The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About19920359 Ver al_Complete File_19920702N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE TRANSMITTAL SLIP -q TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Planning DEM, DEHNR Room 625-D Archdale Building L; PLEASE ANSWER IJ FUN TUUN a.UM-10 ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: LTyd???O ?= fy? STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR June 26, 1992 THOMAS J. HARRELSON SECRETARY District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch - 2 1992 WETI_01)S G ?. WATER QUALITY Y-t. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 1.44 miles from SR 2210 (Wilkes Road) to SR 2283 (TIP # U-508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501) Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. This project will consist of a four-lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways. The major goal of this project is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (1982) evaluated six new location alternatives for this purpose. Other alternatives were also considered during the planning stage, including a No-Build option and various combinations of existing and new location roadway. The proposed alignment was recommended for a variety of reasons discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement for the project. In general, the alternate was found to best meet the transportation requirements in the Fayetteville area at a reasonable cost and with a minimum of environmental impact. The proposed CBD Loop is part of the adopted Thoroughfare Plan for the Fayetteville Urban area. It is considered vital to the revitalization of downtown Fayetteville and will best meet the community objectives that have been established relative to the transportation network. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer Wetland impacts for this project are summarized on sheet 14. Three impact sites were identified within a large bottomland hardwood system. An estimated 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat will be impacted by this project. Every effort will be made to further minimize these impacts by restricting fill slopes, stringent erosion control, and other best management practices. However, NCDOT recognizes the need to provide mitigation for the acreage of anticipated impacts. In 1988, NCDOT signed an agreement for operational procedures regulating mitigation debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank in Bertie County. This agreement established that project impacts totaling less than 5 acres can be debited from the bank on an acre for acre basis, based on the average habitat units per acre in the bank. Since the impacts for the proposed project are less than 5 acres, NCDOT is proposing to mitigate project wetland impacts by appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank. Attached are the permit application and drawings depicting the proposed work We are requesting that you review this for authorization under an Individual Permit. By copy of this letter we also are requesting Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. If you need additional information about this project please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at (919) 733-9770. Sincerely, Y B.J Quinn,,, P.E. cc: 4-r. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Project Management Unit Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design Mr. W.F. Rosser, P.E. Division 6 Engineer Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WA :a QUALITY CERTIFICAT?CN EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED 8Y WATER CAMA ?E=T FOR MAJOR DEYELOftq_,q-j DtPLrtmcnt of Admindwation Situ of North Cardlrst O?qutma?t Of a A,,,,y (GS 146.12) Oaoart+n?nt o(Nawral xnouress and CammunltyCoral of EKtrw-rl, Wtlmintwn otsusc (GS 113-229, 143.215.3(a)(1), 143.215.3(c), 113a-7 (33 CFR 249.320.329) Please type or print and fill in all blanks. If information is not appllable, so c6c= by piacint N/A in blank. Applicant Information Attention: B.J. O'Quinn A. Name N. C. Deoartme: t or ransoor-.ation - Division o? _?hwavs Last First Middle B. Address P. O. Dca 2 5 2 0 Street, P. 0. Box 0071--am Rala`C^ ?1ort? ?a2Olina 27611 City or Town State Zip Code Phone Location of Proposed Project: A. County Cumberland B. 1. City, town, community or landmark Fayetteville 2. Is proposed work .vithin city limits? Yes X No Cape Fear River C. Cr cek, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or nearest nave Body of water to project 111. Description of Project Purpose of excavation or fill 1. Access channel length width depth 2. goat basin length width depth 3. Fiil area See Alan sheets length widths deem A. I. Maintenance of existing project 2. New workNew Roadway 4. Other length width depth C. 1. Bulkhead length / Average distancr. waterward of MHO ?ordicse) N/A 2. Type of bulkhead construction (material) N/A D.xla oaxlt"material (total for project) 1. Cubic yards - 137R2 2. Type of material Roadway Fill E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (see also VI. A) 1. Cubic yards 0 2. Type of material N/A N A IV, Land Type, Disposal Area, and Consttuction Equipment: A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or othe- -?=ar,d? Yes No X B. Does the disposal area include any marshland, swamps or other wetlanc i cs No X C Disposal Area 1. Location N/ A 2. Do you claim title to disposal area! D. Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in E. tiow will cxcavatcd material be entrapped and erosion controlled? By standard NCDOT erosion control methods. F. Typc of equipment to be used adway construction equipment G. Will marshland be crossed in transporting equipment to project site? I- exota,n No Oi F•81 Rcr. 10/73 V- I mended. UsK of Project Am (Dcscr ) A. I. Private ___N/ A 2. Commercial N/A 3. Housirnj Development or Industrial N/A 4. 0th cr Public highway B. 1. Lot size(s) 2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water 3. Sail type and texture 4. Type of building facilities or structures Roadwav and drainage structures 5. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing N/A Planned N/A B. Describe b. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNIT`( RURAL CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synop VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality: A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes X No B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the area following project completion? Yes X No 2. Type of discharge RainfR1 1 di sr.harQe 3. Location of discharge _ Into natural drainage channels V11. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A VIII. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for work in project area, if applicable: N/A IX. Length of time required to complete project: N/A X. In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided: A. Attach a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant claims title :o the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land. B. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8h X 11" white paper (see instruction booklet for details). Note: Original drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted. C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113-229 (d))Enter date served D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below. See attached property owner sheet XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolinas approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. X11. Any permit issued purwant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli• cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel. opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing. DATE Cv Appl`- r''s Signature oiF•92 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS Rev. 10178 Jmlrl Jn 7'tT?+1t wn Drriny .? I 1 ??? r \' / 1 It Sp.eys i, ei / "IDl ?1I ?Ij r.rn l.rAef ' 1, rlofrnfpn.dlr I Doul Spann )L [? T Hr. ?O Iir u•t UsLOOd ?• Vass lrnd rll / (r?wr west Cnd 1 ??asenrw ? /f dAnF ' ?a y? 1 1 t ??'a 1 . .? .? s 1, ? Mtnc Isla • ? I .,? [ Jlsrr? ? Sv.ee s e ` `uanlt ` ?r ,.,, ^, ?- J S7 , lCan.r ' lack f 21 /?'?'+' Pmenas?l , Ulhers Pines spring C7t? lar ';?. .. P?nt•freAn [ Arrne' 'WI lullde ADerdetl, r AOU M..:i, eri.•. .,.?r.'. tr.t" J P_01u11 ,. f arett®rill a `?l . ?'r I iu N v.uJ? I ? ;I bus M P S O -'-Ti.°a afMfYHwtI,ES IF::. rA'`H O K E STE rldl ' -;,?- :..,`,Jr + 1 SJ4mllwtf - I M O N I Nonuolt S IVA"" a Ar I'MUe se Clli[l0[[* *n . - 1NotI to Ar. 'r `CC oalR A.4 Sltdmsn U.1 I' Ma.sl ti `-? "'^Derlana q RoallrsFj - DerdN 7 Raeford 1 -'r 1 1, 1?:•'' $ofe?wo 7 0 , r.? } J F ?•1LClpe Mills Ceaw C--& ,be IS _°**Cha S ' `~ Jrncn . `/ 1 PA, Aton' Lena 1 r Hamlet* SCOT I 11'M.o Jm Anl?oc Brrwi[ ! I i I-?R? r 1 I /, . Rtl ' ,? - 1^yT r,u• nPr flow 7 ley 1. , . . . - Snan v TpOtl mar `Old Rundle. r? Sp. ys 1 ' l.,?l,. _ rl.Jr I f. l , [•.Ir• fl.v •.•n.v Ammon CJ'IJnd IT 1 - grnn I nA•' ? C+:o JwelHdf?r :L3i[11?[t !I / S'.nt awf.?'?'1 •, 5] ''?`.r .•f. r 'r \ WJr.rIIJ .A v, ` I` # Est . '9lADEN JnNr ' )9 t awrn t ,'R+rfe Oak e CID sa( c', ulon 71 ,• rs, Hee1 / :Y^ LAKES f' 1 IomanarrJ M11 On •1 a s AImJ Awe 1 oA Mns/ ` , O N Wmlt\' z 1 I,? ?' , I)0 R . ?, ill 17 SLATE lAA K..r w1 Ir r - a NJflr .' - Duolrn?_ r 1. ' 17aV f•.. n /1 I , Ivnrfr` / ?ti ,s ??.. AkLu, . ? Pr .he Sl p/......,. 1'. 1.11 It I[i?raoeml t r- ).'FOREST c. "` ?• 11 ,tilt v n ?/,` 11 rl? ` C'T? BpIb CfICRev;-, n B A ?dl Q.. s N .:log s v..•.tl +J.nnJ'^ 1 J 1 trl.nr?v.: I ''4/41 . 1 .0 l' li•. . Il . ;K? . !T i' l?tDon 53 u 57 R LM• ? •? pp. Jn 0 S 10 10 39 SCALE OF MILES ONE INCH EQUALS AP?IID( I7 NILLS CtJrs ton AyH7 • , AIIOM[RKS ON[ INCH EQUALS AIPRO7 11 KIIONETCRS • CJ're1[ 0 t0 10 30 40 is I MIEE IS [QUAL TO I W9 KILOMETERS - it p \.( '1101 fi1t1 / ttj r.r / '!11 lilt 7,•0 / 1 171'• ' SSS/// / ? " /1, `III e - u/o s ? "1tof 1. 1DO.,'/ nrv t ill E'a' t` 1"1 owl ,r c _ "IK, ' ? 1 711 ? lilt r..f ` I ? ? '„ 'l erlo. iaof CITES SCALE ?.7? 1He rs 1 V 0 i 1 ] / MgES w '°°' DEG . FROJ. - rI - :? ??? ? f f MK,' ? I Eof, `I SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS 17f1 E ? 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION nA 7>w ?? ,>e. 1 "^ 1 DIVISION Of HIGHWAYS END PROJ. 1 ,• 1 CUMBERLAND COUNTY utE lu 1 PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB ,.,lu \_. 1 DI / _ 1 ' "" l?lrl ,}? r„?;- C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET I oi: 15 JUNE 92 ?. .a H n b a W T W U b!i Q O c r+ z all E? w 4. Z ? U i--i Fo+ w E O z ? w ? w ? a O ?CA? ?_ NI X-7 4 G U O ° A z ? x I ? I a O ? I , a \ 1?: 1 - ? z o coo ----±96_00 --_----- __- lf ----------_--- WILKrL5 ROAD o °o Ln N A a w G) z .? Uri W u .a ?j F4 w u. 7. v F r? o E-• O ° z A I p CF1 0 O t? W r U O C U O "" q W ? z u O O a 0 0 C x U n R r1 w E» - U z ?- - W ? NILKES ROAD s ?c L:W -? O w Cpl o = z ^ w w w w , ? C Y s l? l I F o ? ? z ? _ O p ? F" o a 1 I a W > ? U w O CSI I A C a ? F U LS) 1 v 0 1 J O L O O 1 Q M J ? 0 ti c Of >- c? a Q0 z O O - r-? ?-+ ? - + i O W P ? - w U a? 0 i + - O U CT N N `" I O 0 O O co O o 0 N W U ? z 0 z U o >' ?I T w z E. Foz $ w O w O O O U G W LI >- U G A O $- a w O Q '? z x } o Q a _ E-4 0 I ? U) Q w s? i Q U m z o ?. co x .? Li U .n F o w I r !i i w ?I I =? - ? u h o a U w x x ? I LL- - - I _ I I I I I I 00 z i z I ? I ? ? o x ? I a a o I a I I I I i o C I _ I Ln I i I _______ ___ ____ I I l I ' i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Y I I I i I ? ?I I I I I I I I w I U ? I I z I I ? I ? I H I ? I I I I ? I I I I I I 0I I a o a i i I CJ I I i i I i I ? L? I \ ? N o w C) W ?,? W E- w A LI r L i UJTJ ? ? U O - ?1 L Q ?; U O A U ? ?" A W U W cn 1 I I I u LL- Imo. I I ?. _I v I I I,11 I ; ??I I _ I I I I ? 1 1 1 j j I l I I I i I ? I I I LnI I 1 I O I I I I ? I ? . i '-n i f ?\ I I I v I I ? I z i ` I w I ° ' a ~ I I I I A 'C I ? I a I ? I z i ? ?I ? ? I I ,r I I I w u I I v ? I I ?, I ? I ? ,,I o ? De? I I ? I y I I I i F ( I I I t I I i I I i I I I I I ?I I D r ? l--1 PLI ' I - - I I °o I ° I UI A I I ? I F I I I I I I I I I U z I o N r I C. C I a I o I C ? a I lO I u I ti I I I 1 Y% l ---J- 0 Ln i J i z G z w H 0 z w Q r` co u z G I N o ?, F o ?: ? z w C a O vUi ? Q b U p0 ' ? O A I .i ? l w I ---- - 34i 6' i - I I I I II I iI I I I N`I ? I I I ?. I II i I a i I ? I w `I I I ? I I ? I a 'I I M, I I I ? I ? ;I I a I `? I I I I II ? I I 1 `I ` I III ? ?I 74 ?J I I ? I O I Go ( U I z ? I o ? I C a I 0 a i I UI c U E• 14 I J A z .a F 5 z ..7 f% In F O z w a h U G O C a Q n W a Ll- F M iU + L I ` y Ln o N w ? W F.. `?; F x n ; w Z ? a d z w; Ln j Q z w F 4 ? U Q A , A U ?' b W U 7 ? 3 C A ? 0 C n. 0 C w i > ? - I + I ? I = 1 1 I I I 1J ??? F 1 I 1 I 1 I - ' M i I ? f I I • a ?I I r. ?, I A z e; ..7 E- w 0 0 0 0 ? ? ? c W w F 9 w z LnI F O z I c.=. O m V pa S O I a W ? ti U W O .a oI a. v `? w U " x z Q o ?°c L' ri ?t j ? ? N ( i I L U N ? V ? U J I ? ? d w J ? J W Q v ? u ? N } N. O C\l a ? F o > z Lli w LnI I w Gs. Z v E-' O Q' ? z cs, GL M ? O I O Q ? U a ? ti _I I z ? UO 0 W I V' N?z I O w v I ? ?n I I ? I I I cV 'y o w N 0? w W a. ? ? o o w w ? F O A ? ? c o Z LSD -I o z O a w ?, o Gs, 0 0 ? ,• r c' _ ? > m U O w U o O w a N) co U o W I Z U Q Q 0 ? I Q I ? I ? ? Q I ? J Q I ? O ? O 0 F O ? a ? ? 03- co 0 + m 4 d- 3 Q ? ° X> a a I I a $ - o E- a, ? ?c? O ? O a? A A U z ? z w m ? U go o N r ? ti O 4 N w (3) LLJ z w a o a MI D U W LC) ° Q a ?- U) , NQc 4J c - LLJ 0 m m F+ ?-4 a t ® I w H ? a a z o 0 o as Cf) SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL FILL W ETLANDS(AC.) O.H.W.(CYJ (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 0 5591 141+12 TO NATIONWIDE IA 141+ 52 -L- 14 0.2 0 23 145 + 00 TO INDIVIDUAL II 155 + 00 -L- 404 1.6 0 1168 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET 14 OF 15 JUNE 92 PROPERTY (OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NO. 1 11 3 4 5 Cumberland County Redevel- Fayetteville, NC opment Center County of Cumberland H. Lacy Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Road Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 J. A. Holmes Estate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 John Sinclair Perry Estate 587-0 Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 D. L. Perry Estate 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 Grady it. Jackson, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 28305 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 IN REPLY REFER TO Regulatory Branch Action ID. 199202767 July 6, 1992 Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Dear Mr. Dorney: p ?6C?OdC? 1 31992 Enclosed is the application of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, for Department of the Army authorization and a State Water Quality Certification to place fill material in wetlands of the Cape Fear River associated with construction of the Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, between S.R. 2210, Wilkes Road, and S.R. 2283, Cumberland County, North Carolina, State Permit No. 8.2440501, T.I.P. No. U-508CB. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations. We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification may be required under the provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted until the certification has been obtained or waived. In accordance with our administrative regulations, 60 days after receipt of a request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on the request by September 7, 1992, the District Engineer will deem that waiver has occurred. Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Scott McLendon, Wilmington Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone (919) 251-4725. Sincerely, 4 . y e Wrig Chie Regulatory Branch Enclosure -2- Copy Furnished (without enclosure): Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 V JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 June 26, 1992 THOMAS J. HARRELSON SECRETARY District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch RECEIVED JUL 1 1992 REGULATORY BRANCH; DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 1.44 miles from SR 2210 (Wilkes Road) to SR 2283 (TIP # U-508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501) Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. This project will consist of a four-lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways. The major goal of this project is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (1982) evaluated six new location alternatives for this purpose. Other alternatives were also considered during the planning stage, including a No-Build option and various combinations of existing and new location roadway. The proposed alignment was recommended for a variety of reasons discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement for the project. In general, the alternate was found to best meet the transportation requirements in the Fayetteville area at a reasonable cost and with a minimum of environmental impact. The proposed CBD Loop is part of the adopted Thoroughfare Plan for the Fayetteville Urban area. It is considered vital to the revitalization of downtown Fayetteville and will best meet the community objectives that have been established relative to the transportation network. An Equal Opportunity/AffirmativeAction Employer Wetland impacts for this project are summarized on sheet 14. Three impact sites were identified within a large bottomland hardwood system. An estimated 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat will be impacted by this project. Every effort will be made to further minimize these impacts by restricting fill slopes, stringent erosion control, and other best management practices. However, NCDOT recognizes the need to provide mitigation for the acreage of anticipated impacts. In 1988, NCDOT signed an agreement for operational procedures regulating mitigation debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank in Bertie County. This agreement established that project impacts totaling less than 5 acres can be debited from the bank on an acre for acre basis, based on the average habitat units per acre in the bank. Since the impacts for the proposed project are less than 5 acres, NCDOT is proposing to mitigate project wetland impacts by appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank. Attached are the permit application and drawings depicting the proposed work We are requesting that you review this for authorization under an Individual Permit. By copy of this letter we also are requesting Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. If you need additional information about this project please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at (919) 733-9770. Sincerely, B, Quinn, P.E. cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Project Management Unit Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design Mr. W.F. Rosser, P.E. Division 6 Engineer Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental RECEIVED MRMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL WA'Z3 QUALITY CERTIFWATX)h EASEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER?U?- IC1?~1?T1?JT FOR MAJOR OEYEl.OP?tENT paoutment of Administration suu of North earoilna gEGULATORi Meg "tt of h4 Army (G5 146.12) 04a4rtm.nt of Nawral xasourcas ad Cammunw 3..+....rr Car" rCSrwrs. WttmincWn Olsu^ (G5 113-::9, 14321S.J(a)(1), 143.213.J(c), i13•-""7 (33 CFR -.m320-129) Pleasr type or print and fill in all blanks if information is not :opllable, w cs r by piacing N/A in oWuL Applicant Inform mon Attention: B . J . O' Quinn A. Name N. C. Decartment of ^'ransoor _a _ion - Di _?ier, e= ah«a %s Last First Middle B. Address ? 0 mac: 252v Street, P. 0. Box or <?c ?alpiC?.:or`? "3rclna 275:1 City or Town State Zio Cade Phone II. Location of Proposed Project: A. County Cumberland B. 1. Gty, town, community or landrttark 2. Is proposed work within city limits? Fayetteville Yes X No C. Crerk, river, sound or bay upon which project is located or neatest narrC:odY of water to project Cage Fear River III. Description of Project A. 1. Maintenance of existing project 2. New worl_New Roadway 8. Purpose of excavation or fill 1. Access channel length width dcadt 2. goat basin 3. Fill1rea See clan sheets length 4. Other length width dc=th width 3gt1s length width 3=th C. 1. Bulkhead length N/A Average distznca waterward of Mt-* ?crci;ne) N/A 2 TFripe of bulkhead construction (material) N/A 11 D.xlk%ctxX" material (total for proiec:) 1. Cubic yards B7RP 2. Type of material Roadwav Fill E. Fill material to be placzd below MHW (,seealso V1. A) 1. Cubic yards 0 2. Type of material N/A IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Constuction Equipment: A. Does the area to be excavated incluae any marshland, swamps or othe- -eaf?d? Yes No B. Does Inc disposal arcs include any marshland, swamps or other wetlant 'r (n No X C. Disposal Area 1. Location -NI 4 ? 2. Do you claim tale to alsposal area! N/A D. 1`111 material source if fill is to be trucked in E. How will cxcavatcd material be entracpcd and erosion controlled? By standard NCDOT erosion control methods. F Typc of equipment to be used Roadway construction ecuioment G. Will marshland be Crossed in transporting equipment to project site? I• -- :. No OZ F•81 Rev. 10/73 V. Irrtendcd'Uz%of Project As= (Descrbe) A. 1. Private N/A 2. Commercial N/A 3. Housing Development or Industrial N/A 4. Other Public highway B. 1. Lot size(s) Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water 3. Soil type and texture 4. Type of building facilities or structures Roadway and drainage structurQs 5. Sewage disaosal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing N/A Planned N/A 9. Describe b. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL CONIMUNIT`( RURAL CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Sync VI. Pertaining to Fill and'Nater Quality: A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes X No S. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the area following project completion? Yes X No 2. Type of discharge Rai nfa11 rii sr'harQe 3. Location of discharge_ Into natural drainage channels V11. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A VIII. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for work in project area, if applicable: N/A IX. Length of time required to complete project: N/A X. In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided: A. Atuch a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on Ki X 11" white paper (see instruction booklet for details). Note: Original drawings preferred - only high quality copies accepted. C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113-229 (d))Enter date served D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below. See attached orooerty owner sheet. X1. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of Norm Carolinas approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. XII. Any permit issued pursuant to this acclication will allow only the development described in this appii• cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel- opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing. . 6 * GATE `? 6` I L f t-, , L ?1 ApDI'' r''s Signaturc oiF'°Z SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MAILING INSTRUCTIONS Rev_ 1n/7%k NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Cumberland County Rodetel- Fayatteville, INC opment Center County of Cumberland 1 H. Lacy Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Road Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 J. A. Holmes Estate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 3 John Sinclair Perry Estate 587-C Windint Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 D. L. Perm Estate 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 5 Grady R. Jackson, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 8305 4 ., lR,n ?? Iwn prune v 1 1 jr r 1 .? 1 ere Sb•,nef r of , wnnSbn P-1 1w0-4 Im 1. L' S r .[ Olwr 111 rn S A,ef ^rre I 1 1 ^°D E HIwaW ? ?• Veff ? lr,Wr1, , M.M Mtfl the ,. ` ? Goa Mn 110 •rti-At`•.1 Munro' ? ^. ItjI (f?. / wede 52 .E v .e• v.nerwrfl 7, s UIIN(n Pines r. $p,ln(L)t1 w to rr ' Aeadeen . ..', rr. r•• I 1 n,l, Lou urx r .. , .'+ + I. ?+'• 0 N P-b., ll aretterlll fi'r'; TIUS a M r p S I. Jidd SITE Mr In• _ - .. ,+ ...•,rr- a l,.emwls . - Clm'toAJF •^..`? I M O N Tc, +- l 1 Mpnlrpfe 5 Iv is"m ,r l-- 40 wall r!!w 4?'rn.l ? ,CYnoe.re A,y.' _a I SI [dmin , T [ILwll .. .. a ?? TlmOdlmd ' De,ON Must on / R,rlv6 fMl,b r s r ?ognlr : 1) + . ry ?}{OpC M111S Crdn Crr«• , Ajas .0. hill! Ocksngham . l IJ '? rrecn `? varuaa' len. 1 l li 1• ?Hemle[* SCOT D ?.o•m Anuoc errdu Res esw 1` .Old r?uMrr - , _ Sn,mun T.69- Rrd ?h •.. r (.,•.• rln ...n.. Ammon Guano rid , t , 53 ? l?,elMdf?` I3i111w1? 11 Snnl rwf? `.r :'! !Tr-? [ fs •? 'T3LAOEN ? Mlnrn G,Dfqq elan ' 72 ry,` eN I Jvn LAKES rr , ., •S 1 lom,new, 'Lefon .1lrs •/,Ime flue gl As 7 :ST ?n'? I10 R B E 0 N 1117 f?2 I ST TE vtl?'e r ? bl 1 • i r I. 711 Ogbllr,? 1 ' 11,1? 1'••. ?' Ir MrCW ' HlU 1 e, ro,r •11. 11 ?. iA ?' ?? Nrf I ?h• .p i ` a it + 1L' ` [ BAOCIICJt?' 1 frrtloe?mlb?wnJlrl BJt -FOREST ?t R v ?? t /)i '1•? fle?inr B N 1to? w •`Y.. •,y4 4o nn.m?^/r ' /Srr.....^•. ' 71 ' 1 ',?1 / '//.I Y. {. ` 0 \ ` 1 \ r nae ' '•• Ndenbwn l,tDOn Till % 0 S 10 20 10 SCALE OF MACS ONE IMCM LOUALS A/v ROA IJ MMES C1mli 11 Arlle 1 SCAL( OF ¦ LOM(TERS ONE INCH EOUALS APP A 21 KILOMETERS • Cu•ns 0 10 20 30 10 11 1 MIL( IS [DUAL TO I SOL ¦ROWERS ? ? ? 11 9 r . I... ?' '1101 !1)T1 Cl, • c u ? .! '717 3L/ IrrO / ..u V .qf ,• 10 170.• •`'' n•d Jigs . ,rlr I•IN u9 to ill (RI t• 71n IM) „ 'c _ ?Lx..` ' J .ao¦ I It .. )u .A its, >a SITE Sf SCALE W EEG . PROJ. ,Ie oS 17)' \ SCALE FOR ENLAROEMENTS ur, E ? u), n» Ie 1 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1 DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS ,it, END PROJ. CUMBERLAND COUNTY 11 I ?. \ Is U111 u 1 I PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB e,u „r1 C D D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE .`_ t :. SHEET I Or 15 JUNE 92 z o .a Ql c F ° W Z Lnj Z ? ? U O C ° U ti W U O a z ? z I ? ca I ? ? I I 3 a O ? 3 I w 3 I I ? ' o Id, a O 00 vI _ wo O co u 1 1 _1 1' I 1 11 I?l?l?l I?I? ? '(.:.JI?I?III?III?II!?II!?ill?lll? I ? I WILKF-S ROAD oo Ln a ? w z w , a .a Z w! W U ? F O ? co z a Q O m U O F.: O U O G U C C p ? U W g z N ^W W O a ca Ln 0 0 } C x U N tl e W 1 1 III ? III ? ?-, j 1 Ill?lll?l'1?1?1,???III?II1? ? ? l I I1 111 I I1 1- - - - - (;J _ G:U WILKES ROAD 1 ^, 4- C\l \ \\??III?III Y N .\`?\\\ F c:a o w 0? G:7 w w ?l J ... % z r - p F o m F U Q O 1 ? ? V U G ?' a w 1 ?, z v 0 - ° o L. O u ¢ _ M l Q O w I ? O? ' 1 z 0 0 r I + i? - U5 }+q ? I - W I L O ' I O \ i - + U L-7) N r _ ? O i O ° o L i 0 Li ? , Co C\l G) F- W U F- O a; Z $ O Z ? ? O O G O ? W O In ?> ? o n O 3 I Q ?c _M a Imo- °' E-4 M E-4 Ln z w Q S Or. i Q L43- i a i z ? w R U W U? d? z o COT) ol I G z w r 1 F I I I I I e? I i i co z i z ? I G I I I I I I CD O I + I Ln I ? -------- -- --- -- Nm ,?! n LLB ~, O W ?- -? r L t 1 ` ? N ?r1 ~ O w r X11 ,? p ? ?.. O V 13 U G:] U W T i- -T I I .-I- ? -I- - I I t ? I u I I I t i I I ? I I I I I I I I i I I i I I? I I I I I I i ? I Q x I I I i I I ? I ? I I z I I ? ? I I I F' I ? I I I \ ? ? I I I I CD I I o c. i I ?? I I I I I I ?I? l ? •? i C\j s w ?. s z N F -- Ln r o U C" L•J U ? _ w u7 U S U F CD ' 1 c? l I I I I 1 i I I 1 1 1 I ? I j I I I? I I ? ?. I I I I 1 i t I I I I I I ? I I LQ\I 1 Q" 1 O 1 ? O ? ? I O I I i I z ? z ? I I ? I W 0 I I ? \ I I r a ?' I I C I , ?/ I l a; I i I W u I I W I I j ?, ? l y I c .. •I o ?? I ? I I I `?) I I I I I i I I ? I I I I I I I I n? I I I ? I ` m z 1 ? C\j L.Lj v T _ r 4 ? H a p? U O 03 Z I - p ( a I I o i + l+ ? + I I I Ol I ? I I ? I II I UF E- I I I NI I I I Q- I I I I I I _14 I I + ?I o i Ln I I I c I z - U ? I I w? I I z ? I ?I > I I o a ? I I ? l a w I ? 7 O j ?? ' I ? I r./ G I I I :r, ? I - I O o f J I ? .I l a c. i I ; I `? 11 I I0 I I I ? I I ? II I I I 1 ? 'I I I i?, ,I LL- W rte-- ?- ^ i z !I o I i w Q o T L LA l z <0 ?I . z w Q O ?. c. O O 1 ?j r. A '.3 'J U U O O G G ? G U 0. p W \? z U V w a N G G yy ON Y? a I I I > ? . l + I I I I I _ ?I I I I - I ? I I _ ?;I I ^ ? z I I I z i ° I r,? I I ti I ? I I ? o„ I / I I I ? IU V)'' UI + r M U ; . Ln ?. U E- 'a ,c O ? r N G) ? `-+ o co Z u F. w o --5 A N e L F o c ? z I ? o Q p U Q O I o ? o ? v OI U c U W ? I z Q n ?° I ? c L i j I v c ? ? N I N r <J ? I ? v W ? i ? w 0. Q ? ` I J J l? ? I Q Q v ? ? O O ? ? O I I I N O ? O o, V • 7. ? Nm ?-, . J ?, F cn ? ;. o ;r > LLJ z .? w z r LnI I F Q ° z cs, Q ? ? V O w ? ? o a I ? U ? G a F ? z U I ? 4 w C Q d? c ?? , ?W I I ? I e ? Lt Q Cf- w ? U J N" n Q? ?1 V 0 Qr 0 co l? O 4 J 0 Z e J J 0 ?tl C?l o - - - - ? w - -= W ? a w E- o ? ? o z w . 0 O w ?. U o ? ? n . ? w ? NI . ti D G C b ? W J Q LLI J e U h e O v N W 0 in 1j o O: O O + + ?- Q a o o ° = w ?: cr- a I I $ - o F .r cn w ? ? z -- o z o> ? U z z o U w U u a ?, ti o ? C" w w -? w ?. a `? U N Q) W D o Ft7 LC) ? I ? U U I i E l a s >? U) CO N CO *4 a Z ;9q 0 i I T rr ?? VJ - O Gi R1 t?I z O O O (7) co SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL FILL WETLANDS(AC.) O.H.W.