19960191 Ver 1_Complete File_19960221

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
1 February 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application
North Carolina Department of Transportation
WA5N1NGr0NEL
OFFICE
AZ. Ix
Project Location: On SR 1924 at Bridge #38 over South Creek near Aurora in Beaufort
County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing bridge with a new re-enforced concrete bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 22 February 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481, Ext 275. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data is requested.
REPLY _V This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed Date 1
FE F1
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N, Schecter, Director
1 February 1996
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
FROM: John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit Application
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation
WASytNGTONEOFFICE:
FEB 0 1 15
!%Aa
Project Location: On SR 1924 at Bridge #38 over South Creek near Aurora in Beaufort
County, North Carolina
Proposed Project: To replace the existing bridge with a new re-enforced{ concrete bridge.
Please indicate below your position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by 22 February 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
David Gossett at 946-6481, Ext 275. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting
data is requested.
REPLY _V This office has no objection to the project as proposed.
This office has no comment on the proposed project.
This office approves of the project only if the recommended
changes are incorporated. See attached.
This office objects to the project for reasons described in the
attached comments.
Signed Date 1 q1 9
AdlbMdMftgdft
1:3 F= F1
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: North Carolina Department of Transportation
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: On SR 1924 at Bridge #38 over South Creek near the Town of
Aurora in Beaufort County
Photo Index - 1989: No photo 1984: No photo
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2,661,500 Y: 559,100 Aurora LL
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 26 January 1996
Was Applicant Present - No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 25 January 1996
Office - Washington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Beaufort County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public highway bridge
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge
Planned - Bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 348.48 sq. ft.
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C) Other
Openwater 348.48 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: ±696.96 sq. ft. or 0.016 acre
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: C-Sup-NSW Open: No
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replace an existing bridge across South Creek
with another bridge.
.•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge #38 over South Creek
Beaufort County
Environmental setting
The project site is NC DOT Bridge #38 on SR 1924 over South Creek, southeast of the
Town of Aurora in Beaufort County, North Carolina. Located at the site is a ±70' long bridge
which has a width of 19.3'. The navigational clearance underneath the existing bridge is 3.5'
at normal water. Recently, NC DOT has paved SR 1924 up to both ends of the bridge,
however, no work has been conducted on the bridge. At the project site South Creek has been
channelized to a depth of 11.0' at normal water. The channelization has resulted in a spoil berm
extending parallel to the creek along its east side. Other than the spoil berm, road bed, and road
shoulders the entire area is vegetated predominately by wooded swamp consisting of various
gums, cypress, myrtles and red maples. No coastal wetlands (marsh) is located at the site.
Project proposal
The applicant is proposing the following:
The replacement of the existing bridge, which will be entirely removed, with a new re-
enforced concrete bridge along the existing alignment. The new bridge will have a total length
of 105' and will be 28' wide. Navigation clearance will not change, remaining at 3.5' above
the NWL.
To construct the longer bridge, excavation will occur at both the east and west ends of
the existing approaches. This will be highground excavation. This approach excavation will
result in the placement of fill below the NWL within a ditch at the southwest corner of the
bridge. Also, this work will result in the excavation of a wetland area also at the southwest
corner of the bridge.
Environmental impact
The project as proposed will have the following environmental impacts:
(1) The excavation of ±348.48 sq. ft. of open water area as a result of approach
work at the southwest corner of the new bridge.
(2) The filling of ±348.48 sq. ft. of wooded swamp as a result of approach work at
the southwest corner of the new bridge. This area is vegetated mostly with red
maples and myrtles.
David L. Gossett - Washington Regional Office - 31 January 1996
t

