Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG551768_Application_20200520 kis. 10,t.,.. r ) ROY COOPER Governor 't 49 l+ + lt MICHAEL S.REGAN k 4,Qwu•�._.vR.�... Secretary S. DANIEL SMITH NOR III CAROL INA Director Environmental Quality May 22, 2020 David Hunt David G Hunt 3007 Redwood Rd Durham, NC 27704 Subject: Permit Renewal Application No. NCG551768 3007 Redwood Road Durham County Dear Applicant: The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your application for a new NPDES WW permit, including supporting documentation and your check number 6135 in the amount of $60.00 as payment of the application fee. These items were received in our offices on May 20, 2020. Your application will be assigned to a permit writer within the Section's NPDES WW permitting branch. The permit writer will contact you if additional information is required to complete evaluation of your application. Your timely and direct response to any such request will help to expedite the review process. Please note that acceptance of the application does not guarantee a NPDES permit will be issued for the proposed activity. A permit will only be issued following a complete review of the application, concluding the proposed discharge is allowable per applicable statutes and rules. Information regarding the status of your renewal application can be found online using the Department of Environmental Quality's Environmental Application Tracker at: https://deq.nc.gov/permits-regulations/permit-guidance/environmental-application-tracker If you have any additional questions about the permit, please contact the primary reviewer of the application using the links available within the Application Tracker. Sincerely, Wren Thedford Administrative Assistant Water Quality Permitting Section ec: WQPS Laserfiche File w/application DE_ -# North Care-n5DepertnentoFEnvTonments ^Qua-tp I DwsonofWaterReaouroes -�1) Rs a gh Regana Off oe 13800 Barrett Dr ve I Rs'e�,North Caroima 27609 °.':"`ri"""�""\deo' 919-791-4200 ,JIfl6 k9�ltytt� Engineers and Soil Scientists • Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 20314 Apex, North Carolina 27502 C-Q.SI7 919-859-0669 www.agriwaste.com May 8,2020 Mr. Charles Weaver NPDES Permitting Program sp 5/207v Division of Water Quality RECEIVED 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 MAY 2 0 2020 NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES RE: Letter Requesting Coverage under the General Permit—Hunt Property. 3007 Redwood Road,Durham,NC 27704 Dear Mr.Weaver, Please consider this letter as a request for coverage under the General Permit for a Multi-Phase Filter System. The proposed discharge system is for a 3-Bedroom Single Family Residence (SFR) located in Durham County, North Carolina. The proposed discharge system will replace the unpermitted 3-bedroom system that serves the residence. Christopher McGee, LSS, Agri- Waste Technology, Inc., has deemed the site unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems due to inadequate soil conditions and unsuitable topography. The proposed system is to be sized for 3 bedrooms at 360 gallons/day. The residence is located at 3007 Redwood,Durham, NC 27704. This is being submitted with the intent to have coverage under the NCG55 General Permit. Coverage under this permit is sought to replace an unpermitted sand filter system. The following information is included with this letter: - NCG55OOOO. Attachment A. $60 check payable to North Carolina DENR. - Documentation from Durham County Attachment B. - Soils Evaluation report by Chris McGee of AWT,Inc. Attachment C. - Correspondence from USGS. Attachment D. - Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature.Attachment E. - Information on Connecting to Regional Sewer. Attachment F. Engineering Alternatives Analysis(EAA).Attachment G. - Local Government Review Forms. Attachment H. - Process Flow Schematic Attachment I. The existing sand filter system at the Hunt residence is piped together with the system that is located at 4712 Mannix Road, Durham, NC 27704. The property located at 4712 Mannix Road currently has an existing discharge permit (NCG550790). The flow path of the current system can be seen in Attachment E. Upon issuance of the Certificate of Coverage, the new design would relocate the discharge point to a roadside ditch along side Mannix Road that also has an existing Certificate of Coverage under permit NCG551232. This discharge point is located in the right-of-way for Mannix Road, but to access the roadside ditch, an easement will be issued to cross the property located at 4712 Mannix Road, Durham, NC 27704. The flow path that is being proposed can be seen in Attachment E. The discharge system will utilize the following components: - Septic Tank with Effluent Filter - AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod - Re-circulation Pump Chamber(Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System) - UV Disinfection - Discharge Point with Rip-Rap Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature The proposed discharge location is in a roadside ditch, a parcel away, that has an existing certificate of coverage that serves 3011 Redwood Road, Durham, NC 27704. This roadside ditch flows into an unnamed tributary to Panther Creek in the Neuse River Basin. A map showing the path from the discharge point to the first existing certificate of coverage area, as shown on the Durham County GIS data,can be seen in Attachment E. NCG550000 As part of the application,the feasibility of alternatives to discharging must be addressed. The following alternatives are to be evaluated: - Connection to a regional or municipal sewer collection system. - Durham County Documentation - Investigate land application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation. Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System Connection to a sewer collection system is not feasible for this facility. Engineering Services of the Durham Public Works Department, indicated that the property is not within the city's coverage area. The closest current city-maintained sewer is approximately 2,800 linear ft. from the property and there are no immediate plans for a sewer extension to the area at this time (Attachment F). For reference, if an installation cost of$100/ft of installed sewer line was assumed, the cost to connect this property to the sewer line would be approximately$280,000. Durham County Documentation The original sand filter permit issued by Durham County Health Department is included in Attachment B. The system has a history of malfunctioning. The NCDEQ has issued t , multiple Pump and Haul permits for the Hunt property. This indicates that the sand filter system that currently serves the property is underperforming. (Attachment B). Investigate Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation. Per the soil evaluation by Chris McGee of Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. the site does not have sufficient space or suitable soil characteristics to accommodate a non-discharge surface spray or drip wastewater system(Attachment C). 7Q10 Flow Estimate The United States Geological Survey(USGS)was contacted to determine the 7Q10 flow estimate for the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed discharge point is in a roadside ditch that leads to an unnamed tributary to Panther Creek. The analysis from USGS indicates the 7Q10 discharge for the point in question is likely zero (Attachment D). Engineering Alternatives Analysis An Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA)has been completed for this site and is included as Attachment G. In my opinion, the completed EAA demonstrates that a wastewater treatment system permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit is the only feasible option for this site. We have exhausted all other options for this site as follows: a.) connection to a municipal or regional sewer collection system - Not feasible due to costs. b.) subsurface disposal - No suitable soil for a subsurface absorption system. c.) single-family residence wastewater irrigation (drip and spray) - Unsuitable soil and insufficient space for a non-discharge ground absorption system. d.) reclaimed-water systems - No suitable soil for a reclaimed water system. No reasonable ability to operate as a bulk distributor of reclaimed water. e.) Any viable combination of the above - There are no viable combinations of the above due to soil and cost limitations. Local Government Review Forms As part of the EAA, Local Government Review Forms were sent to Durham County and the City of Durham. A copy of the submittal is included as Attachment H. t I appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669. Best Regards, Kevin Davidson,P.E. V.P. of Engineering Attachment List Attachment A NCG550000 Attachment B Documentation From Durham County Attachment C AWT Soils Evaluation Report Attachment D 1. Correspondence from USGS 2. Stream Classification Attachment E Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature Attachment F Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System Attachment G Engineering Alternatives Analysis Attachment H Local Government Review Forms Attachment I Process Flow Schematic T • Attachment A NCG550000 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System FOR AGENCY USE ONLY (NPDES) Date Received NC Division of Water Resources Application for SURFACE DISCHARGE Year Month Day Environmental Certificate of Coverage (COC)Under 05 ao Quality General Permit NCG550000 Certificate of Coverage(COC) For Single-Family Residences and Similar Discharges N C G 5 5 100%-domestic wastewater-< 1,000 gallons per day Check# Amount Assigned to: The Division of Water Resources will not accept an application package unless all instructions are followed. Failure to submit all required items may result in the application being returned. For more information, visit the WaterQualityPermittingSection's NPDES PermittingUnit website. (Press TAB to navigate form) g f ) 1. Regional Office Contact: Please contact your DWR Regional Office before submitting this application. If you have not met with your appropriate DWR Regional Office Representative,the application will be returned. Please list the DWR Regional Office representative(s)with whom you have discussed this project: Name(s): Jane Bernard Date: 5/7/2020 RECEIVED 2. Owner's Contact Information: MAY 2 0 2020 Applicant Type: ®Individual ❑Corporation ❑ Partnership NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES Owner Name and Title: David Hunt Street Address: 3007 Redwood Road City: Durham State: NC Zip:27704-Click here to enter text. Telephone#(H): Telephone#(W): Cell/Mobile#: 919-323-7185 Email: dghunt@outlook.com 3. Location of Facility Producing the Discharge: Please list the address of the facility. If facility is not yet constructed,give street address or lot number. Street Address: 3007 Redwood Road City: Durham State: NC Zip: 27704- County: Durham Telephone#: 919-323-7185 Cell/Mobile#: Website: 4. Site-Location Narrative: Please describe how to get to the facility from the nearest town,major highway or identifiable roadway intersection(use street names, state road numbers,and/or distances and directions). From downtown Raleigh,take US-70 for 12.6 miles to Brier Creek Parkway in Leesville.Take Olive Branch Road to NC-98 W in Oak Grove for 5.3 miles.Turn left on NC-98 W,follow for 0.4 Page 1 of 7 Revised:A. Orlando NPDES 21 Sept2017 Application for Certificate of Coverage(COC)and/or Authorization to Construct(ATC) under General-Permit NCG550000 miles. Take Stallings Road and Fletchers Chapel Road to Redwood Road.3007 Redwood Road is on the left. 5. Describe the nature of the project. ["New"means has not yet been physically constructed,"existing" means system already physically exists. Please see 15A NCAC 02H .0103(11) for further clarification]. ❑ Installation of a New Wastewater Treatment System(Ifyes,skip to Number 9.) ❑ Expansion of an Existing Wastewater Treatment System(for example,adding bedrooms) (If yes, skip to Number 9.) ❑ Replacement of an Existing Wastewater Treatment System(Ifyes,go to Number 6.) 