
TEMPORARY FILL
es eeeea !N WET kNDS I 1 ?`l
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO"r
DIVISION' OF HIGH A AYS
RiCHMOND COUN r
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMIL ET BYPASS) FROM
CAST nC CDI 11) TO -ST OF SD11n-z
LAST VI JI\ 11 21 V TIIAtLI VI i\ I i VJ
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 35 OF )"-G
i o of of of I rnI cn m o
f o
1 +
00
1
CL:
1 ? .
1
1 °
1 O J u-J
E
N w
I W - U Q
1 3 ? U
I ? J (n
I 1 0 ~ Q
°w O O L
I I o w
-+ O O E >
1 M N
t%
I
!1
w
1
c
w i 1
N
O 1
O 1
a
°o W
M
J i
z
r` ! 5
9 1 Z
C)
? 1
1 0 _J
Z
o ¢ 1 - + `
O O 41*1 _ M J
N O 00 O Q
?. O
r?04 /
000[0+9f Od ; o NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
-° DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
of o) of oI o) ? I ?) ? ) in ) 6.589001T (R512B)
i lS 74 (Rn(,Kil\('NAM-NAM 7 RYPAgC) PPOU,.
O
_
^
O_
CD
O
-
u-)7

-
CD
?f-
o -

I a'f
U te
'
r
'
)
O _
N O

o?
0
-
o'

J
CC

cb
C _ O
O?
I O?
m O?

O_
I
CN I O)
C)_

N
W
Q
U
U

C)
0
z +
0 v LLJ

U CJ)
W

0
z Ln
O C3
U ~
W
? z
Z
I LLLLJJJJ?'
'. / ?"-"',JAI'
1r
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 37 - OF 1 56
1 co i
1 1
?1
" j 3
i 2
1 cnl cn
i
? I U ? I
00 S - -
c) g
?o i rZ CQ
%(Dc)
O mz
Lr) QW ?'
I O
LLJ
C) L-) N LLJ
Ln c
?w
S000M./3SN30 i
J r n
'•' cn
o
S
CD
3SN3? '
SGOW
89 ' 6+ 3 _
V
O = I i
? ? /? v< I L{ ?? T ?'
c0 / ?? XF 'f LLJ O
°?
C-D
¢i m I `.\
LEGEND =
o 1 ? Y?
cd o NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
CD,
a? a WETLANDS W °i r5 00 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
° `t RICHMOND COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS ? -6 6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
+++++ CUT IN WETLANDS Sm 010m EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
+
SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
FILL BELOW SHEET 38 OF
SURFACE (WATER
..LJ
oI of o) o) coil rnl rn? I? rn? rnl co ?I
fI ? w
0 o E o ?° O Q
E- LL
0, CN
CD Sri o (n
r^i N k
? Ncn
h
W
p II II '? `\ F -
C) :m
T
E
j O O E >
nN "I
S y a:
o
o?O
O C5 O
II 11 II L? LLI
W r')
u
I ?
I :•'y U
o= 5 N .
.00
w o
Lom
Z
cr C)
Lr)
?< I Q Z J J
o z LLJ u-Lij o w
J
a /
i
o O! O O cn cn m m ?I cI cI
I I I
I I
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SRI 121 TO WEST OF SRI 103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 3 OF 1 L•
°I °i 1 °1 °1 l =1 -1 -1 °1 ?1 ?1 p E E w
N U ? Q
U
• ? o Q
S -? o 0 o v
ckf
\\ w
\ O Cl- = N
\ W v
\ W vnxv _
sr \
\ ? V
N ? E \
+OFq j
N
\ O
T
l
d W
..............
i f
000•0ti+S l Od
i
Lo _
l
W
Z
N
C) O W C?l
O / y J
Q. O / Z C/>
o° z ? 3
M 3 OJ
o I z w
1 p
' Z
C>
0 ?
-+
&.0 w
J
oI col of °I °I °, I cn m 'm cn I
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 4-0 OF i5',P

, 510 O C
D m N
?
:I 1 I -=
l c1 I
O _
Lo
i

c t
I
O
O
M
i
I
1
I
I
I
1
'dON ' '
E
ul)
O _
N
O _
I•
O C-4i - -
0
Z
C)
F-'
U
W
C?
I
O
DO W
L
• (n
N
0
z
s-
w
3
z
J
Z ?
vi)
::, 0 __ WE
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 41 OF 5(,
N
00 d- o cD N Op
i
I
i
O -
I
I
I p
i
r
i F-
r W
r ?
O -
1"7 r
? W
I C-5
I p

W
I
? I
I
d`

o
V)

°
; F-
- `:
LjQ w

0
6
T
I o
z

o- j J

I

o
? - I
i
I
I
I
I
I
oI oI of MI M? I ?(
W
Q
U
N
E
w
w

a-
z w
o °
°
U ?
w
cry
0
z
5
W
z
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR 1121 TO WEST OF SR 1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 42 OF 156
500311
•0 ,cC?217 o
'0-9 Ll
s
v ?? a o
°)
Did
W ? v \
I ?d
O?
? J v? o 0
o ` 5 Z Z
N6 w
? 6• . ? w
CC ? ? ?+ t
` 000 \ ?9
S
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPCRT,T!CN
o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
,- O RICHMOND COUNTY
Q - - - 6.589001T (R- 5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
o SHEET 43 OF
?
C-D
-
-
t
&aoee,f N• m?VcnY
J? k/iF-F- , P,TrH M- MAMMY
O_
O N
O N7
O ?
O
W
C/7
LEGEND
WETLANDS
eeeeeee TEMPORARY FILL
eeeeeee
eeeeaaa IN WETLANDS
ANA WIFE
GG
JGE` M 8 E C OGS
- L\8

NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
5m O 10m RICHMOND COUNT,
? 6.589001T (R-5128)
SCALE US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 44 OF 1SC
0 3NIIHDiVA O
0l I
0 oI m1 °) co 0
I ?ig I " I I Do ?I ?
0 0 0 0 \
c°o?o 1
4- N O
N W 09ZT6 (000'09+) -±
aw>
E LLJ
\\ C> o Q J
C-5 a
U
\ J V)
\\ <
\\ z o z O U
\\ 1 W
t, \\ / O El >1
o C14
\`p
W ? -a-
? 1
c..: 1
0 t
W
O
a 4
o _
o Cn
i -+
io.---? CN
OL
Z
Z -
3 LLJ
°-
z
o
W
o
C)
° -+
/I
oI oI a.,I m m rnI rnl ooI w w IooI 00I
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 4-S OF ??°
C
00 C14 C> 't- O1 ?\\ ?t Ol C? CO N ..
co
I I F'
?
?
??
? J
Ew J
? cv U mot- Q
? - U
? C
\ Q J
\ ~
Z Q
\ U
O p O ?
_N
116, c?
U? N
.. ?
oLo o ?? -
0
o ul
?w>
1
o.. Z o --
?o 5 -? Cn
ow co / of 3 'i
? o
?
n
o
- z
Q
? z
/ U' Z J cZ_
/ O
-T p
LLI
Z
1
i
co -I
/
N oI ,? N NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
°'I °'I °'I °'I °'I °°I oOI 0O) °OI DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET A<p OF 18G
rn I ?
1
1NIOd MHS I
o - I
I
I
I
I
O - I
I
I?
i \\
o - I
I
I °
z
I °
N - I O
I Z
Ol I
O ? I W ?-
O I 3 Z
l
a
i Q
I W
_ i
- I?
00
CD C-;Lj
c
i.
?- o
c:)
N
O
O

O _
N
O

d'
0
-
ter-
Lr) 00
00
Lo
N
w
J
Q
U

J
U
cn
0
Z
F-
w
3
z
Q J
ZI

NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 47 OF )'?>(D
E
c"ll
o) o rnI rnl col
M/d dOdd.? - ..I-
O_
O _
fle)
w
J
U
U7
O_
N 1
O
0
CD C?-j C -

p

z ?
O ° w
I=
+
I=
U = cn
III '
C/-)
0
z
o _ o cn
I o z
c° O
I C° ? z
o I? z z
I ,
I i
I i
V
i
1
j NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
I DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
i RICHMOND COUNTY
j 6.589001T (R-512B)
o) °oI ?I cnI C0I US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 48 OF 15L
i
00+Z9 1 1
I I
I I
I I ?? I
I ,, I
_ U :•?' 1 1
4- I
C=>- WON
i ooo 1
C:)
00 { t.
+ cn I ?;. ?; Y 1? ua
.?' ?• ?:. 1 loan
c) Lo
00 u< ¢IW ??•1 t? ^i? I 0 ooi 0
c o
I-= I
O i mod-
?'` O to I 'H N ?y„JZ i U ? W 1 ? ??
+.to I CU'OO I o FQ-i? I ED
10 F- _1 II- VT
I o'?¢ I !wz I
C) LL_
V ° fI-
z V) PSI
W '? -c10? - Imcn ; _ o °o
301- -
V) i N3 210 - _ 1 { _ +I o co
-+-d01- .7301
s _ ??NO??N I
°z•
I
'j ?!Z m I ' 1 a
J 2 ? 3 rn!a >_ ? I- I O
LLJ
LLJ
/ f--,ISO I , ..•• •:. :'?I'.z1 ? a
M { +I '..f
LLJ
C) J?? cam, .?' ! -
"f -------?---
? 00+19
o NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
G ND DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
WETLANDS y 6.589001T (R-512B)
5m O 10m GS 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
FILL IN WETLANDS EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
FILL BELOW SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
SURFACE WATER SHEET 50 OF 15?
i ___ ?7I ?7I 7I Cc)i cI rti ci ci C-0 ...,
I I

rn
rn
oNjo
nl=
? C
OlLj
H
OO
O
c
LD
T
1
J
W
0
C7
W
N
O
CL
O
C
a
101 101 L0
pE
1 2•
S\oJ :.. Lr)
• o
Z
w
3
w
0
n
_ w
15-0
0
L0
N
LO
F- W
O J
Q
N
U
U)
I ~
O O
E . O
2
j
1 N W
LD F_
? WI
? J
Q
U
V)
O 0
E ?
N

W

C
D
W

C) Ln

? LL
C

W W
O ? z O
W J J
J J
LLJ
11
L
J
vl •? I QI ?I
G ?
C Z
Z C7
?I
?I ul-) I UO col
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHANI-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEt7 6 1 0 F 1? ,
o 0 1 CD I :n Lr) ? ? ?
I I ? I
? I
O
O
r7
O
N
O
1 ? ZO
IIrv
+J°
':
V
V
O - G3.J J _
i
O
N -
0
?n -
?I I ?I I I
? °f ? ?
0
z
0
_N
J
Q
l?
Q
z
Ln
N
LJ
JI
V
J:rl
E
Lo
z
o + w
U `J (f)
w .
J;/7
z
J
LEI
Z
J
J
Z L.L
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNT?'
6.589001T (R-51:2B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 52 OF )SG

N
;n
i
O 1- ? J
U
00 Lij O f O O
O
O
i
?
Q
? Z
cn W
O
N o
J
O N
O Lo
O
m I-c%j
)
C•

of
a
0
oo c
\ to
1; \ o°OO! o c-c
t VQ I
I ?r
O t I__1_J ?
Cfl
tp1 °0 0
}.' of o
pp+591
I^ Lnl3
I JLo -
0-)\?J-
U')
Lo!p
c! °o
?r) CO /
°
loa 'y
O - O
71 O U-i
\II ?- to
f-i oo N
f

x ?
1
1 J

Z

1

l
ie
'C- ?-?

:O O I
c 1
(C5) '.0

:Ln I
1
(AS ?J
LEGEND 5m O l 0m
LEGEND
SCALE
WETLANDS

FILL IN WETLANDS
I' . * . * . , . * . , . * . '.]
....... TEMPORARY FILL
nnsannan L_
enannan
nnnnnnnn IN WETLANDS
LN 76 [.L
I
1
1
1
1
I
li O
1 ?
1 0-
1
1
4 ? YN
trr t
`111m
F
tz
O O
d
O co
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 53 OF IS(o
1.0 co (.0 co Lr) Lr) L0 L0 LI)
EW
J
\\ o v w
\\ (n U
\ N
QJ
U-) 0 0 ol ?Xjcz)
O co N
op
o E O = E
0000 3 ? N
?1 O
Lo Lo co
W
II II it ?
O _
_ W
a >w ?
N
C)
? o
I ? Q
J / U
I 9 -
W
? i z p
i N
O
° I ?-
V7 I
Q W
1 O L0
°- I ¢ - + ?
Z
\. z
w
\
\
\
? o
i o
I +
?I ?I ?I ?? ?1 sF
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTAT ION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 54' OF 151,

M/8 "dOdd
t
t
1
1
1
C) -
?
t
t
1
t ? -
t
t ?
t

Off- i D -
? t
1
1 Z
t1i
t
1 ?
W
1
I
LLJ
?
t
t LLJ
1
I
t /
of I i

o - o: '
I
1
1

1
t
1
1

OO .
t
O- I
C,LI _I - -

I
t Z
?
00 0
1 c ?,

C14 -` irr}j Q

i

I ?
r

i

f
I
O C
? I
I
I
O 1
I
I
1
I
I
o
`" 0 "dOdd --d-l C14I ?I co
<DI °,I
N
w
Q
U
N
_J
W
z
U
W
N
I
0
N
+ W
cn
to
D
w
3
Z
J
Z ly
W
w
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-5128)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR1121 TO WEST OF SR1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 55 OF lt(o
SITE PROJECT STATION STRUCTURE FILL IN
IN
WETLANDS
(ha) CUT IN
IN
WETLANDS
(ha) FILL BELOW
SURFACE
WATER
(ha./cu.m.) UNDERCUT
IN
WETLANDS
(cu. M.) TEMPORARY
FILL IN
WETLANDS
(ha./cu.m.) TOTAL
FILL IN
WETLANDS
(cu.m.)
4 27+40 - 29+00 600 RCP 0.276 0.000 0.000 0.013 / 135 11200
5 32+30 - 33+45 450 RCP c 0.698 0.000 0.000 0 38400
6 37+00 750 RCP 0.144 0.000 0.000 0.012/115 14900
7 3+65(ramp A)-5+13(ramp B 600 RCP 0.770 0.012 0.569/34100 0 95700
8 42+70 -L- 600, 750RCP 0.350 0.002 0.000 0.010 / 125 25600
9 46+17 -L- NONE 0.003 0.000 0.000 0 400
10 59+80 -L- NONE 0.005 0.000 0.000 0 100
11 61+50. 62+50 -L- ' ITCHCK. CK 0.527 0.000 0.384 / 1535 0 70100
12 65+20 -L- 600 RCP 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.009 / 140 6200
TOTAL f 2.840 0.014 1 0.953 / 35635 0.044 / 515 262600
* This total includes surface eater areas delineated as wetlands.
NOTE: SITE #11 IS BELOW HEADWATERS, ALL OTHER SITES ARE ABOVE HEADWATERS.
TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 2.840/262600 ha. / cu.m.
TOTAL CUT IN WETLANDS = 0.014 ha.
TOTAL FILL BELOW O.H.W. = 0.953 / 35635 ha. / cu.m.
TOTAL UNDERCUT IN WETLANDS = cu. M.
TOTAL TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.044 / 515 ha. / cu.m.
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAM LET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SRI 121 TO WEST OF SRI 103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 5?, OF ?5t,
SUMMARY OF AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
TRACT
NO. OWNER ADDRESS
O FEDERAL PAPERBOARD COMPANY P.O. BOX 146
SOUTHERN PINES, N.C.
28387
O N.C. NATURAL GAS COMPANY- P.O. BOX 1206
ROCKINGHAM,N.C.
28379
O3 JOHN D. CHALK, BRYAN L. CHALK & 1004 FAYETTEVILLE ROAD
EVON ELIZABETH CHALK ROCKINGHAM,N.C.
28379
40 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT (UNKNOWN)
O5 DOE INC. P.O. BOX 7552
MYRTLE BEACH, S.C.
29577
® DONALD M. DAWKINS AND 125 SLATE ROAD
WIFE PATRICIA S. DAWKINS ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
O7 WAKE STONE CORPORATION P.O. BOX 190
KNIGHTDALE, N.C.
27545
® WILLIAM C. KUBIAK AND WIFE DORIS D. KUBIAK 459 ZION CHURCH ROAD
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
O9 GEORGE H. MADDRY & WIFE RUTH M. MADDRY 203 GARRETT STREET
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
SUMMARY OF AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS
TRACT
NO. OWNER ADDRESS
10 JOEL M. MEGGS AND WIFE LIBBY C. MEGGS 547 ZION CHURCH ROAD
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
11 ROLAND ESTRIDGE AND WIFE AMANDA ESTRIDGE 106 GRENACO ROAD
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
12 FEDERAL PAPERBOARD COMPANY P.O. BOX 146
SOUTHERN PINES,838C.
13 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY P.O. BOX 547
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
14 LAWRENCE McINNIS AND WIFE NANCY M. MciNNIS P.O. BOX 1684
ROCKINGHAM, N.C.
28379
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512B)
US 74 (ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET BYPASS) FROM
EAST OF SR 1121 TO WEST OFF SR 1103
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 58 OF
L.
'N
f'-
U)
N
Lli
V)
Y
N
N
w
Vo

M
N
W
SP \w
X80// WSJ .0 `SQ. 6.
& H yd2j? `
w
? L
#in 4,
w
N
O
N.
LLJ
F -
V)
Q1 ?
W
V)
A'Jy
?t!
w -
t w
F-
J to

Z
_O N
F- ?
Q
F- ?Ln
cr- U} m
Q7
ci- N Lo
cn >-
z - F-
Q'?W(n
Q3:Z -j Z)
F- LD::) F-- Z)
WSL)O Q
0 LL
00
F-OZLq='
ZZ:2woL-
W O = Z O
N U V U 0
a??Wo
F-
p ?Ct W
= Q O
W
W Q- Imo- V)
0
U :D
Z
O
? o
0
C
Q N
U-
O "
_J J
Q
U
W VI
V)
.K)
w

N
600W
PROP. MUMPAL ,
!
3T5W 3GI
RPM
PROP.
GWORAL
RAP
- - - CL •6• RPT ONS
- - EST. 09
EST. 3.3 3M F?
APPROX. WETLANDS U
' LIMITS LL MQNM
ANN
Do PG
60O1M RCP
Lon x U5w x 64m RC6C
SHLAR. BEAM
St dro
l ?.
L-A
® FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS 213 SQ.M. ± PLAN V3 E,W
1:1000
® FILL IN WETLANDS 2015 SQ.M. SCALE
?'
40

56.
AA 1 200 VERT.
APPROX.
WETLANDS
LIMITS
?. PROP. POINT
S= -2.0486/ N-OF GRADE -L REV.-
54-_ Sr 3.0000% __-----.-5-4-
`? ? PVI 72+50.000 ? ? - -'
EL= 54.100 _ _ - _+ -_L9RR SPIKE IN
VC= 300.000 P. POLE *FL85 26 ••?2-
K= 59.41 M LT.
D5= 120 KMH 72+86.000 -L-
-50-
EL= 51.097 . APPROX.
4$.. WETLAA5
LIMITS ? 4$
q6 ?1.5m x 1.5m x 84m RCBC
EXIST. GROUND Q ? -L REV.- SCALE =7 1000 HORIZ.
REV 72+00
PROFILE VIEW
REV
N.C. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 13 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 61 OF I S6 AUGUST 1995
8 133HS 33S 3NI?HOidW CD
Do CO v N O* I co: O; V: N; O +
l0; CD; lD; l0 CO; I Un; U ): U'), m: ? N
1
O I
O
N I
o I
I I
y i
I
I
I d
I ?
I
I E
? E
O
1 un
I M
I
I
i b9b'19 =13
1'obo

