NC0003425_Update of Renewal App_20141013

DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
October 13, 2014
Jeff Poupart, Chief
Water Quality Permitting Section
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Duke Energy Progress
ROXBORO STATION 1 1700 Dunnaway Road
Semora, NC 27343
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
NPDES Permit No. NCO003425
Person County
Update of Renewal application originally submitted on September 28, 2011
Dear Mr. Poupart:
The current NPDES permit for the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant expired on March 31, 2012. As
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (hereinafter "Duke) made timely application for renewal of the
subject NPDES Permit on September 28, 2011, consisting of EPA Application Form 1 —
General Information, EPA Application Form 2C — Wastewater Discharge Information and EPA
Application Form 2F — Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity, all in triplicate,
the site continues to operate under an administratively extended permit. Two additional
administrative updates have been submitted since the permit has been last issued. Those
updates were submitted on July 27, 2011 and March 30, 2012 respectively.
This update consists of:
1. An updated EPA Form 1. (The EPA Form 1 and Form 2F are also being submitted to
the NC DEMLR).
2. An updated line drawing showing water flow through the facility in accordance with
EPA Form 2C Item II -A. (An update to Attachment 3 in the September 2011
application).
3. An updated description of Flows, Sources of Pollution and treatment technologies in
accordance with EPA Form 2C Item II-B. (An update of Attachment 4 in the
September 2011 application).
4. An updated list of potential discharges not covered by analysis in accordance with
EPA Form 2C Item VI. (An update to attachment 5 of the September 2011
application).
5. A seep monitoring plan including site map, a summary of sampling analysis
conducted of seeps and a monitoring plan for seeps.
6. An updated ground water monitoring plan, receptor survey, and a generalized
ground water flow directional map.
Duke also hereby provides an additional update to EPA Form 2C Item VII as follows: Since
submission of the NPDES renewal application in September 2011, Duke has conducted an
additional 13 toxicity samples in accordance with the terms of the subject permit. None of the
tests exhibited toxicity at the required testing concentrations.

If you have any questions regarding the enclosed information please contact Shannon Langley
at [phone].
I certify, under penaltyof lain, that this document and all attachments ►vere prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible far gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties far submitting false information,
including the possibility offines and imprisonment for knowing violations,
Sincerely,
/1--;-1
Michael Mosle - Manager
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Enclosures
cc: Robert Howard
Shannon Langley — NC14

Update to Form submitted September 26, 2011
Please print or type in the unshaded areas only. Farm Aanro,red nUR Nn 7nAn-nnaf
FORM
U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1 EPA I D. NUMBER
.=.EPA GENERAL INFORMATION
F
Consolidated Permits Program
D
GENERAL
(Readihe Generallnaracrians bcfrreslarong)
, 12
u u n
LABEL ITEMS
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
If a preprinted label has been provided, affix a In the
designated space Review the Information carefully. if any of A
I EPA I.Q. NUMBER
Is incorrect, cross through it end enter the rbrrecl data in the
PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE
apprWrtate filWn area below Also if arty of the preprinted data
Is absent (the area to the left of tts isiw space fists the
lntormafion that should appear) please provide It in the proper
fill-in areas) below if the label is complete and correct. you
III. FACILITY NAME
V FACILITY MAILING
need not complete Items I III V and W (except Vf•B which
ADDRESS
must be compieted regardless) Complete as Items If no label
has been provided Rotor to the Instructions for detailed item
descriptions and for the legal authorizations under which this
V1. FACILITY LOCATION
data Is collected
II. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. It you answer 'yes' to any questions you must
submit this form and the supplemental form listed in the parenthesis following the question Mark 'X' in the box in the third column if the supplemental form is attached. If
you answer "no' to each question, you need not submit any of these forms. You may answer "no' it your activity is excluded from permit requirements see Section C of the
Instructions. See also Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold-faced terms.
Mak'r
eluk
7l'
YES
NO
FORM
arTACHEO
YES
NO
FORM
ATrACHFD
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works which
B Does or will this facility (either existing or proposed)
results in a discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2A)
X
include a concentrated animal feeding operation or
X
aquaUc animal production facility which results in a
is
I n
I ,s
,s
discharge to waters of the U.S.? (FORM 2B)
C Is this a facility which currently results in discharges to
waters of the U.S. other then those described in A or B
�/
X
�/
X
D Is this a proposed facility (other than those described in A
B in discharge
X
above7 {FORM 2C}
or above) which will result a to waters of
the U.S.? (FORM 2D)
xs
xs
xr
zx
a
N
E. Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of
F Do you or will you Inject at this facility industrial or
hazardous wastes? (FORM 3)
X
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum
X
containing, within one quarter mile of the well bore,
underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4)
„
a
IN
n
z
G. Do you or will you inject at this facility any produced water
H Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids for special
or other fluids which are brought to the surface in
processes such as mining of sulfur by the Frasch process,
connection with conventional oil or natural gas production,
X
solution mining of minerals, in situ combustion of fossil
X
inject fluids used for enhanced recovery of oil or natural
fuel, or recovery of geothermal energy? (FORM 4)
gas, or Inject fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons?
(FORM 4)
77
1 s
s
s,
ss
1 Is this facility a proposed stationary source which is one
J Is this faciliy, a proposed stationary source which is
of the 28 industrial categories listed in the instructions and
which will emit 100 tons
�/
X
NOT one of the 25 -ndustrial categories listed in the
X
potentially per year of any air
Instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons per
pollutant regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect
year of any air pd lutant regulated under the Clean Air Act
m
ti
n
N
u
u
or be located in an attainment area? (FORM 5)
and may affect or be located in an attainment area?
(FORM 5)
III NAME OF FACILITY
c
1
1,s
SKP
Ro oro Steam lectric Plant
n
ss
r. _ x.
IV FACILITY CONTACT
A. NAME d TITLE (last, first, & title)
B. PHONE (area aide & no.)
J2c
Mos eye Mike - Plant Manager
(3 )5 7-6 0
,s
,s
AS �s .s a s, s• x
V FACILTY MAILING ADDRESS
A STREET OR P O BOX
c
3 1 ob bunna,w,ay, Road
to
7
B. CITY OR TOWN
C STATE I D ZIP CODE
C 2 343
c s,
4
4c
Roxboro
,s
a
VI. FACILITY LOCATION
A. STREET. ROUTE NO OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
J5c 1 ob bu,n,away Road
,7 4
q
B COUNTY NAME
Person
C CITY OR TOWN
D STATE
E. ZIP CODE
F COUNTY CODE (tfkna,rn}
c
6
S m r
C
2 3 3
EPA Form 3510-1 (8.90) CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUFn FRn6A THE FRfWT
VII. SIC CODES 4 di it, in order ofpriority)
A. FIRST B. SECOND
{.rprch) Electric Power Services -
(vpec�j
4911
C. THIRD D. FOURTH
(rrrrhl
7
s
,a
T
Vill. OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAME B Is the name listed In Item
e Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Vill-A also the ownerf
0 YES ❑ NO
C STATUS OF OPERATOR (tinier the ap nipnare letter lnur the anaw'er bar if, 01her " sprufp)
D PHONE (area crwle R no.)
S a STATEAL M = PUBLIC (other than federal armari)
P (Tl cr1!}
P = PRIVATE 0 = OTHER (tperh)
A
E. STREET OR P.0 BOX
4 0 South i mington treet
r
F. CITY OR TOWN
G. STATE
H. ZIP CODE
IX INDIAN L.ANO
B
Raleigh
LNC
27601NC 27601
Is the facility located an Indian lands?
p YES m NO
1,
.,
, ,
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A. NPDES Discha cs nr Su act it irhr
0 PSD Air Fntisainn, nrm frnr urd.krurcer
t T ,
g p
t
g
T
N
i
NC0003425
u
to
,T
is
S. UIC Urpdr d4ecrranufF7urdT
E OTHER .r ectfi
pT
010 1 4 8
Title V Air permit
(`pLe,�'}
9
u
9
C. RCRA Ha anlnur H�sres
E OTHER a ecr ,11
C
T
C T
(vpl'C7fJ) State non discharge permit f-'.r a„h
9
1 R
g W00000020 reuse
17 t, 11 1 is n
Xi. MAP
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must show the outline of the facility. the
location of each of its existing and proposed Intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where It
Injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers. and other surface water bodies in the map area. See Instructions for precise requirements
XII NATURE OF BUSINESS vide a brief descrilion
Electric utility - This facility is an electric generating facility consisting of four coal fired units with a
total generating capacity of 2558.2 Megawatts.
XIII CERTIFICATION (see instructions)
I certify under penalty of law that I have personalty examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all attachments and that based on my
inquiry of those persons Immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the application, I believe that the information is true, actuate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penaNies for submitting false information. including the possibility of Fine and imprisonment.
A. NAME 8 OFFICIAL TITLE (qpe ar print)
8 SIGNATURE
C DATE SIGNED
Mike Mosley, Plant Manager
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
r
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
c /
C
,s x
EPA Form 351G-1 (9-90)

i U. a a
H 0
—� corgi mc'Sg
�C7 y ►. h O a`� a
Z o o uJ
o 0 H c0 C
a 7v a)4 n� m� i7 p-y C CO
o LL c u) E c
i U. � w �m� 0
aci L ; Ec)
ma d 5 3 w Q'c
_ C ._
Of .. UI
3 CDw d :....� OC1 c p m H
NL 3 W O CO
to o co c?N
d cm 0. O = D
H u, CO c G
T
N
Q y �
C 0
eh m L p
m I O C
N E� T
o o
QLLU) IL
0 2
t
�
m
4
CV)R1
C
O
C
t7—
°a i
to
—
y C
C7 N
G
rA .0V
y
G1
J C
O
y
G
7
O
3
a
CL
Y
U O
W
a2.2
in
co
2
�
..�.......................
.............................
CD
C
0
co
m E
E
U
j(n
N
>
f y,
V1
N
•C
3m
Q
(D
w
L
J 0
G
m
`
C
Q
o
W
N
0
0
U
[]
'j Q
C
O
—
7 C
_
t
C
U)
c �m0
0
m
QO
c'n
Q
�co �� )
Ea
w
0) rn
_
g •-
'
Q? d7
C 4=. -2-
TO a• c
0 as
U 3
3E 0
U
c o E
u In
0 CL
W ID
T
f6
N CS CI
c •E M N ro
CD m °o 0 °o m 1 a�
rf7 U U Q
U T
2 m 2 L0 m E¢ �
,h r a
Q m ao
aiorusSO�j OoAH WOJJ

Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0003425
Attachment 3
Form 2C — Item II -A - Flow, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
Stream
Estimated�Average Flow
Comments
A
4
505
Make-up water for Water Treatment Systems
B
Unit 3 Cooling Water Intake
C
592
Units 1 & 2 Cooling Water Intake
D
7
Unit 4 Cooling Tower Blowdown
E
505
Unit 3 Cooling Water Discharge
F
17.3
Unit 4 Cooling Tower Intake
G
505
Unit 3 Cooling Water Discharge
H
0.015
3
12
0.17
15
Sewage Treatment Plant Discharge
1
Low Volume discharge into Ash Pond
J
Ash transport into Ash Pond
K
Silo wash water
L
Ash Pond discharge into Discharge Canal and
small dam drainage
M
1067
Discharge Canal flow into Hyco Lake
N
0.09
Coal Pile Runoff Pond discharge to Hyco Lake
O
1.92
Flue Gas Desulfurization Discharge
Intake to Flue Gas Desulfurization
P
5.81 (maximum)
2 October 2014

Attachment 4
Form 2C - Item II-13 Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
Introduction
The Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, located in Person County, North Carolina, consists
of four coal fired generating units with nameplate generating capacities of 410.8, 657,
745.2, and 745.2 MWe for units 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. All plant waste streams are
routed directly or indirectly to the Hyco Reservoir. Chemical constituents contained in
these discharges will, in part, be representative of the naturally occurring chemical
quality and quantity of the intake water and will also have chemical constituents of such
quality associated with similar discharges for fossil generating facilities of this size, type,
and in this geographical location. Either all or part of the elements in the Periodic Table,
either singularly or in any combination, may from time to time be contained in the
discharges. Each component of the discharges is described below.
Outfall 003 — Effluent Channel
At the point that the effluent channel enters the Hyco Reservoir, it contains the flows
from several waste streams, including once -through cooling water, stormwater runoff,
and the effluent from the ash pond, which in turn receives and treats combined flows
from the ash transport system, the low volume waste system, the dry fly ash handling
system, cooling tower blow down, stormwater runoff, drainage from the ash landfill, east
ash pond, various seepage flows and from occasional wastewater piping leakage.
Once -Through Cooling Water
Condenser Cooling Water (CCW) for Units 1, 2, and 3 is drawn from the Hyco
Reservoir via an intake canal and discharges to the Hyco Reservoir via a effluent
channel. Flows for Units 1, 2, and 3 are 249 MGD, 342 MGD, and 505 MGD
respectively. Cooling is accomplished by evaporation from the surface of cooling
water in the effluent channel, cooling towers, mixing and convection with Hyco
reservoir waters.
actober 2014 Page 1

During the summer months, Unit 3 CCW is routed through mechanical draft
cooling towers where most of the waste heat is removed by evaporation before
the water is discharged to the reservoir via the effluent channel along with the
CCW of Units 1 and 2. Additionally, once -through cooling water is used for heat
exchange of component closed cooling water, the flow of which is combined with
the CCW prior to introduction into the effluent channel.
Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater, which flows into the discharge canal includes runoff from the
plant drainage area, the drainage area from the dry fly ash handling system
(including roadways), Unit 4 cooling tower drainage area, the fuel oil storage
containment area, the switchyard drainage area, the anhydrous ammonia tank
farm, and the gypsum storage pile area.
Ash Pond Discharae
The ash pond receives ash transport water, low volume wastes, runoff from the
ash landfill, landfill leachate, dry fly ash handling system wash water, blow down
from Unit 4 cooling tower, coal mill rejects and pyrites, and sewage treatment
plant effluent. The pond provides treatment by sedimentation, oxidation,
neutralization, equalization, adsorption and chemical precipitation. The following
flows are routed to the ash pond treatment system:
1. Ash Transport Water
Water for sluicing ash to the ash pond is withdrawn from the CCW system
as needed. The plant will primarily supply ash sluice water from Unit 2.
However, the facility will continue to maintain the ability to operate the unit
4 ash sluice pumps. The Unit 4 ash sluice pumps are and will continue to
be utilized for the following i) during maintenance draining of the cooling
tower, ii) back-up supply for the fire suppressant system, and iii) ash
October 2014 page 2

sluicing pumps during operational events which require additional
pumping. Normally, only bottom ash is conveyed to the ash pond by
sluicing. Fly ash is handled dry by a pneumatic system and is land filled
on site or sold. If the dry fly ash handling system is out of service during
plant operating periods, fly ash will be sent to the ash pond via the ash
sluicing systems until the dry system is restored. Such occurrences are
expected to be infrequent and brief.
2. Silo Wash Wafer
Ash silo wash water runoff, stormwater from around the ash silos and dust
suppressant spray runoff from the dry fly ash handling system are routed
to the ash pond.
3. Low Volume Wastes
Boiler make-up water is withdrawn from the intake and filtered, softened,
and de-mineralizered for treatment. This process includes treatment via a
process water reverse osmosis system. Boiler water is treated with
ammonia, hydrazine, phosphate and occasionally sodium hydroxide.
Boiler blow down is sent to the ash pond via the low volume wastes
collection system (LVWS). These are special drains in the plant that flow
by gravity to collection sumps and are pumped to the ash pond. Ethylene
glycol is used for freeze protection of some equipment and may be
discharged to the LVWS, as is some molybdate waste from the closed
cooling water system, during periods of maintenance. When this
equipment is rinsed, small amounts of these chemicals are discharged to
the low volume system via the neutralization basin. The plant's Reverse
Osmosis system produces a reject wastestream of approximately 250
gpm, when in operation. Essentially all plant equipment, floor drains,
water treatment filter backwashes, clarifier and sedimentation basin
sludge, and ash hopper seal water overflow also discharge to the LVWS.
Plant drains around oil containing equipment are routed to an oil/water
October 2014 Page 3

separator for treatment prior to being sent to the ash pond via the LVWS.
Various boiler sediments and ash accumulations collected during
maintenance activities may also be transported to the ash pond or the
onsite ash landfill. Seepage through the ash pond dam may be released
to the effluent channel.
4. Cooling Tower Blow down
Unit 4 is the only unit that produces cooling tower blow down. A blow
down stream is used to maintain concentrations of total dissolved solids in
the cooling tower to within proper operating limits. Make-up to the Unit 4
cooling tower is from the Heated Water Discharge Canal.
5. Domestic Sewage
Domestic sewage is treated by an extended aeration treatment plant
consisting of a screen, comminutor, surge tank, aeration tank, clarifier,
chlorine contact chamber, and a sludge holding tank.
6. Air Preheater Cleaning (Low Volume Wastel
The air preheater will be water washed once per year or more frequently
as needed. The wastewater from this activity will be discharged to the ash
pond.
7. Chemical Metal Cleaning Wastes
The boilers are chemically cleaned approximately every five -to -eight years
as required using Tetraammonia ethylene diamine tetraaccetic acid
(EDTA) solution or citric acid. This cleaning solution and its rinses are
stored on site for disposal by evaporation in an operating unit's furnace.
Should evaporation not be used, the wastewater can be treated by
neutralization and precipitation prior to being conveyed to the ash pond.
October 2014 page 4

Alternatively, the wastewater can be disposed by other acceptable
disposal methods. Cleaning of other heat exchanger surfaces may
produce 5,000-10,000 gallons of wastewater approximately every three -to -
five years.
B. Flue Gas Desulfurization Blow down Low Volume Waste
The Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system directs flue gas into an
absorber where limestone (calcium carbonate) slurry is sprayed. Sulfur
dioxide in the flue gas reacts with the limestone slurry to produce calcium
sulfate (gypsum). The system reclaims any un-reacted limestone slurry to
be reused in the absorber. A small blowdown stream is used to maintain
the chloride concentration in the reaction tank. The blowdown stream is
discharged to a gypsum settling pond where suspended solids are settled
out prior to entering a bioreactor. The bioreactor utilizes microbes to
reduce targeted soluble contaminants to insoluble forms that then
precipitate from solution. The treated wastewater enters the ash pond
effluent channel prior to outfall 002.
9. Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) System Blow down Emergency
Overflow/Pipeline Drain
Emergency overflow from the FGD System blow down will discharge to
the ash pond. If the FGD System blow down pipeline requires emergency
draining, the contents of the pipeline will be drained to a sump that is
pumped to the ash pond.
10. Ash Landfill Drainage
Water for sluicing a minimum amount of bottom ash to the ash landfill is
withdrawn from the ash transport system as needed. The bottom ash is
used to enhance the subsurface drainage of the landfill.
October 2014 Page 5

The facility may transfer settled ash from the west ash pond to fill
remaining capacity in the east ash pond as needed. This activity may be
undertaken to provide treatment capacity (i.e. volume) in the active, west
ash pond and or in preparation for landfill expansion in accordance with
permits issued through the NC Division of Solid Waste.
11. Stormwater Runoff
The stormwater runoff, which flows into the ash pond includes runoff from
the plant drainage area, landfill runoff (including silo area drainage), and
the drainage area from the ash pond (including roadways).
12. Seepage
Small seepage flows through engineered drainage features in the ash
basin dam and other points on the property comingle with the ash pond
discharge and cooling water discharge.
4utfa11006 — Coal Pile Runoff
Runoff from the coal pile, limestone pile, small potential gypsum pile on the west side of
the plant, truck wheel wash and other coal handling areas of the plant is routed to a
retention pond for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization. The
pond is designed to store in excess of the 10-year/24-hour storm event. Releases are
controlled by a standpipe structure. Approximately 0.006 MGD of wheel wash water will
be sent via gravity drain to a solids settling basin. Solids from the wheel wash will
accumulate in a separate settling basin to be removed by front end loaders and sent to
the onsite landfill. Water from the settling basin will go to outfall 006.
Stormwater from the FGD and Fuel Handling maintenance area located west of the coal
pile flows to the coal pile runoff pond.
October 2014 Page 6

Attachment 5
Form 2C - Item VI Potential Discharges Not Covered By Analysis
Chemical
Quantity
(Estimates)
Frequency
Purpose
Anhydrous Ammonia
14,000 gallwk
per unit
As required
Flue Gas Conditioning
Nalco 8338
385 gallons
As required
Corrosion Inhibitor
Nalclear 8173
(flocculant)
250 Ibs
As required
Water Treatment
H-130 (Microbiocide)
2300 gallons
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Algae Control
Nalco 71 D5 Plus
(Antifoam Agent)
630 gallons
As required
Unit 4 Cooling Tower
Foam Control
Nalco 7396
(Polyphosphate)
110 gallons
Twice per day
Corrosion Inhibitor
Potable Water
Ice Free Conveyor
(Propylene glycol)
750 gallons
2100 Ibs
As required
Conveyer Belt Freeze
Protection
Aluminum Sulfate
4000 gallons
As required
Water Treatment
Sodium Chloride
100,000 Ibs
As required
Softener Regeneration
Ethylene Glycol
6,000 gallons
As required
Freeze Protection Hot
Water Coil System
Lime
2,500 Ibs
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Hydrazine
1,760 gallons
As required
Feedwater Oxygen
Ammonia Hydroxide
1,760 gallons
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hydroxide
200 Ibs
As required
Boiler Water pH Control
Sodium Hypochlorite
400 gallons
Twice per day
Potable Water
Treatment
BT-210W
40,000 Ibs
(estimated)
As required
Dust Suppressant
Sodium Bicarbonate
20,000 Ibs
As required
Wastewater pH Control
Chemical
Quantity
(Estimates)
Frequency
Purpose
October 2014 Update

Caustic Soda (20%)
110 gallons
Twice per day
Potable Water pH
Control
Sanuril Tablets
135 Ibs
As required
Biocide for Sewage
(Calcium Hypochlorite)
Treatment
Nalclean
200 lbs
As required
Softened Water System
Sodium Carbonate
8,000 lbs
As required
Air preheater wash
water neutralization
EDTA
69,000 lbs/boiler
As required
Boiler Cleaning
A300
50 gallons/boiler
As required
Boiler Cleaning
(Chelating Agent)
M045 Silicone
15 gallons/boiler
As required
Boiler Cleaning
Antifoam Agent
GEOMELT
87,000 gallons
Winter months
Anti -icing Fluid for Coal
per month
BT-930
87,000 gallons
Winter months
Anti -icing Fluid for Coal
per month
Limestone (calcium
492,000 tons
Continuous
Flue Gas
carbonate)
Desulfurization
EN/ACT 7880
As needed
As Required
Coagulant for
Coal Pile Runoff
Sodium Hydroxide
1270 lbs.
As required
RO cleaning
(Approximately 1-3
months)
Hydrochloric Acid
1871 lbs.
As required
RO cleaning
(Approximately 1-3
months)
RO Clean P111
675 Ibs
As required
RO cleaning
(Avista detergent
(Approximately 1-3
cleaner)
months)
RO Clean P112
675 lbs.
As required
RO Cleaning
(Avista detergent
(Approximately 1-3
cleaner)
months)
October 2014 Update

Chemical
Quantity
Frequency
Purpose
(Estimates)
Citric Acid
675 lbs.
As required
RO Cleaning
(Approximately 1-3
months)
Sumaclear 1000
6 gallons per day
Continuous
Filter aid
(Poly aluminum
chloride)
Vitec 3000
5 gallons per day
Continuous
RO antiscalant
(Avista Antiscalant)
Phosphate (Nalco BT
As needed
Internal Boiler
3400 or similar)
Treatment
Nalco ST70
25 gallons per day
As needed
Biofouling cotrol in
per unit
cooling system
Nalco 7766 Plus
250 gallons per year
As needed
Polymer used in water
treatment process
Nalco 90005
5000 gallons per year
As needed
Biocide used in cooling
tower
Hydrated lime
20,000 tons per year
Continuous
S03 mitigation
Hydrogen peroxide
As needed
As needed
H2S mitigation and
oxegenation of
Bioreactor eff lent
Alum
As needed
As needed
Aid settling in ash pond
Anodamine
As needed
As needed
Boiler layup
Sodium Bisulfite
As needed
As needed
Bioreactor ORP control
0.04 and 0.10 lbs per
As needed
Boiler slag control
Coaltreat 120
ton of coal
Clean Coal
0.4% per coal ton
Continuous
Nitrous oxide control
M45-PC Additive A
October 2014 Update

Clean Coal
0.0005% per coal ton
Continuous
Mercury control
M45-PC Additive B
Flogard
20 GPD
Continuous
FGD make up water
MS6201
piping corrosion control
Gengard
10 GPD
Continuous
FGD make up water
GN8004
piping deposit control
Mercontrol
240 GPD
Continuous
Mercury re emission
8034 Plus
control
Nalco
10 GPD
As needed
FGD absorber foaming
60103
control
Coaltreat 300
1.1 lbs. per ton of coal
Continuous
Boiler slag control
Magnesium
reclaimed
Hydroxide
Coaltreat 600
1.4 lbs. per ton of coal
Continuous
Boiler slag control
Calcium Carbonate
reclaimed
Coaltrol 60
.0034 gallons per ton of
As needed
Dust suppression
coal unloaded
Coaltrol 35
.50 gallons per ton of
As needed
Dust suppression
coal reclaimed
Nalco 7330
5 gallons per
As needed
Closed cooling water
application
treatment
October 2014 Update

trip
syn,T(erra
SEEP MONITORING REPORT -
AUGUST 2014
FOR
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD
SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343
PERSON COUNTY
NPDES PERMIT ##NC0003425
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
(� DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014
�,+�HjOs� I�I1Ny,r
x
SEAL •
1425
. A.
']errgllyll C 28 sit��I�'
eoloi'st,,,t
s�
�1C E IVS�P
w � �
SEA f
' L
32 T
.i�W•1328

