19940837 Ver 1_Complete File_19940908

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DAT¢ T
11/_A`,`
REF
N OR R OM, BLDG.

RO REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.

ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION -
?NOTE AND RETURN TOME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
?f'PREPARE REPLY FOR 'MY SIGNATUR E ? SIGNATURE -
?TAKEAPPROPRIATE ACTION. ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:

ic
K't
s
a q
7

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS R. SAMUEL HUNT III
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.G 27611-5201 SECRETARY
September 23, 1994
District Engineer
U.S. Army Corps of El:gi-,eer-s
Wilming :cn. Nest l Carolina 23402
i w'TE117l`ZtON, . %ec "._ atc -'v "ranch
rear Sir.
,
3-ridge Su ect . -l ,:)rSy?--ll C-u- ty - R?p...ac:emenz -
No . 6
over ee!X S, P, 2._ Stat? nr' i1C
T.I.p. No. ...-2
_..,.......il:e n.'?,.c.._...Oil staff of ',-e U.S. ...may' cc-rp
of Engin_ers Pal 4g : Field cffice, .3CD0'7 will co '1IiT tc
3 n?i iJOttO,::id:ld ldl-dW-DG I see dlillgr Stl-sequent -O he
re;,n oval?of temporary w111 in w;-:t- lands at t:: _'s 1a- .' _
?te? la1-- ?^i-L11 'Ll-,Clude -a i.nimum. of S k S-ME C 1eS W i Z 1 no more
ail 20% oz any -Dne s?"'e-cies Le reselated. of '...le
folic6vi n_ species raay? "h t._iZea .
een Asli
-kmer_can Elm.
:71^'' il_--ra -lac'r: Wd'__.ut
e tom' mic'laux - Jdstid Ca..
•Platanus occident .lis - : ycaincre
12a' _ n1gra - laC"' W.l
Re`-_i' a Y'' 1.Gra - River 10): rch
-cT_s 7, .o-a - Water Cak
Al= plantings l1 be twel% a to e- _ :tea._ inch mare-rcc
seedlin gs . Plantinas will be placed at - rate ::f 320 stems
per acr` . Tl"- s , the 0.6 acre tempor ar'y . m odC site will
require :planting of ate leas- 192 seedlings placed on Si<{ to
zen fool- centers. 1-lo mo:litcring of nlydrology or vegetati(Dn
P.
is rac:..r..::erdad for this _ite.
ter t4.
k I\`,_ `` S

w
f
a

_.la.... you for you assistance. If you l:ave any
questions or need additional information, please call
?v1di
Ball at (919) 733--3141-
Sincerely,
B. o' • :zinn, P.E.
Assistant M er,
Planning -=nd Environmental Branch
BiC, ;_
A ttac_lmen
ici_n Dorney, BERM, DEM
D. E. w :tel."5 P.17 DiV1S? ..L' C-ne=1'
D+ rl ?ohiasGn, : aC"..Sied= E. V11"?ii.:ienL y

t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA '-
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
September 2, 1994
1iiS Li.. _c t Engineer. '
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P. Q. Bo 18910
'vYllmiilgtGn, North Carolina '0,±
ATTENTION: Regulatory Branch
Dear Sir:
y?"?
SFP - 81994
a?
_.i
t
TER QU/UiL01jy SECTIQN
R. SAMUEL HUNT III
SECRETARY
04t?
Gtc`
0
Sub;ect: Forsyth County - Replacement of Brief-e NO. 6:7
G.'er Bey'-=,w--= Cree-_ a,. S'R 2v_ ; Slate Project N
_ 2,622901, ?'.I.F. No. -2550
Attached for your information is « copy of the projec
planning report for the subject project. The profe:t i?
being processed by the Federal HighGra=y. m1i st?"at1vll as a
n, r, r- ategorical E<<clusionr t in «ccordanc 2 3 ., v? ?-,. 771 . 115 (b?
C
Therefore, we do not anticipate re _u ting an Individual
Permit but propose to proceed unr' Y d Nationw de Permit in
accordance with 33 CFR 330 Appe Y A (B-23) issueu November
22, 1991, by Che Corps of Engin e"s. The p- visions of:
Section 330.4 and Append-Lx A (C,) these -egul-at-Lons will' be
followed in the construction of'th,", r ct.
We anticipate that 401 General C
(Categorical Exclusion) will apply to
providing one copy of the CE document
Department of Environment, Health and
Division of Environmental ?Management,
ertification No. 2745
this project, and are
to the North Carolina
Natural Resources,
for their review.
If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Cyndi Bell at [phone].
Sincerely,
B. J. uP. E.
Assy?ta: ztanager,
Planning and Environmental Branc"-I.

BJO/clb
Attachment
cc: COE, Raleigh Field Office
John Dorney, DEHNR, DEM
John Parker, DEHNR, DCM/Permit Coordinator
Kelly Barger, P.E., Program Development-Branch
Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design
A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
John L. Smith, Jr., P.E., Structure Design
Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Desigi?
D . B . Waters, P . E . , Division 9 Engineer
Beverly J. Grate, Planning & Environmental
Davis Moore, Planning & Environmental

