NCG020813_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20120217 (2)

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/v L)
DOC TYPE
S� HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ ooIc,) 0 a` �
YYYYMMDD

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources �
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman r
Governor Director Secretary
February 17, 2012
Mr. W.F. Parker
W.F. Parker
565 Neptune Drive
Swansboro, NC 28584
Subject: Gcncral Permit No. NCG020000
Circle P Farm — Styron Pit
COC NCG020813
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Parker:
In accordance with your complete application for a discharge permit received on
February 7, 2012, we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge
under the subject state — NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007
(or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to
the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may require modification
or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage.
Please be aware that mine dewatering at your site has the potential to impact wetlands
adjacent to your mining pit areas. You have indicated to DWQ at our meeting on February 7,
2012, that you do not believe that your mine dewatering and mining expansion will affect
wetlands at this site. Note that removal of use of jurisdictional wetlands is prohibited; removal
of hydrology of jurisdictional wetlands is a violation of wetland standards. The water quality
standards for wetlands found in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2113 .0231 require
that "Hydrological conditions necessary to support the biological and physical characteristics
naturally present in wetlands shall be protected to prevent adverse impacts on: C. The chemical,
nutrient and dissolved oxygen regime of the wetland; D. The movement of aquatic fauna; and F.
Water levels or elevations".
The specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in the text
of the attached permit. For new or expanding mine sites, or modifications to existing permitted
mine sites, permittees need an approved Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan before mine
dewatering discharges occur; discharging mine dewatering wastewater from those sites without
Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action. If your mining activities expand or
modifications are proposed, you must work with the Wilmington Regional Office to submit and
approve an Operation and Monitoring plan prior to these changes to your mine site. Please note
that even if a permittee is not required to obtain an approved O&M Plan, this does not relieve
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportuky 1 Affirmative Action Employer
None
ithCarolina
Naturally

Mr. W.F. Parker
Circle P Farm — Styron Pit: NCG020813
February 17, 2012
him/her of adhering to the wetland standards discussed above. DWQ would encourage all
permittees that dewater to submit an operation and Monitoring Plan, and will review them on
request.
T his site will discharge mine dewatering wastewater to a receiving stream (Gales
Creek) designated as Sheilfishing Waters (SA), High Quality Waters (HQW), and a
Primary Nursery Area (PNA), Circle P- Styron Pit will discharge from the same location and
will be permitted under a transferred permit from the previous owner. This permit was originally
permitted in 1996 and currently allows a discharge to these waters. DWQ understands from our
meeting with you on February 7, 2012, that the discharge from Circle P- Styron Pit will be
approximately half the volumetric flow rate as the previous owner's at the same location. DWQ
supports that reduction in discharge. Please note that any nem discharges to SA, HQW, PNA
waters will be subject to a wastewater discharge volume. Any and all discharges to SA, HWQ,
PNA waters are subject to more stringent TSS limits.
Please note that mine dewatering wastewater includes wet pit overflows caused solely
by direct rainfall and groundwater seepage for this type of mining operation. Any discharge of
this water (and any stormwater commingled with it) is subject to the effluent limitations in this
permit.
This general permit allows the discharge of stormwater and certain types of wastewater
from your facility. In your application, you specified that only mine dewatering water would be
discharged from this facility. If separate point -source discharges of stormwater occur (i.e.,
stormwater nol combined with mine dewatering water), you will be required to adhere to the
conditions in this permit for stormwater discharges.
Additionally, new coastal stormwater management rules (SESSION LAW 2008-211)
were implemented October 1, 2008. From DWQ's conversation with you in our meeting on
February 7, 2011, DWQ understands that you do not intend to increase impervious surfaces at
your mine sites. Please note that if you do increase or add additional impervious surfaces which
create stormwater runoff, you may be required to apply for an additional Coastal State
Stormwater Permit. Please contact Kelly Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-
796-7345 to determine if you will be required to submit an application for this additional permit.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that
may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bradley Bennett at
telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
ORIGiNAL SIGNED BY
BRADLEY BENNE"l'T
for Charles Wakild, F.E.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Jim Gregson
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCGO20813
STORMWATER AND WASTEWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
W Parker
is hereby authorized to operate approved wastewater treatment system(s) and discharge
stormwater and/or wastewater, as approved in the original permit/application or
subsequent permit modification, from a facility located at:
Circle P Farm Styron Pit
200 Chris St
Newport
Carteret County
to receiving waters designated as Gales Creels, a class SA;HQW water in the White Oak
River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and
other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 11, III, and IV of General Permit No. NCG020000 as
attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective October 1, 2015.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day October 1, 2015.
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM
Director, Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

STATE OF NORTH CAROhINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020813
STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of'North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
W.F. Parker
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering wastewater from a facility
located at:
Circle P Farm — Styron Pit
200 Chris Street
Newport
Carteret County
to receiving waters designated as a UT to Gale's Creek, a class SA, HQW, PNA water in the
White Oak River Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements,
and other conditions set forth in Parts I, I1, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG020000
as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective February 17, 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day February 17, 2012,
OR#GiNAL SIGNET BY
BRA.DLEY BENNE77
for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

,.o
Jones, Jennifer
u
From: Bennett, Bradley
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 2:26 PM
To: Jones, Jennifer; Gregson, Jim; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter rev3.doc
Attachments: NCG020813 Cover Letter rev3 bb.doc
ten,
have attached a version with changes to the paragraph on O&M. I think the original read as if he had to submit the
plan, so I tried to make some adjustments. Let me know what you think.
have to leave at 3.30 today if you are still trying to get this out.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Web: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:48 AM
To: Gregson, Jim; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter_revIcloc
Jim,
I'll issue the permit today.
Thank you for your comments.
Jennifer
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su

Jones, Jennifer
From:
Jones, Jennifer
Sent:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:48 AM
To:
Gregson, Jim; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda
Cc:
Jones, Jennifer
Subject:
RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter_rev1doc
Jim,
I'll issue the permit today.
Thank you for your comments.
Jennifer
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
S12 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: jennifer.jones@ncdenr.�ov
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by,statute or other regulations.**
From: Gregson, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 1:37 PM
To: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter_revIcloc
I think the language is good. I think we can continue to try to encourage Mr. Parker to submit and implement an O&M
plan and/or look at alternate discharge location options that would alleviate the HQW concerns. Once he is in receipt of
the letter and back from vacation I think it would be a good idea to schedule a site visit with him.
Jim Gregson
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protecton Section
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
**E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.**
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:25 AM

To: Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda; Gregson, Jim
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: NCG020813_Cover Letter rev3.doc
HiAll—
Have worked on the language — see attached letter and 'below:
1-he specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in the text of the
attached permit. For new or expanding mine sites, or modifications to current mine sites, permittees will need
an approved Operation and Monitoring (O&M) flan before mine dewatering discharges occur; discharging
mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action. In the above cases,
an Operation and Monitoring Plan must be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office within 60 days of your
receipt of this permit. Contact the Surface Water protection Section Supervisor at the appropriate Regional
Office for more information about the approval process. Please note that if the permittee is not required to
obtain an approved O&M Plan, this does not relieve him/her of adhering to the wetland standards discussed -
above. DWQ would encourage all permittees that dewater to submit an Operation and Monitoring Plan, and will
review them on request.
Please let me know if you think this fits our needs for this permittee.
Thanks,
Jen
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ ! Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: htt ortal.ncdenr.or web w Q/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations."
I agree with Bradley on the 0&M language. I would suggest language that encourages an 0&M plan be prepared for
the current facility and mandates one be prepared for expansion.
Jim Gregson
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protecton Section
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Tel. [phone]
Fax [phone]
I

**E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.**
From: Bennett, Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:14 PM
To: Jones, Jennifer; Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda; Karoly, Cyndi
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Hey Guys,
I just read through the letter. It's a good approach at addressing a difficult project with some tough issues. I do think
that we will have a tough time with the last paragraph on the first page that requires the 0&M plan development before
he can discharge. He will argue that Styron was discharging for years before and didn't have an O&M and he proposes
to discharge less than Styron. Since this one is existing and was previously permitted I think we should take that into
consideration. I talked with Al a little about how WaRO was handling O&M plans for existing mines. He indicated that
they were not actively pursuing O&M in these cases unless the mine was going to DLR for a mine expansion (or
potentially if a violation was to occur that was attributable to the discharge). I agree that this is the way we should be
addressing existing mines and I think we talked about this some in our call a few days ago. I'd like to know what you
guys think and how we might be able to address this in the letter. I think about it some and see if I can come up with
some language. It's possible that paragraph #2 that spells out all the wetland issues may be the basis of what we need.
After that we could point to the potential need for an O&M if there is an expansion, etc.
Let me know your thoughts on this.
:e
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: brad ley. ben [e-mail]
Web: http:l/portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/s u
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:10 PM
To: Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda
Cc: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Hi Jim and Linda,
I just wanted to check with you to see if you had any more edits or comments on this letter or permit. If you could get
back to me today or tomorrow regarding NCG020813, then I can go ahead and issue the permit. I believe we said that
we would issue the permit this week to Mr. Parker.
Cyndi gave me some edits on this letter so I have modified it (see attached), but the meaning is not significantly
changed.

I
Thank you!
Jennifer )ones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ ) Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: htto:lZr)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:49 PM
To: Karoly, Cyndi; Bennett, Bradley; Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Hello,
I have attached the latest draft of the cover letter for NCG020813. If you could please review it and reply back to me
with your revisions by February 14, 2012, 1 can then send it out with an issued permit.
Please let me know if you have any other matters that may affect permit issuance.
Thank you!,
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR ( DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: htto://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
4

Jones, Jennifer
From: Willis, Linda
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 11:08 AM
To: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Gregson, Jim
Subject: RE: NCG020813—Cover Letter_rev3.doc
All,
Just so you know, I've been addressing the mines with discharges to SA and PNA HQW waters when the mine permittee
either renews or modifies their permit with DLR. I think it's important that we have consistency on how we address
them, but I think upon renewal is an appropriate time as well as if they modify their permit. It was an oversight in this
office that the existing mines discharging to SA or HQW classified streams were permitted without ensuring compliance
with our 213 rules. We have been able to address O & Ms where wetlands are concerned at any time since the last
permit renewal in 2010 which indicated that 0 & Ms may be needed. Styron's permit was not actively renewed, but
that pit is still under the last permit revision requirements imposed in Jan 2010.
Furthermore, I would like for management to work through the 0 & M with Mr. Parker because I doubt we will require
him to meet the 7Q10 flow limit and I think a discharge from a pit that doesn't meet our rules should be approved by
management.
Thanks for asking our opinion, as you know, I don't mind giving you mine.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:25 AM
To: Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi; Willis, Linda; Gregson, Jim
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: NCG020813_Cover Letter_rev3.doc
Hi All —
Have worked on the language — see attached letter and below:
The specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in the text of the
attached permit. For new or expanding mine sites, or modifications to current mine sites, permittees will need
an approved Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan before mine dewatering discharges occur; discharging
mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action, In the above cases,
an Operation and Monitoring Plan must be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office within 60 days of your
receipt of this permit. Contact the Surface Water Protection Section Supervisor at the appropriate Regional
Office for more information about the approval process. Please note that if the permittee is not required to
obtain an approved O&M Plan, this does not relieve him/her of adhering to the wetland standards discussed
above. DWQ would encourage all permittees that dewater to submit an Operation and Monitoring Plan, and will
review them on request.
Please let me know if you think this fits our needs for this permittee.
Thanks,
Jen

Jones, Jennifer
From:
Sennett, Bradley
Sent:
Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:14 PM
To:
Jones, Jennifer; Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda: Karoly, Cyndi
Subject:
RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Hey Guys,
I just read through the letter. It's a good approach at addressing a difficult project with some tough issues. I do think
that we will have a tough time with the last paragraph on the first page that requires the 0&M plan development before
he can discharge. He will argue that Styron was discharging for years before and didn't have an O&M and he proposes
to discharge less than Styron. Since this one is existing and was previously permitted I think we should take that into
consideration. I talked with Al a little about how WaRO was handling O&M plans for existing mines. He indicated that
they were not actively pursuing 0&M in these cases unless the mine was going to DLR for a mine expansion (or
potentially if a violation was to occur that was attributable to the discharge). I agree that this is the way we should be
addressing existing mines and I think we talked about this some in our call a few days ago. I'd like to know what you
guys think and how we might be able to address this in the letter. I think about it some and see if I can come up with
some language. it's possible that paragraph #2 that spells out all the wetland issues may be the basis of what we need.
After that we could point to the potential need for an O&M if there is an expansion, etc.
Let me know your thoughts on this.
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: brad ley. ben nett(& ncden r.gov
Web: .http:llgortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
Email correspondence to and from this address may
disclosed to third parties.
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:10 PM
To: Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda
Cc: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi
Subject: RE: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Hi Jim and Linda,
i all
AA
/ n
I just wanted to check with you to see if you had any more el
back to me today or tomorrow regarding NCG020813, then I
we would issue the permit this week to Mr. Parker.
FIA
and may be
,�)swl V y-r,%.,.-permit. If you could get
-issue the permit. I believe we said that
Cyndi gave me some edits on this letter so I have modified it (see attached), but the meaning is not significantly
changed.
t

Thank you!
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR 1 DWQ ( Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mai! Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: iennifer.iones@ncdenr.�ov
Website: http:/�portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations."
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:49 PM
To: Karoly, Cyndi; Bennett, Bradley; Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda
Cc: ]ones, Jennifer
Subject: NCG020813_Cover Letter.doc
Mello,
have attached the latest draft of the cover letter for NCG020813. If you could {Tease review it and reply back to me
with your revisions by February 14, 2012, I can then send it out with an issued permit.
Please let me know if you have any other matters that may affect permit issuance.
Thank you!
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.orglweblwct/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**

Jones, Jennifer
From:
Jones, Jennifer
Sent:
Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:20 PM
To:
Bennett, Bradley; Karoly, Cyndi
Cc:
Gregson, Jim; Willis, Linda; Jones, Jennifer
Subject:
NCG020813
Hi Bradley,
Thank you for speaking with me this morning about our meeting yesterday. If you can send me an email detailing what I
am to do about this permit and its permitting process I will know how to proceed,
Thank you!
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR i DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**

Jones, Jennifer
From: [e-mail]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:43 PM
To: Jones, Jennifer
Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Wehner, Judy; Willis, Linda; Bennett, Bradley
Subject: Re: NCC-020813 additional information request
Jennifer,
Thank you for your request for clarification.
I have NO INTENT to dewater the Circle P Farm(16-72) to the Styron Pit(16-21) and then
discharge to surface waters. I DO NOT understand where that is coming from.
Yes, I talked to DLR(Ms. Ashley Rogers & Ms. Judy Wehner) in Oct. 2011 when I was
transferring the Styron pit(16-21) over if they wanted me to combine and they said to keep it
separate because Circle P FARM PIT(16-72) was not complete and approved. They advised it
might be feasible down the road.
Circle P Farm Permit(16-72) has nothing to do with the issue at hand —that permit is
designed, approved, bonded, received and is acceptable to me and all approving agencies. I
am wanting to continue the Styron Permit(16-21) which has been approved and bonded and
transferred to me in Oct. 2011, told by Linda Lewis I would be grandfathered on two
occassions that I would be allowed to discharge just as Mr. Styron has done for FIFTEEN YEARS
PLUS.
Now, after the Oct. 2011 transfer without any other notification by any State Branch, I am
being ask to sample discharge, apply for a new dicharge with you and now you advise that I
may have to apply for another new State Stormwater Permit that was begun in 2008. Why was Mr.
Styron not requested to do water sampling for DWQ, apply for a discharge permit with you
division and get the 2008 stormwater permit? When will this end and how many more "after the
fact" permits must I get?
My frustrations are continuing to build with this confusion on the end of the State?
Respectfully,
WF Parker
---- "Jones wrote:
> Dear Mr. Parker,
> I have spoken to Bradley and he said that you'd like our additional information request
before you leave on vacation, so I am including it below. I have copied Ashley Rodgers and
Judy Wehner in the Division of Land Quality (DLR) so if there are overlapping requests we can
all be notified and in agreement.
> Please provide the following information:
> 1. After speaking with staff in the Division of Land Resources, it is my
understanding that they believe your intention is to pump from the Circle P Pit (16-72) to
the Styron Pit (16-21), and then discharge to surface waters from the Styron Pit. After
I

hearing back from Bradley, I am unclear if this is your intention. Please confirm your
pumping and dewatering plan and the water routing in writing.
> 2. DLR staff also indicated that you intend to combine the areas permitted under 16-
72 and 16-21 into one DLR permit (so that you can discharge from (the current) 16-72 area to
16-21 pit) but have not applied to as of yet. Please confirm your plans to do this, and a
time frame for when you expect this to happen. Please be aware that the issuance of an NPDES
permit is contingent upon the issuance of an associated mining permit from DLR. This
contingency is a condition of our NPDES general permit for mining. Our DWQ office will
finalize the processing of your stormwater permit application once a DLR mining permit has
been issued for your project.
> 3. Under our understanding of your facility plans and water routing now, it appears
that your will pump from 16-72 to 16-21, and that you plan to combine the permits 16-72 and
16-21 into one DLR permitted area. If this is correct, DWQ requests that you permit both of
these areas Circle P (16-72) pit and Styron Pit (16-21) under one permit. Please confirm
this, and if the previous statements are true, please modify your application to include
areas permitted under DLR permit 16-72.
> 4. In order to have a better understanding of your site we would also like to have a
complete site plan for both the Circle P mine (16-72) area, and the Styron Pit mine (16-21)
area on one site map. Please provide us with one.
> 5. Please provide us with a copy of your Division of Land Resources Mining
applications for both 16-72 and 16-21.
> Also be aware that if your project is located near wetlands, your NPDES permit will require
dewatering operations without wetland impacts. The specific requirements for mine dewatering
at facilities near wetlands can be found in the text of the general NPDES mining permit
number NCG 020000 available on our website. An approved Operation and Monitoring Plan is
required for NPDES-permitted mining facilities and may be required prior to permit issuance.
Discharging mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement
action. A Plan for your facility must be submitted to the Washington Regional Office within
60 days of your receipt of an NPDES permit. We encourage you to contact Linda Willis at the
Wilmington Regional Office to address any wetland concerns for your facility in order to
ensure a successful NPDES application review.
> Additionally, new coastal stormwater management rules (SESSION LAW 2008-211) were
implemented October 1, 2008. Due to these rules you may be required to apply for a "State
Stormwater" Permit. Please contact Kelly Johnson in the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-
796-7345 to determine if you will be required to submit an application for this additional
permit.
> Please provide the above information by March 20, 2012 or your application may be returned
as incomplete. If you cannot provide the above information in that time frame, please send a
notification to us in writing to request additional time.
> Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have further questions, I will be glad to help.

