19960081 Ver 1_Complete File_19960116

cl
State of North Carolina W
Department of Environmen il]
He
alth and Natural ResouC .1S r 1 • 7A--
Division c° Coastal Managemen JAN 2 6 M'S
James B.-iunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathar. B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. -Schecter, Director
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
....: .....................,
ID EHNF1
January 24, 1996
Mr. A. Preston Howard, P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
John R. Parker, Jr.
Major Permits Processing Coordinator

I it.
JAN 2 6 '996
DIVISION OF
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
INC Department of Transportation
@ the end of NC Hwy 12 & adjacent to the Pamlico Sound, community of Cedar
Island
Proposed Project: to expand the Cedar Island Ferry Terminal by enlarging the existing boat basin and
breakwater system
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
February 14, 1996. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Charles Jones
at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY:
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED
DATE
P.O. Bcx 769, 3441 Arendell St., Morehead City, North Carorna 28557 Courier #11-12-09
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Ea-lal opportunity Affirmative Action employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources AW4'y
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C) E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
February 26, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee .
Through: John Dome
From: Eric Galambv?
Subject: EA/FONSI for Improvements to Cedar Island Ferry
Carteret County
State Project DOT No. 6.161021, TIP # F-2416
EHNR # 96-0461, DEM # 11163
The subject document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401
Water Quality Certification for activities which impact of waters of the state including
wetlands. The document states that wetlands will not be impacted but 7.2 acres of
waters will be impacted.
DOT is reminded that endorsement of an EA/FONSI by DEM would not preclude the
denial of a 401 Certification upon application if wetland and water impacts have not
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable.
Questions regarding the 401 Certification should be directed to Eric Galamb (733-
1786) in DEM's Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch.
cedferry.fon
cc: Monica Swihart
F?AXEp
FEB 2 61996
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
To: John Dorney
Planning Branch
060081
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW
REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEWER: GREGSO
WQ SUPERVISOR: ADKIN
DATE: February 13, 1 6
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKING
PERMIT YR: 96 PERMIT NO.: 960081 COUNTY: Carteret
PROJECT NAME: NC DOT - Cedar Island Ferry Terminal
PROJECT TYPE: Dredging PERMIT TYPE: CAMA
COE #: N/A DOT#: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: January 26, 1996
REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030410
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Pamlico Sound
CLASS: SA NSW STREAM INDEX #: 27-(118) ??.
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed <? FZp ?'FG
WL IMPACT: N/A WL TYPE: N/A Po V2 t2j
WL REQUESTED: N/A WL ACR EST: N/A 22
WL SCORE: N/A 6-
MITIGATION: N/A MITIGATION TYPE: N/A
MITIGATION SIZE: N/A RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: N/A ?s
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D:
.IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to expand the Cedar Island Ferry Terminal.
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #3025
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WATER: 1.99 WETLAND: N/A
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? No
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? No
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? Yes
960081.feb
Page Two
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: N/A MARINA SERVICES: N/A
OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A
(ATTACH A MARINA USE ATTAINABILITY EVAL.)
RECONVEMENDED CONDITIONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIONS:
Although the project will result in a substantial amount of fill below MHW a large portion
of this fill will still be subtidal. Additionally, a portion of this fill will be offset by the removal
of the two liberty ship hulls and by the removal of the existing north jetty. The area is currently
closed to the harvesting of shellfish.
It is recommended that the following conditions be incorporated into the CAMA Permit.
1. That the turbidity outside the immediate construction area not exceed 25 NTU.
2. That silt curtains and other erosion controls be in place prior to any excavation or filling.
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM-Charles Jones
John Parker
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE
/
p ;
1 MEZe___LDG:

FfFk O REF. NO. OR ROOM; BLDG.

.ACTION
?- NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? -NOTE AND -RETURN. TOME ? PER YOUR REQUEST _
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ?FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE' ME 'ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
_.;:?,
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
Project Review Form
Project Number: County:
Date:
I/ /_?
? Project located in 7th floor library
J )[ l l
3
Date Response Due (firm deadline):
? a i G=am ,(?- ?
? r4a;
This project is being reviewed as indicated below: 7 JIA 04,, 9'79'--P 5'--f9
Regional 0fficelPhone• Regional Office Area In-Hou Review
? Asheville ? All RIO Areas ? Soil and Water Marine Fisheries
Air Coastal Management Water Planning
El Fayetteville
Water ? Water Resources ? Environmental Health
? Mooresville

roundwater
G
X

Wildlife ?Solid Waste Management
V
El Raleigh Land Quality Engineer El Forest Resources El Radiation Protection
hi
t
? W ? Recreational Consultant ? Land Resources ? David Foster
on
ng
as
'??.?? ?Coastal Management Consultant Parks and Recreation ?Other (specify)
,L?,Wilmington ? Others /EbEnvironmental Management
? Winston-Salem PWS Monica Swihart
Manager Sign-Off/Region: Date: In-House Reviewer/Agency:
Response (check all applicable)
Regional Office response to be compiled and completed by Regional Manager.
? No objection to project as proposed
? Insufficient information to complete review
? Approve
? Permit(s) needed (permit files have been checked)
? Recommended for further development with recommendations. for
strengthening (comments attached)
? Recommended for further development if specific & substantive
changes incorporated by funding agency (comments
attachedlauthority(ies) cited)
In-House Reviewer complete individual response.
? Not recommended for further development for reasons
stated in attached comments (authority(ies) cited)
? Applicant has been contacted
? Applicant has not.been contacted
? Project Controversial (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement needed (comments attached)
? Consistency Statement not needed
? Full EIS must be required under the provisions of
NEPA and SEPA
? Other (specify and attach comments)
RETURN TO:
Melba McGee Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs
PS-104

STNE
S
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
February 26, 1996
Mr. Scott McLendon
Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, N.C. 28402-1890
Dear Mr. McLendon:
110
y'?tir ,1996
?s
NCDOT is in receipt of your February 6, 1996 letter which verified your receipt of the
permit application for dredging and construction at Cedar Island Ferry Terminal, and which further
requested additional information about the project. Reference paragraphs a, b, and c of your
letter, the following information should aid you in deciding approval for the permit:
Reference Paragraph a: Please refer to page 4 of the EA/FONSI, under "Alternative
Analysis." No other practicable alternatives, including upland alternatives, are available. The
alternative proposed by NCDOT is the least damaging alternative available.
Reference Paragraph b: Please refer to page 13 of the EA/FONSI under "Characteristics
of Wetlands and Surface Waters." No jurisdictional wetlands were observed within the project
area, therefore no impacts to wetlands will occur.
Reference Paragraph c: Please refer to page 4 of the EA/FONSI under "Summary of
Environmental Impacts." Note that some impacts of the project are actually positive, such as
additional habitat provided by the new stone material, or increased oxygenation of basin waters.
Any negative water resource impacts are minimal, with most being temporary. Terrestrial
disturbance will also be temporary. No wetland impacts will occur, and no submersed aquatic
vegetation is present in the project area. As stated on page 3 under "Environmental Commitments
and Permits," NCDOT will implement Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface
Waters, and Sedimentation Control for High Quality Waters. Therefore, because a minimal
amount of environmental disruption is anticipated, no mitigation is necessary or proposed.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 209.
Sincere
(??Oex?
Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
cc: NCDEM
GARLAND B. GARRETI' JR.
SECRETARY

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
N1.K;qA1?EHNF1
March 1, 1996
Carteret County
DEM Project # 960081
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Franklin Vick
N. C. Dept. of Transportation
Planning and Environmental Branch
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 25201
Dear Mr. Vick:
You have our approval to drake 333,000 square feet and fill 87,000 square feet of waters for the
purpose of expanding the Cedar Island Ferry Terminal, as you described in your application dated 26
January 1996. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General
Water Quality Certification Numb--r 3025.
This approval is only valid fcr the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this
approval to be valid, you must foLow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Silt curtains
and similar erosion control device, shall be in place prior to excavation or filling In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your prc?icct.
If you do not accept any of t-e conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory
hearing. You must act within 60 Lays of the date that you receive this letter. To risk for a hearing, send
a written petition which conforms =o Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office
of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the revitw of the Division of Environmental Management under Section 401
of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
1
re -ton Howard, Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps o Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Central Files
John Parker; DCM
960081.Itr
Environmental Sciences Branch, 44:1 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirma2ive Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Improvements to
Cedar Island Ferry Facility
Carteret County
TIP Project F-2416
State Project No. 6.161021
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
State Environmental Assessment/
Finding of No Significant Impact
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
in Compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act
For further information, contact:
Mr. H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
N.C. Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
bate ?J. O' uinn, P )E-, Ass stant Manager
Planning and tr!vrun Branch
>/8/91?
Z? 1;4"a
Date Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Project Planning Engineer
0 .••......... 4,
'•,
?;•OFESSIp? I 's
• a r'
• SE AL 0. Iz
18334 '
E.
y .•
Improvements to
Cedar Island Ferry Facility
Carteret County
TIP Project F-2416
State Project No. 6.161021
I. Type of Action
Pursuant to the requirements of the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, this is an
Administrative Action, combined State Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant
Action.
II. Purpose and Need
This project upgrades the existing Cedar Island Ferry Facility in Carteret County.
Estimated construction cost is $3,000,000. No land acquisition is required. See Figure 1 for
location. Figures 2 and 3 show existing site conditions.
The Cedar Island Ferry Terminal serves as an extension for NC 12, connecting Carteret
County with Hyde and Dare Counties at Ocracoke Island. The NC 12 corridor is vital to
commerce in the eastern counties, not only to Outer Banks regions, but also to inland businesses
which serve that area. The ferry terminal is a vital component of a regional transportation
system.
NC 12 is also the only evacuation route for the Outer-Banks in these counties. The Cedar
Island Ferry has been identified by the Carteret County Evacuation Plan as a primary factor in the
movement of vehicles from the Ocracoke Island area during times of emergency. Residents and
tourists from the Outer Banks must travel north through Manteo in order to access a bridge to the
mainland. This drive is over 80 miles from the Ocracoke Island Ferry Terminal. Unfortunately
NC 12 is known for its exposure to storm surge, often becoming submerged during the most
critical times of evacuation. Therefore, the N.C. Ferry System is sometimes the only evacuation
route from Ocracoke Island and from Hatteras Island. From Ocracoke Island, the Cedar Island
Ferry Terminal is the closest mainland terminal.. Therefore, during evacuation periods, the
capacity of the Cedar Island Ferry Facility is critical to public safety from the threat of hurricanes
and tropical storms.
The existing ferry facility was constructed in 1965 to accommodate two 160-foot vessels.
At present, four ferry vessels operate from the facility. Three vessels are 220 feet in length, and
one vessel is 160 feet in length. The Ferry Division plans to lengthen the 160-foot vessel to 220
feet, and is planning to purchase additional vessels.
Widening the basin will increase safety for the traveling public, state personnel, jetty and
dock structures, and the vessels themselves. The existing basin was originally designed to
accommodate two 160-foot vessels, with only one vessel operating in the basin at a time. Present