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
2.0 Seep Monitoring.............................................................................................................. 2
2.1 Seep Identification..................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement........................................................................................... 2
2.3 Seep Sample Collection............................................................................................. 3
3.0 Recommendations...........................................................................................................4
List of Figures
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Identified Seeps and Water Quality Sample Locations
List of Tables
Table 1- Seep Locations and Descriptions
Table 2 - Seep Flows and Analytical Results
Table 3 - Analytical Parameters/Methods
List of Appendices
Appendix A - Analytical Sample Handling, Preservation and
Holding Time Requirements
Page 1
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following report summarizes an evaluation of the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
(Roxboro Plant) seepage flow surrounding the ash basins toward Hyco Lake. The
evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential seeps followed
by the collection of flow measurements and representative water quality samples at
select locations. The site reconnaissance was conducted during March 2014.
Representative seep locations were evaluated for water quality and flow rates on
August 25 and 26, 2014.
Wastewater discharges from the ash basins are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003425. The purpose of the evaluation was to determine additional
potential outfalls for inclusion within the permit.
Eleven seep locations were originally identified during wet weather conditions in early
spring of 2014. However, of those 11 identified seeps, only six locations contained
sufficient water for water quality sample collection in August 2014. Three additional
seeps were sampled in August 2014. Eight of the seeps are located upstream of NPDES
Outfall 003 to Hyco Lake. The remainder of the seeps are located upstream of the
intake canal.
The low volume of water characteristic of the seeps coupled with the relatively low
constituent concentrations in the samples, suggest that the seeps have little potential to
influence water quality of Hyco Lake. The combined flow of all measured seeps is 0.03
million gallons per day. The typical NPDES wastewater flow for the Roxboro Plant is
1.07 billion gallons per day. If reasonable analyses demonstrate that the seeps have no
potential to exceed water quality standards, then Duke Energy proposes to re-evaluate
the seep locations listed in this document annually over the next 5-year permit cycle.
These annual evaluations would be documented and would verify the condition of the
existing seeps and determine the presence of new seeps. DWR will be promptly
notified if any new seeps are identified or any significant changes are observed for the
existing seeps. If any existing or newly identified seeps are determined to reach Hyco
Lake and the seepage has reasonable potential to exceed a water quality standard, Duke
Energy will take measures to either (1) stop the seepage, (2) capture and route the seep
so that it is discharged through a NPDES permitted outfall, or (3) address the seep
using Best Management Plans approved by DWR.
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
(Roxboro Plant) located in north -central North Carolina near Semora, North Carolina.
A large part of the Plant area encompasses Hyco Lake. The Roxboro Plant is located in
Person County along the east bank of Hyco Lake north of Roxboro, NC and west of
McGhees Mill Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Roxboro Plant began operations in 1966. Additional units were added in 1968,
1973, and 1980. Throughout its operational history, the Roxboro Plant has employed
coal-fired units to produce steam. Ash generated from coal combustion is stored on -site
in ash basins (the 1966 semi -active East Ash Basin and the 1973 active West Ash Basin).
Wastewater discharges from the ash basins are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003425.
This report summarizes an evaluation of seepage flows from the Roxboro Plant ash
basins. The evaluation included a detailed site reconnaissance to identify potential
seeps, flow measurements of identified seeps, and collection of seep water and other
surface water with chemical analysis of collected samples. The site reconnaissance was
conducted in March 2014. Seep sampling and flow measurements were completed on
August 25 and 26, 2014.
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026 \ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables\ Roxboro \ Seep Report\Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
2.0 SEEP MONITORING
2.1 Seep Identification
A detailed reconnaissance of the outside perimeter of the ash basins at the Roxboro
Plant was conducted in March 2014 for the purpose of identifying and locating potential
seeps originating from the ash basins. Identified seeps were described, photographed,
noted on a field map, and surveyed as to location using GPS (Table 1). Identified seeps
were further evaluated on August 25 and 26, 2014. During the August evaluation, it
was observed that some of the seeps identified during the initial reconnaissance were
dry, reflecting an intermittent or seasonal nature. The locations of seeps identified are
presented on Figure 2.
2.2 Seep Flow Measurement
Flow measurements were made in August 2014 at water -bearing seep locations using
either a Son-Tek FlowTracker ® Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter or the timed -volumetric
method. The FlowTracker® measures stream velocity and discharge using sound
waves. The timed -volumetric method was used at six locations where the flow was
constrained in a location that prevented the FlowTracker® from recording a signal
without interference. One location did not have sufficient flow to measure a flow rate.
The timed -volumetric method was employed by collecting a volume of water from the
flow of the seep directly into an appropriately sized container (graduated cylinder or
bucket). The entire seep flow was routed to the container. The amount of time (in
seconds) required to collect a known volume of water was recorded. A minimum of
five timed volumes were recorded and the flow rate for the seep was calculated based
on an average of the timed volume measurements.
The FlowTracker® was used to measure seep flows at two locations. The method is
designed for streams that can be waded following established procedures such as the
U.S. Geological Survey standards. Use of the FlowTracker® was generally limited to
channels of sufficient width (approximately 0.5 feet or greater) and depth
(approximately 0.17 feet or greater). Flow measurements (water velocity and depth)
within quality control bounds of the instrument were recorded manually for estimation
of discharge at a seep.
Locations were selected where channel banks were fairly parallel. The channel width
was measured at the water line and recorded. If the channel width was less than one
foot, the average depth was recorded and three velocity measurements were taken. The
average of the three velocity measurements and the channel volume (depth and width)
were used to calculate the flow rate at a given location.
Page 2
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
If the channel width at the water line was between 1.0 and 2.5 feet, velocity and depth
were recorded at a minimum of three locations spaced evenly across the channel. If the
channel width was between 2.5 and 5 feet, velocity and depth were recorded at a
minimum of five evenly spaced locations.
Consistent with USGS methodology, velocity measurements were collected at 60% of
water depth.
The averages of the calculated flows (in MGD) for seeps with measurable flow in
August 2014 are included in Table 2. Seepage flow is generally variable. Flow may
increase or decrease depending on the amount of rainfall, groundwater levels, weather
conditions, and other variables.
2.3 Seep Sample Collection
Eight locations with sufficient water for sample recovery were sampled during August
2014 for water quality analysis. The sample locations are described in Table 1 and
shown on Figure 2.
To prevent dilution from stormwater runoff into seep flows, seep samples were
collected during a period preceded by low precipitation. For the week preceding the
August sample collection, 0.37 inches of rain fell in the area as recorded at the Person
County Airport (Roxboro, NC), located about ten miles south-southeast of the Roxboro
Plant.
Samples were collected from the seep flows directly into sample containers. Care was
taken to avoid disturbing and entraining particulate soil and sediment. During sample
collection, in -situ field parameters (temperature, pH, and specific conductance) were
measured utilizing a YSI Pro Plus multi -function meter. Turbidity was also measured
in the field using a Hach 2100Q turbidimeter.
Laboratory analyses were conducted by Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory and Pace
Analytical Laboratories (NC Wastewater Certifications #248 and 12). A summary of the
laboratory and field data is provided in Table 2. A listing of analytical parameters and
associated methods are included in Table 3. Sample handling, storage, and
preservation methods are summarized in Appendix A.
Page 3
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

Seep Monitoring Report October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The very low flow of water characteristic of each seep location, including a number of
seep locations that only flow during periods of wet weather, suggests minimal potential
to influence water quality in Hyco Lake. If ongoing analyses demonstrates that there is
no potential to exceed water quality standards, Duke Energy proposes to re-evaluate
the identified seep locations listed in this document annually over the next five-year
permit cycle. These annual evaluations would be documented and would verify the
condition of the existing seeps and determine the presence of any newly developed
seeps. DWR will be promptly notified if new seeps are identified or any significant
changes are observed for the existing seeps. If any existing or newly identified seeps are
determined to reach Hyco Lake and the seepage has reasonable potential to exceed a
water quality standard, Duke Energy will take measures to either (1) stop the seepage,
(2) capture and route the seep so that it is discharged through a NPDES permitted
outfall, or (3) address the seep using Best Management Plans approved by DWR.
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES \NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Seep Report \ Roxboro Seep
Monitoring Report.docx

FIGURES

I: !.4 1
p, V C1� -
v
' `:=•tom::: �� . .-�7 Fjiv.
�Ji Jt � ~�f '• � ~�� \ � .I' 'l\�•. '�,ill J L: E.e - t� \ "_ —
� � c .. ': -F, rif •,t r '. ;r' ��� .,H� `� ' � -a L„Jr yr '��—n��
FXQ
�: •.
�1'''1 i �r�:-1i'�'���-fly���,''.�. �:� V� � .�, • ..1�-�'J:'�n�f � ��j � � •}_ _ ,iYYr, L--•'
ry
jam: _ __ • •�--� ��-✓�_-
i
500' COMPLIANCE'
BOUNDARY a l-gam
s
4 f:y L
'PROPERTY BOUNDARY
� 'ti �''�l' � .0 J�-5'-�:i� �fS ',_`�F�_j I, y � � s5�}r�l�� �• ,'��
Cam` i� ' f ��r - � _ s •-��'' S J �
f 1 C
` _��- n� ir�• - _ - _-�- �rJ-- f — �-5°"�� � __� 1,
-
` fir:; 7 r r'(�[�; � �..• I' ' n, . '� ��-,---. ' �' � ,-
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY AT ` r ! I`� ,:?c��., • �.�, r. • ` - "y
http.//datagatew y.nres.usda.gov/ ��~ 4.'- ( �W ti _ ' I•y^ '' f
ROXBORO POWER PLANT FIGURE 1
PERSON COUNTY
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
VIP DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
GREE"SB°RO0 ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
•RALEIGH
era GREENVILLE. 1700 DUNWAY RD
WnT
°""R`°E SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
•FAYETTEVILLE
OLIVE HILL, NC QUADRANGLE
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
WILMINGTGN
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: S.ARLEDGE DATE:zm4ao-os GRAPHIC SCALE
PHONE [phone] PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10ft 1000 0 1000 2000
www.synterracorp.com LAYOUT: FIG 1(SITE LOCATION) MAP DATE: 1994
IN FEET

roe
�1111 IF LEGEND
NPDES OUTFACE 006 - -
_ 0111 �1r1 TIC y�'� .0 ' O S-01 SEEP LOCATION
r _ _ it - _ = 1•A NPDES OUTFALL 001 NPDES OUTFALL LOCATION
{ - F - 1 _• _ - -16. OF _ R.L.M1 1 - is CW-3 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
r I
A 1
low
■
_ ' -� _ •'}. 9 Mw-i LANDFILL MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
dF
.I a i + r Ir r LI
0 _ _ -fir s + _ �.•�, % '' s•' ��• DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ROXBORO PLANT
dw
'• "� 500 ft COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
. _ �:•_ :R : • , . WASTE BOUNDARY
' _ _ �J
L oPo , • � _' •• •� � • � �• �' � • - � -• � � -r FLOW DIRECTION
416
1 RAILROAD — , •1 r ' ti ' 1
mrqr
.161
C` 1AN
1 1 y� 1• �r ti +
JL
r l . aim ~� • - �� IN •r
7 _
GUARDHOUSE ' V � • '••L0, ��. •' ' _ 1
CONTRACTORS GATE ' , -■•� } 1 ` ■' F
GYPSUM PAD 1.41 . . _ •_
wk
_ .�* _ _
POWER PLANT `' y_ L _ �— - T { _ LL
.IN,
1 % e.7
Area
L. SURFACE- _ }_, r —ems T 'r
•1 - ., - - WATER INTAKE I ' - - . 0 - Cw-1 '• , ,~4
.1� .
■ - � AN. _ - ` • L CMW-10 9 / e CMW-11 , ■� . � 16_ ,
CMW6 IL
I.1___________________\ ♦ + �F _
a ■^
�•- 1 _� LJ
1 �
*� i r._ 1966 \ i i . r. r I 1 .1
L / SEMI -ACTIVE
• w ASH BASIN % ,' , r
, � l f1 ,1
OI 5-10ti . ' a ti•k 1 L
,`� LINED LANDFILL i �' }• -• •l .' . ' T . J` ,
CW-5 i k ,• 7}z , ti
O S-09 { �-
*�•.� ,L F _ 7 CHIMNEY DRAINS r +�. ; � 1 �� 1 _ 1 AL
* *. 16
. �Y�� ' FI• } O 1'J,y.� + _■ 1� qm-- / ` i • ):; f , •' - ,•. • ' ''1.1 � + 1 �� �■ 4 •• �+ L L
-wr
et
-08
_ Q '(� o IN,O� 1
-- ------- f-------------- --- -- ------- I •; ``•' fir' _�_ 1 'i _ J ti- }_� �Ow
_
FI'1 QO� + I �F - I I ,� _r ' 1 ii L I' •' Irl I+ Sidr - CMW-7
S07 cra i ■.
_ •F _ Ah-i _ - r - _ i• y �' • - • - +' \ - \ •� T - _' 1 7_ .. • ` — _ - - •'� i
-1• ti .ry
lip e .1
IN
' T - ' 1 J I 1 i Ir
. - may J-' j - ' - 1 •�• _ � CMbV-8 a 1` �� I, _i`J - 1
,•r ` CMW-9 8 ' 91
1 V tir J• _� � T 1
�_ ■i ' - •■' I Jam' L • ■ , , �■ �� i F 'd ' �' ` 1 y� 1 ... 16-
ti , _ , _ •_,: 1
ell. 1 • r' 1 • '1�'• 55 1.• r �- . _1 1 r 1• •' +L .r
_
1: h116
IF 4 ?P
`;- -r
' _ _ 1 .■ T '1 1 I _ � r� 1 r . , ; I r ' I • 1 ' r • ' '�� 111'����til' i • r - ' 1 r
1 r •� ■ r I J •• ' ti , ' �r, .. r _ L r,f "� _ L 1 ,rf 1 L �'■ � �
• -1 1 . 1 y iLiL, .� - '�.r ' z - ' ~ 1 A 1 _r } ti Y L ,# 1;_ �'_
f ' ''sir. •� +I 1 k 1 • 1 .1- - ~ r L +
i' 'r_� 11 ' J. r-
•rL } + ,1,{{1 y'1� _ _ .1 �T+ _ ..r - 7' �• ' ` 3 rl iti L L� ••�-
L i aii+ L Lt' ''Mi r r �r - -r ti ■,r r - - '. 1' r•~ . ' r' r
• ' I� }• .� :' - +• '■' I r.�_Ir1 L ■•±1•Y �L . Fib JI• �L . _ - _ - tr SOURCES:
' .' ■ I - _ ■ r _ -T ti •1 I t rJ _ - ti • �'• it • ■ �' •� �• 1 ' _ 1 ' I r
DUNNAWgyRp ' +. s. ' j L: i - _ 1. 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WAS OBTAINED
�} {•' 1' r� •� _ ._ s _ r,� ■ 'ti•- C� ,• ti .$,�ti .. r # _ } • 1 FROM THE USGS EARTH EXPLORER WEB SITE AT http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
* - x' 1*' ' ,1' - r L— 1973 ACTIVE - -
�• 1 _ i 2. WELL SURVEY INFORMATION, PROPERTY LINE, LANDFILL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES ARE
■��' - ■ 1'r • • 1 ASH BASIN _ , 1 __ _ r r • 1
3 1, • I 1 ■ s ■r J' ti r FROM ARCGIS FILES PROVIDED BY S&ME AND PROGRESS ENERGY.
J� �� it 1 * i - r Al 1 r - - r f _ 1 F _ ■ _ �•':.
' 1 , ' _ T f r �' IL 3. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
. - N -
r . `' `yL - ■ _ 7 1 N.
' : a , ' 1 1 ■ , 4. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE
iy ■• 1, } '
I FI Qa _ L 1 PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM PS 3200 (NAD 83).
% •� 1 �� DUNNAWAY - -.'' • •• •,, 1 _ !
INC
Iir I- GRAPHIC SCALE
• J �• t 500 0 250 500 1000
.I + + ■ _1 ' - ' i ~ ' , ' a r _ ; '1 L ; (IN FEET)
`1116ti. Jy }
ti �' , 17 . • r 0% % `` }r ' y i 1 1 7, y •�1' yti L _ , z _ ~ _ ' • a- �^t•
' ■ I 1 , .. , •I, + L I `T : _ 1 r '• FI i r114, r ' 'ti a'•
IN
No
_
T •' i `•
IF
AA
' ti
INCI.
- �;r•• . ' ~ 1 ' ,tir �, '� I •%�, , L _� , • M.
• * 1 ' i� _ - •i ' • ' •• • 4L ' r yr _ • ••ti L'� ' •_ I' r
%
1
T■IR _� 1 � .1 1 f r
~f 1, �., +. 1 CW-3D F i� _ ,1 I r -•• ti ti 1 it r L r F
r 1 raj■ ■ + • .� r■-• '+ I •, • ' •i ■ .1 '
Al,
III
%
■�ti T T 1 � •L L ti - , ■
f {+ r r _erra
IL
1 •I III LA. ' t 'r 'r r'•' - . L . . �; ~-' +,,., >r;; 4� .:^; 148 River Street, Suite 220
.� -� iI Greenville, South Carolina 29601
•} 1 CANAL Ir , _ .►�' ' !'• _ 864-421-9999
I , f
1 -C �'
_ L 1� _ L ,
�} i ti. z + s: i' . ,'� 1 _ _ ,� , ti •� ��.• J. •Iz, �% I + _ ,1 ,� • i ti .. ;-=� .�, � �'�_ , . ''� � www.synterracorp.com
1 ;° ti DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 2014-10-09
■ ,1 — ,• _ h ;' _ i'■ T •• -_ ,�,•• �'"�Q�;;'�, - CHECKED BY: J. WYLIE DATE: 2014-10-09
- • 1 }:J _ 1� _ _ _ 1 _ w° ; ' PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB
kJ_
L +
_ - + LAYOUT NAME: FIG 2(SEEP SAMPLE LOCATION)
No* ILL
ra ti 1 T ' F 11 Iti 1, `F .{ •r, i' �r
IJ'- k %; •ti�F rT • •r' _ +: • 11 - 1 ' 1� z , •�� r •f �r ».
- 4 i' y�G'ylyq 1 it 1 rW 1' , +• i ' r" 1 - - ■ _ •+_ 1 - ' .
WOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ys>7 �•' i ■ • _• .+ •- r•:` • { '•'-.`' '`00 JA-
r }F+
1• L7 1*1 , 3 {. +• ]. , 1' y �i 1. • 1 • 1 1 ' I� r' F -F TG i ' ' - • J`'`_ '�'�+'tit;'+•ii ' .r'r, _•-^�M,
.. + 7W •liL �} 1 _ +l. .. "l1. + t.�,.:..., EDNUEKREG
Y
•I ••-TT 1•yl, •I _ •� 'ir+ , •� I.1■1 •..FI '_ , • - I �• ` �• .1 } F` {'r■s .r•''.-.-w`'
1 , i h�?�
,fir �� till
r
L 1
IN,
K , ,`I
f;..
4 , f L tiw, L11 Vs .
do )Il-
.16 jr
IN
IN
j6
1
A,
1
IN
T
hL r IN .
1
;� ' i s ,}, PROGRESS
L F •; - L-err ti ' f. T 1 '� 1 .. '1 1 .S 'Y i}, ,
+ 1 ' r •I 'M.�,�- 'f� �a �'; � _' �+ Lfl _ �'� r }` � ' � ' - � �• r �, ,� ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
_ r_ 1 �• 1700 DUNNAWAY RD
L111116b�'�• ��_Ir - _,. ; ' SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
1116
' �1C J� Ir 1 1 =• I _ +� _ I , ti _I f l`P. ttil'.•A ,� .7� .
' , ~ r + �_ , ti.:- .`. �I' .. �r ` - %• : �r _,t=-•�*.. FIGURE 2
' ' _ 1 � , 1 F . • � _ . . _ L •• '�•_ ti• .•r• J a1• -+ r .r—• _ ':.i � � •, � ,-. i ...
j r ' - -��- f '' IDENTIFIED SEEPS AND WATER QUALITY
T . L 1 4 r_ I ,err i +• ,•L'� ' I �a�� yy■ 1• f L ti r• 1. 1 �i1 r ' ,•,L,I�i _ _r'- - _ i '1;� a-.
_''~ 1 ~1—+ I �h --'' L% F• '• ' , tom: SAMPLE LOCATIONS
1 L ' N. 1 'f. `4 `!
I b- , , _ , 1 '•�. •%?1 _ •�. {���,1�{ ■ 1 aril _'• I_ r�

TABLES

TABLE 1
SEEP LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
SEEP ID
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
FLOW
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #1; flow in March 2014, no flow in August 2014; when flowing, flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted
5-01
36.477043
-79.076467
Intermittent
outfall 003.
5-02
36.477055
-79.076727
Continuous
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #2; flow in March and August 2014; flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted outfall 003.
5-03
36.476994
-79.076978
Continuous
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #3; flow in March and August 2014; flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted outfall 003.
5-04
36.476923
-79.077204
Continuous
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #4; flow in March and August 2014; flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted outfall 003.
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #5; flow in March 2014, no flow in August 2014; when flowing, flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted
5-05
36.476751
-79.077412
Intermittent
outfall 003.
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #6; flow in March 2014, no flow in August 2014; when flowing, flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted
5-06
36.47669
-79.077643
Intermittent
outfall 003.
5-07
36.476736
-79.077954
Continuous
West Ash Basin Dam chimney drain #7; flow in March and August 2014; flows to heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted outfall 003.
Seepage area approximately 30 feet west of chimney drain #7 and 15 feet south of wastewater mixing area; flow in March and August 2014; flows overland to
5-08
36.476719
-79.078064
Continuous
heated wastewater mixing area, then to permitted outfall 003.
5-09
36.478230
-79.056076
Continuous
Ponded area east of East Ash Basin/Landfill berm; receives flow from intermittent seeps upslope and flow from the east. Flows towards the intake canal (S-13).
Seepage area along northern portion (midslope) of East Ash Basin/Landfill berm; when flowing, flows to ponded area (S-09) and then towards the intake canal
5-10
36.479169
-79.056963
Intermittent
(S-13).
Seepage area along central portion (midslope) of East Ash Bsin/Landfill berm; when flowing, flows to ponded area (S-09) and then towards the intake canal (S-
S-11
36.478569
-79.056737
Intermittent
13).
Seepage area along southern portion (midslope) of East Ash Basin/Landfill berm; when flowing, flows to ponded area (S-09) and then towards the intake canal
S-12
36.478103
-79.056735
Intermittent
(S-13).
Flow from ponded area east of East Ash Basin/Landfill berm (S-09), flows north, through pipes under RR tracks, and into intake canal. Water in the intake canal
5-13
36.486175
-79.059612
Continuous
is taken into the plant and used for various purposes before being released through permitted outfall 003.
5-14
36.483738
-79.063751
Continuous
Flow from pipe originating beneath Gypsum Pad area; flows to permitted outfall 003.
Prepared by: JAW Checked by: KWW
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables\Roxboro\Seep Report\Tables\Table 1 - Seep Locations and Descriptions Page 1 of 1

Table 2
Seep Flows and Analytical Results, August 25-26, 2014
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Map ID
S-02
S-03
S-04
S-07
S-08
S-09
S-13
S-13
Duplicate
S-14
Flow
MGD
0.00044
0.00094
0.00051
0.00063
0.00107
NF
0.01782
0.01782
0.00808
Flow Measurement Method
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
--
TV
TV
AV
Oil & Grease
mg/L
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
<
5.0
< 5.0
COD
mg/L
<
20
<
20
<
20
<
20
27
<
20
<
20
<
20
< 20
Chloride
mg/L
130
260
460
1400
2100
5.8
13
13
19
Fluoride
mg/L
0.45
0.74
0.64
<
1
0.76
0.18
<
0.5
0.5
1.0
Sulfate
mg/L
660
410
480
650
730
66
190
190
710
Mercury (Hg)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
< 1
Aluminum (Al)
mg/L
<
0.005
0.020
0.027
0.009
0.122
0.101
0.044
0.052
1.49
Barium (Ba)
mg/L
0.146
0.262
0.297
0.249
0.243
0.044
0.061
0.062
0.070
Boron (B)
mg/L
4.49
6.96
9.44
16.3
29.3
1.38
1.48
1.49
1.78
Calcium (Ca)
mg/L
268
275
338
718
1190
21.6
61.9
62.1
248
Hardness
mg/L (CaCO3)
1050
1050
1320
2680
4260
88.6
265
266
799
Iron (Fe)
mg/L
1.29
9.27
12.7
4.70
52.7
0.122
2.41
2.50
13.7
Magnesium (Mg)
mg/L
91.5
88.3
115
216
311
8.43
26.9
26.9
43.5
Manganese (Mn)
mg/L
4.17
3.67
5.69
11.5
13.9
0.114
1.53
1.56
3.11
Zinc (Zn)
mg/L
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
<
0.005
0.005
Antimony (Sb)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.74
Arsenic (As)
ug/L
<
1
1.47
1.88
<
1
2.86
15.7
1.73
1.65
25.4
Cadmium (Cd)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
< 1
Chromium (Cr)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
2.57
Copper (Cu)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.34
1.11
4.42
Lead (Pb)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
2.09
Molybdenum (Mo)
ug/L
13.1
32.2
36.4
25.4
39.1
110
38.1
38.1
106
Nickel (Ni)
ug/L
1.39
1.88
1.64
3.21
4.98
<
1
<
1
<
1
3.64
Selenium (Se)
ug/L
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
<
1
1.86
<
1
<
1
62.9
Thallium (TI) Low Level
ug/L
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
<
0.2
< 0.2
TDS
mg/L
1400
1300
2100
4600
7200
170
430
430
1200
TSS
mg/L
<
5.0
22
27
9.0
36
9.0
<
5
5.0
97
pH
S.U.
6.8
7.6
7.7
7.6
6.7
6.8
7.0
7.0
7.1
Temperature
°C
29
29
29
28
21
26
18
18
23
Specific conductance
us/cm
1786
1854
2437
4612
6240
274
652
652
1446
Turbidity
NTU
11.8
17.1
6.8
25.5
34.8
2.63
NM
NM
6.17
NF - Flow not present during this sampling event or too low to be measured.
NM - Not measured
TV - Timed Volume
AV - Area Velocity
MGD - Million Gallons Per Day
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Del iverables\Roxboro\Seep Report\Tables\Table 2 - Seeps Analytical Results Page 1 of 1

Table 3
Seep Analytical Methods
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. - Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Semora, North Carolina
Parameter
Method
Reporting Limit
Units
Lab
COD
HACH 8000
20
mg/L
Duke Energy
Aluminum (Al)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Antimony (Sb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Arsenic (As)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Barium (Ba)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Boron (B)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg/L
Duke Energy
Cadmium (Cd)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Calcium (Ca)
EPA 200.7
0.1
mg/L
Duke Energy
Chloride
EPA 300.0
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
Chromium (Cr)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Copper (Cu)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Fluoride
EPA 300.0
1
mg/L
Duke Energy
Hardness
EPA 200.7
0.19
mg/L (CaCO3)
Duke Energy
Iron (Fe)
EPA 200.7
0.01
mg/L
Duke Energy
Lead (Pb)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Magnesium (Mg)
EPA 200.7
0.05
mg/L
Duke Energy
Manganese (Mn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Mercury (Hg)
EPA 245.1
0.05
ug/L
Duke Energy
Molybdenum (Mo)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Nickel (Ni)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Oil and Grease
EPA 1664B
5.0
mg/L
Pace Analytical
Selenium (Se)
EPA 200.8
1
ug/L
Duke Energy
Sulfate
EPA 300.0
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
TDS
SM2540C
25
mg/L
Duke Energy
Thallium (TI) Low Level
EPA 200.8
0.2
ug/L
Duke Energy
TSS
SM2540D
5
mg/L
Duke Energy
Zinc (Zn)
EPA 200.7
0.005
mg/L
Duke Energy
Prepared By: RBI Checked By: KWW
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Del ivera bles\Roxboro\See p Report\Tables\Table 3 Analytical Methods Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A
ANALYTICAL SAMPLE HANDLING,
PRESERVATION, AND HOLDING TIME
REQUIREMENTS