SR 2014, Forsyth County
Bridge No. 67 over Belews Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-2014(1)
State Project No. 8.2622901
T.I.P. Project No. B-2560
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
9-8.74
Date _f,-r,H. Franklin Vick, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
? Z
D e Nich L. G a .E.
F?WDivi 'on Administrator, FHWA
SR 2014, Forsyth County
Bridge No. 67 over Belews Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-2014(1)
State Project No. 8.2622901
T.I.P. Project No. B-2560
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
Documentation Prepared in Planning and Environmental Branch By:
01 Beverly J. Yi, 4?? CA???'Project Pl Engineer a .pFESS/pA,
= SEAL
i 17282 r
• s
?o FN01 NE.??r•?
Robert P. Hanson, P.E. '•.??F '. .....•••SO,?••
Project Planning Engineer, Unit Head P?HP;.•`? 9
SR 2014, Forsyth County
Bridge No. 67 over Belews Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-2014(1)
State-Project No. 8.2622901
T.I.P. Project No. B-2560
r
Bridge No. 67 has been included in the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement
Program. The location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial environmental
impacts are anticipated; therefore, this project has been classified as a
Federal "categorical exclusion".
I. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
It is anticipated this project will impact 0.4 ha (0.9 acre) of
wetlands. To minimize wetland impacts and other environmental effects,
sedimentation control guidelines and Best Management practices will be
implemented during construction. No special or unique environmental
commitments are proposed for this project.
A stream relocation is proposed for this project. Relocated streams
will be designed to have characteristics similar to the original stream
including re-establishment of streamside vegetation.
Fill material used for the temporary detour will be removed when the
detour is no longer needed.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will coordinate with
the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in accordance with the provisions of
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC 661-667c).
A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5(A)23, for impacts to surface waters
and wetlands of Belews Creek is likely to be applicable.
A North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) Section
401(1665) Water Quality General Certification is also required prior to
issuance of the nationwide permit.
II. SUMMARY OF PROJECT
The proposed project consists of the replacement of Bridge No. 67
over Belews Creek on SR 2014 in Forsyth County. The project area is shown
in Figure 1.
The project is included in the 1995-2001 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). Right of way acquisition is scheduled to begin Fiscal Year
1995, and construction is scheduled for Fiscal Year 1996.
The current cost estimate for the project is $580,250. The estimated
cost shown in the TIP is $75,000 for right of way and $425,000 for
construction.
2
III. EXISTING BRIDGE AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Bridge No. 67 was constructed in 1952. The structure consists of a
timber deck on steel I-beams supported by timber caps and piles with
timber bulkhead-type abutments. The structure has 3 spans at 6.4 meters
(21 feet) and 3 spans at 6.7 meters (22 feet) for a total length of 39.3
meters (129 feet). Bridge No. 67 has two lanes with a roadway width of
6.1 meters (20.1 feet) and a clear deck width of 6.1 meters (20.1 feet).
The approach roadway width is 5.2 meters (17 feet) with 0.61 meter (2
foot) shoulders. The present posting on the structure is 10886.2
kilograms (12 tons) for single axle vehicles and 16329.3 kilograms (18
tons) for trucks with trailers. The sufficiency rating is 11.8 compared to
100 for new structures with an estimated remaining life of 5 years. The
structure sits 3.4 meters (11 feet) above the stream bottom. Water depth
is normally about 0.3 meter (1-foot) deep. There is a small tributary
which approaches the bridge at the southeast corner of the bridge, running
directly under the existing bridge to the point of confluence to the west
end of the bridge. A power line and underground telephone cable run along
the north side of the bridge, and there is a 106 millimeter (4-inch) metal
pipe which crosses under the road and outfal 1 s at the east end of the
bridge on the south.side near the edge of the timber abutment.
Three accidents were reported in the vicinity of the bridge during
the period from February 1991 thru December 1992. All three were
ran-off-the-road type accidents.
There are approximately 36 school bus crossings per day on Bridge
No. 67. SR 2014 is used as a major thoroughfare to the schools located in
this area.
IV. ROUTE FUNCTION, LAND USE, AND TRAFFIC VOLUMES
SR 2014 is classified as a Non-Federal Aid Minor Collector in the
Statewide Functional Classification System.
The proposed project occurs in northeastern Forsyth county
approximately 4.83 kilometers (3 miles) east of Walkertown. The project
area is characterized as mostly rural, with agricultural fields and
forested tracts dominating the landscape. It appears the area is
undergoing development. A low-density residential development occurs near
the bridge site, to the west.
The current traffic volume of 2300 vehicles per day (vpd) is expected
to increase to 4400 vpd by the year 2016. The projected volume includes 1%
truck-tractor semi-trailer vehicles (TTST) and 3% dual-tired vehicles.
The posted speed limit is 70 km/h (45 mph).
V. ALTERNATIVES
Two methods of replacing Bridge No. 67 were studied. Each recommends
replacing the existing bridge at the present location with a four barrel
3.4 meters by 2.4 meters (11.0 ft. by 8.0 ft.) box culvert. The typical
• 3
section will be a 7.3 meter (24-foot) travelway with 2.4 meter (8-foot)
shoulders and guardrail. The design speed for each alternative is 80 km/h
(50 mph).
Alternate 1 will replace the existing structure in existing location
with road closure. Traffic will be maintained on other secondary roads.
Alternate 2 (Recommended) will replace the existing structure in the
existing location with a temporary detour structure to the south of the
existing bridge to maintain traffic. The detour structure consists of
four 1829 mm (72 inch) pipes with a grade approximately 0.6 meters (2
feet) below the existing road grade. The typical section for the detour
will be two 3.0 meter (10-foot) lanes and 1.8 meter (6-foot) shoulders
with guardrail.
Investigation of the existing structure by the Bridge Maintenance
Unit indicates that rehabilitation of the old bridge is not feasible due
to its age and deteriorated condition.
The "no-build" alternative would eventually necessitate closure of
the bridge. This is not prudent due to the traffic services provided by
SR 2014.
Relocation to the east or west of the existing alignment provides no
improvement to the roadway alignment. There is no improved alignment to
the east or west that provides a feasible alignment to the studied
alternates.
VI. COST ESTIMATES
Table 1 shows the estimated cost of both alternatives.
Table 1. COST ESTIMATE
RECOMMENDED
Alternate 1 Alternate 2
Structure $ 252,000 $ 253,030
