WQ0000430_Application_20200115

0101 0
EEO
Application For Renewal of
Permit NO. WQ0000430
Land Application of Town of Cherryville, NC
Residuals
Prepared by:
Alex Fox
Synagro Central, LLC
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC 27028
P 336-998-7150 F 336-998-8450
December 10, 2019

December 31, 2019
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Aquifer Protection Section — Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
ATTENTION: Mr. Nathaniel Thornburg
REFERENCE: APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF PERMIT #
WQ0000430
City of Cherryville
Dear Mr. Thornburg:
On behalf of the City of Cherryville, Synagro is submitting the additional
information requested by your office.
The LASC, RSC and the spill control have been updated. Attached is the records for
the 30 Day Bench as well. The soil work has been fixed to include Hg in the
Baseline test.
This application package should contain all of the information necessary to complete
the requested renewal of the City of Cherryville's permit. However, if you require
additional information or have further questions, please contact me at 336-703-8681
or [e-mail] Thank you in advance for the timely and efficient review of
this renewal application.
Sincerely,
Alex Fox

o�0F w a rF,�QG
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Division of Water Quality
ft
'C RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 08-11
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit the Land Application Unit (LAU) web site at:
http: //portal. ncdenr. orgAveb/wg/aps/lau
General — This application is for treatment, storage, transport, and/or land application of Class B residuals (may include residuals that
are generated from a water treatment plant or other type facilities) on the proposed or currently approved land application site(s) under
15A NCAC 02T. 1100.
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 08-11) Application: (All Application Packages):
Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Land Application Program (FORM: RLAP 08-11) form. Please
do not make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments
to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they
refer.
The Applicant's Certification on Page 5 of this form shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). An
alternate person may be designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the
criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b).
® If this project is for a modification of an existing permit, submit one copy of the existing permit.
® Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit, or 90 days prior to
operation of proposed facility(ies) for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee (New and Major Modification Application Packages)
Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR).
STANDARD REVIEW — Submit the appropriate fee for all new and major modification applications as listed in the table
below.
EXPRESS REVIEW — Visit the Express Review webpage for the Express Fee Schedule:
STANDARD APPLICATION REVIEW FEES:
Facility Classification I New Permit I Major Modification 1
Major (land are permitted for > 300 acres) 1 $1,310 1 $395
Minor (land are permitted for < 300 acres) 1 $810 1 $245
' - A major modification shall be defined as any permit modification that: increases the generating facility's residuals dry tonnage;
adds additional land application areas not previously approved; adds additional residuals sources; or includes the addition of new
treatment or storage units/processes not previously permitted. There is no fee for minor permit modifications.
C. Cover Letter (All Application Packages)
List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action.
D. Environmental Assessments (May be Required — See 15A NCAC 1 C .0300)
Submit a copy of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also, include
information on any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment (EA) that impact the construction of the residuals
treatment and storage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or lands are used for
the construction of the subject facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 1 of 3

E. Operation and Maintenance Plan (New and Renewal Application Packages)
For Modification Application, if there are any changes to the existing plan, submit an updated O&M plan.
Submit the O&M Plan in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T . 1110 and include at a minimum:
Operational functions; describe the operation of the program to show what operations are necessary for the program to
function and by whom the functions are to be conducted.
® Maintenance schedules; may include equipments calibration, maintenance of signs, etc.
® Safety measures; may include safety training program, manuals, signs, etc.
® Spill response plan; including control, containment, remediation, emergency contact information, etc.
® Inspection plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections.
Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and procedures to assure that the
selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative of the residuals management program.
Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken by the inspector in the
event that noncompliance is observed.
® Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information;
® Names and titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring.
® Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored.
® Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected. Fluctuation in temperature,
flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the residuals gathered during a particular sampling event.
The sampling plan shall account for any foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for
residuals to meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that land apply multiple times per
year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during winter months when pathogen reduction is most
likely to be negatively affected by cold temperatures.
THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ITEMS (G to M) ARE REQUIRED FOR DEDICATED PROGRAM ONLY.
F. Program Determination
Dedicated residuals land application programs are ones in which land application sites meet the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T
.110202). Specifically, a residuals land application program is designated as dedicated if any of the following are applicable:
Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals at rates or frequencies
greater than agronomic rates.
❑ Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that is used primarily for residuals disposal,
and agricultural crop production is of secondary importance.
Any land application site certified for the residuals land application program that receives residuals through fixed
irrigation facilities or irrigation facilities fed through a feed supply system.
❑ Please contact the Aquifer Protection Section if you need any assistance in determining whether your residuals program falls
under the dedicated program definitions.
G. Program Information
❑ Provide an explanation of why a dedicated system is required instead of a conventional non -dedicated system.
❑ Provide an explanation of the dedicated system and its operation.
H. Detailed Site Maps (All New or Modification Application Packages)
Submit three (3) sets of standard size plans and two (2) sets of I I" by 17" plans (electronic format is acceptable - Adobe PDF
only). For Modifications, submit plans specific to the modification(s) only.
Plans must include the following minimum items:
A general location map, a vicinity map and a topographic map with contours not exceeding 10 feet or 25% of the total site
relief and showing all facility related structures and fences within the land application area.
The location of all wells (including usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and
perennial), springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of the land application site(s).
Delineation of the review and compliance boundaries
Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .1108
Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all waste treatment, storage, and disposal site(s).
A map showing the entire irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation area depicted by the soil scientist's
evaluation. The irrigation plans shall show each nozzle/emitter and wetted area (when applicable). Clearly label spray
irrigation zones as they will be operated.
Plans must depict a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate that they are anything other than final plans. However, the plans may be labeled
with the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 2 of 3

L Project Evaluation and Receiver Site Management Plan (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new
sites)
Submit a project evaluation and a receiver site management plan (if applicable) with recommendations concerning cover
crops and their ability to accept the proposed application rates.
J. Hydrogeologic Report (All New Application Packages or Modifications involving increasing the total design capacity)
Submit a detailed hydrogeologic evaluation in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(4) and current Division Policy
available at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ans/lau/policies. The document shall be signed, sealed and dated by a qualified
professional.
K. Engineering Design Documents (All New or Modification Application Packages with fixed irrigation facilities or irrigation
facilities fed through fixed supply system)
Submit engineering design documents that have been signed, sealed, and dated by a NC licensed Professional Engineer and/or
Professional Land Surveyor in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T . 1104(d)(2). For Modifications, submit an updated site map
specific to the modification(s) only.
❑ The design documents must include the following minimum items:
Engineering plans for the facility and equipment except those previously permitted unless they are directly tied into the
new units or are critical to the understanding of the complete process;
Specifications describing materials to be used, method of construction, and means for ensuring quality and integrity of the
finished product including leaking testing; and
Engineering calculations including hydraulic and pollutant loading, sizing criteria, hydraulic profile, total dynamic head
curve analysis for each pump, and irrigation design.
Soil mapping units shown on all disposal sites.
L. Water Balance (All New Application Packages or Modifications that include new sites utilizing feed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed through fixed supply systems)
Submit a completed and accurate water balance in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1104(d)(5) and current Division Policy
available at: http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/wq/ans/lau/policies.
M. Property Ownership Documentation (All New or Modification Application Packages involving new and/or relocated treatment
or irrigation components)
Property ownership documentation shall consist of one of the following:
Legal documentation of ownership (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporation), or
Written notarized intent to purchase agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or
An easement running with the land specifically indicating the intended use of the property and meeting the requirements of
15A NCAC 02L .0107(fl, or
A written notarized lease agreement signed by both parties, indicating the intended use of the property, as well as a plat or
survey map.
ONE ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS, SHALL BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
LAND APPLICATION UNIT
By U.S. Postal Service:
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
By Courier/Special Delivery:
2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 3 of 3

o�0F w a rF,�QG
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j Division of Water Quality
ft
'C RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
FORM: RLAP 08-11
L APPLICANT INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name: City of Cherryville
Applicant type: Tn Individual 0 Corporation General Partnership 0 Privately -Owned Public Utility
n Federal 0 State Municipal 0 County
Signature authority's name per 15A NCAC 02T .0106: Larry Wright Title: Plant Supervisor/ORC
Applicant's mailing address: 116 South Mountain Street
City: Cherryville State: NC Zip: 28021
Telephone number: (704)-214-1162 Email Address: [e-mail]
2. Consultant's name: Alex Fox License Number (for P.E.): _
Affiliation: 0 On Staff Retained (Firm: Svnagro Central, LLC)
Consultant's mailing address: 284 Boger Rd
City: Mocksville State: N.C. Zip: 27028
Telephone number: (336)-703-8681 Email Address: afox&synagro.com
Agronomist's name: License Number: _
Affiliation: 0 On Staff 0 Retained (Firm: Svnagro Central, LLC)
Agronomist's mailing address:
City: State:
Telephone number:
3. Soil Scientist's name:
Zip:
Email Address:
License Number:
Affiliation: 0 On Staff 0 Retained (Firm: Svnagro Central, LLC)
Soil Scientist's mailing address: .
City: State: Zip:
Telephone number: Email
IL PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application is for (check all that apply): JU new, 0 modified, 0 renewed permit
2. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit, provide the following:
Permit number: W00000430
Date of most -recently issued permit: 04/24/2015
Date of most -recently certified Attachment A (if different than the permit):
Date of most -recently certified Attachment B (if different than the permit):
FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 1 of 5

III. RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM INFORMATION:
1. Residuals Processing Facility's physical address: 736 Tot Dellinger Road
City: Cherryville State: NC Zip: 28021
Coordinates: Latitude: 35' 24'51" Longitude: 81' 22' 08"
Datum: NAD83 Level of accuracy: second
Method of measurement: MAP
2. County where residuals land application program is headquartered: Gaston
3. List the Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC) and all Back -Up ORCs for the residuals land application program, their
certification numbers, and their affiliations in the following table:
Designation
Name
Affiliation
Certification
Number
ORC
Robert Michael Cox
Synagro Central, LLC
LA13191
Back -Up ORC
Robert Roth
Synagro Central, LLC
LA1001672
Additional Back -Up ORCs
(if applicable)
If an ORC and at least one Back -Up ORC are not currently designated for this residuals land application program, provide the
candidates' names, affiliations, and an estimated time schedule for each candidate's completion of the required training school
and certification test: Alex Fox Snagxo Central LLC. Scheduled to take class and exam 04/02/2020
Complete the following tables regarding management of the residuals land application program:
a. Plant Available Nitrogen Summary: Determine the maximum plant available nitrogen (PAN) generated by all residuals
source -generating facilities as currently certified and proposed for certification with this application and list the results in
the following table:
Maximum amount of residuals to be certified: 273 dry tons per year.
PAN
Pounds of PAN per Dry Ton
(Weighted Average)
Pounds of PAN per Year
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
Surface
Incorporation
or Injection
First -Year
21.16
25.38
577
6928
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted
31.92
36.14
8714
9866
b. Land Application Site Use Summary: Summarize information regarding the land application sites as currently certified
and proposed for certification with this application:
Category
Use
Acres
Comments
Crops
Forest or Plantation
0.0
_
Row Crops
93.8
_
Hay
0.0
Pasture
22.7
Total:
116.5
Methods
Surface
116.5
Incorporation or Injection
0.0
_
Total:
116.5
_
FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 2 of 5

c. Residuals Land Application Summary: Determine the minimum acreage required to land apply the residuals as currently
certified and proposed for certification assuming the scenarios listed in the following table:
Assumed
Application Rate
(lbs PAN/ac yr)
Acres Required Using
First -Year PAN Concentrations
Acres Required Using
Five -Year Maximum Adjusted PAN
Concentrations
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
Surface
Incorporation or
Injection
50
115.5
138.6
174.3
197.3
100
57.8
69.3
87.1
98.7
150
38.5
46.2
58.1
65.8
200
28.9
34.6
43.6
49.3
6. If applicable, provide a plan and a schedule to resolve any known issues that would prevent land application of the proposed
residuals due to the violation of North Carolina Administrative Code (e.g. not enough storage, not enough land, vector
reduction practices not in place, etc.):.56
7. Specify type of residuals program (See Instruction F): 0 Non -dedicated 0 Dedicated
If Dedicated, specify the following (check all that apply):
IR Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals at rates or frequencies greater than
agronomic rates, explain; =
❑ Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that is used primarily for residuals disposal, and agricultural crop
production is of secondary importance, explain; _
Residuals program contains any land application site(s) that receives residuals through fixed irrigation facilities or
irrigation facilities fed through a fixed supply system, explain; _
IV. RESIDUALS SOURCE INFORMATION: (Not required if no new, renewed, or modified residuals source)
Complete and submit the following Residuals Source Certification and all associated documentation.
R
Residuals Source
Certification
V. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION: (Not required if no new, renewed, or modified land application site)
Complete and submit the following Land Applications Site Certification and all associated documentation.
IN
Land Application Site
Certification.doc
FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 3 of 5

Note: Item VI. Applicable to Dedicated Program with fixed irrigation system only.
VI. DESIGN INFORMATION FOR FIXED IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1. The irrigation system is: 0 Spray 0 Drip
2. Disposal system is: 0 existing proposed.
3. Minimum depth to mean seasonal high water table (SHWT) within irrigation sites(s) per Soil Scientist's Evaluation:
feet below ground surface. Rules 15A NCAC 02T .0505(o requires at least one -foot vertical separation between SHWT and
ground surface.
4. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures within 200 feet of any irrigation area?
❑ Yes or JU No If Yes, please explain if the soil scientist report addresses artificial structures and please indicate if
structures are to be maintained or modified: _
5. Loading rates recommended by the Soil Scientist Evaluation:
Soil Series
Fields within Soil Area
Recommended
Loading Rate
in/hr
Recommended
Loading Rate
in/ r
6. Design loading rates are equal or less than the loading rates recommended by Soil Scientist?
JR Yes or JR No If No, explain why 15A NCAC 02T .0505(n) is not met:
7. Non -dedicated System Design (fill in the appropriate information for either a spray or drip irrigation system):
Field / Zone
Design Area
(ft-)
Number of
Nozzles
Maximum Application
Rate ( allons/hr)
Design Annual Loading
Rate ( allons/yr)
Total
Spray Irrigation Design Element
Plan Sheet
Number
Specification
Page Number
Wetted diameter of nozzles
ft
Wetted area of nozzles
_ ftz
Nozzle capacity
_ gpm
Nozzle manufacturer / model
Elevation of highest nozzle
_ ft
FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 4 of 5

