19930044 All Versions_Complete File_20100726

mid
W+M
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR
SECRETARY
January 5, 1999
Ms. Cyndi Bell
N.C. Department of Environment
And Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Ms. Bell:
?t
JAN 7 W
L WETLANDS GRO P,
i;l ER U4Ll '
Subject: 1998 Annual Monitoring Report for Bridge 121 on SR 1406 (B-2158)
Mitigation Site, Onslow County
Please find attached the 1998 annual monitoring report for the B-2158 Mitigation Site.
In January 1999, a representative of the Planning and Environmental Branch will contact
the recipients of each report to set up a meeting between NCDOT and resource agency
personnel. This meeting should facilitate a discussion of all the 1998 annual monitoring
reports.
If you have any questions, please contact Phil Harris, P.E., Natural Systems Unit Head, at
[phone]. Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.
Sincerely,
,i, L 4&
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.,
Assistant Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Phil Harris, PE, Natural Systems Unit Head
David Franklin, USACOE
1

1 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 19J8

I?

j

7
7
E
BB-2158
Mitigation Site
Ons._ .. County
TIP #B-2158
VIP
Prepared By,
Natural Systeme Uri
Planning and Environmental Branch
With Carolina Department of Transportation
December 1996
1

i

'C

L

C?
C
C
C

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background
Located in Onslow County, the site is north of Little Northeast Creek on SR 1406
near Bridge No. 121 (Figure 1). The site is approximately 0.9 acres and includes
0.66 acres of restoration and 0.24 acres of creation.
1.2 Purpose
This report details the vegetation monitoring during 1998 at the B-2158 Mitigation
Site. No hydrologic monitoring was required on this site.
1.3 Project History
December 1994 Site planted
October 1996 Vegetation Monitoring (1 yr.)
August 1997 Vegetation Monitoring (2 yr)
August 1998 Vegetation Monitoring (3 yr.)
1

J

I

I?

F

w
?; b n ~
Illu
?VFF ` C €
m
r?
?y `a{ PINEWOOD 9h Q
oQ °
+R' 4 2 COUNTRY RD
N
!_ !y? SSR 1423 55.
?`v m ti1N ;(Tr0, S?vgm? _
y. sy? ? e?R CORN y.
110 ,
di -r-ZL
V Zi
qo B-2158 Mitigation
' - Site - - so
Litt,
100P Rq hum -
CUNNING -R
U J_. _ 7 t
JERRY I' .3 `BLRNE•T7E Z0
' _ _ fff?= 5 9o JpER RD ff yti?o
w? ora 0? m
' 24 ,f .1ST... _,• %\ 3 -u
Q0yfw
Sit,
-
01,
-? _ r:..n?r, ' _4 ? -C' •.''-;..• • Cif '' fw ?{ ?;, tl, i m
51,
way
o
Ro`y` S oWjik-Am ' E
24
Ij
£? aP
j
FIGURE 1
Piney Green fY-
' DetAre Stdusn 24 isT SITE LOCATION MAP

0

11

u

' 2.0 VEGETATION
' 2.1 Success Criteria
Success Criteria states that there must be a minimum mean density of 320 trees
' per acre of approved target species surviving for at least three consecutive
years.
'
2.2 Description of Species
' Th
f
ll
i
t
i
e
o
ow
ng
ree spec
es were replanted in the Wetland Restoration Area:

' Nyssa sylvatica, Black Gum
Qu
r
l
t
O
O
k
e
cus
yra
a,
vercup
a
Taxodium distichum, Bald Cypress
Quercus michauxii, Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus nigra, Water Oak

2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring (3 year)

No monitoring plots were established; however, by vise -' rhservation it is
revealed that there is greater than 320 trees per acre. There are also some
' volunteer Wax Myrtle, Black Willow, and a few Sweetgum.
The site was supplemental planted in March of 1998. Site looks good with most
' trees growing well. Site continues to be used as a fishing area. There is a foot
path through the center of the site from the edge of pavement to the creek. "No
Trespassing" signs were installed in winter of 1998 and are currently still in place.

2.4 Conclusions
' By visual observation we were able to determine the average density to be
greater than 320 trees per acre and therefore above the minimum requirement.
1

t

n

1

C

' 3.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
' Due to the replanting activities which took place on the site, vegetation
monitoring will continue in 1999.

n

0

J

i

E
0

1
0
I

J

I??

7
L
Ll

n
0
0

H
[7
0
H

APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOS

E

?J

u
0
0

n
0
u

0
? B-2158
t

7
t
u
J

I
n

0

C
t

L

u
0

J

L
I
C
C

APPENDIX B
i MONITORING PARTNERING MEETING MINUTES

C
0
C
C

n

C
L
?I
i
r

5

?J

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
December 4, 1998
Dr. G. Wayne Wright, Chief
Regulatory Branch
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402
E. NOR.RIS TOLSON
SECRETARY
1 Dear Wayne:

H
r

0
I I

Re: NCDOT/Resource Agency Partnering Meeting - Monitoring Guidelines
A meeting was held on July 22, 1998 in the NCDOT Photogrammetry Conference
- Roorr__ in-Raleigh to. discuss. monitoring guidelines for the 1998 Annual Monitoring
Reports. Please find attached a list of those in attendance and the meeting agenda.
Following introductions, Charles Bruton described the purpose of the meeting and
opened the floor to David Franklin for any opening comments. David said he looked
forward to resolving any previous discrepancies in the 1997 Annual Monitoring Reports
and discussing ways to better present monitoring results in this year's monitoring reports.
Phil Harris moderated the meeting.
HYDROLOGIC MONITORING
NCDOT and the Corps agreed wetland mitigation sites must meet the guideline
for hydrology (1987 Manual) using consecutive days and not cumulative days of the
locally designated growing season. Wetland hydrology criteria in the 1987 Manual notes
that a site must be seasonally inundated or saturated (within 12 inches of the surface)
greater than 12.5 percent of the local growing season. NCDOT will re-evaluate the 1997
monitoring data to reflect consecutive days rather than cumulative days of the growing
season.
Regarding monitoring well data, David wants to see compliance is met and that
the sites are working. Phil noted that NCDOT is taking a close look at recurring
problems associated with monitoring well installation and maintenance. In cases where
hydrology was failing for a particular site, NCDOT would be unable to remediate the site
until the following year due to seasonal constraints and the necessity to collect specific
hydrographic information. In discussing what was considered to be hydrologic success,
? e
F

J

n
n

I I
L
H
7

C
d

n

H

11
David Franklin said the 1987 Manual was the official guideline. However, he went on to
suggest that the Corps would be interested to see a more detailed breakdown of the well
data and would not be opposed to hydrologic success based on a longer monitoring
period with less than a 12.5 % success criteria. He also mentioned well data that falls
below the 12 inch threshold may also be examined as a special case. Mike Bell suggested
site remediation should occur now rather than waiting until December. NCDOT, in
coordination with the Corps, will identify unsuccessful sites and work together to
determine how the site is failing and the best remediation techniques to implement.
VEGETATION MONITORING ISSUES
Due to NCDOT's demand for hardwood seedlings there is a shortage of seedlings
this vear and there was none available for remediation efforts. There is a minimum one
year lead time for ordering seedlings. In a situation on a site where the well data is good
but the vegetation is not successful the Corps stated they would review it on a site by site
basis. In cases of remediation, Charles said it was almost impossible to grade and plant a
site before the winter deadline.
Randy Wise requested an extension of the August/September time period to
obtain the vegetation monitoring data for the sites. After discussing this issue, it was
agreed that the marsh sites would be evaluated in August and the hardwood sites could be
evaluated as late as October and November before leaf drop. The NCDOT will send a
"blanket" letter to the Corps to modify all permits to reflect the revised vegetation
monitoring period. Phil mentioned that although there would be an extension of the
' monitoring period for vegetation, monitoring reports would continue to be completed and
distributed by the end of December. Randy said they often perform random site visits
throughout the year to see how vegetation is performing and would perform supplemental
' planting if noted early enough in the growing season.
' Ken Jolly asked who was responsible for downloading wells and did they look at
vegetation. Beth Smyre said the Geotechnical Unit downloaded well data and notified
her of any vegetation issues. The Corps requested that proposed remediation for
' hydrology and vegetation be included in monitoring reports. NCDOT and the Corps will
coordinate any remediation measures. Randy expressed their commitment to remediate
vegetation as soon as possible.

C i

The discussion turned toward planted versus volunteer species. The Corps does
not want to see volunteer species included in survival rate calculations for planted
species. Randy noted the survival rate is set at 50% or higher. David wanted to make
sure that the sites meet the target species requirement in stems per acre, not a percentage
(except for older sites set up for percentage). David also wanted to see the distribution of
species planted and volunteer. Randy said it is often difficult to identify certain species
during the first two years (several oak species often look alike as saplings). Generally it
is easier to differentiate the species by the third year. The Corps wanted to know if there
was a way to identify the planted species at planting. However, the planting procedure is

0

I

0

u

I

r
so labor intensive now it would make it impossible to do so. The 50 foot by 50 foot
monitoring plots are chosen and staked in the field after planting has occurred. The
Corps wants NCDOT to note the unwanted volunteer species and to identify possible
remediation to make sure these species do not dominate the site. The NCDOT and the
Corps agreed that the distribution of species is such that no species dominates more than
20 % of the distribution. Red maple and sweet gum are generally not to be planted to
insure good numbers of target species.
HYDROLOGIC SUCCESS CRITERIA
The incorporation of reference systems in determining success was discussed.
David concluded that if a particular site failed under the 1987 Manual guidelines, then
NCDOT had the option of comparing site parameters to reference site parameters in
determining success. The purpose of reference systems was to allow NCDOT a second
option in achieving success. The determination of a reference system with its success
criteria would need to be addressed in the mitigation plan. The use of the
hydrogeomorphic system (HGM) was also discussed. The Corps is not going to use
HGM as a reference system. but will probably look at it as a tool. There are no guidelines
out yet on HGM.
The use of 20-80 versus 30-70 probability graphs, as defined by WETS, was
discussed. These graphs compare the specific year rain data to the historical data for the
mitigation site area. The NRCS and WETS use the 30-70 probability graphs and
NCDOT would like to use these as well. It was decided to use the 30-70 information and
to go to the nearest gage station as long as the source was cited. David determined that if
a site's hydrology performs at 12.5%, then hydrologic success has been achieved. If a
site performs in the 5% to 12.5% range, then there is "marginal" hydrologic success. If
this trend continues, then the entire success criteria for the site will be reviewed.
The target percentage for hydrological success should be included in the permit
and shown in the mitigation plan. The Corps will be willing to negotiate on the success
of the site, but include adequate information in the permit and the mitigation plan.
L

Charles Bruton suggested placing monitoring wells in the impacted wetland areas
to assess and compare to mitigation areas. David wanted to insure that the best
mitigation site attainable is created. David also asked that well performance be broken
out in the report.
An interim report was given on Mud Creek. It was noted that wells placed in the
reference wetland and wells placed in the created wetland were an inappropriate method
to determine hydrologic success because the difference in soil type, hydrology, and cover
type.
Mike Bell discussed results of a workshop he attended on monitoring wells. He
also discussed the use of piezometers.

0

fl
0

4
There was no further discussion and the meeting adjourned. Please advise if you
have any questions regarding the meeting, minutes, or agenda.
Sincerely,
4y
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.
Assistant Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
VCB/el
Attachments
LI
i?

j

I I

1

July 23, 1998-9:30 Q Century Center in Photographic Conference Room
NCDOT/Resource Agency Partnering Meeting to Discuss Monitoring issues
AGENDA
Introductions
Purpose & Goals of Meeting
Standardize the monitoring. reports
flvcb•ologic Monitoring
Consecutive vs. Cumulative days
Data interpretation
Vegetation Ifonltoring Issues
I'lanted vs. Voluntary plants
Monitoring timetrame
Success Llriteria
Geographical considerations
Reierence systems
monitoring Report Presentation
Text
Figures io be included
Tables
Photographs
Submittal dates

r
J

n

0

r
u
1

C
11

1
,v?iL??/ R CV 1 - A?-CLZNC", 1 ?,?NZ7 'A'G T!
1
t4 VA E-
v - ? 11 (,x-3c?
t
I NGDOT - Pa- 6-C9 733 ? X4
P(?..,Q 3-rav ? 5
1141 Q,?.i.?i ? Pt r ?9/g? ?33 - ??'yyX 3e 9
rI r ?t?-? 16.I x
~'!a'
7
-T
_?-
41
,.' ,(;'CDC; - -p t C C?14) l3s- x
J
f
I 'Y
1 Q?
ti G t7? r 7:4 E [?.
73 3 -
c? .rlt orn
1 1-4C,907- - 2Fu 733
?f?NDy ?R?FF i? (,
1
1

n
n

L

r.