0 N r 000'SZ+1 lAd
0
0 0
2
O v' o Y 1
II 1 w
I'"1.
O

pP?prjp0
V1
1

>
Twnc5N i LU
>J>IIN
O.WJY? I
1 O H
I
o O LL
66S'19 =13 00 I ±
000'S6+0 31JAd j p o =
c p o a
0- a.
co Q
Vf / dodpY IR :z
/ +_wh E
ZO op
° co
E
/ 0
a 0
/ >°> It
0
I a?
JYG 0
/ N
/ Q
b91'19
=13
/ cr-
000'59+0 0Ad i
/
/
i

i? N
i H
1= F-
Q
_ ;
/
/

• O O
/ m
I O
O O
N
/ n
I a ..
Z T
I 000 0
O co.I w- v; O:0. 0c): CD: 'v'; N; O O J
ti l0; I w: cD: Qo: a d.n, Ln: U-): Ln; Ln O 0
_ + cn
Ul Z'91) _ AMI 1- 960'£1+09 00d O
=. G. dWVU 000'00+0 10d
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 14 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (.R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 65 OF ISIo AUGUST 1995
00
w
m
IL
m
a
z W
O O
aQ
dCD
ao
CO: I v' cl! O: ao (p r:
CD: Cfl: ?: ui Ln: LC):
21,9'69 =13 '
j =.G. d)4VH L£0'LL+£ 10d
i 'd'0'3 -'/1321 1, k- bl1,'L9+£ IAd
i
i
i
i
i
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
\ zm
a
N LJ
? X
W a
\ G.
\ U
\ E
\ E
o O \
oero 2 \
O-Ogun) 'e I M
N IL
N ?? O 01 -
+-Cj? ??
N f/)
?J> if a I
d W J Y 0 I
I
I
I
ti
ti
LfX
M
O
O
co
.I
co: ca ?• O cd tD v N O
?' CO CD ?? CO 0 Ln 0 Ln-
+
L 133HS 33S 3NllH31dW "
N
F-
2 Q
O O
O N
T
T
T
II
W
J
Q
U
U
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 4 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 66 OF tsc, AUGUST , 1995
68
82-1
66 M RR SPIKE IN
610 HARDWOOD
47 M RT.
82+16.000 -L-
6 4 EL= 66.438
APPROX.
62 WETLAND
LIMITS
60 S= -0.40007 _ _
------.------_---
PVI 82+50.000
58 EL= 6LI00
VC= 125.000
K= 60.10
56 DS= 110 KMH
1200(mm) RCP
54
VV
PROP. POINT 66
OF GRADE -L REV.-
-64.1
1.6800% - -,_ -?'
60
EXIST GROUND -5$
c rE -L REV.- 1350(mm) RCP
IAPPROX.WETLANDI
56
CSJ*VV
-L REV.- PROFILE
STA. 82+00 - 83+40
70 70
APPROX.
68 -WETLANU-
EXIST GROUND LIMITS 68
+
Q RAMP 'C'
66
64 ------' 64
. POINT
6 OFOGR
ADE RAMP 'C' 62
60 60
900 (mm) RCP
3+00
RAMP "C" PROFILE
STA. 3+00 - 4+20
lItuu
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 14 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
SCALE = 1 1000 HORIZ. PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
1 200 VERT. US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 67 OF isto AUGUST , 1995
Ln
t0 O U-)
O In

1 +I
I
i V

I
[1'091
Lc) O
p

Z O
Lo
1 N J O
I ~
Lu
I II
Z
H co
Lo
W
O Ln O j C7
00
f? l0 Qo J .

U') O p
O U-) >
0)
i CO w U) i J O

00'6
I
I Lr)
I ?- i
M I LL.
f"

O Q
u') i
i p

+
I
1
+
, I O
L)
,-
oo
C\j

O 00 Z

O 1 Lo

J
Lr)
I N 1•• N

°z I

I ?>

U p

OS 'S9
cl)

W 1
1
I
N
J
I I
4.
W
Q
at N
t I I
- J
x arl9 I L90' 9 tD
cr 000 6 1 I I
0-
a I
I 1 ca

j I O

U
I CVm 1 - 0
I I N? jU

j
605 9 I ?-
I Fn Z 3_ ZL'b91 U Z
I O: O
O
1

1

I

a
. O
X?
I J
O
I (L U Ir 1
0-
U
.
I In
w? a I w
LJ
I < V) a I Q N
I
1 N 3 ?- I-
I 1 X I 119'£9

t'6a- I

i o -.+
0-
a I
I
+ 1
. H
= >
i I O

co O
O
U)
I +? I
I
Lf ) Lr)
pN , I I I r
I p I i 11
I
1
1 I w
I I J
I

\ Ln U
M O
In
c 0 O Ln
w Lo Ln O Ln 1 O Ln O
cfl w Ln r- w Lo
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 14 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 68 OF15?- AUGUST , 1995
N: O: 00: O: v: N: O

O 00 I cO: .Q-: N: O

0 r- gyp: Qo: (,0

0 0
0
0 o
0 I

N
if
m
O I
i
O
0)(D
o
if M
0 n -
-
' O

11
- It
dWJY
000
00+61 lAd
rn
\
O I
1 i
1 I
1 1
O

° 1
\ 1. '
I °w

0
I ?
1 o
? 1 I IX r
•
fn I \
1 \ v)
I
1 1 X !-
W Q
1
1 ?
I ?
`

d
I
? LL-
Q Ww I g O O I
'- cn
3
?- E
E I ?
I
3 1
T+
x Z' ,n X W_> WO
c oo
a M IQ >W
+ >I-
W
a
a a
D: IN
I W o
z u W 0
I L
a o o aD
re) cc LL
0 W V) I
t: _

/ Of
a_ o J
r Q.
I / 0
O a 0
I +
+ OD
I c0 E /

/ ZZL'69 =l3 co

=.d. driVN +
61'£9+b iod F- r
o uim
=-'A38 tint- Z8'LL+LI 10d
09

N
'
/
z 0'P 0
000'
J+
-9L fl JA 00
144,
/ IL a + Ir)N?O
D_X mtuNCO
/
r
w O uU n
a0
G?.?J]GD
? ? i
.\•
O !
/ o"
?
O r U
O I
'?
h /
/ X F
W Q 1
I
/ O 00: N; O
/

C ! 1`' W:
t0: W: w
N; O: ?; CD; cJ N; O
t0: W: c.0: w
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 1 5 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
SCALE = I: 1000 HORIZ. PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
1:200 VERT. US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 70 OF 1S6 AUGUST 1995
1
O Ln O
r` CD Ln
I ?
I
I
:'ZZ+BI V1S
-130 A-
0
z
a
J
W ?
?m
.:z -A
0
z
a
J
~ N
W ?
X J
0
a
CL
Q
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
t
? I
N 1
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
0
rn
N
N
O +
Ln 00
I
H
W
0
v
I
Ln
N
O
N
Q
+ I
co Q
I
O >0
W ?-
c
u
d- W
Lo
N
I?

N
0 U z u

z Ln
r-
A J O
!- m

Q
W
J CD N
W
3: II
+I z II
+I
z I 0 WHO
? CD
W >0 ?0 + CC)
0
:D Qf >
O
0
> >- N
I F-
J Q Ln
J?
J
J O u- 10
F--
LL
J •?
? W 00
O ~ -I ti
F-
Q
F- Q
F- Q
O F-
V) F- N
N ? <D
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 15 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
SCALE = 1. 500 HORIZ. PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
1:500 VERT. US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 71 OF 15t, AUGUST , 1995
PER 15 F D ',
C
spEaAL DITCH l 1 \ y , \ C
SEE -SECTIONS
(&INA \ 1
LEVYJER
4 OS 3T2 PG 257 I A
_ i
RoDMN L 7 S S +00400 T-
C .POC 84 -
TAL DITCH . W
x/CL IRFL
I ? 1
-J? I `1 1
AT MW I \
® - - - - LT \ \
t DB pLEG SpT E ITTLAND Y
t `? ? 562 Cp .
HARRY L.& ELYN
M
WLSON
DO 716 PG 588 4 IS
APPROX.
WETLA
LIMITS ,
& 1050mm
RCP C F?
CB 3 P .
9 ?\ 'r 4 -Y4 REV.
` 4 -
\ ® P
O .9 'D'
/ i
HAAMPPT?O?N. do SEA
N ?651'!T M CKENZE /
Zy ? JOC RCP DS 672 PC 255 i , .
J
?- 750W RCP ?J ,A o
R ®zcI D
is
i
15
` ` n 60ai HN _ - *?
I !00411/ RCP ORM TAPER,.
9M DRAWCE OUTLET
® ? C' . _ tS F _ ?S ,.(` + a.TERAL V DIT
W ? Tut ? i ..V {
HAMPTON & BEATRICE
MC%PNZE
N 672 PG 255
® CUT/FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS 4,016 SO.M. ±g
® CUT/FILL IN WETLANDS 1000 SQ.'M. +
S I T E 16 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLAN VIEW RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
( SCALE = 1 : 1000 ) US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 72 OF?S6 AUGUST , 1995
33HS SIH1 33S 3NI1H01dIN

Imo: CD\ 'CD: CD: C D

\ ?p
\ O
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
zz
1
0o
tr 1
0 1
wa 1
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 V
I'
i?c
I Q
lam
to
I '
N O
0
a I ?I
1
J
L
0
a i

I

~ /
00p1
0
steal
- 006'Z =13 a m LOW
100.06+0 0and ,

/ O

/ u
!
O:// 00: (D:
f? y ?D: cD:
v-: N:
tD: (.D:
O
O
N

O
O O s
o
q g
P Y
too mo
11 Ih U.,
u U - u
> J > n N
awJYc
O
O
t
OWU =13:-
-'A38 b.l- 9ZI'6b+91 loci.
=.0- 001 Z95'Lb+b loci
I
I
w
0
U
r '
U
a O
z
E
E
O
N
O
o =
O
?0 Y
.P-NO
~ u l? ?
JJu U - n
W J Y 0
I uw-5E+t, IA
I
I
I
\
\
\ a
\ E
\ E
\ O
\\
z p
z a I
c? oo I
? J \
N ?l \
x 1
wa a \
U I
s
U E 1
I
?zatn 9L0
Ion 1
[3 NQ.w i
aQ !
-13 '0 /
1= w /
a 0
/
/
I
£81'69 =13
t 000*98+Z c
1
I E
1
1 oU
olr
\ ? M
\ o'.
CO cD v; N O \ cD N
133HS SIH1 33S 3N1-1H31dW
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 1,6 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PROFILE SCALE =1:1000 HORIZ. RICHMOND COUNTY
1: 200 VER T. PROJECT 6.589001 ( R512C )
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 7.3 OF 151, AUGUST , 1995
O
O
v'

Ln o Ln
r` ti U
I U-)
r` +I +I
I Of
J
U
.
k4
• W
W
M
1
.
' Q Z
J w
CD c?

J
W
H
II Z
Q
II

U
J
LL
?
m
N
Lo
I O -
??
H z +
cr) ?
Lo
i to l0
+
U-) L) (/)
(/) m Q ~ Q

z
fuq

?^
U) =)

of
> H
to

O w

J f-

O

?
N Lr) C)
CD lD
z
J
>
F-

of
bd
?
? Ln
M
O H
,L N
+
; N
+

a
0-
H
I- O H
LL 0
U Q J Q
Vis0O.& 8 Q ; 1
U J cis H 0

M i

I N

W

O

U
0
~

U
` i
v t-
+ O

I
t

U-) I
17.272 O
J Q
°C
i

I N
800*

V J
O O

+ Q
i
0
Q Q
I O 8' O V) OZ 0
?
>
t
I v
-f• 00
c
U -

W
I
I
t M I

Qm Z

-A U

O? p

?..? p 0

O
80 *U t
-
0 N Z w
000-0 7+ O
I
I - U
(L N a
a J
O W Q
o
J I OJ II ?
CD N
w I
W
? ?-
I II
II
X I II Ln
o f 1 I I CV
a I II
CL
< I
I II

11
I
Lr) II
V)
N M
In
ti O
N Ln I t.n O I
U O
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE f.6 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 74 OF 1S(- AUGUST , 1995
c0i (0: v N: O:
rl-: Imo-: r-: co: W:
C0: l0:
U0: C0:
909'69 ='13'
'd-'A3M Ir t- bl8'£5+1, 10d i '

i
i
i
\
a 1
1
a
a I
1
? I
z
w 1
°aa° 1

o °
a
In
it

O

O Ln 0
ao
z . 0 ~ U O
In
00-
M
1

\
0<
\ tr,
1
?

\ N?
1 x f
1 wa
I W
H I
I Lf)
? > I N
1 I
/
I J
H
z
I u- N (
I 0

+ a-
I ix 1=
a
I
U
I W
? E I
I cl)
F I o

1 o Q
= I O

Q
cl)
J
?
j CL y Q
o Q
- Q r
1 U
I ? Ib£'8 j a Z p

I
1
I
0 I I- I "
o o x
O Y
alci
M
11 \
(
I a
J
W I LLJ
I Q V) W
.I
W

O N O I
AO
M? 11 N
O
O
'
2
I
3 LA
I

Ito II

5WJbe0
T

N

I
I X

N
a. I
O ~ 4
1 +
M OW a I NF-
I =>

O I
I OW
>
O
O Z
cV
O O 00
/ - - OOVIZ9
N N V u') U')
/ L1J II I I W
_J W I N - -

C0: q-. N; O:
Imo: I--: Imo-; /
CD"
-: N;
LO: t0: A LL.
O
CL J
Q
V I
I N
I N I i
W
J

61,5'89 75
(/) to
M Ir
u
000'09+Z OAd O Lr) 01 U N
I- t0 l0
SITE 7 N. C. DEPT. OF. TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
TOTAL FILL VOLUME IN WE TLANDS RICHMOND COUNTY
-L REV.- STA 85+54 TO 86+05 US 74 ROCK INGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
RAMP "A" STA. 2+77 TO 3+89 PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
VOLUME = 9,315 CM ± SHEET 76. OF 15(o AUGUST . 1995
0 0
0 0
74 °o ?°o 74
APPROX. co°-? co_.
72 WETLAND mi= °Di=
EXIST. GROUND a -L REV.- cj -??I 72
0-w CLW
70 - -
\ 70
I ?
68
PROP. POINT '
66 OF GRADE -L REV.- - - - - j r1750(mm) ? 66
6q M
RR SPIKE IN RCP 6q
610 PINE ...
58 M LT.
62 87+73.000 -L.- 62
EL= 65.677
REV 87+00
REV 88+00
PROFILE VIEW
SCALE = I: 1000 HORZ.
1:200 VERT.
``O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - \ ------------------
- - _ - - - - - - - - - - -
00 m - -
00
N1 rn
?p O
a.
m +
a0 cs Oc 10 mN N O O M O fn
..: n O
to
4.'
-cam 25 40
-L REV- 88+00
SECTION A-A
SELECTED CROSS SECTION
SCALE = 1: 500 HORIZ.
1:500 VERT.
SITE 8 N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
TOTAL FILL VOLUME IN WETLANDS PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
STA. 87+45 TO 88+43 4170 CM± US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 79 OF 15- AUGUST, 1995
?®
oe gas PTIN05MWs
'B' RP RAP
R. TONS
IT. SM F.F.
6Y-800mm dIP

-MO7*- t"i - - - - - - -
/ OUTLET POPE WAIISER
E-
?t\ A X.
0
U0
TYPE 'A' BASIN
509CM STORAGE REO'D
9154 SURFACE AREA REO'D
LMI SPLLMAY
ESE
E/W- RY®
8 405 PG
548
15,
335top .2 TONS
.M.B SM/FF. /
A
CL 'B' RP RA
EST. 0.9 TON:
EST. 33 SM I
• - _ }O) nn a FU-I. 1
<
!Em"
I
?-- - CF
-_ --
4ft
•
900MM
------cfp e% - -
limg
MS
M/
as .
oO ® r

to 405 Pc tS -
548
F- -gam

PLAN VIEW
TEMP. FILL IN WETLANDS 875 SO.M. ± (SCALE = I : (000)
® FILL IN WETLANDS 840 SO.M. ±
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 19 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 80 OF ISc, AUGUST 1995
88 88
86 86
84 84
PROP. POINT - - - - -
82 OF GRADE -L REV.
S_ 2.9595%
80 80
EXIST. GROUND C (L -L RE V.- 5= 2.9595% J
78
w
LIMITS
W
_76-
co
N
74 52
750(mm) RCP
* 74
70 ccc'n'+
I$M RR SPIKE IN ao
l
152 PINE 70
49 M RT. w
91+67.0
-L-
68 EL= 99 489 68

-L- 92+20
REV 91+00 REV 92+00
PROFILE VIEW
SCALE =1:1000 HORIZ.
1:200 VERT.
85

IDENING 85

o m tip
0
M 00 Mo c~o 0 co co
.
.

80 FOR GR a' 84 ci co C'
2 WIDENING
FOR GR 80

75
\
'LA
- ------------
APPROX.? _
WETL?pp??D -------------- _
-
-------- N
- M1TS- -
75
70
70
-35 -25 0 25 5
REV 91+80
SECTION A-A
SELECTED CROSS SECTION
SCALE =1: 500 HORIZ.
1:500 VERT.
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 19 - DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
TOTAL FILL VOLUME IN WETLANDS PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
STA. 91 +12 TO 92+00 = 4270 CM ± US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 81 OF 15(o AUGUST 1995
S 33S 3NI-1H01"
V Z
133H I
I 1 U+
L01 cn +1
T
co 1 ' 1 co O
I , I O co
1 Z O
1 , I Q
J N
LU Cn
1 ? I ? D
1 / I Z
1 I H <
1 I ?
I ' J W
/ I L o LL Z
I I CL J
z u M J
J Q H L1..
?? Q I , I d v ®®
0
0 1 ,
901
I i
• 1
• 1
a ? I
'I I
aid
S: I r wl
?r t w i?
D BE
! 1 i
pan/I lip I:
?a I I
ILL
? 1 I I I /,
01/
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 20 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 82 15, AUGUST - 1995
l
1
\
1
\

\
1

? t
1
1
1 y
1 1
`
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1 }
1
1
1
1
1
of
1
1
1

1
a 1

1
1
1
1

g
2 1
1
r'?' 1
I

? w
1
Z01
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ;
1 ?
1 °o
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
1
1
1
1
1
11 li
d

1
l
1 I
1
1
?O?MI l
1
I 1
di 1

0 k
'^ N` 1 1 1 1
??? 1 Ll
1
1` ? L
N 1 `\
\ \` I /
>3
C z 133HS 33S 3NI3HO -L"
1
i
l
1
N
O
Z
Q
J
W D
Z
Q
Z --1
J W
LL Z
W J
:2 J_
LL) I- LL
O
O
? O
W --
H -
> II
Z Ld
I Q J
J Q
W DLr N
I •? NN v
?WW
W ?
I
1 y YW
1
_J
3
213
d ,
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 20 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
(RICHMOND C 0 N T . COUNTY
PROJECT 6.5$9001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 83 OF 1S(- AUGUST . 1995
CD IZT- N O (X), LD Q N / Q O
m. m rn Off: (X> CO w, w ? w Q .