traffic volumes have required operation of a 220-foot vessel in the basin at the same time that one
or two vessels are docked. These large vessels are very restricted in their capability to maneuver,
a problem that is compounded by several vessels operating in the basin at once. Maneuverability
is further diminished by inclement weather, wave action, and strong winds.
Urgency of the terminal upgrade is based mainly upon safety and the condition of the
sunken "Liberty Ships" which help to form the north-side jetty. Due to their atmospheric
exposure, the two ship hulks are rusting at a rapid rate. A new, all-stone jetty is imminently
needed before the ships deteriorate to the point of no longer performing their breakwater
function. Also, the basin requires widening as soon as possible to enhance safety.
III. Project Description
The proposed project consists of the removal and relocation of a major portion of the
existing north-side rock jetty, and the removal of two-240 foot ships at the northeast tip of the
rock jetty (See Figure 4). The ships were sunk approximately 25 years ago to act as a jetty
extension from the existing rock jetty. Stone material from the existing rock jetty will be used to
build a portion of the relocated jetty, however new rock will be required on site for the remainder
of the new jetty.
Construction will occur in two separate phases:
Phase I consists of the excavation/dredging of an area that is located to the north of the
existing jetty (See Figure 5). This area will be dredged to a depth of approximately 6 feet, to
enable access by contractor barges.
Once the area is excavated, the contractor will begin construction of a new jetty using
stone from the existing jetty, as well as new material brought to site. Figures 7-10 depict
proposed cross-sections of the new jetty.
The two ships will also be removed from site. Ship materials will either be sold as scrap
metal, removed to an approved spoil site, or will be used to construct an artificial reef at an off-
site location. Coordination is ongoing with North Carolina Marine Fisheries to examine the
suitability of the ship hulks for an artificial reef.
Phase II begins upon completion of the new jetty and removal of the ships on site. Phase
II consists of excavation of material (sand and any remaining stone from the "old" jetty) from the
area where the "old" jetty was located (See Figure 6). Dredging will occur to a depth of
approximately 12 feet.
Phase II will also include an area of maintenance dredging, which is located along the
northwest face of the existing south-side jetty.
A volume of approximately 50,000 cubic yards of dredged material will be deposited in
designated upland spoil areas. It is anticipated that the spoil sites chosen will be located on the
Clayton Fulcher property, which lies immediately to the east of the ferry terminal. NCDOT
enjoys an ongoing easement with Mr. Fulcher for two areas of approximately 6 acres each. Each
site has sufficient capacity to store approximately 60,000 cubic yards of material, and is currently
permitted to accept dredge material. A copy of the permit is included in Appendix A.
IV. Environmental Commitments and Permits
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area.
NCDOT'S Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly
enforced during the construction stage of the project, to include Sedimentation Control for High
Quality Waters. Provisions to preclude unnecessary contamination by toxic substances during the
construction interval will also be observed.
The Ferry Division of the NCDOT will coordinate with the North Carolina Division of
Marine Fisheries to determine if the ships are suitable material to be used as an artificial reef at an
oil site location.
NCDOT does not anticipate any contractor activities on the adjacent beach owned by Mr.
Clayton Fulcher III. Offshore, however, the new jetty will be located in a riparian zone that is
currently shared by NCDOT and Mr. Fulcher. Therefore, any riparian rights issues will be
addressed during the permitting phase.
Any staging areas for contractor equipment or construction materials will be located on
high ground that is behind the hardened bulkhead on NCDOT property.
The Ferry Division of NCDOT is responsible for meeting the provisions of North Carolina
Administrative Code Title 15A Chapter 7H, "State Guidelines for Areas of Environmental
Concern," during the planning and construction of the proposed project. All dredging operations
will conform to applicable turbidity standards.
In accordance with the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), a CAMA permit will be
required from the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management.
Although the Ferry Division already conducts dredging activities on site under an existing
permit, an additional State Dredge and Fill Permit may be required from the N.C. Division of
Coastal Management. If required, this permit will likely be processed in conjunction with the
CAMA permit.
In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit will be required from the
US Army Corps of Engineers for the discharge of fill material into "Waters of the United States."
In accordance with Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, a permit will be required
from the US Army Corps of Engineers for construction activities in navigable waters / tidal
waters.
A Section 401 Water Quality Certification will be required from the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers withholds Section 404
Authorization until the Section 401 Certificate has been approved.
V. Alternative Analysis
The no-build alternative was considered. Given the confined maneuvering space of the
existing basin, however, unsafe conditions would continue. Considering the importance of this
ferry terminal to regional commerce and emergency evacuation plans, improving the Cedar Island
terminal will enhance capacity with minimal impact to the environment.
No alternative improvements were studied. The deteriorating ships cause the need for
improvements to the north-side jetty; however the ships cannot simply be replaced with a rock
jetty at their existing location because ferry operations would not be protected from wave actions
during the construction period. In addition, a wider basin is needed for maneuverability and
capacity of ferry vessels. A shift of the south-side jetty was not studied because it involves
impacting a beach area and an adjacent landowner, and would yield a basin shape which is less
conducive to vessel maneuverability.
VL Summary of Environmental Impacts
it is anticipated that the proposed project will result in minimal impact to the environment,
with most impacts occurring on a temporary basis.
Addition of stone material for the new jetty will add structure to an otherwise all-sand
bottom - thereby creating habitat for various species.
Oxygenation of basin waters is further enhanced as by the size and shape of the proposed
basin. The wider basin entrance will improve circulation from wave and tidal actions.
A volume of approximately 50,000 cubic yards of dredged material will be deposited in
designated spoil areas. It is currently anticipated that the spoil areas used will be the same sites
that are currently permitted for dredge spoil. These sites are adjacent to the ferry facility.
Commercial harvesting of shellfish does not occur in the project area, therefore no impact
to commerce is expected:
The terrestrial community found within the proposed project area may serve as nesting and
sheltering habitat for various wildlife. The proposed project will temporarily disturb habitat for
faunal species. This disturbance will force some species to find nesting and sheltering habitat at
other locations. Normally this type of habitat reduction concentrates wildlife into smaller areas of
refuge, thus causing some species to become more susceptible to disease, predation and starvation.
Due to the nature and scope of terrestrial disturbance related to this project, it is expected that
minimal impact will occur to terrestrial fauna.
4
No jurisdictional wetlands are located in the project area, therefore no impact will occur.
The project will have no effect on any federally-protected species, federal candidate species,
or state listed species.
Construction of the proposed project will?aet water resources by the following
processes: dredging of sediments within the project area, removal of the existing western betty and
the two sunken vessels, and construction of the new jetty. Project construction may result in the
following impacts to surface waters:
1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from project construction activities.
2. Temporary changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased turbidity.
3. Temporary increased nutrient loading via resuspension of sediments from dredging
operations and vessel removal.
4. Temporary increased concentration of toxic compounds from construction related activities
and toxic spills.
Estimated impacts to water resources are derived using the proposed construction limits of
the project, which corresponds to the footprint of the proposed Phase I and Phase II dredging
limits. Therefore, pjtconstruction will impact 2.9 ha (7.2 ac) of Pamlico: Sound,,
The following impacts to estuarine communities will occur as a result of project
construction:
1. Dredging and removal of the subtidal sandy substrate will remove any benthic organisms
present within this habitat. However, once the dredging operation is complete, it can
be expected that the area will be recolonized quickly by members of similar species.
2. Removal of the existing jetty will also remove any organisms that are attached to this
substrate. Construction of the new jetty will introduce a similar type of structure in
the project vicinity and it will be quickly recolonized by similar species.
3. Dredging the subtidal sandy substrate and removal of the existing jetty will temporarily
increase turbidity within the project area. Increased turbidity can cover desirable
substrates and clog the gills of marine fauna. Normally, turbidity associated with
dredging operations is minimal since high volume pumps immediately remove
disturbed sediments and suspended particles from the site. Normal operation of the
ferry terminal also results in low turbidity levels arising from prop wash of ferry
vessels. It is anticipated that turbidity resulting from project construction will not
exceed that of normal operation of the ferry terminal.
No, submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) is present in the project area, therefore no impact
will occur as a result of this undertaking.
VII. Regulatory Considerations
North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A Chapter 7H.0208, requires that "groins
shall be set back a minimum of 15 ft. from the adjoining property lines." However, the existing
north-side groin is already on the property line with Mr. Clayton Fulcher III. This section of the
groin that extends from the beach will remain at its existing location. However, any issues dealing
with riparian rights will be addressed during the permitting phase.
The project lies within a Public Trust Area, applicably defined as "all waters of the
Atlantic Ocean and the lands thereunder from the mean high water mark to the seaward limit of
state jurisdiction." As such, relocating the north-side jetty does claim a slightly larger area of
Public Trust waters. However, this project is proposed for a public purpose - to enhance the safe
operation of the N.C. Ferry Division. Therefore, the overall benefit to the public will be
enhanced.
Coordination was made with the United States Coast Guard to verify whether or not a
permit is required, in accordance with Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. According to the
Portsmouth, Virginia office, no permit is required.
VIII. Historic and Archaeological Resources
The entire project area has been highly disturbed by dredging and filling operations since
1965. There is no evidence of archaeological sites, and no structures exist that could be
considered to be historically significant. Offices of the State Historic Property Officer will have
an opportunity to further examine this finding during the permit review process.
IX. Natural Resources
The project study area lies within the Outer Coastal Plain Physiographic Province. The
topography of Cedar Island in the project vicinity is essentially flat with elevations ranging from 1.5
m to 3.0 m (5.0 to 10.0 ft) above mean sea level (msl). The higher elevations are associated with
dunes located on the beaches facing Pamlico Sound.
1. Methodology
Information sources used in the pre-field investigation of the study area include: U. S.
Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle map (North Bay), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
National Wetland Inventory Map (North Bay), Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS)
soil maps and a NCDOT aerial photograph of project area (1:1000). Water resource information