(CY.) (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 0 5591 141+12 TO NATIONWIDE IA 141 + 52 -L- 14 0.2 0 23 145 + 00 TO INDIVIDUAL II 155 + 00 -L- 404 1.6 0 1168 3.1 0 6782 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890 IN REPLY REFER TO July 7, 1992 Regulatory Branch Action ID. 199202767 Mr. B. J. O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch Division of Highways North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Reference your application for Department of the Army (DA) authorization to place fill material in wetlands of the Cape Fear River associated with construction of the Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, between S.R. 2210, Wilkes Road, and S.R. 2283, Cumberland County, North Carolina,' State Permit No. 8.2440501, T.I.P. No. U-508CB. On February 6, 1990, the DA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) signed a memorandum of agreement (MOA) establishing procedures to determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. To enable us to process your application in full compliance with this MOA, we request that you provide the following additional information: a. Permits for work within wetlands or other special aquatic sites are available only if the proposed work is the least environmentally damaging; - practicable alternative. Please furnish information regarding any other alternatives, including upland alternatives, to the work for which you have applied and provide justification that your selected plan is the least damaging to water or wetland areas. b. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical steps to minimize wetland losses. Please indicate all that you have done, especially regarding development and modification of plans and proposed construction techniques, to minimize adverse impacts. -2- c. The MOA requires that appropriate and practical mitigation will be required for all unavoidable adverse impacts remaining after all appropriate and practical minimization has been employed. Please indicate your plan to mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of waters or wetlands or provide information as to the absence of any such appropriate and practical measures. This information is essential to our expeditious processing of your application and it should be forwarded to us by August 6, 1992. Also, a copy of this information must be sent to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management to enable them to adequately evaluate your application for a Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Scott McLendon, Wilmington Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone (919) 251-4725. Sincerely, G. Wayne Wright Chief, Regulatory Branch Copies Furnished: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV Wetlands Regulatory Unit 345 Courtland Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Mr. John Parker Division of Coastal Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 r. John Dorney ivision of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 CO N. C. DEPARTDIENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATE 1-2o q'? TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM. OLOG. Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Planning DEM, DEHNR Room 625-D Archdale Building ? PLEASE ANSWEN ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: 4 ? 4b --)I l T 1,992 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ?7ATER At DSySOCTICN P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 JAMES G. MARTIN July 17, 1992 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GOVERNOR THOMAS J. HARRELSON WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR.. P.E. SECRETARY STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRA? OR District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 2.54 miles from existing NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) TIP # U-508CA and U-0508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501 Dear Sir: Reference is made to our application of June 26, 1992 and your letter of July 7, 1992 requesting additional information about the proposed extension of the Central Business Loop in Fayetteville. As you are aware, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to construct a new section of the CBD Loop from existing NC 87 south of US 301 to East Mountain Drive (SR 2283). For construction contract purposes this project was split into two sections (U-0508CA and U-0508CB), and permit drawings prepared separately. Our application from June 26, 1992 only included information for U-0508CB. Since there is no interchange at the intersection of SR 2210 and the proposed road, neither section of the project will stand alone as a single and complete project. Consequently, we are submitting a new application which includes details on both sections to be reviewed for authorization under an Individual Permit. This letter will also demonstrate compliance with the memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army which established procedures to determine compliance with mitigation requirements under Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer M The major goal of this project is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. The new Loop is designed as a four-lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways. Portions of this road have already been built. The section of the road currently proposed has a long planning history. The planning process is documented by an Administrative Action-Final Negative Declaration completed in April 1979. NCDOT completed a Reevaluation of this earlier document November 25, 1991. These documents analyzed several different alternatives including No-build, postponement, use of existing roadway, and new location options. The no-build and postponement options were rejected due to the anticipated traffic needs of the Fayetteville area. The use of existing NC 87 was rejected for several basic reasons including incompatibility with area transportation plans, safety, cost, and impacts on existing development along the roadway. The new location corridor was selected primarily to tie in with existing and proposed roadways. At the present time, the sections of the CBD Loop north and south of the proposed section have already been built, thereby fixing the endpoints of the current project. The proposed alignment follows what was found to be the least damaging, feasible route. Consequently, to meet the goals of this project, there is no practicable alternative to crossing the wetland areas within the project limits (existing Nc 87 and East Mountain Drive (SR 2283). It is NCDOT's position that this complies with the first specification of the MOA that the proposed work be conducted in the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. There are unavoidable wetland impacts on both sections of this project. Project U-0508CA extends from existing NC 87 to SR 2210 (Wilkes Road). There is one large area of wetland impact on this section, involving 8.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. Project U-0508CB extends from SR 2210 (Wilkes Road) to SR 2283 (East Mountain Road). Wetland impacts for this project are summarized on sheet 14 of 15. Three impact sites were identified, totaling 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. The total project will require impacts to 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. The MOA also requires that all appro be taken to minimize wetland losses. The minimize wetland encroachment by limiting possible. During construction, stringent best management practices will be used to effects. priate and practical steps NCDOT has attempted to fill slopes to the extent erosion control and other further minimize adverse 1 The NCDOT recognizes the need to provide mitigation for the acreage of anticipated impacts in compliance with the MOA. In our prior application, it was proposed to debit the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank in Bertie County. In light of the additional impacts associated with U-0508CA, the use of this bank is inappropriate. NCDOT's mitigation staff has initiated the process of identifying suitable mitigation areas. This has included coordination with government agencies. To date, several potential sites have been located in Bladen and Cumberland Counties. However, they require additional field checking before a determination of suitability can be made. The NCDOT welcomes and encourages the assistance of your agency in this matter. The NCDOT is prepared to commit conceptually to mitigation guidelines for 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. These guidelines have been coordinated with your agency for other NCDOT projects, and are enclosed with this application. Attached are the permit application and drawings depicting the proposed work. We are requesting that you review this for authorization under an Individual Permit. By copy of this letter we also are requesting Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. If you need additional information about this project please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at (919) 733-9770. Sincerely, O'Quin P.E. cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Project Management Unit Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design Mr. W.F. Rosser, P.E. Division 6 Engineer Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental APPLICATION t FOR PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR FILL - WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION ESSEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT Otpartmtnt of Adminlttratlon Sure of North Clrollna 0.9trtm<nl of th4 Army (GS 14612) 04putrmnt of Nlturrt RftOVrC9t ?r.1 Communky3-kr-+^I Gxvsof E"V"4rt, Wilmington Otsusc (GS 113-229, 143715.3(x)(1), 143-215.3(c), 113--A (33 CFR 209.320-129) f Icau typ< or print and rill in all blanks. If Inforntation is not appll"blc, so rr-'c-r*c by (lacing N/A in blank rATTN: B. J. O'Quinn, PE, Assistant: L'ranch Manaqer, Planning & Environmental Branch 1. Applicant Information A. Name N. C. Depar.tmenL of Ti-anspot-Lal_ion - Division oC Ili.911way5, B. Address P . O . Street, P. O. Box or 4--c Raleigh, North Carolina 77611 (9191 7z3-9770 City or Town State Zip Code Phone II. Location of Proposed Project: A. County Cumberland k F a y e t t e v i l l e 0. 1. Cty, town, community or landmar 2. Is proposed work within city limits? Yes X No C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is Iocalr_d or nearest narx; xKdy of water to projccl Cape Fear River III. Description of Project A New wcxl roject 2 1 Mai a tin t f i X . . . g p n en nce o ex s B. Purpose of cxcavation or fill 1. Accrss channel Icngth width drpth 2. Boat basin Icngth width dclrth 3. Fill area See Drawings Icngth width d-pth 4. Other Icngth width d-pth C 1. Bulkhead Icngth N/A Average disunce watcrward of MIPA :xicx-clirsc) ' N/A 2."Type of bulkhead construction (material) N/A D. Excavated material (total for project) 42,110 2 Type of material Cubic ard 1 Roadway Fill . . y s E. Fill material to be placed below MHW (scr- also VI. A) Cubicyards 2926 below OHW 2 Type ofrnatcrial 1 Roadway Fill . . IV. Land Typc, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment: A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or oche: -.:nrar,d? Yes No _ B. Does lt,e disposal arca include any marshland, swamps or other wellanc res No X C. Disposal Area N/A 1. Location Do you clairn title to disposal arca' N/ A 2 . 0 Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in E. Ilow will cxClvalcd material be cnlrappcd and erosion controlled? By standard NCDOT erosion control methods F. Typc of eclitipmcnl to be uscd_Roadway Constructuon Equipment G. Will marshland be crossed in transporting cquipmrnt to project site I' captain - Last First Middle Bor. 25201 X No V. fntcrrd:d Us-,, of rm!cct Am, (P?crlbe) A. 1. Private N/A 2. Commcrclal N/A 3. 1iousint Dcvcloprncnt or Industrial N/A 4. Other State Highway for public use 0. 1. Lot size(s) N / A 2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water 3. Soil type and tr_xture 4. Type of building facilities or structures _ Roadway and drainaqe structures 5. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing 'v/ r% Planncd Q. Describe 6. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL COMMUNIl-Y RURAL CONSERVATION OTHER (Sec CAMA Loea an-d Use Plan Synopsis) VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality: A_ Docs the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? Yes No B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the area following project completion? Ycs X No 2. Type of discharge Rainfall Runoff 3. Location of discharge into natural drainage channels VII. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A VIII. List permit numbers and issue dates of previous Department of Artily Corps of Engineers or State permits for work in project area, if applicable: N/A IX. Length of time required to complete project: N/A X. In addition to the completed application form, the followirtr items must be provided: A. Attach a copy of the decd (with State application only) or other instrumcnt under which applicant claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said properly, then forward a copy of the dccd or other instrumcnt undcr which the owncr claims title plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project oil his land. 0. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8% X 11" white paper (sec instruction booklet for details). Note: Original drawings preferred • only high quality topics ac-ceptcd. C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or certified mail or by publication (G.S. 1 1 3-229 (d))Enter date u_rved D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. Such owners have 30 days in which to submit cornmertts to agcncres listed below. See attached property owner sheet XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolina?-> approved coastal niariagcmcnt program and will be conducted in a manner corlsistcnt with such pregrarrt. XII. Any purnit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel. opmcnt activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearInF. DATC I h C/ Agi licant's Signature ,ne•le M•r{ 1 Ir / f G.-. ' , 1 t'. Sa•?tl ? r•./ / ?' ?1 Sr•^.\ 1 f. Y t, M It Vogl (•a•r well ll4 . ' ?'1M^'^' /N;.: - ? G 41"o" Sin 19-4 % fc/ / ?. vt F w.••./1 • l1NM Rltu '"?""/ C? U A N I•-•t 4t..1 'r• If,lit I,w....ll • 1' E,7ecttrln ? .r ??: M .7 yC I ' me-cm I SITE '\N _ 0 K E ry list I M O N 14..,116141 A.,?..,,N / • rr"r \•• t . ._ .._ y .?.. ....1, ?«.« hi" 11 f +el«? Mills , 1?'• cto• (MM II.HH^ r I 4-1 bj,w I ? 1 s• , w.?lT ? ?. r • p(Sm M 'j d ,. r •? r.Alewi 1 W ' n 1 SCOT 1.r.^• ' ?C •l T' lmltl ?Ow mw,&t 1- . rl.a SI••^n r• I It?t• ` .\ •`+M I .L ' I ....... Are.w.•• . \ (,ylfd ;t?a M•I( ' ; \ ( \I 7I w11N11 `^ ' \•1 wp.tf OM I ' •'• .11 - I MI 'bLAOEN ,. 1 ' t.IT I 17 ra?M.a R LAKES ' r? \ 1 1 wl.kn+ 1 1 I\ /, R B E O N 1, 7 sf iC rr,•If nor l... we N1 11 ?nMr•F?_ 1 \ t mailr ' t ,..t 11 , MAI?t I.1• `rt -F REST `?. % \ 11 italtt tts+' B(..,.. to Q. , 1 sn6t 4 1. RtYi•••r ` r 1 welly O S 10 SC LE OF Mk(S Dm( MCM (0UA(s A/?MOS II mills rJN I.. SCPA a wKO-KIIofS oat .CM (UUA11 A"110S II wr(0.crus 0 I0 79 J-0 -40 to I rill IS INAL TO I tN KILO"! TICS 1 1 '• ' L , :1 s4) t t ,11 IY• I>w 1 ? - BEG. PROJ. .111 111: i .10 7N N Irl, L •)? U11 . 1161 UV w Ir.• ) I.o rrtr IW SITE _ p scwle END PROJ. •, p , ?,;, • ?;),?1-rr??-?---T-=? W alb 1 SCALE FOR 1TN.M'EMEM7S I ull E I ' "- , ul• i/` HICI DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION '"DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 'r" CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8/2140301 U-1j08CA C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE lilt rrt• is SHEET--.I.--OF----- 12 - 91 1-i H MA TGf1 L /NE A x o Q j c? ?C 7G = E v ? w oC S U o -? I E-. ?c-a Ca.. ? 1 Cx. C =x o 1 rte.. O ?c -?? I T J N O G-- ? w C." OO I a. o N I w ?-, s F- ? 1 ca y ? U I U C" C:!b - A ti w U p m u1 S CL U V] 8 o1 I V I 1 I ~ 0. \I N 1 A iJ `'1 II ? I \I V 0 Q 'm cl? , - o =- Z C7 o? z U o I ? f -? ?s Cs. I r__ o o - 1 Oa. p Z Y ? 1 J N O O - C1. I n. w c.0-1 r m s p A - . y s ? ~ U I 1 ?--. ca w o L- - A w C-> o - c?t z X n- U c? MA TC,41 L INZ- B w J z a d 0. 'l. P7 0 z - ,`l H Q -3 Q1 v, z z ? E-- oC s v o ? I ' lf O -C ter- ?-+s. ,`v c- a. z o C/1 J w m N co O p 1 A y •---4 = v C.> W o E- ' U A p m C.2 Cy U c? MATCH LINE E" u • ti U?U G 31Y/ 7 1-1-7.1 VW - MATCH L //VE I v I V / h ?-? F%v;1_/1 wE71ANOS 114117- F?m DENOTES FELL IN WETLANDS SCALE in - W FLAN VIEW END CONS T. S TA . I /. I 129+4 I I l I M. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUNBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT B.210501 U-508CA C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE sHEET_ 7-OF_16_ 12-91 Fr ?ll t? a ? . t, u a d o. Z w A W 2 v v I o H Q - CD - y- ?N Il H XfIW o ?- CV - - c.l :;A= z ca E- W C-> o ?.. c=s l z O Z o J N c? Q I C" C-3 ? ?.-. = x C o l l I A }- ?-a A =:P. U U W "? 1 Ca E W I V =Z= O ? C3-. C= -_Q z C-> C!1 I ? LL U - I V V W I Q I U I O 1L - H CL I 0 > Q :2 J a I I J ? I o r? z ? - a I J w I (V - W I ? I O U I x m o O o I a < -•C E-. J] U CO .a rn •---? 1 MAT CH LINE - 0 - °t: -4 E•- I U) ?C U U C ¦1 U a s v o •¢?I I ? ate. Cs. a O z o -.- - 1 z I U ? z 7 N CD • fr•» Cl ?-. W C ] m oo O oOI I I? r _ w / r--a Y E-- J Z .'i U w o HI I LL - c? ca ? o w m w Q co - _J Q W I - c Q O u ?- cl: O J u o - z Q J r_l t? ~ W I l F? I I ? ko I O I O U ? O ° .n o ? LCD -V- 3N1-1 HDiVN - 0 0 0) CC) M ATCH LIN E - C - M o ? >- ?? =? - C/1 2 S C7 `L = ? C w x l cs?. o z -.- z • Y Ln o -c ?.- ?• :? v - ? O J cx N - a.. O I E-- a ?-. cn c.a m oo O I 3 A ?- = U 1 O - •-. ca v w o F-. LD J U- c-> o w :? x o-.. U c?a Z 0 N - w 0 Q CV Q - ? ? r J Q na ° ~ o J V) 0 z Q J \? T ` H J - ? o ? cV - w o w I x o o a "' - 9- 3N1 71 HC1bN - O O O o 0 Cn co M TCH INE _ E ? E-? _n °? '- Q v 00 o V• .a I } N D-CV C.11 x s c- c? z U o ? I lt.. c?... O z o -+? Lo I ? I ? ? J N O v ?-» w . W C!l m CK=P O I p ClJ I v r-. s ?- ? E-- U -3 - I 1 ?-? U A W ?s D E-. W p V - O 4 m :.s3 X 1 J lt.. z Cz.. U cn Ld r n - 0 cV cc > - Q o cc Q a o - H N Ln J cV - L o o z Q o H O X - H w o { Z pie tr7 /0 O O U O ? - D - 3 N171 HXVN - O O 00 c o Q? o Q _ E-. lA CDO -4 c? ?- o ?• N - ca- ::'M 4 H c? ?G U o -? ?I Cs. ? o - J N O - - E-- O cr-, .-. w oo C1 O I I ci. C!1 m o M I G1 y ?-. U v w a I E-» U A ?i p m Cz) :zl ? ? CL. V X cn eo soso-n 80A 1JN83d SO N y-l13M 33S 3N I l H DiVVr O) CV - l I U w ?n ' a V ? oo _ w c11 a I Q w a J ° ° _ w `fl a x O U ? o U - 0- 3 N I ? HJiVrj - O co EARTH QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.2 FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2925.9 TOTAL FILL 35327.7 C.Y. AC. C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAIIH AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS 1 Aldolphus Turner Estate C/O Lillian I. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6288 2 3 4 W. Greg Sutton Mary Sutton Estate 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 28305 C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305- 5273 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1829 un,n,n -rr+rt?*nt wn prrn?v 1 , ?') ' 1.\/ -.? 1 [le Sw•^t, roes / ^ "Im N- , I lr post Sw?^t, _ ? 1/ 5 . r,onnsnn.dl< 1 4. , rk,o e, s trod r# ` Ili r'r^L,sl.ood \ V,ss (rw«y ' ak e<rtw west (nd - ?A 1 \ ` 1 f 'God lln Sulr t 1 ? . 1 [ ?L.? Mtn<?tln , I _ { sl t,r•, ?Yan.r itc„ / I• ( ?, / w.d< pt ?F i, ' 'L' vmenw ?l utRetn Pins - Spun[ lk? 10 r `` A C U: <- „ Green 1 K.rnr? ..01 ?•rr... .r .r..', v.r+ } / 61 ;1?11IP' c.`+• ADtr tt . ran W. '.c r,neDl„n.•do Ire ?a}?ettQrill ; t'?: M P S O N ar»., nr tnEt m SITE = cry` "Cr 5 1 Cllntoa rY lrose r ? Nand« A.,h y..ile • ?. • I M O N Mpn _ IN!DII F,n At.Q IM1S Cvnbal.n r Sl edman , , r I wll I r .. M,nt / ?• Irn.D eJ.nd •cl ,. ?? Derdrl l • R,elad .I? 1 Ra J•r" 1 (:°' +tes<Cwo r - + 'A, 10 p? h41IIS r Crd,r c"" .[:?. .? ?aanu I I)II 1= b, \ , t XIn1! t , OE1roQha 1 , .` Du 1 ,/ var lmT Le^• Ilf t* 1r , - r «ncn , 1 L , lunWer 11 ?'f l' I' Hdmltl* SCOT D .l1, [r An' Alt roc Bnd/e r? 1 nlr _ - - '\' 'ej / t.l, •1`.3 L?T.r,?,V r,r r?pw? InVo )A ` t `Old trundler 1? , l Sn tnr.,n, Tobarma 1? rl,r,.+ u rl.,. J I \ \ ( L.,S n:v •r"n.v Ammm Gul,nd RrA S1i •?• grn,.,r ' r ?j 1 I ,r,.- , ?? lw tl NrlE?\`1 , S,rnl l,rl?, 5? .'•??`?_ `j. La Owl \ E) st C 13LApEN '= = rrrlr 19 11 ,NrnD Wt r,rOp 1 GIDs4 _.5. < (s. [ 1 „Im 77 re, HeN^ LAKES r' t `' 1 Io.n ' uw+ ., . .rim, flwe 1 ' - • , r' . a x 1 0 ,oN s - r ) wnlte ; [ STAiE I' r 101 , t t, 71? .0ubllrf?,.. I ?. t ll,r? r,.. ,,. t IINI? r I ,Pr .he \IVA,e, McCUI 's1• I + 11 ,tM 1 Jt• ,m s •? c AJ ;,.^.,.,, r ,I it 2 ,(i,atoctntwn r <,. { 'EST tJA0C116F1*' ; 1 l3 A 61 Q. Fy ) N :to Ville t ?? I ... , •?• ? . fl e Vimy t ? , ? P.n ., ? H,rnM• t ? r Irn r 1 .1 I 17 t , ? h0 \? I,11 / 17? %1 , yl,dtnAwn (. e / 1 S/ l,sDon 0 5 t0 20 3 SCALE Of MILES ONE IKH [WAES APPROA 10 MUS Ct,rl.mn Kelly I SCALE Of KILOMETERS CNI[ INCN EWAES Al" RO, 2E 1110111 1[p$ . f,rrels 0 10 20 )0 10 tl 1 VILE IS EQUAL TO 1 tit KILOMETERS II ,t+ a tu. .,?. '[lei mr 'ur "" uv ),) 1Ilr l i - 2w ?. I nw f rllr I urs r. ~ '' uu ,ra o ? ,{C I Alit 2 e ,<V rpor } BEG. PROJ. „>r n, r • M END PROJ. 10. Lies I b ' SITES SCALE t 0 1 2_ 0 __ . Mllti SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS EI t n? ,s I N. C. DIP'r.OI TRANSPORTATION 1 DIVISION 01' HIGHWAYS CUMBULAND COUNTY 1 1?' ?• t PIZOJI?C7' 8.2«0501, U-508CR s r C B D 1,0012 IN FAYETTEVILLE s1-1LE'r I OF 15 ?. JUNE 92 N o_ w a W z h/ r?l o .. U ° Q a z LI w k- O -0 00 z u. A ur) cc 0 0 w U S U O A ,?..? U A a as W ? A - z-. U vxi P'" to a H 4.4 C7 o ?I 00 _ z 1f - - - ` - `YILKES ROAD C ° 0 C\j A o a ? u, a W z Z o F, F o z ?. O Ld w p O m U a ? ? ti ? MI w U O A Ph, Q Q ?, a U U W ? z a 0 O a cv N O CD i i x i H R W - J w W1LKrR°A° C\j ?C w O w N (3) .a w W - Z x x ?. U A z c o ? Ll E^ p O a z a O - a O ) m ? U w Q ? A U O ? 0 A ?q E? I 1 U z . U W w x a v OM o O Q 0 Lli o' z O - r4 ?? y` I + I PLI I I - w ? w I j -+- - O U N I _ x I O 0 O O 00 o 0 C\j - ? W -- l W co ,w»» a x ? ? w 0 U U o z? LI) I a F o z w o w H a o E-' ? n V a in w g t1? O 3 ? v A a ?' w O $ z U x ° Q + ° o Q U) - i Z W Q w s ?. U H W F z M o N ? r ?• h' F W ? t U , W F °C o w z x u, Q Cs Lc) h CN7 c i O E-- r" cn C? O Q f C? ?1 U W x x U E? 00 00 Ln _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I i -- I I I I I I i z J I z ? I ? I O O o i ? i a I I I I I o ? I I - I I - I - i -?- I I I I I I - i I I ? i I I I ?1 I I I I I -- I - i I I I I 'i _ U I I i I I I I I I i I I - a I I I I I I ? ? I ? I I I I I u ? I I z I I i? I I N I ? I ? I I ? I I I o I I I I Q I ?I a I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DI _- Lr? G) o w r a U, w W u w ??r r Y--1 I+1 i! % 11 x Q Lnl a ? _ Q U nn W U o Q a J U W x ' I I? l '? I I ? U I I I I ? I I I I I ? I I ? I ? I ? I I I ? Ln I ? I I i I ,I I I ? o I I I I ? I I LL _ O I I o I i I I I I _ I 00 z i I I z i I I I ? I ? ' I a. o o ? I I ° -c 1 1 ? a °' I Q I ? I ? I - I ? I W I ? a. I ? ? ? I I , > a I I w I I I uo i a I I I ?? I I I I I I ? I ? I I I I I I I I I N o O) r W r5. PO n U ° -1r, Lnl n W CY. CI, ci E- o co l /1 w v? ?' ! -! A o Q a u O U Ca U w I __-- ?{- - y I ; I I I ,. I H I ? ! I I I I II `?,I I \ II ? I a \, I + _ I o `0 I j i x I z i - v I z I ? k?l I I I o a I I g I a °? b Il i x a l a I I I a l i I ?, I I _- t o x l -1 'I; I l a CL I t I I I I\ I w ?,I ?? I x I I ?, ? \I " I I I I? ?? ?? I ti I I I ILL- " o G=, ? a, x U a O p Uri E-4 ti Q ? U ?? A U x x a 0 A ? c4 a 0 x a I I I y ? . l ? I I I w ? _ I I I ?' I I I l I ? I -'i I _ _ ? I I -? I I - - I ?n I I co - U z ? I ? I I -I U z o I J a I ? ? I c x o ? ' I I ?, F " I ? a o I I - I - x I '" I o , ", I I ?' I ?I / M + I? i IU I I o Ul ?I a , Ln 1 ? ? ? - - - I - I -- - - - ?----? ? _ } - I . - _ b Lr) A U ?' D Q Q Pc W O ? N 0 i i i I? O co 0 U z o w N G) o ? x z a o w W ? LI F O a w Ca U o O ?_ A c ? U 00 U ti O 0. z S w Q ? U w O O W x rr) U1 u. U V w 3 J ? J I`' J _J 11J CJ tv/l' J Q N a a N ?.` 0 \n iLJ 4 I Q? d ?w I I ? QO R J ?J Q J l1, O Cf- Q- o w N H C) ?, A ra o o ., :> W z l E- O a w u o Z ? ? a ? U U ti O ? a A U L.n ?. O =I x iu Q ? v N w O N z N O w N w w a LiJ as z ? W z ° x a z? x a -I o c z .a E4 O U o O a ? ? ti ra NI O w > U O fa U A 0. ? W 4 I) ? aC ? `?VI I O n I ? 1 \ I V J v I e I J v N I ? p co o CD o ?-O O + Q o o ? ° ``' a I I I - $ x z?? x o o 0 A? U Q z ? ° z w u u o d ?, u ° a a . z a 8 A ?a v N W z -? Ln o w Ln Cl. i I LLJ I W o ? I i Cf) GO m a I Z p y, P4 i ® I v? i W F z o o o o 4 - SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL, FILL, WETLANDS(AC.) O.H.W.(CY.) (Cy.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL 0 5591 I 131 + 00 -I,- 404 1.3 141+12 TO NATIONWIDE 0 23 IA 141+ 52 -L- 14 0.2 145+00 TO INDIVIDUAL 6 1 0 1168 11 155 + 00 -L- 404 . 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT.OIF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERL AND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501. U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE' SHEET OF 15 JUNE -92 PROPERTY OWNER NAbIL AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO 1 2 3 4 5 OWNER'S NAME Cumberland County Redevel- Fayetteville, NC opment Center County of Cumberland H. Lacy Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Road Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 J. A. Holmes E.tate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 John Sinclair Perry I'state 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 D. L. Porry E.t.te 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 Grady It. J.ck.on, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 28305 ADDRESS N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FA1'ET'I EVTLLE SHEET 15 OF 15 JUNE -92 IL 4 . FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands Mitigation Proposal The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will insure that the mitigation site will exceed the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). NCDOT will document, using monitoring wells or visual observation, that this hydrology parameter has been met. Locations and numbers of monitoring wells, if utilized, will be established through coordination with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel. Installation of any wells will take place prior to planting. After grading of the site is completed, wetland tree species such as river birch (Betula ni ra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overcup oak (Quercus 1 ry ata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii), water oak (Quercus ni ra) and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will be planted on 8 foot centers to compensate for forested wetlands removed along the segment. Species compositions will be approximately equal. If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. NCDOT will be required to seed the mitigation area with grass immediately after grading to satisfy soil erosion regulations. Fertilizer and lime will be added to the area at this time. NCDOT will reapply these additives if it is deemed necessary prior to planting of the seedlings. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location o these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. { - ¦ NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper elevation and grade, get permitting agency approval on the elevation 2. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality *river birch (Betula ni ra) *green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) *overcup oak (Quercus 1yr ata) *swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) *water oak (Quercus nigra) *black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) * If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with Corps personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. 3. Coordinate hydrologic sampling with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers** ** Hydrological sampling will take place periodically throughout the growing seasons until adequate hydrological conditions are met B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition " < M 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: Information from monitoring will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event - no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12% of the growing season) - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility tie A/.IZ o s State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. IMartin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary December 10, 1992 Acting Director Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Subject: Revised 401 Certification for Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359, COE # 199202767, TIP #U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County On 30 July 1992, the Division of Environmental Management issued Water Quality Certification Number 2766 for the abovementioned project.. According to your 3 November 1992 letter, DOT has recalculated the wetland impact to total 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood forest and 1.24 acres of ponds. Water Quality Certification Number 2766 is hereby modified to reflect these revised wetland and pond acreage. We will also need to be kept informed of any further progress concerning wetland mitigation for this project,. This information can be directed to Mr. Ron Ferrell at 733-1786. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, reston Howard, P.E. Jr. cbdrev.ltr cc: Wilmington Distric Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. Ron Ferrell Mr. John Parker ' REGIONAL OFFICES Ashcvillc Fa?e Pt -dTea 1 F121Wsville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephonc 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportuniry Affirmative Action Employer Two State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 Nor<h Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. William V,'. Cobey, Jr., Secretary December 10, 1992 Acting Director Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Subject: Revised 401 Certification for Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359, COE # 199202767, TIP #U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County On 30 July 1992, the Division of Environmental Management issued Water Quality Certification Number 2766 for the abovementioned project.. According to your 3 November 1992 letter, DOT has recalculated the wetland impact to total 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood forest and 1.24 acres of ponds. Water Quality Certification Number 2766 is hereby modified to reflect these revised wetland and pond acreage. We will also need to be kept informed of any further progress concerning wetland mitigation for this project,. This information can.be directed to Mr. Ron Ferrell at 733-1786. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Howard, P.E. Jr. cbdrev.ltr cc: Wilmington Distric 04eston rps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney iir. Ron Ferrell Mr,.. John Parker REGIONAL OFFICES Asheville Fa?etPttwr.Feal Fh?1??YLSsville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 9191395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer C CnS1'W W ti State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street 0 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary December 10, 1992 Acting Director Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Subject: Revised 401 Certification for Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359, COE # 199202767, TIP #U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County on 30 July 1992, the Division of Environmental Management issued Water Quality Certification Number 2766 for the abovementioned project.. According to your 3 November 1992 letter, DOT has recalculated the wetland impact to total 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood forest and 1.24 acres of ponds. Water Quality Certification Number 2766 is hereby modified to reflect these revised wetland and pond acreage. We will also need to be kept informed of any further progress concerning wetland mitigation for this project. This information can be directed to Mr. Ron Ferrell at 733-1786. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, pre-stonn Howard, P.E. Jr. cbdrev.ltr cc: Wilmington Distric of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. Ron Ferrell Mr. John Parker REGIONAL OFFICES Asheville 174eFttrleal F121??fL?sville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street - Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobe-y, Jr., Secretary July 30, 1992 Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 Clean Water Act, Proposed CBD Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359., COE # 199202767, TIP 8.2440501 Cumberland County A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. Acting Director of the Federal # U-5L8CB, Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 2766 issued to N.C. Department of Transportation-dated July 30, 1992. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, 4i reston Howard, Jr. P.E. cting Director Attachments cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. John Parker Central Files REGIONAL OFFICES Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 9191486-1541 704/663-1699 919/733-2314 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer n NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to N.C. Department of Transportation pursuant to an application filed on the 2nd day of July, 1992 to construct a portion of the Central Business District Loop from SR 2210 to SR 2283 in Fayetteville. The Application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of tributaries of the Cape Fear River and adjacent wetlands in conjunction with the proposed CBD Loop in Cumberland County will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (increases such that the turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant). 2. Wetland mitigation shall be accomplished according to DOT's submittal of 26 June 1992. Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit. This the 30th day of July, 1992. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT U eston Howard, Jr P.E. A•t1ing Director WQC# 2766 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT RECEIVED Mr. Jack Ward AU6 4 1993 Permittee NCDOT Action ID. 199202767 REGULATORY BRANCH Permit No. Issuing Office CESAW-CO-E NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: The project entails the construction of 2.54 miles of roadway on new location, consisting of a four lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways from existing NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive). The project will impact approximately 13.2 acres of forested wetlands in the Cape Fear River Drainage Basin. Project Location: From existing NC 87 South of US 301 to East Mountain Drive (SR 2283), Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Permit Conditions: General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on December 31, 1996 . If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and condi- tions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordina- tion required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. ENO FORM 1721, Nov 88 EDITION OF SEP 82 IS OBSOLETE. (33 CFR 325 (Appendix A)) 1 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 6. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it con- tains such conditions. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. Special Conditions: See enclosed sheet. Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to: ( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). ( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413). 2. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. 3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. 2 0 a It e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. b. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (See 4 above). c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. Your signature below, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. MR. JACK WARD, NCDOT CXERMITTEE) (DATE) This permit becomes effec a when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below. 49-:S DISTRICT ENGINEER) (DATE) GEORGE L. CAJIGAL, COLONEL When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. (TRANSFEREE) (DATE) *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1986 - 717.425 I SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The NC DOT shall mitigate the loss of 13.2 acres of forested wetlands in accordance with a mitigation plan that is acceptable to the Corps of Engineers, the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, the National Marine Fisheries Service and any other interested state and Federal resource agencies. 2. All work authorized by this permit must be performed in strict compliance with the attached plans, which are a part of this permit. 3. All backfill materials will be obtained from a highground source and confined landward of the permitted bulkhead. 4. The temporary placement or double handling of excavated or fill materials within waters or vegetated wetlands is not authorized. 5. The fill material will be clean and free of any pollutants except in trace quantities. Metal products, organic materials, or unsightly debris will not be used. 6. No excavated or fill material will be placed in any location or in any manner so as to impair surface water flow into or out of any wetland area. 7. If the permittee discovers any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the authorized work, he will immediately notify the Wilmington District Engineer who will initiate the required State/Federal coordination. B. This Department of the Army permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law. 9. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. 10. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. 11. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future Federal activities initiated on behalf of the general public. c. Damages to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the authorized activity. d. Design and construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. -2- e. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 12. The following conditions have been made by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act. a. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increrease in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (increases such that the turbidity in the stream is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant. b. Wetland mitigation shall be accomplished according to DOT's submittal of 26 June 1992. r FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands Mitigation Proposal The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will insure that the mitigation site will exceed the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). NCDOT will document, using monitoring wells or visual observation, that this hydrology parameter has been met. Locations and numbers of monitoring wells, if utilized, will be established through coordination with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel. Installation of any wells will take place prior to planting. After grading of the site is completed, wetland tree species such as river birch (Betula nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii), water oak (Quercus nigra) and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will be planted on 8 foot centers to compensate for forested wetlands removed along the segment. Species compositions will be approximately equal. If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. NCDOT will be required to seed the mitigation area with grass immediately after grading to satisfy soil erosion regulations. Fertilizer and lime will be added to the area at this time. NCDOT will reapply these additives if it is deemed necessary prior to planting of the seedlings. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location o these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. _e u?r r _xi ^-P NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper elevation and grade, get permitting agency approval on the elevation 2. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality *river birch (Betula nigra) *green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) *overcup oak (uercus lyrata) *swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) *water oak (Quercus ni ra) *black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) * If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with Corps personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. 3. Coordinate hydrologic sampling with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers** ** Hydrological sampling will take place periodically throughout the growing seasons until adequate hydrological conditions are met B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition ti?14 E F_ Tj?? a-F- 3.5 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: Information from monitoring will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event - no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12% of the growing season) - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility A , . - -- - 0 y r^ a a? 0 •,., 4-3 , U 0 a ' •ri g9-.:.- ,rk f' c v V ?E 1 V Q V Z d d? - ;i d -?r.i z_ ao a o w A H h Q 0 JV 0 U a ? o :w a ;T ly ?M 1 k C ? f 0 i ti N V 8 o .? W' z O x ? A U h W h STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JAMES B. HUNT. JP- DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 July 14, 1993 District Engineer Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Dear Sir: wJ3J9 9-3 2 i Ica 1 1?7ETLP,t,DS GKM7 %'.'ATER 0l1Al I FY SECTK-1.1 SAM HUNT SECRETARY SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Fayetteville Central Business Loop, TIP No. U-0508 CA and U-0508 CB, State Project No. 8.2440501. The North Carolina Department of Transportation has prepared a mitigation proposal to offset the unavoidable impacts of the proposed project. As you are aware, a great deal of coordination has already taken place during the development of this proposal. A conceptual mitigation plan was distributed to appropriate regulatory and regulatory review agencies on November 16, 1992. Comments were received during January and February of 1993. The NCDOT then conducted additional investigations of the proposed mitigation site. Attached you will find a copy of the revised mitigation plan. This proposal reflects the comments received from the agencies. Please review this proposal, and provide any additional comments to us. If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin (919) 733-9770. Sincerely, J - 10 inn, PE Assistant Manager Planning and Environmental Branch cc: John Dorney, DEM David Yow, NCNRC W. F. Rosser, PE Division 6 Engineer Kelly Barger, PE, Project Management Don Morton, PE, Design Services A.L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics Unit FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Wetlands Mitigation Proposal 7/13/93 The 1990 Memorandum of Agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency specifies procedures to determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines. In accordance with this MOA, NCDOT is committed to mitigating for the unavoidable wetland impacts associated with the proposed CBD Loop project. A search was conducted for a suitable site for wetland restoration, enhancement or creation. This search took place first in the project area, and was later expanded within the Cape Fear River basin. A potential mitigation site was identified in Sampson County on the South River. A conceptual mitigation plan was prepared for this property, and distributed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of Environmental Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Comments were received from these agencies in January and February 1993, and this revised mitigation proposal reflects those comments. SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed mitigation site is located in Sampson County on the South River, a tributary of the Cape Fear River. This site is accessible by road from SR 1208, and has about 1/2 mile of frontage on the South River. It contains about 429.5 acres of field, undisturbed bottomlands, and logged areas. There are about 79.5 acres of farm fields under cultivation. These fields contain areas of hydric and nonhydric soil. About 150 acres of forest were cut over before 1987 and are regenerating naturally. It is not clear how much of this logged area is wetland. There are about 50 acres of undisturbed bottomlands along the river which are mostly wetlands. About 150 acres are currently being logged, and much of this area is wetland (See attached topographic map and aerial photograph). This site has been visited by representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. The general consensus of the agencies is that the site has a great deal of potential for wetland restoration and enhancement. It is possible that ownership of the tract could ultimately be transferred to the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, and this possibility is being discussed. Use of this property for mitigation will involve a combination approach of restoration, enhancement and preservation. It may also be possible to create fish spawning areas adjacent to existing lowlands. Primary emphasis will be given to those areas where wetland conditions have been entirely removed. This will especially apply to the farm fields containing hydric soil, where hydrologic restoration and reforestation should restore the original wetland conditions on the site. Secondary consideration will be given to enhancement of existing wetlands which have been deforested or have had the natural hydrology modified. Acquiring the property will also preserve high quality wetland habitat along the river. HYDROLOGY The first and most important component of the mitigation plan will be to restore natural hydrology. NCDOT will conduct a complete investigation of existing drainage patterns on the property, and develop a plan to reverse the man-made modifications on the site. The goal is to reestablish the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology on the areas of hydric soil present on the property (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). This goal will ensure that the wetlands on the mitigation site are comparable to those impacted by the CBD project, which were assessed under 1987 Manual criteria. At the present time, the property is drained by a series of ditches. These ditches occur both in the farm fields and the cutover areas. In some places of hydric soil, the ditches have apparently lowered the water table sufficiently to remove wetland hydrology. In other areas, hydrologic modification has not removed wetland status. For example, the recent logging activity has had detrimental impacts on the natural hydrology of the cutover area, but this area is still a jurisdictional wetland. The details of the hydrologic restoration have not been completed. The ditches will be plugged either with fill or structures in order to raise the water table. The placement and design of these modifications is currently being studied. This study will also determine the location and number of monitoring wells. Once the project is implemented Observation wells will be monitored one time per week during the growing season until the essential hydrology parameter has been demonstrated. The wells will be monitored once a month outside the growing season. VEGETATION The property contains areas where the vegetation is relatively undisturbed and other areas that have been extensively disturbed by farming and logging. The ditches through the agricultural fields have been colonized by canopy species such as sweetbay, red maple, sweetgum, river birch and tulip polar. The cutovers are in early stages of regeneration by early colonizers such as sweetgum and red maple. The cutovers also contain scattered cypress trees left by the loggers. Various shrubs are also to be seen, such as wax myrtle, gallberry, and redbay. There are also several residual stands of undisturbed bottomland. The canopy in these areas consists of such species as tulip poplar, black gum, loblolly pine, sweet bay, sweetgum, red maple, and willow oak. Several of these areas are still expected to be logged under a pre-existing timber deed. At one site, there is a wetland community with a scattered canopy containing atlantic white cedar and black gum stand. The understory of this stand includes an abundance of young white cedars. It is not certain whether this site is included in the timber deed. There is a fringe swamp forest along the banks of the South River. This stand consists primarily of mature cypress trees. The NCDOT proposes to reforest the cleared hydric soil areas of the property with the following climax forest species: Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata) Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii) Water oak (Quercus nigra) Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) These trees will be planted on 8 foot centers, with species compositions approximately equal. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. It may be possible to extend this reforestation over some of the logged areas if a suitable planting methodology can be found. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location of these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. MONITORING NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality 2. Hydrology monitoring wells will be monitred one time per week, at a minimum, until the essential hydrology parameter has been demonstrated. B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (S' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: written, post-construction monitoring reports will be provided to the Corps of Engineers no later than October 31 of each monitoring year from the time that wetland hydrology has been established and documented. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event -no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 26 consecutive days in the growing season - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility MITIGATION CREDITS At this time, NCDOT does not have detailed information about the extent of wetlands and drainage modification on the site. For this reason, it is difficult to estimate how much of the property will be useful for mitigation purposes. These questions will be answered by conducting an extensive soil survey of the property. A contract is currently being negotiated to have this work performed. It is apparent that the property will provide sufficient acreage to mitigate for the 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat impacted by the Fayetteville CBD Loop project. It is proposed that mitigation ratios for this property will be in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Mitigation Guidance. The following ratios may be used to determine needed debit acreages: Restoration 2:1 Creation 3:1 Enhancement 4:1 Preservation 10:1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED Several additional studies will be conducted to finalize the mitigation plan for this site. (1) Most importantly, a hydric soils map will be developed for the site. This map will reveal the location and extent of existing and former wetlands. It will also allow mapping of the hydric/non-hydric soil boundary. As mentioned earlier, a contract is currently being negotiated to have this work done. (2) The hydrologic analysis will be completed. This study will include: (a) A map showing ditches, natural drainages, location of new water control measures, and proposed monitoring wells. (b) Design specifications for proposed water control measures. (c) Feasibility of creation of anadromous fish habitat adjacent to the South River. (3) Feasibility of planting in the cutover areas will be addressed. This information will be provided to the COE prior to project implementation. It is expected that this remaining information will be compiled by November 1, 1993. 4J 77 to IN, unm. W Y -Y.7 DJg I `n ?J cv Z o oz ?o 40 o - - - o lDa1? ugh * ,,c Z), A O :1 E fl, -b W ty W -W 00 4 ' W v Z -A m . / ?,• c ? ti-, V){? ors ?': ? W o E U E cu -La ci 00 .. W JL ,` M p ev v U I?r W _ P? N M -- /1 q ... ..J ( f Q - ti 0 • o co H F• U O F A yy H ° c W Pi 4 o < .. 0 R W C4 ao C J U h a ? lm H O l a f . A sa SfATt o State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management 225 North McDowell Street Y Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 James G. Martin, Governor Roger N. Schecter William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director August 12, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO: for. A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Acting Director Division of Environmental Management FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. Inland "404" Coordinator SUBJECT: "404" Project Review The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No_ 2767 dated July 30, 1992 describing a proposed project by the its iii', Div_ of Highways, Cumberland County, is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits. Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by August 31, 1992. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY This office supports the project proposal. No comment. Comments on this project are attached. This office objects to the project as proposed. Signed Date P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-2293 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Action ID 199202767 July 30, 1992 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS (NCDOT), Post office Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT THE CAPE FEAR RIVER IN FAYETTEVILLE, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans submitted with the application show construction of a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. The work will involve construction of 2.54 miles of roadway consisting of a four lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways from existing NC Highway 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) (Projects U- 0508CA and U-0508CB). An estimated 45,036 cubic yards of fill material discharged at four locations will impact approximately 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood wetlands, including one 8.2 acre area . NCDOT proposes to compensate for lost wetlands on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. The purpose of the work is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. -2- The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registerec properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess -3- impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the DEM for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after August 21, 1992. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 17, 1992, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Scott McLendon, until 4:15 p.m., August 31, 1992, or telephone (919) 251-4725 :, veal W . ? ? • ; ? Nrw.. ? - /M.-,• ? •Gww^ S .. S. -S -fI ?•'?" r,..N.r,l ,% , ElJtnf'fin 1 . bu: SITE U4 ( Cllt,toll* A I M O N 110I.111r•1. ??'w ,v r." A,«,-•,1. • ?( ." If m"If ? T .r ? A•.Ir? 1 /••' ? Ir?r MrM? T 1 •.•IN ? r . r? Nope M11It cr.. rn+ . 4.1 is, 0. op r ?FIInItIY SCOT D '.lrrrT A^I,« 0 bra. _ _ _ •\ P4 op- ..d 41 ' 1 v.- .?.• ' 1, s^.?..,^ is l 1? `ON M.Nr, .? , f 01 IT tr•^n f.• TMr r` `+4 1 .? .,w ...? Arww•n Grl?^I 4 w H.1f '? .1 l>IKT 11 w...Alk ` S«.t M1? 1 +1 T? '?..- ' .?4 ?Ut 1\ wq.a0r• 'tLADEII ,? T 1 •IIM 1 12 T«?~•M j1, LAMES ., •+ 1 1•.Ir r l,, ?I•R . B E O N 1 I ' st 7E ttl,rrl. ' IACca . ' H./1,? r r r. ?I 11 ,? \ N , ?T~ * F REST il,lne 4 ?'; 11 r.?erUB A Q. N. . `' 1 , .. 1, ? ; 1 I I'?w.•« l 1 trove t 0 S Ip SCAR OF WkIS OW NCH EQUALS ArMX I71ll CS C,•wte^ F..41 SCALE Of IIAOWTIRS 011( wCH EQUALS Art•OR 71 KA p•I ruts cvr«, p 10 lO )0 •0 .1 1 Yitl IS IQUAL TO I10 AILOIM IM • ?` _ 1 IL '1 IAf• l ,ur ; °?' 3 BEG PROD. IN A e ,1 , 1 I se I.J U6, 1 1, Iw, Y 11,r ,w SITE .. SCALE 1 0 1 7 7 w 0 3 .M1 »• END PROJ. ? ?----?_- "`,;,• SCALE K A EWA-W EM1KTS EI uN I Ilr' , - N.C. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATIO n•. .u DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS r». CUKBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.21,10301 U'r08CA ''1'u C 8 D LOUP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET 1 OF 16 12 - 91 lot. i z _ MA TG!! L /NE A ?\ \I' T' _ , f,\\ I - 1 1 1 N O Q J F.. -,? oo •-• Cv CDCC -n- o ?- c I x E - 2 V p C-a cG x U o d I ?a. C-- O =l Z o -? Z - I I +? J N O O OG - C1.. cs. C-3 ? m E o N I C =b -. s ?C -- U _7 1 1 - .-. ca c--'), w -? 0 C-- w v o can "-, - 04 x y I I I \\I 8 7.. a m o Q C-3 J tri T z ? E-- Cz Gal - > •--. }? oC s v o I ? fir-+ ?c? cz. I O.. Q z -.r z I X J N O O C34 i - . -. W Q7 I dr C!3 m .-. C_> w 9=:? S- 9=1 1-s w V o Gil - oC x C3- C-> CW-l MA TCI-1 L IAIZ- S o? 7 z a N 1 0 Q ..? Q? -? U i N aC a- o ? f!a z Z E-- x C'3 = r., oC z v o I u) 4-- .cs c:- , I C:. cs v -1 7 N O l - C7 a? - a. I t=J c- .._. w Co ? I n. c/] m ?--4 U w C:j . c-b '-s W C.> O a] - o. z x Cl_ U co-) IOATCH L //VE - D r oq 0 O I _ I a o ? - - T A - ?Nl7 H-2'LVW QC-3 rn -C cia z z ? E- 2 C? = W I oG s C? o C.L. '"L' J N O O cz - Gl . 1 ?-- ._.. C-3 op O I n. vi m O LQ 1 I c> > = U 1 ?- U W D E W V O m :s1 X a U cn MATCH LINE E ? I \ 1 ? u I ? I\ I I P? i 1 \\ ?N UQ Q ?/Y/ 7 1-12-Z VW - ' MA TCH z ENE PLAN VIIE'W - F T T ? ? ` li I ' l W ?. END v ?- CONST. S TA . I 129+g I I 1 I 7.1 Ile -T _ KI NBC. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION WF_T/ANDS ???ir DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DENOTES PILL IN WETLAN-DS CUNBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,210501 U-508CA C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE scwi,g i" = sa SH EEY_ 7__0?'_ 6 _ 12 - 91 ' f i W I Al ,2&111 )iiNI-•1 ti u .a Pa, J. PO A Z v v I - V- ?N 11 H :)1`dW J V) 0 Z Q H W W Q l? Q. O CC a O CT) \o 0 O ?z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O 0 Q ? O) -C U J LC) _ o? x L.> o -..e_ I cam. O z ?.- ? I `"= 7 N c* O - 6-» p ?--• cv_- w • ao I a. O I n. V] m p Q? I A } ? U I p ?-? w 0 o m ;? X n.. U cia LL U - Ls') - V _ 3 O J W - C7 Q J o M w H c V - _ - ? c O U N a O x C o Ol O o col 1?- o _ v- ?N I? DiVv4 -c act tI? o ?- a - U ca ` --3 ?• N F -- - - Z V = ; GJ o? I "C E- •--• C> --? o .cs ?- I d I Cy C1 l9 O - • ?--+ z. I Z O Q Z O ? J _ C-3 N oo O I c.? ?-r S E-- O --? I A ? ? U A ^? 0 W T X ? U to U - Ln V _ W I Q o L - Q- 0 a > Q J I r J In 0 ° - - Z I _ Q ? J I- W ll f?9 ? cV - W 41, a x ° o O O O o 0 Cm/ W CC) MATCH LINE - B - Q? OD 0 -t U ? rn a? a- o ?- ao CY 3 E- - Z C--7 C.-3 o? s U o -? ? I Ca. 1 Cs. a o - 1 t7 c? 6-- ?-+ w m p I l CL v13 m p oi C-2 ?-. s E- - I ca ? = U I r-? U C-4 Gl E-» A ? W C.> p m :-.3 ? T ? a. U cn w C) OI O m Co W O W Fy O U H tl' PC O C) c a o -V- 3NI-1 HDIVA M TCH LIN - C - M o -t o - Q U y7 7 '' _ Q1 N - Z c c-+ ? oG s U o -C I ? V,,, U E? c:.. Ca ..-a o Cs. I -I U - "Z O 7 N Q - ?- d_ ? CA W m co :Z) I 3 CX3 A -4 y ? => E-- C.> ° -I I 0 •-. 9=4 L> w a E-. J v o m ci. U cra z w 0 Q CV Q - a ?- J Q a ° O a '= o J CV - ° z Q J w 3 - F--1 PTM o A t O CV - W O I r0 '.q ? U 0 I ? A O O - 8 - 3N I -1 H C1dW - O O O o 0 C) Go MATCH LINE _ p - cV CV Ln _ C?1 0 E-» < Q1 o? a- 0 3 N o --c Z- "-, :Al cx_ 3 ?- E- va z ?e = H z v ? w e-- ..c-> c:. fir) I cy. a ? -.- z I ? O J cr-, N C1. a @- - ?- • -• w m ao O o N I v >- ? v I ?--• c? w a E-- V O cfl :? ?G C- CX- U fi tr] ?4 H P O ? 00 s 0 U _ O D C M N o 0 - :)- 3NII H*D1dN 0 ?-+ E- Q w - Ql -+C E-. /] U oo J --4 c? T o =>- N o t ?- not .-A -_, E? - C---7 z Cc] -? ? %-4 o s U ---? o }-- ?C I ??I E- ?-. Cs. c=k O =C Ica o -?+' Gam. Z 1 - I I o +t 'Z J -?