NC0024333_Headworks Analysis_20200625

Monroe
City of
monroenc.org • 704-282-4601 • PO Box 69, Monroe, NC 2811 1
Water Resources
June 25, 2020
Mr. Monti Hassan RECEIVED
NCDWR PERCS Unit
1617 Mail Service Center SUN 2 9 2020
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 NCDEGIIDWRINPDES
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dear Mr. Hassan:
Please find enclosed for your review a copy of the 2020 HWA for the City of Monroe Wastewater
Treatment Plant NPDES #NC0024333. Also enclosed are copies of design data, uncontrolled LTMP
data, Removal Rate calculations, SIU/Uncontrolled Mass Balance spreadsheets, hardness water quality
standards calculator, applicable pages of Biosolids Annual Report and a copy of the Land Application
Permit for the City of Monroe. For Silver, the uncontrolled data showed all less than detection, therefore
0 mg/1 was used for uncontrolled concentration.
Should you require additional information please do not hesitate to call Kevin Keesler at(704) 282-4632
or Kyle Ketchum at [phone].
Respectfully,
Kyle Ketchum Kevin Keesler
Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent Pretreatment Coordinator
C: WWTP/IUP file
I: 8040/Pretreatment Program/Headworks Analysis/HWA 2020

Workbook Name: HWA AT 2020 Master; Worksheet Name: HWA Page 1 of
Printed 6/24/2020,1:30 PM
A I B I C I D L E I F I G I H I I I J I K
1 Headworks Analysis Spreadsheet Spreadsheet Instructions:
2 POTW Name: City of Monroe 1) Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered Blue cells. The rest of worksheet is
3 Date: 6/24/2020 protected,password is"2"
4 POTW NPDES#_> NC0024333 2) Additional pollutants can be added in cells A34 to A42. Note all Pollutant names are linked from
5 POTW Sludge Permit#=> WQ0001346 here to other pages in HWA worksheet and also to AT worksheet(i.e.,automatically entered into
other pages in HWA worksheet and also AT worksheet from HWA worksheet).
7 POTW NPDES Permitted Flow(MGD)= 10.4 <=used in AT only 3) Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance HWA Chapter.
8 POTW Average Flow(MGD)= 6.9022 <=used in HWA calculations 4) HWA,AT and HASL worksheets are linked. MAHLs,Basis,and Uncontrollable load are
9 Uncontrollable Flow(MGD)= 3.9179 automatically entered into AT from this worksheet.
10 7Q10 Stream Flow(MGD)= 0.28 5)If red tab notes are not visible,they can be turned on in the"Tools"menu under"options",in the
11 Stream Classification= C "view"tab click the"comment indicator only"button.
13 Class of Sludge generated(A,or B) B _
14 Sludge to Digestor Flow(MGD)= Through calc.for different POTW use Design
g
15 Sludge to Disposal Flow(MGD)= 0.003214 flows Criteria
16 %Solids to Disposal= 32.95 Design Values Average Flow Permitted Flow Loading
17 Sludge Site Area(acres)= 297.65 Using Attach A ratio WWTF Influent BOD(mg/1) 252 365.0 242.2 x
18 Sludge Site Life(yrs)= 45 WWTF Influent TSS(mg/1) 240 1310.0 869.4 x
19 Age of Sludge Site(yrs)= 15 WWTF Influent NH3(mg/1) 25.4 40.0 26.5 x
20 WWTF Influent Total N(mg/I)
21 Pass-Through Loading Calculations WWTF Influent Total P(mg/I)
-_ Standard Pass-Thru Minimum
NPDES LIMIT Plant Removal NPDES Loading Stream Standard Stream Loading Design Criteria Loading Pass-Thru
23 Pollutant (mg/I) Rate(%) Removal rate Source (lbs/day) (mg/I) Standard Source (lbs/day) Loading(lbs/day) (lbs/day) Basis
24 BOD 7.3 98 DMR/LTMP/Dir. 21,011 21,857 21,857 Design
25 TSS 30 97.71 DMR/LTMP 75,412 20.817 20,817 Design
26 Ammonia 1 97.5 Blower cap/design 2,303 2,203 2,203 Design
27 Arsenic 45 DMR/LTMP 0.01 calculator HH 1.0891 1.0891 Stream Std
28 Cadmium 67 Literature 0.002 calculator WQS 0.3630 0.3630 Stream Std
29 Chromium 82 Literature 0.011 calculator WQS 3.6605 3.6605 Stream Std
30 Copper 80.21 DMR/LTMP 0.0318 calculator WQS 9.6251 9.6251 Stream Std
31 Cyanide 0.0051 69 Literature 0.9470 0.9470 NPDES
32 Lead 61 Literature 0.0179 calculator WQS 2.7492 2.7492 Stream Std
33 Mercury 98.57 DMR/LTMP 0.000012 calculator WQS 0.05027 0.05027 Stream Std
34 Molybdenum _ 33 Literature "
35 Nickel 27.56 DMR/LTMP 0.148 calculator WQS 12.2379 12.2379 Stream Std
36 Selenium 50 'Literature 0.005 calculator WQS 0.5990 0.5990 Stream Std
37 Silver 75 Literature 0.00006 calculator WQS 0.0144 0.0144 Stream Std
38 Zinc 55.91 DMR/LTMP 0.501 calculator WQS 68.0648 68.0648 Stream Std
39 Total Nitrogen _
40 Total Phos. 34.25 DMR/LTMP
41 Fluoride 20.02 DMR/LTMP 1.8 calculator WQS 134.8081 134.8081 Stream Std
42 Chloride 250
43 Oil&Grease
44
45
46
47
Modeled after:Chapter 5-HWA Guidance,Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: HWA AT 2020 Master; Worksheet Name: HWA Page2of5
Printed 6/24/2020,1:30 PM
_ A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H I I IJIK
49 Average Influent NH3(mg/I)
50 Average Anaerobic Digester NH3(mg/1)
51 Inhibition Loading Calculations only enter when have ANAEROBIC digester
A.S./Nit/I.k. Digestor Minimum Minimum
Primary Primary A.S./Nit,/T.F. Inhibition A.S./Nit/L.F. Inhibition Digestor Inhibition Inhibition
Removal Rate Removal Rate Inhibition Concentration Inhibition Concentration Inhibition Digestor Inhibition Loading Loading
52 Pollutant (%) Source Concentration(mg/I) Source Loading(lbs/day) (mg/I) Conc.Source Loading(lbs/day) (lbs/day) Source
53 BOD
54 TSS 1
55 Ammonia 480 LIT-AS 27630.9759 27630.98 AS/Nit/TF ir
56 Arsenic 0.1 LIT-AS 5.7565 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF it
57 Cadmium 1 LIT-AS 57.5645 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF it
58 Chromium 0.394 LIT-NIT 22.6804 22.6804 AS/Nit./TF it
59 Copper 0.48 LIT-NIT 27.6310 27.6310 AS/Nit/IF it
60 Cyanide 0.1 LIT-AS 5.7565 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF ir
61 Lead 0.5 LIT-NIT 28.7823 28.7823 AS/Nit/TF it
62 Mercury 0.1 LIT-AS 5.7565 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF in
63 Molybdenum
64 Nickel 0.25 LIT-NIT 14.3911 r 14.3911 AS/Nit/TF in
65 Selenium
66 Silver 0.25 LIT-AS 14.3911 14.3911 AS/Nit/TF it
67 Zinc I LIT-NIT 57.5645 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF in
68 Total Nitrogen
69 Total Phos.
70 Fluoride
71 Chloride
72 Oil&Grease
73 0.0000 _
74 0.0000
75 0.0000
76 0.0000
Modeled after:Chapter 5-HWA Guidance,Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: HWA AT 2020 Master; Worksheet Name: HWA Page 3 of 5
Printed 6/24/2020,1:30 PM
A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H i I IJIK
77
7r Sludge Loading Calculations
Class A Limits Class A Limits Class A Limits Minimum Minimum
Sludge Ceiling Sludge Ceiling Sludge Ceiling Load Cumulative Sludge Cumulative Monthly Monthly Avg. Mon.Avg.Load. - Sludge Sludge
Concentration Limit Load -HASL Cale.- Rate Limit Sludge Loading Average Rate Loading HASL Cak.- Loading Loading
79 Pollutant (mg/kg) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (Ibs/(acre*life)) (lbs/day) Limit(mg/kg) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) Sorce
80 BOD
81 TSS
82 Ammonia
83 Arsenic 75 1.4720_ 36 1.4488 41 1.4488 Cumul.Sludl
84 Cadmium 85 1.1205 34 0.9190 39 0.9190 Cumul.Sludl
85 Chromium
86 Copper 4300 47.3486 1338 30.2103 1500 30.2103 Cumul.Sludl
87 Cyanide
88 Lead 840 12.1623 267 7.9270 300 7.9270 Cumul.Sludl
89 Mercury 57 0.5107 15 0.2756 17 0.2756 Cumul.Sludi
90 Molybdenum 75 2.0073 2.0073 Sludge Ceilit
91 Nickel 420 13.4598 374 24.5765 420 13.4598 Sludge Ceilit
92 Selenium 100 1.7664 89 3.2236 100 1.7664 Sludge Ceilit
93 Silver
94 Zinc 7500 118.4784 2498 80.9151 2800 80.9151 Cumul.Slud
95 Total Nitrogen
96 Total Phos.
97 Fluoride
98 Chloride
99 Oil&Grease
100 0.0000
101 0.0000
102 0.0000
103 0.0000
104
Modeled after:Chapter 5-HWA Guidance,Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: HWA AT 2020 Master; Worksheet Name: HWA Page4of5
Printed 6/24/2020,1:30 PM
A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H I I I J I K
105 Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading Calculations
Minimum Pass Minimum Minimum Allowable Maximum Allowable
Through Loading Pass Through Minimum Inhibition Inhibition Loading Minimum Sludge Sludge Loading Headworks Headworks Loading
106 (lbs/day) Source Loading(lbs/day) Source Loading(lbs/day) Sorce Loading(lbs/day) Source
107 BOD 21857 Design 21857.5 Design
108 TSS 20817 Design 20816.6 Design
109 Ammonia 2203 Design 27630.9759 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 2203.1 Design
110 Arsenic 1.0891 Stream Std 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 1.4488 Cumul.Sludge Loading 1.0891 Stream Std
111 Cadmium 0.3630 Stream Std 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 0.9190 Cumul.Sludge Loading 0.3630 Stream Std
112 Chromium 3.6605 Stream Std 22.6804 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti I 3.6605 Stream Std
113 Copper 9.6251 Stream Std 27.6310 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 30.2103 Cumul.Sludge Loading 9.6251 Stream Std
114 Cyanide 0.9470 NPDES 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti I 0.9470 NPDES
115 Lead 2.7492 Stream Std 28.7823 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 7.9270 Cumul.Sludge Loading 2.7492 Stream Std
116 Mercury 0.05027 Stream Std 5.7565 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 0.2756 Cumul.Sludge Loading 0.05027 Stream Std
117 Molybdenum 2.0073 Sludge Ceiling 2.0073 Sludge Ceiling
118 Nickel 12.2379 Stream Std 14.3911 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 13.4598•Sludge Ceiling 12.2379 Stream Std
119 Selenium 0.5990 Stream Std 1.7664 Sludge Ceiling 0.5990 Stream Std
120 Silver 0.0144 Stream Std 14.3911 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 0.0144 Stream Std
121 Zinc 68.0648 Stream Std 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF inhibiti 80.9151 Cumul.Sludge Loading 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF inhibition
122 Total Nitrogen
123 Total Phos.
124 Fluoride 134.8 Stream Std 134.8081 Stream Std
125 Chloride
126 Oil&Grease
127 0
128 0
129 0
130 0
131
Modeled after:Chapter 5-HWA Guidance,Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name: HWA AT 2020 Master; Worksheet Name: HWA Page5of5
Printed 6124/2020,1:30 PM
A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H I I I J I K
1132
133 Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings Calculations
wlaxuumn Irld1W1U111
Allowable Uncontrollable Allowable
Headworks Loading Check to Use HASL Concentration Uncontrollable Uncontrollable Industrial Load Design vs.Pass-
134 Pollutant (lbs/day) MAHL Basis Calcs (x) (mg/I) Source Load(lbs/day) (lbs/day) Thru Warning
135 BOD 21857 Design 205 uncont sampling. 6698.4336 15159
136 TSS 20817 Design 312 uncont mass bal 10194.6892 10622
137 Ammonia 2203 Design 23.68 uncont sampling 773.7508 1429
138 Arsenic 1.0891 Stream Std 0.001 uncont sampling 0.0327 1.0564
139 Cadmium 0.3630 Stream Std 0.00025 uncont sampling 0.0082 0.3549
140 Chromium 3.6605 Stream Std N/A 0.0068 uncont mass bal 0.2222 3.4383
141 Copper 9.6251 Stream Std 0.041 uncont mass bal 1.3397 8.2854
142 Cyanide 0.9470 NPDES N/A 0.0077 uncont mass bal 0.2516 0.6954
143 Lead 2.7492 Stream Std 0.0024 uncont mass bal 0.0784 2.6708
144 Mercury 0.05027 Stream Std 0.0000875 uncont sampling 0.00286 0.04741
145 Molybdenum 2.0073 Sludge Ceiling 0.005 uncont sampling 0.1634 1.8439
146 Nickel 12.2379 Stream Std 0.0112 uncont mass bal 0.3660 11.8720
147 Selenium 0.5990 Stream Std 0.002717 uncont sampling, 0.0888 0.5102
148 Silver 0.0144 Stream Std N/A 0 uncont sampling 0.0000 0.0144
149 Zinc 57.5645 AS/Nit/TF inhibition 0.2311 uncont mass bal 7.5513 50.0133
150 Total Nitrogen
151 Total Phos.
152 Fluoride 134.8081 Stream Std 1.2596 uncont mass bal 41.1578 93.6503
153 Chloride
154 Oil&Grease 23.1804 uncont mass bal 757.4262
155 0
156 0
157 0
158 0
Modeled after:Chapter 5-HWA Guidance,Appendix 5-A
Revision Date: February 2008

