The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20091351 Ver 2_401 Application_20100110o?-k3sk crdwdecli In America's Most Popular Backyards' Re: PCN Submission January 6, 2010 To Whom It May Concern, V9? We thank you in advance for your review and consideration of this project. We have enclosed several items along with the "Pre-Construction Authorization (PCN) Form". They are as follows: Completed PCN Form Feature Identification letter from NCDENR Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Letter #2007-002 G ? I- ,1 1 Survey map showing proposed project AN Pictures showing existing site conditions OENR-WAfEn0Uw1ffr VOL ANDS ANO STOW.9, ATEe 6RANCH Architectural drawings of project showing: Page 1 - limits of zones 1 & 2 Page 2 - plan view of proposed project Yage 37 elevation view of proposed project PO Box 364 Garner, NC 27529 919-733-2533 ralei ghdurham_archadeck.net Archadeck of Raleigh - Durham Off. 733-2533 Cell: 862-6821 0- t 3 5? U 2? OF WATk spa o? [Form ffice Use Only: 1 D > orps action ID no. WQ project no. Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the ??? Corps: ? Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not or General Permit (GP) number. A ? Yes fZ No N /A required? 401 Certification: NI/4 ? Yes Z No ? Yes No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation ? Yes W No bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. ? Yes ? No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? =Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: 1(4 kt rm woos LAIN E CA 1cY , NC 2b. County: 2c. Nearest municipality/ town 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T,I.P. or state project no: (n4 tL%( V111-1'C(S MI LL i Lc;,T -A NIA o3f3 -- J" A' 211 Vr"E1?yDcYR- WA r" WA, AND S ?...<<Ify Page 1 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 3. Owner Information - 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: GeaOL + CkT?/NC 4NN Moi4N 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 30 b 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): JJ A 3d. Street address: >I (? `CE IT}F tNt?o Q I•?NE 3e. City, state, zip: CAlK- 1 I `i1C, ZIT O 3f. Telephone no.: N; 3?°l-I?'1 S CtcL: GOZ -Zq'](o 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: F . Applicant Information (if different from owner) a. Applicant is: Agent ? Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: ?AKS 5b. Business name: .9x_gA u_+ QNCLIq?- I?c M 5c. Street address: Pv 5d. City, state, zip: C?fi??? ? IJ[ ? L'1 S2 9 5e. Telephone no.: OFF : ?73-25'33 cecL: gi2-6152 1 5f. Fax no.: .773 - Zf 1 / 5g. Email address: WAI-IMU li:(v W_ . Rr.Co,~m Page 2 of 14 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): POO p7&3-OtaDTO& 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude: - (DD. DDDD) (-DD. DDDD) 1c. Property size: p, Zy (acres) 2. S ea H 2a. Nbody of water (stream, river, etc.) to Tp (SQ Ox p 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS Zrr IVS W 2c. River basin: _....._......_.._.__----------------- --...---._.__...._.... tiew __.__.__ 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this . application: GrP5K#tL 4wh U% 10 = SINa(t 604 lt?!( CesIi0eJL l14L.. . `ME eormmeoL AN ?>ksn .46d?E 60C*6122- s[?4T TEI? Eck -?[Ey wovc.A Ltke 40 E?4P aU 'Tl?t 9E:1414+ Or- T99: dMe- V A 600E C."410E _ _VANEs Q-&rw{Ku 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 45 (acres) 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: Z NTMA11TM r °r (linear feet) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: 1s??1? DiM+? ? Cus?,HC?cS v u?t'?w2 U ?111? t nrttE w tT?}oyr 11?t"?RF?.RW?j t? r1?4 t cEilr?c?N or- Af46 o rWeA. Atjw:A_ R., r.,? .,.,?..,. a... ?- I'Z=y t t i v ptc.(L wtr!! >? sate?u cc !? I+r?+Q /l1J?lu? 3yy o G tw; S3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Some OFCk w?c? ?c. q-? r4lv?