Parameter name
Table 16—Inorganic Tests-
1. Acidity
2. Alkalinity
4, Ammonia
9. Biochemical oxygen demand
10. Boron
11. Bromide
14. Biochemical oxygen demand, carbonaceous
15, Chemical oxygen demand
16. Chloride
17. Chlorine. total residual
21. Color
23-24. Cyanide, total or available (or CATC) and Free
25. Fluoride
27. Hardness
26. Hydrogen ion (pHy
31, 43. Kjeldahl and organic N
Table I$ —Metals''
18. Chromium Vl
35. Mercury (CVAA)
35. Mercury (CVAFS)
3, 5-8, 12, 13, 19. 20, 22, 26, 29, 30, 32-34, 36, 37, 45,
47, 51, 52, 58-60, 62, 63, 70-72, 74, 75. Metals, except
boron, chromium VI, and mercury
38, Nitrate
39. Nitrate -nitrite
40. Nitrite
41, Oil and grease
42. Organic Carbon
44. Orthophosphate
46. Oxygen, Dissolved Probe
47. Winkler
48. Phenols
49. Phosphorous (elemental)
50. Phosphorous, total
53. Residue, total
54. Residue, Filterable
55. Residue, Non€alterable (TSS)
56. Residue, Settleable
57. Residue, Volatile
61. Silica
64. Specific conductance
65. Sulfate
66. Sulfide
67, Sulfite
fib. Surfactants
69. Temperature
73. Turbidity
Containerl I Preservation2 3
P, FP, G
Cool, s6 'C'$
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 'C"
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 'C"', H2SO,, to pH t2
P, FP, G
Coal, C6 °C1e
P, FP. or Quartz
HNC-, to pH <2
P, FP. G
Bone required
P, FP G
Cool, s6 'C'6
P, FP, G
Cool, s6'C1° H2SO4 to pH <
P, FP, G
None required
P, G
None required
P. FP, G
Cool, 56'C'"
P, FP, G
Cool, s6'C1", NaOH to pH >105
r, reducing agent if oxidizer
present
P
None required
P, FP, G
HNO, or H�SOA to pH ¢2
P. FP, G
None required
P, FP. G
Cool, s6 'C"', HzSC., to pH <2
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 'C"', pH = 9.3-9.7�"
P, FP, G
HNO, to pH <2
FP, G: and FP-
5 mUL 12N HCI or 5 mUL BrCI"
lined cap"
P, FP, G
HNO3 to pH <2, or at least 24
hours prior to analysist9
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 'C"
P. FP, G
Cool. s6'C"`. H2SO4 to pH <2
P. FP, G
Cool, s6'C111
G
Cool to 56 'C1°, HCI or H2SO4 to
PH C2
P, FP, 0
Cool to s6 'Cie, HCI, H2SO4, ur
H3P0a to PH t2
P, FP, G
Cool, to s6 'C", "
G, Bottle and top I None required
G, Bottle and top
Fix on site and store in dark
G
Cool, 56 T"', HISO, to pH C2
G
Cool, 56 T"1
P, FP, G
Coal, 56 'C', H2SO4 to pH t2
P. FP. G
Cool. -6 "C"'
P. FP, G
Cool, 56 T"'
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 `C1'
P, FP, G
Cool, %6 °C7°
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 'C"'
P or Quartz
Cool, 56 °CY8
P. FP, G
Cool. 56 'C1'
P, FP, G
Cool. c6'C1&
P, FP, G
Cool. 56 `C'8, add zinc acetate
plus sodium hydroxide to pH >9
P, FP, G
None required
P, FP, G
Cool, 56 `C"
P, FP, G
None required:
P. FP, G
Cool, 156 "C"
14 days.
14 days.
28 days.
48 hours.
6 months,
2.8 days_
48 hours.
28 days.
28 days.
Analyze within 15
minutes.
48 hours.
14 days.
28 days.
6 months.
Analyze within 15
minutes.
28 days.
28 days.
28 days.
90 days_"
6 months
48 hours.
28 days.
48 hours.
28 days.
28 days.
Filter within 15 minutes;
Analyze within 48
hours.
Analyze within 15
minutes. _
8 hours.
28 days. j==jIlli
48 hours.
28 days.
7 days.
7 days.
7 days.
48 hours.
7 days.
28 days.
28 days.
28 days
7 days
Analyze within 15
minutes_
48 hours.
Analyze.
48 hours_
'"P" is for polyethylene; "FP" is fluoropolymer (polytetrafluaroethyiene (PTFE); Teflom ), or other fluoropolymer, unless stated otherwise
in this Table II; "G" is glass; "PA" is any plastic that is made of a stedIizable material {polypropylene or other autoclavable plastic}; "LDPE' is
low density ,polyethylene.
2Except where noted in this Table II and the method for the parameter, preserve each grab sample within 15 minutes of collection. For a
composite sample collected with an automated sample (e.g., using a 24-hour composite sample; see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part
403, Appendix E), refrigerate the sample at 56 'C during collection unless specified otherwise in this Table II or in the method(s). For a
composite sample to be split into separate aliquots for preservation and/or analysis, maintain the sample at 56 'C, unless specified otherwise
in this Table II or in the method(&), until collection, splitting, and preservation is completed. Add the preservative to the sample container prior
to sample collection when the preservative will not compromise the integrity of a grab sample, a composite sample, or aliquot split from a

composite sample within 15 minutes of collection. if a composite measurement is required but a composite sample would compromise sample
integrity, individual grab samples must be collected at prescribed time intervals (e.g., 4 samples over the course of a day, at 6-hour intervals).
Grab samples must be analyzed separately and the concentrations averaged. Alternatively, grab samples may be collected in the field and
composited in the laboratory if the compositing procedure produces results equivalent to results produced by arithmetic averaging of results of
analysis of Individual grab samples. For examples of laboratory compositing procedures, see EPA Method 1664 Rev. A (oil and grease) and
the procedures at 40 CFR 141,34(0(14)(iv) and (v) (volatile organics).
'When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent via the U.S. Postal Service, it must comply with the Department of
Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part 172). The person offering such material for transportation is responsible for
ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirement of Table II, the Office of Hazardous Materials, Materials Transportation Bureau,
Department of Transportation has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply to the following materials: Hydrochloric
acid (HCl) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1.96 or greater; Nitric acid (HNO�) in water solutions at
concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less (pH about 1,62 or greater); Sulfuric acid (HzSOA) in water solutions at concentrations of 0,35% by
weight or less (pH about 1.15 or greater); and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.080% by weight or less (pH
about 12,30 or less),
"Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum times that samples may be held
before the start of analysis and still be considered valid. Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee or monitoring laboratory
has data on file to show that, for the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time, and has received a
variance from the Regional Administrator under Sec. 136.3(e). For a grab sample, the holding time begins at the time of collection. For a
composite sample collected with an automated sampler (e.g., using a 24-hour composite sampler; see 40 CFR 12221(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR part
403, Appendix Ej, the holding time begins at the time of the end of collection of the composite sample. For a set of grab samples composited
in the field or laboratory, the holding time begins at the time of collection of the last grab sample in the set. Some samples may not be stable
for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee or monitoring laboratory is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if it
knows that a shorter time is necessary to maintain sample stability. See 136.3(e) for details. The date and time of collection of an individual
grab sample is the date and time at which the sample is collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and that are all collected on
the same calendar date, the date of collection is the date on which the samples are collected. For a set of grab samples to be composited, and
that are collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e.g., November 14-15. For a composite
sample collected automatically on a given date, the date of collection is the date on which the sample is collected. For a composite sample
collected automatically, and that is collected across two calendar dates, the date of collection is the dates of the two days; e_g., November 14-
15. For static -renewal toxicity tests, each grab or composite sample may also be used to prepare test solutions for renewal at 24 h, 48 h,
and/or 72 h after first use, if stored at 0-6 "C, with minimum head space,
5ASTM D7365-099 specifies treatment options for samples containing oxidants (e.g., chlorine). Also, Section 9060A of Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th and 21st editions) addresses dechlorination procedures.
°Sampling, preservation and mitigating interferences in water samples for analysis of cyanide are described in ASTM 137365-09a. There
may be interferences that are not mitigated by the analytical test methods or D7365-09a. Any technique for removal or suppression of
interference may be employed, provided the laboratory demonstrates that it more accurately measures cyanide through quality control
measures described in the analytical test method. Any removal or suppression technique not described in D7365-09a or the analytical test
method must be documented along with supporting data-
7 For dissolved metals, filter grab samples within 15 minutes of collection and before adding preservatives. For a composite sample
collected with an automated sampler (e.g„ using a 24-hour composite sampler, see 40 CFR 122.21(g)(7)(i) or 40 CFR Part 403, Appendix Ej,
filter the sample within 15 minutes after completion of collection and before adding preservatives. If it is known or suspected that dissolved
sample integrity will be compromised during collection at a composite sample collected automatically over time (e_g., by interchange of a metal
between dissolved and suspended forms), collect and filter grab samples to be composited (footnote 2) in place of a composite sample
collected automatically_
°Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC. LC, or GCIMS for specific compounds.
"If the sample is not adjusted to pH 2, then the sample must be analyzed within seven days of sampling.
`vThe pH adjustment is not required If acrolein will not be measured. Samples for acrolein receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed
within 3 days of sampling_
'When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified preservative and maximum holding
times should be observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity (I.e., use all necessary preservatives and hold for the shortest time listed).
When the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories, the sample may be preserved by cooling to s6 °C, reducing residual
chlorine with 0.008% sodium thiosulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the pH to 6-9; samples preserved in this manner may be held for
seven days before extraction and for forty days after extraction_ Exceptions to this optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted
in Footnote 5 (regarding the requirement for thiosulfate reduction), and footnotes 12, 13 (regarding the analysis of benzidine).
�If 1,2-diphenylhydrazine is likely to be present, adjust the pH of the sample to 4.0 ±0.2 to prevent rearrangement to henzidine.
"Extracts may be stored up to 30 days at <0 'C.
'"For the analysts of di phenyl nitrosamine, add 0.008% Na2$0, and adjust pH to 7-10 with NaOH within 24 hours of sampling.
'sThe pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are extracted within 72 hours
of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% Na2S2O3.
'"Place sufficient ice with the samples in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still present when the samples arrive at the
laboratory. However, even if ice is present when the samples arrive, immediately measure the temperature of the samples and confirm that
the preservation temperature maximum has not been exceeded. In the isolated cases where it can be documented that this holding
temperature cannot be met, the permittee can be given the option of on -site testing or can request a variance. The request for a variance
should include supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent samples is not reduced because of the increased holding
temperature. Aqueous samples must not be frozen. Hand -delivered samples used on the day of collection do not need to be cooled to 0 to 6
°C prior to test initiation.
"Samples collected for the determination of trace level mercury (000 ngIL) using EPA Method 1631 must be collected in tightly -
capped fluoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCt or HCI solution within 48 hours of sample collection. The time to preservation
may be extended to 28 days if a sample is oxidized in the sample battle. A sample collected for dissolved trace level mercury should be
filtered in the laboratory within 24 hours of the time of collection. However, if circumstances preclude overnight shipment, the sample should
be filtered in a designated clean area in the field in accordance with procedures given in Method 1669. If sample integrity will not be
maintained by shipment to and filtration in the laboratory, the sample must be filtered in a designated clean area in the field within the time

period necessary to maintain sample integrity. A sample that has been collected for determination of total or dissolved trace level mercury
must be analyzed within 90 days of sample collection.
iBAqueous samples must be preserved at 56 °C, and should not be frozen unless data demonstrating that sample freezing does not
adversely impact sample Integrity Is maintained on file and accepted as valid by the regulatory authority. Also, for purposes of NPIDES
monitoring, the specification of "s°C" is used in place of the °4 °C° and "<4 °C" sample temperature requirements listed in some methods. It is
not necessary to measure the sample temperature to three significant figures (1l100th of 1 degree); rather, three significant figures are
specified so that rounding down to 6 'C may not be used to meet the 56 'C requirement. The preservation temperature does not apply to
samples that are analyzed immediately (less than 15 minutes).
19An aqueous sample may be collected and shipped without acid preservation. However, acid must be added at least 24 hours before
analysis to dissolve any metals that adsorb to the container walls. If the sample must be analyzed within 24 hours of collection, add the acid
immediately (see footnote 2). Soil and sediment samples do not need to be preserved with acid. The allowances in this footnote supersede the
preservation and holding time requirements in the approved metals methods,
2°To achieve the 28-day holding time, use the ammonium sulfate buffer solution specified in EPA Method 218.6. The allowance in this
footnote supersedes preservation and holding time requirements in the approved hexavalent chromium methods, unless this supersession
would compromise the measurement, in which case requirements In the method must be followed.
Holding time is calculated from time of sample collection to elution for samples shipped to the laboratory in bulk and calculated from
the time of sample filtration to elution for samples filtered in the field.
r-Sample analysis should begin as soon as possible after receipt; sample incubation must be started no later than 8 hours from time of
collection,
'3For fecal col fform samples for sewage sludge (btosolids) only, the holding time is extended to 24 hours for the following sample types
using either EPA Method 1680 (LTB-EC) or 1681 (A-1): Class A composted, Class B aerobically digested, and Class B anaerobically digested.
24The immediate filtration requirement in orthophosphate measurement is to assess the dissolved or bin -available form of
orthophosphorus (i.e., that which passes through a 0.45-micron filter), hence the requirement to Filter the sample immediately upon collection
(i.e., within 15 minutes of collection).
[38 FIR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973

tip
syn,T(erra
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
SAMPLING, ANALYSIS, AND REPORTING PLAN
FOR
ROXBORO STEAM PLANT
1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD
SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003425
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
DUKE
�... ENERGY.
rRo�-=REss
SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014
+�4 Ho i s er, r,,,s
CAR
uu i+
� V
a
SEAL
1425
D0:0
r to NC PG i �~ ��•``
G eolog,4 'N'Pell.lq+wi"%
S E ZL,
1 `alb PG 1328
�rict Manager
W. _.•.

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0
Introduction..................................................................................................................................1
2.0
Site Description............................................................................................................................2
2.1
Plant and Ash Management Areas......................................................................................
2
2.2
Ash Management Area Description....................................................................................2
3.0
Site Geology and Hydrogeology...............................................................................................3
3.1
Geologic Framework..............................................................................................................
3
3.2
Hydrogeologic Framework...................................................................................................4
4.0
Monitoring Program....................................................................................................................6
4.1
Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring .................................................
6
4.2
Description of Groundwater Monitoring System..............................................................7
4.3
Monitoring Frequency...........................................................................................................
8
4.4
Sample Parameters and Methods.........................................................................................
8
4.5
Data Quality Objectives.........................................................................................................9
5.0
Sampling Procedures.................................................................................................................10
5.1
Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures..............................................................10
5.2
Groundwater Sampling.......................................................................................................10
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells..............................................................................10
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements...............................................10
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling.........................................................................................11
5.3
Sample Collection.................................................................................................................12
5.4
Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time.....................................12
5.5
Sample Tracking...................................................................................................................12
5.6
Sample Labeling...................................................................................................................12
5.7
Field Documentation............................................................................................................13
5.8
Chain -of -Custody Record....................................................................................................14
5.9
Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt.....................................................14
6.0
Analytical Procedures...............................................................................................................16
7.0
Internal Quality Control Checks.............................................................................................17
8.0
Validation of Field Data Package...........................................................................................19
9.0
Validation of Laboratory Data.................................................................................................20
10.0
Report Submittal........................................................................................................................21
11.0
References...................................................................................................................................22
Page i
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
List of Figures
Figure 1- Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Sample Location Map
Figure 3 - Typical Monitoring Well Construction Details
Figure 4 - Example Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
Figure 5 - Example Field Sampling Calibration Form
Figure 6 - Chain -of -Custody Record and Analysis Request Form
Figure 7 - North Carolina Groundwater Sampling Checklist
List of Tables
Table 1- Monitoring Well Information
Table 2 - Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and
Holding Times
List of Appendices
Appendix A - Boring Logs and Well Construction Records
Appendix B - Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, Version 1.0, dated
March 17, 2011
Page ii
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Groundwater Monitoring Program Sampling, Analysis, and Reporting Plan (Plan)
is developed to support the Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy) requirement for
groundwater monitoring around the Roxboro Steam Plant (Roxboro Plant) ash
management area operated under NPDES Permit NC0003425.
This Plan describes the groundwater monitoring network, methodologies of field
sampling, record -keeping protocols, analytical procedures, data quality objectives, data
validation, and reporting that will be used for the Roxboro Plant ash basins
groundwater monitoring program.
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Plant and Ash Management Areas
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. owns and operates the Roxboro Steam Plant (Roxboro
Plant) located in north -central North Carolina near Semora, North Carolina. A large
part of the Plant area encompasses Hyco Lake. The Roxboro Plant is located in Person
County along the east bank of Hyco Lake north of Roxboro, NC and west of McGhees
Mill Road. The site location is shown on Figure 1.
The Roxboro Plant began operations in 1966, and additional units were added in 1968,
1973, and 1980. Throughout its operational history, the Roxboro Plant has employed
coal-fired units to produce steam. Coal combustion residuals (CCR) have been
managed in on -site ash basins.
2.2 Ash Management Area Description
Ash generated from coal combustion throughout the operational history of the Roxboro
Plant was stored in on -site ash basins and a CCR landfill. Throughout most of its
history, ash was sluiced as a slurry to the ash basins or conveyed in its dry form to the
CCR landfill. Two ash basins have historically been used at the Roxboro Plant and are
referenced using the date of construction and relative location: the 1966 ash basin (East
Ash Basin) and the 1973 active ash basin (West Ash Basin). The 1966 semi -active ash
basin is located southeast of the plant, and the 1973 active ash basin is located south of
the plant. The CCR landfill was constructed as an unlined landfill on top of the former
East Ash Basin in 1988. A lined landfill was subsequently constructed over the unlined
landfill in 2004.
The ash basins are impounded by earthen dams. Surface water runoff from the East
Ash Basin and the CCR landfill are routed into the West Ash Basin to allow settling. A
500-foot compliance boundary encircles the ash basin areas. The ash basin locations are
indicated on Figure 2.
Currently, the East Ash Basin and CCR landfill are covered with vegetation where the
landfill is not active (grasses and shrubs). The active ash basin has some grass cover
and ponded water, mostly along the southern and eastern edges of the basin.
Wastewater discharges from the facility are permitted by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit NC0003425.
Page 2
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
3.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.1 Geologic Framework
The Roxboro Plant is situated in the eastern Piedmont Region of north -central North
Carolina. The Piedmont is characterized by well-rounded hills and rolling ridges cut by
small streams and drainages. Elevations in the area of the Roxboro Plant range between
410 feet above mean sea level (msl) during full pool at Hyco Lake to 570 feet msl near
the Dunnaway Road and McGhees Mill Road intersection southeast of the Plant.
Geologically, the Plant is located at the contact of two regional geologic zones: the Inner
Piedmont zone and the Carolina zone. Both zones are generally comprised of igneous
and metamorphosed igneous and sedimentary rocks of Paleozoic age. In general, the
rocks are highly fractured and folded and have been subjected to long periods of
physical and chemical weathering. The origination, genesis, and characteristics of the
rocks of the region have been the focus of detailed study by researchers for many years.
These investigations have resulted in a number of interpretations and periodic
refinements to the overall geological model of the region.
Rocks of the region, except where exposed in road cuts, stream channels, and steep
hillsides, are covered with unconsolidated material formed from the in -situ chemical
and physical breakdown of the bedrock. This unconsolidated material is referred to as
saprolite or residuum. Direct observations at the Roxboro Plant confirm the presence of
residuum, developed above the bedrock, which is generally 10 to 30 feet thick. The
residuum extends from the ground surface (soil zones) downward, transitioning
through a zone comprised of unconsolidated silt and sand, downward through a
transition zone of partially weathered rock in a silt/sand matrix, down to the contact
with competent bedrock.
The Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985) places the rocks of the Plant area in the
Charlotte Terrane: a belt of metamorphic rock trending generally southwest to
northeast characterized by strongly foliated felsic mica gneiss and schist and
metamorphosed intrusive rocks. The rocks of the area near the Plant are described as
biotite gneiss and schist with abundant potassic feldspar and garnet, and interlayered
and gradational with calc-silicate rock, silliminite-mica schist and amphibolite. The
gneiss contains small masses of granite rock. The felsic mica gneiss of the Charlotte
Terrane is described as being interlayered with biotite and hornblende schist. Later
mapping generally confirms these observations and places the Roxboro Plant directly at
the contact between the Inner Piedmont zone, characterized by the presence of biotite
Page 3
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
gneiss and schist, and the Charlotte Belt (or Charlotte Terrane), characterized by felsic
mica gneiss (USGS, 2007).
Other researchers have conducted detailed investigations of the area and have provided
additional description of the geology in detailed tectonic, structural, and litho-
stratigraphic terms (Wilkins, Shell and Hibbard, 1995; Hibbard, et. al., 2002). One of the
most important interpretations concerning the geologic nature of the region is the
discovery and description of the Hyco shear zone, a tectonic boundary comprised of a
ductile shear zone that sharply separates contrasting rocks of the Charlotte (Milton) and
Carolina Terranes in north -central North Carolina and southern Virginia (Hibbard, et.
al., 1998). The Hyco shear zone was mapped as directly underlying Hyco Lake.
These general geologic observations are consistent with site -specific observations from
well logs for the Roxboro Plant, which document the bedrock of the northwestern
portion of the compliance boundary as mafic granitic gneiss and the remainder of the
site as felsic gneiss and hornblende gneiss. Based on previous activities at the site,
subsurface lithology beneath the Plant area is comprised of tan to olive brown sandy silt
and fine to coarse sands grading into partially weathered rock and then competent
bedrock.
3.2 Hydrogeologic Framework
Groundwater within the area exists under unconfined, or water table, conditions within
the residuum and/or saprolite zone and in fractures and joints of the underlying
bedrock. The water table and bedrock aquifers are interconnected. The residuum acts
as a reservoir for supplying groundwater to the fractures and joints in the bedrock.
Shallow groundwater generally flows from local recharge zones in topographically high
areas, such as ridges, toward groundwater discharge zones, such as stream valleys.
Ridge and topographic high areas serve as groundwater recharge zones, and
groundwater flow patterns in recharge areas tend to develop a somewhat radial pattern
from the center of the recharge area outward toward the discharge areas and are
expected to mimic surface topography. The Roxboro Plant is bordered to the west,
south, and east by areas of topographic highs. The surface water flow direction for the
plant is to the north toward Hyco Lake.
Groundwater beneath the Plant area occurs within the residuum/partially weathered
rock or competent bedrock at depths ranging from three to 20 feet below land surface
(bls) along the downgradient compliance boundary and greater than 35 feet bls
upgradient of the ash basin. Routine water level measurements and corresponding
elevations from the compliance monitoring well network indicate that groundwater
generally flows from upland areas along the south, west, and eastern boundaries
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
towards the north and Hyco Lake. Groundwater generally flows from the south to the
north along the western portion of the property and from the southwest to the northeast
across the remainder of the property. The approximate groundwater gradient along the
western portion of the property for July 2014 data was 85.04 feet (vertical change) over
530 feet (horizontal distance) or 16 feet/100 feet as measured from upgradient
background well BG-1 to downgradient well CW-2. The approximate groundwater
gradient along the northern compliance boundary for July 2014 was slightly less at 76.64
feet (vertical change) over 570 feet (horizontal distance) or 13.4 feet over 100 feet as
measured from well CW-1 to downgradient well CW-2. Groundwater elevation data
collected from the two well pairs indicate the vertical gradient tends to be upward or
neutral between the transition zone and upper bedrock.
Page 5
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
4.0 MONITORING PROGRAM
4.1 Regulatory Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring
The NPDES program regulates wastewater discharges to surface waters to ensure that
surface water quality standards are maintained. The Roxboro Plant operates under
NPDES Permit NC0003425 which authorizes discharge as follows:
• Ash Basin Treatment System (Internal Outfall 002L To treat ash transport, low
volume wastewater including Reverse -Osmosis (RO) wastewater, runoff from
the ash landfill, dry fly -ash handling system wash water, coal pile runoff silo
wash water, storm water runoff, cooling tower blowdown from unit number 4,
and domestic sewage treatment plant effluent. Effluent from the ash basin
discharges to the heated water discharge canal and is ultimately released into
Hyco Lake through Outfall 003.
• Heated Water Discharge Canal System (Outfall 003): At the point that the
discharge canal enters Hyco Lake, it contains flow from several waste streams
including: once -through cooling water, stormwater runoff, and the effluent from
the ash basin (Internal Outfall 002).
• Cooling Tower Blowdown System (Internal Outfall 005): Cooling tower
blowdown from unit number 4 discharges into the ash transport system and
ultimately flows into the ash basin (Internal Outfall 002).
• Coal Pile Runoff Treatment System (Outfall 006): This system handles runoff
from the coal pile and other coal handling areas including the limestone and
gypsum piles and the truck wheel wash water. These waters are routed to a
retention basin for treatment by neutralization, sedimentation, and equalization
prior to being discharged directly to Hyco Lake.
• Domestic Wastewater Treatment System (Internal Outfall 008): Effluent from the
treatment system flows into the ash basin. Effluent from the ash basin discharges
into the heated water discharge canal.
• Chemical Metal Cleaning Treatment System (Internal Outfall 009) This waste
stream may occasionally be discharged to the ash basin treatment system. It
contains chemical metal cleaning wastes. Effluent from the ash basin discharges
into the heated water discharge canal.
Page 6
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
• Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Treatment Svstem (Internal Outfall 010): This
waste steam is generated from blowdown from the FGD treatment unit. After
treatment in the bioreactors, effluent is discharged into the heated water
discharge canal upstream from Internal Outfall 002, and is ultimately released
into Hyco Lake through Outfall 003.
In addition to surface water monitoring, the NPDES permit requires groundwater
monitoring. Permit Condition A (6) Attachment XX, dated March 17, 2011, lists the
groundwater monitoring wells to be sampled, the parameters and constituents to be
measured and analyzed, and the requirements for sampling frequency and results
reporting. Attachment XX also provides requirements for well location and well
construction. The as -built well information is summarized in Table 1 and the
constituent list, analytical methods, preservatives and holding times are summarized in
Table 2. The well logs for the listed wells are provided in Appendix A. A copy of
Attachment XX is included as Appendix B.
The compliance boundary for groundwater quality associated with the Roxboro Plant
ash basins is defined in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being established at
either 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever is
closer to the source.
In accordance with the March 17, 2011 Groundwater Monitoring Plan, analytical results
have been submitted to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) before the last day
of the month following the date of sampling. In the future, analytical results will be
submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling.
4.2 Description of Groundwater Monitoring System
The current NPDES groundwater monitoring plan for the Roxboro Plant includes the
sampling of eight wells surrounding the active ash basin. These eight wells include one
background well and seven downgradient wells. The locations of the monitoring wells,
the waste boundary, and the compliance boundary are shown on Figure 2.
In addition to the eight wells sampled as part of the NPDES permit, the Roxboro Plant
samples six monitoring wells and collects landfill leachate samples from four locations
associated with the active CCR landfill in accordance with a second permit issued by
DENR's Solid Waste Section. The locations of these sample points are shown on Figure
2.
Page 7
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
Well construction data for all 14 monitoring wells (active basin and landfill) is provided
in Table 1 and Appendix A. Figure 3 is an example of the construction of a typical
monitoring well.
Based on water levels measured from site wells, the general direction of groundwater
flow in the vicinity of the 1966 East Ash Basin and the CCR landfill is to the northwest,
toward the plant. The general direction of groundwater flow in the vicinity of the
active West Ash Basin is to north, towards the heated water discharge canal system.
The site wells provide monitoring data for the groundwater downgradient of the ash
basins.
The NPDES compliance monitoring network includes one background monitoring well,
BG-1, and seven downgradient compliance boundary monitoring wells: CW-1, CW-2,
CW-2D, CW-3, CW-3D, CW-4, and CW-5.
Wells CW-31) and CW-4D were installed in the upper bedrock and were paired with
shallow wells CW-3 and CW-4, which were installed above the bedrock, to monitor the
vertical hydraulic gradient in the area and aquifer conditions within the shallow
bedrock. The remainder of the compliance boundary wells were installed in the
saprolite or residuum, above bedrock.
4.3 Monitoring Frequency
The monitoring wells will be sampled three times per year in April, July, and
November.
4.4 Sample Parameters and Methods
The monitoring program consists of sampling and analysis for parameters and
constituents identified in Permit Condition A (6), Attachment XX of the NPDES permit
(Appendix B). The parameters and the analytical methods are presented in Table 2.
It is proposed that monitoring for aluminum be discontinued. Aluminum is a very
common, naturally -occurring element in soil and rocks of the area. A preliminary
statistical evaluation indicates that aluminum concentrations in site groundwater were
determined not to be a statistically significant increase over the background well data
set. Further, aluminum is not consistently monitored across the entirety of Duke
Energy facilities, and there is no 2L Standard for aluminum.
The analytical results for the detection monitoring program will be compared to the NC
2L Standards or the site -specific background concentrations.
Page 8
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
4.5 Data Quality Objectives
The overall Quality Assurance (QA) objective is to ensure that reliable data of known
and acceptable quality are provided. All measurements will be documented to yield
results that are representative of the groundwater quality. Data will be calculated and
reported in units as required by the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR).
The analytical QA objectives for precision, accuracy, and completeness have been
established by the laboratory(s) in accordance with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) or other accepted agencies for each measurement variable where
possible. The objectives are outlined in the Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Procedures Manual and are available upon request.
Appropriate methods have been selected to meet applicable standards for groundwater
quality. Instances may occur, however, in which the condition of the sample will not
allow detection of the desired limits for various parameters either because of matrix
interference or high analyte concentrations requiring sample dilution. The laboratory(s)
will provide sufficient documentation with each data package to notify reviewers about
any analytical problems with the data, if needed.
Page 9
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
5.1 Sampling Equipment and Cleaning Procedures
Development and sampling equipment shall be selected to ensure that materials are
compatible with the sample parameters and comply with state and federal regulatory
requirements for sampling.
New disposable sampling equipment (peristaltic pump tubing) is used for each
monitoring well sampled. For non -dedicated equipment used, such as water level tapes
and submersible pumps, the equipment will be cleaned before and after use in each
well in accordance with standard EPA -approved cleaning procedures for field
equipment. This standard is outlined in the Standard Operating Procedures and
Quality Assurance Manual, Engineering Support Branch, EPA Region IV, February 1,
1991 as revised December 20, 2011.
5.2 Groundwater Sampling
5.2.1 Development of Monitoring Wells
Monitoring wells addressed in this sampling plan have been developed.
If new monitoring wells are installed, they will be developed prior to initial
sampling. Development removes silt that has settled into the bottom of the well
following installation and removes fine silt and clay particles from the well
screen and sand -pack surrounding the screen. Well development is necessary to
eliminate potential clogging and enhance well performance. Development
involves removing an estimated ten or more well volumes from the well using a
submersible pump with up-and-down agitation to loosen particles from the well
screen. If the turbidity for a well increases over time, the well may be re-
developed to restore conditions.
5.2.2 Groundwater Level and Total Depth Measurements
Water level measurements are collected and recorded to determine the
groundwater elevation and flow direction. Site monitoring wells have been
surveyed to determine the elevation of the top of well casing (TOC). Water level
measurements are referenced to the TOC and recorded to the nearest one -
hundredth of a foot.
Water level measurements are made with an electronic measuring device
consisting of a spool of dual -conductor wire and sensor. When the sensor comes
in contact with water, the circuit is closed and a meter light and/or buzzer
Page 10
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
attached to the spool signal the contact. When the signal is sounded, the water
level is recorded on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4). To
minimize sample turbidity, low flow sample methods are used whenever
possible. Using low -flow sampling techniques, the volume of the stagnant water
in the well is not calculated and the total well depth is not routinely measured to
avoid disturbing the bottom sediments. If conditions indicate a possible problem
with the integrity of a well, the total well depth may be measured.
5.2.3 Well Purging and Sampling
The selection of purging technique is dependent on the hydrogeologic properties
of the aquifer and hydraulic characteristics of each well. Hydraulic conductivity,
water column, well volume, screen length, and other information are evaluated
to select the purging technique to acquire groundwater representative of the
aquifer conditions. At the Roxboro Plant, a low -flow purging technique has been
selected as the most appropriate technique to minimize sample turbidity.
During low -flow purging and sampling, groundwater is pumped into a flow -
through chamber at flow rates that minimize or stabilize water level drawdown
within the well. At the Roxboro facility, low -flow sampling is conducted using a
peristaltic pump or low -flow submersible pump with new tubing. The intake for
the tubing is lowered to the mid -point of the screened interval. A multi -
parameter water quality monitoring instrument is used to measure field
indicator parameters within the flow -through chamber during purging.
Measurements include pH, specific conductance, and temperature.
Indicator parameters are measured over time (usually at 3-5 minute intervals).
When parameters have stabilized within ±0.2 pH units and ±10 percent for
temperature and specific conductivity over three consecutive readings,
representative groundwater has been achieved for sampling. Turbidity is not a
required stabilization parameter, however turbidity levels of 10 NTU or less are
targeted.
The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) is used to record purge data
and field measurements.
Instrument calibration is performed and documented before the beginning of the
sampling event, at midday, and after each sampling event. The pH subsystem is
calibrated with three pH standards (pH 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0) bracketing the
expected groundwater pH. The pH calibration is then verified using a different
pH 7.0 buffer. The specific conductance subsystem is calibrated using one
Page 11
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
standard and verified using a different specific conductance buffer. Calibration
results are recorded on a Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5).
5.3 Sample Collection
Groundwater samples are collected after the indicator parameters have stabilized.
Sampling personnel wear new, clean, disposable, non -powdered nitrile gloves at each
location. Samples are collected in the order of the volatilization sensitivity of the
parameters:
• Metals, metalloids, and selenium
• Sulfate, nitrate and chloride
• Total dissolved solids
Groundwater samples are preserved and stored according to parameter -specific
methods and delivered to the laboratory under proper Chain -of -Custody (COC)
procedures. All pertinent notations, water -level measurements, removed well volumes,
and indicator parameters are documented on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet
(Figure 4).
5.4 Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Time
Sample containers supplied by the laboratory shall be new and pre -cleaned as approved
by EPA procedures appropriate for the parameters of interest. Table 2 summarizes the
sample containers, sample volume, preservation procedures, and holding times
required for each type of sample and parameter for the monitoring program. Sample
containers will be kept closed until used. Sample containers will be provided by Duke
Energy or vendor laboratories.
5.5 Sample Tracking
The COC procedures allow for tracking the possession and handling of individual
samples from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis and report
preparation. Samples are logged by the laboratory with a unique tracking number for
each sample. An example of the COC Record is provided as Figure 6.
5.6 Sample Labeling
Sample containers shall be pre -labeled and organized prior to field activities as part of
the pre -sampling staging process. As samples are collected, the sampling personnel
write the following information directly on the label: sampling date and time, and
initials of sample collector. This information is also recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheet (Figure 4) and the COC Record (Figure 6).
Page 12
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
5.7 Field Documentation
Field documentation from each sampling event is recorded on the Groundwater
Monitoring Data Sheets (Figure 4), the Field Sampling Calibration Form (Figure 5), and
the Chain -of -Custody Record (Figure 6). Additionally, a Groundwater Sampling Site
Checklist (Figure 7), or equivalent, is completed indicating information about the
monitoring wells such as proper identification (ID) tag and condition of protective
casing and pad. Field notations shall be made during the course of the field work to
document the following information:
• Identification of well
• Well depth
• Static water level depth and measurement technique
• Well yield — high or low
• Purge volume or pumping rate
• Sample identification numbers
• Well evacuation procedure/equipment
• Sample withdrawal procedure/equipment
• Date and time of collection
• Types of sample containers used
• Identification of replicates or blind samples
• Preservative(s) used
• Parameters requested for analysis
• Field analysis data and methods
• Sample distribution and transporter
• Field observations during sampling event
• Name of sample collector(s)
• Climatic conditions including estimate of air temperature
The Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheet, Field Sampling Calibration Form, and COC
Record and Analysis Request Form will be filed by project and date. Recorded entries
will be made on electronic forms or on paper forms in indelible ink. Errors on paper
documents will be corrected by drawing a line through the error, initialing and dating
the correction, and starting a new entry on the next line (if necessary).
Page 13
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
5.8 Chain -of -Custody Record
The COC Record (Figure 6) accompanies the sample(s), traces sample possession from
time of collection to delivery to the laboratory(s), and clearly identifies which sample
containers have been designated for each requested analysis. The record includes the
following types of information:
• Sample identification number
• Signature of collector
• Date and time of collection
• Sample type (e.g., groundwater, immiscible layer)
• Identification of well
• Number of containers
• Parameters requested for analysis
• Preservative(s) used
• Signature of persons involved in the chain of possession
• Inclusive dates of possession
5.9 Sample Custody, Shipment, and Laboratory Receipt
For the purpose of these procedures, a sample is considered in custody if it is:
• In actual possession of the responsible person
• In view, after being in physical possession
• Locked or sealed in a manner so that no one can tamper with it after having been
in physical custody or in a secured area restricted to authorized personnel.
Samples shall be maintained in the custody of the sampling crew during the sampling
event. At the end of each sampling day and prior to the transfer of the samples off site,
entries shall be completed on the COC form for all samples. Upon transfer of custody,
the COC form is signed by a sampling crew member, including the date and time. If
outside vendor laboratories are utilized, samples shall be delivered to these facilities by
Duke Energy personnel or courier.
COC forms received by the laboratory(s) shall be signed and dated by the respective
supervising scientist(s) or their designee (at the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
lab) or the laboratory sample custodian (at vendor labs) immediately following receipt
by the laboratory. The analysts at the laboratory(s) maintain a sample tracking record
Page 14
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
that will follow each sample through all stages of laboratory processing. The sample
tracking records show the date of sample extraction or preparation and analysis. These
records are used to determine compliance with holding time limits during lab audits
and data validation.
Custody procedures followed by Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services laboratory
personnel are described in detail in the Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services
Procedures Manual.
Page 15
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
6.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The main analytical laboratory used in this program is the Duke Energy Analytical
Laboratory Services: N.C. Drinking Water (NC37804) and Wastewater (#248)
Certifications. The organizational structure and staff qualifications of the laboratory are
discussed in its generic Quality Assurance Program (QAP). The QAP and the
Analytical Laboratory Procedures Manual are available for review upon request.
Vendor laboratories that meet EPA and North Carolina certification requirements may
be used for analyses with approval by Duke Energy.
The analytical procedures used for the samples analyzed for this Groundwater
Monitoring Program are listed in Table 2. Specific conductance, field pH, and
temperature are measured in the field according to the Duke Energy Groundwater
Monitoring and Sample Collection Procedure or the instrument manufacturer
instructions.
Page 16
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
7.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
Internal laboratory quality control (QC) checks used by the laboratories are described in
each laboratory's generic QAP and procedures manual. Using the internal laboratory
QC checks, the laboratories demonstrate the ability to produce acceptable results using
the methods specified.
Internal quality control checks for sampling procedures and laboratory analyses will be
conducted with each sampling event. These checks will consist of the preparation and
submittal of field blanks, trip (travel) blanks, and/or field replicates for analysis of all
parameters at frequencies described in the laboratory(s) procedures manuals.
The field QC blanks and replicates that may be included as internal QC checks are
described below. The specific type and number of blanks used may vary depending on
the sampling event and will be determined by the Duke Energy field sampling
personnel:
• Field Blanks: A field blank consists of a sample container filled in the field with
organic free, deionized, or distilled water prepared and preserved in the same
manner as the samples. The field blank is transported to the laboratory with the
samples and analyzed along with the field samples for the constituents of
interest to check for contamination imparted to the samples by the sample
container, preservative, or other exogenous sources. Field blanks are typically
utilized for each sampling event. The field blanks are typically analyzed for
major anions, cations and metals.
• Trip Blanks: A trip (travel) blank is a sample container filled with organic -free
water in the laboratory that travels unopened with the sample bottles. Trip
blanks are typically utilized when sampling for volatile organic compounds. The
trip blank is returned to the laboratory with the field samples and analyzed
along with the field samples for parameters of interest.
• Equipment Blanks: If non -dedicated equipment is used, it is recommended that
equipment blanks be collected. The field equipment is cleaned following
documented cleaning protocols. An aliquot of the final control rinse water is
passed over the cleaned equipment directly into a sample container and
submitted for analyses.
Page 17
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
• Field Replicates: A field replicate is a duplicate sample prepared at the sampling
locations from equal portions of all sample aliquots combined to make the
sample. Both the field replicate and the sample are collected at the same time, in
the same container type, preserved in the same way, and analyzed by the same
laboratory as a measure of sampling and analytical precision.
Page 18
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
8.0 VALIDATION OF FIELD DATA PACKAGE
The field data package includes all of the field records and measurements developed by
the sampling team personnel. The field data package validation will be performed by
Duke Energy personnel. The procedure for validation consists of the following:
• A review of field data contained on the Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets for
completeness.
• Verification that equipment blanks, field blanks, and trip blanks were properly
prepared, identified, and analyzed.
• A check of the Field Sampling Calibration Form for equipment calibration and
instrument conditions.
• A review of the COC Record for proper completion, signatures of field personnel
and the laboratory sample custodian, dates and times, and for verification that
the correct analyses were specified.
Page 19
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
9.0 VALIDATION OF LABORATORY DATA
The laboratory will perform a validation review of the submitted samples and
analytical results to ensure that the laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.
Page 20
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
10.0 REPORT SUBMITTAL
Two copies of the report of the monitoring results for the compliance wells will be
submitted to the DWR within 60 days of the date of sampling. The monitoring results
will be submitted on NCDENR Form GW-59CCR.
The DWR will be notified in the event that vendor lab analyses have not been
completed within this time frame. Groundwater Monitoring Data Sheets, Field
Calibration Forms, Chain -of -Custody Records, Laboratory QA data, and Data
Validation Checklists shall be kept on file by Duke Energy and are available upon
request.
Page 21
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

