WQCSD0246_Regional Office Historical File 2006 to 2017

Water Poi pion. Control System Operator .M,,, gnation Form
WPCSOCC
�+ NCAC 15A 8G .0201 ll
Permittee Owner/Officer Name:aG
Mailing Address: 00
City: State: - Zip: r`iCs` - Phone #:
Email address: emu•\�d� `y c� ; i, tYo...\ a
Signature: Date:
Date:
....................... Ir ................ .. . ........ ....................... ...... . ................. .... ?'`G ..... S1:.. .
Facility Name: ' � .,� c Ld ��� G.r CQ��A�6-Permit#: L,
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE SYSTEM!
Facility Tyne/Grade:
Biological WWTP Surface Irrigation
Physical/Chemical Land Application
Collection System
...............................................................................................................
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC)
(rE-IV E D
Division of Water Resources
JUL 2 0 2011
Water Q!aalihf Regional Operations
Asheville Regional Office�� ,
Print Full Name: L.A,.2t� o >
(/�}
1._l7�'
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: Cie 5 6 `: Work Phone #: (R<;)h ) 3, &`+ - 136,1
Signature: Date: i / 0 % e
"[ certitN that I agree to y designation as the Operator in Responsible Charge for die facility noted. I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G .0204 and failing to do so can result in Disciplinary
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
..............................................................................................................................................
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge (BU ORC)
Print Full Name:
Certificate Type / Grade / Number: �,' Z J /&4 Work Phone #: ( ��) C- %p
`?
Signature: ...,�..�r---s=—�r�.�'`` �,% ,---'�"� Date:
"I certitN that I agree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and vdll abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the BU ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G .0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
...............................................................................................................................................
Mail, fax or email the WPCSOCC, 161.8 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1618 Fax: [phone]
original to: Email: certadmin&nedenneov
Mail or fax a copy to the Asheville
Fayetteville
Mooresville
appropriate Regional Office: 2090 US Hwy 70
225 Green St
610 E Center Ave
Swannanoa 28778
Suite 714
Suite 301
Fax: [phone]
Fayetteville 28301-5043
Mooresville 28115
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Washington
Wilmington
Winston-Salem
943 Washington Sq Mall
127 Cardinal Dr
585 Waughtown St
Washington 27889
Wilmington 28405-2845
Winston-Salem 27107
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone]
Raleigh
3800 Barrett Dr
Raleigh 27609
Fax: [phone]
Phone:[phone]
Revised 02-2013

Water Pollution Control System ORC Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC 15A:08G .0201
General Information:
QI...;�y CcvrJTY WATC--tZ U1STR�c-t'
Permittee Owner/Off cer Name: Srt e p f4` +� S e L(.. � �s � � � tan C9 A + Q 1n A "'
Mailing Address:
City. State: A C Zip: Zq9a 9 -
Telephone Number. r 2--
Signature:
Date:
aasaswsswwws�sasswsasasawsaasaass■sari•aaasa■■aawaaaaaaaaaawa■saaasaaaaaa
Facility Information:
Facility: ( T�% LA;i A-,
permit ;ATy�jiyv-s �(r"hN r (>ii CCT+o�i Cis/S'fi �1
Permit Number: \�,' c. ' SD D z L/ Co County: CLAN
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE OF SYSTEM!
Mark MTvne of Facility Class (I — 4)
Wastewater Plant Spray Irrigation —
Ph 'callChemical Land Application
ys1
Collection System Z Subsurface
Class
N/A
N/A
N/A
rawssswswwsaswwsssswsswwswwisssswwsaswwswwwwwaswswssssswussusw■sswwssws
Operator in Responsible Charge:
PrmtName- ba N i c=- c- lane Da k,sG a' Social Security #
CertificateType and Grade: CS -- I Certificate #: cJ 9 5 ig Z4,
Work Telephone: `3Z 3�ci - 13 t- f Signature: % -.
aaasaaaaaaasaass■aaaaas■aasaaaaawaaaaaaaaaaswaaaaaaaaaaswsa■•saaaasaaasaa
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charge:
Print Name: V AzLbg, o u? Social Security # Z Ll 3 -- 5'7 9 `4 5 Z-
Certificate Type and Grade: C S - i Certificate #-- 9 S L 2-0
Work Telephone: ` 1 3S� -13 (D l Sigo :
Mail or Fax to: WPCSOCC_
1618 Mail Service Center m.
Rsteiglh., x c. 27699-1618 FEB 15 2012
F=.- 919/TU-1338
NEATER C?i)AL,TY S:--CTCN
10E
�. .._..,... ,� .. ,•..,..... _." a ..:.«:"e ,.

-�,--" E E CCPY
DE L ..
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Layton Schuh
Clay County Water & Sewer District
P.O. Box 118
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
May 16, 2011
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-2011-DV-0136
Permit No. WQCSD0246
Clay County Water & Sewer District
Clay County W & S Collection System
Clay County
Dear Mr. Shcuh:
A review has been conducted of Clay County Water & Sewer District's self reported Sanitary
Sewer Overflows (SSO's) 5-Day Report submitted by Clay County Water & Sewer District. This review
has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the requirements found in Collection System Permit
WQCSD0246 and/or G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1). The violation that occurred is summarized below.
Area Violation Date Description Violation Type
CSO/SSO (Sewer Overflow) 04/28/2011 Sanitary Sewer Overflow Discharge
t Valid
NOV-2011-DV-0135 <4,000 Gallons Total WithouPermit
Incident# 201100948 April 2011 SSO <1,000 Gallons to Town Creek
Remedial actions should be taken to correct this problem. The Division of Water Quality may
pursue enforcement action for this and any additional violations of State law.
You should address the causes of noncompliance and all actions taken to prevent the recurrence
of similar situations. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Asheville
Regional Staff or Janet Cantwell at 828-296-4500.
If you have any question regarding this policy please contact your Asheville Regional Staff
or Janet Cantwell at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
tgTeC. Edwards
Surface Water Protection Section Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Asheville Region
Cc: DWQ Asheville Files
DWQ Central Files
PERCS Unit
S:\SWP\Clay\Collection Systems\Clay County W&S Collection System\NOV-2011-DV-0135.doc
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION — ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE One
Location: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778 NOf t11Carollina
Phone: [phone]\FAX: [phone]\Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Naturally
Internet: www.ncwaterauality.or

1<`
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee. Freeman
Director Secretary
Governor -
May 11, 2011 r ��
��
la' L y m�,� 12 2 11 ; h
Stephan Sellers
Clay County Water and Sewer Authority wa�E QUALITY SECTION
PO Box 118 aC{_;E IL E REG;rn�A� cir RCE
Hayesville, NC 28904 x,...... ::...
r.«4 AI:..+'.x .... ., -
Subject: System Wide Collection System Permitting
Clay County WASA Collection System
Clay County
Application Number: WQCS00378
Dear Mr. Sellers,
The Asheville Regional Office has determined that the actual, permitted or Division approved average daily
flow for the Clay County WASA collection system is 200,000 gallons per day or over. Therefore, in
accordance with the North Carolina G.S. 143-215.98 and 15 NCAC 2T .0400 you are hereby notified that an
application for coverage of the subject collection system must be submitted. Upon receipt of this letter, your
facility has sixty (60) days to submit an application and all supporting documentation.
This permit is for the operation and maintenance of your collection system. The person responsible for the
wastewater collection system should review and complete this application and review the permit shell. Please
visit our web site to down load the application and draft permit shell at:
http //portal ncdenr ore web/wa/swp/ps/cs/apes
Note the pre -assigned application number in the subject heading. Please reference this number in any collection
correspondence, including Sanitary Sewer
system Overflow (SSO) reporting. This number will become your
permit number upon permit issuance. The previous tracking number, WQCSD0246, is now inactive.
The original application, signed by an authorized signing official, one copy of the signed
application
mad twterialo
copies of any attachments must be returned to complete the application package (i. application
submitted in duplicate). The complete package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Pretreatment, Emergency Response &Collection System Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

It is very important that you respond to this request within the time frame provided. If you any problems down
loading the application or draft permit or have any other questions regarding this matter please contact Deborah'
Gore at [phone] [email: [e-mail]]. You may also contact Don Price with the
Asheville Regional Office at [phone] [email: [e-mail]].
Sincerely,
Deborah Gore
PERCS Unit Supervisor
Cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
Don Price, Asheville Regional Office

ULAY COUNTY
P.O. Box 118 Hayesville, North Carolina 28904 [phone]

PFILE CCPY
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 29, 2011
Mr. Layton Schuh
Clay County Water & Sewer District
PO Box 118
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
SUBJECT: Collection System Inspection
Clay County Water & SewerDistrict
Permit No: WQCSD0246
Clay County
Dear Mr. Schuh:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Collection System Inspection conducted on
March 3, 2011. Currently the waste water treatment plant and collection system is
obligated to provide treatment to a volume of wastewater in excess of its design
(permitted) capacity. Due to this, the facility has plans to upgrade to a 0.64 MGD plant
and an expansion phase limit has been added to the current NPDES permit. The
Asheville Regional Office strongly supports the Clay County Water and Sewer District's
endeavors to secure funding for this project.
The facility appeared to be in Compliance with permit WQCSD0246.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and
comments. If you or your staff have any questions, please call me at 828-296-4500.
Sincer*hzel
Jeff M
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
cc: Bryan Lance, ORC
Central Files
Asheville Files
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION — ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE ne
Location: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778� NOonAhCaro ina
Phone: [phone]\FAX: [phone]\Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Nativrallrf
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org S:\SWP\Clay\Collection Systems\Clay County W&S Collection System\CEI 2011.doc

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCSD0246 Effective: 02/02/07 Expiration: Owner: Clay County Water & Sewer District
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Clay County Water & Sewer District
County: Clay
Region: Asheville
Contact Person: Michael C Anderson Title: County Manager
Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/02/2011 Entry Time: 12:00 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM
��� Phone: [phone]
Primary inspector: Jeff Menzel `2�UC_._
Secondary Inspector(s): /
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Deemed permitted collection system management and
operation
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Monitoring & Rpting
0 Miscellaneous Questions M Operation & Maint Reqmts ® Records Regmts
Inspections ■ Pump Station
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: WQCSD0246 Owner - Facility: Clay County Water & Sewer District
Inspection Date: 03/02/2011 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary: t
This sewer system consists of six pump stations and approximately 25 miles of gravity and force mains constructed of a
variety of materials.
In 2003 an inflow and infiltration study was done by McGill and Associates documenting sources of extra water making its
way into the system. Currently the district is planning a grant to the NC Rural Center to help formulate a Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP).
Currently the waste water treatment plant is obligated to provide treatment to a volume of wastewater in excess of its
design (permitted) capacity. The current WWTP has a design capacity of 0.3 MGD. The most recent flow tracking form
indicates the obligated flow to be above 0.3 MGD. The actual average flow is below 0.1 MGD. Due to this, the facility has
plans to upgrade to a 0.64 MGD plant and an expansion phase limit has been added to the current NPDES permit. The
Asheville Regional Office strongly supports the Clay County Water and Sewer District's endeavors to secure funding for
this project.
Page: 2

Permit: WQCSD0246 owner - Facility: Clay County Water & Sewer District
Inspection Date: 03/02/2011 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Inspections
■❑❑❑
Are maintenance records for sewer lines available?
Are records available that document pump station inspections?
Are SCADA or telemetry equipped pump stations inspected at least once a week?
❑ ❑ ❑
Are non-SCADA/telemetry equipped pump stations inspected every day?
■
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records available that document citizen complaints?
# Do you have a system to conduct an annual observation of entire system?
# Has there been an observation of remote areas in the last year?
Are records available that document inspections of high -priority lines?
Has there been visual inspections of high -priority lines in last six months?
Comment: The system is observed while clearing of the sewer right of way.
Yes No NA NE
Operation & Maintenance Requirements
Are all log books available?
Does supervisor review all log books on a regular basis?
Does the supervisor have plans to address documented short-term problem areas?
What is the schedule for reviewing inspection, maintenance, & operations logs and problem areas?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are maintenance records for equipment available?
Is a schedule maintained for testing emergency/standby equipment?
weekly/monthly
What is the schedule for testing emergency/standby equipment?
Do pump station logs include:
■❑❑❑
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
■❑❑❑
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Is there at least one spare pump for each pump station w/o pump reliability?
Are maintenance records for right-of-ways available?
❑❑❑
Are right-of-ways currently accessible in the event of an emergency?
■
■❑❑❑
Are system cleaning records available?
Has at least 10% of system been cleaned annually?
Page: 3

X
Permit: WQCSD0246 Owner - Facility: Clay County Water & Sewer District
Inspection Date: 0310212011 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
What areas are scheduled for cleaning in the next 12 months?
Currently the system only has half the amount of replacement pumps for the pump stations. There are 6
pump stations on the collection system.
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available?
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers
Response time
Equipment list and spare parts inventory
Access to cleaning equipment
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
Source of emergency funds
Site sanitation and cleanup materials
Post-overflow/spill assessment
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel?
Is the spare parts inventory adequate?
Comment:
Records
Are adequate records of all SSOs, spills and complaints available?
Are records of SSOs that are under the reportable threshold available?
Do spill records indicate repeated overflows (2 or more in 12 months) at same location?
If yes, is there a corrective action plan?
Is a map of the system available?
Does the map include:
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Number of service taps
Pump stations and capacity
If no, what percent is complete?
Yes No NA NE
■❑❑❑
■❑❑❑
13000
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■❑❑❑
Page: 4

r
Permit: WQCSD0246 Owner - Facility: Clay County Water & Sewer District
Inspection Date: 03/02/2011 Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Reason for Visit: Routine
List any modifications and extensions that need to be added to the map
Clay County has a good sewer map which does not include the number of service taps.
■❑❑❑
# Does the permittee have a copy of their permit?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
Are copies of required press releases and distribution lists available?
Are public notices and proof of publication available?
# Is an annual report being prepared in accordance with G.S. 143-215.1 C?
# Is permittee compliant with all compliance schedules in the permits?
If no, which one(s)?
Comment:
Page: 5