> Thank you,
> Jennifer Jones
> Environmental Engineer
> NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
> 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
> 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> Email: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
> ** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or
other regulations.**
3

Jones, Jennifer
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:41 AM
To: [e-mail] -
Cc: Bennett; Bradley; Willis, Linda; Wehner, Judv; Rodgers, Ashley; Jones, Jennifer
Subject: NCG020813 additional information request
Dear Mr. Parker,
I have spoken to Bradley and he said that you'd like our additional information request before you leave on vacation, so I
am including it below. I have copied Ashley Rodgers and Judy Wehner in the Division of Land Quality (DLR) so if there
are overlapping requests we can all be notified and in agreement.
Please provide the following information:
After speaking with staff in the Division of Land Resources, it is my understanding that they believe your
intention is to pump from the Circle P Pit (16-72) to the Styron Pit (16-21), and then discharge to surface waters
from the Styron Pit. After hearing back from Bradley, I am unclear if this is your intention. Please confirm your
pumping and dewatering plan and the water routing in writing,
DLR staff also indicated that you intend to combine the areas permitted under 16-72 and 16-21 into one DLR
permit (so that you can discharge from (the current) 16-72 area to 16-21 pit) but have not applied to as of yet.
Please confirm your plans to do this, and a time frame for when you expect this to happen. Please be aware that
the issuance of an NPDES permit is contingent upon the issuance of an associated mining permit from DLR. This
contingency is a condition of our NPDES general permit for mining. Our DWQ office will finalize the processing
of your stormwater permit application once a DLR mining permit has been issued for your project.
3. Under our understanding of your facility plans and water routing now, it appears that your will pump from 16-72
to 16-21, and that you plan to combine the permits 16-72 and 16-21 into one DLR permitted area. If this is
correct, DWQ requests that you permit both of these areas Circle P (16-72) pit and Styron Pit (16-21) under one
permit. Please confirm this, and if the previous statements are true, please modify your application to include
areas permitted under DLR permit 16-72.
4. In order to have a better understanding of your site we would also like to have a complete site plan for both the
Circle P mine (16-72) area, and the Styron Pit mine (16-21) area on one site map. Please provide us with one_
5. Please provide us with a copy of your Division of Land Resources Mining applications for both 16-72 and 16-21.
Also be aware that if your project is located near wetlands, your NPDES permit will require dewatering operations
without wetland impacts. The specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in the
text of the general NPDES mining permit number NCG 020000 available on our website. An approved Operation and
Monitoring Plan is required for NPDES-permitted mining facilities and may be required prior to permit issuance.
Discharging mine dewatering was ewatV rw VIA
hout Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action. A Plan for your
facility must be submitted to the egional Office within 60 days of your receipt of an NPDES permit. We
encourage you to contact Linda Willis at the Wilmington Regional Office to address any wetland concerns for your
facility in order to ensure a successful NPDES application review.
Additionally, new coastal stormwater management rules (SESSION LAW 2008-211) were implemented October 1, 2008.
Due to these rules you may be required to apply for a "State stormwater" Permit. Please contact Kelly Johnson in the

Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7345 to determine if you will be required to submit an application for this
additional permit.
Please provide the above information by March 20, 2012 or your application may be returned as incomplete. If you
cannot provide the above information in that time frame, please send a notification to us in writing to request additional
time.
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have further questions, I will be glad to help.
Thank you,
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**

Jones, Jennifer
From: Bennett, Bradley
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:34 AM
To: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: FW: Styron Pit
FYI
BB
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:[e-mail]
Web: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
-----Original Message -----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 9:29 PM
To: Willis, Linda
CC: Bennett, Bradley
Subject: RE: Styron Pit
Thank you for the short and long of it..let me explain the rest of the story if you will
Linda,
When I met with you and 3oann about a new permit for Circle P Farm in early 2011, I did
discuss options of digging a borrow pit and the end result being a duck impoundment with some
shelves of less than two feet. Never did, I imply the entire borrow pit would only be two
feet in depth ... why would anyone go through what I have for the last year(time and money) to
do that? We all concluded that discharging into the creek was not an option and I redirected
my efforts in the design of the new borrow pit discharging into an existing partially
completed pond on the Styron farm next to me. I have always stated that the new pit would be
approximately 15 feet in depth and that is what my application showed in May 2011. The new
borrow pit is not adjacent to any creek or wetlands what so ever, just like we discussed in
the field with Joann. This permit 0&M requires that I maintain a 7.25ft. freeboard in the
Styron receiving pond in order not to overflow and allow for rain events. Your first
paragraph talks about maintaining the Stryon pit no lower than 7 ft., not draining the
wetlands and monitoring by use of a overflow weir was not discussed and does not apply
because this is a closed loop system with no discharge..this pond will be receiving water not
discharging. My permit was approved(Permit No.16-72) along with the 0&M plan and there is no
issue with this permit at all. I do not plan to start this borrow or sever ors and
I do not understand why you even broom g 'it up. Last y I was told t` o register my water
withdraw with DWR an'd th-e"withidraw rate_a_pproved was �47,916 gpd which is the same as y
permit with R. ���

After submitting my new pit application in May, 2011, I proceeded in purchasing the Styron
farm(90 acres) and closed on it in August, 2011. Part of the new permit process was showing
proof that I owned the Styron pond where I was potentially discharging my wastewater and that
it was in fact a closed loop system.
Now to the issue at hand. Before I purchased the Styron farm and before I had DLR transfer
the original Styron borrow pit permit(16-21), I conferred with you several times to make sure
that 1 would be able to continue pumping just as Styron had for 15+ years and you said yes I
would. Based upon that, I had DLR transfer the permit effective Oct. 3,2011. I emailed you
on Dec. 14, 2011, as a courtesy and ask if there was anything else I needed to do because I
was ready to begin dewatering the Styron pit in order to complete it. That is when you,told
me to monitor the effluent and I would hear from Jennifer Jones about a discharge permit. I
did hire a lab to do the monitoring even though Mr. Styron was never required to do so. Then
Ms. Jones sends me 30+ pages of instructions and a 9 page application for a NCG020000 for a
National Pollutant Discharge Permit. I applied for that permit on Jan. 24, 2012 and
expressed my suprise & concern to Ms. Jones, yourself and she shared them with Mr. Bennett.
As stated previously to all, if I was informed during the permit transfer or afterwards, I
would have been able to work on versus finding out after the fact and after the transfer.
In your Dec. 15, 2011 email response to me about other after the fact requirements needed for
the original Styron permit. You stated that the Styron pit could only discharge 50% of the
77Q10 flow and you estimate based upon your site visit last Summer the creek had a flow of
40,000gpd leaving the Stryon pit to discharge 20,000gpd. I did contact Mr. Weaver of USGS amd
ask for his opinion based on USGS info for this site and he responded there was no data
available. To comply with this requirement of 20,000gpd or 13.88gpm it will take 613 days to
dewater the 2.5 acre borrow pit 15ft deep not allowing for rain or groundwater infiltration.
I sent you a picture of 1/6 hp basement pump that produces 12.00 gpm through a 3/4 garden
hose. I know the 0&M is to protect the wetland and shellfish 2 miles away, but this is not
reasonable. I agreed Monday to voluntarily do monthly water sampling for the first month
even though it is only required quartley and then adjust from there in order to protect the
environment from discharge, but I need the ability to pump at a higher rate in order to
develope the existing Styron pit.
Mr. Styron has been pumping for many years using a 12" vertical turbine pump discharging at a
very high rate, no water quality monitoring and no discharge permit. I do not plan to use
that type pump and I will be willing to be reasonable on the discharge rate and do required
monitoring, but 20,000gpd will not work.
I am forward our correspondence to Mr. Bennett because you said you would out until Monday
and he is going to call me in the morning. I felt like he.needs to know both sides.
Respectfully,
W.F. Parker
---- "Willis wrote:
> Here's the short and long of it Mr. Parker,
> The resources the 0 & M are to ensure protections for are:
> 1. Wetlands and
> 2. SA Shellfishing waters
2

> I brought Jo with me on our site visit to ensure that there were no wetlands in close
proximity to your new proposed mine "Circle P" that we would be concerned about protecting
due to your dewatering. If you will recall, you indicated you were mining to create a
wetland for a waterfowl impoundment and would not need to dig very deep. So let me ask you
at this point, how deep did you indicate you would excavate on your permit from DLR? We
weren't expecting anything deeper than a couple feet. Is this still the case? If it is
greater than 20 feet deep, we may have a concern for wetlands or the creek that is located
adjacent to this pit. You also indicated to protect wetlands around the Styron Pit (because
there are wetlands within close proximity) that you would maintain a certain water level in
the Styron Pit at all times to protect the nearby wetlands from draining (which would work)
and that you could control the level using the elevation of the overflow weir from that pit.
All that must be spelled out in writing in your 0 & M. I would think maintaining the level
of water in the Styron pit no lower than 7 feet from the surface would protect wetlands in
the nearby vicinity, but I'll have Jo confirm. If you decide to dig deeper say over 20 feet
in the Circle P pit, we may need you to put in monitoring wells in wetlands near that pit.
> Now, concerning SA shellfishing waters.
> You specified a discharge of 20000 gallons per day. Please indicate in detail how you will
ensure this to be so and define how you will monitor that daily and document it. The
submersible pump is better sized and appears to be the way to go, your calculations look
good. You need to specify how you will insure the quality of the discharge will meet the
permit limits for SA waters. Since you will pump to the Styron Pit, indicate where on the
map you will introduce that discharge (and logically it needs to be introduced -the farthest
point from the outlet from the pit so you have adequate settling time). Revise your 0 & M for
monthly monitoring and state that if the fecal counts are below 14 FCC/100 mL, then you will
reduce monitoring to quarterly. If any subsequent quarterly test is greater than 14, you
will immediately contact DWQ with the results and discuss any modification to the monitoring
plan in accordance with DWQ's instruction and implement more frequent monitoring at DWQs
request. If this occurs, I'll visit with Shellfish Sanitation and determine whether the
levels you are discharging are a threat for closing the shellfish waters. I'll find out at
that point too whether you will need more frequent monitoring. Monthly may not be often
enough based on the fecal levels. By law, we cannot permit a discharge that removes a use
for surface waters and certainly not the taking of shellfish. This is why I was really
encouraging you to go non discharge. I'll need some help from Shellfish to determine what
levels may be a problem. I'm hoping maintaining a low discharge flow will help provide some
protection if the levels of bacteria are high. . . although by law dilution is not supposed
to be used to control pollutant levels. Tidal effects too in the creek can make a
difference. Your discharge can have a greater effect during low tide than high. Shellfish
Sanitation has some monitoring stations in that creek and we'll have to cross that bridge
when we get to it. . . so I can't make any promises on what we may require when we get to
that point. Let's hope we don't have a problem. You'll need to follow up on the Fecal data
once you've submitted samples so the lab doesn't drag their feet for weeks before they report
to you. You need to specify that you will be willing to modify the 0 & M if the results of
the fecal testing prove problematic for the shellfish resource. We'll have to figure out how
to deal with that situation together.
> Update the January 30, 2012 0 & M for these items and I'll run it all by Shellfish folks
and Central Office. Mr. Bennett will be contacting you tomorrow, he was in a meeting most of
the day today. I'm going to be in the field for the next two days and out of touch until
Monday. Jen is sending me the map you sent her. . I haven't seen it yet and would like to
make sure it has all the info on it we need so I'll visit with you on that once I've seen it.
> Have a good evening and I'll contact you on Monday via email or phone.
> Thanks.
> LW
3

> ** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or
other regulations.**
> -----Original Message -----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:58 PM
> To: Willis, Linda
> Subject: Styron Pit
> Linda,
>
> I received your email last night and trying to determine an approach on the 0 & M.
> Please review attachment and call me at 252-241-0376 when your available:
> Respectfully,
> W.F. Parker
f 14
V

Jones, Jennifer
From:
Willis, Linda
Sent:
Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:43 PM
To:
Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley
Cc:
Rodgers, Ashley; Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject:
RE: styron pit
Jen,
No you did a fine job, I just clarified a few points to help.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:41 PM l
To: Willis, Linda; Bennett, Bradley -x7 h� �,unn-GC �- +4—�� � '
Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Georgoulias, Bethany"" J C7�- �
Subject: RE: styron pit -A�
Hmmm... seems a bit lacking no?
Geez!
Jen _
k4AIA, Jennifer Jones � d� ff ,I- ��"/"V"�"
Environmental Engineer
am` �- � 0 �t Z4 V
NCDENR I DWQ I Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617�
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 �tj VI
n� ✓� h, o -f � aGw�G l��r"� L`:�
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Vi ��u G✓Z`r�vt
Email: ienniferJones(@ncdenr.eov
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Willis, Linda
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:29 PM
To: Jones, Jennifer; Bennett, Bradley
Cc: Rodgers, Ashley; Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject: RE: styron pit
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
1

From: Jones, Jennifer
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:35 PM
To: Bennett, Bradley
Cc: Willis, Linda; Jones, Jennifer; Rodgers, Ashley; Georgoulias, Bethany
Subject: Styron pit
Importance: High
Hi Bradley,
OK! Linda and I just spent about an hour trying to figure out what was wrong with this CIRCLE P/STYRON PIT site. So...
here are the facts as i understand them. (Linda, please correct me if I'm wrong here):
1. Mr. Parker owns "Circle P" pit (DLR permit # 16-72) and "Circle P-Styron Pit" (DLR permit # 16-21). He has
recently purchased them. He has transferred ownership from the previous owner to him in his DLR permits.
* * the original Styron Pit was called Styron Pit and not Circle P- Styron Pit.. so the change in the name may have caused
confusion that this pit wasn't already in existence.**
2. He is not discharging from 16-72 directly to surface waters, but is discharging from 16-72 to 16-21.
**correct**
3. Linda visited 16-72 in October, 2011. At that time, he told Linda he would not discharge from EITHER pit to
surface waters, but would discharge from 16-72 to 16-21, and NOT discharge from 16-21, ever, and that 16-21
would not need to discharge and would absorb all the water. Linda was skeptical but said ok. Linda did not visit
16-21 at that time.
**correct** He may have been able to discharge pit to pit without a discharge since his intent to mine at the new site
(16-72 Circle P) was to create a wetland for a duck impoundment for hunting and that he wouldn't be digging very deep
at all .. maybe a few feet, thus perhaps he could handle the need to dewater with the Styron Pit, but he would have to
demonstrate that to us via the 0 & M.**
4. There was no DWQ permit for 16-72, so Linda was not able to write up an inspection report for it.
**correct, he hadn't gotten that far because he was working on getting a permit from DLR at that point.. which is when
I advised him to let DLR know that the new permit he was applying for would be discharging wastewater to the Styron
Pit**
5. Because he said he would not discharge to surface waters from 16-72, Linda filled out the DLR review form for
16-72 and said he did not need a permit. Linda never received a review form from DLR for 16-21 (because it was
only an ownership name change? Ashley can you please confirm?).
**can't remember if a Styron review form came to me.. may have, but my response would be that there is already a
permit in place for NCGO20317 and therefore no application for NPDES permit would be required** I don't have record
of the Styron review form in my saved folder for mine reviews. But.. I could've missed saving this one. .. likewise I
can't find it in my saved emails from Judy or Ashley. I have a folder for all mine review requests**
6. He called Linda in December, 2011 and said that "Oh yes, turns out I am going to have to discharge from 16-21
after all". Linda told him that he would need a permit to discharge, but as 16-21 already had a DWQ permit
number — and told him the permit number (NCG020317) — he can renew NCG020317, and discharge using that.
She told him he did not also need to get an additional new permit, but just to use and renew the old one.
**correct.. see attached O & M verifying that he originally would not discharge due to my concerns for open shellfish
waters in Gales Creek**
7. He then called me in January (he may have spoken to me before, but I don't think he did) and said that he
needed to get a permit, Linda hadn't told him until now (or a couple of weeks ago) that he needed a permit to
discharge, and what did he need to do. He was angry, and said this was holding up his business, and how
frustrated he was etc. etc. etc.
**Mr. Parker was advised to take care of the ownership issue- I told him where the form was on our website* *

8. 1 told him that he needed to apply for a permit (because he didn't tell me that he already had a permit) and
what he needed to do. I apologized if DWQ was making him late etc etc. At that time, Mr. Parker, also said he
would send an O&M to Linda for 16-21 as well.
**he'll need one for both pits since he will be discharging from Styron and there are wetlands in close proximity."
9. Since then, Mr. Parker made an application to us here in DWQ for a NEW DWQ permit for 16-21 (which we now
have received in house — as of late last week). He has not mentioned in his permit (question 10) that he has had
a previous permit or an active permit.
10. Mr. Parker needs to work on his 0&M plan as there are most likely wetland issues as Linda and Joanne
Stienhouse have not had a chance to visit 16-21 yet, and the site plan I have is rife with wetland areas.
**correct**
SO — I see two routes for Mr. Parker:
1) He can keep the application in for a new permit. We will need to send it to Shell fishing for their review as is
standard for new discharges to SA waters. We will not collect the old fees from Mr. Parker in this scenario.
2) Mr. Parker can renew the old permit NCG020317. He will need to pay old back permit fees, but, since it is an old
permit and previously permitted, we will not send the review to Shellfishing for their review. However, he will
be required to pay the back -fees in this scenario.
*****Questions I have for BRADLEY AND DLR STAFF:
1) Is it ok to not have a DWQ permit for 16-72? He is pumping out of the pit — but just not directly to surface
waters.
**AND DWQ had determined that there are no wetlands within close proximity that we would have concerns for them
impacting**
2) Should this permit NCG020317 cover all of 16-72 and 16-21 as water is being pumped from 16-72 to 16-21 and
then out? Water from 16-72 will be making it from surface waters, but via 16-21. That seems perhaps the most
comprehensive to me, but I am not sure if its ok. Bradley — please comment.
**So you know.. I had visited with DLR in the RO and they said if he is dewatering from pit to pit, the receiving pit must
be shown on their mine map and therefore would likely require a mod to the Styron Pit (existing pit) as well he should
be identifying the same on the new pit.. I told him to check in with DLR about this situation.. did he talk to you all about
how these two pits are related?**
3) Can we use the DWQ additional information sheet that Al Hodge et al. made be a requirement of all DLR
renewals and DLR name changes as well, so that our DWQ Regional Office Staff and permittees are notified of
these issues up front and we have a written record? One issue, I believe, with this is that WiRO DWQ staff were
not notified of the DLR renewal as there was no review sheet with the name change. Please correct me if 1 am
wrong.
*****Bradley/Linda: I think we all need to have a CONFERENCE CALL with Mr. Parker so we can ensure we
are all on the same page. I am available until 4:45 PM today so let me know when you'd like to do that.
**sounds good to me, I need to speak with Mr. Parker anyway**
ASHLEY/LINDA: Please correct me if any of my facts above are wrong and email back to me. Ashley: I've left you a
couple of messages about this, if you could please call me if you have any more information on this I'd appreciate it!
ALL - I look forward to hearing back from you on this! Linda — I apologize again if I didn't take up for you when Mr.
Parker called — he was attacking me as well, and I was trying to be sympathetic, and I buckled. I should have known
better. I really apologize for that.