0
1

C
r

H

n
0

0
1

7
7

1
0
0
30
Z66 t TOO
llN3d aM -li1 ]M _.....? /?
85GZ-9 GOt?09ZZ8 ?1??('Ob iii.. ,.. ,.? ?..?? .F •? ?????? ?,ZI?I?I_
l
J.1N(10o MO-ISNO
SJ,VMHJIH d0 NOISIAI a .0 .N
NoliVibOdSNV"1 dO
-1 o
C?%- lsoayo-1ON
?-- o1-Y
/lD
I 1 tiff/ +, r,)C!. c crS? X01
l e \ r -
_ I l \? ? i Ste, ?• .
O n
.
" ' d.w 5U7F°
err a.n`
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT. JR. SAM HUNT
GovERNOR DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS SECRETARY
P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C 27611-5201
January 25, 1993
MEMORANDUM TO: Don Morton, P.E.
Highway Design Branc
FROM: B.J. O'Quinn, P.E.
Planning & Environmen 1 B anch
SUBJECT: Onslow County, SR 1406, Bridge No. 121 over
Little Northeast Creek, State Project No.
8.2260401, TIP No. B-2158.
The Environmental Unit has been discussing a piece of
land in County with the regulatory agencies for use as
a mitigation site to offset losses associated with the
subject project. Specifically, this property is adjacent to
the project limits approximately east of the existing
centerline at station 65+50. The tract is bounded to the
west by NCDOT right of way from Station 65+50 to the crossing
of Little Northeast Creek, to the north by a line running-
perpendicular from the centerline at Station 65+50 to the
bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south and east by
Little Northeast Creek.
Mr. Faison .Lewis, Division 3 right of way agent has
discussed the possibility of purchasing the property with the
landowner, who has indicated a willingness to sell the
property. We are hereby recommending that you direct the
Right-of-Way Branch to purchase this property.
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any
questions, please contact Doug Huggett at 733-9770.
cc: Mr. Faison Lewis, Division 3 Right of Way agent

4 ,
n?
sTA7r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
i
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
January 19, 1993
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
225 N. McDowell Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
ATTENTION: Mr. John Parker
L
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Onslow County, SR 1406, Bridge No. 121 over
Little Northeast Creek, State Project No.
8.2260401, TIP No. B-2158.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is
proposing to replace Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast
Creek on SR 1406 near the city of Jacksonville in Onslow
County. This proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130 feet long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway. The power and telephone lines running east
of the proposed roadway will be relocated to the west side of
the roadway, and will utilize the water and sewer line right
of way.
Due to high traffic volumes (9,600 VPD) and the lack of
suitable off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained
on-site during the construction period by providing a
temporary detour on the east side of the existing alignment
(see sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). The temporary crossing of
Little Northeast Creek will be accomplished by utilizing four
temporary 84" corrugated steel pipes (see sheets 5 of 11 and
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer

9 of 11).
Due to filling associated with the shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
cleared roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the
temporary detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66
acres of bottomland hardwood wetland habitat. The temporary
detour embankment will be removed following completion of
construction, and the disturbed area restored. This
restoration effort is outlined in the enclosed mitigation
plan summary. Additionally, two small upland areas exist
within the boundaries of the detour (see sheets 4 of 11 and 5
of 11). These upland sites are both approximately 0.04 acres
in size. Following completion of construction, these two
areas will be graded to wetland elevation and planted with
wetland species as outlined in mitigation planting plan,
resulting in 0.08 acres of created wetland habitat.
A temporary construction easement has been obtained to
allow for the temporary detour. The boundaries of this
easement fall slightly outside the temporary construction
footprint. However, it is not anticipated that any clearing
or filling will take place outside of the construction
footprint shown on the drawings. If, during construction, it
is determined that any additional area needs to be cleared,.
NCDOT will inform the various permitting agencies and will
also include this area in our restoration efforts.
During an on-site permit agency coordination meeting
held on December 11, 1992, N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
personnel requested that NCDOT investigate purchasing a small
piece of land just outside of the project limits for use in
further mitigating for temporary and permanent habitat
losses. This parcel of land is approximately 120 feet east
of the existing centerline at station 65+50. The landowner
has indicated a willingness to sell this property, and NCDOT
is presently negotiating to purchase the property. The
mitigation site is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x
70' in size. This area is bounded on three sides by a
bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain this
mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase the
tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation and plant wetland species in accordance
with the enclosed planting plan. Successful implementation
of NCDOT's mitigation plan at this site will lead to the
creation of 0.16 acres of wetland habitat, as well as the
preservation of approximately 0.80 acres of an existing `.
bottomland hardwood system.
NCDOT is requesting that the proposed work be authorized
under the appropriate Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
permit. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting
issuance of a.401 Water Quality Certification from the N.C.
Division of Environmental Management. The U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers has previously authorized this project under
Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23 (Categorical Exclusions).
Included for your information is a permit application, permit
drawings (11 pages) and a mitigation plan. A processing fee
of $250 will be forwarded to your office within the next
week. We would also like to request that copies of any
environmental agency comments supplied to your office during
the review of this application be forwarded to NCDOT. If we
may be of further assistance, or if you require any
additional information, please contact Mr. Doug Huggett of
NCDOT's Environmental Unit at [phone].
Sincerely,
B.J,. 'Quin P.E.
Ass`i ant--Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Mr. Charles Jones, DCM-Morehead City
District Engineer, COE
Mr. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR (7 copies)
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental
Mr. D.J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
Mitigation Summary w
Onslow County, SR 1406
..Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130 feet long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway.
Due to high traffic volumes and the lack of suitable
off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained on-site
during the construction period by providing a temporary
detour on the east side of the existing alignment. The
temporary crossing of Little Northeast Creek will be
accomplished by utilizing four temporary 84" corrugated steel
pipes.
IMPACTS
Due to filling associated with the shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the temporary
detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66 acres of
bottomland hardwood wetland habitat.
MITIGATION
The temporary detour embankment will be removed
following completion of construction, and the disturbed area
restored to its original elevation. Additionally, two small
upland areas exist within the boundaries of the detour (see
sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). These two upland sites total
approximately 0.08 acres in size. Following completion of
construction, these two areas will also be graded to wetland
elevation (approximate elevation 4.51).

NCDOT will also purchase a parcel of land approximately
120 feet east of the existing centerline at station 65+50.
This area is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x 70',
or 0.16 acres in size. This area is bounded on three sides
by a bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain
this mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase
the tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation.
After grading of the sites are completed, wetland tree
species such as overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), water oak (Quercus nigra), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica) and bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted.on 8 to 10 foot centers to
compensate for project related wetland impacts. NCDOT proposes to
plant five of the listed species. Species compositions will be
approximately equal. If less than five species are available at
the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with environmental agency
personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. MCDOT will
attempt to obtain one year old seedlings (12-18" tall) with 1/4"
minimum root collar diameter. If possible, all seedlings will be
obtained from suppliers at approximately the same longitude as the
planting site.
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
As proposed, the project will lead to a temporary impact to
0.66 acres of wetland habitat, and the permanent loss of 0.13
acres of wetland -h-abi tai.. _ -Succes-sful implementation of NCDOT' s
mitigation proposal will lead to the restoration of 0.66 acres of
wetland habitat, and the creation of 0.24 acres of wetland habitat
(two 0.04 acre sites within temporary detour route, one 0.16 acre
site just outside of project limits).
The restored and created wetland systems north of Little
Northeast Creek will be in NCDOT permanent right of way, and will
therefore be protected from future development. The restored and
created wetland systems south of Little Northeast Creek do not
occur in permanent'NCDOT right of way. However, due to the
exceedingly wet nature of this area, it is unlikely that any
development would obtain the permit authorization required for any
development.
4
Adjacent Property Owners
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
Mr. Cecil Morton
910 Elaine Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Mr. Tommy Morton Jr.
Route 2, Box 500
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Mary Venters
Route 2, Box 467
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Belinda Stephens
611 Linwood Avenue
Durham, NC 27708
Ms. Evelyn White
Route 2, Box 503
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 14 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
Both
c. Will the project be for community, private, or y_
a. Name NC Dept. of Transportation commercial use?
Attn: B.J.._0'Quinn, Asst. Branch Mgr. Public
Address Pn RnY Pspni
CityRaleigh State NC -
Zi 27611 Day phone [phone]
X Landowner or __ Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) SR 1406 Bridge over
Little_N.E. Creek. B-2158
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
d. Describe the planned use of the project.
Public Transportation
4 LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract +/- 1.5 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED 4' NGS 1929
PROJECT d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
M
Muc
ee, Marvyn, Goldsboro, Baymead
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1406 e. Vegetation on tract Forested Wetlands
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Piney Green f. Man-made features now on tract Roadway and Bridge
c. County Onslow g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
d.. Is proposed work within city limits or planning the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
jurisdiction? No X
Conservation Transitional
e. Name of body of water nearest project Developed Community
Little Northeast Creek Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE Not Zoned
OF PROPOSED PROJECT L How are adjacent waters classified?
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for j, Has a professional archaeological survey been
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Replace existing bridge and carried out for the tract? No If so, by whom?
widen and realign approach road
3/'91
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development. '
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structuresproposedOne brigde w/ approaches,
one temporary detour
b. Number of lots or parcels
N/A
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.) N/A
d. Size of area to be raded or disturbed
00S acre
e.
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? NO
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
No net increase after removal of temporary
e our
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
asphalt and concrete
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management? N/A
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water trewrit facilities.
j. Have these faci it ees received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
N/A
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down"). surface runoff
in. Water supply source N/A
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach acc sways or provide new access. _
N/A
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? N/A
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(ML.W) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below Temm
MHW Temp.
Upland fill
areas
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards 0 CY
Length.- Width Depth.
+/- 470' +/- 12.
+/ - 700' +/ - 45'
c. Type ofmaterial N/A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swampss , oor other wetlands?
e. High ground excavation, in cubic yards
1E0 CY behind existing endbents
2 3/91
f. Ditlnen?ioons of soil dirspeosal area
up an ispo a a a not yet determined
g. Location of spoil disposal area upland site not
yet determined
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? unknown
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 montihs, in
feet c N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards tbe placed below
mean high water /A
f. Type of fill material N/A
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? unknown
If so, where? 8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland, In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
swamps, or water areAb? ing items must be submitted:
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
water? Yes instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 384 CY (temp detour) the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
in. Type of fill material select fill deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
n. Source of fill material suitable borrow site the project.
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? yes An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled er. (Refer to Coastal Resources
1/2 x 11 white pa
470' avg x 12.5' avg perm. ; 700' avg x 45' avg p
ule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Commission Rule-
(temp)
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
and erosion controlled?
Standard NCDOT erosion adn sedimentation only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
control measures prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
r. What type of construction equipment will be used use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? backhoe, bulldozer
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment the like.
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts. A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A that opportunity.
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level N.1 A
3/91 3
Name
Address
Name
Address
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. if the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the day of J -A JJ d 19_7 3
X
or A?thonzep agent
4 3/91
SUMMARY
..........................................
..........................................

>'
....................................

FILL BELOW
NORMAL WSE

FILL IN
WETLAND

TOTAL FILL IN
WETLANDS

FILL IN
WETLANDS
TEMP. DETOUR 348 CY 4487 CY 4835 CY 0.66 AC
-L- REV. 0 CY 360 CY 360 CY 0.13 AC
TOTAL 348 CY 4847 CY 5195 CY 0.79 AC
IN
N°
0

59?
Northeast
_ vv
0 l?

(
1
? 7
r-

J 1L,?
tr

1 ?
I

VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1 MILE
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET i OF ii . OCT. 1992
:: I A,
a-
N
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project 8.2260401
Federal-Aid Project BRM-5725(2)
B-2158
Bridge No. 121 is included in the Federal-Aid Bridge
Program... The location is shown in Figure 1. No substantial
impacts are anticipated. The project has been classified
"categorical exclusion".
I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
1
.4
Replacement
environmental
as a Federal
Bridge No. 121 should be replaced at its existing location as shown
by Alternate 2A in Figure 2-2.
The recommended structure consists-of a bridge 140 feet long and
34 feet wide. Approximately 1900 feet of approach roadway work is
necessary to shift the centerline of the roadway to the east. This minor
adjustment to the roadway alignment is needed to maintain adequate
clearance during the construction period between the structure and the
major utility lines which parallel the roadway on the west side. The grade
of the new structure should be approximately the same as the existing
grade. The design speed is about 50 MPH:
Traffic will be ma.intained on-site during the construction period by
providing a temporary detour on the east side of the existing structure.
The estimated cost, based on current prices, is $ 873,000. -
The estimated cost of the project, as shown in the 1992-1998
Transportation Improvement Program is $ 908,000.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
All standard procedures and measures will be implemented to avoid and
minimize environmental impacts. Approximately 1.0 acre of wetlands will
be disrupted by this project for construction of the temporary detour, and
0.2 acre of wetlands will be needed for construction of the shifted
approach roadway. The temporary detour embankment will be removed
following construction of the permanent structure and restored to promote
regeneration of the wetland functions in these areas. Best Management
Practices will be utilized to minimize impacts.
If the State Historic Preservation Officer determines that an
intensive archaeological survey is needed for this project, the survey
will be completed prior to construction.

