WQ0000520_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20170622

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
S.JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Water Resources
Environmental Quality
June 22, 2017
Mr. Hardin Watkins, City Manager
City of Burlington
P.O. Box 1358
Burlington,NC 27216
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
City of Burlington, Residuals Land Application Program
Permit No. WQ0000520
Alamance County
Dear Mr. Watkins:
A compliance evaluation inspection has been conducted of the subject residuals land application
program.North Carolina Division of Water Resources,Winston-Salem Regional Office(DWR)staff
member Justin Henderson performed the inspection on June 21, 2017. Shane Fletcher, Residuals
Coordinator accompanied Mr. Henderson during this inspection. The inspection reflects compliance
with Permit No. WQ0000520.
Please refer to the enclosed compliance inspection report form for additional observations and
comments. If you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact Justin Henderson or me
at(336) 776-9801.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P. E.
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ—WSRO
cc: Mr. Shane Fletcher,Residuals Coordinator—City of [e-mail]
Mr.Brent Collins—EMA Resources, Inc., [e-mail]
Alamance County Environmental Health
WR�tral Office—Permit File WQ0000520
U111111
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0000520 Effective: 08/13/14 Expiration: 07/31/17 Owner: City of Burlington
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: City of Burlington Residuals Land Application Progra
County:Alamance PO Box 1358
Region: Winston-Salem
Burlington NC 272161358
Contact Person: Everett Shane Fletcher Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: LA,
Primary ORC: Everett Shane Fletcher Certification: 988745 Phone: [phone]
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NC0083828 City of Burlington-J.D.Mackintosh,Jr.WTP
NC0023876 City of Burlington-Southside VWVTP
NC0023868 City of Burlington-Eastside WWTP
Inspection Date: 06/21/2017 Entry Time: 09:45AM Exit Time: 02:OOPM
Primary Inspector: Justin L henderson Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids(503)
Facility Status: Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
111 Miscellaneous Questions In Record Keeping Treatment
▪ Sampling III Land Application Site II Pathogen and Vector Attraction
▪ Storage
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit WQ0000520 Owner-Facility:City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 06/21/2017 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On June 21,2017 WSRO staff conducted a routine compliance inspection of the subject facility.The inspection consisted of
a review of records at the residuals coordinator's office and a review of several land application sites that had recently
received biosolids. Land application was not actively occuring at the time of this inspection due to recenct rainfall events.
All pathogen and vector attraction reduction records reviewed suggested compliance with 503 regulations and permit
requirements.
The following land applicaiton sites were visited:
NC-AM-120, NC-AM-121, NC-AM-123, NC-AM-I3,NC-AM-73, NC-AM-118
Access restriction and signage was present.
Livestock had been removed from all recently applied application sites.
Flagging and buffers observed on all recenctly operated application sites sites suggested compliance with subject permit.
Page: 2

W W ❑ El El El El El El ■ ❑ ■ ■ El El ❑ ❑ ElODD W ❑ El El VI
a < ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ODD ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ � � ■ ■ ❑ 0
z 0z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0) 0 El ❑ Ela
_o co
a N
y- a)
N o
e •- a)
co E
...=
c ya)
'c
7 CO
C
o N
>`� ..+
C a) E E
W
co co
0 > 3 7
C w m _c3 0
8 LL LL
m c as C C.) 0
o a m co
y o C N c) c)
U U
s. a O 3 O O
2 m E y v uoi m m
U. c m E c`• a) a) N N
c E E p o o w m co
m n m co C < ZS c�
CO
CO
C `� ") o N E o 0
�, �, c.. m iA co .c .c
LI2 P m E m �. y c L. m m < m
n• ` 'c3 CO V) i. m C'• 'u) O N .N. N C C a' 0) 0) co U)
m 0 c m o C C. z m C a7 •'� m v C C m CO
p o o m rn a .0 .. g 0 o a m _ C o Zd o T p U U
Q 0 V N �p Es N a) .N .0 C` N •N U C. Cp 0. O a3 < p C O O
w n �' a) 7 v a)a) cep a • V v p m c m o E m E N N
O 'O {Ep C O. �) C U lL C a) u) co N m C 0 u) Li- N O U O 0 co m _ .
N N- O N O E .m.. 0 0 —_ m V 512 -c fa a7 O. N n . L
O O Z >N O) V O "O' C C C d O. C W V N fp N co /p
00 (Ni •> O 8 C yC (n .O € m �p m y C •C (/� C m U a) N N
p C O '� 'O m E Y a) O 7 n < N G n m m
c� > � c` E n a m n m y v o Q N TA E E c c
(7 m c 8 — L` 0 € C CO CO CO c '5 m CO C a V co U j 0) p m m
O m O O 0 >. C C L_ Q w w > V CO a7 m a) O g N N N To— f0
a) c E m m m m a) a) o r 0 E c t c E r- N w m m
�-' c a) 0 'v a p- CO y c 05 .0 3 c N N E p N N m 8 co a) N a rn
CD p co Cf w 8 C N E m N N o E c n v v a 8 fA -c c > E r c ci c w
• 2 O) N O
a c v o 0 m r E a n H $ ami g c co a) F a) 8 8
4 c a p 1. > U co m m z A $ Q E € E
& H to = S co 4-' O
q O .- Y O v0) fO a O C C C .0 0 M. n c,„ t C C) € U E c 8 C w •C N e
• c _ n E 0 0' n 0 py a Z Z 0 d EN '� .7 n n m a8) m a) 8 a) 2 2
Q a a0.
mI 0 v o C9tm. 8 c�i 'c n a `—° rm. w c m t z = E 5 u U 0 a8i 0 n n
y c a m (� co m m m m m m E o E 2 m 4 • _1 & 'A a a A A • . < = a < a a a a 00 = 0 Cr 0o C7 ci