Applicant's Certification (signing authority must be in compliance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106):
The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility without
proper closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any
active compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 15A NCAC 02T .0105.
Yes 0 No, Explain;_
I, Larry Wright Plant Supervisor/ORC
(Signature Authority's Name — PLEASE PRINT) (Title)
attest that this application for City of Cherryvilli
(Facility Name)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the Division of Water Quality
may not conduct a technical review of this program and approval does not constitute a variance to any rules or statutes unless
specifically granted in the permit. Further, any discharge of residuals to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate
enforcement action, which may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the
Division of Water Quality should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application
are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be
returned to me as incomplete.
Note: In accordance with North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.6A and §143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any
false statement, representation, or certification in any application shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine
not to exceed $10,000 as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation.
Signature:
Date:
FORM: RLAP 08-11 Page 5 of 5

o�0F w a rF,�QG
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
ft
'C RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 08-11
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit the Land Application Unit (LAU) web site at:
http: //portal. ncdenr. org/webhvq/aps/lau
General — This certification provides detailed information of residuals source generating facility and its residuals quality for land
application, distribution, or disposal in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review without
a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 08-11, FORM: DCAR 08-11, or FORM: SDR 08-11).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 08-11):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: RSC 08-11) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit a separate certification for each source facility.
❑ For modified permits, submit a separate certification for only those facilities that are affected by the proposed modification.
® Complete the residuals source facility summary page. List all new, renewed, or modified facilities.
B. Residuals Source -Generating Facility Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Vicinity map - A vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the "Map Guidance for
Residuals Land Application Permits".
® Process flow diagram and/or narrative - A detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals
are to be generated, treated, processed, and stored at the facility.
® Quantitative justification for residuals production rate - A quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8.
Ensure that the amount of residuals listed is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of
the permit. In addition, ensure that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed,
and/or disposed, including any chemicals, amendments, or other additives that are added to the residuals during
processing.
® Sampling plan - A detailed sampling plan for the residuals source -generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division -certified laboratory to be used. In addition,
ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable pathogen reduction and
vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must be completed on the residuals as
they are to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
® For each source facility, attach the following:
® Laboratory analytical reports and operational data - reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this certification.
® Documentation that the facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector
attraction reduction requirements.
❑ For new facility that may have not yet been constructed and analytical results of residuals cannot be obtained, please
attach analytical results of residuals generated from a similar facility along with the description of similarities of the two
facilities.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 1 of 1

RESIDUALS SOURCE FACILITY SUMMARY
Applicant's name: City of Cherryville
Status
Code °
Facility Permit Holder
Facility Name
County
Permit Number
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year
Current n
Proposed
R
City of Cherryville
City of Cherryville WWTP
Gaston
NCO044440
273
273
'Status Code for source facility are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ D (Deleted)
b The amount of residuals currently permitted for distribution, land application, or disposal (i.e, not applicable to new facility).
SUMMARY FOR FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 1

o�0F w a rF,�QG
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
ft
'C RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION
FORM: RSC 08-11
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE -GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION (See Instruction B.):
1. Facility Name: City of Cherrvville WWTP
2. Facility permit holder is: ❑ Federal, 0 State, Local Government, or 11 Private.
Facility permit issued by: U Div. of Water Quality, Div. of Environmental Health,
or W Other (explain: �).
3. Facility contact person and title: Larry Wright, Plant Supervisor, ORC
Complete mailing address: 116 South Mountain Street
City: Cherryville State: NC Zip: 28021
Telephone number: [phone] E-mail address: lwrightkcityofcherryville.com
4. Facility physical address: 736 Tot Dellinger Road
City: Cherryville State: NC Zip: 28021
Coordinates: Latitude: 35' 24' 51" Longitude: 81' 22' 08"
Datum: NAD83 Level of accuracy: Second
Method of measurement: MAP
5. Purpose of the facility:
treatment of municipal wastewater, treatment of 100% domestic wastewater,
treatment of potable water, treatment of 100% industrial wastewater,
treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,
(approximate percentages: _ % industrial and _ % domestic)
other (explain: _ ).
6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: Yes No
7. Facility permitted/design flow: 2.0 MGD and facility average daily flow: 350,000 MGD
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at this facility 108.0 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: sludge holding tank: 248,000 gallons
Type and volume of residuals storage (i.e., outside of residuals treatment units): sludge lagoon: 250,000 gallons
II. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION (See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under:
40 CFR Part 503 or 40 CFR Part 257.
Note: Only residuals that are generated during domestic/municipal wastewater treatment processes are regulated under 40
CFR Part 503, otherwise, the residuals are regulated under 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are defined under 15A NCAC 02T.1102(6) as:
Biological 0 Non -Biological
FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 1 of 5

Note: Biological residuals are residuals that have been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater, animal
processing wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater (biological treatment is a system that utilizes
biological processes including lagoons, activated sludge systems, extended aeration systems, and fixed film systems).
3. Hazardous Waste Determination: Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non -hazardous under
RCRA: (Note - this item does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100% non -municipal, domestic wastewater only)
a. Are the residuals listed in 40 CFR §261.31-§261.33: " yes no.
If yes, list the number(s): _
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR §261.21-
261.24: 0 yes 0 no.
Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) analysis as
well as those for corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity:
Laboratory: Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Date(s) of analysis: 06/05/2019
Passed corrosivity test: 0 yes ❑ no. pH: 7_1 s.u. (2 < pH < 12.5)
Passed ignitability test: 0 yes Ld no. Flashpoint: >140 OF (> 140°F)
Passed reactivity test: W yes ❑Ino. HCN: nd mg/kg (<250) & H2S: nd mg/kg (<500)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(m917)
Result
(m917)
TCLP Parameter
Limit
(m917)
Result
(m917)
Arsenic
5.0
nd
Hexachlorobenzene
0.13
nd
Barium
100.0
nd
Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene
0.5
nd
Benzene
0.5
nd
Hexachloroethane
3.0
nd
Cadmium
1.0
nd
Lead
5.0
nd
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5
nd
Lindane
0.4
nd
Chlordane
0.03
nd
Mercury
0.2
nd
Chlorobenzene
100.0
nd
Methoxychlor
10.0
nd
Chloroform
6.0
nd
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
200.0
nd
Chromium
5.0
nd
Nitrobenzene
2.0
nd
m-Cresol
200.0
nd
Pentachlorophenol
100.0
nd
o-Cresol
200.0
nd
Pyridine
5.0
nd
p-Cresol
200.0
nd
Selenium
1.0
nd
Cresol
200.0
nd
Silver
5.0
nd
2,4-D
10.0
nd
Tetrachloroethylene
0.7
nd
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.5
nd
Toxaphene
0.5
nd
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5
nd
Trichloroethylene
0.5
nd
1, 1 -Dichloroethylene
0.7
nd
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
400.0
nd
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.13
nd
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.0
nd
Endrin
0.02
nd
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1.0
nd
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide
0.008
nd
Vinyl Chloride
0.2
nd
FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 2 of 5

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the residuals do not
violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 15A NCAC 02T .1105.
a. For Distribution/Land Application: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: WayPoint Analytical and Date of analysis: 05/24/2019
Parameter
Ceiling
Concentration Limits
(ClassA & ClassB)
(mglkg)
Monthly Average
Concentration Limits
(Class A Only)
(mglkg)
Result
(mglkg)
Arsenic
75
41
<5.0
Cadmium
85
39
2.57
Copper
4,300
1,500
996
Lead
840
300
34.7
Mercury
57
17
2.15
Molybdenum
75
n/a
8.44
Nickel
420
420
70.8
Selenium
100
100
<5.0
Zinc
7,500
2,800
897
b. For Surface Disposal Unit (landfill): Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight
basis) for the following metal parameters:
Laboratory: _ and Date of analysis: _
Distance from Disposal
Unit to Boundary to
Closest Property Line
(meters, check one)
Arsenic
(mg/kg)
Chromium
(mg/kg)
Nickel
(mg/kg)
N > 0 but < 25
30
200
210
❑ > 25 but < 50
34
220
240
❑ > 50 but < 75
39
260
270
❑ > 75 but < 100
46
300
320
❑ > 100 but < 125
53
360
390
❑ > 125
62
450
420
Result (mg/kg)
FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 3 of 5

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 4.51 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses (i.e., on a dry weight basis) for the following nutrient and
micronutrient parameters:
Laboratory: Waypoint Analytical and Date of analysis: 05/24/2019
Parameter
Result
(mglkg)
Aluminum
16,500
Ammonia -Nitrogen
4,220
Calcium
7,590
Magnesium
2,230
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
195
pH (Standard Unit)
6.7
Phosphorus
12,900
Potassium
1,700
Sodium
833
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
31,800
c. Using the results listed in Item II. 5b. above, calculate the sodium adsorption ration (SAR): 0.56
[Note: If residuals contain SAR of 10 or higher, the applicant shall obtain recommendations from the local Cooperative
Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, a
North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist, or an agronomist, prior to land application of residuals. The recommendations shall
address the sodium application rate, soil amendments (e.g., gypsum, etc.), or a mechanism for maintaining site integrity
and conditions conducive to crop growth].
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen (PAN) of the residuals: 30 %. This
rate is a (check one): JJ default value, or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater, explain or provide technical
justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these residuals: This is a default value for
water treatment plant alum residuals.
e. Calculate the PAN for the residuals (i.e., on a dry weight basis) and fill the results in the following table:
Application Method
First (15) Year PAN
Five -Year
Maximum Adjusted PAN
(mglkg)
(mg/kg)
Surface
10,579
15,960
Inj ection/Incorporation
12,689
18,070
Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the residuals and provide
the results of the latest analyses: No
FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 4 of 5

7. Pathogen Reduction: Per 15A NCAC 02T.1106, specify how residuals will meet the pathogen reduction requirements:
a. For Distribution/Land Application of Class A or Equivalent:
A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids,
or
A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the followings (except for non -biological residuals):
q Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(A)] - Time/Temperature Compliance.
q Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(13)] - Alkaline Treatment.
Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(C)] - Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
q Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(D)] - No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
J Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(b)(3)(E)-(K)] - Process to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP).
Specify one: ❑ composting, 0 heat drying, heat treatment,
❑ thermophilic aerobic digestion, beta ray irradiation,
❑ gamma ray irradiation, or pasteurization.
b. For Land Application of Class B.
Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(1)] - Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 106(c)(2)] - Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP).
Specify one: ® aerobic digestion, I
air drying, EI anaerobic digestion,
LJ composting, or lime stabilization.
c. For Surface Disposal:
Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7a. above.
Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II. 7b. above.
Exempt -If Daily Cover Alternative is chosen in Item II.8. below [15A NCAC 02T.1106(a)(2)].
E] Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
8. Vector Attraction Reduction (VAR): Per 15A NCAC 02T.1107, specify how residuals will meet the VAR requirements:
❑ Alternative 1 [15A NCAC 02T.1107(a)(1)] - 38% Volatile Solids Reduction (Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
Alternative 2 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(2)] - 40-Day Bench Scale Test (Anaerobic Digestion).
Alternative 3 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(3)] - 30-Day Bench Scale Test (Aerobic Digestion).
Alternative 4 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(4)] - Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test (Aerobic Digestion).
E] Alternative 5 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(5)] - 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
E] Alternative 6 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(6)] - Alkaline Stabilization.
Alternative 7 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(7)] - Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
E] Alternative 8 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(8)] - Drying of Unstabilized Residuals.
E] Alternative 9 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(9)] - Injection.
E] Alternative 10 [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(a)(10)] - Incorporation.
q Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only - Soil/Other Material Cover [15A NCAC 02T.I 107(b)(2)].
n Not Applicable - Non -Biological Residuals with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
Note: For animal processing residuals, only alternatives 9 or 10 may be chosen due to the nuisance conditions that typically
occur when these residuals are applied and left on the land surface.
FORM: RSC 08-11 Page 5 of 5

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0000430 (City of Cherryville)
Inspection Plan
Inspections will be conducted on a weekly basis at the land application site during activities of this project. Inspection
frequency is based on the time frame to complete the project and the amount of dry tons to be land applied from the
facility. The inspections will consist of inspecting a field that is currently being applied as well as inspecting random
fields that have been completed. These inspections will consist of:
1. Verifying that the "Pre -Operations Check List" has been completed and signed by both operational and technical
staff.
2. Checking the calculated loads to insure the correct amount of residuals are being land applied.
3. Insuring that all manned equipment has a copy of the spill control plan, the permit, and the operations and
maintenance plan.
4. Insuring that the field has been flagged properly and that all buffers are being adhered to.
5. Insuring that the "Crop and Landowner Verification" form has been filled out.
6. Verifying that the residuals have been adequately sampled to confirm compliance.
The records will be kept in the project files in the respective office for the project. The Permittee or Inspector shall
report by telephone to the NCDENR/DWR Mooresville Regional Office at 704-663-1699, as soon as possible, but no later
than 24 hours after, or the next working day, following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of the
following.
• Any occurrence with the distribution program resulting in the land application of significant amounts of
material that is abnormal in quantity or characteristics.
• Any failure of the program that results in a release of material to surface waters.
• Any time that self -monitoring information indicates that the program has gone out of compliance with
the permit.
• Any process unit failure that results in the system not adequately treating the residuals.
• Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
Any release that requires immediate reporting outside of normal business hours shall be called in to DENR at 800-662-
7956, 800-858-0368, or 919-733-3300. These numbers are to be called in the event of a release to surface waters or the
imminent failure of a storage system when the event occurs outside of normal business hours. Within 5 days of the first
notice of on occurrence, a written response in the form of a letter shall be sent to DENR outlining the actions taken or
proposed actions taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
Persons responsible for inspections on this project are as follows:
Mike Cox or his designee is responsible for inspections on this project .

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0000430 (City of Cherryville)
Sampling Plan
Sampling for this project consists of sampling the residuals just before land application is to occur. Based on
the dry tonnage of this plant, there will be one sample for each parameter per year.
The residuals shall be sampled annually for the following: (Regulatory level in milligrams per liter in parentheses.)
Arsenic (5.0)
1, 4-Dichlorobenzene (7.5)
Nitrobenzene (2.0)
Barium (100.0)
1, 2-Dichloroethane (0.5)
Pentachlorophenol (100.0)
Benzene (0.5)
1, 1-Dichloroethylene (0.7)
Pyridine (5.0)
Cadmium (1.0)
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene (0.13)
Selenium (1.0)
Carbon tetrachloride (0.5)
Endrin (0.02)
Silver (5.0)
Chlordane (0.03)
Hexachlorobenzene (0.13
Tetrachloroethylene (0.7)
Chlorobenzene (100.0)
Heptachlor (and its hydroxide) (0.008) Toxaphene (0.5)
Chloroform (6.0)
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene (0.5)
Trichloroethylene (0.5)
Chromium (5.0)
Hexachlorethane (3.0)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (400.0)
m-Cresol (200.0)
Lead (5.0)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (2.0)
o-Cresol (200.0)
Lindane (0.4)
2,4,5 TP ( Silvex) (1.0)
p-Cresol (200.0)
Mercury (0.2)
Vinyl Chloride (0.2)
Cresol (200.0)
Methoxychlor (10.0)
2,4-D (10.0)
Methyl ethyl ketone (200.0)
The residuals will also be sampled, based on the chart below, for the following constituents
Dry Tons Generated
(short tons per year)
Monitoring Frequency
(Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111)
<319
1 time per year
=>319-<1,650
1 per Quarter (4 times per year)
=>1,650-<16,500
1 every 60 days (6 times per year)
=>16500
1 every month (12 times per year)
Aluminum
Ammonia -Nitrogen
Arsenic
Cadmium
Calcium
Copper
Lead
Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
Magnesium
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Potassium
pH
Plant Available Nitrogen (calculation)
Selenium
Sodium
Total Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Zinc
In order to meet pathogen and vector requirements, the material will be sampled for fecal coliform density and the 30-
day bench test. The samples will be taken from the digester. Additional samples will be taken for TCLP/RCI and
nutrients and metals analysis. Methods of sampling will follow the conditions of the permit and applicable regulations.
The following people are responsible for sampling:
Marshall Puryear, Technical Services Manager or his designee.

