Private WSW-NCD986188027 International Paper Landfill No.3

•
•
•
•
August 8, 2005 z
rn
C>>
G7
r7
D.Mike Cody CO
214 Camelot Drive c
Clyde, NC 28721 ,n
-. a r-7
J u i U
a` Mr. Landon Davidson �'� /
Regional Supervisor Groundwater Section ��"�
NCDENR
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Subject: Private Water Supply Well Analytical Results for Tom and Don Jim ison Canton NC
Dear Mr. Davidson:
As per our conversation, several months ago, attached are the well testing results for the well of Tom
and Don Jimison. I do not agree with the findings of IP and their consultants. They are looking at the
test data as individual tests. When you look at the two wells, ask why such a difference.in the data you
begin to ask if the landfill is having an affect on the wells.
Would please review the attached results and let me know-what your opinion is of these findings.
Sincerely,
/6- /401.
D. Mike Cody

j f l
•
INTERNATIONAL©PAPER •
Thomas C. Richardson 6400 Poplar Avenue
Project Manager Memphis,TN 38197
• Environmental Assets& Initiatives
T 901 419 3878
•
F 901 419 3962
•'Tom.RichardsonAipaper.com
•
April 28, 2005
Mr. D. Mike Cody
214 Camelot Drive
Clyde, NC 28721
RE: Private Water Supply Well Analytical Results, Canton, NC
Dear Mr. Cody, • •
•
On January 25, 2005 water samples were collected from two private water supply wells
in Canton, North Carolina belonging to Mr. Tom Jimison and Mr. Donald James Jimison.
In accordance with our prior arrangements,,you had agreed to this sampling date and
were present to observe the sampling activities. The wells were sampled by Altamont
Environmental, Inc: (Altamont) under contract to International Paper Company. Water
samples were analyzed by Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. and Pace Laboratories for
a list of chemical constituents that you had reviewed and agreed to. The purpose of the
water quality analyses was to determine if groundwater drawn from the wells was
affected by the nearby closed landfill.
The laboratory reports of analytical results of the groundwater samples are enclosed.
Also enclosed are two tables.summarizing-the data and applicable regulatory standards
and guidelines for concentrations of the constituents in drinking water. Iron and pH were
the only constituents in the water sample from the Donald James Jimison well that-
showed results outside the limits of regulatory standards. The consultant's opinion is
that the iron and pH values are within the range of natural unimpacted groundwater in
.the area. No constituents were a detected outside the limits of regulatory standards in the
• Tom Jimison well: -
An independent third party expert, CH2M Hill, was retained by Altamont to provide data
validation of the dioxin/furan analytical report from the laboratory. Several congeners
were detected in all samples, but were determined to be the result of laboratory
• conditions as they were generally detected in higher concentrations in laboratory and
field blanks than in the well water samples. As described by CH2M Hill in their data
review report, "Both-field and laboratory blanks reflect the same detected compounds at
similar concentration levels and would indicate that the laboratory was the probable
contamination source." •
International Paper believes that the water quality data developed by this effort
demonstrate that no impact from the nearby landfill is evident. This finding also supports

Mr.D.Mike Cody April 28,2005
Page 2 of 2
the conclusions drawn by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources in their July 1994 report entitled Site Inspection, Champion Landfill
No. 3, Haywood County, Canton, NC, NCD 986 188 027, Reference No. 05629.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the data, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Tom Richardson
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Tom W. Jimison
369 Wrightsville Rd.
Canton, NC 28716
Mr. James D. Jimison
341 Wrightsville Rd.
Canton, NC 28716
Tom Ross, IP
Jim McElduff, Altamont

ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
N'E E Rf'tV G 8 ."WY;D R°O G E-0 l` C'G
50 COLLEGE STREET.ASHEVILLE,NC 28801
TEL. [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
April 28,2005
Mr.Tom Richardson
Project Manager. Remediation
International Paper
6400 Poplar Avenue
Memphis,TN 38197
Subject: Potable Well Sampling
Landfill No.3
Canton,North Carolina
Dear Mr. Richardson:
International Paper, Inc.(1P).requested assistance from Altamont Environmental, Inc. (Altamont) in
sampling two potable water wells near Canton,North Carolina in January 2005. This letter contains the
results of the sampling and associated analyses.
METHODS
Altamont met a representative of IP and Mr. Mike Cody at the homes of Tom Jimison and James Donald
Jimison on January 25, 2005. Bottles and chains-of-custody were provided to Altamont by Columbia
Analytical Services,Inc.(CAS)and Pace Analytical Services(Pace). Altamont provided instruments to
measure pH, specific conductivity,Temperature,and dissolved oxygen. The instruments were calibrated
in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions earlier on the day of sampling.
Altamont purged water from each of the well systems until water quality parameters(i.e.,ph,specific
conductivity,and dissolved oxygen stabilized to within 10 percent of the preceding measurement. At the
Tom Jimison residence.Altamont purged the system through four pump/pressure tank cycles. At the
James Donald Jimison residence,Altamont purged the system through three cycles. The attached Well
Sampling Logs include data measured in the field. A field blank was developed using deionized water
provided by CAS.
Water samples were placed in the appropriate bottles provided by the laboratories. The filled bottles
were placed on ice in coolers. As appropriate,the samples were either shipped by Federal Express to the
CAS laboratory in Jacksonville,Florida or hand delivered to Pace in Asheville,North Carolina.
The samples were analyzed for metals(Method 6020 and 7740), inorganic compounds(Method 300.0,
6010, SM 2340B,310.1, 160.1),organic compounds(Methods 415.1,405.1,410.1, SM 9223.and 1613)
by CAS. Total and Fecal Coliform samples were analyzed by Pace.
P:\IP\Correspondence\Letter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

Mr.Torn Richardson
April 28,2005
Page 2of3-
FINDINGS
The laboratory findings are presented on Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 includes the analytical data for all
parameters except dioxin. Table 2 includes the dioxin and furan analytical data. The Laboratory
Analytical Reports are attached.
IP requested that Altamont find an appropriately qualified firm to provide data validation for the dioxins
and furan results. Altamont retained CH2M Hill to provide this third party review. A Technical
Memorandum documenting these findings is attached.
The following statements provide a summary of the findings:
Table 1
All but two parameters were either not detected,or were detected at concentrations below the Title 15A,
North Carolina Administrative Code(NCAC), Subchapter 2L standards(2L Standards). The two
exceptions were iron and pH. Iron vas detected in the Don.Jimison well at 3.7 milligrams per liter
(mg/L). The 2L Standard is 0.3 mg/L. The pH measurement was 5.61.
Underlying rock in the Canton area consists of biotite gneiss of the Coweeta Group or muscovite-biotite
gneiss of the Ashe Metamorphic Suite. Both of these rock types are relatively high in iron. Locally,the
muscovite-biotite gneiss can be sulfidic("Geologic Map of North Carolina;" 1985; Dept of Natural
Resources and Community Development). When iron-rich rocks are exposed to groundwater,especially
if the iron minerals are iron sulfides such as pyrite,which is typical in this area, iron will be released into
solution. Dissolution of iron sulfide minerals also tends to lower the groundwater pH,and further
increase the dissolved iron content of the groundwater("Study and Interpretation of the Chemical
Characteristics of Natural Water;"USGS Water Supply Paper 2245; 1989).
"Geology and Ground-Water Resources of the Asheville Area North Carolina;"Ground Water Bulletin
Number 16;North Carolina Department of Water and Air Resources; April 1970 presents groundwater
quality data for a four county area adjacent to Haywood County,where Canton is located. This
document shows that the pH range for the four county area is 5.1 to 9.1 Standard Units.
Further,IP reports that Landfill No.3,which is near the Torn Jimison property, was utilized for disposal
of potentially high pH materials. Thus, if a hydraulic connection exists between the landfill and the
' Jimison property,water quality effects could be expected to include high pH,not a lower pH as shown by
the analytical results.
Table 2
Four samples were analyzed for dioxins and furans by Method 1613 (two well samples,one field blank,
and one method blank). Although each of the four contained congeners of dioxins and furans,the
method blank generally contained the largest concentrations. The dioxin congener 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro
dibenzo dioxin(TCDD)was not detected. The dioxin and furan data are summarized in Table 2. •
•
P:\IP\Correspondence\Letter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

•
Mr.Tom Richardson
April 28.2005
Page 3 of 3
CH2M Hill Technical Memorandum
The referenced memorandum states that "Both field and method blanks reflect the same detected
compounds as similar concentrations levels and would indicate that the laboratory was the probable
contamination source. According to established policy set forth in the National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Data Review the compounds detected in the blank samples would he viewed as
contamination and thus the field samples would be flagged as a "non-detect".
CONCLUSIONS
Field measurements and analytical data obtained from the four referenced samples do not indicate that
water quality in the two domestic potable wells has been adversely affected by IP Landfill No.3. All pH
measurements were within those found regionally in western North Carolina. The iron concentrations
are also within the regional range of naturally occurring concentrations. These concentrations,
particularly in the Tom Jimison well,may also be affected by localized geological conditions. With
respect to the detections of dioxin and furan congeners:the third party data validation concludes that the
contamination originated in the laboratory.
Mr. Richardson, if you have questions or need additional information,please contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
, .
Ja es S. McElduff, P.E.
Attachments: Well Sampling Logs(2)
Tables I &2
Analytical Data Sheets
Technical Memorandum-Dioxin Data Review(CH2M Hill)
•
•
• P:\IP\Correspondence\Letter-Potable Well Sampling.doc

. ALTAIIMONT ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. . •
50 COLLEGE STREET,ASHEVILLE,NC 28801
TEL [phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
Well Sampling Log
_FACILITY NAME: ,�m)teS Dt'J°L.6 J PA/STA aS. DATE: (-` -S-- , •S .Sri
LOCATION: --• SAMPLING TIME: 0 9S-'
SAMPLING PERSONNEL: Leh E ill CZ j�y, WEATHER: C;L A e r 'rcX., +O°
ER: , do r � , - //, _ _,
WELL NUMB ' 3 "t— WELL DEPTH IN FEET(VVD): f� DATE: j 'L S�`
WELL DIAMETER: WATER LEVEL IN FEET(WL): D/ /'11 DATE: " TIME: 0r) .3
TYPE OF CASING: ST E E~L LENGTH OF WATER COLUMN: , A/h FEET
MEASURING POINT: /(t) • (WD)-(WL)_(LWC)
FLUSH MOUNT��/�j TICK-UP , 1 ONE CASING VOLUME: GI AI'4U1^ GALLONS
COMM : !"oTA4LE N LL (LWC)x(WCV) i
AT' '' PcivI Lri JAI!S/ R - THREE CASING VOLUMES: 1A h�%'''' GALLONS
IA 'RCATE`.Dj,.}^.,ck.^/q-i e,criV 6 S'7kkrTl,raikCTUAL VOLUME PURGED: Rh l'.IT-d`,t?, GALLONS
WELL CASING VOLUMES(WCV)
2"=0.17 Gal/Ft 3"=0.38 Gal/Ft 4°=0.66 Gal/Ft 6"=1.5 Gal/Ft 8"=2.6 Gal/Ft 12"=5.8 Gal/Ft
PURGE METHOD: BAILER TEFLON BAILER DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:
SAMPLE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:
READING GALLONS pH UNITS SPECIFIC TEMP(C°) DISSOLVED OXIDATION COLOR AND COMMENTS
PURGED COND. OXYGEN REDUCTION TURBIDITY
(µS) (mg/L) POTENTIAL
(m V�
1 DAl'l � /8 /7712- ,,{i iJ 4 1. 1Qr:J M A
2 • 4. 5-. 2 i'/°. -7 !) j 7. . c,ti.r.v-
3 . ../ s, ( i 2;s /0. 17.8 : ct.v,v
4 �'- _` ,
5 _ . T
8 .
9
SAMPLING CONTAINER , NUMBER OF CONTAINERS REQUESTED ANALYSIS '•— .
250 ml PLASTIC
40 ml GLASS - '
1 L GLASS •
OTHER -
PROTECTIVE CASING: PAD: LOCK: VEGETATION: ACCESS: GOOD/POOR
Sampling Personnel Signature: 1 �� �c Date:
Notes: µS=micro-Siemen •
mV=millivolt �(
mg/L=milligrams per liter �1 e (tkice_arajdj °"`' i�� IS
C°=degrees Celcius ,r, 45. S'1t�/.
j Ze'
P:\Templates\Blank Forms\Well Sampling Log.xls Page 1 of 1
{

