The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWQ0004893_Staff Report_20200608izeeo Y/�9/2-0 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality DWR Division of Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION Division of Water Resources NON -DISCHARGE APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM April 28, 2020 To: FRO-WQROS: Trent Allen / Mark. Brantley RECEIVEWDENWR From: Poonam Giri, Water Quality Permitting Section - Non -Discharge Branch JUN U B 2020 Non -Discharge ' Unit Permit Number: WQ0004893 Permit Type: Land Application of Resi a AWA 5 3 Exempt) Applicant: Campbell Soup Supply Company L.L.C. Project Type: Renewal Owner Type: Organization Owner in BIMS? Yes Facility Name: Campbell Soup Supply Company RLAP Facility in BIMS? Yes Signature Authority: Brett Dunson Title: Senior Director of Operations Address: 2120 NC 71 N, Maxton, NC 28364 County: Robeson Fee Category: Non -Discharge Minor Comments/Other Information: brett_dunson@.cainpbells.com Fee Amount: $0 -Renewal Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above -referenced application for your review, comment, and/or action. Within 45 calendar days, please take the following actions: ® Return this form completed. ® Return a completed staff report. ❑ Attach an Attachment B for Certification. ❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification. When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of this sheet, avid return it to the appropriate Central Office Water Quality Permitting Section contact person listed above. RO-WQROS Reviewer: � Rmo�lrr"L_ __ - Date: S Z9 Zlj FORM: WQROSNDARR 09-15 Page I of 1 State of North Carolina Im" Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section Environmental Staff Report Quality To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Attn: Poonam Giri From: Jim Barber Fayetteville Regional Office Application No.: W00004893 Facility name: Campbell Soup Supply Co. RLAP Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge f�y staff report to document the review of both non - discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they re applicable. I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No a. Date of site visit: 14 May 2020 b. Site visit conducted by: Jim Barber and Tony Honeycutt c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No d. Person contacted: Keith Osterman and their contact information: (910) 844-1202 ext. e. Driving directions: From Maxton take Hwy 71 North approx. 5 mile. Campbell Soup plant is on the right after crossing the Lumber River. Land application sites are behind the plant and along Modest Road and Oxendine School Road. 2. Discharge Point(s): N/A Latitude: N/A Longitude: Latitude: N/A Longitude: 3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Land application sites along Modest Rd/Oxendine School Rd are ad0acent to Gum Swamp. Classification: C River Basin and Sub -Basin No.: Lumber/LBR51 (14-5) Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Agriculture consisting of Bermuda pasture for cattle grazing, row crop farming and swine farms. II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS 1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit) Proposed flow: Current permitted flow: 2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If no, explain: 3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, please explain: 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, please explain: FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 6 5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, please explain: 6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, please explain: 7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: 9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B) Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme: 10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: 11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS 1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ORC: Keith Osterman Certificate #: LA-1005253 Backup ORC: Jeff Scott Certificate #: LA-996267 2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: Description of existing facilities: Land application of residual solids from the Campbell Soup Company processing lines consisting of screened vegetable pieces (carrot/potato peels and pieces, bean stems from roto-screen) and fine vegetable matter from DAF unit. Facility currently has a limit of 650 Dry Tons/year for land application. Proposed flow: N/A. No change in the permitted Dry Tons/yr of 334. Current permitted flow: N/A. Current facility permit allows for 334 Dry Tons/yr Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership, etc.) 3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: The existing fields have not changed nor has the surrounding areas. Current buffer maps are acceptable. 