SPILL RESPONSE PLAN
PROJECT: City of Cherryville Permit W00000430
IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT OF A SPILL, THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS SHALL BE
TAKEN IMMEDIATELY:
1. MANAGEMENT OF SPILL CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES:
The Operations Manager shall take immediate charge and initiate clean-up activities. Synagro
labor and equipment is to be utilized. In the event additional labor and equipment is required,
assistance may be requested from the City of Cherryville or the NC Department of
Transportation, and other private contractors as necessary.
2. HALT THE SOURCE OF THE SPILL:
Such as a ruptured container or damaged transport unit.
3. CONTAIN THE SPILL:
Form a barrier. Sufficient quantities of straw shall be used for such purposes. Earthen barriers
may be constructed to augment the straw bale containment area of the spill. The Operations
Manager or the person in charge on the spill site will advise the clean-up personnel where to get
the straw, lime, and other items necessary to complete the clean-up operation, i.e., local farmers,
farm supply centers, nurseries, etc.
4. CLEAN-UP:
Employ front-end loaders, vacuum equipment, sludge application vehicles, and/or local septic
tank service to remove as much of the spilled material as possible. Straw and/or sand should be
scattered in the spill area to soak up the remaining material. The straw- and sand -soaked material
will be collected and removed to a disposal area approved by representatives of the state
regulatory agency.
5. FINAL CLEAN-UP:
Employ rotary brush sweeper if needed, and apply lime to the spill area upon the approval of the
clean-up efforts by the state regulatory representative. If the event occurs on private property, the
clean-up will be completed to the satisfaction of the property owner and state regulatory
representatives. The ultimate goal will be to restore the spill area to its original condition if
possible.
6. NOTIFICATION:
As soon as possible after the spill occurs, the Synagro Operations Manager or assistant will notify
the Synagro Central office, and they will then be responsible for notifying other key Synagro
personnel.

7. REPORTING:
Synagro Central personnel will notify the Mooresville Regional office for The City of Cherryville
WWTP as soon as possible, but not more than 24 hours after, or on the next working day
following the occurrence. The Operations Manager shall provide a written report within 48 hours
of the spill to the Technical Services Manager. The report shall list all relative information and
actions taken. Synagro Central personnel will file a written report to the Mooresville Regional
office of the NCDENR within 5 days of the occurrence. For after hours reporting the Division's
emergency number shall be called to report all incidences (800-662-7956 or 800-858-0368 or
919-733-3300)
Contact Numbers:
Mocksville Regional Office- 336-790-1610

Quantitative Justification for Residuals Production Rate
Facility:
City of Cherryville WWTP
Maximum Permitted Rate:
273 dry tons/year
Justification:
The City of Cherryville's WWTP currently produces an average (for the past five years)
of just over 108 dry tons of biosolids per year. The calculations below indicate that the
average daily flow is less than one million gallons per day. The amount of production
has been variable, but, for the past five years, no greater than 70 percent of the permitted
tonnage (273 dry tons).
Calculations:
Based on rule -of -thumb that average daily flow is approximate to annual volume of
residuals produced:
(1,000,000 gal/yr) x (4 % solids) 8.5 lbs/gal) z 170 dt/yr
(2,000 lbs/ton)

Residuals Sampling Plan
City of Cherryville Land Application Program
Nutrient and Metal Analysis
Sampling Point: Biosolids Storage Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Annual or event specific
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Waypoint Analytical
Pathogen Reduction
Sampling Point: Biosolids Storage Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Annual or event specific
Sample Type: Grab
Lab: Cameron Testing Services, Inc.
Vector Attraction Reduction
Sampling Point: Biosolids Storage Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Annual or event specific
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Cameron Testing Services, Inc.
TCLP/RCI
Sampling Point: Biosolids Storage Lagoon
Sampling Frequency: Annual
Sample Type: Composite
Lab: Shealy Environmental

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION FOR WQ0000430 (City of Cherryville)
Operational Functions
The operational function of this project involves land application of residuals for the City of Cherryville's
wastewater treatment plant. This material will be loaded onto tractor trailers or "spreader trucks" and
hauled to land application sites. The residuals will be spread at agronomic rates, as determined by a
recently analyzed nutrients and metals sample. The material will be land applied with a liquid applicator
that will use pressure to achieve a consistent spread pattern. The fields applied will have a crop, either
established or planted soon after application, which is to be utilized for animal consumption.
Safety Measures
Synagro believes in operating in a safety -conscious manner and has all employees participate in
quarterly online safety courses. These courses are designed to help employees recognize safety issues
and take steps to prevent accidents from occurring. In addition, all Synagro employees have the
authority to stop operations if they think any aspect of the operation could cause environmental or
personal harm.
Maintenance Schedule
Synagro will follow the maintenance schedule specified by their fleet management section for the
equipment necessary to complete the job.

VICINITY MAP
SYNAGRO
i5
a�''rM1
h
i T
taus
•, r7V+
.e.
} l"y i,
e
t i9i0
k�
a
1736 Tot Dellinger Road
16 0 Fi636 16 77
b
��P Yi4
6421 aValmart Supercenter
i Sa
White Pines
$y.
Dellview ,,� -�,-� s• �
p96V4wrRd tL�
Cheryville
rp
x
°c i431 a
� s
F i4i6
Google
laze Hr
COUNTY: Gaston OWNER(S): Cherryville WWTP

t¢.
F
D
¢
uj
N
c
W
CA
w•
(j
w
uj
\ x
o
Lu
cr
V
z
\
A
w
cs
z
\y�,
Z
z
ea
�
a
A
r
O
z
_
U
A O_
-•r
-
m
ti z
Z
o a
w
J
d X
A O
�
A
�
�t
Lu
LLJ
a
W
¢
7 -+
Z
cr
FF6
W
C=
A
W. W
F-, q
LLI
a
o
Lid
V1N�
�P
osil
.
FIGURE 1-1
PLANT LAYOUT

Analytical Results
Synagro
284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
Receive Date: 05/14/2019
Reported: 05/15/2019
For: Cherryville WWTP
Comments: Geometric Mean: <1775 MPNIg
STATESVILLE
ANALYTICAL
Sample Number
Parameter
Sample ID
Result
Unit
Method
Analyzed
Analyst
190514-37-01
Fecal Coliforms
1
<2381
MPNIg
SM92210E-2oo6
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-01
Percent Solids
1
0.84
%
SM2540B-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-02
Fecal Coliforms
2
<1515
MPNIg
SM92210E-2oo6
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-02
Percent Solids
2
1.32
ova
SM25400-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-03
Fecal Coliforms
3
<1961
MPNIg
SM92210E-2006
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-03
Percent Solids
3
1.02
%
SM2540B-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-04
Fecal Coliforms
4
<1156
MPNIg
SM92210E-2006
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-04
Percent Solids
4
1.73
%
SM25408-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-05
Fecal Coliforms
5
<1905
MPN/g
SM92210E-2006
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-05
Percent Solids
5
1.05
%
SM2540a-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-06
Fecal Coliforms
6
<2105
MPNIg
SM92210E-2006
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-06
Percent Solids
6
0.95
1110
SM25408-2011
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-07
Fecal Coliforms
7
<1695
MPNIg
SM92210E-2006
05/14/2019
CL
190514-37-07
Percent Solids
7
1.18
%
SM2540B-2011
05/14/2019
CL
Respectfully submitted,
�0� ,411ft-." ,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA #NC00909
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 1 of 4

Condition of Receipt
Sample Number 190514-37-01 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
Sample Number 190514-37-02 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on lee
Sample Number 190514-37-03 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
Sample Number 190514-37-04 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
Sample Number 190514-37-05 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
Sample Number 190514-37-06 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 2 of 4

Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
Sample Number 190514-37-07 Temp on Arrival: 2.3
Parameter Schedule: Percent Solids
Received on Ice
Parameter Schedule: Fecal Coliforms
Sodium Thiosulfate Received on Ice
PO Box 228 • Statesville, NC 28687 • 704/872/4697
Page 3 of 4

O
ao
a
x
N
ry
00
rn
m
ro
rD
z
n
N
00
M
Do
V
m 00
V
o �
Cn
lD
v
Client:
rt
STA'[>?5VI4.LEANALYnCAL
] 22 Court sued PA Box 228
Address:
Statesville, NC 28687
[phone]
i
Chlain of
Contact Person: Phone #FAX#
�3fo (�
G U
Custody Record
PO # Requisitioned by: (Time Date)
Customer
Sample ICW
ta6dp #
Time sampled
(Grab Onl/)
pate Sampled
(Grab On9y)
Matrix
seudx w ww
p requested for analysis
ti.L4o
, raS
vto1
i3�i
.4"'
4)S
Relinquished by:
Time am<mDate SJ•,_TJj
Sampled by:
Received by:
Time am, pm Date- !
Transported by:
w--
Relinquished by:
Time am, pm Date / �/
Holding times met:
Received by:
Time am, pm Date �i _ J
Compliance work:
OMPOite SO[i1RJhg
#1:
Time begin am, pm Date
_I_f
Non-compliance work:
Time and am, pm Date
—J_!
Lab Comments: Samples Transported On ice:
Time begin am,
pm Date
f
Time end am,
pm Date
TI
I
Initials:

SUMM111
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOMZ3. INC
ArrzrJy0ca1 Laboralorhn
June 05, 2019
Erik Bruce
Synagro
284 Boger Rd.
Mocksville, NC 27028
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
RE: Cherryville WWTP
Dear Erik Bruce:
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
Order No.: 19051264
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. received 1 sample(s) on 5/16/2019 for the
analyses presented in the following report.
There were no problems with the analytical events associated with this report unless noted
in the Case Narrative.
Quality control data is within laboratory defined or method specified acceptance limits
except where noted.
If you have any questions regarding these tests results, please feel free to call the
laboratory.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Woolf
Project Manager
3310 Win St.
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arkansas 88-0735, California 07256CA, Colorado, Connecticut PH-0108, Delaware, Florida NELAC E87688, Georgia E87688, Idaho 01100923, Illinois
200061, Indiana C-011-13, Kansas E-10347, Kentucky (Underground Storage Tank) 3, Kentucky 90146, Louisiana 04061, Maryland 339, Minnesota
409711, New Hampshire 2996, New Jersey 011006, New York 11777, North Carolina 39705 and 631, North Dakota R-201, Ohio DW, Ohio VAT
CL0052, Oklahoma 9940, Oregon OH2O0001, Pennsylvania 010, Rhode Island LA000317, South Carolina 92016001, Texas T104704466-11-5, Utah
OH00923201 1 -1, Virginia VELAP 9456, Washington C891
Page 1 of 35

MM' Y Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. Case Narrative
SU3310 Win St.
ENVIRONMENTAL rEC„HQLOG4r;S,INC. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223 WO#: 19051264
Arralyi9cal Laboralorlas TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Wehsite: http://www.settek.com Date: 6/5/2019
CLIENT: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP
WorkOrder Narrative:
19051264: This report in its entirety consists of the following documents: Cover Letter, Case Narrative,
Analytical Results, QC Summary Report, Applicable Accreditation Information, Chain -of -Custody,
Cooler Receipt Form, and other applicable forms as necessary. All documents contain the Summit
Environmental Technologies, Inc., Work Order Number assigned to this report.
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc., holds the accreditations/certifications listed at the bottom of
the cover letter that may or may not pertain to this report. Please refer to the "Accreditation Program
Analytes Report" for accredited analytes list.
The information contained in this analytical report is the sole property of Summit Environmental
Technologies, Inc. and that of the customer. It cannot be reproduced in any form without the consent of
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. or the customer for which this report was issued. The results
contained in this report are only representative of the samples received. Conditions can vary at different
times and at different sampling conditions. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. is not responsible
for use or interpretation of the data included herein.
All results for Solid Samples are reported on an "as received" or "wet weight" basis unless indicated as
"dry weight" using the "-dry" designation on the reporting units.
This report is believed to meet all of the requirements of the accrediting agency, where applicable. Any
comments or problems with the analytical events associated with this report are noted below.
Analytical Sequence Sample Notes:
19051264-OOIA TCLP-SVOC_8270E: The CCV (Batch R98606) exhibited high recovery of 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene. The associated samples are ND for 2,4-Dinitrotoluene.
19051264-OOIA TCLP-SVOC-CPest(8081B): CCV exhibited high recoveries for Endrin. Associated
samples were ND
Revision v 1
Page 2 of 35

MM' Summit Environmental Technologies, In Qualifiers and Acronyms
SU3310 Win S
Ekiwlt OMM@N-rALTECHN❑LOG{r,S,INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio442� WO#: 19051264
ArralyUcal Laboralorlas TEL: [phone] FAX.- (330) 253-446
Wehsite: httn:11www.settek.co, Date: 6/5/2019
These commonly used Qualifiers and Acronyms may or may not be present in this report.
Qualifiers
U The compound was analyzed for but was not detected.
J The reported value is greater than the Method Detection Limit but less than the Reporting Limit.
H The hold time for sample preparation and/or analysis was exceeded.
D The result is reported from a dilution.
E The result exceeded the linear range of the calibration or is estimated due to interference.
MC The result is below the Minimum Compound Limit.
The result exceeds the Regulatory Limit or Maximum Contamination Limit.
in Manual integration was used to determine the area response.
d Manual integration in which peak was deleted
N The result is presumptive based on a Mass Spectral library search assuming a 1:1 response.
P The second column confirmation exceeded 25% difference.
C The result has been confirmed by GC/MS.
X The result was not confirmed when GC/MS Analysis was performed.
B/MB+ The analyte was detected in the associated blank.
G The ICB or CCB contained reportable amounts of analyte.
QC-/+ The CCV recovery failed low () or high (+).
R/QDR The RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QL-/+ The LCS or LCSD recovery failed low () or high (+).
QLR The LCS/LCSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QM-/+ The MS or MSD recovery failed low () or high (+).
QMR The MS/MSD RPD was outside of accepted recovery limits.
QV-/+ The ICV recovery failed low () or high (+).
S The spike result was outside of accepted recovery limits.
Z Deviation; A deviation from the method was performed; Please refer to the Case Narrative for
additional information
Acronyms
ND
Not Detected
RL
Reporting Limit
QC
Quality Control
MDL
Method Detection Limit
MB
Method Blank
LOD
Level of Detection
LCS
Laboratory Control Sample
LOQ
Level of Quantitation
LCSD
Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
QCS
Quality Control Sample
CRQL
Contract Required Quantitation Limit
DUP
Duplicate
PL
Permit Limit
MS
Matrix Spike
RegLvl
Regulatory Limit
MSD
Matrix Spike Duplicate
MCL
Maximum Contamination Limit
RPD
Relative Percent Different
MinCL
Minimum Compound Limit
ICV
Initial Calibration Verification
RA
Reanalysis
ICB
Initial Calibration Blank
RE
Reextraction
CCV
Continuing Calibration Verification
TIC
Tentatively Identified Compound
CCB
Continuing Calibration Blank
RT
Retention Time
PLC
Reporting Limit Check
CF
Calibration Factor
DF
Dilution Factor
RF
Response Factor
This list of Qualifiers and Acronyms reflects the most commonly utilized Qualifiers and Acronyms for reporting.
Please refer to the Analytical Notes in the Case Narrative for any Qualifiers or Acronyms that do not appear in this
list or for additional information regarding the use of these Qualifiers on reported data.
Revision v 1
Page 3 of 35