Roadway Approaches
& Detour Structure N/A 176,070
Structure Removal 12,900 12,900
Engineering &
Contingencies 61,000 58,000
Right of Way Acquisition 69,500 80,250
Total Estimated Cost $ 395,400 $ 580,250
4
VII. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
Bridge No. 67 should be replaced in its existing location with a four
barrel 3.4 meters by 2.4 meters (11.0 ft. by 8.0 ft.) box culvert. The
typical section will be a 7.3 meter (24.0-foot) travelway with 2.4 meter
(8.0-foot) graded shoulders and guardrail. Traffic should be maintained
on an on-site detour structure located to the south of the existing
structure. The detour structure will consist of four 1829 mm (72 inch)
pipes with 3.0 meter (10-foot) lanes and 1.8 meter (6-foot) shoulders with
guardrail. The proposed project will be constructed within the existing
18.8 meters (60 feet) of right of way.
The Division Engineer concurs with replacing the structure in the
existing location, using a box culvert as the replacement structure, and
building an on-site detour structure to accommodate traffic during
construction. Division forces plan to widen SR 2014 to 7.3 meters (24
feet) in the future.
Channel widening will be required upstream and downstream of the
culvert to accommodate the proposed culvert. A minor channel change to
the small tributary.will also be needed.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will coordinate with
the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in accordance with the provisions of
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC 661-667c).
A road user cost analysis was performed (based on 2300 vehicles per
day and 8.96 additional miles of travel) indicating cost of additional
travel would be approximately $1,275,200 during construction. The
estimated cost on providing an on-site detour is $184,850. The difference
in cost is approximately $1,090,350 which proves the on-site detour a
justifiable means of detouring traffic. Also, a benefit cost ratio of 6.9
indicates the cost of constructing a detour structure is more economical
than detouring traffic. Coordination with Forsyth County emergency
services and school bus system officials indicated road closure would be
costly to the school bus system and serve as an inconvenience to emergency
services.
The project proposes to replace the existing bridge with a four
barrel culvert. The replacement of the bridge with a culvert is less
expensive and requires less maintenance than that of a bridge.
Replacement with a new bridge is estimated to cost $705,250.
Therefore the recommended alternate saves $125,000 compared with
construction of a new bridge.
Because minimal fill material is typically required for replacing a
bridge in existing location with a new bridge, no wetland impacts would be
anticipated.
VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTS
A. TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL
Forsyth County is in the central piedmont physiographic province.
The topography of the project area is characterized by a series of gently
rolling hills with small associated valleys or floodplains. The project
area is in the Felsic Crystalline Soil System. The poorly drained largely
hydric soils of the Wehadkee Series occur on the floodplain of Belews
Creek.
B. WATER RESOURCES
1. Waters Impacted
Belews Creek is in the Roanoke River drainage basin, and
originates approximately 5 kilometers (3 miles) south of the existing
bridge. Belews Creek flows into Belews Lake, a water-supply
approximately 11 kilometers (7 miles) north (downstream) of the
project crossing. Outfall of this lake is into the Dan River, in
Rockingham County.
2. Stream Characteristics
Streambed width of Belews Creek is approximately 6 meters (20
feet) at the point of crossing, but is much more confined upstream
and downstream. Depth is also highly variable along the stream
course, ranging from 0.6 m to 1.5 m (2 feet to 5 feet). This
variability is a result of debris formed pools as well as stream
action (bank scour). Substrate is composed of compact clay-loam,
along with coarse sand and gravel. Excess sedimentation is apparent
and is likely a result of the highly erodible soils and agricultural
practices upstream. Water clarity was poor during site visits and
flow rate was moderate.
3. Anticipated Impacts: Water Resources
Potential impacts to water resources include, decreases of
dissolved oxygen, and increases in water temperature. These impacts
are due to removal of the streamside canopy and removal/burial of
aquatic vegetation. Sedimentation and substrate disturbance
occurring during construction, can significantly reduce water
clarity.
Stream channel relocation is anticipated. If the stream
relocation is greater than 31 meters (100 feet) or greater than 15
meters (50 feet) on one side, consultation with the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission (WRC) will be required, per the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended. Relocated streams will be
designated to have similar characteristics as the original stream.
This also includes re-establishment of streamside vegetation.
6
4. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
outfall site is located at the southern corner of Bridge No. 67 over
Belews Creek. The NCDOT Right of Way Branch will coordinate with the
outfall owner regarding revision of the NPDES permit.
C. BIOTIC RESOURCES
1. Terrestrial Communities
Animals observed during the October 13, 1993 site visit are
denoted by (*) in the text.
a. Maintained Communities
Maintained Communities are land parcels in which the
vegetation is kept in a low-growing, non-successional state.
These communities include the existing roadside shoulder and
residential lawn and driveway. The roadside shoulder is
dominated. largely by fescue (Festuca sp.) and low-growing
herbaceous plants such as dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), red
clover (Trifolium pratense), wild onion (Allium canadense),
chickweed (Stellaria media), and nightshade (Solanum sp.).
Small shrubs and weedy vegetation occur at the edges of the
cleared roadside, grading into the forested bottomland. Common
species found here include winged sumac (Rhus copallina),
pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), Joe-pye-weed (Eupatorium
fistulosum), maypops (Passiflora incarnata), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), blackberry (Rubus spp.) and sericea (Lespedeza
cuneata).
Few animals reside along roadsides because of the limited
size and complexity of the habitat, however numerous
opportunistic animals use this area as a foraging zone, or as a
passage-way between forested habitats. Species found here are
able to adapt to the "edge" habitat created by human activity.
This edge is actually an ecotone between communities.
Various species of birds, which reside in the nearby
habitats, may feed along the roadside on seeds, berries and
insects. Some of these species observed include: the northern
cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)*, American robin (Turdus
migratorius), killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)*, indigo bunting
(Passerina cyanea)* and white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia
albicollis). Snakes such as the black racer (Columber
constrictor) and eastern garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis may
venture into this habitat to feed on insects and small mammals.
Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana)* and raccoon
(Procyon lotor)*, frequently forage nocturnally in these
habitats, or travel along roadways between habitats. These
animals are often roadkill victims. Consequently roadkills
attract a large number of scavenger species including turkey
vulture (Carthartes aura)* and common crow (Corvus americanus)*,
as well as domestic dogs and cats. Several groundhogs (Marmota
monax)* were observed foraging along the roadside in the project
vicinity.
b. Piedmont Alluvial Forest
This forested floodplain community is associated with
Belews Creek. Much of this community is classified as a
jurisdictional wetland. The majority of the small, narrow,
floodplain is undisturbed. Community composition is largely
dependent on the degree, and duration of flooding.
The dense, mature canopy of yellow poplar (Liriodendron
tuilpifera), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red maple (Acer rubrum), hickory
(Carya sp.), American elm (Ulmus americana) along with an
occasional black walnut (Juglans ni ra) and basket oak ( uercus
michauxii) occurs on the seasonal inundated floodplain, while
species such as the sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), black
willow (Salix ni ra), river birch (Betula nigra) and water oak
( uercus nigra) comprise the streambank canopy.
Box elder (Acer negundo), sugar maple (A. saccarum),
American holly (Ilex opaca) and ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
comprise the well developed midstory. Shrubs present include
buckeye (Aesculus sylvatica), spicebush (Lindera benzoin),
strawberry bush (Euonymus americanus) and fetter-bush (Leucothoe
recurva). Poison ivy and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus
quinquefolia) are the most abundant vine species, with moonseed
(Menisperum canadense), grape (Vitis spp.) and green brier
(Smilax spp.) present to a lesser extent.
The herbaceous component of this community is highly
variable within the community. Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis),
violet (Viola sp.), ragwort (Senicio aureus), wild rye (Elymus
virginicus), sedge (Carex spp.) and Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides) are abundant throughout the floodplain, while
species such as Jack-in-the-pulpit (Arisaema triphyllum), avens
(Geum canadense) and honewort (Cryptotaenia canadensis) are
present near the streambanks only. Some areas of the floodplain
appear to be saturated throughout the year. The herbaceous
species occurring here include soft needle rush (Juncus
effusus), netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata), green
arrow-arum (Peltandra virginica) and knotweed (Polygonum sp.).
These micro-habitats retain water because of their depressional
form, and in some cases seepage contributes to the saturated
conditions.
Alluvial Forests generally experience periodical flooding.
Faunal composition of these communities is usually reflective of
this flooding regime. Certain groups of animals such as
amphibians, which are water dependent, are abundant in this
8
forested community type. Ephemeral pools formed by the
floodplain depressions are utilized as breeding pools for
species such as spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculata),
northern cricket frog (Acris crepitans), spring peeper (Hyla
crucifer)* and many other species. Marbled salamander
(Ambystoma opaca)* and mud salamander (Pseudotrition montanus)*
were also found in this habitat. The marbled salamander lay
their eggs in damp soil rather than in pools, while the mud
salamander requires permanent water body for eggs and larval
development. Populations of many of these species are in
decline, due to habitat loss and degradation, as well as
hydrological and climatological changes.
Mammals such as raccoon, golden mouse (Ochrotomys nuttalli)
and southeastern shrew (Sorex longirostris) occur in a wide
variety of habitats, but are most abundant in forested areas
near water. This is also the case with many bird species.
Birds are the most prominent and conspicuous group of
vertebrates found in the forest. Wood boring defoliating insects
are abundant and are consumed by birds, such as the downy
woodpecker (Picoides puebescens)*, yellow-bellied sapsucker
(Sphyrapicus varius), pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus),
blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), yellow-throated
warbler (Dendrocia dominica), white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta
carolinensis), swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana), prothonotary
warbler (Protonotaria citrea), northern parula (Parula
americana)* and wood thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). The forest
contains many large mast-producing trees. Other fruits and
seeds are also plentiful and are also consumed by these species
as well as tufted titmouse (Parus bicolor)*, solitary vireo
(Vireo solitarius) and northern cardinal. The barred owl (Strix
varia) is a top predator of this community, feeding on rodents,
small birds, frogs and insects.
Aquatic Community
Aquatic vegetation is present in some stretches of this stream.
Species present include smartweed (Polygonum sp.) and pond lily
(Nuphar luteum).
Aquatic invertebrates are a major component of stream
ecosystems, as primary and secondary consumers, and as prey items for
organisms higher in the food chain. One freshwater mussel
(Unionidae) species (Elliptio complanata)*, is abundant in the
stream. Aquatic insects observed include whirligig beetle (G ry inus
limbatus)*, water boatman (Corixa spp.)* and common backswimmer
(Notonecta undulata)*. These along with larval forms of other
insects, including mayflies (Ephemeroptera), stoneflys (Plecoptera)
and dragonflys (Odonata) provide a significant food source for fish,
amphibians and reptiles of this community.
9
Two species of fish were captured during stream surveys,
bluegi11 (Lepomis macrochirus)* and brown bullhead (Ictalurus
nebulosus)*. Several other gamefish species are likely to occur
here. Belews Creek appears to be a popular fishing stream, as is
evidenced by the amount of fishing line and tackle caught in
overhanging limbs. Other species of sunfish (Lepomis spp.) and
catfish (Ictalurus spp.) as well as largemouth bass (Micropterus
salmoides), white crappie (Pomoxis annularis) and chain pickeral
(Esox niger) are common catches in small to mid-sized streams of the
piedmont. Non-game fish occurring in the stream may include rosefin
shiner (Notropis ardens), creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus),
fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare) and golden shiner (Notemigonus
crysoleucas).
Some amphibians, reptile and bird species are important
components of the stream ecosystem. Representative species from
these three groups which were observed during the site visit include
the pickeral frog (Rana palustris)*, bullfrog (R. catesbeiana)*,
painted turtle (Chrysemys icp tata)*, snapping turtle (Chelydra
serpentina)*, northern water snake (Nerodia si edon)*, belted