i
ALTAMONT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
1<m'•.N-.bTl_N_E E RiI4'N O i$r"H Y`) R`OLO`E•,01 L.0 o*,,Y11
50 COLLEGE STREET,ASHEVILLE,NC 28801
TEL.[phone] FAc.828.281.3351
www.altamontenvironmental.com
• Well Sampling Log
II FACILITY NAME: '+—'r 6 DATE: / -C%J --$
LOCATION: -ram J ol'J /< S'1 _r
�1'�/S -�9`�Ce SAMPLING TIME: 0 �'13
SAMPLING PERSONNEL: WEATHER: C.(e A.✓ 1 h)f/) a'C)X. j-C1 r
WELL NUMBER: LF3 00/-`�y '
�'V WELL DEPTH IN FEET(WD): * DATE: /'"-Z(-S-
WELL DIAMETER: WATER LEVEL IN FEET(WL): / DATE: " TIME:d,Z3
TYPE OF CASING: S TE t L LENGTH OF WATER COLUMN:G'i'Ii\ FEET
MEASURING POINT: NA (WD)-(WL)=(LWC)
FLUSH MOUNT/STICK-UP ONE CASING VOLUME: l%"t k`i W1 v" GALLONS
COMMENTS: P)7418Gz kie?L, A'r (LWC)x(WCV)
;Or-i Ji,."'1 10•c,J /cCS1/)CAI£,e. THREE CASING VOLUMES: I//1k/'Ut-'\ GALLONS
phTH//i /)1ALL /'coPI //d 1 t ACTUAL VOLUME PURGED:GOV-sinp GALLONS
WELL CASING VOLUMES(WCV)
2"=0.17 Gal/Ft 3"=0.38 Gal/Ft 4"=0.66 Gal/Ft 6"=1.5 Gal/Ft 8"=2.6 Gal/Ft 12"=5.8 Gal/Ft
PURGE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:
SAMPLE METHOD: BAILER-TEFLON BAILER-DISP. DEDICATED PUMP WHALE PUMP GRUNDFOS OTHER:
READING GALLONS pH UNITS SPECIFIC TEMP(C°) DISSOLVED OXIDATION COLOR AND COMMENTS
PURGED COND. OXYGEN REDUCTION TURBIDITY.
(PS) (mg/L) POTENTIAL
(mV)
1 PNi>> '7``''6 efl. O //• # bN� l�l CI e m
2 I' '1. 9/ 5'-9, o //, 1- 9� ►,/17'JL a3 6',f,,� T o, 7 If 5� 4.7, / clear' //
-r4 v 6.4-2 5-7,3 i/-4 H.c- 0cle, .)-
5 --__
8
9 _
-
SAMPLING CONTAINER NUMBER OF CONTAINERS REQUESTED ANALYSIS
250 m1 PLASTIC
40 m1 GLASS -
? 1 L GLASS
OTHER
PROTECTIVE CASING: PAD: LOCK: VEGETATION: ACCESS: GOOD/POOR
Sampling Personnel Signatui . /it Initif l/9,e,..., Date:. /— LS
Notes: . µS=micro-Siemen .
mV=millivolt
mg/L=milligrams per liter -X de)! � . (ACC.cr -j74
C°=degrees Celcius
ca,42 ) ./N- Pee44. 043; iS S
/bz tie)
P:\Templates\Blank Forms\Well Sampling Log.xls Page 1 of 1

Table 1
International Paper
Miscellaneous Results
Potable Well Samples
Canton, North Carolina
Parameter NC 2L Standard Well 1 Tom Jimison Well 2 Don Jimison CAS/Pace
(mg/L)1 (LF3-001-Pt) Qualifier (LF3-006-PW) Qualifiers Field Blank Qualifierz Reporting Limit Units Method
Arsenic 0.05 <0.00050 U 0.00043 B 0.00036 B 0.00050 mg/I 6020
Barium 2 0.0091 0.0054 0.000095 B 0.0020 mg/I 6020
Cadmium 0.005 <0.0005 U <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 mg/I 6020
Chromium 0.05 0.00036 B 0.00048 _ B 0.00027 B 0.0020 mg/I 6020
Copper 1.3 0.0068 0.00047 B <0.0020 U 0.0020 mg/I 6020
Iron 0.3 0.016 3.7 <0.10 U 0.10 mg/I 6010
Lead 0.015 0.0041 0.00040 B 0.00033 B 0.0010 mg/I 6020
Manganese 0.05 0.0043 0.039 0.000035 B 0.0010 mg/I 6020
Mercury 0.0011 0.00033 B <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 mg/I 7740
Selenium 0.05 <0.0020 U <0.0020 U <0.0020 U 0.0020 mg/I 6020
Silver 0.018 <0.0005 U <0.00050 U <0.00050 U 0.00050 mg/I 6020
Zinc 2.1 0.026 0.0025 B 0.0015 B 0.010 mg/I 6020
Calcium NA 1.5 6.2 <0.50 U 0.5 mg/I 6010 `
Chloride 250 0.60 1.1 <0.2 U 0.2 mg/I 300.0
Potassium NS <2.0 U 2.6 <2.0 U 2.0 mg/I 6010
Sodium 160 1.5 5.8 <0.50 U 0.5 mg/I 6010
Sulfate 250 2.1 12 <0.4 U 0.4 mg/I 300.0
Nitrate 10 0.14 J <0.2 U <0.2 U 0.2 mg/I 300.0
Hardness NS 8.9 25 <1.7 U 1.7 mg/I SM 2340B
Alkalinity NS 7.0 27 <5 U 5 mg/I 310.1
TDS 500 28.0 83 <10 U 10 mg/I 160.1
TOC NS <1 U <1 U <1 U 1 mg/I 415.1
BOD NS <4 U <4 U <4 U 4 mg/I 405.1
COD NS 3.9 J 2.2 J 2.6 J 5 mg/I 410.2
Fecal Coliform(Pace Analytical) NS <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 SM 9223
Total Coliform(Pace Analytical) NS 1.1 <1.1 <1.1 SM 9223
Laboratory pH 6.5-8.5 6.42 5.61 NA S.U.
Field pH 6.5-8.5 6.42 5.61 NA S.U.
Specific conductance NS 51.3 132.8 NA pS
Notes:
1. Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code(NCAC),Subchapter 2L Standard.
2."NS"means no 2L Standard(for Sodium or Total Dissolved Solids). Standards are from xx and xx,respectively.
3.US EPA"Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund;Volume 1"; December 1989 states that"if there is reason to believe that the chemcial is present in a sample at a concentration below the
sample quantitiation limit,use one-half of the sample quantitiation limit as a proxy concentrations. The sample quantitiation limit value itself can be used if there is reason to believe the
concentarion is closer to it than to one-half the sample quantitiation limit" Also,the guidance suggests that if site-specific information does not indicate that a chemical is likely to be present in
a sample,zero may be substituted in place of the sample quantitiation limit Consequently,three cases are presented in this table for each of the US EPA and WHO TEFs.
4.2L Standard for Dioxin is calculated for total TEF,not for individual congeners.
5."NA"means Not Analyzed
6."pS"means microsiemens
7.Units are micrograms per liter unless otherwise noted. "S.U."means Standard Units.
8.Coliform results are shown as"Most Probable Number"per 100 milliliters
9.Due to extremely short hold times, US EPA recommends that pH measurements be conducted in the field. As shown,lab and field measurements were the same.
Table 1
April 28,2005

Table 2
International Paper
Dioxin/Furan Results
Potable Well Samples
Canton,North Carolina
Detect/on Aqueous NCAC 2L
• Individual Congeners Result' Limit Standards
Reporting Standard
. Limit
• Well 1 Tom Jimison(LF3-001-PW)
2,3,7.8-TCDD < 0.338 0.338 U 10 0.22
'1.2,3,7,8-PeCDD < 0.439 0.439 U 50 NE
1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD < 0.318 0.318 U 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD < 0.387 0.387 U 50 NE
,1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 0.354 0.354' U 50 NE
1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDD 5.983 0.412 BJ 50 NE
OCDD 73.807 0.575 BJ 100 NE
.2,3,7,8•TCDF < 0.507 0.507 U 10 NE
,1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF < 0.245 0.245 U 50 NE
'2,3.4,7,8-PeCDF < 0.227 0.227 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.795 0.162 J 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.177 • 0.177 U 50 NE
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF < 0.209 0.209 U 50 NE
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.188 0.186 U 50 NE
,1,2,3,4,6.7,8-HpCDF 0.885 0.306 BJK 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7.8,9-HpCDF < 0.415 0.415 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.337 0.337 BJ 100 NE
Well 2 Don Jimison(LF3-006-PW)
2.3,7,8-TCDD < 0.285 0.285 U 10 0.22
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD < 0.297 0.297 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD < 0.285 0.265 U 50 NE
1,2,3,8,7,8-HxCDD < 0.321 0.321 U 50 - NE
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 0.294 0.294 U 50 NE
'1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 6.289 0.522 BJ 50 NE
OCDD 69.053 0.577 BJ 100 NE
2,3.7,8-TCDF < 0.378 0.378 U 10 NE
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF < 0.162 0.162 U 50 NE
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF < 0.150 0.150 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF - < 0.160 0.180 U 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.170 0.170 U 50 NE
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF < 0.195 0.195 U 50 NE
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.185 0.185 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,6,7,8•HpCDF 1.008 0.236 BJ 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF < 0.314 0.314 U 50 .NE
OCDF 4.171 0.299 BJ 100 NE
Field Blank
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 0.353 0.353 U 10 0.22
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD < 0.419 0.419 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD < 0.416 0.416 U 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD < 0.529 0.529 U 50 NE
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 0.473 0.473 U 50 NE
11,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDD 6.895 0.612 BJ 50 NE
'OCDD 85.718 0.702 BJ 100 NE
2,3,7,8-TCDF < 0.552 0.552 U 10 NE
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF < 0.216 0.218 U 50 NE
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF < 0.212 0.212 U 50 NE
•1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.930 0.170 JK 50 NE
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.181 ' 0.181 U 50 NE
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF < 0.216 • 0.216 U 50 NE
2;3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.194 0.194 U 50 NE
i1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.195 0.284 BJ 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF < 0.376 0.376 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.907 0.404 BJ 100 NE
Method Blank
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 0.596 0.596 U 10 0.22
!1,2,3,7,8•PeCDD < 0.584 0.584 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD < 0.547 0.547 U 50 NE
;1,2,3,8,7,8-HxCDD < 0.712 0.712 U 50 NE
11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 0.834 0.834 U 50 NE
;1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 5.054 0.763 J 50 NE
IOCDD 50.092 0.994 J 100 NE
:2,3,7,8-TCDF < 0.382 0.382 U 10 NE
11,2,3,7.8-PeCDF < 0.421 0.421 U 50 NE
.2.3,4,7,8-PeCDF < 0.379 0.379 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF < 0.326 0.328 U 50 NE
I1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.345 0.345 U 50 ' NE
,1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF < 0.391 0.391 U 50 NE
12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF < 0.370 0.370 U 50 NE
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1.315 0.888 JK 50 NE
I1,2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF < 0.888 0.888 U 50 NE
OCDF 4.542 1.047 J 100 NE
Notes:
1.Units are picograms per liter.
2.Laboratory Qualifiers:"B"means enalyte found in the associated blank as well as the sample;"J"indicates
an estimated value used when the analyte concentration Is below the method reporting limit and above the
3.Title 15A,North Carolina Administrative Code(NCAC),Subchapter 2L Standard
Table 2Dioxin Congeners April 28,2005