R
0
0
moils
.AAA
4 + +
7&
1.0,21
Rt"
2
E 2c
18
X
rc
ca
42
E E
E
Is
Etta
5;
asill
G. 13
aim I
C', 1* C,
00Ct
CA
0
CON
E
ISO
W6
0
to
No
at
4D
CD
ca
42
E
0
le
0
'a
0
Z's
.5
co
G;
ca
42
C2
-.J� �n 3 r-
cl� m
L

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
March 26, 2010
Mr. Layton Schuh
Clay County Water & Sewer
Post Office Box 838
Haynesville, NC 28904
Subject: Gravity Sever Permitting/Flow Allocations
Clay County Water & Sewer
NPDES Permit NCO026697
Clay County, NC
Dear Mr. Schuh:
Staff of the Asheville Regional Office has reviewed the information, which you provided
to us, regarding the Clay County Water and Sewer District waste water now allocations. While
we have no objections to reallocating flow from some of the un-built projects so you can
accommodate the proposed connection of the Jackrabbit Campground and Truitt Baptist Camp, it
is a concern that the WWTP over allocated on paper. As a means to prevent further over
allocation, it is the intent of this Office to not issue any additional collection system permits until
the time that Clay County Water & Sewer convinces DWQ that the problem has been adequately
addressed.
Possible ways to alleviate this issue would be to expedite the planned expansion of the
WWTP, or to further reallocate all currently permitted gravity sewer systems which have not
been completed, or those which have no plans for further development in the near future.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Keith
Haynes or me at 828-296-4500.
Sincerely,
41-1
RogC.er . Edwards, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION — ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE One
Location: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 NOr thCarolina
Phone: [phone]M FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 aturall�
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
,):xti"1Xz tG,4 44111:4al l# i}i'Svillc \N l 7l3ii {.i
3'Irt`i4�.l.)i.:

Davis, Roy
From: Davis, Roy
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 1:29 PM
To: Gore, Deborah
Cc: Edwards, Roger; Haynes, Keith; Davis, Roy
Subject: Over Obligated WWTPs
Deborah: How are you this afternoon? Clay County Water and Sewer Authority (CCWSA) is the only WWTP, to my
knowledge, which is obligated to provide treatment to a volume of wastewater in excess of its design (permitted)
capacity. This is not a recent development. CCWSA has a WWTP with a design capacity of 0.3 MGD. The most recent
flow tracking form indicates the actual and obligated flow to be 0.354 MGD. Actual flow is 0.098 MGD. The greater
portion of that obligation is to National Investments which is in foreclosure. CCWSA is attempting to expand the plant to
0.64 MGD. Given National Investments situation I would be surprised if problems develop relating to violations of permit
flow limits. Please let me know if this is not the information you require. Roy Davis
Roy Davis - Roy. Davis 2ncdenr.gov
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 U.S. 70 Highway .
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Notice: E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties.
1

iy County -;
Subject: Clay County
From: Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:54:53 -0400
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], Janet Cantwell
<[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
Layton Schuh with Clay County Water and Sewer Authority left me a voice mail message saying that
the Authority had received a $500,000 Rural Water grant for a $1,000,000 WWTP expansion. The
Authority contracted with McGill for plans preparation and construction supervision. Final plans are
expected by November of this year. Roy
Roy Davis - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Roy Davis <Roy.DavisAncmail.net>
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
10/20/2008 9:55 AM
1 of 1

F!Y 2007-2008
(July 1, 2007 - June 30, 2008)
General Information:
Facility/ System Name:
Responsible Entity:
Persons in Charge:
Applicable Permits:
`. j
Water and
28 203
WP,TT-lam
Performance Annual Report
Clay County Wastewater Treatment Plant and Sewer Collection System
Clay County Water and Sewer District
Jeffery Kimsey (Wastewater Treatment), Bryan Lance (Sewer Collection)
P.O. Box 838, Hayesville, NC 28904
NPDES — NCO026697 (Wastewater Treatment) t ��
NPDES — WQCSD0246 (Sewer Collection System) ---� ,
Description of Wastewater Treatment Process and Sewer Collection System:
The Wastewater Treatment Plant is a 300,000 gallon per day, activated sludge facility. Solids are
settled out and clear water is treated with chlorine and then the chlorine residual is removed with
sulfur dioxide before the clear water is discharged to the Hiawassee River. The Sewer Collection System
consists of 6 sewage pump stations and approximately 25 miles of 8 and 10 inch gravity sewer mains and 4, 6
and 8 inch force mains constructed of a variety of materials.
Performance:
The Wastewater Treatment Plant's performance appeared to be satisfactory and in compliance for the
fiscal year 2007-2008, July 2007 thru June 2008. The Sewer Collection System experienced no sanitary sewer
overflows.
List (by month) any violations of permit conditions or other environmental regulations. Monthly lists
should include discussion of any environmental impacts and corrective measures taken to address
violations:
None.
Notification:
The Clay County Water and Sewer District will notified its customers by U.S. Postal Service that a copy
of this Performance Report is available for review and copies are also available in the Business Office, located
at 33 Main Street, Hayesville, NC.
Certification:
I certify under penalty of law that this report is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I
further certify that this report has been made available to the user or customers of the named system and that
those users have been notified of its availability.
Clay County Water and Sewer District: W
Date: �!
Responsible Person (ORC Wastewater Treatment Plant) : _ Date: 7-- � ` c:" �
Responsible Person (ORC Sewer Collection System):
Responsible Person (Director, Clay County Water and Sewer):_.. Date: 7- /-

i�lay County -
Water & Sewer Distn'd
33 iin Street .€ . Box 838
14ayesville, North C ol� 2890
.828 3 9-135 . °°* 1` . 82 3 _ 4,3' 1
February 6, 2008
Mr. Roger C. Edwards, Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
2080 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28788
Subject: Episcopal Church -Sewer Project
Deerfield Inn -Sewer Project
U.S. Hwy 64 Bypass and NC Hwy 69 Business District -Sewer Projects
Surplus Capacity -Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No. NCO026697
Clay County Water and Sewer District
Dear Mr. Edwards:
In accordance with my recent conversations with Mr. Roy Davis of your office, I am forwarding
this letter requesting your consideration to approve the above -mentioned sewer projects based on the
following updated information.
Since receiving the Director's April 13, 2007 letter that outlined DWQ's position on sewage
allocations made and the wastewater treatment plant surplus capacity the following action has been
taken by the Clay County Water and Sewer District:
1. Have made application and have received a modified
NPDES permit to expand WWT from 0.300 MGD to
0.640 MGD.
2. Have contracted with McGill Associates to project
sewage flow and build out schedule of current and
future sewer projects. Based on their projections and
the recent turn down of the local economy, the existing
capacity of the wastewater plant would probaly not be
exceeded until 2010-2012. 2007 average daily WWT
effluent flow was 0.098 MGD.

lication with the
0.300 MGD to
�imum grant
r r— to be awarded
-th an expected
Therefore, based on the information provided, the Clay County Water and Sewer District feels
that it has the wastewater treatment capacity in the short term to provide additional, limited sewage
allocations and is requesting your Department's approval of the above mentioned projects if the
appropriate Fast -Tract permit applications are filed.
If you have questions please contact me at 828 389-8010.
Sincerely,
yton Schuh
Director Clay County Water and Sewer District
cc: Roy Davis, Asheville Regional Office-DWQ
Herbert Cheeks, Chairman Clay County Water and Sewer District Board
Paul Leek, Clay County Manager
Mike Dowd, McGill Associates

,la County....Y
Sewer District.:"� � � �
Water &�-
33 Main Street * P.O. Box 838 OCT 1 r « n }
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
[phone] * fax: [phone]�
October 8, 2007
Roger C. Edwards
Surface Water Protection Section
N.C. Division of Water Quality
2090 US Hwy 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Subject: Privately -owned Collection Systems
And Privately -owned Pump Stations
Clay County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
ASF-EV LLC
This letter is in response to your recent request for information regarding privately -owned sewer
collections systems and pump stations that are connected to the Clay County Water and Sewer District's
Sewer Collection System.
Privately -Owned Pump Stations Connected to Clay Co. Water and Sewer District
1. Ridges at Mountain Harbor -Phase 1, National Investments, LLC
Permit No. W OOQ 31202 _
100 Mountain Harbor Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904
Eddy A. Corn
Newly constructed, placed into service 2007 NG 6'
No complaints received A 1,10,(-'
2. Ridges at Mountain Harbor -Phase 2, National Investments, LLC
Permit No. WQ0031941
100 Mountain Harbor Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904
Joe Milo
Under construction
No complaints received
3. The Pinnacle at Mountain Harbor -Phase 1, National Investments, LLC
Permit No. WQ0032183
100 Mountain Harbor Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904
Scotty Fain
Under construction
No complaints received
4. Living Word Revival Center
Permit No. WQ0030524
1762 Hwy 64 East, Hayesville, NC 28904
Valerie E. Swisher
Newly constructed, placed into service 2007
No complaints received
e y
A'lfx .5�-,`iW<lt�1

Southern Properties Group
Permit No. WQ0030951
3346 Hwy 64 East, Hayesville, NC 28904
Nelson Hendrikse
Newly constructed, placed into service 2007
No complaints received
6. Timberlake Residential Home Builders
Permit No. WQ0031251
260 Rivers Edge Drive, Hayesville, NC 28904
Elise Davis
Under construction
No complaints received
7. Newell Hogsed
162 Hwy 64 Business, Hayesville, NC 28904
Jack Moody (Red Jack, Inc.)
Under construction
No complaints received
If you have any questions please contact me at 828 389-8010.
Sincerely,
Cl"
LayEbn Schuh
Director, Clay County Water and Sewer

Subject: Re: Clay Co.
From: Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:37:08 -0400
To: [e-mail], [e-mail], Roger Edwards
<[e-mail]>, Roy Davis <[e-mail]>
Mike: I have forwarded your population projections for Clay County to Jim Reid for
his review. We came away from our April 30, 2007 meeting thinking that we would
receive an evaluation from Clay County as to whether or not any of our recent
Fast -Track permits approved the same volume of wastewater more than once. We would
still like to see that evaluation. Thanks, Roy Davis
Mike Dowd wrote:
Here it is Roy, sorry for the confusion.
Mike Dowd, P.E.
McGill Associates, P.A.
[phone]
[phone] - fax
www.mcgz leng neers com
-----Original Message -----
From: Roy Davis [mai to Roy Davis@ncma 1 netl Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:30
PM
To: miked@mc illen9 in . ....._..............
Subject: Re: Clay Co.
Mike: I did not receive your earlier E-mail. Roy
Mike Dowd wrote:
Roy ,
I don't know if you've had time to review the flow and pop. figures we e-mailed
you earlier but the District is getting a lot of pressure from the developers
of The Ridges about the permit that's being held by your office. Layton and I
would like to see about meeting with you to talk about what we can do to get
this project released. we are moving as fast as we can with the NPDES permit
modification and alternatives analysis but I doubt the District will be able to
hold off this developer until we get through the permit modification process.
Layton has told me he's amenable to coming to Asheville to meet so let me know
what your schedule will allow and I'll pass the word to Layton .
Thanks,
Mike Dowd, P.E.
McGill Associates, P.A.
[phone]
[phone] - fax
wwva.mcgillengineers.com
1 of 2
6/12/2007 2:41 PM

""J
Roy Davis - [e-mail]
North Carolina Dept. -of -Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Roy Davis <Rov . D a v i s&�v in c �ma ij It. n�e t >
NC DENR - Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Water Quality Section
6/12/2007 2:41 PM
2 of 2

abject: RE: Clay Co.
'From: "Mike Dowd" <[e-mail]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:33:24 -0400
To: "'Roy Davis"' <[e-mail]>
Here it is Roy, sorry for the confusion.
Mike Dowd, P.E.
McGill Associates, P.A.
[phone]
[phone] - fax
www.mcgillenaineers.com
-----original Message -----
From: Roy Davis [mailto_Roy.DavisCncmail_net]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:30 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Clay Co.
Mike: I did not receive your earlier E-mail. Roy
Mike Dowd wrote:
Roy ,
I don't know if you've had time to review the flow and pop. figures we
e-mailed you earlier but the District is getting a lot of pressure
from the developers of The Ridges about the permit that's being held
by your office. Layton and I would like to see about meeting with you
to talk about what we can do to get this project released. We are
moving as fast as we can with the NPDES permit modification and
alternatives analysis but I doubt the District will be able to hold
off this developer until we get through the permit modification process.
Layton has told me he's amenable to coming to Asheville to meet so let
me know what your schedule will allow and I'll pass the word to Layton
Thanks,
Mike Dowd, P.E.
McGill Associates, P.A.
[phone]
[phone] - fax
www.mcgillengineers.cozn
Roy Davis - Roy. Day i @ncinail.net
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional office
Division of Water Quality Water Quality Section
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Clay County WWTP Expansion - flow projections.pdf. i.. Content -Type: application/p
df
6/12/2007 2:37 PM
1 of 2