permit: W00000520 Owner-Facility:City of Burlington
inspection Date: 06/21/2017 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Temperature corrected •
d. Salmonella(Class A,all test must be<3MPN/4 gram day) ❑ ❑ E ❑
e. Time/Temp on: 001110
Digester(MCRT) ❑
Compost ❑
Class A lime stabilization ❑
f. Volatile Solids Calculations 00110
g. Bench-top Aerobic/Anaerobic digestion results 0011E1
Comment: Pathogen Reduction Records were reviewed for both the East and South Burlington VVVVfP's
during this inspection.All data reviewed suggested compliance with pathogen reduction
requirements.
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Check all that apply
Aerobic Digestion ❑
Anaerobic Digestion ❑
Alkaline Pasteurization(Class A) 0
Alkaline Stabilization(Class B) •
Compost ❑
Drying Beds ❑
Other ❑
Comment:
Sampling Yes No NA NE
Describe sampling:
Is sampling adequate? • 000
Is sampling representative? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Land Application Site Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of the permit on-site during application events? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application site in overall good condition? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? • ❑ ❑ ❑
If present,is the application equipment in good operating condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are buffers being maintained? 111000
Are limiting slopes buffered?
10%for surface application • ❑ ❑ ❑
18%for subsurface application ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there access restrictions and/or signs? MOOD
Page: 4

•
permit: WO0000520 Owner-Facility:City of Burlington
Inspection Date: 06/21/2017 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Is the application site free of odors or vectors? U 0 0 0
Have performance requirements for application method been met?
For injection? ❑ ❑ • ❑
For incorporation? ❑ ❑ • ❑
Does permit require monitoring wells? 0 0 I 0
Have required MWs been installed? ❑ ❑ • 0
Are MWs properly located w/respect to RB and CB? 0 0 0
Are MWs properly constructed(including screened interval)? 0 0 • 0
Is the surrounding area served by public water? 0 0 11 0
If Annual Report indicates overapplication of PAN,are wells nearby that may be impacted? 0 0 II 0
Are soil types consistent w/Soil Scientist report/evaluation? 0 0 0
Is the water table greater than 1'/3'bls. II 0 ❑ 0
Is application occurring at the time of the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Application was not occurinq at the time this inspection was performed due to recent weather
conditions. Several sites that had received recent application of biosolids were visited as part of
this inspection.All flagging and buffers at the sites visited suggested compliance with all
applicable setbacks.
Page: 5