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL
International Paper — Dioxin Data Review •
TO: Jim McElduff
COPIES:
Kevin Sanders/GNV
FROM: Mark Stinnett/GNV
DATE: March 22,2005
Process and background
The purpose of the technical memorandum(TM)is to present the review of the dioxin data for
samples collected at International Paper.The review was performed on the analytical results from
water samples collected on January 25,2005.
These water samples were submitted to Columbia Analytical Services Laboratories(CAS),Inc.,in
Jacksonville,Florida for the following analyses:Metals by SW-846 Method 6010B and 6020,
Mercury by SW-846 Method 7470,Dioxins by method 1613B,and nine general chemistry
parameters.The dioxin analytical fraction was sub-contracted to the CAS laboratory located in
Houston,Texas.
Level II Review Results
The following list represents the QA/QC measurements that were reviewed for the dioxin analytical
data set.
• Holding Times: The holding times for the dioxins were evaluated according to method
requirements. The laboratory data reflects that all samples were extracted and analyzed within
the established holding times.No analytical values were affected due to holding time violations.
• Blank samples: One method blank and field blank were analyzed for this event.Both blank
samples indicated the presence of target compounds in their matrix.The same compounds were
detected in the two native field sample at similar concentrations.This may be indicatative of
improper handling techniques,either in the field and/or in the laboratory resulting in
contamination of the native field samples. See Table 1-1 below for these compounds and the
comparison with the aforementioned blanks.
• Labeled compound Recoveries: All labeled compound recoveries were within the laboratories
established control limits.These recoveries indicated no potential matrix interferences affecting
the final analytical concentrations of these samples.
• Lab Control Sample(LCS):All LCS recoveries were within acceptance criteria.These results
indicate that the analytical process within the laboratory were under control at the time of native
sample analyses.
• Toxicity Equivalence Factors(TEF) :The TEF is a dioxin toxic equivalent,calculated by
looking at all toxic dioxins and furans and measuring them in terms of the most toxic form of
dioxin,2378-TCDD.The CAS laboratory's Form 3 used to summarize the TEF is taken directly
the EPA reference material.The equivalence factors are the same as listed in Update to
EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989.

i 1
� r
Table 1-1(concentration units are pg/L)
1 �r"getACompy0l4 id F �Fieid Blank;'Method Blanli' 'I 13001 >P i * F3oo6-1'WT
r v �6.4,E 3 .ti uF kt ki t i`�r 64ox a x :s x a fi?fi i v t .;.SZ`4 -�..t i • A--- -t,., atit tee
.r......._ c.. F.,.,,..._.� x,__.�..�_„,�,._.c,...:r ..��..�. ,���!hc_k.`.m�'s t-u....cb:t'-_.,sa,,!-�'t...r,S��;s-��-.,�:a:t"�t.�u.-._tri`:
1234678-HpCDD 6.895 5.054 5.963 6.289
OCDD 85.718 50.092 73.607 69.053
12334678-HpCDF 1.195 1.315 0.885 1.008
OCDF 4.907 4.542 4.337 4.171
123478-HxCDF 0.930 ND 0.795 ND
Conclusion
The analytical methods applied to this data set were in control by the laboratory at the time of
analysis.No field duplicate sample or matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate'samples were analyzed
with this sample group.Spike labeled compound recoveries results indicate that the specific sample
matrix did not interfere with the analytical process or the final numerical result.Blank samples show
evidence of low level contamination.Both field and method blanks reflect the same detected
compounds at similar concentration levels and would indicate that the laboratory was the probable
contamination source.According to established policy set forth in the National Functional Guidelines
for Organic Data Review the compounds detected in the blank samples would be viewed as
contamination and thus the field samples would be flagged as a"non-detect".Overall,the data quality
is within control limit and can be used in the project decision-making process.

rA 'c err •
arch 7,zoos •
8540 Baycenter Road Jacksonville,Florida 32256 [phone]ph Analytical
[phone] fax Services'
An Employee-Owned Company
March 01,2005 Service Request No: J0500343
Tom Richardson
International Paper
•
6400 Poplar Ave
Memphis, TN 38197
RE: LF#2 Private Wells
Dear Tom:
Enclosed are the results of the samples) submitted to our laboratory on January 26, 2005. For
your reference,these analyses have been assigned our service request number J0500343.
All analyses were performed according to our laboratory's quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report.
All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items
submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the
report.
Please call if you have any questions. My extension is 289. You may also contact me via email
at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
of
Tom Kissinger
Project Manager
Pagelof ,5
Laboratory Manager: Greg Jordan
Quality Assurance Officer:Martha Montero
CAS Jacksonville is NELAC-accredited by the State of Florida, #E82502 valid through 6/30/05.
Other state accreditations include: Arkansas, #88-0600 valid through 1/12/06; Georgia, #904
valid through 6/30/05;Louisiana, #02086 valid through 6/30/05;North Carolina, #527 valid
through 12/31/05; and South Carolina, #96021 valid through 6/30/05. 1
•
NELAP Accredited
AGIL Seal of Excellence Awards •.•,

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Client: International Paper Service Request No.: J0500343
Project: LF#2 Private Wells Date Received: 1/26/05
Sample Matrix: water
CASE NARRATIVE
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.
(CAS). This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables,including results of
QC samples analyzed from this delivery group. When appropriate to the procedure,.method blank results have been
reported with each analytical test. Analytical procedures performed by the lab are validated in accordance with
NELAC standards. Parameters that are included in the NELAC Fields of Testing but are not included in the lab's
NELAC accreditation are identified in the discussion of each analytical procedure.
Sample Receipt
3 water samples were received for analysis at Columbia Analytical Services on 1/26/05. The following
discrepancies were noted upon initial sample inspection. The exceptions are also noted on the cooler receipt and
preservation form included in this data package.The samples were received in good condition and consistent with
the accompanying chain of custody form. Samples are refrigerated at 4±2°C upon receipt at the lab except for
aqueous samples designated for metals analyses,which were stored at room temperature.
Metals by ICP-OES/Metals by ICP-MS
Batch QC Notes and Discussion
Quality control samples for some parameters(i.e.,Dup/Spike or MS/DMS samples)were performed using samples
from another sample delivery group(SDG). The frequency requirement for quality control sample analysis was
consistent with the project's requirements. Matrix specific quality control results have no bearing on sample data
from a different matrix or location. Therefore,control of the batch has been evaluated using the method blank and
the laboratory control sample.
General Chemistry Parameters
No problems were observed with this delivery group.
Subcontracted Analytical Parameters
Dioxin analyses sub-contracted to Columbia Analytical Services Houston TX.
.i -
C
:::
by I C^�"-cY/. tr—____-.1)ate / / °. 2

Data Qualifiers
Inorganic Data
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
Z Too many colonies were present(TNTC). The numeric value represents the filtration volume.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
Metals Data
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative. •
B The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
E The reported value is estimated because of the presence of matrix interference.
M The duplicate injection precision was not met.
N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.
S The result was determined by Method of Standard Additions(MSA).
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits,while sample absorbance is less than
50%of spike absorbance.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than.0.995..
Organic Data
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
A The tentatively identified compound is a suspected aldol-condensation product.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques,pattern recognition,or by comparing to
historical data.
D The reported result is from a dilution.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified,but a confirmation analysis was not
performed.
P The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria were exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40%
between the two analytical results(25%for CLP Pesticides)
U The compound was analyzed for,but was not detected("Non-detect")at or above the MRL/MDL.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
X See case narrative.
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific
F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product,but the elution pattern indicates
the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product,but the elution pattern indicates
the presence of a greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
0 The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil,but does not match the calibration standard.
Y The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the
correct carbon range,but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard:
Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
3

Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project: LF#2 Private Wells/
SAMPLE CROSS-REFERENCE
SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID DATE TIME
J0500343-001 LF3001 PW 01/25/05 0923
J0500343-002 LF3006 PW 01/25/05 0953
J0500343-003 Field Blank 01/25/05 1000
5

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
• Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells • Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-001 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0091
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 1.5
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00036 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0068
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 8.9
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 0.16
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0041
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0043
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 0.00033 B
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 1.5
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.026
• r
6

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
•
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER
l
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3006 PW Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-002 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00043 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0054
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 6.2
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0, 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00048 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00047 B
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B . 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 25
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 • 3.7
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00040 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.039
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 • 1/28/05 1/31/2005 2.6
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 5.8
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0025 B
,
I

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
•
Analytical Report
Client:' International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received: 1/26/05
Matrix: WATER -
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: Field Blank Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-003 Basis:NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00036 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000095 B
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0,50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00027 B
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 lJ
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00033 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000035 B
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0015 B
8

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
Analytical Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: NA
Project Number: Date Received: NA
Matrix: WATER
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: Method Blank Unit:mg/L(ppm)
Lab Code: J0500343-MBW Basis: NA
Test Notes:
Prep Analysis Dilution Date Date Result
Analyte Method Method MRL MDL Factor Extracted Analyzed Results Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00017 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00037 B
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00009 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.023 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 0.090 B
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00008 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00073 B'
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00025 1.0 1/28/05 12/2/2005 U
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 0.22 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 0.014 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00003 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.00026 B
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.00002 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.000031 B
Mercury METHOD 7470 0.00050 0.00001 1.0 1/31/05 1/31/2005 U
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 0.96 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.00073 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 U
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.00013 1.0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 11
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 0.033 1.0 1/28/05 1/31/2005 U
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.00073 1,0 1/28/05 2/2/2005 0.0019 B
9

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells ' Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters _
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code : J0500343-001 Basis : NA
Test Notes :
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 7.0
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day) mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 3.9 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 0.60
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 08:41 0.14 J
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 28.0
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 2.1
•
Report By:Dlashbrook 10

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3006 PW •
Lab Code : J0500343-002 Basis : NA
Test Notes :
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 27
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 2.2 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 1.1
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 08:58 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 83
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 12
•
Report By:Dlashbrook 11

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343 -
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected: 01/25/05
Project Number: NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix: WATER
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name: Field Blank
Lab Code : J0500343-003 Basis : NA
Test Notes :
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 U
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 2.6 J
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 09:15 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 - 1 01/27/05 07:00 U
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
•
12
Report By:Dlashbrook

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Analytical Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : NA
Project Number : NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER
Inorganic Parameters ,
1
Sample Name : Method Blank
Lab Code : J0500343-MB Basis : NA
Test Notes : .
Analysis Dilution Date/Time Result
Analyte Units Method MRL MDL Factor Analyzed Result Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 5 1.9 1 02/08/05 09:30 U
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day)mg/L(ppm) 405.1 4 0.88 1 01/26/05 18:15 U
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 0.35 1 02/01/05 12:45 U
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 5 1.5 1 01/31/05 09:00 U
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.1 ' 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.2 0.04 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 10 4.7 1 01/27/05 07:00 U
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 0.4 0.18 1 01/27/05 07:34 U
7
•
13
Report By:Dlashbrook

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received:1/26/05
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted:1/28/05
Date Analyzed: 1/31/2005
Matrix Spike Summary
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit: mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-001 S Basis: NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Spiked Recovery
Prep Analysis Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Level Results Results Recovery Limits Notes
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 20.0 1.52 22.0 102 75-125
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B . 1.7 91.1 8.94 102 102 75-125
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 2.00 0.158 2.08 96 75-125
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 50.0 U 52.6 105 75-125
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 10.0 1.54 11.9 104 75-125
•
14

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:1/25/05
Project Number: Date Received:1/26/05
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted:1/28/05
Date Analyzed:1/31/2005
Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Summary
TOTAL METALS
Sample Name: LF3001 PW Unit:mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-001 S J0500343-001 SD Basis:NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Spiked Spiked Relative Difference
Prep Analysis Sample Duplicate Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Results Results Difference Limits Notes
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 22.0 21.1 4.2 20
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 102 98.1 3.9 20
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 2.08 2.02 2.9 20
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 52.6 50.2 4.7 20
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 11.9 11.4 4.3 20
•
•
15