6. Describe the Existing Wastewater Treatment System: ❑ Conventional Septic Tank/Leach-field—Discharge to Sub-Surface Soils.If previously permitted, please attach a copy of the permit or enter the permit number If you are not aware of an existing permit,check here. ❑ • Sandfilter—Discharge to Surface Waters [or other,as defined 15A NCAC 02H.0103(11)J. If previously permitted,please attach a copy of the permit or enter the permit number DCHD No. 9213.If you are not aware of an existing permit,check here. ❑ ❑ Filter Media System(Pod System)—Discharge to Surface Waters [or other,as defined 15A NCAC 02H.0103(11)].If previously permitted,please attach a copy of the permit or the permit number. If you are not aware of an existing permit,check here. ❑ ❑ Other ❑ Check here if submitting proposal for a new system or if no treatment system exists. 7. Check all EXISTING wastewater treatment components: ® Septic tank ❑Dosing tank ❑ U V disinfection Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ❑ Recirculating sand filter(s) ❑ Chlorination ❑ Dechlorination ❑ Other components: ❑ Self-Contained POD system[describe] ❑Leach Field ❑Post Aeration(specify type) 8. Provide Details of Single-Family Residence(SFR)or Similar Facility: a) Type of facility: ®Residential ❑Commercial ['Other: b) Amount of wastewater discharged: Page 2 of 7 Revised.A. Orlando NPDES 21 Sept2017 r � Application for Certificate of Coverage(COC)and/or Authorization to Construct(ATC) under General-Permit NCG550000 - Residential:Number of bedrooms 3 x 120 gallons per bedroom=360 gallons per day(flow) - Commercial: How many employees?(25 gpd/person) c) Is your existing treatment system failing? Yes ® No ❑ d) Has the Health Department formally condemned your existing system "unsuitable for repair?" Yes ® No ❑ If yes,please name the Health Department[local,county,or state],and provide the site- inspection date [attach Health Department's judgement letter,if available]: From the multiple pump and haul permits that were issued to the property,we can assume that Durham County Health Department has deemed the system failing. 10/8/2018 If previously permitted[local,county,or state],provide permit number and date issued[attach copy,if available]: DCHD No.9213 9. Check all PROPOSED new system components ® Septic tank ❑Dosing tank ® UV disinfection: ❑Primary sand filter ❑ Secondary sand filter ® Recirculating sand filter(s) ❑Chlorination ❑Dechlorination ❑ Other components: ❑Self-Contained POD system[describe] ®Post Aeration(specify type) Riprap at discharge ❑ Proposed Modifications to Existing Treatment System-Explain in detail the nature of the modification.Attach all site maps,plans and specifications,signed by an NC Certified Engineer. If prepared by others,plans must conform to 15A NCAC 02H.0139. ® Proposed New Treatment System for Surface Dischargejnot constructed)-Attach all site maps, plans and specifications,to be signed by an NC Certified Engineer. If prepared by others,plans must conform to 15A NCAC 02H .0139. Will be completed for Authorization to Construct application if Certificate of Coverage is issued. Expanding Flow?-Do you propose to increase permitted or existing flow? ❑Yes ® No Provide details of the Proposed NEW Discharge[Flow and Source Water]: ®Check if same as 6. Existing:Amount of wastewater currently discharged: Number of bedrooms 3 x 120 gallons per bedroom= 360 gallons per day to be permitted(design flow) Expanding: Amount of wastewater proposed to be discharged:Number of bedrooms x 120 gallons per bedroom= gallons per day to be permitted(design flow Page 3 of 7 Revised:A. Orlando NPDES 21 Sept2017 Application for Certificate of Coverage(COC) and/or Authorization to Construct(ATC) under General-Permit NCG550000 10. Evaluate Alternatives to Discharge to Waters of the State.Please address the feasibility of discharge alternatives as instructed in the NCDEQ Engineering Alternatives Analysis(EAA) Guidance Document found here. (Note:Evaluation for endangered species is not required.) a) Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System-Provide the distance to the nearest connection,such as a regional or municipal sewer system,and the estimated cost per foot to connect including fees. Click here to enter text. b) Land Application—Assess the land application disposal alternatives such as spray irrigation,drip irrigation,individual/community onsite subsurface systems,and/or innovative ground-absorption. Questions to consider: (1) Are on-site soils suitable for land application? Yes ❑ No (2) Is there sufficient area on-site? Yes ❑ No Ei c) Wastewater Reuse—Evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated,such as for golf course irrigation,crop irrigation(e.g.,hardwood or pine plantation,grasses),athletic field irrigation,landscape uses,and/or commercial/industrial uses. d) On-Site Soil Evaluation—Submit an evaluation of the soils on-site, documented by a certified report from a NC Professional Soil Scientist,or by your local or county health department report(if available). e) Cost of Alternatives—Provide an estimation of the cost of each discharge alternative or combination of alternatives. 11. Provide Regional Information: Please provide the following information.If you need assistance in obtaining this information,please contact your local DEO regional office. a) Stream Classification-Verify the stream classification for the nearest downgradient named waterbody. The NC Surface Water Classification map can be found by clicking here. WS-IV,B;NSW,CA b) Is it a High-Quality Water?If so,check if it is by definition or by designation?In order to check this,ask the Planning Unit. c) Map-Provide a map locating the nearest downstream waters-of-the-State(i.e.where the effluent reaches an unnamed tributary,creek,stream,river,or lake via any surface-water conveyance). d) Site Evaluation-Contact DEO's local Regional Office for a site evaluation to confirm the proposed discharge flow path to the nearest waters-of-the-State.The wastewater/stream confluence and stream class must be verified in the field by DEQ's Regional Staff. Please list the Regional Office staff member you contacted for the inspection. e) Flow Path-Display graphically the flow path of the discharge to the nearest surface Waters of the State. Document any potential hydrologic trespass or right-of-way infringement on any neighboring property(i.e.note all properties encountered prior to reaching waters-of-the-State). Page 4 of 7 Revised:A. Orlando NPDES 21 Sept2017 IIIIIPIMMIIImm 41 .., : O 4ti Lopo.'' I 1 'am. _ -01 I f. — !... . .1 .Q . .0 .c li 11F « « 4 & ' ' VI 1 t? 4 f , i v ii. I i II s.. - w . it i 4 f. e, I i . , t ill, 1 , - . : • ..., - pir Oa- 1 ic,1 1 E ..* Itt.' i,-- ". "-- ,-« 11 a - 1L. -4 . I, 4•Ir 1 5 1 71411 - . 4' ... ir ..t MI A A . 1 a A"'T .. I. 1 VL. ...0 1 A m..„ 1 !.., * - * ak 1 A 4 1 - . ! 1 a vira 4 * . ix t! i .. 4 1 1 li *1 1 1 I , 4 i 1 1 , . i t: 1 1 .1 • at , I 4,* -1 1 4: PI i j 1 i i i I I it; II tr. . . .„ _ 1 J e 4 1 :IC ', f . _ 1 ,. ' I 3 I t 3 1 it 1 'Z. '-'..., i i - i e - j1 An i e w., X 11 4. - :** " ' ilb ''''' ip. A 1 i t . t tA -1 71 -t- i „, ... x. 1 A .., ' r a, A - ,... c 1 , 1 4 z -A 1 iiik. 414 .: ,, - 1 1 crW i 1 i h lit Z. g rif 71 ; "i 1 _ $ ;.. i 1 . „.1. 1 i ; I . . "pl 1 i it t I = - C it A - t I I •=''1 -.4" ' ' *:. 1 / 41 1 ''.I.'i! 1 ir....7, :.:--- ... I 0 0 _ a 1., I ';' .. 3 .* 1 I I 'at.2''''‘‘. iii6r. i ...7.7 ! I 1 t.. : livit ' .2 r; 1 i , t 1— r I WI 1 0 - ,..: ; _ _ ; _ 4, -31. 4 k ii 4 .... t '''S i t tg ir II 1 _ , = '-= , ! ON it ira a ,6,..., 1 * -.* .ie ii -,4 Li i _0 • wit, f. . , Application for Certificate of Coverage(COC) and/or Authorization to Construct(ATC) under General-Permit NCG550000 NOTE: Treatment System Maintenance is Required-Upon receiving a Certificate of Coverage/Authorization to Construct(COC/ATC),the Division recommends that the Permittee solicit manufacturer-certified training,or solicit a qualified contractor or service to regularly inspect and maintain this treatment system.The Permittee is responsible under this COC/ATC to maintain all components of the approved treatment system,designed to meet Surface Water Quality Standards [see attached Operation and Maintenance Agreement]. Compliance duties include: • paying your annual fee[due on the anniversary of COC/ATC effective date], • following the manufacturer's guidelines, • conducting and documenting inspections,in compliance with General Permit NCG550000, • establishing sources for OEM spare parts and supplies, • taking discharge samples for analysis,and logging the results, • making necessary repairs,documenting said maintenance in logs,and • keeping logs onsite for the life of the permit,available for DWR inspection. North Carolina General Statute& 143-215.6B provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation,or certification in any application,record, report,plan,or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this Article; or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case under this Article; or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the Commission implementing this Article,shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000). 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine or imprisonment not more than 5 years,or both,for a similar offense. Application must be accompanied by a check or money order for$60.00 made payable to: NCDEQ • • • • • Mail this application and one copy of the entire package (with check) to: NCDEQ/DWR/NPDES Attention: John Hennessy, Supervisor Compliance and Expedited Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 Attn: John Hennessy Note: Submission of this document insures DWR's consideration, but does not guarantee issuance of a Certificate of Coverage/Authorization to Construct. Page 7 of 7 Revised:A. Orlando NPDES 21Sept2017 4 Attachment B Documentation From Durham County , ROY COOPER Governor - MICHAEL S. REGAN secr•etmry Water Resources LINDA CULPEPPER ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY • — Interim Director October SCE+ V D David&Julie Hunt OCT 6 2018 Hunt Residence (David &Julie) 3007 Redwood Road Durham,NC 27704 Subject: Permit No.WQ0040341 Approval for Pump and Haul of Domestic Wastewater Hunt Residence(David&Julie)-Domestic Wastewater 3007 Redwood Road, Durham, NC 27704 — - Du'rha`fi County ---= -- - - - - - - Dear David &Julie Hunt: The Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office hereby grants approval for the pumping and hauling of domestic wastewater from the Hunt Residence (David &Julie) at 3007 Redwood Road, Durham, NC. Up to 900 gallons per pumping event of domestic wastewater will be stored and then pumped from the on-site storage tank by Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC and hauled to the North Durham Water Reclamation Facility in Durham, NC for • treatment and disposal.This approval shall become voidable unless the agreements between Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC and North Durham Water Reclamation Facility for the hauling and final treatment of the wastewater are in full force and effect.