+

r
I Q
-
I
I
J

1
r
?
?
/
/
i

a 1
n. J /
I
I

? W ¢
r H p
x w
1
I
>
O

>
>
-,j CD
C)
o ? ? o ?n Q
L u N
N / ow
WW?o? ?- ..

h CL (L

+
cr, 00
NIA?
Q

H

r
/
/ It
groOOJ -
II

J
Z /
/ J
O LLI
J ..
W

0- -cc Q
U
o % c
ao /

/ J

/
/ p
j

/ N
/ X
W

/
1 Q
1 Q
1 +
/
/ Lf)
/ Q

c v C)r. ar la. v: 011 Cy J
cn m M. vx ca. ao: aa, m 03
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 20 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 84 OF 15L, AUGUST , 1995
o In o m o to
m c0 co o m m 00
Ln

Z I
I
-o ti i
,
N I

I
In I

-° I
0 I
v
N ,
1
I
I
I ?
,
,

b8Z'8 I
1
r ,
,
I
000.6 J t:i 000.6 1

1 ? I
;5 -a co I
cli ? Q ? 1
99[' L8 I + ZZO.68 j
O
Z
ID I
I O I- I
I
I U
-1W 1
I
?SZ'8 I (n b6'68 I
)00'6 ?
I 00'6- I
,
I
1

o 1

j
a
i
1 ?
2
t
CL a
J
1
I
I
I Q I
r
I
I
0
°OO
Lr)
N
Q
O ?
O Q
O +z
Lo
O
J U
W
N
z
O
H
H
U
W
Cn
U)
O
OC
W
U
Li

I I to
N Z ?
Z? I Ln
N
I
N
W
OC j D O cJ I
3 u. ?/? "i
VJ I--
IX

.- o ? O
_ l1J
>
I 04 ? M O

I •. ? ao
r 0
Lo O
Lo
I 1
1
1 I
I T r,

I
? II
I I Lu
?
r O r o Q

O U-)
O
l
tin O lf) O C-)
m 00 00 m m 00 00
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 20 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICfIMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
TOTAL FILL VOLUME IN WETLANDS
STA. 105+35 To 1 os+oo = 17, 22o CM ± US 74 ROCKI NGHAM / HAMLET BYPAS S
SHEET 85 OF 15(, AUGUST 1995
41t ///',11' I
Zo / APPROX.
WETLAND
?? • ? ? LIMITS '
C/O JOIN DOCKOW 9?, r
00 626 PC 207
l 1 RIP RAP
WS7L,F.
eOWA© ?c \
CAROtI{A dvtS1ON
WOODLAND$
DO 767 PQ 231
B Rp RAP
EST. T
I ONS ^ '
EST. SN F.F. `_V
-RAPE STAID Il
I~

-\3LOP? S'FAAE? -
3TSMN RCP
201
49
- !LOPE STA% LJE - - - 3 C ?
C/o Jam Doom
OG en PC 20T
, APPROX.
// - EST. WTI
EST. SN
TLAND
LDAfTS
r LL IRP RAP U
F - - - - - -SLOPE STAN UE - - -
GQ? ('-E--E-E--- 'i
A
m Cam= / I
1 _?'? armi
0 ` muff WOOOLANDS?I S
i I 00 767 PC 231
.
y \ m
m ? ?f
I ?
LE-EE-?---
E EJ
.O
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS7 SQ.M. ±
[E]FILL IN WETLANDS 4,830 SQ.M.
PLAN VIEW
SCALE 1:1000
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 21 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 86 OF ?Sl- AUGUST , 1995
86
.8.6.
84
84
82
82
APpa?TLANQ PRQ4 PROP. POINT .
OF GRADE -L-
80 LIMITS 80
7 6 -2.7600t = 7 6_
EXIST. GROUND D -L-
3-2.7M X 1.5M X 61M RCBC _
^/ \ -0 -- __ - 72.
IM RR SPIKE IN PVI 11+00.000
457 PINE
7Q 47 M LT. EL= 76.140
70
'
109+97.000 -L- VC=
300.000

EL= 75.619 K= 70.48
68 DS= 110 KMH
.6.8_
110 60 III+00 III 40 111 4-80
PROFILE VIEW
SCALE = 1: 1000 HORIZ.
APPROX. o o WETLAND a 1 : 200 VERT. LIMITS
°oo co 0000
80 FOR GR .'? 8:1 `8.26:1 ti FOR DEMING GR 80
.....
75 z?
75
--- -------------------------------------------
1.834 70
70CLASS IRIPRAP -25 0 25
L 111+00
SECTION A-A
SELECTED CROSS SECTION
SCALE = 1: 500 HORIZ.
1:500 VERT.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE 21 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
TOTAL FILL VOLUME IN WETLANDS PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C )
STA. 110+66 TO 111+43 = 21,700 CM ± US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS = 83 CM + SHEET 87 OF 15(o AUGUST 1995
A
CATANBA lE75PRNT
DB 570 FC X91 Co. `? \ B ®MART
v ?l DO 542l??,96 LATE 'r DITCH
¦ia a RIP RAP

--- \ --------------------
, \ l4'S

4SONM FtCfl\ r
{- 2101

- ----- a nr 300w a
EST. 0.9 TONS t??µ
---??_ \- - - - 33SMFF
AA
-
BERN MART
SA
NDERS
\ `?

® FILL DB
542
496
IN WETLANDS A \
PLAN VIEW
3490 SQ.M. ±
SCALE 1:1000

APPROX. W T AND
.8-6 LIMITS
4
N
V

84 C4
.8.4_

82 ' J
W
_ 8-2-
so --------------- --
8°
--------
-------
78 ---- -7-8=
EXIST. GROUND Q -L-761
124+00 125+00
PROFILE VIEW
SCALE = I: 1000 HORIZ.
1:200 VERT.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 22 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 88 OF 15? AUGUST
1995
,
3G1 - . W v - {-
V RP RAP
: 33..39 sm TONS
p?

/

A

M T
6 1
FUNNM GRAN
f/E1DOW

- T.
F - - --------------
W 1 1
T

W r
767 PG 22W
W
BERM SA 5Y MARY I k '
D8 512 PC 196
E NI WETLAND
-E-E-/ LAIRS -,,,,,,?
h PAN IW
SCALE 1:1000
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS = 210 SQ.M. +
® FILL IN WETLANDS = 9,355 SQ.M. ±
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SITE 23 RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 90. OF isco AUGUST
1995
,
88
88
86 11- „? L-HryU o
LIMI
N 86
+
84 PROP. POINT N
OF GRADE -L-
CL > ?? 84
82 \
S= 2.27037 82
0
S-- -2.00007 S= 2.27031 .80
78
PVI 126+00.000 78
EL= 79.740
VC= 250.000
?E2 K= 58.55 EXIST. GROUND o 7W3 -2.7M X 1.5M X 69.5M RCBC 76
DS= 110 KMH _ _ _
74 --------------- ,---------
72 72
70 7n
126+00
127+00
PROFILE VIEW
SCALE =1: 1000 HORIZ.
1:200 VERT.
8
7
7
APPROX. WETLAND LIMITS
5 °M N O M
8
FOREGR ° ° IQENING $ 5
0 ' 8;1 8:1 co OR GR
00HW ?,y 80
DEPTH=0.35 M±
5
------------------------------------------- --- 75
0 -35 -25 n 70
v L J J
L 126+60
SECTION A-A
SELECTED CROSS SECTION
SCALE = I: 500 HORIZ.
1:500 VERT.
SITE 23 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
FILL VOLUME IN WETLANDS PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
STA. 125+94 TO 127+48 = 55,040 CM + US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
FILL BELOW SURFACE WATERS = 75 CM +
- SHEET 91 OF 15L AUGUST 1995
W --
"N m
`? _ '" TERAL 0.9M BASE DfTN
11/ Q-'B' RIPRAP
WOODS 47 - -
APPROX. _
LIMITS N _ CAROLINA 'DIVISION M
. 1 N 0.r WOODLANDS
\ DB 767 PG 231
op i

I?WETLAOND
so
30pU a -
FUNNEL DRAM ,
W/ELSOW 47
CAROLINA ID VISION
CL 'I RP RAP WOODLANDS
EST. M TONS DB 767 PG 231
EST. 13 SM F.F.
'F 0. 'B' RP RAP
BOWATER INC. ? ?? ICL TONS
CAROLINA DIVISION f
` EST. 33 SM F.F.
D8 T67 'PG 231 \ t W \
PLAN VIEW
SCALE 1:1000 \
92
90
88
86
S= 2.2703%
PROP. POINT
OF GRADE -L-
92
90
88
86I
-84
g
-84
82.
82
80
`?. 80
78 PROFILE VIEW -------------- -`' 78
SCALE = 1: 1000 HORIZ. `
1:200 VERT. 1050(mm) RCP EXIST. GROUND a -L-
76 CL IV 7r-
130+00 131+00 '
SITE 2? N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
FILL BELOW SURFACE = 120 SO.M.RICHMOND COUNTY
WATERS PROJECT 6.589001 (R512C)
® FILL IN WETLANDS = 5,770 SO.M.± US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 92 OF iS(, AUGUST , 1995
O
J
m >
a

>

o >

< >

to W

m W

m W

0m W

m W

m W

m W

co W

m
p Q Q Q Q .
Q Q Q Q
m
Q
2.
U

W I
2

J N 9n N Q M O f- N p to o c N ti

Q N

O

:

O

a;

v

N

N
~

N O N

M
l
M7

l- In QI
Y
K
O p M v M
W O
U
F

0 V1 O Fn
O e4
Y co
N
0
N
0
N
o
1!7
l
a z o
w J 0 0
O O O 0 O
U.

?. _
Q
N
\ 400 in O 1"
M tN0 Go
O O
N co
Q v
M M
O! ti
N p
1A
F O O O O O O O O O O O O v
U
N

N O O t0

} N ± + (n

N N N

+ + ? to

t t
In
Y
+
-
N
+
.
IA

t0

O

N
707070?????? <O
N N QIA <ori Qp
~
+7 V) N y Qt00
VI 4 Mm1 Qp-
N t
N <? Q O
t H r
GO
<+R
H m <O
} M
+
? O
+ QQ
-+ MP
N P m
NP
N} c+O
N+ N
J
1.. M
v.
!b
1 1 M
N M tom N < O
- <- Q N < N < M FQ•
1 p
l- 0 m0 V O
1.- t-
WH j0
W 1- UO V O
1- Q p 1
O
1-
H I
O
> t
WO h-
Uf0
NO
NO F--
Vf0 ?-
'A0 p
H
0
z 2 O .? W
W
C t
?
K 1~ 1 1
J 1~
J 1~
J

1
-K
J
C
Ir
Y
/
O
J

J
1

J
1

J

J

J
rn t7 to
_ lD I? of Cl 0 N rr, Q
- - - - N N N N N
N. C. DEPT. F TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SUMMARY REPORT RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 T (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 94 OF!jtc AUGUST
1995
,
PARCEL

NO. OWNER(S) -
DB PG
ADDRESS
1 L.L.MCINNIS P.O. BOX 1684
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
18 VICKY J. BRIDGES 758-753 264 SYCAMORE LANE
LAURINBURG, NC 28352
23 MURRY L. DEBERRY 636-24 RTE I BOX 105
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
24 INA LEVINER 372-257 RTE I BOX 84
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
25 INA LEVINER 314-507 RTE I BOX 84
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
26 HARRY L. & ELYN RTE I BOX :85
WILSON 716-588 ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
35 M.A. HAZEL
363-90 RTE I BOX 83
DAVIS ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
36 HENRY C. THOMAS 332-299 2312 FOREST DRIVE
CAMDEN, SC 29020
37 HENRY C. THOMAS 405-548 2312 FOREST DRIVE
CAMDEN, SC 29020
39 JOHN W. THOMAS 111 548-244 481 U.S. HWY I. SOUTH
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
46 ELEN DOCKERY EST. 626-207 6300 N.OCEAN BLVD
MYRTLE BEACH
'

BOWATER , INC. ;Q 29572
47 CAROLINA DIVISION
WQQnlAwn 767-231 CALHOUN, TENN 37309
CATAWBA
49 NEWSPRINT CO. 570-491 CALHOUN, TENN 37309
50 BERNIE MARY
SANDERS 1212 ROBERDEL RD.
542-496 ROCKINGHAM,NC 28379
69 JOHN W. THOMAS 652-669 481 U.S. HWY I. SOUTH
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION

RIPARIAN
LANDOWNERS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RIC
HMON D COUNTY
PROJECT 6.58 9001 (R512C)
US 74 ROCKINGHAM / HAMLET BYPASS
SHEET 95 OF?S?- AUGUST
1995
,
1
11 t
/
10 I
Ansonnllt ..
,11 ,,g\!s fill"If. R
0 AN II Fll,
jateiOMarsnvdle Peaenund . .nesrnle 1
Wade SOor ,-r?: I / 6
I A-, N 5 X80 N Oe?"j
WMte Slore. 00 I r5 9 Cador
omen ?•,
I1 ' l ? i ti'
1 ay \
11 S.G. l Ill •l
y M, Cloth AP PROX I MATE AR
6 68 ' 66 SHOWN BELOWill
Cheraw'*
66? 1 I lb
?•%- .. . I Lyi --
1,- l., nn -.
APPROXIMATE. Sr-ALE-
I
O KI LOMSTER5 I O
dtyNciYnt3 - •??
H_0 K _
Scale of Miles
0 5 10 20 30
0 10 20 30 40 40
Scale of Kilometers
One Inch equals aolxoarmaleW 13 mites and aff-i-illy 21 kilts-lens.
NORTH CAROLINA OCPARTMENT OF TRANZPORTATION
D i V - ON OF H: GHPIAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.3005D1T in-5;20)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROC:CINGHA.',: HAMLET CYPA=
FROM 0.6 Klu WEST OF SR 1002 '
TO 6.0 Kin CAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AL SHOVIN
SHE CT 96 OF I` JULY 1303

• ?I SI •?

o J
S
o?m° ° OO"`oSy ty71

u
??
0 N gg1 WZ?
S o
SR 1 O
zz r ZA' - p?. ?J " W
e
w t z
!? M
m w >
z m

O
m m
I
U +
+
a^
0 ,,
oy ee6
g, r
0 N
w

O m
?m
U m
m
cr N
~ +
En 17,
z
U
H
• O
m

J
I
I
W

OO+ogl r

•
10
`N
?O
ON
o

?O
.
LL-
w
1O
• m.
z m Q

N !
?
H Q
N H
0 N
u 1
z5 ,
w Y
m ,
_
M
ors+s6 r
?p NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR T:fiCNT OF TRAN;.PORTitT I ON
F DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ti o? R I CHrZOND COUNTY
¢ U6

w
I- in t`•).-m.
i-
"

` m.
(n
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAWL
ET G'!PA35
^?
cn O
o L1J FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 700 2
F ^ ^
-:a: ` p TO 0.0 Km EAST OF CR 1025
.z.. z( Q
G t in 3

MW m ?zw .
SCALE AS SHOWN
O ?SLI
SHEET 97 OF
JULY 1095

b1s 71V !
ohm`.
N \
U m'
7 O
I +
cr co
+
~
z U)
Z
C)
O O UN
z
vl „ y + L3 }
+591 Q m
M
" NC 177 ?-Y4-
a
m U CV
M I ?' M
I ?
m Q o
o m v 1- CD
m o cV
U ++ I
V) a
u N I
o v
z r 00+091
Z =
>i
00+SS1 I'- J
J ?
I ?
(V 1'! (??l yW
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGH1'IAYS
R;CKNIONO COUNTY
6:3090017 (R-5120)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCICINGHA)' HAMLET CYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1792
TO 0.6 Km EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE ASS SHOWN
SHEET 98 OF '5b JULY 1995

M
m
m
CD

WZ? m
., Z
? U 1- Lr)
m m ID _
a, M
W N Rl M
^
O
I- U)
v
(
¢ Z Ib M
.
<1 J

.
.
1- 0
Lc)
7
v) U (nj f
Z Z 1 ^ U) O
J
W W Z W
y

?
s .

00+00

o m
-? U (m0
K V
N
Z U ¢
In;
L
0
Z '
(D
1
O
•W ' dl ?A
0 SIR 1825 -YG--
? RT ROAD
R
----
---? PO
AI

g
Q)
N Z
0 Q
•U

? H
to
Z
0
Q O
U ¢
H
K
O
C1 Z V1
\ W
m
1
\
Q Q
N
G? 5 w NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT;ON
9 N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY '
?`S,\\ bO? ..\nJJ G.5090017 (R-5i2D)
\y/y ?fb I\ PROPOSED U.G. 74, ROCK INGHA61 XA,4LET SYPASS
FRO14 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1302
V' TO 0.G Knt EAST OF SR 1025
yJ ?`rJ
? 0"!N
„TALC A.. off
SHEET 97 OF ??? JULY 1905
79Tw- (2+9.34 71I ti
I •JIIXXJ •L- ,? q
* I .. ? rL nJ t ?
* g.- SlITE? v
92 500 •L• Ad . '?, WOODS to
OlXb `T- r229E,S rri_ ? • . ?.. ?'' ? ? y?
I?
\ \
.E w iDS \ * •00Li0? •L• .0=00 •L- DENSE WOODS
1L J JlJ ?' \'•?\ pl y J In In m
\\ S 1 DRAIN 0.159 PR Cl. /M '? '? L1 n
•92S0J r
ADND
n * • \ CLASS 8 • •r ?bG?
ry ,\ . RIP RAP P4y??.J: \ * C: .
Y• '\ J;,• CLASS R!P
'O RU'
\ F SLOE STATES UNF. F ? . ur[AnL
?•-•-• yJ STO..ILt?nn
CLASS 'r RIP RAP + ?1 N FUNNEL
I, dlNx
? k 25?
,
\ :I/ 71"p
N zl ^ :.i l .T P /
NI N1 wcrG"O UUA•
i
WETLAND Uua
?97.b• /
ry ?7? N1
t-
AN LfRJ£R ':syti, 1 •/'7'-'T-']"-T?--1-1- 1----1-t
20l
M
7
W
F 9.1
?£?N, 1
S ! 1 •
* CLASS T" ?'?•" w -0= •L• ]C
RIP RM .•s-'iLS. •`1• p BrJJ
DENSE WOODS •Q7LXV •[• N
,733+ f 4 fl) 60.6 1193 ?e 111 b
mmo •o-
?Qaro [ * s r r nJ
HENRY S"6tgv t;
•L?-3r ru
' O DENSE WOODS Q 1,
QL3LLi7 C• SwAUP ch In (i
W 3 rlJ ??++
ti ?
sires /JO 25 ". 66 a
-?`Y I DENS i ES L.lr T LA\lC-?' •
NORTH CAROLINA OEPARTM.ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION H I CH:AYS
DEMOTE S 1-ILL Ii\l l•.lf: J LfaNUS r„C Hti:cvD COUNTY
•'.'w-I 0.500001T iR-5120)
• DENOTES EXCAVAFICI I IN) 1,] i LA1\105 PROPOSED U.C. 74, ROCKINGHA6: HAMLET CYPACS
FROM 0.0 Km WEC7 OF SR 1902
?X DENOTES FILL 3E 1-DW SLIRrAGE WATER To 0.6 Km EAST OF CP. 023
14ORI70N7AL SLALE SCALE AS SH011N
_ J
SHCCT IOO OF IJL JULY 1005
120 m
°I p
Z
w?
of
w
t7
v
L
lJ
4
a
O
a
a
J