SUMMIT Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIROMMEWAL YECHNO ijULES. INC. Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Analytical Laboralorlas TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Wehsite: http://www.settek.com
CLIENT: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP
Lab SampleID Client Sample ID
19051264-001 Chenyville WWI'P
Tag No Date Collected
5/14/2019 11:00:00 AM
Workorder
Sample Summary
WO#: 19051264
05 Jun-l9
Date Received Matrix
5/16/2019 10:20:00 AM Sludge
Page 4 of 35

mm'y Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. DATES REPORT
su3310 Win St.
ENVIROIJMENTALTECHNOLOG 4r;S.INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223 WO#: 19051264
Arrzrjo�cal Laboralorhm TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com 05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP
Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection Date Matrix Test Name Leachate Date Prep Date Analysis Date
19051264-OOIA Chenyville WWTP 5/14/2019 11:00:00 AM Sludge Ignitability of Solids (SW-846: 1030)
6/3/2019 5:55:23 PM
pH (SW9045D)
5/31/2019 3:40:31 PM
Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.3.2)-Solid
5/17/2019 8:10:00 PM
Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.4.2
5/17/2019 8:10:00 PM
SVOC SW-846: 8151 Herbicides-TCL 5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/24/2019 2:15:00 PM
6/1/2019 8:31:00 AM
TCLP Mercury Analysis (SW1311/74 i 5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/20/2019 2:35:00 PM
5/20/2019 6:58:00 PM
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/6010 5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/20/2019 8:00:00 AM
5/22/2019 8:27:03 PM
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW 1311/6010 5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/20/2019 8:00:00 AM
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW 1311/8(5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/24/2019 1:00:06 PM
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis 5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/20/2019 1:00:00 PM
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
(SW1311/8270)
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
5/18/2019 6:00:00 PM
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Revision vl
Page 5 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
PESUMMIT 3310 Win St.
ENVITtONMENTALTECHNQLOGIE$,IRC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arralyi9cal Laboralorfas TEL: [phone] FAX. [phone]
Website: http://�i,-"-m,.settek.com
Analytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 19051264
Date Reported: 6/5/2019
CLIENT:
Synagro Tag Number:
Matrix:
SLUDGE Collection Date: 5/14/2019 11:00:00 AM
Lab ID:
19051264-OOIA
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
Client Sample ID Cherryville WWTP
Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
TCLP MERCURY ANALYSIS (SW1311/7470)
TCLP Mercury
ND 0.00500 mg/L
SW7470A SW7470A Analyst: DNS
1 5/20/2019 6:58:00 PM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
SW6010D
SW301OA Analyst: KMO
TCLP METALS ANALYSIS (SW131116010)
TCLP Arsenic(As)
ND
1.25
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
12.5
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Cadmium(Ccl)
ND
0.250
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
ND
0.500
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Lead(Pb)
ND
1.25
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 8:27:03 PM
TCLP Selenium(Se)
ND
0.125
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP Silver(Ag)
ND
1.25
mg/L
1
5/22/2019 4:04:46 PM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
SW8270
SW351OC Analyst: BJH
TCLP SEMI-VOLATILES ANALYSIS (SW1311/8270)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.0800
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
0.0400
QC+ mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Cresols, Total
ND
4.00
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND
0.0160
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
0.0400
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Hexachloroethane
ND
0.0800
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Nitrobenzene
ND
0.0800
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Pentachlorophenol
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Pyridine
ND
0.200
mg/L
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: 2-Fluorophenol
53.3
10 - 109
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: Phenol-d6
64.7
10 - 109
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
49.6
19 - 120
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
96.5
10 - 120
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
49.4
22 - 117
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
85.9
34 - 116
%Rec
2
5/21/2019 3:47:00 PM
Qualifiers: E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
M Manual Integration used to determine
area response
MC Value is below Minimum
Compound Limit.
N Tentatively identified compounds
ND Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P Second column
confirmation
exceeds
PL Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted
recovery limits Revision v 1
RL Reporting Detection Limit
U Samples with CalcVal <MDL
Page 6 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
PESUMMIT 3310 Win St.
ENVITtONMENTALTECHNQLOGIE$,IRC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrafyi9caf Laboralorfas TEL: [phone] FAX. [phone]
Website: http://�i,-"-m,.settek.com
Analytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 19051264
Date Reported: 6/5/2019
CLIENT:
Synagro Tag Number:
Matrix:
SLUDGE Collection Date: 5/14/2019 11:00:00 AM
Lab ID:
19051264-OOIA
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
Client Sample ID Cherryville WWTP
Analyses
Result
RL
Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
SW8081
SW351OC Analyst: SFG
TCLP PESTICIDES ANALYSIS
(SW1311/8081)
Chlordane, total
ND
0.0250
mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Toxaphene
ND
0.0500
mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Endrin
ND
0.00500
mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
gamma-BHC
ND
0.00500
d mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Heptachlor
ND
0.00500
mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
0.00500
mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Methoxychlor
ND
0.00500
d mg/L
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Surr: TCMX
61.7
10 - 119
%Rec
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
Surr: DCB
76.7
10 - 119
%Rec
10
5/31/2019 11:17:00 PM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
SVOC SW-846: 8151 HERBICIDES-TCLP
SW8151A SW8151A Analyst: MES
2,4-D
ND
0.0100
mg/L
1
6/1/2019 8:31:00 AM
2,4,5-TP
ND
0.00500
mg/L
1
6/1/2019 8:31:00 AM
Surr: 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic aci
70.8
20 - 140
%Rec
1
6/1/2019 8:31:00 AM
TCLP METALS, VOC, BNA, PEST, HERB -LIQUID
SW8260
Analyst: CTB
TCLP VOLATILES ANALYSIS
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/20195:32:00PM
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
MEK
ND
10.0
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Benzene
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Chlorobenzene
ND
5.00
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Chloroform
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Trichloroethene
ND
0.500
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.200
mg/L
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
102
70 - 130
%Rec
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
96.7
70 - 130
%Rec
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Surr: Toluene-d8
107
70 - 130
%Rec
100
5/20/2019 5:32:00 PM
Qualifiers: E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
M Manual Integration used to determine
area response
MC Value is below
Minimum
Compound Limit.
N Tentatively identified compounds
ND Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P Second column
confirmation
exceeds
PL Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted
recovery
limits Revision v 1
RL Reporting Detection Limit
U Samples with CalcVal <MDL
Page 7 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
PESUMMIT 3310 Win St.
ENVITtONMENTAL TECHNQLOGlr,$.IRC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arralyi9cal Laboralorfas TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://�i,-"-m,.settek.com
Analytical Report
(base report)
WO#: 19051264
Date Reported: 6/5/2019
CLIENT:
Synagro Tag Number:
Matrix:
SLUDGE Collection Date: 5/14/2019 11:00:00 AM
Lab ID:
19051264-OOIA
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
Client Sample ID Cherryville WWTP
Analyses
Result
RL Qual Units
DF
Date Analyzed
RCISOLID-W/ IGNITABILITY1030
SW9014
Analyst: MS
REACTIVE CYANIDE (9014/7.3.3.2)-SOLID
Cyanide, Reactive
ND
0.476 mg/Kg
1
5/17/2019 8:10:00 PM
RCISOLID-W/ IGNITABILITY1030
SW1030
Analyst: CXS
IGNITABILITY OF SOLIDS (SW-846: 1030)
Ignitability nonflammable
1
6/3/2019 5:55:23 PM
RCISOLID-W/ IGNITABILITY1030
SW9045D
Analyst: VVK
PH (SW9045D)
pH
7.1
s.u.@20.9C
1
5/31/2019 3:40:31 PM
RCISOLID-W/ IGNITABILITY1030
SW9034
Analyst: MS
REACTIVE SULFIDE (9034)/7.3.4.2
Sulfide, Reactive
ND
25.0 mg/Kg
1
5/17/2019 8:10:00 PM
Qualifiers: E
Value above quantitation range
M
Manual Integration used to determine area response
N
Tentatively identified compounds
O
RSD is greater than RSDlimit
PL
Permit Limit
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded
MC Value is below Minimum Compound Limit.
ND Not Detected
P Second column confirmation exceeds
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits Revision vl
U Samples with CalcVal <MDL
Page 8 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
Accreditation
Program
fr
3310 Win St.
summlmr
Anal�7n tes Report
ENOROMMEWAL IrECHHOL.OG{r,S,
INC, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
J
Y
Arralytical Laboralorlas
TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
WO#:
19051264
Wehsite: http://www.settek.com
05 Jun-l9
Client: Synagro
State: NW
Project: Cherryville WWTP
Program Name: NC—WW—SCM
Sample ID Matrix
Test Name
Analyte
Status
19051264-OOIA Sludge
Ignitability of Solids (SW-846: 1030)
Ignitability
A
Sludge
pH (SW9045D)
Hydrogen Ion (pH)
A
Sludge
Reactive Cyanide (9014/7.3.32)-Solid
Cyanide, Reactive
U
Sludge
Reactive Sulfide (9034)/7.3.42
Sulfide, Reactive
U
Sludge
SVOC SW-846: 8151 Herbicides-TCLP
2,4,5-TP
A
Sludge
SVOC SW-846: 8151 Herbicides-TCLP
2,4-D
A
Sludge
TCLP Mercury Analysis (SW1311/7470)
Mercury
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Arsenic
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Barium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Cadmium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Chromium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Lead
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Selenium
A
Sludge
TCLP Metals Analysis (SW1311/6010)
Silver
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Chlordane, total
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Endrin
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
gamma-BHC
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Heptachlor
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Heptachlor epoxide
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Methoxychlor
A
Sludge
TCLP Pesticides Analysis (SW1311/8081)
Toxaphene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Cresols, Total
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Hexachlorobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Hexachlorobutadiene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Hexachloroethane
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Nitrobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Pentachlorophenol
A
Sludge
TCLP Semi-Volatiles Analysis (SW1311/8270)
Pyridine
A
Key
Key
NC WW SCM A Accredited
NC WW SCM U Unavailable
Version #3
Page 9 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
Accreditation
Program
SUMMIEF
fr3310 Win St.
Anal�7n tes Report
EMOROMMEWAL YECHNOWGIES,
INC, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
J
Y
Arraly0cal Laboralorlas
TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
WO#:
19051264
Wehsite: http://www.settek.com
05 Jun-l9
Client: Synagro
State: NW
Project: Cherryville WWTP
Program Name: NC—WW—SCM
Sample ID Matrix
Test Name
Analyte
Status
19051264-OOIA Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
1,1-Dichloroethene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
1,2-Dichloroethane
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
2-Butanone
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Benzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Carbon tetrachloride
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Chlorobenzene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Chloroform
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Tetrachloroethene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Trichloroethene
A
Sludge
TCLP Volatiles Analysis
Vinyl chloride
A
NC WW SCM A Accredited NC WW SCM U Unavailable
Version #3
Page 10 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHMGLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37518
Sample ID 19051239-001AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98666
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/22/2019
SegNo: 2124011
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
2.27
0.500
2.000
0
113
70
130
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
2.000
0.2309
105
70
130
TCLP Cadmium(Cd)
2.04
0.100
2.000
0
102
70
130
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
2.16
0.200
2.000
0
108
70
130
TCLP Selenium(Se)
2.32
0.0500
2.000
0
116
70
130
TCLP Silver(Ag)
2.43
0.500
2.000
0.0007661
122
70
130
Sample ID 19051239-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98666
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/22/2019
SegNo: 2124012
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
2.19
0.500
2.000
0
109
70
130
2.267
3.48
20
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
2.000
0.2309
101
70
130
0
0
20
TCLP Cadmium(Cd)
1.96
0.100
2.000
0
97.8
70
130
2.036
4.02
20
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
2.08
0.200
2.000
0
104
70
130
2.159
3.78
20
TCLP Selenium(Se)
2.24
0.0500
2.000
0
112
70
130
2.323
3.45
20
TCLP Silver(Ag)
2.34
0.500
2.000
0.0007661
117
70
130
2.432
3.95
20
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 11 of 35

MM Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT
SUEF 3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHROLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com 05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37518
Sample ID 19051239-001AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98666
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/22/2019
SegNo: 2124063
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Lead(Pb) 2.16 0.500 2.000 0.01223 107 70 130
Sample ID 19051239-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98666
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/22/2019
SegNo: 2124064
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Lead(Pb) 2.16 0.500 2.000 0.01223 108 70 130 2.157 0.351 20
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
PL Permit Limit
E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 12 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHMGLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37518
Sample ID MB-37518
SampType: MBLK
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98499
Client ID: PBS
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2118254
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
ND
0.500
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
TCLP Cadmium(Cd)
ND
0.100
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
ND
0.200
TCLP Lead(Pb)
ND
0.500
TCLP Selenium(Se)
ND
0.0500
TCLP Silver(Ag)
ND
0.500
Sample ID LCS-37518
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
Mtl-TCLP-7(6 Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98499
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 37518
TestNo:
SW6010D SW3010A
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2118255
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Arsenic(As)
2.11
0.500
2.000
0
105
80
120
TCLP Barium(Ba)
ND
5.00
2.000
0
106
80
120
TCLP Cadmium(Cd)
1.95
0.100
2.000
0
97.3
80
120
TCLP Chromium(Cr)
2.19
0.200
2.000
0
110
80
120
TCLP Lead(Pb)
2.23
0.500
2.000
0
ill
80
120
TCLP Selenium(Se)
2.17
0.0500
2.000
0
108
80
120
TCLP Silver(Ag)
2.32
0.500
2.000
0
116
80
120
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 13 of 35