5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: The facility has a contract hauler remove DAF solids from an on -site holding tank approximately monthly for land application on Bermuda grass hay and plant pine trees. The larger vegetable pieces are removed by roto-screen (smaller than'/4" goes to the DAF unit). Larger than'/4" vegetable pieces are transported to local farmers to feed to cattle/goats/pigs. 6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 6 8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas. 9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, please explain: 10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If no, please explain: FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 6 11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If no, please complete the following (ex and table if necessary): Monitoring Well Latitude Longitude O 1 11 II O I II It O 1 it O I 11 O 1 /I O 1 it O I 11 C 12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: Annual reports for Campbell Soup have been reviewed for the past three years. No compliance issues observed. See comments at end of report on page 6. Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable. 13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: 14. Check all that apply: ® No compliance issues ❑ Notice(s) of violation ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.) If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place? Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If no, please explain: 15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑ Yes ®No❑N/A If yes, please explain: 16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A 17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 6 IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, please explain: 2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Item Reason 3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued: Condition Reason 4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued: Condition Reason 5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office ❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information ® Issue ❑ Deny (Please state reasons: ) 6. Signature of report preparer: � R'3"F? Signature of regional supervisor: �J) Imo^ , Z!�/ F�a Date: S Z 5 FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 6 V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS The Fayetteville regional office visited the Campbell Soup Company land application fields along Modest Rd and Oxendine School Rd, along with the fields behind the processing plant. All fields with Bermuda grass hay are in good to very good condition and are well managed. The fields designated with pine trees (loblolly) are well managed. Some pines trees are removed annually (thinning) to allow for proper growth and in some cases trees that exhibit pest infestation (pine beetles and the like) are removed as needed. The current buffer maps for all fields are correct for property line buffers, surface water buffers and residences in the area. The Campbell Soup Company land application program has approximately 57 acres of land in their program with this permit renewal. Based on the number of Dry Tons (DTs) applied for the past three years from the DAF unit (2017 to 2019 = 36, 155 and 241); application rates range from 0.7 DTs/ac to 4.5 DTs/ac. The acreage is adequate to manage the residuals generated by the processing of soup at the Campbell Soup facility based on the low nutrient content of the DAF residuals. Here are the PAN application rates for each crop of the last three years: 2019: Bermuda PAN rate ranged from 26 Ibs/ac to 147 lbs/ac (1101bs/ac to 2991bs/ac R.Y.E rates) 2019: Rye PAN was 6 lbs/ac (50 lb/ac second crop rate) 2019: Pine tree PAN ranged from 8 lbs/ac to 83 Ibs/ac (110 lb/ac R.Y.E) 2018: Bermuda PAN ranged from 3 lbs/ac to 64 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) 2018: Rye PAN ranged from 