\n
U
Z
Q
J
r
ul
3
w
Q
w

i
t
In
NJ

O-

S LL1
O '-
I n
V +
'
CJ

I
r"/sn'I I a
r
J
1Y1
Q
Z
V)
X
?t
N
P
O
K
a
j.
r ? F .F
w `v
Q UJ
Z ?(C J W

v
VI
1
W

F-

z
Q
0
O J O

o / J
V 71
WA
L4
J)
IS
Q

Ql
J
o_ t
N ?? Y
V
+ 3
In ?
0 ---t}(' -
N
-?
i ?
i N
O
5 )
E
w i
J
??II
o? ° o
r f
5 ? I `f
cf
a z I = ?
u?l
w
w
J
J
Q ?O
10
N
'O
n
• W 'n w
o o. F-
•? u1
e w •?.
L ? u
J = ?
3 I 7 J1
o CJ
Q j v!
J J ?'
3 ` •x
N + LL
® ?).( W W W W
(1 Z O O z
cr rr W ul W W
ad C, 0 U L 0
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHCIAYS
V9 t RICHMOND COUNTY
V) .6.509001,
iR-512D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HA.-.'.LET CYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1992
TO 0.6 Ktn EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET IOI OF ESL JULY 1995
c u+?d?°I L.P?. SM 171-I O - /
r0 °
c /
. SiTE:26S .°rt?
Coe-
f wr
.g
F OAS X
v
• .ita• v4? ?s yc
.RAMP. C- SC STA J•&? ?
Q
4d I PROP.GRAOE RAMP G IF EDGE WE-fLAN1o'5. la
CV
Q V° EDGE W E"TLAf l D5
PROP X50 ti(.F ?
NG
..? I1 I t ? ? NG? ?2
I I
3-r00 3+2D 3+40 3- -w 3+QD 4-00 A-+20 4?40
4+ZO RAm") G
5y- ' 90° .SECT I DKI ,, 4 _ B„
? EDCGI:. WF;ft.ANfYj
4:I 7YR Z I'T ?. SS
750aLP GLW.)=
ea
Pd1.
(aD 40 ZD O Zo 4c,
foO
e`,r I DE-ND-1 ES WtTLANC.'.
NORTH CAROLI
ID:PARTASENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DENDTES FILL IN L.IEt LANDS H
DIVISION OF GhIiAYZ;
R I cH1.IOND COUNTY
•?? .
• -
DEnIoTES
EXCAVA i ION IN I^IETLANOS
G.50900IT. (R-512D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM Y.AIsILPT CYPAGS
FROM 0.0 Km WEST OF SR 1002
' TO 0.G Km EAST OF SR 1029
HORIZ ONITAL SLALE VEPM(,AL SLALE SCALE AS SHOWN
- i - - SHEET IOC OF lSlc JULY 1995

A'?x
Pl
r 0?59;?
?. -
ZO 10 0 20m 8 0 9m

i
C

017-
E DGE
WETLANDS
A4_

4
E,eNE?T l?io,e?elsoN??,. ?-
32-
PROP.GRADL RAMP D 1 $a
UN
'7( I F-R J -r •L?lf,,
UNOERGLJT-/
4+50 4+IoD 4+4D 4+2D 4+00 5+09)
• ® pENO-fES uNDERGuT
DENO i ES 1..IrTLAi\IL`5
:?/C LG! DE N UT E S ?= 1 L L 11\1 k) E i LA N) D S
DE >\i OT E S E X GAvA i ION 11-,i WE-T LA hi DS
DENOTES F )LL BE!-DW SL)ReAGE. WATER
?-tor%tzDLITAL SCALE VEPF: ILAL SLALE
s
3h
_
20 10
0 r
_
i?
20++ $ 0
>3m
j EDGE
W ETLAN DS
SD
GNU ' .
/ ?L1
II l
3 + 60 34,4D
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA71ON
OIVISION OF HIGHVIAYG
RICHMONO COUNTY
G.300001T (A-512D) _
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET CYPAS
FROM 10.6 Km VIEST OF SA 1002
TO 0.0 Km EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOVIN
SHEET 103 OF 1?S1o JULY 1005

N
J
?? I
'
\ ar
N? ? ? \
1

/

000,

\ ?
\ \
\

\ \ 5
\ S

-x '? \ \ > 7

O ? ? \ 31
a
O ? J ? fi

I

(
I
00+g91
m?
I
I
r''? l D NOTES L.II?LAt?IC?,
DE-INDTE'-,- Fii-L )N! WE) LP%NIDS
'. e [DEMOTES EXCAVA T )O\I tN VIE.-t LANDS
CEND I •ES F) LL BEL DW SURD :AGE. klA T ER
4-IORIZDr.ITAL SLALE VE..FII IC Al- :?,LALE
?A 10 0 20m S 4 O S m
M W
? o
y
o
-< c?
w -j
LLI

a

1

_
3
.7&\\ IQ

0
Q
K

O
a
?
w
O
Z
/ a
dl
D'
/? v N
? Z z
W
Z
{ d -?
? o
.00
( II I ?+
NORTH CAROLINA DLPARTt6ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIV(SIGN OF HIGHVIAYS
Fit CHM ND COUNTY '
G.309001T (R-5i2D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKiNGHAM, HANILET CYPAG
FROM. 0.6 Km VIEST OF SP. :002 '
TO 0.G Km EAST OF SR 5025
SCALD AL SHOWN
SHErT K)40 F 15Io DULY .,DDs
C
f
a
CL

_:?51 SrAt'ES (.ME
J
PROP. GRADE
RAMP A -
90
1 EDGE WE-1 LANDS Z
86 ? ?
NG? ? ?
SZ_ \?
_jc
78 _ 1 1 ( UNOER.C UT L01 L Qom/ L
44W a-rAo 4+ZD 4+00 3?r?0
yU, W I DENO i ES WF-7LAN105
/C_CLI DE`!DTES 1=1LL i1\1 WE i LANDS
o' DENOTES EXGAVA' lOtJ IN b-lE-fLAICI05
DENOTES F)LL BELOW SURPAGE WATER
WORIZOr.IrAL SLALE VE.RI ILAI. SLALE
zo I 0 Zom 9 4 0 9m
O
O
cy)
? sr
® DENOTE5 UNDERCUT -??
3.02-13
EDGE - gb
WETLANDS
SZ
NG (?
r
1.60 3+40 S +LD 3 tC0
NGRTH CAROLINA DEPARTMiENT OF TRANSPORTATION
D;VISION OF H:GHCIAYZ
RICH(dOND COUNTY
6.503GCiT (R-5i2D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74. ROCKINGHAM HAWLET CYPASS
FAGM C.u Km VIEST OF SR 1302
TC 0.6 K. EAST OF CR 1025
SCALE AS SHOWN
..:dEET!05OF 1?1° JULY 1905
RAMP D ?.
STA. 4 fo1.5 SEC ;-l I ON G - G
SKEW 107°
QS
2: 17YP. 4:1 'iYP.
1500 PCP UA55-M HI HOWL

? ?
8? .
unloEn,GUr
?'? I I I 1 J 1 i 7?
60 QO 20 O ZO .40 (00
r
1(05+9 4.0-L- SECTION D- D
5KF-W q0'

4:1'.YP. A:I '7YP.
Lctn5514 .
1500
$L p ? .
NG

? • '>?+?r -
81:0
UNS)EKWT 4
60 40 ti0 20 X410 610
3+60 PAMP A
QQ 5K4W 70°
"
'
SECTION
E-E
sk 4:1 T,(P Z: I NP. ?!¢
1500RGP GIA551Q W1 HOW L
? NG ?nIG ?

a
?
)-UNDERG?.I'i'
7-6
BEf>
'74 610 4 b io 20 46 610
?5 r TE 2-7
DENOTES UNDERCUT

Y?X DE-NC i ES L.IL-TLA.WCS
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
IVISION OF HIGHPIAYZ
O
DENOTES h1LL i>\l WET LANDS
RICHMOND COUNTY
'.:- DF- \IOTES EXCAWA 1 ON IN WE-rL.AtiIDS 5.599GDtT cR-3120l
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET CYPASS
DENOTES F)LL BEI.-DW SLlReAGE WATER FROM D.G Km T O of SR 1092
F.0 ROM K. EAST OF sR 1025
1-10RIZOn1TAL St-ALE VEP: IGAI 5LALE
SCALE AC SHOWN
SHEETIG6 OF `5?0 JULY 1995

20 10 .O zom 8 0 8m
? F1L?' MoT?21 soil
PAOP.RM P
N.r 'G
Y HEAD DITCH T
LATE
c CLASS •B !P .w ?S •6 NP R.W LAIERK YdICH !\ YLY7CH CLASS •[T R/P RAP 1 / . _-
y' 3 LATERAL"
YDITCH 'CLASS '[TRIP RAP WGlM WJY.FEACE
jj :
.•( SHXLDER BERM GUTTER i
fl
P

Vr 20 Y£ r/
PAV£ CH
wE7tAH0 tun
- L-
W£
UYlf J

BEGUN W-W. F£ACE
S)TE 21e

Sl0?E ST?ES?NE .? ?- ? ?•
-n
CLASS -V w
•B'R!P R.W
yC uc _ 1 yL
T.
W1-Y I DENO i ES WET LA N1 D`;,
0? DENOTES FILL IN WE-) LANDS
1-IDRIZDMTAL SLAT-a
pt? T-
ZO 10 0 20m
NORTH CAROLINA DCPARTM,ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
G.500001T (R-5120)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km VEST OF SR 1902
TO 0.6 Km EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOV)N
SHEET10 7 OF i5 JULY 1095

PRDP. /.r.AEyE - L- gg
@A EDGE WETLAW05 s EDG1: WEiLAWD6 gs?
ILD
8f2
PROP. 450 RCP. 'N cx
-76
I
r- LJNOeRcuf
I I I I T
I i I I ?
1'71+(00 I'71+$0 .172+00 I'124zo •1'72-14o 172+60 172+g0 173+00

aa
bo
n
5 i T G- al
x? I KENO i ES lNlE7LANG5
DENOTES FILL IN1 WE-1 LAND5
DEN07E5 LINDERGLI i
HORIZONTAL. SCALE VERTICAL. SCALE
20 10 0 20m s 0 m
F- F-
50 PGp UA55=
OrKCu T
!aa
9A
Q2
IA
72.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
5.500001T (R-5120)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET CYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1002
TO C.G Km EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOWN
:.HEETI06 OF 15G JULY 1905

iJ
z
Q
88 - EI
86 -
8Z -
78 _
NG? /
74 -
72 _. I I
172+60
W>:Tt?NDS
PROP, GRAO1: -L-
_ qO
-86
E IAIfiTLAND5 _ $Z
- 78
NG
- 74
r//1?UN(7E
!f? I I I I 72
173+40 1"73«60 1?3+60 174roo
1 I t
172teo 173+00 1"13+2,0
DENOTES U??iDERGLIT
?Y 1:Y I DE.NOTES WETLAMD5
?70 DENOTES r- IL.L IN WE"f LANDS
HORIZQMTAI- SCALE VERTICAL 5(-A1-E
20 10 O 2OM 0 8m
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRAN&PORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYZ
RICHMOND COUNTY
G.300001T (R-312D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM. HAiv1LiT PYPAGS
FROM Z.G Km WEST OF SR 1002
TO 0.G Kri EAST OF SR 1023
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 109 OF Ibto ULl' 1003
* I
KEL
• werU"'o *
UYa L.
(fl ? (f l
P ' * END UA ^ yr
W.W.FEMC
mss- PONO .
/ 14'00.. ''-
S(A^£ STAKCS (?7/E ,CUSS
Flip
1 * R E N
8 0 ?
.I W
Y
Q
Jl?
ISPECIA /
_
\•DTCN / ----- _- 1
\\ ` r RLT A^' Av REYf EN0
"P
\ c
.20
p (fl .\
GIN / /A
r-?`-f--9-Tfb
-Y6- AC Sfq t3?6.?W --?
L SS
I F- -
FWWE u h BEGIN
a ca R?iwo W1r.FENCE
Q Y. s / f UY L ORNN
N qn n
•r6• POT STA 1
A -113'.36' 26.5
w
y?ptflED a
P-to all,
i ?1\ . END e BEGIN WX
z? prcH W'r,FE , as = a' FED
h Lo.
0
ALEX ?'ID/Z215o? \\ ? ?_ ? • n ??°l(ELT .. = S \ T ? ? _
5lDPE STNC£S USE
?C
5 rrL 2 9 `\ '' \
CAS •a Rip RAP
C1A .a 'up RAP _
PPJP.RM• ?•: ••
•38f ?? B8 (I) 50000 -L I/
103 (fl BASE
/ "L ORcN
PROP, GRADE - L- Sb
-1.6800 ;6 .
EDGE
WE7LAND5 Z EDGE
W ETLAND5
7-& NG
PROP..750 RCP
N G

I I I I ' I I I
174+00 174+ZO 174-r 4o 174460 174400 176+00 175+20 175+40 175+60

y ' NORTH OAROL114A DEPARTMCNT OF TRANSPGRTATION
SY `w. I DE.NIO i ES 1..IE7L AWDS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYG

DENOTES
F-11-L
11\1 l.lE J Lf-\NiDS RICHMOND COUNTY
?ooa?1T cR-s;zol
• _..._.... __.._... . ._ _._ .___ _ PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHALI HAMLET 3YPAGo
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1992
TO 0.G K1a EAST OF SR 1&25
W0F,IZDr\I rAL SCALE VF.Ri1LAl :5L.ALE
SCALE AS SHOWN

"SI'c
SHE CT I 10
OF
JU- Y 1995
20 10 0 ZOm E3 4- 0 8cn
52
Ak
PeZ 2: I TYti?
70
-14 BED?? -
UNMRCUT
'TO
I I I
60 40 20
17?54 19
5r,S W 72° gQ
SECT 10K) C - a
2:1 iY P, 82
105 %HA W L557Y
w ?a
NG
BED 7A
ZQ
I I I
20 40 60
174+g,?-r,.- slcEw qo°
g4 WE7LANDS SECT IoN H - H

A
2
7 150 RC,V UA65.$

7!o NG
2k.
EV ------------- ?1?JJ(?
72 B
BED Z?c

I I I I I 1 I
I
60 40 20 0 20 4.0 60
1 TE D.°1
DEN07E5 UNDERGLI i
?Y I DE.NO 7 ES Wf-7LAN106
NORTH CAROLINA 0CPARTn1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEI`lDTES FILL ]KI.WE i LA NI DS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
R I CHNIOND COUNTY
5.509001T (R-512D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCI:;NGHAM HAMLET CYPASS
- FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1092
TO 0.G Km EAST OF 3R 1025
F-IORIZDNI7AL SLALE VERTICAL SOLE
SCALE AS SHOWN
?. SHEET I I I OF I'S6 JULY 1905
20 10 0 20m S 0 ST
8.z
7A
74
ffi
z>?
PROP.GRAOE -L- I
EDGE WETLANDS
17b+DD 17(o#20 176+,10 1'
'O.G605%.
- ------------
EDGE WvLAnIDS Z$
Ufx
-PROP.b00RGP_-------------?-
i 1 ? I 1?
+(o0 176+gD 177+00 177+W 177+40
EDGE WETLAh1OS 176+ W-L-- SKEW 1410°
SECT 01A I - I„
2: I TYP I`-T y.
600 R -P GLA55=
??G .? - _ _ Z?L-
' ? NCa .
711
60 40 Z!0 O Zo AD 610
?Y1? I DENO i ES I..IIrTLANIDS
7//-7A DENOTES PILL INI WEiLAIND5
WDRIZOM-rAL SALE VEg: 1(,AL -lb(-ALE
wMd a.. 6W -n- I
20 !O O 20m 8 4 0 em
?4 Z -V. PATE 0 .
r?ar/cr
47ERAC wP'. [NG Y
oco- CS
?O/iCA , w:rvA•o urrf ?r CS
ECASS CE ?s W/
B'R/P g ?• `p W/ C$ ElB??'
A,p R/P AA- -W CLASS /Imp R/P?]1E
Ui Tc CLASS '8'RrP RAP
r l Y pTCN SWAMP
[- f
y E SiArES UNE ,
Si •iCY?xsn
C/MA'E( CRNN ?tr?( _ W I 1
rr' _ N Aw 4'.
/O
{•
ICf??A IT
MtTU10 i
7-7
w s -R?
37
3 ? i v ` C cuss r wv Rw ; ,{' .
* f F L 1 rv / / -
.? J
i. /• /.
Z,V- PprE O .
PROP. GRADE -L-
Ila Ecx,E - 0.9605
WETLANDS L
7 (a- 1 i ;I TYP. Zf2
-ILI
N 6r
I UNOERGU7?/
ILL
1 I ? I I I I
177+6D 177+SD 178+DO 1'18+ZD x78+,4D I7e+(op 178180 1-7,9+00
ms`s I DEt\IO i ES W TLAN1C,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
8IVISION OFHIOHI'fAYS
DENOTES 11=1L! 111 I.JE I LAI?ID S RICHbIOND COUNTY
••e-! 6.500001T (R-5120)
•? DEt\1OTES EXGAVA 1 ION IK) WETLAI\l05
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM 0.6 Km WEST OF SR 1002
DENOTES UNDERCUT 70 0.G Km EAST OF SR 1025
t-IORIZDNTAL 5C-Al-E VF.A-fIGAi- 54A1•E SCALE AS CHOINNr?
SHEET 113 OF JULY 1905
20 10 O ZDm 8 4- 0 Orn
i .
?Ia
yc . IaY`??. / SWAVP
-L- CS STA 179<)a596 / J / \
1 \ L. sr,. STA 598 ?
-L• P05 STA 179.18.375 \ \ yL Say •L-
ctp 1 4 \
I • ?.
ct,
W/ cs ELS fLBGW CLASS 'e
W/ CS R!P RAP
•o ?P•
F ENO wx.FEACE
aASS nRiP RAP
1 ?f I BEGIN WJY.FEACE Lbvc.FtuuF w -%D>-
'FUNNEL 1 x -•X.?. Q /.• _? DRNN
f :.? SMRILtlfR BERM arrER T
??? N ^ o? _i '• : of c
Q w `4 c s / MELT
?}„-? ? L ?xs• alt
?+/ ?JE .• C [ F EAr/?/ WE7LAM0 16.667
e . L P Eo w. ura r,SyMELT
Z
yc y c N//? CAT I
sLawf srACes u_E
FN( ABANLYINE AvNCL
Q P/WSfo S f CI/M'NE?CIIAIYLE F
? ? ? ?. V FAH
?Tc- ? 51T` 3
CHORD
?L -GlXSA4 :L. ?
1 EDGE WETLAWDS
g2 PROP. GRADE -L- '`
'0.46D5
711 I?:17YP. 3S2
NGI O.H,W. •- 3 -
J 72
UNDERCUT
I I I 1 I .I 1 A7B
1-79.4 DO 179+ZO I74+40 17cit60 17` 4.90 190+00 180+27) IOD*40
DENOTES UNC)ERCUT
Y?Y I DEMO 1 ES 'v lEl LA1\IC ? NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
D;V:ZION OF HIGHWAYS
DEt-,lD ES I-11-L INN UJE 1 LAI?IDS RICHMOND COUNTY
G.SOODOIT (R-512Di
DE"- NIOTES EXCAVA 1 10N I1\? 1^??71 A?\?DJ PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET PYPASS
?•a ° FROM E.G Km WEST OF SR 1902
TO O.G Km EAST OF SR 1025
DENOTES FILL BELDW SLIRFAC E. WATER
!4091ZDNITAL STALE VGi%1IC.Ai- KCAL[ SCALE AG SHOWN
SHEET (14 OF IS(O JULY 1005
ga
m
2
66 4b zo
' F1Ll? li%i
NG
UNDERGuT
4-0 20
ON j-j