was obtained from publications of the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
(DEHNR, 1993) and from the NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (Environmental
Sensitivity Base Map of Carteret County, 1992). Information concerning the occurrence of federal
and state protected species in the study area was gathered from the Fish and Wildlife Service list of
protected and candidate species and the N.C. Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database of rare
species and unique habitats.
6
in the proposed vroiect area by NCDOT
bi?gists Brine O :Ellis and Dale Sutter on December 13; 199, ; ant communi ies and th
associated wildlife were identified and recorded. Wildlife identification involved using one or more
of the following observation techniques. active searching and capture, visual observations
(binoculars), identifying characteristic signs of wildlife (sounds, scat, tracks and burrows).
Jurisdictional wetland determinations were performed utilizing delineation criteria prescribed in the
"Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manu11;'.' (Enyironmentl Laboratory, 1987). •
2. Soils
One soil complex, Beaches-Newhan 0-30 percent slopes is present within the study area.
This complex consists of long narrow Beaches with Newhan soils on dune ridges. Beaches consist
of pale yellow sand, shells and shell fragments. Newhan soils have a light brownish gray fine sand
surface layer with an underlying layer of light gray fine sand. Beaches are flooded frequently by
wind driven tides, while Newhan soils are flooded by storm tides.
Beaches are used for recreation and as habitat by coastal birds and some marine animals.
Areas containing Newhan soils are valued as building sites because they overlook the ocean or
sound. However, they are limited for this use because of steep slopes, wind erosion, and septic
tank limitations. The Beaches-Newhan Complex has not been assigned to a woodland group.
Beaches-Newhan soils are listed on the County list of hydric soils however, they are not
included in the National list of hydric soils. The hydric classification of this soil complex is due to
the presence of Beaches soils. Soil core samples were taken throughout the project area and
revealed soils with a sandy texture. The soils did not exhibit hydric conditions, such as low chroma
colors, accumulation of organic matter or mottling. Hydric soils, as defined in the "Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual", 1987, were not observed withinxhe project study area.
3. Water Resources
This section contains information concerning those water resources likely to be impacted by
the project. Water resource information encompasses physical aspects of the resource, its
relationship to major water systems, Best Usage Standards and water quality of the resources.
Probable impacts to these water bodies are also discussed, as are means to minimize impacts.
a. Waters Impacted and Characteristics
The project lies within sub-basin no., Qr, -IBI)of the Neuse River Basin.,.. The
project study area is situated in the southeastern portion of Pamlico Sound. Pamlico Sound is a
body of water that separates mainland North Carolina from the outer barrier island coast. The
sound is an area where freshwaters from inland rivers mix with high salinity waters of the Atlantic
Ocean. Therefore, the salinity of the waters of Pamlico Sound will be intermediate between fresh
and ocean waters.
The project study area is located on the north shore of Cedar Island. Beaches and low lying
areas in vicinity of the project area are frequently flooded by wind driven tides. The substrate of
Pamlico Sound in the project vicinity is composed of fine sand.
b. Best Usage Classification
Water resources in North Carolina have been assigned a best usage classification by the
Division of Enviro MgVW Management (DEM). The Neuse River including the waters of Pamlico
Sound, index at the project location are classified as The "SA"
classification ' notEr"tt"hsalt waters that are "suitable for shellfishing for market purposes and any
7
other usage specified by the "SB" and "SC" classifications." The "SB" classification is defined as
"tidal salt waters suitable for primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC"
classification." The "SC" classification denotes "tidal salt waters that are suitable for aquatic life
propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, and secondary recreation." The supplemental
classification of "NSW" denotes nutrient sensitive waters that require limitations on nutrient
imports. " waters carry. an a„itional, suplemental;.c.(assfication of`"HQ":,ics
defined as "Nigh Quality ?V«aters :are w#ers tlit are r?.tei=;as?e llent based on bialcacalWai'
physipal/tlierrical characteristics through division monitoriug-or;special studies,.. and all Class SA
waters."
The Environmental Sensitivity Base Map of Carteret County indicates that the °=t£
ed l.,,andi;J1 44te designatiecl' as a Primary 'Nursery Arch. Cedar Island Bay is located
approximately 300 m (1000 ft) south of the project area. Ptojeet construction will have no impact
on Cedar Island Bay.
Water Supplies (WS-I: natural watersheds, or WS-II: predominantly undeveloped
watersheds) do not occur within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the project study area. High Quality Waters
(HQW) are present within the project vicinity. Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur 1.6 km
(1.0 mile) east of project study area.
c. Water Quality
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN) is managed by DEM and is part
of an ongoing ambient water quality monitoring program which addresses long term trends in water
quality. The program assesses water quality by sampling for selected benthic macroinvertebrate
organisms at fixed monitoring sites. Many species of macroinvertebrates are sensitive to very
subtle changes in water quality; thus, the particular species present, species richness and overall
biomass of these organisms are reflections of water quality. No BMAN data is available for waters
within the project vicinity.
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are permitted through the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Any discharger is required to
register for a permit. The NCDOT Cedar Island Ferry Terminal is a permitted discharger in the
project area. Rebekah Goodwin Seafood is a permitted discharger in the project vicinity. Both
dischargers are permitted for less than 0.5 million gallons per day.
d. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Waters
Construction of the proposed project will impact water resources by the following
processes: dredging of sediments within the project area, removal of the existing western jetty and
the two sunken vessels, and construction of the new jetty.
Project construction may result in the following impacts to surface waters:
1. Increased sedimentation and siltation from project construction activities.
2. Temporary changes in light incidence and water clarity due to increased turbidity.
3. Temporary increased nutrient loading via resuspension of sediments from dredging
operations and vessel removal.
4. Temporary increased concentration of toxic compounds from construction related activities
and toxic spills.
Estimated impacts to water resources are derived using the proposed construction limits of
the project, which corresponds to the footprint,of.the propose Phase an Phase 11 dredging,
limits. Therefore, project construction will impact 19 ha (7.1ac) of Pamlico Sounds
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the study area,
NCDOT'S Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be strictly
enforced during the construction stage of the project, as well as Sedimentation Control for High
Quality Waters. Provisions to preclude unnecessary contamination by toxic substances during the
construction interval will also be observed.
4. Biotic Resources
Scientific nomenclature and common names (when applicable) are provided for each animal
and plant species described. Subsequent references to the same organism will include the common
name only. Faunal species observed during the site visit are noted with an asterisk (*).
a. Terrestrial Communities
One terrestrial community is identified in the project study area: maintained/disturbed. This
community consists of the ferry terminal parking lot and the spoil basin. Community boundaries
associated with these areas are well defined without a significant transition zone between them and
neighboring natural communities. Faunal species likely to occur within the project vicinity will also
use this community for shelter, forage and movement corridors.
The ferry terminal parking lot is separated from adjacent natural communities by hardened
seawalls. The parking lot consists of impervious surfaces that include asphalt pavement, and ferry
terminal maintenance and rest area buildings. Contiguous to the west side of the parking lot is an
unpaved overflow lot with picnic facilities located on the outskirts. Vegetation associated with the
unpaved overflow lot consists of pennywort (Hvdrocotyle bonariensis), Bermuda grass (Cynodon
dactvlon) and buckhorn plantain
(Plantaeo lanceolata).
The existing spoil- basin is.logg d=,- east,side of the ferry terminal parking lot. The
spoil basin 'is situated on. private property, to which NCDOT has an easement for the operation of
the spoil basin. The basin has been used in recent years for various dredging projects associated
with the ferry terminal turning basin When the. spoil. has dewatered;- it is removed from the basin
and used, for-fill Consequently, this area is in a frequent state of disturbance. Vegetation observed
within the basinoundaries was sparse and included: pennywort, black needle rush
(Juncus roemerianus) and Bermuda grass.
Mammals associated with the maintained/disturbed community include: marsh rabbit*
(Svlvilagus a1Q ustris), marsh rice rat (Oryzomys alp ustri s), cotton mouse (Peromvscus gossypinus),
eastern mole (Scab us aquaticus) and raccoon (Procyon lotor). These mammals are most active at
night. The rodents will forage on grasses and other vegetation in this community. The raccoon will
normally feed on mussels and crustaceans in local marshes and mud flats, but will venture into this
disturbed community to scavenge on edible items in human refuse.
Reptiles that would inhabit the maintained/disturbed community include: Carolina anole
(Anolis carolinensis), fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) and six lined racerunner (Cnemidophorus
sexlineatus). These reptiles can be found thermoregulating in the exposed areas of the parking lot
and spoil basin. They forage on insects and spiders.
Avian species that will frequent the maintained/disturbed habitat include terrestrial species,
such as: catbird (Dumetella carolinensis), mockingbird Q&mus pol lyg ottos), brown thrasher
(Toxostoma rufumpainted bunting (Passerina ciris), boat tailed grackle (Quiscalus major) and
northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). These terrestrial avian species will forage on insects, fruits
and seeds that may be present within this community. Water birds that may rest or find foraging
opportunities in the maintained/disturbed community include: ring-billed gull* (Larus delawarensis),
herring gull (Larus ar eng_tatus), laughing gull (Larus atricilla) and common tern (Sterna hirundo).
The gulls are frequently seen following ferrys and other boats, where they wait for discarded food
items and forage organisms that are churned up by prop wash.
b. Estuarine Communities
The Pamlico Sound is the only water resource within the project study area. Four separate
estuarine communities are identified within the project area: lower beach, rock jetty (includes
sunken ship hulls), subtidal sandy substrate and subtidal (open water). No submersed aquatic
vegetation (SAV) is present within the project study area.
1. Lower Beach
The lower beach community is a transitional area between the terrestrial upper beach and
dune communities, and the littoral waters of Pamlico Sound. The lower beach is frequently flooded
by waves and wind driven tides. The substrate is consistently saturated, however it is rarely
completely covered by water for an extended period of time. Since this community is alternately
covered by water and exposed to air, only a few hardy species are able to find a niche in this
community. The mole crab (Emerita talpoida) burrows backward in the shifting sand each time a
wave advances upon the shore. It situates itself in the sandy substrate so that its antennae can filter
plankton from the outgoing wave. The coquina clam (Donax varibilis) burrows in the sand as a
wave recedes and is swept out of the substrate as a wave advances. The coquina clam also filters
plankton.
Fauna that find foraging opportunities within the lower beach community include: ghost
crab (Ocypode albicans), the aforementioned gulls, semipalmated plover