4 lbs/ac to 19 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) 2018: Pine tree PAN ranged from 14 lbs/ac to 21 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) 2017: Bermuda PAN ranged from 9 Ibs/ac to 15 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) 2017: Rye PAN ranged from 3 Ibs/ac to 9 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) 2017: Pine tree PAN ranged from 7 lbs/ac to 19 lbs/ac (same R.Y.E as 2019) FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT B - Approved Land Application Sites Campbell Soup Supply Company, L.L.C. Certification Date: July 30, 2015 Permit Number: WQ0004893 Version: 3.0 RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION AREA INFORMATION Field Owner Lessee County Latitude Longitude. A et Dominant Soil Series Crop- RYE Footnotes Site 1 Campbell Soup Supply Company, LL.C: Robeson 34.796431 -79.289683 5.1 Noboco (NbA) Row Varies 5 Site'.' Campbell Soup Supply Company,1.1.C. Robeson 34.793503 -79.297747 8.4 Goldsboro (Golf) Bermuda 299 1,6,10, Site 3 Campbell Soup Supply Company, L.L.C. Robeson 34.770956 -79.320014 26.0 Johns (Jo) Pine trees 60 1,7 Site 4 Campbell Soup Supply Company, L.L.C. Robeson 34.806189 -79.307846 9.1 ,/ Wakulla (WkB) Bermuda/Pine Trees 110150 1,2,3,4,8 Site 5 Campbell Soup Supply Company, L.L.C. Robeson 34.798947 -79.300616 3.4 ✓ � Wakulla (Wkll) Bermuda/Pine Trees 110/50 1,2,3,9 Site 6 Campbell Soup Supply Company, L.L.C. Robeson 1 34.793068 -79.299087 2.3 J Goldsboro (GoA) Bermuda/Small Grain 224/50 1,2,3,10 Site 7 Campbell Soup Supply Company, I..L.C. Robeson 34.790074 -79.301061 2,5 Goldsboro (GoA) Bermuda/Small Grain 224/50 1,2,3,10 Totals 56.8 l . For sites 2 through 7 residuals and other sources of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) -shall not be applied in exceedance of agronomic -rates. Appropriate agronomic rates shall be calculated using expected nitrogen requirements based on the determined Realistic Yield'Expectations (RYE) using any of the following methods: 2. Division's pre -approved site specific historical data for specific crop or soil types by calculating the mean of the best three ,yields of the last five consecutive crop harvests for each field. 3. North Carolina Historical Data for specific crop and soil types as provided by North Carolina State University Department of Soil Science (htta //www soil ncsu edu/programs/nmQ/ iy eldsn. A copy shall be kept on file and reprinted every five years in accordance with Condition III.2. 4. If the RYE cannot be determined using methods (a) or (b) above, the Permittee may use the RYE and appropriate nutrient application rates reported in any of the following documents: a. Crop management plan as outlined by the local Cooperative Extension Office, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, or other agronomist. b. Waste Utilization Plan " as outlined by the Senate Bill 1217 Interagency Group - Guidance Document: Chapter 1 (hM://www.enr. state.nc.us/DSWC/papes/igu dance docs.html). c. Certified Nutrient Management Plan as outlined by the Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS). These plans must meet the USDA NRCS 590 Nutrient Management Standards (ftn•//ffa-fc sc egov usda gov/NHO/practice-standards/standards/590 pdf) 5. See Buffer Map L: 6. See Buffer Map 2. 7. See Buffer Map 3. 8. See Buffer Map 4. 9. See Buffer Map 5. 10. See Buffer Map 6 WQ0003626 Version 3.0 Attachment B Page 1 of 1 Rrtalistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 2 of 4 (TV C. bs Eso rL43 0 7�1 REALISTIC ESTIMATED PHOSPORHUS. YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN REMOVAL CROP it FACTOR It RATE (LBS/ACRE) LB P,O,/ACRE) 4t tt - Bahiagrass (Hay) 5 Tons 46 230 57 88 Barley (Grain) 1.51 133 33 Bushels Caucasion/Old World 5.3 Tons 46 242 62 Bluestem (Hay) Common 5 Tons 46 230 61 F Bermudagrass (Hay) 186 ' , Corn (Grain) 0.79 147 82 Bushels Corn (Silage) 24 Tons 11.1 266 82 925 Cotton 0.08 74 19 Pounds Dallisgrass (Hay) -5 Tons 46 230 66 Fescue (Hay) 4 Tons 46 184 ' 63 Hybrid Bermudagrass 6.5 Tons ' 46 299 80 (Hay) , Hybrid Bermudagrass overseeded with 8.3 -Tons .46 380 . 112 Rescuegrass (Hay) Mixed Cool Season 2.8 Tons 46 127 39 Grass (-Hay) 110 Oats (Grain) � 1.17 129 : 28Bushels Orchardgrass (Hay) 2.8 Tons 46 127 40 4000 Peanuts 0 0 22 - Pounds Pearl Millet (Hay) 5.5 Tons 51 281 ' 73 . Rescuegrass (Hay) 4 Tons 46 184 45 https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 3 of 4 REALISTIC ESTIMATED PHOSPORHUS YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN REMOVAL CROP tt FACTOR j t RATE (LBS/ACRE) P,O,/ACRE) . 1t 1t Rye (Grain) 2.09 136 21 gushels 10.5 Small Grain (Silage) 11.4 120 57 Tons Sorghum (Grain) 65 CWT 1.78 116 49 20.5 Sorghum (Silage) 7.8 , 160 62 Tons Sorghum Sudan (Hay) 6.3 Tons 51 319 87 -Soybeans (Double 38 ' 3.91. 1'49 30 Cropped - Manured) Bushels Soybeans (Double 38 0 0 30 Cropped) Bushels Soybeans (Full 45 - 3.91 ` 176 36 Season -.Manured) Bushels -Soybeans (Full 45 0 0 36 Season) Bushels Timothy Grass (Hay) 0 Tons 46 0 0 0 Tobacco (Burley) 0.06 0 0 Pounds 3400 Tobacco (Flue Cured) 0.02 68 17 Pounds 91 Triticale (Grain) 1.53 - 139 30 Bushels Tropical Corn (Silage) 24 Tons 6.7 161 82 110 Wheat (Grain) 1.23 135 55 Bushels https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 1 of 4 s• =' EXTENSION V/www.ces.ncsu.edu) Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils The North Carolina Realistic Yield Database is the product of an extensive data gathering and review process conducted by NC,State University, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation Read More Start Here 1. SELECT A" COUNTY: Robeson County, NC https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 2 of 4 D fl�U S REALISTIC ESTIMATED PHOSPORHUS YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN REMOVAL CROP it FACTOR RATE (LBS/ACRE) (LBS ; 11 P,O,/ACRE) Bahiagrass.(Hay) 3.8 Tons 43 161 43 74 Barley (Grain) 1.47 109 28 Bushels Caucasion/Old World 4,Tons 43 172 48 .: Bluestem (Hay) Common 3.8 Tons 43 161 45 Bermudagrass (Hay) 174 Corn (Grain) 0.74 129 77 Bushels Corn (Silage) 0 Tons 10.7 0 0 800 Cotton 0.07 -56 _, 16 Pounds Dallisgrass (Hay) , 3.8 Tons 43 161 49 Fescue (Hay) 5 Tons 43 215 79 Hybrid Bermudagrass, 5 Tons 43 215 62 (Hay) Hybrid Bermudagrass , overseeded with 7.5 Tons 43 323 102 Rescuegrass (Hay) Mixed Coo`I Season 3.5 Tons 43 1.51 50 Grass (Hay) � - 94 Oats (Grain) 1.1 103 '24 Bushels Orchardgrass (Hay) 3.5 Tons 43 151 51 2700 Peanuts 0 0 15 Pounds Pearl Millet (Hay) 4.3 Tons 48 204 57 Rescuegrass (Hay) _ 4.5 Tons 43 194 51 https://realisticyields.ces.nesu.ddu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils �V_,. Page 3 of 4 REALISTIC ESTIMATED PHOSPORHUS YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN REMOVAL CROP i 1t FACTOR jt RATE (LBS/IACRE) (LBS PZO,/ACRE) 1t 1t 55 Rye (Grain) 1.93 106 18 Bushels Small Grain (Silage) 9 Tons 10.8 97 49 Sorghum (Grain) e 55 CWT 1.67 92 41 Sorghum (Silage) 0 Tons 7.5 0 0 Sorghum Sudan (Hay) 4.8 Tons 48 228 66 Soybeans, (Double 38 3.87 147 30 Cropped - Manured) = Bushels ; Soybeans (Double 38 0 0 30 Cropped) Bushels ? Soybeans -(Full 45 3.87 174 36 Season -` Manured) Bushels , Soybeans (Full 45 0 0' 36 Season), Bushels Timothy Grass (Hay) 0 Tons 43 0 0 ; 0 Tobacco (Burley) 0.06 0 0 Pounds Tobacco (Flue Cured) 2700 0.02 54 14 Pounds 77 Triticale (Grain) 1.5 116 25 Bushels - i Tropical Corn (Silage) 0 Tons 6A 0 0 100 Wheat (Grain) 1.06 106 50 Bushels The,NC Interagency Nutrient Management Committee (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/) is responsible for the development and maintenance of the Realistic Yield reporting tool. hops://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic.Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 1 of 4 EXTENSION V/www.ces.ncsu.edu) Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils The North Carolina Realistic Yield Database is the product of an extensive data gathering and review process conducted by NC State University, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture 'and Consumer Services, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Read More a Start Here 1. SELECT A COUNTY: Robeson County, NC https://realisticyields.ces.nesu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils /t osoco o 7v Z /o scoP11, Page 2 of 4 REALISTIC ESTIMATED YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN PHOSPORHUS REMOVAL CROP 11 FACTOR It RATE (LBS/ACRE) (LBS P,O,/ACRE) 11 1t Bahiagrass (Hay) 5 Tons 46 230 57 81 j Barley (Grain) 1.51 122 31 Bushels Caucasion/Old World 5.3 Tons 46 242 62 Bluestem (Hay) Common 5 Tons 46 230 61 Bermudagrass (Hay) 168 Corn (Grain) 0.78 131 74 Bushels Corn (Silage) 0 Tons, 11.1 0 0 875 Cotton 0.08 70 18 Pounds Dallisgrass (Hay) 5 Tons 46 230 66 Fescue (Ha) 3.5 Tons 46 161 55 Hybrid Bermudagrass 6.5 Tons 46 299 80 (Hay) Hybrid Bermudagrass overseeded with 7.8 Tons 46 357 105 Rescuegrass (Hay) Mixed Cool Season 2.5 Tons 46 115 36 Grass (Hay) Oats (Grain) 1.17 119 26 g sOhels Orchardgrass (Hay) 2.5 Tons .46 1.15 37 4000 Peanuts 0 0 22 Pounds Pearl Millet (Hay) 5.5 Tons 51 281 73 Rescuegrass (Hay) 3.5 Tons 46 161 40 https://realisticyields.ces.nesu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 3 of'4- REALISTIC ESTIMATED PHOSPORHUS YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN REMOVAL ; CROP it FACTOR RATE (LBS/ACRE)' (LBS 1 t P,O,/ACRE) I 4t it 60 F Rye (Grain) 2 09 125 20 Bushels Small Grain (Silage) 10 Tons 11.4 114 54 Sorghum (Grain) 55 CWT 1.78 98 41 Sorghum (Silage) 0 Tons 7.8 0 0 Sorghum Sudan (Hay) 6.3 Tons 51 319 87 r Soybeans (Double 38 3.91 149 30 Cropped - Manured) Bushels Soybeans (Double - 38 0 0 30 Cropped) Bushels Soybeans (Full 45 3.91 176 36 Season - Manured) Bushels ' Soybeans (Full 45 0 0 36 Season) Bushels Timothy Grass (Hay) 0 Tons 46 0 0 0 Tobacco.(Burley) 0.06 0 0 Pounds 3300 Tobacco (Flue Cured) 0.03 99 17 Pounds 84 Triticale (Grain) 1.53 129 28 Bushels Tropical Corn (Silage) 0 Tons 6.7 0 0 105 Wheat (Grain) 1.19 125 53 Bushels The NC Interagency Nutrient Management Committee (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu� is responsible for the development and maintenance of the Realistic Yield reporting. tool. https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils y Page 1 of 4 EXTENSION V/www.ces.ncsu.edu) Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils The North Carolina Realistic Yield Database is. the product of an extensive data gathering and review process conducted by NC State University, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Read More Start Here 1. SELECT A_COUNTY: Scotland County, NC https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 N lR�alistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 2 of 4 fit,/ A v-L CA 0— (P % 'REALISTIC ESTIMATED YIELD NITROGEN FACTOR NITR�OGENN RATE ' PHOSPORHUS REMOVAL CROP It It CLBS/AC (LEIS P,O,/ACRE) It It Bahiagrass (Hay) 2.9 Tons 50 F 147 34 Barley (Grain) 46 1.6 74 18 Bushels Caucasion/Old World 3.2 Tons 50 159 38 Bluestem (Hay) Common 2.9 Tons 50' i 147 36 Bermudagrass (Hay) 94 Corn (Grain) - 0.71 67 41 Bushels Corn (Silage) 0 Tons 12 0 0 Cotton 539 0.1'2 65 11 Pounds Dallisgrass (Hay) 2.9 Tons 50 147 39 Fescue (Hay) 0 Tons 50 0 0 Ybrid`=Budag':rass 48 - 3.9 Tons 506 Ha.y_)� ` Hybrid Bermudagrass overseeded with 4.4 Tons 50 221 60 Rescuegrass (Hay) Mixed Cool Season 0 Tons 50 0 0 Grass (Hay) 59 Oats (Grain) 1.3 76 15 Bushels Orchardgrass (Hay) 0 Tons 50 0 -0 t 2156 Peanuts 0 0 12 Pounds -Pearl Millet (Hay) 3.4 Tons 55 189 46 Rescuegrass (Hay) 2 Tons 50 98 22 https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/2k020 Realistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 1 0f.4-, � r` EXTENSION' V/www.ces.ncsu.edu) Realistic Yield Expectations for -North Carolina Soils The North Carolina Realistic Yield Database is the product of an extensive data gathering and review process conducted by NC State University, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the North Carolina Division of Soil and Water Conservation. Read More Start Here 1. SELECT A COUNTY: Robeson County, NC IV https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020 R-palistic Yield Expectations for North Carolina Soils Page 3 of 4 REALISTIC ESTIMATED YIELD NITROGEN NITROGEN PHOSPORHUS REMOVAL CROP 4t FACTOR t t RATE (LBS%ACRE) (LBS P,O,/ACRE) It it 34 Rye (Grain) 2.42 83 11- Bushels Small Grain (Silage) 5.9 Tons 12.5 74 32 Sorghum (Grain) 25 CWT 2 49 18 Sorghum (Silage) 0 Tons 8.4 0 0 Sorghum Sudan (Hay) 3.2 Tons 55 175 44 Soybeans (Double 18 4 71 14 Cropped - Manured) Bushels Soybeans (Double 18 0 0 14 Cropped) Bushels Soybeans (Full 22 4 86 17 Season - Manured) Bushels Soybeans( Full 22 0 0 17 Season) Bushels Timothy Grass (Hay) 0 Tons 50 0 0 0 Tobacco (Burley) 0.08 0 0 Pounds 1960 Tobacco (Flue Cured) 0.4 784 10 Pounds 48 Triticale (Grain) 1.48 71 16 Bushels .Tropical Corn (Silage) 0 Tons 7.2 0 0 78 Wheat (Grain) 1.05 82 39 Bushels c The NC Interagency Nutrient Management Committee (http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/) is responsible for the development and maintenance of the Realistic Yield reporting tool. https://realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu/ 4/29/2020