SUEF
MM
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHNOLOC4r.S. WC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes
TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
05-Jun-19
Client:
Synagro
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
BatchID: 37523
TCLP Mercury ND 0.00200
TCLP Mercury 0.00397 0.00200 0.00400 0 99.2 80 120
TCLP Mercury 0.00435 0.00200 0.00400 0.0000500 108 75 125
Sample ID 19051026-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode: HG_TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98535
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37523
TestNo: SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2117849
Analyte
Result
PQL SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
TCLP Mercury 0.00439 0.00200
0.00400 0.0000500 108 75
125
0.00435 0.915 20
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
Page 14 of 35

mm1 � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIIi014MENtAL I ECHNOLOG4EES, INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arra1yVca1 Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37523
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19051026-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
HG_TCLP(74 Units: PPM
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98535
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37523
TestNo:
SW7470A SW7470A
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2117849
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVI$lori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 15 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37528
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19051350-001AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98606
client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2120533
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.282
0.0800
0.8000
0
35.3
33.8
126
QMR
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.432
0.200
0.8000
0
54.0
28.7
144
QMR
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.451
0.200
0.8000
0
56.4
12.8
153
QMR
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.455
0.0400
0.8000
0
56.9
20.4
155
QC+QMR
Cresols, Total
ND
4.00
1.600
0
50.3
10
148
QMR
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.281
0.0160
0.8000
0
35.1
29
126
QMR
Hexachlorobenzene
0.352
0.0400
0.8000
0
44.0
33.7
134
QMR
Hexachloroethane
0.267
0.0800
0.8000
0
33.4
32.8
132
QMR
Nitrobenzene
0.358
0.0800
0.8000
0
44.8
20
158
QMR
Pentachlorophenol
0.473
0.200
0.8000
0
59.1
10
176
Pyridine
0.254
0.200
0.8000
0
31.7
10
130
Surr:2-Fluorophenol
0.404
1.000
40.4
3.39
130
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.457
1.000
45.7
5
130
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.344
1.000
34.4
14.5
154
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.524
1.000
52.4
19.5
130
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.350
1.000
35.0
34.4
130
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.539
1.000
53.9
8.86
156
Sample ID 19051350-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98606
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2120534
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVISlOri V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 16 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37528
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19051350-001AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98606
client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2120534
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.402
0.0800
1.600
0
25.2
33.8
126
0.2824
35.0
30
RS
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.625
0.200
1.600
0
39.1
28.7
144
0.4320
36.5
30
R
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.634
0.200
1.600
0
39.6
12.8
153
0.4508
33.8
30
R
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.654
0.0400
1.600
0
40.9
20.4
155
0.4548
35.9
30
RQC+
Cresols, Total
ND
4.00
3.200
0
34.9
10
148
0
0
30
R
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.423
0.0160
1.600
0
26.4
29
126
0.2808
40.5
30
RS
Hexachlorobenzene
0.498
0.0400
1.600
0
31.2
33.7
134
0.3520
34.4
30
RS
Hexachloroethane
0.374
0.0800
1.600
0
23.4
32.8
132
0.2668
33.6
30
RS
Nitrobenzene
0.513
0.0800
1.600
0
32.1
20
158
0.3580
35.6
30
R
Pentachlorophenol
0.607
0.200
1.600
0
37.9
10
176
0.4728
24.8
30
Pyridine
0.312
0.200
1.600
0
19.5
10
130
0.2536
20.5
30
Surr:2-Fluorophenol
0.590
2.000
29.5
3.39
130
0
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.646
2.000
32.3
10
130
0
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.500
2.000
25.0
14.5
154
0
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.776
2.000
38.8
19.5
130
0
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.507
2.000
25.4
34.4
130
0
S
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.754
2.000
37.7
8.86
156
0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVISlOri V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 17 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37528
Sample ID MB-37528
SampType: MBLK
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98559
Client ID: PBS
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119054
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
0.0400
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
0.100
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
0.0200
Cresols, Total
ND
2.00
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND
0.00800
Hexachlorobenzene
ND
0.0200
Hexachloroethane
ND
0.0400
Nitrobenzene
ND
0.0400
Pentachlorophenol
ND
0.100
Pyridine
ND
0.100
Surr: 2-Fluorophenol
0.486
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.605
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.501
Surr: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.585
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.566
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.676
1.000
48.6
10
109
1.000
60.5
10
109
1.000
50.1
19
120
1.000
58.5
10
120
1.000
56.6
22
117
1.000
67.6
34
116
Sample ID LCS-37528
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98559
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119055
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVISlOri V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 18 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37528
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID LCS-37528
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
SVOC-BNA T Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/20/2019
RunNo: 98559
client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 37528
TestNo:
SW8270 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119055
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.409
0.0400
0.8000
0
51.2
36.4
130
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
0.571
0.100
0.8000
0
71.4
31.7
132
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
0.570
0.100
0.8000
0
71.2
31.1
133
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
0.568
0.0200
0.8000
0
71.0
43.3
130
Cresols, Total
ND
2.00
1.600
0
65.2
31.7
130
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
0.403
0.00800
0.8000
0
50.4
31.4
130
Hexachlorobenzene
0.528
0.0200
0.8000
0
66.0
43.1
130
Hexachloroethane
0.396
0.0400
0.8000
0
49.5
36.5
130
Nitrobenzene
0.499
0.0400
0.8000
0
62.4
39.5
130
Pentachlorophenol
0.518
0.100
0.8000
0
64.8
34
130
Pyridine
0.138
0.100
0.8000
0
17.3
10
130
Surr: 2-Fluorophenol
0.604
1.000
60.4
17.1
130
Surr: Phenol-d6
0.648
1.000
64.8
10
130
Surr: Nitrobenzene-d5
0.615
1.000
61.5
32.6
130
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol
0.714
1.000
71.4
4.43
130
Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
0.621
1.000
62.1
41.8
130
Surr: p-Terphenyl-d14
0.814
1.000
81.4
36.4
130
m
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVISlOri V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 19 of 35

MM Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT
SUEF 3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHROLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223 WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com 05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: 37600
Sample ID MB-37600
SampType: MBLK
TestCode:
TCLP-SVOC- Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/24/2019
RunNo: 98799
Client ID: PBS
Batch ID: 37600
TestNo:
SW8081 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/24/2019
SegNo: 2142057
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Chlordane, total
ND
0.00250
Toxaphene
ND
0.00500
Endrin
ND
0.000500
gamma-BHC
ND
0.000500
d
Heptachlor
ND
0.000500
d
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
0.000500
d
Methoxychlor
ND
0.000500
d
Surr: TCMX
9.56
20.00 47.8 10 119
Surr: DCB
16.6
20.00 82.9 10 119
Sample ID LCS-37600
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
TCLP-SVOC- Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/24/2019
RunNo: 98799
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: 37600
TestNo:
SW8081 SW3510C
Analysis Date: 5/24/2019
SegNo: 2142058
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Endrin
0.0101
0.000500
0.0100
0
101
20
216
gamma-BHC
0.00768
0.000500
0.0100
0
76.8
20
197
Heptachlor
0.00679
0.000500
0.0100
0
67.9
20
200
Heptachlor epoxide
0.00803
0.000500
0.0100
0
80.3
20
200
Methoxychlor
0.00978
0.000500
0.0100
0
97.8
20
227
Surr: TCMX
11.5
20.00
57.5
20
143
Surr: DCB
18.7
20.00
93.5
20
151
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
PL Permit Limit
E Value above quantitation range
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or anal,
MC Value is below Minimum Compound
P Second column confirmation exceeds
RL Reporting Detection Limit
Revision vl
Page 20 of 35

SUEF
MM
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHROLOC4r.S.WC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes
TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
05-Jun-19
Client:
Synagro
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
BatchID: 37650
2,4-D ND 0.0100 0 0 d
2,4,5-TP ND 0.00500 0 0 d
Surr: DCAA 253 500.0 50.6 20 140
2,4-D
0.406 0.0100
0.500
0 81.2
43.8
130
2,4,5-TP
0.413 0.00500
0.500
0 82.6
51.5
ill
Surr: DCAA
597
500.0
119
34.2
150
Sample ID LCSD-37650
SampType: LCSD
TestCode:
TCLP-SVOC- Units: mg/L
Prep Date: 5/24/2019
RunNo: 99034
Client ID: LCSS02
Batch ID: 37650
TestNo:
SW8151A SW8151A
Analysis Date: 5/31/2019
SegNo: 2141489
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
2,4-D 0.408 0.0100 0.500 0 81.6 43.8 130 0.406 0.589 30
2,4,5-TP 0.428 0.00500 0.500 0 85.5 51.5 130 0.413 3.54 30
Surr: DCAA 292 500.0 58.3 34.2 150 0
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
PL Permit Limit
E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 21 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98525
Sample ID LCS-98525
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
Client ID: LCSW
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2117453
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0167
0.00500
0.0200
0
83.7
70
138
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0178
0.00500
0.0200
0
89.2
70
130
MEK
0.0961
0.0250
0.100
0
96.1
70
130
Benzene
0.0192
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.0
10
199
Carbon tetrachloride
0.0195
0.00500
0.0200
0
97.4
21.3
240
Chlorobenzene
0.0190
0.00500
0.0200
0
94.8
70
132
Chloroform
0.0193
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.5
70
130
Tetrachloroethene
0.0184
0.00500
0.0200
0
92.2
10
130
Trichloroethene
0.0193
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.6
70
130
Vinyl chloride
0.0189
0.00200
0.0200
0
94.3
70
130
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
50.8
50.00
102
70
130
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
47.6
50.00
95.2
70
130
Surr: Toluene-d8
54.2
50.00
108
70
130
Sample ID MB-98525
SampType: MBLK
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
Client ID: PBW
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2117457
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
0.00500
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
0.00500
MEK
ND
0.0250
Benzene
ND
0.00500
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND
Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 22 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98525
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID MB-98525
SampType: MBLK
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
client ID: PBW
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2117457
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
0.00500
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.00500
Chloroform
ND
0.00500
Tetrachloroethene
ND
0.00500
Trichloroethene
ND
0.00500
Vinyl chloride
ND
0.00200
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
50.3
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
47.4
Surr: Toluene-d8
54.0
50.00 101 70 130
50.00 94.9 70 130
50.00 108 70 130
Sample ID 19051144-00laMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119583
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.131
0.0500
0.200 0 65.3
63.8
148
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.170
0.0500
0.200 0 85.0
70
130
MEK
0.943
0.250
1.00 0 94.3
10
130
Benzene
0.727
0.0500
0.200 0.547 89.9
70
130
Carbon tetrachloride
0.142
0.0500
0.200 0 71.0
70
130
Chlorobenzene
0.173
0.0500
0.200 0 86.2
70
130
Chloroform
0.180
0.0500
0.200 0 90.2
70
130
Tetrachloroethene
0.142
0.0500
0.200 0 70.8
70
130
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E
Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal,
J
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M
Manual Integration used to determine area
response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND
Not Detected
O
RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R
RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
Page 23 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHMGLOC4r.S.WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98525
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19051144-00laMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119583
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Trichloroethene
0.167 0.0500
0.200
0 83.7
70
130
Vinyl chloride
0.138 0.0200
0.200
0 69.2
53.9
141
Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
507
500.0
101
70
130
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
471
500.0
94.2
70
130
Surr: Toluene-d8
544
500.0
109
70
130
Sample ID 19051144-00laMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119584
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.144
0.0500
0.200 0
72.0
63.8
148
0.131 9.83
30
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.174
0.0500
0.200 0
87.2
70
130
0.170 2.61
25
MEK
0.927
0.250
1.00 0
92.7
10
130
0.943 1.69
25
Benzene
0.716
0.0500
0.200 0.547
84.6
70
130
0.727 1.48
30
Carbon tetrachloride
0.157
0.0500
0.200 0
78.4
70
130
0.142 9.91
25
Chlorobenzene
0.176
0.0500
0.200 0
88.2
70
130
0.173 2.29
30
Chloroform
0.182
0.0500
0.200 0
91.1
70
130
0.180 0.883
25
Tetrachloroethene
0.154
0.0500
0.200 0
77.0
70
130
0.142 8.25
25
Trichloroethene
0.174
0.0500
0.200 0
87.2
70
130
0.167 4.10
30
Vinyl chloride
0.134
0.0200
0.200 0
66.8
53.9
141
0.138 3.60
25
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
510
500.0
102
70
130
0
25
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 468
500.0
93.7
70
130
0
25
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E
Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal,
J
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M
Manual Integration used to determine area
response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND
Not Detected
O
RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R
RPD outside accepted recovery
limits
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
Page 24 of 35

mm1 � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIIi014MENtAL I ECHNOL0i,IEES, INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arra1yVca1 Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98525
Sample ID 19051144-00laMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
voc-mstr_np Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/21/2019
SegNo: 2119584
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Surr: Toluene-d8
547
500.0
109 70 130
0 25
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVI$lori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 25 of 35

MMI� Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHNOLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98525
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID LCS-98525
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
tclp-voc-mstr Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98525
client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: R98525
TestNo:
SW8260
Analysis Date: 5/20/2019
SegNo: 2119592
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.0167
0.00500
0.0200
0
83.7
79.4
131
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.0178
0.00500
0.0200
0
89.2
73.6
137
MEK
ND
0.100
0.100
0
96.1
55.1
163
Benzene
0.0192
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.0
73.1
132
Carbon tetrachloride
0.0195
0.00500
0.0200
0
97.4
63.7
139
Chlorobenzene
ND
0.0500
0.0200
0
94.8
72.3
139
Chloroform
0.0193
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.5
79.3
129
Tetrachloroethene
0.0184
0.00500
0.0200
0
92.2
56.2
187
Trichloroethene
0.0193
0.00500
0.0200
0
96.6
64.1
138
Vinyl chloride
0.0189
0.00200
0.0200
0
94.3
22.1
147
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene
50.8
50.00
102
80.4
126
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
47.6
50.00
95.2
70.3
125
Surr: Toluene-d8
54.2
50.00
108
82
117
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 26 of 35

SUEF
MM
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVI;i014MENTALTECHROLOC4r.S.WC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223
WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes
TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
05-Jun-19
Client:
Synagro
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
BatchID: R98750
Cyanide, Reactive ND 0.485
Cyanide, Reactive 9.43 0.490 10.00 0 94.3 85 115
Cyanide, Reactive 0.524 0.490 0.5000 0 105 50 150
Sample ID 19051158-011AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98750
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98750
TestNo:
SW9014
Analysis Date: 5/17/2019
SegNo: 2129319
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Cyanide, Reactive
10.0 0.500
10.00 0.3081 97.3 81.3
118
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal,
J
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND
Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
Page 27 of 35

MM Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT
SUEF 3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHNOLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com 05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98750
Sample ID 19051158-011AMS
SampType: MS
TestCode:
Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98750
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98750
TestNo:
SW9014
Analysis Date: 5/17/2019
SegNo: 2129319
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sample ID 19051158-011AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
Cyanide,Rea Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98750
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98750
TestNo:
SW9014
Analysis Date: 5/17/2019
SegNo: 2129320
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Cyanide, Reactive 10.2 0.500 10.00 0.3081 98.7 81.3 118 10.04 1.39 5
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
PL Permit Limit
E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 28 of 35

SUEF
MM
Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
QC SUMMARY REPORT
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHROLOC4r.S. WC
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes
TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
05-Jun-19
Client:
Synagro
Project:
Cherryville WWTP
BatchID: R98776
Sulfide, Reactive ND 25.0
Sulfide, Reactive 4560 25.0 4800 0 95.0 85 115
Sulfide, Reactive 4720 25.0 4800 0 98.3 75 125
Sample ID 19051158-011AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
Sulfide,React Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98776
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98776
TestNo:
SW9034
Analysis Date: 5/17/2019
SegNo: 2130210
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Sulfide, Reactive
4680 25.0
4800 0 97.5 75
125
4720 0.851 30
Qualifiers: B
Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
E Value above quantitation range
H
Holding times for preparation or anal,
J
Analyte detected below quantitation limits
M Manual Integration used to determine area response
MC
Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
ND
Not Detected
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit
P
Second column confirmation exceeds
PL
Permit Limit
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits
RL
Reporting Detection Limit
Page 29 of 35

mm1 � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIIi014MENtAL I ECHNOLOG4EES, INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arra1yVca1 Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98776
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19051158-011AMSD
SampType: MSD
TestCode:
Sulfide,React Units: mg/L
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98776
Client ID: BatchQC
Batch ID: R98776
TestNo:
SW9034
Analysis Date: 5/17/2019
SegNo: 2130210
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVI$lori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 30 of 35

