NCG020746_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20110211

NTv ; TZ o
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/v Cc, Oo� D -7 L/
DOC TYPE
-�JIHISTORICALFILE
0 MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ � 0� c� I I
YYYYMMDD

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Petc Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Dear Mr. Rouse:
�ir..■.,..,��
NCDEN6R
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
February 11, 2011
Subject; General Permit No. NCG020000
Rouse Borrow Pond
COC NCG020746
Carteret County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on January 29, 2009, subsequent
additional information provided between June 3, 2010 and August 17, 2010, and DWQ's site visit
performed June 15, 2010, we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge
stormwater under the subject state -- NI'DES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently
amended).
Please note that this permit authorizes stormwater discharges only. Mine dewatering, including any
type of pit discharge, is not allowed under any circumstances by this permit. Failure to abide by this
constraint will constitute a permit violation and may be subject to enforcement action including the
assessment of significant civil penalties as described in the Part IV, Section A of the permit text. Periodic
visual and analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges is necessary under this permit along with a
number of other requirements found in the permit text. Please familiarize yourself and comply with all
requirements of the permit to prevent future non-compliance issues and potential enforcement actions
by the Wilmington Regional Office.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of
Water Quality. 'the Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of
the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits
which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please feel free to contact Cory Larsen at (919) 807-
6365 or cory.larseii(@ncdenr.gov or Linda Willis at [phone].
One
NpoiCarolina
North Carolina Division ❑ , Water' Quality 1617 M.iiI Service Ccnter Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Cuslomer Service
Internet: Nvtivw,ncu';tlrruualill'.or> Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunirylAttirmative Action Employer —1001% Recycled130% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Billy IZousC, Jr.
IZouse Bon -ow fond
1=Cbruary 11, 2011
vs,
Sincerely,
t.
for Coleen H. S lies
CC. Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
DLR, Ashley Rodgers
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Encl.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUAI.1-1-Y
GENERAL PERMITNO. NCG020000
CER'r1FIlCATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020746
STORMWATL'-R DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISC IIARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-21 S. 1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal. Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
BILLY ROUSE, JR.
is hereby authorized to discharge stornmater only from a facility located at
Rouse Borrow Pond
123 Pete Road
Newport, NC
Carteret County
to receiving waters designated as Jumping Run , a class SA; FIQW water in the White Oak River
Basin, in accordance with -the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions
set forth in Parts 1, II, 111, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate ofcoverage shall become effective February 11, 2011.
This Certificate of Coverage sh.xll remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day February 11, 201 l .
.1br Coleen 1-1. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

4A,
LOCATION MAP:
V"'
j3 R� Dose Borrow Pond
li .i
CROATA
II .
__i ��vC--� ' i `ter • ` IN
S�"•� • 1' f•rN
S��
-
���''�■g}c
S.
, f �r•• . _ ! � II r:f� �
_ � _.-����il_.�
�/>,
�-tiG.__� ,mot•.!' 1` �
-r it
r
^s.
�a
�•'n : �s�'
•. • 'ys_�.
' I Lghte
- � pDaybeawn �,�
..� d`,
.• � _ • .. eURYbR8Co11 �,. � �� .
d peg6�aeo. .
FT`R�aY eUgM
oDayMnnRn ' '
NCG02074f
it
map Scale 1,.20,000
Billy Rouse Jr.
Rouse Borrow Pond
Lab tude : 340 44' 16" N
Longitude: 760 52' 57" W
County: Carteret
Receiving Stream: Jumping Run
Stream Class: SA; HQW
Sub -basin: 03-05-03 (White Od< River Basin)
Facility Location

Larsen, Cory
From:
Rodgers, Ashley
Sent:
Friday, February 04, 2011 3,24 PM
To:
Mills, Nick; Willis, Linda
Cc:
Larsen, Cory
Subject:
Rouse's Borrow Pond
Attachments:
16-69 new,pdf
Linda, Nick, and Cory,
Mr. Rouse's mining permit was just issued. I've faxed him a copy, and a scanned copy is
attached.
Just wanted you all to know - he will be starting immediately. I think he was actually going
to start digging again this afternoon as soon as he got the faxed copy.
Thanks,
Ashley
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
16-69 new
Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving
certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how
attachments are handled.
2-1 11) t I! r'7%W*-L 0 6HO-f—k
--� r Q-� It t7 o k w� Sw
n
1

Permit No.: L1/C/_�
Facility N 1
County:
Inspector;
Date of Inspection:
By thi,Aignaturet 1
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
. //
! I 1 I Q Ql or Certi t at _., fc of Covetage No.: NIQIQ/Q/ f�l Q! /131 /.
Phonl No/7516 - - 3o3
that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signa&ire of Permittrj or Designee)
1. Outfall Descriptdon
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
t
2. Color / .,, •1 ,
Describe the color of the discharge using basic colo ( , bro k i t�t�ght,medium,
dark) as descriptors: /'
3. Odor
Describe any distin odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of we�am10 or.
etc.)
4. Clarity /
Choose the ber which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Pege I
�1
SWU-242-I01 S99

NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Director and State Geologist Dee Freeman, Secretary
February 4, 2011
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
Rouse's Septic Tank
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Re-' Rouse Borrow Pond
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr. Rouse:
The application for a mining permit for the above referenced mine site has been found
to meet the requirements of G.S. 74-51 of The Mining Act of 1971, As we have received the
required security to cover this application, I am enclosing the mining permit.
The conditions of Mining Permit No._16-59 were based primarily upon information
supplied in the application with conditions added as necessary to insure compliance with The
Mining Act of 1971, This permit expires on F'ebrua 4 2021. G.S. 74-65 states that the
issuance of a mining permit does not supersede or otherwise affect or prevent the
enforcement of any zoning regulation or ordinance duly adopted by an incorporated city or
county or by any agency or department of the State of North Carolina.
As a reminder, your permitted acreage and affected acreage for this site are both 5.25
acres, as indicated in the application and on the mine map last revised November 29, 2010.
Please review the permit and contact Ashley Rodgers, Assistant State Mining
Specialist, at [phone] of any objection or questions concerning the terms of the permit.
Sincerely,
JahtS. oyer, PE
State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
JSBIar
Enclosures. Permit No. 16-69
Notice of Issuance
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Ms. Shannon Deaton -WRC, w/permit
Mr. William Gerringer-DOL, Mine and Quarry Bureau, w/o enclosures
US Fish and Wildlife Service, wl permit
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 - Internet:http://tivwvl.dir.enr.state.nc.us/pagesAandqualitysection,html
An Equal Opportunity 1Affirmalive Actlon Employer-50% Recycled / 10% Post Consumer Paper

5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
1 is no solids and 10 is the surface covered with floating solids: _
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspei ded solids in the stormwater discharge
where 1 is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy: (� _
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 � (D
7. Foam ,, }
Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? Yes No �j O 11� Q -L
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Polludon
List and describc
Note: Low clarity, high olids, andbr the presence of foam or oil sheen may be indicative of pollutant
exposure. Thes conditions may warmt further investigation.
Page 2
5 WU-242-101599

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
PERMIT
for the operation of a mining activity
In accordance with the provisions of G.S. 74-46 through 68, "The Mining
Act of 1971," Mining Permit Rule 15A NCAC 5 B, and other applicable
laws, rules and regulations
Permission is hereby granted to;
Billy Rouse, Jr. — Rouse's Septic Tank
Rouse Borrow Pond
Carteret County - Permit No. 16-69
for the operation of a
Sand Mine
which shall provide that the usefulness, productivity and scenic values of
all lands and waters affected by this mining operation will receive the
greatest practical degree of protection and restoration,
MINING PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE; February 4, 2021

StorMwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: N/C/QI I p/Q/QlVl Ql or Certcat of Coverage No.'. N/C /G/Ql�l 01 /I,�i /.
Facility N r `
County: 6pi J;,/rcll Phont No. 6 - - 3d 3
Inspector:
Date of Inspection:
By this Oinature, I certify thAthis report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee ur.Designee)
I. Outfall Description
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.)
Receiving Stream:
Describe the, industrial actyvities that occur ,#ithin theloutfall draingge areA:
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge n co �Iwn.asicblue, etc.) and tint (light, medium,
dark) as descriptors;
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge
etc.} rx
weak chlorine odor.
4. Clarity
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where 1 is clear and 10 is very
cloudy:
0
1 2 3 4 5 600� `~
Pap I
SWU•242.101599

Page 2
In accordance with the application for this mining permit, which is hereby approved by the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the Department,
and in conformity with the approved Reclamation Plan attached to and incorporated as part of
this permit, provisions must be made for the protection of the surrounding environment and for
reclamation of the land and water affected by the permitted mining operation. This permit is
expressly conditioned upon compliance with all the requirements of the approved Reclamation
Plan. However, completed performance of the approved Reclamation Plan is a separable
obligation, secured by the bond or other security on file with the Department, and may survive
the expiration, revocation or suspension of this permit,
This permit is not transferable by the permittee with the following exception: If another
operator succeeds to the interest of the permittee in the permitted mining operation, by virtue
of a sale, lease, assignment or otherwise, the Department may release the permittee from the
duties imposed upon him by the conditions of his permit and by the Mining Act with reference
to the permitted operation, and transfer the permit to the successor operator, provided that
both operators have complied with the requirements of the Mining Act and that the successor
operator agrees to assume the duties of the permittee with ,reference to reclamation of tie
affected land and posts a suitable bond or other security.
In the event that the Department determines that the permittee or permittee`s successor is not
complying with the Reclamation Plan or other terms and conditions of this permit, or is failing
to achieve the purposes and requirements of the Mining Act, the Department may give the
operator written notice of its intent to modify, revolve or suspend the permit, or its intent to
modify the Reclamation Plan as incorporated in the permit. The operator shall have right to a
hearing at a designated time and place on any proposed modification, revocation or
suspension by the Department. Alternatively and in addition to the above, the Department
may institute other enforcement procedures authorized by law.
Definitions
Wherever used or referred to in this permit, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
terms shall have the same meaning as supplied by the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-49.
Expiration Date
This permit shall be effective from the date of its issuance until February 4, 2021,
Conditions
This permit shall be subject to the provisions of the Mining Act, N.C.G.S. 74-46, et. seq., and
to the following conditions and limitations:

'J:. U130FATORIEs. INC.
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Will Pineda
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
NC Certincaticn No. 402
�Ui€-Service ?naiytical 3 SC Certification No. 99o12
NC Drfnking Water Cert No. 37735
Environmental Solutions -
Project: CHT-005
Lab Submittal Date: 10/25/2010
Prism Work Order: 0100645
Case Narrative
1110212010
This data package contains the analytical results For the project identified above and incUes a Case Narrative, Sample
Results and Chain of Custody. Unless otherwise noted, all samples were received in acceptable condition and processed
according to the referenced methods.
Data qualifiers are Flagged individually on each sample. A key reference for the data qualifiers appears at the end of this case
narrative.
Please call it you have any questions relating to this analytical report.
Respectfully,
PRISM LABORATORIES, INC.
a_�-1
VP Laboratory Services
Data Qualifiers Key Reference:
Reviewed By
HT Sample received and analyzed outside of the hold time.
BRL Below Reporting Limit
MDL Method Detection Limit
RPD Relative Percent Difference
* Results reported to the reporting limit. All other results are reported to the MDL with values between MDL and
reporting limit indicated with a J.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte. NC 28224.0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-8001529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page O� 6

Page 3
OPERATING CONDITIONS:
A. Any wastewater processing or mine dewatering shall be in accordance with the
permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission,
B. Any stormwater runoff from the affected areas at the site shall be in accordance
with any applicable permit requirements and regulations promulgated by the
Environmental Protection Agency and enforced by the N.C. Environmental
Management Commission. It shall be the permittee's responsibility to contact
the Division of Water Quality to secure any necessary stormwater permits or
other approval documents.
2. A. Any mining process producing air contamination emissions shall be subject to
the permitting requirements and rules promulgated by the N,C. Environmental
Management Commission and enforced by the Division of Air Quality.
*B. During mining operations, water trucks or other means that may be necessary
shall be utilized to prevent dust from leaving the permitted area.
A. Sufficient buffer (minimum 50 foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between any
affected land and any adjoining waterway or wetland to prevent sedimentation of
that waterway or wetland from erosion of the affected land and to preserve the
integrity of the natural watercourse or wetland.
B. Any mining activity affecting waters of the State, waters of the U. S., or wetlands
shall be in accordance with the requirements and regulations promulgated and
enforced by the N. C. Environmental Management Commission,
4. A. Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen
dikes, check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be
provided in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent
sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland
or natural watercourse in proximity to the affected land.
B. All drainage from the affected areas around the mine.excavation shall be
diverted internal to said excavation.
C. No dewatering activities shall occur at this site.
D. Mining activities shall occur as indicated on the mine map last revised November
29, 2010 and the supplemental information received by the Land Quality Section
on January 29, 2009, July 15, 2010, and August 3, 2010.

Rw R ISM Fullironm Ce al Solutions
s
�•� x. Environmenf 0.l Solutions
Sample Receipt Summary
11 /02/2010
Prism Work Order: 0100645
Client Sample ID Lab Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
OUTFALL 1 0100645-01 Water 10/25/10 10/25/10
Samples received it good condition at 11.6 degrees C unless otherwise noted.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - ToH Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 2 of 6

Page 4
5. All permit boundaries (5.25 acres) shall be permanently marked at the site on 100-foot
intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing intervals,
6.' The angle for graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle, which can be
retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposed slopes or any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause off -site damage because of sedimentation, shall be planted or otherwise
provided with ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
7. The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of pools of water that are,
or likely to become, noxious or foul, Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
8. Existing vegetation or vegetated earthen berms shall be maintained between the mine
and public thoroughfares whenever practical to screen the operation from the public.
9. Sufficient buffer (minimum 25 foot unexcavated) shall be maintained between any
excavation and any mining permit boundary to protect adjacent property.
10, A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of the
mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit
area unless authorization to conduct said disposal has first been obtained from
both the Division of Waste Management and the Land Quality Section,
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. The method of disposal
shal€ be consistent with the approved reclamation- plan.
B. Mining refuse as defined by G.S. 74-49 (14) of The Mining Act of 1971
generated on -site and directly associated with the mining activity may be
disposed of in a designated refuse area. All other waste products must be
disposed of in a disposal facility approved by the Division of Waste
Management. No petroleum products, acids, solvents or their storage containers
or any other material that may be considered hazardous shall be disposed of
within the permitted area.
C. For the purposes of this permit, the Division of. Land Resources considers the
following materials to be "mining refuse" (in addition to those specifically listed
under G.S. 74-49 (14) of the N.C. Mining Act of 1971):
1. on -site generated land clearing debris
2. conveyor belts
3. wire cables
4. v-belts
5. steel reinforced air hoses
6, drill steel
.IV

I
Fullironaien Analytical s
dMV""�yyyy�aLt E 11111 Environmental Solutions
• ".it''�myu.tli� . 11131]IATp11Li INI:.
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Attn: Will Pineda
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Laboratory Report
11 /02/2010
Project: CHT-005 Client Sample ID: OUTFALL 1
Prism Sample ID: 0100645-01
Prism Work Order: 0100645
Sample Matrix: Water Time Collected: 10/25/10 12:00
Time Submitted: 10/25/10 12:06
Parameter
Result
Units
Report
Limit
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Method
Analysis Analyst
Date/Time
Batch
ID
General Chemistry Parameters
Chemical Oxygen Demand
BRL
mg1L
50
6.9
1
'SM5220 D
10/29/10 11:43
AGS
POJ0636
Oil & Grease (HEM)
BRL
mg1L
5.0
1.2
1
'1664A
10/27110 10:15
CDE
POJC608
pH
6.8
pH Units
1
'SoM4500-H B
10/27110 11:15
JAB
POJ0547
Total Suspended Solids
87
mg/L
12
1.5
1
Ism 2540 0
10128110 13:45
JAB
POJ0600
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224.0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1.8001529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 3 of 6

Page 5
D. If mining refuse is to be permanently disposed within the mining permit
boundary, the following information must be provided to and approved by the
Division of Land Resources prior to commencement of such disposal;
1. the approximate boundaries and size of the refuse disposal area;
2, a list of refuse items to be disposed;
3. verification that a minimum of 4 feet of cover will be provided over the
refuse;
4. verification that the refuse will be disposed at least 4 feet above the
seasonally high water table; and,
5. verification that a permanent vegetative groundcover will be established.
11. An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
12. The operator shall notify the Department in writing of the desire to delete, modify or
otherwise change any part of the mining, reclamation, or erosion/sediment control plan
contained in the approved application for a mining permit or any approved revision to it.
Approval to implement such changes -must be obtained from the Department prior to
on -site implementation of the revisions.
13. The security, which was posted pursuant to N.C.G.S. 74-54 in the form of a $7,000.00
cash bond, is sufficient to cover the operation as indicated in the approved application.
This security must remain in force for this permit to be valid. The total affected land
shall not exceed the bonded acreage.
14. A. Authorized representatives of the Division of Archives and History shall be
granted access to the site to determine the presence of significant
archaeological resources.
B, Pursuant to N. C, G. S. 70 Article 3, "The Unmarked Human Burial and Human
Skeletal Remains Protection Act," should the operator or any person in his
employ encounter human skeletal remains, immediate notification shall be
provided to the county medical examiner and the chief archaeologist, North
Carolina Division of Archives and History.

Level H QC Report
RIS M
1Full-Service al S utio 9 Environmental 5� utiana 1112f1❑
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Project: CHT-005 Prism Work Order: 0100645
Attn: Will Pineda Time Submitted: 10/25/2010 12:O6:0GPrvl
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
General Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD
Analvte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Batch POJ0547 - NO PREP
LCS (POJ0547-BSI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/27110 HT
PH
6.91 phi Units
99-101
Duplicate (POJ0547-DUP1)
Source: 0100645-01
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/27/10 HT
pH
6.83 pH Units
6.81 0.3 10
Batch POJ0600 - NO PREP
Blank (POJ0600-BLKI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/28/10
Total Suspended Solids
BRL 5.0 mglL
LCS (POJ0600-BSI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/29/10
Total Suspended Solids
410 25 mg/L
406 101 90-110
Duplicate (POJ0600-DUP1)
Source: 0100645-01
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/28/10
Total Suspended Solids
74 12 mglL
87 15 20
Batch POJ0608 - NO PREP
Blank (POJ0608-BLK1)
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/27/10
Oil & Grease (HEM)
BRL 5.0 mg/L
_
LCS (POJ0608-BS1)
Prepared & Analyzed: 10/27/10
Oil & Grease (HEM)
33.8 5.0 mglL
_
40.0 84 78-114
Duplicate (POJ0608-DUPI)
Source: 0100645-01
Prepared & Analyz_ed_: 10/27/10
Oil & Grease (HEM)
_ BRL 5.0 mg/L
BRL i - 18
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Roast - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-8001529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 4 of 6

Page 6
APPROVED RECLAMATION PLAN
The Mining Permit incorporates this Reclamation Plan, the performance of which is a condition
on the continuing validity of that Mining Permit. Additionally, the Reclamation Plan is a
separable obligation of the permittee, which continues beyond the terms of the Mining Permit.
The approved plan provides:
Minimum Standards As Provided By GS 74-53
The final slopes in all excavations in soil, sand, gravel and other unconsolidated
materials shall be at such an angle as to minimize the possibility of slides and be
consistent with the future use of the land.
2. Provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property must be provided in all
excavations in rock.
3. All overburden and spoil shall be left in a configuration which is in accordance with
accepted conservation practices and which is suitable for the proposed subsequent use
of the land.
4. No small pools of water shall be allowed to.collect or remain on the mined area that are,
or are likely to become noxious; odious or foul.
5. The revegetation plan shall conform to accepted and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment
Station and the North Carolina Forest Service.
6. Permittee shall conduct reclamation activities pursuant to the Reclamation Plan herein
incorporated. These activities shall be conducted according to the time schedule
included in the plan, which shalt to the extent feasible provide reclamation simultaneous
with mining operations and in any event, provide reclamation at the earliest practicable
time after completion or termination of mining on any segment of the permit area and
shall be completed within two years after completion or termination of mining.
RECLAMATION CONDITIONS:
Provided further, and subject to the Reclamation schedule, the planned reclamation
shall be to restore the mine excavation to a lake area and to grade and revegetate the
adjacent disturbed areas.
2. The specifications for surface gradient restoration to a surface suitable for the planned
future use are as follows:
A. The lake area shall be excavated to maintain a minimum water depth of four feet
measured from the tow water table elevation.
't :r..

' P0 1 S Full irc mnu al Golutpo ,s
a�vn Environmentui Solutions
.-54�YF34,' . ­ATOAIEM,i
Level Il QC Report
� 112/10
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Project: CHT-005 Prism Work Order: 0100645
Attn: Will Pineda Time Submitted: 10/25/2010 12:06:OOPNI
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
General Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Reporting Spike Source %REC RFD
Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPO Limit Notes
Batch POJ0636 - NO PREP
Blank (POJ0636-SLK1 ) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/29/10
Chemical Oxygen Demand BRL 50 mgfL
L_CS (POJ0636-851) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/29/10
Chemical Oxygen !Demand - ^ 420 50 mg/L 400 105 90-110
Sample Extraction Data
NO PREP
Lab Number
Batch
Initial Final Date
0100645-01
POJ0636
2 mL 2 mL 10129/10
0100645-01
POJ0547
50 mL 50 mL 10/27/10
0100645-01
P0J0600
200 mL 200 mL 10/28/10
0100645-01
POJC608
900 mL 900 mL 10/27/10
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Page 5 Df 6 Phone: 704I529-6354 -Toll Free Number: 1-8001529-6
364 -Fax: 704l525-0409

Page 7
B. The side slopes to the lake excavation shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1
vertical or flatter to the water line and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below the
water line.
C. Any areas used for wastepiles, screening, stockpiling or other processing shall
be leveled and smoothed.
D. No contaminants shalt be permanently disposed of at the mine site, On -site
disposal of waste shall be in accordance with Operating Condition Nos. 10A
through 10D.
E. The affected land shalt be graded to prevent the collection of noxious or foul
water.
3. Revegetation Plan;
After site preparation, all disturbed land areas shall be revegetated as per the
Revegetation Plan approved by Ronald D. Cullipher, PE on January 27, 2009 or the
following:
Permanent Seeding Specifications
Dates Species
February 15- April 1 Kobe Lespedeza
Bahiagrass
Redtop
Winter rye (grain)
April 1- July 31
August 1- October 25
October 25- February 15
Common Bermuda
Lespedeza (unscarified)
German millet
Rye (grain- temporary)
Rate. Lbs/Acre
10
50
1
15
50
30
40
120
Soil Amendmerts
Lime - 2000 Ibslacre or follow recommendations from a soil test.
Fertilizer - 1000 Ibslacre 8-8-8 or 10-10-10, or follow recommendations from a soil
test.
Mulch - All seeded areas shall be mulched using small grain straw at a rate of 2000
Ibslacre and anchored appropriately.

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Permit Number: NCGO60000 SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: 2010
Certificate of Coverage No. NCG060131 (This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from
FACILITY NAME: Valley Proteins (Carolina By Products) the laboratory.)
COUNTY: Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES: Larry Wray PHONE NO. 336-333-3030
CERTIFIED LA80RATORY: PRISM LAB NUMBER: 402
PLEASE SIGN ON THE REVERSE
Part A: Specific M nitoring Re uimments
No
_ p
Sam fe
Collected
mold r'
_..
Total Su'
y spended
Solids
m '
pH
S_ tandard units
m Chemical OxygenO
Demand
rrr IL
rt'and Grease
mg&
='Fecal Coliform
Colones per 100 mf
Benchmark
- -
-t00
- <.Withiri'6.0-9.0 ..
A20
1
0811-3112010
No Rain
2
08/1.3112011
No Rain
3
08l4-3112012
No Rain
4
08l1-3112013
No Rain
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you mush implement Tier f or Teir 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
Does this facitity perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oit per month? Yes
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements
a
-
No
Sample '
Oil TandGreasej
Total Suspended
pH
New motor Oil Usage
Collected
rnglL
Solids
Standard un€#s'Rnnua[
average ga€/mo
W ;�.
mold
m
Bent hmarkm
�_.
r _ 30..
100,
-6.0 90
3
0811-31/2010
No Rain
50 gal. Mo
Note: It you report a sampled value in excess or the oenchmarx value, or outside the benchmark range tor pm, you mush implement r ier t or t eir 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS: Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
08111-3112010 (first event sampled) Attn: DWO Central Files
Total Event Precipitation (inches): None 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Date: (list each additional event sampled this reporting period and rainfall amount)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
"I certify, under penalty of taw, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted.
Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best o1 my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for
knowing violations."
//-
lgnature of Perm ee) (Date)
S W U-24 9-102107

Page 8
Whenever possible, disturbed areas should be vegetated with native warm season
grasses such as switch grass, Indian grass, bluestem and gamma grass.
In addition, the permittee shall consult with a professional wildlife biologist with the N.C.
Wildlife Resources Commission to enhance post -project wildlife habitat at the site.
4. Reclamation Plan;
Reclamation shall be conducted simultaneously with mining to the extent feasible. In
any event,, reclamation shall be initiated as soon as feasible after completion or
termination of mining of any mine segment under permit. Final reclamation, including
revegetation, shall be completed within two years of completion or termination of
mining.
Permit issued this 4ih day of February 2011.
James D. Simons, Director
Division of Land Resources
By Authority of the Secretary
Of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
Permit No.: NICIQI IQ/Q/Q/QI C7/ or Certificat , of Coverage No.: NICIGIQI,(2I�111,�1
Facility N f
County: Phon6 No.
Inspector:
Date of Inspection: aWL) �2 G 2A-40 _
By tl is ignaturri cq tit that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Sigffature of Permit'ree or Designee)
1. Outfall Description
Outfail No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc,)
Receiving Stream:
2. Color
Describe the color of the discharge using basic
dark) as descriptors:
3. Odor
Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i
etc.) 1
4. Clarity
bro u etc. ti tt 'ght, medium,
Its ong,�l eak chlorine odor,
k
Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge where I is clear and 10 is very
cloudy'.
l z 3 4 s 6
�1�
Page I
$ WU•242.101599

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF
MINING PERMIT
You have previously expressed an interest and/or are listed as an adjoining
landowner in the application for a mining permit filed by Billy Rouse, Jr./Rouse's Septic
Tank to conduct mining activities off NC Highway 24 in Carteret County. The mining
permit (no. 16-69) was issued on February 4, 2011.
North Carolina law allows persons aggrieved by the issuance of a mining permit
to contest the decision by filing a petition for a contested case in the Office of
Administrative Hearings pursuant to N.C.G.S. 150E-23 of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA),
If you believe that you are an aggrieved party within the meaning of the APA, a
petition for a contested case must be filed in the Office of Administrative Hearings
within sixty 60) days of the mailing of this notice to you.
If you file a contested case petition, it must be in writing and in the form
prescribed by N.C. General Statutes 150E-23. File the original petition and one copy
with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-6714.
Any questions about filing a petition may be directed to the Clerk of the Office of
Administrative Hearings by telephoning [phone].
You must serve the Department of Environment and Natural Resources by
mailing a copy of the petition to Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, Registered Agent and
General Counsel, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 Maii
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This notice was mailed on
-rv� &--U
James D. Simons
Director
Division of Land Resources
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural
Resources
Brenda Harris
Mining Program Secretary

5. Floating Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the stormwater discharge where
I is no solids and I is the surface covered with floating solids:
1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9to c) Ps�,L n
6. Suspended Solids
Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in the stormwater discharge
where I is no solids and 10 is extremely muddy:
l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to t-j I 1I
7. Foam
Is there any foam in the storrnwater discharge? Yes No V
8. Oil Sheen
Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? Yes No
9. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater PoQution i j 0 I
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam or oil sheen maybe indicative of pollutant
exposure. These conditions may warrant further invcstigation.
Page 2
S WU-242.101599

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
January 4, 2011
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7008 1300 0000 1124 1114
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
Rouse's Septic Tank
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
RE: Proposed Rouse Borrow Pond
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
We have reviewed the application request you submitted for the referenced mine site.
However, the following information is needed to continue processing your application:
A site visit by Land Quality Section staff on December 21, 2010 revealed that
land disturbing activities have occurred onsite since the last inspection, and that
a ditch had been cut to dewater the previously excavated area. Please note that
NO land disturbing activities may occur at this site without a valid mining permit.
At this time, there is no mining permit for this site. Therefore you must cease all
land disturbing activities as well as any dewatering or discharge. Any further
land disturbing activities may be considered mining without a permit.
Provide proof that the problems noted in the inspection report have been ..
resolved, including the repair of the site such that no dewatering discharge is
able to leave the pit.
2. We are also returning your previously submitted Assignment of Savings Account
No. 3000231400170 for $300.00, in the name of Billy Rouse, Jr. — Wachovia
Bank. The name on the security must be the same as the name appearing on
the application for a mining permit, i.e., Billy Rouse, Jr. - Rouse's Septic Tank
At the present time, we have received no acceptable bond for this site. Please
note the information required for a satisfactory bond as described on the 2nd page
of this letter.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 • Internet:http:llwww.dlr.enr,state,nc.uslpagesllandqualitysection html
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Certified Mail
Mr. Rouse
Page 2
Please note, the Land Quality Section may request additional information, not included
in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
As previously noted, the reclamation bond has been calculated using the information
submitted in the application. The reclamation bond for this site would be $7,000.00. To date,
no completed, original bond has been received by this office. The bond will be required prior
to approval of this application request.
For your convenience, I have enclosed a bond form, an assignment of a savings
account form and irrevocable standby letter of credit form for your use in securing the required
bond. The name on the security must be the same as the name appearing on the application
for a mining permit, i.e., Billy Rouse, Jr. - Rouse's Septic Tank. In addition to one of these
alternatives, you may, upon request, substitute a cash deposit.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information and the bond to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 5B.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not be met and request that
an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made
to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's
files at the end of the 180-day period.