7
Wetlands fall under the broad category of "Waters of the United
States" as defined in 33 CFR 328.3. From bank to bank Little Northeast
Creek can be considered "Waters of the United States" and, as suchi`falls
E under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The three
remaining quadrants of the project area (SE, NW, and NE) all support
wetland areas beyond the bank to bank "Waters of the United States".These wetlands are part of a larger bottomland hardwood system,
to-
differing hydrological conditions in each but dui quadrant, locally support
uniquely.different plant communities.
Dominant canopy species found in the southeast quadrant include red
maple (Acer rubrum), black gum (Nyssa sy tica), laurel oak ( uercus
laurifolia), willow oak (Q hellos), American elm (Ulmus americana), and
ironwood (Car inus caroliniana). The midstory and shrub layers of the
southeast quadrant are dominated by saplings of the canopy species, and
tag alder (A)nus serrulata), wax myrtle (M rica cerifera), swamp dogwood
(Cornus stricta), American holly (Ilex o aca), privett (Liqustrum
sinense), and blueberry (Vaccinium s.)..High climbing vines, such as
green briar (Smilax laurifolia, S. bona=nox, S. rotundifolia) and poison
ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), extend well into the midstory. The ground
cover is sparse at this time of year and is dominated by seedlings of the
canopy and midstory species, and giant cane (Arundinaria i antea), violet
(Viola sp.), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera a onica).
In the northwest quadrant, dominant canopy species found include
water oak ( uercus nigra), swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii),.red maple
(Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), ironwood (Carpinus
caroliniana), and loblolly pine (Pines taeda). The midstory and shrub
layer are dominated by saplings of the canopy species, and American holly
(Ilex o aca), wax myrtle (M rica cerifera), and blueberry (Vaccinium sp.).
Green briar (Smilax bona-nox) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
climb high up into the midstory. The ground cover in this area is sparse
at this time of year and is dominated by seedlings of the canopy and
midstory species, and wild onion (Allium sk.), rush (Juncus sp.), and
netted chain fern (Woodwardia areolata).
The northeast quadrant of the project area is mostly inundated by
water and is dominated by sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple
(Acer rubrum), elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), privett (Liqustrum
sinense), common cattail (Typha latifolia), and rush (Juncus sue.).
Acreages of permanent and temporary potential impacts to wetlands are
tabulated below for each of the alternates studied:
Permanent Temporary
Altrernate Impact (acre) Impact (acre)
Alternate 1 0.2 0.6
Alternate 2 0.2 1.3
Alternate 2A (Recommended) 0.2 1.0
Alternate 3 1.0 0

WETLAND MITIGATION SITE SUCCESS FORM
• APPLICANT/PROJECT NAME :
NC DOT Replace Bridge 121 on SR 1406
• DEM #: WQC#: MAP #:
93044 2735 4
• COUNTY:
Onslow
• LOCATION OF MITIGATION SITE (LAT. AND LONG.)
• DIRECTIONS TO MITIGATION SITE:
• ACREAGE AND TYPE OF WETLAND IMPACTED:
0.66
• ACREAGE AND TYPE OF WETLAND MITIGATED:
0.24 wooded swamp wetlands
• DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION(IN FILE):
Remove fill from detour areas. Restore to original elevation and plant vegetation.
Two small areas of high ground will be lowered to wetlands elevation. One acre on thje
NE side of the bridge will be lowered and planted
• DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION(IN FILE):
Overcup oak, Swamp chestnut oak, Water oak, Black gum, Water tupelo, Bald cypress
• SUCCESS CRITERIA STATED(if any):
none
• WHAT IS THE PROJECT STATUS?(mark one):
RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, CREATION, PRESERVATION
• MONITORING PLAN:
Annual reports for 3 yrs. to DEM
• WHICH REGULATORY AGENCIES ARE INVOLVED?:
DEM, DCM
• TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT(mark the ones that apply):
PLURAL, URBAN, PUBLIC, PRIVATE
AW-
FIELD INFORMATION
• DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION(AT SITE):
• SURFACE WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS:
• SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER RELATIONSHIPS:
• HAVE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS BEEN MET?:
0 DESCRIPTION OF SOIL SAMPLE TAKEN:
d +SraT?d
s -4c:: s
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Ralei;h, North Carolina 27604
March 15, ,993
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Mr. Barney O'Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Wetlands or Waters
Bridge replacement, # 121 on SR 1406
Onslow County - DEM Project # 93044
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in wetlands or waters which are tributary
to Little Northeast. Creek for bridge replacement located at SR
1406 in Onslow County, we have determined that the proposed fill
can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2735
issued January 2.1, 1992. A copy of the General Certification is
attached. This Certification may be used in qualifying for
coverage under Corps of Engineers' General Permit No. 031. Since
this location is part of the Division of Environmental
Management's ambient water quality network, DOT is required to
notify-the Wilmington office of DEM .(Stephanie Petter.at 395-
3900) immediately before construction and after the site is _
stabilized. Annual reports shall be completed for three years
concerning the mitigation. Two copies of these reports shall be
sent to DEM - Central Office.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
Preston Howard, r. P.E.
APH:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of.Engineers Wilmington Field.Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John,Dorneyx
CentaigX A46 , Ugh North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Egtnl Oppominicy Affirmative Action Employer
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NC DOT/BRIDGE #121/B.J. O'QUINN, ASST. BR. MGR.
PAGE #3
Construction along the new road and bridge alignment will involve the permanent
displacement of 3650 sq. ft. of '404' wetlands on the south side and 1500 sq. ft. of
wetlands on the north side. These areas measure 365' x 20', and 150' x 20',
respectively. These impacts to the swamp will occur on the east side of the new road
alignment and are in addition to the wetlands displaced by the temporary detour. The
old 90' bridge span will be demolished along with the removal of all support piles in
the creek bed. The new bridge span measures approximately 130' long. In order to fit
the span and apply the necessary rock riprap around the abutments, the bank must be
excavated 20' x 65' on either side of the creek. As proposed, the excavation some 16
cu. yds. will take place above the NWL. The spoil material from the project will be
transported by truck to an upland site.as yet not determined by DOT.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The proposed temporary detour crossing of Little
Northeast Creek will displace an estimated 28,749 sq. ft., or 0.66 acres of '404'
wetlands. In addition, the new road alignment involves another 5,150 sq. ft., or 0.13
acres of swamp vegetation. The DOT Mitigation Plan includes restoration of the
detour, as well as adding some 11,925 sq. ft. (0.24 acres) of wetlands to the system by
excavating adjacent highground property and planting swamp tree species. The
Mitigation Plan also calls for removing the four conduit pipes and all fill from the
creek bed. Although the new bridge span will be somewhat longer than the existing
structure, the overall footprint above the creek will remain the same while the vertical
clearance of the structure will be increased by about 2'.
PREPARED BY: JAMES L. MERCER
DATE: February 4, 1993

JAN 2 1993 3
-------------- - --------------
Mitigation Summary
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130'feet.>long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway.
Due to high traffic volumes and the lack of suitable
off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained on-site
during the construction period by providing a temporary
detour on the east side of the existing alignment. The
temporary crossing of Little Northeast Creek will.be
accomplished by utilizing four temporary 84" corrugated steel
pipes.
IMPACTS
Due to filling associated with the.shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the temporary
detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66 acres of
bottomland hardwood wetland habitat.
MITIGATION
The temporary detour_ embankment will be removed
following completion of construction, and the disturbed area
restored to its original elevation. Additionally, two small
upland areas exist within the boundaries of the detour (see
sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). These two upland sites total
approximately 0.08 acres in size. Following completion of
construction, these two areas will also be graded to wetland
elevatioW (approximate elevation 4.51).

NCDOT will also purchase a parcel of land approximately
120 feet east of the existing centerline at station 65+50.
This area is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x 70',
or 0.16 acres in size. This area is bounded on three sides
by a bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain
this mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase
the tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation.
After grading of the sites are completed, wetland tree
species such as overcup oak (Quercus 1 ry ata), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), water oak (Quercus nigra), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica) and bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted on 8 to 10 foot centers to
compensate for project related wetland impacts. NCDOT proposes to
plant five of the listed species. Species compositions will be
approximately equal. If less than five species are available at
the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with environmental agency
personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. NCDOT will
attempt to obtain one year old seedlings (12-18" tall) with 1/4"
minimum root collar diameter. If possible, all seedlings will be
obtained from suppliers at approximately the same longitude as the
planting site.
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
As proposed, the project will lead to a temporary impact to
0.66 acres of wetland' habitat, and the permanent loss of 0.13
acres of wetland habitat. Successful implementation of NCDOT's
mitigation proposal will lead to the restoration of 0.66 acres of
wetland habitat, and the creation of 0.24 acres of wetland habitat
(two 0.04 acre sites within temporary detour route, onel-0-16"acre
site just outside of project limits). O
The restored and created wetland systems north of Little
Northeast -Creek will be in NCDOT permanent right of way, and will
therefore be protected from future development. The restored and
created wetland systems south of Little Northeast Creek do not
occur in permanent NCDOT right of way. However, due to the
exceedingly wet nature of this area., it is unlikely that any
development would obtain the permit authorization required for any
development.
To: John Dorney
Planning Branch
F mm I 11993
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT [=WA
CAMA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEWER: GREGS011-
WQ SUPERVISOR: ADKINS
DATE: March P,.11993
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKING
PERMIT YR: 93 PERMIT NO.: 93044 COUNTY: Onslow
PROJECT NAME: NC DOT Bridge #121
PROJECT TYPE: Bridge PERMIT TYPE: CAMA
COE #: N/A DOT#: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: February 8, 1993
REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030502
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Little Northeast Creek
CLASS: C NSW STREAM INDEX #: 19-16-2
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed
WL IMPACT: Yes WL TYPE: FTBH
WL REQUESTED: 0.77 WL ACR EST: No
HYDRO CNECT?: Yes WL SCORE: N/A
MITIGATION: Yes MITIGATION TYPE: Create
MITIGATION SIZE: 0.24 RATING SHEET ATTACHED?: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: No
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants propose to replace Bridge
#121 on SR 1406 over Little Northeast Creek. A temporary detour
road will result in the temporary filling of approximately 28,729
sq. ft. of wooded swamp. Construction of the new bridge will
result in the permanent filling of approximately 5,150 sq. ft. of
wooded swamp. NCDOT plans to mitigate for the wetland losses by.
grading approximately 0.24 acres of highground to wetland
elevations and planting five different hardwood swamp tree
species.
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #2675 for NCDOT Bridges
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WATER: 5000 sq. ft. WETLAND: 33,899 sq. ft.
IS FILL ELIMINATING ASIGNIFICANT USE? NO

? 0
??+ b

,Ilk 'IN

C
n

y ? 1\

r

c
.? L

' O
?
r y
?
6 a ? a

z ?? o

? a
? z
y
? b

Oil

? a
? d
v ..
-? G
ro

A
X

z b

a o

z° y Q

d

ti
N
G'
v

1,. STAlg o
z
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Mei?h, North Carolina 27604
March 15, 1993
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan a Howes, Secretary
Mr. Barney O'Quinn
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Dear Mr. O'Quinn:
Subject: Proposed Fill in Wetlands or Waters
Bridge replacement, # 121 on"SR 1406
Onslow County DEM Project # 93044
Upon review of your request for Water Quality Certification
to place fill material in wetlands or waters which are tributary
to Little Northeast Creek for bridge replacement located at SR
1406 in Onslow County, we have determined that the proposed fill
can be covered by General Water Quality Certification No. 2735
issued January 21, 1992. A copy of the General Certification is
attached. This Certification may be used in qualifying for
coverage under Corps of Engineers' General Permit No. 031. Since
this location is part of the Division of Environmental
Management's ambient water quality network, DOT is required to
notify-the Wilmington office of DEM .(Stephanie Petter.at 395-
3900) immediately before construction and after the site is
stabilized. Annual reports shall be completed for three years
concerning the mitigation. Two copies of these reports shall be
sent to DEM - Central Office.
If you have any questions, please contact John Dorney at
919/733-1786.
Sincerely,
l?
Preston Howard, r. P.E.
APH:JD
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field.Office
Wilmington DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney:
Cenmi& A6* , Ugh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
00
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
WATER QUALITY SECTION
TELECOPY TO:
FAX NUMBER:
FROM:
FAX # [phone]
V
PHONE. ?3? 1?
NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THE COVER SHEET:

?. t 1 V?? / vLr

?f
yxsc

TRANSMISSION REPORT

( MAR 19 '93 10:34RN )

*
*
* DATE START REMOTE TERMINAL MODE TIME RESULTS TOTAL DEPT. FILE
* TIME IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE NO.

* *
* MAR 19 10:32AM DIV OF COASTAL MGMNT G3 ST 01'14" OK 02
* *
* *
*
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *

* *
* *
* *

* *
*
* *
* *
* *
* *

`I 1,0.5fA7£ o
,:.. S
Mn r? Ar ?
7
I ?? 1
r
NDli
1991
DIVISION OF
State of North Carolina COASTAL PJIANAGEMENT
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
- 512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor February, 4, 1993
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
MEMORANDUM: r
RECEIVED
TO: Mr. A: Preston Howard, P.E., Acting Director
Division of Environmental Management $ 1993
FROM: John R. Parker, Chief Wilmington Regional Office
Major Permits Processing Section DEM
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NC DOT/Bridge #121/B. J. O'Quinn, Asst. Br. Mgr.
Project Location: Bridge #121, SR1406, Little Northeast Creek, north of Piney Green,
Onslow County
Proposed Project: to replace Bridge #121 and SR1406 over Little Northeast Creek; a
temporary detour with 'fill' in the creek and wetlands will be
constructed east of the bridge alignment.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return
this form by February 25, 1993. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project,
please contact Jim Mercer at 919/726-7021. When appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
::L//This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
__OL SIGNED DATE 1'J h ?
_0_)? CW _??
P.O. x 27687, Ra , North Ca a 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
1 An Equal rtunity Affirmative Action Employer
t
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC DOT/Bridge #121/B.J. O'Quinn, Asst. Br. Mgr.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge #121, SR1406, Little Northeast Creek, north of Piney
Green, Onslow County
FI)
Photo Index - 1989: NOT AVAILABLE 1984: N/A FFEB State Plane Coordinates - X: 2501900 Y: 367900
1 51993 }
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 12/11/92
Was Applicant Present - YES
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - January 22, 1993
Office - Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Onslow County
Land Classification From LUP - Transition/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge #121
Planned - Replace bridge approaches plus detour
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: -0-
Source - Observations
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
'404' Wetlands - Temporary 28,749 sq. ft.
" it - Permanent 5,150 sq. ft.
It It - Mitigation 11,925 sq. ft.
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
Creek Bottom - Temporary 5,000 sq. ft.
Bridge - Footprint 5,200 sq. ft.
(C) Other
Highground 45,425 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: Approximately 2.27 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: NO
(F) Water Classification: 'C' Open: NO
* U.S.G.S. 7.5 MIN. TOPO 'CAMP LEJEUNE' PR 1971
r
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NC DOT/BRIDGE #121/B.7. O'QUINN, ASST. BR. MGR.
PAGE #2
8. PROTECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes toyreplace Bridge #121 and SR1406
over Little Northeast Creek; a temporary detour with fillin the creek and wetlands will
be constructed east of the bridge alignment.
9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The North Carolina Department of Transportation
(DOT) proposed to replace Bridge #121 and a segment of SR1406 over Little Northeast
Creek, located 2.3 miles north of Highway 24 and Piney Green, in Onslow County,
NC. The U. S. G. S. 7.5 Min. Topographic Maps, entitled "Kellum" and "Camp
Lejeune" shows the project site and the surrounding road system in relationship to the
creek and wooded wetland areas. In general, the State Road runs north and south, and
the creek runs east and west. The COE/CAMA color aerial photography does not
cover the project site.
During construction, vehicular traffic will be detoured along a temporary fill crossing
just east of the existing bridge. Wooded swamp wetlands of the '404' type
characterize the project site and the Class 'C' waters in the upper reaches of Little
Northeast Creek. A temporary detour has been chosen since there are no other off-site
road crossings of Little Northeast Creek in the near vicinity and since the centerline of
the existing roadway and bridge (a total of approximately 900 In. ft.) must be shifted
7.5' east of the existing alignment. It has been estimated that the temporary detour
will involve the filling of 28,749 sq. ft. of wooded swamp wetlands and approximately
5,000 sq. ft. of creek bottom below the plane of the NWL. Rather than bridging the
creek, the plans call for a series of four (4) 48" corrugated steel pipe arches to be
located in the stream bed to maintain surface water flow. A part of DOT's Mitigation
Plan for this project involves removing all fill in the wetlands and in the creek. The
disturbed areas within the swamp will be restored to their original elevation and
planted with five different types of tree seedlings: Overcup Oak; Swamp Chestnut
Oak; Water Oak; Black Gum; Water Tuppulo; and, Bald Cypress.
Two small areas of highground property within the detour alignment will be excavated
to a lower elevation equal to the adjacent wetlands. These two areas will add about
1,742 sq. ft. or 0.04 acres of wooded swamp wetlands to the wetlands system. The
DOT Mitigation Plan will be complete with the acquisition of a 1 acre section of land
located on the northeast side of the bridge about 120' east of SR1406. Within the 1
acre, DOT plans to reduce the elevation of a grassy upland site measuring about 100'
long x 70' wide. This area will be planted with the wetlands tree species already
mentioned. This 7,000 sq. ft. of new swamp will increase the overall mitigation to
approximately 11,925 sq. ft., or 0.24 acres.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NC DOT/BRIDGE #121/B.J. O'QUINN, ASST. BR. MGR.
PAGE #3
Construction along the new road and bridge alignment will involve the permanent
displacement of 3650 sq. ft. of '404' wetlands on the south side and 1500 sq. ft. of
wetlands on the north side. These areas measure 365' x 20', and 150' x 20',
respectively. These impacts to the swamp will occur on the east side of the new road
alignment and are in addition to the wetlands displaced by the temporary detour. The
old 90' bridge span will be demolished along with the removal of all support piles in
the creek bed. The new bridge span measures approximately 130' long. In order to fit
the span and apply the necessary rock riprap around the abutments, the bank must be
excavated 20' x 65' on either side of the creek. As proposed, the excavation some 16
cu. yds. will take place above the NWL. The spoil material from the project will be
transported by truck to an upland site as yet not determined by DOT.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS: The proposed temporary detour crossing of Little
Northeast Creek will displace an estimated 28,749 sq. ft., or 0.66 acres of '404'
wetlands. In addition, the new road alignment involves another 5,150 sq. ft., or 0.13
acres of swamp vegetation. The DOT Mitigation Plan includes restoration of the
detour, as well as adding some 11,925 sq. ft. (0.24 acres) of wetlands to the system by
excavating adjacent highground property and planting swamp tree species. The
Mitigation Plan also calls for removing the four conduit pipes and all fill from the
creek bed. Although the new bridge span will be somewhat longer than the existing
structure, the overall footprint above the creek will remain the same while the vertical
clearance of the structure will be increased by about 2'.
PREPARED BY: JAMES L. MERCER
DATE: February 4, 1993
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-Z.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
Both
c.
a. Name NC Dept. of Transportation
Attn: B.J. O'Quinn, Asst. Branch Mgr.
Address_pn Rnx 252n1
4 LAND AND-WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract +/- 1.5 acres
City Raleigh State NC d. Describe the planned use of the project.
91 - Public Transportation
Zip 27611 Day phone [phone]
X Landowner or .-Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) SR 1406 Bridge over
Little. N. E. Creek, B-215 gyp; a No 121
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED .
PROJECT
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
4' NGS 1929
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muc Mee, Marvyn, Goldsboro, Baymead
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1406 e. Vegetation on tract
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Pinev Green
c. County Onslow
d.. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
. jurisdiction? No
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Little Northeast Creek
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Replace existing bridge and
widen and realign approach road
3/91
Forested Wetlands
f. Man-made features now on tract Roadway and Bridge
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?.
Public
X Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not Zoned
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
C
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? No If so, by whom?
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structures propose dOne brigde w/ approaches,
one temporary detour
b. Number of lots or parcels
N/A
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.) N/A
d. Size of area to be gg-raded or disturbed
1 X15 acre
e.
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? NO
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
No net increase after removal of temporary
e our
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
asphalt and concrete
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
,Management? N/A
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treOvnt facilities.
j. Have these faci it ees received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
N/A
m. Water supply source N/A
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach acc sways or provide new access.
N/A
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? N/A
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Length- Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below Perm
MHW Terp
Upland fill
areas
+/ - 470'1 +/- 12.
+/- 700' +/- 45'
b. Amount of material to be excavated from below
water level in cubic yards
c. Type of material N/A
d.
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commer
.i
surface runoff '
down").
JAN 2 2 1993 f
2 10
Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swampss , or other wetlands?
Hi h ground excavation, in cubic yards
1§0 CY behind existing endbents
3/91
f. DiTenn io?1S of spo?l dirs?osal area
up and ispo spa of a not yet determined
g. Location of spoil disposal area upland site not
yet determined
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? unknown
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i.
Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? unknown
If so, where?
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic ya%ds be placed below
mean high water //
f. Type of fill material
N/A
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland, In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
swamps, or water are?b? ing items must be submitted:
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
water? yes instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 384 CY (temp detour) affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
in. Type of fill material select fill deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
n. Source of fill material suitable borrow site the project.
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? yes An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
o. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled 1l2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
470' avg x 12.5' avg perm. 700' avg x 45' avg Commission Rule 77.0203 for a detailed description.)
(temp)
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
and erosion controlled?
Standard NCDOT erosion adn sedimentation only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
control measures prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
r. What type of construction equipment will be used use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? backhoe, bulldozer of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment the like.
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts. A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A that opportunity.
?, T
i"
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level N/A
JAN221993
Z InI
Name
Address
Name
Address
SEE ATTACHED SHELI
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. if the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the ZJ_ day of J Al-3 u, 19.3
X
or A*thorizcp agent
6A _
VJM1J 10 d'
' E
i
,t
w..rwr?.... r ?r r w .rwrr rr rrrrw
3/91
SUMMARY
FELL BELOW
NORMAL WSE FILL IN
WETLAND TOTAL FILL IN
WETLANDS FILL IN
WETLANDS
TEMP. DETOUR 348 CY 4487 CY 4835 CY 0.66 AC
-L- REV. CY
0 360 C_Y _ 360 CY 0.13 AC
TOTAL _
348 CY 4847 CY _S 195 CY 0.79 AC
r
JAN 2 2 199
r...«...............,... "usages &
1 .

• I
I

1
27

O
z
Q ?

j

L l i i t r I -'' ?= j ? j

? n
/
/ 11
it 7,
))) ?? / I 1
7
01
J
G /
1 1-u i ' ! 1
I
-6 22
_ ?.
' I
i
c
V)
?u
I ?
0.
I ?
I o ?
I ? q
i
I
i
r
i j
J
..y
0
J
il
LJ
f --
!J
1_J
i?
L
0
i?
.i
Z
w
L
1
ll

J ? 1
w
u
III JAN22 1993

U
w !-
a_ U,
o
L?
.1' 0
w
S N
,1J O
of (,n
w
w
w
O m
_J
l.L- j
L,J l.J
cl- (>i, J
::) <tw
I1J
O iw
Z o Z Q
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 5 OF i? OCT. 1992
I
v
nq
I
I r91 I
I I
I I
I ? ?II
I I
I?
I

I 09
y

I , , I
it
d ? i _ l i `?
1
11 ?
I ? I
11
II { 1 ' II
1/' 11 1
1'I 1
J /
J 1
yW J cc
? ? vTT1
I 1
/ m
r ?t r
f
f '
r 'I
I !?
J
w
cl1
z
w
75 ?,
Io! Je?3?
97 Y
.-? .. ?J
---------------------------
V
Ln
N
0
1 !I
5 j I I T, !
I I ? I
I ! I
I ,
r ? i !

r
f
\
?I
t

?? 1 I• i li q L o
< I 1 II r IN W S
I J~
I I
II i ? I
I
II
ICJ f
i !
Q h
Q v o I `
I
? v I I
'Ai
i
62 i I
Gobi ?? ? i I i ' I
1
I J
cn
i
I
_ r
I vi'

l !
\ ?J v1
`= ?
O
1 Q`" O

\ .3 N1-I
.,i H;I',W
i I
?nr

its i ( \?I

G

S = ?
C
J U)
F-
C-`
J
w w J
t <t
m
?
- O
I-
Ul
liJ
U)
O
G
w
z
C7

I I
w
y
lv
0
7

«+w'?r...n+w.. w yr . r r r.rdr.a da d a tl v/Nf1
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 3 OF kt OCT. 1992
I
vJ
09
.v
J
11.1
1
z
o,
a
U
J
V'
I
I
I 1
I I ?I
/9
I
09
I
I I I
I
!,5
?r
i
1

?I
0

3NII

lU

O
Z
w
>
©
W
O

O w
'3:
Q
Z

7
J
J O
>J

m V
W
LA _
?
O W
??
z
w ;a

a ?
o
c
Q
I1

I
I
II
I I
1

I

1
-7-:1
?y
1
J
Q
1J
N
W
1-
Z
w
7

r L /
JAN 2 2 1993 1H
-- - - --------------- -
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 2 0 F H OCT. 1992
0 0
rv
ILI
- J
7:7 w
v
I
-??
77
T
L? =
( i1 rv,
i
r 'e?:ar
A. ,? 2 1-w

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET cc, OF i OCT. 1992

I

i _
Z-2 _
I - _
77,
' -
> cl-
?-I
j
i
Cl.
JAN221993
-----------------------------
I n N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
!" I WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET -7 OF 1? OCT. 1992

u fill '

i i^

i

?/ (\ J
I
i
i`
?. 1

\ \j
J

i
?i
I I
\
v i

/ i
I
rJ?1 li

(r I

i

i

_
J L

v 1 J

71 v
T
L
i
I l ? ft
<. <

`
Lli

L
o m

?
I E f m rrp
, on L
f? I
%f
J ,

?I JAN 2 i9Q3
Cv
oW

wrwr?...r rr rr• w rraw?w•teftt?
Z0
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ON SLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 9 OF 11 OCT. 1992

J
J

_O o /
I
cl?
0
v
7 I
cl?
I
l Q

N
I
I L
I
FI; I

N JAN 4 ? 1993
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
O N S LO W COUNTY °-------------------------
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
I
WETLAND PERMIT I
O O