+r q L MT' rr'S 1-0 w63T' PO UST . ?Jlo MII 10e l wl LL 1K.9 vsaEh Dyo-cme- eons av46A) AAA Au_ wolLV +lD $E do,uF_ a./ 64 ?1 ? lL ?ly ? l t oc wlc,c 6F_ ooa_6? I ,u? s t >Er cam -?E p (? Page 3 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes ? No Unknown Comments: Ayotr ? iLLwVt 6 r- fJ A D?R,t tUut,7 4hwr 44 FeATIAt C??N L ymme 'h 44A& ,s me om 14!i ? t y ,u 1-49; ?1to p cRr/ 1 S aAssl F[ffd AS A70 l !v 119" MEWn- s`tn "Al . 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ? Preliminary F] Final N 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company: Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History- 5a. Have permits or a tions been requested or-? obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the n?ct7 Yes ? No Unknown E] 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? I F1 Yes W No 6b. If yes, explain. P, Page 4 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ? Wetlands ? Streams -tributaries Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts NONF If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. Wetland impact number - Type of impact Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 2c. 2d. 2e. Type of jurisdiction Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 (if known) (Yes or No) DWQ - non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W2 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W3 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W4 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W5 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W6 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W7 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ W8 ? P ? T ? Corps ? DWQ 2h. Comments: 2g. Total wetland impacts Page 5 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 3. Stream Impacts - If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. Wo0t. 3a. 3b. 3c. 73d.Perenrnial 3e. f3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name r Type of Average Impact number - nt jurisdiction stream length Permanent (P) (Corps - 404, 10 width (linear or Temporary (T) DWQ -non-404, (feet) feet) other) S1 ?P ?T S2El P?T S3?P?T S4?P?T S5El P?T S6El P?T 3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts - If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or an other o en water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e: Open water Name of impact number- waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 ?P?T 01 ?P?T 01 ? P ? T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: No?L Page 6 of 14 PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 5. Pond or Lake Construction - If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. k7ft 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? ? Neuse ? Catawba ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other: ? Randleman 6b. Buffer impact 6c. 6d. number - Reason for Permanent (P) or impact Stream name Temporary T 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. 6g. Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact (square feet) (square feet) B1 fK;l p ? T Mob 91-0 T-'0ke-Ca ce- nec U ANN DOWOS NO 8$ Z7$ B2 ?P?T B3 ? P ? T Page 7 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Pa er version S[.,VM97 6 wbh4 WILL ,4-uow ,t,.0mWi .E {o f*---s 'C?}tv4jcf . D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. k?? p sa7s ,?- A 1W 14 ? -,?- W1 Lc- A-LLMAJ E?Gls'n? ? E??'rri?noN , }o RtMih/J . St.E'rr INq ? 0?c.(t` Su?.rF,Et? ? SAA11ra #v Aiwa V S1" Ny ACK, *Y1C t EoUIlr A4rAJr J-D DISWILIS TKC P-'A5?iN!!1 %L C'77!'f7c . 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. 00 A"AWIC-Ott- EQ%JtdkMrA r wlL-L EIIrrM 'KgSnx:_:_ RvrC CONSTYw4 or- mu s Dieu veA- . Au- wo IT w ILL- igL ioopC a q dibL>n . S Lmntj <, OF 444 w004cAJ drc-SooLf*cr. Po y"CT7' no" wmL &07 F_eA4OiV O5 ?vNt Ze?u c 1 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ) ?l No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps ? 