June 1, 2007
RE: CLAY COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION STUDY
Preliminary Flow Projections through 2027
Current Population and Flows
The Clay County Water and Sewer District currently provides sewer service to approximately 500
residential and 130 commercial customers in and around Hayesville, North Carolina. Billing
statements and reports from the treatment plant showed a flow rateapproximately
o 1,OOr ximatelyPD than
between April 2002 and July 2005, meaning that the plant treated pp Y
what was tracked by the district for billing purposes (billed 55,140 GPD, treated 56,6
50 GPD).
According to the District, the flow meter(s) located at the treatment plant were calibrated during the
summer of 2005. After the calibration, this discrepancy increased from 2.7% to 47.7%. Therefore, the
plant is treating nearly 30,000 GPD more than the District currently estimates from water usage records
(billed 61,021 GPD, treated 90,154 GPD from August 2005 to August 2006). This indicates either a
significant infiltration and inflow (I & 1) problem or the presence of more connections on the District's
sewer system than are currently metered. For the purpose of this report, we will consider the average
daily now of 90,154 GPD the "current" now condition.
Residential and Commercial Growth
Using U.S. Census and North Carolina Demographics population figures for Clay County, it was
determined that the County population has been experiencing an increase of approximately 2.1 %
annually. The population of Hayesville, however, had only increased 1.25% annually from 2000 to
2005. Due to the fact that most residential sewer customers are in the Hayesville area, we expect the
population to follow the 1.25% annual trend and result in 642 customers by 2027. This is in addition to
large proposed developments in the area which are expected to draw a more significant influx of part-
time residents but have already been granted flow allocations.
The increase in the number of commercial customers from April 2002 to August 2006 can be modeled
as linear with acceptable confidence. Using the linear trend, we expect commercial customers to
increase from 129 in August 2006 to approximately 302 by December 2027. This calculation was
based strictly on the actual increase in commercial ustomers from 2002 to 2006, and does not regard
limitations on commercial growth such as geography.
Flow Allocations
The District has allocated a total of 415,440 GPD as of February 2007 to a variety of residential and
commercial developments (as mentioned in the previous section), none of which have yet completed
construction. For the purpose of this document and considering that no formal time frame has been
estimated for the completion of allocated projects, now allocations will be added to the final projected
2027 flows.

Flow Projections
2006, customers on
Based on District billing records for the period between April UOOe for 73.4%ugustof billable monthly flow
non-residential billing rates (commercial, industrial, etc.) acco
on average. Applying this percentage to the post-calibrationof commercial 005v06accounts during that
average daily flows
measured at the treatment plant and the average number
period yields 542 GPD per account. 302 projected commercial customers by 2027 therefore results in
163,684 GPD estimated flow.
Attributing the remaining current flow rate (23,981 GPD) to the estimated 4 residential
users
residential n 006
results in a usage of 49 GPD per capita. By 2027, we project 642
users aily
flow rate of 31,458 GPD.
Commercial and residential projections along with flow allocations total 610,582 GPD by 2027.

Michael F. Easley, Governor
y William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
t r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SURFACE WATER PROTECTIONFF 1 L
April 20, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED — 7006 2150 0005 2459 5656
Ms. Cheryl J. Stack, Project Manager
National Investments, LLC
Post Office Box 293
Hiawassee, Georgia 30546
Subject: Fast -Track Permit Application Return
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor (Phase 11)
Clay County
Dear Ms. Stack:
In accordance with your letter request dated April 3, 2007 and instructions from the
Director of The Division of Water Quality dated April 13, 2007, 1 am returning your
Fast -Track Permit Application dated March 20, 2007. Our concerns are presented in the
Director's April 13, 2007 letter to Mr. Stephen Sellers, Chairman of the Clay County Water
& Sewer District. I may be reached of [phone] should you wish to discuss this
matter.
Sincerely,
Roy M. Davis
Environmental Engineer
cc: Stephen Sellers, Clay County Water & Sewer District
Layton Schuh, Clay County Water & Sewer District
T. Dean Haney, PE
Ridges at Mtn. Harbor Applic. Return
NZhCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

D ��m
.� aaa
o a c c
CD
Ci
rt rt rt
W O O O O
C
O (D(D CD
O — �_ �_ O
Q CDO
CU v CO
+'+.)
CD O CD CD O
N
CS O O O Cn
CD > �•.
m =3 CD
� o O
m < o o 0
N ID O O CD
O N 4 O Q ZJf
Cn o co - D
m
cr
'v m o
(D Cn D CD rt
5-0 O N O
3 Cn
�. C C
O O
y Cn
Cn Cn
NCD
- rt
C/CDi CD
N r
C
O
r C
� rF
0
CZ
o
:�
a0
O
(n
�v
N y
�_
vn
C N O cn CD N C� CA
C- N O N O A
-O CA O O O 0
3 �
v
O O CO O
N
(p
[P
IZ
v
O
Cn
O
0
O
G)
'D
7
Cn
'O
CD
n
CD
m
a
pQpp
p
pC)fJ
p
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v00L
--
o
0
0
C
0
0
C
N
N
N
C4
Cfl
CO
OD
N
co
O
Ul
0
W
CD
N
CS7
•P
x
3
n
3
CS
C
(n
0
O
CD
O
N
rt
CD
CD
Cn
�
�
CD
M
g_
O
�
_
O
C
�
3
(D
0
o
O
C
S0
0
CD
CTI
rt
T
V
p
cn
c
3
CAD
o
'a�'
mC
m
=
a-
'a
n
o
O0
G
v
CD
CL
CD
_
CD
O7
a.
O
0
N
N
N
N
IVCD
N
N
N
N
N
O�
O�
CT
CA
m
O
CA
O
0)
M
O jC-
> � CP 0jTjw 41 N) co --4- m
0) O O W O O N O N O
Cn O O cn O O O O Cn O
����ee000000�
N
N
Ui
Co
Cl
CDO
3-
O
W
W
cn
--
o
O
N
O
CD
co
N
O
CS7
�I
O'
O
N
al
O
O
O
C1 N
J
h
0
C
G O
CD j
O
o
- C Cn
O o CD
-*
00 Cn
N
it
3 �
O
3 (D
OC
CD CD
y
:3Cn
r
C
O
p
y
o
91
C )
O
m v�
CD
CD
N
C(n
�
3 m
Q
p
7 p
CD 3
N y
C
Q- I I
CCD n
C L E
7
O W
COn Q
O O
(7
N O
O
Q
CD
OC
CD
O
CD
C O
a
o 3
C SZ
N 7
3
cc) rr
O�
N
Z
6f
CD
v
CD
U!
U)
C
C
rV
n
O
C
O
G
CD
Q
CD
\V
"S
v
r
0'
.n
O
D_
O
0
2)
O
ch
`i

Mv
W
U'i
MCCP
WC
NC
N
0
N
v
(JTJfJpfJIJfJ(JfJ
G<<
c
m
00000000o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Z
O(O
m
-
(D
C
a
D
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
3_
v
N
jO
N
Cfl
cn
CO
Cn
(0
O
00
NN
00
U7
NJ
O
�I
(D
3
CD
N
Cn
-91
N
O
?
W
-
-�c�c�aomc�c>�zzm
3
CD
cn
cn
C)
Cl)
I
[7
`°CC
_
CD
CD
N
OOO
<3
(p
T.
(D
Q
O
(D
T,n
O
fnO
K
O
Q
'Z
G
O
CND
C<
CD
CD
N
3
(D
Oi
<
(D
�'
v
(D
C
N
O-
(D
v
3
��3
'O
O
-O
o`QoL
m
<
-n
O
p3j
(D
3
D
CDo
C)
-I
W
om
ED
CD
°�"oZ)CDCDCDCD
m
cm
o
3
Dm
m
mT
o
�
�o
CD
3
CD
N
-V
o
r
N
N°
L7Wo
(n*
"0
moo
n
D
n
3
m
m
QO
`D
n-n�
C)
o
<03.
3
3�
`2
*
N
(Q
0
(p
Q
N
cD
Tl
00-1--•-00
O
O
O
O
O�
A�
0
n`<`<
n
O
�2
N
�
O
ZZK.
C
C
Z
C7
AcOOO
0C
N
N
-0�
C+)G)
3
W
��
W
o
665
O0
-
3N
O
0
0
0
0
0
0OO(D
W
p
�0
m
00
.0
W
O
CD
N
C
CDN
C.
<
O
ON
<)
W
W
v
.p
N
M
U7
N
O)
L7
N
N
O
W,
�.:
a1
C+•�
N
O
O
O
O)
O
0
O
CD
O
W
W
N
CD
O
CD
(T
N
W
C)N
v
Cn
CD
"0
—
O
�2
.'-'-.
(D
_p
o
_p-'
0
00"'
W
00
O
O
O
O
CD
W
C:)`<
'+-
v
'-.
`�
O
CDCn
O
00
O
Ul
O—
a.
o
0
0'.
o
:3
Ul
�l
O
6
cn
U)
U)
zy
CD
T
�
G P
o
v
o
a
O
0
o
C:)o
0
o
C:)o
O
c
o
m
o
au
W
�I
N
00
v
�
G
0
O
O
W
to
U7
M
ti
U7
M
p
o
O
CD
O
Cn
O
o
CDN
0
0
O
0
N
Cn
0
O
0
(D
0000OO0000
G)
�
�
7\
�
p
O
7
rt
r
3
d
CD
rt
U)
O
(D
>
O
3
!1
rt
I
O
I
N
m
n
0
m
—
CD

APR 2 7 2007
ASL WATER QUALITY SECTION
Ht:VILLE "'IFFICE
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PHASE I SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
for
THE RIDGES at MOUNTAIN HARBOR
CLAY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
December, 2006
T. D. Haney
Consulting Engineers, PA
69 JAIII16 VJe4 IZ9ad
Nmg&r, Na4i Ca ohm 28701
[phone]
P R 0 J E C T
I L E

PROJECT NAME -
PROJECT #
AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
Phase [ Sewer System improvements
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
03-102.03
FACILITY TYPES k7esiJcnt1A Subdivision
Type Unit No. Units
GallonslUnit
Average Daily
Flow (gpd)
Average Daily
Flow (gpm)
1?esidence 100
�60
36,000
25
Club House (Members) 250
60
15,000
10
Total Daily Tow
I51,000
35

PROJECT NAME- Phase I Sewer System Improvements
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
PROJECT # 03-102.03
PUMP DESIGN- TOTAL AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
Club House PS
FACILITY TYPES
residential Subdivtstan
Average Daily
Average Daily
:T:ype:Unit:;;TNo.
Gallons/Unit
Flow igP�
Flow (gprn)
residence {phase l)
360
7,200
5
8
K'esidence C lute)
3060
10,800
10
Club 4 lwse C Members)
2�0 60
15,000
Ucklog #1 PS
Average Daily Average Daily
Type Unit
No. Units
Gallons/Unit
Flow (gpd Flow (g m)
residence {phase l)
30
55
115
1
360
�60
360
53.000
10,800 8
12,600 9
41,400 29
33,000 23
residence C f use)
pesidence {phase Ill -pinnacle)
Licklog #2 PS
1-PiV,L, , , t ■ r a-w
- -_ -
-
Average Daily
Average Daily
Type Unit
No. Units GailonsiUnif
Float {gam
Fly gpm
ce {phase l)
!© 560
3,600
3
6
25 MO
9,000
# 1 p5
! 97,800
97,800
68
Total Daily Flow
i 11v,400
77
J AA
� .7L

SEWER PUMP DESIGN
PROJECT NAME- The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
PROJECT # t)3102 03
PUMP STATION NAME - Club House
AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
Units
Average Daffy
GaitonsJlinit20
Average Daily
Min. Pump
ETypeUnkhNo-
hC1
,ry
Flow
33,000
23
57
;Pump Design Flow
2.5
Times Average Dialy Flow
ACTUAL PUMP DESIGN 80 9Pm
PUMP CYCLE TIME
Q (Rorer) = 50 9pm
i��5 ft
L (Length) _ in
d (Diameter) = 100 Ham Williams
C (Friction Coefficient) _
Hf = 0.002083 X L X (1C&C}^185,
X
(Q^1.85ld^4.86W
-Pump
50 ft
tiff Elevation =
-10}
1435 ft
High Point in Line =
He (Elevation Head) =
5 ft
Q
Hf
He
TDH
75
11.36
5
16
go
12 80
5
1$
85
14.32
5L
19
Design Flow= 8o gPm
18 ft
OPERATING CONDITIONS - so gAm 0-18• To"

SERIES
TCHMM DATA
3T 1% P GFJNDER
� n �
L3Glilt
HORSEPOWER: $HPg$ PLATE
$ERVIC FACTOR:
12
NEC LOCKfD ROTOR CODE:
MAXIMUM KW "M
I ELLER IA 'MS; € P-ml STANDARD
5 t. �' � � � �� n�} :.
1 P � if, • , i �� � a�� - k> <�< ' �`��;
$ W t 184€�,� 1
i E E>
33i3 icsJ�; fitY i i z .» �i 1 i
.-k"i.�lF-W;IR