SHEET lo OF i I OCT. 1992
( 17f-`-
JAN 2 1993
?? 3
mcf??
-----------------------------
Mitigation Summary
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure;<130 feet.ilong'and34"feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway.
Due to high traffic volumes and the lack of suitable
off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained on-site
during the construction period by providing a temporary
detour on the east side of the existing alignment. The
temporary crossing of Little Northeast Creek will be
accomplished by utilizing four temporary 84" corrugated steel
pipes.
IMPACTS
Due to filling associated with the shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the temporary
detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66 acres of
bottomland hardwood wetland habitat.
MITIGATION
The temporary detour embankment will be removed
following completion of construction, and the disturbed area
restored to its original elevation. Additionally, two small
upland areas exist within the boundaries of the detour (see
sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). These two upland sites total
approximately 0.08 acres in size. Following completion of
construction, these two areas will also be graded to wetland
elevation (approximate elevation 4.5').
NCDOT will also purchase a parcel of land approximately
120 feet east of the existing centerline at station 65+50.
This area is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x 70',
or 0.16 acres in size. This area is bounded on three sides
by a bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain
this mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase
the tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation.
After grading of the sites are completed, wetland tree
species such as overcup oak (Quercus 1 ry ata), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), water oak (Quercus nigra), black gum (N_yssa
sylvatica) water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica) and bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted on 8 to 10 foot centers to
compensate for project related wetland impacts. NCDOT proposes to
plant five of the listed species. Species compositions will be
approximately equal. If less than five species are available at
the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with environmental agency
personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. NCDOT will
attempt to obtain one year old seedlings (12-18" tall) with 1/4"
minimum root collar diameter. If possible, all seedlings will be
obtained from suppliers at approximately the same longitude as the
planting site.
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
As proposed, the project will lead to a temporary impact to
0.66 acres of wetland habitat, and the permanent loss of 0.13
acres of wetland habitat. Successful implementation of NCDOT's
mitigation proposal will lead to the restoration of 0.66 acres of
wetland habitat, and the creation of 0.24 acres of wetland habitat
(two 0.04 acre sites within temporary detour route, one O. 16"acr e
site just outside of project limits).
The restored and created wetland systems north of Little
Northeast Creek will be in NCDOT permanent right of way, and will
therefore be protected from future development. The restored and
created wetland systems south of Little Northeast Creek do not
occur in permanent NCDOT right of way. However, due to the
exceedingly wet nature of this area, it is unlikely that any
development would obtain the permit authorization required for any
development.
To: John Dorney
Planning Branch
D
,C. UW y
MAR 1 11993
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CANA MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW WA
REGIONAL OFFICE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEWER: GREGSO
WQ SUPERVISOR: ADKINS
DATE: March , 1993
WETLAND INFORMATION FOR CENTRAL OFFICE TRACKING
PERMIT YR: 93 PERMIT NO.: 93044 COUNTY: Onslow
PROJECT NAME: NC DOT Bridge #121
PROJECT TYPE: Bridge PERMIT TYPE: CAMA
COE #: N/A DOT#: N/A
RCD FROM CDA: DCM DATE FROM CDA: February 8, 1993
REG OFFICE: WiRO RIVER AND SUB BASIN#: 030502
*STREAM OR ADJACENT WATER BODY: Little Northeast Creek
CLASS: C NSW STREAM INDEX #: 19-16-2
*OPEN OR CLOSED: Closed
WL IMPACT: Yes WL TYPE:
WL REQUESTED: 0.77 WL ACR EST:
HYDRO CNECT?: Yes WL SCORE:
MITIGATION: Yes MITIGATION TYPE:
MITIGATION SIZE: 0.24 RATING
RECOMMENDATION: ISSUE
STORMWATER PLAN REQ'D: No
IF YES, DATE APPROVED:
FTBH
No
N/A
Create
SHEET ATTACHED?: N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants propose to replace Bridge
#121 on SR 1406 over Little Northeast Creek. A temporary detour
road will result in the temporary filling of approximately 28,729
sq. ft. of wooded swamp. Construction of the new bridge will
result in the permanent filling of approximately 5,150 sq. ft. of
wooded swamp. NCDOT plans to mitigate for the wetland losses by
grading approximately 0.24 acres of highground to wetland
elevations and planting five different hardwood swamp tree
species.
WATER QUALITY CERT. (401)
CERT. REQ'D: Yes
IF YES, TYPE: General Certification #2675 for NCDOT Bridges
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
TYPE OF DISPOSAL PROPOSED: N/A
TO BE PERMITTED BY: N/A
IF BY DEM, IS SITE AVAILABLE AND PERMIT ISSUANCE PROBABLE: N/A
WATER/WETLAND FILL
AREA OF FILL - WATER: 5000 sq. ft. WETLAND: 33,899 sq. ft.
IS FILL ELIMINATING A SIGNIFICANT USE? NO
93044.Mar
Page Two
DREDGING
IS DREDGING ACTIVITY EXPECTED TO CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT LOSS
OF RESOURCE? N/A
IS SPOIL DISPOSAL ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED? N/A
MARINA
ARE THE FOLLOWING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED?
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: N/A MARINA SERVICES: N/A
OXYGEN IN BASIN: N/A CLOSURE OF SHELLFISHING WATERS: N/A
(ATTACH A MARINA USE ATTAINABILITY EVAL.)
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OR PERMIT RESTRICTIONS: That the project
be done in such a manner so as to not cause turbidity outside the
immediate construction area to exceed 50 NTU.
Due to the fact that this bridge location is a sampling
station, part of the State Ambient Network Monitoring Program, it
is recommended that NCDOT inform the Wilmington Regional Office
(Contact Stephanie Petter - 395-3900) prior to beginning
construction and immediately after site is stabilized post
construction.
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office Files
DCM-Mercer
John Parker
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC DOT/Bridge #121/B.J. O'Quinn, Asst. Br. Mgr.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Bridge #121, SR1406, Little Northeast Creek, north of Piney
Green, Onslow County
Photo Index - 1989: NOT AVAILABLE 1984: N/A
* State Plane Coordinates X: 2501900 Y: 367900
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA/D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 12/11/92
Was Applicant Present - YES
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - January 22, 1993
Office - Morehead City .
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Onslow County
Land Classification From LUP - Transition/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: PT
(C) Water Dependent: YES
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - Bridge #121
Planned - Replace bridge approaches plus detour
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: -0-
Source - Observations
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
'404' Wetlands - Temporary 289749 sq. ft.
" - Permanent 5,150 sq. ft.
" - Mitigation 11,925 sq. ft.
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
Creek Bottom - Temporary 5,000 sq. ft.
Bridge - Footprint 5,200 sq. ft.
(C) Other
Highground 45,425 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: Approximately 2.27 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: NO
(F) Water Classification: 'C' Open: NO
*.U.S.G.S. 7.5 MIN. TOPO 'CAMP LEJEUNE' PR 1971 .
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NC DOT/BRIDGE #121/B.J. O'QUINN, ASST. BR. MGR.
PAGE #2
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to replace Bridge #121 and SR1406
over Little Northeast Creek;. a temporary detour witefill`in the creek and wetlands will
be constructed east of the bridge alignment.

9. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION: The North Carolina Department of Transportation
(DOT) proposed to replace Bridge #121 and a segment of SR1406 over Little Northeast
Creek, located 2.3 miles "north of Highway 24 and Piney Green, in Onslow County,
NC. The U.S.G.S. 7.5 Min. Topographic Maps, entitled "Kellum" and "Camp
Lejeune". shows the project site and the surrounding road system in relationship to the
creek and wooded wetland areas. In general, the State Road runs north and south, and
the creek runs east and west. The COE/CAMA color aerial photography does not
cover the project site.
During construction, vehicular traffic will be detoured along a temporary fill crossing
just east of the existing bridge. Wooded swamp wetlands of the '404' type
characterize the project site and the Class 'C' waters in the upper reaches of Little
Northeast Creek. A temporary detour has been chosen since there are no other off-site
road crossings of Little Northeast Creek in the near vicinity and since the centerline of
the existing roadway and bridge (a total of approximately 900 In. ft.) must be shifted
7.5' east of the existing alignment. It has been estimated that the temporary detour
will involve the filling of 28,749 sq. ft. of wooded swamp wetlands and approximately
5,000 sq. ft. of creek bottom below the plane of the NWL. Rather than bridging the
creek, the plans call for a series of four (4) 48" corrugated steel pipe arches to be
located in the stream bed to maintain surface water flow. A part of DOT's Mitigation
Plan for this project involves removing all fill in the wetlands and in the creek. The
disturbed areas within the swamp will be restored to their original elevation and
planted with five different types of tree seedlings: Overcup Oak; Swamp Chestnut 1
Oak; Water Oak; Black Gum; Water Tuppulo; and, Bald Cypress. J
Two small areas of highground property within the detour alignment will be excavated
to a lower elevation equal to the adjacent wetlands. These two areas will add about
1,742 sq. ft. or 0.04 acres of wooded swamp wetlands to the wetlands system. The
DOT Mitigation Plan will be complete with the acquisition of a 1 acre section of land
located on the northeast side of the bridge about 120' east of SR1406. Within the 1
acre, DOT plans to reduce the elevation of a grassy upland site measuring about 100'
long x 70' wide. This area will be planted with the wetlands tree species already
mentioned. This 7,000 sq. ft. of new swamp will increase the overall mitigation to
approximately 11,925 sq. ft., or 0.24 acres.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT:
NC DOT/BRIDGE #121/B.J. O'QUINN, ASST. BR. MGR.
PAGE #3
Construction along the new road and bridge alignment will involve the permanent
displacement of 3650 sq. ft. of '404' wetlands on the south side and 1500 sq. ft. of
wetlands on the north side. These areas measure 365' x 20', and 150' x 20',
respectively. These impacts to the swamp will occur on the east side of the new road
alignment and are in addition to the wetlands displaced by the temporary detour. The
old. 90' bridge span will be demolished along with the removal of all support piles in
the creek bed. The new bridge span measures approximately 130' long. In order to fit
the span and apply the necessary rock riprap around the abutments, the bank must be
excavated 20' x 65' on.either side of the creek. As proposed, the excavation some 16
cu. yds. will take place above the NWL. The spoil material from the project will be
transported by truck to an upland site as yet not determined by DOT.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS:. The proposed temporary detour crossing of Little
Northeast Creek will displace an estimated 28,749 sq. ft., or 0.66 acres of '404'
wetlands. In addition, the.- road alignment involves another 5,150 sq. ft., or 0.13
acres of swamp vegetation. The DOT Mitigation Plan includes restoration of the
detour, as well as adding some 11,925. sq. ft. (0.24 acres) of wetlands to the system by
excavating adjacent highground property and planting swamp tree species. The
Mitigation Plan also calls for removing the four conduit pipes and all fill from the
creek bed. Although the new. bridge span will be somewhat longer than the existing
structure, the overall footprint above the creek will remain the same while the vertical
clearance of the structure will be increased by about 2'.
PREPARED BY: JAMES L. MERCER
DATE: February 4, 1993
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
Both
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
a. Name NC Dept. of Transportation commercial use?
Attn: B.J. O'Quinn, Asst. Branch Mgr. Public
Address PQ RnY 2S2fN
CityRaleigh State NC d. Describe the planned use of the project.
915-733-977W Public Transportation
Zi 27611
p Day phone [phone]
X Landowner or Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) SR 1406 Bridge over
Little. N. E. Creek, B-2158 Rr? QFo 12
4 LAND AND WATER
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the CHARACTERISTICS
owner's name and address.
a. Size of entire tract +/- 1.5 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED 4' NGS 1929
PROJECT d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee, Marvyn, Goldsboro, Baymead
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1406 c. Vegetation on tract Forested Wetlands
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Piney Green L Man-made features now on tract Roadway and Bridge
c. County Onslow
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? No
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Little Northeast Creek
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Replace existing bridge and
widen and realign approach road
3191
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
X Conservation Transitional
_ Developed Community
-Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not Zoned
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
C
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? No If so, by whom?
V
Pi Ji~,? w' 2 5-0-03

5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structuresproposedOne brigde w/ approaches,
one temporary detour
b. Number of lots or parcels
N/A
c. Density (Give the number ofN? A dential units and the
units per acre.)
d. Size of area to be g?5d acredisturbed
e.
If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins..
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submittedO to the Division of Land
Resources?
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
No net increase after removal of temporary
detour
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
asphalt and concrete
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management? N/A
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treAtlrlent facilities.
j. Have these faciNtAs received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
NIA
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commer ,
down,,), surface runoff
JAN 2 u 10,93
2 U?-rSt,L.:ju-a
m. Water supply source N/A
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach access Aways or provide new access.
o. If. the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? N/A
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or.fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Length- Width Depth
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
Perm.
wetland or belowTempMHW '
+/ - 470'I +/ - 12.
45'
Upland fill
areas
b. Amount of material to be excavated from
water level in cubic yards
c. Type of material N/A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swamps, or other wetlands?
N/A
Hi h ground excavation, in cubic yards
1§0 CY behind existing endbents
ij
E j 3/91
.1
f. Di e of s 1 disposal area
up alop spospai arlea not yet determined
g. Location of spoil disposal area upland site not
yet determined
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? unknown
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? unknown
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areAb?
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yar%We placed below
mean high water //
f. Type of fill material
N/A
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
water? yes instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 384 CY (temp detour) affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
m. Type of fill material select fill deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
n. Source of fill material suitable borrow site the project.
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
wetlands? yes An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
p. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled 1/2 x 11 white paper. (Refer to Coastal Resources
470' avg x 12.5' avg perm. ; 700' avg x 45' avg Commission Rule'
ule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
temp
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site Please note that original drawings are preferred and
and erosion controlled?
Standard NCDOT erosion adn sedimentation only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
control measures prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
r. What type of construction equipment will be used use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
dr(for example, ne, backhoe, or hydraulic of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
to ck hoe oe, bulldozer
to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment the like.
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
betaken to lessen environmental impacts. A storm«•ater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A that opportunity. D i '
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or ?I ;
..
norm al water level N/A
3/91
3
Name
Address
Name
Address
SEE ATTACHED SHELI
Name _
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract.. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check. for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. if the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal..Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
?-' ? ?? , 19C?
This is the Z- day of 'd A
X
Landown or *ho riz agent
_1 P
` I 1 r `1
,
ri ?J UL j....1
?
V ?
4 3/'91
SUMMARY
FILL BELOW
NORMAL WSE FILL IN
WETLAND TOTAL FILL IN
WETLANDS FILL IN
WETLANDS
TEMP. DETOUR 348 CY 4487 CY 4835 CY 0.66 AC
-L- REV. 0 CY 360 CY 360 CY 0.13 AC
TOTAL 348 CY 4847 CY 5195 CY 0.79 AC
I;st
r
JANI 2 2 1993

w
I
N I Q ?
r?`eo5i ? J ` 1 ? ? ? ?
r
(jk
Northeast
v F ??\ Jul v? 7
0
APO ? ?,?
\? ff N U
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
VICINITY ETA ? ONSLOW COUNTY
p'ROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
ll
LMV,-L!:'JIJ ! WETLAND PERMIT
ra Mil. EE iij ?` ? OCT. 1992
L --SHEET _ i OF ?i

J
7

1
i
I%*
C4 i
z
i
i I
? I
r •? J I
t.l o, i ?I E f C? i=c I I
??? rl I I I
C
i
J ? v
_ N k1
I
1 4
I^ ? 1
1 ?- _ - t
J ? 1
1
1 ?

i
1
I
1
i
I t \i I
1
i
?l
v
w
M-
td 7L
?- J
w
a) Ll 1
-r
t.:±

?
cl ?
)

i L-1 J

W I-
ii1

J r1

;')
lij

.
,._ ,;
Li
c.? c
z
u Q,
w ?-
?V
CL
U
2 l" J
O <{

;.:J iL

J ~
II LJ fJ
/

S w
J N
LJ
UJ
s
^ s In
• W
x
tA.J
W
v^
?
1
-
06
J F-
_
@ 7 7 L.I? t-- t W
.. -
, Lij?
o?
trim
aa?.aa+?? a ?............ .wA
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 5 OF 1? OCT. 1992
03
y
1
O
cO
L
rJ
J
lu
V

I
J }
I tc

4
f
{ I
?I I
I I
? I
I ? ?I
I I
l
09 I
I
li
?i
I.
i
J ?
a N I'1
W I?
/ ? uJ
N
l?
/. N
/ o
/ _7
j w
r
f'
I
?r
1 ?I
1
11 ?
V
=:D
l1l l
N
O
J
Q
111
w O Q
l.I.,
Z

7
lU
w'Z
O ca

l ? l r u- ll)

!?
, .•t}LC. G. Y. ( tee. •,{ ?