• - This pump and haul permit expires on April 8, 2019. Please note that this temporary pump and haul permit does not in any way imply that the Division of Water Resources will be able to issue a permit for a non-discharge or NPDES discharging wastewater treatment system for the subject single family residence. This temporary pump and haul permit is intended to allow time to work on the system and obtain an on-site septic permit or other type of permanent wastewater treatment and disposal system permit to serve this single family residence:- ' • The pumping and hauling herein described shall be,_performed in accordance with the description, terms, and conditions specified in the application received on October 5, 2018. If there is any modification to the above operation description, please notify this office.immediately. This cover letter shall be considered a part of this approval and is therefore incorporated therein by reference. If you have any questions regarding this approval or require any additional information,please contact Thomas McKinney at(919)791-4233,or me at(919)791-4200. • Sincerel , for Linda Culpepper, Interim Director Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ •by Rick Bolich,Assistant Regional Supervisor • Water Quality Regional Operations Raleigh Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NC DEQ Division of Water Resources,Raleigh Regional Office,Water Quality Operations Section http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps 1628 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1628 Phone:(919)791-4200 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive,Raleigh,NC 27609 Fax:(919)788-7159 • • cc: Scott Pearce,Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC(via:don.bartholf@bartholfengineering.com) Lori Montgomery, Durham Water Management(via: Lori.Montgomery@durhamnc.gov) Larry Wallace, Larry Wallac Construction Services(via: lwallacebuilder@gmail.com) Dur.ba -Couun-fy_Health-Dep meat 2 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO Hunt Residence(David&Julie) Durham County Permit No.WQ0040341 For thEoperation of a domestic wastewater pump and haul activity which will consist of the storage and pumping of up to 900 gallons per pumping event of domestic wastewater and hauling said wastewater to the North Durham Water Reclamation Facility in Durham, NC (NPDES permit # NC0023841), pursuant to your request received October 5,2018. This approval shall become voidable unless the agreements between Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC and North Durham Water Reclamation Facility for the hauling and final treatment of the wastewater are,in full force and effect.This permit is effective on October 8,2018,and expires on April 8,2019. This approval shall be subject to the following specified conditions and limitations: 1. This approval shall become voidable unless the pump and haul activities are carried out in a manner that has been approved by the Division of Water Resources(the Division). 2. This approval is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastewater described in the application dated October 5,2018. 3. The facilities for wastewater storage shall be properly operated, maintained and inspected at all times. 4. An accurate record of the pump and haul activities must be maintained by the Permittee, indicating: a. Date and time wastewater is removed from the facility; b. Name of contract hauler; c. Name of facility receiving wastewater; • d. Volume:of.wastewater removed. • The Permittee shall maintain this log for as long as the pump and haul activities are being conducted and shall be made available to the Division or other permitting authority, upon request. • 5. This approval is not transferable. In the event of sale, name change,ownership transfer or similar activities, a formal request for change must be submitted to the Division. 6. No type of wastewater other than that generated by Hunt Residence (David &Julie)—Domestic Wastewater shall be included in this pump and haul-ectivity. This approval specifically prohibits the inclusion of any industrial wastewater in the pump and haul activity, 7. In the event the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of nuisance conditions, Scotty's Sanitation• Services LLC shall cease operation of all pump and haul activities and take such immediate corrective actions as may be required by this Division. • 8. Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC is liable for any damages caused by a spill or failure of the pump and haul operations carried out within their premises. 9. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water Resources may, upon presentation of credentials,.enter and inspect any property, premises, or place on or related to the pump and haul collection facilities at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with the 3 ./ Division's approval;may inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under the terms and conditions of this approval; and may obtain samples. 10. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this approval may subject Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC to appropriate enforcement actions available to the Division. 11. The granting of this approval does not preclude Scotty's Sanitation Services LLC from complying with any and all statutes,rules,regulations,or ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies(local,state, and federal)that have jurisdiction. Noncompllance_Notification: The Hunt Residence(David&Julie)shall report by telephone to the Raleigh Regional Office,telephone number 919-791-4200, as soon as possible, but in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following: a. Any process unit failure,due to known or unknown reasons,that render the facility incapable of_adequate_wastewater pre-treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators,compressors,etc. b. Any failure of a pumping station, force main, gravity line, etc., resulting in a by-pass directly or indirectlyto receivingwaters without treatment of all or anyportion of the influent to such station or facility. Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall'also file a written report in letter form within fifteen (15)days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur. Permit No.WQ0040341 Approval granted this the 8th day of October 2018. Permit expires on April 8,2019. „„ra • for Linda Culpepper, Interim Director Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ by Rick Bolich,Assistant Regional Supervisor Water Quality Regional Operations Raleigh Regional Office Division of.Water Resources, NC DEQ 4 Durham County Health Department SEPTIC TANK PERMIT No 9213' Area Rural Durham, N. C.,.. Oct, 12, I964.... Owner M. L. Smith Address Location of Property...Redwo o • •i corner of road to M, Lf Smith home . PERMISSION is hereby granted to install a Septic Tank and Secondary Treatment system, to receive wastes from fixtures enumerated on Plumbing Permit No. 9213 in accordance with Chapter 1, Art. C VI, Sections I & 5, Durham County Sanitary Code, at the above location, consistent with existing con- C ditions, as described below: V Septic Tank wide, long, deep (or 900 gal. tank ) Dist. Box 2 outlets. r Nitrification Field lines Ft. long inches wide, laid to proper grade and depth, using n only approved absorbent material. Sand Filter Trench 5'3S50' Other . 0-3 tri NOTE: Installation to be made according to sketch on reverse side; DO NOT cover any part of installa- tion until after final inspection by Health Department. Plumbing by: Adams Plumbing Co. Septic Tank by- 0.-a..,.. .7� - 0. L. Ader, M.D. , M.P.H. , Cil Inspected b <�tr e Date. e '�42.o Director Y ' *r.;;.1-; - Sand fi ter �Frenches are based on '; ��+r sound sanitaryengineering 8' g pram- By W. G. Parrish tices and are widely used; however, should Deputy Director unforeseen developments make it necessary _ to biteir or abandon the system, this Health it.-to i=a{avrisit r. k „ I I I 1 1 0 674- tr,i7 - --( I 1 . •it .ii._ , , . 1111 i k / 41‘ A ,d) A it _ lid 41'' ' lairk-' 40 __1_, _ ill . iriopp I, ilili 1 1 _11 1 1 ' Obi I 011 ill ...1111 II imoppipla nom il I 111/1101 i III II 11il 11 ,91 Hi , _, _ ' ilsrani 1 II -1 IN k illifillf 1111E11 - MIEN _ lin ./.7 i . I il' ii t j Attachment C AWT Soil Evaluation Report �yGp SOIL se, Engineers and Soil Scientists GJ OQIAR F .4 ok Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 4 I'," 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 ! : Apex, North Carolina 27502 •• t' " Jf f�/ 919-859-0669 r " = www.agriwaste.com %q11f August 19, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr.David Hunt FROM: Chris McGee,LSS Gary Morehouse,Associate Soil Scientist SUBJECT: Soils Evaluation for 3007 Redwood Road, Durham,NC. 27704 Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT) was contracted to perform a soils evaluation for the purpose of an on-site wastewater system suitability at the subject property in Durham, NC. The evaluation was performed by Gary Morehouse of AWT on August 14, 2019. A single-family residence with a non-state permitted sand filter discharge wastewater system is located at 3007 Redwood Road. The existing system is crossing over a neighboring property to discharge. The soils on the subject property is unsuitable for subsurface and surface application wastewater systems due to lack of suitable topography, limited space, shallow wetness conditions, and shallow depth to expansive clay mineralogy. Therefore, the property does not comply with the requirements of 15A NCAC 18A Section .1900 — Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems -or- 15A NCAC 02T Section .0600 — SFR Wastewater Irrigation Systems. The site is a likely candidate for a surface water discharge system. Please contact us with any questions,concerns, or comments. Sincerely, Civi. /14-1,-- Christopher McGee,LSS a r q . '' ''' ' ''''' ' N\CIIII:"),,,,,,,,t0A . .., -ii,4214:-';','";;;;Ii,i''."..- 4, ':'''' , '''. '---\":)(1:'-‘1"'*'*''' { J rik i , ' b A Yd 1 "Illb444H:::. Yh 'IC\ : ,ig.: t 0 , ''.:;', 8 ) C ". *' , jti* N N &,., o�. 