PROJECT NAME -
PROJECT #
PUMP STATION NAME
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
A3-102.03
WET WELL FLOATATION CALCULATIONS
Club House
Fiberglass Wt. =
75 lbstef
Concrete M. =
150 Ibslcf
Earth Overburden Wt_ =
45 ibs/c€
Water Wt. =
62.4 lbs/cf
(A.)
Inside Diameter =
46. in.
Volume per foot of wall height
Inside Diameter =
4 ft.
= Outside Dia. Area - Inside Dia. Area
Wall Thickness =
0,!! in.
= 0.53 cu.ft.
Outside Diameter =
49 in.
Outside Diameter =
4.1 ft.
Weight of Manhole per foot of wall height
= Volumn per foot of wall height X fiberglass Wt.
= 40 ibs/ft
Weight of Water per foot of wall height = Inside Dia. Area X Water Wt.
784 lbs/ft
(C.)
USE WITH CONCRETE BASE SECTION
Extended Base Dia. = 7 ft.
Extended Base Area = 58.47 sq. ft. volume of base = Extended Base Area X Base Thickness
= 38.47 cu. ft.
Base Thickness = 12 in.
Base Thickness = 1 ft. Weight of base = Volume of Base X Concrete Wt.
5770 lbs.
Earth Overburden Area = Extended Base Area - Outside Dia. Area
2,38 sq. ft_
Earth Overburden Weight per foot of depth = Earth Overburden Area X Earth Overburden Wt.
1142 lbsift
Top Elev.
lnvt. Elev.
Depth
Wt. Riser
W;770Base*
Earth ©verburden
Wt.**
Total Wt.
Water Wt.
Add.
Concrete Wt.
103g
1E?Z8
7
278
7994
14Q411
7837
T -6203
* Use Section B with Standard Manhole Section or Section C with Extended Base Section
— Add Earth Overburden only with Extended Base Manholes

PROJECT NAME -
PROJECT I
PUMP STATION NAME -
AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
PHASE 1 SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
Clay County, North Carolina
SEWER PUMP DESIGN
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
03402.03
Licklog #1
FACILITY TYPES
ies�denti 5�d►vts
Type Unit
No. Units
Gallons/Unit
Average Daily
Flow (gpd)
Average Daly
Flow (gpm)
Min. Pump
Design Flow"
30
iy0
3b0
360
10,800
54,000
$
38
19
94
�emdence (Phase I)
Kemdence (future)
Club Horse P5
1
33,000
33,000
23
57
ToWat Daily Flow
1
97,800
68
170
'Pump Design Flow 2.5 Tunes Average Dialy Flaw
ACTUAL PUMP DESIGN 200 gim
PUMP CYCLE TIME
Wetweii
of S
ft
2 5
3
Wetweti C
"1/" I.
939
'1127
1315
puffC
"Q"
200
20
200
A Flow
67.9
67.9
67.9
C c� Tune
nun.
20.95
.1
29.32
Hour
C cies Hil
2.86
2.39
2.05
Diameterft.
8
8
3.5
Q (Flow) = 11 200 gpm
L (Length) = ft
6 in
d (Diameter) = 100 Hazen Williams
C (Friction Coefficient) _
Hf = 0.002083 X L X (100/C)"1.85 X (Q"1.85/d^4.$655)
Pump Off Elevation =
High Point in Line =
He (Elevation Head) =
999 ft
1175 ft
196 It
Q
Hf
He
TDH
175
15.88
196
212
240
20.32
195
216
225
25.27
196
221
Design Flow = 200 gpm
TDH = 216 It
OPERATING CONDITIONS = 200 gpm @ 21V TDH
Fr*ct # 03-102.03
January. 2006

Project CreeteddL 2006-0125 EMU
Prajectrnmber Createdby.
Technicaldata
Submersiblesewage pump FA 10.78Z with motor T 24-4/29K
t
►
Purrcptype
FA 10.78Z
Smwersiori device
DN OMM 54.17M
max, possible
16
much
standard
350 rmn
Free passage
31
irtdr
trr�pef
designed
14
inch
Suc&Mport
raft
0
r .possNe
13 ittch
rneter
0Nondrolspeed
17401/nIn
FRaW
!IT*
Frequ�cy
}z
rating
ImppHertype
Tw0491Wet
impart00
Closed
Standard
1092-2
WOWM
t VWWof pwpend
r�tax 37T
lb,Weightof
unit
max 897.3
YlleO of motor
520.3
�
Materials
Purnpcasing
GGG50
Sucdonporis
GG20
SWAwmyv,m jj
iA308
MVeW
GGG50
Mobfiewear ting
1.4462
Motor
Molorname
T24-4J29K
fd a
4
Ratedpower
Power input with rated power
RaWvoltage
Currertt'tttptr VM rated power
EtC. wfth rated power
38219 229717044
hp
[Raledspeed
1760
4&4
480-3
49
88
rpm
hp
V
A
%
cos pta with rated power
€ os ptd wills starling
0.83
Ra#edlrequ�cY
Operationtype wet
�
$1
Hz
ding ccrrrerrt. direct starting
Start+ngcurrent, star -deft
stardm iorque
320
106
2$4
A
A
!bf t2
dry
Moo 6uid teavevalm
Starts per hour max.
104
15
inertiatrromerd
2.7361
lbft'
Degreeof protec orr
tP68
Sel. explosiors �
Ex-ruxr iber
Ex -designation
Moiarconnection came
4x10 } 2xi,5 NSSH
Duty pohd
data
volu eflow
Head
Shaft power
Pumpeffioiency
PZ
M32
215.5 -
32
34.
USg p m
tt
hp
h°
Flwd
F.O i mpNPSH
Speed
Totaie'f6�cy
WsW. ixe
124
1692
= P2 ` Pumpetficiency
ft
qxn
P�
Power input Pa
36.7 hp

P1114alt Cmatedom 20MM-25 rM ra V-
PfajWMM*W. CrwWby.
Performance curves
SubmefViblesewage pump FA 10.78Z with motor T 244/29K
Power dale Pftred kr
Tdaraimasow tSO9W/AnnexA2
21
21
+
4
14
4
a
fliiiMl
;P2)
3%5
..........
-T
----------
A.
I A,
W
2166 35D
4Q0 45fl 500 550 6fk1 so -M
W,
PUMP
Dutypabd data
Inch
Vokwaffm
203.2 usgaAm-
Nomkabpeed
1740 rpm
Head
215.6 It
Freqtttewy
knpauffitype
60 Hz
TWo-channel
shaft power Pz
PtKapelftiency
32.3 hp
34.3
Power iFIpLd P1
36.7 hp
Rated power
13&219 hp
Req*edp=PMIM
12A ft
SeLexpkxfiMpMWCWn
--
I
Speed
1692 qxn
169
TIL

PROJECT NAME -
PROJECT #
PUMP STATION NAME -
AVERAGE DAILY FLOW
3
PHASE i SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
Clay County, North Carolina
SEWER PUMP DESIGN
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
03-102.03
Licktog #2
FACILITY TYPES
Feodmkial 5ubdivi5ion
Type Unit
No. Units
Gallons/Unit
Average Darr
Flow
Average Daily
Flow
Pump Design
Flow*
lZe5tdewe (Phase 1)
10
-560
3,600
3
6
ReWewe(I'utare)
25
560
9,OOD
6
16
1ack6cl 41125
1
97.500
97,800
68
170
Total Daily Flow
110AW
77
192
'Pump Design Flew
ACTUAL PUMP DESIGN
PUMP CYCLE TIME
2.5 Times Average Daaly Flow
225 gprn
Wetweil
Depth of storage
Wehvelt Capacity
kunPcaPac'tY—A
Flow
9ELeTmie
r
Run Time
Diameter ft.
ft.
"V" MI.
"Q"
S.9w
" W min.
Hour
r C cle
8
3
1127
225
76.7
2231
2.69
7.64
3
3.6
1315
225
761
26.02
2.3'1
8.87
8
4
1503
225
76.7
29.74
2.02
1 10.13
Q (Flow) =
225 gpm
L (Length) =
775 ft
d (Diameter) =
6 in
C (Friction Coefficient) =
100 Hazen Williams
Hf = 0 002083 X L X (1OOlCrl.85
X (Q"1.85fd"4.�
Pump Off Elevation =
1166.5 ft
High Point in Line =
1290 ft
Hs (Elevation Head) =
83.5 ft
Q
Hf
He I
TDH
200
4.77
83.5
88
225
5.94
1
83.6
1
89
250
7.21
83.5
91
Design Flow = 225 gprn
TDH = 89 ft
OPERATING CONDnIONS = 22S gPm 0_ W TDH
!'reject #03-102.0'>
Jamary, 2006

Project Crea6ed� 16 'iAfl i EMU
cremedbr.
Tec hnicaldata
Submersibleaewav pump FA 10.34E with motor T 17.2-4124H
PMW
PMPtype
FA 1034E
halanavoniype
&dce
MOW" 54.17585
;M~
max. possible
10.9
hwh
standard
246 am
Ruipassage
3A
kWh
designed
98 kWh
Suturarport
Presstue rating
PN10
aftpos=Ve
9.2 kwh
RateddMirater
ON100
Notnitmftpead
1740 ltmkr
StWldWd
EN1092-ZS
FreW-"iW
60
Hz
Pressers raft
PMO
ImpeNertyPd
�nndObdmwpw
Aged
DN100
BNercorss t
Ckwd
SdarMand
EN1092-2-D
Wowft
WeWofptunpered
jnWL1058
lb
tNewofwdt
max.3WA
eigNof motor
2008
Rr
Mateniaie
Pwnpcasbv
GG25
StationMvrM ssa9
1.4308
GG25
Mobbewear rmg
1.4462
Motor
Motorrmne
T 17a-424H
I
I+kunberOf pain
4
Reledpower
115.42
hp
lRaledspeed
1700
rpm
Pourer mptvwlh rated power
18.8
hp
RetedvoRage
230t460 3
V
DutmntvVtd dth rated power
41.5
A
Effidency with rated power
82
%
cos pM vAth rated parker
0.85
Hz
r os phi wMh s tg
0.73
Operabontype wet
S1
Stert;ttgowettt,daedsta M
220
A
Opwa*wtypedry
Stwongcurertt, star -dam
73
A
Motefluid teaVeretwe
104
'F
Starthtgtomus
111
If ft
Starts per Gw—nmx.
15
hwliianu ment
0.318
IMP
Degreeof protecn
IM
Set.explosionprotection
—
Ec mwiber
Ex-desigrtetion
Motorcomeection cable
4x6 +4x1.5NSSHOU
Duty point
data
Vo►ezxr>etitnk
225
USg.P.m
FW
, P"
Head
69
ft
RBgrniredpempNPSfi
58
ft
Shaft power
P2
8.4
hp
Speed
1713
rpnt
Pumpeffidency
60.3
%
Towlefficiency
N PUMPOMderecy
Power kvtA Ps
10.5 hp
P,
�
t�

r,>l cab,:
Createdorr .,� war EMU
Performance cures
Submersibtesewage pump FA 10.34E with motor T 17.2-4124W
Power data reftned t r way. pre IIW%I ; WP.6 .3iSbl ; 1.016SEAM
Tderatoeasper ISDOM/AnngxA2
glp-
PUMP
Dift POW data
desi
9"/,6 hich
Voknmft r
55 t1Sg p m.
Im rpm
Head
89 R
Fit
60 RZ
^.sly power P2
8.4 hp
kveftfmm
Mngfe-channel
Puwgmfftlen t
60.3 %
Motor
Power bpa P,
14.5 hp
fww—power
1 .42 hp
ptMWNFSH
5.8 It
SeLevicsionpfoux9im
Spit
11113 rpm

PROJECT NAME- The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
PROJECT # 03-102.03
WET WELL FLOATATION CALCULATIONS
PUMP STATION NAME
Licklog
#1, Licklog #2
Fiberglass Wt. =
75 lbsfcf
Concrete Wt. =
150 lbsfcf
Earth Overburden Wt. =
45 ibstcf
Water Wt. =
62.4 lbsfcf
(A.)
Inside Diameter =
72 in.
Volume per foot of wall height
Inside Diameter =
6 ft.
= Outside Dia. Area - inside Dia. Area
Wall Thickness =
6 in.
= 10.21 cu.ft.
Outside Diameter =
84 in.
Outside Diameter =
7.0 ft.
Weight of Manhole per foot of wall height
= Votumn per foot of wall height X Concrete Wt.
= 1531 Ibsfft
Weight of Water per foot of wall height = Inside Dia. Area X Water Wt.
1763 lbsfft
(C.)
USE WITH EXTENDED BASE SECTION
Extended Base Dia. = 1000 in.
Extended Base Dia. = 8.333 ft.
Extended Base Area = 54.51 sq. ft. Volume of base = Extende..d Base Area X Base Thickness
36.34 cu. ft.
Base Thickness = 8 in.
Base Thickness = 0.66667 ft. Weight of base = Volume of Base X Concrete Wt.
= 5451 lbs.
Earth Overburden Area = Extended Base Area - Outside Dia. Area
16.0!� sq. ft.
Earth Overburden Weight per foot of depth = Earth Overburden Area X Earth Overburden Wt.'
722 lbstft
Top Elev.
lnvt. Elev.
Depth
Wt. Riser
Wt. Base*
Earth Overburden
M.*-*
Total Wt.
Water Wt
Add.
Concrete M.
1180
1 1164.5
1 15.5
1 23727
1 5451
f 11194
1 40372
1 17634
-22738
* Use Section B with Standard Manhole Section or Section C with Extended Base Section
** Add Earth Overburden only with Extended Base Manholes