1 cl?
?
7

- -----------------------
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
I "
1` i }1
t
?I
I
1
0 v o
6-2) Fobs ?? ? i ? I
77,

r ?•,? Imo; ?? i
(
' 1 I

W
1 ? y
r
k
u
I
i
I

0
4
S

??AS

1
4i

1
V1
" 1
1 O Ill Q

? •
H I
?1-'r W
?

T
Ci
s
J
W
cn
J
_J
ti
11.I
F-
z
»
z
a
:J1
II
w
cy-
y
'C....'•
0
G
J
F-
LLJ
j
J
J
LL-
(Jl
1-
0
u
J
F?-
r?
Q.
l:
IT `T--'.
r it r fns:.
?C?uL1(? ULJ
.............
?r
IV, U. UCr I . yr i fV-\l-4,-;l vl I ? , .. ?.., .
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 3 OF ii OCT. 1992
..............
?
09,
.v

d I
5s I
I
l ? II
V

=:D

?l
aNll . tp
hi-,Lvbt4
w
T-
0
lJ
7
J
J
w
m
0

I
1
1
1
t
S
i
i
1 ?r
J
c?
tc
W
Z
W
w
ir1
N
N
O

O ©
Z W
H Ln
W
3
Loi

J
J
t'-
J
J o
?
?
O
V)
w

?
W
Q
LA
W
~O

Q _

TTrT7,.
JAN 2 2 1993
C5?5-6ZT G- L.L?%}
-----------------------------
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIUN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B - 2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET Z OF I I - OCT. 1992

1

1
1 l.-

L^

r ?
r l L-

1?
. 1
L.
7?-
Lo
I
i
i
I'D
0 0
r-v
a a
1 • ,1
J '
1
-? LLI
i
^
t _1
I
?t
I ?
n?
a:
h'
ci•r-,i, :.+ 11 is ._
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET L- OF i i OCT. 1992

- :,
_ 1•
,ice
r ?
?I I ? I
I \ ul
,

1
rJ,
. ?1
i•?

cl,
JAN 2 2 1,493
?J
-J
1-
c'
LLJ
J
d
d

i N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
w ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B - 2158
WETLAND PERMIT
I
SHEET -7 OF ?? OCT. 1992

- ; ij r

1

i` ;j/"

1 J
1
Q
!
\ \ j
?
?

ii k
v

r y;
I \ •.

y
:::

i
! i
i
J j -
J ?
J -
L
tZ7
j ',_-' r .
LLJ-
. .1 y.
r y
LLJ
w ?r
IT,r-mrT -
M
_-
Ejl JAW 2 2 1993 ? !J y
r D <. `..i
Ow
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 9 OF 11 OCT. 1992

?
I

? 1
I

J
J
l? \

u n ?
J ? 1=
ccf
c.) = j
cr) I

I

I N
I
I ?
I
i?• I
? JAN 2 ? i?a9
f ?;
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION I
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Y ?uSt7
ONSLOW COUNTY ------------------ -
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158 I I
WETLAND PERMIT I
O O
`
SHEET r o OF I i OCT. 1992

C
f
LL.I
d ?
C? ?9

JAN221993
jyt ?`
- Mitigation Summary
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with ?ewtc?i xri:?Q ve
The centerline of the re lacement.,structure will be
}iis minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the westV X
acC mmadate s?'i?ht? t-er1L*m. h All widening o
-Oie roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway.
Due to high traffic volumes and the lack of suitable
off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained on-site
during the construction period by providing a temporary
detour on the east side.of the existing alignment. The
temporary crossing of Little Northeast Creek will be
accomplished by utilizing Jb t. uxiT!ga
IMPACTS
Due to filling associated with the shifting,of the
centerline, °A: acaresw..of jurisdictional -wet?.lfta!2babitat a .
jpgk psttOd'The majority of this impact will occur in a
roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the temporary
detour will lead to the VCsmporary; joss of: b= cr s if
and-har_dp,Tgod_, wetland habitat.
MITIGATION
The temporary detour embankment will be removed
following completion of construction, and the disturbed area
restored to its original elevation. Additionally, two small
upland areas exist within the boundaries of the detour (see
sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). These two upland sites total
approximately 0.08 acres in size. Following completion of
construction, these two areas will also be graded to wetland
elevation.(approximate elevation 4.51).
- NCDOT will also purchase a parcel of land approximately
120 feet east of the existing centerline at station 65+50.
This area is an upland grassy.area approximately 100' x 701,
or 0.16 acres in size. This area is bounded on three sides
by a bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain
this mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase
.the tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
- by a line running.' perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation.
After grading of the sites are completed, wetland tree
species such as overcup oak (Quercus 1 ry ata), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), water oak ( uercus ni ra), black gum (N_yssa
sylvatica) water tupelo (NNyssa aquatica) and bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted on 8 to 10 foot centers to
compensate for project related wetland impacts. NCDOT proposes to
plant five of the listed species. Species compositions will be
approximately equal. If less than five species are available at
the.time of planting, NCDOT will consult with environmental agency
personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. NCDOT will
attempt to obtain one year old seedlings (12-18" tall) with 1/4"
minimum root collar diameter. If possible, all seedlings will be
obtained from suppliers at approximately the same longitude as the
planting site.
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
As proposed, the project will lead to a temporary impact to
0.66 acres of wetland habitat, and the permanent loss of 0:13
acres of wetland habitat. Successful implementation of NCDOT's
mitigation proposal will lead to the restoration of 0.66 acres of
wetland habitat, and the creation of 0.24 acres of wetland habitat
(two 0.04 acre sites within temporary detour route, on:3fcr ="'
site just outside of project limits). ?D1?7
The restored and created wetland systems north of Little
Northeast Creek will be in NCDOT permanent right of way, and will
therefore be protected from future development. The restored and
created wetland systems south of Little Northeast Creek do not
occur in permanent NCDOT right of way. However, due to the
exceedingly wet nature of this area, it is unlikely that any
development would obtain the permit authorization required for any
development.

Adjacent Property Owners
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
Mr. Cecil Morton
910 Elaine Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Mr. Tommy Morton Jr.
Route 2, Box 500
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Mary Venters
Route 2, Box 467
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Belinda Stephens -
611 Linwood Avenue
Durham, NC 27708
Ms. Evelyn White
Route 2, Box 503
Jacksonville, NC 28546
LAN2 1993 t
l

D

2 21993
fEB L
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney, Division of Environmental Management
FROM: David Yow, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Date: February 22, 1993
SUBJECT: N. C. Department of Transportation (NCDOT) request for
401 Water Quality Certification, Replacement of Bridge
No. 121 on SR 1406 over Little Northeast Creek, Onslow
County, North Carolina, TIP No. B-2158, DEM Project No.
93044.
The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has reviewed
the subject application for 401 Water Quality Certification, and
a site inspection was conducted on December 11, 1992. We have
provided minor modifications to the CAMA/Dredge and Fill permit
for this project, and a copy of our comments to the Division of
Coastal Management is attached for your files. The modified
project should minimize impacts on aquatic habitat quality
resulting from construction, and the NCWRC offers no further
modifying comment on the issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification for the proposed work. It is understood that the
NCDOT will require project contractors to adhere to Best
Management Practices during construction.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide input to the permit
review process for this project. If I can further assist your
office, please contact me at [phone].
CC: Bennett Wynne, District 2 Fisheries Biologist
t ", it
e STA7Z 4
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
January 19, 1993
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
225 N. McDowell Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
ATTENTION: Mr. John Parker
?3aq4
C

DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Onslow County, SR 1406, Bridge No. 121 over
Little Northeast Creek, State Project No.
8.2260401, TIP No. B-2158.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is
proposing to replace Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast
Creek on SR 1406 near the city of Jacksonville in Onslow
County. This proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130 feet long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway. The power and telephone lines running east
of the proposed roadway will be relocated to the west side of
the roadway, and will utilize the water and sewer line right
of way.
Due to high traffic volumes (9,600 VPD) and the lack of
suitable off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained
on-site during the construction period by providing a
temporary detour on the east side of the existing alignment
(see sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). The temporary crossing of
Little Northeast Creek will be accomplished by utilizing four
temporary 84" corrugated steel pipes (see sheets 5 of 11 and
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
NOTICE OF FILING OF
APPLICATION FOR CAMA MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT AND WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
The Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources her gives public
notice as required by NCGS 113A-119(b) and 143-215 3(a)(1)(c) that the North Carolina
Department of Transportation filed an application on January 22, 1993, for a permit from the
Division of Coastal Management to develop in an Area of Environmental Concern and for
certification from the Division of Environmental Management that a discharge of fill material
in project wetlands will not violate applicable water quality standards.
According to said application, the applicant is proposing to replace Bridge #121 and
SR1406 over Little Northeast Creek, north of the community of Piney Green, in Onslow
County. A temporary detour with "fill" in the creek and wetlands will be constructed east of
the bridge alignment.
A copy of the entire application and additional information may be examined (or
copies furnished upon request and payment of reproduction costs) during normal business
hours at the office of Jim Mercer, Division of Coastal Management, located in the Division
of Marine Fisheries Building, Morehead City, N.C., 919/726-7021, and/or the office of Rick
Shiver, Division of Environmental Management, DEHNR Regional Field Office,
Wilmington, N.C., [phone].
The Division of Environmental Management proposes to take final action on this
water quality certification on or before March 18, 1993. The issuance of the CAMA Major
Development permit and the Section 401 Certification may deviate from this projected date
depending upon the nature of the comments submitted and subsequent hearings that may
result.
All persons desiring to make comments should do so in writing to Roger N. Schecter,
Director, Division of Coastal Management, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C., 27611, prior to
March 13, 1993 for consideration in the CAMA permit decision, and to Mr. John Dorney,
Division of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, N.C., 27611, prior to
March 8, 1993 for consideration in the water quality certification decision. Later comments
on the CAMA application will be accepted and considered -up to the time of permit decision.
Project modifications may occur based on review and comment by the public and state and
federal agencies. Notice of the permit decision in this matter will be provided upon request.
PUBLISHED ON: Saturday, February 20, 1993
Pr_
Ir ® Noah Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Parker, Jr., Chief
Major Permits Processing Section
Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
FROM: David Yow, Highway Project Coordinator ??
Habitat Conservation Program _
DATE: February 22, 1993
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review,
Bridge No. 121, SR1406 over Little Northeast
Creek, Onslow County, North Carolina.
The N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) has
completed a review of the proposed project and possible
impacts on existing wildlife and fishery resources in the
area. The project and proposed mitigation were discussed on
site with personnel from the N. C. Department of
Transportation (NCDOT), the Division of Coastal Management,
and the National Marine Fisheries Service on December 11,
1992. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48
Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d). By copy of this
memorandum, the NCWRC will also provide comment on the
attending 401 Water Quality Certification to the N. C.
Division of Environmental Management.
The NCDOT plans to replace an obsolete highway bridge
and slightly shift roadway approaches, with fill of 0.13
acres of previously disturbed wetlands associated with
widened road shoulders. Of.greater significance is the loss
of 0.66 acres of bottomland hardwood forest associated with
construction of a temporary detour facility. Installation
and removal of pipe arches associated with the temporary
detour will also impact aquatic habitat in and near the
project area. While the affected stream segment does not
constitute high quality reproductive area for freshwater or
1
Memo Page 2 February 22, 1993
anadromous fishes, loss of cover and increased turbidity
will temporarily degrade aquatic habitat.
The NCDOT proposes to mitigate for wetland loss on site
by restoring all bottomland hardwood habitat impacted by the
temorary detour (0.66 acres) and creating additional
wetlands (0.24 acres) to compensate for permanent fill
areas.' Wetland creation efforts, if successful, will
mitigate for permanent wetland loss at a ratio of roughly
two to one. While the initial quality of restored and
created habitat will be lower than that presently existing
in the temporary detour area, wildlife habitat quality will
be improved over that existing along the road shoulder where
permanent fill is proposed. The created mitigation area
will remain in NCDOT ownership and will be protected from
future development.
The mitigation plan accompanying the permit application
is acceptable to the NCWRC, and the NCDOT environmental
specialists are to be commended for their efforts to address
our concerns. We request that the following minor
modifications be included as permit conditions:
(1) Since wetland creation is involved, we ask that
the site be checked at the end of three years to
verify adequate survival of tree seedlings. While
the NCWRC understands that NCDOT resources are
limited, a simple monitoring plan for mitigation
success may provide useful information for future
application on similar projects. If mitigation
efforts are unsuccessful, alternative strategies
for wetland credit may then be developed in
cooperation with reviewing agencies.
(2) Prior to instream disturbance associated with
excavation or fill activities, the Project
Engineer will consult Bennett Wynne, District
Fisheries Biologist, at [phone] regarding
likely impacts.on fish reproduction in the project
area. Since both installation and removal of the
temporary crossing structures will be involved,
this may be a more practical approach than a
simple moratorium on instream work.
(3) Seeding of graded wetland and upland areas should
involve plant varieties of value to wildlife, and
use of fescue should be avoided if possible.
(4) Following removal of fill material from the
temporary detour site and prior to planting, the
NCDOT should insure that underlying material is
not compacted.