(Charadrius semipalmatus), Wilson's plover (C. wilsoni) a , sanderling Calidris alba) and the greater
black back gull* (Carus marinus). The sanderlmg runs to the edge or the water as an incoming
wave exposes small crustaceans. The gulls and the ghost crab will scavenge on any edible items
that wash up on shore.
2. Rock Jetty Community
In the otherwise featureless seascape of Pamlico Sound, the rock jetty provides an oasis of
solid substrate and structure. Many marine plants and animals need to attach themselves to solid
substrates at some point in their life cycle. The rock jetty also provides a structural diversity which
provides shelter and foraging opportunities for more mobile organisms. Competition for space on
this substrate is intense, and encrusting organisms will quickly cover these areas. Organisms that
can be found inhabiting the jetty can be divided into to two main groups: subtidal and intertidal.
Subtidal organisms are those plants and animals that are constantly covered by waters of the
Sound. Typical macroalgae attached to the jetty include: sea lettuce (Ulva lactuca), rockweed
(Fucus spp.), ectocarpus (Ectocarpus spp.), Coulter's seaweed ftoagardhiella spp.), pincher-weed
seaweed (Ceramium spp.) and sewing thread seaweed (Gracilana spp.). Animals that can be found
in this region of the jetty include: sea anemone (Aipgtasia alp lida), sun sponge (Hvmeniacidon sp.),
sea squirt (Styela spp.), winged oyster (Pteria colymbus), purple sea urchin (Ardacia punctulata)
and white sea urchin (L echinus variegatus). Fish associated with this habitat are sheephead
(Archosargus sp.), black sea bass (Centropristis striata), and cling-fish (Gobiesox sp.). The
sheephead has sharp teeth to scrape and eat barnacles from the jetty.
10
The intertidal community is a harsh environment where physical conditions change with the
tides. Organisms dwelling here have adapted to strong wave action, periodic exposure toextremes
of heat and cold, and desiccation. The filamentous algae, beautiful hair (Calothrix spp.) and
lyngbya (L 1gbya spp.) cover the rock substrate in the intertidal zone. Rocks covered by these
algae are slippery and can be hazardous. Estuarine fauna inhabiting this zone include: ribbed
mussel (Modiolus sp.), eastern oyster (Crassostrea vir?nica), rock barnacle (Balanus spp.), keyhole
limpet (Diodora caveninsis) and Atlantic chiton (Caet pleura aniculata). The Atlantic starfish
(Asterias forbesi) travels up and down the jetty with the tides as it forages molluscs. The sea
cockroach (Lyeida sp.) is an isopod that darts over the exposed substrate and scavenges on debris
and detritus left by the receding waves.
3. Subtidal Sandy Substrate
The subtidal sandy substrate community is constantly covered by the waters of Pamlico
Sound. Larger crustaceans found here include: horseshoe crab (Xiphosura polvnhemus), calico
crab (Ovalipes ocellatus), and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus). Molluscs that will inhabit the sandy
substrate are: welk (BgLycon spp.), eastern oyster, disk shell (Dosinia discus), and hard clam
(Mercenaria mercenaria). The oyster, disc shell and hard clam are bivalves that filter plankton,
while the welk is a gastropod that will forage on the bivalves. Blood worms (Glycera spp.), clam
worms (Nereis spp.) and the sea cucumber (Leptosmapta inhaerens) burrow into the substrate for
protection. The keyhole urchin (Mellita spp.) and heart urchin (Moira atropes) are other
invertebrates that can be found dwelling here. Vertebrates that are adapted to foraging in this
community include: smooth butterfly ray (Gumnura micrura), skate (R_aj_a spp) and several species
of flounder (Paralichthys spp.). These vertebrates are dosoventrally flattened which makes them
difficult to detect when they lie motionless on the sandy substrate.
commepcial mechanical harvesting of shellfish occurs in the project <vicinity.
4. Subtidal Open Water
The subtidal open water community contains free floating plankton, zooplankton, larval
stages of macro organisms, invertebrates and open water species of fish. Marine and estuarine
organisms that have pelagic larval stages include: the nauplius and cypris stages of barnacles, the
veliger stage of molluscs, erypterid stage of the horseshoe crab and the pluteus stage of starfish.
Many other marine organisms have a stage in their life cycle that is pelagic. Upon completion of
the free floating larval stage the organism settles onto a substrate (rocks, shells, sand, etc) to
continue its development into a macro organism.
One of the most important crustaceans of this community is the shrimp. Wolff 1976
reported that the pink shrimp (Penaeus durarum) is the most abundant shrimp in this region of
Pamlico Sound, while the brown shrimp (P. aztecus) is second in abundance. Adult shrimp forage
on small fish, molluscs and other crustaceans. They in turn are forage for many species of
gamefish. In other areas of Pamlico Sound, they are commercially harvested for human
consumption.
Open water species of fish that can be found in this region of Pamlico Sound include:
=Dl cephalus), white
pinfish (Lagodon rhomboides), spot (Lgiostomus xanthurus), striped mullet (M
mullet (M . curema) and Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia t, r n us). Wolff 1976, reported that the
mullets and Atlantic menhaden are the most abundant fish in this region. Species of gamefish that
occur in the Sound are: bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix): spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus),
red drum (Sciaenons ocellata) and Atlantic croaker M icropogon undulatus).
Avian species that forage on fish and crustaceans in this open water community include: the
gulls, black skimmer (Rmchons nigra), least tern (Sterna 9bifrons), common tern gull-billed tern
11
(Gelochelidon nilotica) and royal tern (Thg lasseus maximus). The terns dive into the water to
capture their prey, while the skimmer will fly low above the water and skim the surface with the
lower half of its beak to capture prey.
c. Summary of Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Resources
Construction of the subject project will have various impacts on the biotic resources
described. Any construction related activities in or near these resources have the potential to
impact biological functions. This section quantifies and qualifies impacts to the natural resources in
terms of area impacted and ecosystems affected. Temporary and permanent impacts are considered
here as well.
Table 1. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
Community Impacts
Maintained/Disturbed
Parking Lot 0.45(1.10)
Spoil Basin 2.42(6.00)
Lower Beach 0.01(0.03)
Rock Jetty 0.53(1.30)
Subtidal Sandy Substrate 2.91(7.20)
Subtidal Open Water Not Applicable
TOTAL IMPACTS 6.31(15.63)
Note: Values cited are in hectares (acres).
The terrestrial community found within the proposed project area may serve as nesting and
sheltering habitat for various wildlife. The proposed project will temporarily disturb habitat for
faunal species. This disturbance will force some species to find nesting and sheltering habitat at
other locations. Normally this type of habitat reduction concentrates wildlife into smaller areas of
refuge, thus causing some species to become more susceptible to disease, predation and starvation
Due to the nature and scope of terrestrial disturbance related to this project, it is expected that
minimal impact will occur to terrestrial fauna.
Estuarine communities are sensitive to even small changes in their environment. The
following impacts will occur as a result of project construction:
1. Dredging and removal of the subtidal sandy substrate will also remove any benthic organisms
present within this habitat. However, once the dredging operation is complete, it can
be expected that the area will be recolonized quickly by members of similar species.
2. Removal of the existing jetty will also remove any organisms that are attached to this
substrate. Construction of the new jetty will introduce a similar type of structure in
the project vicinity and it will be quickly recolonized by similar species.
3. Dredging the subtidal sandy substrate and removal of the existing jetty will temporarily
increase turbidity within the project area. Increased turbidity can cover desirable
substrates and clog the gills of marine fauna. Normally, turbidity associated with
dredging operations is minimal since high volume pumps immediately remove
disturbed sediments and suspended particles from the site. Normal operation of the
ferry terminal also results in low turbidity levels arising from prop wash of ferry
vessels. It is anticipated that turbidity resulting from project construction will not
exceed that of normal operation of the ferry terminal.
12
5 Jurisdictional Topics
This section provides descriptions, inventories and impact analysis pertinent to two
important issues--Waters of the United States and rare and protected species.
a. Waters of the United States
Surface waters and wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United States,"
as defined in Section 33 of the Code of Federal Register (CRF) Part 328.3. Wetlands, defined in 33
CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated conditions. Any action that proposes
to place fill into these areas falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE)
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
b. Characteristics of Wetlands and Surface Waters
Potential wetland communities were investigated pursuant to the 1987 "Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual." The three parameter approach is used where hydric soils,
hydrophytic vegetation and prescribed hydrologic characteristics must all be present for an area to
be considered a wetland. 'sdiational wetlands here observed within the project area,
however, jurisdictional surface waters are present.
c. Rare and Protected Species
Some populations of fauna and flora have been in, or are in, the process of decline either
due to natural forces or their inability to coexist with man. Federal law (under the provisions of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended) requires that any action, likely to adversely effect a.
species classified as federally-protected, be subject to review by the Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS). Other species may receive additional protection under separate state laws.
d. Federally-Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of March 28, 1995, the FWS
lists the following federally-protected species for Carteret County (Table 3). A brief description of
each species' characteristics and habitat follows.
13
Table 2. Federally-Protected Species for Carteret County
Scientific Name Common Name Status
Caretta caretta loggerhead sea turtle T
Charadrius melodus piping plover T
Chelonia mydas green sea turtle T
Deromochelys coriacea leatherback sea turtle E
Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon E
Felis concolor couszuar eastern cougar E
Haliaeetus leucocohalus bald eagle E
Lepidochelys kemni Kemp's Ridley sea turtle E
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker E
Sterna do_ougallii roseate tern E
Amaranthus pumilus seabeach amaranth T
Lvsimachia asperulaefolia rough-leaved loosestrife E
"E" denotes Endangered (a species that is threatened with extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range).
"T" denotes Threatened (a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range).
Caretta caretta (loggerhead sea turtle) T
Animal Family: Cheloniidae
Date Listed: 7/28/78
Distribution in N.C.: Beaufort, Bertie, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven,
Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank,
Pender, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION
NO EFFECT
Nesting beaches are not present within the project area. Project construction will be
confined to staging areas in the ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach and from barges in open
water. The loggerhead turtle may forage in the waters of Pamlico Sound, however project
construction will not reduce or interrupt foraging opportunities for the loggerhead turtle. The N.C.
Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed
no records of loggerhead turtles in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not
effect the loggerhead turtle.
Charadrius melodus (piping plover) T
Animal'Family: Charadriidae
Date Listed: 12/11/85
Distribution in N.C.: Brunswick, Carteret, Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Pender.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
No suitable habitat in the form of beaches with fine sand and mixtures of sand and pebbles is
present within the project area. Construction activities are limited to the ferry terminal parking lot,
lower beach and open water areas in proximity to the jetty. Project construction will not impact
foraging opportunities for the piping plover in vicinity of the project. The N.C. Natural Heritage
Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no records of the