PROJECT NAME- Phase I Sewer System Improvements
The Ridges at Mountain Harbor
PROJECT # 03-102.03
SEWER FORCE MAIN VELOCITY CALCULATIONS
Club House PS to Phase Ill Connection
FM
tal Daily Flow 33,000 22
inimum Pump Capacity gpm (2.5 Times Average Daily Flow) = 55
Actual Club House PS Capacity =
80 gpm
DIA (in)
AREA ( )
FLOW pm
FLOW (efts
V ftJsec
2
0.02
80
0.178
8.17
i
0.09
ter-,
0.178
2.04
6
0.20
80
0.178
0.91
FACILITY TYPES
VesidentiA Subdivision
Type Unit
No. Units
Gallons/Unit
Average Daily
Flow (g
Average Daily
Flow (gpm)
kesideme (Phase III -Pinnacle)
115
560
41,400
29
Total Daily Flow
41,400
29
Minimum Pump Capacity gpm (2.5 Times Average Daily Flow) = 72
Club House PS Capacity
Proposed Phase ill (Pinnacle) PS Capacity
Total Force Main Flow
80 gpm
100 gpm
180 gpm
DIA (in)
AREA ( )
I FLOW (g im)
FLOW (cfs)
V ftisec)
2
0.02
180
0.401
18.39
4
0.09
160
0.401
1
4.60
6
0.20
1 C
0.401
2 .0

Total Daily Flow 97,800 1 68
Minimum Pump Capacity gpm (2.5 Times Average Daily Flow) = 170
Actual Licklog #1 PS Capacity =
200 gpm
DIA (in)
AREA ( )
FLOW (gpm)
FLOW (cfsj
v (ftfsec
4
0.09
200
0."6
5.11
6
0.20
200
0.446
2.27
8
0.35
200
0.446
1.28
r
otal Daily Flow 108,600 75inimum Pump Capacity gpm (2.5 Times Average Daily Flow) = 189
Actual Licklog #1 PS Capacity = 225 gpm
D1A (in)
AREA ( )
FLOW pint}
FLOW (cfs)
v (f fsec
6
0.20
225
0.501
2.55
8
0.35
225
0.501
1.44
f0
0.55
225
0.501
0.92

FACILITY TYPES
P651jealal 5u6jivi5im
Type Unit
No. Units
Gallons/Unit
Average Daily
Flow (gpd)
Average Daily
Flow (gpm)
Residence (Pka5c 11-A-Ae Kr&)
190
360
68,400
48
I Total Daily Flow
68,400
48
Minimum Pump Capacity gpm (2.5 Times Average Daily Flow) = 119
Licklog #2 PS Capacity
Proposed Phase 11 (Ashe Knob) PS Capacity
Total Force Main Flow
225 gpm
150 gpm
375 gpm
DIA (in)
AREA (fe)
FLOW (9pm)
FLOW (cfs)
V
6
0.20
575
0.836
4.26
0.35
7�1151
0.836
2.39
10
0.55
575
0.836
1.53

i
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P,E Direc or
- .-Division of Watcr Quality
April 13, 2007 _ iP
r
Mr. Stephen Sellers, Chairman
wl APR 1 g 2007
Clay County Water & Sewer District
Post Office Box 118 Uf
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Subject: Fast -Track Application Return
National Investments, LLC
Ridges at Mountain Harbor (Phase 11)
Clay County
Dear Mr. Sellers:
On March 20, 2007 our Asheville Regional Office received a Fast -Track Application submitted by
National Investments, LLC seeking permission to build gravity sewers, pump stations and force mains
to serve their Ridges at Mountain Harbor (Phase 11) development. The collected wastewater would
be treated in the Clay County Water & Sewer District's wastewater treatment plant.
The District's wastewater treatment plant has a design hydraulic capacity of 300,000 gpd and is
currently receiving flows in excess of 120,000 gpd, Since April 2006 the Asheville Regional Office
has issued nine permits authorizing the construction of collection sewers that would discharge their
nnllon+od Lei st %A, +or +n +ho Il p+rim+�o +row+r»on+ nl�r,+ Tho ell IrroM+ fln��i r�l� �n +he minQ n rw�i++orl
C-11-1- Tta YYaJtG YV atC-il tV 11 Iri. r1i II,t J tI GaU I Ie It plant. � � �G t+tAl ire, I %JVV N�uJ U IC rli a VperMitted
projects represent a flow of 383,880 gpd.
In accordance with North Carolina Administrative Code 15A 2T .0304 (b) the Division has
determined that based on the above stated facts that the treatment system is not capable of
accepting the additional waste represented by the subject permit application. Therefore, I am
instructing the Asheville Regional Office to return the Fast -Track Application submitted by National
investments, LLC.
It may be appropriate for the District to evaluate the nine projects currently under construction
to determine if all nine will be constructed and discharge the volume of wastewater permitted. If any
of the projects are scaled back, reducing the volume of flow discharged, a permit modification may be
requested. This may free up flow allocation to allow for other sewer extension project approval.
Please inform the Asheville Regional Office of your findings.
We would welcome an approvable engineering evaluation of your future wastewater treatment,
utilization, and disposal needs. The evaluation must consider expansion of the existing system,
elimination or reduction of extraneous flows, or water conservation and must include the source of
funding for the improvements
North Carolina
�Vaturall�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10%o Post consumer Paper

CLAY COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT April 13,_2007 PAGE 2
encourage you to call Roy Davis in our Asheville Regional Office for further discussion of this
matter. Mr. Davis may be reached at 828-296-4659.
I'
Since ,
an W. Klimek, P.
I
i
cc: Scott Fain, National Investments, LLC, Post Office Box 293, Hiwassee, Georgia 30546
T. Dean Haney, PE, 69 Jenkins Valley Road, Alexander, North Carolina 28701
Roger Edwards, Asheville Regional office
Jim Reid, Asheville Regional Office
r;,Days, AAheulll�;xRegionai office
Clay County
Clay County Water & Sewer District Collection System
Application Return Letter.07

.AY COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Aril 13 2007 PAGE 2
I encourage you to call Roy Davis in our Asheville Regional Office for further discussion of this
matter. Mr. Davis may be reached at 828-296-4659.
Since ,
7
/111 an W. Klimek, P.
cc: Scott Fain, National Investments, LLC, Post Office Box 293, Hiwassee, Georgia 30546
T. Dean Haney, PE, 69 Jenkins Valley Road, Alexander, North Carolina 28701
Roger Edwards, Asheville Regional office
Jim Reid, Asheville Regional Office
Roy Davis, Asheville Regional office
Clay County
Clay County Water& Sewer District Collection System
Application Return Letter.07

2007
11:09RM
Clad Count-4 Water & Sewer [phone]
C104
Count4\Ater &.1 Sewer Dis+ric+
Fax Transmittal To:
ATTENTION-
- ------- -------- LAYTON SCHUH
P. 1
MAR 2 6 2007
Phone numbers phonet [phone] WATER QUALITY SECTI
Fax., (828)389,1471 ASHEVILLE RE.G 0 NAIL OFF SCE
Fax njimberj <c 'Z8 Zq9—043 Email [e-mail]
For your information Date Sent.
ReVL-W Time senv --------
❑ Menge Comment
❑ Reply Number of pages including cow pages
Re.
- - - - - - - - - -
...... . ... ......
Clay County Water and Sewer
P.O. Box 838
Hayesville, NC 28904

2007 11:09RM
wear,
r �
,Mr. Stephen Sellers
Gllly County WWTP
P.O. Box 11 a
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Clatj County Water & Sewer
Maroh9, '2007
1828] 389-1471 p,2
Michael F. Bosky, Gavemor
William 0. Rasa Jr., Secretary
North Catalitta Department of Environment and Watuml Rwourcei
A1art W.:{��i»e1c. $ E..D1�Sgetor
_,• :t D1W5l*h'i0.WAsd4iYtity
Subject; SpectaleWe 1=filuent Limits
Ia County WWTP
i•!� �r'P . k
: "L'•u' �' ..... '.:.. .. .:' .. ,. !: y ...:-':ti �:'-i:�'-...tif"Y `fir-�Y'. t.l'A•�� C - 1. ... ��?i, +-.��r�, '.. .-. J... ..�. A_.n r
ytoun
Door,Mr. Sallera:
Thlwlbtw, Is ih roOpmeell 'tci' your - requeAt, -for sgewiglIvie effiitteht llrMts-''for -a pro 668d"expansion: 91:00y'County
WWTP• from-0..& MGp lb 0.9 MG0 of + astoomter diabhervlrig to Hlw►essee River.
° ja�nd eatfn':' Clay CouhtyWVWTP dIschaW hrio'the Miwassee'River, <appraxlrrrdWy:4:S lt't11e0 do ln+aRatre'8rn
VP Ghaktosi .0f tn,. and-, half -0' mlle� iipetftam the QExiflueneb *f- This
eq rrri + t.tsf 11he'^,l ivrt lsltrlie Fglver ttfelssifieol lMs�1 vatete; T#rs'HIw. 0 e, Fth�en'igasl '>�len ir1 lioelted'ti l Lipka
ChetuQe was rigor it 1 by O1Nt,I.In.:Jtilrte, J I•y UrPdt Au&iit•:of 2004a t:q*�nutrle.nt' r#Ili itoropf�I,a conOW Idris
were. found In all the rna' Mho Indicetlrlg love blQlQ&*' I Obdut+tivity.
Ss letalyd_Lil i#e:: Tt,e!Bpeoufauv+e lknite. were daviloped abased- on en: EPA�.—a d' l:eVot a.,model +an the
Hlwa t se -River with an added west'eweter dlschlargo.6f 3 gig MGD:
:Bdisett on evaitobl6,lnformiiUlon, sgtecur#tive eftivant limits for the l poaed'dlat rge'of 0.9;, t C to 'Mlinras se
River are presented in Tabu 1, A complete evetu+aitiein of•th6s6-t1rM$ Ahd hitFl1itor'h0', "UW1*I0*46 addition to
monitoring requirements for any applicable nutrients, metals and other toxicerlts, vAll be addiessed upon receipt
of a formal NPGES permit application request.
The model results do not show elgnIftent. Impact., on predicted instream dissolved oxygen levels from this
proposed discharger fear the speculative limits for BODa and NH$ presented in Table 1.
1winearing Alternatives.Anslvsls (AAA.):., .p,loape noiP,;that,.tbo, DMsion conript .guslrents�t. th yl.' 11;NPC7ES permit
for ann ans�lon':to 0,.9 MOD will, be lssued.- Anal,de;clilonr3; ptiii`i. b .rr}ade °eRer the `Dlvlsipri're6elves and.-.
evaluate* a formal permit application for Clay County's pri�pOS.0 exppneion.,
In accordance wHh the Nprth. Cproline General Statutes,, the, practXrr tit `.;waietewatar fret trrgen#' t,ti disposale�
alternothwith the least adverse impact on the envlron of is requ `tci,pe-lcnplemtanted. Tfiterefore, as e
Component of all NPDES,'permit applications for new or expanding f .W, a .detailed engineering siterrte
bnalysis (EAA) must be prepared. l r
North Carolina Drvision of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 276MI6I 7 Phone [phone] S Customer Service
Internet; 2M?W:ncwatarauatitv.0r1r Uaatron. Six N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
M Equal gppelun"Mnadve Aution EwOMr- 60% ROW018M0% Past Consumer Paper