Groundwater Monitoring Program October 2014
oxboro Steam Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
11.0 REFERENCES
Hibbard, James P., Glenn S. Shell, Phillip J. Bradley, Scott D. Samson, and Greg L.
Wortman, February 1998, The Hyco shear zone in North Carolina and southern
Virginia: Implications for the Piedmont Zone -Carolina Zone boundary in the southern
Appalachians. American Journal of Science, V. 298, p. 85 —107.
Hibbard, James P., Edward F. Stoddard, Donald T. Secor, and Allen J. Dennis, 2002, The
Carolina Zone: overview of Neoproterozoic to Early Paleozoic peri-Gondwanan terranes
along the eastern Flank of the southern Appalachians. Earth -Science Reviews, V. 57, p.
299 - 339.
North Carolina Geological Survey, 1985, Geologic Map of North Carolina. North Carolina
Geological Survey, General Geologic Map, scale 1:500000.
USGS, December 2007, Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States:
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina. United
States Geological Survey Open -File Report 2005-1323, Version 1.1.
Wilkins, James K., Glenn S. Shell, and James P. Hibbard, 1995, Geologic contrasts across
the central Piedmont Suture in north -central North Carolina. South Carolina Geology,
V. 37, p. 25 — 32.
Page 22
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ GW Monitoring
Plan\Roxboro GW Monitoring Plan.docx

FIGURES

I: !.4 1
p, V C1� -
v
' `:=•tom::: �� . .-�7 Fjiv.
�Ji Jt � ~�f '• � ~�� \ � .I' 'l\�•. '�,ill J L: E.e - t� \ "_ —
� � c .. ': -F, rif •,t r '. ;r' ��� .,H� `� ' � -a L„Jr yr '��—n��
FXQ
�: •.
�1'''1 i �r�:-1i'�'���-fly���,''.�. �:� V� � .�, • ..1�-�'J:'�n�f � ��j � � •}_ _ ,iYYr, L--•'
ry
jam: _ __ • •�--� ��-✓�_-
i
500' COMPLIANCE'
BOUNDARY a l-gam
s
4 f:y L
'PROPERTY BOUNDARY
� 'ti �''�l' � .0 J�-5'-�:i� �fS ',_`�F�_j I, y � � s5�}r�l�� �• ,'��
Cam` i� ' f ��r - � _ s •-��'' S J �
f 1 C
` _��- n� ir�• - _ - _-�- �rJ-- f — �-5°"�� � __� 1,
-
` fir:; 7 r r'(�[�; � �..• I' ' n, . '� ��-,---. ' �' � ,-
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OBTAINED FROM THE NRCS GEOSPATIAL DATA GATEWAY AT ` r ! I`� ,:?c��., • �.�, r. • ` - "y
http.//datagatew y.nres.usda.gov/ ��~ 4.'- ( �W ti _ ' I•y^ '' f
ROXBORO POWER PLANT FIGURE 1
PERSON COUNTY
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
VIP DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
GREE"SB°RO0 ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
•RALEIGH
era GREENVILLE. 1700 DUNWAY RD
WnT
°""R`°E SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
•FAYETTEVILLE
OLIVE HILL, NC QUADRANGLE
148 RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
WILMINGTGN
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: S.ARLEDGE DATE:zm4ao-os GRAPHIC SCALE
PHONE [phone] PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB CONTOUR INTERVAL: 10ft 1000 0 1000 2000
www.synterracorp.com LAYOUT: FIG 1(SITE LOCATION) MAP DATE: 1994
IN FEET

�.�, :. , �• - } Y LEGEND
+ ' ' 7,
BG-1 BACKGROUND MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
CW-1 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
LANDFILL MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
• ,' 1 ' :+y �' .'' a ' - �yp�LROPO 1'' - i • ASH LANDFILL L ACHA E SAMPLE LOCATION
RAILROAD .r - A P-2 (APPROXIMATE)
V#' DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ROXBORO PLANT
y S*-slily_ }'` _ - • l -' 500 k COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
`{• �, *_Yv > J _ r•r' ' J� WASTE BOUNDARY
GYPSUMPADAl
W-
�
7 •��-�_ .- s �• 9CMW-6 �i _ 1 f.
1966
SEMI -ACTIVE
N
1'OUTFiL 003 _ ✓4 a ri ASHBASIN /
j LINED
LANDFILL
-
- CHIMNEY
DRAINS
--- - - -
-- - - - -- --- - -
- I .:
,•f-4 _
SOURCES:
1. 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH
}.�1 CAROLINA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USGS EARTH EXPLORER
WEB SITE AT http://earthexplorenusg5.gov/
y - 2. WELL SURVEY INFORMATION, PROPERTY LINE, LANDFILL
LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES ARE FROM ARCGIS FILES PROVIDED
•+ ' - '. �" x' yr+ BYS&ME AND PROGRESS ENERGY.
b T'
3. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP
FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
4. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH
CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM FPS 3200
- - , DUNNAWAYRD •�' /r.:. t
1973
ACTIVE
ASHBASIN G ,s' - - '•J.2a2•..• I + ci
r
AA
{ yH'A
WOODLAND
_ ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
J.
iTerra
y
r'
r47�y� {� '
1 ' - - - , • ��, -
• +iw ' "' -,r '
'.
148 River Street, Suite 220
T+;
: ti F
-�-,
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
- •
?.
864-421-9999
, f , _
www.synterracorp.com
DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE
DATE: 2014-10-09
-
CHECKED BY: J. WYLIE
DATE: 2014-10-09
PROJECT MANAGER: K. WEBB
LAYOUT NAME: FIG 2 SAMPLE LOCATION (11X17
_
<C'DUKE
ENERGY
'
PROGRESS
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
1700 DUNNAWAY RD
SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
•,
Y
FIGURE 2
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
' arr,.oa-

ABOVEGROUND WELL PROTECTOR
(4 INCH X Ls INCH X 5 FOOT STEEL CASING WITH
HINGED LOCKABLE LID)
2'-6' TO Y-0" (NOMINAL)
STICK-UP
NEAT CEMENT OR NEAT CEMENT BENTONITE
MIX FROM BENTONITE SEAL TO GROUN❑
SURFACE
WELL SCREEN
(0.010" MANUFACTURED SLOTS, TYPICAL)
WELL PACKING
(TYP. #1 OR #2 SAND)
MALE PVC PLUG
DRILL J" DIAMETER VENT HOLE BELOW
PLUG
2' ❑IA. PVC
WELL CASING GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE PAD
6" MIN. 2 FT X 2 FT SQUARE
BORING
(8' NOMINAL DIAMETER)
BENTONITE SEAL
2' -0" (MINIMUM)
2'-0' (MINIMUM)
SCREEN LENGTH VARIES
(5' TO 15' TYP,)
b±" OF WELL SAND
_Typical Well Construction Details_
(no scale)
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, I I C
�7
synTerra
RIVER STREET, SUITE 220
:ENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29601
)NE [phone]
BY: H. Frank Date: 8/21/2014
T MANAGER: Kathy Webb
FIGURE 3
GENERALIZED WELL SCHEMATIC

FIGURE 4
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
LOW FLOW SAMPLING LOG
FIELD PERSONNEL:
synTerra
WEATHER: ❑ SUNNY ❑ OVERCAST ❑ RAIN TEMPERATURE (APPROX):
148 River Street, Suite 220
NOTES'
'
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
[phone] • [phone] Fax
www.synTerracorp.com
WELL ID:
PUMP/TUBING INTAKE DEPTH: (FT)
START PURGE TIME:
MEASURING POINT:
START PURGE DATE:
END PURGE TIME:
WELL DIAMETER:
(IN)
END PURGE DATE:
FINAL READING TIME:
WELL DEPTH:
(FT) TOTAL VOLUME PURGED: (GAL)
DEPTH TO WATER:
(FT)
SAMPLE DATE:
SAMPLE COLLECTION
TIME:
PURGE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump
❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
SAMPLE METHOD: ❑ Grundfos Pump
❑ 12 Volt Pump
❑ Peristaltic Pump ❑ Dedicated Pump
❑ Teflon Bailer ❑ Polyethylene Bailer
WATER LEVEL
FLOW RATE
TEMPERATURE
CONDUCTANCE
DO
pH
ORP*
TURBIDITY*
TIME
(FT)
(mL/min)
(° Celsius)
(µS/cm)
(mg/L)
(su)
(mV)
(NTU)
NOTES
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
PRESERVATION
w
z
w
r
w
r
v
v
u
m
F
w
w
a
a
a
o
w
O
O
lg7
lg7
tJ7
vi
E
E
z
E
E
in
E
o
E
o
E
n
o
o
a
x
b
=
w
_
CONSTITUENTS SAMPLED
N
J
N__=
Z
Z
o
COMMENTS: FIELD VEHICLE ACCESSIBLE ❑ YES ❑ NO
Associated midday/end-of-day pH check within ±0.1 std unts? ❑ YES ❑ No. If NO, pH data reported on this sheet should be considered as
flagged accordingly
* SynTerra is not NC -certified for these parameters. Data collected for information purposes only
WELL TAG PROTECTIVE CASING LOCK CAP CONCRETE PAD
] GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONE ❑ GOOD ❑ BAD ❑ NONI

4VT
synTerra
Instrument ID: YSI-556-MPS
Analyst:
Instrument Calibration Log
SynTerra Corporation
148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
NC Field Parameter Certification No. 5591
Date:
Location:
pH Initial Calibration (standard units)
Reference Method: SW846 9040C
Cal. Time Cal. Buffer 4.0 Cal. Buffer 7.0 Cal Buffer 10.0 *Check Buffer 7.0
{pH buffer checks are to be within ± 0.1 pH units of the standards true value
4 Buffer Reference:
7 Buffer Reference:
10 Buffer Reference:
Check Buffer Reference:
H Calibration Check (standard units
Time Check Buffer True Value *Check Buffer Measured Value
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
Other
*pH buffer checks are to be within ± 0.1 pH units of the standards true value
Check Buffer Reference: Action Required:
Specific Conductance (umhos/cm)
Reference Method: SW846 9050A
Time
Calibration Std 1413
Verification Std 1413
Initial Cal
Mid -Day
Not Applicable
End -of -Day
Not Applicable
*Verification standard ± 10 percent of the standards true value
Calibration Standard Reference: Verification Standard Reference:
Action Required:
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
Reference Method: SM 4500 0 G-2001
Time
Temp
°C
Barometric Pressure
mm H
Meter DO Reading
m /L
Correction
Factor
Theoretical DO
m /L
Initial
Mid -Day
End -of -Day
theoretical llU = llU trom "Dissolved Uxygen Meter Ualibration V entication" Table at ambient temp X Uorrection Factor at barometric Pressure
Theoretical DO and Meter DO reading within + 0.5 mg/l, if not calibrate meter.
Action Required:
C: \ Users \ hfrank.SYNTERRACORP \ Desktop \ Instrument Calibration Form Rev6 556 MPS.docx

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD AND ANALYSIS REQUEST FORM
Duke r --------------------------------------------------------------------
Duke Energy Analytical Lab Services i i Analytical Laboratory Use Only i
Samples
PoftvEnergy-
Mail Code 9MG03A2
Hager (Building 7405) i iLIMS# Originating NC 1 13339 Hagers Ferry Rd i i From SC i
Huntersville, N. C. 28078 i ILogged By Date & Time SAMPLE PROGRAM I
For Detailed Instructions, see: [phone] i
http:Hdewww/essenv/coc/ Groundwater
Fax: [phone] i i NPIDES
d
a
E
0
U
N
3
E
as
E
0
3
U
1)Project Name
2)Phone No:
3)Client
4)Fax No:
5)Business Unit: 20036
6)Process:
7)Resp. To:
8)Project ID:
9)Activity ID:
10)Mail Code:
.---.—..—..—..—..,
i LAB USE ONLY i
'ZChem Desktop
"Lab ID I No.
I I
I I
I I m
:E
I I o
a
I I �
i iU
Customer to sign
or ID
Vendor Drinking Water
UST
i Cooler Temp (C) P(PA IAi..ro !
"Preserv.:1=HCL
2=H2SO4 3=HNO3
:MR#
i
Customer to complete all apu
NON -SHADED areas
14Collection Information E
0
Date I Time Signature 19
9Page 1 of 1
DISTRIBUTION
ORIGINAL to LAB,
COPY to CLIENT
0
21)Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
v
L
22Requested Turnaround
N
Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
m
r
14 Days
v
OQ.
Relinquished By
Date/Time
Accepted By
Date/Time
E
`7
0
0
Days
23)Seal/Locked By
Date/Time
Sealed/Lock Opened By
Date/Time
o .9 r
'48Hr
w
v
`Other
24)Comments
a
' Add. Cost Will Apply

NORTH CAROLINA GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SITE CHECKLIST
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
LOCATION / SITE
SITE CONTACT
WEATHER
SAMPLE DATE
FIELD CREW
------------------
ACCESS TO WELLS
Access cleared into well
Access cleared around well
Fallen tree blocking access
------------------
WELL SECURITY
------------------
Well found locked
Well found unlocked
------------------
WELL LOCK CONDITION
Lock in good condition
Replaced damaged lock
------------------
WELL CASINGS
------------------
Damaged .
Damaged - ..ir requiredCONCRETE
------------------
------------------
PADS
Pad in good condition
Minor cracks
Major cracks / broken / repair required
Undermined / washing out
Fire ants around concrete pad
------------------
WELL PROTECTIVE CASINGS
Casing in good condition
Damaged .
Damaged - ..ir requiredAnts
------------------
Broken hinge on protective lid
Wasp nest inside protective casing
inside protective casing
------------------
------------------
Well cap in good conclion
Damaged / needs replacement
Replaced damaged well cap
------------------
FLUSH MOUNT WELLS
Vault in good sondition
Water inside vault
VaultboiE�� broken or stripped
Bolts stripped
Vault lid cracked or broken
------------------
WELL ID TAGS
Well tag in good condition
- .. goWell
------------------
tag damaged / illegible
Lacks required information - Driller Reg #
some - . .. -
------------------
Lacks required information - Total well depth
Lacks required information - Non potable tag
NOTE:
Figure 7. North Carolina Groundwater Sampling Checklist