piping plover in vicinity of the project. This species is only known from outer barrier beaches.
Therefore, project construction will not effect the piping plover.
14
Chelo a m s (green sea turtle) T
Animal Family: Cheloniidae
Date Listed: 7/28/78
Distribution in N.C.: Beaufort, Bertie, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven,
Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamilco, Pasquotank,
Pender, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Nesting beaches are not present within the project area. Project construction will be
confined to staging areas in the ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach and from barges in open
water. The green sea turtle may forage in the waters of Pamlico Sound, however project
construction will not reduce or interrupt foraging opportunities for the green sea turtle. The N.C.
Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed
no records of green sea turtles in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not effect
the green sea turtle.
Dermochelvs coriacea (leatherback sea turtle) E
Animal Family: Dermochelydae
Date Listed: 6/2/72
Distribution in N.C.: Brunswick, Carteret, Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow,
Pender.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Nesting beaches are not present within the project area. Project construction will be
confined to staging areas in the ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach and from barges in open
water. The leatherback turtle may forage in the waters of Pamlico Sound, however project
construction will not reduce or interrupt foraging opportunities for the loggerhead turtle. The N.C.
Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed
no records of leatherback turtles in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not
effect the leatherback turtle.
Falco peregrinus (Peregrine falcon) E
Animal Family: Falconidae
Date Listed: 3/20/84
Distribution in N.C.: Avery, Brunswick, Burke, Carteret, Dare, Hyde, Jackson, Madison, New
Hanover, Rutherford, Surry, Transylvania, Wilkes, Yancey.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Nesting habitat in the form of high cliffs, deciduous forests, bridges or skyscrapers
does not exist within the project vicinity. The peregrine falcon may find foraging
opportunities within the vicinity of the project, however project construction will not
interrupt or reduce foraging habitat. The N.C. Natural Heritage data base of rare species
and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no records of the peregrine falcon in vicinity
of the project. Therefore, project construction will not effect the peregrine falcon.
15
Felis concolor cou ar (eastern cougar) E
Animal Family: Felidae
Date Listed: 6/4/73
Distribution in N.C.: Brunswick, Buncombe, Carteret, Haywood, Montgomery, Onslow,
Swain, Yancey.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Habitat in the form of large remote wilderness does not exist within the project area. The
project area consists of the ferry terminal parking lot and the western jetty and associated waters of
the Pamlico Sound. The N.C. Natural Heritage data base of rare species and unique habitats was
reviewed and revealed no record of eastern cougars in the project vicinity. Therefore, project
construction will not effect the eastern cougar.
Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle) E
Animal Family: Accipitridae
Date Listed: 3/11/67
Distribution in N.C.: Anson, Beaufort, Brunswick, Carteret, Chatham, Chowan, Craven, Dare,
Durham, Guilford, Hyde, Montgomery, New Hanover, Northhampton,
Periquimans, Richmond, Stanley, Vance, Wake, Washington.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Nesting habitat in the form of large trees with a clear flight path to water does not exist
within the project vicinity. Foraging opportunities for the bald eagle are present within Pamlico
Sound, however project construction will not interrupt, interfere or reduce foraging opportunities
for the bald eagle. The N.C. Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique
habitats was reviewed and revealed no records of the bald eagle in the protect vicinity. Therefore,
project construction will not effect the bald eagle.
LMidochelys kemnii (Kemp's ridley's sea turtle) E
Animal Family: Cheloniidae
Date Listed: 12/2/70
Distribution in N.C.: Beaufort, Bertie, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chowan, Craven,
Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow, Pamilco, Pasquotank,
Pender, Perquimans, Tyrrell, Washington.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Nesting beaches are not present within the project area. Project construction will be
confined to staging areas in the ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach and from barges in open
water. The Kemp's ridley sea turtle may forage in the waters of Pamlico Sound, however protect
construction will not reduce or interrupt foraging opportunities for the turtle. The N.C. Natural
Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no
records of Kemp's ridley sea turtles in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not
effect the Kemp's ridley sea turtle.
16
Picoides borealis red-cockaded woodpecker) E
Animal Family: Picidae
Date Listed: 10/13/70
Distribution in N.C.: Anson, Beaufort, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Camden, Carteret, Chatham,
Columbus, Craven, Cumberland, Dare, Duplin, Forsyth, Gates, Halifax,
Harnett, Hertford, Hoke, Hyde, Johnston, Jones, Lee, Lenoir,
Montgomery, Moore, Nash, New Hanover, Northhampton, Onslow,
Orange, Pamlico, Pender, Perquimans, Pitt, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson,
Scotland, Tyrrell, Wake, Wayne, Wilson.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Habitat in the form of old growth pine stands does not exist for the RCW within the project
area or the project vicinity. The project study area consists of the ferry terminal parking lot, lower
beach, the jetty and associated waters of Pamlico Sound. The project vicinity is largely composed
of lower, upper beach and salt marsh communities. The N.C. Natural Heritage Program data base
of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no record of RCW in the project
vicinity. Therefore, construction of the proposed project will not effect the RCW.
Sterna doh dou allii (roseate tern) E
Animal Family: Laridae
Date Listed: 12/2/87
Distribution in N.C.: Carteret, Dare.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Suitable habitat in the form of isolated undisturbed islands with areas of preferred substrate
and vegetative cover does not exist within the project area. The project area consists of the ferry
terminal parking lot, lower beach, the jetty and associated waters of Pamlico Sound. Waters of the
Pamlico Sound in the project area do provide suitable foraging habitat, however project
construction will not interrupt, interfere or reduce foraging opportunities for the roseate tern. The
N.C. Natural Heritage Program of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no
records of the roseate tern in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not effect the
roseate tern.
Amaranthus up milus (sea-beach amaranth) T
Plant Family: Amaranthaceae
Federally Listed:
Flowers Present: June to frost
Distribution in N.C.: Brunswick, Carteret, Currituck, Dare, Hyde, New Hanover, Onslow,
Pender.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Suitable habitat in the form of barrier beaches functioning in.a relatively dynamic and
natural manner does not exist within the project study area. The project study area consists of the
ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach, jetty and associated waters of Pamlico Sound. The project
area was surveyed by NCDOT biologists Bruce Ellis and Dale Suiter and it was observed that
suitable habitat is not present within the project area for the sea beach amaranth. The N.C. Natural
Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no
listing of sea beach amaranth in the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will not effect
the sea beach amaranth.
17
Lysimachia asperulaefolia (rough-leaved loosestrife) E
Plant Family: Primulaceae
Federally Listed: June 12, 1987
Flowers Present: June
Distribution in N.C.: Beaufort, Bladen, Brunswick, Carteret, Columbus, Cumberland, Hoke,
Moore, Onslow, Pamlico, Pender, Richmond, Scotland.
BIOLOGICAL CONCLUSION NO EFFECT
Habitat in the form of ecotones between longleaf pine uplands, pond pine pocosins or
Carolina bays does not exist within the project study area. The project study area consists of the
ferry terminal parking lot, lower beach, the jetty and associated waters of Pamlico Sound. The
N.C. Natural Heritage data base of rare species and unique habitats was reviewed and revealed no
record of rough-leaved loosestrife within the project vicinity. Therefore, project construction will
not effect rough-leaved loosestrife.
e. Federal Candidate and State Listed Species
There are 16 federal candidate (C2) species listed for Carteret County. Federal candidate
species are not afforded federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to
any of ks provisions, including Section 7, until they are formally proposed or listed as Threatened
or Endangered. Candidate 2 (C2) species are defined as organisms which are vulnerable to
extinction although no sufficient data currently exist to warrant a listing of Endangered,
Threatened, Proposed Endangered or Proposed Threatened. Organisms which are listed as
Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or Special Concern (SC) by the North Carolina Heritage Program
list of Rare Plant and Animal species are afforded state protection under the State Endangered
Species Act and the North Carolina Plant Protection and Conservation Act of 1979.
Table 3 lists federal candidate species, the species state status (if afforded state protection)
and the existence of suitable habitat for each species in the study area. This species list is provided
for information purposes as the status of these species may be upgraded in the future.
A review of the N.C. Natural Heritage Program data base of rare species and unique habitats
revealed that the entire north shore of Cedar Island is listed as an "Identified Priority Area". Also,
areas east of the project area are listed as: "gull, tern and skimmer colony", an area of geological
significance and the presence of Clark's melampus (Detracia clarki). Clark's melampus is a marine
gastropod that is on the N.C. Natural Heritage Program Watch List (W3).
The above mentioned unique habitats and rare specie are not located within the project area and
therefore, project construction will have no effect upon these items.
Surveys for the federal candidate species were not conducted during the site visit, nor were
any of these species observed. A review of the N.C. Natural Heritage Program data base of rare
species and unique habitats revealed no other records of North Carolina rare and protected species,
or unique habitats in or near the project study area.
18
'T'able 3 -Federal Candidate Species: Carteret County
Scientific Name
Aimophila asestivals
Ammodramus henslowii
Laterallus jamaicensis
Malaclemvs terrapin
terra in
Rana areolata capito
Procambarus plumimanus
Spartiniphaaa carterae
Campylopus carolinae
Carex chapmanii
Dionaea muscipula
Litsea aestivalis
Mvri phyllum laxum
Oxypolis ternata
Solidaao up lchra
Tofieldia lg abra
Trichostema sp.
Common Name
Bachman's sparrow
Henslow's sparrow
Black rail
Northern diamondback
terrapin
Carolina crawfish frog
Croatan crayfish
Carter's noctuid moth
Savanna campylopus
Chapman's sedge
Venus flytrap
Pondspice
Loose watermilfoil
Savanna cowbane
Carolina goldenrod
Smooth bog-asphodel
Dune blue curls
NC
Status Habitat
SC NO
SR NO
SR NO
SC NO
SC NO
SR NO
SR NO
C NO
W1 NO
C-SC NO
C NO
T NO
Wl NO
E NO
C NO
C MARGINAL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"*" No specimen found in Carteret County in twenty years.
X. Agency Coordination
During the planning study, contact was maintained with state and federal agencies.
Written and telephonic coordination was made with the following agencies:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Wilmington, NC
U. S. Coast Guard - Portsmouth, VA
National Marine Fisheries Service
N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries
N.C. Division of Coastal Management
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
XL Basis for Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of planning and environmental studies, it has been determined that this project
will not have significant detrimental effects upon the quality of the human or natural environment.
The project has been reviewed by appropriate state and federal agencies, and no objections have
been raised. As a result, it is concluded that an Environmental Assessment / Finding of No
Significant Impact is applicable to this project. An Environmental Impact Statement will not be
prepared for this project.
19
Figures
i