kingfisher (Megaceryle alcyon)* and green heron (Butorides
striatus)*, all of which are predators on a variety of aquatic
organisms.
3. Anticipated Impacts: Biotic Communities
a. Terrestrial Communitv Impacts
Project construction will result in clearing and
degradation of portions of the two terrestrial community types
described. The estimated loss of these communities is listed in
Table 2. Estimated impacts were derived using the entire
proposed right of way. Project construction often does not
require the entire right of way and therefore actual impacts may
be considerably less.
TABLE 2. ESTIMATED IMPACTS TO BIOTIC COMMUNITIES
Biotic Community
Alternate AF* MC
1 0.4 (0.9) 0.3 (0.8)
2 0.2 (0.6) 0.3 (0.8)
Impacts in hectares (acres) are based on 18 m (60 ft) of ROW; AF and MC
denote Piedmont Alluvial Forest and Maintained Communities, respectively;
* this community classified as jurisdictional wetland
10
The plant communities found along the project alignment
serve as shelter, nesting and foraging habitat for numerous
species of wildlife. Loss of habitat is likely to reduce the
number of faunal organisms, and concentrate them into a smaller
area, which causes some species to become more susceptible to
disease, predation and starvation.
Individual mortalities during construction, are likely to
occur to animals closely associated with the ground (snakes,
small mammals, etc.). Mobile species will be displaced during
construction, however the amount of forested habitat, will be
reduced.
b. Aquatic Community Impacts
Anticipated impacts to the stream community of Belews Creek
can be attributed to construction-related habitat disturbance
and sedimentation. Although disturbance and sedimentation may
be temporary processes during the construction phase of this
project, environmental impacts from these processes may be
long-lived or irreversible.
The aquatic environment serves as a major food source for
many terrestrial organisms such as raccoons, various species of
snakes, birds, turtles and amphibians. It also serves as a
means of predator avoidance for amphibians (frogs and
salamanders) and reptiles (snakes and turtles).
Benthic non-mobile organisms, such as filter deposit
feeders, and macro-and-micro alga, are particularly sensitive to
construction activities such as dredging, filling, pile driving
operations and slope stabilization. These construction
activities physically disturb the substrate, resulting in loss
of sessile benthic organisms. Many of these aquatic organisms
are slow to recover, or repopulate an area, because they require
a stabilized substrate for attachment. Substrate stability may
take a long time to develop, therefore, changes in community
composition will occur.
Populations of photosynthetic species, the primary
producers in the food chain, can be greatly effected by
siltation. The increased amount of suspended particles in the
water column reduces the photosynthetic ability, by absorbing
available light. Clogging of feeding apparati of suspension
feeders and burial of newly settled larvae of these organisms,
are other effects of siltation. These species are often primary
consumers in the food chain, and are a major step in the aquatic
food web. Impacts to these organisms may directly effect
organisms higher in the food chain, such as fish, amphibians,
reptiles, birds and mammals.
Mobile aquatic organisms may escape some of the effects of
siltation, however gills of fish, crustaceans and larval
amphibian and insect forms can become clogged and dysfunctional
as a result of sedimentation. Spawning habitats for these
11
mobile species may become filled with sediment, diminishing
reproductive success and inevitably reducing populations.
Habitat disturbance and sedimentation are extremely
detrimental to aquatic ecosystems. Best Management Practices
for the protection of surface waters, will be strictly
implemented to insure the biological integrity of the water
bodies impacted by this project.
Additionally if measures are not taken to reduce the amount
of probable increased concentrations of toxic compounds
(gasoline, oil, etc.) in the stream, coming from construction
related machinery and road paving activities, mortalities to
numerous types of aquatic organisms are likely.
Because the proposed project will replace an existing
bridge with a culvert, increased wildlife/vehicle conflicts may
occur. This is due to the reluctance of wildlife to cross
through culverts.
D. SPECIAL NATURAL SYSTEM TOPICS
1. Waters of the United States
The majority of the Piedmont Alluvial Forest qualifies as a
jurisdictional wetland community, largely associated with overflow of
Belews Creek. There are some areas where seepage is also a
hydrological source. These wetlands are classified as Palustrine
Forested, Broad-leaved Deciduous, Seasonally Flooded/Saturated
(PF01C/PF01B). Wetland impacts are estimated to be 0.2 ha (0.6 ac)
for Alternate 1 and 0.4 ha (0.9 ac) for Alternate 2.
Table 3. ESTIMATED WETLAND IMPACTS
Permanent Construction Detour Construction
Alt. 1. 0.2 ha (0.6 ac) 0 ha (0 ac)
Alt. 2. 0.2 ha (0.6 ac) 0.2 ha (0.6 ac)
Although there is to be minimal quantitative differences with
regard to wetland impacts, between the two alternates, qualitative
impacts are much less for alternate 1. Actual impacts resulting from
Alternate 1 may be less than reported, because the entire right of
way is not often impacted by construction projects on existing
location. Alternate 2 (temporary detour) will require temporary fill
within the wetland system. Placing of fill into a wetland community
may alter the hydrology of a much larger area of the wetland than
that within the impact, or fill area.
Fill material used for the temporary detour will be removed when
the detour is no longer needed.
12
2. Rare and Protected Species
a. Federally Protected Species
Picoides borealis (red-cockaded woodpecker)
Status: E
Listed: 10/13/70
The adult RCW's plumage is entirely black and white except
for small red streaks on the sides of the nape in the male. The
back is black and white with horizontal stripes and the breast
and underside are white with streaked flanks. There is a large
white cheek patch surrounded by the black cap, nape, and throat.
RCW's use open old growth stands of southern pines,
particularly longleaf pine for foraging and nesting habitat. A
forest stand must contain at least 50% pine. These birds nest
exclusively in trees that are > 60 years old and are contiguous
with pine stands at least 30 years of age. The foraging range
of the RCW is from up to 202 ha (500 acres), and this acreage
must be contiguous with suitable nesting sites.
These woodpeckers nest exclusively
usually in trees that are infected with
red-heart disease. Cavities are located
meters (12-100 ft) above the ground and
(30-50 ft) high. They can be identified
of running sap that surrounds the tree,
"candle-sticking".
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
in living pine trees and
the fungus that causes
in colonies from 3.6-30
average 9.1-15.2 meters
by a large incrustation
which is referred to as
No pine dominated stands will be impacted by the proposed
project. Construction will have no impact on the red-cockaded
woodpecker.