O 2b 46 bb
I-7q+3Z-L-
SECTION K- K
Mi .
1?CNV F1??
RCLIT
D
2 40

7b.
72
7S2
S}TE
DENOTES UNDERGLI i

w Y
? .r
KENO i ES t..II:TLAi?105
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTI.SENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DENOTES !-ILL IN WE-) LANIDS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1! RICHMOND COUNTY
•. = .' 's
DEmOTES EXGAV/1`I !ONi IN WE-(LAt\105
j3•500 0e1r
(R-st<D)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
DENOTES FILL 13E1-DLJ SLIRrAGE WATER FROM D.G Km
VIER
O OF s
1902
^
TO
D.G Km 1
EASST T OF .,R tG<<
G
WOR17- DnI7AL SLALE VE,RI IC.AL L(-ALE
SCALE as srlorrN
EET 115
S 00 (" JU
Y
993
L-`' `- 12? .cc. .? ?? H L
1
2.0 10 O 20..: 8 0. Hm
FILL
SITE NO. STATION STRUCTURE ' FILL EICAVATION below UNDERCUT TEMPORARY TOTAL
in in SURFACE in FILL FILL
WETLANDS WETLANDS WATER WETLANDS in WETLANDS in WETLANDS
(ha.) (ha.) (ha./cu.m( (cu.m( (ha./cu,m) (cu.a(
25 158+33-159+14 -L- 1@ 2.4x1.5 RCBC 0.80 0.025 0.50515000 9650 0.0 63800
2 6 3+40-4+41 RAM P C 750 RCP 0.22 0.0004 0.0 0.0 0.0 5506
2 7 166+50-166+55 -L- 1500 RCP 2.15 0.83 0.035/170 950 0.0 12300
2 8 171+83-172+36 -L- 450 RCP 0.40 0.0 0.0 3000 0.0 41000
2 9 172+59-174+90 -L- 1050, 750 RCP 1.07 0.0 0.0 5900 0.0 81600
30 176+19-176+84 -L- 600 RCP 0.16 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 10500
3 111+75-179+93 -L- BAG. over Marks Cr. 0.97 0.09 0.072/360 20400 0.0 40806
3 2 7+25-7+81Lt 44- No Structure 0.02 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50
33 8+01-8+47Rt -Y4- No Structure 0.03 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 350
34 15+05-15+65Lt -Y4- 600 RCP 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01!3070 4300
3 5 15+07-15+51Rt -Y4- 600 RCP 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 - 2000
TOTALS ' 6.00 0.15 0.61215530 48300 0.14/3070 328200
` This total includes surface water areas delineated as wetlands.
NOTE: Site 31 is below headwaters, all other sites are above headwaters.
0.16 ha. of wetlands drained,
` TOTAL FILL IN WETLANDS = 6.00 ha, / 328200 cu.m
TOTAL EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS = 0.15 ha,
TOTAL FILL BELOW O.H.W. = 0.612 ha. / 5530 cu.m
TOTAL UNDERCUT IN WETLANDS = 48300 cu.a
TOTAL TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS = 0.14 ha. / 3070 cu.m
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.509001T (R-5120)
PROPOSED U.S. 74, ROCKINGHAM HAMLCT DYPAS
FROM 0.6 Km YtEST OF SR 1992
TO 0.6 Km EAST OF SR 1025
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHECT 1 IFj . OF I5i° JU:.Y 1995
°

Q:) D CY)

JT' 00

p Q ?o

- o
?O M

?U-)
00
Cl-
iQ r- _ _ mot- ' Z C) N
Z Y

/2
L) 0
0
fw / o
t `` O Z C)

` O' ° ? a ` e S
?

r
d • rc w .
_ _ ?1

U
' 2 w m V
CI-

o
?
Z
0
I A- _:? ~<• -
? E /"?
VJ

: O
;t
s 3 L a!r r •: s
VK?.` F --
o
TW 15
J CD
N = Q
Z

SHEE ? I8 Or ?5?

M0 +8 L *ViS 3NI?HOldIN
3
" Y
Z6C
2LL'99
+
+ (L '
+ .

+ E +
+ I \
+

+ \+?
+ ,\

W +o m +
+ \

?U
? (Y + _
+?
+ N

C'4
+
\
Q

Li + w

0-
+ 9
E

Q U
+ O?
co a
U w + 00
CN co

x N U I
z 1
0 Lw I
I o
cr 3 i
0- I
I 00
1 Z
Li
1
I
OOZ+8 L
? r

]
D
I r
J

D I
I
I
I
I WZ•1 WZ•L uw£ ' D
w U
I
I We
WZ L
WZ l
O Z

I

tl li
m
I i C)
r l a c
I

m I C
c
L'Ct9 3 r 3
;'ZZ L N I N
(3Z L 9d) 1600689'9 103r0ad 31b1S N1038
9F9'9C L +9 L ViS lOd
LEGEND
D FILL IN WETLANDS
I
l 1
w
J
Q
LL
O
U

N

0
z
r
co
g ? s
? (D ar c
M O
.
d
o
r
Jl i1
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512E)
5m 0 10m US 74, ROCKINGHAM- HAMLET BYPASS,
EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 119 OF 15co

05V+91 diS 31\1I?HO1dW

+ +
+
+ +
+ w
+
+ `
+ o
_
+ o
+
S
+
+
w r
+
?
V) 0
+
+ -
a) O°
O
U
+ O? +
+ ? +
00-b+9 I. diS +
.+ O
+
+
00 + w
+ U

N + Z + LL-
O
+
+ +

}
Q

O } +
+

o
w +
+ M,
O O
I?
0
0 +
+ j
0 +
+ w
3
V)

00C+91 ViS 3NnH3iVh
2
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
L GEND DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
FILL IN WETLANDS 6.589001T (R-512E)
US 74, ROCKINGHAM- HAMLET BYPASS,
Sm m EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
i , , , i I SHEET 120 OF 15?
a

t
+OZ .v15 -1
08 L I ? , N t

,

? i • I 4s ? ??zr

?
`
f I
U-) .s
!
cLO W a `?' i z IF> W i 6
°° i 0 i-- L 0 A
00 N I ? cp I W +

C?\ LJ U)
co
00
OOL+OZ
\
..
....
.
tp
a08 w 0

!

ct? I
I
!
Q J

v r L
c=? !
' I ! Q
w
::D ` !
0
° )
J I J
I Ld

`w \\
N
0 LLJ
0 0
!
00.
m
! 1

\ Z

g L x
a
I 0 W
0 !i.
J
i
Lu Q
00
! I ,,
C
? ` 3 1 I a !
J W.

N
1 ?``
-?j 0000 W V. ? +
+ O
d _
V O N
V
ck? + + r-
c? < m

F-Od I 1
cn 000 ° 3 11 (f
f
I
!
I +
+ +
+
=.cD
? cx
J r
W a-'Y
°
W 4 ?! i
+ I t
+ QOF- 0-
o
UNQ 0? ?O \` + +
?t m 0-
LO
a
\
z x<
wmQ ?cc

20+600
-
S
W NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
LEGEND DIVISION O F HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
FILL IN wFILANDS 6.589001T (R-512E)
US 74, ROCKINGHAM- HAMLET BYPASS,
Sm 0?10m EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
SCALE SCALE AS SHOWN
I , I i SHEET 123 OF ?1
I ; I
cn O oo cal v cam:; oI
O? OI O Oi O'
;
I I
I I I
I
?'II
II? ;
.:
( l ; i

°

00
I?? I o
? II11?I

I 1 ! E
I I
I ; 1; j
CD I__1__I
Ij 00

! N
i ! I I!
i

O j

I--?- I-

E
i ! i I r! N O o

I ! I
I , ?I i Z
?
V)
?
Qf ^
l?l? I Q
J I I I I
cr
V)
p I
o I??? I I
! ; ?, Z
x
°

o I
;
io, I ?I ? w z
o
CL i !+ , I i I
? I ; J
I
f`
?
I
i ( O
°
c
a
+

l ;

l I I; I
o
N

i
` I I I l I S1-?t =sa 3 7 0
i
I i
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
l DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

I RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512E)
i ! US 74, ROCKINGHAM- HAMLET BYPASS,
EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
I i SCALE AS SHOWN
N O Op cad et N IO
°l °? ° ° °
SHEET 124 OF I25?
s

.x
z
w
w
d
Q
w
N
O
a
O
a
I
J
i
I
z
w
w o
z
O
cr
Q ?
o c
c:) G
c Z
a
z
0
U
W
O
LL
O
0
t0
II
f
CD IV
N
? V J
E
O
W
J
Q
U
o V
?n
N
Q
Z
J
Z
J
Q J
Z w
W
J
S}'SE 37
NC DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512E)
US 74, ROCKINGHAM- HAMLET BYPASS,
EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET 25 OF 1Se
c^i ?? O? OI Ol Oi C
SITE NO. STATION STRUCTURE FILL EXCAVATION UNDERCUT TOTAL
IN IN IN FILL/CUT
WETLANDS WETLANDS WETLANDS IN WETLANDS
(lIa) (ha) (m;) (m)
3G 18+180 - 18+400 -L- NONE 0.08 0.06 650 1320
,37 20+700 -L- 750mm RCP 0.13 -0- -0- 4125
,38 22+010 -L- NONE 0.04 -0- 400 .128()
TOTALS 0.25 0.06 1050 6725
NOTE: All wetland sites are above headwaters.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OP TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.589001T (R-512E)
PROPOSED U.S. 74. ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF SR 1825 "r0 WEST OF NC 381
SCr\LE AS SHOWN
SHEF.TI2GOF 19, AUGUST 1995
PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESSES
1. City of Hamlet
P. O. Box 1229
Hamlet. NC 28345
2. Arthur W. and Man, M. Stogner
Rt. 2. Box 36
Hamlet. NC 28345
3. J. W. and Emma B. Beane
T30--G-i6Y-Fbk 'Square
Rockingham, NC 28379
4. John and Linda Poole
Rt. 1. Box 524
Hamlet, NC 28345
NORTH C,UZOLINA I)EI'Alt'I'MEN'I' OF'I'IZANSI'ORTA'rION
DIVISION OF HIG141WAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
6.5890011' (R-5128)
?ROPOSED U.S. 74. ROCKINGHAM HAMLET BYPASS
FROM EAST OF SR 1825 TO WEST OF NC 381
SCALE AS SHOWN
sm--. r127OF 1'6to AUGUST 1995

v pr, ).Ib I LAO `
M

I '
• •b•,,,,,,
?,y l `!k
1O7 Ir .?.
771 ,? .1 . r7 L P
-Wt I
?'
? °?r ? ?".?? _ 1
v ' o v . !113 •, '

L
HAM•ET;;
ror
no 'o

%

1

rws
714 .
.
?
o L

.
In. -
-! } 341
1107
?
?11II
Y I ?J31 .? 7 v 1. f 1 )
.
•
10!), :x°09 i? `
? 1a '?
'rt.1 71'• mu
?.) 'roo
d SITE -°4
too,
38
121 ? - ,, 1l41 r
1 l '? ` :.i ? ? ?4 G? 141, to•(o t... j.
'°Lm WL $% VICINITY MAP
!147 n 1{2? )A-
' FROM NCDOT COUNTY MAP
_?.uv OF RICHMOND COUNTY
l ?•.
m e
(` /???1??? .?.. 1. .7 1 in
1
1
`? `' • •`•\.??`J ? ' \ • ? / 111 - r°?? -••iA ° ??f l-,./ • ? r l /?
Ilk 3(5e -SIT 42
SITE 41 ?. .
C
-- ?--- --'-' \?- - -?'' j ., SITE 40 ,:. ? - ? ? _ ..f<i•? <.?
'6 .. v SITE 39
• <1 lei - - B -
'k, ?k4lz
;h i•.' Vi%'!. \ - __/`, / ?/ `mil ` 4 \r 1
?..,?-..' ,,\\ • "y `•? - O ?i?_ra ? ??' \l•-? o`er.
I. ? _ 1'7.1.7 . ? •Sj(? ?` ? t
I VICINITY MAP
FROM U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAPS f=.
_ 0 0.5 1 km
0 b ! ` lop ,
_ \l(1 // '? SCALE 1:400 11 !, i t
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 T
PROPOSED
U.S. HWY. 74 BYPASS
SHEET 128 OF !Sb
,Zis.
d00l
9 a ^ ?~
s Yj O
/ 11
?'^ dd
set€x? ? ?
s"' .=off € ? ?
I I I n >
k E E
_R $ + \
on moo "' + \
1 1 1 1 1 d +.
71-
+
\\ 4. = Q
Z
O
a?
OQF-
0- z
(n _ D
ZQ = 0
F- LL- 0
O Z
LL. 0
O Z:2
O =
w>of
co
U
Z
F-
O
O
)
M
W^
LO
W
U
w
O
cr
a
U)
Q
LO
L / '.
O?
a
O?
O?
CL=
vi
(v

O
0)
NI
F-
W
w
2
N
0
d
? *6d
? ? 27'4 1
Ih/ n d/b`
g 9gXo
8- A p _Q
P O O +? a
N
ag i

"!2
M;
V, O
N
O
O
J
W w
Q
O fn
C
O
N
W
N
O

Z Q
LLJ
H
Q

Z
Q Q
?
W
X
N D
(? Z L
w Z
J
L? Z
D J
L,
(n

O <n
Fw-
O (n

O
w
0 w
0 w'
0

N?Xoylo 0

/
I /
/ f
/
a Fe
r` ?ada?? ?
J +
? .P
i
i Q
?'^ ddd
"_?y'8Sn!
e F•1 otl P
/
/
/ c4
n
14 /
/ bag ao°g o /
!Q ?
? now
*°o7 1
/
4F B E? $ 3
_ a °
$

o OOO
a
??
/ ? oX'` 1
G ?
+
o ? ? 0 5
I

a A-
234
e s
A /
?

r ?? €a ?? ?? a yh
4cW
\ E E o •
$ o E ^/ ??
^
• p
On \ x?

\ ? r-a?aa

o
O
0)

???
• < X X
\\ O
hs F E F E
0 O
\ s 5 "> TS: 0+000.000 LOOP "A
= \
\ POT: 23+454.357 -L-

ga

z
O
N
?Q}
~
(n

Cl. a 2 ?
C
O
0) Q
>-

m
z
U Lq °
0
`r
LL. 0 ~OZ
W (D O
d? -?
oZ? C)
LLI Cl.
o=
~ L U D
O _
O
w j of Q? N
0 o a of

U
Z -
~
W
W
V)

O
ld*
o 0
0
o:
i
J
W W
a
^ O cv
V
o
N
W
z
0
F
z < o
Q X Q
W -1
W
Z • J
D L?
N N
H F
O 0
W W
0 0

9L8 '80 t = 13 898'801 = 13
!Ad
OOS'IZC+O = LZ9'1Ci :0 'ViS 30V80 ON3
,
b\ ?
?

o

o I
,
o
o
0

°N E o
?o
N
O00 i
0 N

nano
F W Y

N W
s
a ;

LOL'OII = 13
009'09Z+0 = OAd 1

f
of '
Co
;

co

i
1
1
1
*S8ZIl = 13

0097 2+0 = lAd

0
SGNVZ13M d0 300
£OZ+O NOLLVIS N
O

1 K .o b aD
o o8a
?
s p I I N
1 i 1 J J J
a =V1 W WW
W
JN
V
A
?N E?u?
W
o E °$r
E?-? g
ng
o
. V N? N
1
1 A
o
p
pi
-
W> 1
'1 p
<N
N=JOY01°°
O SONV'113M JO 30"3
m 91,,+0 NOIlb_S
a ?
,
,
i

E
i
O

co O

0 i
00 ?i
N ?i
i
II II II i O

> Y i
O

1
W i +
O
W
i
i
i
O Ul) O Ul) O
C14 - 0 0

a
N
z
O
1=
N
Of _
°
Q- Z
D O
m
zC
O
U ? C)
d.
N
Ckf
I- LL o co O
a r
oz
o
?
L)
a
z
O = UJ =

~NU
w j Ckf
O
of

vi LL
O
0 o a 'l
U
Z
~
w
Li
V)
O O
O
° o
° o
^ N
o o
W a
U a
N U
N
J J
(n O Z O U
V o
N_ 0:
0: ?.
O
W O O
Z
H
W
a
U
x
w
O
L)
W
rill O
C)
C Z
N
w
H
O
Z
W
O
)OCx
O ? O O O
?
I OI
I

a
I O
i ?
I
1

F-
l
?I O

I
zz t
O

v Q I a-
O
I N
Z
I
I
SONV-U3M 30 3003 I
H
a - - - - ?,_
Q- 0

O -- +,

O
0 ?-

-- J
..
_ O -

O
SONVl13M 30 3003 ( N
r
(
r
J
a r -
O

f

(
1 J
O

OI (nl o n O
f ) ol
Q
Z
O
_
} N

°?Z
o N
Q
o m a
m
z
o
U co L
N
S
F- LL- p (D O
OZ
O Z
U p 3I
_O=
~NU
O 2 L;
O:
W > a
O p a N.
;
I
M
U
Z ~
W
W
2
V
w N

w
H
N N ~
W W
X (If
0
U
H<-;
0
O U U m m
w W >
2 S U U
r(1
v? J 0-
Q) r7 0
tA
N
C)
N U ,^
V1 too F) ?
J W ^O N O?
U
O ir ~ wO
> z 3
(n
¢ Q
V J Q
ZUU
aaX
F- w W
O LJ
O 3(nO?
-t LLI L)
I O Z Z Ly

J
wa

(yj
C/) JJZO
Q a F-
U
I Lur)
J
a

z

0

U
W

Cn
V)
? Z m

V) W
0 - W
?°
?z

o

?3
z
a
LAJ ?
W

0W V
->
oa ?Q
o(?
W w X w
o? oW o(n
V\-4

r- so
/ / .?3? ddNd
/ / q l I I I 1
/ lous.ne
/
/
? i
7 /
s /
o /
W
X h,
1 . 1 1

00
00

R
?EFbB
a
111111

O 1/ 1 1 1 d
y OC
M1
n
r
3

e8
•Y
\

1
I 1 ft+
1
1 W
23+500 -L-
I
{

?