Memo Page 3 February 22, 1993
(5) Clearing of mature hardwood overstory associated
with the temporary detour should be minimized.
(6) Following removal of the temporary crossing
structure, the stream channel should be restored
to its original width, depth, and substrate
character. Stream banks should be stabilized with
vegetation, and use of rip-rap should be avoided
if possible.
(7) As always, strict erosion control measures should
be. implemented and maintained throughout
construction.
The modifications listed above have been discussed with
NCDOT environmental personnel, and the NCWRC offers no
objection to the issuance of a CAMA/Dredge and Fill Permit
and associated 401 Water Quality Certification for the
project as modified.
Thank you for the ongoing opportunity to provide input
to planning stages for this project. If I can further
assist your office, please contact me at [phone].
cc: Bobby Maddrey, District 2 Wildlife Biologist
Bennett Wynne, District 2 Fisheries Biologist
/John Dorney, Water Quality Section, DEM, DEHNR
N. *C.-tEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATE
TRANSMITTAL SLIP
TO: REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
_ Eric S''I" t 1- t7?
FROM
I'LLI I e ?VVXs REF. NO. OR ROOM, BLDG.
%+E
ACTION
? NOTE AND FILE ? PER OUR CONVERSATION
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ME ? PER YOUR REQUEST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS ? FOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT THIS ? FOR YOUR INFORMATION
? PLEASE ANSWER ? FOR YOUR COMMENTS
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SIGNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
Aft
JAMES G. MARTIN
GOVERNOR
THOMAS J. HARRELSON
SECRETARY
.?SY QIMM ?*
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P.O. BOX 25201
RALEIGH 27611-5201
January 19, 1993
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment, Health and
Natural Resources
225 N. McDowell Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
ATTENTION: Mr. John Parker
9_30?+
J
7 ,
JAI?i 2 1993
WATER QUALITY _ ;?
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WILLIAM G. MARLEY, JR., P.E.
STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: Onslow County, SR 1406, Bridge No. 121 over
Little Northeast Creek, State Project No.
8.2260401, TIP No. B-2158.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is
proposing to replace Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast
Creek on SR 1406 near the city of Jacksonville in Onslow
County. This proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130 feet long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway. The power and telephone lines running east
of the proposed roadway will be relocated to the west side of
the roadway, and will utilize the water and sewer line right
of way.
Due to high traffic volumes (9,600 VPD) and the lack of
suitable off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained
on-site during the construction period by providing a
temporary detour on the east side of the existing alignment
(see sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). The temporary crossing of
Little Northeast Creek will be accomplished by utilizing four
temporary 84" corrugated steel pipes (see sheets 5 of 11 and
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
A
9 of 11) .
Due to filling associated with the shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
cleared roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the
temporary detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66
acres of bottomland hardwood wetland habitat. The temporary
detour embankment will be removed following completion of
construction, and the disturbed area restored. This
restoration effort is outlined in the enclosed mitigation
plan summary. Additionally, two small upland areas exist
within the boundaries of the detour (see sheets 4 of 11 and 5
of 11). These upland sites are both approximately 0.04 acres
in size. Following completion of construction, these two
areas will be graded to wetland elevation and planted with
wetland species as outlined in mitigation planting plan,
resulting in 0.08 acres of created wetland habitat.
A temporary construction easement has been obtained to
allow for the temporary detour. The boundaries of this
easement fall slightly outside the temporary construction
footprint. However, it is not anticipated that any clearing
or filling will take place outside of the construction
footprint shown on the drawings. If, during construction, it
is determined that any additional area needs to be cleared,
NCDOT will inform the various permitting agencies and will
also include this area in our restoration efforts.
During an on-site permit agency coordination meeting
held on December 11, 1992, N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
personnel requested that NCDOT investigate purchasing a small
piece of land just outside of the project limits for use in
further mitigating for temporary and permanent habitat
losses. This parcel of land is approximately 120 feet east
of the existing centerline at station 65+50. The landowner
has indicated a willingness to sell this property, and NCDOT
is presently negotiating to purchase the property. The
mitigation site is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x
70' in size. This area is bounded on three sides by a
bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain this
mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase the
tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation and plant wetland species in accordance
with the enclosed planting plan. Successful implementation
of NCDOT's mitigation plan at this site will lead to the

creation of 0.16 acres of wetland habitat, as well as the
preservation of approximately 0.80 acres of an existing
bottomland hardwood system.
NCDOT is requesting that the proposed work be authorized
under the appropriate Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
permit. By copy of this letter, we are also requesting
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification from the N.C.
Division of Environmental Management. The U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers has previously authorized this project under
Section 404 Nationwide Permit 23 (Categorical Exclusions).
Included for your information is a permit application, permit
drawings (11 pages) and a mitigation plan. A processing fee
of $250 will be forwarded to your office within the next
week. We would also like to request that copies of any
environmental agency comments supplied to your office during
the review of this application be forwarded to NCDOT. If we
may be of further assistance, or if you require any
additional information, please contact Mr. Doug Huggett of
NCDOT's Environmental Unit at [phone].
Sincerely,
B.J;. 'Quin , P.E.
Assl an. ranch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Mr. Charles Jones, DCM-Morehead City
District Engineer, COE
L-4r. John Dorney, DEM, DEHNR (7 copies)
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., Highway Design Branch
Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. John Smith, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. W.D. Johnson, Roadside Environmental
Mr. D.J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer

Mitigation Summary
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
PROJECT SCOPE
The proposed action involves replacing the existing
bridge with a new structure 130 feet long and 34 feet wide.
The centerline of the replacement structure will be
approximately 7.5 feet east of its existing location.
This minor adjustment to the roadway alignment is necessary
to maintain adequate clearance during the construction period
between the structure and the major water and sewer lines
which parallel the roadway to the west. Approximately 900
feet of approach roadway work will be necessary to
accommodate this slight centerline shift. All widening of
the roadway approaches will occur on the east side of the
existing roadway.
Due to high traffic volumes and the lack of suitable
off-site detour route, traffic will be maintained on-site
during the construction period by providing a temporary
detour on the east side of the existing alignment. The
temporary crossing of Little Northeast Creek will be
accomplished by utilizing four temporary 84" corrugated steel
pipes.
IMPACTS
Due to filling associated with the shifting of the
centerline, 0.13 acres of jurisdictional wetland habitat will
be impacted. The majority of this impact will occur in a
roadside drainage ditch. Fill associated with the temporary
detour will lead to the temporary loss of 0.66 acres of
bottomland hardwood wetland habitat.
MITIGATION
The temporary detour embankment will be removed
following completion of construction, and the disturbed area
restored to its original elevation. Additionally, two small
upland areas exist within the boundaries of the detour (see
sheets 4 of 11 and 5 of 11). These two upland sites total
approximately 0.08 acres in size. Following completion of
construction, these two areas will also be graded to wetland
elevation (approximate elevation 4.5').

NCDOT will also purchase a parcel of land approximately
120 feet east of the existing centerline at station 65+50.
This area is an upland grassy area approximately 100' x 70',
or 0.16 acres in size. This area is bounded on three sides
by a bottomland hardwood wetland system. In order to obtain
this mitigation property, NCDOT is negotiating to purchase
the tract bounded to the west by NCDOT right of way from =Sta
65+50 to the crossing of Little Northeast Creek, to the north
by a line running perpendicular from the centerline at =Sta
65+50 to the bank of Little Northeast Creek, and to the south
and east by Little Northeast Creek. This entire tract is
slightly less than one acre in size. NCDOT will preserve the
existing wetland habitat, and grade down the grassy area to
wetland elevation.
After grading of the sites are completed, wetland tree
species such as overcup oak (Quercus lyrata), swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus michauxii), water oak (Quercus nigra), black gum (Nyssa
sylvatica) water tupelo (Nyssa aquatica) and bald cypress
(Taxodium distichum) will be planted on 8 to 10 foot centers to
compensate for project related wetland impacts. NCDOT proposes to
plant five of the listed species. Species compositions will be
approximately equal. If less than five species are available at
the time of planting, NCDOT will consult with environmental agency
personnel to determine an acceptable course of action. NCDOT will
attempt to obtain one year old seedlings (12-18" tall) with 1/4"
minimum root collar diameter. If possible, all seedlings will be
obtained from suppliers at approximately the same longitude as the
planting site.
MITIGATION PLAN SUMMARY
As proposed, the project will lead to a temporary impact to
0.66 acres of wetland habitat, and the permanent loss of 0.13
acres of wetland habitat. Successful implementation of NCDOT's
mitigation proposal will lead to the restoration of 0.66 acres of
wetland habitat, and the creation of 0.24 acres of wetland habitat
(two 0.04 acre sites within temporary detour route, one 0.16 acre
site just outside of project limits).
The restored and created wetland systems north of Little
Northeast Creek will be in NCDOT permanent right of way, and will
therefore be protected from future development. The restored and
created wetland systems south of Little Northeast Creek do not
occur in permanent NCDOT right of way. However, due to the
exceedingly wet nature of this area, it is unlikely that any
development would obtain the permit authorization required for any
development.
Adjacent Property Owners
Onslow County, SR 1406
Bridge No. 121 over Little Northeast Creek
State Project No. 8.2260401
TIP No. B-2158
Mr. Cecil Morton
910 Elaine Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Mr. Tommy Morton Jr.
Route 2, Box 500
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Mary Venters
Route 2, Box 467
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Ms. Belinda Stephens
611 Linwood Avenue
Durham, NC 27708
Ms. Evelyn White
Route 2, Box 503
Jacksonville, NC 28546
Please type or print. Carefully describe all anticipated
development activities, including construction, excava-
tion, filling, paving, land clearing, and stormwater con-
trol. If the requested information is not relevant to your
project, write N/A (not applicable). Items 1-4 and 8-9
must be completed for all projects.
1 APPLICANT
a. Name NC Dept, of Transportation
Attn: B.J. O'Quinn, Asst. Branch Mgr.
Address pp gnx 292n1
CityRaleigh state NC - d. Describe the planned use of the project.
p 27611 yp Public Transportation
Zi Da hone 919-733-3141
X Landowner or ,_ Authorized agent
b. Project name (if any) SR 1406 Bridge over
Little.N.E. Creek. B-2158
c. If the applicant is not the landowner, also give the
owner's name and address.
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. Street address or secondary road number
SR 1406
b. City, town, community, or landmark
Pinev Green
c. County Onslow
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? No
e. Name of body of water nearest project
Little Northeast Creek
3 DESCRIPTION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. Describe all development activities you propose (for
example, building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead,
or pier). Replace existing bridge and
widen and realign approach road
If you plan to build a marina, also complete and
attach Form DCM-MP-2.
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an
existing project, new work, or both?
Both
c. Will the project be for community, private, or
commercial use?
Public
4 LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract +/- 1.5 acres
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A
c. Elevation of tract above mean sea level or
National Geodetic Vertical Datum
4' NGS 1929
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Muckalee, Marvyn, Goldsboro, Baymead
e. Vegetation on tract Forested Wetlands
f. Man-made features now on tract Roadway and Bridge
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan Classification of
the site? (Consult the local land use plan.)
X Conservation Transitional
Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Not Zoned
i. How are adjacent waters classified?
C
j. Has a professional archaeological survey been
carried out for the tract? No If so, by whom?
3/91 1
5 UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
Complete this section if the project includes any land
development.
a. Type and number of buildings, facilities, or
structuresproposedOne brigde w/ approaches,
one temporary detour
b. Number of lots or parcels N/A
c. Density (Give the number of residential units and the
units per acre.)
d. Size of area to be graded or disturbed
1. 5 acre
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one
acre of land, the Division of Land Resources must
receive an erosion and sedimentation control plan at
least 30 days before land disturbing activity begins.
If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion
control plan been submitted to the Division of Land
Resources? NO
f. Give the percentage of the tract within 75 feet of
mean high water to be covered by impermeable
surfaces, such as pavement, buildings, rooftops.
No net increase after removal of temporary
detour
g. List the materials, such as marl, paver stone, asphalt,
or concrete, to be used for paved surfaces.
asphalt and concrete
h. If applicable, has a stormwater management plan
been submitted to the Division of Environmental
Management? N/A
i. Describe proposed sewage disposal and/or waste
water treA Hent facilities.
j. Have these faci it ees received state or local approval?
k. Describe existing treatment facilities.
N/A
1. Describe location and type of discharges to waters of
the state (for example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down"). surface runoff
m. Water supply source N/A
n. If the project is oceanfront development, describe
the steps that will be taken to maintain established
public beach acc sways or provide new access.
N/A
o. If the project is on the oceanfront, what will be the
elevation above mean sea level of the first habitable
floor? N/A
6 EXCAVATION AND FILL
INFORMATION
a. Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation
or fill activities (excluding bulkheads, which are
covered in Section 7).
Length- Width Depth
Access channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Boat basin
Other (break-
water, pier,
boat ramp,
rock jetty)
Fill placed in
wetland or below Temp .
MHW p
+/ - 470'I +/ - 12.
45'
Upland fill
areas
b. Amount of material to be excavated from
water level in cubic yards
c. Type of material N/A
d. Does the area to be excavated include marshland,
swampss , oor other wetlands?
e. Hi §h ground excavation, in cubic yards
1 0 CY behind existing endbents
3/91
f. Ditia TiT of spoil dis?osal area
up an ispo a ar a not yet determined
g. Location of spoil disposal area upland site not
vet determined
h. Do you claim title to the disposal area? unknown
If not, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
i.
Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? unknown
If so, where?
j. Does the disposal area include any marshland,
swamps, or water areA ?
c. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months, in
feet N/A
d. Type of bulkhead material N/A
e. Amount of fill, in cubic yards tube placed below
mean high water
f. Type of fill material N/A
8 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the follow-
ing items must be submitted:
k. Will the fill material be placed below mean high A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other
water? yes instrument under which the applicant claims title to the
1. Amount of fill in cubic yards 384 CY (temp detour) affected property. If the applicant is not claiming to be
the owner of said property, then forward a copy of the
in. Type of fill material select fill deed or other instrument under which the owner claims
title, plus written permission from the owner to carry out
n. Source of fill material suitable borrow site the project.
o. Will fill material be placed on marsh or other
yes
An accurate work plat (including plan view and cross
wetlands? sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black ink on an 8
D. Dimensions of the wetland to be filled er. (Refer to Coastal Resources
1/2 x 11 white pa
470' avg x 12.5' avg perm. ; 700' avg x 45' avg p
ule 7J.0203 for a detailed description.)
Commission Rule'
(temp)
q. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
and erosion controlled?
Standard NCDOT erosion adn sedimentation
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
control measures prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if 18 high
quality copies are provided by applicant. (Contact the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding that agency's
r. What type of construction equipment will be used use of larger drawings.) A site or location map is a part
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
of plat requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed
dredge)? backhoe, bulldozer to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
site. Include county road (SR) numbers, landmarks, and
s. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment the like.
to project site? no If yes, explain steps that will
be taken to lessen environmental impacts. A stormwater management plan, if applicable, that
may have been developed in consultation with the
Division of Environmental Management.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners. These
individuals have 30 days in which to submit comments
7 SHORELINE STABILIZATION on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management and should be advised by the applicant of
a. Length of bulkhead or riprap N/A that opportunity.
b. Average distance waterward of mean high water or
normal water level N.1 A
3/91
Name
Address
Name
Address
Name
Address
A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources to cover
the costs of processing the application.
A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront
and inlet areas.
A statement on the use of public funds. if the project
involves the expenditure of public funds, attach a state-
ment documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to 10).
9 CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
Any permit issued in response to this application will
allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to conditions and restrictions
contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's ap-
proved Coastal Management Program and will be con-
ducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I further certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in
fact, grant permission to representatives of state and
federal review agencies to enter on the aforementioned
lands in connection with evaluating information related
to this permit application and follow-up monitoring of
project.
This is the ZJ_ day of J ?alJ , 19-D
X
Land own or A thoriz agent
4 3/91
SUMMARY
FILL BELOW
NORMAL WSE FILL IN
WETLAND TOTAL FILL IN
WETLANDS FILL IN
WETLANDS
TEMP. DETOUR
348 CY
4487 CY
4835 CY
0.66 AC
-L- REV. 0 CY 360 CY 360 CY 0.13 AC
TOTAL 348 CY 4847 CY 5195 CY 0.79 AC
VICINITY 114AP
SCALE: I = MILE
N. C. DEPT. OF TRAN5FUH I A I IUN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET ? OF ii , OCT. 1992
I 1
t ?
i II
I
r? I
J f
I
I
0 9 09
I i
?l
?NI1 s
HZ l lvL4
w
cll
J
w
m
Ln
s
N
0