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed:6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 1 of 6
Allocation Table Spreadsheet Instructions:
Headworks last approved: 1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is protected,password is"2".
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20 2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 6,Section C.
3)HWA and AT worksheets in this workbook are linked. Pollutant Names,MAHLs,Basis,and Uncontrollable load in this AT
Permits last modified: 07/01/20 worksheet are automatically entered from the HWA spreadsheet. This includes pollutant names in columns AT through BK.
POTw=> City of Monroe
NPDESfr=> NC0024333
FLOW BOD TSS 1
Industry Type Renewal Modification Date Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe of Effective Effective Permit Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (ncsc list s1pnebeicty) number number Industry Date Date Expires MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001 CFR 471 05/03/19 07/01/20 06/30/22
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002 CFR 471 05/03/19 07/01/20 06/30/22 0.1240 124,000 310.00 310.00
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'l CM-30 01,02 CFR 471 07/01/20 06/30/23 0.0623 62,300
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001 hospital 07/01/18 04/12/19 06/30/21 0.0900 90,000 221.00 144.00
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001 plastic pipe(463) 07/01/19 06/30/22 0.0500 50,000
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001 food 08/12/19 06/30/22 0.0400 40,000 240.00 80.00
6 ELG Utica Alloys CM-34 0001 CFR 433 07/01/20 06/30/23 0.0050 5,000 monitor monitor
7 GM Nameplate02 CM-20 0002 CFR 433 07/01/20 06/30/23 0.0200 20,000 47.00 42.00
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 CFR 439 07/01/18 12/17/18 06/30/21 0.0170 17,000 monitor monitor
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002 chem blend 07/01/19 06/30/22 0.0300 30,000 65.00 50.00
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 Biogas/Power 03/02/20 06/30/21 0.0250 25,000 52.00 41.00
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001 CFR 433-door closers 07/01/19 06/30/22 0.0100 10,000 30.00 30.00
12 ORO Manufacturing company CM-25 0001 CFR 433 07/01/19 06/30/22 0.0040 4,000
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001 chicken 07/01/18 06/30/21 0.9500 950,000 1980.00 1585.00
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001 chicken 07/01/20 06/30/23 2.1000 2,100,000 5004.00� -
3750.00
Column Totals=> 3.5273 3,527,3001 79491 6032
Basis=> NPDES Design Design
MAHL from HWA(lbs/day)=> NPDES Permitted Flow=> 10.4000 21857 20817
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 6698 10195
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)_> 6.4821 15159 10622
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)=> 3.5273 7949 6032
MAIL left(lbs/day)=> 2.9548 7210 4590
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)=> 45.6% 47.6% 43.2%
Percent MAHL still available(%)=> 28.4% 33.0% 22.0%
5 Percent MAHL(lbs/day)=> 0.5200 1093 1041
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed:6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 2 of 6
1 Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20
Permits last modified: 07/01/20
POTw=> City of Monroe
NPDEs4K> NC0024333
Ammonia Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Cyanide
Industry Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please 1st alphabencly) number number mg/1 lbs/day mg/I lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/I lbs/day mg/I lbs/day mg/I lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001 70.00 0.1800 0.1400
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002 24.00 0.1900 0.2600 0.0500
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'l CM-30 01,02 11.00 5.72 0.2800 0.1455 monitor0.0200 0.0104
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001 15.00 0.0690 0.0740 0.0080
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001 , 0.001250 monitor 0.1100
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001 5.00
.
6 ELG Utica Alloys CM-34 0001 120.00 5.00 0.0030 0.0001 1.5000 0.0626 1.5000 0.0626 0.5000 0.0209
7 GM Nameplate02 CM-20 0002 8.00 0.0030 0.0005 0.5000 0.0834 0.5000 0.0834 0.2000 0.0334
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 monitor monitor monitor _monitor monitor
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002 4.00 I 0.0500 0.0060
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 4.00 monitor monitor monitor
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001 1.80 0.0030 0.0003 1.5000 0.1251 1.5000 0.1251 0.5000 0.0417
12 ORO Manufacturing company CM-25 0001 0.0030 0.0001 1.5000 0.0500 1.5000 0.0500 0.3000 0.0100
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001 730.00 �� 0.0400
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001 550.00 monitor monitor
Column Totals=> 1353 0.00001 0.0022 l 0.72561 0.8151 0.2203
Basis=> Design Stream Std Stream Std Stream Std Stream Std NPDES
MAHL from HWA(lbs/day)=> 2203.09 1.0891 0.3630 3.6605 9.6251 0.9470
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=> 773.75 0.0327 0.0082 0.2222 1.3397 0.2516
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)=> 1429.34 1.0564 0.3549 3.4383 8.2854 0.6954
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)=> 1352.52 0.0000 0.0022 0.7256 0.8151 0.2203
MAIL left(lbs/day)=> 76.82 1.0564 0.3526 2.7128 7.4703 0.4751
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)=> 5.4% 100.0% 99.4% 78.9% 90.2% 68.3%
Percent MAHL still available(%)=> 3.5% 97.0% 97.1 % 74.1 % 77.6% 50.2%
5 Percent MAHL(lbs/day)=> 110.15 0.0545 0.0182 0.1830 0.4813 0.0474
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed:6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 3 of 6
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20
Permits last modified: 07/01/20
POTw=> City of Monroe
NPDES#=, NC0024333
Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver
Industry Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits _
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabeicly) number number mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day ( mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001 0.1500 ( 0.4300
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002 I 0.1000 I monitor 0.4400
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'! CM-30 01,02 I 0.0400 0.0208 monitor 0.6000 0.3117
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001 monitor 0.4300
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001 0.0370 _ monitor monitor
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001 monitor
6 ELG Utica Alloys CM-34 0001 0.2000 0.0083 2.3800 0.0992 0.2000 0.0083
11
7 GM Nameplate02 CM-20 0002 0.0500 0.0083 0.5000 0.0834 0.1800 0.0300
_
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 monitor monitor monitor
i i-
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 monitor_
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001 0.2000 0.0167 2.3800 0.1985 0.2000 0.0167
1.0000
12 ORO Manufacturing company CM-25 0001 0.2000 0.0067 0.0334 0.2000 0.0067
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001 monitor 1 -
Column Totals=> 0.19781 10.000000 0.0000 1.1662 0.0000� 0.4917
Sludge
Basis=> Stream Std Stream Std Ceiling Stream Std Stream Std Stream Std
MAHL from HWA(lbs/day)=> 2.7492 0.050266 2.0073 12.2379 0.5990 0.0144
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=> 0.0784 0.002859 0.1634 0.3660 0.0888 0.0000
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)=> 2.6708 0.047406 1.8439 11.8720 0.5102 0.0144
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)=> 0.1978 0.000000 0.0000 1.1662 0.0000 0.4917
MAIL left(lbs/day)=> 2.4730 0.047406 1.8439 10.7057 0.5102 -0.4773
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)=> _ 92.6% 100.0% 100.0% 90.2% 100.0% -3320.4%
Percent MAHL still available(%)=> 90.0% 94.3% 91.9% 87.5% 85.2% -3320.4%
5 Percent MAHL(Ibs/day)=> 0.1375 0.002513 0.1004 0.6119 0.0299 0.0007
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed: 6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 4 of 6
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20
Permits last modified: 07/01/20
Porw=> City of Monroe
NPDEStk> NC0024333
Zinc TKN Aluminum Fluoride Chloride Oil& Grease
Industry Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please listalphabeticly) number number mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001 0.7200 35.0000
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002 0.3000_ monitor I
I
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'l CM-30 01,02 0.1200 0.0623 monitor 50.0000 25.9791
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001 0.8000INIMINI _
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001 0.4100 _
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001 monitor monitor 50.0000 16.6800
6 ELG Utica Alloys CM-34 0001 1.4800 0.0617 monitor 15.0000 0.6255 monitor
7 GM Nameplate02 CM-20 0002 0.5000 0.0834 monitor /
ii
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 monitor �� monitor
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002 0.0700
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 monitor 75.0000 15.6375 monitor
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001 1.4800 0.1234 monitor
12 ORO Manufacturing company CM-25 0001 1.4800 0.0494 monitor monitor
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001 monitor 50.0000 396.1500
I
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001 monitor monitor 1 30.0000 525.4200
Column Totals=> I 1.9603 0.00 I 0.00 26.6046 15.63751 I 938.2500
AS/Nit/TF
Basis=> inhibition Stream Std
MAHL from HWA(lbs/day)=> 57.5645 134.8081
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=> 7.5513 _ 41.1578 757.4262
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)=> 50.0133 93.6503
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)_> 1.9603 0.00 0.00 26.6046 15.6375 938.2500
MAIL left(lbs/day)=> 48.0530 _ 67.0457
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)=> 96.1 % IIIIII1/1///f #VALUE! 71.6% INIIIIIIIIIIt #VALUE!
Percent MAHL still available(%)=> 83.5% I/Illllllllllf #VALUE! 49.7% INIIII/INIIt #VALUE!
5 Percent MAHL(lbs/day)_> 2.8782 6.7404
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed:6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 5 of 6
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20
Permits last modified: 07/01/20
Pores=, City of Monroe
NPDES#' NC0024333
TTO Acetone n-Amylacetate Ethyl acetate Isopropyl acetate
Industry Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits Permit Limits
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabcticly) number number mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001 2.1300_ i .
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002 _
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'l CM-30 01,02 2.1300 1.1067
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001 1
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001
- _
6 ELG Utica Alloys - CM-34 0001 2.1300 0.0888_
7 GM Nameplate02 - CM-20 0002 1.5000 0.2502
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 8.2000 1.1626 8.2000 1.1626 8.2000 1.1626 8.2000 1.1626
-
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002 _
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 _
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001 2.1300 0.1776 _
12 ORO Manufacturing company - CM-25 0001 2.1300 0.071111
_
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001
Column Totals=> 1 1.6944 1.1626 1.1626 1.1626 1.1626
Basis=>
MARL from HWA(lbs/day)=>
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=>
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)=>
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)=> 1.6944 1.1626 1.1626 1.1626 1.1626
MAIL left(lbs/day)=>
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)_> lllllllllllllt #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE!
Percent MAHL still available(%)=> lNt/Illlllllt #VALUE! #VALUE! #VALUE! N #VALUE!
•
5 Percent MAHL(lbs/day)=> .
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Workbook Name : HWA AT 2020 Master, Worksheet Name: AT Printed:6/24/2020, 1:31 PM
Page 6 of 6
Allocation Table
Headworks last approved:
Allocation Table updated: 06/16/20
Permits last modified: 07/01/20
POTw=> City of Monroe
NPDES > NC0024333
Methylene Chloride Total Phosphorus
Industry Permit Limits Permit Limits
IUP INDUSTRY NAMES Permit Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabeticly) number number mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
1 ATI Allvac 01 CM-15 0001
ATI Allvac 02 CM-15 0002
2 Allvac Bakers/Specialty Mat'I CM-30 01,02
3 Atrium-Union CM-14 0001
4 Charlotte Pipe&Foundry Co.Plas CM-29 0001
5 Duke Sandwich Productions CM-36 0001
6 ELG Utica Alloys CM-34 0001
7 GM Nameplate02 CM-20 0002
8 Glenmark Phamaceutical USA CM33 0001 0.7000 0.0992_
9 Goulston Company CM-01 0002
10 NC Biogas CM-35 0001 5.0000 1.0425
11 Norton Door Controls CM-16 0001
12 ORO Manufacturing company CM-25 0001
13 Pilgrims Pride Corporation CM-28 0001
14 Tyson Farms CM-11 0001
Column Totals=> 0.0992 1.0425
Basis=>
MAHL from HWA(lbs/day)=>
Uncontrollable Loading(lbs/day)=>
Total Allowable for Industry(MAIL)(lbs/day)_>
Total Permitted to Industry(lbs/day)=> 0.0992 1.0425
MAIL left(lbs/day)=>
Percent Allow.Ind.(MAIL)still available(%)=> #VALUE! #VALUE!
Percent MARL still available(%)=> #VALUE! #VALUE!
•
5 Percent MAHL(lbs/day)=>
HWA.AT
Revised:May 2014

Plant Design From H&S for Ammonia
Parameter Capacity
10.4 mgd
Flow, mgd
BOD removed, mg/I 252
BOD removed, lb/day 21,857
02 required@1.2 lb 02/lb BOD removed, lb/day 26,229
TKN removed by oxidation, mg/I 52
TKN removed by oxidation, lb/day 4,510
02 required@4.6 lb 02/lb TKN removed,lb/day 20,747
Ammonia removed, lb/day 2,706 2,200
Total 02 required,lb/day 46,976
Conversion factor for standard conditions 1.716
Total 02 required at standard conditions, lb/day 80,611
Scfm required @ 100%transfer efficiency 2,655
Transfer efficiency,% 17
Scfm required 15,618
Number of diffusers required 7,809
Blower Capacity= 3@ 7,885 scfm ea.= 23,655 scfm
Firm Capacity, scfm= 15,770 scfm
lbs/day actual
Oxygen Required for AS Treatment: lbs/day 02 factor Conditions
BOD 21,857 1.2 26228.4
NH3-n 2,200 4.6 10120
36348.4
Conversion Actual to Std Conditions 1.716 62,374 lbs/day 02 std condition
Conversion 02 lbs/day to scfm, 100% eff 0.04 2,495 scfm air flow
Transfer efficiency, % 17.00% 14,676 scfm air flow

UNCONT LTMP 2nd 2017-1st 2020
UNCONT. LIMP 2nd 1/4 2017- 1st 1/4 2020
Detection 2.0 0.1 2.5 0.0001 0.005 0.001' 0.01
Date Flow <?BOD mall SOD Ibs <? NH3 mg/I NH3 Ibs <?TSS mg/I TSS Ibs <?Cd mg/1 1 Cd Ibs <7 Cr mgll Cr Ibs <?Cu mg/1 Cu Ibs <?'Cn mgll 'Cs Ibs <?
6/6/2017 160 12 72 0.00025 0.0025 0.013 0.010 _
8/15/2017 200 24 88 0.00025 0.0025 0.018 0.005
11/14/2017 200 31 98 0.00025 I 0.0025 0.018 0.005
2/13/2018 130 8.7 67 0.00025 0.0025 0.012 0.005_
5/8/2018 320 36 110 0.00025 0.0025 0.016 0.005
7/17/2018 380 44 140 0.00025 0.0025 0.022 0.005
10/16/2018 210 29 76 0.00025 0.0025 0.016 0.013
3/5/2019 80 7.5 41 0.00025 0.0025 0.015 0.005
5/14/2019 92 1 10 45 0.00025 0.0025 j 0.011 0.005
8/13/2019 370 ' 45 150 0.00025 0.0025 0.024 0.005
11/19/2019 _ 140 16 65 0.00025 0.0025 1 0.013 0.005
3/10/2020 180 ' 21 70 0.00025 0.0025 0.012 0.005
AVERAGE #DIV/0! IN 205.1667 #DIV/0! ## 23.68333 #DIV/0! ## 85.16667 #DIV/0! ## 0.00025 #DIV/0! ## 0.0025 #DIV/0! ## 0.015833 #DIV/0! ## 0.006083 #DIV/0! ##
MINIMUM 0 0 80 0 0 7.5 0 0 41 0 0 0.00025 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0.011 0 0 0.005 0 0
MAXIMUM 0 0 380 0 0 45 0 0 150 0 0 0.00025 0 0 0.0025 0 0 0.024 0 0 0.013 0 0
Page 1

UNCONT LTMP 2nd 2017-1st 2020
0.001 0.0001 0.005 0.001 0.01 0.002 5 0.01 0.001
Pb mg/I 'Pb lbs <? Hg mg/I Hg lbs <? NI mgll ,NI lbs <?Ag mgll Ag Ills <?Zn mgll Zn lbs As mg/I As lbs. O&G O&Glbs. pH Mo mgll Mo lbs. Se mgll
0.0005 0.00005 0.0025 ' 0.0005 0.130 0.001 , 26 6.7 0.005 0.0025
0.0011 0.00005 0.0025 0.0005 0.190 0.001 46 7.1 0.005 0.0025
0.0005 0.00005 0.0025 0.0005 _ 0.240 0.001 47 7.1 0.005 j 0.0025
0.0005 1 0.0001 0.0025 0.0005 0.180 0.001 6.6 7.0 0.005 0.0025
0.0005 i 0.0001 0.0057 0.0005 0.240 0.001 39 7.1 0.005 0.0051
0.0005 0.0001 0.0054 0.0005 0.230 0.001 42 6.3 0.005 0.0025
0.0005 0.0001 0.0025 0.0005 0.110 0.001 24 7.5 0.005 0.0025
0.001 0.0001 0.0020 0.0005 0.054 0.001 11 7.5 0.005 ' 0.0025
0.001 0.0001 0.0032 0.0005 0.056 0.001 100 7.1 0.005 0.0025
0.001 0.0001 0.0048 0.0005 0.250 0.001 55 6.4 0.005 _ 0.0025
0.001 0.0001 0.0043 0.0005 0.120 0.001 60 7.3 0.005 ', 0.0025
:_
0.001 i 0.0001 0.0032 0.0005 0.160 0.001 , 26 7.4 0.005 0.0025
0.000758 #DIV/O! rJ 0.0000875 #DIV/01 ## 0.003425 #DIV/0! ## 0.0005 #DIV/0! ## 0.163333 #DIV/0! 0.001 #DIV/0! 40.21667 #DIV/0! 0.005 #DIV/0! 0.002717
0.0005 0 0 0.00005 0 0 0.002 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0.054 0 0.001 0 6.6 0 6.3 0.005 0 0.0025
0.00111 0 0 0.0001 0 0 0.0057 0 0 0.0005 0 0 0.25 0 0.001 _ 0 100 0 7.5 0.005 0 0.0051
Page 2

UNCONT LTMP 2nd 2017-1st 2020
1
0.1 0.02 0.5 0.001 0.10 0.05 0.04
Chloride �F mg/1 'Phenols TKNmg/I IVinchior T-phos MBAS AL
1.6 20 2.8 0.610
0.05 34 3.4 0.850
0.31 - 45 5.6 0.440
0.28 25 2.8 - 0.560
0.61 52 5.3 0.230
0.43 52 . 4.8 0.300
0.13 41 I 4.6 0.360
0.05 19 1.8 0.680
0.28 16 2.0 1 0.480
0.47 _ 66 6.6 0.500
0.05 24 i 3.3 0.890
0.25 33 4.5 0.370
#DIV/01 0.375833 #DIV/0! 35.58333 #DIV/0! 3.958333 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.5225
0 0.05 0 16 0 1.8 0 0 0.23
0 1.6 0 66 0 6.6 0 0 0.89
Page 3