• North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Section
NON-DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT 'f
CLASS B RESIDUALS LAND APPLICATION ,0 , ,
General Information "
/� � 1� t
Facility Name:�ki t r&a'dn GoIYI. i$ 01-4,,95.g County: f iar r.c,c c
Permit No.:W0000O5 Z O Permit Issuance Date: 0'5 -2_12-0T
Owner: C r 1 vs- 31.,c Q.,,,i—,i^ Permit Expiration Date: -7-31-17
Plant ORC Name: ,�1...o,,-•t, )-' ,fir Telephone No.: 334 C 7.5 5,2.7
LA ORC/Contract Company: 61N1- Q4.5purtvS ).54440Telephone No.: 3 —407 - 5'8'z-
Other Contact(s): ri/1s Telephone No.:
Facility Location(address,gps or d1irections : i''O rr _ et-1-- /k 7 T on I ) Ff 7 S
TL- ` 2?s0r-V, IIe ,2d / a,y'wcpL Rd / a,r, '54--41— '
Reas,n for Inspection
[ tOUTINE ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑COMPLAINT ❑PERMITTING ❑Other:
Comments(attach additional pages as necessary)
- ? 'fir �.c r. c)--7 ? �/
I-•0 ✓
/ l
�W�,� 0` i's' ov,. Lh `6Lt"e- ai J--6' 0ioi P/C--
Z`))Z (' Qi'P1`t 2 J
'' l e.,'n�er
r.C ,b,a wte- SCi,�o��S. 5��� rroost��pS/ 5�,11 r1��.
dl 011' Y� �1.G-f\ ? Orrc 'aNc4 fv S ,m
. Cos c/ ter..\ ,- 6.-\ 0,.1\ ry.n.r..ne et.)xl>n.e N1-? ✓ 0
,'11 CocOrc-d 1 ?tcxn en 4-ro-r's"�C ter}- -l- airy l,'c.c,}, V e(‘c Ae S ,�c�Qe tea,
3,SI N0 (t b*N0t.Q..S 6bvsg.k_ (I' 4:71
kcl 1. No T I dAirI'^o3 uc2a�)e, �w`.-. 2�a��— (7 ► 6) lige� 6 V t
wI ►r 2� tics o - d ' 5 or c(ej 4-cs
3.1 N o > fo Zo s tit N° D<?Q 6"A)
r‘r-9
3,10 (Ue9. reSte-IL4-.2-Lr -Fr) r 30 d44S
3. 1t No s(o,2-(rN% 04,1 rc,o�S r. 36 dais O s L -
3 u)-2)'' Any e4- --' c.o -( "-n-) s o rca5
�, (LL- ' le ✓ c,V,- % rce 7
Is a follow-up inspection necessary? ❑Yes ' " o
Primary Inspector: 3U,4111 } ' QSUn Secondary Inspector: ( I
Date of Inspection: 6 - Z)— I 1 Entry Time: 1 S 45. Exit Time:

Non-Discharge Compliance Inspection Report •
Residuals Generating Facility 3 - 5 5 `� ���
Was the residuals generating facility inspected? ❑Yes 0 No Iluu
Residuals Storage: tk g��s �z Z @ S�l.,000 grltcn5 2-
(" .? 3C5
Describe storage: SOv91)-100 5a�t"S 1 Cp 140 ,”1"
Number of days/weeks/months of storage: 'N, 1 b b 6
Residuals Sampling: Y N NA NE
Is sampling adequate and representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Describe Sampling:
Transport Vehicle: Y N NA NE
Is transport occurring at time of inspection? CI [^ ❑ ❑
Are necessary records(i.e.permit&spill plan)present in vehicle?ID of observed vehicle(s): ❑ ❑ R' ❑
Record Keeping and Reporting Information: Y�,/ N NA NE
Is current permit and prior annual reports available upon request? LK" CI CI CI
❑ CI ❑
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 m�on 12'
TCLP analysis conducted and results available? Frequency?2 /yr or El 1/permit cycle [�/' ❑ CI CI
Residuals metals and nutrient analysis conducted?Frequency?.�(See permit for frequency) [" El ❑ ❑
pc --Nutrient and metals loading calculations?(to determine most limiting parameter) 'r(,o d c_.4.5❑ Cl CIrA Do lab sheets support data reported on Residuals Analysis Summary? j [" ❑ ❑ ❑
4, la-� Are PAN balance records available and within permit limits?EM . �g CI CI CI [4
St Are there nutrient(crop)removal practices in place? �`�� QY ❑ ❑ ❑
Are hauling records available?(gal and/or tons hauled during cale�year to date) l ❑ ❑ ❑�, /
Are field loading records available? eta- oc ems-=, L�rc 4A 0 ❑ ❑ [i
cit Are field inspections conducted and are records available? [' ❑ ❑ El ,'
Are soil sample results available? CI CI CI ❑/
Did soil results call for lime amendment?If so,are there records of application? ❑ ❑ ❑
t;, Soil results indicate that Cu&Zn indices are<3,000(ideally<2,000)? CI CI CI
k i. Soil results indicate Na<0.5 meq/100 cm3,and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage(ESP)<15%? El ❑^ � CI
the permit require groundwater monitoring? ❑ L.�/ i4
Are groundwater lab results present? ❑ ❑ [�r,/ CI
There are no 2L GW standard violations indicated in the lab results? CI CI [ ❑
Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Records
Pathogen Reduction:
Which Alternative was used to demonstrate compliance?
❑Alterna' - 1 Fecal Coliform Density
El Alternative 2 ' ocess to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(5 options
El Alternative 3 Use Equivalent to RSRP(Not commonly used- .ee White House Manual)
If Alternative 2 was used, se . t which Option was utilized and omplete the section below.
❑Option 1 -Aerobic Digestio Y N NA NE
Are logs present showing ti •- and temperat . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the time&temp.between - i days . •:°F(20°C)and 60 days at 59°F(15°C)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑Option 2-Air Drying.
❑Option 3-Anaerobic Digestion
Are logs present showi i_time and temperature. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the time&to •..between 15 days at 95°F— 1 °F(35°-55°C)and
60 days at>68° (20°C)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑Option 4—Co ..•sting(Not commonly used-See White House Man
[ tion 5-Lime Stabilization
Are logs present showing time and temperature? ^/ ❑ CI CI
Was the pH raised to>12 after two hrs of contact? L^id'/ ❑ CI CI
Was the temperature corrected to 25°C(77°F)(by calculation,NOT auto correct)? [d ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 2 of 4