**No apologies please. This is a very complicated situation as mine sites go. My thoughts were that he would address
his intent with DLR and they would provide advice to him on how to proceed on their end. Because, if they want all this
taken care of under one permit, then we are dealing with one permit. Also, they would be the determining factor on
which permit would accommodate this activity if only one permit would suffice (a modified Styron permit or a new
Circle P permit that included the Styron Pit). how we would proceed on our end in a large way depended upon how DLR
would handle this one. So.. until knowing that... it was all somewhat up in the air. I surmised if two permits would be
pursued, then we would not need to have an NPDES permit for the Circle P permit (since they aren't discharging directly
to surface waters), and we already have an NPDES permit for the Styron Pit (which had allowed discharges to surface
waters).
What we needed was a one stop meeting with DLR, Mr. Parker, Joanne S (wetland specialist), CO permitting staff and
myself in one meeting. From now on, that is exactly what I will require for anymore of these types of situations. That
would have been the best way to handle this one and everyone would know what was going on. I hope DLR
understands what is happening here.
Ok - that's my report for that. Thanks everyone!
Jennifer Jones
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR ! DWQ j Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email [e-mail]
Website: httpJlportat.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**

ALIWWIF
0 AA Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
IVAL
NC®ENR National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
rioRr.+ C+aOu++ DeP.wr.e�r or
En.nwonn�nr ono NuI.N... Reso�Nce5
NCG020000
NOTICE OF INTENT
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Dale Received
Year Month
Dny
Ccnificalc ar Cowragc
Chcck N Amoum
Permit Assigucd to
rm1 5
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000:
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The following activities are also included:
• Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate
products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations;
• Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations; UR(9120VON
Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or
• Mine dewatering (wastewater)
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit: ,IA N 2 5 2011
• Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining; VVE DENR- WATER QUALITY
• Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater l�o°W !9§0tiWtERBRANC1
operations and/or concrete operations;
• Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and
• Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
• NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150
The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000-
• Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (i.e., sand
dredging or dipping operations)
For new mining sites that require an authorization to construct (ATC) wastewater treatment facilities: This
NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATC for new wastewater treatment facilities. ATC requests must be
submitted at least 90 days prior to construction'.
For exi tinQ mining sites that require an Authorization to Operate (A TO) wastewater treatment facilities:
This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATO for wastewater treatment facilities in place.
Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components at an existing site requires an
ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG020000, the ATC request may be submitted without an NOI).
Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or recycle wastewater at mining sites will require an ATC rp IOr
to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138. Please see the NCG020000 General Permit for details about which
treatment facilities require an ATC (summarized in Table 1 below). The authorization to construct or continue
to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of Coverage (COG) for the NCG02 permit. Design of
treatment facilities must comply with requirements of 15A NCAC 2H .0138 & .0139.
Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATC/ATO requirements in the NCG02 permit
at new orexisting mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed
Page 1 of 9
'As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106
2Unless treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to perform
such work for their respective companies in accordance with General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed and sealed
by a P.E.
SWU-NC602-NOI Last revised 06/07/2010

NCG020000 N.O.I.
and sealed by a Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staff2 along with this application. A copy of the
design calculations should be included. Please see questions 18 & 19.
Table 1: Summary of Wastewater Permit Requirements
Quarterly
Monitoring?
Requires
A to C?
Mine Dewatering IMD)
Yes
No
Yes
No
MD Discharges that do not need treatment
other than E&SC to meet permit conditions
✓
MD Discharges that need treatment other than
is&SC to meet permit conditions
✓
✓
Process Wastewater
Other Recycle
✓
✓
Closed Loop Recycle
✓
✓
Any Other Process WW
✓
✓
f For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 7)
(Please print or type)
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed):
Owner Name ` � ` v Y .
�l `t Owner Contact • F PA & � V
Street Address S i iU
City 5AJNAbo(o State G ZIP Code
7�3594-
Telephone No. 25Z nS f -U� Fax:
fi-
E-mail Address Ff�ACL't� (-0 EC, Q R • wvV1
2) Location of facility producing discharge: D
Facility Name a e
Facility Contact
Street Address
City
County
Telephone No.
Contact E-mail
0 t?"IS C
3) Physical Location Information:
Gv G-C, Zf . COAA
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to he facility (u�ge,street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). Lt-� ►A ; M CE T0121k 0A1n% j
oAt� 5 4akt ?.4 oA 1 1111ii{_ �4� + xAle-- A_ �'_ �� �`� Qi-� CCt(t(
4) Latitude 2)40A I 4r7 51W LongitudCV A r'51• t2S3r� (degrees, minutes, seconds) ey-eek-
Page 2 of 9
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Permits:
5) This NPDES Permit Application applies to which of the following:
ew or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin
existing
❑ New Permit not applicable — ATC request only. NPDES Permit Number
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code:
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: Sw V
8) Is this mine an inactive mine site?
Ll No
❑ Yes If yes, do you posses an "Inactive Renewal" from DLR and notified the DWO Regional Office or
have you certified to the DWO that the site has been stabilized? ❑ No ❑ Yes
9) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)?
❑l No
4 Yes
If No, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application:
1f yes, please provide the Mining Permit number: 1 6 -2 1
copy of your DLR Mining Permit with this DWO application.
Please also provide a
Note: DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCGO20000 General Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or
renewed by the Division of Land Resources (DLR).
10) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
i No
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
11) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
VNo
❑ Yes If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
12) Does total area of this mine site include ready -mix and asphalt areas?
M/No
❑ Yes If yes, do they have DWO stormwater permits (if owned by the same company)? ❑ No ❑ Yes
(provide permit number )
If not owned by the same company, who is the owner?
13) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
b/No
❑ Yes
14) Is this mine located within one of the 20 Coastal Counties and will it add more than 10,000 ft2 of impervious
surface?
7011TIO
Page 3 of 9
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010

El

NCG020000 N.O.I.
IV Yes If yes, you may be required to apply for an additional state stormwater permit. Check with your
local Regional Office. See contact information and checklist below.
15) Is this mine located the Neuse, Tar -Pamlico, or Catawba River Basin, or the Randleman or Jordan
Water supply Watersheds?
5/N o
❑ Yes If yes, what size stream buffers are included on site? ft. Please show buffers in site plans.
Discharge Points, Receiving Waters & Wetlands:
16) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in? GAIN CCU K_
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer)..
Receiving water classification (if known): 54
Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-11 to WS-V or SA must be
approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage under
NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of wastewater are permitted in receiving
waters classified as WS-1 or freshwater ORW. Wastewater discharges to Saltwater ORW will
not be approved under the NCG02 General Permit.
17) If your facility has wastewater discharges and they are to HWQ, PNA waters (Primary Nursery Areas) waters,
what is the flow rate? to,
000 (See htti)://www.ncdmf.net/maips/FNA maps/index.html, for map)
18) Discharge Points:
Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property):
Onsite: Stormwater. Mine dewatering: Process Wastewater Overflow:
Ottsite: Stormwater: Mine dewatering: Process Wastewater Overflow:
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan.
Please provide short narrative description of discharges:
U U_ i:LO W I-T-0 0kTL9T C
a) Is your mine dewatering and discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering)
Ov0-
❑ No
15 Yes If yes, where to? Surface Waters and/or Wetlands (on -site or off -site)
Other (on -site or off -site) Describe:
b) Are you dewatering but not discharging? (Answer only if you are dewatering)
l(No
❑ Yes If Yes, please explain how you are dewatering, and where that water will be directed:
N
Page 4 of 9
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010

:� _
-, .. �.
� ' • �
,, ,,��C
;�
�_

NCG020000 N.O.I.
19) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
M/No
❑ Yes
Note: Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement a Pumping Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the
Division.
For sites that may drain wetlands — approval of a Pumping 0&M plan maybe required prior to
coverage under this general permit. The Pumping O&M Plan should be submitted to the
appropriate Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance. See
checklist at end of document. Contact your local Regional Office for questions specific to your mine.
20) I;�No
u are dewatering, are there wetlands or surface waters within 400' of the mine pit perimeter?
❑ Yes If yes, what distance are they from the mine pit perimeter?
21) Have you been required to obtain a 404/401 Certification permits?
M No
feet.
❑ Yes If yes, please briefly describe below (include information such a required mitigation, BMPs, setbacks,
and/or O&M plans for on or off -site wetlands or other pertinent information). Attach other sheets as necessary:
22) Have you been required to obtain a wetland delineation certified by the US Army Corps of Engineers?
IV No ❑ Yes If yes, please attach to application submission.
Stormwater BMPs:
23) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No LV'Yes — If yes, please briefly describe: P IT ARN-A 129C54 V il
24)D..00ees this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
Kl No ID Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
25) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility?
SNa ❑ Yes
Page 5 of 9
SWU-NCG02-NOI last revised 6/7/2010

NCG020000 N.Q.I.
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
26) Will mine dewatering discharges occur? (An ATC/ATO is required for wastewater treatment facilities'
dewatering discharges where E&SC devices alone will not meet effluent limits and/or protect water quality
standards).
® No
❑ Yes
27) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur? (ATC or ATO required,
unless closed -loop recycle system)
L1� No
❑ Yes
If yes, answer the following questions for each wastewater treatment system:
Please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process wastewater. Give
design specifics (i.e. design volume, retention time, surface area, etc.). Existing treatment facilities
should be described in detail, and design criteria or operational data should be provided (including
calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General Permit. [Use
separate sheet(s)]
b. Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the
chemical additive
Note: Please see our website for a list of evaluated polyacrylamide (PAMS) products for use in North Carolina.
Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event?
❑ No ❑ Yes
28) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
®"No
❑ Yes If so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design requirements for
treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.)
Other:
29) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
NNo ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg
hazardous waste?
6/No ❑ Yes
or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste:
Page 6 of 9
SW U-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010

NCG020000 N.O.I.
How is material stored:
Where is material stored:
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport / disposal vendor:
Vendor address:
30) Are you applying for a mining permit in the same location as a previously permitted mine?
N(No
❑ Yes If yes, specify permit number and name if known:
31) Does your site have an active landfill within the mining permit boundary?
A
❑ Yes If yes, specify type: ❑ LCID ❑ Other:
32) Is your facility providing appropriate secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials? See permit
to online for secondary containment requirements.
I No
❑ Yes
Final Checklist:
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included and
initialed for. Please show that the following required information has been included by initialing in each
space below.
Fee of $100 made payable to NCDENR
Completed application and ail supporting documents
Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status
Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads
Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc.
2 copies of large-scale site plan with topographical lines with all outfalls, applicable buffers and wetlands
clearly delineated
A copy of your DLR mining permit
A copy of your US Army Corps -approved wetland delineation if you marked "yes" to question 22 above.
If mine site is in one of the 20 Coastal Counties,
• Applicant has checked with the appropriate regional office to verify the need for a Coastal State
Stormwater permit. Regional Office Contact:
• Applicant has included a detailed list of impervious surface areas and percentages, sub -drainage
areas and total drainage area.
If the mine is dewatering and near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface waters or groundwater,
include the following and contact your local regional office about a Pumping 0&M Plan (see below
for contact information). You may be required to provide an approved Pumping O&M plan prior to
NCG02 issuance.
2 copies of detailed Full Size Plans delineating areas on the plans and fisting acreage (including:
wetlands, ditches, well -placements, pits, borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater controls/BMPs,
vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins, product process (such as screening, stockpiles, waste
piles), total drainage area, impervious surface percentages (if state sw programs apply), applicable
buffers, and access and/or haul roads).
Well information (design, depths, maintenance)
Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas
Settling pond sizing information, if applicable
Page 7 of 9
SWU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6f712010

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Level spreader design, if applicable
Details about dewatering method
Cone of influence calculations
Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding
Description & information about 401/404 permits that have been obtained
Copy of US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineations or approved wetland delineation (if
applicable)
have contacted my local regional office about a Pumping O&M Plan.
Regional Office Contact: Date contacted:
O"/
V 1 will not any impact nearby wetlands, surface waters or groundwater by dewatering.
If an ATC or ATO is required, three (3) sets of plans, specifications, and design calculations, signed, sealed,
and dated by a P.E. ATC and ATO requirements in NCG02000 are summarized in Table 1 on Page 2 of
this NOI (see the permit text for more details). Plans shall show all pertinent design features, including the
location of the outfail(s). If stormwater is flowing off -site, the plan must show that stormwater will not be
mixed with wastewater.
Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material tact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. i understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit:
1. I agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid
mining permit must be attached to this request.
2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore.
3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate
protection so as to contain all spills on the site.
4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules
governing solid waste disposal.
5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to
not result in contamination of the surface or ground waters.
Page 8 of 9
5WU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6/7/2010

NCG020000 N.O.I.
agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my knowledge
and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
s 4 l�l Printed Name of Person i ning: _ I V I Ch WA 1' : Pa v 1/—( {�— , 1' {�
E
Title: e
VL
(Signature of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money orderfor $100.00 made payable to NCDENR.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area.
DWQ Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ......
[phone]
Fayetteville Office ...
[phone]
Mooresville Office ...
[phone]
Raleigh Office ........
[phone]
Washington Office ...(252)
946-6481
Wilmington Office ...
[phone]
Winston-Salem ......
[phone]
Central Office .........(919)
807-6300
Page 9 of 9
5WU-NCG02-NOI Last revised 6)7/2010

Wehner, Judy
From: Willis, Linda
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 T30 AM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Wehner, Judy
Subject: RE: Circle P Farm O & M Plan
Mr. Parker,
I think I've already commented on this, however, I didn't clear the message so I'm just
making sure The 0 & M looks good. From our visit (Joanne and I), it appeared you would
be a good distance from any creeks and/or wetlands. That should provide adequate distance
for protection given the site topography.
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or
other regulations.**
-----Original Message -----
From: parker4pec.rr.com Finailto:parl<[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 4:04 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: Circle P-Farm 0 & M Plan
Linda, please review and forward any comments to [e-mail].
Thank you, Ginger Parker
W�, �71 � ��

CALCULATIONS FOR DISCHARGE WATER
@ CIRCLE P FARM
1. Existing Storage/Infiltration Pond Bata:
Size 5.50 AC
T7U 1.._...a: .1 ' 1 'T'
Y1.1-lkl L.1�:ti:tlti ,'
Seasonal Water Level 27.25 FT
Freeboard 7.25 FT
Maximum Storage Capacity (gallons):.
r ne� �n x r e n z_ •t eQ Gal
rr,_. 1 one n� I
_ .SI., : s._ :i �_, 5��1., qF.. AC x 7.25 1'T ; _T., :i�r;_ ! _1 i = -r 3 allcslti5
Infiltration Rate on-med/fine sand =. 15 gal per day per sq.ft
Allowable Infiltration in gals per day:
5.50 AC x 43,560 SF/AC x .15 gal/sf/day = 35,937 gallon/day
Evaporation in gals. per day:.05 gal/sflday
5.50 AC x 4.3,560 SPAC x .05 gallsf/day = 11,979 gal/day
Total Absorption/ Evaporation per day: 47,916 gallons
r11T -ons. based unon y iL_, r
o{i ng';nTin-.eC lcat
Centrifugal @ 3600 rpm
&ci'agc absorb,cvup. alo wcr.
12,992,423 gals
500 gpm x 60 min/hr w 433 days
Allowable Absorption/Evaporation:
47,916 gals/day x 433 days = 506,040 gals
506,040 gals
500 gpm x 60 min/hr = 17 days
Maximum Consecutive Run Time = = 450 days
Thcr6hrr- the caTi .lesion I() this analyrds; the sirigle riumin iiicration could nin 450
days consecutively to dewater this borrow pit and not overtop the storage pond. This
analysis does not allow four rainfall. The /pit operation should monitor dewaptering. and
rN�LLl�.al1 {�LnuVMt�Lj MA W 4�r\V�!'A.LIJV l ��llJ V VW1;Wl Vil Jlio iclU �ilV .�14%Jp V,i�.R+� 4,LLllZ� �V��jy
rainfall seasons. This dewatering operation should only run only 6-8 hours per day to
keep the water at a level to excavate the borrow pit.

Circle P Farm
200 Chris Street
Newport, NC 28570
O & M Plan
RECEIVED
AU6 2 5 toll
LAND QUALITY SEC non
August 23, 2011
The O & M Plan for 20.0 Acre Borrow Pit will consist of the following
criteria:
1. Pump: 240V- 500 gal/min discharge
2. Storage.Pond-- 5.5. acres:.with;7.'2'S�'.ft._freeboard-,
3. Storage Capacity — 12,993,423 gallons
4. Staff Gauge — Located on North side showing freeboard in feet
and inches
Operation of this borrow pit discharge shall be done on a daily basis with
observations of water volume to be discharged versus storage capacity
availability. Factors which will be considered are rainfall events,
temperature & humidity and overall ground water table.
Discharge operation shall cease when conditions are not acceptable for
storage and increases as suitable conditions return.
In no case will discharge be allowed when storage level approaches
conditions of overtopping of freeboard.
W.F. Parker
Owner/Operator

`1 )
i
Certified Mail
Mr. Parker
Page Two
6. Provide proof, such as copies of the signed return receipts from certified mail, that
the adjoining landowners and county manager have been properly notified. If the
proposed mine is located within a town/city limits, then the town/city manager must
also be notified.
7. Provide an original, signed and notarized affidavit of notification.
8. Provide proof (such as a signed letter) that the adjoining property owner and mine
operator (Mr. Styron) has given permission for you to discharge water into the 5.5
acre "existing storage and infiltration pond." If you now own the property, please
clarify the status of that mine and whether you intend to transfer it to yourself. If you
do intend to transfer it to yourself, please provide an anticipated date for your
transfer request.
9. It appears that an O&M plan will be necessary for this site. Please contact Linda
Willis with the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) at [phone] to discuss. If an
O&M plan is ultimately required by DWQ, please provide a copy of your approvable
O&M plan to this office as well.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed above
have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of the
requested information to my attention at the following address. -
Land Quality Section
Division -of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1612

Rodgers, Ashley
From: Willis, Linda
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:51 PM
To: Rodgers, Ashley
Subject: RE: 16-72 DLR - Water Quality Review Sheet 2010
Attachments: D00071911circle p.pdf
Did I respond on this one yet?
From: Rodgers, Ashley
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:32 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Cc: Shiver, Rick; Sams, Dan
Subject: 16-72 DLR - Water Quality Review Sheet 2010
Linda,
Attached is a mining review form for a new permit application in Carteret County. Please let me know if you have any
questions. The application packet will be routed today.
Thanks!
Ashley

MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REti iLW FORM
for the
DIVIS10N OF WATER QUALITY
THIS St(; i iuN I u Ut NLLtu UU 1 UY. uLK.'
Cad k(CT-
Project Dame:-DLR Permit #: County: . Address:
i YES NO
I..,.
Is this mine a new mine? '
Have land disturbing activities
i
started? Date? 17
Latitude: Longitude: r
Please return comments to (at DLR CO): l L
1 Comments due by: 7-.2q.2-0 (
SECTION BELOW. TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWQ:
Date Commencing
is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water quality?
Comments:-'-,... to �u-arid. c�csr.��;-�.sc'• a. v�ri� r� T�
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: r-'
DWQ Compliance Status of Mine: 110--
YES
NO
l`a'ME
v
� ..., i •�
N.
k}.WN
I
W111
NPDES permit existing?
(Permit #
)
tt7
"' 7
i F. i y s�y'�f � � •,
� 1. � ���r 't
�
�. '
, `
'
,�,
Y'" 7t�,''�" 5
�
�
l
Should permittee contact DWQ RO
immediately? (e.g. to schedule a site visit if
M RO Contact
Name:
mine has already begun digging or is
Contact Reason:
dewatering without DWQ permit)
`` �' .-t,.. •r7i'S, ,.• s �!i{ - Rri•
i t"" 't � Kati
ry c s � . , 4 ���
i�,,. - �.,
401 Wetland Cert. existing?
177 7 Permit #
r Wr'� �.
,f ' �•.
��'�
Jul
� '
'
,-, � � �,, �
, i
;,�
,,�
ao„ cantamnPr �ntin