- N r . :z+ o o0 0 I r C3- C-3 cn m ?-? Y F• O ( l - I A => ?--4 U v C-L3 C) 1 E-- - C? ca O m w -.i ? cx:: a v s c? eo soso-n 803 llwa3d SONTU1IM 33S 3N 1-I H D IVN1 O) cV - l I z - T ??--+ 1 U W / L r) Q cr I U I 0 00 -? a I Q - w ? C) I r J a S? Q Q m x J w `fl -' x O U o t ; SG ' P C J 1 q A O O ?A a i O ? - 0- 3 N I -I HDiVrq 0 ? o 0 G) F Q J oe a- o ? N va s z = E- E? Ems-- " CL 1 r.. O O - 1 ?A O ? rr- u .'..a.. J N O p a1-- - d . I F. ?. w oo I ca_ vl m O ? 1 C-3 :INC 4-• l _ I Q v V 1 ?---? U C_s.1 D E-- 0 C-3 O lJ Az V O Q V + O y x n_ . v C111 cr ?1 ?! Ml? L() i? r.4" rip 1.4 _ ° r 1, 1 p A ? ? l c E o i 0 I 0 om 00 EARTH QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.2 FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2925.9 AC. C.Y. TOTAL FILL 35327.7 C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS 1 Aldolphus Turner Estate C/O Lillian I. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6288 2 W. Greg Sutton 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 28305 3 Mary Sutton Estate C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305 5273 4 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302 1829 Y.C. HPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF RICHWAYS CMERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2105H U-508CA C B 0 LOOP IN FIYETTEVILLE SHE;ET_ 16-OF_I G 8-91 <r !II rn -rrvr?T wn p<Irny `' I I ?1? \S, i alr sd'^I+ tf Sa'^y> 10) / \\\ N EO (y e>r , ? I 2 ? JODnfon rrHr I bp?? - /_' 4_ f 5 .?, wrfl End ' ? .. ,? 1 ' ? r''• ? Sw-<. , ? Sut ml y, 1 { ' , ,` /?.1 ? \?Mlnc lteflN ? ++ ' {!It'.'/`I.arrrr 62 ) .f ?' tlclr> l 1 t 1n ikt • To i Prnrnwfl ul Pines SA C A N /Y'1 Y?^rv A lel Ab, n.r1< P,n<blurl , Farettfrill I' r ?u: M P 5 O N rr I! SITE ' O K E }[ Syr I H 44, A I M O N I laontlo>r 7 5 v«w« A Ir, l< • -; Nott?ln ? 4.A, Nf `C?mD<.itn ,,` I Sttdmsn I t lawn ., ? Irmbrll lne n Not41•.>? •1.. y Due<I M!'fl , *etab , <r(.r 11?? Mills r C<dn C--- P"><?«v J Coi^rr I I?il 1% , AI abl) ?. I Ml.' ocAlnQha , I .` {? PP4ton? lent 1 t* II 1 ?', f Uu n<n 171 1 y, t: id Ui ' an f'' r" t?Hamitt* SCOT D M rnn Anl,n elrd tt • / 1 _ Lrr, 1. y L r. L,r hGVI r?yu ' / I - - - - I /' Rr1 \ 43 -- >^, L? , wr, e,.r w7 Sntn?un y'1 /. rLrr Y I `OIe Iv,ele Ar.,.n on 'G lrl lnd I II• Rr. ,?Q, / r. Gwlo ?' IW S-I lull, ` 1 53 _ Awe Hill I 71 w,..ru, 'II` \ 19 1 illr,nD ti `? ? rrnrl. O,4 ?BLADEN ? ? ? r,lelP GID,y rllo^ 72 < ?^ LAKES 'SA r,on .I 1 C pol 1 lo? 10- I ,, N I 7 ? wNlr S nl IroR d r B E O n StAiE 1 ' R,1 ?' 711 Oubhrl?l`, 1 + IWV fr••' IA r Il.,lr ' E't I I •7 IPArI f+ I .r f• .'f. \ ' 6] N<r I'. a ?c 1 'FOREST ? ,villt lId) I? ual0eritul+' 11 B I r'/ A \e, O, N . r • Y ,? •?/',rr ? Nnrnn!' 1 ..I, 1 ? Ily I 4. L , Ira /??-{. 1 UIld enn u'n '' , ?'. r ?J / t ,•<I? 12 ? 1 t,foun 51 uu.., nrl 1, 0 5 10 _ 20 SCALE Of MILES ONE INCH LWALS APPROA 1) MILES - 11r4' Inn SCALE 01 KILOMETERS ON( INCH (OVALS A?r RO. 11 41111M(i[RS/' C!'rtlf 0 10 20 JO 40 /i 1 MIL( IS IQUAL i0 1 601 RILOM[IENS II 0 '110 7 1 t! I+r 1171 ?' J} .I1+ O nw e n, "f w r Jn J'ro ,nr ,>o, s 1 00/ _ IN, 'w I DEG. PROJ. no nti 117' II,I) I'll k I)); 1llr> l ^I ,,,, "°' END PROJ . Pr ? , LTM. I SITES SCALE I 0 I_ 7 ] I MIILS SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS J I n.. I r I ,• W, C01? r, N. C. DEPT. 01' TRANSPOR'T'ATION DIVISION OF HIGHIV'AYS CUMRI;RLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508-11 (7 11 1) 1,0011 IN FAYE171:VILLE SHEET -I- OI' 15 JUNE 92 ? H F--I toA k? ? I O I i a a o I a ? a ? A A .a F. aa. w a H A 0 n U F C` O Q e! H ? W O C 2 C a Gt. Lf F^ O '?: co Z W ? OF. ? ? ti S C? W ? U O o A A ? U a' `? c U ? O a a aF ? a• \ _ - - In 1.. z .-? co o 1 '1'x'1 - - - -------- ?? - - - - J wil'KES ROAT c C\li N a Q w Q) U, .a W z b z oa x ,, '.? ? ? p o"? F- O Q oo z ?+ o I w ? a O ? a O O ? ? 8 0. Ln ti M ? ? U O A A G a U a ? W U w a a _ o cz _ a -? 0 o_ c x ? F ._ ? tz V .°n w WILK 's ROAD Aar 1 + H ?C w h O 0 E- "a E-' ? '" c w x F o z N 0 z - - ° ? cc ? u w g a I a U O A Q a a ? I U U l «? 7 u? X U O J C_) 1 L? o U ` 'Q I J I Q Lil I cr i ., O Cl- ? i ? z O c? ,/ 1 O - 1---1 ? O W I - w a Cl\j ? i .? o O ? ° X O W ?" w a LLJ O z V) U o H '? A w LI) oG x ?. E- O oo z o z w CL O O ca U 8 a V) l17 U O ca A ? Q $- U d ? W O I z U x ° Q O cn ? I M ao ! U a LiJ I a??a I Q ? ? I s- ? P I Z ? w R I ? o U W U? U z o 00 'n/. O W Q . -" L1 W ^ FI-^ a `W _ L n u Ci Lr as E , n o o rat ? ? ^ ^ c v c c w I I I _ I I I I I u2 I 00 I z -? i z ? I x o - o I a a o I ? I a I I I I I I ? ? I I - Ln I i ? cc x L I I I I I I I a z I H I W a I I I I I I I I? I Ca I N ? v 1 ?: W W J W '? r^ oG ? G u, "" ?; p cc., Ln o v a 4 w f ? o a .J W U W x CJ I I I _ x ? I I I ? I I I I ? I I I I I ? I I I I I I I I I I I I . I _ Ln I ?- I I I ? I I I I I I LL I _ O I ?_ ? I I I O I I I i-n I I i I I I IU I I Iv I I I '? I I I : I- I I z z . I I I a o o x I I I I I a ?' I 1 1 x CL I a a I Q I a I o l a I I I I w v I l I E, I W `? I a I a o a I I I ? i I I I I I d ? I I I I ? I I I I I I I I I I I C I u? I h n? l ? ; r? W c I ° 0 1 ° Q I I x I Ev- I ? I ? I I I I I I 00 I z i n. 0 3 I a a x I a I o I x a I? I I x ( I I I I 0 0 i i v, %. I J C W J, I ;? ? E- a; ?O W c .n n s ? % Q V o "4 CA "? ? ?J Q L7 v J .- - ? I I I I I I I 11 _ I ? ?=--1 I I I I i II I II ?., I ?'? II I I I I I I ? I ? I I d` I ? I I I I I ?( A o I 00 I I I ? I w I I a I ? I x I a I ? ? I II ' I s, ? I I I ; I I I I ? I ? II ,I I I I c II I ?? I i I I ??? I iLL- I I I . - ?- r T W Ln W H 0 W Q Q % N W P. ? , q W ? w u ? -- U '?;r" Q o ° " Gc. Ln W W ? Ct. ? U ci O /1 (1 _ CTS % A c1 x v' Q W E- O `? F- U a 0 O - Q W ti .a Q cU ? CL U W x - cn a x ca a 0 c? ? a a W ? \ ? I I I I I I W ?' . I I I I I I - ? . 'I _ ,? I I I I - I ? II ? I I U z ?L I ? CIO U z O i x I i r ,n I { ?I IN I o x a i I `? I r I v I - + I? I I ? ??I r 7?Ln Ln I I I 3 I_ Q x u E- Q; . . r W . U 4 ILI o PC W O ? N ct" 0 I? r l? -J a z i a N F a w LL o 'C ? x z o A ? w LC) ° w A U o ? A ? U U O a p" 8 A ? U F G? ? ? u un V S J ?J Q r J W Q W J cJ _J v I Q Q `N ?O _l lu Q Q? d lU cl? W I V I ? v? t J Q J V o lij ,J L-L O Cf- O w N ? W x U c W x •r z LC) ?- o Ci oc z a O O ? U 0. O Q ? U O A U a W z U ? X11 J Q 1?j v V ? Q v N w O v? N o O co O O Q Q? I?. I? I CD O O z J ?-U 3 W O 0 0. ? W C ? x o U A o w z Lr O w U 0 > A ? U O p" o A ? ? - z u ?Al v Q J e ? Q v N Q41- O D O - O O + QT M d Q 3 o Q o ° w U) ? f I I I ? - - o F ,? o z x F u. a A U ? ? c? o ? A ? p z c cc ? U w w a o w 0 z a U w g Ca a U N Ul W n 0 ? M W LC) 0 c ? ' U l $- V -YA UO , E-' LLJ a I ?. U? M 0-4 s- a Z i i a W z o m SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TO'T'AL FILL WETLANDS(AC.) O,H.W.(CY.) (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL. 0 5591 I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 L41+12 TO NATIONWIDE IA 141+ 52 -L- 14 0.2 0 23 1.45+00 TO INDIVIDUAL. 1168 11 155 + 00 -L- 404 1.6 0 _ 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8-2440501, U-50SCB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE EE T `? SH _l_-. OF 1J 5 JUNE PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Cumberland County Rede.el- Fayetteville, NC opment Center County of Cumherla„d I H. Lacy Godwin Ertate 2521 Raeford Road Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 2 J. A. Holmer Ertate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 3 John Sinclair Perry I's.tate 587-C Windinj Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 4 D. L. Porry E.t.to 587-C Winding Crook Fayetteville, NC 28305 5 Grady It. Jackaun, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 28305 N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET 15 OF 15 JUNE -92 FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands Mitigation Proposal The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will insure that the mitigation site will exceed the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). NCDOT will document, using monitoring wells or visual observation, that this hydrology parameter has been met. Locations and numbers of monitoring wells, if utilized, will be established through coordination with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel. Installation of any wells will take place prior to planting. After grading of the site is completed, wetland tree species such as river birch (Betula ni ra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii), water oak (Quercus ni ra) and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will be planted on 8 foot centers to compensate for forested wetlands removed along the segment. Species compositions will be approximately equal. If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. NCDOT will be required to seed the mitigation area with grass immediately after grading to satisfy soil erosion regulations. Fertilizer and lime will be added to the area at this time. NCDOT will reapply these additives if it is deemed necessary prior to planting of the seedlings. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location o these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. r f NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting F? B. At completion of planting A? C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper elevation and grade, get permitting agency approval on the elevation 2. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality *river birch (Betula nigra) *green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) *overcup oak (Quercus lyrata) *swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) *water oak (Quercus nigra) *black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) * If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with Corps personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. 3. Coordinate hydrologic sampling with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers** ** Hydrological sampling will take place periodically throughout the growing seasons until adequate hydrological conditions are met B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: Information from monitoring will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event - no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12% of the growing season) - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility KEMORANDUM INITIALS : Rev i ewer: I.'O : John Dorney WO Supv : Planning Branch Date: __/1-7_1'1- SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)*** PERMIT_YR: 92 PERMIT NO: 0000:359 COUNTY: CUMBERLAND APPLICANT NAME: NC DOT - CENTRAL BUS. DISTRICT LOOP PROJECT-TYPE: ROAD LOOP PERMIT-TYPE: IND COE_#: 199202767 DOT_#: U-508CB RCD._FROM _CDA: DOT DATE _FRM_CDA: 07/02/92 REG_OFFICE: FRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN #: 030616 STREAM CLASS: (" STR_INDEX_NO: 18-(26) WL_IMPACT?:PN WL_TYPE: FTBH WL_REQUESTED: 3.10 WL_ACR_EST?: YIN HYDRO_CNECT? : 4)(0/r9r- WL_SCORE (#) : 6 MITIGATION?:? N MITIGATION TYPE: B 4ITIGATION_SIZE: Z`.l C??vS?p> IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: YC? RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY C - s, 74F-- ?QO55,Li?? , (pA.Rcylar?7.}0?,.? 1.?sfZ{-< 1c: Regional Office Central Files - 910 p 1 11 r•M 1 M•. ? MN.Mn..IN , - ?_ ?? _" I, , ` ???? Mrclri,lr • ..? 1111 r` 1c-?r• f ' Memo ? wNrr., ' tAlfw MKS S¢ i 1..111 ??« . w•t w• _ I... ... v -• + t O N •.. /•.rW11 H Ir 1 •' fn?ttt?ln . ?u• M P S SITE I M O N ,l. , tt°•nw.,. M.,.« ' A.?.-,w . "Unitoll?M . ti ,• Intl .._ y ,?? L....1... .e.a •r .? 4 ' /'twpt Mutt Cru C...? , ,?? .`. ?w« Iytl yt: 1? ? ow r , .t* II , •. , •1 11 SCOT _/ ` .»" 'l ; r:• .T.4 _ r« v 1st ?• - - - S?.-•v, i•ar fJ? .,. mow wr..Ml .: r -- I .L a 1 ( t .., /f , ..?. A,...,.. c«I..wr • wa wrt I?i MM Snwl H ?`.. Y . •r. \• . wt..M OM ']II.ADE71 s •n Nr •rHr• 11 rM ».e. BARES f 1 Irw..ti t ' ' M I , ,•/ 1 R . B ,. " E 1 O N , 1 ' l„•,\I`.., sf l EH IM1..1H e ` •. \x ;.«... '?.t• ' ?c * .(?V? t w. 1 •F REST ?` ` t. s.dk 9 raletlNw4.. B . A a, .?i % t 2 . ! ¦•- M `..tw• . 1 ;11 .. 0 3 Il SM( Of MILS OM( INCH tQVALS AFMWI I) MI(Y CNMM Artir SUL( Of KKOr(1(I1S OM( INCH IQUALZ AM101 2I0I1tOrt1Uts 0 Il - M SO t0 as I nU IS IQVAl 101/" IIIIOWtIfS ?'?. 1 ,L 'f ' --r NLA w 1 ' 'Y •. tl LAP IN« f •" ?..r r 1? 1 _ PROJ. BEG. It'o 11 •,l I1V UVt rv 11 ?•'wi: in, ,1t. I'm SITE SCALE No I o 1 t I . wu. END PROJ. n. SCALE FO11 UAAA('EMEMS 1 1 .4 APT` Nq E 't„ "" N. C. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION Is- ^ 1. - DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS I,M ties CCNBERLAND COUNTY r `" PROJECT 8.140501 U-SOSCA "u C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE rr till SHEETFZ?6 ?2 - 91 No • APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME : NC DOT Central Busniss Loop • DEM #: WQC#: MAP #: 92359 2766 • COUNTY: Cumberland • LOCATION OF MITIGATION SITE (LAT. AND LONG.) • DIRECTIONS TO MITIGATION SITE: • ACREAGE AND TYPE OF WETLAND IMPACTED: 13.2---bottomland hardwoods • ACREAGE AND TYPE OF WETLAND MITIGATED: 26.4---bottomland hardwoods • DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION(IN FILE): grading and planting • DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION(IN FILE): River birch, Green ash, Overcup oak, Swamp chestnut oak, Water oak, Black gum • SUCCESS CRITERIA STATED(if any): 320 trees/acre after 3 years • WHAT IS THE PROJECT STATUS?(mark one): RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION, PRESERVATION • MONITORING PLAN: Yes. Report to the COE. • WHICH REGULATORY AGENCIES ARE INVOLVED?: DEM, NCWRC, COE • TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT(mark the ones that apply): RURAL, URBAN, PUBLIC, PRIVATE t FIELD INFORMATION • DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION(AT SITE): • SURFACE WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS: • SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER RELATIONSHIPS: • HAVE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS BEEN MET?: • DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN: (?jo C E s" DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY q AUG - 3 1992 Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers ? DIVISION OF Post Office Box 1890 F11GHWgyS P? Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 ?RFSEAR?N? Action ID 199202767 July 30, 1992 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS (NCDOT), Post office Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT THE CAPE FEAR RIVER IN FAYETTEVILLE, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The following description of the work is.taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans submitted with the application show construction of a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. The work will involve construction of 2.54 miles of roadway consisting of a four lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways from existing NC Highway 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) (Projects U- 0508CA and U-0508CB). An estimated 45,036 cubic yards of fill material discharged at four locations will impact approximately 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood wetlands, including one 8.2 acre area . NCDOT proposes to compensate for lost wetlands on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. The purpose of the work is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. m? SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL FILL WETLANDS(ACJ O.H.W.(CY.) (CYJ 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL 0 5591 I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 L41+12 TO NATIONWIDE 23 IA 141+ 52 -L- 14 0.2 0 145+00 TO INDIVIDUAL 1 6 0 1168 11 155 + 00 -L- 404 . 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501. U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET ?=? OF 15 JUNE 92 0 TIP PROJECT NO. U-50SCA, CB NC 87 RELOCATION, FROM SR 2253 (EAST b1OUNTA I N DRIVE) TO US 301 FAYETI'EVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ENVIRONMFNTAI, DOCUMENTATION 1. 1 -95 , 1-95 FAYE-TE;V I LL_E BYPASS (Draft Environmental Statement, signed 5/10/73) - Compared I-95 bypass and existing US 301 widening improvements - Included NC 87 relocation from I-95 to East Mountain Drive 2. TIP No. R-201B, NQ 17 RELOCATION, FROM EAST MOUNTAIN DRI_VI? TO US 301 (Final. Negative Declaration, signed 4/23/79) - Compared new location alignment widening improvements 3. TIP No. U-508, II'AyE1_1'I;VILLF CBI) TO US 301 (Final Statement, signe and existing NC 87 comb A-W SO -r7 LOOP, !ROM HAY STREET Wirl IVC 17 Environmental Impact 7/18/83) - Investigated various corrid/o-rs - narrowed to one corridor 57? a6l ? W, Sky so - Discussed in depth one main alignment through downtown Fayetteville, with variations of interchanges 4. TIP No. U-508CB, _NC 11 RELOCATION,_ FROM IA_S`[' MOUNTAIN DRIVE TO US 30] (Reevaluation of Final Negative Declaration, signed It/26/91) - Discussed one main alignment previously established in the earlier documents - ?e Z1/0"j)Gk ' " .? '?:\ j i ?, i. .. ?? ~W ? %• ?? ---?? .r/a ?erj'Sr urf -? ?il /??{ ?'il? ?Jl?ct•,., •. _ ` %%'/'?• . • 1> :I . \?,? -, i 1 ? 1 1 ?? l / ??, f?i ] r, 11 t- /'?? _ I i ??%!? I I J?n?f •?. ?)-? r ?•/ ?'' ???II ??•J 1 iii ' \1 _ :? ;.. / : Ch l ?'' ???? % II r $ )I . ???JII ?'•:a'. -- :. :" V / :? ?? ? / - ?• / t ? ?? .. / I' ? ? & ?. I r-??; • •+-l;' , All ?`I / ? I f l? i ? ? • .? ? ??r `???;??, ? 1 . ' I : ? ?,?Y ? ?J C }l, .!,Yj ?t • _ .???_ ?? __. ?? ? ? 1 Il ??/ 1, / II ;?; 1?R1 ? 1:A •?1T w? ? '?_ _-_? I -1t l'?' it J 'I '• ? - J• ? g o?-? ?* { ?• I n 1 sff, <J? L':' S?/{ n??? Vii. ..:,.o e l :I'C''1 :1. 7 ?`' '•?? '??\ ?/•/ r?? ?i` ---_ _-°-,?,? l?/1•i/il?:j' IL/?? }?,?':?1 // II.?'_, ? `,? ?.: ' •' -- ?-%G[i,\,rrl`??1 '--?` / ?% -..+ ?.?'i,^.'• i;'? rr,?_` ;. .? •'1 :? cu'r' ?--' __ -? St _.u ea - C ? 5?? ? '?% ?? ???? ?? ? ?? _^y"",-, Frs, r t _-` II?Ch '? ? ? ? ',1 ? ? ? 1 ? ? • - / ?; V ? ? • r,l O°. ER /?%?{j// / ?' .\r ?? (/ a -??I .?I(p ©Et. EN ?]r-- ` I I \ •i f? 0 ['20 "/• r.`N.#t//.F/ i1? OO . } ?, I II I ?l{A A.? \?I ROC F/9 • 1 I Ln-?:??' i? ?Ih' '. 7 ` \\\\.• --- C.•• $ /% a r', /oo TIP NO. U-508 / y (. %%?? ?l 1/?II TEVILLE ?• :?' (.000 FAYET , ..I J . - I ? i? ? 3011 / ?E _=sl ?? 'a •?? I ? ?• I ''%r v --?\ :7 •/ l//?1 1 C`\ 1 VP II X11 p n ?l. ,il; of I \ \• r % ?, ? \ ? •.l I ?.? '7 ?. _ - ? ? , -'gyp _ .1 '?: f )? \. `=`y'% " `Y ? ??,'u `?,??-•-<Y \ 1 •?1: .%/o? Z ._1/2i11?\•' 1 %? = ?. __,?-,y?i??bRh„? , pC ? I?; ?? - - 110 .%?• ,•? \ •l. -"•:? F C}} B'L'S '?"?:''., ,•.- °' _- ? ?Y Yr' J ?h o/? , ` / P Fpi?IC';1. ' ", .? I "?I. • e?? Pe ?Mr t. •\ .,% \ 17 7 ms • J? ?/. ropy s? __-: illa e f •o% ,? A/ :,,> -="r I ., ° % Missi fLY,II Towero. U% Ft•i C •/ / / L.\1 -t . °1 fi. t ?_: r.r•' ; ' ^? 1®? . -'' :?• ?. ,h ? ? r ,?:? pig v l ? '.% •VA i' % i TIP NO. U-508CB J ate T. %J\ I 1 1 / '? 1 2? %?.':1? - TIP NO. R-201B _• '1Jt21• ??' _ ?? ??% -./_%? ,/?/r \ r1..G?..... %,.ws7 \ 1 11 .>t?. _ I %A / M % • ? l ly_ 1 _ mss.. t% ` -`\ "3 FAY 4 ET VI Fayettw%Munic c o?ri / r I /. 6 o- J Eayet2cv7T \Mftnclpal Airl 5 -4- co, LEGEND \ G ??, ti. I . ?• I? \ •_. I-95 BYPASS/NC 87 RELOCATION 0 I .A e 0 Q ° QM oat r?P 11' es\v` `. d ?\ NC 87 RELOCATION TO CBD LOOP ???????????????????1 \ , ! 1• \ '~`, `;'' ' - %% Rest I.?vW Area FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP _- cl) SCALE: 1 IN= 2000 FT /-- ?" -- i't \ ' ' 1`ll?;r a $I v ?. ??` PRO ®" 11 'nicipalAlr 'Grannls Fleld A* r? Sandpits]. 1 S ??\ \I ?.? \ c \m ,\V "1\ ?,1 tC/Ir IJ al I`i \. i " n\\ ? ?? -? Cemr _ ? IL\I Sa (l ,. / \ ?.?. x110\\ - L X45: Q^? ?BM 83 Drag Strip 'Cem )'??/I, 1 \ s Gra s0 1 \ _ ,:?a .\' ?? ?: • Creek FIGURE 1: NC 87 RELOCATION/FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP Onslow County, SR 1406, Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek, State Project No. 8.2260401, TIP No. B-2158. NCDOT Contact: Doug Huggett 12/11/93 Met onsite with environmental agencies. Outlined proposed project. NCWRC asked that, in an effort to further mitigate for project related wetland impacts, NCDOT investigate purchasing a small upland parcel adjacent to the project, from which wetland habitat could be created. The property owner has indicated a willingness to sell this parcel, and NCDOT is currently negotiating to purchase the property. 1/19/93 Applied for CAMA and 401 Water Quality Certification. Corps of Engineers has previously authorized this project under NWP 23 (Categorical Exclusion). 4/8/93 August, 1993 ?Cxj -, Y?14113 First CAMA 75 day review period ends. Project scheduled to be let. Permits needed by end of June. d?'Ct- e)c,& /'v MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Planning Branch SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ***EACH ITEM MUST BE ANSWERED (N/A-NOT APPLICABLE)*** INITIALS: Reviewer: WO Supv : Date: /2-7-1'- PERMIT_YR: 92 PERMIT_NO: 0000359 COUNTY: CUMBERLAND APPLICANT NAME: NC DOT - CENTRAL BUS. DISTRICT LOOP PROJECT-TYPE: ROAD LOOP PERMIT-TYPE: IND COE_ff: 199202767 DOT_;k: U-508CB RCD_FROM_CDA: DOT DATE_FRM_CDA: 07/02/92 REG_OFFICE: FRO RIVER-AND-SUB-BASIN-4: 030616 STREAM CLASS: C STR INDEX N0: 18-(26) WL_IMPACT?: PN WL_TYPE: FTBH WL_REQUESTED: 3.10 WL_ACR_EST?: YIN HYDRO_CNECT? : Y,6)(OAer- a.- µ'ta^^-?i c?• ,?) WL_SCORE HU : 6 MITIGATION?: ON MITIGATION-TYPE: B MITIGATION-SIZE: Z'l CPP-?5e--Q> IS WETLAND RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: Yo RECOMMENDATION (Circle One): ISSUE ISSUE/COND DENY C L.- - s, VAer J18-?? 1 4- n'l cc: Regional Office Central Files lh K U U L5 e?j??? 9 02 a S GROUT' ITY SECTION N .r? .? S1Att n STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR November 3, 1992 THOMAS J. HARRELSON SECRETARY District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch NOV 10152 a EiLANDS GROUT' I V?'ATER (!UCIITY SECTIOtJ __,, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 2.54 miles from existing NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) TIP # U-508CA and U-0508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501 Dear Sir: Reference is made to our application of July 17, 1992 and your letter of October 7, 1992 regarding the proposed-extension of the Central Business Loop in Fayetteville. Your letter requested that the plan sheets be corrected to reflect wetland limits identified during a August 20, 1992 site visit. These corrections are included in the enclosed revised application package. The revisions indicate that the extent of wetland impact was underrepresented in our previous application. Our first application indicated a wetland impact of 11.3 acres. The revised drawings depict 13.2 acres of impact to bottomland hardwood wetlands. In you letter, you requested that impacts to ponds be addressed in the application. The location of five sites of pond impact are indicated on Sheet 1 of 15 for project U-508CB. Fill amounts are summarized on Sheet 14 of 15. An estimated 1.24 acres of ponds will be impacted by the project. The NCDOT recognizes the need to provide mitigation for the acreage of anticipated impacts. As you know, a potential mitigation site has been located in Sampson County. However, they require additional field checking before a determination of suitability can be made. The NCDOT welcomes and encourages the assistance of your agency in this matter. The NCDOT is prepared to commit conceptually to mitigation guidelines for 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. These guidelines have been coordinated with your agency for other NCDOT projects, and were included with our previous application. Attached are the permit application and drawings depicting the proposed work. By copy of this letter we are also notifying the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management of the revisions. If you need additional information about this project please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at (919) 733-9770. Since lye, B.J. 0' uinn, .E. Assi nt-Ma ger Planning and Environmental Branch cc: Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Project Management Unit Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design Mr. W.F. Rosser, P.E. Division 6 Engineer Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental APPLICATION FOR r PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR*FILL - WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION ESSEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT Otoirtmtnt or Adminlitrtt/on• Stltw of florlh rar'Ant Oootrtmtnt of the Army (GS 146-121 04nirtn4nt of lltturnf Rtrrircit a^1 Communrty?••-•+.f. -( Cnrrt of rnttn-rt. Wllmintlon Obtrsc (GS 113.229, Iva1s.3(a)(1),143.215.3(c), 1130--A (33 CFR 7119.370.329) Pleast type or print and fill in All blankt. If Information is not appllcable, so -'r--+c by t,lacint N/A in Wank. ATTN: 13. J. O'Quinn, PE, Assisl:anl: Branch Mnnarlcr, Planninr) & Environmental Branch 1. Applicant Information A. Name N. C. Dep,'sr.t:rnf nt of Tr.an por-Lal ion - Divi ,ion of Ili. ghway, Last First Middle 0. Address I' • O • Dox 25201 t Street, r. o. Box ot +.Mrt tzal .iqh, NorLh Carol ina 77611 (919) 733:--277r). City or Town State Zip Code Phone If. Location of Propostd Project: A. County Cumberland B. 1. City, town, community or landmark Fayetteville 2. Is proposed work within city limits! Yes XX No C. Creek, river, sound or bay upon which project is loeatrd or n west nar r:%>rxly of water to project Cape Fear River Descriptions of Project A. I. 1.laintrnAnce of existing project 2. New wort, New Relocation of NC 87 B. Purpose of cxcavation or fill 1. Aeu_ss channel length width d.rth 2. Boat basin length width depth 3. Fill area See Permits Icnrtli widllt deptl, 4. Other length width depth G 1. Bulkhead length- N/A _ Average distance waterward of M10 N/A 2. Type of bulkhead construction (material) _ N/A ` D. Excavated material (total for project) 1. Cubic yards _ 39, 195. 7 Type of material Roadway Fill C. Fill material to be placed below MHW (sec also VI. A) 1. Cubic yards _ 6,_882.9 7. Type of material N/A IV. Land Type, Disposal Area, and Construction Equipment: A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swoops or othe: -eland? 0. Does the disposal area include any marshland, Swamps or other wcllanj? 'rn _ C. D. 1. r. G. Yet No _ _No Disposal Aroa 1. Location N/A 2. Do you claim titre to disposal area!_ N/A Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in Ilow will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled __ BV Standard NCDOT Erosion Control Methods Type of cginipmcnt to be used Roadway Construction Equipment Will marshland be crossed in transporting equipment to project site.' 1• --. explain No V. fntendrd'Ua-,kof P'm)-et Arai (Daaitre) A. 1. Private N/A 2. Commercial- N/A 3. Housing Development or Industrial N/A 4. Othef State Highway For Public Use. 0. 1. Lot size(s) 2. Elevation of lot(s) above mean high water 3. Sail type and texture 4. Typc of building facilities or structures Roadway and Drainage Structure 5. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing _ N/A Planned N/A 0. Describe 6. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL CONiNJUNITY RURAL CONSERVATION OTHER (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis) VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality: A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of fill materials below mean high water? YesXXX No B. 1. Will any runoff or discharge enter adjacent waters as a rewlt of project activity or planned use of the area following project completion? Yes XX No 2. Type of discharge Rainfall Runoff 3. Location of discharge Into natural drainage channels VII. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A VIII. List permit numbers and iswe dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for work in project area, if applicable: N/A IX. Length of time required to complete project: N/A X. In addition to the completed application form, the following items must be provided: A. Attach a copy of the decd (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land. 4. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on 8%, X 11" white paper (see instruction booklet for details). Note: Original drawings preferred . only high quality copies accepted. C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113.229 (d))Enter date served D. List names and eornplete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below. See attached property owner sheet XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolina% approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. XII. Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli• cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel- opment activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing. DATE / ? ?? Ap licant's Signature 1 Ij•At`M I •,I• Y.11•ItAA 1r1.•11t , • - ? ? ?/ ,• A MITI 1-4 / •? e?t.•M ? SkA boom, .46 two" IV, r 1 .... tw C U ?' A N tlt.•1 , ...?. ••.r Ae« t • /J.1 M.:•: .. 1.7•I•I.y• i•• .a / ??. ?'?? '..1 ?, 1, 1 1 ? tv I M P S O . e MrlMll *? [ I S1 M I M 0 N `l?• 1 Yonlr./t t - r tv w. ' r.l. f-dit a i Cl mtoR* A. 1 . ,. .- ..- LMi[M..+ ,,??.. •'v.5yfy, ?fr"I ,'y'.. , Sr.•.••.? 1 1 t lurll •MNI Y.. 11 / 4 ?? ttM«LM 0-6Ir, Y f e..i.a , 1 (•Y? + . " ?IhDt MIIIS 1 Ct•• Cr••A ??. °, ptlin M . .011 j 1117 1-? \ ?AI•MI 1 . r • !I 1 11 1 r r ??Hlmltl• SCOTL 0 ,rln.T A•Ir.c iwil: r 1'r:' _ E (?• `04 M.r.M1 •? . ? - 1+.+•v7 TM« l? , ,L,, N•11 i? [•?, er. trr••,1 r? \ ?rN Ile .. ...v Arlw.•11 L?L+? .vN M.lt` / I>af MMf II S.MI ..I M.•YII. • f `• • , ip+ 1 11 . ? • ? +A?n 0.••)BEADE71 ' ?• s 111 .n /vC-b acle. 1 !7 '• ? fN. ( f. LAKES I '1111 .1 • ? •N.+. e,w 1 •- R . R B E 0 N st TE11.7.11. bl ... 1 tuNr'?.. 1 1 AI•' 7ACta t M.111/ 1 1 ' f ? Mt 11 1 It NA• I rtr f ? ? eR?E1?tY'1 'F REST . ? It& 6- a 4% it, 41 % O ) 10 $CAL( OF UK($ 0•K IKM EWALS A/V110e it M%" _ c..w ren I,Hr, 0 10 _ 70 N .0 ,e SCAR fN AKOMIT[eS OM( WCM IQUAL%AM110e E1 AAOKrtltS G•.t71 t MITI IS IQUAI 1011.1 ellolame2 1 •t ?L 7U V L 1 ~ rr ju. BEG. PROJ. o IIU .ryr ? •• ? 