4 ! J . , r w _.,: ... '44.1,41.'", 1.0::,:, X' 3 1ti1 t44 3r1 • t � s z ice 50\NELI ` ` SEThAGK a w. ' � i 'AO : /'�' '1 y•.. , "G !off y 1 ' .A .y „w � H * ; i, ;. �v //'dry Po " R nM ' \ \ 4 s ,y is �� 4 J is P 0 30' 60' SCALED FOR 8,5'X11' SHEET Attachment D 1. Correspondence from USGS 2. Stream Classification • 5/6/2020 Agriwaste Technology,Inc.Mail-FW:USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther C... b-\\ Kristy Green <kgreen©agriwaste.com> Engineers and Soil Scientists FW: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request # 2020-54 (dated 2020/03/04) for UT Panther Creek Durham County...RE: Low-flow request approval 1 message Kevin Davidson <kdavidson@agriwaste.com> Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:40 AM To: Kristy Green<kgreen@agriwaste.com> From: Weaver,John C <jcweaver@usgs.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 1:33 PM To:jdavidson@agriwaste.com Cc: Grzyb, Julie<julie.grzyb@ncdenr.gov>; Hill, David A<david.hill@ncdenr.gov>; adugna.kebede@ncdenr.gov; Albertin, Klaus P<klaus.albertin@ncdenr.gov>; Kevin D. Davidson <Kdavidson@agriw Davidson <Kdavidson@agriwaste.com>;Weaver,John C<jcweaver@usgs.gov> Subject: USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther Creek Durham County...RE: Low-flow request approval RESEND with adjusted SUBJECT LINE for future search and reference, as needed and appropriate. JCWeaver J.Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE Email:jcweaver@usgs.gov USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online:https://www.usgs.gov/centers/sa-water North Carolina-South Carolina-Georgia 3916 Sunset Ridge Road . Raleigh,NC 27607 Phone:(919)571-4043 // Fax:(919)571-4041 From:Weaver,John C<jcweaver@usgs.gov> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 12:44 PM To:jdavidson@agriwaste.com https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=75462b5a03&view=pt&search=all&permth id=thread-f%3A1665948723928993345&si mpl=msg-f%3A16659487239... 1/5 5/6/2020 Agriwaste Technology,Inc.Mail-FW:USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther C... Cc: Grzyb,Julie<julie.grzyb@ncdenr.gov>; Hill, David A<david.hill@ncdenr.gov>; adugna.kebede@ncdenr.gov; Albertin, Klaus P<klaus.albertin@ncdenr.gov>; Kevin D. Davidson <Kdavidson@agriw Davidson <Kdavidson@agriwaste.com>;Weaver, John C<jcweaver@usgs.gov> Subject: Re: Low-flow request approval Ms. Davidson, In response to your inquiry about the 7Q10 low-flow characteristic for a "roadside ditch" to an unnamed tributary within the Panther Creek basin near Glen Forest (vicinity of Durham) in east central Durham County, the following information is provided: A check of the low-flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh office) does not indicate a previous low-flow determination for the point of interest, identified by the lat/long coordinates (36.03326, -78.80028) provided via email dated 03/04/2020 from the DWR USGS Low Flow portal following your request submission. No USGS discharge records are likewise known to exist for the point of interest. In the absence of site-specific discharge records sufficient for a low-flow analysis, estimates of low- flow characteristics at ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low-flow yields (expressed as flow per square mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates have been determined. A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina (https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (StreamStats adjusted coordinates 36.03324, -78.80028 NAD83) is 0.03 sqmi. For streams in east central Durham County, low-flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the following reports: (1) The first is a basin-wide report for the Neuse River basin published in 1998. It is USGS Water- Resources Investigations Report 98-4135, "Low-flow characteristics and discharge profiles for selected streams in the Neuse River basin, North Carolina" (Weaver, 1998). The report is available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/1998/4135/report.pdf. This report provides low-flow characteristics (based on data through 1996)for USGS continuous- and partial-record sites in the Neuse River basin where sufficient data was available for analyses. However, the report does not provide statistical relations for estimating low-flow characteristics at ungaged locations. (2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2015-5001, "Low-flow characteristics and flow-duration statistics for selected USGS https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=75462b5a03&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1665948723928993345&sim pl=msg-f%3A16659487239... 2/5 I , 5/6/2020 Agriwaste Technology,Inc.Mail-FW:USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther C... continuous-record streamgaging stations in North Carolina through 2012" (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The report provides updated low- flow characteristics and flow-duration statistics for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where a minimum of 10 climatic years discharge records were available for flow analyses. Low-flow characteristics estimated for point of interest: Visual inspection of the stream location on a topographical map suggests a very small basin area upstream from the point of interest. As noted above, the drainage-area for the basin upstream from the point of interest is 0.03 sqmi. On pages 33-34 of the Neuse basin-wide low-flow report (first reference above) is information about the Occurrence of Zero or Minimal 7Q10 Discharge that is likely to occur for a stream within the major basin, contingent on the size of the upstream drainage basin. The discussion on page 33 in this section indicates that poorly drained soils (that is, soils having low infiltration rates) is a primary factor in numerous occurrences of zero 7Q10 discharges in the upper end of the study area [Neuse River basin]: "Much of the water that comes in contact with the soils in this area most likely enters the streams as overland runoff and does not infiltrate into surficial aquifers for later release during drought conditions. Among sites having zero 7Q10 discharges, the drainage areas range from less than 0.01 mi2 (site 10) to about 44 mi2 (site 121). For sites in this area having non-zero 7Q10 discharges, the average 7Q10 unit low flow is about 0.005 (ft3/s)/mi2. Therefore, sites with drainage areas less than about 10 mi2 could be expected to have zero or minimal 7Q10 discharges (less than 0.05 ft3/s)." Additionally, the basin upstream from the point of interest is underlain by the Triassic basin geologic unit. From a hydrologic perspective, streams underlain by this geologic unit have very little to no potentials for sustained base flows during extended dry periods. At sites underlain by the Triassic basin where the USGS has collected sufficient records for low-flow analyses, the low- flow characteristics for sites having drainageareas that would typically be expected to have sustained flows actually have some of the lowest low-flow estimates in the state. Consideration of the above information results in a conclusion the 7Q10 discharge for the point of interest is zero flow. Please understand the information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered provisional, subject to revision pending further analyses. This low-flow response is provided via the DWR USGS Low Flows cooperative agreement between the USGS and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water hops://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=75462b5a03&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1665948723928993345&sim pl=msg-f%3A16659487239... 3/5 5/6/2020 Agriwaste Technology,Inc.Mail-FW:USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther C... Resources. Hope this information is helpful. Thank you. Curtis Weaver J.Curtis Weaver,Hydrologist, PE Email:jcweaver@usgs.gov USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online:https://www.usgs.gov/centers/sa-water North Carolina-South Carolina-Georgia 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Raleigh,NC 27607 Phone:(919)571-4043 // Fax:(919)571-4041 From:Albertin, Klaus P<klaus.albertin@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 11:05 AM To:jdavidson@agriwaste.com<jdavidson@agriwaste.com>;jdavidson@agriwaste.com <jdavidson@agriwaste.com> Cc:Albertin, Klaus P<klaus.albertin@ncdenr.gov>; Grzyb, Julie<julie.grzyb@ncdenr.gov>; Hill, David A <david.hill@ncdenr.gov>; adugna.kebede@ncdenr.gov<adugna.kebede@ncdenr.gov>; Weaver, John C <jcweaver@usgs.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Low-flow request approval Your request has been approved and will be forwarded to USGS.A response from USGS usually takes 7- 10 business days. Request Flow Statistic Approval Request ID: 55 Requestor: Julie Davidson Requestor e-mail:jdavidson@agriwaste.com Requestor Phone: 919-367-6315 Local Government: Public Water Supply: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=75462b5a03&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1665948723928993345&simpl=msg-f%3A16659487239... 4/5 5/6/2020 Agriwaste Technology,Inc.Mail-FW:USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request#2020-54(dated 2020/03/04)for UT Panther C... Consultant:Agriwaste Technology Contact: Julie Davidson Reason: Permit River/Stream: Pond Drainage Area (sq. mi.): 0.65 Latitude: 36.101 Longitude: -78.903 Other Information:A ditch that leads to a pond that is located at the lat/long entered above.Attachment is included with an aerial map and streamstat report Statististics: ["7Q10"] Approved by:Albertin, Klaus P https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1?ik=75462b5a038<view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1665948723928993345&simpl=msg-f%3A16659487239... 5/5 3/3/2020 StreamStats 7Q10 Flow Request - Hunt Region ID: NC Workspace ID: NC20200303145341243000 Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 36.03326, -78.80028 Time: 2020-03-03 09:54:06 -0500 7/7- / _7A rr' c ``5t 4 r.7r°,94 I .set' Mr.Weaver,Can you provide a 7Q10 flow for a road side ditch that flows into an unnamed tributary that flows into Panther Creek?Thank You,Julie Davidson https://streamstats.usgs.gmiss/ 1/3 3/3/2020 StreamStets Basin Characteristics Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 0.0311 square miles PCTREG1 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 1 100 percent PCTREG2 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 2 0 percent PCTREG3 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 3 0 percent PCTREG4 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 4 0 percent PCTREG5 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 5 0 percent LCO6IMP Percentage of impervious area determined from NLCD 2006 impervious dataset 2.62 percent Peak-Flow Statistics Parameters[Regioni Piedmont rural under 1 sgmi20145030] Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit DRNAREA Drainage Area square miles 0.1 1 En tee, LCO6IMP Percent Impervious NLCD2006 2.62 percent 0 47.9 Peak-Flow Statistics Disclaimers[Region1 Piedmont rural under 1 sgmi20145030] One or more of the parameters is outside the suggested range. Estimates were extrapolated with unknown errors Peak-Flow Statistics Flow Report “[Region Piedmont rural under sgmi20145030] Statistic Value Unit 2 Year Peak Flood 15.1 ft^3/s Idli.A://strearnstats.usgs.gmiss/ 2/3 3/3/2020 StreamStats Statistic Value Unit 5 Year Peak Flood 23.5 ft^3/s 10 Year Peak Flood 29.2 ft^3/s 25 Year Peak Flood 36.3 ft^3/s 50 Year Peak Flood 41 .6 ft^3/s 100 Year Peak Flood 46.9 ft^3/s 200 Year Peak Flood 52 ft^3/s 500 Year Peak Flood 61.5 ft^3/s Peak-Flow Statistics Citations Feaster, T.D., Gotvald, A.J., and Weaver, J.C.,2014, Methods for estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods for urban and small, rural streams in Georgia, South Carolina, and North Carolina, 2011 (ver. 1.1, March 2014): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014-5030, 104 p. (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2014/5030/) USGS Data Disclaimer:Unless otherwise stated,all data,metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected.Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey(USGS),no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes,nor on all computer systems,nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. USGS Software Disclaimer:This software has been approved for release by the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS).Although the software has been subjected to rigorous review,the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty,expressed or implied,is made by the USGS or the U.S.Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore,the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S.Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use. USGS Product Names Disclaimer:Any use of trade,firm,or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.Government. Application Version:4.3.11 https://streamstats.usgs.go'Iss/ 3/3 g NC Surface Water Classifications cr,,k a stnexer lot more inkrrmation NC Classifications Website ..........1 N.../.... 1 'Ur ':':7 Redwood Rd Durnar x Q.II tea.-zil-ecu ts---3007 it ,Ea ga lit /fIlLc-'1°'; . 0 ,-- / 1 . iimmiiimmim„- Surface Water Classifications: Penner Creek' [ : 1 Dec,ct or Fon,source to a colts 1 1 ra*downstream of Durham County SR 1818 ,.. C ass f cat c, WS-NNW! Geste o July 31 1998 C.as's &hat cues More ink It::Sil Neuse ••,,, _ __ ... • 40111111111 : + Pr * 1-----7)04, • -78 81336637 Devoe* "V:1 =MI ,''Car, Cs,-,:,D."r....,,..'nf,fr Z—li^, e Cc.,t, S:e:e:,,',:,"th ce,C ,S DCT Es HERE 35,— , Attachment E 1. Flow Path to"Blue Line"Water Feature Current Flow Path i J \\S----\\''- --- \\\,0 '://:,.,,,, aI 1 /1:2/ —11 ovi c'' * __ , // Murmur /�! -- — �t , �. I j, ilk, %. \ N. /r. \ 1 , ,� C , , \ / / - yap /6:;:eX",......„.......................j \ pqr tool,fir,A\ A\ \ 4-0 ) il J 1 ,....„ (74 it / ` 1 ,- — -r Bragg fttl----li---1 1IS //- .............„............./11 } / -....7....„...< / ---'1;41Z,4;'-:';,-', '--I-- <- r 4`&1'- I. 5I //4. r-------"--„,...„.„ N ,,,,rj I I I W i�+ E May 7,2020 1:4,514 o 0.0375 0.075 0.15 mi I . . ' . ' r ti i r , ` I 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km Sources:Esd,HERE.Gamin,USGS,Intermap,INCREMENT P,NRCan,Esri Japan,METI,Esd Chna(Hong Kong),Esri Korea,Esri(Thailand),NGCC,(c) GpenStreolMap contributors,and the GIS User Community 2020 New Flow Path �l Y ff _ I if r� {{ r + f/ f p \.i•r �'` \ / r - ' � ) MarR r --- \ </ \ " ./ / i /' - Y \ � . ra .- f----T-- ti l J^�l♦ { t.--...::: .,.....4,..4.../ t (?,)t t4A.4.,.fti in• {4 \ f 67 ,, /---, ,/ „, \ iN).1.,,, / / J rf f j r' \ -ti �f// \ \ 7 -*---'\. A.,--n : .-4 / . r 4 / / / / r I. ---":::::Z.."''''",- //:,‹ ''''''"N /I --''''''N.,,,,.."''''''.--,„„...„, 'l '`,....,"/ / N., ,,,,,,2 ' ------.....Th '--,...............,, if r------_,„ N W I `:. / 1lr'-'''''' ,,,. /1/ May 7, 2020 1:4,514 0 0.0375 0.075 0.15 mi I r • • , ' t ' 1 ? l • I 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km Sources:Esn,HERE,Garmin,USGS,!Merman INCREMENT P,NRCan,Esri Japan,METI,Earl Chha(Hong Kong),Esn Korea,Esri(Thailand),NGCC,(c) OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community Attachment F Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System I ! Kristy Green <kgreen@agriwaste.com> Engineers and Soil Scientists Sewer Availability Request 2 messages Kristy Green <kgreen@agriwaste.com> Eri, May 1, 2020 at 2:17 PM To:jeff.lecky@durhamnc.gov Hi Mr. Lecky, I hope you are having a great Friday! I have a sewer availability request for the address of 3007 Redwood Road, Durham, NC 27704. Can you please let me know the approximate distance to the nearest sewer location, as well as if there are any plans for sewer line expansion towards the property in the next 5 years? If there is someone else I should contact about this matter,just let me know.Thank you so much for your time! If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out. Best, Kristy Green Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT) Office: (919)859-0669/Direct: (919)629-6403 501 N Salem Street,Suite 203 Apex,NC 27502 kgreen@agriwaste.com PWEngSery<PWEngServ@durhamnc.gov> Fri, May 1, 2020 at 4:47 PM To: "kgreen@agriwaste.com"<kgreen@agriwaste.com> Good afternoon Kristy, City sewer is not available to 3007 Redwood Rd.The closest existing sewer lines (green lines in the image below) lie roughly 2,800 ft. away near the corner of Cheek Rd. and Ardsley Dr. As of this date,there are no plans to extend sewer towards 3007 Redwood that our office is aware of. €1, P o a . \ • . �„ <4 \ / \ \ i 0 Parcel (1) r1 t 3007 REDWOOD RD • \ \ i I l„ Ii \ 1 ‘ \ \ \ il • r 1 \ I \ i ir �. •'.°. ♦s•- S ! '♦ Let me know if you have any questions. Stay well, From: Lecky,Jeff<Jeff.Lecky@durhamnc.gov> Sent: Friday, May 1,2020 7:12 PM To: PWEngSery<PWEngServ@durhamnc.gov> Subject: FW:Sewer Availability Request Engineering Services, If this email attached is something that you do not respond to normally please let me know who to forward it to or I will be glad to provide a snap shot of the utilities in the area. Thanks. Jeff [Quoted text hidden] Attachment G Engineering Alternatives Analysis &, Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, North Carolina 27502 919-859-0669 www.agriwaste.com Engineering Alternatives Analysis Hunt Property 3007 Redwood Road Durham, NC 27704 Durham County ( ,,,,,, ' ti CAP i' ��. F l y' 024502 lk .5//34/‘1 7 ej Date: May 8, 2020 Design Engineer: Kevin D. Davidson,P.E. Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex,NC 27502 Office: 919-859-0669 Direct: 919-747-2306 Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document North Carolina Division of Water Resources STEP 1. Determine if the proposed discharge will be allowed Non-municipal applicants. Due to staff constraints, the NPDES Unit cannot prepare speculative limits for non-municipal applicants. Thus, it is your responsibility to make your own determination as to whether the proposed discharge might be allowed by the Division, by evaluating the water quality factors listed above. It is highly recommended that you discuss the proposed discharge with the applicable DWR Regional Office and/or NPDES Unit staff, who may be able to provide input on the likelihood of a new/expanding discharge. As a first step,you must obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed discharge location to ensure that the receiving stream is not subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data (specifically, drainage area, the summer and winter 7Q10, average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in Raleigh at 919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with the EAA, and will be used by the permit writer to develop permit limits. You must also verify that the proposed action (i.e., construction of a wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or subdivision ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review Form (Attachment A), and include the signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package. Response: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 flow estimate for the downstream tributary of the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed discharge point is in a roadside ditch off of Mannix Road. Effluent leads north east in the ditch and empties into a tributary to Panther Creek. The analysis from USGS indicates the 7Q10 discharge for the point in question is likely zero (Attachment D of application package). All applicants. If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the EAA preparation by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project: • Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in phases, provide a schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see STEP 2). Response: A wastewater discharge system is to be constructed for a 3-Bedroom Single Family Residence (SFR) located in Durham County, North Carolina. The proposed system will replace an unpermitted sand filter discharge system that currently serves the residence. The proposed discharge point is in a roadside ditch located off the property to the northeast, which leads to an unnamed tributary to Panther Creek. The proposed treatment system will utilize the following components: - New Septic Tank with Effluent Filter AdvanTex AX-20 RT Pod Recirculation Pump Chamber(Integrated into AdvanTex Pod System) - UV Disinfection Discharge Point with Rip-Rap Construction of the proposed system will occur in a single phase with an anticipated completion time of approximately 2 weeks after the start of construction activity. EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 1 of 8 Applicant Information: Name: David Hunt Mailing Address: 3007 Redwood Road Durham,NC 27704 Phone Number: 919-323-7185 Contact Person: David Hunt Facility Information: Name: Hunt Property Address: 3007 Redwood Road Durham,NC 27704 County: Durham Phone Number: 919-323-7185 Contact Person: David Hunt EAA Preparer's Information: Name: Kevin Davidson,P.E. Mailing Address: Agri-Waste Technology,Inc. 501 N. Salem Street Apex,NC 27502 Phone Number: 919-859-0669 Contact Person: Kevin Davidson,P.E. STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flow Residential Population Projections. Facilities requesting an NPDES discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges must document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC State Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on the Internet at http://www.demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year population projections for specific areas are not available, a linear extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation from a linear projection method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future annexations, include a proposed annexation schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be met. Response: Because the wastewater treatment system is designed for a single-family residence, the population to be served will be limited by the number of bedrooms at the individual residence. The existing house contains 3 bedrooms. For the 20-year planning period,the system will be designed for a 3-bedroom residence with a flow of 360 gallons per day. At 2 people per bedroom,the system will be designed to serve 6 residents. STEP 3. Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System. You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a municipality or other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non-Discharge Permit. All connection options should include an evaluation of a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s). 1. Existing Sewerage System: (a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five-mile radius,or consider a greater radius if cost effective for the project size. Response: Connection to a sewer collection system is not feasible for this facility. Engineering Services of the Durham Public Works Department indicated that the property is not within the city's coverage area. The closest current EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 2 of 8 city-maintained sewer is approximately 2,800 linear ft. from the property and there are no immediate plans for a sewer extension to the area at this time(Attachment F). For reference,if an installation cost of$100/ft of installed sewer line was assumed, the cost to connect this property to the sewer line would be approximately $280,000. Additional costs including the cost of the pump station, potential "tap"or sewer capital fees, road repair costs, frontage fees and fees for right of way permits would also be incurred by the homeowner. (b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance from existing municipal or private WWTPs under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept the wastewater, include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative technologically infeasible. Response: N/A No sewerage available (c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the piping/pumps/resources necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant. Attach a topographic map or a site drawing showing the physical route of this alternative. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. Response: N/A No sewerage available 2. Planned Sewerage System: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is projected to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If applicable, determine availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate authority. Response: As stated above,the City of Durham's sewerage system currently exists within five miles of the property,but a connection to this system is infeasible due to the cost. According to the Durham Public Works Department,there are no known plans to bring the city sewer system closer to the applicant's property. Alternative B. Land Application. Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip irrigation,and spray irrigation. 1. Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from a soil evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic loading rate and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system,including buffers. Response: Per the soil evaluation by Chris McGee of Agri-Waste Technology,Inc.the site does not have adequate space or suitable soil to accommodate a ground absorption or surface drip or surface spray wastewater system (Attachment C of application package). Regardless of the fact that a subsurface ground absorption can not be designed or permitted for this site, the potential size of a subsurface system has been estimated. According to the county soil survey, the site is classified as a White Store series soil. For a subsurface system in this soil,a drip system with pretreatment would be required. This White Store soil is a sandy loam soil that would have a long-term acceptance rate (LTAR) ranging from 0.05-0.2 gpd/sq.ft., with a typical rate of 0.1 gpd/sq.ft. Subsurface systems also require the drainline to be installed with the contour so that each drainline is at a constant elevation. This results in a "fanning"of the drainline and requires additional space in order to install the required amount of drainline. The sizing calculation is summarized in the table below: EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 3 of 8 Subsurface Dripfield Design Alternative #Bedrooms 3 Daily Flow 360 gpd =120 gpd*#bedrooms LTAR 0.1 gpd/sqft Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 3,600 sqft =Daily Flow/LTAR Estimation for Topographical Variation 1,200 sqft Estimated Area Required (Actual) 4,800 sqft Approximate Area Available 4,329 sqft The current property's land available for the system is 4,329 sq.ft.,due to setbacks and existing site conditions. This area also considers maintaining a 50' well setback. A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A of the EAA. The land needed for a subsurface dripfield design is a minimum of 4,800 sq. ft., so there is not sufficient space for this type of design at this residence. The potential size of a non-discharge surface application system has also been estimated. According to the county soil survey,the site is classified as a White Store soil. For a surface system in this soil,the SFR loading rate group is likely restricted to a maximum annual loading of 15 in/year. The sizing calculation for a non- discharge surface system is summarized in the table below: Non-Discharge Surface Design Alternative #Bedrooms 3 Daily Flow 360 gpd =120 gpd:#bedrooms Surface Loading Rate 15 in/year Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 14,053 sqft Approximate Area Available 3,336 sqft The current property's land available for a surface drip or spray system is 3,336 sq. ft., due to setbacks and existing site conditions.A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A.The land needed for a non-discharge application system is estimated at 14,053 sq. ft., so there is insufficient space at this residence. The potential waving of property setbacks was taken into account when considering the available application area for both surface systems. 2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary land can be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices. Alternatively,provide documentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in the project area (include letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling property). Response: Because insufficient land is available onsite, offsite land was reviewed. The table below lists neighboring properties and the value of the land as listed by the Durham County GIS website. The values listed in the table do not reflect the value of the single-family residences. The soil type listed for these properties is White Store. These sites will be very restrictive for wastewater systems. EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 4 of 8 • Adjoining Property Values Neighboring Property Area(ac) Vacant Price of Land (S) PIN 0853-04-90-1392 (East) 0.30 Y 4.886 PIN 0853-04-90-3396(West) 0.46 N 21,870 PIN 0853-04-90-2476 (Northwest) 0.46 N 21,960 3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non-discharge application system. Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing structures,proposed structures,and other uses within the site. Response: A typical subsurface drip system or a non-discharge surface spray or surface drip system with pretreatment considers the following components: -Septic Tank with Effluent Filter -Recirculation Tank(Integrated in AX20-RT unit) -AdvanTex Treatment Pod(AX20-RT unit) -Pump Tank(potentially integrated in AX20-RT unit) -UV Disinfection(Integrated in AX20-RT unit) -Headworks Box -Control Panel -Disposal Field(drip or spray) Note:The proposed discharge system does not consider the pump tank,headworks box or disposal field. Site drawings of these alternative systems showing the available application area are included as Appendix A of the EAA. Due to the size requirements of a drip or spray system and the limited available space,there is no ability to consider any of these systems on this property. 4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party. Response: There is no reuse plan being considered either on-site or by a third party. The existing residential plumbing infrastructure does not allow for reuse in the existing residence. It is not feasible to consider using reclaimed water on the site or becoming a bulk distributor of reclaimed water. The table below summarizes the amount of reclaimed water that could be beneficially used on site. As shown, there is insufficient area to utilize the daily flow of reclaimed water. On-site Utilization of Reclaimed Water Daily flow through system 360 gpd Available Area to Irrigate 5,558 sqft *Veg.cover on property Application Rate 0.5 in/week *Fescue Grass Acceptable Volume to Irrigate 232 ft3/week 247 gpd 5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the potential revenue generated by selling the water. Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis is included as Appendix B of the EAA. An analysis was performed for a sub- surface drip system, a non-discharge surface application system, and a reclaimed water system. A summary of the analysis is included in STEP 4. EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 5 of 8 P 6. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and conclusions. Response: Calculations performed to evaluate land application alternatives are shown above in Alternative B,Points 1 and 4. 7. Note:The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2T.0500 or 15A NCAC 18A.1900. Response: The treatment systems specified above in Step B would meet the treatment standards required by these rules as they pertain to single family residences. However, because of the lack of available space and other restrictions listed above,no land-based systems can be considered. 8. Note: Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systems must evaluate the potential for an infiltration gallery treatment alternative. Response: N/A Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse. You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently reusing wastewater within the confines of their WWTP property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing, etc., while other municipalities have established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse applications might include golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation, grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land Application. The design of reclaimed water systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2U. Response: All reuse applications for this project scale were evaluated under Alternative B,Point 4. Wastewater reuse was determined to be infeasible for this project. Alternative D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters. 1. No new or expanding (additional) discharge of oxygen-consuming waste will be allowed to surface waters of North Carolina if both the summer 7Q10 and 30Q2 streamflows are estimated to be zero,in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206(d). Private applicants must contact the USGS in Raleigh at 919-571-4000 and obtain (generally for a nominal fee), the receiving streamflow data (s7Q10, 30Q2, annual average streamflow) at the proposed discharge location. This information must be included in the EAA,and will be used to develop permit limits. Response: Because this is an existing treatment facility with estimated zero flow at the discharge point and no expansion in discharge proposed,the discharge will be considered on a case-by-case basis. 