YES NO
r � ti `' iy'syj � e• �y�a � liL �l�e . , � � �
�-• , ` '�, ,•G �' ��� � .� y , x ,, ,' �� �
� , ..1. .,;
��z��
-�
f
Does DWQ RO suspect or know of nearby
�-
wetlands to the site?
' f ON�;
' # : }�' 3 �
4� aanrl � �1 t id 1 �,
'�., j
• r . � ��
>•
I
Stream Determination Needed?
f^
`
I. i d
d V
I ` dff{{�� ! 11
I'. 1 l � 1 ,1 '^i %��% �y��.j•L j '' 1
G �� 1
I`�
i / < b��fa�
,
Does DW0 RO need a statement that no
wetlands/streams are disturbed
If
for this project from applicant?
���jj �'5(
1,
Buffer Determination Completed?
ev
New Recycle System permit required?'
C7
Enough Information to determine?
l
' f , :�. ,t -;' d5
I ..! l� ' rx �ma �?�r •ii"h
�?' N ! Ae•
Will wastewaters discharge to HQW waters
with a 7Q14-0? **'j 014 5tq%k t
flow;
Unknown (permittee determine);
1 VTf�l�t;1 �t
�l
r ,� i ' .+, '� f "
�
u1Y 'rrl
�,
_ ('ji'•j�' ' A, � r 'I"I� r �. '1�f }�q , ��
1 n�
e�;h �,
�
'}^ i'i�� � �
•; a. X3 srt''2
I ,5�� l � � =r
,
` I
-A• � � �' yyjj • Y. ;1 '� ��ld
t j r r} �7 T s= 1 4�'{± -�
�,�ye� 1 � � i
�'�
,. '/ 1
'�'d•}'Z4
1 . -3 4 "}\:k� : '74:•!1721: '$
s•� ry .5,� =L..
i
�'W 12 . ?, � - �� — �l
r N•./
�41 � ,
Mine must wait to dewater until an O&M
plan is approved?
systems that do -not meet those criteria are considered dischaLging systems, and are subject to fhe NCG020000 discharge permit
"To obtain 7010 flows, permittoes must contact the DWO Stormwater Permitting Unit. It DWQ does not have a flow estimate for a
specific stream, permitlees will be asked to obtain one. Permittees should contact J. Curtis Weaver at the USGS: 919-571-4043, for
more information on obtaining a 7010 flaw. USGS will not determine a 7010 flow for tidally influenced wafer bodies.
Reviewed by:
DWQ RO Surface Water:•_ Regional Offcewl�b Date: 1-),& n, of I
RO Aquifer Protection Section: Regional Office: Date:
SPt1 DWQ Central Office Reviewer (if applicable)-
•�4�t�.#`�t�-� �K1s.S,A�:-l�'�L,tJ.�.L�l �.yl-i,�'1 ��� LSJi.�. Y���� ..}tom-I�..L�.�.'�- �-t�`' 0. C�-l..'�4.�'U rJ
cu, Yl0be
ao„AAnIomN �nin n

APPLICATION FOR A MINING t`ERMIT
(Jv W r\i Ul-
�' } � c�
W
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of Mine 81 1-de f [—A lZo County ,f' ,il
River Basin WVt t-[ e Oav
Latitude (decimal degrees to four places) M-0 4 4' ¢ • 3�7
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places) -kv �41 '� I Zrjrr
2. Name of Applicant*
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** S 5
0,00� 0(trft.,4
Telephone agi -} 2Q I - om Alternate
4. Mine Office Address d S I ' W -C r�
S. Mine Manager
L(t av, VC4-VkaL-
Telephone M i r 0� 7 �
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
'Signature
* Signature LW� +4'V►+ C
Print Name ,, h 1 G IK V—
Title Ow ktiy 14,gw fP Z—
Date t, iZS 2r)1 l
This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
* * The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.

r
APPLICATION FOR A MINING eERMIT
NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly.. answered (re(gar{dsiing your mining operation
1
for the in- eudcal 'Life of th. mun-C. All res,,.,. scs. i2.ust be tti earl; conveyed oa of c0r. Lst,Vl1da g, diii%llid
mine map.
A. CENER.yL CHARr.CTE4'.STICS OE I'yE M&NE
1. Y11f
wer all of the following that apply: .
this is an ap, 'plication for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
_
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit' fee will be based upon): 2u. 9_k>
r "0 1 , ram,.., < , C) . C>o
vi tl�ls acl'eagG, �U��' !l]UCIt 1J UWl1CU a,t�l ltow iI1i1411 1J 1LQJC'�1 Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
❑ If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
a the n a! /n�� r�M a`r an,- nnirered y v nn r�yn.-n it- Mining ) —it N
r, t t ,, , 4 ,e L b, the e.astl � t,= l e c;..
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon):
❑ If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining PermitNo.: Total permitted acreage:
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved I ermitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No ❑. if yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No ❑. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.:
d:stL;r1 cd, 'gr:}'�-.-d v'r'%I' i�iiiliv.,A) 1%- 4" iiiii�iii� Qp�:`ut.rL'S T� El (: no,��Irls:iv'i
modification" fee of $100.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added)_ If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the
.� total acreage
to be added to the pe—nnit is the acrca2e thfit the "I aior modification" fe.c v41I1 be based Upton),.
❑ If this is do application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the tnta! (overa!!) ucr4t. e covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: Total permitted acreage:
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE R QJU STED I'IJRMiT ACTION(S) AND gCORRESPOGNDiN-i; ACREAI-IiE
NOTED ABOVE
3. Mining method:
n gvdraL-lie Dredge Front-end+ L.o. der & T. r.:ck_ . Shovel & Tr,tek
❑ Dragline & Truck ❑ Self -loading Scraper
Other (explailx):

r
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet)
Depth is relative to what benchmark?
V
b. Expected average depth of mime (feet) 15i
groun lev I men sea level, road elevation, etc.)
MU11
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes ❑ No 5?�
If yes, when and by whom was ihis activity conducted?
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum):_ 10 (lea � _
...
B. MAPS
Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six 6 copies of a 7.5-minute
quadrangle and a county highway snap. These maps, in addition to six (6) copies of all mine maps
and reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-minute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
1612 Mail Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 5`h floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
wwxv- aeolourv, enr. state. tic. us/
County highway maps may be obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Mailing Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
1587 Mail Service Center 3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587 Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
NN,'rvw.ncdot.of'g/it/,isContact/detault.html
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on
the maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining
permits can only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only
denote those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit.
All maps must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate
the following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.

}
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
gg Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i, Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acrea 7e of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of plann2 and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the -lessor -of the mine tract; names -of owners. of -record of tracts. adjoining- these tracts; that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek, stream, river, or
other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or otherpublic right-of-way. if an adjoining tract is owned
or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of
tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be
provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel or less
and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3, North. arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE
MAP SCALE
0-49 Acres
1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres
1 inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres
I inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)
-4-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING eERMIT
4ui•lt/viiui s i'u �t %,- piv�},iiicu vll 1.1- nine ril ip i:iai tilarly t1 e .,.p irvi of
tailings/sediment ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other
major_ aspect of the mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining
r. 4 A 4n1.�n� 4,n.F a`�,v..�n 4 4ti,o {' �� �j ].. 4nt'
{ i'rilIt. .Z k vlw c,Iart sh,nn lar to hke lot LovV lli4 vl ili „e ili+ c4�tcivt�:
CATEGORY I AFFECTED ACREAGE
�, .. � -
_ 1 u1111��'s1�1'.11liii�lit ru{►u� .. _
Stockpiles
Wastepiles
Processing Area/Haul Roads t �6
Mine Excavation
v+Ihcr i 1-7xnInIn
Total Disturbed Acreage
NOTE:
11 ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANV SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PR0 Vil)FIl TN T E ANSWERS T(1 TO_E .FOLLOWING QurSTIONS
IN '1'HiS APPLICATION FORM (YLE SENOIE TIIT'-JTALIC,IZED'QVE TIONS/S7A!'LGMEN7S
T1fROUG11DUT THE FOW. T APPLICATION WILL. NOT BE CONSIDERED
COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON
'FHE i IN-111 NliAFS.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING eFRMIT
r, 1-1 LC rrr nr N,. rLrrL�L 1-1 QfIV LS
Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and
rP.l-ri %ft i' Ills 1. tf +'4fi Il- Itif. ff li- IliifjJl �l/. ii ei [iL&I 41ul.littel- IL SIM' �tJ i1J ii4 ti 4l.
i, i�(AV ATG biZA XOaiwn PI Ri1M7TFR- oF' UI6 ao�R�;,L P i�
W ok bVt "Tb RAM lv kilk i �rA t9J T PxsQ2 Cr aPP V� TIUQ
2 , �14 1 4� ► �174it� �S S46) POW, Un W' At$ :'{eft- `ry R C<d'D
�ri?J�S,ir! '�'-i��th �Z� Z►A't�IJ
3 : ter -,eft Lh OF PCT �VILL
PDT.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s). waste wiles. accessfrnine roads- and process areas). and give a detailed sequence
or instaiiation and schedule for maimenance of tine measures. Locate ana iavet au sectitnent and
erosion control measures on the mine maps) and provide typical cross-sections/construction details
of each measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any
i31Proposed
i,�v.»,..a .! rl3 iivJ.
r
w i`TM 4k-S CR, JTQSClL UJ-ff JJ ev/"5,J ..
TkaI Utki1,.A, SI�Qf�,� 'FOe — 'VOkb S�i�U-A,4 Air O Ok/ Ai L
'!Dk*S WlL>
2: PcL- ". 4�acT- P6..c'. ' 4s Q�-Q D
P�ckfi eft. ouT Sin e lc 44-O E u, AAL
ki 1 1 t t�; f �'Di;�. �p Lt itii ids .
3. a. t t e operation involve Vhing the materi mined, recycling process water, or other
wastewater handling? Yes❑ Noif yes, briefly describe all such processes including any
chemicals to be used.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the thihb br plant as a point
discharge to the waters of the State? Yes ❑ No V !f yes, briefly describe the nature of the
discharge. and locate all proposed discharge Points, (along with their method of stabilization) on your
mine mapp).

wj
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the w 'ter table? Yes t/ No ❑.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes ❑ No M.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal
rate in gallons per day: Locate all existing wells on the mine maps) that
lie within 500 feet of the proposed excavation area. Provide data to support any conclusions or
statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and current water
withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water system or
private wells.
d . If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) from
the Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to
register water use with the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than 10,000
gallons per day and needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if the
operation ties in a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes ❑ No l�J.
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
-Jo0 c► 1&i, wc�?'V
Eff'-A Fo ko Pf-1,3 AWL
AT APNIoPol ATE
—�Utcf'e_ la
'FQ-E-.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
15. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s) for all fill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburden
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, installation of any benches
and/or slope drains (%,ith supporting design information) if needed, and the method of final
stabilization.
u JA
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes including
specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must be provided on the
mine map(s).
NIA
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -sections
of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety, benches and
mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
Nip
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to be used must be indicated on the mine map(s).
VeKr ��►��. i-t'�ry ��'
.9-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No V❑/
If yes, how will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening, the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or other
measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map(s) and provide cross -sections
through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species for tree plantings.
KI WA VKAMU O is JS0l VR—b E�-ill PAL( P12V'04
�1t `l Lit j1 { 4"it,+` 1<�. Lk,(_ Q31 iR t C-f
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
11. WiIl explosives be used? Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring properly from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Depending on the mine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information may be
required on the blasting program (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest o,J site occupied
structure(s) to the proposed excavations) on the mine map and indicate its approximate distance to the
proposed excavation.
12. WiIl fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes ❑ No
Ifyes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case ofspill. Indicate
the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
- to-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or establishment
of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. This
information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with the information
provided on the mine rnap(s). In addition, design information, including typical cross -sections, of any
permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the locations) of all permanent
channels_must be indicated on the reclamation map.
:F, qq.( v ed au c4 t.�, - ix-- `:i i > 11 �(l�Gl � o -i-
21
4�C 4�tit r10C91L(LYLtF-'t `-t��
i Ic �t
Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes [f No ❑.
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
crass -sections) through the proposed body(s) of water. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish?. Yes ❑ No Z
If yes, specify species.
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
PJA

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Indicate the method(s) o f reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine waste
areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for such
areas must be provided on the reclamation map.
N !-A
a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
V l'h
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes ❑ No e
fyes, identify such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and ditch
line stabilization.
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables, or
other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off site generated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without pEaor written approval
from the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and either
the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit has been
issued by DWM for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this application. All
temporary and permanent refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated on the mine map(s) and
reclamation map, along with a list of items to be disposed in said areas.
P JA
-12-

E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be used to establish an appropriate bond (based upon a
range oi..Sjuu to R),000 per qjJ cted ac:rej for each permitted mine sire based upon the acreage approved
by the Department to be affected during the life of the mining permit. Please insert the approximate
Wo.
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
RECLAMATION
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE*
COST
TailingsiSedirnent i'onds:
Ac.
X
$
/tLc.
_ $
Stockpiles:
Ac.
X
$
/Ac..
_ $
Wastepiles:
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
— $
Processinu Area/Hatt] Roads:
_ Ac.
X
$
1000— /Ac.
— $_1_44f —
Mine Excavation:
,Q Ac.
,X
$
'D% /Ac.
_ $10,0,7
Other:
Ac.
X
S
/Ac.
= S
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.:
D%�' Ac.
(TOTAL PERMITTF..D AC.:
Ac.)
Temporary & Permanent Sedimentation & Erosion Control Measures_
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existinc! excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be graded for positive drainage where measures
wi'li be needed to prevent ottsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsite watercourses anti wetiands.
a) Internal Drainage _ ?Jj -O0 Ac.
b) Positive Drainage ogiG Ac. X $1,500.00
S11NTOTAL COST: S
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X eT.19TOTAI. COST: $ ��.�G � X Permit rife (I to In years): io
INFLATION COST: $ �Z
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COS"C + INFLA"I'ION COST = $ 13A&
i
.[Total Reclamation Bond Cost: $ i 4-0o r
(round down to the nearest $100.00)

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for_ygLu-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and type
of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings is
not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, specialists
and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest Resources at
North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
c. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources;
is N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
g. N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as .may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre): z' --W/k) JAZ,
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION popds/ac � �� j �
G��- r
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Seed Types: Seeding Dates: Seeding Rates:
00 MM 4-i 9 1 �31
ClAn 9N631
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF ANCHORING:
VAMT SW k7 W&'44j�'
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS — TYPE, (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Signature
by:
Date *411 T
Print Name . L&J; U Ii,, t- u 4 K L r ,
Title LL A( W re- t— — - -
Agency
- 13 -

APPLICATION FOR A MINING t'ERMIT
"F .DJ A. IT OI' NO IFIC TTOT
Via
(vw _ T",
_ _�-' „_!„_, an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant, for
it 171C N11441uig ► �:iMIL, 0j" a ill�.uilii iiii0il vt uii titiJLlli iviltittip t aii'tiii ti} auu icuiu iv uli piiiiiittCu arcu, iivul the
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, being first duly.sworn, do hereby attest that the
following are all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining nerr , t," ndar}') and that notice of the pending appl.catl^n has been caused to be mail" (� 1, certified or
....., ..� F.,...... o u �. s.. ..,� a.�•. . ...
registered mail, return receipt requested, to said owners of record at their addresses shown below, such notice
being given on a form provided by the Department:
EiYuio
ni.-
- L-uii.aiv+1•i LCA iu'
Ake 0
A
,7,
Ni ev ik. 190-IL Z
(Attach additional list if necessary)
I do also attest that the following individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
irvhich any part of the pciirnitttid area Is located and that noticc of the pcndiiig application has b wc � � u �Ai,iS% to i3C
mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to said office at the following address:
�� c e er mot, i a_-. l
_•11�C� ri �ll�iill lr[�ttl'� . f iccr N'alnic) a A Ei1L$5 )
[i.e.' City Manage ,County Manager, Mayor, etc.] 1 Z_ do
L541
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to' the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of
land that are adioinine the mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by
the applicant or is owned by the lessor or We mine tract, al l owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that
are within I,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or
municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located in compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50(bl) and 15A
NCAC 51B .0_1004(d). 1 u.-idcrstand, that it is tl.c rc-spa+nsii Rity of th;� appliow.t to ,clot:: the .4.,. =1;t� of n:iiila
showing that the above notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
UL�al_
70701-, V� 1
Signature of Applicant or Agent Date
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following information:
Name of applicant:
title of person exec':iing kffid.aivil
1,
a Notary Public of the County of
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit was made by him/her.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of 20
Xvirtart': Mitt iiiiIli .SS10-11
expires:

APPLICATION FOR A MININt. PERMIT
-(-kFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
' 7
an applicant, or an agent, or employee of an applicant, for
a new Mining Permit. or a modification of an existing Mining Permit to acid land to the permitted urea, from tltc
N.C. Ih-partment of Environment and Natural Resources. tieing first duly sworn, do hereby attest that the
following are all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts (if land that are adjoining the
mining permit houndary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the
mini-1- permit h(,iundan l and that notice of the pending- applica ier has be-pn caused to be mailed, by certified ur
registered trail, return receipt requested, to said owners of record at their addresses shown below, such notice
being given on a form provided by the Department:
(,'1:ljainil.z,p"awuerNatt.e) fi6
L�.� �T� Ad-c: t3f�i' IIJ�7
G tP•4`i� ve Vit/, ( PY O i1 tJZ
(Attach additional list if necessary)
I do also attest that the following individual is the: chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
W,,!ch any fart of ihV pern-iimud area is located and that noticc of the pending application has Heel. caused w be
mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to said office at the following address:
(Chief .''-idnai ntstr at.t v'c Oiiiccr Naniei (Address)
[i.e.: City Manager, County Manager, Mayor.. etc.]
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of
land that are adjoining the minime permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is awned or leased by
the applicant or is owned by nit- lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that
are within 1,000 feet of the miming permit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or
hmunici,p_ality in which any ,part of the permitted area is located incompliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50(bl) and 15A
1 \�C. i�... .�" .0004(d), i iii.dc staid e,li'ait it i atiC i�:i�vii:iiiiilYtj' of(�tlhe uppii��uiit Lo i=1- file iC�MJJL; v1 iiiueliiir
showing that the above notice were cattsed to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
�dl iL. 4 _ .30740 !i
Signature of Applicant or Agent w Date
if person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following, information:
Name of applicant:
TWC ofperson e-ecuting ,lffiid ��it
a Notary Public of the County of
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
appeared before ere this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit was made by him/her.
Witness niv hand and notarial seal. this day of 20
ni_V iiiii'SS e_iii
expires:

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations as
may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S. 74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation_ which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature: L� /4 ° t
Print Name: tj,((Q 141 _ Q 1r e
(Title, if applicable)
Company
(If applicable)
Address.
�t �`' �'C�
Uu P Oki - fiat e f , fic
2 1
Telephone: (z5t, M f -cz
Date Signed:
APPLICANT:
Signature:*
Print Name: K t l 4 Q Yh
Title: CUJAF —
Company:
Mine Name: I-C (e— +aov�
Telephone:
Date Signed: A -701701
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application,
One original and five (5) copies of the completed application, six (6) copies of all location maps, mine maps
and reclamation maps, and the appropriate processing„fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check
or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be
sent to the Land Quality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application
form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-18-