Removal Rate Calculations
FLOW BO
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date mgd < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < m L Calculation
5/2017 DMR Spreadsheet 7 264.32 264.32 4.65 4.65 191.91 191.91 5.54 5.54
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 1) DataInstructions: 7.25 228.09 228.09 3.85 3.85 196 196 5.31 5.31
7/2017 DMR entered only 5.46 206.05 206.05 1.01 1.01 181.65 181.65 1.63 1.63
in Heavy
8/2017 DMR/LTMP Bordered 5.32 236.52 236.52 1.9 1.9 286.43 286.43 1.17 1.17
cells. Rest of
ik
9/2017 DMR worksheet is 5.42 250.9 250.9 1.42 1.42 235 235 1 0.17
10/2017 DMR protected, 4.98 256.55 256.55 1.59 1.59 246.36 '. • 1.11
password is
11/2017 DMR/LTMP "2 4.56 295.53 295.53 1.53 1.53 239.47 239.47 1 0.22
12/2017 DMR 2) For below 5.06 321.72 321.72 1.83 1.83 236.44 236.44 0.46 0.46
1/2018 DMR detection 6.65 257.62 257.62 4.63 4.63 232.95 5.1
data,enter"<" i_
2/2018 DMR/LTMP in"<"column, 7.18 282.32 282.32 4.72 4.72 232.63 232.63 4.75 4.75
and enter
3/2018 DMR detection level 7.54 225.14 225.14 4.62 4.62 176.38 176.38 4.79 4.79
4/2018 DMR n Influent or 6.92 234.38 234.38 5.32 5.32 182 182 4.52 4.52
Effluent mg/1
5/2018 DMR/LTMP columns. 5.73 269.91 269.91 2.35 2.35 231.73 231.73 1.6 1.6
Spreadsheet
6/2018 DMR will auto- 5.37 242.29 242.29 1.22 1.22 242.1 242.1 0.38 0.38
7/2018 DMR/LTMP maticauy 4.99 245 245 1.86 1.86 234.67 1. 2.06
.. calculate
8/2018 DMR averages and 5.44 231.61 231.61 0.98 0.98 239.91 239.91 1.09 1.09
removal rates
9/2018 DMR using 1/2 7.15 230.53 230.53 3.04 3.04 201.16 201.16 7.31 7.31
10/2018 DMR/LTMP value entered. 7.31 265.04 265.04 3.45 3.45 172.78 172.78 4.17 4.17
11/2018 DMR 3)Document 9.69 157.78 157.78 3.75 3.75 167.22 167.22 6.38 6.38
12/2018 DMR choice removal Rate 12.52 143.17 143.17 4.15 4.15 128.78 128.78 6.6 6.6
1/2019 DMR 4)Formulas in 10.14 171.71 171.71 4.27 4.27 149.71 149.71 4.2 4.2
2/2019 DMR Compre- 9.5 227.65 227.65 7.37 7.37 186.5 186.5 9.09 9.09
hensive Guide
3/2019DMR/LTMP HWA Chapter, 9.09 191.19 191.19 4.61 4.61 160.19 160.19 4.31 4.31
4/2019 DMR section E, 8.33 237.05 237.05 6.8 6.8 184.48 184.48 9.09 9.09
page 1.
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 6.31 252.23 252.23 3.38 3.38 220.91 220.91 3.92 3.92
6/2019 DMR 5.35 233 233 2.4 2.4 207.8 207.8 3.99 3.99
7/2019 DMR 4.93 242.86 242.86 2.5 2.5 195.36 195.36 2.6 2.6
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 5.86 221 221 2.63 2.63 232 232 4.76 4.76
9/2019 DMR 4.67 266.75 266.75 3.1 3.1 248.1 248.1 4.18 4.18
10/2019 DMR 5.06 279.96 279.96 3.88 3.88 255.22 255.22 5.73 5.73
11/2019 DMR/LTMP 5.46 231.94 231.94 5.41 5.41 205.65 205.65 9.72 9.72
12/2019 DMR 8.56 220.32 220.32 4.89 4.89 180.42 180.42 6.12 6.12
1/2020 DMR 9.31 182.1 182.1 6.94 6.94 149.9 149.9 8.66 8.66
2/2020 DMR 10.22 198.7 198.7 7.45 7.45 168.1 168.1 8.47 8.47
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 7.46 237.77 237.77 9.6 9.6 191.82 191.82 11.85 11.85
4/2020 DMR 6.69 243.33 243.33 6.8 6.8 199.14 199.14 8.44 8.44
Column Averages=> 6.902222 235.6119 3.886111 205.3019 4.708056
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 98.35% Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 97.71 %
Literature/Default RR=>� Literature/Default RR=>
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 0 %of data is BDL 0 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=> 98.35% RR for this HWA=> 97.71 %
Page 1 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
AMMO IA CADMIUM
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR 28.32 28.32 < 1 0.5
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 26.5 26.5 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
7/2017 DMR 25.25 25.25 < 1 0.5
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 28.26 28.26 < 1 0.5 0.002 0.002 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
9/2017 DMR 28.25 28.25 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025
10/2017 DMR 31.36 31.36 < 1 0.5
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 34.21 34.21 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
12/2017 DMR 33.78 33.78 < 1 0.5
1/2018 DMR 29.26 29.26 < 1 0.5 _
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 29.79 29.79 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
3/2018 DMR 25.71 25.71 < 1 0.5 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.0001 0.00005
4/2018 DMR 23.76 23.76 < 1 0.5 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.0001 0.00005
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 31.73 31.73 < 1 0.5 < 0.002_ 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
6/2018 DMR 29.38 29.38 < 1 0.5
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 29.86 29.86 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002_ 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
8/2018 DMR 32.39 32.39 < 1 0.5
9/2018 DMR 28.94 28.94 < 1 0.5
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 27.26 27.26 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
11/2018 DMR 17.81 17.81 < 1 0.5
12/2018 DMR 15.21 15.21 < 1 0.5
1/2019 DMR 17.7 17.7 < I 0.5
2/2019 DMR 20.63 20.63 < 1 0.5
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 20.5 20.5 < 1 0.5 < 0.002_ 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
4/2019 DMR 24.29 24.29 < 1 0.5
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 29.95 29.95 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
6/2019 DMR 31.6 31.6 < 1 0.5
7/2019 DMR 30.91 30.91 < 1 0.5 _
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 31.77, 31.77 < 1 0.5 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
9/2019 DMR 35.25 35.25 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025
10/2019 DMR 32.83 32.83 < 1 0.5
11/2019 DMR/LTMP 29.12 29.12 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
12/2019 DMR _ 20.42 20.42 < 1 0.5
1/2020 DMR 18.3 18.3 < 1 0.5
2/2020 DMR 17.3 17.3 < 1 0.5
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 20.32 20.32 < 1 0.5 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0005 0.00025 < 0.0005 0.00025
4/2020 DMR 20.99 20.99 < 1 0.5
Column Averages=> 26.63639 0.5 0.0011 0.0012 0.0003 0.0002
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 98.12% Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDI
Literature/Default RR=>II Literature/Default RR=> 45.00% Literature/Default RR=> 67.00%
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 50 % of data is BDL 96 % of data is BDL 100 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=> 98.12% RR for this HWA=> 45.00% RR for this HWA=> 67.00%
Page 2 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR 0.0066 0.0066 0.003 0.003 0.00157 0.00157
6/2017 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.023 0.023 0.0061 0.0061 0.005 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
7/2017 DMR 0.0061 0.0061 < 0.01 0.005 0.0055 0.0055
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.0053 0.0053 < 0.005 0.0025 0.038 0.038 0.00665 0.00665 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
9/2017 DMR < 0.005 0.0025 0.00582 0.00582 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
10/2017 DMR 0.007 0.007 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.009 0.009 < 0.005 0.0025 0.039 0.039 0.0044 0.0044 < 0.01 0.005 0.63 0.63
12/2017 DMR 0.0039 0.0039 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
1/2018 DMR 0.0033 0.0033 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.0055 0.0055 < 0.005 0.0025 0.045 0.045 0.0044 0.0044 < 0.01 0.005 0.00125 0.00125
3/2018 DMR < 0.005 0.0025 0.00758 0.00758 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
4/2018 DMR < 0.005 0.0025 0.0058 0.0058 < 0.01 0.005 0.52 0.52
5/2018 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.027 0.027 0.00575 0.00575 < 0.01 0.005 0.00186 0.00186
6/2018 DMR 0.00693 0.00693 < 0.01 0.005 0.00109 0.00109
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.006 0.006 < 0.005 0.0025 0.033 0.033 0.0066 0.0066 0.00275 0.00275 0.00105 0.00105
8/2018 DMR 0.007 0.007 < 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.001
9/2018 DMR 0.00743 0.00743 < 0.01 0.005 0.00058 0.00058
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.005 0.005 < 0.005 0.0025 0.026 0.026 0.00745 0.00745 < 0.01 0.005 0.00057 0.00057
11/2018 DMR 0.0058 0.0058 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
12/2018 DMR 0.00823 0.00823 < 0.01 0.005 0.00183 0.00183
1/2019 DMR 0.0072 0.0072 < 0.01 0.005 0.0018 0.0018
2/2019 DMR 0.0098 0.0098 < 0.01 0.005 0.0029 0.0029
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.0052 0.0052 < 0.005 0.0025 0.021 0.021 0.00595 0.00595 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
4/2019 DMR 0.0069 0.0069 < 0.01 0.005 0.00214 0.00214
5/2019 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.057 0.057 0.0058 0.0058 < 0.01 0.005 0.00023 0.00023
6/2019 DMR 0.0079 0.0079 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
7/2019 DMR 0.0087 0.0087 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
8/2019 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.042 0.042 0.0072 0.0072 < 0.01 0.005 0.00055 0.00055
9/2019 DMR < 0.005 0.0025 0.0058 0.0058 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
10/2019 DMR 0.007 0.007 0.0026 0.0026 < 0.01 0.005
11/2019 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.03 0.03 0.00725 0.00725 0.0145 0.0145 0.00091 0.00091
12/2019 DMR 0.0058 0.0058 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
1/2020 DMR 0.0067 0.0067 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
2/2020 DMR 0.0077 0.0077 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
3/2020 DMR/LTMP < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 0.023 0.023 0.009125 0.009125 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
4/2020 DMR 0.0082 0.0082 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
Column Averages=> I 0.0043 I 0.0025 0.0337 0.0067 0.0051 0.0351
, Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 80.21 % Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDI
Literature/Default RR=> 82.00% Literature/Default RR=> 86.00% Literature/Default RR=> 69.00%
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 79 % of data is BDL 0 % of data is BDL 68 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=> 82.00% RR for this HWA=> 80.21 % RR for this HWA=> 69.00%
Page 3 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
LEAD MOLYBDENUM
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR
6/2017 DMR/LTMP < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0001 0.00005 0.000000888 0.000000888 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
7/2017 DMR
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.002 0.002 < 0.001 0.0005 0.00015 0.00015 0.00000291 0.00000291 0.013 0.013 0.011 0.011
9/2017 DMR < 0.001 0.0005 0.00000151 0.00000151
10/2017 DMR ,
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.0016 0.0016 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0001 0.00005 0.00000131 0.000001310 0.022 0.022 0.013 0.013
12/2017 DMR
1/2018 DMR
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.0016 0.0016 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.000000834 0.000000834 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
3/2018 DMR < 0.002 0.001 0.00000173 0.00000173
4/2018 DMR < 0.002 0.001 0.000000808 0.000000808
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.001 0.001 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0002 0.0001 < 0.0000005 0.00000025 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
6/2018 DMR
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.0014 0.0014 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.00000195 0.00000195 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.012
8/2018 DMR
9/2018 DMR
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.0011 0.0011 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.000000952 0.000000952 0.011 0.011 < 0.01 0.005
11/2018 DMR
12/2018 DMR
1/2019 DMR
2/2019 DMR
3/2019 DMR/LTMP < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.00000137 0.00000137 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
4/2019 DMR
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.0022 0.0022 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.000000737 0.000000737 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
6/2019 DMR
7/2019 DMR
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.0021 0.0021 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.00000162 0.00000162 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
9/2019 DMR < 0.002 0.001 0.000000947 0.000000947
10/2019 DMR
11/2019 DMR/LTMP < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.00000238 0.00000238 0.01 0.01 < 0.01 0.005
12/2019 DMR _
1/2020 DMR
2/2020 DMR
3/2020 DMR/LTMP < 0.002 0.001 < 0.002 0.001 < 0.0002 0.0001 0.00000169 0.000001690 < 0.01 0.005 < 0.01 0.005
4/2020 DMR
Column Averages=> 0.0014 0.0008 0.00010 0.00000 0.0085 0.0068
Unpaired Site Specific RR=>p 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 98.57% Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDI
Literature/Default RR=> 61.00% Literature/Default RR=> 60.00% Literature/Default RR=> 33.00%
removal-rate-May 2017-April 20261 % of data is BDL 43 % of data is BDL 67 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=> 61.00% RR for this HWA=> 98.57% RR for this HWA=> 33.00
Page 4 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.0079 0.0079 0.006 0.006 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
7/2017 DMR < 0.001 0.0005_
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.041 0.041_ 0.011 0.011 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
9/2017 DMR 0.008 0.008 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005
10/2017 DMR
< 0.001 0.0005
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.012 0.012 0.0078 0.0078 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
12/2017 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
1/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.011 0.011 0.0063 0.0063 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
3/2018 DMR 0.032 0.032 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005
4/2018 DMR < 0.01 0.005 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.0083 0.0083 0.0084 0.0084 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
6/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.012 0.012 0.0086 0.0086 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
8/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
9/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.011 0.011 0.0078 0.0078 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
11/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
12/2018 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
1/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
2/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.0079 0.0079 0.0055 0.0055 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
4/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.011 0.011 0.0064 0.0064 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
6/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
7/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.014 0.014 0.0099 0.0099 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
9/2019 DMR 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005
10/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
11/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.0094 0.0094 0.0073 0.0073 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
12/2019 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
1/2020 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
2/2020 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 0.0066 0.0066 0.0069 0.0069 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.005 0.0025 < 0.001 0.0005 < 0.001 0.0005
4/2020 DMR < 0.001 0.0005
Column Averages=> 0.0127 0.0092 0.0025 0.0025 0.0005 0.0005
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 27.56% Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDI
Literature/Default RR=> 42.00% Literature/Default RR=> 50.00% Literature/Default RR=> 75.00%
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 4 %of data is BDL 100 % of data is BDL 100 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA= 27.56% RR for this HWA=> 50.00% RR for this HWA=> 75.00%
Page 5 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
ZINC Oil&Grease
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/LCalculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L J Calculation
5/2017 DMR 0.067 0.067 2.25 < 0.5 0.25
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.12 0.12 0.0616 0.0616 9.9 9.9 2.175 3.4 3.4 0.526 0.526
7/2017 DMR 0.064 0.064 2.2 0.5 0.5
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.19 0.19 0.073 0.073 35 35 2.2 0.56 0.56 0.595 0.595
9/2017 DMR 0.0605 0.0605 2.15 0.64 0.64
10/2017 DMR 0.079 0.079 2.35 0.81 0.81
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.2 0.2 0.077 0.077 26 26 2.2 1.1 1.1 0.895 0.895
12/2017 DMR 0.098 0.098 2.3 0.88 0.88
1/2018 DMR 0.093 0.093 2.25 0.84 0.84
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.23 0.23 0.0855 0.0855 16 16 2.2 0.4 0.4 0.615 0.615
3/2018 DMR 0.088 0.088 4.4 2.2 0.748 0.748
4/2018 DMR 0.079 0.079 4.5 2.25 0.95 0.95
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.18 0.18 0.0915 0.0915 5.9 0.79 0.79 0.96 0.96
6/2018 DMR 0.05967 0.05967 0.61 0.61
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.17 0.17 0.0735 0.0735 10 10 0.72 0.72 0.905 0.905
8/2018 DMR 0.055 0.055 0.73 0.73
9/2018 DMR 0.0703 0.0703 1.05 1.05
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.12 0.12 0.055 0.055 13 0.3 0.3 0.675 0.675
11/2018 DMR 0.048 0.0481 ® 0.35 0.35
12/2018 DMR 0.05733 0.05733 0.
0.5 0.5
1/2019 DMR 0.041 0.041 0.26 0.26
2/2019 DMR 0.062 0.062 0.62 0.62
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.07 0.07 0.0415 0.0415 12 0.23 0.23 0.472 0.472
4/2019 DMR 0.071 0.071 0.4 0.4
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.15 0.15 0.0555 0.0555 11 0.38 0.38 0.53 0.53
6/2019 DMR 0.06133 0.06133 2.5 0.74 0.74
7/2019 DMR 0.072 0.072 ® 2.5 0.82 0.82
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.18 0.18 0.061 0.061 16 16
8 5 ® 0.65 0.65 0.79 0.79
9/2019 DMR 0.06633 0.06633 5 0.69 0.69
10/2019 DMR . 0.076 0.076 �� 5 � 0.64 0.64
11/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.13 0.13 0.067 0.067 10 1 5 0.3 0.3 0.385 0.385
12/2019 DMR 0.0747 0.0747 -Q 5 2.5 0.283 0.283
1/2020 DMR 0.094 0.094 -Q 5 2.5 0.2 0.2
2/2020 DMR 706 705 8®® 0.28 0.28
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 0.14 0.14 0.0705 0.0705 16 0.38 0.38 0.45 0.45
4/2020 DMR 0.071 0.071 - < 5.3 2.65 0.51 0.51
Column Averages=> 0.1567 0.0691 15.0667 2.3396 0.7675 0.6139
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 55.91 % Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 20.02%
Literature/Default RR=> 79.00% Literature/Default RR=>II Literature/Default RR=>II
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 0 % of data is BDL 75 % of data is BDL 2 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=> 55.91 % RR for this HWA=> RR for this HWA=> 20.02%
Page 6 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
T Nit, gen T Phosphorus Chloride
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation < mg/L _Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR 27.52 27.52 3.1 3.1 140 140
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 19.52 19.52 4.4 4.4 2.6 2.6 140 140 115 115
7/2017 DMR 31.52 31.52 2.3 2.3 160 160
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 30.52 30.52 4 4 3.25 3.25 150 150 _ 140 140
9/2017 DMR 13.53 13.53 3.2 3.2 91 91
10/2017 DMR 29.52 29.52 4.4 4.4 160 160
11/2017 DMR/LTMP 34.52 34.52 6.1 6.1 3.8 3.8 110 110 145 145
I
12/2017 DMR 38.52 38.52 4.1 4.1 150 150
1/2018 DMR 27.52 27.52 3.1 3.1 160 160
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 17.52 17.52 4.7 4.7 2.4 2.4 120 120 103 103
3/2018 DMR 31.78 31.78 2.9 2.9 130 130
4/2018 DMR 26.52 26.52 3.7 3.7 140 140
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 30.53 30.53 5.2 5.2 3.85 3.85 170 170 180 180
6/2018 DMR 29.52 29.52 3.1 3.1 160 160
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 25.52 25.52 4.5 4.5 3.9 3.9 190 190 180 180
8/2018 DMR 31 31 3.4 3.4 160 160
9/2018 DMR 30.52 30.52 3.3 3.3 180 180
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 31.52 31.52 4 4 2.65 2.65 160 160 155 155
11/2018 DMR 15.52 15.52 1.1 1.1 93 93
12/2018 DMR 21.52 21.52 1.4 1.4 120 120
1/2019 DMR 18.37 18.37 1.2 1.2 120 120
2/2019 DMR 22.12 22.12 2.3 2.3 150 150
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 12.12 12.12 2.5 2.5 0.99 0.99 95 95 82 82
4/2019 DMR 22.33 22.33 2 2 110 110
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 31.37 31.37 3.7 3.7 2.6 2.6 150 150 130 130
6/2019 DMR 33.23 33.23 3.8 3.8 170 170
7/2019 DMR 37.13 37.13 4.2 4.2 170 170
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 27.12 27.12 5.8 5.8 3.85 3.85 170 170 145 145
9/2019 DMR 31.34 31.34 3.95 3.95 170 170
10/2019 DMR 37.12 37.12 3.8 3.8 170 170
11/2019 DMR/LTMP 34.12 34.12 4.8 4.8 3.7 3.7 160 160 140 140
12/2019 DMR 25.45 25.45 3.1 3.1 130 130
•1/2020 DMR 23.12 23.12 2.7 2.7 110 110
2/2020 DMR 23.12 23.12 2.1 2.1 120 120
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 22.72 22.72 5.1 5.1 2.85 2.85 86 86 103 103
4/2020 DMR 29.12 29.12 3.4 3.4 150 150
Column Averages=> 27.0572 4.5667 3.0025 141.7500 139.7778
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 34.25% Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 1.39%
Literature/Default RR=>II Literature/Default RR=>II Literature/Default RR=>II
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 0 %of data is BDL 0 %of data is BDL 0 % of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=>II RR for this HWA=> 34.25% RR for this HWA=>II
Page 7 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
TKN Phenols N1 BAS
Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Used in Effluent Used in Influent Efflu
ent Used in
Sample Date II Influent
Calculation < mg/L Calculation II
Calculation < mg/L Calculation mg/L Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017DMR II- Q 0.5 0.25I- III- --U
6/2017 DMR/LTMP • 38 38 G 0.5 0.25 --
7/2017 DMR . Q 0.5 0.25
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 11 53 53 Q 0.5 0.25 II 111 I
9/2017 DMR 1 -Q 0.5 0.25 II
Q 0.02
1 1 _______
1
10/2017 DMR -Q 0.5 0.25 .'
11/2017 DMR/LTMP II 46 46 0 1 1 -- I-
12/2017 DMR U 0 1 1
1/2018 DMR Q 1 1
2/2018 DMR/LTMP U 46 46 11 1
3/2018 DMR Q0.5 1 U Q 0.02 0.01
4/2018 DMR Q 1 0.25 1 Q 0.02 0.01
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 1 51 51 G 1 0.25
6/2018 DMR 1 Q 1 0.25 111 •
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 1 42 42 Q 1 1 1-
8/2018 DMR 1 G 1 1
9/2018DMR 111 0 0.5 1 . 111 1-
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 1 44 44 Q 1 1 U
11/2018 DMR I Q 0.5 1 11
12/2018 DMR 1 Q 0.5 1
-
1/2019 DMR I I 0.35 1
2/2019 DMR 11 Q 0.1 0.05 U 1 1____________DMR/LTMP 1 25 25 11 0.84 0.84 1 II
-
4/2019 DMR 11 I 0.31 1
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 1 45 45 11 0.175 0.175U
6/2019 DMR 1 1 0.13 1 1
-
7/2019 DMR 1 0 0.1 0.05 -
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 111 75 75 G 0.1 0.05
-
9/2019 DMR 0.16 0.16 Q 0.005 0.0025 -
10/2019 DMR Q 0.1 0.05 11/2019 DMR/LTMP 11 46 46 G 0.1 0.05 III I
12/2019 DMR I 0.43 1
1/2020DMR II -0 0.1 11 i--. 1 '-
2/2020 DMR . Q 0.1 0.05
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 1 33 33I U 0.85 0.85 11 11 1 -'-
4/2020 DMR 111 -0 0.1 0.05 •_- -- --.
Column Averages=> 45.3333 0.2419 _ 0.0081
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 50%BDL Unpaired Site Specific RR=>
Literature/Default RR=>Q Literature/Default RR=>I1 Literature/Default RR=>
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 56 %of data is BDL 100 % of data is BDL of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=>II RR for this HWA=>� RR for this HWA=>lI
Page 8 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