TABLES

Table 1
Monitoring Well Information
Duke Energy Progress, Inc./Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Roxboro, North Carolina
Well ID
Date Installed
Northing
Easting
Use
Type of Casing
Well Diameter
(inches)
Top of Casing Elevation
(NAVD 88)
Well Depth*
(TOC)
Well Screen Interval*
(feet BGS)
Screen Length
(feet)
BG-1
11/2/2010
987882.09
1976145.85
Background
PVC
2.0
533.69
54.79
32.5 - 52.0
19.5
CW-1
10/29/2010
994400.36
1983011.60
Compliance
PVC
2.0
508.05
42.61
19.95 - 39.75
19.8
CW-2
10/29/2010
993052.83
1977461.87
Compliance
PVC
2.0
424.26
20.44
7.7 - 17.5
9.8
CW-21)
10/28/2010
993048.53
1977467.96
Compliance
PVC
2.0
424.33
32.68
25.1 - 29.9
4.8
CW-3
10/26/2010
988904.17
1977321.05
Compliance
PVC
2.0
451.69
14.26
3.4 - 11.4
8.0
CW-31)
10/29/2010
988904.24
1977313.12
Compliance
PVC
2.0
451.45
49.56
41.7 - 46.5
4.8
CW-4
11/1/2010
987735.98
1978597.13
Compliance
PVC
2.0
479.66
42.23
24.2 - 39.0
14.8
CW-5
11/3/2010
993026.35
1978359.59
Compliance
PVC
2.0
459.51
22.20
4.7 - 19.5
14.8
GMW-6
3/13/2002
994181.00
1981025.00
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
481.46
66.88
30 - 45
15.0
GMW-7
6/28/2010
992329.27
1980976.99
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
500.59
57.38
39 - 54
15.0
GMW-8
3/13/2002
991787.00
1982166.00
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
529.78
45.78
53 - 63
10.0
GMW-9
3/13/2002
991691.00
1983100.00
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
537.46
48.73
30 - 45
15.0
GMW-10
9/25/2002
994328.21
1981349.79
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
495.19
48.55
30 - 45
15.0
GMW-11
9/28/2002
994307.14
1981690.15
DENR Solid
Waste
PVC
2.0
497.23
49.04
30 - 45
15.0
Prepared By: AJY Checked By: LL
TOC - Top of Casing
BGS - Below Ground Surface
NAVD 88 - A vertical control datum in the United States by the general adjustment of 1988
* - Well depths are based upon field observations. Screen intervals are based on well installation logs.
PADuke Energy Progress. 1 026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Del iverables\Roxboro\GW Monitoring Plan\Tables\Tables 1 and 2

Table 2
Sample Parameters, Analytical Methods, Containers, Preservatives, and
Holding Times
Duke Energy Progress, Inc./Roxboro Steam Electric Plant
Roxboro, North Carolina
PARAMETER
UNITS
I CONTAINERS
PRESERVATIVESJ
HOLDING TIMES
Analytical Method
Field Parameters
Field pH
SU
Flow -through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Specific Conductivity
mmhos/cm
Flow -through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Temperature
°C
Flow -through Cell
None
Analyze Immediately
YSI 556 Multi -Meter
Water Level
ft
-
Water Level Meter
Laboratory Analysis
Aluminum
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Antimony
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Arsenic
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Barium
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Boron
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Cadmium
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Chloride
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
EPA 300.0
Chromium (total)
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Copper
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Iron
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Lead
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Manganese
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Mercury
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
EPA 245.1
Nickel
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Nitrate (as Nitrogen)
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
48 hours
EPA 300.0
Selenium
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Sulfate
mg/L
125 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
EPA 300.0
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
250 ml HDPE
Cool 4° C
28 days
SM 2540C
Thallium
µg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.8
Zinc
mg/L
500 ml HDPE
pH < 2 HNO3
6 months
TRM / EPA 200.7
Prepared By: HJF Checked By: JAW
Notes:
SU - Standard Units
mS/cm - micro siemen per centimeter
ft - feet
my - milli volts
mg/L - milligrams per liter
µg/L - micrograms per liter
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units
TRM - Total Recoverable Metals
EPA - Environmental Protection Agency
SM - Standard Method
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables\Roxboro\GW Monitoring Plan\Tables\Tables 1 and 2

APPENDIX A
BORING LOGS AND MONITORING WELL
CONSTRUCTION LOGS

C
u
u
a
C
C
n
a
u
C
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. BG-1 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 38.81 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 11/2/10
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: 533.69
DATUM: MSL
LOGGED BY: E. Henrioues
STRATA
WELL
o
0
DETAILS
W
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
CO
g
a-ct�
p
J
J
>
C/)
w --
o
Lu
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
0.00
GS
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
TOPSOIL
0.00
CG
Moist Brown Sandy
SILT Quartz
fragments and MnO
5
stains on relict
structure
8.00
BS
RISER CASING
Diameter: 2
Dry Brown Clayey
SILT Small relic
10
Type: PVC
feldspar phenocryst
Interval:-2.48-32.5
Dry
Gray -Brown -Black
15
Sandy SILT MnO
GROUT
tains on relict
Type: Portland
ractures
20
Interval: 0-8
Dry Light Brown
Sandy SILT Matrix
ith pebble size
SEAL
angular quarts
25
Type: Bentonite
ragments (Qtz vein)
Interval: 8-29
Dry -Dense Brown
andy SILT Saprolite,
29.00
FP
robe refusal at 14' bg
30
•'
FILTERPACK
Partially Weathered
Rock Start air hammer
32.50
TSC
Type: #2 Sand
drilling. Alternating
Interval: 29-52.5
ofter -vs- harder air
35
hammer drilling,
-
ielding light brown
ine rock powder, dry
40
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Partially Weathered
Rock Less frequent
Type: 0.010
hard -vs- soft zone.
Interval: 32.5-52.0
Drilling only yields fine
45
fight brown powder
Partially Weathered
Rock Soft zone 35'-37'
50
LEGEND
bg (dry after 20
inutes)
52.00
BSC
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
52.bU
I U
Rock Granitic Gneiss
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. BG-1
#S&ME
ENGINEERING - TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-1 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 25.87 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 10/29/10
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
508.05
DATUM:
MSL
LOGGED BY:
L. Butler
STRATA
WELL
DETAILS
w
o
o
W
0
;
J
W
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
m
2
}
rn
��
a�
W
p
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
5
0.00
GS
505.91
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Residuum: Tan
Brown Fine Sandy
SILT Damp
0.00
CG
505.91
Green Brown Silty
Fine to Medium
AND Dry
10
8.00
BS
497.91
RISER CASING
Diameter: 2
Type: PVC
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
Green Brown Silty
Interval:-2.14-19.95
Fine to Coarse SAND
Dry
15
GROUT
Rock -Granitic Gneiss;
Fractures at 13', 16',
22 and from 25' to 27'
20
18.00
FP
487.91
Type: Cement
Interval: 0-8
19.95
TSC
485.96
SEAL
25
Type: Bentonite
Interval: 8-18
30
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
35
Interval: 18-40.25
40
39.75
BSC
466.16
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 19.95-39.75
LEGEND
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
® CEMENT GROUT GS GROUND SURFACE
BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-1
#S&ME
ENGINEERING • TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

u
t
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-2 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 13.77 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
DRILLING METHOD: 4" DATUM: Air Hammer 424.26 DATE DRILLED: 10/29/10 LOGGED BY: MSL
L. Butler
STRATA
WELL
0
0
0
DETAILS
a
;�
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
..
W �
C]
W
U)
p
J
W
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
GS
421.97
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Topsoil
0.00
CG
421.97
Residuum: Tan
Orange Slightly Clayey
40.00
4.50
BS
417.47
Silt
5
RISER CASING
6.50
FP
415.47
Tan Medium to Fine
Sandy Silt
10
Diameter: 2
Type: PVC
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as Silty
Fine to Coarse Sand
Interval: +2.28-7.7
Mafic cutting at 10 feet
15
GROUT
17.50
BSC
1404.47
Type: Cement
Interval: 0-4.5
SEAL
Type: Bentonite
Interval: 4.5 to 6.5
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
Interval: 6.5-18.0
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 7.7-17.5
LEGEND
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
t STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-2
#S&ME
ENGINEERING - TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-2D Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 13.78 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 10/28/10
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
424.33
DATUM:
MSL
LOGGED BY:
L. Butler
STRATA
WELL
o
0
�.
DETAILS
W
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
COO
a ct�
O
W
W
c
pV
w
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
0.00
GS
422.07
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Topsoil
0.00
CG
422.07
Residuum: Tan
Orange Slightly
Clayey SILT
5
8.00
BS
414.07
RISER CASING
Tan Fine to Medium
Very Sandy SILT
Diameter: 2
Tan Fine Slightly
Sandy SILT
10
Type: PVC
Interval: +2.26-25.1
an Fine to Medium
Sandy SILT
15
GROUT
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
Tan Silty Fine to
Type: Cement
Coarse Fine SAND
Interval: 0-8
20
22.70
FP
399.37
SEAL
Rock Granitic Gneiss
Fractured from approx.
25
25.10
TSC
396.97
Type: Bent011lte
28.0 to 28.5 Feet
Interval: 8-22.7
30
29.90
BSC
392.17
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
Interval: 22.7-30.4
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 25.1-29.9
LEGEND
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
t STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
I#WELL No. CW-2D
S&ME
ENGINEERING . TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

u
C
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-3 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 4.86 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 10/26/10
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: 451.69
DATUM: MSL
LOGGED BY:
E. Henriques
STRATA
WELL
o
0
m
DETAILS
W
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
g
w
o
J
J
cn
o
w
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
0.00
GS
449.35
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Topsoil
0.00
CG
449.35
Residuum: Tan Fine
Sandy SILT Probe
3.00
FP
446.35
Refusal -2 feet
5
3.40
TSC
445.95
RISER CASING
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
F-M Sandy SILT From
Diameter: 2
10 to 11 Feet
10
: '.
11.40
BSC
437.95
Type: PVC
Interval: +2.34-3.4
Tan Fine Sandy SILT
TD
oft/fracture zone
GROUT
Type: Cement
Interval: 0-2
SEAL
Type: Bentonite
Interval: 2-3
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
Interval: 3-11.4
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 3.4-11.4
LEGEND
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-3
#S&ME
ENGINEERING . TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-3D Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 3.63 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 10/29/10
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: 451.45
DATUM: MSL
LOGGED BY:
E_ Henriques
STRATA
WELL
z
o
J
DETAILS
W _
;
;
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
Co❑
o- 'tj
❑
W
Lu
uo
ov
w
PROTECTIVE CASING
t
0.00
GS
449.07
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Topsoil
0.00
CG
449.07
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as Dry
Fine Sandy SILT
5
Alternating softer and
RISER CASING
harder zones. Soft at
8', 9 - 9.5' and 11' bg.
Diameter: 2
Hole starts producing
10
Type: PVC
water at 8' below
Interval: +2.38-41.7
rade
Rock -Granitic Gneiss
15
Dry Very hard and
GROUT
slow drilling ( 10' per
Type: Cement
hour). No signs of
Interval: 0-31
fractures/soft zones
PO
12' - 46', no additional
water
SEAL
25
Type: Bentonite
Interval: 31-39
30
31.00
BS
418.07
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
35
Interval: 39-47
39.00
FP
410.07
SCREEN
41.70
TSC
407.37
40
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 41.7-46.5
45
46.50
BSC
402.57
Gneiss Small, soft
_
fracture zone at 46'-47'
bg. Hard Rock47'
LEGEND
El FILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
t STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-3D
#S&ME
ENGINEERING • TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

C
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-4 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 28.97 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 11/1/10
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
479.66
DATUM:
MSL
LOGGED BY:
L. Butler
STRATA
WELL
0
0
F
DETAILS
w
; t
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
m
g
acr�
O
J
J
C
ov
w
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
0.00
GS
477.44
Diameter:
Type:
Residuum: Brown
0.00
CG
477.44
Slightly Clayey SILT
Interval:
Dry Tan Brown Fine
Sandy SILT
5
8.00
BS
469.44
RISER CASING
Dry Tan Fine Slightly
Sandy SILT
Diameter: 2
Partially Weathered
10
Type: PVC
Rock: sampled as
Tan Fine Sandy SILT
Interval: +2.22-24.2
Fine Tan Slightly
Sandy SILT
15
GROUT
Type: Cement
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
Tan Fine Sandy SILT
20
22.00
FP
455.44
Interval: 0-8
Tan Slightly Sandy
Fine Sandy SILT
SEAL
24.20
TSC
453.24
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
25
Type: Bentonite
Tan Fine Sandy SILT
30
Interval: 8-22
FILTERPACK
Rock - Gneiss: felsic
Tan Slightly Sandy
SILT
Type: #2 Sand
Interval: 22-39.5
-
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
35
Tan Fine Sandy SILT
39.00
BSC
438.44
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Rock Gneiss; Mafic
Type: 0.010
Interval: 24.2-39.0
LEGEND
EIFILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTALDEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-4
#S&ME
ENGINEERING . TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

e
c
LL
COMPLETION REPORT OF WELL No. CW-5 Sheet 1 of 1
PROJECT: PROGRESS ENERGY ROXBORO PLANT
PROJECT NO: 1584-10-026 WATER LEVEL: Depth to water 9.92 feet
PROJECT LOCATION: Person County below top of casing
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: T. Whitehead
DRILLING METHOD: 4" Air Hammer
DATE DRILLED: 11/3/10
LATITUDE:
LONGITUDE:
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION:
459.51
DATUM:
MSL
LOGGED BY:
L. Butler
STRATA
WELL
DETAILS
Lu
0
o
u
0
;-
w
WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
DESCRIPTION
°O°
U)i
H—
d
o V
PROTECTIVE CASING
0
0.00
GS
457.40
Diameter:
Type:
Interval:
Residuum: Brown
Clayey SILT
0.00
CG
457.40
Dry Green Brown
Fine Sandy SILT
5
10
RISER CASING
Diameter: 2
Type: PVC
4.70
TSC
452.70
Dry Tan Fine to
Medium Very Sandy
ILT
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as Dry
Interval: +2.11-4.7
Tan Green Very Silty
Fine SAND
Gray Green Silty Fine
SAND Damp
15
20
19.50
BSC
437.90
GROUT
Type: Cement
Interval: 0-2
Partially Weathered
Rock: sampled as
Tan Green Very Silty
21.90
435.50
Fine SAND Moist
SEAL
Type: Bentonite
Interval: 2-3.5
FILTERPACK
Type: #2 Sand
Interval: 3.5-20.0
SCREEN
Diameter: 2
Type: 0.010
Interval: 4.7-19.6
LEGEND
EIFILTER PACK
■ BENTONITE TOC TOP OF CASING
GS GROUND SURFACE
® CEMENT GROUT BS BENTONITE SEAL
® CUTTINGS / BACKFILL FP FILTER PACK
TSC TOP OF SCREEN
1 STATIC WATER LEVEL BSC BOTTOM OF SCREEN
TD TOTAL DEPTH
CG CEMENT GROUT
COMPLETION REPORT OF
WELL No. CW-5
S&ME
ENGINEERING . TESTING Sheet 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

NON RESIDENTM WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
'�"Q,,", o• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
S&ME, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Sprina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#__
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable)
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) BG-1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring W Municipal/Public ❑
IndustriaUCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other p (list use)
DATE DRILLED_ 1 1-2-10
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated atfor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
e. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST
f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount
: g. WATER ZONES (depth)
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING:
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
: Top -2.48
Bottom 32.5
Ft. 2"
sch 40 PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom_ Ft. Portland pour
Top 8 Bottom 29 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
4. WELL LOCATION:
- 9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
1700 Dunnawav Road
:Top 32.5 Bottom 52 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
: Top Bottom Ft. in. in_
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
; Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley W(Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
: 10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
LATITUDE 36 ° 27 ' 5t.2000
_ " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DO
Depth Size Material
; Top 29_Bottom 52.5 FL Coarse Sand
LONGITUDE 79 ° 4 51.9900 " DMS OR 7X.XxxXXxxxx DO
: Top Bottom Ft.
LatitudeAongilude source: V3PS OTopographic map
; Top Bottom Ft.
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andatfached to
this form if not using GPS)
11. DRILLING LOG
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well Is located.)
Top Bottom Formation Description
Pmoress FnPrav Carolinas
0 14 Sandy Clay
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
14 / 47 Weathered Rock
1700 funnawav Rnad
47 / 52.5 Rock
Street Address
/
Semnra NC 27343
/
City or Town State Zip Code
/
John Tnetfer
/
Contact Name
/
410 S_ Wilminnton St_ PFR 4A
/
Mailing Address
/
Raleigh NC 27601
/
City or Town State Zip Code
919
: 12. REMARKS:
(546-7863
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
10 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 75A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 52'
RECO D HAS BEEN PROVIDEgTO THE WELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO IV:
. �,�Uh��►n���.
12-21-10SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 38.81 FT.
Thomas Whitehead
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
: PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30`da s.,of com letion to: DivWion of Water Quality Form
y p ry - Information Processing,:
Rev. 2/os
/09
1617"Maii Service Center;:Rafeigh, NC 27699-161,Phone-: (919)1074300

FaSTAIEo
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
S&ME. Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 SOrina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 i 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable)
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) CW-1
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring [( Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery O Injection Cl
Irrigation❑ Other p (list use)
DATE DRILLED_ 10-29-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley p(Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 " 26 ' 56.6000 " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 " 3 27.9900 " DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
Latitudefiongitude source: I3PS aopographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this forth if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Prnnress Fnerav Carniinac
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
1700 ntinrlawav Road
Street Address
Semora NC 27343
City or Town State Zip Code
.John Toetfer
Contact Name
410 S_ Wilminaton St_ PFR 4A
Mailing Address
Raleinh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919546-7863
Area code Phone number
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface -
*Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
e. YIELD (gpm):
METHOD OF TEST
f. DISINFECTION: Type
Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Top Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth
Diameter Weight Material
Top -2.14 Bottom 19.5
Ft. 2" sch 40 PVC
Top Bottom
Ft.
Top Bottom
Ft.
8. GROUT: Depth
Material Method
Top 0 Bottom_ Ft. Portland Pour
Top 8 Bottom 18
Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom
Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
:Top 19.95 Bottom 39.75Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
Top
Bottom
Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Size Material
: Top 18
Bottom 40.25
Ft. Coarse Sand
Top
Bottom
Ft.
Top
Bottom
Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /5
5 112
12 / 40.25
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
Rock
6. WELL DETAILS: I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 39.751 . RR ORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED THE WELL OWNER.
1 Vt.-�.Aa
V 12-21-10
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO qI SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 25.87 FT. :Thomas Whitehead
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Form 109
Y P .. ty - 9 Rev. 2I09
1617 MaiEService Centeri Raleigh, NC 276997161, Phone: [phone]

NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
SWE. Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Sr)dna Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface -
`Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
6. YIELD (gpm):
METHOD OF TEST
C DISINFECTION: Type
Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
: Top -2.28 Bottom 7.7
Ft. 2"
sch 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) : Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID #(Happlicable) CW-2 ;Top Bottom Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring ti;( Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED 10-29-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community. Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (cheek appropriate box)
❑Slope []Valley VFIat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 ° 26 42.3000 " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 ° 4 35.9300 " DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
Latitude/longitude source: 03PS i]ropographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Pmaress Fnerav Cnrnlinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
1700 Minnnwav gnarl
Street Address
Semore N 734�
City or Town State Zip Code
John Tnetfer
Contact Name
410 S_ Wilminntnn St PFR 4A
Mailing Address
Raleinh NC 276n1
City or Town State Zip Code
(919546-7863
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 17.51
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO C�
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom 4.5 Ft. Portland Pour
Top 4.5 Bottom 6.5 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 7.7 Bottom 17.5 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in
Top Bottom Ft. in
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size
Top 6.5 Bottom 18 Ft. Goars
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /2
2 /18
12. REMARKS:
in.
in.
Material
Sand
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RE RD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
�� 12-21-1 a
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRA C OR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 13.77 FT. Thomas Whitehead
(Use °+" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit.within 30 days -of com letion'to: Division of Water Quality Form Gw 1b
P iity - information Processing, Rev. 2ro9
1617, Malm6rvice Center, Ralelgh, NC 27699-161 Phone: [phone]

NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
•��.• WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
S&ME. Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Sorina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable)
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) CW-2D
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring t( Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED-1 0-28-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate bold
❑Slope ❑Valley Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 ° 28 ' 42.2500 " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 ° 4 35.8600 .. DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LatitudeAongitude source: W3PS Dropographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andaffached to
this form if not using GPS)
S. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Pr inress Fnernv Carolinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
1700 Punnawav Roars
Street Address
Semora NC 27343
City or Town State Zip Code
.Inhn Tnetfer
Contact Name
410 S_ Wilminntnn St_ PFR 4A
Mailing Address
Rsleinh NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
(919546-7863
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 29.9'
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO I/
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface*
*Top of casing terminated attor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
a. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST_
f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth)
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING:
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top -2.26 Bottom 25.1 Ft. 2 sch 40 PVC
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
• 8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom_ Ft. Portland Pour
Top 8 Bottom 22.7 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft_
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 25.1 Bottom 29.9 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 22.7 Bottom 30.4 Ft. Coarse Sand
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /_ 5
5/_ 22
2 / 30.4
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
Rock
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RE =DHAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
12-21-1 C
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 13.78 FT. Thomas Whitehead
(Use'+' if Above Top of Casing) = PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
FormSubmit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality!. Irlformadon Processing, Rev. /09
y p � ' 9 Rev. 2/09
1617 Mail Service Center,, Raleigh, NC 27699-161, Phone : [phone]

NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
SWE, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Sorina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERM
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
: e. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST_
f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Top Bottom Top Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Weight Material
Top -2.34 Bottom 3.4 Ft. 2" sch 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(1 applicable) : Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) CW-3 : Top Bottom Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring Cif' MunicipaVPublic p
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation[] Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED 10-26-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC I LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
[]Slope []Valley p(Flat []Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 ° 28 ' 1.2700 " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 ° 4 37.6200 DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
Latitudellongitude source: W3PS []Topographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andettached to
this form if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well Is located.)
Prnnress Fnarnv Carolinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
_1700 Dunnaway Rnad
Street Address
Semora NC 27343
City or Town State Zip Code
John Tnetfer
Contact Name
410 S. Wilminntfln St. PFR 4A
Mailing Address
Raleiah NC 27601
City or Town State Zip Code
f 9198 546-7863
Area code Phone number
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom 2 Ft. Portland Pour
Top 2 Bottom 3 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Topes 4 Bottom 11.4 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. -in. in.
10. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 3 Bottom 11.4 Ft. Coarse Sand
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /2
_2 / _11.4
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
6. WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 11.4' : RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
�
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES [INO W L-,v1,, /) 1A -V A-0.4 A 12-21-10 : SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 5.25 FT. Thomas Whitehead
(Use'+' if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Rev. 2109 Processing, Form b
09
1617 Mail Service Center,; Raleigh,' NC 27699461, Phone :,[phone]

NON RESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
S&ME, Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Spdna Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9f 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(it applicable)
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) CW-3D
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring al Municipal/Public ❑
IndustriallCommercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED 1 0-29-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Streel Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 "28 ' 1.28M " DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 ^ 4 37.7100 " DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
Latitudellongitude source: W.PS Oropographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
PrnnrPss FnPrav Carnlinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
1700 ni innawav Rnad
Street Address
Semnra NC 27343
City or Town State Zip Code
John TnPtfPr
Contact Name
410 S_ Wilminnton St. PFR 4A
Mailing Address
RalPinh NC 27ROl
City or Town State Zip Code
(919546-7863
Area code Phone number
6. WELL DETAILS:
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 46.5'
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated atfor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
: e. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST.
f. DISINFECTION: Type Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth)
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING:
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top -2.38 Bottom 41.7 Ft. 2" sch 40 PVC
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottoms_ Ft. Portland Pour
Top 31 Bottom_32_ Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 41.7 Bottom 46.5 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top 39 Bottoms Ft. Coarse Sand
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /.5
/12
12 / 47
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
Rock
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
SIGNATURE UR OF CERTIFIED WELL ACTOR 12 ATE 1 O
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 3.63 FT. Thomas Whitehead
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Form 109 b
Y P tY - 9 Rev. z/os
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh, NC 27699-161,,Phone [phone]

° r�4
NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
•tea; �•Id WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Thomas Whitehe
Well Contractor (individual) Name
S&ME. Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Sprina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9( 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2-5 FT. Above Land Surface'
'Top of casing terminated atfor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
e. YIELD (gpm):
METHOD OF TEST
f. DISINFECTION: Type
Amount
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
: Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
7. CASING: Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top -2.22 Bottom 24.2
Ft. 2"
sch 40 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) : Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) C W-4 : Top Bottom Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring W Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation[] Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED 1 1-1-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley Flat ❑Ridge ❑Other
LATITUDE 36 "27 49.7300 • DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 • 4 ' 21.9800 " DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DO
Latitudellongitude source: (SPS aopographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USG topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Pmaress Fnerav Carolinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
170n niannawav Road
Street Address
Semora NC 27343
City or Town State Zip Code
Jr)hn Tnetfer
Contact Name
_410 S_ Wilminaton St_ PFR 4A
Mailing Address
Raleiah NC 27801
City or Town State Zip Code
(919_546-7863
Area code Phone number
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom 8 Ft. Portland Pour
Top 8 Bottoms_ Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 24.2 Bottom 39 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. In. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top­22_Bottom 39.5 Ft. Coarse Sand
Top Bottom Ft.
Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom Formation Description
0 /6
6 / 26
26 / 39.5
12. REMARKS:
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
Rock
6. WELL DETAILS: : I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 39' REECCnRDHAS
^BEEN PROVIDED TOJ'THE WELL OWNER.
IL
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO I� " """ ""�" 1 Al �'�'� 12-21-10
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 28.97 FT. : Thomas Whitehead
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing) : PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within30 days of completion to: Division of Water Quality Infotmat on Processing, Form GW-t b
y.., P tY " 9 Rev. 2/09
1617 Mail Service Center,, Raleigh, NC 27699-161 Phone : [phone]

NONRESIDENTIAL WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 2907
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Tomas Whitehead
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
SWE. Inc.
Well Contractor Company Name
3201 Snrina Forest Road
Street Address
Raleiah NC 27616
City or Town State Zip Code
9r 19 ) 872-2660
Area code Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT#
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2.5 FT. Above Land Surface -
•Top of casing terminated atlor below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
: e. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST,
C DISINFECTION: Type Amount
: g. WATER ZONES (depth):
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
:Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Thickness/
: 7. CASING:
Depth
Diameter
Weight Material
Top -211
Bottom 4.7
Ft. 2"
sch 4 PVC
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT#(if applicable) Top Bottom Ft.
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) CW-5 Top Bottom Ft.
3. WELL USE (Check One Box) Monitoring 3( Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial ❑ Agricultural ❑ Recovery ❑ Injection ❑
Irrigation❑ Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED 11-3-10
4. WELL LOCATION:
1700 Dunnawav Road
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
CITY: Semora COUNTY Person
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING: (check appropriate box)
❑Slope ❑Valley elat ❑Ridge []Other
LATITUDE 36 ° 28 •42.0400 • DMS OR 3X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LONGITUDE 79 ° 4 • 24.9400 ° DMS OR 7X.XXXXXXXXX DD
LatitWe/Iongitude source: JX3PS OTopographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map andattached to
this form if not using GPS)
5. FACILITY (Name of the business where the well is located.)
Prnrtress Enemv C:amlinas
Facility Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
17(10 iunnawav Rnad
Street Address
Semnra NC 27341
City or Town State Zip Code
John TnPtfer
Contact Name
410 S_ Wilminnton St_ PER 4A
Mailing Address
Raleiah NI^ 97601
City or Town State Zip Code
( 919546-7863
Area code Phone number
8. GROUT: Depth Material Method
Top 0 Bottom 2 Ft. Portland Pour
Top 2 Bottom 3.5 Ft. Bentonite Pour
Top Bottom Ft.
9. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
Top 4.7 Bottom 19.5 Ft. 2 in. .010 in. PVC
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
Top Bottom Ft. in. in.
10. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Top_3.5 Bottom 20 Ft. Coarse Sand
Top Bottom Ft.
: Top Bottom Ft.
11. DRILLING LOG
Top Bottom
0 /3
_3_/ 21.9
12. REMARKS:
Formation Description
Sandy Clay
Weathered Rock
6. WELL DETAILS: : 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
• 75A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
a. TOTAL DEPTH: 19.5r RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDEEDD)TQO THE64 ELL OWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO [/ (+P oV a n '"" 11OAA 12-21-10
SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL CONTRACTOR DATE
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: 9_92 FT. Thomas Whitehead
(Use •+° if Above Top of Casing) :'PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit within 30 days.of completion to: Division of Water Quality Information Processing, Form GW-1b
Rev. 2/09
_1617 Maili$ervice Center„Ralelgh, NC 27699,461„Phone :' [phone]