CALCULATIONS FOR DISCHARGE WATER
@ CIRCLE P FARM
I. Existing Storage/Infiltration Pond Data:
Size 5.50 AC
z�Fi�I-IC.,,-,i-,or, 3 t ;%; F i'
Seasonal Water Level 27.25 FT
Freeboard 7.25 FT
Maximum Storage Capacity (gallons):
n A -+ n ! A 11 'R rt r.•-r T a b 1 J l-`. �. t 1-nr1 .t--% I
5-5. rR._ x �3-5 0 : F.rr�. x r.w5 r I \ r.�r„ C', tf� _u-N = i-,`737_,��, na 11�17�
Infiltration Rate on med/fine sand = .15 gal per day per sq,ft
Allowable Infiltration in gals per day:
5.50 AC x 43,560 SF/AC x .15 gal/sf/day = 35,937 gallon/day
Evaporation in gals. per day:.05 gal/sf/day
5.50 AC x 43,560 SF/AC x .05 gal/sf/day = 11,979 gal/day
Total Absorption/ Evaporation per day: 47,916 gallons
If t 71rt1�. Tlltle ;_. 1 Ciiaatif)Fic; i£t��Cl Llii ii [it1 i� s t1p t t4i�lt1i3
Centrifugal @ 3600 rpm
�1, .,n, I r•-, ism„•T�I,•n•• n1i: ,:rn,^�1
12,992 423 gals
500 gpm x 60 min/hr x 24 hr/day = 18 days
Allowable Absorption/Evaporation:
47,916 gals/.day x 18 days = 862,498 gals
862,48$_g31s
500 gpm x 60 min/hr x 24 hr/day = 1.2 days
Maximum Consecutive Run Time = = 19.2 days
iii, Ground W.iicr C.iicu1.7ii011q Tier Verse.
7.5 acre pit
9.5 acre pit
Volume
9-7:,4s: '�TJ
2,443,716 gal/ft
3,095,374 gal/ft
Pumping Days
3.39
4.30

Conclusion:
Usini2 the i-Ed-culatio€]s ane, inflornintit7n. the 'DoT ca nit or)eraiion 0. delvite -in
1
one pond at a time and lowering the groundwater in one foot intervals, the storage
pond is four times the required size based upon thelargestpit needing 3.30 days to
lower It Jill. foot .;s l:. the w110 R1]c .rVll�\t NLl 1M11 L1liA\ 1V1 ll�t JLVi µCS
pond is 19.2 days.
If you have any questions, please call me at 252-241-0376.
Respectfully, /j
W&a4'A
William F. Parker, P.I.
c*RN
ESS~iQ�;$4
Sr A
bwe4coo�.• ,..
Seal

Serving You With Only Superior Irrigation Products and Services
�` rR�is�rrr�a! rerc_ .
YOURSOURCEFOR
DOBBS FLOATING PUMPS
Valley Systems
rgal pump
Center Pivot Insurance
Irrigation Equip. Financing
reparation
Used Equipment
Sub -Surface Drip Irrigation
:er no priming
Pumps, Motors & Filters
K-Line Irrigation
:er revel.
PipeANire a Underground
Id screen are
a d
Ater.
,,t
A 6 I Tr eve le rs
: to.
Micro Rain Travelers
Automated Monitoring
to recycle or
ty, trashy
Custom Steel Fabrication
inoff water
'" Wit- '.'
• For many years Dobbs Floating Pumps have been
Full Service Chart IL No zzling
`.,,a _..: � , � =�
the leader In major irrigation areas, pumping from
V.
, r
lakes, rivers, lagoons and irrigation recovery pits.
See Level
United Wireless
?�
• Thousands of Dobbs Floating Pumps have been
5yniha Glass
and still are, Irrigating millions of acres of
�
gyp, ;6'" 'k
america's most productive farmland.
Design Engineering
.`w
Gallery
-�a,....`'w
>-�.�:r it ., `
�
• industry, towns and contractors are finding our
Contact Us
' ;�
F,i}+ -, * 4 .
electric floating pumps more practical than other
9 p
type pumps for most surface water applications...
Related Links
just as Irrigation farmers did 20 to 30 years ago.
Contact Teeter Irrigation, Inc. for more information
HOME J Valley Systems J Insurance J Financing U Used Equipment J sub Surface Drip J Pumps & More
Pipe/Wire J A81 Hard Hose Travelers J Monitoring J Steel ratrrication J Chart & Nozzling u See Level
K-line J United wireless J Syntho Glass J Design & Engineering u Gallery J Caritact ifs J Related Links
Copyright C 2004 - 2006 Teeter Irrigation, Inc. - Ulysses, Kansas
All rights reserved. Legalyisdaimei - Site hosted by Pioneer Internet
webmasterPpId.com
http://www.teeterirrigation.com/pmf/dobbsFIoating.htrn 6/17/2011 t

CALCULATIONS FOR DISCHARGE WATER
a CIRCLE P FARM
1. Existing Storage/Infiltration fond Data:
Size 5.50 AC
1 i , 'Jc ti$io„ 34,50) 17
Seasonal Water Level 27.25 FT
Freeboard 7.25 FT
Maximum Storage Capacity (gallons):
c cn A f, I' c!_n Cl t� I A fl __ ^7 '1c 10"j" 7,49 ' 17!, ra _ -1 'l nn'+ 4'1 '1 �S..
_i.?4l /:4_. X tl,_;Utf 't11tAt- -- 7.L_i [ !r; t.il to t_. �-IJ 7_— IG.77G1-iG} {jai31l Vi4:
Infiltration Rate on med/fine sand = .15 gal per day per sq.ft
Allowable Infiltration in gals per day:
5.50 AC x 43,560 SF/AC x .15 gal/sf/day = 35,937 gallon/day
Evaporation in gals. per day:.05 gal/sf/day
5.50 AC x 43,560 SF/AC x .05 gaVsf/day = 11,979 gal/day
Total Absorption/ Evaporation per day: 47,916 gallons
t r n m r 1 t�S 1 �i rti t 1- :' r,1
i -11's t 7iIfC i_.0 II_.1_ttfifilfilC, lxase—d [roof ! 7f71 n, tIn t 'Innfing
Centrifugal @ 3600 rpm a ,
4JLVlub4 `lilt uVJVl V! V Y uj.7. uitV 1'14.µf.
12,992,423 gals
500 gpm x 60 min/hr = 433 days
Allowable Absorption/Evaporation:
47,916 gals/day x 433 days = 506,040 gals
506.040 gals
500 gpm x 60 min/hr = 17 days
Maximum Consecutive Run Time = = 450 days
TIICr 'fo-r„ 1hic Ct,ncliision to,1.tlis -in.flvRis: II-ic lirlglc i,tiillkl,f 1,fnc 'll0r! coilld riin Ad
days consecutively to dewater this borrow pit and not overtop the storage pond. This
analysis does not allow for rainfall. The pit operation should monitor dewatering and
- 1, Tr.�� . ,}L` /"t uyrtfl+a r-t?llll F'a ar IA i�iYlri � r.l �i •••• •-�lnea�r� I��a .. r•. •• iu. �rr....� I. �a.l. rar
lµili l,{}A 4L�1�V I.Ll •,.i u1LaA al�i�faV a1 �! i rl V�J Vi II vii JitV Vialµ Vim' J4�J1JV11�.+V \+ �..a lei lAi� aiV lJ r �'
rainfall seasons. This dewatering operation should only run only 6-8 hours per day to
keep the water at a level to excavate the borrow pit.

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to:
William F. Parker
Circle P Farm - Styron Pit
Carteret County - Permit No. 16-21
for the operation of a
Sand Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
, greatest practical degree of protection and restoration.
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATIGN DATE: December 16, 2015

Page 3
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until December 16, 2015.
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and to
the following conditions and limitations:
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
-Management Commission.
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact the
Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary stormwater permits or other
approval documents.
2. A. Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shalt be subject to the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air Quality.
B. During mining operations, water trucks or other means that may be necessary
shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted area.
3. A. Sufficient buffer (minimum 30 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway or wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the
integrity of the natural watercourse or wetland.
B. A 30-foot buffer, as indicated in Operating Condition No. 3A, shall be re-
established in a timely manner along all permit boundaries and waterways and
wetlands if a lesser buffer exists.
C. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission.
4. A. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.

Page 4
B. All drainage from the affected areas around the mine excavations shall be
diverted internal to said excavations.
C. Diversion ditches and sediment traps shall be constructed and maintained (in lieu
of silt fence) to prevent sedimentation of nearby wetlands. In addition, adequate
outlet protection shall be installed and maintained at the discharge points to
prevent erosion and off -site sedimentation.
D_ Mining activities shall be conducted as indicated on the mine map last revised
January 10, 2007 and received by the Land Quality Section on September 27,
2011.
5. A. All mining permit boundaries (90.7 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site
on 100-foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals.
B. All buffer zones along waterways, wetlands, and property lines shall be
permanently marked at the site on 100-foot intervals unless the line of sight
allows for larger spacing intervals.
6. The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle, which can be
retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause off -site damage because of sedimentation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
7. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
8. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the mine
and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the operation from the public.
9. A. Sufficient buffer (minimum of 30 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between
any excavation and any mining permit boundary to protect adjacent property.
B. A 30-foot buffer, as indicated in Operating Condition Nos. 3A and 9A, shall be re-
established in a timely manner along all permit boundaries and waterways and
wetlands if a lesser buffer exists.
10. A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shall be consistent with the approved reclamation plan.

Page 5
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971 generated
on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be disposed of in a
designated refuse area. All other waste products must be disposed of in a
disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste Management. No petroleum
products, acids, solvents or their storage containers or any other material that
may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5, steel reinforced air hoses
6. drill steel
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit boundary,
the following information must be provided to and approved by the Division of
Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal:
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2. a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and,
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established.
E. No off -site generated land clearing and inert debris shall be allowed within the
90.7-acre permit area without having first obtained a modification from the Land
Quality Section to allow such activities.
11. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
12. A. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify
or otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment
control plan contained in the approved application for a mining permit or any
approved revision to it. Approval to implement such changes must be obtained
from the Department prior to on -site implementation of the revisions.
B. No off -site generated land clearing and inert debris shall be allowed within the
90.7-acre permit area without having first obtained a modification from the Land
Quality Section to allow such activities.

Page 6
13. The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a $28,900.00
Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in
the approved application. This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid.
The total affected land shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
14. A. Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant archaeological
resources.
B. Pursuant to N. C. G. S. 70 Article 3, `The Unmarked Human Burial and Human
Skeletal Remains Protection Act," should the operator or any person in his
employ encounter human skeletal remains, immediate notification shall be
provided to the county medical examiner and the chief archaeologist, North
Carolina Division of Archives and History.

Page 7
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By G.S. 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious, odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shall to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to restore the mine excavation to a lake area and to grade and revegetate the
adjacent disturbed areas.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:
A. The lake area shall be excavated to maintain a minimum water depth of four feet
measured from the low water table elevation.

Page 8
B. The side slopes to the lake excavation shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter to the water line and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below the
water line.
C. Any areas used for wastepiles, screening, stockpiling -or other processing shall
be leveled and smoothed.
D. No contaminants shall be permanently disposed of at the mine site. On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Condition Nos. 10A
through 10E.
E. The affected land shall be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Revegetation Plan:
After site preparation, all disturbed land areas shall be revegetated as per the following:
Permanent Seeding Specifications
Dates
Species
Rate, Lbs/Acre
February 15 - April 1
Kobe Lespedeza
10
Bahiagrass
50
Redtop
1
Winter rye (grain)
15
April 1 - July 31
Common Bermuda
50
August 1 - October 25
Lespedeza (unscarified)
30
German millet
40
October 25 - February 15
Rye (grain -temporary)
120
Soil Amendments
Lime: 2000 Ibslacre or follow recommendations from a soil test
Fertilizer: 1000 Ibslacre 8-8-8 or 10-10-10, or follow recommendations from a soil
test.
Mulch: All seeded areas shall be mulched using small grain straw at a rate of
2000 Ibslacre and anchored appropriately.
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.

Page 9
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.G.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan:
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
This permit, issued to Larry W. Styron December 13, 1995, modified November 19,
1996, January 18, 2001, and October 18, 2001 and renewed December 16, 2005, is
hereby transferred in its entirety to William F. Parker this 3`" day of October, 2011
pursuant to G.S. 74-51.
Of the
On
Jafnes D. Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources

' t^x T .'X.' ry ;,•i^' L: '.7tz ,rys7, 3 u,K r• .,y :7 ti` - -j .�- �i4 a •,v,,.:i, ..�. � ro3 a:k•"... -.. �Y- lu' +�'�`.•.-"� �
�s l ^ t. a -i r .i' ` rC�� !'" ry e4.:.i.L� t o,a" I rhy..'J r.- 'j� N .�?;r✓�rl'r4.;7 fi f, �_ r�-�t .r,
�e��' 4 �,f' t •' i'�h;Jf a. •Ir -V - u �-_ Sr r�4�rc. f� �Rar.. -tir' �Jr r- h J", �f'F i�' e.. •s• _ %A�' •r ttr'�- '-si1 y' ''r;. ;y.cfr�h S�f� f -
:-+>`�: y % i P • 1 a:l%-� r, s, �; rrcrTz-sT 4ssi' 'u, 3 +s1_.. r�i � ;.-3 ��- i�Jc�y,Y .7w �'��k-`,•„` _,:.��J �?'Y� ,:
,r cw .st .i �! 1:,� , r ;t ..� r � �9�1 't���i�t 4r F t:+! � �d Ef r � s;r .�' ;� rh+4',4 ��. r✓ r•"'_ s+at__
'+C�`.'ri''Sf i',' ^-�Cf4�' ...,-may Lft ;ti"; �.� :;-.,+ v ,tk�, `,..r.+ ; i'r•Es ., .#.r ;ice ,�Y,,.c3 a'(7 '.�iR"+istP .•^„wi ;ir�� il�y 3,. ems,' Si
•yif '• r., = '4_ v`'7=� /'" c k' h J",r? iS Y'" +ci• ., r yi�Fx. c
.rr' v'•' c
�=_, a y '�"Yt //°{r�.,•:��>•� st°;.;� r %�.��.rr r � I„r�,+ 1� r`a tr-: r +�i�rc„ I ���; �(',sv. �* � � -oil � rx�` yr,•. /�)• �'i !•qs e. •I '/. _r•,,, 'ir e'i�,•�'r5'kv i- T+F}' s, a he y r - ,r +`_,Ls 4_1 wa i :,.'T wr
\�t r '� � `' �.. dr, � r�F'L.�a� � � ,,, .. ��y�.� -� . mc'9, � .r;,,Y�r" �-'�"i' 'b � x '� .=, 2 J+ •C +'�,�t',"�.si
t 1 F+a Y to �7• u c a t f 11 rt, `t ` ii� G r a/ ;1r. k t. }'
�•_ f+ S-15.����y� :. e r ''s :see- �`ts �. �. �,cy� +°t' .�' yj. �.��X' l'�i. k %'r z"• ti .e..r �-1.�Y•f'L'-•t".15 � '•lYa�j
r ,s. -!2" !.2 � o-'.;�. ';->'s•4. J 4,.. _ -3•.. �* s a.- •it . {r r�"-, .r ! � t.. r ;5;. h
rl ..�o-•L yrf/ .J'4d> i 10 ! ..1, .. �bry; "'1.• •' ;"'1}'„ 0,7 �'il �frk ii rr -t'tic� > r� _f ���--.. r�r''i .���-�".,:i �:l+%! + S1. k•.�i
I !, l J1 Y1'u'•°{ 1". "k,'.•• .r +•i<'s.+ �: t••y ram•...; ra'J i'"Y`I� t� :� n7" •sf.,~ra•Y. ' :�. /.. 1,"r y1i.r-. t 7lLYr v � •` ,/ ::J?I t¢ ti ca .s:4..e syi-. �.. ;� �� '' Y%.� c ,k a�- t � min x'-li..
_ �n # } rc r i- 5•r , c `w �. ��!: 'l �'. 'I'�t,9t•. i ti �.'�. �"�-
-9r"`J .r-•,v'Ih ''�7.�� �� t� -t�n �v yJ� f�,e,.s. J� `';<r•' '�'1i: �. - fl 3.' � •af- �r
..ai.• ?' {S`6 L� 42 w ice, _ a J?a( „r, r �-f=r v rwp..1¢� .z,?+ ,;. t iFa. •. � ,, ,�
$ vii '.4 �t�; *,i 'E,{F,SI. 4, .;.. ate. ET•-'F�,L'7: i_;r �,�'a.': rle�.S'�c `t•,'�
/ rf�Lf ♦ �s 0wt- . .!''•} I' r�4 -n':� ai,4 .e �?v�"x :r, ....ram
�it.'�,t ,�'°� \ f � r4 t'S 1 ^� A,��Y` :a't�`+, '.der t�_ �: �.'�,, '.•�- l t+l � ,i Si 1. ^ram ~� � i-�; 7r. a'Y'
a'•' ,,
plr j - a i, ,i }•y•7-
�.i�'y • Fi!', •,.Y �Vr �M "rL']- 'IJ�gr-! .iL J / r {�r Y,.]i';.J/Gy
{s+�ti'E nN" •al :}. }.; r t s' n3' I! c Z ��k"?"',}i� I�'
r1-.�4 +s. as.-r.-LJi��fi�.�r�'Rl.i• �.. iy,: >1.�:y;y h•r=.,'.<hi....f.rah{i ..t e .,. e �1 �e '1
>>, .� ti ..6 u <' �,'•�..t• f f Jr�} r;Yv\ • r .. �, -:.� S { ` _ t r hr } r r r •yt [ f�
r.� � �.r a �' ��t�r�,r.;•t �.) x ' y "z'!"J` r�r:� •.� -�r�Y t�r'�:1hi7�} ° �\ ��,sX.tF}�`�Fn?'�' ;-. •xR i' w + s1' �'�t� - ._ iti., '.,- r �r rs' £?.•.
.,ter'_ ���-,� ti.r �, ".� >ss4 y�lt s'a�' 4 `fsa ��•f 5�`' ��.+2s v Fnv� L r Y . dr,, Ist .� Jr[ Z.s � "� s x ~ ;
ii( � qq f � .� f � 3 �'�� ! .�••9t7 fir- � � ��
.r. �'.',^ c#{Jy^�•. 4v �. t y�JYj ••+- +�'r�! ��'�+'<I '1 r 0..�yf� J t. � 3 a. AY �r � � �js!-we,,,,f�'�w�_ }"':'y s v f �� ��Atr�';l+F y-1'RY�ti •
} S' 5• r z, i s r • t i._.r... :'. gyry. �r s. „x,-y ar•
't{s �> fi s {��g' "'+, t. �...-: !°"�a'k, A.ti';i.,: .:?if.�i'zae`+- •'�t`' 13K-
L
S.. i C r • 7'iisPLi IC eA
$.: c L. ry,.i ss't [ r'f3w"r•Jn •'.4 r�fi. t' , 5 1 �F^d i rr `•' - .H � µ y�c'`� r r
\.ti,,� •� 4 •[ - �b r �•,-M;.' air. 15 rr rti.Ji frr4 i t,. ro ra+ ti1.r t - es, �{ i'(F•'.
r r a 1
:1`1Sr ;N tj .` ff. 6 Y �•' 'i; i�lk'�'� .
`4_' e �Y�''inrt k• i s . '- ..�L�H k : l a d+ t �,. rJ' Itsa,- ter" �� i �;,s•?"4 ! "i+%' K`"� „�:
�If
.P
t X i Cam, - ti .,lt rcv t• r r ,
t�itY �.
I r". P 4' wyJJ -+4 r r, :r1 i. E � � a� ter r � '� `µ, � �.+_ ' J�r,�S• ; '' h�' };`4 y ,� ,.rllr ': ry.� I �V ? aT4 i`� ic'.
I F l �.'r1 .�> .�,. '" 4J r-� ,t, M^�0.ri {r I !"' I k4.h .. '+a..•. t
L r 11��1 ti..'v14y ''kF M.s�u• r� '� s � e� ['t - `ItXg S' ' i �. ,Ft A �1'4 r I'. { 4 ' ' i ii" f } r t .'�S ,'. I , -fk II lr �.�•
J • _,: f'.tfi1"i I ,.i S r� [ +' In -Y f E': j.i- ; {wr •di- r+uj ti _ tiJ.
_' l 1 I •K. c •,� s f � "`r` - s_:_-.-:�=�..--r � ° 11NY� �`��n. xr
.: r ',r^'trr•~ - I+ b J// ,'d _'r''r': f r+a• - a ,{ k^" s 'Q• w.
- �..�� rl td 4, r -i3'J,y t •ems vr. -t :-d+ sc
g .i,,, •t �✓' L '14 r,,. r - 4 ,.. y tV:.•'2JrI•
•e�ci+w. _, ? s r y.:' -e Ix 1{ r,•� + Mr �,xr�"i rtrJM N• I_ '-* S . p f _ v .�v'{h:�i nr. i l'.\�'•` ate+.
..ti Jr'�1�� 5
4 � _ � �;ti -s ti :�� �Y� �tirt`" Y .",. , }"•ii "��'� �,� F �+� S � :is, c � .t, .•. FS`"r, . � ;' 1,. � w
+••�'.,�,� ,e 1ZVY�,�r.�G" .'tir 1`x �,� ?vf-;t ;�;;=�=='_� �r'�'„fr1�i' '+isi"e„•+rtit�yxs .,I;c4e,-s �:�:r�",• ..krtY�;••' �,r'-r� r',��',..*t �Fti`1',�""r�
{. tl;� .Gy'.p'rr, '�;Y,°'tj,, w .�. is xr• '1+Str .., ['�` n^a �� 'k�.� ,° kiui'- v �� 4 r ±� .... ._.. � .. � v cC },ha y�• �,_ -
~-:.Circle_P_-Farm Styron_P.it
: •': re F L' � Fl ' 't i ,y '• : S �j � s�, r 4 „w ���•.' - y i rla"
°• - _ t' '°a:J }.F�r'ri w..] ,moo fs tiey� ,. �` a 'H SJ JrI s,•� .� k j^l, : ' r r. •- u-.r�e�ts1 r L.�a* S•.SC t^�
r':,t r•J.S +tS'Ss}✓-f x t„ -,ter"y. rl _at !'r _ •,/...-=:.�':.•�!1ir �a. y,; .;}%;�,.5 si[,,r. •y
r,
Kr• .. JS T�li`'{y�'yM,.l•+ r>,i l �i'-� 'II,,, '4 { j �� S i '{t 1 'y�
T.A.
[.�`r r t' a r J•.E. �,.. - �� � C. ,. F � � ; rZl � �V _ �+ �r .rrls•, W
fps'{{iiJJ "r• •i.Fl ;' ii ' .r ;t�i --� i .r 3`C.� f" +f ^' • '•4 y h. • • F'
r•�t .� ,'4,,. ,.+ l.' i 7 \`v'{3t"t� xi��t f� ti y {N' {, �•i'a.`- !"'. �'• „ t '�'- ! - { 1'�'Li:i'
s 4 � ..' ti F. nlK� ` 4• - +. ' I .� ! +. � _ rr u J Y•-2;� *�'_,} (J r ,+�i" ✓r �'"'� :J
-'>z ' Sri. r J•t t r ie - �� M L ri.X- �'•�l,s �-� •, {'• :E. �*• `o- rY••�J. �. �, _ -x ti � •.,L .� 1 I ' > 1 Sli.,'t � y. t� -,1. +rL�7.\'h+''�'Y.r•.' •'r
�>w a . „ � � ;i; � �A r err • w; , c' a :✓.: +%�;J:r ,.;, v'S't rc {{ - 1. k w 'r 'x ,s ,V" + Ilr + 'I' . r' - . •,r.«.'•,',,:�r.
=z �AALI
�� � ':.>li �; ,�w....ti �• ���' 'f''*'' �ag ���+�Y,�.w� r?b_ �- I � •'� ''1 � '�'��.. ; �';Jr b? +•...�n �1'.� ,`ii'�� �n 4s�
x H tw r 3
7RF
� :tti+ +�.,�-9' rt �oi{�i �rr�M/ 1 �Yt{�t���; � ;� r�h � -r Lr •r. � }��r7 � K�' „�'.�F '�I �'x .�+
+:'r, �=;. _ s4, x.`.,. ••O '.d" 3:'=:'.w+ Stg-,/"r.ir ���'." .i{s.'YU C•��,�i,,J ,rf./f . �f 4I,2.•.. ` L � Jri-Rim:
_'!" n a h �•
'� Tn d �K, ''rv�1•r=i:'h�r '. ,� z•� i�vdS rid � x3 _ rti , f dL 4 fix �cfy� } r,'fi�b'^' �'' �--�•-'y � ;� �J'�:
>•-,-.L .-7 F- :r � .�, �'� �ti�5 �f/f' rr -• a_-``ai�'_� 'cYy-r_r>✓! �i� ���r`;�kcr ,��r\'�:i �f.-�s'' 1v5` r>"i�
ni;- r ,.i.✓ ;` a .; JJr<a� ;r�! � �•�.-_ A` .i •u,:j�:w r �:
l , aG .yr"1i f1F?' }ryt t kXf'1: + !r r a /, 1 tiia` 73{rrr rY{I x f 4- -}� ia4 ,•..',Y
rr +t � �y� 13 t' i• 1� - :w?C Kr'r.�'S Y",H �"'r�
i!s�.+F•`.'^•"}�•�,ti r�: Yj - r�.ya,� ! "14})
,�..f''„y ��„ � ' �,��14`1�.{� ^C�� ,� lgxe si�i:�.{Fc-;t'� x n`."� t r ,��� �°/�t,f y �• •r,#�•� s f�5�
r%� "%!. i �i f�i"-,rY 1;" �y; �11; Jr-flw .`��, {`,lyye� f{�'� ''S,•:S'fi..,i'. �. f. ..� ��iF .S�tS': ;_4 L��.�.1j�1(j.�t,: 1F�,L •,�•J :Nli �f ,y�",';
fifllyis �,r�� S.es-` 'i��+s' ! r ; ._l`•'.'.` a'Y t ;ra a'G ,',.I}�r -� -.7 y,!_ _
��arLr-.�,. t3
i.r r it +�'
wrsr. > � t a� � � � ' 0 7r+ ��l Y r Ya��.,`7 _ 4� `� •-c u.
� f _ ��_� ��YF�+�'-"(,•- "a F�'+ 4� r. Si � �.. � [���*eilt'}i1.i:'�'4���Yt's'`� � rnn yf..Cgri« 't y� � Y f 1�� � `:'-�h�{',,�jjp (�--•� ff �j�,�i'Je9 .,�'�3! { "'r
} - .. 1. % ak >.. f• •~� h nib :A• ''4,C 'S, 'tFc,E!" !i : rl - fl7'.- 3"'' S }•b"' f ll, r'� �W�,f"
:r,:,f"a�"' ,vim t26'��' .�.a. � r `F!' �8,• w :+•d3, B'I i
y���jl
i�
� �.. r r „,� �,� C . L .� _....., � dl+: ;, � u j _ �+ � � .� nax�C�+�•yr`.e- - : 1 +r a+ �•r'+ ti
r � i t rx. n `'r`§rvc' ."Y:.�,y.; r���C' r� �. -s �. J h }•
� e
r Jt� w sJ•'
a I �.r. c,• ., � - -. -s. ���,/r/� }'�"y�,lL. ,��Cf�r�3-iS Imo'^�`rsr^ v�Y x:r. � � tY:r t f �Y.� , t �_'}�r . r
y�.� .- t r Yi'•.fiiy^ 4 1 � - f J ' � _ � �l N-'e• 1 �tiw Ji•�� l � vti4' ..r Yif -
.t' w +.a •',i� '� ''+'y`K•J. 4u� lr At-
+ �~' I� 1.11 . -sh ��� i_ a •YyYz". �._�;' � i ��j�sL't� � w.�bj+t'i^}`•r` > ' !{ � t ; 1 1:
.il-�:� �' 's��� ��* �+ �I•.•��� 1r�"r+�y�.J.Y`+�-�''t�4'+�'sj�'i'iy'y �����..-.� ��>r�, � c � _?�p r f � r '
�� • lil 'I �, ;rF`Pq;'� +"PF�il,7•wr'�R� r � Ir--fi'�lU�p� {��N •s�'f ff?�j + A t 'r' 4 �s a � , ^r l^
': r'I+'/ :. * �. C ■ _ I,.ti,} a rr i yl. I i� ��� s J, rill.'_ � - ?t t - - x
I ff lJ__ ,_ �s.��,2�i �j� >4' �; I �'� rr-�� }Y,�gxtic' 'i�� �- t1•. k. �°r;,i� r :'+> 4. I rFl � � s,� i-
'.J:1/.t.5 ���11 Ft� -� I!' , �.a r�i.>,Csr f7f'�''•{i�ll'� a. � K,wt.:y� t_ •s ,c: s 'L: 1 •2e_ >
NCG020813
N
W E
S
Map Scale 1:19,083
W.F. Parker
Circle P Farms - Styron Pit
Newport, NC
Latitude: 34144' 45" N
Longitude: 761 54' 29" W
County: Carteret
Receiving Stream: UT to Gale's Creek
Stream Class: SA, HQW, PNA
Sub -basin: 03-05-03 (White Oak River Basin) Facility Location

e
___---__—_� _
f f
CROA TAN YI I
NATIONAL 1
ie.ORR FSrr �4tOlLRT 5
CROATAN
NATIONAL
s rasR. asno
N I C
f
Rw.lss[
LIU
.Sl vwo
I�T y ail �Il
I `
I
I � i
OI.VY
I m
Tp
—£m ld tsar RAIN
pO • S Y O
r' sotiva �
f ' e rm.. w.r rn � cn.>•.•+:•u wwwr.�.r• w,
CPE
OOA[ 01 I
• •. �. • • .r.[A . wwu 1 .•..... rw r.rw .r r.r.a V A i 10
E
Srk A S H O R E
..Her rr.
NO
L�CG�\P
ri.. L r;L n..My•K.rw�
+ rR R[„rv.ao
14 J�� I [rwrmnwc,:w
I � Yw.wrwa.w nry rr.
• � n-L uv.rc.r.s..,
I ®wc r�rauy wr rr mn
® Ynn.Lwri..ra.wtk'i[lY[[}
ISLAND
NA TILYINL wrLfX.LFE _
�Ef --�•- [,,�":
...
m vve .rrces DAa •-'Y- �.w..n R�ww.
T5� o f�
Atlantic
AiWt
field
.War • f �Mn.. �, d.s.r.a...a,,.„
o .. ..- .. ... r.....�-..
N
r<r Al rr�
S 4T
µlc r" acr
CARTERET COUNTY
NORTH CAROUNA
\ORT}i CAROLI I A OEPA RTC ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE MIAD MAL`.TEII IvCE L XTT . %,L%ffVZ('. SECTION
U. S. DFpART�iL.� T OF TR[\\<pMATION
FMFRAL HIGM4 AY ADMIN STRATIO\
.'.0 ns..0.w.JMrM
r�Iltw.An...a.-rw reti<tr,[.�.. [.. [r.r. n •.. n.wvv....r...r
.•rT.
[...r.r [wlsyy tarn:

February 10, 2012:
I spoke with Ann Deaton in Marine Fisheries. She checked on Gales Creek up to the headwaters to
verify its PNA designation. The regulation states "North of the Highway 24 Bridge".
15A NCAC 311 .0103 12(a) is where the description of the PNAs are listed in Rule.
Gales Creek is also classified as SA, HQW. See additional information for the DWQ classification in the
file.
Jennifer Jones

2/10/12 ncrules.state.nc.uslncacltitle 15a - environment and natural resources/chap...
to a point 34' 45.5720' N - 760 34.6236, W; and
(ii) Turner Creek (Gibbs Creek) - west ofa line beginning on the north shore at a point 34"
43.4693' N - 760 37.6372' W; running southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 43.4054' N -
76° 37.6585' W; and
(C) Newport River - west of a luie beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 46.5635' N - 76' 44.3998'
W; running southerly to Lawton Point to a point 34' 45.6840' N - 76' 44.0895' W;
(i) Russel Creek - northeast of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 340 45.5840' N -
76° 39.8020' W; running southeasterly to the south shore to a point 34' 45.5819' N - 76'
39.7895' W ;
(ii) Ware Creek - northeast ofa line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 46.4576' N - 76'
40.5020' W; running southcastcrly to the south shore to a point 34' 46,4125' N - 76' 40.4460'
W;
(iii) Bell Creek - east of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 47.2805' N - 76'
40.9082' W; running southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 47,0581' N - 76' 40.8854' W;
(iv) Eastrnan Creek - cast of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 47.864t1' N - 76'
41.0671' W; running southerly to the south shore to a point 341147.8027' N - 76 41.0605' W;
(v) Oyster Creek - north ofa line beginning on the west shore at a point 34' 46.6610' N - 76'
42.501 I'W: running easterly to the east shore to a point 34' 46.7161' N - 76' 42.3481' W;
(vi) Harlow Creek - north of a line beginning on the west shore at a point 34" 46.7138' N - 76'
43.4838' W; running northeasterly to the cast shore to a point 34' 46,8490' N - 76' 43.3296'
W;
(vii) Calico Creek- west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 43,7318' N - 70'
43.1268' W; running southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 43.6066 N - 76' 43.2040' W;
and
vuu) Crab Point Bay - northwest of a line beginning on the northeast shore at a point 34'
5A- N L A-(, oI 44.0615' N - 76" 42.9393' W; running southwesterly to the southwest shore to a point 34'
43.9329' N - 760 43.0721' W ;
(12) Bogue Sound - Bogue Inlet Arm
(a) talcs Creek - north of the Highway 24 Bridge;
(b) Broad Creek - north ofthe Highway 24Bridge;
(c) Sanders Creek - north of a line beginning at a point 3411 42.4694' N - 76' 58.3754' W on the west
shore; running easterly to a point 34' 42.4903' N - 760 58.1434' W on the cast shore;
(d) Goose Creek - north of a line beginning on the west shore at a point 34' 41.8183' N - 77' 00.7208' W;
running easterly to the east shore to a point 34' 41.8600' N - 77' 00.5108' W;
(e) Archer Creek - west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 40.4721' N - 77' 00.7577' W;
running southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 40.3521' N - 77' 00.8(W' W;
{fj White Oak River- northwest of a line beginning on the northeast shore at a point 34' 45.6730' N -
77° 07.5960' W; running southwesterly to the southwest shore to a point 34' 45.2890' N - 77' 07.7500'
W;
(1) Pettiford Creek - cast ofa line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 42.8670' N - 77'
05.3990' W; running southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 42,63 W N - 77' 05.3180' W;
and
(ii) Holland Mill Creek - west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 341, 43.8390' N -
77° 08.0090' W; nunning southeasterly to the south shore to a point 34' 43,4800' N - 77'
07.7650' W;
(g) Hawkins Creek - west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 41.1210' N - 77' 07.5720'
W; nrnning southerly to the south shore to a point 34' 41.0460' N - 77' 07.5930' W;
(h) Queen's Creek - north of state road number 1509 bridge:
(i) Dick's Creek - west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 39,9790' N - 77'
09.3470' W; running southeasterly to the south shore to a point 34' 39.9350' N - 77' 09,3280'
W;
(ii) Parrot Swamp - west of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34" 40.6170' N - 77'
09.7820' W; running southeasterly to the south shore to a point 34' 40.3660' N - 77' 09.5980'
W; and
(iii) Hall's Creek - cast of a line beginning on the north shore at a point 34' 41.0740' N - 77'
09,8640' W; running easterly to the south shore to a point 34041.0300' N - 77" 09.6740' W;
and
ncrules.state.nc.uslncacl... 115a ncac 03r.0103.html 12117

Foster Creek 20-35 5C 06/01/56
From source to White Oak River _ L
Freeman Creek
19-41-5
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Intracoastal Waterway
I f
1
Freemans Creek
20-16
C
06/01/56
From source to White Oak River
Frenchs Creek
19-24
SC;NSW
08/01/91
From source to New River
Fulcher Creek
21-35-1-6
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to North River
Fulchers Creek
21-35-7-12
SA;ORW
01/01/90
From source to Core Sound
Fullard Creek (Salt Branch)
19-39-4-1
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Chadwick Bay
Gable Creek
21-28
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Newport River
Gales Creek
20-36-8
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Bogue Sound
7
l
Ghouls Fork
21-16-1-1
C
06/01/56
From source to Main Prong
Gibbs Creek
21-35-1-10
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to North River
Gibson Branch
20-6.5
C
06/01/56
From source to White Oak River
Gillets Creek
19-41-4
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Intracoastal Waterway
Gilliklin Creek
21-35-1-7-1
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Ward Creek
Glover Creek
21-35-7-3-1
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to Styron Bay
Godfry Branch
20-24
SA;HQW
06/01/56
From source to White Oak River
Thursday, February 09, 2012 Based on Classifications as of 20120208 Page 8 of 24

NCG020813
N
S
Map Scale 1:19,083
:V
-.1, IV
I
A
NJ
Cal
Circle P Farm - Styron Pit
4 e
A
4 is
t 4
7
7
A:
�.4
W.F.Parker
Circle P Farms - Styron Pit
Newport, NC
Latitude: 341 44' 45" N
Longitude: 761 54' 29" W
County: Carteret
Receiving Stream: UT to Gale's Creek
Stream Class: SA, HQW, PNA
Sub -basin: 03-05-03 (White Oak River Basin)
Facility Location

Bmad Creek
Prl�1n ; Pettifl]rd Creek
Sanders Creek r
0103 12 c -S
y 3Ot)89 Creek (`
I.0103 12 d
Vly- f-
F `
� A Nam
C14tARY MiN7 ASalftF
Path
U S MUTAAY RESMA110N point
} end T4MLAL" - r
M°" �009u
e
p"N+'. " tndi*n
Lfs
.010312 a Archer Creek
!k
i
I
I
334
334 i
' � l
� I I
1�\ r
\� r
I
378 4
I
336
35
i
This map was produced by the Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
program. Infonrlational data used to create this map were collected from
federal, state, county, and private organizations This map is a general
guide to assist the public and is for illustrative purposes only While every
effort is made to keep this map accurate and up-to-date, it is not intended
to replace any official source Under no circumstances shall the State of
North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omissions made from
reliance on any infomlation contained herein from whatever source nor
shall the Slob be kible for any other consequences from enp such rtl Ante.
Background imagery are U S Geologicak F,ahery Nursery Areas Fishery Nursery Areas
Survey 1-.100,000-scale planimenic maps- Primary
Q Permanent Secondary
© Special Secondary
© Military Danger
Zones and
Restricted Areas
lO or map
Intend waters (WRC Nrmd,Clan{ Map 21
Map Datum NAD83
Map Projection NC State Plane
Map Date. March 2011
10aa 0 10W M Yards
0.7 0 0.7 1 4 Miles

. . . . . ......... .... ..
-37
Al--LI
4-
rce,"v
,.,

discharges. (Should non-stormwater discharges be discovered the
p ittee shall contact this office as soon as possible but in no case
greate than 24 hours or the next business day).
■ Inspectio , s of the acility and all stormwater systems shall occur as
part of the R ev tative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program
at a minima n a semi-annual schedule.
• This office must be notifie in\writing at least 30 days prior to commencing any
industrial activity on the site, even if,updates or changes are temporary.
• A copy of this letter must be maintained with the facility permit and associated plans and
records for the life of/the permit.
Should you have any questiAs, please contact XXXXX XXXXXX at (XXX) XXX-XXXX.
Sincerely,
XXXX XXXXXXXX
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
XXXXXXX Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
cc: XXXXX Regional Office Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
DWQ Central Files
NPS ACO Unit Files