Removal Rate Calculations
\'insl Chloride aluminum
Influent Used Used in Effluent Used in
Sample Date e mg/L _ � Calculation < mg/L Calculation
5/2017 DMR 111
6/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.32 0.32 < 0.04 0.02
7/2017 DMR
8/2017 DMR/LTMP 0.75 0.75 < 0.04 0.02
9/2017 DMR -
10/2017 DMR 11/2017 DMR/LTMP •- 0.54 0.54 < 0.04 0.02
12/2017 DMR 111
1/2018 DMR
2/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.9 0.9 < 0.04 0.02
3/2018 DMR _
4/2018 DMR _
5/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.35 0.35 < 0.04 0.02
6/2018 DMR
7/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.34 0.34 < 0.04 0.02
8/2018 DMR
9/2018 DMR _
10/2018 DMR/LTMP 0.45 0.45 < 0.04 0.02
11/2018 DMR
12/2018 DMR _
1/2019 DMR
2/2019 DMR
3/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.4 0.4 < 0.04 0.02
4/2019 DMR
5/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.57 0.57 < 0.04 0.02
6/2019 DMR
7/2019 DMR
8/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.7 0.7 < 0.04 0.02
9/2019 DMR
10/2019 DMR
/2019 DMR/LTMP 0.47 0.47 0.071 0.071
12/2019 DMR
1/2020 DMR
2/2020 DMR
3/2020 DMR/LTMP 0.41 0.41 0.11 0.11
4/2020 DMR
Column Averages=> 0.5167 0.0318
Unpaired Site Specific RR=> Unpaired Site Specific RR=> 93.85
Literature/Default RR=>� Literature/Default RR=>�
removal-rate-May 2017-April 2020 of data is BDL 42 %of data is BDL
Removal Rates RR for this HWA=>� RR for this HWA=>�
Page 9 of 9 pages
6/24/2020, 1:32 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
. FLOW BOO TSS AMMONIA ARSENIC
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/I lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1 1.989 _
1 Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 56.79 28.97 56.25 28.69 10.1 5.1518_
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 31.25 5.95 7.115 1.35 1 0.1904_
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112 242.5 103.37 135 57.55 18.875 8.0459
4 Charlotte Pipe 1 0.031797 31,797 _
5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013 424.83 77.99 34.17 6.27 3.8583 0.7083 _
6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088 1.615 0.01 20.89 0.19 74.575 0.6764_
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974 38.37 17.27 19.14 8.62~.5 0.2251
8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677 204.375 4.56 23.625 0.53 1.023 0.0228
9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252 315.085 19.06 157.5 _ 9.53 12.755 0.7715_
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841 406.33 26.57 8.785 0.57 0.5533 0.0362_
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043 430 18.03 0.06 12.4 0.04_ 0.0400
12 ORO 1 0.0004469 447 8.156 0.03
13 Pilgrim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500 123.525 876.18 112.53' 798.19 44.79 317.7031
14 Tyson Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989 288.09 4495.37 44.595 695.86 24.45 381.5190
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.98411 2984105 I 5,655.3776 1,607.4318 715.0905
MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/I lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)=>I 6.9021 6,902,0001 235.611 13562.341 205.31 11817.62 26.636 1533.2395 0.0011 0.0633
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 7,906.9654 10,210.1864 818.1491
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)=> I 2421 I 3121 I 25.01 I I
Uncont.from Uncont.Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)_> I 205.1667 6703.87 85.16667 2782.84 23.68333 773.86 0.001 0.0327
Uncontrollable Concen.From Literature(mg/L)=> I 2201 r 2221 I 251 I 0.0031
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)=> 205.167 312 23.6833 0.001
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is Choose"Uncontrollable Concentration to be used in HWA"(row 31)from Uncontrollable Concentration From
protected,password is"2". "Mass Balance"(row 25),
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5. "Sampling"(row 27),or"Literature"(row 29). Document reasons.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
Page 1 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
FLOW CADMIUM CHROMIUM COPPER CYANIDE
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1 0.02007 0.0042
1 Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 - 0.01965 0.0100 0.0187 0.0095 0.0042 0.0021
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 - 0.05035 0.0096 0.00278 0.0005 0.0043 0.0008
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112- 0.00169 0.0007 0.05155 0.0220 0.00819 0.0035
4 Charlotte Pi se 1 0.031797 31,797 0.00072 0.0002 0.01095 0.0029 0.235 0.0623 5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013 -6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088 0.000417 0.00000 0.018385 0.0002 0.00465 0.0000 0.00513 0.0000
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974- ---8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677 0.00046 0.000010 0.0053 0.0001 0.14715 0.0033 0.00488 0.0001
9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252 0.00045 0.00003 0.01191 0.0007 0.04002 0.0024 0.01147 0.0007
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841 - 0.01123 0.0007 0.017 0.0011
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043 430 0.00042 0.000002 0.01095 0.0000 0.0161 0.0001 0.00313 0.00001
12 ORO 1 0.0004469 447 0.00045 0.0000 0.00272 0.0000 0.01808 0.0001 0.0058 0.0000
13 Pil:rim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500- 0.00454 0.0322
14 T son Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989 0.00031 0.0048 0.032 0.4993
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.9841 2984105 0.0051 0.0243 0.6003 0.0406
MGD gal/day mg/l lbs/day mg/l lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)=> 6.9021 6,902,000 0.0003 0.0173 0.0043 0.2475 0.0337 1.9399 0.0051 0.2936
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 0.0122 0.2232 1.3396 0.2529
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)=> ( 0.000371 I 0.00681 r 0.04101 1 0.00771
Uncont. from Uncont. Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)_> 0.00025 0.0082 0.0025 0.0817 0.015833 0.5173 0.006083 0.1988 I
Uncontrollable Concen.From Literature(mg/L)=> I 0.0031 ( 0.051 I 0.0611 I 0.0151
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)_> 0.00025 0.0068 0.041 0.0077
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is Choose"Uncontrollable Concentration to be used in HWA"(row 31)from Uncontrollable Concentration
protected,password is"2". From "Mass Balance"(row 25),
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5. "Sampling"(row 27),or"Literature"(row 29). Document reasons.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
Page 2 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
. FLOW LEAD MERCURY MOLYBDENUM NICKEL
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/I lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1 0.0029 0.032
1 'Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 0.0022 0.0011 0.2236 0.1141 0.053 0.0270
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 0.002 0.0004 0.6099 0.1161 0.105 0.0200
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112
4 Charlotte Pipe I 0.031797 31,797 0.0061 0.0016 0.005 0.0013 0.018 0.0048
5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013 I 0.004 0.0007
6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088 0.002 0.0000 0.10315 0.0009
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974 0.0003 0.0001
8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677 0.00215 0.0000 0.00015 0.00000 0.0055 0.0001
9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252 0.002 0.0001 I 0.012 0.0007
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043) 430 0.00001 0.0001
12 'ORO 1 0.0004469 447 0.001 0.0000 0.002 0.0000
13 Pilgrim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500
14 Tyson Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989 0.02 0.3121
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.9841 2984105 0.0033-7 0.00000 0.2315 I 0.3666
MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day _ mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)=> 6.902 6,902,000 0.00141 0.08061 0.00011 0.005761 0.00851 0.48931 0.0127 0.7310
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 0.0773 0.00575 0.2578 0.3644
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)_> I 0.0024I 1 0.000181 I 0.0079I I 0.0112I
Uncont.from Uncont. Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)=> 0.000758 0.0248 0.0000875 0.0029 0.005 0.003425 0.1119
Uncontrollable Concen.From Literature(mg/L)_> I 0.049I I 0.0003I I 1 I 0.0211
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)=> 0.0024 0.0000875 0.005 0.0112
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is Choose"Uncontrollable Concentration to be used in HWA"(row 31)from Uncontrollable
protected,password is"2". Concentration From "Mass Balance"(row 25),
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5. "Sampling"(row 27),or"Literature"(row 29). Document reasons.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
Page 3 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
. N FLOW SELENIUM SILVER ZINC Oil &Grease
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge _ Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg,/1_ lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1 0.0599
1 Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 0.1026 0.0523
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 I0.0216 0.0041
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112 0.003 0.0013 0.1815 0.0774
4 Charlotte Pipe 1 0.031797 31,797 0.5675 0.1505 -
I ■ - -,
5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013 0.036 0.0066 5.92 1.0868
6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088 0.001817 0.0000 0.01014 0.0001 2.425 0.0220
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974 0.044 0.0198 3.24 1.4585
8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677 0.12135 0.00271 8.265 0.1845
9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252 0.0039 0.00024 0.1446 0.0087
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841 0.1276 0.0083
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043 430 0.0018 0.00001 0.0088 0.0000
12 ORO 1 0.0004469 447 0.0005 0.0000 0.0735 0.0003
13 Pilgrim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500 3.643 25.8404
mini .. mimi,
14 Tyson Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989 0.073 1.1391 5.22 81.4531
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.98411 2984105 1 L 0.0015 1.4700 I 110.0454
MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)=> 6.9021 6,902,000 0.0025 0.1439 0.0005 0.0288 0.1567 9.02011 15.071 867.4696
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 0.0272 7.5501 757.4242
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)=> I I I 0.0008J I 0.23111 ( 23.18041
Uncont.from Uncont. Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)=> 0.002717 0.0888 0 0.0000 0.163333 5.3369 40.21661 1314.0894
Uncontrollable Concen.From Literature(mg/L)=> ( I I 0.005J I 0.175) 1001
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)_> 0.002717 0 0.2311 23.1804
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is Choose"Uncontrollable Concentration to be used in HWA"(row 31)from Uncontrollable
protected,password is"2". Concentration From "Mass Balance"(row 25),
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5. "Sampling"(row 27),or"Literature"(row 29). Document reasons.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
Page 4 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
. FLOW Flouride Aluminum TKN
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharg Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1 15.27 __
1 Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 0.163 0.0831
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 15.38 2.9277 0.5013 0.0954.
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112
4 Charlotte Pipe 1 0.031797 31,797
5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013 --- -= 11.39 2.0911
6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088 10.25 0.0930-
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974- = 1.64 0.7382
8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677--9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252-= 0.244 0.0148
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043 430-- 0.1275 0.0005
12 ORO 1 0.0004469 447 0.565 0.0021 5.389 0.0201
13 Pilgrim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500--- -_ 71.42 506.5942
14 T son Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989--- -_ 53.83 839.9659
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.9841 2984105 3.0228 0.2139 1 1,349.3894
MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)=> 6.9021 6,902,000 0.7675 44.1794 0.5167 29.7426 45.33 2,609.3163
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 41.1565 29.5288 1,259.9269
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)=> I 1.25961 I 0.90371 I I I 38.55911
Uncont.from Uncont.Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)=> 0.375833 12.2804 0.5225 17.0728-_ 35.583331 1162.6939
Uncontrollable Concen. From Literature(mg/L)=> I I I J I J
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)_> 1.2596 0.9037 II 38.5591
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is Choose"Uncontrollable Concentration to be used in HWA"(row 31)from Uncontrollable
protected,password is"2". Concentration From "Mass Balance"(row 25),
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5. "Sampling"(row 27),or"Literature"(row 29). Document reasons.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
Page 5 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

SIU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
N FLOW Ba
INDUSTRY Industry Average Discharge Average Discharge Average Discharge
IUP NAMES Permit/Pipe Conc. Load Conc. Load
Count (please list alphabetically) number MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Allvac 1
1 Allvac 2 0.0611608 61,161 _
2 Allvac Bakers/SAF 1 0.022825 22,825 _
3 Atrium Union 1 0.051112 51,112 0.086 0.0367
4 Charlotte Pipe 1 0.031797 31,797
5 Duke Foods 1 0.022013 22,013
6 ELG Utica 1 0.0010876 1,088
7 GAS 1 0.053974 53,974 _
8 Glenmark 1 0.0026773 2,677
9 GM Nameplate 02 2 0.0072522 7,252
10 Goulston 1 0.0078405 7,841
11 Norton Door 1 0.00043 430
12 ORO 1 0.0004469 447
13 Pilgrim's Pride 1 0.8505 850,500
14 Tyson Farms 1 1.870989 1,870,989
Sum of Industrial Loading(lbs/day)=> 2.9841 2984105 0.0367
MGD gal/day mg/1 lbs/day mg/1 lbs/day
Avg Influent loading(lbs/day)_> 6.9021 6,902,000 1 1 1
Uncontrollable Load from Mass Bal(lbs/day)=> 3.9179 #VALUE!
Uncontrollable Concen.from Mass Bal(mg/L)=> I #VALUE!
Uncont.from Uncont. Sampling(mg/L+lbs/day)_> IlErrn
Uncontrollable Concen. From Literature(mg/L)_> I I ( I
Uncontrollable conc.to be used in HWA(mg/L)=>
Spreadsheet Instructions:
1)Applicable Values should be entered in the Heavy Bordered cells. Rest of worksheet is
protected,password is"2".
2)Formulas are discussed in the Comprehensive Guidance,Chapter 5,Section E,page 5.
siu-unc-massbalance 2020
S IU.Uncont.Mass.Bal
1 Page 6 of 6 pages
6/24/2020,1:33 PM
Revision:August 1999

Calculator: Estimate NPDES Permit Limitations based on the Dissolved Water
Quality Standards and Stream & Effluent Hardness
FACILITY: PERMIT#: DATE: CALC BY:
City of Monroe NC0024333 6/17/2020 kketchum
Average Stream Flow Receiving Receiving Rec.Stream NPDES Total Total IWC-Instream IWC-Instream
Average
Stream Stream Hardness Wastewater Wastewater Average Effluent
(CFS) 1Q10 Flow Limit Suspended Upstream
summer summer (CaCO3, Concentration Concentration Hardness
7Q10(CFS) 7Q10(MOD) [MGD] [MGD] Solids(mg/L) mq/L) (Chronic) (Acute) Hardness
64.00 + 0.431 0.2774 0.24 10.40 10.001 128 0.97 0.98 44.171 130.171
Class C,C-NSW,C-Swamp,and B streams HQW streams
2 J 3 4 5 J 6 7 8 9 10
Dissolved Water Quality Translators- Total Metal (allocated Estimated NPDES Estimated NPDES
Criteria (function of total using EPA to permittee)Diss.Metal- Permit Limits [Total Permit Limits [Total
hardness) Default Translator Metal+MC] Metal+IWC]
Partition
Chronic Acute Coefficients Chronic Acute Chronic Acute Chronic Acute
PARAMETER* [ug/I] [ug/I] (streams) [ug/I] [ug/I] lug/I] [ug/q [ug/I) [ug/I]
Arsenic 150 340 1.000 150 340 154.00 347.71 77.00 173.86
Arsenic(HH/WS) 10 N/A 1.000 10 N/A 49.70 N/A 5.13 N/A
Beryllium 6.5 65 1.000 6.5 65 6.67 66.47 3.34 33.24
Cadmium(a) 0.51 3.40 0.252 2.0232 13.4488 2.1 13.75 1.0 6.88
Chlorides(WS) 250000 N/A 1.000 250000 N/A 256669 N/A 128334.4 N/A
Chromium III(a) 91' 697 0.202 448.3421 3446.679 460.3 3524.88 230.2 1762.44
Chromium VI 11 16 1.000 11 16 11.3 16.36 5.6 8.18
Chromium,Total N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Copper(a) 11.1 17.0 0.348 31.8014 48.7638 32.6 49.87 16.3 24.94
Cyanide 5.0 22.0 1.000 5.0000 22.0000 5.1 22.50 2.6 11.25
Flouride 1800.0 N/A 1.000 1800.0 N/A 1848.0 N/A 924.0 N/A
Lead(a) 3.29' 84 0.184 17.8758 458.7248 18.35 469.13 9.18 234.57
Mercury 0.012000 N/A 1.000 0.012000 N/A 0.012320 N/A 0.0061600 N/A
Molybdenum(WS) 160.001 N/A 1.000 160.0000 N/A 164.27 N/A 82.13 N/A
Nickel(a)** 64' 577 0.432 148.1720 1334.0517 152 1364.32 76 682.16
Nickel(WS) 25' N/A 1.000 25.0000 N/A 26 N/A 13 N/A
Selenium 5 56 1.000 5.0000 56.0000 5 57.27 3 28.64
Silver(a) 0.06 4.91 1.000 0.06 4.9141 0.06 5.03 0.03 2.51
Zinc(a) 146' 144 0.288 505.4410 501.3401 519 512.72 259 256.36
Cadmium(trout streams) I 0.51 0.511 0.2521 2.021 2.021 2.1 2.07 I 1.041 1.03
Ia. Denotes metals for which Aquatic Life Criteria are expressed as a function of total hardness.
*Arsenic has a Human Health standard of 10 ug/L is more stingent than the freshwater standards. The Permit limit
for arsenic would be determined by taking the Human Health Standard and dividing it by an IWC based on the mean
annual flow of the receiving stream and the permitted plant flow.
IIWC=Permitted Flow+(Permitted Flow+mean annual average)
**Nickel has a Water Supply standard of 25 ug/L and in most cases is more stringent than the freshwater standard.
The Permit limit for nickel using the 25 ug/L WS standard would be determined by dividing 25 by an IWC based on