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TP ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS .
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
January 22, 1995
Mr. David Gossett
Division of Coastal Management
Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Post Office Box 1507
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Dear Mr. Gossett:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
Subject: Beaufort County, Replacement of Bridge Nos. 38 on SR 1924 over South Creek
and 105 on SR 1326 over Broad Creek, State Project No. 5.1551.
Enclosed is a copy of the CAMA permit application, drawings and a copy of the fee check
for the above referenced projects. The proposed action will include the demolition and
replacement of bridge Nos. 38 over South Creek and 105 over Broad Creek. The bridges will be
replaced along existing alignment and will not require temporary detours.
The work at bridge number 38 across South Creek will require the relocation of the
roadside ditch. The fill in surface waters will be 0.008 acres and the excavation in wetlands will be
0.008 acres. No impacts to surface waters or wetlands are anticipated for the bridge (#105)
across Broad Creek.
The NCDOT is requesting that the proposed work be authorized under a Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permit. By copy of this letter we are requesting the review and
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification from the Division of Environmental Management
and a Section 404 permit form the US Army Corps of Engineers. If you have any questions
regarding this request, please do not hesitate to call Scott P. Gottfried at 919-733-7844, Ext. 307.
Sincer y,
F anklin Vick, P.E., Manager
HFV/sg Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. Jimmy Lee, PE, Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, PE, Structure Design
Mr. Rick Shirley, PE, Division 2 Engineer
" A
FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Aurora
a. Landowner:
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation
Address P. O. Box 25201
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27611 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City State
Zip Day Phone
Fax
C. Project name (if any) Beaufort County
Bridge Number 38
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowier(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County Beaufort
C. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1929
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? Yes X No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek sound, bay) South Creek
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace bridge with new bridge
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? Both
C. Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages.
Public Transportation
Existing bridge is in poor condition. Replace
bridge along existing alignment. Construction
will utilize typical roadway construction
equipment and method.
Revised 03/95
CORM DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
M. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
n.
C. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW
or NWL Natural Ground Elev. 97.5 (assumed datum)
Natural Ground Elev. 5.0(+/-) (USGS Quad)
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Sandy Loam. Organic Muck
e. Vegetation on tract Various wetland and
upland vegetation
f.. Man-made features now on tract Bridge
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land use
plan)
Conservation Transitional
Developed X Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
No zoning for area
is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? Yes No N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? Yes X No
If yes, by whom?
Describe location and type of discharges to
waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
effluent, "wash down", and residential
discharges.)
Surface runoff along project.
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
* A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes -No
Coastal (marsh) Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? No
(Attach documentation, ifavailable)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Revised 03/95
CORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
* A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See Sheet 3 of 3
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON
LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The proejct will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the ?'- day of , 19 ?.
Print Name H. Fr in Vick P.E.
Signature ?X7
andowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
_ DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
- DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain) N/A
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 105'
1. BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 28'
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands N/A
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
Re-enforced concrete
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
South Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 11'
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 3.5'
X Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 70' reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 19.3' opening? Yes X No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain
bridge 3.5'
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) All of existing bridge
will be removed allowing for new bridge
in. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes, (0.008 acres)
(1) Length of area to be excavated 70'
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated 5'
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards 26 cubic vards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL X Yes No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated 35'
(2) Width of area to be excavated 28'
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards 120 cubic yards for bridge aubtments
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the Along existing roadway bed
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
Along existing roadway bed
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No X Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? X Yes No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 70'
(2) Width of area to be filled 5'
(3) Purpose of fill 26 cubic yards - fill in adjacent
ditch for road widening. No fill in South Cr.
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes, N/A
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 70'
(2) Width of area to be filled 5'
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill to raise grade
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? By stringent erosion
control - NCDOT Standards
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Bridge Construction Equipment
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT. H. Franklin Vick. P.E., Beaufort Co., Bridle 38
Applicant or Project Name
gnature
//I/
Date
Revised 03/95