G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc.
425 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27003
(9191828-0677
PROJECT NAME: CP&L Roxboro
LOCATION: Roxboro, NC
i DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AR
FIELD PARTY: NA
GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg
DATE BEGUN. 3/14/02 COMPLETED: 3/14/02
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-6 Page 1 of 2
TOTAL DEPTH: 4.5
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA
STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS)
Depth (ft)
37
27.5
Time
3:00
5:00
Date
3114/02
3/14102
z
r
o
'�
°
Z)
0
z
L7
w
Q
O
Lu
p
m
¢
DESCRIPTION
Iz
In
a
0.0
1.0
2.0
3,0
4.0
5.0
0.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
16.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0 -
30.0
31.0
32,0 -
33.0 -
qA n -
10,16,23,23
10,23,30,50/5
SS
SS
HSA
SANITY SILT: Orange, brawn and light tan sandy silt,
dry
� -
77
77
-77
77
-77
77
.
SILT: Olive, orange, pink and white silt to clay with
mica. PWR-
5015"
SS
=
77-77.
5015"
SS77.
5015"
SS
SILTY SAND: Olive brown slightly weathered silty
sand, dry-
T T
=-r,"
TT;
T
r.
• T'T
7
.-
SDIO'
S.S.
+ -r-
T. r..
T -r
T T ,
Y T.
r 7
T.
T T
� T
T
r
T T. .
T
TT
'Tr
0+0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15+0
16.0
1TO
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22+0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
W n

G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc.
` 426 North Boylan Avenue. Raleigh NC 27603
181" 828-0577
PROJECT NAME: Cp&L Roxboro
LOCATION: Roxboro, NC
DRILLING CO-. Richard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AH
FIELD PARTY: NA
GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg
DATE BEGUN: 3114102 COMPLETED: 3/14/02
F- x 0
z 3:
z }
� QCL
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-S Page 2 of 2
TOTAL DEPTH: 45
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION; NA
STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS)
Repth (ft)
37
27.5
Time
3:00
5:00
Date
3114/02
3114/02
❑ J
o DESCRIPTION
35.0
SILTY SAND: Olive brown slightly weathered silty
' . Tr
~� V
'5010
SS
sand, d1Y• Moisture noted at 45 feet. Boring
�r y
35.0
39"0
terminated.
TTT
+.
36.0
37.0
T
:+-r;
37.0
38.0
+—r-;
TT"
38,0
39.0
T.
39.0
40.0
5010
SS
mT.
TT"
:+_
40.0
41.0
T"r,
TT
41.0
42.0
r. +T
i
42.0
43.0
TT'
43.0
44.0
r
T T
44.0
45.0
Tm
45.0

Above —Crude Protec
Locked Steel Casing
Concrete Pod
Cement Grout
0' — 26'
7.
Bentonite Seal
26' - 28'
Sand Filter Pacts
28' -- 45'
1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT.
A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured
by Monoflex was installed with the pump
screen at the midpoint of the well screen.
2. AQUIFER TESTING,
Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb
& Associates, P.A., yielded an average
hydraulic conductivity =10.9 feet/day.
3. SURVEY.
Well location, including ground and top of
casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors.
Pump wellhead
3 ft. Stickup
Ground Surface
5.25" Diameter Bore Hole
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
Interval: 0' — 30'
Top of Screen
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
0.010" Slot Size
Screen Interval. 30 — 45'
69 Bottom of Well Point. 45'
ME. ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL
Gary. Ahlb@Cg, P.E. MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION
201 N, Front Street, Suite 706
Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Phone:[phone] Dunnaway Road
$emora, NC 27343
MW N& SCAM PWACTM
GMW-6 not to PEC--t
wale
Cara Bn I M** gr "IM
GWA GWA 5/14/02

PROJECT:
PROJECT #:
BABB AND ASSOCIATES, R.A.
Raleigh, North Carolina
SOIL. BORING LOG
Roxboro Ash Monofill
BORING ID: GMW -7 Replacement
Date: 6128110
Method: Air Rotary
Contractor: Quantex, Inc.
Page:
1 of 1
Total Depth:
54 feet
Boring ❑ia:
6 inches
Field Rep:
G. ,Babb
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description
Blow
Count
Field
Screen
Notes
A
2' - 4'
Brown fine sandy LOAM
B
6'
Brown fine sandy LOAM
C
8' - 10'
Brown silty fine SAND with rack (rags
D
15' - 16'
Tan quartz -rich felsic rock
E
28' - 33'
Tan quartz -rick felsic rock - weathered
F
38' - 40'
Tan felsic granitic rock wl mafic inclusions
G
44'
Possible water - no return
H
48' - 53'
Felsic granitic rack wl mafic gneiss
54'
Well set at 54' below grade
Comments: Water level at 25.5' below grade at time of drilling.

Above -Grade
Concrete Pod
PAID
ro
Babb & Associates, P.A.
,king Well Cap
2.5' Stickup
Ground Surface
6.25" Diameter Bare Hole
Cement Grout
0' - 37' 'r' �. -, 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
�. .;.: Interval: +2.5' - 39'
Bentonite Seal -
37' - 39' - - -
Top of Screen
1�'
Sond Filter Pack 2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
39' - 54' 0.010" Slot Size
Screen Interval: 39' - 54'
Bottom of Well Point: 54'
GMW — 7
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION
Progress Energy Ash Monofill
Dunnaway Road
Roxboro, Norfh Carolina
nGwr NO.
SCALE.'
FRWd'C7 W.
not is
scale
MCKM BY:
MAWN BY.
OATS•
G. Babb
6/28/10

L .t G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc.
425 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603
[phone]
PROJECT NAME: CP&L Roxboro
LOCATION: Roxboro, NC
DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AH
FIELD PARTY: NA
GEOLOGIST` Logger: Ahlberg
DATE BEGUN: 3113/02 COMPLETED: 3/14102
� X 0
0Lu
iu
F-
ca z
o
0.4
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
90
10.0
11.0
12,0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
1&0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
i 30.0
31.0
32. ❑
33"0
'An n
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-8 Page 1 of 2
TOTAL DEPTH: 65
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA
STATIC WATER LEVEL {BLS}
Depth (ft)
58
43.6
Time
3.00
3/14/02
Date
3/13/02
3:00
0 1
L DESCRIPTION
AR
SILTY SAND: Tan silty sand - gneissic partially
-r T
weathered rock.
T r "
..r..r_ .
. r r%
7,18,26,38
SS
' T
7.
T.'
.T.T.
T
t..
T.
7 Y.
r 7
T.'
TT
r,
7,17,25,36
SS
..r.-r.
..rr.
�rT
T.'
.y..r.
-r"
rT
r.
rT
8.12,25,50/5
SS
rrT
'r'
T.
,
rT.
TT
r
T
T. r
T
T.'
5010.5m
SS
_rr
�rT
r.
AH
GNEISS: Tan gneiss. No frachires noted.
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5,0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
1&0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.0
1An n
z
0

G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc.
426 North Boylan Avenge, Raleigh NC 27603
(9191828-0577
PROJECT NAME: CP&L Roxboro
LOCATION: Roxboro, NC
DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AH
FIELD PARTY: NA
GEOLOGIST: Cogger: Ahlberg
RATE BEGUN: 3/13/02 COMPLETED: 3/14/02
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-8 Page 2 of 2
TOTAL, DEPTH: 55
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA
STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS)
Depth (ft)
58
43.6
Time
3:00
3114102
Date
3/13/02
3:00
F-
2
0
z
o
Ll
w
w
o
Q
g
w
uUt
DESCRIPTION
w
❑
m
ac
❑
x
35.0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
51.0
52.0
53,0
54.0
55.0
56.0
57.0
58.0
59.0
60.0
61.0
62.0
63.0
64.0
65.0
35.0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
40.0
41.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
48.0
49.0
50.0
51.0
52.0
53.0
54.0
55.0
56.0
57.0
68.0
59.0
60.0
61.0
62.0
63.0
64.0
65.0

Above —Grade Protec
Locked Steel Casing
Concrete Pod
Cement Grout
G' — 49'
Bentonite Seal
49, — 51
Sand Filter Pack
51' — 63,
1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT.
A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured
by Monoflex was installed with the pump
screen at the midpoint of the well screen.
2. AQUIFER TESTING.
Aquifer testing performed on the well by Rabb
& Asssociates, F.A., yielded a hydraulic
conductivity = 2.14 feet/day.
3. SURVEY.
Well location, including ground and top of
casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors.
mp wellhead
3 ft. Stickup
Ground Surface
5.25" Diameter Sore Hole
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
Interval: G' — 53'
Top of Screen
2.0" diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
0.010" Slot Sire
Screen Interval: 53' — 63'
Bottom of Well Point: 63'
Rag. ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL
Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E.
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION
201 N. Front Street, Suite 706
Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Phone:[phone]M 1700 Dunnoway Road
Semora, NC 27343
') I
FARW Alar
smm
raaffa war
GMW_8
not
scalee
PEC—.
cherCov M
MOW Br:
MM
GwA
GWA
3/14/02

G. N. Richardson & Associates, Inc.
` 426 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh NC 27603
[phone]
PROJECT NAME: CP&L Roxboro
LOCATION- Roxboro, NC
DRILLING CO: Richard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AH
FIELD PARTY: NA
GEOLOGIST: Lugger: Ahlberg
DATE BEGUN: 3/13/02 COMPLETED: 3113102
r p
T
v i
J �♦
W O U =a
0. 0
1.0
2.❑
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
&0
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13,0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21.0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26,0
27.0 -
28.0 -
29.0
30.0 .
31.0
32.0 -
33.0 -
1A n -
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBED GMW-9 Page 1 of 2
TOTAL DEPTH: 45
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: NA
STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS)
Depth (ft)
27.80
27.78
Time
11:00
3114102
Date
3/13/02
11:00
LU q DESCRIPTION
N
AH
SAND. Tan fine sand, dry. •,
5015"
SS
• •
5011"
ss
GNEISS: Dark tan gneiss, Fracture at 13 - 14 feet.
GNEISS: Dark gray gneiss
QUARTZ: Quartz seam V
GNEISS: Dark gray haraeblende gneiss. Fractures at
35-36 feet and 42 - 43 feet.
0.0
1.0
2.o
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.❑
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
19.0
20.0
21,0
22.0
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
30.0
31.0
32.0
33.❑
7n n

ssociates, Inc.
G. N. Richardson & A
` 425 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh IBC 27603
[phone]
PROJECT NAME: CP&L Roxboro
LOCATION: Roxboro, NC
DRILLING CO: Rkbard Simmons Drilling
DRILLING METHOD: AR
FIELD PARTY_ NA
GEOLOGIST: Logger: Ahlberg
DATE BEGUN: 3113102 COMPLETED: 3113/02
FIELD BOREHOLE LOG
BOREHOLE NUMBER GMW-9 Page 2 of 2
TOTAL DEPTH; 45
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION: NA
TOP OF CASING ELEVATION: Ns
STATIC WATER LEVEL (BLS)
Depth {ft)
27.80
27.78
Time
11:00
3114/02
Date
3/13/02
11:00
D
O
}
a
zi
0
0
—'
o
m
w
a
DESCRIPTION
g
a
w
35.0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39.0
40.0
41.D
42.0
' 43.0
44.0
45.0
35,0
36.0
37.0
38.0
39. ❑
40.0
41.0
42.0
43.0
44.0
45.0

Above —Grade Protec
Locked Steel Casing
Concrete Pod
Cement Grout
0' — 26'
Bentonite Seal
26' — 28'
Sand Filter Pack
28' — 45'
1. DEMCATEU SAMPLING EQUIPMENT.
A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured
by Mcnoflex was installed with the pump
screen ❑t the midpoint of the well screen.
2. AQUIFER TESTING.
Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb
& Asssociates, P.A., yielded an average
hydraulic conductivity = 77.05 feet day.
3. SURVEY.
Well location, including ground and top of
casing elevotions surveyed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors.
mp wellhead
3 ft. Stickup
Ground Surface
5.25" Diameter Bore Hole
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
Interval: 0' — 30'
Top of Screen
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
0.010" Slat Size
Screen Interval: 30' — 45'
Bottom of Well Point. 45'
Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. ' ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL FXVW W.
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GM►N-9
201 N. Front Street, Suite 70fi
Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carollnas, Inc. Fa err
Phone: 910,362.9800 1700 Dunnaway Road
Sennora, NC 27343 GWA
FAVArr ►M
not to PEA-1
scale
GWA 3f14/02

PROJECT:
PROJECT #:
BORING ID:
Date:
Method:
Contractor:
GARY W. AHLBERG, P.E.
Wilmington, North Carolina
SOIL BORING LOG
Roxboro Ash Landfill
LAM
GM W-10
9125102
NSA -AIR
Richard Simmons ❑n:11hrg Co.
Page:
7 of 1
Total Depth:
45 feet
Boring Dia:
5.25 inches
Field Rep:
GWA
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description
Blow
Count
Field
Screen
Notes
A
0' - 5'
SM: tan -brown silty sand dry p. weathered rock
50/4"
B
5'-12'
SM: tan -brown silty sand dry p. weathered rock
5015,
12' - 13'
SM: gray dry softer pwr
D
13'-20'
SM: tan dry hard pwr
5a11.5"
E
20' - 27'
SM: olive -tan dry mod. hard pwr
5010
27'
auger refusal, change to air hammer drilling
dark gray homblende gneiss
32'
apparent fracture zone, no moisture observed
45'
moderate water show
complete well with 15-ft screen (30-45)
sand to up to 28', seal and grout to surface
Comments:

Above —Grade Protec
Looked Steel Casing
Concrete Pad
Cement Grout
0' -- 26'
Sentonite Seal -
26' — 28'
Sand Filter Pack
28' — 45'
1. DEDQTED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT.
A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured
by Monoflex was installed with the pump
screen at the midpoint of the well screen.
2. AQUIFER TESTING.
Aquifer testing performed on the well by Babb
& Asssociotes, P.A., yielded on average
hydraulic conductivity = 5.32 feet/day.
3. SURVEY.
Well location, including ground and tap of
casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors.
Pump wellhead
3 ft. Stickup
Ground Surface
5.25" Diameter Bore Hole
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
Interval: 0' — 30'
Top of Screen
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
0.010" Slot Size
Screen Interval: 30' — 45'
Bottom of Well Point: 45'
Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. nm ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION
201 N. Front Street, Suite 706
Wilmington, NC 2MI Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Phone: [phone] Dunnoway Road
Semora, NC 27343
MW ►ter rAvr-Tr Mao-
GMW— IO not to
PEC-s
scale
q�rra er:• aeerry �: aenn
GWA GWA 9�25/D2

GARY W. AHLBERG, P.E.
Wilmington, North Carolina
SOIL BORING LOG
PROJECT:
Roxboro Ash Landfill
PROJECT #:
LAM
BODING ID:
GMW-11
Page:
9 of 7
Date:
9126102
Total Depth:
45 feet
Method:
HSA-AIR
Boring DA
5.25 inches
Contractor: Richard Simmons Drilling Co.
Field Rep;
GWA
Sampla
Depth Description
Blow
Field Notes
Number
Interval
Count
Screen
0' - 3' MIL: reddish brown silty clay residual soils
A
3'-5' MIL: orange brown silty sandy clay residual soils
4-8-8-9
B
5'-13' ML: orange brown - olive green silty sandy clay
6-11-13-13
13'-16.5' SW: olive green hard drilling weathered rock
15.5' auger refusal, change to air hammer drilling
dark greenish gray gneiss
3o' apparent fracture, slight moisture
20 min. = 2 in water return
35, hard lease - dry
45' TD 30 min = 3 ft wter return
complete well with 15-ft screen (30-45)
sand to up to 28', seal and grout to surface
Comments:

Above -Grade Protec
Locked SLeel Casing
Concrete Pad
Cement Grout
0' -- 26'
Bentonite Seal
2s' - 28'
Sand Filter Pack
28' - 45'
1. DEDICATED SAMPLING EQUIPMENT.
A stainless steel bladder pump manufactured
by Monoflex was installed with the pump
screen at the midpoint of the well screen.
2. AQUIFER TESTING.
Aquifer testing performed an the well by Babb
& Asssociates, P.A., yielded a hydraulic
conductivity = 2.07 feet/doy.
3. SURVEY.
Well location, including ground and top of
casing elevations surveyed by Smith & Smith
Surveyors.
Pump wellhead
3 ft. Stickup
Ground Surface
5.25" Diameter Bore Hole
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Riser
Interval: 0' - 30'
Top of Screen
2.0" Diameter Schedule 40 PVC Screen
0.010" Slot Size
Screen Interval: 3D' - 45'
Bottom of Well Point- 45'
Gary W. Ahlberg, P.E. "' ROXBORO ASH LANDFILL
201 N, Front Street, Suite 706 MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION GMW-11
Wilmington, NC 28401 Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. CWGKEa or
Phone: [phone]$00 1700 Dannaway Road
Semora, NC 27343 GWA
SCAit-, pma*cr Iva
not to PEC-'
scale
aw#nv ar: wnu
GWA 9/26/02

FROM : P)SD CRRUL I NRS PHONE NO. : 704 662 06 743 Rpr. 02 2002 12! 21PN P5
North (laralina . t7epaftmenf of Environment and NatVral Resaur069 DMC� on oT VVVtW 4u21ity - Grwridwater SMW
1636 wol $ervine ConIM - R-gWgh. N0 278"-1036 Phone [phone]
WELL. CONSM MORD WELL CONTRACTOR. � Slmrrsone rJ
^� / WELL CONTRACTOR CARTIFICATION1t M
wolf htuthftation #: Uw � M �— BTATI= WELL CON $7U=ON PEAN14T 07
1. WELL LOCATION: j8h6%y sketch 01 Ift INAiM WOW)
Nearest TWM $ Q Coijwy Em
G
nRa►A•o4t esedd.IanIa4NR�d
2 OWNER- CP&f_
ADDRM&
tshrwYo+� �� s� r�aod —
3. DATE DH{ 20; 5FT310T
J. TOTAL DEDTH: +4&
8. DOES WELLREPLACE EXISTING WEU.? No
7, 8TATIG WATER LEVEL 9010w -Top of GwMg:
(Lb-wlAbwwT&PaPL ift
8. TQP OF CASINO 10 2± FT. Aboas Land $urlava
• cw"Yeuiaa5 few ly &W velM ■rrrW+o^ n
rah:H wwvD kw WR-QA W.Ac 2C pile
Q. YIF1.1'] (gprn): METHOD OF TEST; ..
10- WATER Z,ON66 (doctor):
!t CHLORINATION Typo of -A AriWnt' _-- -
12 CASING'.
WaR ThIckAws
L,oWh DisrMAW orw6lghw- Nlsoe"
gPTH DRiLLING LOG
FNen To FWTra>ar+ Devon lbn
tl wmtk)nd spies is n06aetl uea bu*tf WM
Front
To
3D Ft.
T' Wh 40 PVC -
(Erma dree,oatr madaemnoa seem at ftm M -;An
��
Fran
Ft
Rovgn, or 00wrow Fdwe%a M}
FMM
Tn
— - _ rt
I& GROUT:
0%ffl1
M*rkd Method
FMM O
TO
243 FI.
CBIn"Rentands nmmkt
From
T4
fr4--
seas
1d- SCREE:i'
Depth
Dlan er' SkAstae" wwww
From - ---
Tp
dS FL
r .01D PV
From
-rD
rt
Sae
15. SAMIdRAVEL. PACK:
Road 13MQ
1]epih
Skn mao i91
Frvn 28
To
CFI.
42 Sand
From
To
Ft
W. _
16. REMARKS:
RGxB]R0
I eo HE EUY"RTIFY THAT YffiU. AM CONIFRUX71W aN AWORDAMe YvrrH 14A NGC li , W@LL COpSMOTIQN
9TAHDl1MW AW
MA'rA 00PY tV THS MCORD WS MR PAVMW 10
We VAF14 vw71FR
Ali=
�i t7F CTUR AG "HT F�T� - --
SWr>Wdndsntikliv 0 Er„ir*YMFW UW40"u and mPy b w Dw

a.
' NON -REtJcvt' SIDENTIAL WEIJ. CON�t ION RECORD
Narth Cara>lina Ik-Imi ment of }:n%ir-nnme-to and N-Mmol Resourves- Division of Watcr Qo alil}
WEI.l. C'ONTRA(70111 ('ERTIFI('A'!'I{]N k3468 A
1. WELL CONTRACTOR.
Stephen W. Keener _
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
❑uantex, Inc.
Watt Contractor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS P.O. Box 41673
Raleigh, NC 27629
City or Town state L1p Code
(919_)_ 219-9604 !�
Area cede- Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION: `r]
SITE WELL ID #(d aapp*able) " _ w - 7
WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMITNN,(elrpGcabtrr) NA
OTHER ASSOCIATED PERMIT a(if applicable) NA
3. WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring Municipaypublico
InduslriallCommer6aEl AgriculturaIC Recoveryll InjectionEl
Irrigalloril Olherp (list use)
DATE DRILLED June 28, 2010 _
TIME COMPLETED 2:30 pm AMO PMI[
4. WELL LOCATION;
CITY Roxboro COUNTY Person
1 unnaway oaa _ 27343
l5treei Name, Numters. Community Subfrr•aion La1 No Perc-N. Zip Cade)
TOPOGRAPHIC 1 LAND SETTING
W Slope D Val#ey 0 Flat 0 Ridge 11 Other,
lcheo appropriate DOII
Ala} lx la drKerr.
LATITUDE N 36.470131 minute+. w.,,uJ or
LONGITUDE W 79.053583 In .r 1IC, 1(11.11 ti nrrlltt
Latiludell t ingi tude Source: i (i IIS 0 'I o[mg.raphic map
(location of well must be shown ❑n a USGS ropo ni p and
affached to this form if fuN usurq GPS)
5. FACILITY• nw ,vs,w,�a w ww3s .nNa t,, • .w •,. .: n,
FACILITY ID #(it appilcablel. NA
NAME OF FACILITY_ Progress Ever- y-- --
STREET ADDRESS 1700 ❑unnaway Road
Roxboro_ 27343
Roxboro—-
_NC
City or Town State _
Zip Code
CONTACT PERSON, -.
MAILING ADDRESS
City or Town State
Zip Code
Area code • Phone number
S. WELL DETAILS;
A
a- TOTAL DEPTH-._
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL?
Yf-Sl r NOO
c. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing �
5, FT
(Use '+" if Alcove Top of Casrngl
d. TOP OF CASING IS 2; 5' FT Above Lana) Sutlace'
'Top of easing terminated aVor glow land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .6118
e. YIELD (9pm) NA_ METHOD OF TEST NA _
I DISINFECTION: Type NA Amount NA
g. WATER ZONES (depthr
From " To a From To
From To From To
From To From Ta
7. CASING: Depth Diameter Thackness+raeaghl Malenat
From C To �_ Ft 2" sch40 PVC
From To V1
r rom� _W_.__. To---- F1
9. GROUT
Depth
Material Method
From
To • : :'
Ft.Neat Gement Pour
From _ram' _ To . '. ;�
F! 9fl�tonlle 8CB ^--
From
To
Ft
9. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
F mm--j ;_T
io_�' _
Ft 2" in. 0.010 in PVC
Y �
From
— To —_
Ft i n _ in
I torn—�
To
Ft n. In
10. SANDIGRAVEL
PACK:
Depth
Size Material
From
To 0
F1. i#2 Silica Sand 4_
From
Ta_ --TT
Ft
f-rornTa
FI
11-DRILLING LOG
Frgrn To Formalion Description
--
12, REMARKS:
I W IiXRUHr I.I RTa1 r Irr?r irk$ Dillri 'NAS irmN$TRiXtt;FitN AC. i,00DAM' F WT7ki
'SA Nt1A,C Al ok&I l C. OFIJ I fZ1 JC TICrN S, IANRAK)I AM) III&T A COPY OF THIS
P?1, IN 17 tlM 01n4Var15 r, Tirk ryr ,1 rwdI n
1 T
31GNAT1/ F OF CFRTIFIED WF(-I. CONTRACTOR DATE
Stephen W- Keener i5 INTED rJAME QF PER 0N—CON_ S T R U C T I N G THE WELL
Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn. Information Mgt., Fo,R, GW- rq
1617 Mail Service Center— Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone No. [phone]ex1 568. Rev 12r137

F RUN : RSO CAROL I NAS PHONE NO. : 724 662 U; 670 Apr. 02 2002 12: 2t0PM P3
North 0Molina - Department of Entironment and NsluFel Resoureao Riv sa un of Water Quality- Grpur er 9adion
1639 M991$ev+C* CsnWt - Ralolgh, td4: 27699LI6W Phone [phone]
WU�L QD f�$3MgRgH M&ORP WFILCONTRACTOR'
WFU_ CONT RACTOR Ct=RTIFICATIONV 29a3
w1w identification Ilk > fYl Ll] 18 STATE Wn.LCONSTLIGTION PERMIT I@:
1_ WELL LOCATION: (t3tF�ly stealth of the fuCa{ion belv+ti+y
Nearest Tam; ReAgM CoUntY Person
Ceffv _-_
iRoed.Ctrraradgr. w8u6k"f wd1A
Z OWNER: CP&L
ADDRM:
rat er rm" 91w 4c4i
3. DATE DRILLED: YISlQ2
4. TOTAL DEPTH K
6. CUTTING 0OLLECTE01, _yam -
& DOES WELL REPLACE FJt]SnNG WELL? No
7. STATIC WArFR LEVEL Hdaw -Top of Casing:
NwWIfAbor4Toil #FQW ]
TOP OF CASING 18 FT. Ahm a land Suftatd
' CalYp laradmb7eWrt�vkri red•cfkiKslv+M�.rri.uh
IinAdYa.6[vld� y111S4 irrsAo ma �rAa
9. YIELD (gpmy METHOD OF TEST-
10- WATER ZONES (depth):
t1. C:FWRINATlONType- Eft AMmult
12- CA61N'&-
❑EPTH
Plan TO vwmmion uascmmn
N xd&OnW 6pow 1a nobdad Icm hxk of WrA
WO Tbk*X 0ss
Drplh Diameter or We]ghm Helena] LQG6jclON.6Nmh
From 0 To 91- F't. r 21 Sch 40_ FVL` (Shaw dfrs A n BW =MrWatrwn d tarsi two MW
Prom Ft Rom6, W c"r map rmwwgo pdrftl
From To —vt T
I& GROUT!
Do*
Mgkxbl Method
From 0
T'o
�! 1 Ft.
CernsrVlJeiAcn to trummie
Fmm
To
�
F1,
_
14. SCREEN:
Dwh
Olarnet" w Sim ` Ideriaf
Fmm M
To
0 Ft
21 M PVC:
From
To
Ft
--
Prflrtr -
To
F1
•• _HWY \917
1G BANDKIRAVD, PACK
Depth
stm HaEarial
From 61
Tn
02 3tYAf*
From —
T4
—fil ,Ft-
171--
i$. REMARKS:
117P lo2RtWi 6RTIFYTRAT WrLUYAM1 QOMTRUQrRu wAGC4:DM Ce WTH 15A NcaC7,kyir lCONGTRUOT"
*TANQAROO, AM)
THATArd9YOFT1VAMX)OMU46W:ENFKOWIPFUTWH3YO LOYI Vi
RA7r8AR0
411 n
gJaMAYURIE OF c oR+ nrs _uxlt_— ---- —
W=1Dft7WbD%AW ne191441PftW JFIWWOVA WA copy k rcl vMW
I

FROM : RSD CAROLINAS PHONE N❑. : 704 662 0670 Apr. 02 2002 12:20PM P2
North Csrollna - t7epsrlment of Fnvlronmwd and Nalwal Reswnuft Olv1sion of Water Quality - Gmund+Mater SWIon
18M Moll SeMm Center - RNeigh. NC 276661656 Phunt: {810}73', =l
MML6 rcOMMUCHON R WELL CONTRACTOR:
WELL CONTRACTOR CEFtTIFgGATiONO 2M
WN rdimtlftuv&n tk C-.�m w--q STATE WELL CONS-rUMION PER? AT ilk
1. WELL LOCATION: t3how sk" Of fhe IWWOn belay}
New"'FWrn: AMOgg colow.. DEPTH DRILLING LM
Ceffe Prom IN FumkOn Daam"aiT
IftA mnn+iY.x6ve6WIa�pro Ull. e Q
ADDII;MS.S.'
Gy GrTmrl ft1m
tN C4*
3. DATE DRILLED: MUD
a. TOTAL CVTH- 41?
5- CUTTING (ULL1rCTEO:
_jw
6- DOES WELL REPLACE E)OSTiNG WELL?
Na
7. BTATI0 WATER LEVEL Below - Tup or 004ing:
V—w aAbm Tod 4fC P"
iL TOP OF CASING IS
2+ t; V Above Lmtd Suriaoe'
ruansr--d- ■SA tm HOAR 3V ,ptFB
1L YIELD (gpmy
METKOD OP TENT-
-
t9 WATER ZONES (depBt};
11. CHLORINATION TYMw
ph Amount
T1 CASING:
Wall Thk*rw"
DORIh
dsaM1Fdt4T
er W"t. Mtlfsrial
o To
0 Fl- 2'
- 40 _ PVC
Fmm
_
Ft
Fran Tp
FL
it GROUr:
Q111FAh
Materim
Method
F1ras1 0 TO
4 Fl- CtfT*nM3Mi0I*D
m1mle,
Frum TO
�
Ft,
_
U SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter"
Slut $-We'
Fmm TO
71
.¢10 PVG .
Pro� TO
.4�Ft-
....
Fm rn To
fl
IS- SAITWORAVELPACK-
[?epth
spa
motwu
Fhym 2s Tp
dIs Ft. 42
Lls" —
Preps Tv
151- -
-
1$. REMARKS:
it oedWr"amm Is reWw um *Kkof kxm
L.OGATIOAI SKETCH
iSf+oW dvucw'n ww dkimme ftm nS N*4 wimalme
FftD&. or ath it raaq Fntaroned pu t �I
t
I DD MRFOY ULFTVVY THAT V40A WA9 ❑O"ITi t Ct=Is Ano014PAHC@ ritTH t9A APAOWIL KEEL CON6TAVO ION
9rNK"D& ANO TFNT A oerY OF THIS RM A 0 "A 0 im M PRUVVED I[Y T}K<wvu V MtER
411_=
E 9f TOR 4 QATC
a.am 4*:w 10 D won or ?3>r4am.Kr1 Mwwwd i W -w b. 7 wn:r.