%
• So i�ci� ( w for ao>o �w 1
7t/J It' c,11.-
?1r 10 ) 1.4°le (jL _
64 C t
./4v) eat. S61:41s - .3 .9efD
/01.91 pr7 `To4) w kat tI:t4
/i 11.9 I o 1&$ ,�°o ibsl�.. 3�?Jgao - lI?313$.fH, jj
�•3� • 3x9s" XWI
1
It1 3) 39 a.ls.
ads' days
.3,D.ly .7.1sisky : .003z1V SludAt. d:sPos.i 1J"t
•
y��•"► tCr'ts )00 4,- w-re
Dr/ Tames rye W WTP
3a Lig
/olig g7).y4.,4 - _ a97.6.s- ��rs < 1Jw7P
•

OPERATION SUMMARY
Permit it W00001346
-- FIELDS USED IN 2019
SITE FIELD DATE ACRES WWTP WTP WWTP WTP WWTP WTP PAN
_ NAME NO. GALS GALS YARDS YARDS Dry Tons Dry Tons (Ibs/ac)
Calvin Morris 1 10-Nov 11.6 _ 217 39.47 85.19
NC-AN-019
Ben 1 19-Jun 44.6 i54 20.11 6.71
Myers 19-Jul 732 135.00 68.37
NC-UN-18 19-Dec 225 40.94 22.98
19-Dec 126 32.16 9.90
_ 2 19-Oct 27.6 375 68.23 61 88
19-Oct 75 19.13 9.52
19-Nov 50 9.11 8.25
19-Nov 25 6.38 3.17
7 19-Jun 57 100 62.40 73.32 I
19-Jun 42 5.48 14.32
Wayne - 1 19-Sep 6.7 117 21.58 72.75
McBride 3 19-Sop 14.6 i
225 41.49 64.20
19-Sep 75 17.24 11.81
--Emerson 1 19-Aug 16.4 75 13.83 19.05
McBride 19-Aug 120 27.58 16.83
NC-UN-26 19-Sep 14 2.57 3.56
19-Sep 39 8.97 5.47
2 19-Aug 6.5 114 21.03 73.06
19-Aug 14 3 22 4.95
3 19-Aug 11.3 175 32.27 64.51
19-Aug 84 19.31 17.20
4 19-Aug 25.6 259 47 77 42.15
6 19-Jul 14 256 47.22 76.17
19-Jul 56 12.88 9.20
William 1 19-May 24.5 300 187.2 51.18
Griffin 19-May 148 19.33 11.74
NC-UN-29 2 19-May 5.7 117 73.01 85.79
3 19-Apr 7.4 153 95.48 • 86.41
on1 1 19-Nov f3.1 22-5 41a.92 78.22
Apponzeller 19-Nov 84 21.43 22.47
li _II. 1
Henry 3 19-May 2.5 53 33.07 88.61
Myers 4 19-Jun 4.7 100 62.41 88.93
NC-UN-31 19-Jun 42 5.48 9.49
5 19-Apr 17.6 195 121.68 46.31
19-May 78 48.68 18.52
19-Sep 50 9.22 11.83
19-Sep 225 51.72 29.401
6 19-Apr 7.8 - 78 48.68 41.8
`19-Sep 75 17.25 22.11
__T Danny 2 19-May 15.5 190 118.58 51.23
Baker 19-May 100 13.05 12.54
NC-UN-32 3 19-May 10 217 135.42 90.69
19-May 42 5.48 8.16
_ 4 19-May 3.2 _ 53 33.07 69.22
led Funderburk 1 19-Jul 5 - 117 21.58 97.48
NC-UN-33
Totals 1 30 .6 I 0 jf 0 4,860 1,526 1611.91 306.20
I Total Dry
Total Gallons 0 I Total Yards 6,386 I
Tons 1,918
WWTP- Metric Tons 1462.00
WTP- Metric Tons 277.72
Total Metric Tons 1739.73

ATTACHMENT A—Approved Residual Sources Certification Date:Novem er 13,2018
City of Monroe Permit Number:WQ0001346 Version: 4.0
Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring
Maximum Frequency for Approved
Owner Facility Name County Permit Biological Dry Tons Frequency for Frequency for Pathogen& Mineralization
Number Residuals Per Year 1 Non-hazardous= Metals and s Vector Attraction Rate
Characteristics Nutrients Reductions 4'5
City of Monroe Monroe W'TP 6 Union 01-90-010 No 1,200 Once p permit
See Table Below See Table Below 0.4
cycle
-
City of Monroe Monroe WWTP Union NC0024333 Yes 2,044 Annually See Table Below See Table Below 0.3
Total 3,244
1. Maximum Dry Tons per Year is the amount of residuals approved for land application from each permitted facility.
2. Analyses to demonstrate that residuals are non-hazardous(i.e.,TCLP,ignitability,reactivity,and corrosivity)as stipulated under permit Condition 1V.2.
3. Testing of metals and nutrients as stipulated under permit Condition N.3.
4. Analyses of pathogen and vector attraction reductions as stipulated under permit Condition N.4.
5. Monitoring frequencies are based on the actual dry tons applied per year using the table below,unless specified above.
Dry Tons Applied Monitoring Frequency 1
(short tons per year) (Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111)
<319 1/Year
=>319-<1,650 1/Quarter(4 times per year)
>1,650-<16,500 1/60 Days(6 times per year)
=>16,500 1/month(12 times per year)
-
6. CIass A water treatment plant residuals are exempt from meeting the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements in Condition IV.4,provided they are not mixed with residuals that have
been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater,the treatment of animal processing wastewater,or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater. The Class A water treatment plant
residuals must be treated and processed in a manner as to not meet the definition of`Biological Residuals"as defined in 15A NCAC 02T.1102(6).
If no land application events occur during a required sampling period(e.g.no land application occur during an entire year when annual monitoring is required),then no sampling data is
required during the period of inactivity.'the annual report shall include an explanation for missing sampling data.Those required to submit the annual report to EPA may be required to
make up the missed sampling,contact the EPA for additional information and clarification.
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 ' Attachment A Page 1 of I

CC Certification Date: Novemer 13,2018
ATTACHMENT l3-Approved Land Application Sites _.
City of Monroe Permit Number:WQ0001346 Version: 4.0
. Net Dominant Soil Footnotes
Field Owner Lessee County Latitude Longitude Acreage Series
NC-AN-019-01 Morris,Calvin O.,Jr.;Morris,Pamela W. Anson 34.958969° -80.274569° 11.6 GoB-Goldston 1
Total for Anson County 11.6
NC-UN-018-01 Myers,Ben H. Union 34.999494°_ -80.494989° 44.6 BdB2-Badin 2
NC-UN-018-02 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.000936° -80.499931° 27.6 BdB2-Badin 2
NC-UN-018-07 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.014811° -80.490189° 5.7 CmB-Cid 3
NC-UN-018-08 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.012633° -80.489753° 16.0 CmB-Cid 3
NC-UN-025-01 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.831256° -80.625022° 6.7 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-025-03 McBride,Wayne Union 34.832678° -80.623289° 14.6 TaB2-Tatum _ 4,5
NC-UN-026-01 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.829586° -80.632933° 16.4 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-02 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.828144° -80.628606° 6.5 TaB2-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-03 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.825778° -80.632144° 11.3 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-04 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.824192 -80.617722 25.6 CmB-Cid 5
NC-UN-026-05 McBride,Wayne Union 34.829475° -80.638856° 11.0 TaB2-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-06 McBride,Wayne Union 34.834989° -80.627711° 26.5 TbB2-Tatum 4
NC-IJN-027-01 Wolfe,Leland Mack Union 35.176894° -80.431725° 15.5 GsB-Goldston 6, 13
NC-UN-027-02 Wolfe,Leland Mack Union 35.176869° -80.429403° 18.4 GsB-Goldston 6, 14,15
NC-UN-029-01 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.928489° -80.317286° 24.5 GoC-Goldston 7
NC-UN-029-02 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.929017° -80.313639° 5.7 GoC-Goldston 7
NC-UN-029-03 Griffin,Diane S.;Griffin,William Irvin Union 34.993989° -80.389647° 7.2 BaB-Badin 8
NC-UN-029-04 Griffin,Diane S.;Griffin,William Irvin Union 34.995753° -80.392758° 2.9 BdB2-Badin 8
NC-UN-029-05 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.995753° -80.392758° 2.2 CmB-Cid 7
NC-UN-030-01 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 34.995506° -80.396025° 13.1 BdB2-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-02 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 34.995656° -80.387978° 11.9 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-03 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 34.999283° -80388067° 11.8 BaB-Badin 9
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Attachment B Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT B-Approved Land Application Sites Certification Date:November 13,2018
City of Monroe Permit Number: WQ0001346 Version: 4.0
NC-UN-030-04 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 35.0018I 1° -80.386031° 15.2 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-05 - Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 35.003514° -80.385669° 10.8 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-031-03 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.015489° -80.480756° 2.5 BdB2-Badin 10
NC-UN-031-04 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.016161° -80.478764° 4.7 BdB2-Badin 10
NC-UN-031-05 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.018933° -80.475706° 17.6 TbB2-Tatum 10
NC-UN-031-06 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.020522° -80.472492° 7.8 ChA-Chewacla 10
NC-UN-032-01 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.980117 -80.386383 23.5 GsB-Goldston 11
NC-UN-032-02 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.979800 -80.389319 15.5 BdB2-Badin 11
NC-UN-032-03 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.977600. -80.386603 10.0 GsB-Goldston 11
NC-UN-032-04- Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.977058 -80.388456 3.2 GsB-Goldston 1 I
NC-UN-032-05 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.972914 -80.389097 19.3 CmB-Cid 11
NC-UN-033-01 Funderburk,Leonard Theodore Union 34.879225 -80.481147 5.0 TbB2-Tarris 12,16-20
Total for Union County 460.8
Total
472.4
1 to 12. See Figures 1 to 12,respectively.
13. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Joseph
H.Davis and Donna C.Davis of 1708 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
14. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Diane
Ruth Robb of 1809 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
15. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Todd A.
Novick and Kim Hovick of 1909 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
16. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be Iand applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Glenson
Fairley Funderburk and Frances B.Funderburk of 1804 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
17. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Elizabeth
McNeely Billotto and Christopher Emilio Billotto of 1816 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
18. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Jason A.
McNeely and Heather J.McNeely of 1914 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
19. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be laud applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Debra
Davis Stallings and Cameron Lee Stallings of 1918 Mt Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
20. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this Iand application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Joseph L.
Suggs and Melissa F.Suggs of 1825 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Attachment B Page 2 of 2

NORTH CAROLINA
ROY COOPER Environmental Quality
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
tarertm Director
November 13,2018
RUSSELL G.COLBATH,PE—WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR
CITY OF MONROE
POST OFFICE BOX 69
MONROE,NORTH CAROLINA 28111
Subject: Permit No. WQ0001346
City of Monroe RLAP
Land Application of
Class B Residuals
Union County
Dear Mr. Colbath:
In accordance with your permit renewal and major modification request received August 2, 2018,
and subsequent additional information received September 27, 2018, we are forwarding herewith Permit
No.WQ0001346 dated November 13,2018,to the City of Monroe for the continued operation of the subject
residuals management program.
Modifications to the subject permit are as follows:
1. Removal of six fields in Stanly County totaling 56.3 acres, those fields being NC-ST-012-01
to-05 and NC-ST-28-01.
2. Removal of twelve fields in Union County totaling 85.8 acres,those fields being;NC-UN-023-
01 to-05; and NC-UN-023-07 to-10.
3. Fields NC-UN-018-03 to 06 were renamed NC-UN-031-03 to-06 due to change in ownership.
4. Addition of seven fields in Union County totaling 78.7 acres, those fields being NC-UN-29-
05,NC-UN-32-01 to-05,and NC-1UN-033-01.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2024, shall void Permit
No. WQ0001346 issued September 30, 2013, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements listed in Attachment A for
they may differ from the previous permit issuance. Failure to establish an adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required operational information shall result in future compliance problems.
DEck--4
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources I Non-Discharge Branch
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
919.707.3654

Mr. Russell G.Colbath,PE
November 13,2018
Page 2 of 2
Please note the following permit conditions have been removed since the last permit issuance
dated September 3,2013:
Old Conditions 1.2., 1.3. and 1.4.—These conditions compliance schedules have been met.
Old Condition V1.6.—This condition is incorporated in the new Condition VI.6.
If any parts, requirements or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, the Pennittee
has the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of
this permit. This request shall be in the form of a written petition,conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made,this permit shall be final and binding.
If you need additional information concerning this permit,please contact Troy Doby at(919) 707-
3655 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Linda Culpepper, Interim Director
?Linda
of Water Resources
cc: Union County Health Department(Electronic Copy)
Mooresville Regional Office, Water Quality Regional Operations Section(Electronic Copy)
Rob Willcox—Willcox& Mabe Soil Solutions(Electronic Copy)
Martin Mabe—Willcox&Mabe Soil Solutions(Electronic Copy)
Beth Buffington—Protection and Enforcement Branch(Electronic Copy)
Laserfiche File(Electronic Copy)
Digital Permit Archive(Electronic Copy)
Central Files

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
RALEIGH
LAND APPLICATION OF CLASS B RESIDUALS PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143,General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended,and other applicable Laws,Rules,and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
City of Monroe
Union County
FOR THE
continued operation of a residuals management program for the City of Monroe and consisting of the land
application of Class B residuals generated by the approved facilities listed in Attachment A to the approved
fields listed in Attachment B with no discharge of wastes to surface waters, pursuant to the application
received August 2, 2018, and subsequent additional information received by the Division of Water
Resources, and in conformity with other supporting data subsequently filed and approved by the
Department of Environmental Quality and considered a part of this permit.The use and disposal of residuals
are regulated under Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 503. This permit does not exempt the
Permittee from complying with the federal regulations.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until January 31, 2024, shall void Permit No.
WQ0001346 issued September 30, 2013, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
SCHEDULES
1. No later than six months prior to the expiration of this permit, the Permittee shall request renewal of
this permit on official Division forms. Upon receipt of the request, the Division will review the
adequacy of the facilities described therein,and if warranted,will renew the permit for such period of
time and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate. Please note Rule 15A
NCAC 02T.0105(d)requires an updated site map to be submitted with the permit renewal application.
[15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(2), 02T .0105(d), 02T.0109]
II. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The subject residuals management program shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so
there is no discharge to surface waters, nor any contravention of groundwater or surface water
standards. In the event the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of prolonged
nuisance conditions due to improper operation and maintenance,the Permittee shall immediately cease
land applying residuals, contact the Mooresville Regional Office supervisor, and take any immediate
corrective actions. [G.S. 143-215.1]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 1 of 13

2. This permit shall not relieve the Permittee of responsibility for damages to groundwater or surface
water resulting from the operation of this residuals management program. [15A NCAC 02B .0200,
02L .0100]
3. Only residuals generated by the facilities listed in Attachment A are approved for land application in
accordance with this permit. [G.S. 143-215.1]
4. Only the fields listed in Attachment B are approved for residuals land application. [G.S. 143-215.1]
5. Pollutant concentrations in residuals applied to land application sites listed in Attachment B shall not
exceed the following Ceiling Concentrations (i.e., dry weight basis) or Cumulative Pollutant
Loading Rates(CPLRs):
Parameter Ceiling Concentration CPLR
(milligramsper kilogram) (poundsper acre)
�' �
Arsenic 75 36
Cadmium 85 34
Copper 4,300 1,338
Lead 840 267
Mercury 57 15
Molybdenum 75 n/a
Nickel 420 374
Selenium 100 89
Zinc 7,500 2,498
The Permittee shall determine compliance with the CPLRs using one of the following methods:
a. By calculating the existing cumulative level of pollutants using actual analytical data from all
historical land application events of residuals,or
b. For land where residuals application has not occurred or for which the required data is incomplete,
by determining background concentrations through representative soil sampling.
[15A NCAC 02T .1105]
6. Residuals that are land applied shall meet Class B pathogen reduction requirements in 15A NCAC 02T
.1106(a)and(c). Exceptions to this requirement shall be specified in Attachment A. [15A NCAC 02T
.1106]
7. Biological residuals (i.e. residuals generated during the treatment of domestic or animal processing
wastewater, or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater, and as identified in Attachment A)
that are land applied shall meet one of the vector attraction reduction alternatives in 15A NCAC 02T
.1107(a). Exceptions to this requirement shall be specified in Attachment A. [15A NCAC 02T .1107]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 2 of 13

8. Setbacks for Class B land application sites shall be as follows:
Setback by application type
(feet)
Setback Description Vehicular Irrigation
Surface Surface Injection/
Application Application Incorporation
Habitable residence or place of public assembly under
separate ownership or not to be maintained as part of 400 400 200
the project site
Habitable residence or places of public assembly
owned by the Permittee,the owner of the land,or the 0 200 0
lessee/operator of the land to be maintained as part of
the project site
Property lines 50 150 50
Public right of way 50 50 50
Private or public water supply 100 100 100
Surface waters(streams—intermittent and perennial,
p 100 100 50
perennial waterbodies,and wetlands)
Surface water diversions(ephemeral streams, 25 100 25
waterways, ditches)
Groundwater lowering ditches(where the bottom of 25 100 25
the ditch intersects the SHWT)
Subsurface groundwater lowering system 0 100 0
Wells with exception to monitoring wells 100 100 100
Bedrock outcrops 25 25 25
Top of slope of embankments or cuts of two feet or
more in vertical height 15 15 15
Building foundations or basements 0 15 0
Water lines 0 10 0
Swimming pools 100 100 100
Nitrification fields 0 20 0
[15A NCAC 02T .1108]
9. Land application areas shall be clearly marked on each site prior to and during any residuals application
event. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(1)]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 3 of 13