2007 11:OSAM C1a�j County Water & Sewer [phone]
.i�iieras P.3
t
Tt( F kai06K.106tify reAuaeted. Ylows, 'and' provide an enblysle, of P, itentlal weaa�#swat*r Aalternath►es. to.. su P4e waetar.:tliae rer : siri:h ape's r /dr irr treaytrrr. as a,t#rree.
reducftn, are auansidsrapd,to he erwlaar'iPt+pra>aetll P aY 1P igaatic�n,, waastewl+ater 1+suaaEaE, or 1 irifiltratbrr.
letter.. P�errr►k y copy a�f the EAA� mquaiarerneilfs. i� at#achsd'to
R111"O rns for new or sap andinE now will bereturned, as. incomplete M. ,'air tsar ^
104aaaalrorrra>fnre we n4tr:*d• trffaiarara+eft,',. If ' have any queara+tl+v►ns. regarding these
cOnt*Ct-thaa DWt3 NPDES Unat st 9l9r733- $. �Wu meNtte~ :pleases
' Ena11MMer i• P aasae�
.i. F ,11MMOVt A SEPA.E JEM d rn •na+ ,�:
04 P a . that 1 need aa• : pl aid' fbr
�. �;. ; �uea�,_pr�rltiic m�ey.aar. al'fb'adCt
aiq�"PMMly,irnp the.wW. xmnt. For:rte,aarw stawapV.. dteCi�d s public lands, 3%' might hefta, pnftrrtist to
dlsChWW- .of 5trk'� OOID g° , gr iCen� impapa,t Is, daf6rte+d as as: prate
1 itaariar; .Fah exlat an b lrea�m wapate cormntra ! of � '•J�,96 :baa
9 ttsi .a�rx:�:7p
flaaNaar. Since salt proposed �e 81*Mn rnpocrig: dotted ae en a aerleion -Cyf > .goa bW. -.:
P based dischaMe, is :Tarr aaarslsting of* e rge. w1j.h asParrr�siaQn of �ti�` :.e ..
MUGt pr � as MPA a wrt�ent itiat �olaltaiEsr th+! .passes flog Ilan A g •Flow, you.
The NP.0 , Unit; Wtll not +ace P ttiv a quxIity'a u t�„,�a M ,
+ 'Pl EB :psrenit. sPpl�icatle" for the Pry::,new -dischame iIA"It- the.
�ris��,;;1'► aPPra��►d..t�:: P�► 8taW, C�
uct'hrakp {ter}t s tt'
ieaarirrghr�auaa for r•�Iaw; assert# 'csaeer meant �,; Si��'A± Envs�: +aaa±rreni; clear juew4ctrtiaan Forth* . i�a (MAXI ar�rark*,':e
pr t..tf the SEPA► EA'dernorasia►etaa'thaaa# the.projeasi maa4lr a sad# In a eignoice nt.
Baas etfeo#r.ow.,the . q+uailt ;.:aari� :ttte. envl� o nrner(
Stet+lmtaa►#��Itw.e. yoaur� :P�+.a� R y t: ;must .tl� =. p"gpow. a, SEPA,>.l l,8 : j; t
avill� anaarnad;:�e"'
.: 4e, f+alded :1 ;:the . PA., OccL s►1iaile s'�
nt:. ; ..Sgpy�.t,re:::,.atL ;Ar+4:
r'elf t .ate. r rr aldecl Y, rilt:5lf::yfl�;ho'� 14MY q itte�r�e'ro ih ;$ Pik ragwi errA
Please contact Hannah StaltiMe with the 17WO planning: Eri-6na&h at..
The-I�ivf'itl�ra9ogl!a+aErQyRaur:per�ft.renswral.,a�pitllcatiCrt:en"IRabru,,�2.:�007.;V�Fs'wikl likely..- ..:- , . •
the ren.maal epplicatlan due to�the length of time to:do:aa' F-P a�QQulxlalll1l,,. PO.O. d fonwaatr+d..with
,Sh+�1�1;,XoW h��la9.+�n�E`queue_r�rbput:tfI,es�.:�pec�alatl� limits car NPD��pe�rrniitin�.requlrerr►ents, ;ple8as�:t9�l;fre�s
to Caor► ae AgyRmw Adu-Polru at [phone], 9 itenslgn: W8.. '
Sincerely,
Suea+1,4, Wilson. P.E.
—.. .._— w.�-..C,J.r;..u.u.v.„. r,::r:ce4.., . --.,ut�an -, rnnYi::P �fv�; ., ia. .a . : ly%: '-'•��.-' ">?;.,;:`'.?:�.§,:i;•.',;r.:
Attrrment: E,4A'duld+tince
Gocurnerrt '
cc: (without Attachment)
D WOAshevllle Regional Offlce/Surraos Water Protection Sectlan
Central Flies
NI'i3'EE:Psrrrtit#.:Flte, NCO026697
DE1,1-' MI evi le Regionaal. OffkWiames /terns
Envision Associates, ►na.a'[ onarld'ts:'. ter =
554 R Rlvemide Drive
Ashavift, NC.28844,
NC VViIONO ReaOur+ C)o�tlriii laft�+Y;'�tiartd'l�la�hierla�elFr�d Harris
U5 Fbh & Wild Life/Tom
13. a-33720
ftal'wo.;.'NCr 27838

2007 11:09AM Clad County Water & Sewer [phone]
p.4
'North Cgito'Hna Divisigil' ,-Witer'C x, ity /:l�+'PDEUnit
NOTE: The N.C. Aivision of Water Quality (IJW ) �viH not accept .an NPPgS r4poemtion for et: at
expanding weatewater treatitment plant discharge unless all the required application re- quirerments we
submitted. A complete NPDES application will include the following items:
NPDES Application Form (in triplicatte)
... ..... . +, .. .. .... ii,-;t .,..:. —..r., o,•,�W+.,w.; �{y';. ;uti ri+i: o� r iA:�:� rraf =.: ::,j:i ! of �+.6 Y—..... � ��Wtrf`2.'F;;;c?`::.-f. ..-.•aa r
. Eq�[aaeesin Altietnaatfvea. - .',`', . _...
g $valysaia � triplicatar) .,�.
Local C'aovomment R,eviarw Form (nose -municipals only)
Failure to submit all of the required itiforniation will result in return of the incomplete paatlaaage. If you have
any, gpestions about these vaq+& a entr oo�ptzact. tha:..1�Tl�DES. Unit SW -at 91.9-733Z0 .,, Appliga+tion forms,
applicctable.. < fem. rind ga,tdance dacuts: '. eta:va{lab�le ..on, tie iPl1 ......welfsite at
Cpmpleiid.- .40cistiat�ne... ; be mailed to:
NCDE A/DWQ FDBS Unit U17 Mail Service Center, Rakigh, N C<;7099- 17..
The: NPDRS, pemut ptogratzs was enacted iai Y 72 ats part, of ti a Cleaia` axer,,�ict,. `3"liie ae ital ` aaI of'the program
was`oa:w;liXnihir: all point source diva' ta+ aurface.;►ter't.iy 1985..cttough thisoarX was :floc atchir.*ed„ the
NINES' program raritiriues `tei strive 'fv�ward it Iti tlsait light, an ;'L gmeetlag ; ltetiiiatives "*"is (EPA) is
required with any WDES •applicaation for at new ox expatYding' wststewaater treatrneist plant dischaarge, k
accordance with ISA NCAC 214.0105(c)(2). In order for an NPDES application to be apprgv4 the :.FAA,snwt
pxovide; complete }ust3iYcation for a direct discharge to surface water alte=*dve, and. der�oaai&a e,,lih# i'th�ee} �di�cl�sutge
is the. in,ost a nvikonmeninay enured 4terriati t selected: iroin""'All tsaasotiabl, cost-' effective opilbus [par 1 SA' NCAC
'l;' Purpo c Of
..,, . die'A sudnee Aocusie t is p ' ae to1�th.e. �re Axeted•:
cO:sM' .asu.ahiy' ; .thtth,fei'b'c]Ini7tiRuiiaitgir nI}oafroegi
wateater die� alt�tiahe itupeou this cd,6
fP5iiajaxfyotlew C;adoni
ware bcicag retutt�d aar irlcosri 'late due tb inadequate I�.eubsaiseiatss; et►ai 2) a
few ,cetera catiitt ctaee resulted In unfarvaralsle "di gs " itr'rhe N, ;. ES ►3ts'thaargtr'due.,iri laiart to tnaa aaite FAAs,
DWQ► rnost frequently returns EAAs as kc-ornpl�ete clue to inaa equate flow justifi+eaaicla, 'inedea irate altettiaEtiv�cs
evaluations, axed/cm lack of docmnentation/references used to design and cost alternatives.
Please note th'sk tlxis gxaidence aioctixnsxit is desioneti prfmI ly fbr dotiiestic aitiatewTztaer, diecliarges `F0�t'aatkiar proposed
diaehar�,es such eeti vvster tteathent. plaint die from %i ayaa:hanga ars+g rawa se asznosis tits, sonio alternative
d6oveaal'optir�ts'mky. not be'techluAi ically fcWble• Wit i this �iiidasi `"aieiOmn;h `we leave'attenip'ted to point [gut
Where such te�elvncilogieal limit4ttan9s may eaiet '3Cati are uzged`to reoie NPDFS pa:tiittin.g $vidatrice'doctiimp.. is on
the N1 E^rs' tiirebute; arlsich iaen$s► some of the liiiiiieddh `bad cYptibins for aaathe iiiicliai ai` '
Fleaae , not; that if a pr#pvaad mauxirdpal expaij*io t'''is . -subject to SE'PA Eav,ir+arimeritaxli Assessment
(EA)I�Enwironnaer,tal impact Statea wnt (EIS) realuara meths;` tii�`' i11�.'.i atitei7iteenxs dhba ld .be is o atea'A into the
SZV. ` curnft- M'. In a"tion, the IODFS Unit Caaara t"accept an a i ii�t►iiiata for a ned % i fi dascharge
urltiidopartuiental' t'es►iew bf the StPA, document ii. cQm 'fete" ''a Fisidiug of'No Sigioifi,c rix 1=0kt (FONSt) has
been eubniittid to the State Mar 4ftoaise for clrculatinn:'
The following step-by-step outline should be used (or the preparation of all FAA submissions. Ifsm FAA submission
lacks any of these basic elements, the NPDES application will be returned as incomplete.
E" Guidance Lomme nt Version: June 23, 200S
.I of8

2007
11:09AM Clad County Water & Sewer [phone]
P.5
STEP" 1: Detern ne if the prdpooe.d'.,:d.l*tch a.r e. • , be -aHo ed
'Before bal{ituutt8 �p englaeeZM.g cralbittkM of altex moves, you niust Furst determine if the
proposed rrrastewater
discharge will be allowed. Otherwise' time and money may be spent needlessly for an FAA preparation that vwiU
ultimately be rejected on the basis of �Wstittg water 're suicte , - 'Thtze tat several potential resuictYow - to a
Wastewater discha* tip ibxface't+Vaters,"sacluctfng
Zero flow stteato reatrictioiis [15A NCAC 2B4266(dit a�:to oacygg=coristuiaii,g vntein tt ro-ftar'
streams. In order to determine atteamflow at the proposed discharge location, contact the U,S.
Cseologai:col. Survey at 919-571-4000.
Rcae vieg atrearn classii1cation restdctkma [e.g., ORW..WS, SA; iNSW, and HQ�elose waters have various
discharge testricticros or require atricter'tx+eattnetit `'etaz}inrdi]: Stiri' clam are available cm the
DWQ website and from the'DW-Q'Statxdar&4,* C easi itsttiatie L?tut 4019-733�5483, mobile wasovAmter
discharge restrictions for various stream clasaiCcationa are presented in atate regulations [ 15A NCAC
2B:42Cq.
&aa ttwide Water Quality Plans. These bean -BP41 ific pl&be I'm 'tf NVDES'pttt*ttlsYg strategies chat -neap
]unit weetewaiter discharges to"pastitulat stteama witliit� the basfse'tiiit, t;q lack'of strew as#siriila< *
capacity, ctc. $asiii ,o a a&- iV- eilahU —on the' 'DWQ' cvebsite, or pair ronp codtact the`'13DPQ Barxinwiar
Planning Unit at 91xni9�733=5f3_`
piir
:;�Vat4xaad,'ID- ,u,4t�,lis
icn emdin . I+e�.a�,?d cars.,#h�-,���(cl�<.lia�•�..�a�::�.,;
} T11+11]L,s, 'nxny haFC-waateu*aker dtschatg testcti 4t,�:'. 3'l�e list. c►f 30(' impaired .eaters is
locaterd 9n the I]WQ'virgbsite, ar, Fau: may, contact the b�VQ ModelingJ'�•'mbL unit'at:.919-:7,
i'ressace of En d'S ecies. it eft arig P,e " r;', '
l p ete s des ¢ie present � the sea 48 to ran,
throe. my. be waste ter dischaw restactiogs. Endangered species inf�orenation may �e inclu Ion the
Basinwide {Water t uaiity Plan; ox .you teAy contaet'the U'S. Fish and q�ildlife Serve
N.C. Wildlife Reat+u=ea Conuru.s iPn (019-73'3-3633); oar'the N.C. Natural'I�erit$ge Progsarri.`:(9�J=3-
law
As a. gaiblic. advice, the NPI ES Unit will evaluate whether a p;oposeci ereunicipal discharge ia. cc}nsidered allowable.The municipality beech to initiate this review by su6tnitd'* a lette-t tetpieat for Speculative Effluet,t Litnit® to the
NPDEwu Unit. If du proposed discharge appears to be .allawahle, the NPDES Uteit will prepare speculative effluent
for pr a rn urn •anp of 2 1;1owa and 2
discharge lacatioe�a ue water +aitY tsxodels...The taunti[i ali th
#�. -: ��,, ,al�#�. �_
k� tY caa en use
tiL00,
_Ok
..te % 1%uttd Instances ,vler+e wa t5a10M�
sued, ckt', nne pateritial water quality iuYpxcts, som.4; murdcipalitiea. have undertaken the �tno
trevlew) in order to espedit�e this portion of the NPDBS ertnit zeviea, delitig effort (with DWQ
P Process. .
NU&MILImICIRRI a =liCMnlat•
Due tOAtalfi',cocstrsdt tp. the 1ti FDES Unit capnpt prepareapmoative lets f4 nQa-ZAuM0 a aa�rta. Thus, it is
yoear. zesponsibili to: rnslse your own dctrasYi�=eatioa, as, to,. the „ er the osec] diairfi F' .1?Plt
o d by the
Divis .l?Y. uatiog the.wa slily c a. zed bovrtNpD p ran •r =de
sly s �, +„ t
d that,g�ou diacuas .th,. escl
dtisc srge.with,rba:spplicable WQ.Iie onaY.c�€i-ce.and%fit, F.S [Jtrit,ata£f wkio �1
the likelihtsod of a sere ti Y kts.able tia pi vidt.;regea# azi
/�p�n+dirf,�. .�>a,.�e. •4£tr�t,a#ep: 3!Ast: rt►.wFt. �b#ai�..�txea�xxA+�w��iaytisates, fc�>e th�:R��d
tl+isclYarpe. loca#iars, to ttlaure that the receiving atream is trot subject tte. zero fliyw :reatr}cticins. how flaw data
((ap: 7.,:Q1c�OQ2 4�w:or_atuaaca t ob
S.uty a# 01 -' 7..1-4 0., ,he, � . �? . JI , £ a dal, qe, f iri th . tJ,S- +Geglogioal
f # pc=t
'tr eatsfien s . . , .. .. ,. t ,the: l?, Q$° a _a� + i t• 4f .#> sG4 a.. f .was tewatter
tpla t•f?ndits.appurt i �qp ti 1 t>;ll.z, ;, k/ .su yis +t bdr;':..',it4ca�,.:..0 w111 need to
request the local government(s) to eotnpiete a Tracer Ckove mlx nt Review Pow. (Attsicla eazt A ,slid lxeclsde the
signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package -
FAA Guidance Document Version: June 23, 20os
Page 2 of 8