Cardamine micranthera (Small-anthered bittercress)
Status: E
Family: Brassicaceae
Listed: 9/21/89
The small-anthered bittercress is an extremely rare
perennial herb endemic to a few small streams and seepages of
the Dan River drainage basin, in Forsyth and Stokes Counties.
The one population known historically from Forsyth county was
destroyed in 1960 when the site was converted into a cow
pasture. It is necessary to continue to list this species in
Forsyth county, because in Stokes county, where species was also
considered to be extirpated, a population was found in 1985,
nearly 30 years after the species had last been seen. The
possibility exists that there may still be populations in
Forsyth county.
13
It is an erect, slender herb of the mustard family, with a
simple or branched stem 2 to 4 decimeter (0.7-1.3 feet) tall.
The basal leaves are crenate, 1 to 5 centimeter (2.5-12.7
inches) long and 0.5 to 2 centimeter (1.27-5.1 in.) wide. The
stem leaves are alternate and mostly unlobed, 1-1.5 centimeters
(2.5-3.8 in.) long, crenate and cuneate. Flowering and fruiting
occur in late April to early May.
Suitable habitat is described as fully to partially shaded
streambanks, seepages, wet rock crevices and sandbars, along
streams and small rivers. Surveys for this species should be
conducted during the flowering season, in early May.
Biological Conclusion: The historical record of this
species in Forsyth County is from Belews creek, approximately
4.8 kilometers (3 mi) downstream of the project crossing. The
streambanks within the project area offer suitable habitat for
this species. Plant by plant surveys along the streambanks were
conducted on May 10, 1994, by an NCDOT biologist. No plants
were observed. It can be concluded that construction of this
project will not impact this species.
b. Federal Candidate and State Protected Species
One Federal Candidate (C2) species is listed for Forsyth
County, the bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii). Candidate 2 (C2)
species are defined as taxa for which there is some evidence of
vulnerability but for which there are not enough data to warrant
a listing of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed Endangered, or
Proposed Threatened at this time.
The bog turtle is also listed as Threatened in North
Carolina and is given protection by the State Endangered Species
Act of 1979, administered and enforced by the North Carolina
Wildlife resource Commission.
This species is mentioned for information purposes, should
it become protected in the future. Typical habitat for this
species is not found within the project area.
A search of the NC-NHP data
resulted in no records of state
in the project area.
base of rare plants and animals
or federally protected species
E. HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
There are no known historic architectural resources in the area of
potential effect (APE) (see the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
letter in the Appendix dated March 22, 1993). Since there are no
properties either listed on or eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places within the APE no further compliance with Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act is required.
14
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project
area. Therefore, it is unlikely any archaeological resources eligible for
inclusion in the National Register will be affected by project
construction. The SHPO recommended that no archaeological investigation be
performed in connection with this project (see the SHPO letter in the
Appendix).
F. FARMLAND
The Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981 requires all federal
agencies or their representatives to consider the impact of land
acquisition and construction projects on prime and important farmland
soils. These soils are designated by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service
(SCS), and typically produce a high crop yield with a minimum expenditure
of resources.
Through coordination with the SCS, it has been concluded that the
proposed improvement will have no impact on prime and important farmland
soils. Therefore, no further consideration is required under the Act.
G. TRAFFIC NOISE AND AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS
The project is located within the jurisdiction for air quality of the
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department. Forsyth County has been
designated as a moderate nonattainment area for carbon monoxide (CO) and
Ozone (03). The attainment dates are December 31, 1995 for (CO) and
November 15, 1996 for 0 . The current State Implementation Plan (SIP)
does not contain any transportation control measures for Forsyth County.
Both, the Winston-Salem Urbanized Area Thoroughfare Plan and the
Transportation Improvement Program were determined to be in conformity to
the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) and the Interim Conformity
Guidance dated June 7, 1991 on September 8, 1993. There have been no
significant changes in the project's design concept and scope, as used in
the conformity analyses. This project is not anticipated to create any
adverse effect on the air quality for the region nor impede the scheduled
attainment dates.
The project consists of two alternatives to replace the existing
bridge over Belews Creek. Both alternatives propose to replace the
existing bridge in the existing location. Also, the project will not
increase traffic volumes, and no additional through lanes are planned.
Due to the aforementioned factors, the project's impact on noise and air
quality will be insignificant.
If vegetation is disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in
accordance with applicable local laws and regulations of the North
Carolina SIP for air quality in compliance with 15 NCAC 2D.0520. Noise
levels could increase during construction but will be temporary.
. No substantial traffic noise impacts are expected as a result of this
project. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for
. 15
highway traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAAA and
NEPA) and no additional reports are required.
H. HAZARDOUS WASTE EVALUATION
No sites have been identified as posing potential environmental
hazards within the existing or proposed right of way.
I. RELOCATION IMPACTS
The proposed project will not require the relocation- of any resi-
dences or businesses.
J. PERMITS
Impacts to Waters of the United States fall under the jurisdiction of
the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). A Nationwide Permit 33 CFR 330.5
(A)23, for impacts to surface waters and wetlands of Belews Creek is
likely to be applicable. This permit authorizes activities undertaken,
assisted, authorized, regulated, funded or financed in whole, or in part,
by another Federal agency or department. That agency or department has
determined that the activity is categorically excluded from environmental
documentation, because it will neither individually or cumulatively have a
significant environmental effect.
A North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) section
401 (1665) Water Quality General Certification is also required, prior to
issuance of the Nationwide permit.
BG/plr
FIGURES