1111 I „ . • ? I I {•' rllf nU lIV W 111 V' 1• 1111 1»/ Y t _ •''1?' I J 1111 ,W - •r '•-j ' ?• ..r SITE SCALE W END PROJ. uixulf - --z_--I e`Ii7• ` SCALE ICM EN[AIICEMENTS 11••,1 1 H.C. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION - DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ,/1 •I CUMBERLAND COUNTY 1• PROJECT 8,250501 U•508CA I•IIIE ' C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE rf 1111 'n, , f L V ,Ifr 41 t+,• •, /' J? I $NEE1P Oft I SEPT. 92 r? M ?l F-'1 - Xho-11 Z//,/C ,? -f i I 14 I I Go I 0 I z Ira I I v _ N 0 E-+ < J L? ( ? J ^ cx:p , ? W O C _ -C ? ?- L--,b :10 , n v' Ce3 = ? s? V = W ? S U o +C I C'- co r._ a o l Ca. O z -.- ? 1 ? J N O E - a ?-- . Cx] co oo O p i N1 C-A Gl ?- U I V C" a £-- - n c.i U p m "? 2 C = I I i \L ?I O ? I rh ` \I r I •? fl , ?rrTV ? I 6 0 M a a ? N w ? ? g t t - J J U. 1- ? ?z z 'l. 0o to Q D ? 1 N _o w c/) s z = '~ ::;;m CAI ? - => ^+ r 1 oC ?G U a -C I C=. o o -I d-. O .+c -? z I T l N O O - GL I G- ?-.? Wp a0 ? 1 a Coll cm O MI C-1 x C 7 I A = C- I •_ • C-> C-1 o ?- c? ti C., C_7 o m Z" - ? s ?G o_. U C/1 MA TG11 L /NE 11 CL co 14ATC L/NC I ? I v ? N I I ?I I 1 I ? I a 1 I ? I A I \I U N o _ o W c"IzE? =E? ?c t7 w ? - o r I oC X U G ? I [.. c-A o -1 C.- C-1 O x -? ? I `? J N O + ? R + d+ I O.. v] m O '-'1' 1 C-A ?-+ x E-- -a I A ? ? U I .-+ U w a ?-- o -? w v o m :..s oC X X d.. U c? MA TCI-1 L /NF C 1 \ 1 J ? O I I \ a W ? I A N - I 112l dW x ... - rN ? o C- F ss Q U - oc Q. ?'• ?? oo o a? 1 ?,.' 'Wn E--. c? ^c s v z a H (.l 7 oC s? ?G U o o -d I cs. CID 1 !d" Cw- C.. O c? z -? z I - G n. 3 C 2 p ? . va . J o N C c.A oo m 6 O o?. I p t _ 1 - ca -. ? ?-+ x -• = V U W 1 0 - U - A ?-a p ? C.3 ao :.? X MATCH L/iYE -1? ???? fY3 \ 1 u I ? W I - 1 I O \ `w I ` M oD \\v1I 'I. A I ? I Q1 ?? - _71V1 7 h?21 VW o Q _. W or ?- H va :t .c ? E- c7 = w oC S U o -G I H .ts Ca. OC) 1 C? O .c Z I T? ._ N O O oG a-- 1 E-- ?-+ w Op = 1 ar c? on o 1 w .--. x H --3 I v ?- ? v I C] O m - ac : C X C3- U Cr) &ATCN L /NC - E Gam' I CV ? O ? I 00 I I 'l. W A ?- 3N1 ? H.-21dUV <t }- - V CL i o y w C V G.1 oC ?G V O -? I F. . cs C.L. C)C) I G.. v o I C].. O z -? z 1 l C-:-c? O s-" C-3 CIO a V] CX3 p I Ga ?- O v 1 S - 4 V Cs3 0 C- Ci '- s Cs 3 V p m Z.-I cx: Z Z CL V C/ MA TC N L l NE F I j I I 1 ? u 1 • 01:1- k I 1 \ I 1n ? \ \I A I ?\I -71Y1 7 H.71 t1'W - - MATCH L /NE - 0,41 i "I V V t q J? I i _. -- INFT/11NOS ® DENOTES FILL IN WETLANDS, SCALE V W MILAN VIEW I? 1 I kc:D i M. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUNDERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,24 0301 U-508CA C 0 D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET_ 3__OF_18__ SEPT. 92 J al;zx 1 ? I w P z M a d a 1 m V W V V N o ? MATCH LINE- A - °c? }' ° } W I s c? ? w oC E-+ s V o C -? 1 C... co I Cam. a o -- I Z J N O I E-+ O ?-. Ct_ w co 1 1 co ?--. v w 0 ?-- (n - U ca --? p c? m Z..] U X c:S Q. S V C n I M O V - 1 W c 3 0 a I o I /z s R z Q Q J ? F- W ? -- v ? tG I h h m rL I ' ` Q O I? I M ? I I I lD U .w.a U ? N U ? O W ?T, Co ,,0 0 C O O o o 0 -9- 9N II H :)1dW I lZ F- L J 0 Z Q J F- W W I O Q I IY l7 I O I c I rl I I I I I I 0 IO O 0 U- u V 5 O J lL C? J a 0 I-\? - d - 3NIl H:)IVV4 M rn I (DO O C7) 00 I- z ? 0 Ln a ? r ? F U) - :iom L7 C-1 oC S v o ?C I OD ?c> Cs.. I I ] N Q '? Q L ? d. 1 --- 6-• ._ . w o0 = I a. C/? m p -1 a y = v 1 ?-? U C-=-1 0 G • 4=7A ?- W U O m :s] cL V C/! M ?l F? 1r?1 CV _ W f7l a O U O N o c N o ? E-? Q J -"G U J D- MATCH LINE -C - oC ?- o y LIJ I lL c? = w I U oc rr• ? V o «, -G I cy. COI cx. a o -I X ?? N O I r E-- or ?-+ f/] w C3 oo p 1 CD Nl Z o v I I LL - ca --? w I V p m ;.] cl- co-1 00 - - -- - I } 1 ? J a w I o I - ? I H- T ?- I a O J oc I CL - z I - Lli I I I O I - W ? ? O I I U R.1 ? W O U I ' T J I o ?n ? i o .-r -9'- 3 NI-] HDIVA - ? ? o ° 0? ¢ - r? MATCH LINE - C - M _ ?- O ..? LIJ CV C/-j S t =b E-- - c = c> > w I ?A v? c C S V O ?y? -tC W I V u o.. CJ . 0 O z O -.r ?" 1 S I v O - -.C = J p a? N - O C3- - cr CAI ?_. r/3 co co CD 1 O I`?1 I ? c? y ? v I C-> ?-+ c.> w O o ?-- m Z..a l7 lL - ?C C C" S V ?/] z Wo CV I cr ? >- J Q CL o ct - a. y S ~ O J N CV - 0 z J W - ?T 1 1 ? ® o ? I O CV - w o J ? c? 1 . I N W ?' PJ C ' T - '-D- 3N 11 HC1VN •- O O O o 0 00 F'*-- MATCH LINE - E - ti N - LO - N , N - N - W - w Ed O .a ? U u P 0. c M a ' N - L" 0 L-J 0 -0 - 3 N I I HXVN O O co O o ?. Q Cl J ?G U --7 ott, Y O ? W E--- Z C-:7 _ G+1 z v o -CSI ?. Ga. O r? 2 o Y - i Z 1 S ] N O - E r a O ?-. cr= C-A co Cal C].. I i c> Ln, Csl o ? -+ ?- ?C s? U - I 1 ?-+ 4=6 U C-LI C.3 ? x x Cl- V C!) 1 oo Soso-n 80J IJN83d SON VIOM 33S 3N1I Ho1VYV OD N i to 0 z Q J I-- W O ..J Z tn 0 z J 1- w of 0 w 0 Q cr 0 a' O cc a O O ?•l Q) Iz•LLfL) -?- V v I O 00 I cV LD - I o 3 1. 2 U - 3- 3 N I l FOIVkN O O CO 'N s? C AAA i? - W W s< • m x ? a O U_ ? c 0 OC o c N o ? c? Q -? -; -? v n W CL ? e- E- va S =C C- ::;C U a t? "C I.-a U 7-- U ?y? I H S ? Cs. W 1 Cm- anl ?c -.r z i C.- C> -{ -•- ?-+ s . J C?J E-+ O C-3 ao 1 ?.., nr c.I m I } d }- rJ I a-4 U C. j a E-- 0 0 C.3 Q $ _ V O m :cJ oC Z O C1. U V] C\j N a o a.. Q U) N ;-4 OD 0 ? ?od (zz O ?Si O O O 0? 00 EARTH QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.8 AC. FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2 9 2 5.9 TOTAL FILL 37 4912.7 C.Y. C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNERS NAME Aldolphus Turner Estate 1 2 3 4 W. Greg Sutton Mary Sutton Estate ULDDRE.45 C/O Lillian I. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6204 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 24305 C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305- 5273 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1829 S,nnundP ...m..?, - wn pe,?n( ., 7 t ? 1( Ilr SLV?n(1 1 7 \v1 l- me• '' / , LI I. 1 puul Sp.nsf 1.,'T, r. rn 1 •°ef )o,snsOnr,Ur , ) l nd s y wb (sfl-Dod \ VsNr Into" j, wtU Ind t ? /?.A/er?r. r ` J ' -? /• ? ) ? Sul onl ?-? I r'. L , 7 ?/-\1 ? sssnl fSe'it« . M , ?I .• 'f 1a,.x. 1Cn.?'f + It w.at 1 ?i1 v /'v .'(' PmslnNfl u1Rtlf11 PInES Spun( l7 R,R'r? ' io .1L?? I:+ „ _ t•n 1 Arrnr, Abe,e Ill I• 1061 Y•1G-1...-rv••'. „ ?'r P•^e, •.01 I O.lilr ?t• v.1.? P-blufl,,doa '' ?'a)E119y1?1 a.,• M P S 0• N {A1 MeaNMAn11 I LI'f _ K E 1 SITE /? JI Cs`Jj? 4k ,.n J! _ O Wi. 1'? : 1'(..' p 1 (' ) , l,lrmou. * r I M 0 N (,?• sAonlrofe i y9 Ysnd» ' A Ir,.dlr 1 '? CIIntORM ?! r1ollAls^ ?y\. 'C ?nD«ISn T •,a ;' 1 , Sled a,., Mu 1N ? ;M \` I?mOpUnd ' , Ill.oll n.,arl ao.un?I ` r t Milk esr?ao' • [eln sr I MII Coda, CtH? 4'\. V OC7?IRtl1) \ ,1 im. -.*#}ten '` Uu •rrsch .b / Ps,tlon? (on. •t< SCOTT D r l- D« r ?)H7mitl# ,tesp,m Anl?oc fi ndlr r ., \ ' • P , '-t{,1 '^?T ,?r•• All /W u, J Ingo - T) ?OIJ Il undl t, /? , --- ' Snsvun no, 1 , llus.. 4 1 (1R 1°De.ma ,1 ,%` - Sd? ft n .?•' 2 S ` a.A \ l.rs, ll:v .. ... ?mmm G•?I rnJ iri.fr sad Ill', '(3911RI?11(t 11 Snnl ,ul(? , 1 ST _ ..7 e 1 Is R'ur??E" 1 "bIADEN Ili ' 19 11,N. (}1 vTrlr GIDS9 s.tl,n 77 re, met, LAKES ` L I '1.Ifso^ .IS • I, /rn Us flue , ? - , Fyn r Tomlom s ' I°ens 1 is r? Q ``l 1 ! wn?lt G 7. f ;01 ,d R B n E FII N 1 u `,' SPATE LAS _ (.? r' steel r/_ r ?' ' `net rr..• R«, Akenl • Fr ose nuDh,r+ 11 1 . flit ;,.m,,.. ll/ II n 11 x -k 11r s... f u ST \ I.,,• .?1 r. .t . _' n? \ v aj llr netnl-, F R E Svdlt y ! ulRlerlolittl:- " A RJ 0 . ` N * C E3 ;16' 1.0 1A 1 , ? 1 I.sDUn ~ y7 `u y Nn..r..n. .s 1 (? • 17 - uu.sn 0 S 10 70 J ` - SWLI 01 Mll(S ON( INCH (O(IALS APPROA I7 MIIIS buslnn ArII, 1 p 1 _ --10` 70 7n 10 A' SCALE Of RILOM(T(RS ON( INCH (QOALS APPROA 21 tit OM(ILRS Ctu.nf 0 m- I Mll( IS fQUAI TO 11-01 AILOM(TIRS III ?? rJ lliS • e ` ? 'f/ II r.• ^ - f11 lilt Ina / , 17 Uo: b IN to nl ? 111. 1 Nt is r _ .? ? l1 • . . 4 •too•'. ,ur u•' 'i'IU I . M. IL III I'f' ?` »" I lu, 'L ? ? ? , • •.. • • t7 f' 1 ., I\I .. Y tew 1.u loo ?? _ SITES SCALES r DEG. PROS. ' ?t13:11II1 4 mitts I MILL L7 -r- t °v 7i7• SITES LESS THAN `L SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS ONE ACRE ' x . TIN E' lilt I N. C. DEPT. OF TIt 1 ° I 1,- to l,» DIVISION 01' 1I1GI1WAYS END PROD. CUM1113RLAND COUNTY r o. I ue7 1RItOii;lur 8.2440501, U-50801 ?• nLr ? r 1 E ' "" C 11 1) 1,001) IN 1'AYI;TTL'VILLG ,,e SI?IsEll -?- - Or 15 SEPT. 92 H AA? t-? H a A W H W w Cdr is 1 M1 W U H 'C i. o 'Ito 0,00', ---------------------- WILKI%5 ROAD -?--?-r O ???? N W n: 0 x a N O O 3 o n v. A w a d w i w a 0 w a U n w ? .. - C. s o , '? w ULli ) F O '0 I c, I O - 1' w O rA F, u n. O O -?? Q ? ?j O A I u ca a ? U H w li X 1 U O 1 1 ° ? O 1 ? ? X II ?J (D 1 4 1? c? ? 1 ?-?c I + W ? - w I v I Q + O ,.] U) N u I 0 ° o O 00 o LL' _ 0 0 l 0 Q 4- O _ c M o I Q a I I 1 I I R 1 Z 1 Li U) l ol 1 (n - . 8 - 2- GA H ? r q w9 N Q w ? H ' H CL Q r N LiJ J W c, s (n 0U ° 0 7 w E., a O O O r? U LSD > U O A 7 U 1L+d - L Lr) E-4 o w v / r O a q N U F z 0 N I N o w G) tom' ca `?: U r f -' W a x ° w .aa it C7 U o LCD L a ? E" O 'f: oo '7. H A ??-, D/ w ? ao A ?0 A A ? \\ U a. u w \ I I I I \ i \ I \ I z J T \ `I? \ .I \ \ ? \1 I n. a ?I I \CD I a I p I\ I\\\\I I + \I \"I\ \ I I Ln .I \ I\ \ \ \I ue) I \I ------- ------- -- I?---- 1\ \ \ I _ - o ? N o w 0) wu E. o w a_ W ti r- z W Q. w U) e° l U o ;.+ a r) w x ?. z C?l - o E~ O aD 7 ct, H w ? 0 7 w ? o, O `? r. °o I 0 A A A U \\ U a. \\ z ? x CIO 00 -1 I ` \l\ I I \ I I \I I \ \I 1 \ i ?\ \ -\ I 1 I \ l \ a i II\ y? \ I I I o o \I ? 'I \ ?`, \ \I \I\ \' \I I ? I z n. ? o ., I \I \\\ ? I I \A I I `I w I\ \ ? I o y? I • ?? \\ I\ \ \ \I C I \ ? I \ 1 \\I U 5 U `n 0 N ° o P57" tor) P4 -? H = I o W P4 W U o " .? q o L4 Ln r_.? W W CY" Ls, ? ci o oo X W ?`-1 W a a 0 U o ?` Q U O q Q7I \? Z U W cn 00 Ln 00 I ? \\ llr \ I I 3 + + I I? \ \ I \ \ I ? t \ I I ,I •,?\ I\I \ \ cv I I o I ? \ A. \\I I ? 1\ I\ \I \ I I I z o u z a I, I? ;\I\ \ \ u. , I I ? I x i a °? a \ I`\ \I \I\I ? I\ \ W `? I \I a a l a ? J ? I?\?\\ \?? \I I\ 1` A \ t \\ o a I lO \I ,? I\w \ I \\ \ I I I L, ? If \ NII U o N F", CL v, C7 U o V) ` f x o E: Ln ?Nj w R. GL ? cFO ? ? O ': ao 7 !--! G ? Q Q q ? p O w w ?I nn ti k-- A U O A A ? \ U w a x a 0 A p; o x U i I I I I ? I •n I I ? I a I 0 ? I a T I { U? I - c A z I I I I ? I 'i I _ ? I - z I I I z a I ?n I o ? I a I ? I ? a I I ?• c tD ? I \ I Or _ \\ \ I IU \ DUI O Q 0 ? m I I ?' , LL' ? x a z 7 w L1J ? I o w; . I mo' :s. ? ? _ I I p 7 w F a O > I w $ u O O o p x ? Q I > I I ? ? N I I kn I ? I N U I }- ?n a J 1 y - J 0. i Q n J N I ? O cU'v E I 0 O '• N a w Q> ? ? F" cn q . i I F -? x ? a o C? cn C7 U .- ?; Ltd I C? Cs. ;l. `r I a ? ' w a =I U W• I U W Q Q? ?v I ?w I I z L-L J I I I I L11 J I ? to ?n I c I I R O O a w QT F cn ca x ? ?. J C1. = J "? W (n U o R. 1^ E.., O a ai ? Ci. Q 7 O w F w U Q ? O O Q v, > U O A N _I. U C C4 ' W I I I U ..l 1 Q ? Q V U J Q 4C V 1 I O 1? y J I W I Fes- -Q, I J Q I U v N o 7fl N I I O O O ? ? QT) M Q O Of w V) a cl: I . o F" Q ? O F p 7 14 r ' .7 o _• 0 Q uj p U o n p Q v O x N w C) 0- L LLl L ,I O C? U (Jr) LC) _ a a p. Pr Q n i E +? O j (-4 Lli d U) co i z W ? a o L-J w4 I n 1 o a 0 SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL FILL WETLANDS(AC.) O.H.W.(CY.) (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 0 5,591 140 + 75 TO NATIONWIDE IA 142 + 00 -L- 26 0.6 0 69 145+00 TO INDIVIDUAL II 155 + 00 -L- 404 2.5 0 1,168 39 + 20 TO 40+00 III SERVICE RD 0.03 97 195 33 + 20 TO 35 + 45 IV SERVICE RD 0.23 740 900 27 + 50 TO 29 + 15 V SERVICE RD 0.28 900 1,400 21 + 00 TO 2G + 20 VI SERVICE RD 0.57 1,800 2,260 11 + 40 TO 13+00 VII SERVICE RD 0.13 420 800 5.G4 3,957 12,383 n ? H PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Cumberland County Redevel" Fayetteville, NC opment Center County of Cumberland 1 H. Lacy Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Road t$uite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 2 J. A. Holmes Estate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 3 John Sinclair Perry Estate 587-0 Windinx Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 4 D. L. Perry Estate 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 5 Grady R. Jackson, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 28305 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT November 24, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO: Tommy Stevens Fayetteville Regional Office FROM: John DorneyG RE: 401 Certification Review NOV 25 1992 - -) ENV. MANAGEMENT FAYETTEVILLE REG. 0trjcr Please review the enclosed 401 Certification applications by December 24, 1992. Please call me if you or your staff have any questions, or need assistance in these reviews. PLEASE COMPLETE THE NEW STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FORM 1. NC DOT - CBD Loop (Again) #92359 Cumberland County 2. Eldridge R. Johnson II #92667 Moore County The other enclosed material (if any) is for your general information and use as appropriate. Enclosure WILMINGTO N DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 93 Li?QI'"1Jiy- DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 July 9, 1993 IN REPLY REFER TO 1 Regulatory Branch Action ID. 199202767 and State Project # 8.2440501, (TIP # U-0508CA and U- 0508CB) Central Business District Loop, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Mr. Jack Ward State of North Carolina Department of Transportation Post Office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 Dear Mr. Ward: Please reference our letter to you dated February 11, 1993 and March 18, 1993 in which we requested additional information concerning the various build alternatives that were considered during planning and design of the above referenced project. Specifically, we requested that you evaluate two design modifications including (1), bridging the area between Wilkes Road and US 301 and (2), shifting the proposed alignment north towards existing (old) NC 87. In your letter dated May 20, 1993, you provided a summary of additional costs associated with these design changes, the time delay associated with implementation of these changes, additional relocations of homes and businesses, reduction in wetland impacts associated with these modifications, and any additional environmental documentation that would be necessary. We have reviewed this information and do not agree that the proposed alignment is the least environmentally damaging alternative; however, it appears to be the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative based on the evaluation of the these economic and relocation factors. As you are aware, the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Department of the Army and the Environmental Protection Agency established procedures to determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) guidelines. This MOA provides for first, avoiding impacts to waters and wetlands through the selection of the least damaging, practical alternative; second, taking appropriate and practical steps to minimize impacts on waters and wetlands; and finally, compensating for any remaining unavoidable impacts to the extent appropriate and practical. It is our understanding that NC DOT proposes to mitigate adverse impacts to wetlands associated with this project by debiting the proposed Sampson County Mitigation Bank adjacent to the South River. You should submit a conceptual mitigation plan indicating the appropriate debit in accordance with acceptable ratios based on acreages that have met the prescribed success criteria for creation, restoration, or enhancement of degraded wetlands. Upon our approval, this information will be included in your Department of the Army Permit. -2- Any questions regarding this matter may be directed to Mr. McLendon of my staff at (919) 251-4725. Sincerely, G. Wayne Wright Chief, Regulatory Branch Copies Furnished: Mr. John Parker North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ,,Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Mr. Ken Averitte Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Wachovia Building Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 Mr. David Yow North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Post Office Box 118 Northside, North Carolina 27564 Mr. Mark Bowers National Marine Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Division 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief Wetlands Section Wetland, Oceans and Watersheds Branch Region IV Environmental Protection Agency 345 Courtland Street Atlanta, Georgia 303635 State of North Carolina Department of Environment, 71, Health and Natural Resources 4 ° o Division of Environmental Management James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, , Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director August 9, 1993 Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: SUBJECT: Revised 401 Certification for Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359, COE #199202767, TIP #U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County On 30 July 1992, The Division of Environmental Management issued Water Quality Certification Number 2766 for the above mentioned project. According to your 14 July 1993 letter, DOT has revised the wetland mitigation plan condition No. 2 of the 401 Certification No. 2766 is hereby modified to read "Wetland mitigation shall be accomplished following Corps requirements" DEM shall be copied on all annual reports for this mitigation. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, &Jo oward, P.E. Jr. cbdrev.ltr cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. John Parker Central Files P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 501 recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper V k r7w ",° ' 4 ? 1- DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 1. T.I.P. No. R201-B (1979) alternatives analysis. a. Widening existing NC 87 involved many relocations; IN REPLY REFER TO Regulatory Branch March 29, 1993 Action ID. 199202767 and State Project # 8.2440501, (TIP # U-0508CA and U- 0508CB) Central Business District Loop, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Mr. Jack Ward D L5 l5 0 U E +. State of North Carolina Department of Transportation uAD Post Office Box 25201 I'WR Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 1 1 a Dear Mr. Ward: Reference our letter dated February 18, 1993, concerning the subject project involving the relocation of NC Highway 87 from East Mountain Drive S.R. 2283 to US Highway 301 in Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Recent receipt of a copy of the original Final Negative Declaration (State Project 6.804344, R201-3) for the proposed work completed the necessary information to allow us to consider whether the proposed relocation alignment is the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. Following is a summary of pertinent information taken from the R201-B document and other environmental documents associated with highway projects directly affecting the choice of the preferred alternative for the proposed work: b. Widening existing NC 87 was not compatible with the Fayetteville Thoroughfare Plan which shows NC 87 as a freeway from Rockfish Creek to US Highway 301; c. `The relocation of NC 87 from Rockfish Creek to East Mountain Drive in conjunction with the construction of I-95 made widening existing NC 87 from East Mountain Drive to US 301 incompatible with existing projects (e.g. CBD Loop T.I.P. U-508); d. Using East Mountain Drive as a connector to existing NC 87 would create an unacceptable discontinuity in the alignment of the new road; 2. Project I-95. The plans for this project included the existing relocation of NC 87 from I-95 to East Mountain Drive. 3. T.I.P. U-508. ?AA?tT"' At JLi.T 9'F iµ v='a"y`,. a . -2- 1 , a. This project is part of the proposed CBD Loop. It is designed to connect with the proposed NC 87 Relocation (R201B) just north of Wilkes Road. The 1983 document for this project stated that right-of-way acquisition had not been scheduled at that time for R201B. Because of this, a temporary connection was proposed (for U-508CB) between SR 2210 and US 301 to allow improvements for the 301 interchange; b. Alternative locations for a freeway between the established termini were investigated and were narrowed to a single corridor to take advantage of what little undeveloped land existed in the project area. This corridor also took advantage of undeveloped property purchased in advance by NCDOT in anticipation of the proposed action. 4. T.I.P. Numbers U508CA and U508CB a. The "Reevaluation of Final Negative Declaration for U-508CB (dated November 25, 1991) recognized 26.9 acres of wetland impacts within the proposed alignment. Verified wetland impacts reduced this to 13.2 acres for which DOT is prepared to commit conceptually to mitigation guidelines for bottomland hardwood habitat on a 2:1 acreage basis; b. The application transmittal letter dated July 17, 1992, stAf-ed that "the new location corridor was selected primarily to tie in with existing and proposed roadways." Prior evaluations had ruled out other alternatives for reasons that included incompatibility with area transportation plans, safety, cost, and impacts on existing development along the roadway. Our analysis of this information indicates that the proposed alignment may not be the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative. A primary reason for building on your preferred corridor is based on tieing it in with proposed and existing alignments of related projects to the north and south. Recognizing the obvious practicability of connecting to these projects at those points, we feel that there are other design and corridor alternatives that should be considered to minimize environmental impacts. These alternatives would not be incompatible with area transportation plans, safety, or impacts on existing development along the highway. The following design modifications are submitted for your consideration: A. Curve chosen corridor slightly eastward in the Wilkes Road vicinity to avoid wetlands in such a way as to allow connection as proposed with U-508 at US 301. Reviewing your aerial photography, this slight realignment should not entail additional relocations above what is currently projected in this essentially undeveloped area. If already purchased, the existing ROW might be traded for the needed corridor acreage or sold to balance the cost of this alignment adjustment; or B. Most of the wetlands are present north of Wilkes Road in the area of the landfill. Bridging this area would avoid most of the wetland impacts, reduce the amount of compensatory mitigation, and avoid any scheduling delays or costs associated with realignment as discussed in "A" above; 'rL4711N'f1MM7N-Y?Mih1'M "E9f9.r d^T 'JiSFRTlF I?ep ' -3- Based on the information at hand, we cannot agree that the chosen construction corridor in its present design or alignment is the least environmentally damaging, practical alternative. Any questions regarding this matter may be directed to Mr. Scott McLendon of my staff at (919) 251-4725. Sincerely, G. Wayne Wright Chief, Regulatory Branch Copies Furnished: Mr. John Parker North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 ,ir. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Mr. Ken Averitte Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Wachovia Building Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 Mr. Roy Shelton District Engineer Federal Higway Administration 310 New Bern Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Enhancement Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 Mr. Thomas Welborn, Chief U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV Wetlands Regulatory Unit 345 Courtland Street, NE. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Mr. Mark Bowers National Marine Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Division 101 Pivers Island Road Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 Mr. David Yow North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Post Office Box 118 Northside, North Carolina 27564 0/'- '-Z ( ?9 3 Fayetteville Cumberland TIP# U-0508C, State NCDOT Contact: CBD Loop County Project# 8.2440501 Gordon Cashin 1/17/92 6/26/92 Application submitted for 404 Individual Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification. This application included 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. NCDOT proposed appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank as mitigation. 7/17/92 Submitted new application including both project sections (CA and CB). Includes revised total wetland impact of 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. Also included mitigation guidelines for bottomland hardwood restoration, as Company Swamp is inappropriate for this project. NCDOT is looking for a suitable mitigation site. 7/30/92 Public Notice issued 8/20/92 Site visit made with the Corps of Engineers (COE), Division of Environmental Management, and National Marine Fisheries Service. Revisions to the wetland limits were suggested. 10/7/92 Comments received from the COE regarding revisions to the wetland limits. These comments were relayed to the Hydraulics Unit. 10/14/92 Site visit made to potential mitigation site in Sampson County with COE. 11/3/92 Revised permit application sent to the COE. Acreage of impact increased to 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat and 1.24 acres of pond habitat. 11/10/92 Site visit made to proposed mitigation site with the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service. 11/16/92 Conceptual Mitigation Plan distibuted. Option to buy and permission to enter for proposed mitigation site to be signed in the next few days. This will allow surveys and aerial photography to proceed. 12/10/92 DEM issued 401 Water Quality Certification G' ?. AATL' h ?t _ Rwr? State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary December 10, 1992 Acting Director Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: Subject: Revised 401 Certification for Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359, COE # 199202767, TIP #U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County On 30 July 1992, the Division of Environmental Management issued Water Quality Certification Number 2766 for the abovementioned project. According to your 3 November 1992 letter, DOT has recalculated the wetland impact to total 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood forest and 1.24 acres of ponds. Water Quality Certification Number 2766 is hereby modified to reflect these revised wetland and pond acreage. We will also need to be kept informed of any further progress concerning wetland mitigation for this project,. This information can be directed to Mr. Ron Ferrell at 733-1786. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, reston Howard, P.E. Jr. cbdrev.ltr cc: Wilmington Distric Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. Ron Ferrell Mr. John Parker REGIONAL OFFICES Asheville Fa; tpI;al F??#g- ville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 9 19/486-154 1 704/663-1699 919/571-4700 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer M DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1890 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890 IN REPLY REFER TO Regulatory Branch October 7, 1992 Action ID. 199202767 and State Project No. 8.2440501, (TIP No. U-0508CA and U-0508CB) Central Business District Loop, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. !I' Nil VLMM?1105vg% Mr. Jack Ward Sta te of North Carolina Department of Transportation Post office Box 25201 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201 U1'. Dear Mr. Ward: This letter confirms the August 20, 1992 meeting between Mr. Scott McLendon of my staff and Messrs. Gordin Cashin and Andrew Nottingham of the North Carolina Department of Transportation. Also present were Mr. Ken Averitte of the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management and Mr. Mark Bowers of the National Marine Fisheries Service. The purpose of this meeting was to determine if the location and extent of waters and wetlands subject to Department of the Army (DA) Permitting Authority were accurately depicted on the plans submitted with the permit application for the above referenced project. Based upon the site investigation and discussion with Messrs. Cashin and Nottingham, I am providing the following information to be used in updating and correcting wetland impacts associated with this project. The following comments pertain only to TIP U-0508CA (Wilkes Road north to Existing NC 87): 1. Wetland limits should be extended from Station 111 + 00 to 107 + 00. DOT staff should determine if wetlands extend across the entire corridor width in this area. 2. The portion of Wilkes Road and associated shoulder area indicated as wetlands on the plan sheets should be removed and wetland impacts adjusted accordingly. The following comments pertain only to TIP U-0508CB (Wilkes Road south to East Mountain Drive: 1. Site IA. Wetland limits should be extended from Station 141 + 12 to 140 + 75 and from 141 + 52 to 142 + 00. 2. Site II. Clarification of impacts (e.g., mechanized landclearing), associated with construction of the median between proposed N.C. 87 and the service road should be provided. -2- 3. Location and dimensions should be provided on ditches that will be constructed in wetland areas. Ditches and surrounding areas adversely impacted through drainage should be included in the impact assessment. 