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this Mitigation bank project? ? Payment to in-lieu fee program ? Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: w A 3b. Credits Purchased.(attach receipt and letter) Type: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: (linear feet) 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): (square'feet) 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: (acres) Page 8 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: I (acres) I 14g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: I (acres) I 4h. Comments: 15. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan WA I 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square feet) Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 9 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes ? No 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments:-No Arbio M ps-j Kt- Q yn-e a S S4; *tL B???? ? Yes No 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? ja-S % 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? EJ Yes No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: g ) f-FG7L. Aor*va-(zMmvN cwyq 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? Certified Local Government ? DWQ Stormwater Program ? DWQ 401 Unit Page 10 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? [-I Phase II E] NSW 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater mana t ? USMP gemen programs apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed ? Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ? Yes ? No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ? Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management pro rams a l (check ll th t l ? HQW ? ORW g pp y a a app y): ? Session Law 2006-246 ? Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ? Yes ? No S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No Page 11 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of ublic (federal/st l t d? ? Yes No p a e) an 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State F] Yes ? No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Yes No Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? EJ Yes VNo 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 13. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) I 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water Yes 14 No quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. U QLAn V t_ , A ktT11;- `C'1Fi S I S. /4 S (PG L CorcP ?'? ?r'tyltc - Page 12 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. PO AbbM0AJitz SEwkgE wits ?? G?NeaR- i'E77 M -cibhs pnn -C? 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? ? Yes ® No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? ? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh ? ? Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Page 13 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in ? Yes O No North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ro Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? - Applicant/Agents Printed Name T A!_ n Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the nnnlie2n} is nmuieJ-A % ti Date Page 14 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Paper Version -??? F'eA-TO ,c -_T F1CA'S1c? ?r` ¦ \r[kV North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary December 31, 2009 DWQ EXP# 09-1351 Mr. Gerald Mohn Wake County 116 Keithwood Lane Cary, NC 27511 Subject Property: 116 Keithwood Lane, Cary (PIN: 0763-00-0506) On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233) - EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM Dear Mr. Mohn: On December 30, 2009, at the request of Mr. Russ Walton, of Archadeck of Raleigh-Durham, Lia Myott Gilleski conducted an on-site determination to review one stream feature located on the subject property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). The feature is labeled as "A" on the attached maps initialed by Lia M. Gilleski on December 31, 2009. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the following: Feature "A" is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule on the property. The feature is an intermittent stream. This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days. This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any questions, please contact Lia Myott Gil leski at 919.733.9502. CHSlcbk11mg 401 Oversight/Express Review PerrrriHing Unit 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1650 Location: 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, North Cardin 27604 Phone: 919.733-17861 FAX: 919.733-6693 Internet: httpalh2o.enr.state.nc.us*wetlandsi Sincerely, n /11'/1 Coleen H. Sullins Non thCarohna AgAma!!r, An Equal Opportumty'? ARnnative Action Employor Mr. Gerald Mohn Page 2 of 2 December 31, 2009 Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey Map USGS Topographic Map cc: Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office File Copy Russ Walton, Archadeck of Raleigh-Durham, P.O. Box 364, Garner, NC 27529 1•\ 1(I "Kh?.?CS ? FYI f•' ? H? 1, S'i i µKw ? ? j ?, ,. ? !°`'j' ? ? ^ r d 1 •A ,:. n 5 `+? ? 1. 24 i ?,s L ? ? ??.+q-w? _ } ?} Y y.?_... Y y?y •. f??J? * •?' ts ? jG. ' QS~? ?ryi,Ycy? jvi i'?1 yy??,, ?.?? .3 .•.1? ? ?,i.? ?• a?`' +?: ( S" ? A ?' ?&:- -^^? ?': t. ..: l??J? .'• a ?; h? f <? .+?'.. ??13.`F Y?C .. ?,'F ? .? ,,ffyy k •{.. t; dtt .?t? }??+f ., 4 Y L .r a. ?. L7I ?'? z ? '-?`? ?','? pi " y ° a 11?FF fix' ., 1.1 ?Ib?E 'ts,r ::s ?a ? ? •. 1((Y1 ,? .,g tf', Y a.A S 2•l t? '*f+.> a y y. .,.5r - to-..? '? ?? ?? i'S .. t' ? ?? { ?i L '. y. ;?; ?•:; .n•„ " \ a?{.i ?y ?,? LG` Al ?;Jf. R .:.s' '?..-'?? Mac art y, a a+re?'"t:,?-'?i.'?? Y j,.•?,t a ?.. ? ?? 4 1 ? ?? \ +• tin ? ' '' ?,,,,' •? ;,? f`"+?"''?y' ?"?t.,,?.:,?`u ? 41asy, ?' • ? ? L •? ,.:.. •Ql. 3 s \ ?.F 1'q?? ?4N.,L ! •hi?{4 '?w}?.`y?`•, K .? q ?'V r . J?l TerraServer Image Courtesy of the USGS ?. LL ? 200M 0` , 200yd North Ca rds n;; Epn1pn, 1}i7jii•?i Plsttnar,?;,1!il Gv?tir;i Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey J?dl. V;1 ?;«t?.? Q,gKO04 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement Dah) Rovi-Md D--- Page 1 of I Send To Printer Back To TerraServer Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape ®USGS Cary, North Carolina, United States 01 Jul 1987 W AT ?Rbid r -1 _ C ,.P ftw December 7, 2007 Buffer Interpretation/Clarification #2007-002 MEMORANDUM-MODIFICATION RE: DWQ's stance on wooden-slatted decks that are attached to a dwelling and its associated wooden-slatted steps within the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Protected Riparian Buffers Problem: It has been brought to DWQ's attention that wooden-slatted decks that are attached to a dwelling and its associated steps in either zone of the protected riparian buffers have only been addressed in the definitions under 15A NCAC 02B.0202(13), where wooden-slatted decks are considered pervious. However. DWQ has concerns that not all wooden-slatted decks are high enough to allow for adequate sunlight and moisture to penetrate them to ensure that Zones one and two of the buffers are continuing to be maintained in vegetation as required in 15 NCAC 28.0233(4) and 15NCAC 2B.0259(4). Solution: Provided that the wooden-slatted deck is attached to a dwelling, minimal vegetation is removed from Zone two and no vegetaWn is removed from Zone one during the installation of the deck, if the deck is at least 8 feet (ft) in "hi to allow for adequate sunlight and moisture for maintaining vegetation beneath it and that it meets the requirements of diffuse flow for Zone one and Zone two of the buffers, then wooden-slatted decks (and associated steps) would be allowab in Zones one and two of the protected riparian buffers. However, if the deck does not meet any of the requirements listed above, it would be considered prohibited in Zone one and Zone two of the protected riparian buffers. Please note: If the deck is built within one of the 20 Coastal Counties that meets the criteria for the General Coastal Major Variance, this memorandum does not apply. Signature: Date 'A+IDL'54 c It n+a o??s - -?,?