Certified Mail
Mr. Rouse
Page 3
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ova 'j, & o'
Ashley L. -Rodgers
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Bond forms
ASA No. 3000231400170
CC.' Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Mr. Cory Larsen - DWQ
Mr. Jeff Mitchell, Stroud Engineering, P.A., Hestron Plaza Two, 151-A Hwy 24,
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

A7iA.
WCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE.
Director and State Geologist
November 18, 2010
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7008 1300 0000 1124 0889
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
Rouse's Septic Tank
123 Pete' Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
RE: Rouse Borrow Pond
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
Ok6Z � t� �01`i
�Q co
We have reviewed the application request you submitted for the referenced mine site.
However, the following- information is needed to continue processing your application:
Please revise the mining map to identify the purpose of the 10 foot wide section
between the unexcavated buffer line and the excavation limits line within the
permit boundary.
2. Revise the mining map to label and identify the location of the fence to be placed
in that -area. Provide a clear symbol showing the location of the fence inside the
property line.
3. Please clarify the detail labeled "Waste Pile Reclamation and Temporary Berm
Detail" If this detail is meant to be for the stockpiles and wastepiles on site,
please revise to label it as such. If it is meant for temporary berms onsite, please
explain how a 15 foot high berm with 2:1 slopes will fit within the proposed 25
foot unexcavated buffer. Please make sure that a detail/typical cross section is
shown for the stockpiles and wastepiles onsite. A separate detail may be
necessary for the temporary berms onsite.
Please note, the Land Quality Section may request additional information, not included
in this letter, as the mining application review progresses.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Tefephone 919-733-4574 I FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 - Internet:http://www.dIr,enr.state.nc.us/pages/landqualitysection,htmi
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled / 10% Post Consumer Paper

Certified Mail
Mr. Rouse
Page 2
As previously noted, the reclamation bond has been calculated using the information
submitted in the application. The reclamation bond for this site would be $7,000.00. To date,
no completed, original bond has been received by this office. The bond will be required prior
tb approval of this application request.
For your convenience, 1 have Enclosed a bond form, an assignment of a savings
account form and irrevocable standby letter of credit form for your use in securing the required
bond. The name on the security must be the same as the name appearing on the application
for a mining permit, i.e., Billy Rouse, Jr. - Rouse's Septic Tank. In addition to one of these
alternatives, you may, upon request, substitute a cash deposit.
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items listed
above have been fully addressed.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information and the bond to my attention at the following address:
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 58.0013, you are hereby advised that yoLi have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing, to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not be met and request that
an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made
to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently 'in the Department's
files at the end of the 180-day period.

Certified Mail
Mr. Rouse
Page 3
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ashley L. Rodgers
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Bond forms
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Mr. Cory Larsen - DWQ
Mr. Jeff Mitchell, Stroud Engineering, P.A., Hestron Plaza Two, 151-A Hwy 24,
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

f
—i_•%'i_C,CJJn�'�"'� f�.4 � h..% r �l G�t�t ��, �� 4 G-%�
0 �d
�- f—h �►'ut� L! � � 1'� �(Ji'�l�y.l±q p� f_'�'!L�/_f'
aUJZ 7 2010-.
a
wsilancu & a9Roo
Inc�►-
r.

Section "7.1.1— Filtrexx SiltSoxxrm - Sediment & Perimeter Control Technology
•
E
L_J
Ammonium-N
33%
33%
33%
33%
33%
USDA ARS
Removal
Environmental
/
w/NnroLoxxT"
Quality Lab
Motor Oil
96%
96%
96%
96%
96%
Soil Control
Intematio0
Removal
Lab, Inc
Erosion -ontrol'
Assoction, 2006
Diesel Fuel
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Soil Control
Removal
Progress
Progress
Progress
Progress
Progress
Lab, Inc
Gasoline
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Testing in
Soil Control
Removal
Progress
Progress
Progress
Progress
Progress
t.ab, Inc
Iron (Fe)
22%
22%
22%
22%
22%
Soil Contr
Removal
Lab. Inc
7_utc (`/.n)
9%
9%
9%
9%
9%
Soil Control
L•b� Inc
Removal
Manganese (Mn)
8%
8%
8%
8%
8%
4od Control .
Removal
Lab, Inc
Total coliform
67%
67%
67%
67%
67%
USDA ARS
Removal^
Environmental
Quality Lab
E. coli Removal^
67%
67%
67%
67%
67%
USDA ARS
Environmental
6URlily Lab
Enterococcus
47%
47%
47%
47%
47%
USDA ARS
Removal'
Environmental
Qnalit y Lab
E. coli Removal
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
USDA ARS
wI BactoLoxxT"'^
Einvironrnenlal
Quatity Lab
Fecal coiif'orm
980/0
98%
98%
98%
98%
USDA ARS
Removal wl
Environmental
Bactol,oxxT"'A
Quality Lab
Fnterococcus
91 %,
91 %
91 %
91 %
91 %
USDA ARS
Removal w/
Environmental
Sacto LOX\TM^
Quality Lab
Clay (<0.002nim)
65%
65%
65%
65%
65%
USDA ARS
RemovaIg
I:nvironrnental
(Quality Lab
Silt (0.002-
64%
64%
4%
64%
64%
USDA ARS
0.0511un)
Enviumtnenial
Removal#
Qualir. Lab
Other
Inlet Soxx'"
lnlel Soxx
DitchChexx
DitchChexs,
DilchChesx"',
Recommended
Ditchchexx'",
DitchChexx
FilterRing'",
FilterRing1mA
FilterRing",
Uses
Slope
FilterRin
FilterCell"
Filtercell"'
FilterCell-
Niernuption
FillerV1
Filtration
Filtration
Filtration
Soxx"'
Fill on
Ba11lel"
Baille"
BaFlle'"'
132 1M Slope
I erruption
6x�rm
•E3ased on rainfall intensity o/2.5 cm (5 in)Ihr applied to a bare clay loam soil alit 10%sl0pe_ runoti' flow rate of 108
mllsec/linear m (0.52 gpm/li near ft), and mean runoff volume of 230 [Jm' (6.3 gift').
"Functional Longevity isependent on UV exposure, freezelthaw frequency. region of USICanada, runoff sediment
frequency/duration/loading. and adherence to speci lied maintenance requirement.
'Sediment Storagepacity = sediment accumulation behind (directly upslope) * within the device.
'Based on manure treated soils where bare soil control exhibited an average MPN for total coliforni = 2.02X 10"/100 ml,. E. coli.
= 1.72X 10"1100 ni � Enterococcus = 1.43X 10`/100 rill, .
#Based on average runoff -sediment concentrations on 2500 mg/L on a silt loam soil.
trexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240 12

>E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>
>E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Daniel E. Line
NCSU Water Quality Group
Box 7637
Raleigh, NC 27695
919-515-8243 phone
919-515-7448 fax
0
•
6

Section 7.1.1— Filtrexx SiltSoxxT" - Sediment & Perimeter Control
•
•
0
Biological i
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings , 2006
Turbidity
63%
63%
63%
63%
63%
USDA ARS
Filtre, iR Tech Link
Reduction
Environmental
#3308; American
Quality Lab
Society of
gricultural &
iological
r
ngineers Meeting
Proceedin ,2006
TSS Removal
97%
97%
97%
97%
97%
USDA AR
Filtrexx Tech Link
w/PAM
Environ mal
#3308; American
Qualit ab
Society of
Agricultural &
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings , 2006
TSS Removal
97%
97%
97%
97%
97%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Link
w/Bio-FloxxTm
Environmental
03309, American
Quality Lab
Society of
Agricultural &
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings ,2006
Turbidity
98%
98%
98%
98%
8%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Lint:
Reduction
Environmental
#3308; American
w/PAM
Quality Lab
Society of
Agricultural &
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings, 2006
Turbidity
94%
94%
94%
94%
94%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Link
Reduction w/
Environmental
#3308; American
Bio-FloxxTM
Quality Lab
Society of
Agricultural &
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings , 2006
Total Phosphorus
34%
34%
34%
34%
34%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Link
Removal
Environmental
43308; American
Quality Lab
society of
Agricultural &
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedin s, 2006
Reactive
38%
38%
38%
38%
38%
USDA ARS
American Society
Phosphonts
Environmental
of Agricultural
Removal
Quality Lah
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings, 2006
Total Phosphonts
60%
60%
60%
60%
60%
USDA ARS
American Society
Removal w/
Environmental
ol'Agricultural &
PhosLoxxTM
Quality Lab
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedin s , 2006
Reactive
99%
99%
99%
99%
99%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Link
Phosphorus
Environmental
43308; American
Removal wl
Quahly Lab
Society of
PhosLoxxTM
Agricultural &'-
Biological
Engineers Meeting
Proceedings , 2006
Nitrate-N
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
USDA ARS
American Society
Removal
Environmental
of Agricultural &
Quality Lab
Biological
Engineers Mecting
Proceedin s , 2006
Ammonium-lv
15%
15%
15%
15%
15%
USDA ARS
Removal
Environmental
Qual ity Lab
trexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240 11

> another issue that I would like input on from Marine Fisheries,
> Shellfish Sanitation and CHPPs is . . they proposed 1 mgd discharge of
> freshwater to Jumping Run creek (headwaters). Do you think there may
> be an impact to the creek from a discharge of that magnitude? And, one
> other item of concern, there are septic tanks all in that area, it is
.
> residential and pulling groundwater in the tune of 1 mgd for
> discharge, may pull septic tank subsurface discharges toward the pit.
> My comments on the mining permit was that we (DWQ) would prefer wet
> mining techniques to eliminate the need for dewatering all together.
> Apparently that wasn't given much thought since our application is
> requesting dewatering. Let's discuss this one before we move forward
> with permitting, if you all don't mind. We best deal with the issues
> on this one now because once one gets through, it opens the flood
> gates for more.
> THX
> LW
> Larsen, Cory wrote:
> Hi Linda,
> Wanted to collect your comments on Rouse Borrow Pond operation in
> Careret Co. 5 ac sand mine max depth 20 ft bgs, dewatering only. no
> wetlands anticipated. Any reason not to issue this one once/if their
> mining application gets approved? Thanks.
> Cory
> Cory Larsen
> Environmental Engineer
> NCDENR I DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit
> 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
> 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
> North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>--
5

Section 7.1.1— Filtrexx SiltSoxxTM - Sediment & Perimeter Control Tech
•
•
Table 1.3. Filtrexx SiltSoxxTM Performance and Design Specifications Summary.
Design
8 in (200mm)
12 in
18 in
24 in
32 in
'resting Lab/
Puhli tion(s)
Diameter
(308mtm)
(450mm)
(600mm)
(800mm)
Reference
Design &
Performance
Effective Ileight
6.5 in
9.5 in
14.5 in
19 in
26 in
The Ohio State
Transactions of
(160mm)
(240mm)
(360mm)
(480mm)
(650mm)
University, Oho
Agricultural
the American
Society of
Researcf ,t}nd
Agricultural &
Development
Biological
Cent r
fin inters, 2006
Effective
25 in
38 in
57 in
75 in
100 in
Circumference
(630mm)
(960mm)
(1450mm)
(1900mm)
(2500mm)
Density
13 Ibs/ft
32 lbs/ft
67 lbs/ft
133 Ibs/ft
200 NMI
soil Control
(when tilled)
20 kg/m)
50 k m
100 k m
200 k m
(300 k r n
[.ab, Inc
Air Space
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
Soil Control
1.ab. Inc
Maximum
unlimited
unlimited
unlimited
unlimited
unlimited
continuous It:n th
Staking
10 ft (3m)
10 ft (3m)
10 ft (3m)
10 ft (3m)
!10 ft (3m)
Requirement
!
Maintenance
3.25 in
4.75 in
7.25 in
9.5 in �'
13 in
Requirement
(80mm)
(120mm)
(I80mm)
(240mm}
(325ni n)
(sediment
accumulation
removal at X
height)
Initial Maintenance
22 in (55 cm);
32 in (80 cm);
42 in (105 cm);
64 in (l60
86 in (215 cm);
"['Ile University
Requirement based
1 109 L/linear m
1388 Lllinear m
1825 Lllinear m
cm); 2776
3885 Llinear m
of Georgia &
on Rainfall -Runoff°
Lllinear m
Auburn
University
Functional
2— 5 yr
2— 5 yr
2 1yr
2— 5 yr
2— 5 yr
Longevity"
Maximum Slope
600 ft
750 ft
1.600 ft
1300 ft
1650 ft
The Ohio State
Filtrexx Design
Length (<2%)
{ 183m)
(229m)
/(305m)
(396m)
(500m)
University. Ohio
Tool'"", Filtrexx
Agricultural
Library #301,
Research and
Filtrexx Tech Link
Development
#3304 & #331 1
Center
Hydraulic Flow
7.5 gpm/ft
1 1.3 g m/f1
15.0 gpm/ft
22.5 gpm/fI
30.0 gpm/ft
The Ohio State
Filtrexx Tech Link
'Through Rate
(94
(141
(188
(281
(374
Univcrsity, Ohio
43311 & #3313,
Umin/m)
L/min/m)
L/minim)
L/min/m)
L/ntinhn)
Agricultural
Researchand
#3308: American
Society of
Development
Agricultural'&
Center:
Biological
University of
Engineers Meeting
Guelph, School
Proceedings,
of lingineeringl
2006, Second
Watershed
Interagency
Research Group
Conference on
Research in
Watersheds, 2000
P Factor
1-0.32
0.1-0.32
0.1-0.32
0.1-0.32
0.1-0.32
USDA ARS
American Society
(RUS1.1=)
Fnvironmental
of Agricultural Rc
Quality
Biological
Lab/University
Lngineers Meeting
of Gcor is
Proceedings. 2006
Sediment Swrage
174 cu. in
396 cu. in
857 cu. in
1631 cu, in
2647 cu. in
Filtrexx Tech Link
Capacity**
(285011)
(6490cc)
(14040cc)
(26840cc)
(43377 cc)
43314
Total solids
98%
98%
98%
98%
98%
Soil Control
lntemational
Removal
Lab, Inc
Erosion Control
/
Association 2006
Total Suspended
78%
78%
78%
78%
78%
USDA ARS
Filtrexx Tech Link
Solids Removal
Environmental
#3308; American
Quality Lab
Society of
Agricultural &
Filtrexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240 10

> Anne
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> e
> *From:* Linda Willis [[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:27 AM
> *To:* Larsen, Cory
> *Cc:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>; Patti
> Fowler
> *Subject:* Re: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
> Thanks Cory,
>
> I hope the rest will chime in soon. If not, we'll have no choice but
> issue the permit and see how it goes. Bare minimum, we'd need to put
> in the COC that they must sample for fecal and I'd like to see them
> required to send a copy of the monitoring reports to me in the region,
> otherwise it's too easy to lose track of them. We'll need an 0 & M
> plan from them. . so you'd want to state no dewatering can occur until
> we sign off on an approved 0 & M.
> LW
> Larsen, Cory wrote:
> Linda, .
> Looking through the mining permit application again, the permittee is
> proposing a maximum dewatering rate of 1.78 MGD. So even more of a
> concern for stream/septic impacts than at 1 MGD. I will hold on to the
> NCG permit until we reach a conclusion.
> Cory
> *From:* Linda Willis [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:15 AM
> *To:* Larsen, Cory; [e-mail]
><mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>; Patti Fowler
> *Subject:* Re: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
> All,
>
> I had reviewed this application on Feb 20, 09. . DLR sent us a copy of
> the mining application to review. I identified several issues with
> this one.
> The site drains to Jumping Run Creek that serves conditionally
> approved shellfishing waters. Our permit requires fecal coliform
> monitoring if the discharge is to SA waters (which it is in this
> case). There are no limitations for fecal coliform, nor even benchmark
> cutoffs to bring our attention to the issue in the NCG020 permit. We
> will keep this one on our radar and be sure they are doing the
> monitoring they are required to do, if we have to ok a discharge. Now,
4

Section 7.1.1— Filtrexx SiltSox)C' ' - Sediment & Perimeter Control Tech nology
0
•
Table Ll- Filtrexx SoxxTM Material Specifications.
Material Type
3 mil HDPE
5 mil HDPE
5 mil HDPE
Multi -Filament
MuIYFilament
Polypropylene
Po ypropylene
(MFPP)
"SafetySoxxTM"
Material
Photodegradable
Photodegradable
Biodegradable
Photodegradable
Photodegradable
Characteristic
Design
5 in (125mm),
5 in (125mm),
8 in (200mm),
8 in (200mn1 ,
8 in (200mm),
Diameters
8 in (200mm),
8 in (200mm),
12 in (300mm),
12 in (300tnnt),
12 in (300mm),
12 in (300mm),
12 in (300mm),
18 in (400mm),
18 in (4 6mm),
18 in (400mm),
18 in (400mm)
18 in (400mm),
24 in (600mm),
24 in (6DOmm),
24 in (600mm),
24 in (600mm),
32 in (800mm)
32 inf(800mm)
32 in (800mm)
32 in 800mm
Mesh Opening
318 in (IOmm)
3/8 in (10ntm)
3/8 in (10mm)
/3/8 in (IOmm)
1/8 in (3nun)
Tensile Strength
ND
26 psi
26 psi
44 psi
202 psi
(1.83 kglcm2)
(1.83 kg/cm')/
(3.09 kg/cm2)
(14.2 kglcm`)*
% Original
23% at 1000 hr
23% at 1000 hr
ND
100% at 1000 hr
100% at 1000 hr
Strength from
Ultraviolet
Exposure
ASTM G-155)
Functional
6 mo-2 yr
9 tno-3 yr
'6-12 months
1-4 yr
2-5 yr
Longevity/
Project Duration
*Tested at Texas Transportation Institute/Texas A&M University (ASTM 5035-95).
Table 1.2. Filtrexx Pollution Control Practices Use Specifications.
Pollution
Silt$o�s'"
InletSa�s'M
DitchChee��M
ISlopeuption
FilterRing'""
Filter Cell iM
RunolI'Dis•ersion
Control Practice
SoXX,M
filter Baffle"'
Snxs
5 mil I IDPE.
,
5 mil HIRE,
5 mil EIDPE,
5 mil HDPE,
Material Type
M1.i,P•
Salety5oxx M
MFPP,
5 mil HDPE
SafetySoxsTM
MFPP,
MFPP.
Sufe,SozzTM
Satet}'SoxxTM
SafetySoxsTM
SaletySo.\"TM
8 in (200mm),
i2 in (300mm),
8 in (200mm),
12 in (3DUmnt)•
Design Diameter
8 in (200mm),
12 in (300mtit
8 in (2o0mm),
12 in (300mm
12 in (300mm),
18 in (400mm),
8 in (200mm)
i8 in (4o0mm),
12 in (300mm),
18 in (400mm)
18 in l 0(hnm).
24 in (600mm)
24 in (600mm)
Media SNolhcation
FilterMedia'M
FilterMedia'm
FilterMedia'M
FilterMediaTM
FilteTMedia'M
FillerMedia'M
GrowntgMedia"
Itrexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240 9

> *From:* fowler, Patti
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:12 AM
> *To:* Potts, 3
> *Subject:* FW: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746 .
>
> *From:* Linda Willis[mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:17 PM
> *To:* Deaton, Anne
> *Cc:* Larsen, Cory; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> Patti Fowler; Murphey, Trish; Cory Larsen; Bradley Bennett
> *Subject:* Re: Rouse Borrow Pond NCGO20746
> If there are borrow pits there now, and they did dewater, they did so
> without a permit. It may have been done back in the day (before our
> NCG020 was conceived). Anyway, we are going to ask /them/ to determine
> the impacts to that creek. They'll likely have to hire a consultant to
> help them with that. The issue is, we don't have a good way of
> determining the impacts since it would likely take a somewhat
> sophisticated model to do so. We can ask for an operation and
> maintenance plan that will require they demonstrate that their
> discharge will not result in the removal of the creek's function as a
> PNA (although I don't think lumping Run is designated PNA) or affect
> shellfish. We do have one site up in the Snug Harbor area that was
> approved to dewater to Adams Creek Canal (a nondischarge domestic
> wastewater treatment facility). I did manage to get APS to include
> monitoring in the creek to demonstrate impacts. Not sure if we have
> data yet, the plant may not have been built yet. Nonetheless I'm
> afraid we may be comparing apples with oranges there since that canal
> connects two large bodies (Newport River and the Neuse) and won't
> behave like the headwaters to a creek. That situation would provide a
> lot greater flushing than this. Our NCG 020 permit does not require in
> stream monitoring either. I don't know if we can include that for a
> case like this. We'll take it a few steps further and see what
> information we get from them. We can let them know they'll have to
> estimate what the change in salinity would be throughout an entire
> tide cycle. If we can get a number for percent salinity from
> them,could you review that information and give us your comments?
> LW
> Deaton, Anne wrote:
> Linda,
> I agree with Trish's reply. There could be impacts if the salinity is
> altered, or if the dewatering results in increased turbidity or fecal
> coliform levels. Our problem is we don't know how to determine if 1 or
> 1.78 mgd outflow would do this. Are there other dewatering systems
> that have been in place that drain to shellfish waters that we could
> look at to see if there has been a change? Also, is this a new system?
> I went to the site and there are existing old borrow ponds there. Did
> they dewater for that? If they did, was monitoring conducted - that
> could answer our questions. if there are no previous examples of this
> the applicant should be required to conduct wq monitoring (sal, temp, •
> DO, turb, fecal, nutrients) and to begin prior to initiating the new
> operations so change can be assessed.
3

Section'7.1.1—Filtrexx SiltSoxxTM — Sediment & Perimeter Control Technology
CD set for Specifications and Design
'
. Considerations for Filtrexx Products.
Tyler, R.W. 2007. US Patent # 7,226,240
"Devices, Systems and Methods for Controlling
Tyler, R.W., and A. Marks. 2003. Filtrexx
Erosion" Issue date 6-5-07.
Product Installation Guide. Grafton, Ohio.
Tyler, R.W., and A. Marks. 2003. A Guide to
US EPA NPDES Phase 11.2006. Compost Filter
Filtrexx Products. Product Descriptions and
Socks: Construction Site Storm W
Water Runoff
Specifications for Filtrexx Products.
Control. National Menu of BestoManagement
Practices for Construction Sites.
http:l/cfpub.epa. =ov/npdes/stromwater/menuofbm
Tyler, R.W., J. Hoeck, and J. Giles. 2004. Keys to
Ps/consite.cfin
Understanding How to Use Compost and Organic
Matter. IECA Annual Meeting Presentations
published as IECA Digital Education Library,
AllllIT10NAL4NFORMATION
Copyright 2004 Blue Sky Broadcast.
TylerR.W. 2004. International PC'I' Patent
For other references on this topic, including trade
Publication #: WO 2004/002834 A2. Containment
magazine and press coverage, visit the Filtrexx
Systems, Methods and Devices for Controlling
Website at:�
http:////www.filtrexx.coin/resourcespress.htm
Erosion. Patent Application Filed on January 8,
2004.
For included in Appendix,
Tyler, R.W. 2003. International PCT Application
reports not the
frstt.
#: PCTUS2003/020022. Containment Systems,
http://www.filtrexx.comlresourcesreports.htm
Methods and Devices for Controlling Erosion.
Filtrexx International, LLC
Patent Application Filed on June 25, 2003.
Technical Support
. Tyler, R.W. 2003. US Patent Publication 9:
35481 Grafton Eastern Road
2003/003151 1 A1. Devices, Systems and Methods
Grafton, OH 44044
for Controlling Erosion. Patent Application Filed
440-926-
on January 13, 2003
440-926-402 4021 ] (fax)
/
Website: www.filtrexx.com
Tyler, R.W. 2002. US Patent ApplicationEmail:
info@,filtrexx.com
910/208,631. Devices, Systems and Methods for
See Website or call for complete list of
Controlling Erosion. Patent Application Filed on
international installers
July 31, 2001
/
The information contained herein may be subject
Tyler, R.W. 2001. Provisional Patent Application
to confidential intellectual property of Filtrexx®
#601309 ystems and Methods for
054. Devices �'
International, LLC, including but not limited to
Controlling Erosion. Patent Application Filed on
US Patent 7,226,240 or Patents Pendingand is the
July 31, 2001
property ofFiltrexx® International, LLC.
Tyler, R.W. 2001. Filtrexx Product Manual.
Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.
Specifications and Design Considerations for
Filtrexx Products, Grafton, OH.
Filtrexx© is a Registered Trademark of Filtrexx x0
International, LLC.
Tyler, R.W. 1996. Winning the Organics Copyright 2008. Filtrexx international, LLC, all
Game —The Compost Marketers Handbook. rights reserved.
ASHS''ress, ISBN # 0-9615027-2-x..
Filtrexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240 8