¦
•
1981
100)
WALKERTOWN
POP. 6,8 02
200,
. h0
,o
n I?1,
q C
2Q9i -
2071
y?
i
12105

.90 ; ,,
•
20o9 •
•
-
¦
Z} ¦
¦
pg F?Q? ¦
¦
j t
158

¦
2011 : •
Q ¦ ¦
¦

F •
¦ •

t
•
j ¦
11 t ¦
¦ ¦
56 1150 ¦ ¦
I ¦ ¦
I t ¦
I • •
j14_9 ¦ •
741. .. y 1?? i?
U- 107]
BRIDGE NO. 67
I
I
O.
]060A _ H
1*21
30 S
..19 .j0 .0,
,_, 28 O
„2l
Y
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BRIDGE NO. 67 ON
SR 2014 OVER BELEWS CREEK
FORSYTH COUNTY
PROJECT B - 2560
FIG. 1
0 kilometers 3 0 miles 2
1 1 1 1 1 1
APPENDIX
r- s
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, secretary-
March 22, 1993
Nicholas L. Graf
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue
Raleigh, N.C. 27601-1442
Re: Replacement of Bridge No. 67 on SR 2014 over
Belews Creek, Forsyth County, B-2560,
8.2622901, BRZ-2014(1), ER 93-8230
Dear Mr. Graf:
Division of Archives and History
William S. Price, Jr., Director
/CE1
MAR 2 4 1993
Z? DID/ft;?r?? .
Ftip?r ,
On March 18, 1993, Robin Stancil of our staff met with North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of the minds
concerning the above project. We reported our available information on historic
architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our
recommendations. NCDOT provided project area photographs and aerial
photographs at the meeting and for our use afterwards.
Based upon our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the
meeting, we offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic architectural resources, we are aware of no historic structures
located within the area of potential effect. We recommend that no historic
architectural survey be conducted for this project.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based
on our present knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological
resources which may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places will be affected by the project construction. We, therefore, recommend
that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a
Categorical Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT
addressed our concerns.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966 and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
A-1 109 Fast Jones Street • Ralciph, North Carolina 27601-2807 ??
Nicholas L. Graf
March 22, 1993, Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley,
environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: ??. J. Ward
B. Church
T. Padgett
A-2
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission u
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: David L.- Yow, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Date: March 25, 1993
SUBJECT: N. C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Bridge
Replacement, Bridge No. 67 on SR 2014 over Belews
Creek, Forsyth County, North Carolina, TIP No. B-2560.
The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has
completed a review of the proposed bridge replacement and
possible impacts on existing wildlife and fishery resources in
the project area. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332 (2)(C)), and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48
Stat.. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed work involves replacement of an obsolete
bridge. Initial project analysis indicates that culverts and
fill may be used. No off-site detour route is anticipated, so a
temporary bridge or realignment will probably occur. While the
NCWRC prefers replacement on existing location with road closure
when such an alternative is available, we recognize that local
tranportation needs may preclude this option. However, the fill
and culverts initially considered for this project will impact
Belews Creek and adjacent wetlands. The completed crossing.would
also present a barrier to wildlife using the vegetated stream
corridor as a travel route, increasing the risk of wildlife-
related traffic accidents. If culverts and fill are used, or if
a temporary on-site detour is constructed, an Individual Corps
404 permit may be required due to the broad floodplain area to be
crossed. We would likely recommend denial of such a permit if
the proposed project involves avoidable wetland impacts.
A-3
Memo Page 2 March 25, 1993
The NCWRC recommends the following measures to avoid and
minimize wetland impacts on the proposed project:
(1) A spanning structure of equal or greater length should
replace the existing bridge. This will avoid stream
channelization and constriction of the floodplain, and
minimize fill in associated wetlands.
(2) If an on-site detour is proposed, we recommend
construction of the new bridge adjacent to the existing
bridge and use of the old structure to maintain
traffic. Wetland impacts would be reduced, since any
temporary crossing would probably involve culverts or
pipes and fill.
The subject project would probably be processed under a
Nationwide 404 permit if the preceding recommendations are
incorporated into project designs. Forsyth County is not
considered a "Trout Water County" with respect to the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers.Discretionary Authority on 404 Nationwide
Permits. Although the project will not require NCWRC review of
the Nationwide Permit application, we may provide comment on the
attending 401 Water Quality Certification administered by the N.
C. Division of Environmental Management.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input to the early
planning stages for this project. If I can further assist your
office, please contact me at [phone].
CC: David Sawyer, District 7 Wildlife Biologist
Joe Mickey, District 7 Fisheries Biologist
Stephanie Goudreau, Mtn. Region Habitat Biologist
Maria Lapomarda, Project Planning Engineer, NCDOT
A-4
r"'-
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
u DATE
1993
se 3
TO: -,
REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
Mx grit Galamh D EN - Dun. 6th Floor
FROM: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
Maria Lapomarda P & R
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
B-2560 - Forsyth County
Scoping Meeting Minutes
?.
V
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT, JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
June 3, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
FROM: Maria LapomardaCLt-?-
Project Planning Engineer
Planning and Environmental Branch
SUBJECT: Scoping Meeting
Bridge No. 67 on
Forsyth County,
TIP No. B-2560
Minutes for the replacement of
SR 2014 over Belews Creek,
State Project 8.2622901,
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
On March 18, 1993 a Scoping meeting for the subject project was held in
the Planning and Environmental Conference Room. The following people were in
attendance:
Robin Stancil State Historic Preservation Office
Lisa Heimburg Roadway Design
Ray Moore Structure Design
Jerry Snead Hydraulics
Sid Autry Location and Surveys
Don Sellers Right of Way
Jim Musselwhite Traffic Control
Danny Rogers Program Development
Bill Goodwin Planning and Environmental
Rob Hanson Planning and Environmental
Maria Lapomarda Planning and Environmental
During the meeting, two alternatives were identified. The first is to
replace Bridge No. 366 with a 4 @ 11' x 8' culvert in existing location with
an on-site detour. The detour culvert will be four 72" pipes placed on the
south side of the bridge. The estimated construction cost for Alternate 1 is
$500,000. The other alternative is to replace the bridge with a 4 @ 11' x 8'
culvert in existing location with road closure. The estimated construction
cost for Alternate 2 is $436,000. All alternatives will be studied in the
Categorical Exclusion.
Utilities are located on the northeast side of the bridge and will have
to be moved for construction. A NPDES outfall is located on the south side

June 3, 1993
Page 2
of the structure. This outfall may also need to be moved. Possible wetland
involvement on the southwest side of the bridge will likely determine which
side will be used for the detour structure. NCDOT biologists will determine
the limits of this wetland.
Attached for your review are the revised scoping sheets. Thank you for
your assistance in this part of our planning process. If you have any
questions about the meeting or scoping sheets, please call me at 733-3141.
ML/pl r
Attachment
BRIDGE
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Dates _
Revision Date-AOL, 193
Project Development Stage
Programming _
Planning
Design
TIP# B- x5(00
State Project#L;?Q?_ --._---.-
P.A. Pro jectt UT
Division 9
County Route_--5R t-)() I L_
Purpose of Project: lie?lce Obsolete?lir_ide
Description of Project: Re?-pL?'(?
Method of Replacement:
1. Existing Location - road closure
2Existing Location - on-site detour _??__
3. Relocation
4. Other.
Will there be special funding; participation by municipality,
developers, or other'! Yes- No_-. Z-
If yes, by whom and amount: ($
Page 1
BRIDGE
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Traffic: Current axe_) VPD Design Year4
&)D____VPD
TTST 1. ... % DT 10 % (1
Typical Roadway Section: FJCiST?n?C - a2 lanP`?_• (3 feef OP pal.''r? mnj
Ian , 3y feel 0 erne4
Existing Structure: Lengthla9.0feet Widthi-M__feet
Proposed Structure:
Detour Structure:
Bridge Widt.h._.______.feet
or
Culvert - Size __?L(a_1( (Meet by 6-D feet
Bridge - Length -feet Width feet
or
Pipe - Size _?o?, _i.nches
Construction Cost (including engineering; 50-0
and contingencies) .............................. $1 1(_*)^1,_/Q
Right of Way Cost (including rel.., util.,
and acquisition) ................................ $,(l
Force Account Items ................................. $
Total Cost ...................................... $_ +L.drd-
TIP Construction Cost ............................... $6 5D1, 000
TIP Right of Way Cost ............................... $
TIP Total Cost .............................. $
Page L
.. Z `? ................................
® 1