1
Q)
p 1
I 03 -~t
1 ?
LOOP 'A" (16.2m LT) _
7 -L- --- -
? o
05

Q 9f
=EG
' d l
I I I I I d
<g1,>e 1

O
X
I
I
I
(
1
1
1
I
1
Z
O
cn' V)
OQF- Q
O rn °
O
Z
O
CO m
ui
N .d.
Of
f- Li °
0z
0 cD d r

O
>:
0Z a

to U
O ,.L

O
W>_ N
°p a ° ?v
C5
Z
~
W
W
2
V)

O
,It
G)
0 O
l.J O
_ ^ O
W W
J
Q
n O N
V /
O
N
_W
Z
O
H
z > (A
X Q
LLJ
~ 3
n ?
c Z
1..1. L)
W
O J
Z • J
la
V V)
W
0 0
w w
0 0
IXIXIX
N ?
I i
i
,
i
` °o
` +
N
,
1
1
1
,
,
,
,
dd
\ < gEF??+
Z?,TpTRA
„n
0 \?? $ =J??58
cr
0
w
v `\
d SONV113M 30 3003 \\
J ZZS+CZ I
O
O
co
+
M
N
i
SONVU3M 30 3003
w ?
z ; W
J z
0 0 ;'
o E z
O
10 $ =? O I (V
LOto0 c W J
+ovi0 0 W N
11) N u) 't 04 o (0 C6
q II II II N ; Z Lo
V1 W Q
0. N N j
_J
J
zN(nW
o ,
Vi
° N
,
I ,
o
m to
3NIl HDiVY4 , N
° to ° 0 0

z
O
H
F- V)
H
adz o
) O
Z rn tam
L
Q=U CO (n
Li 0 c0 d '
aozo
0
U o
d ?.
l
Z:2
Q = > =
?cnU
w > a 0
Of
(n O•
I
0o a qT!
MI
U
Z ,
?I
W
W
N

sf 7 d'

rCl
lJ ? O
°
O
O
O

O
N N
W J
Q

U

J
Q

1
U)

J U

N
J
(n
VV ?' O z
o O U

W
O
C14
O
C14

W Z
O
i=
J Q
1
L.L. U
x
w
O U
LL w
w

n
tom. 0
z
D
N
• w
0
z
w
0
ZXIXIIX
8 133HS 3NIl HO1VW

-
0

;I
-

- 04
77
- - J
77
-

O -!E
D - -ii - I-

'--_

- -: F-

_ _ - I 0
0
z I J
o
f -
I Q0
Q
? I
H I
Q

I J
I 0
I t\
I
i
I J
-
0
co
O O LO OI
NI 01 OI

z
0
F

Q- Z
o o
rn a
° m
o
z
U
`n LLJ
0

f- LL- 0
L
°p

F- O ,
a
0}

?
?
O Z:2
0
LLJ
a 3
= I

I--?U

W>x D
0

X

V LL.

O
pp d 0 Ln
re)
U
z
~
W
W ,
N

NN

i
LLJ Li
f F-
V) V)

cr ? I
O ~~??

O
a UL)Mm
W W=) D i
2ZUU
J
lJ/
to 0)
c0 pr)
O N
n N
a
i
U
N w ^ O N O)
W QL)
~ V)
O
w
~ W
1
>

z E
O
3Q

Q >
Z U Q
V

W
W
O W
N
O LLJ L)
O _ ZZcr
W
J
W J Z 0
li lL D F-
Q

Lr) N
J
Q

Z
z
N
°

O

U
W •
V)

Of z af
W -W

J N
Z r-
J Q
li Z E ?i
V)
w -J
F- Li Q U

Q
O? OQ 0L
W w w D
X
O ? O LJ 00
® o
O
O
I ?) ) OI OI

Of
O
rn
SONNl13M 30 3003

o'
-
o
00

SONdl13M 30 3003 0= _
0

- H

_ O

O
O
F-

O - - O
(0 _ .r In

Q -.77'
T-= -
1-

_. O
- M

O
:7.: C14

i
L 133HS 3M1 HO1dW 0
z
O
HN
? N
03
=z
°o a
En
n
z0 2 °m
Q2U
?w Lo N,.
O?
OZ
0
o ~

U a
0

?
zM
w a ;
2 U
> of

N L?
LLLJ
0 o a ? ??
V -I
Z ~
w
w
2
V)
V) N
W W
!` H
N N
W W
?`of2:2

0 U U

O 0 U U CO m
W W D O
S S U U

Luo
U
M CY)
to
0
M
ONi
(n W O N 01

W - J
U
?
N
O
ck:
H
Z

Z O
3
Q Q
ZU(-)
x
J W
W
O
O La1Dr
V)
W
0 ZZLw
w
a
JJ01
-

J ? /?
V / J J
(? li O O
Q
V
I Ln
J
Q
H
Z
Z
N_
0
O
=
i

U
W •

VJ
U
(Ji
Q? ZOf
W - w
U)
?
D ~
Z 0
N ¢ N F
Q V) W
U
W
z3 zv zQ
W Wx WZ
o? 0 W O V)

i
i
G
40
w
>a

/
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I

moo. d0O7 a
15
a ?,? ss
?N dd
n ??Odd E
n > \
50
v .? Ti 1
`i!0ryti? ? I
f '
a
1
3E
eO ° ?Q$
6Hra
1
? K E
3?N>
r?
/rT
a.? aa
F ? E
x 91X,
d ddd.J
d
z
O
p
<N
V)
p Q 3 ?- Q
a- z
0 C)
M 0-

O
co
z
0
Q=CJ to N?
Qf
O
c0
0a
Z
0 0z?
U -
a
X02

05 LL)
tai
w>W ct N OI
cc a- r`
?
(5 I
w
w
V)
(D
Id*
m
TIO
W
V /
W
Z
CL
0 o
C%j
0
0
W
J
Q
O (n
0
N
z
0
F-
j V)
0
x J
H ?iJ
w z
w -
Z J
D
N N
F
0 0
w w
? a
i
a
Z
O
r
° 1a N UJ
Z06'LOL = 13 3NIl HOIVVi + O Q f- Q
000'092+0 = 0Ad ° N = ? O
0) 0
No
SONV'U3M JO OLLVJ( Z O m
_S LLJ
cn Q2 U co V 0) 0 r,
U- in (D CL
LL- O O r ,n
r O Z V a
w
O = = tL
> O
Li , Qf (N
/ W?a -j
/
U
i
i Z W
i + =
i
/
i
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ w
/ z
I J O O
i ?
i Z
i/ 0 O
a O O
/ U
/ N
Q / Z N O
OC
/ J J
/ X
O i LLJ
w U Q
O N 008 11 N
/
N M O J
Q Q
04 + Nt°DO J v J O Z O U
O N iA / O f-
/ N d
u u u u f ? ?
O
> Y ; S
< W
(n i
i
O
a a I 00 ' • ' ° CN14 C14
' N L1J
/ +
1 °
Z
i
Q
W
1 M Q
U
i ? w
i +
/ w M {-
Z N
d O U
Q tr i
r- w j
Z N to ry Z
j Z Z
J w
z
LLJ I N
D i w
i a J N O
C7 N00 c6 z
w
It 0c 11
Q:?>
e1 1 Q ,, J
w N w
II
i
O
O tr)
O O O
/
W
z
1
I

w
0 1

0
1

a
1
1
o
I
'
1.
1
CL
: I
'
Q
c '
r
O
o E
o 0o ?
op
S
O ,
N
O i
1
$
+ °g
o
n u u u r !n
+
Q >UY
N W> r O
5
5 '

CL
a w
i
z
J ,
Z
I
O 1

Z
F
N
w
i

SONVI13M 30 3943 O
O
v
+
o

I I I I
8? ?" dd
€
+
g 72 a";N

1 E d
tt
O
Z06'LO t = 13
+
000'09C+0 = OAd 3NIl HDiVh o
vi o 0 0 LO
O
z
O
_
N
a3z o
ZOO Om
m
Q 2 U
? Or
OZ

LL-
O
? ~

U lnI
Z
o=
L a
2
LL
Fn U
w 5; F O
x O
0 o IL
Mrn•.)
U
Z H
W
w
2

0 0
? 7 d
m O
O O
V / O O
N N N
L) a
W a
N U
N
J J
Q
1./ / O z O U
1./ ' O F
0
O
S
W O
C14 C14
z
F
W
J >
Q
U
LL- X
W
O
U
w
0
n z
LL o
N
w
F-
0
z
w
0
I
I
i
Y
O?
h•
Lr) oI o
o
I I ol rnI

o

0
z
D
O

o
F d-
a
z -
- F-

0

- - F- O

U

a
-- - -
O LLJ

O - - V)
_ Of
O --- _-. '--. --_ r- U
LL

--
LLJ

Ch
-
-
-
-
- -= - Z
- --- - O
r- O

m
N

ev,

N W
LL
O
V)
)- W
J U
- °
O w
rl)
? O Lr) H
I I p l pI p
j l
O
Z
z
0
F-
QN
°3z o

0
0 Q-
° m
Q=U
z
O LO O

W
OZ

O

1!)
O
0Z
:2 UJ Of
a

k = o LL.
W>Of Q vi
.
C) a Oi
,I.
0
Z ~
W
W
2
V)

V) N
c?
V ) V)
W W
Li Li
Of w
0 <?aUU
0 0 w W N= FD Fn
m
2 2 U U
rn
' J O
O)
r'") O
0 O
N
lJ V c n tO O M
Lij
J
Q I?
V)
O
W Z
? z aF
-
(
/'?
C Q
V)3>
4
0 0WQ
X
J
W
W J
F-
=
0 3v
iL)LL
w .
I p

?

? z Z w J
w
J J O F :
U W
i C JJZ0
L-
M
V
LO V)
J I
?
f
z
Z
I

O
I
i
U
LLI i
r ~
D
V ! I

w -W
J N

Z
~
J Q
Z 0p
H -J w
> LU
OLLI h
-
OQ
z O?
w
w X C)
OW W D
OV1
a V\14
a
N
z
0
< (10
(n
Qf
0Q? - Q

Z
Z) o
m
U 0
t,r) LLJ
(nQ cfl
i-?o co ar- LO
U-00 O
moo= - a= 0
F- L C).
W> of ,
0
Of
N

0 p
n- -
D ?
U

Z w
W
2
U)
0
E
d
?b
K M.d ?g E
zJ°?
l l

1

-. a ..
a
. . e.de
k
_
\ F : .r
_ W W
W
0
04 0

0
o
W J

o
1
(J?
0
N
W
Z

Z O
G

a

0
Z
`
C 1 X
W J
?
U U
Q

a
? cr
W z

}
Of
Q O
Z
=
(10 J
J
W
V)
0 0
w O O LLJ
+ a
0

+
+
f +
+
+

+

+
+
+ k
+ Y 3
? Y«

ti' n
+ co
N ?$ + Q w
o 8a
Nv 3m a
a 1 Z't w
0
00 141 ^bh
J a G' + ? J 8 ryON
N w
to +
+
+
+
W +
+
+
F ggK^ + ; i
+ Q
"' "'do + $O2 Srl j
1 I let 1 + ?•^ A -
Q1
^ ?n ZS gd
S R V '" R
a ,vim S9!
o
„1 Np x
Z
O
Q
Q
?
CD r Q
O
Z
O

U

00
L
m
LL)
N?
I- Lt- 0

WQZ cD O
a?
r
?
v?
O
Qom w
Of
O

LL
n _
?-
wax p
vi O
Q d C\ j,,
U
Z
~
W
W
N

O
L
s

I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
V
I
q 1
I 7
=rd.04o
dd?6d
X 1 1 1 1 1 C
°'<uNMe

i
-
:

? 1
R g ? E 1
=
"'
M

I s x
oS'dq
1 1
t JJI I

1 1
nM ?? Z ,
w?
?o
Q Fn
e
SN 1 / wp
<
i

1

Yy^
•[ 11 11

?N u(ir N`n
W
? 11
? ?

i Fli?g ?
~ LO

i
? nE QQ
I.r e?a?if
?58
N <
Sa
i ppp•pp o ^ s
N
J m , II ? vy?
? KK¢ Om
??

i I S c

I I o
1
1
1
i

ctc ! +
r
N +
1
1
+
F
43
+
+
+ L-

I
1
+ S
1
+
N H
10??pap
IF. ?N
j t'P lip pN?
? NNO.O.-O1A?
O 0
fV 0
O
W
Q
J
O
N
V /
O
N
W

> Z

Z 0

U

W Q

U ~
D 3
a u
w
C? Z

J
}
W z
D J
a0
w o
0 0
0

D
0 %
c
0
Z ,
,

X
W

,
,
%
o
o
+
N
SONV'U3M -10 3p(13
06Z+4Z NOLLVIS

d
_ $N d
Lo FF Z
N
N i
7SR3
NV
09Z+4Z NOLLVIS
,
i
i
?
S
i
i
i
/
i
J
O
N (0 J

.. 7 i
I
+ O i
v
N t
W

D
1
1

0
i
1
i

W N (14
I z N

w 1
1 Q

f"
z i V)

w '
1 O
a
o=
O '

i z

z J
1 I
W
? rn
0
a 1
; --
_Y CV
co
W
W
O ?-
U)
' O

II
0
i O
/
E
i
W
Q

r /
? J
cr) W
II
i
1
i

?
i m
. , p
O
3N1-1 HXVh ?+
N
O O O
O

z
0
Q 07
0 3 ?- r QQ
a- Z
CD
rn
?m
z
0
< 2 U co V)
0
p
U
a
-°_
cn U L
p o
w J Fx Cif N
op a MI
V
L5
Z
~
W
W
2
V)
O O
d '7 st
0
O O O
O O
,?} N
v N O 04
J W
W Q
N N
J
J
F- Q
O O
O
N
G=
O
W o 0 cli
z
W
a
U
ww
0 U
N U
. w
0
Z
V)
W
F-
O
Z
W
O
lxllx?
O O O
I I D I
I
O O

SONV-U3M 30 3003 O

O
v - M

O
- N

- H
-
, O
O -- •-
O
O -
O -
00 -

N -

H
U)

z
O
O J
-
D
c9 O

D

z
F-
_ J

N
r `-

O

SONVl13M 30 3003

? J
-
O

O O O
I I OI ?I pl
z
O
N
>-
Q V)
cn
0
N 2 =) r
O
O Q
>-
Zoo
= U ?m
N
f-
LL- 0
L
cfl O

O
L.
ozo
OS v
? a
_
LL
`- T)
w > O
o-
vi 0
0 o a = ?I
V
Z
~
w
W
2
N

N V'7

H H
LJ V)
W W
w ? :2 m
0 < < U
U
O 0 W W°= °m
'- SSUU
in 0 -
O J 00 0
O 1
)
Ln U
V) LLJ 0 1 0-1
LLJ
O _
Q ~.
O
W
_ > z 3j
r
n
V l V)
°?a
Z
U
U
- W

°o W H J
3v?vU

p w -
zzOf
W

w
J c J ,^ JJ Z p
1.- 4.
Q
U
tun) N
J
Q
F-
Z

Z O O
N

0
Q'

2
° .
_
U
W '
(
V !
U
~
(n
of Z a

J N W

Z - W
!-
J

u Z
2 o Q
a:
w-'
N w¢ wU
O? O¢ O?
O!
Z
w
0- zU
wx
0 w Z
Li 7)
0V)
V\A

Q VI VI
a d
N N N
a
1008
S 1 d
Rxsfi
dddAci
G
1+-VZ
)9+tZ
3
1
1 ?
tl
1 $
i ?
1 80
C
1
s ?
1
1
i
I
(
I
I
x C)
L(
+
0
IIN
co
z
I I
I
??rD? ?7b ,? U
o '-

`. 3

- - II

r?6??t i J ?
I
i 2s
1
I
I
Q
I
I
1
I
I
(I
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
i

_

/
/

X
X
X
k
Z
O
F-
< cn

~
cn
N
°-3z °
Z2O am

00 °m
LL)
U Lo
? ,t
F- Li °
O z
LL cD

F-
C
O
.
oo= Ld a= LL
(N U
wj? O
Of
ui O
°p a D v

U
Z _

~
W
W
2

0
a
W
-
(
V/
W
z
Q
O p
O
O
J
Q
O N
0
N
Z
O
Q
U Q
w
Z
w
? J
Z ? _J
LL
N Ln
w Ld
O O
Z Z
w w
0 0..

E
E 1
1
1
K' 1
I
I
p
1
1
I
I
I
I

O I =:
1 '
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I

d
a I
I

N

3M1 rs
LL14606.518

10
661 :1--:
0 31 VL n V!,

--
-;

It
Z .Tt
Wm„??
??
Nu??
A
NZZyS A0?
39
a
U ?
F
z
a
3 a
r b
t n
m
w°
0
Z . R?
aQ iig
Wm„

z
O
_
Cr) V)
N
cl Z C)
ZOO rn °m
N
Q 2 U
?L
? co
O Or
L.
lL O Z
O C
F--
U
Z
O = a
2
li
F- U5 U
Qw O
W
V) O

Dl
Q Cl- VI
U
z
~
w
w
U)

?t-
W
F-
U}
Lli
Z
Q F-
U
Q
n
Q
O
0-
m
W
O
"1' -1
O O
N O
O
J
Q?
O N
0
N
j
z
O
F-
Q O i
z
X J
W H
z
W -
? J
? J
N (n
W W
O O
Z z
W W
O O
,
,

\
- ? o
? rn

\ N

\l
9£' l'60 t = 13 ?
009'Z99+*Z = 0Ad
,
,
\
i
i
,
,
,
,

,

\
,
\
\
t

,

Z ,
O
J \\ p
O0
+
W ?
N

(0 J S0NV U3M 30 3003
LSL+4 NOLLV1S
LA-
O
0.
W N
Z
a.
Q

o v)

W
z z
J
W I
Y J 00
r12 P
a
s
it
is
o dd
g
Q N „?Y \

J
a
(D \
A
II
0 N

J t :?o$s8 i

Q ?
J
I I o

3NIl HOiVYq N

SGNV-u3M 30 3003
669+oZ NOUVIS
m
p p N 0
z
0
of> ~ N
d z

O c)
0
0)

m
O
z
U
? LLI
p`t

LL. z
L
c

t`
O
O
L
ozo= Li n. L

F- U
O = L..
O
wjFx w vi
O ?. d =
d'
?'I
U
Z
W
LLJ

i
?-7 07
O '
O O ;
_ ? p I
N
N N
LAJ Q i
a
W U U
F- J J
Q
O Z O U
O
V) L4
0
o_
LIJ o
z
o_
W
>
J a
_ U
X
W
1-
U
O O
uj
zZ
O
tAJ
0
z
w
0
lxvx?x
o
c
I ol I rn I ?I

OZ 133HS 3NIl HDlb'W
CJ-
H
'> J
•? O

p - -

O-

F-
V)

O

SONVI13M 30 3003
J
-
O
I
I
o I
Z ?.
I J
0 I -
o

a

? I
Z

I H
I -'
O
n
O O O
I
OI
I ?I OI
Z
O

FQ- N
Q N
O
3:: ?-
a_ z
Z
0
rn Q
CL
O
O
Q=U
t? m
??t
1 L? m
B
OZ co 0,

}:

?
n
O
OZ2

W O
d -
LL.
aOV
> Q:
O`
(n O
W
0 o a D Go,
U
Z
~
W
W
2
V)
N N
ww
NN
w w
M m
M ?