MM Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. QC SUMMARY REPORT
SUEF 3310 Win St.
ENVI;i014MENTAL I ECHNOLOC4r.S. WC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 WO#: 19051264
Arrzr/yVcaf Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com 05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98995
Sample ID LCS-R98995
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
pH_S(9045D) Units: s.u.@22.00
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98995
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: R98995
TestNo:
SW9045D
Analysis Date: 5/31/2019
SegNo: 2139142
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
pH 7.0 7.0 0 100 90 110
Sample ID CHECK 7
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
pH_S(9045D) Units: s.u.@22.3C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98995
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: R98995
TestNo:
SW9045D
Analysis Date: 5/31/2019
SegNo: 2140377
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
pH 7.0 7.0 0 101 90 110
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
ND Not Detected
PL Permit Limit
E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVlSlori V 1
O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 31 of 35

mm1 � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIIi014MENtAL I ECHNOLOG4EES, INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arra1yVca1 Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R98995
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Sample ID 19052000-001BDUP
SampType: DUP
TestCode:
pH_NPW(450 Units: s.u.@20.3C
Prep Date:
RunNo: 98995
�lient ID: Batch=
Batch ID: R98995
TestNo:
SW9045D
Analysis Date: 5/31/2019
SegNo: 2140375
analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC
Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
pH
M
6.9 0.6 5
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVI$lori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 32 of 35

mm1 � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 Win St.
ENVIIi014MENtAL I ECHNOL0i,IEES, INC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Arra1yVca1 Laboralorfes TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://www.settek.com
QC SUMMARY REPORT
WO#: 19051264
05-Jun-19
Client: Synagro
Project: Cherryville WWTP BatchID: R99073
Sample ID LCS-R99073
SampType: LCS
TestCode:
Ignitability_S Units:
Prep Date:
RunNo: 99073
Client ID: LCSS
Batch ID: R99073
TestNo:
SW1030
Analysis Date: 6/3/2019
SegNo: 2142958
Analyte
Result
PQL
SPK value SPK Ref Val
%REC Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val
%RPD RPDLimit Qual
Ignitability
7.94
7.240 0 110 70 130
Qualifiers: B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or anal,
J Analyte detected below quantitation limits M Manual Integration used to determine area response MC Value is below Minimum Compound
ReVI$lori V 1
ND Not Detected O RSD is greater than RSDlimit P Second column confirmation exceeds
PL Permit Limit R RPD outside accepted recovery limits RL Reporting Detection Limit
Page 33 of 35

Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
3310 will street
Analysis Request/Chain of Custody
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
Tel: [phone] Fax: 330,253.4489 I or 5url]miL (;aviresnlllental Technologies, Inc- use o
Company Name {I'lea4e PrinlS
Projccs Nalkrc
Pagrz�,r
sl"T No
S.
Analytical hirameters and !4leihads
Ceml ny A d •v�
Prajocl Adel is
Client Phone No-
lL}x,n fa
Cknl Fax No. Please FaxktDLults
Clicnl Enlail Y e36sr Emai . xsuHs J
Q wle No.
� 11
GC
Cl)1ft:1tl F'[: ntil F[r
p
m
yy
V
S.mrpled by
i heck if Ohio VAP +ampler J
n
w
U
ri
r
rL
•�
•f Oa0
r �
�
C
J
t
# Sample lrlclslificaliern
Ira le
15me
{ ulkertcd
Colle7l¢d
.7
V
d'Ir..r i ,i:. L AII:Ji'I lril kM�n
I% ON 5 - , Nutcsl['umment%;
�ralc Of Sulbp c C np,
ORCY]MPIJANCI, yE" NU
FRTIACATON kFCMi1Rl 7;��j 1I7 N[7
[PORT 7 O SiATP. { p W ONLY) i'f-:S
Rcrritrd i n lab, hv'- Ualc 'lime Mnsf he a i owed f if yek pleatir pm+Ide Pws. 5 ru. & r RkLSIF k44]UCSIC� �y; I �. ,ry�x�r arrry,lu4. 9r-:4.la. .sunr!s M— n rm�n Ia:iJµ, :inu
Mle by Iah rnanager P 11` �3 W��r ni l rq . riw v m,1 fl- .
Whim and ycllcvw pages should amurnpany mFnpl, i,, the Iahew Iury. "Ilk (;lie -?A ML"ac 11w P11A hype-,
121473
Page 34 of 35

�� � � Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc.
SU3310 Win St.
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGa1�S.IfiC Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio44223 Sample Log -In Check List
Arrafocaf Laboralorias TEL: [phone] FAX.- [phone]
Website: http://`h,,",m,.settek.com
Client Name: SYN-NC-27028 Work Order Number: 19051264 RcptNo: 1
Logged by: Kayla L. Oulton 5/16/2019 10:20:00 AM
Completed By: Jesseca E. Westfall 5/16/2019 5:34:18 PM
Reviewed By: Jennifer Woolf 5/17/2019 3:21:16 PM
Chain of Custody
1. Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes d❑ No ❑ Not Present ❑
2. How was the sample delivered? UPS
Log In
3. Coolers are present? Yes d❑ No ❑ NA ❑
4.
Shipping container/cooler in good condition?
Yes
d❑
No
❑
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Yes
❑
No
❑
Not Present ❑d
No. Seal Date:
Signed By:
5.
Was an attempt made to cool the samples?
Yes
V
No
❑
NA ❑
6.
Were all samples received at a temperature of >0° C to 6.0°C
Yes
V
No
❑
NA ❑
7.
Sample(s) in proper container(s)?
Yes
V
No
❑
8.
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
Yes
V
No
❑
9.
Are samples (except VOA and ONG) properly preserved?
Yes
V
No
❑
10.
Was preservative added to bottles?
Yes
❑
No
V
NA ❑
1 1 . Is the headspace in the VOA vials less than 1/4 inch or 6 mm?
Yes
❑
No
❑ No VOA Vials ❑�
12. Were any sample containers received broken?
Yes
❑
No
V
13. Does paperwork match bottle labels?
Yes
V
No
❑
(Note discrepancies on chain of custody)
14. Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody?
Yes
V
No
❑
15. Is it clear what analyses were requested?
Yes
V
No
❑
16. Were all holding times able to be met?
Yes
No
❑
(If no, notify customer for authorization.)
Special Handling (if applicable)
17. Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order?
Yes
❑
No
❑ NA V
Person Notified: Date
By Whom: Via: ❑ eMail ❑ Phone ❑ Fax ❑ In Person
Regarding:
Client Instructions:
18. Additional remarks:
Cooler Information
Cooler No
Temp °C
Condition
I Seal Intact
Seal No
Seal Date
Signed By
1
14.6
Goodl
Not Present
Page 35 of 35

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
5/24/2019
Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 19-136-0211
Project Description: Cherryville WWTP
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 5/16/2019 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
�a f• c•—r
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Virginia 460014
"1'4
Page 1 of 6

•
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Waypoint
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 19-136-0211
Client Project Description: Cherryville WWTP
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Method Lab ID
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
66425
Cherryville WWTP
Solids
05/14/2019
11:00
05/16/2019
SM-4500-NH3C
WTN
9045D
WTN
4500NO3F-2011
WTN
6010D
WTN
SW-7471B
WTN
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
WTN
SM-2540G
WTN
WTN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN, Certification: #1354
Page 2 of 6

Report Number: 19-136-0211
Account Number: 46442
Waypoint.
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Send To: Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville , NC 27028
Lab Number: 66425
Sample Id : Cherryville WWTP
Project: Cherryville WWTP
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 5/14/2019 11:00:00
Date Received: 05/16/2019 00:00
Date Reported: 05/24/2019
Total Solids
4.51
ADM
05/21/2019 16:54
SM-2540G
Moisture'
95.50
ADM
05/21/201916:54
SM-2540G
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
3.18
31800
250
CLP
05/23/2019 13:30
SM-4500-NH3C-TKN
Phosphorus
1.29
12900
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Potassium
0.17
1700
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Sulfur
0.79
7880
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Calcium
0.76
7590
250
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Magnesium
0.22
2230
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Sodium
0.08
833
250
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Iron
28300
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Aluminum
16500
50.0
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Manganese
443
5.00
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
6010D
Copper
996
2.50
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
6010D
Zinc
897
12.5
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
6010D
Ammonia Nitrogen
0.42
4220
100
ZBD
05/23/2019 16:00
SM-4500-NH3C
Organic N
2.76
27580
250
05/23/2019 13:30
CALCULATION
Nitrate+Nitrite-N
195
4.71
ZBD
05/22/201913:46
4500NO3F-2011
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
B-Analyte detected in blank
H - Beyond Holding
Time
Powir,
#1C 10"
rf
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or part, nor may any reference be made Pauric McGroary
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
Agronomist
Page 3 of 6

Report Number: 19-136-0211
Account Number: 46442
Waypoint.
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 ° Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Send To: Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville , NC 27028
Lab Number: 66425
Sample Id : Cherryville WWTP
Project: Cherryville WWTP
REPORT OF ANALYSIS Date Sampled: 5/14/2019 11:00:00
Date Received: 05/16/2019 00:00
Date Reported: 05/24/2019
Cadmium
2.57
1.00
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Chromium
147
2.50
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Nickel
70.8
2.50
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Lead
34.7
3.00
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Arsenic
<5.00
5.00
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Mercury
2.15
0.0143
TJS
05/22/2019 12:37
SW-7471 B
Selenium
<5.00
5.00
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
pH'
6.7
JSL
05/21/2019 08:40
9045D
Molybdenum
8.44
2.50
KKM
05/21/2019 23:43
601 OD
Comments:
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted by asterisk. Detection
limit on all N series
is on a wet basis.
B-Analyte detected in blank
H - Beyond Holding Time
I i�G�QQN
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients, and may not be reproduced in whole or part, nor may any reference be made Pauric McGroary
to the work, the results, or the company in any advertising, news release, or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
Agronomist
Page 4 of 6

WayPAoInt..
NALYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 2-4237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Cooler Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46442
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Report Number: 19-136-0211
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab
® UPS 0 Client 0 Courier
0 Other:
Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
0 Yes
0 No
Number of coolers received
F-71
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No
! Not Required
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
® Not Required
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
0 Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
0 Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
0 Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
0 No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
0 No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
® N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
® N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 — compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
0 N/A
F_ High concentration container (48 hr) F_ Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
F_ High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d) F_ Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included? 0 Yes ® No
Comments:
Signature: lBrandi Watson Date & Time: 05/16/2019 13:46:49
Page 5 of 6

ro
(4
m
rn
0
rn
rn
SAMPLIIVGLoG# j��
111�«�I�I�IINIII�i��ll��ll��l��ll�l��fllll�l���1�11��11f�1�1��o
.AI�S,iNC. � ���� � �����DY
Ch,,,,,jlr
5-75-20is S p 3
CUSTOMER: SYNAGRC
Che1FVVFjle VVWTP
13:44:33 RECORD
=st that the groper field sampling procedures
PROJECT MANAGER:
were used during the collection of these samples,
Phone:
SAMPtEPF—
A&L CUSTOMER
SAMPLING
SAMPLE
# OF SAMPLING METHOD METHOD
LAD ## SAMPLE I.R.
LOCATION
TYPE
CONTAINERS DATE TIME PRESERVED SHIPPED
Ct�rr4�•��Q
ikA,�r'� t r'Y4iA
���
S .SA Ir;Cc ICE (-1-tnI-PI~
Relinquished by Sampler: Date Time Recleved by: REMARKS:
.5/o Z � GG
Relinquished by- --C- ❑ate Time Vey{ by: _
J
ft(D I I q -��s
Relinquished by: Dat Time Racleved by:
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
WoFar srnrE> monitoring purposes. PO.#:
s
SAMPLE
ANALYSIS REQUEST
SL1 SL2 NH4 N NO3 N ❑rganee Cd Cr � Ni I Pb As ' 49 se P11 CaCO3 Volatile
Solids MO. Cl ND2�fll
poor PO ;0001
SL1: Total Solids (Moisture), Total K;eldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium
SL2: Basic Test SLI plus Sulfur, Calcium, Magnesium, Sodium, Iron, Aluminum, Manganese, Copper and Zinc

Waypointo
ANALYTICAL
4/14/2020
Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Mary Brewer
284 Boger Road
Mocksville, NC, 27028
Ref: Analytical Testing
Report Number: 20-099-0001
Project Description: Calvin Wehunt
Cherryville WWTP
LT-107
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Dear Mary Brewer:
Waypoint Analytical Virginia, Inc. received sample(s) on 4/8/2020 for the analyses presented in the following
report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method. Sub -contracted testing is noted on the Sample Summary Table
if applicable.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters (NELAP and non-NELAP) were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA
(including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2012) and NELAC unless otherwise indicated.
Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as -
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report.
Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Pam« mar,--
Pauric McGroary
Agronomist
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
Page 1 of 7

•
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Waypoint
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
ANALYTICAL www.waypointanalytical.com
Sample Summary Table
Report Number: 20-099-0001
Client Project Description: Calvin Wehunt
Cherryville WWTP
LT-107
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Method Lab ID
70986 4 Solids 04/08/2020 SW-7471B WP MTN
70987 5 Solids 04/08/2020 SW-7471B WP MTN
70988 6 Solids 04/08/2020 SW-7471B WP MTN
WP MTN - Memphis, TN: Waypoint Analytical - TN, Memphis, TN
Page 2 of 7

WayPANALYTICAL
46442
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville Alex Fox
Mary Brewer Project Calvin Wehunt Report Date : 04/14/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Cherryville WWTP Received : 04/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 LT- 107 mL 60wr
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Pauric McGroary
Report Number : 20-099-0001 REPORT OFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 70986 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 4 Sampled:
Test
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0256 mg/Kg 0.0148 1 04/13/2011:19 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 3 of 7

WayPANALYTICAL
46442
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville Alex Fox
Mary Brewer Project Calvin Wehunt Report Date : 04/14/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Cherryville WWTP Received : 04/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 LT- 107 mL 60wr
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Pauric McGroary
Report Number : 20-099-0001 REPORT OFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 70987 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 5 Sampled:
Test
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0225 mg/Kg 0.0152 1 04/13/2011:20 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 4 of 7

WayPANALYTICAL
46442
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville Alex Fox
Mary Brewer Project Calvin Wehunt Report Date : 04/14/2020
284 Boger Road Information : Cherryville WWTP Received : 04/08/2020
Mocksville , NC 27028 LT- 107 mL 60wr
Submitted By : Alex Fox
Pauric McGroary
Report Number : 20-099-0001 REPORT OFANALYSIS Agronomist
Lab No : 70988 Matrix: Solids
Sample ID : 6 Sampled:
Test
Results Units MQL DF Date / Time By Analytical
Analyzed Method
Mercury 0.0540 mg/Kg 0.0146 1 04/13/2011:22 DDB SW-7471B
Qualifiers/ DF Dilution Factor L Limit Exceeded
Definitions MQL Method Quantitation Limit
Page 5 of 7

WayPAoInt..
NALYTICAL
7621 Whitepine Road, Richmond, VA 23237
Main 804-743-9401 0 Fax [phone]
www.waypointanalytical.com
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number: 46442
Customer Name: Synagro Central LLC/ Cherryville
Report Number: 20-099-0001
Shipping Method
0 Fed Ex 0 US Postal 0 Lab
® UPS 0 Client 0 Courier
0 Other:
Thermometer ID:
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
0 Yes
0 No
Number of coolers/boxes received
F-71
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
0 Yes
0 No
! Not Present
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
0 Yes
0 No
® Not Present
Chain of Custody (COC) present?
0 Yes
0 No
COC agrees with sample label(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
COC properly completed
0 Yes
0 No
Samples in proper containers?
0 Yes
0 No
Sample containers intact?
0 Yes
0 No
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
0 Yes
0 No
All samples received within holding time?
0 Yes
0 No
Cooler temperature in compliance?
0 Yes
® No
Cooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
0 Yes
® No
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
0 Yes
0 No
® N/A
Water - VOA vials free of headspace
0 Yes
0 No
® N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
0 Yes
0 No
N/A
Soil VOA method 5035 — compliance criteria met
0 Yes
0 No
0 N/A
F_ High concentration container (48 hr)
F_ High concentration pre -weighed (methanol -14 d)
F_ Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
F_ Low conc pre -weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
Special precautions or instructions included? 0 Yes ® No
Comments:
Signature: lBrandi Watson Date & Time: 04/08/2020 09:59:41
Page 6 of 7