> Fax [phone]
> http://www.deh.enr.state.nc.us/shellfish/Water_Monitoring/RWQweb/home.
> htm
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
> North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
>
> to third parties.
> Please note my new email address [e-mail]
> *From:* Larsen, Cory
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2010 2:31 PM
> *To:* Potts, J
> *Cc:* Willis, Linda
> *Subject:* RE: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
> JD,
> Is there a 7Q10 flow for lumping Run that you are familiar with? our
> rules won't allow a wastewater discharge flow of more than 50% 7Q10. I
> suspect it is zero in reality.
>
> Cory Larsen
> Environmental Engineer
>
.
> NCDENR I DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit
>
> 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617,
> 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
> Phone: [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
> North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
> *From:* Potts, J
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:48 AM
> *To:* Larsen, Cory; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> Fowler, Patti; Murphey, Trish; Larsen, Cory; Bennett, Bradley;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* RE: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
> Just as an FYI to everybody. I was involved in a Jump Run Creek water
> quality Study that lasted for a few years. The long term avg. flow of
> JRC at the Hwy 24 culverts is 1.15 MGD. Rouse's flow would basically
> double the flow in the creek during the time of discharge.
>
> JD
2

Section 7.1.1- Filtrexx SiltSoxxTm - Sediment & Perimeter Control Technology
REFERENCES with compost filter socks and silt fence- 2006�
. Faucette, L.B., K. Kerchner, and A. Vick. 2006. American Society of Agricultural and Biological
Sediment Storage Capacity of SiltSoxx7" vs. Silt Engineers Annual International Conference,
Fence. Filtrexx Tech Link 43314 Portland, OR. Paper No. 06XXXX,/r
Faucette, L.B., H. Keener, M Klingman, and K. American Association of State#Highway
Kerchner. 2006. Design Capacity Prediction Tool Transportation Officials. 2003. Standard
for Si]tSoxxTM and Silt Fence. Filtrexx Tech Link Specification for Transportation Materials and
#3313 (Description of Design Tool) and Filtrexx Methods of Sampling and Testing, Designation
Library 4301 (Design Tool) M9-03, Compost for,*Erosion/Sediment Control.
Washington, DC/
Faucette, L.B. 2006. Flow -Through Rate, Design
Height, and Design Capacity of SiltSoxxT,` and
Silt Fence. Filtrexx Tech Link 43304
Faucette, L.B. 2006. Design Height, Flow -
Through Rate, and Slope Spacing of SiltSoxxTI
and Silt Fence. Filtrexx Tech Link #331 1
Faucette, L.B., and R. Tyler. 2006. Organic BMPs
used for Storm Water Management. Proceedings
of the International Erosion Control Association
Annual Conference, Long Beach, CA 2006,
Faucette, B, F. Shields, and K. Kurtz. 2006/
Removing storm water pollutants and determining
relations between hydraulic flow -through rates,
pollutant removal efficiency, and physical
characteristics of compost filter media. Second
Interagency Conference on Research in
Watersheds, 2006 Proceedings�Coweeta
Hydrologic Research Station, NC. Filtrexx Library
#106.
Faucette, B., Sadeghi, A., and K. Sefton. 2006.
USDA ARS - Evaluation of Compost Filter Socks
and Silt Fence in Sediment and Nutrient Reduction
from Runoff. Filtrexx Tech Link 43308
FiFeld, J. 2001.PDesigning for Effective Sediment
and Erosion 5ontroi on Construction Sites.
Forester Press, Santa Barbara, CA.
Keener, H B. Faucette, and M. Klingman. 2006.
Flow -through rates and evaluation of solids
separation of compost filter media vs. silt fence in
sediment control applications. 2006 American
Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
Annual International Conference, Portland, OR.
Paper No. 062060.
Sadhegi, A., K. Sefton, and B. Faucette. 2006..
SSediment and nutrient removal from storm water
Faucette, L.B', A. Vick. 2006. LEED Green
Building Caredits using Filtrexx Organic BMPs.
Filtrexxffech Link #3301
Faucette, L.B. A. Vick, and K. Kerchner. 2006.
Jf
Filtrexx, Compost, Low Impact Development
(LID), and Design Considerations for Storm Water
Management. Filtrexx Tech Link #3306
Faucette L.B., C.F. Jordan, L.M. Risse, M.
Cabrera, D.C. Coleman, and L.T. West. 2005.
Evaluation of Storm Water from Compost and
Conventional Erosion Control Practices in
Construction Activities. Journal of Soil and Water
Conservation. 60:6: 288-297.
Faucette, L.B. 2005. Removal and Degradation of
Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Storm Water with
Compost. Filtrexx Tech Link 43307
Faucette, L.B. 2005. A Comparison of'
Performance and Test Methods of SiltSoxxT"' and
Silt Fence. Filtrexx Tech Link 93302.
Faucette, L.B., N. Strazar, A. Marks. 2006.
Filtrexx Polymer and Flocculent Guide. Filtrexx
Library #601.
Marks, ,A., R. Tyler, and B. Faucette. 2005. The
Filtrexx Library. Digital publication of support
tools for the erosion industry.
www.fiItrexxlibrarv.com.
Marks, A., and R. Tyler. 2003. Filtrexx
International Company Website. Specifications,
CAD drawings, case histories. www.filtrexx.coin
Tyler, R.W., and A. Marks. 2004. Erosion Control
Toolbox CD Kit. A Guide to Filtrexx Products,
Educational Supplement, and Project Videos. 3
Filtrexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual - Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240

Larsen, Co
From: Potts, J
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Larsen, Cory
subJecl: FW: FW: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
Hi Cory,
Please see Dan Line's response below.
Thanks
JD
J. D. Potts
Manager, Recreational water Quality Program Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water
Quality Division of Environmental Health NC DENR
[phone]
Fax [phone]
http://www.deh.enr.state.nc-us/shellfish/Water_Monitoring/RWQweb/home.htm
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Please note my new email address [e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Dan Line fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:34 AM
To: Potts, J
Subject: Re: FW: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
JD: 0
Yes i got the cable thanks. i can always use and extra one.
we monitored JRC at Hwy24 from 12/98 to 9/04 and there were 3 weeks (fall 2001) when Q=
essentially 0 gal according to my records.
Dan
Potts, J wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> Could you help me out on Cory's question below? Did you ever get the
> cable that I sent you?
> J. D. Potts
> Manager, Recreational Water Quality Program
>
> Shellfish Sanitation and Recreational Water Quality
> Division of Environmental Health
> NC DENR •
>
> [phone]
1

Section 7.1.1 — Filtrexx SiltSoxx"m - Sediment & Perimeter Control Technology
•
t
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Advantages
Tubular filtration matrix allows for better
trapping and removal of sediment and soluble
pollutants in storm water runoff compared to
planar constructed sediment control devices (i.e.,
silt fence).
• Greater surface area contact with soil than
typical sediment control devices, reducing
potential for runoff to create rills under the device
leading to unfiltered sediment.
• No trenching is required; therefore soil is
not disturbed upon installation or removal.
• SiltSoxxT"" can be installed year-round in
difficult soil conditions such as frozen or wet
ground, and dense and compacted soils, as long as
stakes can be driven.
• SiltSoxxT" are easily implemented as a
treatment in a greater treatment train approach to
erosion and sediment control.
• Organic matter and humus colloids in
FilterMediZ' (filler material in Si]tSoxxT"') have
the ability to bind and adsorb phosphorus, metals,
and hydrocarbons that may be in storm water
runoff.
• Microorganisms in FilterMediaT" have the
ability to degrade organic pollutants and cycle
captured nutrients in storm water runoff.
• SoxxT"` (the mesli netting containment
system) allows SiltSoxx'm to be placed in areas of
high sheet flow and low concentrated flow. /
• SiltSoxx"' can be direct seeded at time of
application to provide greater stability and/
filtration capability once vegetation is established.
• FilterMediaT" is organic and can be left
on site after permanent stabilization fis complete, to
be used in landscape design and/or seeded and
planted with permanent vegetation.
• FilterMediaT' improves existing soil
structure if spread out and used as a soil
amendment after construction activity is complete.
• Biodegradable or photodegradable
SiltSoxxT"' can be lef�on site after construction
activity eliminating,the need for removal and labor
and disposal costs
• SiltSox/. can be used on slopes to slow
down runoff }'locity, disperse concentrated
runoff, and educe effective slope lengths,
reducing the erosive potential of stormwater
runoYsiltSoxx"
• are less likely to obstruct
wildlife movement and migration than planar/silt
fence sediment control practices.
SiltSoxxT" are available in 8 in.(200mm),
12 in. (300mm), 18 in. (450mm), 24 in. (600mm)„
and 32 in (800mm) diameters for customized
applications and challenging situations.
• SiltSoxxT" are available in 200 ft (61m).
continuous lengths to prevent weak sections and
creation of concentrated flow situ ations"ypicat to
low points in runs of other sediment control
devices. End points are sleeved together to form
continuous runs of unlimited lengths without low
or break points.
• SiltSoxxTM may assist in qualification for
LEED® Green Building Rating and Certification
credits under LEED® New Construction 2.2.
Awarded credits may be possible from SS
Prerequisite 1, SS Credit 5.1, SS Credit 6.2, WE
Credit 2, MR Credit 4.1, MR Credit 4.2, MR
Credit 5.1, MR Credit 5.2, and MR Credit 6.
Note: LEED®tis an independent program offered
through the US Green Building Council. LEED®
credits arerdetermined on a per project basis by an
independent auditing committee. Filtrexx neither
guarantees nor assures LEED® credits from the
use of its products.
Disadvantages
• If filler material of SiitSoxxT"" is not
Certified FilterMedia"', performance may be
diminished.
• If not installed correctly, maintained or
used for a purpose or intention that does not meet
specifications performance may be diminished.
• If land surface is extremely bumpy, rocky,
or changes elevation abruptly ground surface
contact to SiltSoxxT"" may be diminished thereby
adversely effecting performance.
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
SiltSOXXTM use only photodegradabie or
biodegradable SoxxT"" netting materials available
from Filtrexx International, LLC and are the only
mesh materials accepted in creating SillSoxxT"" for
any purpose. For Soxx"' tubular mesh material
specifications see Table 1.1.
FILTERMEDIAT" CHARACTERISTICS
Specifications for SiltSoxxT"" use only Certified
Filtrexx FilterMediaT"' which is a coarse
composted material that is specifically designed
for removal of solids and soluble pollutants from
storm water runoff. FilterMedia'"' can be altered
or customized to target specific pollutants in
runoff as approved by the Engineer or Filtrexx
Filt/exx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0
US Patent 7,226,240 2

15A NCAC 211 A000. Storrnwater management requirements specific to l-IQW are described in 15A 40
NCAC 2H .1006.
(3) Listing of Waters Classified HQW with Specific Actions. Waters classified as HQW with specific actions
to protect exceptional water quality are listed as follows: Thorpe Reservoir [Little Tennessee River Basin,
Index No. 2-79-23-( t)] including all of its tributaries shall be managed with respect to wastewater
discharges through Item (I) of this Rule. ltem (2) of this Rule shall not be applied in association with this
HQW because Of tile local government implementation of WS-Ill stormwater management requirements.
If an applicant objects to the requirements to protect high quality waters and believes degradation is necessary to
accommodate important social and economic development, the applicant may contest these requirements according to the
provisions of G.S. 143-215.1(e) and 15013-23.
Hisloi-v rote: Arrlhorili, G.S. 143-214.1: 143-215.1; 143-215.3(rr)(I);
F.ff. Ocloher 1, 1995;
Amended El,T August 1, 1998: April 1, 1996
1
U
•

. Standard Specifications and Design
I ` Version 7.0
Last Updated: 1-1-08
Section 1: Erosion and Sediment Control — Construction Act
1.1 Filtrexx SiltSoxx"m
Sediment & Perimeter Control Technolo
PURPOSE & DESCRIPTION
Filtrexx SiltSoxxT' are a three-dimensional tubular
sediment control and storm water runoff filtration
device typically used for perimeter control of
sediment and soluble pollutants (such as
phosphorus and petroleum hydrocarbons), on and
around construction activities. Filtrexx SiltSoxxT"'
trap sediment and soluble pollutants by filtering
runoff water as it passes through the matrix of the
SiltSoxxTM and by allowing water to temporarily
pond behind the SiltSoxxT', allowing deposition of
suspended solids. SiltSoxxTM are also used to
reduce runoff flow velocities on sloped surfaces.
APPLICATION
Filtrexx SiltSoxxTM are to be installed down slope
of any disturbed area requiring erosion and
sediment control and filtration of soluble
pollutants from runoff. SiltSoxxTM are effective
when installed perpendicular to sheet orilow
concentrated flow, and in areas that silt fence is
. 1
ADVANTAGES
Manual
vities
Low
Med
}sigh
Installation Difficulty
r
urabili_ry
edim`ent Control
Soluble Pollutant Control`
Runoff Flow Control
Life Cycle Cost
ASHTO & USEPA
PDES Phase 11 Approved
YES
On paved surfaces where trenching of silt
fence is impossible.
normally considered appropriate. Acceptable
SiltSoxxT"' can be applied to areas of high sheet
applications include (Fifield, 2001'):
runoff and erosion, on slopes up to a 1:1 grade
• Site perimeters
(should be used in conjunction with slope
• Above and below disturbed areas subject
stabilization/erosion control technology on slopes
to sheet runoff, interrrill and rill erosion
> 4:1), around inlets, and in other disturbed areas
• Above and below4xposed and erodable
of construction sites requiring sediment control.
slopes
SiltSoxxTM may also be used in sensitive
• Along the toe?of stream and channel banks
environmental areas, where migration of wildlife
• Around area drains or inlets located in a
may be impeded by the use of fences or trenching
`sump' /
may damage roots.
• On compacted soils where trenching of silt
fenc�is difficult or impossible
It is possibie to drive over SiltSoxxTM during
• Around sensitive trees where trenching of
construction (although not recommended),
silt fence is not beneficial for tree survival
however,,these areas should be
or may unnecessarily disturb established
immediately repaired by manually moving
vegetation.
SiltSoxxT"' back into place, if disturbed.
On frozen ground where trenching of silt
Continued heavy construction traffic may destroy
�•
fence is impossible,
the fabric mesh, reduce the dimensions, and
reduce the effectiveness of the SiltSoxxT'
Filtrexx Standard Specifications and Design Manual — Version 7.0 US Patent 7,226,240

15A NCAC 02B .0224 HIGH QUALITY WATERS i
High Quality Waters (HQW) area subset of waters with quality }iigher than the standards and areas described by l 5A NCAC
213.0101(c)(5). Tlie following procedures shall be implemented in order to implement the requirements of Rule .0201(d) of
this Section.
(1) New or expanded wastewater discharges in High Quality Waters shall comply with the following:
(a) Discharges from new single family residences shall be prohibited. Those existing subsurface
systems for single family residences which fail and must discharge shall install a septic tank, dual
or recirculating sand filters, disinfection and step aeration.
(b) All new NNPDES wastewater discharges (except single family residences) shall be required to
provide the treatment described below:
(i) Oxygen Consuming Wastes: Effluent limitations shall be as follows: BOD;= 5 mg/l,
NH,-N = 2 rng/l and DO = 6 mg/l. Vlore stringent limitations shall be set, if necessary.
to ensure that the cumulative pollutant discharge of oxygen-consumin' wastes shall not
cause the DO of the receiving water to drop more than 0.5 nig/l below background
levels, and in no case below the standard. Where background information is not readily
available, evaluations shall assume a percent saturation deterniined by staff to be
generally applicable to that hydroenvironment.
(ii) Total Suspended Solids: Discharges of total suspended solids (TSS) shall be limited to
effluent concentrations of 10 mg/1 for trout waters and PNA's, and to 20 lit for all
other High Quality Waters.
(iii) Disinfection: Alternative methods to chlorination shall be required for discharges to
trout streams, except that single family residences may use chlorination if other options
are not economically feasible. Domestic discharges are prohibited to SA waters.
(iv) Emergency Requirements: Failsafe treatment designs shall be employed. including
stand-by power capability for entire treatment works, dual train design for all treatment
components, or equivalent failsafe treatment designs.
Qv))Volume: The total VOIntnC of treated wastewater for all discharges combined shall not
exceed 50 percent of the total instream flow under 7Q 10 conditions. •
(vi) Nutrients: Where nutrient overenrichnient is projected to be a concern. appropriate
effluent limitations shall be set for phosphorus or nitrogen, or both.
(vii) Toxic substances: 1n cases where complex wastes (those containing or potentially
containing toxicants) may be present in a discharge, a safety factor shall be applied to
any chemical or whole effluent toxicity allocation. The limit for a specific chemical
constituent shall be allocated at one-half of the normal standard at design conditions,
Whole effluent toxicity shall be allocated to protect for chronic toxicity at an effluent
concentration equal to twice that which is acceptable under design conditions. lit all
instances there may be no acute toxicity in an effluent concentration of 90 percent.
Ammonia toxicity shall be evaluated according to EPA guidelines promulgated in
"Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - 1984"; EPA document number
440/5-85-001; NITS number PB85-2271 14; July 29, 1985 (50 FR 30784) or "Ambient
Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia (Saltwater) - 1989"; EPA document number
44015-88-004; NTIS number P1389-169825. This material related to ammonia toxicity is
hereby incorporated by reference including any subsequent amendments and editions
and is available for inspection at the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Library, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies ruay be obtained
fi-om the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,
Virginia 22161 at a cost of forty-seven dollars ($47.00).
(c) All expanded NPDES wastewater discharges in High Quality linters shall be required to provide
the treatment described in Sub -Item (l )(b) of this Rule, except for those existing discharges which
expand with no increase in permitted pollutant loading.
(2) Development activities which require an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan in accordance with rules
established by the NC Sedimentation Control Commission or local erosion and sedimentation control
program approved in accordance with 15A NCAC 4B .021 S. and which drain to and are within one mile of
High Quality Waters (HQW) shall be required to follow the stormwater management rules as specified in

Page] of 3
•
Search
Home ' Products Agencies & Specs Case Studies Videos Fri
Conlaci US For:
spec tnterprctation
Product Application
Pricing cC Availability
Proclucl Comparison
(,900) 518-2291)
(51 3)?71-4420 fax
in fn(ri:usfahricsinc.cc>m
Product Browser
Find a specific US Fabrics'
product
- Choose -
Geotextiles By Category
Not sure where to start?
Choose a category to help
Onarrow your search.
- Choose -
1-1
Home — Products — Other Products Filter Bags — US Filter B;
Create PDF Create Fax
US Filter Bags
Geotextile Filter Bag
US FilterBags'are designed to collect'silt'and sediment from pumped water and are ideal for construction site
dewatering applications. To begin dewatering, simply cut and pening into the bag, insert the discharge hose and
secure the connection with a clamp, tie or tape. US Filter Bags are made from a nonwoven, needlepunched,
polypropylene geotextile that meets the following M.A.R.V values except where noted:
Equivalent Products Search
Fill
Find a US Fabrics' Product
r
Equivalent
Select an Option
Y
PROPERTY
Weight - Typical
Ten5il strength
Geotextile Applications
Elongation @ Break
Select an application to better
Mullen Burst
understand how our products
Puncture Strength
function.
CBR Puncture
- Choose -
Trapezoidal Tear
Apparent Opening Size
Permittivity
Helpful References
Water Flow Rate
Design and Installation help,
UV Resistance @ 500 Hours
packaging info, support
literature
ROLL SIZE
- Choose - :;
i s, x 10'
1 5' x l 5'
TEST METHOD
ENGLISH
METRIC
ASTM D-S261
8 oz/sy
271 glsm
ASTM D-4632
205 Ibs
912 N
ASTM D-4632
50%
SO%
ASTM D-3796
350 psi
2,413 kPa
ASTM D-4833
120 Ibs
534 N
ASTM D-6241
535 Ibs
• 2,381 N
ASTM D-4S33
85 Ibs
378 N
ASTM D-4751
80 US Sieve
0,180 mm
ASTM D-4491
1.35 Sec-1
1.35 Sec-1
ASTM D-4491
90 g/min/sf
3,657 I/min/sm
ASTM D-4355
70%
70%
AREA
WEIGHT
17 sys
20 Ibs
25 Sys
30 Ibs
The above information is to the best of our knowledge accurate. but it is not intended to be considered a guarantee. Any implied warranty
for a particular use or purpose is excluded. If the product does not meet the above properties, and notice is given to US Fabrics, Inc., the
product will be replaced or refunded (5/2010),
6/ 18/2010

15A NCAC 02B .0221 TIDAL SALT WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CLASS $A WATERS
The following water quality standards apply to surface waters that are used for shellfishing for market purposes and are
classified SA. Water quality standards applicable to Class SC and SB waters as described in Rule .0220 and Rule .0222
of this Section also apply to Class SA waters.
(1) Best Usage of Waters: shellfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by the "SB" or
"Sc" classification;
(2) Conditions Related to Best Usage: waters shall meet the current sanitary and bacteriological standards
as adopted by the Commission for Public Health and shall be suitable for shellfish culture. Any source
Of water pollution which precludes any of these uses. including their functioning as P1vAs. on either a
short-term or a long-terni basis shall be considered to be violating a water quality standard:
(;) ty Standards applicable to Class SA Waters:
(aj Floating solids, settleable solids, or sludge deposits: none attributable to sewage, industrial
wastes or other wastes:
(b) Sewage: none;
(c) Industrial wastes, or other wastes: none shall be allowed that are not effectively treated to
the satisfaction of the Commission in accordance with the requirements of the Division of
Environmental Health;
(d) Organisms of coliform group: fecal colifonn group not to exceed a median MF of 141100 nil
and not more than 10 percent of the samples shall exceed an MF count of431100 nil in those
areas most probably exposed to fecal contamination during the most unfavorable
hydrographic and pollution conditions.
HisloryNole: Azrthorio,G.S. 143-214.1; I43-213.3(ci)(1);
Eff. October 1, 1995;
.dmemlcl Gff. ,IfgY 1, 2007.
•
E

STROUD ENGINEERING. P.A. LETTER •
Hestron Plaza Two
151-A Hwy. 24
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557 V `
l DATE JOB NO.
as �o was-
(252) `247-7479 ATTENTION
,TO 41C ' ' �`' Q iz S Rs
1
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via-
0 Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
O
following items:
❑ Samples, ❑ Specifications
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
kiwi
` �
� • r � t •
* V •
THESE ARE TR SMITTED as checked below:
For proval ❑ Approved as submitted
F For your use ❑ Approved as noted
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections
❑ For review and comment ❑
I>•7iil� 3IIl�Y1>fi�I
REMARKS
❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ Return corrected prints
❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

7

4i
��/�r&J-
PA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Duality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
July 28, 2010
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Natural Resources
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Request for Additional Information
Rouse Borrow Pond, COC No. NCGO20746
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Rouse:
DWQ staff received a copy of your letter of intent to wet mine the Rouse Borrow Pond site from the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) on July 15, 2010 and began to process your stormwater application as such. During this
review, a couple of items were identified that require your attention before an NPDES can be issued as follows:
1. Page 3 of 7 of the Notice of Intent must be revised to reflect the new mining process.
Specifically, question 8 must be revised to show no mine dewatering and should include the
proposed stormwater discharge points (if any). Please revise the attached copy and return to
my attention at DWQ.
2. Please add a note to the mining plan stating that, "no wetlands exist within the permitted
boundary" and remove the words, "to subsurface area" from the dewatering note. Please return
two revised copies of the plan to my attention at DWQ.
if you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Cory sen
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Unit
� '
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
DLR, Ashley Rodgers
Stroud Engineering, PA, Jeff Mitchell, [e-mail]
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
On
N rthCarolina
�l a1mrallil
North Carolina Division of WatavQuality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet, www,ncwaterqualit .ur iaicution; 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affinative Action Employer-100°% Recycle,&30% Post Consumer Paper

NCG020000 N.O.J.
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industriai
activity at this facility
SIC Code: �`0' 1 4 `f Z
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals misted at this facility: SAND
8) Discharge Points:
Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property):
Stormwater: Mine dewatering: 1 Process Wastewater Overflow:
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan.
Please provide short narrative description of discharges: Ground water dischar ed into
a sediment basin that is 45'x 75'x 5' and then into a existing ditch
on the ro ert . -
9) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in? Jumping Run
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
Receiving water classification (it known): SA tKW
Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-11 to WS-V or SA must
be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage
under NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of process wastewater are
permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or freshwater ORW.
.1x A'11
10) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
❑ No
❑ Yes If yes, please provide information about any 404/401 Certification permits.
Note: Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement an Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the Division.
The O&M Plan should be submitted to the Regional Office and must be approved prior to operation.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance.
11) Dot=s.thiis facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)?
C" 6 (it not, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: Applied for on 1.-26- 09 )
C Yes 6vtkfT RP �g('4ez 0(b pf 10
If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number and include a copy with your application: 16 r6 1
Note: DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCGO20000 General Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or
renewed by the Division of Land Resources (DLR).
Page 3 of 7
SW U-217-071408
Last revised 7/14108

*;A
�®®�p�+
UM
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of WF.tFir Quality
Beverly Epives Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Gover^dt Director
July 28, 2010
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Natural Resources
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Request for Additional Information
Rouse Borrow Pond, COC No. NCG020746
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Rouse:
DWQ staff received a copy of your letter of intent to wet mine the Rouse Borrow Pond site from the Division of
Land Resources (DLR) on July 15, 2010 and began.to process your stormwater application as such. During this
review, a couple of items were identified that require your attention before an NPDES can be issued as follows:
Page 3 of 7 of the Notice of Intent must be revised to reflect the new mining process.
Specifically, question 8 must be revised to show no mine dewatering and should include the
proposed stormwater discharge points (if any). Please revise the attached copy and return to
my attention at DWQ.
Please add a note to the mining plan stating that, "no wetlands exist within the permitted
boundary" and remove the words, ".to subsurface area" from the dewatering note. Please return
two revised copies of the plan to my attention at DWQ.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Cor? sen
Environmental Engineer
stormwater Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
DLR, Ashley Rodgers
Stroud Engineering, PA, Jeff Mitchell, [e-mail]
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Fifes
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone]
ll tcrnet: www.ncwatcrnualitv.ork Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
No�r`tltCarolina
wrrrrunrI f
Customer Service
1-877-623-6749
An Equal Opportunily/Affirmative Action Employer-100% Recycled130% Post Consumer Paper