f.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
1111ANCH
BRIDGE NO. 67
FORSYTH COUNTY
B - 2560
1/93 FIG. 1
.
b?,c SUTpp
my?
ti
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
February 1, 1993
SAM HUNT
SECRETARY
O U.-Is
FE -- 9
MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Eric Galamb
DEM - DEHNR, 6th Floor
?^
FROM: L. J. Ward, P. E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Brand
SUBJECT: Review of Scoping Sheet for Replacement of Bridge No.
67 on SR 2014 over Belews Creek, Forsyth County, B-2560
Attached for your review and comments are the scoping sheets for the
subject project (See attached map for project location). The purpose of
these sheets and the related review rocedure is to have an early "meeting
of the minds" as to the scope of or ,that should be performed and thereby
enable us to better impleme proj ct. A scoping meeting for this
project is scheduled for M rch'18, 19 at 9:00 A. M. in the Planning and
Environmental Branch Confe ence R o (Room 470). You may provide us with
your comments at the meeting 11 them to us prior to that date.
Thank you for your assista ce in this part of our planning process.
If there are any questions abo t the meeting or the scoping sheets, please
call Maria Lapomarda, Project fanning Engineer, at 733-7842.
ML/plr
Attachment
bve&,?,La? tt #? 14-14 / Jam- ? YF?e)-

BRIDGE
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Date
Revision Date
Project Development Stage
Programming _
Planning
Design
TIP# B- a5(00
State Project# _
F.A. Project# _
Division 9
County
_?Q[i
Route- spcw 1Q11 L?__---- '
Purpose of Project: Replace Obsolete Bridge
Description of Project: Re-olace -b[?d.e to- nuer elp.ij r?
Method of Replacement:
1. Existing Location - road closure
2. Existing Location - on-site detour __.......
3. Relocation _
4. Other
Will there be special funding participation by municipality,
developers, or other? Yes No
If yes, by whom and amount: ($)_` (?)
Page 1

BRIDGE
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Traffic: Current 196b VPD Design Year VPD
TTST % DT %
Typical Roadway Sect}on:
Existing Structure: Length)aq,Qfeet Widthjq._Lfeet
Proposed Structure:
Bridge - Length._._._.__feet Width-
or
Culvert - Size C_ feet by
Detour Structure:
Bridge - Length-.- feet Width
or
Pipe - Size inches
Construction Cost (including engineering
and contingencies) .............................. $
Right of Way Cost (including rel.., uti.l..,
and acquisition) ................................ $
Force Account Items ................................. $
feet
feet
feet
Total Cost ...................................... $
TIP Construction Cost ...............................
TIP Right of Way Cost ............................... $ 51?),
TIP Total Cost....... ............................... $?c'ww
Page 2

DIt I DG I"
PROJECT SCOPING SHEET
Additional Comments:
Prepared By -I! I- r 0._ - ---- ----. D a t e -_Q.)il-q3--_-
Page 3
J`
1-
C?g

l4PJ. ?
- .4p •
09 •
2 ¦
¦
¦
J.4Y7. U
¦

ry

q

?S
Q)y\4 93

U8 \p4¦
• ¦
¦
•
¦

1 \

\

1°
/ Isn ¦
¦
i
?oil ?

•

\ 1114--. 21.4
.77
/

,
.12 Y:':.'
w :?;J9Y2
`'-:? .1477 Fi%:s .3o
1547

toy
¦
•
¦
•
,
??

20.1 .56 214LO
,?r?,.':,;, .....•4,?...Ji::::i::k::::::g:; ?'.
'Ci2•^
.••??
i''y7 r : y?yd
.
:?
.
.:. 1!!Y. ¦

1-014. ??
IC::: ,V,
R;S. .:::r?"I \4
+C -6Q
WALKERTOWN
p
7
?
o
;,
.
141
_^a t44a ...:::;a POP. 4802
o
• ,,...
ZU n:%•: 114> ..b
2011
. BRIDGE NO. 6 7

6 ..52
'ss 44lq
\y

.. 73P1

ia
R ?d b _ o
1119 .1 . l 0
i Jp

u
417q
217.
.54
?
'??
:!`?
. 2414
23.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
BRIDGE NO. 67
FORSYTH COUNTY
B - 2560
1/93 FIG. 1
•
¦
¦
• Y
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE NC 65-NC 87 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
EAST OF WENTWORTH
Project 8.1511102 U-2560 Rockingham County
The North Carolina Department of Transportation will hold the
above Public Hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in
the Rockingham Community College, Whitcomb Student Activity Center,
County Home Road, Wentworth, NC.
The hearing will consist of an explanation of the proposed
location and design, right of way requirements and procedures, and
relocation advisory assistance. The hearing will be open to those
present for statements, questions, comments and/or submittal of
material pertaining to the proposed project. Additional material
may be submitted for a period of 10 days from the date of the
hearing to: L. L. Hendricks, P. O. Box 25201, Raleigh, NC 27611.
The proposed project consists of widening NC 65 to a three
lane roadway from SR 2371 (County Home Road) to just east of
SR 2374 (Peach Tree Road). NC 87 will also be widened to a three
lane roadway from SR 2082 (High School Road) to NC 65. The
intersection of NC 65 and NC 87 will be signalized. Additional
right of way and the relocation of homes and businesses will be
required for this project.
A map setting forth the location and design and a copy of the
Categorical Exclusion are available for public review at DOT's
Rockingham County Maintenance Complex located 1.5 miles east of
Wentworth near the NC 87/NC 65 Intersection.
Anyone desiring additional information regarding the Public
Hearing may contact Mr. Hendricks at the above address or telephone
[phone].
NCDOT will provide reasonable accommodations, auxiliary aids,
and services for any qualified disabled person interested in
attending the Public Hearing. To request this assistance, you may
call Mr. Hendricks no later than seven days prior to the date of
the hearing.