Waypoint.0
ANALYTICAL
5 III ir���� 1111111111111111111 IN ti1i 46"2
��,
Svnawa Central LLC. w Cherrille fl4-08-2026
calvm 1Nehunl
09 58.07
Account #
Grower/Project Information _ nformation
t14k_11__
Submitted By
Charge To
L',/ V
Farm ID
Field ID
Credit Card #
CSV
Exp. Date.
Phone #
76
E-mail address
S
Crop Info For Recommendations
Sample ID
Lab Number
(Lab Use
Only)
SIM
S2M - Specify additional
Tests
S3M
Soluble
Sall's
Texture
NOa-N
Additional
Tests
Intended
Crop
Yield
Goal
Alternative
Crop
Yield
Goal
previous Crop
B
Cu
Fe
Mn
Na
5
Zn
s
u
Mehlich
III
Test Mackages
Special
Instructions or Additional
Tests
S1M - Organic matter, Phosphorus, Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, pH, Buffer pH
Cation Exchange Capacity, and % Base Saturation.
S2l'JI - Test S1 M plus any two of the following: Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc,
Manganese, Iron, Copper. Each additional test (above two) cost 100.
PM - Test S 1 M pi us Sodium, Sulfur, Boron, Zinc, Manganese, Capper, and iron.
J4 fC u P �

DWR
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Division of Water Resources
COUNTY BOARD NOTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: CBN 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two conies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
General — This notification is intended to provide the county board in which the land application site is proposed to be located with
general information on the size, location and type of residuals land application proposed to occur in their county, and to give them an
opportunity to comment on the pending permitting request as stipulated in Session Law 2013-340. Notification is not required for
fields deemed permitted to receive Class A residuals under 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this document for review
without a corresponding residuals program application form (FORM: RLAP 11-15).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15). Please do not make any
unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the form may
be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® Prepare a separate County Board Notification (FORM: CBN 11-15) for each county in which the proposed land application
sites are located.
B. Critical Watershed Areas Information:
® Under 15A NCAC 02B .0212, no new permitted sites for land application of residuals are allowed within critical watershed
areas. It is the Applicant's responsibility to ensure that the proposed land application sites are not located within these areas.
® For more information regarding Water Supply Watershed Protection Program, please visit the Division website at:
httDs:Hdea.nc. gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-rules/water-supply-watershed-protection-pro exam
® If uncertain about whether the proposed sites are located within the critical areas, contact the Division or call [phone].
C. Notification Package Submission:
® Complete and mail the notification letter, source facility summary, land application site summary, and site location maps to
the appropriate County Board by certified mail with a return receipt requested. It is recommended that a copy of the
notification package also be sent to the County Manager.
® The most current publication of the Directory of State and County Officials may be downloaded at:
hM?s://www.sosnc.goy/publications/direct.aspx
® A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
hM2:Hdeg.nc.gov/contact/regional-offices.
® The source facility summary shall include: facility name; county where it is located; and the proposed annual dry tonnage
(i.e., a copy of "Residuals Source Facility Summary" is adequate but not required).
® The land application site summary shall include: field ID; acreage; county where it is located; latitude and longitude (i.e., a
copy of "Land Application Site Certification" is adequate but not required).
D. Proof of Submission:
® Attach an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the return receipt to the back of this attachment prior to submission of the application to the
Division for review.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: CBN 06-16 Page 1 of 1

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
Date: 01/2/2020
To: Name of Chairman to the Board of County Commissioners: Carrol Mitchem
Complete mailing address: 7868 Hallman Mill Road
City: Vale
State: NC Zip: 28168
County where land application sites are located: Lincoln
From: Applicant's name: City of Cherr vy ille (on behalf of the Division of Water Resources in accordance with Session
Law 2013-340)
Contact person and title: Larry Wright Waste Water Superintendent
Complete mailing address: 736 Tot Dellinger rd
City: Cherr vy ille State: NC Zip: 28021
Telephone number: 704) 214-1162 E-mail address: lwrightkci . ofcherryville.com
Subject: Notification of residual land application site proposal
This is to notify you that the Applicant listed above will be submitting an application to the Division of Water
Resources for the land application of residual solids to site(s) located in your county. During this review, the Division
will ensure that all federal and state regulations are enforced. Attached to this form is information regarding residuals -
generating sources and locations of the proposed land application sites. Please forward this letter and its associated
attachments to the appropriate Department within your County (i.e., Health or Environmental Health Department and
Planning Department) if applicable.
More information of the land application sites included in this application will be available at the following
Division of Water Resources Regional Office:
Name of appropriate regional office: NC DEQ Mooresville
Complete mailing address: 610 East Center Ave Suite 301
City: Mooresville State: NC Zip: 28115
Telephone number: [phone]
Expected date of application submission: 01/10/20
Should you desire to comment on this application, please do so no later than 30 calendar days following the
expected application submission date. If you have any questions or comments about this notification, or if you would like
more information, please contact the appropriate regional office at the telephone number provided above. Thank you in
advance for your attention to this matter.
Enclosures: Source Facility Summary
Land Application Site Summary
Maps
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: httyflPortal.ncdenr.org/web/wg
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer- Made in part with recycled paper P URM: UBN 06-16

o�0F w a rF,�QG
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
ft
'C LAND APPLICATION SITE CERTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information or for an electronic version of this form, visit the Land Application Unit (LAU) web site at.
http: //portal. ncdenr. org/webhvg/aps/lau
General — This certification provides detailed information of receiving sites for land application of Class B residuals (may include
water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not submit this certification for review
without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 08-11 or FORM: SDR 08-11).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Application Site Certification (FORM: LASC 08-11):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: LASC 08-11) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® For new or renewed permits, submit the requested information for all land application sites.
® For modified permits, submit the requested information for only those sites that are new, transferred or affected by the
proposed modification.
B. Land Application Site Information:
® The status of the land application site with respect to this residuals land application program must be provided in table L The
status categories and their corresponding codes are as follows:
♦ New (N) ♦ Renewed (R) ♦ Modified (M) ♦ Transferred (T) ♦ Deleted (D)
® Attach the following in accordance with each status code:
Status Code
Required Item
N
R
T
M
County Manager
Notification
W y
Land Owner
Agreement
(If applicable)
Setback Waiver
Agreement
An updated vicinity/setback map in accordance with the "Map Guidance
for Residuals Land Application Permits"
✓
✓
✓
A soils and agronomic evaluation in accordance with the "Soil Scientist
✓
Evaluation Policy"
An updated accounting of the land application site's cumulative
✓
✓
pollutant loading rates (CPLRs)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 1 of 3

Required Item
Status Code
N
R
T
M
For previously permitted sites without a soil series name indicated in the
Attachment B, submit County Soil Survey Map (or equivalent) clearly
✓
✓
✓
indicate the location of the land application site and in accordance with
the soil map requirements in the "Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy"
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Permittee relinquishing field
✓
Acknowledgement of field transfer from Land Owner (Fields may not
✓
be permitted to multiple Permittees over the same time period)
* This item may be required for land application site with a status code "M", please contact the Division if you need assistant in
determining attachment requirements.
® Crop Type should include the most likely crop types for the life of the permit (five years).
® Predominant Soils Series Name must be either the name of the soil indicated in Attachment `B" of the existing permit, or
name of the soil series as provided by the licensed soil scientist.
® Predominant Soil Mapping Unit or Representative Slope: Either the Soil Mapping Unit or the representative slope of each
site must be provided. The predominant soil -mapping unit must be consistent with the predominant soil series name. Please
note that the soil mapping units are variable between Counties, so care should be taken in properly identifying the correct
mapping unit. If a representative slope is provided, it must be determined accordingly:
® For sites previously permitted for use, but do not have an established soil mapping unit (the mapping unit provides
information on both the soil series name and the slope of the soil), the Applicant may determine the representative slope
by using the average slope provided in the County Soil Survey (or equivalent). A soil type with a slope range of 4 - 8%
would have a representative slope of 6%.
❑ New Sites to be permitted must have slopes determined as part of the soils report prepared by a licensed soil scientist.
® Acceptable methods for determining location coordinates (i.e., latitude and longitude) and their corresponding codes are as
follows:
• Address Matching (ADD) • Digital or Raw Photo Extraction (EXT)
• Aerial Photography with Ground Control (AER) • Geodetic Quality GPS Survey (GEO)
• Cadastral Survey (SUR) • LORAN-C Navigation Device (LOR)
• Conversion from Coordinate Plane (CP) • Navigation Quality GPS (GPS)
• Conversion from Township -Section -Range (TSR) • Remote Sensing (RS)
• Conversion from Universal Trans Mere (UTM) • Zip Code Centroid (ZIP)
• Map Interpretation by Digital or Manual Extraction (MAP)
C. Waterbody and Classifications Information: (new sites only)
® Use an 8.5 by 11-inch copy of the portion of a 7.5-minute USGS Topographic Map to identify the location where the
residuals program activities are planned to occur as well as the closest downslope surface waters as clearly as possible. Each
map portion must be labeled with the map name and number, the identified location, and be of clear and reproducible quality.
® Surface water body classifications information may be found at: http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/wq/�s/csu
❑ Any questions concerning the waterbody and its classification, please contact the Division's regional offices.
❑ A list of the Division's regional offices, their county coverage, and their contact information may be downloaded at:
http://portal.ncdenr.ora/web/wg/home/ro
❑ General Instructions: There are 17 river basins in North Carolina. Each basin has associated waterbodies with assigned
subbasins, location descriptions, stream index numbers and established classifications.
1. Identify the project area on a 7.5 minute USGS topographical map (an 8.5 x 11-inch sheet showing the project area
should be submitted with the permit application regardless of whether a Stream classification was completed).
2. Determine the names of all the closest down slope surface waters from the project site. For unnamed tributaries, see
Table 1: Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas. Label any unnamed tributaries as
"UT to stream name" as the waterbody name.
3. Open the link hU://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/reportsWB.htrnl. If this link does not work, open
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg//s/csu/classifications and download weekly -updated classification lists for named
waterbodies.
❑ Stream Classification Process: One of the options below may be used depending on the known initial project information.
❑ KNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select proper basin from the List all Waterbodies in Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field codes.
Basin sorted Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field codes. report. Sort hydrologically as this will
provide the proper location descriptions if multiple runs.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 2 of 3

2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ KNOWN COUNTY WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Select the proper county from the List all Waterbodies in Error! Objects cannot be created from editing field
codes. county, hydrologically report.
2. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
3. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
4. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ UNKNOWN BASIN WHERE CLOSEST DOWN SLOPE SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED
1. Use the Clickable basin map to hydrologically sorted list report.
2. Click on the approximate project location to bring up the hydrologically sorted list.
3. Locate the name of the identified waterbody (from General Directions) on the list.
4. For multiple listings of the same waterbody name in the report, select and verify the location description. The term
"source" in the description means the beginning of the waterbody segment (most upstream point).
5. Record all Basins, Stream Index Numbers and Classifications applicable to the project.
❑ Notes on index number and unnamed streams:
Unnamed Streams 15A NCAC 02B .030l(i).
❑ Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classification as that assigned
to the stream segment to which it is tributary (at the point of entry) except:
(A) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications;
(B) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or
(C) after November 1, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which are connected to Class SA waters by
approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case -by -case reclassification proceedings are conducted.
❑ The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the
basin:
Unnamed Tributaries Entering Other States or for Specific Basin Areas
Hiwassee River Basin
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr."
Little Tennesse River
Basin And Savannah
River Drainage Area
Streams entering Georgia or Tennessee shall be classified "C Tr." Such streams in the Savannah
River drainage area entering South Carolina shall be classified 'B Tr."
French Broad River
Basin
Streams entering Tennessee will be classified "B."
Watauga River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Broad River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
New River Basin
Streams entering the State of Tennessee are classified "C."
Catawba River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C."
Yadkin -Pee Dee River
Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C," and such streams entering South Carolina are
classified "C."
Lumber River Basin
Streams entering South Carolina are classified "C Sw."
Roanoke River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C." Except that all backwaters of John H. Kerr
Reservoir and the North Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or
described shall carry the classification "B," and all backwaters of Lake Gaston and the North
Carolina portion of streams tributary thereto not otherwise named or described shall carry the
classification "C and B."
Chowan River Basin
Streams entering Virginia are classified "C."
Tar -Pamlico River
Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C Sw." except the main drainage
canals to Pamlico Sound and its bays which shall be classified "SC."
Pasquotank River Basin
All drainage canals not noted in the schedule are classified "C."
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: LASC 08-11 Page 3 of 3

Applicant's name: City of CheMnAlle
Land application sites currently certified: 78.3 net acres and Total to be certified: 116.6 net acres.
I. LAND APPLICATION SITE INFORMATION (See Instruction B):
Predominant Soil
Status
Codes
Site/Field ID
Landowners
O
Lessees or Operator(s)
O
Net Acres
Count y
Crop(s) s
pO
Series Name
Mapping Unit
or Rep. Slope°
R
NC-LT-120-02
Wayne Gilbert
27.6
Lincoln
Fescue (hay)
Cecil
CeB2
R
NC-LT-120-03
Wayne Gilbert
11.0
Lincoln
Row Crops
Cecil
CeB2
D
NC-LT-124-01
Keith Beam
Keith Beam
30.0
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture)
Cecil
CeB2
D
NC-LT-124-02
Keith Beam
Keith Beam
10.1
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture)
Pacolet
PeC2
R
NC-LT-107-01
Jason Huitt
10.7
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture)
Cecil
CeB2
R
NC-LT-107-02
Jason Huitt
12.0
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture)
Cecil
CeB2
R
NC-LT-107-03
Calvin Wehunt
17.0
Lincoln
Corn(silage), Sorghum,
Cecil
CeB2
Sudex
N
NC-LT-107-04
Calvin Wehunt
10.9
Lincoln
escue (pasture) Corn(silage),
Rion
Somhum, Sudex
N
NC-LT-107-05
Calvin Wehunt
17.8
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture) Corn(silage),
Cecil
CeB2
Sorghum, Sudex
N
NC-LT-107-06
Calvin Wehunt
9.5
Lincoln
Fescue (pasture) Corn(silage),
Cecil
CeB2
Somhum, Sudex
a Status Code for land application sites are: ♦ N (New) ♦ R (Renewed) ♦ M (Modified) ♦ T (Transferred) ♦ D (Deleted)
b Soil Series Name (i.e. Appling, Cecil, etc.)
Mapping Unit must be consistent with those used in the County Soil Survey (i.e. for a 2-8% slope Cecil in Anson County the mapping unit is CeB2)
C. WATERBODY AND CLASSIFICATIONS INFORMATION (See Instruction C):
Site/Field ID
Latitude
Longitude
Location
Datum
Location Method Code
Location Accuracy
Waterbody Subbasin and
Stream Index No.
Current and Proposed
Class
NC-LT-107-04
35.4737
-81.4674
NAD 83
MAP
Second
Little Buffalo Creek
WS-111
WS-111
NC-LT-107-05
35.4717
-81.4664
NAD 83
MAP
Second
Little Buffalo Creek
WS-111
WS-111
NC-LT-107-06
35.4701
-81.4633
NAD 83
MAP
Second
Little Buffalo Creek
WS-111
WS-111