N,

Rattan
Y-j
1 Portsmouth
?
.ay- Bay

Cedar
V sign c
- Sou ver _ eOa
'CEDAR
-4 CyOOJSUND 2
. .-.:Lola Su rsh 1n1e1
.?
Imon
_ t -
A% ^
F_Y
Itic
_- '-

ve
dow -Seale
s"1 "
I U - k.:Stacy -
1 DTam 1n(et
,/El(rs owe p Dav'' Jc0,kh
27.N
1
r
A
-,Betti
:
°
e
.
3 ry 0
Newport
t0
uhnsC 1 '
? f0 i)twa NF1lrston
c
7
_
o2
Gpr
I a FOR 1t 8 A. 2
rc
' Smyrna _j
eh
0. 8 a
?
e
a
'-Strplt;
..
C
yq
- Pei
4 _ -
? ?` -?)Marshallherg
'
•
Mans h7ed
GIOUGestlr OJT -
ieautOfi
o d "Pine Knoll-Shur - '? :
`
S
•
l ? B pe Ation 4 •SLP°n HarkenrEr q
?$
it
B
l F° r e

- d .1
«T
Poi
t s
e
each
° e Island I
egld IndianyPath T e_ R-1'
S
L ?y
.
Q
h N
Be

n
L
•.?Tapue lA(et

AI
am' ,
`?
ac
1
11
or°ral An° Ra
Isl!
Rap°n°I 8e°ch Amu fh Attlu ''?
We LOOKOUT LIGHTHOUSE

Y A i41 1
c .
0
U
N D
__? G
{
sr
41
0
CEDAR ISLAND
NATIONAL WROLIFE
REFUGE
C F
0 A
R

12 1.6 ?j
a
1388
?.
Pooff
0
IS

Alet
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
IMPROVEMENTS
TO CEDAR ISLAND FERRY FACILITY
CARTERET COUNTY
T.1. P. PROJECT NO. F - 2416
0 mile - 1
FIG. 1

6
s ?
?s 6 j 6
s ?
i _ _ asi .? w 6 a 6 i' X
t ;s i t `' f[ N
1
t * T rr •
? .s t ° ? .Y a W
? s 6 a 6 a /...?; ? °x J
• a
t
t g t
F ? t 6
F : •
s 40 s
N j ^!f
t ` f t NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
s 1; OF TRANSPORTATION
f j t DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
` PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
•" ?z BRANCH
j/? i f IMPROVEMENTS
a TO CEDAR ISLAND FERRY FACILITY
ti CARTERET COUNTY
T.1. P. PROJECT NO. F - 2416
2
0 feet 200 FIG. 3
0
S
O V
V `1 4-
l k)
Q ?? ' !
a C V ?07 ?y
o
j , It 1 ? 3 0
o?? F d GC
? ? Jv
O? O ?O? pD 10
a o
°Q ® o00
o ?
LL
C. 9 Q N