/UC�f }UJC�C� li,
dv
•ye
A Cr�n-,T Cv c) /ki C( ) /I if'*� r,s s q )pok—
OPL WOsec.U.co ,
p

Circle P Farm — Styron Pit
Permit No. 16-21
e
Meeting on February 7, 2012
Archdale Building
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC
William F. Parker, P.E.
252-241-0376
[e-mail]
A

0
Date:
Friday, February 3, 2012 4:21 PM
From:
[e-mail]
To:
cyndi,[e-mail]
Subject:
Mining Permit No. 16-21
•
Ms. Karoly,
T look forward to meeting with your staff on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012 in you
conference room at the Archdale Building.
Thank you for returning my call and 3. am forward the last few emails for you to
review.
Respectfully,
W.E. Parkerr P.E.
. ..jTji yil .,. ... .r... ......� ...�. w-:. I .............. ..... .r I ........�.. p', vj 1 ......::y . ,.. «� � a.yr,. i:�: :......n... .,.... wn
1 a�..!!.. 3 1U 1 T! ram! p.11—Q �++1►/r ;lDET T11fr1?A7 ➢.I— iiC� 1!7!`1{1i'?
i ILll /./ r"Chl. L ai L CC. 11. CO —I fUG/Il1tU i1 111irS1L11.'.`7471�YIL�ly:lll7V [l[�'tilC[IiSYIu,Ics�,.,.1Juv11

Page 2 of')
Date: Friday, February 3, 2012 12:42 PM
From: [e-mail]
To: Jones, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
Cc: Rodgers, Ashley <[e-mail]>, Wehner, Judy <[e-mail]>, Willis; Linda
<[e-mail]>, Bennett, Bradley <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: NCG020813 additional information request
Jennifer,
Thank you for your request for clarification.
I have NO INTENT to dewater the Circle P Farm(16-72) to the Styron Pit(16-21)
and then discharge to surface waters. I DO NOT understand where that is coming
from.
Yes, I talked to DLR(Ms. Ashley Rogers f, Ms. Judy Wehner) in Oct. 2011 when I
was transferring the Styron pit(16-21) over if they wanted me to combine and
they said to keep it separate because Circle P FARM PIT(16-72) was not complete
and approved. They advised it might be feasible down the road.
Circle P Farm Permit(16-72) has nothing to do with the issue at hand —that
permit is designed, approved, bonded, received and is acceptable to me and all
approving agencies. I am wanting to continue the Styron Permit(16-21) which has {���
been approved and bonded and transferred to me in Oct. 2011, told by Linda iffwls` 1N+
I would be grandtathered on two o ssions ;that--Ul-S-�1d be allowed to discharge
just as Mr. Styron has done for FIFTEEN YEAS PLJ
. Now, after the Oct. 2011 transfer without any othernotification otification by any State
Branch, I am being ask to sample discharge, apply for a new dicharge with you
and now you advise that I may have to apply for another new State Stormwater
Permit that, was begun in 2008. Why was Mr. Styron not requested to do water
sampling for DW4, apply for a discharge permit with you division and get the
2008 Stormwater permit? when will this end and how many more "after the fact"
permits must I get?
My frustrations are continuing to build with this confusion on the end of the
State?
Respectfully,
WF Parker
0

Page 1 of 2
. Date- Friday, February 3, 201211:40 AM
From: Jones, Jennifer <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Bennett, Bradley <[e-mail]>, Willis, Linda <[e-mail]>, Wehner, Judy .
Cc: <[e-mail]>, Rodgers, Ashley <[e-mail]>, Jones, Jennifer
<[e-mail]>
Subject: NCG020813 additional information request
Dear Mr. Parker,
I have spoken to Bradley and he said that you'd like our additional information request before you leave on vacation, so I
am including it below. I have copied Ashley Rodgers and Judy Wehner in the Division of Land Quality (DLR) so if there
are overlapping requests we can all be notified and in agreement.
Please provide the following information:
After speaking with staff in the Division of Land Resources, it is my understanding that they believe your intention is to
pump from the Circle P Pit (16-72) to the Styron Pit (16-21), and then discharge to surface waters from the Styron Pit.
After hearing back from Bradley, t am unclear if this is your intention. Please confirm your pumping and dewatering plan
and the water routing in writing.
DLR staff also indicated that you intend to combine the areas permitted under 16-72 and 16-21 into one DLR permit (so
that you can discharge from (the current) 16-72 area to 16-21 pit) but have not applied to as of yet. Please confirm your
plans to do this, and a time frame for when you expect this to happen. Please be aware that the issuance of an NPOES
permit is contingent upon the issuance of an associated mining permit from DLR. This contingency is a condition of our
NPDES general permit for mining. Our DWQ office will finalize the processing of your stormwater permit application once
a DLR mining permit has been issued for your project.
0 Under our understanding of your facility plans and water routing now, it appears that your will pump from 16-72 to 16-21,
and that you plan to combine the permits 16-72 and 16-21 into one DLR permitted area. If this is correct, DWQ requests
that you permit both of these areas Circle P (16-72) pit and Styron Pit (16-21) under one permit. Please confirm this, and if
the previous statements are true, please modify your application to include areas permitted under DLR permit 16-72.
In order to have a better understanding of your site we would also like to have a complete site plan for both the Circle P
mine (16-72) area, and the Styron Pit mine (16-21) area on one site map. Please provide us with one.
Please provide us with a copy of your Division of Land Resources Mining applications for both 16-72 and 16-21.
Also be aware that if your project is located near wetlands, your NPDES permit will require dewatering operations without
wetland impacts. The specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found in the text of the
general NPDES mining permit number NCG 020000 available on our website. An approved Operation and Monitoring
Plan is required for NPOES-permitted mining facilities and may be required prior to permit issuance. Discharging mine
dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement action. A Plan for your facility must be
submitted to the Washington Regional Office within 60 days of your receipt of an NPDES permit. We encourage you to
contact Linda Willis at the Wilmington Regional Office to address any wetland concerns for your facility in order to ensure a
successful NPDES application review.
Additionaily, new coastal stormwater management rules (SESSION LAW 2008-211) were implemented October 1, 2008.
Due to these rules you may be required to apply for a "State Stormwater" Permit. Please contact Kelly Johnson in the
Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7345 to determine if you will be required to submit an application for this additional
permit.
r�lease provide the above information by March 20, 2012 or your application may be returned as incomplete. If you cannot
rovide the above informatlon in that time frame, please send a notification to us in writing to request additional time.
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have further questions, I will be glad to help.
htto://webmail.ec.rr.eom/do/maii/me.gSane/nre.vie?w?rnc(Ylri=iNRflXr)PI.f11A1l157f1R,t=P._ric

Page 1 of, l
Date: Thursday, February 2, 2012 3:12`RM
From: Bennett, Bradley <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail],com <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Styron Pit No. 16-21
Thanks Mr. Parker,
We look forward to hearing from you later in the month. As a note on the N PDES
aopiication, Jennifer has a couple of questions that you may need to address ffor
Us. Do you grant us to go ahead and send those your way or Trait until you get
back?
BB
Bradley Bennett
Stormwater Permitting UniL
HC Division of Water Quality
1617 mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email:
Web: aU j�:1i;.r;.. n_..._:iu:,t ..._ .;1:•!y: i, tir`....
Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the Horth
Carolina Public Records maw and may be disclosed to third parties.

-----Original Message -----
From: :r`par _Ar3a,c. rr. �o, [:• ?p� ,':__�-:a.�. rr. o�:,l
Sent: Thursday,, February 02, 2012 11:13 AM
To: Bennett, Bradley
. Cc: Willis, Linda
Subject: Styron Pit No. 16-21
Mr'. Bennett,
I would like to postpone the Styron Pit dewatering issue until the last week of
this month. T have plans to be out of town and will be back around Feb. 23,
2012.
T appreciate you time this morning and look forward to meeting with Linda and
others to resolve this issue in a r,ray that works for all.
I will call Linda on Monday when she gets in the office and discuss a couple
thoughts we discussed today.
Respectfully,
w.F, Parker
i;opyTmhi 6 20 12 Rowc RLln - Ho!JCo. LLC I Advertise v:iln 03 1 i":ao Privacy Policy I Pr acy Polity I S1V Up iW Ra d Riy Or
4,e1�.-ll.....1-.......:1 ., :(�l'Ti�iaial�a;BilL1-11��SW� ius;.iiC-.t�IIII k�=ITT771�lrtrT•`ri-AAAI�AI/O:.k gal-v'_'0 • 'Ylr�l:-%)I
Cif
0

page 1 of J
L)
Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 9:29 PM
From: [e-mail]
To: Millis, Linda <[e-mail]>
Cc: bradley.bennett@ncdenr_gov
Subject: RE: Styron Pit
Thank you for the short and long of it —let me explain the rest of the story if
you will Linda,
When I met with you and Joann about a new permit for Circle P Farm in early
2011, I did discuss options of digging a borrow pit and the end result being a
duck impoundment with some shelves of less than two feet. Never did I imply the
entire borrow pit would only be two feet in depth... why would anyone go through
what I have for the last year(time and money) to do that? We all concluded that
discharging into the creek was not an option and I redirected my efforts in the
design of the new borrow pit discharging into an existing partially completed
pond on the Styron farm next to me. I have always stated that the new pit would
be approximately 15 feet in depth and that is what my application showed in May
2011- The new borrow pit is not adjacent to any creek or wetlands what so ever,
just like we discussed in the field with Joann. This permit O&M requires that I
maintain a 7.25ft. freeboard in the Styron receiving pond in order not to
overflow and allow for rain events. Your first paragraph talks about maintaining
the Stryon pit no lower than 7 ft., not draining the wetlands and Monitoring by
use of a overflow weir was not discussed and does not apply because this is a
closed loop system with no discharge —this pond will be receiving water not
discharging. My permit was apprcved(Permit No.16-72) along with the O&M plan and
there is no issue with this permit at all. I do not plan to start this borrow
pit for several years and I do not understand why you even brought it up.
Lastly, I was told to register my water withdraw with D➢iR and the withdraw rate
approved was 47,916 gpd which is the same as my permit with DLit.
After submitting my new pit application in May, 2011, I proceeded in purchasing
the Styron farm(90 acres) and closed on it in August, 2011. Part of the new
permit process was showing proof that I owned the Styron pond where I was
potentially discharging my wastewater and that it was in fact a closed loop
System,
Now to the issue at hand. Before I purchased the Styron farm and before I had
DLR transfer the original Styron borrow pit permit(16-21), I conferred with you
several times to make sure that I would be able to continue pumping just as
Styron had for 15f years and you said yes I would. Based upon that, I had DLR
transfer the permit effective Oct. 3,2011. I emailed you on Dec. 14, 2011, as
courtesy and ask if there was anything else I needed to do because I was ready
to begin dewatering the Styron pit in order to complete it. That is when you
told me to monitor the effluent and I would hear from Jennifer Jones about a
discharge permit. i did hire a lab to do the monitoring even though Mr. Styron
was never required to do so. Then Ms. Jones sends me 30-r pages of instructions
and a 9 page application for a NCG020000 for a National Pollutant Discharge
Permit. I applied for that permit on Jan. 24, 2012 and expressed my suprise &
concern to Ms. Jones, yourself and she shared them with Mr. Bennett. As stated
previously to all, if I was informed during the permit transfer or afterwards,
would have been able to work on versus finding out after the fact and after the
transfer.
In your Dec. 15, 2011 email response to me about other after the fact
requirements needed for the original Styron permit. You stated that the Styron
pit could only discharge 511 of the 7Q10 flow and you estimate based upon your
site visit last.Summer the creek had a flow of 40,000gpd leaving the Styyon pit
to discharge 20,000gpd. I did contact. Mr. Weaver of USGS amd ask for his opinion
based on USGS info for this site and he responded there was no data avallallle.
To comply with this requirement of 20,000gpd or 13.889pm it will tak, 613 day
L..-., RA 'ttl+7 i' 1'ILA-1'71} 0 r--.---.: __..��.... 1'd-.,w __a'1 J-
1- 4I ti+
J.1tti?.!r 1l4itlll[ill,% il.coilt'tlt.t;illciill1111�3ci Vl '1L. 3 tit i111?�yllt—J111S1' 11�= 1,14,11 r_3.:,Cv-i-11-4_t 5..,
'111 01irll"
41114V 14
110

Page 2 of")
to dewater the 2.5 acre borrow pit 15ft deep not allowing for Lain or
groundwater infiltration. I sent you a picture of 1/6 hp basement pump that
produces 12.00 gpm through a 3/4 garden hose. 1 know the 0&'M is to protect the
wetland and shellfish 2 miles away, lout this is not reasonable. I agreed Monday
to voluntarily do monthly water sampling for the first month even though it is
only required quartley and then adjust .from there in order to protect the
environment from discharge, but 1 need the ability to pump at a higher rate in
order to develope the existing Styron pit.
Mr. Styron has been pumping for many years using a 12" vertical turbine �S
discharging at a fiery hi e, no water quality,moni.torsr. and no discharge
permit. I a no pan to use that type pump and I wi be willing to be
reasonable on the discharge rate and do required monitoring, but 20,000gpd will
not work.
am forward our correspondence to Mr. Bennett because you said you would out
_._ti1 74:onday and he is going to call me in the morning. I felt like he needs to
:ro:•, both sides.
Respectfully,
41_E. Parker
•
0

Page I of 2
® Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:15 PM
From: Willis, Linda <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Styron Pit
Here's the short and long of it Mr. Parker,
The resources the 0 & M are to ensure protections for are:
1. Wetlands and
2. SA Shellfishing waters
I brought Jo with me on our site visit to ensure that there were no wetlands in
close proximity to your new proposed mine "Circle P" that we would be concerned
about protecting due to your dewatering. If you will recall, you indicated you
were mining to create a wetland for a waterfowl impoundment and would not need
to dig very deep. So let me ask you at this point, how deep did you indicate
you would excavate on your permit from DLR? We weren't expecting anything
deeper than a couple feet. Is this still the case? If it is greater than 20
feet deep, we may have a concern for wetlands or the creek that is located
adjacent to this pit. You also indicated to protect wetlands around the Styron
Pit (because there are wetlands within close proximity) that you would maintain
a certain water level in the Styron Pit at all times to protect the nearby
wetlands from draining (which would work) and that you could control the level
using the elevation of the overflow weir from that pit. All that must be
spelled out in writing in your O & M. I would think maintaining the level of
water in the Styron pit no lower than 7 feet from the surface would protect
wetlands in the nearby vicinity, but I'll have Jo confirm. If you decide to dig
® deeper say over 20 feet in the Circle P pit, we may need you to put in
monitoring wells in wetlands near that pit.
Now, concerning SA shellfishing waters. .
You specified a discharge of 20000 gallons per day. Please indicate in detail
how you will ensure this to be so and define how you will monitor that daily and
document it. The submersible pump is better sized and appears to be the way to
go, your calculations look good. You need to specify how you will insure the
quality of the discharge will meet the permit limits for SA waters. Since you
will pump to the Styron Pit, indicate where on the map you will introduce that
discharge (and logically it needs to be introduced the farthest point from the
outlet from the pit so you have adequate settling time). Revise your 0 & M for
monthly monitoring and state that if the fecal counts are below 14 FCC/100 mL,
then you will reduce monitoring to quarterly. If any subsequent quarterly test
is greater than 14, you will immediately contact DWQ with the results and
discuss any modification to the monitoring plan in accordance with DWQ's
instruction and implement more frequent monitoring at DWQs request. If this
occurs, I'll visit with Shellfish Sanitation and determine whether the levels
you are discharging are a threat for closing the shellfish waters. I'll find out
at that point too whether you will need more frequent monitoring. Monthly may
not be often enough based on the fecal levels. By law, we cannot permit a
discharge that removes a use for surface waters and certainly not the taking of
shellfish. This is why I was really encouraging you to go non discharge. I'll
need some help from Shellfish to determine what levels may be a problem. I'm
hoping maintaining a low discharge flow will help provide some protection if the
levels of bacteria are high. . . although by law dilution is not supposed to be
used to control pollutant levels. Tidal effects too in the creek can make a
difference. Your discharge can have a greater effect during low tide than high.
Shellfish Sanitation has some monitoring stations in that creek and we'll have
to cross that bridge when we get to it. . . so I can't make any promises on what
® we may require when we get to that point. Let's hope we don't have a problem.
You'll need to follow up on the Fecal data once you've submitted samples so the
lab doesn't drag their feet for weeks before they report to you. You need to
specify that you will be willing to modify the O & M if the results of the fecal
testing prove problematic for the shellfish resource. We'll have to figure out
llttp://webmail.ec.rr.com/do/mail/rnessage/preview?msgld=INBOXDELIM 10478&1=en-US... 2/1/2012 I

f
S i
:.. ,
Date: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1 1:10 AM
From: wfparker@ec_rr.corn
To. Willis, Linda <[e-mail]>, Jones, Jennifer <jennifer.jones@ncdenr,gov>, Bennett, Bradley
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Styron Pit'- OLR permit # 15-21 and 16-27
Linda,
When I began the process for a new sand mine permit in Hay, 2011, you have
helped me through designing a :nine that was -feasible for me and enviromentally a
good thing. Ashley Rogers of DLR worked :with me to process my application and I
received the Permit 16-72 on Jan. 11, 2012. I did show the Styron Pit for
storing my discharge with no outlet on my application and that is 4•rhat was
approved. You have been out of your bray to help me and I sincerely appreciate
it.
The issue that Jennifer is working on relates to the old Styron permit 16-21
which I had transferred on Oc_. 3, 2011. In our discussion you said I would be
grandfa:.hered to discharge the same as Mr. Styron. When I emailed you in Dec.
to let you know I was ready to begin dewaterirg you stated that I need to
monitor the discharge and gave me good instructions of what to do. i
immediately hired the lab and Trill do sampling and report as required. However,
when Jennifer contacted me a few weeks ago about a perm t for a pollutant
discharge permit I became frustrated. If I had not checked in with you in
December and 'began. pumping, I could have been in violation. It would have been
nice to know that in October so that I could 'paved applied earlier. I have
forwarded my application for this permit and hope to get get it soon.
The disconnect is when DLR transfers an existing permit to a new owner, DWO and
other agencies should be involved so that all permits are transferred or aquired
it the old owner was not in compliance.
I am in good shape with my permits, Jennifer and I are only trying to help the
process.
I would Like to restate the you, Ashley, Judy, Gabrielle and Jennifer have done
nothing to obstruct my plans and have gone well above to help me and I do
appreciate it.
The process is long and expensive when you consider fees, engineering, pumps,
equipment, purchasing the land, taxes on the land in hopes of employing manpower
and selling materials for construction projects and hoping to make a profit at
the end.
I know this is lengthy, but felt l need to respond to you.
RespeCtfully,
W.F. Parker
The disconnect is the sya
El

•
NCDENR
OF
Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCG020000
FOR AGFNCY USE ONLY
Data Rccciscd
Ycar
N-101101
D '
Ccrtiricatc of cove me
,r
Check w Aim=
Pcnnil Assi'11Cd tU
NOTICE OF INTENT '�Svw
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000: kiltw
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as: •
SIC (Standard' ; atrial Classification) Code - y 4XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The followir ; " �",',re also included:
Actin .7
SF
' A
0R A.
s
The,,
• Point
dredging
,Orations (including borrow pits --except for NCOOT borrow pits) that discharge
., nr that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate
:41.rcts or waste products located on the site of such operations;
activities at mining operations;
, =.wastewater; and/or
C'j
c�A�c�,�,��' coverage under this General permit:=
Ry;F�, A, �',.= -nining. and metal mining;
' �9Fj yeoR�� ­!�;-rnixed on site with stormwater from asphalt
and
For new mining site. .: , \ \
NOl is also an APPLICA -%v, d
submitted at least 90 days r.
For exi� sting mining sites that re,,
This NOI is also an APPLICATION F��?4d
Construction, modification, yr instailatior. `` rr
ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG{�� "�a;�9�� • ,
Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or .
to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138. Please see the .µ
treatment facilities require art ATC (summarized in Table
to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of Co.
treatment facilities must comply with requirements of 15A NCAC 2H
09T
F
Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATClATL.
at new or existing mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plc.
.d of NCG020000:
+ions (i.e_, sand
"es: This
be
knit
jd
Page 1 of 9
As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106 �...
,unless treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees inlemal to the company `' t. = .alified to perform
such work for their respective companies in accordance tivith General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications mu, signed and sealed
by a P.E.
5W U-NCG02-NOI
Last revised 0610712010

> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:40 PM
> To: Bennett, Bradley
> Cc: ?ar"s;erCec.rr.corL; Willis, Linda; Jones, Jennifer
> Subject: Styron Pit - DLR permit 9 16-21
> Hi Bradley,.
> I just spoke with Mr. WF Parker about his Styron Pit (Circle P- Styron Pit,
DLR permit IN 16-21). He has an application coming to us in the mail and the'O&M
plan coming to Linda. Somehow we had a disconnect with DLR and our review
processes and ter. Parker wasn't notified that he needed a mining permit until
now. Mr. Parker had transferred ownership from the previous owner, but during
that process, there was no review time in there for the DFJQ RO to do a review.
I believe he started his mining permit application in October, and he has just
learnt that he needed to get a permit in the last week. As you can imagine, Mr.
Parker is pretty disappointed that it has taken this long for him to know that
he needed a DWQ permit.
> Anyway, he has sent in his application and it should be arriving shortly. I
have talked to Mr. Parker at length about this so Bradley, if you would like I.
can review his applicat:ioiY- _I.have toidµhiim I wiiT -� riority.
rinformational
nk this also illustrates the need for DLR to incorporate the
cover sheet that D97Q RDs put together in their application and
to implement this as soon as they'can. I know they are also as busy asbut it I think we need to ask them to make that a priority.
> if e any questions about this, please let me knaa.
> Thank you,
>
> Jennifer Jones
> Environmental Engineer
> NCDEi1R I DWQ f Stormwater Permitting unit
> 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1E17
> 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, KC 27604
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> Email:
> Website: ht4p: // :l.r:ce r. _,rgi' ;e;,J.;al::s/s_
> `* Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Late and may be disclosed to third parties unless the
content is exempt by statute or other regulations.'-
h,n .r tr.-, i 17 I I11t a '.'.: r t'rvnry- :"„ry, i c!.... r,...n. :;..,-.2 Q.rnnw
L.r+�..Ji...,.1. '1' J,J ! "3/ .. / Y .•i 7.a—C f>tA 1111;T TTLif1'7ff11'�}} D_1— 7iQ
I:i_�1/.,f:c4i11{I.:LFI.L,C .11.L \7t�i1 Lk 11l Dili if i l l L.7 i[I k.1 i li L't, I L�1� LL l ii��il;—..MiI L�'i.31i 1.J 1_. 1.,1 iV11 711'71l.11"i1.7... -1 til sill,

Read Message - ec.rr.com
Nage 2 of 3
Sent: Thursday, December
To: [e-mail].c�,:.
Cc: Jones, Jennifer
Subject: RE: Styron Pit
Mr. Parker,
15, 2011 1:27 PM
You'll need to measure pH and pull samples for settleable solids,
suspended solids, turbidity, fecal coliform and measure the flow t
discharged on a quarterly basis. I'd recommend contacting a state
Laboratory to help you with the first round of sampling and pH-mea
it looks like something you would want to handle yourself, you can
decision after seeing what the samplingland pH measurement entails
attached state approved laboratory list. Styron pit discharges to
stream, you should not discharge more than 50% of the 7Q10flow (re
discharge to HOW) in the receiving stream. You should not dewater
that will scour the downstream conveyance. I'd estimate the flow
(based on our site visit last summer) at_about--90,000 gallons per
need to limit the flow to about 20,-000 gallons per da ,—,That shoo
any issues for the HOW status :concerning flow. If you disagree wit
estimate, I'd recommend get.ting_USGS folks -involved and she if the
1 .-o_ w .
N a flow for you. '-{JENNIF£R?�Do -we- have contact information_..�or_Mr.
J wants to pursue-that)),we'll need a pumping plan in writin from y
(/ it via email). You need to monitor your pump rates and time every
are pumping so that you can provide us with a quarterly tat l flow
You will need to compare the data you receive from the lab ratory
effluent limitations provided in Part III Page 14 of 16 9Z your pe
thing to be aware of. . If you exceed a daily limit, yo should cc
monitor during that month, otherwise you will automa ically exceed
average with no hope of demonstrating otherwise.
Linda -`
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
-Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
content is exempt by statute or other regulations."
-----Original Message -----
From: [e-mail] 1wfoar1:[e-mail]1
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:19 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: Styron Pit
Linda,
I am getting ready to dewater the last pit on the Styron property(
16-21). Nick has inspected everything and I spoke to him today ab
Mould you advise me of what I must do to begin the permit we spoke
day in reference to the testing of the water quality of this pit?
Thanks,
WF
Previous Message I Next Message
htin://wehmail.ec.rl.com/do/mail/messap-e/view?insp[d=INBOXDEI,IM9841 1/11/2012 0—

_____original Message -----
From: ,!faaxker@ec . rr. com [wfoarke0ec. rr. _ cola]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 5:19 PM
To: Willis, Linda -
Sr
Subject: Styron Pit
Linda,
I am getting ready to dewater the last pit on the Stryon property(
16-21)- Nick has inspected everything and I spoke to him Loday ab
Would you advise me of what I must do to begin the permit we spoke I fu —
day in reference to the testing of the water quality of this pit?
Thanks,
W E'
Previous !Message I Next Message
d R u nrle, r---
http://webmail.ec-rr-com/do/nail/message/view?msgId=INBOXDELIM9841 1 /11 /2012

•
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Director and State Geologist lee Freeman, Secretary
Mr. William F. Parker
565 Neptune Drive
Cape Carteret, North Carolina 28584
RE: Mining Permit No. 16-21
Circle P Farm - Styron Pit
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr. Parker:
October 3, 2011
Your request to have the above referenced mining permit, issued to Larry W. Styron,
transferred in its entirety to you has been approved. As we have received the required surety
®in an amount sufficient to cover the present operation, I am enclosing the transferred mining
permit. The permit number and expiration date shall remain the same as before the transfer.
Please review the permit carefully and notify this office of any objections or questions
you may have concerning the terms of the permit. It is your responsibility to fully understand
and comply with the conditions of your mining permit.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage at this site is 90.7 acres and the amount of land
you are approved to disturb is 39.35 acres.
Again, if you should have any questions on this matter please contact Ms. Judy
Wehner, Assistant State Mining Specialist, at (919)-33-
?0_1 _OZZQ
Sincerely,
anet S. Boyer, PE
tate Mq'
ining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JSBIjw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton-WRC, wlenclosures
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 - Internet:http:llwww.dlr,enr. state. nc.us{pagesflandqualitysection.html
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 1 10% Posl Consumer Paper

J
•
0
> -----Original Message -----
> From: fear}:[e-mail].':cm =n-,::_rt3ec.r-.com)
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 3:12 PM
> To: Miller, Carol
> Cc: Mills, hick; t�i�c� da; Steenhuis, Joanne
> Subject: CIRCLE P FARM
> Carol,
>
> I met with Nick mills and Larry Styron on Wg6nesday, .Tune 29, 2011 at Circle P
Farm where I am reau st;.+ a minina permit We discussed the transfer of
tyron's permits to me in the near future and idick inspecte the sites and found
them to be in compliance for transfer.
my permit application and I just mailed it to start the review
process.
> if you have any questions, please call me.
7
> Respectfully,
>
> W.F. Parkes
1 ++..•/!. .n1.,,. 1 ,.. /a .1.�, ,:ll ,al .•o,ro,,,'3., ,.T 1—C' +TAX ;1nraT TA41 Cl2Q 1 rrc 71til7n17
141;�'r:! •�4.11"-'.li_rti•k e41 e".V Ai1. 1-!ti'! 111,114l 1114-"Ai i_4-J{ 1�•,a4 .1 FFFii:_F%4 _rt-n ll•'J(i ,-,--A, 11.1.'M-1k�l -411-L
6

I I
,�'
WWI
01
01

L I
tnt .Pul
•
•

(HADNOT ITl tD O
CREEK) f P
07a' 55
034' 46 02.34' N
•
(SWANSBORO)
0
004' 43' m 7T N
070' 55
SALTER PATH QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLINA
TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES (NEWPORT)
.. "' MAWN T UWN "•"
.'~ f J.
J
X- LAv'
•.
r n� z Lat 34° 44' 45.37" / - •'v
JS Lon -76' 54' 31.12" ----- - - - — -
Unavailable) V�u* v SCALE 1:24000
u
*uced
by MyTopc Tenam Navigator MILE
Topography based on USGS 1 24,000 0 1000
Maps
YARDS
NorthAmerrcan 1983 Datum (NAD83) 0 1
Lambert Conformal Conic Projection
KIEOMETER
To place on the predlded North American ON 1 OB° W CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
1927 move the protection lines I OM N ano MN 9 77° W
30M E NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM 1929
1l.rP At
034' 46' 02-W N
(MANSFIEL D)
076, S305 74' W
(Unavailable)
SALTER PATH, NC
1997
iY

p 0/Z

M j* Km
*r �
■ FIB �,3'' ,. � ' .r

1=_
�`1
IwAk,

N

`P -
0ti
4, ti7
&26-!
,
1
i a
A
A 6
girl:
lop
opt
�•
i�
k

J
r
•�
.�
s:
1 �.
� �.
,� .
�� �
4
M
/,

, ciy , YY_ t dr
IL
AL
...14
",�
dr
AL 6
Ad
%'� �-•r � _ � i �• R �, l . _ ` �F, � 1 \'dam L'r'/ � � '» � y ` , � ��.
IL
+�F Imo✓/ _
` �f •� - r » t ` ♦ _ 4._ it-Z • _I`a - - i i .�/ \ /
.49
�, ,.. �• - �''. _ � �Mq'. +�, .'.�• � - , + � err r
r ylop
'
-rri fl +-• a ;i�/i A f' i .• tit
`
�1 y� 1
4
..11w - �

�t�

•i� .:
` r'
�� i
i .i i,f �r
i U
., -. �..'

n
y

... rf rn Al C'I ID ArC
MAX. SIDE SLOPE = 2:1
EXISTING GRADE
CUT SLOPE X-SECTID=N
SCALE:
6" MIN. SOIL COVER
S�opE AT RECLAMATION
SJpE WITH SEEDING
-5 MPx• OVERBURDEN
OVERBURDEN RECLAMATION DETAIL
SCALE: (/g' = 1
TEMPORARY
TOPSOIL
STOCKPILE
EXISTING GRADE
FILL SLOPE X-".-)ECTION
SCALE:
SEED PER SEEDING
SCHEDULE
TOP OF SWALE
FLOW LINE TnP cit=VATInN np WATER
10' —(
CONTINUE RIP RAP
UP SIDES OF SPILLWAY
CLASS B RIP RAP
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP DETAIL
N. T. S.
NOTES:
1. CONSTRUCT TRAPS WITH 3:1 SIDE SLOPES MINIMUM.
2. TRAPS ARE TO BE CLEANED WHEN 1'2 SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE IS
FILLED, APPROXIMATELY EVERY MONTH.
3. TRAPS TO BE REMOVED WHEN VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED
WITHIN SWALES.
FINAL DITCH STABILIZATION DETAIL
SGALE:l%a' = 1'
STEEL OR WOOD POST
Wr'r- FABRIC r
7I L 1 6 L
--
J
EXXON GTFIOIS OR
EQUAL SECURED TO
N/F
WIRE
` J
`
CROATAN NATIONAL FOREST
FILL WITH EARTH
N/F `
STEPHEN
`
`� EUBANKS '
1(
MAINTAIN--
30' PROPERTY
LINE BUFFER
FENCE
SECTION
SIL T
`
N.T.S.
l J�
i N/F
CHARLES
ARTHUR
WOODED
N/F 1
TIMOTHY
PITCHER
N/F
CHARLES
�•'40�c �.•'' N/F 1DASINGER
MARY ,` �� L
N/F \� VANCE
NIF \VIERRA
BARBARA \ ��
N/F \'YOUNGBLOOD
��g,5 ',i I ��, \•, BARBARA �\ \ EXISTING
y
�Y. UNGBLOOO \\ WOODED
\ �� AREA
N/F
V
EX. STEEL GATEBARACADE
A,,, p
t
NIF
RICHARD GALLOND �• �'
i
SHEET #1 OF 1
fd: PM756
Tyr i�FF O^t.l
ti
N/F
WILLIAM PARKER
APPROXIMATE
WOODS LINE
MPQRARY nRr,iNA F —
iiCH 101 BE FILLED
:OR HAUL ROAD AS
Id I NE AREA EXPANDS
CENTER LINE OF
PROPOSED 10' HAUL ROAD
LEGEND:
ECM EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
EIP EXISTING IRON PIPE
EIR EXISTING IRON ROD
EPK EXISTING PK NAIL
R/W RIGHT—OF—WAY
pp WER
200 100 0 200 400 TEL 'TELEPHONEEPEDESTAL
OE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
MHW MEAN HIGH WATER
RRS RAILROAD SPIKE
N/F NOW OR FORMERLY
SCALE: 1" = 200` 0 WETLANDS
30' BUFFER
V 1-11+ 7 T�,.1 11 LIr T r-..77 T^-T�-'- fi^, r
r -
�._
J,; •t h �itq r r i 4�J{I rlI, JOf fi, �•l�llj Yl
`t
TEMPORARY l`RA.INArF
U I I CH I U e �. i- I `- i
FOR HAUL ROAD AS
MINE AREA EXPANDS
1.25 AC AREA MINED IN 2005
THIS COMPLETED EXCAVAT10j�
AND STOCKPILING NORTH OF
WETLANDS AREA
N/F
CROATAN NATIONA )REST
SILT FENCE
EXISTING DITCH
TO WETLANDS
�--PROPOSED EXTENSION
SEEDING SCHEDULE
SEED BED PREPARATION
LIME----------------------------- 2 TONS/AC.
10-10-20------------------------- 1,000 LBS./AC
0-20-0---------------------------- 500 LBS./AC (AFTER SEEDING)
ASPHALT TACK-- ------------------ 200 GAL./TON OF MULCH
SEEDING MIXTURE
(FEBRUARY 1 —APRIL 30)
TALL FESCUE—" -------------------- 50 LBS./AC
PENSACOLA BANIAGRASS---------10 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED)---50 LBS./AC
(MAY 1 —AUGUST 31)
TALL FESCUE--=------------------ 50 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA(SCARIFIED)----50 LBS./AC
BROWNTOP MILLET--------------- 25 LBS./AC
(SEPTEMBER 1 - JANUARY 31)
TALL FESCUE---------------------- 60 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (UNSCARIFIED)--- 60 LBS./AC
RYE (GRAIN)---------------------- 25 LBS./AC
FOR SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER ADD 30 LBS./AC SERICEA LESPEDEZA
LANDSCAPING MIXTURE
(JANUARY 1 — MARCH 31)
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (UNHULLED) ----- 20LBS. LBS./AC
(APRIL 1 — JULY 31)
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (HULLED) -------- 12 LBS./AC
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS SPRINGS MAY BE USED.
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
TOTAL TRACT AREA
90.70
AC
EXISTING PERMIT AREA
17.55
AC
EX. EXCAVATION PIT AREA
5.43
AC
EX. HAUL ROAD AREA
0.81
AC
PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREA
0.00
AC
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL
20.20
AC
EXCAVATION PIT AREA
PROPOSED HAUL ROAD AREA
1.60
AC
TOTAL PROPOSED
20.20
AC
EXCAVATION AREA
TOTAL
PROPOSED AFFECTED ACREAGE
21.80
AC
p
ft
OF EXISTING DITCH TO
SEDIMENT TRAP
1'W
J
(o
—RIPRAP
e1„Y1YY1etYO,
APRON I!!
�a
TO OUT
-FLOW : �0r•° FF` �� °°���// •,
DI TCHSEAL
• ,�O a
. p•
111
J
,,,,�I>aYYYYVYVi3Yyya
J
CHRONOLOGICAL SEQUENCE OF
LAND D I STURBAI'lCE ACT I V I TY
1.
) CLEARING & GR11"IB I NG
2.)
INSTALLATION 0P EROSION
CONTROL MEASUr—�r'
3.)
DEWATERING
4.
) EXCAVATION OF <, %D
5.
) HAULING OF EXC ;.`v'ATED MATERIAL
6.)
RECLAMATION OF AFFECTED LAND
r
NOTES:
I-)
NO KNOWN WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF EXCAVATION AREAS.
2.)
TRACT SHOWN IS LOCATED IN FLOOD
ZONE C (AREA OF MINIMAL FLOODING)
AS CLASSIFIED & SHOWN ON F.E.M.A.
CARTERET CO. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE
MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO.370043 0475 C
3•)
TEMPORARY STOCKPILES & WASTE PILES
SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PREMISES PRIOR
TO RECLAMATION PROCESS. ON SITE ROAD-
WAYS SHALL BE REGRADED & RESEEDED
PRIOR TO RECLAMATION PROCESS.
4.)
MINING ACTIVITY SHALL BE RESTRICTED
TO A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 300' FROM
ANY NEIGHBORING DWELLING HOUSE,
PUBLIC ROAD OR PUBLIC, COMMERCIAL OR
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING.
5.)
EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING SHALL BE
STRICTLY PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE.
6.)
EXISTING STEEL GATE BARRACADE SHALL
BE MAINTAINED FOR DURATION OF PERMIT.
7.)
NO FUEL TANKS, SOLVENTS, OR OTHER 4,
CHEMICAL REAGENTS SHALL BE STORED v
ON SITE.
REVISIONS:
Na BY DATE
DESCRIPTION
I
GYT
10126100
WETLANDS INFO/EXPAA
2
GYT
04IR610il
EXPANSION
3
CPT
1012310
ADD OfTCHES
,r -I
4
CPT
I/19104
2003 ANNUAL REPORT
I/25/05
- `: (f , -k
5
CPT
2004 ANNUAL REPORT
6
CPT
I/23/06
2005 ANNUAL REPORT
7
CPT
11110107
2006 ANNUAL REPORT
CIRCLE P FARM-STYRON BORROW PIT
NEWPORT TOWNSHIP.CARTERET COUNTY,NORTH CAROLINA
APPLICANT: W.F. PARKER SURVEYED
ADDRESS: C.J.
565 NEPTUNE DRIVE DRAWN
CAPE CARTERET, NC 28584 G Y T
PHONE:
[phone] APPROVED:
STROUD ENGINEERING, E.A. RDC
HESTRON PLAZA ONE SUITE 102 DATE:
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 1 1 /10/00
7-7479
SCALE
".T A R T� ♦'.. F'7r. ♦ r4-•7 ^r. rti T7 1 " .-.. '. n:-
T-'/+'