{' wri a?pYDJ? Mus Fie cece??e?l ? -Dw a- ? ?- ?; AL 401 Wetlands Certification Un4 1650 Mail Service Center, Rategh, North Carolina 27699.1650 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Style 250. Ralegh, North Carolina 21604 Phone: 919.733.17861 FAX 919.733 68931 Internet: htWih2o enr slate nc us/ncvvetlppd? Michael F. Fidel (iovcnaor William G. Russ. Jr., Secretary Ikpart?ncnt of Environment anrd Natural Resources ('oleen 11. Sullins, DirL aut Divisiun of Water Quality oiie Nu UiCaro Jim ??rtrrra?l? An Enual OoooduniWAOinnative Action Emplover - 50% Recrcled110% Post Consumer Paper . 100 yr Limit . Portions of this property lie in a SPECIAL. FLOOD HAZARD ARFA as deter- by the Department of Noising and Urban Development; however, the improvements lie outside this area. (Data taken from Book of Maps 1993, Page 57, Wake 0ounty Registry) 30' ON 30' 60' I, Larry I. Chasak, certify that this map is correct and that the buildirgs lie molly on the lot and there are no other visible easements or encnq is to my knowledge, other than :"` ?' Regis y eo6 Ll 9 r o w.' `•,_% / , E LQ51 Refere oe: Lot 11039 $Ik. Sec. Pt. 'Ph. i Map 3k: 1993 Pg. 57 Property Of GEROLD MOHN 116 KEITHWOOD -LANE CARY, N. C. tv-03-95 Larry 1. Ch", Registered land S*rvew ..1n. .... W Y??.L V._..I ... -•-« jj two r EM tea,• �$` ' � � ' i l , m .%r ati 40 rt il IVA re . 4 i o , v gM1y j �@.ielf�aliiew. �YnR n s . � r ' ' to i Wv, 14 r' f f 7i* 1F� i 1 �y..A f � *`S i` � � F'P�'��C��r/y.i°p1pI�JMG'it511S�ir 'A°hllA�• .MAlyr��`ftYlY �.+b't�lle � M! W » »\/�2 /TWX w y. .Ole ?o ro o• O C a C 0 S z v° o L E O ? .V ? c ? C. N `c?i p c Z f? L U D Q Z = Q C w W ? W Q OR O no .D w V C ? ? a R - a+ w c N C y Do ad •3 c o Cl) " L 3 ? a .. . N ). 1 LM 777'77 7; - .77 • .... k. ....... .. . - . . .. ....... ........ .. 1. ...... . .. ....... ?. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 •• .? .moo........ ... 1 ... .... . . . . . . . .? ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Q . . . . . Q. M . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . n M . . . . . ?g QQ j + 0 ; Lt) . . M 04 / . r • W N N ? N . /. a L&J N . N / Q N r t 0 N . N ^ ?1 r- ?Q . 'rte •?•! ? r? l 1100 N r- r.. l .Pi . . Q- .? / .4 .. / ?. y . z o ? Jv . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . ?I . . . . . . . . C Y oc: vA ?A,6 ? .? x N m V W U. _• = '-; 01, ?o 0 N OCR C, `p .c Vo ?o 0 o d z Q a v y % 1 Z a'w ig0 . O Z o 3 c 7 0 ? ' a 4 .? . M ? • a ? , 3 i a 00 mv i 0 u ax? -?e `;Job? w g C N C w .ro ??°+ O 3 " f N y f ` r ? ?? ",? ??'ti, ti`i"?. x'11 ? i f % ? .% ??/// ? x'; f/ ?/ ,r r M . . N M 7"'CI ?.. 1 I r Y M O? s 00 `: ` \\ Q Mi Q N N , >\ 7 Z 0 N b. : N i ' o . QO f, ,r N ? r LM sr . . v,- . .i. . . . . . . . . n . . . . . . . . . . . ? . ,?. +. . 1 N f f ': V Ol r • a s' q ? ,. z WJ 66 ?o m P d LL, c c /? \ 'N O a 40 m ?'cua+ n c Ln o Q ?' Lnow co 0 o c 5 ?' 04 ?v c o .. Z 3 ° o? ? 'Q s ? W'0 = v O L E y G V Z C yam,, m p 3 ? O I-E Z Q V can IV 0 U C Q m U U LA N t. . . . . . . N J? - . 4 . O sMd x a'F . . Rt 1;? M r . ..???J f(t 7f. ' Rt, 1 .1 i ? r• s . . . lip . . . . rj. ; M f M ; . . M f tt4f:}zr 4k ?• W al- r ( G 4 N t? ( 7o? a t;^ 7 N W 1 ._ ?i 2 Z N 1'. . . . . . . . . o IRt r O ? cl N O ? N 4' ?y?' ? t4 _ ?. a ; r b' :r N w . r: 9 . 4 . N / l Q m U 0 Nd IL V = ^ S p ?C Z a Q' ceY to >> 3 X )- N Q m V O W66 __