0
ZQ L
Ln
3 Q

J
LL. J
J ?

0
v)
w
o
W z
z
w
0 ;o
Z
o
a
J
d ? ?I
55
a J?
1
S
U ?J I I C
I ?
I
?I
.I
I 1
1
J
w
N
W
Z
w
7

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B - 2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 2 OF JL OCT. 1992

o
r
o
O ?
0
I-
r
I Ij
it If
it I I i!?
1 i t j ? l ! i? Q / O
i '? '' i I I '• W
1 ? l i ; ?I U
!
i
I X I I .?
j
r;

T
S
LL)
_J
J
V ?
l,J
F--
L
W
0
z
rn
u
W
y
Of
c
cn
7
d
J
F--
LLJ
j
J
(j)
W
0
li
0

'v 1
J
O
T

;-i ?:?
?l
li I II ASr
j V6
i ?
Gobi ors i l i ; I. -BNi-j
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 3 OF ?i OCT. 1992
\ i
? I
I
1 I ?
v I I
I
I
I
09 -?
i
I ?'I
I
? I
Q _ J i it
z
q I?
k
I
I ?NII
yw t_l
W
/ z
/ cn
-3
/ Z
I ? W
it
? a I f
y
J
'a w
1 z
? w
r
j I
_ fl 11? 1
i
n
O
J
w
m
J
J
Lz_
0
z
W
0

4 I
N
0
z
a
w
z
J
J
LL-
LA
CC
O
S
c
h?
az
OZ
p_
0
4Y
>
Q
O ?
0
o p
0 0 mod.
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET ? OF t OCT. 1992
c I
i
i
i
\ ` - -77
X ?:`'7? J
FLoc? ? I ? ?? -
2
v
r
Q ?
c?
G
1- J
yl) W
-r
i
? I \I
1 , l? i
C, _ :i
I ~_i _)
w ? 1?
I1J
w 'u.l

J
w -
-? C
C
L
? Lv J
Oq

> Li

W O
S
w
[Y
w

Of wCL
?
C
LLJ

00
J
J
_
IL- < >
w w
cr (.-_I -j
:D Q Lei
Lli O
C LO
O w 7 7
z??y
i
1 ? h i I? i i I
V 3 I i r I I l a
?tj
6 `? I I i I
i ? ! it 1
-? I
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 5 OF ii OCT. 1992

" Op _. q
rv
` t7 G

- J

J
L?,j

-- I
I

I

?n

I i
I
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
O O WETLAND PERMIT
4
SHEET c, OF i OCT. 1992

' L

I/ ??j I I j
? N ~
t
< 17

rv ?< W

< C
I V
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
C
N
.
.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

y;
- ;.
I !
ONSLOW COUNTY
I PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT

SHEET -7 OF t? OCT. 1992

I
I?
. n

-D

r-,
I
fill
?i

I
.I(
I

\?
I
?
I
.
I .I
I
I

n,
I
.
jN

r.
\ \I

?i I, \ I Ii i
\
nl ?.v
I

v?l ,l

I I`\ \\\
J/
1 r l

I ?.
N \ \.\\
\

l L:?
4 ?-
3
- %v
J lu?_
J -
is- -
It-I _
CD ti
'S
CJ
L
II ? +?
L.J v
Ld
I?
- L
L J <f
u- Q
w
LLJ
O C C_
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
WETLAND PERMIT
SHEET 9 OF 11 OCT. 1992
A

QL

li

J
J

0 6
n n /

?J ? Ir I
I
?
v
? I
cn
I
Q
O
I N
I
I ?

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION I
I
I
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
ONSLOW COUNTY
PROJECT: 82260401 B-2158
I
WETLAND PERMIT I
o O
SHEET /a OF OCT. 1992
AFL A 0

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMEs B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
March 11, 1997
Ms. Cyndi Bell
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Ms. Bell:
8EDEIVED
AfQR 2 5 199?
=NViR pN?NTAI ?cENCES
GARLAND B. GARRETT J R.
SECRETARY
The Annual Monitoring Report for the B-2158 mitigation site is attached hereto. The
approximatley 0.9 acre site is located on SR 1406 in Onslow County, near bridge No. 121.
Mitigation involves 0.66 acres of restoration and 0.24 acres of creation. The following
bottomland hardwood trees were planted: Baldcypress, Black Gum, Overcup Oak, Swamp
Chestnut Oak, and Water Oak. Wildlife Resource Commision will check the site at the end of
three years to verify survival of tree seedlings.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] ext. 209.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Planning and Environmental Branch
attachment
t ?
cc: Mr. Charles Jones
N.C. Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Div. of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
Mr. Scott McLendon
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
B-2158 Mitigation Site
Annual Report for 1996
1. Project Description
The site is located north of Little Northeast Creek on SR 1406 near Bridge no. 121 in
Onslow County. This site consists of approximately 0.9 acres of land including 0.66
acres of restoration and 0.24 acres of creation. This site consists of restoration and
creation of the following bottomland hardwood species:
Baldcypress -Taxodium distichum
Black Gum -Nyssa sylvatica
Overcup Oak - Ouercus lyrata
Swamp Chestnut Oak - Ouercus michauxii
Water Oak - Ouercus nigra
II. Project Association
This mitigation project is to offset wetland impacts associated with project B-2158.
III. Project History
December 1994 Site planted
October 1996 Vegetation Monitoring (2yr.)
IV. Success Criteria
0 WRC will check the site at end of three years to verify survival of tree seedlings. ,
V. Results
No monitoring plots were established. However, site inspection revealed that only a few
trees are located around the perimeter of the site. Vehicular traffic has destroyed many of
the .planted trees. Black gum trees are beginning to colonize throughout the site, many 8-
12" in height.
VI. Summary
Areas on both sides of the Little Northeast Creek east of the bridge were graded to
wetland elevation and planted with bottomland hardwood species. There were no plots
established. By visual observation we obtained that less than 25 of the trees planted have
survived, primarily due to traffic accessing the creek. Colonization of black gum is
beginning throughout the site due to adjacent bottomland hardwoods.
VII. Proposed Remedial Action ;
• Continue visual observation to determine rate of natural colonization.
0 Consider blocking off area to prevent vehicles from damaging vegetation.

W

?.STATE?
w
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TPANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201 SECRETARY
January 26, 1998
Ms. Cyndi Bell
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Div. of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Ms. Bell:

????i?•',, ;s',I?JM'r?0.9CIENCES
The Annual Monitoring Report for the B-2158 mitigation site is attached hereto. The
approximatley 0.9 acre site is located on SR 1406 in Onslow County, near bridge No. 121.
Mitigation involves 0.66 acres of restoration and 0.24 acres of creation. The following
bottomland hardwood trees were planted: Baldcypress, Black Gum, Overcup Oak, Swamp
Chestnut Oak, and Water Oak. Wildlife Resource Commision will check the site at the end of
three years to verify survival of tree seedlings.
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone] ext. 209.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Devens, P.E.
Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Planning and Environmental Branch
attachment

cc: Mr. Charles Jones
N.C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Div. of Coastal Management
P.O. Box 769
Morehead City, NC 28557
Mr. Scott McLendon
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
ANNUAL REPORT for 1997
B-2158 Mitigation Site
Onslow County
TIP # B2158
Prepared by:
Permits and Mitigation Unit
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
January 1998
B-2158 Mitigation Site
1. Project Description
The site is located north of Little Northeast Creek on SR 1406 near Bridge No. 121 in
Onslow Co. Approximately 0.9 acres of the land including 0.66 acres of restoration and
0.24 acres of creation consists of the following bottomland hardwood species:
Baldcypress -Taxodium distichum
Black Gum -Nyssa sylvatica
Overcup Oak - Ouercus lyrata
Swamp Chestnut Oak - Ouercus michauxii
Water Oak - Ouercus nigra
II. Project Association
This mitigation project is to offset wetland impacts associated with project B-2158.
III. Project History
December 1994
October 1996
August 1997
IV. Success Criteria
Site planted
Vegetation Monitoring (2yr.)
Vegetation Monitoring (3yr)
WRC will check the site at end of three years to verify survival of tree seedlings.
V. Results
No monitoring plots were established, however site inspection revealed that only a few
trees located around the perimeter of the site were found. Heavy traffic has destroyed
many of the planted trees. Black gum trees were beginning to naturalize throughout the
site, many 8 - 12" height on the north side of the site.
VI. Summary
Areas on both sides of the Little Northeast Creek east of the bridge were graded to
wetland elevation and planted with bottomland hardwood species. There were no plots
established. By visual observation we obtained that less than 25 of the trees planted had
survived, primarily due to traffic accessing the creek. Naturalizing of black gum is
beginning throughout the site due to adjacent bottomland hardwoods. The north side of
the creek is establishing in Black Gum. with a few Oaks scattered throughout the site:
however, the south side of the site continues to be destroyed by boater/fishermen traffic.
VII. Proposed Remedial Action
At this time, NCDOT is investigating a method to deter boater/fishermen traffic that has
destroyed a majority of the tree planting on the south side of the site. The site will be
replanted prior to March 15, 1998 with the same species outlined in the permit.
.,tee o-? A \
B-2158 Wetland Site
as??
17 }Jacksonville
GA
f
PQ?
LL
J
3
17
s?
O
?P Q? QL?? C iFF;
iRS O? ? 0
F
UFFF R CRti FO?'t'6
o 'QigC o RGti
SST
2RR ° ?? ,
Ro?`O
400
`?sO o
o ST m Q \ RAN"
z ?P yG? ?O o bG MARK L
? ?; O G? w p ?,?? ==Q
© 1997 DeLorme.

4
kS-
O
R
lx0
!G
i^
n
l?
'ri
P\?
€
J
sip
ATf .
R°qo ??a? " Sys .? _ ?
cE G ; .aoa
e-
\ ,/ „ ,,`little Ne creek
ti
B-2158 over NE Creek
on SR 1406 near
Jacksonville
W?

i
i ?o
B - 2158
?3 d 1.
r