CRfwr K.: tldr P.
EAward Cieei? LA+iu.d'
vance0oro, `\ - %__
- i
S Fort,Bainwell •. Rwaa(?oyal r ? ii?lS \ \ ? G.
0 ; Einul CaYtonN? V •?Hotruuee_ \
Dover 9 2 skin' - , 'Mesic 3,
` " \\ 1 O
Holly"Ite
R n N ' . r Q R 7+2'g' :.?k '
I\ AFC Co.eCity aslNV Cash ) y 7 13 . / :: a ere 4s h. lJ ?/ `r, .^?• ?+`"
1 + Mari0el .°y R. ovr_w
9 7 i Craora Bayboro / . f a \
Olympia f Oora Ft e i \
L+ `rata 670 6rid[lton Al lance S;
41 + w her r .a«i P A M
•? a0ata •.!?
' RK a es G Mena tonsallf. i . •' •'•i ? `?.;:,:?:.?:. `ot e?+ 'i;=i.: ? t_`-C/v'?E'/ -
+ Rhems 1 ' S too -' rr p _ , = 1` r v d? o4y ?i
T taw i°'+?a + 5a /Rmrme '•3`?'"?F w ,i>. i coke, /
I r 'r
rt ` W $ I ?_ y ` -:." + _ # ?Y:?' Boy s ` *
WWI
Riverdale ?• f Jan 71- edar fslan
i ,-
li ver oe 'F ,` r 'a Ta?" * °? 1
FMANN T I CROA`fAN Coitin Y:M+`Ei esoti ' saRi
,,?? ; - _ :: R+r• r?ePcn
+?' rj?''?WA/r° ?; CmrrA' ? I r • ei . - ? rY•-7 Z
MaysvilleNAT t L b
Z Y e,5. + lane' "t.•.
.r IONAt
OREST Bat de I r. Lie, • "S 3 ?tA i - * Orurn'/n/ = ».~': Vi`rf' -
Ti rGae° ,O r - _ as?__ _ .Y ,4. 1? cake _
0 5 10 ^ 20 30
[?) SCALE OF MILES ONE IMf7!`i' ::J,i•_ ' t`° •'.:
EQUALS AP?kp1(. 13 M0.E5 .:.
0 10 .20 s0 40 ' ti SCALE OF KILOMETERS Of* INCH EQUALS APPRO.21 KILOMETERS
L
•--?-??,p?m I MILE IS EQUAL TO 1.609 KILOMETERS "' • - -
-TV
L \.

no
,4 o
/VP JL)
\icy CJ
end o? Rb _ _ I6 cmp
? ", ?? CC 4TH
$ .NAIL) /? 3G '
?eTRW
t ?
TO 3
?-- }yPtL --}
C- - - - CL, z tip tffP
0
? F h L J C-N/V?f /1/ 1 ? i B F I ?t ?rl
7) E ib CXto 77W 6 , 1D,
SCALE: I 9 !o I1
I I _
//07 '• G RA C ~ lfiSEfl To (kST-H/0*3S /0503><ew
,,Ap1NrA?,4 jF.xrSTtA/r .
DER C,)EA9ANcE• ,
O/v? ? CAD t E1>3SLfi?I? tSI FJsS?A
C?4viN G ?r?DE
PROPOSE A &TTOM 0? Ex: sr; ?S
`k G R A DES anti Proposed Or. C/- . zr k/P ,e AP
o t9 ? %,
o - - ' a O o0
29
NG.J F°
i
?- o. R.
? : ?
CL.II Zip R ( 51-a i''S

i ER5 0 0c
y ?? 7L 141VP
ava??cn
Er
5 C.26e ?
PfdPOSCd Qr. -
/ma
c
?3t. --- -
gx"sf;45 - i Avc'?r?GE ?AILy Flaw=
FXCRY• A $ o Vc
- N VA) t_ = 0 --c
/ A - A ' u
S FCr/ o ./V ()ev%oTe4 &Cav. FILL 0 bo
Above d NL ??
A-R \y????l tV ?J L _r_DS?L
pENoTFS ExeAY. IA *erc,iA (.oo4a
pEIVOTFS F1« BFLOv( NwL-'.
•
o
a SCALE: 1 "= 5o No tz. 0 YtF-M
too r'
iV G - -
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANS.

n/wL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
. BEAUFORT COUNTY
E4.9 7.5 BRIDGE # 33 ON SR-1924 `
5
90 2 25? OVER GUM SWAMP CREEK
1
L r
I I '
SHEET-I-OF_3_FEB.95

PROPRETY OWNERS
AO'. MAX F. THOMPSON JR.
5313 EDINGTON LANE
RALEIGH, N.C. 27604
BOt JAMES B. PARKER JR.
RT.#3 BOX 681
BEAUFORT, N.C. 28516
CO.' WEYERHARUSER CO.
C/O BARBARA KHOURY
P.O. BOX 1391
NEW BERN, N.C. 28560
DO'. ETLES & ALLEN HENDRIES
P.O. BOX 96
AUORA, N.C. 27806