2007 11s1ORM Clad CountO Water & Sewer [phone]
p.6
.If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable, diecharp" critierla, than begin the FAA
preparatioa'by suiximaxizirig the following general'information ibout the pxopaiced ptojcct
provide a +iesctipti+�rx- of the proposeed p �c�ech'+"If tht,' roject will be t�ua a in phases, p%vida a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected Bow per phase (ice STEP Z).
M Applicant natae, mailing tddress, phone number, contact person
■ Facility .name, address, county, phone number, contact person
' EAA.pnv2rct's name, mailing addtcse,.phpine nutabet, contectpers4n
STEM' 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flaw
$e8idetsbal'�'a��,ti_� Pni'rc '�.
Fscilitiies"r+ ueiting an NPLfES diachpzge permit 'for` nc%v be 'cp ' �omeet3'c �irpstewatxs c e her es must
docuttient the"populattoas to be 'setsred within the service area over it 20-year. planning P&siOd The NC State
neib69, 0, hics'utsit.provides population data for etch. county at�d. municipality.' and cm. be accessed on the Interact at
http:f/dvwvw.d.. ,3t�te.nc.us.' ,;7,2 t7- ula a:
g flat treiidrf'"fi'one�p' pectubaxs "ftir sptci c areas s:re `'tinta{able; a"linear
e ttstip¢ilatiti f P'uF t$e. piit,t ;decade' should# be i"ed.' 1 g iev;ikii6ii fko= a 'Vkcar srd�jtcbian ., ,.
method must bt'cxesrlg ustxSed, if.p itt projectiotu ititliidc'futufe 00he�atieiss, ihdudda mopb4d annexation
scheci*'sts'wa as %ny aiiac:ot66A ",
s initit 6e'#u6t:
JusfifiCation of'tiow as well as a demohsttaiigri a need shall be pi c4ided. Mere speroculatiQn`is not suffiiiietib `Flow,
projections ' should represent average anticipated flows, since pcttnit flow ]invite are based oti, rtiontliig aymiVs.
Peaking factors used to design various components of the wastewater collection system. (e.g., collector sewers,
interceptor sewers, putniping stations) should not be used in the .justification of the average anticipated flow. , For
municipal maatewster discbatggers, #lbw `must be justified ►ziing the Clean WAter state Reti lv ' Fund (G"ti�ISRF)
criteria available on the Intesnet.at hic.s/LjMCka ,n f ajJear I�01 a�litt�il, cej tit�rta to`tltiese #]ci( rxiteiia
may be approved on a,cale-by�caae 19si67s provided ideyuate justifstati6ti i aulsplied,
I- RIM- I_' a curxeat . fiQwi; includingxesidezxt 1, . co:nts►era dustrsa�," and otut-a=reesive
m traiaoajiti ow (Ifl) 6s�setl°inn
a�sl flow`'diiii or-'wittri'b records. c.i=etxt°ttsltiirntiakflow and
uttent con=erd4 £low iaay be Uied on'water billing retards minus Vlo°!o c6t2sutnptive loss. Current
indiAi4d davit tnay be based oii dual Metering to determine cotwuttipt3tre'lbsies. Ciatttstt I Lion-escess�ve
i should also be cktetmiiied in accotdaue with CVV'W criteria. If TJI is. clortl,otxstrated. "to ;be s►bove
CWSRP criteria, that mftasttucture'contribu'titig to' 1teessive I&T. tiiust eiEtiet''be` aired or
prior to any te�quest fiax'flow'=?atisioti. . . , -, . ,.: ' replaced
..:.
p�ti -�C f3e1 Ptovitie 20- ar tesitleaffai #Iowa ''bisOd ' oii ro� ,ed `" p ect - reaidentta! pxn h,
141uStip}yr.the projc66d rin residential po ulit'ti4n hy•70.g gris'pc� dad• pert pifa;
�., iiICB t4VLC�C 20 fioNNB":'b -ed on projected resid, tial growth.
F Multiply, tlie'pro)ectetx g + urth in iresid itw popiilatjt ii "15 ez c1a et ca tta.
F+ti�ti_nei gsllotie 1? Y j
_atrial Fly I�roir�i a fl ► fni'Futute induit i fl
�utuxe ]at1�led in s ��� � . ow, �.`'A''itott�eal"allonce fcit
t,o�is tstii be c d e p clear Y
tj d taia]'e�cp�as T.. oai� 'F`t >r}idisi'on, mvided`tl a laasii is 1
, lsdfieti r.. , ..
t land'-uic: pl'aiiis' . t"t� •t1i , ��t". ,�a1.�`c�vvCli:
t1C1Ij;.rn,,;:
i IPA
... allv�w #ice for hod-cTccas�ve Y/� for' n�v se�t►+t� °lii;� "'thy` be
coasideei d l y tie`] ivisiori, rA4,d the basin i$' clearl' ua
Flaw tray be justified'ui,accozdance with 1M NeGA 2H,0 19(l) .fo ,variqup aetivitles (e.g„ new.suktdivisions, now
schools, various Commercial activities). For other proposed disr6uge s (e.g., graundvYatrtx remediation, water
Eaa Guidance Document Vereidw June 23, 2005
Page Of 8

Mar 26 2007 11:11AM Clay County Water & Sewer [phone]-'
p.7
Zabment plant iMtcr 'liwraeh; :i� dUstii:,l-. fkciliti-00 'thy flt 'pYojectiarss, vtll br baeaed vA orrg aeoYitx$ desip
idet"dnd arid'/or produ.ction'prtijectiorts rathti�than'p6pulatid
n pjecti$: '„
Since a gc+al of the Clean Water Act is to m►'n+*n!3e or
eliirirYst oinf socu�ae discliges 'to surface. waters, any
F
proposal fat a new or Expanding waswMateK dischatr m stindude evaluation Of
addition to direct discharge, Particularly for dischargers of dam .&ovaat trrr iapasaX'ait�matcYes its
tic Wa®tev�rato' this eviwttuon should investigate, the
feasibility of the following '%Wbmter disposal alter tives: . ...
■ Connection to an rtxi dv Wastmntct tteatinent plant (public or private)
■ L;et►d applicstan :nitiati+es, stih ae idividallcorautuity'$ite ausce system, drip iteration;
spray irsigatiors
• Wastewater reuse
Surface vnter d' harge.t�=ugh-the NPi]ES pt�gratx�
In �Tl1M fez #bt .a},paat + ix(uate a st ... S?Al s�lt
r
s?Zs�7�lly:itafr3eib�e,, relit
. eq ter disp � x'raatiYe, you, must.eithe* s t�>k.xh�.al+a�ative is
� ld be., true b
]?I e,rake t sst f4? :. sme t rx eves tt;. l?,oh1alpl;atae.21tP=1 ye.
snit; bye eaeier.fro, press� atF •:aikv >xPx Yc b thaw ttchnolagual feasxl:ail�ity. Pole e,ple,- for a lard ��yj�� ,,yy . , �;�',+� p17•��. coat"+�;ther
a h? rt .wC:Y,ettl'e1., S#� AC3"0#
hot a land application alternative, it =Ugbt be easier to simply assume thnt thte r uitE i calculate the Presentacreage cbi ci be purchased and
vela~ mats (including current market Iand costs} for this opdan,. atlz r:
las►d. ap ati4rt, is. Rccit�ol ]a land et�+4ds? ►?.etlxer
tt4 t# enfe4s}b1A; due:. to. . Of av44le j1 4i/4t.
lifted as: techt�plo aril f :.per# ao co#ris..' `base
design, efrt tsep, STEP 4). y amble, u tti,iat rlevelap aid co#npa . costa,' bared .eta a .Pelii,i` level
`I"he Dh4siEori recq*ies that wastcvrater disposal alternativcs may be limited for . some 4coft-oornestic wits"tewater
scenarios} and Ilfull. alternAtives evaluation may not be warranted. If there is some clnesdr�n as to whether as ahtexnative
naay be e]Eimitiated, contact the NT'DE$ Unit staff. Some scenarios that might 130trequire, a AXIS]
tematives evaluation
iticludc:
ir'i� "'ir�er ,�'.''' :+�._ ' : •i.+�W".:,�".. :r:+::�:iL..�"�J;fS'�.1s.`"-!� `, E%�'i ei1:F,e, "Fyy v,i x r . . �:
_��r! e #: '5�' r i9"�a: U''';_ Q"'r.1,t'r'r' � r. rr, •.,�, .,
�• �fsG At tfsient a£ '�' v '
p 6� at utt `l a a
rnenxbzatie t�echsaol,ogy a g, . wvrrse osmosis, nanofiltration or ion rx
concentrated eras a ) a! Bya ►..twW to generate
$ ' . is txeams. 'I'laese waates.treams Are Abt a xenabl + ]atad.a� caticart and do t cst
have tQ be evplus►trc#.for tltia altierrJativ't. HOWWAver, since these. et slareama .cait.als have a.toxic impact
on A.rviceiv ftvehWatgr aye is s pmpc�aed rear dish $
l'a*S . these wTpi bo..fres�swafGars vvi11 not be
oansider+cd for an N1�bES perrriit utileas you can dMonstsatc.that the euv oi�mental ixzspact: would be
hh , -wAniftW biped an dilution r odelir You should itwves ` to whether .,the ,�sew'ater can be piped w a
stregrn writ qufcnt dllu tar wbe
Hate that disch!n' th"er, a iocl, npight accoi�niri:,te this,
s frarn dt4!r. Please
., . I'Pa .that ut a reeass tradost 'ur cquveaticid to educe a
wasteskram that is, 3xcit aahltxe therefore no dis tys.,�l alternatiuea c Fx
' nf2 : autcitxat[:` "ruled out as itsfdasilalsE "' 'or tkes other fci toPL)iHS..,v<►obaite,: oic.' "ermi` ; : "s i. s��` s for reverse
OSt13O81S�.l CsF~lf9ktlg!>. t y.,•.: �f-1 j, "Ot"".
neatxGl liltrtui'aixd`conv+erxaoral t�U'Y Ps:
• ronndarafe; 'k�• itte n t " L .
�r,SF Yon"Will neeCl t#
,.i.wA
•i,• 's.;; >�d, tio}i� is?���a;galLcrlOs,,;ia-at ,,!�!`, ;. ,�G�P,coixt►cfpan,
tern ttC via•.4?l�#ltex,4
eatlOtt ajr[11s.Q6a� ahfY3ly►tlV¢B. Wtlilf�'^Wtz?d' li@ µr1F�9PAtlex
zpral arias, .it w4u1d Ihot be a `Y �`' ' ` ,:: gip. sYson �t be: E+ea�s '+itiTtsttsatiat in
feseiraXr site attvc ib dav�tatowri C o'tte, w +GrEa there ie no laird av4 stile Ent vv�steWater application, In this instance, you may simply state that land ap�licati,an is inf�asils�a based
on land eotxstrAinte vv�ithin the city. 5�ou will also Head to U'Aft p6r'- zh " q' ' i -to 'ea idti 'p' �in
accorclAxsce -4it6 Altetr adve A), since theft ai'e sOtn.'6 municipalities ti;sit have iccepted this waateetreatri
AAA Guidance Document Mori one.23, 2005
Doge 4 of 8

Mar 26 2007 11:11AM C1a!j County Water & Sewer [phone]
p.8
r-1:5c�CU=
erdal/ituiustri�l uses. Some of these tcu®e applicaciatxs ,7I be evaluated uadez Alternative S, Land
Purge 5 Of 8
n

Mar 26 2007 11:11AM Clad County Water & Sewer [phone]
P.8
APPlicaticm. The design of-reckitned-wIter systems must meet the treatment and' design requil9nkinb"specified in I SANCAC 2H.0219, j­
1. No-taev�or 14chA W_ 10 bgbce Waters.
eVIftdift9'(*dditiotiid) discharge 0f'6:11*n'con sun=g wo:i
of North Carolina if both* the `summer 7QIO'*ad 30Q2 stienififlam -are egiiitittd to be Zero. jtL
Accordance with 15A NCAC 2&0206(0. Private applicants must contact the Federal USGS in Raleigh at
919-571-4000 and *bW:ti­-(g6tj&j fbc g-whiinw,fee). th'.. '0tr*khfl&WdILta (s7IO;.3GQ2 q,
=nunl average strearna6w) at the propot*d di$chax" 1* 'cation Irece�
EAA. said will be used to develop pennit Urnits. This information inust-be-included in the
2. All direct dischaW system of oxygm-consumiag wasft ahould,j*zgv�jUated both with terdRI7 ffifttion
— DV a week]y gain mg/l, NH3-N" I A and without; iLnd aaauming
3. Provide a des then of the PrWosed vmtmfittr trfttm=t faciLitice' -including t. sthetholtic diagram of -
the tna* components and R Site PIRn of the treatment &cffity..with Q
4. 'Provide 6Dc=enttL&rj of the utm J�aecv),
xva�Wty'bfrcquited Und gitid/,or vasenjen. t,jgmementg.
5- COnduct 2 .Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 41
6. Note. All direct dischax -treatment systems mutt c"17 With Re4bility Req
NCAC.2H..0124 well agmnunura jDe in I umemmtz specified in I SA
cified 5A,NCAC 2H.0219,
Qlghl"0601i- Of A111=-ative
You should evaluate the possibility
sibility of a com'bizatioit of wastewater alternatives th.-j t �-V�oWd jj�� e Or eliminate a
opl�mu*..0664
'Walte='Rtivi4 FOrVz=&�, consider whether the fla—, �'iii ­­ 1?�U,
the dry season *Iien- stie2mflows are st theii'ldv)O%j jftd - . 6id6k� tyftem during
Systm during the wet season %,bon 904s: Ptov'&; It" `&udbh,`Ah& 6P&dbil-iii, NPDRS discharge
provides its greatest clilution. 'May � not heirs 4: Wmenable to bad. application and �the. receiving Stream
STIEV4.'Evaltiat", onc>rimic
To providevalidcost comparisons asn" 41 tccb,00109ically feasible wastmmter alternatives identKed in STEP 3, a 20-
yvu Present value, of Costs Analysis (PVCA) ftiva t.. be, patfotmed. A
IPPWPIiQte for composing feimsible. 0 c PreUnfwy design kvtl effort 13 considered
On . &Ll;m . PO-94s'an their * aqO9-*gd. oos, cost oompatisCWL, all future
Alto, -gist. wiine,
125C4 M rne "YxnKi
t
,0WpmeoMon
referred to as I$icient dl5m=ted value" or "present worth"(ent t3o nonlxi earth Mc=t value is also
The FVCA should include all . monetary costs associated with construatiog, startup.; and. annual ,operation
mKintOnInce of a faddity, : All Up cost infb=­ ation must be Pr, m,ided, and costs Must be refc=c . and
referenced in paragraph fonn&t by Runwimdaing the source' ed. Costs can be
1.0 -Utili,1504. (vg-p vendor quotes, *land. quotes, past
b'4 C9PI#"CtkM.Tj*x, 06). Vender raLltor
quotes:�Cccivvd, for, tpeatme
- _at jxwts or 0
rcAltor. land quotcp, ib;Tboincluded.az other cc�aponpmts, to well as
well. �Ior.each treatment alternative identified. 0 technologically fissible,
costs should include, but not be Hadtod to, the followinF.
x4qlaisiti on CO$U
tqwpnimt,costa
Izyststiatftax'zr ;r
coats
De costs
costs
EA A Ouidanm Lbcument Veraiory June 23, 2009
page 6 Of 8

Mar 26 2997 11:12nM Clad County Water & Sewer
[phone] p,10
l
Recurrjag Cads, ...: ;
Operafm and tslsintesance costs (with rep*
::�,i
p aeat errata)'
a ... Laborataty costa,oasumin .a weekly monitoring:x0gi,me roz discharge ffptcw :Md.&.=ntialy. wane for
$tan -discharge °syste W. . .
a operator and support staff 'cmts
+ RasiduoMl••diaposal costs
■ Connection fees and subsequent user fees
■ Pernit and compliance fees
' Utility costs (power, water, etc.)
host Op rtiini: a a
The fa bVifig standard faiitnula' fot computing the present value 'must be -used -in 0 cost estimates ;made under this
evaluation:
PV=C + i
P'V = Present value of cost$•
a:: ,,= Cgetg tticurrcc in,thc Pi xeseat year, . .
t , ..'Cvatsiftcurted'i't1r•fiitiA,e,t,:. .. ,t .,
# t = Time period after the ptos ti per` ("fist ptes�cht'pear'i�' f = {?)"
n = Ending yeat:of the life,of the .facility. ....:.:............ .
t = Currerst EPA diecouat rate. EPA adjusts this rate annually on October 1, and it cats be accessed &xn
the Intertlet at http:/Vww.nccgLnet/fap/ewerf/201g A.htmL
If recurzing coats, are the aatma ip i►eare 1. thtough 24, then Ct=C snd the formula, redu to,
PY= Co +... +r}p 1.1
As ati esaiiipla, asausriiiag capital costa (Co) of $2 million, ahi�ual recurring coats (c) of $40,000, and a discount rate (r)
of 5.625°/a, the 20-year (n=20) present value .of caste would equal:
:...c4pit4,cQ8t$,+ xec`azr ag costs X [(1+0.05425)20--1j /,. p.05625(1+0.05.S25)a°)
PV= $2,000,000 + $40,000 K [i.98/0.168]
F'V= $2,000,000 + $471,428
P'V= $2,471,428
xasetst wpt. costs developed fox alb ,[cphnokagicallg
'Y'he,FA but uaclude.a Cost .Tablt .�vlvtch sutntes p
feasible wastewater alternau'ves. The summary should, include. s bxe ,of 4jtpat costa ,9txtl ;e g. �o6gti. In
some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine coat estimates for some alternatives,'or`.posatbly collect
Retool soil data to better characterize the land. application alternative. Ultimately, the fiiw di t iaadon. on cost
effecttvettess is made 1ap.tht Division vvit4i consideratiafi of rnosxetaey costs as well as potential envsronr<tewd impacts.
SM Quuularace Doarnent version: June 23, 2005
Pcger x' af's

Mar 26 2007 11:12AM C1a�j County Water & Sewer [phone]
p. 11
Attachment -A.. ca1- vertitne ' ,R:
rM
N -Catalina GEA:=A Statute 143-215.1' (C)(o) gooft 1nPut *dm lbca1' gvvrsn nents'in the issuance
of NPDES ' Pwrmits for aaa-metaieipal doenesdc wasxaPater treatment facdlitles. S cifi
Counnission 0954C) may not act on an apPlication ,bar a new ucn-muru ` al domes eras � � .Edi �tt#1 Maao it has
received a written statemem from each cityand corm tY hi it has
sod fadi oval itr a county $ovetYtmertt having �ttdedictioa over ywY pelt of��o:itstdc'�a which the
P ty pputteuames are to be located. The w2i t n ataecateut sh4 des r whedw tbe.sky cr,county has a
acntng or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such as a�rdhu nce is in ef�sc rwhether the
osdinatuea. The EMC altall not a rove a t) pr'apoped facility is, coplim"nt with the
inccneistGnt with a cu subdivision oadinaaemt agpltcatian for any heilitp which a city or +county hoe de#eeroinecl to be
B eg unless the approval of such applioa$on is 'dewrmined, 'to' have statewide
sigwf nice and is in the beet interest of the State.
Iastnaadnns a I ti,•.nt. t 1F-�.. Friox to submitting an application for a NPDPS Permit far a proposed Erp3ity, fire ,tippliCant
shall reciuest that both the nearby city and county gormmentemplete this form. The applic�r$PWtr
., :Sgbtaft:a copy of the. permit aWgrrton:(vdm.,a myucat the county by certified mail, for this foctx sto be aompkted) to the clerk of the dip and
tutu= receipt requested.
■ If either (or bath) local governments) U(s) to mail the completed Faun, as evidenced by the postmark on the Cc rdf cl
Mail card(s), within 15 days afier receiving and. signing for the certified toad, the applicant
the NPDES Unit. asap submit the applicadon to
■ As evidence to the Commission that the local
copy-ofth.e certified reait,card alma with p• notarized etxr atattri that the local t(s) faed to respond thin i5 days, the applicant shalt submit a
15-day pepod:. B 80vernment(a) faded to respond within the
Laumetlafte to thip i r++•sl Y'' •-- ' nearby=.City arsd/or,Corux
any part of the land art which the proposed facilitg orita a tY i °vc uieht which. inaiy`iiav�e oc has jurisdiction o'n
pptiitmAdces are to be located ie` regirired tW costtplete and return this
fauns to the ntppiicant within 15 days of receipt. 17u form trust be Oiled and not eecL .
i
Name of local government
Dona the city/county have f utdadiciitta over as Put of the larxd ou/County)
located? Yas No Y P vrl ch the pibpde;6d' frcihty and its` :Wurte„*ycos are to be ' ( ] If nb, please sign thin form, have it notadzed, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zotLing or subdivision ordinance? 'Yee (j No [ )
If(yythere .aa a �s�g pr sul'�divisiam and
;Y .,:,;...,b ;.. —. a .. .... .,
the ordinance? Yes [ j
Z]att .
(City Manager/County Manager)
State at , County of
On this of
Personally appeared before ni% the said
S+ d Tom _ to me known and ]mown to me to. be the person described in
sad who executed the FoMd-01AW d�ument and he or she) ac�o a 49e d thAt he (ox she)' Otwuted the a9zAe and being duly MOM
by ate, malt'oath diet the' steteinekta'iti the di ent a" trite.
my-cdmnisaiou egpirea (Sigriattire ofXottiryPitbliis)
Notary' Pttblic�(0iivaial Se4
A;d A guidance Dbcumew Version: June 23, 2005
Page 8 of 8

M
M
Mar 26 2007 11113nM Clad Count;j Water & Sewer [phone]
p,12
r " or ►'� �'dLl�'l'! 0 ( cam,
Permit NCO026697
A. (I.) EFFLUENT ,LIM1TATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENI'S
During the petiod beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discimtges shall be limited and m+owtored by the Permittee as
spceif ed below:
EFFGtJEV'
LIMITS ::.
:: n`�° ;�11[7NITOAINiG.a !E0 JA W NT$
CHARACTERISTjCo
''
1i,h► ``: kl i;.,Wy ;:,.,:•,,:,:!
d,;
...lm. mp,�a..�:,,., Ili . 8":I.i10I1t .
AversLIS
Flaw
0.3 MGD
Contlnuaus
Recording
Influent or Effluent
SOD, 5 day (20°C)2
30.0 mg/L
46.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent & Effluent
Total Suspended Resldue2
30.0 mglL
48.0 mg/L
Weekly
Composite
Influent & Effluent
Hs as N
11.0 rngrL
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
A rll 1 - October 31
NHs as N.
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Novomber 1- Arch 31
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
Effluent,
Fecal Calibrm
2001100 m!
4001100 ml
Weekly
Crab
Upstream & Downstream
Effluent
(geometric mean
Total Residual Chlorine
20.t),up/L
Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
Semi-annually
Composite
Effluent
N0 +NOs+TKN
Total Phosphorus
Semhannualiy
Composite
Effluent
Temperature eC)
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (IC)
Weekly
Grab
Upatreem & Downstream
pH3
Weekly
Ng
Effluent
Foam es�
I. Upstream = at least 50 feet upstream from the outfatl. Downstream = at least 100 feet downstream froth the outfall.
2, The monthly average effluent HODS and Total Suspended Residue concentrations shall not exceed 150/6 of the respective
influent value (85% removal),
3. The pl-i shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
There shall be na discharge of flosting solids or visible Foam in other than trace amounts.

F WqT�
�Vtt Michael F. Easley, Governor
PNorth Carolina Department iviron nt a Natural "+lGrces
j Alan W. ime P E irector
Division of Water Quality
" ..0 Asheville Regional Office
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION
January 4, 2006
Mr. Stephen Sellers, Chairman
Clay County Water & Sewer District
Post Office Box 118
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Subject: Surplus Capacity
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Permit No.N00026697
Clay County
Dear Mr. Sellers:
We are in receipt of a Fast -Track Sewer Application from National Investments, LLC. The permit;
if issued, would ultimately introduce 51,000 gallons per day of domestic wastewater into the Clay
County Water& Sewer District wastewater treatment plant.
Clay County's treatment plant has a design hydraulic capacity of 300,000 gallons per day.
Presently the plant has a surplus hydraulic capacity of approximately 210,000 gallons per day.
Since April of'thisiyear the Division of Water Quality has issued seven fast -track sewer permits`
which would allow the introduction of 194,880 gallons per day of additional wastewater to the
Clay'County treatment plant; leaving a surplus capacity on paper of approximately 38,000 gallons :.
per day. The National Investments asks for permission to construct and operate sewers which
would introduce 51,000 gallons per day of wastewater into the Cane Creek Water & Sewer
District plant which would entirely erase this remaining paper surplus capacity; a fact which is of
some concern to us.
The Clay County Water & Sewer District needs to start thinking about the construction of
additional treatment plant hydraulic capacity. We would suggest that the District review fast track
permits issued for sewer construction this year to determine if, as a result of changes in
development plans, permitted flow volumes could be reduced. Even though the treatment plant
surplus has only been used up completely on paper; nonetheless at some point we would feel
the .need to stop issuing further sewer line permits.
Based upon the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T.0118, prior to reaching 80% utilization of the
plant's hydraulic capacity, the Clay County Water & Sewer District is required to submit an
engineering evaluation of wastewater treatment, utilization , and disposal needs. Prior to
exceeding 90% of the plant's hydraulic capacity the Clay County Water & Sewer District must

Vets items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
it( ; if Restricted Deliveryis desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
SO that we can return the card to you.
■_ Attach this card to the back of the mailnisra
— /�/AA,, No
��i 2090 U.S. H ghw_
NCDENR
Ms Cheryl J. Stack, Project
Na(((ional Investments, LLC
Post Office Box 293
_Hiawassee, Georgia 30546
A.
II B.'Rr elved by(Prl
Tina Department of
Natural Resources
Inanoa, Nc 28778 s
s P©2
..,
/41/(,,
Agent
� Adtlressee
n e 1 C. Date of Delivery
of Irl
d' hem 17 ❑ Yes
❑ No
s W-1 W -
y4lce Type
Certified Man
Registered Receipt for Merchandise Insured M ❑ c.on
4. Restricted
------- 7006 2150 0005 2459 SL56
PS Form 3811, February 2004
Domestic Return Receipt
Fee) ❑ Yes
102595-02-M4540