10. Bulk residuals and other sources of Plant Available Nitrogen(PAN)shall not be applied in exceedance
of agronomic rates. Appropriate agronomic rates shall be calculated using expected nitrogen
requirements based on the determined Realistic Yield Expectations(RYE)using any of the following
methods:
a. Division's pre-approved site specific historical data for specific crop or soil types by calculating
the mean of the best three yields of the last five consecutive crop harvests for each field.
b. North Carolina Historical Data for specific crop and soil types as provided by North Carolina State
University Department of Soil Science (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/index.php). A copy
shall be kept on file and reprinted every five years in accordance with Condition IV.6.
c. If the RYE cannot be determined using methods(a)or(b)above,the Pennittee may use the RYE
and appropriate nutrient application rates reported in any of the following documents:
i. Crop management plan as outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource
Conservation Service,or other agronomist.
ii. Waste Utilization Plan as outlined by the Senate Bill 1217 Interagency Group - Guidance
Document: Chapter 1
(http://www.ncagr.gov/SWC/tech/documents/9th Guidance Doc 100109.pdf).
iii. Certified Nutrient Management Plan as outlined by the Natural Resources Conservation
Services (NRCS). These plans must meet the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management
Standards(ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NHO/practice-standards/standards/590.pdf).
d. If the RYE and appropriate nutrient application rates cannot be determined, the Permittee shall
contact the Division to determine necessary action.
[15A NCAC 02T .1109(b)(1)(k)]
11. When residuals are land applied to grazed pasture, hay crop realistic nitrogen rate shall be reduced by
25% in accordance with the USDA-NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standards. [15A NCAC 02T
.0108(b)(1)]
12. If land application sites are to be over-seeded or double-cropped (e.g., bermuda grass in the summer
and rye grass in the winter with both crops to receive residuals), then the second crop can receive an
application of PAN at a rate not to exceed 50 pounds per acre per year(lbs/ac/yr). This practice may
be allowed as long as the second crop is to be harvested or grazed. If the second crop is to be planted
for erosion control only and is to be tilled into the soil,then no additional PAN shall be applied. [15A
NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
13. Prior to land application of residuals containing a sodium adsorption ratio (SAR)of 10 or higher,the
Permittee shall obtain and implement recommendations from at least one of the following: the local
Cooperative Extension Office; the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; the Natural
Resource Conservation Service; a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist; or an agronomist. The
recommendations shall address the sodium application rate,soil amendments(e.g.,gypsum, etc.),or a
mechanism for maintaining site integrity and conditions conducive to crop growth. The Permittee shall
maintain written records of these recommendations and details of their implementation. [15A NCAC
02T.0108(b)(1)]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 4 of 13

14. These residuals land application sites were individually permitted on or after December 30, 1983;
therefore,the compliance boundary is established at either 250 feet from the residual land application
area,or 50 feet within the property boundary,whichever is closest to the residual land application area.
An exceedance of groundwater standards at or beyond the compliance boundary is subject to
remediation action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(d)(2) as well as enforcement actions in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C. Any approved
relocation of the COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY will be noted in Attachment B. [15A NCAC 02L
.0107(a)]
15. The review boundary shall be established midway between the compliance boundary and the residual
land application area. Any exceedance of groundwater standards at the review boundary shall require
action in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0106. [15A NCAC 02L .0108]
III. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The residuals management program shall be properly maintained and operated at all times. The
program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non-discharge system to prevent any
contravention of surface water or groundwater standards. [15A NCAC 02T .1110]
2. The Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number [phone], and the appropriate local
government official(i.e.,county manager,city manager, or health director)shall be notified at least 48
hours prior to the initial residuals land application to any new land application site. Notification to the
regional supervisor shall be made from 8:00 a.m.until 5:00 p.m.on Monday through Friday,excluding
State Holidays. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(1)]
3. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified via email or telephone,[phone], at least 24
hours prior to conducting any land application activity. Such notification shall indicate,at a minimum,
the anticipated application times, field IDs, and location of land application activities. If it becomes
necessary to apply to additional fields due to unforeseen events, the Regional Office shall be notified
prior to commencing the application to those fields. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)(1)]
4. The Permittee shall maintain an approved Operation and Maintenance Plan(O&M Plan)Modifications
to the O&M Plan shall be approved by the Division prior to utilization of the new plan.The O&M Plan,
at the minimum, shall include:
a. Operational functions;
b. Maintenance schedules;
c. Safety measures;
d. Spill response plan;
e. Inspection plan including the following information:
i. Names and/or titles of personnel responsible for conducting the inspections;
ii. Frequency and location of inspections, including those to be conducted by the ORC, and
procedures to assure that the selected location(s) and inspection frequency are representative
of the residuals management program;
iii. Detailed description of inspection procedures including record keeping and actions to be taken
by the inspector in the event that noncompliance is observed pursuant to the noncompliance
notification requirements under the monitoring and reporting section of the permit;
f. Sampling and monitoring plan including the following information:
i. Names and/or titles of personnel responsible for conducting the sampling and monitoring;
ii. Detailed description of monitoring procedures including parameters to be monitored;
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 5 of 13

iii. Sampling frequency and procedures to assure that representative samples are being collected.
Fluctuation in temperature, flow, and other operating conditions can affect the quality of the
residuals gathered during a particular sampling event.The sampling plan shall account for any
foreseen fluctuations in residuals quality and indicate the most limiting times for residuals to
meet pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (e.g. facilities that land apply
multiple times per year but have an annual sampling frequency, may need to sample during
winter months when pathogen reduction is most likely to be negatively affected by cold
temperatures).
[15A NCAC 02T .1100]
5. Upon the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission's (WPCSOCC)
classification of the facility,the Permittee shall designate and employ a certified operator in responsible
charge (ORC) and one or more certified operators as back-up ORCs in accordance with 15A NCAC
08G .0201.The ORC or his back-up shall visit the facilities in accordance with 15A NCAC 08G.0204,
or as specified in the most recently approved O&M plan (i.e., see Condition 1II.4.), and shall comply
with all other conditions of 15A NCAC 08G. 0204. For more information regarding classification and
designation requirements,please contact the Division of Water Resources' Protection and Enforcement
Branch at(919)707-9105. [15A NCAC 02T .0117]
6. When the Permittee land applies bulk residuals,a copy of this permit and a copy of O&M Plan shall be
maintained at the land application sites during land application activities. [15A NCAC 02T
.0108(b)(1)]
7. When the Permittee transports or land applies bulk residuals, the spill control provisions shall be
maintained in all residuals transport and application vehicles. [15A NCAC 02T .1110]
8. Residuals shall not be stored at any land application site, unless written approval has been requested
and received from the Division. [G.S. 143-215.1]
9. When the Permittee land applies bulk residuals, adequate measures shall be taken to prevent wind
erosion and surface runoff from conveying residuals from the land application sites onto adjacent
properties or into surface waters. [G.S. 143-215.1]
10. When the Permittee land applies bulk residuals,a suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on land
application sites onto which residuals are applied, or application shall be in accordance with the crop
management plan outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services,the Natural Resource Conservation Service,or an agronomist and as approved
by the Division. [15A NCAC 02T.1109(b)(1)]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 6 of 13

11. Bulk residuals shall not be land applied under the following conditions:
a. If the residuals are likely to adversely affect a threatened or endangered species listed under section
4 of the Endangered Species Act or its designated critical habitat;
b. If the application causes prolonged nuisance conditions;
c. If the land fails to assimilate the bulk residuals or the application causes the contravention of surface
water or groundwater standards;
d. If the land is flooded,frozen or snow-covered,or is otherwise in a condition such that runoff of the
residuals would occur;
e. Within the 100-year flood elevation,unless the bulk residuals are injected or incorporated within a
24-hour period following a residuals land application event;
f. During a measurable precipitation event(i.e., greater than 0.01 inch per hour), or within 24 hours
following a rainfall event of 0.5 inches or greater in a 24-hour period;
g. If the slope is greater than 10% for surface applied liquid residuals, or if the slope is greater than
18%for injected or incorporated bulk liquid residuals;
h. If the land does not have an established vegetative cover unless the residuals are incorporated or
injected within a 24-hour period following a residuals land application event. Any field that is in a
USDA no-till program shall be exempted from meeting this vegetative cover requirement;
i. If the vertical separation between the seasonal high water table and the depth of residuals
application is less than one foot;
j. If the vertical separation of bedrock and the depth of residuals application is less than one foot;
k. Application exceeds agronomic rates.
[15A NCAC 02T .1109J
12. The following public access restrictions apply to residual land application sites:
a. Public access to public contact sites(e.g.,golf courses,parks,ball fields,etc.)shall be restricted
for 365 days after a residuals land application event;
b. Public access to non-public contact sites shall be restricted for 30 days after a residuals land
application event.
[15A NCAC 02T.1109(b)(2)]
13. Public access controls shall include the posting of signs with a minimum area of 3 square feet (e.g.,
1.5' x 2'). Each sign shall indicate the activities conducted at each site,permit number,and name and
contact information, including the Permittee or applicator's telephone number. Signs shall be posted
in a clearly visible and conspicuous manner at the entrance to each land application site during a land
application event, and for as long as the public access restrictions required under Condition 111.12.
apply. [15A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1)]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 7 of 13

14. The following harvesting and grazing restrictions apply to residual land application sites after each
land application event:
Harvesting and Grazing Description Restricted
Duration
Animals shall not be allowed to graze during land application activities and
restricted period. Sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing to 30 days
prevent access after each land application event.
Food crops,feed crops and fiber crops shall not be harvested for: 30 days
Turf grown on land where residuals have been applied shall not be harvested for: 12 months
Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residual/soil mixture and are
totally above the land surface(e.g.,tobacco,melons,cucumbers, squash,etc.) 14 months
shall not be harvested for:
When the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer prior to
incorporation into the soil, food crops with harvested parts below the land 20 months
surface(e.g.,root crops such as potatoes, carrots, radishes,etc.)shall not be
harvested for:
When the residuals remain on the land surface for less than four months prior to
incorporation into the soil,food crops with harvested parts below the land 38 months
surface shall not be harvested for:
[15A NCAC 02T.1109(b)(3)]
15. The Permittee shall acquire from each landowner or lessee/operator a statement detailing the volume
of other nutrient sources (i.e., manufactured fertilizers, manures, or other animal waste products) that
have been applied to the site,and a copy of the most recent Nutrient Management Plan(NMP)for those
operations where a NMP is required by the US Department of Agriculture — National Resources
Conservation Service(NRCS)or other State Agencies.The Permittee shall calculate allowable nutrient
loading rates based on the provided information and use appropriate reductions.
For the purpose of this permit condition, a Crop Management Plan (CMP), Waste Utilization Plan
(WUP) or Certified Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) shall also be considered a Nutrient
Management Plan. [l 5A NCAC 02T .0108(b)(1), 02T.1104(c)(3)]
16. No residuals shall be land applied unless the submitted Land Owner Agreement between the Permittee
and landowners or lessees/operators of the land application site is in full force and effect. These
agreements shall be considered expired concurrent with the permit expiration date,and shall be renewed
during the permit renewal process. [15A NCAC 02T .1104(c)(4)]
W00001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 8 of 13

IV. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any Division-required monitoring (including groundwater, plant tissue, soil and surface water
analyses) necessary to ensure groundwater and surface water protection shall be established, and an
acceptable sample reporting schedule shall be followed. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(c)]
2. Residuals shall be analyzed to demonstrate they are non-hazardous under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA). Residuals that tests or is classified as a hazardous or toxic waste under 40
CFR Part 261 shall not be used or disposed under this permit. The analyses [corrosivity,ignitability,
reactivity, and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)] shall be performed at the
frequency specified in Attachment A, and the Permittee shall maintain these results for a minimum of
five years. Any exceptions from the requirements in this condition shall be specified in Attachment A.
The TCLP analysis shall include the following parameters(the regulatory level in milligrams per liter
is in parentheses):
Arsenic(5.0) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene(7.5) Nitrobenzene(2.0)
Barium(100.0) 1,2-Dichloroethane(0.5) Pentachlorophenol(100.0)
Benzene(0.5) 1,1-Dichloroethylene(0.7) Pyridine(5.0)
Cadmium(1.0) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene(0.13) Selenium(1.0)
Carbon tetrachloride(0.5) Endrin(0.02) Silver(5.0)
Chlordane(0.03) Hexachlorobenzene(0.13) Tetrachloroethylene(0.7)
Chlorobenzene(100.0) Heptachlor(and its hydroxide) Toxaphene(0.5)
(0.008)
Chloroform(6.0) Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene(0.5) Trichloroethylene(0.5)
Chromium(5.0) Hexachloroethane(3.0) 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol(400.0)
m-Cresol(200.0) Lead(5.0) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(2.0)
o-Cresol(200.0) Lindane(0.4) 2,4,5-TP(Silvex)(1.0)
p-Cresol(200.0) Mercury(0.2) Vinyl chloride(0.2)
Cresol (200.0) Methoxychlor(10.0)
2,4-D(10.0) Methyl ethyl ketone(200.0)
Once the residuals have been monitored for two years at the frequency specified in Attachment A, the
Permittee may submit a permit modification request to reduce the frequency of this monitoring
requirement. In no case shall the monitoring frequency be less than once per permit cycle.
[15A NCAC 13A .0102(b),02T .1101,02T .1105]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 9 of 13

3. An analysis shall be conducted on residuals from each source generating facility at the frequency
specified in Attachment A, and the Permittee shall maintain the results for a minimum of five years.
The analysis shall include the following parameters:
Aluminum Mercury Potassium
Ammonia-Nitrogen Molybdenum Selenium
Arsenic Nickel Sodium
Cadmium Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen Sodium Adsorption Ratio
(SAR)
Calcium Percent Total Solids TKN
Copper pH Zinc
Lead Phosphorus
Magnesium Plant Available Nitrogen
(by calculation)
[15A NCAC 02T.1101]
4. Residuals shall be monitored for compliance with pathogen and vector attraction reduction
requirements at the frequency specified in Attachment A,and at the time indicated in the sampling and
monitoring sections of the approved O&M plan.The required data shall be specific to the stabilization
process utilized, and sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Class B pathogen reduction
requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .1106(a)and(c),and one vector attraction reduction requirement in
15A NCAC 02T .1107(a) shall be met. Any exceptions from the requirements in this condition shall
be specified in Attachment A. [15A NCAC 02T.1106,02T.1107,02T.1111(c)]
5. An annual representative soils analysis (i.e., Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on
each land application site listed in Attachment B on which a residuals land application event will occur
in the respective calendar year. This analysis shall be in accordance with the "Guidance on Soil
Sampling" located in the Sampling Instructions section of the NC Department of Agriculture &
Consumer Services'website(http://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm).The Permittee shall maintain
these results and a description of the sampling methodologies used to determine soil fertility for a period
of no less than five years,and shall be made available to the Division upon request. At a minimum,the
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include the following parameters:
Acidity Exchangeable Sodium Percentage Phosphorus
Base Saturation(by calculation) Magnesium Potassium
Calcium Manganese Sodium
Cation Exchange Capacity Percent Humic Matter Zinc
Copper pH
[15A NCAC 02T.0108(c), 15A NCAC 02T.1111(d)]
6. Laboratory parameter analyses shall be performed on the residuals as they are land applied, and shall
be in accordance with the monitoring requirements in 15A NCAC 02B.0505. [15A NCAC 02B.0505]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 10 of 13

7. The Permittee shall maintain records tracking all residual land application events. At a minimum,these
records shall include the following:
a. Source of residuals;
b. Date of land application;
c. Location of land application(i.e., site,field, or zone number as listed in Attachment B);
d. Approximate areas applied to(acres);
e. Method of land application;
f. Weather conditions(e.g., sunny,cloudy, raining, etc.);
g. Predominant Soil Mapping Unit(e.g.,CbB2);
h. Soil conditions(e.g.,dry,wet, frozen, etc.);
i. Type of crop or crops to be grown on field;
j. Nitrogen Application Rate based on RYEs (if using data obtained from the North Carolina State
University Department of Soil Science Website,the printout page shall be kept on file and reprinted
every five years);
k. Volume of residuals land applied in gallons per acre,cubic yard per acre,dry tons per acre,or wet
ton per acre;
I. Volume of animal waste or other nutrient source applied in gallons per acre, dry ton per acre, or
wet tons per acre;
m. Volume of soil amendments(e.g., lime,gypsum,etc.)applied in gallons per acre,dry ton per acre,
or wet tons per acre;and
n. Annual and cumulative totals in dry tons per acre of residuals as well as animal waste and other
sources of nutrients(e.g.,if applicable),annual and cumulative pounds per acre of each heavy metal
(e.g., shall include, but shall not be limited to, arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury,
molybdenum, nickel, selenium,and zinc), annual pounds per acre of PAN, and annual pounds per
acre of phosphorus applied to each field.
[15A NCAC 02T .0109(a)]
8. Three copies of an annual report shall be submitted on or before March 1'. The annual report shall
meet the requirements described in the Instructions for Residuals Application Annual Reporting Forms.
Instructions for reporting and annual report forms are available at
http://deq.nc.gov/about/div is ions/water-resources/water-resources-perm its/wastewater-branch/non-
discharge-permitting-unit/reporting-forms, or can be obtained by contacting the Non-Discharge
Permitting Unit directly. The annual report shall be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Resources
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
[15A NCAC 02T.1111(a)]
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 11 of 13

9. Noncompliance Notification
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Mooresville Regional Office, telephone number (704)
663-1699,as soon as possible,but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following
the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Land application of residuals abnormal in quantity or characteristic.
b. Any failure of the land application program resulting in a release of material to surface waters.
c. Any time self-monitoring indicates the facility has gone out of compliance with its permit
limitations.
d. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, rendering the facility incapable of
adequate residual treatment.
e. Any spill or discharge from a vehicle or piping system during residuals transportation.
Any emergency requiring immediate reporting(e.g., discharges to surface waters, imminent failure of
a storage structure, etc.)outside normal business hours shall be reported to the Division's Emergency
Response personnel at telephone number(800) 662-7956,[phone],or(919) 733-3300.Persons
reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within five days
following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the actions taken or proposed to
be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. [15A NCAC 02T.0105(1), 02T .0108(b)(1)]
V. INSPECTIONS
1. The Permittee shall provide adequate inspection and maintenance to ensure proper operation of the
subject facilities and shall be in accordance with the approved O&M Plan. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)]
2. Prior to each bulk residuals land application event, the Permittee or his designee shall inspect the
residuals storage,transport and application facilities to identify malfunctions,facility deterioration and
operator errors that could result in discharges to the environment, a threat to human health or a public
nuisance. The Permittee shall maintain an inspection log that includes,at a minimum,the date and time
of inspection, observations made, and any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken. The
Permittee shall maintain this inspection log for a period of five years from the date of inspection, and
this log shall be made available to the Division upon request. [15A NCAC 02T.0108(b)]
3. Any duly authorized Division representative may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect
any property, premises or place on or related to the land application sites or facilities permitted herein
at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit;may inspect or copy
any records required to be maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit; and may collect
groundwater, surface water or leachate samples. [G.S. 143-215.3(a)(2)]
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Failure to comply with the conditions and limitations contained herein may subject the Permittee to an
enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.6A to
143-215.6C. [G.S. 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C]
2. This permit shall become voidable if the residuals land application events are not carried out in
accordance with the conditions of this permit. [15A NCAC 02T .0110]
3. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of residuals described in the permit
application and other supporting documentation. [G.S. 143-215.1]
W00001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 12 of 13