2. All direct discharge systems of oxygen-consuming wastes should be evaluated both with tertiary filtration [BOD5= 5 mg/1, NH3-N= 1 mg/11 and without, and assuming a weekly sampling regime. Response: Tertiary filtration is not required under the general permit, as the general permit requirements (monthly average) are BOD5 = 30 mg/1 and Total Suspended Solids = 30 mg/l. However, based on actual sample results from similar treatment systems(other facilities using the same technology)in many cases,a BOD5 of 5 mg/1 and NH3-N of 1 mg/I can be met. While weekly sampling of the treated effluent would confirm the treatment results on a regular basis, the additional cost associated with the collection and testing of the effluent would not be feasible for the homeowner. EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 6 of 8 3. Provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities, including a schematic diagram of the major components and a site plan of the treatment facility with outfall line(s). Response: A flow schematic is included as Attachment I(of application package). 4. Provide documentation of the availability of required land and/or easement agreements. Response: The proposed discharge system will be located on land owned by the applicant,but an easement agreement will be required to access the roadside ditch where the system will discharge. The land that must be crossed is owned by a relative. 5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis for the discharge system is included in Appendix B. A summary of the analysis is included in STEP 4. 6. Note: All direct discharge treatment systems must comply with Reliability Requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0124. Response: The system serves a private facility that is served by a well and does not have elevated water storage tanks. In the event of a power outage,water will not be available to the residence. There is storage available in the system to hold some waste from the house until power is restored to the system. If excessive amounts of wastewater are generated,the wastewater will back up in the house. Alternative E. Combination of Alternatives. You should evaluate the possibility of a combination of wastewater alternatives that would minimize or eliminate a direct discharge alternative. For example, consider whether the facility can operate a land application system during the dry season when streamflows are at their lowest and provide less dilution, and operate an NPDES discharge system during the wet season when soils may not be as amenable to land application and the receiving stream provides its greatest dilution. Response: A non-discharge alternative is not feasible due to the space and soil constraints listed in Alternative B. The presence or absence of a seasonal high water table will not relieve the other constraints. EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 7 of 8 STEP 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives PVCA Summary Table. The EAA must include a Summary Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all technologically feasible wastewater alternatives. The summary should include a breakdown of capital costs and recurring costs. In some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for some alternatives, or possibly collect actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative. Ultimately, the final determination on cost effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts. Response: The following table presents the cost analysis for several types of wastewater systems. Given the information presented above,the only technologically feasible alternative is the Discharge System. The"Install Cost" includes the estimated cost to design and install the specific type of system. The"Present Value of Costs"is based on a discount factor of 1.2%. Cost Analysis for Three(3)Bedroom SFR Present Install 20 yr Total Cost Value Cost Annual Cost 20 years of Costs System Type (S) (S) (S) ($) Sub-Surface System $37,000 $24.534 $61,534 $58,482 Non-Discharge System $48,850 $21,444 $70,294 $67.631 Reclaimed System $52.150 $23.753 $75.903 $72.959 Discharge System $24.250 $17.417 $41.667 $39.495 EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 8 of 8 Appendix A. Site Maps For System Alternatives Analysis - Subsurface System Option - Non-Discharge System Option - Reclaimed Water Option y.. .. . 4 ' N nel So Scientlyta Apo,Nom Corot..275, 919-859-0689 P:rk l."- ^. Hunt Residence •. , t •t". ikt yo, tht Surface Otsehanr - V - Wastewater Treatment System , - if M• v—rweit— E • OW , .., : .,... • „.L'I Otneer leionryabom Dm!Hunt 3007 Wooed Road Duthegn,NC 27704 . . ! . 019)323-7185 I , , , Property Wormhole . t 41' 3007 Weald Rood * Durham,NC 27704 • ... aphyrn Cotry,NC '-1.- N SW 0853-04-90-3219 ''• . ftiti4t. (7 I- .._ , . e' • s 41. t 4, , ` ' ' • It; 1 '-'` P° '..„ - 41 PFERESSML DICKER S&L I ' • . .,,,, ' ':' r...s.r.s•Ak" t". • ''.• ' • - ,..' thw ,,-- •'.4:-' i e•e..''•• 0. .., .` _." FOR , • ,,, ‘ , , _ UNRESTRICTED REVIEW - - - -, - .-' AREA ONLY . (outside setbacks) - , .., . • • • _ ' , . . — '- •tZ"#-` ''D 4 - - • • , ...._ •••. „„ _ AREA = 4,329 sqft. _ y MY ISM ME OECI191011 .... - . • . . , ----r..-- , W - _ -• .„..,,b. _ f' 4N ....,,e, 47, .. ‘i `-' ,.- ,,, ,-, - 6 ' ~ 1 ii-.-. ,..„._ - 40/e 0. SEES'ME , .... - S . . * . Alternative Design: • -- lk. Subsurface System , g_ 9" , —*-- . ' rE, ORM ift CREPRED Pt .° ' * ; 'r•ite. 4-- K.Gm 5/7/2120 ,..., , REVISED Be REARED St -, -". . r , .... - . 0 30' RaE/SED EM KOZO Oft IP .."•. , i i- * CRUM MEER • .. A . SCALED FOR 11'XI7' SHEET SE-1 AV�rr - �" Enpinwn antl iNl 9CMMItb I # x -- 50,H. se�ai s�ro.z�a E it - . Npe Norm CS O,a 27502 .:." p'nete mm r 9 , . Hunt Residence � r i.'.___' Mbe afa a rme6 e e sy.c«e ~. f ••'IG_: Ows Delia HlnlMnl I � PH/0E63-04-90-3219 ��� . P'°`iom rhea + ♦ III 4 � i47, A aka FOR _ UNRESTRICTED REVIEW (outside Rs setbacks) ONLY U ►���������������� AREA = 3,336 sgft. z. d. eA®DE DOOM! i R ,� ,r _- . F, ^O e Q *' 7 '�Tk SHEET 777,E ---,, \ : Non—Discharge Systems • Alternative Design: e S st • �/V ,e. 87111), t O .p`S owMx sr: cr�>Fn an: ` t ..c y` ? c cq. an�2azo �16Ea er: �Y®an: li - J r 0 30' er a _ HEIFASED ar. seD oE. owc EEaER 4< ,x - SCALED FOR 11'X17' SHEET SE-2 nd Scrortistr ice Enemas" ms"' :. • SOi N.Salem Street.Suee 2p3 Ape;NaM Gm. 2)fi02 -41 91H8fi9-06fi9 pmnatecam r :. efr Hunt Residence „' -:- . * i :% `: Discherge Wastewater Surfa System cNix Informatlen: OM Hunt e Durham.NO 27704 (919)773-71e5 zr ''4•��♦••♦♦♦�♦�� .Y ` 4.. 1.. prparty 7RA Feda Woman,flood a.naa.xc roe r �♦♦♦�♦ 301 wNo�absu re ♦����1 • 41 , FOR '- `'. ,'-. ,•. .,..ea UNRESTRICTED REVIEW AREA ONLY (outside setbacks) 4,4 AREA = 5,558 sqft. r --PE IOWa — n 4 -,s-_, s I r..t �F 1. - - SHEET 7111E s: G M, Ntemative Design: Reclaimed Water ._ ® — _ - -y. N.- - f. v - DRAWN BY: CREAlED Ott " e �, Q /A. REVISED Eft awn a: 0 ay �, � SCALED FOR 11 X17• SHEET WISER Ern an: in DRAWINGGSE-3 Appendix B. Present Value Cost Analysis For System Alternatives Analysis - Subsurface System Option - Non-Discharge System Option - Reclaimed Water Option - Surface Discharge Option Engineering Alternatives Analysis PVCA Calculation Cost Analysis for Three(3)Bedroom SFR Present Install 20 yr Total Cost Value Cost Annual Cost 20 years of Costs System Type ($) ($) ($) ($) Sub-Surface System $37,000 $24,534 $61,534 $58,482 Non-Discharge System $48,850 $21,444 $70,294 $67,631 Reclaimed System $52,150 $23,753 $75,903 $72,959 Discharge System $24,250 $17,417 $41,667 $39,495 Sub-Surface System Co $37,000 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System r 1.200% PV = Co + E C' ,_, (1 + r)' PV 1$58,482 'Present Value of Costs Cost Summary Table Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost C, Total Ct PV Increase 5%every 3 Increase 3%yearly Increase$50 every 5 Increase 3%yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value years years Costs($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs($) ($) Costs($) 1 60 500 258 0 125 943 932 932 37,932 2 60 500 266 0 129 954 932 1,864 38,864 3 60 500 274 0 133 966 932 2,796 39,796 4 60 525 282 0 137 1,004 957 3,753 40,753 5 60 525 290 300 141 1,316 1,240 4,993 41,993 6 60 525 299 0 145 1,029 958 5,951 42,951 7 60 551 308 0 149 1,069 983 6,934 43,934 8 60 551 317 0 154 1,082 984 7,917 44,917 9 60 551 327 0 158 1,096 985 8,902 45,902 10 60 579 337 350 163 1,489 1,321 10,223 47,223 11 60 579 347 0 168 1,154 1,012 11,235 48,235 12 60 579 357 0 173 1,169 1,013 12,248 49,248 13 60 608 368 0 178 1,214 1,039 13,288 50,288 14 60 608 379 0 184 1,230 1,041 14,329 51,329 15 60 608 390 400 189 1,647 1,377 15,706 52,706 16 60 638 402 0 195 1,295 1,070 16,776 53,776 17 60 638 414 0 201 1,313 1,072 17,848 54,848 18 60 638 426 0 207 1,331 1,074 18,921 55,921 19 60 670 439 0 213 1,382 1,102 20,023 57,023 20 60 670 452 450 219 1,852 1,459 21,482 58,482 24,534 Non-Discharge System Co $48,850 Estimated Cost to Design and Install System r 1.200% PV = Co + E C' =t (1 + r)' PV L$67,631 'Present Value of Costs Cost Summary Table Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost Ct Total Ct PV Increase 5%every 3 Increase 3%yearly Increase$50 every 5 Increase 3%yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value years years Costs($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs($) ($) Costs($) 1 60 500 143 0 125 828 818 818 49,668 2 60 500 147 0 129 836 816 1,635 50,485 3 60 500 152 0 133 844 815 2,449 51,299 4 60 525 156 0 137 878 837 3,286 52,136 5 60 525 161 300 141 1,187 1,118 4,404 53,254 6 60 525 166 0 145 896 834 5,238 54,088 7 60 551 171 0 149 931 857 6,095 54,945 8 60 551 176 0 154 941 855 6,950 55,800 9 60 551 181 0 158 951 854 7,804 56,654 10 60 579 187 350 163 1,338 1,188 8,992 57,842 11 60 579 192 0 168 999 876 9,868 58,718 12 60 579 198 0 173 1,010 875 10,743 59,593 13 60 608 204 0 178 1,050 899 11,642 60,492 14 60 608 210 0 184 1,061 898 12,540 61,390 15 60 608 216 400 189 1,473 1,232 13,772 62,622 16 60 638 223 0 195 1,116 922 14,694 63,544 17 60 638 229 0 201 1,128 921 15,615 64,465 18 60 638 236 0 207 1,141 921 16,535 65,385 19 60 670 243 0 213 1,186 946 17,481 66,331 20 60 670 251 450 219 1,650 1,300 18,781 67,631 21,444 ESL'EZ 696'ZL 608'0Z SOb'L PBL'L 6LZ 0SP LSZ 409 09 0Z 17S9'LL 404'61. £50'l 0Z£'l ELZ 0 En 409 09 61. Z05'0L Z9£'8L 4Z0'L 69Z'L LOZ 0 9EZ 99L 09 8L 9LP'69 8Z£'LL 5Z0'L 95Z'L LOZ 0 6ZZ 99L 09 LL E94'99 £0£'9L LZ0'L EZZ'l 96L 0 £ZZ 99L 09 9L 5Z4'L9 5LZ'9L EEC'L 969'l 68L 004 9LZ 6ZL 09 SL Z60'99 Z46'EL L00'L £81.'l 48L 0 0LZ 6ZL 09 41. L60'99 1.176'ZL £00'L LLL'L 8LL 0 P0Z 6ZL 09 £L 980'49 8E6'LL SL6 9ZL'L EL 0 86L S69 09 ZL ZLl'E9 Z96'0L 8L6 SLL'L 89L 0 Z6L 569 09 LL 9£L'Z9 996'6 L6Z'L 494'L £9L 09E L8L 969 09 Ol 448'09 1769'9 ES6 L90'L 89L 0 L8L Z99 09 6 L68'6S L4L'L 9S6 L90'L VSL 0 9LL Z99 09 8 9£6'8S 99L'9 856 Z40'l 6P1 0 LLL Z99 09 L 9L6'LS 9Z8'9 ZE6 L00'L S1L 0 99L 0£9 09 9 940'LS 969'4 LLZ'L Z6Z'L LPL 00E L9L 0E9 09 S 6Z9'99 6L9'E LE6 £86 L£L 0 99L 0£9 09 4 Z69'49 Z4L'Z LL6 446 CC 0 Z9L 009 09 £ L96'ES L£8'L 4L6 9E6 6ZL 0 LPL 009 09 Z L90'£S LL6 LL6 8Z6 SZL 0 £PL 009 09 L ($)slsoo (s) ($)s3so3 io pelunoosld lsoo pelunoosla ($)slsoo sieeA sieeA anleA luesaid lelol lenuuy pe.unoul lenuuy /leaA%S eseenul g',Jana pg$aseaoul AIJee,(%C aseanul S tiane%g eseenul Ad 33 le301 la woo 3ueweoeldaa An ;soa buldwnd 3so3 aldwes eaj suoµe.iedp eej lenuuy Jeej algel tiewwns 3so3 slsoa;o enleA lues8Jd I 686'ZL$I Ad a +I 7=, T 3 + °3 _ Ad %OOZ'L J welsW(g Ilelsul pue u61saa of lsoa pelewllsa 05L'Z9$ °a wa;sAs pawieloali 0)CO CD O)CO U)CD OD N. CD(0 CDM 0 N. U)N U) O) 0)co 1` U)M N N N OO CO N CO O) ip CO 10 c),-tO tO d ,-CO U)U)N 0)CD CO M V.