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request:J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected:NA
Project Number: Date Received:NA
Matrix: WATER Date Extracted:1/28/05
i Date Analyzed:2/2/2005
Laboratory Control Sample Summary •
TOTAL METALS
--
Sample Name: Laboratory Control Sample Unit:mg/L
Lab Code: J0500343-LCSW Basis:NA
Test Notes:
CAS Percent
Recovery
Prep Analysis True Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Method Method MRL Value Results Recovery Limits Notes
Arsenic EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0.0461 92 80-120
Barium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0508 102 80-120
Cadmium EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0.0445 89 80-120
Calcium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 20.0 20.0 100 80-120
Chromium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0492 98 80-120
Copper EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0478 96 80-120
Hardness EPA 3010A SM2340B 1.7 91.1 90.9 100 80-120
Iron EPA 3010A 6010B 0.10 2.00 1.90 95 80-120
Lead EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.0500 0.0494 99 80-120
Manganese EPA 3020A 6020 0.0010 0.0500 0.0490 98 80-120
Mercury METHOD ( 7470 0.00050 0.00500 0.00488 98 80-120
Potassium EPA 3010A 6010B 2.0 50.0 50.5 • 101 80-120
Selenium EPA 3020A 6020 0.0020 0.0500 0.0477 95 80-120
Silver EPA 3020A 6020 0.00050 0.0500 0,0478 96 80-120
Sodium EPA 3010A 6010B 0.50 10.0 10.2 102 80-120
Zinc EPA 3020A 6020 0.010 0.100 0.102 102 80-120
16

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA •
Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix: WATER Date Extracted : NA
Date Analyzed : 02/01/05
Duplicate Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code : J0500343-001DUP Basis: NA
Test Notes :
Duplicate Relative
Analysis Sample Sample Percent Result
Analyte Units Method MRL Result Result Average Difference Notes
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1
•
17
Report By:Dlashbrook

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : 01/25/05
Project Number : NA Date Received : 01/26/05
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted : NA
Date Analyzed : 02/01/05
Matrix Spike Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : LF3001 PW
Lab Code : J0500343-001MS Basis : NA
Test Notes :
CAS
Percent
Spiked Recovery
Analysis Spike Sample Sample Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method MRL Level Result Result Recovery Limits Notes
Carbon,Total Organic mg/L(ppm) 415.1 1 20 U 18 88 75-125
18
Report By:Dlashbrook

t,VLUMV11s1A ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client: International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name : LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : NA
Project Number: NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted: NA
Date Analyzed : 01/26-02/08/05
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : Laboratory Control Sample Basis : NA
Lab Code : J0500343-LCS
Test Notes :
' CAS
Percent
Recovery
Analysis Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method True Value Result Recovery Limits Notes
Alkalinity as CaCO3,Total mg/L(ppm) 310.1 250 251 100 85-115
Biochemical Oxygen Demand(5-day) mg/L(ppm) 405.1 198 204 103 85-115
Carbon,Total Organic ' mg/L(ppm) 415.1 50 45.6 91 90-110
Chemical Oxygen Demand mg/L(ppm) 410.2 85.8 92.0 107 85-115
Chloride mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 6.62 95 90-110
Nitrate as Nitrogen mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 6.92 99 90-110
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 300 300 99 85-115
Sulfate mg/L(ppm) 300.0 7.00 7.05 101 90-110
•
19
Report By:Dlashbrook

COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
QA/QC Report
Client : International Paper Service Request: J0500343
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells Date Collected : NA
Project Number : NA Date Received : NA
Sample Matrix : WATER Date Extracted : NA
Date Analyzed : 01/27/05
Laboratory Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Sample Name : Laboratory Control Sample Basis : NA
Lab Code : J0500343-LLCS
Test Notes :
CAS
Percent
Recovery
Analysis Percent Acceptance Result
Analyte Units Method True Value Result Recovery Limits Notes
Solids,Total Dissolved(TDS) mg/L(ppm) 160.1 30 35.3 118 50-150
20
Report By:Dlashbrook

Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Cooler Receipt and Preservation Form Client: \ 9 •Service Request# -5 `f
3
Project: Carksi -
Cooler received on and opened on 16101a;) by
COURIER: CAS U S FEDEX DHL CLIENT Tracking#
1 Were custody seals on outside of cooler? es M No N/A
2 Were seals intact, signed and dated? - e r No N/A
3 Were custody papers properly filled out? MI No N/A
4 Temperature of cooler(s)upon receipt (Should be 4+/-2 degrees C) •0
5 Correct Temperature? - es No N/A
6 Were Ice or Ice Packs present Yes No N/A
7 Did all bottles arrive in good condition(unbroken, etc....)? Cat) No N/A
8 Were all bottle labels complete (sample ID,preservation, etc....)? No N/A
9 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? f16-/ No N/A
10 Were the correct bottles used for the tests indicated? 4W111 No N/A
1 1 Were all of the preserved bottles received with the appropriate preservative? Yes No N/A
HNO3 pH<2 H2SO4 pH<2 ZnAc2/NaOH pH>9 NaOH pH>12 HC1 pH<2
Preservative additions noted below
12 Were all samples received within analysis holding times? al No N/A
13 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles?If present,note below Yes No N/A
14 Where did the bottles originate? liggibClient
Manuf. Lot#or CAS
Sample ID Reagent Chem ID ml added Inititials
•
Additional comments and/or explanation of all discrepancies noted above:
Client approval to run samples if discrepancies noted: Date31

SR I!: J 4B Date: Initials: 11�3v
Note that pH is checked and meets the required pH c ilerion listed in the column heading unless otherwise noted on cooler receipt form.
Bottle Code
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
40mL 40mL 40mL 40m1 125mL125mL 125mL 125mL 250mL 250mL 250mL 250mL 250mL 250mL 250mL 500mL 500mL 500mL 1L 1L 1L 1L 1L 2oz 4oz 8oz 16oz 5g 100mL Misc.
Container G G G GPPPPP P P P P G G P P P P P G G G G G G G ENC P Misc.
Sodium
z Sodium
Pres �;} HCI ndosuHara H2S041i� HCI H2SO4 HNO3 H2SO4 HNO3 NaOH 1e NaOH' HNO3 H2SO4 HNO3. i.-HNO3 HCI H2SO4' 7, i' mo.mNe
Req.pH ►7JA• <2 ;::N/A4c:: <2 .NfA; <2 <2 <2 ..N/A't <2 <2 >9 >12 -•N/A <2 1411Ai:<2<2 NJ/A <2N/A, <2 <2 N1A WA'P11/1 N/A tdAt. ,41/A17;.PUA
Sample# - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-001
-003 •---�_1 j (
-004
-005
-006
-007
-008
-009
-010
-011
-012
-013
-014
-015
-016
-017
-018
-019 _
-020
-021
-022
-023
-024
-025
-026
-027
-028
-029
-030
-031
-032
-033
-034
•
-035
-036
-037
N -038 —
-039
-040

Columbia
,� Analytical CHAIN OF CUSTODY/LABORATORY ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM S
Services 1 u ��
A^Empbo yv -0wned nCo.pany 8540 Baycenter Rd.•Jacksonville,FL 32256•[phone].800-695-7222 x06•FAX[phone] PAGE t OF
www.caslab.com
Project Name 3 Project Number
1..c A Ve-wiviE-N.4 cA,A,c Z,o5s .tZ . ANALYSIS REQUESTED(Include Method Number and
Project Manager Report CC
,� "`��� ���� VeW PRESERVATIVE
Company/Address
Preservative Key
�j Q ScC.CO-�C. ., ¢' 0. NONE
[' 1. HCL
K n\u M L tsuo 1 1 F 3. H2S84
z 4. NaOH
0 5. Zn.Acetate
U- 6. McOH
Phone FAX# cc e- 7. NaHSOq
• : Z at-• 5d 33c% 3- ° O O� 8. Other
Sampl: s Signet Sampl is Printed Name D ,g J 1— ^
�. t {Lq z (�i REMARKS/
ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION
SAMPLING
CLIENT SAMPLE ID LAB ID DATE TIME MATRIX
L-70oo6V I23-b55t-A Ov4 A t. X c A " .
. c-1C_.SJ 1.vPc 4V_ 1-2S-t6w_oo o%1 7. n_ n X
•
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/COMMENTS TURNAROUND REQUIREMENTS REPORT REQUIREMENTS INVOICE INFORMATION
RUSH(SURCHARGES APPLY) _I.Results Only
STANDARD _II.Results+OC Summaries POp
- (LCS,DUP,MS/MSD as required)
REQUESTED FAX DATE
III.Results+OC and Calbmtion BILLTO:
Summaries kAJQ\)19/7.---
REQUESTED REPORT DATE IV.Data Validation Report with Raw Data '
See QAPP V.V.Speicalized Forms/Custom Report
SAMPLE RECEIPT: CONDITION/COOLER TEMP: CUSTODY SEALS: Y N Edata Yes _No
RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY RELINQUISHED BY RECEIVED BY
Is-.
4)
Si nature Nilt
9 ^'�� ` ,rk.1`', Signature Signature Signature
1 Signature
Printed Na `� Printed Name Printed Name Printed NameF� ^ �� �Y ���1 �' Printed Name
1",�"I{• FII�(1Q Firm Firm Firm Firm
Date/me y D te/fi��a,J� R� Date/Time Dale/me Date/me Date/Time
1—ZS-off I I::CCU �--.G.10`��
Distribution:White-Return to Originator,Yellow-Lab Copy;Pink-Retained by Client SCOC-1000-07

L.:"
Columbia Columbia Analytical Services
_r��Analytical 8540 Baycenter Road
Servicesinc. Jacksonville,FL 32256
Tel [phone]
An Employee-Owned Company Fax [phone]
Appendix A
Subcontracted Analytical Results
24

••
AColumnalybiatical
10655 Richmond Avenue Suite 130A Houston,Texas 77042A
[phone] ph [phone] fax Services
An Employee-Owned Company
February 25, 2005
r-
Ms. Mandy Sullivan
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
• 8540 Baycenter Road
Jacksonville,FL 32256
•
CAS/Houston SR: J0500343 .
Project: IP-LF#2 Private Wells
•
•
Dear Mandy,
Enclosed please find the analytical results for the environmental
samples we received on 01/27/05. We tested these samples by
Method 1613B, as requested.
Our certifications include: FL/NELAP-E87611
All testing conforms to NELAP requirements. Results are to be
considered in their entirety. Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. is
not responsible for use of less than the complete report.
Your report contains v)ry pages.
Sincerely,
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES,INC.
Jane Freemyer
Senior Chemist: Projects and Quality Assurance
713-266-1599
[e-mail]
•
4 II • 'c; • 25
. NELAP Accredited 1 ACIL Seal of Excellence Award

44„.
Lsksomyai
Services
An Employee-Owned Company
•
•
Dioxin/Furan
•
•
Analytical Report
•
10655 Richmond Avenue, Suite 130-A,Houston,TX 77042
Phone[phone] Fax[phone]
www.caslab.com
26
2

Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. —Houston, TX
_ Case Narrative—Dioxins/Furans
Laboratory SDG No.: J0500343 Date: 02/25/05
Method/Compound List: 1613B PCDD_PCDF Project Chemist: Jane Freemyer
Project No.:J0500343
Project Name: IP LF#2 Private Wells
Batch Number(s)/Matrix:EB20038/Aqueous
Data Review Criteria Yes No NA' CN#2
TEST RESULTS
1)Were samples extracted and analyzed within holding times? ® ❑ ❑
2)Were reported results within calibration range? ® ❑ C
3)Were all calculations verified? ® ❑ a
4)Were all sample identifications verified? ® ❑ CI
5)Were sample detection limits reported for all analytes not detected? ® ❑ ❑
6)Were all manual integrations verified? ® ❑ 0
7)Were soil results reported on a dry weight basis?Tissue results on a wet-weight basis? ® ❑ ❑
•
8)Was approximately I Og sample(solid)or IL sample(aqueous)extracted? ® ❑ ❑
9)For the l:1 extract(with the exception of OCDD and/or OCDF),were all dilutions performed
for compounds above the linear calibration range? ❑ ❑ El
LABELED STANDARDS RECOVERY DATA
1)Were percent recoveries of labeled standards for all samples plus QC within the laboratory
acceptance criteria? ❑ ❑
2)If recoveries were outside the limits,was the S/N ratio> 10:1 in all cases? ❑ ❑
El
_ ESTIMATED MAXIMUM POSSIBLE CONCENTRATION(EMPC)
1)For ion abundance ratios outside the acceptance criteria,are the results flagged as EMPC with
a"K"flag? ® ❑ ❑ 01
2378-TCDF CONFIRMATION
1)Were all 2378-TCDF detections on the DB-5 column confirmed on the DB-225 column? ❑ E
El
•
METHOD BLANK SAMPLES
1) Were method blanks taken through the entire analytical process,including preparation and,if
applicable,cleanup procedures? ® ❑ ❑
2)Were blanks free of detected compounds? ❑ ® ❑ 02
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLES(LCSs)
1)Was each LCS prepared from a source external to the calibration standards? ® ❑ ❑
2)Were all project-required analytes included in the LCS? ❑ ❑
3)Was each LCS taken through the entire analytical procedure,including preparation and,if
applicable,cleanup procedures? ® ❑ ❑
4)Was LCS(or LCS/LCSD)associated with a batch of 20 or fewer samples? ® ❑ ❑
5)Were LCS (or LCS/LCSD)percent recoveries within the laboratory QC acceptance criteria? ® El ❑
MATRIX SPIKE(MS)and MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE(MSD)DATA
1)Were all project-required analytes included in the MS and MSD? ❑ El El
2)Were MS percent recoveries within the laboratory QC acceptance criteria? ❑ ❑
El
3)Were MSD percent recoveries and relative percent differences(RPDs)within the laboratory
QC acceptance criteria? ❑ ❑
EFI
4)If MS/MSD measurements were not taken,was the batch precision determined by
LCS/LCSD? ❑ ® ❑ 03
ANALYTICAL DUPLICATE DATA
1)Were analytical duplicates analyzed for each matrix? ❑ ❑ El
2)Were RPDs or relative standard deviations within the laboratory QC acceptance criteria? ❑ ❑ El
Reviewed by:Int. /14- Date: Z f 2575
27
R

Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. —Houston, TX
_ Case Narrative—Dioxins/Furans
Laboratory SDG No.: J0500343 Date: 02/25/05
Method/Compound List: 1613B PCDD PCDF Project Chemist: Jane Freemyer
Project No.:J0500343
Project Name: IP-LF#2 Private Wells
Batch Number(s)/Matrix: EB20038/Aqueous
Data Review Criteria Yes No NA1 CN#2
METHOD REPORTING LIMITS(MRLs)
1)Is the concentration of the lowest non-zero calibration standard in the calibration curve El El ❑
reported as the MRL?
INITIAL CALIBRATION(ICAL)
1)Were response factors(RFs)and/or relative response factors(RRFs)within the method El ❑ ❑
required QC acceptance criteria?
2)Were percent RSDs or correlation coefficient criteria met? ® ❑ ❑
• 3)Were the number of standards recommended in the method used for all analytes? ❑ ❑
4)Were all points generated between the lowest and highest standard used to calculate the El ❑ ❑
curve?
Are ICV data available for all instruments used? ® ❑ ❑
6)Has the calibration curve been verified using a NIST-traceable second source?
CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION(CCV)
1)Was the CCV analyzed at the method-required frequency? El ❑ ❑
2)Were percent differences within the method-required QC acceptance criteria? �� Q —❑-
3)Was the ICAL curve verified for each analyte of interest? El 0 0
MASS SPECTRAL TUNING
1)Was the appropriate compound for the method used for tuning? ® ❑ ❑
2)Were ion abundance data within the method-required QC acceptance criteria? E 0
RAW DATA
I)Were the raw data(e.g.,chromatograms,spectral data)reviewed by an analyst? 0 0 •
2)Were all data associated with manual integrations flagged on the quantitation reports? ® ❑ ❑
METHOD DETECTION LIMIT(MDL)STUDIES
1)Are MDL studies for each analyte in a given matrix current,on file,less than a year old? 0 ❑
DOCUMENTATION OF WATER AND REAGENTS QUALITY
1)Is documentation of the quality of water and reagents used in the analyses on file? El ❑ ❑
DEMONSTRATION OF ANALYST CAPABILITY
1)Was demonstration of capability conducted according to NELAC Appendix SC? — ❑
2)Is documentation of the analyst's demonstration of capability on file? 4 k 0 0
3)Is documentation of the analyst's proficiency up-to-date and on file? ❑ 0
PROFICIENCY TEST REPORTS
1)Are proficiency testing or-inter-laboratory comparison results on file? El ❑ ❑
LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES(SOPs):
1)Are laboratory SOPs current and on file for each method performed? ❑ ❑
1 NA=Not applicable;
2 CN#=Case Narrative identification number(Completed for an item if"No"is checked.)
Reviewed by:Int. ex Date: 2/2-5/5 •
28
4

Columbia Analytical Services,Inc. —Houston,TX
Case Narrative- Comments
Laboratory SDG Number: J0500343
Method/Compound List: 1613B PCDD PCDF
Project Chemist: Jane Freemyer ,
Sample Cross-Reference Table -
TCDF Confirmation
Sample ID Laboratory ID: Sample Matrix: Dilution: Req'd?
L3001 PW J0500343-001.01 Aqueous 1:1 No ,
F3006 PW J0500343-002.01 Aqueous 1:1 No
Field Blank J0500343-003.01 Aqueous 1:1 No
CN# Comment
EMPC-When the ion abundance ratios associated with a particular compound are outside the QC limits,samples are
01 flagged with a 'K'flag. A 'K'flag indicates an estimated maximum possible concentration for the associated compound.
The method blank had trace amounts of several compounds. These compounds are flagged with a'B'flag in the
02 associated samples.
The batch precision measurement,MS/MSD,was determined on another client's sample in the extraction batch. The
03 MS/MSD results are not included with this report. "
Please note the instrument ID on the forms is designated by the first letter;A,B,C or U of the filename field,rather than by the
instrument ID field.
CERTIFICATION
I certify this data package complies with the terms and conditions agreed to by the client and Columbia Analytical Services,Inc.,both
technically and for completeness;except for the conditions noted above: Release of the data contained in this analytical report has
been authorized by the Laboratory Director or designated person,as verified by the following signature.
SIGNED: "-Aer ��
� '7'C. :a e"/- /1'
DATE: .e .
Xiangqiu'Sam'Lian
Laboratory Director S ,
Reviewed by:Int. Date: 2/2$/�
5 •
29

CAS/HOU - Form Production, Peer Review & Project Review Signatures
alb
SR#Unique ID T o c-ro
First Level- Data Processing -to be filled by person generating the forms
Date O 7-i/G Fos' Person 1
Date Person 2
Second Level - Data Review-to be filled by person doing peer review
Date a 23 for Reviewer
Date Reviewer
Project Level - Review-to be filled by person doing project compliance review
Date 2/L5/5 Reviewer afp
•
•
•
•
1"
•
•
•
•
•
•
30
DATA REV SIG1(2/1/2005)

i
•
Method 1613B/Dioxins & Furans M _
Reporting Limits
•
CONGENER REPORTING LIMITS REPORTING LIMITS
CONGENER ABBREVIATION CAS RN .. Aqueous Solids
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 2378-TCDD PG NG
1746-01-6 1 00 0
1.0
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins 12378-PeCDD 40321-76-4 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 123478-HxCDD 39227-28-6. 50 5.0 "
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 123678-HxCDD 57653-85-7 50
12378 5.0
,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 123789-HxCDD 19408-74-3 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1234678-HpCDD 35822-46-9 50 5.0
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin OCDD 3268-87-9 100 10 ,
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 2378-TCDF 51207-31-9 10
il
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran 12378-PeCDF 57117-41-6 - 50 5.0
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran 5.0 tt 23478-PeCDF 57117-31-4 50 5.0
• 1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 123478-HxCDF 70648-26-9 50 5.0
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 123678-HxCDF 57117-44-9 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 123789-HxCDF 72918-21-9 50 5.0
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 234678-HxCDF 60851-34-5 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran 1234678-HpCDF 67562-39-4 50 5.0
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran 1234789-HpCDF 55673-89-7 • 50 5.0
Octachlorodibenzofuran OCDF 39001-02-0 100 10
Total Tetra-Dioxins * * 10
Total Penta-Dioxins * 5.0
* 50 5.0
Total Hexa-Dioxins * * 50
Total Hepta-Dioxins * * 5.0
Total Tetra-Furans * 50 5.0
* 10 1.0
Total Penta-Furans * * 50
Total 1-Iexa-Furans * 5.0
* 50 5.0
Total Hepta-Furans * * 50
5.0
NOTE:Tissue samples are reported on a wet-weight basis and soil/sediment samples are reported on a dry-weight basis.
4
YeYj

•
Data Qualifier Flags
❖ B Used when the analyte is found in the associated blank, as well as in the
sample
❖ C Indicates the value for the TCDF analyte must be obtained from the DB-225
confirmation column
❖ E Indicates an estimated value—used when the analyte concentration exceeds
the upper end of the linear calibration range
❖ J Indicates an estimated value—used when the analyte concentration is below
the method reporting limit(MRL)and above the detection limit(DL)
❖ K EMPC; maxiumum possible concentration estimated
❖ U Indicates the compound was analyzed and not detected:
❖ X User defined; see case narrative for detailed explanation
❖ Y Indicates the recovery of the labeled standard is outside the established
control limits
Indicates concentration is reported as Not Detected'
32

•
Page 2 of 2
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results METHOD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: EB20038-MB
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: C13655#1
Analysis Date: 3-FEB-05 Time: 21:18:06 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13652#12
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L t Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE • FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.596 U * * 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD * 0.584 U * * 1.04
1,2, 3,4, 7,8-HxCDD * 0.547 U * * 1.07 .
1,2, 3, 6, 7,8-HxCDD * 0.712 U * * 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HxCDD * 0.634 U * * 0.99
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDD 5.054 0.783 J 0.92 1.000 0.99
OCDD 50.092 0.994 J 0.90 1.000 1.02
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * 0.382 U * * 1.08
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.421 U * * 0.93
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.379 U * * 1.01
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.326 U * * 1.21
1,2,3, 6, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.345 U * * 1.19
1,2,3,7, 8,9-HxCDF * 0.391 U * * 1.26
2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HxCDF * 0.370 U * * 1.14
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDF 1.315 0.686 JK 1.27 1.000 1.43
1,2,3,4, 7,8, 9-HpCDF * 0.888 U * * 1.41
OCDF 4.542 1.047 J 0.81 1.004 1.37
Total Tetra-Dioxins * . 0.596 U .
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.584 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.547 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 12.470. 0.783
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.382 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.379 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.326 U _
Total Hepta-Furans * 0.686 U
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second .column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613 .
A
33