� 7tLz � r0
S.
'0 o/to
� e ^-gAb4o

Rouse's Septic Tank Service Inc.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
In reference to our conversation on 07-13-2010. Yes, I wish to proceed with the request
to wet mining the excavation area and also that no discharge will occur from the site and
there will be no pumping of the pit.
Billy Rouse J.
Rouse Septic Tank In.
?iS2- 2, 1 . 10 8 0
Jul_ , . ;SIti 1

AILF-VA
'ri-la
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
7008 1300 0000 1127 4877
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
RE: Rouse Borrow Pond
Carteret County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Govemor
July 9, 2010 Dee Freeman, Secretary
JUL - 8 2010
DENR - WATER W
We have reviewed the application request you submitted for the referenced mine site.
However, the following information is needed to continue processing your application:
1. If you wish to proceed with your request to wetmine the area, please send us a
letter signed by you confirming:
a. that you will only be wetmining the excavation area
b. that no discharge will occur from the site
C. that there will be no pumping of the pit (please note that if you choose to
wetmine, there will be a permit condition that no dewatering is allowed)
2. if you choose the second alternative proposed by DWQ in their letter to you
dated June 30, 2010 (enclosed), please note that this will require (at a minimum):
a. Six new copies of the revised mine maps and application to be routed for
agency reviews again
b. New notifications of adjoining landowners and the county manager
C. New land entry agreements for all land to be covered under the permit
d. Calculations showing that the pond chosen to receive pumped water from
the excavation area has the capacity to handle the volume necessary to
ensure no discharge
e. Satisfactory response to all DWQ issues and requests made in their
June 30, 2010 letter including proof that you have provided them with an
approvable O&M plan
1612 I%Aaii Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 • Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Saiisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 - Intemet:httpalwww.dlr.enr.slate.nc.uslpagesllandquaiilysection.html
�n rquai Opportunity !Affirmative Action =, poloyer - 50% Recyclea 130% Post Consumer Paper

Certified Mail
Mr. Rouse
Page 2
Please be advised that our review cannot be completed until all of the items
listed above have been fully addressed. In addition, please note the Land Quality Section may
request additional information, not included in this letter, as the mining application review
progresses.
In order to complete the processing of your application, please forward two (2) copies of
the requested information to my attention at the following address -
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
As required by 15A NCAC 513.0013, you are hereby advised that you have 180 days
from the date of your receipt of this letter to submit all of the requested information. If you are
unable to meet this deadline and wish to request additional time, you must submit information,
in writing. 'to the Director clearly indicating why the deadline can not be met and request that
an extension of time be granted. If an extension of time is not granted, a decision will be made
to grant or deny the mining permit based upon the information currently in the Department's
files at the end of the 180-day period.
Though the preceding statement cites the maximum time limit for your response, we
encourage you to provide the additional information requested by this letter as soon as
possible. Your prompt response will help us to complete processing your application sooner.
Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ashley L. Rodgers
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Cory Larsen (DWQ) letter dated June 30, 2010
cc: Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Mr. Cory Larsen - DWQ
Mr. Jeff Mitchell, Stroud Engineering, P.A., Hestron Plaza Two, 151-A Hwy 24,
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557

�.'� ter.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Ea,les Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
June 30, 2010
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Rouse Borrow Pond, NCG020746
Carteret County
Dear Mr, 1kcuse7
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Division of'Nater Quality (DWQ) staff from the Central and Wilmington Regional Offices had the opportunity to
visit the sucject site on June 15, 2010 and discuss some of the potential permitting alternatives as w0 as clear
your concerns from a mining and ownership standpoint. As was explained during the visit, a new wastewater
discharge resulting from mine dewatering cannot be permitted to Jumping Run based on its classification as a
SA (Market Shellfishing, Salt Water); HQW (High Quality Water) surface 'water.
After viewing the site layout and discussing alternatives more thoroughly, it appears that two options remain
from a per-„itting perspective. The first alternative to conventional mining with a dewatering discharge from
the pit to Jum, ping Run is to wet mine the site as was recommended in our'larch 1, 2010 letter. It was noted
that the reia.ively small size of the mining area (-- 2.5 ac) may limit the,feasibility of this option.
A second alternative could include utilizing surrounding ponds (former'mining pits) to contain and infiltrate some
volume of ;.eti:atering wastewater from the proposed minF site. It was observed that Rouse Mine (NCG020547)
has been reclaimed as an approximately nine acre pond with some storage volume available as freeboard.
Additi,:naily, the unpermitted pit adjacent to the site appeared to have potential to provide limited storage
volume: In order for DWQ to approve this type or activity, a thorough and detailed Operation & Maintenance
Pumping Plan (Plan) will be necessary to ensure that Jumping Run receives no dewatering wastewater
discharges. At a minimum, the Plan must contain the following elements:
• ' Current surface elevations of the pond(s) and groundwater table and a means of instantaneous
measurement of both (ex. monitoring gages and wells);
• Infiltration potential for each pond;
Total surface area draining to the pond(s);
Outlet structure elevations;
Freeboard gage installed in pond(s) and minimum level of freeboard required to allow
dewatering (TBD);
• Daily inspection log of freeboard levels;
• Pump capacity and pump logs showing daily pump run times and daily calculated flow;
• Calculations of the volume of water expected in the pit from groundwater inflow;
• Calculations of the radius of influence for pumping operations at the proposed mine bottom;
• Calculations of pond elevation changes for storms ranging from 1" to the 25-yr, 24-hr storm;
• Site plan showing the mine site with all the required details imposed by DLR, the area around
the site (all residences shown with septic system locations), drainage system (ditches),
�nnhC:irolina
-1 �rtrrrrrl��
„ra{fan+Tll.: '.i.uuI(it,WaIwi-Quali1v It, I�M:lilS��IAiYCcIlm. ,`:C276t.l-i;E' Plinnckul`ol 11-tloo Cu>tonwr .^:icc
Inlc ncl: nl•...'.— _n iclu_ilin�, Lncau,on: = I: `. Sah:.bmu -Jl. iLil i ks, NC 27nii-: F;u ")10) Su'-u-:0S 1-\77-o':-o7-a

A 4 a
C®ENR .
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Pete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Director
June 30, 2010
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Rouse Borrow Pond, NCG020746
Carteret County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) staff from the Central and Wilmington Regional Offices had the opportunity to
visit the subject site on June 15, 2010 and discuss some of the potential permitting alternatives as well as hear
your concerns from a mining and ownership standpoint. As was explained during the visit, a new wastewater
discharge resulting from mine dewatering cannot be permitted to Jumping Run based on its classification as a
SA (Market Shellfishing, Salt Water); HQW (High Quality Water) surface water.
After viewing the site layout and discussing alternatives more thoroughly, it appears that two options remain
from a permitting perspective. The first alternative to conventional mining with a dewatering discharge from
the pit to Jumping Run is to wet mine the site as was recommended in otir March 1, 2010 letter. It was noted
that the relatively small size of the mining area 2.5 ac) may limit the feasibility of this option.
A second alternative could include utilizing surrounding ponds (former mining pits) to contain and infiltrate some
volume of dewatering wastewater from the proposed mine site. It was observed that Rouse Mine (NCG020547)
has been reclaimed as an approximately nine acre pond with some storage volume available as freeboard.
Additionally, the unpermitted pit adjacent to the site appeared,to have potential to provide limited storage
volume. In order for DWQ to approve this type of activity, a thorough and detailed Operation & Maintenance
Pumping Plan (Plan) will be necessary to ensure that Jumping Run receives no dewatering wastewater
discharges. At a minimum, the Plan must contain the following elements:
• Current surface elevations of the pond(s) and groundwater table and a means of instantaneous
measurement of both (ex. monitoring gages and wells);
Infiltration potential for each pond;
• Total surface area draining to the pond(s);
• Outlet structure elevations;
• Freeboard gage installed in pond(s) and minimum level of freeboard required to allow
dewatering (TBD);
• Daily inspection log of freeboard levels;
• Pump capacity and pump logs showing daily pump run times and daily calculated flow;
• Calculations of the volume of water expected in the pit from groundwater inflow;
• Calculations of the radius of influence for pumping operations at the proposed mine bottom;
Calculations of pond elevation changes for storms ranging from 1" to the 25-yr, 24-hr storm;
• Site plan showing the mine site with all the required details imposed by DLR, the area around
the site (all residences shown with septic system locations), drainage system (ditches),
On
No thCarolina
Aaturtr!!y
]North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.new:nerauality.ora. Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer —100% Recycled130% Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Billy Rouse, -Jr.
Rouse Borrow Pond �
June 30, 2010
appropriate buffers, roads, receiving stream, wetlands, all existing ponds as well as the pond(s)
proposed to be utilized for dewatering purposes; }
• Specifications for any settling basins used for TSS removal;
• Narrative of how the volume of stormwater falling within the pit will be managed for dewatering
purposes;
• Narrative of how adequate treatment of runoff falling outside of the pit will be provided before
conveyance to perimeter ditches;
Written requirement to discontinue all pumping during rain events or when the minimum
freeboard elevation (TBD) has been reached;
Written permission that allows DWQ?'staff access to the site at any time during business hours to
conduct site inspections; and a
Proposed sampling schedule and locations to comply with the analytical monitoring
requirements of NCG020000.
In general, the Plan must demonstrate how dewatering practices are to be performed without creating a
discharge to Jumping Run or nuisance conditions to the surrounding properties or other negative impacts.
Additionally, modification of the mining permit with DLR must be made to expand the permit boundary to
include any ponds used for dewatering.
Please notify DWQ staff by August 2, 2010 of which alternative you wish to pursue or the application may be
returned as incomplete. If you.have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at
[phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
tr_�e_
Co a
Environmental Engineer
Stormwater Permitting Unit
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
Division of Land Resources - Mining Program, Ashley Rodgers
Central Files '
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files

Larsen, Cory
From: Willis, Linda
sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 11:07 AM
To: Larsen, Cory; Bennett, Bradley; Rodgers, Ashley
Cc: Shiver, Rick; Sams, Dan; Wehner, Judy; Worthington, Paul
Subject: Rouse Pit NCG020746
Sirs and Ms. Rodgers,
I had the opportunity to visit with Paul (DLR WiRO) concerning this mine. Basically what I discussed with Paul is covered
in this email. The DLR Mining permit for the pit associated with NPDES Permit NCGO20547 has been officially closed by
DLR. Cory and I went to the site on the 1514, to look at how the area drains to consider what type of alternatives Rouse
has that can be utilized on site to ensure no surface water discharge from pit dewatering. I told Paul I would send an
email and include he and Ashley/Judy so they are all in the know on how we are attempting to proceed on the proposed
mine concerning Rouse's request to utilize dewatering.
I'll try to explain the situation there as best as I can and Cory can chime in with his opinion and observations. .
They have a 9 acre pond that has connectivity to a network of ditches and a pond that ultimately discharge to Jumping
Run. The discharge pipe from the 9 acre pond is below ground level maybe a foot from the surface. The pipe is
probably 16-18" in diameter. The water level in the 9 acre pond was probably 10" to a foot below the bottom of the
pipe. The issues with using the 9 acre pond is that he would have to maintain a freeboard (including rain inputs) that
would ensure the pond level is maintained below the bottom of the discharge pipe. He could change the design of the
outlet pipe to include an upturned elbow to give him a higher elevation of the outlet pipe versus pond level. They also
have an unpermitted pit they dug adjacent and parallel to the property they want to mine. This pit is approximately 75
yards long and maybe 25-30' wide, If they propose using that too, we can either have them pipe the outlet pipe from
that pond to the 9 acre pond. Do we want them to demonstrate they can handle all dewatering using the smaller pit.
Here are my recommendations for what needs to be considered and if accepted by DWQ, implemented in an 0 & M:
Elevations of surface of pond, distance to the groundwater table, surface area that drains to the pond(s),
elevation of the outlet structure, pump capacity, means to measure freeboard in ponds, pump logs showing
daily pump run times and daily calculated flow, daily inspection of freeboard levels, infiltration potential for
each pond, calculations for the amount of water expected in the pit from the inflow of groundwater,
requirement to discontinue all pumping during rain events or when the freeboard elevation specified by DWQ
has been reached, we can have them calculate what the elevation change in the pond would be for a 4", 6", 8"
and 10" rain so that they and we know what to expect concerning pond levels when rain events occur (and help
us determine what a reasonable freeboard should be). If he utilizes any pre settling basins for TSS he'll need to
i give us the specifications on that, we'll need to know how he is managing stormwater that falls within the pit
boundaries and he'll need to account for that volume of water generated during rain events into his pumping
plan for dewatering. If he chooses to keep stormwater out of the pit, how will he provide adequate treatment
of runoff before it is conveyed to perimeter ditches, map showing the mine site with all the required details
imposed by DLR, the area around the site (residents), drainage system (ditches), appropriate buffers, roads,
receiving stream, wetlands, all existing ponds as well as the ponds they propose to utilize for dewatering
purposes. I want to see permission given in the 0 & M that allows DWQ staff access to the site at any time
during business hours to conduct site inspections.
Mr. Rouse has history with mining without permits and he was NOT compliant with our NCG020 for pit 547. He did no
monitoring required by NCG020547. So.. more regional oversight (by us and DLR) for this new proposed mine will be
necessary. Paul had notified Rouse to discontinue digging in the elongated hole he dug adjacent to the mine site (on
someone else's property). When I showed Paul the pictures we took on the 15"', he said it looked like he had dug the
hole bigger after he was told to stop digging, provide adequate slopes and stabilize. Perhaps the bigger hole was his
attempt to provide the appropriate slope, or the pictures are deceiving. At any rate, the proposed site will likely get
quarterly inspections to ensure no discharge is occurring if we decide to accommodate his need to dewater. I will
certainly have to commit more time to compliance for this one.

I did check on Jumping Run shellfish area and it has been conditionally opened recently. So, we need to be certain no
discharge from mine dewatering occurs. As a matter of fact, I spoke with Shellfish Sanitation and they indicated there
were times in the past, that Jumping Run had unusually high Fecal when no rain events had occurred. I wouldn't be a
bit surprised that Rouse's dewatering was the source of this problem.
One concerning issue I see with allowing dewatering to the existing ponds without allowing a discharge is the potential
for flooding in the area when heavy rains hit. Can we ensure our requirements of no discharge will not cause problems
with flooding in the area? Can we do that through freeboard management?
Please feel free to provide Cory and I with input. If you feel we're going down the wrong road here, please share your
thoughts. This one will be tricky and we really need some good guidance for Rouse so he can determine if the
constraints he'll be under is worth trying to dewater. He does have the option of wet mining. What I don't support is
forcing a square peg into a round hole. If this isn't feasible when all is said and done. ..then wet mining is the
technology he has to utilize if he wants to mine there. Rouse's concern is he doesn't want to pay his consultant a ton of
$ and not get anything in return. His pit is only 5 acres in size and the area he proposed digging was only 2.5 acres.
Seems like a lot of work for everyone for such a small pit. Rouse feels he can make $200,000.00 selling the sand from
2.5 acres. If that's true, I'm in the wrong line of work.
Linda

Larsen, C1
From:
Sent:
To:
subject:
Attachments:
Cory,
i
Willis, Linda
Friday. June 18, 2010 10;56 AM
Larsen, Cory
Rouse pits
rouse 14.jpg; Rouse 15.jpg; Rouse 1O.jpg; Rouse 17,jpg; Rouse 18.jpg; Rouse tg.jpg
You should have 19 pics total.
Things to consider:
1. Can we allow them to use the old mine pit (NCG020547) to -discharge -water to, from the proposed 2.5 acre,pit?
The old reclaimed pit is.connected to Jumping Run via corrugated discharge pipe through a network of ditches.
That pit is approximately 9 acres, it had"maybee 2.0' freeboard MAYBE (assumption/guesstimate). , that provides
close to 3 MG storage. .
We don't know infiltration rates for the pond, elevation difference between groundwater table (pond surface
elevation) and discharge pipe. *.
2. We don't know how much water the new 2.5 acre pit will generate.. they want to dig down to 20'. douse says'
groundwater will be hit at 10', looks more like the groundwater is somewhere around 1.5-2 feet down (note the
water levels,in the pictures of.existing ponds and ditches).' Using 2.5 acres and whole that generates
groundwater 5' down (big assumption) .. they may generate up to 800,000 gpd from the hole once it's `
approaching the 15' mark.
3. There's another pond (150' by 25') that may give them some storage (100,000 gallons to 150,000 gallons).
Again, we don't know the infiltration rate given the groundwater table elevations.
4. Any proposal they come up with will include the use of pits outside their current DLR mine pit' permit boundary.
. so they'll need a modification there.
5. They will need to provide oversight to dewatering at,all times, they can't just turn on the pumps and walkaway.
otherwise we'll have nuisance conditions generated and potential discharges to surface waters. They will likely
need to maintain a certain freeboard in the ponds they discharge to (provided they are approved to utilize those
ponds) so -that we'don't have to make them plug theoutlet pipes. ,
6. Significant rains could raise the groundwater table and influence any number we try to crunch based on the
assumptions made today.
7. Nuisance conditions have to be considered since•this pit is in a residential area (about 20 home owners in the
vicinity).
They will need to have a pretty solid 0 & M plan that defines when they need to discontinue. the dewatering activity.
Their pump is cabable of dewatering at a rate of 500-900 gpm depending upon whether the impellerneeds
replacement. .
That's a rate of anywhere from 700,000 gpd to 1.3 MGD.
We asked the question if a 2.5 acre site is worth going after considering the constraints he will likely be under. We didn't
seem to think so. We told him -he may find himself unable to dewater if we get into an active rainy season, that did not
seem to bother him either. �•. , '
Linda

STRGUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
Hestron Plaza Two
151-A Hwy. 24
MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
' ' 5
�(►252) 247-7479
'To
Ala �t'S
4t 1
t).C. �'��o`q
LETTER OF tRANSMITTAL
DATE JOB NO.
ATTENTION
RE: 1
�f3 t . r ��► (��
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
j❑ Shop diawings
❑ Copy of letter
Prints Plans ❑ Samples El
❑ Change order Cl
COPIES
©
DATE
/ �
NO.
DESCRIPTION
� . 1 � � 1. � � • I
11 Ili IN
THESE ARESMITTED as checked below:
Fpproval ❑Approved as submitted EI Resubmit copies for approval
ur use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
J As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
SIGNED:
1) enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify u at once.

Y.z�.ro
c * '
L.IN t, (( d,-e c�
PW
NQ F A 4r l
s G, �
noc-r�r '. I
�i
7 0 c9
tef-L1.6- ro
W
btla /,J",I,
�t
rtis C7, S `1�� r

b��f~r�wW 6
IL
1�Sr7i Gcr�-a✓s / 0
STIA
L
F,pt, (vyr t ot-,4-
/�'

Environment and Natural. Resources
Purchase & Services
t Insurance and Risk Management Guide '
- SECTION NO: B
1 PAGE NO: B3
EFFECTIVE DATE 1/01
SUBJECT: POLICY
Commercial Property, Casualty, and General Liability
Insbrance covering potential loss or damage to,ENR operations or assets, and potential liability to_,
others for occurrences" for which the Department may be held legally responsible is administered by
Purchase & Services. 'Examples of such insurance include fire and extended coverage on buildings and
state-owned contents, motor vehicle liability, excess liability, burglary and robbery, employee honesty bond,
"all-risk" (or open perils) coverage on property; accident, and special short-term_ coverage for special events:
Safety and Security

Larsen, Cory
From: Potts, J
Sent: Wednesday, May 20. 2W9 948 AM
To: Larsen, Cory, anne.deato &cmall.net; rich. carpenter@ncmail,rel; Fowler, Palli; Murphey, Trish; Larsen, Cory; Bennett, Bradley; andy,haines@Pcdenrgov;
shannon,jennkins@ncdenr pov
Subject: RE: House Borrow Pond NCG02C746
Just as an FYI to everybody. I was involved in a Jump Run Creek water quality study that lasted for a few years. The long
term avg. flow of JRC at the Hwy 24 culverts is 1.15 MGD. Rouse's flow would basically double the flow in the creek
during the time of discharge.
JD
From: Fowler, Patti
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Potts, J
Subject: FW: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
From: Linda Willis[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:17 PM
To: Deaton, Anne
Cc: Larsen, Cory; [e-mail]; rich, carpenter@ncmai1,net; Patti Fowler; Murphey, Trish; Cory Larsen;
Bradley Bennett
Subject: Re: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
If there are borrow pits there now, and they did dewater, they did so without a pen -nit. It may have been done
back in the day (before our NCG020 was conceived). Anyway, we are going to ask them to determine the
impacts to that creek. They'll likely have to hire a consultant to help them with that. The issue is, we don't have
a good way of determining the impacts since it would likely take a somewhat sophisticated model to do so. We
can ask for an operation and maintenance plan that will require they demonstrate that their discharge will not
result in the removal of the creek's function as a PNA (although 1 don't think Jumping Run is designated PNA)
or affect shellfish. We do have one site up in the Snug Harbor area that was approved to dewater to Adams
Creek Canal (a nondischarge domestic wastewater treatment facility). 1 did manage to get APS to include
monitoring in the creek to demonstrate impacts. Not sure if we have data yet, the plant may not have been built
yet. Nonetheless I'm afraid we may be comparing apples with oranges there since that canal connects two large
bodies (Newport River and the Neuse) and won't behave like the headwaters to a creek.. That situation would
provide a lot greater flushing than this. Our NCG 020 permit does not require in stream monitoring either. 1
don't know if we can include that for a case like this. We'll take it a few steps further and see what information
we get from them. We can let them know they'll have to estimate what the change in salinity would be
throughout an entire tide cycle. If we can get a number for percent salinity from them,could you review that
information and give us your comments?
LW
Deaton, Anne wrote:
Linda,
I agree with Trish's reply. There could be impacts if the salinity is altered, or if the dewatering results in increased
turbidity or fecal coliform levels. Our problem is we don't know how to determine if 1 or 1.78 mgd outflow would do
this. Are there other dewatering systems that have been in" place that drain to shellfish waters that we could look at to
see if there has been a change? Also, is this a new system? I went to the site and there are existing old borrow ponds
there. Did they dewater for that? If they did, was monitoring conducted - that could answer our questions, If there are
no previous examples of this the applicant should be required to conduct wq monitoring (sal, temp, DO, turb, fecal,
nutrients) and to begin prior to initiating the new operations so change can be assessed.

PROCESS/MINE DEWATERING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Please Mail Original and One Copy to Mailing Address Below
Part A: Facility Information
Samples Collected in Quarter:
Certificate of Coverage No.
Facility Natne
Facility Contact
Facility Contact Phone No.
GENLHAL PEIZMIT NO. NCG020000
IQ 20Q)� 40 (all samples shall he reported within 30 days following monitoring period)
(Citcle One)
NCG020135 County of Facility
BESSEMER CITY QUARRY Name of Laboratory
JIMMY HAT71 Lab Certification #
[phone]
Par? P: Process lVastewater and Aline Wastewater Monitoring Requirements
Ct�.i `�C�J'�►I
PACE ANALYTICAL-_,;
12
CD
1 ki7
Date
"50050 ? -v
OD400 ,
=� 04530"
;;00'076
00545,
r_
Number
Stream Name.-
:Satnple Collected
iDatly Fine !
pH
Total Suspended Solids'
Turbidity
-Settleable Saltds°
zRecetvtng -.
a
molddl5r
ill nit
ii�gll' .t
N_IUs
tl l�;
I
,MGD -=
- p
001
UT of 1-ong Creek
9/9/09
0.58
6.90
6.4
ND
002
UT of I -on, Creek
(No Discharge)
t Measured continuously using a nav measuring device or estimated using manufacturer's pump curves and pump logs.
Part C: Certification
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violation."
'I 10/26/09
(Signature of Permitee) (Date)
PartD; rtlailingAddress
Attn: Central Files, DENR, N.C. Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
S W U-244-012005
Y

Anne
From: Linda Willis [Linda.WillisO)ncmai1.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Larsen, Cory
Cc: [e-mail]; rich. carpenter Cancmail.net; Patti Fowler
Subject: fie: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
Thanks Cory,
1 hope the rest will chime in soon. If not, we'll have no choice but issue the permit and see how it goes. Bare
minimum, we'd need to put in the COC that they must sample for fecal and I'd like to see them required to send
a copy of the monitoring reports to me in the region, otherwise it's too easy to lose track of them. We'll need an
O & M plan from them.. so you'd want to state no dewatering can occur until we sign off on an approved O &
M.
LW
Larsen, Cory wrote:
Linda,
Looking through the mining permit application again, the permittee is proposing a maximum dewatering rate of 1.78
MGD. So even more of a concern for stream/septic impacts than at 1 MGD. I will hold on to the NCG permit until we
reach a conclusion.
Cory
From: Linda Willis[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 9:15 AM
To: Larsen, Cory; anne.deatonCincmail.net; rich. carpenterCancmai1.net; Patti Fowler
Subject: Re: Rouse Borrow Pond NCG020746
El
I had reviewed this application on Feb 20, 09.. DLR sent us a copy of the mining application to review. I
identified several issues with this one. .
The site drains to Jumping Run Creek that serves conditionally approved shellfishing waters. Our permit
requires fecal coliform monitoring if the discharge is to SA waters (which it is in this case). There are no
limitations for fecal coliform, nor even bencluuark cutoffs to bring our attention to the issue in the NCG020
permit. We will keep this one on our radar and be sure they are doing the monitoring they are required to do, if
we have to ok a discharge. Now,'another issue that 1 would like input on from Marine Fisheries, Shellfish
Sanitation and CHPPs is .. they proposed 1 mgd discharge of freshwater to Jumping Run creek (headwaters).
Do you think there may be an impact to the creek from a discharge of that magnitude? And, one other item of
concern, there are septic tanks all in that area, it is residential and pulling groundwater in the tune of 1 mgd for
discharge, may pull septic tank subsurface discharges toward the pit.
My comments on the mining permit was that we (DWQ) would prefer wet mining techniques to eliminate the
need for dewatering all together. Apparently that wasn't given much thought since our application is requesting
dewatering. Let's discuss this one before we move forward with permitting, if you all don't mind. We best deal
with the issues on this one now because once one gets through, it opens the flood gates for more.
THX

PROCESS/MINE DEWATERING WASTEWATER DISCHARGE+' MONITORING REI'ORT (I)MR)
Please Mail Original and One Copy to Mailing Address Below
Part A: Facility It formation
Samples Collected in Quarter:
Certificate of Coverage No.
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
2 /3 4 (all samples shall be reported within 30 days following monitoring period)
NCG020170
Facility Name ROCKY RIVER QUARRY
Facility Contact TOM NEELY
Facility Contact Phone No. [phone]
Part B: Process Wasteivater and XIine I!Vastewater Honitoring Requirements
County of Facility
CABARIZUS
Name of Laboratory
PACE; ANAL,y�T-ICKII?+ T
Lab Certification #
12°`�
00530
� 00076
OOa S
Suspe�ided'SoEtds`
Turbidity
"Seitleabie;Sol lds
7'0-Utfall
"��-
CatJ
00�00
Y t 3
_ e _,�
.:.v
-' "T �
'T8:<
Number
v: i:. -..a
Rece itig Stream 1Van e �I
Sample Collected
Daily Floe .
- �
pH
t Dial
x v
- a .e
/dd/
�'� m rl]_. �
N fUs
l
.�„
.;movr =
aNIGb
glln3t,
. _ �': �
nl]
001
UT of Pee Dee
8/10/09
0.14
7.50
1-0
ND
l Measured continuously using a flow measuring device or estimated using manufacturer's purnp curves and pump logs.
Part C: Certification
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are A nifi pant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violation."
/Z l 0/26/09
(Signature/of Permitee) (Date)
Part D; A-lailing Address
Atin: Central Files, DFNR, N.C. Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 276994617
SWU-244-012005

LW
Larsen, Cory wrote:
Hi Linda,
Wanted to collect your comments on Rouse Borrow Pond operation in Careret Co. 5 ac sand mine max depth
20 tit bgs, dewatering only. no wetlands anticipated. Any reason not to issue this one once/if their mining
application gets approved? Thanks.
Cory
Cory Larsen
Environinental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ E Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
ha
3

P110CESS/MINE DEWATERING WASTEWATER llISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
Part.4: FacilityItforniatimi
Samples Collected in Quarter:
Certificate of Coverage No.
Facility Name
Facility Contact
Facility Contact Phone No.
Please Mail Original and One Cope to Mailing; Address Below
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
l /3 . 2 (all samples shall be reported within 30 days following monitoring pperic
('rca One) .
NCG020106
PEE DEE QUARRY
DEXTER 'PATE
[phone]
Part B: Process Ii'astewater and Miiie 13'asteivaler Monitoring Requirements
County of Facilit
Name of. tory
Lab Certifictn #
ANSON
PACE ANALYTICAI_''-
12 ©
�¢
r
iJ1
�. sr
_,s
"
-.Settleable
~Number
Recety in : Stream Narne .�
Sam ple. Collected
,
IDaily Flow.)
pl{,
x Potiil Suspended Sohds
,-Turbidity
Soltds
unittnl1
�,�
moldtlf r
,IbiC;D
,
001
Pee Dee River
(Not in Operation)
1 Measured continuous)}' using a flotti• measuring device or estimated using manufacturer's pump curves and pump logs.
Part C: Certification
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. [lased on iffy inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsihle for gathering the information, the information suhmitted is, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of tines and imprisonment for knowing violation."
10/26/09
(Signature of Permitee) (Date)
fart D; Afailing,4ddress
Attn. Central Files, DEN1I, N.C. Division of Water Quality, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1617
SWU-244-012005

,
M��{r �t„•G�,. 1 {, ^ •ti t. 1. F. r s+., � Nkhaa�
�i � ��� tub. tw . ,�: � t. � x i, ,, ��'�.,, + ' 4i7• � ,i� �.� ! �' '��/{ •� �4
a.Cl :J►
��.�;'��. `� .a `}��- ! ` .I-' ��.af t ,�7i?O_.. � r�i} �, �+ �F •�1'�� ��r �F"a a6 _, ��4U Q _ �
�;�!�t ° f� � �,� � j f' � to YAP -� A` [,Y + + ��, � ` '�y�6t" l � �•��fi�j!ylr -_ % t 1��}J�t" �� � r�". ".
�lj�!'��y.>•i,, � � ! �v-�s�"�Y� 34*J378,�-76.8825 t';, �,+!•:: � a •r '�y,r �. � b' � ('+ , C
.�� it I' �' ]�� L,.: �, I�r '•�` �.4' �.'f� dr' '-iIC��' •��• •�
�;:�J,� � f _ F�. 'r� �. 7( 1 \4� i• F'' �o.t ��� ,.+,rid . • 1 .�,
�'� � � I ? � 1. ��'.1�^ ��� � :�4� /.r �l• A� .rj
lid�i
��' t }, ♦ �' 1 rs���',.�F�' it "�. . � . - .r!r�t� ,7,s � � Y' {1�: -��y �rjSi% j ' K t ii:
—Aid r
�.i'l j�� � ,p� `` j'y � O u © b, n � 1..... •}'+"L�� � '+ -� i�°'�' y,y�� L�'+',•', �i Kr�' � � �� � � t
�h � ,/rj,' `�' � ,� 1 � r TML F !s�7»,f� � Y� .,.r It �a•'� e•,
�' �r'H � } ` � I: '��'/ �.. f �/ 'l, ..I `'y{ •'},+-yF1�(J�. �1.' !' �jr�i.�i �� _+
F� i� i � �'r1 J CI �L �u r t ���Vnrl3 �J ' + � •;� F�x h. � .), u' '��ii : 1_�Z��, .gip �{�] �� •.
T' ° � � ' �• a` i tr"�� ��:�Irf,S ,� �#; S.. ��� Q � @ S $ i , � � "fir � � ,[� �'�v fr'~ -
J j�•''i'� t' ,� .F, h fiN `J' 1 �' I. . y � r� •.{,-w1'� - ✓ ` 1'Y •. � 'y �" "[ � r�
a�'i:Flp
,
lug
43
. iSJ � ��� 'y � yynn �." i-�^.. ii" a .J ii f%% J • �. �fi '_'� r [[�
� ` � ✓k ' �, ti t„�ty� cy ' � i� Mvtiyf •l ` t _ . �,�. '` .. r. � � 8 i
;� /` � •"off .'. � ,��� �,� �?. � w r� r*� << �� � c r, :_ � £�-•
+� •�, i ¢ , Ima o ;2610 DI italGlabu f e -. 20 /00{t�(10
imaporCCY„„D"ato: Au9�I2B?F2oC8 34.44'04.70' N;� 7B'52'45.23' W' fulnv 0111�~ i'+ Z EYo,all 57,70 It

ANE-Uh
ANY
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 1, 2010
Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
123 Fete Road
Newport, North Carolina 28570
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Rouse Borrow Pond, NCG020746
Carteret County
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Division of Water Quality's StormwateriPermitting Unit received a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit application for Rouse Borrow Pond on January 29, 2009. The application indicated that the
mining permit application submitted to the Division of Land Resources (DLR) was still in review but recently it was
noted that a draft mining permit was issued January 28,2010. Issuance of an NPDES permit is contingent upon
issuance of an associated mining permit from DLR, thus the delay in review of your NPDES stormwater application.
A preliminary review has determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed
to continue the stormwater review:
The receiving stream for Rouse Borrow Pond, Jumping Run (Index No. 20-36-9), is classified as a SA; HQW
water 4r.: per 15A NCAC 02B .0224, the total volume of treated wastewater to HQW waters shall not
exceed 50 percent of the total instream flow under 7Q1C conditions. 7Q10 is defined as the minimum
average flow for a period of seven consecutive days that has an average recurrence of once in ten years.
Based on historical steam flow data and jumping Run's limited drainage area, the 7Q10 flow is estimated
to be zero.
As such, the proposed wastewater discharge from the pit via dewatering cannot be permitted, and DWQ
recommends the use of wet mining techniques to eliminate the need for a wastewater discharge. Please
note that stormwater-only point -source discharges from the mining operation are allowed and will be
covered under the NPDES permit.
DWQ recommends that the mining permit be modified to implement wet mining techniques and exclude
mine dewatering practices. Please revise the application and plans as appropriate and submit copies to
DLR and DWQ for approval.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received by this Office prior to April 12, 2010, or the application may be returned as incomplete.
The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
Please reference COC No. NCG020746 on all correspondence. If you have any questions concerning this
matter feel free to contact me at [phone] or [e-mail].
I
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 011C 1
Phi 919-807-63001 FAX: [phone] Customer Service. 1 •$77-623-6748 i v Ul- h Cw-o 1111 a
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org An Equal Opporlunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer A/h a{ F y� rr
YIy

Mr. Billy Rouse, Jr.
Rouse Borrow Pond—NCG 020746 I
March 1, 2010
Sincerely,
I
I
I
Cory L sen
Environmental Engineer
i
cc:. Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
Division of Land Resources - Mining Program, Judy Wehner
Division of Land Resources - Mining Program, Ashley Rodgers
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files I
I
j
1617 Mai! Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 011c
Phone: [phone] FAK 919-807-64921 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 North Caro l i n a
Internet: wvnv.nLwvaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Alfirmalive Action Employer

�AA
T' Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
. d
NCDENRNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
rnrn'JYMr.'[T VRNal.Rw. RI.'IO.iRerb
NCG020000
NOTICE OF INTENT
FOR AGENCY USG ONLY
Date Received
Ycar
I Month
Day
Ccrtincate t'Covcra�c
N I CIG 10 1 g 10
Check H 1 Amotnl
p �J
Permit Assigned m
rsor.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000:
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The following activities are also included:
• Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate
products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations;
• Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations;
• Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or
• Mine dewatering (wastewater)
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
• Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining;
• Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from asphalt
operations and/or concrete operations;
• Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and
• Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
• NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NGS000150
The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000:
• Point source discharges of stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (i.e., sand
dredging or dipping operations)
For new mining sites that require an authorization to construct (ATC) wastewater treatment facilities: This
NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATC for new wastewater treatment facilities. ATC requests must be
submitted at least 90 days prior to construction'.
For existing mining sites that require an Authorization to Operate (ATO) wastewater treatment facilities:
This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATO for wastewater treatment facilities in place.
Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components at an existing site requires
an ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG020000, the ATC request may be submitted without an NOI).
Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or recycle process wastewater (even if commingled
with stormwater) at mining sites will require an ATC prior to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138.
Please see the NCG020000 General Permit for details about which treatment facilities require an
ATC (summarized in Table 1 at the end of this form). For example, an ATC is required for treatment
of mine dewatering discharge from clay pits and non -closed -loop wastewater recycle systems. The
authorization to construct or continue to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of
Coverage (COC) for the NCG02 permit. Design of treatment facilities must comply with requirements
of I5A NCAC 2H .0138 & .0139.
Page 1 of 7 .
'Asper 15A NGAC 2H .0106
2Unless treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to
perform such work for their respective companies in accordance with General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed
and sealed by a P.E.
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7/14/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATC/ATO requirements in the NCG02 permit
at new or existing mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed
and sealed by a Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staff2 along with this application. A copy of the
design calculations should be included. Please see questions 18 & 19.
Table 1: Wastewater Permit ATCIATO Requirements
Mine Dewaterin�
9
Yes
No
Quarries
--
•
Sand Pits
—
•
Clay Pits
♦
Any Dewatering with Chemical Treatment
♦
—
Prodess wastewater _
Sand/Gravel
—
•
Closed -Loop Recycle
—
•
Other Recycle
•
—
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area. (See page 7)
(Please print or type)
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed):
Name
Street Address
City
Telephone No.
E-mail Address
_Billy Rouse
123Pete Road
Newport
252 726-6761
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address
City
County
Telephone No.
Contact E-mail
Rouse Borrow Pond
Billy Rouse Jr.
123 Pete Road
State NC ZIP Code 2857025
Fax :
Newport State NC ZIP Code 28570
Carteret
252 726-6761 Fax:
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). From Hwy 24 east turn on Pete Rd. North
strait back to the end of Pete Rd. this is the proposed mine site
4) Latitude 76 .52' 57 .28w Longitude 34 .44' 16 .38N(degrees, minutes, seconds)
5) This NPDES Permit NOI Application applies to which of the following:
® New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin TBD
❑ Existing
1 ❑ New Permit not applicable - ATC request only. NPDES Permit Number
Page 2 of 7
'1 SWU-217-071408
Last revised 7/14/08

NCG020000 N.O.f.
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Cade: —� A 4 2
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: SAND
8) Discharge Points:
Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property):
Stormwater: 1 Mine dewatering-. NA Process Wastewater Overflow: NA
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan.
Please provide short narrative description of discharges: Surface Storm water runoff
of the entire property will be treated by means of sheet flow
and col into existia2- ditch which surrounds property,
9) Receiving waters:
What is the narne of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in? Jumping Run
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
Receiving water classification (if known): SA; HQW STATE STORMWATER E-XE-,w+Tt-DJ
Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-II to WS-V or SA must
be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. If DEH does not approve, coverage
under NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of process wastewater are
permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-I or freshwater ORW.
10) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
X No
❑ Yes If yes, please provide information about any 404/401 Certification permits.
Note: Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement an Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the Division.
The O&M Plan should be submitted to the Regional Office and must be approved prior toleration.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring Io demonstrate compliance.
11) Does this facility already have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)?
129 No (If not, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: App lied for on 1-26-09
❑ Yes yvt P D n-*T--r• 16 — 6 9
If yes, please provide the Mining Permit number and include a copy with your application:
Note: DWQ cannot issue a COC for the NCGO20000 General Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or
renewed by the Division of Land Resources (DLR).
Page 3 of 7
5WU-217-071408 Last revised 7/14108

NCG020000 N.O.I.
12) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
IN No
❑ Yes
13) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
14) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
15) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
3 No
❑ Yes
If yes, please briefly describe:
16) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
IN No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
17) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility?
®No ❑Yes
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
s
18) Will mine dewatering discharges occur? (ATCIATO required for clay pits or dewatering with chem. treatment)
IN No ❑ Yes
19) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur? (ATC or ATO required,
unless sand/gravel mining or closed -loop recycle system)
IN No ❑ Yes
If yes, answer the following questions on the wastewater treatment system:
a. Please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process wastewater. Give
design specifics (i.e. design volume, retention time, surface area, etc.). Existing treatment
facilities should be described in detail, and design criteria or operational data should be provided
(including calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General
Permit. [Use separate sheet(s)]
b. Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the
chemical additive NA
Note: Please see http://h2e.enr.state.nc.us/ws/PAMS list.htm for a list of approved polyacrylamide (PAMS)
products for use in North Carolina.
Page 4 of 7
SWU-217-071408 last revised 7114/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
c. Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event?
IN No ❑ Yes
20) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
Lf No ❑ Yes If so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design
requirements for treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.)
21) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility a Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
E4 No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
IN No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
0 No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste: NA
How is material stored: NA
Where is material stored: NA
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor: _
Vendor address: NA
NA
22) Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (1) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
{Environmental Management) Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit:
1. 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid
mining permit must be attached to this request.
2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore.
3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate
protection so as to contain all spills on the site.
4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules
governing solid waste disposal.
5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to
not result in contamination of the surface or ground waters.
Page 5 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7114/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit.
certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Billy Rouse Jr.
Title: Mine Manager
-O`! 1/26/09
(Signat e of Applicant) V(Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to NCDENR.
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
❑ Check for $100 made payable to NCDENR
❑ This completed application and all supporting documents
❑ Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status
❑ Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads
❑ Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc.
❑ Copy of mining site plan with all wetlands clearly delineated
❑ If the mine is near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface water or groundwater, contact the regional
office about an O&M Plan (contact information on the next page). Please refer to this 0&M Plan checklist:
✓ Site map with wetlands, ditches, well -placements, borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater
controls/BMPs, vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins, product process areas, and access roads.
✓ Well information (design, depths, maintenance)
✓ Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas
✓ Settling pond sizing information, if applicable
✓ Level spreader design, if applicable
✓ Details about dewatering method
✓ Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding
❑ If an ATC or ATO is required, three (3) sets of plans, specifications, and design calculations, signed,
sealed, and dated by a P.E. ATC and ATO requirements in NCG02000 are summarized in Table 1 on
Page 2 of this NOI (see the permit text for more details). Plans shall show all pertinent design features,
including the location of the outfall(s). If stormwater is flowing off -site, the plan must show that stormwater
will not be mixed with wastewater.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
Page 6 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7114108

—Vt
NCDENR
w�,� w.�,rr, t:•�...,M�n
Fnv� vrr:�i Nin NSVISM. Rrso�ncri.
NOTICE OF INTENT
Division of Water Quality / Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NCG020000
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Rcceived
Year
N4onth
Day
0 9
0+
7-17
Cenificate orCoverage
oAmount
Check 4
Permit Assigned to
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System application for coverage under General Permit
NCG020000:
STORMWATER DISCHARGES associated with activities classified as:
SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Code - 14XX Mineral Mining Industry (except as specified below)
The following activities are also included:
• Active or inactive mining operations (including borrow pits —except for NCDOT borrow pits) that discharge
stormwater contaminated with or that has come in contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate
products, finished products, byproducts or waste products located on the site of such operations;
• Stormwater from vehicle maintenance activities at mining operations;
• Overflow from facilities that recycle process wastewater; and/or
• Mine dewatering (wastewater)
The following activities are specifically excluded from coverage under this General Permit:
• Stormwater discharges associated with peat mining, coal mining, and metal mining;
• Stormwater discharges from mining operations which are intermixed on site with stormwater from asphalt
operations and/or concrete operations;
• Stormwater discharges associated with oil and gas extraction operations; and
• Stormwater discharges associated with tourist gem mines
• NCDOT borrow pits are covered under NCS000150
The following discharges are covered by NPDES general permit NCG520000 instead of NCG020000:
• Point source discharges of Stormwater and wastewater from in -stream sand mining operations (i.e., sand
dredging or dipping operations)
For new mining sites that require an authorization to construct (ATC) wastewater. treatment facilities: This
NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATC for new wastewater treatment facilities. ATC requests must be
submitted at least 90 days prior to construction'.
For existincr mining sites that require an Authorization to Operate (ATO) wastewater treatment facilities:
This NOI is also an APPLICATION FOR an ATO for wastewater treatment facilities in place.
Construction, modification, or installation of any new treatment components at an existina site requires
an ATC. (If the site is already covered by NCG020000, the ATC request may be submitted without an NOI).
Some wastewater treatment facilities used to treat or recycle process wastewater (even if commingled
with stormwater) at mining sites will require an ATC prior to construction per 15A NCAC 2H .0138.
Please see the NCG020000 General Permit for details about which treatment facilities require an
ATC (summarized in Table .1 at the end of this form). For example, an ATC is required for treatment
of mine dewatering discharge from clay pits and non -closed -loop wastewater recycle systems. The
authorization to construct or continue to operate will be issued at the same time as the Certificate of
Coverage (COC) for the NCG02 permit. Design of treatment facilities must comply with requirements
of 15A NCAC 2H .0138 & .01,39.
Page 1 of 7
As per 15A NCAC 2H .0106
2Unless treatment facilities are designed, constructed, and put into operation by employees internal to the company who are qualified to
perform such work for their respective companies in accordance with General Statutes, 89C-25 (7), plans and specifications must be signed
and sealed by a P.E.
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7114108

NCG020000 N.O.I.
Construction of wastewater treatment facilities subject to the ATC/ATO requirements in the NCG02 permit
at new or existing mining sites requires submission of three (3) sets of plans and specifications signed
and sealed by a Professional Engineer (P.E.) or qualified staff along with this application. A copy of the
design calculations should be included. Please see questions 18 & 19.
Table 1: Wastewater Permit ATC/ATO Requirements
.. r„� ... U.
Yes
No
Quarries
—
•
Sand Pits
—
6
Clay Pits
Any Dewatering with Chemical Treatment
—
4,ME P,rocess{lNas_te Ater
Sand/Gravel
—
6
Closed -Loop Recycle
—
6
Other Recycle
6
—
For questions, please contact the DWO Regional Office for your area. (See page 7)
(Please print or type)
1) Mailing address of owner/operator (address to which all permit correspondence will be mailed:
Name Billy Rouse
Street Address 123Pete Road
City Newport State NC ZIP Code 28570:_:
Telephone No. 252 726-6761 Fax:
E-mail Address
2) Location of facility producing discharge:
Facility Name Rouse Borrow Pond
Facility Contact Billy Rouse Jr.
Street Address 123 Pete Road
City Newport State NC ZIP Code 28570
County Carteret
Telephone No. 252 726-6761 Fax:
Contact E-mail
3) Physical Location Information:
Please provide a narrative description of how to get to the facility (use street names, state road numbers, and
distance and direction from a roadway intersection). From Hwy 24 east turn on Pete Rd. North
strait back to the end of Pete Rd. this is the proposed mine site
4) Latitude 76 . 52 ' 57 .2 8w Longitude 34 . 44 ' 16 . 3 8N(degrees, minutes, seconds)
5) This NPDES Permit NOI Application applies to which of the following:
® New or Proposed Facility Date operation is to begin TBD
Cl Existing
❑ New Permit not applicable —ATC request only. NPDES Permit Number
Page 2 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7l14108

-'.7- a-
NCG020000 N.O.I.
6) Standard Industrial Classification:
Provide the 4 digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) that describes the primary industrial
activity at this facility
SIC Code: -L 1 4 2
7) Provide a narrative description of the types of minerals mined at this facility: , SAND
8) Discharge Points:
Number of discharge points (ditches, pipes, channels, etc. that convey discharges from the property):
Stormwater: 1 Mine dewatering: NA Process Wastewater Overflow: NA
Discharge points should be clearly marked on the submitted site plan.
Please provide short narrative description of discharges: Surface Storm water runoff
of the entire property will be treated by means of sheet flow
_and collected into existing ditch which surrounds roperty.
9) Receiving waters:
What is the name of the body or bodies of water (creek, stream, river, lake, etc.) that the facility stormwater
and/or wastewater discharges end up in? _Jumping Run
If the site stormwater discharges to a separate storm sewer system, name the operator of the separate storm
sewer system (e.g. City of Raleigh municipal storm sewer).
Receiving water classification (if known). SA; HQW STATE STORMWATER IFY-FPvprFt
Note: Discharge of process wastewater to receiving waters classified as WS-11 to WS-V or SA must
be approved by the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Health. if DEH does not approve, coverage
under NCG020000 cannot be granted. No new discharges of process wastewater are
permitted in receiving waters classified as WS-1 or freshwater ORW.
10) Will mining operations require dewatering near wetlands or impact any stream, groundwater, or wetlands?
K No
❑ Yes If yes, please provide information about any 404/401 Certification permits.
Note: Wetlands must be CLEARLY DELINEATED on the site plan. Mine dewatering activities that have
the potential to drain wetlands or otherwise impact surface water or groundwater MUST develop and
implement an Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan that has been approved by the Division.
The O&M Plan should be submitted to the Regional Office and must be approveddpriorNation.
The plan shall include, but is not limited to: (1) Groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the
effect of pumping and to establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce impacts, and (2) Detailed
plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance.
11) Does this facility already'have a valid Mining Permit from the Division of Land Resources (DLR)?
129 No (!f not, please indicate the status of the Mining Permit application: Applied for on 1-26-09
❑ Yes A4P b1y4f,- J
if yes, please provide the Mining Permit number and include a copy with your application: + 6 `" C1
Note: DINO cannot issue a COC for the NCGO20000 General Permit until a Mining Permit is issued or
renewed by the Division of Land Resources (OLR).
Page 3 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7/14/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
12) Will this mining operation precede development activities at this site?
0 No
❑ Yes
13) Does this facility have any other NPDES permits?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current NPDES permits for this facility:
14) Does this facility have any Non -Discharge permits (ex: recycle permits)?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, list the permit numbers for all current Non -Discharge permits for this facility:
1
15) Does this facility employ any best management practices for stormwater control?
❑ No
❑ Yes
If yes, please briefly describe:
16) Does this facility have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
® No
❑ Yes
If yes, when was it implemented?
17) Will vehicle maintenance activities occur at this facility?
M No ❑ Yes
Wastewater Treatment Facilities:
18) Will mine dewatering discharges occur? (ATC/ATO required for clay pits or dewatering with chem. treatment)
® No ❑ Yes
19) Will discharges of overflows from process wastewater treatment systems occur? (ATC or ATO required,
unless sand/gravel mining or closed -loop recycle system)
13 No ❑ Yes
If yes, answer the following questions on the wastewater treatment system:
a. Please describe the type of process used to treat and/or recycle the process wastewater. Give
design specifics (i.e. design volume, retention time, surface area, etc.). Existing treatment
facilities should be described in detail, and design criteria or operational data should be provided
(including calculations) to ensure that the facility can comply with requirements of the General
Permit. [Use separate sheet(s)]
b. Does this facility employ chemical additives to flocculate suspended solids? ❑ No ❑ Yes
If yes, please state the name, manufacturer and the quantity of average daily usage of the
chemical additive NA
Note: Please see http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ws/PAMS list.htm for a list of approved polyacrylamide (PAMS)
products for use in North Carolina.
Page 4 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7/14/08

NCG020000 N.Q.I.
C. Does this facility overflow only during rainfall events exceeding the 10-yr, 24-hr rainfall event?
129 No ❑ Yes
20) Are wastewater treatment facilities (including recycle systems) planned in the 100-year flood plain?
EN No ❑ Yes If so, include information to demonstrate protection from flooding. (Minimum design
requirements for treatment works include protection from the 100-year flood, per 15A NCAC 2H .0219.)
21) Hazardous Waste:
a) Is this facility Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility?
1� No ❑ Yes
b) Is this facility a Small Quantity Generator (less than 1000 kg. of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
IN No ❑ Yes
c) Is this facility a Large Quantity Generator (1000 kg. or more of hazardous waste generated per month) of
hazardous waste?
IN No ❑ Yes
d) If you answered yes to questions b. or c., please provide the following information:
Type(s) of waste: NA
How is material stored: NA
Where is material stored: NA
How many disposal shipments per year:
Name of transport 1 disposal vendor: _
Vendor address: NA
NA
22) Certification: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 b (i) provides that:
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any appllcation, record, reporl, plan, or other
document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false
statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly
renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the
[Environmental Management] Commission Implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to
exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
I hereby request coverage under the referenced General Permit. I understand that coverage under this permit
will constitute the permit requirements for the discharge(s) and is enforceable in the same manner as an
individual permit.
I agree to abide by the following as a part of coverage under this General Permit:
1. 1 agree to abide by the approved Mining Permit for this mining activity. (A copy of the valid
mining permit must be attached to this request.
2. 1 agree to not discharge any sanitary wastewater from this mining activity except under the
provisions of another NPDES permit specifically issued therefore.
3. 1 agree that bulk storage of petroleum products and other chemicals shall have adequate
protection so as to contain all spills on the site.
4. 1 agree that solid wastes will be disposed of in accordance with N.C. statutes and rules
governing solid waste disposal.
5. 1 agree that maintenance activities for vehicles and heavy equipment will be performed so as to
not result in contamination of the surface or ground waters.
Page 5 of 7
5WU-217-071408 Last revised 7114/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
I agree to abide by the provisions as listed above and recognize that the provisions are to be considered as
enforceable requirements of the General Permit.
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Printed Name of Person Signing: Billy Rouse Jr.
Title: Mine Manager
- Ol 1/26/09
(Signat e of Applicant) (Date Signed)
Notice of Intent must be accompanied by a check or money order for $100.00 made payable to NCDENR.
Final Checklist
This application will be returned as incomplete unless all of the following items have been included:
❑ Check for $100 made payable to NCDENR
❑ This completed application and all supporting documents
❑ Copy of the valid approved mining permit (MP) for the facility or indication of MP application status
❑ Copy of a county map or other general location map that shows the mining site and nearest major roads
❑ Copy of USGS topographic map showing the mining site and surrounding areas, or other map that clearly
shows site location in relation to nearby streams, wetlands, and other waters, etc.
❑ Copy of mining site plan with all wetlands clearly delineated
❑ If the mine is near wetlands, or may otherwise impact surface water or groundwater, contact the regional
office about an O&M Plan (contact information on the next page). Please refer to this O&M Plan checklist:
✓ Site map with wetlands, ditches, well -placements, borrow areas, overburden storage, stormwater
controls/BMPs, vehicle maintenance areas, settling basins, product process areas, and access roads.
✓ Well information (design, depths, maintenance)
✓ Physical monitoring for the wetlands areas
✓ Settling pond sizing information, if applicable
✓ Level spreader design, if applicable
✓ Details about dewatering method
✓ Description of measures to prevent erosion and flooding
❑ If an ATC or ATO is required, three (3) sets of plans, specifications, and design calculations, signed,
sealed, and dated by a P.E. ATC and ATO requirements in NCG02000 are summarized in Table 1 on
Page 2 of this NOI (see the permit text for more details). Plans shall show all pertinent design features,
including the location of the outfall(s). II stormwater is flowing off -site, the plan must show that stormwater
will not be mixed with wastewater.
Mail the entire package to:
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Note
The submission of this document does not guarantee the issuance of an NPDES permit.
Page 6 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 7114/08

NCG020000 N.O.I.
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area.
DWO Regional Office Contact Information:
Asheville Office ...... [phone]
Fayetteville Office ... [phone]
Mooresville Office ... [phone]
Raleigh Office ........ [phone]
Washington Office ...[phone]
Wilmington Office ... [phone]
Winston-Salem ...... [phone]
Central Office ......... [phone]
Page 7 of 7
SWU-217-071408 Last revised 71l4108

�� ��! _ tl:..'l..+.}r°iw !Q �� "r--"•r � I 1''�A
'N;
i., �� ''�1 �.�� ��
`��_�...-E-` NI ��^"�
u,
N; l��l���'11�.:1t'1"sj f I ".` �
,I..r►� ri
Oil-
44:757—
CRO
XT Al
•v�
.; � i '''-yam-
—•..s
'�.
��"'.
-t..i
Cl
Al
�•`��,, �r:'`+•
'�b
`! �
_wit
�
� +
a'y
�.r./`���
�
d i
�'•- —fir.:_ _
_ ,i
-
1�i
■J
!l
1r`• 1
zti.r
�`� ° ,i'
ra�a'aa2s
>r
�
.11
ED
-Na.•;a•-
�s-•�-----�--��
ti-view:
—-
I r
' • 11
4_�i }
1+ 1 ti
M
��•���
.
77�rTT��yi
•� � w`.- -
• �
•
•
T1k
�•1 Y
�_-
i� r
r`_.'•
it !!
tf
a'��`* � �__
■
s� �
ti 7
r �C,
r' �
r
^{
{ �•y .�
s.l r
-lf � ^�: �r C
/1'J � i�
�.'' '.--� f ��
T I'� I
tr a•
-
f
P i :
r
t �,�+'y t•
75
;too ` c
Ir �✓^
—
?
. S a +,.,
1, " ` j �'! �,
{;♦ [�„�_�
4 t a.
j
yl.+ s�t'�a;^
E?F:;�
s.I"IrJ��
'•
{�
_�/ ,.,� %
�^ R. 'If i
�,4� l•=� `
7• y, i.5
;'
i k+ � `'j �� 3" -
,
��
y �'.. 1 !lFJ� f
f n-
��r`:•+, d'4 i
� ,�� fx `• } 4 �
4_
} j y{` rnil,
'! 3 1 A
� - �J j ,
-5,.
J4a
�"•,i
•V, 4 �
not�' ',J
A r
}y'1.•
:'ti.
',}{34 475
-„���'•✓�;f 1.•-1fr�
�. �. _'
41`-,S tit i1 J',
� _ , _ -i r
ice.: �-
i 1 1', '4-
1� �a
'• �i_ 'r
7 `
� r
4 `.
f.-
�'1'�4 ;1'�r,''�f:
w`,f Jy'�4J'
r, �fV� .f �
��,, T ,, ,�. }f Vf 1,7d '_}
II
L} li.,l~ l i _
� �'�
`Ci''iI
r -4-�• `-
�r i� 'S 7,
`'f;- � 1.
1 ` t✓
IA 3 {-
',•h. Jl;�'..1f {f �"M
'•Fl�'`.
1 _
} "4' L �t ` ',ff
^' ,,
'yh ` V, �
."J �{. f
-^~rl
{} �.� 'i.. .�
,rr,4�,`�, /
S{ .�
♦•� y � -- .i.'j,
yf• s ,ti
,4•
Lr.� ti,.
' a-, % r
� _
,. b i 1-
� s
t_ Se/- f
�'�. ti 1
i.l ,.':/:�fs`i,
'sue. `4 �7, �':3;
.j.�
�� ,{
J
1'
tyy
•-• �n W'� Yw
���
ra`.�
ry �5 >I,! r �,:
I :• `L�.+ '�_,�J
1f7, 14+ac
� t- F} t' � .. 1
•4 } t Kr L
's�
it
Jii . 1 { i 1 t
L'',�' r
tt
r-
1r. ft`' W • _ 1 -'A
1 �. � 1
y.
n' 'F �i
fi` „ a
wk.'`•'
p/�/y�j F
a�L1�i751L
k`•�:-
f+''.
t r.L
•- x',1:+�:..lr
.:J.' ..'� ;^-� ' � a •.
� �, - a.' •'�,
.�.
,, , !� , ^ : b I F
_ � +. . .h. _ 1�4 ,
,'�'�'. K', i...'r t
1.r
i
tL 1111ut�IHLi 4011j7ii111'.4' IYY71JeWIIlte Y�'If1011[ll Llyr„ YAIFA }wake uata: u�l:,� �� SO fl Scale: 1 : 140 DNA- 140 Dan= WGS'&.1

Rouse Borrow Pond
NEWPORT, CARTERET COUNTY
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
January 14, 2004
OWNER: Billy Rouse Jr.
123 Pete Road
NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570
ENGINEER: STROUD ENGINEERING, PA.
151 A HWY 24
MOREH EAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
BACKGROUND: MR. ROUSE HAS APPLIED FOR A MINING PERMIT FOR
PROPERTY HE OWNS IN THE NEWPORT TOWNSHIP OFF OF PETE ROAD. IN
THE PROCESS OF THIS APPLICATION, HE HAS ALSO APPLIED FOR NPDES
GENERAL PERMIT NCG020000 FOR THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FOR
NECESSARY MINE DEWATERING. THIS PROPOSED MINE IS FOR
EXTRACTION OF SAND AND IS LIMITED TO 20 FT DEEP EXCAVATION FROM
THE SURFACE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OWNED BY MR. ROUSE.
PURPOSE: THIS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 1S BEING
DEVELOPED TO ENSURE SITE OPERATIONS WILL NOT IMPACTANY
ADJACENT WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATERS.
OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES:
EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED TO OCCUR IN ROUGHLY FIVE
CYCLES PER YEAR. EACH CYCLE WOULD CONSIST OF DEWATERING THE
EXISTING POND AND WOULD RANGE INITIALLY FROM APPROXIMATELY A
FIVE DAY DEWATERING CYCLE, ASSUMING 1500 GPM PUMPS, TO TEN
DAYS IN THE FUTURE, EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES WOULD BEGIN AND
APPROXIMATELY FOUR DAYS OF SAND MINING OCCURRING. THIS WOULD
STOCKPILE APPROXIMATELY 200 LOADS OF MATERIAL PER CYCLE. THIS
COULD BE REPEATED, BASED ON DEMAND UPTO THREE TIMES OR MORE
PER YEAR, WITH EACH CYCLE LASTING LAST THAN TWO WEEKS. DURING
THE MINING PROCESS, IT IS EXPECTED THAT SMALLER PUMPS WOULD
KEEP UP WITH GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION. THESE PUMPS WOULD BE
IN THE 200 GPM RANGE.
STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES:
NO ACTIVITIES ARE PROPOSED ON THIS SITE OTHER THAN SAND MINING,
STOCKPILING AND HAULING OF SAND FOR SALE, DEWATERING
ACTIVITIES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PUMPED INTO A SEDIMENT BASIN AS
SHOWN ON THE MINE MAP. THE SEDIMENT BASIN IS 45'X75'X5' DEEP AND
CONTAINS A RIPRAP LINED OUTFALL I O'XIO'X2' BEFORE DISCHARGING
INTO AN EXISTING DITCH.

..wti
THE OWNER SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES:
l) SITE INSPECTIONS SHALL OCCUR DURING ALL MINING OPERATIONS
TO INSURE THAT CONTAMINENTS DO NOT ENTER SURFACE
WATERS, ADDITIONAL BERMS OR DIKES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT STORMWATER RUNOFF
WILL DIRECTED BACK INTO THE MINING PIT OR THROUGH THE
SEDIMENT TRAP.
2) LAND DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT
FROM LEAVING THE SITE. ANY SEDIMENT THAT INADVERTENTLY
ACCUMULATES IN THE PROJECT DITCH SHALL BE REMOVED AND
THE DITCH RE -STABILIZED. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS
NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION FROM REACHING THE
OUTLET DITCH.
3) THE SEDIMENT STORAGE BASIN SHALL BE CLEANED OUT AND
RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DEPTH UPON REACHING 50% OF ITS
CAPACITY.
4) EQUIPMENT UTILIZED IN THE MINING OPERATION SHALL BE KEPT
IN GOOD REPAIR AND INSPECTED DAILY TO ENSURE NO LEAKING
OF FUELS, LUBRICANTS, COOLANTS, HYRAULIC FLUIDS OR OILS.
SHOULD ANY LEAKAGE OCCUR IT SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE
CLEANUP TO PREVENT ENTRY INTO ANY SURFACE WATERS.
ANALYTICAL AND QUALITATIVE MONITORING
THE OWNER SHALL IMPLEMENT MONITORING ACTIVITIES AS REQUIRED
BY THE GENERAL PEIZMIT NCG020000. PART III SECTION A AND C APPLIES
AND REQUIRES TESTING. THE OWNER SHALL SECURE APPROPRIATE
TESTING PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THESE TESTS AS REQUIRED.
DEWATERING CONE OF INFLUENCE- WETLANDS DO NOT EXIST WITI-IIN
THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. WITH THE MAXIMUM EXCAVATION DEPTH OF
20' AND WITH THE MAXIMUM DEWATERING OCCURRING IN TWO WEEKS
PER CYLE, IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED THAT THE HYDROLOGY OF ANY
ADJOINING PROPERTIES WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED.
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION- DUE TO THE LACK OF EXISTING
WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED•
THAT ANY MONITORING WELLS SHALL BE NEEDED.

AINA."Al
AMIFT
� 4 '��rr1�'�'!\may
� _.•
I.

E
Rouse Borrow Pond
NEWPORT, CARTERET COUNTY
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
January 14, 2009
OWNER: Billy Rouse Jr.
123 Pete Road
NEWPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28570
ENGINEER: STROUD ENGINEERING, PA.
151,AHWY24
MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA 28557
BACKGROUND: MR. ROUSE HAS APPLIED FOR A MINING PERMIT FOR
PROPERTY HE OWNS IN THE NEWPORT TOWNSHIP OFF OF PETE ROAD. IN
THE PROCESS OF THIS APPLICATION, HE HAS ALSO APPLIED FOR NPDES
GENERAL PERMIT NCG020000 FOR THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER FOR
NECESSARY MINE DEWATERING. THIS PROPOSED MINE IS FOR
EXTRACTION OF SAND AND IS LIMITED TO 20 FT DEEP EXCAVATION FROM
THE SURFACE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS OWNED BY MR. ROUSE,
PURPOSE: THIS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN IS BEING
DEVELOPED TO ENSURE SITE OPERATIONS WILL NOT IMPACT ANY
ADJACENT WETLANDS AND SURFACE WATERS.
OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES:
EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES ARE EXPECTED TO OCCUR IN ROUGHLY FIVE
CYCLES PER YEAR. EACH CYCLE WOULD CONSIST OF DEWATERING THE
EXISTING POND AND WOULD RANGE INITIALLY FROM APPROXIMATELY A
FIVE DAY DEWATERING CYCLE, ASSUMING 1500 GPM PUMPS, TO TEN
DAYS IN THE FUTURE, EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES WOULD BEGIN AND
APPROXIMATELY FOUR DAYS OF SAND MINING OCCURRING. THIS WOULD
STOCKPILE APPROXIMATELY 200 LOADS OF MATERIAL PER CYCLE. THIS
COULD BE REPEATED, BASED ON DEMAND TO THREE TIMES OR MORE
PER YEAR, WITH EACH CYCLE LASTIN LAS THAN TWO WEEKS. DURING
THE MINING PROCESS, IT IS EXPECTED THAT SMALLER PUMPS WOULD
KEEP UP WITH GROUNDWATER INFILTRATION. THESE PUMPS WOULD BE
IN THE 200 GPM RANGE.
STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES:
NO ACTIVITIES ARE PROPOSED ON THIS SITE OTHER THAN SAND MINING,
STOCKPILING AND HAULING OF SAND FOR SALE. DEWATERING
ACTIVITIES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PUMPED INTO A SEDIMENTBASIN AS
SHOWN ON THE MINE MAP. THE SEDIMENT BASIN IS 45'X75'X5' DEEP AND
CONTAINS A RIPRAP LINED OUTFALL 10'X10'X2' BEFORE DISCHARGING
INTO AN EXISTING DITCH.

THE OWNER SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES:
1) SITE INSPECTIONS SHALL OCCUR DURING ALL MINING OPERATIONS
TO INSURE THAT CONTAMINENTS DO NOT ENTER SURFACE
WATERS. ADDITIONAL BERMS OR DIKES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT STORMWATER RUNOFF
WILL DIRECTED BACK INTO THE MINING PIT OR THROUGH THE
SEDIMENT TRAP.
2) LAND DISTURBANCE SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT
FROM LEAVING THE SITE. ANY SEDIMENT THAT INADVERTENTLY
ACCUMULATES IN THE PROJECT DITCH SHALL BE REMOVED AND
THE DITCH RE -STABILIZED. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS
NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION FROM REACHING THE
OUTLET DITCH.
3) THE SEDIMENT STORAGE BASIN SHALL BE CLEANED - D
RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DEPTH UPON REACHIN 50% O ITS
CAPACITY.
4) EQUIPMENT UTILIZED IN THE MINING OPERATION S E KEPT
IN GOOD REPAIR AND INSPECTED DAILY TO ENSURE NO LEAKING
OF FUELS, LUBRICANTS, COOLANTS, HYRAULIC FLUIDS OR OILS.
SHOULD ANY LEAKAGE OCCUR IT SHOULD IMMEDIATELY BE
CLEANUP TO PREVENT ENTRY INTO ANY SURFACE WATERS.
4o,.e
paNh.j
ANALYTICAL AND QUALITATIVE MONITORING $E-Wwl ^'+A-tr VOI,y
THE OWNER SHALL IMPLEMENT MONITORING ACTIVITIES AS REQUIRED
BY THE GENERAL PERMIT NCG020000. PART III SECTION A AND C APPLIES
AND REQUIRES TESTING. THE OWNER SHALL SECURE APPROPRIATE
TESTING PERSONNEL TO PERFORM THESE TESTS AS REQUIRED.
DEWATERING CONE OF INFLUENCE- WETLANDS DO NOT EXIST WITHIN
THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. WITH THE MAXIMUM EXCAVATION DEPTH OF
20' AND WITH THE MAXIMUM DEWATERING OCCURRING IN TWO WEEKS
PER CYLE, IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED THAT THE HYDROLOGY OF ANY
ADJOINING PROPERTIES WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACTED.
MONITORING,WELL INSTALLATION- DUE TO THE LACK OF EXISTING
WETLANDS WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED
THAT ANY MONITORING WELLS SHALL BE NEEDED.

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
Hestron Plaza Two
151A Hwy. 2+
• -` Morehead City, NC 28557
j
[phone]
TO
I
l_
I 1�
i
I
I WE ARE SEND' YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via \� � the following,items:
/
Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples- p Specification. s�
Copy of letters ❑ Change order ❑ tff }
i p,7clr; � •j t
[AuvIgn O[� 4 o d LJVMOU7I. 1L
DATE _ _
Joe No. 3] �
ATTE
1
1l
��
•
��
•
��
W e0mrn
OF
..�®
-rkmn
y r
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
5( For approval !i ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
> I
❑ For review and comment
❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
040
I
COPY TO 1
i SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notlfy s av dace.

a
t

NORTH CAROLINA
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION
nuF 7r°"Q � q
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
I3f"-c ZIYI�I
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
[phone]
Revised: January 30, 2008

MINING
PERMIT
APPLICA
TION
REVIEW
PROCESS
FLOWCH
It is recommended that you contact the appropriate
Regional Office (see Regional Office listing in the back of this
booklet) or the Raleigh Central Office for a
PRE -APPLICATION MEETING
to discuss your intentions and address any questions.
ART
BEGINNING OF PROCESS
Application received by Land Quality Section/
State Mining Specialist
Application assigned to
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Assistant State Mining Specialist/Program Secretary
routes application for review and comment
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
- N. C. Geological Survey
- Wildlife Resources Commission
- Division of Water Resources
- Division of Archives & History
- Division of Parks & Recreation
- Others as appropriate
All application review comments forwarded to
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Is application complete?
If "YES", Assistant State Mining
Specialist drafts the proposed
Applicant issues
Public Notice
- Land Quality Section Regional Office
- Division of Air Quality
- Division of Water Quality
Review Public Comments;
Public Hearing Possible
If "NO", Assistant State Mining
Specialist drafts a letter requesting
additional information from applicant

Application & proposed permit action
reviewed by State Mining Specialist
Is application &
proposed permit action
complete/acceptable?? ,S
If "Yes", the following permit actions
are issued by the State Mining Specialist:
- Draft Permits
- Permit Transfers/Name Changes
- Bond Substitutions/Cancellations
- Permit Releases
- Inactive Renewals
- High Airblast Remediation Plans
- Non -controversial New Permits
- Non -controversial Renewals
- Small, Non -controversial Modifications
END OF PROCESS
If "YES", application & proposed
permit action forwarded to and
reviewed by Division Director
Is application &
proposed permit action
complete/acceptable??
If "YES", the proposed permit action is
issued by the Division Director
LITY SECTION
R A MININr E
If "No", application & proposed
OR.ly1,j permit action returned to Assistant
State Mining Specialist for revision
(go to *)
For other permit actions, if "Yes",
application & proposed permit action
forwarded to and reviewed by Land
Quality Section Chief
Is application &
proposed permit action
complete/ acceptable??
If "NO", application & proposed permit
action returned to State Mining Specialist/
Assistant State Mining Specialist for revision
(go to *)
If "NO", application & proposed permit
action returned to Section Chief/State Mining
Specialist for revision
(go to
END OF PROCESS If

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Name of Mine Rouse Borrow Pond
River Basin White Oak
Latitude (decimal degrees to four places) N34.44'163
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places) W76-52-57-28
2.Nannc ofApphcant*Billy Rouse
County Carteret
3.Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 123 Pete Rd. Newport, NC 28570
Telephone [phone]
Alternate No.
4.Mine Office Address 123 Pete Rd. Newport, NC 28570
Telephone ( 252) 726-6761
Mine Manager Billy Rouse Jr.
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of
our knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
***Signature r7 /� 1 Date 1/26/09
Print Name Billy Rouse Jr.
Title Owner/Mine Manager
This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (securityl that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a complete application or, if a public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the filing of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required
maps provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.

I I
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered regarding your mining operation
for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding, detailed
mine map.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
1. Answer all of the following that apply:
_04
u
Ifthis is an application for a NEW permit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by
the permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon): 5.02 ac
Of this acreage, how much is owned and how much is leased? Acres owned: 5.02 ac
Acres leased: NIA Property owner if leased: NIA
If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Pert -nit No.: NIA
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon): NIA
If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit,
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: NIA Total permitted acreage: NIA
indicate the mining permit
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No ❑. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon): NIA
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved penmitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No O. If yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: NIA . (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application
form entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the pennit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.:
disturbed, ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, a "minor
modification" fee of $100.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes,
indicate the acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the pennit (the total acreage
to be added to the pennit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
NIA
If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining pennit, indicate the mining permit number
and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing pen -nit.
Mining Permit No.: NIA Total permitted acreage: NIA
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT THE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO
BE PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE
NOTED ABOVE
2. Name of all materials mined: Sand
).Mining method:
❑ Hydraulic Dredge ❑ Front-end Loader & Truck ® Shovel & Truck
❑ Dragline & Truck ❑ Self -loading Scraper
Other (explain):
4.a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 25'

%
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e.g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)_
Natural uround level
b. Expected average depth of mine (feet) 20+/-
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes ❑ No
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted?
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maxunum): 10 )Es
B. MAPS
Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six 6 copies, of a 7.5-minute
quadrangle and a county highway map. These rnaps, in addition to six (6) copies of all mine maps and
reclamation maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-rninute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
1612 Marl Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 5`" Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
wwty. ueolouv.enr.state. nc. usl
County highway maps may be obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Geographic Inforrnation Systems (GIS)
Mailing Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
1587 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
www.nc(lot.org.litlgigContact/dcftiuIt.litml
2. Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on
the maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining
permits can only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only
denote those activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit.
All rnaps must be of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the
following, at a minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
c. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location
and distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
J. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.

i
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by
the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the mine map.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek, stream,
river, or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an adjoining tract
is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of
record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary, must
be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel or less
and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
1. Name of applicant
2. Name of mine
3. North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
6. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
S. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE
MAP SCALE
0-49 Acres
1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres
1 inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres
I inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of
tailings/sediment ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other
major aspect of the mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining
permit. A table/chart similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment Ponds
0.08 ac
Stockpiles
0.12 ac
Wastepiles
0.12 ac
Processing Area/Haul Roads
0.09 ac
Mine Excavation
2.75 ac
Other (Explain)
Total Disturbed Acreage
3.16 ac
NOTE:
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM. THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE
MAPS.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
].Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and
reference the sequence to the mine map(s). Attach additional sheets as needed.
] .Install stone construction entrance.
2.Establish Buffer's
3.Cleargrasses and stockpile topsoil.
4.Construct sedment basin.
5. Dcwatcring.
6.Excavate sand material
7.Truck sand material offsite
$.Reclaim mine site.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining to prevent ofl'site sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for
mine excavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence
of installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and
erosion control measures on the mine map(v) and provide typical crass-sections/construction details
of each measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any
proposed measures.
The haul road sill] be maintained by adding water durning dry periods to control dust, and by using
rock during wet periods to prevent truckers from tracking sediment offsite. Silt fencing shall be installed around
ail stockpile and waste piles area's and along the haul road where sediment could leave the site or enter a
drainage ditch. Any disturbed area that is inactive for more than 15 consecutive days shall be seeded and
mulched.
3. a. Will the operation involve washing the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste
water handling? Yes ❑ No H. If yes, briefly describe all such processes including any chemicals to be
used.
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point
discharge to the waters of the State? Yes ® No ❑. If yes, briefly describe the nature of the
discharge and locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your
mine map(s).
The dewatering discharged is proposed to be pumped into a sediment settling basin approx.
(45'x 75' x 5' ). The water from the sediment basin will then spill onto a (10' x 10' x 2') rip rap apron in the
existing ditch as shown on the map.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
c. Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? Estimated withdrawal
rate in gallons per day: 1,789,088 million max Locate all existing wells on the
inine niap(s) that lie within 500 feet of the proposed exca"ation area. Provide data to support any
conclusions or statements made, including any monitoring well data, well construction data and
current water withdrawal rates. Indicate whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public
water system or private wells.
Privae wells within 500 of the site are shown on the mining map. The depths of these wells range
from 150' + 200' +, therefore the dewatering operation at the mine should have no affect on he wells.
d.If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or
obtained the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stonnwater, etc.) from
the Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to register
water use with the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than 10,000 gallons
per day and needs a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if the operation lies in
a capacity use area and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
NPDES applied for on - 1/26/09
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes ❑ No ®.
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Should dust become a problem, the mine operator shall apply water to any stock piles and haul road as
needed.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary
or right-of-way. It may be an unexcavated bufler (no excavation, but roadways, benns and
erosion & sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no
disturbance within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site
conditions. Note that all buffers must be located within the mining permit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit
boundary or right-of-way at this site? A minimum buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a
wider buffer may be needed depending on site conditions. Show all he ffer locations and widths
on the mine map(s).
A minimum 25' wide unexcavated Buffer shall be maintained along the pen -nit boundaries.
b. A minimum 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing
activities within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless
smaller undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending on site conditions, a buffer wider than 56
feet may be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing activities within
the mining pen -nit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all
buffer locations and widths on the !nine map(s).
No wet lands or natural water courses are on site.
6.a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit
boundaries (luring mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material
and minimum 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required,
unless technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
A minimum 25' wide buffer shall be maintained between the excavation area and all permit
boundaries. Also, the vertical slopes of the excavated area above the natural water table shall be 3:1.
b. Provide a cross-section on the mine map(s)
disposal areas, etc.), clearly indicating the
benches and/or slope drains (with supporting
final stabilization.
See mining map.
for all fill slopes (berms, wastepiles, overburden
intended side slope gradient, installation of anv
design information) if needed, and the method of
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes
including specifications for benchvig and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes mast he
provided on the mine map(s).
3:1 or flatter vertical slopes shall be established above the natural water table.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -
sections of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all safety
benches and mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
No hard rock material is expected to be encountered at this site.
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map if they are within 300 feet of any proposed excavation.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and location of each
type of barricade to he used must be indicated on the mine maps).
A gate for the haul road Located on the mine site shall be locked except while trucks are hauling.
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No E.
If yes, how will acid water pollution from the excavation, stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the
operation from public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation,
building berms or other measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine map(5)
and provide cross -sections through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species
for tree plantings.
There are no such facilities within 300' of the area.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park,
forest or recreation area? If so, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?

APPLICATION FOIL A MINING PERMIT
11. Will explosives be used? Yes ❑ No Z.
If yes, specify the types of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground
vibrations. Depending on the urine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information
may be required on the blasting program (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest
of
fvite occupied structure(5) to the proposed excavationO on the mine map and indicate its
approximate distance to the proposed excavation.
12. Will fuel tanks, solvents, or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes ❑ No Z.
If yes, describe these materials, how they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill.
Indicate the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(5).
D. RECLAMATION PLAN
Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used u1 reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or
establishment of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other
pollution. This information must be illustrated on a reclamation map and must correspond directly with
the information provided on the mine map(v). In addition, design information, including typical
cross -sections, of any permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the
location(s) of all permanent channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Water shall be impounded in the final mined area for use by fish. The banks shall be vegetated with
species to prevent erosion. All other disturbed areas will be returned to their premining condition.
2.1s an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes ❑ No ❑.
If yes, illustrate the location of the body(s) of water on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed body(y) of water. The minimum water depth must be at least 4
feet, measured from the normal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a
more shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes ® No ❑
If yes, specify species.
Catfish
3. Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
There shall be no excavation of rock this site.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine
waste areas, including specifications for benching and sloping. Final cross -sections and locations for
such areas must be provided on the reclamation map.
Any refuse material encountered in the mine site shall be disposed of offsite. Any spoils which maybe
stockpiled during mine excavation area during reclaimation.
Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
There shall no processing facilities at this site. Stockpile area's shall be hauled offsite prior to site
reclaimation. Haul roads disturbed areas shall be seeded during reclamation.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes ® No ❑.
If yes, identify .such roadKcrys on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and
ditch line stabilization.
Exiting haul road will remain for access to fish pond. Road will be packed dirt and gravel. Adjacent
Drainage ditches will be seeded to prevent erosion.
6.Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables,
or other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off -site Venerated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without rior written approval
from the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and
either the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal
permit has been issued by DWM for the site, a copy of said permit must be attached to this
application. All temporwy and permanent refuse disposal areas mist be clearly delineated on the
mine lnap(5) and reclamation map, along tii*h a list of items to be disposed in said areas.
No such waste or containments are expected to be encountered in the nine area. if such refuse
materials are found they shall be removed from the site and disposed of in an appropriate facility. No waste
materials or contaminants shall be brought to the site for disposal.

7. Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan
must include recommendations for year-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount
and type of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general
seeding instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree
plantings is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Water Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service,
specialists and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest
Resources at North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources;
EN.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
g.N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre): (e;�) ` "ens/QCf e-
>F'ERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre): (Ov9L6S./OC
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATE(S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND. SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Seed Tv es:
See mining map
Seeding Dates:
Seedinu Rates:
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF
ANCHORING:
S e �. r✓f r �� i n s r+'�► u 4p
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS — TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
See mining rnap
Revegetation and/or reforestation plan approved by:
Signature "'
Print Name Ronald D. Cullipher, P.E.
Title Professional Engineer
Agency Stroud Engineering, PA.
�If'ItssIInIt"*
i12� 4 •,101 ......�
1 i a SEAL
7�
13343 ; � ;
.
O q.�.

E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be used to establish an appropriate bond (basal z.spon a
range q/ $S00 to $5,000 per affected acre)fur each pertnilled mine rile bused upon the acreage approved
by the Department to be affected during the life_ of the mining permit. Please insert the approximate
acreg e, for each a t)ect of the mining operation, that you intend to affecl during; the life of this minin�T
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
RECLAMATION
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE*
COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds:
0.08 Ac.
X
$ 500.00
/Ac.
_ $ 40.00
Stockpiles:
0.12 Ac.
X
$ 1800.00
/ Ac.
_ $ 216.00
Wastepiles:
0.12 Ac.
X
$ 2000.00
1 Ac.
— $ 240.00
Processing Area/Haul Roads:
0.09 Ac.
X
$ 1800.00
/ Ac.
_ $ 162.00
Mine Excavation:
2.75 Ac.
X
S 500.00
/ Ac.
= S 1375.00
Other:
0 Ac.
X
$ 0
/ Ac.
_ $ 0
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.:
3.16 Ac.
(TOTAL PERMITTED AC.:
5.02Ac.)
Temnorary & Pennanent Sedimentation & Erosion Control Measures:
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existing excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be graded for positive drainage where measures
will be needed to prevent offsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsite watercourses and wetlands.
a) Internal Drainage 3.16 Ac.
b) Positive Drainage 0 Ac. X 51,500.00 = $ 0
SUBTOTAL COST: $ 2033.00
Inflation Factor:
0
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: S 40.66 X Pcrmit Lifc (1 to 10 years): 10
INFLATION COST: $ 406.60
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COST + INFLATION COST = $ 2,439.60
Total Reclamation Bond Cost: $ 2,400.00
(round down to the nearest $100.00)

F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "Notice" form, or a facsimile thereof, attached to this application must be sent certified or registered
mail, return receipt requested, to:
(1) the chief administrative officer of each county and municipality in which any part of the
permitted area is located as indicated on the mine map(s);
(2) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the
lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified
(that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s); and
(3) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway, creek, stream,
river, or other watercourse, railroad track, or utility or other public right-of-way. If an
adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract,
all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet
of the mining permit boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s). "Highway" means a road
that has four lanes of travel or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
The only exception to the above method of giving notice is if another means of notice is approved in
advance by the Director, Division of Land Resources.
A copy of a tax map (or other alternative acceptable to the Department) must be mailed with the completed
"Notice" form (the proposed overall permit boundaries and the names and locations of all owners of
record of lands adjoining said boundaries must be clearly denoted on the tax map).
The "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be completed, notarized and submitted to
the Department, with the remainder of the completed application form, before the application will be
considered complete.
THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS FOR NEW MINING PERMITS
AND ALL MODIFICATIONS OF A MINING PERMIT TO ADD LAND TO THE PERMITTED
AREA, AS REQUIRED BY NCGS 74-50(bl).
SEE THE NEXT TWO PAGES FOR THE "NOTICE" FORM AND THE "AFFIDAVIT OF
NOTIFICATION"

NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions C.S. 74-50(bl) of'I'he Mining Act of 1971, Notice is hereby given that
Billy Rouse Jr.
(Applicant Name)
has applied on 1 /26/09
(Date)
to the Land Quality Section, Division of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
® a new surface mining pennit,
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no
disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant
to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine Sand on 5.02 acres located 0.355074
(Mineral, Ore (Number) (Miles)
South of Newport off/near road HWY 24
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Numbcr/Name)
in Carteret County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort, satisfactory to the
Department, to notify all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the
mining permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the
mining permit boundary). In addition, the mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the
county or municipality in which any part of the pennitted area is located. Any person may file written
corriment(s) to the Department at the above address within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the
filing of the application for a permit, whichever is later. Should the Department determine that a significant
public interest exists relative to G.S. 74-51, a public hearing will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day
comment period specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials is on file and available tar public review during normal business hours
at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information ret,,ardiny, the
specifics of the proposed mining activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
252-726-6761. For information on the mining permit application review process, please contact the Mining
Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant written
comments/documentation within the nrovisions of the Mining Act of 1971 throughout the application review
See Attached List
(Addressee/Owner of Record's
Name and Address)
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
Billy Rouse Jr.
(Name of Applicant: Include Contact Person
& Company Name, if Applicable)
123 Pete Rd. Newport, NC 28570
(Address of Applicant)

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
I, Billy Rouse Jr. , an applicant, or an agent, or employee of
an applicant, for a new Mining Permit, or a modification of an existing Mining Pen -nit to add land to the
permitted area, from the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, being first duly sworn, do
hereby attest that the following are all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that
are adjoining the mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant
or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within
1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be
mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to said owners of record at their addresses shown
below, such notice being given on a form provided by the Department:
(Adjoining Landowner Name) (Address)
See Attached List
(Attach additional list if necessary)
1 do also attest that the following individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in
which any part of the permitted area is located and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be
mailed, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to said office at the following address:
(Chief Administrative Officer Name) (Address)
[i.e.: City Manager, County Manager, Mayor, etc.]
John Lan don County Manager Courthouse Square, Beaufort,NC 28516
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of
land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the
applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining pen -nit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or
municipality in which any part of the permitted area is located in compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-50(bl) and 15A
NCAC 5B .0004(d). I understand that it is the responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts of mailing
showing that the above notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
L1 /26/09
Signa ure of Applica t or Agent Date
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following information:
Name of applicant:
Title of person executing Affidavit

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
I, -� ��✓ a Notary Public of the County of C'�-✓�v ,
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that z� &'/- Z _> ; -'-�
appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit was made by hfin/her.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of __-J / 20 05.
Notary: �� my Commission expires: 7 z o�

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our
lands or operation during regular business hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or
investigations as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S.
74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on
the land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to
carry out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant
to G.S. 74-59.
LANDOWNER:
Signature:
Print Name: Billy Rouse_Jr.
(Title, if applicable)
Company �N/A�
(If applicable)
Address: 123 Pete Rd.
Newport NC 28570
Telephone: (252 ) 7266761
APPLICANT:
Signature:*
Print Name: Billy Rouse Jr.
Title: Mine M
Company:
Mine Name: Rouse Borrow Pond
Telephone: [phone]
Date Signed: �1 /26/09 Date Signed: _1 /26/09
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
maps and reclamation maps, and the appropriate rocessin s tee [sec next page for tee seneautc) to the
form a check or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources must be sent to the Land Quality Section Central Oft -ice at the address listed on the front cover
of this application form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
MINING FEE SCHEDULE
A nonrefundable permit application processing fee when filing for a new mining permit, a major permit modification or a rencnval
permit is required as follows:
New Permit Applications
Permit Modifications
Permit Renewals
Transfers/Minor Modifications*
0-25 acres 26+acres
$3,750.00
$5,000.00
$750.00
$1,000.00
$750.00
$11000.00
$100.00
$100.00
" A nonrefundable $100.00 permit application processing fee is required for minor permit modifications, Minor permit modifications include ownership transfers, mane
changes, bond substitutions and permit renewals where the mine is inactive and fully stabilized. A minor permit modification also includes lands added to a permitted
area, outside of the minimum permit buffer zone requirements, where no plans for mining related disturbance of the added lands have been approved. All other changes
are considered major permit modifications.
Acres for new permits and renewal permits means the total acreage at the site. Acres for major modification of permits means that area of land affected by the
modification within the permitted mine area, or any additional land that is to be disturbed and added to an existing permitted area, or both.
-22-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
There are seven Land Quality Section (LQS) Regional Offices. Use the map below to locate the Regional Office
serving your county.
Asheville Regional Office
-Counties: Avery, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Cherokee, Clay, Graham, Haywood, Henderson, Jackson,
Macon, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Polk, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania, Yancey
*Address: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778
.Voice: 828.296.4500
-FAX: [phone]
Fayetteville Regional Office
-Counties: Anson, Bladen, Cumberland, Harnett, Hoke, Montgomery, Moore, Richmond, Robeson, Sampson,
Scotland
*Address: 225 Green Street, (Systel Building), Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
•Voice: 910.433.3300
FAX: [phone]
Mooresville Regional Office
-Counties: Alexander, Cabarrus, Catawba, Cleveland, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanly,
Union
.Address: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
-Voice: 704.663.1699
.FAX: [phone]
Raleigh Regional Office
-Counties: Chatham, Durham, Edgecombe, Franklin, Granville, Halifax, Johnston, Lee, Nash, Northampton,
Orange, Person, Vance, Wake, Warren, Wilson
.Address: 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 or 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609
.Voice: 919.791.4200
-FAX: [phone]
Washington Regional Office
-Counties: Beaufort, Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Greene, Hertford, Hyde, Jones,
Lenoir, Martin, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Perquitnans, Pitt, Tyrrell, Washington, Wayne
-Address: 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889
-23-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
*Voice: 252.946.6481
-FAX: [phone]
LAND QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (continued)
Wilmington Regional Office
•Counties: Brunswick, Carteret, Columbus, Duplin, New Hanover, Onslow, Pender
•Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405
*Voice: 910.796.7215
.FAX: [phone]
Winston-Salem Regional Office
*Counties: Alamance, Alleghany, Ashe, Caswell, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Rockingham, Randolph,
Stokes, Surry, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin
*Address: 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
•Voice: 336.771.5000
•FAX: [phone]
-24-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
SCHEDULE OF RECLAMATION COSTS
tBased upon_range of $500 - $5,000 per affected acre)
COMMODITY CODES: SC = Sand and/or Gravel, GS = Gemstone, Borrow = Borrow/fill dirt, CS = Crushed
Stone, DS = Dimension Stone, FS = Feldspar, MI = Mica, LI = Lithium, PF = Pyrophyllite, OL = Olivine,
KY = Kyatlite/Siliimanite/Andalusite, PH = Phosphate, CL = Clay/Shale, PE = Peat; AU = Gold, TI = Titanium, and
OT = Other
Type T/S Ponds S.piles W.piles P.area/H.R. Mine Excay.
SG, GS, S500/ac.(L) S 18001ac. S2000/ac. $1800/ac. S500/ac.(L)
Borrow 1500(FI) $2000(PD)
CS, DS, 500(L) ]Soo 2000 2000 500(L)
FS, MI, 1500(FI) 2500(PD)
LI, PF, OL, KY
PH 1000(L) 2500 5000 5000 2000(L)
2500(FI) 5000(PD)
CL 1000(L) 2500 5000 5000 2000(L)
2500(FI) 3700(PD)
PE, AU, 1000(L) 2500 3000 3500 2000(L)
TI, OT 2500(FI) 5000(PD)
(L) = reclamation to a lake and revegetating sideslopes
(FI) = reclamation by tilling iii and revegetating
(PD) = reclamation by grading for positive drainage & revegetating
AS PER NCAC 15A 5B.0003, IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE BOND AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE
BOND CALCULATION WORKSHEET, YOU MAY SUBMIT AN ESTIMATE OF RECLAMATION
COSTS FROM A THIRD PARTY CONTRACTOR. SAID ESTIMATE MUST BE PROVIDED WITHIN 30
DAYS TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Mining Program, Land Quality Section, 1612 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
ALL ESTIMATES MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING, AS A MINIMUM_:
*FINAL GRADING COSTS PER ACRE
*LIME AND FERTILIZER COSTS PER ACRE
*YEAR-ROUND SEEDING MIXTURE COSTS PER ACRE (FROM APPROVED
REVEGETATION PLAN IN APPLICATION/PERMIT DOCUMENT)
*MULCH AND ANCHORING COSTS PER ACRE
•ANY OTHER RECLAMATION COSTS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED
RECLAMATION PLAN FOR THE SITE IN QUESTION
YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE OF THE DIRECTOR'S FINAL BOND
DETERMINATION.
- 25 -

sPu, wpp.��it-I -a-e4 7'0 We-1
n r t,-Je, sr!"e

\ THE SIDE PANELS ARE TO BE
_v ~� �� 6' TAL4 10' OFF SIDE BOUNDARY
�4 V J�\ ` \ AND 10 LONG
\ N/F JERRY E SNAVEL Y
\ DEED BOOK 1087
\ PAGE 14
N/F LOIS P WHALEY \
DEED BOOK 430 \ 10.
PAGE 117 \ \ /C4
'\PROPOSED 6' TALL (198.00) FT LONG
Z C"IN LINK FENgE
0 TOSTART AT 10
m ` OFF A OPUSEO PROPERTY LINETHE 51 PANELS ARE TD BE6- T L( F 510E BOUNDARY rvift
1 \
10
F
N/F KATHERINE M OGLESBY \ r o
DEED BOOK 482 - ~"
PAGE 48
,1
PERMIT BOUNDARY
N/F JOHN WAYNE BRYANT
DEED BOOK 1236
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
l`
BOUNDARY AND PERMIT AREA
5.02
AC
PROPOSED MINE AREA
(EXCAVATION AREA)
2.75
AC
HAUL ROAD / SOIL ROAD
0.97
AC
PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREAS
0.16
AC
PROPOSED WASTE AREA
0.16
AC
UNEXCAVATED BUFFER AREA
1.21
AC
PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA
4.04
AC
NOTES:
1) THE PRIVATE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF EXCAVATION LIMITS ARE SHOWN
ON MAP.
2) TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X
AS CLASSIFIED AND SHOWN ON FEMA
MAP 3720633600J. DATED 7/16/03
3) ALL STRUCTURE WITHIN 500 FEET
OF THE MINING SITE ARE SHOWN ON PLAN
4) TEMPORARY STOCKPILES AND WASTEPILES
SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO RECLAMATION.
ROAD WAYS AND DITCHES NOT WITHIN
EXCAVATION AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AND RETURNED TO EXISTING STATE,
5) EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING ARE STRICTLY
PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE.
6) NO FUEL TANKS OR OTHER CHEMICAL
REAGENTS SHALL BE STORED ONSITE.
7) EXISTING DISTURBANCE IN THE PROPOSED
25'UNDISTURBED BUFFER AREA SHALL BE
SEEDED AND ONLY THE PROPOSED HAUL ROAD
SHALL BE USED DURING MINING ACTIVITIES.
CHRONOLOGICAL SEOUENCE OF LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
1.) INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
2.1 ESTABLISH BUFFERS
3.) CLEAR GRASSES AND STOCKPILE: TOPSOIL
4.) EXCAVATE SAND MATERIAL
5.) TRUCK SAND MATERIAL OFFSITE
6.) RECLAIM MINE SITE
SHEET r2 OF 2
PROJECT K: PM 625-3
DESIGN FILE 0:625/625-3.DGN
EXISTING GRADE
TEMPRARY SEEIlOr • STOCKPILE r
AYS
JF
FILL SLWr - ION
N.T.
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFER
53753.87 SF 11.27 AC}
o° F�'jsT
ti• !tic
olr�ti
S>' O v� yF41
elp
qG
F
6" MIN. SOIL COVER
AT RECLAMATION
WITH SEEDING
CKROL DEN RECLAMATION AND TEMMAIRY KRY DETAIL
N.T.S.
NOTE: RECLAIM MINED AREAS CONCURRENTLY WITH MINING OPERATIONS.
EMBANKMENTS ARE TO BE SLOPED AND SEEDED WHEN MINING
OPERATIONS ARE DISCONTINUED FOR 15 DAYS OR MORE IN ANY
PARTICULAR AREA.
RECLAIMATION P
WATER LEVEL
CUT SLOPE X-SECTION
N.T.S.
SEED PER SEEDING
SCHEDULE
PERMIT BOUNDARY FINAL DITCH STABILIZATION DETAIL
N.T.S.
2S, N/F CLYDE W. YOUNG III
DEED BOOK 397
UfY�r�c PAGE 221
q rrq rFa
R
NOTES:
NO WETLANDS EXIST WITHIN THE
PERMITTED BOUNDARY.
ALL EXCAVATION
OF PROPOSED MINE SHALL
BE DONE AS WET MINING AND NO DISCHARGE
OF GROUND WATER WILL BE ALLOWED.
µ•AST E
ARE A
w
z
J
I }.
25' BUFFER
Iw
MAX,
SIDE SLOPE =
3:1
OR GREATER
EXISTING GRADE
w
11
TOPSOIL
C3
z
a
z
0Ne
�
SAW, ".
>
t�
ss3' 6;•O6 CUT SCOPE x-SECTION
0+ N.T.S.
�q w N/F GILBERT G COOPER, JR
f,I►j�r! HC DEED BOOK 596
HAUL
GE 24
D1 ROCESOA
SING&AREA
h (0.09 AC)
5'
sIaCy, PILE ; ADD 50' STONE
ARCA /� CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SOPOSED ' 20, SOIL Ropp-�
i
C
u
L
SITE
z
c�
BOGUE SOUND
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
LJ-, T­t�
d
I-T
EXISTING
ROAD
-I 8 RUN
ABC)
wl
PAGE 388 9 SILT F
EX.CHE-EI(�M `
5041 16 SF 0 �
Ira
a,1b LTNCE.
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFER p.�b AL
53753.87 SF c 1.27 AC ► PROPOSE
GATE STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
TO REMAIN LOCKED
Av ATED BUFFER EXCEPT DURING
Z5, NEXC 1tC HAUL HOURS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
i U EX1S VIM D N SEEDING SCHEDULE
_-
g93.39 ; SEEDBED PREPARATION
MONO
g?9�yb0
•0A 1 LIME------.-.---------------------- 2 TONS/AC.
10-10-20------------------------•- 1,000 LBS./AC
' 0-20-0----------------------------- 500 LBS./AC (AFTER SEEDING}
r ~~ \ ASPHALT TACK--------------------200 GAL./TON OF MULCH
NORTHSIDE TOP SEEDING MIXTURE
-- TiNG p TCH DITCH BANK EXI�ITING GRAVEL RD. (FEBRUARY 1 -APR I L 30 )
Ex�s ,
0.77 AC TALL FESCUE------------
.•— --_
� ` --- ----- 50 LBS./AC
PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS--------- 10 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED)---50 LBS./AC
LANDSCAPING MIXTURE
N/F JACKIE L. ROUSE ( MAY 1 -AUGUST 31 )
DEED BOOK 1068 TALL FESCUE- 50 LBS./AC
\ N/F JOSEPH A.TUCKER JR PAGE 59 �, WEEPING LOVEGRASS------------ 5 LBS./AC
\ DEED BOOK 929
� PAGE 272 �, KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA(SCARIFIED) ---- 50 LBS. /AC
BROWNTOP MILLET--------------- 25 LBS./AC
` (SEPTEMBER 1 JANUARY 31)
ti �{ TYP ROAD WIDTH 20'FT TALL FESCUE---------------------- 60 LBS./AC
i 1 1 KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (UNSCARIFIED)--- 60 LBS./AC
�
----------------------
ti RYE (GRAIN) 25 LBS./AC
FOR SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER ADO 30 LBS./AC SERICEA LESPEDEZA
— AND 15 LBS. WEEPING LOVEGRASS.
r (JANUARY 1 - MARCH 31)
11 I COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (UNHULLED)----- 20LBS. LBS./AC
.\ l
+. ( APR 1 L 1 - JULY 31 )
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (HULLED) -------- 12 LBS./AC
NOTES: 12 GAUGE WIRE. 10,' MAX. WITH WIRE `
i
6 MAX WITHOUT WIRE N/F BILLY E.ROUSE
1. USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32' IN WIDTH ANO A MINIMUM OF MINIMUM F I L TER i DEED BOOK 553
LINE
2. USEFILTER FAH12- STAY
OF 36'•IN 'WIDTH AND FASTEN FILTER FABRIC FABRIC PAGE 68 REVISIONS
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES. NCbDT 105E No. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
3. PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTbNER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. TYPE 3, CLASS 8
4. USE 6' POST WITH 3' DIAMETER. COMPACTED FILL 1 1 r1cm 5-009 LOS STATE CQY1lEA?
2 cm 5-25-0 5
1 t APPRO. DISTANCE 1,672' sE
3 xxalrr
FROM MINE BOUNDRY REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 430, PAGE 117 ACM
SDEED BOOK 100E, PAGE4a_ILT FENCE DETAIL � i TO NC HWY 24 _
r
SCALE:: NOT TO SCALE y MINING MAP
r OUSE ff On"'OW PnND
NEWPORT TOWNSHIP. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: BILLY ROUSE DESIGNED
- ROC
ADDRESS: 123 PETE RO.
NEWPORT, N.C. 28570 DRAWN:
r�
J C M
titre}rrrr
PHONE, 252-726-6761 CHECKED. ROC
60 30 0 60 120
SEAL Sri = S STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. APPROVED: RDC
�? T3343 *ft 151A HIGHWAY 24
%,�%�'�G1NE�Q-•••`vQ``� AD CITY. N.C. 28557
SCALE: i` = 60' •,�(Q • ..,..• ��Q`Z'��+ (252) 2 -7479 LICENSE NO.C-0647 DATE 1/12/0
�h•r����+.♦ SCALE
NALD D. CULLIPHER E. 1` = 60'
_. _ - _ - -_ - - _ "T T.---r-•r-• � -• --r ram''"'-r.—� .i' -�-' -7r
1 _�. �i �: II. ..... �,...�!.♦ s_�.',_; ..I.-,.. f...r �� ..1 .�!.. F.'�}'.� ��'�'!5,.l.Lti1...-.il..�i �'./,r ,`�i:f1.�.�.l.i ^':.F�%{++1A4,

Q (� THE SIDE PANELS ARE TO 8E
IN/\ \ ` ANDT1p4 LDONDDFF SIDE BOUNDARY
J �
\ N/F JERRY E SNAVELY
DEED BOOK 1087
\ PAGE 14
N/F LOIS P WHALEY \
DEED BOOK 430 \ �' 10.
PAGE 117 \ °�
'r \
t PROPOSED 6' TALL (198.001 FT LONG
O C41N LINK FENq£
TO START Al 10
�7 OFF PRROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
_ THE SLOE PANELS ARE TD 8E
61
ANDTA0O F SIDE BOUNDARY ry
IPA
1 �-
N/F KATHERINE M OGLESBY
DEED BOOK 482
PAGE 48
•r
PERMIT BOUNDARY
CATEGORY
ACREAGE �t
l
BOUNDARY AND PERMIT AREA
5.02
`
AC
PROPOSED MINE AREA
(EXCAVATION AREA)
2.75
AC
HAUL ROAD / SOIL ROAD
0.97
AC
PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREAS
0.16
AC
PROPOSED WASTE AREA
0.16
AC
UNEXCAVATED BUFFER AREA
1.21
AC
PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA
4.04
AC
NOTES:
1) THE PRIVATE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF EXCAVATION LIMITS ARE SHOWN
ON MAP.
2) TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X
AS CLASSIFIED AND SHOWN ON FEMA
MAP 3720633600J. DATED 7/16/03
3) ALL STRUCTURE WITHIN 500 FEET
OF THE MINING SITE ARE SHOWN ON PLAN
4) TEMPORARY STOCKPILES AND WASTEPILES
SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO RECLAMATION.
ROAD WAYS AND DITCHES NOT WITHIN
EXCAVATION AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AND RETURNED TO EXISTING STATE.
5) EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING ARE STRICTLY
PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE.
6) NO FUEL TANKS OR OTHER CHEMICAL
REAGENTS SHALL BE STORED ONSITE.
7) EXISTING DISTURBANCE IN THE PROPOSED
25'UNDISTURBED BUFFER AREA SHALL BE
SEEDED AND ONLY THE PROPOSED HAUL ROAD
SHALL BE USED DURING MINING ACTIVITIES.
CHRONOLOGICAL. SEQUENCE OF LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY
1.) INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
2.) ESTABLISH BUFFERS
3.) CLEAR GRASSES AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL
4.) EXCAVATE SAND MATERIAL
5.) TRUCK SAND MATERIAL OFFSITE
6.) RECLAIM MINE SITE
SHEET *2 OF 2
PROJECT ": PM 625-3
DESIGN FILE °:625/625-3.DGN
EXISTI
TEMPORARY STOCKPILE
crrnrrn 1FTER 15 DAYS
cv 0- SL
it
1
NATURAL SURFAC 2'
FILL SLOPE N.T. - ION
6" MIN. SOIL COVER
AT RECLAMATION
WITH SEEDING
a OW NLMEN RECLAWITIC01 AND TEIppRARY BERM OEYAIL
N. T. S.
NOTE: RECLAIM MINED AREAS CONCURRENTLY WITH MINING OPERATIONS.
EMBANKMENTS ARE TO BE SLOPED AND SEEDED WHEN MINING
OPERATIONS ARE DISCONTINUED FOR 15 DAYS OR MORE IN ANY
PARTICULAR AREA.
RECLAIMAT[ON PON
WATER LEVEL
FFER
53753N87CSFSA1 .27TED UAC) CUT SLOE x-SECT ION
N.T.S.
SEED PER SEEDING Q�
g �xl SCHEDULE S\0
DfrCy 4 . N
PERMIT BOUNDARY FINAL DITCH STABILIZATION DETAIL
N.T.S.
o N/F CLYDE W. YOUNG III
2s, U DEED BOOK 397
MF PAGE 221
c' _ ' o�
S9s s V.
qG
xc� "`Q rF
0
QvF��R
NOTES:
NO WETLANDS EXIST WITHIN THE
PERMITTED BOUNDARY.
ALL EXCAVATION
OF PROPOSED MINE SHALL
BE DONE AS WET MINING AND NO DISCHARGE
OF GROUND WATER WILL BE ALLOWED.
TOCK PILE
TE 1 "RCA
ui
iy
25' BUFFER
Icc
MAX.
SIDE SLOPE = 3:1
OR GREATER
o
EXISTING GRADE
IN
TO'SD I L
11
a
00
I
a
I
p
a
�, SANQ .m.
I}
�� u, } $
<
��Q
A
l i
uj
a
u
�4
~�
ool
c
a
yo m
4,
:
9
S63�' 9�• 06
CUT SLOPE x-5ECTION
B,Q•`�q� N.T.S.
N/F GILBERT G COOPER. JR
F �*& �� DEED BOOK 5%
Tf HAUL ROAD 8. PAGE 24
0 ROCESSING AREA
ry (0.09 AC)
1
CONSTRUCTIONEENTRANCE
t�
N/F JOHN WAYNE BRYANT
t
u
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
EX151INU
ROAD
-I 8 RUN
ABC)
OEEPAG 00388236
``�� 1p T0F ENCE 20' SOIL ROAD
S
EX.C_HECK--DAM
e1 1s sf
5p.PR01'aSED
•,� � r-
1b FENCE�
25' i1NEXCAVATED BUFFER
53753.87 SF 11.27 AC I
0J•ti{, AC
PROPOSED GATE STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
REMAIN LOCKED
XGAVA�En BUFFER
TO
EX CET
�HAULINGDURING HOURS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
251 UNE
rw DITCH
�. SEEDING SCHEDULE
EIS
993.3
1 SEED BED PREPARATION
�
xw
• 0
0 �,
S'19' 5b00.04
.:
LIME----------------------------- 2 TONS/AC.
r
10-10-20------------------------- 1.000 LBS./AC
-
0-20-0----------------------------- 500 LBS./AC (AFTER SEEDING)
-
\ \
ASPHALT TACK--------'__-__-----__ -2D0 GAL./TON OF MULCH
NORTHSIDE TOP
SEEDING MIXTURE
J _ E'41s, D TCH
`� DITCH BANK EXPMTING GRAVEL
RD. (FEBRUARY 1 -APR I L 30 f
-''-
IZ.77 AC
t
TALL FESCUE----------------------- 50 LBS./AC
PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS--------- 10 LBS./AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED)---50 LBS./AC
LANDSCAPING MIXTURE
N/F JACKIE L. ROUSE ( MAY 1 -AUGUST31 )
`.
��\ 1
DEED BOOK 106$ I TALL FESCUE---------------------- 50 LBS./AC
\ N/F JOSEPH A.TUCKER JR
PAGE 59 WEEPING LOVEGRASS------------ 5 LBS./AC
DEED BOOK 29
- KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA(SCARIFIED)-----50 LBS-/AC
PAGE 2
;::::
••• BROWNTOP MILLET--------------- 25 L85.1AC
t
t
(SEPTEMBER 1 - JANUARY 31)
TYP ROAD WIDTH 20'FT ` TALL FESCUE------------------------- 60 LBS. /AC
t,
1,
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (UNSCARIFIED)--•- 60 LBS./AC
:=. RYE (GRAIN)---------------------- 25 LBS./AC
FOR SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER ADD 30 LBS./AC SERICEA LESPEDEZA
i
- AND 15 LBS. WEEPING LOVEGRASS.
(JANUARY 1 - MARCH 31 )
r ; COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (UNHULLED)-----20LBS. LBS./AC
4
(APRIL 1 - JULY 31}
a
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (HULLED)--------12 LBS,/AC
10' MAX. WITH WIRE
-
NOTES:
12 GAUGE WIRE. 6' MAX WITHOUT WIRE
N/F BILLY E.ROUSE
1. USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32' IN WIDTH AND A MINIMUM OF
MINIMUM I FILTER t
` DEED BOOK 553
2. USE L FILINE TER FWIRES ABRICHAI M• NIMUMSTAY SOF 3G'.IN 'WIDTH AND FASTEN
FILTER FABRIC FABRIC
t, PAGE 68 REVISIONS;
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES.
3. PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE -FASTER
EN
NCDOT 1056 t
TYPE 3. CLASS B
No. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
SELF ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
4. USE 6' POST WITH 3' DIAMETER. \
COMPACTED FILL
i .ACM 3-0.09 LDS STATE CQIIIlENT
1
1
2 scar s 25--10 SrATE
APPRO. DISTANCE 1.672' it s
• 3 ,� 7-aB-A� Af 1vT
FROM MINE. BOUNORY = REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 430, PAGE 117
`
SILT FENCE DETAIL
Il TO NC HWY 24 DEED BOOK 1006. PAGE 48
�1
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
MINING MAP
DOD"noW
1%1OUSE A POND
r. _ - _
•:.: NEWPORT TOWNSHIP, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CLIENT: BILLY ROUSE DESIGNED'
-
ROC
ADDRESS, 123 PETE RD.
--
NEWPORT. N.C. 28570 DRAWN:
, Pohl JCM
f���
•'�%91"CAR
-
0..•�ESSf.QIy.- PHONE. [phone] CHECKED:RDC
-SEAL STROUD ENGINEERING P.A. APPROVED:
}
60 30 0
60 120
RDC
�' i�3 ` *# 151A HIGHWAY 24
it AD CITY, N.C. 28557 DATE:
:��'••�;ti0r E?.•' ,;
SCALE: 1' = 60'
'+,9 ...NE..• .�+ ,• (252) 2 -7479 LICENSE NO_C-0847 1/1210
SCALE
NALD D. CULLIPHER P.E. V = 60'
TT -
s I 1 r r.r rs
t,. r , 's'T' fT i � �r {^i', T r'.
I
I. +r,yi ajrf
r r
! •
i e}
+ a t l,rrt 1 i
11 �i � i! ��
I, �
-i ! ii-' 1 I
�
,+�-.'+ ( 1 4 �'I, r5,•I','i `r.

WATER WELL
THIS IS A APPRO. LOCATIO
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
TYP
WATER SERVICE
THIS IS A APPRO. LOCATIO
/MARYAN STRIC LAND
' MCLEAN D/B/A
DEED BOOK 05�1 7
TYP / PAGE 00497
WATER SERVICE
THIS IS A APPRO. LOCATION ; ,�
C p F
T N WOODS p �
I NO DEVELOPMENT, VACAN ! �Gt 60'zITS
DF44 C'p
% �I pgGD 44 L
i
r A
v00 k3p ��n �4,1°
i b �
ONO,
r°�y }�
ce aokEe
S�9 NpS� j
A _
93 049S S
N/F /..-
WILLIAM AVERY
i' DEED BOOK 0448 / I
' PAGE 00474
WILLIAM AVERY
/ DEED BOOK 0383
PAGE 00193
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT-------Z
SHEET #1 OF 2
PROJECT #: PM M/625-3.DGN
-3
DESIGN FILE #:
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
N/F CLYDE W. YOUNG III
DEED BOOK 397
PAGE 221
EXISTING WOODS
•cS, NO DEVELOPMENT. VACANT
1- '
�• ��4,.
\ r
o,°o PERMIT BOUNDARY �1
cli ��':' •F'C,�V i
eta
i 1
l
PERMIT BOUNDARY
S a`'••. EXCAVATION AREA
J OHN WAYNE BRYANT �$ V0 ��'•., i2.75 AC)
DEED BOOK 1236 ���-
PAGE 388
� O ' - 8uFF
•
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFER h� Z5 UNr 4 W KFtI DT B©OK 12 6
52753.87 SF (1.21 AC) ry S JR AGE
PAG �Z
9 � ER �
joSE.PH A.
- BdOK EXISTING WOODS
DEEQ VACANT
PAGE 272 NO DEVELOPMENT,
N/F \ EXISTING WOODS T
KATHER I NE OBLESBY EXISTING WOODS NO DEVELOPMENT. _1YACAN� p- R� • -- 1
DEED BOOK 482 NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
PAGE 00048
u_- ---
- N/F
JACKIE L. ROUSES
DEED BOOK 1068
a KKR AR PAGE 59 1�
N/F N/F A, Tt1C
DONALD BRYANT ` DEF-QP lao , 926
WALTON JR PAGE 2-72
DEED BOOK 1000
PAGE 280
NOTES:
1) THE PRIVATE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET
OF EXCAVATION LIMITS ARE SHOWN
ON MAP.
2) TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X
AS CLASSIFIED AND SHOWN ON FEMA
MAP 3720(>33600J+ DATED 7/16103
3) ALL STRUCTURE WITHIN 500 FEET
OF THE MINING SITE ARE SHOW ON PLAN
ALL ADJOINTING PROPERTIES WITHIN 1000 FT
ARE ALSO SHOWN ON PLAN
4) TEMPORARY STOCKPILES AND WASTEPILES
SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO RECLAMATION.
ROAD WAYS AND DITCHES NOT WITHIN
EXCAVATION AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED
AND RETURNED TO EXISTING STATE.
5) EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING ARE STRICTLY
PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE.
6) NO FUEL TANKS OR OTHER CHEMICAL
REAGENTS SHALL BE STORED ONSITE-
7) EXISTING DISTURBANCE IN THE PROPOSED
25 UNDISTURBED BUFFER AREA SHALL BE
SEEDED AND ONLY THE PROPOSED HAUL ROAD
SHALL BE USED DURING MINING ACTIVITIES.
N/F
FRANK K COOPER
DEED BOOK 0596
PAGE 00025
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
00 50 0 100 204
MI I.J. I-]� .
SCALE:!o
N/F -A
BILLY E. ROUSE ,fn
DEED BOOK 553 o
PAGE 68
LEGEND:
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFER
TYP PRIVATE WELL Q
TYP WATER SERVICE
EXISTING WOODS
NO DEVELOPMENT, VACANT
N/F
GILBERT G COOPER
DEED BOOK 0569
PAGE 00024
TY
WATER WELL
THIS A APPRO. LOCATION
N/F
RICHARD C HOLT
KRISTY L ETUX
DEED BOOK 1241
PAGE 206
APPRO. D I STkNCE 1 , 672'
FROM MINE B]UNDRY
TO NC HWY 21 -
1� -�\i CA&����i�i
S S,0• , �+
, j•�
Y9 s r
r: -
SEAL • * •
= 13343
411110%
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
BOUNDARY AND PERMIT AREA
(INCLUDING HAUL ROAD)
5.02 AC
PROPOSED MINE AREA
(EXCAVATION AREA)
2.75 AC
PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN AREA
0.08 AC
PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREAS
0.12 AC
0.12 AC
PROPOSED WASTE AREA
UNEXCAVATED BUFFER AREA
1.21 AC
PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA
3.07 AC
I No, I BY I DATE 1
REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 430, PAGE 117
DEED BOOK 1006, PAGE 48 _
MINING MAP/ ADJOINING TRACTS
ROUSE Bv^'RRlnW qr"kOlr"
NEWPORT TOWNSHIP, CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA
CLIENT: BILLY ROUSE
DESIGNED:
ADDRESS: 123 PETE RD.
RDC
Vil �
NEWPORT, N.C. 28570
DRAWN-
JCM
PHONE, 252-726-6761
CHECKED
RDC
STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
APPROVED
ROC
t�
151A HIGHWAY 24
DATE
MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557
�(2 247-7 7
.�jj, ( IAo�
1/12/09
r-
SCALE
RONALD D. CULL R Pa
V =
100

i i=Mi-'lJiiAii Y 5! UI:ISE' 1 L t
SEEDED AFTER 15 DAYS
O 6' MIN. SOIL COVER
N SL��` �,. , AT RECLAMATION
/ S it S< \ WITH SEEDING
NATURAL SURFAC
-V / •4.\t,;-/ �R�C = 7 ,i�, y::. ub ap.,•.",� � vttti _ - _
C�J Q 10 ytiy� ?_�h.�..A':vy�11t- vti�t\;.{�lvu�ab�: �C a1."1�'�vS_v��a.lry 1-a11�i�_�1\.,]a_,.r-...
f� rt -
�� ''i OVERBURDEN RECLAMATION AND TEMORARY BERM DETAIL
EXISTING GRADE P �'`•'`~ `` mil% N.T.S.
N/F JERRY E SNAVELY /
�k NOTE: RECLAIM MINED AREAS CONCURRENTLY WITH MINING OPERATIONS.
DEED BOOK 1087 . ,na �t.�, t,, , _u .� �,. t,� a. ��•,�._, i�Nli\ . 1a_ EMBANKMENTS ARE TO BE SLOPED AND SEEDED WHEN MINING
i PAGE 14 OPERATIONS ARE DISCONTINUED FOR 15 DAYS OR MORE IN ANY
1 ION PARTICULAR AREA. 25` BUFFER
N/F LOIS P WHALEY N.T.S.MAX. SIDE SLOPE = 3:1 OR GREATER
\ DEED BOOK 430 RECLAIMATION PON XISTING GRADE
PAGE 117 WATER LEVEL - - a maw-- -- -
\ Sr: ; Cam` i` ' ..`5;:: L �ti �,,: . "� '`' C�`'• S':: SaY ; t.
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFER ;` •t cy t �, 3 :, ( r;;•;.:`
53753. 67 SF (1. 2T AG ) CUT SLOPE X-SECTION
.� Q / , y. t ; .. ` jtr` • ; `r �':: t• v: tN.� ir.^ ::ti
N.T.S. Q z QV •C'�' �L`ti: C�S`,��: ii�ti �'(:`'tr:: i'sv �r�+fit• ,Lr�'a+r:x
CL
,,,. O ,,' r•Y jt+ [ t+ t j Ss; C•,+"c':'i•;"tr;: .r•.•
`Q--
dLL
r "+!: L
SEED PER SEEDING
Q �O�c(`:"�r:r'�'''•>���;:s``';�:�s.:;�.:
0 5 • 4.. _ �:_..
o - F SCHEDULE S Q a t t, : •.��•=Sr4..S: } :•?r
♦! �� +j?�?i,` C;> Ate' •ti:C� t'?'; r.:t:.. :.. r,t•r. ~
eA uj>4 V .ts "rT•``'•�. r�•'•t•.`:t rr .� S j. L••1: (*1: (rs�tryr S+�.
x ,�P�s:'t..�'Y`c:,,zt s�C;M1..+..,':� 3;=s,-c. }.•c;'
4t .(•�:tr r .:`r • !'''ii C. � � f?;_.t:'•i'.'r [:.'t
r•. r, t�, i
Iyl% A, +1� 4 1 •tors;;.s�� r. }:•i•. rC.`�. �: :err--•:�;. (`.•L'�r: ♦: r,•- r •i } Y.j
. •a C�'t2:�Sti t:'• r�'s•S•r i'N C' a.�r`: f•.. t,
\M } �y w
PERMIT BOUNDARY FINAL DITCH STABILIZATION DETAIL
N.T.S.
cs9se.ss c �s, �� N/F CLYDE W. YOUNG III
c DEED BOOK 397
C/ GS 25.28 PAGE 221
108
GS 24.86
11 0_ GS 26.93FjQ
107
117 GS 24.89
111 GS 27.20 99a
cs 26.96 s��O • O CUT SLOPE X-SE�TIiN�._
N/F KATHERINE M OGLESBY \ _ 7 6 1(as
DEED BOOK 482 GS 24.79 1N.T.S.
\ N/F GILBERT G COOPER, JR
EVA; I l)Nl : RFA GS :5. PAGE 48 MrA36 F �xI`S% DEED BOOK 596
\ ' `' AC) US$27.29 LNG HAUL ROAD & PAGE 24
\ 11S 4jT ROCESSING AREA
Gs 27.06 C (0.09 AC)
134 133 0 1
s 2S. O• 112 119 GS 27.77 GS 2T.fi0 y G 5.83 ;
PERMIT BOUNDARY p 9 Gs zs.es GS 2T.25
5.2� • F y(C` �'+, GS 26.16 t o 13227.71 GS 26.46 ,
C PttE , ADD 50 STONE
\ O,9 4G 121 G. 27,31 AFtf-A 1 ° _ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
\ 4A GS 2T 46
2 F �� ' 1132T. 74 GS 27.54 EA 6
GS 111:11111i :!2S 28.24 137
N/F JOHN WAYNE BRYANT BGS
\ DEED BOOK 1236 '`� oSEp 15'
F. pRo� cuncE SOIL ROAp
c
u
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
PAGE 388 R SI1-T '� r � c, I} 6,
\ 131 EX.CHECK -pAM � `•:,;'
+'�4, 0 GS 27.14 D
.. >i2 504'j.0 sr ,
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
BOUNDARY AND PERMIT AREA
(INCLUDING HAUL ROAD)
5.02
AC
PROPOSED MINE AREA
(EXCAVATION AREA)
2.75
AC
PROPOSED SEDIMENT BASIN AREA
0.08
AC
PROPOSED STOCKPILE AREAS
0.12
AC
PROPOSED WASTE AREA
0.12
AC
UNEXCAVATED BUFFER AREA
1.21
AC
PROPOSED AFFECTED AREA
3.07
AC
EXISTING
ROAD
I & RUN
„ABC)
25' UNEXCAVATED BUFFE GS27.48 p',16 AC 1
\ 53753-87 SF (1.2T AC1 SF - ` PQOREMA�NGLflCKED STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
^XCAvpjED ,BUFFER MONITORING ► i\'W- INGDHOURS SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
r E
123 » - 25 UN EXYca NG 0 TCH WEAL ,�1 SEEDING SCHEDULE
SUMP I D x>:1 GS 27.23
\ PROPOSED DEWATER ING PUMP - Q .39 ` +\ SEED BED PREPARATION
\ I00 OPM M AEXNT BASIN 5�s80.04 ov \ .
S190
5 \ ► ti 1 L I ME----__--•-------------------- 2 TONS/AC.
36" CMP V NOTE: ALL MONITORING WELLS SHALL OBTAIN WELL PERMITS 10-10--20------------ ------------ 1,000 LBS./AC
BARREL RISER. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BE INSTALLED BY PROPERLY
'�--- - LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. I ONAL .
1 _ t � 0-20-0-------------------------_.._.__ 500 LBS. /AC (AFTER SEEDING)
' 40 LF 12" CMP ASPHALT TACK --------_---_--__.�_..___200 GAL. /TON OF MULCH
. - � � �, 1
NORTHSIDE TOP ! . _. SEEDING MIXTURE
\ _EX�S-SING pITC POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO EXISTING DITCH \ ! 1
_ DITCH BANK \ y �`, (FEBRUARY 1 -APRIL 30)
10, X 10' X 2' RIPRAP APRON ti; ; TALL FESCUE---------------------- 50 LBS./AC
\ \ \ ` l PENSACOLA BAH IAGRASS---•------10 LBS. /AC
KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (SCARIFIED)---50 LBS./AC
LANDSCAPING MIXTURE
t 4 i
\ N/F JACKIE L. ROUSE ► ( MAY 1 -AUGUST 31 )
\ DEED BOOK 1068 4 �� TALL FESCUE----------------------- 50 LBS./AC
NOTES: N/F JOSEPH A. TUCKER JR it PAGE 59 `� WEEPING LOVEGRASS------------- 5 LBS,/AC
1) THE PRIVATE WELLS WITHIN 500 FEET `
DEED BOOK 929 t �� KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA(SCARIFIED)----50 LBS./AC
OF EXCAVATION LIMITS ARE SHOWN LOC)�`ING CAP
ON MAP. \ 4 PAGE 272 � BROYVNTOP MILLET --------------- 25 LBS, /AC
2) TRACT IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X STEEL OUTER CASI 1
AS CLASSIFIED AND SHOWN ON FEMA (IF PLASTIC INNER CASING) \ }' � t 3� (SEPTEMBER 1 -JANUARY 31 )
MAP 3720633600J- DATED 7/16/03 �,A!(q SURFACE ti �� TALL FESCUE ---------------------- 60 LBS /AC
3) ALL STRUCTURE WITHIN 500 FEET �1� \,\; \ \�\�� ' + KOREAN OR KOBE LESPEDEZA (UNSCARIFIED)--- 60 LBS./AC
OF THE MINING SITE ARE SHOWN ON PLAN.
l i NEAT CEMENT GRORYE (GRAIN) ---------------------- 25 LBS. /AC
U"l;`=-�=•�•=;���• :_:�'!�.� " \ , � �
4) TEMPORARY STOCKPILES AND WASTEPILES ;: ;r: \ �._�� FOR SLOPES 2:1 OR STEEPER ADD 30 LBS./AC SERICEA LESPEDEZA
SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO RECLAMATION.
ROAD WAYS AND DITCHES NOT WITHIN r \ +� AND 15 LBS. WEEPING LOVEGRASS.
EXCAVATION AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED PELLETIZED BENTONITI' Y ` 4 `0
AND RETURNED TO EXISTING STATE. ` '1 (JANUARY 1 -MARCH 31)
5) EXPLOSIVES OR BLASTING ARE STRICTLY 1'x
COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (UNHULLED)------20LBS. LBS./AC
PROHIBITED ON MINE SITE. WELL CASIN i : ' \ 1. 1+' (APR[L 1 - JULY 31 )
6) NO FUEL TANKS OR OTHER CHEMICAL (2 OR LARGER DIA.) �.
REAGENTS SHALL BE STORED ONSITE. COMMON BERMUDAGRASS (HULLED) -------- 12 LBS./AC
7) EXISTING DISTURBANCE IN THE PROPOSED \\�a �� •; /. NOTES:
25' UND I STURBED BUFFER AREA SHALL BE r it • L BOREHOLE TO\ BE SIX INCHES LARGER
'\ ^' THAN OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF CASING. l N/F BILLY E. RODUE S
SEEDED AND ONLY THE PROPOSED HAUL ROAD=' : _,_ _:' : DEED BOOK 553 t
SHALL BE USED DURING MINING ACTIVITIES. f =_ r ��� 2. CASING AND SCREEN TO BE CENTERED
CLEAN WASHER, , \; IN BOREHOLE PAGE RR N SHpU�p T B ti, PAGE 68 REVISIONS
SAND DR GRAV L {: 3' TABOV MEA� HC�H ESEASONEO WATER ELEVEL. Na BY DATE DESCRIPTION
%, 4. CA P TIBL S JkN MAEERIACO TAINMENT
CHRONOLOGICAL SEQUENCE OF LAND DISTURBANCE ACTIVITY r_- .
G q E 1 ;4
B NG MOpNITpORgED.\L YgPeLE 1 +,
=�BL WA1dIt� S YING• `
1.) INSTALL STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE %�'� °�'�:� 5_ W H A D WITH HIGHLY
2.) ESTABLISH BUFFERS ,` "W�DD Iz I° IA p .OT i !y� ��� REFERENCE: DEED BOOK 430, PAGE 117
3.) CLEAR GRASSES AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL WELL SCREE ;, �t� ,; C D r N IN
DEED BOOK 1006 PAGE 48
4.) CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT BASIN ,I > l�,r', 6. WELL TO E A FO DE RE S ALE ` '
5.) DEWATER I NG ERj fhjjW,,j GAINST D� AG AFTER I MINING MAP
6.) EXCAVATE SAND MATERIAL'
7.) TRUCK SAND MATERIAL OFFSITE
8.) RECLAIM MINE SITEUSA-;, ]a nK
S'DO"'w"kOW POND
\� \ 10' MAX.. WI'TH� WIRE
NOTES: 12 GAUGE WIRE._.. 6' MAX WITHOUT WIRE
MONITORING WELL DETAIL 1, USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND A MINIMUM OF MINIMUM _.- FILTER NEWPORT TOWNSHIP GARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
6 LINE WIRES WITH 12` STAY SPACIN&. F I I TERW"F ABR I C FABRIC CLIENT, BILLY ROUSE
NO SCALE (LOCATION AS SHOWN ON PLAN)
SHEET * 2 OF 2
PROJECT *: PM 625-3
DESIGN FILE #:625/625-3.DGN
\ 2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36' IN WIDTH AND FASTEN NCDOT 1056 DESIGNED
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRES. -^ __ RDC
\ 3. PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE -STEEL TYPE. TYPE 3. CLASS B 11 ADDRESS, 123 PETS RD.
COMPACTED FILL 1 : }'- NEWPORT, N.C. 28570 DRAWN: JCM
� 4. USE 6 POST WITH 3 DIAMETER. __ � - ��,
�.>. ` r�� .{� ti`S �\�� ,*��i!!!!i'lI���I PHONE' 252-726--6761 C RDC
\ ......
SILT FENCE DETAIL♦��,,'trg'Q,;tiA�'► APPROVED
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 60 30 00 �1,� SHROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. RDC
�t 151A HIGHWAY 24
's * MOREHEAD CITY, N.C. 28557 DATE:
(215,�7�-�74792 1/12/09
SCALE: 1' = 60'
SCALE.,
�`�•9' RONALD D. CULLEP R Z 1" - 60"
�irfiliill9yr�1� 1�`
r1C:� 4