• Non-1:)ikeharge Compliance Inspection Report
Vector Attraction Reduction:
Select which Option was used to demonstrate compliance and complete answer associated questions.
❑Op'e n 1 -38%Volatile Solids Reduction Y N NA
•.e lab results and calculations present? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Wa e reduction on volatile solids(not total solids)? ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑
Were : pies collected at correct locations?
(beginnin: .f digestion process&before land application)
Was there a 8%reduction? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑Option 2-40-Day Ben • Scale Test Y ► NA NE
Were residuals from aerobic digestion? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Are lab results and calcu<tions present? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Was the test anaerobically I•.ested in lab,and test run for 40 days? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the test done between 30' (86°F)and 37°C(99°F)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the reduction of on volatile 'lids(not total solids)? ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ • ❑❑
Was the reduction less than 17%?
❑Option 3-30-Day Bench Scale Test Y N NA NE
Were residuals from aerobic digestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab results and calculations present? ❑❑ El❑ ❑❑ ❑❑
Were residuals 2%or less total solids?
If not 2%total solids,was the test ran on a sample I' uted to 2%
with unchlorinated effluent? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the test run for 30 days? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the test done at 20°C(68°F)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the reduction of on volatile solids(not total so:i s)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the reduction less than 15%? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑Option 4-Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate(SOUR .'est) Y N NA NE
Were residuals form aerobic digestion? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Were residuals<2%total solids(dry . -ight basis)(not diluted)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the test done between 10°C(5e'F)and 30°C(86°F)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the temperature corrected t• 0°C(68°F)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the sampling holding ti .- <2 hours? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the test started withi 5 minutes of sampling or aeration maintained? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the SOUR equal ti sr less than 1.5 mg of oxygen per hour per gram of
total residual solids :ry weight basis)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑Option 5- 14-Day A- •bic Process Y N NA NE
Were the res.. als from aerobic digestion? ❑ ❑ ! ❑
Was the : erage residuals temperature higher than 45°C(113°F)? ❑ ❑ 0\ ❑
Were e residuals treated for 14 days and temperature maintained higher
than 40°C(104°F)for the 14-day period? ❑ ❑ ❑ NEI
Option 6-Alkaline Stabilization Y N NA NE
Was the pH of the residuals raised to>12 and maintained for two hours
without addition of more alkali? , ❑ ❑ ❑
Did the pH of residuals remain at>11.5 an additional twenty-two hours
without the addition of more alkali? ❑ ❑ ❑
Was the pH corrected to 25°C(77°F)(by calculation,NOT auto correct)? ❑ ❑ ❑
-Drying of Stabilized Residuals Y N NA NE
The res o not contain unstabilized residuals? ❑ ❑
Were the residuals my n other materials? ❑ ❑
Were the residuals dried>75%tota so' . ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑Option 8-Drying of Unstabilized Residuals Y N NA NE
Were the residuals mixed with an materials?Were the residuals ' _ o total solids? ❑ ❑ 9-------g
❑Optio — jection/Incorporation of Residuals(Not commonly used-See White House Manual)
Page 3 of 4