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES METHOD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:EB20038-MB
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or,mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 3-FEB-05 Time: 21:18:06 Sample Data Filename: C13655#1
Ext. Vol(uL) : 20.0 Inj . Vol(uL) : 1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13652#12
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L, % Solid/Lipids: .
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(U, QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND . (1) Limite(1) RATIO_ (2) (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS
13C-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 2000 1795.98 89.80 25-164 0.79 1.008
13C-1,2,3,7., 8-PeCDD 2000 2099.70 104.98 25-181. 1.52 1.187
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD 2000 2422.55 121.13 32-141 1.23 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 2000 2081.05 104.05 28-130 . 1.24 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2000 2176.49 108.82 ' 23-140 1.04 1.076
13C-OCDD 4000 3635.90 ' 90.90 17-157 0.88 1.165
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDF 2000 2034.58 , 101.73. 24-169 0,.77 0.976,
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 .1983.76 99.19 ' 24-185 1.53 1.145
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF . 2000 1994.71 99.74 - 21.-178 1.54 1.173
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2237.83 111.89 26-152 0.51 0.969
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2002.17 100.11. 26-123 , 0.47 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 2000 2531.52 ' 126.58 29-147 0.49 1.006
13C-2,3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF 2000 2063 .51 103 .18 28-136 0.49 0.986
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1923.68 96.18 28-143 0.43 1.050
13C-1,2,3;'4,7,8, 9-HpCDF 2000 2216.89 110.84 • 26-138 0.43 1.088
CLEANUP STANDARD
37C1-2,3,7,8-TCDD 800 713.62 89.20 . 35-197 1.009
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613.
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613. NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
10
34

Page 7 of 12
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results L3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract:
SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-001.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 890 P / g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol,(ul) :1. 0 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.338 U
*
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD • * 0.439 U * 0.98
*
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD * 0.318 U * * 0.9 0.15
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDD • * 8
0.387 U * *
1,2, 3, 7,8, 9-HxCDD * 0.354 0.08
U * * 1. 05
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDD 5.963 0.412 BJ 1.06
OCDD 73.607 0.575 BJ 1.000 1.01
0.89 1.000 1.05
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * 0.507 U
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * * . 1. 03
0.245 U *
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.227 1.01
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDF U * * 1. 08
0. 795 0.162 J 1. 03 1.000 1.28
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 0.177 U
* 23
,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * 0.209 U * 1.32
*.
,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 1.32
0.186 U * * 1.18
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 0. 885 0.306 BJK 1.21 1.000 1.53
1, 2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.415 •
OCDF U * * 1.48
4 .337 0.337 BJ 0.98 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.338 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.439 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.318 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 15.042 0.412
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.507 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.227 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.162 U
Total Hepta-Furans 2 .701 0.306
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613 .
35
�... 11

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND •
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES L3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-001.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 890 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
•
Ext.Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. RR) QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite (1) RATIO (2) (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS
13C-2, 3, 7,8-TCDD 2000 2514.84 125.74 25-164 0.78 1.011
13C-1, 2,3,7,8-PeCDD 2000 2706.24 135.31 25-181 1.57 1.208
13C-1, 2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD 2000 2519.90 126. 00. 32-141 1.25 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 2000 2519.09 125.95 28-130 1.28 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2000 2323.78 116.19 23-140 1.05 1.069
13C-OCDD 4000 3696.63 92 .42 17-157 0.91 1.142
13C-2, 3, 7, 8-TCDF 2000 2668.27 133 .41 24-169 0.80 0.972
13C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2687.21 134.36 24-185 1.57 1.162
13C-2, 3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2627.06 131.35 21-178 1.58 1.194
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2382 .72 119.14 26-152 0.53 0.969
13C-1,2,3, 6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2379.31 118.97 26-123 0.53 0.972
13C-1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 2000 2678.34 133.92 29-147 0.54 1.005
13C-2,3,4, 6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2326.70 116.33 28-136 0.53 0.986
13C-1, 2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 2234.62 111.73 28-143 0.45 1. 046
13C-1, 2,3,4, 7, 8,9-HpCDF 2000 2449.32 122.47 26-138 0.44 1. 079
CLEANUP STANDARD
1
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 766.82 95.85 35-197
1.012
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
•
/� 36

Page 7 of 12
Form 3
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
Use for Sample and Blank Results L3001 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract:
SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-001.05 •
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 890
g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext_Vol. (u1) :20.0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21239#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 19:39:10 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L qs Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * X 1. 0 *
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD * X 0.5 *
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1• *
•
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD . * X 0.1. *
1,2, 3, 7, 8,9-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD 5.963 X 0. 01
OCDD 5.96e-02
73 .607 X 0.001 7.36e-02
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.05 *
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.5 *
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDF 0.795 X 0.1
1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 7.95e-0*
X 0.1
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1
*
1,2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HpCDF 0. 885 X 0.01 •
1,2,3,4, 7, 8,9-HpCDF * 8.85e-03
OCDF X 0 . 01 *
4.337 X 0. 001 4.34e-03
Total: 2.26e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. ) .
6/90
37
•
1q

Page 8 of 12
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-002.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960
g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1. 0 Sample Data Filename: U21240#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 20:26:22 . Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.285 U *
1,2, 3, 7,8-PeCDD * 0.297 U * * 0.98
0.98
1,2, 3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.265 U * * 1.15
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.321 U
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDD * 0.294 U * * 0.98
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H CDD 1.05
P 6.289 0.522 BJ 0.98 1.000 1.01
OCDD 69.053 0.577 BJ 0. 87 1.000 1.05
2,3,7, 8-TCDF * 0.378 U *
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF * 0. 162 U * * 1. 01
1
2, 3,4, 7,8-PeCDF * 0.150 U * * 1.081.0
1,2,3,4-,7, 8-HxCDF *
0.160 U * * 1.28
1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDF * 0.170 U
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * * 1.32
0.195 U * * 1.32
2, 3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF * 0.185 U
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-H CDF * 1.53
P 1.008 0.236 BJ 1.19 1.000 1.53
1,2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.314 U
* 1.48 OCDF
4.171 0.299 BJ 0.91 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.285 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.297 U
Total Hexa-Dioxins * 0.265 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 14 .268 0.522
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.378 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.150 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.160 U
Total Hepta-Furans 3 .569 0.236
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613 .
• 38
14

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2 : PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD'RECOVERIES F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-002 .05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960 - g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5 '
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 20:26:22- Sample' Data Filename: U21240#.1
Ext.Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 • Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
•
Concentration Units (pg/L or- ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solid/Lipids: • - •
ION
SPIKE CONC. ' R(%) ' QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) . RATIO (2) (2)
- LABELED COMPOUNDS
. 13C-2,3, 7,.8-TCSD 2000 2601.95' 130:10 25-164 0.78 . 1.011
13C-1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDD ' 2000 2693.93 134.70 25-181 1.58 1.208
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ' . 2000 2570.91 12.8.55 32-141 1.25 0.989
13C-1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HxCDD 2000 2507.04 125.35 28-130 1.26 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 2000 2303.86 115.19 23-140 . 1.04 1.068
13C-OCDD 4000 3704.05 92.60 17-157 0.91 1.142
•
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 2000 2710,84 135.54 24-169 0.79 0.971
13C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2738.60 136.93 24-185 1.56 1.162
•
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 2000 2654.04 132.70 21-178 1.58 1.194
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2353 .31 117.67 26-152 0.53 0'.969
13C-1,2,3,.6, 7,8-HxCDF 2000 2383 .04 119.15 • 26-123 0.53 0.972
13C-1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF • 2000 2788.97 139.45 29-147 0.52 1.005
13C-2,3,4, 6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2323.34 116.17 28-136 . :0.53 0.986
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF . 2000 2217.75 110.89 . 28-143 • 0.44 1.046
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 2000 2432.39 121.62 26-138 0.44 1.079 '
CLEANUP STANDARD •
37C1-2,3, 7,8-TCDD 800 772.99 96.62 35-197
1.012
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7; Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
• specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613. NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard): .
RFP C500273T1
•
39
. 15

•
Page 8 of 12
Form 3
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
Use for Sample and Blank Results F3006 PW
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract:
SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-002 .05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 960 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext_Vol. (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21240#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 20:26:22 Blank Data Filename: •C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION,
2,3,7, 8-TCDD * X 1.0 *
1, 2, 3,.7,8-PeCDD * X 0 .5 *
1, 2, 3,4•,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 6, 7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDD 6.289 X 0.01
OCDD 6.29e-02
69.053 X 0.001 6.91e-02
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.05 *
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.5 - *
1, 2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
1,2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
1,2,3, 7, 8,9-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
2, 3,4,6, 7, 8-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
•
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1. 008 X 0.01
1,2,3,4, 7,8, 9-HpCDF * 1. 01e-02
X 0. 01 *
OCDF
4 .171 X 0.001 4.17e-03
Total: 1.46e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. )
6/90
40

Page 9 of 12
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-003.05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 670 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05. Istrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1 .
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12:57 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) . (2) RRF
2,3, 7, 8-TCDD * 0.353 U
*
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD . * 0.98
0.419 U * *
98
1,2, 3,4,7,8-HxCDD * 0.416 U * 0.* 15
1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HxCDD * 0.529 U * 0.98
1,2,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDD * * 0.98
0.473 U * * 1.05
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDD 6.895 0.612 BJ 1.00 1. 000 1.01
OCDD 85. 718 0.702 BJ
2,3, 7, 8-TCDF * 0.552 U * *0'8 9 1.00 1.01 1.053
1,2, 3, 7, 8-PeCDF * 0.216 U *
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * * 1.01
0.212 U * * 1.08
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.930 0.170
JK 1.47 1.000 1.28
1,2, 3,6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 0.181 U
*
, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9-HxCDF * 0.216 U * 1.32
2, 3,4, 6, 7, 8-HxCDF * * 1.18
0.194 U * * 1.18
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HpCDF 1.195 0.284 BJ 1. 09 1.000 1.53
1,2, 3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 0.376
OCDF U * * 1.48
4. 907 0.404 BJ 0.94 1.004 1.25
Total Tetra-Dioxins * 0.353 U
Total Penta-Dioxins * 0.419
Total Hexa-Dioxins * U
0.416 U
Total Hepta-Dioxins 16. 011 0.612
Total Tetra-Furans * 0.552 U
Total Penta-Furans * 0.212 U
Total Hexa-Furans * 0.170 U
Total Hepta-Furans 4.044 0.284
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
from second column analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613 .
• 41
17

USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2 : PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:J0500343-003 .05
•
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol: 670 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
Sample Receipt Date: O1/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12 :57 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1
Ext.Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj .Vol (ul) :1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1
Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg •dry weight) : pg/L % Solid/Lipids:
ION
SPIKE CONC. R(%) QC ABUND. RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1) RATIO (2) (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS
13C-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 2000 2553.68 127.68 25-164 0.80 1.010
13C-1,2,3,7, 8-PeCDD 2000 2680.69 134.03 25-181 1.55 1.208
13C-1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDD 2000 : 2624.76 131.24 32-141 1.26 0.990
• 13C-1,2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDD 2000 2393.64 119.68 28-130 1.28 0.992 -
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-HpCDD 2000 2219.06 110.95 23-140 1.06 1.069
13C-OCDD 4000 3493.89 87.35' 17-157 0.90 1.143
13C-2, 3,7,8-TCDF 2000 2676.42 133.82 24-169 0.79 0.971
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 2680.90 134.05 24-185 1.55 1.162
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 2000 •2574.81 128.74 21-178 1.55 1.194
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 2000 2435.97 121.80 26-152 0.52 0.969
13C-1, 2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDF • 2000 2317.08 115.85 26-123 0.52 0.972
13C-1;2, 3,7,8, 9-HxCDF 2000 2716.91 135.85 29-147 0.52 1.006
13C-2,3,4,6,7, 8-HxCDF 2000 2297.61 114.88 28-136 0.53 0.986
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF 2000 2116.32 105.82 28-143 0.46 1.046
13C-1,2,3,4,7, 8, 9-HpCDF 2000 2396.73 119.84 26-138 0.45 1.079
CLEANUP STANDARD
•
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 762.38 95.30 35-197 1.011
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, Method 1613 .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRTs and ion abundance ratios are
specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standard) .
RFP C500273T1
42
111