LL ,
°
a
zouw Z LL
ww0Z N
Ca mLLU
p
?t >ZW W L
E
a
d?OU 0Rm"
p
U 0: O
Q a
m
z Ua °
0?d
zQaoa o
w
U
O
00 x ?!
N O? W 11
p ° p Q 'o Q Is
V
J
O 0, C p - Q
O
o :' 0
I
• x .fs

Q
Q

0
4 "
to, V" ?

d J? c 1?
Ilk

J LL

A N} Z LL N

, q LULU0Z
.
E-
0 M U
0
? a
j
E
x ? Q

?
zoaa 0
w
. U
0
(+) V a
v
. 4ti?w r ia+
Q b
?t
c° W
00
?
? o o O N t!
vA
1 `?t oN\ fl w a i
o. a
F j? DIq ? ? ?
?f,? (??e pY e Q 0
ap <o
- Q'p 0 1 y ? V
0 fLJV^ -, ?
°
I Z 4
• V X o
n
• : q 1o h N`e ? o°
14
e
+x,
i
O ill p oCt ??oe Doi ,?

• aQ?
a
Q6 a

F co
LL
LL >.
r
io
c0
)
-
2 .?
0 ¢WD
o cc
?zm

??
?
a
Ua

?
x
zAw? o
W
U
O

f
o
F
W

?
U ti
C9
LL
w d u y N
q N I'm q
Ox0
q wWOZ
U
7.?
a E- z
D
dwd LL
F,
>zUl
E
ozz
x
m? aN?2
E
ZZU
pC?
d Qa
QUa niF
ow
_
z qax w F= oin
0 ii u
w
J
U
N
I 1 I 0
b Ln O I
S.
6
O
co
N ? .I
Q •1
d
o Q °
QO Z
C,I
?a C?Q ?L?
N w ?? ?? N
cil
p 1?- 1 f
N N r W I W ui ?O
"? o d 0 l?, \ C oc
? ? ?N ? ` O o 0
t
WV ---a Z Z'z
w
cs-
0
w
z:
z
J
H
h°-
• o co
W w LL
Lr5
? 0 a ?? a N
+
LL >
(? ?~ N>= ZLL
/ W
?OC?7Q wwOZ
U?
/ .4 E- 77..? 2LL
0 CC
>zw
/ U0OC7 mJ WO
r C) ?CL U) ?- M
xaa =>
a[ ? x ava oW
0
A z oom U
u u
. C) :-
J
Q
? y
x to
La / a
? Q
40 CD
0 \ 1
x•5:1 .? ° `? k can -
O O CZ5 a p
e W1 VN c?N?
x ?°- i g
0
_ Ln
4- IL CC
o a
' o
LLt N Z >
ti ?? LO
_ a ?+ w J

O ?
• O 0 ILO O
O) +
00
r
O
i I ` t0
d ' Q
L7cS
Q? . I M x N
U] p U a
A 3
zzw ??zLL
L
00

p ULU
gu,U f.
z
>ZWw
10; o0
uozz

~U
C m1
y-
a
FC
A? O
GQ
oUa Wr
Ow
z awe W c
n
U i
r
u

W
J
Q
V
N
01
CO
C3 CD
J
O
J
d0-
OY

'
c U/? 0 CC

?
. i 1 <Co Q.Ot ,
^

??" ?' w W a;
1 Lai ^

X
LI
x I' v ", -

i
t.
c
o
0
{ LL
LO In '/ ?a LL >N
+ i
! j. zozw w woz
U.
'. V UE?Gi. >Z W W
.j 04w8
M CL L4
0 L)
r
a
v N J ? I, 1
tnol
C? NA
I 1r a
?N
cn
? Idl ??4
4 ?. I ? t Q ` v1
,? t Lt11 1 f F IL
0
o ?. ?.: ! f
?9 CSC d j 1 W
O Qi 1
C/7 C\i
I ,
CC)
0 0 o o
Appendix A
Permit Class
4th Renewal
Main enance 10
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Natural Resoiiice3 and,Community Development
l?
r? •.? for 71 ---
MajorAvelop_friintin?hn e' Zvonmental
Conceifi pt}rsuinl td_Af 3 `
""fit I
I Al -?
Excavation'ana/or Fd7uig•0,rs`uahi to NCGS 113-229
Issued to_N•C. Dept. of Transportation, Ferry Div., Rrn 116, Maritime Bldg., 113 Arendel l Ave.
authorizing development in Carteret -County at Cedar Island Ferry Offraa ?'zy,iv?, 4=1
as requested in the permittee's application dated 6/6/85 including
attached plats, sheets 1-2 of 2, location map and proposed dredging dated rec 6/12/85
% •1 q E>
This permit, issued on . , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these temis may subject
permittee to a fine, imprisonment or civil action; or may cause the permit to be null and void.
(1) The disposal area effluent will be contained by pipe, trough or similar
device to a point at or below the MLW mark to prevent gully erosion and
resultant unnecessary siltation.
(2) The terminal end of the pipeline will be positioned at or greater than
50' from any part of the dike and a maximum distance from spillways to
allow adequate settlement of suspended solids.
(3) A water control structure will be installed at the intake end of the effluent
pipe so as to assure compliance with Condition No. 4.
(4) The activity will be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant
increase in turbidity outside of the area of construction or construction-rela-
.ted discharge.
This permit action may he appealed by the pemmittee
or other qualified persons within twenty (20) days of the
issuing date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work
initiation or continuance, as the case may be.
Ibis permit must be accessible on-site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification
not covered hereunder requires further Departmental
approval.
All work must cease when the permit expires on
June 30, 1996
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina
agrees that your project is consistent with the North
Carolina Coastal Management Program.
Signed by the authority of the Secretary of DNRCD and
the Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
1
I Ir, / I . 1
i
David W. Owens, Director
Division of Coastal Management
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Permit Number
9-73
of Permittee

APPLICATION
FOR
PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
Department of Administration state of North Carolina Department of the Army
(GS,46-12) Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
(GS 113-229,143-215.3(a)(1), 143.215.3(c), 113A-t13 (33 CFR 209.320-329)
Please type or print and fill in all blanks. If information is not applicable, so indicate by placing N/A in blank.
1. Applicant Information
A. Name a n of ans ortation-Fer Division
Last First Middle
B. Address-ROOM 116, Maritime Building, 113 Arendell Street
11.
4. Other length___width depth
C. I. Bulkhead length NA Average distance waterward of MHW (shoreline)
2. Type of bulkhead construction (material) NA
D. Excavated material (total for project)
1. Cubic yards 10, 000 cy 2. Type of material
E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (see also VI. A)
1. Cubic yards NA 2. Type of material
Street, P. O. Box or Route
Morehead City, NC 28557 [phone]
City or Town State Zip Code Phone
Location of Proposed Project:
A. County- Carteret
B. I. City. town, community or landmark Cedar Island Ferry Terminal
2. Is proposed work within city limits? Yes No I
C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or nearest named body of water to project Pamli co Sound
Description of Project
A. 1. Maintenance of existing project - X 2. New work
B. Purpose of excavation or fill
1. Access channel 130 t length 15._ 0_ width-10MSL depth
2. Boat basin length width -depth
3. Fill area length_width depth
IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment:
S. Does the disposal area include any marshland, swamps-or other wetland?
A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or other wetland? Yes - No ..I
C. Disposal Area
1. Location- On high jzround
2. Do you claim tale to d(spo:W Area?_
D. Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in
adjacent to basin
Yes No I
E. How will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled? Dikes
F. Typc of equipment to be used Hydraulic dredge
G. Will marshland be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? If yes, explain No
D& F-81
Rev. 10/7g
V. • Intended Use of Project Area (Describe)
A. 1. Private
2. Commercial
3. Housing Development or Industrial
4. Other State owned ferrv
B. 1. Lot size(s) NA
tX.
X.
2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water-NA
3. Soil type and texture NA
4. Type of building facilities or structures CIA
S. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing NA Planned
B. Describe
6. (Land Classification'(circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITY RURAL
CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis)
VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality:
A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of.fill materials below mean high water? Yes No. X
B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the
area following project completion? Yes X No
2. Typeofdischirge Water from dredaPd sand-slur=
3. Location of discharge See sketch
VII. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): Unknown
Vill. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State
work In project area, a "t.T^e% ^^ •' - - - - - - permits for
applicable:
Length of time required to complete project: 30 days
In addition to the completed applicati m form, the following items must be provided:
A. Attach a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant
claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property,
then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written
permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land.
B. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8% X 11" white paper (see instruction booklet for
details). Npte: Origin drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted.
C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or
certified mail or by publication (G.S.113-229 (d))Enter date served
D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's.
Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below.
Clayton Fulcher, Jr. - Atlantic
- -XI. -Certification requirement: 1 certify that to the best of my knowledge. the proposed activity complies
with the State of North Carolina's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a r
manner consistent with such program.
XII. Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli-
cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel-
opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, aro land c ar g. ?-1
DATE 06/ 06185-
Applicant's Signature
D& F-82
Rev. 10/78 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS

P A H L I C O S O U N t! w
y PROTECT SL=
? .o.o
pow
Ilk.
': NwflO.Ml wltDUrr'-q µ, •.66', t Coma swe
if'x E r i
c.
O
?? A t ` w . ., Y
6 co lb ci
/jt
Pope
o
pa-W
" G
_ v O
r
POP. 9"
/_?\ Sao A
sCALM
VICINITY MAP N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TIUNSPORTATION
?XM NORTH CAROLINA D.O.T. M7ISION OF HIC IWAYS
CAR=T COUNTY
CAR=T COUNTY MAP
PROPOSED MAINMIMICE
DREDGING AT.THE
CEDAR ISLAIW FERFX
TERMINAL
SEPTc.Iu. R, 1978 STMT / OF _12 SID E TS

.
I
. ,
a?