Non-l)ischarge Compliance Inspection Report
t`)o Cvre-Cf eq�►v-sZ__,
Land Application Site(s) (, Vt2 '►,-,)
Were application site(s)inspected? If so,please list Site ID(s)below. Yes ❑No
Application Site ID(s): 1_l�C P 1 0F\.'D 3 t\t.tj ►h i3ltr� Art.-1?j 3� )c3, )2.0 i t 1 1
Is application occurring at the time of inspection? If no,note the date of the last event: ['Yes El No
Weather Conditions:
El Sunny illy Cloudy El Cloudy ❑Overcast El Stormy
❑Windy (wind direction: ) reeze ❑Calm
El No Precipitation rizzle Rain El Cloudburst (If applicable,precipitation measurement: )
Is there a rain gauge onsite? IIVres ❑No
Weather Notes(i.e.Significant Changes,Forecasts,etc): OV t 'ctc (A)I fd P`� 1 ,1/4- Z'�fo'4 n oce..„.,24, al
Temp.(°F): ❑<32 El 32—40 ❑40—60 El 60—80 El>80 6efv c 4.— ,`t._5>P G i
Was the Division notified of the application event(s)? es / ❑No
Permit and Spill Plan onsite during application? es El No
Application Observations: [Type of application: El Liquid El Cake El Other
Application Site—Field ID(s): Application Site—Field ID(s):
Intended Crop: PAN Requirement: lbs/ac Intended Crop: PAN Requirement: lbs/ac
Application Rate(gallons/acre): Application Rate(gallons/acre):
Nutrient Content: Nutrient Content:
Application occurring at time of visit: 0 Yes 0 No Application occurring at time of visit: 0 Yes 0 No
Application Method:❑Surface❑Incorp/Injection Application Method:❑Surface 0 Incorp/Injection
Incorporation/Injection during visit:❑Yes❑No❑N/A Incorporation/Injection during visit:0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Vegetative Buffer description:alone ['Grass ❑Crop 0 Shrub Vegetative Buffer description:❑None ❑Grass
❑Tree 0 Other ❑Crop El Shrub
['Tree 0 Other
Current Field Conditions: Current Field Conditions:
❑Bare 0 Stubble 0 Planted (crop) 0 Pasture 0 Bare 0 Stubble ❑Planted (crop) ❑Pasture
Soil Condition: Soil Condition:
❑Dry 0 Moist 0 Wet ❑Saturated 0 Dry 0 Moist 0 Wet 0 Saturated
❑Not-Frozen ❑Frost 0 Frozen ❑Snow-Covered 0 Not-Frozen 0 Frost ❑Frozen 0 Snow-Covered
Slope:❑0-3% ❑3-6% 0 6-10% 0 10-18% 0>18% Slope:❑0-3% 0 3-6% ❑6-10% 0 10-18% ❑>18%
Odor: 0 None 0 Mild 0 Moderate 0 Strong Odor: 0 None 0 Mild ❑Moderate ❑Strong
Vectors: 0 None ❑Few 0 Many ❑Excessive Vectors: 0 None 0 Few ❑Many El Excessive
Application Details: Y N NA NE Application Details: Y N NA NE
Application areas clearly marked? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Application areas clearly marked? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Application within authorized area? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Application within authorized area? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Application method appropriate? 0 0 0 0 Application method appropriate? 0 0 ❑ 0
Application is even(no ponding)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Application is even(no ponding)? 0 0 0 ❑
Sufficient setbacks from wells/residences? 0 0 0 0 Sufficient setbacks from wells/residences? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Sufficient setbacks from surface waters? DODO Sufficient setbacks from surface waters? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Slopes>10%avoided(Surface App.)? ❑ ❑ 0 0 Slopes>10%avoided(Surface App.)? 0 0 0 ❑
Slopes>18%avoided(IncorpMject)? ❑ 0 0 0 Slopes>18%avoided(Incorp/Inject)? 0 0 0 0
Incorp./Injection within time-frame? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Incorp.Mjection within time-frame? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Biosolids visible on surface? 0 0 ❑ 0 Biosolids visible on surface? 0 0 0 0
Site Restrictions Y N NA NE Site Restrictions Y N NA NE
Public access is restricted/Signage present? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Public access is restricted/Signage present? 0 0 ❑ 0
Grazing restrictions are met? 0 0 0 ❑ Grazing restrictions are met? ❑ 0 ❑ 0
Transfer of biosolids is in permitted area? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Transfer of biosolids is in permitted area? 0 0 0 0
No evidence of shallow GW? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ No evidence of shallow GW? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Sufficient timing for harvest restrictions? 0 0 0 0 Sufficient timing for harvest restrictions? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Off Site Transport Y N NA NE Off Site Transport Y N NA NE
Tracking is prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Tracking is prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Biosolids run-off is prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Biosolids run-off is prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Windblown biosolids prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Windblown biosolids prevented? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Vegetative buffers exist? 0 0 0 0 Vegetative buffers exist? 0 0 0 0
Page 4 of 4

0
L 040 d dSv_r_ Z��
wad I.io4 jO I--p �1 d�?y "r"t nl U A I i'i 0,1