Page 9 of 12
Form 3
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF TOXICITY EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
Use for Sample and .Blank Results FIELD BLANK
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: J0500343-003 .05
Client Name: INTERNATIONAL PAPER Sample Wt/Vol : 670 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 10/25/04
•
Sample Receipt Date: 01/27/05 Instrument ID: AutoSpec-Ultima
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Ext Vol. (ul) :20. 0 Inj .Vol. (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: U21241#1
Analysis Date: 4-FEB-05 Time: 21:12 :57 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 Cal. Ver. Data Filename: U21233#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L % Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION TEF(1) TEF-ADJUSTED
CONCENTRATION
•
2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD * X 1.0 *
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD * X 0.5 *
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
•1,2,3, 6,7, 8-HxCDD * X 0.1 \ *
1,2, 3, 7,8, 9-HxCDD * X 0.1 *
1,2,3,4, 6, 7, 8-HxCDD 6.895 X 0.01
OCDD 85.718 6.89e-02
2,3,7, 8-TCDF X 0.101 8 .57e-0
* *X 0.1
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0. 05 *
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF * X 0.5 *
1,2,3,4,7, 8-HxCDF 0.930 X 0.1
1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HxCDF * 9.30e-02
X 0.1 *
1,2, 3,7, 8,9-HxCDF * X 0.1 *
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF * X 0.1 * .
1,2, 3,4, 6,7, 8-HpCDF 1 . 195 X 0 .01
1,2,3,4, 7, 8, 9-HpCDF * 1.20e-02
OCDF X 0.01 *
4.907 X 0.001 4. 91e-03
Total: 2.65e-01
(1) Taken from 'Interim Procudures for Estimating Risks Associated with
Exposures to Mixtures of Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and -Dibenzofurans
(CDDs and CDFs) and 1989 Update(EPA/625/3-89/016, March 1989. )
6/90
is
43

n
+ 44;
Columbia
Analytical
-
Services'.
An
•
•
•
Accuracy & Precision Data
10655 Richmond Avenue,Suite 130-A,Houston, TX 77042
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
www.caslab.com
2n
44

3DFA
1613 PCDD/PCDF SPIKED SAMPLE SUMMARY
CLIENT ID
Lab Name: • COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL, SERVICES I
LCS
Lab Code: CAS LAB. ID: EB20038
Matrix: Aqueous (Solid, Aqueous, Ash, Waste)
CONCENTRATION UNITS: (pg/L or ng/Kg) pg/L
•
SPIKE .LCS LCSD
ADDED SAMPLE SAMPLE LCS% LCSD'E RPD QC
ANALYTE (PG) CONC. CONC. RECOV. # RECOV. # $ LIMITS
2378-TCDD 200. 175.175 87.59 50 - 150
12378-PeCDD 1000 . 776.407 - 77.64 50 - 150
123478-HxCDD 1000 633.919 63.39 50 - 150
123678-HxCDD 1000 756.731 75.67 50 - 150
123789-HxCDD 1000 682.770 68.28 - 50 - 150
1234678-HpCDD 1000 772.437 77.24 50 - 150
•
OCDD 2000 2037.356 101.87 50 - 150
2378-TCDF .200 183.209 91.60 50 - 150
12378-PeCDF 1000 888.190 88.82 50 - 150
23478-PeCDF 1000 797.528 79.75 50 - 150
123478-HxCDF 1000 747.870 74.79 50 - 150
12367E-HxCDF 1000 793.599 79.36 50 - 150
123789-HxCDF 1000 643.098 64.31 50 - 150
234678-HxCDF 1000 760.049 76.00 50 - 150
1234678-HpCDF 1000 710.196 71.02 50 - 150
1234789-HpCDF 1000 689.175 68.92 50 - 150
OCDF 2000 156,3.182 78.16
50 - 150
If an analyte is not detected in either analysis, enter 0 (zero)
as the concentration.
# Column to be used to flag values outside QC limits.
•
* Compound outside the QC advisory limits of 50 - 150 '
•
EB20038 lcs
•
21
•
45

•
Page 9 of 9
Form 1
CLIENT ID.
PCDD/PCDF ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Use for Sample and Blank Results LAB SPIKE
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID: EB20038-LCS
Client Name: Sample Wt/Vol: '1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: 08/10/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column:DB-5
Ext. Vol (ul) :20.0 Inj . Vol (ul) :1.0 Sample Data Filename: C13671#8
Analysis Date: 8-FEB-05 Time: 16:56:55 Blank Data Filename: C13655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 • Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13671#1
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight) : pg/L 9 Solids/Lipids:
CONCENTRATION DETECTION Qual. ION ABUND. RRT MEAN
ANALYTE FOUND LIMIT (1) RATIO (2) (2) RRF
• 2,3,7, 8-TCDD 175.175 1.385 0.70 1.001 0.95
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDD 776.407 1.019 1.60 1.001 1. 04
1,2,3,4, 7, 8-Hp6D 633.919 1.157 1.21 1.000 1. 07
1,2,3,6, 7, 8-HpCDD 756.731 1,.317 1.17 1.000 0.95
. 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HpCDD 682 .770 1.253 1.18 1.009 0.99
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDD 772.437 2.653 1.07 1.000 0.99
OCDD 2037.356 7.204 0.85 1.000 1.02
2,3,7, 8-TCDF 183.209 1.201 ' 0.77 1.001 1..08
1,2,3, 7, 8-PeCDF 888.190 1.031 1.51 1.001 0.93
2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF 797.528 1.010 1.53 1.001 1.01
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HpCDF 747.870 0.891 1.22 1.000 1.21
1,2,3,.6, 7,8-HxCDF 793.599 0.948 1.20 1.000 1.19
1,-2,3,7, 8,9-HxCDF 643.098 1.175 1.20 ' 1.000 1.26
2,3,4, 6, 7,8-HpCDF 760.049 1.078 1.21 1.001 1.14
1,2,3,4, 6,7,8-HpCDF 710.196 1.781 1.02 1.000 1.43
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 689. 175 2.763 1.03 1.000 . 1.41
OCDF 1563.182 7.362 0.87 1.005 1.37
Total Tetra-Dioxins 175. 175 1.385
Total Penta-Dioxins 776.407 1.019
Total Hexa-Dioxins 2073 .420 1.157
Total Hepta-Dioxins 821. 922 2.653
Total Tetra-Furans 187.355 1.201
Total Penta-Furans 1691.924 1.010
Total Hexa-Furans 2944.616 0.891
Total Hepta-Furans 1429.443 1.781
(1) Qualifier U indicates not detected; The K indicates EMPC. The C needs value
•
from second column. analysis. The B indicates possible blank contamination.
(2) RRTs and ion ratios are specified in Tables 2 and 9, Method 1613 .
•
22
46

•
USEPA, EAD
CLIENT ID.
FORM 2: PCDD/PCDF LABELED COMPOUND AND
CLEANUP STANDARD RECOVERIES LAB SPIKE
•
Lab Name: Columbia Analytical Services Contract: SDG No:
Lab Code: CAS Method:1613 Case No: Client No: Lab ID:EB20038-LCS -. •
Client Name:' Sample Wt/Vol: 1000 g or mL: mL
Matrix (Solid/Aqueous/Waste/Ash) : Aqueous Initial Calibration Date: OB/1.0/04
Sample Receipt Date: Instrument ID: 70S
Ext. Date: 01/31/05 GC Column ID: DB-5
Analysis Date: 8-FEB-05 Time: 16:56:55 Sample Data Filename: C13671#8
Ext. Vol (uL) : - 20.0 Inj : Vol (uL) : 1.0 Blank Data Filename: C13.655#1
Dilution Factor: 1 .Cal. Ver. Data Filename: C13671#1 -
Concentration Units (pg/L or ng/Kg dry weight): pg/L % Solid/Lipids:
•
ION
• SPIKE CONC. . R(%) QC ABUND.' RRT
CONC. FOUND (1) Limite(1)" RATIO. (21 (2)
LABELED COMPOUNDS
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDD 2000 1570.98 78.55 25-164 0.79 1.008.
13C-1,2, 3,7,5-PeCDD 2000 2082.32 ' 104.12 . 25-181 1.54 1.178
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDD 2000 2163 .53 108.18 32-141 1.21 0.990
13C-12,,3,6,7,8-HpCDD , 2000 2003.96 100.20 28-130 1.23 0.992
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7, 8-HpCDD 2000 . 1493.29 ' 74.66 23-140 1.03 1.078
13C-OCDD 4000` 1379.88. 34.50 17-157 0.87 1.168
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDF 2000 1299.76 64.99 24-169 0.77 0.977
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2000 1937.01 96.85 24-185 1.52 1.137
13C-2,3,4, 7, 8-PeCDF 2000 1774.66 88.73 21-178 1.52 1.165
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1791.18 89.56 26-152 ' 0.49 0.970
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2000 1630.43 81.52 26-123 _ 0.49 0.972
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDF 2000 1791.97 89.60 . 29-147 0.49 1. )06
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1591.70 79.58 28-136 - 0.49 0.986
13C-1,2, 3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2000 1507.94 75.40 28-143 0.44 .1.050
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 2000 1385.61 69.28 26-138 0..43 1.090
CLEANUP STANDARD '
37C1-2,3,7, 8-TCDD 800 634..92 79.36 35-197 1.008
(1) Contract-required limits for percent recovery (R) are specified
in Table 7, -Method 1613 .' .
(2) Contract-required limits for RRT's and ion abundance ratios are
• • specified in Tables 2 and 9, respectively, Method 1613 . NOTE: There
is no ion abundance ratio for 37C14-2378-TCDD (cleanup standa-rd) .
RFP C500273T1
•
47
23

411,
Columbia
Analytical
Services
An -Owned OwnPanY
.
Chain-of-custody
.4•
10655 Richmond Avenue,Suite 130-A,Houston,TX 77042
Phone[phone] Fax [phone]
www.caslab.com
48
24

• Intra-Network Chain of Custod ' . ei
8540 Baycenter Rd.•Jacksonvill FL 32256•904-739-2277•FAX [phone]IcA0t: Tom its".
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells _ __ I
Project Number: j y
Project Manager: Tom Richardson
01
Company: International Paper •• �Er. al
M
on sc)
•
Sample Date
X
.
Lab Code Client Sample ID
P eMatrix Date Time Received.
J0500343-001 1 L3001 PW Water 01/25/05 0923- 01/26/05 II
•
J0500343-002 F3006 PW Water 01/25/05 -0953 . 01/26/05 II ,
J0500343-003 Field Blank Water 01/25/05 . 1000 I 01/26/05 1 II
•
•
Test Comments
DIOXINS FURANS-1613B 10500343 001 Houston DIOXWS_FURANS-1613B J0500343-002 Houston
DIOXINS FURANS-1613E J0500343-003 .Houston ,
•
. LC
•
•
•
Special Instructions/Comments
Turnaround Requirements Report Requirements
V.inf9
41-\W"
Iovoice Information
0a-at \ RUSH(Surcharges Apply) I.Results Only
PLEASE CIRCLE WORK DAYS II.Results+QC Summaries
JA •�1l , - —. PO#
L 2 3 4 5
�.'\�//p/\ - 111.Results+QC and Calibration Summaries J0500343
V0 I STANDARD
•
IV.Data Validation Report with Raw Data
Requested FAX Date: Bill to
PQL/MDL/J y ,
Requested Report-Date: 02/16/05 EDD Y
Relinquished By:� 1A ,�4. !r' ,TJ $ 'Received By: e
�+` � '� Airbill Number:
t r lI /� 1t l //) 2/l'!� /r�`C4'