O UU
F- I<.-
p
O d U U m m
w w >

IL: 22UU

J ((D o
_ to U /^
V! C)
O o
O I
(n LJ t ?
J
V l_-
r

W
p ? _
{-- N
W
(
f
?
z o
3
>
N
L
J
L
ZUU
Few
p wDH
j
o _
3cnvG:
W
p

? ZZD:<
w
a
- JJ?F
-
J Cn JJZO
O
C
U

J
Q
F
Z

Z O O
"
0
O
_
U
W
r?
O
U

UI
/
V
w
z w
W - W

-j
N
J
0
Z r

J
Q
LL z Do
Q
~ >
LLJ Q
O O Q O w
W W

? X W D
0 w o V)
p 1 n
z
O
< U)
0
z ? cN
3 0)
z O
00 cm
C)
L
0 to
fl v)
d
L
Oz
0 c p v
O Z
0= U

LJ X
a=
LL
HNV
w > p
Of

vi c
0o a-
(3
z
~
LL-
Ur
U

ww
NN
wW
?XLLJ
:2:2
0 ? ? U U

O 0
sh UUmm

W w =)::)
= S U U

O O v
L.LJ
J
U -

W
O
{- N

F- cr WO
> z 3

N
D zUU
J LL- X
c W
0 Oi- J

O O
W N
V
Z Z c J
W
I - J J ? F
Q cn JZO
L? l? O f-

U
Ln V)
J
Q
H
Z

Z O O
"
.
O
_0 _
F-
U
W
r
?
V !
O
x

x
Z

J V) W
O - W
J H
L, z
z ZO Lz

L?? ? (nom
W Q
F-
> NW
U
0
03
OQ Q
OL-
W
? W X W D
0 W O N
o ® c
eo+100 -EBL-
d y,
?? L£l IZl a .7d/
s
® l
4.. w w 1
h
R ?
J? Y O

Qo
1 ?
0
a
4TI till
E
4
.12+20
RR
5 re
gig
oX Zp0

FFi EES
p ? QQ 8 KIIf
Q N e
M
go6k5z ??
1
0
Y
o

lb
z
O
_
F-

' ^
03
z
V) M Z)
0
rn

o
Z20
QU
=
000 m

?
N

LL- D
O Z
c0 O

r
O
OZM
C)
LL,
Of
a
aOV
O
? L
)
0o a o
LC)
U
Z
1-
W
W
N

O
d
N p
N °
J
W W
Q
? O V)
V
0
N
W Z
> N
Q 0
W Pj
Z
Q
? Z
W
^ Z ' _J
V V)
H
O O
z z
W W
? O

O
O E
O
0

c6
S (VI) 183 9Z l'0L 1+9Z '` iS
N
U
N C" N W C(81) -l- 9Z 1'0L 1+9Z 'ViS
Nunn
a
Y ?
r
-w>
(n W

a

w
Z
J ?
w
o
?
a ,=
D!
O

%

w Nl

a'
a
`?
SONVZI3M 30 3003
601+9Z NOULVIS
I
O
`
Z
J N
1 ?
i z
i D
O
i ?
? O
O
?
%
F
X
LLJ
1
rJ
'
l
Y
i
9d
eo $$

?? dd zg
>
N r,?jj °az
'
0

901'001 = 13 z S
000'bZO+9Z = OAd
0
O

cO
N
ONVa3M 0 30 3
L96+5Z NOLLVIS

(V-1) MV80 1
--183- N1038
O 0 L O v)
rn rn co
z
_O
P
N
Z
a?:_
Zc)O °
M
°m
Q=v CO cW
?U-O
Uo0 tD a? 1
o ?i
0Z
= ? a
U
0
~ N U
O =
L
O
wSE Q? N
n
U
~
Z W
W

V)
O O
O
O O
C o
_ N
?" N N
Q J
N U
W
(n
J J
1 Q
O Z O U
O
Lj N O
0
o
W 3
w Q
U U
X
M J
O N D
Z
w
J Z
V) V)
V) V)
O 0
Z Z
LLJ D
OI OI
) OI
l
co
a
4Z 133HS 3NIl HOiVY4
(?-

SONV-u 30 3003
o
I
I
I
I

I J
I
J O

I
? N
/
O
0 1
C5 I
? I

O
?• J
I _
O
CD
CV I
I
Q ?

N
H
?.1 J
O

' H
I J

? I
O I
w I
J I
Q I H
J
l o
Q
z
I
I H
I J
_
O

O! OI O)I ?1 00I
Z
O
F
<?
>-

p Q

N

CL z
zCDO
0
rn Q
0-
°m

=U
<
tco

Lli
(/
)?
Ckf
F- lL °
U
0 cD O ??
O ?
Vl
- .
O LLJ CL
?U

W ?

of

N
O
Oj
CU '
Z ~
W
W

V) N
Of 0?
W W
LU N F- ?-
W W
m M
cr Qf

0
HUC?
H
O 0 U U m in
W W D D
2 Z U U

N L, < (n ? o N ?
1
v J w O O 1? n
?
U ?
W O ~ W

?--
>
z t
- O
3
N
Q
X
J Q
H Q W

p W J
3: 0:)
w
p Z Z c j

<
W
- J J O
W J J Z O
Q

J
H

O O
N
Z 0
O
1
U '
.
W

V) U
V ? Of Z W
W - W
N
J
Z ~
J Q
z Do
Q
F-
H >
V
OU OQ I--
O<
W
p? W X
0 W W
?U)

0) 00
101 O? V)l
i
?II
I
p I
z i ?-
0 I Q

O -
a I ?
? I
D
Q
Z
SOMdl13M 30 3003

O
ca
N

'
-
O ,
O -
O - -

-- -
I .
O

-:- .....
O -

0
i - -

o ?'_ - cam- o

cD

CZ 133HS 3NIl HDiVY4 -I
OI OI OI 0I 00
Z
O

03 Q ? Q
zoo °m
Q = U CO
n 't
(
O z o
LL- O
0 O
02
1- N U ?
O Q. L-
O
w > vi
U')
U _
Z ~
W
W
V)
NN
ww
W LLJ
wwww

0
HFa-UU
p p
0 U U m m
W W D

IL: =2UU
ca

r{_
V N W OO-1
J i
I
W p ?- W o
~ X
' z 3
Q ?
>
C
O
2 V V
i
I X
<<
W
J I
O N
L
p w UL
J
ZZof
w
I
I _ J J ? <
W
C/') J Z O
li L. D F-
Q
in
N
Q. I
H

p o I
Z
0
O
_
U
W
C/) (
z w
w -w
J V) O J ~
w D Z
z O E
,
? ? V)
Li j V) LJ
uj U
O OQ 0L-
W

? W X W D
? OW 0V)
® a
3
f 0
J
0
0

co
m 0
m 0
m 0
m

m
JM
a O
O cn
M O
7 O
O to
- O N (
n
r
Q
0
o
°
°
'

° 0 0 O o r
o 0 0 0 0 0

Z_M
?0 `n ° ° to 0 'n
W Q M O
n 00 N O
Z Q N f? O ro

Cl- U
X
W

Q W
Z U
- Q

O

O

C
J 0: O ; O
U- ::) O c O O
N
N
z o O an r, ao o O
J a

N co O(D
? LO
rl, C14
7 LO
?
LL? N O O O O ?
H
? 4.
Lr
0
-

Z I
?MQ J
~ I O I
~rn? O J
~ I O_ I
I O J
t I J
o

Q ?OCVO ONON
to ?M? to
N M?
t0 Op O)
O) o ?O
00 O
~ _ +
i 0_5 (D
+ M }
<
+O0 04
+ t-
+ O+ +
O 1 NM
n
N O 1 04 It
-
N N?
v
N L
Nto
N 04 C14
N

0 0 N M

• z
o
< N
a cn
W
r
03
Z
z ? O
0)
° m

Q=U
co LLJ

Nit

c??
o CD a r` ?
I
U-
0Z0
U
Or
of
LL

o?
L
Q = .
o
?
_
w > o
W
U)

It
p 0 a U)
U
z
~
w
w
m
V)
LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS
1. S. J. KELLY
C/O SARAH GOINS
504 BOYETTE STREET
HAMLET, NC 28345
2. CECIL E. JACOBS
P.O. BOX 816
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
3. JOSEPH G. DAVIS
915 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28379
4. ELIZABETH McCLINTIC
1200 WACHOVIA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
P.O. BOX ' 3099
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27150
5. MARY LAND PARKS
C/O EDWARD PARKS
2141 OWEN DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306
6. ELIZABETH TEAL
2098 E. HIGHWAY 74
HAMLET, NC 28345
7. TERRY HUTCHINS
ROUTE 3, BOX 315
LAURINBURG, NC 28352
8. RICHMOND COUNTY
P.O. BOX 504
ROCKINGHAM, NC 28380
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RICHMOND COUNTY
PROJECT 6.589001 T
PROPOSED
U.S. HWY. 74 BYPASS
SHEET 155 OF 156 12/94
5 \.0482\0035`.DwS'\. 484WET20.Dw4
V 't) f ZsQ rr
CCA v"card
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS JUL 20 ?0,00
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 ,, •s,nc nransso
IN REPLY REFER TO July 18, 2000
Regulatory Division
Action ID 199301490, Rockingham Hamlet Bypass, TIP R-512
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Please reference the Long Swamp Mitigation Site (Site) annual monitoring report that was
discussed during our February 18, 2000 meeting with Project Development and Environmental
Analysis staff. As discussed during this meeting we noted several deficiencies in the report that are
more fully described below.
From a February 1, 2000 inspection of this site and review of the monitoring report, we have
serious concerns that the restoration areas on the property will not meet the required success criteria.
Specifically, wells LSG1, LSG2, LSG3, LSG4, LSG5, LSG7, and LSG10 failed to demonstrate that
the site met the success criteria as provided in the monitoring report. Notwithstanding these
observations, the report also failed to mention that the success criteria was specifically based on a
comparison with a reference wetland site. Absolutely no mention of this site is made in the
monitoring report nor was any information provided. Since you are not in compliance with your
permit requirements, we request that NCDOT provide a plan to us that fully describes actions that
will be undertaken to bring NCDOT into compliance with its Department of the Army permit.
We also note that 7 wells have been installed in existing wetlands on the property. The
hydrologic information provided by these wells is of little use since the areas being monitored are
existing wetlands for which no "credit" was generated. We strongly suggest that these wells be
relocated to the restoration areas of the Site where no wells have been installed. These areas are
easily identified from Figure 9 in the mitigation plan dated June 1997 and comprise approximately
33 acres. You are reminded that if the wells are not placed in a manner that adequately characterizes
the site, it may jeopardize our acceptance of the site.
As you may be aware, this site was selected and "approved" for use by the Mitigation
Partnering Team prior to our review of a mitigation plan. During the development of this plan it
became apparent that the site would not provide the required compensatory mitigation as determined

during our public interest review and the 404 (b)(1) Guidelines compliance analysis. By letter dated
December 16, 1997, we informed NCDOT that an additional 20 acres of wetland restoration would
be required to satisfy these Guidelines. On December 22, 1997, we received a letter from Dr. David
Robinson, Assistant Manager, Environmental Services, acknowledging this deficiency and providing
assurances that it would be provided prior to project completion. Since that time, we have reminded
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch staff of this requirement. However, as
of this date we are unaware of any efforts to correct this deficiency. Accordingly, in addition to the
requested plan specified in paragraph 2, above, a proposal to provide the required compensatory
mitigation should be provided to this office within thirty days from the date of this letter.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this correspondence, please contact
Mr. Scott McLendon at [phone].
Sincerely,
E. David Franklin
Chief, NCDOT Team
Regulatory Division
Copies Furnished:
Mrs. Kelly Williams
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Mr. Tom McCartney
United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. John Hennessy
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
a •
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. David Cox
Highway Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
11411-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522

3
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GovERNOR SECRETARY
November 13, 1998
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers i
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P. O. Box 1890
f
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTN: Mr. David Timpy `
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Mr. Timpy,
SUBJECT: PERMIT MODIFICATION REQUEST FOR ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET
BYPASS, TIP NO. R-512 A, RICHMOND COUNTY.
As you are aware, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued an
Individual Permit, Action ID # 199301490, for the subject project on January 29, 1997.
The N. C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) issued a 401 Water Quality Certification,
WQC Project ,# 951250, ow ril-1, 1997.; In a May 9, 1998 letter to NCDOT, you
stated that an inspection of the project revealed that plans to construct Service, Road
Number 3 would impact jurisdictional waters not previously authorized by the existing
permit. The purpose of this letter is to Tequest a permit modification to allow,
construction of this road.;
Service Road Number 3 is necessary to allow Richmond County Utilities access
to the substation located on this property. Access is controlled in this area due to Ramp
"A" and its acceleration lane. Control of access is required at a minimum of 100 meters
beyond the end of the ramp. The service road ties into US 74 immediately after the
access control ends. Reducing the control of access limits would adversely affect the
safety of the motorists. NCDOT also considered connecting the road to the ramp, but
since some of the service vehicles accessing the substation would be trucks, there wasn't
room to provide the required turning radius.
The proposed placement of the road will not impact any wetlands, however, it will
impact two surface waters. The first surface water is an intermittent, unnamed tributary
to the second surface water. Approximately 65 meters of the existing channel will be
filled. The channel is quite degraded having been cut through fill slopes of existing US
74 and has a silt/fine sand substrate. It is approximately 1 foot wide and 4 feet deep.
Given the conditions of this stream, NCDOT believes no mitigation is warranted.
2
The second is a perennial, unnamed tributary to the Pee-Dee River. This stream
has sand/gravel substrate with riffles and pools. Approximately 75 meters (250 feet) of
the existing stream channel will be lost/filled by construction of the service road.
However, it will be relocated into a new channel also approximately 75 meters in length.
The new channel will be designed to replicate the old channel. The following species
will be planted as part of the reforestation efforts:
On the sides of the channel:
Black willow (Salix nigra)
Silky dogwood (Corpus amomum)
On the top of the bank and adjacent flood plains:
Sweetgum (Liquidambar sytraciflua)
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
Black cherry (Prunus serotina)
River birch (Betula nigra)
The approximate placement of the plants and the planting densities are detailed on an
attached sheet as are details of the stream relocation.
It is anticipated that these activities will be authorized through a modification of
the Individual Permit Action ID # 199301490 and the WQC Project # 951250. NCDOT
hereby requests a modification of these permits to allow construction of Service Road
Number 3. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact
Mr. Michael Wood at [phone] extension 306.
17
Sinc?ter?
t ' ely,
/V, C' &'?3 ?'
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental
WDG/mw
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. R. L. Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Randy Wise, P.E., Roadside Environmental
_.. .. RATi ,TATE MO,ICT ROLRLNR N6 ?N? .MOLT,
N.C. I RF-2
RATR ,Rd.,,6 e?cwsT,w.
? TYPE 1 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED 0.91n TO 1.52m ON CENTER, RANDOM
SPACING, AVERAGING 1.22m ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 6726 PLANTS PER HECTARE.
? TYPE 2 STREAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE PLANTED 1.8m TO 3.Om ON CENTER, RANDOM
SPACING, AVERAGING 2.4m ON CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 1680 PLANTS PER HECTARE.
? NOTE: TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 STRFAMBANK REFORESTATION SHALL BE
PAID FOR AS "STREAMBANK REFORESTATION"
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION TYPICAL
TYPE II
TYPE I
3.4 MET.
i.zx
aer.
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
MI)n URE, TYPE, SIZE, AND FURNISH SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:
TYPE 1
50% SALIX NIGRA BLACK WILLOW 300mm - 460mm BR
50% CORNUS AMOMUM
TYPE 2
25% LIQUIDAMBA . STYRACIFLUA
25% PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
25% PRUNUS SEROTINA
25% BETULA NIGRA
SILKY DOGWOOD 300mm - 460mm BR
SWEETGUM 300mm - 460mm BR
SYCAMORE 300mm - 460mm BR
BLACK CHERRY 300mm - 460mm BR
RIVER BIRCH 300mm - 460mm BR
? SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR AREAS TO BE PLANTED
STREAMBANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET
N.C.D.O.T. -ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT

Ff £f ££S?SF I??Ef £E£?
.. 14fffffff ifeF: rf:
i
LOOP 'C ?' I ,? ? r
PIS ea
es 5T 217 .3? 3 cb co (IQ
- 70.000
Ls
a N , f v' I
U 46,675
V 2J-541 A)
?lb
•
0 E)
?-PROP.fYW FENCE cAAoE arum ro ONAIN ¢ 75.Om TAPER
aEUOVE N. I C,U4 )jar TO EXISTING
??.,..ml -•..
? PLUG ltf'? d" mm .4rF.R LINE
s 14 1J n r Q4NC FOR GVERHEAD
SW ASSEMSLr
14
--?
--_
PLUG z nsr
V E aEw I ?uovE (N _ C4
2 AST Z
+ US 14 1J w aSr ??? ?-•
L.
REU r,
?-• nE
9350 -? uElj 9EaM sNa)LOEN aEPM GUtiEH r1
-L2- STA. 21 •a0
a s+ i923Tm (631() c P cn
zd Kss m n IT. rare
Ads :o c s.oo+
a >< A i

T
oE
/
•
f -coNc
3
m •
Eve S
j/
Ly,1SS
?1?
•L%/ PP a9PSY ff 5'
J
I 18I73m f59b2'3• F,
-? ms ta' X OO
P P
? 1 RICHMOND COUNTY
BOO PAGE
K
P d 6
PARCEL N0. FOTI-S
T
AX
KEY N0. R512A-10 4.72.