4. The issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by other jurisdictional government agencies
(e.g.,local, state,and federal). Of particular concern to the Division are applicable river buffer rules in
1 5A NCAC 02B .0200; erosion and sedimentation control requirements in 15A NCAC Chapter 4 and
under the Division's General Permit NCG010000; any requirements pertaining to wetlands under I5A
NCAC 02B .0200 and 02H .0500; and documentation of compliance with Article 21 Part 6 of Chapter
143 of the General Statutes. [15A NCAC 02T .0105(c)(6)]
5. In the event the residuals program changes ownership or the Permittee changes his name, a formal
permit modification request shall be submitted to the Division. This request shall be made on official
Division forms, and shall include appropriate documentation from the parties involved and other
supporting documentation as necessary. The Permittee of record shall remain fully responsible for
maintaining and operating the residuals program permitted herein until a permit is issued to the new
owner. [15A NCAC 02T .0104]
6. This permit is subject to revocation or unilateral modification upon 60-day notice from the Division
Director,in whole or part for the requirements listed in 15A NCAC 02T.0110. [15A NCAC 02T.0110]
7. Unless the Division Director grants a variance,expansion of the permitted residuals program contained
herein shall not be granted if the Permittee exemplifies any of the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .0120(b).
[15A NCAC 02T .0120]
8. The Permittee shall pay the annual fee within 30 days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay
the annual fee accordingly shall be cause for the Division to revoke this permit. [15A NCAC 02T
.0105(e)(3)]
Permit issued this the I3"day of November 2018
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
7-Linda Culpepper, Interim Director
V Division of Water Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0001346
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Shell Version 180711 Page 13 of 13

THIS PAGE BLANK

ATTACHMENT A—Approved Residual Sources Certification Date: November 13,2018
City of Monroe Permit Number:WQ0001346 Version:4.0
E Monitoring
Monitoring Monitoring Monitor
Permit 1 Biological M Frequency for Frequency for Frequency for Approved
1 Owner Facility Name County Dry Tons Pathogen& Mineralization
Number Residuals Per Year 1 Non-hazardous Metals and Vector Attraction Rate
Characteristics 2 Nutrients 3,3 Reductions s
City of Monroe Monroe WTP 6 Union 01-90-010 No 1,200 Once leermit See Table Below See Table Below 0.4 1
cyCity of Monroe Monroe WWII' Union NC0024333 Yes 2,044 Annually See Table Below See Table Below 0.3
Total 3,244
1. Maximum Dry Tons per Year is the amount of residuals approved for land application from each permitted facility.
2. Analyses to demonstrate that residuals are non-hazardous(i.e.,TCLP,ignitability,reactivity,and corrosivity)as stipulated under permit Condition IV.2.
3. Testing of metals and nutrients as stipulated under permit Condition IV.3.
4. Analyses of pathogen and vector attraction reductions as stipulated under permit Condition IV.4.
5. Monitoring frequencies are based on the actual dry tons applied per year using the table below,unless specified above.
Dry Tons Applied Monitoring Frequency
(short tons per year) (Established in 40 CFR 503 and 15A NCAC 02T.1111L
<319 1/Year
=>319-<1,650 1/Quarter(4 times per year)
=>1,650-<16,500 1/60 Days(6 times per year)
=>16,500 1/month(12 times per year)
6. Class A water treatment plant residuals are exempt from meeting the pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements in Condition IV.4,provided they are not mixed with residuals that have
been generated during the treatment of domestic wastewater,the treatment of animal processing wastewater,or the biological treatment of industrial wastewater. The Class A water treatment plant
residuals must be treated and processed in a manner as to not meet the definition of`Biological Residuals"as defined in 15A NCAC 02T.1102(6).
If no land application events occur during a required sampling period(e.g.no land application occur during an entire year when annual monitoring is required),then no sampling data is
required during the period of inactivity.The annual report shall include an explanation for missing sampling data.Those required to submit the annual report to EPA may be required to
make up the missed sampling,contact the EPA for additional information and clarification.
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Attachment A Page 1 of 1

THIS PAGE BLANK

ATTACHMENT B-Approved Land Application Sites Certification Date: November 13,2018
City of Monroe Permit Number: WQ0001346 Version: 4.0
•
Field Owner Lessee County Latitude Longitude Net Dominant Soil Footnotes
_ Acreage Series _
NC-AN-019-01 Morris,Calvin O.,Jr.;Morris,Pamela W. Anson 34.958969° -80.274569° 11.6 GoB-Goldston 1
Total for Anson County 11.6
NC-UN-018-01 Myers,Ben H. _ Union 34.999494° -80.494989° 44.6 BdB2-Badin 2
NC-UN-018-02 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.000936° -80.499931° 27.6 BdB2-Badin 2
NC-UN-018-07 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.014811° -80.490189° 5.7 CmB-Cid 3
NC-UN-018-08 Myers,Ben H. Union 35.012633° -80.489753° 16.0 CmB-Cid 3
NC-UN-025-01 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.831256° 410.625022° 6.7 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-025-03 McBride,Wayne Union 34.832678° -80.623289° 14.6 Taf2-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-01 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.829586° -80.632933° 16.4 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-02 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.828144° -80.628606° 6.5 TaB2-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-03 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.825778° -80.632144° 11.3 TaB-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-04 McBride,Emerson Brown Union 34.824192 -80.617722 25.6 CmB-Cid 5
NC-UN-026-05 , McBride,Wayne Union 34.829475° -80.638856° 11.0 TaB2-Tatum 4,5
NC-UN-026-06 McBride,Wayne Union 34.834989° -80.627711° 26.5 TbB2-Tatum 4
NC-UN-027-01 Wolfe,Leland Mack Union 35.176894° -80.431725° 15.5 GsB-Goldston 6, 13
NC-UN-027-02 Wolfe,Leland Mack Union 35.176869° -80.429403° 18.4 GsB-Goldston 6, 14,15
NC-UN-029-01 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.928489° -80.317286° 24.5 GoC-Goldston 7
NC-UN-029-02 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.929017° -80.313639° 5.7 GoC-Goldston 7
NC-UN-029-03 Griffin,Diane S.;Griffin,William Irvin Union 34.993989° -80.389647° 7.2 BaB-Badin 8
NC-UN-029-04 Griffin,Diane S.;Griffin,William Irvin Union 34.995753° -80.392758° 2.9 BdB2-Badin 8
NC-UN-029-05 Griffin,Diane S. Union 34.995753° -80.392758° 2.2 CmB-Cid 7
NC-UN-030-01 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 34.995506° -80.396025° 13.1 BdB2-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-02 Appenzeller, Little Union 34.995656° °
ppen ,Margaret -80.387978 11.9 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-03 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 34.999283° -80.388067° 11.8 BaB-Badin 9
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Attachment B Page 1 of 2

ATTACHMENT B-Approved Land Application Sites Certification Date:November 13,2018
City of Monroe Permit Number:WQ0001346 Version: 4.0
NC-UN-030-04 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 35.001811° -80.386031° 15.2 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-030-05 Appenzeller,Margaret Little Union 35.003514° -80.385669° 10.8 BaB-Badin 9
NC-UN-031-03 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.0154139° -80.480756° 2.5 BdB2-Badin 10
NC-UN-031-04 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.016161° -80.478764° 4.7 13dB2-Badin 10
NC-UN-031-05 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.018933° -80.475706° 17.6 TbB2-Tatum 10
NC-UN-031-06 Myers,Henry C. Union 35.020522° -80.472492° 7.8 ChA-Chewacla 10
NC-UN-032-01 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.980117 -80.386383 23.5 GsB-Goldston 11
NC-UN-032-02 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.979800 -80.389319 .15.5 BdB2-Badin 11
NC-UN-032-03 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.977600 -80.386603 10.0 GsB-Goldston 11
- - -,
NC-UN-032-04 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.977058 -80.388456 3.2 GsB-Goldston 11
NC-UN-032-05 Baker,Danny Lee Union 34.972914 -80.389097 19.3 CmB-Cid 11
NC-UN-033-01 Funderburk,Leonard Theodore Union 34.879225 -80.481147 5.0 TbB2-Tarris 12, 16-20
Total for Union County 460.8
Total
472.4
1 to 12. See Figures 1 to 12,respectively.
13. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Joseph
H.Davis and Donna C.Davis of 1708 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
14. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Diane
Ruth Robb of 1809 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
15. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Todd A.
Hovick and Kim Hovick of 1909 Jack Davis Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
16. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Glenson
Fairley Funderburk and Frances B.Funderburk of 1804 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
17. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Elizabeth
McNeely Billotto and Christopher Emilio Billotto of 1816 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
18. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Jason A.
McNeely and Heather J.McNeely of 1914 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
19. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Debra
Davis Stallings and Cameron Lee Stallings of 1918 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
20. A reduced setback from a residence under separate ownership has been approved for this land application site. Residuals may be land applied within 100 feet of the residence owned by Joseph L.
Suggs and Melissa F.Suggs of 1825 Mt.Pleasant Church Road,Monroe,NC 28112,regardless of whether a surface or a subsurface application method is used.
WQ0001346 Version 4.0 Attachment B Page 2 of 2

a
Li
IC • -.I.:. "" ,,
,'¢` FIELD NC AN-19-1 li'll'ilif:
r
:,,,,,,, ,.. '--
w 44
• st.4) /(,el
,k
w \ %4'1 C. * d:::).d",...",
°
,a.
t „
Access Road
N... is
• Viso
s Iii _ ♦ Structure
'so ■ Dwelling
• Gate
FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES I► Drain
NC-AN-19-1 18.5 6.9 11.6 • -Pond
REFERENCE: R1 Buffer
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRI,INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN,LEGAL,OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO Q Field Boundary o
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. RASS,PLLCASSIftIES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY -+""'4, :b
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. k%bfo2matY'-„c`r `-t°e-pi,R' -i (3 ' N,„,I Properly Boundary g
_ ___ rL ^>ANIc,A },*A ma I Ja 01 l.-.- ,.-.,-•yl••.
SCALE 1 "=500' FIGURE NO.
a . CALVIN MORRIS FIELD
DATE: 05-04-18 NC-AN-19 FIELD 1 10
laijillilleSOIL SOLUTIONS BUFFER MAP
PROJECT NO. 15-18 Ph:02 ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

'SU
f Rep noe wai A...7.1101170.0416.41
avfl oN 3M IMa flab d3MYlad itl3A
..p.r.e wado d 6'IAA'ORl t'V(Y^CI\;a--ki'dz�la;'i; c J: 39i 1�1Ec xa a �r
Z L MOLLYNlglq eNi moan d36va N35f 3N1AB N3NVl CNOLL7V ANY1q
O v� 'v.`Y 30YM Na9f.BA.....,,,...7gGe�dafsawlele SSleA A7V.711011 0 0416.MMVnn a3senasnLL 53a11e SANead'NV NO
MJR3O NDi 1NY31tllON 9 L AliO S3e0Aeld Tg101lMWDil11 iq!9 alHl 31 3.Y3Y- w13AV1Y1Y0 MO
ON 3Nnaf mar,9 Kj� * 391Bei�M
of a�uai X X. "Y t n s � ri x ,,.r,..
.wean+ _ • ^.s + `'*` •�"f" t �AR
weep 6 , ."� r.; i•s`..'S [ . �.,,y ^ 1 .
wed ■ 1 +, '"`+� �,.' r ...0.00.. s s
u •s` "i no-
o Z 0.0.a ■ . wA ram` tt r'' '
y n m enanns ♦ a x 3x '"' `fly`
o '1'n S Ppb eeuoy ' '"� ^4`,. �" O, ��f/ � a » >
i '- '-''''''' •-0//1;',, 7"'4 '''''''''' ''''A
14,441(11:::0 A'
''''''':41#./',A,"
. , -'• .+ "� t�. #s , - I 0,,, •
a+ /;f txis ,' +c p
.'llf
fizi.4
'1...i .,,,..„V 4 — -'-'7 cv,f, i
-i ..err e!!/f �/' Ire .
� :
t
"
r 6
� l + tili;'
t y, '"�// N _• Z-a I-Nf-3N PIMA
,l, ,,.
1-11L-Nf 3N PN1d /
T 9.Li SIT L'66 Vat-NCI 1� ddi
L
n�i 9'94 C IT £9S T9i Nfl 3N • , `. 4.,,••-tip 4(41 fr.
S31iltl 13N S3H3V O3d3iif9 S3tl)Y WWI Qi31d
vie uo lsaeldde Duel Isngsa/ayl D isasold'h N�a4JltDa'RnpWgq Z1ndoW in,
um.
✓ - ,", r i^ . °: V
>"J OS w can uogeotidde Duel sR•Wlsa,WJ woy Mq OSZ� N A DSVeR9else'A I , .. a „.
ays uo4eandde Duel Vea,o!R,epuno6 aoueydwo�ay1 AMYONf109 3�NYI3dwW * .,. " R x :11 �:
.° e-va uopealpde Duel""PIS"
���r« �'.. y>:i :-
e
a41 d n>auued aR Du Ricpunos
a7Ye11duN1�sy uswrsp �i - . . : _ ,F I` (�
sys uopeolOde Duel 4�Pnun W4sll4na eq IIe4s A3lYONIIOY IM33A3L 1// w

' � ' '` _
7 —114-
REYEIN stwNwRY aom a oaatlahed routs..dl t' aPPecilan alb
So
Ili°1if
U '";,. .`--,re* widw�r eM..R u»cawppre eouue�ry.oa a»w orn» o
residuals and iR N
/ '
Field NC-UN-18-7 s4�, COMPuuNOE BOUNDARY:The CanpWRu Bovwlaiy tar each and avvuation du In
r
a established r rather 250 Mt horn the residual*Md _ .
: `'�*.,/ `k + the PbPMY .altldEasar is abaaat m Or nwtlrl and MaOpBatlOp a s. C
t FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFEREDACRES NETACRES
J NC UN187 9.7 4.0 5.7
A N. A� 1 4 ~ NC•UN-134 20.6 4.6 16.0
'i
x..�a*. wig ° .-: /
a f ■
ii
¢ yew • r1
, '4,..„ f.,
�t m'I "A : a f 'r� r t q� e s ;..„
t '
:,,
, , `sEtm s t Field NC UN-188 04
:$1*: ---„*.L.,,,,,....4,5,„,„1,pe,,,,o,,,, s
/ Aipllpr..,
L� 11 _,.,•-
_
1 / "
F'/ 9 t 1 ril%k
.. cr
i'‘, . . , �` co 0
r`
+j ''t y
Q p
0
J 4F
I-
V)W a cC
al u, , .
} 3 ACcMSRoad `i Z E
4 € •• Wet Z m S
LL Z> O
.. .,. i ♦ swctWS m C. Z 1.
�y < N °welling 2 O
„, JE J • Gate i
--"lit
-n ' ,' +� _...-Streams o
s �A
A. lakes a
rvs- , 'a X X Fencdn, a
.r t _,.. ,. ®eufter s
nEFERENCE ,• 'spet ,, ..� u
OIS OATAIAYER.Y61E"'REUSES
'THERE
FROM ESRI,INC.PLEASE NOTE EMS MAP q FOR I FSU ASSUMES PURPOSES OILY. FO NOT MEAMT FOR I SIGN, -Field 80Ul�1Y IN
LEG"OR"0"'RUSES'THERE ARE NO OUARmTEESAe0UTR8ACCUACY MUSS ASSUMES SUNESPOK4a7lRY FOR ANY0EC610NMA0E ,� '•
OR ANY ACTIONS TAILS EY THE USER BASED UPON MIS IFOMATION. w 4 .PIa�Mly BOindary
t, _ +' a`.4Y M+t i5$SJ '': ti:_,_}:yth_- 9`''''r'. _ :`-=y) r31Y.,iao.I)RIO,Y.14.-_..ar. .. -

_- ___ ... _ _- __ _r _— --I:
. _ . _
r 1 , ■ Dwelling N m w yy�m,2
„.;
r - i } ! r,*',�' • .. d Lii
s- - IR Gate 3 U
Drain
. - �e�Fh� 141k m,,'- . —..-—streams o g
a+a"
r
CO cz,
v�}.ti: 6 jv.': -.d 4 II TJ
} 1 '� FI•Id NC-UN•26-6 Buller q� u
{ �. Field Boundary
a, h fr t - e� R. • .ri„,. Property Boundary S g
} _ ji .- . F n
$
I 1 $: / • A t�
' tiss 1 '�� a,r ^• 1 F....../..,,,_, .,,..... ..., ,..—„, �',.a A 1 ,°- -..e. r OZ
..... .
• �` Reid NC-UN-263 q t
ti E-
X. .
tY s ? _ `
.F ,t - '"
O J
,: N,L q' Field NC-UN-26.1 \ ' ( —�_ . •
O
s
A -
,f! I' ,..,
' Field NC-UN-26-6 s''
r. . t„ r►
M ;
: _ ... ...,
c li fy - SJ- /I • .
' , I •- _ •rev As. • F�'' A 5$•` % rsr! ' R
•
t`
�3. /' TI 1' ; a T ACRES BUFF ACRES N ES o
.. fit„ F u { NC-UN-D25-1 9.3 BUFFERED NET
LLI 0 tt
' '"'rc "'....:.- -... -` .."". �� .. NC-UN-25-3 19.0 4.4 1�
Field NC-U NC UN 26-1 25 2 8 8 16 6 W, w z 1
i - �. N-25 2 1 .4 C] r
t :/#t r" i'• ., NC-UN-26-2 7.2 0.7 6.5 N CD Z m Z i8
r..4 ^.. n (:. NC•UN-26 3 15.2 3.9 11.3 n 0 3
. •_ f-..r �•-' # ,.•,..A .,..r-� •�'o NC-UN-26-4 37.0 11.4 25.6 V z $
•- �~ i NC-UN-26 5 13.0 2.0 11.0 Z 2
II
r'
i i' �'• ;" NC-UN-26-6 36.4 8.7 27.7 7
x
I °` ;t - -- .._ REVEW BOUNDARY shall be established around each Land application sit* y
,q -j - -. midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter Maw
i ,1) - 6 l~ - tx - , - d residuals land application area. A
t r COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application sits S
•
Field NC UN-281 $- ',Ir.,' Is established at either 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet n‘.,...,.,., within the property boundary,whichever is closest to the residual land application area. 8
FIGURE N0. B
REFERENCE: J
�!• GIS DATA ILAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM Eon INC.PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR NFORMATONAL PURPOSES ONLY R B NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN 4
IEGM..OR ANY OTHER USES THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY%MSS ASSUMES NO RESPONSBSRY FOR ANY DECISION MADE
I'I DR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN SY THE USER BASED UPON THIS NFWMATRN