FROM : RSD CAROLINAS Pt-CNE NO. : 704 662 2678 Nov. 21 2002 18:39AM P11
Nom Carolina - ❑epwlrrJent o1 Emirexamenl and >•klturel Rasourrm IJWion of WoW ❑uaFly - Gsoundy4tar SOCOOft
16M MI Senate Canter - RaMgh, NO 27699.1636 Phimeo1g)-e33-322i
WftL CUNSTIN—OTMA-M&GELD WELL CONTRACTOk Of NO
WELT. CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATlG1+frA WAS
Well Idenli%s wl � GlAw-i0 STATE WELL CONSTUCTUN PERMIT 0-
4. WF1L I OCATION`. �Sh[rN Clra4ch of Urs IpcatiOA h6t4�)
Nearest Te wn: .@gam County. Aemon .
$8SAp8 _
�4 JJy r� *Ac$wm OCILASTiW — ~-
2. DWNEi7: CP L Rcxbcro Plant
ADDRE$S:1700 Dunr±aLL1Sy FWaLL
Mc
M•ft i T+pCodr
1_Yi201,01R13i;
4. TOTAL VEPTH:
5. CUTTING COLLECTED:-
$. PC#SWELL REPLACOEXISTINGWELl3 Flo
7. STATIC WATER LkVrrL Sslow -Top d C40-v
¢J6.10 VAb. Top ofc ao
& TOP OF CASING 1$ 2+ FT. Abme Lwid Surface'
4400IN AIM McAc 8c•PJ 19
U. YIELD (Wn):
AAETHOD ❑F TOT:
10. WPiiEFi xl+les tde):
--
44. LH#ARIHArK M Tyw
a+
Amwnt
12. CASINO:
W;11 Thk mess
Depth
Mynew
yr W07hM
MalerlM
From 0 TO
30 pl.
_ r
Sdh 40
PVG
From
Fl.
- -
-
From To
- Ft
M GROUT.
Depth
Material
LWhod
FrTxrr TO
Fron'I TO
MSCREEM:
ow
rim 30 To
IErom To
Fw' M To
15. SAN=RAVEL PACK: DMth
From _ �$ Tu
From To
lii
_FL
28
k.
45 Fl.
-
Ft-N.
FL
Dlovfte". sat Bide' nteteTw
2' .010 PVC
$tom MMM9I
#2 n Said
_ DEPTH _ pawme-=
From To �fommabn De*optrbn
N uddAJortx space la rreadtd ute bQpc of form
LQgATIOH hNjj_N
[srww dtreadon aid atHanao nem al lead tvry Sb&
RaTad6, yr olMer m>tR rorerflnev pc>�}
N
46. REMARM& ROMOR4
tDd"EeYCEfMN TMT VOU VM 00MMUCTRIJ IN ACOCHCA= M X 1 SA W_kt h^, WELL OW73 MDTM
WPANaAN M. AN Ti-µiA0GnW YIM k$C�afpSDttPt CEO TVTHg Iop LL�V3F�
�ln � _-� 101i510CZ
OrA&kluuli= of DATH
sr,emti vow In ❑uw nL�wa.w.�+er�..,l..,r cay. m.,.�P.w
lii
_FL
28
k.
45 Fl.
-
Ft-N.
FL
Dlovfte". sat Bide' nteteTw
2' .010 PVC
$tom MMM9I
#2 n Said
_ DEPTH _ pawme-=
From To �fommabn De*optrbn
N uddAJortx space la rreadtd ute bQpc of form
LQgATIOH hNjj_N
[srww dtreadon aid atHanao nem al lead tvry Sb&
RaTad6, yr olMer m>tR rorerflnev pc>�}
N
46. REMARM& ROMOR4
tDd"EeYCEfMN TMT VOU VM 00MMUCTRIJ IN ACOCHCA= M X 1 SA W_kt h^, WELL OW73 MDTM
WPANaAN M. AN Ti-µiA0GnW YIM k$C�afpSDttPt CEO TVTHg Iop LL�V3F�
�ln � _-� 101i510CZ
OrA&kluuli= of DATH
sr,emti vow In ❑uw nL�wa.w.�+er�..,l..,r cay. m.,.�P.w

1
FPIX? : RSD CAMLINAS F-IUP1±= NO. : 704 662 0673 NQv. 21 200-2. 10:3BAM P10
North Gwal" - Aepamnan1 of J_nwonmeat and Noural € mouccom Diosion of water Quality - Grotmdwaiar,5Mt on
1636 MaiI &WOO Cenler - Raielgh, NC V69916W Phone [phone]
VdEI L C li 4�'TIQN RECtyit WELL OONTRAOTOM RWWtd §fmmRit9a,PAJnlLaf N
WELLCONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION# ZM
Well ldrin"Odiurt m GPA W-11 STATE W Ei I GUNMOTION PERMT€' S.,
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show 3MWh of tha lo&vlen below)
NewramYoww $gigrQ County PeNon
Saner
[kb-x Oww",a&bdYAi—wW Let NO!•]
2.OWNEM aL Marl
NG ZT.l4_3
LR/aa w! sma -7m Code
* WE DRILLED: 1 oz
* TOTAL DEFY 1: 4V
6_ CUTTIM! GOLLE D: xm
0. OE]ES WELL REPLAcE Exisn o WELL? NO
T_ STATIC WATER LEVEL Below- TOP *1CftftQ
(UnWHA*m Tap Qfow j
S. TUP OF CASING €S �r FI . ►iboAhr Land Sum
II K-1, 11 HiSl17A rq+5c av nlfa
6, YfELO t9aml: METHOD OF TES s
iQ, WATER 20NES OWN: -- -- -
11, CHLORINATION Tym EN Ar�tam!
12. CASING:
WaIl Th lO mem
❑8pth Okmator or WolghgFr. Material
From 0 To 30 Pt 2, rch 46 WHC
From Fk
From To -FL-
13. GROUT:
Pram 0 To 29 Ft CdrlwUBwrrkarlKr- Ire "e
From To —FL
14. SCREEN:
Depth nkmew " aw Sim - Ids
Fm 3D To 46 At 2" .010 PVC
FJVM To Ft
i±n1fT1 To FL
I& SA DMIR►111EL PACK:
Depth 8lze mah"
From T an To __O_Ft, Sefyd
Frey+ To Ft_
10. REMARKS:
04PTH _ aR1LUl1lt:` 690
Hom TO FaMMOOFF
H addet"I som I6 naeaed iAw beak of hm
LOCH-n !N Sf A
(6huw dbmdkin and dFUWAt 2W M RMWtkin
nou", a dtwr map relenenre poem]
H
AMMORO
I wHMEAY CEATW IHAf yvfu WAS 0644"wewa ie writ tW MAC 2C, VgEu ChN9TRUOMN
sr&mn&ww3, Am THAY sL WPYOFTHm ►mi nqp Hur P EbTOYHC:I0!LL VAM1*
C
"- 1 1 D,1Q2
rn MATME C C DATE
IIA"O 0" b nT,ta Oi&hft ftFM Vah*angy m6mpyja 1MWOVf1Y.

APPENDIX B
ROXBORO STEAM PLANT
PERMIT CONDITION A(G)
ATTACHMENT XXf VERSION 1.0
MARCH 17, 2011

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 17, 2011
Rf CE1 VE0 MAR
Mr. John Toepfer 2 4 1011
Senior Environmental Technical Specialist
Progress Energy Service Company, LLC
410 South Wilmington Street
PEB 4
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601
Subject: Progress Energy's North Carolina Ash Pond Facilities
Final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and Maps
Dear Mr. Toepfer:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Attached are the final Groundwater Monitoring Plans and maps for the Asheville, Cape Fear,
Lee, Mayo, Roxboro, Sutton, and Weatherspoon facilities. These plans and maps will be
incorporated in each facility's NPDES permits. Please note some minor additions and
corrections to the individual Groundwater Monitoring Plans.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Eric Smith at [phone] or me at (919)
715-6699.
Sincerely,
Debra J. Watts
Supervisor — Groundwater Protection Unit
Attachments
cc: APS Central Office Files w/ attachments
SWP — NPDES (Sergei Chernikov) wl attachments
Regional Offices — APS
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTIM
1636 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, Norlh Carolina 27699.1638 1 1
Location 2728 Capital Boulevard, Raleigh. North Carolina 2760' �NCirtlickli-ol I na
Phone: [phone] FAX 1: 919-715 0586. FAX 2: S1:-715 6048�, Customer Service 1.9771-523-67.1C I
Internel: www.ncwaterauality.org i
an Ea:,a- Upperlunn� Af 1T nairva �cla crer ayr

A. (6) GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION AND SAMPLING
1. The permittee shall conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine
the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater Standards
found under 15A NCAC 2L .0200
2. WELL CONSTRUCTION. Within 120 days of permit issuance, monitoring wells, as
proposed on Attachment XX, shall be installed to monitor groundwater quality.
a. Monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108
(Standards of Construction for Wells Other than Water Supply) and any other
jurisdictional laws and regulations pertaining to well construction. The general
locations forall monitoring wells are indicated on Attachment XX.
b. Within 30 days of completion of well construction, a completed Well
Construction Record (Form GW-1) must be submitted for each monitoring well
to Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection Section, 1636 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
C. The Raleigh Regional Office, telephone number [phone] shall approve
the location of new monitoring wells prior to installation. The regional office
shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to the construction of any monitoring
well and such notification to the Aquifer Protection Section's regional supervisor
shall be made from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
excluding State Holidays.
d. Within 60 days of completion of the monitoring wells, the Permittee shall
submit two original copies of a site map with a scale no greater than 1-inch
equals 500 feet. At a minimum, the map shall include the following
information:
i. The location and identity of each monitoring well.
ii. The location of major components of the waste disposal system.
iii. The location of property boundaries within 500 feet of the disposal
areas.
iv. The latitude and longitude of the established horizontal control
monument.
V. The elevation of the top of the well casing (i.e., measuring point)
relative to a common datum.
vi. The depth of water below the measuring point at the time the
measuring point is established.
vii. The location of compliance and review boundaries.
viii. The date the map is prepared and/or revised.
ix. Topographic contours in no more than ten (10) foot intervals
e. The above information should be overlaid on the most recent aerial photograph
taken of the site. Control monuments shall be installed in such a manner and
made of such materials that the monument will not be destroyed due to
activities taking place on the property. The map and any supporting
documentation shall be sent to the Division of Water Quality, Aquifer Protection
Section, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636.
f. The well(s) must be constructed by a North Carolina Certified Well Contractor,
the property owner, or the property lessee according to General Statutes 87-
98.4. If the construction is not performed by a certified well contractor, the
property owner or lessee, provided they are a natural person, must physically
perform the actual well construction activities.
NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Pagel of 4 3/17/11

g. The monitoring wells shall be regularly maintained. Such maintenance shall
include ensuring that the well caps are rust -free and locked at all times, the
outer casing is upright and undamaged, and the well does not serve as a conduit
for contamination.
3. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND COMPLIANCE. Monitoring wells shall be sampled after
construction and thereafter at the frequencies and for the parameters as specified in
Attachment XX. All maps, well construction forms, well abandonment forms and
monitoring data shall refer to the permit number and the well nomenclature as
provided on Attachment XX.
a. Per 15A NCAC 02H .0800, a Division certified laboratory shall conduct all
laboratory analyses for the required effluent, groundwater or surface water
parameters.
b. The measurement of water levels shall be made prior to purging the wells. The
depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the
top of the casing. The measurement of pH shall be made after purging and prior
to sampling for the remaining parameters.
C. The measuring points (top of well casing) of all monitoring wells shall be
surveyed to provide the relative elevation of the measuring point for each
monitoring well. The measuring points (top of casing) of all monitoring wells
shall be surveyed relative to a common datum.
d. For monitoring wells that are not located at the Compliance Boundary, the
Compliance Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR) is not required. However, predictive
calculations or modeling shall be submitted to the Regional Office annually (i.e.
12 months after permit issuance) demonstrating groundwater quality standards
at the Compliance Boundary.
e. Two copies of the monitoring well sampling shall be submitted on a Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR), and received no later than the last working day
of the month following the sampling month. Copies of the laboratory analyses
shall be kept on site, and made available upon request. The Compliance
Monitoring Form (GW-59CCR) shall include this permit number and the
appropriate well identification number. All information shall be submitted to
the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
f. For groundwater samples that exceed the ground water quality standards in
15A NCAC 02L .0202, the Regional Office shall be contacted within 30 days after
submission of the groundwater monitoring report; an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact of the waste disposal activities. Failure to do
so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation, fines, and/or penalties.
NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 2 of 4 3/17/11

4. COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY. The compliance boundary for the disposal system shall be
specified in accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a). This disposal system was
individually permitted prior to December 30, 1983; therefore, the compliance boundary
is established at either 500 feet from the effluent disposal area, or at the property
boundary, whichever is closest to the effluent disposal area. An exceedance of
groundwater standards at or beyond the compliance boundary is subject to remediation
action according to 15A NCAC 02L .0106(c) as well as enforcement actions in accordance
with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6Athrough 143-215.6C.
NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 3 of 4 3/17/11

ATTACHMENT XX — GROUNDWATER MONITORING PLAN
Permit Number: NC0003425
Version 1.0
WELL
NOMENCLATURE
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
FREQUENCY
Monitoring Wells:
CW-1, CW-2, CW-21),
CW-3, CW-3D, CW-4,
CW-5, BG1
Aluminum
Chloride
Mercury
TDS
April, July,
November
Antimony
Chromium
Nickel
Thallium
Arsenic
Copper
Nitrate
Water Level
Barium
Iron
PH
Zinc
Boron
Lead
Selenium
Cadmium
Manganese
Sulfate
Note 1: For locations of monitoring wells, see attached map.
Note 2: Monitoring revisions may be considered, as applicable, if there are no significant detections prior to permit
renewal.
NC0003425 — Roxboro Steam Station
Groundwater Monitoring Plan Page 4 of 4 3/17/11

t:3
Y.
al
4n
OD
C3
40
H
WB IP xl�
g
Z�
.0
4 -R CONIIIIIII IIIIP
GROUI DIIAII
ROXBORO ASH POND
s &ME
I :arl.rgyr zKT.

tip
syn,T(erra
RECEPTOR SURVEY
FOR
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
1700 DUNNAWAY ROAD
SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA 27343
NPDES PERMIT #NC0003425
PREPARED FOR
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
p DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
SUBMITTED: OCTOBER 2014
�y�ti3iHulr,,rr
ti•�+ y% CAR
SEAS.
1425
•'° ]fir I ie NC PG ?4;4 A
;ect GeologisV "r"*�tt�4��
0 E NSA p ••
SEA'
PG 1328
Manager
W.

Receptor Survey October2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................1
2.0
Background...................................................................................................................... 2
2.1
Plant and Ash Management Area Description...................................................... 2
2.2
Description of Surrounding Properties.................................................................. 2
3.0
Receptor Survey Activities............................................................................................ 3
3.1
NCDENR Records Review....................................................................................... 3
3.2
Person County GIS..................................................................................................... 3
3.3
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review .......................................... 3
3.4
USGS Hydrography Review.................................................................................... 4
3.5
SynTerra Field Survey............................................................................................... 4
4.0
Findings............................................................................................................................ 5
4.1
NCDENR Records...................................................................................................... 5
4.2
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records........................................................ 5
4.3
USGS Hydrography Review.................................................................................... 5
4.4
SynTerra Field Survey............................................................................................... 5
4.5
Summary of Receptor Survey Findings.................................................................. 6
List of Figures
Figure 1. Receptor Survey Map
List of Tables
Table 1. Public and Private Water Supply Wells
List of Appendices
Appendix A EDR Report
Page i
P: \ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ ALL NC SITES \ NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Receptor Survey \ Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (Duke Energy), owns and operates the Roxboro Steam
Electric Plant (Roxboro Plant), located near Semora, in Person County, North Carolina.
The Plant operates four coal-fired units. Coal combustion residuals (CCR) have
historically been managed at the Plant's on -site ash basins: the semi -active East Ash
Basin (operated from 1966 to present) and the active West Ash Basin (operated from
1973 to present). An unlined landfill was constructed on top of the East Ash Basin in
1988 for the placement of CCR. A lined landfill was constructed over the unlined
landfill in 2004. Figure 1 is a map showing the site and surrounding area.
Discharge from the ash basin is permitted by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Resources (DWR)
under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
NC0003425.
SynTerra has completed a receptor survey to identify water supply wells, public water
supplies, surface water bodies, and wellhead protection areas (if present) within a 0.5
mile radius of the Roxboro Plant ash basins compliance boundary (Figure 1). The
compliance boundary for groundwater quality in relation to the ash basin is defined in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02L .0107(a) as being established at either 500 feet from the
waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever is closer to the source.
The survey scope and findings are presented in the following sections.
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey\Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Plant and Ash Management Area Description
The Roxboro Plant is a coal-fired electricity -generating facility located in Person
County, North Carolina, near Semora, North Carolina. The location of the plant is
shown on Figure 1. The Roxboro Plant started operations in 1966.
The Plant is located on Dunnaway Road, approximately 10 miles north of the city of
Roxboro, North Carolina. The Plant is situated on the south side of Hyco Lake, a lake
formed from the impoundment of the Hyco River. The Plant property is roughly
bounded by Hyco Lake to the north and west, NC Highway 57 (Semora Road) to the
south and west, and State Highway 1336 (McGhees Mill Road) to the east. The overall
topography of the Plant generally slopes toward the north (Hyco Lake).
Wet ash and run off from the East Ash Basin/CCR landfill is contained in the West Ash
Basin which encompasses approximately 200 acres. The Roxboro Plant NPDES permit
(NC0003425) authorizes two discharges to Hyco Lake. Outfall 003 contains flow from
several waste streams and internal outfalls including once -through cooling water,
stormwater, and ash basin effluent. Outfall 006 primarily handles runoff from coal pile
and other coal handling and discharges to Hyco Lake after neutralization
sedimentation, and equalization.
2.2 Description of Surrounding Properties
Properties located within a 0.5 mile radius of the Roxboro Plant compliance boundary
are located in Person County, North Carolina. The properties uses include primarily
residential, agricultural, undeveloped land, and limited commercial/industrial. Figure
1 depicts the properties surrounding the Roxboro Plant.
Page 2
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Receptor Survey \ Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
3.0 RECEPTOR SURVEY ACTIVITIES
3.1 NCDENR Records Review
SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Department of Environmental Health (DEH) Public
Water Supply Sections (PWSS) Public Water Supply Water Sources Geographic
Information System (GIS) point data set (pwsws.shp) and the Water Distribution Map
Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal
(http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/main/home.page) to identify public water
supply sources and water supply lines within a 0.5 mile radius of the Roxboro Plant
compliance boundary.
According to the NC OneMap website, the Public Water Supply Water Sources point
data was current through November 18, 2009, and that it is the most current GIS data
set of public water supply locations available from North Carolina state agencies. The
GIS point data for the public water supply wells includes, but is not limited to
information such as public water supply (PWS) system identification numbers,
ownership information, PWS source type, well depth, and well yield. The WDMS data
set contains information on municipal water lines and other appurtenances.
On September 2, 2014, SynTerra reviewed the NCDENR Division of Water Resources
(DWR) Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) online database for public water
supply sources to identify wells located within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance
boundary; to confirm the location of wells included in the Public Water Supply Water
Sources GIS point data set, and to identify any wellhead protection areas located within
a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. The NCDENR SWAP database provides
detailed assessments of all public drinking water intakes and wellhead protection areas
in North Carolina. The website address is:
(http://swap.ncwater.org/website/swap/viewer.htm).
3.2 Person County GIS
Person County on-line GIS information was reviewed to identify any public utilities in
the area surrounding the Roxboro Plant and to verify field observations of parcel
ownership information.
3.3 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records Review
A review of public database information provided by Environmental Data Resources,
Inc. (EDR) was also conducted. The public water well information has been
incorporated in the summary table (Table 1) and on Figure 1. A copy of the EDR report
is included as Appendix A.
Page 3
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey\Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
3.4 USGS Hydrography Review
SynTerra reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography
Dataset (NHD) obtained from the USGS National Map Viewer
(http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/) to identify surface waters within a 0.5 mile
radius of the compliance boundary. Hydrography data obtained from the USGS NHD
is included on Figure 1.
3.5 SynTerra Field Survey
During March 2014, SynTerra personnel conducted a vehicular survey along public
roads located within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. Observations on
property use, apparent proximity to available municipal water lines and structures that
may represent potential water supply wells were noted.
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \ Roxboro \ Receptor Survey \ Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
4.0 FINDINGS
4.1 NCDENR Records
Two public water supply sources were identified in the Public Water Supply Water
Sources GIS point data set (obtained from NC OneMap GeoSpatial Portal) and on the
NCDENR SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the ash basins compliance
boundary. One of these sources is a recently installed water supply well located
adjacent to Woodland Elementary School (location DW-46 on Figure 1). The other
source is the Roxboro Plant's surface water intake, identified on Figure 1 as "EDR
Surface Water Intake". No wellhead protection areas were identified on the NCDENR
SWAP online database within a 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary.
The Water Distribution Map Service (WDMS) data set obtained from the NC OneMap
GeoSpatial Portal, did not identify municipal water supply lines located within the 0.5
mile radius of the compliance boundary.
4.2 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Records
The EDR report identified one "Water Well" located within 0.5 mile radius of the ash
basins compliance boundary. This well is the aforementioned well at Woodland
Elementary School and is reported to be 280 feet deep. The EDR report identified the
Roxboro Plant surface water intake but incorrectly designated it as a "Public Water
Supply Well." A copy of the EDR Report is provided in Appendix A.
4.3 USGS Hydrography Review
According to the USGS Hydrography map, Hyco Lake is a major surface water body
located within the survey radius (Figure 1). In addition to the reservoir, several surface
water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary. An
intake canal is located east of the Roxboro power plant that brings water from a portion
of Hyco Lake northeast of the Plant. A small stream flows north from the small pond
located on the east side of the CCR landfill and discharges to the intake canal. Sargents
Creek, and several minor tributaries of Sargents Creek, flow from the south into a
ponded area at the base of the West Ash Basin filter dam. The ponded water flows west
and then north through a canal before discharging to the heated wastewater mixing
area before ultimately discharging to Hyco Lake (outfall 003).
4.4 SynTerra Field Survey
SynTerra conducted a visual reconnaissance of the survey area by driving public road-
ways and noting properties that appeared to be developed or occupied. No municipal
water lines are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary.
Page 5
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey\Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

Receptor Survey October 2014
Roxboro Steam Electric Plant, NPDES Permit # NC0003425 SynTerra
Structures resembling water supply wells or well houses were noted where visible and
are shown on Figure 1 as reported/observed water supply wells (DW). Properties
within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary that appeared to be developed and
in -use (occupied) were assumed to have private water supply wells (PRW) even if not
noted during field reconnaissance because no public water supply is available in the
area. These properties are indicated on Figure 1.
4.5 Summary of Receptor Survey Findings
A summary of the receptor survey is discussed below. The suspected water supply
well locations shown on Figure 1 are based upon field observations, EDR, and
NCDENR information. The suspected well locations are numbered on the map to
cross-reference information provided in Table 1. The table summarizes property
location and site information where a water supply well may be present based upon
drive -by observations or EDR information.
• No wellhead protection areas were identified within a 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary;
• Approximately 57 possible private water supply wells are assumed to be located
within 0.5 mile radius of the compliance boundary;
• One water well was identified by NCDENR records and the EDR report
(Attachment 1). The well is located southwest of the Roxboro Plant at Woodland
Elementary School. EDR reports that the well is 280 feet deep, but no other
specific information was reported. The well location was observed during field
reconnaissance activities;
• NCDENR records and the EDR report identified the Roxboro Plant's surface
water intake structure (Figure 1);
• Several surface water features are present within the 0.5 mile radius of the
compliance boundary; and
• A portion of Hyco Lake is located within the survey radius (Figure 1).
Page 6
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables \Roxboro\ Receptor Survey\Roxboro
Receptor Survey.docx

FIGURE

LEGEND
ASSUMED PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELL
m _ REPORTED/OBSERVED WATER SUPPLY WELL
r m + IIIIIIIIIIg HALF MILE WATER WELL SURVEY BOUNDARY
/ PROPERTYLINE (APPROXIMATE) F PRW-2! : _ sHORE°R _ DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ROXBORO PLANT
BOUNDARY
-n 500 ft COMPLIANCE
* r Rnt�ROAO WASTE BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINE (PERSON CO GIS)
\
UNLINED LANDFILL LIMITS
• • . ' ' ter+•
/,_� it ? , ' �•. ' AoN /-. �-------•----------- �—• NIPR � ? „� _ •
r f •' LINED LANDFILL LIMIT
SHORE
°` ' t EDR 1 EDR REPORTED WATER SUPPLY (APPROXIMATE)
~� 1
�— O\NPASTEL.—_-
PRW-1---
L
• J RpJ�ROP r rr- S.
�*
tr 11
_ RAILROAD � - '' � �t`.JL
two7
IL
If L y P GYPSUM PAD r�
�k a � 4 r' t _ by
'• 1
rdf
ti!
lwFr
`_ G, POWER PLANT' — - r
DW-1
~ • � .. �E + �,y -_�. PRW-3
• EL,
IURFACE" -0*_ I I UW-2 DW-3
- WATER 0
r - INTAKE / �- — I T DW 4
` MY 0-- I DW-6
Ll
40
1966 SEMI -ACTIVE ,' 1 - _ :'■,' ; _ DW 10
- ASH BASIN�-
} _ - LINED LANDFILL I - I _ DW-12
/ ' 1
DW-13
;0 RESERVOIR I r '•; �' -
r�y1 • �'•� DW-14
w.~_---------'-------------------------------- �• �• -- �; ";�b*} r, DW-16 DW-17
W.
I ti r: DW-18 DW-19
\ D W-2 /2 D W-20
r - •• DW-22
r 5
DW-27
1 , LE
r - - }i r , •?,• r ■� 5•, ' , ` 1 ' k• - �•, DW-28 r DW-29 . I I S. •t' *j .•'jT :�.
• - - 1 • ' �• - ~ W 1 y ' r ti•' 1 % DW-30 - ' ,�-c Z1. ;'C�: �:_+,-n•.�,,,
1 � � - I - _ �'
•1. DW-31 - -
ti
_ , • t �i_ '1 � T, �.�,� J � L � - - 1:: • � _: '.• ' \ - SOURCES:
- r- y :y• 1 \ \ 1. 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF PERSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WAS OBTAINED
* � i
FROM THE USGS EARTH EXPLORER WEB SITE AT http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
•r r •� ti 1 �; 2. WELL SURVEY INFORMATION, PROPERTY LINE, LANDFILL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES ARE
■ ti ' �*� _ 1#;., ' y ,� I ' rti',/ FROM ARCGIS FILES PROVIDED BY S&ME AND PROGRESS ENERGY.
� F' •� T_ }�_{ � - - _ _ . a � _ �• ' /, � � �.>�? 3. PARCEL BOUNDARIES WERE OBTAINED FROM PERSON COUNTY GIS DATA AT
y % 7ii ;., htt // is. ersoncount net
E • r H BASIN ACTIVE _ t r - t' RI■f +. r ■, - /, 4. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014.
4 AS ' - '' ' -
_ / / \ 5. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE
,,� Jr •'+ 1-r r, •1• r - I� 1 1 •1r. '`� {• �7•�r *mil" r ' ° '1 •rr .• ''\ I PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM RIPS 3200 (NAD 83).
4-1
+5+17' '' 1J'�, a ,-• ■ rJa � L , 1 ih., 1 DW-33 DW 34 p PRW-5 w yR0 DW 39 �'' I GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600 1200
FEET)
IN
'. # • y+, t' 1' � ��; 1 �� *r , ' ■ S ' _ � ` 1 I 1 . L O � DW-41 (
_k r
'1 ' •' - ' ' rr•Ir , i .1 1+. - r. ti '. ,• '• 1:QO• j -\- �' ,\
rl
Ic .. L �. ■ ` ,1: V. , mil,• _ i ;' .,1 -.. _ •ti { '
cr
Jam_ / \
erra
:%
' , r 1 ' -, • 1' — • ,1 jJ J •1 , ' , •�•
99
++r, �_ -. ; • - y J ?' •- >` r �' F - ' ._ � ~ - I r' - - �•, • , _--� • y - -_',� .- ,,� �
148 River Street, Suite 220 - i Greenville, South Carolina 29601r----864-421-9999
� ' www.synterracorp.com
.. 13y� .s '11 •• +� tiL� •zti'' , :• Via' �' ,. k -z �•' )� T % , _
E, era . .'i: r 1.' / /�
_ 1• , •,. DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 2014
r r - •-10-09
YL
P 1.. _ i r•1 i L '�
- ;� 1•_� _ F;, +i ; ��'. r•�' j. j I CHECKED BY: J. WYLIE DATE: 2014-10-09
_ ' - DW-46 )-�■��i - Y h,L j 1
lb
PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB
,
LAYOUT NAME: FIG 1(RECEPTOR SURVEY)
DW-47 RO �NL N/GN �i ti y . .. rr , A r '. }� - - - - �'qY - - ■ ' 21'
OL
DUKE
Z,
• , ■ ,` /. \ •\ ,\� tL 1 1 .���_ s. r __� •, } r r ram: I- �, __• '.- a. �l' r yr ` - �I•./'' I (I/
r ENERGY
r 'MATCHLINE — - — — '—
,. D W-42
i'`f i #~ `_ - �_ q DW-43 ; �= PROGRESS
�� r. 1{ ■ V I ,�xw • fJrti i °yiFc DW-44 — PRW-8 i'
L,_ 1_ • �1• _• r I �y • _L .~ • �I ,ti _� •' : I PRW-6 I yTONRo 1R 00 DUNNAWA RD OXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DW-45 I PRW-7 PRW-9 SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
r, , o
1 . FIGURE 1
ti•y-;. r' - 1 I `� R„ I F 1. ry-',(t Ir�__ O�, RECEPTOR SURVEY MAP
� - I - - - - - MATC_ HLWE -SEE INSERTA � �� ' � ' - - - - \ I--------- � J I ,'� '�
1
�' INSERT A

TABLE

TABLE 1
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS
WITHIN 0.5 MILE RADIUS OF ASH MANAGEMENT AREA COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
Map Well
ID #
PARCEL ID
STATE
ZIP
CODE
PARCEL ADDRESS
(Well Location)
FIELD DESCRIPTION / NOTES
DW-1
9989-04-64-9710.000
NC
27343
4291 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-2
9989-04-64-8345.000
NC
27703
2437 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-3
9989-04-74-0468.000
NC
27343
4268 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-4
9989-04-74-0333.000
NC
27343
4236 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-5
9989-04-63-6998.000
NC
27343
4165 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-6
9989-04-74-0104.000
NC
27343
4180 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-7
9989-04-63-9887.000
NC
27343
4164 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-8
9989-04-73-0609.000
NC
27343
4114 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-9
9989-04-73-0508.000
NC
27343
4094 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-10
9989-04-63-9590.000
NC
27343
4072 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-11
9989-04-82-4547.000
NC
27587
4034 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-12
9989-04-63-9166.000
NC
27587
4014 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-13
9989-04-62-9926.000
NC
27574
3962 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-14
9989-04-62-9806.000
MD
20744
MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-15
9989-04-62-8666.000
NC
27343
3924 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-16
9989-04-62-5459.000
NC
27573
3893 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-17
9989-04-62-8437.000
NC
27573
3892 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-18
9989-04-62-5218.000
NC
27343
3853 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-19
9989-04-62-7287.000
NC
27343
3854 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-20
9989-04-62-7168.000
NC
27574
3830 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-21
9989-04-52-9154.000
NC
27343
3781 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-22
9989-04-61-6844.000
NC
27343
3770 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-23
9989-04-61-3835.000
NC
27343
3749 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-24
9989-04-61-1903.000
NC
27343
65 THE JOHNSON LN
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-25
9989-04-51-8907.000
NC
27343
135 THE JOHNSON LN
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-26
9989-04-52-5074.000
NC
27343
156 THE JOHNSON LN
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-27
9989-04-61-0224.000
NC
27343
3617 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-28
9989-04-51-9175.000
NC
27343
3599 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-29
9989-04-61-3029.000
NC
27573
MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-30
9989-04-51-8091.000
NC
27343
3579 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-31
9989-04-60-1882.000
NC
27343
3558 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-32
9989-04-50-7893.000
NC
27343
MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-33
9988-01-39-1733.000
NC
27574
399 DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\NLL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables\Roxboro\Receptor Suwey\Tables\Table 1 Public Private Well Supply.xlsx Page 1 of 2

TABLE 1
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS
WITHIN 0.5 MILE RADIUS OF ASH MANAGEMENT AREA COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, INC., SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA
Map Well
ZIP
PARCEL ADDRESS
ID #
PARCEL ID
STATE
CODE
(Well Location)
FIELD DESCRIPTION /NOTES
DW-34
9988-01-39-2741.000
NC
27343
381 DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-35
9988-01-39-8619.000
NC
27343
285 DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-36
9989-03-40-0170.000
NC
27573
DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-37
9988-01-49-1710.000
NC
27573
225 DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-38
9988-01-49-8582.000
NC
27343
67 DUNNAWAY RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-39
9988-02-59-1781.000
NC
27343
3291 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-40
9988-02-59-8579.000
NC
27343
3773 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-41
9988-02-59-8579.000
NC
27343
3773 MCGHEES MILL RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-42
9988-01-36-0728.000
NC
27574
520 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-43
9988-01-36-5373.000
NC
27574
462 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-44
9988-01-36-7254.000
NC
27574
430 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-45
9988-01-35-1957.000
NC
27574
507 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD
Well structure observed in yard; no municipal water lines in area
DW-46
9978-02-56-5922.000
NC
27573
7391 SEMORA RD
Water supply well with water tower; well reported to be 280 feet
deep by EDR report
DW-47
9978-02-66-1992.000
NC
27574
7275 SEMORA RD
Well structure observed behind building; no municipal water lines
in area
Occupied/Operational industrial facility; reported to have water
DW-48
9989-01-16-5827.000
NC
27343
921A SHORE RD
supply well; no municipal water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-1
9989-01-08-7367.000
NC
27343
137 COW PASTURE LN
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-2
9989-01-07-2923.000
NY
10457
224 MARTHA ROYSTER RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-3
9989-04-74-1639.000
NC
27343
4300 MCGHEES MILL RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-4
9989-04-50-4836.000
NC
27343
3469 MCGHEES MILL RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-5
9988-01-49-7632.000
NC
27343
101 DUNNAWAY RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-6
9988-01-35-4849.000
NC
27574
461 ARCHIE CLAYTON RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-7
9988-01-36-6080.000
NC
27574
ARCHIE CLAYTON RD 395
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-8
9988-01-05-4153.000
NC
27574
571 DAISY THOMPSON RD
water lines in area
Occupied residence; no well structure observed; no municipal
PRW-9
9988-00-14-0931.000
NC
27574
556 DAISY THOMPSON RD
water lines in area
Notes: Map Well ID # refers to well number shown on the Water Well Survey Map. Parcel ID, owner, and address information were obtained from the
Person County, North Carolina website (http://www.personcounty.net/index.aspx?page=138).
W - Possible water well. Water line not available. No well observed.
0 - Observed water well.
P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\ALL NC SITES\NPDES Permit Deliverables\Roxboro\Receptor Suwey\Tables\Table 1 Public Private Well Supply.xlsx Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX A
EDR REPORT

Duke Energy - Roxboro
1700 Dunnaway Rd.
Roxboro, NC 27574
Inquiry Number: 3887591.1s
March 21, 2014
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
www.edrnet.comt.com Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc Toll Free:
FORM-NULL-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
PAGE
Physical Setting Source Addendum
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary --------------------------------------------
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched ------------------------------------
A-16
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC3887591.1s Page 1

GEOCHECK9 - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE REPORT
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
DUKE ENERGY - ROXBORO
1700 DUNNAWAY RD.
ROXBORO, NC 27574
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Most Recent Revision
36.4689 - 36' 28' 8.04"
79.0743 - 79' 4' 27.48"
Zone 17
672539.2
4037480.5
503 ft. above sea level
36079-D1 OLIVE HILL, NC
1994
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC3887591.1s Page 1

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General NNW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
c
0
W
O
•N
.A A A .�
N ONO OND � N
O
1\VI \I1
M
> A
� V1
W. _ . _ . _ . -^'
A W
p
V1 O O
West
TIP
N N
A A /yW
ro ��
TIP
0
Target Property Elevation: 503 ft.
1/2
East
1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC3887591.1s Page 2

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Target Property County
PERSON, NC
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
OLIVE HILL
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
37145C - FEMA DFIRM Flood data
Not Reported
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC3887591.1s Page 3

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
:AZa :F� 1:L1111 0:L1011411 ki 1 I I
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Metamorphic Rocks
System: Pennsylvanian
Series: Felsic paragneiss and schist
Code: m m 1 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: WILKES
Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: MODERATE
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 10 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 20 inches
TC3887591.1s Page 4

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
6 inches
fine sandy loam
Granular
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 6.00
Max: 6.50
materials (35
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 2.00
Min: 5.10
pct. or less
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty, or
50%), silt.
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
6 inches
13 inches
clay loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 0.60
Max: 7.80
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.20
Min: 6.10
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Clayey
50%), Lean Clay
Soils.
3
13 inches
48 inches
weathered
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
bedrock
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
loam
loamy sand
clay loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
loam
loamy sand
clay loam
Shallow Soil Types: clay loam
clay
loam
silt loam
sandy clay loam
Deeper Soil Types: sandy loam
sandy clay loam
fine sandy loam
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
TC3887591.1s Page 5

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS 1.000
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
2 NCO273409 112 - 1 Mile NNE
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 NC2000000009826 1/2 - 1 Mile SW
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL HERITAGE ELEMENT OCCURRENCES
ID Class
NC50011604 Plants
NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION GAME LANDS DATABASE
Site Name
NC30000019
NC30000021
NC30000022
NC30000024
TC3887591.1s Page 6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP-3887591.1s
NCounty Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
Power transmission lines
0 Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
0
0 114 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction E2 Wildlife Areas
ffD Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location 0 Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
M100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
. National Wetland Inventory
SITE NAME: Duke Energy - Roxboro
CLIENT: SynTerra
ADDRESS: 1700 Dunnaway Rd.
CONTACT: Richard Jacobs
Roxboro NC 27574
INQUIRY #: 3887591.1s
LAT/LONG: 36.4689 / 79.0743
DATE: March 21, 2014 11:22 am
Copyright U 2014 EDR, Inc. & 2010 Tale Atlas Rel. 07/2009.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Database EDR ID Number
1
SW
NC WELLS NC2000000009826
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
Pwsidentif:
NCO273431
System nam:
WOODLAND ELEM SCHOOL
Pws type:
NTNC
County:
PERSON
City:
ROXBORO
Primary so:
GW
Water type:
GW
Facility n:
WELL #3
Facility a:
S03
Latitude m:
36.462214
Longitude :
-79.082685
Availavili:
A
Well depth:
280
Well dep 1:
FT
Owner name:
PERSON COUNTY SCHOOLS_0273407
Site id:
NC2000000009826
2
NNE
FRDS PWS NCO273409
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
Pwsid:
NCO273409
Epa region:
04
State:
NC
County:
Person
Pws name:
ROXBORO STEAM PLANT
Population Served:
500
Pwssvcconn:
7
PWS Source:
Surface —water
Pws type:
NTNCWS
Status:
Active
Owner type:
Private
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO
STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
sedimentation
Treatment objective:
iron removal
Contact name:
ROWLAND, CECIL E
Original name:
ROWLAND, CECIL E
Contact phone:
336-599-1174
Contact address1:
1700 DUNNAWAY RD
Contact address2:
Not Reported
Contact city:
SEMORA
Contact zip:
27343
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
sludge treatment
Treatment objective:
iron removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution —system —zone
Treatment process:
ph adjustment, pre
Treatment objective:
iron removal
TC3887591.1s Page 8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
iron removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
ph adjustment, pre
coagulation
coagulation
coagulation
coagulation
coagulation
filtration, pressure sand
filtration, pressure sand
filtration, pressure sand
filtration, pressure sand
filtration, pressure sand
TC3887591.1s Page 9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution —system —zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
flocculation
flocculation
flocculation
flocculation
flocculation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sludge treatment
TC3887591.1 s Page 10

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
inorganics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO
STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO
STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
manganese removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
sludge treatment
sedimentation
sedimentation
sludge treatment
sludge treatment
sludge treatment
sludge treatment
sludge treatment
flocculation
flocculation
flocculation
TC3887591.1 s Pagel l

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO
STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
disinfection by-products control
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO
STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment plant
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
39228
Facility name:
HYCO LAKE
Facility type:
Intake
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
organics removal
Facility id:
50722
Facility name:
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Facility type:
Distribution_system_zone
Treatment process:
Treatment objective:
corrosion control
flocculation
flocculation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sedimentation
sedimentation
ph adjustment, pre
ph adjustment, pre
ph adjustment, pre
ph adjustment, pre
ph adjustment
TC3887591.1 s Page 12

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Facility id:
5652
Facility name:
TREATMENT_PLT_ROXBORO STM WTP
Facility type:
Treatment_ plant Treatment process:
ph adjustment
Treatment objective:
corrosion control
Facility id:
1176
Facility name:
STORAGE—GROUND-1
Facility type:
Storage Treatment process:
ph adjustment, post
Treatment objective:
corrosion control
Facility id:
3117
Facility name:
STORAGE—HYDRO-1
Facility type:
Storage Treatment process:
ph adjustment, post
Treatment objective:
corrosion control
PWS ID:
NCO273409
Date Initiated:
6405 Date Deactivated: Not Reported
PWS Name:
ROXBORO STEAM PLANT
ROXBORO, NC 27573
Addressee / Facility:
System Owner/Responsible Party
DR G J OLIVER OR MANAGER NOW
PO BOX 1551--CPB 3A2
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Addressee / Facility:
System Owner/Responsible Party
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO
PO BOX 1551--CPB 3A2
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Facility Latitude:
36 28 50 Facility Longitude:
079 04 10
Facility Latitude:
36 23 36 Facility Longitude:
078 58 59
City Served:
ROXBORO
Treatment Class:
Treated Population:
00000250
Violations information not reported.
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
System Name:
ROXBORO STEAM PLANT
Violation Type:
MCL, Average
Contaminant:
DI (2-ETHYLHEXYL) ADIPATE
Compliance Period:
1995-01-01 - 1995-03-31
Violation ID:
9541524
Enforcement Date:
1995-03-27 Enf. Action:
State Formal NOV Issued
TC3887591.1 s Page 13

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC —WILD
NC30000019
Site Name:
Hyco
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Archery Zone
Acres:
758.943176269531
Status:
PRV
County:
PERSON
NC —WILD
NC30000021
Site Name:
Hyco
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Archery Zone
Acres:
310.483093261719
Status:
PRV
County:
PERSON
NC —WILD
NC30000022
Site Name:
Hyco
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Restricted Firearms Zone
Acres:
183.970397949219
Status:
PRV
County:
PERSON
NC —WILD
NC30000024
Site Name:
Hyco
Owner:
Carolina Power & Light
Site Type:
Game Land
Acres:
558.192077636719
Status:
PRV
County:
PERSON
NC_NHEO
NC50011604
GISID:
113466
Classification by Type:
Plants
Occurrence Status:
X
TC3887591.1 s Page 14

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
2 0.95 0.8 1.1
Federal EPA Radon Zone for PERSON County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for PERSON COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 1
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor
1.200 pCi/L
100%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
% >20 nCi/I
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC3887591.1s Page15

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC3887591.1 s Page A-16

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC3887591.1 s Page A-17

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC3887591.1 s Page A-18

LEGEND
PC
r 1 ' n 1 _ ,
.~ L }� , r , ' ^ 1 r7i ii��_ iR` ILROAD i I ' 1 it ! ■ _ ..' _ • L
_ _ _ s �_ - r , y $ BG-1 BACKGROUND MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
1NO 1
�• - '•�JLI
'� - i $ CW-1 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
`• �� I.
L ti-J _ ' Ire 1,' - 1,'1~1 1 _ 1, , T �' •+ — ' •r rL
L a 1 i— 1 1 1 1 k I. r• 1
I t R 1
f ' _ ''�+ 1 l - m ,: �'• 9 CMW-11 LANDFILL MONITORING WELL (SURVEYED)
_ + ,i .. _ - ' _ ti • _ % '� %, ' ASH LANDFILL LEACHATE SAMPLE LOCATION
- _. _ ._ .. ti _ 'w P-2
� � •�1 � .� 1 .� ,� + �1 . 1 :t _ L •■ 1 1 •y ti � � (APPROXIMATE)
- `�" OPP1 - ,■ f : DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS ROXBORO PLANT
1 ��, _ r • _ - y. - - 500 ft COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY
L
% —1L. - - _# _ r r _ GYPSUM PAD _ + - - �i' �_1 L 1 - WASTE BOUNDARY
I I `T� 1• _ UNLINED LANDFILL LIMITS
f _ , ' r k �■1 ' �� r ' ` - — 1- } _ �i • - ' r G.
_ �• �- r. r ' + , I .L---------- LINED LANDFILL LIMIT
A.
ti • - POWER PLANT - r * GENERALIZED GROUNDWATER FLOW
ti . _._ u-- ., ,w. - - - ` _ L; - _ ♦ DIRECTION
z S 1 , '��3 .* ly ;� ' • SUPPORTED BY GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
JL •y� L. POINT OR TOPOGRAPHIC DATA
L �■ I T •i r
ME
- - + CMW-10 CW-1 I t • ••, _
1
s 1 _ 1 1 : r• .1 1 __ " " _ F"
r_ ■ , L_ _ ��` - �' J M
a, - • r _ . _
. t i _
'� ■ I �I 1 /� �\ I L9
61
L Lr_ SEMI -ACTIVE \ -P-2 "/ I � � f i I
3 1
_ : • �_ 1_ ,J1 Li ASH BASIN ,. I i i f = 1 _ L1 7 '-
_ i I +,,�-1 r _ 1 I 1
ry/ LINED LANDFILL L , + _' �' 1 ti 0 r
,', i , '•� mo■ '1 te r, - J_ CW-5 P-3 I� _ ' •r , 1_— T •, �' - 'r SOURCES:
r �•.' �' ti 1 1. 2012 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH OF PERSON COUNTY,
® _ I _
CW-2D _ ' •, r''~ NORTH CAROLINA WAS OBTAINED FROM THE USGS
EARTH EXPLORER WEB SITE AT
� T • x, • �.t
3 _ -• �' ��,I• http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
err' - ; - 2. WELL SURVEY INFORMATION, PROPERTY LINE,
r TOE DRAINS r z f .r• +� 1 * 1 . _ ,
1 1 1 L , r; r , •,, LANDFILL LIMITS AND BOUNDARIES ARE FROM ARCGIS
■+ �� -r P-4 �♦ , , , FILES PROVIDED BY S&ME AND PROGRESS ENERGY.
. ,L 1 r
IN
dF
r ; + ' • ' \\\`.� ' I ; 1 t' r _ 3. 2014 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH WAS OBTAINED FROM WSP
'-------------/------------------------------------------------- _ r•r INC ' _ _ -_ . •` 1'�' FLOWN ON APRIL 17, 2014
i r' T ' }- 4. DRAWING HAS BEEN SET WITH A PROJECTION OF
__ _ T �' 9 CMW-7 �', ti' �Y• L �4yn FPS NORTH CAROL 83).STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM
NAL IN
L� l
L 1 — I. j . ti L • ri 1_ ' ` • 1. , r _ L`� `I ' .1-
.A `,�� 0
1 F♦ ti SL•, 1 , I % L 1 4
r _ .fir f�i• - -% _
L� - � CMW-8 e 1 �- _sm
• T }I , r� 1'* L'r# - r'- - - CMW-9 e - 1<25
' r. Lti . 1 _ • _ ' •'i r ' F ' \` • �I �O O
I ' •' � k '• �L L - •" ■ T' 1 - %' 1, � �' • r. • • � {{F'i. -rF' ■ __ _ } ti , ,,1,
IN
LL
NINEEN
R •r 1•
Ilia
R L " �J ' - - 1 • 1 _ Jerry Wylie, NC PG 1425
_ • ` r{�•r �� ,• - L .� _ _�' _ } I ,r _ Project Scientist
_ 'T1 •ry •ti f 11 _ r �r IL wpm. ,
IN E 1.
. '■' ' • •,•• ' _• �,� 1 1 I`• _ I ■ �• � ,•• 'L -'� ~ - '• �•.� J _ ■-1 _ • •' d S�t}t C am/
OL:
_ ' � � � � :1 � -• - - r1� Ir_ r � 5p/�C'`y, Icy
1 r -'.•J •'' J ' 1 �, •.2 ti , - '■ �,u ■L _''n ' ILL _ '•, _ ~• _•1 _ ;}{(laErj�
IN
71
OG
' ■ - y1 ,' 1 •Ir■ 1■ _ r .r.l ! i if� , • 1 r _ - f _ _ A ~\� r w�! L_j• _ J' _ 1 1'
1 r 1 i y • ti - L 1 _ . ■ 1, r. ', - 'T _ Z , ■ ' _ Lj
' fir_ j' - 1 J'r f�y '-` r '�,� _ .1 �� �' _' 1 1 «IlAILLL:kLt
,I + - rk,l�■ -DUNNAWAY Rp r I N.
■ ■ 1 • T L 1 . ..%_ _ 1., _ '� Kathy Webb, NC PG 1328
. NO
�1 ,y _ ti _ 1973 ACTIVE Lp , ' 1 - - _ _ _ _ _ 16 T r Mr Project Manager
IN { - ASH BASIN ' :. ' L IL IN Ikr t, ~1 ' _ , %rdr.A 0. , IN J L
r
-' ,* _� 4• _ _ '_'�ti�' 1� �- at�ti�'. _ ' 1 1/ - 1 •_ ' _ M i - GRAPHIC SCALE
%
•1 • • , v , , ■ T i _- mrdd ti - - No 3
�` - I 1 L 1 i * ■ Ia ■ ' 1-I 400 0 200 400 800
_ ~ Ir ■ ,, Ja f r 1'' '' r ir`r, '1 L , • k, , ; _ r J -� ' ■ -' ■ 7 1 (IN FEET)
NNA
IN
■- _ _
` v y '2 �'} 'L' rl _ r �' DUNNAWAY RD —1 ■_ 1 ' �' A
�• • _ 1 1 ,
■ 1 _ �. W' _ . '� r ■ ■ tr''1 L..i 1 _ ~ -
AL IN
' {•_ • _ r •� tiIpL • LJI J Y
%
L '. 1 ti - r 1
•1 �:. �• -
f .q _ . \ ti
L
L. _ ,Ir L ,L
y', CW-3 %k ,
• , .. ir _� 'ti 0 ''r k1. _ I
-1 r11 1
�� r, ■ ter. 1 , '� • y I a'' fir•• - ~ ' •' ' L■L•■
1 ' ,
1 �� _ • 1 1■r I �.Ll
I -Alm OL
le
F I 1 'r `ti
r' . - r y JhA Lti -1. 1
L 1
r•�- � — � - . 1•.L
IN
ON, _ _ _ T
_ BG-1 -
NIL
C W-4 - rT
1 ■ L • Ir ,
SUM 1 I , 1 ' r . •� III IN
F r - 1 '1 J ■ a,1 -1 - IN
r Op _ ~ ;i _ 1 I 1
IN
rN
1 _ , _
WOODLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Q.
L `1 ■ 1 w i '•� I fi }
�' 1 d Lr - 1`I1-.' ' TIL
r I
%
• 1 . L
L .01 � %L- III _ . . .. i _ A r J
IL 2
IN
�I ■
r'Y • -
4 ■' J '' 11_ --� ,J r r � L�■1 r' 1 .1 i i . _
L 1. 1 1 ••J L', 1 51 r', r 51 1 0'. r
1.
r!fir -
■
r 1
L I
• kl — � 1 1
s IL y i ' -.1
s
i ec L L I .
1
1 j j,
INN brw
IN - L s erra
- 1 148 River Street, Suite 220
Greenville, South Carolina 29601
- ' ' I • T4• r ■ + 864-421-9999
• 1 ' - www.synterracorp.com
' �■ DRAWN BY: S. ARLEDGE DATE: 2014-10-09
r f •• CHECKED BY: J. WYLIE DATE: 2014-10-09
■r
"� r, •Lti Ir e r - PROJECT MANAGER: KATHY WEBB
r 1 LAYOUT NAME:FIG 1 (GEN GW FLOW)
- DUKE
1
,:- • • ENERGY
■
n -
- - PROGRESS
ROXBORO STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT
1700 DUNNAWAY RD
SEMORA, NORTH CAROLINA ♦
FIGURE 1
GENERALIZED GROUND WATER
•��;.*- *�r ._�,I,k« FLOW DIRECTION