WQ0000520_Staff Comments_20170831

'1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
R
Division of Water Resources
' WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
s` NON-DISCHARGE APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
Division of Water Resources
August 31, 2017
To: . ,; ; :, . .
•
From: Troy Doby, Water Quality Permitting Section-Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Permit Number: WQ0000520 Permit Type: Land Application of Residual Solids(503)
Applicant: City of Burlington Project Type: Major Modification
Owner Type: Municipal Owner in BIMS?Yes
Facility Name: City of Burlington RLAP Facility in BIMS?Yes
Signature Authority: Shane Fletcher Title: Residuals Management Coordinator
Address: Post Office Box 1358, Burlington,North Carolina 27216 County: Alamance
Fee Category: Non-Discharge Major Fee Amount: $395 -Major Modification
Comments/Other Information:
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above-referenced application for your review,
comment, and/or action. Within 45 calendar days,please take the following actions:
® Return this form completed. ® Return a completed staff report.
❑ Attach an Attachment B for Certification. ❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy of this sheet, and
return it to the appropriate Central Office Water Quality Permitting Section contact person listed above.
RO-WQROS Reviewer: a,4 r,6k G I e I Date:
FORM: WQROSNDARR 09-15 Page 1 of 1

Non-Discharge Permitting Review Form
Permit No.:W0000CZ° F ilityName: 1514ril l-rir, C/ ci T iesAJAypo Owner: 61-y 1 Eui11► 4n
❑New Modification ❑ Renewal /
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Inspection conducted within previous 12 months? Yes or❑No
Site visit conducted?❑ Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit:
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Person(s)present:
e. Driving directions:
II. MODIFICATION RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
,,,,, '�, — . Are appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs)for the facility up to date?❑ Yes El No E N/A
�"" ORC:(-51to,,c F�Fld-9-1 Certificate#: 77f 71/5-Backup ORC: Er A t1 Certificate#: /5-2-0 Z
Are the d• i 1 ,maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? E Yes or❑No
If no,p -as- explain:
✓Is the description of existing facilities correct? Yes E No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
' 3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table,etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
.* 4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells,etc.)? ❑ Yes No❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient)acceptable? ❑ Yes No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
6. there any setback conflicts(P.L., Homes, Wells, etc.)for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites?
Yes or❑No; If yes, show conflicts on a ap.NOTES:
4 7. e seasonal or other restrictions be needed? Yes l<No ❑N/A
If yes, describe restrictions& show areas on ma :
Note anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important for
the permit writer to know(i.e.,equipment condition, functio , maintenance,a change in facility ownership,etc.):
VDoes current storage meet requirements? Yes ❑No /A
P5K 4 Satisfactory Operation&Maintenance Plan or Agreement? Yes ❑No ❑N/A
/a5
Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program dequate? ❑Yes ❑N, N/A
If not proposed, is groundwater monitoring program needed?
IX-Are monitoring wells properly constructed and located(review or compliance boundary)? ❑Yes❑No N/A
If no, explain&map:
Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes❑No N/A
Are the application fields coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes❑No N/A
If no, list Lat/Long:
j.2(1-las a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted orn W,Freeboard,Ann.Reports,etc.)? Yes❑No ❑N/A
Summary of findings from review: 2-0! 6, AA A.,-,I. F r k c , v\
❑Review nutrient loadings 0 Review zone/field usages 0 Review waste strength 0 Review soils analyses ❑Review GW data
Page 1 of 2

Note any requests for reduced monitoring or need for increased monitoring, if applicable: NA
/3. Are there any BIMS or other violations noted within the current permit cycle? ❑ Yes or N(No
If yes, explain:
If compliance problems during the permit cycle, has RO been working with the Permittee? Is a solution
underway?
Have all permit compliance schedules been satisfied? iI Yes ElNo❑N/A
If no,explain: /1 '3 D di,� s;�,A �L 10 cLi e i nc1.
List any permit conditions to be removed from permit:
List any conditions/compliance schedules to be included in permit:
/14. Are there y issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes No ❑N/A
If yes, p ease explain:
III. OTHER NOTES:
EJ/kx_i\Zt W %o) V°0 7 qik w �oi 1• - � 'i 4 14.
!/(4L� �•1/1C �/ 1 dt'^G 4071 /�}/'�4/ JK'/�C/ Apt_ iii C�3:f cfDi/ Ayr
J G'v�t� a r{Y151
/ub l+'
We ham. l`i-e--4-,6 K- -r-v1L (:kir L-rr .q..)l (I !, .-+-0v c�
7
Page 2 of 2