Service.Request Summary
Folder#: J0500343 Project Chemist: Tom Kissinger
Client Name: International Paper Originating Lab: JAX
Project Name: LF#2 Private Wells
Project Number: • Due Date: 03/04/2005
EDD: IP 1_CLN
Report To: Tom Richardson Tier: II
International Paper
6400 Poplar Ave QAPP: LAB-QAP
Phone Number: 901-419-3878 Qualifier Set: CAS Standard
Fax Number: 901-419-3962
E-mail: [e-mail] r CAS Standard
Meergeed?d?:: Y
Report to MDL?: Y
Lab Code Client Sample COC Matrix Sample Date Sample Time Receive Date
J0500343-001 LF3001 PW Water 01/25/2005 0923 01/26/2005
160.1 1613B 2340 B 300.0 300.0 300.0
TDS DIOXINS_FURANS HARD_CALC CL NO3 SO4
310.1 405.1 410.2 415.1 6010B 6020
ALK_TITR BOD_SDAY COD TOC_T METALS T METALS T
7470A — —
HGT
•
6020 . METALS_T As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se Ag Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
1613B DIOXINS_FURANS Houston .
J0500343-002 LF3006 PW Water 01/25/2005 0953 01/26/2005
160.1 16]3B 2340 B 300.0
300.0 300.0
TDS
DIOXINS_FURANS HARD_CALC CL NO3 SO4
310.1 405.1 410.2 415.1 ' 6010B ' 6020
ALK_TITR BOD_5DAY COD TOC_T METALS T METALS T
7470A — —
HG T
6020 METALS_T As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se Ag Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
1613B DIOXINS_FURANS Houston
J0500343-003 Field Blank Water 01/25/2005 1000 01/26/2005
160.1 1613B 2340 B 300.0
TDS 300.0 300.0
DIOXINS_FURANS HARD_CALC CL NO3 SO4
310.1 • 405.1 410.2 415.1 6010B 6020
ALK_TITR - BOD_SDAY COD TOC_T METALS T METALS_T
7470A — -- _-- - -
HG_T
6020 METALS_T As Ba Cd Cr Cu Pb Mn Se Ag Zn
6010B METALS_T Fe Ca K Na
I613B DIOXINS_FURANS Houston
•
50
. •

No Project Lab . Client Sample Tare Tare& Tam& Calculated Sample
. ID ID : ID Size Vial Wet Dry Percent Description Grams Sample _Sample Solid Moisture pH
no EB20038-MB Method Blank 1000
'..•. .
. .: .' :. , . ...-': .. ...:-
-: : : .:.• :.... •
.,..i;i ::; : •.i:::::• i ': :. : .,. ...s......i...... a ":, 'I t666046 t0506040400101 idkiAlAtii0Z494k 5;b Yilip*niiiiialytOiiY•liquid
E0500040 E0500040-00201 003B1B2,B3 COM :":::.•:•,'.-.:.',:-:.:14..
. 7.0. Dark brown clear liquid
..:.'3::....:: ::.koiltfoifj..,..::,•:: .:..:tef .titi.6•43,461.:.;.61:.:.•:.i:,,:,'....-.:.:••::::;',..:i::: ::.:....................................................::::i.....: ?:::: :::: ::;?..,i-....:16 .c-,.:!,..:•:-.:.....:-.:1.,.......:••.s.,.,:...-,.::. ::•.--..:-:••••: -',:••:: :.•••••••::- .:: --.. , ,,.......:::6:6,:.,-...oi.- - 1.....is ....d„,.,...,.: „,:,,,..:.:.:,:„.:,„:,•••. ..
..... ' •• • • ... .. . . . .. . ....
....... . ..
4 E0500043 E0500043-002.01 BiS-2 . . 1050
6.0 Light yellow slightly cloudy liquid
.. • • . -• ' • ' ... ......"..''''".":''."*.'''''''''Ite54:.!''''''.:'• .'" ....'"':''''''....:: :."Iiiiitf'"".:'.:..:.:..... '"...:.' ''"•' :"...:.'".",..%:":.. ...... '-'... . ... -:1.:... •.0"."..ro—"moderately•.. icloudy.. ..1 if:'...............:"::'
s::•i :::::::E05000.43.-..„ :::'..E050004340Q1:01 ':':' •....:.-.'. :.....:.:..;.....::„..i::::.:...;-... . .......-.-.......,..•••••••::••i,::„::i-, • ..- •,-,- :..:.. ••.,...::.:... ..:••••••:'•• .•,.........:::.i...,,,,.:•;;F.:.........::.,: ••:•::,:-.e ow . rqur
6 E0500052 E0500052-001.01 A'&13 OUTLET 001 . 985
7.0 Brown cloudy liquid
.•.:i:..,'.....-....:M0030:: *.-:.:,..i:J05003430Q1'.05..:•:'•,, •-•...,:::.....,.....- ,. •13001*Krot.:,:.••:••••',•.......,.,:.i,,• .;..1;...-...:...11r12.,...•..'':i.....:•:.....:: .......'.... . - 1.. ..:...:'. ::.,.... ....... .........,.:.. 3 .. - .. ...............:.......:.......:.2,.........._i.•..;:::.:..........:.:,.:...,.........................„....:i.:?.......:.•.-.-•.•..,::•,:•E..:::.i.:-.::--.••••.::.:•i .;•......c:-..a.:'.i:i:-I•:i:::.';,,;',':'••:':i::-'';.':•''..:‘..-:.:'''.'.''''..:• ..... ; eari.'et rass:liquids J0500343 J0500343-002.05 F006PW ..:i960 .i , , , •... . .5.0 Lightyelowmdt ie•-_,'-..l2..•y
c..,,..lo;.;..u...•...d.i'.::-::.:y.-....:.;.;:i•l:.,:. id 16506341aj666634j4/030$ R44111irkf00 : 510HOjoai.joiiiiii$414tko E0500054 E0500054-000 1015011705 1000 : 6.0 Tan cloudy liquid
B0560655 E050005540()01 05114314toikg 880 60 - diii4OfOiawii4j4E0500057 05000700101 COMPOSTE#1,#2 HWD .:..•.::.:.::::::,.::.:..i..2..'-:.-.:5;1i::',
3.0 Light yellow cloudy liquid
:.2.-.'13lf:c':::::;:E1i50005.7.:'ir...'i';',J;'i::-:BiI5(iti061.41(i.i0.I..;:..'i:....'';'.!:.•• •:: :.••;3:.'COMP.0511B,#3:.SW.....i..::•.:....:-.:.::.:::.:•?:..:-':i:911Y•••,••.::::-.::,::',.::: -:.:•••••••:*'..,-.•-•:',..--.. .. ...........!...:•••.'., ..':: . .---;:::..4;P:s..:.:::YellOWSlightlyrelnitilkIiiinid.•::..•.::::...;..,:„.i..........,..:....:::..
14 E0500058 E0500058-001.01 INFLUENT COMPOSITE 4509 1040
6.5 Gray cloudy liquid
.. ... . .. . ..
.:i''..1*... i.,::.kt050008:4!:•.:-..i.::.:::.0056005849.24.1::.;:::... ..i.i's'.:,03MBitkIEVIEEPUEIITICOMP:4.51:11]:.:::.::::i..,11)49;:::.,?i,,is-?::,::::.::::::::::::f....,:::-y,i.....:::,...-.....:. :,,:::::...,..:....-..::.;:...:]:i.:-:......s.-........:::.:6S:::'.'Y61161;iiiii*k*oiljoiii.ii::::.,:::?::!i::...:.......::.:.:::•.:•:.i.H.:.A
16 E0500058 i0500058-003.01DUP COMBINED EFFUENT COMP 4510DUP 1040 • ...........'
.6.5 Yellow gray cloudy liquid
. . . .. ..,.. . . ........ ... ... ...... . ..,. .. .. .. „ .. .. . . . ..... .. ...... . ..... . ....
E
IT - '1''.... g0.5.0.0(158!.:i.:•.:-;'14500.0554104i.01M5':•:, ..;'..:-cpi80010EMIESIctiMP:4.51)010k ::'.. .034n:i'..i's::,:a::::::::;::::: :•:'i.]:::::::•i'.:•:"•••,' :•::::":'':':.•.•..........:'i.: :.::':' : '•.J.:::?...:.:.;.::: ......65:::-.:Yellow.grty.oloiidkliii*" ....;;;!:;:.:•;:.: :.:.:::::..:::::..:';..
is E0500058 iosoiliisi-005.01i1SD COMBINED EFFUENT COMP 4510MSij 1040 •
6.5 Yellow gray cloudy liquid •
.. . . .,..,..................„... . ..... ................,...„..- ............ ....... ..... :..... ...... . . ... ........ .,.........,......,... .. ... ... ........... ....... ......
. . ... . ... . ... ... .... .............
i.:•.::.,i':B0500.0581''.:':' :.!'. B05000584/00.:.0.1::i.:.,• :':';:'''•':•]:':::'::P.P.0.0.14...BOrtC0/0140Wiit:f.2! ]i.::f..-.:.1'0$1..':.'::,a:::::...-:•::'.'*: .:::i::::..n.: :::. : ..'.:i„:.:.!.:: ::..„- : :...:,.:'. .::....:•:,,,,OS:.:1:YellpwgiayelOtidy.liquidiv.''.'.::''.:":?.::•:'.i:1•••••.:...:::
20 E0500061 ........-601.01 MW-3 1660
5.0 Clear colorless liquid
.._ .'i.ii-•':: ::':.-•:•:4t05e011.61-.,:. .:..;..:?E05606.5,-14).62.01 .:.:•:. ''''.....H.-14.:i....:..'is• tigitt1;55 .:.:.."''','- ::..f.'::Z:::::•::::::: ;".:,:'.....:..-1-. I00/.i:::::•. ;:;:-::';;i.::: i.i:::::: :::";;'2•:::::::-.-- :::;.::.....::::...::.•::.:.;'.''. .::••••••;:i-,::•', :•i'..:•.'. : :.:54.;.....'OnforiiiiiSfiglitliffiln01iIiiiid.i,,i,:•••,.-i"....:A::....:.i..a.'
22 E0500061 E0500061-003.01 MW-B 1070
--.:.,-j..F.i.i-:,:.:.::::i•:::..., . 5.0 Clear colorless liquid
'..-. ',i':.-•::::':::).:';':::.'.:.::.:::::',... .:...,•....:,... •!:.'..."..::::::.:'....'...:,.:.'::.:•::. .."i'l,...'.,..1:'.:::'.:.'.:-.:....:::....::•:::.7'.....:::.::•:::'.':::.::,:•:::'.-.:.::::N:".:•::-.....".......'.'•:.i....:•:::•:;;.:!;::::::....:.:••-•:.::::.i;i*:.::::::::::'.::..:-:•:. -.........-::::::.:..:••••::-:;:-:::•.i....... .., •.::,•-•.i:fi:'::::.::i:.:••:•.'::.'''.:'•:•:•-'.?:..•:?•::::•.-::;::...i. :.••:' s....-::**.';':::•''.-•:.. ..:•:1',':-'1:::::': • :-..::.:'.•''' '••:'.....' •,,.':........ . : c`'
24
•
26
.
SODIUM SULFATE C1-71-2
Mandate Internal Matex
ACETONE C1-68-3
SAND C1-33-1
Solution ID: D7-17-2B D7-12-513 EXTRACTION START: 01/31/05
TOLUENE C1-74-3
TRIDECANE C1-74-2 • Volume: 1000 ul 100 uL EXTRACTION END: 01/31/05
GLASS WOOL GW1-1-4
SULFURIC ACID C1-74-3
Spier: RD RD EXTRACTION METHOD Sep Funnel
DICHLOROMETHANE C1-73-3 BASIC SILICA GEL S1-24-3
Witness: KM KM •
ETHYL ACETATE C1-69-4
CARBON: C1-73-5
Date: 1/31/2005 1/31/2005 TIME STARTED:10:00
NONANE C1-67-5
ACIDIC SIUCA GEL S1-244
SlandarCleanu TIME FINISHED:15:00
HIDCANE C1-73-2
SIUCA GEL SI-22-6
Solution ID: D7-14-4A/B Al......x,/4
Volume: 100 uL .j EXTRACTS RECEIVED BY 4j ."'' ..:
Spkes: DHF 01-On
Columbia Analytical Service%INC-
Winless: CID
Date: 2/2/2005 V DATE RECEIVED:2/03/05
___ _____
EB20038
1613
.---
SulfuriiAcid Cleanup:2/02/05
Mien GeWCarbert Colunuc 2/02/05
• .
•
•