- ?-' I

I tl ?..
H r D O * s
iN -
o A ? 2;
?o =
. ?1 ? 2 1 O
o "
^
log
V• ? o
0
o c
p

•
' O
O
0
Z
O
O
O
A
i
I
1
,
• 1

FEB-29-1996 10:03 FROM EHNR W I LM REG OFFICE TO B-919-733-9959 P.01
State of North Calrolma
i)epartment of Faavaw==, Health, and Natural Resources I
Wilmington Regionai Office
James B. Hunt, Governor _
Dona D. Howes, seeretary
FAX COVER
DATE: c?• a2P- 57 „
.J. j
TO:
CO:
NO. OF PAGES
FFIOM:
CO:
FAX #: ' at 9 .
REMARKS:
FAX #:
127 Cardinal Drive Lxuwkm, R?ilmicg0a, N.C. 28405-3845 * Telephone (910) $95,3400 + Paz [phone]
An Equal 0000 tunny AfBm'a m&o Aotioa EmPlom

FEB-29-19% 1004 FROM EHNR W I LM REG OFFICE TO 8-919-733-9959 P.02
DIMION OF ENVIRONAOIN 'SAL MANAGE ENT
r
Do*-- February 29, V%
To: John Dorsey
From: James H. Gregson JW,,,
W' ' ,glen Rqt ad Office
7brough: Dave Adidns4' 141, '
WIW2bWWA Regional Office
Subject: NC DOT Cedar Island berry Terminal
DEW Project #960081
Carwrot Counly

We gabmitted commmu on the CAMA Pem dt appbmdon for the subject project ova
February X3,1996. Charles Jows ink oooued me several days ago that SheWAsh Sa tion would
be recowwwdimg addNwal closure of the waters ammid the proposed bads epansion. He
indicated, and I concurred, that the prajed would need a Use Attainabffity Analysis. It is my
understanding that the existing closed area will increase by approximately 5 acres.
Please find the attached Use Attainability Analysis for your review.
JHG:960081.UAA
Cc: Wilmington Regional Office Flies
central Files
Charles Jones
FEB-29-1996 1004 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO 8-919-733-9969 P.03
•
Tb: John Dorney.
Pla=ing Branch
DXV'1910N OF =VS?tOI?iTAL =1=12u m
Use Attainability Analyaia for
Proposed Marina Projects in Class 519 Paters
(Check all Appropriate Boxes or fill in Slacks)
Project Name: NC DOT Cedar Island Ferry Terudnal
DEN Project #960081
Section 1. Project Description
A. _._Pew Marina _Marina Bxpansi.on
S. .NQW Sarin (dug out of high ground)
(Include specifications and sketch.)
X Existing Basin Expansion
(Include specifications and sketch.)
JLNatural Waters
Others (Please describe below.)
C. Proposed No. Blips A
Existting No. Slips ,--.I
D. .Comercial Marina
rivate Marina
Publicly Owned Marina
LOther (Please describe below'.)
E. Description of Any Uniq'ae Characteristics' or Operational
Proposals.
FEB-29-1996 1004 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO B-919-733-9969 P.04
Section II. Baisting Qea Determination (for waters outside
marina basins)
A. Closure Status (check one)
Open Waters
.Closed Paters (by data) Date Closed
B. Will the proposed project result in any additional
closed acreage? (please attach analysis showing
calculations for area of closure.)
JLYes -_No _„`Not Clear
C. Does the area to be effected by any closure have any
significant shellfish resources?,
_„_Yes N NO "Unknown
Briefly provide description of resource and any other
characteristics.
See Attached -Memo from David maylQr__
D. Has the area to be impacted by the proposed project been
available for shellfish harvesting and has shellfish
harvesting occurred since November 28, 1975?
es _1...No „Unknown
B. Is the entire area to be impacted by the proposed
project currently unavailable for shellfiabing because
of the DES Drina Rule or other irretrievable man
induced impact?
es N.No
If yes, briefly describe below.
FEB-29-1996 1005 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO 8-919-733-9959 P.05
M '
section III. Attainebia Use Dete3nain*tion (To be CoMleted
Only if the "SWer to TI.A is Closed Waters (y
Dgtikl, and if the answers to'1I.C and II.D are-
NO).
A. What are the major sources of pollution causing the
closure?
B. What actions are required to reduce or eliminate these
existing sources of pollution?
can the areas be expected to be open for shellfishing
given reasonable efforts to control the existing sources
of pollution? Explain.
section I9. Project Decision
A. Recomonend Project Denial
.There has been a recent shelifishing use (Answer to
II.D is Yaa) and the area is not currently
irretrievably closed (answer to 11.E is NN).
OR
Shellfishing is a reasonably attainable use according
to Section III.
OR
.Insufficient information (Answers to II.C and/or 11.D
are fin)
B. Recommend Project Approval
JLThere has not been a recent shelifishing use (Answer
to II.D is No) and shellfishing is not a reasonably
attainable use according to Section III%
on
.,The entire area is irretrievably lost to shellfishing
as a result of the DNS Rule or other irreversible
man-induced impact (Answer to ME is Xsa)
FEB-29-19% 1005 FROM EHNR WILM REG OFFICE TO 8-919-733-9969 P.06
C. Conditions to be Included in, the permit (check
appropriately}
Pump-out Facilities Only Boats W/o Heads
_Locked-Head Policy
`NO Transient Docking
„moo Live-Aboards
D. What additional information is required to make an
informed permit decision?
Thin analysis and reaommeemdstion ban been preparAe by 'Me
Wi3mingtOn Regional Of i c
ate
This evaluation of attar n- ility of shellfish uses in the
staters in the vicinity of kamli2o o n
is approved by:
Water Quality section Date
Director's Office ate
A. Preston HOward, Jr. , P . S .
Director
FEB-29-1996 10:05 FROM EHNR W I LM REG OFFICE TO B-919-733-9959 P.07
DEPARTMENT OF EMMONMMENT, HEALTH & NATURAL RMOLTAM
D ON OF COASTAL biMAG T

A=o
MORE BEAD C= OFFICE.
U41 ARMwELL SnzET, MApjM FrS S BUJIMING
E. O. Box 769
1'40REEIPAD C= NC 28597
TO:
OFFICE: `-r
TH[.HPHONE #: L,_ _ FAX r 1
FROM:
OFFICL
MLEP HONE #: ZM 72 7 FAX #: [919124?-333
DAVE:
??assess??ps saorTSM7esleflee=wess?lssas?ds?ssaam==MOM=MMft MW ftmw
RP--
TOTAL NtMBER OF FAGrFS Il\TCLt ?dG ERAS ;
FEB-29-1996 1006 FROM EHNR W I LM REG OFFICE
StmtG Of !North Carvllna
' DOP4 tment of Environment,
N081th and Natural Resources
D'ndaion of Marine Fisheries
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Joaatherl 6. Howes. Secrrotary
Erme L. Freeman, Directer
PtSROWDUR
TO:
FROM!
DATE:
SWEAT:
Jim crogson
David L. Taylor
February 27, 1995
ce"T Island Fsrry TO=-"* ZI41 Expansion
klirz
PA
EF--IN
R
This Is-'In reWd to the Use Attainability Analysis for the proposed
widsnin$ Of the access channel to the Cedar Island Ferry Terminal. The
present additional. pox a y area setoa, b& grailsafgectad by the expansion has no shellfish resources
.
The area h" been available for shellfish harvest: since 1975, but due to
the shallow nature of the bottom and the shifting sand substrate, no hirvest has
occurred because or the lack of CIMas, oysters, scallops or rivssels there.
1 hope thfs information'hales yoL iu Your ssseseient. If you have further
questtans, please call me at 1-$00_662.2632..
P.O, kX 769. Morehead City, North Csr06na 2$557-9769 Telephone [phone] PAX 919-726.0254
Aa fta' OQpOltunity Aftinlladve Aeon Emtllowr 5098 recvciedt lo% nneNnnnsrtmn, nM?br
TYTTAf h nn
TOTAL P.08
TO 8-919-733-9959 P.08

?rz
v
z?117
62
IMPORTANT
To
Date Time
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M
of
Phone
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION

Message

Signed
TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources