Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0003425_Comments_20160916Strickland, Bev From: Shell, Karrie-Jo <Shell.Karrie-Jo@epa.gov> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 7:49 AM To: Rodriguez, Teresa Cc: Diaz, Denisse; Davis, Molly; Zimmer, Andrea; Staples, Bridget Subject: RE: Roxboro Intake map Thanks for sending the updated map and flow schematic. I still have a few comments and recommendations for the permit. The permit should clearly state the sampling locations for all internal and external outfall. For instance, there is no sampling location mentioned for outfall 001. Also, for outfall 003, the permit refers to a map, but you cannot tell from the map the exact sample location. I recommend the permit list all the wastewaters that contribute to the outfall 006. Because one of the waste streams is truck wheel wash, I recommend an oil and grease limit or monitoring requirements for this outfall. Please clarify where the emergency overflow for the FGD treatment system goes; the fact sheet lists FGD emergency overflow as a waste stream. Is the emergency flow all collected and eventually treated in the bioreactor, or does some of it end up in the ash pond? If any FGD wastewater bypasses treatment and is sent directly to the ash pond, the outfall for the ash pond should include the EG for FGD wastewaters. The permit allows Duke until November 1, 2018, to meet the new effluent guidelines for fly ash and bottom ash sluice wastewaters (i.e., no discharge). Can you clarify if they are already doing dry ash handling for fly ash? The fact sheet suggests that they are. If so, then why is the extension to 2018? The permit is not specific regarding identification of new seeps. Other Duke permits referenced a Seep Identification Plan, which EPA has commented should be attached to the permit. Internal outfall 008 only requires annual reporting for both the existing flowrate and the expansion to 0.025 MGD. I recommend at least monitoring quarterly for one year after the expansion then reducing the monitoring to annually. The is a typo in the table for outfall 010. For arsenic, the sample type is misspelled. Karrie-Jo Robinson -Shell, P.E. Environmental Engineer US EPA Region 4 Water Protection Division 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 562-9308 From: Rodriguez, Teresa[mailto:Teresa.Rodriguez@ncdenr.gov] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:06 PM To: Shell, Karrie-Jo <Shell.Karrie-Jo@epa.gov> Subject: Roxboro Intake map Teresa Rodriguez Environmental Engineer NC Division of Water Resources NC Department of Environmental Quality 919 807 6387 office Teresa. rod riauez(a-)ncdenr.aov 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27669-1617 Nothing Compares.-,-.,. s..v Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.