-CO CO M d >>,..-1 d Ui tO OD oD 6 66 N N M d N 66 h 6Oi a 8N N N N N N N N M CI 0)CD Cy)el OD M M OD M OD aN o U 3 w O fO— O)M U)OO CO n co co M s"M O 0(N U ma)O)d co N O CO fO h �O) 0 M st O~ JIN co UN W UNN 0)OOM - atf0 MN .- .-N M d d Ui fO 1` r to o)O•-•-Nc''dO F. O .) U O OD N Qw gm d a O rd O OO OO N p O W N CDO NM MN M NN (O 0)CD CD CD CD CD OO 1,- N- •N-1-1,-N a O N r N 1` O d O CO M 1` 1--co CO N N M N O Ni d 1 -S U)0 r O)O d U)U)- 0)O M N O d 'Ea" co co OO co--r 1` 1` 1` h co co co W m r Q cU W O U >.c d m r E M U)CI)M N- U)0) CO M CO y 0)U) 1-VI 0) 0 N N CD CD d d d U)COOO U)CD CD f- 1-oo Co 0)0 0 Am N N N N 2m L.. c. „= a^= 1a E E o y 0 I,W -.'' O CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 CD o CD CD CD O CD CD CD7 o aUr. OD 'Pg.' E U 7 , a In - ts £ m to N C O m C N (0 O)VD N- O U)0)'I' mt. U)O CO N CO.00 jylO N N N CO OD d NI' U) U)U)COOO CD N.- NCO 0)0)O O 6 of N N N OT W %) 4 (n U o co 0 0 o 0 o m" O coLL m 0 1 m N V Y > G LO @ 0 0 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CD CD O O O U) U)U)r tO f0)0O (O V + E N M M M M M M M M M Cr d d d d d V'V'•P d d E n co 8 w a 0 = — co coe�_7u U. pO VV O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Or) aE + Off) co fO c0 CO CO tO(O CO CD CD CD CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO E N 8 d c c w .- U CD 4' Q U, m II Es'c el m N CD d OO CO N.CO 0)O'-N M d CO h aD 0) 0 > N 0 o 0 .. 0., a Attachment H Local Government Review Forms Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, North Carolina 27502 919-859-0669 www.agriwaste.com May 8,2020 Mr. Thomas J.Bonfield City Manager City of Durham 101 City Hall Plaza Durham,North Carolina 27701 RE: Local Government Review Form Application for Discharge System—Hunt Residence 3007 Redwood Road,Durham,NC 27704 Dear Mr. Bonfield Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system. The proposed system will be permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit for Single Family Residences. The proposed system will serve an existing 3-Bedroom Single Family residence (SFR) located in Durham County, North Carolina. The proposed system will replace the unpermitted discharge system that currently serves the residence. NC DEQ has issued many Pump and Haul permits for the property. That indicates that the sand filter system that is currently at the property is under performing. It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the General Discharge is the only technology and economical feasible option for this residence. Will you please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed system. This residence is located in Durham County and is located in the Durham City limits. Please note that this form is only meant to determine zoning/jurisdiction information, and does not indicate your approval of the proposed system. I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669. Best Regards, Kevin Davidson,P.E. V.P. of Engineering _ r.. Hunt Residence 3007 Redwood Road Durham,NC 27704 Attachment A. Local Government Review Form General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the issuance of NPDES Permits for non-municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental Management Commission(EMC)may not act on an application for a new non-municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect)whether the proposed facility is consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State. Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility,the applicant shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must: • Submit a copy of the permit application(with a written request for this form to be completed)to the clerk of the city and the county by certified mail,return receipt requested. • If either(or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form,as evidenced by the postmark on the certified mail card(s),within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail,the applicant may submit the application to the NPDES Unit. • As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days,the applicant shall submit a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s)failed to respond within the 15-day period. Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized. Name of local government City of Durham (City/County) Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located? Yes[ ] No[ ] If no,please sign this form,have it notarized,and return it to the applicant. Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes[ ] No[ ] If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect,is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Signature (City Manager/County Manager) State of ,County of On this day of , ,personally appeared before me,the said name to me known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing document and he(or she)acknowledged that he(or she)executed the same and being duly sworn by me,made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true. My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary Public) Notary Public(Official Seal) EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 9 of 8 Hunt Property \; Manhtx Rd- -� 4 • ,, _ __, \ 3 13 1\ - ..--------- . ( • ?6 3 , i \! , 3037 11 il ', i 0' \ s-/.--/(\\. illr c---- ' \-- / ....-„ / N }SSG . �,� ►!!L' / I ( _I \ F 4SI:r2 t' f / ,..--.._. \ 131_,..._ 41 Y( 11 4 F,17 r t,.... ., 1 1 �/ , 4: i , , ,_...... ---_______________, a+ i \ 5, \\ 302 1 / . • r "a / J r (I r d71n �7,2 ,r,17 / Q` 1 i A/ , mfr �r . J bra 49 Rd /4709 c P i _ ;)Jg, -I":'1' / -11',14 / .*---"-- `' 31101 l f ,d!i� / / C - W �) E j /�r 1 ,,U`,/ May 7,2020 1:2,257 0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 mi I 5 % ti , ' , 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 km Sources:Esri,HERE,Gamin, USGS,Intermap,INCREMENT P,NRCan,Esri Japan,METI,Esri Chha(Hong Kong),Esri Korea,Esri(Thailand),NGCC,(c) OpenStreelMap contributors,and the GIS User Community 2020 Engineers and Soil Scientists Agri-Waste Technology, Inc. 501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, North Carolina 27502 919-859-0669 www.agriwaste.com May 8,2020 Mr. Wendell Davis County Manager Durham County 200 East Main Street Durham,North Carolina 27701 RE: Local Government Review Form Application for Discharge System—Hunt Residence 3007 Redwood Road,Durham,NC 27704 Dear Mr. Davis, Enclosed please fmd a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system. The proposed system will be permitted under the NCG550000 General Discharge Permit for Single Family Residences. The proposed system will serve an existing 3-Bedroom Single Family residence (SFR) located in Durham County, North Carolina. The proposed system will replace the unpermitted discharge system that currently serves the residence. NC DEQ has issued many Pump and Haul permits for the property. That indicates that the sand filter system that is currently at the property is under performing. It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the General Discharge is the only technology and economical feasible option for this residence. Will you please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed system. This residence is located in Durham County and is located in the Durham City limits. Please note that this form is only meant to determine zoning/jurisdiction information, and does not indicate your approval of the proposed system. I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669. Best Regards, Kevin Davidson,P.E. V.P. of Engineering I Hunt Residence 3007 Redwood Road Durham, NC 27704 Attachment A. Local Government Review Form General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the issuance of NPDES Permits for non-municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental Management Commission(EMC)may not act on an application for a new non-municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect)whether the proposed facility is consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State. Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility,the applicant shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must: • Submit a copy of the permit application(with a written request for this form to be completed)to the Berk of the city and the county by certified mail,return receipt requested. • If either(or both)local governments) fail(s) to mail the completed form,as evidenced by the postmark on the certified mail card(s),within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail,the applicant may submit the application to the NPDES Unit. • As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days,the applicant shall submit a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local governments)failed to respond within the 15-day period. Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized. Name of local government Durham County (City/County) Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located? Yes[ ] No[ ] If no,please sign this form,have it notarized,and return it to the applicant. Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes[ ] No[ ] If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect,is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes[ ] No[ ] Date Signature (City Manager/County Manager) State of ,County of On this day of , ,personally appeared before me,the said name to me known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing document and he(or she)acknowledged that he(or she)executed the same and being duly sworn by me,made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true. My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary Public) Notary Public(Official Seal) EAA Guidance Document Revision:April 2014 Page 9 of 8 Hunt Property \ ^` WI anti'x Rd /`` • /// \\\ 4b., \ , ,.. i .. -1,'`.1:. ' . ---'.ir.'-''''''''''''."--') - ---, .t. -'-'-4. -\:(-' + .3 037 /r • I,.;i, liUl �r. ) \ I // i ltr>1 , ; — j ; / ,: l \' /: / # i - !I4 i 1 t \ , 4517 rr+ r scrag f� -_________________, ,,:,. r / 302 1 \/ ,.., tri;r. �1712 _f __ _ _'..›.' I\\"1/ i \ - AP LJ r f� lq//7r),, / `� ( r / / ,.--„.-:-. . f i / ,;1 1°- i 1 / Sl W I'..,, E May 7,2020 1:2,257 0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 mi 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 km Sources:Esri,HERE,Garmin, USGS,Intern p,INCREMENT P,NRCan,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China(Hong Kong),Esri Korea,Esri(Thailand),NGCC,(c) OpenStreeWMapcontributors,and the GIS User Community 2020 Attachment I Process Flow Schematic G '= Inlet Tee w/Ball Valve -Effluent � Filter From To House VT Septic �'^�/— AdvanTex �► Discharge ► Point Tank AX-RT UV �- -�- Eff,pc _ _ Return Line