4. Several small impoundments were noted on design plans and were observed during the site investigation. Impacts associated with the draining or filling of these areas should be provided. Questions or comments may be addressed to Mr. Scott McLendon, Wilmington Regulatory Field office, telephone (919) 251-4725. Sincerely, Copies Furnished: Mr. John Parker North Carolina Department Environment, Health and Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Section Division of Environmental North Carolina Department \r" Environment, Health and Y Natural Resources Post Office Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina G. Wayne Wright Chief, Regulatory Branch Mr. David Yow of North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Post Office Box 118 Northside, North Carolina 27564 27611-7687 Mr. Mark Bowers National Marine Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Division 101 Pivers Island Road Management Beaufort, North Carolina 28516 of Ms. L. K. (Mike) Gantt U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Enhancement 27611-7687 Post Office Box 33726 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726 Mr. Ken Averitte Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources 225 Green Street, Suite 714 Wachovia Building Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region IV Wetlands Regulatory Unit, 345 Courtland Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30365 Fayetteville Cumberland TIP# U-0508C, State NCDOT Contact: CBD Loop County Project# 8.2440501 Gordon Cashin 10/15/92 6/26/92 Application submitted for 404 Individual Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification. This application included 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. NCDOT proposed appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank as mitigation. 7/17/92 Submitted new application including both project sections (CA and CB). Includes revised total wetland impact of 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. Also included mitigation guidelines for bottomland hardwood restoration, as Company Swamp is inappropriate for this project. NCDOT is looking for a suitable mitigation site. 7/30/92 Public Notice issued 8/20/92 Site visit made with the Corps of Engineers (COE), Division of Environmental Management, and National Marine Fisheries Service. Revisions to the wetland limits were suggested. 10/7/92 Comments received from the COE regarding revisions to the wetland limits. These comments were relayed to the Hydraulics Unit. 10/14/92 Site visit made to potential mitigation site in Sampson County with COE. Cdyv? : LAY! ?"( 511 E,! S f ? ? r- . Fayetteville CBD Loop Cumberland County TIP# U-0508C, State Project# 8.2440501 NCDOT Contact: Gordon Cashin 8/11/92 6/26/92 Application submitted for 404 Individual Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification. This application included 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. NCDOT proposed appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank as mitigation. 7/17/92 Submitted njeya_,appl_atio_n including both project sections (CA and CB). Includes revised total wetland impact of.11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. Also included mitigation guidelines for bottomland hardwood restoration, as Company Swamp is inappropriate for this project. NCDOT is looking for a suitable mitigation site. 7/30/92 Public Notice issued .. I A it 1 I I ))! tlr 1 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION ' END PROJ. DIVISION OF HIGHNAYS CUMBERLAND COUNTY ? i l!•a I11, ; i PROJECT 8.2440501, U-SOACII of ?_` ? l I .I„ C 3 D LOOP IN F.kYETTEVILLE I At.? SHEET 1 OF 15 JUNE 92 V .m N. YnO -?? Mn W:"'Y .v I III)- - \. ?/ AII* f ). • ;Wn1l • / -Op.l Say^•. '.101 .?, ? S" rt+fm Gw• •.f1 r Ipl,n•p„nll. r 1 1 b0 ?Inw. 1i nLYU.ooel `VtYY ? IIMA _. \ 111 w.Yl End rtiu..N. _y :oa.ln IY , Sui}?inl i1c, t4'•'AL -.?71 L/IN,Ir,' ?-^.••'ti••;?/".. •? /f? " / wset I• u •. ? 'u a.n.nMl•1 uLM[n Pins Sall Tit CaY? ° p r ,1 "?? ' /' . • 5 ^?'' r,,... uvR C U G !Y ?yL _ ?n...een 1 ..nt. ;.i1? ?JI 1 _J, t u WI / ' AbM Of efl hNl MA'-.l: I .• r. . ^ !, r I u1 ?T / P 0 "???1f VntO,ull COY }! y?f1.'V?,y?? dO 1 .I 1 /??11?7111 f. .\'. \ I tw, -lj• r.Il 1 a / A1AR•1 NwRAlt *?. \\VV I?F'1F•Y - ``' O K E rte,' 1 S ATE u7 1,? MIT In 'r 1 MOnHOR• S - Nre•, 1 4uH....lt ?Irmo?- ?H J 'A N ' . .` .._ 1r011?M 'y .•4.?rN1 ?yTOf.l 1:. $tYOflun ? +t13?' fo.oll ON ON MMaI ) - q.tIP6 O p«'/fir ?' 1 1 .. ,QOf10w0 -? •Co ne< Y11' au"tnam /J D. Nncn ? / .^an,an' Ynt III rHamlet* SCOT 0 rr•n "I'- R"oet 1 Sn.n v A i" 1 .nnn tl... Old untl)t . iw«nw ,•?. o.nn... ,+.J I A0 7 r? J?o Iwa, Hdf?rr `I = •+/nNr 79 I N #v.n?i •1 1 ?yon+, n IL ADE G.ot ? YIIOn 12 'tl..eN, I s?,rl SAKES r' 'Doan.., 1110 R B I E 1711 0 N 1 u a? STAtE rn.lt \ u. r?" MrCw I Y HI•L/ Pr o,ua _. rl' ? ? IYA„r • •? ` \ ,? S] ;.n.n?. r '[ <? 11?uotlnlw .r w) FOREST ? a `)rHl! ` rIJ7 ` A I tlA1NI6/ ?i.n. 1 B A 7 ' Iw 7i I - I \ ?? r Na '; 1 IIUtnOan l yl 51 tl •• t1 I` l? I?;__toan ~. (5] oo..n o S 10 M SCALE Of MILES ONE INCH IOUALS AP•tOa ;J NIL[3 • A1on 11 aeur I SCALE Of YILOW 11111 ONE INCH I.ALS A?/ROI 11 I,LOM(iCRS • r,r.e11 10 l0 ) 0 10 IR 1 M,LI IS IOUAL 10 1 601 M1.010MR5 ,LR, vn I 4 ~ I 111• I ; t ; I) ?•la VV :u 1 C E? SCALE i w J 1 , wllE3 SEG PROJ. t I n, •))' tl -? SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS rr? State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary July 30, 1992 Mr. Barney O'Quinn Planning and Environmental Branch N.C. Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25201 Raleigh, N.C. 27611-5201 Dear Mr. O'Quinn: A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E. Acting Director Subject: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act, Proposed CBD Loop in Fayetteville Project #92359., COE # 199202767, TIP # U-5-8CB, 8.2440501 Cumberland County Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 2766 issued to N.C. Department of Transportation dated July 30, 1992. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, reston Howard, Jr. P.E. sting Director 1 Attachments cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regional Office Fayetteville DEM Regional Office Mr. John Dorney Mr. John Parker Central Files REGIONAL OFFICES Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem 704/251-6208 919/486-1541 704/663-1699 9 19/7 33 -23 14 919/946-6481 919/395-3900 919/896-7007 Pollution Prevention Pays P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 'T'elephone 919-733-7015 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • NORTH CAROLINA Cumberland County CERTIFICATION THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500 to N.C. Department of Transportation pursuant to an application filed on the 2nd day of July, 1992 to construct a portion of the Central Business District Loop from SR 2210 to SR 2283 in Fayetteville. The Application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the waters of tributaries of the Cape Fear River and adjacent wetlands in conjunction with the proposed CBD Loop in Cumberland County will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth. Condition(s) of Certification: 1. That the activity be conducted in such a manner as to prevent significant increase in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (increases such that the turbidity in the Stream is 25 NTU's or less are not considered significant). 2. Wetland mitigation shall be accomplished according to DOT's submittal of 26 June 1992. Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification. ' This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal Permit. This the 30th day of July, 1992. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT eston Howard Jr,; P.E. A thing Director ?I WQC# 2766 J Fayetteville Cumberland TIP# U-0508C, State NCDOT Contact: 9/14/92 CBD Loop County Project# 8.2440501 Gordon Cashin 6/26/92 Application submitted for 404 Individual Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification. This application included 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. NCDOT proposed appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank as mitigation. 7/17/92 Submitted new application including both project sections (CA and CB). Includes revised total wetland impact of 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. Also included mitigation guidelines for bottomland hardwood restoration, as Company Swamp is inappropriate for this project. NCDOT is looking for a suitable mitigation site. 7/30/92 Public Notice issued 8/20/92 Site visit made with the Corps of Engineers (COE), Division of Environmental Management, and National Marine Fisheries Service. Revisions to the wetland limits were suggested. NCDOT expected to receive an official request from the COE about the recommended revisions, but we haven't received it yet. The revisions to the permit application have been made by the Hydraulics Unit, and are ready to be sent to the Environmental Unit. NCDOT has looked at several potential would like to visit them with the COE haven't been able to schedule a date - C/r . mitigation sites, and representative. We for this visit.- 10 ?; - Sot s?e z 1 , IK5/4 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 0 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188,919-733-3391 Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director MEMORANDUM TO: John Parker, Jr., Inland 11404" Coordinator Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources FROM: Dennis Stewart, Manager Habitat Conservation Program 4Wt? Date: September 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Response U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No. 2767 (August 12, 1992) in reference to the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposal for a new segment of the Fayetteville Central Business District (CBD) Loop, Cumberland County, North Carolina, TIP No. U-0508CA & CB. The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has completed a review of the proposed project and possible impacts on existing wildlife and fishery resources on the area. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). By copy of this memorandum, the NCWRC will also provide comment on the attending 401 Water Quality Certification to the N. C. Division of Environmental Management. The NCDOT plans to construct a four lane divided highway with full control of access from existing Highway 87 to East Mountain Drive (SR 2283), involving a loss of 11.3 acres of wetlands. In a recent interagency site inspection (August 20, 1992), the need for revision of wetland acreage estimates was demonstrated. Given the nature of surrounding land use, the NCWRC has no objection to issuance of a Section 404 Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification for the project, provided the following modifications are made: 1) Wetland acreage to be mitigated should be revised to reflect values determined in the recent site visit. Memo Page 2 September 1, 1992 2) The NCDOT should demonstrate that no opportunities exist for on-site mitigation of the anticipated wetland losses. The NCWRC appreciates the attempts of the NCDOT staff to coordinate site inspections for this and other projects. We encourage continued cooperation in resolving mitigation issues and propose that future site visits be scheduled prior to permit application. Thank you for the ongoing opportunity to provide input to planning stages for this project. If we can further assist your office, please call David Yow, Highway Project Coordinator, at (919) 528-9887. cc: Thomas Padgett, District 4 Wildlife Biologist Keith Ashley, District 4 Fisheries Biologist Ernie Jahnke, Manager, USAGE Field Office John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR David Yow, NCWRC Highway Coordinator DLS/DLY/lp ? 4 M1 r STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA I IZI]DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 JAMES G. MARTIN GOVERNOR June 26, 1992 THOMAS J. HARRELSON SECRETARY District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch ' q 9 I WA FR MIA Y .CjION _ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 1.44 miles from SR 2210 (Wilkes Road) to SR 2283 (TIP # U-508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501) Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. This project will consist of a four-lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways. The major goal of this project is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (1982) evaluated six new location alternatives for this purpose. Other alternatives were also considered during the planning stage, including a No-Build option and various combinations of existing and new location roadway. The proposed alignment was recommended for a variety of reasons discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement for the project. In general, the alternate was found to best meet the transportation requirements in the Fayetteville area at a reasonable cost and with a minimum of environmental impact. The proposed CBD Loop is part of the adopted Thoroughfare Plan for the Fayetteville Urban area. It is considered vital to the revitalization of downtown Fayetteville and will best meet the community objectives that have been established relative to the transportation network. An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management 225 North McDowell Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 James G. Martin, Governor Roger N. Schecter William W. Cohey, Jr., Secretary Director ... August 12, 1992 R ? r? IJ ?Ll 7---,. D L5 l MEMORANDUM WETLANDS GRUi i' WATER UALITY SLeri;,r; TO: Mr. A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Acting Director Division of Environmental Management FROM: John R. Parker, Jr. Inland "404" Coordinator SUBJECT: "404" Project Review The attached U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice for Action No_ 2767 dated July 30, 1992 describing a proposed project by the NC DOS', Div. of Highways, Cumberland County, is being circulated to interested state agencies for comments on applicable Section 404 and/or Section 10 permits. Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by August 31, 1992. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact me at 733-2293. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested. REPLY This office or s the project proposal. No comment. Comments on this project are attached. This office objects to the project as proposed. ?Signed i Date 11b 1 PU. Box 27687, Rilcigh, North ( aro him 1701 7687 'Ic[cph,w 919733-2293 -41M ! DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Action ID 199202767 July 30, 1992 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS (NCDOT), Post office Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT THE CAPE FEAR RIVER IN FAYETTEVILLE, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans submitted with the application show construction of a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. The work will involve construction of 2.54 miles of roadway consisting of a four lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways from existing NC Highway 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) (Projects U- 0508CA and U-0508CB). An estimated 45,036 cubic yards of fill material discharged at four locations will impact approximately 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood wetlands, including one 8.2 acre area . NCDOT proposes to compensate for lost wetlands on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. The purpose of the work is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. 14 The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess -3- impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the DEM for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after August 21, 1992. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 17, 1992, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Scott McLendon, until 4:15 p.m., August 31, 1992, or telephone (919) 251-4725 ••w r.l r•• Tyr r•r( i "1 i Sr 1 N 6.., _ 1 I 1M SY•Y1 a -a 1 , li r,M 1 MH , rH1 r Iwlwn..N. , - .MA r- ". w.%I ln1 . ` ^.'? MIw.+\ _ /M . ,r.MA^ 1 S?•'. .. Sb1 ?, ' I.4. / , 1 7• V? 1 ?.H...c1?i•I^ - .I ` Ira r.?V: .E ,ji 1«? 1 a. I .6.4 1 L? \,`?'f ,. f /S.i Y ?wld•w.l • OItr71 rMf! a // S¢W[ UI/ ,,1 CC A Air / wRr..•:..:..i.?. 1? ? I N•I11 ?•MW11 ' 1' I f 17t?1?'• •1T 1?• ?^ I M P S O N 1.. I CM I r,N O S `TE K E cwt ' ;? ' - 1 I M O N , IMRwtI°,. t ( . rJ ; ' Mr?.rNw.? «,-Iw . cInrtoR?F . vat Nr•Nr1 11r /1 I R.rl«? 1 /r" 1.?' ?•MM•. 1 1 c". 4N [Mwr Id,l. 1? a 4?M'? \ . O(lin(hl ? a?N11 ?` ? N•1 RC11 . '/ rr11M; ' Ir,° .1 . * * 11 \ ? rl It I I 1 vn?e. ? t I i .r ., I • ?1 I' ml/l• SCOT D ! r.'rr^ A.1 W !. `.? /• 1 I Art !\ r 7..wL ?r 4vow s w.rwl i r1. r • 1\ `QNNIPMI a P TMr ` ?.N l.? ial ?. _ RrO try^I, ?•` t.«•« '1 ,? /IWrw ?«' crlr^I 1 a' , 'f1 ?MMI 11 SR.^t ..r11 ' ,.I WdN•1f , SI MNdU ` • I all 0M •1lLADEN '1 R...Ir M z 1 1 (stew I IT r w,!*. LA ES It I I, I, '? , R g E O N St tE nrl,t. IRtcM 1 NR11 r/ • 7 Mr ?I 11 ,? \ III , I ?ti a ?* i 'k IwAr t 1••. 1 i REST a :\ c Itrlltl n ?': I` ?? v;?„ .a n a. •? ?? N ;1 t 1 ` Yr•• ? NIrM1 1 1 NInr1.M' 1 ••1 M '° 1 IMr•.w°'° ? l % 5 (1_w. !/1 y . 0 S Is t0 SM(O/ mLl1 Or1( Mm EQUALS AI?1101 I1 "KES ()M NA rw?r 1 SCAL( Of N1(06Kt(RS ON( rrldt IQUALS A"1101 71 NI ONE IM ci. 0 I0 70 )0 40 U , rill Is (Q11AL to 1 NI NILONI(T(NS •1 I 14 _w) 01r) • l ? v 1 `` 11?. At BEG PROJ. " •111 llf: "? IN p e 4.4, F 1 ,1 nd UV w 'i Irr, r 11 S, INr % ?? rer r,11 t1+1 SITE suEe o 1 t / . wyLli END PROJ . o----= W ?,' Q p 1 __ I Wl! °?li/• SCAL( FOR INI,AM•EMENTS • I EI u•I I N.C. DEPT( OF TRANSPORTATION Ir•• 11 IV 1 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS I,r "" r' CURBERLAND COUNTY " r PROJECT 8(2440301 U-L08CA "u C 8 D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE -1/lt L., SHEET 1 OF 16 12 -91 iIr N, 011 I ' —— __ __ ? / I 0 ? V T J N V) Z Z U Z = = E? w aG E--- z U o > - I cam. ., I L1a. r-- O Z ca 2 J o - r N I z I D 4 H w oo ::D 1 0- P a . va =0 o N I ., - C„> ca -? o w m "•3 - CL T C-> cl-I 1 L /NE A MA TG? I \ 1 I C1 I I J I N I ? - w a l\ I J ( I I I 1 I I ? 1 I I ,,l k? H /NF B MA TC x 0 E-- c-- cDt:: Z W i - U X l a- V Ca. O ?-. ca - Q C-) O> CDC) •- N o > ? W D o - 1 2 ?.- 1 J N Q w oo I U w a ?- ? w p m _.i oC T d. U [/) , y J \ co 00 \ I ? = 1 U I U O I I ? J I \ z I ? ? i ?a A N = I ?N? H 2-1 dW _ _- d - PLAN VIEW MATCH Z IIVE F I ,/ - r I I T T I ? ?i I W I v I i i (4? WF_ T/ ANDS L /FYI / r DENOTES FILL IN WYFLANDS SCALE 1" - w END S TA. 129 N.C. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CURBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,2140301 U-508CA C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE S H E E?_ 7__0 F_ 16_ 12 - 91 . k -1 Z I l `1 o _ U --3 co --.. i o? a- 0 7. CV CL 7. fr- ? f-+ - cl-I s x E-• 2 V W cG s v o -C I l E-+ .[-& CA- ? I cz. a > - I O ?C ?.r ?-? CA- Z: J !NJ Q O GL? - C1.. i-? ?-_.. W ao CL cn m p 00, C-3 ca >^ _ > U 1 ?-+ U W 0 V O m ;.i Y CY CL U s to I? W Y. a 0. 'l. W A o Q _ Ql H D1dW LC) - O\ tX ?C U Ca d I o - 6 + r-r W coo C3- CZ> :=> CX. rte, c1l"A ?--• m s E-- a ..._.? CT) I c1 ? A ? v ti W I L V ? O CY m :z] V c? 11 U - v W I Q Q 3 I U I O LL - F- O OC U > Q J I I r J Z Q ? - J W I 1 • I H? I I ? O U a x ° o O QI Q o ° m co I?- o E Q _ ? Ol - y- 3W I1 H DiWi n c E-+ J1 r U CO o ? I •---4 ?• N - c? z x = H I w ? E-+ -4 .- s O U -+ o ..cam r I +Z I [:. ? 1 O l9 U ?`' C.L. O ca Z 0 -r - I x 1 Z O I - E- n. C-3 =C O ?- . c? 7 cmr_l W w N - oo E O C_ I O 1 ? ca y ? -- U 1 v A ti Q ? W m C-3 x .C CL U c.r'i U y - v W I Q ? l7 I o J LL - ch 0 I cc I C) > Q J I r J V) Q I o rr) - - z a I - J 1- W I I ~ I N - W I C4 ? E? l 7 ?; I 0 U N `" a x ° o o o 0 0 Q> 00 (? 0 ?.. w L E-+ lJ C> OO J rn •---I 1 MAT CH LINE - D - CDC: - o ?2-- ---A -- rte. ? Z Z = H 'L U ? w Ln Cs a o - I o ? J N O - 6-- n O w C/3 m Cl7 O I OI . o Z A .'. v C-3 a C-•I I - v ca a W m c.L3 I - X aC ci. ? v c/] Q co - _J Q W I - C Q c lD h ? a O o - z Q J h W I l F? ? A o (Jo W O O O U O Ln -V- 3111-3 HD1dA - Q O o 0 CT) co M TCH LIN - C - ? - o H Ent Ent cz> m -< no. - c • Q v o .- =.-4 --I E _ Ql N CV cn z z -- E-- In c?G z U o I U ?-. c=. O a 2 -> o -.r ?. Z W I -I I Ln U Z^ ] N Q ? - w ao o I j a. Cdll m 3 O v - •--. v r? w a 1 E- J c> ca o m cN-) ;O l7 Li 2 a ca.- C_> _C cl-l Z w 0 Q' N Q - ? Q9 r J ? Q a ° 0 c[ - a ti r-- o J 0 Z J W o Cv - W o it Ch ? I U C1: PC I - 9- 3N I I H Dit/W - ioo < O O O o 0 (9) 00 r? o Q _ O? E » M C ra >- CO -4 CV M ATCH LINE C o } N - z C3 --=1 r-2 o?G ? V o ? I V) 11 Ca. Cs. o O 2 a -r _ 1 ? 1 U) l O cr-, N O r-t U - ?. o. ?-? w ?C3=1 ao 0 C> 3 - v .-4 C.] ca W ti C==3 E-- w o CK: m :.l ::3= ? IL x v w - OQ c? N ?./ cr > - a CL J o cr OL Q o - V) O o Z Q o ? F--r ?- X LLJ O o { - N 23 O U p ? M a 'n ? N - - D - 3Nl-1 H31dN - O l Q - o 00 0 - ? CF) o Q - _ Q? -t C.> --] I CX: ?- 0 3 N cvI x z E-- E r Z U --:31 Cil c? E-- x U o .cam -C [:.. ?? I I Cv- O ? v N O - - h O c : .-+ w M O I Ca-. C-2 CV3 m ?-• S E-- p -3 - I 0 =3- U 1 U Ca ra O m C" :i7 - ? x 90 Soso-n HOA lwja3d SONV-113M 33S 3N I -1 H 3lVil p? CV - 1 I I U W Q / U U I ? ?- a. 00 - w ° N J CC a I Q - pa a C z LAJ E ? J A o o .., N - - O- 3NI? IOiVYV - o 0 0 o 0 Q EARTH QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.2 AC. FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2 9 2 5.9 C.y. TOTAL FILL 35327.7 C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNERS NAME ADDRM 1 Aldolphus Turner Estate C/O Lillian 1. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6288 2 3 4 W. Greg Sutton Mary Sutton Estate 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 28305 C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305- 5273 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1829 un,n .n wn y,."y I '? I AIr Sly'^., bou, Sp'^K> IOI 6), ? N .C G,we rt ? bnntnn.nlr/ly 1 5 . 1 1 ?'Il r f.,lrood ?' Y.t, ? l,^d? 11..,r ?'l A.ewr+. Godwin Sul nnl W"I yl ' 1 1 /?.1 ? M.m lSttltl ? ..` I.q.^, /?l:wn.? of / ) I laa+t v,nrl„*I 1; u11M1TI Pines ^i•` ' Spin j Lakt • to [ C U ~ A Al I, Y,... ra r.n L .rnt ,WI /r Abrr re JU .r. w + r P 5 n N 1a.Nlr 1',nrblull., ,? ,• f •a?ottrrill `U: v, I,R Add A?" N«RD1, y ., *• , 4 -2SITE }i O K E { + _ - . _A- [ 1.,tmbw r ?l ? -' Cllntoll* •0I, . M O N Mo."". S r IVUw« NoIIrR.n se.5vrtil t ?C,Cnbr.l in Sle,l- , t lawn Dt?eri Mr,,1 / RAela6 + A .? 'itope Milts C,d., r ti, J ockingha \ DL ,,.rn `i P.1 Joni ' len, 511 t* (1 1 wMt ttj SCT 11 r.. 9, :ld D t/ e'+ An Vert L „Ib r +PHaml' O - io. y M,.. I,,,.+ U ( Sn An, un IoD«ma 1"? ,.. rl... (? ?1T IOld nu,ld,e :p,nYt 1 ., 1. ll.v. v 1?,rvnon `. Nrd ) 9rnn ?, Gl.o ,V H It •t)M l??llf t Ilr r S„^I wI? `` ` )J ' ,' ^ `. N / 1 r"Nr [) t1 w,.,,n. 1 ' 1B L A DE I9 I • '' Au1mb , ' T Ylh,lr O., ,Qp(-!•' neon ON /7 rr,`,rN , tVn LAKES I ,> 1 Inm.n,d G,b+ ( MAton • .,., 5' AIm. Ru,e , I' z o? loran, tl ,, N wn,le ra j / I10) R B E ` I1 91' 1 E l,. e.,, ' tbI „? 711 Dubad?,. 1 IMhd ?. u Mc CuI r1.tJ P ,o.r al, , i + AI , ,Ifs 1 ...` I ., .'>'_• S1 N,r^„ ,, ' * r El,nbrlnlwi, ,f "- r -FOREST Ville Flerit D" I,e J n,Id 1 ' 171Ad rona,o l,fbon )) f AIL l ,, ? , ji1 uo. Jn 0 5 10 10, SCALE Of MILES ONE INCH EQUALS APPROA IJ MILES ?Cl.,.lnn Melly r -- SCAT( OF RILOM[IERS ENIE INCN EQUALS APIROA 71 KII OM(I[RS/yam C. ,I 0 10 70 JO AO As 1 Mlll IS IQUAL 10 1 6" KILOMETERS ZII ?l, 0 WEIR 1 . ,.. o' / Iti Ulr raw l - 0" •` 111/55/5/ , f/ .111 ,I/- n,l Ill? r 111 1111 1)' l , . ?r t,o o$lily 1,/1 1Pr 1l0• rlu I rEo [3EG . PROJ. 4 I low' ti ? - - tN J low SITES SCALE Q 0 1 7 J 4 -ILE$ ?,? ?v. 7 I /.t R! I SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS "" e Il N. C. DEPT.OI' "T'RANSPORTATION' ,e l }'" 1 DIVISION OF HIGHR'AYS END PROJ. ° II CUMBERLAND COUNTY ' l W7 R, It PROJECT 8.2440501, U-SONG Il C B 1) 1,001' IN FAYPTTEVILLE S: + f SH EET ofJ 5 JUNE 92 1 -- 7A? C a H s ? z .a p? o A x a O x 0 0 a w 4) E"' ? F o W LLJ a z o w F o b ? z ?, O O U a O W r_ U O Q U U W z x c x U F w F 04 A W F W 1 1? 111 ?' I I? I I I? 11! ? I I 1? I I 1? I I 1? I I 1 WILKrs ROAD 1 Air - \ ac W o w C\j ? F" ?, ° ca 'Co l1J z - x z ? o o x ? -I a o CL cn W I A > A U Oct A ` U a. U W 1 ?, z x v O O C? LL- 1 Q 0 q w cr 9 1 T - > ' I- 0- z O ? O - H L ?{ I + 1 ? 0 ® - W W J) u ? x I .°n o ? ° o Q? 00 ( C\j W ? e: H ? W z F- O 0 Z O '? U 8 Q ; U a A a v ? a ? w O 3 o ., _ U w O Q ? ? c Q a $ ? . ?? E-4 E-q z ? Q w g? Q 1-4 I o ? I Z g - ..? w ? m z o o 00 v' a •r, % O W l V VY) b .? LLJ a .r, f ,? O W in I 0. ? W C..? W x U) I x I I I I I I 00 0`0 I z J i z ? I IIN I o - o x I a a o I a I I I I I I ? - Ln I I ? -- -I- I I I I I I _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. Q I I",- o I d I ??:= ? I x I I f I ? I I z l w I I H I Ln I ? I W I I x I I I I I I I -- n I a I I I I I I I I I I l `? I? i I I _ C\j o !I Q W v1 r 1 .?, GC l 1 J W cc z W LC) /? ?--? w `? Q % W E^ Q J 0.' W U W x IZT _ - - I I I m l--_ I I I I v F ? I I ? I ? I I ? ' I I I ? I I I ! I I I I I _ I Ln I ? o I I I , ' I I ? o ? I CD I I I I I I I? I ? Iu I I R.. I \ I 1 r. a0 ? a^0 U I IK I _I-?? ` I I 1 i z ' ? ? I l a o o x I l I I I ? . I \I ? x a I a °' I a I a I a I - I '? I W I x I I a `? ? ?? ?? I I I I I I I ? ? I I I I I I I I ? I ?: I I I I I I I I I ( I u? I i E- ? cn f.c7 (l, ? % ci r??- ?1 r, v c= / a O v, Q Q? F-• O n ? u Q Q ? 00 1 ?I a ? 'll I I ? I ?I F I II !I I I ? I ? I I I I N I I ?I I I o II ?I Q I c0 00 z u I ?I I I o o I k I x I g a l a x I'? i? I I ?' I x a l a I? ,I I I :?, I I t o o I i I J ? I ? .I l a CL l I ?, I I I I ,. I W ', I I ? I\?__ _ I c II I ' I I 1 ?I I I I I ??? ???I I I? I ? I I I I I _ _ ,_r- I Q W N r vv ss ?? F c ? °f; F- W W F y 0 ? E" j °O J G? O Q Q/ w Q U a O 0. Q ? C? W ti 4 ^a O? Q i U Q 0. 9 W U W x a a ca a O x o a a \ w I I I x F- I I W _3 I I I I - 'I _ cl) I I I I - I ? 00 I - I 00 I h U z Ll. I 0 U z f o I I I a ? I I o ? x i a I ??,? _ I l ? I 1 I- ? O I I - M n ? I I '3 T`.f >? ?CD?/ M + I I 1 I? I? I I I ?` I o \I gI I 3 I b v, a U Q; r W U Q 40 ? LIJ (L ?n N Q O I? i Po r-- -J z i lL 0 w W z z a ° -? x A LC)I ? E- 0 O Q U p O a ? ` w a ?I wG? ? A U O 0. A ? W U ? u. U u1 V 3 J ?J d J d w d W ,u J vl Q C? -J Q 0 a Li J > T ? \N .- O ?n I Q r lj ?w I ? I r L z J J O Cf- O w N ? f ` .n G W x F Q ? U z Cc, o O ca ? -' C4 U ? co u W O a z 8 ,.4 a ? U w o w W l? I? Q v Q v_ N r?z v? N C U I ? QJ ?1 U 0 ? z J I Ql- 3 I C - co w 0 o w N 0? a z x A U x ? x w ?, A ? a z U ? ? a 0. w w A LD - W J Q J r? v / Q v N ? d 0 N ? Q O + r? Q o G? ? y I g o Z ,,.?.,// A U x O ? A Q ? ? a ? lil n ? o L U 8 A na. ,? H U W Ch a Cn C/7 i d co z a w p4 z o 0 0 SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE: FILL IN II1.1. BELOW TOTA1, t" 11,1, WETLANDS(ACJ O.H.W.W11.) (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL. 0 5591 I 131+ 00 -L- 401 1.3 141+12 TO NATIONWIDF, 23 IA 141+ 52 -L- 14 0.2 0 145+00 TO INDIVIDUAL 0 1168 I I 155+ 00 -1,- 404 1.6 _ 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBER LAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE _ 2 kH,E,T J4 4 of 1? 1 JUNE 9 PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Cumberland County Redevel- Fayetteville, NC oprrrent Center County of Cumberland I H. Lacy Godwin Ertate 2521. Raeford Road Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 2 J. A. Holmer Ertate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 3 Jol,n Sinclair Berry Erta(e 587-0 Windint Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 1). L. Perry E.(.te 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 5 Grady It. Jackson, Jr. 1818 Manly Fayetteville, NC 28305 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAY'S CUMBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440601, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYET'TEVILLE SHEET 15 OF 15 JUNE 92, FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands Mitigation Proposal The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will insure that the mitigation site will exceed the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). NCDOT will document, using monitoring wells or visual observation, that this hydrology parameter has been met. Locations and numbers of monitoring wells, if utilized, will be established through coordination with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel. Installation of any wells will take place prior to planting. After grading of the site is completed, wetland tree species such as river birch (Betula ni ra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii), water oak (Quercus ni ra) and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will be planted on 8 foot centers to compensate for forested wetlands removed along the segment. Species compositions will be approximately equal. If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. NCDOT will be required to seed the mitigation area with grass immediately after grading to satisfy soil erosion regulations. Fertilizer and lime will be added to the area at this time. NCDOT will reapply these additives if it is deemed necessary prior to planting of the seedlings. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location o these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper elevation and grade, get permitting agency approval on the elevation 2. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality *river birch (Betula ni ra) *green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) *overcup oak (Quercus 1 ry ata) *swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) *water oak (Quercus ni ra) *black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) * If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with Corps personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. 3. Coordinate hydrologic sampling with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers** ** Hydrological sampling will take place periodically throughout the growing seasons until adequate hydrological conditions are met B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: Information from monitoring will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event - no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12% of the growing season) - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DATE TRANSMITTAL SLIP TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG. Mr. John Dorney Water Quality Planning ? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS ? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE ? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT COMMENTS: -? ?je- ? eq U, c) ?r r STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P.O. BOX 25201 RALEIGH 27611-5201 JAMES G. MARTIN November 3, 1992 GOVERNOR THOMAS J. HARRELSON SECRETARY District Engineer US Army Corps of Engineers PO Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402 ATTN: Regulatory Branch E07 I 0 f J-02 Vi&!_Ar?DS GROUT' WATER OIIALITY SECTI:? ! DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E. STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville, 2.54 miles from existing NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) TIP # U-508CA and U-0508CB, State Project Number 8.2440501 Dear Sir: Reference is made to our application of July 17, 1992 and your letter of October 7, 1992 regarding the proposed-extension of the Central Business Loop in Fayetteville. Your letter requested that the plan sheets be corrected to reflect wetland limits identified during a August 20, 1992 site visit. These corrections are included in the enclosed revised application package. The revisions indicate that the extent of wetland impact was underrepresented our previous application. Our first application ind' to a wetland impact of 11.3 acres. The revised drawings depic 13. acres of impact to bottomland hardwood wetlands. In ou etter, you requested that impacts to ponds be addressed in the application. The location of five sites of pond impact are indicated on Sheet 1 of 15 for project U-508CB. Fill amounts are summarized on Sheet 14 of 15. An estimated 1.24 acres of ponds will be impacted by the project. The NCDOT recognizes the need to provide mitigation for the acreage of anticipated impacts. As you know, a potential mitigation site has been located in Sampson County. However, they require additional field checking before a determination of suitability can be made. The NCDOT welcomes and encourages the assistance of your agency in this matter. The NCDOT is prepared to commit conceptually to mitigatr2-1) guidelines for 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat on acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. These guidelines have been coordinated with your agency for other NCDOT projects, and were included with our previous application. Attached are the permit application and drawings depicting the proposed work. By copy of this letter we are also notifying the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management of the revisions. If you need additional information about this project please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin at (919) 733-9770. Since ly,, B.J., O' uinn, E. Asst nt -14a ger Planning and Environmental Branch cc:vA?r. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR Mr. Kelly Barger, P.E., Project Management Unit Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design Mr. W.F. Rosser, P.E. Division 6 Engineer Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental AhnLICATI0N FOR PERMIT TO EXCAVATE AND/OR'FILL - WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION ESSEMENT IN LANDS COVERED BY WATER CAMA PERMIT FOR MAJOR DEVELOPMENT otptrtmtnt or Adminitlrtllon• Stale of florth rtrdlnt O.putmtnt of the Army (GS 146-111 04ptrtm"nt of Prtlurg Rtvrirc+t cry C,mmunkVa- 4*r* 4^t Crwpt of [r.tto-ri. Wllminglon Obtrle (GS 113.229, 143-113.7(+)(1), 143.213.3(c), 113-7-4 (33 CFR 209.)20-329) Pleast type or print and fill in all blanks. If Information is not appllc.3ble, so r*lc-rc by placing N/A in blank. ATTN' 5- J. OrQuinn, PE, AsslStant Bi-anch Mdlldcler, Planning & Environmental Branch 1 . APplicanllnformation A. Name N. C. Dep:irl:mrnt of ' ian7,porLal ton - DiVt`,joll of Ilidhwayr, Last 0, Address P • O • Box 2 S 2.0 1 First Middle t Street, P. o. Box of +.Ma I?.?lcighr North Carolina 27611 (919) 33 g7-Ifl City or Town State Zip Code Phone II, Location of Propostd Project: A. County Cumberland 1, City, town, community or landmark _ Fayetteville 2. Is propoccrl work within city limits? Ycs XX No C. Creck, river, sound or bay upon which project is loeatrd or nearest nand "1y of water to project Cape Fear River 111. Description of Project A. I. Maintenance of existing project 2, flew wcxl New Relocation of NC 87 0. Purpose of excavation of fill 1. AcQss channel Icnrth width &Vth 2. Boat basin Icnrth width drsiih 3. Fill area See Permits length width dcptIi 4. Other Icnrth width d tl G 1, Bulkhead length _ N/A Average distance waterward of I 2. Type of bulkhead construction (material) N/A D. Excavated material (total for project) 1. Cubic yards __39,195.7 2. Type of material E. Fill material to be placed below W-1W (see also VI. A) 1. Cubit yards _ 6,882.9 7. Typc of material IV, LAM Type. Disposal Area, and Construction EquipmcnC rn t 1I?? a,orelir,e)' N/A Roadway Fill N/A A. Does the area to be excavated include any marshland, swamps or olhc: Yct No B. Does the disposal arcs include any marshland, swamps or other wcllanl: •rci No C. Disposal Area 1, Location N/A 2, Do you claim title to disposal area!- N/A D. Fill material source if fill is to be trucked in E. I low will excavated material be entrapped and erosion controlled? _ By Standard NCDOT ErOSiOn Control Methods r, Typc of cquiprncnt to be used" Roadway Construction Eguipment G. Will marshland be crossed in transporting equipment to prnjeel site? t' explain No V. Inter,dcd Us-A of rm.,1-et /last (Uaerit>t) A. 1. Private N/A 2. Commercial_ N/A 3. Housing Development or Industrial N/A 4. Other_ State Highway For Public Use. 0. 1. Lot size(s) 2. Elevations of lot(s) above mean high water 3. Soil type and texture 4. Type of building facilities or structures _ Roadway and Drainage Structure S. Sewage disposal and/or waste water treatment A. Existing N/A Planned N/A 0. Describe 6. Land Classification (circle one) DEVELOPED TRANSITIONAL CONSERVATION OTHER VI. Pertaining to Fill and Water Quality: COMhtiUNITY RURAL - (See CAMA Local Land Use Plan Synopsis) A. Does the proposed project involve the placement of rill materials below mean high water? YesXXX No 0. 1. Will any runoff or disclarge enter adjacent waters as a result of project activity or planned use of the area following project completion? Yes XX No 2. Type of discharge Rainfall Runoff 3. Location of discharge Into natural drainage channels VII. Present rate of shoreline erosion (if known): N/A VIII. List permit numbers and iswe dates of previous Department of Army Corps of Engineers or State permits for work in project area, if applicable: - N/A IX. Length of time required to complete project: N/A X. In addition to the completed application form, the following iterru must be provided: A. Attach a copy of the deed (with State application only) or other instrument under which applicant claims title to the affected property. OR if applicant is not claiming to be the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under which the owner claims title plus written permission from the owner to carry out the project on his land. 0. Attach an accurate work plat drawn to scale on SY, X 11" white pater (sec instruction booklet for details). Note: Original drawings preferred • only high quality topics accepted. C. A copy of the application and plat must be served upon adjacent riparian landowners by registered or certified mail or by publication (G.S. 113.229 (d))Entcr date served D. List names and complete addresses of the riparian landowners with property adjoining applicant's. Such owners have 30 days in which to submit comments to agencies listed below. See attached property owner sheet XI. Certification requirement: I certify that to the best of my knowledge, tic proposed activity complies with the State of North Carolinas approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a mariner consistent with such program. XII. Any permit issued pursuant to this application will allow only the development described in this appli• cation and plat. Applicants should therefore describe in the application and plat all anticipated devel• oprnent activities, including construction, excavation, filling, and land clearing, D A T E j Ap licant:s Signature i 1 1 1•^1.1.. ? wl. / , 1 ?'? - -- , ? i / • f.M 1 •••• / /Hl.le..•Ilf \GOVI SM••11 - ? `- M f IiM li Inr.fM ! Yl11 ' •MA ?? . Igl•r "fit 1.4 saw." 1l 1 1 1 ?l_ Y.M ?11.r .1 1 Olt- SY..'. I?. /..ff11.11 I1101>t rTIK3 •••Y , k11W[ Uko I CC 1 ..1 •. a, 1 w..0 w C U p M' :3t A N o f„ 1 Il..•f• '•T •• AIM ff / Wfl MI ?• r 1.1.1• Ir V I ?••4M + 1 (PP. J. /•Y/ ••/I I..IA. S O r I N ««.li , E1yt11tr1? I .. T r v- --1{..- M P / .t. / J7W?NM1Al1 'K ?. •1 1 T• S1 1 `I ctllT(o.* .. 0-610 1 I M 0 N W-1,011 1 d1••e- A.wfwit. 9 , Lit r•.?, t Itr?wl , J , Sr•ew.? , 1 r . .. 1 (n•ell Yf1fl •1 !1 N, \I -I/•I.n/ 1 btAh•?1_ -. ' 1 f r-" towif Gi.w 11. * . .? /tippt Mills Cfe. vad. 4N MII 101 J 1 1 r /.IH,mltt• SCOT r•c?Ml` A-1•« p,./1. I - ? raw t?'`04 N,«e1f 1? 1 I l.!^•..1 iMe. l? I .L, N.H 1 I 11•a ten^/1 1 ,•• .1 f 1 •? l•a rl%?»s? Amwew (: «IM? Cie .•,'?'.1 Ir ' - t1 Mw.«• / v? ?• '? 1 !vof MAT r ?>,tN?91 II S!.1 Nt? ` 1 1. . - • r. 1 `• 1 I 11 Ml1 VIII . !, EH ON •. i 111 ,r. •11 i •' „1^? 1 '.' ' «I.N ?IOIAOE GAI ?f10• ' II ` re. N-1 I LANES • 1 • ; 1 IfA I11W Ydllll? ` s? \ 2 I f1 11 , . R " O N ,? 11 I YF SI 1E ; ,If 101 ' '•1• 1 W.10 1 . yn 1 % N.i r•.. Ik?o• 1 • `NODUN 1 r Mr 11 11 1?? \M4d, I.1v VI I ;.••... 1?.1' ' ?' ,l.r Newt 1.1.1 f.r+ ,? .:' t • :F REST llalt snlttla T. Q A 1 pa la" * ?'• . T OfvY.l ' t • ly Y•1 .. ?!I^•! 11 • ` lllr+.l.Mff ` , ••:1 , •`' ? • a 1'• R , i 1• l.lbn ? t. 0 S 10 r0 ' SCAR Of YRIf ON( efCN IOUAIl A/?Ilpf 11 Y?(S c•,n tew "If' p 10 rp Ip ,o ,I SCAM OF AILO.1(T(IS ()it( INCN (OUAIS ANI10[ II ulOetTUS G.if1 I WIT IS IQUAt TO 16" 111104/(TIIS ,,! .. • 1 •111 1.1 ?( r 0 e ly. 1•r qn n» iiil ilv M , \ rcl l? Irn I/M / 111 BE `IN to •?'. Iffl • SITE SCALE 1 0 1 1 1 ! wlll O's SCALE FOR tNLARGtMEN7S .- ,?^ V 1111 ?IW r' iN• 0W f END PROJ. "t •' Lin 1./ 1f711 I1 r r ? 1111 • IIM Ito 1 ? 1111 1111 1 ? 170. . ,f 1 Irl „ 1 1 1 E t'i •?f i? 1 NIC. DEPT( OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUNBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,2M501 U-508CA C D D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SNEIET--(--OF-18 - SEPT. 92 C\l a w I-- i E- • < -? c.., .? ?-- a W ::;G CJ C-3 --{ o r 1 o? S U a -G I E-' ..c7 Ca.. (? I Gc. p O 1 N O - O cL ? cL I E-- ?.... W w O I C3- C/] co A ? => V 1 `--4 U W 0 S-» A ?-s C.l V O m Nwro-ly C:3- r-> cl-I I / 1 I ? I i I co i I I z I 'I I ?Q s z / ? I Od W x ? a C..] ?- v W ;.? U = Cal Z CDK:: :3-- L> a -C I C-_ o a - I Cti O ?c --r 1 ?? J N G'7 • fe-- ?-+ C.3 oo :z:> I a.. C.-A m O MI C.1 A y a c? 1 •-• v w o E-- ---> w 0 0 w --, - ? T z a U c? MA TG<1 L /NE fiIA7(2 ZIVC ? i v I N I I I ? I I ? I I ? a ?. I I I ? ?N CY) oC T- o } W O -'< Y? ?"? :mac.] ^ va ? 1 = E?-? E--. ?c-? Cac. ? 1 1 r._ a o -I ?C N O - d a? - o.. 1 E- - ?-? Ca] W I w . x [ I v 5- = v 1 ?--+ U Cc] D £ -? A •---p Cz7 V Q m C...] - oC z X [1. U c? NlA TC.?1 L /NE' C \ 1 J $ ? O I a a w ? I ra I N 1 H2l dW x _ N a ? ?. Q ?--? -? CU a. E-. V CA I -C ?-? > ^+ T? I ? s V o d I f-. .s> CX.. COI J C+? o a -1 Ott- T N O I? - O fi-- s-..s r., co = I C3- v] m w ?--. Y E-.. O o ?- = v 1 A `--s Cs] C? O m :...3 aC Z T C11 C ?/?) X n.. V vs I 1 $ I u M it 111 It I - 1 ? O I \ W ? i ? A - -7N/ 7 ffJl d? N Z ? t-'-i < c? ?? " °" a_ H o -< } :- C3_ _,. r. F-- c? z t ? s:-- ?c c:1 =:p r . , -? o ?- t o 1 a? s C__) ?. .c-> L.- CC) 1 E-- . [a) OO O 1 cs. v? co p (jaI a ? ? v 1 ?-+ U w ? 5-• c=3 Z.1 cC s X o. V c? &ATCH L /NE - C f ' I O O ? ? I J W A I I Q- ?Nl-7 H.21.VW N O _ d } ?-1 v -3 F- CDC: LLJ C7r 7- ?-- f--- v' ;.JC V ? W CC) I O z -? T 1 C.L. 2 7 N O CL rn m O 1 C-1 ?-• x E? 1 a ?- ? v 1 V O m :i7 - oG S X C" V Cn MATCH LINE F I 1 u I I I O 073- \\ ti 1 1 1 \ \ I N -71Y1 7 fH2-Z VW - 74 ! I I 4 I i ? N,C, DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ® DBNOTES FILL IN WL!-L,XDS; CURBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,240501 U-508CA C 8 D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SCALE P t W SHEET_ 3__OF_18__ SEPT. 92 PLAIN VIEW - W rcN L i/VE - - -- - - 1 ? ? I cn r I T T ? ? I I I D f , ,V V) I g V I R r? I? z J I ' 1111 11 V 1- `% t-(( I H I I 1 W .a P a a d 0. N R7 Q7 W 2 V V N o ? C-> --,3 LL F- A 00 -4 MATCH LINE- A - oc P- ° =,.- W - - O --4 _-.-. ?--A n. -3• F- C/7 z s O E-- I CDC: v o -C I CKa O -? I ?? J N O o cx-o - cy I - E-- .-. C..] oo n., c? m Gc3 r-.. X E I A v I ?-• C-') w 0 5 - Ga ti w (!7 V O m .a] T U o? V c? Ln 0 -" v I w CU ? I O 0- I U- O r n u ?z s J } , to Q Q J z Q Z -i I H w I D- j L C] I r'l a o H rn 9 CT) i I I 0 - U ,? to N 14 O W C) x o C - L c o C l ol ol -9- 3NIl H:)1t1W I lZ I- L J 0 Z Q J F- w w 0 Q ? ? I O ? I a I I 0 IO . w 0 I? -d-3NII H:)iVN M rn I O Q) In LL U Ln v } 0 J LL cD } J Q 0 0001 0 -C C_.) J LC) -- v, s x = s? U) ?- :;;C V W oC Y U a I CC) C1a. Gc. O o x a -.r Z ` 1 1 Z J N Q Q cX-, C-3 cc7 C:L- U I I d- f/] cxn C> A ? = U I O "-s O C= W Z. ?C c?C Cl- U z cn M r4 1-'1 N - O tl_ w ? w w I ti' O U N x 0 0 0 0 CT) OD N x 0 ? F- o; ?- o y W c? :?c S c=1 t --=)I ? E-- CAI ?. Cx. v p o .ca 0 -G [s.. I I - I p 7 N O ?. a ._. c? W m co O I ? ?- U W t=l C- Cj C.1 ?-•? aG [ r i S CL U t/) -9'- 3 N 1-1 HDIVA O O ao 0) W O W U O U H O ? c 0 0 MATCH LINE - C - a_ MATCH LINE - C - CV V) GiC 7G V o I -?C lL L!1 E-+ Oa. p ?C . c s -? W ca.. 1 ?L 1 v =C ? d oC cv - O o... I - fi-+ c-, ?-• C" C!3 Co Ct> 1 o MI . I Dr ca c? ° V I . J C.> ca cxa ti o C= [.3 m ?r? V lL - CL. C3- S V z N o N I Q ? J - O. d O O cc - a } '- o ..J b (V - 0 z J W ? H - ?T 0 o P A k?l p `_fl N w ? ? o w o' 'P o -?- 3N 11 HOiVN •- O O O o 0 0-) 00 r- 1l-- N <D N Lf) N w Pz1 P - a- 3NJI HXVVJ O 000 d' N . M 'N - W w A ?a Ed 0 U ~ ? H vl Co XX; c o c MATCH LINE - E - N -•G C.- t -3 Q U }-; .- , cX ?-- cx CIO o y W . cn z x CJ 1 C-2 -.C ?--? aC s ? o v ?+ o ?.c-s r I -G ? I Cy I Ca. d+ O O Z O -+' "? 1 Z I JC ? N O - • O E-, ?-+ cL c/] aC ct7 m CK31 O 1 O Lc) 1 ca ? ==> V I ..-. • ca c-> CO-1 o c.3 O - O oC m c.1 z X cL V V) 1 eo 8oso-n 80A 1JN83d SON V-l i3M 33S 3NI-I H31VN CD N - I U Z ` LT H V ? z W < U) z I v J kD :-c 3 t n: ' J 00 I- :7j o N - w zz a I Q W N Z R s? J O 0 as v ?] ? O ~ E~ U ' - N N cr Q o Co O -3- 3 N I I F-oiVr4 .- C) O l 0 0 o c G) 00 N Q Ca] H J] ccD .---? a- oC ?- o ?- W vI S x c- rc L7 G.1 cn= S c> d -4 OD I E--- a,-a c.a.. 1 Cr. A o - 1 q- tk. O- r z I ?: J N Q d C O.- I }. d. C/11 an Q 1 O Q w X E-- -1 p A U W C=:3 cr `7 w -t. Q CZ) m V R' Z O X d. V V] cc C\j N_ F a a 1 L) ? U z ? U) ? as t--1 ? 7 O O 0 C o0 IEARTIHI QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.8 AC. FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2925.9_ TOTAL FILL 37 912.7 C.Y. C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNERS NAME Aldolphus Turner Estate 1 2 3 4 W. Greg Sutton Mary Sutton Estate t&DDPJ&% C/O Lillian I. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6288 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 28305 C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305- 5273 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1829 %Seml.l,ndr 1-1 ,., - wn peon/ r 1 ' - i 1 ? !?1 IItCp?gt 1 7 met ' / ILO 15, '.\0 '.Ij, r,rn 1 -- r lonnlonnOr ouu, SDI-MIS Rt ) (A. 1/ N .(n Gurr [albood L v,tl 1 llnA rM. ' S wo well W 1 1. '•`'7I?er?r. ` ` ,• A 'fndrln . • • SN?onlp y 1 , 1 Y 1 it, M.., K11d 1 a l I[tto rely,. <' Manlt ?(u' / /' P.ne1uH1 `? ulketn Penes Splln[ lIRI to / 5 ..mow t.,,t,r tree Iti• Fp; • r AW 11IF • `'[? Y nrr furen 1 Nnnrl lo•Idr - eJlt NV:.l; wl•1 •.. .r••.'I ,nw + ,1 AJ ^'??`yf, "wl v, I, PmraOiLt i 1 f 2yEff®Ml?? all: M P S O N 1 ?dda A'N„N«Rn11 ' 1 " 2m. SITE IIC*,?y` M? .m tt? 0. K E r?a11 :r1 r ""' , 1 .tit. ?( } ,11 1 l1lrmeu,a I M 0 N Il uonuot/ t S9) ' Vtnd« „ A t. r••nr "CIItNORM ??... (??? • . boll so 4r?,r 1 'Crlo"ln t .?1 Sled— 1. 1 IlLell hndrl tlath ? .1 ,n ` IImp111 111.1ad n t Np,t6tF1A, v ?r lr PofrOao' r - } 1 ?I'7 f ?ItOpt Mills Cecil, Crew •f,, v Cetnlr I rl I i ?I 1=? t Aoae,' \ 1 ocllnEl,a 1 t Du onto U / 1 PII?lon` Len. 1 41i +F S C O T L D l unlnr ! 1 t s c; ra 1 r e Hamiti j• MInIn Anlloc HI'dile r' J 1f? / s C' b rut h4u1 n1e T) ?OIJ HunAl tl ,? , ? . IoGe.ma ,J\ ? ;` R.A So""ell i?? , r 1 ~? I.d., 1.,1t• ll:v .. ,n v Ammon rlNr (.11'p 1 1 ' '1 Nrnnrll ' f, I,IenJ `rf I>a11R?1I11 !I Snnl aul ?? ) wltuHl A r ._,e f r,?.?l \ 77 1 , 1 Il/1ne 11 l '1' , wh,lr Olt. ?'DLAI)EN 411 G.Dtg r.nm (ji 17 re ;H, rI ?^ LAKES /r t t I IanN non l1 a S 111 .^Im1 Flu., 7 qs't r boot/(- n. 8 " E O N 11 t J wrote ' P ' 1 AI R u 11 11 Ouohd , Sf AtE. ll,r '. (1 McCW l e ties/ 1 Pr ote ?.. 1 •7-\ tVAdr,IdO r I• Ae. + at • , \ '; A NLm„n 7.1 '\! * Y ?U?t nor rolo,.n1 "+ a oil F EST t. • i. '• Svlllt « y n' , t , `. 1 UOIbdlot }' rU ?I d L A `A7 ?. N io 1r tI Pimr L t 1 , , /• nr? l Rarnn¦ . 1 . r 1 1. X17 ?Ilrn l.N• e 1.0 ` ? 1 rte i , •'' ' I .I •i;. S3?l1J is LI I.Ihw, S1 Pu.1. Nlrl.nn• i 11 , 0 5 10 1t1 1 SCALE Of MILIS ONE INCH IOIIAIS APPR04 IJ MUS (Lofton ell, O IO 70 JO 10 11 SCALE Of KILOMETERS ONI INCH [QUAIS AP?ROR 71 NNOM(IIRS Clr,ut , 1 MIU IS IQUAL to I a01 KILOMETERS • J11 1 ..-..0 ..v.v.. N IT ' v"u..? • c.c P_ :4111) nln / 17' .1 lu.• (j rf I n.. II! lilt ,lee / 1 71 ? ?- i ul ° ? ? 11 1 nrl w, ? 1 r 111 1` n' .nl ?; Ito: ?. Ilw ; ( IN ro . 4 •IOw. 1111 nO ?'I? I w nl. t r,. IN ill 1'1' ,` 71" 7,07 v to _ ' 111 111, IW I .-?•? tow SITES ' J loo. .?? ''tt SCALE y? IMr It , /p ( 0 1 _ 1 1 r Mills rw top BEG. PROJ. I o'11Ir SITES LESS THAN \L SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS ONE ACRE ' l/r1 Lett 1,1, li« 'I I p L N. C. DE111'.OF 'I'I1ANS1>OR"I'A''ION DIVISION OF 111GIiNAYS 1711 .. END PROJ. L CUNI1113RLAND COUN'1'1' ,r, a, r?-'?- ? IDIZOJIiC'f 11?440501, U-508011 ,• II\L7 I 7,it till JIII t 3' E , C It D LOOP IN FAYET'I'LVILLE ` , ? .: e'" •?, I,e ? ..•.?.t I??'' sl-1rI.]• I OI: 15- SEPT. 92 1 C\l N A p w Q) b .? U ?! O O ?D U) Cda a p '7?. ? F.., ? 0 Q > ? o a ?I a a O a LM 0 0 3 i i i i / U H n W IVILY S ROAD --?--? O C? C\i \ N \ a W M V t \J S 0 O O W cr I 1 O? i J Z C? f I ` I 1 1 1 S I I 0? ol 0 0 0", 00 X n w N ? - mot; O p ;n 1. ?' d T ? I O U p "? o ' ? W a; w U) I - E- O F o ! p .a ? F U O 0 .- O Q U Q U p q q ? (, w :s7 LL ?? . V O J lL O l7 Q _ M J _ U O ?4 + - ?'-i O U .•a VJ O U v. O O U Q> N N c? o 0 N o w CY) ..» w w L1J J ? W Q O c n 'r P4 - F" O co ?. .? 0 7 W F 40 O O p U p G W "? LI ti ? U O D 0 Q ? Q Q x ? ? 0 Q z ? cc c I c? I ? I I d Ul) 1 Q 1 Q I Z 1 ? w 1 _ Q Iz $ U ? ? 1 c U aW N z O ? .A. N o X. o w Q) F F" `?: F w kr) r-i !-! o C 7 W o Cl. ? U '? w LO H 0,01 x H Q ? Q J W F o O O U O Q \? U GL U W c!'i 1 LL- N' U E? e; ti ------------------- - --- --- - I I?? 1 I I I \\ \\? I I I I I I I R I ? I\ \ h? v ? n. a v ?. vI? ? W' v ?I a ? a I LI7 I \I \ I ? I o N w 0? 0 4. x U ? .n ? O W ?? T U o -14 c` A o ;1. Lnl r o ?'' 0 a co Lt, i1 ?7 ? ? W l CL -1 ? h--! o O w E-. p O O ? C?'j v O . ? 0. co H . \\ Z U x i 00 I ?I \ \I \ \\\I I •\I \ I I I \I I ? \ \?I I I\ \ U \ I\ I \iu I U • \ \1 \ I ? I z Q.. J z o , I \ `?? I \ \\\?\ I I \ A ', I \ ? I o I a a 1 \ \\• \z\ I I\ \? I a I \? I\F\ ?I\ •? \I ? I \ i\ \I I I ? I ? ? \ 7. C\1 O H a ? --! h--i ! O z ,? LL] a V) 0 Iti 0 \ \ w ~' \? A U O D U p" W i I ? rr A I ? I e! I I i i co Ln \X 00 ul\ i CL ? I IN I I a I x I a II I v I I `. I I? I z \ ` I\ \ > I o a a ,,\I \ ;\ ? 1\ W N i I ? I`???\ \I I ? I o 1 .I \ I,i ? ,_r - I 7 h ? f - E? ? a x 0 o ?. W w ? '?a y ? ? ? U w x A cz. 7. F' o o o w LI cl oo j a Q 4 7 w 0 w Q p I? \\ ?'IN W ? U Q A A W U x a a 0 o a a o w I U I I I 00 .n I I I I ? I ? I a I 0 a I I UI I f nl . I A U A 'r Er F 'r I I I I ?' I 'I I _ 0-) I U Z a ? I I? I I ` ? I I I .n I ? I o nom. 11 ? a I i ? ? I 1 I ? ? I n ? ?\ ? t ? ? I Iv \ DUI y ' ^' ' F a. ?- ?.J I I O C Z U 1 Lli I . O U o ? x c Q LD 7 LT. I O 7 ? w F n. ? U S O. I I G .cry, ? : W .a ti u D ( Q U C z Q ?„ m w U w Q Q I W a I C W ? N I ? I IL U N ? V f ? ? J ? I ? Q - I ti ? yr d 111 ? I r J d ? w ^ Q ( v J 1v '?j N O ? ` 1 O U, z 41 N I O ? O p ' N Q> O o w H f-- I C? ter; ^ o W 0-- Cf) W z :J T CL x p - w I r o ° ts. LS) I U+ CI H O 'r o0 7 u, I °U'? $ a V) w -' n I Q>_U 0 o ca a ? ? U W I U ? W 4 I ? Q ? Q? ?W I Lij LL J I I I I to I ? vi ? e I v t,j c N I I o p o? O Q W Q7 F ? H F b w CL 4 L1J n = o :D w ? ? U o r' -14 O 7.. w F as O E-' O `n U S G ?' W J Cell. Q U a I I / U ? i Q Q? V V 0 y. I L I? ti o ? w J I L ? ? 3 w e J U I V N 1 1 ? O Q Ul N I Q) O O O i ci i N M ° CY) 4- cl: to ? w Fes'. H ? r 0- Q .?. `? W ? r , 1 ? I n V J 0: ? ' O o ? v J lam' ?' Q ?' Ln P4 C: :L c? o w H o E.: p U 0 Q ? u p Q O r) $ - U Q C' W -?- o .-r U z Of I x Ln pp,, CL ? ? ? ? U 0 CL ? rj) U) I ? ? &J - ,, a Lij U) co Fw'' co T o ° 0 0 Q? co -r SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE FILL IN FILL BELOW TOTAL FILL W ETLAN DS(AC.) O.H.W.(CY.) (CY.) 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL I 131 + 00 -L- 404 1.3 0 5,591 140+75 TO NATIONWIDE IA 142 + 00 -L- 26 0.6 0 69 145+00 TO INDIVIDUAL II 155 + 00 -L- 404 2.5 0 1,168 39 + 20 TO 40 + 00 III SERVICE RD 0.03 97 195 33 + 20 TO 35 + 45 IV SERVICE RD 0.23 740 900 27 + 50 TO 29+15 V SERVICE RD 0.28 900 1,400 21 + 00 TO 26+20 V I SERVICE RD 0.57 1,800 2,260 11 + 40 TO 13+00 VII SERVICE RD 0.13 420 800 5.G4 3,957 12,383 A PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS Cumberland Count? Redevel" Fayetteville, NC opment Center Count? of Cumberland H. Lac? Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Road Isuite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 J. A. Holmes Estate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 John Sinclair Perr7 Estate 587-0 Winding Creels Fayetteville, NC 28305 D. L. Perr7 Estate 587-0 Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 Grad? R. Jackson, Jr. 1818 Man17 Fayetteville, NC 28305 PARCEL NO. 1 2 3 4 5 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT July 27, 1992 Ji TC Ii O R A Fi D U ti TO: John Dorney ! I 0 1992 Water Qualit Pl4nning__ _N WETLA%'DS GfiC1l P lh'ATF l!^t y cF,,,...? FROM: M. J. Noland, Reg 51??ioY i13 Fayetteville Regional Office SUBJECT: 401 Certification NC DOT - Central Business District Loop in Fayetteville DEM Project No. 92359 Cumberland County The CBD Loop in Fayetteville is an on-going project which was initiated approximately 12-15 years ago (or more). It is expected to eventually connect Highway 401 north to Highway 87 south, looping around the center of town. This particular segment will begin at Wilkes road south of town and extend southward to the end of an existing highway 87 project. Wetland impacts are near the proposed Wilkes Road intersection. The site was evaluated on July 21, 1992. Most of the usable timber has been removed from the northernmost end (site 1). New growth consist primarily of sweet gum and sweet bay, although a few cinnamon fern were located. Spoil from an existing road ditch separates this area from a drainage system which flows under Wilkes Road into a swampy area adjacent to a County rubble landfill.(The next segment of this project is expected to cross this swampy area.) As indicated on the attached rating sheet, wetland values associated with this segment of the loop project are very low. However, with the proposed alignment, it is likely that future phases could impact more significant wetland areas. The DOT could possibly avoid or minimize these anticipated impacts by shifting the northern end of this project just slightly to the east. Based on the low values associated with this particular segment of the CBD loop project, and the mitigation proposed by debiting the DOT mitigation bank,it is the recommendation of this office that the requested 401 certification be granted. However, prior to issuance of this certification, the DOT should be required to evaluate the wetlands along the corridor of the next northern link and provide an acceptable preliminary plan indicating what measures will be taken to minimize additional impacts. If additional information is required concerning this project, or if this office can be of further assistance, please advise. MJN/KA Enclosure ?a_5L557 WETLAND RATING SYSTEM WORKSHEET, Project No. or description Location County "4 River basin Nearest stre Evaluator Agency and address T 1--> L-7 Nearest road or town and classification - Date and time evaluated Major Wetland Type a?, Approximate size o wetland system,, - acres _ Approximate extent of wetlands in area acres within-/miles Three most common plant species (in order): rcl ?- 6l? Soil Series (if known) Hydrologic indicatorg Direct surface h Disturbance Restora p Restoration value ologic connectiot? YES Is site known to provide habitat for rare, endangered or threatened spei:ies? if so, list species observed or recorded. Item No. Score (circae one) I. Location/Landscape 1 Natural area buffer 5 0 2 Sensitive watershed 5 4 3 0 3 Dispersal corridor system 5 4 3 2 1 II. Ecological Values • 4 Special ecological attributes 5 4 3 _ 1' 5 Wildlife habitat 5. 4 .3 2 .1 6 6 Aquatic life 5 4 3 1:® 7 Water storage 5 4 3 . 0 8 Streambank stabilization 5 4 3 2 9 Removal of pollutants 5 4 3 2 Uf 0 III. Human Values . 10 Outdoor recreation/education 5 4 3 2 11 Economic value 5 4 3 0 Total score Site description and notes: Existing Conditi,-. ins ?I? Drainage •?ion otent r Fayetteville CBD Loop Cumberland County TIP# U-508CB, State Project# 8.2440501 NCDOT contact: Gordon Cashin 6/26/92 Application submitted for 404 Individual Permit and 401 Water Quality Certification. The Project impacts 3.1 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat. NCDOT proposed appropriate debits from the Company Swamp Mitigation Bank as mitigation. 7/13/92 No response from the regulatory agencies has been received. 9 r I f G r WIV,?V, m - s r?T? l /AO 11 I r .. 1 fla SW.-Is •IO 1 t. mes ,,/olMSOnwut DWI S9W4S a) 1 T 4-t O.we ..M(.?ef Vasa I ?- / _ 1 roo Eastwood _ ?1• \ LIMA _ ), west End I 1 .. ` ..,? - \ _ /Y;..• ' Godwin . Sul awl t 1 7- tau f Adams, ?Adams, A +T / waoe I at ,'ab nnenM?s?t ; uLhwn iln[LA1R'• IG j C U ivy £ R.. A N _ bean I Atene. .•? AOnOem • 6 P•••.r '.ol /mlgt kle/ tw?;+. ,,.,.1 V•. II •...'. IrY, + 7 1f?a. P--cowl r' Cu: M P 5 O N 71?Aef?HwRN1a *: } 1 m•. SAT 41 0 K E E rw,. •5.?•;._,,,,:? . ).lem•V9 : ._..c(rrt+toJI.1F 1^ , \ ?-?t ?` M •,r - M 0 N (, t Mmi, oil ? IvIM4fI +1.llr-+tt • 1Nt11y.rF aw , C,tr.Ofllf ?,-¢ Slmm,n , 1 1 Oe•aN .• MM Sian, , !rte fi,n0t11fn0 n Roclns; - 1 Co(nat I,li j ' a• 'rk Aippe MIAs r Cedu CIt-• ,/,?• 7 ;; OCltnth7 t .? . ,? PamonT Etna 1 '•.tx 7I \ ? •• Mlatn . ' '' III / 1u.1.•et ' 71 r pl' LI 1 dlH?mlEl j' SCOT 0 •H Anl?« 'N, - Rea \ C?u7 a,•t rat. h01Y 'J i"e -`Old H./.dlf l? 1 I? T0?y1TO .. a _ Rtd Sq1? 'ter \ !? ? E„1, l.,?l,r lln ...w.- Ammo" f. a.land tl. .0 l I r, NO( \ Alm 't 71 wa.wla ? ` 53 I 10 f sl v •91Al)EN L °1 a Hanru• ' 19 I Iwlnli 1 . YRwtt Oat e,OS f110, I ref Heto . \ ..1 o• 17 , s?,n LAKES ; t tam,nsw? ason 0 N ,`I 1 ?r wmlf 'fit `f:cl ` In fj B„ E nl 1 u ouolm?, SLATE it Ikeo1 a• Nash 1 Pt Io,e '61. L, ?.. , \WerItl;Id?Jhrr ."IS ? ?? ? ?' t Eblaaelnlo.n ,t, ••• T •FOREST ?)rule „ na0t7tW+' 1 g A a7 Q, N T • -` r' Flak li.wr =yam... :toy 1 s.e Iaoenoan L . AI 57 a../...1" :EE 0 S 10 SCALE Of MILES ONE INCH EC,UAES A?PROA 13 MMES Clert' to11 uHr 1 0 1p lp ?0 O Ad SCALE OF AILOME TEAS ONE 1MCH EOVALS APPROA 21 AILOMETEAS r Ca,rels 1 MILE IS EQUAL TO 1 609 AILOMETCtS ' 1 , II e VnM• 'Ital nin tl' , l , i, IS V 4 nv ,:- n/. o- „? nU list a \` LIE LIEF W! sa IM, W s' a f n9. I! w ? >a )111 Ell- 1EE ;I'Vtob Iv.? ^ 7107 BEG. FROJ. ull Its- • N END PROJ . I \ uti l1.V SITES SCALE t 0 I 7 ] V MILES ? :o•+iD? e` a t I WlA / ` '-• t SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS tu• ..s ? E N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 1P• •? t -tL DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS t CUMBERLAND COUNTY t 1af9 !u '• t PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB _ t C C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE ?`' E SHEET I of 15 JUNE 92 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Action ID 199202767 July 30, 1992 PUBLIC NOTICE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS (NCDOT), Post office Box 25201, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201, has applied for a Department of the Army (DA) permit TO PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN WETLANDS ADJACENT THE CAPE FEAR RIVER IN FAYETTEVILLE, Cumberland County, North Carolina. The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant. Plans submitted with the application show construction of a new segment of the Central Business District Loop (CBD) in Fayetteville. The work will involve construction of 2.54 miles of roadway consisting of a four lane divided highway with full control of access except at intersecting highways from existing NC Highway 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) (Projects U- 0508CA and U-0508CB). An estimated 45,036 cubic yards of fill material discharged at four locations will impact approximately 11.3 acres of bottomland hardwood wetlands, including one 8.2 acre area . NCDOT proposes to compensate for lost wetlands on a 2:1 acreage basis, pending location of a suitable site. The purpose of the work is to adequately serve the future transportation needs of traffic in the vicinity of the Fayetteville central business district. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice. The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No DA permit will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management has determined the applicability of a Water Quality Certificate as required by PL 92-500. This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. awl -2- The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion therein, and this worksite is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit. The District Engineer, based on available information, is not aware that the proposed activity will affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the public interest. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess -3- impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Generally, the decision whether to issue this DA permit will not be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) issues, denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The DEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302, 306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the DA permit serves as application to the DEM for certification. Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs. The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management plans to take final action in the issuance of the Clean Water Act certification on or after August 21, 1992. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Post Office Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687, on or before August 17, 1992, Attention: Mr. John Dorney. Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in this office, Attention: Mr. Scott McLendon, until 4:15 p.m., August 31, 1992, or telephone (919) 251-4725 7., Strr 1v... r..11 1,.? . `' 1 M..••? _ /M;. ? , Gww• S / ?' .? S In ?•I 1i=' !" ? YID TI Iyii11/ ! ?;,`i?f \f7 ^ f 1 ? w?.t I/ ? ? /. v1 ??11 ? t tllpfTl ?utf •»w Soria (LIt I t ? ' r Mr 1 tu.l r.. .. + n 1 ?. I P ?? M P S O N ?` %of NCO r K E IU* -,y ® 1 S? t - .,..,... - 'cll* r? M O N LJ.X , Y..n/1?16?1. - M.w /r F r.JM 1 ' r YV 11 , middle, '1?a Mills c~ Caw yM+.N'. 1 2 r Gjer I;O1l 1= ? WM,I? ?. . r•T SCOT AM— ?r J let N Ilh .. .e.b A.,wl..l erIV.1 'dw r.pl \weN.lt ' 11 11 wrlwlr ' ` \ wp.aQM LADEN'..? 4111 A I 1 ..tee ' I2 rMN..I LAKES t• • ..1 r Inw.llti O N tl 1 I ' \ St T E nl,l. , Edi 1 M[cN r N111 t? 1 1 ! r rr SI t 11 r,? \ I? 7? 1 b ?* i f REST ? t "' ? - ` (vMa 51?1 . ; c \ ,I ¦.... r?1 to* e q p N frllk tlrtfi.?r '?^ . ?, r ~ t• ` 1 r•ll Ij. • 1 I Ied I.IM , •Ilo.r 0 S I1 SM( Ot 111E 11 ON( MCN EQUALS A1?110[ ISI?l I3 Cl.w to M11, SCALE Of N,0•r(TIRS Olrl VoCK EQUALI AIrAOI 11 nA p.[Turs G....1 p Ip )9 )0 10 It t rlll IS (QUA( TO I W IIILOY(T(R$ • 1 I 14 t _ r1 ! •IIITr. e 11 1.t. 1111 Y Q 11.1 UV 1• I tr ? 111 END PROJ. u.7 , ?• IIu M \ It lAr• Ir.. / BEG. PROJ. 111• 111' 11« Eft 5,.. F llf: 1N •?. - - 1 \ . SITE SCALE 1 p 1 7 1 0 _ !- 1 wU / SCALE KX 1?AAkG MtN7S 1 EI NEC. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS •' CMERLAND COUNTY "" j1 r PROJECT 8,2440301 U-508CA C 8 D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET 1 OF 6 12 - c z MA TG?1 L /NE A x _ CO ? ? J N cr, s ? ? H am C---l -.< - - s O U -- • o ?- t I "? J N O - c- - O ?--. w oo d- t 1 o.. w va .---• m x H p w N I I a ?- = U 1 c? o m L.3 ?C S =I- V] 11 H V] 8 J 1 I I l.? l 1 N I I I I I I `R F Z a 'I. 0 V) Z Z E- coG =r v a t I ? fr .ca [?.. I C^. p a - 1 T J N Q cl- i-. .- . W oo p I C3- C17 m o M I A ? ? v I ?-a U W 9 E • Ca '-? W cza Z-3 oiG Z X Q+ U cl-I as D z a I, W MA TefAl L /NF B l ? o . `J rLT _ -C U rn ? I F? H cry m •--• N va z z c? z = ? E-- w 04 S U O I Lam. r. _ O ca =C v -..- - 1 S 1 ir-- O .--. J c? w N - ao O a+ I J I ca- C013 am - •--.. ca v w ti 0 E- w U p m :i3 oc z ?G a.. V tl] MA TCH L /NE - D { ?• tel. \ \??\ \ 1 I _ O ? I Q o ? - - r - 3N1-7 N.7ldW 0 oC ?-. o y N Cl- 3 i -- E--- cn T z E-- ?. v ? W fr+ .rte c.?. ?7 Ga. a a I 0... O ? -r Z 1 ? J N O c--- w CD = I Cl-. f/7 = O C-1 E-- J I A ?- = U 1 ' ?-a U W D E- Ca '-7 GJ U O m - ? T x n.. U cr, MATCH LINE E I\ I ? I \ I olz \ CU )< C\j I - 0 -7/Y/ 7 H2Z VW - PLAN VlEW - MN rcH ? i?vE F I ?• END 1 ?- CONS T. 8 S T4. I 129+g 1 - _ I l I I?' I KI -' N.C. DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION WET/ANDS Z- IMI r DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DEMOTES FAL IN WETLANDS CUNBERLAND COUNTY PROJECT 8,2110501 U-508CA C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SCALE 10 - 60' S HE E?--7--O F_ _ 12 - 91 < cm:b --4 ? ° ' cV O t r ...-a --J Cl- 7i fr- f--+ cx s z > fr- ?c C.=it CAI ce- s v o I Cm. a o - 1 J cy. O ? 1 Z J N Q • O d - o- G-- •.-• w o0 o I Cl- va 00 p 0c) 1 C.3 .? C__) CA-) Ca F-- - A -? w U o CiCM _-t I \ l i V, \ \\ 1 If I I I I ..\I I ?? v v I 1`1 ???? ' I 1 1 `? VVV R F N I 1. PO A O Q - y- ?N 11 H DiVN Oct - - z U > =31 E- w o o? I -C f •--. x v .-• .?ca a- I c? j ° l9 l7 c]a. O Cm- O ca -C o -ir ?. - I I ?- , s. ° - r- _ ? m °° I .. n o? 6-4 Ca ti CZj H W C> %G O oC CL = U V] LL U - I Ln - V W ° I Q 3 U) I ° 1 L.L - F- ° I CC > Q 2 J I a I r , O - - Z - a I w I I ? O U O x I o o O QI O o 0 m 001 r?- o _ Q ? m - y- ?N11 N:)iVVJ C) -t F '- U oo o J ? N o?o I ? s v o -?? I t9 l? E-+ O -C a c7 - . Cz, C 1 ?-• s. _ Cwt o0 0 1 D } ?--? ? U U W c? E--1 U A "-a p ? W m ?:3 z L LL U - W I 0 Q 3 ? ? o J H ? U I ? U ? Q ? I a J I r J M Z Q I J W I I f? I H I I ? O U x ? ° o O O O Q o C co 0 MATCH LINE - 0 - I I ?I I I? IZ 1 I W I ? I Q c lD H a 0 I J ? a 0 Z Q I F- I w 3 I ? I I O ?o O LL U v 0 J LL 00 _J Q O E-- crs ao .--. ? a? a- o ?- ao E- c? s z H Z U =1 r.i cC ?C U o -? r n I Cs. v? 1 fc -.-> C:. o k - 1 Ca. O -?- i rx- Z ? N O O rX Gi, ( fi-- ?-+ W ao O 0- Coll ca O o I 1 C-3 • • ?c E-? - I 4 > = v I - ca ?-? w v a m :.? w 0 pl? Qo _ _ II L.n -V- 3NI-3 HDIVA - O O O m co W W O U H c? PX O CD c 0 0 Q) MATCH LINE - C - w 0 Q Q- 0 IY a 0 z Q J H W F- J y U x o _ E 0o --4 c.l s ==I E-. - z v = C•, ? ? S U o ? I W ll. E - ., a Cy , U Oc. O 2 ?.- ? I Ln O --< -r ?-+ s.. a N CZ> v - ° rxt _ ca- - ?. . ? C" ° r-a 3 0 » ? I U o O i ? w l7 lL - ? s z ? CV a r J Q 0 cV - 0 0 I O CV - w 0 w I I ro ?q ? U 0 ? 0? C4 I y q I z A ? N Qi - 9- 3N I? H 31bW - O O O o 0 0) cn I? 0 ?--? E, Q C-3 - -? MA TCH LINE d E-+ ? T v o ? I `--.? } N N - cL 3 c--- ? E- ? ? v o d I to li Cx. c=.. a a z o ..- .1 z 1 U U) J N :C- Q m o I ? o y? v 1 3 - v ca ti £-- w o m :? J LL- Cl- U C/7 w - C Q LD CV cc > - Q a }' o Q a ? C) - IIkk Y? LC) 3 Cv - 0 o z a o \ ~ - ?-a LLJ :I- O `D { ? O A z 3 14 ? O U a cZ ! O ? o M A ? o N - - C - 3Nll HXVIN - 0 O 00 o c Q> 0 Ems-. cr, V ? ? cx:Z - o. ?mz c- E C013 s -_a_- C--2 =D Cs1 o? s c> o E-+ C.s. ca .cam o [:.. I - I C]c.. o O 2 d Y -.- s 6--. I :z. `.? J O N CS. O or _ C/7 C=3 0o O I C+1 A N-4 x > > E-+ U .-3 -1 1 ' 0- ? U Cb C? a c7 E--» W V O ? m -.i s 9o soso- n 2i 03 IJN83d SO N V-113M 33S 3N1-I HDIVN cV - ? I 0 ' U - W ' Q ? U I 0 a o 00 - W o cV ? a I Q ? U ? Q ?a w `? -' x O U o F" U Q 'N - -0- 3NI? fDiVrq - O O M o 0 co EARTH u QUANTITIES TOTAL: FILL IN WETLANDS 8.2 AC. FILL BELOW O.H.W. 2925.9 C.Y. TOTAL FILL 35327.7 C.Y. PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS PARCEL NO. OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS 1 Aldolphus Turner Estate C/O Lillian I. Turner 720 Old Wilmington Rd. Fayetteville, NC 28301- 6288 2 W. Greg Sutton 405 Vista Drive Fayetteville, NC 28305 3 Mary Sutton Estate C/O A. Sher 312 Devane Street Fayetteville, NC 28305- 5273 4 Cumberland County Redevel- Post Office Box 1829 opment Center Fayetteville, NC 28302- 1829 rrnrrl rn ?.--TTrr?-,?11 wn ,? I ru Sa'^n p°ul Say^wt to I ' T . loom nn..u. I - - ?1. 0: 1 1 ? 5 . i ll?«, ? L, tlrood >, \ ? wr,l End , i?rA r.'r. r Godrln )'r Sul ml 1 L • IN - I.It i<• ,LT nrr 1 ` / M.ntl?l 62 r J ? F ulAefn hnes SCnL U?Mi 10 A N i'v +' Prntl *I 21 I?? rr S .?w.M w,•<A tN< . Yr^r,?twn 1 .nr' .WI •n 4/t •; All,, Te . 1011 N'-.,. •. . P 5 w O N ?` lo•f'r .ntblull l . f ay ettlrill 7 (fU: yr 1. - ' SITE I1 ? k11 ji O K E Al rki Cllrttolh 6 M O N ?((,, In MonUO>< 7 S ?IV W« NoIIrA,n ? 4.A,IaL ?C a/nDerl,n , ,J I Sledmrn , 1 t IIIW 11• .- I ?. Irmb«I,nd Cy Rmk I! $I C M r1 t1 rd ,l + /,vtope Mills C--' toOil j,'O A,,b,CAlrtthd t '•/ ` (, «ntn `/ P,1 Mloni 1 l•n• Fli , D u^b< s, r RLHamlel* SCOT M c' A„I,«? urrdi< , _ _ _ C"„Tr,y r.,/ nbw ) r„wo Rtl C 43 1 _ r. ? y Mrr. /I„tn ` U? J? t1 Id It T,dlt r° Sn, nnUn IpD«ma+l-'? Iw ? l..•1• L/ 11?r all. nd ri•,r ti 1A•`" ? I• O Nrd :M?nY, I f \ I.r l,- ll.v. .r v 1Amrnw• (i < 4r^n m 1 / rr 53 tu'tl•N illI?EI?I(EEt i1r.,1r11.A ? ' ? ,1, \` I, l 11 r. ' 19 VA I, O.. 13L ADEN 1 rwmd 1 ( ??,,,,,/ GrD>tya?Sr C?, ram 1? 71 f,r\rt<? _ '? LAKES / `Y 1 lom. ta. 'ldr<on ' •I,t .Films Rur• 1 1 , 1?, Y 1 0? ,Door/ O N 7 wn,lr i R , B E I, 9f TE L,6 A<.r ' w1 ? ? , , 71 I Dubl,r/?` 1 F t 11; v !,r r ?„ r II NI ' P oAr + I Ilia \ IPANf` I., 1• ."F * lee \ ; \r, , \ ,' A] ;..^,., I;'`II is Y Flrl.n.lmo..n,f ^'- F 'FOREST ?. Ild) um tI DA* • 1 B A e7 0- Sallt ti; ) I 1.? Rru:m, ?- ?j =1!'.. , T v N root bl,d<nDurn 1 1 I?fbon 51 p-l.^n' l ?. 0 5 10 __ 20 SCALE Of MILES ONE INCH EWAIS APPROA 13 MILES ``C?t«.Inn At11T SCALE 01 RILOME ILAS ONE INCN (OVALS APPRO> tl KR OMI TEAS Cr'•dt 0 10 70 10 10 61 1 MILE IS IQUAt f0 1601 AILOM(TEAS 11 0 • '110 1I (tJ IJ' `011 1 h I <\ '.. n 111 L71r 1,•e l ;? _° it I ,• \ `' ,11 1',N lip w T I? +11 U!) 7111 H, ?, n,. IW I _ '.r SITES SCALE ?1 A M BEG. PROJ. ` ` MAE i , SCALE FOR ENLARGEMENTS EI u1, I 11.• 1. "" II N. C. DEPT. OF "r 11ANS110 R'rAT10N DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 11.1 " 11a END PROD. 'tt Cl?MI3I;RLAND COITNTY r o, t Ur, t? 1 PROJECT 8.2440501. U-508[1} C B D LOOP IN f Al'ETTEVILLF s n ? ti a. I IH, y > sHl:crr _I OF I JUNE 92 ?. 2 W Q H W A H W e z ..a C? A x I a 0 _ x 0 o W u-, U W f^ z .n W U o ?- o 00 z -' CL o a Ln ti 8 M W ? U O a Q U U W z x C x U H ?vl 21 WILKF,S ROAD ?/? \ \\L;J \ ?I, ? 111 ?\\ 3 % O ti W b .n u W o w C\j (3) x w Lli :D O z ?? U o x w O z ao z p O m U a O I w ., U O A Q U A ?" ? W If? ? U V 0 t 1 J C? l1- U ? Q M J 1 J V 1 Q ? Lli I ? CD I - LLJ W U) \? + O U N ? _ x I O O o 00 r ° o o_ w ? W z??" W z a x ? ? W 0 x o E- O o0 7. W P4 Q w Q, O O m ti U a A O v a u° w 3 U W O Q 7 x + 0 u? cl: I ? a I Z ? LiJ .a Q Ew S C9. a I ?- I ?014 I Z R ? O U H W U z o o o co r 1 a x c., F Q a W r-? r-? w N a r, r I I I I I I u? I 00 I z z x I a a o I x I a I I I I I ? I Ln I I ? i. N o w CY) .a W ? w r, J- iJ,. Q _. W I I L n X U W x I I I I I I _ I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I? Q I I I U I I A I ? I ?, I z I x I w I H I ? I ? I I ? I a I I I I I o I I ? of a I I I I I I I I I I I I kL i I I _ ? o N o w G W z r W O - n v ,.; , ? LCD w v, O /, E a '? e U o p J W U W x -n cn 0 I 1 I I ?_ co I I I--- I U R . - I I I I I I ?? ?. I I I I ? I ? I I I I I 1 ? j i I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I i I ?r l I O ? I I I I ? I I I ? I o I I I I Ln I I ?. I I I I `-' 'I I Rte. I r? o I I ? I I z ? z I I - ? I ? I l a o o x I I I I I q ', \I x I a a I Q I ? I a °? I - I? I w I a n, I I H I ? I a I I w ? I a ? o a I I I ? I I I I I I I ? I I I I I I I I I( u ra I I I I I - - r/ H ?a Chi 6 x U F? U v r ? I 0 I ° 1 U I I I I I I I 00 I I o a I a ? a x I a I o I x I I I I I = U! 0 O f ?) l-n I I F w w E~ 0 w Q i N n ? O W c ?? U Q • o '? co v Q/ W ? a O J w I --- -?' it ? '41 16' I I I I I _ I I I ?? I I I I ?, I I I I 'I I I I \?? I I I I I II I I I I ? I Q\l I I I II ?.' I I I 'I I I II x I I I w ?I I z I a a I h ? I ? I I x ?' I I a ?? % a I ? I I I : ?, I I - t o a I .I I ? I II I I w ', I ? I I C II 1 I ?I I I I I ? ? i , , Q i N r "? F ?• w F r ,? x Ca a Ln r w 6i Ci. ! ci o -r E- G co 7 1 U? Q Q U O ti Q~'? Q o ' v Q a `? w U W x a x a 0 Q x .? a w .? I I I ? ? = I + I I I W I I I I ? I? ? I I I I - I ? ul I 00 I 'I = 101) I I ? - I z iL I I ? I v a I ??' I I a I I r? 1 I a I I ?Ij, ? ? I - O I I - M \ I- I .3 ' ? I I 1, I Iu o .ul ul + I I l g I 1 ?Y Ln i- I a x .? U ? F r., w -- ----- --- ------------ ------- 0, F r o W z i W ? ___l a W z A ? I 00 z _ w O O -' U S o a ~ ? ti a OI Q ?_ A U O A '? W U 0. U ? Q D v ? N I I U? U in v I ? ? Q w J J ? Q I I o I Q ? I I J ?t- Qr,? ?w I z J y? ?U J LA- 0 Cf- O w N ? H ?, O c a W '. LL. W z O Q U 2 o a ? Q w ? U w 00 U O a z ag A ? U O w ? l-kj 1? Q V? Q V_ N QZ Ul N Q `Q C-t V V j 0 ? z J 3 I I l I i W 0 o w N 0? H 4 ? ? x O F ? a °° ? U .? 8 W 0 z " x J Q e v N . ?, If N -o o O + Q o 0 Ld I - 8 0 [ O a Q v z ) O O ? A Z e ? U ? ao U ? a > w `l CL p A co N m Z 0 w Ln CI- pp?, a U) LLJ d C12 m Z 04 4 ? 0 ? W a W z o 0 0 SUMMARY REPORT SITE STATION PERMIT TYPE DILL IN FILL IlELOW TOTAL FILL WETLANDS(AC J O.H.W.(CY.) (CYJ 129+45 TO INDIVIDUAL 5591 I 131+ 00 -L- 404 1.3 0 141+12 TO NATIONWIDE: IA 141+ 52 -1,- 14 0.2 0 23 1.45+00 TO INDIVIDUAL 1168 if 155 + 00 -I,- 404 1.6 (1 3.1 0 6782 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBER LAND COUNTY PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET _? = . OF -D_ JUNE 92 PROPERTY OWNER NAME AND ADDRESS OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NO 1 2 3 4 5 CutnberlanJ County Redevel- Fayetteville, NC opment Center County of Curn6erlanJ H. Lacy Godwin Estate 2521 Raeford Ro&J Suite C Fayetteville, NC 28305 J. A. Horne. Eitate 1010 Hay Street Fayetteville, NC 28301 Jolin Sinclair Perry Estate 587-C Winding Creek Fayetteville, NC 28305 D. L. Perry E.(.te 587-C Winding Crork F.yetteville, NC 28305 Grady R. Jackson, Jr. 1818 M.nly Fayetteville, NC 28305 N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS CUMBERLAND COUNT' PROJECT 8.2440501, U-508CB C B D LOOP IN FAYETTEVILLE SHEET 15 of 15 JUNE -92 r FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Bottomland Hardwood Wetlands Mitigation Proposal The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) will insure that the mitigation site will exceed the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). NCDOT will document, using monitoring wells or visual observation, that this hydrology parameter has been met. Locations and numbers of monitoring wells, if utilized, will be established through coordination with Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel. Installation of any wells will take place prior to planting. After grading of the site is completed, wetland tree species such as river birch (Betula ni ra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii), water oak (Quercus ni ra) and black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) will be planted on 8 foot centers to compensate for forested wetlands removed along the segment. Species compositions will be approximately equal. If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. NCDOT will be required to seed the mitigation area with grass immediately after grading to satisfy soil erosion regulations. Fertilizer and lime will be added to the area at this time. NCDOT will reapply these additives if it is deemed necessary prior to planting of the seedlings. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location o these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. 1 NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper elevation and grade, get permitting agency approval on the elevation 2. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality *river birch (Betula nigra) *green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) *overcup oak (Quercus lyrata) *swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii) *water oak (Quercus nigra) *black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) * If less than six species are available at the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with Corps personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. 3. Coordinate hydrologic sampling with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers** ** Hydrological sampling will take place periodically throughout the growing seasons until adequate hydrological conditions are met B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition r 4. Present to Corps of Engineers an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre 2. Take photographs Note: Information from monitoring will be submitted to the Corps of Engineers. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event - no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility B. 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12% of the growing season) - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility e.w SiAT[ TLn,;_; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WATER 011,[_IiY JAMES B. HUNT. IR. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 July 14, 1993 District Engineer Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch Post Office Box 1890 Wilmington, NC 28402-1890 Dear Sir: SUBJECT: Cumberland County, Fayetteville Central Business Loop, TIP No. U-0508 CA and U-0508 CB, State Project No. 8.2440501. The North Carolina Department of Transportation has prepared a miti,,ation proposal to offset the unavoidable SAm HUNT SECRETARY C' impacts of the proposed project. As you are aware, a great deal of coordination has already taken place during the development of this proposal. A conceptual mitigation plan was distributed to appropriate regulatory and regulatory review agencies on November 16, 1992. Comments were received during January and February of 1993. The NCDOT then conducted additional investigations of the proposed mitigation site. Attached you will find a copy of the revised mitigation plan. This proposal reflects the comments received from the agencies. Please review this proposal, and provide any additional comments to us. If you need any additional information, please contact Mr. Gordon Cashin (919) 733-9770. Sincerely, J - aZ inn, PE Assistant Manager Planning and Environmental Branch 2 1993 l . 1 . cc: John Dorney, DEM David Yow, NCWRC W. F. Rosser, PE Division 6 Engineer Kelly Barger, PE, Project Management Don Morton, PE, Design Services A.L. Hankins, PE, Hydraulics Unit FAYETTEVILLE CBD LOOP From NC 87 to SR 2283 (East Mountain Drive) Cumberland County U-0508 CA and CB Wetlands Mitigation Proposal 7/13/93 The 1990 Memorandum of Agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency specifies procedures to determine the type and level of mitigation necessary to comply with the Clean Water Act 404(b)(1) Guidelines. In accordance with this MOA, NCDOT is committed to mitigating for the unavoidable wetland impacts associated with the proposed CBD Loop project. A search was conducted for a suitable site for wetland restoration, enhancement or creation. This search took place first in the project area, and was later expanded within the Cape Fear River basin. A potential mitigation site was identified in Sampson County on the South River. A conceptual mitigation plan was prepared for this property, and distributed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of Environmental Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Comments were received from these agencies in January and February 1993, and this revised mitigation proposal reflects those comments. SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed mitigation site is located in Sampson County on the South River, a tributary of the Cape Fear River. This site is accessible by road from SR 1208, and has about 1/2 mile of frontage on the South River. It contains about 429.5 acres of field, undisturbed bottomlands, and logged areas. There are about 79.5 acres of farm fields under cultivation. These fields contain areas of hydric and nonhydric soil. About 150 acres of forest were cut over before 1987 and are regenerating naturally. It is not clear how much of this logged area is wetland. There are about 50 acres of undisturbed bottomlands along the river which are mostly wetlands. About 150 acres are currently being logged, and much of this area is wetland (See attached topographic map and aerial photograph). t This site has been visited by representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the N.C. Division of Environmental ?Management, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U.S. National :'Marine Fisheries Service. The general consensus of the agencies is that the site has a great deal of potential for wetland restoration and enhancement. It is possible that ownership of the tract could ultimately be transferred to the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, and this possibility is being discussed. Use of this property for mitigation will involve a combination approach of restoration, enhancement and preservation. It may also be possible to create fish spawning areas adjacent to existing lowlands. Primary emphasis will be given to those areas where wetland conditions- have been entirely removed. This will especially apply to the farm fields containing hydric soil, where hydrologic restoration and reforestation should restore the original wetland conditions on the site. Secondary consideration will be given to enhancement of existing wetlands which have been deforested or have had the natural hydrology modified. Acquiring the property will also preserve high quality wetland habitat along the river. HYDROLOGY The first and most important component of the mitigation plan will be to restore natural hydrology. NCDOT will conduct a complete investigation of existing drainage patterns on the property, and develop a plan to reverse the man-made modifications on the site. The goal is to reestablish the 1987 Delineation Manual criteria for wetland hydrology on the areas of hydric soil present on the property (i.e. saturation to within 12 inches of the surface, ponded or flooded for at least 26 consecutive days of the growing season). This goal will ensure that the wetlands on the mitigation site are comparable to those impacted by the CBD project, which were assessed under 1987 Manual criteria. At the present time, the property is drained by a series of ditches. These ditches occur both in the farm fields and the cutover areas. In some places of hydric soil, the ditches have apparently lowered the water table sufficiently to remove wetland hydrology. In other areas, hydrologic modification has not removed wetland status. For example, the recent logging activity has had detrimental impacts on the natural hydrology of the cutover area, but this area is still a jurisdictional wetland. i The details of the hydrologic r-estoration have not been completed. The ditches will be p"?gge either with fill or structures in order to raise the w• r table. The placement and design of these modifications is currently being studied. This study will also determine the location and number of monitoring wells. Once the project is implemented observation wells will be monitored one time per week during the growing season until the essential hydrology parameter has been demonstrated. The wells will be monitored once a month outside the growing season. VEGETATION The property contains areas where the vegetation is relatively undisturbed and other areas that have been extensively disturbed by farming and logging. The ditches through the agricultural fields have been colonized by canopy species such as sweetbay, red maple, sweetgum, river birch and tulip polar. The cutovers are in early stages of regeneration by early colonizers such as sweetgum and red maple. The cutovers also contain scattered cypress trees left by the loggers. Various shrubs are also to be seen, such as wax myrtle, gallberry, and redbay. There are also several residual stands of undisturbed bottomland. The canopy in these areas consists of such species as tulip poplar, black gum, loblolly pine, sweet bay, sweetgum, red maple, and willow oak. Several of these areas are still expected to be logged under a pre-existing timber deed. At one site, there is a wetland community with a scattered canopy containing atlantic white cedar and black gum stand. The understory of this stand includes an abundance of young white cedars. It is not certain whether this site is included in the timber deed. There is a fringe swamp forest along the banks of the South River. This stand consists primarily of mature cypress trees. The NCDOT proposes to reforest the cleared hydric soil areas of the property with the following climax forest species: Overcup oak (Quercus lyrata) Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus Michauxii) Water oak (Quercus nigra) Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica) Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) These trees will be planted on 8 foot centers, with species compositions approximately equal. Seedlings of 12 to 24 inches will be used. If undesirable or nuisance species appear to be threatening the success of the planted species, NCDOT will implement corrective measures to remedy the situation. It may be possible to extend this reforestation over some of the logged areas if a suitable planting methodology can be found. NCDOT proposes a success criteria of at least 320 trees per acre surviving for at least three years. If at any point during the monitoring process, the number of stems per acre drops below 320, NCDOT will consult with COE personnel to determine appropriate corrective actions. In order to determine the number of stems per acre, NCDOT proposes to utilize permanent sample plots which adequately represent the site. No more than one 0.05 acre plot per acre will be utilized. The number and location of these sites will be determined through consultation with COE personnel after initial planning. MONITORING NCDOT has developed a monitoring plan to insure the success of this proposed mitigation effort. The guidelines for this effort are as follows: I. Monitoring Timeframe Mitigation sites will be inspected at the following times. A. Prior to planting B. At completion of planting C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. II. Data to be Obtained at Specific Inspection Times A. Prior to planting 1. Check for proper plant species and for acceptable plant quality 2. Hydrology monitoring wells will be monitred one time per week, at a minimum, until the essentia\ hydrology parameter has been demonstrated.. _. J B. At completion of planting 1. Check for proper planting methods 2. Check for proper plant spacing (8' O.C.) 3. Check for proper species composition 4. Present to Corps of Engineers/an "as built" plan drawing of the area, including final elevations, species compositions including numbers, well locations (if applicable), and sample plot locations. C. During August-September of each growing season until success criteria (>320 trees/acre living for at least 3 years) has been met. 1. Determine number of stems per acre ?5 ?L?f 2 Take photographs `rte ? r s ?UiS J? elf U? 1,??? Note: Written, post-construction monitoring repo t??.,, h r ?,? will be provided to the Corps of Engineers no later than October 31 of each monitoring year r?d ?NG??,,r) from the time that wetland hydrology has been (??? ?,,•???, ?,??l F?? established and documented. III. Evaluation and Recourse Action A. 1. Acceptable survival rate of a minimum of 320 stems per acre at each post planting monitoring event -no action 2. Below acceptable survival rate at any monitoring event (recourse options) a. Replant (supplemental or complete) b. Minor regrading c. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies d. Reevaluate feasibility 1. Adequate hydrological conditions (soil saturation /J to within 12 inches of the surface for at least 26 ?/ /? consecutive days in the growing season // - no action *** *** Readings taken during abnormally wet or dry years will be discounted 2. Inadequate hydrological conditions (recourse options) a. Minor regrading b. Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies c. Reevaluate feasibility MITIGATION CREDITS At this time, NCDOT does not have detailed information about the extent of wetlands and drainage modification on the site. For this reason, it is difficult to estimate how much of the property will be useful for mitigation purposes. These questions will be answered by conducting an extensive soil survey of the property. A contract is currently being negotiated to have this work performed. It is apparent that the property will provide sufficient acreage to mitigate for the 13.2 acres of bottomland hardwood habitat impacted by the Fayetteville CBD Loop project. It is proposed that mitigation ratios for this property will be in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Draft Mitigation Guidance. The following ratios may be used to determine needed debit acreages: Restoration 2:1 Creation 3:1 Enhancement 4:1 Preservation 10:1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED Several additional studies will be conducted to finalize the mitigation plan for this site. (1) Most importantly, a hydric soils map will be developed for the site. This map will reveal the location and extent of existing and former wetlands. It will also allow mapping of the hydric/non-hydric soil boundary. As mentioned earlier, a contract is currently being negotiated to have this work done. (2) The hydrologic analysis will be completed. This study will include: (a) A map showing ditches, natural drainages, location of new water control measures, and proposed monitoring wells. (b) Design specifications for proposed water control measures. (c) Feasibility of creation of anadromous fish habitat adjacent to the South River. (3) Feasibility of planting in the cutover areas will be addressed. This information will be provided to the COE/prior to project implementation. It is expected that this remaining information will be compiled by November 1, 1993. a :z. +' Q 1. \ to S-"f .14 all tin 1-4 4b- 04 J_ 00 @ W W A j O 3pDjg O ? c i o u ?• o - ca .n .x u H C u Z7 ` {.LJ v z t f ` l M N ??:: ? 3? V N 6? u 41 OYy:. - c d. E c? Y 3 1 tF<t Fi r4 Q lo w 6 00 44 m z N '? I tit v 3 - E-t ?' C .7 Q -16 N n CV) N U u'f - ? FLr_ 1 0 • o C F x F U z . ;; H zFW o a Z .4 W4 pj ° a 0 rr ot w CL F U h F a salmi