N V arch a2-5Om 19268'

SEE IT91CAL TT 1
sss mr:r.
14
•36543 -L2-
PRDP.WW FENCE 33J53m 11061
RAMP 'A' f! -o SRSRVC I
m Pls Ste 17.50.481
' ro n IJLWm 14265'
es - Ir 26
10..,P
rn
u ; 80.000
U - 46J71
V - 32.076 ?v
L C/l. CHEER $ PROP(, LI
JAMES HUNTLEY. JR r- J
BOOK 558 PACE ,359 ;1
TAX PARCEL NO.FO7/52
KEY NO. RSIZA-11
/
MAYNIE C. NICHOLS
HERS. ET. AL.
f
IS
pc? 10.47718
?? r ?V2Fr1?
f?SRVGRD.3
50T ?"J Arm
PI STA 10,57 5?2 1
IR - 70.000
l 1 T • 9789
C.
.
?T-P- 100- c()
-5i-!c-Er i or 3
CHARLES ].SELLERS AND
JOHN F CRANLEY
BOOK 465 PAGE 176
TAX PARCEL NO. F07/61
KET NO. R512A-2 }
-L2-
?. a -12?6?673
225712
5
T 113.325
R -1013712
SE - 05
RUNOFF -60
EXIST. R/m C
W
PEiXRNL
.0 004 -L2- wEAro °ll ?`
567m (S'1 C ?F1NIr
P.WW FENCE 65 "
h)I.
ST r y A IX.
L.I? ?•Sta ~
^"j .r ^r 11.0
r
CLAW RIP RAP,
f^ O LV CLASS I
36.3 TONS
F ? 62.i SM FF
417 CNANNEL
A TYPICAL VV
I \ f / i
TDE
I •63DW SRVC RD 3
49DWm (149351
I 8010 0
ZOiso,
I'
i
/ N

?r

I

' 7o.n..

rnwLII NEhEHENCE NO
TR I R-51 2A
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
5 0 1 m ?.-A CARO.",
??. SCALE 5 lam' ,
ONST.REV- p F7CINE??4?+r j
gy
.
p, ?'
/11 REV.
z?-91
s
KEENER ENGINEERIN(
2 T
I
DURHAM
.NC
-L2-
t
-L2- l ?
POI St/2 51 g'•2
r0
Pls Sto 28.03.676 L - 1951
Ob" T 97-%7
Ls - 60LOO
3
t - 869541
R

76
307
-
U SE - 7
p
29245
V - 60 0
RUN0F
F -
• PROa WW FE}IICE c3 ,
• z
c
p L
LLJ
? ,?? _ _ ?OOmm MA7FP Ilr•.
- - 70'A?.1(P (wE -
!145((j ()f, : P11AS1 AS'BUI( t
PICMAI0 N0 C(IIINtY *A(ER SYSTEM
5NEL r 5 r+>P Np. a
1 F ? IH00 C RArSE 7W
S110ULOCP OERM OUTLET
REMOVE ! a 67 28.OC
C)
• U

T2 W 300mm FUNNCL
DRAM II7ELEION
r
PLAM PIP RAP`,-CLASS B
i ?••^.. I.a TONS. 3.3 SM FF
O JPCC - 11.50.375 SRVC RQ j Ns w a4 -
TOE PROTECTION
SEE TYPICAL ¦W
RpP.R/N
/? / a \ En =
S
k.l
P
m
H. BRONSON BRIM
BOOK 634 PAGE 822
R TAX PARCEL NO. FO7/4B
KEY N0. R512A-7
SRVC. RD. 3 -
L2 Pl STA 11.38.061
Zi O - 21722'324' RT.
3 R - 70DW
T -12580
L - 24894
SRVC. RD. 3
PI STA 10.97.991
0 - 3217'525' LT.
R - 70D00
T - 20269
L - 39.459
CHAtiNI;L DI:TAII I
5R3'C I(D :STA. IP •'N TO lP•9s
RD 3
! 7
.9 (Z A
1
D
RE5_';A0 NICHOL? 1.1CUAI
BO^r. 61A 'AGE 398
Tt.\ T)!' -"I NC_ F07/47
Jl?-?Lr ? o? 3
O
0
O
O
n
IT
7
CO,
CV
Q
N
I
(V
J
I

\ / 4 0 JAMGS 5EWC.94i T
PQI s to 29.3
i /
JI/
1 1 •?? I R- 869.541 r
RUN,
RUNOFF 60
Si{'
mm
co t
c a+
a ?
Z

Iii-LCt4v)oNr'-) Co 'L r 3 of 3

t
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
December 21, 1998
Action ID No. 199301490, TIP No. R-512A, Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass, Richmond County,
North Carolina.
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference your letter dated November 13, 1998 requesting a permit modification for the
construction of Service Road Number 3, R-512A, on a tributary of the Pee Dee River, Richmond
County, North Carolina.
The proposed permit modification to the subject permit will allow construction of Service
Road 3 located on R-512A near the intersection of Ramp "A" with US 74. Service Road
Number 3 is necessary to allow Richmond County access to a substation located on its property
in the vicinity of Ramp "A". Additionally, location of Service Road 3 is restricted in this area
due to control of access requirements.
Specifically, The proposed permit modifications to the subject permit are as follows:
1. Construction of that portion of Service Road 3 which will cross a perennial, unnamed
tributary to the Pee Dee River as shown on the attached drawings. Construction of the service
road will result in the relocation of approximately 250 feet of existing stream (shown as "Site 2"
on the drawings) into a new channel located along the base of Service Road 3. The new channel
will be constructed to replicate the existing channel. Following relocation of the stream,
replanting the area will be accomplished as specified in your letter of November. 13, 1998.
Your DA permit is hereby modified for the changes described above and in your
November 13, 1998 letter. All other conditions of your Department of the Army permit shall
remain in full force and effect.
Finally, NCDOT is reminded that in accordance with our letter of December 16, 1997 that
20 acres of additional wetland mitigation, in the form of restoration, must be provided prior to
completion of project construction in order to satisfy the mitigation requirements for this project.
Regulatory Division
-2-
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Wayne Wright
Chief, Regulatory Division
Enclosure
1. Ltr, NCDOT, Nov 13,1998
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. David Cox
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
?IAr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and
Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
BCF: CESAW-RG/Franklin
CESAW-RG-L/Mclendon
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name NC DOT - US 74 ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET
Project' Number 95 1250
Recvd From DOT
Received Date 12/5/95 Recvd By Region
Project Type ROAD CONSTRUCTION
11/23/98
County RICHMOND
County2
Region Fayetteville
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
IND BLHO Y O N 92 13-39-(10) _F__ 030716 59.42 ?-F-c
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Restore SWF 83.20 F-
Enhance SWF 91.50 F_-
Preserve SWF 14.90 F-
Is Mitigation required? Q Y 0 N
Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Comments:
Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
This is an amendment to the oreognal 40 4permit and 401 cert of April 1, 1 997- A s indicated in the
letter to Da the DOT has to bu
vid Timpy ild a service road that they appare ntly d idn't anticipate. (This
is needed t .,
o provide across to a psi g station.) Given the terrain, it is re ason able to believe that
all of the re q sted fin is actually needed - However, I disagree with DOT's conte ntion that the
"surface wa fer site #1" does not warrant mitigation. Their correspondence i ndica tes it is a degraded
intermittent stream (USGS maps show a pond fed continuous blue line, an d I be lieve it may be
Hare it is a surface wa
In any cme tw and should require ' 'gation f or the entire length of
stream from ,
the existing
p*pe outlet to th e confluence with "surface water #2"
The #2 stre _
am is a perennial unnamed tr ibuta j wath considerable flow, Bo th stre ams are somewhat
incised and have little if any streambank wetland (The letter indicates that there is none-). The DOT
argument t hat this is the only reasonable alternati ye is probably it argu ment i n this .as
H6weyer
a pproval of the project should be contingent on mitigation for eve ry foo t of tr .am im ap ct;_
,
inc ' g th e antics length of stream #1, f rom existing Hwy_ 74 to the #2 str eam.
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name NC DOT - US 74 ROCKINGHAM-HAMLET County RICHMOND
Project Number 95 1250 Regional Contact: Ken Averitte
Date: 12/18/98
Comments (continued from page 1):
stream imp, including the entire length of surface water #1 from the existin U? S 74 ape outlet to
the confluence with surface water #2.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, N18?t 1" Health and Natural Resources • 0
Division of Environmental Management A&41
rr
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Adobmdmbmdm 1111111111M
1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary ED E H N 1?
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
C?Z
April 1, 1997
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
NC DOT
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512)
Project #951250, COE #199301490
Richmond County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3094 issued to the N.C. Department of
Transportation dated 1 April 1997. This certification replaces the one issued on 7 January 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Vreston Howard, Jr.E.
Attachments
951250.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
Mr.John Dorney
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Enviro. Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section.0500 to N.C. Dept. of
Transportation resulting in 24.058 hectares (59.42 acres) of permanent wetland impact and 0.688
hectares (1.70 acres) of temporary wetland impact in Richmond County pursuant to an application
filed on the 29th day of November of 1995, 13th day of September 1996, and 14 March 1997 to
construct the US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters
of Hitchcock Creek, Cape Fear Branch, 3 tributaries to Solomons Creek, Solomon Creek, Marks
Creek and Black Branch Creek in conjunction with the proposed, development will not result in a
violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of
North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application
and conditions hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase
in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (50
NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs in trout waters).
2. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation
will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
3. Prior to the commencement of any roadway work on TIP R-0512A, _5, C, D, E
and F, the North Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally
binding contract to purchase or option to buy the Long Swamp mitigation site,
consisting of approximately 200 acres.
4. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on R-0512D, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally binding contract to
purchase or option to buy the Gibson Pond mitigation site that will provide, at a
minimum, 30 acres of wetland preservation, or 6 acres of wetland restoration, or
12 acres of wetland enhancement to compensate for the wetland impacts at Marks
Creek and the mechanized clearing beyond the fill slopes.
5. No roadway construction on TIP 0512A shall be commenced prior to the
preparation of a Final Mitigation plan by the permittee, and approval of that plan
by the Wilmington District Engineer.
6. All construction and planting activities at the Long Swamp mitigation site shall be
completed prior to the completion of roadway construction on TIP R-0512E and
TIP R-0512F.
7. At Black Branch Creek, between station 110+66 and 111+43, the permittee or its
contractor shall cause to be installed one (1) 48-inch pipe culvert through the
causeway fill on the west side of the box culvert and two (2) 48-inch pipe
culverts on the east side of the box culvert. The culverts will be placed generally
parallel to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box
culvert and the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at
least one (1) foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
8. At Black Branch Creek, at station 111+00, all spoil material from the excavation
of the new creek channel between the outfall of the box culvert to the existing
creek channel shall be deposited on high ground.
9. At Solomons Creek between station 126+50 and stations 127+45, the
permittee shall cause to be installed two (2) 48-inch pipe culverts in the causeway
fill on the west side of the box culvert and three (3) 48-inch pipe culverts on the
east side of the box culvert. The pipe culverts shall be placed generally parallel
to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and
the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1)
foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
10. At Solomons Creek, at station 126+60, all spoil material from the excavation of
the new creek channel on the north and south side of the road shall be deposited
on high ground.
11. At Marks Creek, between station 177+75 and station 178+80, the permittee shall
cause to be installed four (4) 60-inch pipe culverts in the causeway fill on the
west side of Marks Creek. The culverts shall be placed generally parallel to the
box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and the
wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1) foot
below the grade of the existing floodplain. The relocated stream must have the
same pre-construction width and depth.
12. Between station 158+00 and station 159+00 the permittee shall install one (1)
additional 36-inch pipe culvert on the east side of the box culvert. The exact
location of the additional pipe culvert shall be at the discretion of the permittee.
13. All stream relocations (post-construction) must have pre-construction width and
depth.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of
the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 1st day of April 1997
DIVIS N OF WATER QUALITY
?Pr on Howar , Jr. P.
WQC 3094
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
6
Division of Environmental Management A410
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
C?,Z
April 1, 1997
Mr. H. Franklin Vick
NC DOT
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512)
Project #951250, COE #199301490
Richmond County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3094 issued to the N.C. Department of
Transportation dated 1 April 1997. This certification replaces the one issued on 7 January 1997.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
.?f
Vrston Howard, Jr. E.
Attachments
951250.wgc
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Wilmington DWQ Regional Office
-Mr.,,.Jghn I -9mey
Mr. John Parker, Division of Coastal Management
Central Files
Enviro. Sciences Branch, 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post.consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to N.C. Dept. of
Transportation resulting in 24.058 hectares (59.42 acres) of permanent wetland impact and 0.688
hectares (1.70 acres) of temporary wetland impact in Richmond County pursuant to an application
filed on the 29th day of November of 1995, 13th day of September 1996, and 14 March 1997 to
construct the US 74 Rockingham - Hamlet Bypass (TIP No. R-512).
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters
of Hitchcock Creek, Cape Fear Branch, 3 tributaries to Solomons Creek, Solomon Creek, Marks
Creek and Black Branch Creek in conjunction with the proposed, development will not result in a
violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of
North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301,
302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application
and conditions hereinafter set forth.
Condition(s) of Certification:
That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase
in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (50
NTUs in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTUs in
all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTUs in trout waters).
2. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation
will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities.
3. Prior to the commencement of any roadway work on TIP R-0512A, .$, C, D, E
and F, the North Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally
binding contract to purchase or option to buy the Long Swamp mitigation site,
consisting of approximately 200 acres.
4. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on R-0512D, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally binding contract to
purchase or option to buy the Gibson Pond mitigation site that will provide, at a
minimum, 30 acres of wetland preservation, or 6 acres of wetland restoration, or
12 acres of wetland enhancement to compensate for the wetland impacts at Marks
Creek and the mechanized clearing beyond the fill slopes.
5. No roadway construction on TIP 0512A shall be commenced prior to the
preparation of a Final Mitigation plan by the permittee, and approval of that plan
by the Wilmington District Engineer.
6. All construction and planting activities at the Long Swamp mitigation site shall be
completed prior to the completion of roadway construction on TIP R-0512E and
TIP R-0512F.
7. At Black Branch Creek, between station 110+66 and 111+43, the permittee or its
contractor shall cause to be installed one (1) 48-inch pipe culvert through the
causeway fill on the west side of the box culvert and two (2) 48-inch pipe
culverts on the east side of the box culvert. The culverts will be placed generally
parallel to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box
culvert and the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at
least one (1) foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
8. At Black Branch Creek, at station 111+00, all spoil material from the excavation
of the new creek channel between the outfall of the box culvert to the existing
creek channel shall be deposited on high ground.
9. At Solomons Creek between station 126+50 and stations 127+45, the
permittee shall cause to be installed two (2) 48-inch pipe culverts in the causeway
fill on the west side of the box culvert and three (3) 48-inch pipe culverts on the
east side of the box culvert. The pipe culverts shall be placed generally parallel
to the box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and
the wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1)
foot below the grade of the existing floodplain.
10. At Solomons Creek, at station 126+60, all spoil material from the excavation of
the new creek channel on the north and south side of the road shall be deposited
on high ground.
11. At Marks Creek, between station 177+75 and station 178+80, the permittee shall
cause to be installed four (4) 60-inch pipe culverts in the causeway fill on the
west side of Marks Creek. The culverts shall be placed generally parallel to the
box culverts and equally spaced between the edge of the box culvert and the
wetland/upland boundary. The invert of the culverts shall be at least one (1) foot
below the grade of the existing floodplain. The relocated stream must have the
same pre-construction width and depth.
12. Between station 158+00 and station 159+00 the permittee shall install one (1)
additional 36-inch pipe culvert on the east side of the box culvert. The exact
location of the additional pipe culvert shall be at the discretion of the permittee.
13. All stream relocations (post-construction) must have pre-construction width and
depth.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification.
This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of
the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be
in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 1st day of April 1997
DIVIS N OF WATER QUALITY
?Pr on Howar , Jr. P.
WQC 3094

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. 60X25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
March 14, 1997
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. Cliff Winefordner
Chief, Southern Section
Dear Sir:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
4

SUBJECT: Richmond County, US 74 Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass from East of Pee Dee River
to East of SR 1615; T.I.P. No. R-0512; State Project No. 6.589001T, DOA
Action ID No. 199301490.
As you are aware, the Corps of Engineers issued a permit for the construction of the proposed
Rockingham-liamlet Bypass on January 29, 1997. This permit included 25 special conditions, several of
which referred to wetland mitigation requirements for the project. This letter is provided as an update on
the N.C. Department of Transportation's (NCDOT) efforts to comply with these permit conditions, and
to request relief from one aspect of Special Condition (e).
Special Condition (c) requires that the NCDOT obtain a legally binding contract to purchase or option to
buy the Long Swamp Mitigation Site. The NCDOT acquired this site in fee simple by three deeds
recorded in Hoke County on January 24, 1997. The NCDOT has already provided you with copies of
these deeds.
Special Condition (d) requires that the NCDOT obtain a legally binding contract to purchase or option to
buy an additional mitigation site in order to commence construction on R-0512D. The NCDOT now has
si<,ned options to buy from all three landowners at the Gibson Pond mitigation site. Staff of the Corps of
Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Quality have indicated that this site is acceptable for mitigating
impacts of the Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass.
Special Condition (e) requires that the NCDOT finalize the mitigation plans for both the Long Swamp
Site and the Gibson Pond Site and obtain approval of the District Engineer prior to the commencement of
any roadway construction on R-0512A, B, C, D, E. The mitigation plans for both of these sites are
currently being developed by the firm of Environmental Services, Inc.
Unfortunately, these plans will not be available in time to meet scheduled project lettings. The let
schedule for the various segments of R-0512 is as follows:

f

2
Project Section Let Date
R-0512 F 12/96 (under construction)
E 7/97
D 5/97
C 6/97
B 8/97
A 9/97
Clearly, the final, approved mitigation plans will not be available in time for the scheduled May and June
lettings of R-0512D and R-0512C. The implementation schedule for the Long Swamp Mitigation Site
indicates that the last of the planting will be completed during the winter of 1998-1999. This will occur
as long as the plan is completed prior to October 1997. Earlier completion of the plan (e.g. by May
1997) will not permit planting any earlier. However, some 30 acres of enhancement will be done during
the winter 1997-1998.
A great deal of progress has been made in complying with the conditions of the permit for R-0512. The
NCDOT has also met the requirements of Special Condition (d) restricting the commencement of R-
05 12D. This project is considered a high priority by the local people, and was selected for special review
by the Mitigation Partnering Team. Due to the importance of this project, the NCDOT requests relief
from Special Condition (e) to allow construction of R-0512D and R-0512C to commence as currently
scheduled.
Thank you for your assistance with this important, matter. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.
Gordon Cashin at [phone] extension 278.
Sincerely,
'k& L1,1-&1%-,
H. Franklin Vick, PE,'Nlanager
Planning and Environmental Branch
HFV/plr
cc: Mr. Scott McLendon, COE
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Thomas Welborn, EPA
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. F. E. Whitesell, P.E. Division 8 Engineer
Mr. Archie Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E. Roadway Design
Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E. Program Development
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. William Rogers, P.E., Structure Design

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
March 18, 1997
Action ID No. 199301490, TIP R-0512A,B,C,D,E,F, Rockingham-Hamlet Bypass
Mr. Frank Vick
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Planning and Environmental Branch
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Vick:
Reference your letter dated March 14, 1997, in which you requested
modification of your Department of the Army (DA) permit to allow construction
of R-0512D and R-0512C prior to the completion of a final mitigation plan for
the Long Swamp and Gibson Pond mitigation sites. It is our understanding that
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has acquired the Long
Swamp site and purchase options on the Gibson Pond site. Furthermore, it is
our understanding that the mitigation plan for the Long Swamp site will be
complete in late spring/early summer of 1997.
Based on the progress that has been made in acquisition of the mitigation
properties, development of the mitigation plan, and our commitment to the
Mitigation Partnering Team, special conditions (d) and (e) are hereby modified
as follows:
d. Prior to the commencement of any work in wetlands on R-0512A, the
North Carolina Department of Transportation shall have a legally binding
contract to purchase or option to buy, and an additional mitigation site
acceptable to the District Engineer that will provide, at a minimum, 30 acres
of wetland preservation, or 6 acres of wetland restoration, or 12 acres of
wetland enhancement.
e. No roadway construction on TIP 0512A shall be commenced prior to the
preparation of a Final Mitigation plan by the permittee, a d approval of that
plan by the Wilmington District Engineer.
All other. conditions of your DA permit remain in full force and effect.
r'

Questions or comments may be addressed to Scott McLendon, Wilmington
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
5 Terry R. Youngbluth
Colonel, U.S. Army
District Engineer
Copies Furnished:
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief
Wetlands Protection Section - Region IV
Water Management Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
100 Alabama Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. John Hefner
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mr. Franklin T. McBride, Program Manager
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
1142 I-85 Service Road
Creedmoor, North Carolina 27522
2