AN t
>. e Y•,/ Field NC-UN-25-3 P.
-. r
o Dwellingy v) alIll
Yt ,,,_
Gate• '� - a!
Dram
Field NC-UN-26-1 Streams o$
: ... _, t • -Lakes $ a=
c �. m o,T.,
Field NC-UN-26 S " (J' Q Field Boundary
,PropentY Boundry .A i
- - .• ' •dly -.4413 • ,. . ' ..* #.' ""j'N',..... "t 4 zo
„ ..
„.. . : .„ 4 ,,,, , „,,,, . . ,,,,,,,„ 1 E,_—
_' r
•
L 3. ,c - -s-TI .ice S ±y - J
,
.Y
, .
,,„ , , , :
..k t.
t'`
- ,, .,- z -.".,"?':-4'3 kt
:i.L
4„,„. ..t.m:.i.*Ii"t .RNLAIF ( 4 r `fi`"g ,r»r.. to Z
f
/�"� z: t , ' 0 CO U
.�• £ •/ ^4 W
Y `r' F^Erin fJ 7 f ,''' ' i T�." FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES IT W O
c "»µ1 i, M ;...."' •'T.,'"won 1 $r,... ,u° x".w,.. d': W ty w Z
+/c� °,. ," y, NG UN-26 1 25.2 8.8 16.4 u. - s
..-.,,,A t� +,+i` ., , NC-UN-26.2 7.2 0.7 6.5 m m� 9
. sr 4 11 j NC-UN-26-3 15.2 3.9 11.3 V
,,,. - NC-UN-2&4 37.0 11.4 25.6 z `
g
�"• 4 ,,, ' y� ".-;.,."' J iir) +..,. NC-UN-26-5 13.0 2.0 11.0 Z a g
i NIL.
a= AA*Ater ! m ' / NC•UN-26-6 36.4 9.9 26.5
�.�_ -. Z` B Held NC-UN-28� S
Jl,+ . t I I - ,,,Q ,. REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be atablished around each landapplication sib
r f''� -` r ^' ,`- midway between fhehe Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of eh,
y. r" '�,I -' T. *. • residuals land application area. d
y., MrP+ ^^^ -"'"' ^-i COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application site a
t., jA ,• ,� 0 t""r a ' . ' .' b established at ei1Mr 250 fat front tha residual,land applicationarea or 60 het
�a , r{yy - •� , _ ", whin properly boundary.whichever Is Memel tot a residualland application area. 4i
�C."S( ,. .,'(, S \ ,t*.� ..Y, f FIGURE NO Ice
FH, i -.- . / - 3 REFERENCE.
it,\* 4.'t T: , 'k r r }^ r, - - GIG DATA LAYERS WERE R EO FROM EMI INC.PLEASE NOTE THIS MAPS FOR NFORMATIO E$PURPOSES ONLY.IT IS NOT WANT FOR saac .
T. r LEON,OR ANY OVER USES THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUT nil ACCURACY.miss AssUNEa NO RE9PONSBIm FOR ANY OECMON MADE
- ., x +:. . • •.,..w •§ co ANY ACTIONS TAKEN Sy THE USER RASED UPON TMS MFORRATCN. 5

RAccess Road 1 co
N
EA
, • Structure
• co
• Gate Pr
, .,,,
Field NC-UN-27-2
1. Drain st .
—'-•-streams g =
o_
MNlakes ro O
.......... ........ ..... ___ Y�A Buffero
II Y
+....... i in
QField Boundary II g
Property Boundary
i
4 Z
o
f
p Field NC-UN-27-1 , El-
j
I y..„. 0AAli14,A41,
e rfr t 'Cri' (i( ^0
. ; 4 f . -
/.,, . �fl a //,yam✓/ p ' t 2
i 8
s' /
4 f _ G -ly
ei
_-�tt-'�.', ' .; II per ` / .fly T '
J� T
u ." " - II
i
v..a.� ; {Y,t^ a kt s'... uffirWaifsr T. ¢. s 0 , in 5
��� - $
;'"� ' X - ,,,� "�` ' '*� - FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES ? U
s .. w � R
z €
� " _ $ ? `q NC-UN-27-1 20.3 4.8 15.5 J 2 i i
., • i'• "A i NC•UN-27-2 27.3 8.9 18.4 D is
4
��,� �- - REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be established around each land application site
J4;n"' ,y +t .0 midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the
ric.° N51- , residuals land application area.
i r6- , f • _ ` li COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application site a
y'•"•"^'- -• - � , .--., is established at eithar 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet
` within the property boundary,whichever is closest to the residual land application area
'-. 4/6 .. ° - c. .. FIGURE NO.
. REFERENCE u
t GIS DATA LAYERS NERE°STAINED FROM Ens INC.PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR KORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.R IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN
LEGAL,ORANY OTHER USES.THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABC/FITS ACCURACY MASS ASSUMES NO RESP°NSSRTTY FOR ANY DECORN MADE 6
on ANY ACTIONS TAKEN SY THE USER BASE 0 UPON THIS INFORMATION,

A
i
.. .., ..,.. , , . ,, , _ _
, . .
Li
i
,
,
4 /}
it .: ddd /:/-
_�1 p 1ts-
72 --, „
' '' - ' {1 ,a,P../ 0 ..Q/:///,„i. ..,?1, 4.
, - " .411k' r,,,'''','/,', . ss, er:`, ..,,
.>>.,,,,dr ' ,.,:- ,
y #.CC
FIELD NC-UN-29-4 1
FIELD NC-UN-293
Legend 1
Amos Read
• Wall
• Wachs,
•
FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES Oareelq -
NC-UN-29-3 16.4 9.2 7.2 II Gate rt
Y' NC-UN-29-4 4.2 1.3 2.9 i $
— ._. Ditch 3
REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be established around*ash lend application sits _ _
midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the - - .f
6, residuary land application area
B COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY The Compliance Boundary for each land application site IIIII Paid
e
Is established at either 250 het from the residuals land application area or 50 Net
within the property boundary,whichever Is closest to the residual land application area. .; - IM Butfer
REFERENCE: [J Field Boundary r
GIB DATA LAYERS MITE OBTAINED FROM FSRI INC.PLEASE NOTE TNM NAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.RIB NOT A_ t
' i MEANT FOR OESIQI.LEGAL.OR ANY OTHER USES.THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOUTna ACCURACY.AMISS ASSUMES NO ` property Boundary IT
TH RESPONSIBILITY FORAM/DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY E USER BASED UPON TINS EIORANTgN '.A.4 I ( iq,_tpkra,EareL4;'ss-41Z974.;1dl,i:, ,• - LI
lad Gtil OW Oadiafility
1...7•E
1"=300' ROINI[N0.
e! WILLIAM GRIFFIN FIELDS
osls-1B `AA�/'�/--iQ—m'���p NC-UN-29 FIELDS 3.4
RAwN evMEM Ml1cox&mabe 71RaecTNO SOIL SOLUTIONS BUFFER MAP
15-18 Ph.02 UNION COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA

R
a
FIELD NC-UN-29-6
471
a ' 'Qt..
8 o \
d
,.,, A
. FIELD NC-UN-29.2
4/
: t--/'#7 , ,ik , ,0
0 ti
#r ; ./� /
1, 0 A - ,
kt, . /* ,,- ,
� �
i iY,
f 'fit •
I
t� .ice - �o ..
'7,/
iv-
FIELD NC-UN-29-1
•6 e
Legend
Access Road
• Nall
FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES - "' • Structure
NC-UN-29-1 32.8 8.3 24.5 • Dwelling
E
NC-UN-29-2 13.1 7.4 5.7 ■ Cele
NC-UN-29-S 7.1 4.9 2.2 Ditch
11 REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be establihed around each land application site `
.k. midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the - —••-~ dreams ;
residuals land application area.
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each and application site - Pond
l established at either 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet
within the property boundary,whichever Is closest to the residual land application area. ®Buffer o
ii
IIIIMS
REFERENCE: Q Field Boundary W
GIS DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRi INC.PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOr,FORMARONN.PURPOSES ONLY IT IS NOT e.�.,.,
MEANT FOR DESIGN.LEGAL,ORAN,'OTHER USES THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES ABOVE ITS ACCURACY.0MSS ASSUMES NO L Property Bounday A'
NE&resrsaLT'FOR ANY DECISION MADE ORANYACHONs WEN OVINE USER BASED UPON THIS RFORMATKI5 lii}tt444 gW.4,1A 3w.UJud'S uFja _:)�71ili,r.�' `LiF�
1, ‘170' I T I 8 +r-pLh LE FIGURE NO•_,_-_,!,.;,_„ WILLIAM GRIFFIN FIELDS
OS18-18MEIN ��^ NC-UN-29 FIELDS 1-2,dL bLw sv ox&rnabe VECT NO. SOIL SOLUTIONS BUFFER MAP
15-18 Ph:02 UNION COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA

IA
A
, . . ,
7,. _,_ ,,: , _:
_ I:.
FIELD NC-UN 10-B
i
4
FIELD NC-UN 30-4 ----C,
i
mac' 1 ' ` '"
O < _ #_ 0
ige
lie 1lir
e- "., 1 FIELD NC-UN-30-3
l . t1 a a
L.T' /
o
1.1
v•
OO. C1 FIELD NC-UN-30-2 0
OO
a O Q
0
FIELD NC-UN-30-1
O.
Legend
• Well
• Structure
FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES ■ Dwelling
NC-UN-30-1 16.7 3.6 13.1
NC-UN-30-2 14.6 2.7 11.9 ■ Abandoned Dwelling E
NC-UN-30-3 15.3 3.5 11.8 R
NC-UN-30-4 18.5 3.3 15.2 • Gate
NC-UN•b -S 11.3 0.5 10.8 X01
Drain
REVIEW BOUNDARY shalt be established around each land application site
midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the Pond
residuals land application area. E
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY The Compliance Boundary for each land application sib r
Is established at either 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet i/ Buffer
the property boundary,whkhsver Is closest to the residual land application eras. `, s
•Illillif =, - ar IV IS _--- ____ - Field Boundary a
REFERENCE: a
OM DATALAMERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRI INC PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP a FOR WEORAMTIONAI PURPOSES ONLY n IS NOT ,A. r W A•• -
1EArrrFpROESRNALEDAL,OR NIT OTHER USES.THERE ARE NO GUARANTEES Pamir in accuRAcy wsn5 ASSUMES NO I T.c v" `A•r_r a property Boundary
RESPOMSESfre FORANI'0EGOIUiwMOE OR ANY ACTIONS TAIEN eY DC USER RASED tWalTHIS NrORMARON
Mill ti
SCALE:
1,ate, R0111l NO.
+ a TOM APPENZELLER TRACT
pN1E 05-03-18 " NC-UN-30 FIELDS 1-5 (�
tsfAwN BY MEM Y Y��„I l e 9
PROJECT NO SOIL SOLUTIONS BUFFER MAP
15-10 Ph:02 UNION COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA I

A . i-r-
•
Field Nc-UNats ' * .: a, 4
—
tit ma •
8 0-
x`, t .gp
MPIIII
.� i. w
° s .,a s
h
ICIr 4z
Ill -.Q it
�a \ ..—
I
,�,. �.Q ., o
r t
J
`C Field NC UN 31j / ! s
04
••' _ �
ILJ
i, P.
• t
y '
/
IP
/tee .
Ir.
Jf M '��_#A k' ./��./a^lfia'` ,ci +� .�... L � Y
IP
' a:� , �� !ate m th K
r "1e` cry•,: - , u.Q U
; to s,-
i.. „ w ; Q'W
? Vj°t , IL LL w 2
a
' "r;"" q '.61
FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRE5 NET ACRES g aF 7 Z
Field NC UN.11.3 ' NC-UN-31-3 5.0 2.5 2.5 CC m at
1
Access Road L.
NC-UN-31-4 7.5 2.8 4.7 W U z I
• wee a NC-UN-31-5 21.9 4.3 17.6 € 2 Z Q 3g
{ 10♦ Structure
NC-UN-31-6 12.6 4.8 7.8 r #
R Deering •_,.
• Gale �. fi REVIEW BOUNDARY than be established sound each land application
n e
a midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the k+ residuals land application area. a
..•' Drain
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application ass j; a
street. '_.'" ' Is established at either 250 feet from tilt residuals land application arse or 50 feet I
r._.,., within the property beeadny.whichever le closest to the residual land application arse. i'
,nomt
.. Q Fed Boundary GM -_
1+ Ga MU LAYERS MIEAE MA FROM ESRL INC.PLEASE NOTE THa WP•FOR Ass N1R PURPOSES ONLY.n O NOT MEANT FOR DESGN,
{�. FMOpRIy Bo{edary LEGAL OR ANY OTHER USES THERE ARE MO GUARANTEES AeOUf Ire ACp11Y1GY FOR.
ASlLeaES NO ecatca SMnY iaR ANY DECISION Mice 1 0
�.,•^� + OR ANY ACTIONS TAIEN STD*USER BASED UPON TM NFOmNTIOt - 111

IllYRW someway shall be established around each land application aide , FIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES
midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of theA
'NC-UN-32-1 29.3 5.8 23.5
residuals land application area.
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application site NC-UN-32-2 19.3 3.8 15.5
10.0
A established at either 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet NC-UN-32-3 20.2 10.2
within the property boundary,whichever Is closest to the residue!l land application are
NC-UN-32-4 5.0 1.8 3.2
NC-UN-32-S 30.0 10.7 19.3
t• • 1
•
10
'�,,1 �' ` .
i i
fri
. ,*_ ‘
r ' a' 'el'i. 4:t ,,,
'rli " la s ' " p
e� a ` 9 r i EN ''�°fa
;t
11111 .
I::
iiiiiiik,o.
r♦
f
e I• s
i° f,� t� ,< r, - 1 Ari.r
* r a �t f *'} 0Pr. • ''' . Field NC-UN-32.1
— .Field NC-UN-32 2>-- ' .e :
x1 • �s
II
�� U ev
e . j .il� .. * 'lwl Field NC-UN-32-3h ..
C
t
Anderson es / 9Gc' « ,
Health ea ! .!
Services ..�
4 =
.,. >F�� •,tie Nasty RoAo�. ® N1 t F
lir/ /.•/a'' ...
f A• J
f 1 „' `
- � /
r
-- / - _
i
+ Legend
.' •
• wen
/. t ♦ n„ ♦ Structure
`..< .' =, ' ' • Dwelling
■ Gate
s Brush Pik
4 f /l Access Road 5tt
"fal?! 9
,1 111.11
Drain
'" $ 4 "?: streams
.. . takes
w
:�. * •;Butter o
J e
O Fold Boundary F
GO DOTALAYE L'i p
GIB DATA LAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ENE INC.PLEASE NOTE Ma NAP a FOR NFORINMONN.PURPOSES ONLY N s NOT _ 7$p'
MEANT FOR DESIGN,LEGAL D OR ANY RACER USES TIERS ARE NO GUARANTEES R ABOUT ITS ACCURACY.RMAI ASSUMES NO j Property Boundary
RESPONSIBILITY roe ANYDECISIDMMADE OR ANYACTIONSTAItEN SWINE USER BASED UPON TINS INFORMATION .1
M .... �eNeaww�a aa�. .a
SCALE. 1„e 5�, _ FIGURE NO
+ • DANNY BAKER FARM
DAB' 05-23.1e -^��/—' a� NC-UN-32 FIELDS 1-5 1
DRAwNev MEM V`�tp illcox&mabe 1 I 11
PROJECT NO SOIL SOLUTIONS BUFFER MAP
15-10 Ph:02 UNION COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA

ti REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be established around each land application site
midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the ►�,
residuals land application area.
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY:The Compliance Boundary for each land application site
Is established at either 250 feet from the residuals land application area or 50 feet f
within the property boundary,whichever is closest to the residual land application area. i, • A
i k
IFIELD TOTAL ACRES BUFFERED ACRES NET ACRES .`
11110
NC-UN-33-1 9.6 4.6 5.0
4
i
'., I _^� k
. r� r a., ' 4 rxa t 1,, 7y, , ��"'t•.Jg
t
d r - fir' t .
JF a f . ' 3 r a � '� Yi ps
.� fit. pleasai _ � � 1�, •) :�tI g�' ��a f
MI' '' ` 1 J ChVr i P .., e s ,l i y;s 1 a
A - Mt .1p**tivel fl ' ", , a . a
ar4,400til . 4
If
4"1""litilitAPA.—11, 4 , lit'1.41p# 4,,,,,,i; 41triiki;::: :4,*:413,* TtIN. 4,,,:e,
FIELD NC-UN-33-1 . 6 ,
: . ■t # �., ` + � i , a.r♦ : . � •. .41,1'1#0,'Niall
4"' � 4 • Well
jts
I ♦ Structure E
• `-' °eta ♦+ * ■ Dwelling
. ■t1 ' , , t e 1Access
Road
' ■ Ilk +4 *l ,. Drain
3 streams
5
as ,. ,i.: - �-, s �tiF- ,ice,-<. LL
a lakes r
� o
REFERENCE Butter
GIS DATALAYERS WERE OBTAINED FROM ESRI,INC. PLEASE NOTE THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL _
PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR DESIGN,LEGAL,OR ANY OTHER USES. THERE ARE NO Fleld Boundary
GUARANTEES ABOUT ITS ACCURACY. WMSS,PLLCASSUMESNO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY "S
DECISION MADE OR ANY ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE USER BASED UPON THIS INFORMATION. Property Boundary a
SCAL : 1 e=400, FIGURE NO
TED FUNDERBURK FARM
DATE: 05-30-18 NC—UN-33 FIELD 1 1 2
DRAWN bY. MEM
PROJECT No. SOIL SOLUTIONS
BUFFER MAP
15-10 Ph:02 UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA