19940284 Ver 1_Complete File_19940325

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources

512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
Steve Mr. Regulatory U.S. Army C
Room 75, Or
AEheville orps
Dve
...:...:..:. of En
Arcade
Caro gineers.
Building
lina 23801
,
-..:.a_: :.: 1....0..: ! ::
s rev
tabi iew :,,:
lizati an applicati
on along Meat on
Camp Creek,
W
atauga C
ounty
Dear Mr. Ch apin; ?
r Ear l Gr eene,
296071 is r eque sting a letter of c oncurrence f ro m the No rth
Carolina Wi ldlif e Res ources Commis i
(NCWRC) t bt
i 40-f

it
S
?
.
?
? s
on o o
a
n a
i.

perm
?...?:"f
isi:!::': U.
. ::!i
.:Y
i ....
-\..:i .. .:
i
.?I`

Engineers.

.. 1

have re

viewed
project pla
assess impa
in accordan ns ....
cts
ce wi

et . a .....,
on aqu
th pr

seq. ) is : ...:. .........
atic .reso6rce
ovisions of t

and the
Fish conducted ...
s. These co
he Clean Wat
and Wildlife
mm
er
C March 15
ents are
Act of
oDrdirat , 1994 to
provide-.-J
1977 (Z3'
ion Act
(49 Stat. 4
The ap
with riprap 01, a
plic
at 2 s ame
ant is
loca nded; 16 U.S.
proposing to
tions and rem C. 661-667d):
stabilize e
ove a gravel ,
rod
ba
ing str
r on hi
eam bankn
s
property.
PubliE MDun Work
tain will
Trout occur in Meat
Water,, Camp Creek wh ich is D eFignate--.J
The si
removal is
The site pr te vi
no lo
opose sit r
rgEr
d for evealed that
preiEwnt due t
riprap locat the gravel ba
o natural st
ed above the r
re
br WhQdUl
anbed mo
idge ap Ed for
vements,,
pears
stable and
hemlocks an
bank erosio hns g
d sma
n hu ood v
ll ha
t it i egetative cov
rdwoods.
s not severe. er in the fo

Two to thr rm

ee nf rhod

large r odendron,,

ocks are
scheduled f or pl aceme nt at this ar ea to prevent f urther ban!.::
BaEed
l on the site visit, the ri
d prap placement and grave l bar
remo
be n
LOnde
b
k va
pro
nEpsERr
VEUt pose
y. The left bank Appears
Work in this area and pos stable, even
sible loss of though Eom
existing ewhal't;
an
crit
plac
occu
this vegeta
ical ar
ement o
rred ab
locati tion may only accelerate
ea, the site below the br
f the proposed large rock
ove and below this site.
on may provide additional bank erosion.
idge may benef
s. Prior rock
The addition
fish cover,, While rot
it fro i
placement
of rocks a a

ha??:-.
t

to t During
. .... .
h the site visit the appli cant agreed to Nork only on
e
limi ted t: lower site on the pla n::
Thank you :.:. v.: the opportunity t o review and c omment on this
proj
at 9 ect. i
10-366- f
we can be of further as
R932. sistance, plea contact
se
Sincerely,
Original sign by
Joe hwo Y
jOS2ph H. Mickey, jr,,
District 7 ......:... :...
::...:::::
ECT Ms.
Mr.
M Stephanie %UdMaU, Mt. Region Habitat BiologiEt
jiMMY
Warren,
E
l S
r.
Mr. ar
reer;2
A! Child2rSv
I'$ . V
JAMES B. HUNT. JR.
GOVERNOR
A
?} V n ?C
•??Mrn Yd?a 2_
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
March 23, 1994
District Engineer
Army Corps of Engineers
P. 0. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 2
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch
Dear Sir:

SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
ITO,
MAR 2 51994
'D1

Subject: Watauga County, Replacement of Bridge No. 74 over
Meat Camp Creek on NC 194, Federal Aid Project
BRSTP-194(1), State Project 8.1751301, T.I.P. No.
B-1428.
Attached for your information are three copies of the
project planning report for the subject project. The project
is being processed by the Federal Highway Adm1nistration as a
"Categorical Exclusion" in accordance w' ;?3 CFR 771.115(b).
Therefore, we do not anticipate reques d-ng ap individual
permit but propose to proceed with a N tionw`id' Permit in
accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appendix (B-2), issued November
22, 1991, by the Corps of Engineers. The visions of
Section 330.4 and Appendix A (C) of ese gulations will be
followed in the construction of the p? t.
We anticipate that 401 General Certification No. 2734
(Categorical Exclusion) will apply to this project, and are
providing one copy of the CE document to the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources,
Division of Environmental Management, for their review.
We also anticipate that comments from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required prior
to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this
letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC review.
NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps
of Engineers.
c
K-r .. I

If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Ms. Robin Little at [phone].
Sincerely
. O'Q inn, PE
Assist Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
BJO/rml
cc: w/attachment
Mr, Steve Chapin, COE-Asheville
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Dorney, NCDEHNR, DEM
Mr. John Parker, NCDEHNR, DCM
w/out attachment
Mr. Kelly Barger, PE, Program Development Branch
Mr. Don Morton, PE, Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. John L. Smith, Jr., PE, Structure Design Unit
Mr. Tom Shearin, PE, Roadway Design Unit
Mr. W. E. Hoke, PE, Division 11 Engineer
Ms. Stacy Y. Baldwin, Planning and Environmental Branch
Mr. Davis Moore, Planning and Environmental Branch
v
Watauga County
NC 194
Bridge No. 74 Over Meat Camp Creek
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-194(1)
State Project 8.1751301
T.I.P. No. B-1428
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
.'
ATE H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
DATE icholas L. Gra , P.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Watauga County
NC 194
Bridge No. 74 Over Meat Camp Creek
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-194(1)
State Project 8.1751301
T.I.P. No. B-1428
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
February, 1994
Documentation Prepared By CARP'°`?C6
JBM Engineers and Planners
S EAL
. 1 ! 320
K nneth W. Smith P.E.
Project Manager
?0®a"a?a oa??cso4°°'0
for North Carolina Department of Transportation
I!f A. Bissett, Jr., P.E., Unit He
Consultant Engineering Unit
14 &/ 41,
Stacy Y. ald n
Project Manager
Consultant Engineering Unit
Watauga County
NC 194
Bridge No. 74 Over Meat Camp Creek
Federal-Aid Project BRSTP-194(1)
State Project 8.1751301
T.I.P. No. B-1428
Bridge No. 74 is included in the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The location
is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is
classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion".
I. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
A comprehensive archaeological survey of the proposed project will be conducted prior to
construction to identify the presence and significance of any archaeological remains at the
site. This survey is in response to a recommendation made by the Deputy State Historic
Preservation Officer in a memorandum dated January 26, 1993 (Attachment A).
The project is located in a "trout" county and was coordinated with the N.C. Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC). In response to recommendations made by the WRC
(Attachment B), the following environmental commitments will be fulfilled:
1. Construction will be prohibited during the trout spawning period of November 1
through April 15 in order to protect the egg and fry stages from sedimentation.
2. Disturbed riparian vegetation will be replanted upon project completion.
3. Upon removal of the temporary detour, disturbed areas will be reclaimed to match
pre-construction conditions.
All standard procedures and measures, including Best Management Practices, will be
implemented to avoid or minimize environmental impacts.
II. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Bridge No. 74 will be replaced at its existing location as shown by Alternative 1 in Figure
2. The recommended replacement structure consists of a quadruple 9'W x 10`H reinforced
concrete box culvert. This structure will be of sufficient length to provide two 12-foot
lanes with eight-foot usable shoulders (two feet of which will be paved) on each side.
The roadway grade of the new structure will be approximately the same as the existing
grade at this location.
The existing roadway will be widened to a 24-foot pavement throughout the project limits.
Traffic will be maintained during the construction period with an on-site temporary
detour. The temporary detour structure will consist of three 96" corrugated metal pipes.
Estimated cost, based on current prices, is $503,500. The estimated cost of the project, as
shown in the 1994-2000 Transportation Improvement Program, is $429,000, ($400,000-
construction; $29,000-ROW).
III. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project is located in the north-central portion of Watauga County, about 3.5 miles
north of the corporate limits of Boone (see Figure 1). The area is predominantly rural in
nature.
NC 194 is classified as a rural major collector in both the Statewide Functional
Classification System and the Watauga County Thoroughfare Plan. It is also a Federal
Aid Highway. NC 194 is also considered to be a North Carolina Scenic Byway and, in the
project vicinity is known as the New River Valley Byway. The North Carolina Scenic
Byways Program brings attention to scenic vistas in North Carolina. The New River
Valley Byway incorporates sections of NC 194 and NC 88 from Boone to Laurel Springs
for a length of approximately 40 miles.
In the vicinity of the bridge, NC 194 has a 20-foot pavement width with shoulder widths
of one to two feet (see Figures 3 & 4). The roadway grade is relatively flat across the
bridge and both approaches. The existing bridge is located on a tangent which extends
approximately 300 feet north and 700 feet south from the structure, providing adequate
sight distance in both directions. Curves of approximately nine degrees and seven degrees
are located to the north and south, respectively. The roadway is situated about 12 feet
above the creek bed.
The current traffic volume of 2100 VPD is expected to increase to 4200 VPD by the year
2015. The projected volume includes 2% truck-tractor semi-trailer (TTST) and 4% dual-
tired vehicles (DT). There is no speed limit posted through the project area, therefore the
speed limit is assumed to be the statewide maximum of 55 mph.
The existing bridge (see Figure 3) was constructed in 1927. Bridge No. 74 is a single-
span structure that consists of a reinforced concrete deck supported by reinforced
concrete thru-girders. The substructure is comprised of reinforced concrete abutments.
The overall length of the structure is 52 feet. The clear roadway width is 20 feet. There
are no posted weight limits on this bridge at the present time.
Bridge No. 74 has a sufficiency rating of 21.3, compared to a rating of 100 for a new
structure. The existing bridge is considered structurally deficient.
2
There are no utilities attached to the existing structure; however, there are overhead
power lines on the west side of the roadway through the project area.
Three accidents have been reported in the vicinity of Bridge No. 74 during the period from
May, 1989 to April, 1992. Two of the accidents were single-vehicle incidents that were
the result of the vehicles running off the road and striking fixed objects. The third
accident was a two car collision that was caused by icy road conditions. The three
accidents resulted in no injuries.
Nine school buses cross the studied bridge twice daily. Additionally, the Watauga County
Schools has an 800 gallon fuel truck that makes a daily round trip through the project
area.
IV. ALTERNATIVES
Two alternatives were studied for replacing Bridge No. 74. Each alternative consists of
replacing the existing structure at its present location. Construction of a replacement
structure on new location would result in a poor roadway alignment and would require a
substantial amount of fill material for the approach roadway construction.
The approach roadway for both alternatives will consist of two 12-foot lanes with eight-
foot usable shoulders (two feet of which will be paved) on each side. The proposed
typical section of the roadway through the area is included as Figure 4. For both
alternatives, a temporary on-site detour will be provided during the construction period
immediately west (upstream) of the existing structure. The temporary detour will consist
of three 96" corrugated metal pipes and will be located about 40 feet north of the existing
structure. The design speed of both alternatives is 60 mph.
The studied alternatives are shown on Figure 2 and are as follows:
Alternative 1 (Recommended) involves replacement of the structure along the existing
roadway alignment with a quadruple 9'W x 10'H reinforced concrete box culvert. The
proposed replacement structure will be of sufficient length to accommodate the roadway
typical section. This alternative is preferred because it is less costly to construct than
Alternative 2. Additionally, a culvert will generally be constructed in less time than will a
bridge, which reduces the exposure time of the traveling public to the construction work
zone and temporary detour.
Alternative 2 involves replacement of the structure along the existing roadway alignment
with a bridge 70 feet long providing a clear roadway width of 40 feet. The structure width
will accommodate a 24 -foot travelway with eight-foot shoulders. This alternative is not
recommended because of its higher construction cost.
3
The "do-nothing" alternative will eventually necessitate closure of the bridge. This is not
acceptable due to the traffic service provided by NC 194.
The Division Office concurs that traffic be maintained on-site instead of closing the road
during construction because of the traffic volumes using NC 194 and the excessive length
of additional travel that would be required with an off-site detour.
The Watauga County Schools' Director of Transportation, as well as the County's
Emergency Management Coordinator, indicate that maintenance of traffic on-site during
the construction period is preferable.
"Rehabilitation" of the old bridge is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated condition.
V. ESTIMATED COST
The estimated costs of the studied alternatives, based on current prices, are as follows:
Recommended
Alternative 1
Structure $ 87,700
Roadway Approaches 145,750
Detour Structure & Approaches 171,390
Structure Removal 5,160
Engineering & Contingencies 65,000
Right-of-Way/Construction Easements/Utilities 28,500
Total $ 503,500
VI. RECOMMENDED IlVIPROVEMENTS
Alternative 2
$ 196,000
172,450
171,390
5160
90,000
28,500
$ 663,500
Bridge No. 74 will be replaced at its existing location, as shown by Alternative 1 in Figure
2, with a quadruple 9'W x 10'H reinforced concrete box culvert. Improvements to the
existing approaches will be necessary for a distance of about 225 feet north of the
replacement structure and 225 feet south of the new structure.
A 24-foot pavement width with eight-foot usable shoulders (two feet of which will be
paved) on each side will be provided throughout the length of the project in accordance
with the current NCDOT Policy (see Figure 4). NC 194 is classified as a rural major
collector; therefore, criteria for a rural major collector was used for the structure
replacement. The design speed is 60 mph.
4
During the construction period, maintenance of traffic at the existing bridge is necessary.
Otherwise, traffic would have to be detoured along existing secondary roads. This detour
route is considered unacceptable due to the traffic volumes using NC 194 and the
excessive length of additional travel required.
Based on a preliminary hydraulic analysis, the new structure is recommended to be a
quadruple 9'W x 10'H reinforced concrete box culvert. It is anticipated that the elevation
of the new roadway will be approximately the same as the existing roadway. The final
design of the culvert will be such that the backwater elevation will not encroach beyond
the current 100-year floodplain limits. The dimensions of the new structure may be
increased or decreased as necessary to accommodate peak flows as determined by further
hydrologic studies.
VII. NATURAL RESOURCES
A biologist visited the project site on January 20, 1993 to verify documented information
and gather field data for a thorough assessment of potential impacts that could be incurred
by a proposed bridge replacement project.
The investigation examined the vegetation surrounding the highway bridge in order to 1)
search for State and Federally protected plants and animal species; 2) search for unique or
prime-quality communities; 3) describe the current vegetation and wildlife habitats; 4)
identify wetlands; and 5) provide information to assess (and minimize adverse)
environmental effects of the proposed bridge replacement.
Biotic Communities
Plant Communities
Two natural plant communities occur within the study area, Alluvial Forest and Dry-Mesic
Oak--Hickory Forest. The riparian area immediately adjacent to Meat Camp Creek is
narrow and grades into Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest. A man-dominated community
occupies most of the project area.
The riparian community is a sparsely vegetated alluvial forest community. Vegetation
consists of sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), and
locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia) in a sparse tree layer. The understory is comprised of
blackberry (Rubus sp.), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), and tag alder (Alnus
serrulata). This community is more developed further away from the project site, at the
base of the oak-hickory forest community to the south. Other species noted include
redbud (Cercis canadensis), red oak (Quercus rubra), and elm (Ulmus americana).
5
Adjacent to the riparian community are man-dominated areas. Pasture land is most
prevalent with vegetation consisting of fescue (Festuca sp.), rye (Lolium sp.), dandelion
(Taraxacum off cinale), clover (Trifolium sp.) and plantain (Plantago sp.).
The forest community to the south consists of a mixture of hardwood species including
hickory (Carya sp.), oaks (Quercus spp.), white pine (Pinus strobus), poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis).
Wildlife (General)
Riparian communities are valuable habitat for reptiles and amphibians. Amphibians in
particular are highly water dependent for completion of larval stages in their life cycle and
some species are totally aquatic.
Reptiles and amphibians likely to occur in the project vicinity include eastern box turtle
(Terrapene carolina), northern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus) five-lined skink
(Eumeces fasciatus), queen snake (Regina septemvittata), eastern ribbon snake
(Thamnophis sauritus), mountain dusky salamander (Desmognathus ochraphaeus), white
spotted slimy salamander (Plethodon cylindraceus), and green frog (Rana clamitans).
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission reports that Meat Camp Creek is
designated as hatchery-supported public mountain trout waters and that a wild population
of brown trout (Salmo trutta) is also present. Other fish species likely to inhabit Meat
Camp Creek include creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), shiners (Notropis sp.), dace
(Rhinichthys sp.), darters (Etheostoma sp.), and mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi). The
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission recommends that a spanning structure be
constructed at this site to preserve instream and riparian habitat, reduce the potential for
blocking fish passage, and to limit the potential for thermal pollution that could result from
the widening of the channel. They also requested that construction be prohibited during
the trout spawning period of November 1 through April 15 in order to protect egg and fry
stages from sedimentation, (see Attachment B). The NCDOT will consider the Wildlife
Resources Commission's comments during the design and permitting phases of the project.
A final decision will then be made regarding the type of replacement structure that will be
used at this location.
While most of the surrounding area is open pastureland, some forested communities are
nearby, providing passageways and refuges for mammals forced from more disturbed
upland sites. Small mammals that are likely to inhabit the cleared areas include eastern
mole (Scalopus aquaticus) and mice (Peromyscus sp.). Larger mammals, including
opossum (Didelphis marsupialis), raccoon (Procyon lotor), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus
floridanus) and deer (Odocoileus virginianus), are likely to inhabit nearby forested and
brush covered areas. Other mammals likely to be found in the area include bats (Lesiurus
sp. and Myotis sp.), mink (Mustela vison) and longtail weasel (M. frenata).
6
Birds likely to inhabit the study area include the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), red-
tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), killdeer (Charadrius vociferus), eastern bluebird (Sialia
sialis), eastern meadowlark (Sturnella magna), American goldfinch (Carduelis tristis),
and song sparrow (Melospiza melodia).
Soil
Physical Resources
Soil series located within the project area are presented and summarized below:
SOIL SERIES
Chewacla loam (Ch)-
0 to 2% slopes
Congaree cobbly fine
sandy loam (Cs)-
0 to 2% slopes
CLASSIFICATION
Hydric*
Non-hydric
HYDRIC INCLUSION
Hatboro
None
* - some phases of this soil are not frequently flooded of long duration
Chewacla loam (0-2% slopes) occurs on first bottoms and consists of a mixture of
materials originating chiefly from gneiss, schist, and granite. The soil is typically flooded
by adjacent streams about once every 2 to 3 years. Surface runoff is slow and internal
drainage is slow, restricted by a high and fluctuating high water table. The soils are not
well-drained in the vicinity of the project. This soil type is classified as prime farmland if
either drained or protected from flooding during the growing season. The soils in the
vicinity of the project appear to be drained and suitable for farming.
Congaree cobbly fine sandy loam (0-2% slopes) is distinguished by the presence of many
cobblestones on the surface and in the profile. The texture varies from place to place but
surface soil is typically a gravelly loam or loamy sand. The cobblestones are waterworn
and are usually abundant to the point of interfering with tillage. While much of this soil is
in crops or pasture, the cobblestones, moderately low water-holding capacity, and low
plant-nutrient content make it less suited to many crops than other Congaree soils. This
soil is classified as prime farmland.
Water
This bridge replacement project spans Meat Camp Creek, a tributary to South Fork New
River, contained within the New River basin. An alluvial floodplain, comprised of sparse
hardwood vegetation, is adjacent to the creek.
Meat Camp Creek has a "best usage" classification of "C-Tr". Class C designates waters
suitable for secondary recreation, aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife
7
and agriculture. The supplemental classification of Tr (Trout) indicates waters suitable for
natural trout propagation and maintenance of stocked trout. As previously mentioned, the
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission has indicated that Meat Camp Creek is designated as
hatchery supported public mountain trout waters, and that wild brown trout are also
present.
The Benthic Macroinvertebrate Ambient Network (BMAN), managed by the North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management, addresses the long term trends in water quality at fixed
monitoring sites by the use of benthic macroinvertebrates. These organisms are sensitive
to very subtle changes in water quality. Specific data for Meat Camp Creek are not
available. However, the South Fork New River, Meat Camp Creek's receiving stream,
was sampled at the SR 1355 bridge, approximately five miles downstream from the
proposed project location. Sampling efforts at this location were conducted in July, 1988,
resulting in a "good" bioclassification rating. During this survey, it was noted that water
quality in the South Fork New River improved as it went downstream. The Town of
Boone Wastewater Treatment Plant is permitted to discharge 3.2 million gallons per day
(MGD) into the South Fork New River. This plant is located approximately five miles
upstream from the mouth of Meat Camp Creek into the South Fork New River.
Table 1 describes the stream characteristics of Meat Camp Creek observed in the vicinity
of the proposed bridge replacement project.
TABLE 1
Observation Point U stream 100 ft. Existing Crossing Downstream 100 ft.
Substrate Boulder, cobble, gravel, silt
Current Flow Moderate
Channel Width (ft.) 15-20 15-20 15-25
Bank Height (ft.) 5-8 2-4 3-6
Water Depth (ft.) 2-4 2-4 1-4
Water Color Clear Clear Clear
Water Odor None
uatic Ve elation None
Z
'accent Vegetation Hardwood fringe - sycamore, locust, oak, alder
Wetlands Bank to Bank
The general gradient of Meat Camp Creek is moderate and riffle-pool ratios are balanced
through the project area. Though some flats are developed behind the riffle areas,
sediment loads will, for the most part, be carried downstream from the project site. The
stream banks are high enough to contain annual storm events and overtopping floods
would be contained within the adjacent floodplain terrace.
8
Jurisdictional Topics
Wetlands
No wetland plant communities will be affected by this project. The stream banks are steep
and well drained and wetland hydrology does not occur in the adjacent communities.
Protected Species
Under federal law, any federal action which is likely to result in a negative impact to plants
and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), Proposed
Endangered (PE) and Proposed Threatened (PT) is subject to review by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS) under one or more provisions of the Endangered Species Act of
1973. In the case of state-funded actions, where federal wetland permits are likely to be
required, for example, the FWS can require consultation to insure that the proposed action
does not jeopardize any endangered, threatened or protected species. Even in the absence
of federal actions, the FWS has the power, through provisions of Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act, to exercise jurisdiction on behalf of a protected plant or animal.
The FWS and other wildlife resource agencies also exercise jurisdiction in this resource
area in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended;
16 USC 661 et seq). North Carolina laws are also designed to protect certain plants and
animals where statewide populations are in decline. Plants or animals with state
designations of Endangered (E), Threatened (T) or Special Concern (SC) are granted
protection by the State Endangered Species Act and the NC Plant Protection and
Conservation Act of 1979. These Acts are administered and enforced by the North
Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and the NC Department of Agriculture.
The FWS and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) were consulted to
identify the potential for occurrences of protected species in the project study area.
Federally Listed Species:
Information from the FWS dated September 20, 1993, indicates that there are six federally
protected species listed in Watauga County (see Table 2). Each species and its
relationship to the proposed project are discussed on the following pages.
9
TABLE 2
COMMON NAME SPECIFIC NAME STATUS
Virginia big-eared bat Plecotus townsendii virginianus E'
Carolina northern Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus E
flying squirrel
Roan Mountain bluet Hedyotis purpurea var. montana E
Spreading avens Geum radiatum E
Heller's blazing star Datris helleri T2
Blue Ridge goldenrod Solidago spithamaea T
E' - Endangered: A taxon that is threatened with extinction throughout all of its range.
TZ - Threatened: A taxon that is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future.
Virginia big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii virginianus)
The Virginia big-eared bat is distinguishable by its very large ears, usually P or longer.
This medium sized bat has brownish fur and is approximately 4" long. The species is
widespread in the western United States, but the eastern subspecies is fragmented into
several populations. It inhabits caves only. Hibernation sites average 12° C or less.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
No caves are located in the study area. No impacts to this species will occur.
Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus)
The Carolina northern flying squirrel is a small nocturnal mammal approximately 12"
long. It is capable of gliding by means of a membrane that is located along the sides of
the body between the fore and hind limbs. Also, its broad tail aids in gliding. The
Carolina northern flying squirrel is distributed in widely scattered areas in the transition
zone between the coniferous and northern hardwood forests.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The study area does not support suitable habitat for the Carolina northern flying
squirrel. No impacts to this species will occur.
Roan Mountain bluet (Hedyotis purpurea var. montana)
This perennial herb has a basal rosette of leaves. The flowers are a bright yellow and
the flowering period is from June through September. The Roan Mountain bluet
inhabits high-elevation, rock cliffs.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The study area does not support suitable habitat for this plant; therefore, no impacts to
this species will occur.
10
Spreading avens (Geum radiatum)
This perennial herbaceous plant is a member of the rose family. The flowers are bright
yellow and the flowering period is from June through August. It is endemic to balds
on high mountains and often occurs on steep mountain faces and narrow ledges.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The study area does not support suitable habitat for this plant; therefore, no impacts to
this species will occur.
Heller's blazing star (Liatris hellen)
Heller's blazing star is a member of the aster family. Flowers occur in clusters and are
rarely solitary, blooming late July through August, from the top to the bottom of the
stem. Flowers are lavender to pink or white. The plant occurs on drier mountaintop
cliff edges, in shallow, acidic soils, usually on weathered granite above 3,500 feet in
elevation.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The study area does not support suitable habitat for this plant; therefore, no impacts to
this species will occur.
Blue Ridge goldenrod (Solidago spithamaea)
The Blue Ridge goldenrod is an erect perennial herb that arises from a stout rhizome.
The yellow flowers are borne in heads and the flowering period is July through
August. The Blue Ridge goldenrod occurs at elevations above 4,600 feet in dry rock
crevices of granite outcrops on the high peaks of the Blue Ridge Mountains.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The study area occurs well below 4,600 feet and does not support suitable habitat for
this plant; therefore, no impacts to this species will occur.
The FWS also identified candidate species, (species that are currently under status
review), that may occur in the project study area. A list of these species is provided in
Table 3, on the following page.
11
TABLE 3
COMMON NAME SPECIFIC NAME SUITABLE HABITAT
New England cottontail * Sylvilagus transitionalis No
Hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganiensis No
Cerulean warbler Dendroica cerulea No
Tennessee heelspliter Lasmigona holstonia No
Green floater Lasmigona subviridus No
Kanawha minnow Phenocobius teretulus No
Diana fritillary butterfly Speyeria dana No
Tall larkspur Delphinium exaltatum No
Bent avers Geum geniculatum No
liverwort * Bazzania nudicaulis No
Mountain bittercress * Cardamine clematitis Yes
Bog bluegrass * Poa paludagena No
Butternut Juglans cinerea No
Gray's lily Lilium grayi No
Gray's saxifrage Saxifraga caroliniana No
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii No
* Indicates no specimen from Watauga County in at least 20 years.
State Listed Species:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program reports two species considered significantly
rare in the vicinity of the proposed project. These are the tongue-tied minnow
(Exoglossum laurae) and marsh marigold (Caltha palustris). Impacts to the minnow can
be reduced by adhering to all best management practices for the control of erosion and
runoff. The marsh marigold is a bog-inhabiting species. The preferred alternative does
not impact wetland areas or bogs; therefore, impacts to this species will not occur.
Impacts
The preferred alternative consists of replacement of the structure at its existing location.
A temporary detour will be used to maintain traffic during the construction period.
Construction of the new structure and approach roadways will impact the ecological
community. Portions of the riparian and upland hardwood communities will be destroyed
by land clearing, excavation, filling, draining and paving. As a result, these communities
will be altered and, consequently, the habitat quality lessened to some degree. During
construction, efforts will be made to minimize impacts to the riparian and hardwood
forest communities.
Approximately 0.11 acre of riparian habitat will be impacted by the new construction.
These losses are relatively small compared to the amount of similar habitats that are found
in the region.
12
Impacts due to the proposed project will mainly affect aquatic organisms. Dredging,
filling, pile-driving operations, slope stabilization, and land clearing are construction
activities which can result in the direct loss of benthic organisms due to an increase in silt
load. The removal of benthic organisms reduces the potential food supply for fish and
other vertebrates.
Project construction may result in a number of potential impacts to Meat Camp Creek.
Construction of the new structure, as well as the construction and removal of a temporary
detour could create short-term increases in siltation and sedimentation in Meat Camp
Creek. Fill material placement for the approach roadway may enter the stream, and
construction of the proposed structure could result in increased turbidity both on-site and
downstream of the project area. Other impacts might include alterations to water levels
and flow due to interruptions or additions to surface and/or groundwater flow; increased
concentration of toxic compounds from construction, and reductions to sensitive
invertebrate species due to alterations in water clarity and light-incidence resulting from
increased turbity. However, these potential impacts are avoidable. Appropriate measures,
consistent with Best Management Practices, will be implemented during the term of the
project to minimize, control and/or contain the potential impacts.
Unique and/or Prime-Quality Habitat. The Alluvial Forest community is not uncommon
but few examples remain intact. The Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest community is
common and small tracts are intact and/or protected. Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest
communities of significant size are relatively rare, however.
Meat Camp Creek is not a designated wild or scenic river.
Permit Coordination
In accordance with provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.O.E.
1344), a permit will be required from the Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into "Waters of the United States". In addition, the project is located in a
designated "trout" county where NCDOT is required to obtain a letter of approval from
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and provide it to the Corps of
Engineers.
Since the subject project is classified as a Categorical Exclusion, it is likely that this
project will be subject to the Nationwide Permit Provisions of 33 CFR 330.5 (A) 23. This
permit authorizes any activities, work and discharges undertaken, assisted, authorized,
regulated, funded or financed, in whole or in part, by another federal agency and that the
activity is "categorically excluded" from environmental documentation because it is
included within a category of actions which neither individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the environment. However, final permit decisions are left to the
discretionary authority of the United States Army Corps of Engineers.
13
Foundation investigations will be required on this project. The investigation will include
test borings in soil and/or rock for in-site testing as well as obtaining samples for
laboratory testing. This may require test borings in streams and/or wetlands. These
activities will require authorization under Nationwide Permit No. 6.
A 401 Water Quality Certification, administered through the N.C. Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources, will also be required. This certificate is
issued for any activity which may result in a discharge into waters for which a federal
permit is required.
Compensatory mitigation is not required under a Nationwide permit. Erosion and
sedimentation control measures will be strictly enforced during construction activities to
minimize unnecessary impacts to stream and wetland ecosystems. Best Management
Practices will also be implemented. Fill material from the temporary detour within the
floodplain will be removed and the area restored, to the extent reasonably possible, to
promote regeneration of the pre-construction conditions.
VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is considered to be a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope
and insignificant environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
No adverse impact on families or communities is anticipated. Right-of-way acquisition
will be limited. No relocatees are expected with implementation of the proposed
alternative.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is expected. The project is not expected
to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned parks, recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl
refuges of national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, implemented by the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
14
It is also subject to compliance with Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act
of 1966, as amended.
Correspondence with the State Historic Preservation Officer (Attachment C) indicates
there are two structures of historical or architectural importance within the general area of
the project: the Avery Greene House, and the Greene House, both located at the
intersection of SR 1324 and NC 194, about 0.4 miles southwest of the project site.
The Area of Potential Effect as determined by the Department, is depicted in Figure 5.
There are no structures within the Area of Potential Effect that are eligible for inclusion in
the National Register of Historic Places. The existing bridge itself is not historically
significant. There are no recorded architectural sites eligible for the National Register in
the proposed project area. Although there are no recorded archaeological sites in the
proposed project area, the Deputy North Carolina Historic Preservation Officer in a
memorandum dated January 26, 1993 (Attachment A), recommended an archaeological
survey of the proposed project area. Therefore, an archaeological survey of the proposed
project area will be conducted prior to construction.
Since there are no properties either listed on or eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places within the APE, no further compliance with Section 106 is required with
respect to historic properties.
This project has been coordinated with the U.S. Soil Conservation Service. The Farmland
Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives to consider the
potential impact to prime farmland of all land acquisition and construction projects. With
the exception of the construction of a temporary detour, all work will be done within the
existing right-of-way. Therefore, the project will not involve the direct conversion of
prime, unique or important farmland acreage.
The project is located within the jurisdiction for air quality of the Winston-Salem Regional
Office of the N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. The
ambient air quality for Watauga County has been determined to be in compliance with the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This project is not anticipated to create any
adverse effect on the air quality of this attainment area.
This project will not substantially increase traffic volumes. Therefore, the impact on noise
levels and air quality will be insignificant. Noise levels could increase during construction
but will be temporary. If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in
accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North Carolina State
Implementation Plans for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520.
This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for noise analysis of Title 23, Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 772 and for air quality of the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments and the National Environmental Policy Act.
15
An examination of records at the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section and the
North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Solid Waste Management Section
revealed no underground storage tanks or hazardous waste sites in the project area.
Watauga County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Regular Program. The
approximate 100-year floodplain limits in the project area is shown in Figure 6. Although
the project is located in the 100 year floodplain, the amount of floodplain area to be
affected is not considered to be significant.
There are no practical alternatives to crossing the floodplain area. Any shift in alignment
would result in a crossing of about the same magnitude. All reasonable measures will be
taken to minimize any possible harm. The final design of the structure will be such that
the backwater elevation will not encroach beyond the current 100-year floodplain limits.
In the vicinity of the project, there is a fire department building, a convenience store/gas
station, and a single family residence located within the limits of the 100-year floodplain.
Other structures within the flood limits include barns and storage sheds.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no serious adverse environmental
effects will result from implementation of the project.
16
A
u
r
-01N. IN,
J. Zionvill
?W ,"A T A U G A' T
(! erwoo 94
ar Grov
9 ilas oone
ech Valle 6
Ao?ain Crucis ` S.
194 10 cnw -
M8rt1 $
Seven 5k
i Deyils 1 Po?k?
6lV
221 B18u
hit °F *Mrs( S'+o` NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
9~f?f Of rn?•s°PF BRANCH
WATAUGA COUNTY
NC 194
BRIDGE NO. 74 OVER
MEAT CAMP CREEK
B-1428
----- ---- RnnO ti
1340 MTN.
Pleasant -. 194
.' q
Valley
Ch
s?,?f•'
1369
.
1399
?6
2 .4
t f+ t' 1335 1349 a
1340 I
.6 Meat
i Camp
s
.6 a• iti '_r
1403
1377 ,4
1339
w 1339
1377 1349
?t 31396 ,6 v
46
8
1335
1337 1 38 m ^ •4
7'0. 1337 1364 ?_. 1350 1350

1324 •' ,
1336
9 St. 1351

3
8 ?
. .
.3

? 1334
Y¢
? 1395

b
BRIDGE NO. 741,
1322
325
It
._,
%?4 1327
1325 T 1.8 1333
, •9

6 cr 1333 1331
132
?S 1379
1320 Sci ds h
06 2.4
1
Q
•6
1332 ?
01 .4
0 Deep-Gap 1318 Qr C4

Z

1393 N

1328

SOUTH
wA
ARK : HOWARD KNOB
? _
- 1331 .8
1391
?. ELEV. 4445 b ? 3
: ?.
?
. •
*?
?` , ?
<
.,.n• N ^ .9
•2
?
ng Rock 194
.??? 221 1'3 1512
URBAN 421
?• :.x•:: ` Y MT

0 1 2

SCALE
i (mi)
FIGURE 1

k, N
O w
z H ?
C7
? ? LL
? z
0
w ¢ ? ?
w
F- w
°
O W = O? r-
.a E+ x A

H d O 'a V
00
v?naN

~
C4

U O z

Z
U m
`w
x W
Fx" V) u
d Q O G
?
o a
A. -

?
3 co o
A
. as

O ;
. ' t

\
fl

sf
Ei t i
ry
W

:3aa?a. ,._,, .,. ski '9?•` . ?bb{l:q ?,

.a-.' ...E
f:
?. M
N
W
> w
F- (D
Z
W m
F-
J
Q
r 0
LLI
0
cr- W
LLJ w O
Z J
U U
J w
Q CC
EF
C 3ano13
H1nos 9ND1001
HOVOaddv HIHON
HIHON ONIN001
HOVOaddv H1nos

M31A MIS
HtL-8
t,L 'ON 3Jala8
,00 vonvlvnn
t6 L ON
f
rf. .
T_
C)
c
m
m
-41
r ?G
CCA Ch I•
If If
II
C N N
+ < 3
Cl) CL
=r w
°c = Q
?. °c :r
c?

D
a
a
N O O

CD
CD
)
c
Q
D
y
r

a M
o
0-0
v N N o p 0
(A CA >
Q_ = p =
cn
m
n

O
Z
y+l C tj+
?y
'f
f
s^?
?r
?+t?oit •'A'c
m
r
p
D arod-3z
a? ;
r
n
-Dim D
Az
Oro
W
n
ASP z c
- D xzz0fy?
00%0a
00 " ?0
04 o
c x
=0
mm
z <Fz>
O
i
v
i
z
m
?
z
-i
O
?n
U
Ir
e
s
Ie
I O

I
D
r
M D
X ?
tt-) D
Z
5 0
N
m
n
O
Z
7

CA
Cl)

r"' 1
G

y
GEE _ V
N
M
.`
V
v
Z
_ LLB

° w
D
a
H d ?
z LL
H
x ?
z
w a?

LLJ
o
o?w oc
r
O Q x Z
w ?v U
raN F-
°
U o z QC
?z
ZL w
x
a )
NZ V) Q Z
x "
o
9 ?
-
a "a
w
°
2
o
9 A
a
3 co
?
lot/,
,• s
o ;°
11
tI
) I
I I

ZONE A
-!?r N
rn
Z
MEgT CgNIP
X350
ONE C
NC?
794
I BRIDGE NO. 74 1

I
J
\ N
N

r-- . r
/r
%OOto NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ifs er iu?S??. BRANCH
WATAUGA COUNTY
NC 194
BRIDGE NO. 74 OVER
MEAT CAMP CREEK
B-1428
FIGURE 6
f- {3
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Ilunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
January 26, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
Department of Transportation
FROM: David Brook t
Deputy State Histl Tic Preservation Officer
rCtre? G1L?? 'G(talY?
C.Lp)
Division of Archives and History
Director
,
t:
FEB 0 1 1993
i
t 4!?l?,;. ,,GAL
SUBJECT: Replace Bridge No. 74 on NC 194 over Meat Camp
Creek, Watauga County, B-1428, ER 93-7957
Thank you for your letter of December 18, 1992, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a search of our maps and files and have located the following
structures of historical or architectural importance within the general area of the
project:
Avery Greene House. Corner of the junction of SR 1324 and NC 194. The
Avery Greene House is a two-story late nineteenth century farmhouse which
has not been evaluated for National Register eligibility.
Greene House. Corner of the junction of SR 1324 and NC 194. The Greene
House is a large two-story nineteenth century farmhouse with ornamental
porches which has not been evaluated for National Register eligibility.
Please notify us if there are any additional structures over fifty years of age in the
area of potential effect.
There are no known recorded archaeological sites within the project boundaries.
However, the project area has never been systematically surveyed to determine
the location of significance of archaeological resources.
We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced
archaeologist to identify the presence and significance of archaeological remains
that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed project. Potential effects on
unknown resources should be assessed prior to the initiation of construction
activities.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
ATTACHMENT A-1
L. J. Ward
January 26, 1993, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
DB:slw
cc: Nicholas Graf
B. Church
T. Padgett
ATTACHMENT A-2
_Esz' North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission K
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Stephanie E. Goudreau, Mt. Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: April 6, 1993
SUBJECT: Scoping comments for replacement of a bridge on NC 194
over Meat Camp Creek, Watauga County (TIP #B-1428)
This memorandum responds to a request by you to Mr. Joe
Mickey of the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC) regarding plans by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) to replace a bridge on NC 194 over Meat
Camp Creek in Watauga County. Staff field biologists have
reviewed the information provided and conducted a site visit on
April 5, 1993.
Meat Camp Creek is Hatchery Supported Designated Public
Mountain Trout Water and contains populations of stocked trout
and wild brown trout. The NCWRC has the following comments and
recommendations regarding this project:
1) Construction should be prohibited during the trout spawning
period of November 1 through April 15 in order to protect
the egg and fry stages from sedimentation.
2) The existing structure she id be replaced with another
spanning structure rather ..}an a quadruple 111x 9'
reinforced concrete box culvert to reduce the potential for
blocking fish passage and also for widening of the channel
at the site and creating a shallow, unproductive area prone
to thermal pollution.
3) We concur that the proposed detour site located immediately
upstream (north) of the existing structure is the most
desirable in regards to minimizing disturbance to the
riparian zone.
ATTACHMENT B-1

4) Where riparian zone vegetation will be disturbed, we
recommend carefully removing shrubs and small trees so that
they can be replanted upon project completion.
5) Upon removal of temporary detour culverts, disturbed areas
should be reclaimed to match pre-construction conditions
(same stream width, depth, slope, bank slope and riparian
vegetation).
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information in
the early planning stages of this project. If you have any
questions regarding these comments, please contact me at 704/652-
4257.
cc: Mr. Joe Mickey, District 7 Fisheries Biologist
Mr. David Yow, Highway Project Coordinator, NCWRC
ATTACHMENT B-2
a`a` STNE °
North Carolina Department of Cultural
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
July 16, 1993
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replace Bridge No. 74 over Meat Camp Creek on
NC 194, Watauga County, B-1428, 8.1751301,
BRSTP-194(1), ER 93-9056
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division
C E
Q? E
J ?II11' Z 1 1993
Thank you for your letter of June 16, 1993, concerning the above project.
We have reviewed the information provided to us regarding structures located in
the area of potential effect. Based upon this information, we concur with the
Federal Highway Administration's determination that the Avery Greene House and
the Greene House are located outside the area of potential effect. We also concur
that Bridge No. 74--the only structure over fifty years of age in the area of
potential effect--is not eligible for National Register-listing since the bridge has
substantially deteriorated and lost integrity. Thus, no National Register-listed or
eligible properties are located in the area of potential effect.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
cerely,
r
David rook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw/
cc: Vt. J. Ward
B. Church
109 East Jones Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807
ATTACHMENT C
_01
Q3
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE
TRANSMITTAL SLIP L
.. REF. .N -OR RO M, BLDG.
FROM: - REF:. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
ACTION
? NOTE AND. FILE ? PER OUR 'CONVERSATION
?NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER. YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH. MORE. DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL..
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? `PLEASE ANSWER ?, FOR. YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
- ?. . TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:

? s
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
Mr. Steve Chapin
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Field Office
Regulatory Branch
Grove Arcade Building, Room 75
February 22, 1995
37 Battery Park Avenue
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2714
Dear Mr. Chapin:
SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 74
.County, COE Action I. D. No.
and TIP Project No. B-1428.
q(4Z? 7?

R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
FEB / 'In
2 11995
over Meat Creek on NC 194 in Watauga
199402011, State Project No. 8.1751301
On June 16, 1994 this project was authorized to proceed under Nationwide
Permit (NWP) No. 23. The Hydraulics Unit of the NCDOT has since finalized
the design plans for the project and has slightly modified the size of the
reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) which will replace the existing
bridge. The size of box culvert as currently proposed will be 10 foot wide
by 10 foot high instead of 9 by 10. As a result, the DOT is requesting a
modification of the NWP to include this design change. Please find enclosed
the appropriate permit application and drawings for your review. Additional
impacts other than those authorized by the existing NWP are not anticipated.
Your expedient processing of this request would be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please do not hesitate to
call Scott P. Gottfried at 919-733-3141.
Sincg7ri
' H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosures
ccs Mr. John Dorney, OEM
Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, NCWRC
Mr. Jimmy Lee, P. E., Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. Don Morton, P. E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, Jr., P. E., Structure Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. W. E. Hoke, P. E., Division 11 Engineer
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Planning and Environmental Branch
Mr. Davis Moore, Planning and Environmental Branch
9

NOTIFICATION FORM
INFORMATION SHEET
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
A. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISTRICT ENGINEER. (REFER TO
ITEM B. BELOW FOR DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICATION RE-
QUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICALLY NOTE NWP 26 DIFFERENCE.)
Certain nationwide permits require notification to the Corps of Engineers before work can proceed. They are as follows:
NWP 5 (only for discharges of 10 to 25 cubic yards)
NWP 7
NWP 13 (only for stabilization activities in excess of 500 feet in length or greater than an average of one cubic yard
per running foot)
NWP 14 (only for fills in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, and must include a delineation of affected special
aquatic sites)
NWP 17
NWP 18 (required when discharge exceeds 10 cubic yards or the discharge is in a special aquatic site and must include
a delineation of the affected special aquatic site, including wetlands)
NWP 21 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
NWP 26 (only for greater than 1 acre total impacts and must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites,
including wetlands)
NWP 33 (must include a restoration plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic resources)
NWP 37
NWP 38 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
For activities that may be authorized by the above listed nationwide permits that require notification, the.
applicant shall not begin work
a. Until notified that the work may proceed under the nationwide permit with any special conditions imposed by
the District Engineer, or
b. If notified that an individual permit may be required, or
c. Unless 30 days (calendar) have passed from the time a complete notification is received by the District Engineer
and no notice has been received from the District Engineer, and required state approvals have been obtained.
Required state approvals include: 1) a Section 401 water quality certification if authorization is requested for a
discharge of dredged or fill material, and 2) an approved coastal zone management consistency determination if
the activity will affect the coastal area.
'.Jse of NWP 12 also requires notification to the District Engineer, but work may not begin until written
-oncurrence is received from the District Engineer. The time periods described above do not apply.
=urthermore, requirements to notify the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine
.':.Iisheries Service (NMFS), and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), as indicated below and on the
notification form, do not apply.
1. APPLICATION TO DEM FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION.
*.-nain nationwide permits require an application to DEM in order to obtain Section 401 water quality certification.
bey are NWP 6, NWP 12, NWP 15, NWP 16, NWP 17, NWP 21, NWP 33, NWP 34, NWP 38, and NWP 40.
'ertain nationwide permits were issued general certifications and require no application. They are NWP 3, NWP 4,
'1WP 5, NWP 7, NWP 20, NWP 22, NWP 23 (requires notification to DEM), NWP 25, NWP 27, NWP 32, NWP 36,
nd NWP 37.
he following nationwide permits were issued general certifications for only limited activities: NWP 13 (for projects
:ss than 500 feet in length), NWP 14 (for projects that impact waters only), NWP 18 (for projects with less than 10
lbic yards of fill in waters only), and NWP 26 (for projects with less than or equal to one-third acre fill of waters or
:tlands). Projects that do not meet these criteria require application for Section 401 water quality certifications.

C. NOTIFICATION/APPLICATION PROCEDURES.
The attached form should be used to obtain approval from the Corps of Engineers and/or the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management as specified above. The permittee should make sure that all necessary information is
provided in order to avoid delays. One copy of the completed form is required by the Corps of Engineers and seven
copies are required by DEM. Plans and maps must be on 8 112 x 11 inch paper.
Endangered species requirement:. For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the presence of endangered species that may
be affected by the proposed project.
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
RALEIGH FIELD OFFICE
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone [phone]
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
HABITAT CONSERVATION DIVISION
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone [phone]
Historic resources requirement: For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the State Historic
Preservation Office regarding the presence of historic properties that may be affected by the proposed project.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
N.C. DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone [phone]
Information obtained from these agencies should be forwarded to the Corps.

NI
DEM ID:
ACTION ID: 199402011
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #):
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bo7.29535
A=: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. jOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT
1. Owners Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation; Planning & Environmental Branch
2. Owners Address. P. 0. Box 25201; Raleigh, NC 27611
3. Owners Phone Number (Home): --- (Work): [phone]
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number.
H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Watauga
Nearest Town or City:
Boone'
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NC 194 between SR 1335 and SR 1364,
approximately 1.2 miles north of Sands
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Meat Camp Creek
7. River Basin:
Upper New River
8. Is this project located in a watershed classified as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS II? YES [x ] NO [ ]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property? YES [x ] NO [ ]
If yes, explain.
Received NWP 23 authorization dated 6/16/94
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
N/A
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
Dr-ined:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: N/A

12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): Replacement of the
existing bridge at same location with a 4 @ 10' x 10' BRCS structure. A 3@ 96" CSP
will be used at detour just upstream of RCBC
13. Purpose of proposed work: To continue to provide public vehicular and pedestrian
access over Meat Camp Creek
14. State reasons why the applicant believes?Wt this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed or proposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES( ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES ( ] NO [ ]
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. N/A
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. N/ A
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. N/A
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. N/ A
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Land use is mostly pasture with some cultivation
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? N/A
0 er's Signature Date
v_-
n
- + r
- Q
ht ,t+
J
i
? y
w -f
w
?c
N
v W
- LLJ
F
E- ?
QJ
baG?o? PA?`MwJT
-- L11 M
/Ii c
o M 7-9 --
?,QDP06ED -?-?
_ 9@ /v'x?o'?PC3G
SILLS
------------ -4f P
o-
a
_v
a _
-PLAN :J ? E,N
r
r
i
r
0
N
. N ?
? J
J
pR o3?.Cl- ? ? ,» S i 301
? ~ u- 142
?A &f _'i of 3
6.:
• 1 '
I J?
AN
ON 1
C
Lti
r?
t v
t,
L
e ?u \ J
¢ ti p
C- 1 X31 r- pli ? W Q
Q i J
n. H
ICJ \
? _ Q aN•, ut O
?l ? 1 7
cs? 1? tS; C31 I 1LS 0
c?
I
O- I
_Q I
1 I
I
.o I
a . I
K

C

PA G E Z or 3;

J
C3 O
.-9
C?
D
a
a yQ n

c aUJ wU)

?.a o O p O 0._
IL l f ? Q- ?- o d
-°
?0. T

T- I
V

ai
44
w

I ¢ U

1 ,,an
? vl
N

w i 1

o I ?
? I
i
x --L___
I
i
'.

r
I
I
a
s
fl
b L
v
V
(Z Z ?

O
O
r
41
J
a

i
N
SAG(- 3 v? 3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA qq2
??
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT III
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
February 22, 1995
37 Battery Park Avenue
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2714
Mr. Steve Chapin
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Field Office
Regulatory Branch
Grove Arcade Building, Room 75
Dear Mr. Chapin:
.SUBJECT: Replacement of Bridge No. 74 over Meat Creek on NC 194 in Watauga
County, COE Action I. D. No. 199402011, State Project No. 8.1751301
and TIP Project No. B-1428.
On June 16, 1994 this project was authorized to proceed under Nationwide
Permit (NWP) No. 23. The Hydraulics Unit of the NCDOT has since finalized
the design plans for the project and has slightly modified the size of the
reinforced concrete box culvert (RCBC) which will replace the existing
bridge. The size of box culvert as currently proposed will be 10 foot wide
by 10 foot high instead of 9 by 10. As a result, the DOT is requesting a
modification of the NWP to include this design change. Please find enclosed
the appropriate permit application and drawings for your review. Additional
impacts other than those authorized by the existing NWP are not anticipated.
Your expedient processing of this- request would be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please do not hesitate to
call Scott P. Gottfried at 919-733-3141.
Sincer?l
H. Franklin Vick, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosures
cc-. Mr. John Dorney, DEM
Ms. Stephanie Goudreau, NCWRC
Mr. Jimmy Lee, P. E., Bridge Maintenance Unit
Mr. Don Morton, P. E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P. E., Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, Jr., P. E., Structure Design
Mr. Tom Shearin, P. E., Roadway Design
Mr. W. E. Hoke, P. E., Division 11 Engineer
Ms. Stacy Baldwin, Planning and Environmental Branch
Mr. Davis Moore, Planning and Environmental Branch
9
r
NOTIFICATION FORM
INFORMATION SHEET
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
A. NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISTRICT ENGINEER. (REFER TO
ITEM B. BELOW FOR DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT APPLICATION RE-
QUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICALLY NOTE NWP 26 DIFFERENCE.)
Certain nationwide permits require notification to the Corps of Engineers before work can proceed. They are as follows:
NWP 5 (only for discharges of 10 to 25 cubic yards)
NWP 7
NWP 13 (only for stabilization activities in excess of 500 feet in length or greater than an average of one cubic yard
per running foot)
NWP 14 (only for fills in special aquatic sites, including wetlands, and must include a delineation of affected special
aquatic sites)
NWP 17
NWP 18 (required when discharge exceeds 10 cubic yards or the discharge is in a special aquatic site and must include
a delineation of the affected special aquatic site, including wetlands).
NWP 21 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
NWP 26 (only for greater than 1 acre total impacts and must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites,
including wetlands)
NWP 33 (must include a restoration plan of reasonable measures to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic resources)
NWP 37
NWP 38 (must include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands)
For activities that may be authorized by the above listed nationwide permits that require notification, the
applicant shall not begin work
a. Until notified that the work may proceed under the nationwide permit with any special conditions imposed by
the District Engineer, or
b. If notified that an individual permit may be required, or
c. Unless 30 days (calendar) have passed from the time a complete notification is received by the District Engineer
and no notice has been received from the District Engineer, and required state approvals have been obtained.
Required state approvals include: 1) a Section 401 water quality certification if authorization is requested for a
discharge of dredged or fill material, and 2) an approved'coastal zone management consistency determination if
the activity will affect the coastal area.
`Ise of NWP 12 also requires notification to the District Engineer, but work may not begin until written
-oncurrence is received from the District Engineer. The time periods described above do not apply.
nurthermore, requirements to notify the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the National Marine
Asheries Service (NMFS), and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), as indicated below and on the
notification form, do not apply.
1. APPLICATION TO DEM FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION.
:ertain nationwide permits require an application to DEM in order to obtain Section 401 water quality certification.
bey are NWP 6, NWP 12, NWP 15, NWP 16, NWP 17, NWP 21, NWP 33, NWP 34, NWP 38, and NWP 40.
ertain nationwide permits were issued general certifications and require no application. They are NWP 3, NWP 4,
°TWP 5, NWP 7, NWP 20, NWP 22, NWP 23 (requires notification to DEM), NWP 25, NWP 27, NWP 32, NWP 36,
and NWP 37.
ye following nationwide permits were issued general certifications for only limited activities: NWP 13 (for projects
;ss than 500 feet in length), NWP 14 (for projects that impact waters only), NWP 18 (for projects with less than 10
Ibic yards of fill in waters only), and NWP 26 (for projects with less than or equal to one-third acre fill of waters or
°tlands). Projects that do not meet these criteria require application for Section 401 water quality certifications.

C. NOTIFICATION/APPLICATION PROCEDURES.
The attached form should be used to obtain approval from the Corps of Engineers and/or the N.C. Division of
Environmental Management as specified above. The permittee should make sure that all necessary information is
provided in order to avoid delays. One copy of the completed form is required by the Corps of Engineers and seven
copies are required by DEM. Plans and maps must be on 8 112 x 11 inch paper.
Endangered species requirement:. For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding the presence of endangered species that may "
be affected by the proposed project.
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
RALEIGH FIELD OFFICE
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Telephone [phone]
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
HABITAT CONSERVATION DIVISION
Pivers Island
Beaufort, NC 28516
Telephone [phone]
Historic resources requirement: For Corps of Engineers notifications only, applicants must notify the State Historic
Preservation Office regarding the presence of historic properties that may be affected by the proposed project.
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
N.C. DIVISION OF ARCHIVES AND HISTORY
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone [phone]
Information obtained from these agencies should be forwarded to the Corps.

DEM ID: ACTION ID: 199402011
Nationwide Permit Requested (Provide Nationwide Permit #):
JOINT FORM FOR
Nationwide permits that require notification to the Corps of Engineers
Nationwide permits that require application for Section 401 certification
WILMINGTON DISTRICT ENGINEER WATER QUALITY PLANNING
CORPS OF ENGINEERS. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
P.O. Box 1890 AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 P.O. Bo7.29535
ATTN: CESAW-CO-E Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Telephone [phone] ATTN: MR. JOHN DORNEY
Telephone [phone]
ONE (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
PLEASE PRINT.
1. Owners Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation; Planning & Environmental Branch
2. Owners Address: P. 0. Box 25201; Raleigh, NC 27611
3. Owners Phone Number (Home). --- (Work): [phone]
4. If Applicable: Agent's name or responsible corporate official, address, phone number. .
H. Franklin Vick, P.E.
Manager
5. Location of work (MUST ATTACH MAP). County: Watauga
Nearest Town or City: Boone'
Specific Location (Include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): NC 194 between SR 1335 and SR 1364,
approximately 1.2 miles north of Sands
6. Name of Closest Stream/River. Meat Camp Creek
7. River Basin: Upper New River
8. Is this project located in a watershed classed as Trout, SA, HQW, ORW, WS I, or WS H? YES [x ] NO [ ]
9. Have any Section 404 permits been previously requested for use on this property?
If yes, explain. Received NWP 23 authorization dated 6/16/94
10. Estimated total number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, located on project site:
N/A
11. Number of acres of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, impacted by the proposed project:
Filled:
Drained:
Flooded:
Excavated:
Total Impacted: N/A
YES [x ] NO [ ]
12. Description of proposed work (Attach PLANS-8 1/2" X 11" drawings only): Replacement of the
existing bridge at same location with a 4 @ 10' x 10' BRCB structure. A 3@ 96 CSP
will be used at detour just upstream of RCBC
13. Purpose of proposed work: To continue to provide public vehicular and pedestrian
access over Meat Camp Creek
14. State reasons why the applicant believes tilt this activity must be carried out in wetlands. Also, note measures
taken to minimize wetland impacts.
15. You are required to contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service
(NUYS) regarding the presence or any Federally listed orproposed for listing endangered or threatened species or critical
habitat in the permit area that may be affected by the proposed project. Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [ ]
RESPONSES FROM THE USFWS AND/OR NMFS SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
16. You are required to contact the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) regarding the presence of historic
properties in the permit area which may be affected by the proposed project? Have you done so? YES [ ] NO [ )
RESPONSE FROM THE SHPO SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO CORPS.
17. Additional information required by DEM:
A. Wetland delineation map showing all wetlands, streams, and lakes on the property. N/A
B. If available, representative photograph of wetlands to be impacted by project. N/ A
C. If delineation was performed by a consultant, include all data sheets relevant to the placement of the
delineation line. N/A
D. If a stormwater management plan is required for this project, attach copy. N/ A
E. What is land use of surrounding property? Land use is mostly pasture with some cultivation
F. If applicable, what is proposed method of sewage disposal? N/A 0 er's Signature Date
v,-
t+ .
I
C Q
l Q
(v V
• ?I
(v
t
y'1
rO ? N/
vi
m
C
N

V
?SR?DbE ,
9@ /UX ?o'r2C.?G

? ? 3e'•`3ia" csP
?

^^
^J 1
T

J
IL
T
M
I I
V
)^ILL SI.nPE To/F?j
?GSo? PA??r1FNT-

SILLS
S
-P L A O f ! E'nl
i
N
;n
M
'• W
Q
q
p2o3cc-r ?- ?,??5?3oi
L D 5- 1
?A&
'r_ '? o? 3?
ZZ,
L
n
7z 4t) i L}
IT
u \ -?
..1
N
? a
' 2 3
\Lj
-?' X 6 n ?'? ? Pn a
CD _ It
0
?1 p? V ; ?7J W ? ? CR ?
N N
t. O w
ILI
t? I? x C31 ? 1l! 0
I
\I `
I
I \
I

O \ j
d
ZuII
IL 4C?
L Ll v .
V
v
? ZN
i ?
I ?
o I I
i?
1
O ?
I
Z
per. ? ?
O

I
J

J
J

_ N
-PAUL 3 v? 3