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DW Division. of Water Resources
LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
Division of Water Resources FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one on final and two co ies of the a lication and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Nan-Dischar a Permitting Unit
General — This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
1q ® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
_ AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
he undersigned landowner or his repregentative hereby
dP
,' Applicants name: e0
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply
-,;,-.".i application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in
Agreement:
Special note
Residuals Source
Lease Land Use or Intended Use of Crops (no-till/over-seed/
Site/Field ID (yes/no) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
asture
residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals wnue Inc
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
ivision's permit for the residuals land application program and
This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the D
! iall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Pagel of 3

I. STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shall not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1636
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain'a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the
land application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals
land application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If -the soil pH of the land application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of lime shall be applied to achieve a final
soil pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for
the specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of
nutrients (e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11, The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application sites) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land
application events at appropriate periods.
12, Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
' term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
RESTRICTIONS:
I. Appropriate measures must be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land
application site(s) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event, Such controls may include the
posting of signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
t` 2. Animals shall not be graced on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event. Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land
application events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-
month period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event.
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, 15A NCAC 02T .0I051h1 allows the
compliance boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance
boundary provided the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
_ (Please include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed
pliance boundary to the application package)
j A re -defined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The land application field(s) ID: is currently permitted under another
{ residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred
into the new program;
. (Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee to land apply residuals to the laud application site(s) as specified
herein.
Landowner name:
Address: 2 3
City: �` State: Zip: V Z
Phone: J'�r` a 7k0 E-mail address:- _vL . t04 VaLe,y'
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, A w �� COUNTY
1, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that b E l/L LP_ kn
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
'I h .���Nvi�ii
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of
, 20 2 C.>
Signature and seal: i
My commission expires:
; CO\3XA %�
Lessee'slOperator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail address:
I certify that I have read this. Agreement and do hereby agree to
Signing official name:
Signature:
Why
Zip:
Date:
by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Date: t, 3 ^ ZV2_v
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
`�Dlvlslon of Water Resources LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
f�
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required 'items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and
supporting documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non-Dischar a Permfttin Unit
General -- This document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .1100. Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (NORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below.
A. Land Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-16):
® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
® Prepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
® A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR TIDE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
ae undersigned landowner or his rep esentatiive hereby per}nits.
Applicant's name: 1 O JA �/ - CO�11�' _r/ —
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from the following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Special note
Lease Land Use or Residuals Source no-tilllover-seed)
Sitel�'ield ID Intended Use of Crops a tional
(yes/no) Cropping Patterns (optional) pasture)
G- L - 10 "ir 7-Al K S
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
'This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
1�t iall be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page I of 3

L STIPULATIONS:
1. The landowner or his representative shalt not enter into any additional residuals application contracts or agreements with another permitted
entity for the site(s) specified by this Agreement.
2. Should the landowner or his representative lease or otherwise permit the use of the land application site(s) to a third party, the landowner shall
be responsible to ensure that the third party agrees and complies with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3. The landowner or his representative shall adhere to the provisions of this Agreement until all of the site restrictions (under Section 11) are met.
4. Notification of cancellation of this Agreement shall be immediately forwarded to NCDENR-DWR, Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, 1636
Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
5. The Permittee must request and obtain a permit modification from the Division prior to a transfer of the land application site(s) to a new
landowner. In addition, the current landowner shall give a notice to the new landowner that gives full details of the residuals applied at the
land application site(s).
6. The Permittee has provided the landowner or his representative with information and data concerning the residuals land application program,
including an analysis of constituents of the residuals, residuals application methods, schedules for typical cropping patterns, a description of
the equipment used by the Permittee.
7. The Permittee will provide the landowner or his representative with a copy of the residuals permit prior to commencement of any residuals
land application event and a copy of the results of each soil analysis.
8. If -the soil pH of the land. application site(s) is not maintained at 6.0 or greater, sufficient amounts of time shall be applied to achieve a final
soil pH of at least 6.0, unless an agronomist provides information indicating that the pH of the soil, residuals and lime mixture is suitable for
the specified crop.
9. The landowner or his representative and the Permittee will agree on residuals application rates and schedules based on crop patterns, results of
soil samples, and the permitted application limits.
10. The landowner or his representative will provide the Permittee with information regarding the amount and analysis of other sources of
nutrients (e.g., fertilizer, unregulated animal waste, etc.) that have been applied to the land application site(s).
11. The landowner or his representative will inform the Permittee of any revisions or modifications to the intended use and cropping patterns for
the land application site(s) prior to each planting season to enable the Permittee to amend this Agreement and schedule residuals land
application events at appropriate periods.
12. Specific residuals land application area boundaries shall be clearly marked on the land application site(s) by the Permittee, the landowner, or
his representative prior to and during a residuals land application event.
13. The landowner or his representative hereby authorizes the Permittee, local officials, and State officials or their representatives to; enter and
inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the land application site(s) at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with the permit; establish monitoring facilities on or near the land application site(s) as required by the permit; copy any records
that must be kept under the terms and conditions of the permit; take necessary leachate, surface water, groundwater, or soil samples during the
term of, and 12 months after termination of, this Agreement.
t
RESTRICTIONS.
1. Appropriate measures roust be taken by the Permittee and/or the landowner or his representative to control public access to the land
application sites) during active use and for the 12-month period following a residuals land application event, Such controls may include the
posting of signs that indicate the activities being conducted at the land application site(s).
2. Animals shall not be grazed on the land application site(s) for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event, Land application
sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to prevent access during these periods after such residuals land
application events.
3. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for a 30-day period following a residuals land application event.
4. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residuals/soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for a 14-
month period following a residuals land application event.
5. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 20-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil.
6. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for a 38-month period following a residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
7. Turf grown on land where residuals are applied shall not be harvested for a 12-month period following a residuals land application event,
M. ALTERNATIVES FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS INSIDE THE COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY: (please check one)
15A NCAC 02L .0107(d) prohibits water supply wells within the compliance boundary. However, l3A NCAC 02T .OtO5(hl allows the
compliance boundary to be placed closer to the waste disposal area, such that the water supply well is situated outside of the compliance
boundary provided the groundwater standards can be met at the newly -established compliance boundary. Please mark one of the following;
❑ A re -defined compliance boundary is needed for field(s) ID:
F'-C-P'liance
include the rationale for the requested re -location of the compliance boundary and attach a map showing the newly proposed
boundary to the application package)
A -efined compliance boundary is not needed for this site.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FIELD TRANSFER: (if needed)
❑ The laird application field(s) ID: is currently permitted under another
residuals land application program; Permit Number WQ: The land owner hereby acknowledge that by signing this
agreement, he/she is requesting that the field(s) be removed from the previously permitted residuals land application program and transferred
into the new Drop -ram:
(Name of the new program)
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 2 of 3

Landown.er's Certification:
I certify that f am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application sites) and am authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application site(s) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Permittee td4and apply residuals to the land application sites) as specified
herein. �Ae
Landowner-name:l
Address: TS La
` State: N % Zip: -P R V53
City: _?��� -
Phone: 9 E-mail address:-'IDrJ+
Signature: Date:
NORTH CAROLINA, &* COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that r\ 4yi
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument. %111i 10
.�� Ex
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of
r f
Signature and seal: " m ►
I ,ij�
11. y� ■ ' e
My commission expires: 0V• ♦ '-�-;�,�
f►�O U
Lessee's/Operator's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone. -
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
State:
E-mail
Date:
Zip:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Signing official name: Lc r V'� y i �' [ '�et�r�yllU P• w
Signature:
Date:
1- 1'3 2o20
FORM: LOA 06-16 ]gage 3 of 3

State of North Carolina
I
Department of Environment and Natural Resources RDivision of Water Resources
` Division of Water Resararces LAND OWNER AGREEMENT
FORM: LOA 06-16
Please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these
instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of additional
information requested. Failure to submit all of the required items will lead to additional processing and review time for the
permit application. Unless otherwise noted the Applicant shall submit one on inal and two copies of the application and
sunnortina documentation
For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Mon -Discharge PermitUag Unit
General —`Phis document is an agreement between the Applicant and land owner(s) of residuals receiving sites for land application of
Class B residuals (may include water treatment plant or other type residuals) in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T 110 . Do not
submit this agreement for review without a corresponding application form (FORM: RLAP 06-16).
Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation listed
below. f
A. Lapd Owner Agreement (FORM: LOA 06-1.6):
Submit the completed and appropriately executed Residuals Source Certification (FORM: LASC 06-16) form. Please do not
make any unauthorized content changes to this form. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the
application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer.
dPrepare a separate agreement for each set of land application sites that are owned or operated by an entity other than the
Applicant.
[U/A copy of the completed and appropriately executed agreement must be provided to the landowner and the lessee/operator.
AGREEMENT FOR THE LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS TO PRIVATELY OWNED LAND
.ie undersigned landowner or his re
Applicant's name: 1,( + 0
hereby perm
Ckr rry ✓Y
hereinafter referred to as the Permittee, to land apply residuals from thh following facility(ies) onto the following land
application site(s) (i.e., see attached setback maps) in accordance with the stipulations and restrictions as given in this
Agreement:
Site/Field ID
Lease
Lease
band Use or
Cropping Patterns
Intended Use of Crops
Residuals Source
(optional)
Special note -
r-seedl
(no-ti pasture)
paasture}
The landowner or his representative receives, in consideration, full use of the nutrient value of the applied residuals while the
Permittee receives, in consideration, the use of the land application site(s) described above for the disposal of the residuals.
_This Agreement shall remain in effect for the length of the Division's permit for the residuals land application program and
{( call be renewed each time this permit is renewed.
j The undersigned landowner or his representative and the Permittee agree to abide with the following restrictions and
stipulations until such time as written notification, given 30 calendar days in advance, modifies or cancels this Agreement.
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 1 of 3

Landowner's Certification:
I certify that I am a deeded landowner of the above -referenced land application site(s) and aria authorized to make decisions
regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of other deeded landowners OR that I am otherwise authorized, through
a power of attorney or other legal delegation, to make decisions regarding the use of the land application site(s) on behalf of the
deeded landowners. I certify that the above -referenced land application sites) are not included in any waste disposal contract or
agreement with another municipality, contractor, or other permitted entity. Furthermore, I certify that I have read this Agreement,
understand the stipulations, restrictions, alternatives for water supply wells inside the compliance boundary, acknowledgement of
field transfer, and do hereby grant permission to the Peimittee to Iand apply residuals to the land application site(s) as specified
herein. _.e
r
Landowner name:
Address: 'Sa Al CA � Sit," !
city: / 4 State: zip:
Phone: O 2 7 --- % mail address: j f
Signature: Date: ---
NORTH CAROLINA, L."1101 COUNTY
I, the undersigned Notary Public do hereby certify that t Ai e r 14 ge
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the forgoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this the
day of 20 ` d;,
Signature and seal: W z
►'�
My commission expires: '4 _Z
Lessee's/Operator's Certification: <<CO1%�`,`,
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do hereby agree to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Lessee/operator name:
Address:
City:
Phone:
Signature:
Permittee's Certification:
I certify that I have read this Agreement and do
Signing official name:
Signature:
State:
E-mail
Zip:
Date:
to abide by the stipulations and restrictions as specified herein.
Date:
FORM: LOA 06-16 Page 3 of 3

SYNAGRO, CHERRYVILLE CLASS B PERMIT
WQ 0000430
SOIL SCIENTIST CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that soil profile evaluations were conducted on the proposed application
sites for the Cherryville WWTP project by Piedmont Environmental Associates, P.A. on
behalf of Synagro Central, LLC. The evaluations consisted of hand auger borings and
descriptions of the soils on the application sites. All hand auger borings included in this
package were either performed by me or under my direct supervision. All other work
performed for this permit application was conducted by Synagro Central, LLC.
G. Christopher Murray, L.S.S.
No. 1284
Synagro, Cherryville WWTP Project, Various Fields

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project:
Cherryville Permit (WQ 0000430)
% Slope:
4%
Site:
Calvin Wehunt
Crop:
Forage/Pasture
Field:
Field 4
Conducted By:
GC Murray
Coordinates:
35.4737 N
Date:
11/14/2019
-81.4674 W
Soil Series:
Rion
0
0
0
0
O
x
d
N
5
z o
5
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
A S S O C I AT E:, P. A.
w
w
-`a Q W
N N
c C9 cn
d y
N O
Q co U L L L L O
d
d d x Z
0 N K 7 7 7 N
5 5 � 5 6. n n 1 5
o��
veep®
• •
�
®®�
Legend.
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistencv
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
soli s

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project:
Cherryville Permit (WQ 0000430)
% Slope:
4%
Site:
Calvin Wehunt
Crop:
Forage/Pasture
Field:
Field 5
Conducted By:
GC Murray
Coordinates:
35.4717 N
Date:
11/14/2019
-81.4664 W
Soil Series:
Cecil
0
0
0
0
O
x
d
N
5
z o
5
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
A S S O C I AT E:, P. A.
w
w
-`a Q W
N N
c C9 cn
d y
N O
Q co U L L L L O
d
d d x Z
0 N K 7 7 7 N
5 5 � 5 6. n n 1 5
Ap
0-3
10YR 4/4
-
-
-
-
moist
sl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
AB
3-11
5YR 4/4
-
-
-
-
moist
scl
mod
med
gr
fr
ns
np
Bt
11-41
2.5YR 4/6
-
-
-
-
moist
cl
mod
med
sbk
fi
s
p
BC
41-48
2.5YR 4/6
-
-
-
-
moist
scl
mod
med
sbk
fi
s
p
Legend.
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistencv
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
soli s

Soil Profile Descriptions in Field Locations
Project:
Cherryville Permit (WQ 0000430)
% Slope:
3%
Site:
Calvin Wehunt
Crop:
Forage/Pasture
Field:
Field 6
Conducted By:
GC Murray
Coordinates:
35.4701 N
Date:
11/14/2019
-81.4633 W
Soil Series:
Cecil
0
0
0
0
O
x
d
N
5
z o
5
PIEDMONT
ENVIRONMENTAL
A S S O C I AT E:, P. A.
w
w
-`a Q W
N N
c C9 cn
d y
N O
Q co U L L L L O
d
d d x Z
0 N K 7 7 7 N
5 5 � 5 6. n n 1 5
Legend.
Texture
s
sand
I
loam
si
silt
sil
silt loam
c
clay
cl
clay loam
scl
sandy clay loam
sl
sandy loam
sicl
silty clay loam
Structure Grade
Structure Type
wk weak
gr
granular
m moderate
pl
platy
str strong
pr
prismatic
cpr
columnar
abk
angular blocky
sbk
subangular blocky
sg
single grained
ma
massive
Structure Size
f fine
med medium
Moist Consistencv
fr friable
vfr very friable
fi firm
vfi very firm
Seasonal High Water Table:
Depth (") Type (apparent/perched)
soli s

%
' o -�i �, A�Qi

APPLICATION MAP
Q
Cl�
■
" . qyv
�f J
■ RO ��
LEGEND
APPLICATION AREA UNSUITABLE AREA
— — — — — — PRIVATE ROAD =W WATER
�� GRAPHIC SCALE
— — — — STREAM
ONSITE HOUSE V = 660
— DRAIN 660' 0 660'
OFFSITE HOUSE
FENCE
OUTBUILDING
PROPERTY LINE
0 WELL
Q SOIL PROFILE
The compliance boundary is established either 250 ft from the residuals application area or 50 feet within
N C-LT-1 O7
in the property boundary, whichever is closest to the application area. The review boundary is established
midway between the compliance boundary and the perimeter of the residuals application area. All
locations are approximate.
Field 3

a �
� a �
• 1' • 1 1• 1. 1 1' • • .11 • �